RES-8277 Granting Conditional Use Permit No. 2030-93RESOLUTION NO. 8277
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ORANGE UPHOLDING THE RECOMMENDA-
TION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ORANGE AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND TO CREATE LOTS WITH-
OUT DIRECT ACCESS TO A PUBLIC STREET UPON
PROPERTY SITUATED WEST OF PROSPECT STREET
BETWEEN THE COLLINS AVENUE BRIDGE AND WALNUT
AVENUE.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2030-
93 APPLICANT: BEAZER HOMES CALIFORNIA,
INC.
RECITALS:After report thereon by the Planning commission and
after due pUblic hearings as required by law, and after receiving
a recommendation from the Planning Commission, recommending,
by Resolution No. PC-52-93, that Conditional Use
Permit 2030-93 be granted to allow development of a planned
unit development and to create lots without direct access to
a public street upon property situated west of Prospect
street between the Collins Avenue bridge and Walnut Avenue,
the City Council considered Conditional Use Permit 2030-
93 and determined that the recommendation of the Planning
commission should be upheld and Conditional Use Permit 2030-
93 be granted. Subject property is more
particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached.During the public hearing,
the City
Council found the facts as follows:1. The site is irregularly
shaped and approximately 23 acres in size located west
of Prospect Street between the Collins Avenue bridge and
Walnut Avenue (the northerly two-
thirds of the Rock Creek Residential Development).2. The applicant
is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Conditional
Use Permit to allow the development of the subject site
with a 423 dwelling unit Planned Unit Development.
The proposal includes the creation of 154 lots, of which 131 lots
do not have direct access to a public street.
The proposal will replace the northerly two thirds of
the
previously approved Rock Creek Ranch townhouse development.Orange Municipal Code (
OMC) Section 16.08.010 permits Plan-ning Commission review
of a Tentative Tract Map subject to the requirements of the Subdivision
Map Act and Title 1,6 of the OMC. Also, OMC Section
17.66.040 requires approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to create a Planned Unit Development,and OMC Section 17.94.
050.A requires approval of a condi-tional use
permit
prior
to
3. The subject site is designated by the City's General Plan
Land Use Policy Map as Low/Medium Density Residential, 6 to
15 dwelling units per acre, and the site is zoned R-
3 Residential Multiple-
Family) District.4. The subject site was previously owned by
the Conrock Company, and a history of the
previously approved applications that affected the site are
as follows:A. The Conrock Company owned 110 acres of
land located south of Collins Avenue, north of Spring Street,
and on both sides of the Santiago Creek. The majority
of the Conrock property east of the Santiago Creek
channel had been used for building material
extraction and contained four open pits, with one
pit approximately 125
feet deep.B. In 1984 the City Council approved a
General Plan Amendment in 1984 and Zone Change 1008
that designated the portions of the site adjacent to the
Santiago Creek bed between Spring Street and Collins
Avenue for multifamily development, and the easterly
portion of the site between Walnut Avenue and Bond
Avenue for single family development. The original
approval also required a new alignment for Prospect Street so
as to directly connect Chapman Avenue and Collins
Avenue, and improvements to the Santiago
Creek Channel.The Council's 1984 approvals allowed the
development of the 1 1 0 acre site with a total of 650 -
dwelling units, which were to be a combination of singe
family,townhouse, and mobile
homes.C. In 1984 the City Council also certified
Environmental Impact Report 861 as addressing the
environmental impacts of the proposed 650 dwelling unit
development.D. In 1987, the City Council approved Tentative Tract
Map 13098 and Conditional Use Permit 1633 to allow 1
0 acres (of Conrock's 1 1 0 acres) located west of
the Santiago Creek channel to be developed with 84
town houses (the existing Vista Santiago
Townhouse
Development) .E. In 1989, the City Council approved a rough grading
plan for the remaining 100 acres that included filling
in the large pits and regrading the site to allow
for
development.F. In 1989, the City Council also approved Tentative
Tract Maps 13841 and 13842, Zone Change 1104-
88, Conditional Use Permit 1738-88, Variance
1855-88, and Administra-tive Adjustment
88-13, and certified Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report (SEIR) 861. Approval of these requests
permitted the development of approxi-mately 71 acres north of Walnut
Avenue and west of
the
new alignment of Prospect street with multifamily
residences, and east of Prospect Street with single
family residences. The proposed developments contained
485 condominium units and 73 single family units, for a
total of 558 dwelling units. Approval of these
applications were subject to 76 conditions (which
include 19 mitigation measures required by SEIR 861) .
