Loading...
RES-10394 Opposing California Senate Bill X6 2 SB 2RESOLUTION NO. 10394 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA OPPOSING SENATE BILL X6 2 (SB 2), A BILL SINGLING OUT ON-LINE TRAVEL COMPANIES FOR PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT IN THE TIMELY PAYMENT OF TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES.WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Constitution, Article 13, Section 32, persons who seek to challenge the imposition of a tax must first pay the tax prior to filing a legal challenge to the imposition of the tax; and WHEREAS, the City incorporated this constitutional principle in Orange Municipal Code Section5.02.065, which requires that specified persons and entities owing specified taxes must first pay the taxes before instituting a legal action challenging the taxes; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill X6 2 (SB 2) provides that travel agencies, including on-line travel agencies, and their intermediaries would be exempted from paying transient occupancy taxes prior to filing a legal challenge thereto; and WHEREAS, it is clear that SB 2 was brought forward by lobbyists for on-line travel agencies due to the fact that administrative and court decisions have been siding with cities,finding that on-line travel agencies have for years collected millions of dollars in transient occupancy taxes from hotel guests and then wrongfully converted these collected transient occupancy taxes to their personal use; and WHEREAS, SB 2 is inconsistent with the California Constitution principles that are embodied in Article 13, Section 32, Orange MunicipalCode Section 5. 02.065 and the ordinances of cities throughout the State; and WHEREAS, numerous cities, including the City of Orange, rely significantly on the timely payment of transient occupancy taxes to help pay annually for police, fire, and other vital general fund services, which services could be jeopardize by SB 2; and WHEREAS, on-line travel agencies are taking an ever increasing share of the hotel room booking business, including the responsibility for billing, collecting and remitting transient occupancy taxes to cities, thus delays and underpayments of transient occupancy taxes are having an increasingly significant effect on cities' revenue streams; and WHEREAS, on-line travel agencies already have the benefit of an administrative hearing before a neutral fact-finder to challenge the payment of transient occupancy taxes prior to payment to cities and timely payment thereof is of no significant burden to on-line travel agencies because they have already collected the taxes from their customers and simply need to properly WHEREAS, the City has instituted collection activities against on-line travel agencies to recover significant sums in transient occupancy taxes that the City believes the on-line travel agencies have wrongfully converted to their personal use; and WHEREAS, SB 2 would provide an incentive to on-line travel agencies to continue to wrongfully withhold taxes that are due and owing cities and singles out such entities for favorable treatment not enjoyed by others under the law.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, that the City Council opposes Senate Bill 2 because it is inconsistent with the principles established in the California Constitution, the Orange Municipal Code and other ordinances of cities across the state; it treats travel agencies and their intermediaries differently and more favorably than similarly situated entities in violation of the principles set forth in the equal protection clauses of both the California and United States constitutions;and it has the potential of creating significant financial hardship for cities at a time when cities can least afford it.ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 2010.ti C rolyn vec e Mayor, Cit f Orange ATTEST:Mary E. ,City Clerk, Ci range I, MARY E. MURPHY, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of January, 2010, by the following vote:AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Smith, Murphy, Cavecche, Dumitru, Bilodeau NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mary u ,City