04-15-19 Sunrise Senior Assisted Living CUP 3091-19 1301 E. Lincoln Ave.MAJOR SITE PLAN (MJSP 0958-18)
CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP 3091-19)
DESIGN REVIEW (DRC 4959-18)
DENSITY BONUS AND WAIVERS (NO CASE NUMBERS REQUIRED)
RESOLUTION NO. PC 03-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ORANGE APPROVING MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 0958-
18, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3091-19, DESIGN REVIEW NO.
4959-18, A DENSITY BONUS, THREE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
WAIVERS, AND THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING 13,414
SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
A 93-UNIT, 120 BED, 74,514 SQUARE FOOT, SENIOR ASSISTED
LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY WITH 62 COVERED
PARKING SPACES LOCATED AT 1301 E. LINCOLN AVENUE
APPLICANT: 1301 E. LINCOLN, LLC
Moved by Commissioner ________________ and seconded by Commissioner
________________ that the following resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has authority per Orange Municipal Code (OMC)
Table 17.08.020, as further reinforced in OMC Section 17.08.020 B.2.b and, OMC Section
17.15.060B. to approve Major Site Plan Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-
19, Design Review No. 4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three development standard Waivers for a
93-unit, 120 bed, 74,154 square foot senior assisted living and memory care facility known as
Sunrise Senior Living and Memory Care at 1301 E. Lincoln Avenue; and
WHEREAS, Major Site Plan Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-19,
Design Review No. 4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three Waivers were filed by 1301 E. Lincoln,
LLC in accordance with the provisions of the City of Orange Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Major Site Plan Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-19,
Design Review No. 4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three Waivers were processed in the time and
manner prescribed by state and local law; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to January 9, 2019, the City’s Streamlined Multidisciplinary
Accelerated Review Team (SMART) determined that Major Site Plan Review No. 0958-18,
Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-19, Design Review No. 4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three
Waivers met the requirements of the Orange Municipal Code and deemed the application
complete; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2019, and March 20, 2019, the Design Review Committee
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 2
reviewed Design Review No. 4959-18 and recommended that the Planning Commission approve
the application subject to recommended conditions and findings; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposal for Major Site Plan
Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-19, Design Review No. 4959-18, a
Density Bonus, and three Waivers at a public meeting on April 15, 2019, for property located at
1301 E. Lincoln Avenue, which is currently identified as Assessor Parcel Number 360-363-05,
and legally described in Attachment A of this resolution; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission approves Major
Site Plan Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-19, Design Review Committee
No. 4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three Waivers to construct a 93-unit, 120 bed, 74,154 square
foot senior assisted living and memory care facility known as Sunrise Senior Living and Memory
Care located at 1301 E. Lincoln Avenue. The approval is based on the following findings:
SECTION 1 – FINDINGS
General Plan
1. The project must be consistent with the goals and policies stated within the City’s
General Plan.
The proposed project supports the goals of the existing General Plan Housing Element
and Land Use Element by fulfilling a range of housing density and type to the diverse
needs and lifestyles of residents; utilizes buffering techniques; removes governmental
constraints to housing development through the use of a Density Bonus, waivers or
reductions; and, provides a housing option for Orange’s aging population which was
identified in the needs assessment in the Housing Element. Although the proposed floor
area ratio exceeds the 1.0 maximum established by the General Plan for the General
Commercial district, accommodations are made in State law and the Orange Municipal
Code for exceedance of maximum density for the sake of creating housing opportunities
for seniors.
Major Site Plan Review
2. The project design is compatible with surrounding development and neighborhoods.
The project utilizes contemporary architectural design that is comparable to surrounding
buildings and incorporates high quality elements that respond to the site’s topography,
neighborhood adjacency, and street presence. The project includes appropriate setbacks;
utilizes appropriate building materials typical for or desired for building improvements in
the neighborhood; provides an integrated landscape theme; uses landscaping to buffer
massing of the project from surrounding uses; provides for adequate on-site circulation
and parking; and, presents no conflicts with surrounding uses.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 3
The site is designed with sensitivity to community aesthetics. The architecture for the
building utilizes a consistent and repetitive theme of colors, materials, shapes, and form.
The building is designed with subterranean elements, and places the largest three-story
massing along Lincoln Avenue. The appearance of height dissipates as the building
recedes into the cut slope such that at the north end of the site. The Lincoln Avenue face
of the property will blend in with the higher elevation of the park and its existing mature
trees. The 15-foot setback of the building from Lincoln Avenue will lessen the massing
at the street. The recesses and alternating colors and materials at the street front will
further reduce the appearance of mass. Oceanview Avenue will provide a distance
separation between the building mass and the buildings to the west.
Trees and shrubs are planted in targeted landscape focal areas, as well as groundcover, to
provide a visual enhancement to the site and streetscape, and also facilitates the project’s
integration with the surrounding context.
3. Major Site Plan approval shall be granted if the project conforms to City development
standards and any applicable special design guidelines or specific plan requirements.
With the density bonus and, development standard waivers the project conforms to the
City Development Standards of the Office Professional (OP) zone including but not
limited to: floor area ratio, setbacks, parking, and landscaping.
Without the density bonus and, development standard waivers, the plan would not
comply with the OP zone Development Standards for floor area ratio, building height,
number of stories, and tree count; however, these items are allowed under the Density
Bonus provisions of OMC Chapter 17.15 and California’s State density bonus law,
codified in the California Government Code at Sections 65915-65918 for a “senior
citizen housing development.”
4. Major Site Plan approval shall be granted if the project provides for safe and adequate
vehicular and pedestrian circulation, both on- and off-site.
Access to the site would occur exclusively from Oceanview Avenue. No entry to the site
would be authorized from Lincoln Avenue except for emergency vehicle access. As
determined by City Fire Department and Public Works Department staff, under the
proposed design, all site tenants, occupants, service providers, waste hauling vehicles
and, emergency service vehicles will be able to safely and adequately access the site.
The project does not affect any level of service for streets in the vicinity of the project as
documented in the traffic impact analysis generated for the project.
5. Major Site Plan approval shall be granted if City services are available and adequate to
serve the project.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 4
City services are adequate to provide services for the proposed project. The site is served
by adequate water, sewer, electricity and dry utilities. The applicant is required through
conditions of approval to upgrade the waterline along the project’s Oceanview Avenue
frontage. Fire, Police, and other City department impact fees will be paid in conjunction
with building permit fees.
6. Major Site Plan approval shall be granted if the project has been designed to fully
mitigate or substantially minimize adverse environmental effects.
No adverse environmental effects were identified resulting from project implementation.
The project was reviewed against the criteria for a Categorical Exemption. The proposed
project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines 15332 (Class 32 – In-fill Development
Projects) as detailed in Section 2 of this Resolution. Additionally, traffic, noise, air
quality, public services, and utilities assessments were prepared for the project and
concluded that the project would not result in impacts, supporting the Class 32
exemption.
Conditional Use Permit
1. A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted upon sound principles of land use and in
response to services required by the community.
The assisted living/memory care facility is sited in an appropriate location along an
underdeveloped commercial corridor next to a park and residential neighborhood.
Resident-serving uses in proximity to the site include the park, grocery shopping,
hospitals, medical offices, and service uses. The site is also close to the State Route 55
Freeway. The proposed project supports the goals of the existing General Plan Housing
Element and Land Use Element by fulfilling a range of housing density and type to the
diverse needs and lifestyles of residents; utilizes buffering techniques; removes
governmental constraints to housing development through the use of a Density Bonus,
and development standard waivers; and, provides a housing option for Orange’s aging
population which was identified in the needs assessment in the Housing Element.
2. A Conditional Use Permit shall not be granted if it will cause deterioration of bordering
land uses or create special problems for the area in which it is located.
The site is designed with sensitivity to community aesthetics. The architecture for the
building utilizes a consistent and repetitive theme of colors, materials, shapes, and form.
The building is designed with subterranean elements, and places the largest three-story
massing at the lowest point of the property at the south end facing Lincoln Avenue. The
appearance of height dissipates as the building recedes into the cut slope at the north end
of the site. The Lincoln Avenue face of the property will blend in with the higher
elevation of the park and its existing mature trees. The 15-foot setback of the building
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 5
from Lincoln Avenue will lessen the massing at the street. The recesses and alternating
colors and materials at the street front will further reduce the appearance of mass.
Oceanview Avenue will provide a distance separation between the building mass and the
buildings to the west.
Trees and shrubs are planted in targeted landscape focal areas, as well as groundcover to
provide a visual enhancement to the site and streetscape, and also facilitate the projects
integration with the surrounding context.
The project proposes a fence that will appear no higher than six feet tall from adjacent
grade and no visual impact is expected from the fence as viewed from exterior properties.
3. A Conditional Use Permit must be considered in relationship to its effect on the
community or neighborhood plan for the area in which it is located.
There is no community or neighborhood plan for the area. However, as stated in the
General Plan finding, the project is consistent with and implements the General Plan.
4. A Conditional Use Permit, if granted, shall be made subject to those conditions necessary
to preserve the general welfare, not the individual welfare of any particular applicant.
Conditions are placed on the project to ensure necessary infrastructure is provided, to
ensure safety of users, to ensure quality aesthetic design and landscaping is implemented,
and to ensure that the property is maintained in perpetuity. Conditions also ensure the
City is compensated for services provided for the construction and use of the property.
Design Review Committee
1. In the Old Towne Historic District, the proposed work conforms to the prescriptive
standards and design criteria referenced and/or recommended by the DRC or other
reviewing body for the project (OMC 17.10.070.F.1).
The project is not in the Old Towne Historic District, therefore this finding is not
applicable.
2. In any National Register Historic District, the proposed work complies with the Secretary
of the Interior’s standards and guidelines (OMC 17.10.07.F.2).
The project is not in a National Register Historic District, therefore this finding is not
applicable.
3. The project design upholds community aesthetics through the use of an internally
consistent, integrated design theme and is consistent with all adopted specific plans,
applicable design standards, and their required findings (OMC 17.10.07.F.3).
The site is designed with sensitivity to community aesthetics and area topography. The
architecture for the building has been developed in a manner that responds to surrounding
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 6
residential neighborhoods as well as the eclectic character of the Lincoln Avenue
Commercial Corridor. The colors, materials, forms, and articulation function to break up
the massing of the building into smaller modules that are more representative of the
surrounding development. The building is designed to place the largest three-story
massing at the south end facing Lincoln Avenue.
The proposed landscape scheme incorporates trees, shrubs, and groundcover in key
locations to provide a visual transition from the project site to the adjacent park and
neighborhood.
There is no specific plan or applicable design standards applicable to this property.
4. For infill residential development, as specified in the City of Orange Infill Residential
Design Guidelines, the new structure(s) or addition are compatible with the scale,
massing, orientation, and articulation of the surrounding development and will preserve
or enhance existing neighborhood character (OMC 17.10.07.F.4).
The project not an infill residential project. Therefore, this finding does not apply.
Waivers
1. The development standard being waived would otherwise preclude or inhibit the
construction of the housing development with the density bonus to which the housing
development is entitled and that are needed to make the housing development
economically feasible.
Without waivers for building height and stories, fewer rooms for seniors would result
which would not make the project financially viable. Furthermore, Orange Municipal
Code Section 17.18.120 would otherwise allow the Planning Commission to grant a
Conditional Use Permit for greater height and stories. The development standard waiver
granting for fewer trees facilitates more building area on the parcel which helps make the
project more economically feasible because more area is dedicated to housing than to
landscaping.
2. The project meets the threshold requirements of the definition of a waiver or reduction as
defined in Orange Municipal Code Section 17.15.020.
Orange Municipal Code Section 17.15.020 defines Waivers and Reductions as
“Modifications to development standards that would otherwise preclude construction of
the housing development with the density bonus and concessions and incentives to which
the housing development is entitled and that are needed to make the housing development
economically feasible. Waivers and reductions are not limited to housing developments
containing affordable units and may be requested by any applicant requesting a density
bonus, including bonuses for a senior housing development, a condominium conversion
and a child care facility.” The project does not provide affordable units but does qualify
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 7
for a density bonus as a senior citizen housing development. The development standard
waivers are needed per the justification in the above finding.
3. The project would not have a specific adverse impact as defined in paragraph (2) of
subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5 of the Government Code, upon health, safety or the
physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate
or avoid the specific adverse impact.
There is no adverse impact on public health or safety as a result of the project. There are
no state or federal laws that the project conflicts with. The project site is not designated
for agriculture or resource preservation, nor is adjacent land on at least two sides. The
project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning ordinance.
4. The project will not have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the
California Register of Historical Resources.
The property or adjacent properties are not listed in the California Register of Historical
Resources and the nearest designated property is over a quarter of a mile away.
SECTION 2 – ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Categorical Exemption: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines 15332 (Class 32 –
In-fill Development Projects) because the project meets the following criteria:
a. With the allowed density bonus, the project is consistent with the existing General Plan
designations, General Plan policies and, applicable zoning designations and regulations.
b. The project is in the City on a site less than five acres and is substantially surrounded by
urban uses.
c. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threated species.
d. The project has been evaluated for significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality,
and water quality and no significant effects have been identified.
e. The site would be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
The project would not trigger any exceptions of State CEQA Guidelines 15300.2 based on
location, cumulative impacts, significant effects, location near a scenic highway, location on a
hazardous waste site, or causing substantial adverse change to a historical resource because the
project is not on an environmentally sensitive site, does not contribute to cumulative impacts,
will not have a significant effect on the environment, is not near a scenic highway, is not on
hazardous waste site, and is not a historical resources site. No environmental public review is
required.
Additional support for the conclusions of the Categorical Exemption are expanded in the
Categorical Exemption justification included as Attachment 4 to the Planning Commission staff
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 8
report, which summarizes the findings of technical studies prepared for the project addressing
traffic, noise, air quality, public services, and utilities.
SECTION 3– CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following conditions are imposed with the
recommendation of approval:
General Conditions
1. The project shall conform in substance and be maintained in general conformance with
plans and exhibits approved by the Planning Commission, including any modifications
required by conditions of approval, as approved by the Planning Commission. Any
future expansion in area or in the nature and operation of the use approved by Major Site
Plan Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-19, Design Review No.
4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three development standard Waivers shall require the
applicable application.
2. The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its officers, agents
and employees from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City
arising out of its approval of this permits, save and except that caused by the City’s active
negligence. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or
proceedings and shall cooperate fully in the defense.
3. Any modifications to the plans including, but not limited to, the landscaping and parking
as a result of City Department requirements such as Building Codes, water quality, Fire,
or Police shall be submitted for review and approval to the Community Development
Director or designee. Should the modifications be considered substantial, the
modifications shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.
4. Except as otherwise provided herein, this project is approved as a precise plan. After any
application has been approved, if changes are proposed regarding the location or
alteration of any use or structure, a changed plan may be submitted to the Community
Development Director for approval. If the Community Development Director determines
that the proposed change complies with the provisions and the spirit and intent of the
approval action, and that the action would have been the same for the changed plan as for
the approved plan, the Community Development Director may approve the changed plan
without requiring a new public hearing.
5. The project approval includes certain fees and/or other exactions. Pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020, these conditions or requirements constitute written
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 9
notice of the fees and/or exactions. The applicant is hereby notified that the ninety (90)
day protest period commencing from the date of approval of the project has begun. If the
applicant fails to file a protest regarding these conditions or requirements, the applicant is
legally barred from later challenging such exactions per Government Code Section
66020.
Community Development Department
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans submitted for building plan check shall
show that a six foot high tube steel or wood fence is placed atop the proposed retaining
walls along the easterly property lines of the site to prevent a falling danger into the site
from Eisenhower Park which slopes downward into the site. The fence shall be
constructed in a secure manner that meets approval of the Building Official and meets the
needs of the Community Services Department. All fences shall be maintained in
perpetuity by the applicant and successors to property ownership.
7. Prior to building permit issuance, plans submitted for building plan check shall show that
project fencing abutting Eisenhower Park shall utilize pilasters spaced at a minimum of
eight feet. Fencing shall be six feet tall.
8. Prior to building permit issuance, the landscape architect shall demonstrate that planting
areas shown on plans approved by the Planning Commission will be capable of
sustaining Canary Pine trees at maturity. Should a demonstration not be accomplished to
the satisfaction of the City’s Senior Landscape Project Coordinator, the project landscape
architect shall demonstrate a tree of equal height, canopy, growth, and water needs and
shall receive approval from the Senior Landscape Project Coordinator for the
substitution. Should a substitution not be found, a building permit may not be issued
until Design Review Committee approval of an alternate landscape plan o ccurs. All trees
approved under Major Site Plan Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-
19, Design Review No. 4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three development standard
Waivers shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced in-kind if lost, for any
reason.
9. Prior to building permit issuance, plans submitted for building plan check shall revert to a
tree count in the courtyard area equal to 14. In reducing the number of trees the
landscape architect shall demonstrate that discretion was exercised in regards to mature
growth, spacing and size of the respected trees to prevent overcrowding, excessive shade,
and the potential of having to remove trees as they develop/grow. The plans shall be
approved by the Senior Landscape Project Coordinator prior to building permit issuance.
10. In conjunction with the operation of the business , should parking issues arise on the site
or the surrounding neighborhood, the applicant shall work with the Community
Development Department to resolve any issues. Employee parking shall not occur on the
adjacent Eisenhower park public parking lot.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 10
11. In conjunction with the operation of the business, all loading and unloading (i.e.
deliveries) activities shall only occur in the designated loading zone on the subject site.
12. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Community Development Director that all mechanical and air conditioning equipment
shall be shielded and screened from view from adjacent streets and properties. The
screening shall be integrated architecturally with the building.
13. The term “applicant” shall refer to the entity that requests approval of this action or any
successor in interest to this approval.
14. A project entry gate(s), other than at secondary emergency vehicle access and emergency
evacuation points, are prohibited without Design Review Committee consideration and
Planning Commission approval.
15. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) governs the taking, killing, possession,
transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests. The trees
that would be removed as part of the project have the potential to provide suitable nesting
opportunities for nesting birds. To comply with the MBTA, in the event that vegetation
and tree removal should occur between January 15 and September 15 (nesting season),
the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey no
more than three days prior to commencement of construction activities. The biologist
conducting the clearance survey shall document any negative results. If no active bird
nests are observed on the project site or within the vicinity during the clearance survey, a
brief letter report shall be submitted to the City of Orange Community Development
Department prior to construction, indicating that no impacts to active bird nests would
occur before construction can proceed. If an active avian nest is discovered during the
pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities shall stay outs ide of a 300-foot
buffer around the active nest. For listed and raptor species, this buffer shall be 500 feet.
A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to
monitor the active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by the
construction activity, pursuant to the MBTA. Prior to the commencement of construction
activities and the issuance of any permits, results of the pre-construction survey and any
subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the City of Orange Community Development
Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other appropriate agencies.
Design Review
16. Subsequent modifications to the approved architecture and color scheme shall be
submitted for review and approval to the Community Development Director or designee.
Should the modifications be considered substantial, the modifications shall be reviewed
by the Design Review Committee.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 11
17. The fencing, planters and potential safety conditions for the drive aisle, as well as the
fencing along the park side of the property shall return to the Design Review Committee
for further review prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Trash Enclosures
18. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
City that coordination has occurred with CC & R to schedule trash collection from the
site the number of time necessary to ensure that waste, refuse, organics, and recycling
materials are collected to prevent container overflow on-site.
19. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit and receive approval from the
Community Development Director for a Waste Reduction Plan. The applicant shall
coordinate with the City’s recycling coordinator to develop a plan to employ measures to
reduce the amount of construction generated waste.
Police Department
20. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall schedule a light reading
inspection with the Orange Police Crime Prevention Bureau. Lighting on the premise
shall be installed in such a way to direct, control, and screen the lighting to prevent off
site light spillage onto adjoining properties. The lighting shall be tested and confirmed
to determine if the lighting meets or exceeds the exterior boundary standards. The
applicant shall use shielding so as to ensure that the light standards meet the requirements
of OMC Section 17.12.030 for the areas beyond the property’s exterior boundaries; light
spillage or pollution to surrounding residential areas shall not exceed a maintained
minimum of 0.5 foot-candle.
21. The project landscape plan shall be reviewed at plan check to confirm that defensive
landscaping is utilized at the Lincoln Avenue and Oceanview Avenue-adjacent corner of
the site, where the retaining wall provides hiding opportunities near the front of the
building located at the west corner of the site, south of the motor court.
Fire Department
22. The Fire Department notes provided to the project applicant shall be provided within the
plans submitted for Building Plan Check. However, the plans shall comply with current
Fire Codes regardless of the codes quoted in the any previously provided
communications.
Public Works Department, Water Division
23. To meet the required fire flow demands, the water main in Oceanview Avenue, for the
extent of the property length, shall be upgraded to 8-inch diameter water main. This
shall be indicated on the project utility plan prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 12
24. Prior to approval of the water improvement plan, the applicant shall satisfy all water
construction bond requirements for the installation of the public water system
improvements as determined by the Water Division.
25. Prior to approval of the water improvement plan, the applicant shall furnish a dedicated
and graded fifteen-foot (15) minimum unencumbered access and utility easement that
will be contiguous to an existing City right-of-way and/or easements as determined by
the Water Division for all existing City water facilities that will remain and all proposed
City water facilities, including main meters, detector checks and fire hydrants. The
applicant shall enter into a Grant of Easement and Agreement with the City of Orange as
approved by the Water Division.
26. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the applicant shall construct all public and/or
private improvements to the satisfaction of the Water Division. The applicant may be
required to enter into an agreement with the City of Orange, and post security in a form
and amount acceptable to the City Engineer and/or Water Division to ensure construction
of said improvements.
27. Plans submitted during plan check shall show that the minimum separation requirements
are met and that each of the various designer’s plan sets match. The applicant’s
consultant preparing the improvement and utility plans shall coordinate their plans with
the consultants preparing the landscape, architectural, surface water quality management,
fire master and/or fire suppression plans so that their designs are consistent.
28. Prior to issuance of precise grading permits, the applicant shall submit a groundwater
survey of the entire site to the Water Division for review and approval. The analysis
shall be prepared by a geotechnical engineer versed in groundwater analysis and shall
include the following information and analysis:
a. Potential for perched groundwater intrusion into the shallow groundwater zone
upon built-out.
b. Analysis for relief of groundwater buildup and properties of soil materials on-site.
c. Impact of groundwater potential on building and structural foundations.
d. Proposed mitigation to avoid potential for groundwater intrusion within five feet
of the bottom of the footings.
29. At least fourteen calendar days prior to commencing construction, the applicant’s civil
engineer shall prepare and provide product material submittals consistent with the water
improvement plans for all proposed public water system facilities to the Water Division
per the City of Orange General Water Construction Notes for review and approval.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 13
Public Works Water Quality Division
30. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits the applicant shall submit a Priority Project
WQMP for review and approval to the Public Works Department that:
a. Prioritizes the use of Low Impact Development principles as follows: preserves
natural features; minimizes runoff and reduces impervious surfaces; and utilizes
infiltration of runoff as the method of pollutant treatment. Infiltration BMPs to be
considered include the use of permeable materials such as concrete and concrete
pavers, infiltration trenches, infiltration planters, and other infiltration BMPs as
applicable,
b. Incorporates the applicable Site Design, Routine Source, Structural Control and
Low Impact BMPs as defined in the Model Water Quality Management Plan and
Technical Guidance Document,
c. Maintains the hydrologic characteristics of the site by matching time of
concentration, runoff, velocity, volume and hydrograph for a 2-year storm event,
d. Minimizes the potential increase in downstream erosion and avoids downstream
impacts to physical structures, aquatic and riparian habitat,
e. Generally describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for
structural and Treatment Control BMPs,
f. Identifies the entity or employees that will be responsible for long-term operation,
maintenance, repair and or replacement of the structural and Treatment Control
BMPs and the training that qualifies them to operate and maintain the BMPs,
g. Describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of
all structural and Treatment Control BMPs,
h. Includes a copy of the forms to be used in conducting maintenance and inspection
activities,
i. Meets recordkeeping requirements (forms to be kept for 5 years).
j. Includes a copy of the form to be submitted annually by the project owner to the
Public Works Department that certifies that the project’s structural and treatment
BMPs are being inspected and maintained in accordance with the project’s
WQMP.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 14
Public Works Right-of-Way Division
31. A parcel map shall be prepared and recorded within 24 months after project approval and
prior to issuance of building permits to combine the lot lines within the project
boundaries.
Public Works Subdivision Division
32. The applicant shall submit a grading plan in compliance with City standards for review
and approval by the Public Works Director. All grading and improvements on the subject
property shall be made in accordance with the Manual of Grading and Standard Plans and
Specifications to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.
33. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the applicant shall submit to, and receive approval of, a
hydrology report from the Public Works Director or designee for existing and proposed
conditions. The existing drainage patterns shall be maintained for proposed conditions.
Design of drains behind the retaining walls should be sized to handle 100-year storm
event.
34. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, a sewer capacity analysis shall be submitted to,
and be approved by, the Public Works Director or designee to ensure sufficient sewer
service can be provided by the public sewer system.
35. The applicant shall install new streetlights, or upgrade existing streetlights, as required by
City of Orange Traffic Division. The applicant shall install street lights in the adjacent
right-of-way pursuant to City Standard Plan No. 415. Installation shall be shown on
plans submitted at building plan check and shall occur at the applicant’s cost.