The applicant for this proposal was wait Homes and the
development was called Rock Creek Ranch.
5. As of september 1, 1993, the Rock Creek Development has
completed the rough grading of the site, the construction of
the Santiago Creek improvements, the new alignment of
Prospect street, and the construction of 60 multifamily
units. The single family project located east of Prospect
street has not been started.
6. The subject site has been rough graded and slopes downward
from Prospect street towards the santiago Creek channel.
The majority of the site's easterly perimeter is screened
from Prospect street by a 6 foot high masonry wall and
landscaping.
7. Primary access to the site is via Prospect street, which is
designated by the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways
as a "Secondary" arterial highway with an ultimate right-
of-way width of 80 feet. Prospect Street is fully
improved with two travel lanes in each direction, and
landscaped parkways and median
island.8. The surrounding land uses include the vacant property
owned by the applicant zoned R-1-6 and
single family residences zoned R-I-7 (Residential,
Single Family, minimum lot size 7,000 square feet) to the
east, an abandoned gravel quarry under County jurisdiction
to the northeast; condominiums and apartments across Santiago Creek zoned
R-3 to the west; -and the condominiums
within the Rock Creek Ranch
development zoned R-3 to the south.9. The applicant is proposing
to develop the 23 acre site with two
distinct products: 201 condominium units, and
100 attached single family residences. The condominium development is proposed
to be located on the site's southerly 13.
60 acres, and the attached single family residences on
the site's northerly 9.40 acres.The
proposed projects will replace the northerly two-thirds
of the approved Rock Creek Ranch condominium development.Of
the previously approved 485 dwelling, only the southerly 122 units
will be built. With construction of this project,
the total unit count will decrease to 423.10. Tentative
Tract Map 14847 proposes to subdivide the site
into 154
lots to be used
as follows:
LOT
DESIGNATION Lots #1 through #
36
Lots #137 through #136
Lot #137
Lots #138 through #142
Lots "A" through "L"
Attached single Family
A communal recreational area
Public Landscaping area
Private streets and drives.
The condominium lots range in size from 7,405 square feet.
to 19,166 square feet and will contain from two to six units
each. The attached single family lots range in size from
2,300 square feet to 3,500 square feet and each will contain
one dwelling unit.
11. The condominium units will range in size from 979 square
feet to 1,532 square feet, while the attached single family
residences will range in size from 1,433 square feet to
1,885 square feet.
The condominiums are grouped three to six units per
building, each building two stories in height. The
condominium proposal includes 6 floor plans, of which three
are two story townhouses, and three are single level units
placed over the garages (referred to
as carriage units).story townhouses, and three are single
level units placed over the garages (referred to as carriage
units).
12. The building setbacks from Prospect street will be a minimum
25 feet for the condominium buildings and will range from 15
feet to 55 feet for the attached single family units. The
building setback from the Santiago Creek channel right-
of-way will be a minimum 10 feet for the condominium
buildings and will range from 6 feet to 8 feet for the attached
single family
residences.The condominium buildings will have a minimum
building separation of 15 feet when the buildings are side by
side and 25 feet when the buildings are back to back or when
two private yard areas are
adjacent.The majority of the single family units are attached by
one wall to one other unit, and have a minimum 10 feet
building separation from other
units.13. The proposal provides 681 parking spaces on-
site. The parking provided includes 602 garage spaces and
79 open parking spaces. The condominium development will
have 49 parking spaces either located in building
courtyards or perpendicular to the private drives, while
the attached single family will have 30 parallel on-
street spaces. All 301 units are provided with a
two car garage.14. External access to the proposed developments will
be via two unmanned gated entryways, one located onto
Walnut Avenue and the other onto Prospect street. The
Walnut Avenue entryway was built as part of the original
Rock Creek Ranch development and existing private streets
in the development provide access through the development.
The Prospect Street gated entry way will be built opposite to Bond
Street at its Reso
No.
intersection with Prospect street.
