1997-06-04 Final DRC MinutesCity of Orange
Design Review Board
MINUTES
for Wednesday, June 4, 1997
Board Members Present: Tim McCormack
Steven McHarris
Steven Prothero (Chair)
Richard Cavecche
Robert Reilly
Board Members Absent: None
Staff in Attendance: Chuck Lau, Associate Planner
James Donovan, Associate Planner
Howard Morris, Landscape Coordinator
Ad~zinistrative Session - 4: 30 P.M.
The board met for an administrative session beginning at 4:30 P.M. The meeting adjourned at
approximately 10:30 P.M.
Regular Session - 5:00 P.M.
Steven Prothero opened the meeting. Review and approval of the May 21, 1997 minutes were
defer-ed to the June 18, 1997 meeting.
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 2
(1) DRB No. 3134
Century Theatres
1501 W. Katella Ave.
Stephen Copley, Nowell & Associates
• Landscape construction plans fora 25-
screen theater project
• C-R zone (Commercial Recreation)
The project landscape architect, Stephen Copley, presented color samples of the finishing
materials and catalogs brochures of various pedestrian furniture and fixtures used for the project.
Also presented were the final landscape construction document plans which showed most of the
changes suggested by the DRB. One of the items that remain unchanged from the previous
submittal is the use of Italian Cypress trees along the main entrance to the complex. The reason
for this is to direct focus towards the main theater complex and not the parking lot area.
Additionally, the perimeter landscaping fronting along Main Street and Katella Avenue was also
presented to the DRB for approval.
MOTION by Tim McCormack to approve the project subject to the following conditions:
1. In the event that the quantity of Eucalyptus Microtheca is not available in 24 inch box, then
15 gallon maybe used in selective areas at the discretion of the landscape architect.
2. Replace Flame Vine (Pyrostegia Venusta) with Boston Ivy (Parthenocissus Tricuspidata).
3. Annual colors plant material shall be spaced 6 inches on center rather than 12 inches.
4. Replace Rainbird 1804 Series sprinlders to 1806 Series sprii~lclers in turf areas.
5. Provide City required notes on appropriate pages of the landscape and irrigation plans.
G. Submit revised plans to City staff for approval.
SECOND: Steve McHan-is
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McBanis and Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: Steve Prothero
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Minutes for furze 4, 1997
Page 3
(2) DRB No. 3151
Outback/Taft Storage
1934 E. Taft Ave.
Jordan Architects Inc.
• Landscape plans for self-storage facility
• M-1 zone (Light Manufacturing)
Todd Voelker and Brian Hull from Jordan Architects, Inc. were present These are the final
construction document plans,
Tim McCoi7nack raised concerns regarding the lack of tree screening from the freeway. This is
still not being mitigated Also, is there any protection for the corners of the buildings at drive
aisle intersections?
The applicant replied that due to the uncertainties of CalTran's conshuction scheduling, adding
screen trees at this time would not be practical In regards to the comers of the buildings they
would be protected with steel bollards.
MOTION by Steve Prothero to approve the project subject to the following conditions:
1. Change two of the Rhus Lancea trees to Eucalyptus trees at the east side of the office
building so that it matches the existing row of five Eucalyptus trees.
2. Clarify ground cover to maintain weed control at all areas where it is cun-ently not indicated
as pavement or planted areas.
3. Modify hydroseed mix to include a four season planting mix to provide year round color and
foliage.
4. Provide City required notes on the appropriate pages of the landscape and irrigation plans.
5. Provide mulch or gravel in the area between Building "G" and the westerly boundary line.
6. Revised final plans shall be submitted to staff for approval.
SECOND: Rick Cavecche
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: Robert Reilly
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Minutes for Jurae 4, 1997
Page 4
(3) DRB No. 3188
Woodside Plaza Remodel of an existing retail center
3110-3134 E. Chapman Avenue C-1 zone (Limited Business)
William C, Sharon, Architect
Mr. Tom Campos, project architect, presented revised plans that showed all the revisions that
were required from the previous meeting.
