Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-18-1990 PC MinutesPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Orange June 18, 1990 Orange, California Monday - 7:00 pm PRESENT: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Joan John Jack Jere Gene Gary Mary Wolff, Sr. Planner and Commission Secretary Godlewski, Administrator of Current Planning McGee, Director of Community Development Murphy, Administrator of Advanced Planning Minshew, Assistant City Attorney Johnson, City Engineer Reilly, Recording Secretary PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IN RE: MINUTES OF JUNE 4, 1990 Commissioner Scott pointed out the correct spelling of David Freimann's name. Moved by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Commissioner Bosch that the Minutes of June 4, 1990 be approved as corrected. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED IN RE: ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED ZONE CHANGE 1126-90, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14329, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1843-90 - IRAJ MAVANDADI: A continuance is requested to July 16 on a proposal to rezone the property from C-1 to R-3, a tentative tract map for condominium purposes and a conditional use permit to allow two story development, due to a proposed modification to the project which will require revising and reissuance of the public hearing notice. Moved by Commissioner Scott, seconded Bosch, to continue Zone Change 1126-90, Tentative Tract Map 14329, Conditional Use Permit 1843-90 to July 16, 1990. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott Planning Commission MInutes June 18, 1990 IN RE: CONTINUED HEARINGS Page 2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2-90-B AND ZONE CHANGE 1127-90 - CITY OF ORANGE: Proposed modifications to zoning and the General Plan for Cypress Street and AT & SF Railroad Depot areas as follows: CvUress Street alternatives being considered: 1. Change General Plan from Low-Medium to Medium Density Residential. 2. Retain Low-Medium Density Residential 3. Rezone from R-3 (Residential Multiple Family District) and R-4 (Residential Maximum Multiple Family District) to R-2-6 (Residential Duplex District). AT & SF Railroad Depot Area Proposal: 1. Change in General Plan from industrial and general commercial to Low-Medium Density Residential and Old Towne. 2. Change zoning from M-1 (Light Industrial) and C-2 General Business District) to R-3 (Residential Multiple Family District) and C-1 (Limited Business District). Other appropriate alternative general plan and land use and zoning designations may also be considered). The subject parcels are located in an area bounded by Glassell Street on the east, Chapman Avenue on the south, Pixley Street and the AT & SF Railroad on the west, and Rose Avenue on the north. NOTE: Negative Declaration 1348-90 has been prepared for this project. This item was continued from the May 21, 1990 Planning Commission meeting and a study session on May 30, 1990. The public hearing had been closed at the May 21 meeting. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 3 Mr. Jere Murphy presented the Staff Report. At the May 21 Planning Commission hearing, several questions were raised by the Commission regarding the Study of this area. An addendum to the original report was prepared in response to those questions. This report was available at the hearing. The questions and a summary of the responses are as follows: 1. How were the boundaries established for the study? The boundaries of the Cypress Street portion of the study are the limits of the residential zoning that is inconsistent with the general plan which is also the boundary of the area historically known as the Cypress Street neighborhood. The boundaries of the Railroad Depot portion of the study was established in the Williams- Kuebelbeck study performed two years ago for the Economic Development Division. The staff and consultants expanded the two study boundaries to include a sphere of influence around the study areas so that properties directly affected by changes in use could be identified and addressed. 2. What tools are available to assist in improving residential areas without increasing densities? There are basically two programs - code enforcement and housing improvement programs. Code enforcement personnel have been working in this area on a complaint basis, but a more proactive enforcement program will hopefully be initiated. Housing programs have been marketed in the Cypress Street area with limited success. However, the Housing Section staff will continue to market these programs so that the residents in need of assistance are aware of available programs. 3. What public works projects are scheduled for the study area? Those projects currently listed in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program are: a. Completion of the widening of Chapman Avenue from Lemon to Clark Streets b. Widening of Glassell STreet from Walnut to Collins Avenues. c. Signalization of intersections of Glassell and Maple and Glassell and Palm. d. Drainage and street abandonment issue at the inter- section of Sycamore and Cypress. e. Normal street maintenance. