HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-08-2001 - Minutes TC >.
i
CITY OF ORANGE � � :� � �
CITY TRAFFIC COMMIS�SION
DRAFT Minutes of a Regular Meeting: Auqust 8, 2001
1. OPENING
�1. Ftag Pledge
B. Roll Cail:
Present—Commissioners: D. Yarger, J. Fortier, F.Petronella, F. Sciarra
Present—Staff: R. Hohnbaum, C. Glass, Sgt. J. Gomez-Whiteley, P: Then
Absent —Commissioners: W. Poutsma . �
Absent —Staff: W. Winthers, D.Allenbach
C. Approval of Minutes: .
June '13, 2001 —Approve as publish�d by the Recording Secretary.
MOTIONe J. Fortier
SECOND: F. Petronella
AYES: Unanimous .
I!. CONSENT CALENDAR �
Ao Request for the installation of a vision zone at the intersection of Chapman Ave. and
Grant PI.
Scott Mitten
18331 Rainier Dr.
Santa Ana CA �
Oral presentation is based on the written staff report;p/ease refer to your copy. There
was no discussion of this request.
ACTION: Approve the installation of a vision zone at the intersection of
Chapman Ave. and Grant PI.
MOTION: D.Yarger
SECOND: F. Sciarra
AYES: Unanimous
Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Cominission meeting is available for yaur review.
� Please contact the Recording Secretary at(714)744-5536 in this regard,advance notice is appreciated.
�Printed on Recvcled Paver �
DRAFT M'inu et s of a Reguta, ��ieeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,2L..� pg,2
�. Request for the instailation of "NO PARKING ANYTIME" restrictions on the east side of
Lewis St. between Chapman Ave. and Compton Ave.
George Parker
2214 Vern St.
Anaheim CA 92802
Oral presentation is based on the written staff repo►t; please -refer to your copy.
Chairman Yarger opened the public hearing for the following discussion:
Geor�e Parker— 2314 Vern St., Anaheim — In favor of request. I walk every day down
Lewis St. and Chapman Ave. and on the east side of Lewis St. between Compt�n Ave.
` and Chapman Ave. there is on-street parking, however, there are no sidewalks so
� pedestrians have to walk on the grass and when its wet they have to go out in the street.
Since last November I have informed both the cities of Anaheim and Orange and they
have painted the curbs red except for the area between Compton and Chapman on the
east side of Lewis. When the pedestrians walk out in the street around the parked cars
they have to be in the face of oncoming traffic. There is ample parking on Compton
Ave. adjacent to the apartment complex.
Chairman YarQer � Do you know how many pedestrians walk through this area every
day?
Georqe Parker—I have no idea.
John Svmes, 129 N. Lewis St. #2 —�Opposed to the request. The parking situation for
the tenants of 129 & 141 N. Lewis St. don't have too many other options except to park
on the street, partly due to the fact that the alley behind these properties have a lot of
problems associated with it such as water running into it from the finro restaurants
adjacent to it, there is grease that eats the asphalt, and there is a huge pothole that frlls
with water and when cars go through it sprays this greasy water onto the garage walls.
When you're able to use your garage the doors are in disrepair, the average tenant wiil
not park in the back due to these problems. If repairs were made back here the tenants
would use it for parking instead of the street.
Lorraine Cvphers. 141 N. Lewis St. #4 — I oppose this request. Between our two
complexes there are 12 units and the average renter owns 2 vehicles and each
apartment is ailocated 1 covered parking space, and everyone else has to rely on street
parking. If I have to park a great distance away from our complex and then walk out in
the street it would be dangerous for me, especially at night. Right now I can park on the
street directly in front of my apartment if I'm forced to park 3-4 blocks away I would be
concerned with car theft and vandalism and I wouldn't be able to see if anyone was in
the area or not.
Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is avat�able for your review.
� � Please contact the Reco:dix�g Sea�etary at(714)7445536 in this regard,advance nodce is appreaated.
