Loading...
2014 - March 3Planning Commission March 3, 2014 Minutes Planning Commission March 3, 2014 City of Orange Monday 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Commissioners Buttress, Cathcart, Correa and Gladson ABSENT: Commissioner Steiner STAFF PRESENT: Leslie Roseberry, Planning Manager Gary Sheatz, Senior Assistant City Attorney Chad Ortlieb, Senior Planner Anne Fox, Contract Planner Angie Ibarra, Recording Secretary REGULAR SESSION 1.1 CALL TO ORDER: Vice -Chair Buttress called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1.2 FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Cathcart led the flag salute. 1.3 ROLL CALL: Commissioner Steiner was absent. 1.4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION None 1.6 CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN ITEMS: None 1.7 PLANNING MANAGER REPORTS None 1.8 APPEAL PROCEDURES: Vice -Chair Buttress advised the audience of the City's appeal process. 1 Planning Commission March 3, 2014 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: 2.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 2014. Motion was made to approve the minutes as written. MOTION: Commissioner Gladson SECOND: Commissioner Correa AYES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa & Gladson NOES: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Cathcart ABSENT: Commissioner Steiner MOTION CARRIED 2 Planning Commission March 3, 2014 3. NEW HEARING: 3.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2912 -13; MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 0745 -13; AND DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE NO. 4700 -13 — STORAGE WEST The applicant proposes to demolish an existing two -story office /storage building on a property developed as a self - storage establishment and construct a three -story self - storage building in its place including related site improvements. LOCATION: 681 S. Tustin Street NOTE: The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32) because it consists of a project that can be characterized as in -fill development meeting the following criteria: (1) the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable Zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 03 -14 approving the demolition of an existing two -story office /storage building to construct a three -story self - storage unit building including related site improvements. Discussion: Contract Planner Anne Fox presented a project overview consistent with the Staff Report. The applicant was present to answer questions from the commissioners. A motion was made to approve Planning Commission Resolution 03 -14. MOTION: Commissioner Cathcart SECOND: Commissioner Gladson AYES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa, Cathcart, & Gladson NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Steiner MOTION CARRIED c' Planning Commission March 3, 2014 4. CONTINUED ITEMS: 4.1 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA 2009 -002 — INCLUDES AMENDMENTS TO THE EAST ORANGE AND ORANGE PARK ACRES PLANS), ZONE CHANGE (ZC 1254 -09), SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 001 -09), TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM 2012 -101), TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17344 (TTM 0025 -09), MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW (MJSP 0595 -09), DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC 4413 -09), DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA 5825) AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR 1818 -09) — RIO SANTIAGO This item was continued from the February 19, 2014 Regular Meeting, January 27, 2014 Special Session, January 20, 2014 Regular Meeting and the Special Session on January 13, 2014. The applicant proposes to change the General Plan and Zoning Designations for the 110 acre site and create a Specific Plan that would allow: a maximum of 130 single family homes; a maximum of 265 senior (age- restricted) housing units that could include up to a three story building; pay- for -use private recreational facilities which could include up to an 81,000 square foot building; and, open space areas north of and including Santiago Creek. Publicly available trails, publicly available open space and private streets are also proposed as part of the project. LOCATION: 6118 East Santiago Canyon Road NOTE: The project is subject to environmental review per the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Public Scoping Meeting Notice regarding the project were distributed to the public and public agencies via required noticing procedures. The NOP disclosed that the City intends to prepare an EIR for the project pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The public and agency comment period ran from May 14, 2009 to June 12, 2009. A scoping meeting was held on May 14, 2009. As a result of the comments and concerns collected at the May 14, 2009 scoping session and during the public comment period, the applicant revised the project and a new NOP and Public Scoping Meeting Notice were distributed to the public and public agencies via required noticing procedures. The public and agency comment period ran from April 7, 2011 to May 9, 2011. The second scoping meeting was held on April 7, 2011. Comments received at both scoping sessions and during the public and agency comment period are contained in Appendix A of the DEIR. 4 Planning Commission March 3, 2014 Discussion — Commissioners to make recommendations and findings for the City staff utilizing putting together resolutions to be voted on at a later meeting, with said recommendations being sent on to the City Council regarding the proposed Rio Santiago Project. Gary Sheatz, Senior Assistant City Attorney was present to answer questions and concerns from the Commissioners on procedural issues. Environmental Impact Report (EIR 1818 -09) This item was deliberated and a motion was made to deny the item because of the inadequacy of information regarding secondary affects, safety and traffic presented to the Commissioners. MOTION: Commissioner Gladson SECOND: Commissioner Correa AYES: None NOES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa & Gladson ABSENT: Commissioners Cathcart and Steiner MOTION CARRIED General Plan Amendment (GPA 2009 -002) (Areas A, B, C & D amendments) After deliberation, a motion was made to deny those actions. MOTION: Commissioner Gladson SECOND: Commissioner Correa AYES: None NOES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa & Gladson ABSENT: Commissioners Cathcart and Steiner MOTION CARRIED Zone Change (ZC 1254 -09) and Specific Plan (SP 001 -09) MOTION: Commissioner Correa SECOND: Commissioner Gladson AYES: None NOES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa & Gladson ABSENT: Commissioners Cathcart & Steiner MOTION CARRIED f.7 Planning Commission March 3, 2014 Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 2012 -101), Tentative Tract Map 17344 (TTM 0025 -09) and Major Site Plan Review (MJSP 0595 -09) and Design Review Committee (DRC 4413 -09) Commissioners deliberated and a motion was made to deny the items. MOTION: Commissioner Gladson SECOND: Commissioner Buttress AYES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa & Gladson NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Cathcart and Steiner MOTION CARRIED 4.2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 5825 — RIO SANTIAGO This item was continued from the February 19, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. Development Agreement 5825 is a proposed contractual agreement between the City and the applicant consistent with the requirements of the Orange Municipal Code. DA 5825 would vest development rights for the Rio Santiago project and would require conveyance of land for public use. Discussion: Assistant City Manager Rick Otto presented a project overview consistent with the staff report. Ken Ryan, KTGY, applicant's representative was present to answer questions from the commissioners. Discussion — Vice -Chair Buttress opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposed project. Laura Thomas, President of the Orange Park Association — Opposed Commissioners deliberated and a motion was made to deny the Development Agreement. MOTION: Commissioner Gladson SECOND: Commissioner Correa AYES: None NOES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa, & Gladson ABSENT: Commissioners Cathcart and Steiner MOTION CARRIED 6 Planning Commission March 3, 2014 5. ADJOURNMENT: Planning Commission adjourned to the next regularly scheduled meeting on Monday, March 17, 2014. MOTION: Commissioner Gladson SECOND: Commissioner Correa AYES: Commissioners Buttress, Correa, & Gladson NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Cathcart and Steiner Meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. MOTION CARRIED 7