SR - AGR-6328 - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES SANTIAGO HILLS II G����°��c� AGENDA ITEM
*: �.*
o: ��
���� ��� March 8, 2016
�s�'"���iy
rnvric
ReviewedNerified B •
TO: Honorable Ma or and City Manager
Y Finance Directo► irJi�.
Members of the City Council To Be Presented By: Jennifer Le
THRU: Rick Otto X Cons Calendar City Mgr Rpts
City Manager Council Reports _ Legal Affairs
� Boards/Cmtes Public Hrgs
FROM: William Crouch —
Community Development Director Admin Reports Plan/Environ
1. SUBJECT
Professional Services Agreement for environmental review for the Santiago Hills II Project.
2. SUMMARY
Professional Services Agreement between the City of Orange and ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. for
environmental review services related to the Santiago Hills II Project.
3. RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the Professional Services Agreement with ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc.; and
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the Agreement with ICF Jones
& Stokes, Inc.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
The contract's not-to-exceed amount is $50,000. The contract will not have a direct fiscal impact
to the City as entitlement processing costs for the Santiago Hills II project are funded by the project
Applicant.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S)
3. Enhance and promote quality of life in the community
6. GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
General Plan Implementation Program III-1 - Compliance with all provisions of CEQA.
ITEM ��� 1 3/8/1G
7. DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
On November 8,2005,the Orange City Council approved the Santiago Hills II(SHII)/East Orange
development project. The 2005 approvals allowed for residential development along Santiago
Canyon Road between Jamboree Road and Irvine Lake and included certification of an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
compliance purposes. Tentative Tract Maps were approved allowing for 3,820 residential units in
SHII and East Orange. Of those units, 1,596 units were located in SHII.
Following the 2005 approvals, the property owner cleared the site, but chose not to move forward
with development at that time. In late 2014,the property owner dedicated most of the land east of
the SR 241/261 to the County of Orange as permanent open space (including the East Orange
portion of the approved project), leaving only the SHII area available for development.
On December 1, 2015, the property owner (The Irvine Company) submitted applications to the
City to modify their previous SHII project approvals. The modifications would reduce the
development acreage and number of residential units within SHII from the previously-approved
1,596 units on 496 acres to 1,180 units on 417 acres. The applications are currently being reviewed
by City staff and include Tentative Tract Maps for SHII, amended Design Guidelines,an amended
Runoff Management Plan, and an amended Development Agreement. In addition, CEQA
compliance is required.
To assist with CEQA compliance documents, staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for
environmental consulting services. The RFP was sent to four firms and the City received two
proposals. An interdepartmental Consultant Selection Committee reviewed the proposals and
recommended ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. as the successful proposer. ICF is being recommended
based on their qualifications including the strength of their project manager and ICF's previous
knowledge and experience with the SHII/EOPC project as the preparer of the 2005 certified EIR.
In addition, ICF was the lowest bidder.
Under the Agreement, ICF will perform a third-party review of certain Applicant-submitted
technical studies and will prepare CEQA compliance documentation for the SHII project. The cost
is $39,350 plus a�25% contingency for a not-to-exceed cost of$50,000.
8. ATTACHMENTS
Attachments to Re,port:
1. Professional Services Agreement
ITEM 2 3/8/16
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made at
Orange, California, as of , 2016 (herein referred to as the "Effective Date")
by and among the CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation ("City") and ICF JONES &
STOKES, INC., a California corporation (the "Contractor"), with its principal office for purposes
of this Agreement at. 1 Ada Parkway, Suite 100, in the City of Irvine, State of California, with
reference to the following:
1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement,
Contractor shall provide to the reasonable satisfaction of City, the services set forth in Exhibits
"A" and "B", which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. All services
provided shall conform to all federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations and to the best
and highest professional standards and practices. The terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement and Exhibit "A" shall control over any terms and conditions in Exhibit "B" to the
contrary.
2. Compensation and Fees.
a. Contractor's total compensation for all services performed under this
Agreement, including a twenty-five percent (25%) contingency, shall not exceed FIFTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($50,000.00) without the prior written authorization of
the City.
b. The above compensation shall include all costs, including, but not limited
to, all clerical, administrative, overhead, insurance, reproduction, telephone, travel, auto rental,
subsistence and all related expenses.
3. Pavment.
a.. As scheduled services are completed, Contractor shall submit to City an
invoice for the services completed, authorized expenses and authorized extra work actually
performed or incurred.
b. All such invoices shall state the basis for the amount invoiced, including
services completed, the number of hours spent and any extra work performed.
c. City will pay Contractor the amount invoiced within thirty (30) days of
approval of all deliverables.
d. Payment shall constitute payment in full for all services, authorized costs
and authorized extra work covered by that invoice.
4. Change Orders. No payment for extra services caused by a change in the scope
or complexity of work, or for any other reason, shall be made unless and until such extra services
and a price therefor have been previously authorized in writing and approved by the City as an
amendment to this Agreement. The amendment shall set forth the changes of work, extension of
time for preparation and adjustment of the fee to be paid by City to Contractor.
5. Licenses. Contractor represents that it and any subcontractors it may engage
possess any and all licenses which are required under state or federal law to perform the work
contemplated by this Agreement and that Contractor and subcontractors, if any, shall maintain all
appropriate licenses, including a City of Orange business license, at its cost, during the
performance of this Agreement.
6. Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement,
Contractor shall be an independent contractor and not an employee of City. City shall have the
right to control Contractor only insofar as the result of Contractor's services rendered pursuant to
this Agreement. City shall not have the right to control the means by which Contractor
accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall, at its sole cost and
expense, furnish all facilities, materials and equipment which may be required for furnishing
services pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and shall
indemnify, defend and save City harmless from all matters relating to the payrnent of its
subcontractors, agents and employees, including compliance with social security, withholding
and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever.
Contractor acknowledges that Contractor and any subcontractors, agents or employees employed
by Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, be considered employees of the City, and that
they shall not be entitled to any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of the City,
including, but not limited to, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay, Public Employees
Retirement System benefits, or health, life, dental, long-term disability or workers' compensation
insurance benefits.
7. Contractor Not Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Contractor shall
have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an
agent. Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation
whatsoever.
8. Designated Persons. Only those persons designated in Exhibit "B", if any, shall
perform work provided for under this Agreement provided that it is understood by the parties that
clerical and other nonprofessional work may be performed by other employees of Contractor.
9. Assignment or Subcontractin�. No assignment or subcontracting by Contractor
of any part of this Agreement or of funds to be received under this Agreement shall be of any
force or effect unless the assignment has had the prior written approval of City. City may
terminate this Agreement rather than accept any proposed assignment or subcontracting. Such
assignment or subcontracting may be approved by the City Manager or his designee.
2
10. Time of Completion. Contractor agrees to commence the work provided for in
this Agreement within three (3) days of the date herein above stated and to diligently prosecute
completion of the work in accordance with the time period set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto or
otherwise agreed to by and between the representatives of the parties.
11. Time Is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Contractor
shall do all things necessary and incidental to the prosecution of Contractor's work.
12. Liquidated Damages. Contractor shall pay City, or have withheld from monies
due it, as liquidated damages, the sum of TWO HLTNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS and 00/100
($250.00) per day for each and every calendar day's delay in finishing the work within the time
specified, including any written extensions which may be granted, in writing, in accordance with
this Agreement.
13. Delays and Extensions of Time. Contractor's sole remedy for delays outside its
control, other than those delays that are caused by the City, shall be an extension of time. No
matter what the cause of the delay, Contractor must document any delay and request an extension
of time in writing at the time of the delay to the satisfaction of Ciry. Any extensions granted
shall be limited to the length of the delay outside Contractor's control. If Contractor believes that
delays caused by the City will cause it to incur additional costs, it must specify, in writing, why
the delay has caused additional costs to be incurred and the exact amount of such cost at the time
the delay occurs. No additional costs can be paid that exceed the not to exceed amount absent a
written amendment to this Agreement.
14. Products of Contractor. The documents, reports, studies, technical data, logs,
files, evaluations, assessments, plans, designs, materials, manuals and other products produced or
provided by Contractor for this Agreement shall become the property of City upon receipt.
Contractor shall deliver all such products to City prior to payment for same. City may use, reuse
or otherwise utilize such products without restriction.
15. Equal Emplovment Opportunitv. During the performance of this Agreement,
Contractor agrees as follows:
a. Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employrnent because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or mental or physical disability.
Contractor shall ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during
employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or mental or
physical disability. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment,
upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination,
rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for
employment, a notice setting forth provisions of this non-discrimination clause.
b. Contractor shall, in all solicitations and advertisements for employees
placed by, or on behalf of Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration
3
for employment without regard for race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or mental or
physical disability.
c. Contractor shall cause the foregoing paragraphs (a) and (b) to be inserted
in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement, provided that the foregoing
provisions shall not apply to subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials.
16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees that it shall not make, participate in the
making, or in any way attempt to use its position as a contractor to influence any decision of City
in which Contractar knows or has reason to know that Contractor, its officers, partners, or
employees have a financial interest as defined in Section 87103 of the Government Code.
Contractor further agrees that it shall not be eligible to work as the design/build firm for the
project that is the subject of this Agreement.
17. Indemnity.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold the City, its City Council and each member thereof, and the officers, employees
and representatives of the City (herein referred to collectively as the "Indemnitees") entirely
harmless from all liability arising out of:
(1) Any and all claims under worker's compensation acts and other employee
benefit acts with respect to Contractor's employees or Contractor's contractor's
employees arising out of Contractor's work under this Agreement; and
(2) Any claim, loss, injury to or death of persons or damage to property caused
by any act, neglect, default, or omission other than a professional act or omission
of the Contractor, or person, firm or corporation employed by the Contractor,
either directly or by independent contract, including all damages due to loss or
theft sustained by any person, firm or corporation including the Indemnitees, or
any of them, arising out of, or in any way connected with the work or services
which are the subject of this Agreement, including injury or damage either on or
off City's property; but not for any loss, injury, death or damage caused by the
active negligence or willful misconduct of City. The Contractor, at Contractor's
own expense, cost and risk, shall indemnify any and all claims, actions, suits or
other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the Indemnitees on any
such cla00im or liability covered by this subparagraph, and shall pay or satisfy any
judgment that may be rendered against the Indemnitees, or any of them, in any
action, suit or other proceedings as a result of coverage under this subparagraph.
b. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and
hold Indemnitees entirely harmless from all liability arising out of any claim, loss, injury to or
death of persons or damage to property caused by the negligent professional act or omission in
the performance of professional services pursuant to this Agreement.
4
c. Except far the Indemnitees, the indemnifications provided in this
Agreement shall not be construed to extend any third party indemnification rights of any kind to
any person or entity which is not a signatory to this Agreement.
18. Insurance.
a. Contractor shall carry workers compensation insurance as required by law
for the protection of its employees during the progress of the work. Contractor understands that
it is an independent contractor and not entitled to any worker's compensation benefits under any
City program.
b. Contractor shall maintain during the life of this Agreement,
comprehensive general liability insurance or commercial general liability insurance written on an
occurrence basis providing for a combined single limit of$2 million for bodily injury, death and
property damage.
c. Contractor shall maintain during the life of this Agreement, automotive
liability insurance on a comprehensive form covering all owned, non-owned and hired
automobiles providing for a combined single limit of $1,000,000 for bodily injury, death and
property damage.
d. Each policy of general liability and automotive liability shall provide that
City, its officers, agents, and employees are declared to be additional insureds under the terms of
the policy, but only with respect to the work performed by Contractor under this Agreement. A
policy endorsement to that effect shall be provided to the City along with the certificate of
insurance, which endorsement shall be on Insurance Services Office, Inc. Form CG 20 10 10 O1.
In lieu of an endorsement, the City will accept a copy of the policy(ies) which evidences that the
City is an additional insured as a contracting party.
e. Contractor shall maintain during the life of this Agreement professional
liability insurance coverage arising out of the performance of this Agreement with a combined
single limit of$5,000,000. Contractor agrees to keep such policy in force and effect for at least
five years from the date of completion of this Agreement.
f. The insurance policies maintained by Contractor shall be primary
insurance and no insurance held or owned by City shall be called upon to cover any loss under
the policy. Contractor will determine its own needs in procurement of insurance to cover
liabilities other than as stated above.
g. Before Contractor performs any work or prepares or delivers any
materials, Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements, as required by
City, evidencing the aforementioned general liability, automotive and professional liability
insurance coverages on forms acceptable to City, which shall provide that the insurance in force
will not be canceled or allowed to lapse without at least ten (10) days prior written notice to City.