The proposal is not designed to include gated entryways
between the existing townhouse development and the
proposals, or between the condominium development and the
attached single family residences.
The Prospect street gated entryway is anticipated to be the
project's primary entrance and will be designed to have a
car turnaround, three parking spaces, stacking for four
cars, and a directory outside the gate. The Walnut Avenue
gated entry drive is the secondary entrance and was designed
to have a car turnaround outside the gate, stacking for two
cars, and a directory outside the gate.
15. The internal access to the residences will be via private
streets and drives. The private streets will either be 28
feet in width without on-street parking, or 32 feet in
width with parallel parking on one side of the street.
The private drives will have a minimum width of 25
feet.16. The proposal includes a communal recreational facility on
an 18,730 square feet parcel located towards the center of
the site. The communal recreational facility will contain
a swimming pool, a Jacuzzi, a pool cabana, and a
barbecue
area.17. The proposed condominium and attached single
family developments will be incorporated within the
existing Homeowners Association for the townhouse development.
The Homeowner Association will be responsible for
the maintenance of the private streets and drives, the
commonly owned landscaping areas, the communal recreational
facility,and patio fencing. The proposal includes CC&Rs that
will indicate permitted construction material, exterior
colors,
etc.18. The proposal includes double trash enclosures for both
the condominium and attached single family residences.
The enclosures will be located within the condominium building'
s courtyards or on the private street for the attached
single family
residences.19. Due to the 28 foot grade differential from the
Collins Avenue bridge to the project's southerly property line,
the proposal includes the construction of several
retaining walls and the grading of several large slopes. The
largest retaining wall is proposed along the site's
easterly boundary and near the existing perimeter wall. This
wall will range in height from 6 feet to 10 feet and will have
a separation from the existing wall of 1 foot to 40
feet.There are also numerous smaller retaining walls
located through-out the project (as were included in
the previous
approved project) .20. Private patios and small rear yards are provided
for the larger condominium units and the attached
single family 5 Reso
No.
residences. Also, to improve the utilization of the private
yard space for the attached single family residences, the
tentative tract map includes a 5 foot wide easement for open
space and recreational purposes to be assigned to from one
parcel to the neighboring parcel. The easement allows for a
fenced in 10 foot wide side yard area on one side of the
residence and zero yard space on the other, as oppose to
having a 5 foot setback on both sides of the residence.
21. The project does not include any public improvements since
the applicant has completed the improvements for the
originally approved Rock Creek Ranch development. The
public improvements completed included a new alignment for
Prospect street, channeling of the Santiago Creek bed,
extension of Walnut Avenue from Prospect Street to santiago
Creek, the grading and landscaping of a 1 acre park site at
the end of Walnut Avenue, and a bike trail along the Creek.
22. The proposal's overall site density of approximately 13
dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Low Medium
Density Residential General Plan designation of 6 to 15
dwelling units per acre established in 1984 when the city
Council approved the General Plan Amendment in 1984 and Zone
Change 1008.
Condominium
Combined
14.9 dwelling units/acre
201 dwelling units/13.60 acres
10.4 dwelling units/acre
100 dwellinq units/9.58 acres
13.0 dwelling units/acre
301 dwelling units/23.18 acres
Attached Single Family
23. The applicant's proposal for a condominium and a planned
unit development is regulated by the Orange Municipal Code
Chapter 17.66, Planned Unit Developments and Condominiums.
The intent of Chapter 17.66 is to encourage more imaginative
and efficient residential projects than can be developed by
strict adherence to the Zoning Ordinance base zone
requirements, by allowing flexibility in establishing
development standards. Also, this Chapter's intent is to
create a wider variety of housing types and greater areas of
open space by reducing the amount of land needed for pUblic
streets, easements, etc.
To achieve the intent stated above, Chapter 17.66
establishes only two development standards; the maximum
site coverage and off-street parking requirement
Although Chapter 17.66 also addresses maximum site density,
previous City Council approvals specific to this site and
as discussed above, supersede this Chapter. The
applicable standards are based on the zoning classification of
the subject property, which in this case is R-3. Below
is a comparison of the code requirements and
the proposal:
site coverage area devoted
to
buildings,REOUIREMENTS
Max.