The DRB raised concerns with the under lighting of the awnings and the view from underneath.
MOTION by Rick Cavecche to approve the project subject to the following conditions:
1. Awnings shall be opaque and be provided with side skirt and mesh return underneath to
accommodate internal fluorescent lights.
2. Submit sign program to DRB,
SECOND: Robert Reilly
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Mir7~utes for June 4, 1997
Pab e 5
(4) DRB No. 3209
Polygon Communities, Inc.
Hewes Street & Rancho Santiago Blvd
MDS Consulting
• Building elevations for tract of 100 units
• R-1-8/-10 (Single Family Residential)
zones, with minimum lot sizes of 8,000 and
10,000 square feet
Steve Shepard, Project Manager, and Hai>Ic Jimenez, MDS Consulting, presented the project to
the DRB. The proposal includes a new model for the larger 10,000 sq.ft. lots which is similar in
desigm to one of the three models that was approved at the previous meeting. A Variance and an
Administrative Adjustment Permit was approved for this project to allowed the some of the traits
to be within 10 to 16 ft. of the front property line. By varying the front yard setbacks on several
of these houses, it creates a more interesting streetscape. As a condition of approval for the
waiver of setback reduirements, the DRB is being asked to review the site plan and building
elevations to assure that proper architectural t-eatments are being incorporated.
The DRB expressed concerns with the width of paved driveways allowed for the houses that has
optional four car garages.
Staff replied that an ordinance amendnnent is being proposed to limit the width of the driveway
area that would be allowed for residential lots. The new ordinance would allow up to a
maximum of 60% width of the front yard area to be paved. The maximum width of the driveway
would be 24 ft.
The board supports the project based on the finding that the building elevations are well
articulated and adds interest to the streetscape. And based on the fact that most of the setback
encroachments are open architectural elements rather than enclosed structures. And also based
on the fact that the front yard area is limited to a maximum 60% pavement.
MOTION by Steve Prothero to approve the project as submitted
SECOND: Richard Cavecche
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review Boarcl
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 6
(5) DRB No. 3211
Boston Market
Mall of Orange
The Reyes Group
• Building elevations and landscape plan for
new restaurant building
• C-TR zone (Limited Business)
(This item was approved on the consent calendar)
MOTION by Robert Reilly to approve the project as submitted.
SECOND: Steve McHarris
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOI/S: None
ABSIJNT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 7
(6) DRB No. 3204
Victor Quinones
417 N. Cypress Street
West Coast Construction
• Demolish and reconstruct existing house
• R-2-6 zone (Duplex Residential District)
• Old Towne
Mr. Victor Quinones, owner of the property, and Brian I~ammock, Westcoast Construction
presented the project to the board. The DRB had approved the construction of a detached 2-car
garage on this property back on February 5, 1997. 'The existing residence was intended to
remain unchanged with only minor repair and maintenance work. Subseduently, however, it was
discovered that most of the structural members were badly damaged by termites, and thereby
resulting in nearly a complete rebuilt. The overall size, shape, and footprint of the building
remained essentially unchanged.
The board raised concerns with the siding material being used. Is wood being used, or some type
of composite material? The existing 6 ft. high chain-link fence is non-conforming and is in need
of repair. Other concerns includes railing details, windows, doors, roof material, etc.
MOTION by Steve Prothero to approve the project to the following conditions:
1. Remove existing 6 ft. high chain-link fence from front yard setback area. Any fence in this
area shall be made of wood, and not to exceed 42 inches in height.
2. Recommend use of 4 inch wood lap siding. Alternative composite material siding may be
used, subject to review and approval by Dan Ryan -Senior Historic Preservation Planner.
3. Aluminum frame sliding windows are not permitted. Replace with wood hung windows.
Trim shall match other existing bungalow style houses in the area.