�Printed on Recvcled Paper
DRAFT Minutes of a Regul�. ,,leeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,�_ _i p9.3
James Zivich. 2600 E. Nutwood, Fuilerton (owner of 129 N Lewis St� — I am also the
manager of this property and I have been authorized to speak on behalf of the owners of
141 N. Lewis St. Opposed to request. The front lawn has a worn path created by �
pedestrian usage over the years, there is also a public alley behind the finro complex
where one could walk. The property was built in 1959 and there has been on-street
parking all that time, however, residents now have more vehicles and I don't know where
they can park if not on the street. People from the adjacent businesses also park here. I
worry abaut my tenants safety having to park 2-3 blocks away from the complex and
walking back to the apartment. Limiting tenants access to the property will decrease the
value of the property. I suggest permit parking on Lewis St. in front of the apartments or
extend the sidewafk adjacent to Kaiser and give pedestrians a place to walk.
Chairman Yarger closed the public hearing and retumed the item to the Commissioners
for final discussion and a motion.
Vice Chairman Fortier— I think there is a legitimate reason for the tenants to park here,
there are security reasons, lack of parking spots and I think they have a valid point.
Commissioner Sciarra — I agree. Orange is congested with no parking areas and we
need places for people to park. .
Commissioner Petronella—I concur.
ACTtON: Deny the installation of"NO PARKING ANYTIME" restr�ctions on the east
side of Lewis St. befinreen Chapman Ave. and Compton Ave.
MOTION: J. Fortier
SECOND: F. Petrone)la
AYES: Unanimous
' ����������������� End of Consent Calendar �����������������
�+�, Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is aw.ulable for pour review,
� PIease contact the Recoiding Secrepry at(71�7445536 in this regard,advance notice is appreciated
�Printed on Recvded Paner �
DRAFT Minutes of a Regula. _,�eeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,2�_� pg.4
III.CONSIDERATION ITEMS
1. Request for a "drop-of' zone with a "RELEASED TIME TRAILER EXEMPT" sign to be
instalied on the east side of Nohl Canyon Rd. adjacent to Nohi Canyon Efementary
School.
Valerie Via
PO Box 2935
Orange CA 92859-0935
Oral presentation is based on the wriiten staff report; please refer to your copy.
Chairman Yarger opened the public hearing for the following discussion.
Vice-Chairman Fortier—The homes on fhe west side of the street, do those homes front
the street?
RoQer Hohnbaum, Asst. Citv Enqineer—Yes, they take direct access from the street and
face the schooL
Valeria Via. PO Box 2935 — In favor of request. Beyond this location if there are cars
there and we are forced to park further down the street there is a dirt incline with bushes
and we cannot easily and safely access the side doors to enter and exit. When it's wet
and muddy that becomes a problem. Its not good to have the children walk in the street
to the chapel because there is no sidewalk. �
Dr. P. Nver. 2872 Nohl Canvon Rd. — I am opposed to this request. My home is directly
across from the location where this trailer parks. When school is in session during the
morning drop-off (7:30-8:15 am) and afternoon pick-up (2:15-3:00 pm) times the traffic
becomes unbearable, this becomes a 1 lane road. I have had problems on numerous
occasions accessing my home because the street is blocked. Having this trailer parked
here is a hazard, because the trailer �s wider than a regular car it creates as safety
concern. I have noticed children jump from behind the trailer into the path of oncoming
traffic when their parents come to pick them up. I propose that the trailer be parked only
during the daytime and be removed before dark. Could the hours be restricted allowing
the trailer to park on the street so it does not cause too many problems for the area
residents?
Vice-Chairman Fortier—How does this trailer restrict access to your residence?
Dr. Nver— During the moming and afternoon drop-off and pick-up for the school there is
a line of cars %2 mile in each direction of parents, the street is too narrow for everyone all
at the same time, and having the trailer here makes things worse.
. Candv Kennev, 15571 Alliance Ave. #10, Tustin—Supports the request. The trailer has
� parked here for a number of years and the time these traffic problems occur are finro 45
minute periods one day a week. The chapel is usually picked up in the afternoon and
moved to another school. �
.,,,. Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meering is available for your review.
_ � Please contact the Recording Secretary at(714)744-5536 in this regard,advaace notice is appreciated.
�Printed on Recvcled Paver
DRAFT Minutes of a Regula� .�leeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,2�.,i Pg.5
- Chairman Yarger closed tfie public hearing and retumed the item to the Commission for
�nal discussion and a motion.
Cornmissioner Sciarra — The trailer has been here for quite some time and there have
been no incidents or accidents in that area. It appears t�at peopie who dri�� here
experience congestion but they are very careful.
Vice-Chairman Fortier — I will call the Principat of the school and make sure they get
some supervision out there so children are not jumping out from behind the trailer into
the travel fanes.
