HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023 PC 34-22 WILLIAN DUNSTON, DSEA, INC. APPEAL NO. 0560-22 DESIGN REVIEW NO. 5077-22APPEAL NO.0560-22
DESIGN REVIEW NO.5077-22
RESOLUTION NO. PC 34-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ORANGE DENYING APPEAL NO. 0560-22 AND APPROVING
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 5077-22 TO CONSTRUCT A NEW DUPLEX
UNIT LOCATED AT 529 S. GRAND STREET
APPLICANT: WILLIAM DUNSTON, DSEA, INC.
Moved by Vice Chair Glasgow and seconded by Commissioner Simpson that the
following Resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Section 17.08.050.A authorizes any final
action taken by the Design Review Committee to be appealed to the Planning Commission.
OMC Section 17.0 8.050.E authorizes the Planning Commission to conduct a hearing and take
action on such appeals; and
WHEREAS, Design Review No. 5077-22 was filed by William Dunston, DSEA, Inc. for
the construction of a 1,102 sq. ft. duplex with an attached 227 sq. ft. garage at 529 S. Grand
Street in accordance with the provisions of the OMC; and
WHEREAS, Design Review No. 5077-22 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by state and local law; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2022, the Design Review Committee reviewed Design
Review No. 5077-22 and approved the application subject conditions and findings; and
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2022, Appeal No. 0560-22 was filed by Arianna Barrios,
appealing the Design Review Committee's approval to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the staff report
and backup documentation, the grounds for the appeal and accepted public testimony at a public
hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission denies Appeal
No. 0560-22 and approves Design Review No. 5077-22 to construct a new 1,102 sq. ft. duplex
with an attached 227 sq. ft. garage located at 529 S. Grand Street. The denial of the Appeal and
approval of the proj ect are based on the following findings:
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 34-22
Page 2
SECTION I - FINDINGS
Design Review
1. In the Old Towne Historic District, the proposed work conforms to the prescriptive
standards and design criteria referenced and/or recommended by the DRC or other
reviewing body for the project (OMC 17.10.070. G.1).
The proposed project is in conformance with the Historic Preservation Design Standards
for Old Towne, which are the prescriptive design criteria for projects within the Old
Towne Historic District. The second unit is compatible with the mass, scale, and setbacks
of the existing building, and the roof forms are consistent with the surrounding houses in
the neighborhood. The second unit would be minimally visible from the street and will
not affect the appearance of the historic district. Traditional building materials in the
windows are used and compatible with the historic district. The new unit is subtly
differentiated from the original primary residence by its slab on grade construction, fiber
cement siding, and vertical gable roof vent detail.
2. In any National Register Historic District, the proposed work complies with the Secretary
of the Interior's standards and guidelines (OMC 17.10.070.G.2).
Projects located in the Old Towne Historic District must comply with the Historic
Preservation Design Standards for Old Towne. As described above, the proposed work
conforms with these design standards.
3. The project design upholds community aesthetics through the use of an internally
consistent, integrated design theme and is consistent with all adopted specific plans,
applicable design standards, and their required findings (OMC 17.10.070.F.3).
Projects located in the Old Towne Historic District must comply with the Historic
Preservation Design Standards for Old Towne. As described above, the proposed work
conforms with these design standards. The architecture, scale and massing of the
proposed unit facilitates the integration of the new unit with the original residence and
overall site. The roof forms, fenestration, and materials are also compatible with the
historic residence and garage. The project is not located in a specific plan area.
There is no specific plan or applicable design standards applicable to this property.
4. For infill residential development, as specified in the City of Orange Infill Residential
Design Guidelines, the new structure(s) or addition are compatible with the scale,
massing, orientation, and articulation of the surrounding development and will preserve
or enhance existing neighborhood character (OMC 17.10.070. G. 4).
The new duplex unit is minimally visible from the street and is compatible with the scale
of surrounding development. It is subordinate to the existing historic building and would
continue to maintain a generally low FAR for the property compared to the adjacent
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 34-22
Page 3
buildings in the vicinity. The scale and massing of the structure, combined with the roof
plan and fenestration are consistent with surrounding neighborhood character.
SECTION 2 — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Categorical Exemption: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines 15303 (Class 3 —
New Construction), because it consists of construction of a new duplex residential unit resulting
in a total number of units below the maximum allowable in the Low Medium Density
Residential General Plan land use designation (6-15 dwelling units per acre) and Duplex
Residential (R-2-6) zoning district, and is in an area where public facilities and services are
available.
SECTION 3— CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following conditions are imposed with the
recommendation of approval:
1. This project is approved as a precise plan. All work shall conform in substance and be
maintained in general conformance with the plans (attached to the DRC staff report dated
October 5, 2022 and in the project case file), including modifications required by the
conditions of approval, and as recommended for approval by the Design Review
Committee. Any changes from the approved plans shall be subject to subsequent review
and approval by the Design Review Committee.
2. After any application has been approved, if changes are proposed regarding the location
or alteration of any use or structure, a changed plan may be submitted to the Community
Development Director for approval. If the Community Development Director determines
that the proposed change complies with the provisions and the spirit and intent of the
approval action, and that the action would have been the same for the changed plan as for
the approved plan, the Community Development Director may approve the changed plan
without requiring a new public meeting.
3. The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its officers, agents
and employees from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City
arising out of its approval of this permit, save and except that caused by the City's active
negligence.
4. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, including all City
regulations. Violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for
revocation of this permit.
5. The final approved conditions of approval shall be reprinted on the first or second page of
the construction documents when submitting to the Building Division for the plan check
process.
Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC 34-22
Page 4
6. Construction permits shall be obtained for all future construction work, as required by the
City of Orange, Public Works Department's Building Division. Failure to obtain the
required building permits will be cause for revocation of this permit.
7. If not utilized, project approval expires 24 months from the approval date. Extensions of
time may be granted in accordance with OMC Section 17.08.060.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted on January 16, 2023, by the
Planning Commission of the City of Orange by the following vote:
AYES: Simpson, Vazquez, Glasgow and Trapesonian
NOES: Martinez
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
David uez, Planning Commission Chair
A
Date