HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttachment 12 Greenhouse Gas Analysis
Orange Corporate Yard
Affordable Housing
GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS
CITY OF ORANGE
PREPARED BY:
Haseeb Qureshi
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
(949) 336-5987
Alyssa Tamase
atamase@urbanxroads.com
(949) 336-5988
MARCH 26, 2020
13209-02 GHG Report
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2
APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................... 3
LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................................. 3
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... 3
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS .............................................................................................................. 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1
ES.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 1
ES.2 Standard Regulatory Requirements .............................................................................................. 1
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 4
1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 4
1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 4
2 CLIMATE CHANGE SETTING ......................................................................................................... 8
2.1 Introduction to Global Climate Change (GCC) .............................................................................. 8
2.2 Global Climate Change Defined .................................................................................................... 8
2.3 GHGs ............................................................................................................................................. 8
2.4 Global Warming Potential ........................................................................................................... 15
2.5 GHG Emissions Inventories ......................................................................................................... 15
2.6 Effects of Climate Change in California ....................................................................................... 16
2.7 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................................................... 18
2.8 Discussion on Establishment of Significance Thresholds ............................................................ 38
3 PROJECT GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT ......................................................................................... 41
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 41
3.2 Standards of Significance ............................................................................................................ 41
3.3 California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Employed To Analyze GHGs ....................... 41
3.4 Life-Cycle Analysis Not Required ................................................................................................ 42
3.5 Construction Emissions ............................................................................................................... 42
3.6 Operational Emissions ................................................................................................................ 44
3.7 Emissions Summary .................................................................................................................... 46
3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Findings and Recommendations ..................................................... 46
4 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 54
5 CERTIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 59
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
iii
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 3.1: CALEEMOD EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................... 5
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 6
EXHIBIT 2-A: SUMMARY OF PROJECTED GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT, 2070-2099 (AS COMPARED WITH
1961-1990) ......................................................................................................................................... 14
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................. 1
TABLE 2-1: GHGS .................................................................................................................................. 9
TABLE 2-2: GWP AND ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME OF SELECT GHGS ........................................................ 15
TABLE 2-3: TOP GHG PRODUCING COUNTRIES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ...................................... 16
TABLE 3-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION .............................................................................................. 43
TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................... 43
TABLE 3-3: AMORTIZED ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ........................................................... 44
TABLE 3-4: PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS ................................................................................................. 46
TABLE 3-5: 2017 SCOPING PLAN CONSISTENCY SUMMARY ................................................................. 47
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
iv
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
(1) Reference
°C Degrees Celsius
°F Degrees Fahrenheit
2017 Scoping Plan Final 2017 Scoping Plan Update
AB Assembly Bill
AB 32 Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
AB 1493 Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards
AB 1881 California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006
ACE Affordable Clean Energy Rule
Annex I Industrialized Nations
APA Administrative Procedure Act
AQIA Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Air Quality
Impact Analysis
BACT Best Available Control Technology
BAU Business As Usual
CF4 Tetrafluoromethane
C2F6 Hexafluoroethane
C2H6 Ethane
C2H2F4 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluroethane
C2H4F2 Ethylidene Fluoride
CH3CF2 1,1-Difluoroethane
CAA Federal Clean Air Act
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CALFIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
CALGAPS California LBNL GHG Analysis of Policies Spreadsheet
CALGreen CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards
Code
CalRecycle California Recycling Market Development Act
CalSTA California State Transportation Agency
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
CARB California Air Resource Board
CBSC California Building Standards Commission
CDFA California Department of Food and Agriculture
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
v
CEC California Energy Commission
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA Guidelines 2019 CEQA Statute and Guidelines
CF4 Tetrafluoromethane
CFC Chlorofluorocarbons
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CH4 Methane
CHF3 Carbon Trifluoride/Fluoroform
CHF3 Carbon Trifluoride
City City of Orange
CNRA 2009 2009 California Climate Adaption Strategy
CO Carbon Monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
Convention U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change
COP Conference of the Parties
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
CTC California Transportation Commission
DOF Department of Finance
DWR Department of Water Resources
EMFAC EMissions FACtor Model
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EV Electric Vehicles
FSOR Final Statement of Reasons
GC General Commercial
GCC Global Climate Change
Gg Gigagram
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GHGA Greenhouse Gas Analysis
GO-Biz Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development
GWP Global Warming Potential
H2O Water
HDT Heavy-Duty Trucks
HFC Hydrofluorocarbons
IBank Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
ISO Independent System Operator
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
vi
lbs Pounds
LBNL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
LCA Life-Cycle Analysis
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
LEV-III Low-Emission Vehicle Program
MD Medium-Duty Passenger Cars
MDR Medium Density Residential
MFR Multiple-Family Residential
MMR Mandatory Reporting Rule
MMTCO2e Million Metric Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
mpg Miles Per Gallon
MT/yr Metric Tons Per Year
MTCO2e Metric Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
MTCO2e/yr Metric Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Per Year
MW Megawatts
MWELO Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
MWh Megawatt Per Hour
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
N20 Nitrogen Dioxide/Nitrous Oxide
NDC Nationally Determined Contributions
NF3 Nitrogen Trifluoride
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NOX Nitrogen Oxides
Non-Annex I Developing Nations
OAL Office of Administrative Law
PFC Perfluorocarbons
ppb Parts Per Billion
ppm Parts Per Million
ppt Parts Per Trillion
Project Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing
RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard
SAR Second Assessment Report
SB Senate Bill
SB 32 California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
SB 350 Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015
SB 375 Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Action of
2008
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
vii
SB 1078 Renewable Portfolio Standards
SB 1368 Statewide Retail Provider Emissions Performance Standards
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCE Southern California Edison
SF6 Sulfur Hexaflouride
SGC Strategic Growth Council
SLPS Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy
SWRCB State Water Resource Control Board
Title 20 CCR Title 20: Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards
Title 24 CCR Title 24 Part 6: California’s Energy Efficiency Standards
for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings
U.N. United Nations
U.S. United States
U.S. Court U.S. Supreme Court
UNFCCC United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change
VFP Vehicle Fueling Position
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
WRI World Resources Institute
ZE/NZE Zero and Near-Zero Emissions
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
viii
This page intentionally left blank
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis (GHGA)
is summarized below based on the significance criteria in Section 3 of this report consistent with
Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (1). Table ES-1 shows
that the Project would result in less than significant greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts under CEQA.
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
GHG Impact #1: Would the Project generate
direct or indirect GHG emission that would
result in a significant impact on the
environment?
3.8 Less Than Significant n/a
GHG Impact #2: Would the Project conflict
with any applicable plan, policy or regulation
of an agency adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of GHGs?
3.8 Less Than Significant n/a
ES.2 STANDARD REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
The Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the State of California and
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) aimed at the reduction of air
pollutant emissions. Those that are directly and indirectly applicable to the Project and that
would assist in the reduction of GHG emissions include:
• Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill (AB) 32) (2).
• Regional GHG Emissions Reduction Targets/Sustainable Communities Strategies (Senate Bill (SB)
375) (3).
• Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards (AB 1493). Establishes fuel efficiency ratings for new vehicles (4).
• California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of California Code of Regulations
(CCR)). Establishes energy efficiency requirements for new construction (5).
• Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20 CCR). Establishes energy efficiency requirements
for appliances (6).
• Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). Requires carbon content of fuel sold in California to be 10
percent (%) less by 2020 (7).
• California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881). Requires local agencies to
adopt the Department of Water Resources updated Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or
equivalent by January 1, 2010 to ensure efficient landscapes in new development and reduced
water waste in existing landscapes (8).
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
2
• Statewide Retail Provider Emissions Performance Standards (SB 1368). Requires energy
generators to achieve performance standards for GHG emissions (9).
• Renewable Portfolio Standards (SB 1078 – also referred to as RPS). Requires electric corporations
to increase the amount of energy obtained from eligible renewable energy resources to 20 % by
2010 and 33% by 2020 (10).
• California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (SB 32). Requires the state to reduce statewide
GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, a reduction target that was first introduced in
Executive Order B-30-15 (11).
Promulgated regulations that will affect the Project’s emissions are accounted for in the Project’s
GHG calculations provided in this report. In particular, AB 1493, LCFS, and RPS, and therefore are
accounted for in the Project’s emission calculations.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
3
This page intentionally left blank
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
4
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the GHGA prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for the
proposed Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing (Project). The purpose of this GHGA is to
evaluate Project-related construction and operational emissions and determine the level of GHG
impacts as a result of constructing and operating the proposed Project.
1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing site is located north of Struck Avenue
and east of Batavia Street in the City of Orange, as shown on Exhibit 1-A. The Project site is located
adjacent to the Metrolink Inland Empire-Orange County Line. Existing uses that surround the
Project site include commercial retail centers to the north, the Department of Public Works to
the west, and a nursey to the south. The City of Orange General Plan designates the Project site
for General Commercial (GC) uses. The GC designation allows for a wide range of retail and
service commercial uses and professional offices. Regional shopping centers, mid-rise office
projects, corridor shopping districts, and neighborhood corner stores are permitted uses (12).
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project is anticipated to include the development of up to 62 multi-family
affordable housing residential dwelling units (DU) as shown on Exhibit 1-B. As the land uses
proposed by the Project are not consistent with the General Plan land use designation, the
Project would require a Development Code Amendment from GC to Medium Density Residential
(MDR) (i.e., Zone Change).
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
5
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
6
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
7
This page intentionally left blank
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
8
2 CLIMATE CHANGE SETTING
2.1 INTRODUCTION TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE (GCC)
GCC is defined as the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to
temperature, precipitation, and storms. The majority of scientists believe that the climate shift
taking place since the Industrial Revolution is occurring at a quicker rate and magnitude than in
the past. Scientific evidence suggests that GCC is the result of increased concentrations of GHGs
in the earth’s atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O),
and fluorinated gases. The majority of scientists believe that this increased rate of climate change
is the result of GHGs resulting from human activity and industrialization over the past 200 years.
An individual project like the proposed Project evaluated in this GHGA cannot generate enough
GHG emissions to affect a discernible change in global climate. However, the proposed Project
may participate in the potential for GCC by its incremental contribution of GHGs combined with
the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs, which when taken together constitute
potential influences on GCC. Because these changes may have serious environmental
consequences, Section 3.0 will evaluate the potential for the proposed Project to have a
significant effect upon the environment as a result of its potential contribution to the greenhouse
effect.
2.2 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE DEFINED
GCC refers to the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to
temperature, wind patterns, precipitation and storms. Global temperatures are regulated by
naturally occurring atmospheric gases such as water vapor, CO2, N2O, CH4, hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These particular gases are
important due to their residence time (duration they stay) in the atmosphere, which ranges from
10 years to more than 100 years. These gases allow solar radiation into the earth’s atmosphere,
but prevent radioactive heat from escaping, thus warming the earth’s atmosphere. GCC can occur
naturally as it has in the past with the previous ice ages.
Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often referred to as GHGs. GHGs are released into
the atmosphere by both natural and anthropogenic activity. Without the natural GHG effect, the
earth’s average temperature would be approximately 61 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) cooler than it is
currently. The cumulative accumulation of these gases in the earth’s atmosphere is considered
to be the cause for the observed increase in the earth’s temperature.
2.3 GHGS
2.3.1 GHGS AND HEALTH EFFECTS
GHGs trap heat in the atmosphere, creating a GHG effect that results in global warming and
climate change. Many gases demonstrate these properties and as discussed in Table 2-1. For the
purposes of this analysis, emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O were evaluated (see Table 3-1 later in
this report) because these gases are the primary contributors to GCC from development projects.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
9
Although there are other substances such as fluorinated gases that also contribute to GCC, these
fluorinated gases were not evaluated as their sources are not well-defined and do not contain
accepted emissions factors or methodology to accurately calculate these gases.
TABLE 2-1: GHGS
GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
Water Water is the most abundant,
important, and variable GHG in
the atmosphere. Water vapor is
not considered a pollutant; in
the atmosphere it maintains a
climate necessary for life.
Changes in its concentration are
primarily considered to be a
result of climate feedbacks
related to the warming of the
atmosphere rather than a direct
result of industrialization. A
climate feedback is an indirect,
or secondary, change, either
positive or negative, that occurs
within the climate system in
response to a forcing
mechanism. The feedback loop
in which water is involved is
critically important to projecting
future climate change.
As the temperature of the
atmosphere rises, more water is
evaporated from ground storage
(rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil).
Because the air is warmer, the
relative humidity can be higher
(in essence, the air is able to
‘hold’ more water when it is
warmer), leading to more water
vapor in the atmosphere. As a
GHG, the higher concentration of
water vapor is then able to
absorb more thermal indirect
energy radiated from the Earth,
thus further warming the
atmosphere. The warmer
atmosphere can then hold more
water vapor and so on and so
on. This is referred to as a
“positive feedback loop.” The
extent to which this positive
feedback loop will continue is
The main source of
water vapor is
evaporation from
the oceans
(approximately
85%). Other sources
include evaporation
from other water
bodies, sublimation
(change from solid to
gas) from sea ice and
snow, and
transpiration from
plant leaves.
There are no known direct
health effects related to
water vapor at this time. It
should be noted however
that when some pollutants
react with water vapor, the
reaction forms a transport
mechanism for some of
these pollutants to enter the
human body through water
vapor.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
10
GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
unknown as there are also
dynamics that hold the positive
feedback loop in check. As an
example, when water vapor
increases in the atmosphere,
more of it will eventually
condense into clouds, which are
more able to reflect incoming
solar radiation (thus allowing
less energy to reach the earth’s
surface and heat it up) (13).
CO2 CO2 is an odorless and colorless
GHG. Since the industrial
revolution began in the mid-
1700s, the sort of human activity
that increases GHG emissions
has increased dramatically in
scale and distribution. Data
from the past 50 years suggests
a corollary increase in levels and
concentrations. As an example,
prior to the industrial revolution,
CO2 concentrations were fairly
stable at 280 parts per million
(ppm). Today, they are around
370 ppm, an increase of more
than 30%. Left unchecked, the
concentration of CO2 in the
atmosphere is projected to
increase to a minimum of 540
ppm by 2100 as a direct result of
anthropogenic sources (14).
CO2 is emitted from
natural and
manmade sources.
Natural sources
include: the
decomposition of
dead organic matter;
respiration of
bacteria, plants,
animals and fungus;
evaporation from
oceans; and volcanic
outgassing.
Anthropogenic
sources include: the
burning of coal, oil,
natural gas, and
wood. CO2 is
naturally removed
from the air by
photosynthesis,
dissolution into
ocean water,
transfer to soils and
ice caps, and
chemical weathering
of carbonate rocks
(15).
Outdoor levels of CO2 are not
high enough to result in
negative health effects.
According to the National
Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH)
high concentrations of CO2
can result in health effects
such as: headaches,
dizziness, restlessness,
difficulty breathing,
sweating, increased heart
rate, increased cardiac
output, increased blood
pressure, coma, asphyxia,
and/or convulsions. It should
be noted that current
concentrations of CO2 in the
earth’s atmosphere are
estimated to be
approximately 370 ppm, the
actual reference exposure
level (level at which adverse
health effects typically
occur) is at exposure levels
of 5,000 ppm averaged over
10 hours in a 40-hour
workweek and short-term
reference exposure levels of
30,000 ppm averaged over a
15 minute period (16).
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
11
GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
CH4 CH4 is an extremely effective
absorber of radiation, although
its atmospheric concentration is
less than CO2 and its lifetime in
the atmosphere is brief (10-12
years), compared to other GHGs.
CH4 has both natural
and anthropogenic
sources. It is
released as part of
the biological
processes in low
oxygen
environments, such
as in swamplands or
in rice production (at
the roots of the
plants). Over the
last 50 years, human
activities such as
growing rice, raising
cattle, using natural
gas, and mining coal
have added to the
atmospheric
concentration of
CH4. Other
anthropocentric
sources include
fossil-fuel
combustion and
biomass burning
(17).
CH4 is extremely reactive
with oxidizers, halogens, and
other halogen-containing
compounds. Exposure to
high levels of CH4 can cause
asphyxiation, loss of
consciousness, headache
and dizziness, nausea and
vomiting, weakness, loss of
coordination, and an
increased breathing rate.
N2O N2O, also known as laughing gas,
is a colorless GHG.
Concentrations of N2O also
began to rise at the beginning of
the industrial revolution. In
1998, the global concentration
was 314 parts per billion (ppb).
N2O is produced by
microbial processes
in soil and water,
including those
reactions which
occur in fertilizer
containing nitrogen.
In addition to
agricultural sources,
some industrial
processes (fossil
fuel-fired power
plants, nylon
production, nitric
acid production, and
vehicle emissions)
also contribute to its
atmospheric load. It
is used as an aerosol
spray propellant, i.e.,
in whipped cream
bottles. It is also
N2O can cause dizziness,
euphoria, and sometimes
slight hallucinations. In
small doses, it is considered
harmless. However, in some
cases, heavy and extended
use can cause Olney’s
Lesions (brain damage) (18).
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
12
GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
used in potato chip
bags to keep chips
fresh. It is used in
rocket engines and
in race cars. N2O can
be transported into
the stratosphere, be
deposited on the
earth’s surface, and
be converted to
other compounds by
chemical reaction
(18).
Chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs)
CFCs are gases formed
synthetically by replacing all
hydrogen atoms in CH4 or ethane
(C2H6) with chlorine and/or
fluorine atoms. CFCs are
nontoxic, nonflammable,
insoluble and chemically
unreactive in the troposphere
(the level of air at the earth’s
surface).
CFCs have no natural
source but were first
synthesized in 1928.
They were used for
refrigerants, aerosol
propellants and
cleaning solvents.
Due to the discovery
that they are able to
destroy
stratospheric ozone,
a global effort to halt
their production was
undertaken and was
extremely
successful, so much
so that levels of the
major CFCs are now
remaining steady or
declining. However,
their long
atmospheric
lifetimes mean that
some of the CFCs will
remain in the
atmosphere for over
100 years (19).
In confined indoor locations,
working with CFC-113 or
other CFCs is thought to
result in death by cardiac
arrhythmia (heart frequency
too high or too low) or
asphyxiation.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
13
GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
HFCs HFCs are synthetic, man-made
chemicals that are used as a
substitute for CFCs. Out of all
the GHGs, they are one of three
groups with the highest global
warming potential (GWP). The
HFCs with the largest measured
atmospheric abundances are (in
order), fluoroform (CHF3),
1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane
(CH2FCF), and 1,1-difluoroethane
(CH3CF2). Prior to 1990, the only
significant emissions were of
CHF3. CH2FCF emissions are
increasing due to its use as a
refrigerant.