A. ACTION: Deny the installation of a�drop-ofP'zone on Nohl Canyon Rd.
. MOTION: F. Petronella
SECOND: D. Yarger .
AYES: Unanimous .
B. ACTION: Approve the installation of an additional 30 ft. of red curb markings �
and a �RELEASED TIME TRAlLER EXEMPT" sign be installed south of the
school driveway on Nohl Ganyon Rd.
MOTION: F. Petronella �
SECOND: F. Sciarra
� AYES: Unanimous
2. Request for the implementation of nighttime parking restrictions on both sides of
Briardale Ave. between Lincoln St. and Tustin St., and portions of Shattuck St. north of
Briardale Ave.
William Chavez �
1603 Eo Briardale Ave.
Orange CA 92865
Oral presentation is based on the w�tten staff report; p/ease refer to your copy. There
was no discussion of this item.
ACTION: Deny this request until you circulate a petition through the neighborhood.
I think its only fair to have all the people �in the neighborhood that would
be affected by this have the opportunity to indicate if they are in favor of
the request or are opposed to it.
MOTION: D. Yarger
SECOND: F. Sciarra
AYES: Unanimous
Vice-Chairman Fortier—Are we talking about the residents listed here on the Agenda or
th�ones affected by the restriction? �
Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Corrunission meeting is ava�7able for your r�.wiew
� - Please contact the Recording Secretary at(714)744-5536 in this regazd,advance notice is appreciated.
�P=inted on Recvcled Paver
DRAFT Minutes of a Regular.Meeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,2Uu1 p9,g
RoQer Hohnbaum. Asst. Citv En_ ineer— i would suggest that the petition needs to come .
from those people on Briardale that are using this parking it would directty affect their
residences.
Vice-Chairman Fortier — So the residents on Glenda{e if they signed the petition their
signature wouldn't count, is that correct?
RoQer Hohnbaum, Asst. Citv EnQineer—That is correct.
Vice-Chairman F�rtier — I just want to make it straight for everybody so we are only
talking about the people who live�on Briardale Ave. and if we get a petition that the,.
majority of those people were against this then we probably have� a good case of
denying it.
3. Request for the installation of an "All Way" STOP control device at the intersection
of Ches#nut Ave. and Maplewood St. �
Craig Balthrop
1243 E. Chestnut Ave.
Orange CA 92867
Oral presentation is based on the written staff report; please refer to your copy.
Chairman Yarger opened the public hearing for the following discussion:
Craiq Balthrop, 1243 E. Chestnut Ave. — In favor of the request. We have a lot of
children from 3-12 years old. Because this segment of Chestnut is a very long street
and allows on-street parking motorists have difficulty seeing children and bicyclists as
they drive down Chestnut and turn onto Maplewood. We're concerned about their
safety. The exact same condition exists over on Shaffer and Chestnut and a STOP sign
was just installed a few weeks ago. We have traffic trying to bypass Tustin St. and Taft
Ave. using our street as a short-cut to avoid the construction zones and the traffic on the
major streets.
Lerov Andersen. 1126 E. Chestnut Ave. — I've lived here 40 years and I've never seen a
traffic accident or child run over and 75% of the cars will turn onto Maplewood but they
live either on Concord and Candlewood, and they slow down. They don't speed and
there is hardly ever any cars parked there. I think both requests should be denied, it's a
waste and we don't need it. I raised my kids and had no problem and all you have to do
is teach your children to obey traffic laws and stop at intersections and not to go darting
into the street.
Wavne Millard. 1138 E. Chestnut Ave. — My home is directly across from the
intersection. That is a pretty clear intersection, westbound traffic making a turn onto
Maplewood have a pretty clear view of the intersection. The traffic flows pretty decently,
I understand that some of the residents have young children. I don't think we need
STOP signs at this intersection, all you have to do is slow down before your make your
turno We don't have a problem. �
•�,. Tape#C I'C-21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is ava�able for your review.
` Please contact the Recording Secretary at(714)7445536 in this regard,advance notice is appreciated.