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 4 4. Why is the Office Professional use and zone a better transitional use adjacent to residential? Office use is more compatible with residential areas because it is a use totally contained within buildings as opposed to the outdoor storage and/or processing that occurs within an industrial use. 5. What is the future of the Orange Unified School District property? The District has asked that their property be removed from this Study since future use of the property is unknown at this time. 6. How would a phasing program effect non-conforming uses and property financing. In order to avoid creating non-conforming uses that would not be easily financed, phased zone changes could occur as a follow-up to the adoption of a general plan amendment for the entire study area. Another alternative to phased zone changes would be to provide some type of property financing through Redevelopment Tax Increment Funds to those impacted property owners who have no private financing alternatives. 7. Is it appropriate to place residential use adjacent to the railroad tracks? Adequate noise buffering can occur through the design aspect of the projects. Mr. Murphy also indicated that letters had been received from Robert Baier, objecting to a proposed change in use at the northeast corner of Walnut and Cypress; from the School District requesting removal of their property from the study; from Wendell Finley in support of the Depot Study proposal while recognizing certain tenant issues; and from Daniel Slater. General Discussion Commissioner Bosch questioned the fact that the southeast corner of Lemon and Palm is designated R-4 zoning, but that proposed Alternative No. 1 retains a low-medium density. Planning Commission MInutes June 18, 1990 Page 5 Mr. Murphy indicated that the property immediately to the east of this property is zoned R-4 and that the Commission could recommend either R-3 or R-4 for this property and it would still be compatible with the area. Commissioner Bosch also asked about the potential for accommodating property financing concerns through Redevelopment Agency tax increments, and what method is available to the Commission to allow for that. Mr. Murphy stated that there would be the need for tax increment funding for relocation efforts. The Commission could recommend, in a very general statement, that the use of these funds be made available, but at this time there is no way of knowing any of the specifics, or even a guarantee of these funds. Because of this, it may require a phasing program in order to assist the land owners in converting their properties to other uses. Commissioner Greek agreed that it is not their intent to hurt the property owners, and should this General Plan be adopted, would like to see a program whereby the City could provide funds to be lent to property owners who may have to reconstruct their businesses because of a non-conforming use. He felt that the City should be willing to risk some funds if they are asking property owners to take a risk with their businesses. Commissioner Master pointed out that the funding issue could be made as part of a motion should the Commission desire. Moved by Commissioner Bosch, seconded by Commissioner Scott, to accept the findings of the Environmental Review Board with regard to Negative Declaration 1348-90 in that this project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 6 Discussion on Cypress Street area Commissioner Bosch discussed the requests from Robert Baier and the Orange Unified School District for exclusion of their properties from this study, and felt that it was appropriate to honor these requests. The remaining Commissioners all felt that the properties should not be excluded simply because the owners requested it, that there needs to be conformity to the General Plan. Commissioner Bosch then expressed the following concerns. There has been some difficulty in administering funding programs available to improve housing in this area. There has been very little change in this area despite the intensity of zoning placed upon it which may be due, in part, to the number of units that exist that are not fully permitted at this time. The code enforcement staff is doing a good job in this area, but there needs to be an intensified City community relations effort to see that funds are available for code compliance and housing assistance. The problems that exist are not due just to illegal or non-conforming uses but also in part to the very density; and would like to see the neighborhood structure preserved in this part of town. He felt that the area should remain primarily low/medium density and not increased to medium density, and that the majority of the westerly portion of the study area near the industrial area should be zoned R-2-6. He expressed concern with the current RCD overlay concept, that it needs further study and modification, that it is not applied uniformly throughout the Old Towne area. He would prefer to see the zoning stand alone without having to refer back to an overlay zone. He also felt that the properties in the north and northeast section should be zoned R-2-6 east of the lots facing Cypress. The area south of the School District office, and the School District property itself, creates another problem in that although there is some low density residential in that area there is also the high probability of the Anaconda area being of higher density (with high density pockets east of Lemon south of Palm). He does not perceive the probability of a request occurring to put single family residential on the large school district property. Perhaps that could be some sort of transitional zoning. Concern that there is not enough differentiation between R-3 and R- 4 that the R-4 can be eliminated; and there should be sufficient designation in order to look at some blend between R-2-6 and R-3 in that area. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 7 Commissioner Greek explained that what the Commission seems to be looking for is a tool to upgrade the area, one of those tools being code enforcement. The tools that are available to the City are either extremely tough enforcement or the General Plan to upgrade the densities. Re-zoning has been successful in the past and has resulted in some of the upgrading in the Old Towne area. The majority of construction, and thus the upgrading, in Old Towne has been the result of additional units constructed in the back of properties. This Cypress Street area has unique problems and he would like to keep the character of the single family residences but see them upgraded. Would like to see the area upgraded over a long period of time without destroying lifestyles. This has happened in Old Towne, with great success. Higher density is not a necessity, but a goal and the tool to make this area work. Commissioner Bosch agreed that code enforcement is a necessity, but another method of assuring upgrading is to insure housing assistance programs are available for lower densities as well as higher densities. Concerned with going to higher densities without first attempting a full scale code enforcement program. Commissioner Greek felt that code enforcement is not enough that there are too many things to "cure" in this area; that we would be driving out people by the block if only a code enforcement program is initiated without higher densities. Commissioner Master would like to see the community come forward and be effective in organizing an interest in upgrading the neighborhood, somewhat like a self policing effort inasmuch as the City can provide only so many hours of code enforcement. It would be beneficial to see the same response in this neighborhood that has come out of Old Towne. Would also like to see the housing grants become an effective tool as well as a greater interest in the community. He stated he is leaning toward lower density to give the residents a pride in the area - that the City is willing to help them improve their neighborhood but that they have to be willing to help themselves also. Commissioner Scott felt that there was already a lot of pride of ownership in the area and that a higher density would ruin the neighborhood; that there were some code violations in the area, but it will take some time to correct everything. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 8 Commissioner Bosch asked if the area is downzoned, how can the Commission monitor the area to see if there is sufficient response from the neighborhood to solving its own problems. Mr. Murphy stated that staff can make periodic reports to the Commission on what effect any change would be as well as status reports on code enforcement and housing assistance programs. The Commission would also have opportunity to review any future plans. Commissioner Scott asked if the square footage in an R-2 lot would permit more than two units? Mr. Murphy responded that the R-2 district allows for 1 dwelling unit per 3,000 sq ft of land, i.e., on a 9,000 sq ft lot, three units could be allowed. Commissioner Bosch stated that after several status reports in this area, if there is no movement, the various agencies in the City can then take a hard look at each of the programs. Even if the programs are available, they need to work. Commissioner Greek expressed concern that with only a strict code enforcement program we may end up hurting the very people we're trying to help. There are people living in areas that we may not like but it is better for them than anything else available for the price. Consequently there is a social problem that we're trying to solve. If we set up a system of reviewing the area with the idea that we may up-zone in the future it will create a see-saw effect which is a real mistake. We need to take a hard look at it right now and make a determination of what zoning we feel will last for at least a five year period, and give it a chance to evolve rather than thinking we can always change it in a year or two. Moved by Commissioner Bosch,seconded by Commissioner Scott, the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council to maintain low/medium density residential General Plan designation for these properties including the northeast corner of Walnut and Cypress and the OUSD property; and that Alternative No. 3 be approved to rezone from R-3 (Residential Multipl e Family District) and R-4 Residential Maximum Multiple Family District) to R-2-6 Residential Duplex District),but that no RCD overlay be included. