RES-8182 Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2-93RESOLUTION NO, 8182
A RESOLUTION 01' THE CITY COmrCIL 01' THB
CITY 01' ORANGB UPHOLDING THE RECOMMBIlIDA-
TION 01' THE PLANlUNG COIUlISSION 01' THE
CITY 01' ORANGB AND APPROVING TIlB GBNERAL
PLAN CLASSII'ICATION 01' PROPBRTY SITUATBD
DIRECTLY ADJACBNT TO AND NORTH 01' SMl'l'IAGO
CREBK AND SOU'l'H 01' JlABURY AVB:NUB BBTWEBN
LASsn AND ORANGB PARlt BOULBVARDS,
GBNERAL PLAN AMBIlIDMBNT 2-
113 JIA)ISON PROPBRTIBS WEST.
INC.
RECITALS:After due public hearings as required by law, the
City Council of the City of Orange considered a recommendation of
the Planning commission of the City of Orange recommending,
by Resolution No, PC 7-93 that certain property
situated directly adjacent to and north of Santiago Creek and south
of Mabury Avenue between Lassen and Orange Park Boulevards
be redesignated from the resource area designation to the low
density residential designation and approved said recommendation after
finding and determining the hereinafter described facts. The
real property which is the subject of the redesignation is
more particularly described
as follows:See Exhibit "
A" attached.The City Council finds in favor of the
proposed residential use of the site although it precludes mineral
development, as intended by the designation as a regionally
significant aggregate resource sector by the State Mining and Geology Board,
based upon the
following considerations:The entire 120 acre aggregate mining property,
of which 12,6 acres forms the project site, has
been utilized for mineral extraction for more than 40 years
and the extraction life is mostly depleted, On
a regional scale, there are greater
extracting opportunities elsewhere in
the County.The 12,6 acre project site is physically
isolated from the rest of the mining property by Santiago
Creek, thus deferring any possible
mineral
extraction opportunities,Furthermore, the 12.6 acre site has not
been utilized for mineral extraction due to its
proximity to neighboring single family residences which,
if such extraction activities whereto occur, would
be impacted by noise and dust associated with
Upon the public hearing before the City Council, the
following facts were established:
1, The irregular shaped project site is 12,6 acres in size and
consists of four parcels of land: a 9.6 acre parcel, and an
approximately 2,7 acre portion of a 15,6 acre parcel, which
are two of several parcels that form the Sully-
Miller aggregate mining property: a 0,14 acre parcel known as Lot
B of Tract 9827: and the majority of a 0,18 acre parcel
known as Lot A of Tract 9827, The site is located
directly adjacent to and north of santiago Creek and south of
Mabury Avenue between Lassen and Orange Park Boulevards,
It borders the residential neighborhood to the north
commonly referred to as Mabury
Ranch,2. The applicant proposes to develop the project site
for residential purposes and requests approval of the
following discretionary permits, The project also requires that
Tract 9827 be amended to allow Lots A and B to be part of
the development
site,A, General Plan Amendment 2-93 - to amend the Land
Use Element of the city's General Plan, changing
the project site's land use designation from Resource
Area to Low Density Residential, 2-6 dwelling
units
per acre,B, Zone Change 1146-93 - to change the site'
s zoning designation from S-G (Sand and Gravel
Extraction) to R-1-8 (Single Family
Residential, minimum lot size requirement of
8,000 square feet),C. Tentative Tract Map 14747 - to subdivide
the site into 25 residential parcels, ranging in
lot size from approximately 8,000 to 17,000 square
feet, and
3 lettered lots,D. Variance 1947-93 - to allow a reduction in
the 80 foot minimum lot frontage requirement of
the R-I-8 District,California Government Code Section
65358 allows the City to amend its General Plan Land Use Element
a maximum of 4 times a year. Orange Municipal Code
Section 17,06.050 permits change to zoning
classifications subject to public hearing before both the
Planning Commission and City Council.Orange Municipal Code Chapter
16,08 sets forth regulations that pertain to the
processing of tentative tract maps,Orange Municipal Code Section 17.
92.020 allows the Planning Commission
to rule on variance applications,3. The project site slopes slightly
from north to south with more significant
topographic changes along the proposed development boundary, created
by the incision of Santiago Creek, where portions of the
embankment experience
25 to 30 foot
4. The site has recently been cleared of most vegetation to
allow for temporary agricultural activities, A few
eucalyptus and other common trees are located along the
northern portion of the property bordering an existing off-
site recreation trail, Native vegetation exists within and
along the creek bed.