. �Printed on Recvcled Paver
.�
DRAFT Minutes of a Regular�vleeting—City Tra�c Commission August 8,2�v1 Pg.7
Larry Honiket, 1600 N. Maplewood St. —I've lived at this intersection 35 years and raised
4 kids on that corner, my neighbors raised 7 kids and we had footbail and baseball
games out in the street. There is no traffic problem at this tocation. The only accident
was someone hitting a parked car. All four houses at this intersection park their cars in
their driveways and visibility at this location is very good,we don't need a STOP sign. -
Chairman Yarger closed the public hearing and retumed the item to the Commission for
further discussion and a motion.
ACTION:
Ao Deny the installation of an "All Way" STOP control device at the intersection of
Chestnut Ave. and Maplewood St. �
MOTION: D. Yarger
SECOND: F. Sciarra
AYES: Unanimous
B. Deny the installation of a "1 Way" STOP control device on Maplewood S#. at
Chestnut Ave.
MOTION: F. Petronella
SECOND: J. Fortier
AYES: Unanimous
4. Request for the instatlation of an "All-Way" ST�P controt device at the intersection
of Orange St. and Almond Ave.
Gary Mead, Sr.
128 S. Orange St.
Orange CA 92866
� Oral presentation is based on the written staff report; please refer to your copy.
Chairman Yarger opened the public hearing for the following discussion.
Gary Mead. 182 S. Oranqe St• —The city did install a 4-Way STOP as a side benefit of
the Plaza work so we experienced cars stopping at the corner and we liked it. If you're
9 coming up Glassell there is a blue sign indicating public parking and it directs traffic off
Glassell onto Almond and then on to Orange St. The normal traffic traveling at a very
� rapid pace goes east and west on Almond so the people on Orange St. don't have an
opportunity to pass through that intersection safely. The letter I received indicated that �
approximately 30 ft. of red curb would have to be installed on both sides of the street, I
like that. It provides our guests and people using� the municipal parking !ot better
visibility of oncoming traffic. The difficulty at this street has been attributed to the fact
that there is a STOP sign and below it there is a plate indicating that "CROSS TRAFFIC
DOES NOT STOP" so there have been several accidents at this location. We have a lot of
customers who park on the street in the neighborhood and try to walk back and forth. In
summary, because the city did install a STOP sign and it was such a good idea I would
like you to consider installing a "4-Way"STOP here permanently.
•s,,. Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is awu7able for your review.
` ::
Please contact the Recording Secretary at(714)7445536 in this regard,advance notice is appreciated. �
�Printed on Recvcled Pat�er
� �
DRAFT Minutes of a Regula� �vleeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,2�.,1 pg,g
DeAnne_Wi{liams. 506 E. Aimond Ave. — I am in favor of this request. There is a lot of
traffic on Almond Ave. and I befieve we need more STOP signs. The closer you get to
Ofd Towne and the Plaza the more congestion you have.
Chairman Yarger closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for
further discussion and a motion.
Commissioner Petronella—It doesn't meet the warrants and I don't see the need.
Vice-Chairman Fortier— I agree and STOP signs aren't instailed to controi speed. One
of our charges is to expedite traffic through the City as best and safely as we can and if
we put a STOP sign on every corner we wouldn't get across the city easilyo
ACTION: Deny the , installation of an "All-Way" STOP contro{ device at the
intersection of Orange St. and Afmond Ave.
MOTION: F. Sciarra
� SECOND: J. Fortier
AYES: Unanimous
5. Request for the installation of additional red curb markings on the east side of
Shaffer St. on both sides of Moreland Dr.
Fred Herrlein
604 E. Moreland Dr.
Orange CA 92866
Oral presentation is based on the w►rtten stafi report; p/ease refer to your copy. There
was no discussion of this request.
ACTIONo Deny the installation of additional red curb markings on the east side
of Shaffer St. on both sides of Moreland Dr.
MOTION: D. Yarger _
SECOND: F. Petronella
AYES: Unanimous � �
•,,.. Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meering is ava�able for your review. '
s Please contact the Recording Secietary at(714)744-5536 in this regard,advance notice is appreciated.
�Printed on Recvcled Pauer
DRAFT Minutes of a Regula� .��eeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,2�,.,� pg,g
6. Request for the implementation of "NO PARtc�NG 7:30 AM — 8:30 AM AND 2:30 PM —
3:30 PM SCHOOLDAYS" on the St. John's Lutheran Church frontages on both sides of
Shaffer St. befinreen Almond Ave. and Chapman Ave. and the east side of Center St.
north of Almond Ave.