5
h. Except for professional liability insurance coverage that may be required
by this Agreement, all insurance maintained by Contractor shall be issued by companies admitted
to conduct the pertinent line of insurance business in the State of California and having a rating
of Grade A or better and Class VII or better by the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide. In
the case of professional liability insurance coverage, such coverage shall be issued by companies
either licensed or admitted to conduct business in the State of California so long as such insurer
possesses the aforementioned Best's rating.
i. Contractor shall immediately notify the City if any required insurance
lapses or is otherwise modified and cease performance of this Agreement unless otherwise
directed by the City. In such a case, the City may procure insurance or self insure the risk and
charge Contractor for such costs and any and all damages resulting therefrom, by way of set-off
from any sums owed Contractor.
j. Contractor agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for
which it has agreed to provide insurance, Contractor shall look solely to its insurance for
recovery. Contractor hereby grants to the City, on behalf of any insurer providing insurance to
either the Contractor or to the City with respect to the services of Contractor herein, a waiver of
any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City
by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
k. Contractor shall include all subcontractors, if any, as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor to the City
for review and approval. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the
requirements stated herein.
19. Termination. The City may for any reason terminate this Agreement by giving
the Contractor not less than five (5) days written notice of intent to terminate. Upon receipt of
such notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease work, unless the notice from the City
provides otherwise. Upon the termination of this Agreement, the City shall pay Contractor for
services satisfactorily provided and all allowable reimbursements incurred to the date of
termination in compliance with this Agreement, unless termination by the City shall be for cause,
in which event the City may withhold any disputed compensation. The City shall not be liable
for any claim of lost profits.
20. Maintenance and Insnection of Records. In accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, Contractor and its subcontractors shall maintain reasonably full and
complete books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other information (collectively, the
"records") pertaining to the costs of and completion of services performed under this Agreement.
The City and any of their authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to audit
and reproduce any of Contractor's records regarding the services provided under this Agreement.
Contractor shall maintain all such records for a period of at least three (3) years after termination
or completion of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to make available all such records for
inspection or audit at its offices during normal business hours and upon three (3) days notice
from the City, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested.
6
21. Compliance with all Laws/Immigration Laws.
a. Contractor shall be knowledgeable of and comply with all local, state and
federal laws which may apply to the performance of this Agreement.
b. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor:
(1) Has complied and shall at all times during the term of this Agreement
comply, in all respects, with all immigration laws, regulations, statutes, rules,
codes, and orders, including, without limitation, the Immigration Reform and
Control Act of 1986 (IRCA); and
(2) Has not and will not knowingly employ any individual to perform services
under this Agreement who is ineligible to work in the United States or under the
terms of this Agreement; and
(3) Has properly maintained, and shall at all times during the term of this
Agreement properly maintain, all related employment documentation records
including, without limitation, the completion and maintenance of the Form I-9 for
each of Contractor's employees; and
(4) Has responded, and shall at all times during the term of this Agreement
respond, in a timely fashion to any government inspection requests relating to
immigration law compliance and/or Form I-9 compliance and/or worksite
enforcement by the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Labor,
or the Social Security Administration.
c. Contractor shall require all subcontractors to make the same
representations and warranties as set forth in Section b.
d. Contractor shall, upon request of the City, provide a list of all employees
working under this Agreement and shall provide, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City,
verification that all such employees are eligible to work in the United States. All costs associated
with such verification shall be borne by the Contractor. Once such request has been made,
Contractor may not change employees working under this Agreement without written notice to
the City, accompanied by the verification required herein for such employees.
e. Contractor shall require all subcontractors to make the same verification as
set forth in Section d.
f. Any Contractor or subcontractor who knowingly employs an employee
providing work under this Agreement who is not authorized to work in the United States, and/or
fails to follow federal laws to determine the status of such employee shall constitute a material
breach of this Agreement and may be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by the
City.
7
g. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its officials, and
employees harmless for, of and from any loss, including but not limited to fines, penalties and
corrective measures, the City may sustain by reason of the Contrator's failure to comply with said
laws, rules and regulations in connection with the performance of this Agreement.
22. Attornevs' Fees. If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or
interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable
attorneys' fees, costs, and necessary disbursements, in addition to any other relief to which it may
be entitled. If the City is the prevailing party and uses in-house counsel in the litigation, it shall
be entitled to recover attorneys' fees at the hourly rate that Constractor is being charged by its
attorney or at the in-house counsel's fully burdened rate, whichever is higher.
23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of the State of California and Contractor agrees to submit to the jurisdiction
of California courts.
24. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties. No
other agreement, oral or written, pertaining to the wark to be performed under this Agreement
shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by both parties. Any work
performed which is inconsistent with or in violation of the provisions of this Agreement shall not
be compensated.
25. Notice. Except as otherwise provided herein, all notices required under this
Agreement shall be in writing and delivered personally or by first class mail, postage prepaid, to
each party at the address listed below. Either party may change the notice address by notifying
the other party in writing. Notices may be sent by either e-mail or U.S. Mail. Notices shall be
deemed received upon receipt of same or within 3 days of deposit in the U.S. Mail, whichever is
earlier. Notices sent by e-mail shall be deemed received on the date of the e-mail transmission.
"CONTRACTOR" "CITY"
ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. City of Orange
1 Ada Parkway, Suite 100 300 E. Chapman Avenue
Irvine, CA 92618 Orange, CA 92866-1591
Attn: Chad Beckstrom, AICP Attn: Jennifer Le
Telephone No. 949-333-6625 Telephone No. 714-744-7238
E-Mail Address: cbeckstrom(a�icfi.com E-Mail Address:jle@cityoforange.org
8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to these presents have hereunto set their hands
the date and year first above written.
"CITY"
CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation
By:
Teresa E. Smith
Mayor
CONTRACT AND INSURANCE
APPROVED BY: ATTEST:
Gary A. Sheatz Mary E. Murphy, City Clerk
Senior Assistant City Attorney
"CONTRACTOR"
ICF JONES & STOKES, INC., a California
corporation
[Note: Signature of Chairman of the By:
Board, President or Vice President is Printed Name:
requiredJ Title:
�Note: Signature of Secretary,Assistant By:
Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or Printed Name:
Assistant Treasurer is also requiredJ Title:
9
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
[Beneath this sheet.]
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF WORK
The Consultant shall perform a third-party review of Applicant-submitted technical studies and
prepare CEQA compliance documents for the Santiago Hills II Project. Since a previously-
approved EIR was certified in 2005 for a larger project that included the Santiago Hills II
development, an Addendum may be appropriate for the proposed scaled-down development
(pending the outcome of the technical analyses which are currently being undertaken). This scope
of work assumes an Addendum is appropriate. If technical analysis yields a different conclusion,
a modified scope of work will be negotiated at that time.
Task 1- Third Party Review of Applicant's Technical Submittals
The Consultant shall perform third-party review of Applicant-submitted technical studies. The
Applicant's studies are expected to include an updated conditions assessment and an updated
analysis of the impacts of the proposed project (as compared to the conclusions in the previously-
approved EIR). Applicant technical studies requiring review are as follows:
• Updated View Simulations
� Biology Letter Report Update
• Cultural Resources Letter Report Update
• Air Quality Analysis Update
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Noise Analysis Update
In addition, the following plans and technical information will also be available for use in the
preparation of CEQA documents. These do not require third-party review as these studies are
reviewed by City staff or other public agencies with approval authority. The Consultant shall
communicate early on if any additional technical information is needed to complete CEQA
compliance documents under Task 2.
• Tentative Tract Maps
• Grading Plans and associated Erosion Control Plans
• Design Guidelines
• Traffic Study
• Runoff Management Plan
• Water Quality Management Plan
• Water Supply Assessment
• Geotechnical Report Update
• Sub Area Master Plan
• Tree Survey Report and Tree Replacement Plan
Exhibit"A"-Page 1
The Consultant shall perform a third-party review of technical submittals as described above and
provide technical comments to the City. Technical comments shall focus on identifying any
deficiencies in the studies which need to be remedied in order for the studies to be sufficient for
use as supporting documentation for the CEQA document. One round of technical comments and
one follow-up technical review to ensure all comments were addressed is assumed. All
coordination, client meetings and communication necessary to produce this deliverable are
included as part of this task and this task cost.
Deliverables:
Technical review comments
Task 2 Prepare CEQA Addendum
Based on technical studies and the Consultant's independent analysis,the Consultant shall prepare
an Addendum to the previously-approved EIR. The Addendum shall provide a legally defensible
basis for making CEQA findings under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.
The City anticipates use of a modified Initial Study format for the Addendum or possibly use of
the previously-approved EIR's format for ease of impact comparison, format to be approved by
the City. The Addendum shall include a detailed Project Description, Environmental Setting,
Impact Analysis, Mitigation Measures, Summary Conclusions and Technical Appendices. For
each environmental issue area, the Addendum shall describe existing conditions, evaluate and
identify the impacts of the proposed project, identify mitigation measures, identify the level of
impact after-mitigation, and compare the impacts of the proposed project with those disclosed in
the previously-approved EIR. Ultimately, the Addendum shall come to a conclusion for each issue
area as to whether the proposed project would result in new significant impacts or a substantial
increase in the severity of a previously-identified impact, or new mitigation measures, compared
to the impacts and mitigation measures identified in the previously-approved EIR.
The Consultant shall perform all research and analysis (beyond those technical studies provided
by the Applicant) necessary to prepare a well-supported and legally-defensible Addendum. All
coordination, client meetings and communications necessary to produce this deliverable are also
included in this task and task cost. Screencheck drafts submitted by the consultant must be
complete and in final form. It is the Consultant's responsibility to respond to City comments and
make revisions as needed to deliver a document that meets the City's needs. The City expects that
one screencheck draft Addendum will be sufficient, with a final a follow-up review to ensure all
previous comments were addressed.
Deliverables:
• Screencheck draft(s) of the Addendum
• Final Addendum
Electronic submittals shall be in PDF and Microsoft Word format. The City will accept electronic
submittals for draft deliverables but will require electronic and hardcopies for final documents. A
Exhibit"A" -Page 2
production budget shall be included in the cost to cover 40 hardcopies of the final CEQA
documents.
Task 3 Public Hearings
The Consultant shall attend the project's Design Review Committee, Planning Commission, and
City Council hearings.Three(3)public hearings should be assumed for cost purposes.The selected
Consultant may be asked to make presentations and respond to questions regarding CEQA
compliance at the hearings. All exhibits and other presentation materials are included in this task.
Exhibit"A" -Page 3
EXHIBIT "B"
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL
[Beneath this sheet.]
,
� ��7i r� ieip � �'"il� �,��� ,i�
Proposal for the
Santiago Hills II Project
Third-Party Technical
Review and CEQA
s���� ���� ���
� �� Addendum
, �
�
���������.
�
����€���� ,�W..
�������
�������a��
�����'`
�������
x
������ .
�����
����� � , � .
������� �' ' '` March 1, 2016
�������� �
�;��°����'�`a� ��� ���, ��
..��a.�..J..�..,�..s�e.��,s.�i::.....:...,..���.� .:.,��,�o:��`� .
Submitted to:
City of Orange
Community Development Department
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866
Contact: Jennifer Le, Principal Planner
Submitted by:
ICF Jones&Stokes, Inc.
1 Ada, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
Contact: Donna McCormick, AICP
F
March 1, 2016
Jennifer Le, Principal Planner
City of Orange
Community Development Department
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866
Delivered via email:jle@cityoforange.org
SUBJECT: Proposal to Provide Environmental Consultant Services
Santiago Hills II Project—Third Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
Dear Ms. Le:
ICF Jones &Stokes, Inc. (an ICF International company hereinafter"ICF") is pleased to submit a proposal for
the environmental services related to Santiago Hills II Project. We look forward to again assisting the City of
Orange with this project. This proposal outlines our proposed key staff and qualifications, experience on similar
projects, scope of work, schedule, and required disclosures. Our time and materials cost proposal is also
provided in a separate file.
ICF's experience and knowledge of the environmental conditions related to the Santiago Hills II Project is
extensive and unique since we were the City's environmental consultant for the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East
Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR. During the preparation of the previous EIR, ICF worked successfully with both
the City and The Irvine Company to produce a comprehensive and legally defensible document, surviving legal
challenges. According to the City's primary planner on the project at that time, Ed Knight, without ICF's
"leadership and negotiation skills, this could not have been accomplished."