HFCs are manmade
for applications such
as automobile air
conditioners and
refrigerants.
No health effects are known
to result from exposure to
HFCs.
PFCs PFCs have stable molecular
structures and do not break
down through chemical
processes in the lower
atmosphere. High-energy
ultraviolet rays, which occur
about 60 kilometers above
earth’s surface, are able to
destroy the compounds.
Because of this, PFCs have very
long lifetimes, between 10,000
and 50,000 years. Two common
PFCs are tetrafluoromethane
(CF4) and hexafluoroethane
(C2F6). The EPA estimates that
concentrations of CF4 in the
atmosphere are over 70 parts
per trillion (ppt).
The two main
sources of PFCs are
primary aluminum
production and
semiconductor
manufacture.
No health effects are known
to result from exposure to
PFCs.
SF6 SF6 is an inorganic, odorless,
colorless, nontoxic,
nonflammable gas. It also has
the highest GWP of any gas
evaluated (23,900) (20). The EPA
indicates that concentrations in
the 1990s were about 4 ppt.
SF6 is used for
insulation in electric
power transmission
and distribution
equipment, in the
magnesium industry,
in semiconductor
manufacturing, and
as a tracer gas for
leak detection.
In high concentrations in
confined areas, the gas
presents the hazard of
suffocation because it
displaces the oxygen needed
for breathing.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
14
GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
Nitrogen Trifluoride
(NF3)
NF3 is a colorless gas with a
distinctly moldy odor. The World
Resources Institute (WRI)
indicates that NF3 has a 100-year
GWP of 17,200 (21).
NF3 is used in
industrial processes
and is produced in
the manufacturing of
semiconductors,
Liquid Crystal Display
(LCD) panels, types
of solar panels, and
chemical lasers.
Long-term or repeated
exposure may affect the liver
and kidneys and may cause
fluorosis (22).
The potential health effects related directly to the emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O as they relate
to development projects such as the proposed Project are still being debated in the scientific
community. Their cumulative effects to GCC have the potential to cause adverse effects to
human health. Increases in Earth’s ambient temperatures would result in more intense heat
waves, causing more heat-related deaths. Scientists also purport that higher ambient
temperatures would increase disease survival rates and result in more widespread disease.
Climate change will likely cause shifts in weather patterns, potentially resulting in devastating
droughts and food shortages in some areas (23). Exhibit 2-A presents the potential impacts of
global warming (24).
EXHIBIT 2-A: SUMMARY OF PROJECTED GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT, 2070-2099 (AS COMPARED WITH 1961-1990)
Source: Barbara H. Allen-Diaz. “Climate change affects us all.” University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2009.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
15
2.4 GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL
GHGs have varying GWP values. GWP of a GHG indicates the amount of warming a gas causes
over a given period of time and represents the potential of a gas to trap heat in the atmosphere.
CO2 is utilized as the reference gas for GWP, and thus has a GWP of 1. CO2 equivalent (CO2e) is a
term used for describing the difference GHGs in a common unit. CO2e signifies the amount of CO2
which would have the equivalent GWP.
The atmospheric lifetime and GWP of selected GHGs are summarized at Table 2-2. As shown in
the table below, GWP for the Second Assessment Report (SAR), the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC)’s scientific and socio-economic assessment on climate change, range from
1 for CO2 to 23,900 for SF6 and GWP for the IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report range from 1 for CO2 to
23,500 for SF6 (25).
TABLE 2-2: GWP AND ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME OF SELECT GHGS
Gas Atmospheric Lifetime
(years)
Global Warming Potential (100-year time horizon)
2nd SAR 5th SAR
CO2 See* 1 1
CH4 12 .4 21 28
N2O 121 310 265
HFC-23 222 11,700 12,400
HFC-134a 13.4 1,300 1,300
HFC-152a 1.5 140 138
SF6 3,200 23,900 23,500
*As per Appendix 8.A. of IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report, no single lifetime can be given.
Source: Table 2.14 of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007
2.5 GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORIES
2.5.1 GLOBAL
Worldwide anthropogenic GHG emissions are tracked by the IPCC for industrialized nations
(referred to as Annex I) and developing nations (referred to as Non-Annex I). Human GHG
emissions data for Annex I nations are available through 2017. Based on the latest available data,
the sum of these emissions totaled approximately 29,216,501 gigagram (Gg) CO2e1 (26) (27) as
summarized on Table 2-3.
1 The global emissions are the sum of Annex I and non-Annex I countries, without counting Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF).
For countries without 2017 data, the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) data for the most recent year
were used. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, “Annex I Parties – GHG total without LULUCF,” The most recent GHG
emissions for China and India are from 2014.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
16
2.5.2 UNITED STATES
As noted in Table 2-3, the United States, as a single country, was the number two producer of
GHG emissions in 2017.
TABLE 2-3: TOP GHG PRODUCING COUNTRIES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 2
Emitting Countries GHG Emissions (Gg CO2e)
China 11,911,710
United States 6,456,718
European Union (28-member countries) 4,323,163
India 3,079,810
Russian Federation 2,155,470
Japan 1,289,630
Total 29,216,501
2.5.3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California has significantly slowed the rate of growth of GHG emissions due to the
implementation of energy efficiency programs as well as adoption of strict emission controls, but
is still a substantial contributor to the United States (U.S.) emissions inventory total (28). The
California Air Resource Board (CARB) compiles GHG inventories for the State of California. Based
upon the 2019 GHG inventory data (i.e., the latest year for which data are available) for the 2000-
2017 GHG emissions period, California emitted an average 424.1 million metric tons of CO2e per
year (MMTCO2e/yr) (29).
2.6 EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CALIFORNIA
2.6.1 PUBLIC HEALTH
Higher temperatures may increase the frequency, duration, and intensity of conditions conducive
to air pollution formation. For example, days with weather conducive to ozone formation could
increase from 25 to 35% under the lower warming range to 75 to 85% under the medium
warming range. In addition, if global background ozone levels increase as pre dicted in some
scenarios, it may become impossible to meet local air quality standards. Air quality could be
further compromised by increases in wildfires, which emit fine particulate matter that can travel
long distances, depending on wind conditions. The Climate Scenarios report indicates that large
wildfires could become up to 55% more frequent if GHG emissions are not significantly reduced.
In addition, under the higher warming range scenario, there could be up to 100 more days per
year with temperatures above 90F in Los Angeles and 95F in Sacramento by 2100. This is a large
increase over historical patterns and approximately twice the increase projected if temperatures
2 Used http://unfccc.int data for Annex I countries. Consulted the CAIT Climate Data Explorer in https://www.climatewatchdata.org site to
reference Non-Annex I countries of China and India.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
17
remain within or below the lower warming range. Rising temperatures could increase the risk of
death from dehydration, heat stroke/exhaustion, heart attack, stroke, and respiratory distress
caused by extreme heat.
2.6.2 WATER RESOURCES
A vast network of man-made reservoirs and aqueducts captures and transports water throughout
the state from northern California rivers and the Colorado River. The current distribution system
relies on Sierra Nevada snowpack to supply water during the dry spring and summer months.
Rising temperatures, potentially compounded by decreases in precipitation, could severely
reduce spring snowpack, increasing the risk of summer water shortages.
If temperatures continue to increase, more precipitation could fall as rain instead of snow, and
the snow that does fall could melt earlier, reducing the Sierra Nevada spring snowpack by as
much as 70 to 90%. Under the lower warming range scenario, snowpack losses could be only half
as large as those possible if temperatures were to rise to the higher warming range. How much
snowpack could be lost depends in part on future precipitation patterns, the projections for
which remain uncertain. However, even under the wetter climate projections, the loss of
snowpack could pose challenges to water managers and hamper hydropower generation, which
could adversely affect winter tourism. Under the lower warming range, the ski season at lower
elevations could be reduced by as much as a month. If temperatures reach the higher warming
range and precipitation declines, there might be many years with insufficient snow for skiing and
snowboarding.
The State’s water supplies are also at risk from rising sea levels. An influx of saltwater could
degrade California’s estuaries, wetlands, and groundwater aquifers. Saltwater intrusion caused
by rising sea levels is a major threat to the quality and reliability of water within the southern
edge of the Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta – a major fresh water supply.
2.6.3 AGRICULTURE
Increased temperatures could cause widespread changes to the agriculture industry reducing the
quantity and quality of agricultural products statewide. First, California farmers could possibly
lose as much as 25% of the water supply needed. Although higher CO2 levels can stimulate plant
production and increase plant water-use efficiency, California’s farmers could face greater water
demand for crops and a less reliable water supply as temperatures rise. Crop growth and
development could change, as could the intensity and frequency of pest and disease outbreaks.
Rising temperatures could aggravate ozone pollution, which makes plants more susceptible to
disease and pests and interferes with plant growth.
Plant growth tends to be slow at low temperatures, increasing with rising temperatures up to a
threshold. However, faster growth can result in less-than-optimal development for many crops,
so rising temperatures could worsen the quantity and quality of yield for a number of California’s
agricultural products. Products likely to be most affected include wine grapes, fruits and nuts.
In addition, continued GCC could shift the ranges of existing invasive plants and weeds and alter
competition patterns with native plants. Range expansion could occur in many species while
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
18
range contractions may be less likely in rapidly evolving species with significant populations
already established. Should range contractions occur, new or different weed species could fill the
emerging gaps. Continued GCC could alter the abundance and types of many pests, lengthen
pests’ breeding season, and increase pathogen growth rates.
2.6.4 FORESTS AND LANDSCAPES
GCC has the potential to intensify the current threat to forests and landscapes by increasing the
risk of wildfire and altering the distribution and character of natural vegetation. If temperatures
rise into the medium warming range, the risk of large wildfires in California could increase by as
much as 55%, which is almost twice the increase expected if temperatures stay in the lower
warming range. However, since wildfire risk is determined by a combination of factors, including
precipitation, winds, temperature, and landscape and vegetation conditions, future risks will not
be uniform throughout the state. In contrast, wildfires in northern California could increase by
up to 90% due to decreased precipitation.
Moreover, continued GCC has the potential to alter natural ecosystems and biological diversity
within the state. For example, alpine and subalpine ecosystems could decline by as much as 60
to 80% by the end of the century as a result of increasing temperatures. The productivity of the
state’s forests has the potential to decrease as a result of GCC.
Rising Sea Levels
Rising sea levels, more intense coastal storms, and warmer water temperatures could
increasingly threaten the state’s coastal regions. Under the higher warming range scena rio, sea
level is anticipated to rise 22 to 35 inches by 2100. Elevations of this magnitude would inundate
low-lying coastal areas with saltwater, accelerate coastal erosion, threaten vital levees and inland
water systems, and disrupt wetlands and natural habitats. Under the lower warming range
scenario, sea level could rise 12-14 inches.
2.7 REGULATORY SETTING
2.7.1 INTERNATIONAL
Climate change is a global issue involving GHG emissions from all around the world; therefore,
countries such as the ones discussed below have made an effort to reduce GHGs.
IPCC
In 1988, the United Nations (U.N.) and the World Meteorological Organization established the IPCC
to assess the scientific, technical and socioeconomic information relevant to understanding the
scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts, and options for
adaptation and mitigation.
UNITED NATION’S FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (CONVENTION)
On March 21, 1994, the U.S. joined a number of countries around the world in signing the
Convention. Under the Convention, governments gather and share information on GHG
emissions, national policies, and best practices; launch national strategies for addressing GHG
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
19
emissions and adapting to expected impacts, including the provision of financial and
technological support to developing countries; and cooperate in preparing for adaptation to the
impacts of climate change.
INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE TREATIES
The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement linked to the Convention. The major feature
of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the
European community for reducing GHG emissions at an average of 5% against 1990 levels over
the five-year period 2008–2012. The Convention (as discussed above) encouraged industrialized
countries to stabilize emissions; however, the Protocol commits them to do so. Developed
countries have contributed more emissions over the last 150 years; therefore, the Protocol places
a heavier burden on developed nations under the principle of “common but differentiated
responsibilities.”
In 2001, President George W. Bush indicated that he would not submit the treaty to the U.S.
Senate for ratification, which effectively ended American involvement in the Kyoto Protocol. In
December 2009, international leaders met in Copenhagen to address the future of international
climate change commitments post-Kyoto. No binding agreement was reached in Copenhagen;
however, the Committee identified the long-term goal of limiting the maximum global average
temperature increase to no more than 2 degrees Celsius (°C) above pre-industrial levels, subject
to a review in 2015. The UN Climate Change Committee held additional meetings in Durban,
South Africa in November 2011; Doha, Qatar in November 2012; and Warsaw, Poland in
November 2013. The meetings are gradually gaining consensus among participants on individual
climate change issues.
On September 23, 2014 more than 100 Heads of State and Government and leaders from the
private sector and civil society met at the Climate Summit in New York hosted by the U.N. At the
Summit, heads of government, business and civil society announced actions in areas that would
have the greatest impact on reducing emissions, including climate finance, energy, transport,
industry, agriculture, cities, forests, and building resilience.
Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) reached a landmark
agreement on December 12, 2015 in Paris, charting a fundamentally new course in the two-
decade-old global climate effort. Culminating a four-year negotiating round, the new treaty ends
the strict differentiation between developed and developing countries that characterized earlier
efforts, replacing it with a common framework that commits all countries to put forward their
best efforts and to strengthen them in the years ahead. This includes, for the first time,
requirements that all parties report regularly on their emissions and implementation efforts and
undergo international review.
The agreement and a companion decision by parties were the key outcomes of the conference,
known as the 21st session of the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP) 21. Together, the Paris
Agreement and the accompanying COP decision:
• Reaffirm the goal of limiting global temperature increase well below 2°C, while urging
efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees;
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
20
• Establish binding commitments by all parties to make “nationally determined
contributions” (NDCs), and to pursue domestic measures aimed at achieving them;
• Commit all countries to report regularly on their emissions and “progress made in
implementing and achieving” their NDCs, and to undergo international review;
• Commit all countries to submit new NDCs every five years, with the clear expectation that
they will “represent a progression” beyond previous ones;
• Reaffirm the binding obligations of developed countries under the UNFCCC to support the
efforts of developing countries, while for the first time encouraging voluntary contributions
by developing countries too;
• Extend the current goal of mobilizing $100 billion a year in support by 2020 through 2025,
with a new, higher goal to be set for the period after 2025;
• Extend a mechanism to address “loss and damage” resulting from climate change, which
explicitly will not “involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation;”
• Require parties engaging in international emissions trading to avoid “double counting;” and
• Call for a new mechanism, similar to the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto
Protocol, enabling emission reductions in one country to be counted toward another
country’s NDC (C2ES 2015a) (30).
On November 4, 2019, the Trump administration formally notified the U.N. that the United States
would withdraw from the Paris Agreement. It should be noted that withdrawal would be effective
one year after notification in 2020.
2.7.2 NATIONAL
Prior to the last decade, there have been no concrete federal regulations of GHGs or major
planning for climate change adaptation. The following are actions regarding the federal
government, GHGs, and fuel efficiency.
GHG ENDANGERMENT
In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 549 U.S. 497 (2007), decided on April
2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court (U.S. Court) found that four GHGs, including CO2, are
air pollutants subject to regulation under Section 202(a)(1) of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA).
The Court held that the EPA Administrator must determine whether emissions of GHGs from new
motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution, which may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned
decision. On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings regarding
GHGs under section 202(a) of the CAA:
• Endangerment Finding: The Administrator finds that the current and projected concentrations of
the six key well-mixed GHGs— CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6—in the atmosphere threaten
the public health and welfare of current and future generations.
• Cause or Contribute Finding: The Administrator finds that the combined emissions of these well-
mixed GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG
pollution, which threatens public health and welfare.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
21
These findings do not impose requirements on industry or other entities. However, this was a
prerequisite for implementing GHG emissions standards for vehicles, as discussed in the section
“Clean Vehicles” below. After a lengthy legal challenge, the U.S. Court declined to review an
Appeals Court ruling that upheld the EPA Administrator’s findings (31).
CLEAN VEHICLES
Congress first passed the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law in 1975 to increase the fuel
economy of cars and light duty trucks. The law has become more stringent over time. On May
19, 2009, President Obama put in motion a new national policy to increase fuel economy for all
new cars and trucks sold in the U.S. On April 1, 2010, the EPA and the Department of
Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced a joint final
rule establishing a national program that would reduce GHG emissions and improve fuel
economy for new cars and trucks sold in the U.S.
The first phase of the national program applies to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-
duty (MD) passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. They require these
vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of CO2 per mile,
equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg) if the automobile industry were to meet this CO2 level
solely through fuel economy improvements. Together, these standards would cut CO2 emissions
by an estimated 960 million metric tons and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the
vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012–2016). The EPA and the NHTSA issued final
rules on a second-phase joint rulemaking establishing national standards for light-duty vehicles
for model years 2017 through 2025 in August 2012. The new standards for model years 2017
through 2025 apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and MD passenger vehicles. The final
standards are projected to result in an average industry fleetwide level of 163 grams/mile of CO2
in model year 2025, which is equivalent to 54.5 mpg if achieved exclusively through fuel economy
improvements.
The EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation issued final rules for the first national
standards to reduce GHG emissions and improve fuel efficiency of heavy-duty trucks (HDT) and
buses on September 15, 2011, effective November 14, 2011. For combination tractors, the
agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards that begin in the 2014 model year and
achieve up to a 20% reduction in CO2 emissions and fuel consumption by the 2018 model year.
For HDT and vans, the agencies are proposing separate gasoline and diesel truck standards, which
phase in starting in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 10% reduction for gasoline vehicles
and a 15% reduction for diesel vehicles by the 2018 model year (12 and 17% respectively if
accounting for air conditioning leakage). Lastly, for vocational vehicles, the engine and vehicle
standards would achieve up to a 10% reduction in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions from the
2014 to 2018 model years.
On April 2, 2018, the EPA signed the Mid-term Evaluation Final Determination, which finds that
the model year 2022-2025 GHG standards are not appropriate and should be revised (32). This
Final Determination serves to initiate a notice to further consider appropriate standards for
model year 2022-2025 light-duty vehicles. On August 24, 2018, the EPA and NHTSA published a
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
22
proposal to freeze the model year 2020 standards through model year 2026 and to revoke
California’s waiver under the CAA to establish more stringent standards (33).
MANDATORY REPORTING OF GHGS
The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008, passed in December 2007, requires the
establishment of mandatory GHG reporting requirements. On September 22, 2009, the EPA
issued the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHGs Rule, which became effective January 1, 2010.
