Loading...
02-11-2015 - Minutes TCCITY OF ORANGE CITY TRAFFIC COMMISSION Minutes Of a Regular Meeting: February 11, 2015 I. OPENING A. Flag Pledge B. Roll Call Present - Commissioners: J. Beil, E. Glasgow, C. Vaughan Absent - Commissioners: M. Lebeau Present - Staff: M. Llanes, D. Hoard, D. Allenbach, Sgt. J. Bird, P. Then C. Approval of Minutes November 12, 2014 - Approved as published by the Recording Secretary. MOTION: Glasgow SECOND: Vaughan AYES: Unanimous NOES: None ABSTAIN: None December 10, 2014 - Approved as published by the Recording Secretary. MOTION: Beil SECOND: Vaughan AYES: Unanimous NOES: None ABSTAIN: None II. ORAL PRESENTATIONS None this month. III. CONSENT CALENDAR None this month. Chyof A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. r ang e Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public W orks Departm 2!7 February [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes] � Printed On Recycled Paper Page 12 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 IV. CONSIDERATION ITEMS 1. Request for the installation of an All -Way STOP control at the intersection of Trenton Ave. and Baxter St. Andrea Burtram 1126 E. Trenton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 Oral presentation is based on the written staff report; please refer to your copy. Chairman Beil opened the public hearing for the following discussion. Andrea Burtram, 1126 E. Trenton Ave - Trenton is a long and uncontrolled street. There are over 200 units at the mobile park. I know there haven't been any accidents and the volume on and off Baxter St. is not as high but people go over 60 mph up and down Trenton. There have been requests for speed humps and a traffic signal at Cambridge and Trenton. The reason I requested the STOP sign is to control speed and to help control the traffic, more so on Trenton rather than Baxter. I don't know if there are other suggestions that could help with this but for safety of the residents, and there are a lot of ambulances and small buses that go back and forth to the mobile home park also, if there would be a way to control some of the speeds of the traffic on Trenton. I think this would help with controlling that but not be as extreme as putting speed humps on the street. Chairman Beil closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for further discussion and a motion. Chairman Beil - Have we received any additional communication on this item? Vice Chairman Vaughan — I wonder if we could have some comments from our Police Dept. concerning Ms. Burtram's comments regarding speeds of up to 60 mph on that street, and a lot of through traffic because of the mobile home park. Can you contribute to that? Sgt. Jeff Bird, OPD Traffic Bureau — This is the only access the mobile home park has. There is speed there at times, we have put our speed trailer out to let motorists know how fast they are going. There are times the vehicles are going well beyond the, posted speed limit and we have been able to issue citations. We would be happy to go out with the speed trailer again for about 6 weeks. It's been determined that after 6 weeks people start to return to their normal driving behavior. I have an idea to go to Crime Prevention to get them to go out to the mobile home park and get them aware of the fact that when they are traveling on Trenton they are not on a thoroughfare, they are actually on a residential street that might help for a while. �j �Cityof A digital recording of this City Tragic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. V Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public Works Departmen L February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper Page 13 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 Chairman Beil — We have a lot of STOP sign requests come in for 2 -Way and All -Way STOP's at a lot of residential intersections. The basic premise of this request is to control speed and previously we have had a number of issues come through the Commission regarding speed on Trenton, options that were considered at the time were the speed hump program, or traffic calming device putting it in the street, however, Trenton doesn't have the volumes now to justify the speed hump program. We most recently had the issue of a request for a STOP control or a signal at Trenton and Cambridge, we denied that. The basic fact of the matter is that STOP signs aren't for controlling speed necessarily, they are for controlling right -of -way, or controlling conflicts in the right -of -way on movements at intersections and turns. I like to stick pretty closely to warrants that justify that otherwise there is no rhyme or reason for putting in STOP signs at a lot of our residential intersections. In fact STOP signs can actually increase accident rates at some intersections with confusion of right -of -way, rear -end collisions depending on the volumes and speeds. Vice Chairman Vaughan — I'd just like to 'add that I'm encouraged by what Sgt. Bird had to say and maybe we could approach it that way and see if has a positive effect and what the outcome is. Commissioner Glasgow — You can probably tell if it's the same people doing it over and over again, it probably is. If you know which neighbor it is you might have a discussion with them. If they're in the trailer park, there is a Manager of the trailer park, have them set something up that says, "You're on a residential street and its 25 mph." He's right STOP signs aren't to