5. The majority of the project site is part of the SUlly-
Miller aggregate mining property which generally encompasses
the approximately 120 acre area north of Santiago Canyon
Road and south of Mabury Avenue between Loma Street and
orange Park Boulevard (see attached exhibit A), Although
this portion of the SUlly-Miller property has not been
mined, the sand and gravel extraction use was approved in 1950
when the property was under the jurisdiction of the County
of Orange,Annexation to the city of orange was initiated
through Pre-Zone Change #370, designating the zoning of the
property as S-G, Sand and Gravel Extraction
District, with final annexation occurring in January,
1965 (Annexation #228),The aggregate mining operation on the
property south of santiago Creek was modified
through subsequent conditional use permit approvals to allow for the
replacement of two asphalt batch plants and the installation
of a concrete batch plant (
CUP #498 & #704),6, Lots A and B of Tract 9827 have been
recently acquired by the applicant from the Standard
Pacific development company to be part of the project site, These lots are
two of three lettered lots that were created through
the SUbdivision of Tract 9827, recorded in May, 1978. All
three lots, which total approximately ,55 acres of land, are
located along the south side of Mabury Avenue and appear to
be remnant parcels created by the final alignment design of
Mabury Avenue (see
attached exhibit B).7. A 50-foot wide easement traverses the
site from the northern central portion to the southeastern corner
of the site, The easement contains a high pressure
water line, 9-feet in diameter, that is own and
maintained by the Municipal Water
District of orange County (MWDOC).8, Access to the site's
future residences will be provided through the
proposed extension of Yellowstone Boulevard south of Mabury
Avenue. Yellowstone Boulevard and Mabury Avenue are local streets as designated
by the city's Master Plan of Streets and Highways and
are built to their ultimate planned right-of-way
widths of 68 feet and 66 feet,respectively, At this time,
access to the site may also be gained from
the south via the Sully-Miller aggregate mining properties off
Santiago Canyon Road by crossing at a natural ford in
the creek. Once the project is developed, however,
there will be no access from the south,9.
An improved recreational trail exists within the right-of-way of
Mabury Avenue and borders the project site's northern
boundary, The City'S Draft Master Plan of Recreational Trails refers to
the trail as #29
by equestrians, cyclists and hikers, Trail #29 is part of
the Santiago Creek trail system and provides a linkage to
Santiago Oaks Regional Park,
10, The surrounding land uses include single family residences
zoned R-I-8 to the north, and the remaining
aggregate mining operations, which include a sand and gravel plant, a
hot mix asphalt plant, and a concrete and
asphalt recycling operation, zoned S-G to the south, east
and west
across santiago Creek,11, The project site is adjacent to, but not
within the limits of, the orange Park Acres Plan and the
East Orange General Plan (1976 Amendment) areas, Santiago Creek
is the boundary for both of these land use plans, as depicted
in exhibit C.Future development proposals for the remainder
of the Sully-Miller property will be governed
by these plans,12, The applicant initiated the development
review process in December, 1991, with an application for
a general plan amendment and zone change, These
applications were placed on hold by the applicant pending
the decision to concurrently process a subdivision map.
In September, 1992,the applicant circulated
three conceptual subdivision alternatives to the Mabury Homeowners
Association for their review and comment, Some of the early
issues that the applicant discussed with the
Mabury residents regarded whether the proposed development should
include homes that would front onto Mabury Avenue and if the
proposed access to the development would connect
directly with Yellowstone Boulevard, A tentative tract
map application was subsequently submitted to the City
in November, 1992,13. The applicant requests a change in the site'
s general plan land use and zoning designations,
which currently provide for sand and gravel extraction, in order to
allow for a single-family residential
subdivision consisting of 25 residential lots and 3 lettered lots.
As indicated on the proposed tract map, the residential lots
range in size from S,600 square feet to 17,480 square
feet, The lettered lots provide for the street
circulation system, an emergency access, and a maintenance road within
an improved slope area
adjacent to Santiago Creek,14, Approximately 120,000 cubic yards
of import material is required to improve the area
for development, The lowest portion of the site will be
raised approximately 30 feet,and is the area surrounding lot
20. A manufactured, tiered slope (shown as Lot A) will be
created along the boundary between the development and Santiago
Creek, The slope area will contain a 20 foot wide maintenance road
at the base of the first 2:1 slope, with the
lower slope portions improved to channelize the creek's
flow. TWo creek improvement alternatives are proposed; either using
stone rip rap or soil cement along the creek's edge.