The rule requires reporting of GHG emissions from large sources and suppliers in the U.S. and is
intended to collect accurate and timely emissions data to inform future policy decisions. Under
the rule, suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and
facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons per year (MT/yr) or more of GHG emissions are required
to submit annual reports to the EPA.
NEW SOURCE REVIEW
The EPA issued a final rule on May 13, 2010, that establishes thresholds for GHGs that define
when permits under the New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V
Operating Permit programs are required for new and existing industrial facilities. This final rule
“tailors” the requirements of these CAA permitting programs to limit which facilities will be
required to obtain Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V permits. In the preamble
to the revisions to the Federal Code of Regulations, the EPA states:
“This rulemaking is necessary because without it the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Title V requirements would apply, as of January 2, 2011, at the
100 or 250 tons per year levels provided under the CAA, greatly increasing the
number of required permits, imposing undue costs on small sources, overwhelming
the resources of permitting authorities, and severely impairing the functioning of
the programs. EPA is relieving these resource burdens by phasing in the
applicability of these programs to GHG sources, starting with the largest GHG
emitters. This rule establishes two initial steps of the phase-in. The rule also
commits the agency to take certain actions on future steps addressing smaller
sources but excludes certain smaller sources from Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Title V permitting for GHG emissions until at least April 30,
2016.”
The EPA estimates that facilities responsible for nearly 70% of the national GHG emissions from
stationary sources will be subject to permitting requirements under this rule. This includes the
nation’s largest GHG emitters—power plants, refineries, and cement production facilities.
STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR GHG EMISSIONS FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES: ELECTRIC UTILITY GENERATING
UNITS
As required by a settlement agreement, the EPA proposed new performance standards for
emissions of CO2 for new, affected, fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units on March 27,
2012. New sources greater than 25 megawatts (MW) would be required to meet an output-
based standard of 1,000 pounds (lbs) of CO2 per MW-hour (MWh), based on the performance of
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
23
widely used natural gas combined cycle technology. It should be noted that on February 9, 2016
the U.S. Court issued a stay of this regulation pending litigation. Additionally, the current EPA
Administrator has also signed a measure to repeal the Clean Power Plan, including the CO2
standards. The Clean Power Plan was officially repealed on June 19, 2019, when the EPA issued
the final Affordable Clean Energy rule (ACE). Under ACE, new state emission guidelines were
established that provided existing coal-fired electric utility generating units with achievable
standards.
CAP-AND-TRADE
Cap-and-trade refers to a policy tool where emissions are limited to a certain amount and can be
traded or provides flexibility on how the emitter can comply. Successful examples in the U.S.
include the Acid Rain Program and the N2O Budget Trading Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule
in the northeast. There is no federal GHG cap-and-trade program currently; however, some
states have joined to create initiatives to provide a mechanism for cap-and-trade.
The Regional GHG Initiative is an effort to reduce GHGs among the states of Connecticut,
Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and
Vermont. Each state caps CO2 emissions from power plants, auctions CO2 emission allowances,
and invests the proceeds in strategic energy programs that further reduce emissions, save
consumers money, create jobs, and build a clean energy economy. The Initiative began in 2008
and in 2020 has retained all participating states.
The Western Climate Initiative (WCI) partner jurisdictions have developed a comprehensive
initiative to reduce regional GHG emissions to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. The partners were
originally California, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. However, Manitoba and
Ontario are not currently participating. California linked with Quebec’s cap-and-trade system
January 1, 2014, and joint offset auctions took place in 2015. While the WCI has yet to publish
whether it has successfully reached the 2020 emissions goal initiative set in 2007, SB 32, requires
that California, a major partner in the WCI, adopt the goal of reducing statewide GHG emissions
to 40% below the 1990 level by 2030.
SMARTWAY PROGRAM
The SmartWay Program is a public-private initiative between the EPA, large and small trucking
companies, rail carriers, logistics companies, commercial manufacturers, retailers, and other
federal and state agencies. Its purpose is to improve fuel efficiency and the environmental
performance (reduction of both GHG emissions and air pollution) of the goods movement supply
chains. SmartWay is comprised of four components (34):
1. SmartWay Transport Partnership: A partnership in which freight carriers and shippers commit to
benchmark operations, track fuel consumption, and improve performance annually.
2. SmartWay Technology Program: A testing, verification, and designation program to help freight
companies identify equipment, technologies, and strategies that save fuel and lower emissions.
3. SmartWay Vehicles: A program that ranks light‐duty cars and small trucks and identifies superior
environmental performers with the SmartWay logo.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
24
4. SmartWay International Interests: Guidance and resources for countries seeking to develop
freight sustainability programs modeled after SmartWay.
SmartWay effectively refers to requirements geared towards reducing fuel consumption. Most
large trucking fleets driving newer vehicles are compliant with SmartWay design requirements.
Moreover, over time, all HDTs will have to comply with the CARB GHG Regulation that is designed
with the SmartWay Program in mind, to reduce GHG emissions by making them more fuel-
efficient. For instance, in 2015, 53 foot or longer dry vans or refrigerated trailers equipped with
a combination of SmartWay-verified low-rolling resistance tires and SmartWay-verified
aerodynamic devices would obtain a total of 10% or more fuel savings over traditional trailers.
Through the SmartWay Technology Program, the EPA has evaluated the fuel saving benefits of
various devices through grants, cooperative agreements, emissions and fuel economy testing,
demonstration projects and technical literature review. As a result, the EPA has determined the
following types of technologies provide fuel saving and/or emission reducing benefits when used
properly in their designed applications, and has verified certain products:
• Idle reduction technologies – less idling of the engine when it is not needed would reduce
fuel consumption.
• Aerodynamic technologies minimize drag and improve airflow over the entire tractor‐trailer
vehicle. Aerodynamic technologies include gap fairings that reduce turbulence between
the tractor and trailer, side skirts that minimize wind under the trailer, and rear fairings that
reduce turbulence and pressure drop at the rear of the trailer.
• Low rolling resistance tires can roll longer without slowing down, thereby reducing the
amount of fuel used. Rolling resistance (or rolling friction or rolling drag) is the force
resisting the motion when a tire rolls on a surface. The wheel will eventually slow down
because of this resistance.
• Retrofit technologies include things such as diesel particulate filters, emissions upgrades (to
a higher tier), etc., which would reduce emissions.
• Federal excise tax exemptions.
2.7.3 CALIFORNIA
LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS TO REDUCE GHGS
The State of California legislature has enacted a series of bills that constitute the most aggressive
program to reduce GHGs of any state in the nation. Some legislation such as the landmark AB 32
was specifically enacted to address GHG emissions. Other legislation such as Title 24 and Title 20
energy standards were originally adopted for other purposes such as energy and water
conservation, but also provide GHG reductions. This section describes the major provisions of
the legislation.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
25
AB 32
The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, which required that GHGs emitted in California
be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020 (this goal has been met3). GHGs as defined under AB
32 include CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. Since AB 32 was enacted, a seventh chemical, NF3,
has also been added to the list of GHGs. The CARB is the state agency charged with monitoring
and regulating sources of GHGs. AB 32 states the following:
“Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health,
natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse
impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a
reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack,
a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses
and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and
an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human
health-related problems.”
SB 32
On September 8, 2016, Governor Jerry Brown signed the SB 32 and its companion bill, AB 197.
SB 32 requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030,
a reduction target that was first introduced in Executive Order B-30-15. The new legislation builds
upon the AB 32 goal and provides an intermediate goal to achieving S -3-05, which sets a
statewide GHG reduction target of 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. AB 197 creates a legislative
committee to oversee regulators to ensure that CARB not only responds to the Governor, but
also the Legislature (11).
CARB SCOPING PLAN UPDATE
In November 2017, CARB released the Final 2017 Scoping Plan Update (2017 Scoping Plan),
which identifies the State’s post-2020 reduction strategy. The 2017 Scoping Plan reflects the 2030
target of a 40% reduction below 1990 levels, set by Executive Order B-30-15 and codified by SB
32. Key programs that the proposed Second Update builds upon include the Cap-and-Trade
Regulation, the LCFS, and much cleaner cars, trucks and freight movement, utilizing cleaner,
renewable energy, and strategies to reduce CH4 emissions from agricultural and other wastes.
The 2017 Scoping Plan establishes a new emissions limit of 260 MMTCO2e for the year 2030,
which corresponds to a 40% decrease in 1990 levels by 2030 (35).
California’s climate strategy will require contributions from all sectors of the economy, including
the land base, and will include enhanced focus on zero- and near-zero-emission (ZE/NZE) vehicle
technologies; continued investment in renewables, including solar roofs, wind, and other
distributed generation; greater use of low carbon fuels; integrated land conservation and
development strategies; coordinated efforts to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants
3 Based upon the 2019 GHG inventory data (i.e., the latest year for which data are available) for the 2000-2017 GHG emissions
period, California emitted an average 424.1 MMTCO2e (51). This is less than the 2020 emissions target of 431 MMTCO2e.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
26
(CH4, black carbon, and fluorinated gases); and an increased focus on integrated land use
planning to support livable, transit-connected communities and conservation of agricultural and
other lands. Requirements for direct GHG reductions at refineries will further support air quality
co-benefits in neighborhoods, including in disadvantaged communities historically located
adjacent to these large stationary sources, as well as efforts with California’s local air pollution
control and air quality management districts (air districts) to tighten emission limits on a broad
spectrum of industrial sources. Major elements of the 2017 Scoping Plan framework include:
• Implementing and/or increasing the standards of the Mobile Source Strategy, which include
increasing ZEV buses and trucks.
• LCFS, with an increased stringency (18% by 2030).
• Implementing SB 350, which expands the RPS to 50% RPS and doubles energy efficiency
savings by 2030.
• California Sustainable Freight Action Plan, which improves freight system efficiency, utilizes
near-zero emissions technology, and deployment of zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) trucks.
• Implementing the proposed Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy (SLPS), which focuses on
reducing CH4 and hydroflurocarbon emissions by 40% and anthropogenic black carbon
emissions by 50% by year 2030.
• Continued implementation of SB 375.
• Post-2020 Cap-and-Trade Program that includes declining caps.
• 20% reduction in GHG emissions from refineries by 2030.
• Development of a Natural and Working Lands Action Plan to secure California’s land base
as a net carbon sink.
Note, however, that the 2017 Scoping Plan Update acknowledges that:
“[a]chieving net zero increases in GHG emissions, resulting in no contribution to
GHG impacts, may not be feasible or appropriate for every project, however, and
the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to net zero does not imply
the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significant
environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.”
In addition to the statewide strategies listed above, the Final 2017 Scoping Plan also identifies
local governments as essential partners in achieving the State’s long-term GHG reduction goals
and identifies local actions to reduce GHG emissions. As part of the recommended actions, CARB
recommends that local governments achieve a community-wide goal to achieve emissions of no
more than 6 metric tons of CO2e (MTCO2e) or less per capita by 2030 and 2 MTCO2e or less per
capita by 2050. For CEQA projects, CARB states that lead agencies may develop evidenced-based
bright-line numeric thresholds—consistent with the 2017 Scoping Plan and the State’s long-term
GHG goals—and projects with emissions over that amount may be required to incorporate on-
site design features and mitigation measures (MM) that avoid or minimize project emissions to
the degree feasible; or, a performance-based metric using a CAP or other plan to reduce GHG
emissions is appropriate.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
27
According to research conducted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) and
supported by CARB, California, under its existing and proposed GHG reduction policies, could
achieve the 2030 goals under SB 32. The research utilized a new, validated model known as the
California LBNL GHG Analysis of Policies Spreadsheet (CALGAPS), which simulates GHG and
criteria pollutant emissions in California from 2010 to 2050 in accordance to existing and future
GHG-reducing policies. The CALGAPS model showed that by 2030, emissions could range from
211 to 428 MTCO2e per year (MTCO2e/yr), indicating that “even if all modeled policies are not
implemented, reductions could be sufficient to reduce emissions 40% below the 1990 level [of
SB 32].” CALGAPS analyzed emissions through 2050 even though it did not generally account for
policies that might be put in place after 2030. Although the research indicated that the emissions
would not meet the State’s 80% reduction goal by 2050, various combinations of policies could
allow California’s cumulative emissions to remain very low through 2050 (36) (37).
CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAM
The 2017 Scoping Plan identifies a Cap-and-Trade Program as one of the key strategies for
California to reduce GHG emissions. According to CARB, a cap-and-trade program will help put
California on the path to meet its goal of achieving a 40% reduction in GHG emissions from 1990
levels by 2030. Under cap-and-trade, an overall limit on GHG emissions from capped sectors is
established, and facilities subject to the cap will be able to trade permits to emit GHGs within the
overall limit.
CARB adopted a California Cap-and-Trade Program pursuant to its authority under AB 32. The
Cap-and-Trade Program is designed to reduce GHG emissions from regulated entities by more
than 16% between 2013 and 2020, and by an additional 40% by 2030. The statewide cap for GHG
emissions from the capped sectors (e.g., electricity generation, petroleum refining, and cement
production) commenced in 2013 and will decline over time, achieving GHG emission reductions
throughout the program’s duration.
Covered entities that emit more than 25.000 MTCO2e/yr must comply with the Cap-and-Trade
Program. Triggering of the 25.000 MTCO2e/yr “inclusion threshold” is measured against a subset
of emissions reported and verified under the California Regulation for the Mandatory Reporting
of GHG Emissions (Mandatory Reporting Rule or “MRR”).
Under the Cap-and-Trade Program, CARB issues allowances equal to the total amount of
allowable emissions over a given compliance period and distributes these to regulated entities.
Covered entities are allocated free allowances in whole or part (if eligible), and may buy
allowances at auction, purchase allowances from others, or purchase offset credits. Each covered
entity with a compliance obligation is required to surrender “compliance instruments” for each
MTCO2e of GHG they emit. There also are requirements to surrender compliance instruments
covering 30% of the prior year’s compliance obligation by November of each year (38).
The Cap-and-Trade Program provides a firm cap, which provides the highest certainty of
achieving the 2030 target. An inherent feature of the Cap-and-Trade program is that it does not
guarantee GHG emissions reductions in any discrete location or by any particular source. Rather,
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
28
GHG emissions reductions are only guaranteed on an accumulative basis. As summarized by
CARB in the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan:
“The Cap-and-Trade Regulation gives companies the flexibility to trade allowances
with others or take steps to cost-effectively reduce emissions at their own facilities.
Companies that emit more have to turn in more allowances or other compliance
instruments. Companies that can cut their GHG emissions have to turn in fewer
allowances. But as the cap declines, aggregate emissions must be reduced. In other
words, a covered entity theoretically could increase its GHG emissions every year
and still comply with the Cap-and-Trade Program if there is a reduction in GHG
emissions from other covered entities. Such a focus on aggregate GHG emissions
is considered appropriate because climate change is a global phenomenon, and
the effects of GHG emissions are considered cumulative.” (39)
The Cap-and-Trade Program covered approximately 80% of California’s GHG emissions (35). The
Cap-and-Trade Program covers the GHG emissions associated with electricity consumed in
California, whether generated in-state or imported. Accordingly, GHG emissions associated with
CEQA projects’ electricity usage are covered by the Cap-and-Trade Program. The Cap-and-Trade
Program also covers fuel suppliers (natural gas and propane fuel providers and transportation
fuel providers) to address emissions from such fuels and from combustion of other fossil fuels
not directly covered at large sources in the Program’s first compliance period. The Cap-and-Trade
Program covers the GHG emissions associated with the combustion of transportation fuels in
California, whether refined in-state or imported.
SB 375
Passing the Senate on August 30, 2008, SB 375 was signed by the Governor on September 30, 2008.
According to SB 375, the transportation sector is the largest contributor of GHG emissions, which
emits over 40% of the total GHG emissions in California. SB 375 states, “Without improved land use
and transportation policy, California will not be able to achieve the goals of AB 32.” SB 375 does the
following: it (1) requires metropolitan planning organizations to include sustainable community
strategies in their regional transportation plans for reducing GHG emissions, (2) aligns planning for
transportation and housing, and (3) creates specified incentives for the implementation of the
strategies.
Concerning CEQA, SB 375, as codified in Public Resources Code Section 21159.2 8, states that
CEQA findings for certain projects are not required to reference, describe, or discuss (1) growth
inducing impacts, or (2) any project-specific or cumulative impacts from cars and light-duty truck
trips generated by the project on global warming or the regional transportation network, if the
project:
1. Is in an area with an approved sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning
strategy that the CARB accepts as achieving the GHG emission reduction targets.
2. Is consistent with that strategy (in designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies).
3. Incorporates the MMs required by an applicable prior environmental document.
AB 1493
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
29
California AB 1493, enacted on July 22, 2002, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations
that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. Implementation of the
regulation was delayed by lawsuits filed by automakers and by the EPA’s denial of an
implementation waiver. The EPA subsequently granted the requested waiver in 2009, which was
upheld by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2011.
The standards phase in during the 2009 through 2016 model years. When fully phased in, the
near-term (2009–2012) standards will result in about a 22% reduction compared with the 2002
fleet, and the mid-term (2013–2016) standards will result in about a 30% reduction. Several
technologies stand out as providing significant reductions in emissions at favorable costs. These
include discrete variable valve lift or camless valve actuation to optimize valve operation rather
than relying on fixed valve timing and lift as has historically been done; turbocharging to boost
power and allow for engine downsizing; improved multi-speed transmissions; and improved air
conditioning systems that operate optimally, leak less, and/or use an alternative refrigerant.
The second phase of the implementation for the Pavley bill was incorporated into Amendments
to the Low-Emission Vehicle Program (LEV III) or the Advanced Clean Cars program. The
Advanced Clean Car program combines the control of smog-causing pollutants and GHG
emissions into a single coordinated package of requirements for model years 2017 through 2025.
The regulation will reduce GHGs from new cars by 34% from 2016 levels by 2025. The new rules
will clean up gasoline and diesel-powered cars, and deliver increasing numbers of zero-emission
technologies, such as full battery electric cars, newly emerging plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
(EV) and hydrogen fuel cell cars. The package will also ensure adequate fueling infrastructure is
available for the increasing numbers of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles planned for deployment in
California.
CLEAN ENERGY AND POLLUTION REDUCTION ACT OF 2015 (SB 350)
In October 2015, the legislature approved, and the Governor signed SB 350, which reaffirms
California’s commitment to reducing its GHG emissions and addressing climate change. Key
provisions include an increase in the RPS, higher energy efficiency requirements for buildings,
initial strategies towards a regional electricity grid, and improved infrastructure for EV charging
stations. Provisions for a 50% reduction in the use of petroleum statewide were removed from
the Bill because of opposition and concern that it would prevent the Bill’s passage. Specifically,
SB 350 requires the following to reduce statewide GHG emissions:
• Increase the amount of electricity procured from renewable energy sources from 33% to
50% by 2030, with interim targets of 40% by 2024, and 25% by 2027.
