The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-16-20 1997 N. Orange Olive Road 301-343 E. Grove Avenue - Cohen Residential Project (DRC 4969-19)AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE September 16, 2020 TO: THRU: FROM: CHAIR SKORPANICH AND MEMBERS OF THE DESIGN REVIEW Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director� Monique Schwartz, Associate Plannerif\r 1. SUBJECT SUMMARY RECOMMENDED ACTION 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION (L Zog C B ( Exsg M Sff k ) ss w b rf kg g Assd Z g N 2 (A Olv Sp ),T T 0 M S 9699, n bs 85 v C Pj DRCITEM 1 09/16/2020 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION f ubj I xad pv pd g O Sp b te pp jc,f 11 p lso cu Tv T p p b p nd s T p Ps I g uuit l m rt rior g x ry ry a are c f G g g o sene rfc Sff P s pjc g ry css to T c ur g , p re g n e ar T c ps u f p b l u f f f S S 9 T c j ,n u d f v f rvng G ' g e W D H , H W ,T mts DRCITEM 2 09/16/2020 dg r rt f jc the r f lry mtal, /qy,e d mg f g x cm bl i f l p h Spf P rtg cpe ad g.S P y cg s g cl eg by r ft p ve,and ff j . ec n xr g h ced v ry y c park. p tt p ry ce d tt , c wi h C y'S M P pj s and n G A , ,ffe ng he f A qr h O ge O ive S P k t ry c t s ,bl s, f a q I ,pr vae y y . k f h ma v n R B ky p v y rd areas n p w p o hrubs,ad w S P A acd m ry k T p O Oli Ra, g l A exc p n j ry P et ro g m p g a the j n n r y rf h s dewalk b n. DRCITEM 3 09/16/2020 6. EXISTING SITE k,tres O ;u g l ih J 7. EXISTING AREA CONTEXT jc i s Cy x al, S t rt ls h P I (H)5 -y inial G y Shff Park. 1960'-ry x -y s th west O O v R F R F w Eh l Ta ct H D 8. ANALYSIS AND STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES I 1: A c c n- I c h Design G O g S P , h d ffr (M S Irv G I W , C mpr y M)E p ff rv Gl r u n w m , bay w , , s ding, x g . i but to c c j ud u fsh , , S-, x h m ys, u v m , ys ws, flat y z , x , k , y , , rgl ry F e r , , y u by gy , Is : L S k p vi g n n c y w h DRCITEM 4 09/16/2020 v R s wth g p h tw lgs .x J to h j Jr n og E N Swby p Nrt n . T tt Sma W F P (L3)fot tl p t Nrth Oge a,a (x )w wi g h i b os s e P rt x sti gts e h S P t h p h v s w h a g l p . r y o g t t x g e v s .3 y h f T os th m o F th S L acade c u . qr g p tt y ff DRCITEM 5 09/16/2020 9. ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION 10. PUBLIC NOTICE pj y ffd ,pb g,y ,b g iy N g 3,DC g j d n O g cu Pg C C b 11. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW bq g N 86-1 b i c d cud tt '.DRC s c f MN kg ndon j T MD ccu j gfc c t he h p B gic , C c , G ,N.cts d c,b C T pb v iod s ,20 h b ,.MD b b C m y D D rt C k ff y s bsi e. 12. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUIRED FINDINGS rts e "F " b s n y i k z k .kg by "m k Fi ," s g h (s mony rts, m c,l rt m s. w rt Fg b b tw d ,b h ig k k . T "Fdng " ,,b in der pp ( ec p f) p j . yn g o ; d k b k Fs . Fndg C a : • g p M ) • I R D G • H i P rv n y O To g S OD ) DRCITEM 6 09/16/2020 O Ov E G A v ffret t y mras by Irv Gi ,c ,f p, ,d ,q ,d ,,facade v rt. Sk p v rt S Nrt Org Ov o E G Av pp pa frd y v P k T s fy t q g a s b c l a rt , v v us y O g Ov S P b o os ed jc c P O O II jt sg O O S P . T f 32 u be t y I p j O Ol ve P 13. CONDITIONS p : T jc c b b om S f , x Att 3 5 ff prt (v A 2 , 2020)lu a y q b v m for D C tt 2 Ex rw v , j . A y v , y b m ttd C y D D v I Dv lo m D w v pv a,v b t DRCITEM 7 09/16/2020 n y w ,Cy rgai V w au o o pr. 6 Bu r b k q te Oag Dp rtn Bg D F b qu b b a p 7 I ze j a x 24 o Ex o y b ,q w w OMC S 17 08 060 T P B P p n w 8 I j o , n 7 8 . M u Su N w b p n S F 9 T d g ui w b B D e k . 10. A ff b 72 y O No Vio t/rt 11 Ay gh p w n , c n ff jg rt no b x ba f rt 12. P ld , a n o mm pm q p s b j p rt T n w i ng a p m 13 P ui u p p a p P D j /b in DRCITEM 8 09/16/2020 14. ATTACHMENTS V #-2 Jn 5 sh@ X L KTGY xi N:\CDD\PLNG\Applications\Zone Change\ZC 1297-19 Gove Residential\DRC\DRC Staff Report 9. 16.20 DRCITEM 9 09/16/2020 Vicinity Map 1997 N. Orange Olive Road and 301-343 E. Grove Avenue Design Review No. 4969-19 �£A'!SA� ; l;tj -2 M-2 � N s CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATIACHMENT NO. 1 DRC NO. 4969-19; COHEN RESIDENTIAL PREOJECT VICINITY MAP Sept. 19, 2020 DRC Meeting Amendment to the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan Phase II Applicant: COHEN LIVING TRUST 4922 E. SOMERTON AVE. ORANGE, CA 92867 CONTACT: PHILIP SCHWARTZE, PROJECT MANAGER Prepared by: 2400 E. Katella Ave., Suite 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 Contact: Lindsay Ortega, AICP MAY 2015 rev. AUGUST 2015 rev. MAY 2019 (Phase II) ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRC NO. 4969-19; COHEN RESIDENTIAL PREOJECT AMENDMENT TO ORANGE OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN Sept. 19, 2020 DRC Meeting AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 What is a Specific Plan? .......................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Authority and Scope of the Specific Plan ............................................................................... 1‐1 1.3 Purpose of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan ............................................................................. 1‐2 1.4 Relationship to City’s General Plan ........................................................................................ 1‐2 1.5 Specific Plan Objectives ........................................................................................................ 1‐10 1.6 Relationship to City’s Zoning Code ....................................................................................... 1‐10 1.7 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance ............................................................... 1‐10 1.8 Support Documents .............................................................................................................. 1‐11 1.9 Organization of the Specific Plan ......................................................................................... 1‐11 CHAPTER 2.0 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................. 2‐1 2.1 Regional and City Context ...................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.2 Local Context .......................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.3 Existing Site and Land Use ...................................................................................................... 2‐7 CHAPTER 3.0 Development Plan .............................................................................................. 3‐9 3.1 Project Overview .................................................................................................................... 3‐9 3.2 Phase I .................................................................................................................................. 3‐13 3.3 Phase II ................................................................................................................................. 3‐19 CHAPTER 4.0 General Plan Consistency ................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 Relevant Land Use Element Goals and Policies ...................................................................... 4‐1 4.2 Relevant Circulation and Mobility Element Goals and Policies .............................................. 4‐3 4.3 Relevant Growth Management Element Goals and Policies .................................................. 4‐3 4.4 Relevant Natural Resources Element Goals and Policies ....................................................... 4‐3 4.5 Relevant Public Safety Element Goals and Policies ................................................................ 4‐4 4.6 Relevant Noise Element Goals and Policies ........................................................................... 4‐4 4.7 Relevant Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element Goals and Policies ............. 4‐5 4.8 Relevant Infrastructure Element Goals and Policies .............................................................. 4‐5 4.9 Relevant Urban Design Element Goals and Policies ............................................................... 4‐6 4.10 Relevant Economic Development Element Goals and Policies .............................................. 4‐6 4.11 Relevant Housing Element Goals and Policies ....................................................................... 4‐7 CHAPTER 5.0 Land Use and Development Regulations ............................................................. 5‐1 5.1 Purpose and Intent ................................................................................................................. 5‐1 5.2 General Provisions .................................................................................................................. 5‐1 5.3 Land Use/Establishment of Zoning ......................................................................................... 5‐2 AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN ii 5.4 Development Standards ......................................................................................................... 5‐2 5.5 Landscaping, Walls and Fencing, Open Space ........................................................................ 5‐5 5.6 Parking and Lighting ............................................................................................................... 5‐8 5.7 Development Provisions Comparison .................................................................................... 5‐9 CHAPTER 6.0 Design Guidelines ............................................................................................... 6‐1 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 6‐1 6.2 Site Planning ........................................................................................................................... 6‐1 6.3 Architectural Design ............................................................................................................... 6‐1 6.4 Landscape Architecture Guidelines ...................................................................................... 6‐27 CHAPTER 7.0 Access, Circulation and Parking .......................................................................... 7‐1 7.1 Access ..................................................................................................................................... 7‐1 7.2 Circulation and Parking .......................................................................................................... 7‐6 CHAPTER 8.0 Infrastructure Improvements ............................................................................. 8‐1 8.1 On Site Drainage and Storm Drain System ............................................................................. 8‐1 8.2 Water System ......................................................................................................................... 8‐5 8.3 Sewer System ......................................................................................................................... 8‐6 8.4 Electrical System ..................................................................................................................... 8‐7 8.5 Natural Gas System ................................................................................................................ 8‐7 8.6 Telecommunications System .................................................................................................. 8‐8 8.7 Cable Television System ......................................................................................................... 8‐8 8.8 Solid Waste Disposal .............................................................................................................. 8‐8 8.9 Domestic Utilities ................................................................................................................... 8‐9 CHAPTER 9.0 Administration and Implementation .................................................................. 9‐1 9.1 Administration and Enforcement ........................................................................................... 9‐1 9.2 Development Procedures ....................................................................................................... 9‐1 9.3 Phasing and Construction Schedule ....................................................................................... 9‐2 9.4 Financing and Maintenance of Improvements ...................................................................... 9‐2 Appendix A– IS/MND – Phase I ............................................................................................................ 1 APPENDIX B – SUBSEQUENT IS/MND – Phase II .................................................................................... 2 Appendix C – PHASE II Development Plans ........................................................................................... 3 AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1‐1 Specific Plan Area ...................................................................................................................... 1‐3 Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I (1) ............................... 1‐4 Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I (2) ............................... 1‐5 Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I (3) ............................... 1‐6 Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II (1) .............................. 1‐7 Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II (2) .............................. 1‐8 Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II (3) .............................. 1‐9 Figure 2‐1 Regional and Local Vicinity Map ............................................................................................... 2‐3 Figure 3‐1 General Plan Land Use Map .................................................................................................... 3‐11 Figure 3‐2 Zoning ..................................................................................................................................... 3‐12 Figure 3‐3 Phase I Site Plan ..................................................................................................................... 3‐15 Figure 3‐4 Floor Plan – Plan 1 (Phase I) .................................................................................................... 3‐16 Figure 3‐5 Floor Plan – Plan 2 (Phase I) .................................................................................................... 3‐17 Figure 3‐6 Floor Plan – Plan 3 (Phase I) .................................................................................................... 3‐18 Figure 3‐7 Phase II Conceptual Site Plan .................................................................................................. 3‐21 Figure 3‐8 Floor Plan – Plan 1 (Phase II) ................................................................................................... 3‐22 Figure 3‐8a Reverse Floor Plan – Plan 1X (Phase II) ................................................................................. 3‐23 Figure 3‐9 Floor Plan – Plan 2 (Phase II) ................................................................................................... 3‐24 Figure 3‐10 Floor Plan – Plan 3 (Phase II) ................................................................................................. 3‐25 Figure 5‐1a Wall and Fence Plan – Phase I ................................................................................................ 5‐6 Figure 5‐1b Wall and Fence Plan – Phase II ............................................................................................... 5‐7 Figure 5‐2 Conceptual Open Space Plan – Phase II .................................................................................. 5‐12 Figure 6‐1 Elevation Plan 1 ‐ Phase I .......................................................................................................... 6‐4 Figure 6‐2 Elevation Plan 2 ‐ Phase I .......................................................................................................... 6‐5 Figure 6‐3 Elevation Plan 3 ‐ Phase I .......................................................................................................... 6‐6 Figure 6‐4 Elevation Plan 1A ‐ Phase II ....................................................................................................... 6‐7 Figure 6‐4a Elevation Plan 1AX ‐ Phase II ................................................................................................... 6‐8 Figure 6‐5 Elevation Plan 1B ‐ Phase II ....................................................................................................... 6‐9 Figure 6‐5a Elevation Plan 1BX ‐ Phase II ................................................................................................. 6‐10 Figure 6‐6 Elevation Plan 1C ‐ Phase II ..................................................................................................... 6‐11 Figure 6‐6a Elevation Plan 1CX ‐ Phase II ................................................................................................. 6‐12 Figure 6‐7 Elevation Plan 1D ‐ Phase II .................................................................................................... 6‐13 Figure 6‐7a Elevation Plan 1DX ‐ Phase II ................................................................................................. 6‐14 Figure 6‐8 Elevation Plan 2A ‐ Phase II ..................................................................................................... 6‐15 Figure 6‐9 Elevation Plan 2B ‐ Phase II ..................................................................................................... 6‐16 Figure 6‐10 Elevation Plan 2C ‐ Phase II ................................................................................................... 6‐17 Figure 6‐11 Elevation Plan 2D ‐ Phase II .................................................................................................. 6‐18 Figure 6‐12 Elevation Plan 3B ‐ Phase II ................................................................................................... 6‐19 Figure 6‐12a Elevation Plan 3BX ‐ Phase II ............................................................................................... 6‐20 Figure 6‐13 Elevation Plan 3C ‐ Phase II ................................................................................................... 6‐21 Figure 6‐13a Elevation Plan 3CX ‐ Phase II ............................................................................................... 6‐22 Figure 6‐14 Elevation Plan 3D ‐ Phase II .................................................................................................. 6‐23 Figure 6‐14a Elevation Plan 3DX ‐ Phase II .............................................................................................. 6‐24 Figure 6‐15a Street Scene (Orange‐Olive) – Phase I ................................................................................ 6‐25 Figure 6‐15b Street Scene (Orange‐Olive and Grove) – Phase II ............................................................. 6‐26 Figure 6‐16a Conceptual Landscape Plan – Phase I ................................................................................. 6‐30 AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN iv Figure 6‐16b Conceptual Landscape Plan – Phase II ................................................................................ 6‐31 Figure 6‐17a Conceptual Planting Plan – Phase I ..................................................................................... 6‐32 Figure 6‐17b Conceptual Planting Plan – Phase II .................................................................................... 6‐33 Figure 6‐18 Conceptual Lighting Plan – Phase II ...................................................................................... 6‐34 Figure 6‐19 Conceptual Photometric Plan – Phase II ............................................................................... 6‐35 Figure 7‐1 Existing Roadway Classifications in the Specific Plan Area ....................................................... 7‐3 Figure 7‐2 Transit Routes Serving the Specific Plan Area .......................................................................... 7‐4 Figure 7‐3 General Plan Bikeways Serving the Specific Plan Area ............................................................. 7‐5 Figure 7‐4 Fire master Plan – Phase II ........................................................................................................ 7‐8 LIST OF TABLES Table 3‐1 Unit Plan Summary .................................................................................................................. 3‐14 Table 3‐2 Unit Plan Summary .................................................................................................................. 3‐20 Table 5‐1 General Plan Land Use Designation for Orange‐Olive Specific Plan .......................................... 5‐3 Table 5‐2 Allowable Lot Coverage/Floor Area Ratio Requirements .......................................................... 5‐4 Table 5‐3 Building Setbacks ....................................................................................................................... 5‐4 Table 5‐4 Orange‐Olive Specific Plan Development Standards Comparison ........................................... 5‐10 Table 8‐1 Public Service and Utility Providers ........................................................................................... 8‐9 Table 9‐1 Financing and Maintenance ....................................................................................................... 9‐2 AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 1‐1 CHAPTER 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 What is a Specific Plan? A specific plan is a regulatory tool that local governments use to implement the general plan and to guide development in a localized area. While the general plan is the city’s overall guide for growth and development and the zoning code is the tool for regulating development in the entire city, a specific plan is a detailed plan for the development of a particular site or area. Specific plans provide more specificity for the types of uses to be permitted, development standards (setbacks, heights, landscape, architecture, etc.), and circulation and infrastructure improvements within identified subareas of the city. Specific plans can provide flexibility in development standards beyond those contained in the zoning code in order to achieve a customized development pattern. A specific plan should encourage desired patterns of activity, land uses and development types, and remove constraints to efficient development. A specific plan also sets forth strategies for improvements in the specific plan area, including circulation, parking and streetscape improvements. 1.2 Authority and Scope of the Specific Plan California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457 (Specific Plans) grants authority to cities to adopt specific plans for purposes of implementing the goals and policies of the general plan. The Planning Commission must hold at least one public hearing before the planning agency can recommend the adoption of a specific plan. As expressed in California law, specific plans may be adopted either by ordinance or by resolution. This allows jurisdictions to choose whether their specific plans will be policy driven (adopted by resolution) or regulatory in nature (adopted by ordinance). As set forth in the Government Code, Section 65451, a specific plan must contain the following information:  A description of the general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land within the area covered by the plan.  The proposed distribution, location, extent, and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the Specific Plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan.  Standards and criteria by which development will proceed and standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable.  A program of implementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works projects and financing measures necessary to carry out the above information. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 1‐2 1.3 Purpose of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan (Specific Plan) is a regulatory document, adopted by ordinance by the City of Orange (City), and serves as the adopted zoning for the properties located at 2025 North Orange‐ Olive Road (Phase I) and 301 E. Grove Road (Phase II). The City has utilized specific plans as tools to achieve the customized development of individual parcels within a broader land use context. The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan has been developed specifically to accommodate a 25 unit detached residential product type on a constrained infill development site, known as Phase I (originally entitled as “Orange‐Olive”). Phase I is defined as the 2.33 net acre project site located at 2025 North Orange‐Olive Road in the City of Orange (City) in the north‐central portion of the City (Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I). In 2020, the Specific Plan was amended to incorporate the adjacent property to the south of Phase I, referred to as Phase II and is defined as the 2.9 net acre project site located at 301 East Grove Avenue in the City of Orange (Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II). The Phase II project proposes a 32 unit detached residential project consistent with Phase I. The total amended Specific Plan area is 5.23 net acres (Figure 1‐1 Specific Plan Area). The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan document incorporates the conceptual site plans, elevations, and landscape plans for each phase and establishes development standards and design guidelines to provide guidance and limits for future adjustments to the development plan. Phase I and Phase II, taken together, afford the cohesive development of the two sites as an infill neighborhood condition that better integrates with the larger surrounding park and neighborhood context. The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan is one of the more than 10 specific plans adopted by the City. The purpose of the Specific Plan is to regulate development within the specific plan boundaries in order to ensure orderly development and compatibility with existing uses in the surrounding areas. Uses, development plans, site plans and any subsequent development activity within the project site must be consistent with both the Specific Plan and the City’s Orange General Plan (General Plan). 1.4 Relationship to City’s General Plan The Orange General Plan is a “blueprint” that documents the City's vision for the future and provides goals, policies, and implementation measures that can be utilized by City staff and decision makers to proactively influence physical growth and change in a manner consistent with this vision. The General Plan provides the City with a multi‐disciplinary strategy for achieving the vision in the context of the land use, circulation & mobility, housing, open space, conservation, public safety, noise, cultural resources & historic preservation, growth management, economic development, infrastructure and urban design elements. The City of Orange General Plan Land Use Element (adopted in 2010) identifies a vision for future development and land uses in the Specific Plan Area. This Specific Plan is a land use tool to more specifically guide, control, and regulate future development in the Specific Plan area in a manner that implements the land use vision and the goals and policies identified in the General Plan. Figure 1-1: Speciöc Plan Area City of Orange Environmental Advisors, LLC Orange Olive Speciöc Plan Legend: Speciöc Plan Area Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020Figure 1-2a: Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan - Phase I (1) Figure 1-2a: Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan- Phase I (2)Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 Figure 1-2a: Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan - Phase I (3)Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 %˩ ˩ ș˩ '˩ ØȢɂ˩ Ǜ[˩ à˩ïò˩Z0˩ ˩ %˩ Ë˩ ˩ -˩ ˩ %˩±˩ ˩-=˩ s˩g˩ ˩OĴ#|˩ ˩à˩ȊĚǍ0˩˩"ɫ˓˩·˩ !B:l˩ ˩˩ ˩ ˩5˩ȱʥȾn˩ ¸ś˩ ˩ %˩Ë˩ ˩-=˩±˩ ˩-=ȶg˩ ˩ Dȳ|˩ ˩ ō˩3!˩ ǹ˩ ˩ ň˩ Ɯ˩ !A˩Ćƙ˩ ˩ɟNɶ&˩ ő˩ ˩ 5˩I˩ ˩ ˩ǻ˩ $ɲÒ˩ ˩ ɴ˩ ȷȒµ˩±÷˩ OĴ4|˩ ȋǾɃǘ˩˩"ɪ˒ ˩Ǚ<˩ ˩ ˩ !ł˩ W˩ ˩ ˩ D#%˩ ˩˩ ˩ ˩ KO;˩ ĳʦn˩¸ś˩r²˩ SÄS˩ Õ˩ ĵŃ˩ 5˩ =B.ːµ˩ Ǻn˩ ˩ ˩ ?˩ ˩ K˩ ĳðǫn˩¸ʤ˩ 1M˩Ŋ.˩TŬ˩>ø˩ö˩ƶQ^˩Ô`˩ '˩˩ ñ˩D4˩ ˩5˩ ʧɄŔɰ˩ʳɎ@˩ ˩ K˩ ȭ˩ ʉj˩ÅRQ˩ "ɥ˩c˩ ˩ jǋ˩5 M˩r².öZ˩>Ɲ˩ Õ˩ W<˩˩c˩ ˩ j˩'˩ ˩ B.ö˩e#n˩ ˩ ˩[˩ˏ0˩ B˩"+į˩ɜ0˩ ˩ Ǧ˩ɬqʔ˩ M˩zŞ˩?Tĉơ˩Ô`˩ ń<˩˩=B.˩D4˩ ˩K ˩ ˩'˩%˩˩ O#%˩ ˩K˩˩CǇ˩ M˩B˩ƞü˩Õ˩ń<˩˩D#˩'˩5˩!ł˩ ˩ǒȸ##¬ȴż˩ģ˔Ǩ˩˩˩˩Ô`˩Nɨ˩˩ģ˕ǩ˩ ˩ ˩Ȍ˩ ˩ġ˩'˩ 5˩ Ë˩ ˩-=˩ )y˩ɖÊ˩˩ >˩2˩ǡ˩ ^ƳƮ˩ʀA˩Ƽ˩ ˩J(˩Ƿ˩K˩˩X˩ɋ*xa˩»¬˩ 5˩ ʋ@˩îŧ˩W˩ ˩ä!˩Öa˩˩ǎ~˩ C˩ !A˩?˩ ˩$è˩ ˩Xu/˛˩ ˩5˩JM˩ ˩5˩±˩N$eUȡ˩ ˩K ˩ɷ˙˩ G˩ ˖ȥÀ˩[h˩ œcš˩ ǱɊ˩ B˩ _t˩'˩ j˩ ºf˩ B˩˩ îŧ˩ ˩ ˩ʂ˩$èE˩˩˩ zŖ˩ ˩ oõ˩ ˩ ˩ sg˩ ˩ Oȫ4|˩ "9˩ c˩ ˩ [˩ ˩c6˩D(Ģ˩ʌ'˩˩ F˩ "9.˩˩˩ *+ ˩ $exa˩ʱ˩Ċ˩>?˩2˩~˩Ǝ˩ !A˩S ć˩ ˩J(˩);E˩kP,˩V$6˩˩«˩˩˩>˩ &˩ ˩˩ 3˩Ƣ˩ ƿƯ˩ ˩á˩˩ S˩ ȩȐȂ˩˩İ4Ó˩ɞÒ˩ ˩Øĭ¨˩ Ǟ4M˩ľĺɑÒ˩ºÎʃȚ˩ K ˩ İ4Ó˩ ɗ¬ɕ˩ ˩ Øĭb˩ ǓʑM˩ľĺ¨f˩ǧƷå<˩ 5˩ ˅ɩ˩ ˩ %˩ [Zf˩ĵŃ˩˩ ˩ ˩ rǢȿ@ȯf˩ ˩N)0˩ 3˩ ^\˩ ǂ˩ 2˩ ň˩ Ơ˩ !A˩ ?˩ ˩ I(˩ Ę˩ ˩)0˩3˩Ä˩ ǀ ˩2˩~˩ÄƑƟ˩ !A˩˩ ˩J(˩)§E˩úP,6˩ V$˩Ûå<˩ ˩ ˩`˩ ɧ*+16˩ "9˩ ˩!7ʈʒ¾˩^˩3ʮ&˩¤O#Ñ˩ ˩ ·˩ ¡©s2˩ P®˩ b:tĥ0˩v@{īĿ1˩Ƕ ˩˩~˩ Æ\˩ !A˩ Ə˩ ˩I(˩N¥U¶˩kP,˩V$6˩Ü<˩'˩˩`˩ 7+ ˩"9˩˩³7w˩S˩ ŗ Ś¾˩ "9˩ ©˩ B˩ .˩!˩ ß#Ó˩ ;˩ Ė;˄6˩ ˩œc6˩DåĒxb˩ʄ'˩˩F˩"9.˩2˩˩ Ĝã1˩ Ǹ0˩2˩~˩CưĄ˩!A˩ƥ˩ ˩I(˩);E˩ ˩Æ˩˩˩˩˩>˩^˩S˩kP,˩V$6˩!˩«˩˩˩zŖ1Ś¾˩2˩oõ˩ ˩ʝ5į˩ßĲ4|˩ĨÝʜ˩ĕŋ÷˩˩¦Ōŉ˩l˩"9˩țf˩ ˩.˩ɹ˩ D4Ȧ˩ ˩ ǴĞ*6˩˩ Þc6˩Ēȉ˩'˩˩ F˩ "9.˩ 2˩ ˩ ʾ+ ˩ey˩ ˩ ~˩ SC˩!A˩?R˩ ˩I(˩N)U¶Q˩kP,˩V$6˩˩«˩˩˩ŗùw˩2˩oõ˩ ˩r²5ı˩ßĲ4|˩ĨÝìŅ˩ɭŋ÷˩ ˩¦Ō-˩l˩"9˩ ¨ɒ$ʶÞ˩Yɺɻ˩ ;˩£ɘ*4ƈ˩_l˩ ũʭ˩ ˩ ʍc6˩ 2ǭĢ˩Î'˩ ˩ F˩ "9.˩ 2˩ ˩ 7®˩ )xa˩ ɍu˩ C\˩ ˩ ˩dŠ˩=8Q˩ G>TƵƹ˩ ˩I(˩Ę¶ý˩kP,˩V$6˩!˩«˩˩ ˩˩ġ˩ ˩şʿ˩ '˩í$u˩ ˩Ɍʫȧ&˩2˩˩ 7+1˩ǣey˩áæ%˩ ˩ ˩˩di*,1˩8Q˩ ÁHLƦ˩ ˩J(˩ė;E˩˩˩Y´/˩3h¿˩˩ ʟȺã1˩ ˩˩ ˩ 3çũ˩ *ħ˩ B˩ '˩Ǐǳ˩ u˩ ˩ ˩ ˩Ȇ_]@˩íǤ*ʎ˩"9˩˩ɦ×:]˩íȃ0˩˩ Ȕ˩ ˩iŢ&˩îŨ˩˩Zə˩ =8þ˩ T˩ ˩ Ĝ+ ˩ N$-Uĩ˩ ļ#˩ C˩ ˩ ˩ dô+ ˩ 8ý˩ RHLÂƭƫƺƄ˩ ˩J(˩)§E˩˩˩Y´/˩3h¿˩3&˩ ¤D#Ñ˩ ˩ ˩ Đs˩ ¹® ˩ b:ta˩ vɀ˜ʊŢ&˩Yǐ&sǪ˩¡©ƸȰďg˩ ˩ O#Ȉ#˩{ȕ ˩Œ˩ļ#%˩C\˩ ˩ ˩dŠ˩=8˩ ÁHLƧ˩ ˩I(@˩N);E˩kP,˩V$6˩Û<˩'˩!˩`˩ 7+ ˩"9˩˩³7w˩˩ *)0˩ zF˩ ».˩ ÉfřÇD˩ Z¯˩ Ťš˩ çUā:]&˩ ˩!Ŧïņ&˩ F˩ "9.˩ Ȥ˩ ˩ ÌɅìēɵ˩ ˩ ˩ 7,˩ b:ó˩ŘÈ-ğqǌ˩]˩ WG ĀŕòČM˩ ˩ ˩ʺɳ+ ˩ {Į˩Œ˩}æ˩ ˩ ˩˩di*, ˩8Q˩ ÁHLÃÅ ă˩ ˩J(˩¦;E˩˩{Ȗ˩ ęa˩}4˩ ˩ ˩˩ RHLƨă˩ ˩Iǯ˩Ő$-;˩ºÊ˩ sʨµ˩ ·˩ K ˩Ħ@F˩Ù˩Ď˩äĠ˩YÈeUɆqg˩'˩ %˩ ¹+1˩:t ˩ vĝÏĪ˩ ˩iūŪ˩)y˩ }#%˩ C\˩ ˩ ˩ ô®1˩ 8þ˩ ĂRHLÂĈ˩ ˩J(˩¥§E˩úP,6˩V$˩Û<˩'˩˩`˩ 7+ ˩Ȳ˩˩³7w˩˩ *)0˩ zF˩ ».˩ ÉfřÇD˩ Z¯˩ Ťʹ˩ ĖUā:]ŕ˩ ˩!Ŧïņ&˩ F˩ "9.˩ Ĭ˩ ˩ Íìē80˩ ˩ ˩ 7,˩ b:ó˩Řč-ğq˩]\˩ Wû Ā&òČM˩ ˩˩ʼ+ ˩ {Į˩N)0˩}æ˩Ʋ˩ ą ˩˩di*,1˩8˩ą ƋRHLÃÅ ˩ ˩I¡Ļ˩ő¶Ž˩˩ {īŀ˩ ęÏ0˩}#˩C˩ ˩ ˩ƚ RHLƩ˩ ˩I(˩Ő¥;˩ºÊ˩sʩµ˩ ·˩ K ˩ Ħ@F˩Ù˩Ď˩äĠ˩Yčeȍqg˩˩ %˩ ¹+ ˩:ta˩ ĝÏĪ˩ ˩ iūŪ˩ )y˩ á#%˩ C\˩ ˩ ˩ ô,1˩ 8ü˩ ĂRHLÃĈ˩ ˩J(˩)§E˩kP,6˩V$˩Ü<˩'˩˩`˩ 7+ ˩"9˩˩³7w˩˩ ÖqǮ<˩ Zŀ˩¦y˩}˩ C˩ ˩ ˩ dşˀ+ ˩ 8À˩ RHLƪĄ˩ ˩J(˩)UE˩˩˩Y´/˩3h¿˩3&˩ ¤O4Ñ˩ 2˩ ˩ĐʡÇD˩ 7+ȝ˩ b:ó˩ vŁƊ:¡˩ ˩ȁʴ˩ ˩*â˩Kv˩ N¥Uĩ˩Ȯˁ˩C˩ ?˩ ˩di*,1˩8ž˩ƴƍƬƒƛ˩ ˩I(˩);E˩˩˩Y´/˩3hŲ˩_t˩£é˩ŝ1Ŝ˩ ˩ _t˩£é˩ŝ1Ŝ˩˩ 7,ǟ ˩ ˩%, , , %, %!, %!%, , %, %+, , !, '%+, ,!, #&, , !, #, #*, , ,, , , , ,, , , !!, , #'!)+#, , %, , , %, '%+, !!!, , #, '%+, {Y\+U>7{YPFl7{ {\n{Ȫ˩ Ȅ˧ˢųˣˤǉ˥½˩ĶuʻŎ˩ ɐm¼˩ʙxjâ˩{ê°ſ˩X¢ȓ˩ [pp˩ëɤɼƀ˩Xjpm˩ë°Ɓ˩p X¢ʁ˩ autwv#{ ){ " $ , ( , Z\YZ{ `8{ \{MCV8{ y{>\Yl7{ { \n{ Ƈ˦ŶŷˠŸŹźm¼˩êˈĿÎ˩m¼˩ ¢*ʅÈ˩m¼˩½˩Ķ˂ʣʪŎ˩Xɇ m[pâ˩{ª/˩ /˩ ª/˩˩/˩ ˌǰʢ˘˩ɝɽ˩˩'˩˩Ƚ/˩/˩ȹɢxċ˩˩/˩ů˞ˎŴ˩ƅ˩˨˩>?^Gƣ>G?Z+\28M{/YjV5+\r{8+`8Q8Vc{MCV8{ ë°ƃ˩X[˩ ˩ ǔ@ʏɡĹ˩ʘŨ˩ ÚȣŇ˩ ˩ ʖ˩ W˩ %˩Ǘ<˩ǕʽȞ˩ ě˩ÙeĻ˝Ň˩ Wi˩ ˩_l˩ Ȼ&˩ 8ÿ˩ >Ɠǃ˩ ;˩ ˩_l˩ ȼ&˩ =8Ƃ˩>ć˩ ǚ<˩ B.˩ TŭƤTŰƔ˩ z˩ ō˩ $èX˩W˩ Öɓ˩ ˩ 5˩ JM˩5˩ ŉA˩ Ǽ˩Yŏ/˚Q˩bĸ#ȗǄ˩Ȏ˩¨ŁĸȘȵ˩2˩ ˩˩ʞʆÜĹ˩Ì˩ ʠg˩˩ÚĬɚ˩Ú¬˩ ˩ƕƻ˩ù?^w ƱƽG T Ǡ˩ɣQ ˩ ĤG?G ˩ ĥĽˆǅ˩ ĉTƐŮ˩űǽ˩ ˩-A˩ǜđ¯ʐ˩ ˩ʰ¯ ˩ ˩ˍ˩ƾ˩ȇʓĚɾ:] ˩ ÌȨǿɈǖ0˩ ˩ ě˩ƘƌH˩"ɸ4;˩ >˩ >ƉÂ˩ ǥ&˩ u3u3˩ǝđɛɏ˩Íʛ˩3! ˩vĤGÆG ǆ˩ F˩ ˩ ˩ ŊÐ@ʯ˩ė4n˩ǈŵŻƆ˩ ˩˩ĆÀS˩o˩˩?˩o˩ ǵȀg˩ðǬ˩ǑʚqQ˩ 3W*ã ˩ à˩ďZ0˩ ˩˩ BÐ@ñ˩ -#©˩ ˩ ˩ ʕ:l˩ ˩ -ķû/˩ ˩ ˩ ª/˩ ˩ˊ*ħ˩ T˩ o˩ rȏÐ@Ş˩˩ ˩ %˩ ÉñO˩ ˩-=ķG/˩ ʇ8ċ \˩ ĊS˩ o˩ B˩ ˩ %˩ Zɔ4˩ ˩ ª/˩˩ť*ȑ˩ɠ˩˩ʗ˩ˉĽ˩».˩%˩ðɱ˩˩ȅ˩¤ʵŏ˩2hţǊ˟ø˩ ˋĞ˩Ĕ1˩Ĕ ˩˃ˇ<˩ʸ&˩ jh˩-=A˩[h˩Í&¸˩Fˑf˩˩ ˩-=A˩8qC`hV>{\8c+CVCV>{n+MM{28Vc8\MCV8{+5I+28Vc{Z\YZ8\r{MCV8{8q{Q+V@YM8{8q{ <C\8{@s\+Vc{`x\88c{MC>@c{`CV>M8{{>\YjZ{x\88` {8q{ Z+\KCV>{MYc{MC>@c{^ƖƗ˩ˡ˩ rɮnʲ˩˩ť¹˩-=˩ ˩ǁ?˩ȜʷÞ˩r²5ı˩OȬ#ɉ@˩aÝŔŅ˩ĕɿ˩ʬȠɁç˩½˩ " $ , ( ,×˩%˩×˩£é˩˩ţ˩ǲ˗˩ɯ˩_]&˩ê°ÿ˩X¢mȟ˩jpp˩ autwv#{){{{ !{ { ?],[AC3{ a3,N9${ {*{ ({ Dbbk:%{d;Wd-eEm;{6-e:%{ 4B:4L:6%{^Jm{ 6_-p%{R-0{6\+oX>{=DO:%{ ""iS{[\YI:2f{XY%{z{bB::g{XkT1:\&{ bB::gb{b4-O:'{ .{GH{ 2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO $% 6j[3 VTMty~ [VQ;9 6j[3,y~ 6j[3.T9 Aji;[zy~ [VQ;9 6j[3.T9 Aji;[- o9;[F33VT Aji;[{.u X.mR;Tb.9. [.RX rw f[jT6.f;9 9VR;_{RV9jP.[ vh.T9__t_f;R_|[;RVm ;sF_gTA 9[Fmn.t.T9[;XP.6; rw 6j[3.T9 Aji;[ %! ! %%! a5 ^x%%% c%% ? ?^ # b5%% ! ?L c%%}# ?%%! b5%% ?L # b5 ?L & %!# %#%%%%%% % B\/YDF5^5/L<'+ % % !% " " % !!% G``k=(7WT7>Zdl0N9.e=("8E=8K=:(70S :]1q(S049[.pUA @GO=($ 7CY[VJ=6eUV(_E==bUkR3=])_E;=e_`81O=* 2HI2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO ££§¨¨ -¨ev¨dv-"¨-¨dv¨ x¨ Vedv]¨ %¨IV~¨mevV¨ x¨MV¨ {]~ITVT¨ x¨ *¨ Te{¨-*)¨]¨-%)¨ev¨ --"¨-)¨dv¨!$-%%¨dv¨ dv¨-$%¨dv¨x¨!% -¨dv¨ ev¨--¨dv¨x¨--)¨[m!$¨-)¨ev¨&!¨-%%¨ev¨ ]M¨-%"¨dv¨%¨ --¨[l¨-)¨ev¨¨[m¨)¨dv¨-$¨ & '%'$'''' !"#' 8¡vvVP¨ x¨ Vegv]¨ x~s¨T~Idv¨ ldvV¨ dv~¨ x¨ MV¨ [dVlT¨ V~e[dVT¨9¡vvVP¨ z¨ Vegv]¨PIP`¨ MIev¨ evV~¨x¨ MV¨[dVlT¨V~e[dVT¨:dvIlm¨ ¤¨ `T{V¨ x~s¨ T~Idv¨ ldvV¨;dvIlm¨ *¨ `T{V¨ x~s¨ T~Idv¨ ldvV¨<¡v~P¨M~xxk¨ ""¨ T~x{¨ evmV ¨VvPdm¨`¨ vx¨Ts{dv]¨ T~Iev¨ x¨ xPVIv¨=¡v~P¨ !$¨TV¨ PIP`¨ MIdv¨{V~¨{{P¨ T¨! !¨>dvIlm¨ "-¨ sxTmI~¨ mIvT¨ Mdx[dmV~¨?dvIlm¨ *%¨ sxTmI~¨ mIvT¨ Mdx[dmV~¨ F¡vvVP¨ z¨ Vegv]¨ IV~¨ldvV¨ a¨ [ddv]¨ IvT¨`~VV¨IlV¨GdvIlm¨ %¨{P¨ P -¨{d{V¨PmI¨ ¨`¨MVTTdv]¨@dvIlm¨ [d~V¨ aT~Iv¨IVsMl¨`¨ ]IV¨ ImV¨HdvIlm¨ %¨TxMlV¨ P`VPk¨TVVPx~¨ IVsMm¨ A¡vvVP¨ x¨Vdev]¨ IV~¨mevV¨`¨ [ddv]¨ IvT¨ `~VV¨ Il¨7evIml¨ ¤¨ {P¨ P-¨{e{V¨PmI¨ ¨e`¨MVTTev]¨3 evIml¨ "¨{P¨ P-¨{d{V¨ PmI¨¨a¨ MVTTev]¨4 evIml¨ ¤¨ TxsVdP¨ IV~¨ V~ePV¨5 evIml¨ "¨ sVV~¨IvT¨Im¨6 evIml¨ "¨MIPk[nx¨{~VVvV~¨¥ d[¨Vegv]¨ V~dPV¨ d¨~VVT ¨ Iv¨I{{~xT¨ MIPk[mx¨ {~Vvdxv¨ TVdPV`Iol¨ MV¨ dvImmVT¨ MV`dvT¨ `V¨ sVV~¨ `ev¨`V¨vVI~V¨x[PI{V¨ B¡vvVP¨ x¨Vdev]¨V~¨ M¨ evV~¨x¨ MV¨[dVlT¨V~d[eVT¨CevIml¨ "¨{P¨ T~¨ !$¨VV~¨ ldvV¨`¨MVTTdv]¨DevIml¨ %¨{P¨ T~¨ !$¨VV~¨ ldvV¨`¨MVTTdv]¨EevIml¨ *¨{P¨ T~¨ !$¨VV~¨ ldvV¨`¨MVTTdv]¨ Pxv ~P¨ "*¨ W~¨ sIv`xmW¨Pxv ~P¨VV~¨ PlVIvx¨ ¨¡¢¨ # '¨ ^J|bdQ¨ QJpX.¨ 2 ¨ fY/¨RyvRZ}Kq¨UI/¨ScYSkYU/¨i¨ UI/¨tKN¨UIv_¨ \drY/¨ ++(¨ R¨|xjYS¨ wx/¨¦¨cYY¨ vuOY~0¨¨cYY¨SIrY1¨ L¨,h¨2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 1‐10 1.5 Specific Plan Objectives The Amendment to the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan includes 57 units of detached residential housing that reflect modern interpretations of the Spanish, Craftsman, Contemporary, and Prairie architectural styles. The project is designed to further contribute to the current range of housing stock options in area, to help support the residential needs of area business employees, and to make efficient use of constrained infill development sites. The units in Phases I & II are all two stories and combine three bedroom floor plans with office, loft, and/or den space/fourth bedroom option, as well as some four bedroom floor plans. The architectural design concept is presented in Sections 3.1 and 4.1 of this document. The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan is intended to achieve the following objectives:  Provide new single‐family housing product in the City of Orange that will be within proximity to job opportunities, commercial centers, regional transportation, and recreational amenities.  Develop a cohesive residential community that provides efficient site planning while utilizing high quality architectural design and standards.  Construct higher density development that is compatible and will integrate well with the existing single‐family residential neighborhoods in order to help meet the City’s housing needs.  Ensure the new development enhances and is visually compatible with the adjacent City park and surrounding neighborhood, including the mid‐century modern Fairmeadow Eichler Historic District by utilizing architectural features inspired by Irving Gill and suitable landscaping along the project frontage and main entryway.  Invest in the area by constructing housing that will attract residents who will enhance the vitality of the surrounding community, while also ensuring that adequate infrastructure and services are provided. 1.6 Relationship to City’s Zoning Code The Orange Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning Code), the primary tool used to implement the General Plan, regulates development type and intensity citywide. Development regulations imposed include those setting limits on building height, requiring setbacks, and specifying the percentage of a site that must be landscaped. The Zoning Code also outlines standards for residential planned unit development and affordable housing, among many other land use issues. The adopted Specific Plan serves as the zoning for the project site and establishes development standards for the Specific Plan Area. The standards and regulations of the Specific Plan shall prevail and supersede the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, except in instances where regulations in the Specific Plan are silent on a specific issue, in which case the provisions of the Zoning Code shall prevail. 1.7 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to State and Local CEQA Guidelines, the City of Orange AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 1‐11 prepared an Initial Study/Environmental Checklist and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Phase I and a Subsequent MND for Phase II to analyze potential impacts of the Specific Plan. The MND includes an introduction, project description, description of existing environmental conditions, assessment of impacts and mitigation measures in accordance with CEQA guidelines. The City of Orange determined that although development of the project site would result in impacts to the environment, the impacts would be less than significant with the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. A copy of the Phase I MND and Phase II Subsequent MND are included as Appendix A and Appendix B respectively, of this document. 1.8 Support Documents This document referenced existing resources as background information during the analysis phase in support of the recommendations of this Specific Plan. These supporting documents are listed below and are available at the City of Orange Planning Department. 2010 Orange General Plan The Orange General Plan is a “blueprint” that documents the City's vision for the future and provides goals, policies, and implementation measures that can be utilized by City staff and decision makers to proactively influence physical growth and change in a manner consistent with this vision. The General Plan provides the City with a multi‐disciplinary strategy for achieving the vision in the context of the land use, circulation & mobility, housing, open space, conservation, public safety, noise, cultural resources & historic preservation, growth management, economic development, infrastructure and urban design elements. The 2010 General Plan enables the City to better define its image and position within the region, allow its commercial districts to better compete in the local and regional marketplace, maintain and reinforce existing neighborhood values, address local and regional environmental issues, and thus provide a better quality of life for the citizens of Orange. http://www.cityoforange.org/depts/commdev/planning/general_plan.asp Orange Municipal Code The Orange Municipal Code is a compilation of all ordinances governing activities and development within the City. The City’s Zoning Code is contained in Title 17 of the Orange Municipal Code and provides regulations for land use and development and represents the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity or general welfare. https://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=16539 Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the 2010 Orange General Plan The PEIR prepared for the 2010 Orange General Plan provides a first‐tier evaluation of the potential environmental effects associated with adoption and the implementation of the updated General Plan. http://www.cityoforange.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=8417 1.9 Organization of the Specific Plan The Specific Plan is organized in the following chapters: AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 1‐12 Chapter 1.0 Introduction – The Introduction provides a broad overview of the authority and scope of specific plans, and the purpose of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan. Chapter 2.0 Existing Conditions – This chapter includes the location and setting of the project, objectives, and the required entitlements for the development of the project site. Chapter 3.0 Development Plan – This chapter provides an overview of the development proposed as part of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan, including site design, streetscape, and infrastructure improvement plans. Chapter 4.0 Objectives and General Plan Consistency – This chapter analyzes the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan that are most relevant to the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan and provides a brief discussion of Specific Plan’s consistency with the Orange General Plan. Chapter 5.0 Land Use and Development Regulations – This chapter sets forth the land use designation and regulations for the Specific Plan Area. Chapter 6.0 Design Guidelines – This chapter sets forth the design requirements for the Specific Plan Area, and identifies the architectural theme as well as a landscape program for the project site. Chapter 7.0 Circulation and Parking – This section defines the Specific Plan provisions for mobility and circulation within the Specific Plan Area and surrounding area. Chapter 8.0 Infrastructure Improvements – This chapter summarizes the existing infrastructure facilities and provides information on planned infrastructure upgrades for the Specific Plan Area. The recommended upgrades are based on comparing the existing facilities and their capabilities with the proposed development within the Specific Plan Area. Chapter 9.0 Administration and Implementation – This chapter provides requirements for development review, the administration and implementation of the Specific Plan, and an overall program of infrastructure financing for the necessary on‐ and off‐site public facilities. Appendix A MND No. 1837‐14 for the Orange‐Olive Phase I development. Appendix B Subsequent MND to MND No. 1837‐14 for the Orange‐Olive Phase II development. Appendix C Phase II Development Plans AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2‐1 CHAPTER 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Regional and City Context 2.1.1 City of Orange Regional Context The Specific Plan Area is located in the City of Orange in central Orange County, approximately 32 miles southeast of Los Angeles (Figure 2‐1 Regional and Local Vicinity Map). The City of Orange lies in the heart of north‐central Orange County, an area undergoing a marked change in land use. To the west and south are the rapidly growing and urbanizing cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove and Santa Ana. To the southeast is the City of Tustin. In addition, Villa Park is completely contained within the borders of the City of Orange. To the east lies vast acreage of unincorporated land within the County of Orange. The City has a population of more than 140,000 people and covers more than 35 square miles. The Planning Area encompasses approximately 23,800 acres (37 square miles), including about 22,400 acres (35 square miles) within the City’s corporate limits and 1,400 acres (2 square miles) of unincorporated land. An additional 15,800 acres (24 square miles) are in the City’s sphere of influence located east of the City and outside the Planning Area. The City of Orange has a variety of land use types and residential neighborhoods that stretch from the Santa Ana River to the Anaheim Hills, supporting a wide variety of lifestyles. These residential options include the dense urban environment of Uptown, the small‐town flavor of Old Towne, the “modernism for the masses” Eichler tracts, and semi‐rural equestrian‐oriented neighborhoods such as Orange Park Acres. Orange benefits from its location near six major freeways that link the City to residential communities, shopping, and jobs throughout Orange, Los Angeles, and Riverside Counties. Orange is connected to the surrounding region through a complex network of freeways; through Metrolink, a commuter rail system; and through bus transit provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The City occupies a unique geographic location that offers residents and businesses easy access to both the benefits of urban living and the quiet solitude of open spaces and suburban life. 2.2 Local Context The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan Area is located in the north‐central portion of the City of Orange that saw the most growth and development between 1960 and 1970, as the original farms and orchards were replaced with residential subdivisions. The Specific Plan Area is located along the North Orange‐Olive Road corridor between Meats Avenue to the north and Taft Avenue to the south (Figure 2‐1 Regional and Local Vicinity Map). The Orange‐Olive area is a transitional area of the City where a mix of uses including residential, commercial, and industrial land uses come together. A multi‐family apartment complex is located immediately north of the Specific Plan area. Further north, at the northeast corner of Meats Avenue and Orange‐Olive Road is a gas station. Shaffer Park is located to the south of the Specific Plan area across East Grove Avenue, with multi‐family residential uses, and a church further south. Single‐family residential uses are located along both sides of Shaffer Street to the east of the Specific Plan area. These are primarily 1960s‐era single‐story detached houses on lots ranging from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet with front and rear yards. The site is within a half mile of one of three mid‐century modern Eichler tracts located in Orange County, the Fairmeadow Eichler Historic District. Further east of Shaffer Street is a single‐family residential neighborhood. Orange‐Olive Road is immediately west of the AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2‐2 project site, followed by railroad tracks and various commercial and industrial uses that are part of a larger commercial and industrial area that extends westerly away from the Specific Plan Area, between Fletcher Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, all the way to the Santa Ana River. The following photos provide views of the area surrounding the Specific Plan Area: Nearby Property (North of Specific Plan) Adjacent Property (North of Specific Plan) Multiple‐family residential buildings on the southeast corner of Meats Avenue and Orange‐Olive Road. Multiple‐family residential immediately north of the Specific Plan area. Figure 2-1: Regional and Local Vicinity Map City of Orange Environmental Advisors, LLC Orange Olive Speciöc Plan Legend: Speciöc Plan Area AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2‐4 Nearby Property (North of Specific Plan) Nearby Property (Northwest of Specific Plan) Nearby Property (Northwest of Specific Plan) Gas station on the northeast corner of Meats Avenue and Orange‐Olive Road. Industrial buildings located on the northwest corner of Meats Avenue and Orange‐Olive Road. View from the intersection of Meats Avenue and Orange‐Olive Road showing the railroad crossing and the industrial buildings on the southwest corner. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2‐5 Nearby Property (West of Specific Plan) Nearby Property (Southeast of Specific Plan) Nearyby Property (Southeast of Specific Plan) View of the existing railroad tracks on the west side of Orange‐Olive Road and the industrial buildings west of the Specific Plan area. View from Orange‐Olive Road looking east into the Schaffer Park located south of the project site. View from the intersection of Grove Avenue and Orange‐Olive Road of Schaffer Park located south of the Specific Plan area. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2‐6 Nearyby Property (Southwest of Specific Plan) Industrial buildings located on the southwest corner of Grove Avenue and Orange‐Olive Road. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2‐7 2.3 Existing Site and Land Use 2.3.1 Phase I Project Site The project site is comprised of two phases. Phase I is a rectangular parcel that is approximately 2.33 net acres and was occupied by Shannon’s Storage of Orange, a vehicle self‐storage facility. The Phase I project site previously provided storage for trailers, motorhomes, boats, campers, and other autos. The business was in operation at this location since 1960 and maintained attendants on site 24 hours a day. A parking and access way for the apartments to the north are located along a portion of the north property line adjacent to the Phase I project site. The rear yards of single‐family homes are located along the east boundary of the Phase I project site. The Phase I project driveway is 24 feet wide and centrally located along the street frontage. 2.3.2 Phase II Project Site The Phase II project site is an irregular shaped, relatively flat parcel that is approximately 2.9 net acres and developed with a single story, multi‐tenant retail plaza constructed in 1964. A second multi‐tenant building was constructed near the corner of Orange‐Olive Road and Grove Avenue in the 1980’s. A service alley is located between the Phase I and Phase II parcels (on the south of the Phase I project site and north of the Phase II project site). At the south‐west corner of the Phase II project site, at the intersection of Orange‐Olive and Grove Avenue, is a single‐story, 2,630 square foot multi‐tenant building that was constructed in the ‘80s. A stucco wall developed as a part of Phase I is located along the northern property line, and a concrete masonry block wall is located along the eastern property line of the Specific Plan area. Parking is not allowed on Orange‐Olive Road abutting the Specific Plan area; however, restricted parking is permitted on Grove Avenue. Currently, the Phase II street frontages consists of curb, gutter and an 8‐foot‐wide sidewalk and a planting strip containing small and medium‐ sized shrubs adjacent to the western and southern property lines. Additionally, the Grove Avenue frontage is lined with street trees. Phase II Project Site (Facing East) AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2‐8 Phase II Project Site (Facing Northwest) Phase II Project Site (Facing SouthEast) Phase II Project Site (Facing Northeast) AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 3‐9 Southern Border of Phase II Project Site (Facing East) From Phase II Project Site (Facing Northwest) CHAPTER 3.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3.1 Project Overview The development plan is separated into two phases (e.g. Phase I and Phase II). Development within the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan includes the demolition of all structures, asphalt and associated utilities on each respective project site. The Specific Plan area is designated Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) under the 2010 Orange General Plan (Figure 3‐1 General Plan Land Use). The Phase I and Phase II project sites are zoned R‐3 (SP). The entitlement process outlined in 3.2.1 and 3.3.1 denotes that both phases were re‐zoned R‐3 (SP) (Figure 3‐2 Zoning Map). The implementation of the Specific Plan allows for similar design, setback, and landscaping standards as the R‐3 zone without having to create individual lot lines. The Phase I and Phase II developments feature detached condominium‐type units that allow a higher density than other detached unit types. This type of development provides the benefits of single‐family housing types, such as individual backyards and private courtyards on some units, at a density that is normally associated with multi‐family development AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 3‐10 for lots of this size. This also enables the project to maximize the density on each project site while providing more private open space than is provided in a traditional multi‐family product type. The architectural character for the Specific Plan is inspired by the work of Irving Gill and features architectural elements inspired by the Walter L. Dodge House, Horatio West Court, and various cottages designed by Gill. Architectural elements include use of arches, rectangular massing, and light exterior walls. A more thorough discussion of the architectural design of the Specific Plan is included in Chapter 6.0. Figure 3-1: General Plan Land Use City of Orange Environmental Advisors, LLC Orange Olive Speciöc Plan Legend: Open Space Park Project Site Low Medium Residential Low Density Residential Light Industrial Limited Business Single Family Res 8,000 sf Residential Multiple Family Project SiteResidential Duplex 6,000 sf Figure 3-2: Zoning Map City of Orange Environmental Advisors, LLC Orange Olive Speciöc Plan Legend: AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 3‐13 3.2 Phase I 3.2.1 Required Approvals Phase I was approved on November 10, 2015 and consists of 25 detached single‐family residential condominium units on a 2.33‐acre site. The 25 single‐family dwellings are located on one legal lot, with “exclusive use areas” for each unit (as well as common areas) delineated on the final tract map. The LMDR allows a density of 6.1 to 15 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), which equates to a maximum of 35 dwelling units allowed on the Phase I site. The development under Phase I of 25 single‐family homes on the project site results in a maximum density of 10.7 du/ac, consistent with the current General Plan Land Use designation for the project site and with the mix of single‐family homes and apartments in the surrounding area. Prior to Phase I approval, the project site was zoned Commercial (C‐1), which was inconsistent with the LMDR land use designation. The C‐1 Zone does not allow single‐family residential uses. According to the General Plan’s Land Use Zoning Consistency table (Table LU‐3), the R‐2 (Duplex Residential), R‐3 (Multi‐ Family Residential) and MH (Mobile Home) zoning districts are compatible with the site’s LMDR General Plan land use designation. Therefore, the Phase I development changed the zoning of the site to R‐3 in order to bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan. The Phase I development established this Specific Plan to ensure site specific development standards for the Specific Plan area. This Specific Plan regulates the development of the project site and allows for the proposed single‐family detached residential units on the Specific Plan area. Development standards established under the Specific Plan are similar to the standards specified under the Multiple‐Family Residential (R‐3) Zone within the Zoning Code but are customized to better accommodate the detached condominium product type. The development standards are outlined in more detail in Section 5.0 of this plan. The Specific Plan allows for single‐family detached residential condominium units in a manner consistent with the LMDR land use designation, and allows the flexibility to implement alternative development and design standards for the project site. Phase I development of the project site required the following actions: 1. Change of Zone No. 1274‐14 from C‐1 to R‐3 (SP) and establishment of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan – Approved [11/10/2015 – ORD 09‐15] 2. Major Site Plan Review No. 0778‐14 ‐ Approved [11/10/2015 – RESO 10908] 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 17758 (Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I) ‐ Approved [11/10/2015 – RESO 10908 (Final Map No. 0033‐14)] 4. Design Review Committee (DRC No. 4749‐14) ‐ Approved [11/10/2015 – RESO 10908] 5. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1837‐14, attached as Appendix A to this Specific Plan – Adopted [11/10/2015 – RESO 10907] 3.2.2 Implemented Development The Phase I site plan design for the Specific Plan is provided in Figure 3‐3 Phase I Site Plan. Phase I consists of single‐family homes, which are two stories and range from 25’6” to 27’6” in height, and offer AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 3‐14 three different floor plans, which are summarized in Table 3‐1 below. Figure 3‐5 Floor Plan – Plan 1 (Phase I) through Figure 3‐6 Floor Plan – Plan 3 (Phase I) show the floor plans for each plan type of Phase I. Table 3‐1 Unit Plan Summary Floor Plan No. of Units Gross Area (Sq. Ft.) 1 # of Stories # of Bedrooms (Bd) # of Bath Plan I 8 2412 2 3 BD+Office+Loft 2.5 Plan II 7 2497 2 3 BD+Loft 2.5 Plan III 10 2519 2 3 BD+Den or 4 BD 3.0 Total 25 1 Gross area for each floor plan is inclusive of garages. The site design groups 24 units in six clusters of four around a shared motor court. The remaining unit is located at the east end of the main drive aisle. The clustering of detached homes is intended to create the feeling of community while also preserving privacy. Phase I residences are designed to a maximum building height to 27.5 feet in order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Each of the single family homes are provided with two private garage spaces. In addition, 22 guest parking spaces are provided, with 12 located along the main drive aisle and the rest located within the motor courts. A total of 72 parking spaces are provided on the project site, for a ratio of 2.88 parking spaces per unit. A total of 15,223 square feet (approximately 609 square feet per unit) of private open space is provided onsite. Common landscaped areas are located at the project street frontage and entry along Orange‐ Olive Road. The project entry features enhanced paving. The frontage along Orange‐Olive Road is landscaped with drought tolerant trees and plants. Landscaping and walkways are also provided between units and along both sides of the main drive aisle. Additional details are provided in Chapter 6.0 below. Figure 3-3: Phase I Site PlanSagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 Figure 3-4: Floor Plan - Plan 1 (Phase I)Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 Figure 3-5: Floor Plan - Plan 2 (Phase I)Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 Figure 3-6: Floor Plan - Plan 3 (Phase I)Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 3‐19 3.3 Phase II 3.3.1 Required Approvals Phase II consists of 32 detached single‐family residential condominium units on a 2.9‐acre site. The 32 single‐family dwellings are located on one legal lot, with “exclusive use areas” for each unit (as well as common areas) delineated on the final tract map. The LMDR allows a density of 6.1 to 15 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), which equates to a maximum of 44 dwelling units allowed on the Phase II site. The development under Phase II of 32 single‐family homes on the project site results in a maximum density of 11.0 du/ac, consistent with the current General Plan Land Use designation for the project site and with the mix of single‐family homes and apartments in the surrounding area. Appendix C includes the development plans for the Phase II residential development. The Phase II project site is zoned Commercial (C‐1), which is inconsistent with the LMDR land use designation. The C‐1 Zone does not allow single‐family residential uses. According to the General Plan’s Land Use Zoning Consistency table (Table LU‐3), the R‐2 (Duplex Residential), R‐3 (Multi‐Family Residential) and MH (Mobile Home) zoning districts are compatible with the site’s LMDR General Plan land use designation. Therefore, the Phase II proposal changes the zoning of the site to R‐3 in order to bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan. Phase II amends this Specific Plan to expand the Specific Plan planning area boundary to accommodate the Phase II development area utilizing and adhering to the Specific Plan development standards and regulations. The Phase II development of the project site requires the following actions: 1. Approval of Change of Zone No. 1297‐19 (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan) from C‐ 1 to R‐3 (SP) 2. Approval of Major Site Plan Review No. 0969‐19 3. Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 0049‐19 (Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II) 4. Review and Approval of Design Review Committee No. 4969‐19 (Appendix C – Phase II Development Plans) 5. Adoption of Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1865‐19, attached as Appendix B to this Specific Plan 3.3.2 Conceptual Development The Phase II conceptual site plan design for the Specific Plan is provided in Figure 3‐7 Phase II Conceptual Site Plan. The single‐family homes are two stories and range from 24’‐3” to 27’‐6” in height, and offer three different floor plans, which are summarized in Table 3‐2 below. Figure 3‐8 Floor Plan – Plan 1 (Phase II) through Figure 3‐10a Floor Plan – Plan 3X (Phase II) show the floor plans for each plan type. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 3‐20 Table 3‐2 Unit Plan Summary Floor Plan No. of Units Gross Area (Sq. Ft.) 1 # of Stories # of Bedrooms (Bd) # of Bath Plan I 11 2,325 2 3 BD+Office+Loft 2.5 Plan II 9 2,378 2 3 BD+Loft 2.5 Plan III 12 2,517 2 4 BD 3.5 Total 32 1 Gross area for each floor plan is inclusive of garages. The Phase II site design creates a neighborhood development consisting of an entry interior road with four interior roadways, with residences clustered on the cul‐de‐sacs of each roadway, for a total of six four‐unit clusters, and the remaining eight residences linearly situated on interior road segments. Six of the residences’ primary entry ways are accessed from the Grove Avenue frontage, cultivating a pedestrian oriented street scene consistent with Schaffer Park located directly across Grove Avenue. The Phase II residences are a maximum height of 27’‐6”. All of the single‐family homes are provided with two private garage spaces. In addition, Phase II provides 28 guest parking spaces, with 11 parallel spaces located along interior drive aisles and 17 in motor courts, providing for a guest parking ratio of 0.88 parking spaces per unit. Phase II provides 64 garaged spaces for the 32 residences withing Phase II, for a total of 92 spaces and parking ratio of 2.88 per unit. Phase II offers three plans types (Plan I, Plan II, and Plan III) all with different architectural styles consistent with Specific Plan Design Guidelines outlined in Chapter 6.0. This provides 11 architectural styles for the Phase II development. In addition to these plan type designs, modified floor plans are offered for Plan I styles to ensure residence layouts are compatible with their lot placement. Modified floor plans are denoted by an ‘X’ in the Phase II floor plan and elevation figures. Common landscaped areas are located at the project street frontages and entry along Grove Avenue, as well as throughout the interior of the project site, buffering the residences from the interior roadways. Phase II includes a common space park located directly at the end of the entry interior road. This common space park incorporates amenities for the residences of the development, including shade structure, picnic tables, and barbeque. A total of 22,090 square feet (approximately 690 square feet per unit) of private open space is provided onsite. The project entry features enhanced paving. The frontage along Orange‐Olive Road is landscaped with drought tolerant trees and plants, similar to Phase I frontage landscaping to ensure a consistent landscape design. Landscaping and walkways are provided between units and along both sides of the main drive aisle. Additional details are provided in Chapter 6.0 below. PROJECT SUMMARY - SITE 1BUILDING AND ZONING CODE SUMMARYTYPE OF CONSTRUCTIONV-BPROPOSED FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM NFPA 13DEXISTING ZONING C-1PROPOSED ZONING ORANGE-OLIVE SPECIFIC PLANPROPOSED OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3LAND USE DESIGNATIONEXISTING LMDRPROPOSED LMDR (Low Medium Residential)PROJECT SUMMARYAREA:±2.9 AC (126,324 SF±)UNITS: 32 DUDENSITY: 11.0 DU/ACFAR: 62,924 SF/126,324 SF= .498LOT COVERAGE: 38,660 SF ±UNIT PLAN SUMMARYPLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3DESCRIPTION 2-STORY 2-STORY 2-STORY3BD+OFFICE+LOFT/2.5 BA 3BD+LOFT/2.5 BA 4BD/3.5BA# OF UNITS 11 9 12TOTAL LIVING PER PLAN (GROSS) 1891 SF (±) (20,801 SF) 1947 SF (±) (17,523 SF) 2050 SF (±) (24,600 SF)GARAGE (GROSS)434 SF (±) (4,774 SF) 431 SF (±) (3,879 SF)467 SF (±) (5,604 SF)TOTAL LIVING AREA (GROSS) (62,924 SF) (±)*Floor Plan Area calculations per Section C.2 of Land Use Project Application**Per Section 17.14.130.C, residential units must be a minimum of 900 sf for 3bd units & 1050 for 4bdunits (600sf for 1st bedroom+150sf for each additional bedroom thereafter)PARKING SUMMARY (SEE NOTE FOR STRIPING)PRIVATE GARAGE SPACES 64OPEN PARKING SPACES 28(13 DRIVE - 10'-0" x 18'-0" STD), (11 INTERIOR STREET - 9'-0" x 24'-0" PARALLEL), AND (4 COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE - 9'-0" x 18'-0")REQUIRED RATIO 2.88 PER UNIT (2 PRIVATE GARAGES SPACES PER DU + 0.88 PER DU FOR GUEST)PROVIDED RATIO 2.9 PER UNITTOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 92.16 (32 DU; 2.88 /UNIT)TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 92LANDSCAPE AREA EXISTING VS. PROPOSEDEXISTING COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPED AREA - 8,173 SFPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPED AREA - TOTAL (41,625 SF)All COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS - 19,535 SFPRIVATE YARD AREAS - 22,090 SFSTORAGE SUMMARYREQUIRED STORAGE PER OMC SECTION 17.14.140PROVIDED STORAGE IN R-3 AND R-4 DISTRICT SHALL BE AT LEAST 120 CUBIC FEET FOR EACH UNIT.PROPOSED UNITS CONTAIN OVERHEAD STORAGE OF 120 CUBIC FT (APP. 60 SQ FT) PER UNITTOTAL STORAGE REQUIRED 3840 CUBIC FT (APP. 1280 SQ. FT)TOTAL STORAGE PROVIDED 3840 CUBIC FT (APP. 1280 SQ. FT)BICYCLE AND MOTORCYCLEPROVIDED 4 BICYCLE RACKSPROVIDED 3 MOTORCYCLE SPACE$$5&+,7(&785$/3/27(;+,%,7Architecture + Planning9RQ.DUPDQ$YH6XLWH,UYLQH&$NWJ\FRPCOHEN PROPERTY3ORW'DWH -XO\&21&(378$/'(6,*1&RKHQ/LYLQJ7UXVW(6RPHUWRQ$YH2UDQJH&$/DWHVW6XEPLWWDO6&$/( )LJXUH3KDVH,,&RQFHSWXDO6LWH3ODQ2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO OVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT6'-0"10'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 2.10PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLAN3 BED & LOFT - 2.5 BATH024 8Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0")LJXUH)ORRU3ODQV3ODQ3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO OVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT6'-0"10'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 2.11PLAN 1X - FLOOR PLAN3 BED & LOFT - 2.5 BATH024 8Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0")LJXUHD)ORRU3ODQV3ODQ;3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO OVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT6'-0"10'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 3.6PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLAN3 BED & LOFT - 2.5 BATH024 8Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0")LJXUH)ORRU3ODQV3ODQ3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO OVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT10'-0"6'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 4.5PLAN 3 - FLOOR PLAN4 BED - 3.5 BATH024 8Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0")LJXUH)ORRU3ODQV3ODQ3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 6'-0"10'-0"OVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FTArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 4.11PLAN 3X - FLOOR PLAN4 BED - 3.5 BATH024 8Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"ENHANCED STREET ELEVATION)LJXUHD)ORRU3ODQV3ODQ;3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 4‐1 CHAPTER 4.0 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY California Government Code Section 6540‐6553 allows for the adoption and administration of specific plans as an implementation for elements contained in a jurisdiction’s General Plan. State law requires that specific plans must demonstrate consistency with goals, objectives, policies and programs of a jurisdiction’s General Plan. To ensure the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan is consistent with the City of Orange General Plan, a thorough review was undertaken. The following is an analysis of applicable General Plan goals and policies and provides discussion relevant to the implementation of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan. This section analyzes the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan that are most relevant to the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan. Goals and policies in the General Plan that are not applicable to the Specific Plan are introduced with a brief summary and a statement that they do not specifically apply. Each grouping of the identified policy statements are followed by a brief discussion of General Plan consistency. 4.1 Relevant Land Use Element Goals and Policies LU GOAL 1.0: Meet the present and future needs of all residential and business sectors with a diverse and balanced mix of land uses. LU Policy 1.2: Balance economic gains from new development while preserving the character and densities of residential neighborhoods. LU Policy 1.4: Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development. LU Policy 1.6: Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and character of surrounding neighborhoods. Orange‐Olive Specific Plan provides a new housing product at the periphery of an existing residential neighborhood containing both apartments and single‐family homes, commercial, industrial, and public park uses. The cumulative Specific Plan density is 10.9 du/ac, well below the 15 du/ac allowed by the General Plan. This reduced density balances the economic gain from the development and is consistent with the character and density of the surrounding residential neighborhoods to the east and north. This housing product contributes to the present and future housing needs of the City by providing a unique product type that complements the existing 1960s housing stock in the surrounding area, including the Fairmeadow Eichler Historic District. Furthermore, the Specific Plan density bridges the gap between the traditional single‐family residential neighborhoods and the denser, multi‐family and apartments in the area. Providing higher density housing than what is currently available in much of the surrounding area supports the area’s role as a mixed‐density portion of the city. Additionally an increase in the variety of available housing stock ideally helps to keep housing costs down and further invests in the area’s position as a mixed use area, and a transition zone between the more heavily residential and commercial/industrial areas that surround it. The higher design standards along the periphery supports a pleasant pedestrian environment and attracts investment in the surrounding community. The architectural and design standards identified in Chapter 6.0 of this Specific Plan include qualities and features compatible with existing residential development adjacent to the project site. The maximum height limit of two stories and the careful placement of second story windows maintains consistency AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 4‐2 with surrounding development and minimizes the impact of the new development on the privacy and character of the surrounding neighborhoods. LU GOAL 6.0: Advance development activity that is mutually beneficial to both the environment and the community. LU Policy 6.1: Ensure that new development is compatible with the style and design of established structures and the surrounding environment. LU Policy 6.5: Reduce pollutant runoff from new development and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable. LU Policy 6.8: Maximize landscaping along streetscapes and within development to enhance public health and environmental benefits. The Specific Plan total project area was not previously residential, but rather a mix of commercial uses. Phase I was a storage facility covered primarily with asphalt concrete and Phase II is a commercial shopping center with limited landscaping. The Specific Plan includes a comprehensive landscape plan to install landscaping within the Specific Plan boundary and increase landscaping along Orange‐Olive Road and Grove Avenue. Within all phases of the Specific Plan area, landscaping is installed along the internal streets and the frontages of the new homes; the private yard areas are the responsibility of each homeowner. Phase I landscaping along Orange‐Olive Road increases from the current eight to ten feet to a four to 24‐ foot‐wide layered landscape area along the full frontage of the project site. The addition of landscaping on the project site reduces the amount of impervious surfaces on the project site from 95 percent to 71 percent, which aids in the reduction of pollutants and urban runoff. The site design also incorporates the use of water quality measures in the form of drywells and storm chambers to infiltrate and retain runoff from the project site. These measures enhance public health and environmental benefits by contributing to the improvement of water quality in the area. Phase II landscaping along Orange‐Olive Road includes a minimum 5‐foot‐wide landscape buffer, with vine‐covered perimeter walls and the addition of large canopy trees. Landscaping along the Grove Avenue frontage includes a landscape buffer, along with six residential entry accesses conducive to a pedestrian street scene. Multiple large canopy trees are proposed on the Grove Avenue frontage. Residences fronting Grove Avenue utilize perimeter walls of varied heights to surround private yard space (Figure 5‐1b: Wall and Fence Plan – Phase II). Both the Orange Olive Road and Grove Avenue frontages include retention of some existing street trees. Overall landscaping proposed in Phase II reduces the amount of impervious surfaces on the project site from 94 percent to 65 percent. The architectural design for the Specific Plan draws from Irving Gill’s architectural style. Irving Gill was an early modernist, and his work inspired architect and developer Joseph Eichler who is well represented within the City, with the mid‐century modern Fairmeadow Eichler Historic District, located approximately .2 miles to the south of the Specific Plan area. The homes have stucco exteriors with parapet and gable tile roofing, and include design elements respective of Gill’s style. These accent elements include exposed wood rafter tails, bay windows, wood siding, arched entries, decorative trims, and decorative exterior lighting. The area currently has a few architecturally significant residential structures, and this development continues to preserve and enhance this tradition by constructing homes inspired by Gill that are elegant, efficient, and comfortable. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 4‐3 4.2 Relevant Circulation and Mobility Element Goals and Policies The Circulation and Mobility Element’s purposes are to: (1) directly relate to the Land Use Element such that any changes to land use and growth are also reflected in changes to provide adequate circulation and transportation facilities; and (2) address relevant issues regarding the adequacy of current infrastructure and related services, identify circulation problems related to these, and resolve them in a cost efficient manner. CME GOAL 4.0: Provide efficient and accessible modes of pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian transportation and improved facilities and amenities. Circulation and Mobility Element Policy 4.5: Ensure that pedestrian sidewalks, trails, and bikeways are safe environments through the use of crime prevention‐oriented trail design features, lighting where appropriate, pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements at‐grade rail crossings, access for emergency vehicles, and links to roadway signal system. The Specific Plan clearly defines pedestrian linkages and maintains and improves existing pedestrian sidewalks on the Orange‐Olive and Grove Avenue frontages. The Specific Plan provides residential units in a location with direct linkages to the City maintained Schaffer Park (located immediately south of the Specific Plan area) through connectivity of the sidewalk system. In addition, lighting is used at entries, courtyards, pedestrian walkways, and other areas utilized by pedestrians. The placement and orientation of the Phase II residences creates a safe environment by directing pedestrian residential ingress and egress to the sidewalks on Grove Avenue. 4.3 Relevant Growth Management Element Goals and Policies The Growth Management Element addresses policies for the provision of traffic improvements that are necessary to continue orderly growth and development in the City. The policies, plans, and programs outlined are designed to ensure that needed roadway improvements are completed with respect to both new development as well as future infill development. The Growth Management Element mandates that growth and development be based on the City’s ability to provide an adequate circulation system, and that it meets the requirements of the voter‐approved Revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance (Measure M). There are no Growth Management Element goals or policies that specifically apply. 4.4 Relevant Natural Resources Element Goals and Policies The Natural Resources Element establishes programs and policies to address: (1) preservation and use of open space, (2) renewable and non‐renewable environmental conservation, and (3) parks and recreation. The Natural Resources Element’s scope covers preservation of renewable and non‐ renewable resources, managed production of services, and outdoor recreational use. NRE GOAL 2.0: Protect air, water, and energy resources from pollution and overuse. Natural Resources Element Policy 2.2: Encourage sustainable building and site design for new construction and renovation projects. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 4‐4 Design and construction of the Specific Plan area incorporates green building features, including low‐ flow water fixtures, window locations which provide natural light and reduce reliance on artificial light, pre‐plumbing for solar equipment and panels, and utilization of irrigation controllers and self‐closing nozzles on hoses. These elements ensure consistency with the General Plan’s Natural Resources Element to protect energy and water resources from overuse through their implementation within the Specific Plan area. 4.5 Relevant Public Safety Element Goals and Policies The Public Safety Element covers natural environmental hazards such as geologic and seismic activity, landslides and rock falls, flood hazards, and fire hazards. It also covers human‐caused hazards affecting land use policy such as hazardous materials, urban fires, aircraft operations, homeland security, and crime/urban design as a crime prevention tool. PSE GOAL 7.0: Improve community safety and reduce opportunities for criminal activity. PUBLIC SAFETY Policy 7.3: Maximize natural surveillance through physical design features, including, but not limited to, visible entryways from surrounding structures and businesses; well‐ defined and visible walkways and gates; well‐lighted driveways, walkways, and exteriors; and landscaping that preserves or enhances visibility. The Specific Plan clearly defines pedestrian linkages, such as walkways. In addition, appropriate lighting is used at entries, courtyards, pedestrian walkways, and other areas utilized by pedestrians as detailed in Appendix C. Also, street lighting constructed along private drive aisles and along street frontages, adjacent the Specific Plan area creates visibly lit areas. The placement and type of street lighting matches existing street lighting along Orange‐Olive Road and Grove Avenue. The presence of housing units on Grove also has the potential to maximize safety at the park due to orientation of the buildings and “eyes” on the street/park. The internal streets are designed to ensure fire and other emergency response vehicles are able to access all structures to ensure adequate response to potential emergencies. 4.6 Relevant Noise Element Goals and Policies The Noise Element addresses the potential for excessive or unusual noise to have an adverse impact on human health and welfare. The policies, plans, and programs outlined are designed to minimize the effects of human‐caused noise in the community and to improve residents’ quality of life by regulating and reducing noise. This element is particularly important in residential areas and near noise‐sensitive land uses such as residences, hospitals, schools, and convalescent and day care facilities. NE GOAL 1.0: Promote a pattern of land uses compatible with current and future noise levels. NOISE Policy 1.3: Incorporate design features into residential and mixed‐use projects that can be used to shield residents from excessive noise. The proposed Specific Plan generates additional traffic and may alter noise levels in the surrounding areas. The project also proposes new residential development in an area with the potential for a high level of ambient noise. To assess the level of impact and also noise/land use compatibility considerations, a noise study was conducted for Phase I and Phase II. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 4‐5 The Noise Element requires all new residential developments adjacent to arterials and secondary roadways to be provided with sound walls to achieve desired noise and land use compatibility. The proposed developments include a six‐foot perimeter wall along the Orange‐Olive frontage to attenuate sound as Orange‐Olive Road is a secondary‐arterial roadway1 conducive to higher traffic volumes and there is an existing Metrolink and freight railroad corridor located on the western side of Orange‐Olive Road. Therefore, the wall is needed to address train and vehicle noise. Variable wall heights, ranging from 3’6” to 6’0”, are proposed on the Grove Avenue frontage, as it is a collector street with lower traffic volumes. The proposed development also includes installation of noise‐attenuating windows on the second floor of units fronting Orange‐Olive Road to ensure City noise standards are met. A mitigation measure included in the subsequent MND requires all Phase II residential units to be provided with a means of mechanical ventilation, pursuant to the California Building Code, to allow for occupancy with windows closed. Therefore, design features have been incorporated into the project to ensure residents are shielded from excessive noise. 4.7 Relevant Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element Goals and Policies The Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element is not state‐mandated, but is important because it provides guidelines to preserve the resources that are important to the history and culture of the City of Orange. It helps provide guidance in developing and implementing programs that ensure the identification, designation, and protection of cultural resources in the City’s development process, and identifies ways in which the City can partner with private property owners in support of historic preservation. There are no existing structures that can be preserved or rehabilitated, and the Specific Plan area is not located within an existing historic overlay district and does not include features or construction activities that would result in significant adverse impacts to any contributing resources to a historical district or to the nearby Eichler Historic District. There are no Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation goals or policies that specifically apply. 4.8 Relevant Infrastructure Element Goals and Policies INF GOAL 1.0: Ensure water, sewer, and storm drain systems that meet the needs of residents and businesses. INF Policy 1.6: Require that new developments fund fair‐share costs associated with City provision of water, sewer, and storm drain service and are consistent with City and service provider plans to complete needed improvements and funding capacity for such improvements. The development of the Specific Plan includes the necessary infrastructure onsite to connect to the City’s existing infrastructure system. As indicated in Chapter 8.0 of this Specific Plan, existing utility systems are sufficient to meet the needs of the new residents of the proposed development. Original drainage flows to the southwest corner of the Specific Plan area and Phase I and Phase II development does not increase runoff into the storm drain system; therefore, upgrades to the existing storm drain 1 City of Orange General Plan, Circulation and Mobility Element, Figure CM‐2: Master Plan of Streets and Highways. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/562/General‐Plan‐‐‐Circulation‐and‐Mobility‐Element‐PDF AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 4‐6 facilities are not required. Water is provided through a standard minimum eight‐inch diameter pipeline for Phase I and a standard minimum 12‐inch diameter pipeline for Phase II; no new water delivery facilities are required as the current water supply is adequate. Sewer is provided through basic sewer collection pipeline; no new wastewater treatment or delivery facilities are required as the current system is adequate to accommodate the Specific Plan. All applicable development impact fees required to fund fair‐share costs associated with the provision of City utility services are paid in accordance with Orange Municipal Code at the time of building permit issuance. 4.9 Relevant Urban Design Element Goals and Policies UD GOAL 6.0: Encourage contextually appropriate infill development projects and property renovations. UD Policy 6.1: Encourage consistent high quality design of development projects, and provide development standards that ensure building and site design that is well integrated with infrastructure and circulation systems. UD Policy 6.2: Ensure that new infill development contributes positively to the quality of the surrounding corridor or neighborhood, including the potential to provide additional park space, and minimize the visibility of on‐site parking. Orange‐Olive Specific Plan provides a new housing product at the periphery of an existing residential neighborhood containing both apartments and single‐family homes. The Specific Plan incorporates a contextually appropriate density of 10.9 du/ac, well below the 15 du/ac allowed by the General Plan. The proposed density allows for a greater number of units and serves as a transitional residential development between the lower‐density surroundings and the higher density that the General Plan allows. The proposed architectural styles for the 57 single‐family detached homes draws from Irving Gill’s designs and feature architectural elements inspired by the Walter L. Dodge House, Horatio West Court, and various cottages designed by Gill. These architectural elements include the use of arches, flat rooflines, rectangular massing, and light exterior walls. The architectural styles and design standards identified in the Specific Plan implement high quality design and ensure that the new community is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods and nearby mid‐century modern Fairmeadow Eichler Historic District. The project site connects to the City’s existing utilities infrastructure. Phase I of the Specific Plan continues to take access from Orange‐Olive Road and Phase II reduces the number of curb breaks on‐ site from five to one‐taking access from Grove Avenue. Neither phase conflicts with the existing circulation system. The Specific Plan and phased developments provide more parking than is required per minimum parking requirements for single‐family residential or multi‐family residential development specified in the Orange Municipal Code. All parking spaces are located on‐site and screened from off‐site areas either by landscape planters along the private drive aisle or by their location within the common motor court areas. 4.10 Relevant Economic Development Element Goals and Policies The Economic Development Element outlines strategies that allow the City to attract new businesses, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses, and foster employment growth and economic stability. It also establishes and reinforces the City’s image and identity within the region and AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 4‐7 identifies future infrastructure and capital facilities investments necessary to foster new economic development opportunities. There are no Economic Development goals or policies that specifically apply. However, investment in redevelopment of a constrained infill property and providing increased housing options in the Orange‐ Olive area improve the character of the area and attract investment. 4.11 Relevant Housing Element Goals and Policies The Housing Element addresses adequate housing needs and opportunities for present and future residents. The goals, objectives, and action programs are based on the community’s housing needs, available resources, and constraints and opportunities for housing production and preservation. HE POLICY ACTION 5: Development of Housing for Large Families. This policy is intended to encourage developers/builders to incorporate larger bedroom counts (3 or more bedrooms) to accommodate the needs of larger families and reduce incidents of overcrowding in the existing housing stock. The development of the Specific Plan includes units that are all two stories and combine three bedroom floor plans with office, loft, and/or den space/fourth bedroom option, and four bedroom plans. HE POLICY ACTION 7: Facilitate Infill Construction. The City has a 2014‐2021 RHNA need of 363 housing units for Extremely Low‐, Very Low‐, Low and Moderate‐Income households. The City has limited vacant land available for residential development and limited vacant land zoned at densities to support affordable housing. Therefore, the City will continue to encourage infill development within feasible development sites for homeownership and rental units. The City will continue to facilitate infill development through implementation of its General Plan and Zoning Code, which allows for higher density housing in appropriate areas of the City where potential exists for site redevelopment. In addition, the City will encourage compatible residential development integrated into existing neighborhoods and districts where appropriate. The development of the Specific Plan provides an infill development opportunity that helps that City to fulfill this goal. The Specific Plan also encourages compatible residential development that will be integrated into the existing neighborhood. The units may or may not fall into the affordable housing category. However, the project provides a unique project type that is accessible to the local community. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐1 CHAPTER 5.0 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 5.1 Purpose and Intent This section has been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 65450, et seq. and Title 17 of the Orange Municipal Code. This section sets forth the standards for development within the Specific Plan Area. Application of these regulations is specifically intended to provide the most appropriate use of the land, create a harmonious relationship among nearby land uses, and protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. This Specific Plan shall be used in conjunction with all other relevant City of Orange adopted plans and ordinances, including:  Orange 2010 General Plan  Orange Municipal Code Title 17 Zoning Code  City of Orange Landscape Standards and Specifications, revised 2016, including Title IX. Water Efficient Landscape, revised January 2016 5.2 General Provisions 5.2.1 Applicability The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan shall constitute the legal zoning for the project site. No construction, modification, addition, placement or installation of any building or structure shall occur, nor shall any new use commence on any lot, on or after the effective date of this Specific Plan, except in conformity with the provisions of this Specific Plan. Actions deemed to be consistent with the Specific Plan shall be determined to be consistent with the City of Orange General Plan, as mandated in California Government Code Section 65454. The Specific Plan does not convey any rights not otherwise granted under the provisions and procedures contained in the Zoning Code and other applicable ordinances, except as specifically provided herein. Any issue not specifically covered in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the Zoning Code and/or Orange Municipal Code, or to interpretation by the Community Development Director if not specifically covered in the City’s regulations. In cases where development regulations and standards set forth in this Specific Plan are inconsistent with the Zoning Code, the Specific Plan shall prevail. The provisions of this Specific Plan shall also prevail where there are inconsistencies between this Specific Plan and other City ordinances, rules and regulations. However, the provisions of this Specific Plan shall not prevail should there be an inconsistency between the Specific Plan and the City’s General Plan. 5.2.2 Severability In the event that any regulation, condition, program, portion or policy of this Specific Plan or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed separate, distinct and independent provisions and shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Specific Plan or applications thereof which can be implemented without the invalid provision or application. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐2 5.2.3 Interpretation The City of Orange Community Development Director shall resolve any ambiguities related to the implementation of the provisions of this Specific Plan. Such interpretations shall take into account the stated goals and intent of the Specific Plan. Any interpretation made by the Community Development Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless appealed to the City Council. 5.2.4 Definitions Unless otherwise specified herein, terms used in this document shall have the same definitions provided in the Zoning Code (Title 17 City of Orange Municipal Code). 5.3 Land Use/Establishment of Zoning 5.3.1 Permitted Uses The Permitted Uses shall be the same as those identified as permissible in the R‐3 (Multiple Family Residential) zoning classification described in Orange Municipal Code Section 17.14. 5.3.2 Prohibited Uses All uses that are not otherwise identified in this section shall be prohibited. 5.3.3 Temporary Uses Temporary onsite building(s), structures, trailers, etc. during project construction and for the purpose of project grand opening and preliminary sales are permitted. Temporary uses allowed under this provision shall be removed from the site within six months from issuance of building permit finals or within six months from the time of final sale (respectively). 5.4 Development Standards The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan allows for a unique residential use within the Specific Plan Area. As such, the following regulations are similar to those standards identified within the R‐3 Zoning Designation, but additional flexibility from some standards is incorporated to allow for the proposed product type and to enhance the design of the Specific Plan community. 5.4.1 General Site Development Standards  All lighting shall be designed and located so as to confine direct rays onto the premises.  Trash receptacles shall be properly maintained and screened from view of public right of ways. Phases I and II intend to utilize trash valet service with waste collection services provided by the City’s trash hauler. Separate trash receptacles for solid waste, recyclables, and organics recycling are placed in the areas shown in Figure 3‐3 Phase I Site Plan and Figure 3‐7 Phase II Conceptual Site Plan at a specified day for collection. The trash receptacles are pulled to the private drive aisle to be emptied by the City’s trash hauler and conveyed to the appropriate landfill. The trash receptacles are then returned to their designated areas by the City’s trash hauler. This service is AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐3 provided to the Specific Plan development for a fee, which is the responsibility of the project’s HOA. 5.4.2 Density The Land Use Element of the Orange General Plan (adopted March 2010, and amended in 2015) determines the location and type of new development and redevelopment projects in the City. In addition, the Land Use Element establishes the range of density or intensity of development permitted for each land use designation. Within the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan, the following General Plan Land Use Designation and corresponding density or intensity apply (Table 5‐1) and are described below: Table 5‐1 General Plan Land Use Designation for Orange‐Olive Specific Plan General Plan Land Use Density or Intensity Range Low‐Medium Density Residential (LMDR) 6.1‐15.0 du/ac The LMDR designation provides for both detached and attached single‐family homes on smaller lots, as well as duplexes and some mobile homes, multi‐family townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Project density within the Specific Plan is determined by dividing the residential units (e.g. 25 residential units) by the net site acreage (e.g. 2.33 net acres). The densities for each phase of the Specific Plan development are listed below. Phase I Allowable Density: 25 ÷ 2.33 = 10.7 du/ac = density. Phase II Allowable Density: 32 ÷ 2.9 = 11.0 du/ac = density. Total Specific Plan Allowable Density: 57 ÷ 5.23 = 10.9 du/ac = density. 5.4.3 Permitted Buildings Heights The maximum building height within the Specific Plan shall not exceed two (2) stories or 27’‐6” feet from natural grade, whichever is greater. Chimneys and other similar devices may exceed the height requirement. 5.4.4 Floor Area Ratio/Lot Coverage The Floor Area Ratio for the overall Orange‐Olive Specific Plan shall not exceed 0.65 for the project site. Floor Area Ratio is defined as building area divided by net site area. Building square footage shall include garages. Porches and patios shall be excluded from the building square footage calculation. Any increase in floor area ratio above 0.65 shall require a Specific Plan Amendment. The Lot Coverage for the overall Orange‐Olive Specific Plan shall not exceed 40%. Lot coverage is defined as building footprint including garage area divided by the net lot area. Any increase above 40% shall require a Specific Plan Amendment. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐4 Table 5‐2 Allowable Lot Coverage/Floor Area Ratio Requirements FAR (Building Area/Net Lot Area) Not to Exceed 0.65 Lot Coverage (Building Footprints/Net Lot Area) Not to Exceed 40% FAR and lot coverage apply to the total project site but do not apply to individual residential units. 5.4.5 Minimum Floor Area per Unit The minimum floor area of habitable space for each unit shall be no less than 900 square feet for three bedroom units and 1,050 square feet for four bedroom units. The minimum floor area shall not include garage area, eaves or open patio or porch areas. 5.4.6 Setbacks Perimeter setbacks shall comply with the following standards: Table 5‐3 Building Setbacks Perimeter Setbacks Minimum Requirement Orange-Olive Road 17.9 feet2 Grove Avenue 10 feet Northerly Property Line Boundary 6 feet Southerly Property Line Boundary 8 feet Easterly Property Line Boundary 11.5 feet 5.4.7 Minimum Distance Between Buildings and Walls All residential units including attached garages shall maintain a minimum separation of six (6) feet from the nearest wall of another residential unit including attached garage, or portion thereof, and from the perimeter wall. 5.4.8 Additions and Accessory Structures Additions that increase the interior square footage of the units shall be prohibited. Accessory structures such as sheds shall also be prohibited. 2 Private open space and a six foot high perimeter wall, as shown on Figures 6‐5a and 6‐5b, shall be allowed within the Orange‐Olive Road perimeter setback area. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐5 5.4.9 Patio Covers Patio covers are allowed in private rear yards, so long as they are 10 feet in height or less, maintain a five‐foot setback from the private rear yard area of any other unit, and comply with Building and Fire Code. In addition, if a patio cover is detached, it shall be located at least six feet from any other structure. 5.5 Landscaping, Walls and Fencing, Open Space 5.5.1 General With exception to modifications identified within this chapter, all landscaping and irrigation systems and plans shall conform to applicable sections of Title 17 of the Orange Municipal Code. All landscape drawings and plans shall be prepared by a California licensed landscape architect. A licensed landscape architect shall oversee installation of plantings, irrigation, and hardscape materials within the Specific Plan Area. 5.5.2 Walls and Fences Fencing shall require review and approval by the Community Development Director and shall comply with the following:  Perimeter walls and walls along the main drive aisle shall not exceed six (6) feet in height and shall be of a material that is compatible with the building’s architecture. Walls shall be located in areas indicated in Figure 5‐1a Wall and Fence Plan – Phase I and Figure 5‐1b Wall and Fence Plan – Phase II.  The Grove Avenue frontage incorporates varied wall heights, ranging from 3’‐6” to 6’‐0” to create a more pedestrian‐oriented street scene. The low‐lying walls are limited to the Grove Avenue frontage and shall be of a material that is compatible with the building’s architecture and consistent with the pedestrian character of Grove Avenue. The 6’‐0” walls on the Grove Avenue frontage are limited to the areas of private yards in order to screen trash receptables for the fronting residences.  