4. Front porch handrail shall be made of 2" x 6" shaped wood cap with 2" x 2"pickets.
5. Exposed blocks at the foundation shall be sacked with concrete to have a smooth sanded type
finish. Provide joint at line of material change.
6. Roof material shall be composition shingle. Black color is approved.
7. Fascia boards at rafter tails are approved. (Match original as shown on photographs)
~. House colors -gray field with white trim is approved.
9. Provide wood panel type doors.
] 0. Provide ribbon driveway to the back edge of the house.
SECOND: Steve McHarris
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orcni~e -Design Review Boat~cl
Meeting Minutes fon June 4, 1997
Page 8
(7) DRB No. 3219
Park Orleans HOA
660 S. Glassell Street
Gannon Design
• Monument sign proposed for entry to
residential condominium project
• R-3 zone (Multi-Family Residential District)
(Project approved on the Consent Calendar.)
MOTION by Rick Cavecche to approve the proposed alternative #2 sign with the grid pattern
and lower 5 ft. overall height.
SECOND: Robert Reilly
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tian McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review Bocarciz
Meetir~~g Mitzuzes for June 4, 1997
Page J
(8) DRB No. 3220
New Age Psychic •
1305 W. Chapman Avenue •
Greg Ramirez, Greco Signs
Free standing sign
C-2 zone (General Business District)
(Project approved on the Consent Calendar.)
MOTION by Steve Prothero to approve the project subject to the following condition:
Provide opaque background.
SrCOND: Steve McHarris
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOI/S: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review 13ourd
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 10
(9) DRB No. 3221
Cambridge Medical Plaza Free Standing Sign
1040-1044 E. Chapman Avenue O-P zone (Office Professional District)
Barrett Construction
Dean Barrett -Barrett Construction, presented the project to the DRB. The sign is only 42" high
and non-illuminated.
The DRB raised concerns with how the plywood is being integrated with the concrete block.
MOTION by Steve Prothero to approve the project subject to the following conditions:
1. Board shall be held back 2" from the edge of the pilasters and front the top of the sign.
2. Wood panel shall be provided with a raised trim piece around the edge.
SECOND: Rick Cavecche
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHaiYis, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Oa~ange -Design Review 13ocrrd
Meeting Minutes fo~~ .hone 4, 19>7
Page ll
(10) DRB No. 3222
Mall of Orange •
Tustin Street, between Meats & Heim
Feola Carli & Archuleta Architects
Revision to the main pedestrian entrance
on the east side of the mall, with area
added for outdoor dining
C-TR zone (Limited Business)
The project was presented by Bill DeEiel and Barbara Toth. The proposal is to provide emphasis
for the entrance to the mall. Although there are budget constraints, the design has been approved
by their major tenants.
The DRB stated that more should be done to marls the shopping center, perhaps this treatment
can be extended to other parts of the Mall. Are there any long range plans for this`?
Steve Prothero stated that he is personally not very fond of this treatment, as it is not consistent
architecturally with the existing mall architecture. If this were to be approved, however, it
should not be tied into the existing fi-eestanding sigm, but rather terminate at either side.
Tim McCormack asked if the mall's landscaping can be renovated? The applicant replied that it
is not in the budget.
Rick Cavecche stated that the concept is acceptable, however, more details are needed with
fiu-ther refinements.
MOTION by Rick Cavecche to continued review of this item for further study. The applicant
may retunl with revised plans to the next scheduled meeting without prior submittal for the
packets.
SECOND: Tim McCormack
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCor7l~ack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED; None
MOTION CARRIED
City of Orange -Design Review Bocirc~
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Puge 12
(11) DRB No. 3223
Chapman University
SEC Glassell and Sycamore
Dworsky Associates
• 4-story structure: Business & Information
Technology (BIT) building
• P-I (SP); Public Institution District with a
Specific Plan
Mr. Doug Dworsky, Dworsky Associates, Architects for the BIT Building, and Al McQuilkin,
Director of Facilities presented the project to the DRB. The proposal is to construct a four story
90,000 sq. ft. Business & li~formation Technology (BIT) building, located at the southeast corner
of Glassell Street and Sycamore Avenue.