Y St. John's Lutheran Church
154 S. Shaffer St. ��
Orange CA 92866-1609
Oral presentation is based on the written stafi report; please refer to your copy.
. Chairman Yarger recused himself from voting on this item and Vice-Chairman Fortier
opened the public hearing for the following discussion:
DeAnne Williams. 506 E. Almond Ave. —�I live in house on the corner diagonally across
from St. John's. I am opposed to this request. This proposed restriction will move traffic
into the adjacent neighborhood and it will be a problem trying to access my residence.
St. John's holds events at both the Church and School all year long and it impacts the
neighborhood. Parents park on the street and escort their children to their classrooms,
they block the driveways and even park in my driveway.
RoQer Hohnbaum, Asst. City EnQineer— The purpose of marking out these curbs is part
of a larger plan. They would like to have on-campus representatives directing a drop-off
program, instead of having parents drive to the school and park wherever and then walk
their children in and then coming back out. They want to create these zones where �
parents will pull up, unload their children and they will be forced to move on by these
attendants. Additiona{ly, the school is varying the starting time of some of their classes
so everyone doesn't arrive a!I at the same time. The expansion of the school has been a
wonderFul catalyst for the city to work with the school and try to improve the drop-
off/pick-up activities. These zones are marked out for no parking so they can be used
for this purpose. Except for these 2 hours a day people can park there. The City has
. not approved this program yet, there is still quite a bit that has to be submitted by the
school before that happens. This will not be striped out restricting parking unless the
complete plan is approved.
Teri GeorQe. 2752 N. Roxbury St. — I oppose the request. I attend the church and also
attended the school while t was growing up. Part of the dynamic of the school is that we
interact with other parents and the teachers on the campus, we are very involved, we
hold meetings of the parents right after morning drop-off at 8:15. We demand that
parents volunteer with their kids' classes, and we have a lot of after school activity
programs, sports, field trips, class parties, etc. The parking now used by faculty is part
of the construction and until the new parking structure is completed there won't be much
on-site parking.
� Brian Rauso. 543 E. Almond Ave. — I live right next to the school. I am opposed to the
request. Eliminating 35-40 parking stalls in the moming and afternoons is going to force
parents to park in the residential areas. School won't start and this program won't be
implemented until later this year and we don't really know how its going to work out,
what is our recourse if we feel it doesn't work and want to come back to you and say the
decision we made August 8th, wasn't a good one can we go back and do something
about it; based on the 15 calendar day�appeal period stated in the notification letter.
Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is available for your review.
� � Please contact the Recoiding Secretary at(714)7445536 in this regard,advance notice is appreaated.
�Printed on Recvcled Paver
DRAFT Minutes of a Reguiai �,�eeting—City Traffic Commission August 8,2�„� pg. �p
Roger Hohnbaum - The city is concerned about the existing conditions and the
adequacy of the parking plan. The action being taken today is merefy to say that we
approve drop-off zones if they are included as part of the parking plan. If the parking
plan presented to the city is proven not to work, if it doesn't work then these drop-off
zones are not needed or if the hours of the drop-off zones are found to be ineffective
then this will not be implemented. We need to be really clear about what is
happening here this afternoon and this is that the CTC has the charge of
approving changes to signing, striping, etc. and they are saying the drop-off
zone is approvable and they're doing it on the contingency that the plan is
approved. 1 think the plan will have to address the problem with the hours, in fact
you could very clearly state that if the hours and/or locations are modified as part
of the plan then we may wish it to be reviewed once again by the CTC.
Darel Hebenstert, Architects-4ranqe, 144 N. �range St. —Austin-Foust & Assoc.
and Architects Orange are the parties involved in developing the parking and
mitigation plan that we're talking about. I'd like to clear up and verify that a draft
of the entire plan has been previously provided to the City and is being reviewed
at this time. We are far enough into this plan to pretty well understand the size of
the drop-off zones that we need, their locations on the campus. The solu#ion to
some of the parking and arrival and departure problems at the school is two-fold,
one is the development of a carpooling program that is underway at this time and
is to be enacted next summer for the beginning of school next year when the
expansion of the campus will be complete.
