04-21-1992 Council MintuesCITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OF A REGULAR MEETING
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA
Apri121,1992
The City Council of the City of Orange, California convened on Apri121, 1992 at 3:00
P.M. in a Regular Meeting in the Council Chambers, 300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange,
California.
3:00 P.M. SESSION
1. OPENING
1.1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
1.2 ROLL CALL
PRESENT - Steiner, Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon ABSENT -
None 1.3
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - None 1.4 PRESENTATIONS/
ANNOUNCEMENTS/INTRODUCTIONS - None 1.5 PROCLAMATIONS - None
2. CONSENT CALENDAR - Tape 40
2.1 Declaration of City Clerk
Marilyn J. Jensen declaring posting of City Council agenda of a regular meeting of
April 21, 1992, at Orange Civic Center, Main Library, Police facility at 1107 North
Batavia and the Eisenhower Park Bulletin Board; all of said locations being
in the City of Orange and freely accessible to members of the public at least
72 hours before commencement of said regular meeting.ACTION: Accepted declaration of Agenda
Posting
and authorized its retention as a public record in the
Office of the City Clerk.REMOVED AND HEARD SEP ARA TEL
Y)2.2 Award of Bid 912-
27 for seven 1992 Police sedans to Mills Ford, Anaheim, CA, in the amount of $98,529.
00, and reject all other bids. Funding: 720-1331-472102 Vehicle Replacement Fund). (
Cont. from April 14, 1992) (A2100.0 A.1938)PAGEl
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21,1992
2. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
Councilman Spurgeon questioned whether they have the discretion to award a
bid to a local business, when the cost differential is not significant. The City
Attorney reported Council does not have that discretion as the Code is currently
written.
Council directed the City Attorney to return with a report on changing the Code
to allow them more discretion in this regard, in the interest of saving local
businesses, who are struggling in the current economy. Councilwoman Coontz
mentioned there was full discussion on this policy in April, 1991 when this was
revised as a result of the Management Audit Committee. Council felt this policy
was appropriate at that time, but the economy is different now and Council feels
an obligation to save jobs in the City.
The Director of General Services cautioned Council that in the professional
purchasing business, competitiveness is the name of the game. Vendors become
discouraged when preference is given to local vendors and may decide not to
bid in the future, which may raise costs. Councilwoman Coontz stated this was
the reason the Code was changed last year.
MOTION - Spurgeon SECOND -
Steiner A YES -
Steiner, Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon Moved to direct
the City Attorney to return to Council with a report on changing the Orange Municipal Code
to reflect some discretionary power on the part of the Council in awarding bids, to
given preference to businesses within the City.MOTION - Steiner SECOND -
Coontz A YES -
Steiner, Barrera, Mayor
Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon ACTION: Approved.REMOVED AND HEARD SEPARATELY)
2.3
Authorize receipt and allocation
of $9,568.00 in Federal Library Services and Construction Act Funds, administered by the
California State Library, for the purchase of major urban resources library
materials to Account 200-2011-443101-9906. (C2S00.I)PAGE
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21,1992
2. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
Councilwoman Coontz complimented the Library Director on obtaining this
grant of state funds.
MOTION - Coontz SECOND -
Steiner AYES - Steiner,
Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon ACTION: Approved.2.
4 Request
authorizationto approve additional funding for a Deferred Payment Loan, and authorize
the City Treasurer to Prepare a check in the amount of 22,000.00,
Case # 502, Fund # 315-6052-810-801 DPL (Community Development
Block Grant Program). (C2S00.G.l.l)
ACTION: Approved.
REMOVED AND HEARD SEP ARA TEL Y)
2.5 Approve an agreement with the Orange Community Historical Society for the
City to receive and hold funds donated by the Historical Society for the
development of the Local History Collection and the building and furnishing of
a Local History Room in the proposed new Main Library. (A2100.0 A.1949)
MOTION - Coontz SECOND -
Spurgeon AYES - Steiner,
Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon ACTION: Authorized the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute on behalf of the City.2.6 Request
for a handicapped parking stall, blue curb, in front of 531 N. Orange St.54000.0.5.
