RES-9762 Denying Conditional Use Permit 2417-02RESOLUTION NO. 9762
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ORANGE DENYING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 2417-02 AND
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 03-4, WHICH
SOUGHT TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF
AN EXISTING FACILITY FOR WOMEN AND
THEIR CHILDREN AT 655 SOUTH GLASSELL STREET - THE
ELI HOME,
INC.APPLICANT: THE ELI HOME,
INC.MICHAEL
GALLOWAY)WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2417-02 and
Administrative Adjustment No. 03-4 were filed by Michael Galloway, representing The Eli Home,
Inc., in accordance with the provisions of the City of Orange Municipal Code, to
allow additional development of a .42 acre (18,445 sq. ft.) lot (655 South Glassell Street) by
constructing a 2-story Craftsman Style building comprised of2 apartment units (a combined total
of3,938 sq. ft.),a 2-story 2,434 sq. ft. addition to the existing 2,047 sq. ft.
residence (a combined total of 4,481 sq. ft.), a 2-car 553 sq. ft. garage, a 3-car carport, and
the demolition of a 256 sq. ft.storage unit along
the north side of the property; and WHEREAS, Conditional
Use Permit No. 2417-02 and Administrative Adjustment No. 03-4 were processed in the time
and manner prescribed by state and local law; and WHEREAS,
Conditional Use Pennit No. 2417-02 and Administrative Adjustment No.03-4 are
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),per CEQA
Guidelines Section 15303 (Class 3, new construction or conversion
of small structures) and Section 15332 (Class 32, In-Fill Development); and
WHEREAS, the subject property is commonly known
as 655
South Glassell Street and is more particularly described as follows:PARCEL 1:LOT 6
AND 7 IN BLOCK 4 OF NUTWOOD PLACE,
IN THE CITY OF ORANGE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE(S)
70 AND 71 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 17.00 FEET OF SAID LOT
6 AS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ORANGE IN THE
GRANT
DEED RECORDED APRIL
26,
PARCEL 2:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK D OF THE CHAPMAN
TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ORANGE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 102, PAGE
15 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK
4 OF NUTWOOD PLACE, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4
PAGES 70 AND 71 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, THENCE
EASTERLY 262.85 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS
6 AND 7 IN SAID BLOCK 4 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTHERLY 25 FEET ALONG THE
EXTENDED WESTERLY LINE OF ORANGE STREET, THENCE
WESTERLY 240 FEET IN A STRAIGHT LINE, PARALLEL WITH
THE SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID LOTS 6 AND 7; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 2
IN THE GRANT DEED TO THE CITY OF ORANGE RECORDED
APRIL 26, 1973 IN BOOK 10664 PAGE 502 OFFICIAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly advertised public hearing on June
24, 2003, to consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2417-02 and Administrative
Adjustment No. 03-
4; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the City Council heard testimony
of the Applicant, eight members of the public, and considered documentary
evidence presented.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Orange that Conditional Use Permit No. 2417-02 and Administrative
Adjustment No. 03-4 are hereby denied
for the following reasons:I. The proposed project is unusual for the area in that it
has frontage on both the east side of Glassell Street and the west side of Orange Street.
Glassell is an 80-foot wide four-lane primary arterial. Orange Street is
a substandard street in terms of width. It measures just 25 feet wide curb to curb. The
standard for this type of neighborhood street is 36 feet wide. Due to
the substandard width, parking is permitted on the east side only. Orange Street
cul-de-sacs at the
project location,with Hart Park immediately south.2. The neighborhood on Orange Street
both around the project and on adjacent streets to the north and
east is characterized primarily by single-family homes.There are some duplexes and/or second units in
the rear yard of some of the single-family homes. The nearest major
street running perpendicular to the project is La Veta Avenue, two blocks north of the
project location. From La Veta Avenue to the project's cul-de-sac
location, there are 23 lots with frontage on Orange Street.None
of
developments. No multiple family development takes access off Orange Street in
this neighborhood.
3. Glassell Street, south of La Veta Avenue to the project location, has a much
different character. It is characterized primarily by multiple family residential uses
on the east or project side of Glassel1. All of these multiple family residential uses
take access off Glassell. On the west side of Glassell, south of La Veta Avenue to
the project, is a large church, restaurant use and multiple family residential use. All
take access off Glassell. The lot directly north of and adjacent to the project on
Glassell is a multiple family development that takes access off Glassell.