In addition to the above conditions, procedural conditions contained in Attachment B are to be
fulfilled by the applicant.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 15
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted on April 15, 2019 by the
Planning Commission of the City of Orange by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
___________________________________
Ernest Glasgow, Planning Commission Chair
___________________________________
Date
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 16
Attachment A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ORANGE, IN THE
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1,2 AND 3 IN BLOCK Q, AND OF LOTS 5 AND 6 IN BLOCK R OF
OLIVE HEIGHTS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 18 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LAS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND THAT
PORTION OF OCEAN VIEW AVENUE AND SHORT STREET, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF
SAID OLIVE HEIGHTS, ABANDONED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, AND THAT PORTION OF THE LAND ALLOTTED TO ASCENSION
SEPULVEDA DE MOTT, IN DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA
ANA, RECORDED IN BOOK B OF JUDGEMENTS OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, WHICH LIES WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY
LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY THE OLIVE MILLING LAND AND
IMPROVEMENT COMPANY TO THE SANTA ANA VALLEY IRRIGATION COMPANY, BY
DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 159, PAGE 267 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK R; THENCE WEST 10
FEET;
THENCE, PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5; SOUTH 0 DEGREES 15’ 20”
WEST 144.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 01’ 57” WEST 145.73 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 19’ 56” EAST 22.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
LINCOLN AVENUE;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 53 DEGREES 00’ 56” EAST 243.74
FEET TO THE WESTERLY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO SAID SANTA ANA
VALLEY IRRIGATION COMPANY;
THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 32 DEGREES 00’ 21” EAST 52.72 FEET TO
AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN;
THENCE NORTH 08 DEGREES 02’ 38” EAST 174.47 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN;
THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 33’ 28” EAST 64.62 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID
ABANDONED SHORT STREET;
THENCE ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 31’ 35” WEST 90.80 FEET TO THE
SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 6 OF SAID BLOCK R;
THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 0 DEGREES 14’
11” EAST 159.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
LOT 5 OF SAID BLOCK R, NORTH 89 DEGREES 46’ 12” WEST 99.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 17
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, A 15.00-FOOT TRIANGULAR SHAPED PARCEL FORMED BY THE
INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE REALIGNED OCEAN VIEW AVENUE WITH THE
NORTH LINE OF LINCOLN AVENUE, AS SAID NORTH LINE IS DEFINED IN THAT CERTAIN
RESOLUTION NO. 3238 OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 1969 IN BOOK
9161 PAGE 218 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AS GRANTED TO
THE CITY OF ORANGE IN THE DEED RECORDED JUNE 29, 1071 IN BOOK 9697, PAGE 958
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM, ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON
SUBSTANCES LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET, WITHOUT ANY RIGHT TO ENTER
UPON THE SURFACE OR THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET
AS PROVIDED IN INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD.
APN: 360-636-05
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 18
Attachment B
PROCEDURAL CONDITIONS
Community Development
1. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, including all City
regulations. Violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for
revocation of this permit.
2. Major Site Plan Review No. 0958-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 3091-19, Design
Review No. 4959-18, a Density Bonus, and three development standard Waivers shall
become void if not vested within two years from the date of approval. Time extensions
may be granted for up to one year, pursuant to OMC Section 17.08.060.
3. These conditions shall be reprinted on the second page of the construction documents
when submitted to the Building Division for the plan check process.
4. The applicant shall submit construction documentation for plan check review and
approval from the Building Official, in accordance with the currently adopted set of
Uniform Building and Fire Codes.
5. Building permits shall be obtained for all construction work, as required by the City of
Orange, Community Development Department’s Building Division. Failure to obtain the
required building permits may be cause for revocation of this entitlement. The applicant
shall pay all plan check and building permit fees.
6. In conjunction with construction, all activity will be limited to the hours between 7:00
a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction activity will be permitted
on Sundays and Federal holidays.
7. Any graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours from the time the City of Orange Notice of
Violation is received by the applicant/property owner.
8. The applicant at all times shall provide the required number of parking spaces shown in
the approved site plan.
9. Prior to building permit issuance, all required parking spaces shall be shown on
construction documents as doubled striped to City standards at the time of approval.
10. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, all parking lot and landscaping improvements shall be
completed according to the approved plans and to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 19
11. In conjunction with the operation of the business, all loading areas and the trash
enclosure shall be maintained and kept clean and free of debris.
12. Prior to the operation of the business the applicant shall file for a business license with
the Business License Division.
13. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the applicant shall pay all of the applicable
Development Impact Fees in accordance with the most current fee schedule.
14. The applicant shall pay school district fees, unless Orange Unified School District
(OUSD) provides written notification to the City that fees have been satisfied.
15. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Planning
Division for any and all signage associated with the proposed project and/or business.
16. In conjunction with the operation of the business the property owner shall be responsible
to maintain the property to a level deemed adequate by the Community Development.
This includes, but is not limited to, the buildings, landscape on-site, recreational facilities,
trash areas, signage, utilities, property walls, and gates.
Police Department
17. Prior to building permit issuance, construction plans shall show that all structures shall
comply with the requirements of Municipal Code (Chapter 15.52 Building Security
Standards), which relates to the use of specific hardware, doors, windows, lighting, etc
(Ord. No. 6-18). Architect drawings shall include sections of the Ordinance that apply
under “Security Notes”. An “Approved Products List 1/17” of hardware, windows, etc is
available upon request.
18. Security and design measures that employ Defensible Space concepts shall be utilized in
development and construction plans. These measures incorporate the concepts of Crime
Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), which involves consideration such
as placement and orientation of structures, access and visibility of common areas,
placement of doors, windows, addressing and landscaping.
Fire Department
19. Plans submitted for Building Plan Check shall comply with the California Fire Code as
amended by the City and as frequently amended and in effect at the time of application
for Building Permit.
20. Prior to building permit issuance, a copy of the approved fire master plan shall be
submitted with the plans submitted for Building Plan Check.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 20
21. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant
location on the street or drive per the City of Orange Standard as approved by the Fire
Chief.
Community Services Department
22. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall prepare a final landscaping and
irrigation plan consistent with the grading plans, site plans, and the conceptual
landscaping plan as proposed for the project for the review and approval by the Director
of Community Development and Community Services Director, or designee.
23. Prior to building permit issuance the final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved
by the Public Works Director when landscaping is proposed within the public right-of-
way and/or the project is constructing Storm Water Quality Best Management Practices
in landscaped areas.
24. Prior to building permit issuance, the final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved
by the Orange Fire Department.
25. Certification from the Landscape Architect of record shall be filed that final landscaping
was completed in compliance with approved landscape and irrigation plan. City of
Orange Staff shall inspect and approve the landscape prior to release.
26. Prior to building permit issuance, final landscaping plans for the project shall be designed
to comply with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines as described in Section
IX et al of the City of Orange Landscape Standards and Specifications.
27. The final landscape plan shall include a note that a fully automated irrigation system will
be provided.
28. Prior to building permit issuance, City required irrigation and landscape inspection notes
shall be placed on the final landscape plan, to the satisfaction of the Community Services
Director.
29. Prior to building permit issuance, a Tree Permit Removal Permit shall be approved by the
Community Service Director in accordance with the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance.
A plan is required for submittal to the City depicting all of the existing on-site trees, the
species of each tree, and the number of trees proposed for removal and replacement.
Public Works Department Water Division
30. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall submit improvement plans to the
Water Division for review and approval for any new fire hydrants, domestic water
services, fire services, landscape services, and any other proposed improvements or
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 21
relocations affecting the public water system facilities.
31. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall be responsible for the installation
and/or relocation of the proposed or existing public water system facilities to a location
and of a design per the improvement plans approved by the Water Division.
32. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall be responsible for the
installation of necessary fire hydrants and fire services as approved by the Fire
Department and Water Division.
33. Prior to building permit issuance, the Water Division shall approve the type and l ocation
of landscaping and fire service (detector check) device for proposed City services.
34. Prior to building permit issuance, construction documents shall show a minimum twenty-
foot (20’) separation from the public water system facilities to the proposed/existing
buildings and structures per the City of Orange Standard Location Of Undergrounding
Utilities Standard and as approved by the Water Division.
35. Prior to building permit issuance, construction documents shall show that the installation
of sewer mains in the vicinity of water mains is done per the Department of Public Works
Water Division Standard No. 113 and will be approved by the Water Division.
36. Prior to building permit issuance, construction documents shall show that a six foot
minimum horizontal clearance and a one foot minimum vertical clearance would be
maintained between City water mains, laterals, services, meters, fire hydrants and all
other utilities except sewer. The Water Division shall review and approve the
construction documents.
37. Prior to building permit issuance, construction documents shall show that an eight-foot
minimum clearance is provided between City water mains, laterals, services, meters, fire
hydrants, signs, or trees or other substantial shrubs and plants as required by the W ater
Division. The Water Division shall review and approve the construction documents.
38. Prior to building permit issuance, construction documents shall show that permanent
signs, awning, surface water quality management features or other structures are not built
over water mains, laterals, services, meters, or fire hydrants as required by the Water
Division.
39. Prior to building permit issuance for the first phase of work, the applicant shall be
responsible for obtaining approval all of the necessary encroachment permits from
affected agencies for all public water construction work.
40. Prior to approval of a water improvement plan, the applicant shall satisfy all water main
connection, plan check, and inspections charges as determined by the Water Division.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 22
41. Plans submitted during plan check shall show that the water improvement plans are
consistent with the fire suppression plans and or fire master plan. The applicant’s
consultant preparing the water improvement plans shall coordinate their plans with the
consultant preparing the fire suppression plans and/or fire master plan so that their
designs concur.
42. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall furnish and install
individual pressure regulators on new services where the incoming pressure exceeds
eighty-pounds per square inch.
Public Works, Water Quality Division
43. Prior to the issuance of certificates for use of occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate
the following to the Public Works Department:
a. That all structural and treatment control best management practices (BMPs)
described in the Project WQMP have been constructed and installed in
conformance with the approved plans and specifications,
b. That the applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs described in
the Project WQMP,
c. That an adequate number of copies of the project’s approved final Project WQMP
are available for the future occupiers.
44. Prior to the issuance of certificates for use of occupancy or final signoff by the Public
Works Department, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of Public Works,
that the preparer of the WQMP has reviewed the BMP maintenance requirements in
Section V of the WQMP with the responsible person and that a copy of the WQMP has
been provided to that person. A certification letter from the WQMP preparer may be used
to satisfy this condition.
45. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall review the approved Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and grading plan to ensure the structure’s
downspouts or drainage outlet locations are consistent with those documents. Copies of
the building or architectural plans specifically showing the downspouts and drainage
outlets shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review.
46. The project applicant shall maintain all structural, treatment and low impact development
BMPs at the frequency specified in the approved WQMP. Upon transfer of ownership or
management responsibilities for the project site, the applicant shall notify the City of
Orange Public Works Department of the new person(s) or entity responsible for
maintenance of the BMPs.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 23
47. Drainage facilities discharging onto adjacent property shall be designed to imitate the
manner in which runoff is currently produced from the project site. Alternatively, the
project applicant may obtain a drainage acceptance and maintenance agreement, suitable
for recordation, from the owner of said adjacent property.
48. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit (including grubbing, clearing, or paving
permits) the applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under the State’s
General Permit for Storm water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity
(General Construction Permit) by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI)
submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent
notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other
proof of filing. A copy of the current SWPPP required by the General Permit shall be
kept at the project site and be available for review by City representatives upon request.
49. Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall identify the location of the grease
interceptor and provide evidence to the Building Official that the design meets and is
consistent with the City's latest adopted building codes.
Public Works Right-of-Way Division
50. The applicant shall not grant an easement(s) over any property subject to a requirement of
easement, dedication, or irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Orange, unless such
easements are expressly made subordinate to the easements or dedication rights of the
City of Orange. Prior to granting any such easements, the applicant shall furnish a copy
of the proposed easement to the Planning Manager, Water Division Manager, and Public
Works Director for review and approval. Further, a copy of the approved easement shall
be furnished to the Planning Manager, Water Division Manager and Public Works
Director prior to the issuance of any certificate of use and occupancy.
Public Works Subdivision Division
51. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall demonstrate that the trash enclosure
shall conform to City Standard Plan 409.
52. The applicant shall coordinate with the City’s solid waste provider for location and
design of service.
53. Any soil imported or exported from the site shall require a separate permit. Prior to
import or export of soil exceeding 30,000 cubic yards, approval shall occur by the City
Council. A dirt haul route shall be approved by the City Council and the travel path is
subjected to pavement deterioration evaluation.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 03-19
Page 24
54. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees to cover plan check and inspection services
related to the grading activities.
55. The grading plan shall detail all of the locations where retaining walls will be
constructed, including height and engineering for each wall, and obtain a building permit
for walls over three (3) feet in height prior to construction.
56. Any grading outside of the property boundaries shall require the applicant to either obtain
slope easements or off-site grading agreements in a form suitable to the Public Works
Director.
57. Rough grading shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works
Director and the graded site shall be released by the City Engineer/Public Works Director
for construction.
58. Certification shall be filed with the City of Orange Public Works that all final grading is
in compliance with the approved grading plan and City standards, to the satisfaction of
the Public Works Director.
59. All public improvements and repairs shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director
of Public Works.
60. Utilities serving the development, such as electric, cable television, street lighting and
communications shall be installed underground, completed and approved by the
appropriate utility provider.
61. Any utilities or easements constructed to serve the project or requiring relocation shall be
completed and accepted by the affected agency and the City of Orange.
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102# DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL10.17.1810.12.2018AuthorCheckerPLANNING SUBMITTALSUNRISE - ORANGESUNRISE SENIOR LIVING1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.ORANGE, CA 92865ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102# DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL10.17.1810.12.2018AuthorCheckerPLANNING SUBMITTALSUNRISE - ORANGESUNRISE SENIOR LIVING1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.ORANGE, CA 92865ELECTRICAL PARKING PLAN
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102# DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL10.17.1810.12.2018AuthorCheckerPLANNING SUBMITTALSUNRISE - ORANGESUNRISE SENIOR LIVING1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.ORANGE, CA 92865ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRICS
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102# DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL10.17.1810.12.2018AuthorCheckerPLANNING SUBMITTALSUNRISE - ORANGESUNRISE SENIOR LIVING1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.ORANGE, CA 92865ELECTRICAL PARKING PLAN PHOTOMETRICS
CITY OF ORANGE
CLASS 32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT**
CASE NO.: Major Site Plan Review No. 0959-18
PROJECT APPLICANT: 1301 E Lincoln, LLC
Attn: Greg McCafferty
2390 E Orangewood Avenue, Suite 510
Anaheim, CA 92806
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1301 E Lincoln Avenue
Orange, CA 92865
APN(s): 360-363-05
PROJECT LOCATION: The Project Site is located at 1301 E Lincoln Avenue, Orange, CA 92865,
approximately 1,000 feet west of the centerline of N Tustin Street.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING: The Project Site is located on the northeast corner
of Lincoln and Oceanview Avenues (1301 E. Lincoln Ave.), in the north central part of Orange.
There is an existing 13,414 SF, two-story office building on the site that fronts on Lincoln
Avenue with parking to the rear. The surrounding setting includes a park (Eisenhower Park),
retail, office and church uses to the east and south, multi-family residential to the west and the
County unincorporated residential uses to the north.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Applicant proposes to demolish and existing 13,414 square foot
office building and associated surface parking area and construct a two to three-story senior
assisted living facility with 74,514 square feet of floor area and 93 assisted living units with a
total of 120 beds (Proposed Project), as shown in Figure 1. The visible building height above
grade ranges from 16.5 feet to 37 feet, with the highest point of the building fronting Lincoln
Avenue. The Proposed Project will provide 24-hour non-medical care for elderly persons in
need of personal services, supervision, protection, or assistance essential for sustaining
activities of daily life. As shown in Figure 2, the lower-level would include a 29,400 square feet
parking area with a total of 62 parking spaces and 16,552 square feet and 18 units of memory
care. As shown in Figure 3, the first floor would include a drop-off area accessed from
Oceanview Avenue, a parking ramp to access the lower level, and 29,584 square feet of
common uses, offices, dining facilities, 62 assisted living units, and an outdoor terrace and
garden patio. As shown in Figure 4, the second floor would include 28,378 square feet of a mix
of 20 assisted living units and 23 memory care units, with additional common space, offices,
dining facilities and an outdoor deck.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONING: Office Professional
Figure 1: Site Plan
Figure 2: Lower Level Site Plan
Figure 3: First Level Site Plan
Figure 4: Second Level Site Plan
INFORMATION DEMONSTRATING THAT THE PROJECT SATISFIES THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED
IN SECTION 15332 OF TITLE 14 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS:
1. Is the project consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general
plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations?
The Proposed Project is consistent with the existing General Commercial General Plan
Designation and OP (Office Professional) Zoning applicable to the Project Site.
2. Is the proposed development located within the City limits on a project site of no more than
five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses?
The Project Site is 1.55-acres, within City limits, and surrounded by urban uses.
3. Does the project site have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species?
The Project Site is currently occupied by impervious asphalt paving and an office building that
would be demolished. The Project Site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or
threatened species. Existing trees on the Project Site would be removed in accordance with the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The Proposed Project includes the installation of 13,011
square feet of landscaping, including synthetic turf, trees, shrubs, and ground cover in the
landscape setbacks and outdoor terrace and garden patio.
4. Would approval of the project result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality?
a. Traffic:
Construction - There would be a temporary minor increase in traffic due to construction
vehicles during the construction phase. However, this impact would be temporary. Therefore,
potential impacts associated with construction traffic would be less than significant.
Operation – A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared to analyze the potential traffic impacts
associated with the Proposed Project (Traffic Impact Analysis, Sunrise Assisted Living Project,
Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers, October 19, 2018).
The three (3) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments selected for evaluation
were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and
application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The intersections and roadway
segments listed below are all located within the City of Orange and provide local access to the
study area and define the extent of the boundaries for the Traffic Impact Analysis.
Key Study Intersections
1. Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
2. Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
3. Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Key Roadway Segments
A. Lincoln Avenue, west of Oceanview Avenue
B. Lincoln Avenue, between Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street
C. Lincoln Avenue, east of Canal Street
D. Canal Street, south of Lincoln Avenue
Based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, Land Use
Code 254: Assisted Living, the Proposed Project, prior to taking credit for the existing land use is
forecast to generate 497 daily trips, 22 AM peak hour trips (15 inbound, 7 outbound) and 35
PM peak hour trips (18 inbound, 17 outbound). The existing office building currently generates
131 daily trips, 16 AM peak hour trips and 15 PM peak hour trips. With application of existing
trip credits, the Proposed Project is forecast to generate a net of 366 daily trips, a net of 6 AM
peak hour trips (1 inbound, 5 outbound) and a net of 20 PM peak hour trips (16 inbound, 4
outbound).
The Traffic Impact Analysis found that the Proposed Project would not significantly impact any
of the key study intersections or roadway segments in the Existing Plus Project or Year 2021
Cumulative Plus Project conditions and no improvements are recommended. The intersection
of Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue currently operates at an unacceptable LOS during the
PM peak hour, however, this intersection is not impacted per the significant impact criteria in
the Traffic Impact Analysis and the peak hour traffic signal warrant is not satisfied. Therefore,
potential impacts associated with traffic on surrounding roadway segments and intersections
would be less than significant.
b. Noise:
Construction - The Proposed Project would generate temporary noise during construction
activities. Equipment used during construction could create noise impacts through the duration
of the construction process. However, these impacts are temporary and would cease upon
completion of construction. Title 8, Chapter 8.24.050(E) of the City’s municipal code exempts
construction noise during the hours of 7:00am and 8:00pm on any day except Sunday or a
Federal Holiday, or between the hours of 9:00am and 8:00pm on Sunday or a Federal Holiday.
Construction activities would take place during the exempted hours. Therefore, construction
noise resulting from the Proposed Project is exempt from the City’s construction noise
ordinance and no impacts associated with construction noise would occur.
Operation - The Proposed Project is a senior assisted living facility that, when constructed,
would generate noise impacts consistent with those of surrounding land uses. Therefore,
potential impacts associated with noise from the operation of the Proposed Project would be
less than significant.
c. Air Quality:
The Project Site is located within SoCAB which is characterized by relatively poor air quality and
is a Federal- and State-designated nonattainment area for O3, PM10 and PM2.5 (US EPA 2012).
SCAQMD has established significance thresholds for both construction and operational
activities relative to these criteria pollutants. Based on the following analysis, implementation
of the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts relative to the daily
significance thresholds for criteria air pollutant construction emissions established by the
SCAQMD.
Construction - The Proposed Project consists of the demolition of an existing 13,414 square foot
office building and associated surface parking area and construction of a three-story senior
assisted living facility with 74,514 square feet of floor area and 93 assisted living units with a
total of 120 beds on a 1.55-acre parcel. General construction activities, such as site preparation,
grading, and travel by construction workers can contribute to air pollutants. All construction
activities would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 (SCAQMD 2005) regarding the control of
fugitive dust emissions, and existing City dust suppression practices that minimize dust and
other emissions. Such controls include frequent watering of the Project Site, the covering
and/or wetting of trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose materials off-site, street
sweeping, as needed, to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or mud that would
otherwise be carried off by trucks departing the Project Site, suspending grading and excavation
activities in high winds (25 miles per hour [mph] or more) as well as implementation of a traffic
control plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities, etc., that would
be incorporated into the construction plans.
Construction is conservatively anticipated to last 18 months and construction would be broken
into five phases: demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and
architectural coating. Pollutant emissions resulting from Proposed Project construction
activities were calculated using the CalEEMod model 2016.3.2. Construction emissions are
based on conservative assumptions, which imply a default equipment mix and a worst-case
construction schedule. As shown in Table 1 - Project-Related Construction and Operational
Emissions, the incremental increase in emissions from Proposed Project construction activities
fall well below SCAQMD significance thresholds for regional emissions. Therefore, potential air
quality impacts associated with construction would be less than significant.
Operation - The incremental increase in regional emissions resulting from operation of the
Proposed Project would not exceed any SCAQMD thresholds. Mobile source emission
calculations utilize the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rate calculated by CalEEMod, based on the
specific proposed land use and intensity. The daily VMT rate is based on the number of daily
trips for each land use and applied to a commute percentage and an average trip length, both
of which are land use specific values derived from CalEEMod. These values account for
variations in trip frequency and length associated with commuting to and from the Proposed
Project. Emission factors specific to the buildout year are projected based on SoCAB-specific
fleet turnover rates and the impact of future emission standards and fuel efficiency standards.
The increase in the consumption of fossil fuels to provide power, heat, and ventilation was
considered in the calculations as stationary point source emissions. Future fuel consumption
rates are estimated based on land use specific energy consumption rates. The emission factors
used in this analysis represent a State-wide average of known power producing facilities,
utilizing various technologies and emission control strategies, and do not consider any unique
emissions profile. These emission factors are considered conservative and representative. Area
source emissions were calculated by CalEEMod and include emissions from natural gas and
landscape fuel combustion, consumer products, and architectural coatings (future
maintenance). As shown in Table 1, the operational pollutant emission concentrations resulting
from the Proposed Project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, potential air
quality impacts associated with operation would be less than significant.
Table 1 Project-Related Construction and Operational Emissions
Mass Daily Thresholds (pounds per day)
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Construction Emissions
SCAQMD
Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
2019 2.44 40.88 15.60 0.08 7.00 3.74
2020 16.07 15.13 14.47 0.03 1.15 0.87
Maximum 16.07 40.88 15.60 0.08 7.00 3.74
Exceed
Threshold? No No No No No No
Operational Emissions
SCAQMD
Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Project
Emissions 3.19 7.37 19.88 0.07 5.73 1.58
Exceed
Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod 2016.3.2
Regional emissions refer to the ambient conditions surrounding the Project Site. Therefore,
pollutant emissions associated with construction of the Proposed Project would be less than
significant. Operational related impacts are typically associated with emissions produced from
Project-generated vehicle trips. Based on the Proposed Project’s anticipated compliance with
SCAQMD Rule 403 and the small scale of development, potential impacts associated with air
quality would be less than significant.
d. Water Quality:
The Proposed Project consists of the demolition of an existing 13,414 square foot office
building and associated surface parking area and construction of a three-story senior assisted
living facility with 74,514 square feet of floor area and 93 assisted living units with a total of
120 beds on a 1.55-acre parcel. Grading and construction associated with site work on the
project site would result in temporary disturbance of surface soils, which could potentially
result in erosion and sedimentation on site, which are major visible water quality impacts
attributable to construction activities. Any stockpiles of excavated areas would be susceptible
to high rates of erosion from wind and rain and, if not manage properly, could result in
increased sedimentation in local drainage ways.
The Property Owner/Developer shall implement storm water and urban runoff pollution
prevention controls, and Best Management Practices (BMPs) on construction sites in
accordance with Title 7, Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater Discharges, of the City
Code. The Project Site is more than one acre, therefore, the Property Owner/Developer would
be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) MS4 Permit and General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with
Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009- DWQ) and prepare a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would generally contain a site
map showing the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, storm water
collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage
patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways. Therefore, with compliance with Title 7,
Chapter 7.01 of the City’s Code, compliance with the MS4 and Construction General Permit,
and implementation of a SWPPP, potential impacts associated with water quality would be less
than significant.
5. Can the project site be adequately served by all required utilities and public services?
a. Fire Protection:
The construction of senior assisted living facility could incrementally increase demands for fire
protection services. However, the increased demand for fire protection services would be met
with existing fire resources. Potential impacts to fire services would be adequately funded by
an increase in tax revenue, over an extended period, relative to the increase in development
intensity, as well as through development impact fees in accordance with Orange Municipal
Code Chapter 15.38: Fire Protection Facilities Program. Additional fire personnel and associated
facilities and equipment would be provided through the annual Operating Budget and Capital
Improvement Program review process. Fire Department needs are assessed annually, and
budget allocations revised accordingly to ensure that adequate levels of service are maintained
throughout the City. Building plans submitted for new development on the Project Site would
be required to comply with fire safety requirements. Additionally, development of the Project
Site would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities.
Therefore, potential impacts associated with fire protection would be less than significant.
b. Police Protection:
The construction of senior assisted living facility could incrementally increase demands for
police services. However, the increased demand for police protection services would be
adequately funded by an increase in tax revenue, over an extended period of time, as well as
through development impact fees in accordance with Orange Municipal Code Chapter 3.13:
Police Facility Development Fee. Development of the Project Site would not result in the need
for new or physically altered police protection facilities. Therefore, potential impacts associated
with police protection would be less than significant.
c. Schools:
The Proposed Project would include the construction of senior assisted living facility. Up to 120
new residents would directly result from the Proposed Project, however, they would be senior
citizens and would not be of school age. Therefore, no impacts to schools would occur.
d. Parks:
The Proposed Project would include the construction of a senior assisted living facility. Up to
120 new residents would directly result from the Proposed Project, however, they would have
access to on-site recreational amenities, including an outdoor terrace and garden patio. The
Project Site is directly adjacent to the existing Eisenhower Park, and residents would have
pedestrian access to the park site. No new parks would be required to serve the senior
population at the Project Site. Therefore, no impacts to parks would occur.
e. Other Public Facilities:
The Proposed Project would include the construction of a senior assisted living facility. Up to
120 new residents would directly result from the Proposed Project, however, this is a nominal
increase in population. Therefore, no impacts to other public facilities, such as libraries, would
occur.
f. Wastewater/Sewer:
The Proposed Project would be served by the City of Orange Public Works Department for
wastewater (sanitary sewer) collection service. The Proposed Project is located within a
developed area and there is an existing sanitary sewer main in Lincoln Avenue, adjacent to the
Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would be required to connect to this existing sanitary
sewer line. Due to the small size of the Proposed Project, existing wastewater infrastructure
and facilities would be adequate to serve the wastewater collection requirements of the
Proposed Project. Therefore, potential impacts to wastewater treatment facilities/sewer
systems would be less than significant.
g. Storm Water Drainage:
The Proposed Project consists of the demolition of an existing 13,414 square foot office
building and associated surface parking area and construction of a three-story senior assisted
living facility with 74,514 square feet of floor area and 93 assisted living units with a total of
120 beds on a 1.55-acre parcel. Per Title 7, Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater
Discharges, of the City Code, the Applicant would be required to include specific design Best
Management Practices to ensure that no storm water runoff generated on the Project Site
would leave it without pre-treatment for urban pollutants. The Applicant has prepared a
Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (Sunrise Orange, Fuscoe Engineering,
Inc., October 17, 2018). Under proposed conditions, area drains will capture on-site low flows
and transport them to a Modular Wetland System (MWS) for treatment. High flows will be
pumped to the existing catch basin on Lincoln Avenue immediately to the southeast of the
Project site. High flows that bypass area drains will sheet flow onto Lincoln Avenue and
Oceanview Avenue. Run-on to the Project site will be diverted by a v-ditch that will connect to
the existing catch basin to the southeast of the Project Site. The Property Owner/Developer
would be required to comply with Title 7, Chapter 7.01.060 of the City’s code and implement all
recommendations contained within the WQMP.