3.1.1)ACTION: Approved.2.
7 Request
for the establishment of a 40 MPH Speed Zone on Crawford Canyon Road between Chapman
Ave. and its northerly terminus. (54000.5.3.4)ACTION: Approved.2.
8 Request
to add Jamboree Rd. from Santiago Canyon Rd. to the south City limits to the City
Truck Route System. (S4000.5.3.9)PAGE 3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 1992
2. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
ACTION: Approved.
2.9 Request for a City ordinance under California Vehicle Code Section 22507.2 to
allow, by permit, the property owner or tenant to block his/her driveway with a
vehicle. (S4000.5.3.1.1)
ACTION: Denied.
REMOVED AND HEARD SEP ARA TEL Y)
2.10 Request to install, 1 Hour Limited Parking 7 A.M. - 5 P.M., Saturday, Sunday and
Holidays Excluded, on both sides of Eckhoff St. from Chapman Ave. to Willow
Ave., Arbor Way and Maple Ave. from Stevens St. to Holly St.54000.
5.3.1.1)Council
asked the Community Development Director if there is anything in the Zoning
Code to address schools in commercial zones. He indicated a CUP is not required
for trade schools in commercial zones. There is a parking requirement based
upon the number of students. The school has not been cooperative relative
to limiting the number of students, and Code Enforcement has been working
on this problem. Council felt the school should be made to comply.Council
asked the Traffic Engineer if this area would be a candidate for permit parking.
He felt this would be trying to solve a Code Enforcement problem with a
Traffic solution.The
following people spoke in opposition:Sidney
Liptz, 518 Royal St., Anaheim, owner of property on Maple Street.Dan
Rudat, 2010 Arbor Way.Ton
Bui, President of MTI College, 2011 W. Chapman Avenue.Julia
Araiza, owner of apartments at 232-254 N. Holly Street.
Marilyn Silverstein, owner of apartments at 231-263 N. Holly
Street.Lorena Rudat, 2019 W. Chapman
Avenue.David Shaffer, 2028 W. Arbor
Way.The following points were
made:They do not feel there is a parking problem on Maple during the time
proposed.
Installing time limitations will merely move the problem to other residential streets
in the area.They
feel the City should enforce a limitation on number of students at the school.PAGE
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 1992
2. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
Having a parking limitation in the area will be an inconvenience for the residents
in the area.Two
petitions were presented to Council. However, one petition was presented
a majority in favor of the proposal and the other was presented with a majority
in opposition which Council felt was confusing.The
owner of the school is looking for another location.Putting the
signs up and then removing them would not be a wise use of City money.This
is
a Code Enforcement issue, rather than one of Traffic control.The school claims
they don't want to be a burden to the City and are working diligently at finding
another location with more parking. They are losing students because of
these problems.The school is
paying students $25.00 per month to park outside the school,which is a
burden.The apartments in
the area have only one space per unit. The residents need to use the on-
street parking if they have more than one vehicle.Many businesses
require their employees to park elsewhere, like on the street.The following
people spoke in favor:Elsa Blazivic,
4239 Ranch Gate, owner of property at 2027 Arbor Way.George Calafat,
2027 W. Arbor Way.David Yinger,
2020 W. Maple Street.They made
the following points:Arbor Way
is a cui de sac and people take pride in their property. Having all the cars parked
on the street decreases the value of the property. The one hour parking is a
good solution to this problem.This parking problem
has gone on for 3-4 years. It is a hazard trying to pull out from Arbor
Way to Eckhoff Street.The neighbors in
the area should not be subject to the whims of the school.The Code Enforcement Officer
reported Ton Bui, President of MTI School is under notice, and was
granted a 60-day extension by their department, because he presented legal
documents indicating he was attempting to move. They felt it was in
the City's best interest to grant the 60 days. On May 22, he will be cited,if he is
not moved. At that time, a court date will be given 30 days after that, at which he will
have to appear. This is a misdemeanor.PAGE S
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 1992
2. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
MOTION - Coontz SECOND -
Spurgeon A YES -
Steiner, Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon ACTION: Denied request
for the one hour limited parking on the basis of the action taking place
by Code Enforcement. The Community Development Department is requested
to look at changes to the Zoning Code to include a Conditional Use Permit
for schools located in commercial zones. The parking situation is to
be re-examined at a later date, after the school has vacated, to determine whether
the one hour parking should be instituted.2.11
Request to change the existing parking restrictions on Handy St. in proximity to Handy Elementary
School from No Parking 7:30-9:00 A.M. and 2:30-4:00 P.M.,
and implement No Parking 7:30-9:00 A.M. and 2:00-4:00 P.M. (S4000.s.3.