In order to ensure that the City's planned Addendum is just as successful,we are proposing Donna McCormick
as our project manager, the same project manager as for the 2005 SEIR/EIR. With this experience, she will
have no learning curve. Donna is a highly experienced CEQA project manager with a large portfolio of projects
for local jurisdictions with developer applicants. She will be assisted by local staff with specialized skills in the
topics requested by the City. Our team also includes the lead editor for the 2005 SEIR/EIR, Elizabeth Irvin,
ensuring seamless continuity with the previous document. ICF is proposing Chad Beckstrom as our project
director. Chad is the branch leader of our Irvine office; he will make sure that all the resources necessary to
meet the City's aggressive schedule are available.
ICF is ready to begin working immediately on the Santiago Hills II Project third-party review and Addendum. If
selected as the successful bidder, ICF looks forward to quickly negotiating mutually acceptable contract terms
1 Ada Parkway,Suite tOQ � Irvine,CA 92618 �- 949.333,66U0 *�-�-+- 949.333.6601 fax +�—�- icfi.com
City of Orange
March 1, 2016
Page 2
and conditions. Please do not hesitate to contact Chad Beckstrom should you have any questions regarding
this proposal at(949)333-6625 or via e-mail at chad.beckstrom@icfi.com.We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
(�,,�,,�-�����---�'.�,�,i+��--.._,�_ oa�-- � V
Chad R. Beckstrom, AICP Jodi Young
Principal/Irvine Branch Leader Contract Manager
Attachments: Key Staff and Qualifications
Similar Projects
Scope of Work
Schedule
Disclosure
Appendix(Key Staff Resumes)
Cost Proposal (separate file)
Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum '
Contents
Key Staff and Q�alifications ............................................................................................ 1
Donna McCormick, Project Manager............................................................................................... 1
Chad Beckstrom, Project Director................................................................................................... 1
KeyStaff...........................................................................................................................................2
SimilarPrajects ............................................................................................................... 4
Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR........................................................................4
Tejon Mountain Village EIR and Tehachapi Mountains Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan
EIS.....................................................................................................................................................5
City of Goleta Shelby Trust and Kenwood Village EIRs....................................................................6
Scopeaf Wc�rk.............................................................................................................a... 7
Task 1: Provide Third-Party Review of Applicant's Technical Studies.............................................7
Task2: Prepare Addendum........................................................................................................... 10
Task3: Public Hearings ................................................................................................................. 11
Schedule ....................................................................................................................... �2
Disclosure .......................�........,..........,................,........,..,.............................,.............. 12
App�ndix: Key Staff Resum�s
March 1, 2016 Page i
� Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
Key Staff and Qualifications
For the Santiago Hills 11 Project, ICF has assembled a team of professionals whose qualifications best suit
them to provide the City of Orange with third-party reviews of applicant-submitted technical studies and
high-caliber, legally defensible California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) documentation. Their
qualifications are described below, and their resumes are included in the appendix to this document.
I�onna McCormick, Pr�j�ct Manager
We are offering Donna McCormick as our project manager. Donna was W'I I III II I
the project manager and primary author of the 2005 Santiago ° ' • � ' ' ' �
Hills II/East Orange General Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact ' � " ' '
Report/Environmental Impact Report(SEIR/EIR). Her key role in the
previous EIR and her extensive knowledge of CEQA make her the ideal • ' ' • - "
choice for the City. She will be able to pick up right where she left off in ' '' ' ' �'' �
2005. Since then, Donna has authored several development project EIRs � �� � ' �
...
for the City of Goleta, La Canada Flintridge, and Kern County, and she �
. ,.
has managed large-scale transit, restoration, and infrastructure EIRs.
r-.. .
Donna is one of the primary CEQA experts at ICF, providing CEQA � � . � .
training both to staff and clients, as well as through University of � � .,�. . � .
California extension programs and planning organizations. She is also a -.. . . . . .
highly skilled project manager and provides project management • •-- • • • -•
training to staff and clients.l . • . - .. . . . .
• •��� r s
Donna's management of the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General
Plan SEIR/EIR played an important part in the timely completion of the � • � � .
environmental process as well ensuring that the EIR survived litigation. . , . . . ..
She was able to balance the needs of the City and the applicant(the - .. • . . . .
Irvine Company), bringing to bear her experience in CEQq, leadership, • �
and negotiation (see sidebar). This was a complicated EIR—part '' ' °+ " � " ' '
project-level and part program-level, part supplemental and part ' ' '" " ' ' '' '
original. There were a number of challenging environmental issues, ' ' ' �
including biological resources, cultural resources,water resources,
. ..-
aesthetics,traffic,and noise. The resulting document was well
organized, reader-friendly, comprehensive, and accurate. Although the document was challenged in
court, it prevailed, maintaining Donna's perfect record in CEQA litigation.
Chad Be�kstrom, Project Diz�ectUr
Chad Beckstrom will serve as the project director, available to the City as needed. He will ensure that all
the resources are available to complete this project within the short timeframe anticipated by the City.
Chad is a seasoned principal consultant with experience directing and preparing multidisciplinary
'"Chart Your Path to Successful Project Management." Project Management Institute(PMI)accredited.
March 1, 2016 Page 1
Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum -
environmental documents for a wide range of projects. He provides his clients with expert professional
advice related to CEQA and is no stranger to complex and controversial projects. Chad's project portfolio
has included park and recreation facilities, renewable energy,transportation, ports and coastal
development, large-scale master planning, urban and rural residential, commercial and industrial
development, and redevelopment institutional and school campus facility projects for government
agencies, special districts, and private applicants. He has recently been the project director of several
projects for which addenda were prepared. Chad is the Irvine Branch Leader and can mobilize the
necessary staff and resources for the Santiago Hills II Project and provide quality control for ICF's work.
� . .
. �
Tanyalones
• • � • CEQA Documentation
. � . � . �
' � ' ` ' Elizabeth Irvin
Editor
Donna Greg Hoisington Mark Robinson Shannon Peter Hardie
McCormick Biological Resources Cultural Resources Hatcher Noise
View Simulations Peer Review Peer Review Air Quality/GHGs Peer Review
K�'y 5����
Donna and Chad will draw on key staff in reviewing the technical documents from the applicant and
preparing a CEQA-compliant document(assumed to be an addendum).
View Simulatians: Danna 11�[cCormick
Donna's technical expertise includes aesthetics and visual impacts, and she has a broad range of
experience in creating and reviewing visualizations. With a degree in landscape architecture,she brings
a three-dimensional eye to her analysis, and she will use this to compare the proposed project plans and
the updated view simulations to ensure their accuracy. Donna provided this same service for the 2005
Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR,working closely with The Irvine Company's
consultant to ensure that the visualizations were suitable for CEQA analysis purposes.
Bialogical Reso��-ces: Gi•e�HQisin�ton
Greg will conduct a peer review of the biological letter report update. Greg's technical experience
includes a broad range of interdisciplinary projects in biological resource identification and assessment;
aquatic resource delineation; biological permitting and compliance; and environmental document
preparation. Greg's expertise includes preparation of environmental documents for compliance with
March 1, 2016 Pa�e 2
� Santiago Hills il Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
CEQA, California Endangered Species Act/Federal Endangered Species Act, and the Orange County
Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP). He is ideally suited to
review the biological report.
C�zlt«x�al Ressaurces: Mar1c T2abinsan
Mark will conduct a peer review of the cultural resources letter report update. He is a cultural resources
specialist with more than 20 years of experience in prehistoric and historical archaeology and has
worked extensively in California. Mark has managed all phases of archaeological activities, including
surveys,testing, data recovery excavations, monitoring,site evaluation, analysis, report preparation,
and archival research. He has extensive knowledge of the archaeology of Orange County and the
surrounding areas. (Note: In the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR, no historic
architectural resources were identified in the study area,so we have not included an architectural
historian in our proposal. However, ICF has this expertise and can provide such services if necessary.)
Air Quality and Greenhnuse Gas F.'missiaz�s, S11gin[ac�x� N��tcher
Shannon will conduct a peer review of the air quality analysis update and greenhouse gas(GHG)
emissions technical documentation. Shannon is an air quality and climate change expert with extensive
experience in emissions inventory development, environmental impact analysis, report preparation, and
environmental noise monitoring. He manages and prepares air quality and climate change studies for a
variety of development, planning, infrastructure, and transportation projects. Shannon's lead
responsibilities include field investigations, modeling assessments, impact analysis, mitigation,strategies
and report preparation, analysis and document peer review, and quality assurance/quality control.
Nc�is€�: 1'c�tcr H�ardie
Peter will conduct a peer review of the noise analysis update. Peter has extensive experience in
acoustical analysis for a wide array of projects, including residential development, master plan
development, roadway,and rail projects throughout southern California. He has conducted and
participated in noise and vibration analyses for numerous transportation, commercial, industrial, and
residential development projects throughout California. Peter also provides modeling of existing and
future conditions to determine potential project-related noise impacts. He is an experienced peer
reviewer for noise and vibration analyses.
CEQA Docutreentatian; 'Tany�Jones
Tanya will be assisting Donna and the peer reviewers in preparing the CEQq document for the revised
Santiago II Project,assumed to be an addendum. She is an experienced CEQq analyst and has provided
similar CEQA documents for projects throughout Orange County and elsewhere, including several recent
and local addenda for the City of Irvine. Tanya has served as deputy project manager, project
coordinator, and environmental planner/author for a wide range of projects, including commercial,
residential, redevelopment, infill development, solar,transportation, and utility projects.
March 1, 2016 Page 3
Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum '
Editing: E�izabeth Irvin
One of the primary reasons that ICF's documents are so well organized and reader-friendly is our
outstanding editing staff. Elizabeth (Liz) Irvin is the head of our editing team in Irvine and was the lead
editor of the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR. She will provide templates for the
CEQA document, consistent with the previous EIR and the City's desired format. Liz will be responsible
for ensuring that the documents ICF provides the City meets their high expectation for content and
quality.
Similar Projects
ICF has extensive experience providing technical
. � . � - . .
environmental services for local agencies for , � . � �
environmental documents, planning, and permitting.
. • .
We have highlighted three such projects that were
. .. -. �� ...- .
managed by our proposed project manager, Donna ,__
. . .
McCormick, including the previous 2005 Santiago Hills II/ � � .� �. ��. �
East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR. We have also , ,, � �. .� �,
recently completed several similar projects for the City ..,- .
of Irvine involving peer reviews and addenda based on . .�• • . -
initial study checklists(see sidebar). We believe that �- • • � • • •• -• • �
these examples provide a good indication of our •��' �
qualifications for the planned addendum for the �' ' ' • ' '• "•
Santiago Hills II Project. �� '"� '
Santiago Hilis II jEast fJr�nge General Plan SEIRJEIR
The Santiago Hills II (SHII) and East Orange General Plan (EOGP) involved a comprehensive amendment
to the EOGP, pre-zoning of the largely undeveloped planning area, and a specific development proposal
involving a tentative tract map for SHII on a portion of the EOGP.Additional project components
included a runoff management plan (ROMP), modifications to the master plan of arterial highways
(MPAH), annexation of the property to the City from the County of Orange, development agreement,
and a tentative tract map for a portion of the EOGP.
For the purposes of environmental review,these
6 projects were considered together within one EIR,
with the EOGP components analyzed on a program
level,and the SHII components analyzed on a
project level. The SHII portion of the document was
a supplemental EIR,supplementing two previous
CEQA documents, a 1989 program EIR, and a 2000
supplemental EIR. The combination of project-level
and program-level analysis, plus a supplemental EIR
and an original EIR, all under one cover, made this
March 1, 2016 Page 4
� Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
document particularly challenging. ICF (then Jones &Stokes)was retained by the City of Orange to
prepare this document, based on a combination of technical reports provided by the applicant (The
Irvine Company),technical analysis provided by other City consultants, and technical analysis provided
by ICF. There was a large group of other contributors to the environmental process, including several
staff inembers from City departments,the applicant's staff and consultants, attorneys for the City and
for the applicant, and ultimately the public, City Planning Commission, and City Council. The project had
a fairly high level of controversy based on its location,the surrounding neighborhoods, and the
environmental conditions on the site.