Mr. Dworsky stated that the intent in the designing of the BIT Building is to bring elements of
Chapman's various traditions together. He also stated that in the development of the building,
the floor plan is a relatively tight and compact based on the fact that the site is very tightly
defined on all four sides, resulting in a four story building which contains approximately 90,000
square feet of program space. He explained how the building mass was arranged as a series of
parallel masses. These masses are expressed not only on the end elevations through a series of
separate blocks of varying heights which tend to break down the scale of this facility, but
through acttiial stepping of the plan through a creation of terraces on the north and east sides.
Mr. Dworsky explained that the University considers the campus as having dual architectural
traditions: old and new; historic buildings of classical design with a plaster finish, and newer
contemporary buildings made of concrete block distinguished by earthen tones. The University
refers to these traditions as "the white and the beige". They have gone back to the white and
beige tradition on the campus looking at very specific elements that draw upon these existing
t<aditions. The first element is the establishment of a clear base, middle and top to the building,
relating to the layout functional aspect. The base is defined by a modular material like the beige
buildings on the campus. The base wraps the entire first floor of the facility. Much of the first
floor functions do not require windows and the levels have been articulated with a series of
niches. Within these niches are cylindrical columns relating back to the white tradition on the
campus, which is carving out a niche in the plane of a building and placing architectural detail in
it They have taken that detail and created a rhythmic element along the longer elevations of the
facility. He further stated that the second floor on both the north and south elevations a series of
paired vertical windows have been created as an element of the historic class of architecture
forming the middle of the building. The top floor requires more substantial windows.
Mr. Dworsky stated that the finished material proposed for the upper three floors of the building
is a smooth painted plaster similar to the painted plaster on the older classical buildings on the
cair~pus.
Mr. Dworsky described the tradition of the Chapman window and stated that they would use it in
a tower element that was light and airy. The other uses of the Chapman window on the main
entry, the east elevation, would be to use the repetitive motif wrapped around the two sides of the
entry lobby. The grill work as shown on Memorial Halk would be used along the Glassell
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Minutes for June 4, J 997
Page 13
elevation. This elevation also shows a series of parallel blocks, each with different proportions
and window expressions.
Mr. Dworsky explained that a landscape theime has also been developed. On the east side a
hardscape entry plaza has been created because this will be a major entry point for pedest<ians
into the campus and create some contrast on what is proposed as the site for the new chapel. The
north of the building is proposed to be developed with a double row of vase-shaped trees. The
south side has two different landscape heatments. The first is the use of a small grove of palm
trees creating a shaded canopy for the small cafe on the ground floor in the southeast coi7~er of
the building. The second is the use of a series of trees to create a green alley in between the BIT
building and the existing Film and Television school. An existing large oak tree is proposed to
be maintained for the north east corner,
Mr. Dworsky stated that there was another change from the original submittal regarding the 68
foot overall height. Upon further study of the technical requirements for the building, it is now
proposed to be within the 62 foot height limit.
Steve Prothero asked Mr. Dworsky to address how the building fits with the Southwest Desi~m
Standards which were adopted by the Specific Plan for the University.
Mr. Dworsky answered that the Specific Plan recognizes the Southwest Design Standards and
the existing traditions on campus and the need to simultaneously relate to these traditions, but
allow variety and creativity within a framework of the existing architectural context. He stated
that some of the critical elements of the guidelines were to avoid buildings that are boxy and
unarticulated. This has been accomplished by breaking down a rectangular mass into a series of
interlocking masses and the development of articulated elevations with different window
treatments as shown on both east and west elevations.