1.1)
ACTION: Approved.2.12 Request for the installation of protected left-turn phasing at
the intersection of Collins Ave. andWanda Rd. (S4000.
s.3.
3)ACTION: Denied.2.13 Request approval for Orange Police Department to enter into
an agreement with the Mall of Orange for facilities use forC.O.P.s. Expo '92
and authorize Police Chief Merrill Duncan, or in his absence his designee, to sign
agreement on behalf of the department and the City. (A2100.0
A.1372.D)Fiscal Impact: $3,400.00 from Fund
100-4011-
42600 (Police Administration)ACTION: Approved.2.14 CLAIM
FOR DAMAGES FROM: (C3200.0)Blanca Bishop for an alleged incident occurring on
or about March 12, 1992.ACTION: Denied claim and referred
to City Attorney and Adjuster.2.15 Request for temporary suspension of Permit
Parking restrictions (AreaA -Chapman University). (S4000.5.
3.1.
2.1)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21,1992
2. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
MOTION
SECOND
AYES
Spurgeon
Barrera Steiner,
Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon Items 2.
2, 2.3, 2.5 and2.10 were removed and heard separately. All other items on the Consent Calendar
were approved/ denied as recommended.END OF
CONSENT CALENDAR 3. REPORTS
FROM MAYOR BEYER - None 4. REPORTS FROM
COUNCILMEMBERS - None 5. REPORTS FROM BOARDS,
COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS - None 6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS - None 7.
REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER - None
8. LEGAL AFFAIRS - Tape 2650 8.1
ORDINANCE NO. 5-92 An Ordinance
of the City Council of
the City of Orange amending Section 17.06.020 of the Orange Municipal Code and approving the
reclassification of property situated at the northeast corner of Chapman Avenue and
Wayfield Street from the C-l (Limited Business) District to the C-2 (
General Business) District. (ZIS00.0 No. 1141-91)Zone Change 1141-91 -
Robert A. Smith MOTION SECOND AYES Barrera
Steiner
Steiner,
Barrera,
Mayor Beyer,
Coontz, Spurgeon
That Ordinance No. 5-92 have second
reading waived and be adopted and same was passed and adopted by the preceding
vote.PAGE 7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21,1992
8. LEGAL AFFAIRS (Continued)
8.2 RESOLUTION NO. 7981
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange amending the 1991-92
Fiscal Year Budget and the Professional, Technical and Clerical Unit Resolution No. 7614
to reflect an adjustment in the salary for the classification of Library Systems
Coordinator Position No. 1325) from Range 349 ($2033-$2607) to Range 368 ($2235-$2866). (C2S00.
I)
MOTION
SECOND
AYES
Coontz Barrera
Steiner, Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon That
Resolution No. 7981 as introduced be adopted and same was passed and adopted by
the preceding vote.9.
RECESS TO THE MEETING OF THE ORANGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 10.