65%
open
PROPOSED 60%Reso
No.
parking, and driveways, but not
including private streets)
Off-street Parking 677
spaces 2.25 per
unit one covered
space per
unit)681
spaces 2.26 per
unit 2
garage space/
unit)The proposed site coverage is less than the maximum
permitted,and the parking provided exceeds Code
requirements.The site plan shows 79 guest parking spaces, 47 provided for
the condominium development and 32 provided for the attached
single family development. staff review of the site plan found that
the guest parking was equally distributed through-
out
the development.24. Development standards not specified within Chapter 17.66,
such as building setbacks, building separation, and
recreation and leisure area, are proposed by the developer and determined
by the Planning commission and City Council at the time a site
plan is approved. The applicant's proposed site plan
indicates
the following:
Building
Setback
Building Separation
Driveway depth
Private Patio &
Yard
Space
Common
Recreational
Area
Condominium
product 8'
from private street,
drive
or
driveway)15'less than
9' or greater
than 18'Two story -
250 sq.
ft.carriage unit -
none
13,000 sq. ft.
provided for
both
developments.
sinale Familv
front -3'
side -5' or 0'
rear - 5'10'
less
than 3' or greater
than 18'900
to 1,200 sq.ft.
The
communal recreational area indicated above is about one-third
less than the area indicated on the tentative tract map (Lot
137) since the parcel has several extensions that are too narrow
or steep for any use.
The previously approved townhouse development provided two
recreational areas that had a combined area of approximately
22,000 square feet of usable recreational area.
The proposal provides 43 square feet of recreational area per
r
7 Reso No,. 8277
dwelling unit, and compares to other developments as follows:
Western National Properties, Santiago Hills 88 sq.ft.junit
Standard Pacific condominiums, Santiago Hills 56 sq.
ft.junit
Inter American, Santiago Hills 47 sq. ft.junit
25. Chapter 17.66 of the orange Municipal Code requires building
height within PUD's to comply with the base zone require-
ments unless the Planning commission makes specific
exception in approval of the conditional use permit. The
building elevations indicate the condominium and attached
single family structures will have a maximum height of 35
feet, which is 5 feet' higher than that allowed for
developments in the R-3
District.26. The applicant has included a restriction to be placed in
the C,C & Rs that there shall be no building additions
that increase the usable square footage of any of the
dwelling units. The C,C &Rs will make allowance for minor
building improvements, such as bay windows and sky lights, subject
to approval of the Homeowners
Association.27. The Conditional Use Permit application includes a request
to allow the creation of 131 lots without direct access to
a public street. The intent of requiring a conditional
use permit is to allow for flexibility in subdivision design
and to ensure that all parcels to be created will have access
to public streets, including by private streets and drives.
To ensure that the proposed parcels will have permanent
access to public streets, the tentative tract map includes
Lettered Lots "A" through "L" that contain private streets
and drives, and the recommended conditions require
that ingressjegress easements for all parcels be included
with the tentative tract
map.28. The Design Review Board reviewed the proposal
and preliminarily approved the building elevations,
building materials, and landscaping
plans.29. The Environmental Review Board (ERB) reviewed the
proposal and had the following
comments:A. The proposal does not require additional
environmental review since EIR 861 & SEIR 861 have already
addressed the environmental impacts of development of
multifamily residences on the site, at a similar
density.Furthermore, the mitigation measures applied to
the previous projects are included with the
recommended conditions for the present
applications.B. The numbered lots indicated on the tentative tract
map for common open space, landscaping area, and
the communal recreational area should be designated
as lettered lots so as to prevent the development of
these parcels for private purposes, such as
additional dwelling units or larger private
yards.Resa No. 8277
8
C. The project's southerly division property line was
established by Lot Line Adjustment 92-9, which
adjusted several lots lines of Tract 13841 to match
the applicant's planned build out of the townhouse
portion of the Rock Creek Ranch
development.D. The proposed development conforms to the city's
Zoning Ordinance requirements regarding parking, lot
coverage,and unit sizes are consistent with R-
3 requirements.E. To assure that no additional vehicular
access points onto Prospect street are established,
a condition recommends that all access right onto
Prospect street other than at the gated entry shall be assigned
to the City
of Orange.30. The Planning Commission, when making the
determination for the proposal, must decide that the applicant's
site plan,with the proposed building setback,