The project was managed for ICF by Donna McCormick, who is our proposed project manager for the
City's planned addendum.2 (Liz Irvin, our proposed editor for the planned addendum,was the lead
editor for this project.) During her tenure, Donna not only managed the preparation of the Draft
SEIR/EIR, responses to comments, Final SEIR/EfR, and other related documents, but she also provided
ongoing CEQA advice to the City, helped negotiate solutions when issues arose between the applicant
and the City, and worked carefully with the legal staffs of both the City and the applicant to prepare for
the expected litigation, in which the City prevailed. She suggested and facilitated offsite "summit
meetings"to work through the final issues just before publication of the Draft SEIR/EIR and for the
responses to comments and revisions in the Final SEIR/EIR. Donna brought our editing staff to these
meetings so we could make live, on-screen revisions to the document to allow timely production of the
final documents.
'I"ejan Mountain Village EIR and
Tehachapi Mountains Multi-Species Habitat Cc�nservatia� Plan EIS
Tejon Mountain Village is a proposed �,,.,,,,
residential, commercial, and recreational ,,(�i � ,���"��`�i� '
development on Tejon Ranch in southern Kern " �� �
County. This highly controversial project
included a specific plan for 3,450 residences, 160,000 square feet of commercial development, 750 units
of resort lodging, 36 holes of golf, equestrian facilities,trails, and community facilities. The project
would only develop approximately 5,000 acres within a 29,000-acre site, leaving 80%of the land
undeveloped. ICF prepared the EIR for the project,which was certified by Kern County and withstood
both Superior Court and Appellate Court challenges by national opposition groups. ICF also provided
the environmental impact statement(EIS)for the required multi-species habitat conservation plan
(MSHCP), which covered 25 species, including the California condor,for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Donna McCormick was the project manager for the EIR and EIS, managing a large team of analysts,
scientists, and writers to analyze the impacts of the 29,000-acre project as well as the 141,000 acres of
covered lands for the MSHCP. Nearly every issue in the CEQA checklist had to be analyzed in detail,with
substantial analyses for aesthetics (views from I-5), agriculture (previous ranch land), air quality, biology
z Donna started as the project director for this project but took over as the project manager during the preparation
of the Draft SEIR/EIS when the original project manager transferred to another office.
March 1, 2016 Page 5
Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum '
(many special-status species, important wildlife movement corridors, and multipte blue-line streams),
cultural resources(multiple archaeologicat resources),geology(adjacent to San Andreas fault and
bisected by the Garlock fault),water resources (including Tejon Lake), hazardous materials (previous
agricultural use and naturally occurring arsenic), mineral resources(adjacent to active mines), land use
(general plan amendment), public services and utilities (required extending services), and water supply
(new large-scale development).
Though this project was complex and controversial, ICF
was able to provide comprehensive, reader-friendly
documents in a timely manner that withstood legal
scrutiny. Other staff proposed for the City's planned
addendum that worked on the Tejon Mountain Village
"����� documents included Tanya Jones(CEQA
� � documentation), Liz Irvin (editor), Mark Robinson
(cultural resources),Shannon Hatcher(air quality/
GHGs), and Peter Hardie (noise).
City of Goleta Shelby Tr�st and Kenwo�rc111i11age EIRs
With Donna McCormick as the project manager, ICF prepared EIRs for two related residential
developments in Goleta—the Shelby Trust Development and Kenwood Village. Each of these specific
plan projects would convert isolated parcels of agricultural land to residential and recreational land uses
and remove open space designations from the Goleta General Plan Open Space Map. The Shelby Trust
Development would provide 60 residential units and private parkland on approximately 14 acres.
Kenwood Village would also provide 60 residential units and private parkland on 10 acres. The two
projects were originally going to be analyzed in one EIR, but were eventually split into two EIRs due to
divergent schedules by the project proponents. Each project needed to supplement the existing General
Plan EIR and provide a project-specific EIR for the development proposals. Each project had to consider
the other in their cumulative impact analysis.
Both projects were located along EI Encanto Creek,which was recognized as a Significant Ecological Area
in the Goleta General Plan. eiological and hydrological issues were important considerations in the
projects' designs and in their EIRs. Other
primary environmental issues shared by both
projects were the conversion of agricultural land, ��r;�,
contributions to traffic impact impacts, and �;`�
,,
water supply. For Shelby Trust Development,
other key environmental issues were views of
the Santa Ynez Mountains and compatibility with
the existing adjacent golf course. For Kenwood
Village, issues included noise impacts and health ��'
March 1, 2016 Page 6
� Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
risk assessment, due to its location adjacent to the existing U.S. 101 freeway.
ICF wrote the program-level EIR for the City of Goleta's first General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan when
the City was incorporated, and so was able to analyze the revisions to the general plan's maps and
policies necessary for approval of the two projects. ICF provided peer review of applicant-supplied
reports and conducted additional analysis for both EIRs.
Other staff proposed for the City's planned addendum that worked on the Goleta EIRs included Tanya
Jones (CEQA documentation), Liz Irvin (editor), Mark Robinson (cultural resources),Shannon Hatcher(air
quality/GHG), and Peter Hardie (noise).
n � .„� , ,
� `�•
��.�+`��'�" �,� ""«" k
gy�. F
.�"�
t
_ � �ti,,.� ,,�� �
�h,. ' r �., .
�
._,x
'� 4� � �':; . , .. . .. . a.
Scope of Work
ICF will build on our extensive in-house knowledge of the Santiago Hills II Project learned when we
wrote the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR and recent information provided by
City and the applicant to provide third-party technical review and CEQA document preparation for the
Santiago Hills II Project. Based on the Request for Proposals for Environmental Services from the City of
Orange, ICF proposes the following scope of work.
`I'ask 1� Froeride Third-P'arty Review of Applicant's Technical Studies
ICF will provide third-party review of technical documents identified in the City's Request for Proposals.
These documents will be reviewed for technical adequacy, accuracy, and for their use in informing the
CEQA analysis associated with the planned addendum by comparing them to the 2005 Santiago Hills
II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR. In preparation for reviewing the technical documents, ICF will
review the plans and other technical information provided by the City or applicant, including the
following:
• Tract maps
• Grading plans and associated erosion control plans
• Design guidelines
• Traffic study
• Runoff management plan
• Water quality management plan
March 1, 2016 Page 7
Santiago Hills 11 Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum �
• Water supply assessment
• Geotechnical report update
• Tree survey report and tree replacement plan
ICF will not provide technical review of the above-listed documents, but will use them to inform our
third-party reviews. We will also inform the City of any additional technical information that may be
required to support our reviews or the planned addendum.
ICF will document our technical reviews in comment letter reports,one for each review. These letter
reports will identify any deficiencies in the studies that need to be remedied in order to support the
planned addendum. For purposes of this proposal, we assume one comment letter report for each
identified topic and one follow-up review to ensure that all comments have been addressed,
documented in a memorandum to the City. We have assumed one meeting between our technical staff
and the City and/or applicant representatives(in person or by conference call)for each topic.
Subtas;k 1,I: T�Cird-Purty Revaew vf Updarted Vf�w Sirr�ulatrrrxis
The ICF visual specialist will review the updated view simulations provided by the applicant to
ensure that the simulations are accurate and provide the necessary information to inform the
aesthetics analysis for the addendum. To be adequate,the simulations must provide similar
information to that in the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR, updated for
the new project information. The previous document found significant and unavoidable visual
impacts related to visual character or quality. It also found significant but mitigatable impacts
related to new light sources and scenic vistas and found less-than-significant impacts related to
scenic highways. Our review will ensure that the updated view simulations show that these
findings are still appropriate in order to support an addendum under CEQA.
Su�itcrsdc 1.2. Third-Pcarty R�vte�of B�olac�icczd Letter°Re�.rart Updrrte
ICF biologists will review the biological letter report update provided by the applicant to ensure
that the report is accurate and provides the necessary information to inform the biological
resources analysis for the addendum. To be adequate,the report must provide similar
information to that in the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR, updated for
the new project information and any changes in the existing environment or regulatory
conditions. In the previous EIR, potentially significant but mitigatable impacts were identified
for special-status species, riparian or other natural communities, aquatic resources, and conflicts
with an adopted HCP/NCCP. Less-than-significant impacts were identified for wildlife
movement and conflicts with adopted policies protecting biological resources. Our review will
ensure that the biological letter report update documents that these findings are still
appropriate in order to support an addendum under CEQA.
S��btask 1.3: Thfrd-Party R�.aview o/'�ultur•cr1 Resr�urces Letter R'epQrt t/pdate
ICF archaeologists will review the cultural resources letter report update provided by the
applicant to ensure that the report is accurate and provides the necessary information to inform
the cultural resources analysis for the addendum. To be adequate,the report must provide
March 1, 2016 Page 8
� Santiago Hills 11 Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
similar information to that in the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR,
updated for the new project information and any changes in the existing environment or
regulatory conditions. In the previous EIR, potentially significant but mitigatable impacts were
identified related to adverse changes in known archaeological or historical resources, adverse
changes in significance of archaeological or historical resources, and potential to disturb human
remains. Our review will ensure that the cultural resources letter report update documents that
these findings are still appropriate in order to support an addendum under CEQA.
5uhtask 1.4: Third-Party R�vaer�af Air Qualft,�Analysis Ll�date
ICF air quality specialists will review the air quality analysis update provided by the applicant to
ensure that the report is accurate and provides the necessary information to inform the air
quality analysis for the addendum. To be adequate,the report must provide similar information
to that in the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR, updated for the new
project information and any changes in the existing conditions or regulatory conditions. The
previous document found significant and unavoidable impacts related to construction and
operational emissions. It also found less-than-significant impacts related to carbon monoxide
concentrations and cancer risks. Our review will ensure that the air quality analysis update
documents that these findings are still appropriate in order to support an addendum under
CEQA.
Si�btask 1.5; Third-f'ar�ty Review af Greerzhocrse Ga�s Ernissinras Document
ICF climate change specialists will review the GHG emissions document provided by the
applicant to ensure that the report is accurate and provides the necessary information to
support the addendum. It should be noted that GHG emissions were not addressed in the
previous EIR. For this proposal, we are assuming that the applicant's proposed project will
offset all GHG emissions, or use similar methods,to avoid impacts that would trigger the need
for a supplemental EIR or mitigated negative declaration.
Scrbtcrsk 1,6: Third-Pcrrty R�view vf Noisc Analy,sis Update
ICF noise specialists will review the noise analysis update provided by the applicant to ensure
that the report is accurate and provides the necessary information to inform the noise analysis
for the addendum. To be adequate,the report must provide similar information to that in the
2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR, updated for the new project
information and any changes in the existing environment or regulatory conditions. In the
previous EIR, potentially significant but mitigatable impacts were identified related to
construction noise,traffic-generated noise, and exposure of new noise-sensitive land uses to
existing outdoor noise levels above the City standard. Our review will ensure that the noise
analysis update documents that these findings are still appropriate in order to support an
addendum under CEQA.
March 1, 2016 Page 9
Santiago Hills 11 Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA AddencNum �
Subtask 1.7: Compliance Reviews
ICF will provide a follow-up review to ensure that all comments have been addressed,
documented in memoranda to the City. If necessary to resolve issues, ICF's technical experts
will meet with the City and applicant, in person or by conference call.
Tcrsk 1 Deliver�rbles:
• Letter reports of third-party reviews (6) (electronic submittal in PDF and Microsoft Word format):
o Updated view simulations
o Biological letter report update
o Cultural resources letter report update
o Air quality analysis update
o GHG emissions document
o Noise analysis update
• Memorandum of compliance (6) (etectronic submittal in PDF and Microsoft Word format):
o Updated view simulations
o Biological letter report update
o Cultural resources letter report update
o Air quality analysis update
o GHG emissions document
o Noise analysis update
Task 2: Prepare Addendur��
ICF will prepare an addendum to the 2005 Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR based on
the information provided by the City and the applicant, as modified by our third-party reviews (Task 1).
This proposal assumes the use of a modified initial study format for the addendum.3 The addendum will
include the following sections:
• Project Description, summarizing the previous project and detailing the changes addressed in the
addendum.
• Environmental Setting,summarizing the setting information in the previous EIR and specifically
addressing any changes in the setting since the previous EIR, including any changes in the regulatory
setting.
• Impact Analysis, discussing each environmental topic and addressing how the revised project is
consistent with the previous findings related to impacts. (Because the CEQA document is assumed
to be an addendum, no substantive changes in the findings are assumed for this proposal, and the
project is assumed to be offsetting any GHG emissions impacts in order to avoid the need for a�
supplemental CEQq document, as discussed in Task 1.)