• Double the energy efficiency in existing buildings by 2030. This target will be achieved
through the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the California Energy Commission
(CEC), and local publicly owned utilities.
• Reorganize the Independent System Operator (ISO) to develop more regional electrify
transmission markets and to improve accessibility in these markets, which will facilitate the
growth of renewable energy markets in the western United States.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
30
2.7.3.1 EXECUTIVE ORDERS RELATED TO GHG EMISSIONS
California’s Executive Branch has taken several actions to reduce GHGs through the use of
Executive Orders. Although not regulatory, they set the tone for the state and guide the actions
of state agencies.
EXECUTIVE ORDER B-55-18 AND SB 100
Executive Order B-55-18 and SB 100. SB 100 and Executive Order B-55-18 were signed by
Governor Brown on September 10, 2018. Under the existing RPS, 25% of retail sales are required
to be from renewable sources by December 31, 2016, 33% by December 31, 2020, 40% by
December 31, 2024, 45% by December 31, 2027, and 50% by December 31, 2030. SB 100 raises
California’s RPS requirement to 50% renewable resources target by December 31, 2026, and to
achieve a 60% target by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also requires that retail sellers and local
publicly owned electric utilities procure a minimum quantity of electricity products from eligible
renewable energy resources so that the total kilowatt hours (kWh) of those products sold to their
retail end-use customers achieve 44% of retail sales by December 31, 2024, 52% by December
31, 2027, and 60% by December 31, 2030. In addition to targets under AB 32 and SB 32, Executive
Order B-55-18 establishes a carbon neutrality goal for the state of California by 2045; and sets a
goal to maintain net negative emissions thereafter. The Executive Order directs the California
Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), the
California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), and CARB to include sequestration targets
in the Natural and Working Lands Climate Change Implementation Plan consistent with the
carbon neutrality goal.
EXECUTIVE ORDER S-3-05
Former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced on June 1, 2005, through
Executive Order S-3-05, the following reduction targets for GHG emissions:
• By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels.
• By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels.
• By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels.
The 2050 reduction goal represents what some scientists believe is necessary to reach levels that
will stabilize the climate. The 2020 goal was established to be a mid-term target. Because this is
an executive order, the goals are not legally enforceable for local governments or the private
sector.
EXECUTIVE ORDER S-01-07 (LCFS)
The Governor signed Executive Order S-01-07 on January 18, 2007. The order mandates that a
statewide goal shall be established to reduce the carbon intensity of California’s transportation
fuels by at least 10% by 2020. The CARB adopted the LCFS on April 23, 2009.
The LCFS was challenged in the U.S. District Court in Fresno in 2011. The court’s ruling issued on
December 29, 2011, included a preliminary injunction against CARB’s implementation of the rule.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the injunction on April 23, 2012, pending final ruling on
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
31
appeal, allowing CARB to continue to implement and enforce the regulation. The Ninth Circuit
Court’s decision, filed September 18, 2013, vacated the preliminary injunction. In essence, the
court held that LCFS adopted by CARB were not in conflict with federal law. On August 8, 2013,
the Fifth District Court of Appeal (California) ruled CARB failed to comply with CEQA and the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when adopting regulations for LCFS. In a partially published
opinion, the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment and directed issuance of a writ
of mandate setting aside Resolution 09-31 and two executive orders of CARB approving LCFS
regulations promulgated to reduce GHG emissions. However, the court tailored its remedy to
protect the public interest by allowing the LCFS regulations to remain operative while CARB
complies with the procedural requirements it failed to satisfy.
To address the Court ruling, CARB was required to bring a new LCFS regulation to the Board for
consideration in February 2015. The proposed LCFS regulation was required to contain revisions
to the 2010 LCFS as well as new provisions designed to foster investments in the production of
the low-carbon intensity fuels, offer additional flexibility to regulated parties, update critical
technical information, simplify and streamline program operations, and enhance enforcement.
On November 16, 2015 the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) approved the Final Rulemaking
Package. The new LCFS regulation became effective on January 1, 2016.
In 2018, the CARB approved amendments to the regulation, which included strengthening the
carbon intensity benchmarks through 2030 in compliance with the SB 32 GHG emissions
reduction target for 2030. The amendments included crediting opportunities to promote zero
emission vehicle adoption, alternative jet fuel, carbon capture and sequestration, and advanced
technologies to achieve deep decarbonization in the transportation sector (40).
EXECUTIVE ORDER S-13-08
Executive Order S-13-08 states that “climate change in California during the next century is
expected to shift precipitation patterns, accelerate sea level rise and increase temperatures,
thereby posing a serious threat to California’s economy, to the health and welfare of its
population and to its natural resources.” Pursuant to the requirements in the Order, the 2009
California Climate Adaptation Strategy (CNRA 2009) was adopted, which is the “…first statewide,
multi-sector, region-specific, and information-based climate change adaptation strategy in the
United States.” Objectives include analyzing risks of climate change in California, identifying and
exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and specifying a direction for future research.
EXECUTIVE ORDER B-30-15
On April 29, 2015, Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. issued an executive order to establish a
California GHG reduction target of 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. The Governor’s executive
order aligns California’s GHG reduction targets with those of leading international governments
ahead of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Paris late 2015. The Order sets a new interim
statewide GHG emission reduction target to reduce GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by
2030 in order to ensure California meets its target of reducing GHG emissions to 80% below 1990
levels by 2050 and directs CARB to update the Climate Change Scoping Plan to express the 2030
target in terms of MMTCO2e. The Order also requires the state’s climate adaptation plan to be
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
32
updated every three years, and for the State to continue its climate change research program,
among other provisions. As with Executive Order S-3-05, this Order is not legally enforceable for
local governments and the private sector. Legislation that would update AB 32 to make post
2020 targets and requirements a mandate is in process in the State Legislature.
2.7.3.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES
California has a long history of adopting regulations to improve energy efficiency in new and
remodeled buildings. These regulations have kept California’s energy consumption relatively flat
even with rapid population growth.
TITLE 20 CCR
CCR, Title 20: Division 2, Chapter 4, Article 4, Sections 1601-1608: Appliance Efficiency
Regulations regulates the sale of appliances in California. The Appliance Efficiency Regulations
include standards for both federally regulated appliances and non-federally regulated appliances.
23 categories of appliances are included in the scope of these regulations. The standards within
these regulations apply to appliances that are sold or offered for sale in California, except those
sold wholesale in California for final retail sale outside the state and those designed and sold
exclusively for use in recreational vehicles or other mobile equipment (CEC 2012).
TITLE 24 CCR
CCR Title 24 Part 6: California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential
Buildings, was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s
energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible
incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. Energy efficient buildings
require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption
and decreases GHG emissions. The 2019 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and became
effective on January 1, 2020.
The CEC indicates that the 2019 Title 24 standards will require solar photovoltaic systems for new
homes, establish requirements for newly constructed healthcare facilities, encourage demand
responsive technologies for residential buildings, update indoor and outdoor lighting for
nonresidential buildings. The CEC anticipates that single-family homes built with the 2019
standards will use approximately 7% less energy compared to the residential homes built under
the 2016 standards. Additionally, after implementation of solar photovoltaic systems, homes
built under the 2019 standards will use about 53% less energy than homes built under the 2016
standards. Nonresidential buildings will use approximately 30% less energy due to lighting
upgrades (41).
CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive
and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in
effect on January 1, 2011, and is administered by the (CBSC). CALGreen is updated on a regular
basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 201 9 California Green Building
Code Standards that have become effective on January 1, 2020. Local jurisdictions are permitted
to adopt more stringent requirements, as state law provides methods for local enhancements.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
33
CALGreen recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and
demolition ordinances and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided, they establish a
minimum 65% diversion requirement. The code also provides exemptions for areas not served
by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. The State Building Code provides the
minimum standard that buildings must meet in order to be certified for occupancy, which is
generally enforced by the local building official. 2019 CALGreen standards are applicable to the
Project and require (42):
• Short-term bicycle parking. If the new project or an additional alteration is anticipated to
generate visitor traffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the
visitors’ entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of new visitor motorized vehicle
parking spaces being added, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack (5.106.4.1.1).
• Long-term bicycle parking. For new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more
tenant-occupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5% of the tenant-occupant vehicular
parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility (5.106.4.1.2).
• Designated parking. In new projects or additions to alterations that add 10 or more vehicular
parking spaces, provide designated parking for any combination of low-emitting, fuel-efficient
and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in Table 5.106.5.2 (5.106.5.2).
• Construction waste management. Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of
the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section 5.408.1.1.
5.405.1.2, or 5.408.1.3; or meet a local construction and demolition waste management
ordinance, whichever is more stringent (5.408.1).
• Excavated soil and land clearing debris. 100% of trees, stumps, rocks and associated
vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reused or recycled. For a
phase project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed
(5.408.3).
• Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are
identified for the depositing, storage and collection of non-hazardous materials for recycling,
including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, organic waste, and
metals or meet a lawfully enacted local recycling ordinance, if more restrictive (5.410.1).
• Water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and
urinals) and fittings (faucets and showerheads) shall comply with the following:
o Water Closets. The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed 1.28
gallons per flush (5.303.3.1)
o Urinals. The effective flush volume of wall-mounted urinals shall not exceed 0.125
gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.1). The effective flush volume of floor-mounted or other
urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.2).
o Showerheads. Single showerheads shall have a minimum flow rate of not more than
1.8 gallons per minute and 80 psi (5.303.3.3.1). When a shower is served by more
than one showerhead, the combine flow rate of all showerheads and/or other
shower outlets controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per minute
at 80 psi (5.303.3.3.2).
o Faucets and fountains. Nonresidential lavatory faucets shall have a maximum flow
rate of note more than 0.5 gallons per minute at 60 psi (5.303.3.4.1). Kitchen
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
34
faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute of
60 psi (5.303.3.4.2). Wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate of not more
than 1.8 gallons per minute (5.303.3.4.3). Metering faucets shall not deliver more
than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.4). Metering faucets for wash fountains shall
have a maximum flow rate not more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.5).
• Outdoor portable water use in landscaped areas. Nonresidential developments shall comply
with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of
Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient (MWELO), whichever is more stringent (5.304.1).
• Water meters. Separate submeters or metering devices shall be installed for new buildings
or additions in excess of 50,000 sf or for excess consumption where any tenant within a new
building or within an addition that is project to consume more than 1,000 gal/day (5.303.1.1
and 5.303.1.2).
• Outdoor water use in rehabilitated landscape projects equal or greater than 2,500 sf.
Rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than
2,500 sf requiring a building or landscape permit (5.304.3).
• Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 sf and over, building commissioning shall be
included in the design and construction processes of the building project to verify that the
building systems and components meet the owner’s or owner representative’s project
requirements (5.410.2).
MWELO
The MWELO was required by AB 1881, the Water Conservation Act. The bill required local
agencies to adopt a local landscape ordinance at least as effective in conserving water as the
Model Ordinance by January 1, 2010. Governor Brown’s Drought Executive Order of April 1, 2015
(Executive Order B-29-15) directed Department of Water Resources (DWR) to update the
Ordinance through expedited regulation. The California Water Commission approved the revised
Ordinance on July 15, 2015 effective December 15, 2015. New development projects that include
landscape areas of 500 sf or more are subject to the Ordinance. The update requires:
• More efficient irrigation systems;
• Incentives for graywater usage;
• Improvements in on-site stormwater capture;
• Limiting the portion of landscapes that can be planted with high water use plants; and
• Reporting requirements for local agencies.
CARB REFRIGERANT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CARB adopted a regulation in 2009 to reduce refrigerant GHG emissions from stationary sources
through refrigerant leak detection and monitoring, leak repair, system retirement and
retrofitting, reporting and recordkeeping, and proper refrigerant cylinder use, sale, and disposal.
The regulation is set forth in sections 95380 to 95398 of Title 17, CCR. The rules implementing
the regulation establish a limit on statewide GHG emissions from stationary facilities with
refrigeration systems with more than 50 lbs of a high GWP refrigerant. The refrigerant
management program is designed to (1) reduce emissions of high-GWP GHG refrigerants from
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
35
leaky stationary, non-residential refrigeration equipment; (2) reduce emissions from the
installation and servicing of refrigeration and air-conditioning appliances using high-GWP
refrigerants; and (3) verify GHG emission reductions.
TRACTOR‐TRAILER GHG REGULATION
The tractors and trailers subject to this regulation must either use EPA SmartWay certified
tractors and trailers or retrofit their existing fleet with SmartWay verified technologies. The
regulation applies primarily to owners of 53-foot or longer box-type trailers, including both dry-
van and refrigerated-van trailers, and owners of the HD tractors that pull them on California
highways. These owners are responsible for replacing or retrofitting their affected vehicles with
compliant aerodynamic technologies and low rolling resistance tires. Sleeper cab tractors model
year 2011 and later must be SmartWay certified. All other tractors must use SmartWay verified
low rolling resistance tires. There are also requirements for trailers to have low rolling resistance
tires and aerodynamic devices.
PHASE I AND 2 HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE GHG STANDARDS
CARB has adopted a new regulation for GHG emissions from HDTs and engines sold in California.
It establishes GHG emission limits on truck and engine manufacturers and harmonizes with the
EPA rule for new trucks and engines nationally. Existing HD vehicle regulations in California
include engine criteria emission standards, tractor-trailer GHG requirements to implement
SmartWay strategies (i.e., the Heavy-Duty Tractor-Trailer GHG Regulation), and in-use fleet
retrofit requirements such as the Truck and Bus Regulation. In September 2011, the EPA adopted
their new rule for HDTs and engines. The EPA rule has compliance requirements for new
compression and spark ignition engines, as well as trucks from Class 2b through Class 8.
Compliance requirements begin with model year 2014 with stringency levels increasing through
model year 2018. The rule organizes truck compliance into three groupings, which include a) HD
pickups and vans; b) vocational vehicles; and c) combination tractors. The EPA rule does not
regulate trailers.
CARB staff has worked jointly with the EPA and the NHTSA on the next phase of federal GHG
emission standards for medium-duty trucks (MDT) and HDT vehicles, called federal Phase 2. The
federal Phase 2 standards were built on the improvements in engine and vehicle efficiency
required by the Phase 1 emission standards and represent a significant opportunity to achieve
further GHG reductions for 2018 and later model year HDT vehicles, including trailers. But as
discussed above, the EPA and NHTSA have proposed to roll back GHG and fuel economy
standards for cars and light-duty trucks, which suggests a similar rollback of Phase 2 standards
for MDT and HDT vehicles may be pursued.
SB 97 AND THE CEQA GUIDELINES UPDATE
Passed in August 2007, SB 97 added Section 21083.05 to the Public Resources Code. The code
states “(a) On or before July 1, 2009, the OPR shall prepare, develop, and transmit to the
Resources Agency guidelines for the mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions
as required by this division, including, but not limited to, effects associated with transportation
or energy consumption. (b) On or before January 1, 2010, the Resources Agency shall certify and
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
36
adopt guidelines prepared and developed by the OPR pursuant to subdivision (a).” Section 21097
was also added to the Public Resources Code. It provided CEQA protection until January 1, 2010
for transportation projects funded by the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port
Security Bond Act of 2006 or projects funded by the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention
Bond Act of 2006, in stating that the failure to analyze adequately the effects of GHGs would not
violate CEQA.
On December 28, 2018, the Natural Resources Agency announced the OAL approved the
amendments to the CEQA Guidelines for implementing the CEQA. The CEQA Amendments
provide guidance to public agencies regarding the analysis and mitigation of the effects of GHG
emissions in CEQA documents. The CEQA Amendments fit within the existing CEQA framework
by amending existing CEQA Guidelines to reference climate change.
Section 15064.3 was added the CEQA Guidelines and states that in determining the significance
of a project’s GHG emissions, the lead agency should focus its analysis on the reasonably
foreseeable incremental contribution of the project’s emissions to the effects of climate change.
A project’s incremental contribution may be cumulatively considerable even if it appears
relatively small compared to statewide, national or global emissions. The agency’s analysis should
consider a timeframe that is appropriate for the project. The agency’s analysis also must
reasonably reflect evolving scientific knowledge and state regulatory schemes. Additionally, a
lead agency may use a model or methodology to estimate GHG emissions resulting from a
project. The lead agency has discretion to select the model or methodology it considers most
appropriate to enable decision makers to intelligently take into account the project’s incremental
contribution to climate change. The lead agency must support its selection of a model or
methodology with substantial evidence. The lead agency should explain the limitations of the
particular model or methodology selected for use (43).
2.7.4 REGIONAL
The project is within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the
SCAQMD.
SCAQMD
SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SCAB. The
SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a
lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as
a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the
project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This
expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the
development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions.
In 2008, SCAQMD formed a Working Group to identify GHG emissions thresholds for land use
projects that could be used by local lead agencies in the SCAB. The Working Group developed
several different options that are contained in the SCAQMD Draft Guidance Document – Interim
CEQA GHG Significance Threshold, that could be applied by lead agencies. The working group
has not provided additional guidance since release of the interim guidance in 2008. The SCAQMD
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
37
Board has not approved the thresholds; however, the Guidance Document provides substantial
evidence supporting the approaches to significance of GHG emissions that can be considered by
the lead agency in adopting its own threshold. The current interim thresholds consist of the
following tiered approach:
• Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable
exemption under CEQA.
• Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan.
If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it does not have
significant GHG emissions.
• Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be
consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are
averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s
emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than
significant:
o Residential and Commercial land use: 3,000 MTCO2e/yr
o Industrial land use: 10,000 MTCO2e/yr
o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e/yr; commercial: 1,400
MTCO2e/yr; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e/yr
• Tier 4 has the following options:
o Option 1: Reduce Business-as-Usual (BAU) emissions by a certain percentage; this
percentage is currently undefined.
o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures
o Option 3: 2020 target for service populations, which includes residents and
employees: 4.8 MTCO2e per service population per year for projects and 6.6
MTCO2e per service population per year for plans;
o Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e per service population per year for projects and
4.1 MTCO2e per service population per year for plans
• Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.
The SCAQMD’s interim thresholds used the Executive Order S-3-05-year 2050 goal as the basis
for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to
worldwide efforts to cap CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate.