recreational and landscaping area provided, and reduced driveway length,
is a superior development over a
conventional development.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council
of the City of Orange that Tentative Tract 14847 be approved
for the
following reasons:1. That the Tentative Tract Map conforms to the City'
s General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance.2. That the Tentative Tract Map conforms to the
procedures and practices of the City's
Subdivision Ordinance.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Tentative Tract
14847 be approved subject to the
following conditions:1. Development shall be in substantial compliance with
plans as approved by the Planning Commission and on file
with the Department of
Community Development.2. The Design Review Board will review and
approve final building elevations, and landscaping plans prior
to issuance of
building permits.3. Copies of the Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report for this project will be available at the sales office
and the previous use and condition of the property shall
be fully disclosed to potential
new residents.4. If, in the future it is found the project will
require the hauling of any import/export of soil, the haul
routes will be established by a hearing of the
Planning commission.5.* That no construction take place between 7:00 P.M. and
7:00 A.M. on weekdays and Saturdays, or at any time on
Sunday or
Federal Holidays.9 Reso
6.* Developer shall utilize energy efficient built-in
appliances to aid in conservation of energy resources. Developer
shall certify compliance with a written statement to Department
of Community Development prior to issuance of building
permits.7.* All residential construction must comply with the
state Energy Insulation Standards (Title 24) and City of
Orange Building Codes in effect at the time of application
for building permits. The building permits have to be
noted that the plans conform to the state standards at time
of
issuance.8.* That the applicant provide Pacific Bell Telephone with
four to six months lead time to deal with transitionally
the existing telephone facilities with the addition of
the facilities needed for the project. The applicant
shall submit to the Department of Community Development
the applicant's notification letter to Pacific
Bell.9.* That glare from the private street lighting shall
be shielded, screened, and/or oriented so as to not be
seen from any point beyond the exterior boundaries of
the property and so that the source shall not be a nuisance
to any point beyond the exterior boundaries of the property
or cause illumination in the surrounding residential areas
in excess of 0.5
foot-candles.10. Additions to individual condominium units are
not permitted.Alterations such as bay windows, skylights
and interior modifications are allowed upon approval of
City
Building Permits.Conditions 11 through 40 shall be complied with
to the satisfaction of the City's Public Works Department and
other City Departments
as noted.11. Subject to conditions of Addendum Sheet
No.1.12. Monuments shall be set based on a
field survey.13. Construct any remaining portions of Prospect
Street not constructed with Tentative Tract
Map 13842.14. proposed numbered lots #137 through #142
shall be redesignated as lettered lots "M"
through "R".15. Any existing utilities, within Tentative Tract
Map 14847 boundaries, constructed with Tract 13841 and that
do not meet standard locations within new proposed
private streets shall be removed and reconstructed as
approved on improvement plans for Tentative Tract
Map 14847.16. Private streets shall be constructed to
private street standards as required by the Department of
Public Works.17. Vehicular access rights to Prospect street
shall be dedicated to the city
of orange.Reso
No.
8277
18. Sidewalks on private streets shall be constructed to provide
a minimum of 4 feet between outside edge of walk and any
obstructions (fire hydrants, street lights, mail boxes,
etc.) installed behind the curb.
19. Private streets shall have "No Parking at Any Time" signs
installed as required by the City Engineer. At those areas
where parking is specifically provided, the developer shall
install "Parking permitted in designated spaces only" signs.
20. Subject to dedicating an ingress/egress easement over
private streets to City of Orange for public related
functions.
21. C,C& R's to be reviewed and approved by the city Attorney's
office and Department of Community Development prior to
approval of final map.
22. Construct storm drain to City standards.
23. Dedicate and construct sewer system to City standards.
24. Subject to installing cable television facilities as
required by City's franchised cable TV companies. This
shall include easement rights to buildings being served.
25. All peripheral fencing/block walls shall be constructed ..,
within tract boundaries.
26. Erosion control facilities shall be installed after rough
grading per approved erosion control plan.
27. A final tract map shall be recorded within 24 months after
tentative approval and prior to the sale or lease of any
lot.