Please refer to the tract map which includes a cross
section of each
proposed creek improvement alternative.
15, Access to the residential development will be provided
through the extension of Yellowstone Boulevard south of
Mabury Avenue, Shown as Lot C on the tract map, the
extended roadway creates an internal circulation system
consisting of 3 cul-de-sacs (A, B, and C streets)
that are to be designed to public street standards,
constructed by the applicant and maintained by the City of
Orange, The cross section for the proposed streets details
36' wide roadways with 5'5" wide sidewalks and 6'1" parkways
to be contained within a 60' wide right-
of-way, The street entrance to the tract is shown to have
a 70' wide right-of-way to accommodate
a landscaped, center median, Maintenance of the landscaped median and
the parkways will be the responsibility of the
future property owners through the
formation of a homeowners association,16, An emergency access (Lot B) will
be provided at the terminus of the cul-de-sac detailed
as street A. This 20 foot wide emergency access links
to the 20 foot wide creek maintenance road and then to
Mabury Avenue. It provides for a secondary access to Street
A, which exceeds 600 feet in length,17, The site is
located within an area designated as a
regionally significant aggregate resource sector (Sector J)by the state Mining
and Geology Board, The city's General Plan
Technical Report describes Sector J as containing approximately 16
percent of the known sand and gravel resources
with the region. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 2763,
the City must prepare a Statement of Findings specifying
the reasons for permitting a land use that precludes
mineral development to submit to the State Mining and Geology Board
for their review, In making such a Statement of
Findings, the city of Orange should consider the
importance of potential mining opportunities to the market region as a whole
and
not just the importance to the City,18, The
requested proposal involves the redevelopment of a limited portion
of an area designated as a significant aggregate
resource sector, Although the applicant's intent is
to eventually redevelop the entire property for
residential purposes, the subject proposal was initiated prior to
the an overall redevelopment proposal because of several factors unique
to the project site, The site's aggregate mining
opportunities, if any, are limited by the residential
development of the adjacent property to the north because
noise and dust impacts associated with mining
would have deterred such opportunities, Furthermore, the site'
s proximity to existing residential development and it's
separation via Santiago Creek from the property utilized
for sand and gravel operations, supported the proposal
to redevelop the area for residential purposes,19, The project site contains two
parcels, Lots A and B of Tract
9827, that are designated as non-
buildable sites,Traditionally, non-
preserve open space areas as means of conservation, and to
provide for recreational opportunities, visual relief,
and/or development buffering. The lots in question do not
serve such purposes. They are undeveloped parcels of land
that appear as remnant parcels created by the final
alignment design of Mabury Avenue. By amending Tract 9827,
the City will be removing the non-buildable restriction
to allow for the proposed development, Justification for
this action could also be supported by the recognition that
the proposed tract will provide an open space area adjacent
to Santiago
Creek,20, Primary issues in the development of this tract relate
to Santiago Creek in regard to the proposed improvements,
and the maintenance and liability responsibilities,
The proposal requires the construction of creek improvements
in order to stabilize the creek's embankment and to
protect residents from a 100-year flood. The submitted
tract map details two creek improvement alternatives, It
is the city's preference to see rip rap used to improve
the channel rather than soil cement, However, the
improvements proposed must comply with the Orange County Flood
Control District design and construction standards given that it
is the City's intent for the facility to ultimately be
dedicated to the County through an irrevocable
maintenance easement.Improvements to the creek area also
require permitting through the State's Department of Fish and Game.