SCAQMD only has authority over GHG emissions from development projects that include air
quality permits. At this time, it is unknown if the project would include stationary sources of
emissions subject to SCAQMD permits. Notwithstanding, if the Project requires a stationary
permit, it would be subject to the applicable SCAQMD regulations.
SCAQMD Regulation XXVII, adopted in 2009 includes the following rules:
• Rule 2700 defines terms and post GWPs.
• Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, establishes a voluntary program to
encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified GHG emission reductions
in the SCAQMD.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
38
• Rule 2702, GHG Reduction Program created a program to produce GHG emission reductions
within the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to
requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties.
2.8 DISCUSSION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
The City of Orange has not established local CEQA significance thresholds for GHG emissions, as
described in Section 15064.7 of the CEQA Guidelines. According to the Final Statement of Reasons
(FSOR) for Regulatory Action, the revised Section 15064.7 gives lead agencies the discretion to
determine their methodology for quantifying GHG emissions (44). A screening threshold of 3,000
MTCO2e/yr to determine if additional analysis is required is an acceptable approach for small
projects and multi-use projects. This approach is a widely accepted screening threshold used by
the County of Orange and numerous cities in the SCAB and is based on the SCAQMD staff’s
proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary source emissions for non-industrial projects, as
described in the SCAQMD’s Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources,
Rules and Plans (45). The Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules
and Plans identifies a screening threshold to determine whether additional analysis is required
(46). As noted by the SCAQMD:
“…the…screening level for stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate
of 90% for all new or modified projects...the policy objective of [SCAQMD’s]
recommended interim GHG significance threshold proposal is to achieve an
emission capture rate of 90% of all new or modified stationary source projects. A
GHG significance threshold based on a 90% emission capture rate may be more
appropriate to address the long-term adverse impacts associated with global
climate change because most projects will be required to implement GHG
reduction measures. Further, a 90% emission capture rate sets the emission
threshold low enough to capture a substantial fraction of future stationary source
projects that will be constructed to accommodate future statewide population and
economic growth, while setting the emission threshold high enough to exclude
small projects that will in aggregate contribute a relatively small fraction of the
cumulative statewide GHG emissions. This assertion is based on the fact that
[SCAQMD] staff estimates that these GHG emissions would account for slightly less
than 1% of future 2050 statewide GHG emissions target (85 [MMTCO2e/yr]). In
addition, these small projects may be subject to future applicable GHG control
regulations that would further reduce their overall future contribution to the
statewide GHG inventory. Finally, these small sources are already subject to [Best
Available Control Technology] (BACT) for criteria pollutants and are more likely to
be single-permit facilities, so they are more likely to have few opportunities readily
available to reduce GHG emissions from other parts of their facility.” (46)
Thus, and based on guidance from the SCAQMD, if a non-industrial project would emit GHGs less
than 3,000 MTCO2e/yr, the project is not considered a substantial GHG emitter and the GHG
impact is less than significant, requiring no additional analysis and no mitigation. On the other
hand, if a non-industrial project would emit GHGs in excess of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr, then the project
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
39
could be considered a substantial GHG emitter, requiring additional analysis and potential
mitigation.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
40
This page intentionally left blank
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
41
3 PROJECT GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Project has been evaluated to determine if it will result in a significant GHG impact. The
significance of these potential impacts is described in the following section.
3.2 STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The criteria used to determine the significance of potential Project-related GHG impacts are
taken from the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq.). Based on
these thresholds, a project would result in a significant impact related to GHG if it would (47):
• Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on
the environment?
• Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of GHGs?
3.3 CALIFORNIA EMISSIONS ESTIMATOR MODEL (CALEEMOD) EMPLOYED TO ANALYZE GHGS
On October 17, 2017, the SCAQMD, in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control
Officers Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the
CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and
operational-source criteria pollutant and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources; and
quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved from mitigation measures (48).
Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used for this Project to determine GHG
emissions. Output from the model runs for construction and operational activity are provided in
Appendix 3.1. CalEEMod includes GHG emissions from the following source categories:
construction, area, energy, mobile, waste, water.
3.3.1 EMISSION FACTORS MODEL (EMFAC)
On August 19, 2019, the EPA approved the 2017 version of the EMFAC web database for use in
State Implementation Plan and transportation conformity analyses. EMFAC2017 is a
mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in
California and is commonly used by the CARB to project changes in future emissions from on -
road mobile sources (49). This GHGA utilizes annual EMFAC2017 emission factors in order to
derive vehicle emissions associated with Project operational activities.
Because the EMFAC2017 emission rates are associated with vehicle fuel types while CalEEMod
vehicle emission factors are aggregated to include all fuel types for each individual vehicle c lass,
the EMFAC2017 emission rates for different fuel types of a vehicle class are averaged by activity
or by population and activity to derive CalEEMod emission factors. The equations applied to
obtain CalEEMod vehicle emission factors for each emission type are detailed in CalEEMod User’s
Guide Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod (50).
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
42
3.4 LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS NOT REQUIRED
A full life‐cycle analysis (LCA) for construction and operational activity is not included in this
analysis due to the lack of consensus guidance on LCA methodology at this time (51). Life‐cycle
analysis (i.e., assessing economy‐wide GHG emissions from the processes in manufacturing and
transporting all raw materials used in the project development, infrastructure and on-going
operations) depends on emission factors or econometric factors that are not well established for
all processes. At this time, an LCA would be extremely speculative and thus has not been
prepared. Additionally, the SCAQMD recommends analyzing direct and indirect project GHG
emissions generated within California and not life-cycle emissions because the life-cycle effects
from a project could occur outside of California, might not be very well understood or
documented, and would be challenging to mitigate (52). Additionally, the science to calculate
life cycle emissions is not yet established or well defined; therefore, SCAQMD has not
recommended, and is not requiring, life-cycle emissions analysis.
3.5 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Project construction actvities would generate CO2 and CH4 emissions The report Orange
Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Air Quality Impact Analysis Report (AQIA) (Urban Crossroads,
Inc.) contains detailed information regarding Project construction activities (53). As discussed in
the AQIA, Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction activities:
3.5.1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
Construction activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO,
PM10, and PM2.5. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction
activities:
• Site Preparation
• Grading
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating
3.5.2 CONSTRUCTION DURATION
For purposes of analysis, it is anticipated that construction activities will commence in October
2020 and last through September 2021. The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown
in Table 3-1, represents a “worst-case” analysis scenario should construction occur any time after
the respective dates since emission factors for construction decrease as time passes and the
analysis year increases due to emission regulations becoming more stringent.4 The duration of
construction activity and associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the
4 As shown in the CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2, Section 4.3 “Off-road Equipment” as the analysis year increases, emission factors
for the same equipment pieces decrease due to the natural turnover of older equipment being replaced by newer less polluting equipment
and new regulatory requirements.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
43
expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines (54). The duration of construction
activity was based on CalEEMod defaults.
TABLE 3-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Phase Name Start Date End Date Days
Site Preparation 10/05/2020 10/07/2020 3
Grading 10/08/2020 10/15/2020 6
Building Construction 10/16/2020 08/19/2021 220
Grading 08/20/2021 09/02/2021 10
Architectural Coating 09/03/2021 09/16/2021 10
3.5.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Site specific construction fleet may vary due to specific project needs at the time of construction.
The associated construction equipment was generally based on CalEEMod defaults. A detailed
summary of construction equipment assumptions by phase is provided at Table 3-2. Please refer
to specific detailed modeling inputs/outputs contained in Appendix 3.1 of this GHGA.
TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Phase Name Equipment Type Quantity Hours Per Day
Site Preparation
Graders 1 8
Scrapers 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Grading
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8
Building Construction
Cranes 1 8
Forklifts 2 8
Generator Sets 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Welders 3 8
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8
Pavers 1 8
Paving Equipment 1 8
Rollers 2 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
44
3.5.4 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY
For construction phase Project emissions, GHGs are quantified and amortized over the life of the
Project. To amortize the emissions over the life of the Project, the SCAQMD recommends
calculating the total GHG emissions for the construction activities, dividing it by a 30-year project
life then adding that number to the annual operational phase GHG emissions (55). As such,
construction emissions were amortized over a 30-year period and added to the annual
operational phase GHG emissions. The amortized construction emissions are presented in Table
3-3.
TABLE 3-3: AMORTIZED ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Year
Emissions (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O Total CO2e5
2020 98.24 0.02 0.00 98.67
2021 262.44 0.04 0.00 263.50
Total Construction Emissions 360.69 0.06 0.00 362.16
Amortized Construction Emissions (MTCO2e) 12.02 0.00 0.00 12.07
3.6 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Operational activities associated with the proposed Project will result in emissions of CO2, CH4,
and N2O from the following primary sources:
• Area Source Emissions
• Energy Source Emissions
• Mobile Source Emissions
• Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution
• Solid Waste
3.6.1 AREA SOURCE EMISSIONS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
Landscape maintenance equipment would generate emissions from fuel combustion and
evaporation of unburned fuel. Equipment in this category would include lawnmowers,
shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the
landscaping of the Project. The emissions associated with landscape maintenance equipment
were calculated based on assumptions provided in CalEEMod.
5 CalEEMod reports the most common GHGs emitted which include CO2, CH4, and N2O. These GHGs are then converted into the
CO2e by multiplying the individual GHG by the GWP.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
45
3.6.2 ENERGY SOURCE EMISSIONS
COMBUSTION EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NATURAL GAS AND ELECTRICITY
GHGs are emitted from buildings as a result of activities for which electricity and natural gas are
typically used as energy sources. Combustion of any type of fuel emits CO2 and other GHGs
directly into the atmosphere; these emissions are considered direct emissions associated with a
building; the building energy use emissions do not include street lighting6. GHGs are also emitted
during the generation of electricity from fossil fuels; these emissions are considered to be indirect
emissions. Unless otherwise noted, CalEEMod default parameters were used.
TITLE 24 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings was first
adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.
The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new
energy efficient technologies and methods. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity. The
2019 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and became effective on January 1, 2020. The
CEC anticipates that residential buildings will use approximately 53% less energy and
nonresidential buildings will use approximately 30% less energy (41). The CalEEMod defaults for
Title 24 – Electricity, Title 24 – Natural Gas, and Lighting Energy were reduced by 53% for
residential uses in order to reflect consistency with the 2019 Title 24 standard.
3.6.3 MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS
The Project related GHG impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project.
Trip characteristics available from the Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Trip Generation
Evaluation report were utilized in this analysis (56).
3.6.4 WATER SUPPLY, TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTION
Indirect GHG emissions result from the production of electricity used to convey, treat and
distribute water and wastewater. The amount of electricity required to convey, treat and
distribute water depends on the volume of water as well as the sources of th e water. CalEEMod
default parameters were used to estimate GHG emissions associated with water supply,
treatment and distribution for the Project scenario.
3.6.5 SOLID WASTE
Residential land uses will result in the generation and disposal of solid waste. A large percentage
of this waste will be diverted from landfills by a variety of means, such as reducing the amount
of waste generated, recycling, and/or composting. The remainder of the waste not diverted will
be disposed of at a landfill. GHG emissions from landfills are associated with the anaerobic
6 The CalEEMod emissions inventory model does not include indirect emission related to street lighting. Indirect emissions
related to street lighting are expected to be negligible and cannot be accurately quantified at this time as there is
insufficient information as to the number and type of street lighting that would occur.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
46
breakdown of material. GHG emissions associated with the disposal of solid waste associated
with the proposed Project were calculated by CalEEMod using default parameters.
3.7 EMISSIONS SUMMARY
The annual GHG emissions associated with the operation of the proposed Project are estimated
to be 576.63 MTCO2e/yr as summarized in Table 3-4.
TABLE 3-4: PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS
Emission Source
Emissions (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O Total CO2e
Annual construction-related emissions
amortized over 30 years 12.02 0.00 0.00 12.07
Area Source 15.93 1.30E-03 2.70E-04 16.05
Energy Source 100.75 3.55E-03 1.13E-03 101.17
Mobile Source 400.94 0.03 0.00 401.63
Waste 5.79 0.34 0.00 14.34
Water Usage 27.06 0.13 3.33E-03 31.36
Total CO2e (All Sources) 576.63
3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GHG Impact #1: The Project would not generate direct or indirect GHG emissions that would
result in a significant impact on the environment.
The City of Orange has not adopted its own numeric threshold of significance for determining
impacts with respect to GHG emissions. A screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr to determine
if additional analysis is required is an acceptable approach for small projects. This a pproach is a
widely accepted screening threshold used by numerous cities in the SCAB and is based on the
SCAQMD staff’s proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary source emissions for non-
industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD’s Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for
Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. The Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary
Sources, Rules and Plans identifies a screening threshold to determine whether additional
analysis is required (57).
The Project will result in approximately 175.00 MTCO2e/yr from construction, area, energy,
waste, and water usage. In addition, the Project has the potential to result in an additional 401.63
MTCO2e/yr from mobile sources if the assumption is made that all of the vehicle trips to and from
the Project are “new” trips resulting from the development of the Project. As shown on Table 3-
4, the Project has the potential to generate a total of approximately 576.63 MTCO2e/yr. As such,
the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended numeric threshold of 3,000
MTCO2e/yr. As such, project-related emissions would not have a potential significant direct or
indirect impact on GHG and climate change.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
47
GHG Impact #2: The Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of
an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG.
GHG emissions reduction plans, policies and regulations applicable to the Project include: SB 32
(including related 2017 Scoping Plan elements). Project consistency with SB 32 is evaluated in the
following discussion.
SB 32/2017 SCOPING PLAN CONSISTENCY
The 2017 Scoping Plan reflects the 2030 target of a 40% reduction below 1990 levels, set by
Executive Order B-30-15 and codified by SB 32. Table 3-5 summarizes the project’s consistency
with the 2017 Scoping Plan. As summarized, the project will not conflict with any of the
provisions of the 2017 Scoping Plan and in fact supports seven of the action categories.
TABLE 3-5: 2017 SCOPING PLAN CONSISTENCY SUMMARY7
Action Responsible Parties Consistency
Implement SB 350 by 2030
Increase the Renewables Portfolio
Standard to 50% of retail sales by 2030 and
ensure grid reliability.
CPUC,
CEC,
CARB
Consistent. The Project would use energy
from Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE
has committed to diversify its portfolio of
energy sources by increasing energy from
wind and solar sources. The Project
would not interfere with or obstruct SCE
energy source diversification efforts.
Establish annual targets for statewide
energy efficiency savings and demand
reduction that will achieve a cumulative
doubling of statewide energy efficiency
savings in electricity and natural gas end
uses by 2030.
Consistent. The Project would be designed
and constructed to implement the energy
efficiency measures and would include
several measures designed to reduce
energy consumption. The Project would
not interfere with or obstruct policies or
strategies to establish annual targets for
statewide energy efficiency savings and
demand reduction.
Reduce GHG emissions in the electricity
sector through the implementation of the
above measures and other actions as
modeled in Integrated Resource Planning
(IRP) to meet GHG emissions reductions
planning targets in the IRP process. Load-
serving entities and publicly- owned
utilities meet GHG emissions reductions
planning targets through a combination of
measures as described in IRPs.
Consistent. The proposed Project would
be designed and constructed to
implement the energy efficiency
measures, where applicable by including
several measures designed to reduce
energy consumption. The proposed
Project includes energy efficient field
lighting and fixtures that meet the current
Title 24 Standards throughout the Project
Site and would be a modern development
with energy efficient boilers, heaters, and
air conditioning systems.
Implement Mobile Source Strategy (Cleaner Technology and Fuels)
7 Measures can be found at the following link: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
48
Action Responsible Parties Consistency
At least 1.5 million zero emission and plug-
in hybrid light-duty EV by 2025.
CARB,
California State
Transportation
Agency (CalSTA),
Strategic Growth
Council (SGC),
California
Department of
Transportation
(Caltrans),
CEC,
OPR,
Local Agencies
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB zero emission and
plug-in hybrid light-duty EV 2025 targets.
At least 4.2 million zero emission and plug-
in hybrid light-duty EV by 2030.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB zero emission and
plug-in hybrid light-duty EV 2030 targets.
Further increase GHG stringency on all
light-duty vehicles beyond existing
Advanced Clean cars regulations.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB efforts to further
increase GHG stringency on all light-duty
vehicles beyond existing Advanced Clean
cars regulations.
Medium- and Heavy-Duty GHG Phase 2.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB efforts to
implement Medium- and Heavy-Duty GHG
Phase 2
Innovative Clean Transit: Transition to a
suite of to-be-determined innovative clean
transit options. Assumed 20% of new urban
buses purchased beginning in 2018 will be
zero emission buses with the penetration
of zero-emission technology ramped up to
100% of new sales in 2030. Also, new
natural gas buses, starting in 2018, and
diesel buses, starting in 2020, meet the
optional heavy-duty low-NOX standard.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB efforts improve
transit-source emissions.
Last Mile Delivery: New regulation that
would result in the use of low NOX or
cleaner engines and the deployment of
increasing numbers of zero-emission trucks
primarily for class 3-7 last mile delivery
trucks in California. This measure assumes
ZEVs comprise 2.5% of new Class 3–7 truck
sales in local fleets starting in 2020,
increasing to 10% in 2025 and remaining
flat through 2030.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB efforts to improve
last mile delivery emissions.
Further reduce vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) through continued implementation
of SB 375 and regional Sustainable
Communities Strategies; forthcoming
statewide implementation of SB 743; and
potential additional VMT reduction
strategies not specified in the Mobile
Source Strategy but included in the
document “Potential VMT Reduction
Strategies for Discussion.”
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of SB 375 and would therefore not conflict
with this measure.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
49
Action Responsible Parties Consistency
Increase stringency of SB 375 Sustainable
Communities Strategy (2035 targets).
CARB
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB efforts to Increase
stringency of SB 375 Sustainable
Communities Strategy (2035 targets).
Harmonize project performance with
emissions reductions and increase
competitiveness of transit and active
transportation modes (e.g. via guideline
documents, funding programs, project
selection, etc.).
CalSTA,
SGC,
OPR,
CARB,
Governor’s Office of
Business and
Economic
Development (GO-
Biz),
California
Infrastructure and
Economic
Development Bank
(IBank),
Department of
Finance (DOF),
California
Transportation
Commission (CTC),
Caltrans
Consistent. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with agency efforts to
harmonize transportation facility project
performance with emissions reductions
and increase competitiveness of transit
and active transportation modes.
By 2019, develop pricing policies to support
low-GHG transportation (e.g. low-emission
vehicle zones for heavy duty, road user,
parking pricing, transit discounts).
CalSTA,
Caltrans,
CTC,
OPR,
SGC,
CARB
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere with agency efforts
to develop pricing policies to support low-
GHG transportation.