The Proposed Project would not involve an alteration of the course of a stream or river. The
Project Site is more than one acre, therefore, the Property Owner/Developer would be
required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) MS4 Permit and General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with
Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009- DWQ) and prepare a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would generally contain a site
map showing the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, storm water
collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage
patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways. Therefore, with compliance with Title 7,
Chapter 7.01 of the City’s Code, potential impacts associated with storm water drainage would
be less than significant.
h. Water Supplies:
The City of Orange Water Division is responsible for providing a clean, safe, potable water
supply to the City of Orange. The City receives water from three main sources: groundwater
through 15 active wells managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD), surface water
from the Serrano Water District, and imported surface water from the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California (MWD) from the Colorado River and the State Water Project in
Northern California 1. The 2015 Urban Water Management Program concluded that the City
would have adequate supply to meet water demand during normal, single dry, and multiple dry
years over the next 25 years. The Proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan and
Zoning Code and was reflected in the City’s demand calculations. Therefore, potential impacts
1 https://www.cityoforange.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/171
associated with water supplies would be less than significant.
i. Solid Waste Disposal:
The Proposed Project would include the construction of a senior assisted living facility. The
Proposed Project’s contribution of solid waste would be minimal and would not significantly
impact solid waste collection or landfill operations. Therefore, potential impacts associated
with solid waste disposal would be less than significant.
j. Electricity: k. Natural Gas: l. Telephone Service: m. Television Service:
The Project Site is in a built-out, urban setting. The site and the surrounding properties are fully
served by various utility service providers. There are no anticipated significant service or
system upgrades needed to serve the proposed senior assisted living use. Therefore, potential
impacts associated with demand for these services would be less than significant.
** Authority: See Public Resources Code Section 21083 and Section 15332 of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations.
DETERMINATION:
I find that the analysis adequately supports each question and that the effects of the Proposed
Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – Infill
Development Projects) characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions of Section
15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The Proposed Project would not cause a
significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Signature of City of Orange Representative Date
Printed Name, Title Phone Number
Sunrise Assisted Living and Memory Care
Orange, CA
Site and Surrounding Photos
Project Site and Oceanview Ave. (Facing North)
Project Site and Intersection (Lincoln Ave. and Canal St.)
Project Site (Facing Northwest)
West of Project Site (Oceanview Ave.)
East of Project Site (Eisenhower Park and Commercial)
Slope from Property Site to Adjacent Parking Lot for Eisenhower Park
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/11/2019 10:32:30AM01.22.2019
TC
TC
TITLE SHEET
G1.10
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
CONTACTS SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP
PROPERTY OWNER:
JMJ Enterprises
1301 E Lincoln Ave
Orange, CA 92865
ARCHITECT:
HPI Architecture
115 22nd Street
Newport Beach, CA 92663
John Paris
jparis@hpiarchitecture.com
(949)675-6442
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
Ridge Landscape Architects
8841 Research Drive, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
Jim Ridge
jim@ridgela.com
(949) 387-1323
GENERAL:
G1.10 - TITLE SHEET
SUNRISE OF ORANGE - ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ORANGE, CA
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
APPLICANT:
1301 E Lincoln, LLC
2390 E. Orangewood Ave, Suite 510
Anaheim, CA 92806
Greg McCafferty
(714) 606-72008
CIVIL ENGINEER:
FUSCOE Engineering, Inc
16795 Von Karman, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92606
Mark Nero, PE
mnero@fuscoe.com
(949) 474-1960
ARCHITECTURAL:
A1.01 - OVERALL SITE PLAN
A2.00 - LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
A2.10 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A2.20 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A2.50 - ROOF PLAN
A4.01 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A4.02 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A5.01 - BUILDING SECTIONS
A5.10 - PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS
A5.11 - PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS
A5.12 - PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS
A5.13 - PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS
LANDSCAPE:
L1.1 - PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
L2.1 - PRELIMINARY COURTYARD
ENLARGMENT PLAN
L3.1 - LANDSCAPE SITE LIGHTING PLAN
L4.1 - PRELIMINARY PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
L4.2 - PRELIMINARY PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
L5.1 - PROJECT MATERIAL AND PLANTING
IMAGERY
L6.1 - COLOR CODED PLANTING PLAN
L7.1 - PRELIMINARY IRRIGATION PLAN
L8.1 - EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 CFC CHAPTER 5, SECTION 510.1, AND LOCAL
ORDINANCE 8-16, ALL NEW BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE APPROVED RADIO COVERAGE FOR
EMERGENCY RESPONDERS WITHIN THE BUILDING BASED UPON THE EXISTING
COVERAGE LEVELS OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS OF THE
JURISDICTION AT THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. THE EMERGENCY RESPONDER
RADIO COVERAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF
ORANGE EMERGENCY RESPONDER DIGITAL RADIO GUIDELINE UNDER SEPARATE
SUBMITTAL.
2. PARKING GARAGE TO ALSO BE EQUIPPED TO MEET THE NEEDS OF EMERGENCY
RESPONDER COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.
3. TREES PLANTED ALONG THE FIRE ACCESS ROADWAY AND/OR FIREFIGHTER
REQUIRED WALKWAY SHALL NOT IMPEDE THE REQUIRED MINIMUM 5’0” WALKWAY
WIDTH OR THE REQUIRED FIRE APPARATUS VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 13’-6”. THE
TREES SHOULD BE A TYPE THAT THE NATURAL GROWTH PATTERN WOULD ALLOW THE
REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE WITHOUT RELIANCE ON REGULAR MAINTENANCE OF
THE TREE CANOPIES.
4. ALL CURB CUTS FOR THE PROJECT, INCLUDING AT THE ALLEY AND ANY
EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS POINTS, TO BE ADA COMPLIANT.
5. CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED) CONCPETS
IMPLEMENTED THROUGHOUT PROJECT TO BE MAINTAINED.- FIRE SPRINKLERS
- UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE SERVICE
- FIRE SPRINKLER MONITORING/ALARM SYSTEM
- EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
GENERAL NOTES
DEFFERED SUBMITTAL
6. A FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION WILL BE PART OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM DESIGN. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO THE NEW
STRUCTURE AND MUST BE CONSIDERED RELATIVE TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE FIRE
SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
A. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL NOT BE AFFIXED TO THE
BUILDING;
B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST 40
FEET AWAY FROM THE BUILDING;
C. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE
ADDRESS SIDE OF THE BUILDING;
D. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE LOCATED W ITHIN 40 FEET
OF A HYDRANT ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET AND FIRE ACCESS
DRIVE AS THE HYDRANT;
E. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL NOT PROVIDE PRESSURE TO
AN ON-SITE HYDRANT.
F. THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
DN
52
60.5
60
61
62
63
65
59
64
62
54
54
60.5
73
6671
75
75
67.5
72.5
67.5
72.5
74.5
74
73
72
73
62
64.5
68
67
66
65
67
66
54
62
52
62.5
64
61
72.5 68.75 65.0 64.0
67.5 69 13' - 0"OCEAN VIEW AVE.LIN C O LN A V E.(N) PROPOSED 3-STORY
ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY
PROPERTY LINE
RETAINING WALL W/ 6'-0" H.
WROUGHT IRON FENCE
ATOP.
RETAINING WALL.
RETAINING WALL W/
6'-0" H. SOLID WOOD
FENCE ATOP.
PLANTER WALL
RAISED PLANTER @ LOWER
ELEV. (APPROX. +265.5')
SITE ACCESS STAIR
(E) SIDEWALK & CURB
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
P R O PER T Y L IN E
RETAINING WALL W/
WROUGHT IRON FENCE ATOP.
42" MAX. WALL HEIGHT ABOVE
ADJ. GRADE.
DROP-OFF
RAMP DOWN
CONC. PATHWAY
3' - 0"20' - 0"4' - 8"FIRE ACCESS LANE
RETAINING WALL.
100' BACK-UP
(E) SIDEWALK & CURB
TIERED PLANTING / RETAINING
WALL, SEE CIVIL & LANDSCAPE.
ENTRY
GARDEN PATIO
(APPROX +262')
TERRACE
(APPROX +251.5')
ENTRY COURT
(APPROX +262')
EMERGENCY GENERATOR
ENCLOSURE (11'-6" x 16'-0")
6' H FENCE W/ 4' W GATE
ACCESS W/ ALARMED EGRESS.
PROVIDE KNOX-BOX.
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
(N) FIRE HYDRANT
ENTRACNE SIGN AND 20'H
FLAG POLE
PROPOSED STANDPIPE
(SEE FMP)
TO 62 SUBTERRANEAN PARKING SPACES
11' - 7"2' - 0"2' - 3"24' - 0"TRELLIS ABOVE
P R O P E R T Y L I N E
WALK-WAY
10'X40' LOADING
& DELIVERY ZONE
(E) POWER POLE / STREET LIGHT
(E) POWER POLE / STREET LIGHT
(E) TRAFFIC LIGHT
(N) POWER POLE
TRANSFORMER
PROPERTY LINE
20' - 0" 12' - 0"
ROOF OVERHANG,
TYP.
1
A5.01
1
A5.01
2
A5.01
2
A5.01
4
A5.01
RETAINING WALL W/
WROUGHT IRON FENCE
ATOP. 42" MAX. WALL
HEIGHT ABOVE ADJ.
GRADE.
PROPOSED FDC, SEE CIVIL.
(N) DRIVEWAY APRON
RETAINING WALL.
RAISED PLANTER
ACCESSIBLE PATH
OF TRAVEL
16.5%
3
A5.01
5' - 0"
1' - 6"4' - 0"10' - 0"4'-0"H MONUMENT SIGN
4' W GATE ACCESS W/ ALARMED
EGRESS. PROVIDE KNOX-BOX.
4' W.I. ACCESS GATE
WITH KNOX BOX
PARKING ACCESS W/ CARD
READER CALL-BOX AND
TRAFFIC ARM R 20' - 0"R 50' - 0"DISPOSAL VEHICLE ACCESS
& TURN-AROUND
MAX. 42" HIGH WALL FOR
SITE LINE CLEARANCE 33' - 8"5' - 0"BIKE RACKS
(N) 42"H SWING GATE W/ KNOX LOCK
ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE
INDICATED BY DASHED LINE, TYP.
15' - 0"20' - 0" 9' - 0"
INTERSECTION SIGHT
DISTANCE INDICATED
BY HATCH LINE. 15' - 0"TRASH
ENCLOSURE
12' - 7 1/2"2' - 0"9' - 0" 10' - 0"
5' HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCE W/ 4'-0"
WIDE ACCESS GATE W/ KNOX LOCK.
CONTINUE W/ 18" HIGH FENCE ATOP
RAMP WALL.2' - 0"15' - 0" 15' - 0"
15' - 1"10' - 0"2
A1.01
29' - 11 1/2"ALLEYADJACENT EISNEHOWER
PARK VEHICLE PARKING LOT
REFER TO ALTA SURVEY
30' - 0"
(E) OVERHEAD AND
UNDERGROUND EASEMENT.(O LD SA N TIA G O BLV D .)4'-0"H MONUMENT SIGN
6'-0" H. SOLID
WOOD FENCE.
10' - 0" 6' - 1"10' - 0"10' - 0"R 14' - 6"FIRST FLOOR
0' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
12' - 0"
ROOF
23' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
-11' - 0"
T.O.P
27' - 8"
L I N E O F S I G H T
MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT, TYP.
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:35:49 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
OVERALL SITE PLAN
A1.01
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
SCALE
1" = 20'-0"1SITE PLAN
PROJECT DATA
PROPOSED PROJECT:
3 STORIES, 93 UNITS OF ASSISTED LIVING AND ALZHEIMER'S/DEMENTIA CARE
SITE AREA: 1.554 ACRES (67,707 S.F.)
APN:360-363-05
LOT & TRACT INFO:PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 IN BLOCK Q, AND PORTIONS
OF LOTS 5 & 6 IN BLOCK R OF THE OLIVE HEIGHTS
TRACT. (RECORDED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 18 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY)
LOT COVERAGE:43.7% (29,584 SF / 67,707 SF x 100)
BUILDING AREA: LOWER LEVEL PLAN: 16,552 S.F.
FIRST LEVEL PLAN: 29,584 S.F.
SECOND LEVEL PLAN: 28,378 S.F.
TOTAL: 74,514 S.F.
DENSITY (FAR):1.10 (74,514 GSF / 67,707 SF)
LOWER LEVEL PARKING AREA: 29,400 S.F
(NOT INCL'D IN DENSITY OF FLOOR AREA TOTALS)
BUILDING HEIGHT:TOP OF ROOF: 34' - 6" AFG
TOP OF MANSARD: 40' - 6" AFG
OCCUPANCY: R2.1 (NON-SEPARATED USE, ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY)
ZONING:GC - GENERAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE
OP - OFFICE PROFESSIONAL
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: I-B
TYPE OF CONSTURCTION: NON-COMBUSTABLE, STEEL / MASONRY
SPRINKLERS:FULLY SPRINKLERED (NFPA 13)
UNIT MIX TOTALS
ASSISTED LIVING
AL STUDIO 25
AL SEMI-PRIVATE 7
AL 1-BDRM 4
AL 2-BDRM 16
AL TOTAL 52
TOTAL UNIT COUNT 93
TOTAL BED COUNT 120
MEMORY CARE
MC STUDIO 20
MC SEMI-PRIVATE 7
MC 2-BDRM 14
MC TOTAL 41
STANDARD STALLS (18' X9') 59
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS 02
VAN ACCESSIBLE STALLS 01
TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED 62
PARKING TABULATION
1/16" = 1'-0"2 LINE OF SIGHT
UP
UP
UP
52
54
54
54
52
DRIVE AISLE25' - 0"DRIVE AISLE
25' - 0"
RAMP UP
62 SPACES
407' - 7 1/2" OVERALL
215' - 0 1/2"D RIV E A ISLE25' - 0"M E M O R Y C A R E
301 SF
OFFICE
353 SF
MC
STUDIO
Not Enclosed
PARKING
392 SF
BOILER
RM.
CORR.DRIVE AISLE25' - 0"25' - 0"53' - 10".
283' - 9"
174' - 9"232' - 10 1/2"106' - 0"1
18' - 8"
157' - 1 1/2"
FIR
E
FIR
E1' - 0"104' - 0"1' - 0"FINISH FLOOR
EL. 251.5'
TERRACE
(APPROX +251.5')
333 SF
MC
STUDIO
205 SF
GEN.
542 SF
MC
2-BDRM
556 SF
MC
2-BDRM
557 SF
MC
2-BDRM
353 SF
MC
STUDIO
MECH.
353 SF
MC
STUDIO
556 SF
MC
2-BDRM
353 SF
MC
STUDIO
556 SF
MC
2-BDRM
353 SF
MC
STUDIO
353 SF
MC
STUDIO
571 SF
MC
2-BDRM
566 SF
MC
2-BDRM
STAIR #3
322 SF
MAINT.
ELEC.
162 SF
STORAGE
338 SF
MC
STUDIO
332 SF
MC
STUDIO
419 SF
MC
STUDIO
478 SF
MC
SEMI-
PRIVATE
291 SF
MECH.
RM.
356 SF
ELEC.
RM.
1240 SF
DINING
CORR.
VEST.
542 SF
LIVING
ROOM
CORR.
444 SF
ACTIVITY
STAIR #2
359 SF
STORAGE
566 SF
MECH.
ROOM
STAIR #1
LAUNDRY
SPA
TOILET
ELEV. RM.
SERVERY
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
P R O PER T Y LIN E
P R O P E R T Y L I N E
PROPERTY LINE
2
A1.01
ELEV.
4' W GATE ACCESS W/ ALARMED
EGRESS. PROVIDE KNOX-BOX.
6' H FENCE W/ 4' W GATE
ACCESS W/ ALARMED EGRESS.
PROVIDE KNOX-BOX.
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:08 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
LOWER LEVEL PLAN
OVERALL
A2.00
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
0'16'32'48'8'
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR DATA
MEMORY CARE UNIT MIX
STANDARD STALLS (18' X9') 59
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS 02
VAN ACCESSIBLE STALLS 01
TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED 62
10
MC SEMI-PRIVATE 1
MC 2-BDRM 7
TOTAL 18
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR (GSF): 16,552 SF
SCALE
1/16" = 1'-0"1LOWER LEVEL
LOWER LEVEL PARKING (GSF): 29,400 SF
KEYNOTES
11
RETAINING WALL, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR FINISH TREATMENT.
PROPERTY LINE
STANDARD 9'X18' PARKING STALL, TYPICAL
ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION
ACCESSIBLE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING STALL
BICYCLE STORAGE
3500# SERVICE ELEVATOR, SEE TYPICAL ELEVATOR DETAIL SHEET A2.10.
STRUCTURAL COLUMN, TYP.
EMERGENCY GENERATOR (11'-6" x 16'-0" )
PROPOSED LOCATION OF TRANSFORMER. FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY UTILITY
COMPANY.
FIRE STAND PIPE WITH RECESSED HOSE RACK CABINET.
DOORS TO BE PROVIDE WITH DELAYED EGRESS, TIED TO CENTRAL INFORMATION SYSTEM.
ROLL-DOWN SECUTRY GRILLE @ BOTTOM OF DRIVE RAMP. PROVIDE KNOX BOX W/ SUBMASTER
KEY FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
DESIGNATED MOTORCYCLE PARKING, 300 SF MIN. AREA.
INTERIOR WALLS, COLUMNS, CEILING OF PARKING GARAGE TO BE PAINTED WHITE.
PROVIDE FIRE DEPT. APPROVED KNOX BOX.
1
10
3
2
2
1
2 1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
9
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
6
4
7
7
8
1
9
10
11
3
3
3
3
3
12
12
PARKING TABULATION
4
MC STUDIO
5
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
15
15
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA (506)
Aa = [At + (NS X I )] X Sa [EQUATION 5-2]
* WE ARE USING THE EQUATION FOR THE SINGLE OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY
BUILDING (506.2.3) AND USING THE PRIMARY OCCUPANCY OF R2.1
WHERE:
Aa = ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
At = TABULAR ALLOWABLE AREA FACTOR (NS, S13R, OR SM VALUE AS APPLICABLE) IN
ACCORANCE WITH TABLE 506.2.
NS = TABULAR AREA FACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 506.2 FOR A NON-
SPRINKLER BUILDING (REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE BUILDING IS SPRINKLERED).
If = AREA FACTOR DUE TO FRONTAGE (PERCENT) AS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 506.3.
Sa = FOR GROUP A,E, H, I, L AND R OCCUPANCIES, ACTUAL NUMBER OF STORIES
ABOVE GRADE PLANE, NOT TO EXCEED 2.
NO INDIVIDUAL STORY TO EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE AREA (Aa) AS DETERMINED BY
EQUATION 5-2 USING VALUE OF Sa = 1.
TYPE I-B
At = 165,000 (PER R2.1 - SM WITHOUT HEIGHT INCREASE ON TABLE 506.2)
NS= 55,000 (PER R2.1 - TABLE 506.2)
WHEN NO FRONTAGE INCREASE IS TAKEN:
I = 0 (TBB)
Sa = 2
TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA PER FLOOR (WHEN Sa = 1)
Aa = [ 165,000 + (55,000 X 0) ] X 1 = 165,000 SF
TOTAL ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
Aa = [ 165,000 + (55,000 X 0) ] X 2 = 333,000 SF
TYPE I-A
At = UNLIMITED FOR ALL APPICABLE OCCUPANCY GROUPS
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA PER FLOOR: 165,00 SF
16
5
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
8
17
17
UP
UP
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP
52
60.5
60
61
62
63
65
59
64
62
54
54
73
6671
75
75
67.5
72.5
67.5
72.5
74.5
74
73
72
73
62
64.5
68
67
66
65
67
66
54
62
52
62.5
64
61
72.5 68.75 65.0 64.0
67.5 69
ENTRY
DROP-OFF
RAMP DOWN75' - 0"392' - 8 1/2"
63' - 0"
1670 SF
DINING
93 SF
OFFICE
148 SF
OFFICE
157 SF
OFFICE
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
584 SF
LOBBY
CORR.
624 SF
LIVING
ROOM
E.M.
E.
FINISH FLOOR
EL. 262''26' - 8 1/2" 6' - 1" 31' - 2 1/2"
M.
W.
FIRE
FIRE
FIR
E
FIR
E
GARDEN PATIO
(APPROX +262')
TERRACE
(APPROX +251.5')
570 SF
AL
1-BDRM
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
556 SF
AL
2-BDRM
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
556 SF
AL
2-BDRM
542 SF
AL
1-BDRM
334 SF
AL
STUDIO
459 SF
AL
SEMI-
PRIVATE
461 SF
AL
SEMI-
PRIVATE
563 SF
AL
2-BDRM
556 SF
AL
2-BDRM
564 SF
AL
2-BDRM
345 SF
AL
STUDIO
343 SF
AL
STUDIO
STAIR #2
STAIR #3
110 SF
OFFICE
183 SF
OFFICE
165 SF
OFFICE
761 SF
TV
166 SF
OFFICE
132 SF
OFFICE
627 SF
ACTIVITY
627 SF
BISTRO
543 SF
LIBRARY540 SF
AL
2-BDRM
348 SF
AL
STUDIO
379 SF
AL
STUDIO
555 SF
AL
2-BDRM
554 SF
AL
2-BDRM
461 SF
AL
SEMI-
PRIVATE
461 SF
AL
SEMI-
PRIVATE
461 SF
AL
SEMI-
PRIVATE353 SF
AL
STUDIO
571 SF
AL
2-BDRM
540 SF
AL
2-BDRM
628 SF
AL
2-BDRM
578 SF
AL
2-BDRM
368 SF
AL
STUDIO 302 SF
LAUNDRY
273 SF
SALON
164 SF
STAFF
LOUNGE
1124 SF
KITCHEN
371 SF
PRIVATE
DINING
TRASH
TOILETSPA
STAIR #1
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
P R O PER T Y LIN E
P R O P E R T Y L I N E
PROPERTY LINE
176' - 2"216' - 6"
2
A1.01
ELEV.
ELEV.
4' W GATE ACCESS W/ ALARMED
EGRESS. PROVIDE KNOX-BOX.
4' W GATE ACCESS.
MIN. CLR.
7' - 8"(4'-6" MIN. CLR.)5' - 5"MIN. CLR.
4' - 0"2' - 0"7' - 0"
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:19 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
FIRST FLOOR PLAN -
OVERALL
A2.10
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
SCALE
1/16" = 1'-0"1FIRST FLOOR PLAN
0'16'32'48'8'
FIRST FLOOR DATA
ASSISTED LIVING UNIT MIX
AL STUDIO 13
AL SEMI-PRIVATE 5
AL 2-BDRM 12
AL 1-BDRM
62TOTAL
32
FIRST FLOOR (GSF): 29,584 SF
KEYNOTES
RETAINING WALL, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR FINISH TREATMENT.
PROPERTY LINE
FIRE STAND PIPE WITH RECESSED HOSE RACK CABINET.
COVERED ENTRY
PILASTER
PLANTER, SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS.
RAILING
WALK-WAY, SEE LANDSAPE DWGS.
GUARDRAIL
PASSENGER DROP-OFF AREA.
ACCESS TO PUBLIC SIDEWALKS
PROVIDE FIRE DEPT. APPROVED KNOX BOX.
PAVED DRIVEWAY APPROACH, SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS.
MONUMENT SIGN, 4'-0" H, EXTERNAL ILLUMINATION, REFER TO COLOR BOARD FOR FINISHES.
TYPICAL SITE FURNITURE, SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS.
3500# SERVICE ELEVATOR, SEE TYPICAL ELEVATOR DETAIL SHEET A2.10.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
3
4
6
6 8
8
8
X
7
8
69
9
15
1
9
10
11
11
11
12
12
6
6
13
13
14
14
15
15
10
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA (506)
Aa = [At + (NS X I )] X Sa [EQUATION 5-2]
* WE ARE USING THE EQUATION FOR THE SINGLE OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY
BUILDING (506.2.3) AND USING THE PRIMARY OCCUPANCY OF R2.1
WHERE:
Aa = ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
At = TABULAR ALLOWABLE AREA FACTOR (NS, S13R, OR SM VALUE AS APPLICABLE) IN
ACCORANCE WITH TABLE 506.2.
NS = TABULAR AREA FACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 506.2 FOR A NON-
SPRINKLER BUILDING (REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE BUILDING IS SPRINKLERED).
If = AREA FACTOR DUE TO FRONTAGE (PERCENT) AS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 506.3.
Sa = FOR GROUP A,E, H, I, L AND R OCCUPANCIES, ACTUAL NUMBER OF STORIES
ABOVE GRADE PLANE, NOT TO EXCEED 2.
NO INDIVIDUAL STORY TO EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE AREA (Aa) AS DETERMINED BY
EQUATION 5-2 USING VALUE OF Sa = 1.
TYPE I-B
At = 165,000 (PER R2.1 - SM WITHOUT HEIGHT INCREASE ON TABLE 506.2)
NS= 55,000 (PER R2.1 - TABLE 506.2)
WHEN NO FRONTAGE INCREASE IS TAKEN:
I = 0 (TBB)
Sa = 2
TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA PER FLOOR (WHEN Sa = 1)
Aa = [ 165,000 + (55,000 X 0) ] X 1 = 165,000 SF
TOTAL ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
Aa = [ 165,000 + (55,000 X 0) ] X 2 = 333,000 SF
TYPE I-A
At = UNLIMITED FOR ALL APPICABLE OCCUPANCY GROUPS
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA PER FLOOR: 165,00 SF
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
TYP. ELEVATOR DETAIL
16
16
DN
DN
DN
UP
DN69' - 0"123' - 8"
63' - 0"
(OPEN)
SERVERY
TC WING
ELEC.