This State agency may have an improvement design preference
as well.As a condition of approval, the applicant will
be required to meet the requirements and obtain the
necessary permits from the
above agencies,The tract map indicates that the improved creek
may be dedicated to the County Flood Control District or
the city of Orange, It is staff's understanding
through discussion with the applicant's consultant that the County
does not want to accept a portion of the improved creek,
and prefers to wait until the entire segment of the creek
through the SUlly-Miller properties is improved
and offered for dedication, The City of Orange, thus, needs
to agree to accept responsibility for the
maintenance and liabilities during the interim, until the entire segment
can be improved and offered
to the County,21. The applicant is requesting a
residential land use designation of "Low Density (2-6
dwelling units per acre)",which is the same as that
of the adjacent residential development to the north, The
proposed density of the development is 1,98 units per
gross acre, The proposed development is therefore
compatible with the adjacent residential development in regard to
type and intensity of use and complies with
the requested density designation,22, The applicant is requesting
zoning designation of R-1-8,which is the same
as that of the adjacent residential development to the north
and thus provides for a natural extension of
the existing neighborhood.
The
requires that the m~n~mum building site area for each
single-family residence shall be 8,000 square feet, and
the minimum lot frontage and depth shall be 80 feet, as
measured at the setback line, and 100 feet, respectively, All of
the proposed residential lots comply with the minimum
building site area and lot depth requirements, However, 18 of the
25 lots do not provide the required minimum lot
frontage,23. Variance 1947-93 has been requested in order to
allow a reduction in the 80 foot minimum lot
frontage requirement,18 lots have reduced lot frontages, as measured
at the setback line. They are as follows: Lots 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 12,13, 15, 23, 24, and 25 have 70' of lot frontage (12,
5% less than required); Lots 7, 11, and 19 have 72' of
lot frontage 10% less than required); Lots 18 and 22 have 73'
of lot frontage (approx. 9% less than required); Lot 8 has
75' of lot frontage (6% less than required); and, Lot 16 has
77' of lot frontage (4% less
than required),The code does offer an administrative remedy
for cul-de-sac lots and lots that require a 10
percent adjustment in the lot frontage
requirement. staff, however, collectively presented the requested waivers
as a variance application given the number
of reduced lot frontages,24, The zoning code currently requires
lot frontages to increase proportionally with the required lot size (
i,e, 60' is required for Rl-6,000, 70' for Rl-
7,000, and 80' for R1-8,000,
etc,), which standardizes development tracts by
creating uniform, rectangular shaped lots. Traditional,grid-
oriented neighborhoods reflect this approach to zoning standards.
In the comprehensive update to the zoning ordinance,
staff has proposed revising the lot frontage requirements to
allow for
variety in lot configurations and subdivision layouts,The lot
configurations differ from and offer more variety than
the traditional, grid-oriented subdivisions as a
result of the proposed "cul-de-sac" circulation system, The
proposed lot frontages range from 70' to 100', The
proposed reduction in frontage from the 80' requirement does not
appear to hinder access to the individual lots
and no detrimental impact is anticipated due
to narrow lot configurations proposed by this subdivision. The minimum
lot frontage proposed is 70' which adequately provides
for a driveway access and a front landscape
setback area,Furthermore, the narrower lot widths are compensated by
increasing lot depths, which in turn provide for more
usable open space opportunities in the rear of
the property,The proposed lot configurations were somewhat
constrained by providing a direct extension of Yellowstone Boulevard
into the site, This constraint may have been eliminated
by offsetting the entry street, but such a
solution presented traffic safety concerns, Furthermore, a
direct extension of Yellowstone provides a
better integration between the
development. The applicant has informed staff that the
direct access was also preferred by the Mabury residents.
A similar variance request was included
proposal for Mabury Ranch (Tract 9319),
allowed a reduction in lot frontage for
388 residential parcels,
25. Orange Municipal Code section 17,92,020 lists the following
criteria for the approval of variance requests;
in the master tract
Variance 1424
12% of the proposed
A, That any variance granted shall be subject to such
conditions as will assure that the adjustments thereby
authorized shall not constitute a grant of special
privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other
properties in the vicinity and zone in which the
subject property is situated,
B, That because of special circumstances applicable to the
subject property, including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings, the strict application of the
zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity and under identical zoning classification,
26, The importation of 120,000 cubic yards of fill material will
require approximately 8,000 truck trips to the project site.