Steve Mc1-Iarris asked if the Specific Plan was Mr. Dworksy's long range development plan.
Also, if the film and Television building was to remain in the long range plan for the campus.
Al McQuillcin replied that in the long range plan the film and Television building was a
candidate for replacement within the next five or ten years.
Mr. McHarris inquired if airy thought had been given to bridging the pedestrian crossing of
Glassell.
Mr, McQuillcin answered that traffic study was been done and it was recommended that a signal
be installed at the corner of Sycamore and Glassell with pedestrian crossing. Elevated bridges
were also examined and it was determined that there would be too many problems related to
them. There was a discussion regarding the needed span of the bridge.
Rich Cavecche expressed his concern regarding the relation to the historical structures and the
design plan, including the mass of the structure in relation to the streetscape along Glassell. He
stated that it seemed the emphasis was heavier on the newer structures. He also is concerned
with the front facade on Glassell and the relation of that building to the historical sti-uctures.
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 14
Mr. Dworsky replied that they have tried to create a transitional building that draws upon the
tradition and establishes the aspect of the campus. It's a very sensitive thing to relate to treasured
historical buildings. Our feeling is that the worst thing to do is to mimic the historic buildings on
campus, because they're special. They have special physical characteristics and an aesthetic
appearance, but they but they also have a special emotional place in people's hearts and
remembrances, and especially for ahm~ni. You want to ensure that the historic context in not
t-ivialized. On the other hand, you don't want to turn your back on it...And that's why what
we've attempted to do is create a transitional building, a building that does not seek to mimic,
but instead draws upon aspects of that tradition.
Mr. Cavecche noted that the building has an interior Sycamore ent-ance to the University and
limited access fiom Glassell. The orientation of the building is toward the campus interior, and
the back of the building is what fronts on Glassell. This relationship does not encourage
integration with Glassell Street and that point is evident in the architectural treatment of this
elevation. It's the treatment on Glassell that concerns him. As you're driving up ar down
Glassell, that's probably the last building one would expect to see: a large, mare modern
structure, even fllough it has certain elements reflected in the Memorial Quad and some of the
other buildings on campus. It stands out as a very imposing structure; a monumental structure
among historic buildings and low lying apart~~ents and other smaller structures on Glassell. I-Ie
doesn't la~ow what can be done about that because of site constraints and the architect's need to
produce a building that actually functions as a component of the University. Could something be
done through landscaping or another issue to mitigate the mass of the building?
Mr. Dworsky felt that substantial mitigation has been accomplished by the break down of scale
of the building into separate clustered masses, the stepping of the building from three stories to
four stories, the setback greater than that required by the Specific Plan and the clustering of the
landscaping in front of the Glassell elevation.
Mr. McHan-is expressed a concern that the building is organized with strong vertical~e]ements. It
has a horizontal base and a middle band, but no horizontal treatment along the top. It has several
tops. The architectural approach is to take the surface of a large volume and reorganize it or
break it down into vertical or horizontal elements. The campus classical buildings aren't so
massive and don't require a breakdown in the elevations. It is frust-ating to him that the
architecture is not presenting such a unified theme. It is applied to, rather than integrated within,
the building.
Mr. Dworsky replied that the functional requirements of a modern institutional building are very
different. They require larger floor plates, greater efficiency and flexibility. The scale is vastly
different than small floor plate buildings, and it is difficult to adapt the same approach in design.
A building of this scale cannot be designed in a unified theme unless it ultimately appears as a
singular, large box.
Mr. Prothero stated that he felt that the building failed in two attempts, first to address Glassell
as a st-eetscape and secondly, the classical elements of the building. It lacks punched openings,
banding, stronger horizontal elements in keeping with the venlacular of classical architectw-e or
its elements. It does nothing to establish an architectural link between the campus and the
City of Orunge -Design Reviei~~ Board
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 15
coinmwzity. Especially with the University moving across the street, Glassell Street's elevation
deserves mare attention to reinfarce the relationship.
