Loading...
RES-7890 Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 1922-91RESOLUTION )J(). 7890 A RESOLUTION 01' THE CITY COUNCIL 01' THE CITY 01' ORANGE GRANTING APPEAL )J(). 390 MID APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RO. 1922- 91.APPBLLANT: MIGUEL A. BIZBNGA WHEREAS, the city Zoning Administrator of the City of Orange did receive an application for a conditional use permit from Miguel A. Eizenga (Taqueria El Guerito) to allow on-premise sale of beer and wine in conjunction with operation of an existing restaurant upon certain real property located within the city of orange, county of Orange, state of California, legally described as:2815 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA, 92669; and WHEREAS, the City Zoning Administrator did hold a public hearing upon said application at the City Hall in the City of Orange, notices of which public hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 17,Chapter 17.94 of the Orange Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said Zoning Administrator, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by herself and in her behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did deny application for Conditional Use Permit No. 1922-91 for the following reasons:1. The establishment was more like a "fast food"outlet rather than a bonafide restaurant, which would allow patrons to purchase the food with the beer and wind and take it to go.2. The ease of purchasing beer and wine to go will cause deterioration of bordering properties and create special problems for the surrounding area.3. The ease of purchasing beer and wine to go will have an adverse effect upon the adjacent businesses and the residential neighborhood to the north.WBBREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,applicant filed Appeal No. 390, causing the review of said Zoning Administrator action at a duly noticed WHBRBAS, at the time and place fixed for said public hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard and did receive evidence and reports; and WHBRBAS, the City Council finds, after careful consideration of the recommendations of the city zoning Administrator and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, that: 1. The proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Orange Municipal Code. 2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the city of Orange. 6. The conditions of approval as well as regulations of the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Department will adequately restrict the availability of the beer and wine as well as its place of consumption so as to minimize any potential impacts on the neighborhood. ROW, THBREFORE, BB IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orange that, for the reasons hereinabove stated, Appeal No. 390 is hereby granted and Conditional Use Permit No. 1922-91 is hereby approved permitting on-premise sale of beer and wine in conjunction with the operation of an existing restaurant on the hereinabove described real property, subject to the following conditions:1. All alcoholic beverages shall be consumed entirely within the restaurant building, and not in the outdoor 2. The business shall be maintained as a bona- fide restaurant. 3. All Alcoholic Beverage Control requirements shall be complied with. 4. If not utilized, Conditional Use permit 1922- 91 shall expire two years from the approval date. BB IT PURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. ADOPTBD this 19th day of November 1991. ATTEST: ctt/1(~~~~~~ge I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the city Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of November , 1991, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: STEINER, BARRERA, COONTZ COUNCIL MEMBERS: MAYOR BEYER, SPURGEON COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE Y of orangeC1.ty Cler dg 3-Reso No. 7890