Grading and hauling operations may have an impact on nearby
residences from blowing dust, noise and increased truck
traffic. The applicant has indicated that the hauling
trucks will access the site from the south by traveling
along Santiago Canyon Road, entering the Sully-
Miller aggregate mining property and crossing the ford in
Santiago Creek, In accordance with the City'S Manual of
Grading,this haul operation will require City Council
approval,27. The residential development of the site will alter
the scenic views of the adjacent residents to the north
looking southward. As discussed in the Negative Declaration,
the proposed pad elevations are slightly lower than
the elevations of the existing residences along Mabury
Avenue and the proposed construction of 1 and 2 story homes
will impact views, The R-1-8 development
standards may lessened that impact by regulating a structure's
maximum height and placement on the
property, Furthermore, proposed development standards contained in the updated
draft of the comprehensive zoning ordinance, if adopted,
will regulate a structure's bulk and mass in relationship
to lot size.28. The tract map shows lots 1-8 and
21-25 with frontage along the proposed cul-
de-sac street system and Mabury Avenue.The applicant has
indicated that no homes will front onto Mabury Avenue, which
is in response to concerns expressed to the applicant
by the Mabury residents, To further support this concern, staff
has included a condition that the access rights to Mabury Avenue will
be dedicated to the city as a requirement of
the final map approval, Furthermore, it is likely that
the development will
include
along the Mabury frontage, adjacent to the existing
recreational (equestrian) trail, staff has added a
condition that all perimeter walls shall be reviewed by the
Community Development Department,
29. The Environmental Review Board reviewed the project several
times throughout the application process, The proposed
extension of Yellowstone Boulevard south, it's intersection
with Mabury Avenue (including the equestrian trail), and the
subdivision's proposed circulation system were issues of
concern that were resolved through the review process by
revising the tract map or conditioning its approval, The
design of Yellowstone at the entrance to the site was
revised to include a landscaped median similar to the
existing medians in Yellowstone north of the site,
Inclusion of this design feature acts to tie the new
development with the existing neighborhood, as does the
direct extension of Yellowstone south of Mabury,
staff has noted that the cross section for proposed streets
A, B, and C details a sidewalk directly adjacent to the
street curb and then a parkway, The existing designs of
Mabury and Yellowstone include parkways between the curb and
sidewalk, This feature should be continued throughout the
new development, and therefore, staff has added condition 14
requiring the construction detail to be modified
accordingly, and to comply with public street minimum
standards for sidewalk and parkway widths.
30. The Municipal Water District of orange County (MWDOC) owns
and maintains the high pressure water line that traverses
the site, Potential future maintenance and repair
activities may impact property owners and may impede access
to residences within the tract development; lots 1, 12, 13,
and 16 would appear to be the most impacted by such
activities, MWDOC retains the right to remove any
facilities or improvements (such as roads, driveways and
landscaping) constructed within their easement in
conjunction with maintenance to the pipeline. Furthermore,
removal and replacement of such facilities and improvements
will be at the expense of the homeowner's association,
except in the case of public improvements such as public
roads and sidewalks.
31. Previous development proposals along the creek have
experienced difficulty in connecting to the city's sewer
system because the residential pads were designed at lower
elevations than the existing sewer system. In response to
the city's preference for gravity fed sewer lines rather
than the installation of sewer pumps, the applicant has
designed the subdivision accordingly, Lots 13 and 14 have
the lowest pad elevations of the tract, that of 422,5 feet,
The Mabury/Yellowstone sewer connection is at 413.26 feet,
and therefore positive flows can be accomplished for the
entire tract,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
9 Reso No. 8182
City of Orange that the recommendation of the Planning Commission
be upheld and that General Plan Amendment 2-93 redesignating
the subject property to the low density designation be approved
for the following
reasons:1, The proposed land use designation is the same as
that of the adjacent properties to the north, and therefore
compatible with the surrounding
properties,2, The redesignation to residential would allow for
new housing to be developed in order to satisfy the goals of
the General Plan's Housing
Element,ADOPTED this 18th day of May ,
1993.o of1!rt ci Y of
ang
ATTEST:
it' #;'~~7'7/
0t/~/ ~#/city Cler of y of
Orange I hereby certify that the
foregoing regularly adopted by the City Council
of regular meeting thereof held on the
18th the following
vote:Resolution was duly
and the City of Orange at
a of May , 1993,
by
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:COUNCIL
MEMBERS:COUNCIL
MEMBERS:COUNCIL
MEMBERS:SPURGEON. BARRERA, MAYOR BEYER. COONTZ,
MURPHY
NONE
NONE Q C2n::#'P'
4l/.City Clerkthe:YCi,~ of
Orange Reso No. 8182 SSH:
dg
lEGAL DESCRIPTION
IN ~HE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF ORANGE, AND IS DESCRIBED ASfOI,lOWS:
PI?OI'OSED TRACT NO. 14747 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF:
BE~'IYNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO HENRY SNYDER BYDEIllECORDEDINBOOK77, PAGE 22 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGElES COUNTY, CALIFOR-NIA THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES WEST 952.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 509 FEET; THENCE NORTH83IEGREESEAST760FEETTOTHEEASTBOUNDARYOFSAIDSNYDER'S LAND; THENCE NORTH 19DEREES45' EAST 5&&.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AlliN TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE9 \^. ST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN.