The Orange Olive Road frontage permits for a 6’‐0” high perimeter wall and private yard areas to encroach into the Orange Olive Road setback, as depicted in Figure 5‐1a Wall and Fence Plan – Phase I and Figure 5‐1b Wall and Fence Plan – Phase II. Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 (1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(4)(5)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(24)(21)(22)(23)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)98765214311131415162112191820222810172425262723TE. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkWALL LEGENDExisting Perimeter Walls & Pilaster(s) to Remain, if possible.6'-0" High Perimeter Stucco Wall with Flat Stucco Cap.(Color to complement Architecture)3'-6" High Stucco Patio Wall with Precast Concrete Cap.5'-6" High Vinyl Fence (Tan Color).5'-0" High Perimeter T.S. Metal Fence (Black Color).6'-3" High Stucco Pilaster Flat Stucco Cap.(Color to complement Architecture)±5'-6" High Vinyl Private Yard Gate (Tan / White Color)3'-6" High Metal Patio Gate.±6'-0" High potential monument wall with project name / lettering attached towall, (stucco to complement Architecture with precast cap) - per future submittal.Schematic Wall & Fence Plan“Cohen Property” - Orange, CADavid CohenProject No.: PRS01-DDate: May 29, 20205th - City Submittal140'Scale: 1" = 20'020'10'234567256437* Conceptual image onlyExisting East PL wall to be enhanced as needed to a Min. Height of 6'-0"88Existing North PL Wall to remain and protect in place.Existing Wall, Steps Down towards R/WExisting Wall, Steps Down towards R/WROW / P.L.ROW / P.L.POTENTIALMONUMENT WALLS2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO)LJXUHE:DOODQG)HQFH3ODQ3KDVH,, AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐8  All residential units shall be separated by fencing not to exceed six (6) feet in height constructed of a material that is compatible with the building’s architecture. Fencing shall be located in areas indicated in Figure 5‐1a Wall and Fence Plan – Phase I and Figure 5‐1b Wall and Fence Plan – Phase II.  Patio walls shall be 3.5 feet in height and constructed of a material that is compatible with the building’s architecture. Patio walls shall be located in areas indicated in Figure 5‐1a Wall and Fence Plan – Phase I and Figure 5‐1b Wall and Fence Plan – Phase II. 5.5.3 Open Space Usable Outdoor Open Space  Usable open space, for the purpose of this section, shall mean an open area or an indoor or outdoor recreational facility, which is designed and intended to be used for outdoor living and/or recreation.  Usable open space shall not include any portion of off‐street parking spaces, streets, driveways, turnaround areas, required front setback area and slope areas exceeding five percent (20:1 gradient). Requirements  The minimum amount of private usable open space provided per unit shall be 300 square feet, directly accessible from the corresponding residential unit.  Landscaping in common areas shall consist of drought‐tolerant groundcover and shrubs, palms, specimen and canopy trees, and smaller trees. Common area landscaping shall be managed and maintained by the HOA.  Landscaping in private open space will be at the discretion of the homeowner. Homeowners will be required to adhere to the landscaping guidelines provided in the Homeowners Association’s CC&Rs. The Phase II development’s areas of open space, designated use, and maintenance responsibility are outlined in Figure 5‐2 Conceptual Open Space Plan – Phase II. 5.6 Parking and Lighting 5.6.1 Required Parking For each unit within the Specific Plan, a total of 2.88 parking spaces shall be provided (per unit), of which two spaces per unit must be enclosed garage spaces and 0.88 spaces per unit shall be guest parking. The guest spaces shall be provided in surface parking areas and along the main drive aisle, and evenly distributed throughout the Specific Plan Area. 5.6.2 Lighting Design Standards All exterior lighting shall comply with City of Orange standards for nighttime illumination. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐9 5.7 Development Provisions Comparison A comparison of the required development standards for the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan and the provisions for the R‐3 District contained in Chapter 17.14 (Residential Districts) of the Orange Zoning Code is summarized on the following page in Table 5‐4. This table also includes the standards proposed for Phase I and Phase II of the Specific Plan. Where Table 5‐4 denotes a proposed development standard that does not differentiate between Phase I and Phase II, the standard is applied to both phases of development. Where Table 5‐4 does not denote a development standard for either Phase I or Phase II, the City’s Zoning Code would apply. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐10 Table 5‐4 Orange‐Olive Specific Plan Development Standards Comparison Development Standards Orange‐Olive Specific Plan R‐3 District Proposed Developments Maximum Units Per Lot Phase I: 35 Units Phase II: 44 Units Per General Plan: LMDR 6.1‐15.0 du/ac Phase I: 25 Units Phase II: 32 Units Minimum Lot Area* No Requirement 7,000 sf interior; 8,000 corner Phase I: 101,494 SF Phase II: 126,320 SF Minimum Lot Frontage* No Requirement 70 feet interior; 80 feet corner Phase I: 242.5 feet Phase II: 282.6 feet Minimum Lot Depth* No Requirement 100 feet Phase I: 400.9 feet Phase II: 427.7 feet Minimum Parking 2.88 spaces/unit (min 2 garage spaces/unit and 0.88 spaces/unit guest) Development Size—3 units to 50 unitsα If unenclosed res. parking is provided: If enclosed res. parking is provided: 3 Bdrms—2.6 sp/unit 3 Bdrms—2.6 sp/unit Ea. Add’l bdrm > 3—0.4 sp/bdrm/unit Ea. Add’l bdrm > 3— 0.5 sp/bdrm/unit αrefer to Sec. 17.34.060 for guest space reqs. Phase I: 72 total spaces 50 garaged/covered 22 guest Phase II: 92 total spaces 64 garaged/covered 28 guest Minimum Distance Between Buildings 6 feet 25 feet from view allowing windows in 1 structure to facing windows in any adjacent structure. 15 feet minimum between solid facing walls, or when windows are located on only one facing wall. 6 feet Minimum Floor Area Per Units 3 BR unit ‐ 900 sf; 4 BR unit 1,050 sf 3 BR unit ‐ 900 sf ; 4 BR unit 1,050 sf Phase I: 3 BR unit – 2,412 sf**; 4 BR unit1 2,519 sf** Phase II: 3 BR unit – 2,325 sf**; 4 BR unit 2,517 sf** Maximum Height 27’‐6” feet/2 stories 32 feet/2 stories; 20 feet/1 story within 70 feet of single‐family residential uses 27’‐6” feet/2 stories Maximum Lot Coverage 40% (total SP area) 45% for 2‐story structures, 55% for single‐ story structures Phase I: 32.1% Phase II: 30.6% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.65 (total SP area) No Requirement Phase I: 0.60 Phase II: 0.49 Minimum Usable Open Space Per Unit 300 square feet 250 square feet (private and common open space, plus minimum dimensions) Phase I: Private: 609 sf per unit2 Phase II: Private: 690 sf per unit3 Common: 610 sf per unit4 Minimum Storage Area Per Unit 120 cubic feet Storage area must be in addition to cabinets and closets typically found within a unit 120 cubic feet. Storage area must be in addition to cabinets and closets typically found within a unit (such as kitchen and bathroom cabinets, clothes and linen closets). 120 cubic feet. Storage area must be‐ in addition to cabinets and closets typically found within a unit (such as kitchen and bathroom cabinets, clothes and linen closets). AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 5‐11 Development Standards Orange‐Olive Specific Plan R‐3 District Proposed Developments (such as kitchen and bathroom cabinets, clothes and linen closets). Perimeter Setbacks Orange‐Olive Road 17.9 feet 15 feet 17.9 feet Grove Avenue 10 feet 15 feet 10 feet North Property Line Boundary*** 6 feet 5 feet Phase I: 6 feet Phase II: 10 feet South Property Line Boundary*** 8 feet 5 feet Phase I: 8 feet Phase II: Refer to Grove Ave setback East Property Line Boundary*** 11.5 feet 10 Feet Phase I: 11.5 feet Phase II: 11.5 feet * The Specific Plan area is two common lot areas, defined as Phase I and Phase II. Each residential unit located within each phase is a condominium unit and not located on a separate lot. The lot area, lot frontage, and lot depth requirements apply to lots created or proposed for creation as a development standard. The total areas shown under the Proposed Developments are based on the common lot for each phase of development. ** Square footages are inclusive of garage square footage. ***Refer to Figures 3‐3 and 3‐7 for identification of Phase I and II north, south, and east property boundaries. 1 Four‐bedroom units under Phase I are options. 2 Average value per unit. Total private open space area for Phase I is 15,223 sf (refer to Figure 3‐3) 3 Average value per unit. Total private open space area for Phase II is 22, 090 sf (refer to Figure 5‐2) 4 Average value per unit. Total common open space area for Phase II is 19,535 sf (refer to Figure 5‐2) TE. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of Work26+2$&20021/$1'6&$3(+2$0$,17$,1('3HUYLRXV7DNHRIIVI26+2$352*5$00('&20021$5($+2$0$,17$,1('0LQC'LPHQVLRQ7DNHRIIVI26&,7<3$5.:$<6/$1'6&$3(+2$0$,17$,1('3HUYLRXV7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27%</277DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('2635,9$7(<$5'/277DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI23(163$&(/(*(1'2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVI2635,9$7(<$5'/27+20(2:1(5,167$//(' 0$,17$,1('7DNHRIIVIOPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:TOTAL HOA COMMON OPEN SPACE = 19,535͒6)(17,972 SF + 1,563 SF)TOTAL PRIVATE YARD OPEN SPACE= 22,090 SFTOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED= 41,625 SF(Not Including City Parkways)Schematic Open Space Plan³&RKHQ3URSHUW\´2UDQJH&$David CohenProject No.: PRS01-DDate: May 29, 20205th - City Submittal40'Scale: 1" = 20'020'10'ROW / P.L.ROW / P.L.)LJXUH&RQFHSWXDO2SHQ6SDFH3ODQ3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 6‐1 CHAPTER 6.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 6.1 Introduction This chapter provides design guidelines, which establishes the overall design theme for the development of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan. The design guidelines encourage the highest level of design quality and creativity. The design guidelines contained in this section shall be used as a guiding principle for the development of the Specific Plan Area. The City of Orange will utilize these guidelines to evaluate development within the Specific Plan Area. Guidelines for site planning, architecture, and landscape architecture are provided below. 6.2 Site Planning  The arrangement of the building, parking and circulation areas should recognize the particular characteristics of the project site and should relate to the surrounding built environment.  Buffers from adjacent properties through the use of landscaping, setbacks and/or appropriate fencing should be encouraged.  Pedestrian linkages (e.g., pedestrian walkways, landscape areas, gardens, outdoor common area, etc.) within the project site and to existing pedestrian networks are encouraged. 6.3 Architectural Design 6.3.1 Architectural Character The architectural character for the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan draws from Irving Gill’s designs and feature architectural elements inspired by the Walter L. Dodge House, Horatio West Court, and various cottages designed by Gill. These architectural elements include the use of arches, flat rooflines, rectangular massing, and light exterior walls. This particular style offers opportunities to differentiate wall planes and rooflines. The building elevations should include:  Casement windows  Cubic or rectangular massing  Ground level arches  Bay windows  Parapets  Corner window arrangement  Stucco and wood trim treatment  Boxed in window treatments AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 6‐2 General Architectural Guidelines  The architectural style should consider compatibility with surrounding development and draw elements from the area.  Building(s) should have articulation and projections with architectural elements and details.  Recessed fenestration and simple door/window detailing should be incorporated at the building façade to reflect and complement the architectural style.  The size and location of doors and windows should relate to the scale and proportions of the building elevation on which they are located.  Design features should be fully articulated on all sides of the building.  All windows should receive exterior trim as characterized by this Gill‐inspired style and be dual glazed. Windows should utilize clear, translucent glass and not use highly reflective material. 6.3.2 Orientation  Building orientation should consider the project site’s characteristics such as the property depth and wide street frontages.  Buildings and main entrances should be oriented towards the street and sidewalk to establish a strong tie to the street frontage.  Building orientation and window placement should preserve privacy for adjacent residential uses. 6.3.3 Building Massing  Architectural features should be incorporated into the building design to eliminate a box‐like appearance. Varying rooflines and articulated building elevations should be incorporated into the building design to soften the scale and mass of the building  The scale and mass of building(s) should be reduced through changes in horizontal plane, materials or color.  The building entry(s) should be clearly identifiable. Use of large overhangs, recess projections, columns, arches and other distinctive materials and colors to articulate entries are encouraged. Figure 6‐1 Elevation Plan 1 ‐ Phase I through Figure 6‐3 Elevation Plan 3 ‐ Phase I illustrate the general massing of the buildings for Phase I, and Figure 6‐4 Elevation Plan 1A ‐ Phase II through Figure 6‐14a Elevation Plan 3DX ‐ Phase II for Phase II. 6.3.4 Color and Materials  Building colors and materials should be of subtle natural tones with contrasting colors used for accents and details.  Colors and materials should be consistently applied and should complement adjacent materials.  Exterior materials and architectural details should be simple, complementary and stylistically consistent. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 6‐3  Material changes not occurring at changes in plane appear “tacked‐on” and are strongly discouraged.  Building materials should be high quality, durable and resistant to damage, defacing, and weathering. Appropriate building materials include concrete, stone, metal, stucco, wood, glass and/or other similar composites. These materials may be used in any combination. Figure 6‐15a Street Scene – Phase I and Figure 6‐15b Street Scene – Phase II illustrate a typical street scene. Figure 6-1: Elevations Plan 1 - Phase ISagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 Figure 6-2: Elevations Plan 2 - Phase ISagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 Figure 6-3: Elevations Plan 3 - Phase ICity of OrangeEnvironmental Advisors, LLCSagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"38'-6"38'-6"36'-6"36'-6"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Low Profile Tile Roof2x6 Exposed Wood Truss TailsStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Eave, Smooth FinishSmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsTiered Stucco CapFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1A ELEVATIONSMODERN SPANISH024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ$3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-5"38'-6"36'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Low Profile Tile Roof2x6 Exposed Wood Truss TailsStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Eave, Smooth FinishSmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsTiered Stucco CapFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1A-X ELEVATIONSMODERN SPANISH024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION)LJXUHD(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ$;3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"36'-0"35'-2"35'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1B ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ%3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"37'-0"34'-10"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1B-X ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION)LJXUHD(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ%;3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"39'-6"39'-6"37'-4"37'-4"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown DashedDecorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill capArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1C ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ&3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"39'-6"37'-4"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill capArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1C-X ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION)LJXUHD(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ&;3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"36'-0"35'-2"35'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1D ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"LEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ'3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"37'-0"35'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1D-X ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION)LJXUHD(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ';3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-2"43'-3"43'-3"40'-2"40'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Low Profile Tile Roof2x6 Exposed Wood Truss TailsStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Eave, Smooth FinishSmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsTiered Stucco CapFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2A ELEVATIONSMODERN SPANISH024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ$3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"40'-9"40'-9"40'-2"40'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2B ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ%3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"42'-7"42'-7"41'-2"41'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill capParapet WallArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2C ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ&3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±24'-11"40'-9"40'-9"40'-2"40'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2D ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"LEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ'3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-4"59'-6"59'-6"26'-9"26'-9"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3B ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ%3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-0"59'-6"59'-6"27'-4"27'-4"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3BX ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUHD(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ%;3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±25'-6"61'-3"59'-6"26'-9"26'-9"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill capArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3C ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ&3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±25'-6"63'-0"63'-0"28'-9"28'-9"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill capArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3CX ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUHD(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ&;3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"59'-6"59'-6"26'-3"26'-3"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3D ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUH(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ'3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"60'-6"60'-6"29'-3"29'-3"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address SignArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3DX ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"024 8Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION)LJXUHD(OHYDWLRQV3ODQ';3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020Figure 6-15a - Street Scene (Orange-Olive Road) - Phase I A1.4STREET SCENEE. GROVE AVENUE0 8 16 24Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCITRUS GROVE# 2018-0730Cohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Plot Date:June 1, 2020Pre Submittal :ENLARGED NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRYSTREET SCENE AT E. GROVE AVE.)LJXUHE6WUHHW6FHQH2UDQJH2OLYH6WUHHWDQG*URYH$YHQXH3KDVH,,2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 6‐27 6.3.5 Screening/Mechanical Equipment  Ground and roof mounted equipment should not be visible from adjacent buildings at‐grade. Equipment should be screened from view of public streets and nearby buildings on all sides with landscaping and/or architectural elements.  Equipment screening should be compatible with the architecture, materials and colors of the building. 6.4 Landscape Architecture Guidelines This section contains the landscape design concepts, guidelines and special treatments for the implementation of landscaping within the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan area. The landscape design concepts and guidelines are intended to:  Contribute to the enhancement of community character.  Create a landscaped environment that enhances the pedestrian experience along the street frontages.  Provide a plant palette that is sensitive to the Orange environment and complements the architecture.  Comply with City of Orange Municipal Code requirements. 6.4.1 Landscape Concept Plan Landscape Concept Plans for the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan are illustrated in Figure 6‐16a Conceptual Landscape Plan ‐ Phase I and Figure 6‐16b Conceptual Landscape Plan ‐ Phase II, as well as, Figure 6‐ 17a Conceptual Planting Plan ‐ Phase I and Figure 6‐17b Conceptual Planting Plan ‐ Phase II, and includes the following guidelines:  Accent trees, shrubs, and groundcover should complement the architectural design of the project.  Landscaping should enhance the quality of the project by framing and softening the appearance of buildings, screening undesirable views and buffering the site from adjacent uses.  All areas not covered by buildings, walkways, driveways, parking spaces, and service areas, should be landscaped.  Landscaped areas should generally incorporate planting utilizing a three‐tiered system: 1) trees, 2) shrubs and vines, and 3) groundcover.  Layered trees, shrubs, plants and decorative hardscape features complementary to the site and architectural style are encouraged.  Planters and pots placed in building recesses and adjacent to blank walls are encouraged to provide visual interest. Planter and pot materials should complement the building architecture AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 6‐28 and should incorporate irrigation systems as required based on type of plant material. Drainage for all the planters and pots shall be controlled so as not to create “stains” on the building or decorative pavement, or to create standing water.  Landscaping should be placed so that it does not interfere with lighting or restrict access to utilities or emergency apparatus.  Landscaping should be complementary in scale with adjacent buildings and be of appropriate size at maturity.  Textured paving materials suitable for use in pedestrian areas such as pedestrian walkways, the main entry driveway and courtyard areas. 6.4.2 Development Edge and Buffer Treatments  Landscaping should be used to define edges and create a pleasant pedestrian experience along the Orange‐Olive street frontage. 6.4.3 Entry Landscape Treatment and Monumentation  Pedestrian and vehicular entry areas should be enhanced with ornamental landscaping, decorative paving, and monument signage, where applicable.  Entry monumentation should be appropriately scaled and complementary to the landscape and architectural design of the building. 6.4.4 Streetscape Figure 6‐16a Conceptual Landscape Plan ‐ Phase I and Figure 6‐16b Conceptual Landscape Plan ‐ Phase II, illustrate the landscaping along Orange‐Olive Road. The following guidelines apply:  New streetscape improvements should be complementary in design, scale and palette with existing streetscape elements.  Street trees should not be placed in a manner that obstructs pedestrian or recreational movement, or visually obstructs entryways and signs. Street trees shall be consistent with the City’s Street Tree Master Plan. 6.4.5 Lighting Design The Specific Plan area’s lighting is subject to the following design guidelines. Lighting for the Phase II development is shielded to prevent/minimize light spillover onto neighboring properties. Conceptual locations, lighting specifications, and photometric values for the Phase II development are depicted in Figure 6‐18 Conceptual Lighting Plan – Phase II and Figure 6‐19 Conceptual Photometric Plan – Phase II.  Site lighting should not create glare nor be obtrusive to adjacent properties.  Lighting fixtures should complement the architectural design of the building. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 6‐29  Appropriate lighting should be used at entries, courtyards, pedestrian walkways, and other areas utilized by pedestrians. Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020Figure 6-16a: Conceptual Landscape Plan - Phase I 40'Scale: 1" = 20'020'10'Schematic Landscape Plan“Cohen Property” - Orange, CADavid CohenProject No.: PRS01-DDate: May 29, 20205th - City Submittal3Central community open space area with built in BBQ Counter, wood shadestructure, 2 sided gas fireplace, Bike racks and lounge furniture for smallsocial events and group gatherings.Two community cluster mailboxes, per USPS review and approval.Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan.Enhanced paving at main project entry.Proposed and existing trees, per Planting Plan.Pedestrian natural color community sidewalk with light top-cast finish andsaw-cut joints.Accessible parking stall and striping, per Civil plans.Guest parking stall.Natural colored concrete driveway, with light broom finish and tooled joints.Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained.Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained.Property line per Civil Engineer plan.Public street R.O.W. per Civil Engineer plan.Existing public street sidewalk, per Civil plans.FDC's BFD's and Transformer to be screened with landscape, quantity andfinal locations to be determined per Civil Plans.5.9.8.7.6.4.3.2.1.LEGEND10.11.12.13.14.15.53631568111014392711111511101213911141111114918555Proposed BikeRack1515ROW / P.L.ROW / P.L.Existing Tree tobe Removed2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO)LJXUHE&RQFHSWXDO/DQGVFDSH3ODQ3KDVH,, Figure 6-17a: Conceptual Planting Plan - Phase ISagecrest Planning+Environmental, 2020 (1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(4)(5)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(24)(21)(22)(23)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)98765214311131415162112191820222810172425262723TE. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkOlea e. Wilsonii (Fruitless Olive)Type/FormPlatanus x acerifolia 'Columbia'Cupressus sempervirens (Italian Cypress)PLANTING LEGENDPALMSSymbolFloweringVerticalSpecimenLargeColumnarTrunkSingleSingleSingleSingleBotanical Name (Common Name)SuggestionsTristania conferta (Brisbane Box)BufferSingleSingleEriobotrya deflexa (Bronze Loquat)Arbutus 'Marina' (Strawberry Tree)StreetSize36" Box24" Box24" Box15 Gal15 Gal15 GalPhoenix dactylifera (Date Palm)VerticalSingle8-10' BTTREESLowMedLow(Reg 3)Qty.51617Med 25Med8Low4Low 39Myrtus communis ‘Boetica’ (Boetica Myrtle)CanopyWUCOLTotal Trees=114Handroanthus impetiginosus (Pink Trumpet in Parkways)Existing TreeJacaranda mimosifolia (jacaranda)Canopy--MedPer PlanVINES & ESPALIERSBougainvillea 'Red & White' Macfadyena unguis-cati Type/FormSymbolSizeSuggestions(Reg 3)Qty.WUCOLEspalier5 GalLow 61 Gal Low 7Vine(Bougainvillea) (Cat's Claw Vine)Schematic Planting Plan“Cohen Property” - Orange, CADavid CohenProject No.: PRS01-DDate: May 29, 20205th - City Submittal40'Scale: 1" = 20'020'10'NOTES:1. Irrigation (including spray and/or drip) will be provided, in the Construction Document phase, and tobe installed per local California water regulations (AB1881) .2. Transformers, back-flow preventers & other above-ground utilities to be screened with landscapeas permitted per local codes & regulations.3. Landscape lighting (landscape up-lights, path lights/bollards, etc.) to be coordinated with ElectricalEngineer in future phase.4. The plant palette listed provides a list of plant material to select from when preparing finallandscape construction documents for this project. However, substitutions may be required due toavailability, soils tests, or other conditions.5. All trees within 5' of hardscape to be installed with deep root barriers.6. Trees planted along the fire access roadway and/or firefighter required walkway shall not impedethe required minimum 5'0” walkway width or the required fire apparatus vertical clearance of 13'-6”.The trees should be a type that the natural growth pattern would allow the required verticalclearance without reliance on regular maintenance of the tree canopies.SHRUBS and GROUND COVERAgave Blue GlowBlue Glow Agave Aloe 'Super Red' AloeRosmarinus p. Aeonium sp.AeoniumCarex divulsaBerkeley SedgeNassella pulchra Purple NeedlegrassMuhlenbergia rigensDeer GrassBougainvillea La Jolla La Jolla BougainvilleaDasylirion longissimumMexican Grass TreeCercis occidentalisWestern RedbudBaccharis pilularisCoyote Brush Yucca Bright StarBright Star YuccaJuncus patens JuncusEcheveria sp.EcheveriaSenecio m. Dianella revolutaFlax LilyLigustrum j. `Texanum` Wax Leaf PrivetSalvia greggii RedRed Texas SageWestringia fruticosaCoast RosemaryTecoma stansYellow BellsLantana 'New Gold' 'New Gold' Lantana Existing ParkwayTrees to RemainExisting Parkway Tree to be removedto allow for new project entry driveExisting ParkwayTrees to RemainVines on wall, per legendEspalier on wall,per legend'Huntington Carpet''Blue Chalk Sticks'Proposed tree Handroanthusimpetiginosus to match adjacentstreet trees or as approved by CityStaff.ROW / P.L.ROW / P.L.2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO)LJXUHE&RQFHSWXDO3ODQWLQJ3ODQ3KDVH,, 1QA I 0+:(.0@*(@B;*FF!4&7707,FF%98F'<6'8FD+F#C1A+F F>18+FF F F3A-E)96F9/+8F2D28-F$<C?AF FF#96+<A98F+ F ='8-+FF F 46 F F56 "59AF'A+F C5EF F F CIP1S^eRZyToIX2 PS O w.61W/60636 + JLv+ JL+ v +J(#v+ JLhIv 6 666*'6 (6 !(+!#6 66 -*,%$) $&"6 g}EV Op$/I16 ?cJbI[U%1U={1cI1pI[Ue LeupP&S]UpB1p!2C) a{I=AHieJ>eGIAP=IUUQeP'pIYq+P"{ ^[PAS[=AP,`P1U@1_1p*IP=IU)AI\Lk PJfrC\pP[F3pJ[UQ&U)5#=CIjpB:1p l6BetsA=[N&OP&U)(8[M D1v9A=CI#(1pCIiPApB:Q1U@1^A1pL;PP1dh(2C)PIx[UJ1PIKmpIU)~z.-<n7\=I|4PAUp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ÿH6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO)LJXUH&RQFHSWXDO3KRWRPHWULF3ODQ3KDVH,, AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 6‐36 6.4.6 Walls and Fences  Wall and fence design should complement the project’s architecture. Landscaping should be used to soften the appearance of wall surfaces.  Walls should accommodate landscape treatment, and architectural monumentation. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 7‐1 CHAPTER 7.0 ACCESS, CIRCULATION AND PARKING Mobility in Orange is directly related to the regional transportation network, as the City lies at the confluence of several regional freeways: the Santa Ana Freeway/Interstate (I‐5), Orange Freeway/State Route 57 (SR‐57), Garden Grove Freeway/State Route 22 (SR‐22), Costa Mesa Freeway/State Route 55 (SR‐55), Riverside Freeway/State Route 91 (SR‐91) and Eastern Transportation Corridor/State Route 241 (SR‐241). In addition to the freeways, other connections to the region include the commuter rail system known as Metrolink, a freight and goods rail transport system, and a regional bikeways system with connections to neighborhoods, employment centers, parks, the Santa Ana River Trail and other locations. Orange is also connected to the region via the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus system. This section defines the Specific Plan provisions for mobility and circulation within the Specific Plan Area and surrounding area. The Specific Plan is intended to provide not only good auto circulation, but also choices and opportunities for effective and convenient transit, pedestrian and bicycle circulation. 7.1 Access 7.1.1 Street System The street system provides the circulation backbone for all transportation modes in the City. The street system essentially comprises a grid‐type system throughout the area surrounding the project site; although west of the railroad tracks the grid system is less complete. The local roadway system serves the community’s primary needs for mobility and access, and consists of a hierarchy of City streets to meet those needs. The Orange‐Olive Specific Plan connects to the City of Orange’s existing hierarchy of streets for vehicle access at Orange‐Olive Road and Grove Avenue. Figure 7‐1 Existing Roadway Classifications in the Specific Plan Area reflects the roadway system in the vicinity of the Specific Plan that immediately serves the Specific Plan. 7.1.2 Transit Service to the Specific Plan Area Effective regional transportation strategies are required to successfully implement City and County plans for accommodating future growth. OCTA provides public bus service for the City of Orange. OCTA operates two bus routes in the area: Route 59 with a stop at Glassell Street/Meats Avenue approximately 0.25 miles from the project site; and, Route 46 with a stop at Glassell Street/Taft Avenue approximately 0.45 miles from the project site. In addition, the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) provides long‐distance bus service between The Village at Orange (located on Tustin Street at Meats Avenue, less than a mile from the project site) and the Downtown Terminal in Riverside. The Metrolink Inland Empire – Orange County Line (800 Series) runs along, and parallel to the west side of Orange‐Olive Road. The nearest Metrolink Stations are the Orange Metrolink Station approximately 2.6 miles to the south; and, the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station approximately 3.1 miles to the north. Figure 7‐2 Transit Routes Serving the Specific Plan Area reflects the transit resources in the vicinity of the Specific Plan Area that immediately serve the project site. 7.1.3 Pedestrian Amenities and Bikeways Serving the Specific Plan Area Orange’s relatively mild climate permits bicycle riding year‐round, and the growing popularity of bicycling has drawn enthusiasts onto the streets and bike trails throughout the City. Orange also AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 7‐2 maintains an extensive developed network of public sidewalks in the Specific Plan vicinity. On‐site pedestrian and bicycle circulation are provided by an internal five‐foot wide sidewalk that provides direct access from the proposed residential uses to Orange‐Olive Road and Grove Avenue and connect to the existing pedestrian sidewalks and bicycle circulation routes in the area. In the vicinity, there is a continuous sidewalk along the east side of Orange‐Olive Road directly adjacent to the project site, but none along the west side since it is adjacent to the Metrolink (railroad) right‐of‐way. The eight‐foot wide sidewalk along the east side of Orange‐Olive Road connects to Meats to the north of the project site, E Grove to the south, and continues half a mile south to E Taft Avenue. There are continuous sidewalks on both sides of the street on East Meats Avenue and East Grove Avenue. Although there are no existing bicycle facilities (i.e., Class I, II, or III bike lanes) along Orange‐Olive Road, there are planned Class II facilities proposed on Meats Avenue to the north, Taft Avenue to the south and Glassell Street to the west, that would provide access to Activity Centers along Tustin Street (Figure CM‐3 Plan for Recreational Trails and Bikeway, Circulation and Mobility Element, City of Orange General Plan 2010). Residents in the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan have access to the existing pedestrian and bike system already serving the local area and the City of Orange. Figure 7‐3 General Plan Bikeways Serving the Specific Plan Area reflects the bikeways and trails in the vicinity of the Specific Plan Area that serve the Specific Plan area. Figure 7-1: Existing Roadway Classiöcations City of Orange Environmental Advisors, LLC Orange Olive Speciöc Plan Legend: Major Arterial Project Site Primary Arterial Secondary Arterial Collector Street 59 46 213 To Orange Metrolink Station To Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station Figure 7-2: Transit Routes City of Orange Environmental Advisors, LLC Orange Olive Speciöc Plan Legend: Project SiteMetrolink Local Routes Intracounty Express Figure 7-3: General Plan Bikeways City of Orange Environmental Advisors, LLC Orange Olive Speciöc Plan Legend: Existing Class II (On Street) Project Site Proposed Class I (Off Street) Proposed Class II (On Street) Proposed Class III (On Street) AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 7‐6 7.2 Circulation and Parking Access to the Phase I project site is provided from Orange‐Olive Road as shown in Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I and Figure 3‐3 Phase I Site Plan via a relocated driveway. Access to the Phase II project site is provided from Grove Avenue as shown in Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II and Figure 3‐7 Phase II Conceptual Site Plan via a relocated driveway as well. Orange‐Olive Road is designated as a Secondary Arterial on the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways (Figure CM‐2, Circulation and Mobility Element, City of Orange General Plan 2010). Orange‐ Olive Road is 64 feet wide with an eight‐foot wide sidewalk. The sidewalk adjacent to the Phase I project site was repaired or replaced in areas depending on the existing condition at the time of build out. The Phase I access location from Orange‐Olive Road is an un‐signalized access point. The project site is accessed by right‐turn by vehicles driving north, and by left turn via a center turn lane by southbound vehicles. On‐site vehicular circulation is via a single main drive aisle, which provides access to six clusters of four homes sited around a shared motor court. The main drive aisle is 26 feet wide with eight‐foot wide parallel parking stalls and five‐foot wide sidewalks on both sides. Access to residential garages within each cluster is taken from the shared motor court area. One unit, at the east end of the drive aisle, has direct access to/from the drive aisle. The portion of Grove Avenue to be utilized as the Phase II access point is not identified in the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways, therefore it is to be considered a street with lower circulation rates than Orange‐Olive Road. Grove Avenue is approximately 30 feet wide with an eight‐foot wide sidewalk on the Phase II Specific Plan side. The sidewalk adjacent to the Phase II Specific Plan area will be repaired and replaced in areas of and surrounding the existing curb breaks. The Phase II access location from Grove Avenue is an un‐signalized access point. The project site can be accessed by right‐ turn by vehicles driving west, and by left turn via the westbound traffic lane. On‐site circulation is proposed to be five road segments, identified as interior road A through D on Figure 3‐7 Phase II Conceptual Site Plan. The main drive aisle is 25 feet wide with nine‐foot wide landscaped areas and five‐foot wide sidewalks on both sides. Access to residential garages is taken from the respective interior road, typically resulting in cul‐de‐sac clusters at the end of each interior road. Eight units located linearly on the interior roads have direct access to/from the drive aisle. Specific Plan access point driveways are reconstructed to City standards. In addition, ADA compliant ramps are constructed at the entrances to Specific Plan developments. The main drive aisle for all developments is adequate to accommodate emergency vehicles. In Phase I, a hammerhead is provided at the east end of the main drive aisle. In Phase II, two hammerhead turnaround locations are provided on interior roads ‘C’ and ‘E’, accessed via interior road ‘B’, to allow turn‐around access for emergency vehicles and trash/delivery trucks, as shown in Figure 7‐4 Fire Master Plan – Phase II. On‐site pedestrian circulation is provided by internal sidewalks that provide direct access to Orange‐ Olive Road and Grove Avenue and connect to the existing pedestrian circulation routes in the area. Phase I and Phase II of the Specific Plan provides two‐car garages for each unit, for a project total of 114 garage spaces. In addition, the Specific Plan provides 50 open guest parking spaces distributed throughout the Specific Plan area. In total the Specific Plan provides 164 parking spaces. In addition, street lighting is constructed along private drive aisles as well as Orange‐Olive Road and Grove Avenue, AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 7‐7 adjacent the Specific Plan area. The placement and type of street lighting matches existing street lighting along Orange‐Olive Road and the neighborhood to the east. 8Σ (Σ F]ȭNΣ LΣ ȾȜ4Σ ǘȖVΣ ²Σ ʠʼΣeNΣ Σ $Σ ÚΣ Σ O2 Σ Σ 8Σ 4ΣΣOJΣ ʵΣ¾ΣΣȦízĺÓΣ (Σ²Σ ȅĦǝNΣ Σ wŉ˛ʓΣ ÀΣ ESK#Σ Σ Σ =Σ Σ$Σ ȮʶȿßΣ Á2ŚΣ Σ Σ ÚΣΣɮJΣ Ŏ4ΣΣ O2JȵΣ Σ¾Σ Σ xĲōAĺ2ÓΣ Σ }ßΣ yEΣ F¶uÞΣ Σ ĜΣ ɎΣ EΣ §ƶΣ Σ ɞŁvɴTΣ ʋïΣ Σ $Σ ŅΣ Σ Σ Ŏ4Σ Fɰ®Σ Σ ɳΣ ȶ«`Σ 4ŨΣ ĲíAĻÓΣ ĩ`ĥ_ΣΣwŉˢΣ ǡ9ΣΣΣEň4Σ#Σ $8Σ¬ΣA8ΣΣΣ=Σ Σ~Σâřǲ]Σ ÁŚΣ Ř$à3Σ[Õb[7ΣáΣ ĳŊΣΣ SUť`Σ ĤzΣΣΣ>ΣΣΣâřǳßΣ Á2ʴΣ $ȘRΣ¼ŏUΣĘƝΣ 1DÑΣŦΣ >7XIΣ °Σ LΣΣ¬3ΣAΣΣ$Σ ʷĻʧ!Σ ʿȕ\Σ{Σ~ ΣȬΣ 'ɉVΣ ƾđƥ¦Σ wɧΣ 'ãΣΣ ˜ΡΣ ^RΣ ŘUŦ3Σ 1ƺD7Σ °Σ#9ΣΣ FãΣΣVΣLΣ$8Σ SUť`Σ¶zΣΣ (Σ VΣ ˠ]NΣSΣwí³]ʐΣˡΣ?ΣċΣ xʘΣ ^ĝȊΣ śΣ>lĕɑΣáΣ ŋ9ΣΣ JSUΣA8ΣΣ~xcΣ (ΣΣΣ¬Σ xA8ΣΣ~(Σ Σ¨ǏΣ ]´RΣ SĪ¹3Σ17CD7Σ °Σŋ9Σ Σ xz8Σ LΣ$8Σ EňéΣΣǢΣ «ˣǮΣΣ Σ D7Σ °ΣàvɪΣ Σ «ˤǯΣ Σ (Σ ȟǽ_]NΣ Σ ȂNΣ LΣ $Σ ÚΣΣOJΣ FǨ¶uȑΣə'ÙΣ Z!ΣD=1ΣdΣĜΣ =IǅǀΣ ŒΣǇDΣΣ ņǴΣ»ǺïΣ ~Σ{Σ²Σ ɊħÞΣ Ã_4Σ $Σ ʈ\ΣŗŧΣ#Σ ΣĿEΣǑ3șΣ ΣǙɫΣ Z¨!Σ EΣ>Σ Σ»ɱΣΣ'PˬΣ Σ$8ΣņRΣ Σ$Σ|4ΣFOu®ΣΣ~ΣǼ4ũΣ ?yΣɦYΣ ļī¤>)=DΣ ȗ˒ǋΣ DĕǆĒĈΣƠǻ4Σ ΣO Σǚ^ġĽʎΣ (ΣˇĽΣ Σ˓ΣėΣ Ƞĥ_ɸKìΣ ĩʔĦǠΣ ?Σ TΣ ZƬƱΣ wɵAcΣ 1Σ ēčĔÐΣ TΣ ˎ ? Ģ³\FɒΣȆʦΣɚɺΣÐļī¤>)=D΢Σ ʝΣ Σ Σ¼ŏ$Ý\e¹3Σ ĤAΣ ΣΣ ɏ[Σ ¯½Σ ?Σ >Σ ¯½Σ ģǾ¾Σ ØΣʸΣ?ʡXΣ y#ç^Σ ²Σ ×2Σ¿Σ dΣ 8Σ SÝ\3Σ ǹzΣ Σ $8Σ deʁʙK#Σ ΣO2JĴ)PΣʑǒ(Σ {Σ ±PΣ ΣóêˉȐΣ lΣ ¯½Σ ɶÝ\e¹3Σ Σ Σ ğśɋΣ Σ O2JĴ)PΣ ʒ!Σ ©[Σ ¯½Σ JS$ȞΣ Σ Σ ğɘɟΣ Σ ±PΣ ΣôêÂȋΣ y#Âç^ΣΣʟΣ ôæΣ ÃUΣ$Σ ˀΣΣΣÜmǛCΣ #ˁŕΣ eːǕǐĐƞΣ (̈́cΣĞŇȌ´Σ Ň^ΣĎƯ49ΣòšTΣ IętƲΣΠΣ ¼ɬ]ʾΣΣóêˊΣ OJΣ ØΣǉ>Σ ȹAĪȚǌΣ ('ΣįȺłȒéȱΣ Σ AD%7]?Q<"DY] %G%:%<J]7.<%] %X.GJ.<)]D%K0<.<)]U77] %<OD7.<%] =7Σ Σ(Σ ñm_4ĶΣ'(!Σʬ¾Σ Z7Σ ɤäȓèΣåfïΣ ΣǈĒΣ "3%<J] AD?A%DJY]7.<%] D%"]QD]<?]AD5.<)] +?G%]AQ77]Ò>Iĉ Ǆ¤=l=7 %X ] :<+?7%] (.D%]+Y"D<J] }3 ΣΣ }3 ΣZΣ }3 Σ1Σ !lDΣðΣ ń· Σ '¤1Σ !DI>ΣðΣń·2 Σ')1Σ t!7IƿΣǫ·2 Σ')1Σ ìTŞK#Σ˪Σ ţΣ Fvî_mΣÖ'ΣâVΣƭΣȼèΣ ##"# 'ȸΣǥȇ4ȲΣ E Σ 1Σ Ƶ7ƽΣðΣÜ· Σ')1Σ ìTŞK#Σ˫ΣţΣ Q.7".<)] A7<]] D%C ] (.D%](7?U])A:] :.<]<Q]+Y"D<KG] T]+ZD<J]GA.<)](%%J] :X]".GJ]J?]GJD%%J]A?.<J] (%%J] GJD%%J]7.)+J] G.<)7%]])D?QA]P%%G] %X] AD5.<)]7?J]7.)+J] A%D](]AA%<".X]]K7%] A%D](]AA%<".X]]K7%][] A%D](]AA%<".X]]K7%][] A%D](]AA%<".X]]K7%][] Σ ƮΣ Σ Ö'ΣʪɁAɓæ®Σœ Σ Ö'ΣÂɠȁ±|AcΣE Σ Σ͢ ### 1>I)I1)> !# ZƫD)¦Σ Y[ÑΣ ?] $ΣǞ\F_ŃĶΣ ŗŧΣäàŌΣ 'Σ ?ʚNΣ #Σ Σ ǟʌȰΣ ?ˈΣ TΣ åɲ˭ŌΣ ģòΣ K#Σ ĵΣ µYΣ 1ZǊΣ {Σ K#Σ ĵTΣ µ¥Σ 1ǁΣ ǣ9Σ SUΣĘƟƻlÑƹƳÐΣ Σ ɻΣ '¶cΣ #Σ Ě3Σ Σ Σ ŅRΣ Σ $8Σ OJΣ |4Σ ʮP˩XΣ *EB,.] H9%] ±PΣPΣ ### # ˗ǵʰ˨Σ ɝɹΣ ΣΣǪΣ Ü³]ʂ{Σ'(Σ ȻȏłħΣ ΣPΣ b ŁVΣ (ΣȥŜŃ9Σ?ˋ9Σn2fΣĹΣPΣɽºôNΣȈȢΣ ˌ tC fΣ VΣ{Σ«˧ŝɡ9Σ?Âɗɢ9Σn2fΣ (ɂñ3Σ¸őºŤΣĨΣ#ΣΣ˃Σ $8ΣǦΣdΣʭÙΣEµʢK#ΣÀΣΣJ³ǤΣΣʣ3Σưʗ3Σ LΣɾġ49 ĬľȝΣóɀÛıΣĳŊΣ$ΣE3Σ Vũ §k J#)Fĭʤuİŝ2Σďuİʲʃ×ΣK#ΣnfΣěΣΣŀΣΣ=Σ Ģĭ`ΣdΣäȔãΣ ÃUΣ ŀΣʽΣΣēčĔƜΣ ĨΣɇŜǓØʻ#ΣnfΣĞ#Á2Σ ÃUΣ ǜǶȽAu!Σ (ΣnΣ?ΣƩŢˍΣ¿Σ?Σ Σ¸őºŤΣ e¹ΣSΣ ˥ ¼|ŕRΣ(ˏ9Σķ|ʄTΣΣǖFAȤ ÔC ªΣĝȍʫΣ'ɨ(ΣnfΣĹΣPΣ Σ ɩTò¿Σ ˖KΣǸ\ʅ RΣΣ Σȣ \Σ 1Ĉ)=ƜΣ ɈΣ˄`ΣʉΣeNΣ (ɍǬ´Σ LΣ$8ΣªΣĠΣ'(VŨΣ œR Σ ʺ ǂ ΣEʍɃ49ΣΣɼç¿Σ#Σ˅Σɣʇº˝ΣÀ ΣZlΣáΣdΣ ˙cÀƦ ¨C ªΣɥΣďȃʳʆ×ΣK#Σ ˚ŢΣěΣ»î_mΣ˞^ΣΣΣëvǰ'ΣLΣʊ`ˆ Œʏ9ΣΣ˔ɄÛıΣdΣOȄΣLΣĿ ΣΣ »î_m]NΣ ˟cUΣΣĚŖȡΣĠ '(VŪΣwɯΣĬľȴ´Σ˕ÛΣšʞ ªΣñmAɔæ®ΣŪeɛΣ LΣɭȧōèΣ LΣëȯΣĐɐ ©ɕΣ?µ˦`ΣnΣ?ΣɌfÞΣΣ$Σ ydΣį˂ RΣLΣ¬ÙΣåŐʛΣëcΣ# ǷȎNΣȳʹ`Σǭʕʥé9Σʨ2RΣ'|zȀΣķŐʜʖΣ ### # xʩK#ΣFvŔŖĮ^şǍΣ b Σ Σ ;"Σ *6Σ joͣΣ ŴƄΣĀΣ j āČΣ ¸i*Σ ůB.Σ +HΣ ̍Σ ;p Σ .ŮΣ IlΣ ʹΣ @Σ ƑqkΣ ǩ Σ <Σ }6ƔpΣ ̙̞Σ Σ ơ>ƼΣƸ)ƴ[IΣ È ;pΣʯBƀÊ¥ tY Σ͎,Σ̅Σ 5;&" Σ 0+iΣΣ ̕Σą%Σ Σ hŲΊƛΣ Σ Σ ÷¥Σ Ë)Q<, Σ r ÅΣ ͓Ƃ.Σ -Σ ƐƈW%&5 Σ ǃĖ7¦Σ ͅMb!Σ ͖WΣ Ƙ<Σ &!Σ ˹÷!Σ% ƒGΣ 0g¡Σ Σ Σ .Σ ¢Σ ĊΣ ̓"Σ Σ Σ -Σ ͏,Σ r 5;"C §Ƨ Ȩ%Σ j āΣ QΣ ÉųΣ Bźŵ&"!Σ Σ a "Σ ö*ͦΣ Ʌ ;"Σ ĀΣ 6ÿΣ ͭ% Σ Σ .,Σ ̂Σ 5;"CΣ Σ õ̇:Σ Σ ÄW ΁GΣ +iΣ Σ ȩ̼Σ ʀƔ" ̜ΣΣÒ>IĉΣZė)ƷY ÔX ɿ*Σ@+H΀ Σ -ΣÇΣ Σr ÅΣ6̺ΣpΣ@;&pMX Õk Σ ͛ 5Σ ūj͔ΈΣ ýøΣ Q)Σ Σ ŶÍΣ ,Σ ăΣ 0+HΣ Σ ·ĸƂ. )ƨΣ ¨C Σr ÅΣ ΣΜƊqΣ0+HΣ Σ ͽ*5ΣΣͪ˰Σ ö˲Σ -Σ ΅;ΣΣ+H ̵¥ jΣ Ɨ̔ΣgͰoq ΣĀΣ ΣúΣ0*ËΣΣů:ŭΗΣ"̩̀̋ © ɷ&Ǝ&"Σ -Σ ÇΣ ăΣ Σ Ν*qΣ sΣ 6.Σ @Σ ̎ĂpΣ %Σ ;G"Σ - @;"ΣΣΣ &̴Σ -Σ͝&Σ%Σ"Σƕo͆ΣΣɆ˼ ęC ʱùÌƅƛΣ ÉųΣ żΣ -Σ =7Σ rΣ ƆΣ *͇Σ 0 Σ Σ 6£ΓΣ @;øΣ ¢ úΣsΣ<ΣΣ ą%Σ Ϳ Σ +H"Σ Σ÷Y đC ŠΣ͟āΣh̃Σ 0+HΣΣöŭΘΣ ΣΣΌM.ΣŸΣ ΣſΣ/Σ̆ͯÊY Y žHΣ ΣƗ"˷Σ ͚Σ6͠ÿΣÈΣÇΣhÆgƉ&ƁGΣ Σ0+ ΣΣ̸͡ΣQ<Σ,Σ ɖ ƚΣ%ΣüΣBÆƇƁGΣ˯ ŽXΣ tX ǧ͈B̾ Σ -Σ̡rΣ %Σ ƆΣ̪͘Σ0ËΣ Σ /£˻ΣQ<Σ *o͵ΣΣ Σ ̹Σ ̢ 6õ5 ΣI7Σ ûΣ Σ"Ź&YΣ ȷț2Σ FvŔmĮ^şǎΣ Ȫ̻Σ :Σ ćΣ0 ΣΣ *ͼjΣ ŸΣ Σ ŷΣ -ΣΣ ĆΣ Σ Σ ŷΣ -ΣΣ Ć ŴƄΣ ̝6Σ Ď¢Σ Ƙ<Σ h˳ΣĆΣ Σ Σ ¢Σ ̟ Q)ƀΣ Σ ̠ Q)žþΣ ÈΣÇ ăΣ QΣ Bź̈Σ ÏͧΣ ýΣÒk X!ΣͲĂ̊Σ ͱWøΣ ƢΣ ŠΣ Ɠ:,ΣΣ 6;: Σ ΋̤Σ<Σ +HΣūW/aΣ ſΣ ΖΣ%Σ Êͤh̶ Σ BÆ͞GΣ &ͩΣ Ì/ΉGΣ : %Σ 6˶ŻΣ ÊƊhþ Σ .Σ ̣Σ Σ <Σ 5Σ ΂Σ ćΣ *ƐͫGΣ ,Σ ÄW/aΣΣǔÍΣ y,Σ¸iċ tb EúG&ƣΣ ̒ÌƅΙΣ Σ *Σ ù̖GsΣ Σ /ÅΣ 0+iΣ Σ ˾ýΣ 5*5Σ Σ %Σ Σ Σ . Σ -Σ =Ė7¦Σ .ƏΣ Σ ÏƉ̛Σ ̿ Σ /Ώ g¡)Β,Σ ̱̄Ύq Σ ͋ §b ˽̫"ΣüΣ :Σ ˵5 ΣsΣΣ6ÿΣΣ<ΣΣˮ-Σ@&"Σ hÆG Σ ̏Σ ́Ə ÔC hűΣ Σ 0+HΣ Σ . Σ Σ Σ -Σ Σ ͕%Σ Σ ̽Σ Σ Σ Σ Σ . ͐ ΍M:Σ Σ: :Σ <Σ j ƖΚ ÕX Σ Σ 0*¡Σ Σ *ƈW/aΣ ą%Σ Σ @+̀&Σ Σ g¡Σ Σ @Σ Ą̬́Σ ΐ̭< ǿ,Σ[Σ -Σ<ΣǱ =Č ǗW/aΣ Σ Q˱ƖΞΣ 0iΣ Σ /£˿Σ Σ iΣ ͬoͨΣ G5 Σ Σ +HΣ Ƌ ΕŰƙC ˘ "Σ +iΣ Σ ̑Σ Σ *̷ Σ @Σ õΣ Σ ,Σ Σ Σ *͉ QΣ B̮ MͷΣ Σ *¡Σ Ċ&͹Σ Ƒ.ƓM!Σ üΣ ƇGΣ "ÎΣ ËΣ "ÎΣ ƚ5̧Żͻ̘ ƌqż.,Σ̗ͮ!Σ *ƍΣ ΃.Σ ŲM!Σ 6ͺΣ Q Űƙ!Σ Σ ,Σ £Σ %Σ gÍΣ ÈΣ ŶÍŹ&5 Σ Ïͳ ͸MkΣ ˑ̌"Σ %Σ ĸB͌ Σ ûƋΣ 0+HΣ Σ ƃ&ͶΣ Bű Σ%Σ ΣΣÉ "5 Σ -Σ*:gƍΣ̐͂ÎΣ ͜M!Σ%Σ΄MC © ȉ͑ÌΣ Σ &ͥM̨Σ Σ ͙̥̚,Σ <Σ b[Σ ˺Σ ΛΣ 0+HΣ Σ Σ ˴Σ @ o̓Bþ Σ %Σ:Σ Δ< Σ[Σ ûΣ -ΣĄ&:Σ Αg͊ÎΣ ͗5 Σ%ΣĄ̳Σ/ -Σa ƪ@ΣΆ.Σ/ΣsΣΣŬ/aΣ;ƌqŽ:,ΣΟùb Dk sΣ ÉÏ6Σ B̯ŵ Σ Σ Σ ÄW/aΣ ȫƤΣ ɜŮ,Σ }ĂΣ %Σ ÄW/aΣ Σ :! @˸ Σ Σ Σ .Σ Σ /Σ ć!Σ ̦B̉Σ ;Σ M!Σ ͍͒ Σ rB̰̲Σ Σ % ,Σƃ&Ǝ&p!Σ0+ Σjo6Σ6£ƕ!Σ@;&" !Σ ¢ΣŬ/ƒΣsΣΣk /IIR&] #\&] L'=LL0S'] -& 6&#!;]#FW;] #FV>)](/8&] AD?4&M]>?]]1$] I-&&N]>R:&D] @(]G-&&NG] I 8&] ]2] 2UDQJH2OLYH6SHFLILF3ODQ&LW\RI2UDQJHÿ 6DJHFUHVW3ODQQLQJ(QYLURQPHQWDO )LJXUH)LUH0DVWHU3ODQ3KDVH,, AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐1 CHAPTER 8.0 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS The purpose of this chapter is to summarize the existing infrastructure facilities and discuss recommended upgrades (if any) for the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan area. The recommended upgrades are based on comparing the existing facilities and their capabilities with the proposed development within the Specific Plan Area. Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I and Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II reflect the on‐site utility infrastructure that would be in place at Specific Plan build out. 8.1 On Site Drainage and Storm Drain System 8.1.1 Storm Drain Existing Conditions Both the City and the County are responsible for the management of the storm drain and flood control facilities in Orange. The Orange County Flood Control District provides for the planning, development, operation, and maintenance of the flood control facilities. The City Public Works Department is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the City’s storm drain system, as well as reviewing development projects to ensure that storm drains properly feed into the local and regional systems. Like most of the City, runoff from the Specific Plan Area is conveyed to the Santa Ana River. The drainage for the Phase I project site flows to the southwest corner of the property into a narrow concrete channel, then to the City’s storm drain system. The current drainage for the Phase II project site flows to the southwest corner of the property, then to the City’s storm drain system. There is a catch basin located south of the project site at the corner of Orange‐Olive Road and Grove Avenue, which converges with the Collins Channel, then ultimately outlets to the Santa Ana River. The Santa Ana River outlet to the Pacific Ocean is at the boundary between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach. Planned Improvements The proposed development on the project site does not increase runoff to the City’s storm drainage system. More than 90 percent of the existing Phase I Area is impervious, and more than 94 percent of the existing Phase II Area is impervious. Specific Plan implementation would incorporate landscaping and open space, thereby decreasing the amount of impervious surfaces on the Phase I project site to 71 percent and Phase II project site to 65 percent. The decrease in impervious surfaces represents a decrease in the volume of runoff generated by the proposed development. Thus, upgrades to the City’s existing storm drain facilities would not be required. Build out of the Specific Plan area would be required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program, which regulates discharges to the Santa Ana River as mandated by the Clean Water Act. Locally, the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the City of Orange Local Implementation Plan (LIP) provide the framework for compliance within the project area and discuss the pollutants of concern for each of the County’s watersheds. The Orange County Technical Guidance Document (TGD) provides the design standards and procedures to follow to improve water quality associated with runoff from existing and developed areas in the County. The NPDES program and City’s Water Quality requirements require the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that would identify pollutants of concern and treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs) to remove pollutants from post‐construction project site runoff prior to discharging to the City’s storm drain system. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐2 Compliance with the NPDES program and the DAMP and LID ensure that the implementation of the Specific Plan does not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The next section summarizes in more detail the WQMP Requirements, LID design features, and BMPs that are required and incorporated into the Specific Plan implementation. The original drainage for the Specific Plan area flows to the southwest corner of the Specific Plan area, then to the City’s storm drain system located on Orange‐Olive Road. Development of the Phase I project site includes the installation of a drywell chamber on each side of the proposed entry driveway to the project site in order to collect runoff from the residential development. Post‐development, the drainage sheet flows over impervious pavement and into catch basins connected to subsurface storage chambers and drywells, which capture and infiltrate runoff. During larger storm events once the drywell and detention systems are at capacity, runoff surface flows over the main drive aisle to the public right‐of‐ way to the west edge of the project site. Development of the Phase II project site includes the installation of catch basins that feed into modular wetland biofilters located in two locations throughout the project site, such as adjacent to the common parking area located at the end of interior road ‘A’ and the southwest side of interior road ‘B’. After build out of the Phase II development, the Phase II site will continue to drain to the same city storm drain as before. On site stormwater will drain to catch basins and flow to one of the two modular wetlands units. These units will filter pollutants from the storm water. The modular wetlands capture, treat, and then discharge stormwater into the existing public storm drain line located in Grove Avenue. The modular wetland biofilters contain overflow weirs to bypass in the case of large peak flows, such as during large storm events. The clean storm water then flows to the storm drain in Grove Avenue. This pathways for Phases I and II match historic drainage conditions. The drainage continues in the southerly direction to an existing catch basin on Orange‐Olive Road that converges with the Collins Channel, ultimately converging with the Santa Ana River which outlets to the Pacific Ocean. Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I and Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase II reflect the infrastructure and drainage layout for the project site at build out. 8.1.2 Project WQMP Requirements All projects requiring discretionary and some requiring ministerial City approval are required to prepare a WQMP in accordance with the Orange County Drainage Management Plan (DAMP) and City of Orange Local Implementation Plan (LIP). Chapter 7 of the LIP contains information on the types of projects requiring WQMPs, which include new development and redevelopment projects in both the private and public sector. Refer to the City’s Public Works Department for more information about preparing an approved WQMP. In addition, NPDES requirements, such as the Construction General Permit will be required by the State of California for each new development, greater than one acre, to ensure the beneficial uses of local water bodies are preserved and adverse environmental impacts are minimized. Water Quality Management Plans A Project WQMP is a plan for managing the quality of storm water or urban runoff that flows from a developed site after construction is completed and the facilities or structures are occupied and/or operational. It also provides information related to the project’s generation and mitigation of water quality pollutants and assessment of hydromodification impacts. The Phase I and Phase II WQMPs AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐3 contain project information related to site characteristics, expected pollutants, hydrology impacts, incorporation of structural and non‐structural BMPs, Low Impact Development (LID) design features, operation and maintenance, and public education and training. The collective information is intended to describe how a project will minimize water quality impacts to downstream water bodies. A Project WQMP describes the BMPs that will be implemented and maintained throughout the life of a project and is used by property owners, facility operators, tenants, facility employees, maintenance contractors, etc. to prevent and minimize water pollution that can be caused by storm water or urban runoff. The City of Orange requires all development projects to prepare and implement Project WQMPs as part of the NPDES program to reduce and eliminate water pollution caused by runoff flowing from developed sites into nearby receiving waters. A Preliminary Project WQMP must be submitted for Priority Projects as part of the project application for City discretionary project approval. Final Project WQMPs must be approved prior to issuance of building or grading permits. A Project WQMP and the post construction BMPs associated with the project must be based on the Orange County Model WQMP. A Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/Preliminary and/or Project WQMPs contains information about how to design the required BMPs. Low Impact Development (LID) The use of LID principles can minimize the cause of project impacts by being incorporated in the early planning and design phases of a project. Some of the LID principles that apply to the project area include the following:  Hydrologic source controls  Infiltration BMPs  Evapotransipration, rainwater harvesting BMPs  Biotreatment BMPs Best Management Practices (BMPs) For purposes of a Project WQMP, there are four types of BMPs: 1. Low Impact Development BMPs ‐ Project features that are designed to mimic predevelopment site hydrology and include infiltration (permeable pavers, porous concrete and asphalt, infiltration trenches, etc.), harvest and reuse (cisterns and rain barrels), evapotranspiration. 2. Site Design BMPs – Project features that include LID and features such as conserving natural areas, minimizing impermeable surfaces, minimizing directly connected surfaces into a project to minimize and creating zero discharge areas. Examples include infiltration such as the use of porous asphalt, minimizing impervious areas, and directing roof drains to landscaped areas. 3. Source Control BMPs ‐ Activities or structures aimed at eliminating or minimizing contact between pollutant sources and rainfall or runoff. Examples include educational signage, sweeping, litter collection, and awnings or tarps to cover materials stored outdoors. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐4 4. Treatment BMPs ‐ Interventions intended to address any environmental impacts and either remove the pollutant or control it such that its impacts are lessened to meet defined goals. A Preliminary WQMP was prepared for each phase of proposed development within the Specific Plan area and has been included in Appendix A of this Specific Plan document. According to the Preliminary WQMPs, trash management and litter control procedures shall be utilized to reduce pollution of stormwater runoff. All common area landscape irrigation shall utilize runoff‐minimizing landscape design and employ water conservation principals, including, but not limited to, such provisions as water sensors, programmable irrigation times (for short cycles), etc. Catch basin stenciling will also be used. The Specific Plan development will also implement the following non‐structural BMPs:  Education for Employees and Occupants: Practical informational materials will be provided to owners, occupants and employees on general good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality. Among other things, these materials will describe the use of chemicals (including household type) that should be limited to the property, with no discharge of specified wastes via hosing or other direct discharge to gutters, catch basins and storm drains. The property owner will provide these materials. Thereafter, such materials will be available through the property owner education program. This program must be maintained, enforced, and updated periodically by the property owner. Educational materials including, but not limited to, the materials included in the Appendix B section of this plan will be made available to the employees and contractors of the property owner.  Activity Restrictions: CC&R’s will be recorded for the subject site and will implement all restrictions as conditions. These will also cover any restrictions as denoted in the final set of conditions of approve as provided by the subject site. Restrictions shall include, but not limited to car washing, washing of any hard pavement such as sidewalks, parking lots, streets, mandatory pet waste management, etc.  Common Area Landscape Management: Management programs will be designed and established by the property owner, who will maintain the common areas within the project site. These programs will include how to mitigate the potential dangers of fertilizer and pesticide usage. Ongoing maintenance will be consistent with the City of Orange Model Water‐Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Fertilizer and pesticide usage shall be consistent with City of Orange Guidelines for use of Fertilizers and Pesticides.  BMP Maintenance: The Homeowner Association through use of their management contractors will be responsible for maintenance each of the BMPs detailed in the WQMP.  Spill Contingency Plan: The HOA shall implement a spill contingency plan and provide this to all employees at the time of hire. This plan shall identify all potential hazardous materials and a plan of action to safety clean and remove as well as protect all stormwater inlets.  Common Area Litter Control: The property owners through the HOA and the contracted maintenance company will perform required common area litter control to remove any accumulated trash, debris and other litter. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐5  Employee Training: A training program will be established as it would apply to future employees, contractors, and leasers of the property owner to inform and train in maintenance activities regarding the impact of dumping oil, paints, solvents, or other potentially landscaping maintenance practices; and the impacts of littering and improper water disposal. Training will be done annually and with any new employees.  Catch Basin Inspection: The HOA will maintain the drainage systems, including catch basins and detention systems. The HOA is required to have catch basins inspected and, if necessary, cleaned prior to the storm season, no later than October 1st each year. These duties may be contracted out to the landscape maintenance firm hired by the property owner.  Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots: The HOA shall clean the surface of pavement surfaces by mechanized methods at least one time per week.  Doggie Waste Bags & Signage: The HOA shall provide doggie waste bag station, trash can and signage within open common landscaped areas for residences to utilize when walking dogs within the site. Trash can shall be emptied and all trash/ debris removed at least once a week. 8.2 Water System 8.2.1 Existing Conditions The City’s primary source of domestic water is from groundwater resources supplied by City‐owned wells, which provide approximately 70 percent of the City’s water supply. The City also purchases approximately 25 percent of its domestic water supply from imported water sources. The City also receives three to five percent of its water supply from the Serrano Water District. In addition, the Irvine Ranch Water District serves new development areas in East Orange, and the Golden State Water Company and East Orange County Water District serve small portions of the southeast area of the City. The City is a member of the Orange County Water District (OCWD), which manages the Orange County Groundwater Basin, which is the main source of the City’s water supply.3 Delivery of domestic water service in the City is provided by the Department of Public Works (DPW) Water Division. The City’s service area includes approximately 23.6 square miles and includes 16 wells, eight imported water service connections, 18 storage tanks, 18 pump stations, 451 miles of pipelines, and 37,000 service connections.4 An existing six‐inch cast iron water line is located in Orange‐Olive Road.5 3 City of Orange. Program Environmental Impact Report, City of Orange General Plan (State Clearing House #2006031117). March 2010. 4 Ibid. 5 Conversation with City of Orange Water Division, July 21, 2015. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐6 8.2.2 Planned Improvements Development of the Specific Plan area includes construction of onsite water systems to serve the developments in compliance with City Water Division standards. The existing six‐inch water line in Grove Avenue, running from Orange Olive Road to Shaffer Street, will be upgraded as a part of the Phase II development to an eight‐inch line. As part of implementation of the Specific Plan, the development will connect to the City’s existing water supply system in compliance with the current standards required by the Water Division of the City’s Public Works Department. In addition, five hydrants will be located within the Specific Plan area, two within Phase I and three within Phase II (as identified on Figure 1‐2a, Figure 1‐2b, and Figure 7‐4). 8.3 Sewer System 8.3.1 Existing Conditions Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is responsible for the collection, treatment, and disposal of domestic, commercial, and industrial wastewater generated by over 2.5 million people living and working in central and northwestern Orange County. OCSD operates a comprehensive regional system of collection mains and treatment plants. This system contains two wastewater treatment facilities, which include Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley and Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. Individual cities are responsible for the installation and maintenance of local collection facilities. The City of Orange DPW is responsible for installation and maintenance of local wastewater collection facilities, which convey wastewater to OCSD trunk sewers. DPW is in charge of the daily operation and maintenance of the sewer collection system in the City. Approximately 352 miles of basic sewer collection pipeline is located within the City. Of these pipes, approximately 71 percent are eight inches in diameter, nine percent are six inches in diameter, and approximately seven percent are 12 inches in diameter. In addition, the City operates and maintains three small sewage lift stations. According to the City’s 2012 Sewer Master Plan, the existing design flow along the project frontage on Orange‐Olive Road is 0.9111 cfs with a current flow of 0.0452 and a d/D (flow depth/pipe diameter) of 0.1085. 8.3.2 Planned Improvements No new construction of wastewater treatment or delivery facilities would be required as the current regional and local wastewater system is adequate to accommodate development of the Specific Plan. As part of implementation of the Specific Plan, the development will connect to the City’s existing sewer system in compliance with the current standards required by the City’s Public Works Department. Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I and Figure 1‐2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility – Phase II reflect the infrastructure and layout for the Specific Plan at build out. Based on the Sewer Area Study completed for the Phase I development, the 25 single‐family homes will produce a total project flow output 0.029 cfs of wastewater. The increase of 0.029 cfs would be a nominal increase and will not exceed the design flow and capacity of the existing sewer line. The Phase II development will connect to existing storm drain, water, and sewer lines. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐7 8.4 Electrical System 8.4.1 Existing Conditions Southern California Edison (SCE), an independently owned utility, provides electrical power service to the City of Orange. Since SCE is an independent entity, it sets its own service standards (with the involvement of the Public Utilities Commission) and facility improvement strategies. Currently, there is a network of power grid lines, which supply sufficient electrical power service to the Specific Plan area. There is no major deficient or functional problem in the power supply facilities within the Specific Plan Area. The Specific Plan Area is currently served by overhead electrical utilities and there are two, three‐ phase overhead transformer stations immediately to the south of the project site serving the commercial uses in the existing retail plaza. 8.4.2 Planned Improvements Demand for services and ability to serve new developments are generally determined on a case‐by‐case basis. At this time, no major upgrade of the existing power supply facilities in the Specific Plan Area has been identified. All electrical utility service to the Specific Plan Area will be provided via underground systems. In Phase I, a transformer will be constructed as shown on the Phase I Landscape Plan (Figure 6‐ 5a) between Lot 21 and Lot 22. In addition, the providers of dry utilities to the site (including SCE and The Gas Company) have provided will serve letters to the developer of the Proposed Project site. In Phase II, a transformer will be constructed and located within the community park space, to ensure it is adequately buffered with landscaping to reduce visual impacts. SCE has developed several energy‐efficiency programs for residential, non‐residential, new construction and low‐income subscribers. These include rebate and cash incentive programs for completion of energy‐efficiency projects in residences and businesses, providing energy‐efficient solutions for new developments as well as programs that aid low‐income customers to purchase energy‐efficient refrigerators and outdoor lighting. SCE will continue to promote the resourceful use of energy, and in turn, a reduction in electrical uses and electricity. The Specific Plan will partner with SCE to implement the responsible use of energy and incorporate improvements that will result in an efficient use of electricity. Figure 1‐2a Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan – Phase I and Figure 1‐ 2b Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading and Utility – Phase II reflect the infrastructure and layout for each Specific Plan project site at build out. 8.5 Natural Gas System The Southern California Gas Company (The Gas Company) supplies natural gas to both businesses and residents within the City of Orange. The Gas Company is a division of Sempra Energy. As The Gas Company is an independent private entity, the analysis on the capacity and capability to meet future demand will be conducted by The Gas Company with the coordination of the City upon submittal of building plans by developers. It is important for developers to remember that The Gas Company participates in the California Energy Star® New Homes Program, a performance‐based program that provides builders with incentives for developments that use at least 15 percent less energy than standards set forth in the 2001 California Energy Efficiency Standards. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐8 8.6 Telecommunications System The City of Orange is within the service area of AT&T, a privately owned company. AT&T has existing telephone facilities throughout the Specific Plan area. AT&T will assess the demand for services and ability to serve new developments on a case‐by‐case basis. The capacity and capability analysis for meeting future demand within the Specific Plan will be conducted after building plans are submitted by the developer. Currently, the local telecommunications network in the Specific Plan is functioning sufficiently to accommodate the Specific Plan buildout. 8.7 Cable Television System Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications Orange County are the cable TV service providers for the City of Orange. The Specific Plan Area falls within the service area of Time Warner Cable. Time Warner Cable, a privately owned company, is a full‐service provider of telecommunication products, including digital television programming, local and long distance telephone services, high‐speed internet, and commercial voice and data services. Similar to the other dry utility companies, Time Warner Cable determines the ability to serve new developments on a case‐by‐case basis. Currently, the local cable television network within the Specific Plan is functioning sufficiently and should be able to supply future development in the area without any major upgrade. If upgrades are necessary, Time Warner will provide the upgrades at the appropriate time. 8.8 Solid Waste Disposal Solid waste disposal for the project site will be provided by the City’s trash hauler valet service. Separate trash receptacles for solid waste, recyclables, and organics recycling would be placed in front of the residential units on a specified day and will be moved by the trash driver to the private road/paved area immediately adjacent to affected units and emptied by a trash vehicle. Once emptied, the trash receptacles would then be immediately returned to their designated units by the trash driver. Most solid waste collected is taken to one of three landfills in Orange County: Olinda Alpha Landfill in Brea, Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, or Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano. The majority of solid waste from the City is disposed of at the Olinda Alpha Landfill. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 8‐9 8.9 Domestic Utilities As indicated below in Table 8‐1, the existing service providers in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area will provide domestic utility service, emergency and school services to the site. Table 8‐1 Public Service and Utility Providers Service Provider Water City of Orange Sewer City of Orange Solid Waste CR&R Gas Southern California Gas Company Electricity Southern California Edison Telecommunication AT&T Cable Television Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications Orange County Police Orange Police Department Fire Orange Fire Department School District Orange Unified School District AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 9‐1 CHAPTER 9.0 ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION 9.1 Administration and Enforcement The Community Development Director shall be responsible for administering the provisions of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan in accordance with the provisions of this Specific Plan, the State of California Government Code, the City of Orange General Plan, and the City of Orange Municipal Code. The Community Development Director shall enforce the provision of this Specific Plan and all the applicable codes of all governmental agencies and jurisdictions in such matters including, but not limited to, building, mechanical, fire and electrical codes, and codes pertaining to drainage, waste water, public utilities, subdivisions, and grading. The Planning Commission may review any administrative interpretation, subject to appeal to the City Council. 9.2 Development Procedures All development on the project site shall be subject to the review and appeal procedures, findings and provisions of the Orange Municipal Code. The following reviews and actions are required for the development of the Specific Plan Area and would be processed concurrently with the review and approval of the Specific Plan, TTM, and CEQA document. Change of Zone/Specific Plan A zone change will be required from C‐1 to R‐3 (SP) and for the establishment of the Orange‐Olive Specific Plan. Procedures for the zone change are specified in Section 17.10.020 of the Zoning Code. Major Site Plan Review A Major Site Plan Review, as defined in Section 17.10.060 of the Orange Municipal Code, will be required to determine the compatibility of the development with the surrounding area, any building or site planning issues, circulation and traffic safety, the availability of city services, and any environmental impacts in accordance with CEQA. Design Review As specified in Section 17.10.070 of the Orange Municipal Code, a Design Review will be required, which will consist of a review of the architectural design, massing and scale, context, color palette, signage and landscaping by the Design Review Committee. Tentative Tract Map As specified in Section 17.08.020 of the Orange Municipal Code, Tentative Tract Map Review will be required to administer the provisions of the zoning ordinance and General Plan. CEQA Review CEQA Review, as defined in Section 17.10.080 of the Orange Municipal Code, will be required to determine the potential environmental impacts of the development and identify any mitigation needed. AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN 9‐2 9.3 Phasing and Construction Schedule Phase I is built out, with construction activities commencing in early 2016 and finishing in 2018, at the time of building permit final inspections. Phase II construction activities are yet to be determined at this time. Any project‐level specific construction phasing will occur as appropriate levels of infrastructure and any required improvements are provided. The construction schedule is subject to change over time to respond to the various factors. Individual construction operations would be phased as described below and in Section 3.3 Air Quality of the MND.  Removal and Demolition of existing structures;  Installation of construction driveways and access points;  Construction of all drainage improvements;  Construction of the residential units;  Construction of perimeter wall and /or fencing; and  Installation of site improvements such as pedestrian walkways, tree wells, and interior landscaping and courtyards. 9.4 Financing and Maintenance of Improvements Table 9‐1, below outlines the anticipated financing and maintenance of improvements within the Specific Plan area. There are no public financing measures requested or proposed in the Specific Plan. All improvements identified in the Specific Plan are funded by the developer and will be maintained by the property owner(s) and Homeowner’s Association as outlined in the CC&R’s for the development. Development impact fees will be paid by the developer at the time of building permit issuance, including fees for parks, transportation, sewer connection, sanitation district, library, police and fire fees. Table 9‐1 Financing and Maintenance Improvement Financing Long Term Maintenance Onsite Water System Developer Association Onsite Sewer System Developer Association Onsite Storm Drain System Developer Association Public Street Improvements Developer City of Orange Private Drives Developer Association Landscaping - Public Right-of-Way - Site interior Developer City of Orange Property Owner/Association AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN A‐1 APPENDIX A– IS/MND – PHASE I AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN A‐2 APPENDIX B – SUBSEQUENT IS/MND – PHASE II AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE‐OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN A‐3 APPENDIX C – PHASE II DEVELOPMENT PLANS Cohen Property SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Lead Agency: City of Orange Community Development Department, Planning Division 300 East Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866-1591 Contact: Anna Pehoushek (714) 744-7228 Applicant: Cohen Living Trust 4922 East Somerton Avenue Orange, CA 92867 Contact: David Cohen (714) 401-8200 Prepared by: PSOMAS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Contact: Alia Hokuki (714) 481-8065 July 2020 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 DRC NO. 4969-19; COHEN RESIDENTIAL PREOJECT SUBSEQUENT MND NO. 1865-19 Sept. 19, 2020 DRC Meeting Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance ................................................................ 1-1 Project Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.3.2 Project Proponent ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.3.3 Existing General Plan and Zoning ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.3.4 Existing Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3.5 Proposed Development .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.3.6 Required Approvals ..................................................................................................................... 1-4 Summary of Findings .......................................................................................................................... 1-4 Project Review Process ..................................................................................................................... 1-5 Documents Incorporated by Reference ...................................................................................... 1-6 Scheduled Public Meetings or Hearings ..................................................................................... 1-6 Section 2.0 Project location, Background and Environmental Setting ..................................... 2-1 Project Location .................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 2-1 Existing Site and Area Characteristics ......................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1 Site Access........................................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.3.2 Existing Site Conditions ............................................................................................................ 2-2 2.3.3 Site Topography ........................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Development ....................................................................... 2-3 Planning Context .................................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.4.1 General Plan Designation ........................................................................................................ 2-4 2.4.2 Zoning Designation ..................................................................................................................... 2-4 Existing Environmental Characteristics ..................................................................................... 2-4 2.5.1 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5.2 Vegetation and Wildlife ............................................................................................................ 2-4 2.5.3 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.5.4 Geology ............................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.5.5 Hydrology ........................................................................................................................................ 2-5 2.5.6 Rare and Unique Resources .................................................................................................... 2-5 Section 3.0 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 3-1 Purpose and Proposed Actions ...................................................................................................... 3-1 Project Components ............................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.1 Proposed Dwelling Units .......................................................................................................... 3-2 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx ii Table of Contents 3.2.2 Project Access/Parking ............................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.3 Architectural Design .................................................................................................................. 3-4 3.2.4 Conceptual Landscape Plan .................................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.5 Project Construction .................................................................................................................. 3-5 3.2.6 Discretionary Approvals ........................................................................................................... 3-6 Section 4.0 Environmental Impact Analysis ...................................................................................... 4-1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................................ 4-3 Agriculture and Forest Resources ................................................................................................. 4-9 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................. 4-12 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................................... 4-24 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................ 4-29 Energy ..................................................................................................................................................... 4-34 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................................... 4-38 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................................ 4-45 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................. 4-52 Hydrology and Water Quality ....................................................................................................... 4-59 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................................... 4-70 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................. 4-78 Noise ........................................................................................................................................................ 4-80 Population and Housing .................................................................................................................. 4-96 Public Services .................................................................................................................................... 4-98 Recreation .......................................................................................................................................... 4-103 Transportation ................................................................................................................................. 4-105 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 4-110 Utilities and Service Systems ..................................................................................................... 4-113 Wildfire ............................................................................................................................................... 4-121 Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................................ 4-124 Section 5.0 References ............................................................................................................................... 5-1 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx iii Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2-1 Shaffer Park Center – Existing Tenants ...................................................................................................... 2-3 3-1 Summary of Changes to Orange-Olive Specific Plan ............................................................................. 3-1 3-2 Proposed Development (Phase II) ................................................................................................................ 3-2 3-3 Proposed Open Space (Phase II) ................................................................................................................... 3-3 4-1 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin ........................................ 4-14 4-2 Existing Emissions ............................................................................................................................................. 4-15 4-3 South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality Significance Thresholds ............. 4-16 4-4 Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (Lbs/Day) ..................................................... 4-17 4-5 Local Significance Threshold Emissions .................................................................................................. 4-18 4-6 Peak Daily Operational Emissions .............................................................................................................. 4-19 4-7 Archaeological and Historic Studies Near the Project Site ............................................................... 4-30 4-8 Energy Use During Construction ................................................................................................................. 4-36 4-9 Energy Use During Operations ..................................................................................................................... 4-36 4-10 Fossil Localities Near the Project Site ....................................................................................................... 4-44 4-11 Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions .......................................................................................................... 4-46 4-12 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Construction .............................................................. 4-46 4-13 Estimated Gross and Net Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Project Operation .............................................................................................................................................................. 4-47 4-14 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern .............................................................................................................. 4-65 4-15 Proposed Project General Plan Consistency Analysis ........................................................................ 4-72 4-16 Summary of Short-Term Ambient Noise Level Measurements ...................................................... 4-81 4-17 Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix ........................................................................................................ 4-84 4-18 Exterior Noise Standards ................................................................................................................................ 4-86 4-19 Construction Noise Levels at Noise-Sensitive Uses ............................................................................. 4-88 4-20 Vibration Damage Threshold Criteria ....................................................................................................... 4-91 4-21 Vibration Annoyance Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 4-92 4-22 Vibration Levels For Construction Equipment ...................................................................................... 4-92 4-23 Vibration Annoyance Criteria At Sensitive Uses ................................................................................... 4-93 4-24 Structural Damage Criteria at Sensitive Uses ........................................................................................ 4-94 4-25 Project Trip Generation ................................................................................................................................ 4-106 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx iv Table of Contents LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Follows Page 1-1 Regional Location ................................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1-2 Local Vicinity ......................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 2-1 Aerial Photograph ............................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2-2 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations .......................................................................................... 2-4 2-3 Existing Zoning Designations.......................................................................................................................... 2-4 3-1 Conceptual Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3-2a Conceptual Planting Plan .................................................................................................................................. 3-2 3-2b Conceptual Landscape Plan ............................................................................................................................. 3-2 3-2c Conceptual Open Space Plan ........................................................................................................................... 3-2 3-3a Plan 1 Front Elevations ..................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3-3b Plan 2 Front Elevations ..................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3-3c Plan 3 Front Elevations ..................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3-4a–c Conceptual Building Elevations ..................................................................................................................... 3-4 3-5 Site Perspective .................................................................................................................................................... 3-4 3-6 Conceptual Lighting Plan .................................................................................................................................. 3-4 3-7 Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan ................................................................................................................... 3-4 3-8 Conceptual Grading Plan .................................................................................................................................. 3-5 3-9 Conceptual Utility Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 3-6 3-10 Proposed Zone Change ...................................................................................................................................... 3-6 4-1a–f Views of the Project Site (Phase II Area).................................................................................................... 4-5 4-2 Fault Locations .................................................................................................................................................... 4-39 4-3 Noise Monitoring Locations .......................................................................................................................... 4-81 4-4 Hourly Noise Levels at the Western Project Boundary along North Orange Olive Road ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4-81 4-5 Hourly Noise Levels at the Southern Project Boundary Along East Grove Avenue ............... 4-82 4-6 Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................................................. 4-106 APPENDICES Appendix A Orange-Olive Specific Plan, revised July 2020 (Phase II) B Air Quality, Energy, and GHG Modeling Data C Geotechnical Evaluation D Hazards and Hazardous Materials D1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment D2 EDR Record Search E Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan F Noise Monitoring Results G Traffic Memorandum H Fire Flow Study Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx v Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS A-1 Agriculture zone AB Assembly Bill ACM asbestos-containing materials ADT Average daily trips af acre-feet AM Ante meridian (morning) APN Assessor’s Parcel Number AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BMP best management practice BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe C-1 Limited Business zone CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalARP California Accidental Release Prevention Program CalEEMod California Emission Estimator Model CalFire California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention CALGreen Code California Green Building Standards Code CalOSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CDMG California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology CEQA California Environmental Quality Act cfs cubic feet per second CGS California Geological Survey CH4 methane CMP Congestion Management Program CNEL community noise equivalent level CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CWA Clean Water Act DAMP Drainage Area Management Plan dBA A-weighted decibel d/D flow depth to diameter ratio DOE Department of Education DOF Department of Finance DOGGR Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control du/ac dwelling units per acre DWR Department of Water Resources EDR Environmental Data Resources e.g. exempli gratia (for example) ESA Environmental Site Assessment et seq. et sequens (and what follows) FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIND Facility INformation Detail Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx vi Table of Contents FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG Greenhouse Gas gpd gallons per day gpcd gallons per capita per day Greenbook Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction GWP global warming potential HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HFCs hydrofluorocarbons HVAC Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning HWCA Hazardous Waste Control Act ICC International Code Council i.e. id est (in other words) in/sec inches per second IS Initial Study IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers JWA John Wayne Airport LBP lead-based paint lbs/day pounds per day LDR Low Density Residential Leq equivalent noise level LI Light Industrial Lmax highest A-weighted sound level LMDR Low Medium Density Residential Lmin lowest A-weighted sound level LOS level of service LST localized significance thresholds M-1 Light Manufacturing zone MATES IV Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study IV MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MEI maximally exposed individual MH Mobile Home Residential zone MLD most likely descendant MM Mitigation Measure MND Mitigated Negative Declaration MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MRZ Mineral Resources Zone MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System msl mean sea level MTCO2e Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent N2O nitrous oxide N/A Not Applicable NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan NHMLAC Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County No. number NO2 nitrogen dioxide NOD Notice of Determination Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx vii Table of Contents NOI Notice of Intent NOx nitrogen oxides NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRHP National Register of Historic Places O3 Ozone OCALUC Orange County Airport Land Use Commission OCSD Orange County Sanitation District OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OCWD Orange County Water District OEHHA Office of Environmental Health and Hazards Assessment OFD Orange Fire Department OPD Orange Police Department OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration OS-P Open Space Park OUSD Orange Unified School District P Public Institution zone PC Planned Community zone PFCs perfluorocarbons PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PM Post meridian (afternoon) PM10 Respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers or less PM2.5 Fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less PPV peak particle velocity PRD Permit Registration Documents R-1-5 Single-Family Residential zone R-1-8 Single-Family Residential 8,000 sf zone R-2-6 Duplex Residential 6000 sf zone R-2-7 Duplex Residential 7000 sf zone R-2-7 Duplex Residential 8000 sf zone R-3 Multiple Family Residential zone R-A Resource Area RCP Regional Comprehensive Plan RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act REC recognized environmental condition RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment RMS root-mean square RR Regulatory Requirement RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District sf square feet SF6 sulfur hexafluoride S-G Sand and Gravel zone SO2 sulfur dioxide SoCAB South Coast Air Basin SOx sulfur oxides SR State Route SRA Source Receptor Area Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx viii Table of Contents SRRE Source Reduction and Recycling Element SWP State Water Project SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TAC toxic air contaminant TDM transportation demand management TGD Technical Guidance Document TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TSF thousand square feet tpd tons per day TSIP Transportation System Improvement Program USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USFS United States Forest Service USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VdB vibration decibel VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone VOC volatile organic compound WAP Williamson Act Program WDR Waste Discharge Requirements WQMP Water Quality Management Plan ZC Zone Change Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 1-1 Introduction INTRODUCTION Cohen Living Trust, as the Project Applicant, is proposing the development of the Cohen Property (proposed Project or Project), which would include the construction of 32 dwelling units, along with internal drive aisles and common open space, on a 2.9-acre parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 374-431-17) in the City of Orange. The Cohen Property would be developed as Phase II of the Orange- Olive Specific Plan. The Orange-Olive Residential Development Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND No. 1837-14) was prepared for Phase I of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan, located adjacent and to the north of Phase II, which consisted of 25 residential units on 2.33 acres. MND No. 1837-14 was adopted with approval of the Phase I project on November 10, 2015, and Phase I has since been constructed. The Project consists of (1) development of the Cohen Property (Phase II of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan) and (2) required changes to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan for development of the Phase II Project, including extending the southern boundary of the Specific Plan area to East Grove Avenue. For clarity, the proposed Cohen Property is referred to as the “proposed Project” and/or “Phase II”, and changes to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan are referred to as Zone Change (ZC) No. 1297-19 (Amendment to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan). A subsequent Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is proposed for the Project. The subsequent IS/MND evaluates the proposed Project (Phase II) and the Orange-Olive Specific Plan Amendment in conjunction with the proposed entitlement requests, which include: (1) Zone Change (ZC) No. 1297-19 (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan); (2) Major Site Plan Review No. 0969-19; (3) Tentative Tract Map No. 0049-19; (4) Design Review No. 4969-19; and (5) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 1865-19. An action that has the potential for causing a physical change in the environment is considered a “project” under Section 21065 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.) and Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.). A “project” is required to go through an environmental review process in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Lead Agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility of carrying out or approving a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. The City of Orange (City) is the Lead Agency since the proposed Project would be located in the City and would require approvals from the City. As the Lead Agency, the City has the responsibility for completing the environmental review process for the Project in accordance with CEQA and certification or adoption of the environmental documentation prior to the approval of the Project. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE In accordance with Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study (IS) has been prepared for the proposed Project and its associated discretionary approvals. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 1-2 Introduction CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, states the following with respect to a Subsequent Negative Declaration: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. The City has determined that a Subsequent IS/MND is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed Cohen Property Project, because changes outside the scope of the original project are proposed and were not covered in the original MND (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15164). The IS indicates that the potentially significant impacts of the Project can be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of mitigation measures, and therefore, the Project requires preparation of an MND. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 1-3 Introduction This Subsequent IS/MND serves as the environmental document that presents the analysis of Project impacts on each of the environmental issue areas in the CEQA Environmental Checklist provided in Section 4.0. This document will serve to inform City decision makers, representatives of affected trustee and responsible agencies, and other interested parties of the potential environmental effects that may occur with approval and implementation of the proposed Project. PROJECT SUMMARY 1.3.1 Location The approximate 2.9-acre Project site (Phase II) is located in the City of Orange, in Orange County, California. The site is located east of North Orange Olive Road and north of East Grove Avenue in the northwestern section of the City. The site is 1.0 mile west of State Route (SR) 55, 1.4 miles east of SR 57, and 1.9 miles south of SR 91. The site is east of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks, across from North Orange Olive Road, and north of Shaffer Park (currently under renovation). Existing residential uses are located immediately to the north and east of the site. See Exhibit 1-1, Regional Location and Exhibit 1-2, Local Vicinity. 1.3.2 Project Proponent David Cohen Cohen Living Trust 4922 East Somerton Avenue Orange, CA 92867 (714) 401-8200 1.3.3 Existing General Plan and Zoning Land Use Designation: LMDR - Low Medium Density Residential 6-15 du/ac Zoning Classification: C-1 - Limited Business 1.3.4 Existing Setting Project Site: The Project site (Phase II) is currently developed with a shopping center (Shaffer Park Center) consisting of two commercial/retail buildings, with the larger building occupied by several thrift stores, offices (Orange County Department of Education), and an alternative school (Project Hope School) and the smaller building occupied by a thrift store (Earth Wise) and a restaurant (Taqueria Los Olivos). Site addresses include 1997 North Orange Olive Road and 301 through 343 East Grove Avenue. Surrounding Land Uses: The Project site (Phase II) is surrounded by residential uses to the north (Phase I of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan) and east, Shaffer Park to the south across East Grove Avenue, and light industrial uses to the west across from North Orange Olive Road and the BNSF railroad tracks. Section 2.4, Planning Context, provides a description of existing General Plan designations and zoning for the surrounding land uses. Regional Location Exhibit 1-1 (Rev: 11-18-2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_RL.pdf A N G E L E S N A T I O N A L F O R E S T C A M P P E N D L E T O N CLEVELAND LakeMathews CastaicLake Santa Clara Riv e r P A C I F I C O C E A N LakeElsinore San GabrielReservoir CanyonLake ChatsworthReservoir NATIONAL FOREST Project Location San BernardinoRiverside §¨5 ST72§¨405 §¨15 §¨210 §¨105 §¨10 §¨5 §¨710§¨110 §¨215 §¨605 §¨5 §¨210 §¨15 §¨10 ST14 ST1 ST138 ST73 ST118 ST22 ST91 ST2 ST18 ST30 ST19 ST241 ST74 ST90 ST261 ST170 ST142 ST39 ST107 ST134 ST110 ST60 ST213 ST71 ST55 ST133 ST57 ST187 ST710 ST241 ST2 ST91 £¤395 £¤101 RiversideSan Diego Los AngelesOrange Anaheim Santa Viejo Beach Santa Rancho Rialto Rancho Corona Downey Irvine Carson Ontario Mission Clarita Hesperia San Juan Whittier Lakewood Pasadena Glendale Riverside Cucamonga Margarita Santa Ana Hawthorne Capistrano Huntington Costa Mesa Buena Park Seal Beach Long Beach Victorville Westminster Yorba Linda West Covina San Clemente Laguna Beach Palos Verdes Santa Monica Lake Elsinore West Hollywood D:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_RL_20190612.mxd10 0 105Miles² Orange Cohen Property Taft Elementary School St. Paul'sLutheran School Covenant Christian School Fletcher Elementary School Saint Norbert School Saint Pauls Lutheran School Union Pacific RRBurlington Northern Santa Fe RlwySPRRTaft AveGlassell StShaffer StMeats AveN Orange Olive RdCambridge StTrenton Ave Chestnut Ave Fletcher Ave Case StHeim Ave Grove AvePacific StGlendora Ave Alley Cumberland Rd Palmdale AveNeville StBristol Ln Blueridge Ave Glendale Ave Del Mar Ave Amber Ave Vista del Playa Ave Northumberland RdBuckeyewood Ave Vista del Gaviota Ave Freedom Ave Chouteau StPine StWoodside StCully Dr Leslie WayAmerican WayHarwood StWinlock StLevers Pl OdonnellWaySouthern Ave Cleveland StMillbrae StGlennwood StWoodstock Ave Greenway Ave T aftCirEmerson Ave Glendale Dr Bellbrook StSilverwood StBay w ood Av e Ridgewood StFel lo w s D r Briardale Ave Ashwood StMaplewood StFerndale AveBeechwoodStHearthsideSt C o n c o r d Av eFlandersStWiddows WayGates Ave Saint Thomas CirGenessee StHartman StCandlewood Ave Lindenholz StComstock StMarquart StKeokuk StWaterberry StNamuria StLove LnBurton Ave Widdows WayLindenholz StBriardale Ave Buckeyewood Ave Chouteau StMaplewood StBlueridge Ave Emerson Ave C o n c o r d A v e Briardale Ave Del Mar Ave E Grove Ave Silverwood StMaplewoodStWoodside StGrove Ave Shaffer Park D:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_LV_20190612.mxd² Local Vicinity Cohen Property Exhibit 1-2 (Rev: 11-18-2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_LV.pdf 750 0 750375Feet Specific Plan Area Phase I Area Phase II Area (Project Site) Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 1-4 Introduction 1.3.5 Proposed Development The proposed Cohen Property would involve construction of a 32-unit residential development at a density of 11.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The existing commercial/retail buildings, drive aisles, and surface parking areas would be demolished to accommodate the proposed Project. The proposed two-story single-family detached dwelling units would consist of three different floor plans, with the units ranging in size from 1,891 to 2,050 square feet (sf). Furthermore, the proposed Project includes a total of 92 parking spaces and 19,535 sf of homeowners association (HOA) common open space. Additional details on the Project are provided in Section 3.0 of this Subsequent IS/MND. 1.3.6 Required Approvals The City of Orange would approve the following discretionary actions for the implementation of the proposed Project:  Zone Change No. 1297-19 (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan)  Major Site Plan Review No. 0969-19  Tentative Tract Map No. 0049-19  Design Review No. 4969-19  Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1865-19 In addition, the following ministerial permits would be sought from the City:  Demolition Permit for existing buildings and site improvements  Grading Permit  Building Permits  Occupancy Permits  Encroachment Permit for driveway, sidewalk, and utility connections on adjacent streets The Project also would require coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction General Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The State CEQA Guidelines and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines require the preparation of an IS/MND if a project would result in potentially significant effects, but (1) revisions to the project are made by or agreed to by the applicant before the IS/MND is released for public review and these revisions would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur and (2) there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15070[b]). As stated above under Section 1.2, the City has determined that a Subsequent IS/MND is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed Project, because changes outside the scope of the original project are proposed and were not covered in the original MND. Based on the environmental checklist prepared for the proposed Project and supporting environmental analysis (provided in Section 4.0 of this Subsequent IS/MND), with compliance with applicable regulations, the Project would have no impact or less than significant impacts on the following environmental issue areas: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 1-5 Introduction Energy, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. The proposed Project’s impacts on the following issue areas would be significant and would require the implementation of mitigation measures: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise. All impacts would be avoided or reduced to less than significant levels after mitigation. Per Section 21082.1(c) of CEQA and Section 15074(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Orange, as the Lead Agency, has managed the preparation of this Subsequent IS/MND and, based on its review, has determined that the document reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis. According to the State CEQA Guidelines and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, the City may adopt an MND for the proposed Project because, with the incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures, the Project’s potentially significant environmental impacts would be eliminated or reduced to levels considered less than significant. PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS Upon completion of this Subsequent IS/MND, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the Subsequent IS/MND was distributed to responsible agencies and other potentially affected agencies and interested individuals. The NOI was published in the newspaper name, on XXX, XX 2020. The NOI and Subsequent IS/MND are also available for public review on the City’s website: https://www.cityoforange.org/292/Project-NoticesRelated-Environmental-Doc Hard copies of the documents would be available for public review at the following locations:  City of Orange Community Development Department 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92866 (714) 744-2225 Hours: 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM Monday through Thursday and alternating Fridays  Orange Public Library and History Center 407 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92866 (714) 288-2400 Hours: 10:00 AM to 9:00 PM Monday through Wednesday 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM Thursday through Saturday Closed Sunday  Taft Branch Library 740 E. Taft Avenue Orange, California 92865 (714) 288-2430 Hours: 2:00 PM to 9:00 PM Monday through Wednesday 1:00 PM to 6:00 PM Thursday through Saturday Closed Sunday Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 1-6 Introduction A 30-day public review period has been established for the Subsequent IS/MND beginning on XXXXX, 2020 and ending on XXXX, 2020, in accordance with Section 15073 of the State CEQA Guidelines. In reviewing the Subsequent IS/MND, affected public agencies and interested members of the public should focus on the adequacy of the document in identifying and analyzing the potential environmental impacts and the ways in which the potentially significant effects of the Project can be avoided or mitigated. Comments on the Subsequent IS/MND and the analysis contained herein may be sent to: Monique Schwartz Associate Planner City of Orange 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92866 (714) 744-7224 mschwartz@cityoforange.org Following receipt and evaluation of comments from agencies, organizations, and/or individuals, the City of Orange will determine whether any substantial new environmental issues have been raised or substantial comments have been provided that would require revisions to the Subsequent IS/MND. If so, further documentation may be required. The proposed Project and the adequacy of this Subsequent IS/MND will be considered by the Orange Planning Commission and the City Council during scheduled public hearings. If the City finds, on the basis of the whole record before it (including this Subsequent IS/MND and any comments received) that there is no substantial evidence that the Project would have a significant effect on the environment, it may adopt the Subsequent MND. If the City Council adopts the Subsequent MND and approves the Project, a Notice of Determination (NOD) will be filed with the Orange County Clerk. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE In preparation of this Subsequent IS/MND, relevant documents have been cited and incorporated, in accordance with Sections 15148 and 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The following reports and/or studies are applicable to the proposed Project and are hereby incorporated by reference.  City of Orange General Plan  City of Orange Municipal Code, which includes the City’s Zoning Code (Title 17)  Orange-Olive Residential Development Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND No. 1837- 14) These documents are available for review at the Planning Division of the City of Orange, Community Development Department (refer to address and hours provided above). They are also available on the City’s website at: https://www.cityoforange.org/292/Project-NoticesRelated-Environmental- Doc SCHEDULED PUBLIC MEETINGS OR HEARINGS Public meetings and hearings for the Project have not been scheduled at this time. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 2-1 Environmental Setting PROJECT LOCATION The approximate 2.9-acre proposed Project site (Phase II) is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue in the City of Orange in Orange County, California. The Project site is located immediately to the south of the existing Orange-Olive Specific Plan (Phase I). The Project site is located north of Shaffer Park, east of the BNSF railroad tracks across from North Orange Olive Road, and 160 feet west of Shaffer Street. The site consists of APN 374-431-17 and has approximately 263 feet of frontage on North Orange Olive Road and 487 feet of frontage on East Grove Avenue. A 5-foot wide easement along the northern property boundary has been granted to Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and an overlapping 10-foot easement has been granted to Southern California Edison Company (where overhead power lines on wooden poles are present and extend from North Orange Olive Road to Shaffer Street). The site is currently developed with a shopping center and associated improvements (i.e., drive aisles and parking areas). See Exhibit 2-1, Aerial Photograph. BACKGROUND The Orange-Olive Specific Plan (Specific Plan) is a regulatory document, adopted by ordinance by the City of Orange (City) and serves as the adopted zoning for the property located at 2025 North Orange- Olive Road (Phase I) and 301 East Grove Road (Phase II). The City of Orange has used specific plans as tools to achieve the customized development of individual parcels within a broader land use context. The purpose of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan is to regulate development within the specific plan boundaries in order to ensure orderly development and compatibility with existing uses in the surrounding areas. Uses, development plans, site plans and any subsequent development activity within the Project site must be consistent with both the Specific Plan and the City’s Orange General Plan (General Plan). The Orange-Olive Specific Plan was originally developed to accommodate a 25-unit detached residential development on a constrained infill development site (Phase I). An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the Orange-Olive Residential Development (renamed to Irving House), which was approved on November 10, 2015 and has since been constructed. An amendment to the Specific Plan is proposed to incorporate the adjacent property to the south of Phase I, referred to as Phase II, or the proposed Project. Phase II of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan proposes a 32-unit detached residential development consistent with Phase I, for a total of 57 units within the amended boundary of the Specific Plan. The amended Orange-Olive Specific Plan incorporates the conceptual site plans, elevations, and landscape plans for each phase and establishes development standards and design guidelines to provide guidance and limits for future adjustments to the development plan. Shaffer Park Orange Fire Station No. 3Burlington Northern Santa Fe RlwyE Meats Ave N Orange Olive RdN Cleveland StE Buckeyewood Ave E Glendale Dr E Blueridge Ave E Grove Ave N Shaffer StD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_Aerial_20190612.mxd² Aerial Photograph Cohen Property Exhibit 2-1 (Rev: 11-18-2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Aerial.pdf 200 0 200100Feet Specific Plan Area Phase I Area Phase II Area (Project Site) Aerial Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe 2017 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 2-2 Environmental Setting The City of Orange was the lead agency responsible for preparing the IS/MND for the Irving House development and continues to be the lead agency with responsibility for approving the current Cohen Property Project. The City has determined that a Subsequent IS/MND is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed Cohen Property Project. CEQA Guidelines require the completion of either a Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration or Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration when changes outside the scope of the original project are proposed and were not covered in the original Mitigated Negative Declaration (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15164). This Subsequent IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and its guidelines for implementation. The IS/MND for the Orange-Olive Residential Development is hereby incorporated by reference and supports this Subsequent IS/MND. This Subsequent IS/MND incorporates previously approved measures from the IS/MND for the Orange-Olive Residential Development. Proposed changes to these mitigation measures are shown with strikeout for deleted text and underline for new text. Where appropriate, new mitigation measures and regulatory requirements are provided to reduce Project impacts to a less than significant level. EXISTING SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS 2.3.1 Site Access Vehicle access to the Cohen Property site is provided by two driveways on North Orange Olive Road and three driveways on East Grove Avenue. North Orange Olive Road is a four-lane undivided road that extends northeasterly for approximately 2.0 miles from Glassell Street (on the south) to Riverdale Avenue (on the north). Along the site, East Grove Avenue is a short two-lane local street from North Orange Olive Road to Shaffer Street. SR 55 is located approximately 1.0 mile east of the site, SR 57 is 1.4 miles to the west, and SR 91 is 1.9 miles to the north. 2.3.2 Existing Site Conditions The Cohen Property site is developed with a multi-tenant shopping center consisting of two commercial/retail buildings: a single-story 34,720-square-foot building at the northern portion of the site and a single-story 2,630-square foot building at the southwestern corner (near the intersection of North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue). The larger building is a wood- framed stucco structure on a concrete slab-on-grade foundation that was built in 1964 and is divided into multiple tenant spaces. The smaller building is also a wood-framed stucco structure on a concrete slab-on-grade foundation that was built in the late 1980s to early 1990s. Table 2-1 lists the existing tenants of the Shaffer Park Center. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 2-3 Environmental Setting TABLE 2-1 SHAFFER PARK CENTER – EXISTING TENANTS Address Floor Area (sf) Tenant Larger Retail Building 301 Grove Ave 1,650 3-Day Thrift 303 Grove Ave 10,000 Family Thrift Store/California Vintage Marketplace 305 Grove Ave 5,650 Flashbacks Mercantile 321 Grove Ave 1,200 Orange County Department of Education 325 Grove Ave 2,000 Reclaimed 335 Grove Ave 2,000 VC 305* 337 Grove Ave 2,000 Creative Arts and Parties 343 Grove Ave 10,220 Project Hope School Total 34,720 Smaller Retail Building 1997 Orange Olive Road, Unit A 1,315 Earth Wise Second-Hand Store 1997 Orange Olive Road, Unit B 1,315 Taqueria Los Olivos Total 2,630 sf – square feet; * - appears closed The southern section of the site consists of an asphalt-paved surface parking lot. A service drive aisle extends from the northern access driveway on North Orange Olive Road along the northern boundary of the site and turns south along the eastern boundary to the eastern access driveway on East Grove Avenue. The site contains ornamental trees (e.g., Mexican fan palm and ficus trees), shrubs (e.g., boxwood and day lilies) and groundcover along the setback areas on North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue, at parking fingers/islands, and near the existing buildings. Jacaranda trees are also present in tree wells along East Grove Avenue. Block walls line the northern and eastern perimeters of the site, with a wrought iron fencing and sliding gate at the western end of the larger building and a gate across the northern section of the eastern drive aisle. 2.3.3 Site Topography The Project site is relatively flat. According to USGS maps, the site has an elevation of approximately 200 feet above mean sea level (msl) and slopes slightly to the southwest. 2.3.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Development The Project site is located within a highly urbanized portion of the City of Orange that includes a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses. As shown in Exhibit 2-1, the Project site is bordered by North Orange Olive Road on the west and East Grove Avenue on the south. Farther west of North Orange Olive Road are the BNSF railroad tracks and light industrial uses (e.g., BASF Corporation, The SoCo Group, Troas Enterprises, Contract Installations, United Industries, Renegade Wheels, Positive Concepts, and Jergens). South of East Grove Avenue is Shaffer Park. Beyond Shafer Park to the south are Fire Station No. 3, and single- and multi-family units on Blueridge Avenue. As previously indicated, the proposed Project is Phase II of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan with Phase I located immediately to the north of the Project site. Phase I consists of the newly-constructed 25- unit Irving House development with for-sale, single-family, detached units. The Project site is bound by a lot developed with two single-family detached units and three lots developed with a single- Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 2-4 Environmental Setting family detached unit each. Older single-family detached residences are found farther east, northeast and southeast of the site. Additionally, the site is located less than half a mile northwest of the Fairmeadow Eichler Tract, which is one of three mid-century modern Eichler tracts recognized as a historic district in the City. A multi-family residential development is located to the north of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan boundary. PLANNING CONTEXT 2.4.1 General Plan Designation The Project site is currently designated in the Land Use Policy Map of the City of Orange General Plan as LMDR (6-15 du/ac). This designation “provides for both detached and attached single-family homes on smaller lots, as well as duplexes and some mobile homes, multi-family townhouses, condominiums, and apartments” (Orange 2010a). The land use designations in the vicinity of the Project site include OS-P (Open Space Park) to the south, LDR (Low Density Residential) to the east and northeast, LMDR to the north and east, and LI (Light Industrial) to the west. Exhibit 2-2 shows the existing land use designations on and near the site. 2.4.2 Zoning Designation In the City’s Zoning Map, the site is zoned as C-1 (Limited Business). This zone permits lower intensity office, general retail, and service commercial businesses (Orange Municipal Code [OMC] Section 17.18.020). Adjacent zoning designations include C-1 to the south, R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) to the north, M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to the west, R-2-6 (Residential Duplex 6000 sf) to the east, and R-1-8 (Single-Family Residential 8,000 sf) to the east and northeast. Exhibit 2-3 shows the existing zoning designations on and near the site. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS 2.5.1 Air Quality Air quality in Orange County is regulated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), which is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). The SCAQMD has divided the SoCAB into 38 source receptor areas (SRA), with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each SRA. The site is within the Central Orange County SRA (SRA 17), which has a monitoring station in Anaheim-Pampas Lane Monitoring Station, located at 1603 West Pampas Lane, approximately 5 miles west of the Project site. Based on monitored air pollutant concentrations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) designate an area’s status in attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), respectively, for selected criteria pollutants. The pollutants measured at the Anaheim- Pampas Lane Station include O3, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. 2.5.2 Vegetation and Wildlife The Project site is developed with commercial/retail buildings, drive aisles, and parking areas, with limited landscaped areas. On-site trees and landscaping include Mexican fan palm and ficus trees, boxwood, day lilies, and groundcover at scattered locations throughout the site. These landscaped Shaffer Park Orange Fire Station No. 3Burlington Northern Santa Fe RlwyE Meats Ave N Orange Olive RdN Cleveland StE Buckeyewood Ave E Glendale Dr E Blueridge Ave E Grove Ave N Shaffer StD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_Existing_GP_LandUse_20190612.mxd² Existing General Plan Land Use Designations Cohen Property Exhibit 2-2 (Rev: 11-18-2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Existing_GP_LandUse.pdf 200 0 200100Feet Specific Plan Area Phase I Area Phase II Area (Project Site) Land Use Designation I - Industrial Max 0.75 FAR LDR - Low Density Residential 2-6 DU/AC LMDR - Low Medium Residential 6-15 DU/AC MDR - Medium Density Residential 15-24 DU/AC OS-P - Open Space Park Data Source: City of Orange General PlanAerial Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe 2017 Shaffer Park Orange Fire Station No. 3 M-2 R-3 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8 C-1 C-1 R-2-6 R-3 R-3 Burlington Northern Santa Fe RlwyE Meats Ave N Orange Olive RdN Cleveland StE Buckeyewood Ave E Glendale Dr E Blueridge Ave E Grove Ave N Shaffer StD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_Existing_Zoning_20190612.mxd² Existing Zoning Designations Cohen Property Exhibit 2-3 (Rev: 11-18-2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Existing_Zoning.pdf 200 0 200100Feet Specific Plan Area Phase I Area Phase II Area (Project Site) Zoning Designation C-1 - Limited Business M-1 - Light Manufacturing R-1-8 - Single Family Residential 8000 sq ft R-2-6 - Residential Duplex 6000 sq ft R-3 - Residential Multiple Family Data Source: City of Orange Public Works GIS Section, 3/16/2016Aerial Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe 2017 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 2-5 Environmental Setting areas and vegetation provide habitat for common animal species, such as small mammals, birds, small reptiles, and insects that are typically found in urban areas. 2.5.3 Cultural Resources While the smaller commercial/retail building was built in the late 1980s to early 1990s, the larger building was built in 1964 and is over 50 years of age. Both buildings are not included on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), nor are they identified by the City as a historic object, historic site, or significant historic resource. The site is not located within proposed locally designated historic district (Orange 2018i). 2.5.4 Geology The Project site is within the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province in Southern California. Based on a subsurface investigation by Twining Consulting, the earth materials consist of an underlain by old alluvial fan deposits extending to the total depth of exploration. The alluvial deposits comprise predominantly of sandy lean clay, Silty Sand, and poorly-graded sand with silt (Twining 2019). 2.5.5 Hydrology Under the existing conditions, drainage on the site consists of sheet flow from the buildings, drive aisles, and surface parking areas towards East Grove Avenue and through a ribbon gutter and catch basins at the northern drive aisle for discharge into North Orange Olive Road. Stormwater then flows along the street gutters into a catch basin at the north side of East Grove Avenue near North Orange Olive Road. This catch basin is connected to a 30-inch storm drain line in East Grove Avenue that connects to a 6-foot by 4-foot culvert on North Orange Olive Road and that, in turn, discharges into the Buckeye/Collins Channel southwest of the site. The Buckeye/Collins Channel flows westerly and southwesterly and eventually ties into the Santa Ana River. According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Project site is within Flood Zone X (Other Areas), which indicates that the site is located outside of the 0.2 percent annual chance flood area (or 500-year floodplain) (FEMA 2009). 2.5.6 Rare and Unique Resources Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(c), the environmental setting should identify any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable general, specific, or regional plans, while focusing on rare or unique regional resources that would be impacted by the project. The Project proposes to demolish an existing shopping center and to construct 32 dwelling units on the site. The Project would not require a General Plan Amendment but would require a Zone Change from C-1 to R-3(SP) to make the zoning of the site consistent with its land use designation. Based on existing developed conditions of the Project site and surrounding area, the Project site does not contain any resources that are considered rare or unique to the region. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 2-6 Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-1 Project Description PURPOSE AND PROPOSED ACTIONS As indicated above in Section 1.1, the proposed Project consists of (1) development of the Cohen Property (Phase II of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan) and (2) required changes to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan for development of the proposed Project (Phase II). For clarity, the proposed Cohen Property is referred to as the “proposed Project” and/or “Phase II”, and changes to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan are referred to as Zone Change (ZC) No. 1297-19 (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan). A subsequent MND is proposed to evaluate the proposed Project (Phase II) and the Zone Change (Amendment to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan) in conjunction with the proposed entitlement requests, which include the following discretionary approvals required from the City of Orange: (1) Zone Change (ZC) No. 1297-19 (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan); (2) Major Site Plan Review No. 0969-19; (3) Tentative Tract Map No. 0049-19; (4) Design Review No. 4969-19; and (5) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 1865-19. Actions associated with the Zone Change (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan), which is required for development of the proposed Project (Phase II), are as follows:  Adjust the Specific Plan boundary to include the Phase II area, which is defined as the 2.9-net- acre Project site located at 301 East Grove Avenue in the City of Orange.  Update the Specific Plan text and associated exhibits to reflect any changes resulting from the proposed Project (Phase II). The changes are summarized below in Table 3-1 and the amended Orange-Olive Specific Plan is included in its entirety as Appendix A. TABLE 3-1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO ORANGE-OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN Development Name Phase I Phase II Zone Change (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan) Irving House Cohen Property Development One residential development One residential development Two residential developments. Delineation of Phase I (initial development) and Phase II as proposed development. Net area 2.33 acres 2.90 acres 5.23 acres Total dwelling units 25 32 57 Density 10.7 dus/ac 11.0 dus/ac 10.9 dus/ac Parking Garage: 50 Guest parking: 22 Total: 72 Garage: 64 (minimum 2 spaces/unit) Guest Parking: 28 (0.88 spaces/unit) Total: 92 (2.88 spaces/unit) Garage: 114 (Phase I + Phase II) Guest parking: 50 (Phase I + Phase II) Total: 164 Source: Orange-Olive Specific Plan (Appendix A to this Initial Study). Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-2 Project Description PROJECT COMPONENTS 3.2.1 Proposed Dwelling Units The proposed Cohen Property Project involves demolition and removal of the existing shopping center and associated parking areas and site improvements; preparation of the site for redevelopment (e.g., clearing and grading); and construction of 32 single-family detached, two-story dwelling units; internal drive aisles; and common open space on the 2.9-acre site. Table 3-2 provides the breakdown of the proposed dwelling units. The proposed Project would have a development density of 11.0 units per acre, which is within the allowable density range for the LMDR designation of 6 to 15 units per acre. TABLE 3-2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (PHASE II) Floor Plan Number of Units Floor Area (sf) Total Floor Area (sf) P1 11 1,891 20,801 P2 9 1,947 17,523 P3 12 2,050 24,600 Total 32 Total 62,924 sf – square feet Source: KTGY 2020. The proposed dwelling units would feature three different plans. The units with the P3 plan would be located along the northern and southern perimeters of the site, and the units with P1 and P2 plans would be interspersed at the eastern, western, and central portions of the site. The units along North Orange Olive Road would have either a side entrance or an entrance that faces toward an internal drive aisle. The units facing East Grove Avenue would have entrances that face East Grove Avenue; while all other proposed units would have side entrances or face the drive aisles internal to the site. Exhibits 3-1, Conceptual Site Plan, 3-2, Conceptual Landscape Plan, and 3-2a, Conceptual Planting Plan show the location of the proposed dwelling units, open space, landscape and planting, access driveway, and drive aisles. Exhibits 3-3a through 3-3c, Plan 1 Perspectives, Plan 2 Perspectives, and Plan 3 Perspectives, show design variations within each plan. Open Space and Landscaping The proposed Project’s overall open space consists of common landscape areas, private open space (yard), and common open space area. Common open space would be provided at one centralized location while private open spaces would occur in the form of rear and front yards for each unit. Common landscaped areas would be located at the Project street frontages and entry along East Grove Avenue, as well as throughout the interior of the Project site, buffering the residences from the interior roadways. Table 3-3 provides the breakdown of the proposed open space areas and Exhibit 3-2c, Conceptual Open Space Plan, shows the types and acreage of open space throughout the Project site. Additionally, the Project proposes a common open space area (1,563 sf) located directly at the end of the entry interior road. This common open space proposes amenities for the residences of the development, including shade structure, picnic tables, and barbeque. A total of 22,090 sf (approximately 690 sf per unit) of private open space is provided on the Project site. In addition, common landscape area, approximately 17,972 sf, in the form of frontage along Orange-Olive Road, (07/22/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Site_Plan.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Site_Plan_20200122.aiSource: KTGY Architecture + Planning, July 2020Exhibit 3-1Cohen Property Conceptual Site Plan Source: Studio PAD Landscape Architecture, May 202002040 80Feet(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Schematic_PlantingPlan.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Schematic_PlantingPlan_20200122.aiCohen Property Schematic Planting PlanExhibit 3-2a(1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(4)(5)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(24)(21)(22)(23)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)98765214311131415162112191820222810172425262723TE. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkOlea e. Wilsonii (Fruitless Olive)Type/FormPlatanus x acerifolia 'Columbia'Cupressus sempervirens (Italian Cypress)PLANTING LEGENDPALMSSymbolFloweringVerticalSpecimenLargeColumnarTrunkSingleSingleSingleSingleBotanical Name (Common Name)SuggestionsTristania conferta (Brisbane Box)BufferSingleSingleEriobotrya deflexa (Bronze Loquat)Arbutus 'Marina' (Strawberry Tree)StreetSize36" Box24" Box24" Box15 Gal15 Gal15 GalPhoenix dactylifera (Date Palm)VerticalSingle8-10' BTTREESLowMedLow(Reg 3)Qty.51617Med 25Med8Low4Low 39Myrtus communis ‘Boetica’ (Boetica Myrtle)CanopyWUCOLTotal Trees=114Handroanthus impetiginosus (Pink Trumpet in Parkways)Existing TreeJacaranda mimosifolia (jacaranda)Canopy--MedPer PlanVINES & ESPALIERSBougainvillea 'Red & White' Macfadyena unguis-cati Type/FormSymbolSizeSuggestions(Reg 3)Qty.WUCOLEspalier5 GalLow 61 Gal Low 7Vine(Bougainvillea) (Cat's Claw Vine)Schematic Planting PlanDavid Cohen40'Scale: 1" = 20'020'10'NOTES:1. Irrigation (including spray and/or drip) will be provided, in the Construction Document phase, and tobe installed per local California water regulations (AB1881) .2. Transformers, back-flow preventers & other above-ground utilities to be screened with landscapeas permitted per local codes & regulations.3. Landscape lighting (landscape up-lights, path lights/bollards, etc.) to be coordinated with ElectricalEngineer in future phase.4. The plant palette listed provides a list of plant material to select from when preparing finallandscape construction documents for this project. However, substitutions may be required due toavailability, soils tests, or other conditions.5. All trees within 5' of hardscape to be installed with deep root barriers.6. Trees planted along the fire access roadway and/or firefighter required walkway shall not impedethe required minimum 5'0” walkway width or the required fire apparatus vertical clearance of 13'-6”.The trees should be a type that the natural growth pattern would allow the required verticalclearance without reliance on regular maintenance of the tree canopies.SHRUBS and GROUND COVERAgave Blue GlowBlue Glow Agave Aloe 'Super Red' AloeRosmarinus p. Aeonium sp.AeoniumCarex divulsaBerkeley SedgeNassella pulchra Purple NeedlegrassMuhlenbergia rigensDeer GrassBougainvillea La Jolla La Jolla BougainvilleaDasylirion longissimumMexican Grass TreeCercis occidentalisWestern RedbudBaccharis pilularisCoyote Brush Yucca Bright StarBright Star YuccaJuncus patens JuncusEcheveria sp.EcheveriaSenecio m. Dianella revolutaFlax LilyLigustrum j. `Texanum` Wax Leaf PrivetSalvia greggii RedRed Texas SageWestringia fruticosaCoast RosemaryTecoma stansYellow BellsLantana 'New Gold' 'New Gold' Lantana Existing ParkwayTrees to RemainExisting Parkway Tree to be removedto allow for new project entry driveExisting ParkwayTrees to RemainVines on wall, per legendEspalier on wall,per legend'Huntington Carpet''Blue Chalk Sticks'Proposed tree Handroanthusimpetiginosus to match adjacentstreet trees or as approved by CityStaff.ROW / P.L.ROW / P.L. Source: Studio PAD Landscape Architecture, May 202002040 80Feet(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Conceptual_LandscapePlan.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Conceptual_LandscapePlan_20200122.aiExhibit 3-2bCohen Property Conceptual Landscape Plan3Central community open space area with built in BBQ Counter, wood shadestructure, 2 sided gas fireplace, Bike racks and lounge furniture for smallsocial events and group gatherings.Two community cluster mailboxes, per USPS review and approval.Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan.Enhanced paving at main project entry.Proposed and existing trees, per Planting Plan.Pedestrian natural color community sidewalk with light top-cast finish andsaw-cut joints.Accessible parking stall and striping, per Civil plans.Guest parking stall.Natural colored concrete driveway, with light broom finish and tooled joints.Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained.Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained.Property line per Civil Engineer plan.Public street R.O.W. per Civil Engineer plan.Existing public street sidewalk, per Civil plans.FDC's BFD's and Transformer to be screened with landscape, quantity andfinal locations to be determined per Civil Plans.5.9.8.7.6.4.3.2.1.LEGEND10.11.12.13.14.15.53631568111014392711111511101213911141111114918555Proposed BikeRack1515ROW / P.L.ROW / P.L.Existing Tree tobe Removed Source: Studio PAD Landscape Architecture, May 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Conceptual_OpenSpacePlan.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Conceptual_OpenSpacePlan_20200603.aiExhibit 3-2cCohen Property Conceptual Open Space Plan(1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(4)(5)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(24)(21)(22)(23)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)98765214311131415162112191820222810172425262723TE. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkO.S. HOA COMMON LANDSCAPEHOA MAINTAINED (Pervious)Takeoff: 17,972 sfO.S. HOA PROGRAMMED COMMON AREAHOA MAINTAINED (Min. 10` Dimension).Takeoff: 1,563 sfO.S. CITY PARKWAYS LANDSCAPEHOA MAINTAINED (Pervious)Takeoff: 3,095 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 1BY LOTTakeoff: 722 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 2HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 307 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 3HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 412 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 4HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 628 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 5HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 1Takeoff: 680 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 6HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 408 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 7HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 406 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 8HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 548 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 9HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 738 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 10HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 685 sfOPEN SPACE LEGENDO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 11HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 787 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 12HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 982 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 13HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 773 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 14HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 598 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 15HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 701 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 16HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 448 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 17HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 300 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 18HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 650 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 19HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 784 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 20HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 790 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 21HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 916 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 22HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 685 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 23HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 746 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 24HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 766 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 25HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 1000 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 26HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 845 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 27HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 1,042 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 28HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 1,035 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 29HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 1,120 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 30HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 610 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 31HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 307 sfO.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 32HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED.Takeoff: 671 sfOPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:TOTAL HOA COMMON OPEN SPACE = 19,535FS ‬(17,972 SF + 1,563 SF)TOTAL PRIVATE YARD OPEN SPACE= 22,090 SFTOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED= 41,625 SF(Not Including City Parkways)Schematic Open Space PlanDavid Cohen40'Scale: 1" = 20'020'10'ROW / P.L.ROW / P.L. Source: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 20209'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"39'-6"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"38'-6"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"FRONT ELEV. PLAN 1AFRONT ELEV. PLAN 1BFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 1AFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 1BFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 1DFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 1C(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Front Elevations_Plan1.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Front Elevations_Plan1_20200122.aiCohen Property Plan 1 Front Elevations Exhibit 3-3a Source: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Front Elevations_Plan2.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Front Elevations_Plan2_20200122.ai9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"40'-9"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"42'-7"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-2"43'-3"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±24'-11"40'-9"FRONT ELEV. PLAN 2AFRONT ELEV. PLAN 2BFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 2AFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 2BFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 2DFRONT ELEVATIONS PLAN 2CCohen Property Plan 2 Front Elevations Exhibit 3-3b Source: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Front Elevations_Plan3.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Front Elevations_Plan3_20200122.ai9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-4"59'-6"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±25'-6"61'-3"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"59'-6"FRONT ELEV. PLAN 3BFRONT ELEV. PLAN 3C FRONT ELEV. PLAN 3DCohen Property Plan 3 Front Elevations Exhibit 3-3c Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-3 Project Description entry along Grove Avenue, and interior of Project site to buffer residences from interior roadways, would be landscaped with drought tolerant trees and plants, similar to Phase I frontage landscaping to ensure a consistent landscape design. Landscaping and walkways would be provided between units and along both sides of the main drive aisle. Refer to Table 3-3 for a summary of open space for the proposed Project. TABLE 3-3 PROPOSED OPEN SPACE (PHASE II) Open Space Location Size (sf) Improvements HOA Common Open Space (Landscape Area) Project street frontages and entry along Grove Avenue and interior of Project site to buffer residences from interior roadways 17,972 -- HOA Common Open Space Center of the site 1,563 Landscaping and resident amenities including shade structure, picnic tables, and barbeque Private Open Space Front, side, and rear yards of each unit 22,090 (approximately 690 sf per unit) Homeowner installed and maintained Total Open Space Provided 41,625 Notes: sf – square feet Source: KTGY 2020. The Orange Municipal Code Section 17.14.070 (R-3 zone) requires 250 sf of useable open space per dwelling unit or a total of 8,000 sf for the proposed Project. The Specific Plan does not carry forward the R-3 zone requirements for minimum open space dimensions, common open space, or amenities. As indicated above in Table 3-3, the Project would provide 19,535 sf of HOA common open space and 22, 090 sf of allowable private open space for a total of 41,625 sf of usable open space, which would exceed the City requirement by 33,625 sf. 3.2.2 Project Access/Parking An entrance driveway is proposed with direct access from East Grove Avenue, along the southern boundary of the Project site. The driveway would connect to internal drive aisles (25 feet wide) that would create five “T” cul-de-sacs and one “L” cul-de-sac on the site, to provide vehicle and pedestrian access to the main entryways and garages of the dwelling units. Enclosed two-car garages would be provided for each unit in addition to 28 guest parking spaces, with 11 parallel spaces at various locations along the internal drive aisles and 17 spaces in motor courts. Phase II provides 28 guest parking spaces, with 11 parallel spaces located along interior drive aisles and 17 in motor courts, providing for a guest parking ratio of 0.88 parking spaces per unit. Phase II provides 64 garaged spaces for the 32 residences withing Phase II, for a total of 92 spaces and parking ratio of 2.88 per unit. The Orange Municipal Code Section 17.34.060.A (R-3 zone) requires 2.6 resident parking spaces per dwelling unit and 0.2 guest space per unit. Accordingly, the proposed Project is required to provide Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-4 Project Description 99 parking spaces. However, based on the existing established Orange-Olive Specific Plan, the Project is required to provide 2.88 spaces per unit which would total 92 spaces. The Project meets this requirement by providing for 28 guest parking spaces at a guest parking ratio of 0.88 spaces per unit and 64 spaces per unit and provides for 2.88 spaces per unit (minimum 2.0 garage spaces per unit). Therefore, the Project would provide for an overall parking ratio of 2.88 spaces per unit, meeting the required parking ratio set by the existing established Orange-Olive Specific Plan. 3.2.3 Architectural Design The proposed dwelling units would include two stories and would generally feature L-shaped footprints, with 9-foot floor-to-ceiling heights. The residential units are proposed at a maximum height of 27 feet 6 inches. Each unit would feature variations in buildings and roof planes and combinations of hip and gable and tile roofs. Each unit would also have a covered main entry, articulated windows, false upper balconies, and chimneys. Proposed building materials include concrete, stone, metal, stucco, wood, glass and/or other similar composites and would be high quality, durable and resistant to damage, defacing, and weathering. Exhibits 3-4a and 3-4b depict the Conceptual Building Elevations and Exhibit 3-5 depicts the Site Perspective. Lighting The Project would include various lights to provide illumination throughout the site. Exhibit 3-6 depicts the Lighting Plan which shows conceptual locations and lighting specifications for the proposed Project Proposed lighting would be shielded to prevent and minimize light spillover onto neighboring properties. Walls and Fencing The Project would include a 6-foot perimeter stucco wall with flat stucco cap along the North Orange- Olive Road frontage, and variable height (3 feet to 6 feet) stucco walls are proposed along East Grove Avenue frontage. The 17.9-foot front yard setback, established in the Specific Plan, fronts Orange Olive Road. Residential structures are not allowed in the front setback area; however, the Specific Plan allows for private rear yards and residential fences that are 6 feet tall to fall within the front setback area. The existing 6-foot block walls along the northern and eastern boundaries between the proposed Project site and the Irving House development (Phase I) to the north and existing residential to the east would remain in place. Privacy fences would separate the units from one another and control access to the rear and side yards of each unit. The privacy fences would consist of 5 to 6 feet high tan- colored vinyl fencing. As indicated above, the exterior 6-foot perimeter wall along North Orange Olive Road frontage and the variable height (3 feet to 6 feet) wall along East Grove Avenue frontage would have a stucco finish with either flat stucco cap (6-foot walls) or precast concrete cap (variable height walls). The low-lying walls are limited to the frontage on Grove Avenue and would be consistent with the pedestrian character of Grove Avenue. Exhibit 3-7, Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan depicts the location of the existing and proposed walls and fences and provides conceptual images of proposed walls and fences. Source: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Bldg_Elevations.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Bldg_Elevations_1_20200122.aiCohen Property Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 3-4aSTREET SCENE FROM INTERNAL STREET Source: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Bldg_Elevations.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Bldg_Elevations_2_20200122.aiCohen Property Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 3-4bENLARGED NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRYSTREET SCENE AT E. GROVE AVE. Source: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Bldg_Elevations.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Bldg_Elevations_3_20200122.aiCohen Property Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 3-4cSTREET SCENE AT ORANGE OLIVE STREET Source: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Site_Perspective.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Site_Perspective_20200122.aiCohen Property Site Perspective Exhibit 3-5 Source: Studio PAD Landscape Architecture, May 2020(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Conceptual_LightingPlan.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Conceptual_LighitngPlan_20200603.ai(1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(4)(5)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(24)(21)(22)(23)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)98765214311131415162112191820222810172425262723TE. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkSYMBOLMANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTIONQTYTree / sign uplight, staked - Kichler model #16019 AZT27 5Cast aluminum, Textured Architectural Bronze, StakedLamp: LED, 6.5, 2700K Warm WhiteIn-ground Flush Mounted - Kichler model #15266AZ with Rock Guard 15688 and Lamp: 8PAR 36 18182Brass, Bronzed Brass, In-Ground / Flush, Bronze Color.Lamp: LED, 13.2, 2700K Warm WhiteLIGHTING SCHEDULEWall Sconce - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 97Bollards - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 30Pole Light - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 16Shade Structure down light - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 4*Final locations and quantities of 120v fixtures per electrical photometric plans. 40'020'10'NOTES:1. Landscape lighting (landscape up-lights) have been coordinated with ElectricalEngineer - see Photometric Plans by South West Group for all final, site lightinginformation, quantities and specifications.2. All site lighting to be shielded to prevent / minimize light wash onto neighboringproperties.ROW / P.L.ROW / P.L.Cohen Property Conceptual Lighting PlanExhibit 3-6 Source: Studio Pad Landscape Architecture, July 2020(07/22/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_ConceptualWallFence.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_ConceptualWallFence_20200122.aiCohen Property Conceptual Wall and Fence PlanExhibit 3-7(1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(4)(5)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(24)(21)(22)(23)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)98765214311131415162112191820222810172425262723TE. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of WorkWALL LEGENDExisting Perimeter Walls & Pilaster(s) to Remain, if possible.6'-0" High Perimeter Stucco Wall with Flat Stucco Cap.(Color to complement Architecture)3'-6" High Stucco Patio Wall with Precast Concrete Cap.5'-6" High Vinyl Fence (Tan Color).5'-0" High Perimeter T.S. Metal Fence (Black Color).6'-3" High Stucco Pilaster Flat Stucco Cap.(Color to complement Architecture)±5'-6" High Vinyl Private Yard Gate (Tan / White Color)3'-6" High Metal Patio Gate.±6'-0" High potential monument wall with project name / lettering attached towall, (stucco to complement Architecture with precast cap) - per future submittal.140'020'10'234567256437* Conceptual image onlyExisting East PL wall to be enhanced as needed to a Min. Height of 6'-0"88Existing North PL Wall to remain and protect in place.Existing Wall, Steps Down towards R/WExisting Wall, Steps Down towards R/WROW / P.L.ROW / P.L.POTENTIALMONUMENT WALLS Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-5 Project Description 3.2.4 Conceptual Landscape Plan The main Project site entry would use an enhanced pavement treatment such as, but not limited to, concrete pavers to provide a more visually appealing entrance. Landscaping along Orange-Olive Road includes a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape buffer, with vine-covered perimeter walls and the addition of large canopy trees. Landscaping along the Grove Avenue frontage includes a landscape buffer, along with six residential entry accesses conducive to a pedestrian street scene. Landscaping will be installed along the internal streets and the frontages of the new homes. The proposed Project would preserve the eight parkway trees on East Grove Avenue and proposes on-site landscaping with trees, shrubs and groundcover along the front yards of each unit. Development of the proposed Project would remove one of the existing nine mature jacaranda trees on East Grove Avenue to allow for new Project entry. In addition to the eight preserved mature jacaranda trees, a total of 115 trees would be planted around the perimeter of the site, along the entry, and throughout the interior of the site. These trees include four date palms, one fruitless olive tree, eight Columbia trees, 17 African sumac trees, 15 bronze loquat trees, 31 Brisbane box trees, and 39 Italian cypress/boetica myrtle trees. Additionally, the proposed Project includes several species of vines and espaliers, including bougainvillea and cat’s claw vine as well as shrubs and ground cover, including aeonium, blue glow agave, aloe, coyote brush, Mexican grass tree, flax lily, echeveria, juncus, La Jolla bougainvillea, Berkeley sedge, western redbud, ‘new gold’ lantana, wax leaf privet, purple needlegrass, coast rosemary, bright star yucca, yellow bells, ‘blue chalk sticks’, red Texas sage, ‘Huntington carpet’, and deer grass. Refer to Exhibit 3-2a, Conceptual Planting Plan for species names, location, size, and quantity proposed and Exhibit 3-2b, Conceptual Landscape Plan, for the overall schematic landscape plan. 3.2.5 Project Construction The Project construction schedule has not been determined at this time and any project-level specific construction phasing would occur as appropriate levels of infrastructure and required improvements are provided. However, a discussion of demolition, grading/construction and off-site improvements required of the Project are provided below. Demolition Implementation of the proposed Project would include demolition of the existing buildings and site improvements. A portion of the demolition and construction debris (65 percent) would be recycled, reused, and/or salvaged in compliance with Chapter 15.17 of the Orange Municipal Code, which adopts the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code) by reference. Materials that cannot be recycled, reused, or salvaged would be transported to a local landfill. Any hazardous materials (e.g., asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint) encountered during demolition would be handled and disposed in accordance with SCAQMD rules and other pertinent regulations. Grading/Construction The proposed grading of the site would retain the relatively flat topography. Total earthwork proposed is approximately 500 cubic yards of export. The Conceptual Grading Plan is depicted on Exhibit 3-8. Project construction is anticipated to occur in a single phase. Construction activities would utilize standard construction equipment, including earth-moving equipment, trucks, cranes, and forklifts. Construction activities and construction staging would mainly occur within the Project site boundaries. Implementation of traffic control measures during demolition and construction activities would minimize obstruction of vehicle traffic on public roadways in the site vicinity. Source: DRC Engineering Inc, March 202002040 80Feet(06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_ConceptualGradingPlan.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Grading_20200122.aiCohen Property Conceptual Grading PlanExhibit 3-8 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-6 Project Description Off-Site Improvements Off-site improvements would include modifications to the sidewalks at existing and proposed driveways, parkway improvements, and utility connections (water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunication lines) on North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue. Exhibit 3-9 shows the Conceptual Utility Plan. The existing trees on East Grove Avenue would be maintained with the exception of one tree that would be removed to accommodate the entry to the site. These encroachments would occur in compliance with City regulations, as contained in Chapter 12.64 of the Orange Municipal Code. Any right-of-way dedication and public infrastructure improvements would also be done in accordance with Chapter 12.52 of the Orange Municipal Code. 3.2.6 Discretionary Approvals Zone Change No. 1297-19 (Amendment to the Orange Olive Specific Plan) As discussed above, the Project is permitted under the site’s General Plan land use designation of LMDR. As stated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the LMDR land use designation is consistent with the R-1-5, R-2-6, R-2-7, R-2-8, R-3, MH, PC, A-1 and P zones (Orange 2010a). Thus, the C-1 zoning of the site is not consistent with its General Plan land use designation (LMDR) and requires a Zone Change. Since the recent development, immediately to the north of the site, involved a Zone Change from C-1 to R-3 (SP), the Project is also proposing a Zone Change for the site from C-1 to R-3 (SP). The proposed Zone Change would make the zoning designation of the site consistent with its LMDR General Plan land use designation, as shown in the Land Use Policy Map in the General Plan, and would, in turn, make the Project consistent with the Zoning Code. As proposed, the Project would comply with applicable zoning regulations for the R-3 (SP) zone. Refer to Exhibit 3-10 for the proposed Zone Change. An amendment to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan is requested to allow for adjustment to the Specific Plan boundary to include the proposed Project area (Phase II), located to the south of the existing Orange-Olive Specific Plan area and to update the Specific Plan accordingly to allow for development of the proposed Project or Phase II. Changes associated with the Orange-Olive Specific Plan Amendment are proposed, only as needed, for development of Phase II. The Orange-Olive Specific Plan Amendment would be consistent with the City of Orange General Plan, as required under State law. Major Site Plan Review No. 0969-19 Major Site Plan Review No. 0969-19 is required pursuant to Section 17.10.060, Site Plan Review, of the Orange Municipal Code to allow the construction of a project that is generally not categorically exempt from CEQA. As part of this review process for the Project, the City will review the following:  Compatibility of the Project with surrounding development and neighborhoods  Building and Site Planning Issues  On and Off-Site Circulation and Traffic Safety  City Services  Environmental Protection Source: DRC Engineering Inc, July 202002040 80Feet(07/24/2020 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Utilities.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Utilities_20200724.aiCohen Property Conceptual Utility Plan Exhibit 3-9 Shaffer Park Orange Fire Station No. 3 M-2 R-3 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8 R-1-8C-1 R-2-6 R-3 R-3 R-3Burlington Northern Santa Fe RlwyE Meats Ave N Orange Olive RdN Cleveland StE Buckeyewood Ave E Glendale Dr E Blueridge Ave E Grove Ave N Shaffer StD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_Proposed_Zoning_20190612.mxd² Proposed Zone Change Cohen Property Exhibit 3-10 (Rev: 6-03-2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Proposed_Zone_Change.pdf 200 0 200100Feet Specific Plan Area Phase I Area Phase II Area (Project Site) Zoning Designation C-1 - Limited Business M-1 - Light Manufacturing R-1-8 - Single Family Residential 8000 sq ft R-2-6 - Residential Duplex 6000 sq ft R-3 - Residential Multiple Family Data Source: City of Orange Public Works GIS Section, 3/16/2016Aerial Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe 2017 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-7 Project Description Design Review No. 4969-19 In accordance with Section 17.10.070, Design Review, of the Orange Municipal Code, the Project would be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee, as it requires Planning Commission or City Council approval and is subject to a Major Site Plan Review. Design review would ensure that the Project has an internally consistent, integrated design theme in terms of architectural features, landscaping, signage, and secondary functional and accessory features. Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1865-19 In compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, the City would adopt Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 1865-19, prior to approval of the proposed Project. The Subsequent MND serves as a finding that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment, with the incorporation of mitigation measures. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 3-8 Project Description This page intentionally left blank Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-1 Environmental Analysis ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a ‘Potentially Significant Impact’ as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture & Forest Resources Air Quality X Biological Resources X Cultural Resources Energy X Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources X Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Wildfire X Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: 1. I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 2. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X 3. I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 4. I find that the proposed project may have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated impact” on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 5. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Name, Title Date Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-2 Environmental Analysis EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each statement. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact”. The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analyses may be cross-referenced, as discussed below). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-3 Environmental Analysis AESTHETICS Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The discussion in the MND for the Phase I Project determined that the site was not located within or near a scenic vista and would not have a significant impact on a scenic vista. The Project site was paved; used for storage of recreational vehicles, boats, and cars; and surrounded by developed urban uses. The analysis indicated that the nearest designated State scenic highway was two miles away and out of view from the Project site. Thus, it was concluded that Phase I Project development would not adversely impact scenic resources, including scenic resources in a State scenic highway, and impacts would be less than significant. The Phase I Project would meet the development standards and guidelines of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan, which set forth development standards for the Project site similar to those specified under the Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone. The Phase I Project would be visually compatible with surrounding land uses. Thus, it was determined that, while the Phase I Project would change the visual character of the Project site, the change would be favorable and not adverse and would be a less than significant impact. The potential light and glare impacts were also analyzed, and it was indicated that Phase I Project development would add nighttime lighting to the Project site such as internal streetlights and exterior building security lights. Such proposed lighting would be directed away from adjacent properties in accordance with the City of Orange Municipal Code. It was determined that Phase I Project development would not create a new source of substantial light or glare adversely affecting day or nighttime views in the area, and that such impacts would be less than significant. Supplemental Analysis Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? The Project site is developed with commercial/retail buildings and does not offer a scenic view nor is it part of a scenic vista. The Natural Resources Element of the General Plan calls for the preservation of ridgelines and steep hillsides in the City. The site is relatively flat and is not located on a ridgeline or steep hillside area. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-4 Environmental Analysis The scenic resources in the City are generally located in the undeveloped Santiago Hills and the eastern portion of the City. Designated viewscape corridors in the City include SR-91 east of SR-55, Chapman Avenue/Santiago Canyon Road east of Newport Boulevard, and Newport Boulevard south of Chapman Avenue, as shown in the Natural Resources Element of the General Plan (Orange 2010a) and in the General Plan EIR (Orange 2010b). The nearest viewscape corridor is SR-91, approximately 2.0 miles northeast of the site. The Project site is not visible from this viewscape corridor due to distance and intervening structures and trees. Therefore, the proposed Project would not have any significant impacts on views from viewscape corridors. There would be no impact on a scenic vista, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? State Route 91 east of SR-55 to Weir Canyon Road is an officially designated State Scenic Highway, and SR-91 east of Weir Canyon Road to the County Line is an eligible State Scenic Highway (Caltrans 2011). This segment of SR-91 is approximately 2.0 miles northeast of the site at its nearest point. The Project site is not part of the views along SR-91 and is not visible from SR-91 due to distance and intervening structures and trees. The Project would have no impacts on public views from the eligible State Scenic Highway segment of SR-91. Additionally, the Project site is currently developed with commercial/retail buildings, a surface parking lot, and associated improvements and does not contain any scenic resources, including rock outcroppings or historic buildings listed or eligible for the NRHP or CRHR. Scenic resources within the City include Santiago Creek, Santa Ana River, and Santiago Oaks Regional Park. Also, given the distance from the eligible State Scenic Highway segment of SR-91, no views of the site would be visible such that would result in an impact. Therefore, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to scenic resources within a State Scenic Highway, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? The proposed Project site is located within an urbanized portion of the City that is developed with commercial, industrial, and residential land uses. As such, the Project would not substantially degrade the visual character of public views of the site and surrounding area within a non-urbanized area. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-5 Environmental Analysis The aerial photograph (Exhibit 2-1) previously presented, shows the Project site’s relationship to the surrounding land uses. East Grove Avenue separates the site from Shaffer Park, and North Orange Olive Road separates the site from the BNSF railroad tracks. Due to the developed nature and flat topography of the Project area, the presence of mature trees and existing walls, views of the Project site are limited to immediately adjacent vantage points, as further described below. However, given the views to be analyzed are from public vantage points, only views from Shaffer Park across East Grove Avenue experienced by users of the park would be considered. Existing Views and Visual Character The Project site is currently developed with two single-story commercial/retail buildings, drive aisles, and surface parking. Exhibits 4-1a through 4-1f, Views of the Project Site, include photographs that depict the existing visual character of the Project site. More specifically, Views 1 through 11 on Exhibit 4-1a through Exhibit 4-1f are views of the on-site buildings and site improvements.  View 1, looking east from the entrance driveway on North Orange Olive Road, shows an angled view of the front of the larger commercial/retail building and the adjacent drive aisle and parking area. The view depicts mature trees and parking lot lights.  View 2, looking north from East Grove Avenue, shows the larger commercial/retail building, as visible from East Grove Avenue through the entry to the commercial center. This building has a cream and beige stucco façade with a false parapet roof and covered building entries. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units are partially visible at the top of the building. Surface parking lot with parked cars and some landscaping and trees are also depicted in this view.  View 3, looking west from the southern section of the site, shows the eastern facade of the smaller commercial/retail building, with stucco walls, false parapet, and glass windows. A trash enclosure and parking spaces are in the foreground. Some onsite trees are visible in this view.  View 4, looking west from the onsite surface parking, shows the view of the front of the northwest portion of the larger commercial/retail building and entrance from North Orange Olive Road.  View 5, looking west from eastern most portion of the site, shows an angled view of the front of the larger commercial/retail building and the adjacent drive aisle and surface parking, featuring mature trees and parking lot lights.  View 6, looking northeast from the intersection of East Grove Avenue and North Orange Olive Road, shows the smaller commercial/retail building at the southwestern corner of the site, as visible from East Grove Avenue. The building is characterized by a cream stucco façade with beige accents, a false parapet roof, and dark glass entry doors.  View 7, looking west from the southeastern corner of the site, shows the southern surface parking area on the site and the sidewalk and jacaranda trees along East Grove Avenue. Views of the on-site buildings are partially blocked by existing on-site trees and parked cars.  View 8, looking north from southeastern corner of the site from East Grove Avenue entrance, shows the eastern drive aisle, with a 6-foot block wall separating the site from the adjacent residences. Trees and landscaping along the drive isle are visible in this view.  View 9, looking northeast from the northwester portion of the site along North Orange Olive Road, shows the northern drive aisle lined with overhead power lines on wooden poles and the rear facade of the larger commercial/retail building, with a 6-foot block wall separating Views of the Project Site (Phase II Area)Exhibit 4-1a Cohen Property View 2 - Looking north at the western section of the larger retail building from Grove Avenue. (06/05/2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Views.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Views_A_20190121.aiView 1 - Looking east at center drive aisles in from the North Orange Olive Road access driveway. Views of the Project Site (Phase II Area)Exhibit 4-1b Cohen Property View 4 - Looking west at the northwest portion of the larger retail building. View 3 - Looking west at the smaller retail building from the southern section of the site. (06/05/2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Views.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Views_B_20190121.ai Views of the Project Site (Phase II Area)Exhibit 4-1c Cohen Property View 6 - Looking northeast at the site from the intersection of Grove Avenue and Orange Olive Road. (06/05/2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Views.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Views_C_20190121.aiView 5 - Looking west at center drive aisles in from south of the larger retail building. Views of the Project Site (Phase II Area)Exhibit 4-1d Cohen Property View 8 - Looking north at drive aisle along eastern edge of the site from Grove Avenue entrance. (06/05/2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Views.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Views_D_20190121.aiView 7 - Looking west at the parking area at the southern section of the site (along Grove Avenue). Views of the Project Site (Phase II Area)Exhibit 4-1e Cohen Property View 10 - Looking east at the northern drive aisle and the back of the larger retail building. (06/05/2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Views.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Views_E_20190121.aiView 9 - Looking northeast at the northwestern corner of the site and adjacent 2-story residential units north of the site. Views of the Project Site (Phase II Area)Exhibit 4-1f Cohen Property (06/05/2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Views.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Views_F_20190121.aiView 11 - Looking east at Grove Avenue from the intersection of Orange Olive Road and Grove Avenue. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-6 Environmental Analysis the site from adjacent two-story residences. The wrought iron gate and fencing blocking entry to the rear of the site are visible in this view.  View 10, looking east from the northwestern corner of the site, shows the recently constructed single-family homes to the north of the site (visible on the left side of the photograph), with the wooden utility poles with transformers and power lines in the foreground. The view depicts the rear of the existing onsite structure.  View 11, looking east from the intersection of North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue, shows East Grove Avenue, lined with street trees along the site (on the left side of the photograph) and green construction fencing along Shaffer Park to the south of the site (on the right side of the photograph). Visual Changes During demolition and construction activities at the Project site, views of construction equipment; ongoing demolition and construction activities; short-term stockpiles of building materials and debris; and haul trucks delivering building materials and removing debris would be visible from surrounding area. These views would be typical of construction sites in an urban environment and temporary nature. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Once construction is completed, the proposed Project would alter views of the Project site by replacing the existing shopping center with surface parking and associated improvements, with 32 detached dwelling units, each 2 stories high, with internal drive aisles and landscaped areas. The units facing East Grove Avenue would have entrances that face East Grove Avenue, while all other proposed units would have side entrances or face the drive aisles internal to the site. The unit orientation to Grove Avenue will serve to create a neighborhood frontage interfacing the park. The individual units would be clustered around six cul-de-sacs internal to the site. First floor garages would be provided at the front of each unit with the exception of the six units that face East Grove Avenue, with main entries at the front or side facades. The visual characteristics of the units are presented in Exhibits 3-4a through 3-4c. Private open space areas would be provided at the front, side and rear of each unit, with side and rear yards fenced in. Common open space would be provided at a single location, at the center of the Project site, which would be landscaped and visually appealing. Section 6.4, Landscape Architecture Guidelines of the Amendment to the Orange-Olive Specific Plan, provides guidelines that are intended to contribute to the enhancement of community character, create a landscaped environment that enhances the pedestrian experience along the street frontages, and provide a plant palette that is sensitive to the surrounding environment and complements the architecture. Given the quality of the design and architecture, the Project would be an improvement over the existing condition of the site. The visual effect of the proposed six-foot high perimeter wall along Orange Olive Road would be softened with the use of vines (Cat’s claw vine). In addition, espaliers (Bougainvillea) would be planted at the three walkways along East Grove Avenue. In light of this, view of the site from a public vantage point (Shaffer Park across East Grove Avenue) would be of a high-quality development with landscaping, common, and private open space area visible from Shaffer Park and adjacent roadways. The Natural Resources Element of the General Plan calls for boulevard landscaping and the preservation of street trees. The Project would preserve existing mature jacaranda street trees along East Grove Avenue (with the exception of one mature jacaranda tree that would be removed to accommodate the entry to the site) and would plant new street trees on North Orange Olive Road in accordance with the City’s Street Tree Master Plan and Street Tree Ordinance. On-site trees would be Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-7 Environmental Analysis removed, replaced and/or maintained in accordance with the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 12.32, Tree Preservation, of the City’s Municipal Code). The landscape plan would also comply with Chapter 16.50, Landscaping Requirements, of the Orange Municipal Code, as reviewed and approved by the City’s Community Services Division, in coordination with the Planning Division. Compliance with these regulations is required under RR BIO-1 in Section 4.4, Biological Resources. In addition, all on-site utility infrastructure would be designed in accordance with the City’s requirements. The Project would also comply with the sign regulations in the City’s Zoning Code, as needed. Additionally, to ensure the Project meets the City regulations, the Project would be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee, in accordance with Section 17.10.070, Design Review, of the Orange Municipal Code (see Regulatory Requirement [RR] AES-1). This review would ensure that the Project has an internally consistent, integrated design theme in terms of architectural features, landscaping, signage, and secondary functional and accessory features. Compliance with RR AES-1 would prevent degradation of the visual quality of the site. While the proposed Project would alter the existing visual character of the Project site from a commercial land use to a residential development and would change views from surrounding public vantage point (i.e., Shaffer Park), this change would not be considered a substantial degradation of the Project site or its surroundings. The new development would replace older structures and increase visual interest and character of the site with quality design and landscaping. The introduction of 32 residences and associated site improvements would also be compatible with Phase I of the Orange-Specific Plan, and the existing residential uses east of the proposed Project. In the absence of scenic resources in the vicinity of the site, the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality and resources. With Project compliance of City regulations through RR AES-1 and RR BIO-1, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR AES-1 below and RR BIO-1 in Section 4.4, Biological Resources. RR AES-1 As part of the entitlement and review by the Design Review Committee, the Project Applicant/Developer shall submit proposed site development and building plans for the review and approval by the City. The City shall review these plans for compliance with applicable requirements of Section 17.10.070, Design Review, of the Orange Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The Project site is located in an area that is already subject to ambient lighting from the existing shopping center, parking lot, and surrounding uses including the newly renovated Schaffer Park located across East Grove Avenue. Streetlights are also present on North Orange Olive Road. The on- site light sources include exterior building lights, parking lot pole lights, and interior building lights visible through glass windows. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-8 Environmental Analysis With the demolition of the shopping center and removal of existing on-site light sources, new light sources would be provided with the proposed dwelling units, along the internal drive aisles, and in the common open space area as depicted in Exhibit 3-6, Conceptual Lighting Plan. This would change lighting levels at the Project site but would be consistent with the ambient and night-time lighting at the residential uses surrounding the site. All on-site light fixtures would be directed, controlled, screened or shaded to avoid spill-over onto surrounding land uses, in accordance with Section 17.12.030, Lighting, of the Orange Municipal Code (see RR AES-2). Additionally, the existing perimeter block walls located on the northern and eastern Project boundaries would provide screening of on-site lighting onto adjacent residential uses. The headlights of vehicles coming to and from the site would be directed south of the proposed driveway on East Grove Avenue and into the parking lot of Shaffer Park, and not into adjacent residences. Due to the urban nature of the Project site and surrounding areas and existing lighting at and near the Project site, impacts associated with new lighting from the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Glare is a common daytime phenomenon and is due mainly to the occurrence of a high number of days per year with direct sunlight and the presence of large reflective surfaces. Excessive glare not only restricts visibility but also increases the ambient heat reflectivity in a given area. Glare is caused by light reflections from pavement, vehicles, and building materials such as reflective glass and polished surfaces. During daylight hours, the amount of glare depends on intensity and direction of sunlight. Glare can create hazards to motorists and nuisances for pedestrians and other viewers. As shown on the building elevations presented on Exhibits 3-4a through 3-4c, the proposed dwelling units would be constructed with primarily non-reflective materials such as stucco on the exterior facades and concrete or clay tile roofing. The use of glass would be confined to windows and is not such that would generate substantial glare affecting surrounding uses. Additionally, during nighttime, the proposed lighting would not be more intense than the surrounding uses, and no lighting that is considered of high intensity such as high wattage security lighting is proposed that would cause substantial nighttime glare. Furthermore, Chapter 17.12.030 of the Orange Municipal Code requires that lighting in residential properties be designed to prevent glare or direct illumination of any public sidewalk or thoroughfares (see RR AES-2). With Project compliance of City regulations (RR AES-2), less than significant impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR AES-2 Exterior lighting for the Project shall be designed and constructed in compliance with Section 17.12.030, Lighting, of the Orange Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 4-9 Environmental Analysis AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220[g]), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104[g])? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The potential impacts pertaining to Agricultural and Forestry Resources were analyzed in the MND for Phase I Project. As discussed, the Phase I Project site was mapped as Urban and Built-Up Land; was not in agricultural use or zoned for agricultural use; and was not under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the discussion concluded that no farmland impacts would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Additionally, no forest use or zoning for forest use was identified on the site. Therefore, Phase I Project development would not impact forest lands, and no mitigation would be required. Supplemental Analysis Would the Project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Based on review of the Orange County Important Farmland 2016 prepared by the California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), there are no lands designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance on or near the Project site. Rather, the Project site and surrounding areas are designated as Urban and Built-Up Land (FMMP 2018). Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural uses. There would be no impact on designated Farmland, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-10 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? The Project site is zoned C-1 and the Project proposes a Zone Change to R-3 (SP). While the City has an Agriculture (A-1) zone, the site and the surrounding areas are zoned for commercial, industrial, and residential land uses (Orange 2016a). There are no nearby A-1 zones and there are no Williamson Act contracts in the City (WAP 2012). Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract. There would be no impact, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220[g]), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104[g])? The Project site is not zoned as forest land and the proposed Zone Change from C-1 to R-3 (SP) would not lead to the rezoning of forest land or timberland to other uses. There is no designated forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned “Timberland Production” in the City of Orange (Orange 2016a). There would be no impact, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The Project site is not considered a forest land and is not located in or near any forest land. The nearest forest is the Cleveland National Forest, which is approximately 9.0 miles east of the Project site (USFS 2018). Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the loss of forestland or the conversion of forestland to non-forest use. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The Project site is located in an urbanized area that is developed primarily with commercial, industrial, and residential land uses. There are no agricultural or forest land on or near the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the loss or conversion of Farmland to non- Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-11 Environmental Analysis agricultural use or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-12 Environmental Analysis AIR QUALITY Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND As analyzed in the MND for the Phase I, project construction and operation would not generate emissions exceeding South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) significance thresholds. The Phase I Project, which proposed development of 25 residential units onsite, was consistent with the pre-existing Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) General Plan designation. Thus, the MND concluded that the Phase I Project would not conflict with the SCAQMD’s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. The MND analyzed the construction impacts of the Phase I Project and concluded that construction would not generate emissions exceeding SCAQMD regional or localized significance thresholds; and, thus, Phase I Project construction emissions impacts would be less than significant. The MND determined that total Phase I Project operational emissions from area, energy, and mobile sources would not exceed SCAQMD significance thresholds, and that Phase I Project operational emissions impacts would be less than significant. The MND concluded that Phase I Project construction and operation would not expose persons to substantial concentrations of criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants, or carbon monoxide hotspots, and that impacts regarding exposure of persons to substantial pollutant concentrations would be less than significant. The Project would result in less than significant cumulative health impact. Supplemental Evaluation The City of Orange is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), a 6,600-square-mile area bound by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. The SoCAB includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, in addition to the San Gorgonio Pass area of Riverside County. The SoCAB’s terrain and geographical location (i.e., a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills) determine its distinctive semi-arid climate, which is characterized by moderate temperatures, oceanic influence, and precipitation limited to a few storms during the winter (November through April). Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-13 Environmental Analysis Criteria Pollutants, Ambient Air Quality, and Attainment Status The criteria pollutants for which federal standards have been promulgated and that are most relevant to this air quality impact analysis are ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). Respirable particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers or less is referred to as PM10. Fine particulate matter, PM2.5, is a subgroup of PM10 that consists of smaller particles that have an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less. Ozone is a gas that is formed when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)—both byproducts of internal combustion engine exhaust—undergo slow photochemical reactions in the presence of sunlight. Thus, VOCs and NOx are O3 precursors. The State of California has ambient air quality standards for these pollutants and also for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility reducing particles. The SCAQMD has divided the SoCAB into 38 SRAs, with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The Project site is in the area represented by measurements made at the Anaheim-Pampas Lane Monitoring Station located on 1630 West Pampas Lane, approximately 5 miles west of the Project site. The pollutants measured at the Anaheim-Pampas Lane Station include O3, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. The monitored air quality data from 2015 to 2017 shows that the national and State standards were exceeded in all 3 years for O3 (8-hour), and State standards were exceeded in 2015 and 2016 for O3 (one hour) (CARB 2019). Based on monitored air pollutant concentrations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) designate an area’s status in attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), respectively, for selected criteria pollutants. These attainment designations are shown in Table 4-1. These attainment designations are shown in Table 4-1. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-14 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-1 ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN Pollutant State Federal O3 (1 hour) Nonattainment Nonattainment O3 (8 hour) Nonattainment PM10 Nonattainment Attainment/Maintenance PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment/Maintenance NO2 Attainment Attainment/Maintenance SO2 Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment Attainment/Nonattainmenta All others Attainment/Unclassifiedb No standards O3: ozone; PM10: particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter; PM2.5: particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; CO: carbon monoxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; SO2: sulfur dioxide; SoCAB: South Coast Air Basin; CARB: California Air Resources Board. a Los Angeles County is classified nonattainment for lead; the remainder of the SoCAB is in attainment of the State and federal standards. b “Unclassified” designation indicates that the air quality data for the area are incomplete and do not support a designation of attainment or nonattainment. Source: SCAQMD 2016. Toxic Air Contaminants The Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study IV (MATES IV) is a monitoring and evaluation study conducted in the SoCAB and is part of the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative (SCAQMD 2015a) and uses methods and guidelines established by the State Office of Environmental Health and Hazards Assessment (OEHHA) in 2003. The study focuses on the carcinogenic risk from exposure to air toxics and does not estimate mortality or other adverse health effects from particulate exposures. The MATES IV study uses 2012 monitored data to model risk throughout the SoCAB. The modeled carcinogenic risk for the area that includes the Project site is 1,019 per 1 million persons (SCAQMD 2015c). This risk is comparable to the calculated SoCAB population-weighted risk of 897 per 1 million persons for the air basin (SCAQMD 2019). Air Quality Management Plan The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations; establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources; inspects emissions sources; and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. The SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary (area and point), mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs). On March 3, 2017, the SCAQMD adopted the 2016 AQMP, which is a regional and multi-agency effort (SCAQMD, CARB, Southern California Association of Governments [SCAG], and USEPA). The 2016 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS); updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories; and SCAG’s latest growth forecasts (SCAQMD 2016). The main purpose of an AQMP is to bring an area into compliance with the requirements of federal and State air quality standards. For a project to be Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-15 Environmental Analysis consistent with the AQMP, the pollutants emitted from the project should not (1) exceed the SCAQMD CEQA air quality significance thresholds or (2) conflict with or exceed the assumptions in the AQMP. Sensitive Receptors Sensitive receptors include, but are not limited to children, the elderly, persons with preexisting respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise. The Project site is located in a mixed-use neighborhood. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Project site are residences to the north and east of the Project and Shaffer Park, located south of the Project across East Grove Avenue. Existing On-Site Emissions The Project site is currently occupied by a shopping center (Shaffer Park Center). As such, existing operations generate air pollutant emissions from a variety of sources such as the vehicle trips generated by the land use (mobile); natural gas used for heating and hot water; landscape and building maintenance equipment; and consumer products. Existing emissions from the site were estimated using the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2 computer program (CalEEMod 2013). CalEEMod is designed to model construction and operational emissions for land development projects and allows for the input of Project- and County-specific information. The CalEEMod model input was based on the building area and the vehicle trip generation rate provided in the Traffic Memorandum (See Appendix G). Existing criteria pollutant emissions are shown in Table 4-2. TABLE 4-2 EXISTING EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Area sources 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile sources 2 9 22 <1 6 2 Total Existing Operational Emissions 3 9 22 <1 6 2 lbs/day: pounds per day; VOC: volatile organic compound; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; SOx: sulfur oxides; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less Some totals do not add due to rounding. Note: CalEEMod model data sheets are included in Appendix B. Thresholds of Significance The SCAQMD provides significance thresholds for both construction and operation of projects within the SCAQMD jurisdictional boundaries. The SCAQMD recommends that projects be evaluated in terms of the quantitative thresholds established to assess both the regional and localized impacts of Project-related air pollutant emissions. The City of Orange uses the SCAQMD thresholds to determine whether a proposed Project would have a significant impact. These SCAQMD thresholds are identified in Table 4-3. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-16 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-3 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AIR QUALITY SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Mass Daily Thresholds (lbs/day) Pollutant Construction Operation VOC 75 55 NOx 100 55 CO 550 550 PM10 150 150 PM2.5 55 55 SOx 150 150 Lead 3 3 SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District; lbs/day: pounds per day; VOC: volatile organic compound; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less; and, SOx: sulfur oxides. Source: SCAQMD 2015b. Would the Project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Pursuant to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, there are two key indicators of AQMP consistency: 1. Whether the Project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions in the AQMP. 2. Whether the Project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the year of Project buildout. With respect to the first criterion, the following analyses demonstrate that the construction and operation of the proposed Project would not result in significant impacts based on Project emissions being below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance and, therefore, would not increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations nor delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions in the AQMP. The proposed Project is not expected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration standards. Construction Emissions The proposed Project would include demolition of on-site buildings and removal of asphalt paving resulting in the export of approximately 3,004 tons of demolition debris and construction of 32 residential units. Air pollutant emissions would include construction equipment exhaust; fugitive dust from demolition and site grading; exhaust and particulate emissions from trucks hauling demolition debris; soil and materials to and from the Project site and from vehicles driven to and from the Project site by construction workers; and volatile emissions from painting and asphalt paving operations. A project with daily emission rates below the SCAQMD’s established air quality significance thresholds (shown in Table 4-3) would have a less than significant impact on regional air quality. Emissions were Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-17 Environmental Analysis estimated using CalEEMod. The CalEEMod model input was based on the Project’s construction assumptions and are included in Appendix B. Mass Emissions Thresholds – Maximum Daily Regional Emissions Table 4-4 presents the estimated maximum daily emissions during construction of the proposed Project and compares the estimated emissions with the SCAQMD daily mass emission thresholds. As shown in Table 4-4, Project construction mass daily emissions would be less than the SCAQMD thresholds for all criteria air pollutants. Emissions from proposed construction would not violate any air quality standard or substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Impacts would be less than significant; and no mitigation is required. TABLE 4-4 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS (LBS/DAY) Year VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 2019 3 27 16 <1 4 2 2020 40 18 15 <1 1 1 Maximum Emissions 40 27 16 <1 4 2 SCAQMD Thresholds (Table 4-3) 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds SCAQMD Thresholds? No No No No No No lbs/day: pounds per day; VOC: volatile organic compound; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; SOx: sulfur oxides; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. See Appendix B for CalEEMod model outputs. Localized Significance Thresholds/Ambient Air Quality In addition to the mass daily emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, short-term local impacts to nearby sensitive receptors from on-site emissions of NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 are examined based on SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) methodology. To assess local air quality impacts for development projects without complex dispersion modeling, the SCAQMD developed screening (lookup) tables to assist lead agencies in evaluating local impacts. The LST method is recommended for projects of five acres or less. For the purposes of an LST analysis, the SCAQMD considers receptors where it is possible that an individual could remain for 1 hour (for NO2 and CO) and where an individual could be exposed for 24 hours (for PM). The emission limits in the lookup tables are based on the Ambient Air Quality Standards. The closest receptors to the Project site are the residences to the north and east of the site. Table 4-5 shows the maximum daily on-site emissions for construction activities compared with the SCAQMD LSTs with receptors at 25 meters (82 feet); the SCAQMD method prescribes the use of the 25-meter minimum distance for all receptors within 25 meters.1 The highest emissions generated for NOx and CO would occur during the demolition phase, and the highest emissions generated for PM10 and PM2.5 would occur during the grading phase. The thresholds shown are based on a construction disturbance area of 1 acre. As shown in Table 4-5, the local emissions from the proposed Project would be less than the thresholds. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. 1 The LST methodology uses the metric system for receptor distances. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-18 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-5 LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD EMISSIONS Emissions (lbs/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Project maximum daily on-site emissions 22.7 14.9 3.6 2.3 LST: 1-acre site threshold 81 486 4 3 Exceed threshold? No No No No NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: particulate matter with a diameter 2.5 microns or less; lbs/day: pounds per day; LST: localized significance threshold. Note: Data is for SCAQMD Source Receptor Area 17, Central Orange County. Source: SCAQMD 2009 (thresholds). See Appendix B for CalEEMod model outputs. Operational Emissions Operational emissions are comprised of area, energy, and mobile source emissions. The primary area source of VOC emissions associated with the proposed Project would result from the use of consumer products; the major area source of CO emissions would be landscaping equipment. Mobile source emissions are based on estimated Project-related trip generation forecasts, as contained in the Project traffic impact analysis; the proposed Project would generate 302 trips daily. Emissions were calculated with the CalEEMod model. Estimated peak daily operational emissions are shown in Table 4-6, which also includes the existing emissions data to produce a resultant net change in long- term emissions attributable to the proposed Project. As shown in Table 4-6, the operational emissions for the proposed Project would be less than the SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds for all criteria pollutants, and less than existing emissions for all criteria pollutants. Because the Project would result in a net reduction in air pollutant emissions when compared to existing uses, the Project would result in a beneficial impact to air quality during the operations phase. Therefore, the operational impact of the proposed Project on regional emissions would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-19 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-6 PEAK DAILY OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Project Operational Phase Emissions Area sources 1 <1 3 <1 <1 <1 Energy sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile sources 1 3 7 <1 2 1 Total Operational Emissions* 2 3 10 <1 2 1 Existing Emissions (Table 4-2) 3 9 22 <1 6 2 Net Change in Emissions (Project minus Existing) -1 -6 -12 <1 -4 -1 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds (Table 4-3) 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No lbs/day: pounds per day; VOC: volatile organic compounds; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less; SOx: sulfur oxides. * Some totals do not add due to rounding. CalEEMod model data sheets are included in Appendix B. With respect to the second criterion, the proposed Project would change the existing commercial land use of the site to a residential use. As discussed in Section 3.6, Discretionary Approvals, no change in the land use designation for the Project site is necessary. However, a Zone Change is proposed to make the land use designation and zoning consistent. As discussed in Section 4.17, Transportation, the proposed Project would result in a reduction in trip generation compared to the existing shopping center. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the 32 units provided by the proposed Project would be occupied by approximately 98 persons. This minimal increase would not induce substantial population growth in the City and would not exceed SCAG’s projected growth for the City and the region. As the AQMP used the growth assumptions by SCAG and the proposed Project would not exceed growth assumptions by SCAG, it would not conflict with the AQMP. This impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR AQ-1 All demolition and construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, for controlling fugitive dust and avoiding nuisance. Contractor compliance with Rule 403 requirements shall be mandated in the contractor’s specifications. RR AQ-2 All demolition and construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402, Nuisance, which states that a project shall not “discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property”. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-20 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? As identified in Table 4-1, Orange County is a nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. The proposed Project would generate PM10, PM2.5, and O3 precursors (NOx and VOC) during short-term construction and long-term operations. Construction Activities Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would result in less than significant construction-related regional and localized air quality impacts, as quantified above in Tables 4-4 and 4-5, respectively. Short-term cumulative impacts related to air quality could occur if construction of the proposed Project and other projects in the surrounding area were to occur simultaneously. In particular, with respect to local impacts, the consideration of cumulative construction particulate (PM10 and PM2.5) impacts is limited to cases when projects constructed simultaneously are within a few hundred yards of each other because of (1) the combination of the short range (distance) of particulate dispersion (especially when compared to gaseous pollutants) and (2) the SCAQMD’s required dust-control measures, which further limit particulate dispersion from a project site. Shaffer Park, located to the south of the site, across East Grove Avenue, recently underwent extensive renovations to upgrade park facilities and infrastructure. The newly renovated park was re-opened in April 2019. No other projects within the proposed Project vicinity would be under construction concurrent with the proposed Project. Therefore, local construction emissions would not be cumulatively considerable, and the Project’s cumulative impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Operational Activities As shown in Table 4-6, operational emissions would be well below the SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds and all criteria pollutant emissions would be less than existing emissions. Because the Project would result in a net reduction in air pollutant emissions as compared to existing uses, the Project would result in a beneficial impact to air quality during the operations phase. Therefore, the proposed Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a pollutant for which the SoCAB is in nonattainment. Emissions of nonattainment pollutants or their precursors would not be cumulatively considerable and would be less than significant, no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? A significant impact may occur when a project would generate pollutant concentrations to a degree that would significantly affect sensitive receptors, which include populations that are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the population at large. Exposure of sensitive receptors is addressed for the following situations: CO hotspots; criteria pollutants and toxic air contaminants (TACs, specifically diesel particulate matter [diesel PM]) from on-site construction; exposure to off- Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-21 Environmental Analysis site TAC emissions; and asbestos and lead-based paint during demolition. Operational, long-term TACs may be generated by some industrial land uses; commercial land uses (e.g. gas stations and dry cleaners); and diesel trucks on freeways. Residential land uses do not generate substantial quantities of TACs and therefore, TACs produced during the operations phase of the Project are not addressed further in this Subsequent IS/MND. Carbon Monoxide Hotspot A CO hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. As outlined in the Traffic Memorandum, vehicle trips generated by the proposed Project would be less than the trips per day associated with the existing shopping center. Therefore, the proposed Project would not increase congestion or result in a significant impact related to CO hotspots. Criteria Pollutants from On-Site Construction Exposure of persons to construction period NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions is discussed in response to Threshold b) above. There would be no significant impacts, and no additional mitigation is required. Toxic Air Contaminant (Diesel Particulate Matter) Emissions from On-Site Construction Construction activities would result in short-term emissions of diesel PM from the exhaust of off- road, heavy-duty diesel equipment used for site preparation (e.g., demolition, excavation, and grading); paving; building construction; and other miscellaneous activities. CARB has identified diesel PM as a TAC. The dose to which receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk. Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance or substances in the environment and the duration of exposure to the substance. Thus, the risks estimated for a maximally exposed individual (MEI) are higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer time period. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, health risk assessments—which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions—should be based on a 30 to 70-year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with the Project. There would be relatively few pieces of off-road, heavy-duty diesel equipment in operation,2 and the construction period (estimated to be 1 year) would be relatively short when compared to a 30 to 70- year exposure period. Combined with the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM and additional reductions in particulate emissions from newer construction equipment, as required by USEPA and CARB regulations, construction emissions of TACs would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial emissions of TACs. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Exposure to Off-Site Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions The CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective provides guidance concerning land use compatibility with TAC sources (CARB 2005). While not a law or adopted policy, the handbook offers advisory recommendations for siting sensitive receptors near uses associated with TACs (such as freeways and high-traffic roads, commercial distribution centers, rail yards, ports, 2 The equipment assumed for the most intense phase, two months of grading, includes one grader, one bulldozer, and one loader. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-22 Environmental Analysis refineries, dry cleaners, gasoline stations, and industrial facilities) to help keep children and other sensitive populations out of harm’s way. Projects of concern for mobile sources of TACs are typically those located within 500 feet of a freeway, near urban roads with more than 100,000 vehicles per day (ADT), or rural roads with more than 50,000 ADT (CARB 2005). While there are more than 100,000 vehicles per day on SR 55, SR 91 and SR 57 near the site, the Project site is not located within 500 feet of these freeways. Based on the truck volume data on adjacent roadways, it is concluded that a quantitative health risk assessment is not necessary and the TAC impact to the Project site would be less than significant. With respect to proximity to emissions from railroad sources, CARB recommends avoiding siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major service and maintenance rail yard; the Project site is east of the BNSF railroad tracks but is not located within 1,000 feet of a service or maintenance yard. CARB also recommends avoiding siting residences within 300 feet of a large gas station or within 500 feet of dry-cleaning operations with two machines using perchloroethylene. There are no dry cleaners within 500 feet or gas stations within 300 feet of the Project site. The SCAQMD has developed the Facility INformation Detail (FIND), a web tool that allows a search for SCAQMD-regulated facilities that are required to have a permit to operate equipment that releases pollutants into the air. According to FIND, there are permitted emission sources primarily to the west of the Project site (SCAQMD 2019). The permitting process requires that emissions that have the potential to affect human health be evaluated for potential health effects at nearby sensitive receptors. Because there are existing residential uses to the north of the Project site, permits to operate that have the potential to affect human health would have considered residential uses proximate to the Project site and mitigation measures would have been incorporated to ensure that there are no significant issues related to these permitted air pollutant sources. Consequently, the proposed Project would not have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial TACs from stationary or mobile sources. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Exposure to Asbestos and Lead Paint During Demolition Exposure of persons to asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) during demolition is addressed in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this Subsequent IS/MND. As identified, the buildings on site were built in 1964 and the late 1980s to early 1990s. Demolition of these structures are anticipated to contain ACM and LBP and the presence of ACM and LBP would be confirmed prior to demolition activities. These materials would then be handled in accordance with applicable regulations (RR HAZ-2 through RR HAZ-4). The impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-23 Environmental Analysis d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people? According to the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, refineries, landfills, dairies, and composting and fiberglass molding facilities (SCAQMD 1993). The proposed Project does not include any of these uses and the proposed residential development would not produce objectionable odors. The potential odors emitted during demolition and construction activities would be associated with construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings. In compliance with CARB policy, on-site vehicles and engines may not idle for more than 5 consecutive minutes (CARB 2009). This will reduce potential odors from vehicle/equipment exhaust at the site. Also, these odors would be temporary and sporadic in nature, would readily dissipate with distance, and would cease upon completion of Project construction. Odors emitted during long-term occupancy of the dwelling units would be limited to those generated by kitchen activities, use of stationary equipment (such as lawnmowers), and solid waste storage. These odors would be similar to those generated by adjacent residential uses and would not affect a substantial number of people. Also, solid wastes would be stored in compliance with the Orange Municipal Code Chapter 8.28, Garbage, which includes storage requirements and regular waste collection and off-site disposal. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no significant impact associated with objectionable odors. Other sources of emissions such as toxics were previously addressed. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-24 Environmental Analysis BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The Phase I Project MND determined that the Project site was mostly paved and did not contain habitat suitable for sensitive species and that Project development would involve only minor vegetation removal within the Orange-Olive setback. It was concluded that the site did not support any riparian habitat, wetlands, or other sensitive natural community. The Project site was not identified as being in or near a wildlife movement corridor. The MND concluded that the Project site was not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the MND concluded that the Phase I Project would not result in impacts to biological resources, and no mitigation was identified. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-25 Environmental Analysis plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project site is located within an urban area and surrounded by commercial, residential, and industrial uses and a park. The site is developed and largely paved, and existing vegetation on the site includes Mexican fan palm and ficus trees, boxwood, day lilies, and groundcover at scattered locations. Jacaranda trees are present in tree wells along East Grove Avenue. The existing landscaping provide potential habitats for common animal species that are typically found in urban areas, such as small mammals, birds, small reptiles, and insects. However, these do not provide natural habitats for sensitive plant and animal species. Review of the USFWS’ Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species shows there are no designated critical habitat areas on or near the site. The nearest critical habitat is located in the El Modena Open Space, approximately 3.3 miles to the southeast, which supports the coastal California gnatcatcher (USFWS 2018a). Since there are no natural or sensitive biological resources on the Project site, the proposed Project would not impact any candidate, sensitive, or special status species, as identified in the local or regional plans, policies, or regulations by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). There would be no impact on sensitive species, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project site is currently developed, and stormwater sheet flows across the asphalt pavement, ribbon gutters, and catch basins toward abutting streets. The site supports ornamental landscaping at scattered locations but does not contain riparian habitat or sensitive natural vegetation communities identified by CDFW and USFWS. There would be no impact to riparian habitats or sensitive natural vegetation communities, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? The site is largely paved and does not support state or federally protected wetlands, or other areas under the jurisdiction of the CDFW, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Review of the USFWS’ National Wetlands Inventory shows there are no wetlands or riparian areas on the site. The nearest wetland area is the Buckeye Channel, Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-26 Environmental Analysis approximately 750 feet south of the site (USFWS 2018b). There would be no impact to this channel or wetlands, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? The Project site is developed and is surrounded by residential uses on two sides and roadways on two other sides. While Shaffer Park is an open space area south of the site, this park is surrounded by residential and industrial developments and roadways on all sides. Therefore, the Project site and adjacent areas are not part of or adjacent to a wildlife corridor. As indicated in the General Plan EIR, functional wildlife corridors within the City include the Santiago Creek through the center of the City; the northeastern portion of the City and the Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridors; and preserved hillsides and ridgelines in the southeastern portion of the City that link with Peters Canyon Park. Therefore, the Project would not affect the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, as the Project is part of none. Also, there are no native wildlife nursery sites on or near the site. Due to the presence of trees and vegetation on the Project site, there is the potential for birds protected by the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code to nest at the site. The MBTA protects common and special status migratory birds and their nests and eggs. Bird species protected under the provisions of the MBTA are identified by the List of Migratory Birds (50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Section 10.13, as amended). Since the 1970s, the MBTA has been interpreted to prohibit the accidental or “incidental” take of migratory birds. However, in December 2017, the acting Solicitor of the Department of the Interior issued a new memorandum disclaiming the interpretation of the MBTA as prohibiting incidental take of migratory birds (DOI 2017). In response to the federal changes in interpretation of the MBTA, the CDFW and the California Attorney General have issued an advisory affirming California’s protection for migratory birds (CDFW and Attorney General 2018). Multiple sections of California Fish and Game Code provide protection for nesting birds and raptors. Section 3503 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird. Section 3503.5 specifically addresses raptors (i.e., birds of prey in the orders Falconiformes and Strigiformes) and makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy these birds or their nest or eggs. Section 3513 prohibits the take or possession of migratory non-game birds as designated by the MBTA or any part of such bird. If demolition and site clearing activities occur during the nesting season, active bird nests on the site may be disturbed or destroyed by the proposed Project, resulting in a significant impact. Therefore, MM BIO-1 is recommended to avoid impacts to nesting birds and their fledglings. Upon completion of construction and landscaping activities on the site, newly planted trees and landscaping would provide nesting habitat for migratory birds. Therefore, impacts to migratory birds would occur during the construction phase but would be less than significant with implementation of MM BIO-1. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-27 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Mitigation Measures: MM BIO-1 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the Community Development Director or designee shall verify that the following requirements for nesting birds and preconstruction survey are completed by the Project Applicant:  The start of demolition and site-preparation activities shall be scheduled outside of the bird nesting and breeding season (typically February 1 through August 15). If demolition or site-preparation activities start during the nesting season, a qualified Biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey in potential bird nesting areas within 200 feet of any proposed disturbance. The survey shall be conducted no more than three days prior to the start of ground disturbance activities (i.e., grubbing or grading).  If active nests of bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and/or the California Fish and Game Code (which, together, apply to all native nesting bird species) are present in the impact area or within 200 feet of the impact area, a temporary buffer fence shall be erected a minimum of 200 feet around the nest site. This temporary buffer may be greater or lesser depending on the bird species and type of disturbance, as determined by the Biologist.  Clearing and/or construction within temporarily fenced areas shall be postponed or halted until juveniles have fledged from the nest and there is no evidence of a second nesting attempt. The Biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when disturbance activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests will occur. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? The proposed Project would retain the existing mature jacaranda street trees along the southern property line on East Grove Avenue, with the exception of one mature jacaranda tree that would be removed to accommodate the entry to the site. On-site trees and vegetation would be removed and replaced by a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcovers. The landscape plan would comply with Chapter 16.50, Landscaping Requirements, of the Orange Municipal Code, as reviewed and approved by the City’s Community Services Division together with the Planning Division. Chapter 12.28, Street Trees, of the City’s Municipal Code regulates the planting or removal of any tree or shrub, stakes or tree guards in, or upon, any public street or right-of-way. Proposed trees on the parkway along North Orange Olive Road would comply with City requirements, including a permit from the Public Works Director/City Engineer and use of trees in the City’s list of recommended street trees. Chapter 12.32, Tree Preservation, of the City’s Municipal Code regulates the removal of trees, including historical trees, from undeveloped property or public interest property without a permit and requires the planting of replacement trees for those removed. Should the on-site trees be Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-28 Environmental Analysis considered historic requiring a permit for removal, the new trees to be planted are expected to provide adequate replacement in accordance with City requirements. Compliance with these regulations is required under RR BIO-1. Thus, the Project would not conflict with City regulations pertaining to the preservation of trees. Impacts would be less than significant and, no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR BIO-1 The proposed on-site and off-site trees shall be planted, preserved, removed, replaced and/or maintained in accordance with Chapter 12.28, Street Trees, Chapter 12.32, Tree Preservation, and Chapter 16.50, Landscaping Requirements, of the Orange Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The Orange County Central-Coastal Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) covers a 208,000-acre area at the central and coastal portions of Orange County, which includes a portion of the City of Orange. However, the Project site itself is not located within this NCCP/HCP area (CDFW 2018a). The entire Orange County is within the boundaries of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) NCCP/HCP, but no transportation improvements under this NCCP/HCP are proposed on or near the site (CDFW 2018b). The Orange County Southern Subregion HCP covers the southeastern portion of Orange County and does not include land in the vicinity of the Project site (USFWS 2006). The site is not within the habitat reserve area or areas proposed for conservation in these NCCPs/HCPs. The site is fully developed with commercial/retail buildings, associated surface parking, and site improvements. It supports ornamental landscaping and vegetation and does not contain any habitat for any sensitive plant or animal species. Therefore, there is no potential for conflict with an NCCP or HCP. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-29 Environmental Analysis CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND (Impacts to paleontological resources were analyzed in the cultural resources section of the MND in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Checklist in effect at that time). As analyzed in the Phase I Project MND, no historical resources were identified onsite, and Phase I Project development would not impact historical resources. It was determined that, although the Project site was located less than half a mile northwest of the Eichler Fairmeadow Tract (recognized by the City as an area with unique architectural character), Phase I Project development would not impact the historical significance of the Fairmeadow Tract. The MND concluded that the Project site was in areas of historical sensitivity for Early American Development (1860-1875) and Farmstead Development (1870s- 1920); thus ground-disturbing activities could encounter archaeological resources. Phase I Project impacts to archaeological resources were identified as less than significant after implementation of MM-CR-1. The MND determined that it was not anticipated that human remains would be encountered during ground disturbing activities. Potential impacts to human remains were identified as less than significant after compliance with California Health and Safety Code §7050.5, California Public Resources Code §5097.98 and the California Code of Regulations (CCR) §15064.5(e). The MND concluded that Phase I Project ground-disturbing activities could damage paleontological resources that might be buried in site soils, and that impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant with implementation of MM CULT-2. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Psomas conducted an archaeological record search on July 19, 2017, at the South-Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton. An inquiry was made to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to request a review of the Sacred Lands File database. The NAHC completed its Sacred Lands File, and a Sacred Lands record search was on December 19, 2018. The results of the literature review from SCCIC are presented below in Table 4-7. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-30 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-7 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC STUDIES NEAR THE PROJECT SITE Report No. Author (Year) Title Affiliation Location OR-2256 Carol Demcak (1999) Cultural Resources Assessments for Orange County Sanitation Districts Archaeological Resource Management Corp. 0.5 mile OR-3287 Roger Mason (2002) Historic Property Survey Report for Tustin Branch Trail Network, City of Orange, Orange County, California Chambers Group, Inc. 0.5 mile OR-3458 Wayne Bonner (2006) Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Results for T-Mobile Candidate La02881d (Anillo Industries), 2090 North Glassell Avenue, Orange, Orange County, California Michael Brandman Associates 0.5 mile OR-3916 Bai “Tom” Tang (2010) Preliminary Historical/Archaeological Resources Study, Olive Subdivision Positive Train Control (PTC) Project, Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Cities of Anaheim, Orange, and Placentia, Orange County, California CRM Tech 0.5 mile The City’s Historic Building Survey was conducted in 1982 with updates in 1992 and 2005 and was used to support nominations to the NRHP and CRHR. It constitutes a recognized list of historic resources in the City and is reflected in the Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element of the General Plan (Orange 2006). The Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element identifies 11 historical resources and 2 historic districts in the City that are included in the NRHP. The majority of these historic resources are located within the Old Towne Orange Historic District. The City has also designated a local historic district (Old Towne District) that partially overlaps with the Old Towne Orange Historic District. Various other structures and sites in the City are identified as potentially eligible for the NRHP, CRHR and/or the Local Register, and there are three proposed local historic districts and three proposed neighborhood conservation areas (Orange 2010a). At the November 13, 2018 meeting, the City Council approved historic district designations for the three Orange Eichler tracts (Fairhaven, Fairhills, and Fairmeadow) and adopted the Orange Eichler Design Standards. The Eichler Historic Districts went into effect on January 11, 2019 (Orange 2019). The Project site is not situated in a historic district or conservation area. Therefore, no direct impacts to contributing elements to a historic district would occur, and no mitigation is required. In terms of existing structures on the site, the larger building on the site was built in 1964 (over 50 years old), while the smaller building was built in the late 1980s to early 1990s (about 30 years old). The on-site buildings are not listed in the NRHP or the CRHR and are not considered as a historic object, historic site, or significant historic resource by the City; nor is the site located within an existing or proposed historic or a neighborhood conservation area. The architectural style of the two commercial/retail buildings is generally nondescript (e.g., one-story, wood-frame construction with stucco walls and false parapet on flat roofs, cloth/metal awnings, glass doors/windows). Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-31 Environmental Analysis However, a Craftsman style single-family home immediately east of the site (at 2000 N. Shaffer Street) was built in 1914 and is considered by the City as a significant historic resource. Another Craftsman style single-family home northeast of the site (at 2056 N. Shaffer Street) was built in 1909 and is also considered by the City as a significant historic resource (Orange 2018i). The Project would not disturb the single-family home east of the site or the other residence to the northeast. Thus, no direct impacts to historic resources would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? The Project site is located within an urbanized area and has been previously graded and developed. Thus, no archaeological resources are expected to be present on the Project site. No known archaeological sites are located on the Project area or in the immediately surrounding area, as indicated by an archaeological and historic record search through the SCCIC and a Sacred Lands File Search through the NAHC. Although no known resources have been recorded within the Project boundaries, the area surrounding the Project area was occupied by Gabrieliño and Juaneño tribes during the prehistoric period. As such, any earth-moving activities within native sediment may adversely impact unknown buried archaeological resources. This potential impact would be mitigated to a less than significant level with implementation of MM CULT-1. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact After Mitigation Previously Approved Mitigation Measures: MM CULT-1 In the event a previously unrecorded archaeological deposit is encountered during construction, all activity on site shall cease, and the City shall be immediately notified. An Archeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications for Archaeology as defined at 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A (Professional Archaeologist) shall be retained by the developer to flag the area in the field and determine if the archaeological deposits meet the CEQA definition of historical (State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5(a)) and/or unique archaeological resource (Public Resources Code 21083.2(g)). If the find is considered a “resource” the Qualified Professional shall prepare a plan and pursue either protection in place or recovery, salvage, and treatment of the deposits. Recovery, salvage, and treatment protocols shall be developed in accordance with applicable provisions of Public Resource Code Section 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5 and 15126.4. If unique archaeological resources cannot be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state, recovery, salvage, and treatment shall be required at the Applicant’s expense. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation by the Qualified Professional. Resources shall be identified and curated into an established accredited professional repository. The Qualified Professional shall have a repository agreement in hand prior to initiating recovery of the resource. Excavation as a treatment option will be restricted to those parts of the unique archaeological resource that would be damaged or destroyed by the project. In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of human remains, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-32 Environmental Analysis of the site or nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner is contacted. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission will be contacted within 24 hours and the most likely descendent contacted. Any further actions will be determined at that point. The Applicant shall implement all recommendations made by the Archaeologist. On-site activity may continue at the direction of the Qualified Professional and the City. Following recovery, a final report containing site forms, a summary of resource significance, and recovery and treatment documentation shall be submitted immediately to the Community Development Department and SCCIC. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects shall be in a separate confidential addendum and not made available for public disclosure. The final written report shall be submitted to the appropriate regional archaeological Information Center prior to Building Permit Final. (Orange-Olive Residential Development Project No. 1837-14 Previously Approved Measure MM-CR-1) Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? The Project site is fully developed, is largely paved, and has been subject to past disturbance. There are no nearby cemeteries and no human remains are known to be present on the site. Thus, demolition of existing structures and site improvements and construction of the Project is not expected to disturb human remains. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that if human remains are discovered on site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Since compliance with State regulations is required for all development (refer to RR CULT-1), no additional mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on site. Impacts associated with this issue are expected to be less than significant, and mitigation is not required. Compliance with RR CULT-1 would ensure that potential impacts on human remains would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR CULT-1 If human remains are encountered during the conduct of ground-disturbing activities, Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition of the materials pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code. The provisions of Section 15064.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines shall also be followed. The County Coroner shall be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The descendent must complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. These requirements shall be included as notes on the contractor specification and Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-33 Environmental Analysis verified by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of grading permits. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-34 Environmental Analysis ENERGY Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The topic of Energy was added to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G (Environmental Checklist) in December 2018. The Phase I Project MND did not directly address Phase I Project impacts respecting this topic. The Phase I Project MND Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions section determined that Phase I Project development would not conflict with plans or policies for reducing GHG emissions. Among actions encouraged or required by such plans and policies were increasing use of zero-carbon renewable energy and increasing energy efficiency. However, no direct conclusion can be made respecting Phase I Project impacts on wasteful or inefficient energy use or conflicts with plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Section 21100(b)(3) of the California Public Resources Code and Appendix F to the State CEQA Guidelines require a discussion of potential energy impacts of proposed projects. Appendix F states: The goal of conserving energy implies the wise and efficient use of energy. The means of achieving this goal include: (1) Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption, (2) Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas and oil, and (3) Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources. Southern California Edison (SCE) and the Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) are utility companies that currently provide and would continue to provide electrical and natural gas services to the Project site. Compliance with energy efficiency and conservation policies and regulations is discussed in this section. The Natural Resources Element of the General Plan provides for the following policies relative to energy use in the City of Orange (City of Orange 2015a). Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-35 Environmental Analysis Policy 2.7: Coordinate with energy suppliers to ensure adequate energy supplies to meet community needs, and to promote energy conservation and public education programs for that purpose. Policy 2.9: Promote City operations as a model for energy efficiency and green building. Policy 2.17: Educate City residents and businesses on the effects of urban runoff, and water and energy conservation strategies. The State of California has also adopted efficiency design standards within the Title 24 Building Standards and CALGreen requirements. Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR, specifically, Part 6) is California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-residential Buildings. Title 24 was established by the California Energy Commission (CEC) in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to create uniform building codes to reduce California’s energy consumption and to provide energy efficiency standards for residential and non-residential buildings. The 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (24 CCR, Part 11), also known as the CALGreen Code, contains mandatory requirements for new residential and nonresidential buildings throughout California. The development of the CALGreen Code is intended to (1) cause a reduction in GHG emissions from buildings; (2) promote environmentally responsible, cost-effective, healthier places to live and work; (3) reduce energy and water consumption; and (4) respond to the directives by the Governor. In short, the Code is established to reduce construction waste; make buildings more efficient in the use of materials and energy; and reduce environmental impact during and after construction. The regulation of energy efficiency for residential and non-residential structures is established by the CEC and its California Energy Code. Starting on January 1, 2020, all new single- family residential uses will be required to offset their annual electrical demand through the use of energy efficiency and solar photovoltaic panels. These new homes are expected to reduce energy use by more than 50 percent. The proposed Project would be consistent with these objective and policies. Construction Project construction would require the use of construction equipment for grading and building activities. All off-road construction equipment is assumed to use diesel fuel. Construction also includes the vehicles of construction workers and vendors traveling to and from the Project site. Off-road construction equipment use was calculated from the equipment data (mix, hours per day, horsepower, load factor, and days per phase) provided in the CalEEMod construction output files included in Appendix B of this Subsequent IS/MND. The total horsepower hours for the Project was then multiplied by fuel usage estimates per hours of construction activities included in the Off-Road Model. Fuel consumption from construction worker, vendor, and delivery/haul trucks was calculated using the trip rates and distances provided in the CalEEMod construction output files. Total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) was then calculated for each type of construction-related trip and divided by the corresponding miles per gallon factor using CARB’s EMFAC 2014 model. EMFAC provides the total annual VMT and fuel consumed for each vehicle type. Construction vendor and delivery/haul trucks were assumed to be heavy-duty diesel trucks. As shown in Table 4-8, a total 18,975 gallons of diesel fuel and 55 gallons of gasoline is estimated to be consumed during Project construction. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-36 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-8 ENERGY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION Source Gasoline - gallons Diesel Fuel - gallons Off-road Construction Equipment 0 17,957 Worker commute 43 0 Vendors 1 0 On-road haul 11 1,018 Totals 55 18,975 Sources: Psomas 2019 based on data from CalEEMod, OffRoad and EMFAC2014. Fuel energy consumed during construction would be temporary in nature and would not represent a significant demand on energy resources. The Project would also implement best management practices such as requiring equipment to be properly maintained and minimize idling and where feasible, use electric or clean alternative fuel equipment. Furthermore, there are no unusual Project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy- efficient than at comparable construction sites in other parts of the State. Energy used in the construction of the Project would enable the development of buildings that meet the latest energy efficiency standards as detailed in California’s Title 24 building standards. Therefore, the proposed construction activities would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary fuel consumption. Operations The proposed Project would promote building energy efficiency through compliance with energy efficiency standards (Title 24 and CALGreen). The Project site is currently occupied by commercial/retail uses. Energy associated with transportation and onsite usage by these existing commercial uses were quantified and compared to uses that would occur under the proposed Project. The net change in emissions are shown in Table 4-9 below. TABLE 4-9 ENERGY USE DURING OPERATIONS Land Use Gasoline Diesel Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Electricity (kWh/yr) Existing Land Uses 85,060 16,339 509,641 406,853 Project Land Uses 40,507 3,049 825,757 256,593 Net Difference (Project minus Existing) -44,553 -13,290 316,116 -150,260 Sources: Psomas 2019 As shown in Table 4-9 above, energy consumption associated with existing land uses exceed those for the proposed Project for every transportation fuel (gasoline and diesel) as well as for electricity. Only the Project’s natural gas consumption used for heating needs exceeds that of existing conditions. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the latest Title 24 energy efficiency standards. The CEC anticipates the new 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards would result in a reduction of energy use by more than 50 percent as compared to previous energy standards (CEC 2018). Therefore, the new buildings would be more energy efficient than the existing buildings to be Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-37 Environmental Analysis demolished. With respect to energy use associated with transportation, the Project would result in substantially less vehicle trips (1,103 Existing vs. 302 Project trips) and consequently use less fuel. In terms of whether the operations phase would result in a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project operation, the Project would add new units to the housing inventory within Orange County. According to the Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County – Orange County’s Declaration on Housing, “Whereas, Orange County is experiencing a substantial shortage of housing, which is creating a significant negative impact on household budgets and the quality of life of its residents, as well as diminishing our county’s workforce…” (Orange County 2018). Because the Project would address the deficiency in housing stock within Orange County, it would provide additional housing options to the City of Orange and potentially reduce the use of transportation fuels. As such, increasing the housing inventory within Orange County is not considered a wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in an inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? The Project would be required to comply with the State of California’s Title 24 Building Standards. As discussed previously, the latest building standards will incorporate the CEC’s building energy efficiency standards which would reduce energy consumption by over half. Because the Project complies with the latest energy efficiency standards, addresses the housing deficiency within the County and incorporates renewable energy, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. It should be noted that the proposed Project would comply with the applicable building code standards at the time of submittal of building permits. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-38 Environmental Analysis GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ii) Strong seismic groundshaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The Phase I Project MND determined that the potential for surface rupture of a known active fault onsite was very low. The MND concluded that several active faults were present in the Project region; thus, strong ground shaking would be likely in the design lifetime of the proposed buildings, and that hazards from ground shaking would be less than significant after compliance with the adopted California Building Code (CBC) seismic safety requirements. The MND determined that the potential for liquefaction in subsurface site sediments was negligible. The MND concluded that Phase I Project development would not cause significant soil erosion impacts, as the Project would reduce impervious surfaces onsite, thus reducing runoff. Additionally, the Project would comply with City and State regulatory requirements minimizing soil erosion during Project construction and operation. The MND found that site soils within five feet of the ground surface could be collapsible, but also noted that the Phase I Project included a Project Design Feature requiring the removal of the top five feet of soil below the ground surface or the three feet below the bottom of the foundations. Impacts arising from collapsible soils were identified as less than significant. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-39 Environmental Analysis The MND determined that the expansion potential of subsurface site soils was low and that impacts arising from expansive soils would be less than significant. Supplemental Evaluation A Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report (Geotechnical Report) has been prepared by Twining Consulting (January 2019) for the proposed Project to assess the geotechnical conditions on the site and provide structural design recommendations for the construction of the Project. The findings of the Geotechnical Evaluation are summarized below, and the report is included as Appendix C to this Subsequent IS/MND. Would the Project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Ground rupture occurs when movement on a fault breaks through the surface. The State of California has established Earthquake Fault Zones for the purpose of mitigating the hazard of fault rupture by prohibiting the location of most human occupancy structures across the traces of active faults. According to the Orange General Plan Safety Element, no known Alquist-Priolo fault zone is located in the City of Orange. Therefore, there is no impact associated with surface rupture from an Alquist Priolo Fault Zone. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not Applicable, as no mitigation is required ii) Strong seismic groundshaking? The City of Orange and the rest of California are located within a seismically active region. There are no known active or potentially active faults on the Project site; however, portions of the City are traversed by two potentially active local faults: The Peralta Hills fault and the El Modeno Fault (Orange 2010b). Both are located to the northeast of the Project site with the El Modeno Fault at an approximate distance of 0.7 miles and the Peralta Hills fault at an approximate distance of 1.2 miles from the Project site. The nearest known active fault to the Project site is the Whittier Fault, located approximately 6.8 miles northeast of the Project site (USGS and CGS 2006). The Project site is also within an area identified a potential groundshaking zone associated with the San Andreas Fault. Exhibit 4-2, Fault Locations, shows the locations of the nearest faults. Figure PS-2, Potential Groundshaking Zones – 8.3 San Andreas Earthquake, in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan shows the generalized groundshaking zones associated with the San Andreas Fault. It is anticipated that because the Project site is located within a seismically active region, the Project site would experience ground shaking during the life of the Project. Geotechnical design considerations for construction in the City of Orange are governed by the Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the City’s Municipal Code, which incorporates by reference the California Building Code (CBC) (Chapter 15.04). All buildings and other structures constructed as part of the proposed project would be designed in accordance with applicable requirements of the Fault Locations Project Site Los Angeles Orange Sa n B e r n a d i n o SantaAnaRiverC entral A v e n u e fa u lt Pera ltaHills faultElModenofault Elsino r e f a u l t z o n e , W h i t t i e r s e c t i o n ( W h i t t i e r f a u l t ) El s i n o r e f a u l t z o n e , C h i n o s e c t i o n ( C h i n o f a u l t ) Elsino r e f a u l t z o n e , Glen I v y s e c t i o n ( F r e s n o f a u l t ) §¨405 §¨5 ST22 ST90 ST261 ST142 ST39 ST241 ST60 ST1 ST73 ST72 ST55 ST71 ST57 ST241 Anaheim Beach Irvine Whittier Santa Ana Huntington Costa Mesa Buena Park Westminster Yorba Linda D:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_Faults_20190612.mxd3 0 31.5 Miles² Quaternary Faults by Age <150 years <15,000 years <130,000 years <750,000 years <1,600,000 years Cohen Property Exhibit 4-2 (Rev: 11-18-2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Faults.pdf Data Source: California Geological Survey, 2010 Quaternary Fault and Fold Database USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Orange Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-40 Environmental Analysis CBC in effect at the time of grading plan submittal, and any applicable building and seismic codes in effect at the time the grading plans are submitted (RR GEO-1). The Geotechnical Report includes 2016 CBC Seismic Design Parameters in its evaluation (MM GEO-1) and concludes that the proposed Project is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, with incorporation of the Geotechnical Report recommendations into the design and construction of the Project and compliance with applicable building and seismic codes. Regulatory Requirements: RR GEO-1 The Project shall be designed and constructed in compliance with the 2016 California Building Code (CBC) Design Parameters, adopted by reference in Chapter 15.04 of the Orange Municipal Code, or the most current CBC adopted in the City’s Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact After Mitigation Mitigation Measures: MM GEO-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, site preparation and building design specifications shall follow the recommendations in the Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report for the Proposed North Orange Olive Development prepared by Twining Consulting (dated January 7, 2019) and additional future site-specific, design-level geotechnical investigations of the Project. Based on the Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report, recommendations to be included in the Project specifications pertain to General Considerations, Expansive and Collapsible Soils, Corrosive Soils, Earthwork and Site Preparation, Concrete Slabs-On-Grade, Drainage Control, Preliminary Flexible Pavement Design, Rigid Pavement Design, Stormwater Quality Control Measures, Design Review, and Construction Monitoring. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Liquefaction occurs when the pore pressures generated within a soil mass approach the effective overburden pressure. Liquefaction of soils may be caused by cyclic loading such as that imposed by ground shaking during earthquakes. The increase in pore pressure results in a loss of strength, and the soil then can undergo both horizontal and vertical movements, depending on the site conditions. Other phenomena associated with soil liquefaction include sand boils, ground oscillation, and loss of foundation bearing capacity. Liquefaction is generally known to occur in loose, saturated, relatively clean, fine-grained cohesionless soils at depths shallower than approximately 50 feet. Factors to consider in the evaluation of soil liquefaction potential include groundwater conditions, soil type, grain size distribution, relative density, degree of saturation, and both the intensity and duration of ground motion. As indicated in the Geotechnical Report (Appendix C), based on a review of the State of California Official Map of Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation for the Orange Quadrangle, the site is not located within a Zone of Required Investigation for Liquefaction. Additionally, the California Geological Survey (CGS) does not designate the site and the surrounding area as Liquefaction Zones, which include areas where historical occurrence of liquefaction or local geological, geotechnical, and groundwater conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displacement (CGS 1998). Also, according to Figure PS-1, Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-41 Environmental Analysis Map, of the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, the Project site is not located in a Liquefaction Hazard Area (Orange 2010a). Therefore, the Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect, including the risk of loss, injury, or death, due to seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required iv) Landslides? The Project site and surrounding area are located in a generally flat, urbanized portion of the City, with the ground elevations on the Project site at approximately 200 feet above msl (USGS 2018). The CGS does not designate the site and the surrounding area as Earthquake-Induced Landslide Zones, which include areas where historical occurrence of landslide movement has occurred or where local topographic, geological, geotechnical, and subsurface water conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displacement (CGS 1998). As indicated in the Geotechnical Report (Appendix C), no landslides or related features underlie or are adjacent to the Project site. Additionally, according to Figure PS-1, Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Map, of the Public Safety Element of the City of Orange General Plan, the Project site is not located in a Landslide Hazard Area (Orange 2010a). Therefore, the Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect, including the risk of loss, injury, or death, due to landslides. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The Project site is fully developed with a shopping center, surface parking lot, and associated site improvements and has a relatively flat topography. During demolition and construction activities, temporary soil erosion may occur due to soil disturbance and the removal of buildings and paved surfaces. In addition, soil erosion due to rainfall and wind may occur if unprotected soils are exposed during construction. The Phase 1 ESA for the site states that the underlying soils consists of Myford sandy loam, which has slow runoff potential and a moderate erosion hazard (Ceres 2015). As the Project site has over one acre of land area, it would be required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction activities or coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit. The Construction General Permit requires preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and implementation of erosion control, sediment control, tracking, waste management, and construction site maintenance best management practices (BMPs) to reduce the potential for soil and wind erosion during construction activities (see RR HYD- 1 below). Further, the proposed Project must comply with the City’s grading ordinance, which requires preparation of an erosion and sediment control plan for City approval prior to issuance of a grading permit (see RR GEO-2). With compliance with these regulations, construction-related soil erosion would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-42 Environmental Analysis As indicated in the WQMP (Appendix E), the Project site is currently 6 percent pervious and 94 percent impervious. Following construction of the proposed Project, the site would be 17 percent pervious and 83 percent impervious (DRC 2019a). While the proposed Project would increase the amount of pervious surfaces at the Project site, the pervious surface at the common open space area in the center of the site would be landscaped, to prevent potential erosion. There would be minimal areas of exposed soils following completion of the proposed Project where erosion could occur. Site improvements and landscaping would also prevent long-term erosion (RR HYD-2). With increased pervious surfaces on the site, the runoff volume and rate are expected to decrease; resulting in less potential for downstream erosion. Therefore, operation-related soil erosion would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR GEO-2, below, and RR HYD-2 (provided in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality) RR GEO-2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall prepare an erosion and sediment control plan in compliance with City’s Grading Ordinance, as approved by the City. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? As discussed above, the Project site is not located in a potential landslide or a potential liquefaction area. Based on the Geotechnical Report (Appendix C), groundwater was not encountered in the exploratory borings placed on the site during the geotechnical investigation. The historical high depth to groundwater is reportedly at approximately 50 feet at the Project site (Twining 2019). In light of the depth of water and low potential for liquefaction as discussed under item (iii), above, lateral spreading also has a low potential of occurrence. As indicated in the Geotechnical Report, although the soil expansion is classified as very low, the consolidation test results show existing collapsible soil at various depths (Appendix C). In order to control the settlement for hydro-collapsible soils, the report recommends an over-excavation and recompaction of the building pad area to a depth of 6 feet below the adjacent grade or 4 feet below the bottom of foundation, whichever is deeper. This, along with the remaining recommendations, as outlined in the Geotechnical Report (MM GEO-1) and adherence to the City’s grading code (RR GEO-1) would reduce the potential for expansion and collapse. The Geotechnical Report concludes that the proposed Project is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Report are incorporated into the design and construction of the proposed Project, in its entirety, as required by MM GEO-1. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant. Regulatory Requirements: See RR GEO-1 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Mitigation Measures: See MM GEO-1 above Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-43 Environmental Analysis d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Expansive soils are characterized by their ability to undergo significant volume changes (shrink or swell) due to variations in moisture content. Changes in soil moisture content can result from rainfall, landscape irrigation, utility leakage, roof drainage, perched groundwater, drought, or other factors, and may cause unacceptable settlement or heave of structures, concrete slabs supported on-grade, or pavements supported over these materials. Depending on the extent and location below finished subgrade, these soils could have a detrimental effect on the proposed construction. As indicated above, based on the field soil classification, as stated in the Geotechnical Report, while the expansion index classified as “very low” expansion potential, the consolidations test results show existing collapsible soil at various depths. However, with recommendations included in the Geotechnical Report (MM GEO-1), impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, Project construction would be required to comply with Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the City’s Municipal Code, which adopts the CBC by reference (RR GEO-1). Also, the Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report concludes that the proposed Project is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report are incorporated into the design and construction of the proposed project, in its entirety, as required by MM GEO-1. Therefore, Project impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant with compliance with RR GEO-1, and MM GEO-1. Regulatory Requirements: See RR GEO-1 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact After Mitigation Mitigation Measures: See MM GEO-1 above Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? There is no evidence of septic tanks and cesspools on the site (Ceres 2015). The Project would connect to the existing 10-inch sewer line on North Orange Olive Road, which is part of the City’s municipal sewer system for the disposal of wastewater into the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) system. The use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems is not proposed by the Project. Therefore, no impact would result, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not Application, as No Mitigation is Required f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? A paleontological records search was requested of Dr. Sam McLeod at the Natural History Museum (LACM) of Los Angeles County, Vertebrate Paleontology Department; and results were received on December 18, 2018. In addition, an online paleontological records search and literature review were conducted to determine if any fossil localities have been recorded in the Project area or in the general Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-44 Environmental Analysis vicinity. Sources for the records search included the PaleoBiology Database (PaleoBioDB 2018), University of California Museum of Paleontology NEOMAP Database (2018), and the database of Late Pleistocene vertebrate localities for California (Jefferson 1991). The paleontological record search results indicate that no vertebrate fossil localities are directly within the boundaries of the Project segment; however, one fossil-bearing locality is recorded near the Project segment. Results of the records search are detailed in Table 4-10 below. TABLE 4-10 FOSSIL LOCALITIES NEAR THE PROJECT SITE Locality Number Resource Type Taxa Proximity to Area of Potential Effect Depth LACM 4943 Vertebrate Fossils Equus sp. (horse) Outside (~.75 miles from APE) 8-10 feet below surface The Project site is fully developed and has already been disturbed. However, the possibility exists that unidentified paleontological sites are present within native sediment beneath the site. As indicated above, based on the paleontological records search results (Table 4-10), there is one known resource located 0.75 mile from the Project site. According to the soils and geologic formations within the City, including the Project area, the Project site has a moderate potential to contain significant paleontological resources. Similar to archaeological resources, ground-disturbing activities associated with construction have potential to encounter native soils and previously undiscovered paleontological resources. This impact would be mitigated to a less than significant level by implementation of MM GEO-2. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact After Mitigation Mitigation Measures: MM GEO-2 In the event paleontological resources are encountered during construction, ground-disturbing activity shall cease. It is recommended that a Qualified Paleontologist be retained by the Developer to examine the materials encountered, assess the nature and extent of the find, and recommend a course of action to further investigate and protect or recover and salvage those resources that have been encountered. Criteria for discard of specific fossil specimens shall be made explicit. If a Qualified Paleontologist determines that impacts to a sample containing significant paleontological resources cannot be avoided by project planning, then recovery may be applied. Actions may include recovering a sample of the fossiliferous material prior to construction; monitoring work and halting construction if an important fossil needs to be recovered; and/or cleaning, identifying, and cataloging specimens for curation and research purposes. The cost associated with recovery, salvage, and treatment shall be borne by the Developer. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation by the Qualified Professional. Resources shall be identified and curated into an established accredited professional repository. The Qualified Professional shall have a repository agreement in hand prior to initiating recovery of the resource. (Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND No. 1837-14 Previously Approved Measure MM-CR-2) Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-45 Environmental Analysis GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The Phase I Project MMD concluded that the GHG emissions would be well below the City’s 3,000 MTCO2e per year significance threshold. The MND also determined that the Project would comply with plans, policies, and regulations intended to reduce GHG emissions. Thus, GHG emissions impacts were identified as less than significant and no mitigation was required. Supplemental Evaluation Greenhouse gases (GHG) are global pollutants and are therefore unlike criteria air pollutants such as O3, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), and TACs, which are pollutants of regional and local concern (refer to Section 4.3, Air Quality, of this Subsequent IS/MND). While pollutants with localized air quality effects have relatively short atmospheric lifetimes (generally in the order of a few days), GHGs have relatively long atmospheric lifetimes, ranging from one year to several thousand years. Long atmospheric lifetimes allow for GHGs to disperse around the globe. Therefore, GHG effects are global, as opposed to the local and/or regional air quality effects of criteria air pollutant and TAC emissions. GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). GHGs vary widely in the power of their climatic effects; therefore, climate scientists have established a unit called global warming potential (GWP). The GWP of a gas is a measure of both potency and lifespan in the atmosphere as compared to CO2. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) is a quantity that enables all GHG emissions to be considered as a group despite their varying GWP. The GWP of each GHG is multiplied by the prevalence of that gas to produce CO2e. The Project site is currently occupied by a shopping center, which would be demolished. Existing commercial/retail activities generate GHG emissions from a variety of sources, such as the vehicle trips generated by employees, patrons, and visitors of the shopping center; electricity consumption; disposal of solid wastes; conveyance of water for on-site use; and treatment of wastewater. Existing GHG emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod model (as described in Section 4.3, Air Quality), and are shown in Table 4-11. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-46 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-11 EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Source Emissions (MTCO2e/year) Area <1 Energy 157 Mobile 900 Waste 27 Water 20 Total 1,105 MTCO2e/year: Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year Notes: Totals may not add due to rounding variances. Detailed calculations in Appendix B. Would the Project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? It is accepted as very unlikely that any individual development project would have GHG emissions of a magnitude to directly impact global climate change; therefore, any impact would be considered on a cumulative basis. Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions Based on the proposed construction activities as described in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of this Subsequent IS/MND, the principal source of GHG emissions from the Project would be the internal combustion engines of construction equipment, on-road construction vehicles and trucks, and construction crew vehicles. The estimated construction GHG emissions of the proposed Project would be 306 MTCO2e, as obtained from the CalEEMod model and shown in Table 4-12. TABLE 4-12 ESTIMATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM CONSTRUCTION Year Emissions (MTCO2e) 2019 261 2020 45 Total 306 MTCO2e: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent Notes: Totals may not add due to rounding variances. Detailed calculations in Appendix B. Because GHG impacts from construction activities occur over a relatively short period of time, they contribute a relatively small portion of the overall lifetime Project-generated GHG emissions. In addition, available GHG emission reduction measures for construction equipment are relatively limited. Consequently, SCAQMD staff recommends that construction GHG emissions be amortized over a 30-year project lifetime, so that GHG reduction measures can address construction GHG Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-47 Environmental Analysis emissions as part of the operational GHG reduction strategies (SCAQMD 2008). Therefore, construction GHG emissions are combined with operational GHG emissions by amortizing the construction operations over an assumed 30-year Project lifetime. The operational GHG emissions of the Project would come primarily from vehicle trips; other sources include electricity and water consumption, natural gas for space and water heating, and use of gasoline-powered landscaping and maintenance equipment. Estimated operational GHG emissions from the Project are shown in Table 4-13, along with the amortized construction GHG emissions. To quantify the net Project GHG emissions, the emissions attributed to the proposed Project would be reduced by the existing GHG emissions from existing shopping center operations that would be demolished as part of the Project. Estimated net Project GHG emissions are also shown in Table 4-13. TABLE 4-13 ESTIMATED GROSS AND NET ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM PROJECT OPERATION Source GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/yr) Area 7 Energy 126 Mobile 395 Waste 19 Water 16 Amortized Construction Emissions 10a Total Proposed Project Emissions 573 Total Existing Use Emissions (Table 4-8) 1,105 Net Change in GHG emissions (Project minus Existing) -532 MTCO2e/yr: Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year; GHG: greenhouse gas a Total derived by dividing construction emissions (see Table 4-9) by 30 years. Note: Detailed calculations in Appendix B. There are no adopted quantitative federal, State, regional, or local CEQA significance criteria for GHG emissions for residential or commercial development projects. The SCAQMD has proposed, but not adopted a threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for non-industrial development projects. As shown, the estimated gross GHG emissions from the proposed Project, -532 MTCO2e per year. This net reduction in GHG emissions associated with the Project would be substantially less than the 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold. Because there would be an overall reduction in GHG emissions with implementation of the proposed Project and GHG emissions are less than the SCAQMD significance threshold, GHG impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-48 Environmental Analysis c) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? On June 1, 2005, the California Governor signed Executive Order S-3-05, which calls for a reduction in GHG emissions to year 2000 levels by 2010, to year 1990 levels by 2020, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. The principal overall State plan and policy adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions is Assembly Bill (AB) 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006). AB 32 establishes regulatory, reporting, and market mechanisms to achieve quantifiable reductions in GHG emissions and establishes a cap on statewide GHG emissions. The quantitative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, through its 2008 Scoping Plan. Senate Bill (SB) 375, signed in September 2008, aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG reduction targets, and land use and housing allocations. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy that will address land use allocation in their regional transportation plans. SB 375 is being addressed at the State and regional levels, and the principles of SB 375 have been incorporated in SCAG’s 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. California Executive Order B-30-15 set an “interim” statewide emission target to reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and directed State agencies with jurisdiction over GHG emissions to implement measures pursuant to their statutory authority to achieve this 2030 target and the 2050 target of 80 percent below 1990 levels. The SCAQMD and the City of Orange have not adopted standards for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. However, the City has an Interim Guidance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis. This memorandum provides guidance for the evaluation of GHG emissions in CEQA documents. In terms of evaluating project consistency with applicable City plans and polices related to GHGs, projects should be consistent with the climate change-related policies outlined in Table NR-1 (Climate Change Related Policies) of the City’s General Plan Natural Resources Element, including but not limited to: Land Use Element Policy 6.9: Maximize landscaping along streetscapes and within development projects.  Consistent. The Project would have private open space uses along streetscapes with landscaping within these areas, as described in Section 3.2, Project Components, of this Subsequent IS/MND. The frontage along Orange-Olive Road would be landscaped with drought tolerant trees and plants, similar to Phase I frontage landscaping to ensure a consistent landscape design, and as shown in Exhibit 3-2b, Conceptual Landscape Plan. Urban Design Element Policy 2.4: Building design and orientation to promote active street life.  Consistent. The proposed dwelling units along Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue would face towards the street, with private open space areas at the front of the unit. Urban Design Policy 4.6: Pedestrian linkages between commercial districts and neighborhoods.  Consistent. The Project would provide pedestrian access with sidewalks to adjacent neighborhoods and nearby commercial districts. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-49 Environmental Analysis Economic Development Element Policy 5.4: Redevelop and rehabilitate underutilized and vacant lands and public right-of-way.  Consistent. The proposed Project is a redevelopment project that would locate residences close to schools and parks. Growth Management Element Policy 2.4: Infill development and mixed-use opportunities wherever possible as developable space becomes more limited,  Consistent. The Project would provide infill development with residential uses. Natural Resources Element Policy 2.2: Alternative transportation modes, alternative technologies, and bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods.  Consistent. The Project would have driveways that would connect to internal drive aisles that would create five “T” cul-de-sacs and one “L” cul-de-sac on the site, to provide vehicle and pedestrian access to the main entryways and garages of the dwelling units. The sidewalks would be retained by the Project and would continue to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. Natural Resources Element Policy 2.3: Native and drought-tolerant plants, proper soil preparation, and efficient irrigation systems for landscaping.  Consistent. The Project would be landscaped with drought-tolerant trees and plants, as shown in Exhibit 3-2a, Schematic Planting Plan. Natural Resources Element Policy 2.6: Sustainable building and site designs for new construction and renovation projects.  Consistent. The Project will comply with the latest Title 24 Building energy efficiency standards. Single-family homes built with the 2019 Title 24 building standards will use approximately 53 percent less energy than single-family homes built under the 2016 standards, with incorporation of mandatory rooftop solar electricity generation factored in (CEC 2018). Additionally, the standards encourage demand responsible technologies, such as battery storage and heat pump water heaters to improve the building’s thermal envelope through high-performance attics, walls, and windows. The Title 24 standards would enable the use of highly efficient air filters to capture particulates from outdoor and indoor systems (CEC 2018). Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1114 would limit the use of paints with high volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for architectural coating during construction of the residences. Natural Resources Element Policy 2.15: Minimize impervious surfaces and associated urban runoff pollutants in new development and redevelopment.  Consistent. The Project would not result in a net increase of impervious surfaces from existing uses. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared to address long-term stormwater pollution from the proposed Project, and the Final WQMP would be approved by the City prior to issuance of the Demolition Permit. Based on the Preliminary WQMP, the proposed Project site would be regraded for drainage to flow to different specified catch basins and drop inlets, as described further in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-50 Environmental Analysis As discussed previously, the State policy and standards adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions that are applicable to the proposed Project are Executive Order S-3-05, AB 32, SB 375, and EO B-30-15. The quantitative goal of these regulations is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Statewide plans and regulations (such as GHG emissions standards for vehicles, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Cap-and-Trade, and renewable energy) are being implemented at the statewide level, and compliance at a project level is generally not addressed. However, for purposes of this analysis, a consistency analysis is provided for the applicable portions of the Scoping Plan Reduction Measures (CARB 2008). 3. Energy Efficiency. Maximize energy efficiency building and appliance standards; pursue additional efficiency including new technologies, policy, and implementation mechanisms. Pursue comparable investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California.  Consistent. This measure is for the State to increase its energy efficiency standards. However, the Project would be consistent with this, because it is required to comply with 2019 Title 24 standards. 9. Million Solar Roofs Program. Install 3,000 megawatts of solar-electric capacity under California’s existing solar programs.  Consistent. This measure is for the State to increase solar throughout California, which is being done by electricity providers and existing solar programs. Additionally, the Project would comply with 2019 Title 24 standards, which require solar photovoltaic systems for new homes. 13. Green Building Strategy. Expand the use of green building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of California’s new and existing inventory of buildings.  Consistent. The Project would comply with the California Energy Code (CEC), and would therefore incorporate applicable energy efficiency features designed to reduce energy consumption. 15. Recycling and Waste. Reduce CH4 emissions at landfills. Increase waste diversion, composting, and commercial recycling. Move toward zero waste.  Consistent. The Project would reduce waste with implementation of State-mandated recycling and reuse requirements for construction and operations activities. 17. Water. Continue efficiency programs and use cleaner energy sources to move and treat water.  Consistent. This measure is for State and local agencies; however, the Project would comply with the California Green Building Standards Code. Compliance with the Green Building Standards Code would increase efficiency for energy and water consumption. State regulations, plans, and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions that are directly applicable to the proposed Project include California Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and the Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). The proposed Project would be constructed in compliance with applicable requirements of these regulations. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-51 Environmental Analysis SCAG’s 2016-2040 RTP/SCS includes goals for reducing vehicle miles traveled and encourages the building of infill projects (SCAG 2016a). The proposed Project is a redevelopment project that would locate residences in a highly urbanized area, close to schools and parks. OCTA bus service is available on Taft Avenue, less than 2,000 feet from the site. As discussed previously, the Project would also result in less GHG emissions than those produced from the existing uses. Thus, the proposed Project would be consistent with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. The proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-52 Environmental Analysis HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The analysis in the MND indicated that Phase I Project construction would involve transport, use, and storage of hazardous materials. But it was found that after compliance with regulations, hazards from routine use of hazardous materials would be less than significant. The MND concluded that Project development would not increase the likelihood of accidental release of hazardous materials. As discussed in the MND, the Project site was used as a vehicle storage site since the 1960’s and as farmland from approximately 1938 to 1963. Soil sampling and testing was conducted to evaluate the potential presence of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and arsenic from past agricultural use. OCP and arsenic concentrations detected were below the California Human Health screening levels for residential properties. The MND did not identify potential hazardous materials contamination affecting the site and requiring further investigation. The MND determined that the Project site was outside of areas surrounding Fullerton Municipal Airport and John Wayne Airport where land uses are regulated to minimize aviation-related hazards to people on the ground, and that Phase I Project development would not cause significant aviation- related hazards. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-53 Environmental Analysis Additionally, the MND concluded that Phase I Project development would not interfere with implementation of the City of Orange’s Emergency Operations Plan. The MND determined that the Project site was not in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone; and that no wildland vegetation was present on or next to the Project site. The MND concluded that Project development would not exacerbate wildfire risks. Supplemental Evaluation A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared by CERES, Corp. in 2015 and is summarized below; the report is included as Appendix D1 to this Subsequent IS/MND. A database records search through Environmental Data Resources (EDR) was also conducted in 2018 to provide current documentation on potential issues pertaining to hazardous materials on and near the Project site. The EDR Report is summarized below and the report is included as Appendix D2 to this Subsequent IS/MND. Would the Project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Demolition and construction activities for the proposed Project would involve the use of chemical substances such as solvents, paints, fuel for equipment, and other potentially hazardous materials. Hazards to the environment or the public would typically occur with the transport, use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials. Demolition and construction activities would be relatively short- term and the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials as part of these activities would be temporary. The contractor would be required to comply with existing regulations for the transport, use, storage and disposal of hazardous materials to prevent public safety hazards. These regulations include the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), California Hazardous Waste Control Act (HWCA), and California Accidental Release Prevention Program (CalARP), among others. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Once constructed, the proposed dwelling units would use hazardous materials (e.g., paint, pesticides, cleansers, and solvents) for maintenance activities but any use would be in limited household quantities. The dwelling units would not utilize, store, or generate hazardous materials or wastes in quantities that would pose a significant hazard to the public. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Review of historical aerial photographs indicate the site was planted with trees (part of an orchard) as early as 1938 until it was developed with the existing shopping center in 1964. The smaller commercial/retail building was added in the late 1980s to early 1990s. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-54 Environmental Analysis The Phase 1 ESA did not identify the presence of previous or current hazardous materials or wastes on the site. No underground or aboveground storage tanks were observed, and no stains, corrosion, drains, sumps, pits, or wells are present on the site. The shopping center’s current tenants include retail stores, office, alternative school, and a restaurant. Former tenants included a grocery store, liquor store, laundry, pharmacy, hardware store, beauty shop, hobby shop, cleaners, car rental, flooring company, and various other retail stores, restaurants, and offices. A leaking underground storage tank was reported at 2010 North Orange Olive Road (north of the site) in 1987, but the case was closed in 1988. Commercial and industrial uses near the site do not represent a significant environmental concern due to their distances or case status. No evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) (either historical or controlled) was found on the site, and no additional assessment was recommended (Ceres 2015). Based on the 2018 EDR record search, the Project site is not listed as a facility that handled hazardous materials or generated hazardous wastes (EDR 2018). The nearest facility that is listed in government databases is the Orange Fire Station on Shaffer Street. Various other industrial uses west of the BNSF railroad tracks are listed as hazardous materials users and generators. These uses would not be disturbed by the Project and would not pose a significant hazard to the Project due to distance. Adjacent to the site are residential land uses to the north and east, and Shaffer Park to the south, which do not store, use, or dispose of hazardous materials in quantities that may pose hazards to the public. The adjacent BNSF railroad may transport hazardous materials in large quantities. However, the Project does not propose ground disturbance or construction activities within the railroad right- of-way and occupancy of the proposed dwelling units would not affect rail operations. A natural gas pipeline owned by Southern California Gas Company runs along North Orange Olive Road, west of the site (PHMSA 2018). Excavation activities on Orange Olive Road (for utility connections for the Project) may potentially occur over or near this pipeline. The California Code of Regulations (Title 8; Section 1541, General Requirements) requires excavators to identify subsurface installations prior to opening an excavation and to ensure that the underground lines are marked. The excavators must inform all known owners/operators of subsurface installations and lines and must meet with owners/operators of high priority subsurface installations (e.g., high pressure pipelines, natural gas/petroleum pipelines, electrical lines greater than 60,000 volts) that may be located within 10 feet of a proposed excavation, before starting the excavation (see RR HAZ-1). Contractor compliance with this regulation would prevent the potential disturbance of the nearby pipeline during excavation activities on North Orange Olive Road. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Because of the age of the shopping center, asbestos and lead are likely to have been used for construction (Ceres 2015). As part of the demolition activities, ACM and LBP may be disturbed and contact with these materials would pose hazards to the construction crew and other persons near the construction site. Demolition, removal, and disposal of ACM and LBP are required to comply with existing regulatory requirements, including the Federal and State Occupational Safety and Health Regulations (OSHA and CalOSHA); SCAQMD Regulation X, Subpart M − National Emission Standards For Asbestos and Rule 1403 – Asbestos Emissions (see RR HAZ-3); and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 1532.1 – Lead and Section 1529 – Asbestos (see RR HAZ-2 and RR HAZ-4). Compliance with these regulations would be included on the contractor specifications and verified by the City’s Community Development Director, or designee in conjunction with the issuance of the Demolition Permit. Compliance with RR HAZ-2 through RR HAZ-4 would ensure that no impacts pertaining to demolition would occur. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-55 Environmental Analysis Regulatory Requirements: RR HAZ-1 In accordance with Title 8; Section 1541, General Requirements, of the California Code of Regulations, excavators shall identify subsurface installations and inform all known owners/operators of subsurface installations and lines prior to opening an excavation. The excavators shall meet with owners/operators of high-pressure pipelines, natural gas/petroleum pipelines, electrical lines greater than 60,000 volts, and other high priority subsurface installations that are located within 10 feet of a proposed excavation, before starting the excavation. RR HAZ-2 The demolition contractor shall comply with the requirements of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (Section 1532.1-Lead) regarding the removal of lead- based paint or other materials containing lead. The regulations set exposure limits, exposure monitoring, respiratory protection, and good working practices by workers exposed to lead. Lead-contaminated debris and other wastes shall be removed and monitored by contractors with appropriate certifications from the California Department of Health Services and disposed of in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Health and Safety Code. RR HAZ-3 The demolition contractor shall comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) Rule 1403, which provides guidelines for the proper removal and disposal of asbestos-containing materials. In accordance with Rule 1403, prior to the demolition, renovation, rehabilitation or alteration of structures that may contain asbestos, an asbestos survey shall be performed by a Certified Asbestos Consultant (certified by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration [CalOSHA]) to identify building materials that contain asbestos. Removal of the asbestos shall then include prior notification of the SCAQMD and compliance with removal procedures and time schedules; asbestos handling and clean-up procedures; and storage, disposal, and landfilling requirements under Rule 1403. RR HAZ-4 The demolition contractor shall comply with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 39650 et seq.) and the California Code of Regulations (Title 8, Section 1529), which prohibit emissions of asbestos from asbestos-related demolition or construction activities; require medical examinations and monitoring of employees engaged in activities that could disturb asbestos; specify precautions and safe work practices that must be followed to minimize the potential for the release of asbestos fibers; and require notice to federal and local government agencies prior to beginning renovation or demolition that could disturb asbestos. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Existing schools located within a 0.25-mile radius of the Project site include the Project Hope School (at the Project site), Covenant Christian School (0.14 mile to the south) and International School of Orange County (0.18 mile also to the south). Other nearby schools, farther than 0.25-mile radius, include Early Childhood Montessori Preschool (0.26 mile to the north), Taft Elementary School (0.35 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-56 Environmental Analysis mile to the southeast), Saint Norbert Catholic Church and School (0.35 mile to the south), and Tec- Canal Street Elementary School/Olive Crest Academy (0.46 mile to the northeast). With the exception of the Project Hope School, which would relocate prior to Project construction, there is a potential to expose children at these nearby schools to hazardous substances through accidental releases during demolition and construction activities. However, during demolition, existing hazardous materials and wastes would be removed and disposed in accordance with pertinent regulations, including RR HAZ-2 through RR HAZ-4, as discussed above. During construction, a potential exists for the accidental release or spill of hazardous substances such as gasoline, oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, or other liquids associated with construction equipment operation and maintenance. However, use of these materials would be in limited quantities as typical during the operation and maintenance of construction equipment and would be conducted in compliance with applicable federal, State and local regulations. Additionally, the contractor would be required to use standard construction controls and safety procedures, which would avoid and minimize the potential for accidental release or spill of such substances into the environment. With compliance with pertinent regulations (RR HAZ-2 through RR HAZ-4), the level of risk associated with the accidental release of hazardous substances during demolition and construction would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Residential activities associated with occupancy of the proposed dwelling units would be similar to other residential uses surrounding the site and would not generate hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste in quantities that may impact students at schools within 0.25 mile of the site. No long-term impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? According to the Phase I ESA, 2018 EDR record search, and review of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List – Site Cleanup (Cortese List), the Project site is not included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 (Ceres 2015, EDR 2018, DTSC 2018). Therefore, the Project does not have the potential to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment due to presence of an existing hazardous materials site identified on the Cortese List. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-57 Environmental Analysis e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The Project site is not located within two miles of an airport. The nearest public airports are the Fullerton Municipal Airport, located 7.8 miles northwest of the Project site, and the John Wayne Airport (JWA), located approximately 9.3 miles south of the site. The Project site is not located within the planning areas (including the Runway Protection Zones, Safety Compatibility Zones, and Airport Impact Zones) for these airports (OCALUC 2008, 2004). Thus, the Project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing on the site, as it relates to exposure to airport or aircraft hazards in areas within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The City of Orange has an emergency plan, called an “Emergency Operations Plan,” prepared in accordance with the State Office of Emergency Services guidelines for multi-hazard functional planning (Orange 2010a). The Project site is not in the vicinity of any emergency evacuation corridors, and North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue are not designated evacuation corridors in the Public Safety Element of the Orange General Plan. Temporary lane closures on adjacent streets (Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue) may be required during the short-term construction period in order to connect the proposed Project to the existing utility infrastructure within these roadways. However, Project construction would not involve full closure of any public roadway during construction. Implementation of traffic control measures during construction in accordance with the City of Orange Department of Public Works Standard Plans & Specifications (City Standard Plans) and Chapter 12.02, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, of the Municipal Code, which adopts the Greenbook by reference (see RR HAZ-5), would reduce the potential for traffic hazards and the obstruction of access to adjacent parcels. Impacts would be short- term and less than significant, and no mitigation is required. In the long-term, the Project would provide an access driveway off East Grove Avenue that would be used for emergency response to the site and for emergency evacuation of the site. The Project would not affect emergency response or emergency evacuation of adjacent land uses. Additionally, as indicated above, North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue are not designated evacuation corridors in the Public Safety Element of the Orange General Plan. No long-term impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR HAZ-5 All construction on public rights-of-way shall include the implementation of traffic control measures in accordance with the City of Orange Department of Public Works Standard Plans & Specifications (City Standard Plans) and Orange Municipal Code Chapter 12.20, Street Excavation, and Chapter 12.02, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, which adopts the Greenbook by reference. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-58 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? The Project site is located in a highly urbanized area of the City, and there are no large, undeveloped areas and/or steep slopes on or near the site that may pose wildfire hazards. The site and the surrounding areas are not located in designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), as identified by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CalFire). Rather, the site is within a Non-VHFHSZ area, with the nearest VHFHSZ located approximately 2.1 miles northeast of the site (CalFire 2011). Additionally, based on review of Figure PS-1, Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Map in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, the Project site is not located within designated Wildland Very High Fire Hazard Areas or Wildland High Fire Hazard Areas (Orange 2010a). Implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people or structures directly or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, or death associated wildland fires. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-59 Environmental Analysis HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? f) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? g) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post- construction activities? h) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? i) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? j) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? k) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The Phase I Project MND determined that Project construction and operation were each expected to generate suspended soils, nutrients, heavy metals, pathogens, pesticides, oil and grease, toxic organic Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-60 Environmental Analysis compounds, and trash and debris. The MND noted that Project construction would comply with the Statewide General Construction Permit through preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which would specify BMPs to be used during construction to minimize storm water pollution. Construction water quality impacts were identified as less than significant after regulatory compliance. Project design incorporated Best Management Practices (BMPs) including dry wells; minimizing impervious areas; and creating reduced or “zero discharge” areas. Operational water quality impacts were determined to be less than significant after compliance with City of Orange water quality requirements. The MND concluded that the Project site was outside of 100-year flood hazard zones and that the west edge of the Project site was in the dam inundation area of Prado Dam. The MND determined that recent improvements to Prado Dam would reduce dam inundation hazard, and that Project flood hazard impacts would be less than significant. Supplemental Evaluation A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared by DRC Engineering, Inc. for the proposed Project in compliance with the requirements of the County of Orange NPDES Stormwater Program. The Preliminary WQMP (DRC 2019a) is summarized below, and the report is included as Appendix E to this Subsequent IS/MND. Would the Project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Short-Term Water Quality Impacts Implementation of the proposed Project would involve demolition of the existing shopping center, surface parking lot, and associated site improvements, in addition to construction of the proposed dwelling units and site improvements. Therefore, the Project has the potential to result in short-term construction impacts to surface water quality from demolition, grading, and construction-related activities. Storm water runoff from the construction site would contain loose soils, organic matter, and sediments. Spills or leaks from heavy equipment and machinery, such as fuel, oil and grease, and heavy metals, could also enter the runoff. Building construction would involve the use of hazardous materials (e.g., paints, solvents, cleansers) that, if not properly handled, may enter the stormwater runoff. The Clean Water Act (CWA) establishes a framework for regulating potential water quality impacts from construction activities, as well as new development and major redevelopment, through the NPDES program. Construction activities that disturb one acre or more of land are required to obtain an NPDES permit or coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit. This is accomplished by completing and filing Permit Registration Documents (PRD) (including a Notice of Intent, a SWPPP, an annual fee, and a signed certification) with the SWRCB prior to start of construction activities. The BMPs in the SWPPP are implemented during construction to reduce storm water pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. Coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit and implementation of the Project’s SWPPP (see RR HYD-1) would ensure that short-term, construction-related water quality impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-61 Environmental Analysis Long-Term Water Quality Impacts Stormwater pollutants that would be generated by the Project in the long-term include sediment, trash and debris, oil and grease, bacterial, nutrients, and pesticides that would come from landscaped areas, drive aisles, parking areas, and outdoor residential activities. In accordance with the NPDES program, the Orange County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit and Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), and Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater Discharges, of the Orange Municipal Code, the proposed Project is considered a Priority Project as it would create impervious surfaces exceeding 5,000 sf. It should be noted that the Project site is currently comprised of 94 percent impervious surface and the proposed Project would not result in a net increase of impervious surfaces. However, because the Project would result in impervious surfaces exceeding 5,000 sf, preparation of a project WQMP is required, pursuant to the Orange County Model WQMP and Technical Guidance Document (TGD). A Preliminary WQMP (Appendix E) has been prepared to address long-term stormwater pollution from the proposed Project, and the Final WQMP would be approved by the City prior to issuance of the Demolition Permit. Based on the Preliminary WQMP, the proposed Project site would be regraded for drainage to flow to different specified catch basins and drop inlets. This captured discharge would be treated through one of two on-site modular wetlands biofiltration units before the runoff would be discharged to the storm drain line in East Grove Avenue. With the Project, stormwater pollutants from the shopping center (including pollutants from landscaped areas, loading areas, drive aisles, and surface parking areas) would be replaced with pollutants from residential uses (landscaped areas, internal drive aisles, and outdoor parking spaces). As discussed above, stormwater from the Project would be treated prior to off-site discharge. The Project would also have to comply with the City’s stormwater regulations in Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater Discharges, of the Orange Municipal Code, related to prohibited connections and discharges. Thus, with implementation of permanent BMPs in the WQMP, the Project site would generate less stormwater pollutants than under existing conditions. The Project’s potential to generate substantial amounts of polluted runoff would be less than significant. Regarding groundwater, although the Project site overlies the Coastal Plain of Orange County Groundwater Basin, there are no groundwater wells on the Project site and no wells are proposed as part of the Project. The Project site offers limited opportunities for groundwater recharge because the majority of the site is currently developed with impervious surfaces and would remain paved with the Project. Due to the surface water quality regulations identified above, the proposed Project would not substantially degrade groundwater quality or interfere with groundwater quality. The demolition and construction activities of the proposed Project would result in pollutants that may enter the stormwater runoff from the site. However, as discussed above in the response to Threshold a), implementation of BMPs in the SWPPP for the Project would reduce these pollutants (RR HYD-1). As outlined in the Preliminary WQMP for the Project, permanent on-site treatment of stormwater would be provided by one of two onsite modular wetlands biofiltration units (RR HYD- 2), which does not currently occur with the existing shopping center. Thus, beneficial impacts on stormwater quality would occur with the Project. With compliance of RR HYD-1 and RR HYD-2, and based on the above information, the Project would not violate any water quality standards and would not degrade surface or ground water quality by contributing pollutants or discharge. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-62 Environmental Analysis Regulatory Requirements: RR HYD-1 Prior to demolition and construction activities on the site, the Contractor shall prepare and file a Permit Registration Document (PRD) with the State Water Resources Control Board in order to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No 2009-009- DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002) or the latest approved Construction General Permit. The PRD shall consist of a Notice of Intent (NOI); a Risk Assessment; a Site Map; a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); an annual fee; and a signed certification statement. Pursuant to permit requirements, the Project Applicant/Developer shall implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the SWPPP to reduce or eliminate construction-related pollutants in site runoff. The BMPs shall be implemented during all demolition and construction activities on the site. RR HYD-2 In accordance with Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater Discharges, of the Orange Municipal Code, the Project shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the Project and approved by the City. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? The Coastal Plain of Orange County Groundwater Basin underlies the northern and central sections of Orange County within the Lower Santa Ana River Watershed, which includes the Project site (Orange 2010a). The Orange County Water District (OCWD) manages this Groundwater Basin to prevent overdraft conditions, seawater intrusion, land subsidence, and groundwater quality degradation. The recharge basins for the Orange County Groundwater Basin are located in and adjacent to the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek. The Natural Resources Element of the City of Orange General Plan does not show the site as adjacent to these waterways or recharge facilities (Orange 2010a). As indicated above in Response 4.10a, there are no groundwater wells on the Project site and no wells are proposed as part of the Project. The Project site offers limited opportunities for groundwater recharge because approximately 94 percent of the site is currently developed with impervious surfaces and would decrease to 83 percent impervious with the Project (Appendix E). The proposed Project would not involve direct withdrawals of groundwater, nor would it interfere with groundwater recharge such that it would result in a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table levels. Excavation activities would not extend into the underlying groundwater, which was last measured at 172 feet below the ground surface (DWR 2018a). Domestic water service to the Project would be provided by the City of Orange, as described in Section 4.19, Utilities and Service Systems, of this Subsequent IS/MND, with water derived from groundwater, surface water, and imported water supplies. Indirect impacts on local groundwater supplies due to water consumption by the Project (estimated at 15,190 gallons per day [gpd] or 17 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-63 Environmental Analysis acre-feet)3 would not be large enough to measurably affect the City’s annual water supplies (28,643 acre-feet4 in 2015) (Orange 2016b). Also, the groundwater resources in the Coastal Plain of Orange County Groundwater Basin are managed by the OCWD to maintain withdrawals within a safe basin operating range to protect the basin’s long-term sustainability. With OCWD incentives to limit groundwater pumping by the City and other water suppliers and with the water conservation measures required in new developments, the proposed Project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies, interfere with groundwater recharge, or impede sustainable groundwater management of the Groundwater Basin. Indirect impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; As indicated in Response 4.7b, Geology and Soils, the Project would be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit. The Construction General Permit requires preparation of a SWPPP and implementation of erosion control, sediment control, tracking, waste management, and construction site maintenance BMPs to reduce the potential for soil and wind erosion during construction activities (see RR HYD-1). Further, the proposed Project must comply with the City’s grading ordinance, which requires preparation of an erosion and sediment control plan for City approval prior to issuance of a grading permit (see RR GEO-2). With compliance with these regulations, construction-related erosion would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. While the proposed Project would increase the amount of pervious surfaces at the Project site, the pervious surfaces such as the common open space area in the center of the site, would be landscaped, to prevent potential erosion. There would be minimal areas of exposed soils following completion of the proposed Project where erosion could occur. Site improvements and landscaping would also prevent long-term erosion (RR HYD-2). With increased pervious surfaces on the site, the runoff volume and rate are expected to decrease; resulting in less potential for downstream erosion. Therefore, operation-related erosion would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR HYD-2 above. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required 3 Based on the City’s 2015 UWMP, which showed a 2015 average consumption of 155 gallons per capita per day and 98 residents. 4 One acre-foot is equivalent to 325,851 gallons. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-64 Environmental Analysis ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; Currently, 94 percent of the Project site is covered with impervious surfaces, which would decrease to 83 percent with implementation of the proposed Project. The Preliminary WQMP indicates that the proposed Project site would be regraded for drainage to flow to different specified catch basins and drop inlets. This captured discharge would be treated through one of two on-site modular wetlands biofiltration units before the runoff would be discharged to the storm drain line in East Grove Avenue. A hydrologic conditions of concern analysis was conducted for the Preliminary WQMP and evaluated the 2-year storm. Based on this evaluation, it was determined that while the peak flow would increase with the proposed Project from 4.27 cfs to 4.79 cfs, the volume of the 2 year storm would remain the same at 0.44 cfs. Based on this information, while the peak flow would increase slightly with the proposed Project, the overall volume would remain the same as under existing conditions. The proposed changes resulting from the Project site would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or Currently, 94 percent of the Project site is covered with impervious surfaces, which decrease to 83 percent with implementation of the proposed Project. The proposed BMPs, as included in the Preliminary WQMP, would provide storm water treatment, where no treatment occurs under existing conditions. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Additionally, the Project would not result in increased off-site flows, and therefore no exceedance of the capacity of off-site storm drainage infrastructure would occur. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required iv) impede or redirect flood flows? As previously mentioned, the Project site is located within Flood Zone X, which includes areas determined to be outside the 100-year and 500-year floodplains (FEMA 2009). Based on review of Figure PS-1, Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Map in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, the Project site is not located within the 100-year flood area. Because the Project site is not located within the 100-year floodplain and does not receive stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, the Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area and Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-65 Environmental Analysis would not impede or redirect flood waters. No impacts related to the redirection of flood flows would occur, and no mitigation is required. Under the existing condition, site drainage consists of sheet flow from the buildings and surface parking areas towards East Grove Avenue and through a ribbon gutter and catch basins at the northern drive aisle for discharge into North Orange Olive Road. Runoff then flows along the street gutters toward the existing catch basin on East Grove Avenue and into underground storm drain lines that tie into Collins Channel and eventually flows into the Santa Ana River. According to the Preliminary WQMP, the proposed Project site would be regraded for drainage to flow to different specified catch basins and drop inlets. This captured discharge would be treated through one of two on-site modular wetlands biofiltration units before the runoff would be discharged to the storm drain line in East Grove Avenue. The runoff would subsequently be conveyed to Collins Channel, the Santa Ana River, and the Pacific Ocean. Based on the Project stormwater flows, shown in Table 4-14, Hydrologic Conditions of Concern, the Project would slightly increase the 2- year peak storm flow but would not increase its 2-year storm volume. This increase in the 2-year peak storm flow would not alter the course of this channel and other downstream facilities. Implementation of temporary and permanent erosion control BMPs in the Project’s SWPPP and WQMP (see RR HYD-1 and RR HYD-2) would ensure that substantial erosion or siltation would not occur on- or off-site during short-term construction and long-term occupancy of the dwelling units. The increase in pervious surfaces on the site is expected to reduce the runoff volume and rate; resulting in less potential for downstream erosion. Thus, the Project would not result in erosion or siltation that would alter the drainage pattern of the area. Project impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. TABLE 4-14 HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN 2 Year Peak Flow Q2 (CFS) 2 Year Volume V2 (CF) Time of Concentration Tc (Min) Existing 4.27 0.44 10.36 Proposed 4.79 0.44 10.06 DRC 2019a Regulatory Requirements: See RR HYD-1 and RR HYD-2 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? A seiche is the resonant oscillation of a body of water caused by earthquake shaking (waves). Seiche hazards exist where groundshaking causes water to splash out of the body of water and inundate nearby areas and structures. The site is not located near a large body of water that may be subject to seiche. Tsunamis are seismic sea waves generated by undersea earthquakes or landslides. The City of Orange is not located along the coast, and the Project site is approximately 14.3 miles from the Pacific Ocean. The Orange County Tsunami Inundation Maps also do not identify the site as being within the Tsunami Inundation Area (CGS 2018b). Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-66 Environmental Analysis The Project site is relatively flat. There are no hillside areas on site or in the surrounding area that could generate mudflow. As a result, no impacts related to seiche, tsunami or mudflow would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? As discussed above in Response 4.10a, the Project would be in compliance with applicable water quality regulations for short-term and long-term impacts. Specifically, the Project would have coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit and implementation of the Project’s SWPPP (see RR HYD-1) would ensure that short-term, construction-related water quality impacts would be less than significant. For long-term water quality impacts, in accordance with the NPDES program, the Orange County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit and Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), and Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater Discharges, of the Orange Municipal Code, a Preliminary WQMP has been prepared and stormwater from the Project would be treated prior to off-site discharge. The Project would also comply with the City’s stormwater regulations in Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater Discharges, of the Orange Municipal Code, related to prohibited connections and discharges. Thus, with implementation of permanent BMPs in the WQMP, the Project site would generate less stormwater pollutants than under existing conditions. As indicated above in Response 4.10a, there are no groundwater wells on the Project site and no wells are proposed as part of the Project. The proposed Project would not involve direct withdrawals of groundwater, nor would it interfere with groundwater recharge such that it would result in a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table levels. Excavation activities would not extend into the underlying groundwater, which was last measured at 172 feet below the ground surface (DWR 2018a). Therefore, the Project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. Impacts are less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required f) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? Storm water runoff from construction and demolition activities on the site could contain pollutants such as soils and sediments that are released during grading and excavation activities and petroleum- related pollutants due to spills or leaks from heavy equipment and machinery. Other common pollutants include solid or liquid chemical spills; concrete and related cutting or curing residues; wastes from paints, stains, sealants, solvents, detergents, glues, acids, lime, plaster, and cleaning agents; and heavy metals from equipment. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-67 Environmental Analysis Construction pollutants from the site would need to be reduced by preparation and implementation of a SWPPP, as required under the Construction General Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The SWPPP will include BMPs for erosion control, sediment control, wind erosion control, soil, and debris tracking control; waste management; material storage; wastewater; liquids; hazardous materials; stockpiles; equipment and other site conditions in order to prevent pollutants from entering the storm drain system. Inspections, reporting, and storm water sampling and analysis are also required in the SWPPP to ensure that visible and non-visible pollutants are not discharged off site. Implementation of the SWPPP (refer to RR HYD-1) would reduce storm water pollutants during construction to less than significant levels and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required g) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post-construction activities? Operation of the proposed Project would generate pollutants (including loose soils, organic materials, fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides from landscaped areas, trash and debris, oil and grease, and heavy metals from paved areas) that may enter storm water. As indicated in Checklist Responses (a) and (f) above, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the State General Construction Permit during construction. The City of Orange LID regulations, which require preparation of a WQMP, also include the requirement for BMPs such as LID features to minimize the discharge of pollutants. On-site modular wetlands bioinfiltration units are proposed to filter storm water and irrigation water, slightly reducing runoff flows over existing conditions. Operation and maintenance practices and public education programs to reduce pollutants in the storm water would also be implemented, as part of the WQMP. With implementation of the BMPs contained in the WQMP for the Project (refer to RR HYD-2), the impact to storm water runoff from post-construction activities would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required h) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? Construction and demolition activities on the site would include BMPs for waste management, material storage, wastewater, liquids, hazardous materials, stockpiles, equipment, and other site conditions in order to prevent pollutants from entering the storm drain system. Implementation of these BMPs as part of the SWPPP would reduce storm water pollutants during construction and demolition. Post construction activities will be limited to standard residential activities not to include the listed activities of concern. The on-site biofiltration units would filter site runoff and provide pollutant removal prior to the release of runoff, which would be discharged to the storm drain line in East Grove Avenue. With implementation of the Project BMPs, RR HYD-1 and RR HYD-2, impacts would be less than significant, no mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-68 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required i) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? As indicated in Threshold Responses 4.10.c.ii and 4.10.c.iv, runoff from the Project site would subsequently be conveyed to the Collins Channel, the Santa Ana River Reach 2, and ultimately the Pacific Ocean. The Project would not alter the course of Collins Channel and other downstream facilities. Implementation of temporary and permanent erosion control BMPs in the Project’s SWPPP and WQMP (see RR HYD-1 and RR HYD-2) would ensure that substantial erosion or siltation would not occur on- or off-site during short-term construction and long-term occupancy of the dwelling units. The increase in pervious surfaces on the site is expected to reduce the runoff volume and rate; resulting in less potential for downstream erosion. Thus, the Project would not result in erosion or siltation that would alter the drainage pattern of the area. Project impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Beneficial uses of waters in the Santa Ana River include agricultural supply; groundwater recharge; water contact and non-water contact recreation; warm freshwater habitat; wildlife habitat; and habitat for Rare, Threatened, or Endangered species. The Santa Ana River Reach 2 was listed in 2010 as an impaired water body per Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act but was delisted in 2016. Storm water pollutants from construction and demolition activities at the site would be reduced by the implementation of BMPs identified in the Project SWPPP. Storm water pollutants during operation and use of the proposed Project would also be reduced with implementation of BMPs (modular wetlands System biofiltration unit), implemented as part of the WQMP for the Project. With implementation of the BMPs identified in the SWPPP and WQMP (RR HYD-1 and RR HYD-2), pollutants would be reduced on the Project site and prevented from entering the storm water system to minimize their impacts on downstream beneficial uses. Therefore, storm water pollutants from the Project site are not expected to adversely affect the beneficial uses of these waters, and the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required j) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? The site is currently developed with a commercial structure, including driveways and a parking lot. Reconstruction of the site would replace existing structures with the proposed Project. As indicated in the WQMP (Appendix E), the Project site is currently 6 percent pervious and 94 percent impervious. Following construction of the proposed Project, the site would be 17 percent pervious and 83 percent impervious (DRC 2019a). The proposed Project would increase the amount of pervious surfaces at the Project site, which would result in greater site infiltration of storm water within these areas. Therefore, no increase in runoff volume or velocity is anticipated with the proposed Project, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-69 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required k) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? As discussed above, erosion may occur on site during demolition and construction activities. This would be reduced by the implementation of erosion-control BMPs, as outlined in the Project SWPPP. Long-term erosion is not expected since the site will be paved or built over and open areas landscaped. The proposed Project would also provide one of two on-site biofiltration units that would prevent long-term erosion at the site. Erosion impacts would be less than significant with implementation of the SWPPP and WQMP (RR HYD-1 and RR HYD-2). No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-70 Environmental Analysis LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The MND determined that Phase I Project development would not divide an established community or conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. As discussed in the MND, the construction of 25 single-family residential units would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of LMDR, which would allow construction of 14 to 35 residential units of a variety of single-family and/or multifamily types. The MND identified the site zoning as Limited Business (C-1) and indicated that the zoning was non-conforming with the General Plan designation. The Phase I Project included a Specific Plan (i.e., Orange-Olive Specific Plan. Development standards for the Project site under the Specific Plan would be similar to the standards specified under the City’s Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone. Adoption of the Specific Plan was required as part of Project approval. Upon adoption of the Specific Plan, the Phase I Project would be consistent with both the General Plan designation (Specific Plan) and the development standards for the Project site under the Specific Plan. It was determined that Project development would not conflict with applicable plans, policies, and regulations and land use impacts would be less than significant. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Physically divide an established community? As shown in the aerial photograph provided in Exhibit 2-1, the Project site is currently developed with the Shaffer Park Center that consists of two commercial/retail buildings and associated surface parking areas and site improvements. The Project site is bordered by North Orange Olive Road on the west, with the BNSF railroad tracks and light industrial uses farther west, across North Orange Olive Road. East Grove Avenue defines the southern boundary of the site, with Shaffer Park across the street and residential uses farther south. The Project site is bound by Phase I of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan (existing residential uses to the north) and existing residential to the east. Thus, the site is located at the edge of a residential community in the City of Orange. The Project is Phase II of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan and proposes to redevelop the site with 32 dwelling units. The proposed dwelling units would generally be similar to Phase I to the north and existing residential land uses to the east. Therefore, the Project would not divide or disrupt the physical arrangement of an established community but would serve as an extension of an existing residential area. No impact would on occur on an established community, and no mitigation is required. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-71 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? With respect to regional planning, SCAG is the MPO for Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial counties. As the designated MPO, the federal government mandates SCAG to prepare plans for growth management, transportation, air quality, and hazardous waste management. In addition, SCAG reviews projects of regional significance for consistency with regional plans. SCAG’s regional planning programs, including the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP), Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), and RTP/SCS, are not directly applicable to the proposed Project because the Project is not of Statewide, regional or area-wide significance, as defined by Section 15206 of the CEQA Guidelines. However, the Project would contribute to new housing development in the City of Orange; thus, contributing to the City’s RHNA housing goal of 363 new dwelling units between 2014 and 2021 (SCAG 2012). Local plans and programs relevant to the Project and the consistency of the proposed Project with these plans and programs, which include the Orange-Olive Specific Plan, City of Orange General Plan and Zoning Code/Municipal Code, are discussed below. Orange-Olive Specific Plan The Project is proposed as Phase II of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan, which would require a Specific Plan Amendment to include the parcel that comprises the 2.9-acre Phase II Project site, as described in Section 3.0, Project Description. The proposed discretionary actions as described in Section 3.0 would allow for (1) the Specific Plan boundary to be adjusted to include the 2.9-acre parcel that is outside of the Specific Plan boundary and (2) other changes to the Specific Plan’s land use, design and development regulations and standards, and infrastructure systems to allow for development of the proposed Project. The proposed Zone Change would make the zoning designation of the site consistent with its LMDR General Plan land use designation, as shown in the Land Use Policy Map in the General Plan, and would, in turn, make the Project consistent with the Zoning Code. City of Orange General Plan The City of Orange General Plan was adopted on March 9, 2010 and is organized into 11 elements: (1) Land Use, (2) Circulation and Mobility, (3) Growth Management, (4) Natural Resources, (5) Public Safety, (6) Noise, (7) Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation, (8) Infrastructure, (9) Urban Design, (10) Economic Development, and (11) Housing (which was adopted under separate cover on April 13, 2010). Each element contains the City’s goals and policies related to that element. An analysis of how the Project is applicable to each element is described below. Additionally, an evaluation of the Project’s consistency with applicable goals and policies from the City’s General plan is Provided in Table 4-15, Proposed Project General Plan Consistency Analysis. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-72 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-15 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Land Use Element GOAL 1.0: Meet the present and future needs of all residential and business sectors with a diverse and balanced mix of land uses. Policy 1.4: Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development. Consistent. The Project is located in a primarily residential area with residential uses to the north (Irving House) and east. Schaffer Park is located to the south and light industrial uses are located to the west, across North Orange Olive Road. The proposed Project is Phase II of the previously City-approved Irving House development to the north. The Project is consistent with the development standards identified in the amended Specific Plan for the Irving House development. Additionally, the Project would be subject to design review by the City’s Design Review Committee, which would ensure that the Project has an internally consistent, integrated design theme in terms or architectural features, landscaping, signage, and secondary functional and accessory features, compatible with the existing development. Policy 1.6: Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and character of surrounding neighborhoods. Consistent. There are single family residential uses to the north and east. An existing wall located on the northern and eastern boundaries of the Project site would remain to provide a visual buffer from adjacent properties. Also, new landscaping, setbacks and additional walls and fencing would further create buffering from adjacent properties. GOAL 6.0: Advance development activity that is mutually beneficial to both the environment and the community. Policy 6.1: Ensure that new development is compatible with the style and design of established structures and the surrounding environment. Consistent. As indicated above under Policy 1.4, the proposed Project is Phase II of the previously City- approved Irving House development to the north. The proposed Project is consistent with the development standards identified in the amended Specific Plan for the Irving House development. Additionally, the Project would be subject to design review by the City’s Design Review Committee, which would ensure that the Project has an internally consistent, integrated design theme in terms or architectural features, landscaping, signage, and secondary functional and accessory features. Policy 6.5: Reduce pollutant runoff from new development and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable. Consistent. The Project site is currently 6 percent pervious and 94 percent impervious; however, post construction, the site would be 17 percent pervious and 83 percent impervious. With a decrease in impervious surface, the runoff volume and rate are expected to decrease resulting in less runoff. In addition, a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared to address long-term Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-73 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-15 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Land Use Element stormwater pollution from the proposed Project, and the Final WQMP would be approved by the City prior to issuance of the Demolition Permit. Policy 6.8: Maximize landscaping along streetscapes and within development projects to enhance public health and environmental benefits. Consistent. The Project would include private open space along streetscapes with landscaping within these areas. The frontage along Orange-Olive Road would be landscaped with drought tolerant trees and plants, like the Phase I Irving House frontage landscaping to ensure a consistent landscape design. Policy 6.10: Mitigate adverse air, noise, circulation, and other environmental impacts caused by new development adjacent to existing neighborhoods through use of sound walls, landscaping buffers, speed limits, and other traffic control measures. Consistent. The proposed Project includes noise mitigation measures (MM NOI-1 through MM NOI-6) to mitigate potential short- (construction) and long- term (operation) noise impacts. Air quality and traffic impacts were determined to be less than significant with no mitigation. Growth Management Element Policy 2.4: Explore infill development or mixed-use opportunities wherever possible as developable space becomes more limited. Consistent. The Project is an infill residential development compatible with land uses surrounding the Project. Natural Resources Element GOAL 2.0: Protect air, water, and energy resources from pollution and overuse. Policy 2.13: Control surface runoff water discharges into the stormwater conveyance system to comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Permit and other regional permits issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Consistent. The Project would comply with the NPDES requirements under the NPDES Construction General Permit, which requires preparation of a SWPPP (RR HYD-1). A WQMP was prepared to address long-term stormwater pollution from the proposed Project, and the Final WQMP would be approved by the City prior to issuance of the Demolition Permit. Policy 2.14: Reduce pollutant runoff from new development by requiring use of the most low development impact practices and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) currently available. Consistent. The Project would implement BMPs identified in the SWPPP and WQMP to reduce pollutant runoff. Policy 2.15: Minimize the amount of impervious surfaces and associated urban runoff pollutants in new development and significant redevelopment throughout the community. Consistent. The Project site is currently 6 percent pervious and 94 percent impervious; however, post construction, the site would be 17 percent pervious and 83 percent impervious. With a decrease in impervious surface, the runoff volume and rate are expected to decrease resulting in less runoff. In addition, a Preliminary WQMP was prepared to address long-term stormwater pollution from the proposed Project, and the Final WQMP would be approved by the City prior to issuance of the Demolition Permit. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-74 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-15 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Land Use Element Noise Element GOAL 1.0: Promote a pattern of land uses compatible with current and future noise levels. Policy 1.2: Encourage new development projects to provide sufficient spatial buffers to separate excessive noise generating land uses and noise- sensitive land uses. Consistent. The Project includes common landscape area along street frontages, entry along East Grove Avenue, and interior of Project site to buffer proposed residences from adjacent streets and interior roadways. An existing perimeter wall along the north and east boundaries of the Project site would provide an additional buffer between the proposed Project and surrounding residences. Policy 1.4: Ensure that acceptable noise levels are maintained near noise-sensitive uses. Consistent. The proposed Project includes noise mitigation measures (MM NOI-1 through MM NOI-6) to mitigate potential short- and long-term noise impacts. With implementation of mitigation, noise impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Policy 1.6: Require an acoustical study for proposed developments in areas where the existing and projected noise level exceeds or would exceed the maximum allowable levels identified in Table N-3. The acoustical study shall be performed in accordance with the requirements set forth within this Noise Element. Consistent. MM NOI-5 requires a noise analysis demonstrating that interior noise levels would be 45 dBA CNEL or less and exterior common use areas proximate to North Orange Olive Road would be located behind the buildings or shielded by a sound wall or other barrier to ensure exterior noise levels do not exceed 65 dBA CNEL. GOAL 7.0: Minimize construction, maintenance vehicle, and nuisance noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 7.2: Require developers and contractors to employ noise minimizing techniques during construction and maintenance operations. Consistent. The proposed Project includes noise mitigation measures (MM NOI-1 through MM NOI-6) to mitigate potential short- and long-term noise impacts. With implementation of mitigation, noise impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Policy 7.3: Limit the hours of construction and maintenance operations located adjacent to noise- sensitive land uses. Consistent. The Project would be consistent with Chapter 8.24, Noise Control, of the City’s Noise Ordinance, which requires construction activities to occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on any day except for Sunday or a Federal holiday, or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Sunday or a Federal holiday. Additionally, MM NOI-3 requires construction contractors to restrict the operation of any construction equipment that is powered by a greater than 150-horsepower-engine from operating within 15 feet of any off-site residential structure. Infrastructure Element GOAL 4.0: Ensure adequate provision of electricity, natural gas, telephone and data services and cable television. Policy 4.2: Continue to require utilities to be placed underground for new development. Consistent. The proposed Project would place underground any overhead utility lines that currently serve the Project site. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-75 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-15 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Land Use Element Urban Design Element GOAL 6.0: Encourage contextually appropriate infill development projects and property renovations. Policy 6.1: Encourage consistent high quality design of development projects, and provide development standards that ensure building and site design that is well integrated with infrastructure and circulation system Consistent. The proposed Project is Phase II of the previously City-approved Irving House development to the north. The proposed Project is consistent with the development standards identified in the amended Specific Plan for the Irving House development. Additionally, the Project would be subject to design review by the City’s Design Review Committee, which would ensure that the Project has an internally consistent, integrated design theme in terms or architectural features, landscaping, signage, and secondary functional and accessory features. Policy 6.2: Ensure that new infill development contributes positively to the quality of the surrounding corridor or neighborhood, including the potential to provide additional park space, and minimize the visibility of on-site parking. Consistent. The Project includes 19,535 square feet (sf) of homeowner’s association (HOA) common open space in addition to 22,090 sf of private yard open space for each residential unit. Guest parking spaces are internal to the development and not visible from E. Grove Avenue or North Orange Olive Road. Land Use Element The Land Use Element in the General Plan identifies the City’s objectives, goals and policies related to development and land use and includes a Land Use Policy Map that establishes allowable land uses throughout the City. The current land use designation for the Project site is Low Medium Density Residential (6-15 du/ac) (LMDR), which allows small lot or zero lot line single-family subdivisions, duplexes and mobile home parks, as well as lower intensity apartment and condominium complexes. The Project proposes a small-lot single-family subdivision at a density of 11.0 units per acre. This is allowed under the site’s LMDR land use designation and is consistent with the permitted development density range. The site is not within a Land Use Focus Area or Urban Mixed-Use Site in the City. As described above, the site is proposed as Phase II of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan Specific Plan and would require a Zone Change to allow for the zoning designation of the site to be consistent with its LMDR General Plan land use designation. Circulation and Mobility Element The Circulation and Mobility Element addresses the transportation and circulation needs of the City. The North Orange Olive Road is designated as a Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) in the Master Plan for Streets and Highways in the Circulation and Mobility Element. Along the site, North Orange Olive Road is a 4-lane, undivided road and no change to this road is proposed as part of the Project. In the Plan for Recreational Trails and Bikeways in the Circulation and Mobility Element, no existing or proposed bikeways or recreational trails are located on North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue near the site. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-76 Environmental Analysis Growth Management Element The Growth Management Element addresses the provision of traffic improvements for orderly growth and development in the City. It sets a level of service (LOS) standard of D. The Project does not include roadway and traffic improvements and would not lead to the operation of roadways and intersections at levels worse than LOS D. Natural Resources Element The Natural Resources Element promotes the conservation and preservation of open space resources; air; water and energy resources; ecological, biological and mineral resources; recreational facilities and programs; trails; and visual and aesthetic resources in the City. The site is not located in an area with identified natural resources. Public Safety Element The Public Safety Element addresses natural and human-caused hazards, crime, and homeland security, including hazards from geologic and seismic activity, floods, fire, hazardous materials, and aircraft operations. Other public safety issues addressed in the Element include inter-jurisdictional cooperation, homeland security, urban design as a crime prevention tool, and issues related to the City’s hillsides and waterways. The site is not located in an area with identified hazards or public safety concerns. Noise Element The Noise Element establishes policies and programs that will limit community exposure to excessive noise levels. Occupancy of the Project and associated residential activities would not generate excessive noise levels. Additionally, features, including but not limited to, site boundary walls and double-pane windows would reduce noise levels at the site. Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element The Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element seeks to preserve the City’s culture and history. The site is not developed with a historic object (even though one of the existing structures on the site is more than 50 years old, it is not considered historic), historic site, or significant historic resource and is not located within an existing or proposed local historic district or neighborhood conservation area. Infrastructure Element The Infrastructure Element includes guidelines and policies that address the community’s existing and future needs for public utilities and infrastructure, such as water, sewer, storm drain systems, solid waste services, natural gas, electrical, telephone, data, and cable television services. The Project would connect to existing utility infrastructure on abutting streets and would be adequately served by existing infrastructure. Urban Design Element The Urban Design Element seeks to enhance the image of the City and to provide guidance for new growth and redevelopment. Based on review of Figure UD-1, Urban Design Plan, in the Urban Design Element, the site is not located in or near a public facility, ridgeline, resource area, mixed-use area, activity node/urban green zone, city gateway, city entrance sign, major or minor streetscape, Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-77 Environmental Analysis commercial corridor, Old Towne, City Hall, or Community Center. However, the site is near an open space park – Shaffer Park. The Project would not affect the visual character of Shaffer Park. Economic Development Element The Economic Development Element seeks to cultivate economic growth and maintain a strong economic base in the City. While the Project would result in the loss of jobs at the existing shopping center, the Project would redevelop an underutilized commercial site and would create temporary construction jobs, as well as provide housing for the City’s work force. Therefore, in light of the above, there would be no conflict with the goals and policies of the General Plan or the land use designation for the site in the Land Use Policy Map. Thus, the proposed Project would not conflict with the Orange General Plan. Orange Zoning Code The Orange Zoning Code is the primary tool for implementing the General Plan. The Zoning Code provides development standards (i.e., setbacks, building height, site coverage, parking, and sign requirements) for development in all areas of the City. In addition, the Zoning Code includes a Zoning Map that identifies the zoning of individual parcels, with corresponding permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited land uses. The Project site is zoned C-1 (Limited Business), which allows for the development of various commercial, retail, service, and office uses. Per the Land Use Element, this zone is not consistent with the LMDR land use designation of the site. Thus, as part of the Project, a Zone Change is needed from C-1 to R-3 (SP), which is one of the zones that is consistent with the LMDR designation. With the Zone Change, the site zoning would be consistent with the land use designation in the General Plan, and the Project would become consistent with both the land use designation and zoning of the site. The R-3 zone would also be similar to the R-3 zone of the parcels north of the site. As indicated earlier, the Project would comply with applicable zoning regulations for the R-3 (SP) zone. With the proposed Zone Change, the Project would not conflict with any local land use plan, policy, or regulation. In light of the above analysis, the Project would not cause a significant environmental impact, as the Project would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation, including the City’s General Plan and Zoning. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-78 Environmental Analysis MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND As discussed in the Phase I Project MND, The MND identified that the Project site was not in a Mineral Resource Zone designating the presence or likely presence of aggregate mineral resources valuable to the region and was not in a Resource Area designated in the City of Orange General Plan. The MND concluded that Phase I Project development would not cause the loss of a mineral resource valuable to the City, the region, or the State, and that no impact would occur. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? The CGS designates Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs) according to the presence of or potential for underlying mineral resources. MRZ-1 is an area with no significant mineral deposits; MRZ-2 is an area with significant mineral deposits; and MRZ-3 is an area containing known mineral resources of undetermined significance. The site is located in MRZ-3 (CDMG 1995, 1981). However, there are no mining activities on or near the site. Considering the small size of the site and the presence of urban developments on and near the site, it is unlikely that mining activities would be feasible or would occur on the site. The Project site is not underlain by an oil, gas or geothermal field, although several small oil fields are present along the Santa Ana River (DOGGR 2001). There are no past or ongoing oil or gas drilling activities on or near the site. Review of the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources’ (DOGGR’s) Well Finder shows no oil or gas wells are located on the Project site or in the vicinity of the site. The nearest wells are dry holes approximately 0.34 mile to the north and 0.61 mile to the southeast of the site (DOGGR 2018). Thus, redevelopment of the site with residential uses would not result in the loss or availability of regional mineral resources. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-79 Environmental Analysis b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? The Natural Resources Element of the General Plan calls for the preservation of significant mineral resources in the City by protecting the Santiago Creek and Santa Ana River corridors. The Project site is not located near Santiago Creek or the Santa Ana River nor is it designated as Resource Area (R-A), where mining activities are ongoing. The site is also not zoned S-G (Sand and Gravel) in the City’s Zoning Map (Orange 2016a). In addition, there are no mining activities on or near the site. Thus, the Project would not result in the loss or availability of locally-important mineral resources. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-80 Environmental Analysis NOISE Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND As discussed in the Phase I Project MND, Project construction hours would be limited to 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday excepting federal holidays, when construction activities are exempt from the City’s noise standards. The MND concluded that Project construction noise impacts would be less than significant after such compliance. The MND identified construction vibration impacts to existing residences next to the Project site as less than significant after implementation of MM NOI-3. The MND identified that operational traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. The MND concluded that noise impacts from traffic on Orange-Olive Road and trains on a BNSF railroad track, both of which are adjacent to the Project site would be potentially significant. However, it was determined that with implementation of MM NOI-1 and NOI-2, impacts would be less than significant. No airport-related noise impacts were identified. Supplemental Evaluation Noise and Vibration Descriptors Several rating scales (or noise “metrics”) are used to analyze the effects of noise on a community. These scales include the equivalent noise level (Leq) and the community noise equivalent level (CNEL). Average noise levels over a period of minutes or hours are usually expressed as A-weighted decibels (dBA) Leq, which is the equivalent noise level for that period of time. The period of time averaging may be specified; where Leq(3) would be a 3-hour average. When no period is specified, a 1-hour average is assumed. Noise of short duration (i.e., substantially less than the averaging period) is averaged into ambient noise during the period of interest. Thus, a loud noise lasting several seconds or a few minutes may have minimal effect on the measured sound level averaged over a one- hour period. To evaluate community noise impacts, CNEL was developed to account for human sensitivity to evening and nighttime noise. CNEL separates a 24-hour day into three periods: daytime (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM), evening (7:00 PM to 10:00 PM), and nighttime (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). The evening sound Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-81 Environmental Analysis levels are assigned a 5-dBA penalty, and the nighttime sound levels are assigned a 10-dBA penalty prior to averaging them with daytime hourly sound levels. Several statistical descriptors are also often used to describe noise, including Lmax and Lmin, which are the highest and lowest A-weighted sound levels that occur during a noise event, respectively. Vibration amplitudes are commonly expressed in peak particle velocity (PPV) or root-mean square (RMS) vibration velocity. PPV is defined as the maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of a vibration signal. PPV and RMS vibration velocity are normally described in inches per second. Similar to airborne sound, vibration velocity can be expressed in decibel notation as vibration decibels (VdB). Existing Conditions To evaluate the existing noise environment, noise level measurements were collected at 4 locations on January 7-8, 2019. Measurements were collected for 24-hours along the western Project boundary (North Orange Olive Road) and southern Project boundary (East Grove Avenue), as well as 20-minute durations for the eastern and northern Project boundaries where noise levels are not substantial. The energy average (Leq), maximum noise level (Lmax), and minimum noise level (Lmin) values were taken at each ambient noise measurement location, as shown in Table 4-16, below. The complete noise monitoring results are included in Appendix F. TABLE 4-16 SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Measurement Numbera Location Time Noise Levels (dBA) Primary Noise Source Leq Lmax Lmin 1 Northern Project Boundary 7:33 – 7:53 pm 56 75 49 Roadway traffic and train noise 2 Eastern Project Boundary 7:08 – 7:30 pm 53 65 48 Roadway traffic and train noise dBA: A-weighted decibels; Leq: equivalent noise level; Lmax: maximum noise level; Lmin: minimum noise level. a See Exhibit 4-3 for noise measurement locations As shown in Table 4-16, the average daytime noise levels near the site range from 53 to 56 dBA Leq. Traffic from North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue are the primary noise sources in the Project area. Intermittent noise is generated by trains along the BNSF railroad tracks. Noise levels at the northern and eastern property boundaries are below the noise compatibility standards for residential uses. Noise Monitoring Locations (Exhibit 4-3) along the Project boundary lines adjacent to North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue were measured for 24-hours. Extended monitoring was conducted at these locations, as they are adjacent to noise sources. As shown in Exhibit 4-4, Hourly Noise Levels at Western Project Boundary, average daytime noise levels in the study area range from 59 to 75 dBA Leq. The 24-hour weighted noise level at this location is 75 dBA CNEL. The measured noise levels are representative of an urban environmental setting. Shaffer Park Orange Fire Station No. 3Burlington Northern Santa Fe RlwyE Meats Ave N Orange Olive RdN Cleveland StE Buckeyewood Ave E Glendale Dr E Blueridge Ave E Grove Ave N Shaffer StD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\MXD\ISMND\ex_Noise_Locations_20190612.mxd² Noise Monitoring Locations Cohen Property Exhibit 4-3 (Rev: 11-18-2019 MMD) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Noise_Locations.pdf 200 0 200100Feet Specific Plan Area Noise Monitoring Location Aerial Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe 2017 Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-82 Environmental Analysis EXHIBIT 4-4 HOURLY NOISE LEVELS AT THE WESTERN PROJECT BOUNDARY ALONG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE ROAD Exhibit 4-5, shown below, provides the 24-hour measurements conducted at the southern Project property line adjacent to East Grove Avenue. Hourly Noise Levels at Noise Monitoring along East Grove Avenue had average daytime noise levels, which range from 48 to 64 dBA Leq. The 24-hour weighted noise level at this location is 64 dBA CNEL. - 20 40 60 80 100 120 Noise Level (dBA)Minimum Leq Maximum Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-83 Environmental Analysis EXHIBIT 4-5 HOURLY NOISE LEVELS AT THE SOUTHERN PROJECT BOUNDARY ALONG EAST GROVE AVENUE Sensitive Receptors Noise-sensitive receptors are generally considered to be humans who are engaged in activities that may be subject to the stress of significant interference from noise. These would include residents within the Project site that may be sleeping, resting, or involved in other activities that are not conducive to loud noise. City of Orange Noise Element and Municipal Code The City of Orange has established guidelines and standards in the General Plan and the Municipal Code. General Plan Noise Element The City of Orange is affected by several different sources of noise, including automobile traffic, trains, commercial activity, and periodic nuisances such as construction, loud parties, and other events. The Noise Element is intended to identify these sources and provide objectives and policies that ensure that noise from these sources does not create an unacceptable noise environment (Orange 2015). The Noise Element contains guidelines for noise compatible land use for long-term operations as shown in Table 4-17. - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Noise Level (dBA)Minimum Leq Maximum Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-84 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-17 LAND USE NOISE COMPATIBILITY MATRIX Land Use CNEL (dBA) Designations (as shown on Figure LU-5) Uses Interior1,3 Exterior2 Estate Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Low Medium Density Residential Single-family, duplex, and multiple-family 45 65 Mobile home park N/A 65 Medium Density Residential Neighborhood Mixed-use Neighborhood Office Professional Old Towne Mixed-use General Commercial Yorba Commercial Overlay Urban Mixed-use Urban Office Professional Single-family 45 65 Mobile home park N/A 65 Multiple-family, mixed-use 45 654,5 Transient lodging—motels, hotels 45 65 Sports arenas, outdoor spectator sports N/A N/A Auditoriums, concert halls, amphitheaters 45 N/A Office buildings, business, commercial and professional 50 N/A Light Industrial and Industrial Manufacturing, utilities, agriculture N/A N/A Public Facilities and Institutions Schools, nursing homes, day care facilities, hospitals, convalescent facilities, dormitories 45 65 Government Facilities—offices, fire stations, community buildings 45 N/A Places of Worship, Churches 45 N/A Libraries 45 N/A Utilities N/A N/A Cemeteries N/A N/A Recreation Commercial Open Space Open Space—Park Open Space—Ridgeline Resource Area Playgrounds, neighborhood parks N/A 70 Golf courses, riding stables, water recreation, cemeteries N/A N/A Notes: (1) Interior habitable environment excludes bathrooms, closets and corridors. (2) Exterior noise level standard to be applied at outdoor activity areas; such as private yards, private patio or balcony of a multi-family residence. Where the location of an outdoor activity area is unknown or not applicable, the noise standard shall be applied inside the property line of the receiving land use. (3) Interior noise standards shall be satisfied with windows in the closed position. Mechanical ventilation shall be provided per Uniform Building Code (UBC) requirements. (4) Within the Urban Mixed-Use, Neighborhood Mixed-Use, Old Towne Mixed-use, and Medium Density Residential land use designations, exterior space standards apply only to common outdoor recreational areas. (5) Within Urban Mixed-Use and Medium Density Residential land use designations, exterior noise levels on private patios or balconies located within 250 feet of freeways (I-5, SR-57, SR-55, SR-22, or SR-241) and Smart Streets and Principal Arterials identified in the Circulation & Mobility Element that exceed 70 dB should provide additional common open space. N/A=Not Applicable to specified land use category or designation Source: City of Orange General Plan Noise Element, Table N-3, 2015. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-85 Environmental Analysis The Noise Element of the General Plan acknowledges that noise from major roadways may affect sensitive receptors and identifies roadways proximate to the Project site. The following goals and polices are applicable to the Project: GOAL 1.0: Promote a pattern of land uses compatible with current and future noise levels. Policy 1.1: Consider potential excessive noise levels when making land use planning decisions. Policy 1.2: Encourage new development projects to provide sufficient spatial buffers to separate excessive noise generating land uses and noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 1.3: Incorporate design features into residential and mixed-use projects that can be used to shield residents from excessive noise. Policy 1.4: Ensure that acceptable noise levels are maintained near noise-sensitive uses. Policy 1.5: Reduce impacts of high-noise activity centers located near residential areas. Policy 1.6: Require an acoustical study for proposed developments in areas where the existing and projected noise level exceeds or would exceed the maximum allowable levels identified in Table N-3 (shown as Table 4-17). The acoustical study shall be performed in accordance with the requirements set forth within this Noise Element. The Noise Element recognizes that noise generated by vehicular traffic can affect adjacent residential areas and other sensitive land uses. The following goals and polices are applicable to the Project: GOAL 2.0: Minimize vehicular traffic noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 2.1: Encourage noise-compatible land uses along existing and future roadways, highways, and freeways. Policy 2.2: Encourage coordinated site planning and traffic control measures that minimize traffic noise in noise-sensitive land use areas. Policy 2.3: Encourage the use of alternative transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, mass transit, and alternative fuel vehicles to minimize traffic noise. Policy 2.4: Continue to work with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA), and Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) to install, maintain, and update freeway and highway rights- of-way buffers and soundwalls. Policy 2.5: Work toward understanding and reducing traffic noise in residential neighborhoods with a focus on analyzing the effects of traffic noise exposure throughout the City. GOAL 3.0: Minimize train noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 3.1: Encourage noise-compatible land uses and incorporate noise-reducing design features within transit oriented, mixed-use development near rail corridors. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-86 Environmental Analysis The City has also established goals and policies related to construction activities based on Goal 7. GOAL 7.0: Minimize construction, maintenance vehicle, and nuisance noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 7.1: Schedule City maintenance and construction projects so that they generate noise during less sensitive hours. Policy 7.2: Require developers and contractors to employ noise minimizing techniques during construction and maintenance operations. Policy 7.3: Limit the hours of construction and maintenance operations located adjacent to noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 7.4: Encourage limitations on the hours of operations and deliveries for commercial, mixed-use, and industrial uses abutting residential zones. City of Orange Exterior Noise Standards As shown in Table 4-18, the City has developed noise limits for stationary noise sources, which apply to noise exposure at all residential properties. These standards are codified in the City of Orange Municipal Code Title 8 (Health and Safety), Chapter 8.24 (Noise Control), Section 8.24.040 (Exterior Standards). TABLE 4-18 EXTERIOR NOISE STANDARDS Noise Level Time Period Hourly Average (L eq) 55 dB (A) 7:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m. 50 dB (A) 10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m. Maximum Level 70 dB (A) 7:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m. 65 dB (A) 10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m. Source: City of Orange Municipal Code, 2018. City of Orange Significance Thresholds Transportation The Noise Element of the General Plan (Orange 2015) states the following for assessments of potential noise impacts: For City analysis of noise impacts and determining appropriate mitigation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in addition to the maximum allowable noise level standards outlined in Tables N-3 and N-4, an increase in ambient noise levels is assumed to be a significant noise impact if a project causes ambient noise levels to exceed the following: • Where the existing ambient noise level is less than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 5 dBA CNEL or greater. • Where the existing ambient noise level is greater than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 3 dBA CNEL or greater. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-87 Environmental Analysis Would the Project: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Project Related Temporary Noise Increases Temporary noise increases associated with the Project occurs during the construction phase. Chapter 8.24, Noise Control, of the Orange Municipal Code is the City’s Noise Ordinance. Section 8.24.050.E provides an exemption to the City’s noise limits provided construction activities are consistent with the following: “E. Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property, provided said activities take place between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on any day except for Sunday or a Federal holiday, or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Sunday or a Federal holiday. Noise generated outside of the hours specified are subject to the noise standards identified in Table 8.24.040.” Construction activities are anticipated to involve demolition of existing structures and pavement, grading and excavation for utilities and building foundations, and building construction. Construction activities are anticipated to start in 2019 and end in 2020. All construction activities would occur within the hours specified by the Noise Ordinance. It is estimated that a total of approximately 3,000 tons of debris would be exported off site during demolition. During the demolition and grading activities, trucks are expected to enter and leave the Project site on a regular basis during working hours. The number of truck trips traveling along the City-designated truck routes (e.g., North Orange Olive Road, Meats Avenue, Taft Avenue, and Tustin Street) would vary daily depending on the nature of the construction activity at the site. Demolition debris removal from the Project site would generate an estimated 300 round trips over a 20-day demolition phase. On average it is anticipated that 15 truck hauls per day or approximately 2 round trips per hour would occur during that phase. The addition of 2 round haul truck trips per hour would increase traffic noise levels by less than 3 dBA, which would not result in a substantial change in noise levels. Thus, this impact would be less than significant. In typical construction projects (such as the proposed Project), demolition and grading activities generate the highest noise levels since they involve the use of the largest equipment. During demolition and grading, persons in the immediate vicinity of the construction site would experience short-term noise impacts related to the operation of heavy construction equipment such as bulldozers, hoe-rams, excavators, and dump trucks. Noise levels would fluctuate depending on equipment type, duration of use, and distance between noise source and receiver. The operation of heavy equipment may occur as close as 10 feet to the residences to the north and east of the Project site. Noise from localized point sources, such as construction equipment, decreases by approximately 6 dBA with each doubling of distance from the source to receptor. Local residents would be subject to elevated noise levels due to the operation of Project-related construction equipment. Construction activities are carried out in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential phases would change the character of the noise levels surrounding the construction site as work progresses. Construction noise levels reported in the USEPA’s Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances were used to estimate future construction noise levels for the Project (USEPA 1971). Typically, the estimated construction noise levels are Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-88 Environmental Analysis governed primarily by equipment that produces the highest noise levels. Construction noise levels for each generalized construction phase (ground-clearing/demolition, excavation, foundation construction, building construction, paving, and site cleanup) are based on a typical construction equipment mix for an industrial project and do not include use of atypical, very loud, and vibration- intensive equipment (e.g., pile drivers). The degree to which noise-sensitive receptors are affected by construction activities depends heavily on their proximity. Estimated noise levels attributable to the development of the proposed Project are shown in Table 4-19, and calculations are included in Appendix F, Noise Calculations. TABLE 4-19 CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT NOISE-SENSITIVE USES Construction Phase Noise Levels (Leq dBA) Residential Uses to the North of the Project Site Industrial Uses to the West of the Project Site Shaffer Park to the South of the Project Site Residential Uses to the East of the Project Site Max (10 ft) Avg (130 ft) Max (170 ft) Avg (380 ft) Max (60 ft) Avg (190 ft) Max (10 ft) Avg (240 ft) Ground Clearing/Demolition 97 75 72 65 81 71 97 69 Excavation 102 80 77 70 86 76 102 74 Foundation Construction 95 73 70 63 79 69 95 67 Building Construction 95 73 70 63 79 69 95 67 Paving and Site Cleanup 102 80 77 70 86 76 102 74 Leq dBA: Average noise energy level; Max: maximum; avg: average; ft: feet Note: Noise levels from construction activities do not take into account attenuation provided by intervening structures. Source: USEPA 1971. Table 4-19 shows both the maximum and average noise levels for construction equipment. Maximum noise levels represent the noise levels from construction equipment occurring nearest to the noise sensitive use/receptor. Average noise levels represent the noise exposure to sensitive uses based on the distance to the center of the Project site. Noise levels from general Project-related construction activities would range from 70 to 102 dBA Leq for the maximum noise levels and 63 to 80 dBA Leq for the average noise levels. Noise level reductions from existing masonry walls were not included. The development of the proposed Project would comply with Orange Municipal Code Section 8.24.050, which establishes restrictions for construction activities. With the incorporation of the restrictions in Orange Municipal Code Section 8.24.050, MM NOI-3, previously approved mitigation measure from the Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND, and MM NOI-4, which incorporates MM 5.10-3 from the City of Orange General Plan EIR, impacts would be less than significant. Permanent Project Related Noise Increases Permanent sources of noise associated with the Project involves vehicle trips traveling to and from the Project site, property maintenance activities (landscaping) as well as mechanical sources of noise. Noise Generated by Project Traffic As discussed in Section 4.17, Transportation, the proposed Project would result in a reduction in trip generation compared to the existing commercial uses. Thus, it is presumed that Project-generated Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-89 Environmental Analysis traffic volumes on nearby streets with adjacent sensitive receptors would be less than the traffic generated by the existing onsite uses. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Noise Generated by On-Site Sources The primary noise sources generated by operation of the proposed Project would be heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment, landscape maintenance, and trash collection. Noise generated by HVAC equipment is regulated by the Municipal Code, Section 8.24.040, which requires that noise exposure at offsite uses not exceed the exterior noise standards shown in Table 8.24.040 (Table 4-18, above). For maintenance and landscaping activities, Section 8.24.050 of the Orange Municipal Code provides an exemption to the noise limits provided within 8.24.040 provided that: “Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property, provided such activities take place between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on any day except Sunday or a Federal holiday, or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Sunday or a Federal holiday. Operation of leaf blowers are regulated under OMC Chapter 8.26;” Activities associated with maintenance of property will comply with Sections 8.24.040 and 8.24.050. Noise and Land Use Compatibility California Code of Regulations The CBC establishes building standards applicable to all occupancies throughout the State. Section 1207.4 requires that “Interior to exterior noise sources shall not exceed 45 db in any habitable room. The noise metric shall be either the day-night average sound level (Ldn) or the community noise equivalent level (CNEL), consistent with the noise element of the general plan.” City of Orange Noise Element Table N-3 (Table 4-17, above) of the City’s Noise Element presents criteria used to assess the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment. As previously described, the existing noise level on the Project site is estimated at 75 dBA CNEL proximate to the western Project boundary and 64 dBA CNEL proximate to the southern Project boundary. Noise levels along the western boundary are anticipated to exceed the 65 dBA CNEL noise compatibility standard identified within Table N-3 of the City’s Noise Element (Table 4-17, above). However, Note 4 within Table 4-17 states: “Within the Urban Mixed-Use, Neighborhood Mixed-Use, Old Towne Mixed-use, and Medium Density Residential land use designations, exterior space standards apply only to common outdoor recreational areas.” Therefore, MM NOI-1 and MM NOI-2, previously approved measures from the Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND, and MM NOI-5 would be incorporated into the Project to ensure noise compatibility. MM NOI-5 requires a noise analysis demonstrating that interior noise levels would be 45 dBA CNEL or less and exterior common use areas proximate to North Orange Olive Road would be located behind the buildings or shielded by a sound wall or other barrier to provide exterior noise levels not exceeding 65 dBA CNEL. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Applicable Previously Approved Mitigation Measures MM NOI-1: The Applicant shall provide a “windows closed” condition for each proposed residential unit project. A “windows closed” condition requires a means of mechanical ventilation per Chapter 12, Section 1205 of the Uniform Building Code. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-90 Environmental Analysis This shall be achieved with a standard forced air conditioning and heating system with a filtered outside air intake vent for each residential unit, to be confirmed at the time of Building Plan check. (Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND No. 1837-14 Previously Approved Measure MM-NO-1) MM NOI-2: The Applicant shall provide windows with at least a 30 STC rating for all second floor windows in homes that are adjacent to Orange-Olive Road. These homes are labeled as 2, 3, 4, and 5 on Figure 11. (Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND No. 1837-14 Previously Approved Measure MM-NO-2) MM NOI-3: The Applicant shall require that all construction contractors restrict the operation of any construction equipment that is powered by a greater than 150 horsepower engine from operating within 15 feet of any off-site residential structure. (Orange- Olive Residential Development Project MND No. 1837-14 Previously Approved Measure MM-NO-3) New Mitigation Measures: MM NOI-4 The City shall require construction contractors to implement the following measures during construction activities through contract provisions and/or conditions of approval as appropriate: 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained per manufacturers’ specifications and fitted with the best available noise suppression devices (i.e., mufflers, silencers, wraps, etc.). 2. Shroud or shield all impact tools, and muffle or shield all intake and exhaust ports on power equipment. 3. Construction operations and related activities associated with the proposed Project shall comply with the operational hours outlined in the City of Orange following noise attenuation measures as listed from the Municipal Code Noise Ordinance or mitigate noise at sensitive land uses to below Orange Municipal Code standards. 4. Construction equipment should not be idled for extended periods of time in the vicinity of noise sensitive receptors. 5. Locate fixed and/or stationary equipment as far as possible from noise sensitive receptors (e.g., generators, compressors, rock crushers, cement mixers). Shroud or shield all impact tools, and muffle or shield all intake and exhaust ports on powered construction equipment. 6. Where feasible, temporary barriers shall be placed as close to the noise source or as close to the receptor as possible and break the line of sight between the source and receptor where modeled levels exceed applicable standards. Acoustical barriers shall be constructed material having a minimum surface weight of 2 pounds per square foot or greater, and a demonstrated Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25 or greater as defined by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method E90. Placement, orientation, size, and density of acoustical barriers shall be specified by a qualified acoustical consultant. (City of Orange General Plan EIR MM 5.10-3) Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-91 Environmental Analysis MM NOI-5 Prior to the issue of the building permit for the proposed Project, the Applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis acceptable to the City’s Community Development Director, that demonstrates that the proposed architectural design would provide an interior noise level of 45 dBA CNEL or less (based on buildout traffic noise conditions) in all habitable rooms of the proposed buildings facing North Orange Olive and East Grove Avenue. The Applicant shall also submit plans and specifications showing that: • All residential units shall be provided with a means of mechanical ventilation, as required by the California Building Code for occupancy with windows closed. • Demonstrate that the exterior noise exposure limits of 65 dBA CNEL are met for common outdoor recreational areas. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? There are no applicable City standards for structural damage from vibration. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) vibration damage potential guideline thresholds are shown in Table 4-20. TABLE 4-20 VIBRATION DAMAGE THRESHOLD CRITERIA Structure and Condition Maximum ppv (in/sec) Transient Sources Continuous/Frequent Intermittent Sources Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, ancient monuments 0.12 0.08 Fragile buildings 0.20 0.10 Historic and some old buildings 0.50 0.25 Older residential structures 0.50 0.30 New residential structures 1.00 0.50 Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.00 0.50 ppv: peak particle velocity; in/sec: inch(es) per second. Note: Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment. Source: Caltrans 2013. The nearest structures to the Project site are the residences located approximately 8 feet from the Project’s property lines to the north. Older residential buildings are located within a few feet of the eastern property line. In terms of classifications in Table 4-13, the structures to the east are conservatively considered “historic and some old buildings” for purposes of this analysis. The new residential structures to the north of the Project site are evaluated under the “New residential structures” vibration threshold. Therefore, the criterion for a significant impact for continuous/frequency intermittent sources is 0.25 ppv in/sec for the historic residential uses and 0.5 for the new residential uses. Similar to structural damage from vibration, there are no applicable Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-92 Environmental Analysis standards in the City’s Municipal Code for human annoyance from construction vibration. The Caltrans vibration annoyance potential guideline thresholds are shown in Table 4-21. Based on the guidance in Table 4-21, the “strongly perceptible” vibration level of 0.9 ppv in/sec is used in this analysis as the threshold for a potentially significant vibration impact for human annoyance. TABLE 4-21 VIBRATION ANNOYANCE CRITERIA Average Human Response ppv (in/sec) Severe 2.000 Strongly perceptible 0.900 Distinctly perceptible 0.240 Barely perceptible 0.035 ppv: peak particle velocity; in/sec: inch(es) per second. Source: Caltrans 2013. Conventional construction equipment would be used for demolition and grading activities, with no pile driving or blasting equipment. Table 4-22 summarizes typical vibration levels measured during construction activities for various vibration-inducing equipment at a distance of 25 feet. TABLE 4-22 VIBRATION LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Equipment ppv at 25 ft (in/sec) Vibratory roller 0.210 Large bulldozer 0.089 Caisson drilling 0.089 Loaded trucks 0.076 Jackhammer 0.035 Small bulldozer 0.003 ppv: peak particle velocity; ft: feet; in/sec: inches per second. Source: Caltrans 2013; Federal Transit Administration 2006. Demolition, grading, and construction would occur up to the property lines and, as noted above, off- site land uses are relatively close to the property lines. Table 4-23, Vibration Annoyance Criteria at Sensitive Uses, shows the vibration annoyance criteria from construction-generated vibration activities proposed at the Project site. Table 4-23 shows the ppv relative to uses proximate to the Project site. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-93 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-23 VIBRATION ANNOYANCE CRITERIA AT SENSITIVE USES Equipment Vibration Levels (ppv) Residential Uses to the North of the Project Site Industrial Uses to the West of the Project Site Shaffer Park to the South of the Project Site Residential Uses to the East of the Project Site (ppv @ 10 ft) (ppv @ 170 ft) (ppv @ 30 ft) (ppv @ 10 ft) Vibratory roller 0.83 0.01 0.06 0.83 Large bulldozer 0.35 0.01 0.02 0.35 Small bulldozer 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 Jackhammer 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.14 Loaded trucks 0.30 0.00 0.02 0.30 Criteria 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Exceeds Criteria? No No No No ppv: peak particle velocity; Max: maximum; avg: average; ft: feet Note: Calculations can be found in Appendix F). Source: USEPA 1971 As shown in Table 4-23, ppv would not exceed the criteria threshold when construction activities occur under maximum (i.e., closest to the receptor) exposure conditions. These vibration levels represent conditions when construction activities occur closest to receptor locations. Construction- related vibration would be substantially less under average conditions when construction activities are located further away. Because vibration levels would be below the significance thresholds, vibration generated by the Project’s construction equipment would not be expected to generate strongly perceptible levels of vibration at the nearest uses and would result in less than significant vibration impacts related to vibration annoyance. Table 4-24, Structural Damage Criteria at Sensitive Uses, shows the peak particle velocity levels (ppv) relative to structural damage to sensitive uses from vibration activities. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-94 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4-24 STRUCTURAL DAMAGE CRITERIA AT SENSITIVE USES Equipment Vibration Levels (ppv) Residential Uses to the North of the Project Site Industrial Uses to the West of the Project Site Shaffer Park to the South of the Project Site Residential Uses to the East of the Project Site (ppv @ 10 ft) (ppv @ 170 ft) (ppv @ 30 ft) (ppv @ 10 ft) Vibratory roller 0.83 0.01 0.06 0.83 Large bulldozer 0.35 0.01 0.02 0.35 Small bulldozer 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 Jackhammer 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.14 Loaded trucks 0.30 0.00 0.02 0.30 Criteria 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.25 Exceeds Criteria? Yes No No Yes ppv: peak particle velocity; Max: maximum; avg: average; ft: feet Source: USEPA 1971 (Calculations can be found in Attachment B).2 Jackhammering assumed to maintain a clearance of at least 5 feet from adjacent offsite buildings. ppv: peak particle velocity; Max: maximum; avg: average; ft: feet Note: Calculations can be found in Appendix F). Source: USEPA 1971 As shown in Table 4-24, all ppv levels would be below the structural damage threshold at adjacent off-site structures with the exception of vibratory rollers. At this point in the planning process, the types of construction equipment that would be used are unknown. MM NOI-6 would reduce vibration generated by construction equipment to levels that would avoid cosmetic structural damage to offsite buildings. As such, with implementation of mitigation measures, potential impacts associated with cosmetic structural damage would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact After Mitigation Mitigation Measures: MM NOI-6 The Applicant shall require that all construction contractors restrict the operation of the following construction equipment to beyond the following distances from off-site buildings: (1) vibratory rollers and large bulldozers – 25 feet, and (2) loaded trucks and other large equipment – 15 feet). Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The Project site is not located within 2.0 miles of an airport. There are no private airstrips in the project area or in the City. The nearest public airports are the Fullerton Municipal Airport, which is located 7.8 miles northwest of the site, and the JWA, which is located approximately 9.3 miles south of the site. The Project site is not located within the planning areas (including the Runway Protection Zones, Safety Compatibility Zones, and Airport Impact Zones) for these airports. In addition, the 60- Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-95 Environmental Analysis dBA CNEL noise contours for these airports do not extend to the site or areas near the site (OCALUC 2008, 2004). Therefore, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from airport operations. No impact related to excessive airport noise levels would occur and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-96 Environmental Analysis POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The Phase I Project MND discussed that development of the 25 residential units would add 77 residents to the City of Orange. The MND determined that the increases in residential units and residents were consistent with population growth projections for the City and with the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment, and thus would be a less than significant impact. Additionally, the MND determined that no residents or residential units were on that site and, as such the Project development would not displace residents or housing. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? The Project involves the construction of 32 dwelling units that would replace the existing shopping center on the site. Using the City’ 2018 average household size of 3.07 persons per household (DOF 2018), the Project would directly generate approximately 98 residents. This would increase the City’s 2018 resident population of 141,952 persons and its 2018 housing stock of 45,719 units (DOF 2018) by 0.07 percent to 142,050 residents and 45,751 units, respectively. Jobs at the existing businesses on the site would be lost with the Project, and the jobs that would be created during construction would be short-term and would not increase the City’s job base permanently. However, the temporary construction crew and long-term residents of the Project, coupled with the loss of jobs, goods and services at the existing shopping center, would not create a significant change in demand for goods and services that may induce business investment, growth, or development in the area. Additionally, these increases would be within anticipated growth for the City as projected by SCAG at 153,000 residents, 49,300 households, and 105,500 jobs by 2040 (SCAG 2016b). The site is currently served by existing roads and utility infrastructure, and no extension of roads or infrastructure is proposed by the Project such that would indirectly induce growth. Thus, the Project would not result in substantial unplanned population growth, directly or indirectly. The impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-97 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The Project site is currently developed with two commercial/retail buildings occupied by retail, office, alternative school, and restaurant uses. There are no existing housing and associated residents on the site that would be displaced by the development of the residential Project. The proposed Project would develop 32 dwelling units and help meet the City’s housing goals under SCAG’s RHNA, as identified in the Housing Element of the General Plan. Demolition of the existing commercial/retail buildings would not lead to the loss of existing housing. Thus, no impact related to displacement of housing and related residents would occur, and no replacement housing is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-98 Environmental Analysis PUBLIC SERVICES Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND As discussed in the MND, Phase I Project development would cause an incremental increase in demands for fire protection; such increase would not require construction of a new or expanded fire station. Thus, impacts on fire protection were identified as less than significant. The MND concluded that Project development would cause a very slight increase in demands for police protection. Such increase would not require construction of a new or expanded police station and impacts on police protection were identified as less than significant. The MND determined that Project development would add approximately 13 students to Orange Unified School District (OUSD) schools. However, the Project would pay school development impact fees authorized under Senate Bill 50 (California Government Code Sections 65995 et seq.); such fees were deemed to be “full and complete school facilities mitigation.” It was concluded that impacts to school facilities would be less than significant after payment of development impact fees. The MND determined that Project development would generate slight increases in demands for library materials and library facility space. However, the Project would pay the required City Library Facilities Development Impact Fee. Thus, it was concluded that Project impacts to libraries would be less than significant after payment of such fee. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-99 Environmental Analysis Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? Fire protection services in the City, including the Project site, are provided by the Orange Fire Department (OFD). The services include fire suppression; expanded advanced life support and medical transportation; increased responses for hazardous materials and environmental monitoring; technical rescue operations including urban search and rescue, swift water rescue, confined space and trench rescue; disaster preparedness; public education; fire prevention; and fire/arson investigation (Orange 2018c). A total of eight fire stations are located throughout the City with a total of 124 sworn firefighting personnel. OFD also works with the cities of Anaheim, Santa Ana, and Garden Grove, and the Orange County Fire Authority based on an aid agreement with the said entities. The nearest Fire Station to the site is Station No. 3, located approximately 405 feet south of the Project site at 1910 Shaffer Street. The proposed Project would result in a resident population of 98 persons, which is a nominal increase in the total number of City residents (estimated at 141,952 persons in 2018) served by OFD. The proposed Project would replace an existing shopping center, which currently generates a demand for fire protection services. Given the size of the Project and the net increase in demand for fire protection services, the incremental demand of the Project for fire protection services would not result in the need for new firefighters and other personnel, nor would it require the construction of new or the alteration of existing fire protection facilities to maintain an adequate level of fire protection service in the City. The proposed Project would be required to comply with all applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations (including the City’s Municipal Code, which adopts by reference the CBC and the California Fire Code, with amendments) regarding fire prevention and suppression measures, fire hydrants and sprinkler systems, emergency access, and other fire safety requirements (see RR PS-1). The internal drive aisles would serve as fire access lanes and have been designed to meet OFD access width and turnaround requirements in the City’s Fire Code and would be constructed in compliance with the CBC (see RR PS-1). Additionally, in accordance with Chapter 15.38 of the Orange Municipal Code, the Project Applicant would be required to pay the applicable fire protection facility fee for the Project’s demand on fire protection services and to help fund the construction, expansion, or renovation of needed fire protection facilities in the City (see RR PS-2). Although the Project’s demand for fire protection services would be nominal, compliance with pertinent regulations would further avoid the Project’s increased demand for such services. The building and site improvements plans of the Project would be subject to review and approval by the Orange Building Division and OFD, to ensure that adequate fire safety, fire alarm, emergency exit and access, fire hydrant availability, and sufficient fire flows would be provided in compliance with Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-100 Environmental Analysis applicable codes and standards. Thus, no physical impacts associated with the provision of fire protection services would occur as a result of the Project, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR GEO-1 above RR PS-1 The Project shall be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable regulations in Chapter 15.32, City of Orange Fire Code, of the Orange Municipal Code and the California Building Code (CBC), which is adopted by reference in Chapter 15.04 of the Orange Municipal Code. RR PS-2 The Project Applicant shall pay the applicable fire protection facility fee in accordance with Chapter 15.38, Fire Protection Facilities Program, of the Orange Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required ii) Police protection? Police protection services in the City, including the Project site, are provided by the Orange Police Department (OPD) from their station at 1107 N. Batavia Street, approximately 1.1 miles southwest of the Project site (Orange 2018d). The OPD consists of three divisions, including the Support Services Division, Investigative Services Division, and the Field Services Division. The City participates in a mutual aid program among all Orange County law enforcement agencies at various levels. The mutual aid agreement provides back-up assistance to member departments, as needed. The Project would generate a demand for police protection services, once the proposed dwelling units are occupied. However, the dwelling units would replace a shopping center that currently generates a demand for police protection services. Thus, the incremental demand of the Project for police protection services is not anticipated to increase OPD response times to the Project site or surrounding area. The net increase in demand for police protection services is also not anticipated to generate the need for new sworn officers, nor would it require construction of new or physically altered police protection facilities to maintain an adequate level of service to the Project site and surrounding areas. In accordance with Chapter 3.13, Police Facility Development Fee, of the Orange Municipal Code, the Project Applicant would be required to pay the applicable police facility fee for the Project’s impact on police protection services and to help fund the acquisition of land and construction of police facilities and expansion of services and infrastructure in the City (see RR PS-3). Additionally, Project plans would be reviewed and approved by the Crime Prevention Unit of the Police Department to ensure safety and crime prevention measures (for locks, frames, jambs, hinges, doors, windows, lighting, fencing, and gates) are incorporated in accordance with Chapter 15.52, Building Security Standards, of the Municipal Code (see RR PS-4). To ensure adequate services are provided and to minimize the demands on police service, security and design measures that employ Defensible Space concepts will be utilized in development and construction plans. These measures incorporate the concepts of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), which involves consideration such as placement and orientation of structures, access and visibility of common areas, placement of doors, windows, addressing and landscaping. CPTED promotes public safety, physical security and allows residents the ability to monitor activity in neighboring areas. Adherence to CPTED principles and City of Orange Building Security Ordinance No. 6-18 standards will help ensure that a less than significant impact would occur. Compliance with these City regulations would reduce Project Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-101 Environmental Analysis impacts to police protection services. Therefore, no physical impacts associated with the provision of police protection services to the proposed Project would occur, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR PS-3 The Project Applicant shall pay the applicable police facility fee in accordance with Chapter 3.13, Police Facility Development Fee, of the Orange Municipal Code. RR PS-4 The Project shall be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable regulations in Chapter 15.52, Building Security Standards, of the Orange Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required iii) Schools? The proposed Project involves the development of 32 dwelling units that would be occupied by approximately 98 residents and include school-aged children requiring school services from the Orange Unified School District (OUSD). The site is within the service boundaries of Fletcher Elementary School, Cerro Villa Middle School, and Villa Park High School (OUSD 2018a). The 2017- 2018 enrollments were 435 students at Fletcher Elementary School; 1,019 students at Cerro Villa Middle School; and 2,342 students at Villa Park High School (DOE 2018). The OUSD estimates student generation for residential uses at 0.3539 student per single-family detached unit (OUSD 2018b). The proposed 32 single-family detached dwelling units would generate 12 students (6 elementary school students, 2 middle school students, and 4 high school students). These students would make up less than 1.0 to 1.5 percent of the current enrollment at schools serving the site. The Project would pay school development fees to the OUSD for the improvement of school facilities that would be needed to serve the Project’s demand for school services and facilities (see RR PS-5). As provided under Section 17620 of the California Education Code and Section 65970 of the California Government Code, the payment of statutory school development fees would fully mitigate a project’s impacts on schools. Thus, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR PS-5 The Project Applicant shall pay the applicable school development fee to the Orange Unified School District, in accordance with Section 17620 of the California Education Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required vi) Parks? The proposed 32-unit residential development would generate a total of 98 residents, which would increase demand for and use of existing parks and recreational facilities. However, given the nominal Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-102 Environmental Analysis increase in population and payment of Park and Recreational Facilities Development Impact Fee (see RR PS-6), the potential impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Please refer to Section 4.16, Recreation, below for a detailed discussion of potential park impacts, Regulatory Requirements: RR PS-6 The Project Applicant shall dedicate parkland or pay the applicable Park and Recreational Facilities Development Impact Fee, in accordance with Chapter 16.60, Park Dedication and Fees, and Chapter 3.40, Park Facilities Fees, of the Orange Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required vi) Other public facilities? The Orange Public Library and Historic Center, El Modena Branch Library, and Taft Branch Library provide library services in the City of Orange. The nearest public library to the Project site is the Taft Branch Library (740 East Taft Avenue), located approximately 0.4 mile southeast of the Project site. This library has book and media collections for children, teens, and adults, along with book drops, wi-fi, public computers, printers, and a copy machine (Orange 2018b). The Project would generate a demand for library services that would be served by existing libraries in the City and other nearby libraries. Due to the limited number of residents from the Project (98 residents), compared to the City’s total 2018 population of 141,952 persons, the increase in library service demand is expected to be proportionately 0.07 percent of existing demand and would not result in the need for construction of new or expanded facilities. Chapter 3.50, Library Facilities Fees, of the Orange Municipal Code requires residential developments to pay library facilities fees for impacts to library services and to help fund the acquisition of land and construction of library facilities and the expansion of library services and infrastructure in the City (see RR PS-7). Payment of the necessary library fees by the Project Applicant would provide funds for the improvement of library facilities that would be utilized by Project residents. The Project Applicant and future residents would also pay for any future need for City services or facilities in accordance with the City’s adopted fee schedule. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR PS-7 The Project Applicant shall pay the applicable library facilities fee in accordance with Chapter 3.50, Library Facilities Fees, of the Orange Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-103 Environmental Analysis RECREATION Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The Phase I Project MND identified that Project development would generate a slight increase in demands for parkland, exacerbating an existing shortfall of parkland in the City. However, the Project would be required to pay a City Park and Recreational Facilities Development Impact Fee. Therefore, it was concluded that impacts on parkland and park facilities would be less than significant after payment of such fee. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The proposed 32 dwelling units would result in a population of approximately 98 residents, which would generate a demand for parks and recreational facilities. The Project proposes one on-site common open space area at the center of the site for a total of 1,563 sf. The Orange Municipal Code requires 250 sf of useable open space per dwelling unit or a total of 8,000 sf for the proposed Project. As indicated in Table 3-3 in Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project would provide 19,535 sf of HOA common open space and 22,090 sf of allowable private open space for a total of 41,625 sf of usable open space, which would exceed the City requirement by 33,625 sf. These on-site open space areas are expected to meet some of the demand for recreation facilities generated by residents of the Project. Project residents would also use nearby City parks and other public and regional parks. Shaffer Park is located south of the site across East Grove Avenue and is likely to be used by residents of the Project. This park was built in 1963 and recently completed renovations. The updated park, reopened in April 2019, and includes a tot lot, picnic shelter and tables, concession building, restrooms, community building, baseball field, open fields, exercise areas, and a parking lot. Other nearby parks and recreational facilities that may be used include Killefer Park, Belmont Park, Eisenhower Park and Lake, Olive Park, Steve Ambriz Memorial Park, and Fred Barrera Park (Orange 2018a). Due to the small number of residents that would be introduced by the Project, the increase in the use of existing public park facilities by the Project would not be at a level that would result in physical Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-104 Environmental Analysis deterioration of existing parks and other recreational facilities, nor would it require the need for new or physically altered facilities. However, since the City is not currently in compliance with the standard of three acres of improved parkland per 1,000 residents, the Project would further contribute to shortage of parkland. This potential impact would be offset by payment of fee. Chapter 16.60, Park Dedication and Fees, of the Orange Municipal Code requires residential developments to dedicate parkland or pay in-lieu fees, and Chapter 3.40, Park Facilities Fees requires residential developments to pay fees for the provision, expansion, or improvement of parks and recreational facilities in the City (see RR PS-6). Payment of the necessary park and recreational facilities development impact fees by the Project Applicant would provide funds for park acquisition, development, or improvements to offset the use of these facilities by Project residents. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR PS-6 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Policy 5.6 of the Natural Resources Element of the Orange General Plan sets a minimum of 3 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons and a goal of 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons in the City, as well as a goal of 10 acres of regional parkland per 1,000 persons in the County (Orange 2010a). The estimated 98 residents of the Project would require a minimum of 0.29 acre and a goal of 0.49 acre of parkland. The Project Applicant would pay the Park and Recreational Facilities Development Impact Fee to provide funds for park acquisition, development, or improvements to serve Project residents (see RR PS-6, above). The Project would also include an on-site common open space area (1,563 sf or 0.03 acre) that would provide recreational areas and facilities for residents of the Project. The impacts of the proposed on-site open space areas have been included in the analysis of Project impacts in this Subsequent IS/MND. Since the recreation needs of the residents would be partially met on site and through payment of the necessary park fees, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increased demand for recreational facilities, requiring the construction of new parks that would adversely affect the environment. There are also adequate regional parks and recreational facilities in that would serve the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR PS-6 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-105 Environmental Analysis TRANSPORTATION Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND The Phase I Project MND analyzed traffic conditions for with-project scenario, existing conditions plus project, on segments of three roadways: Orange-Olive Road, Meats Avenue, and Taft Avenue. Roadway segment operations were characterized in terms of Level of Service (LOS). As discussed in the Phase I Project MND, the addition of Project-generated traffic to local roadways would not cause a significant impact to the operation of any roadway segment analyzed. The MND concluded that the configuration of the intersection of the proposed Project driveway with Orange-Olive Road would not cause hazards and inadequate emergency access. No airport-related hazards were identified. The MND determined that Project implementation would not result in adverse impacts to pedestrian or bicycle facilities or public transit facilities or services. Supplemental Evaluation A Traffic Memorandum was prepared by Psomas to evaluate the change in trip generation associated with the existing shopping center compared to the proposed 32 dwelling units, and to determine if additional analysis is required pursuant to the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (Psomas 2020). Based on the City’s guidelines, a Traffic Impact Analysis is required if a project meets any of the following criteria:  When either the AM or PM peak hour trip generation is expected to exceed 100 vehicle trips from the proposed development.  Projects on the Arterial Highway System which generate 1,600 Average Daily Trips (ADT);  Projects that will add 51 or more trips during either the AM or PM peak hours to any intersection;  Any project where variations from the standards and guidelines provided in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines are being proposed. The Project would not exceed any of these criteria, as identified below; therefore, a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required. The findings of the Traffic Memorandum are incorporated in the following analyses, and the report is included as Appendix G to this Subsequent IS/MND. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-106 Environmental Analysis Trip Generation The new trips to be generated by the proposed Project were estimated using the 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual and are shown in Table 4-25. As seen in the table, the Project is expected to generate 302 trips per day, including 24 trips in the AM peak hour and 32 trips in the PM peak hour. There are multiple existing uses on site that will be replaced with the Project, including a K-8 school which serves homeless children, a casual restaurant (with dine-in and take-out services), and partially occupied retail spaces. Because the number of trips currently generated by the site is likely to be lower than what would be calculated with the ITE trip generation rates, it was assumed that the Project site is currently unoccupied. Further, this provides a conservative assumption because the proposed Project would be replacing trips instead of generating completely new trips on the site. TABLE 4-25 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ITE LU 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing Units 32 Period Trips/Unit Trips % In % Out Trips In Trips Out AM Peak 0.74 24 25% 75% 6 18 PM Peak 0.99 32 63% 37% 20 12 Daily 9.44 302 50% 50% 151 151 Source: Psomas 2020. Trip Distribution Although the proposed Project is expected to add a minimal amount of traffic to the network, the trip distribution was estimated to help visualize where traffic generated by the Project may travel. The Project site will be served by a single driveway located on Grove Avenue. The intersection of East Grove Avenue and Orange Olive Road provides access to the north and south; however, based on discussions with the City, it was assumed that all traffic intending to travel south from the Project would turn left onto East Grove Avenue, then would travel south on Shaffer Street to access the signalized intersection at Taft Avenue. This is a conservative assumption, as it is likely that some or all of the site traffic intending to travel south would make the left turn onto Orange Olive Road from East Grove Avenue. Exhibit 4-6, Trip Distribution, shows the anticipated trip distribution out of and into the Project site and the projected AM peak hour, PM peak hour, and daily trips expected to make each movement. As shown in Exhibit 4-6, most of the Project traffic is expected to use East Grove Avenue and Orange Olive Road to travel to and/or from the site. Using a conservative assumption of 40 percent of traffic exiting the site will travel along Shaffer Street results in only 7 vehicles in the peak hour along that roadway. Further, Shaffer Street between East Grove Avenue and Taft Avenue includes one stop sign for southbound traffic immediately south of East Grove Avenue and three speed humps, both of which will help deter cut-through traffic. (06/05/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Trip_Distribution.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_TripDistribution_20200605.aiSource: Psomas 2020Exhibit 4-6Cohen Property Trip Distribution Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-107 Environmental Analysis Would the Project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Short-Term Construction-Related Traffic Construction traffic is not expected to create any significant impact due to the size of the proposed Project. It is anticipated that construction traffic (particularly heavy trucks) would access the site either directly from North Orange Olive Road or via East Grove Avenue from North Orange Olive Road. No construction traffic would travel along Shaffer Street within the residential area immediately east of the Project site. To facilitate the movement of construction traffic and to minimize potential disruptions, a traffic control measures would be implemented in accordance with the City requirements and followed during construction (RR HAZ-5). With compliance with City requirements, the Project would not conflict with applicable plans, ordinance, or policy, and Project’s impact would be less than significant. Project Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that would be generated by a development. Traffic generation rates for the existing use on site and the proposed Project have been derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE’s) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. As described above, because the number of trips currently generated by the site is likely to be lower than what would be calculated with the ITE trip generation rates, it was assumed that the Project site is currently unoccupied. Further, this provides a conservative assumption because the proposed Project would be replacing trips instead of generating completely new trips on the site. Based on the Traffic Memorandum and as shown in Table 4-25, the Project is expected to generate 302 trips per day, including 24 trips in the AM peak hour and 32 trips in the PM peak hour. Project Trip Distribution As described above and shown in Exhibit 4-26, Trip Distribution, most of the Project traffic is expected to use Grove Avenue and Orange Olive Road to travel to and/or from the site. Using a conservative assumption of 40 percent of traffic exiting the site will travel along Shaffer Street results in only 7 vehicles in the peak hour along that roadway. Further, Shaffer Street between Grove Avenue and Taft Avenue includes one stop sign for southbound traffic immediately south of Grove Avenue and three speed humps, both of which will help deter cut-through traffic. Based on the above evaluation, and in light of the limited number of vehicle trips generated by the proposed Project, limited distribution of Project vehicles on Schaffer Street, the Project would not cause significant impacts at roadways and intersections near the site and in the surrounding area. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with applicable policies, plans, ordinance, or programs related to the circulation systems, nor would it affect the performance of the surrounding intersections. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. In terms of public transportation, it should be noted that OCTA buses do not run on North Orange Olive Road or East Grove Avenue near the site. The nearest bus routes are on Tustin Street, Taft Avenue, and Glassell Street. While the Project residents may utilize OCTA bus services, considering Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-108 Environmental Analysis the size of the Project and the distance of nearby bus stops, the Project is unlikely to create a major increase in bus ridership in the area. The Metrolink commuter trains (Inland Empire-Orange County Line) run along the BNSF railroad tracks west of the site across North Orange Olive Road. However, there are no train stations near the site, and the closest is the Anaheim Canyon Station, located 2.3 miles to the north, and the Orange Station, located 2.2 miles to the south. The Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center is also located 1.5 miles southwest of the site and serves OCTA buses, Amtrak and Metrolink trains, and other bus and taxi services (Metrolink 2018, Anaheim 2018). The Project would not result in any measurable increase in commuter train, bus or taxi passengers, due to the limited size of the Project. Figure CM-3, Plan for Recreational Trails and Bikeways, in the Circulation and Mobility Element of the General Plan does not show existing or proposed bikeways or recreational trails on North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue near the site. The nearest bikeways to the site are a Class III bikeway on Taft Avenue to the south and a Class II bike lane on Cambridge Street to the east. The nearest trail is along the Santa Ana River to the west (Orange 2010a). Sidewalks are present on North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue, which would be retained by the Project and would continue to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. The Project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? The CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) state that if the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) generated by a project exceed an applicable threshold of significance, it may indicate a significant impact. The guidelines also state that projects, which decrease VMT in the project area when compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant impact. Per the 2018 CEQA Statute and Guidelines, VMT is “the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts.” The City has a screening tool to determine if a project can be screened out from further VMT analysis. One of the criteria states that if the project is within a low VMT generating zone, the project would not be required to conduct further VMT analysis. In addition, a secondary criterion for projects within low VMT generating zones is that it should be confirmed that the project is consistent with the existing land use within the Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ). This Project is in a low VMT generating zone and is consistent with the TAZ, so no further VMT analysis is required (Psomas 2020). Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-109 Environmental Analysis c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? Construction of the Project would require the transport of construction equipment and building materials to and from the site, as well as the hauling of demolition and construction debris from the site. Large trucks used for these activities would have to use designated truck routes in the City, in compliance with Chapter 10.66, Truck Routes, and Chapter 10.67, Movement of Vehicles and Equipment, of the Municipal Code (RR TRA-2). Roadway hazards from these trucks and equipment would be less than significant. The on-site driveway, drive aisles, and cul-de-sacs would have to comply with City roadway standards for adequate sight distance (City Standard Plan 126) (RR TRA-3). Compliance with City standards would ensure that no traffic hazards are created by the proposed Project. City review and approval of the Major Site Plan for the proposed Project would verify compliance. The Project does not propose uses or design that would create traffic safety hazards due to a geometric design feature. Thus, it would not interfere with access, circulation, or activities at the surrounding land uses. Additionally, the Project would not introduce an incompatible use that may create a traffic hazard to surrounding residences and the park. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR HAZ-5 and RR PS-1 above RR TRA-2 All trucks used during demolition and construction and during long-term occupancy of the Project shall use designated truck routes, in compliance with Chapter 10.66, Truck Routes, and Chapter 10.67, Movement of Vehicles and Equipment, of the Orange Municipal Code. RR TRA-3 The Project shall be designed and constructed to provide adequate sight distance for drivers at all entrances and exits (driveways), drive aisles, and roadways, per City Standard Plan 126. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) Result in inadequate emergency access? During demolition and construction, construction equipment would be staged on the Project site and would not block the roadways surrounding the Project site. Construction on and obstruction of public rights-of-way associated with utility connections to existing utility infrastructure would be made in accordance with applicable City regulations, including City Standard Plans, Chapter 12.20, Street Excavation, and Chapter 12.02 of the Municipal Code (Greenbook) (see RR HAZ-5). No full road closures would occur during construction phase of the Project. Accordingly, temporary construction activities would not impede the use of surrounding roadways for emergency evacuation or access for emergency response vehicles. Adjacent streets would also be returned to their original conditions after construction activities. Impacts would be temporary and less than significant, and no mitigation is required. The Project would not include any off-site roadway and intersection improvements. Primary vehicular access to the proposed Project would be provided by an entry driveway off East Grove Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-110 Environmental Analysis Avenue and the Project would eliminate driveways off North Orange Olive Road, as well as other driveways off East Grove Avenue. Access to individual dwelling units on the site would be provided by internal drive aisles and cul-de-sacs. These would be subject to review and approval by the OFD to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles, as required under RR PS-1 in Section 4.15, Public Services. The internal circulation system for the proposed Project would be reviewed for adequacy to accommodate service and delivery trucks, trash trucks, and fire trucks by the Orange Building Division and OFD. In addition, the drive aisles and cul-de-sacs would comply with City roadway standards for adequate sight distance (see RR TRA-2). As designed, the proposed Project would provide adequate emergency access. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR HAZ-5, RR PS-1 and RR TRA-3 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-111 Environmental Analysis TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: 1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or 2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND This topic was not addressed in the 2015 MND, as it was not included in the CEQA Environmental Checklist (Appendix G). Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: 1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? The existing onsite structures were built in 1964 and in the late 1980s to early 1990s and are not considered tribal cultural resources. The existing buildings are also not listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, or the City’s local register of historical resources. The SCCIC record search did not identify any known prehistoric resources on the site. Thus, demolition of these structures would not result in a substantial adverse change to a tribal cultural resource. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-112 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required 2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. As indicated in Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, Checklist Response 4.5(a), an inquiry was made to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to request a review of the Sacred Lands File database. The NAHC completed its Sacred Lands File, and a Sacred Lands record search was conducted on December 19, 2018. A summary of the record search is provided in Checklist Response 4.5(a). The NAHC also provided a list of Native American tribes and individuals that may have knowledge of the religious and/or cultural significance of resources that may be on and/or near the Project site. Each of the groups and individuals identified by the NAHC was mailed a project notification letter on July 9, 2020, describing the project and requesting any information regarding resources that may exist on or near the project site. The letters were sent to the following groups:  Andrew Salas, Chairman, Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation  Anthony Morales, Chief, San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians  Michael Mirelez, Cultural Coordinator, Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians  Samuel Dunlap, Cultural Resources Director, Gabrielino/Tongva Nation A letter dated July 9, 2020, was received from Andrew Salas, Chairman, of the Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. The response indicates that proposed Project location is within their Ancestral Tribal Territory and therefore requests to schedule a consultation with the City to discuss the Project and the surrounding location in further detail. On July 13, 2020, Robert Garcia, Senior Planner; and on July 22, 2020, Monique Schwartz, Associate Planner sent emails to Mr. Salas to follow-up on his request for consultation. On July 22, 2020, Mr. Salas confirmed a consultation appointment on September 10, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. No further responses have been received to date. Significance Determination: To be provided upon completion of the consultation process. Mitigation Measures: To be provided upon completion of the consultation process. Significance Determination After Mitigation: To be provided upon completion of the consultation process. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-113 Environmental Analysis UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND As discussed in the Phase I Project MND, Project water demands were estimated at approximately 19.3 acre-feet per year. It was determined that the City of Orange would have water supply surpluses over demands during the 2015-2035 period. As such, Project impacts on water supplies were identified as less than significant. The Phase I Project MND estimated Project wastewater generation as approximately 13,475 gallons per day (gpd) or 0.01 million gallons per day (mgd). The MND identified the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) as responsible for wastewater treatment for much of Orange County including the Project site. As OCSD operated two wastewater treatment facilities with total capacity identified as 276 mgd and total wastewater flows of 221 mgd, the MND determined that OCSD had adequate wastewater treatment capacity for Project-generated wastewater, and that Project impacts on wastewater treatment would have been less than significant. The Phase I Project MND determined that as Project development would decrease impervious surfaces on the Project site, runoff from the site would decrease. The MND concluded that Project implementation would not involve or require construction of new or expanded storm drainage facilities, and that impacts to such facilities would be less than significant. The Phase I Project MND estimated Project solid waste generation at approximately 300 pounds per day. The MND identified that solid waste from the City of Orange was disposed of at three landfills in Orange County that had adequate remaining capacity for Project-generated solid waste. Project impacts on solid waste disposal capacity were determined to be less than significant. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-114 Environmental Analysis Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Water Water services within the City are provided by the City of Orange, Irvine Ranch Water District, Golden State Water Company, Serrano Water District, and East Orange County Water District. The Project site is located within the service area of the City of Orange and would connect to the existing water line on East Grove Avenue (refer to Exhibit 3-9, Conceptual Utility Plan). The proposed development is estimated to create a demand of 15,190 gpd of water, based on the 2015 average water consumption in the City of 155 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) (Orange 2016b). With the elimination of water demand from the existing shopping center, the net water demand is not anticipated to be significantly different, and upgrades to existing water lines would not be anticipated. Water service to the Project would also be provided in compliance Chapter 13.04 et seq. of the Orange Municipal Code, which sets regulations for service connections, water rates, and other water system provisions (see RR UTL-1). A Fire Flow Study (Appendix H) was prepared for the Project to evaluate the proposed private water system for use to meet required fire hydrant flow. Fire flow service to the Project’s proposed fire hydrants would be connected at a proposed 8-inch service off of the public main that serves a portion of East Grove Avenue. The Fire Flow Study confirmed that the private water system is capable of delivering the demand flow at more than 20 psi, wh ich is sufficiently sized to meet the flow/pressure requirements of the Orange Fire Department (DRC 2019b). Based on the analysis above and as shown in Exhibit 3-9, Conceptual Utility Plan, the existing 6-inch water pipe on East Grove Avenue would be expanded to an 8-inch pipe. The increase in pipe diameter would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities, which would cause significant environmental effects. The Project would comply with RR UTL-1. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation required. Wastewater Treatment/Storm Drainage Wastewater collection services within the City are provided by the City’s local collection system, which ties into the OCSD’s trunk lines and two reclamation/treatment plants. In 2015-2016, OCSD’s Plant No. 1 received an average of 117 mgd of wastewater and Plant No. 2 received 67 mgd (OCSD 2018a). The Project would connect to existing 10-inch sewer line on North Orange Olive Road, that serves the site and ties into larger sewer lines south and southwest of the site (Orange 2018g). The Project is estimated to generate 10,008 gpd of wastewater, based on OCSD’s wastewater generation factor of 3,451 gpd per acre for medium density residential uses (8-16 du/ac). With the elimination of water demand from the existing shopping center (estimated at 6,560 gpd, based on OCSD’s wastewater generation factor of 2,262 gpd per acre for commercial and office uses), the net increase in water demand is expected to be 3,448 gpd. Based on the City’s Master Plan of Sewer Study, the sewer line near the site in North Orange Olive Road has a design flow of 0.9127 cubic feet per second (cfs), a current flow of 0.0405 cfs, and a flow depth to diameter (d/D) ratio of 0.1029. The wastewater flow that would be contributed by the Project to this pipe estimated at 10,008 gpd, with a peaking Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-115 Environmental Analysis factor of 2.5, is equal to 0.039 cfs.5 Considering the addition in sewage flows from the recently completed 25-unit development to the north (estimated at 0.029 cfs) and the reduction in flows from demolition of the existing shopping center on the site, the increase in flows from the Project would be well below the 0.9127 design flow and would only create a minor increase in the d/D ratio. Therefore, it is anticipated that no upgrades to the existing sewer lines serving the Project site are required. Sewer service to the Project would also be in compliance with Chapter 13.56 et seq. of the Orange Municipal Code, which sets regulations for sewer mains, service charges, and wastewater discharges (see RR UTL-2). Based on correspondence from OCSD, the additional wastewater volume from the Project is within the existing wastewater treatment capacity of the treatment plants, and OCSD has sufficient capacity to meet the wastewater treatment demand of the proposed Project (OCSD 2019). Payment of the OCSD capital facilities capacity charges would also provide funds for the incremental increase in demand for wastewater treatment that would occur with the Project (see RR UTL-3). Under existing conditions, drainage on site consists of sheet flow from the buildings, drive aisles, and surface parking areas towards East Grove Avenue and through a ribbon gutter and catch basins at the northern drive aisle for discharge into North Orange Olive Road. Then it flows along the gutters on North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue toward the existing catch basin on East Grove Avenue, the storm drain line in East Grove Avenue, the culvert in North Orange Olive Road, the Buckeye/Collins Channel, and ultimately the Santa Ana River. As discussed under Response 4.10c, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Subsequent IS/MND, the Preliminary WQMP indicates that the proposed Project site would be regraded for drainage to flow to different specified catch basins and drop inlets. This captured discharge would be treated through one of two on-site modular wetlands biofiltration units before the runoff would be discharged to the storm drain line in East Grove Avenue. The proposed changes resulting from the Project would not require the construction of a new storm water drainage facility or the expansion of existing facilities that could result in significant impacts. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. The storm water runoff from the Project site would not exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system, and no infrastructure improvements would be required beyond the installation of on- site storm drain facilities. The construction of the on-site water quality BMPs and storm drain lines within the Project site has the potential for temporary construction-related impacts. Since utility installations are within the construction impact limits identified for the proposed Project, the potential impacts associated with the construction of storm drain lines have been addressed in the respective sections of this Subsequent IS/MND. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Electricity Southern California Edison (SCE) currently provides electricity to the City of Orange, including the Project Site (SCE 2019). The Project’s projected electricity usage is shown in Table 4-9, Energy Use During Operations. The Project would result in a decrease in electricity usage compared to the existing land use (shopping center). Electrical service to the Project site would be provided in accordance with SCE’s policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission. Therefore, a significant impact related to the need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations related to electricity would not occur. Additionally, the property Developer will coordinate with SCE to ensure avoidance of any notable service disruptions during the extension 5 Based on the methodology used in the sewer study for Phase I of the Orange-Olive Specific Plan Residential Development Project, immediately adjacent to the north and already constructed. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-116 Environmental Analysis of, relocation of, upgrade of, or connection to services. Impacts are considered less than significant, and mitigation is not required. Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) currently provides natural gas service to the City of Orange, including the Project Site (SCGC 2019). The Project’s projected natural gas usage is shown in Table 4-9, Energy Use During Operations. The Project would result in an increased demand for natural gas usage compared to the existing land use (shopping center). However, the service would be provided in accordance with SCGC’s policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission. Therefore, a significant impact related to the need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations related to natural gas would not occur. Additionally, the property Developer will coordinate with SCGC to ensure avoidance of any notable service disruptions during the extension of, relocation of, upgrade of, or connection to services. Impacts are considered less than significant, and mitigation is not required. Telecommunications AT&T currently provides telecommunications service to the City of Orange, including the Project Site (AT&T 2019). The service would be provided in accordance with AT&T’s policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission. Therefore, a significant impact related to the need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations related to telecommunications would not occur. Additionally, the property Developer will coordinate with AT&T to ensure avoidance of any notable service disruptions during the extension of, relocation of, upgrade of, or connection to services. Impacts are considered less than significant, and mitigation is not required. The Project would not require the construction or expansion of water or wastewater infrastructure and treatment facilities, storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR UTL-1 Water service to the Project, including application for water service, service connections, water rates, fire service, and water mains, shall be constructed and provided in accordance with Chapter 13.04 et seq., Water System, of the Orange Municipal Code. RR UTL-2 Sewer service to the Project, including sewer mains, sanitation and sewage charges, fats, oils and grease regulations, shall be constructed and provided in accordance with Chapter 13.56 et seq., Sewer System, of the Orange Municipal Code. RR UTL-3 The Project Applicant shall pay the applicable capital facilities capacity charges to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), in accordance with Article 7 of the OCSD’s Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-117 Environmental Analysis b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple years? As identified in City’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the City’s water system consists of 15 groundwater wells, 8 connections to imported water supplies, 16 reservoirs with over 40 million gallons of capacity, 16 pumping stations, and 450 miles of pipelines. In 2015, the City’s potable water supply consisted of 28,643 acre-feet (af) of water. Groundwater makes up 70 percent of the City’s water supply and comes from 15 wells in the Orange County Groundwater Basin. Imported water includes Colorado River water and State Water Project (SWP), which makes up 26 percent of the City’s supply. Surface water purchased from the Serrano Water District makes up 4 percent of the City’s supply (Orange 2016b). Using the City’s 2015 average water consumption of 155 gpcd, the Project’s 98 residents would create a demand for 15,190 gpd of water or 17 af per year. This demand is less than 0.1 percent of the City’s total 2015 water supply (28,643 af) and projected 2020 (28,000 af) and 2040 (29,500 af) water supplies (Orange 2016b). With the elimination of water demand from the existing shopping center, the net water demand would be less than 15,190 gpd. The City’s 2015 UWMP serves as a long-range planning document for water supply and demand within City’s service area. The UWMP identifies the water supplies needed to meet future demand and includes current and planned conservation measures to reduce water demand. It takes into consideration projected growth in the City and availability of future water supplies. As discussed in the 2015 UWMP, the City is capable of meeting future water demands during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years between 2015 and 2040 (Orange 2016b). The Project would comply with Sections 4.303 and 4.304 of the CALGreen Code (as adopted by the City), which require indoor and outdoor water conservation measures such as low flush toilets, aerators on sinks and showerheads, other water-efficient appliances, and water-efficient automatic irrigation system controllers. The Project would also be required to comply with Chapter 7.02, Water Conservation and Water Supply Shortage, of the Orange Municipal Code, related to prohibitions on water waste and measures under various water conservation stages and other programs for reducing water use. Compliance with these regulations and programs is provided as RR UTL-4. The increase in water demand generated by the proposed Project would be minimal; would be served by the City with minor impacts on current water supplies; and is within the projected growth and increased water demand within City’s service area. With compliance with the City’s water conservation measures, the proposed Project would not significantly impact the City’s domestic water supply. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR UTL-4 The Project shall be designed and constructed with water-efficient fixtures and systems, as required by the CALGreen Code, which has been adopted by reference into Chapter 15.17, California Green Building Code, of the Orange Municipal Code. In addition, the Project shall comply with the water conservation measures in Chapter 7.02, Water Conservation and Water Supply Shortage, of the Municipal Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-118 Environmental Analysis c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? As estimated above, the proposed Project would generate approximately 10,008 gpd of wastewater, while the existing shopping center’s wastewater generation is estimated at 6,560 gpd. The net increase in wastewater volume from the proposed Project would be approximately 3,448 gpd (or 0.003 mgd). As discussed above, the OCSD has indicated that it has sufficient capacity to meet the wastewater treatment demand of the proposed Project (OCSD 2019). Wastewater service to the Project would be in compliance Chapter 13.56 et seq. of the Orange Municipal Code, which sets regulations for service connections, sewage charges, and wastewater discharge regulations (see RR UTL-2). The Project would also pay OCSD capital facilities capacity charges to fund wastewater treatment that would be needed by the Project (see RR UTL-3). The Project would not exceed the capacities of OCSD’s wastewater treatment facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR UTL-2 and RR UTL-3 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? The Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill, Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, and Prima Deshecha Landfill are owned and operated by Orange County (OC) Waste & Recycling (County of Orange). The Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill accepts a maximum of 8,000 tons per day (tpd). As of November 2014, it had a remaining capacity of 148.8 million cubic yards. Closure of this landfill is anticipated in 2021. The Bowerman Landfill accepts a maximum of 11,500 tpd. As of February 2008, it had a remaining capacity of 266 million cubic yards. Closure of this landfill is anticipated in 2053 (CalRecycle 2018a, 2018c). The proposed Project involves demolition of the existing structures and paved surfaces on the Project site, which would generate debris to be hauled off site. In accordance with Section 4.408 of the CALGreen Code, at least 65 percent of demolition and construction debris would need to be diverted from landfills by recycling, reuse, and/or salvage (see RR UTL-5). Solid waste generation during demolition and construction activities for the proposed Project would be short-term and could be accommodated within the remaining capacities of the landfills owned and operation by OC Waste & Recycling (Arnau 2018). Solid waste collection services in the City are provided by CR&R, which would provide automated three cart system weekly service to the Project, with wastes brought to their transfer and material recovery facilities in Stanton and San Juan Capistrano (CR&R 2018). The City of Orange implements 44 waste diversion programs, including residential curbside, residential drop-off, residential buy- back, residential curbside green waste collection, public education program, and special collection events (CalRecycle 2016d). The residents of the Project are expected to participate in these programs. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-119 Environmental Analysis OC Waste & Recycling has indicated that the Project would be served by the Olinda Alpha Landfill located at 1942 North Valencia Avenue in Brea (Arnau 2018). According to California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the City of Orange had disposal rates of 6.0 pounds per resident per day (CalRecycle 2018b). Using this rate, the proposed Project’s estimated 98 residents would generate approximately 588 pounds of solid wastes per day (or 107.3 tons per year).6 This solid waste volume (0.29 ton or 25.9 cubic yards per day) would be considered a negligible amount of the daily capacity (8,000 and 11,500 tpd) of the Olinda Alpha Landfill and Frank R. Bowerman Landfill and their remaining capacities (148.8 and 266 million cubic yards). The existing shopping center currently generates solid wastes that would be eliminated with the proposed Project. OC Waste & Recycling has also indicated that the Orange County landfill system has sufficient capacity to accommodate the solid wastes generated by the proposed Project on a project-specific and cumulative basis (Arnau 2018). No significant impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: RR UTL-5 The Project contractor shall recycle, reuse, and/or salvage at least 65 percent of demolition and construction debris, in accordance with Section 4.408 of the CALGreen Code. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? State, County, and local agencies with regulatory authority related to solid waste disposal include CalRecycle, OC Waste & Recycling, and the City of Orange. Regulations specifically applicable to the proposed Project include the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (Assembly Bill [AB] 939), California Solid Waste Re-use and Recycling Access Act, AB 341, Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling (AB1826), and the CALGreen Code, as adopted by the City. AB 939, which requires every County and City in the State to prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) to its Solid Waste Management Plan, identifies how each jurisdiction will meet the State’s mandatory waste diversion goal of 50 percent by and after the year 2000. According to CalRecycle, the City of Orange has disposal rate targets of 10.1 pounds per resident per day and 14.4 pounds per employee per day. In 2017, the City’s actual disposal rates were 6.0 pounds per resident per day and 7.1 pounds per employee per day (CalRecycle 2018b). Thus, in compliance with AB 939, the City of Orange is consistently diverting more than 50 percent of its waste stream since 2007. The California Solid Waste Re-use and Recycling Access Act of 1991 (California Public Resources Code, Sections 42900–42911) directs the California Integrated Waste Management Board (now CalRecycle) to draft a “model ordinance” for the disposal of construction waste associated with development projects. Section 4.408 of the CALGreen Code, as adopted by the City by reference, requires preparation of a construction waste management plan that outlines ways in which the contractor would recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous 6 Assuming 8.88 cubic yards per ton, the Project would generate 952.8 cubic yards of wastes per year. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-120 Environmental Analysis construction and demolition debris. During the demolition and construction phase, the proposed Project would comply with the CALGreen Code through the recycling and reuse of at least 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris from the Project (see RR UTL-5). On October 6, 2011, the California Governor signed AB 341, establishing a State policy goal that no less than 75 percent of solid waste generated be source reduced, recycled, or composted by 2020. The bill also mandates local jurisdictions to implement commercial recycling by July 1, 2012 for businesses and public entities generating four cubic yards of trash or more and multi-family residential dwellings with five or more units. Solid waste storage and collection at the Project would comply with Chapter 8.28, Garbage, of the Municipal Code. The proposed residences would have regular waste collection services; be provided with recycling bins for residential solid waste, recyclables, and organics recycling to promote residential recycling; and be encouraged to participate in the City’s solid waste diversion programs. As discussed in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this Subsequent IS/MND, hazardous wastes generated during demolition and construction activities would be disposed of in accordance with existing regulations (including RR HAZ-3 and RR HAZ-4 for the handling of ACM wastes and RR HAZ-2 for the handling of LBP). Similarly, hazardous material use during construction and occupancy of the proposed Project, including maintenance activities, would be conducted in compliance with applicable regulations. No conflict with statutes and regulations related to solid waste would occur, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Requirements: See RR HAZ-2 through RR HAZ-4 and RR UTL-5 above Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-121 Environmental Analysis WILDFIRE If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND This topic as a stand-alone section was not included in the 2015 MND, based on the CEQA Environmental Checklist (Appendix G). A summary of wildfire is provided in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Supplemental Evaluation If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The proposed Project is not within a designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) as defined by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CalFire). As stated in Checklist Response 4.9.f, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the City of Orange has an emergency plan, termed an “Emergency Operations Plan,” prepared in accordance with the State Office of Emergency Services guidelines for multi-hazard functional planning (Orange 2010a). However, the Project site is not in the vicinity of any emergency evacuation corridors, and North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue are not designated evacuation corridors in the Public Safety Element of the Orange General Plan. Temporary lane closures on adjacent streets (North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue) may be required during the short-term construction period in order to connect the proposed Project to the existing utility infrastructure within these roadways. However, Project construction would not involve full closure of any public roadway during construction. Implementation of traffic control measures during construction in accordance with the City of Orange Department of Public Works Standard Plans & Specifications (City Standard Plans) and Chapter 12.02, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, of the Municipal Code, which adopts the Greenbook by reference (see RR HAZ-5), would reduce the potential for traffic hazards and the obstruction of access to adjacent parcels. Additionally, because Checklist Response thresholds 4.20a through 4.20d apply only to those projects that are “located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-122 Environmental Analysis hazard severity zones”, no impacts related to these thresholds would occur, and no mitigation is required. In the long-term, the Project would provide an access driveway off East Grove Avenue that would be used for emergency response to the site and for emergency evacuation of the site. The Project would not affect emergency response or emergency evacuation of adjacent land uses. Additionally, as indicated above, North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Avenue are not designated evacuation corridors in the Public Safety Element of the Orange General Plan. Additionally, because Checklist Response thresholds 4.20a through 4.20d apply only to those projects that are “located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones”, no impacts related to these thresholds would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? As indicated in Checklist Response IX.g, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the Project site is located in a highly urbanized area of the City, and there are no large, undeveloped areas and/or steep slopes on or near the site that may pose wildfire hazards. The site and the surrounding areas are not located in designated VHFHSZ, as identified by the CalFire. Rather, the site is within a Non-VHFHSZ area, with the nearest VHFHSZ located approximately 2.1 miles northeast of the site (CalFire 2011). Additionally, based on review of Figure PS-1, Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Map in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, the Project site is not located within designated Wildland Very High Fire Hazard Areas or Wildland High Fire Hazard Areas (Orange 2010a). Therefore, the Project is not expected to exacerbate wildfire risks and create pollutants associated with wildfire or uncontrolled spread of wildfire. Additionally, because Checklist Response thresholds 4.20a through 4.20d apply only to those projects that are “located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones”, no impacts related to these thresholds would occur. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? As previously described, the proposed Project is not within a designated VHFHSZ as defined by CalFire. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, the site is located in a highly urbanized area and surrounded by developed land on all sides. While Project construction would result in temporary lane closures, it would not involve full closure of any public roadway during construction. Implementation of traffic control measures during construction in accordance with the City of Orange Department of Public Works Standard Plans & Specifications (City Standard Plans) and Chapter 12.02, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, of the Municipal Code, which Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-123 Environmental Analysis adopts the Greenbook by reference (see RR HAZ-5), would reduce the potential for traffic hazards and the obstruction of access to adjacent parcels. All proposed structures would be constructed to meet current building and fire codes. Implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. Additionally, because Checklist Response thresholds 4.20a through 4.20d apply only to those projects that are “located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones”, no impacts related to these thresholds would occur. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? As previously described, the proposed Project is not within a designated VHFHSZ as defined by CalFire. The Project is located in a highly urbanized area that is located in a generally flat topographical area away from downslope or landslide areas. Proposed drainage changes are described in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. Specifically, implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-124 Environmental Analysis MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (‘Cumulatively considerable’ means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? August 2015 Orange-Olive Residential Development Project MND Because the Phase I Project MND site was an infill development project occupied by a vehicle storage facility at the time of preparation of the Phase I MND, it was determined that the site was not populated or used by any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status, and did not contain habitat that would support sensitive species. It was also determined that there were no historical resources located within Phase I MND site. However, the Phase I MND identified two mitigation measures in the event unknown resources were discovered during ground disturbing activities. With implementation of mitigation measures, impacts to cultural and paleontological resources were less than significant. All potential Phase I Project MND impacts were identified and mitigation measures were identified, where applicable, to reduce all potential impacts to less than significant. In addition, cumulative impacts were determined to be less than significant. Supplemental Evaluation Would the Project: a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-125 Environmental Analysis animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? There are no sensitive biological resources, habitats, or species on the Project site that would be affected by the Project. As indicated in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, of this Subsequent IS/MND, given the current developed condition and the existing trees and shrubs on the site, migratory birds may nest on the vegetation on-site. However, MM BIO-1 would avoid impacts to active bird nests during construction of the Project. Impacts on migratory birds would be less than significant after mitigation. There are no historic resources on the Project site that would be impacted by the proposed Project. Additionally, implementation of MM CULT-1 would prevent or reduce impacts on buried archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources that may be uncovered during grading and excavation activities. Implementation of MM GEO-2 would also mitigate impacts on paleontological resources. With implementation of these mitigation measures, the Project’s potential impacts on cultural resources and tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. Therefore, the Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts would be less than significant after mitigation. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Mitigation Measures: MM BIO-1, MM CULT-1, and MM GEO-2 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (‘Cumulatively considerable’ means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? As identified in the preceding analyses, all Project-level impacts have been determined to be less than significant with or without compliance with regulatory requirements or mitigated to a level considered less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measures. While the Project would contribute to potential environmental effects related to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise, these impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, since mitigation measures would be implemented to avoid or reduce potential impacts associated with these environmental issues. As discussed in Section 4.3, Air Quality, and Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this Subsequent IS/MND, the Project’s air quality and GHG impacts would be less than significant and its impacts would not be considered cumulatively considerable. The residential development to the north is expected to be fully occupied by the time the proposed Project is planned to begin construction in 2019. Similarly, the renovations at Shaffer Park were completed and the Park reopened in April 2019. Since the construction of these adjacent projects would not overlap with the Project, the construction-related impacts of the Project (e.g., pollutant emissions, GHG emissions, demolition and construction noise and debris, construction traffic and roadway encroachments) would not lead to cumulative impacts on the same sensitive receptors and intersections in the area. Review of the City’s pending land use applications shows that no new development or redevelopment is planned adjacent to the site and projects proposed within a mile of the site include office projects Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx4-126 Environmental Analysis and an industrial remodel west and southwest of the site (west of the BNSF railroad tracks); an assisted living facility and a market to the northeast, and two single-family homes to the southeast (Orange 2018j). These development projects would be subject to environmental review by the City, pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, to determine if they would lead to cumulative environmental effects as part of the appropriate CEQA analysis for each project. Since the proposed Project would not have significant impacts after mitigation, the impacts of the Project are not expected to result in cumulatively considerable impacts when added to the impacts of other projects planned or proposed in the vicinity of the site. Cumulative impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Not applicable, as no mitigation is required c) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Based on the environmental analyses above, with compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and/or the implementation of mitigation measures, the Project would have less than significant impacts on humans, as it relates to the following environmental issue areas: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. The proposed Project’s impacts on the following issue areas would be significant and would require the implementation of mitigation measures: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise. All impacts would be avoided or reduced to less than significant levels after mitigation. Therefore, with implementation as identified below, the proposed Project would not result in environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, with the implementation of mitigation measures. All impacts would be less than significant after mitigation. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Mitigation Measures: MM BIO-1, MM CULT-1, MM GEO-1, MM GEO-2, MM NOI-1 through MM NOI-6 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-1 References Anaheim, City of. 2018 (December 19, access date). ARTIC (Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center). Anaheim, CA: the City. http://www.anaheim.net/3329/ARTIC Arnau, J. 2018 (December 10). Email between J. Arnau (OC Waste & Recycling) and J. Alido (Psomas) entitled “RE: Solid Waste Disposal Services for North Orange Olive Residential Project”. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF). 2017. Network Map, BNSF Railway. Fort Worth, TX: BNSF. https://www.bnsf.com/ship-with-bnsf/maps-and-shipping-locations/pdf/carload_map.pdf California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2019a (February 11, 2019, page last reviewed). Air Quality Data Statistics. https://arb.ca.gov/adam ———. 2019b. Air Quality Standards and Area Designations. Sacramento, CA: CARB. https://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/desig.htm. ———. 2017. OffRoad 2017 Orion Database. https://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/ordiesel.htm ———. 2014. Emission Factor Model (EMFAC 2014). Web database: https://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2014/ ———. 2009 (June). Written Idling Policy Guidelines. Sacramento, CA: CARB. https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/ordiesel/guidance/writtenidlingguide.pdf. ———. 2008 (December). Climate Change Scoping Plan. Sacramento, CA: CARB. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/adopted_scoping_plan.pdf. ———. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Sacramento, CA: CARB. https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/landuse.htm California Building Standards Commission (CBSC). 2019 (February, access date). Welcome to the California Building Standards Commission. Sacramento, CA: CBSC. http://www.bsc.ca.gov/. California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey (CGS). 2018a (December 4, access date). CGS Information Waterhouse: Mineral Land Classification. Sacramento, CA: CGS. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc ———. 2018b (December 11, access date). Orange County Tsunami Inundation Maps. Sacramento, CA: CGS. https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Pages/Tsunami/Maps/Orange.aspx ———. 1998 (April 15). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Orange Quadrangle. Sacramento, CA: CGS. http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Maps/ORANGE_EZRIM.pdf California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG). 1995 (December 21). OFR 94-15: Update of Mineral Land Classification of Portland Cement Concrete Aggregate in Ventura, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties, California, Part III – Orange County. Sacramento, CA: CDMG. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/ofr/OFR_94-15/OFR_94-15_Text.pdf Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-2 References ———. 1981. Special Report 143, Mineral Land Classification of the Greater Los Angeles Area. Sacramento, CA: CDMG. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/sr/SR_143/PartIII/SR_143_partIII_Text.pdf California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). 2018 (December 4, access date). Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Well Finder. Sacramento, CA: DOGGR. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#close. ———. 2001. Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Fields in California, 2001. Sacramento, CA: DOGGR. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/maps/Map_S-1.pdf California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). 2018 (September). Orange County Important Farmland 2016. Sacramento, CA: FMMP. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2016/ora16.pdf. California Department of Conservation, Williamson Act Program (WAP). 2012 (August 3). Agricultural Preserves 2004, Williamson Act Parcels, Orange County, California. Sacramento, CA: WAP. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/Orange_WA_03_04.pdf California Department of Education (DOE). 2018 (December 12, access date). 2017-18 Enrollment by Ethnicity and Grade. Sacramento, CA: DOE. https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/dqcensus/EnrEthGrd.aspx?cds=30666213038098&agglev el=school&year=2017-18 California Department of Finance (DOF). 2018 (May 1). E-5 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, January 2011-2018, with 2010 Benchmark. Sacramento, CA: DOF. http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-5/ California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2018a (December 5, access date). NCCP Plan Summary – County of Orange (Central/Coastal) NCCP/HCP. Sacramento, CA: CDFW. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP/Plans/Orange-Coastal ———. 2018b (December 5, access date). NCCP Plan Summary – Orange County Transportation Authority NCCP/HCP. Sacramento, CA: CDFW. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP/Plans/OCTA California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire). 2011 (October). Orange County – Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. Sacramento, CA: CalFire. http://frap.fire.ca.gov/webdata/maps/orange/fhszl_map.30.pdf California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2018a (December 10, access date). SWIS Facility Detail, Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary LF (30-AB-0360). Sacramento, CA: CalRecycle. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/30-AB-0360/. ———. 2018b (December 10, access date). Jurisdiction Diversion/Disposal Rate Summary (2007– Current) (Jurisdiction: Orange). Sacramento, CA: CalRecycle. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DiversionProgram/JurisdictionDiversionPost2 006. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-3 References ———. 2018c (December 10, access date). SWIS Facility Detail, Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill (30- AB-0035). Sacramento, CA: CalRecycle. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/30-AB-0035/ ———. 2018d (December 14, access date). Jurisdiction Waste Diversion Program Summary, 2017, Orange. Sacramento, CA: CalRecycle. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/%20DiversionProgram/JurisdictionSummary/ 349/Year/2017 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2018 (December 11, access date). Envirostor - Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese). Sacramento, CA: DTSC. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE&sit e_type=CSITES,OPEN,FUDS,CLOSE&status=ACT,BKLG,COM,COLUR&reporttitle=HAZARDOU S+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST+(CORTESE) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2018a (December 10, access date). 2017 Traffic Volumes. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans. http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/census/volumes2017/Route51-59.html ———. 2013 (September) Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/TCVGM_Sep13_FINAL.pdf. ———. 2011 (September 7). California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2018a (December 11, access date). Groundwater Levels for Station 338167N1178415W001. Sacramento, CA: DWR. http://wdl.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary/groundwater/hydrographs/brr_hydro.cfm?CFG RIDKEY=3592 ———. 2018b (December 11, access date). Inundation Maps. Sacramento, CA: DWR. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/All-Programs/Division-of-Safety-of-Dams/Inundation- Maps California Energy Commission. 2018. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Sacramento, CA: CEC. https://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Build ing_Standards_FAQ.pdf California State Legislature. 2006. Assembly Bill 32. California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_0001- 0050/ab_32_bill_20060927_chaptered.pdf Ceres Corporation (Ceres). 2015 (August 20). Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, Commercial Property 301 through 349 East Grove Avenue and 1997 North Orange Olive Road, Orange, California. La Mesa, CA: Ceres. CR&R, Incorporated. (2018 (December 13, access date). City of Orange. Stanton, CA: http://crrwasteservices.com/cities/california/county-of-orange/city-of-orange/ Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-4 References Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor (DOI). 2017 (December 22). The Migratory Bird Treaty Act Does Not Prohibit Incidental Take. Washington, D.C.: DOI. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/m-37050.pdf. DRC Engineering, Inc. (DRC). 2019a (May 3, Revised November 20). Priority Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Cohen Property, 305 Grove Ave., Orange, CA 92865. Anaheim, CA: DRC. ———. 2019b (February 6). Fire Flow Study for Orange-Olive Ave and Grove Ave, 305 Grove. Anaheim , CA: DRC. Environmental Data Resources (EDR). 2018 (December 11). The EDR Radius Map Report – North Orange Olive Road Residential. Shelton, CT: EDR. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2009 (December 3). Flood Insurance Rate Map, Orange County, California and Incorporated Areas – Map Number 06059C0153J. Washington, D.C.: FEMA. International Code Council (ICC). 2016 (July). 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, Part 11. Washington, D.C.: ICC. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/document/657?site_type=public Jefferson, G.T. 1991. Catalogue of late quaternary vertebrates from California. Techn. rep./Natural history museum of Los Angeles County. Metrolink. 2018 (May 14). Metrolink Commuter Rail System. Los Angeles, CA: Metrolink. https://www.metrolinktrains.com/globalassets/about/system-map.pdf Miller, W.E. 1971. Pleistocene Vertebrates of the Los Angeles Basin and Vicinity (exclusive of Rancho La Brea). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science, Number 10, 1-121. Morton, D.M., F.K. Miller, P.M. Cossette, and K.R. Bovard. 2006. Geologic Map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30ʹ X 60ʹ Quadrangles, California. US Geological Survey. Municode Corporation (Municode). 2018 (September 5). Orange - Municipal Code. Tallahassee, FL: Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/orange/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=ORANGEMUC O. NEOMAP. 2018. Neogene Mammal Mapping Portal. http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/neomap/. Orange, City of. 2019 (September 11, access date). Eichlers. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/1790/Eichlers ———. 2018a (December 4, access date). Find a Facility. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/Facilities?clear=False ———. 2018b (December 5, access date). Taft Branch Library. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/1349/Taft-Branch Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-5 References ———. 2018c (December 11, access date). Fire. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/150/Fire ———. 2018d (December 11, access date). Police. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/592/Police ———. 2018e (July 1). City of Orange Development Fees. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/3519/Orange-Development-Fees ———. 2018f (December 12, access date). Orange Historical Aerial Photo Viewer. Orange, CA: the City. http://cityoforange.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=7aabe710725e4cf aa0006c9acd2f7177 ———. 2018g (December 12, access date). Engineering Documents – Sewer. Orange, CA: the City. http://cityoforange.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=d1c6e895e3bd4a 4d937b51356308776b ———. 2018h (December 12, access date). Engineering Documents – Storm Drain. Orange, CA: the City. http://cityoforange.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=d1c6e895e3bd4a 4d937b51356308776b ———. 2018i (December 12, access date). City of Orange Historic Preservation (view historically significant properties). Orange, CA: the City. http://cityoforange.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=61cfb52ef62c4bf 18b658adf826878d4 ———. 2018j (December 13). Pending Land Use Applications as of December 13, 2018. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/8184/Pending-Land-Use- App-12-13-2018 ———. 2016a (March 16). City of Orange Zoning Map. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/626/Citywide-Zoning-Map- PDF?bidId=. ———. 2016b (June). 2015 Urban Water Management Plan - Final. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/Archive/ViewFile/Item/171 ———. 2015a. City of Orange Natural Resources Element of the General Plan. Revised 12-8-15. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/571/General-Plan---Natural-Resources- PDF———. 2015b. City of Orange Noise Element of the General Plan. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/572/General-Plan---Noise-PDF ———. 2012. City of Orange Manual of Grading. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/732/2012-Grading-Manual-PDF ———. 2010a (March 9, as amended). General Plan. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/391/General-Plan Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-6 References ———. 2010b (March). Program Environmental Impact Report Orange General Plan (prepared by EDAW, Inc.). Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/391/General-Plan ———. 2007 (August 15). City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/2552/TIA- Guidelines_Signed?bidId= ———. 2006 (April 11). City of Orange Local CEQA Guidelines. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/531/Local-CEQA-Guidelines- PDF?bidId= ———. 2004 (March 25). Intersection Sight Distance, Standard Plan No. 126. Orange, CA: the City. https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/776/Standard-Plan-126- Intersection-Sight-Distance-PDF Orange, County of. 2012. General Plan, Chapter IX. Safety Element. Santa Ana, CA: the County. http://www.ocpublicworks.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=8599 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (OCALUC). 2008 (April 17). Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Costa Mesa, CA: OCALUC. http://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/docs/JWA_AELUP-April-17-2008.pdf. ———. 2004 (November 18). Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Fullerton Municipal Airport. Costa Mesa, CA: OCALUC. https://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/docs/FMA_AELUP- November-18-2004.pdf Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). 2019 (February 6). Email between U. Murthy (Orange County Sanitation District) and J. Cho (Psomas) entitled “EXTERNAL: Wastewater Plant Design Capacity”. ———. 2018a (December 10, access date). Regional Sewer Service, Facts and Key Statistics. Fountain Valley, CA: OCSD. https://www.ocsd.com/services/regional-sewer-service ———. 2016 (February 24). Ordinance No. OCSD-48. Fountain Valley, CA: OCSD. https://www.ocsd.com/home/showdocument?id=18538 Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). 2017 (October). 2017 Orange County Congestion Management Program. Orange, CA: OCTA. http://www.octa.net/pdf/2017%20Final%20CMP.pdf Orange Unified School District (OUSD). 2018a (December 11, access date). School Locator. Orange, CA: OUSD. http://apps.schoolsitelocator.com/?districtcode=57964 ———. 2018b (February 2). Orange Unified School District Residential Development School Fee Justification Study. Orange, CA: OUSD. https://www.orangeusd.org/uploaded/District/Departments/Facilities_Planning/Develop erFees/School_Fee_Justification_Study_-_Residential_2-2-18.pdf Paleobiology Database (PaleoBioDB). 2018. The Paleobiology Database. https://paleobiodb.org/#/. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-7 References Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). 2018 (December 11, access date). National Pipeline Mapping System, Public Viewer. Washington, D.C.: PHMSA. https://pvnpms.phmsa.dot.gov/PublicViewer/ Psomas. 2020 (June 5). Cohen Property, City of Orange, Traffic Memorandum. Santa Ana, CA: Psomas. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 2016 (February). Santa Ana Region Basin Plan. Riverside, CA: RWQCB. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/ Schoellhamer, J.E., D.M. Kinney, R.F. Yerkes, and J.G. Vedder. 1954. Geologic map of the northern Santa Ana Mountains, Orange and Riverside Counties, California (No. 154). Schoellhamer, J.E., J.G. Vedder, R.F. Yerkes, and D.M. Kinney. 1981. Geology of the northern Santa Ana Mountains, California. Professional Paper 420- D. US Geological Survey. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2019 (February 4, access date) South Coast Air Quality Management District Facility Information Detail (FIND) Detailed Map Search. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www3.aqmd.gov/webappl/OI.Web/OI.aspx?jurisdictionID=AQMD.gov&shareID=b2 2fce4d-66d1-4519-9b48-a882636af08f ———.2016 (accessed June 2). Air Quality Management Plan. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air- quality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan ———. 2015a. (April). Draft Final Report, Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin, MATES-IV. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air- quality-studies/health-studies/mates-iv. ———. 2015b (March). SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. ———. 2013. California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod)TM Version 2013.2 Developed by Environ International Corporation in Collaboration with SCAQMD and other California Air Districts. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. ———. 2009 (October). Mass Rate Localized Significance Thresholds Look-up Tables. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized- significance-thresholds/appendix-c-mass-rate-lst-look-up-tables.pdf?sfvrsn=2. ———. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Thresholds. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance- thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf ———. 1993 (November). CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2016a. Final 2016 RTP/SCS. Los Angeles, CA: SCAG. http://scagrtpscs.net/Pages/FINAL2016RTPSCS.aspx. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-8 References ———. 2016b. Final 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Appendix, Demographics and Growth Forecast. Los Angeles, CA: SCAG. http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS_DemographicsGrowthForecast .pdf. ———. 2012 (August 29). 5th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment Final Allocation Plan, 1/1/2014 – 10/1/2021. Los Angeles, CA: SCAG. http://scag.ca.gov/Documents/5thCyclePFinalRHNAplan.pdf State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2018 (April 11). Impaired Water Bodies, 2014/2016 Integrated Report Approval Documents. Sacramento, CA: SWRCB. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/tmdl/integrated2014_2016.sht ml?wbid=CAR8011100020011107125249. ———. 2016 (April 14, date accessed). Adopted Text of Emergency Regulation (Article 22.5 Drought Emergency Water Conservation). Sacramento, CA: SWRCB. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/conservation_portal/docs/emerg ency_reg/final_reg_enacted.pdf. Southern California Edison (SCE). 2019 (January 30 access date). Incorporated Cities and Counties Served by SCE. Rosemead, CA: Southern California Edison. https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/inline- files/Incorporated_Cities_and_Counties_and_Unicorporated_Areas_Served_by_SCE_2.pdf Southern California Gas Company (SCGC). 2019 (January 30 access date). Los Angeles, CA: Southern California Gas Company. List of Cities and Communities Served. https://www.socalgas.com/regulatory/tariffs/tm2/pdf/CITIES.pdf. Twining Consulting (Twining). 2019 (January 7). Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report for Proposed North Orange Olive Development. Irvine, CA: Twining. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1971. Noise from Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/9101NN3I.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EP A&Index=Prior+to+1976&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestri ct=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp= 0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIn.dex%20Data%5C70thru75% 5CTxt%5C00000024%5C9101NN3I.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&Sort Method=h%7C- &MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i42 5&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Res ults%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018a (December 6, access date). Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species. Washington, D.C.: USFWS. https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe098 93cf75b8dbfb77 ———. 2018b (December 6, access date). National Wetlands Inventory. Washington, D.C.: USFWS. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper.html Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx 5-9 References ———. 2006 (October). Habitat Conservation Plan Documents, Orange County Southern Subregion HCP. Washington, D.C.: USFWS. https://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/HCPs/SoOrangeCoSubRegionHCP.html U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 2018 (December 4 access date). National Forest Locator. Washington, D.C.: USFS. https://www.fs.fed.us/ivm/ U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2018 (December 4 access date). The National Map. Washington, D.C.: USGS. https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/advanced-viewer/ U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and California Geological Survey (CGS). 2006. Quaternary Fault and Fold Database for the United States. http//earthquakes.usgs.gov/regional/qfaults/. Cohen Property Revised Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Environmental Document\Subsequent MND\July 2020\Cohen Property_Revised IS-MND-072720.docx5-10 References This page intentionally left blank TECHNICAL APPENDICES APPENDIX A ORANGE-OLIVE SPECIFIC PLAN (REVISED JULY 2020) Forthcoming APPENDIX B AIR QUALITY, ENERGY AND GHG MODELING DATA AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Project Characteristics - Land Use - Based on Traffic Data and site aerial estimates Construction Phase - No Construction (Existing Uses) Vehicle Trips - Off-road Equipment - No Construction (Existing Uses) Trips and VMT - No Construction (Existing Uses) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Elementary School 10.22 1000sqft 0.23 10,220.00 0 Parking Lot 69.43 1000sqft 1.59 69,430.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)1.31 1000sqft 0.03 1,315.00 0 Regional Shopping Center 23.82 1000sqft 0.55 23,815.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) North Orange Olive Existing Uses Orange County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 1 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.64 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.75 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.75 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.13 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.06 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.05 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.04 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.04 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.05 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.03 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.03 tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 2 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,310.00 1,315.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 23,820.00 23,815.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 140.18 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 116.70 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 22.31 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 15.43 5.58 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 112.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 3 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 4 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 5 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Energy 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 Mobile 2.0443 9.1995 22.1066 0.0635 5.9793 0.0808 6.0601 1.6319 0.0760 1.7079 6,574.379 2 6,574.379 2 0.6511 6,590.657 2 Total 2.8799 9.3365 22.2324 0.0643 5.9793 0.0912 6.0705 1.6319 0.0865 1.7184 6,738.669 8 6,738.669 8 0.6543 3.0100e- 003 6,755.925 6 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Energy 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 Mobile 2.0443 9.1995 22.1066 0.0635 5.9793 0.0808 6.0601 1.6319 0.0760 1.7079 6,574.379 2 6,574.379 2 0.6511 6,590.657 2 Total 2.8799 9.3365 22.2324 0.0643 5.9793 0.0912 6.0705 1.6319 0.0865 1.7184 6,738.669 8 6,738.669 8 0.6543 3.0100e- 003 6,755.925 6 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 6 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/5/2019 1/4/2019 5 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 1.59 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 7 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 8 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 9 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.0443 9.1995 22.1066 0.0635 5.9793 0.0808 6.0601 1.6319 0.0760 1.7079 6,574.379 2 6,574.379 2 0.6511 6,590.657 2 Unmitigated 2.0443 9.1995 22.1066 0.0635 5.9793 0.0808 6.0601 1.6319 0.0760 1.7079 6,574.379 2 6,574.379 2 0.6511 6,590.657 2 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Elementary School 57.03 0.00 0.00 140,385 140,385 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)147.44 183.64 152.88 209,042 209,042 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 899.21 1,052.37 531.42 1,878,528 1,878,528 Total 1,103.67 1,236.00 684.30 2,227,955 2,227,955 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 10 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Elementary School 16.60 8.40 6.90 65.00 30.00 5.00 63 25 12 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Elementary School 0.641114 0.064111 0.128223 0.053426 0.053426 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.000000 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.747966 0.042741 0.064111 0.032056 0.042741 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 Parking Lot 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 Regional Shopping Center 0.747966 0.042741 0.064111 0.032056 0.042741 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 11 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Elementary School 331.52 3.5800e- 003 0.0325 0.0273 2.0000e- 004 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 39.0024 39.0024 7.5000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 39.2341 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 934.262 0.0101 0.0916 0.0769 5.5000e- 004 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 109.9132 109.9132 2.1100e- 003 2.0200e- 003 110.5664 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 130.493 1.4100e- 003 0.0128 0.0108 8.0000e- 005 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 15.3521 15.3521 2.9000e- 004 2.8000e- 004 15.4434 Total 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.3000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0200e- 003 165.2439 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 12 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Elementary School 0.33152 3.5800e- 003 0.0325 0.0273 2.0000e- 004 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 39.0024 39.0024 7.5000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 39.2341 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.934262 0.0101 0.0916 0.0769 5.5000e- 004 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 109.9132 109.9132 2.1100e- 003 2.0200e- 003 110.5664 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.130493 1.4100e- 003 0.0128 0.0108 8.0000e- 005 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 15.3521 15.3521 2.9000e- 004 2.8000e- 004 15.4434 Total 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.3000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0200e- 003 165.2439 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 13 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Unmitigated 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0951 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.7245 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Total 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 14 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0951 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.7245 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Total 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 15 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:43 AMPage 16 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Based on Traffic Data and site aerial estimates Construction Phase - No Construction (Existing Uses) Vehicle Trips - Off-road Equipment - No Construction (Existing Uses) Trips and VMT - No Construction (Existing Uses) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Elementary School 10.22 1000sqft 0.23 10,220.00 0 Parking Lot 69.43 1000sqft 1.59 69,430.