MEMORY CARE
137 SF
OFF.
335 SF
MC
STUDIO
334 SF
MC
STUDIO
333 SF
AL
STUDIO
328 SF
AL
STUDIO
268 SF
STAFF
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
CORR.
438 SF
LOUNGE
392' - 8 1/2"6' - 1"54' - 0"
186' - 8"
176' - 2"216' - 6"
FIRE
FIR
E
FIR
E
FINISH FLOOR
EL. 273.5'
504 SF
PT
1094 SF
DINING
594 SF
LIVING
RM
744 SF
DECK
203 SF
DECK
106 SF
EXAM
339 SF
WELLNESS
SPA
TOILET
LAUND.
563 SF
AL
2-BDRM
462 SF
AL
SEMI-
PRIVATE
459 SF
AL
SEMI-
PRIVATE
317 SF
AL
STUDIO
542 SF
AL
1-BDRM
556 SF
AL
2-BDRM
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
556 SF
AL
2-BDRM
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
556 SF
AL
2-BDRM
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
353 SF
AL
STUDIO
469 SF
AL
1-BDRM
368 SF
AL
STUDIO
STAIR #3
345 SF
AL
STUDIO
343 SF
AL
STUDIO
ELEV.
177 SF
OFF.
TOILET
SPA
ELEV.
550 SF
MC
2-BDRM
829 SF
MC
2-BDRM
111 SF
LAUND.
371 SF
MC
STUDIO
371 SF
MC
STUDIO
371 SF
MC
STUDIO
355 SF
MC
STUDIO
354 SF
MC
STUDIO
368 SF
MC
STUDIO
578 SF
MC
2-BDRM
STAIR #1
356 SF
MC
STUDIO
541 SF
MC
2-BDRM
575 SF
MC
2-BDRM
368 SF
MC
STUDIO
477 SF
MC
SEMI-
PRIVATE
461 SF
MC
SEMI-
PRIVATE
461 SF
MC
SEMI-
PRIVATE 576 SF
MC
2-BDRM
550 SF
MC
2-BDRM
350 SF
MC
STUDIO
351 SF
MC
STUDIO
387 SF
MC
STUDIO
308 SF
ACTIVITY
STAIR #2
206' - 0"2
A1.01
FIRE
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:25 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
SECOND FLOOR PLAN -
OVERALL
A2.20
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
SCALE
1/16" = 1'-0"1SECOND FLOOR PLAN
0'16'32'48'8'
MEMORY CARE UNIT MIX
MC STUDIO 10
MC SEMI-PRIVATE 6
MC 2-BDRM 7
TOTAL 23
SECOND FLOOR (GSF): 28,378 SF
SECOND FLOOR DATA
ASSISTED LIVING UNIT MIX
AL STUDIO 12
AL SEMI-PRIVATE 2
AL 1-BDRM 2
AL 2-BDRM 4
TOTAL 20
KEYNOTES
RETAINING WALL
PROPERTY LINE
TRELLIS BELOW
DECK
LOW ROOF BELOW
FIRE STANDPIPE WITH RECESSED HOSE RACK CABINET
PILASTER & GUARDRAIL
DOORS TO BE PROVIDE WITH DELAYED EGRESS, TIED TO CENTRAL INFORMATION SYSTEM.
3500# SERVICE ELEVATOR, SEE TYPICAL ELEVATOR DETAIL SHEET A2.10.
1
2
3
4
5
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
6
6
4
4
6
7
7
4
8
8
8
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA (506)
Aa = [At + (NS X I )] X Sa [EQUATION 5-2]
* WE ARE USING THE EQUATION FOR THE SINGLE OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY
BUILDING (506.2.3) AND USING THE PRIMARY OCCUPANCY OF R2.1
WHERE:
Aa = ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
At = TABULAR ALLOWABLE AREA FACTOR (NS, S13R, OR SM VALUE AS APPLICABLE) IN
ACCORANCE WITH TABLE 506.2.
NS = TABULAR AREA FACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 506.2 FOR A NON-
SPRINKLER BUILDING (REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE BUILDING IS SPRINKLERED).
If = AREA FACTOR DUE TO FRONTAGE (PERCENT) AS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 506.3.
Sa = FOR GROUP A,E, H, I, L AND R OCCUPANCIES, ACTUAL NUMBER OF STORIES
ABOVE GRADE PLANE, NOT TO EXCEED 2.
NO INDIVIDUAL STORY TO EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE AREA (Aa) AS DETERMINED BY
EQUATION 5-2 USING VALUE OF Sa = 1.
TYPE I-B
At = 165,000 (PER R2.1 - SM WITHOUT HEIGHT INCREASE ON TABLE 506.2)
NS= 55,000 (PER R2.1 - TABLE 506.2)
WHEN NO FRONTAGE INCREASE IS TAKEN:
I = 0 (TBB)
Sa = 2
TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA PER FLOOR (WHEN Sa = 1)
Aa = [ 165,000 + (55,000 X 0) ] X 1 = 165,000 SF
TOTAL ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
Aa = [ 165,000 + (55,000 X 0) ] X 2 = 333,000 SF
TYPE I-A
At = UNLIMITED FOR ALL APPICABLE OCCUPANCY GROUPS
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA PER FLOOR: 165,00 SF
9
9
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
3
1:12
1:121 :1 2
3:12
1:12
3:12
1:12
3:12
1:12
3:12
1:12
3:12
1:12
3:12
DECK TRELLIS BELOW
1/4" / 1'-0"3/8" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"3:123:123:123:123:12
3:123:12
3 :1 2
3:12
3 :1 2
3 :1 2
3:12
2
A1.01
3 :1 2
3:12
3 :1 22:122:123:123:122:123:123 :1 2
3:12
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:28 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
ROOF PLAN
A2.50
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
0'16'32'48'8'
SCALE
1/16" = 1'-0"1ROOF PLAN
KEYNOTES
MANSARD SLOPED ROOF, TYPICAL.
FLAT ROOF.
TRELLIS & DECK BELOW.
ROOF DRAIN & OVERFLOW, TYPICAL.
ROOF ACCESS.
ELEVATOR OVERRIDE.
ROOF MOUNTED MECHANICAL UNITS, TYPICAL.
STANDPIPE WITH HOSE VALVE.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
1
1
4
1
2
2
5
6
67
7
8
8
5
8
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:49:58 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
BUILDING SECTIONS
A5.01
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
ADJACENT RESIDENCE
1
2
3
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:30 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A4.01
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
NOT USED .
NOT USED .
NOT USED .
VERTICAL BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING
7
4
5
6
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:31 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A4.02
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
NOT USED .
NOT USED .
NOT USED .
VERTICAL BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING
2
1
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:34 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
PERSPECTIVE
RENDERINGS
A5.10
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
2 ENTRY COURT
1 SITE ACCESS - OCEAN VIEW AVE.
2
1
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/11/2019 10:20:12AM01.22.2019
TC
TC
PERSPECTIVE
RENDERINGS
A5.11
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
1 NORWEST VIEW - LINCOLN AVE.
2 LOWER COURTYARD
2
1
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:37 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
PERSPECTIVE
RENDERINGS
A5.12
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
1 SOUTHEAST VIEW - OCEAN VIEW AVE.
2 AERIAL VIEW - OCEAN VIEW AVE.
2
1
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2019
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND
COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY
OTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWN BY
SEALS / APPROVALS
CONSULTANTS
PROJECT TITLE
SUBMITTALS
7902 WESTPARK DRIVE
McLEAN, VA 22102
#DATE DESCRIPTION
PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19C:\Users\tconcialdi\Documents\Sunrise_Orange_R17_Central_tconcialdi_.rvt3/8/2019 3:36:38 PM01.22.2019
TC
TC
PERSPECTIVE
RENDERINGS
A5.13
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SUNRISE - ORANGE
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING
1301 E. LINCOLN AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92865
1 AERIAL VIEW - EISENHOWER PARK
2
AERIAL VIEW - EISENHOWER PARK,
PARKING LOT
DNUPO C E A N V I E W A V E N U EL
I
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
N
SEW5260.56061626365596462545460.5736671757567.572.567.572.574.5747372736264.5PROPOSED SENIOR LIVINGBUILDING68676665676654625262.5646172.568.7565.064.067.569DNUPO C E A N V I E W A V E N U EL
I
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
N
SEW5260.56061626365596462545460.5736671757567.572.567.572.574.5747372736264.5PROPOSED SENIOR LIVINGBUILDING68676665676654625262.5646172.568.7565.064.067.569EXISTING TREESSYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECOMMENTSLAGERSTROEMIAINDICACRAPE MYRTLESTREET TREEEXISTING TREESVARIESOFF SITE PARKPARK TREESPROPOSED PLANT LEGENDSYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE /SPACINGQTY.WUCOLSREGION 4TREESARBUTUS X 'MARINA'MARINASTRAWBERRY TREE36" BOXMULTI2MODLOPHOSTEMONCONFERTUSBRISBANE BOX36" BOXSTD.8MODOLEA EUROPAEA'SWAN HILL'FRUITLESS OLIVE36" BOXMULTI12LOWPINUS CANARIENSISCANARY ISLAND PINE24" BOX15LOWQUERCUS AGRIFOLIACOAST LIVE OAK48" BOXSTD.6LOWC HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLANL1.1123LEGENDARRIVAL PLAZA - CONCRETE TOPPINGSLAB - INTEGRAL COLOREDCONCRETE W/ SAWCUT JOINTS ANDTOPCAST FINISHENTRY FOCAL TREE OFFSET FROMPARKING GARAGE BELOWBARBEQUEBOLLARDS AT FLUSH CURBCONDITION AT BUILDING ENTRYMODULAR WETLANDS TO BECOORDINATED WITH CIVIL ENGINEERMONUMENT SIGNAGEPERIMETER SLOPE PLANTING W/DROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUBS ANDVERTICAL EVERGREEN TREES BISTRO OUTDOOR SEATINGVEGGIE BOXES AND ESPALIERSHADE TRELLIS W/ SEATING BELOWGROUP SEATING AREAFIRE ACCESS DRIVECONVERSATION AREA FURNISHINGSSHADED BY UMBRELLASBENCH SEATINGBUTTERFLY GARDENPLANT CONTAINERDECORATIVE PAVING ELEMENTTERRACED - SLOPING PLANTERSNEW FLAG POLEEXISTING OPEN SPACE WITH TREESGENERATOR ENCLOSURE456791113141581012161718122456991010141217181920202020206611212119781315163
5260.5616263656462545460.564.5PROPOSED SENIOR LIVINGBUILDING68676665676654625262.5646164.05260.5616263656462545460.564.5PROPOSED SENIOR LIVINGBUILDING68676665676654625262.5646164.0C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19PRELIMINARYCOURTYARDENLARGEMENT PLANL2.1123LEGENDSHADE TRELLIS WITH COMMUNITYTABLE AND CHAIRS BELOWGROUP SEATING AREASPECIMEN SHADE TREETABLE, CHAIRS AND UMBRELLASEATINGCLUB CHAIR WITH SIDE TABLEVEGGIE GARDEN BOXES WITHWALKER AND WHEELCHAIR ACCESSSTAIRS TO LOWER COURTYARD.GATED AT TOP AND BOTTOMTERRACED AND SLOPED PLANTERSSHADE TRELLIS CANTILEVERED OFFOF TERRACED RETAINING WALL WITHCONVERSATION SEATING GROUPINGBELOWBUTTERFLY GARDEN WITH WATERQUALITY STORAGE BELOWBENCH SEATINGMODULAR WETLANDS WITHORNAMENTAL GRASSESSOLID 6' HIGH SCREEN FENCE ATPROPERTY LINE3' X 6' TOOL SHEDPROPANE BBQPLANT CONTAINER WITH ACCENTPLANT MATERIALOUTDOOR DINING WITH BISTROTABLES & CHAIRS & UMBRELLAS4567111314810121235633571098611311131314151615161291717448
DNUPO C E A N V I E W A V E N U EL
I
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
N
SEWPROPOSED SENIOR LIVINGBUILDINGDNUPO C E A N V I E W A V E N U EL
I
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
N
SEWPROPOSED SENIOR LIVINGBUILDINGL1L1L7L8L3L5L5L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L1L5L5L3L3L3L1L1L4L2L1L7L1L1L4L2L1LANDSCAPE LIGHTING SCHEDULEKEYSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONMANUFACTURERMODEL NO.COLOR / FINISHCOMMENTSCOMMON AREA LIGHTINGTREE UPLIGHTBK LIGHTINGNITE STARSBLACK SATINPATHWAY LIGHTKIM LIGHTINGPAVILLION BOLLARDGREYFIXTURE CATALOG CUTON SHEET E5PARKING LOTLIGHTUSARCHITECTURALLIGHTINGRAZAR SERIESGREY20' POLE - FIXTURECATALOG CUT ONSHEET E5LOW WALL LIGHTLIGMAN LIGHTINGURA-40552GREYFIXTURE CATALOG CUTON SHEET E5TRELLIS DOWNLIGHTBK LIGHTINGCATSKILL SERIESBLACKSIGN LIGHTINGKIM LIGHTINGEL218 MICRO-FLOODBLACKFLAG POLELIGHTTARGETTILIGHTINGKEPLERO MINI 6" ZOOMANODIZED ANDPOWDERCOATEDBLACKDIE-CASTALUMINUMNOTE: SITE LIGHTING SHOWN HERE FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. SYMBOLS SHOWN AT DIAGRAMMATIC SIZE FOR VISUAL CLARITY.L1L2L3L4L5L6L7C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19TREE UP LIGHTINGBOLLARD LIGHTINGPARKING LOT LIGHTINGWALL LIGHTTRELLIS DOWN LIGHTSIGN LIGHTINGFLAG POLE LIGHTLANDSCAPE SITELIGHTING PLANL3.1
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19PRELIMINARYPERSPECTIVE VIEWSL4.1MEMORY CARE COURTYARDARRIVAL COURTYARD
C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19PRELIMINARYPERSPECTIVE VIEWSL4.1ASSISTED LIVING COURTYARDASSISTED LIVING COURTYARDL4.2
RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'CLARA' /CLARA INDIAN HAWTHORNALOE STRIATA /CORAL ALOEASCLEPIAS SYRIACA/MILKWEEDAGAVE 'BLUE FLAME' /BLUE FLAME AGAVEALOE 'BLUE ELF' /BLUE ELF ALOEBUDDLEIA DAVIDII /BUTTERFLY BUSHASPARAGUS DENSIFLORUS/ASPARAGUS FERNCAREX DIVULSA/BERKELEY SEDGEDIANELLA 'LITTLE REV'/LITTLE REV FLAX LILYJUNCUS PATENS /GREY RUSHMUHLENBERGIA EMERSLEYI 'EL TORO' /BULL GRASSLANTANA 'NEW GOLD' /NEW GOLD LANTANADIANELLA 'VARIEGATA' /VARIEGATED FLAX LILYMYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM 'PINK' /PINK GROUNDCOVER MYOPORUMPITTOSPORUM CRASSIFOLIUM 'NANA'/DWARF KAROPODOCARPUS GRACILIOR 'ICEE BLUE' /ICEE BLUE YELLOW-WOODSHRUBS, VINE AND GROUND COVERSSESLERIA GREENLEE /GREENLEE MOOR GRASSFICUS PUMILA /CREEPING FIGHARDENBERGIA VIOLACEA/PURPLE LILAC VINEC HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19TREESPROJECT MATERIALAND PLANTINGIMAGERYL5.1PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVING COLOR AND FINISHCONCRETE PAVINGCOLOR: NATURAL GREY,FINISH: TOPCAST 05,JOINTS: SAWCUTCONCRETE PAVINGCOLOR: NATURAL GREY,FINISH: MEDIUM BROOM,JOINTS: TOOLEDPROPOSED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING COLOR AND FINISHPROPOSED WALL COLOR AND FINISHPROPOSED SITE RAILING AND FALL PROTECTIONSTAINLESS STEEL TUBE WITH STAINLESSSTEEL CABLERAILSCONCRETE PAVINGCOLOR: DAVIS COLORS - ADOBECONCRETE PAVINGCOLOR: DAVIS COLORS - GRAPHITE 8084DECOMPOSED GRANITE MULCHPALM SPRINGS GOLD FINES BY SOUTHWESTBOULDER & STONESTUCCO WALL COLOR(COLOR TO BE DETERMINED)STUCCO WALL FINISH (SMOOTH)WALL CAP FINISH TO BE LIGHTACID WASH FINISHPROPOSED PLANT CONTAINERNATURAL CONCRETE COLOR WITHCRAFTSMANS ETCHARBUTUS MARINA /MARINA STRAWBERRYTREELOPHOSTEMONCONFERTUS /BRISBANE BOXOLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' /SWAN HILL FRUITLESS OLIVEPINUS CANARIENSIS /CANARY ISLAND PINEQUERCUS AGRIFOLIA /COAST LIVE OAKSPLIT FACE WALL - TAN COLORCOLORED CONCRETE CAP
DNUP(E)(E)(E)(E)PROPOSED PLANT LEGENDSYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE /SPACINGQTY.WUCOLSREGION 4TREESARBUTUS X 'MARINA'MARINASTRAWBERRY TREE36" BOXMULTI2MODLOPHOSTEMONCONFERTUSBRISBANE BOX36" BOXSTD.8MODOLEA EUROPAEA'SWAN HILL'FRUITLESS OLIVE36" BOXMULTI12LOWPINUS CANARIENSISCANARY ISLAND PINE24" BOX15LOWQUERCUS AGRIFOLIACOAST LIVE OAK48" BOXSTD.6LOWSHRUBSAGAVE 'BLUE FLAME'BLUE FLAME AGAVE15 GAL. /30" O.C.37LOWALOE 'BLUE ELF'BLUE ELF ALOE1 GAL. /24" O.C.381LOWALOE STRIATACORAL ALOE15 GAL. /30" O.C.59LOWASCLEPIAS SYRIACAMILKWEED1 GAL. /30" O.C.62LOWASPARAGUSDENSIFLORUSASPARAGUS FERN1 GAL.24" O.C.141MODBUDDLEIA DAVIDIIBUTTERFLY BUSH5 GAL. /36" O.C.30MODCAREX DIVULSABERKELEY SEDGE1 GAL. /24" O.C.314LOWDIANELLA 'LITTLE REV'LITTLE REV FLAX LILY1 GAL. /24" O.C.283LOWDIANELLA T.'VARIEGATA'VARIEGATA FLAX LILY5 GAL. /30" O.C.176MODJUNCUS PATENSCALIFORNIA GRAYRUSH1 GAL. /18" O.C.60LOWLANTANA 'NEW GOLD'NEW GOLD LANTANA5 GAL. /36" O.C.91LOWMUHLENBERGIA E. 'ELTORO'BULL GRASS1 GAL. /30" O.C.111LOWMYOPORUMPARVIFOLIUM 'PINK'PINK MYOPORUM1 GAL. /36" O.C.278LOWPITTOSPORUMCRASSIFOLIUM 'NANA'DWARF TOBIRA5 GAL. /36" O.C.116MODPODOCARPUS X 'ICEEBLUE'ICEE BLUEPODOCARPUS15 GAL.48" O.C.29MODRHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA'CLARA'INDIAN HAWTHORN5 GAL. /36" O.C.276MODSESLARIA AUTUMNALIS'GREENLEE'GREENLEE AUTUMNMOOR GRASS1 GAL. /24" O.C.306MODVEGETABLES -TO BE SELECTED BY OWNERMODVINESFICUS PUMILACREEPING FIG5 GAL. /STAKED28MODHARDENBERGIAVIOLACEAPURPLE LILAC VINE5 GAL. /STAKED9MODEXISTING TREESSYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECOMMENTSLAGERSTROEMIAINDICACRAPE MYRTLESTREET TREEC HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19COLOR CODEDPLANTING PLANL6.1LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONSNOTES:NOTIFY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (714) 532-6464, FOR LANDSCAPEINSPECTION PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OF PLANTING FOR PLANT MATERIAL, CITYSTREET TREES, AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. 48 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED.PROJECT TYPE : NEW LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIONTREE TOTALSON SITE TREES SIZEARBUTUS X 'MARINA'236" BOXLOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS 836" BOXOLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL'1236" BOXPINUS CANARIENSIS1524" BOXQUERCUS AGRIFOLIA6 48" BOX PROJECT AREA TOTALS TOTAL SITE AREA (INSIDE PROPERTY LINE): 71,176 S.F.BUILDING FOOTPRINT 29,097 S.F. HARDSCAPE AREA 16,513 S.F.LANDSCAPE AREA 14,700 S.F. PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA (INSIDE PROPERTY LINE) 21%PERCENTAGE OF HARDSCAPE AREA (NET SITE AREA; BLDG. NOT INCLUDED) 38%
SUB-SURFACEINLINE DRIP TUBINGOVER HEADSPRAY / ROTORSIRRIGATION ZONESDNUPSTATEMENT OF WATER CONSERVATIONPLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN UTILIZED ONTHIS PROJECT DIRECTED SPECIFICALLY AS CONSERVING WATER ANDIMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM:·IRRIGATION DESIGN UTILIZING DRIP IRRIGATION WITH 90%EFFICIENCY AND UP TO 40% REDUCTION IN WATER USAGE.·ALL SPRINKLERS SPACED HEAD TO HEAD 100% OFMANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED RADIUS.·ALL SPRAY HEADS UTILIZE MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATENOZZLES AND CHECK VALVES.·ALL SPRAY HEADS UTILIZE PRESSURE REGULATION, CHECK VALVES,AND PRESSURE COMPENSATING SCREENS.·RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN FOR ANNUAL IRRIGATION SCHEDULE.·IRRIGATION ZONES SEPARATED BY PLANT MATERIAL TYPES.·IRRIGATION ZONES SEPARATED BY EXPOSURE AND ORIENTATION.·UTILIZATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER VALVE.·UTILIZATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM FLOW SENSOR.·UTILIZATION OF RAIN SHUT-OFF DEVICE CONNECTED TO IRRIGATIONCONTROLLER.·UTILIZATION OF (ET) BASED "SMART" IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WITHWATER BUDGETING FEATURE.·MULCH 3/4" - 1" SIZE UTILIZED IN THE LANDSCAPE; 3" DEPTH MIN.·SOIL AMENDMENTS UTILIZED TO IMPROVE WATER HOLDINGCAPACITY OF SOIL.·AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM ADJUSTED SEASONALLY AND WITHWATERING HOURS BETWEEN 10:00 P.M. AND 6:00 A.M.C HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19L7.1PRELIMINARYIRRIGATION PLANNOTES:NOTIFY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (714)532-6464, FOR IRRIGATION MAIN LINE PRESSURE TESTAND COVERAGE TEST. 48 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED.