EXC~PTlNG THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 9827.
BE<:1INNING AT A SYCAMORE TREE MARKED "V. M.., THE SAME BEGINNING THE SOUTHEAST COR-NE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO VICTOR MONTGOMERY BY JONATHAN WATSON BYDEERECORDEDAUGUST12, 187S IN BOOK 38, PAGE 32& OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGElESCONTY, CALIFORNIA, AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 19-3/4 DEGREES EAST 17.87 CHAINS TOADITHLEADINGFROMTHESANTIAGOCREEK; THENCE, ALONG THE CENTER OF SAIDDITCH,SO TH 83 DEGREES WEST 18.50 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 55-1/2 DEGREE5 WEST8CHAINS;THE CE SOUTH 84 DEGREES WEST 7.8& CHAINS; THENCE SOUTN 61-3/4 DEGREESWEST9.50 CH INS; THENCE, LEAVING THE LINE OF
SAID DITCH, SOUTH 45-1 2 DEGREES EAST 8.78 CHAINS; THENCE NORTli 55-3/4 DEGREESEAST5.89 CHAINS; THENCE SO TH 35-1/2 DEGREES EAST 15.09 CHAINS TO
THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE CARPENTER TRA ; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY, NORTH 85DEGREESEAST15CHAINS
TO THE POI T OF BEGINNING.EXC~PTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEG NNlNG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT OFLANDCONVEYEDTOHENRYSNYDERBYDEERECORDEDJANUARY6,1881 IN BOOK 77, PAGE 22OFDEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES CO~NTY' CALIFORNIA; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES WEST14.435 CHAINS ALONG THE NORTH lIN OF SAID SNYDER'S LAND; THENCE SOUTH11.515CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES EAST 10. 2 CHAINS TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID SNYDER'SLAND; THENCE NORTH 19-3/4 DE-GRE S EAST 12.
796 CHAINS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.AL~ EXCEPTING THEREFROM, ANY PORTION INCLUDEDINTHELANDDESCRIBEDINTHEDEEDTO . E. FARNSWORTH AND OTHERS, RECORDED JANUARY 6, 1920 IN
BOOK 355, PAGE 98 OF DEE S.ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM, ANY PORTION INClUDEDINTHELANDDESCRIBEDINTHEDEEDTOCHARLESW. MORROW AND WIFE, RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1929 IN BOOK 338, PAGE 106 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND IN THE DEED TO
LEROY F. ROBINSON AND WIFE, RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1929 IN
BOOK 338, PAGE 115 OF OFFICIAL RCORDS.ALSO EXCEPTINGTHEREFROM, THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLOWS:BEG(NNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THELANDCONVEYEDTOA. B. HEINSBERGEN AND WirE BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 27, 1935 IN BOOK
748, PAGE 222 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND RUgNING THENCE NORTH 19 DEGREES 45' EAST AlONG THEEASTERLYLINEOFSAIDLAND, 334.88 FE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OFTHELANDCONVEYEDTOSULLY -MILLER CONTRACTING CO PANY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY
EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAli' LAST MENTIONED LAND, 268 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND CO VEYED TO HEINSBERGEN; THENCE NORTH85DEGREESEASTALONGSAIDSOUTHERLYLINE,550 EET, MORE
OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.ALsq EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION OFSAIDLANDDESCRIBEDINTHEDEEEDTOSTAIjIDARD-PAClFIC CORP., RECORDED AUGUST 20, 1976 IN
BOOK 11858, PAGE 164 OF OFFICIAL R((<!lRDS.LOT rB" & A PORTION or LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 9827, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 432, rAGES 1 TO S, BOTHINClUSIVE,
OF MISCEllANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS