RES-7809 Conditional Use Permit Approval No. 1890-91RESOLUTION NO. 7809
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ORANGE UPHOLDING DESIGN REVIEW$
ACTION ON DRB PROJECT NO. 2640 AND
UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION BY
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1890-
91 FOR TRANSITIONAL GROUP HOME FOR WOMEN
AND CHILDREN AT 357-371 SOUTH
LEMON STREET AND DENYING DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD APPEAL NO. 1-91 AND
PLANNING COMMISSION
APPEAL NO. 385.ORANGE
COUNTY
RESCUE MISSION Recitals:The Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. PC-8-91 on March 4, 1991, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 1890-91 to permit the construction of
a group home facility upon property situated in the R-4
District at 357-
371 South Lemon Street; more particularly described as:Property A at 357 South
Lemon- Lots 17 and 18 of Block B,McCoy Addition to
the City of Orange, Book 15, pages 15-17 Property B at 371
South Lemon - Lot 16 of Block B, McCoy Addition to
the city of Orange, Book 15, pages 15-
17 The
Old Towne Preservation Association filed two appeals.These were:1.
Design Review Board Appeal No. 01-91 alleging that the
subject project (DRB Project No. 2640) approved by the Design Review Board
on December 19, 1990 was not consistent with Old Towne
Guidelines because the design was not in a pre-1940 architectural
style
and the structure would be out of context with the
neighborhood.2. Appeal No. 385 requesting that the Planning commission be
overruled and Conditional Use Permit No. 1890 be denied because the mass,
scale and density of
the proposed structure would be out of context with the neighborhood.
This matter came before the City
Council on April 16, 1991,and the following facts were determined:
1. The proposed structure would be a 2-story, 14,984
square foot building designed in the Craftsman Style and
would have a low pitched roof, wide clapboard siding
and stone detailing.2. The structure would provide temporary
housing for 20 adult women and their children, along
with resident managers,under the sponsorship of the Orange County Rescue Mission.
NOW,
of Orange that the action of the Planning Commission to approve
Conditional Use Permit No. 1890-91 be upheld and Appeal No. 385
be denied for the following
reasons:1. The group home facility, providing transitional
housing for women and children, is a use which will benefit
the
community.2. The building design is consistent with the Old
Towne Design
Guidelines.3. The size of the building and the number of
residents proposed are reasonable and consistent with the type of
the development allowed in the R-4 (Residential,
Maximum Multiple
Family) district.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit
No. 1890-91 be granted subject to
the following conditions:1. Except for the qualified resident manager(
s), occupancy of this "House of Hope" shall be restricted
to those screened applicants meeting the established criteria as
stated by Orange
county Rescue Mission.2. The use of this facility shall be limited to
20 adult women and their children under the age of 12
years. Maximum occupancy including two resident managers shall be 47
persons. The maximum stay for residents shall
be 18 months.3. Any change in client criteria,
screening standards or expansion and/or expiration of use shall require
a new conditional use permit and full review. Quarterly reporting
of occupancy in conformance with Condition No.2, to the
Department of community Development
shall be required.4. Final project shall be in
substantial conformance
with approved plans.5. The applicant shall submit landscaping
and irrigation plans to the Design Review
Board for approval.6. That the building elements and material
match in quality and type as used on Old Towne residential structures
such as wood or vinyl clad wood double or single hung, or
windows and
individual lap siding.7. That the applicant submit a grading plan
to the Public Works Department for approval, and pay
appropriate
fees as required.8. Common property line between project
parcels shall be eliminated in a manner approved by the Department
of Public Works.9. Lighting shall be installed in such a
manner that direct glare of illumination shall be confined
to
10. Encompass City of Orange Security Ordinance No. 7-
79 within plan set for plan CCC
review.11. All fencing surrounding the yard areas, shall be
approved by the Police Department and Design Review
Board.12. Exterior lighting relating to the parking lot,
all access ways and walkways to and from, as well as the yard
area,including all accessways and walkways, shall be installed
and maintained as required by the Security Ordinance, as approved
by the Police
Department.13. A photometric printout of this project showing
the light levels by use of "point to point" or "contour"
analysis.Please include the information data sheet with these
photometries to show the type of luminaire, mounting height, and wattage
of bulb used for
analysis.14. All illuminated address number of at least 8
inches,contrasting to the background be placed upon the structure
so that it is visible/legible to approaching vehicles, as
approved by the Police Department. Actual location may be specified
by the Police
Department.15. All unit doors to each indivdual suite will be
required to have a 180 degree door viewer, not to be mounted moe than
58 inches from the bottom of the
door.16. All exit doors shall be openable from the
inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or
effort.Manually operated edge or surface mounted flush bolts and
surface bolts are
prohibited.
17.
equipment
etc.).A dry chemical system shall be installed over
cooking if grease-laden vapors are produced (
fryers, broilers,18. The Fire Department connection shall not be
affixed to the building. The Fire Department connection must be
located at least 40 feet away from the building, within 40 feet of
a fire hydrant, and 0 the address of
the building.19. Provide one on-site fire hydrant and
mains capable of supplying the required fire flow. The hydrant
model and on-site location shall be approved by the Fire
Department and have a three (3) foot minimum clearan~e around
the circumference of the fire hydrant. The on-site hydrant shall
not be controlled by the control valve (P.I.V.) for the
sprinkler system so that water flow to hydrants is not impaired
should the sprinkler system be shut down for any reasons. U.F.C. 10.206
and 10.301 Plans Must be
submitted to the Building Department.20. An approved fire
sprinkler system must be installed throughout the building per O.M.C. 15.32.
080 Section 10.306(a).The system shall be designed per N.F.P.A. 13,
U.B.C. Chapter 38 and U.B.C. Standard 38-1.
The
supervision.
21.
for every
distance.
One 2A 10BC rated fire extinguisher
3000 square feet of the building or
U.F.C. standard 10-
1.shall be
provided 75 feet of
travel 22. Provide a fire alarm system as required per U.F.
C.Article 14. Plans must be submitted to the Building
Department.23. Provide a fire extinguisher systems for the
kitchen hood and duct. Plans must be submitted to Building
Department.24. A Fire Department approved key box for Fire
Department access shall be installed in a location approved by the
Fire Department and shall contain keys to gain access to
each building. O.M.C. 15.32.100 and U.F.C. 10.
209.25. Fire facility fees will be
required.26. TSIP fees will be required in accordance with
City
Ordinance.27. Within 15 days of the approval of this project,
the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division
a cashiers check payable to the County Clerk in an amount
required to fulfill the fee requirements of Fish and Game Code
section 711.4(d) (2) and the County administrative fee, to enable to
the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public Resources Code section 21152 14 Cal. Code of Regulations
15075.If the Planning Commission determined that there is no
potential impact to wildlife resources, the fee shall be $25.00. If
the applicant/ developer has not delivered the required fees
within such 15 day period, the approval for the project granted
herein shall be
void.28. If not used, this Conditional Use Permit shall expire
two 2) years from the date of Planning commission
approval.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Design Review Board Appeal
No.1-91 is denied because the city Council has determined
that the building design is consistent with the Old Towne
Design Guidelines.ADOPTED this 14th day of
May
1991.ATTEST:b.(
f,VI~ ~.~city Cle k of h ity
of
Orange
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly adopted by the City Council of the city of Orange at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of May ,
1991, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: BARRERA, MAYOR BEYER, COONTZ, SPURGEON
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: STEINER
f~
c~h3i of Orange
5