28. That an on-site dedicated waterline be installed as
designed by City Water
Department.29. That a 15' easement over private streets be dedicated
to include water main, meter, detector checks and
fire
hydrants.30. That each building be water metered separately
unless otherwise approved by the Water
Department.31. That the developer satisfy all water main connection
charges as determined by the Water
Department.32. That developer shall pay all Water Department fees
and charges prior to City Council approval of final tract
map.33. Proper sight distances shall be provided at Prospect
street
entryway.34. Install traffic signals at the Prospect Street/Spring
Street 11 ReaD No.
8277
intersection.
35. That the necessary easements and/or rights of entry at the
proposed signalized private road entry at Prospect
street/Bond Avenue, be granted to the city.
36. Final design of gated entrance shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to approval of
Final Tract Map.
37. That the gated entry at Prospect street/Bond Avenue be
provided with a minimum 100' throat to accommodate a five
vehicle queue.
38.* The applicant shall follow all mitigation measures listed in
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report #861 regarding site
grading.
39.* Restripe Chapman/Prospect to provide room for south bound
right turning vehicles. The existing striping of the north
and south legs can be shifted three feet east to provide a
19 foot south bound curb lane which the County of Orange
Growth Management Plan considered to be a through lane and
an unofficial right turn lane.
40.* The developer shall pay County Sanitation District #2 fees,
and city of Orange connection fees. A receipt for both fees
shall be filed with the Department of Community Development
prior to issuance of building permits.
The following conditions shall be complied with to the satisfac-
tion of the City's Crime Prevention Bureau.
41. That all windows and doors opening onto the courtyards for
the stacked flat condominiums shall have upgraded hardware
to protect against break-
ins.42. An address directory shall be illuminated at each entry,
at a location not obstructed by landscaping or cars
and approved by the Crime Prevention Bureau and Design
Review
Board.43.* All structures shall comply with the requirements
of Municipal Code - Chapter 15.52 (Building Security
Standards), which relates to use of security hardware,
doors, windows, and lighting (Ord 7-79). "Approved
products list 4/92" is
available.44.* All landscaping shall be maintained so that it does
not interfere with the required addressing or areas that
are required to be
illuminated.45. Additions to individual condominium units are not
permitted.Alterations such as bay windows, sky lights, and
interior modifications are
permitted.46. Perimeter landscaping and wall shall be maintained by
a Reso No. 8277
12
homeowners association or landscape maintenance district.
47. Developer shall construct recreation trail along santiago
Creek per City standards. Trail development shall be
designed to link other existing or proposed recreation
trails in the area and approved by the Community services
Department.
48. All parkways shall be developed with landscaping and City
street trees.
49. All street plantings to include the installation of root
barriers on the sidewalk side of the tree, or where
conditions warrant, the installation of a deep root box as
directed by the Community services Department.
50. Irrigation systems designed with a loop pressure main line
shall have a single P.O.C. per City Water Department
requirement.
51. Landscaping and irrigation plans shall be approved by the
Community services Department.
The fOllowing substantial code requirements are included for
information only. This list is not all inclusive of every code
requirement affecting this project.
Payment of the following fees as set at time of issuance of
building permits:
A. Transportation System Improvement Program (TSIP)
B. Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Program
C. Police Facilities Fees
D. Fire Facilities Fees
E. School Development Fees
F. Park Land Dedication Fees
The following requirements shall be complied with to the
satisfaction of the City's Police Department and other
Departments as noted.
Required lighting in the private street, parking area, and
drives shall meet the minimum requirements of 1 foot-
candle minimum maintained). The lighting plan shall
consider neighboring uses, not direct light onto, or create glare
for areas beyond the project, and shall include
photometrics showing compliance with 1
foot-candle.The Tract design shall incorporate the concepts
of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (
CPTED). CPTED involves the placement and orientation of homes,
the access and visibility of common or public open spaces
and the design of recreational trail areas. These
designs shall promote public safety and physical security
while allowing the residents or public the ability to self police
their own
neighboring areas.13 Reso
No.
8277
Submit a fencing plan to be approved by the Crime Prevention
Bureau, Planning Department, and Design Review Board, prior
to issuance of any building permits. Fencing shall be a
minimum height of 6 feet above finished grade and shall be
of a non-climbable design. Fencing around the
internal common recreation areas shall be a see-
through design.All residential structures shall
display approved illuminated address device(s) visible
to approaching emergency vehicles. Each multiple family
dwelling shall display an approved illuminated 4" address number
at the entry door. Exact location, number of devices,
and height of structure number(s) will be determined during
plan check by the crime
Prevention Bureau.Garage doors equipped with automatic garage
door operators shall be equipped with a secondary latching device
to secure the door against forced entry. The
secondary latching device shall be designed to work in conjunction
with the door operator and be approved by the
Crime
Prevention Bureau.Stairways providing exterior public access to
the second floor and second floor balcony railings or siding
shall be designed to provide see-through visibility
above
the walking surface.The following requirements shall be complied
with to the satisfaction of the City's Fire Department
and other
Departments as noted.An approved fire sprinkler system
must be installed throughout the building per O.M.C. 15.
32.080 section 10.306(a). The system shall be designed per N.F.
P.A. 13,N.F.P.A. 13D or 13R, U.B.C. Chapter 38 and U.
B.C. standard 38-1. The sprinkler system
requires 24 hour supervision.Fire sprinklers are required in
residential buildings 5,000
square feet or more.The Fire Department connection shall not
be affixed to the building. The fire department connection
must be located at least 40 feet away from the building, within
40 feet of a fire hydrant, and on the address
side of the building,unless otherwise determined by
the fire department. The hydrant shall be located on the same side
of the street as
the fire department connection.Provide on-site fire hydrant(
s) and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow.
The hydrant model and on-site locations shall be approved
by the Fire Department and have a three (3)
foot minimum clearance around the circumference of the
fire hydrant. The on-site hydrants shall not be controlled by the
control valve (P.I.V.) for the sprinkler system so that
water flow to the hydrants is not impaired should the
sprinkler system be shut down for any reason. (U.F.C. 10.206
and 10.301) Plans must
be submitted to
the
Building
The number and location of hydrants shall be determined by
Fire and Water Departments.
Prior to issuance of a fire service (detector check) the
required water supplies for hydrants and fire sprinkler
systems shall be determined and the water supplies shall be
approved by the Fire Department.
Every building shall be accessible to Fire Department
apparatus by an access roadway of not less than 20 feet of
unobstructed width having a minimum of 13 feet 6 inches of
vertical clearance. the access roadway shall be extended to
within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the
first story of any building. An additional 8 feet is
required for parking: i.e., a fire apparatus access road,
with vehicle parking on one side, shall be not less than 28
feet in width. A fire access road with parking on both
sides shall be not less than 36 feet in width. U.F.C. sec.
10.207
Fire access lanes shall be signed and marked according the
City of Orange Fire Departments Access Standards.
The Fire Department access roadway shall be an all weather
driving surface capable of supporting the imposed loads of
fire apparatus, 40,000 pounds and shall not exceed the angle
of departure for fire apparatus on any slope. U.F.C. 10.201
14.
The Fire Department access roadway shall be
adequate turning radius for Fire Department
40 foot outside and 20 foot inside radius.)
provided with
apparatus. (A
U.F.C. 10.207
The proposed development is within a climatic and
topographic high hazard and fire zone (Ordinance 5-
87),which requires all buildings constructed in the zone to
have class A fire retarding roof with fire stopped and
enclosed eaves. In addition, a spark arrestor is required
on chimneys, maximum one-half inch
screen required.ADOPTED this 14 th day of
December
1993.By:
1h~Q~~CityCle ofUtha/City
of Orange
GENE BEYER Mayor of the City
of Orange
Mayor ~ tern . //f<..e </"/0 f-'l.
C
c<... \ATTEST:I hereby certify that
the foregoing regularly adopted by the city
Council of regular meeting thereof held on
the 14 the
following vote:Resolution was
duly and the city of Orange
at a th of December ,
1993, by 15 Reao
No.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Reso No. 8277
T
COUNCIL MEMBERS: SPlRGEX:l'l, BI\RRERA, MAYOR BEYER, aJONTZ, MURPHY
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NCl>lE
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NCl>lE
IAAA'/~~)R a~City
Clerk f th CitY of Orange SSH:
dg 16
EXHIBIT "A"
TTM 14847
Being a subdivision of Lots 13 to 16, Tract No. 13842, as shown
on map filed in Book 674, Pages 28 to 42 inclusive of Maps, and
Parcels 5 to 8 of Lot Line Adjustment No. LL-92-9,
both records of
Orange
County.
17r