3 Alternatively,at the discretion of the City,the format of the previously approved EIR will be used.
March 1, 2016 Page 10
Santiago Hills 11 Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
• Mitigation Measures, incorporating by reference all previous mitigation (from the 2005 Santiago
Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR and from 2000 SEIR 1278), and addressing any non-
substantive changes to the mitigation. (Because the CEQA document is assumed to be an
addendum, no substantive changes to mitigation are assumed for this proposal.)
• Summary Conclusions, documenting the conclusions of the addendum, including the level of impact
after mitigation, and comparing the impacts on those disclosed in the previously certified EIR.
• Technical Appendices,assumed to be provided by the applicant or City, as revised per the third-
party reviews(Task 1).
ICF will provide all the research and analysis necessary for a well-supported and legally defensible
addendum, based on a comparison of the proposed project to the project as proposed in the 2005
Santiago Hills II/East Orange General Plan SEIR/EIR. For purposes of this proposal,we assume that the
technical studies provided by the applicant and reviewed by ICF(Task 1)will be adequate to support the
addendum, and that the other information provided by the applicant or City but not peer-reviewed by
ICF will be adequate and will not require augmenting or technical analysis (e.g.,grading plans, erosion-
control plans,traffic study, runoff management plan, water quality management plan, water supply
assessment,geotechnical report, and tree survey report/tree replacement plan). No additional
fieldwork or technical analysis is anticipated for this proposal.
ICF will coordinate with the City(and, if desired,with the applicant)to obtain any information necessary
to prepare the addendum. For this proposal we have assumed two meetings (in person or by
conference call)during the preparation of the screencheck draft document. ICF will submit the
screencheck draft document to the City and revise it per City comments. We assume one meeting or
conference call to address any outstanding comments before providing a final addendum.
Task l Delivcru�iles:
• Screencheck draft of addendum (electronic submittal in PDF and Microsoft Word format)
• Final addendum (electronic submittal in PDF and Microsoft Word format, plus 40 hard copies)
T�sk 3: I'ublic H�arings
ICF will attend three public hearings: Design Review Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council.
(Attendance at additional hearings can be provided for additional cost.) If required, ICF will make
presentations and respond to questions regarding CEQA compliance. For this proposal, it is assumed
that the project manager and up to two technical staff will attend each hearing to address anticipated
technical issues. This proposal assumes that any exhibits would be limited to PowerPoint presentations
and hard copies of the presentations. The addendum and supporting appendices are assumed as part of
Task 2.
7'ask 31?elivera6Ces:
• Public hearing presentations (electronic submittal in PDF and PowerPoint format, plus up to 25 hard
copies)
March 1, 2016 Page 11
Santiago Hilis II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum '
Schedule
ICF understands the City's desire for a timely turnaround for the third-party review and addendum and
has structured our team to facilitate this schedule. Our knowledge of the project and our experienced
team means we will be able to quickly mobilize. The following schedule is consistent with the City's
timeline and anticipates public hearing dates beginning in May 2016.
. . � f � � � ' �
�
.- � . i i
City Council Approval of Corrtract
ICF pertorms Third-Party Review
ICF prepares Screencheck Addendum
City review and comment&Applicant revisions � '
ICF performs Compliance Check of Tech Studies �
ICF revises Addendum
Public Hearings(up to 3) ' "�' '* �'
Meeting with City
* Public Meeting
� Deliverable
� ICF Task
� City Task
Disclosure
ICF has no conflicts of interest related to the Santiago Hills II Project. ICF does not have any contracts
with The Irvine Company and has not had any contracts with them within the last year.
March 1, 2016 Page 12
Appendix: Key Staff Resumes
Donna McCormick � Resume _ �
DONNA McCORMICK
Principal and Project Manager
Donna McCormick is a project manager, specializing in Years of Experience
environmental planning, environmental analysis, and visual
assessments for transportation (roadway, highway, transit, ■ Professional start date: 05119�7
etc.) projects, as well as for utility alignments, surface mining, ■ ICF start date: 0212002
campus master planning, land use, and coastal zone projects.
In this role, she manages the preparation of multidisciplinary Education
environmental documents, and provides aesthetics and visual ■ BLA, Landscape Architecture,
quality assessments for California Environmental Quality Act California State Polytechnic
(CEQA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and joint University, Pomona, 1987
documents. Further, Donna provides independent quality for professional Memberships
visual quality and general CEQA/NEPA adequacy. ■ Association of Environmental
Donna also provides visual assessment training using the Planners(former Administrative
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) methodology, and Vice President of Orange County
regularly teaches CEQA/NEPA classes through the University Chapter)
of California Extension Programs and custom workshops for ■ American Planning Association
clients. Donna's expertise includes analysis in sensitive areas
such as National Park Service (NPA) properties and wilderness areas, visual simulations using
various graphic arts programs, project management, and CEQA and NEPA training.
Project Experience
EIR and Supporting Studies for East Orange Projects—City of Orange, Orange, California
Served as principal-in-charge and project manager. Provided senior leadership and oversight
for a very controversial EIR for the East Orange General Plan (EOGP) and the Santiago Hills II
development, which proceeded on an aggressive one-year schedule. The proposal involved a
comprehensive amendment to the EOGP, pre-zoning of the largely undeveloped 7,110-acre
planning area, and a specific development proposal involving a tentative tract map for Santiago
Hills II on an approximate 494-acre portion of the EOGP. Additional project components
included a runoff management plan (ROMP), modifications to the master plan of arterial
highways (MPAH), annexation of the prope�ty to the City from the County of Orange, possible
development agreements, and a tentative tract map for a portion of the EOGP. For the purposes
of environmental review, these projects were considered together within one EIR, with the
EOGP components to be analyzed on a "program" level, and the Santiago Hills II components
to be analyzed on a "project" level. The Santiago Hills II/East Orange Supplemental EIR/EIR
was completed in 2005 and successfully survived legal challenges.
Tejon Mountain Village EIR—Tejon Mountain Village LLC, Kern County, California
Tehachapi Uplands MSHCP EIS—Tejon Ranch/Tejon Mountain Village ��C, Kern 8� Los
Angeles Counties, California
Served as project manager/primary author for the EIR and EIS. Managed the preparation of an
EIR for a mixed-use resort and retirement community in the Tehachapi Mountains. This highly
Page 1
Donna McCormick � Resume
controversial project was designed to avoid impacts whenever possible and include many
innovative mitigation measures. Key issues include threatened and endangered species,
multiple archaeological resources, visual quality, conversion of agricultural lands, seismic safety
related to two major earthquake faults, impacts to and availability of water resources, fire risks,
wildlife corridors, transportation impacts, air quality, and impacts to and from major utilities
(high-pressure gas lines and large electrical transmission lines). The Tejon Mountain Village
EIR successfully survived legal challenges
The Tehachapi Uplands MSHCP was prepared for 27 federal- and state-listed and unlisted
species, including the California condor, Tehachapi slender salamander, and a newly
discovered species, Tehachapi buckwheat. The Covered Lands that are included in the plan
include 141,886 acres in the Tehachapi Mountains in Kern and Los Angeles counties. Worked
in close cooperation with the USFWS.
Shelby Trust Residential Project EIR &Kenwood Village EIR—City of Goleta, California
Served as project manager for two closely related EIRs for the City of Goleta. The proposed
projects involved a residential development on former agricultural land, surrounded by existing
residential development and open space, and adjacent to EI Encanto Creek. Key environmental
issues addressed in the EIR included impacts to the creek and riparian habitat, conversion of
agricultural lands, traffic impacts, visual impacts, noise impacts, and health risks related to
diesel emissions from nearby highway. The cumulative impacts of the two closely related
projects were also a primary concern. The proposed projects were considered controversial
because it proposed conversion of agricultural land uses to non-agricultural uses and the
impacts to EI Encanto Creek.
CEQA Review of Policy and Procedures—Port of Los Angeles, San Pedro, California
Served as peer reviewer. Assisted in the review of the Port of Los Angeles' CEQA policies and
procedures. The analyses included a review of eight past environmental documents in light of
the requirements of CEQA guidelines, city significance criteria, and recent case law and
legislation related to CEQA. In addition, ICF reviewed the Port's CEQA manual, findings of fact,
and resolutions. Based on evaluations of Port documents, ICF recommended improvements to
current policies and procedures and presented these recommendations to an environmental
review committee and lead environmental staff.
Anaheim Fixed-Guideway (Anaheim Rapid Connection or ARCj Project Management
Consultant—City of Anaheim /IBI Group, Anaheim, California
Served as project manager. Provided peer review of all environmental documents, notices, and
other materials related to the CEQA and NEPA process. Providing guidance to the City of
Anaheim on the CEQA process and the NEPA process as implemented by the Federal Transit
Administration.
California High-Speed Rail EIR/EISs—California High-Speed Rail Authority—Throughout
California
Serving as quality control manager and peer reviewer. Responsible for ensuring consistent
environmental analysis for multiple environmental documents throughout the state in
accordance with the Environmental Methodology Guidelines of the High-Speed Rail Authority.
Page 2
Chad Beckstrom,AICP � Resume _ �
CHAD BECKSTROM, AICP
Principal, Project Director, Irvine Branch Leader
Chad Beckstrom is a seasoned principal consultant with nearly Years of Experience
20 years of experience directing and preparing multidisciplinary
environmental documents for a wide range of projects. He • Professional start date: 0811996
provides his clients with expert professional advice related to ■ ICF start date: 0811996
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and is Education
no stranger to complex and controversial projects. Chad's ■ MURP, Urban and Regional
project portfolio has included park and recreation facilities, Planning, California State
renewable energy, transportation, ports and coastal Polytechnic University, Pomona,
2001
development, large-scale master planning, urban and rural ■ gA, Environmental Analysis and
residential, commercial, and industrial development and Design, University of California,
redevelopment institutional and school campus facility projects Irvine, 1996
for government agencies, special districts, and private
applicants. He maintains a solid understanding of how the full Professional Memberships
range of environmental laws and regulatory requirements are ■ American Planning Association
integrated into the CEQA/NEPA review processes, including ■ Association of Environmental
the Clean Water Act (CWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), California Professionals
Fish and Game Code, and National Historic Preservation Act ■ Harbor Association of Industry
(NHPA). Chad also frequently teaches courses on CEQA and and Commerce, Board of
NEPA environmental review processes. Oirectors, 2013-Present
Project Experience Certifications
■ American Institute of Certified
Baker Ranch Residential Project IS/MND—City of Lake Planners, 2001-Present
Forest, California
Served as project director for the preparation of an IS/MND for Professional Development
the development of up to 250 single-family attached and ■ Introduction to CEQA, University
detached residential units on 30 acres. of California, Irvine Extension
■ CEQA Primer, University of
Milani Apartments Addendum to an EIR—City of Irvine, California, Irvine Extension
California ■ NEPA: A Step-by-Step Approach,
University of California, Riverside
Served as project director for the preparation of an Addendum Extension
to the City's Irvine Business Complex (IBC)Vision Plan and ■ Spring Advanced CEQA
Mixed Use Zoning Code EIR for the development of 280 multi- Workshop,Association of
family residential units on 3.6 acres. Environmental Professionals
■ Guest Course Lectures,
360° Fusion Apartments Addendum to an EIR—City of California State University,
Irvine, California Fullerton
Served as project director for the preparation of an Addendum
to the City's Irvine Business Complex (IBC)Vision Plan and Mixed Use Zoning Code EIR for the
development of 287 multi-family residential units on 3.6 acres.
Page 1
� Chad Beckstrom, AICP � Resume
2801 Kelvin Apartments Addendum to an EIR—City of Irvine, California
Served as project director for the preparation of an Addendum to the City's Irvine Business
Complex (IBC)Vision Plan and Mixed Use Zoning Code EIR for the development of 381 multi-
family residential units on 5.2 acres.
Pistoia Apartments CEQA Addendum—City of Irvine, California
Served as Project Director. Oversaw the preparation of the Addendum for the development of
an approximately 4.7-acre parcel for 371 multifamily residential units in the IBC.
The Met at South Coast Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration—City of Santa Ana,
California
Served as project director. Provided oversight and management in the preparation of an
IS/MND for the development of up to 303 multi-family residential units on a 3.1-acre site in the
MacArthur Place District Center.