The drop-off zones have been set up and designed based upon observed turn-
over rates from videotaping the existing drop-off zones on the campus. We have
used conservative turn over rates of 2-3 times what the rates were. We've
calculated the number of students that go into each area of the campus and the
drop-off zones are specifically designed and located to support the grade
groupings that occur within the campus. Pre-school, kindergarten and 1 St grade
use the zone on Center St.; we have a zone on the west side of Shaffer St. which
supports the 6-8th grade middle school; and there is a zone on the east side of
� Shaffer St. that supports the 2-5�' grade zone. Af! of these zones are designed
so students or parents do not have to cross either Center St. or Shaffer St. to get
to their final classroom designation, we are trying to be conscious of minimizing
the number of crossings that occur. Some families have more than one student
within different grades, so there will be some crossing in that situation.
One clarification is that we are leaving some parking on Shaffer St. and that is
the area in front of Walker Hall (south of a small service curb-cut in the road)this .
- allows 4 stalls to remain on Shaffer St. The current drop-off program removes 27
cars from on-street parking. The expansion plans for the campus are creating an
additional 36 spaces on-site. We are more than compensating for the loss of
those cars during the limited hours by having cars on-site. Our totai site parking
will go from 47 to 83. We have negotiated an arrangement with Covenant
Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is awailable for your review.
Please contact the Reco�g Secretary at(714)7445536 in this regard,advance notice is appreciated.
�rinted on Recvcled Paver
DRAF'f Minutes of a Regula. _�oeeting-City Traffic Commission August 8,2�._ , pg,��
Community Church, 2 blocks down on Maple Ave. and we are going to be using .
_ 60 stalis in their parking tot which is completely empty during weekdays for staff
parking. A shuttfe van has already been donated to the school and a system has
been set up for shuttiing church and school staff back and forth to that parking lot
� during construction. We will lose about 40 cars during our construction period,
we're aware of that. We are going to be permanently changing the stagger of the
church services on Sunday to allow greater time periods befinreen church
services so the area can clear before the nexf group arrives, this change will be
implemented the beginning of September.
During the constru�tion period we are also putting a temporary Sunday parking
lot on sorne of the basketball courts and other hardscape areas inside the
campus which provides about 25 cars for one of the church services. I believe
we have a well thought out plan that takes into consideration pedestrian and,
, auto activity. It's going to be a well managed program with escorts for the small
children from the drop-off zone to their classrooms. We are not proposing any
drop-off zones on Almond, leaving the parking closest to the neighborhoods as
is, trying not to encourage additional traffic along those streets. The hours of
control can be debated some and perhaps we could narrow that somewhat.
Vice-Chalrman Fortier closed the public hearing and returned the item to the
Commission for further discussion and a motione
Commissioner Fortier— I can see that this is basically�contingent upon the overall
plan and that this won't go into effect unless the overall plan is approved.
ACTION: Approve the implementation of "NO PARKING 7:30 AM — 8:30 �
AND 2:30 PM — 3:30 PM SCHOOLDAYS" on the St. John's Lutheran
Church frontages on both sides of Shaffer St. between Almond
Ave. and Chapman Ave. and the east side of Center St. north of
Almond Avee �
� MOTION: F. Sciarra
� SECOND: F. Petronefla .
AYES: J. Fortier, F. Sciarra, F. Petronella -
ABSTAIN: D. Yarger �
Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is awu�able for your re�riew .
� °' Please contact the Recording Secretary at(?14)744-5536.in this regard,advance notice is appreciated.
�Printed on Recvcled Paver
DRAFT Minutes of a Regula� .�reeting—City Traffic Commission�ugust 8,2�,,� pg. 12
IV.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
None this month.
V. OR�►L PRESENTATIONS
None this month.
VI.ADJOURNMEIVT
After discussion of today's Agenda items of the City Traffic Commission was concluded, and
as there were no further requests for action under Oral Presentations, the Chairman
adjourned this session of the City Traffic Commission at 5:25 p.m.
The next regular meeting of the City Traffic Commission will be held Wednesday —
September 12, 200'I.
Respectfully submitted,
CITY OF ORANGE
Phyllis Then
Recording Secretary
Traffic Engineering Division .
CITY OF ORANGE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
300 E.CHAPMAN AVE.
OR�►NGE CA 92866
PH: (714)744-5536
FAx: (714)744-5573
�August Minutes[CTC Disk/ThenpJ �
Tape#CTG21.07 of this City Traffic Commission meeting is available for your review.
� - Please contact the Recording Secretary at(714)744-5536 in this regard,advance notice is appreciated.
�Printed on Recvcled Paner