control speed and we have a couple of letters from residents of Trenton Ave. that are opposed to it also, it also causes wear and tear on your vehicles from starting and stopping, there are other issues that go along with that. Chairman Beil — We have received letters, from people who live right by where a STOP sign would go and they are very opposed to putting STOP signs in for numerous reasons, one of them being noise of vehicles stopping and starting from a STOP. ACTION: Denied the request. The Commission directed the Police Dept. to take the speed trailer out to Trenton Ave. for a time, to talk to the mobile home park manager about 25 MPH on Trenton Ave., and speed control enforcement for a few weeks. MOTION: Beil SECOND: Glasgow AYES: Unanimous NOES: None ABSTAIN: None V l Ci ty of p A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. )ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public Works Departmen E:7 February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper Page 1 4 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11; 2015 2. Request for the installation of an "All -Way" STOP control at the intersection of Larkstone Dr. and Laurinda Ln. Deborah Mongan 984 N. Ridgeline Rd. Orange CA 92869 Oral presentation is based on the written staff report; please refer to your copy. Chairman Beil opened the public hearing for the following discussion. Vice Chairman Vaughan - Has there been any verification of the increased use by the parents as a drop -off zone? Chairman Beil — Do we have any counts by staff of what you see as the number of people getting dropped -off in the residential area there? Dave Allenbach; Transportation Analyst — Pretty much all of the vehicles that entered in the morning were parents dropping their children off at school. We have some pedestrians that use the crosswalk; some parents will actually stop on the east side of the intersection on Larkstone and walk their children across Laurinda and into the school. Everything appears to be very orderly and because the traffic volumes are fairly light at this intersection there are plenty gaps in traffic. Nobody had to make any invasive maneuvers. We may see more children being dropped off back here to relieve the pressure of the drop -off at the front of the school. We would have no counts or a need to know if it's increasing or decreasing, it's just that it's an easy access back here and depending on where you live this may be the easiest way to drop your children off. Vice Chairman Vaughan — Has the school contacted us with an opinion? Were they contacted in response to the request? Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - The school is within the 300 ft. radius notification area so they were notified, we did not receive any response from them. Also the field is used in the afternoon for soccer, on the afternoon we conducted our study there were some children playing, cars were parked on the street, but again this was not causing any sight distance issues. The only thing may be a little bit of a concern as you can see in this photograph, this vehicle is parked and on one occasion we did see the south side of Larkstone a vehicle parked right up to the crosswalk. Chairman Beil So we don't know the school or the school district's policy on their gate use - exiting at the back of the field? I City of ran ge Public Works Departmen A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. k� February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper Page 15 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst — No we were out there several times and the gate is closed while school is in session. It's open early in the morning and once school starts the gate is closed until the afternoon and then the gate is opened again. I'm not sure if it's locked. The day we were conducting our turn count they were having soccer practice and the gate was open. It could be that the soccer league has keys to the locks so they can get in without having to go around to LaVeta. Chairman Beil - We dealt with this back gate access at other school areas previously through different requests presented to the Commission and I remember discussions about the blanket policy on some of those other schools that the school does not condone the use of those back gates and that became an issue not only for after school hours. For after school hours activities the organizations have to be issued a key and have agreements with the school and the district. I'm curious if we have asked the school district if they have a formal policy on use of that back gate access both before and after school, and completely after hours for other organizations. Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst — The school and the district received notification of the meeting, but we did not contact them personally. We focused on the intersection and the usage here, the fact that we did a 3rd turn count in the afternoon was simply because it's our policy when we get a request like this. When that intersection is close to a public school, even if there were no back access here it would be a driving route to get the children to the front of the school, so we would do an additional turn count in the afternoon. As you can see from the volumes the PM peak is lower than both the AM and PM so school peaks don't always coincide with traffic volume peaks. Debbie Mongam, 984 N. Ridgeline Rd . - I wrote the letter, I do not live in the neighborhood but I have had a daughter at that school for 3 years and I've sat and watched this intersection and wondered why it wasn't a 4 -Way STOP. I understand that it doesn't meet your objective criteria but it has to have some subjective component here. LaVeta Elementary has almost 900 kids and we have been asked as parents of older kids and kids in the classrooms towards the back of the school to use the back gate for ingress /egress. The front of the school is incredibly congested, it backs up onto LaVeta and so it's ridiculous in drop -off. They have tried splitting starting and dismissal times in an attempt to alleviate it, it's still a problem on LaVeta. There is no bussing in this school district to speak of, so everybody drives their kids. This school houses the Gate program so kids that come from other schools all over the district come here for Gate, so those parents are driving to 2 -3 other schools sometimes and then also coming here to bring their kids to this school so there are multiple trips and they are unavoidable. They're acting as if it can be alleviated by the kids walking. At a minimum there should be striping here; these are main access crosswalks that are used by kids coming to and from school. It's a school zone and I can't understand why there's no crosswalk perpendicular to the intersection here. The sight lines are terrible because parents park on the corner not just adjacent to the corner but I City ofp A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. ran ge Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public Works Departmen 2!7 February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks /Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper Page 16 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 actually on the curb. Red curbs would be fabulous as a minimum. The congestion is terrible for these couple of times during the day, and I understand that it's probably not all day long and if you see it at 5 PM it's totally different than 8:30 a.m. and at 3:30 p.m. Everyone I spoken to, the principal, teachers, parents and residents are in favor of a 4 -Way STOP here. I have not met anyone who has come up to me and said it was a bad idea. I wasn't even aware that they hold games and practices there one of the parents who have a kid that does soccer says it is terrible during that time too. Kids are trying to walk to cars or meet up with parents; it is an accident waiting to happen. I go through I don't know how many STOP's during my day, I would happily stop one more time at this intersection if it would save a kid from getting hit. I understand your criteria, I appreciate you're coming out to look at the intersection, but I urge you to consider that there are some subjective concerns related to the school zone and the kids in the neighborhood that override any body of objective criteria that it doesn't meet. Please consider this for a 4 -Way painted STOP with signage on all corners. . Gene Segrist, 2929 Garzes Ln . — I agree with everything the previous speaker said, it's a very dangerous thing, I can't tell you how many times I've had to slow down, swerve, come to a full stop while cars pull out from Larkstone going across. As far as the soccer that is a huge issue. Many times there are cars parked a block away and walking to the fields. I urge you to really consider this because there is going to be an accident. I have lived in this area for 38 years so it's just a matter of common sense to go ahead and put that STOP in, based on location and everything that goes on. Chairman Beil closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for further discussion and a motion. Vice Chairman Vaughan - I used to live very close here, in fact within walking distance so I am familiar with the area. Based on what I hear from local resident and the concerns from the parent, it concerns me that the school hasn't been a part of this conversation. I'd be interested to know, more to your point, whether or not they are telling parents to use that in -field as a drop -off zone because it cause issues within the neighborhood. At the very least I think they are an important part of the conversation and if the school is going to continue to support that I feel we should support some type of progressive action to account for the activity and I think it's worth looking into. I am in favor of putting this aside and having staff contact the school to find out their specific position on these issues and whether or not they are telling parents to go out and park there, and this issue of the soccer and whether or not that is a permitted function and maybe look, at the very least; of going with red curbs and a crosswalk. It troubles me that the school wasn't made a collaborative part of this conversation I think it's worth talking with them. g City of ran ge Public Works Department A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. 