ORAL PRESENTATIONS Santiago
Creek Bond Issue:Carole
Walters, 534 N. Shaffer Street, asked how the Council plans to reach the public with
information on both sides of the issue for this measure, which is on the June 2,1992
ballot. The City Clerk reported every registered voter will receive a sample ballot with
the arguments. The Community Development Department is preparing an inforn1ation
sheet, which they intend to distribute to the groups who have an active interest
in this bond issue. They will also try to disseminate this information to the public
through the Public Information Officer. The information sheets will also be available
at public counters throughout City offices. Council felt a small table could be published
in the newspaper, with the costs involved. Council directed the Public Information
Officer to prepare a neutral press release in cooperation with the Director of
Community Development, with all the facts involved on both sides.PAGE
S
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21,1992
11. RECESS
The City Council recessed to a Closed Session for the following purposes:
a. To confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit:
Manuel Pomales vs. City of Orange, Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 63 78 SO
City of Orange vs, Steven D. Wymer, et at United States District
Court Case No. 92 2141 SVW
b. To confer with its attorney to decide whether to initiate litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section S49S6.9(c).
c. To meet and give directions to its authorized representative regarding labor
relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6.
d. To confer with its attorney regarding potential litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 549S6.9(b)(1).
e. To consider and take possible action upon personnel matters pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957.
f. To consider and take possible action upon such other matters as are orally
announced by the City Attorney, City Manager, or City Council prior to such
recess unless the motion to recess indicates any of the matters will not be
considered in closed session.
7:00 P.M. SESSION
12. INVOCATION
Mr. Paul Pursell, Past President of the Chamber of Commerce
12.1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
12.2 ANNOUNCEMENTS - None 12.
3 INTRODUCTIONS - None PAGE 9
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21,1992
12.4 PROCLAMATIONS - None 12.
5 PRESENTATIONS Presentation
of Business & Industry Beautification Awards for the 3rd and 4th Quarter of
1991: (OR1800.0.8.6)The
winners are as follows:Commercial:
El Torito Mexican Restaurant 3520
The City Way Ristorante
Genovese 214
N. Tustin Street Industrial:
Main & Taft Associates 1645
N. Brian Street Batavia
Palms Bus. Centre 2322-
2328 N. Batavia St.
Non-Profit: St. John's Lutheran
Church 154 S. Shaffer
Street Central Orange County
YWCA 146 N. Grand
Street Office:Chaarani & Associates,
Inc.3745 W. Chapman
Avenue Global Van Lines,
Inc.2301 N. Glassell
Street Refurbished: Gary and Laura
Jaquith 503 S. Glassell
Street Creative
Cakes 145 N. Lemon
Street 13. PUBLIC
HEARINGS 13.1 APPEAL NO. 398, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
1939-91,GRADY HANSHAW:
Tape 1-3448 Time set for a public hearing on petition by Grady Hanshaw to appeal
the decision by the Planning Commission on February 3, 1992, approving Conditional
Use Permit No.1939-91 to allow the operation of an automatic car wash and hand
detailing of cars in the C-1 (Limited Business) District. The appellant is
appealing a condition imposed by the Planning Commission. The project site is located at
the southwest corner of Katella Avenue and Main
Street. (A4000.0 No. 398)NOTE: This project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per
State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301.APPELLANT STATES THE
FOLLOWING REASONS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 1992
13. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
The site plan for this project was developed over a two-month period,
working cooperatively with the Planning, Building and Traffic Engineering staffs. The
Planning Commission arbitrarily deleted Conditions No. 23, 24, and 25, and added a
condition prohibiting access to Katella Avenue. The success of this retail/service business
is dependent upon access to Katella A venue. Therefore, we wish to appeal the
Planning Commission
decision."NOTE: A letter was received April 10, 1992 from Grady Hanshaw requesting
to withdraw the
appeal.The City Attorney announced the appeal was withdrawn for the benefit of anyone
in the audience present, wishing to speak on this
item.13.2 APPEAL NO. 397, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
1946-91,JOHN S. OTTEMAN:
Tape 1-3481 Time set for a public hearing on petition by John S. Otteman to appeal
the decision by the Planning Commission on January 20, 1992, denying Conditional
Use Permit No.1946-91, to allow a billiard entertainment facility with
an associated restaurant serving beer and wine in the CTR (Commercial
Tustin Redevelopment) District. Subject property contains three irregularly shaped parcels of land, with
a combined area of approximately 28,980 sq. ft., located on the west side
of Santiago Boulevard between Lincoln Avenue and Robinhood Place (2688 Santiago Boulevard). (
A4000.0 No. 397)NOTE: This project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301.APPELLANT STATES THE FOLLOWING
REASONS FOR THE APPEAL:1) Extreme bias - the Planning Commission had pre-conceived ideas
of pool halls and did not give me a fair hearing. 2) The Planning Commission ignored
the staff report in their first reason for rejection. Staff report finds, "Staff
anticipates that the Newport Freeway located west of the project site will mask significant
traffic and patron noise generated from the project site." 3) The Commission obviously did
not read the intentof CTR Zoning 17.43.01 0 Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the
CTR District is to provide an area for limited commercial uses which will serve the
demand for a wide variety of goods and services in the Tustin
Redevelopment Project. The Economic Development Division staff indicated that an infusion of
high quality
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
13. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
APRIL 21, 1992
evening activities is needed in the Tustin Street Redevelopment Project Area. That is
my goal."