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Master, Scott NOES: Commissioners Greek MOTION CARRIED Planning Commission MInutes June 18, 1990 Page 9 Discussion on AT & SF Railroad Depot Area Commissioner Bosch expressed concern about the proposed change on the east side of Pixley, currently M-l. It appears that we have a fairly good working relationship between the existing residential on the west side of Pixley and the M-1 on the east side, and is of the opinion that we should retain that M-1 for a while. If the remainder of the Depot planning area comes along as hoped for, the upgrading of the property, or the change in its use, might want to occur and the property owners could come back to the Commission through their own volition to see that change occur. On both alternatives, the property west of the ATSF right of way and north of Maple Street is indicated for R-3 low/medium density residential. That appears to be a relatively functional low density light industrial area at this time and don't see any reason to change that right now from M-1, except on the south side of Palm. He again expressed a concern about the lack of guarantees for funding assistance for mortgages and property improvements, and would like to be able to incorporate that into a motion which could give the plan the strength it needs. Commissioner Greek discussed the proposed parking lot on the east side of Pixley, north of Chapman, and that its purpose is to provide parking in the commercial area, but if the area remains M-1 then there is no real need for the parking lot. It could be rezoned M-1, or something compatible, if the Commission does indeed decide to keep the property M-1. He felt that ultimately the M-1 property will redevelop commercial and as such will need the parking next to it to make it a viable use. It poses a dilemma -- leaving the property M-1 and yet recommending a parking lot adjacent to it. Commissioner Bosch suggested an interim use with the intent that it be established to support the ultimate commercial development Mr. Murphy stated that one way of dealing with the issue is to use the intent to re-zone process as part of the phasing program to accommodate the concerns with regard to refinancing and mortgages. However, the preference is to not get into phasing of zone changes but to set the zone at this time and assist people through the Redevelopment AGency funds to refinance or for short term loans. This is much less clouded in terms of the Resolution of Intent process which has been used in the past in some very unique ways. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 10 In terms of parking on west side of the railroad tracks the Railroad is very interested in selling that property so it could be used, along with the Depot, to augment the parking that would otherwise have to be provided on the east side of the RR tracks as a part of that project. That particular piece of property is very much an asset to the Depot revitalization. Moved by Commissioner Greek, seconded by Commissioner Bosch, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council Alternative No. 1, a mixture of residential, commercial and public use, provided that the City Council is able to provide long term property financing through Redevelopment Agency tax increment funds to those impacted property owners who have no private financing alternatives because of non-conforming usage. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED Commissioner Greek clarified that his motion is a recommendation that the City Council establish a fund of the dollars necessary to reconstruct all the buildings that exist in the current area that could become non-conforming. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1836-90 - RIDGELINE COUNTRY CLUB: A proposed Conditional Use Permit to allow the erection of 25 light standards with a total of 40 lights over an existing golf course and driving range on property located at 1051 Meads Avenue Note: Negative Declaration 1341-90 has been prepared for this project. was continued from the June 4, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Greek excused himself from the hearing due to a conflict of interest. The public hearing had been closed at the June 4 meeting. Planning Commission MInutes June 18, 1990 Page 11 Ms. Wolff reviewed the staff report for this project. At the previous hearing a number of issues were raised, although a primary concern seems to be the impact of errant golf balls on some of the adjacent property owners. The Commission requested that staff and the applicant address this particular issue and asked that the applicant meet with the neighbors to further assess the problem and to explore potential mitigating measures especially with regard to three distinct areas around the site. A summary of those mitigating measures is as follows: Driving Ranae - Instituting higher level tee positions; restring netting to minimize already implemented). an "iron only" policy at the install distance markers; and sag (which the applicant has Second Hole, north property line - moving the tee northerly and the hole southerly, as well as constructing a sand trap on the northerly side of the fairway, thus encouraging players to aim southerly and away from the northern property line; establishing a "drop area" west of the water hazard; and recable existing nets (which the applicant has already implemented). Third Hole, westerly property line - eliminate the two easterly tees, shifting the players' aim toward