04-08-1981 - Minutes TC CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY CO:�'A'1ISSION MEETING
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING �
April 8, 19�1 at 3:30 P.M.
AGENDA MOTION . �MINUTES
. �
F
ROLL CALL PRESENT Commissioners: G. Shaw, M. Baumann,
T. Slate, D. Smith
Staf f:
ABSENT Commissioners: D. Yarger
APPROV.AL OF MINUTES MOTION D. Smith
SECOND R. Slate
Meeting April 8,1981 AYES Unanimous
NOES
MOTION CARRIED �
- - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - _ -- - - - - - - - -
CONSENT CALENDAR
.
A. 632 W. La Veta Ave.--Request MOTION M. Baumann
for driveway clearance zone-Bill . SECOND R. Slate '
Ra.smussen b32 W. La Veta Ave. AYES Unanimous
NOES
RECOMMEND: Approve the request MOTION CARRIED
- To accept recommendations for consent
calendar �or A & B.
B. 2715 E. La Veta Ave.--Request
relo�ation of passenger loading
zone to Wheeler frontage Christ
Luthern Church 2715 E. La Veta Ave.
RECOMMEND: Approve the request
_ .
CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY COr�IISSION MEETING PAGE 2
�iINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
April 8, 1981 at 3:30 P.M.
AGENDA MOTION MINUTES
CONSIDER.ATION ITEMS -
1. Bond Ave. & Prospect St,-- 1. Mr. Kelley presented the staff report.
Request for 3-way stop controls Staff's investigation indicated that the
Normaz� R. Brock Orange Park Acres intersection did not satisfy the requirements
Mutual Water Co. 678 N. Prospect St. for insta�lation of a three-way stop. The
required signal warrants were only 40%
RECONIl�ZE�1D: Approve alternative satisfied. Field observations indicated a
discernment probTem exists for drivers on
" Bond Ave. These drivers are unable to easily
determine which vehicles southbound on Prospect
St. would be placed in jeopardy by their
vehicles entering the travel lanes on Prospect
St. Staff recommends the installation of a
left tum pocket S/B Prospect St. to aid the�
motorist in� discerning the through and left
turn movements of vehicles on Prospect St.
The recommendation would also include the
necessary warning and merge signs to safely
implement this channelization.
MOTION R. Slate
SECOND M. Baumann
AYES Unanimous
MOTION CARRIED
To accept alternative, to provide left turn
pocket for southbaund Prospect St. traffic at
Bond Ave. with pavement markings & signs for
- directing traff ic to appropiate lanes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2. Rancho Santiago Blvd. between 2. Mr. Dennis presented the staff report.
Bond Ave. & Chapman Ave. ----- There are two approaches to installing a bike
Request for school bike route Orange route. (1) is to build and install a bike
traffic section. route according to the Bike Trail standards
which can include separated paths, additional
RECONIMEND: Approve ��he request right-of-way, etc. (2) is to establish the
route within existing right of way and szmply
sign the street indicating the existance of
the bike route. The school bike route on
Rancho Santiago would be possible only
through proper signing and marking of- the
street. Rancho Santiago between Chapman Ave.
and Bond Ave. has shared jurisdiction in
certain areas between the City of Orange and
the County o f Orange, namely:
Chapman to Pearl - City
Pearl to Sycamore - County
Sycamore to Orangegrove - City
Orangegrove to Bond -St.-City
-Residences-County
•
CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY COr1MISSION MEETING PAGE 3
MINUTES OF A REGULAR �'iEETING
April 8, 1981 at 3:30 P.M.
AGENDA � MOTI�N MINUTES
CONSIDERATION ITEM ��2 CONTINUED 2. (Continued) There are three alternatiues to
the request for a school bike route on Rancho
2. Rancho Santiago Blvd. between Santiago between Chapman Ave. and Bond Ave.
Bond Ave. & Chapman Ave. ---- �
Reques� for school bike route Orange (1) No bike route
traff ic section.
(2) Establish a school bike route from
Chapman Ave. to Bond Ave..
RECOMMEND: Approve the request
(3) Establish a school bike route from
Sycamore to Bond.
Alterriative (1) Would not require any changes
� from the existing conditions.
Alterna.tive (2) Would cnnnect with the Class
I bike route that exists north
of Bond Ave. additionally, a
four way stop would need to be
established at Bond Ave. and
Rancho Santiago Blvd. and the
approval and cooperation from
the County of Orange for those
areas under their jurisdiction.
Alterna.tive (3) Wn.uld provide a school bike
route wholly within City juris-
� diction. There would be no need
- for County participation other
than the need for County app-
roval for a four-way stop at
Bond Ave. and Rancho Santiago
Blvd.
The field investigation did not indicate a
high incidence of use by the residents for the
on� street� parkirig during the hours that a
parking prohibition for bike route use would
be required. Additionaly, with the establish-
ment and implementation of the bike route,
street improvements would be completed in
those areas as yet unimproved.
� •
CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY COT�iISSION MEETING PAGE 4
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
April 8,1981 at 3;30 P.M.
AGENDA MOTION MINUTES
C�I�'SIDERATION ITEM ��2 CONTINUED �
2. Rancho Santiago Blvd. between MOTION G. Shaw
Band Ave. & Chapman Ave. ---- SECOND R. Slate �
Request for schaol bike route Orange AYES Unanimous
traffic section. -
� �- � MOTION CARRIED
RECOMMEND: Approve the request To accept the recor�nendation accepting the
concept of a marked school bike route on
Rancho Santiago between Chapman Ave. & Bond
Ave. send to council for their approval and
� theii��send"�on��to-the Cou.nty for their. action.
_ NOTE: (Due to the lack of Citizen participatio�,
� at the CTSC meeting it is recommended that
the City Clerk notice the residences on_ the
street for the public hearing.�
ADJOURNMENT 4: 12 P.M.
. Next meeting - May 13,1981