0 February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper Page 17 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 Commissioner Beil — Maybe someone from Public Works in the Traffic side can reach out and try to arrange a meeting with the Principal, Vice Principal or whoever at the school to talk about what is happening in the neighborhood. Commissioner Glasgow — I was there this morning about 8:10 to 8:20 and one thing that did concern me was that there is only one set of crosswalks and that is on the Larkstone side facing Laurinda. Maybe we could consider installing crosswalks at the other 3 legs of the intersection. There were only 3 -4 cars that came through while I was there and 1 bicyclist that used the gate in the back. Chairman Beil I have mixed feelings on the crosswalks; to me they are almost an attractive nuisance to give a false sense of security. I know we have to have them in certain places because of pedestrian counts but I think crosswalks unless they are appropriately justified are a nuisance. Most of the conventional State highways has gone through an extensive program of actually removing crosswalks particularly along Pacific Coast Highway because of the amount of fatal accidents and injuries that have happened in those crosswalks. People tend to use the yellow painted crosswalks, particularly in school zones, as golden walls that protect you, and they don't protect you. If we want to modify or to request red curb, would that have to come back and mean a re- notification because it's a different action? Dave Allenbach — It would. Also in concern with the crosswalks it has long been our policy not to install crosswalks without some type of positive traffic control i.e., STOP sign or traffic signal. A crosswalk is not a safety device; it is a channelization device and is an extension of sidewalk to get a pedestrian from one side of the street to the other at a logical crossing point, which in this case would be an intersection. Additional red curb would keep people from parking around the curb returns. In the morning we had a total of 3 children crossing here on the south leg on the way to school, and about 3 -4 in the morning using the crosswalk on the west side of the street. We had a similar number of kids on the south side of the intersection in the afternoon; however, we had more kids using the crosswalk in the afternoon. That's not unusual, most parents are available to drop their kids off in the morning but school gets out before we get out of work. ACTION: Continued this for 2 months and have staff meet with the school to find out what they are doing in regard to the back gate usage; look at a proposal for standardized red curb for the vision zone at the 3 existing STOP signs for consideration. "b City of ran ge Public Works Departmen A digital recording of this City Tragic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard; advance notice is appreciated. Et7 February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks /Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes 0 Printed On Recycled Paper Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission MOTION: Beil SECOND: Glasgow AYES: Unanimous NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Page 18 .tary 11, 2015 Note from Recording Secretary — Whenever a public school is either the applicant, or the campus lies within 300 ft. of the affected area, we send notification to the school principal, and also to the Facilities Director of Orange Unified School District. This is a policy determined by the Traffic Engineer to solicit their participation in the discussion and decision making process. If the affected campus is a private school we focus our notification effort to that school's princip 3. A review of red curb markings on Cambridge St. between Adams Ave. and Collins Ave. to determine if the amount of red curb markings can be reduced to provide additional on- street parking. Traffic Engineering Division Public Works Department CITY OF ORANGE Commissioner Glasgow - Aren't there also parking restrictions in the morning and afternoon on Cambridge St. in that area for the bike lane? Dave A1lenbach, Transportation Analyst — Parking is prohibited from 7 AM to 9 AM during school days and between 2 PM and 4 PM on school days. Weekend parking is unrestricted except for areas that are painted red. Oral presentation is based on the written staff report, please refer to your copy. Chairman Beil opened the public hearing for the following discussion. Anne Gallegos, 944 N. Cambridge St . — Opposed to reduction. We live directly across the street from Yorba Middle School, there is a parking lot directly across from our house that much of the time is full when students are coming or leaving. However there is a parking lot on Collins Ave. adjacent to the gymnasium where students don't have to cross the street to get into cars when their parents pick them up, they do walk across the street all up and down the block, not at crosswalks. I am so surprised that there hasn't been a severe accident there; I have seen so many near - misses. We do have red in front of our house; we had to do that after living there for several years because people would park in our driveway, across our driveway and my husband has been bumped by a car when trying to pull out of the driveway because we couldn't see around the cars that were already parked there. I'm so j V ' City A digital recording of this City Tragic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. ran ge Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public Works Departmen E�7 February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks /Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper Page 19 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 afraid that something is going to happen either to us or mostly to the kids walking across the street; they don't go to the crosswalk at Collins, they don't go to the crosswalk at Adams, but they dart across the street at all times even when the