Implement California Sustainable Freight Action Plan
Improve freight system efficiency.
CalSTA,
CalEPA,
CNRA,
CARB,
Caltrans,
CEC,
GO-Biz
Consistent. This measure would apply to
all trucks accessing the Project site, this
may include existing trucks or new trucks
that are part of the statewide goods
movement sector. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere with agency efforts
to Improve freight system efficiency.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
50
Action Responsible Parties Consistency
Deploy over 100,000 freight vehicles and
equipment capable of zero emission
operation and maximize both zero and
near-zero emission freight vehicles and
equipment powered by renewable energy
by 2030.
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere with agency efforts
to deploy over 100,000 freight vehicles
and equipment capable of zero emission
operation and maximize both zero and
near-zero emission freight vehicles and
equipment powered by renewable energy
by 2030.
Adopt a Low Carbon Fuel Standard with a
Carbon Intensity reduction of 18%.
CARB
Consistent. When adopted, this measure
would apply to all fuel purchased and
used by the Project in the state. The
Project would not obstruct or interfere
with agency efforts to adopt a Low Carbon
Fuel Standard with a Carbon Intensity
reduction of 18%.
Implement the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy (SLPS) by 2030
40% reduction in methane and
hydrofluorocarbon emissions below 2013
levels.
CARB,
CalRecycle,
CDFA,
SWRCB,
Local Air Districts
Consistent. The Project would be required
to comply with this measure and reduce
any Project-source SLPS emissions
accordingly. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
reduce SLPS emissions.
50% reduction in black carbon emissions
below 2013 levels.
By 2019, develop regulations and programs
to support organic waste landfill reduction
goals in the SLCP and SB 1383.
CARB,
California Recycling
Market
Development Act
(CalRecycle),
CDFA,
California State
Water Resource
Control Board
(SWRCB),
Local Air Districts
Consistent. The Project would implement
waste reduction and recycling measures
consistent with State and City
requirements. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
support organic waste landfill reduction
goals in the SLCP and SB 1383.
Implement the post-2020 Cap-and-Trade
Program with declining annual caps. CARB
Consistent. The Project would be required
to comply with any applicable Cap-and-
Trade Program provisions. The Project
would not obstruct or interfere agency
efforts to implement the post-2020 Cap-
and-Trade Program.
By 2018, develop Integrated Natural and Working Lands Implementation Plan to secure California’s land base
as a net carbon sink
CNRA,
Departments
Within
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
protect land from conversion through
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
51
Action Responsible Parties Consistency
Protect land from conversion through
conservation easements and other
incentives.
CDFA,
CalEPA,
CARB
conservation easements and other
incentives.
Increase the long-term resilience of carbon
storage in the land base and enhance
sequestration capacity
Consistent. The Project site is vacant
disturbed property and does not comprise
an area that would effectively provide for
carbon sequestration. The Project would
not obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
increase the long-term resilience of
carbon storage in the land base and
enhance sequestration capacity.
Utilize wood and agricultural products to
increase the amount of carbon stored in
the natural and built environments
Consistent. Where appropriate, Project
designs will incorporate wood or wood
products. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere agency efforts to encourage
use of wood and agricultural products to
increase the amount of carbon stored in
the natural and built environments.
Establish scenario projections to serve as
the foundation for the Implementation
Plan
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
establish scenario projections to serve as
the foundation for the Implementation
Plan.
Establish a carbon accounting framework
for natural and working lands as described
in SB 859 by 2018
CARB
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
establish a carbon accounting framework
for natural and working lands as described
in SB 859 by 2018.
Implement Forest Carbon Plan
CNRA,
California
Department of
Forestry and Fire
Protection
(CALFIRE),
CalEPA and
Departments Within
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
implement the Forest Carbon Plan.
Identify and expand funding and financing
mechanisms to support GHG reductions
across all sectors.
State Agencies &
Local Agencies
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
identify and expand funding and financing
mechanisms to support GHG reductions
across all sectors.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
52
As shown above, the Project would not conflict with any of the 2017 Scoping Plan elements as
any regulations adopted would apply directly or indirectly to the Project. Further, recent studies
show that the State’s existing and proposed regulatory framework will allow the State to reduce
its GHG emissions level to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 (36).
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
53
This page intentionally left blank
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
54
4 REFERENCES
1. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
2. Air Resources Board. Assembly Bill 32: Global Warming Solutions Act. [Online] 2006.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ab32/ab32.htm.
3. —. Sustainable Communities. [Online] 2008. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375.htm.
4. —. Clean Car Standards - Pavley, Assembly Bill 1493. [Online] September 24, 2009.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ccms/ccms.htm.
5. Building Standards Commission. California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of
Regulations). [Online] http://www.bsc.ca.gov/codes.aspx.
6. California Energy Commission. California Code of Regulations, TITLE 20, Division 2. [Online]
September 3, 2013. http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/title20/index.html.
7. Air Resources Board. Title 17 - California Code of Regulation. [Online] 2010.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/regs/regs-17.htm.
8. Department of Water Resources. Updated Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance AB 1881.
[Online] 2006. [Cited: November 13, 2013.]
http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/updatedOrd_history.cfm.
9. California Energy Commission. SB 1368 Emission Performance Standards. [Online] September 29,
2006. http://www.energy.ca.gov/emission_standards/.
10. —. Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). [Online] 2002. http://www.energy.ca.gov/portfolio/.
11. California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 32. [Online] September 8, 2016.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB32.
12. City of Orange. City of Orange General Plan. [Online] 2010.
https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/570/General-Plan---Land-Use-PDF.
13. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Greenhouse Gases - Water Vapor. NOAA
National Centers For Environmental Information. [Online] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-
references/faq/greenhouse-gases.php?section=watervapor.
14. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth
Assessment Report. International Panel on Climate Change. 4, 2007.
15. The Carbon Cycle and Climate Change. Bennington, Bret J. 1, s.l. : Brooks/Cole. ISBN 1 3: 978-0-495-
73855-8.
16. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Carbon Dioxide. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. [Online] https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0103.html.
17. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Greenhouse Gases - Methane. NOAA National
Centers for Environmental Information. [Online] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-
references/faq/greenhouse-gases.php?section=methane.
18. World Resources Institute. Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT). [Online] http://cait.wri.org.
19. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Greenhouse Gases - Chlorofluorocarbons. NOAA
National Centers For Environmental Information. [Online] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-
references/faq/greenhouse-gases.php?section=chlorofluorocarbons.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
55
20. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Regulation for Reducting Sulfur Hexafluoride
Emissions from Gas Insulated Switchgear. Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] May 7, 2014.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-02/documents/mehl-arb-presentation-2014-
wkshp.pdf.
21. World Resources Institute. Nitrogen Trifluoride Now Required in GHG Protocol Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventory. [Online] May 22, 2013. https://www.wri.org/blog/2013/05/nitrogen-
trifluoride-now-required-ghg-protocol-greenhouse-gas-emissions-inventories.
22. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nitrogen Trifluoride. PubChem Compound
Database. [Online] https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/24553 .
23. American Lung Association. Climate Change. [Online] http://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-
air/outdoor/climate-change/.
24. Barbara H. Allen-Diaz. Climate change affects us all. University of California Agriculture and Natural
Resources. [Online] April 1, 2009. http://calag.ucanr.edu/Archive/?article=ca.v063n02p51.
25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013 The Physical Science Basis -
Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. AR5 Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. [Online] September 2013.
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_all_final.pdf.
26. United Nations. GHG Profiles - Annex I. [Online] http://di.unfccc.int/ghg_profile_annex1.
27. —. GHG Profiles - Non-Annex I. [Online] http://di.unfccc.int/ghg_profile_non_annex1.
28. World Resources Institute. Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT). [Online] http://cait.wri.org.
29. Air Resources Board. 2019 GHG Inventory. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory 2000-2017
Edition. [Online] [Cited: September 19, 2019.] http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm.
30. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES). Outcomes of the U.N. Climate Change Conference.
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES). [Online] 2015.
http://www.c2es.org/international/negotiations/cop21-paris/summary.
31. Agency, United States Environmental Protection. Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings
for Greenhouse Gases under the Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. United States Environmental
Protection Agency. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/endangerment-and-cause-or-
contribute-findings-greenhouse-gases-under-section-202a-clean.
32. Federal Register. Mid-Term Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Year
2022-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles. [Online] April 13, 2018.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/04/13/2018-07364/mid-term-evaluation-of-
greenhouse-gas-emissions-standards-for-model-year-2022-2025-light-duty.
33. Environmental Protection Agency. The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule for Model Years
2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. [Online] August 24, 2018.
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0283-0756.
34. United States Environmental Protection Agency. SmartWay. [Online]
https://www.epa.gov/smartway/learn-about-smartway.
35. California Air Resources Board. California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan . [Online] 2017.
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017_es.pdf.
36. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. California's Policies Can Significantly Cut Greenhouse Gas
Emissions through 2030. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. [Online] January 22, 2015.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
56
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/01/22/californias-policies-can-significantly-cut-greenhouse-gas-
emissions-2030/.
37. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Modeling California policy impacts on
greenhouse gas emissions. [Online] 2015. https://eaei.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-7008e.pdf.
38. California Air Resources Board. Legal Disclaimer & User's Notice. [Online] April 2019.
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/capandtrade/ct_reg_unofficial.pdf.
39. —. Climate Change Scoping Plan. [Online] 2014.
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_scoping_plan.p
df.
40. —. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. [Online] December 2019. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/lcfs.htm.
41. The California Energy Commission. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards . California Energy
Commission. [Online] 2018.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Building_Stand
ards_FAQ.pdf.
42. Department of General Services. Building Standards Commission. CALGreen. [Online]
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Resources/Page-Content/Building-Standards-Commission-Resources-
List-Folder/CALGreen.
43. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2018 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2018.
44. California Natural Resources Agency. Final Statement for Reasons for Regulatory Action. [Online]
December 2009. http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf.
45. County of Riverside. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Screening Tables. San Bernardino : Atkins, 2012.
46. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for
Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. [Online]
http://www.aqmd.gov/hb/2008/December/081231a.htm.
47. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
48. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator
Model (CalEEMod). [Online] September 2016. www.caleemod.com.
49. California Department of Transportation. EMFAC Software. [Online]
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/air/pages/emfac.htm.
50. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Appendix A: Calculation Details for
CalEEMod. CalEEMod. [Online] October 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6.
51. California Natural Resources Agency. Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action,
Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Pursuant to SB97. [Online] December 2009.
52. Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance. South Coast Air Quality Managment District. 2008.
53. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Air Quality Impact Analysis
Report. 2020.
54. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
55. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold
Stakeholder Working Group #13. [Powerpoint] Diamond Bar : s.n., 2009.
56. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Trip Generation Evaluation. 2020.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
57
57. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for
Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. [Online]
http://www.aqmd.gov/hb/2008/December/081231a.htm.
58. Air Resources Board. 2019 GHG Inventory. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory 2000-2017
Edition. [Online] [Cited: September 19, 2019.] http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm.
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
58
This page intentionally left blank
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
59
5 CERTIFICATIONS
The contents of this GHG study report represent an accurate depiction of the GHG impacts
associated with the proposed Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Project. The
information contained in this GHG report is based on the best available data at the time of
preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 336-5987.
Haseeb Qureshi
Associate Principal
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.
260 E. Baker St., Suite 200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(949) 336-5987
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
EDUCATION
Master of Science in Environmental Studies
California State University, Fullerton • May 2010
Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California, Irvine • June 2006
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
AEP – Association of Environmental Planners
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Environmental Site Assessment – American Society for Testing and Materials • June 2013
Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011
Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008
Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – CARB • August 2007
AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006
Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
60
This page intentionally left blank
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
APPENDIX 3.1:
CALEEMOD EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Greenhouse Gas Analysis
13209-02 GHG Report
This page intentionally left blank
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Parking Lot 0.91 Acre 0.91 39,639.60 0
Apartments Mid Rise 62.00 Dwelling Unit 1.63 62,000.00 177
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2021Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Orange Corporate Yard
Orange County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 1 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total Project Area is 2.54 acres.
Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday.
Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday.
Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday.
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday.
Grading - For purposes of analysis, total acres graded per day is based on the equipment specific grading rates (CalEEMod Appendix A) and the equipment list.
Vehicle Trips - Trip Characteristics based on information provided in the Orange Corporate Yard Affordable Housing Trip Generation Evaluation by Urban
Crossroads, Inc.
Woodstoves - Rule 445
Energy Use - The Project will design building shells and building components to meet 2019 Title 24 Standards which expects 53% less energy for residential
use due to lighting upgrades.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Rule 403
Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017
Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017
Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 741.44 348.48
tblEnergyUse T24E 179.76 84.49
tblEnergyUse T24NG 5,911.46 2,778.39
tblFireplaces NumberGas 52.70 62.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 6.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 3.10 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 3.00 6.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 914.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 2 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.63 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.14
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 2.36 5.39
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.29 0.84
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.99 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4,116.44 1,057.87
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,683.99 1,517.44
tblVehicleEF HHD 12.64 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 20.04 5.92
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.96 3.93
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 8.4880e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1600e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 8.1210e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.6750e-003 8.7680e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0700e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1800e-004 6.0000e-006
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 3 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9160e-003 2.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.57 0.41
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.9000e-005 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.13 0.12
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.6300e-004 1.1210e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.10 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 9.6940e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.9200e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1800e-004 6.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.9160e-003 2.4300e-004
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.68 0.48
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.9000e-005 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.31 0.27
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.6300e-004 1.1210e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.11 5.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.59 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 0.14
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.72 5.25
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.30 0.84
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.80 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 4,359.67 1,057.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,683.99 1,517.44
tblVehicleEF HHD 12.64 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 20.68 5.78
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.75 3.72
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 4 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 7.8070e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1600e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 7.4700e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.6750e-003 8.7680e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0700e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.6900e-004 9.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0090e-003 2.4600e-004
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.54 0.43
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.2500e-004 6.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.13 0.12
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.4900e-004 1.1010e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.09 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 9.6850e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.8900e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.6900e-004 9.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0090e-003 2.4600e-004
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.64 0.50
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.2500e-004 6.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.31 0.27
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.4900e-004 1.1010e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.10 4.0000e-006
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 5 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.68 0.02
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.16 5.0360e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.25 5.42
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.29 0.46
tblVehicleEF HHD 4.03 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 3,780.54 1,027.42
tblVehicleEF HHD 1,683.99 1,421.63
tblVehicleEF HHD 12.64 0.09
tblVehicleEF HHD 19.16 5.92
tblVehicleEF HHD 3.89 3.78
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 8.9820e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1600e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 8.5930e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF HHD 8.6750e-003 8.5160e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.05
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0700e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1700e-004 6.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.3110e-003 2.7000e-004
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.61 0.39
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.0000e-005 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.13 0.11
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0200e-004 1.1940e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 6 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.10 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 9.7070e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.9300e-004 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 1.1700e-004 6.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.3110e-003 2.7000e-004
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.73 0.44
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.0000e-005 4.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.31 0.12
tblVehicleEF HHD 5.0200e-004 1.1940e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.11 5.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.3340e-003 2.6620e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 5.1760e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.58 0.68
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.10 2.11
tblVehicleEF LDA 263.86 265.52
tblVehicleEF LDA 58.33 54.23
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.9130e-003 1.6710e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.2790e-003 1.9230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7630e-003 1.5390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.0960e-003 1.7680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.21
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 7 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.6420e-003 2.6270e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 6.0200e-004 5.3700e-004
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.21
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.25
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.5760e-003 2.8320e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.6500e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.63 0.74
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.95 1.82
tblVehicleEF LDA 274.96 276.40
tblVehicleEF LDA 58.33 53.69
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.9130e-003 1.6710e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.2790e-003 1.9230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7630e-003 1.5390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.0960e-003 1.7680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.19
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.06 0.21
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.7540e-003 2.7340e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 8 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDA 5.9900e-004 5.3100e-004
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.19
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDA 4.2520e-003 2.6080e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 5.2830e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.56 0.65
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.13 2.18
tblVehicleEF LDA 259.76 261.50
tblVehicleEF LDA 58.33 54.34
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.9130e-003 1.6710e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.2790e-003 1.9230e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 1.7630e-003 1.5390e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.0960e-003 1.7680e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDA 2.6010e-003 2.5870e-003
tblVehicleEF LDA 6.0200e-004 5.3800e-004
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.05
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 9 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.05
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.26
tblVehicleEF LDT1 9.9920e-003 6.2080e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.19 1.26
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.74 2.32
tblVehicleEF LDT1 324.21 313.05
tblVehicleEF LDT1 71.81 65.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.11 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.5570e-003 2.3040e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.2780e-003 2.6430e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.3530e-003 2.1200e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.0150e-003 2.4300e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.25 0.19
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.16 0.66
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.19 0.36
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.2560e-003 3.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.6600e-004 6.4400e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.25 0.19
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.11
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 10 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.16 0.66
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.21 0.40
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 6.5570e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.28 1.36
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.36 2.00
tblVehicleEF LDT1 337.31 324.18
tblVehicleEF LDT1 71.81 64.47
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.5570e-003 2.3040e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.2780e-003 2.6430e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.3530e-003 2.1200e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.0150e-003 2.4300e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.17 0.18
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.26 0.20
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.15
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.61
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.17 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.3880e-003 3.2080e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.5900e-004 6.3800e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.17 0.18
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.26 0.20
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.15
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.61
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 11 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.19 0.36
tblVehicleEF LDT1 9.8200e-003 6.0950e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.16 1.22
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.82 2.39
tblVehicleEF LDT1 319.38 308.94
tblVehicleEF LDT1 71.81 65.25
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.11 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.5570e-003 2.3040e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.2780e-003 2.6430e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.3530e-003 2.1200e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.0150e-003 2.4300e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.29 0.22
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.78
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.19 0.37
tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.2070e-003 3.0570e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.6700e-004 6.4600e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.29 0.22
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.04
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.78
tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.21 0.41
tblVehicleEF LDT2 5.7840e-003 4.0560e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 12 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.6620e-003 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.74 0.91
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.41 2.69
tblVehicleEF LDT2 369.26 341.01
tblVehicleEF LDT2 81.71 71.31
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8090e-003 1.6350e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.1990e-003 1.8190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.6640e-003 1.5050e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.0220e-003 1.6730e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.39
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.32
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.6980e-003 3.3740e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 8.4100e-004 7.0600e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.12
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.39
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.35
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.1050e-003 4.3050e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 5.9960e-003 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.80 0.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 13 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.22 2.32
tblVehicleEF LDT2 384.42 352.00
tblVehicleEF LDT2 81.71 70.61
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.06
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8090e-003 1.6350e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.1990e-003 1.8190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.6640e-003 1.5050e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.0220e-003 1.6730e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.36
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.08 0.29
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.8500e-003 3.4820e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 8.3800e-004 6.9900e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.11