The Manager of Current Planning indicated the Planning Commission felt the use
could have a detrimental effect on the surrounding and adjacent land uses. Noise,
lights, late-night activities in the outdoor parking area were all a concern, as well as
the general incompatibility with planning adjacent commercial uses. The Applicant
has responded by suggesting a modification of the application from 41, which is a
family-type restaurant serving beer and wine, to a 42 license, which is strictly age 21 and
over.He feels this might eliminate the problem with kids hanging out in the parking lot
and playing 'boom boxes', which was cited as a potential
problem.Council questioned whether the number of parking spaces were adequate for this
use.The Current Planning Manager indicated it does meet Code requirements, but they
are not sure if the parking will be sufficient, since they have had very little experience
with this type of entertainment
use.The Appellant, John S. Otteman, 9842 Windsor Avenue, Westminster, addressed
the Council in favor of the appeal. He made the following
points:There are two bowling alleys, and a movie theatre in the Tustin Redevelopment
area.All of them are directly adjacent to
residential.The homes are 175 feet from the proposed site.
Staff found the Newport freeway would mask any noise coming from the project site.
There will be security patrolling the parking lots.The
type of clientele they are expecting is not what most people think. Current upscale pool
halls have much higher calibre of clientele than what has been associated with pool
halls in the past.In the
immediate area of the proposed location there are 3 gas stations.The Police Crime
Prevention unit has helped come up with conditions that will insure it is not
a nuisance and that it is compatible with the immediate neighborhood and the surrounding community.40%
of all
pool players are women. Pool has come into its own as a class act.The City Attorney asked
Mayor Beyer if the proposed site is within 2,500 feet of property he owns and
whether the approval of this project would affect his property values by $10,000
plus or minus. It was questionable whether this was the case, but Mayor Beyer disqualified himself
in the interest of caution. The meeting was turned over to Mayor Pro
Tem Barrera.MAYOR PRO TEM BARRERA
OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING.PAGE 12
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 1992
13, PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
The following also spoke in favor of the appeal:
David Maidment, 3800 Bradford St., La Verne, Pres. and owner of World of Leisure
Mfg. Co., and Pres. Billiard Congress of America.
Robin Bell, 10582 Ritter Street, Cypress.
The following people spoke in opposition to the appeal:
Gail Monaco, 2140 E. Vista Canyon Road.
Charlotte Brady, 2706 Vista Bluff.
Tom Davis, 2204 E. Vista Canyon Rd.
Ron Brookins, 2733 N. Vista Knoll Rd.
Mohammad Hassan, 2602 Vista Point Dr.
Edmond Stoops, 2706 N. Vista Glen Rd.
Jack Bixby, 2668 N. Vista Glen Rd.
Mrs. Richard Showfelt, 2035 E. Vista Royale.
Joe Zine, 2209 E. Vista Mesa Way, President of Vista Royale Homeowners' Assn.
R. O. Robinson, 2735 N. Vista Crest.
Harry Trivedi, 2145 E. Vista Canyon Rd.
Bob Bennyhoff, 10642 Morada Drive.