(E)(E)(R)OCEANVIEW AVENUELI
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
N
U
E 1245367891011121314151617221819202151504948474645445352424336373534333231302928272625242338394041(E)(E)EXISTING TREE SURVEYNO.BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEHEIGHTSPREADCALIPERDISPOSITION1EUCALYPTUSSIDEROXYLONRED IRONBARK30'20'18"TO BE REMOVED2EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM25'15'18"TO BE REMOVED3EUCALYPTUS RUDISFLOODED GUM30'20'18"TO BE REMOVED4EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM35'20'12"TO BE REMOVED5EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM35'20'8"TO BE REMOVED6EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM35'20'18"TO BE REMOVED7EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM35'20'18"TO BE REMOVED8EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM35'20'18"TO BE REMOVED9EUCALYPTUSPOLYANTHEMOSSILVER DOLLAR GUM25'25'48"TO BE REMOVED10WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTAMEXICAN FAN PALM14' BTH8'14"TO BE REMOVED11EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM40'15'30"TO BE REMOVED12EUCALYPTUSPOLYANTHEMOSSILVER DOLLAR GUM35'15'18"TO BE REMOVED13EUCALYPTUSPOLYANTHEMOSSILVER DOLLAR GUM35'15'36"TO BE REMOVED14LAGERSTROEMIA INDICACREPE MYRTLE15'10'6"TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE15LAGERSTROEMIA INDICACREPE MYRTLE15'10'6"TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE16EUCALYPTUSPOLYANTHEMOSSILVER DOLLAR GUM15'10'10"TO BE REMOVED17LAGERSTROEMIA INDICACREPE MYRTLE15'10'6"TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE18UNIDENTIFIED--20'20'18"TO BE REMOVED19UNIDENTIFIED--20'20'14"TO BE REMOVED20EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM35'25'14"TO BE REMOVED21EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM35'25'18"TO BE REMOVED22EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM30'20'14"TO BE REMOVED23LAGERSTROEMIA INDICACREPE MYRTLE15'10'6"TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE24LAGERSTROEMIA INDICACREPE MYRTLE15'10'6"TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE25FICUS NITIDAINDIAN LAUREL FIG25'25'18"TO BE REMOVED26CUPANIOPSISANACARDIODESCARROTWOOD15'15'20"TO BE REMOVED27EUCALYPTUSPOLYANTHEMOSSILVER DOLLAR GUM20'15'18"TO BE REMOVED28CUPANIOPSISANACARDIODESCARROTWOOD25'20'24"TO BE REMOVED29CUPANIOPSISANACARDIODESCARROTWOOD25'20'14"TO BE REMOVED30EUCALYPTUS RUDISFLOODED GUM30'25'36"TO BE REMOVED31EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM30'20'18"TO BE REMOVED32EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM30'20'14"TO BE REMOVED33EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM30'20'30"TO BE REMOVED34WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTAMEXICAN FAN PALM25' BTH8'18"TO BE REMOVED35PINUS HALEPENSISALEPPO PINE20'20'12"TO BE REMOVED36WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTAMEXICAN FAN PALM15' BTH8'14"TO BE REMOVED37MORUS SPP.MULBERRY TREE35'35'36"TO BE REMOVED38EUCALYPTUSPOLYANTHEMOSSILVER DOLLAR GUM30'20'24"TO BE REMOVED39EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM25'15'24"TO BE REMOVED40EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM25'15'12"TO BE REMOVED41EUCALYPTUSCITRIODORALEMON SCENTED GUM25'15'14"TO BE REMOVED42SYAGRUSROMANZOFFIANAQUEEN PALM25' BTH10'12"TO BE REMOVED43SYAGRUSROMANZOFFIANAQUEEN PALM18' BTH10'14"TO BE REMOVED44FICUS BENJAMINAWEEPING FIG25'25'18"TO BE REMOVED45ACER SPP.MAPLE TREE20'15'12"TO BE REMOVED46ACER SPP.MAPLE TREE20'15'12"TO BE REMOVED47ACER SPP.MAPLE TREE20'15'8"TO BE REMOVED48PHOENIX ROEBELENIIPYGMY DATE PALM10' BTH5'6"TO BE REMOVED49SCHEFFLERA PUECKLERIMALLET FLOWER20'15'14"TO BE REMOVED50SYAGRUSROMANZOFFIANAQUEEN PALM15' BTH10'14"TO BE REMOVED51SYAGRUSROMANZOFFIANAQUEEN PALM14' BTH15'12"TO BE REMOVED52SYAGRUSROMANZOFFIANAQUEEN PALM14' BTH8'10"TO BE REMOVED53EUCALYPTUSSIDEROXYLONRED IRONBARK30'25'24"TO BE REMOVEDC HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 2018SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLETHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANDCOPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANYOTHER PROJECT OR LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.PROJECT IDENTIFICATIONCHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BYSEALS / APPROVALSCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLE03/08/2019RLARLA18084SUBMITTALS7902 WESTPARK DRIVEMcLEAN, VA 22102#DATEDESCRIPTIONPLANNING SUBMITTAL01.29.1905/31/1903/08/19SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL03.08.19EXISTING TREEDISPOSITION PLANL8.1
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 2
2.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Site Access ............................................................................................................................. 3
3.0 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................. 4
3.1 Existing Street System ........................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 4
3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions ............................................................................................ 5
3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) .......... 5
3.3.2 Highway Capacity Manual Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) .............. 5
3.3.2.1 Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections .................................................................... 5
3.3.2.2 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections ....................................................................... 6
3.4 Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio Method of Analysis (Roadway Segments) ........................ 6
3.5 Level of Service Criteria ........................................................................................................ 6
3.6 Existing Level of Service Results .......................................................................................... 7
3.6.1 Intersections .................................................................................................................... 7
3.6.2 Roadway Segments ......................................................................................................... 7
4.0 Traffic Forecasting Methodology ......................................................................................... 13
5.0 Project Traffic Characteristics ............................................................................................. 14
5.1 Project Traffic Generation .................................................................................................... 14
5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment ....................................................................... 14
5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions .............................................................................. 15
6.0 Future Traffic Conditions ..................................................................................................... 17
6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth ....................................................................................................... 17
6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics ........................................................................ 17
6.3 Year 2021 Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................. 17
7.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology ................................................................................. 20
7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................................................ 20
7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios ....................................................................................... 21
8.0 Existing Plus Project Analysis .............................................................................................. 22
8.1 Intersections ......................................................................................................................... 22
8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ...................................................................... 22
8.2 Roadway Segments .............................................................................................................. 22
8.2.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ...................................................................... 23
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
SECTION PAGE
9.0 Year 2021 Plus Project Analysis ........................................................................................... 26
9.1 Intersections ......................................................................................................................... 26
9.1.1 Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic Conditions ................................................................... 26
9.1.2 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ............................................... 26
9.2 Roadway Segments .............................................................................................................. 27
9.2.1 Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic Conditions ................................................................... 27
9.2.2 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ............................................... 27
10.0 Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation ................................................................ 30
10.1 Site Access Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 30
10.2 Internal Circulation Evaluation ........................................................................................ 30
11.0 Recommended Improvements .............................................................................................. 32
11.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions .......................................................................... 32
11.2 Year 2021 Plus Project Traffic Conditions....................................................................... 32
12.0 Parking Analysis .................................................................................................................... 33
12.1 Parking Requirements Per 4th Edition of Parking Generation .......................................... 33
12.2 Parking Requirements Based on Parking Surveys for Comparable Sites ........................ 33
12.2.1 Description of Survey Sites .......................................................................................... 33
12.2.2 Parking Requirements – Proposed Project .................................................................... 34
12.3 Parking Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 34
13.0 Summary Of Findings And Conclusions ............................................................................. 36
APPENDICES
APPENDIX
A. Traffic Study Scope of Work
B. Existing Traffic Count Data
C. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets
D. Project Driveways Level of Service Calculation Worksheets
E. Parking Survey Data for Similar Sites
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
SECTION—FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE
1–1 Vicinity Map ....................................................................................................................... 2
2–1 Existing Site Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 3
2–2 Proposed Site Plan .............................................................................................................. 3
3–1 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls ........................................... 4
3–2 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................................................... 4
3–3 Existing PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ...................................................... 4
5–1 Project Traffic Distribution Pattern ............................................................................... 16
5–2 AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes ....................................................................... 16
5–3 PM Peak Hour and Daily Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................... 16
5–4 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................... 16
5–5 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes .............................. 16
6–1 Location of Cumulative Projects ..................................................................................... 19
6–2 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes ................................................ 19
6–3 PM Peak Hour and Daily Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes ............................... 19
6–4 Year 2021 Cumulative AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................ 19
6–5 Year 2021 Cumulative PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ........................... 19
6–6 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................... 19
6–7 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ..... 19
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
iv
LIST OF TABLES
SECTION—TABLE # PAGE
3–1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections ....................................................... 8
3–2 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM 6 Methodology) ........... 9
3–3 Roadway Link Capacities ................................................................................................ 10
3–4 Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service ............................................................................. 11
3–5 Existing Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ................................................ 12
5–1 Project Traffic Generation Forecast ................................................................................ 16
6–1 Location and Description of Cumulative Projects .......................................................... 18
6–2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Generation Forecast ........................................................... 19
8–1 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis .................................. 24
8–2 Existing Plus Project Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ........................... 25
9–1 Year 2021 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................................... 28
9–2 Year 2021 Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ............................................ 29
11–1 Project Driveway Peak Hour Levels of Service Summary ............................................ 31
12–1 Parking Requirements for the Proposed Project ............................................................. 35
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
1
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT
Orange, California October 19, 2018
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This traffic impact analysis addresses the potential traffic impacts and circulation needs associated
with the proposed Sunrise Assisted Living Project (hereinafter referred to as Project). The Project
proposes to demolish the existing occupied 13,414 square foot (SF) office building and to construct a
93-unit (120 total beds) assisted living and memory care facility, of which 52 units are assisted
living and 41 units are memory care. The Project site is located at 1301 East Lincoln Avenue in the
City of Orange, California.
This report documents the findings and recommendations of a traffic impact analysis conducted by
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to determine the potential impacts associated with the
Project. The traffic analysis evaluates the existing operating conditions at three (3) key study
intersections and four (4) key roadway segments within the project vicinity, estimates the trip
generation potential of the Project, and forecasts future operating conditions without and with the
proposed Project. Where necessary, intersection improvements/mitigation measures are identified.
This traffic report satisfies the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15,
2007, and is consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the most current
Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Orange County. The Scope of Work for this traffic
study, which is included in Appendix A, was developed in conjunction with City of Orange Traffic
Engineering staff.
The project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area roadways and intersections was
performed. Existing traffic information has been collected at three (3) key study intersections and
four (4) key roadway segments on a “typical” weekday for use in the preparation of intersection and
roadway segment level of service calculations. Information concerning cumulative projects (planned
and/or approved) in the vicinity of the proposed Project has been researched at the City of Orange
and City of Anaheim. Based on our research, there are three (3) cumulative projects in the City of
Orange and six (6) cumulative projects in the City of Anaheim within the vicinity of the subject site.
These nine (9) planned and/or approved cumulative projects were considered in the cumulative
traffic analysis for this project.
This traffic report analyzes existing and future weekday daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour
traffic conditions for a near-term (Year 2021) traffic setting upon completion of the proposed
Project. Daily and peak hour traffic forecasts for the Year 2021 horizon year have been projected by
increasing existing traffic volumes by an annual growth rate of one percent (1.0%) per year and
adding traffic volumes generated by nine (9) cumulative projects.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
2
1.1 Study Area
The three (3) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments selected for evaluation
were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and
application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The intersections and roadway segments
listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this
traffic impact investigation. It should be noted that each key study intersection and roadway
segment is located within the City of Orange.
Key Study Intersections
1. Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
2. Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
3. Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Key Roadway Segments
A. Lincoln Avenue, west of Oceanview Avenue
B. Lincoln Avenue, between Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street
C. Lincoln Avenue, east of Canal Street
D. Canal Street, south of Lincoln Avenue
Figure 1-1 presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the proposed Project
and depicts the study locations and surrounding street system. The Level of Service (LOS)
investigations at these key locations were used to evaluate the potential traffic-related impacts
associated with area growth, cumulative projects and the proposed Project. When necessary, this
report recommends intersection and/or roadway segment improvements that may be required to
accommodate future traffic volumes and restore/maintain an acceptable Level of Service and/or
mitigate the impact of the project.
Included in this Traffic Impact Analysis are:
Existing traffic counts,
Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assignment,
Estimated cumulative project traffic generation/distribution/assignment,
Daily, AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing conditions,
Daily, AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing plus project conditions,
Daily, AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for future (Year 2021) conditions without and
with project traffic,
Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation,
Recommended Improvements, and
Parking Analysis.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
3
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project site is located at 1301 East Lincoln Avenue in the City of Orange, California.
The site is currently occupied with a 13,414 SF office building. Figure 2-1 presents an aerial
depiction of the existing site, which shows the existing office building to be demolished.
Figure 2-2 presents the proposed site plan for the proposed Project, prepared by HPI Architecture.
The proposed Project will consist of a 93-unit (120 total beds) assisted living and memory care
facility, of which 52 units are assisted living and 41 units are memory care. A total of 62 parking
spaces will be provided. The proposed Project is expected to be constructed and fully occupied by
the Year 2021.
2.1 Site Access
As shown in Figure 2-2, access to the proposed Project will be provided via one full access
unsignalized driveway located along Oceanview Avenue. It should be noted that a secondary
emergency access-only driveway will be provided along Lincoln Avenue.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
4
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Existing Street System
The principal local network of streets serving the proposed Project includes Lincoln Avenue,
Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street. The following discussion provides a brief synopsis of these
key area streets. The descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions.
Lincoln Avenue is generally a four-lane, divided roadway oriented in the east-west direction and
borders the Project site to the south. On-street parking is generally not permitted along this roadway
within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Lincoln Avenue is 45 miles per hour
(mph). A traffic signal controls the study intersection of Lincoln Avenue at Canal Street. The study
intersection of Lincoln Avenue at Oceanview Avenue is stop-controlled.
Oceanview Avenue is generally a two-lane, undivided roadway oriented in the north-south
direction. Oceanview Avenue borders the project site to the west and will provide access to the site
via one full access unsignalized driveway. On-street parking is generally permitted along this
roadway within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Oceanview Avenue is 25 mph.
The study intersection of Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue is stop-controlled.
Canal Street is generally a two-lane, undivided roadway, oriented in the north-south direction. On-
street parking is generally permitted along both sides of this roadway, within the vicinity of the
project. The posted speed limit on Canal Street is 25 mph. The study intersection of Canal Street at
Heim Avenue is stop-controlled.
Figure 3-1 presents an inventory of the existing roadway conditions for the arterials and
intersections evaluated in this report. This figure identifies the number of travel lanes for key
arterials, as well as intersection configurations and controls for the key area study intersections.
3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Three (3) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments have been identified as the
locations at which to evaluate existing and future traffic operating conditions. Some portion of
potential project-related traffic will pass through each of these intersections/roadway segments, and
their analysis will reveal the expected relative impacts of the project. These key intersections and
roadway segments were selected for evaluation based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic
Engineering staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the
City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007.
Existing daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the three (3) key study
intersections and four (4) key roadway segments evaluated in this report were conducted by
Transportation Studies Inc. in May 2018 and September 2018. Figures 3-2 and 3-3 illustrate the
existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the three (3) key study intersections. Figure 3-3
also presents the existing average daily traffic volumes for the four (4) key roadway segments in the
vicinity of the proposed Project.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
5
Appendix B contains the detailed peak hour count sheets for the key intersections evaluated in this
report. Appendix B also contains the average daily traffic volumes for the key roadway segments.
3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions
Existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the three (3) key study intersections were
evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections
and the methodology outlined in Chapter 20 of the HCM 6 for two-way stop-controlled
intersections, and the methodology outlined in Chapter 21 of the HCM 6 for all-way stop-controlled
intersections.
3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections)
In conformance with City of Orange requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating
conditions for the key signalized study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity
Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU technique is intended for signalized intersection analysis and
estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C
ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal
(green) time and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the
ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal
signal timing.
Per City of Orange requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour
(vph) for through and all turn lanes. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.05 was added to each Level
of Service calculation.
The ICU value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the
intersection performance. The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an
intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning
movements. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the
corresponding ICU value range and are shown in Table 3-1.
3.3.2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections)
The HCM unsignalized methodology for stop-controlled intersections was utilized for the analysis of
the unsignalized intersections. LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections differ from LOS criteria
for signalized intersections as signalized intersections are designed for heavier traffic and therefore a
greater delay. Unsignalized intersections are also associated with more uncertainty for users, as
delays are less predictable, which can reduce users’ delay tolerance.
3.3.2.1 Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections
Two-way stop-controlled intersections are comprised of a major street, which is uncontrolled, and a
minor street, which is controlled by stop signs. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled
intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay. The control delay by
movement, by approach, and for the intersection as a whole is estimated by the computed capacity
for each movement. LOS is determined for each minor-street movement (or shared movement) as
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
6
well as major-street left turns. The worst side street approach delay is reported. LOS is not defined
for the intersection as a whole or for major-street approaches, as it is assumed that major-street
through vehicles experience zero delay. The HCM control delay value range for two-way stop-
controlled intersections is shown in Table 3-2.
3.3.2.2 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections
All-way stop-controlled intersections require every vehicle to stop at the intersection before
proceeding. Because each driver must stop, the decision to proceed into the intersection is a function
of traffic conditions on the other approaches. The time between subsequent vehicle departures
depends on the degree of conflict that results between the vehicles and vehicles on the other
approaches. This methodology determines the control delay for each lane on the approach, computes
a weighted average for the whole approach, and computes a weighted average for the intersection as
a whole. Level of service (LOS) at the approach and intersection levels is based solely on control
delay. The HCM control delay value range for all-way stop-controlled intersections is shown in
Table 3-2.
3.4 Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio Method of Analysis (Roadway Segments)
Existing daily operating conditions for the four (4) key roadway segments have been investigated
according to the daily volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio of each link. The daily V/C relationship is
used to estimate the LOS of the roadway segment with the volume based on the 24-hour traffic count
data and the capacity based on the City of Orange General Plan Circulation and Mobility Element
street classifications. The roadway link capacity of each street classification according to the City of
Orange General Plan Circulation and Mobility Element is presented in Table 3-3, along with the six
corresponding service levels and associated V/C ratios.
3.5 Level of Service Criteria
According to the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum acceptable
condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak commute hours on all
intersections and LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained on a daily
basis on all roadway segments.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
7
3.6 Existing Level of Service Results
3.6.1 Intersections
Table 3-4 summarizes the existing peak hour service level calculations for the three (3) key study
intersections based on existing traffic volumes and current street geometry. Review of Table 3-4
indicates that one (1) key study intersection currently operates at an unacceptable LOS during the
PM peak hour. The remaining two (2) key study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels
of service (LOS D or better). The location operating at an adverse LOS is as follows:
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Key Intersection ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS
1. Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue -- -- 39.9 s/v E
Appendix C presents the ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the three (3) key study intersections
for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour.
3.6.2 Roadway Segments
Table 3-5 summarizes the existing service level calculations for the four (4) key roadway segments
based on existing 24-hour traffic volumes and current roadway geometry. The first column (1)
shows the number of lanes, the second column (2) shows the arterial classification and the third
column (3) shows the existing LOS “E” capacity. The fourth column (4) shows the daily volume,
V/C ratio and resulting level of service. Review of Table 3-5 indicates that all four (4) key roadway
segments currently operate at an acceptable level of service on a daily basis.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
8
TABLE 3-1
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1
Level of Service
(LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Utilization Value (V/C) Level of Service Description
A ≤ 0.60
EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer
than one red light, and no approach phase is
fully used.
B 0.61 – 0.70
VERY GOOD. An occasional approach
phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin
to feel somewhat restricted within groups
of vehicles.
C 0.71 – 0.80
GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to
wait through more than one red light;
backups may develop behind turning
vehicles.
D 0.81 – 0.90
FAIR. Delays may be substantial during
portions of the rush hours, but enough
lower volume periods occur to permit
clearing of developing lines, preventing
excessive backups.
E 0.91 – 1.00
POOR. Represents the most vehicles
intersection approaches can accommodate;
may be long lines of waiting vehicles
through several signal cycles.
F > 1.00
FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations
or on cross streets may restrict or prevent
movement of vehicles out of the
intersection approaches. Potentially very
long delays with continuously increasing
queue lengths.
1 Source: Transportation Research Board Circular 212 – Interim Materials on Highway Capacity.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
9
TABLE 3-2
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6 METHODOLOGY)2,3
Level of Service
(LOS)
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)
Delay Per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle)
Level of Service Description
A ≤ 10.0 Little or no delay
B > 10.0 and ≤ 15.0 Short traffic delays
C > 15.0 and ≤ 25.0 Average traffic delays
D > 25.0 and ≤ 35.0 Long traffic delays
E > 35.0 and ≤ 50.0 Very long traffic delays
F > 50.0 Severe congestion
2 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 20: Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. The LOS criteria apply to each lane on a given
approach and to each approach on the minor street. LOS is not calculated for major-street approaches or for the intersection as a whole.
3 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 21: All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. For approaches and intersection-wide assessment,
LOS is defined solely by control delay.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
10
TABLE 3-3
ROADWAY LINK CAPACITIES
Facility Type
Number
of Lanes
Level of Service Criteria With Associated Roadway Capacity
Daily Values (VPD)
Level of Service (LOS)
A B C D E 4 F
Principal 8-lanes
divided 45,000 52,500 60,000 67,500 75,000 --
Major 6-lanes
divided 33,900 39,400 45,000 50,600 56,300 --
Primary 4-lanes
divided 22,500 26,300 30,000 33,800 37,500 --
Secondary 4-lanes
undivided 14,400 16,800 19,200 21,600 24,000 --
Collector 2-lanes
undivided 7,200 8,400 9,600 10,800 12,000 --
V/C Ratio ≤ 0.60 0.61-0.70 0.71-0.80 0.81-0.90 0.91-1.00 ≥ 1.00
Notes:
VPD = vehicles per day
VPH = vehicles per hour
4 Source: City of Orange General Plan; Circulation and Mobility.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
11
TABLE 3-4
EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
Key Intersection
Time
Period
Jurisdiction
Minimum
Acceptable
LOS
Control
Type ICU/HCM LOS
1. Oceanview Avenue at AM Orange D One-Way 21.8 s/v C
Lincoln Avenue PM Stop 39.9 s/v E
2. Canal Street at AM Orange D 3 Phase 0.369 A
Lincoln Avenue PM Signal 0.563 A
3. Canal Street at AM Orange D All-Way 10.2 s/v B
Heim Avenue PM Stop 11.8 s/v B
Notes:
s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay)
BOLD ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values indicate unacceptable service level
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
12
TABLE 3-5
EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY
Key Roadway Segment Jurisdiction
Min.
Acc.
LOS
(1)
No. of
Existing
Lanes
(2)
Arterial
Classification
(3)
Existing
Capacity
at LOS “E”
(4)
Existing
Traffic Conditions
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
A. Lincoln Avenue
west of Oceanview Avenue Orange D 4D Primary 37,500 25,941 0.692 B
B. Lincoln Avenue between
Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street Orange D 4D Primary 37,500 28,342 0.756 C
C. Lincoln Avenue
east of Canal Street Orange D 4D Primary 37,500 25,566 0.682 B
D. Canal Street
south of Lincoln Avenue Orange D 2U Collector 12,000 6,072 0.506 A
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
13
4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY
In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the proposed Project, a multi-step process
has been utilized. The first step is trip generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing
traffic on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is forecast by applying the
appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the project development tabulation.
The second step of the forecasting process is trip distribution, which identifies the origins and
destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically
based on demographics and existing/anticipated travel patterns in the study area.
The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area
streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which
may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel
speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic
assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning
movements throughout the study area.
With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the
proposed Project is isolated by comparing operational (LOS) conditions at selected key intersections
using expected future traffic volumes with and without forecast project traffic. The need for site-
specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated and the
significance of the project’s impacts identified.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
14
5.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
5.1 Project Traffic Generation
Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either
entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic
forecasting procedure are found in the 10th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2017].
Table 5-1 summarizes the trip generation rates used in forecasting the vehicular trips generated by
the proposed Project and the existing land use (i.e. existing office building) and also presents the
project’s forecast peak hour and daily traffic volumes. For this analysis, the trip generation potential
of the existing land use was estimated using ITE Land Use 710: General Office Building trip rates
and the trip generation potential of the proposed Project was estimated using ITE Land Use 254:
Assisted Living trip rates.
Review of the middle portion of Table 5-1 shows that the Project, prior to taking credit for the existing
land use is forecast to generate 497 daily trips, 22 AM peak hour trips (15 inbound, 7 outbound) and
35 PM peak hour trips (18 inbound, 17 outbound). Further review of the middle portion of Table 5-1
shows that the existing office building currently generates 131 daily trips, 16 AM peak hour trips
and 15 PM peak hour trips. Review of the last row of Table 5-1 shows that with application of
existing trip credits, the proposed Project is forecast to generate a net of 366 daily trips, a net of 6
AM peak hour trips (1 inbound, 5 outbound) and a net of 20 PM peak hour trips (16 inbound, 4
outbound). The potential traffic impacts of the aforementioned net Project trips are evaluated in the
traffic impact analysis section of this report.
5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment
Figure 5-1 illustrates the general, directional traffic distribution pattern for the proposed Project.
Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the project site have been distributed and assigned
to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations:
directional flows on the freeways in the immediate vicinity of the project site (i.e. SR-55
Freeway, CA-91 Freeway, etc.),
the site's proximity to major traffic carriers (i.e. Lincoln Avenue),
expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence
of traffic signals, and
ingress/egress availability at the project site.
The anticipated AM and PM peak hour project traffic volumes associated with the Project are
presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3, respectively. Figure 5-3 also presents the daily project traffic
volumes for the Project. The traffic volume assignments presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3 reflect the
traffic distribution characteristics shown in Figure 5-1 and the traffic generation forecast presented
in Table 5-1.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
15
5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions
The existing plus project traffic conditions have been generated based upon existing conditions and
the estimated project traffic. These forecast traffic conditions have been prepared pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, which require that the potential impacts
of a Project be evaluated upon the circulation system as it currently exists. This traffic volume
scenario and the related intersection capacity analyses will identify the roadway improvements
necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impacts of the Project, if any.
Figures 5-4 and 5-5 present projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the three (3) key
study intersections and Project driveway with the addition of the trips generated by the proposed
Project to existing traffic volumes, respectively. Figure 5-5 also presents the existing plus project
daily traffic volumes.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
16
TABLE 5-1
PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST 5
ITE Land Use Code /
Project Description
Daily
2-Way
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total
Generation Rates:
ITE 254: Assisted Living (TE/Occupied Beds) 4.14 68% 32% 0.18 50% 50% 0.29
ITE 710: General Office Building (TE/TSF) 9.74 86% 14% 1.16 16% 84% 1.15
Generation Forecasts:
[A]. Proposed Project
Sunrise Assisted Living Project (120 Beds) 497 15 7 22 18 17 35
[B]. Existing Land Use
Existing Office Building (13,414 SF) 131 14 2 16 2 13 15
Total “Net Increase” Project Trip Generation:
Proposed Project Minus Existing Land Use [A] – [B] 366 1 5 6 16 4 20
Notes:
TE/Occupied Beds = Trip End per Occupied Beds
5 Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017).
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
17
6.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth
Horizon year, background traffic growth estimates have been calculated using an ambient traffic
growth factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future
cumulative projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to
the development of projects outside the study area. The future growth in traffic volumes has been
calculated at one percent (1.0%) per year. Applied to the Year 2018 existing traffic volumes, this
factor results in a 3.0% growth in existing volumes to the near-term horizon Year 2021.
6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics
In order to make a realistic estimate of future on-street conditions prior to implementation of the
proposed Project, the status of other known development projects (cumulative projects) in the
vicinity of the proposed Project has been researched at the City of Orange and City of Anaheim.
With this information, the potential impact of the proposed Project can be evaluated within the
context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development.
Based on our research, there are three (3) cumulative projects in the City of Orange and six (6)
cumulative projects in the City of Anaheim within the vicinity of the subject site that have either been
built, but not yet fully occupied, or are being processed for approval. These nine (9) cumulative
projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting.
Table 6-1 provides a brief description for each of the nine (9) cumulative projects. Figure 6-1
graphically illustrates the location of the cumulative projects. These cumulative projects are
expected to generate vehicular traffic, which may affect the operating conditions of the key study
intersections and/or roadway segments.
Table 6-2 presents the trip generation for the nine (9) cumulative projects. As shown in Table 6-2,
the nine (9) cumulative projects are forecast to generate a combined total of 5,795 daily trips, with
374 trips (123 inbound and 251 outbound) forecast during the AM peak hour and 551 trips (330
inbound and 221 outbound) forecast during the PM peak hour.
6.3 Year 2021 Traffic Volumes
The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes associated with the nine (9) cumulative projects are
presented in Figures 6-2 and 6-3, respectively. Figure 6-3 also presents the daily cumulative project
traffic volumes.
Figures 6-4 and 6-5 present the AM and PM peak hour cumulative traffic volumes (existing traffic +
ambient growth traffic + cumulative project traffic) at the three (3) key study intersections for the
Year 2021, respectively. Figure 6-5 also presents the Year 2021 daily cumulative traffic volumes.