Robert Reilly suggested that the building could be lowered by constructing a basement
Mr. McQuillcin pointed out that ground level classrooms will be partly subtei7anean. According
the Specific Plan the proposed height of the building is not excessive.
Mr. Cavecche stated that another concern with the building is the abruptness of how the 62 foot
height was reached.
Mr. Dworsky explained that there is a 45 foot setback and substantial landscaping that buffers
that height. The height contours do recognize the fact that the 62 foot mass should not occur on
the property line.
Tim McCormack and Al McQuillcin discussed how the building would fit into futw-e plans, how
it addresses current needs, and the use of the parking lot and how it relates to the campus
enhance and pedestrian circulation.
Mr. Prothero asked whether there were any comments from members of the audience.
Ann Seibert (Old Towne Preservation Association) agreed with many of the boards comments
and stated that she was concerned about the way the building reflected the streetscape on
Glassell Street.
Mary Anne Skolpanich (Old Towne Preservation Association) agreed with the comments that
Ms. Seibert and the board made regarding most of the massing being vertical and that it tends to
give the building a more modern look.
Mr. Tom Matuzak (Old Towne Preservation Association) spoke about the Historic Preservation
Design Standards for Old Towne and felt that building does not conform with the Design
Standards.
Mr. Dean Hizer (Old Towne Preservation Association) commented that despite flee size of the
building, he felt that by using the same kind of facade facing Glassell as the facades on the
Memorial Quad would make the building look good.
Mr_ Prothero asked staff to explain the approval process. Is the board to take final action on this
project or make a recommendation'?
Jim Donovan explanled that the Chapman Specific Plan requires DRB consideration of all
projects on campus. The Design Review Board has final approval authority aside from the
Planning Director, who reviews and approves the site plan and issues such as building height.
The architectural guidelines within the University's plan should be considered as primary. Old
Towne Standards and Southwest Standards are incorporated by reference.
City of Orange -Design Review Board
Meeting Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 16
There was a discussion regarding the treatiment of the Glassell elevation, the articulation of the
top of the building and the landscaping.
The board concurred that it would probably not take action to approve the proposal unless
revisions were made. Would the applicant take these comments into consideration and revise the
plans, or is a decision requested on the basis of this proposal?
Mr. Dworsky asked first whether it was correct to interpret the board's concerts as being more
concerted about the building's appearance on Glassell Street. If lre were to focus his efforts on
revising the Sycamore and Glassell facades, might that be enough to resolve the board's
concenls? (Some board members expressed agreement). Mr. Dworsky requested to continue
this review until the plans could be revised and discussed at the next Design Review Board
meetnlg.
MOTION by Rick Cavecche to continued review of this item.
SECOND: Steve Prothero
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHarris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED
Git~~ of Orange - Desigf7. Review Boarcl
Meetijig Minutes for June 4, 1997
Page 17
(12) DRB No. 3224
Chapman University
N. side Palm Ave., E. of Grand St.
AI McQuilkin
• Freestanding sign for on-campus theater,
with changeable copy display
• P-I (SP) zone
Al McQuilkin, Director of Facilities presented the project to the DRB. The proposal is to
construct a marquee sign with changeable copies for the Waltman Theater.
The DRB raised concerns with the illumination of the sign, and the overall height of the sign. It
is understandable the lower marquee would need to be illuminated, however, the upper portion of
the sign should be opaque so that it does not create so much glare.
MOTION by Steve McHarris to approve the project subject to the following conditions:
1. Provide an opaque background for the upper portion of the sign.
2. Lower the overall height of the sign so that the base is approximately 12" high.
SECOND: Tim McCo~~l~ack
AYES: Richard Cavecche, Tim McCormack, Steve McHanris, Steve Prothero and
Robert Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
MOTION CARRIED