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.10
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.36
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.31
tblVehicleEF LDT2 5.6750e-003 3.9780e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.7990e-003 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.72 0.88
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.45 2.77
tblVehicleEF LDT2 363.66 336.95
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 14 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LDT2 81.71 71.46
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8090e-003 1.6350e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.1990e-003 1.8190e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.6640e-003 1.5050e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.0220e-003 1.6730e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.46
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.33
tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.6420e-003 3.3340e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT2 8.4100e-004 7.0700e-004
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.07
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.13
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.46
tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.36
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.7990e-003 5.8180e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 5.0100e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.78 0.57
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.55 1.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.03 9.05
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 15 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD1 603.73 667.72
tblVehicleEF LHD1 33.13 12.41
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.27 0.81
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6000e-004 7.5600e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 9.6460e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 7.2150e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1700e-004 2.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.2300e-004 7.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5110e-003 2.4120e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.9290e-003 6.8770e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.4300e-004 2.3500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.8210e-003 2.2570e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.07
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.7870e-003 1.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.28 0.47
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.27 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1000e-005 8.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.9280e-003 6.5210e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.7900e-004 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.8210e-003 2.2570e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.07
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.7870e-003 1.4220e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.06
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 16 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.28 0.47
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.29 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.7990e-003 5.8300e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 5.0980e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.79 0.58
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.44 1.04
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.03 9.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 603.73 667.74
tblVehicleEF LHD1 33.13 12.33
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.19 0.76
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6000e-004 7.5600e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 9.6460e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 7.2150e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1700e-004 2.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.2300e-004 7.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5110e-003 2.4120e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.9290e-003 6.8770e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.4300e-004 2.3500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.9390e-003 3.1600e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.07
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.4300e-003 1.9450e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.27 0.45
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 17 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.26 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1000e-005 8.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.9280e-003 6.5210e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.7700e-004 1.2200e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.9390e-003 3.1600e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.07
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.4300e-003 1.9450e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.27 0.45
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.28 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.7990e-003 5.8160e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 4.9860e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.19
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.77 0.57
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.56 1.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.03 9.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 603.73 667.72
tblVehicleEF LHD1 33.13 12.42
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.24 0.80
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6000e-004 7.5600e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 9.6460e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 7.2150e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1700e-004 2.5500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.2300e-004 7.2300e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 18 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5110e-003 2.4120e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.9290e-003 6.8770e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.4300e-004 2.3500e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.9400e-003 2.3610e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.11 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.8110e-003 1.4460e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.30 0.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.27 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.1000e-005 8.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.9280e-003 6.5210e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.8000e-004 1.2300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.9400e-003 2.3610e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.11 0.08
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.8110e-003 1.4460e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.30 0.50
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.29 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2890e-003 4.2530e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2710e-003 3.6630e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.4470e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.13 0.16
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.36 0.41
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.38 0.76
tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.67 13.61
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 19 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD2 619.08 679.10
tblVehicleEF LHD2 28.46 10.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.87 0.94
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1890e-003 1.1970e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.7400e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.6100e-004 1.4900e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1370e-003 1.1460e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6460e-003 2.6120e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.3060e-003 9.6640e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2300e-004 1.3700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1610e-003 1.4570e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.7900e-004 9.3400e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.30
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.13 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3400e-004 1.3100e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.0340e-003 6.5780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.1000e-004 9.9000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1610e-003 1.4570e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.7900e-004 9.3400e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.06
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 20 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.30
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.14 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2890e-003 4.2620e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.3220e-003 3.7010e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.1410e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.13 0.16
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.37 0.41
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.32 0.73
tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.67 13.61
tblVehicleEF LHD2 619.08 679.11
tblVehicleEF LHD2 28.46 9.96
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.82 0.88
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1890e-003 1.1970e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.7400e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.6100e-004 1.4900e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1370e-003 1.1460e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6460e-003 2.6120e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.3060e-003 9.6640e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2300e-004 1.3700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6270e-003 2.0410e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.0610e-003 1.2770e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.29
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 21 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3400e-004 1.3100e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.0340e-003 6.5780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.0900e-004 9.9000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.6270e-003 2.0410e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.0610e-003 1.2770e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.08 0.29
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.13 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2890e-003 4.2510e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2570e-003 3.6530e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.5090e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.13 0.16
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.36 0.41
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.38 0.76
tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.67 13.61
tblVehicleEF LHD2 619.08 679.10
tblVehicleEF LHD2 28.46 10.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.09
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.85 0.92
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1890e-003 1.1970e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.7400e-003 0.01
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.6100e-004 1.4900e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1370e-003 1.1460e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 22 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6460e-003 2.6120e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.3060e-003 9.6640e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.2300e-004 1.3700e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1810e-003 1.5020e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.7800e-004 9.3300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.05
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.33
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.13 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3400e-004 1.3100e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.0340e-003 6.5780e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.1000e-004 9.9000e-005
tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1810e-003 1.5020e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.03
tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.7800e-004 9.3300e-004
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.06
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.33
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.14 0.06
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.48 0.35
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.15 0.24
tblVehicleEF MCY 18.61 18.90
tblVehicleEF MCY 9.56 8.43
tblVehicleEF MCY 177.57 214.49
tblVehicleEF MCY 45.30 60.11
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.12 1.12
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 23 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1370e-003 2.1160e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.9240e-003 3.2680e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.9990e-003 1.9800e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.7000e-003 3.0810e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.13 1.16
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.69 0.72
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.71 0.72
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.38 2.40
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.65 2.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.05 1.82
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1510e-003 2.1230e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.7000e-004 5.9500e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.13 1.16
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.69 0.72
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.71 0.72
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.95 2.97
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.65 2.07
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.24 1.98
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.47 0.35
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.14 0.21
tblVehicleEF MCY 17.91 18.17
tblVehicleEF MCY 8.81 7.74
tblVehicleEF MCY 177.57 213.12
tblVehicleEF MCY 45.30 58.36
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.98 0.98
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1370e-003 2.1160e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.9240e-003 3.2680e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 24 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.9990e-003 1.9800e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.7000e-003 3.0810e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.71 1.74
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.73 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.12 1.14
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.33 2.34
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.61 1.94
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.85 1.62
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1380e-003 2.1090e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.5100e-004 5.7700e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.71 1.74
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.73 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.12 1.14
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.89 2.90
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.61 1.94
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.01 1.77
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.48 0.35
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.15 0.24
tblVehicleEF MCY 18.72 19.01
tblVehicleEF MCY 9.67 8.55
tblVehicleEF MCY 177.57 214.70
tblVehicleEF MCY 45.30 60.42
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.09 1.09
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1370e-003 2.1160e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.9240e-003 3.2680e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.9990e-003 1.9800e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 3.7000e-003 3.0810e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 25 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.26 1.28
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.89 0.92
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.75 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.39 2.41
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.75 2.38
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.09 1.86
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1530e-003 2.1250e-003
tblVehicleEF MCY 6.7300e-004 5.9800e-004
tblVehicleEF MCY 1.26 1.28
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.89 0.92
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.75 0.76
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.97 2.98
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.75 2.38
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.28 2.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 5.6010e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 0.08
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.26 1.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.62 3.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 500.02 420.73
tblVehicleEF MDV 108.15 86.72
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.14 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.9190e-003 1.7840e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.3090e-003 1.9820e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.7700e-003 1.6450e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.1250e-003 1.8230e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.16 0.14
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 26 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.09
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.42
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.41
tblVehicleEF MDV 5.0080e-003 4.1600e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.1270e-003 8.5800e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.08
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.16 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.09
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.42
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.45
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 5.9080e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 0.08
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.36 1.20
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.27 2.68
tblVehicleEF MDV 519.96 432.28
tblVehicleEF MDV 108.15 85.89
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.12 0.09
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.9190e-003 1.7840e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.3090e-003 1.9820e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.7700e-003 1.6450e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.1250e-003 1.8230e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.16 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 27 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.39
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.18 0.37
tblVehicleEF MDV 5.2090e-003 4.2740e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.1210e-003 8.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.16 0.14
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.12
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.04
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.39
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.40
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 5.5000e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.09
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.23 1.08
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.69 3.21
tblVehicleEF MDV 492.66 416.47
tblVehicleEF MDV 108.15 86.90
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.13 0.10
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.9190e-003 1.7840e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.3090e-003 1.9820e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.7700e-003 1.6450e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 2.1250e-003 1.8230e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.08
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.17 0.15
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.09
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.49
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.42
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 28 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MDV 4.9340e-003 4.1170e-003
tblVehicleEF MDV 1.1290e-003 8.6000e-004
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.08
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.17 0.15
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.09
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.04 0.03
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.49
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.46
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 3.3600e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 2.15 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 5.50 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,108.90 981.53
tblVehicleEF MH 57.43 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1.43 3.91
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.10
tblVehicleEF MH 1.0490e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 3.2420e-003 4.0000e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 9.6500e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.95 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.41 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.07
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.32 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 29 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 9.2790e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 6.7000e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.95 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.41 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.35 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 3.3600e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 2.21 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 5.21 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,108.90 981.53
tblVehicleEF MH 57.43 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1.33 3.70
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.10
tblVehicleEF MH 1.0490e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 3.2420e-003 4.0000e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 9.6500e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.56 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.07
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.31 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 30 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 9.2790e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 6.6500e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1.28 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.56 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.34 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 3.3600e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 2.13 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 5.54 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1,108.90 981.53
tblVehicleEF MH 57.43 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1.40 3.84
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.10
tblVehicleEF MH 1.0490e-003 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 3.2420e-003 4.0000e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.09
tblVehicleEF MH 9.6500e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.43 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.07
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.32 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 31 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 9.2790e-003
tblVehicleEF MH 6.7100e-004 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 1.05 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.43 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.08
tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.00
tblVehicleEF MH 0.35 0.00
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 4.9130e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.2090e-003 5.6110e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.36 0.39
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.33 0.51
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.12 1.31
tblVehicleEF MHD 141.40 56.75
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,144.82 1,086.34
tblVehicleEF MHD 60.68 12.86
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.54 0.43
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.18 1.96
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.3000e-004 1.4510e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.5730e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.9300e-004 1.1900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.2000e-004 1.3880e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.3290e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.2900e-004 1.0900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1360e-003 4.8700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.02
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 32 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.3800e-004 3.2900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.09
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.10
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.38 0.06
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3610e-003 5.4000e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.1400e-004 1.2700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1360e-003 4.8700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.3800e-004 3.2900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.11
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.10
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.41 0.07
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 4.6520e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.2610e-003 5.6470e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.26 0.31
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.34 0.51
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.83 1.25
tblVehicleEF MHD 149.77 57.73
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,144.82 1,086.35
tblVehicleEF MHD 60.68 12.75
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.56 0.43
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.12 1.85
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.9400e-004 1.2250e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 33 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.5730e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.9300e-004 1.1900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.8500e-004 1.1720e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.3290e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.2900e-004 1.0900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.6040e-003 6.8900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0240e-003 4.5600e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.09
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.09
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.36 0.06
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.4400e-003 5.5000e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.0900e-004 1.2600e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.6040e-003 6.8900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0240e-003 4.5600e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.11
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.09
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.40 0.06
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 5.2900e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.1930e-003 5.5990e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.50 0.50
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.33 0.51
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 34 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MHD 6.17 1.32
tblVehicleEF MHD 129.83 55.39
tblVehicleEF MHD 1,144.82 1,086.34
tblVehicleEF MHD 60.68 12.88
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.52 0.42
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.16 1.92
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.8000e-004 1.7620e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.5730e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.9300e-004 1.1900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 2.6800e-004 1.6860e-003
tblVehicleEF MHD 5.3290e-003 0.05
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.2900e-004 1.0900e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1820e-003 4.9800e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.5300e-004 3.3100e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.09
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.11
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.38 0.06
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2520e-003 5.2700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.1500e-004 1.2700e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1820e-003 4.9800e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.03
tblVehicleEF MHD 7.5300e-004 3.3100e-004
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.11
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 35 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.11
tblVehicleEF MHD 0.42 0.07
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 9.0600e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.4360e-003 9.3580e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.28 0.55
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.58 1.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.60 2.44
tblVehicleEF OBUS 84.68 84.33
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,226.51 1,422.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 69.78 20.28
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.42 0.52
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.44 1.85
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4500e-004 2.0430e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.3790e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.3400e-004 1.9500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.3900e-004 1.9550e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.0420e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6700e-004 1.7900e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4250e-003 1.8490e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6500e-004 9.7800e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.23
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.35 0.12
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.2000e-004 8.0300e-004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 36 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.9600e-004 2.0100e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4250e-003 1.8490e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6500e-004 9.7800e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.12
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.23
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.39 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 9.0790e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.5800e-003 9.4940e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.26 0.53
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.58 1.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.31 2.31
tblVehicleEF OBUS 88.70 84.93
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,226.51 1,422.12
tblVehicleEF OBUS 69.78 20.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.43 0.52
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.35 1.74
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.2200e-004 1.7270e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.3790e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.3400e-004 1.9500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1700e-004 1.6520e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.0420e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6700e-004 1.7900e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.9610e-003 2.5310e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 37 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.0530e-003 1.3340e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.22
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.34 0.11
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.5900e-004 8.0900e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.9100e-004 1.9900e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.9610e-003 2.5310e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.0530e-003 1.3340e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.12
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.22
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.37 0.13