Figures 6-6 and 6-7 illustrate the Year 2021 forecast AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, with
the inclusion of the trips generated by the proposed Project, respectively. Figure 6-7 also presents
the Year 2021 daily cumulative plus project traffic volumes.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
18
TABLE 6-1
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS 6
Cumulative Project Location Description
City of Orange
1. Simply Self Storage 1600 North Glassell Street 156.654 TSF Self-storage facility
2. MS International 485 West Grove Avenue 78.548 TSF Office building
3. OC Wine Mart & Deli 1691 East Lincoln Avenue 3.588 TSF Specialty Market and
Restaurant/deli establishment 7
City of Anaheim
4. Lake House 2901 – 2905 East South Street 20 DU Single-family
5. Best Cheer Stone Addition Building 3190 East Miraloma Avenue 53.000 TSF Warehouse
6. Brewery “X” 3191 East La Palma Avenue
47.000 TSF Manufacturing/storage/office
7.000 TSF Tasting Room
1.000 TSF Patio
5.000 TSF “Flex space” for private room
or additional tasting room area
2.500 TSF Retail
7. Anaheim Life Rebuilding Center 3431 East La Palma Avenue 200-bed Homeless Shelter
8. Link OC 1011 – 1091 North Tustin Avenue 406 DU Apartments
5.000 TSF Commercial
9. Tri Pointe Homes 4540 East Riverdale Avenue 75 DU Single-family
Notes
DU = Dwelling Units
TSF = Thousand Square-Feet
6 Source: Cities of Orange and Anaheim Planning Departments.
7 It has been assumed that 1,794 SF is Specialty Market and 1,794 SF is Restaurant/deli establishment.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
19
TABLE 6-2
CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST 8
Cumulative Project Description
Daily
2-Way
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
1. Simply Self Storage 237 10 6 16 13 14 27
2. MS International 765 78 13 91 14 76 90
3. OC Wine Mart & Deli 242 10 8 18 8 7 15
4. Lake House 189 4 11 15 13 7 20
5. Best Cheer Stone Addition Building 92 7 2 9 3 7 10
6. Brewery “X”9 555 -36 -4 -40 57 -2 55
7. Anaheim Life Rebuilding Center 10 168 14 0 14 0 14 14
8. Link OC 11 2,839 22 173 195 175 71 246
9. Tri Pointe Homes 708 14 42 56 47 27 74
Total Cumulative Projects
Trip Generation Forecast 5,795 123 251 374 330 221 551
8 Unless otherwise noted, Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017).
9 Source: Brewery X, Anaheim - Trip Generation Analysis, prepared by LSA, dated March 22, 2018.
10 Based on information provided by the City of Anaheim, the following trip generation assumptions were made:
• Daily = 14 employees x 4 trips per day x 3 shifts per day = 168 Daily Trips
• AM Peak Hour = Enter: 14 Employees, Exit: 0 Employees
• PM Peak Hour = Enter: 0 Employees, Exit: 14 Employees 11 Source: Traffic Impact Analysis for Link OC prepared by LSA, dated October 2017.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
20
7.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
The relative impact of the proposed Project during the AM peak hour/PM peak hour and on a daily
basis was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the three (3) key study
intersections and four (4) key roadway segments, without, then with the proposed Project. The
previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume-to-
capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection and roadway
segment. The significance of the potential impacts of the Project at each key intersection and key
roadway segment was then evaluated using the following traffic impact criteria.
7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds
Impacts to local and regional transportation systems located in the City of Orange are considered
significant if:
Intersections:
An unacceptable peak hour Level of Service (LOS) at any of the key intersections is projected.
According to the City’s Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact
Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that
should be maintained during the morning and evening peak hours on all intersections; and
The project increases traffic demand at the study intersection by 1% of capacity (ICU increase ≥
0.010), causing or worsening LOS E or LOS F (ICU > 0.900).
An unsignalized intersection impact is considered to be significant if the project causes an
intersection operating at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or LOS F, and the traffic signal
warrant analysis determines that a traffic signal is justified.
Roadway Segments:
An unacceptable daily Level of Service (LOS) at any of the key roadway segments is projected.
According to the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element and stated in the City of
Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum
acceptable condition that should be maintained on a daily basis on all roadway segments; and
The project increases traffic demand at the roadway segment by 1% of capacity (V/C increase ≥
0.010), causing or worsening LOS E or LOS F (V/C > 0.900).
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
21
7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios
The following scenarios are those for which volume/capacity calculations have been performed at
the three (3) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments for existing plus project and
near-term (Year 2021) traffic conditions:
(a) Existing Traffic Conditions;
(b) Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions;
(c) Scenario (b) with Improvements, if necessary;
(d) Near-Term (Year 2021) Cumulative Traffic Conditions,
(e) Near-Term (Year 2021) Cumulative plus Project Traffic Conditions; and
(f) Scenario (e) with Improvements, if necessary.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
22
8.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ANALYSIS
The following summarizes the “Existing Plus Project” level of service results for the three (3) key
study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments.
8.1 Intersections
Table 8-1 summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the three (3) key study intersections
for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values
in Table 8-1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions (which were
also presented in Table 3-4). The second column (2) lists existing plus project traffic conditions. The
third column (3) shows the increase in ICU and/or Delay value due to the added peak hour project
trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based
on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. The fourth column (4)
indicates the anticipated level of service with planned and/or recommended improvements.
8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions
Review of Columns (2) and (3) of Table 8-1 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed
Project will not significantly impact any of the three (3) key study intersections, when compared to
the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. Although the intersection
of Oceanview Avenue/Lincoln Avenue is forecast to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS
during the PM peak hour, this intersection is not impacted per the significant impact criteria
specified in this report, as the peak hour traffic signal warrant is not satisfied. The remaining two (2)
key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable
LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing
traffic.
Appendix C also presents the existing plus project ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the three
(3) key study intersections for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour and the traffic signal warrant
worksheets for the intersection of Oceanview Avenue/Lincoln Avenue.
8.2 Roadway Segments
Table 8-2 summarizes the roadway segment level of service results at the four (4) key roadway
segments for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) shows the number of
lanes, the second column (2) shows the arterial classification and the third column (3) shows the
existing LOS “E” capacity. The fourth column (4) presents a summary of existing daily traffic
conditions (which were also presented in Table 3-5). The fifth column (5) lists existing plus project
daily traffic conditions. Column (5) also shows the increase in V/C ratio value due to the added daily
project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant
impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
23
8.2.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions
Review of Column 5 of Table 8-2 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not
significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments when compared to the LOS standards
and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The four (4) key roadway segments currently
operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable service level on a daily basis with the
addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
24
TABLE 8-1
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Key Intersections
Time
Period
Minimum
Acceptable
LOS
(1)
Existing
Traffic Conditions
(2)
Existing
Plus Project
Traffic Conditions
(3)
Project
Significant
Impact
(4)
Existing
Plus Project
With Mitigation
ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS
1. Oceanview Avenue at AM D 21.8 s/v C 22.3 s/v C 0.5 s/v No -- --
Lincoln Avenue PM 39.9 s/v E 45.1 s/v E 5.2 s/v No [a] -- --
2. Canal Street at AM D 0.369 A 0.370 A 0.001 No -- --
Lincoln Avenue PM 0.563 A 0.564 A 0.001 No -- --
3. Canal Street at AM D 10.2 s/v B 10.2 s/v B 0.0 s/v No -- --
Heim Avenue PM 11.8 s/v B 11.8 s/v B 0.0 s/v No -- --
Notes:
s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay)
BOLD ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values indicate unacceptable service level
[a] = Although this intersection is forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS, this intersection is not impacted per the significant impact criteria specified in this report, as the peak hour traffic
signal warrant is not satisfied (refer to Section 7.1).
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
25
TABLE 8-2
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY
Key Roadway Segment
Min.
Acc.
LOS
(1)
No. of
Existing
Lanes
(2)
Arterial
Classification
(3)
Existing
Capacity
at LOS
“E”
(4)
Existing
Traffic Conditions
(5)
Existing Plus Project
Traffic Conditions
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS Inc.
Adverse
(Yes/No)
A. Lincoln Avenue
west of Oceanview Avenue D 4D Primary 37,500 25,941 0.692 B 26,069 0.695 B 0.003 No
B. Lincoln Avenue between
Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street D 4D Primary 37,500 28,342 0.756 C 28,580 0.762 C 0.006 No
C. Lincoln Avenue
east of Canal Street D 4D Primary 37,500 25,566 0.682 B 25,767 0.687 B 0.005 No
D. Canal Street
south of Lincoln Avenue D 2U Collector 12,000 6,072 0.506 A 6,109 0.509 A 0.003 No
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
26
9.0 YEAR 2021 PLUS PROJECT ANALYSIS
The following summarizes the “Year 2021 Plus Project” level of service results for the three (3) key
study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments.
9.1 Intersections
Table 9-1 summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the three (3) key study intersections
for Year 2021 traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values in Table 9-
1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions (which were also
presented in Table 3-4). The second column (2) lists projected cumulative traffic conditions (existing
plus ambient traffic plus cumulative project traffic) based on existing intersection geometry, but
without any traffic generated from the proposed Project. The third column (3) presents forecast Year
2021 near-term traffic conditions with the addition of Project traffic. The fourth column (4) shows
the increase in ICU and/or Delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates
whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS
standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. The fifth column (5) indicates the
anticipated level of service with planned and/or recommended improvements.
9.1.1 Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic Conditions
An analysis of future (Year 2021) cumulative traffic conditions indicates that the addition of ambient
traffic growth and cumulative project traffic will adversely impact one (1) of the three (3) key study
intersections. The remaining two (2) key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at
acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of ambient traffic
growth and cumulative project traffic. The location forecast to operate at an adverse LOS is as
follows:
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Key Intersection ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS
1. Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue -- -- 46.2 s/v E
9.1.2 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions
Review of Columns (3) and (4) of Table 9-1 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed
Project will not significantly any of the three (3) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS
standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. Although the intersection of
Oceanview Avenue/Lincoln Avenue is forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the PM
peak hour, this intersection is not impacted per the significant impact criteria specified in this report,
as the peak hour traffic signal warrant is not satisfied. The remaining two (2) key study intersections
currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and
PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2021 cumulative traffic.
Appendix C also presents the Year 2021 (without and with project) ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS
calculations for the three (3) key study intersections and the traffic signal warrant worksheets for the
intersection of Oceanview Avenue/Lincoln Avenue.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
27
9.2 Roadway Segments
Table 9-2 summarizes the roadway segment level of service results at the four (4) key roadway
segments for Year 2021 traffic conditions. The first column (1) shows the number of lanes, the
second column (2) shows the arterial classification and the third column (3) shows the existing LOS
“E” capacity. The fourth column (4) presents a summary of projected Year 2021 cumulative daily
traffic conditions. The fifth column (5) lists Year 2021 plus project daily traffic conditions. Column
(5) also shows the increase in V/C ratio value due to the added daily project trips and indicates
whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS
standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report.
9.2.1 Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic Conditions
An analysis of future (Year 2021) cumulative traffic conditions indicates that the addition of ambient
traffic growth and cumulative project traffic will not adversely impact any of the four (4) key
roadway segments on a daily basis under Year 2021 Cumulative traffic conditions (i.e. existing plus
ambient traffic plus cumulative project traffic). The four (4) key roadway segments currently operate
and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service on a daily basis with the
addition of ambient traffic growth and cumulative project traffic.
9.2.2 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions
Review of Column 5 of Table 9-2 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not
significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments on a daily basis under Year 2021
Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. The four (4) key roadway segments currently operate and
are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service on a daily basis with the addition
of Project generated traffic to Year 2021 cumulative traffic.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
28
TABLE 9-1
YEAR 2021 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Key Intersections
Time
Period
Minimum
Acceptable
LOS
(1)
Existing
Traffic Conditions
(2)
Year 2021
Cumulative
Traffic Conditions
(3)
Year 2021
Cumulative
Plus Project
Traffic Conditions
(4)
Project
Significant
Impact
(5)
Year 2021
Cumulative
Plus Project
With Mitigation
ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Inc. Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS
1. Oceanview Avenue at AM D 21.8 s/v C 23.3 s/v C 23.9 s/v C 0.6 s/v No -- --
Lincoln Avenue PM 39.9 s/v E 46.2 s/v E 52.8 s/v F 6.6 s/v No [a] -- --
2. Canal Street at AM D 0.369 A 0.382 A 0.383 A 0.001 No -- --
Lincoln Avenue PM 0.563 A 0.582 A 0.584 A 0.002 No -- --
3. Canal Street at AM D 10.2 s/v B 10.4 s/v B 10.4 s/v B 0.0 s/v No -- --
Heim Avenue PM 11.8 s/v B 12.2 s/v B 12.2 s/v B 0.0 s/v No -- --
Notes:
s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay)
BOLD ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values indicate unacceptable service level
[a] = Although this intersection is forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS, this intersection is not impacted per the significant impact criteria specified in this report, as the peak hour traffic
signal warrant is not satisfied (refer to Section 7.1).
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
29
TABLE 9-2
YEAR 2021 ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY
Key Roadway Segment
Min.
Acc.
LOS
(1)
No. of
Existing
Lanes
(2)
Arterial
Classification
(3)
Existing
Capacity
at LOS “E”
(4)
Year 2021 Cumulative
Traffic Conditions
(5)
Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project
Traffic Conditions
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS
Daily
Volume
V/C
Ratio LOS Inc.
Adverse
(Yes/No)
A. Lincoln Avenue
west of Oceanview Avenue D 4D Primary 37,500 26,961 0.719 C 27,089 0.722 C 0.003 No
B. Lincoln Avenue between
Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street D 4D Primary 37,500 29,434 0.785 C 29,672 0.791 C 0.006 No
C. Lincoln Avenue
east of Canal Street D 4D Primary 37,500 26,599 0.709 C 26,800 0.715 C 0.006 No
D. Canal Street
south of Lincoln Avenue D 2U Collector 12,000 6,278 0.523 A 6,315 0.526 A 0.003 No
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
30
10.0 SITE ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION EVALUATION
10.1 Site Access Evaluation
As shown previously in Figure 2-2, access to the proposed Project will be provided via one full
access unsignalized driveway located along Oceanview Avenue. It should be noted that a secondary
emergency access-only driveway will be provided along Lincoln Avenue.
Table 10-1 summarizes the intersection operations at the proposed project driveway for near-term
(Year 2021) traffic conditions at completion and full occupancy of the proposed Project. The
operations analysis for the Project driveway is based on the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition
(HCM 6) unsignalized methodology. Review of Table 11-1 shows that the proposed project
driveway is forecast to operate at acceptable LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours for Year
2021 traffic conditions. As such, project access will be adequate. Motorists entering and exiting the
project site will be able to do so comfortably, safely, and without undue congestion.
Appendix D presents the level of service calculation worksheets for the project driveway under Year
2021 Cumulative plus Project traffic conditions.
10.2 Internal Circulation Evaluation
The on-site circulation layout of the proposed Project as illustrated in Figure 2-2 on an overall basis
is adequate. Curb return radii have been confirmed and are generally adequate for small
service/delivery (FedEx, UPS) trucks and trash trucks.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3976.1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
31
TABLE 10-1
PROJECT DRIVEWAY PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY
Project Driveway
Time
Period
Intersection
Control
Year 2021
Cumulative Plus Project
Traffic Conditions
HCM LOS
A. Oceanview Avenue at AM One–Way 9.1 s/v A
Project Driveway PM Stop 9.2 s/v A
Note:
s/v = seconds per vehicle
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
32
11.0 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
For those intersections and roadway segments where projected traffic volumes are expected to result
in significant cumulative impacts, this report recommends traffic improvements that change the
intersection and/or roadway segment geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements
involve roadway widening and/or re-striping to reconfigure (add lanes) roadways to specific
approaches of a key intersection and/or roadway segment. The identified improvements are expected
to:
Address the impact of existing traffic, Project traffic and future non-project (ambient
traffic growth and Cumulative) traffic, and
Improve Levels of Service to an acceptable range and/or to pre-project conditions.
11.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions
The results of the “Existing Plus Project” intersection capacity analysis and daily roadway segment
analysis presented previously in Table 8-1 and Table 8-2, respectively, indicates that the proposed
Project will not significantly impact any of the three (3) key study intersections or the four (4) key
roadway segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are
required under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions.
11.2 Year 2021 Plus Project Traffic Conditions
The results of the “Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project” intersection capacity analysis and daily
roadway segment analysis presented previously in Table 9-1 and Table 9-2, respectively, indicates
that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the three (3) key study intersections or
the four (4) key roadway segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no
improvements are required under Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
33
12.0 PARKING ANALYSIS
Parking requirements for a proposed Project are typically based on parking code requirements
contained within the respective City’s Municipal Code. Review of the City of Orange Municipal
Code – Chapter 17.34, Off-Street Parking and Loading, Table 17.34.060.B indicates that there is not
a specific parking requirement listed for assisted living facilities. Therefore the parking
requirements for the proposed Project will be based on the following two methods:
Parking information contained in the 4th Edition of Parking Generation.
Parking requirements based on parking surveys for comparable sites.
12.1 Parking Requirements Per 4th Edition of Parking Generation
To determine the number of parking spaces required to support the proposed Project, the parking
demand was calculated using parking generation rates contained within the 4th Edition of Parking
Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington, D.C., 2010].
ITE’s 4th Edition of Parking Generation specifies the following weekday 85th percentile peak
parking rate for assisted living facilities:
ITE Land Use 254: Assisted Living: 0.54 spaces per unit.
As mentioned previously, the proposed Project will consist of a 93-unit assisted living and memory
care facility with a maximum of 120 total beds. Direct application of the aforementioned ITE
parking ratio to the project development totals (i.e. 93 units), results in a total parking requirement of
50 spaces. With a proposed on-site parking supply of 62 spaces, a parking surplus of 12 spaces is
forecast and the proposed Project will provide adequate parking.
12.2 Parking Requirements Based on Parking Surveys for Comparable Sites
To further validate the parking supply provided for the proposed Project, this section evaluates the
number of parking spaces required to support the proposed Project based on parking surveys
provided for two (2) other comparable Sunrise sites located in California, as contained in the
Supplemental Information Memorandum for the Sunrise Redwood City Project, dated November 17,
2017. The following sections describe the two survey sites from the aforementioned report and the
application of those developed parking rates to the proposed Project.
12.2.1 Description of Survey Sites
The following summarizes the location of the site, the size, the total parking supply, the percent
occupied during the parking surveys, the survey results and the recommended parking rate.
Sunrise – Palo Alto
Location = 2701 El Camino Real, Palo Alto
Size = 81 units for up to 97 residents
Parking Supply = 44 spaces
Percent Occupied During Parking Surveys = 93% (75 units and 89 residents)
Survey results = 36 occupied parking spaces (highest observed)
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
34
Parking rate per occupied unit = 0.48 spaces per occupied unit
Sunrise – Belmont
Location = 1010 Alameda de las Pulgas, Belmont
Size = 78 units for up to 89 residents
Parking Supply = 40 spaces
Percent Occupied During Parking Surveys = 92% (71 units and 82 residents)
Survey results = 26 occupied parking spaces (highest observed)
Parking rate per occupied unit = 0.37 spaces per occupied unit
Hourly parking surveys were conducted at both sites between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Tuesday
December 13, 2016 and Wednesday December 14, 2016 with supplemental surveys conducted in
January 2017.
Appendix E presents the Supplemental Information Memorandum for the Sunrise Redwood City
Project, dated November 17, 2017.
12.2.2 Parking Requirements – Proposed Project
Table 12-1 presents the parking requirements for the proposed Project. Column one (1) shows the
design peak parking rate based on the parking surveys, column two (2) shows the number of units
proposed for the Project and column three (3) presents the parking demand. Column four (4)
compares the parking demand with the proposed parking supply and indicates whether or not the
proposed Project will provide adequate parking.
Review of column four (4) of Table 12-1 shows that the proposed Project will provide adequate
parking using either design peak parking rate developed from the parking surveys (i.e. surplus of 17
spaces and surplus of 27 spaces). Therefore, the proposed parking supply of 62 spaces will be
sufficient to accommodate the expected peak parking demand of the proposed Project.
12.3 Parking Conclusions
In conclusion, the proposed Project will have adequate parking using either of the two
aforementioned methodologies (i.e. based on ITE 4th Edition of Parking Generation and based on
parking demand rates for comparable sites).
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
35
TABLE 12-1
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Senior Facility
(1)
Design Peak
Parking Rate12
(2)
Proposed
Project
Description
(3)
Parking
Demand
(4)
Comparison With
Proposed Parking Supply
Parking
Spaces
Surplus/
Deficiency (+/-)
Sunrise – Palo Alto 0.48 spaces per
occupied unit 93 units 45 62 +17
Sunrise - Belmont 0.37 spaces per
occupied unit 93 units 35 62 +27
12 Source: Supplemental Information Memorandum for the Sunrise Redwood City Project, dated November 17, 2017.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
36
13.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Project Description – The proposed project site is located at 1301 East Lincoln Avenue in the
City of Orange, California. The site is currently occupied with a 13,414 SF office building. The
proposed Project will consist of a 93-unit (120 total beds) assisted living and memory care
facility, of which 52 units are assisted living and 41 units are memory care. A total of 62 parking
spaces will be provided. The proposed Project is expected to be constructed and fully occupied
by the Year 2021.
Access to the proposed Project will be provided via one full access unsignalized driveway
located along Oceanview Avenue. It should be noted that a secondary emergency access-only
driveway will be provided along Lincoln Avenue
Study Scope – The three (3) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments selected
for evaluation were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering
staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of
Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The intersections and
roadway segments listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the
boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. It should be noted that each key study
intersection and roadway segment is located within the City of Orange.
Key Study Intersections
1. Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
2. Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
3. Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Key Roadway Segments
A. Lincoln Avenue, west of Oceanview Avenue
B. Lincoln Avenue, between Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street
C. Lincoln Avenue, east of Canal Street
D. Canal Street, south of Lincoln Avenue
Detailed peak hour level of service analyses were prepared for Existing Traffic Conditions,
Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions, Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic Conditions, and Year
2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions at these locations.
Existing Traffic Conditions – One (1) key study intersection currently operates at an
unacceptable LOS during the PM peak hour. The remaining two (2) key study intersections
currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). The location operating at an
adverse LOS is as follows:
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Key Intersection ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS
1. Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue -- -- 39.9 s/v E
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
37
Project Trip Generation – The proposed Project, prior to taking credit for the existing land use is
forecast to generate 497 daily trips, 22 AM peak hour trips (15 inbound, 7 outbound) and 35 PM
peak hour trips (18 inbound, 17 outbound). The existing office building currently generates 131
daily trips, 16 AM peak hour trips and 15 PM peak hour trips. With application of existing trip
credits, the proposed Project is forecast to generate a net of 366 daily trips, a net of 6 AM peak
hour trips (1 inbound, 5 outbound) and a net of 20 PM peak hour trips (16 inbound, 4 outbound).
The potential traffic impacts of the aforementioned net Project trips are evaluated in the traffic
impact analysis.
Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics – The nine (9) cumulative projects are forecast to
generate a total of 5,795 daily trips, with 374 trips (123 inbound and 251 outbound) forecast
during the AM peak hour and 551 trips (330 inbound and 221 outbound) forecast during the PM
peak hour.
Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions – The proposed Project will not significantly impact
any of the three (3) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant
impact criteria specified in this report. Although the intersection of Oceanview Avenue/Lincoln
Avenue is forecast to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the PM peak hour, this
intersection is not impacted per the significant impact criteria specified in this report, as the peak
hour traffic signal warrant is not satisfied. The remaining two (2) key study intersections
currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and
PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic.
The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments
when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The
four (4) key roadway segments currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an
acceptable service level on a daily basis with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing
traffic.
Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions – The proposed Project will not
significantly any of the three (3) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards
and significant impact criteria specified in this report. Although the intersection of Oceanview
Avenue/Lincoln Avenue is forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the PM peak hour,
this intersection is not impacted per the significant impact criteria specified in this report, as the
peak hour traffic signal warrant is not satisfied. The remaining two (2) key study intersections
currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and
PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2021 cumulative traffic.
The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments on a
daily basis under Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. The four (4) key
roadway segments currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable level
of service on a daily basis with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2021 cumulative
traffic.
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project TIA, Orange 10-19-18.doc
38
Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation – The proposed project driveway is forecast to
operate at acceptable LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours for Year 2021 traffic conditions.
As such, project access will be adequate. Motorists entering and exiting the project site will be
able to do so comfortably, safely, and without undue congestion.
The on-site circulation layout of the proposed Project on an overall basis is adequate. Curb return
radii have been confirmed and are generally adequate for small service/delivery (FedEx, UPS)
trucks and trash trucks.
Existing Plus Project Recommended Improvements – The proposed Project will not
significantly impact any of the three (3) key study intersections or the four (4) key roadway
segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required
under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions.
Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Recommended Improvements – The proposed Project will
not significantly impact any of the three (3) key study intersections or the four (4) key roadway
segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required
under Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions.
Parking Analysis – Direct application of the ITE 4th Edition of Parking Generation ratio for
Assisted Living facilities to the project development totals (i.e. 93 units), results in a total
parking requirement of 50 spaces. With a proposed on-site parking supply of 62 spaces, a parking
surplus of 12 spaces is forecast and the proposed Project will provide adequate parking.
The proposed Project will provide adequate parking using either design peak parking rate (i.e.
0.48 spaces per occupied unit or 0.37 spaces per occupied unit) developed from the parking
surveys (i.e. surplus of 17 spaces and surplus of 27 spaces). Therefore, the proposed parking
supply of 62 spaces will be sufficient to accommodate the expected peak parking demand of the
proposed Project.
In conclusion, the proposed Project will have adequate parking using either of the two
aforementioned methodologies (i.e. based on ITE 4th Edition of Parking Generation and based
on parking demand rates for comparable sites).
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Dividers.doc
APPENDIX A
TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE OF WORK
A-1
A-2
Mr. Doug Keys
September 5, 2018
Page 2
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Scope of Work\3976 TIA Scope of Work 09-05-18.doc
Key Roadway Segments
A. Lincoln Avenue, west of Oceanview Avenue
B. Lincoln Avenue, between Oceanview Avenue and Canal Street
C. Lincoln Avenue, east of Canal Street
D. Canal Street, south of Lincoln Avenue
D. Traffic Counts: The traffic counts for the above listed intersections and roadway
segments will be conducted on a Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday when local
schools are in session.
E. Project Traffic Generation: See the attached project traffic generation forecast
– Table 5-1. As shown in the upper portion of Table 5-1, the trip generation
potential of the existing land use will be estimated using ITE Land Use 710:
General Office Building trip rates and the trip generation potential of the proposed
Project will be estimated using ITE Land Use 254: Assisted Living trip rates
contained in the 10th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE), [Washington, D.C., 2017]. As shown at the
bottom of Table 5-1, the proposed Project will generate 366 greater “net” daily
trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 6 greater “net” trips (1
inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 20 greater “net” trips
(16 inbound, 4 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a “typical” weekday
compared to the existing use.