traffic is not moving at the posted 25 mph along that street. We've had a crash in our front yard and I just think that arrangements could be made for the parents to pick up their children at the other parking lot where they wouldn't have to cross the street at all. I know a lot of people don't drive 25 mph and when we try to drive at 25 mph people pass us. I urge you please don't remove much of the red along that street, there are other options available to them. Chairman Bed — I'd like to remind everybody that this was actually a request related to a request to install additional red curb which the Commission approved, but we directed staff to go back and look at what could be removed. I think staff did a great job on the northbound side of Cambridge which is the east side of the street. How many more stalls were added there? Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst — We estimate that we added at least 6 more parking spaces on the east side of the street which is adjacent to the school and that way people don't have to cross the street to get access to the athletic field. Chairman Beil — The issue that was driving this was not so much the children going to and from school it was the weekend and after school parking in the area due to the school facilities being used for soccer. I drive by there all the time so I know what it's like on weekends. We're trying to create as many spaces as we could create for parking to try to keep those vehicles from spilling out further into the adjacent neighborhoods. Staff's analysis of what they could possibly create is just 3 additional spaces and so that is what we are trying to determine if it is worth it or not. Rick Manzano, 1042 N. Cambridge St . — The issue of the red curb is not people parking in front of my house because there are 2 spaces in front of my house. There is a small red curb installed to keep people from blocking the driveway but understand that on the weekends when there is soccer, but my south driveway, we installed a circular driveway back in the Little League days that driveway is absolutely useless on the weekends, I cannot go in and out. _I have a slope where we come up, it's about from the ground to about where you are sitting (dais) so as we come out of the driveway even a small car will completely block the street as opposed to if we were all at the same level. Line of sight is extremely important. My north driveway I can use with a very small margin of safety because of the speeds. Coming down Cambridge St. its 35 mph until you hit Katella then it becomes 25 mph. Going north people tend to drive a little slower because it's 25 mph all the way up and that's the part that has created the problem on our side of the street, it's the southbound cars. I looked it up, at 35 mph they have about 2 seconds for the line of sight that we have right now. If you reduce it down to about 25 ft. visibility that means somebody has less than 1 second of time to react to me pulling out of the driveway. I can't see them until the ' City of A digital recording of this City Tragic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. V ran g e Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public Works Departmen E February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks /Traffic /CTC /2015 N Enutes 1 0 , Printed On Recycled Paper P a g e 110 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 nose of my truck is at least 2 ft. into the traffic lane. Most people that park on the street pull one wheel up onto the curb and they pull in the mirrors on their vehicles. Really you shouldn't have any parking on that street, it is a bike lane that is very heavily used all the time so, in my opinion, the whole side should be no parking for that reason. I have a trailer and when I hook that up to my truck I'm over 50 ft. long and I need the zone just to pull into the driveway. I ask you to deny any request for additional red curb removal. I'm more concerned with the southbound traffic when parents for some reason when they are going to school or soccer practice they throw safety out the window completely and they are worried about time and it's really amazing when they just stop in the middle of the street and have their kids jump out of the car. Lynn Manzano, 1042 N. Cambridge St . — Our home was originally built in 1937 with open space all around, in 1954 a second family home was built next door. In 1957 I watched Yorba Middle School being built, and in 1959 I watched California Elementary School being built. Due to traffic we eventually built a U- shaped driveway in our front yard in order to exit safely. Signals were installed at the intersections of Katella and Collins at Cambridge, this increased traffic is due to easy access to the signals. If you try to exit our driveway at 7:45 a.m. and 5:15 p.m. there is a train of cars. Nightly soccer practice began at Yorba and California; weekends became filled with soccer practice, games or tournaments. We requested the red curb in order to provide safe sight of oncoming traffic and create a safety zone for exiting the driveways. During practices, games, open houses, performances and more events we have constant parked cars on both sides of the street and sides of the driveway making entering and exiting a challenge. Frequently we experience cars parked blocking our driveway in addition to cars using our driveway without remorse. One parking incident the driver responded to our request to move their car with, "You have another driveway." They don't think. The problem is increased over - scheduling of the fields at the schools, at times weekend tournaments are scheduled up to 8 fields from 8 am to 6 pm which translates to the possibility of 320 people arriving per hour. We're okay with having soccer across the street but we want reasonability. The 3 parking spaces in front of our homes will not solve the parking problem, the existing red curb does solve the problem of us not getting hit when trying to enter and exit. Parents are focused on getting in and out and getting to their next commitment not on watching for our cars. I suggest opening the faculty parking lot at Yorba which would add up to 15 spaces instead of our 3. 