They made the following points:
The other entertainment facilities are on Tustin Avenue, which is a more appropriate
location.
They are not opposed to a pool facility, but they feel this location is inappropriate.
The traffic on Santiago Blvd. is a serious problem, and this will add to it.
Parking is a serious problem, because there is no place for overflow parking. The
Vista Royale residents fear the overflow parking will come into their neighborhood.
Changing the liquor license to over 21 years of age is worse than the first proposal.
Even Staff cannot make a determination that the noise would be masked by the
freeway, unless a noise analysis is done.
The noise on Santiago is much worse than the freeway noise.This
facility would decrease property values in the Vista Royale tract.Where
will the people go who get turned away from entrance from the pool hall.The
residents are concerned about the safety of the children in their neighborhood,where
traffic is already a problem.They
feel the Appellant did get a fair hearing by the Planning Commission, they just didn'
t rule in his favor.There
is no such thing as masking noise.THERE BEING
NO FURTHER SPEAKERS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.PAGE 13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 1992
13. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
MOTION
SECOND
AYES
Coontz
Spurgeon
Steiner, Barrera, Coontz, Spurgeon CEQA
Finding: This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.Mayor
Beyer disqualified himself from voting pursuant to the advice of the City Attorney.
MOTION
SECOND
AYES
Coontz
Spurgeon Steiner,
Barrera, Coontz,
Spurgeon Moved to deny the
appeal, based on the fact that the proposed entertainment use on this site is inappropriate
for the reasons indicated by the Planning Commission, of late night noise and proximity
to residential, plus the parking inadequacy and the traffic problems. The proposed use
is incompatible with planned adjacent commercial uses.13.3 PRE-ZONE
CHANGE 1148-92, (ANNEXATION NO. 402)KEITH W.
NAYLOR: Tape 1-6690 Time
set for a public hearing on petition by Keith W. Naylor to consider Pre-Zone
Change 1148-92 from County E4-1 (Small Estate Residential, one acre
minimum lot size) to City R-I-40 (Residential-Single Family District, one
acre minimum lot size) to facilitate annexation of a County unincorporated property
to the City of Orange.Subject property is located on the south side of Meads
A venue between Orange Park Boulevard and the Ridgeline Golf Course (addressed
10706 Meads
Avenue). (ZIS00.0 No. 1148-92)NOTE: This project is categorically exempt
from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
per State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15319.The Manager of Current Planning indicated
this property has been reviewed by LAFCO for annexation to the City. In this
case, the annexation procedures have been faster than the zoning procedures, and the property is
currently in the City. They are asking for a City Zone designation to be equivalent to
that which is out there and consistent
with the
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21,1992
13. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
The Applicant, Keith Naylor, 10706 Meads, addressed the Council in favor of approval
of the Pre-Zone
Change.MAYOR BEYER OPENED THE PUBLIC
HEARING.Bob Bennyhoff, 10642 Morada Drive, spoke in favor of
approval.THERE BEING NO FURTHER SPEAKERS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS
CLOSED.
MOTION
SECOND
AYES Spurgeon
Coontz
Steiner, Barrera, Mayor Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon CEQA
Finding: This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.MOTION
SECOND
AYES
Spurgeon
Coontz Steiner,
Barrera, Mayor
Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon Moved to approve Pre-
Zone Change 1148-92 as outlined in Planning Commission Resolution No.
PC-7-92.
14. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT - None 15.
ORAL PRESENTATIONS - None 16. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION - Steiner
SECOND - Coontz AYES -
Steiner, Barrera, Mayor
Beyer, Coontz, Spurgeon The City Council adjourned in
memory of Dr. Richard De Niro, D.D.s., a valuable member ofour community. The
Council sends condolences to his wife, Barbara, and the family.PAGElS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 21, 1992
16. ADJOURNMENT (Continued)
The City Council adjourned to an Adjourned Regular Meeting, Apri122, 1992 at 4:30
P.M. in the Council Chambers, with the Orange Public Library Board of Trustees to
discuss Library issues.
Marilyn J. J en, .
City Clerk
PAGE 16