Loading...
ORD-14-82 INCREASES THE PERIOD OF VALIDATION FROM 18 MONTHS TO 24 MONTHSORDINANCE NO. 14- 82 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE AMENDING SECTION l7.86.l70( B)OF THE PRESENT ORANGE MUNICIPAL CODE AND COMPARABLE SECTION 17.92.140(B) OF THE PROPOSED REVISION OF THE ORANGE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE THE PERIOD OF VALIDATION FROM EIGHTEEI~ MONTHS (1 1/2 YEARS) TO TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS (2 YEARS) FOR APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES. AMENDMENT 3-82 CITY OF ORANGE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heretofore has held a duly advertised pUblic hearing on the hereinafter described amendment to the Orange Municipal Code and has recommended to the City Council, by ResolutionNo. PC- 36-82, approval thereof; and WHEREAS, Section 17.86.170(B) of the Orange Municipal Code and Section 17.92.140(B) of the proposed revision to the Orange Municipal Code are both entitled, "Revocation of Variances and Conditional Use Permits" and now read as follows:B. Every variance or conditional use permit issued after the effective date of this section shall become void unless the use or construction has begun within eighteen months after the date the variance or conditional use permit was approved.The Planning Commission may, upon written request prior to expiration, extend the length of time of an approved variance or conditional use permit upon presentation of extenuating circumstances."WHEREAS, the words "eighteen months" is proposed to be changed in both the OrangeMunicipalCodeandproposedzoningordinancetoread " twenty-four months (2 years)"; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature passed AB 612 amending Section 66452.6 of the Government Code, extending the life of a tentative map from eighteen months to two years. Since many conditional use permits and variances are processedtogetherforaproject, it is felt that the time period for these approvals should have the same period of validation; and WHEREAS, the eighteen months allowed by Section 17.86.170(B)of the Municipal Code and Section 17.92.140(B) of the proposed zoning ordinance doesnotprovideapplicantswithsufficienttimetoutilizethevariances or conditional use permits granted; and WHEREAS, the twenty- four months would be a more reasonable period of timethaneighteenmonthsforapplicantstoutilizetheirvariancesa~ d conditional use permits as well as considerably reduce City administrative time now WHEREAS, !La one spoke in support or opposition to the proposedordinanceamenament.. NOW, THER~FORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: section 1 7 .. 86..1 7 0 ( B) of the present Or ange Munic ipal Code shall be amend ed to read as follows: B. Every variance or conditional use permit issued after the effective date of this section shall become void unless the use or construction has begun within twenty-four months after the date the variance or conditional use permit was approved.The Planning Commission may, upon written request prior to expiration, extend the length of time of an approved variance or conditional use permit upon presentation of extenuating circum- stances." Section17..92.140 (B) of the proposed reV1Slon to the Orange Municipal code shall be amended to read as follows:B. Every variance or conditional use permit issued after the effective date of this section shall become void unless the use or construction has begun within twenty-four months after the date the variance or conditional use permit was approved.The Planning Commission may, upon written request prior to expiration, extend the length of time of an approved variance or conditional use permit upon presentation of extenuating circumstances." SECTION II:This ordinance shall be published once within fifteen (15)days after its passage in the Orange City News, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Orange, and shall take effect thirty (30) days from and after the date of its final pass age.ADOPTED th is 2Stll day of May 1982. STATE OF CAL:r FORN IA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s s CITY OF ORANG E ) I, MARILYN J. JENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Orange,California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at the regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18th day of May , 1982, and thereafter at a regular meeting of said CI ty Council duly held on the 1.2t1l. day of ~ Mav , 1~82, was duly passed and adoptedEY--the follOWlng vote, to WIt:AYES: COUNCILMEN: Smith, Barrera, Mayor Beam, Perez, Beyer NOES: COUNC ILMEN : None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None WITNESS my hand and seal this 26th day ofMrlY 1982.7},l } /') . "\Iii zI'. -t/l L. :h/f, ,,>-~C '- ,,/t"::'l/t ,/~./~::"/ Mar ilyn J '(?Jenserr /"City Clerk of the City of Orange 3- CITY NEWS: Ple.ase publish Wednesday, June 2, 1982 only and send PROOF D PROOF OF PUBLICATION to City Clerk, 300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA. 92666 Marilyn J. Jensen, City Clerk LEGAL NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. 14-82 DINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE AMENDING SECTION 17.86. 170 (B)PRESENT ORANGE MUNICIP.AI, CODE AND COMPARABLE SECTION 1 7 .92. 140 (B) OF THE ED REVISION OF THE ORANGE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE THE PERIOD OF VALIDATION IGHTEEN MONTHS (1.. 1/ 2 YEARS) TO TWEl\'TY -FOUR MONTHS (2YEARS) FOR APPROVED IONAL USE PERMIT'S AND VARIANCES."Original Copy on File in City Clerk's Office)5:lis ordinance:changes the zoning ordinance to read "unless the use or con-ruction has begun within twenty-four months after the date the variance conditional use. permit ' Was approved."by the City COl.m.cil ofthe City of Orange at a regular meeting held Tuesday,1982, by the following vote:AYES: Smith,. Barrera, Mayor Beam, Perez, Beyer CITY OF ORANGE Marilyn J. Jensen, City Clerk u _ 'uuv 1.!. 00 J.1V l. Jo..,./<;;;;I;,;.JI ....."".".1::"...... "" '-~o...t . u:n:o- --I:" ~ J. J. \";(;U; J:.&. c ,,' '-' '-" 1..U coo;:: 1-101.. J\.;:' . lol.!. lo 0 .... .... J.yetapplicat ionsare now pending or may be filed in the lm~ed~a te future to convert, to other than mobile home J?ark uses, eXl~tlng obile home par ks wi th in the Ci ty 4> Unless thIS. urgency o~d Inance 1S enacted prohibiting such activity of converSIon o~ mobIle home parks, the danger exists that further erosion of moblle home park