1 ask you to maintain the existing red zones. Vice Chairman Vaughan — Are the faculty lots open for soccer? Commissioner Glasgow — I've not seen it open before. Scott Malmgrun, 1064 N. Cambridge St . — I'd like to argue for the retention of the red zones as they exist now. The addition of more parking just creates visual congestion for both the driver and pedestrian crossing the street at the time of the athletic events causing further issues. g Cityof A digital recording of this City Tragic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. ran ge Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public Woks Departmen d February 2015 (N:/PublicWorks /Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper P a g e 111 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 Chairman Beil closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for further discussion and a motion. Chairman Beil — I think the 1064 and 1042 area, it's pretty clear, there was just 2 spots in front of 1064 that could be considered for clearing, the third spot is up on the corner house at Adams and Cambridge. Did we have any input for 1102 Cambridge as what their preference was? Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst We have not received any telephone or written communication from them, they were notified. When we were discussing the issue of red curb at Adams and Cambridge last October they were notified of that meeting but they did not attend that meeting either. Chairman Beil — Maybe just to recap the results, what did the Commission approve and what was the Council action on it? Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst — I believe the request for red curb at that intersection was denied. The proponent appealed to the City Council, that was also denied, however the resident at the northwest corner of Adams at Cambridge had several palm trees growing behind his front fence but hanging into the public right -of -way and obstructing sight distance, they were asked to trim them down and they have been cut back pretty well. Chairman Beil — With the input from the residents I think staff did a good job. I think our focus was the east side of Cambridge (northbound) and you accomplished that and brought back what options we have on the southbound side of Cambridge. I would not be supportive of removing additional red curb. Vice Chairman Vaughan — I'd also like to leave the red curb where it is. Commissioner Glasgow — I live further south on Cambridge St. and I put in a circular driveway just for that reason. It's not easy backing out in the morning or early evenings. ACTION: Denied removal of any red curb from the west side of Cambridge St. between Collins Ave. and Adams Ave. MOTION: Glasgow SECOND: Vaughan AYES: Unanimous NOES: None ABSTAIN: None End of Consideration Items City of A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. ran ge Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. Public Works Departmeni : Et7 February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper P a e 112 Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission February 11, 2015 V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Chairman Beil inquired as to the status of Council's recruitment to fill the vacancy of an additional Traffic Commissioner. Because we have issues with the school district coming up, I remember reading that one of the requirements for the Council to consider when making an appointment is that one member is affiliated with the school district. Has that been requirement been eliminated? Denah Hoard, Asst. City Attorney - There has been no movement. You are correct, we're looking into that. Chairman Beil - It's been a long running issue and I've wondered even when we had a fully appointed Commission as to that requirement. I'm hoping you are looking at that while considering the new appointment. VI. ADJOURNMENT After discussion of today's Agenda the City Traffic Commission meeting was concluded, and as there were no further requests for action under Oral Presentations, the Chairman adjourned this session of the City Traffic Commission. The next meeting of the City Traffic Commission is scheduled: 5:30 P.M. Wednesday - March 11 2015 Respectfully submitted, Phyllis Then, Recording Secretary Traffic Engineering Division 12then @cityoforange.org CITY OF ORANGE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 300 E CHAPMAN AVENUE ORANGE CA 92866 PH: (714) 744 -5536 FAX: (714) 744 -5573 < City of A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase. J Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. .Public Works Departmen E�7 February 2015 [N:/PublicWorks /Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes a Printed On Recycled Paper