Rosedale Ranch Project Program EIR—City of Bakersfield, California
Served as project manager. Managed the preparation of a program EIR and technical studies
for a new master planned community on approximately 1,655 acres in the northwestern
Bakersfield area in the unincorporated County of Kern. The project involves a 20-year plan for
the development of existing prime agricultural farmlands, and was planned to include 6,441 total
residential units, 211,266 square feet of commercial space, approximately 2.4 million square
feet of mixed-use commercial retail and office space, and approximately 3.5 million square feet
of light industrial warehouse and manufacturing, along with a lake and beach club, a community
sports park, village greens, various neighborhood parks, and trails.
Old River Ranch EIR—City of Bakersfield, California
Served as project manager. Managed the preparation of a program EIR and technical studies
for a new master-planned community on 1,853 acres in Kern County. The project included a
mixed-use development featuring 7,037 low- and high-density residential units, 686,080 square
feet of commercial retail, approximately 191,660 square feet of commercial office, recreation,
and public facilities. Additionally, public service uses such as schools would be included within
the plan area to accommodate future students generated by the proposed project.
Monrovia Nursery Specific Plan EIR—City of Glendora, California
Served as project manager for the preparation of an EIR involving subdivision of approximately
95 acres for the development of 130 single-family homes. The proposed project involves
annexation of a portion of the property from Los Angeles County. Major environmental issues
include aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils,
hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise and vibration, public services
and utilities, and transportation.
Page 2
Greg Hoisington � Resume _ '
GREG HOISINGT�N
Biologist
Greg Hoisington's technical experience includes a broad range Years of Experience
of interdisciplinary projects in biological resource identification
and assessment; aquatic resource delineation; biological • Professional start date: 04/2004
permitting and compliance; and environmental document • ICF start date: 11I2015
preparation. He has performed, led, and managed natural
resource field surveys and wetlands and waters delineations Education
for a wide range of projects in a diversity of habitats within ■ MS, Biology, California State
California, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah. Greg's experience University, Long Beach, 2004
includes preparation of environmental documents for ■ BS, Ecology and Environmen�al
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act/ Biology, California State
University, Long Beach, 2001
National Environmental Policy Act (CEQA/NEPA), California
Endangered Species Act/Federal Endangered Species Act Certifications
(CESA/FESA), Western Riverside County Multi-Species ■ Certified California Rapid
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and Orange County Assessment Method (CRAM)
Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Practitioner-Riverine and
Plan (NCCP/HCP). He has acquired natural resource permits Depressional Wetlands, MJ
and led consultations and negotiations with regulating Klinefelter, California, 2014
agencies including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Professional Development
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Marine ■ Wetland Delineation Certification,
Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish and Richard Chinn Environmental
Wildlife (CDFW), and California Coastal Commission (CCC). Training, California, 2005
Greg has facilitated on- and off-site mitigation, conducted • CEQA 16-Hour Training
restoration and reporting, and implemented adaptive workshop
management strategies in collaboration of restoration specialists.
Project Experience
Natural Resource Evaluations—First Industrial Realty Trust, Riverside and San Diego
Counties, California
While employed by URS, served as project manager for this $380,000 project. Managed habitat
field efforts for special-status plant and animals, wetland and other waters delineations for
numerous independent commercial business distribution centers (Rider Street, First Apache,
First Indian, First Nandina Center, Grove View, La Pacifica II, First 215, San Michelle). Managed
protocol MSHCP burrowing owl surveys, biotechnical and MSHCP Compliance document
reports, and authored jurisdictional delineations. Managed Cultural, Paleontological, and Phase
I tasks and project budgets. 2012-2015.
Los Angeles Mission College Expansion—Sylmar, California
While employed by URS, served as biologist for this $250,000 project. Authored the Biology
section of an EIR prepared for an expansion of the Los Angeles Mission College. Performed
Page 1
' Greg Hoisington ( Resume
biological resource assessments and delineated wetlands and other waters. Authored a
jurisdictional delineation report and responded to public comments. 2008-2009.
Natural Resource Evaluations—First Industrial Realty Trust, Riverside County, California
While employed by URS, served as field biologist for this $350,000 project. Performed habitat
analyses for special-status plants and animals, and wetland and other waters delineations for
seven, 40-500 acre proposed commercial business distribution centers. PerFormed protocol
MSHCP burrowing owl surveys, drafted biotechnical and Riverside County MSHCP Compliance
document reports, and authored jurisdictional delineations. 2001'r2012.
Site Evaluation and Natural Resaurces Field Survey—Casden Properties, Santa Clarita,
California
While employed by Tetra Tech, served as biologist for this $35,000 project. Performed a site
evaluation and natural resources field survey of an approximately 90 acre undeveloped open
space parcel in the city of Santa Clarita. Prepared a Biotechnical and Compliance Constraints
document. 2006.
Tehachapi Pass Second Main Track—BNSF, Tehachapi, California
While employed by URS, served as task manager for this $350,000 project. Performed a
wetlands and waters delineation along a 25-mile stretch of tracks proposed for expansion.
Authored a jurisdictional determination report and acquired CDFW 1602 and RWQCB Waste
Discharge Report, and consulted with agencies. Drafted the Biological Resources section of the
EIR and responded to comments. Managed preconstruction rare plant surveys, nesting bird
surveys, and bat habitat assessment. Managed biological budget. 200�2015.
�aguna Water and Sewer Upgrade Project—South Coast Water District (SCWD), Laguna,
California
While employed by Tetra Tech, served as biologist for this $160,000 project. Prepared three
CEQA IS biology sections for the installation of a new water line, the replacement of an existing
water line, and for the maintenance of two sanitary sewer lines. Identified required biological
surveys, biological sampling events, and required environmental permits. 2006.
Page 2
Mark Robinson, RPA � Resume _ '
MARK ROBINSON, RPA
Archaeologist
Mark Robinson is a cultural resources specialist with more than Years of Experience
20 years of experience in prehistoric and historical
archaeology. He has worked extensively in California, as well • Professional start date: 0511987
as in the Pacific Northwest, the Midwest, and on the Atlantic ■ ICF start date: 04I2004
seaboard. Mark has specialized training in lithic analysis and
lithic materials identification and sourcing and meets the Education
Secretary of Interior's standards for a professional ■ MS, Anthropology, University of
archaeologist. He has managed all phases of archaeological Oregon, 1998
activities, including surveys, testing, data recovery excavations, ■ MA, English, University of
monitoring, site evaluation, analysis, report preparation, and Oregon, 1990
archival research. ■ BA, History and Geology,
University of Montana, 1981
Prior to joining ICF, Mark managed multiple projects in
southern California, including surveys, testing, data recovery, Professional Memberships
and monitoring projects for numerous federal and state
agencies. These projects involved complex cultural resources ■ Society for American
and compliance issues, as well as budget preparation and Archaeology
tracking, staff coordination, and writing and editing of reports • Society for Ca�ifornia
Archaeology
and Section 106 compliance documents. ■ Register of Professional
Archaeologists
Project Experience
Bat Nha Meditation Center—City of Santa Ana, California Certifications
Served as senior archaeologist. Project included the � Registered Professional
Archaeologist(RPA), No. 11067
archaeological survey and preparation of CEQA
documentation for the proposed Bat Nha temple expansion in TraininglLecture
Santa Ana. Wrote the IS/MND section for the CEQA
doCument. ■ Lithic Analysis
McAllister Ranch Phase 2 Cultural Testing of Sites— Areas of Expertise
Suncal Homes, Bakersfield, California ■ Project Management
Served as principal investigator. Planned and conducted ■ Lithic Material Identification and
Phase II testing and evaluation excavations at five prehistoric Analysis
archaeological sites for this suburban development project.
Developed testing strategy and supervised crew and provided lithic analysis and artifact
identification. Project included coordinating with local Native Americans and Native American
monitors.
Page 1
' Mark Robinson, RPA � Resume
Adelante Eastside Redevelopment Project EIR—Community Redevelopment Agency/LA,
Los Angeles, California
Served as project archaeologist. Conducted review of previous archaeological work within the
redevelopment area, evaluated archaeological sensitivity, and prepared cultural resources and
paleontological resources sections of the project environmental document.
On-Call Section 106 Review—Los Angeles Housing Department, California
Senior archaeologist for Section 106 reviews when the potential for archaeological resources
has been identified. Supervises research and field work, and provides quality review of reports.
Riverside Outdoor Park Improvements IS/MND—City of Los Angeles Department of
Recreation and Parks, California
Served as cultural resources lead. Duties for this project included conducting archaeological
survey and evaluation of the proposed park and preparing the cultural resources section of the
project environmental document. ICF is preparing an IS and MND for a new park in the City of
Los Angeles. The proposed project involves the construction and operation of both active and
passive recreational facilities on an approximately 18-acre site near Elysian Park. It aims to
create opportunities for the local community to recreate, as well as provide a venue that would
increase social interaction between community members.
On-Call Environmental Services—Irvine Ranch Water District, California
Served as senior archaeologist. Analyzed record search results for cultural resources
information and geological maps and geotechnical reports for paleontological resources
information. Wrote the IS/MND section for the Orange Park Acres water distribution and
transmission system improvements project, an area of 646 acres being added to the District
service area.
IS/MND for New Evans Reservoir—City of Riverside Public Utilities Department,
California
Served as project archaeologist. Conducted a record search and Phase I survey of the project
area and assessed the potential for the project area to contain subsurface prehistoric and
historical archaeological deposits. Prepared an IS/MND section for cultural resources, including
paleontology. Additional pipeline routes added to the project required further survey and report
revisions.
CEQA Documentation for Multiple Communications Tower Replacement Projects—DGS
Real Estate Services Division and CAL FIRE, Southern California
Served as archaeologist. Project involved the archaeological survey and preparation of CEQA
documentation for the proposed replacement of existing communication towers at three sites—
IS/ND for Boucher Hill in Palomar Mountain State Park, IS/ND for Cuyamaca Peak in Rancho
Cuyamaca State Park, and IS/MND and technical studies for Strawberry Peak in San
Bernardino County. Also coordinated interagency cultural resources reports between CAL FIRE,
the Forest Service, DPR, and the Real Estate Services Division.
Page 2
Shannon Hatcher � Resume _ �
SHANNON HATCHER
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analyst
Shannon Hatcher is an air quality climate change, and noise Years of Experience
project manager with extensive experience in emissions
inventory development, environmental impact analysis, report � Professional start date: 12I2000
preparation, and environmental noise monitoring. He manages • �CF start date: 12I2000
and prepares air quality, climate change, and noise studies for
a variety of transportation, infrastructure, planning, and other Education
development projects. Shannon's lead responsibilities include ■ BS, Environmental Science,
field investigations, modeling assessments, impact analysis, Oregon State university,
mitigation, strategies and report preparation, and analysis and Corvallis, Oregon, 2000
document peer review and QA/QC. ■ BS, Environmental Health and
Safety, Oregon State Universety,
Shannon's areas of expertise include point-, area-, and mobile- Corvallis, Oregon, 2000
source air quality impact studies; air quality conformity
analyses; air quality dispersion modeling; air quality health risk Special Training
assessments; air quality permitting support; analyses of air ■ Air Toxics Health Risk
quality regulations; emission inventory development; mitigation Assessment and Hotspots
strategy identification and quantification; greenhouse gas Analysis and Reporting
Program, BlueScape
(GHG) inventory; GHG impact assessment; and training. He Environmental and Dillingham
also provides impact analysis of noise and vibration from Software Engineering, Inc
transportation, construction, industrial, and other sources; and ■ FHWA Workshop on Project��
field investigations. He conducts field investigations and noise �evel Mobile Source Air Tox�cs,
measurements to document ambient and source noise levels, Federal Highway Administraeion
identify noise sensitive receivers, and assess physical ■ AERMOD Modeling for Permits
feasibility of noise mitigation and abatement. Interprets local • Advanced AERMOD and
noise elements and ordinances to establish noise significance Practical CaIPufF, BEE-�ine
thresholds under CEQA. Modeling and quantification of noise Software
■ EPA Project-Level Training for
from transportation, industrial, construction, and other sources. Quantitative PM Hot-Spot
Application of inethodology and criteria under standards Analyses-MOVES
established by local, state, and federal agencies, including ■ EPA Project-Level Training for
Caltrans, FHWA, and FTA, to evaluate noise and vibration Quantitative PM Hot-Spot
impacts and mitigation/abatement. Analyses- EMFAC
Project Experience
Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project (Redlands First Mile Project) —San
Bernardino Association of Governments/HDR Engineering, Redlands, California
Assisted in preparation and provided senior peer review of air quality and climate change
analysis for extension of Metrolink service from the existing San Bernardino Metrolink
Station/Santa Fe Depot to new rail platforms at the future location of the San Bernardino Transit
Center (SBTC) and Transit Village, in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County,
California. Discussed existing air quality conditions; existing emission sources in the project
area; future air quality trends; current status of air quality management planning, including
Page 1
' Shannon Hatcher � Resume
current exceedances of federal and state air quality standards; state and federal air regulations;
used the EMFAC2007, CALINE-4, and SCREEN3 models to evaluate air impacts associated
with con-struction and operation of project facilities; evaluated health risks and regional and
project-level (carbon monoxide and particulate matter) conformity in compliance with FTA and
EPA requirements; identification of air quality impacts resulting from the proposed project; and
identification of mitigation measures.
