Loading...
RES-9721 Administrative Adjustment Approval Centex HomesRESOLUTION NO, 9721 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT 38-03 TO ALLOW A 20% REDUCTION IN SIDE YARD SETBACKS FOR A PORTION OF RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES WITHIN A 121 DWELLING UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON 16.60 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SERRANO AVENUE AND KENDRA DRIVE SERRANO HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 9- A).APPLICANT: CENTEX HOMES WHEREAS, Administrative Adjustment 38-03 was filed by the applicant in accordance with the provisions of the City of Orange Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Administrative Adjustment 38-03 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by state and local law; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposal were considered by certified Final Environmental Impact Report ( FEIR) 1305; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2003 the Staff Review Committee reviewed the proposed tentative tract map, site plan, landscaping plans, and building plans, and recommended that the project proceed subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 2003 the Design Review Committee reviewed the proposed site, building, landscaping, and fencing plans and recommended that the Planning Commission and City Council approve the project subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted one duly advertised public hearing on February 3, 2003 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support of or opposition to the proposal and for the purpose of considering Administrative Adjustment 38-03 upon property generally described as follows:Lot 140, Tract 16129, MM 821/3-20, in the City of Orange, County of WHEREAS, the City Council conducted one duly advertised public hearing on March 11,2003 for the purpose of considering Administrative Adjustment 38- 03.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orange that Administrative Adjustment 38-03 to allow a 20% reduction in side yard setbacks for a 121 dwelling unit development on 16.60 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Serrano Avenue and Kendra Drive is hereby approved based on the following findings:SECTION 1 - FINDINGS 1. The project conforms to the General Plan in regards to land use designation and density in that the General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential MDR) allows for residential development within the density range of 15 to 24 dwelling unit per acre. The proposal is for approximately 12 dwelling units per acne.2. The: proposed subdivision is subject to conditions to ensure that the subject site is developed in a manner consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.3. The: project is subject to conditions that will preserve the public welfare and insure that the project will not have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses.4. The Design Review Committee found that the project created an interesting neighborhood visual environment and the reduction in side yard setback would not create an adverse visual impact or adverse living environment.5. The: Staff Review Committee found that the project exceeded the requirements for providing on-site private and communal open space and the requested reduction in sidcl yard setback doe not have an adverse impact to on-site living environment or pnvacy.6. The 20% reduction in side yard setbacks does not compromise the intent of the Serrano Heights Specific Plan.SECTION 2 - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Approved FEIR 1305 was prepared in conjunction with the approval of the Serrano Heights Specific Plan and it found that the residential development of the subject site would not have any potential significant adverse impacts on the environment nor wildlife, and that existing conditions have not changed that require additional environmental analysis. SECTION 3 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following conditions are imposed with approval: General 1. All site development and construction shall conform in substance and be maintained in general conformance with plans labeled Exhibit A, B, C, D, E,and F ( dated February 3,2003 for identification purposes) and as recommended for approval by the Staff Review Committee, Design Review Committee,Planning Commission and ultimately approved by the City Council.2. This approval constitutes approval of the proposed project only to the extent that the project complies with the Serrano Heights Specific Plan, Development Agreement.3. Except as otherwise provided herein, this project is approved as a precise plan.After any application has been approved, if changes are proposed regarding the location or alteration of any use or structure, a changed plan may be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval. If the Community Development Director determines that the proposed change complies with the provisions and the spirit and intent of the approval action, and that the action would have been the same for the changed plan as for the approved plot plan,the Community Development Director may approve the changed plan without requiring a new public hearing.4. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to this approving action shall constitute grounds for the revocation of said action by the City of Orange's Planning Commission and City Council.5.The C,C,&Rs, deed restrictions, or similar agreements shall be designed for the entire site outlining specific responsibilities, such as drainage, utilities, access,parking, maintenance, landscaping, and enforcement provisions. The C,C,&Rs,deed restrictions, or similar agreement shall be subject to the joint review and approval of the Community Development Director, Public Works Director, and City Attorney. Those aspects that are zoning in nature shall be structured so they cannot be rescinded or modified without City concurrence. The City shall have discretion to enforce provisions that are zoning in nature. The developer shall be required to pay for the review of the C,C,&Rs by the City Attorney,Public Works Director, and Community Development Director at City's hourly billing rate. 6. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for residential construction or the sale of any parcel, the developer shall prepare a notice statement about the 3 development potential of the parcel and a map denoting the eXlstmg and proposed land uses, arterial highways, and public facilities including storm drains within the surrounding area. Said statement and map shall be submitted for approval of the Planning Manager and presented to each new property owner as a Buyer Notification Program as part of the sale documents. 7. Prior to the recording the Final Map and issuance of any certificates of use and occupancy, the applicant shall not grant any easements over any property subject to a requirement of dedication or irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City of Orange, unless such easements are expressly made subordinate to the easements to be offered for dedication to the City of Orange. Prior to granting any of said easements, the sub-divider shall furnish a copy of the proposed easement to the Planning Manager and Public Works Director for review and approval. Further,a copy of the approved easement shall be furnished to the Planning Manager and public Works Director prior to the issuance of any certificate of use and occupancy.8. Sub-divider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Orange, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its officers agents or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City Councilor Planning Commission concerning this subdivision, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government CodeSection 66499.37. The City shall promptly notify the sub-divider of any such claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. This condition is imposed pursuant to Government Code Section66474. 9(b).9. All residential lots and dwellings shall be sound attenuated against present and projected noise which shall be the sum of all noise impacting the project so as not to exceed a composite interior standard of 45 dba CNEL in all habitable rooms and a source specific exterior standard of 65 dba. CNEL in outdoor living areas. Evidence prepared by a State-certified acoustical consultant, that these standards will be satisfied in a manner consistent with City standard, shall be submitted as follows:a.Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or prior to the issuance of grading permits, as determined by the Building Official, the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis report to the Building Official for approval. The report shall describe in detail the exterior noise environment and preliminary mitigation measures. Acoustical design features to achieve interior noise standards may be included in the report in which case it may also satisfy (b) below.b. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for residential construction,the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis report acoustical design features of the structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise standards to the Building Official for approval along with satisfactory evidence which indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the approved acoustical report have been incorporated into the design of the project.c. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall show all freestanding acoustical barriers on the project's plot plan illustrating height, location, and construction in a manner meeting the approval of the Building Official.10. These conditions will be reprinted on the cover sheet or first page of construction plans.11. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Design Review Committee shall review and approve final building, landscaping, and fencing/wall plans.Code provisions The following Code prOVISIOns are applicable to this project and are included for information only. This is not a complete list, and other Code provisions may apply to the project:Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to this approving action shall constitute grounds for the revocation of said action by the City of Orange's Planning Commission;If not utilized, this project approval expires two years from the approval date.A one-year extension of time may be permitted upon written request, if received before the expiration deadline. ADOPTED the 8th day of April, 2003. lL of OrangeMarkATTEST: A'~~ & r.-#/tI'+ _Cassandra J. Cathcart, City Clerk, City of Orange 5 I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of April, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Ambriz, Alvarez, Murphy, Coontz, Cavecche COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None 44- 1'h'~~ ~/-i4Z Cassandra J. Cath , City Clerk, City of Orange 6