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 9.0540e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.3930e-003 9.3190e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.29 0.59
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.57 1.00
tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.64 2.46
tblVehicleEF OBUS 79.14 83.50
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,226.51 1,422.09
tblVehicleEF OBUS 69.78 20.31
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.40 0.52
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.41 1.81
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 38 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.7600e-004 2.4810e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.3790e-003 0.04
tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.3400e-004 1.9500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.6900e-004 2.3730e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.0420e-003 0.03
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6700e-004 1.7900e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4580e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.06
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6200e-004 9.8200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.06 0.10
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.24
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.36 0.12
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6700e-004 7.9500e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.9700e-004 2.0100e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4580e-003 1.9070e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.08
tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.6200e-004 9.8200e-004
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.07 0.12
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.24
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.39 0.13
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.87 0.07
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.09 7.1320e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.16 2.80
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 39 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.19 1.03
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.61 1.02
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,131.05 356.18
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,090.69 1,128.82
tblVehicleEF SBUS 54.18 5.79
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.79 3.82
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.65 6.33
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 6.3360e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.3500e-004 6.5000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 6.0620e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6810e-003 2.6580e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.6000e-004 6.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.6480e-003 1.1350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.98 0.34
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.9360e-003 5.7500e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.07
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.51 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.4000e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.0800e-004 5.7000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.6480e-003 1.1350e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 40 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.42 0.48
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.9360e-003 5.7500e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.17
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.07
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.56 0.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.87 0.07
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.08 6.4080e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.04 2.75
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.21 1.05
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.94 0.84
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,182.37 367.48
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,090.69 1,128.85
tblVehicleEF SBUS 54.18 5.50
tblVehicleEF SBUS 10.10 3.93
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.39 5.98
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.9100e-003 5.3460e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.3500e-004 6.5000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.5240e-003 5.1150e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6810e-003 2.6580e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.6000e-004 6.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.9860e-003 1.5480e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.98 0.34
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 41 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6570e-003 7.8500e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.06
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.46 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.5060e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 6.8100e-004 5.4000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.9860e-003 1.5480e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.42 0.48
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6570e-003 7.8500e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.17
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.06
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.50 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.87 0.07
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.09 7.2360e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.33 2.86
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.18 1.03
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.77 1.03
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,060.18 340.58
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,090.69 1,128.81
tblVehicleEF SBUS 54.18 5.82
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.36 3.67
tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.57 6.22
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 7.7020e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 42 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.3500e-004 6.5000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 7.3690e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6810e-003 2.6580e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.6000e-004 6.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.6990e-003 1.1730e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.99 0.34
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.8970e-003 5.6800e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.13 0.14
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.51 0.04
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.2520e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.1100e-004 5.8000e-005
tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.6990e-003 1.1730e-003
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 0.01
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.42 0.48
tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.8970e-003 5.6800e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.16 0.17
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.09
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.56 0.05
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.93 7.28
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.07 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.96 27.90
tblVehicleEF UBUS 13.19 1.81
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 43 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,828.32 2,044.63
tblVehicleEF UBUS 133.38 22.76
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.82 4.04
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.53 0.08
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 5.2920e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1810e-003 4.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.23 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0000e-003 7.5850e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 5.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.0860e-003 3.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.1570e-003 2.6630e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.6270e-003 1.8540e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.53 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.21
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.96 0.15
tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.6430e-003 4.3420e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.5700e-003 2.2500e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.1570e-003 2.6630e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.6270e-003 1.8540e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.52 7.44
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.21
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.05 0.16
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.94 7.28
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.07 0.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 44 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.02 27.90
tblVehicleEF UBUS 11.63 1.61
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,828.32 2,044.63
tblVehicleEF UBUS 133.38 22.40
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.53 4.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.53 0.08
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 5.2920e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1810e-003 4.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.23 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0000e-003 7.5850e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 5.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.0860e-003 3.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.2530e-003 3.6380e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.8310e-003 2.4730e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.53 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.19
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.89 0.14
tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.6450e-003 4.3420e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.5430e-003 2.2200e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.2530e-003 3.6380e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.8310e-003 2.4730e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.53 7.44
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.03 0.19
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.98 0.15
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 45 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.93 7.28
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.07 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.95 27.90
tblVehicleEF UBUS 13.46 1.85
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,828.32 2,044.63
tblVehicleEF UBUS 133.38 22.82
tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.73 4.04
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.53 0.08
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 5.2920e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1810e-003 4.0000e-005
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.23 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0000e-003 7.5850e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 5.0590e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.0860e-003 3.6000e-005
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.9610e-003 2.5390e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.12 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8300e-003 1.7550e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.52 0.11
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.26
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.98 0.15
tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.6430e-003 4.3420e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.5750e-003 2.2600e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 6.9610e-003 2.5390e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.12 0.03
tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.8300e-003 1.7550e-003
tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.52 7.44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 46 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 0.26
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.07 0.16
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 4.91
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.09
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.45
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 3.10 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 3.10 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 47 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.0821 0.6575 0.5500 1.1300e-
003
0.0458 0.0323 0.0781 0.0165 0.0307 0.0472 0.0000 98.2431 98.2431 0.0169 0.0000 98.6666
2021 0.4046 1.5640 1.5202 3.0500e-
003
0.0635 0.0756 0.1391 0.0170 0.0722 0.0892 0.0000 262.4428 262.4428 0.0421 0.0000 263.4954
Maximum 0.4046 1.5640 1.5202 3.0500e-
003
0.0635 0.0756 0.1391 0.0170 0.0722 0.0892 0.0000 262.4428 262.4428 0.0421 0.0000 263.4954
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.0821 0.6575 0.5500 1.1300e-
003
0.0313 0.0323 0.0636 0.0100 0.0307 0.0408 0.0000 98.2430 98.2430 0.0169 0.0000 98.6665
2021 0.4046 1.5640 1.5202 3.0500e-
003
0.0635 0.0756 0.1391 0.0170 0.0722 0.0892 0.0000 262.4426 262.4426 0.0421 0.0000 263.4952
Maximum 0.4046 1.5640 1.5202 3.0500e-
003
0.0635 0.0756 0.1391 0.0170 0.0722 0.0892 0.0000 262.4426 262.4426 0.0421 0.0000 263.4952
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.22 0.00 6.65 19.21 0.00 4.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 48 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.2675 0.0203 0.6463 1.2000e-
004
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
0.0000 15.9330 15.9330 1.3000e-
003
2.7000e-
004
16.0467
Energy 2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 100.7484 100.7484 3.5500e-
003
1.1300e-
003
101.1737
Mobile 0.1415 0.3630 1.4322 4.2900e-
003
0.4154 5.2600e-
003
0.4207 0.1111 4.9600e-
003
0.1161 0.0000 400.9406 400.9406 0.0276 0.0000 401.6304
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.7893 0.0000 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2816 25.7741 27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
Total 0.4117 0.4069 2.0885 4.5600e-
003
0.4154 0.0118 0.4271 0.1111 0.0115 0.1226 7.0709 543.3960 550.4669 0.5073 4.7300e-
003
564.5584
Unmitigated Operational
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 10-5-2020 1-4-2021 0.7551 0.7551
2 1-5-2021 4-4-2021 0.6611 0.6611
3 4-5-2021 7-4-2021 0.6672 0.6672
4 7-5-2021 9-30-2021 0.6089 0.6089
Highest 0.7551 0.7551
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 49 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.2675 0.0203 0.6463 1.2000e-
004
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
0.0000 15.9330 15.9330 1.3000e-
003
2.7000e-
004
16.0467
Energy 2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 100.7484 100.7484 3.5500e-
003
1.1300e-
003
101.1737
Mobile 0.1415 0.3630 1.4322 4.2900e-
003
0.4154 5.2600e-
003
0.4207 0.1111 4.9600e-
003
0.1161 0.0000 400.9406 400.9406 0.0276 0.0000 401.6304
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.7893 0.0000 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2816 25.7741 27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
Total 0.4117 0.4069 2.0885 4.5600e-
003
0.4154 0.0118 0.4271 0.1111 0.0115 0.1226 7.0709 543.3960 550.4669 0.5073 4.7300e-
003
564.5584
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 50 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/5/2020 10/7/2020 5 3
2 Grading Grading 10/8/2020 10/15/2020 5 6
3 Building Construction Building Construction 10/16/2020 8/19/2021 5 220
4 Paving Paving 8/20/2021 9/2/2021 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 9/3/2021 9/16/2021 5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 125,550; Residential Outdoor: 41,850; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 2,378
(Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0.91
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 51 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 4 10.00 0.00 114.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 8 61.00 13.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 12.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 52 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.2 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.3900e-
003
0.0000 2.3900e-
003
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.5200e-
003
0.0303 0.0173 4.0000e-
005
1.1900e-
003
1.1900e-
003
1.1000e-
003
1.1000e-
003
0.0000 3.2802 3.2802 1.0600e-
003
0.0000 3.3067
Total 2.5200e-
003
0.0303 0.0173 4.0000e-
005
2.3900e-
003
1.1900e-
003
3.5800e-
003
2.6000e-
004
1.1000e-
003
1.3600e-
003
0.0000 3.2802 3.2802 1.0600e-
003
0.0000 3.3067
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 53 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.2 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 5.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1140 0.1140 0.0000 0.0000 0.1141
Total 5.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1140 0.1140 0.0000 0.0000 0.1141
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 9.3000e-
004
0.0000 9.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
004
0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.5200e-
003
0.0303 0.0173 4.0000e-
005
1.1900e-
003
1.1900e-
003
1.1000e-
003
1.1000e-
003
0.0000 3.2802 3.2802 1.0600e-
003
0.0000 3.3067
Total 2.5200e-
003
0.0303 0.0173 4.0000e-
005
9.3000e-
004
1.1900e-
003
2.1200e-
003
1.0000e-
004
1.1000e-
003
1.2000e-
003
0.0000 3.2802 3.2802 1.0600e-
003
0.0000 3.3067
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 54 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.2 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 5.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1140 0.1140 0.0000 0.0000 0.1141
Total 5.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
3.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1140 0.1140 0.0000 0.0000 0.1141
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 5.9200e-
003
0.0656 0.0315 6.0000e-
005
3.0700e-
003
3.0700e-
003
2.8200e-
003
2.8200e-
003
0.0000 5.6380 5.6380 1.8200e-
003
0.0000 5.6836
Total 5.9200e-
003
0.0656 0.0315 6.0000e-
005
0.0213 3.0700e-
003
0.0244 0.0103 2.8200e-
003
0.0131 0.0000 5.6380 5.6380 1.8200e-
003
0.0000 5.6836
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 55 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.3 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.3000e-
004
0.0162 4.0500e-
003
4.0000e-
005
9.8000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
2.7000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
3.2000e-
004
0.0000 4.3832 4.3832 4.6000e-
004
0.0000 4.3947
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.2000e-
004
8.0000e-
005
9.3000e-
004
0.0000 3.3000e-
004
0.0000 3.3000e-
004
9.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2851 0.2851 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2852
Total 5.5000e-
004
0.0163 4.9800e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3100e-
003
5.0000e-
005
1.3600e-
003
3.6000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 4.6682 4.6682 4.7000e-
004
0.0000 4.6799
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 8.3100e-
003
0.0000 8.3100e-
003
4.0100e-
003
0.0000 4.0100e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 5.9200e-
003
0.0656 0.0315 6.0000e-
005
3.0700e-
003
3.0700e-
003
2.8200e-
003
2.8200e-
003
0.0000 5.6380 5.6380 1.8200e-
003
0.0000 5.6836
Total 5.9200e-
003
0.0656 0.0315 6.0000e-
005
8.3100e-
003
3.0700e-
003
0.0114 4.0100e-
003
2.8200e-
003
6.8300e-
003
0.0000 5.6380 5.6380 1.8200e-
003
0.0000 5.6836
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 56 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.3 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.3000e-
004
0.0162 4.0500e-
003
4.0000e-
005
9.8000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
2.7000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
3.2000e-
004
0.0000 4.3832 4.3832 4.6000e-
004
0.0000 4.3947
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.2000e-
004
8.0000e-
005
9.3000e-
004
0.0000 3.3000e-
004
0.0000 3.3000e-
004
9.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2851 0.2851 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2852
Total 5.5000e-
004
0.0163 4.9800e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3100e-
003
5.0000e-
005
1.3600e-
003
3.6000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 4.6682 4.6682 4.7000e-
004
0.0000 4.6799
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0654 0.5028 0.4335 7.2000e-
004
0.0277 0.0277 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 59.9013 59.9013 0.0125 0.0000 60.2137
Total 0.0654 0.5028 0.4335 7.2000e-
004
0.0277 0.0277 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 59.9013 59.9013 0.0125 0.0000 60.2137
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 57 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.1600e-
003
0.0379 0.0103 9.0000e-
005
2.2500e-
003
2.0000e-
004
2.4500e-
003
6.5000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
8.4000e-
004
0.0000 8.7025 8.7025 7.3000e-
004
0.0000 8.7206
Worker 6.5400e-
003
4.5800e-
003
0.0520 1.8000e-
004
0.0184 1.2000e-
004
0.0185 4.8900e-
003
1.1000e-
004
5.0000e-
003
0.0000 15.9389 15.9389 3.6000e-
004
0.0000 15.9480
Total 7.7000e-
003
0.0425 0.0623 2.7000e-
004
0.0207 3.2000e-
004
0.0210 5.5400e-
003
3.0000e-
004
5.8400e-
003
0.0000 24.6414 24.6414 1.0900e-
003
0.0000 24.6687
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0654 0.5028 0.4335 7.2000e-
004
0.0277 0.0277 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 59.9013 59.9013 0.0125 0.0000 60.2136
Total 0.0654 0.5028 0.4335 7.2000e-
004
0.0277 0.0277 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 59.9013 59.9013 0.0125 0.0000 60.2136
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 58 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.4 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.1600e-
003
0.0379 0.0103 9.0000e-
005
2.2500e-
003
2.0000e-
004
2.4500e-
003
6.5000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
8.4000e-
004
0.0000 8.7025 8.7025 7.3000e-
004
0.0000 8.7206
Worker 6.5400e-
003
4.5800e-
003
0.0520 1.8000e-
004
0.0184 1.2000e-
004
0.0185 4.8900e-
003
1.1000e-
004
5.0000e-
003
0.0000 15.9389 15.9389 3.6000e-
004
0.0000 15.9480
Total 7.7000e-
003
0.0425 0.0623 2.7000e-
004
0.0207 3.2000e-
004
0.0210 5.5400e-
003
3.0000e-
004
5.8400e-
003
0.0000 24.6414 24.6414 1.0900e-
003
0.0000 24.6687
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1753 1.3857 1.2722 2.1600e-
003
0.0715 0.0715 0.0683 0.0683 0.0000 179.7100 179.7100 0.0364 0.0000 180.6205
Total 0.1753 1.3857 1.2722 2.1600e-
003
0.0715 0.0715 0.0683 0.0683 0.0000 179.7100 179.7100 0.0364 0.0000 180.6205
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 59 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.9200e-
003
0.1022 0.0286 2.6000e-
004
6.7500e-
003
2.1000e-
004
6.9600e-
003
1.9500e-
003
2.0000e-
004
2.1500e-
003
0.0000 25.8825 25.8825 2.1000e-
003
0.0000 25.9349
Worker 0.0184 0.0124 0.1446 5.1000e-
004
0.0553 3.6000e-
004
0.0556 0.0147 3.4000e-
004
0.0150 0.0000 46.1576 46.1576 9.9000e-
004
0.0000 46.1823
Total 0.0214 0.1146 0.1732 7.7000e-
004
0.0620 5.7000e-
004
0.0626 0.0166 5.4000e-
004
0.0172 0.0000 72.0400 72.0400 3.0900e-
003
0.0000 72.1171
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1753 1.3857 1.2722 2.1600e-
003
0.0715 0.0715 0.0683 0.0683 0.0000 179.7098 179.7098 0.0364 0.0000 180.6203
Total 0.1753 1.3857 1.2722 2.1600e-
003
0.0715 0.0715 0.0683 0.0683 0.0000 179.7098 179.7098 0.0364 0.0000 180.6203
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 60 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.9200e-
003
0.1022 0.0286 2.6000e-
004
6.7500e-
003
2.1000e-
004
6.9600e-
003
1.9500e-
003
2.0000e-
004
2.1500e-
003
0.0000 25.8825 25.8825 2.1000e-
003
0.0000 25.9349
Worker 0.0184 0.0124 0.1446 5.1000e-
004
0.0553 3.6000e-
004
0.0556 0.0147 3.4000e-
004
0.0150 0.0000 46.1576 46.1576 9.9000e-
004
0.0000 46.1823
Total 0.0214 0.1146 0.1732 7.7000e-
004
0.0620 5.7000e-
004
0.0626 0.0166 5.4000e-
004
0.0172 0.0000 72.0400 72.0400 3.0900e-
003
0.0000 72.1171
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.3200e-
003
0.0532 0.0589 9.0000e-
005
2.9100e-
003
2.9100e-
003
2.6900e-
003
2.6900e-
003
0.0000 7.7524 7.7524 2.4600e-
003
0.0000 7.8138
Paving 1.1900e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 6.5100e-
003
0.0532 0.0589 9.0000e-
005
2.9100e-
003
2.9100e-
003
2.6900e-
003
2.6900e-
003
0.0000 7.7524 7.7524 2.4600e-
003
0.0000 7.8138
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 61 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.5 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.7000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.1500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
8.3000e-
004
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.2000e-
004
0.0000 0.6879 0.6879 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6883
Total 2.7000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.1500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
8.3000e-
004
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.2000e-
004
0.0000 0.6879 0.6879 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6883
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.3200e-
003
0.0532 0.0589 9.0000e-
005
2.9100e-
003
2.9100e-
003
2.6900e-
003
2.6900e-
003
0.0000 7.7524 7.7524 2.4600e-
003
0.0000 7.8138
Paving 1.1900e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 6.5100e-
003
0.0532 0.0589 9.0000e-
005
2.9100e-
003
2.9100e-
003
2.6900e-
003
2.6900e-
003
0.0000 7.7524 7.7524 2.4600e-
003
0.0000 7.8138
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 62 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.5 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.7000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.1500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
8.3000e-
004
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.2000e-
004
0.0000 0.6879 0.6879 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6883
Total 2.7000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.1500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
8.3000e-
004
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.2000e-
004
0.0000 0.6879 0.6879 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.6883
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.1995 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.4600e-
003
0.0102 0.0121 2.0000e-
005
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.7022 1.7022 1.2000e-
004
0.0000 1.7051
Total 0.2010 0.0102 0.0121 2.0000e-
005
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.7022 1.7022 1.2000e-
004
0.0000 1.7051
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 63 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.2000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
6.6000e-
004
0.0000 6.6000e-
004
1.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 0.5503 0.5503 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5506
Total 2.2000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
6.6000e-
004
0.0000 6.6000e-
004
1.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 0.5503 0.5503 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5506
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.1995 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.4600e-
003
0.0102 0.0121 2.0000e-
005
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.7022 1.7022 1.2000e-
004
0.0000 1.7051
Total 0.2010 0.0102 0.0121 2.0000e-
005
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
6.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.7022 1.7022 1.2000e-
004
0.0000 1.7051
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 64 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.2000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
6.6000e-
004
0.0000 6.6000e-
004
1.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 0.5503 0.5503 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5506
Total 2.2000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
6.6000e-
004
0.0000 6.6000e-
004
1.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 0.5503 0.5503 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5506
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 65 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1415 0.3630 1.4322 4.2900e-
003
0.4154 5.2600e-
003
0.4207 0.1111 4.9600e-
003
0.1161 0.0000 400.9406 400.9406 0.0276 0.0000 401.6304
Unmitigated 0.1415 0.3630 1.4322 4.2900e-
003
0.4154 5.2600e-
003
0.4207 0.1111 4.9600e-
003
0.1161 0.0000 400.9406 400.9406 0.0276 0.0000 401.6304
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 338.00 304.42 253.58 1,097,392 1,097,392
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 338.00 304.42 253.58 1,097,392 1,097,392
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Apartments Mid Rise 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966
Parking Lot 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 66 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 73.3059 73.3059 3.0300e-
003
6.3000e-
004
73.5682
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 73.3059 73.3059 3.0300e-
003
6.3000e-
004
73.5682
NaturalGas
Mitigated
2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 27.4425 27.4425 5.3000e-
004
5.0000e-
004
27.6055
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 27.4425 27.4425 5.3000e-
004
5.0000e-
004
27.6055
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 67 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
514252 2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 27.4425 27.4425 5.3000e-
004
5.0000e-
004
27.6055
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 27.4425 27.4425 5.3000e-
004
5.0000e-
004
27.6055
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
514252 2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 27.4425 27.4425 5.3000e-
004
5.0000e-
004
27.6055
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 2.7700e-
003
0.0237 0.0101 1.5000e-
004
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
1.9200e-
003
0.0000 27.4425 27.4425 5.3000e-
004
5.0000e-
004
27.6055
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 68 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
216198 68.8854 2.8400e-
003
5.9000e-
004
69.1319
Parking Lot 13873.9 4.4205 1.8000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.4363
Total 73.3059 3.0200e-
003
6.3000e-
004
73.5682
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
216198 68.8854 2.8400e-
003
5.9000e-
004
69.1319
Parking Lot 13873.9 4.4205 1.8000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.4363
Total 73.3059 3.0200e-
003
6.3000e-
004
73.5682
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 69 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2675 0.0203 0.6463 1.2000e-
004
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
0.0000 15.9330 15.9330 1.3000e-
003
2.7000e-
004
16.0467
Unmitigated 0.2675 0.0203 0.6463 1.2000e-
004
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
0.0000 15.9330 15.9330 1.3000e-
003
2.7000e-
004
16.0467
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.2266 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.5000e-
003
0.0129 5.4700e-
003
8.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
1.0400e-
003
1.0400e-
003
1.0400e-
003
0.0000 14.8885 14.8885 2.9000e-
004
2.7000e-
004
14.9770
Landscaping 0.0194 7.4000e-
003
0.6408 3.0000e-
005
3.5300e-
003
3.5300e-
003
3.5300e-
003
3.5300e-
003
0.0000 1.0445 1.0445 1.0100e-
003
0.0000 1.0698
Total 0.2675 0.0203 0.6463 1.1000e-
004
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
0.0000 15.9330 15.9330 1.3000e-
003
2.7000e-
004
16.0467
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 70 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.2266 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.5000e-
003
0.0129 5.4700e-
003
8.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
1.0400e-
003
1.0400e-
003
1.0400e-
003
0.0000 14.8885 14.8885 2.9000e-
004
2.7000e-
004
14.9770
Landscaping 0.0194 7.4000e-
003
0.6408 3.0000e-
005
3.5300e-
003
3.5300e-
003
3.5300e-
003
3.5300e-
003
0.0000 1.0445 1.0445 1.0100e-
003
0.0000 1.0698
Total 0.2675 0.0203 0.6463 1.1000e-
004
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
4.5700e-
003
0.0000 15.9330 15.9330 1.3000e-
003
2.7000e-
004
16.0467
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 71 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
Unmitigated 27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
4.03955 /
2.54667
27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 72 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
4.03955 /
2.54667
27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 27.0557 0.1327 3.3300e-
003
31.3648
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Unmitigated 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 73 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
28.52 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
28.52 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 5.7893 0.3421 0.0000 14.3428
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 74 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual
11.0 Vegetation
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/25/2020 12:14 PMPage 75 of 75
Orange Corporate Yard - Orange County, Annual