4. It is estimated that there are currently approximately 160 trips a day
generated on Orange Street, south of La Veta. While no specific trip generation
statistics are available for this particular type of project, using trip generations
statistics for apartments, which most closely matches the proposed use, staff
estimates that the project would generate another 45-66 trips per
day.5. Trip generation statistics for apartment uses are appropriate for the
projects for several reasons. One, the subject property is zoned R-3. Two, the
R-3 zone permits multiple family residential units. Three, once constructed,
the proposed use could change to a multiple family residential use, potentially
without any further approvals
from the City.6. The project is located in the City's Old Towne Historic District,
which is on the National Register of Historic Places and according to
the State Historical Resources Survey, is the second largest concentration of historic
structures in the State. Of the 23 lots with frontage on Orange Street south of La
Veta, IS contain contributing residential historic structures (see attached map).
Hart Park, located immediately south of and adjacent to the project is also on
the National Register Listing. While public testimony and legal arguments were presented
that the so-called, Watson House, located on the project site is a
contributing historic structure and/or should be listed as such, the City Council makes no finding
that the Watson House is or should be listed as
an historical structure.7. As noted, Orange Street is a narrow substandard street. With a
car parked in the street, two-way traffic becomes difficult. The ability of two
cars to pass safely on trash days is perhaps not possible. While Orange Street
is capable of handling the additional traffic trips generated by the project, the project
would result in an estimated 28%-41% increase in daily trips on Orange Street.
And while there was conflicting testimony as to whether this project would generate
less or more trips than staff's estimates for multiple family housing as
noted above, once constructed the project could potentially be converted to
multiple family housing without further discretionary
approvals from the City.8. Because of the substantial percentage increase in
traffic generated by this project, the narrowness of Orange Street, the cul-
de-sac location and the character of residential development on Orange Street
vs. Glassell Street, access should be taken off Glassell. Requiring access off Glassell
is
on both Glassell and Orange. There is little objective evidence to suggest that
access off Glassell Street presents any particular problems from either a traffic or
safety standpoint. No evidence was presented that any of the multiple family
developments adjacent to and near the project have created any particular traffic
problems by taking access off Glassell. Other than having to modify their plans, the
applicant did not present significant evidence that requiring access of Glassell Street
posed a hardship. There was no public testimony against taking access off Glassell
Street. The weight of the evidence is that the impact of additional traffic on
Glassell Street would be far less significant than it would be on Orange Street.
9. Because the project is in the Historic District, it is subject to the Old Towne
Design Standards. Part ill, Chapter 5, of the Old Towne Design Standards provides
in pertinent part:
a. The design of a new residence shall be complementary to other
residences on the block. Specifically, infill construction shall be
consistent with the following characteristics of contributing
buildings on the street.
1. Massing, scale, shape and proportions.
2. Open space, rhythm and pattern.
Chapter 5, subparagraph B, Design Standards, further provides:
a. All buildings shall have a minimum front yards setback of 20 feet.
b. No required parking shall be permitted in front of any principal
building.
The project is not in keeping with the Old Town Design Standards or the
historical character of the neighborhood in that it proposes to locate a garage
structure facing out on Orange Street across the entire width of the property and
proposes that required parking be placed in front of the garage, adjacent to Orange
Street. Because of the uniqueness of the project (frontages on both Glassell and
Orange), it should be designed as if it had two frontages, to make the project's
scale, shape and rhythm in line with other historic contributing structures on Orange
Street and in line with the neighborhood's historical character and usage. The
parking should not be placed in front of the principal building(s) on Orange Street.
There is no significant justification for permitting an intrusion into the required
setback of 20 feet. The bulk and mass of the project in relationship to the existing
neighborhood on Orange Street is too great.
10. The City Council is charged with the preservation of the City's Historic
District. Chapter 17.17 of the Orange Municipal Code directs the City to, among
other things, review development to ensure that it is compatible with community
aesthetics, that it encourages preservation of historic resources, introduces
complementary design and construction. As proposed by the applicant, this project
does not accomplish these goals.
4
L
ADOPTED this 22nd day of July 2003.
ATTEST:
Cassandra J. Ca c ,City Clerk, City of Orange
I, CASSANDRA J. CATHCART, City Clerk of the City of Orange,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held
on the 22nd day of July 2003, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS: Alvarez, Murphy, Coontz
COUNCILMEMBERS: Ambriz
COUNCILMEMBERS: Cavecche
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
a/4~,(A~1Iea;~ -IJ7
Cassandra J. C art, City Clerk, City (If Orange
5