F. Project Trip Distribution Pattern: See the attached project traffic distribution
pattern – Figure 5-1. The project trip distribution pattern was developed based on
the following considerations:
directional flows on the freeways in the immediate vicinity of the project site,
the site's proximity to major traffic carriers,
expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization
and presence of traffic signals, and
ingress/egress availability at the project site.
G. Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic:
Ambient Growth Rate: 1.0% per year.
Cumulative Projects: Obtain information regarding cumulative projects in the
vicinity of the proposed project (i.e. 2-mile radius) from the City of Orange
and City of Anaheim.
A-3
Mr. Doug Keys
September 5, 2018
Page 3
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Scope of Work\3976 TIA Scope of Work 09-05-18.doc
H. Analysis Scenarios: The following traffic analysis scenarios will be prepared for
the proposed Project.
(a) Existing Traffic Conditions;
(b) Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions;
(c) Scenario (b) with Mitigation, if necessary;
(d) Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic Conditions (Existing plus Ambient Growth
plus Cumulative Projects);
(e) Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions; and
(f) Scenario (e) with Mitigation, if necessary.
The LOS calculations will be based on the ICU methodology for signalized
intersections and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for
unsignalized intersections, and the Orange County MPAH methodology for
roadway segments. The Project’s potential impact will be based on the significant
impact criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines,
dated August 15, 2007.
I. Other Issues:
Evaluate Site Access and Internal Circulation.
Traffic Signal Warrants, as needed.
Parking Analysis.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this scope of work. Should you have any
questions, please call us at (949) 825-6175. Thank you.
Approved by:
________________________________________
City of Orange Date
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Scope of Work\3976 TIA Scope of Work 09-05-18.doc
TABLE 5-1
PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST 1
ITE Land Use Code /
Project Description
Daily
2-Way
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total
Generation Rates:
ITE 254: Assisted Living (TE/Occupied Beds) 4.14 68% 32% 0.18 50% 50% 0.29
ITE 710: General Office Building (TE/TSF) 9.74 86% 14% 1.16 16% 84% 1.15
Generation Forecasts:
[A]. Proposed Project
Sunrise Assisted Living Project (120 Beds) 497 15 7 22 18 17 35
[B]. Existing Land Use
Existing Office Building (13,414 SF) 131 14 2 16 2 13 15
Total “Net Increase” Project Trip Generation:
Proposed Project Minus Existing Land Use [A] – [B] 366 1 5 6 16 4 20
Notes:
TE/Occupied Beds = Trip End per Occupied Beds
TE/TSF = Trip End per Thousand Square Feet
1 Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017).
A-8
A-9
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Dividers.doc
APPENDIX B
EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA
B-1
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX B-I
INTERSECTION COUNTS
B-2
File Name : H1805087
Site Code : 00005701
Start Date : 5/24/2018
Page No : 1
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE
E-W Direction: LINCOLN AVENUE
Groups Printed- Turning Movements
N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE
Southbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Westbound
DEAD EMD
Northbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total
07:00 5 0 11 2 130 0 0 0 0 0 170 3 321
07:15 2 0 5 4 136 0 0 0 0 0 203 3 353
07:30 5 0 10 7 148 0 0 0 0 0 191 2 363
07:45 11 0 7 4 217 0 0 0 0 0 216 4 459
Total 23 0 33 17 631 0 0 0 0 0 780 12 1496
08:00 4 0 7 11 184 0 0 0 0 0 196 4 406
08:15 6 0 10 10 144 0 0 0 0 0 201 5 376
08:30 9 0 0 14 145 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 314
08:45 4 0 5 8 143 0 0 0 0 0 158 4 322
Total 23 0 22 43 616 0 0 0 0 0 701 13 1418
*** BREAK ***
16:00 6 0 9 6 187 0 0 0 0 0 245 6 459
16:15 3 0 7 6 218 0 0 0 0 0 292 6 532
16:30 9 0 4 12 220 0 0 0 0 0 315 3 563
16:45 8 0 3 15 205 0 0 0 0 0 319 3 553
Total 26 0 23 39 830 0 0 0 0 0 1171 18 2107
17:00 5 0 6 12 260 0 0 0 0 0 284 3 570
17:15 6 0 5 8 248 0 0 0 0 0 346 5 618
17:30 7 0 7 12 240 0 0 0 0 0 340 7 613
17:45 6 0 2 13 253 0 0 0 0 0 338 3 615
Total 24 0 20 45 1001 0 0 0 0 0 1308 18 2416
Grand Total 96 0 98 144 3078 0 0 0 0 0 3960 61 7437
Apprch %49.5 0 50.5 4.5 95.5 0 0 0 0 0 98.5 1.5
Total %1.3 0 1.3 1.9 41.4 0 0 0 0 0 53.2 0.8
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-3
File Name : H1805087
Site Code : 00005701
Start Date : 5/24/2018
Page No : 2
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE
E-W Direction: LINCOLN AVENUE
N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE
Southbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Westbound
DEAD EMD
Northbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
07:30 5 0 10 15 7 148 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 191 2 193 363
07:45 11 0 7 18 4 217 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 216 4 220 459
08:00 4 0 7 11 11 184 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 196 4 200 406
08:15 6 0 10 16 10 144 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 201 5 206 376
Total Volume 26 0 34 60 32 693 0 725 0 0 0 0 0 804 15 819 1604
% App. Total 43.3 0 56.7 4.4 95.6 0 0 0 0 0 98.2 1.8
PHF .591 .000 .850 .833 .727 .798 .000 .820 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .931 .750 .931 .874
N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE DEAD EMD
Right
26
Thru
0
Left
34
InOut Total
47 60 107 Right32 Thru693 Left0 OutTotalIn838 725 1563 Left
0
Thru
0
Right
0
Out TotalIn
0 0 0 Left15 Thru804 Right0 TotalOutIn719 819 1538 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30
Turning Movements
Peak Hour Data
North
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-4
File Name : H1805087
Site Code : 00005701
Start Date : 5/24/2018
Page No : 3
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE
E-W Direction: LINCOLN AVENUE
N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE
Southbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Westbound
DEAD EMD
Northbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 5 0 6 11 12 260 0 272 0 0 0 0 0 284 3 287 570
17:15 6 0 5 11 8 248 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 346 5 351 618
17:30 7 0 7 14 12 240 0 252 0 0 0 0 0 340 7 347 613
17:45 6 0 2 8 13 253 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 338 3 341 615
Total Volume 24 0 20 44 45 1001 0 1046 0 0 0 0 0 1308 18 1326 2416
% App. Total 54.5 0 45.5 4.3 95.7 0 0 0 0 0 98.6 1.4
PHF .857 .000 .714 .786 .865 .963 .000 .961 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .945 .643 .944 .977
N. OCEANVIEW AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE DEAD EMD
Right
24
Thru
0
Left
20
InOut Total
63 44 107 Right45 Thru1001 Left0 OutTotalIn1328 1046 2374 Left
0
Thru
0
Right
0
Out TotalIn
0 0 0 Left18 Thru1308 Right0 TotalOutIn1025 1326 2351 Peak Hour Begins at 17:00
Turning Movements
Peak Hour Data
North
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-5
File Name : H1805088
Site Code : 00005701
Start Date : 5/24/2018
Page No : 1
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: N. CANAL STREET
E-W Direction: LINCOLN AVENUE
Groups Printed- Turning Movements
DEAD END
Southbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Westbound
N. CANAL STREET
Northbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total
07:00 0 0 0 0 160 7 18 0 17 24 153 0 379
07:15 0 0 0 0 112 6 15 0 19 14 205 0 371
07:30 0 0 0 0 188 8 24 0 13 30 187 0 450
07:45 0 0 0 0 236 21 25 0 19 27 182 0 510
Total 0 0 0 0 696 42 82 0 68 95 727 0 1710
08:00 0 0 0 0 167 20 18 0 18 37 178 0 438
08:15 0 0 0 0 147 20 23 0 17 25 147 0 379
08:30 0 0 0 0 150 11 14 0 19 23 132 0 349
08:45 0 0 0 0 142 11 17 0 16 27 155 0 368
Total 0 0 0 0 606 62 72 0 70 112 612 0 1534
*** BREAK ***
16:00 0 0 0 0 147 9 18 0 26 77 203 0 480
16:15 0 0 0 0 208 20 22 0 34 28 267 0 579
16:30 0 0 0 0 185 19 27 0 32 36 213 0 512
16:45 0 0 0 0 199 20 13 0 41 49 307 0 629
Total 0 0 0 0 739 68 80 0 133 190 990 0 2200
17:00 0 0 0 0 208 19 19 0 43 41 265 0 595
17:15 0 0 0 0 228 19 28 0 42 49 266 0 632
17:30 0 0 0 0 190 15 39 0 31 43 263 0 581
17:45 0 0 0 0 224 16 11 0 42 43 211 0 547
Total 0 0 0 0 850 69 97 0 158 176 1005 0 2355
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 2891 241 331 0 429 573 3334 0 7799
Apprch %0 0 0 0 92.3 7.7 43.6 0 56.4 14.7 85.3 0
Total %0 0 0 0 37.1 3.1 4.2 0 5.5 7.3 42.7 0
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-6
File Name : H1805088
Site Code : 00005701
Start Date : 5/24/2018
Page No : 2
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: N. CANAL STREET
E-W Direction: LINCOLN AVENUE
DEAD END
Southbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Westbound
N. CANAL STREET
Northbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 188 8 196 24 0 13 37 30 187 0 217 450
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 236 21 257 25 0 19 44 27 182 0 209 510
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 167 20 187 18 0 18 36 37 178 0 215 438
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 147 20 167 23 0 17 40 25 147 0 172 379
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 738 69 807 90 0 67 157 119 694 0 813 1777
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 91.4 8.6 57.3 0 42.7 14.6 85.4 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .782 .821 .785 .900 .000 .882 .892 .804 .928 .000 .937 .871
DEAD END LINCOLN AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE N. CANAL STREET
Right
0
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 0 0 Right0 Thru738 Left69 OutTotalIn784 807 1591 Left
67
Thru
0
Right
90
Out TotalIn
188 157 345 Left0 Thru694 Right119 TotalOutIn805 813 1618 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30
Turning Movements
Peak Hour Data
North
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-7
File Name : H1805088
Site Code : 00005701
Start Date : 5/24/2018
Page No : 3
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: N. CANAL STREET
E-W Direction: LINCOLN AVENUE
DEAD END
Southbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Westbound
N. CANAL STREET
Northbound
LINCOLN AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 199 20 219 13 0 41 54 49 307 0 356 629
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 208 19 227 19 0 43 62 41 265 0 306 595
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 228 19 247 28 0 42 70 49 266 0 315 632
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 190 15 205 39 0 31 70 43 263 0 306 581
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 825 73 898 99 0 157 256 182 1101 0 1283 2437
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 91.9 8.1 38.7 0 61.3 14.2 85.8 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .905 .913 .909 .635 .000 .913 .914 .929 .897 .000 .901 .964
DEAD END LINCOLN AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE N. CANAL STREET
Right
0
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 0 0 Right0 Thru825 Left73 OutTotalIn1200 898 2098 Left
157
Thru
0
Right
99
Out TotalIn
255 256 511 Left0 Thru1101 Right182 TotalOutIn982 1283 2265 Peak Hour Begins at 16:45
Turning Movements
Peak Hour Data
North
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-8
File Name : H1809040
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/11/2018
Page No : 1
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: CANAL STREET
E-W Direction: HEIM AVENUE
Groups Printed- Turning Movements
CANAL STREET
Southbound
HEIM AVENUE
Westbound
CANAL STREET
Northbound
HEIM AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total
07:00 4 18 5 7 13 8 13 19 4 4 18 1 114
07:15 1 29 8 1 18 13 7 13 11 9 15 2 127
07:30 8 40 8 6 28 19 11 10 29 18 18 8 203
07:45 6 27 3 5 35 24 16 20 34 27 45 8 250
Total 19 114 24 19 94 64 47 62 78 58 96 19 694
08:00 10 29 7 2 23 12 16 17 17 28 26 7 194
08:15 5 16 3 3 12 17 7 15 16 12 14 6 126
08:30 1 27 3 1 10 9 11 10 10 10 20 2 114
08:45 1 20 6 1 7 15 12 24 11 4 6 2 109
Total 17 92 19 7 52 53 46 66 54 54 66 17 543
*** BREAK ***
16:00 3 42 10 7 23 13 16 48 20 16 20 4 222
16:15 2 40 12 6 10 17 20 36 15 6 18 2 184
16:30 0 25 10 9 15 11 19 51 16 23 24 4 207
16:45 5 31 7 7 26 11 24 52 17 8 15 3 206
Total 10 138 39 29 74 52 79 187 68 53 77 13 819
17:00 1 46 9 6 14 14 27 56 17 12 16 2 220
17:15 1 41 11 4 13 25 21 52 23 4 14 5 214
17:30 5 44 15 7 18 21 19 47 13 11 25 2 227
17:45 1 52 20 15 13 18 17 53 12 14 15 5 235
Total 8 183 55 32 58 78 84 208 65 41 70 14 896
Grand Total 54 527 137 87 278 247 256 523 265 206 309 63 2952
Apprch %7.5 73.4 19.1 14.2 45.4 40.4 24.5 50.1 25.4 35.6 53.5 10.9
Total %1.8 17.9 4.6 2.9 9.4 8.4 8.7 17.7 9 7 10.5 2.1
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-9
File Name : H1809040
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/11/2018
Page No : 2
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: CANAL STREET
E-W Direction: HEIM AVENUE
CANAL STREET
Southbound
HEIM AVENUE
Westbound
CANAL STREET
Northbound
HEIM AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 1 29 8 38 1 18 13 32 7 13 11 31 9 15 2 26 127
07:30 8 40 8 56 6 28 19 53 11 10 29 50 18 18 8 44 203
07:45 6 27 3 36 5 35 24 64 16 20 34 70 27 45 8 80 250
08:00 10 29 7 46 2 23 12 37 16 17 17 50 28 26 7 61 194
Total Volume 25 125 26 176 14 104 68 186 50 60 91 201 82 104 25 211 774
% App. Total 14.2 71 14.8 7.5 55.9 36.6 24.9 29.9 45.3 38.9 49.3 11.8
PHF .625 .781 .813 .786 .583 .743 .708 .727 .781 .750 .669 .718 .732 .578 .781 .659 .774
CANAL STREET HEIM AVENUE HEIM AVENUE CANAL STREET
Right
25
Thru
125
Left
26
InOut Total
99 176 275 Right14 Thru104 Left68 OutTotalIn180 186 366 Left
91
Thru
60
Right
50
Out TotalIn
275 201 476 Left25 Thru104 Right82 TotalOutIn220 211 431 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15
Turning Movements
Peak Hour Data
North
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-10
File Name : H1809040
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 9/11/2018
Page No : 3
City: ORANGE
N-S Direction: CANAL STREET
E-W Direction: HEIM AVENUE
CANAL STREET
Southbound
HEIM AVENUE
Westbound
CANAL STREET
Northbound
HEIM AVENUE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 1 46 9 56 6 14 14 34 27 56 17 100 12 16 2 30 220
17:15 1 41 11 53 4 13 25 42 21 52 23 96 4 14 5 23 214
17:30 5 44 15 64 7 18 21 46 19 47 13 79 11 25 2 38 227
17:45 1 52 20 73 15 13 18 46 17 53 12 82 14 15 5 34 235
Total Volume 8 183 55 246 32 58 78 168 84 208 65 357 41 70 14 125 896
% App. Total 3.3 74.4 22.4 19 34.5 46.4 23.5 58.3 18.2 32.8 56 11.2
PHF .400 .880 .688 .842 .533 .806 .780 .913 .778 .929 .707 .893 .732 .700 .700 .822 .953
CANAL STREET HEIM AVENUE HEIM AVENUE CANAL STREET
Right
8
Thru
183
Left
55
InOut Total
254 246 500 Right32 Thru58 Left78 OutTotalIn209 168 377 Left
65
Thru
208
Right
84
Out TotalIn
302 357 659 Left14 Thru70 Right41 TotalOutIn131 125 256 Peak Hour Begins at 17:00
Turning Movements
Peak Hour Data
North
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
B-11
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX B-II
ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS
B-12
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
ORANGESite::LINCOLN AVENUELocation
Date::W/O OCEANVIEW AVENUESegment 05/23/18
:LL&GClient
Interval Combined Day:EB WB Wednesday
Begin PMAMPMAMPMAM
12:00 57 256 1,023 29 86 160 698 143 1,7212241651
12:15 296 22 16412 46034
12:30 275 21 17213 44734
12:45 196 14 20210 39824
01:00 51 212 808 14 48 182 717 99 1,525439418
01:15 215 14 16717 38231
01:30 194 12 20214 39626
01:45 187 8 16616 35324
02:00 45 207 886 11 31 172 681 76 1,5671137922
02:15 223 8 16410 38718
02:30 260 6 17414 43420
02:45 196 6 17110 36716
03:00 54 212 1,027 14 61 184 796 115 1,8231139625
03:15 239 16 2068 44524
03:30 272 13 19620 46833
03:45 304 18 21015 51433
04:00 97 343 1,303 19 154 186 776 251 2,0792552944
04:15 352 32 20119 55351
04:30 288 48 19827 48675
04:45 320 55 19126 51181
05:00 271 360 1,309 42 183 204 925 454 2,23460564102
05:15 311 42 22848 53990
05:30 332 38 25482 586120
05:45 306 61 23981 545142
06:00 610 284 929 60 327 233 799 937 1,728101517161
06:15 258 72 198128 456200
06:30 184 77 194172 378249
06:45 203 118 174209 377327
07:00 906 164 701 142 710 156 595 1,616 1,296202320344
07:15 172 129 154224 326353
07:30 201 185 161226 362411
07:45 164 254 124254 288508
08:00 814 122 472 188 669 152 530 1,483 1,002216274404
08:15 130 165 142209 272374
08:30 114 167 122180 236347
08:45 106 149 114209 220358
09:00 863 104 367 146 599 123 410 1,462 777230227376
09:15 100 174 99219 199393
09:30 81 132 94214 175346
09:45 82 147 94200 176347
10:00 759 64 230 143 578 72 242 1,337 472190136333
10:15 64 142 68158 132300
10:30 55 139 50220 105359
10:45 47 154 52191 99345
11:00 853 28 115 124 591 59 185 1,444 30022987353
11:15 38 128 46183 84311
11:30 19 153 36209 55362
11:45 30 186 44232 74418
Totals 5,380 9,170 4,037 7,354 9,417 16,524
Split%55.5 42.9 44.557.1
Day Totals 11,391 25,94114,550
Day Splits 56.1 43.9
Peak Hour 07:15 04:45 07:30 05:15 07:30 05:00
Volume 920 1,323 792 954 1,697 2,234
Factor 0.91 0.92 0.78 0.94 0.84 0.95
Printed :6/1/2018Data File :D1805075*
B-13
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
ORANGESite::LINCOLN AVENUELocation
Date::OCEANVIEW AVE TO CANAL STREETSegment 05/23/18
:LL&GClient
Interval Combined Day:EB WB Wednesday
Begin PMAMPMAMPMAM
12:00 52 222 912 37 105 235 987 157 1,8992045757
12:15 281 18 23511 51629
12:30 221 28 23712 45840
12:45 188 22 2809 46831
01:00 57 174 750 16 54 246 987 111 1,737642022
01:15 188 18 23515 42333
01:30 195 10 26319 45829
01:45 193 10 24317 43627
02:00 47 219 839 14 34 255 993 81 1,832847422
02:15 212 9 23411 44620
02:30 220 6 23217 45223
02:45 188 5 27211 46016
03:00 52 192 889 24 81 244 1,094 133 1,9831243636
03:15 218 24 2927 51031
03:30 245 12 26819 51331
03:45 234 21 29014 52435
04:00 106 314 1,153 20 164 274 1,079 270 2,2322358843
04:15 302 36 28921 59157
04:30 255 54 27135 52689
04:45 282 54 24527 52781
05:00 283 305 1,111 43 209 284 1,220 492 2,3315658999
05:15 272 54 30859 580113
05:30 274 38 34083 614121
05:45 260 74 28885 548159
06:00 606 246 813 60 412 283 1,039 1,018 1,852118529178
06:15 206 90 246133 452223
06:30 196 102 274170 470272
06:45 165 160 236185 401345
07:00 881 170 633 162 868 195 777 1,749 1,410220365382
07:15 182 160 208208 390368
07:30 140 260 216215 356475
07:45 141 286 158238 299524
08:00 727 113 470 236 856 210 718 1,583 1,188180323416
08:15 154 202 186187 340389
08:30 98 240 164199 262439
08:45 105 178 158161 263339
09:00 778 92 342 176 722 178 547 1,500 889218270394
09:15 88 196 130197 218393
09:30 82 165 106186 188351
09:45 80 185 133177 213362
10:00 679 65 221 193 760 95 315 1,439 536161160354
10:15 59 186 91154 150340
10:30 59 199 66176 125375
10:45 38 182 63188 101370
11:00 787 25 121 154 805 64 207 1,592 32820189355
11:15 39 178 52175 91353
11:30 30 224 52207 82431
11:45 27 249 39204 66453
Totals 5,055 8,254 5,070 9,963 10,125 18,217
Split%45.3 50.1 54.749.9
Day Totals 15,033 28,34213,309
Day Splits 47.0 53.0
Peak Hour 07:00 04:00 07:30 05:00 07:30 05:00
Volume 881 1,153 984 1,220 1,804 2,331
Factor 0.93 0.92 0.86 0.90 0.86 0.95
Printed :6/1/2018Data File :D1805076*
B-14
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
ORANGESite::LINCOLN AVENUELocation
Date::E/O CANAL STREETSegment 05/23/18
:LL&GClient
Interval Combined Day:EB WB Wednesday
Begin PMAMPMAMPMAM
12:00 55 190 766 28 97 222 916 152 1,6821841246
12:15 222 23 21015 43238
12:30 200 28 2089 40837
12:45 154 18 27613 43031
01:00 44 172 678 15 55 242 934 99 1,612541420
01:15 178 19 23813 41632
01:30 164 13 26412 42825
01:45 164 8 19014 35422
02:00 45 180 704 14 39 214 923 84 1,6271039424
02:15 180 11 22210 40221
02:30 183 7 22312 40619
02:45 161 7 26413 42520
03:00 48 174 801 21 75 244 1,031 123 1,8321041831
03:15 196 22 2808 47630
03:30 208 14 23218 44032
03:45 223 18 27512 49830
04:00 97 248 971 19 163 227 976 260 1,9471847537
04:15 256 29 27522 53151
04:30 229 54 24630 47584
04:45 238 61 22827 46688
05:00 254 278 974 46 196 253 1,187 450 2,16154531100
05:15 214 50 29646 51096
05:30 257 38 34676 603114
05:45 225 62 29278 517140
06:00 536 212 709 60 357 284 980 893 1,68997496157
06:15 196 75 222117 418192
06:30 154 88 248152 402240
06:45 147 134 226170 373304
07:00 793 135 495 148 806 206 699 1,599 1,194170341318
07:15 126 132 186200 312332
07:30 134 218 169207 303425
07:45 100 308 138216 238524
08:00 673 113 405 236 836 178 604 1,509 1,009175291411
08:15 111 218 162178 273396
08:30 96 210 138156 234366
08:45 85 172 126164 211336
09:00 678 88 298 169 693 141 482 1,371 780174229343
09:15 78 194 126178 204372
09:30 70 168 99164 169332
09:45 62 162 116162 178324
10:00 579 52 189 187 736 90 273 1,315 462152142339
10:15 54 177 66123 120300
10:30 44 182 59162 103344
10:45 39 190 58142 97332
11:00 651 26 105 160 764 61 196 1,415 30116087320
11:15 34 174 44149 78323
11:30 19 196 50154 69350
11:45 26 234 41188 67422
Totals 4,453 7,095 4,817 9,201 9,270 16,296
Split%43.5 52.0 56.548.0
Day Totals 14,018 25,56611,548
Day Splits 45.2 54.8
Peak Hour 07:15 04:15 07:30 05:15 07:30 05:00
Volume 798 1,001 980 1,218 1,756 2,161
Factor 0.92 0.90 0.80 0.88 0.84 0.90
Printed :6/1/2018Data File :D1805077*
B-15
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Suite L
Tustin, CA. 92780
ORANGESite::CANAL STREETLocation
Date::S/O LINCOLN AVENUESegment 09/11/18
:LL&GClient
Interval Combined Day:SB NB Tuesday
Begin PMAMPMAMPMAM
12:00 18 51 167 9 25 44 173 43 34039512
12:15 38 8 548 9216
12:30 44 2 413 855
12:45 34 6 344 6810
01:00 9 37 171 2 6 41 187 15 3584786
01:15 42 2 542 964
01:30 48 2 420 902
01:45 44 0 503 943
02:00 6 52 222 0 9 50 197 15 41921022
02:15 56 2 550 1112
02:30 56 4 361 925
02:45 58 3 563 1146
03:00 12 57 218 0 8 60 206 20 42401170
03:15 58 3 454 1037
03:30 49 4 628 11112
03:45 54 1 390 931
04:00 10 56 241 2 9 56 228 19 46901122
04:15 69 2 622 1314
04:30 56 2 644 1206
04:45 60 3 464 1067
05:00 29 64 273 2 29 60 236 58 509812410
05:15 74 4 605 1349
05:30 69 7 526 12113
05:45 66 16 6410 13026
06:00 69 66 260 18 86 53 222 155 4821011928
06:15 64 21 4910 11331
06:30 63 15 7415 13730
06:45 67 32 4634 11366
07:00 202 52 245 38 158 64 198 360 4431811656
07:15 79 38 3248 11186
07:30 60 44 4670 106114
07:45 54 38 5666 110104
08:00 179 38 124 40 121 44 144 300 268498289
08:15 35 32 3952 7484
08:30 30 23 2624 5647
08:45 21 26 3554 5680
09:00 147 26 96 34 120 32 114 267 210485882
09:15 30 30 3830 6860
09:30 12 32 2033 3265
09:45 28 24 2436 5260
10:00 182 24 79 36 143 21 84 325 163324568
10:15 23 43 2932 5275
10:30 21 32 1680 37112
10:45 11 32 1838 2970
11:00 183 14 39 34 154 14 34 337 73372871
11:15 6 44 1040 1684
11:30 10 38 446 1484
11:45 9 38 660 1598
Totals 1,046 2,135 868 2,023 1,914 4,158
Split%51.3 45.4 48.754.6
Day Totals 2,891 6,0723,181
Day Splits 52.4 47.6
Peak Hour 07:30 05:15 07:15 05:45 07:15 05:00
Volume 237 275 160 240 393 509
Factor 0.85 0.93 0.91 0.81 0.86 0.95
Printed :9/17/2018Data File :D1809060*
B-16
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Dividers.doc
APPENDIX C
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
C-1
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX C-I
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
C-2
0.178Volume to Capacity (v/c):
DLevel Of Service:
27.5Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
32693804152634Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
8173201479Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
32693804152634Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
32693804152634Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-3
DIntersection LOS
0.90d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AACApproach LOS
0.000.1721.80d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.001.3120.4220.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.050.820.8295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAABDMovement LOS
0.000.000.009.1914.3327.51d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.020.040.18V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-4
0.369Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
738691196949067Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
18517301742317Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
738691196949067Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
738691196949067Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-5
0.369Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.220.040.240.240.010.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-6
0.296Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
10.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
141046882104252512526506091Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
42617212666317131523Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
141046882104252512526506091Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
141046882104252512526506091Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-7
BIntersection LOS
10.22Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
10.3010.1410.0710.35Approach Delay [s/veh]
27.8330.8625.5530.2295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.111.231.021.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.270.300.260.29Degree of Utilization, x
678714685690Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-8
0.253Volume to Capacity (v/c):
FLevel Of Service:
60.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
4510011308182420Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
11250327565Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
4510011308182420Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
4510011308182420Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-9
FIntersection LOS
0.81d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAEApproach LOS
0.000.1439.91d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.002.1029.5729.5795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.081.181.1895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAABCFMovement LOS
0.000.000.0010.6022.4960.80d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.030.050.25V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-10
0.563Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
82573182110199157Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
20618462752539Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
82573182110199157Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
82573182110199157Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-11
0.563Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.240.040.380.380.020.09V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-12
0.504Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
11.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
3258784170148183558420865Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
815201018424614215216Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
3258784170148183558420865Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
3258784170148183558420865Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-13
BIntersection LOS
11.81Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
10.8310.0711.4313.13Approach Delay [s/veh]
26.9318.2342.0571.5595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.080.731.682.8695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.270.200.370.50Degree of Utilization, x
627634672708Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-14
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX C-II
EXISTING WITH PROJECT
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
C-15
0.194Volume to Capacity (v/c):
DLevel Of Service:
28.0Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
33693804152837Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
8173201479Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
33693804152837Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
33693804152837Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-16
DIntersection LOS
0.98d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AACApproach LOS
0.000.1722.27d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.001.3122.6622.6695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.050.910.9195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAABDMovement LOS
0.000.000.009.2014.7627.95d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.020.040.19V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-17
0.370Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
739691206979067Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
18517301742317Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
739691206979067Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
739691206979067Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-18
0.370Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.220.040.240.240.010.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-19
0.296Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
10.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
141046882104252512626506091Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
42617212666327131523Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
141046882104252512626506091Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
141046882104252512626506091Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-20
BIntersection LOS
10.22Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
10.3110.1510.0810.35Approach Delay [s/veh]
27.8530.8925.7430.2495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.111.241.031.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.270.300.260.29Degree of Utilization, x
678713685690Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-21
0.302Volume to Capacity (v/c):
FLevel Of Service:
65.9Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
5510011308242523Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
14250327666Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
5510011308242523Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
5510011308242523Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-22
FIntersection LOS
0.99d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAEApproach LOS
0.000.1945.10d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.002.8536.0436.0495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.111.441.4495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAABDFMovement LOS
0.000.000.0010.7025.9765.89d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.040.050.30V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-23
0.564Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
83473182110399159Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
20918462762540Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
83473182110399159Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
83473182110399159Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-24
0.564Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.250.040.380.380.020.09V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-25
0.507Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
11.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
3258784170148183558421065Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
815201018424614215316Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
3258784170148183558421065Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
3258784170148183558421065Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-26
BIntersection LOS
11.84Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
10.8410.0811.4413.20Approach Delay [s/veh]
26.9718.2542.1072.3495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.080.731.682.8995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.270.200.370.51Degree of Utilization, x
626633671708Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-27
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX C-III
EXISTING WITH PROJECT SIGNAL WARRANTS
C-28
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
1161524
1161523
2252222
2252221
3332920
7827319
7908018
1316414517
2328725416
2329526115
2329526114
2531928313
2835231212
2936932711
2936932710
313933489
394914368
415164577
445574946
496225525
526555814
617706823
627866972
658197261
NWE
Minor StreetsMajor StreetsHour
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
70%Warrant Factor
NoPopulation < 10,000
YesSpeed > 40mph
NMinor Approaches
E, WMajor Approaches
Intersection Warrants Parameters
NoPeak Hour#3
NoFour Hour Vehicular Volume#2
NoEight Hour Vehicular Volume#1
Met?NameWarrant
Warrants Summary
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-29
NoWarrant Met for Intersection
NoWarrant Met for Approach
YesTotal Volume Condition Met
3Number of Approaches on Intersection
1610Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour
NoHigh Minor Volume Condition Met
65Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour
NoDelay Condition Met
0:24VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm)
1Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach
22.3Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s)
NOrientation
Warrant 3 Condition A
0364300000Hours
Met
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1131524
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1131523
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2147522
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2147521
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo3162520
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo71155519
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo71170518
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo131309517
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo231541516
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo231556515