QA/QC Review of Administrative Draft EIR TTI Grain Export Terminal Installation
Project and QA/QC Review of Pier S Marine Terminal and Backchannel
Improvement Project EIS/EIR—Port of Long Beach, California.
Senior Peer Review. ICF is providing independent 3rd-party review of environmental documents
prepared for the Port of Long Beach and USACE. ICF is providing environmental strategy
guidance, reviewing consultant work products, researching environmental document precedent,
coordinating with resource agencies, and providing technical input on impacts and mitigation
related to the air quality and climate change analysis prepared for the projects' environmental
documents. The peer review of consultant work products conducted for this project is similar to
the POWS' request for peer review and QA/QC assistance.
Mockingbird Canyon to Harford Springs Regional Trail—Riverside County Regional Park
and Open Space District, Riverside, California
Air Quality Analyst. Peer reviewed the air quality and climate change technical reports. The
project proposes the development of a regional multi-purpose, non-motorized trail in Western
Riverside County.
Weimar-Applegate-Colfax Community Plan EIR Air Quality Analysis—Placer County,
California
Air Quality Analyst. Prepared program-level assessment of air impacts associated with updating
the Weimar-Applegate-Colfax community plan. This consisted of discussion of existing air
quality condition in the plan area based on published monitoring data; discussion of existing
emission sources in the plan area; discussion of future air quality trends; discussion of the
current status of air quality management planning, including current exceedances of federal and
state air quality standards; discussion of the state and federal air regulations; discussion of
general types of impacts expected to occur from construction as a result of updating the
community plan; and identification of mitigation measures.
Horseshoe Bar/Penryn and Granite Bay Community Plan Update EIR Air Quality
Analysis—Placer County, California
Air Quality Analyst. Prepared program-level assessment of air impacts associated with updating
the Horseshoe Bar/Penryn and Granite Bay community plan. This consisted of discussion of
existing air quality condition in the plan area based on published monitoring data; discussion of
existing emission sources in the plan area; discussion of future air quality trends; discussion of
the current status of air quality management planning, including current exceedances of federal
and state air quality standards; discussion of the state and federal air regulations; discussion of
general types of impacts expected to occur from construction as a result of updating the
community plan; and identification of mitigation measures.
Page 2
Peter Hardie � Resume _ •
PETER HARDIE
Noise Analyst
Peter Hardie has experience in acoustical analysis for a wide Years of Experience
array of projects, including transportation, residential
development, master plan development, and rail projects ■ Professional start date: 0112005
throughout southern California. He has conducted and ■ ICF start date: 0112005
participated in noise and vibration analyses for numerous
transportation, commercial, industrial, and residential Education
development projects throughout California. Peter is also
experienced in modeling existing and future conditions to ■ MESM, Environmental Sciencs
determine potential project-related noise impacts using the and Management, University nf
FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM�). He conducts railroad noise California, Santa Barbara, 2004
modeling using the methods developed for the FTA and FRA. ■ BA, Environmental Science,
Peter is also experienced in environmental planning, Rollins College, 1999
enVironmental analysis, and impact assessments for -
transportation and development projects subject to CEQA. Professional Development
■ FHWA TNM�2.5 Training Course
Project Experience ■ Principles of Acoustics
Supplemental EIR 1278/EIR 1716 for the Santiago Hills II ■ Environmental Noise Analysis
and East Orange Planned Communities—The Irvine ■ INCE Member
Company, Orange County, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Assisted in writing the environmental documents for a
proposed project area for the Santiago Hills II and East Orange Planned Communities
occupying approximately 6,800 acres at the eastern edge of the City of Orange. The project's
land use components consisted of residential, recreational, commercial, and open space uses.
Peters Canyon Regional Park Restroom Project—Orange County Public Works,
California
Served as noise analyst and author. Conducted noise analyses of proposed removal of an
existing restroom facility and reconstruction of a new permanent facility located in Peters
Canyon as part of ICF's on-call environmental consulting contract. Noise analyses included
analyzing construction related noise and vibration levels at sensitive receptors surrounding the
proposed project sites. The analysis was used in support of the IS/MND CEQA document.
Orange County Parks Maintenance Facility—Orange County Public Works/Orange
County Planning, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Conducted noise analyses of proposed demolition and
construction of buildings within Irvine Regional Park on-call environmental consulting contract.
Noise analyses included analyzing construction related noise and vibration levels at sensitive
receptors surrounding the proposed project sites. The analysis was used in in support of the
IS/MND CEQA document.
IS/MND for 200 East First American Way, The Met at South Coast Multifamily Residential
Project—City of Santa Ana, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Conducted noise analyses of proposed multifamily
residential building within the City of Santa Ana. Noise analyses included taking noise
measurements, and analyzing construction related noise and vibration levels at sensitive
Pa+�e 1
� Peter Hardie ( Resume
receptors as well as operational noise levels to surrounding noise sensitive receptors as well as
to the project. The analysis was used in support of the IS/MND CEQA document.
Buddhist Temple EIR—City of Santa Ana, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Conducted noise analyses of proposed expansion of a
Buddhist temple located within the City of Santa Ana. Noise analyses included taking noise
measurements, and analyzing construction related noise and vibration levels at sensitive
receptors as well as operational noise levels to surrounding noise sensitive receptors as well as
to the project. The analysis was used in support of the IS/MND CEQA document.
SR 91 Auxiliary Lanes Construction—Orange County Transportation Authority/Daniel,
Mann, Johnson, and Mendenhall Harris, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Conducted noise analysis for a highway widening in the
County of Orange, in coordination with Caltrans District 8. The analyses included modeling
noise-sensitive receptors using ambient noise measurements from HDR. CAD files provided by
the project engineers were used to design noise models for existing, future no-project, and
future with project conditions, which were analyzed using the FHWA's TNM�Version 2.5.
Summarized changes from the in-future traffic noise levels resulting from proposed geometric
changes to the proposed alignment, as well as future traffic volume increases and any proposed
mitigation, in a noise technical report.
Wilmington Waterfront EIR—Port of Los Angeles, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Conducted noise analysis as part of ICF's on-call
environmental consulting contract with the Port of Los Angeles. Noise analysis included noise
measurements measuring ambient conditions at sensitive receptors surrounding the proposed
project sites and designing noise models using the FHWA's TNM�Version 2.5 to assess
changes in future tra�c noise levels resulting from proposed geometric changes to the
proposed alignment, as well as future traffic volume increases to existing noise-sensitive land
uses and proposed on-site receptors (proposed park). Additionally, noise analysis included
analysis of construction noise and operational noise (such as noise impacts to park users from
existing "peake�" power plants and existing rail traffic). Summarized the results of the noise
studies in noise technical reports and related CEQA documents.
California Health Care Facility Environmental Document—California Prison Health Care
Receivership/URS-BLL JV, Chino, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Conducted noise analyses for low-density in a residential
community with commercial and recreational land use components. Noise analysis included
noise measurements of ambient conditions and traffic noise impact analysis to estimate
potential noise effects at both existing noise-sensitive land uses and proposed on-site receptors.
Summarized the results of the noise studies in noise technical reports and the EIR.
EIR for State Enterprise Zone—City of Los Angeles Community Development
Department, California
Served as noise analyst and author. Wrote the EIR section on noise. ICF prepared the EIR for
the state enterprise zone project. The proposed project involves the implementation of a state
enterprise zone designation for the Central, East Valley, and Hollywood areas in the City of Los
Angeles to provide a business incentive zone designed to attract new business and retain
existing businesses and jobs. The project would permit businesses located within the zone to
take state tax credits and deductions and City benefits, including an LADWP electric rate
subsidy. The zone designation, in and of itself, would not result in any specific construction
projects, land acquisition projects, or other development projects. As a result of ICF's efforts, the
City expected and received final approval of the state enterprise zone designation from the
California Department of Housing and Community Development.
Page 2
Tanya Jones � Resume _ '
TANYA JONES
CEQA Task Leader and Environmental Planning
Technical Support
Years of Experience
Tanya Jones is trained in environmental analysis and design. Professional start date:04/2008
She has more than seven years of experience preparing
CEQA and NEPA documents and coordinating between project ICF start date: 04/2008
managers and technical specialists to complete legally
defensible environmental documents. Tanya has served as Education
deputy project manager, project coordinator, and BA, Environmental Analysis and
environmental planner/author for a wide range of projects Design, University of California,
including commercial, residential, redevelopment, infill Irvine, 2005
development, solar, transportation, and utility projects.
Professional Memberships
Project Experience Association of Environmental
Planners
2152-2182 Alton IBC Mixed Product Residential Project—
City of Irvine, California Professional Development
Currently serving as project manager and author for the
preparation of an IS and Addendum to the IBC Vision Plan and QSPIQSD Training, C�M
Mixed Use Zoning Code for the redevelopment of a 10.23 acre Professional Services, 2014 __
site with a mix of 93 townhome units and a 264-unit apartment complex. The project site is
currently two parcels developed with two one-story, multi-tenant structures providing
approximately 10,270 square feet of office uses and 192,220 square feet of industrial uses.
Surrounding uses include primarily mixed commercial and industrial area, with some residential
uses interspersed within a few blocks. The proposed project involves subdividing the two
parcels into seven lots, demolition of the finro existing buildings and parking lot, and
redevelopment of the site with a mix of 93 townhome units and 264 apartment units. The
entitlement process includes application of State Density Bonus provisions and State-adopted
parking rates, a Conditional Use Permit, a Transfer of Development Rights, an Affordable
Housing Plan, a Park Plan, and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map. As part of the project, ICF is
also preparing a residential compatibility analysis and health risk assessment as well as
providing peer review services for the noise and air quality technical studies. Key environmental
issues include air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, land use and planning, public
infrastructure, noise, and traffic.
Pistoia Apartments CEQA Addendum—City af Irvine, California
Served as project manager and author for the preparation of an IS and Addendum to the IBC
Vision Plan and Mixed Use Zoning Code EIR for the redevelopment of a 4.7-acre site with a
371-unit residential complex. The project site is currently developed with two single-story light
industrial buildings and associated parking, and is surrounded by office, manufacturing,
industrial, and residential uses. The proposed project involves demolition of the existing
buildings—approximately 97,766 square feet—and redevelopment of the site with a 371-unit
residential complex. The entitlement process included application of State Density Bonus
provisions and State-adopted parking rates, a Conditional Use Permit, a Transfer of
Development Rights, an Affordable Housing Plan, a Park Plan, and a Vesting Tentative Tract
Map. As part of the project, ICF also prepared a residential compatibility analysis and peer
reviewed the noise, air quality, and health risk assessment technical studies. Key
environmental issues included air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, land use and
planning, public infrastructure, noise, and traffic.
Page 1
Tanya Jones � Resume
Milani Apartments Addendum EIR—City of Irvine, California
Served as project manager and author for the preparation of an IS and Addendum to the IBC
Vision Plan and Mixed Use Zoning Code for the redevelopment of a 3.6-acre site with a 287-unit
condominium development. The site was previously approved for the development of an 82-unit
condominium unit, and in 2010, the City of Irvine identified the 82—unit residential condominium
project as a pending project in the 2010 IBC Vision Plan and Mixed Use Zoning Code Final EIR.
Modifications to the previous project design constitute the "proposed projecY' representing an
increase of 205 units from the previous approval, and demolition of an existing four-story office
building on the site. Key environmental issues include traffic, air quality, noise, aesthetics, land
use and planning, and public infrastructure. Responsibilities as Deputy Project Manager
included managing and maintaining the project schedule and budget, as well as ensuring the
quality of deliverables met the clienYs expectations.
