Loading...
2018-06-06 DRC Final Minutes CITY OF ORANGE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - FINAL June 6, 2018 Committee Members Present: Anne McDermott—Vice Chair Robert Imboden Carol Fox Committee Members Absent: Tim McCormack Mary Anne Skorpanich Staff in Attendance: Bill Crouch, Community Development Director Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director Marissa Moshier, Historic Preservation Planner Jennifer Scudellari, Executive Assistant Administrative Session —5:00 1. Vice chair McDermott opened the Administrative Session at 5:00 p.m. and inquired about the Policy/Procedural Information. • Marissa Moshier, Historic Preservation Planner advised there are no changes to the agenda and nothing to report. Committee Members stated there were no edits to the May 16, 2018 meeting minutes. Committee Member Fox made a motion to close the Administrative Session of the Design Review Committee meeting. SECOND: Imboden AYES: Imboden, McDermott, and Fox NOES: None ABSENT: McCormack, Skorpanich MOTION CARRIED. Administrative Session adjourned at 5:03 p.m. City of Orange—Design Review Committee Final Meeting Minutes for June 6, 2018 Page 2 of 5 Regular Session—5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Committee Members Imboden, McDermott and Fox were present. Committee Member McCormack and Skorpanich were absent PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Opportunity for Members of the public to address the Design Review Committee on matters not listed on the Agenda. There were no speakers. CONSENT ITEMS: (1) APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 16, 2018. Committee Member Fox made a motion to approve the minutes from the Design Review Committee meeting of May 16, 2018 as written. SECOND: Imboden AYES: Imboden, Fox and McDermott NOES: None ABSENT : Skorpanich and McCormack MOTION CARRIED. AGENDA ITEMS: Continued Items: None City �f Orange—Design Review Committee Final Meeting Minutes for June 6, 2018 Page 3 of 5 New AEenda Items: (2) DESIGN REVIEW NO. 4864-16—999 TOWN & COLTNTRY MIXED USE • A request to modify approved plans for a new five-level parking structure to eliminate the screen in association with a horizontal mixed-use development that also in�ludes a new five- story residential apartment building. The project was approved by the DRC on June 7, 2017. • 999 W. Town and Country Road • Staff Contact: Anna Pehoushek, (714) 744-7228 • DRC Action: The DRC may take one of three actions: 1) Approve the removal of the green screens as presented; 2) Deny the request and affirm the originally approved green screen; or 3) Provide feedback on an alternative aesthetic treatment far the north elevation of the parking structure, and require the suggested treatment to return to the Committee for approval. Anna Pehoushek, Assistant �Community Development Director provided an explanation of the project consistent with the staff report. Staff is looking to the Design Review Committee to accept the removal of the green screen or provide guidance about the adornment that is appropriate for the parking structure. Vice Chair McDermott invited the applicant to step forward. Ryan Childs stated they would be installing approximately 43 bamboo plants that will grow 35 to 40 feet tall within three years. Therefore, the green screen or other aesthetic treatment were not needed. Vice Chair McDermott opened the public comment; there were no speakers. Committee Member asked staff for clarification on the requirements of the horizontal mixed-use in terms of visual or physical connectiveness and can the parking structure open before any treatment is applied. Ms. Pehoushek, stated the objective is for the sites to pull together as a unified product even if they are constructed at different points in time. As for the parking structure, the approval of the project requires that the parking structure be completed before apartments are issued building permits. Functionally, the structure could open. The DRC could separate the parking structure from the apartments and allow a temporary certificate of occupancy for the structure with the aesthetic treatment coming forward at the later date. Committee Members and staff discussed the sustainability of the trees on Caltrans property, and questioned how much planting space the applicant has control of in the easement. Committee Member Imboden asked about the proposed dog park that was in the prior submittal and the applicant stated it will occur in Phase 2;the developer will use that as part of their amenities credit which will be s�ared with leasing and visitor parking. City of Orange—Design Review Committee Final Meeting Minutes for June 6,2018 Page 4 of 5 The Committee Members stated they did not feel comfortable with placement of bamboo in relation to the usable space in the dog park. The Committee felt that if it's going to be a park, an enlarged drawing would be helpful to clarify the placement of the planting versus the useable space. Ms. Pehoushek stated there is an interim landscape condition related to construction of the parking structure and the dog park area when the final landscape and lighting plan return, the DRC will have another opportunity to review the final details of the dog park space. Committee Members and the applicant discussed the placement and number of green screens, and noted discrepancies with regard to the number and location of green screens. Committee Members agreed that the applicant should provide some kind of architectural rectangular panels on the garage that fulfills the same objective as a green screen. Committee Members felt the proposal has evolved and is now a blank parking structure;there isn't anything that links the parking structure and apartments and it doesn't feel like a cohesive design theme on the whole campus. Committee Members struggled with what seems like a disjointed effort between the buildings. The Committee worked with this project on several occasions to try to get a relationship between the existing buildings. The concept that is shown in the approved documents and the design intent that was shown has been watered down substantially to where it doesn't deliver that intent any longer. The Committee Members agreed that the applicant cannot rely on neighboring trees to mitigate landscape. The applicant stated he would like to continue the item and work with the apartment developer and hopes they can get Temporary Certificate of Occupancy on the parking structure. Ms. Pehoushek clarified that the apartment design program includes louvered panels. Over the course of the last several weeks one of the options for the parking structure was to replace the green screens with fabric panels. The applicant will be working with the apartment developer on different treatment concepts; it would be helpful for the DRC to provide some feedback on the use of fabric versus some other more durable material. Committee Members stated that the use of graphic panels led to concerns about what those graphics would be. They are also concerned about the maintenance of the fabric, so the louvered panels may be mare practical. The applicant stated the fabric panels have a 15 year warranty against sun and tearing can have the graphic of their choosing. City of Orange—Design Review Committee Final Meeting Minutes for June 6,2018 Page 5 of 5 Committee Member Fox made a motion to continue Design Review No. 4864-16 —999 Town & Country Mixed Use, to a future date in order for the applicant to make changes from feedback given from the Design Review Committee. SECOND: Imboden AYES: Imboden, Fox and McDermott NOES: None ABSENT: Skorpanich and McCormack MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Committee Member Imboden made a motion to adjourn at 6:30 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled on Wednesday, June 20, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. SECOND: Imboden AYES: Imboden, Fox and McDermott NOES: None ABSENT: Skorpanich and McCormack MOTION CARRIED. Meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Adjourn to the next regular meeting on Wednesday, June 20, 2018