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo231556514
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo251602513
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo281664512
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo291696511
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo291696510
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo31174159
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo39192758
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo41197357
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo441105156
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo491117455
NoNoYesYesNoNoNoNoNoNo521123654
NoYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoNo611145253
NoYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoNo621148352
NoYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoNo651154551
Condition
B56%70%80%100%56%70%80%100%VolumeNumberVolumeNumber
Warrant 3Warrant 2Warrant 1 Condition BWarrant 1 Condition AMinor LanesMajor LanesHour
Warrant Analysis by Hour
Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-30
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
1272124
1272123
1403222
1403221
2534220
513310619
514711618
1026621117
1746637016
1748038015
1748038014
1951941213
2157345412
2259947511
2259947510
236395079
297996348
308396657
339067186
3610128035
3810668454
4512529933
46127910142
48133210561
NWE
Minor StreetsMajor StreetsHour
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
70%Warrant Factor
NoPopulation < 10,000
YesSpeed > 40mph
NMinor Approaches
E, WMajor Approaches
Intersection Warrants Parameters
NoPeak Hour#3
NoFour Hour Vehicular Volume#2
NoEight Hour Vehicular Volume#1
Met?NameWarrant
Warrants Summary
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-31
NoWarrant Met for Intersection
NoWarrant Met for Approach
YesTotal Volume Condition Met
3Number of Approaches on Intersection
2436Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour
NoHigh Minor Volume Condition Met
48Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour
NoDelay Condition Met
0:36VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm)
1Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach
45.1Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s)
NOrientation
Warrant 3 Condition A
0030000000Hours
Met
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1148524
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1148523
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1172522
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1172521
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2195520
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo51239519
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo51263518
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo101477517
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo171836516
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo171860515
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo171860514
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo191931513
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2111027512
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2211074511
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2211074510
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo231114659
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo291143358
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo301150457
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo331162456
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo361181555
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo381191154
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo451224553
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo461229352
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo481238851
Condition
B56%70%80%100%56%70%80%100%VolumeNumberVolumeNumber
Warrant 3Warrant 2Warrant 1 Condition BWarrant 1 Condition AMinor LanesMajor LanesHour
Warrant Analysis by Hour
Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-32
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX C-IV
YEAR 2021 WITHOUT PROJECT
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
C-33
0.197Volume to Capacity (v/c):
DLevel Of Service:
29.6Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
33723837152735Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
8181209479Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
33723837152735Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
33723837152735Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-34
DIntersection LOS
0.95d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AACApproach LOS
0.000.1623.33d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.001.3522.8922.8995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.050.920.9295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAACDMovement LOS
0.000.000.009.3115.1729.62d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.020.040.20V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-35
0.382Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
769721237249469Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
19218311812417Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
769721237249469Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
769721237249469Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-36
0.382Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.230.040.250.250.010.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-37
0.308Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
10.4Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
141077084107262613027526394Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
42718212777337131624Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
141077084107262613027526394Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
141077084107262613027526394Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-38
BIntersection LOS
10.44Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
10.5110.3710.2810.59Approach Delay [s/veh]
29.3632.6927.3332.4195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.171.311.091.3095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.290.310.270.31Degree of Utilization, x
670704677683Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-39
0.296Volume to Capacity (v/c):
FLevel Of Service:
69.7Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
4610431358192521Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
12261340565Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
4610431358192521Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
4610431358192521Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-40
FIntersection LOS
0.93d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAEApproach LOS
0.000.1546.16d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.002.3135.4135.4195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.091.421.4295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAABDFMovement LOS
0.000.000.0010.8326.3669.73d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.030.050.30V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-41
0.582Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
862761871145103162Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
21619472862641Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
862761871145103162Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
862761871145103162Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-42
0.582Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.250.040.390.390.020.10V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-43
0.527Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
12.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
3360804272148189578721567Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
815201118424714225417Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
3360804272148189578721567Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
3360804272148189578721567Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-44
BIntersection LOS
12.20Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
11.0610.2511.7613.71Approach Delay [s/veh]
28.5419.1244.9777.6495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.140.761.803.1195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.280.210.380.53Degree of Utilization, x
619624663701Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-45
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX C-V
YEAR 2021 WITH PROJECT
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
C-46
0.214Volume to Capacity (v/c):
DLevel Of Service:
30.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
34723837152938Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
91812094710Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
34723837152938Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
34723837152938Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-47
DIntersection LOS
1.04d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AACApproach LOS
0.000.1623.88d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.001.3525.3725.3795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.051.011.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAACDMovement LOS
0.000.000.009.3115.6830.14d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.020.050.21V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-48
0.383Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
770721247279469Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
19318311822417Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
770721247279469Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
770721247279469Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-49
0.383Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.230.040.250.250.010.04V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-50
0.308Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
10.4Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
141077084107262613127526394Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
42718212777337131624Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
141077084107262613127526394Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
141077084107262613127526394Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-51
BIntersection LOS
10.45Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
10.5210.3810.3010.59Approach Delay [s/veh]
29.3932.7227.5432.4395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.181.311.101.3095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.290.310.270.31Degree of Utilization, x
669704676682Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-52
0.351Volume to Capacity (v/c):
FLevel Of Service:
76.3Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoNoYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
5610431358252624Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
14261340676Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
5610431358252624Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
5610431358252624Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-53
FIntersection LOS
1.15d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAFApproach LOS
0.000.2052.84d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.000.000.003.0943.0843.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.000.000.000.121.721.7295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAABDFMovement LOS
0.000.000.0010.9431.1576.34d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.010.040.050.35V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-54
0.584Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
-Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
ICU 1Analysis Method:
SignalizedControl Type:
Intersection 2: Canal Street at Lincoln Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
NoYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
45.0045.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Intersection Setup
000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h]
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
871761871147103164Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
21819472872641Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
871761871147103164Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
871761871147103164Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Lincoln AveLincoln AveCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-55
0.584Intersection V/C
AIntersection LOS
0.260.040.390.390.020.10V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
-Lead---LeadLead / Lag
2,7Auxiliary Signal Groups
470825Signal group
PermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveOverlapSplitControl Type
Phasing & Timing
5.00Lost time [s]
100Cycle Length [s]
Intersection Settings
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-56
0.530Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
12.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
All-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 3: Canal Street at Heim Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesYesYesCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
3360804272148189578721767Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
815201118424714225417Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
3360804272148189578721767Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
3360804272148189578721767Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Heim AveHeim AveCanal StCanal StName
Volumes
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-57
BIntersection LOS
12.24Intersection Delay [s/veh]
BBBBApproach LOS
11.0810.2611.7713.78Approach Delay [s/veh]
28.5819.1545.0378.5095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
1.140.771.803.1495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0.280.210.380.53Degree of Utilization, x
617623663700Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-58
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1
Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Sub-Dividers.doc
APPENDIX C-VI
YEAR 2021 WITH PROJECT SIGNAL WARRANTS
C-59
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
1171524
1171523
2262322
2262321
3343020
7857619
7948318
1317015117
2329826516
2430727315
2430727314
2633229513
2936632612
3038334111
3038334110
324093639
405114548
425374777
465795156
516485755
546826064
638017123
648187272
678527571
NWE
Minor StreetsMajor StreetsHour
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
70%Warrant Factor
NoPopulation < 10,000
YesSpeed > 40mph
NMinor Approaches
E, WMajor Approaches
Intersection Warrants Parameters
NoPeak Hour#3
NoFour Hour Vehicular Volume#2
NoEight Hour Vehicular Volume#1
Met?NameWarrant
Warrants Summary
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-60
NoWarrant Met for Intersection
NoWarrant Met for Approach
YesTotal Volume Condition Met
3Number of Approaches on Intersection
1676Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour
NoHigh Minor Volume Condition Met
67Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour
NoDelay Condition Met
0:26VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm)
1Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach
23.9Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s)
NOrientation
Warrant 3 Condition A
0374300000Hours
Met
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1132524
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1132523
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2149522
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2149521
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo3164520
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo71161519
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo71177518
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo131321517
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo231563516
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo241580515
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo241580514
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo261627513
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo291692512
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo301724511
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo301724510
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo32177259
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo40196558
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo421101457
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo461109456
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo511122355
NoNoYesYesNoNoNoNoNoNo541128854
NoYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoNo631151353
NoYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoNo641154552
NoYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoNo671160951
Condition
B56%70%80%100%56%70%80%100%VolumeNumberVolumeNumber
Warrant 3Warrant 2Warrant 1 Condition BWarrant 1 Condition AMinor LanesMajor LanesHour
Warrant Analysis by Hour
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-61
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 1: Oceanview Avenue at Lincoln Avenue
1282224
1282223
2413322
2413321
2554420
513811019
615212118
1027722017
1848438516
1849839615
1849839614
2053942913
2259547312
2362249511
2362249510
246645289
308306598
328716927
349407476
3810518355
4011068794
47130010333
48132810552
50138310991
NWE
Minor StreetsMajor StreetsHour
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
70%Warrant Factor
NoPopulation < 10,000
YesSpeed > 40mph
NMinor Approaches
E, WMajor Approaches
Intersection Warrants Parameters
NoPeak Hour#3
NoFour Hour Vehicular Volume#2
NoEight Hour Vehicular Volume#1
Met?NameWarrant
Warrants Summary
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-62
NoWarrant Met for Intersection
NoWarrant Met for Approach
YesTotal Volume Condition Met
3Number of Approaches on Intersection
2532Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour
NoHigh Minor Volume Condition Met
50Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour
NoDelay Condition Met
0:44VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm)
1Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach
52.8Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s)
NOrientation
Warrant 3 Condition A
0030000000Hours
Met
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1150524
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo1150523
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2174522
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2174521
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2199520
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo51248519
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo61273518
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo101497517
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo181869516
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo181894515
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo181894514
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo201968513
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2211068512
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2311117511
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo2311117510
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo241119259
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo301148958
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo321156357
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo341168756
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo381188655
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo401198554
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo471233353
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo481238352
NoNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo501248251
Condition
B56%70%80%100%56%70%80%100%VolumeNumberVolumeNumber
Warrant 3Warrant 2Warrant 1 Condition BWarrant 1 Condition AMinor LanesMajor LanesHour
Warrant Analysis by Hour
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
C-63
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Dividers.doc
APPENDIX D
PROJECT DRIVEWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE
CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
D-1
0.008Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.1Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 4: Oceanview Avenue at Project Driveway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Project DrivewayOceanview AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
076201548Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
02160412Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
076201548Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
076201548Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Project DrivewayOceanview AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
D-2
AIntersection LOS
0.48d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
9.130.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.600.600.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.020.020.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
8.599.130.007.340.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.010.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
StopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
D-3
0.019Volume to Capacity (v/c):
ALevel Of Service:
9.2Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 4: Oceanview Avenue at Project Driveway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.00Grade [%]
25.0025.0025.00Speed [mph]
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft]
000000No. of Lanes in Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft]
RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement
Lane Configuration
WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Project DrivewayOceanview AveOceanview AveName
Intersection Setup
000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0174501865Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
04110516Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor
0174501865Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate
2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor
0174501865Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Project DrivewayOceanview AveOceanview AveName
Volumes
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
D-4
AIntersection LOS
1.08d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
AAAApproach LOS
9.190.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
1.481.480.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.060.060.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
AAAAAAMovement LOS
8.739.190.007.380.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.000.020.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
000Storage Area [veh]
NoFlared Lane
StopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
Version 6.00-02
Generated with
D-5
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3976-1
Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange
N:\3900\2183976 - Sunrise Assisted Living Project, Orange\Report\3976 Dividers.doc
APPENDIX E
PARKING SURVEY DATA FOR SIMILAR SITES
E-1
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 17, 2017
To: Jerry Liang, Sunrise Senior Living
From:
Subject: Supplemental Information Regarding Parking and TDM for the Sunrise
Redwood City Project
SJ16-1709
A new Sunrise Senior Living community with 90 units and 63 parking spaces (the Project) is
proposed for the site located at 2915 El Camino Real in unincorporated San Mateo County near the
border of the Town of Atherton and the City of Redwood City, California. This memorandum
provides information regarding employee shifts and visiting times, supplementary parking data,
and a preliminary Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan in response to San Mateo
County staff comments.
EMPLOYEE SHIFTS AND VISITING TIMES
There will be approximately 75 employees (in full time equivalents (FTEs)) at the site working in
three shifts. The shift times and approximate number of FTEs per shift are:
Morning shift (7 am to 3 pm) 45
Afternoon shift (3 pm to 11 pm) 20
Night shift (11 pm to 7 am) 10
Total 75
Visiting hours are between 9 am and 5 pm. The doors will be locked at 5 pm.
E-2
Jerry Liang
November 17, 2017
Page 2 of 8
PARKING INFORMATION
Published parking rates and the results of parking surveys conducted at two Sunrise communities
on the San Francisco Peninsula are discussed in this section.
PUBLISHED RATES
Parking rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation manual for
assisted living developments are presented in Table 1. Both the average and the 85th percentile of
the peak demand rates from the survey are included for information and comparison purposes. The
average rate is the average of the peak parking demand rates. The 85th percentile rate is the rate
where 85 percent of the surveyed peak parking rates are lower (and only 15 percent are higher).
These higher rates can be used to create conservative parking estimates.
TABLE 1: ITE PARKING GENERATION RATES
Land Use Rates (Spaces per unit)
Avg. 85th
Assisted Living 0.41 0.54
PARKING SURVEYS
Parking surveys were conducted at two similarly-sized Sunrise communities on the San Francisco
Peninsula: one is located in Palo Alto and the other in Belmont. These Sunrise communities also
have similar employee ratios as the proposed Project.
E-3
Jerry Liang
November 17, 2017
Page 3 of 8
Palo Alto Site
The Palo Alto site is located at 2701 El Camino Real. The facility has 81 units accommodating up to
97 residents. At the time of the survey 75 of the units were occupied with 89 residents, representing
an occupancy of 93 percent. There were 30 employees during the morning and afternoon shifts,
and 10 on the night shift. The site has 44 total parking spaces including 2 handicapped spaces, 1
Sunrise vehicle space, 2 resident spaces, 1 future resident space, and 7 visitor spaces. Vehicle access
is provided via two driveways (one inbound and one outbound) on Sheridan Avenue.
E-4
Jerry Liang
November 17, 2017
Page 4 of 8
Belmont Site
The Belmont site is located at 1010 Alameda de las Pulgas. The facility has 78 units accommodating
up to 89 residents. At the time of the survey 71 of the units were occupied with 82 residents,
representing an occupancy of 92 percent. There were 27 employees during the morning shift, 24
on the afternoon shift, and 5 on the night shift. The site has 25 total parking spaces including 2
handicapped spaces, 1 Sunrise vehicle space, 2 resident spaces, and 1 reserved for the team
member of the month. Sunrise also has 15 spaces on the adjacent church property. Vehicle access
is provided via two driveways; one on Ralston Avenue that it gated and rarely used, and one off of
the adjacent church and school parking lot.
Parking Survey Results
The parking surveys were conducted by counting the number of parked vehicles in hourly
increments. Survey days were selected with input from Sunrise staff to capture the days with the
highest parking demands. The surveys were conducted from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm on Tuesday,
December 13 and Wednesday, December 14, 2016. Supplemental surveys were conducted in
January 2017. The peak parking times occurred at 12:00 noon and 1:00 pm. The survey results and
resulting peak parking demand rates are presented in Table 2. The parking data is attached.
E-5
Jerry Liang
November 17, 2017
Page 5 of 8
TABLE 2: PARKING SURVEY RESULTS AND RATES
Item Value
Sunrise Palo Alto
Survey Results (highest number of parked vehicles) 36
Rates (per Unit) 0.44
Rates (per Occ. Unit) 0.48
Sunrise Belmont
Survey Results (highest number of parked vehicles) 26
Rates (per Unit) 0.33
Rates (per Occ. Unit) 0.37
The results of the survey from the Palo Alto site are very similar to the ITE average parking
demand rate.
Conclusions
The proposed parking supply of 63 spaces is lower than the County’s requirement for “Other
Compatible Uses” which is 1 space per 1,000 square feet or 81 spaces. However, this requirement
is not specific to assisted living communities. The proposed parking supply rate of 0.70 spaces per
unit is higher than the ITE and surveyed parking demand rates for assisted living communities.
Therefore the proposed parking supply will be sufficient to accommodate the Project’s parking
without encroachment into the adjacent neighborhood.
PRELIMINARY TDM PLAN
The primary purpose of any TDM plan is to reduce the amount of vehicle traffic and parking
generated by a development by creating measures, strategies, incentives, and policies to shift
people (primarily employees) from driving alone to using other travel modes including transit,
carpooling, cycling, and walking. TDM strategies include physical site amenities, informational
resources, monetary incentives, management strategies and more. First transit service near the site
is described to provide information regarding potential transit use for employees. Then measures
to be provided by Sunrise at the Project site are described.
NEARBY TRANSIT SERVICE
One way to reduce project generated traffic and parking is to encourage staff to travel by transit.
The Project site is served by one non-school SamTrans bus route, Route ECR (El Camino Real
E-6
Jerry Liang
November 17, 2017
Page 6 of 8
between Daly City BART and the Palo Alto Transit Center). Route ECR operates from approximately
4:00 am to 2:00 am on weekdays with service every 15 minutes during peak commute hours and
30 minutes at other times of the day. On Saturdays and Sundays, the route operates between
approximately 5:00 am and 2:00 am with service every 20 to 30 minutes. The closest bus stops for
Route ECR are located on El Camino Real at Dumbarton Avenue in the northbound direction and
at 5th Avenue in the southbound direction. These stops are approximately 1,000 feet (less than a ¼
mile) from the site.
SamTrans has long range plans to add bus rapid transit (BRT) on El Camino Real which will increase
bus service frequency and capacity.
TDM MEASURES
Sunrise will be providing the following TDM measures at the Project site:
Bicycle parking
Showers and changing facilities
Transportation Coordinator
Commuter assistance center
New employee TDM packet
TDM marketing
Carpool matching service
If additional measures are needed to manage the parking demand, these measures will be
considered:
Subsidized transit passes
Guaranteed ride home program
Bicycle Parking
Safe, secure, and easily accessible bicycle parking facilities support bicycling as a mode choice. A
bicycle storage room will be located in the parking garage so employees can safely store their
bicycles. Bike racks will be located along the El Camino Real frontage and can be used by visitors.
E-7
Jerry Liang
November 17, 2017
Page 7 of 8
Showers and Changing Facilities
Showers and changing facilities will be provided for use by employees to encourage commuting by
bicycle.
Transportation Coordinator
A staff member will be designated as the Transportation Coordinators who will be responsible for
developing, marketing, and implementing the TDM program. Having dedicated personnel on staff
helps to make the TDM program more robust, consistent and reliable.
Commuter Assistance Center
The Commuter Assistance Center is an on-site, one-stop shop for transit and commute alternatives
information and provides education and support for easy use of alternative modes.
New Employee TDM Packet
Each new employee will be provided with a TDM packet explain all transportation options.
Introducing new employees to the TDM program creates an awareness and culture of drive -alone
alternatives prior to establishing their commute behavior.
TDM Marketing
The Transportation Coordinator will create a TDM marketing program. Messaging keeps TDM
options in front of employees on a regular basis and reminds people to think about alternative
modes.
Carpool Matching
Carpool programs help carpools to form by matching drivers and passengers.
Subsidized Transit Passes
Sunrise may elect to subsidize transit passes for employees through programs such as Commuter
Check or by purchasing Caltrain or SamTrans passes to provide a financial incentive for employees
to use transit.
E-8
Jerry Liang
November 17, 2017
Page 8 of 8
Guaranteed Ride Home
Employees who use transit or carpools would be guaranteed a ride home in case of emergency or
if they need to work late which helps to reduce concerns about using alternative modes.
E-9
Sunrise of Palo Alto Parking Surveys
12/13/2016 On-Street Total
Guest Driveway Handicap Total Occ.
Spaces 42 N/A 2 44
9:00 No Access 0 No Access
10:00 24 1 1 26 59%4 30
11:00 24 1 1 26 59%4 30
12:00 30 1 1 32 73%4 36
13:00 26 0 2 28 64%4 32
14:00 27 1 0 28 64%4 32
15:00 24 1 0 25 57%4 29
16:00 24 3 1 28 64%4 32
12/14/2016 On-Street Total
Guest Driveway Handicap Total Occ.
Spaces 42 2 44
9:00 18 3 1 22 50%4 26
10:00 25 1 1 27 61%4 31
11:00 21 1 2 24 55%4 28
12:00 23 1 2 26 59%4 30
13:00 29 0 2 31 70%4 35
14:00 25 1 1 27 61%4 31
15:00 23 1 1 25 57%4 29
16:00 26 1 1 28 64%4 32
On-Street = estimate from January observations
On-site
On-site
E-10
Sunrise of Belmont Parking Surveys
12/13/2016 Adj Lot Total
Guest Driveway Handicap Reserved Total Occu.
Spaces 19 0 4 2 25
9:00 15 0 1 1 17 68%1 18
10:00 16 0 1 1 18 72%1 19
11:00 17 0 2 2 21 84%1 22
12:00 19 0 2 2 23 92%1 24
13:00 14 2 2 2 20 80%1 21
14:00 17 1 3 2 23 92%1 24
15:00 15 1 1 2 19 76%1 20
16:00 13 0 1 2 16 64%1 17
12/14/2016 Adj Lot Total
Guest Driveway Handicap Reserved Total Occu.
Spaces 19 0 4 2 25
9:00 16 0 2 2 20 80%1 21
10:00 18 0 2 2 22 88%1 23
11:00 18 2 2 2 24 96%1 25
12:00 19 2 2 2 25 100%1 26
13:00 18 0 2 2 22 88%1 23
14:00 18 1 2 2 23 92%1 24
15:00 16 1 2 2 21 84%1 22
16:00 18 1 2 2 23 92%1 24
Adj Lot = estimate from January observations
On-Site
On-Site
E-11