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)1.31 1000sqft 0.03 1,315.00 0 Regional Shopping Center 23.82 1000sqft 0.55 23,815.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) North Orange Olive Existing Uses Orange County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 1 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.64 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.75 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.75 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.13 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.06 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.05 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.04 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.04 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.05 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.03 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.03 tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 2 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,310.00 1,315.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 23,820.00 23,815.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 140.18 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 116.70 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 22.31 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 15.43 5.58 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 112.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 3 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 4 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 5 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Energy 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 Mobile 2.0585 8.9540 22.4533 0.0663 5.9793 0.0802 6.0595 1.6319 0.0755 1.7074 6,853.070 6 6,853.070 6 0.6506 6,869.336 5 Total 2.8942 9.0910 22.5791 0.0671 5.9793 0.0907 6.0699 1.6319 0.0859 1.7178 7,017.361 2 7,017.361 2 0.6539 3.0100e- 003 7,034.604 9 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Energy 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 Mobile 2.0585 8.9540 22.4533 0.0663 5.9793 0.0802 6.0595 1.6319 0.0755 1.7074 6,853.070 6 6,853.070 6 0.6506 6,869.336 5 Total 2.8942 9.0910 22.5791 0.0671 5.9793 0.0907 6.0699 1.6319 0.0859 1.7178 7,017.361 2 7,017.361 2 0.6539 3.0100e- 003 7,034.604 9 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 6 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/5/2019 1/4/2019 5 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 1.59 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 7 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 8 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 9 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.0585 8.9540 22.4533 0.0663 5.9793 0.0802 6.0595 1.6319 0.0755 1.7074 6,853.070 6 6,853.070 6 0.6506 6,869.336 5 Unmitigated 2.0585 8.9540 22.4533 0.0663 5.9793 0.0802 6.0595 1.6319 0.0755 1.7074 6,853.070 6 6,853.070 6 0.6506 6,869.336 5 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Elementary School 57.03 0.00 0.00 140,385 140,385 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)147.44 183.64 152.88 209,042 209,042 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 899.21 1,052.37 531.42 1,878,528 1,878,528 Total 1,103.67 1,236.00 684.30 2,227,955 2,227,955 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 10 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Elementary School 16.60 8.40 6.90 65.00 30.00 5.00 63 25 12 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Elementary School 0.641114 0.064111 0.128223 0.053426 0.053426 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.000000 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.747966 0.042741 0.064111 0.032056 0.042741 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 Parking Lot 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 Regional Shopping Center 0.747966 0.042741 0.064111 0.032056 0.042741 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 11 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.2000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0100e- 003 165.2439 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Elementary School 331.52 3.5800e- 003 0.0325 0.0273 2.0000e- 004 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 39.0024 39.0024 7.5000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 39.2341 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 934.262 0.0101 0.0916 0.0769 5.5000e- 004 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 109.9132 109.9132 2.1100e- 003 2.0200e- 003 110.5664 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 130.493 1.4100e- 003 0.0128 0.0108 8.0000e- 005 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 15.3521 15.3521 2.9000e- 004 2.8000e- 004 15.4434 Total 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.3000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0200e- 003 165.2439 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 12 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Elementary School 0.33152 3.5800e- 003 0.0325 0.0273 2.0000e- 004 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 39.0024 39.0024 7.5000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 39.2341 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.934262 0.0101 0.0916 0.0769 5.5000e- 004 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 6.9600e- 003 109.9132 109.9132 2.1100e- 003 2.0200e- 003 110.5664 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.130493 1.4100e- 003 0.0128 0.0108 8.0000e- 005 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 15.3521 15.3521 2.9000e- 004 2.8000e- 004 15.4434 Total 0.0151 0.1369 0.1150 8.3000e- 004 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 164.2677 164.2677 3.1500e- 003 3.0200e- 003 165.2439 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 13 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Unmitigated 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0951 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.7245 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Total 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 14 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0951 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.7245 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Total 0.8206 1.0000e- 004 0.0108 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0229 0.0229 6.0000e- 005 0.0245 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 15 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 10:55 AMPage 16 of 16 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Based on Traffic Data and site aerial estimates Construction Phase - No Construction (Existing Uses) Vehicle Trips - Off-road Equipment - No Construction (Existing Uses) Trips and VMT - No Construction (Existing Uses) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Elementary School 10.22 1000sqft 0.23 10,220.00 0 Parking Lot 69.43 1000sqft 1.59 69,430.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)1.31 1000sqft 0.03 1,315.00 0 Regional Shopping Center 23.82 1000sqft 0.55 23,815.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) North Orange Olive Existing Uses Orange County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 1 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.64 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.75 tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.75 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.13 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.06 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.05 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.04 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.04 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7970e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8300e-003 5.1610e-003 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.05 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.03 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.03 tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 2 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 tblFleetMix MH 1.0410e-003 1.1120e-003 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6370e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8300e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.6330e-003 0.01 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,310.00 1,315.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 23,820.00 23,815.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 140.18 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 116.70 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 22.31 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 15.43 5.58 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 112.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 3 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 4 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.1497 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 Energy 2.7500e- 003 0.0250 0.0210 1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 156.8284 156.8284 5.8700e- 003 1.6100e- 003 157.4538 Mobile 0.2949 1.3946 3.3170 9.5700e- 003 0.8753 0.0120 0.8873 0.2393 0.0113 0.2506 0.0000 898.2617 898.2617 0.0878 0.0000 900.4567 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.9392 0.0000 10.9392 0.6465 0.0000 27.1014 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.7799 16.8147 17.5947 0.0808 2.0400e- 003 20.2211 Total 0.4474 1.4196 3.3393 9.7200e- 003 0.8753 0.0139 0.8892 0.2393 0.0132 0.2525 11.7191 1,071.907 4 1,083.626 5 0.8210 3.6500e- 003 1,105.235 8 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Highest CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 5 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.1497 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 Energy 2.7500e- 003 0.0250 0.0210 1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 156.8284 156.8284 5.8700e- 003 1.6100e- 003 157.4538 Mobile 0.2949 1.3946 3.3170 9.5700e- 003 0.8753 0.0120 0.8873 0.2393 0.0113 0.2506 0.0000 898.2617 898.2617 0.0878 0.0000 900.4567 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.9392 0.0000 10.9392 0.6465 0.0000 27.1014 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.7799 16.8147 17.5947 0.0808 2.0400e- 003 20.2211 Total 0.4474 1.4196 3.3393 9.7200e- 003 0.8753 0.0139 0.8892 0.2393 0.0132 0.2525 11.7191 1,071.907 4 1,083.626 5 0.8210 3.6500e- 003 1,105.235 8 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/5/2019 1/4/2019 5 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 6 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 1.59 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 7 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 8 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 9 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.2949 1.3946 3.3170 9.5700e- 003 0.8753 0.0120 0.8873 0.2393 0.0113 0.2506 0.0000 898.2617 898.2617 0.0878 0.0000 900.4567 Unmitigated 0.2949 1.3946 3.3170 9.5700e- 003 0.8753 0.0120 0.8873 0.2393 0.0113 0.2506 0.0000 898.2617 898.2617 0.0878 0.0000 900.4567 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Elementary School 57.03 0.00 0.00 140,385 140,385 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)147.44 183.64 152.88 209,042 209,042 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 899.21 1,052.37 531.42 1,878,528 1,878,528 Total 1,103.67 1,236.00 684.30 2,227,955 2,227,955 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 10 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Elementary School 16.60 8.40 6.90 65.00 30.00 5.00 63 25 12 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Elementary School 0.641114 0.064111 0.128223 0.053426 0.053426 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.000000 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.747966 0.042741 0.064111 0.032056 0.042741 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 Parking Lot 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 Regional Shopping Center 0.747966 0.042741 0.064111 0.032056 0.042741 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.010685 0.005161 0.010685 0.001112 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 11 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 129.6321 129.6321 5.3500e- 003 1.1100e- 003 130.0958 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 129.6321 129.6321 5.3500e- 003 1.1100e- 003 130.0958 NaturalGas Mitigated 2.7500e- 003 0.0250 0.0210 1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 27.1964 27.1964 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.3580 NaturalGas Unmitigated 2.7500e- 003 0.0250 0.0210 1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 27.1964 27.1964 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.3580 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Elementary School 121005 6.5000e- 004 5.9300e- 003 4.9800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 6.4573 6.4573 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.4957 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 341006 1.8400e- 003 0.0167 0.0140 1.0000e- 004 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 18.1974 18.1974 3.5000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 18.3055 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 47630 2.6000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 1.9600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5417 2.5417 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 2.5568 Total 2.7500e- 003 0.0250 0.0210 1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 27.1964 27.1964 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.3580 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 12 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Elementary School 121005 6.5000e- 004 5.9300e- 003 4.9800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 6.4573 6.4573 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.4957 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 341006 1.8400e- 003 0.0167 0.0140 1.0000e- 004 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 18.1974 18.1974 3.5000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 18.3055 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 47630 2.6000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 1.9600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5417 2.5417 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 2.5568 Total 2.7500e- 003 0.0250 0.0210 1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 27.1964 27.1964 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.3580 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 13 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Elementary School 62137.6 19.7984 8.2000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 19.8692 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 47971.2 15.2847 6.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 15.3393 Parking Lot 24300.5 7.7427 3.2000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.7704 Regional Shopping Center 272444 86.8064 3.5800e- 003 7.4000e- 004 87.1169 Total 129.6321 5.3500e- 003 1.1100e- 003 130.0958 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 14 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Elementary School 62137.6 19.7984 8.2000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 19.8692 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 47971.2 15.2847 6.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 15.3393 Parking Lot 24300.5 7.7427 3.2000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.7704 Regional Shopping Center 272444 86.8064 3.5800e- 003 7.4000e- 004 87.1169 Total 129.6321 5.3500e- 003 1.1100e- 003 130.0958 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 15 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.1497 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 Unmitigated 0.1497 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 Total 0.1497 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 16 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 Total 0.1497 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 003 2.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.7800e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 17 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 17.5947 0.0808 2.0400e- 003 20.2211 Unmitigated 17.5947 0.0808 2.0400e- 003 20.2211 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Elementary School 0.296348 / 0.762039 4.0210 9.8200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 4.3444 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.397629 / 0.0253806 1.8657 0.0130 3.2000e- 004 2.2870 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 1.76441 / 1.08141 11.7080 0.0580 1.4500e- 003 13.5897 Total 17.5947 0.0808 2.0300e- 003 20.2211 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 18 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Elementary School 0.296348 / 0.762039 4.0210 9.8200e- 003 2.6000e- 004 4.3444 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.397629 / 0.0253806 1.8657 0.0130 3.2000e- 004 2.2870 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 1.76441 / 1.08141 11.7080 0.0580 1.4500e- 003 13.5897 Total 17.5947 0.0808 2.0300e- 003 20.2211 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 19 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 10.9392 0.6465 0.0000 27.1014 Unmitigated 10.9392 0.6465 0.0000 27.1014 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Elementary School 13.29 2.6978 0.1594 0.0000 6.6836 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 15.59 3.1646 0.1870 0.0000 7.8402 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 25.01 5.0768 0.3000 0.0000 12.5776 Total 10.9392 0.6465 0.0000 27.1014 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 20 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Elementary School 13.29 2.6978 0.1594 0.0000 6.6836 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 15.59 3.1646 0.1870 0.0000 7.8402 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 25.01 5.0768 0.3000 0.0000 12.5776 Total 10.9392 0.6465 0.0000 27.1014 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 21 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 11:09 AMPage 22 of 22 North Orange Olive Existing Uses - Orange County, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 32.00 Dwelling Unit 2.90 62,864.00 92 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project Orange County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 1 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - . Construction Phase - Defaults Trips and VMT - Default Demolition - All buildings and asphalt demolition Vehicle Trips - per Traffic Data Woodstoves - No Woodstoves per SCAQMD Rule 445 Energy Use - Default Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - . Energy Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 2 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.60 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.68 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.10 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.05 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7950e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8670e-003 5.2470e-003 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.05 tblFleetMix MH 1.0020e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6770e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8600e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5860e-003 0.01 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 57,600.00 62,864.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.39 2.90 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.91 9.82 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.62 8.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.52 9.44 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 3 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 2.6256 27.1733 16.4408 0.0368 6.6641 1.3045 7.7378 3.3971 1.2192 4.3849 0.0000 3,761.209 2 3,761.209 2 0.7698 0.0000 3,779.751 2 2020 39.5865 17.7780 15.3506 0.0270 0.1677 0.9507 1.1040 0.0445 0.9113 0.9524 0.0000 2,492.022 1 2,492.022 1 0.5452 0.0000 2,503.879 1 Maximum 39.5865 27.1733 16.4408 0.0368 6.6641 1.3045 7.7378 3.3971 1.2192 4.3849 0.0000 3,761.209 2 3,761.209 2 0.7698 0.0000 3,779.751 2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 2.6256 27.1733 16.4408 0.0368 2.6672 1.3045 3.7409 1.3430 1.2192 2.3308 0.0000 3,761.209 2 3,761.209 2 0.7698 0.0000 3,779.751 2 2020 39.5865 17.7780 15.3506 0.0270 0.1677 0.9507 1.1040 0.0445 0.9113 0.9524 0.0000 2,492.022 1 2,492.022 1 0.5452 0.0000 2,503.879 1 Maximum 39.5865 27.1733 16.4408 0.0368 2.6672 1.3045 3.7409 1.3430 1.2192 2.3308 0.0000 3,761.209 2 3,761.209 2 0.7698 0.0000 3,779.751 2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.50 0.00 45.20 59.69 0.00 38.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 4 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Energy 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Mobile 0.5675 2.8028 7.2865 0.0239 2.3511 0.0273 2.3785 0.6407 0.0257 0.6663 2,471.980 0 2,471.980 0 0.2269 2,477.652 0 Total 2.0779 3.4931 10.2160 0.0282 2.3511 0.0952 2.4464 0.6407 0.0936 0.7342 0.0000 3,318.892 2 3,318.892 2 0.2477 0.0154 3,329.684 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Energy 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Mobile 0.5675 2.8028 7.2865 0.0239 2.3511 0.0273 2.3785 0.6407 0.0257 0.6663 2,471.980 0 2,471.980 0 0.2269 2,477.652 0 Total 2.0779 3.4931 10.2160 0.0282 2.3511 0.0952 2.4464 0.6407 0.0936 0.7342 0.0000 3,318.892 2 3,318.892 2 0.2477 0.0154 3,329.684 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 5 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2019 3/28/2019 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/29/2019 4/2/2019 5 3 3 Grading Grading 4/3/2019 4/10/2019 5 6 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/11/2019 2/12/2020 5 220 5 Paving Paving 2/13/2020 2/26/2020 5 10 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/27/2020 3/11/2020 5 10 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 127,300; Residential Outdoor: 42,433; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 6 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 7 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.2141 0.0000 3.2141 0.4867 0.0000 0.4867 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 3.2141 1.2863 4.5004 0.4867 1.2017 1.6884 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 297.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 12.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 8 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1267 4.4596 1.1171 0.0114 0.2586 0.0173 0.2759 0.0708 0.0165 0.0873 1,261.938 8 1,261.938 8 0.1372 1,265.367 8 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0604 0.0386 0.4294 1.3900e- 003 0.1453 9.7000e- 004 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 004 0.0394 138.5506 138.5506 3.4100e- 003 138.6359 Total 0.1871 4.4982 1.5465 0.0127 0.4039 0.0183 0.4221 0.1093 0.0174 0.1268 1,400.489 4 1,400.489 4 0.1406 1,404.003 7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.2535 0.0000 1.2535 0.1898 0.0000 0.1898 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2535 1.2863 2.5398 0.1898 1.2017 1.3915 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 9 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1267 4.4596 1.1171 0.0114 0.2586 0.0173 0.2759 0.0708 0.0165 0.0873 1,261.938 8 1,261.938 8 0.1372 1,265.367 8 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0604 0.0386 0.4294 1.3900e- 003 0.1453 9.7000e- 004 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 004 0.0394 138.5506 138.5506 3.4100e- 003 138.6359 Total 0.1871 4.4982 1.5465 0.0127 0.4039 0.0183 0.4221 0.1093 0.0174 0.1268 1,400.489 4 1,400.489 4 0.1406 1,404.003 7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 0.8537 0.8537 0.7854 0.7854 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Total 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 1.5908 0.8537 2.4445 0.1718 0.7854 0.9572 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 10 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0372 0.0238 0.2642 8.6000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 85.2619 85.2619 2.1000e- 003 85.3144 Total 0.0372 0.0238 0.2642 8.6000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 85.2619 85.2619 2.1000e- 003 85.3144 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.6204 0.0000 0.6204 0.0670 0.0000 0.0670 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 0.8537 0.8537 0.7854 0.7854 0.0000 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Total 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 0.6204 0.8537 1.4741 0.0670 0.7854 0.8524 0.0000 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 11 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0372 0.0238 0.2642 8.6000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 85.2619 85.2619 2.1000e- 003 85.3144 Total 0.0372 0.0238 0.2642 8.6000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 85.2619 85.2619 2.1000e- 003 85.3144 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 1.0730 1.0730 0.9871 0.9871 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Total 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 6.5523 1.0730 7.6253 3.3675 0.9871 4.3546 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 12 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.5554 0.0000 2.5554 1.3133 0.0000 1.3133 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 1.0730 1.0730 0.9871 0.9871 0.0000 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Total 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 2.5554 1.0730 3.6284 1.3133 0.9871 2.3005 0.0000 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 13 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Total 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 14 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0117 0.3408 0.0988 7.4000e- 004 0.0192 2.3400e- 003 0.0215 5.5200e- 003 2.2400e- 003 7.7600e- 003 79.9065 79.9065 7.2800e- 003 80.0885 Worker 0.0558 0.0356 0.3963 1.2800e- 003 0.1341 9.0000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.3000e- 004 0.0364 127.8928 127.8928 3.1500e- 003 127.9716 Total 0.0675 0.3764 0.4952 2.0200e- 003 0.1533 3.2400e- 003 0.1565 0.0411 3.0700e- 003 0.0442 207.7994 207.7994 0.0104 208.0601 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 0.0000 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Total 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 0.0000 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 15 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0117 0.3408 0.0988 7.4000e- 004 0.0192 2.3400e- 003 0.0215 5.5200e- 003 2.2400e- 003 7.7600e- 003 79.9065 79.9065 7.2800e- 003 80.0885 Worker 0.0558 0.0356 0.3963 1.2800e- 003 0.1341 9.0000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.3000e- 004 0.0364 127.8928 127.8928 3.1500e- 003 127.9716 Total 0.0675 0.3764 0.4952 2.0200e- 003 0.1533 3.2400e- 003 0.1565 0.0411 3.0700e- 003 0.0442 207.7994 207.7994 0.0104 208.0601 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Total 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 16 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0100 0.3124 0.0904 7.3000e- 004 0.0192 1.6600e- 003 0.0208 5.5200e- 003 1.5900e- 003 7.1000e- 003 79.3398 79.3398 6.9100e- 003 79.5126 Worker 0.0521 0.0319 0.3630 1.2400e- 003 0.1341 8.9000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.2000e- 004 0.0364 123.7945 123.7945 2.8200e- 003 123.8652 Total 0.0621 0.3444 0.4535 1.9700e- 003 0.1533 2.5500e- 003 0.1559 0.0411 2.4100e- 003 0.0435 203.1344 203.1344 9.7300e- 003 203.3777 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 0.0000 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Total 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 0.0000 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 17 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0100 0.3124 0.0904 7.3000e- 004 0.0192 1.6600e- 003 0.0208 5.5200e- 003 1.5900e- 003 7.1000e- 003 79.3398 79.3398 6.9100e- 003 79.5126 Worker 0.0521 0.0319 0.3630 1.2400e- 003 0.1341 8.9000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.2000e- 004 0.0364 123.7945 123.7945 2.8200e- 003 123.8652 Total 0.0621 0.3444 0.4535 1.9700e- 003 0.1533 2.5500e- 003 0.1559 0.0411 2.4100e- 003 0.0435 203.1344 203.1344 9.7300e- 003 203.3777 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 18 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 154.7432 154.7432 3.5300e- 003 154.8314 Total 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 154.7432 154.7432 3.5300e- 003 154.8314 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 0.0000 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 0.0000 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 19 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 154.7432 154.7432 3.5300e- 003 154.8314 Total 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 154.7432 154.7432 3.5300e- 003 154.8314 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 39.3356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 39.5778 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 20 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.6900e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0605 2.1000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 20.6324 20.6324 4.7000e- 004 20.6442 Total 8.6900e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0605 2.1000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 20.6324 20.6324 4.7000e- 004 20.6442 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 39.3356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 39.5778 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 21 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.6900e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0605 2.1000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 20.6324 20.6324 4.7000e- 004 20.6442 Total 8.6900e- 003 5.3200e- 003 0.0605 2.1000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 20.6324 20.6324 4.7000e- 004 20.6442 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 22 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.5675 2.8028 7.2865 0.0239 2.3511 0.0273 2.3785 0.6407 0.0257 0.6663 2,471.980 0 2,471.980 0 0.2269 2,477.652 0 Unmitigated 0.5675 2.8028 7.2865 0.0239 2.3511 0.0273 2.3785 0.6407 0.0257 0.6663 2,471.980 0 2,471.980 0 0.2269 2,477.652 0 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 302.08 314.24 273.60 1,024,286 1,024,286 Total 302.08 314.24 273.60 1,024,286 1,024,286 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.682057 0.050367 0.104932 0.052466 0.052466 0.010493 0.010493 0.010493 0.000000 0.010493 0.005247 0.010493 0.000000 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 23 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 2262.35 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Total 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 24 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Unmitigated 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 2.26235 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Total 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 25 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.2447 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0528 0.4512 0.1920 2.8800e- 003 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 576.0000 576.0000 0.0110 0.0106 579.4229 Landscaping 0.0807 0.0306 2.6488 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7537 4.7537 4.6400e- 003 4.8696 Total 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 26 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.2447 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0528 0.4512 0.1920 2.8800e- 003 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 576.0000 576.0000 0.0110 0.0106 579.4229 Landscaping 0.0807 0.0306 2.6488 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7537 4.7537 4.6400e- 003 4.8696 Total 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 27 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:32 AMPage 28 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 32.00 Dwelling Unit 2.90 62,864.00 92 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project Orange County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 1 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - . Construction Phase - Defaults Trips and VMT - Default Demolition - All buildings and asphalt demolition Vehicle Trips - per Traffic Data Woodstoves - No Woodstoves per SCAQMD Rule 445 Energy Use - Default Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - . Energy Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 2 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.60 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.68 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.10 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.05 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7950e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8670e-003 5.2470e-003 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.05 tblFleetMix MH 1.0020e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6770e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8600e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5860e-003 0.01 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 57,600.00 62,864.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.39 2.90 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.91 9.82 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.62 8.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.52 9.44 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 3 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 2.6188 27.1120 16.4134 0.0371 6.6641 1.3042 7.7378 3.3971 1.2188 4.3849 0.0000 3,788.038 3 3,788.038 3 0.7699 0.0000 3,806.499 0 2020 39.5855 17.7752 15.3725 0.0271 0.1677 0.9507 1.1040 0.0445 0.9113 0.9524 0.0000 2,501.031 6 2,501.031 6 0.5454 0.0000 2,512.884 3 Maximum 39.5855 27.1120 16.4134 0.0371 6.6641 1.3042 7.7378 3.3971 1.2188 4.3849 0.0000 3,788.038 3 3,788.038 3 0.7699 0.0000 3,806.499 0 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 2.6188 27.1120 16.4134 0.0371 2.6672 1.3042 3.7409 1.3430 1.2188 2.3308 0.0000 3,788.038 3 3,788.038 3 0.7699 0.0000 3,806.499 0 2020 39.5855 17.7752 15.3725 0.0271 0.1677 0.9507 1.1040 0.0445 0.9113 0.9524 0.0000 2,501.031 6 2,501.031 6 0.5454 0.0000 2,512.884 3 Maximum 39.5855 27.1120 16.4134 0.0371 2.6672 1.3042 3.7409 1.3430 1.2188 2.3308 0.0000 3,788.038 3 3,788.038 3 0.7699 0.0000 3,806.499 0 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.50 0.00 45.20 59.69 0.00 38.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 4 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Energy 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Mobile 0.5729 2.7100 7.5624 0.0249 2.3511 0.0272 2.3784 0.6407 0.0256 0.6662 2,577.873 2 2,577.873 2 0.2278 2,583.567 0 Total 2.0832 3.4003 10.4920 0.0293 2.3511 0.0951 2.4463 0.6407 0.0935 0.7341 0.0000 3,424.785 5 3,424.785 5 0.2485 0.0154 3,435.599 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Energy 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Mobile 0.5729 2.7100 7.5624 0.0249 2.3511 0.0272 2.3784 0.6407 0.0256 0.6662 2,577.873 2 2,577.873 2 0.2278 2,583.567 0 Total 2.0832 3.4003 10.4920 0.0293 2.3511 0.0951 2.4463 0.6407 0.0935 0.7341 0.0000 3,424.785 5 3,424.785 5 0.2485 0.0154 3,435.599 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 5 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2019 3/28/2019 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/29/2019 4/2/2019 5 3 3 Grading Grading 4/3/2019 4/10/2019 5 6 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/11/2019 2/12/2020 5 220 5 Paving Paving 2/13/2020 2/26/2020 5 10 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/27/2020 3/11/2020 5 10 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 127,300; Residential Outdoor: 42,433; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 6 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 7 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.2141 0.0000 3.2141 0.4867 0.0000 0.4867 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 3.2141 1.2863 4.5004 0.4867 1.2017 1.6884 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 297.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 12.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 8 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1234 4.4018 1.0553 0.0115 0.2586 0.0169 0.2755 0.0708 0.0162 0.0870 1,280.920 4 1,280.920 4 0.1337 1,284.263 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0536 0.0351 0.4638 1.4700e- 003 0.1453 9.7000e- 004 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 004 0.0394 146.3982 146.3982 3.6000e- 003 146.4882 Total 0.1770 4.4369 1.5190 0.0130 0.4039 0.0179 0.4218 0.1093 0.0171 0.1264 1,427.318 6 1,427.318 6 0.1373 1,430.751 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.2535 0.0000 1.2535 0.1898 0.0000 0.1898 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2535 1.2863 2.5398 0.1898 1.2017 1.3915 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 9 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1234 4.4018 1.0553 0.0115 0.2586 0.0169 0.2755 0.0708 0.0162 0.0870 1,280.920 4 1,280.920 4 0.1337 1,284.263 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0536 0.0351 0.4638 1.4700e- 003 0.1453 9.7000e- 004 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 004 0.0394 146.3982 146.3982 3.6000e- 003 146.4882 Total 0.1770 4.4369 1.5190 0.0130 0.4039 0.0179 0.4218 0.1093 0.0171 0.1264 1,427.318 6 1,427.318 6 0.1373 1,430.751 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 0.8537 0.8537 0.7854 0.7854 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Total 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 1.5908 0.8537 2.4445 0.1718 0.7854 0.9572 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 10 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0330 0.0216 0.2854 9.0000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 90.0912 90.0912 2.2100e- 003 90.1466 Total 0.0330 0.0216 0.2854 9.0000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 90.0912 90.0912 2.2100e- 003 90.1466 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.6204 0.0000 0.6204 0.0670 0.0000 0.0670 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 0.8537 0.8537 0.7854 0.7854 0.0000 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Total 1.7557 21.5386 11.9143 0.0245 0.6204 0.8537 1.4741 0.0670 0.7854 0.8524 0.0000 2,426.540 8 2,426.540 8 0.7677 2,445.734 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 11 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0330 0.0216 0.2854 9.0000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 90.0912 90.0912 2.2100e- 003 90.1466 Total 0.0330 0.0216 0.2854 9.0000e- 004 0.0894 6.0000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.5000e- 004 0.0243 90.0912 90.0912 2.2100e- 003 90.1466 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 1.0730 1.0730 0.9871 0.9871 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Total 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 6.5523 1.0730 7.6253 3.3675 0.9871 4.3546 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 12 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.5554 0.0000 2.5554 1.3133 0.0000 1.3133 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 1.0730 1.0730 0.9871 0.9871 0.0000 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Total 2.0287 22.7444 10.1518 0.0206 2.5554 1.0730 3.6284 1.3133 0.9871 2.3005 0.0000 2,041.253 9 2,041.253 9 0.6458 2,057.399 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 13 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Total 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 14 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0113 0.3404 0.0900 7.5000e- 004 0.0192 2.3000e- 003 0.0215 5.5200e- 003 2.2000e- 003 7.7200e- 003 81.8907 81.8907 6.9100e- 003 82.0635 Worker 0.0495 0.0324 0.4281 1.3600e- 003 0.1341 9.0000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.3000e- 004 0.0364 135.1368 135.1368 3.3200e- 003 135.2199 Total 0.0607 0.3729 0.5181 2.1100e- 003 0.1533 3.2000e- 003 0.1565 0.0411 3.0300e- 003 0.0441 217.0275 217.0275 0.0102 217.2834 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 0.0000 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Total 2.5581 18.9103 15.2545 0.0250 1.0901 1.0901 1.0449 1.0449 0.0000 2,312.145 4 2,312.145 4 0.4810 2,324.170 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 15 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0113 0.3404 0.0900 7.5000e- 004 0.0192 2.3000e- 003 0.0215 5.5200e- 003 2.2000e- 003 7.7200e- 003 81.8907 81.8907 6.9100e- 003 82.0635 Worker 0.0495 0.0324 0.4281 1.3600e- 003 0.1341 9.0000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.3000e- 004 0.0364 135.1368 135.1368 3.3200e- 003 135.2199 Total 0.0607 0.3729 0.5181 2.1100e- 003 0.1533 3.2000e- 003 0.1565 0.0411 3.0300e- 003 0.0441 217.0275 217.0275 0.0102 217.2834 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Total 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 16 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.5800e- 003 0.3125 0.0825 7.5000e- 004 0.0192 1.6300e- 003 0.0208 5.5200e- 003 1.5600e- 003 7.0800e- 003 81.3387 81.3387 6.5800e- 003 81.5031 Worker 0.0461 0.0291 0.3928 1.3100e- 003 0.1341 8.9000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.2000e- 004 0.0364 130.8052 130.8052 2.9800e- 003 130.8798 Total 0.0557 0.3416 0.4753 2.0600e- 003 0.1533 2.5200e- 003 0.1558 0.0411 2.3800e- 003 0.0435 212.1439 212.1439 9.5600e- 003 212.3829 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 0.0000 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Total 2.2879 17.4336 14.8972 0.0250 0.9482 0.9482 0.9089 0.9089 0.0000 2,288.887 7 2,288.887 7 0.4646 2,300.501 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 17 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.5800e- 003 0.3125 0.0825 7.5000e- 004 0.0192 1.6300e- 003 0.0208 5.5200e- 003 1.5600e- 003 7.0800e- 003 81.3387 81.3387 6.5800e- 003 81.5031 Worker 0.0461 0.0291 0.3928 1.3100e- 003 0.1341 8.9000e- 004 0.1350 0.0356 8.2000e- 004 0.0364 130.8052 130.8052 2.9800e- 003 130.8798 Total 0.0557 0.3416 0.4753 2.0600e- 003 0.1533 2.5200e- 003 0.1558 0.0411 2.3800e- 003 0.0435 212.1439 212.1439 9.5600e- 003 212.3829 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 18 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0576 0.0363 0.4910 1.6400e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 163.5065 163.5065 3.7300e- 003 163.5997 Total 0.0576 0.0363 0.4910 1.6400e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 163.5065 163.5065 3.7300e- 003 163.5997 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 0.0000 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1547 11.5873 11.8076 0.0178 0.6565 0.6565 0.6051 0.6051 0.0000 1,709.218 0 1,709.218 0 0.5417 1,722.760 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 19 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0576 0.0363 0.4910 1.6400e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 163.5065 163.5065 3.7300e- 003 163.5997 Total 0.0576 0.0363 0.4910 1.6400e- 003 0.1677 1.1100e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 003 0.0455 163.5065 163.5065 3.7300e- 003 163.5997 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 39.3356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 39.5778 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 20 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.6900e- 003 4.8400e- 003 0.0655 2.2000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 21.8009 21.8009 5.0000e- 004 21.8133 Total 7.6900e- 003 4.8400e- 003 0.0655 2.2000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 21.8009 21.8009 5.0000e- 004 21.8133 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 39.3356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 39.5778 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 21 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.6900e- 003 4.8400e- 003 0.0655 2.2000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 21.8009 21.8009 5.0000e- 004 21.8133 Total 7.6900e- 003 4.8400e- 003 0.0655 2.2000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0600e- 003 21.8009 21.8009 5.0000e- 004 21.8133 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 22 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.5729 2.7100 7.5624 0.0249 2.3511 0.0272 2.3784 0.6407 0.0256 0.6662 2,577.873 2 2,577.873 2 0.2278 2,583.567 0 Unmitigated 0.5729 2.7100 7.5624 0.0249 2.3511 0.0272 2.3784 0.6407 0.0256 0.6662 2,577.873 2 2,577.873 2 0.2278 2,583.567 0 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 302.08 314.24 273.60 1,024,286 1,024,286 Total 302.08 314.24 273.60 1,024,286 1,024,286 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.682057 0.050367 0.104932 0.052466 0.052466 0.010493 0.010493 0.010493 0.000000 0.010493 0.005247 0.010493 0.000000 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 23 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 2262.35 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Total 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 24 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Unmitigated 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 2.26235 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Total 0.0244 0.2085 0.0887 1.3300e- 003 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 0.0169 266.1586 266.1586 5.1000e- 003 4.8800e- 003 267.7403 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 25 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.2447 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0528 0.4512 0.1920 2.8800e- 003 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 576.0000 576.0000 0.0110 0.0106 579.4229 Landscaping 0.0807 0.0306 2.6488 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7537 4.7537 4.6400e- 003 4.8696 Total 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 26 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.2447 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0528 0.4512 0.1920 2.8800e- 003 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 576.0000 576.0000 0.0110 0.0106 579.4229 Landscaping 0.0807 0.0306 2.6488 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7537 4.7537 4.6400e- 003 4.8696 Total 1.4859 0.4818 2.8408 3.0200e- 003 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0510 0.0000 580.7537 580.7537 0.0157 0.0106 584.2924 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 27 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:36 AMPage 28 of 28 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 32.00 Dwelling Unit 2.90 62,864.00 92 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project Orange County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 1 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - . Construction Phase - Defaults Trips and VMT - Default Demolition - All buildings and asphalt demolition Vehicle Trips - per Traffic Data Woodstoves - No Woodstoves per SCAQMD Rule 445 Energy Use - Default Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - . Energy Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 2 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.60 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.01 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.68 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.10 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.05 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7950e-003 0.01 tblFleetMix MCY 4.8670e-003 5.2470e-003 tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.05 tblFleetMix MH 1.0020e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 0.01 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.6770e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.8600e-004 0.01 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5860e-003 0.01 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 57,600.00 62,864.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.39 2.90 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.91 9.82 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.62 8.55 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.52 9.44 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 3 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.2812 2.1966 1.7028 3.0300e- 003 0.0729 0.1209 0.1937 0.0203 0.1154 0.1356 0.0000 259.8082 259.8082 0.0516 0.0000 261.0992 2020 0.2403 0.3423 0.3088 5.3000e- 004 3.2700e- 003 0.0186 0.0219 8.7000e- 004 0.0177 0.0186 0.0000 44.9213 44.9213 9.2400e- 003 0.0000 45.1523 Maximum 0.2812 2.1966 1.7028 3.0300e- 003 0.0729 0.1209 0.1937 0.0203 0.1154 0.1356 0.0000 259.8082 259.8082 0.0516 0.0000 261.0992 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.2812 2.1966 1.7028 3.0300e- 003 0.0398 0.1209 0.1607 0.0110 0.1154 0.1263 0.0000 259.8079 259.8079 0.0516 0.0000 261.0989 2020 0.2403 0.3423 0.3088 5.3000e- 004 3.2700e- 003 0.0186 0.0219 8.7000e- 004 0.0177 0.0186 0.0000 44.9212 44.9212 9.2400e- 003 0.0000 45.1522 Maximum 0.2812 2.1966 1.7028 3.0300e- 003 0.0398 0.1209 0.1607 0.0110 0.1154 0.1263 0.0000 259.8079 259.8079 0.0516 0.0000 261.0989 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.42 0.00 15.33 43.99 0.00 6.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 4 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.2576 9.4700e- 003 0.3335 5.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0708 7.0708 6.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 7.1227 Energy 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 125.8217 125.8217 4.2200e- 003 1.5100e- 003 126.3760 Mobile 0.0959 0.4949 1.2799 4.1900e- 003 0.4012 4.7300e- 003 0.4059 0.1095 4.4400e- 003 0.1140 0.0000 393.6079 393.6079 0.0357 0.0000 394.5005 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.6568 0.0000 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6615 13.3028 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Total 0.3579 0.5425 1.6296 4.4800e- 003 0.4012 0.0101 0.4113 0.1095 9.8000e- 003 0.1193 8.3183 539.8031 548.1214 0.5616 3.3500e- 003 563.1570 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 3-1-2019 5-31-2019 0.8082 0.8082 2 6-1-2019 8-31-2019 0.7196 0.7196 3 9-1-2019 11-30-2019 0.7120 0.7120 4 12-1-2019 2-29-2020 0.6602 0.6602 5 3-1-2020 5-31-2020 0.1622 0.1622 Highest 0.8082 0.8082 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 5 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.2576 9.4700e- 003 0.3335 5.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0708 7.0708 6.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 7.1227 Energy 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 125.8217 125.8217 4.2200e- 003 1.5100e- 003 126.3760 Mobile 0.0959 0.4949 1.2799 4.1900e- 003 0.4012 4.7300e- 003 0.4059 0.1095 4.4400e- 003 0.1140 0.0000 393.6079 393.6079 0.0357 0.0000 394.5005 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.6568 0.0000 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6615 13.3028 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Total 0.3579 0.5425 1.6296 4.4800e- 003 0.4012 0.0101 0.4113 0.1095 9.8000e- 003 0.1193 8.3183 539.8031 548.1214 0.5616 3.3500e- 003 563.1570 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 6 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2019 3/28/2019 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/29/2019 4/2/2019 5 3 3 Grading Grading 4/3/2019 4/10/2019 5 6 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/11/2019 2/12/2020 5 220 5 Paving Paving 2/13/2020 2/26/2020 5 10 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/27/2020 3/11/2020 5 10 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 127,300; Residential Outdoor: 42,433; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 7 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 8 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0321 0.0000 0.0321 4.8700e- 003 0.0000 4.8700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0230 0.2268 0.1489 2.4000e- 004 0.0129 0.0129 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 21.4161 21.4161 5.4500e- 003 0.0000 21.5524 Total 0.0230 0.2268 0.1489 2.4000e- 004 0.0321 0.0129 0.0450 4.8700e- 003 0.0120 0.0169 0.0000 21.4161 21.4161 5.4500e- 003 0.0000 21.5524 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 297.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 12.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 9 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.2500e- 003 0.0455 0.0108 1.1000e- 004 2.5500e- 003 1.7000e- 004 2.7200e- 003 7.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 11.5480 11.5480 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 11.5787 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 4.4000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2761 1.2761 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2769 Total 1.7900e- 003 0.0459 0.0152 1.2000e- 004 3.9800e- 003 1.8000e- 004 4.1600e- 003 1.0800e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 12.8241 12.8241 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 12.8556 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0125 0.0000 0.0125 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0230 0.2268 0.1489 2.4000e- 004 0.0129 0.0129 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 21.4161 21.4161 5.4500e- 003 0.0000 21.5524 Total 0.0230 0.2268 0.1489 2.4000e- 004 0.0125 0.0129 0.0254 1.9000e- 003 0.0120 0.0139 0.0000 21.4161 21.4161 5.4500e- 003 0.0000 21.5524 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 10 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.2500e- 003 0.0455 0.0108 1.1000e- 004 2.5500e- 003 1.7000e- 004 2.7200e- 003 7.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 11.5480 11.5480 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 11.5787 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 4.4000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2761 1.2761 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2769 Total 1.7900e- 003 0.0459 0.0152 1.2000e- 004 3.9800e- 003 1.8000e- 004 4.1600e- 003 1.0800e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 12.8241 12.8241 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 12.8556 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.3900e- 003 0.0000 2.3900e- 003 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6300e- 003 0.0323 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 3.3020 3.3020 1.0400e- 003 0.0000 3.3281 Total 2.6300e- 003 0.0323 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 2.3900e- 003 1.2800e- 003 3.6700e- 003 2.6000e- 004 1.1800e- 003 1.4400e- 003 0.0000 3.3020 3.3020 1.0400e- 003 0.0000 3.3281 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 11 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1178 0.1178 0.0000 0.0000 0.1179 Total 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1178 0.1178 0.0000 0.0000 0.1179 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6300e- 003 0.0323 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 3.3020 3.3020 1.0400e- 003 0.0000 3.3281 Total 2.6300e- 003 0.0323 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 1.2800e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 004 1.1800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 0.0000 3.3020 3.3020 1.0400e- 003 0.0000 3.3281 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 12 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1178 0.1178 0.0000 0.0000 0.1179 Total 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1178 0.1178 0.0000 0.0000 0.1179 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0197 0.0000 0.0197 0.0101 0.0000 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.0900e- 003 0.0682 0.0305 6.0000e- 005 3.2200e- 003 3.2200e- 003 2.9600e- 003 2.9600e- 003 0.0000 5.5554 5.5554 1.7600e- 003 0.0000 5.5993 Total 6.0900e- 003 0.0682 0.0305 6.0000e- 005 0.0197 3.2200e- 003 0.0229 0.0101 2.9600e- 003 0.0131 0.0000 5.5554 5.5554 1.7600e- 003 0.0000 5.5993 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 13 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2945 0.2945 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2947 Total 1.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2945 0.2945 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2947 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.6700e- 003 0.0000 7.6700e- 003 3.9400e- 003 0.0000 3.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.0900e- 003 0.0682 0.0305 6.0000e- 005 3.2200e- 003 3.2200e- 003 2.9600e- 003 2.9600e- 003 0.0000 5.5554 5.5554 1.7600e- 003 0.0000 5.5993 Total 6.0900e- 003 0.0682 0.0305 6.0000e- 005 7.6700e- 003 3.2200e- 003 0.0109 3.9400e- 003 2.9600e- 003 6.9000e- 003 0.0000 5.5554 5.5554 1.7600e- 003 0.0000 5.5993 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 14 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2945 0.2945 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2947 Total 1.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0100e- 003 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2945 0.2945 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2947 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2417 1.7870 1.4416 2.3600e- 003 0.1030 0.1030 0.0988 0.0988 0.0000 198.2178 198.2178 0.0412 0.0000 199.2487 Total 0.2417 1.7870 1.4416 2.3600e- 003 0.1030 0.1030 0.0988 0.0988 0.0000 198.2178 198.2178 0.0412 0.0000 199.2487 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 15 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0800e- 003 0.0328 8.9300e- 003 7.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 2.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 003 5.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.9490 6.9490 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 6.9641 Worker 4.7400e- 003 3.4600e- 003 0.0384 1.2000e- 004 0.0125 8.0000e- 005 0.0125 3.3100e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.3800e- 003 0.0000 11.1316 11.1316 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 11.1384 Total 5.8200e- 003 0.0363 0.0473 1.9000e- 004 0.0142 3.0000e- 004 0.0145 3.8200e- 003 2.9000e- 004 4.1000e- 003 0.0000 18.0805 18.0805 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 18.1025 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2417 1.7870 1.4416 2.3600e- 003 0.1030 0.1030 0.0987 0.0987 0.0000 198.2176 198.2176 0.0412 0.0000 199.2485 Total 0.2417 1.7870 1.4416 2.3600e- 003 0.1030 0.1030 0.0987 0.0987 0.0000 198.2176 198.2176 0.0412 0.0000 199.2485 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 16 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0800e- 003 0.0328 8.9300e- 003 7.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 2.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 003 5.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.9490 6.9490 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 6.9641 Worker 4.7400e- 003 3.4600e- 003 0.0384 1.2000e- 004 0.0125 8.0000e- 005 0.0125 3.3100e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.3800e- 003 0.0000 11.1316 11.1316 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 11.1384 Total 5.8200e- 003 0.0363 0.0473 1.9000e- 004 0.0142 3.0000e- 004 0.0145 3.8200e- 003 2.9000e- 004 4.1000e- 003 0.0000 18.0805 18.0805 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 18.1025 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0355 0.2702 0.2309 3.9000e- 004 0.0147 0.0147 0.0141 0.0141 0.0000 32.1849 32.1849 6.5300e- 003 0.0000 32.3482 Total 0.0355 0.2702 0.2309 3.9000e- 004 0.0147 0.0147 0.0141 0.0141 0.0000 32.1849 32.1849 6.5300e- 003 0.0000 32.3482 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 17 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.5000e- 004 4.9300e- 003 1.3400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1319 1.1319 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.1343 Worker 7.3000e- 004 5.1000e- 004 5.7700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.0400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.0600e- 003 5.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.7673 1.7673 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7683 Total 8.8000e- 004 5.4400e- 003 7.1100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 2.3300e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.3800e- 003 6.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.8992 2.8992 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.9026 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0355 0.2702 0.2309 3.9000e- 004 0.0147 0.0147 0.0141 0.0141 0.0000 32.1848 32.1848 6.5300e- 003 0.0000 32.3482 Total 0.0355 0.2702 0.2309 3.9000e- 004 0.0147 0.0147 0.0141 0.0141 0.0000 32.1848 32.1848 6.5300e- 003 0.0000 32.3482 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 18 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.5000e- 004 4.9300e- 003 1.3400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1319 1.1319 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.1343 Worker 7.3000e- 004 5.1000e- 004 5.7700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.0400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.0600e- 003 5.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.7673 1.7673 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7683 Total 8.8000e- 004 5.4400e- 003 7.1100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 2.3300e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.3800e- 003 6.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.8992 2.8992 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.9026 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 5.7700e- 003 0.0579 0.0590 9.0000e- 005 3.2800e- 003 3.2800e- 003 3.0300e- 003 3.0300e- 003 0.0000 7.7529 7.7529 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8143 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.7700e- 003 0.0579 0.0590 9.0000e- 005 3.2800e- 003 3.2800e- 003 3.0300e- 003 3.0300e- 003 0.0000 7.7529 7.7529 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8143 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 19 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.7126 0.7126 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7130 Total 2.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.7126 0.7126 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7130 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 5.7700e- 003 0.0579 0.0590 9.0000e- 005 3.2800e- 003 3.2800e- 003 3.0300e- 003 3.0300e- 003 0.0000 7.7529 7.7529 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8143 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.7700e- 003 0.0579 0.0590 9.0000e- 005 3.2800e- 003 3.2800e- 003 3.0300e- 003 3.0300e- 003 0.0000 7.7529 7.7529 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8143 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 20 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.7126 0.7126 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7130 Total 2.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.7126 0.7126 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7130 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.1967 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2100e- 003 8.4200e- 003 9.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2791 Total 0.1979 8.4200e- 003 9.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2791 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 21 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 Total 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.1967 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2100e- 003 8.4200e- 003 9.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2791 Total 0.1979 8.4200e- 003 9.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2791 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 22 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 Total 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 23 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0959 0.4949 1.2799 4.1900e- 003 0.4012 4.7300e- 003 0.4059 0.1095 4.4400e- 003 0.1140 0.0000 393.6079 393.6079 0.0357 0.0000 394.5005 Unmitigated 0.0959 0.4949 1.2799 4.1900e- 003 0.4012 4.7300e- 003 0.4059 0.1095 4.4400e- 003 0.1140 0.0000 393.6079 393.6079 0.0357 0.0000 394.5005 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 302.08 314.24 273.60 1,024,286 1,024,286 Total 302.08 314.24 273.60 1,024,286 1,024,286 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.682057 0.050367 0.104932 0.052466 0.052466 0.010493 0.010493 0.010493 0.000000 0.010493 0.005247 0.010493 0.000000 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 24 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 81.7561 81.7561 3.3800e- 003 7.0000e- 004 82.0486 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 81.7561 81.7561 3.3800e- 003 7.0000e- 004 82.0486 NaturalGas Mitigated 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 44.0655 44.0655 8.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 44.3274 NaturalGas Unmitigated 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 44.0655 44.0655 8.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 44.3274 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 825757 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 44.0655 44.0655 8.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 44.3274 Total 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 44.0655 44.0655 8.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 44.3274 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 25 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 825757 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 44.0655 44.0655 8.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 44.3274 Total 4.4500e- 003 0.0381 0.0162 2.4000e- 004 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 44.0655 44.0655 8.4000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 44.3274 Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 256593 81.7561 3.3800e- 003 7.0000e- 004 82.0486 Total 81.7561 3.3800e- 003 7.0000e- 004 82.0486 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 26 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.2576 9.4700e- 003 0.3335 5.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0708 7.0708 6.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 7.1227 Unmitigated 0.2576 9.4700e- 003 0.3335 5.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0708 7.0708 6.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 7.1227 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 256593 81.7561 3.3800e- 003 7.0000e- 004 82.0486 Total 81.7561 3.3800e- 003 7.0000e- 004 82.0486 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 27 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0197 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2272 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 6.6000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 2.4000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.5317 6.5317 1.3000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.5705 Landscaping 0.0101 3.8300e- 003 0.3311 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5391 0.5391 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.5522 Total 0.2576 9.4700e- 003 0.3335 6.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0708 7.0708 6.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 7.1227 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 28 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0197 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2272 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 6.6000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 2.4000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.5317 6.5317 1.3000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.5705 Landscaping 0.0101 3.8300e- 003 0.3311 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5391 0.5391 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.5522 Total 0.2576 9.4700e- 003 0.3335 6.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0708 7.0708 6.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 7.1227 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 29 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Unmitigated 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Single Family Housing 2.08493 / 1.31441 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Total 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 30 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Single Family Housing 2.08493 / 1.31441 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Total 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Unmitigated 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 31 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Single Family Housing 37.72 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Total 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Single Family Housing 37.72 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Total 7.6568 0.4525 0.0000 18.9695 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 32 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/8/2019 10:39 AMPage 33 of 33 North Orange Olive Road Proposed Project - Orange County, Annual ENERGY Energy Summary Vehicle Fuels Construction Phase (gallons/construction period)Gasoline Diesel Construction Vehicles 17,957 Worker Trips 43 0 Vendor Trips 1 0 Haul Trucks 11 1,018 Total 55 18,975 Project Operations Phase Gasoline (gallons/year)Diesel (gallons/year)Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)Electricity (kWh/yr) Single Family Housing 40,507 3,049 825,757 256,593 All Land Uses 40,507 3,049 825,757 256,593 Existing Uses Operations Phase (gallons/year)Gasoline (gallons/year)Diesel (gallons/year)Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)Electricity (kWh/yr) Elementary School 4,013 715 121,005 62,138 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)8,116 1,564 341,006 47,971 Parking Lot 0 0 0 24,301 Regional Shopping Center 72,931 14,059 47,630 272,444 0 0 0 All Land Uses 85,060 16,339 509,641 406,853 Gasoline (gallons/year)Diesel (gallons/year)Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)Electricity (kWh/yr) Project Net Difference -44,553 -13,290 316,116 -150,260 Fuel Use Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Horsepower Category Load Factor Num Days Year Fuel Consumption Rate (gal/hour) Total Fuel Consumption (gal/construction period) Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 100 0.73 20 2019 4.7 551 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 300 0.40 20 2019 4.5 285 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 100 0.37 20 2019 1.6 282 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 175 0.41 3 2019 3.1 31 Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 300 0.48 3 2019 5.6 64 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 100 0.37 3 2019 1.6 12 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 175 0.41 6 2019 3.1 62 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 300 0.40 6 2019 4.5 86 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 100 0.37 6 2019 1.6 49 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 300 0.29 220 2019 3.3 1,685 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 100 0.20 220 2019 2.0 1,232 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 100 0.74 220 2019 5.2 6,797 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 100 0.37 220 2019 1.6 776 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 50 0.45 220 2019 2.4 5,733 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 25 0.56 10 2020 0.4 17 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 100 0.42 10 2020 1.7 58 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 100 0.36 10 2020 1.6 47 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 100 0.38 10 2020 1.7 103 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 100 0.37 10 2020 1.6 47 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 100 0.48 10 2020 1.3 38 17,957 Onroad Fuel Use Immediate Improvements Phase Name Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Demolition 13 0 297 15 7 20 Site Preparation 8 0 0 15 7 20 Grading 10 0 0 15 7 20 Building Construction 12 3 0 15 7 20 Paving 15 0 0 15 7 20 Architectural Coating 2 0 0 15 7 20 Total Trips and VMT Phase Name Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length All Trips 60 3 297 15 7 20 Fuel Consumption (Gasoline)Fuel Consumption (Diesel) Phase Name Worker Trips Vendor Trips Hauling Trips Worker Trips Vendor Trips Hauling Trips All Trips 43 1 11 0 0 1,018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 43 1 11 0 0 1,018 Total 55 1,018 Gallons of Gasoline and Diesel Year 2020 Vehicle Types MPG by Fuel Type Population by Fuel Type GAS DSL ELEC GAS DSL ELEC Total LDA 27.7 37.1 6,057,424 56,830 135,127 6,114,253 LDT1 23.2 26.5 513,376 635 391 514,011 LDT2 20.7 28.2 2,127,118 3,604 2,130,723 LHDT1 10.9 20.4 119,024 90,013 209,037 LHDT2 10.2 18.7 24,274 37,748 62,022 MCY 35.2 281,781 281,781 MDV 15.3 21.8 1,429,909 21,913 1,451,822 MH 7.4 10.2 36,719 9,447 46,167 MHDT 7.0 8.7 19,066 130,263 149,329 HHDT 4.7 5.8 775 85,233 86,008 OBUS 7.2 7.3 8,230 5,193 13,424 SBUS 11.3 7.2 2,199 5,153 7,352 UBUS 5.0 4.8 2,260 4,492 6,752 Trips/Day Trips/day Trips/day Trips/day Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Single Family Housing 302.08 314.24 273.6 Total 302 314 274 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Total Single Family Housing 0.74704057 0.050832088 0.114929318 0.057464659 0 0 0 0 0 0.011492932 0.005551086 0.011492932 0.001196414 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vehicle Trips Weekday Weekday Trips LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHDT1 LHDT2 MHDT HHDT Obus Ubus MCY Sbus MH Total Daily VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 226 15 35 17 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 0 302 2,813.97 731,633 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 226 15 35 17 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 0 302 731,633 Saturday Saturday Trips LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHDT1 LHDT2 MHDT HHDT Obus Ubus MCY Sbus MH Total Daily VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 235 16 36 18 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 4 0 314 2,814 146,327 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 235 16 36 18 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 4 0 314 146,327 Sunday Sunday Trips LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHDT1 LHDT2 MHDT HHDT Obus Ubus MCY Sbus MH Total Daily VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 204 14 31 16 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 0 274 2,814 146,327 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 204 14 31 16 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 0 274 146,327 Gallons of Fuel Gasoline LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHDT1 LHDT2 MHDT HHD Obus Ubus MCY Sbus MH Total Single Family Housing 27,416 2,239 5,677 3,782 0 0 0 0 0 788 161 310 132 40,507 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,416 2,239 5,677 3,782 0 0 0 0 0 788 161 310 132 40,507 Total Gallons Gasoline Diesel LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV OBUS LHDT2 MHDT HHD Obus Ubus MCY Sbus MH Total Single Family Housing 192 2 7 41 0 0 0 0 0 1,639 0 1,143 25 3,049 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 2 7 41 0 0 0 0 0 1,639 0 1,143 25 3,049 Total Gallons Diesel 43,556 Total Gallons of Diesel and Gasoline 24 Average MPG APPENDIX C GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report Proposed North Orange Olive Development Northeast Corner of N. Orange Olive Road & E.Grove Avenue Orange, California Prepared for: Mr. David Cohen Cohen living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Avenue Orange, CA 92867 January 7, 2019 Project No.: 181055.1 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 January 7, 2019 Project No. 181055.1 Mr. David Cohen Cohen living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Avenue Orange, CA 92867 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report Proposed North Orange Olive Development Northeast Corner of N. Orange Olive Road & E. Grove Avenue Orange, California Dear Mr. David Cohen: In accordance with your request and authorization, Twining Consulting, Inc. is pleased to present the results of our preliminary geotechnical engineering evaluation for the proposed North Orange Olive Development located at Northeast Corner of North Orange Olive Road and East Grove Ave, Orange, CA. The project includes construction of a new 32- unit apartment complex on an approximately 2.9-acre lot. We anticipate that the apartment buildings will be 2-stories tall, wood-framed and likely supported on relatively shallow foundations. The complex includes asphalt-paved driveways and likely concrete pavements for entrances and includes an above-grade garage parking structure. Appurtenant improvements such as concrete flatwork and possibly bioswales (or other means of storm water infiltration) will be incorporated into the project. The purpose of this investigation has been to evaluate the potential geologic hazards and subsurface conditions at the site and to provide preliminary recommendations for the proposed development. Our geotechnical evaluation was performed in conformance with Chapter 18A of Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of the 2016 California Building Code. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, TWINING CONSULTING, INC. Rouzbeh Afshar, Ph.D., P.E. 87032 Paul C. Soltis, P.E. 56140, G.E. 2606 Project Engineer Vice President, Geotechnical Operations 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 2. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 1 2.1. SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................1 2.2. PROPOSED PROJECT .....................................................................................................1 3. SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................................... 1 3.1. LITERATURE REVIEW .....................................................................................................1 3.2. FIELD EXPLORATION ......................................................................................................1 3.3. GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING .........................................................................2 3.4. ENGINEERING ANALYSES AND REPORT PREPARATION ....................................................2 4. SITE GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................. 3 4.1. SUBSURFACE EARTH MATERIALS ...................................................................................3 4.2. GROUNDWATER .............................................................................................................3 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ....... 3 5.1. LIQUEFACTION AND SEISMIC SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL ....................................................3 5.2. LANDSLIDES ..................................................................................................................4 5.3. FLOODING .....................................................................................................................4 5.4. TSUNAMIS AND SEICHES ................................................................................................4 5.5. CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS ..............................................................................4 6. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS ......................... 5 6.1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ...........................................................................................5 6.2. EXPANSIVE AND COLLAPSIBLE SOILS .............................................................................5 6.3. CORROSIVE SOILS .........................................................................................................6 6.3.1. Reinforced Concrete ............................................................................................. 6 6.3.2. Metallic ............................................................................................................... 6 6.4. EARTHWORK AND SITE PREPARATION ...............................................................6 6.4.1. Building Pad and Foundations .............................................................................. 7 6.4.2. Flatwork and Pavement Preparation ..................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 6.4.3. Compacted Fill ...................................................................................................... 7 6.4.4. Temporary Excavations ........................................................................................ 8 6.4.5. Utility Trench Backfill ............................................................................................. 8 6.4.6. Rippability .............................................................................................................. 8 6.4.7. Shrinkage/Bulking Due to Compaction .................................................................. 9 6.4.8. Excavation Bottom Stability ................................................................................... 9 6.4.9. Construction Dewatering ....................................................................................... 9 6.6. CONCRETE SLABS-ON-GRADE ..................................................................................... 10 6.7. DRAINAGE CONTROL ................................................................................................... 12 6.8. PRELIMINARY FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN ................................................... 13 6.9. RIGID PAVEMENT DESIGN ............................................................................................. 13 6.10. STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES RECOMMENDATIONS .............................. 14 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 iii 7. DESIGN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING ........................ 14 7.1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................................ 14 7.2. CONSTRUCTION MONITORING ....................................................................................... 14 8. LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................. 15 9. SELECTED REFERENCES ....................................................................... 17 Figures Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2 – Site Plan and Boring Locations Figure 3 – Regional Geologic Map Figure 4 – Regional Fault Location Map Figure 5 – Earthquake Fault Zones and Seismic Hazards Zones Map Figure 6 – FEMA FIRM Map Appendices Appendix A – Geotechnical Field Exploration Appendix B – Laboratory Testing Appendix C - Percolation Test 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the preliminary geotechnical evaluation performed by Twining Consulting, Inc. (“Twining”) for the proposed North Orange Olive development to be built at Northeast corner of North Orange Olive road and East Grove avenue, Orange, California. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the subsurface conditions of the site and to provide design recommendations for the proposed development. Our geotechnical evaluation was performed in conformance with Chapter 18 of Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of the 2016 California Building Code (CBC). 2. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. Site Location and Existing Conditions The proposed North Orange Olive Development located at Northeast corner of North Orange Olive road and East Grove avenue, Orange, CA, as shown on Figure 1, Site Location Map. The site currently is occupied by a retail development that will demolished as part of this proposed project. The site has an existing building on the northern approximately one-half of the site, a small building at the southwest corner of the site, and asphalt- and concrete-paved surrounding the existing structures as shown on Figure 2, Site Plan. The approximate site coordinates are latitude 33.8211 °N and longitude 117.8504 °W. The site is located on the Orange, California 7½-Minute Quadrangle (United States Geological Survey, 1997). 2.2. Proposed Project We estimated the maximum axial load on the columns to be approximately 100 kips (dead + live loads) and the wall loading to be approximately 12 kips per foot. Should the design loads vary significantly from these values, this office should be contacted to provide revised recommendations. 3. SCOPE OF WORK To prepare this report, we have performed the following tasks: 3.1. Literature Review We reviewed readily available background data including previous geotechnical investigation reports, in-house geophysical data, geologic maps, and topographic maps relevant to the subject site in preparation of this report. A partial list of literature reviewed is presented in the “Selected References” section of this report. 3.2. Field Exploration Field exploration consisting of the drilling of six 8-inch-diameter exploratory borings was conducted at the site on November 26 and December 3, 2018. The borings were advanced to the depth approximately 51½ and 26½ feet. Three additional borings 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 2 were advanced to depth of between 5 feet and 25 feet and prepared for percolation test in accordance with the county of orange guideline. The drilling operation was performed using a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill rig. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Figure 2, Site Plan. Detailed exploration information regarding the borings is presented in Appendix A. 3.3. Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples obtained from the borings in order to aid in the soil classification and to evaluate the engineering properties of the foundation soils. The following tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM standards: • In-situ moisture and density; • Maximum dry density-optimum moisture content; • Corrosivity; • R-value; • Expansion Index; • Soil classification testing including #200 wash sieve and Atterberg limits; • Consolidation; and, • Direct Shear. The detailed laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. 3.4. Engineering Analyses and Report Preparation We compiled and analyzed the data collected from our site reconnaissance, subsurface evaluation, and laboratory testing, and prepared this report to present our conclusions and recommendations. The analyses included: o Evaluation of general subsurface conditions and description of types, distribution, and engineering characteristics of subsurface materials; o Evaluation of site geology and geologic hazards, including site seismicity, liquefaction and seismic settlement potential o Evaluation of site-specific seismic design parameters in accordance with provisions of the 2016 California Building Code; o Evaluation of current and historical groundwater conditions at the site and potential impact on the existing structures; o Evaluation of project feasibility and suitability of on-site soils for foundation support; o Evaluation of expansion potential; o Development of general recommendation for earthwork, including site preparation and excavation; o Recommendation for suitable building foundation system, and provision of allowable bearing capacities, associate settlement estimate and lateral pressures and resistance; 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 3 o Recommendation for slab-on-grade floors including modulus of subgrade reaction; o Recommendation for subgrade preparation for floor slab and slab-on-grade support; o Recommendation for pavement design; and, o Evaluation of the corrosion potential of the on-site earth materials including soil ferrous corrosivity and concrete attack potential o Recommendation for design infiltration rates of the site soil in accordance with the orange county requirements. 4. SITE GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4.1. Subsurface Earth Materials Earth materials encountered during our subsurface investigation consist of an underlain by old alluvial fan deposits (geologic map symbol Qof) extending to the total depth of exploration. The alluvial deposits comprise predominantly Sandy lean Clay Silty Sand and Poorly- Graded Sand with Silt. Detailed information regarding the exploratory excavations is presented in Appendix A, Field Exploration. 4.2. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in the exploratory borings placed on the site during the geotechnical investigation. The historical high depth to groundwater is reportedly at approximately 50 feet at the project site (California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1997). Groundwater conditions may vary across the site due to stratigraphic and hydrologic conditions, and may change over time as a consequence of seasonal and meteorological fluctuations, or of activities by humans at this and nearby sites. 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The site is located in a seismically active area, as is the majority of southern California, and the potential for strong ground motion in the project area is considered high during the design life of the proposed improvements. The hazards associated with seismic activity in the vicinity of the site are discussed in the following sections. 5.1. Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Potential Liquefaction occurs when the pore pressures generated within a soil mass approach the effective overburden pressure. Liquefaction of soils may be caused by cyclic loading such as that imposed by ground shaking during earthquakes. The increase in pore pressure results in a loss of strength, and the soil then can undergo both horizontal and vertical movements, depending on the site conditions. Other phenomena associated with soil liquefaction include sand boils, ground oscillation, and loss of foundation bearing capacity. Liquefaction is generally known to occur in loose, saturated, relatively clean, fine-grained cohesionless soils at depths shallower than approximately 50 feet. Factors to consider in the evaluation of soil liquefaction 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 4 potential include groundwater conditions, soil type, grain size distribution, relative density, degree of saturation, and both the intensity and duration of ground motion. Based on our review of the State of California Official Map of Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation for the Orange Quadrangle (California Geological Survey, 1997), the site is not located within a Zone of Required Investigation for Liquefaction. 5.2. Landslides Based on our review of the referenced geologic maps, literature, and topographic maps, as well as our site investigation, no landslides or related features underlie or are adjacent to the subject site. Due to the relatively level nature of the site and surrounding areas, the potential for landslides at the project site is considered negligible. 5.3. Flooding The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has prepared flood insurance rate maps (FIRMs) for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. Based on our review of online FEMA flood mapping, the site is located within Zone X, which is described as “Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood.” No additional flooding hazards (e.g. dam inundation hazard) are identified in the City of Anaheim General Plan Safety Element. 5.4. Tsunamis and Seiches Tsunamis are waves generated by massive landslides near or under sea water. The site is not located on any State of California – County of Orange Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning. The potential for the site to be adversely impacted by earthquake-induced tsunamis is considered to be negligible because the site is located miles inland from the Pacific Ocean coast, at an elevation exceeding the maximum height of potential tsunami inundation (California Emergency Management Agency and others, 2009). Seiches are standing wave oscillations of an enclosed water body after the original driving force has dissipated. The potential for the site to be adversely impacted by earthquake-induced seiches is considered to be negligible due to the lack of any significant enclosed bodies of water located in the vicinity of the site. 5.5. CBC Seismic Design Parameters Our recommendations for seismic design parameters have been developed in accordance with 2016 CBC and ASCE 7-10 (ASCE, 2010) standards. The applicable site class is E based on the results of our field investigation. Table 3 presents the seismic design parameters for the site in accordance with 2016 CBC. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 5 Table 1 – 2016 California Building Code Design Parameters Design Parameters Value Site Class D Mapped Spectral Acceleration Parameter at Period of 0.2-Second, Ss 1.5g Mapped Spectral Acceleration Parameter at at Period 1-Second, S1 0.572g Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient, Fv 1.5 Adjusted MCER1 Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at Short Period, SMS 1.5 g 1-Second Period Adjusted MCER1 Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SM1 0.859g Short Period Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SDS 1g 1-Second Period Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SD1 0.572g Peak Ground Acceleration, PGAM2 0.503g Seismic Design Category3 D Notes: 1 Risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake 2 Peak ground acceleration adjusted for site effects 3 For S1 greater than or equal to 0.75g, the seismic design category is E 6. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1. General Considerations Based on the results of our field exploration and engineering analyses, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided that the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design plans and are implemented during construction. The following is a list of geotechnical considerations for this project: • Hydro-collapsible soils are observed between 0 to 5 feet and at 15 feet below the ground surface Our geotechnical engineering analyses performed for this report were based on the earth materials encountered during the subsurface exploration for the site. If the design substantially changes, then our geotechnical engineering recommendations would be subject to revision based on our evaluation of the changes. The following sections present our conclusions and recommendations pertaining to the engineering design for this project. 6.2. Expansive and Collapsible Soils Expansive soils are characterized by their ability to undergo significant volume changes (shrink or swell) due to variations in moisture content. Changes in soil moisture content can result from rainfall, landscape irrigation, utility leakage, roof drainage, perched groundwater, drought, or other factors, and may cause 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 6 unacceptable settlement or heave of structures, concrete slabs supported on-grade, or pavements supported over these materials. Depending on the extent and location below finished subgrade, these soils could have a detrimental effect on the proposed construction. Based on our field soil classification, the expansion index classified as “very low” expansion potential. However, our consolidations test results show existing collapsible soil at various depths. Mitigation measurement for collapsible soil is provided in earthwork and site preparation section of this report. 6.3. Corrosive Soils The potential for the near-surface on-site materials to corrode buried steel and concrete improvements was evaluated. Laboratory testing was performed on one representative sample of on-site soils to evaluate pH and electrical resistivity, as well as chloride and sulfate contents. The pH and electrical resistivity tests were performed in accordance with California Test 643, and the sulfate and chloride tests were performed in accordance with California Tests 417 and 422, respectively. These laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. In accordance with the Caltrans (2014) criteria, corrosive soil is defined as the soil has minimum resistivity less than 1,000 ohm-centimeters, or chloride concentration greater than 500 ppm, or sulfate concentration in soils greater than 2,000 ppm, or a pH less than 5.5. Based on the results of resistivity testing we would rate the soil on-site as mildly corrosive. 6.3.1. Reinforced Concrete Laboratory tests indicate that the potential for sulfate attack on concrete in contact with the on-site soils is negligible in accordance with ACI 318, Table 4.3.1. As a minimum, we recommend that Type I or II cement and a water-cement ratio of no greater than 0.5 be used on the project. Test results also indicate that the potential for chloride attack of reinforcing steel in concrete structures and pipes in contact with soil is negligible. 6.3.2. Metallic Laboratory resistivity testing indicates that the on-site near-surface soils are considerred to be not corrosive to buried ferrous metals. 6.4. Earthwork and Site Preparation Site preparation should begin with the removal of utility lines, asphalt, concrete, vegetation, and other deleterious debris from areas to be graded. Tree stumps and roots should be removed to such a depth that organic material is generally not present. Clearing and grubbing should extend to the outside edges of the proposed excavation and fill areas. We recommend that unsuitable materials such as organic matter or oversized material be selectively removed and disposed offsite. The debris and unsuitable material generated during clearing and grubbing should be removed from areas to be graded and disposed at a legal dump site away from the project area. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 7 6.4.1. Building Pad and Foundations In order to control the settlement for hydro-collapsible soils, we recommend an overexcavation and recompaction of the building pad area to a depth of 6 feet below the adjacent grade or 4 feet below the bottom of foundation, whichever is deeper. The exposed bottom should be scarified to a depth of 12 inches and saturated 20 percent over optimum moisture content and compacted to 95 percent relative compaction in accordance with the latest version of ASTM Test Method D1557. In order to further control the settlement, a layer geogrid material (Tensar Triax TX-7 or equivalent) over the compacted bottom. The lateral extent of the overexcavation and geogrid should be at least 5 feet beyond the edge of the future footings. Deeper removals may be required in areas where soft, saturated, or organic materials are encountered, for example, tree root balls or similar. Exterior Flatwork/Sidewalks: Exterior flatwork and sidewalks subgrade that are not subject to vehicle traffic, and that are outside the limits of grading for the building pad area may be excavated to a depth of 2 feet below the adjacent grade or 1 feet on relatively undisturbed and competent native soils. Any undocumented fills encountered during site grading should be completely removed or properly compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557. Pavements: Pavements subgrade that are subject to vehicle traffic and that are outside the limits of grading for the building pad area should be excavated to a depth of at least 3 feet below the adjacent grade or 2 feet below the below the bottom of pavement section and properly compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557. A representative of Twining should observe the bottoms of the excavations prior to placement of any geogrid or aggregate base materials and be present during the placement and compaction of aggregate base materials. 