Fusion 360° Multifamily Residential Development IS and Addendum EIR—City of Irvine,
California
Served as project manager and author for the preparation of an IS and Addendum to the IBC
Vision Plan and Mixed Use Zoning Code for the redevelopment of an approximately 3.6-acre
parcel for 280 multi-family residential units. The project site is currently developed with three
industrial buildings occupied by a church, and is surrounded by existing low-rise offices, light
industrial, and residential properties. The proposed project involves demolition of the existing
three industrial buildings and redevelopment of the site with a 280-unit residential complex. Key
environmental issues include traffic, air quality, noise, hazards and hazardous materials, land
use and planning, and public infrastructure. Responsibilities as Deputy Project Manager
included managing and maintaining the project schedule and budget as well as ensuring the
quality of deliverables met the client's expectations.
Baker Ranch Residential IS/MND—City of Lake Forest, California
Served as deputy project manager and author for the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the entitlement of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change,
Tentative Tract Map, and Development Agreement for up to 250 single-family attached and
detached residential units on a 30-acre site in the City of Lake Forest. The existing and
historical uses included storage and operation of a surface mine for aggregate resources as well
as a 74,000 square-foot water quality detention basin. Key environmental issues included air
quality, biological resources, land use, mineral resources, noise, public services, traffic, and
utilities.
Shelby Trust Residential Project EIR—City of Goleta, California
Served as peer reviewer for the Hydrology and Water Quality analysis and response to
hydrology and water quality comments on the Draft EIR. The proposed project involved a
residential development on a former avocado grove, surrounded by existing residential
development and the Glen Annie Golf Course, with the EI Encanto Creek along the west side of
the project site. Key environmental issues addressed in the EIR included impacts to the creek
and riparian habitat, traffic impacts, and visual impacts. The proposed project was considered
controversial because it proposed conversion of agricultural land uses to non-agricultural uses.
Page 2
Elizabeth Irvin � Resume _ `
ELIZABETH IRVIN
Lead Technical Editor
Elizabeth Irvin is a lead technical editor and the Southern Years of Experience
California publications team manager. She specializes in the
editing, document management, and production of CEQA and ■ Professional start date: 0311999
NEPA documents, including EIRs, EISs, ISs, MNDs, EAs, and ■ ICF start date: 1012001
technical specialist reports. Elizabeth manages editing and ---
production teams for large-scale documents for clients such as Education
the cities of Orange, Irvine, and Goleta; Port of Los Angeles,
California High-Speed Rail Authority, Caltrans, U.S. Forest ■ BA, English, University of
Service, and the County of Kern. Elizabeth hires, trains, and California, Irvine, 1998
oversees publications staff in ICF's Irvine, Los Angeles, and
San Diego offices. Professional Development
■ Fundamentals of Technical
Project Experience w�iting, Learning Tree University,
Irvine, California, 2001
EIR and Supporting Studies for East Orange Projects—
City of Orange, California
Served as lead editor. Supervised team of editors and publications specialists and managed the
formatting, editing, and production of the draft EIR, final EIR, and response to comments
documents. Coordinated with editors, writers, and the City of Orange to ensure clarity,
consistency, and accuracy throughout the documents. Attended document review meetings to
facilitate integrating internal comments and edits from various parties.
Multiple Development Projects—The Irvine Company, California
Served as lead editor. Edited construction and mitigation monitoring reports and letter reports
for the Shady Canyon residential and golf course development, Quail Hill residential
development, and Turtle Ridge residential development.
Multiple Addendum EIRs—City of Irvine, California
Served as editor for the following addendums: Milani Apartments Addendum EIR, Pistoia
Apartments CEQA Addendum, and Fusion 360° Multifamily Residential Development IS and
Addendum EIR. Ensured correct spelling, grammar usage, general readability, and consistent
voice. Also responsible for ensuring consistent formatting and accurate pagination, acronym list,
bibliography, and table of contents.
Shelby Trust and Kenwood Village EIRs—City of Goleta, California
Served as support editor. Ensured correct spelling, grammar usage, general readability, and
consistent voice. Also responsible for ensuring consistent formatting and accurate pagination,
acronym list, bibliography, and table of contents.
Tejon Mountain Village EIR—Tejon Mountain Village ��C, Kern County, California
Served as support editor. Performed QC editorial review for an EIR for a mixed-use resort and
retirement community in the Tehachapi Mountains. Ensured correct spelling, grammar usage,
general readability, and consistent voice. Also responsible for ensuring consistent formatting
and accurate pagination, acronym list, bibliography, and table of contents.
Page 1
Elizabeth Irvin ( Resume
General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan—City of Goleta, California
Served as lead editor. Managed the formatting, editing, and production of the plan, which was
written by the City of Goleta Planning Department. Advised the City of Goleta regarding
document design, style guide, and consistency standards.
Frazier Park Estates Draft and Final Recirculated EIR—Fallingstar Homes, Kern County,
California
Served as lead editor. Performed QC editorial review for the draft and final EIR for an 851.5-
acre housing development project adjacent to the Los Padres National Forest near Tejon Pass
on I-5. Ensured correct spelling, grammar usage, general readability, and consistent voice. Also
responsible for ensuring consistent formatting and accurate pagination, acronym list,
bibliography, and table of contents. Organized and collected information for the administrative
record.
Kern County Solar Projects—Kern County, California
Served as lead editor for over 10 EIRs for various solar projects throughout Kern County.
Created start-up materials, style guide, and templates that included boilerplate language and
author instructions. Met with client to discuss client style and document preferences and
procedures. Coordinated with editors, writers, and subconsultants to ensure clarity, consistency,
and accuracy. Ensured consistent formatting and accurate pagination, acronym list,
bibliography, and table of contents.
Northwest Communities EIR—Soper Homes, Bakersfield, California
Served as lead editor. Performed QC editorial review for the draft and final EIR for a housing
development project. Ensured correct spelling, grammar usage, general readability, and
consistent voice. Was also responsible for ensuring consistent formatting and accurate
pagination, acronym list, bibliography, and table of contents. Organized and collected
information for the administrative record.
Rosedale Ranch Project Program EIR—City of Bakersfield, California
Served as lead editor. Performed QC editorial review of an EIR and technical studies for a new
master planned community on approximately 1,655 acres in the northwestern Bakersfield area.
Ensured correct spelling, grammar usage, general readability, and consistent voice. Was also
responsible for ensuring consistent formatting and accurate pagination, acronym list,
bibliography, and table of contents.
Old River Ranch EIR—City of Bakersfield, California
Served as lead editor. Performed QC editorial review for a program EIR and technical studies
for a new master-planned community on 1,853 acres. Ensured correct spelling, grammar usage,
general readability, and consistent voice. Was also responsible for ensuring consistent
formatting and accurate pagination, acronym list, bibliography, and table of contents.
Bikeways Master Plan Program EIR—County of Los Angeles Department of Public
Works, Alhambra, California
Served as lead editor. Created and maintained master templates and style guide. Ensured
correct spelling, grammar usage, general readability, and consistent voice. Coordinated with
editors and writers over the document lifecycle to ensure clarity, consistency, and accuracy
throughout the document. Ensured consistent formatting and accurate pagination, acronym list,
bibliography, and table of contents. The program EIR analyzed the potential for environmental
impacts associated with the proposed plan, which will guide the development and maintenance
of a comprehensive bicycle network and set of programs throughout the County's
unincorporated communities for the next 20 years.
Page 2
Santiago Hills II Project Third-Party Technical Review and CEQA Addendum
Cost Proposal
ICF proposes to provide third-party technical review and a CEQA addendum for a time-and-materials,
not-to-exceed fee of$39,350, as detailed in the attached itemized cost proposal. The billing rates for
the key staff identified in our proposal are shown in the cost proposal and listed below.
Donna McCormick Principal/Project Director $230.00/hour
Chad Beckstrom Principal/Project Director $230.00/hour
Mark Robinson Senior Technical Analyst $200/hour
Greg Hoisington Managing Consultant $190/hour
Shannon Hatcher Managing Consultant $190/hour
Jon (Peter) Hardie Senior Consultant II $150/hour
Tanya lones Senior Consultant I $130.00/hour
Soraya Swiontek Senior Consultant I $130.00/hour
Elizabeth Irvin Editor $85.00/hour
ICF proposes to invoice monthly, on a time-and-materials basis. Invoices are due within 30 days of
receipt.
�l�rch 1, 2CI16 P�ge 1
� g � � � o � n � � � �
� -i N N N � C T7 � y �l f/) y � -I � � -� -i � y
d � � w W � � 4? 7� 7 n � N d N C7 C1 � C7 �
.n. '
'� � c C�JI N "�'� � Qmo S W ^ � N � � � 7yc � F � �
�• x 'O � � m � O > ,�
(�p � � y� fD � y N N C n � d �I � 1.77 ? W IV � S -�
C '� O Q d d
y °� � � 3 cn ci � � � o Z � D (� W < 4' �
wG co � - � � � ^ a o c p �p �
� �' C c �. u� W m �p � � v �' m fJ c o � °�
�cs v ' o 0 3 °' -- 2 3 v y � � v `�• � '�
�. g m � �c .
� p � y � (p N n p� C .� �1 � � N
cD _ � n � y CD ,� (n fD � <
a a � � � �, m D o m � cu
w o � o v�, � `° � v, � v � o � �
y .� U)
N N - 7 fD �p d pl � fD
p � fD N � � C1 fTl N y p. a
G� 7 �p N 7 N � 3 �7
a � �. N � y a � � •-�'
W C � � � � y' d O S?o Sp
b�y- � � C n � (=/7 � � 7 7
�1 7 � � � .� j ^d v N
d � v m � a m v -- ^
� v
.�
y � � .�` .�. � n n
O N � � _•
f�
y � p� � 7 � �7 � 3
..�-. I_
fD -��. � � ^ fn cp �
in 3 =- � co � n�i �i o a
� m _, m � � � n � �
0
cv �_ " � v�, �. m Sy
y � c° a; � m �
� v a�i
— o � �
' v � m m �
�
o �v ° v � (7
o � � o � � � � � N
W N 0 ° � Q ,.t
O O � N ? 1 cn � m
........................................................................................................................... N
� � �
� o � o n �
� � p o
0 co fD S31
O O O�o N Oo � A Oo � � � � (p
,,,,,...�......................���..�..................,..,.�...............,,.,.,.,,...,�.,�....,.,.,.............,,,...... Q
C� p ` �
� � � j �
� � _ � c rn � C�
� p �
A �
W rn � ? � � D � �
O O OD N � O -
.......................�...............................,,..,...................,.,,,,,...........,,,.,.,..............,,,,,,
2 �
(7 W o 1+
O vi
'b0� V � C � tp �� O
n �
� .� K
C O O CNl� N N � O � (7
c9 ............................................................................................................................ D O �
� (� D �
a � N
� N m -� � � � �
�• rfl .� m m � a, � V�
a o o � � � o � �° �
� o o � iv � w � N
�
................ _ 2 � �
� ..................................................................................................... o
� n n D v �
�
�» � � � fJ o (�
`r � � v� � v � � O
O O A N N OD N C � `� � Z
............................................................................................................................ �
� S fA
� � z v _
N �
E� 7 �n fD ,�
O O U� N � N ,C.. � ` 1
............................................................................................................................ �
� � �•
f�
Efl 7 ? �/�
w � y � `I
n �
O O O N Oo '. � (p m
� D
f,9 � Ei9 69 EA Efl Efl 69 EA �
� � � N N "' � � D
p� O
N O ? O fA ? O N ONo O O A !A N C.
O O O O O O O O O O O O O - a
�
m �
C] � n. � fl-
o N � C
`�` � � r� � ° a 3
�-�n�., O Cn A 0� � n
w O
� � 7
� C �
I T � � O �'
N �q
I� A b9 OD � ffl 69 V� Efl ffl fA i-A (� ffl �
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a
c�'c r
a °1
� �
I O�o O�i U�i W � � E,a N <H &9 tn �
� � � �
n W � W � Oe OO CT N m (D W O
y � O N Q1 EA A O N OD O O ? 69 p�
�^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O -
O
N
N
,o m
� � o
� � ��' � � � y
m
p C�O (�O O O �
'�! O O O O
m �
O
ffl �
W �
�
W Q�
(T fD
O