the center of the course; extend the existing screen at the tee and position it at an angle inward toward the course; and remove an existing tree located on he easterly side of the fairway. Additional correspondence was received from Mr. Bill Reinking dated June 18th and from Mr. David Freimann dated June 18th. Commissioner Master commended the Applicant, Mr. David Freimann for committing himself to several significant course changes and improvements that should benefit the adjoining neighbors. Commissioner Scott noted that he had met with Mrs. Mara Brandman at the site to review the project. Mr. David Freimann, 1051 Meads, Orange, reviewed the meetings he has had with the surrounding property owners; indicating he had met with Dr. Endorka earlier that day; that he had met with Mr. Hamilton and assured him that it would not be necessary to increase the height of the poles Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 12 at the bottom of his property line (which was his major concern); that he had met the previous Saturday with several neighbors on Acre Place to discuss mitigating measures specifically on the second hole where he has made the most severe changes. The measures they have instituted should more than resolve the anticipated problems with the night lighting of the course as well as take care of the normal daytime problems of errant golf balls. Commissioner Bosch stated that many of these measures are housekeeping" matters that should occur in any event. Commissioner Master commented that he has visited the site, as well as played the course several times, and it seems that Mr. Freimann has gone to great lengths to take care of these "housekeeping" matters. He expressed concern, however, about the lighting specifically with regard to the effect the lighting would have on the traffic along Meads and at the entrance to the course. Commissioner Scott commented that he has also visited the site numerous times and noted that at the tennis courts there are eight lights per court and has never heard of any complaint due to these lights; and that perhaps lighting could be placed to enhance the road without being offensive to the neighbors. Commissioner Master also commented that he was surprised that no complaints had been received about the tennis court lighting; and personally found that lighting to be more offensive than that which is proposed for the golf course. Commissioner Bosch posed the question, "where do we draw the line" -- when does a selective occasional intrusion become a permanent intrusion, not just in terms of lighting but also with the additional people at the course at night and the reduction of beneficial use that the neighbors have of their yards. He was unconvinced that additional hours and lighting won't be detrimental to the surrounding area. Commissioner Scott pointed out that the only other lit golf course was in Newport Beach and that there were very expensive homes on the peripheral of this course, and it doesn't seem to be detrimental. He also stated that he had reviewed the petitions and letters they had received on this issue -- the signatures totaling approximately 547, and noted that many of these individuals felt this proposal would be a benefit to the area. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 13 Moved by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Commissioner Master, to accept the findings of the Environmental REview Board with regard to Negative DEclaration 1341-90 in that with the addition of the mitigating measures, the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. AYES: Commissioners Master, Scott NOES: Commissioners Bosch MOTION CARRIED Moved by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Commissioner Master, to approve Conditional Use Permit 1836-90 subject to the conditions outlined in the Staff Report. AYES: Commissioners Scott NOES: Commissioners Bosch, Master MOTION FAILED Commissioner Master noted that his second of the motion was only to initiate a vote. The decision of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed by the Applicant. There is a 15 day appeal period, and if appealed, the City Council will make the final determination. IN RE: NEW HEARINGS MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1002 - THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION: A proposed modification of an existing condition of an approved Conditional Use Permit (No. 1002) to allow a change in operational procedures from a pre-pay to a post- pay gasoline pumping method. Subject property is located on the northwest corner of Palmyra Avenue and Main Street 290 S. Main Street). Note: This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines. Section 15301. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 14 The public hearing was opened. Mr. Steve Jones, Market Manager, Southland Corporation, 120 S. State College Blvd., Brea, spoke on the subject request. He stated that a post-pay operation is more convenient to their customers, and that they have not experienced any problems with other gasoline stations of this type, i.e., customers driving off without paying. Should that occur, however, they plan to be their own regulatory agency and will not involve the Police Department. This is strictly a procedural change they would like to initiate, if even for a test period. The Commission discussed the fact that the original concern of this proposal was with Crime Prevention; and the fact that other post-pay stations in Orange seem to be set up with the station attendant more closely monitoring the gas pumps. Mr. Scott McCook, Field Consultant, Southland Corporation, 120 S. State College Blvd., Brea, stated that their service stations are under constant review and should a post-pay operation be abused and a crime problem occur, the system would be pulled. The service station attendant will be located in the same area as originally set up but will have the capability of being able to switch the pumps on and off should anything suspicious occur. Their other stations utilizing this type of system, as well as the customers, have all seem to benefited. The public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Greek, seconded by Commissioner Scott, that the modification to Conditional Use Permit 1002 to allow a change in operational procedures from a pre-pay to a post-pay gasoline pumping method be approved. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED Planning Commission MInutes June 18, 1990 Page 15 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1837, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 90-13 - ROBERT A. DE FAZIO: A proposal to construct two units which exceed one story in height on property in the Residential Combining District combining an existing single family residence; and a proposal for the addition of a covered porch to the existing residence with less than the Code required front yard setback. Subject property located at 612 S. Orange Street. Note: Negative Declaration 1342-90 has been prepared for this project. Ms. Wolff presented the staff report. This property is located within the Old Towne Historic District and currently developed with an existing 1-1/2 story residence. The request is for the construction of two 2-story units onto the rear of the existing structure, consisting of garages on the first level with the 2 living areas above. The proposed structure consists of a 670 sq. ft. studio unit and an 830 sq. ft. 2 bedroom unit. The applicant is also proposing the addition of a porch cover to the entire width of the front of the existing residence. The surrounding properties are single story residences and properties throughout the neighborhood are also predominately single story residences. The public hearing was open. Applicant Mr. Robert De Fazio, 612 S. Orange Street, reported that they have designed this project in keeping with the Design Review Board guidelines; that the property is zoned for three units; and that there are numerous projects in the area that are similar to the proposal. He stated that his architect was available for any other questions. Those speaking in opposition Mr. Michael Stastny, 649 S. Orange Street Mr. Larry Lopez, 629 S. Orange Street Ms. Lorna McCandless, 205 E. River Avenue Mr. John Reimis, 130 E. River Avenue Mr. Mark Upton, 126 E. River Avenue Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 16 Their concerns were as follows: The proposed project is too massive for the neighborhood; the six proposed parking spaces will allow for too many cars; the height of this property would be too high for the surrounding neighborhood which is predominately single story; it would set a bad precedent for the area which is in the Old Towne District; and would be an invasion of privacy to the neighbors directly adjacent to the property; The public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Bosch, seconded by Commissioner Scott, to support the findings of the Environmental Review Board with regard to Negative Declaration 1342-90 in that this project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED Moved by Commissioner Greek, seconded by Commissioner Scott, to deny Conditional Use Permit 1837-90 and Administrative Adjustment 90-13 for the reasons outlined in the Staff Report. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED Ms. Wolff explained this decision is final unless appealed. There is a 15 day appeal period and if appealed, the City Council will make the final determination. NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1336-90 - CITY OF ORANGE An environmental assessment of a proposed public works project to widen the Loma Street bridge at Santiago Creek, and the approaching roadways, from their existing two-lane configuration to a four-lane roadway. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 1990 Page 17 Mr. Gary Johnson, City Engineer, gave a brief staff report on the subject project, stating that the widening of the roadway will not have any short or long term affects on the environment and that the widening is in conformance with the General Plan. Moved by Commissioner Bosch, seconded by Commissioner Scott, to accept the findings of the Environmental REview Board with regard to Negative DEclaration 1336-90 in that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED IN RE: ADJOORNMENT Moved by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Commissioner Bosch, that the Planning Commission adjourn to the meeting of July 16, 1990. AYES: Commissioners Bosch, Greek, Master, Scott NOES: None MOTION CARRIED The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. mmr