6.4.2. Compacted Fill Fill materials should be moisture conditioned to approximately 2% above optimum moisture content prior to placement. The optimum moisture content will vary with material type and other factors. Moisture conditioning of fill soils should be generally consistent within the soil mass. Continue to place the compacted fill in horizontal lifts of approximately 6 to 8 inches in loose thickness. Prior to compaction, each lift should be watered or dried as needed, mixed, and then compacted by mechanical methods, using multiple wheel pneumatic tired rollers, sheepsfoot rollers, or other appropriate compacting rollers, to a relative compaction as evaluated by the latest version of ASTM D1557. Successive lifts should be treated in a like manner until the desired finish grades are achieved. The evaluation of compaction by Twining should not be considered to preclude any requirements for observation or approval by governing agencies. It is the contractor's responsibility to notify Twining and the appropriate governing agency when project areas are ready for observation, and to provide reasonable time for that review. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 8 6.4.3. Temporary Excavations Temporary excavations for the demolishing, earthwork, footing and utility trench are expected. We anticipate that unsurcharged excavations with vertical side slopes less than 5 feet high will generally be stable; however, some sloughing of cohesionless sandy materials encountered at the site should be expected. Where the space is available, temporary, unsurcharged excavation sides over 5 feet in height should be sloped no steeper than an inclination of 1.5H:1V (horizontal:vertical). Where sloped excavations are created, the tops of the slopes should be barricaded so that vehicles and storage loads do not encroach within 10 feet of the top of the excavated slopes. A greater setback may be necessary when considering heavy vehicles, such as concrete trucks and cranes. Twining should be advised of such heavy vehicle loadings so that specific setback requirements can be established. If the temporary construction slopes are to be maintained during the rainy season, berms are recommended to be graded along the tops of the slopes in order to prevent runoff water from entering the excavation and eroding the slope faces. Excavations shall not undermine the existing adjacent building footings. Where space for sloped excavations is not available, slot-cut or temporary shoring (trench box) may be utilized. For temporary excavations that are less than 6 feet in height adjacent to existing buildings where the excavation extends deeper than the bottom of the existing footing, slot cuts may be utilized. The slots should be no wider than 8 feet and should be excavated in an A-B-C sequence so that there are at least 16 feet spacing between any two excavated slots. The excavated slots should not be left open overnight and should be backfilled on the same day it was excavated before the next set of slots are excavated. Personnel from Twining should observe the excavations so that any necessary modifications based on variations in the encountered soil conditions can be made. All applicable safety requirements and regulations, including CalOSHA requirements, should be met. 6.4.4. Utility Trench Backfill Trench excavations to receive backfill shall be free of trash, debris or other unsatisfactory materials at the time of backfill placement. The utility should be bedded with clean sand to at least one foot over the crown. The bedding sand should have a sand equivalent (SE) of 30 or greater. The remainder of trench backfill may be onsite soils compacted to 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density as per ASTM Standard D1557. 6.4.5. Rippability The earth materials underlying the site should be generally excavatable with heavy-duty earthwork equipment in good working condition. Some gravels, cobbles and man-made debris should be anticipated within the fill soils. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 9 6.4.6. Shrinkage/Bulking Due to Compaction Based on our review of the in-situ soil density data, preliminary volumetric expansion on the order of 10 percent as a result of compaction of on-site soil may be assumed. 6.4.7. Excavation Bottom Stability In general, we anticipate that excavation bottoms of the excavations will be stable and should provide suitable support for the proposed improvements. Unstable bottom conditions may be mitigated by overexcavation of the bottom to suitable depths, and/or replacement with a minimum 6- to 12-inch-thick aggregate base based on the field evaluation. Recommendations for stabilizing excavation bottoms should be based on evaluation in the field by the geotechnical consultant at the time of construction. 6.4.8. Construction Dewatering Due to the absence of shallow groundwater, dewatering measures are not anticipated to be necessary during excavation operations. If needed, considerations for construction dewatering should include anticipated drawdown, volume of pumping, potential for settlement of nearby structures, and groundwater discharge. Disposal of groundwater should be performed in accordance with guidelines of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6.5. Foundation Recommendations A post-tension concrete slab with thickened edges may be used for support of the proposed building, provided that all the footings are placed on subgrade prepared as described in the “Earthwork and Site Preparation” section of this report. The recommended geotechnical foundation design parameters are presented in Table 2 below. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 10 Table 2 – Geotechnical Foundation Design Parameters Minimum Footing Dimensions  A minimum embedment depth of 24 inches and width of 12 inches for perimeter footings should be utilized. Allowable Bearing Pressure  Footing should be supported on compacted fill.  An allowable vertical bearing pressure of 2500 pounds per square foot may be assumed for the post-tension slab.  The allowable bearing values may be increased by one-third for transient live loads from wind or earthquake. Estimated Static Settlement  Less than 1.0 inches total settlement with differential settlement estimated to be less than 0.5 inch over 40 feet.  The static settlement of the foundation system is expected to occur on initial application of loading. Allowable Coefficient of Friction Below Footings 0.25 (against sandy soil) Unfactored Lateral Passive Resistance 300 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure) The passive resistance values may be increased by one-third when considering wind or seismic loading. 6.6. Concrete Slabs-on-Grade For design of concrete floor slabs supported on engineered fill, a modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of 150 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used on compacted, engineered fill. Floor slabs should be designed and reinforced in accordance with the structural engineer’s recommendations. However, for slabs not supporting heavy loads, we recommend that the concrete should have a thickness of at least 4 inches, a 28-day compressive strength of at least 3,000 pounds per square inch (psi), a water-cement ratio of 0.50 or less, and a slump of 4 inches or less. Slabs should be reinforced with at least No. 3 reinforcing bars placed longitudinally at 18 inches on center. The reinforcement should be extended through the control joints to reduce the potential for differential movement. Control joints should be constructed in accordance with recommendations from the structural engineer or architect. For slabs supporting equipment, a minimum thickness of 5 inches is recommended. Additional thickness and reinforcement recommendations may be provided by the structural engineer. All underslab materials should be adequately compacted prior to the placement of concrete. Care should be taken during placement of the concrete to prevent displacement of the underslab materials. The granular material should be dry to moist, and should not be wetted or saturated prior to the placement of concrete. The concrete slab should be allowed to cure properly prior to placing vinyl or other moisture-sensitive floor covering. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 11 Table 3 provides recommendations for various levels of protection against vapor transmission through concrete floor slabs placed over a properly prepared subgrade. Table 3 – Options for Subgrade Preparation Below Concrete Floor Slabs Primary Objective Recommendation Enhanced protection against vapor transmission (For Hotel Building)  Concrete floor slab-on-grade may be placed directly on a 15-mil thick moisture vapor retarder that meets the requirements of ASTM E 1745 Class C (Stego Wrap or similar).  The moisture vapor retarder membrane may be placed directly on the subgrade (ACI302.1R-67); if required for either leveling of the subgrade or for protection of the membrane from protruding gravel, then place about 2 inches of silty sand1 under the membrane.  Special consideration for curing the concrete, such as wet curing, should be made if concrete is placed directly on the impermeable vapor retarder. Above-standard protection against vapor transmission This option is available if the slab perimeter is bordered by continuous footings at least 24 inches deep, OR if the area adjacent and extending at least 10 feet from the slab is covered by hardscape without planters:  2 inches of dry silty sand1; over  Waterproofing plastic membrane 10-mil thick; over  At least 4 inches of ¾-inch crushed rock2 or clean gravel3 to act as a capillary break Standard protection against vapor transmission  2 inches of dry silty sand1; over  Waterproofing plastic membrane 10-mil thick. If required for either leveling of the subgrade or for protection of the membrane from protruding gravel, place at least 2 inches of silty sand1 under the membrane. Notes: 1 The silty sand should have a gradation between approximately 15 and 40 percent passing the No. 200 sieve and a plasticity index (PI) of less than 4. 2 The ¾-inch crushed rock should conform to Section 200-1.2 of the latest edition of the “Greenbook” Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (BNI Publications, Inc., 2012). 3 The gravel should contain less than 10 percent of material passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. The recommendations presented above are intended to reduce the potential for cracking of slabs; however, even with the incorporation of the recommendations 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 12 presented herein, slabs may still exhibit some cracking. The occurrence of concrete shrinkage cracks is independent of the supporting soil characteristics. 6.7. Drainage Control The control of surface water is essential to the satisfactory performance of the building and site improvements. Surface water should be controlled so that conditions of uniform moisture are maintained beneath the improvements, even during periods of heavy rainfall. The following recommendations are considered minimal: • Ponding and areas of low flow gradients should be avoided. • If bare soil within 5 feet of the structure is not avoidable, then a gradient of 5 percent or more should be provided sloping away from the improvement. Corresponding paved surfaces should be provided with a gradient of at least 1 percent. • The remainder of the unpaved areas should be provided with a drainage gradient of at least 2 percent. • Positive drainage devices, such as graded swales, paved ditches, and/or catch basins should be employed to accumulate and to convey water to appropriate discharge points. • Concrete walks and flatwork should not obstruct the free flow of surface water. • Brick flatwork should be sealed by mortar or be placed over an impermeable membrane. • Area drains should be recessed below grade to allow free flow of water into the basin. • Enclosed raised planters should be sealed at the bottom and provided with an ample flow gradient to a drainage device. Recessed planters and landscaped areas should be provided with area inlet and subsurface drain pipes. • Planters should not be located adjacent to the structures wherever possible. If planters are to be located adjacent to the structures, the planters should be positively sealed, should incorporate a subdrain, and should be provided with free discharge capacity to a drainage device. • Planting areas at grade should be provided with positive drainage. Wherever possible, the grade of exposed soil areas should be established above adjacent paved grades. Drainage devices and curbing should be provided to prevent runoff from adjacent pavement or walks into planted areas. • Gutter and downspout systems should be provided to capture discharge from roof areas. The accumulated roof water should be conveyed to off-site disposal areas by a pipe or concrete swale system. • Landscape watering should be performed judiciously to preclude either soaking or desiccation of soils. The watering should be such that it just sustains plant growth without excessive watering. Sprinkler systems should 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 13 be checked periodically to detect leakage and they should be turned off during the rainy season. 6.8. Preliminary Flexible Pavement Design Our pavement structural design is in accordance with Chapter 600 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, which is based on a relationship between the gravel equivalent (GE) of the pavement structural materials, the traffic index (TI), and the R-value of the underlying subgrade soil. For the conventional pavement section recommendations to be valid, the recommendations for subgrade preparation presented in section 6.4 must be followed. Based on our observations made during drilling, there is a high likelihood to encounter moist to wet, soft subgrade soils in subgrade preparation. Soft subgrade conditions can be identified by surface yielding under rubber-tired equipment loading and the inability to achieve proper compaction. The intent of recommended pavement subgrade preparation is to achieve a non-yielding subgrade when subjected to relatively heavy, rubber-tired construction equipment loading such as a loaded water truck or loader with full bucket. The remediated areas should be proof-rolled with this type of equipment after remediation to confirm that the subgrade is unyielding. Table 9 provides minimum thicknesses for HMA and aggregate base sections constructed on top of a properly prepared stabilized subgrade and Table 10 provides minimum thicknesses for HMA and cement-treated sections constructed on top of subgrade. We have provided recommendations for HMA section using an R-value of 18 and TI’s ranging from 5.0 to 7.0 in our analyses. Table 4 Recommended Minimum HMA and Base Section Thicknesses Traffic Index 5.0 6.0 7.0 HMA Thickness (in) 4.0 5.0 6.0 Aggregate Base Thickness (in) 6.0 8.0 10.0 6.9. Rigid Pavement Design Table 5 provides minimum thicknesses for Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement sections constructed on non-expansive engineered fill and underlain by at least 4 inches of Class 2 aggregate base compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557). 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 14 Table 5 – Recommended Minimum PCC Section Thicknesses Location Light Vehicle Parking Firelane / Truck Drive Way Traffic Index 5.0 7.0 PCC Thickness (in) 5.5 6.0 Aggregate Base Thickness (in.) 6.0 6.0 The above pavement section is based on a minimum 28-day Modulus of Rupture (M-R) of 550 psi and a compressive strength of 3,000 psi. Transverse contraction joints should not be spaced more than 15 feet and should be cut to a depth of ¼ the thickness of the slab. Longitudinal joints should not be spaced more than 15 feet apart, however, are not necessary in the pavement adjacent to the curb and gutter section. Positive drainage should be provided away from all pavement areas to prevent seepage of surface and/or subsurface water into the pavement base and/or subgrade. 6.10. Stormwater Quality Control Measures Recommendations Based on the percolation results presented in Appendix C, the on-site infiltration system is not considered feasible because the infiltration rate is less than the minimum required 0.3 inch/hour in accordance with the County of Orange guidelines. The test details are provided in appendix C of this report. 7. DESIGN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Geotechnical review of plans and specifications is of paramount importance in engineering practice. The poor performance of many structures has been attributed to inadequate geotechnical review of construction documents. Additionally, observation of excavations will be important to the performance of the proposed development. The following sections present our recommendations relative to the review of construction documents and the monitoring of construction activities. 7.1. Plans and Specifications The design plans and specifications should be reviewed by Twining prior to bidding and construction, as the geotechnical recommendations may need to be reevaluated in the light of the actual design configuration and loads. This review is necessary to evaluate whether the recommendations contained in this report and future reports have been properly incorporated into the project plans and specifications. Based on the work already performed, this office is best qualified to provide such review. 7.2. Construction Monitoring Site preparation, removal of unsuitable soils, assessment of imported fill materials, fill placement, foundation installation, and other site grading operations should be observed and tested. The substrata exposed during the construction may differ from that encountered in the test excavations. Continuous observation by a representative of Twining during construction allows for evaluation of the soil conditions as they are 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 15 encountered, and allows the opportunity to recommend appropriate revisions where necessary. The project engineer should be notified prior to exposure of subgrades. It is critically important that the engineer be provided with an opportunity to observe all exposed subgrades prior to burial or covering. 8. LIMITATIONS The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report are based on Twining, Inc.’s review of available background documents, on information obtained from field explorations, and on laboratory testing. It should be noted that this study did not evaluate the possible presence of hazardous materials on any portion of the site. In the event that any of our recommendations conflict with recommendations provided by other design professionals, we should be contacted to aid in resolving the discrepancy. Due to the limited nature of our field explorations, conditions not observed and described in this report may be present on the site. Uncertainties relative to subsurface conditions can be reduced through additional subsurface exploration. Additional subsurface evaluation and laboratory testing can be performed upon request. It should be understood that conditions different from those anticipated in this report may be encountered during grading operations, for example, the extent of removal of unsuitable soil, and that additional effort may be required to mitigate them. Site conditions, including groundwater elevation, can change with time as a result of natural processes or the activities of man at the subject site or at nearby sites. Changes to the applicable laws, regulations, codes, and standards of practice may occur as a result of government action or the broadening of knowledge. The findings of this report may, therefore, be invalidated over time, in part or in whole, by changes over which Twining, Inc. has no control. Twining’s recommendations for this site are, to a high degree, dependent upon appropriate quality control of subgrade preparation, fill placement, and foundation construction. Accordingly, the recommendations are made contingent upon the opportunity for Twining to observe grading operations and foundation excavations for the proposed construction. If parties other than Twining are engaged to provide such services, such parties must be notified that they will be required to assume complete responsibility as the geotechnical engineer of record for the geotechnical phase of the project by concurring with the recommendations in this report and/or by providing alternative recommendations. This document is intended to be used only in its entirety. No portion of the document, by itself, is designed to completely represent any aspect of the project described herein. Twining should be contacted if the reader requires additional information or has questions regarding the content, interpretations presented, or completeness of this document. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by the client and its agents for specific application to the proposed project. Land use, site conditions, or other factors may change over time, and additional work may be required with the passage of time. Based on the intended use of this report and the nature of the new project, Twining may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report be issued. Non-compliance 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 16 with any of these requirements by the Client or anyone else will release Twining from any liability resulting from the use of this report by any unauthorized party. Twining performed its evaluation using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable geotechnical professionals with experience in this area in similar soil conditions. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made as to the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Page 17 9. SELECTED REFERENCES American Society of Civil Engineers, 2011, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures: ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10, 608 pp. ASTM, 2013, “Soil and Rock: American Society for Testing and Materials,” vol. 4.08 for ASTM test methods D-420 to D-4914; and vol. 4.09 for ASTM test methods D-4943 to highest number. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1976, Environmental Geology of Orange County, California: Open-File Report 79-8 LA, 474 pp. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1997, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Tustin 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Orange County, California: Seismic Hazard Zone Report 003, 50 pp. plus 4 plates. California Emergency Management Agency, California Geological Survey, and University of Southern California, 2009, Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, Newport Beach Quadrangle: dated March 15, scale 1:24,000. California Geological Survey, 2001, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Orange Quadrangle: Official Map released January 17, scale 1:24,000. Castle, R.O., and Buchanan-Banks, J.M., 1989, Vertical Surface Displacements Along a Part of the Newport-Inglewood Zone of Folds and Faults, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California: United States Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2088. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Orange County. Californa and Unincorporated Areas: Panel 279 of 539, map number 06059C0279J, revised December 3, scale 1”=500’. Jennings, C.W., and Bryant, W.A., 2010, Fault Activity Map of California: California Geological Survey Geologic Data Map No. 6, scale 1:750,000. Miller, R.V., and Tan, S.S., 1976, Geology and Engineering Geologic Aspects of the South Half Tustin Quadrangle, Orange County, California: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 26, 28 pp. plus 1 plate, map scale 1:12,000. Southern California Earthquake Center Group C, 2001, Active Faults in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Region, SCEC Special Publication Series 1, 47 pp. United States Geological Survey, 1981, Orange, Calif. Quadrangle: 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic), Photorevised from 1965 base, scale 1:24,000. FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP REFERENCE: USGS (2018) SCALE IN MILES REPORT DATE January 2019 PROJECT NO. 181055.1 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California SITE 00 0.5 1 FIGURE 2REPORT DATEJanuary 2019PROJECT NO.181055.1SITE PLAN AND BORING LOCATION MAPNOTE: All dimensions, locations, and directions are approximate.0 40 80SCALE IN FEETNorth Orange Olive DevelopmentNE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove AveOrange, CaliforniaREFERENCE: GRAPEVINE DEVELOPMENT (2018)LEGENDHOLLOW-STEM BORINGLOCATION AND DEPTHPERCOLATION TESTLOCATION AND DEPTHB-1TD = 25'P-1TD = 5' P-2TD =5' B-2TD =26.5' B-3TD =51.5' P-1TD =5' B-1TD =25' B-4TD =51.5' B-5TD =26.5' B-6(P-3)TD =26.5' FIGURE 3 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP REFERENCE: DIBBLEE AND EHRENSPECK (1999)0 0.2 0.4 SCALE IN MILES SITE REPORT DATE January 2019 PROJECT NO. 181055.1 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California LEGEND OLD Alluvial Fan Deposit slightly to moderately consolidated, moderately dissected boulder, cobble, gravel , sand and silt deposits issued from a confined valley or canyon. Young Alluvial Fan Deposit Unconsolidated to slightly consolidated, undissected to slightly dissected boulder, cobble, gravel, sand, and silt deposits issued from confined valley or canyon FIGURE 4 REGIONAL FAULT LOCATION MAP REFERENCE: JENNINGS AND BRYANT (2010)0 1.5 3 SCALE IN MILES SITE FAULT ALONG WHICH HISTORIC DISPLACEMENT HAS OCCURRED HOLOCENE FAULT DISPLACEMENT LATE QUATERNARY FAULT DISPLACEMENT QUATERNARY FAULT DISPLACEMENT PRE-QUATERNARY FAULT DISPLACEMENT REPORT DATE January 2019 PROJECT NO. 181055.1 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California FIGURE 5 EARTHQUAKE FAULT ZONES AND SEISMIC HAZARD ZONES MAP REFERENCE: CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (1999) REPORT DATE January 2019 PROJECT NO. 181055.1 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California SCALE IN MILES 00 1 2 Site Appendix A Field Exploration 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Appendix A Field Exploration General Field exploration consisting of the drilling of five 8-inch-diameter exploratory borings was conducted at the site on November 26 and December 3, 2018. The borings were advanced to the depth approximately 51½ feet and 26½ feet. Three additional borings were advanced to depth of 5 and 25 feet and prepared in accordance with the county of orange guideline for percolation testing. The drilling operation was performed using a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill rig. Drilling was performed by Baja Drilling. Drilling and Sampling The Logs of Borings are presented as Figures A-2 through A-9. An explanation of these logs is presented as Figure A-1. The Logs of Borings describe the earth materials encountered, samples obtained, and show the field and laboratory tests performed. The logs also show the boring number, drilling date, and the name of the logger and drilling subcontractor. The borings were logged by a Twining engineer/geologist using the Unified Soil Classification System. The boundaries between soil types shown on the logs are approximate because the transition between different soil layers may be gradual. Drive and bulk samples of representative earth materials were obtained from the borings. A California modified sampler was used to obtain drive samples of the soil encountered. This sampler consists of an approximately 3-inch outside diameter (O.D.), 2.4-inch inside diameter (I.D.) split barrel shaft that is driven a total of 18-inches into the soil at the bottom of the boring. The soil was retained in brass rings for laboratory testing. Additional soil from each drive remaining in the cutting shoe was usually discarded after visually classifying the soil. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is presented on the boring logs. Disturbed samples were obtained using a Standard Penetration Sampler (SPT). This sampler consists of a 2-inch O.D., 1.4-inch I.D. split barrel shaft that is advanced into the soil at the bottom of the drilled hole a total of 18 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is presented on the boring logs. Soil samples obtained by the SPT were retained in air-tight plastic bags. Both the California modified and the SPT sampler were driven by an automatic-trip hammer weighing 140 pounds at a drop height of approximately 30 inches. Upon completion of drilling, the borings were backfilled by the drilling subcontractor using soil derived from the cuttings. The surfaces were patched using native soil. 65 - 85 Loose ConsistencyRelative Density (%) Hard >30 15 - 30Very Stiff85 - 100 ATTCCORRDSEIGSKMAX ORVSESGTXUC Stiff Atterberg LimitsConsolidationCorrosivity SeriesDirect ShearExpansion IndexGrain Size DistributionPermeabilityMoisture/Density(Modified Proctor)Organic ContentResistance ValueSand EquivalentSpecific GravityTriaxial CompressionUnconfined Compression 30 - 50 4 - 8Medium Stiff 2 - 4Soft15 - 35 Sample Type Description 8 - 15 PROJECT NO.181055.1 SPT (blows/ft) Relative Density FIGURE A-1 LABORATORY TESTING ABBREVIATIONS COARSE-GRAINED SOILS 1.4 in I.D., 2.0 in. O.D. driven sampler 2.4 in. I.D., 3.0 in. O.D. driven sampler Retrieved from soil cuttings Pitcher or Shelby Tube SPT California Modified Bulk Thin-Walled Tube NOTE: SPT blow counts based on 140 lb. hammer falling 30 inches Medium Dense EXPLANATION FOR LOG OF BORINGS North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange,California REPORT DATE January 2018 0 - 15 FINE-GRAINED SOILS Very Loose SPT (blows/ft) Dense >50 35 - 6510 - 30 4 - 10 Very Soft<4 Very Dense Sample Symbol <2 GRAPH (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY,GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEANCLAYS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOWPLASTICITY POORLY-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLEOR NO FINES TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS MORE THAN 50% OFCOARSE FRACTIONPASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE SYMBOLS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS ORDIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCKFLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEYSILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLEOR NO FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAYMIXTURES SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURES MAJOR DIVISIONS SILTS AND CLAYS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGHPLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGHORGANIC CONTENTS POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SANDMIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SANDMIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES FINE GRAINED SOILS LIQUID LIMITGREATER THAN50 MORE THAN 50% OFCOARSE FRACTIONRETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE SILTS AND CLAYS MORE THAN 50% OFMATERIAL IS LARGER THANNO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SANDS WITH FINES SAND AND SANDY SOILS CLEAN SANDS CLEAN GRAVELSGRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OFMATERIAL IS SMALLERTHAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE (LITTLE OR NO FINES) (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OFFINES) LIQUID LIMITLESS THAN50 LETTER STANDARD LOG EXPLANATION 180138.1 - SUNFLOWER APARTMENTS.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 4/6/18 117.2 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, medium dense, dark brown, moist very dense same same Auger refusal @25' Total Depth = 25.0 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt GP SM Consol18 50/2" 50/4" 50/3" 9.6 3.7ELEVATION (feet)186 181 176 171 166 161 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)191 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 5 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-1 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 126.5 111.4 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY,stiff, reddish brown, moist SILTY SAND with some gravel, dense, dark brown to gray, moist very dense Poorly graded SAND with SILT and GRAVEL, very dense,brown to dark gray, moist No recover Total Depth = 26.5 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt ML SM SP-SM DS Consol 29 37 50/3" 45 50/5" 13.0 6.8 3.0ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 3 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-2 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 113.2 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY and GRAVEL,hard, brown, moist SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, gray to light brown, moist No sample same same same GP ML SM Compaction, Remold DS(90%), EI 50/3" 67 50/3" 50/4" 50/2" 11.3 2.9 3.2 4.1 3.8ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 4 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-3 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, gray to light brown, moist (continued) same same same same same Total Depth = 51.5 feet Backfilled on 12/3/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt SM50/2" 50/4" 50/2" 50/3" 50/5"ELEVATION (feet)155 150 145 140 135 130 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)35 40 45 50 55 60 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 4 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-3 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CALY and GRAVEL,medium stiff,dark brown, moist SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, medium brown, moist same No recovery ML SMConsol 8 66 66 50/3" 50/2" 3.0 3.7ELEVATION (feet)186 181 176 171 166 161 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)191 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 2 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-4 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, medium brown, moist (continued) dark brown light brown to gray No recovery No recovery No recovery Total Depth = 51.5 feet Backfilled on 12/3/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt SM50/3" 50/4" 50/3" 50/2" 50/4" 3.5ELEVATION (feet)156 151 146 141 136 131 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)191 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)35 40 45 50 55 60 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 2 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-4 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 121.2 111.8 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY, stiff, reddish brown, moist with gravel same SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, dark gray, moist Total Depth = 26.5 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt GP ML SM DS15 15 50/3" 50/5" 50/3" 12.7 14.4 2.7ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 6 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-5 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 119.9 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY , hard, reddish brown, moist same SANDY lean CLAY, medium stiff, reddishbrown, moist SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, redish brown, moist Poorly-graded SAND with SILT and GRAVEL, dark gray, moist Total Depth = 26.5 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt GP ML CL SM SP-SM Corrosivity, RV Wash #200, ATT 13 7 50/2" 86 50/4" 13.3 13.3 2.3ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 7 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-6 (P-3)MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CALY and GRAVEL,medium stiff,dark brown, moist Total Depth = 5.0 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt MLELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 8 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.P-1 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY and GRAVEL,medium stiff,dark brown, moist Total Depth = 5.0 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt MLELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 9 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.P-2 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 18011 Sky Park Circle, Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949 .426.3355 Fax 949.553.0371 Appendix B Laboratory Testing 18011 Sky Park Circle, Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949 .426.3355 Fax 949.553.0371 Appendix B Laboratory Testing Laboratory Moisture Content and Density Tests The moisture content and dry densities of selected driven samples obtained from the exploratory borings were evaluated in general accordance with the latest version of ASTM D 2937. The test results are presented on the logs of the exploratory borings in Appendix A. Wash Sieve The amount of fines passing the No. 200 sieve was evaluated by the wash sieve. The test procedure was in general accordance with ASTM D 1140. The results are presented in Table B-2. Atterberg Limits Liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of the soil are evaluated. The test procedure was in general accordance with ASTM D 4318. The results are presented in Figures B-1 and Table B-3. Maximum Dry Density-Optimum Moisture Content A Modified Proctor test was performed on near-surface soils to evaluate the maximum dry density and optimum water content for compaction. The test was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557 Method A. The result is summarized below in Table B-1 and a copy of the curve is presented as Figure B-2. Expansion Index Test The expansion index was evaluated in general accordance with ASTM D 4829. The specimen was molded under a specified compactive energy at approximately 50 percent saturation. The prepared 1-inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimen was loaded with a surcharge of 144 pounds per square foot and was inundated with tap water. Readings of volumetric swell were made for a period of 24 hours. The result of the Expansion Index test is presented on Table B-4. Consolidation Test Consolidation tests were performed on a selected driven soil sample by in general accordance with the latest version of ASTM D2435. The sample was inundated during testing to represent adverse field conditions. The percent consolidation for each load cycle was recorded as a ratio of the amount of vertical compression to the original height of the sample. The results of the test are presented in Figures B-3 through B-5. 18011 Sky Park Circle, Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949 .426.3355 Fax 949.553.0371 Direct Shear Tests Direct shear tests were performed on selected remolded and relatively undisturbed soil samples in general accordance with ASTM D 3080 to evaluate the shear strength characteristics of the materials. The samples were inundated during shearing to represent adverse field conditions. The results are summarized in Table B-5 and are illustrated graphically in Figures B-6 and B-8. Corrosivity Soil pH and resistivity tests were performed by Anaheim Test Lab on a representative soil sample in general accordance with the latest version of California Test Method 643. The chloride content of the selected sample was evaluated in general accordance with the latest version of California Test Method 422. The sulfate content of the selected samples was evaluated in general accordance with the latest version of California Test Method 417. The test results are presented on Table B-6. Resistance Value (R-Value) R-value testing was performed on a select bulk sample of the near-surface soils encountered at the site. The test was performed in general accordance with ASTM D 2844. The results are summarized in Table B-7. Table B-1 Moisture-Density Relationship Testing ASTM D 1557 Method A Boring No. Depth (feet) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) Optimum Water Content (%) B-3 1 – 5 130.0 8.4 Table B-2 No. 200 Wash Sieve Results Boring No. Depth (feet) Percent Passing #200 B-6 10 61.5 18011 Sky Park Circle, Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949 .426.3355 Fax 949.553.0371 Table B-3 Atterberg Limits Results Boring No. Depth (feet) Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plastic Index U.S.C.S. Classification B-6 10 25 16 10 SANDY lean CLAY Table B-4 Expansion Index Test Result Boring No. Depth (feet) Expansion Index B-3 1 – 5 7 Table B-5 Direct Shear Tests Boring No. Depth (feet) Remolded Peak Ultimate C (psf)  (deg) C (psf)  (deg) B-2 5 No 576 29 456 29 B-3 0-5 Yes 252 28 84 30 B-5 5 No 444 31 60 32 Table B-6 Soil Corrosivity Test Results Boring No. Depth (feet) pH Water Soluble Sulfate (ppm) Water Soluble Chloride (ppm) Minimum Resistivity (ohm-cm) B-6 1-5 7.0 181 61 3,000 Table B-7 Resistance Value (R-Value) Boring No. Depth (feet) R-Value B-6 1– 5 18 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 20 40 60 80 100 ML CL MH CH Sample Location LIQUID LIMIT LL ATTERBERG LIMITS PL PI U.S.C.S. Classification 925 16 CL-ML P L A S T I C I T Y I N D E X B-6 (P-3) at 10 ft FIGURE B-1 SANDY lean CLAY PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California ATTERBERG LIMITS NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/4/19 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 % TEST RESULTS 130.0 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP 2.80 2.70 2.60 2.50 Curves of 100% Saturation for Specific Gravity Equal to: pcfMaximum Dry Density:DRY DENSITY, pcfSANDY SILT with CLAY and GRAVEL 0-5' 8.5Optimum Water Content: Boring No.: FIGURE B-2 B-3 ASTM D1557 Method A 12/28/2018 Test Method: Sampled By: Sample Date: Test Date: Sample Depth: Sample Description: SZ 12/21/2018 WATER CONTENT, % PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California COMPACTION (MODIFIED BY PAUL) NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.1 1 10 100 CONSOLIDATION TESTSTRAIN, %STRESS, ksf 117.2 9.6 FIGURE B-3 Soil Description Dry Density (pcf) Moisture Content (%) SILTY SAND Sample Location B-1 at 5 ft PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California CONSOL STRAIN NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.1 1 10 100 CONSOLIDATION TESTSTRAIN, %STRESS, ksf 111.4 6.8 FIGURE B-4 Soil Description Dry Density (pcf) Moisture Content (%) SILTY SAND Sample Location B-2 at 15 ft PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California CONSOL STRAIN NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.1 1 10 100 CONSOLIDATION TESTSTRAIN, %STRESS, ksf 3.0 FIGURE B-5 Soil Description Dry Density (pcf) Moisture Content (%) SILTY SAND Sample Location B-4 at 10 ft PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California CONSOL STRAIN NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 DIRECT SHEAR TEST NORMAL PRESSURE, psfSHEAR STRENGTH, psfShear Strength Parameters Peak B-2 5 SANDY SILT with CALY 126.5 576 29 13.0 14.6 456 29 FIGURE B-6 B-2 5 SANDY SILT with CALY 126.5 Ultimate Cohesion, C (psf): Friction Angle, Ø (deg): Initial Moisture (%): Final Moisture (%): Boring No.: Sample Depth (ft): Sample Description: Strain Rate (in./min): Dry Density (pcf): PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California DIRECT SHEAR NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 DIRECT SHEAR TEST NORMAL PRESSURE, psfSHEAR STRENGTH, psfShear Strength Parameters Peak B-3 SANDY SILT with CLAY 252 28 11.3 84 30 FIGURE B-7 B-3 SANDY SILT with CLAY Ultimate Cohesion, C (psf): Friction Angle, Ø (deg): Initial Moisture (%): Final Moisture (%): Boring No.: Sample Depth (ft): Sample Description: Strain Rate (in./min): Dry Density (pcf): PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California DIRECT SHEAR NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/190-5 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 DIRECT SHEAR TEST NORMAL PRESSURE, psfSHEAR STRENGTH, psfShear Strength Parameters Peak B-5 5 SANDY SILT 121.2 444 31 12.7 12.3 60 32 FIGURE B-8 B-5 5 SANDY SILT 121.2 Ultimate Cohesion, C (psf): Friction Angle, Ø (deg): Initial Moisture (%): Final Moisture (%): Boring No.: Sample Depth (ft): Sample Description: Strain Rate (in./min): Dry Density (pcf): PROJECT NO. 181055.1 REPORT DATE January 2019 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California DIRECT SHEAR NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 18011 Sky Park Circle, Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949 .426.3355 Fax 949.553.0371 Appendix C Percolation Testing 18011 Sky Park Circle, Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949 .426.3355 Fax 949.553.0371 Percolation Testing Percolation testing was performed in the soil borings on November 27, 2018 in conformance with the County of Orange TGD (County of Orange, 2013). The purpose of the tests was to evaluate the percolation rates of the subgrade soils in order to determine the infiltration rates at the proposed infiltration locations. The clayey and silty- soil criteria were implemented to determine if 6 inches of water wouldn’t seep away in less than 25 minutes over two consecutive measurements. Therefore, soils need to be pre-soak (fill) overnight, and obtain at least twelve measurements per hole over at least six hours with precision of at least 0.25 inch. Three of the borings met the clayey soils criteria; therefore, the test was performed next day after 24 hours pre-soak. The infiltration rate was calculated using the Porchet Method as described in County of Orange TGD (County of Orange, 2013). A factor of safety of 2.0 was applied to the final readings from each percolation test. The following Table 1 summarizes the design infiltration rate for each boring. Results of the percolation testing are provided here in Table 1. Table 1: Calculated Infiltration Rates Boring Location Calculated Infiltration Rate* (inch/hour) P-1 0 P-2 0.07 P-3 0.05 *Based on a Factor of Safety of 2 PERCOLATION TEST DATA Project No.:181055.1 Project Name:N. Orange Olive Development Test Date:November 27, 2018 Test Boring No.:P-1 Diameter of Boring (D):0.67 feet Depth of Boring (db):5.0 feet Test Performer:SZ Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial depth to water Greater than or Equal to 6"? T i T f T d1 d2 d1 (Yes/No) (min) (feet) (feet) (inch) 9:00:00 AM 9:25:00 AM 25.00 0.29 0.38 1.00 No 9:35:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 25.00 0.25 0.33 1.00 No Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial height of water column Final height of water column Drop of water column Tested Infiltration Rate Infiltration Rate w/ Factor of Safety of 2 T i T f T d1 d2 di df d = di - df I t It/2 (min) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (inch) (inch/hr) (inch/hr) Percolation Test 9:12:00 AM 9:42:00 AM 30.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9:45:00 AM 10:15:00 AM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 10:25:00 AM 10:55:00 AM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 11:00:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 11:45:00 AM 12:15:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 12:20:00 PM 12:50:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 1:00:00 PM 1:30:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 1:30:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (inch/hr) Infiltration Rate Calculations *Infiltration Rate: Reference: County of Orange Technical Guidance Document, dated December 20, 2013 *Based on the last dropped obtained in the final 30 minutes Sandy Soil Criteria Test Time of Testing (November 26, 2018) Water Level Measurements Time of Testing Water Level Measurements Water Level Calculations D db dG PERCOLATION TEST DATA Project No.:181055.1 Project Name:N. Orange Olive Development Test Date:November 27, 2018 Test Boring No.:P-2 Diameter of Boring (D):0.67 feet Depth of Boring (db):5.0 feet Test Performer:SZ Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial depth to water Greater than or Equal to 6"? T i T f T d1 d2 d1 (Yes/No) (min) (feet) (feet) (inch) 9:53:00 AM 10:18:00 AM 25.00 1.70 2.00 3.60 No 10:20:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 25.00 1.60 1.90 3.60 No Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial height of water column Final height of water column Drop of water column Tested Infiltration Rate Infiltration Rate w/ Factor of Safety of 2 T i T f T d1 d2 di df d = di - df I t It/2 (min) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (inch) (inch/hr) (inch/hr) Percolation Test 9:15:00 AM 9:45:00 AM 30.00 3.10 3.20 1.90 1.80 1.20 0.20 0.10 9:50:00 AM 10:20:00 AM 30.00 3.00 3.10 2.00 1.90 1.20 0.19 0.09 10:25:00 AM 10:55:00 AM 30.00 2.90 3.00 2.10 2.00 1.20 0.18 0.09 11:00:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 30.00 2.70 2.80 2.30 2.20 1.20 0.17 0.08 11:35:00 AM 12:05:00 PM 30.00 2.50 2.60 2.50 2.40 1.20 0.15 0.08 12:10:00 PM 12:40:00 PM 30.00 2.20 2.30 2.80 2.70 1.20 0.14 0.07 12:50:00 PM 1:20:00 PM 30.00 2.20 2.30 2.80 2.70 1.20 0.14 0.07 1:25:00 PM 1:55:00 PM 30.00 2.20 2.30 2.80 2.70 1.20 0.14 0.07 0.07 (inch/hr) Infiltration Rate Calculations *Infiltration Rate: Reference: County of Orange Technical Guidance Document, dated December 20, 2013 *Based on the last dropped obtained in the final 30 minutes Sandy Soil Criteria Test Time of Testing (November 26, 2018) Water Level Measurements Time of Testing Water Level Measurements Water Level Calculations D db dG PERCOLATION TEST DATA Project No.:181055.1 Project Name:N. Orange Olive Development Test Date:November 27, 2018 Test Boring No.:P-3 Diameter of Boring (D):0.67 feet Depth of Boring (db):25.0 feet Test Performer:SZ Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial depth to water Greater than or Equal to 6"? T i T f T d1 d2 d1 (Yes/No) (min) (feet) (feet) (inch) 2:12:00 PM 2:37:00 PM 25.00 14.75 15.02 3.24 No 2:45:00 PM 3:10:00 PM 25.00 14.00 14.27 3.24 No Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial height of water column Final height of water column Drop of water column Tested Infiltration Rate Infiltration Rate w/ Factor of Safety of 2 T i T f T d1 d2 di df d = di - df I t It/2 (min) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (inch) (inch/hr) (inch/hr) Percolation Test 9:15:00 AM 9:45:00 AM 30.00 13.90 14.40 11.10 10.60 6.00 0.18 0.09 10:00:00 AM 10:30:00 AM 30.00 6.40 6.90 18.60 18.10 6.00 0.11 0.05 10:35:00 AM 11:05:00 AM 30.00 5.50 6.00 19.50 19.00 6.00 0.10 0.05 11:10:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 30.00 4.90 5.40 20.10 19.60 6.00 0.10 0.05 11:45:00 AM 12:15:00 PM 30.00 4.30 4.80 20.70 20.20 6.00 0.10 0.05 12:25:00 PM 12:55:00 PM 30.00 3.60 4.10 21.40 20.90 6.00 0.09 0.05 1:00:00 PM 1:30:00 PM 30.00 3.60 4.10 21.40 20.90 6.00 0.09 0.05 1:35:00 PM 2:05:00 PM 30.00 3.50 4.00 21.50 21.00 6.00 0.09 0.05 0.05 (inch/hr) Infiltration Rate Calculations *Infiltration Rate: Reference: County of Orange Technical Guidance Document, dated December 20, 2013 *Based on the last dropped obtained in the final 30 minutes Sandy Soil Criteria Test Time of Testing (November 26, 2018) Water Level Measurements Time of Testing Water Level Measurements Water Level Calculations D db dG APPENDIX D HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS D1 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT D2 EDR RECORD SEARCH FORM-LBF-DCA tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com North Orange Olive Road Residential 1997 North Orange Olive Road Orange, CA 92865 Inquiry Number: 5509310.2s December 11, 2018 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 286 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested TC5509310.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1997 NORTH ORANGE OLIVE ROAD ORANGE, CA 92865 COORDINATES 33.8212000 - 33˚ 49’ 16.32’’Latitude (North): 117.8504140 - 117˚ 51’ 1.49’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 421299.1UTM X (Meters): 3742462.5UTM Y (Meters): 202 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5641308 ORANGE, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140513, 20140514Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 5509310.2s Page 2 J39 RYDER PIG 310 W GROVE CA HIST UST Lower 1207, 0.229, West J38 FEDEX FREIGHT ONG 310 W GROVE RCRA-SQG, CA LUST, FINDS, ECHO, CA HIST CORTESE,... Lower 1207, 0.229, West J37 RYDER/PIE NATIONWIDE 310 W GROVE AVE CA HIST UST Lower 1207, 0.229, West J36 ANR FRIEGHT TERMINAL 310 WEST GROVE CA HIST UST, CA NPDES, CA CIWQS Lower 1207, 0.229, West I35 CABLESCAN INC 145 E EMERSON RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 1198, 0.227, NNW 34 LIQUINOX COMPANY 221 W MEATS AVENUE CA HIST UST, CA FID UST Lower 1189, 0.225, WNW H33 PREFERRED AUTO BODY 1821 N GLASSELL CA FID UST, CA EMI Lower 1178, 0.223, SSW H32 C S MATTRESS 1821 N GLASSELL CA HIST UST Lower 1178, 0.223, SSW G31 APPLIED FRICTION TEC 230 E EMERSON AVE ST RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1023, 0.194, NNW 30 BURLINGTON ENGINEERI 220 WEST GROVE AVENU RCRA-LQG, CA EMI, CA NPDES, CA WDS, CA CIWQS Lower 983, 0.186, WSW 29 CENTURY INDEX CORP 1870 N GLASSELL ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 943, 0.179, SW G28 CIRTECH INC 250 EAST EMERSON AVE RCRA-LQG, CA ENVIROSTOR, TRIS, RAATS, RI MANIFEST,...Higher 922, 0.175, North 27 HONEYCUTT TEAR OFF 2163 N GLASSELL ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, CA HAZNET Lower 899, 0.170, NNW F26 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF 2050 N GLASSELL ST CA UST Lower 832, 0.158, West F25 ORANGE RESOURCE RECY 2050 N GLASSELL CA SWEEPS UST, CA PROC Lower 832, 0.158, West F24 ORANGE RESOURCE RECO 2050 N. GLASSELL CA UST Lower 832, 0.158, West F23 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF 2050 NORTH GLASSELL CA SWF/LF Lower 832, 0.158, West E22 HIGHTOWER PLATING AN 2090 NORTH GLASSELL RCRA-LQG Lower 743, 0.141, WNW E21 HIGHTOWER PLATING & 2090 N GLASSELL BLVD CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA EMI, CA HAZNET, CA NPDES,... Lower 743, 0.141, WNW E20 ANILLO COMPANY 2090 GLASSELL ST CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 743, 0.141, WNW E19 HIGHTOWER METAL PROD 2090 N GLASSELL ST CA HIST UST, CA WDS Lower 743, 0.141, WNW E18 ANILLO INDUSTRIES, I 2090 N GLASSELL ST CA HIST UST Lower 743, 0.141, WNW D17 RICKS TRUCKWORKS 1962 N GLASSELL ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, CA HAZNET Lower 742, 0.141, WSW C16 FINE FINISH SASH AND 227 E MEATS AVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 676, 0.128, NNW D15 MERCO MFG CO 1927 GLASSEL ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 641, 0.121, WSW C14 ORANGE OLIVE GASOLIN 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE CA UST Higher 619, 0.117, North C13 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 619, 0.117, North C12 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST Higher 619, 0.117, North C11 ORANGE OLIVE ARCO 2101 ORANGE OLIVE RO CA UST Higher 503, 0.095, North C10 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 ORANGE OLIVE RD CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Higher 503, 0.095, North C9 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 ORANGE OLIVE R CA HIST UST Higher 503, 0.095, North C8 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 ORANGE OLIVE R CA FID UST Higher 503, 0.095, North C7 NATES ARCO AUTOCARE 2101 ORANGE-OLIVE RD EDR Hist Auto Higher 503, 0.095, North B6 FIRE STATION 3 1910 N SHAFFER ST CA HIST UST Higher 459, 0.087, SE B5 1910 SHAFFER ST CA AST Higher 459, 0.087, SE B4 ORANGE FIRE STATION 1910 N SHAFFER ST CA AST Higher 459, 0.087, SE B3 CITY OF ORANGE FIRE 1910 N SHAFFER CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 459, 0.087, SE A2 218 E MEATS AVE CA AST Lower 353, 0.067, NW A1 BASF CORP 210 E MEATS AVE RCRA-SQG, TRIS Lower 247, 0.047, WNW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1997 NORTH ORANGE OLIVE ROAD ORANGE, CA 92865 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 5509310.2s Page 3 69 COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1465 N. BATAVIA STRE CA ENVIROSTOR, CA SCH, CA Orange Co. Industrial... Lower 4687, 0.888, SW R68 FXI INC 2060 N BATAVIA ST SEMS-ARCHIVE, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-LQG, CA ENVIROSTOR,...Lower 3941, 0.746, West R67 FXI, INC. 2060 NORTH BATAVIA CA ENVIROSTOR, CA VCP, CA DEED, CA HAZNET Lower 3941, 0.746, West 66 CONTINENTAL MOLDING 1841 N. BATAVIA STRE CA RESPONSE, CA ENVIROSTOR, CA HIST Cal-Sites Lower 3337, 0.632, WSW 65 ORANGE PRECISION CIR 812 SOUTHERN AVE SEMS-ARCHIVE, CORRACTS, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-SQG, CA...Lower 3324, 0.630, WNW 64 VAN DOREN RUBBER CO, 2095 NORTH BATAVIA CA ENVIROSTOR, CA EMI Lower 3285, 0.622, West Q63 ULTRA-PURE METAL FIN 1764 CASE ST RCRA-LQG, CA ENVIROSTOR, CA NPDES, CA WDS, CA... Lower 2747, 0.520, WSW Q62 CIRCUIT CONNECTION I 1739 N. CASE ST RCRA-SQG, CA ENVIROSTOR, CA LUST, FINDS, ECHO, CA...Lower 2731, 0.517, SW 61 ORANGE POST OFFICE 1075 N TAFT CA LUST Higher 2620, 0.496, SE P60 RICK HAMM CONSTRUCTI 2314 N PACIFIC CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 2614, 0.495, NW P59 RICK HAMM CONSTRUCTI 2314 PACIFIC ST CA LUST Lower 2614, 0.495, NW N58 RSA SOIL PRODUCTS, I 701 W GROVE CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 2607, 0.494, West O57 DESERT PETROLEUM SS 2440 GLASSELL ST CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 2605, 0.493, NNW O56 DESERT PETROLEUM SS 2440 N GLASSELL ST CA LUST Lower 2605, 0.493, NNW N55 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISE 700 GROVE AVE CA LUST, CA HIST CORTESE Lower 2532, 0.480, West O54 SA RECYCLING 2411 N GLASSEL ST CA PROC Lower 2508, 0.475, NNW N53 COCA COLA BOTTLING C 700 W GROVE CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, CA NPDES, CA... Lower 2435, 0.461, West 52 CONTINUOUS COATING C 520 W. GROVE CA ENVIROSTOR Lower 2023, 0.383, West 51 THOMPSON BUILDING MA 141 TAFT AVE CA LUST Lower 1954, 0.370, SSW 50 THOMPSON BUILDING MA 141 W TAFT AVE CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1847, 0.350, SW M49 STRAUB FAMILY TRUST 410 W GROVE AV CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA EMI Lower 1684, 0.319, West M48 STRAUB DISTRIBUTING 410 GROVE CA LUST Lower 1604, 0.304, West M47 STRAUB DISTRIBUTION 410 CA HIST CORTESE Lower 1604, 0.304, West L46 FORMER SANTIAGO HEAT 231 BLUERIDGE CA LUST Lower 1498, 0.284, SW L45 AIR CABIN ENGINEERIN 231 W BLUERIDGE AVE CA LUST, CA HAZNET Lower 1477, 0.280, SW K44 WESTPAC MATERIALS 345 W MEATS AVE CA LUST, CA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, TRIS, CA HIST... Lower 1462, 0.277, WNW K43 HAMILTON MATERIALS I 345 W MEATS AV CA LUST, CA HIST UST, CA EMI Lower 1462, 0.277, WNW I42 SUMMIT INTERCONNECT 230 BRISTOL LN CA ENVIROSTOR, CA HAZNET Lower 1299, 0.246, NNW I41 RONEL ENTERPRISES 2207 N GLASSELL ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 1270, 0.241, NNW I40 MARBIL INDUSTRIES IN 2201 N GLASSELL ST RCRA-SQG, CA HAZNET Lower 1267, 0.240, NNW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1997 NORTH ORANGE OLIVE ROAD ORANGE, CA 92865 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CA CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites CA BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites CA WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database CA SWRCY Recycler Database CA HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register CA CDL Clandestine Drug Labs CA Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites CA CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks Local Land Records CA LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CA CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System CA LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing CA MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing CA SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan CA Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CA CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List CA DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities CA ENF Enforcement Action Listing CA Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing CA ICE ICE CA HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database CA MINES Mines Site Location Listing CA MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing CA PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing CA Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records CA UIC UIC Listing CA WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing CA CERS CERS CA WIP Well Investigation Program Case List CA SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) CA OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) CA WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) CA MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) CA PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) CA UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) CA PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 CA NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) CA WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives CA RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List CA RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE PRECISION CIR 812 SOUTHERN AVE WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.630 mi.) 65 217 EPA ID:: CAD097577035 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there are 3 RCRA-LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CIRTECH INC 250 EAST EMERSON AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) G28 67 EPA ID:: CAD981388655 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HIGHTOWER PLATING AN 2090 NORTH GLASSELL WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) E22 43 EPA ID:: CAD009521089 BURLINGTON ENGINEERI 220 WEST GROVE AVENU WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.186 mi.) 30 92 EPA ID:: CAR000049858 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there are 10 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FINE FINISH SASH AND 227 E MEATS AVE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.128 mi.) C16 22 EPA ID:: CAD981387921 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BASF CORP 210 E MEATS AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.047 mi.) A1 8 EPA ID:: CAD131842445 MERCO MFG CO 1927 GLASSEL ST WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.121 mi.) D15 21 EPA ID:: CAD983601147 RICKS TRUCKWORKS 1962 N GLASSELL ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) D17 24 EPA ID:: CAR000017210 HONEYCUTT TEAR OFF 2163 N GLASSELL ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.170 mi.) 27 65 EPA ID:: CA0000371278 CENTURY INDEX CORP 1870 N GLASSELL ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) 29 90 EPA ID:: CAD983661166 CABLESCAN INC 145 E EMERSON NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) I35 109 EPA ID:: CAD051977098 FEDEX FREIGHT ONG 310 W GROVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) J38 114 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 EPA ID:: CAD983650680 MARBIL INDUSTRIES IN 2201 N GLASSELL ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) I40 132 EPA ID:: CAR000197079 RONEL ENTERPRISES 2207 N GLASSELL ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.241 mi.) I41 136 EPA ID:: CAD981391246 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL CA RESPONSE: Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. A review of the CA RESPONSE list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CA RESPONSE site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CONTINENTAL MOLDING 1841 N. BATAVIA STRE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.632 mi.) 66 232 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Status: Certified Facility Id: 30240011 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS CA ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the CA ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/30/2018 has revealed that there are 11 CA ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CIRTECH INC 250 EAST EMERSON AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) G28 67 Facility Id: 71002789 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SUMMIT INTERCONNECT 230 BRISTOL LN NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) I42 138 Facility Id: 71002927 Status: Refer: Local Agency CONTINUOUS COATING C 520 W. GROVE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.383 mi.) 52 168 Facility Id: 71002438 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Status: No Action Required CIRCUIT CONNECTION I 1739 N. CASE ST SW 1/2 - 1 (0.517 mi.) Q62 194 Facility Id: 71002406 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation ULTRA-PURE METAL FIN 1764 CASE ST WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.520 mi.) Q63 200 Facility Id: 71002846 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation VAN DOREN RUBBER CO, 2095 NORTH BATAVIA W 1/2 - 1 (0.622 mi.) 64 215 Facility Id: 30340167 Status: Refer: Other Agency ORANGE PRECISION CIR 812 SOUTHERN AVE WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.630 mi.) 65 217 Facility Id: 30360250 Facility Id: 80001732 Status: Refer: RCRA Status: No Further Action CONTINENTAL MOLDING 1841 N. BATAVIA STRE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.632 mi.) 66 232 Facility Id: 30240011 Status: Certified FXI, INC. 2060 NORTH BATAVIA W 1/2 - 1 (0.746 mi.) R67 235 Facility Id: 30280027 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only FXI INC 2060 N BATAVIA ST W 1/2 - 1 (0.746 mi.) R68 244 Facility Id: 80001567 Status: * Inactive COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1465 N. BATAVIA STRE SW 1/2 - 1 (0.888 mi.) 69 280 Facility Id: 30000046 Status: Inactive - Withdrawn State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists CA SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste Management Board’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database. A review of the CA SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CA SWF/LF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WASTE MANAGEMENT OF 2050 NORTH GLASSELL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) F23 62 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 08/08/2018 Database: LOS ANGELES CO. LF, Date of Government Version: 10/15/2018 Facility ID: 30-AB-0363 Site ID: 2325 Status: Active Operational Status: Active Regulation Status: Permitted EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists CA LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the CA LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 21 CA LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 ORANGE OLIVE RD N 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) C10 15 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605900239 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE N 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) C12 17 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900239 ORANGE POST OFFICE 1075 N TAFT SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.496 mi.) 61 193 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605999124 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANILLO COMPANY 2090 GLASSELL ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) E20 28 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901485 HIGHTOWER PLATING & 2090 N GLASSELL BLVD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) E21 29 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901485 FEDEX FREIGHT ONG 310 W GROVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) J38 114 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605901123 Global ID: T0605901123 HAMILTON MATERIALS I 345 W MEATS AV WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) K43 141 Database: ORANGE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 07/13/2018 Facility Id: 02UT016 WESTPAC MATERIALS 345 W MEATS AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) K44 145 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605900139 Global ID: T0605900139 AIR CABIN ENGINEERIN 231 W BLUERIDGE AVE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.280 mi.) L45 156 Database: ORANGE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 07/13/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Facility Id: 97UT044 FORMER SANTIAGO HEAT 231 BLUERIDGE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.284 mi.) L46 158 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605902100 Global ID: T0605902100 STRAUB DISTRIBUTING 410 GROVE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.304 mi.) M48 160 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605902068 STRAUB FAMILY TRUST 410 W GROVE AV W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.319 mi.) M49 161 Database: ORANGE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 07/13/2018 Facility Id: 97UT046 THOMPSON BUILDING MA 141 W TAFT AVE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.350 mi.) 50 165 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605902324 THOMPSON BUILDING MA 141 TAFT AVE SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.370 mi.) 51 167 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605902324 COCA COLA BOTTLING C 700 W GROVE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.461 mi.) N53 169 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901952 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISE 700 GROVE AVE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.480 mi.) N55 183 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901952 DESERT PETROLEUM SS 2440 N GLASSELL ST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) O56 184 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901372 DESERT PETROLEUM SS 2440 GLASSELL ST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) O57 186 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901372 RSA SOIL PRODUCTS, I 701 W GROVE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.494 mi.) N58 187 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901916 RICK HAMM CONSTRUCTI 2314 PACIFIC ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.495 mi.) P59 190 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605999277 RICK HAMM CONSTRUCTI 2314 N PACIFIC NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.495 mi.) P60 191 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605999277 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 State and tribal registered storage tank lists CA UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the CA UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 CA UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE OLIVE ARCO 2101 ORANGE OLIVE RO N 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) C11 16 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Facility Id: 30-030-800067 ORANGE OLIVE GASOLIN 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE N 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) C14 20 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Facility Id: FA0036493 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE RESOURCE RECO 2050 N. GLASSELL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) F24 64 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Facility Id: 30-030-800070 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF 2050 N GLASSELL ST W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) F26 65 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Facility Id: FA0026139 CA AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the CA AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 CA AST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE FIRE STATION 1910 N SHAFFER ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.087 mi.) B4 11 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Not reported 1910 SHAFFER ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.087 mi.) B5 12 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 218 E MEATS AVE NW 0 - 1/8 (0.067 mi.) A2 10 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 CA HIST Cal-Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. A review of the CA HIST Cal-Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there is 1 CA HIST Cal-Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CONTINENTAL MOLDING 1841 N. BATAVIA STRE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.632 mi.) 66 232 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the CA SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 3 CA SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF ORANGE FIRE 1910 N SHAFFER SE 0 - 1/8 (0.087 mi.) B3 11 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 2624 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE N 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) C12 17 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 800067 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE RESOURCE RECY 2050 N GLASSELL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) F25 64 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 800070 CA HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the CA HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 10 CA HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FIRE STATION 3 1910 N SHAFFER ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.087 mi.) B6 13 Facility Id: 00000002624 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 ORANGE OLIVE R N 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) C9 14 Facility Id: 00000057689 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANILLO INDUSTRIES, I 2090 N GLASSELL ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) E18 26 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 Facility Id: 00000056592 HIGHTOWER METAL PROD 2090 N GLASSELL ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) E19 26 Facility Id: 00000021280 HIGHTOWER PLATING & 2090 N GLASSELL BLVD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) E21 29 C S MATTRESS 1821 N GLASSELL SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) H32 106 Facility Id: 00000048457 LIQUINOX COMPANY 221 W MEATS AVENUE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.225 mi.) 34 108 Facility Id: 00000028616 ANR FRIEGHT TERMINAL 310 WEST GROVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) J36 111 RYDER/PIE NATIONWIDE 310 W GROVE AVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) J37 114 Facility Id: 00000035997 RYDER PIG 310 W GROVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) J39 131 Facility Id: 00000047931 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 4 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY OF ORANGE FIRE 1910 N SHAFFER SE 0 - 1/8 (0.087 mi.) B3 11 Facility Id: 30017897 Status: A ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 ORANGE OLIVE R N 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) C8 14 Facility Id: 30017909 Status: A PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PREFERRED AUTO BODY 1821 N GLASSELL SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) H33 107 Facility Id: 30002652 Status: A LIQUINOX COMPANY 221 W MEATS AVENUE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.225 mi.) 34 108 Facility Id: 30004551 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ APPLIED FRICTION TEC 230 E EMERSON AVE ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.194 mi.) G31 105 EPA ID:: CAD982442592 CA HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the CA HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 7 CA HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 ORANGE OLIVE RD N 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) C10 15 Reg Id: 083000304T PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANILLO COMPANY 2090 GLASSELL ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) E20 28 Reg Id: 083001985T FEDEX FREIGHT ONG 310 W GROVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) J38 114 Reg Id: 083001477T WESTPAC MATERIALS 345 W MEATS AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.) K44 145 Reg Id: 083000183T STRAUB DISTRIBUTION 410 W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.304 mi.) M47 160 Reg Id: 083003033T COCA-COLA ENTERPRISE 700 GROVE AVE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.480 mi.) N55 183 Reg Id: 083002846T DESERT PETROLEUM SS 2440 GLASSELL ST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) O57 186 Reg Id: 083001834T CA HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the CA HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/20/2018 has revealed that there are 2 CA HWP sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE PRECISION CIR 812 SOUTHERN AVE WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.630 mi.) 65 217 EPA Id: CAD097577035 Cleanup Status: CLOSED FXI INC 2060 N BATAVIA ST W 1/2 - 1 (0.746 mi.) R68 244 EPA Id: CAD008352361 Cleanup Status: PROTECTIVE FILER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 RI MANIFEST: Hazardous waste manifest information A review of the RI MANIFEST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RI MANIFEST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CIRTECH INC 250 EAST EMERSON AVE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.175 mi.) G28 67 EPA Id: CAD981388655 Manifest Document Number: RIH0018379 CA PROC: A listing of certified processors. A review of the CA PROC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/10/2018 has revealed that there are 2 CA PROC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE RESOURCE RECY 2050 N GLASSELL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) F25 64 Cert Id: PR18883.001 Reg Id: 18883 SA RECYCLING 2411 N GLASSEL ST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.475 mi.) O54 183 Cert Id: PR153938.001 Reg Id: 153938 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR Hist Auto sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ NATES ARCO AUTOCARE 2101 ORANGE-OLIVE RD N 0 - 1/8 (0.095 mi.) C7 13 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CA 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE N 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) C13 19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5509310.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ CA CDL EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 kV 361201 6 02 0 0 2 80 2 8 0200200200 200240240240280 280320 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 3 NR NR NR 3 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 10 NR NR NR 8 2 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000CA RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 11 NR 8 1 2 0 1.000CA ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 1 NR NR 0 1 0 0.500CA SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 21 NR NR 16 3 2 0.500CA LUST TC5509310.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA CPS-SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 4 NR NR NR 2 2 0.250CA UST 3 NR NR NR 0 3 0.250CA AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000CA HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA CERS HAZ WASTE 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 3 NR NR NR 1 2 0.250CA SWEEPS UST 10 NR NR NR 8 2 0.250CA HIST UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA CERS TANKS 4 NR NR NR 2 2 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 TC5509310.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA Orange Co. Industrial Site 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA CUPA Listings TC5509310.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA ICE 7 NR NR 4 2 1 0.500CA HIST CORTESE 2 NR 2 0 0 0 1.000CA HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA HWT 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RI MANIFEST 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA NPDES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA PEST LIC 2 NR NR 1 1 0 0.500CA PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA UIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CA WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA WDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA CERS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA WIP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA CIWQS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA SAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA OTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA WELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA MILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA PROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA UIC GEO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA PROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA NON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA WDR EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 2 NR NR NR NR 2 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CA RGA LUST 88 0 13 22 35 18 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5509310.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1987Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 973-245-6000Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932 100 PARK AVEOwner/operator address: BASF CORPOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1987Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: BASF CORPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: JOHN.ZOMER@BASF.COMContact email: 4418Telephone ext.: 714-921-1430Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 138 E MEATS AVEContact address: JOHN G ZOMERContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 138 E MEATS AVEMailing address: CAD131842445EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 210 E MEATS AVEFacility address: BASF CORPFacility name: 05/31/2012Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 247 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A 0.047 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 199 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92865 WNW TRIS210 E MEATS AVE 92665BSFCR210EM A1 RCRA-SQGBASF CORP 1000226857 TC5509310.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. Waste name: 141. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): BASF CORP (Continued)1000226857 TC5509310.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3 additional US_TRIS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access TRIS: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BASF CORPOR ORANGE PLANTSite name: 12/17/1985Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: BASF CORPOR ORANGE PLANTSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: BASF CORP (Continued)1000226857 Not reportedEPAID: Not reportedProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: Not reportedProperty Owner Stat : Not reportedProperty Owner City: Not reportedProperty Owner Mailing Address: Not reportedProperty Owner Phone: Not reportedProperty Owner Name: Not reportedOwner Country: Not reportedOwner Zip Code: Not reportedOwner State: Not reportedOwner Mail Address: Not reportedOwner Phone: Not reportedOperator Phone: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedMailing Address Zip Code: Not reportedMailing Address State: Not reportedMailing Address City: Not reportedMailing Address: Not reportedFax: Not reportedPhone: Not reportedBusiness Name: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedCERSID: 57,600Total Gallons: POLLARD - SWAIN INCOwner: OrangeCertified Unified Program Agencies: AST: 353 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A 0.067 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 201 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA NW 218 E MEATS AVE N/A A2 CA AST A100324707 TC5509310.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 637 W STRUCKMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7142882513Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00002624Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30017897Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-05-91Active Date: 750Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-002624-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 1Owner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 12-05-91Action Date: 12-05-91Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 4Number: 2624Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 459 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster B 0.087 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 SE CA FID UST1910 N SHAFFER N/A B3 CA SWEEPS USTCITY OF ORANGE FIRE STATION #3 S101589686 176 S Grand StreetMailing Address: Not reportedFax: 714-288-2500Phone: CITY OF ORANGE FIRE DEPT STA # 3Business Name: FA0051523Facility ID: 10563751CERSID: Not reportedTotal Gallons: City of OrangeOwner: Not reportedCertified Unified Program Agencies: AST: 459 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster B 0.087 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92865 SE 1910 N SHAFFER ST N/A B4 CA ASTORANGE FIRE STATION NO 3 A100423005 TC5509310.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEPAID: Not reportedProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: Not reportedProperty Owner Stat : Not reportedProperty Owner City: Not reportedProperty Owner Mailing Address: Not reportedProperty Owner Phone: Not reportedProperty Owner Name: United StatesOwner Country: 92866Owner Zip Code: CAOwner State: 300 E Chapman AvenueOwner Mail Address: 714-288-2500Owner Phone: 714-288-2500Operator Phone: Orange City Fire DepartmentOperator Name: 92866Mailing Address Zip Code: CAMailing Address State: OrangeMailing Address City: ORANGE FIRE STATION NO 3 (Continued) A100423005 Not reportedEPAID: Not reportedProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: Not reportedProperty Owner Stat : Not reportedProperty Owner City: Not reportedProperty Owner Mailing Address: Not reportedProperty Owner Phone: Not reportedProperty Owner Name: Not reportedOwner Country: Not reportedOwner Zip Code: Not reportedOwner State: Not reportedOwner Mail Address: Not reportedOwner Phone: Not reportedOperator Phone: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedMailing Address Zip Code: Not reportedMailing Address State: Not reportedMailing Address City: Not reportedMailing Address: Not reportedFax: Not reportedPhone: Not reportedBusiness Name: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedCERSID: 1,320Total Gallons: CITY OF ORANGE FIRE DEPT STA # 3Owner: OrangeCertified Unified Program Agencies: AST: 459 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster B 0.087 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA SE 1910 SHAFFER ST N/A B5 CA AST A100336811 TC5509310.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: 00000750Tank Capacity: 1963Year Installed: 14Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92666Owner City,St,Zip: 300 E. CHAPMAN AVE.Owner Address: CITY OF ORANGEOwner Name: 7145320288Telephone: DON BONTZContact Name: GOVERNMENTOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: 00000002624Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E7BB.pdfURL: 0002E7BBFile Number: HIST UST: 459 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster B 0.087 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 SE 1910 N SHAFFER ST N/A B6 CA HIST USTFIRE STATION 3 U001577486 Gasoline Service Stations1990 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1989 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1988 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1987 NATES ARCO AUTOCARE Gasoline Service Stations1987 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1986 NATES ARCO AUTOCARE Gasoline Service Stations1985 NATES ARCO AUTOCARE Gasoline Service Stations1983 NATES ARCO AUTOCARE Gasoline Service Stations1982 NATES ARCO AUTOCARE Gasoline Service Stations1977 MC KINNEY SHELBY F Gasoline Service Stations1976 MC KINNEY SHELBY F Gasoline Service Stations1974 MC KINNEY SHELBY F Gasoline Service Stations1973 MC KINNEY SHELBY F Gasoline Service Stations1972 MC KINNEY SHELBY F Gasoline Service Stations1971 MC KINNEY SHELBY F Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 503 ft. Site 1 of 9 in cluster C 0.095 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 North 2101 ORANGE-OLIVE RD N/A C7 EDR Hist AutoNATES ARCO AUTOCARE 1020273561 TC5509310.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 2101 ORANGE OLIVE R ORANGMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149747313Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00057689Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30017909Facility ID: CA FID UST: 503 ft. Site 2 of 9 in cluster C 0.095 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 North 2101 ORANGE OLIVE R ORANG N/A C8 CA FID USTORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE S101619674 REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92665Owner City,St,Zip: 2101 ORANGE OLIVE RDOwner Address: ORANGE OLIVE GAS AND REPAIR COOwner Name: 7149747313Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000057689Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EC6C.pdfURL: 0002EC6CFile Number: HIST UST: 503 ft. Site 3 of 9 in cluster C 0.095 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 North 2101 ORANGE OLIVE R ORANGE N/A C9 CA HIST USTORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE U001577496 TC5509310.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE (Continued) U001577496 Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 8/25/1987Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 4/7/1988Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 3/27/1987Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 4/17/1987Enter Date: 3/28/1987How Stopped Date: T0605900239Global ID: PipingLeak Source: CorrosionLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Inventory ControlHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: MEATSCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 100Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000304TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 503 ft. Site 4 of 9 in cluster C 0.095 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 North CA HIST CORTESE2101 ORANGE OLIVE RD N/A C10 CA LUSTORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE S104160906 TC5509310.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083000304TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: PIPING TO BE REPLACED.Summary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8505993Longitude: 33.823234Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 4/17/1987Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE (Continued) S104160906 -117.848912Longitude: 33.824654Latitude: ORANGE, CITY OFPermitting Agency: 30-030-800067Facility ID: UST: 503 ft. Site 5 of 9 in cluster C 0.095 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92865 North 2101 ORANGE OLIVE ROAD N/A C11 CA USTORANGE OLIVE ARCO U004061490 TC5509310.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 04/07/1988Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900239Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 03/28/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900239Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/27/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900239Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: r8 UNKNOWNCity: Not reportedAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: UNKContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900239Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900239Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083000304TRB Case Number: UNKCase Worker: 04/07/1988Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.850246Longitude: 33.823298Latitude: T0605900239Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605900239Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE, CITY OFLead Agency: LUST: 619 ft. Site 6 of 9 in cluster C 0.117 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 205 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 North CA SWEEPS UST2101 N ORANGE OLIVE RD N/A C12 CA LUSTORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE S106930171 TC5509310.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 800067Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 06-22-93Active Date: 5000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800067-000002SWRCB Tank Id: 800067Owner Tank Id: 06-22-93Created Date: 01-19-94Action Date: 06-22-93Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 800067Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 06-22-93Active Date: 5000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800067-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 800067Owner Tank Id: 06-22-93Created Date: 01-19-94Action Date: 06-22-93Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 800067Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 08/25/1987Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900239Global Id: 03/27/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900239Global Id: 04/07/1988Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900239Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 04/09/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900239Global Id: ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE (Continued) S106930171 TC5509310.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 06-22-93Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800067-000004SWRCB Tank Id: 800067Owner Tank Id: 06-22-93Created Date: 01-19-94Action Date: 06-22-93Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 800067Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 06-22-93Active Date: 5000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800067-000003SWRCB Tank Id: 800067Owner Tank Id: 06-22-93Created Date: 01-19-94Action Date: 06-22-93Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE (Continued) S106930171 General Automotive Repair Shops2002 GEORGE MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2001 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2001 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE General Automotive Repair Shops2000 R & J AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2000 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations2000 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations1999 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations1999 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1998 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations1997 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations1997 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1996 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1995 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1994 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1993 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1992 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations1991 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 619 ft. Site 7 of 9 in cluster C 0.117 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 205 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92665 North 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE RD N/A C13 EDR Hist AutoORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE 1021470172 TC5509310.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Automotive Repair Shops, NEC2014 BEACH CITIES AUTOMOTIVE Gasoline Service Stations2014 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2014 CHRIS CHAPPELL General Automotive Repair Shops2013 CAND H AUTO REPAIR General Automotive Repair Shops2013 CHRIS CHAPPELL Automotive Repair Shops, NEC2013 BEACH CITIES AUTOMOTIVE Gasoline Service Stations2013 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2012 CHRIS CHAPPELL General Automotive Repair Shops2012 CAND H AUTO REPAIR Automotive Repair Shops, NEC2012 BEACH CITIES AUTOMOTIVE Gasoline Service Stations2012 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2011 CAND H AUTO REPAIR Gasoline Service Stations2011 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2011 CHRIS CHAPPELL Automotive Repair Shops, NEC2011 BEACH CITIES AUTOMOTIVE Gasoline Service Stations2010 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2010 CAND H AUTO REPAIR General Automotive Repair Shops2009 CAND H AUTO REPAIR Gasoline Service Stations2009 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2008 CAND H AUTO REPAIR Gasoline Service Stations2008 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2008 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations2007 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2007 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE General Automotive Repair Shops2007 CAND H AUTO REPAIR Gasoline Service Stations2006 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE General Automotive Repair Shops2006 CAND H AUTO REPAIR Gasoline Service Stations2006 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2005 CAND H AUTO REPAIR Gasoline Service Stations2005 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2005 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations2004 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE General Automotive Repair Shops2004 GEORGE MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2004 I & B CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2003 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations2003 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2003 GEORGE MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2002 ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE Gasoline Service Stations2002 I & B CORPORATION General Automotive Repair Shops2002 GEORGE AUTO TECH ORANGE OLIVE AUTO CARE (Continued) 1021470172 -117.85026Longitude: 33.8233Latitude: Orange County Environmental HealthPermitting Agency: FA0036493Facility ID: UST: 619 ft. Site 8 of 9 in cluster C 0.117 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 205 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92865 North 2101 N ORANGE OLIVE RD N/A C14 CA USTORANGE OLIVE GASOLINE U004266097 TC5509310.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-5500Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 91665 1927 GLASSELOwner/operator address: MERCO MFG CO INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-637-5500Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92665 1927 GLASSELContact address: DARYL ROSSMANContact: CAD983601147EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 1927 GLASSEL STFacility address: MERCO MFG COFacility name: 08/13/1991Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 641 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster D 0.121 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. < 1/8 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 WSW FINDS1927 GLASSEL ST CAD983601147 D15 RCRA-SQGMERCO MFG CO 1000596151 TC5509310.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008282170DFR URL: 110008282170Registry ID: 1000596151Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110008282170Registry ID: FINDS: MERCO MFG CO (Continued)1000596151 ORANGE, CA 92665 227 E MEATS AVEOwner/operator address: FINE FINISHING SASH AND DOOR INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-637-0484Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92665 227 E MEATS AVEContact address: DON HILLMANContact: CAD981387921EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 227 E MEATS AVEFacility address: FINE FINISH SASH AND DOOR INCFacility name: 03/16/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 676 ft. Site 9 of 9 in cluster C 0.128 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 NNW FINDS227 E MEATS AVE CAD981387921 C16 RCRA-SQGFINE FINISH SASH AND DOOR INC 1000183051 TC5509310.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110008266973Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-0484Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: FINE FINISH SASH AND DOOR INC (Continued) 1000183051 TC5509310.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008266973DFR URL: 110008266973Registry ID: 1000183051Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. FINE FINISH SASH AND DOOR INC (Continued) 1000183051 NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-282-8930Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 627 GATES STOwner/operator address: RICHARD BENVENUTOOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-974-4949Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 1962 N GLASSELL STContact address: RICHARD BENVENUTOContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 PO BOX 3135Mailing address: CAR000017210EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 1962 N GLASSELL STFacility address: RICKS TRUCKWORKSFacility name: 01/06/1997Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 742 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D 0.141 mi.CA HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 WSW FINDS1962 N GLASSELL ST CAR000017210 D17 RCRA-SQGRICKS TRUCKWORKS 1001126655 TC5509310.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation .2085Tons: Treatment, TankDisposal Method: Tank bottom wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650135Mailing City,St,Zip: 1962 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149744949Telephone: RICHARD BENVENUTOContact: CAR000017210GEPAID: 1998Year: 1001126655envid: HAZNET: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002915604DFR URL: 110002915604Registry ID: 1001126655Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002915604Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: RICKS TRUCKWORKS (Continued)1001126655 TC5509310.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: RICKS TRUCKWORKS (Continued)1001126655 Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1967Year Installed: 1Container Num: 002Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 2Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92667Owner City,St,Zip: 2090 N. GLASSELL ST.Owner Address: ANILLO INDUSTRIES, INC.Owner Name: 7146377000Telephone: P.D. YEATS, GENERAL MANAGERContact Name: MANUFACTUREROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000056592Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 743 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster E 0.141 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 195 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92667 WNW 2090 N GLASSELL ST N/A E18 CA HIST USTANILLO INDUSTRIES, INC.U001577551 DON YEATSContact Name: METAL STAMPINGOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000021280Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E4E5.pdfURL: 0002E4E5File Number: HIST UST: 743 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster E 0.141 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 195 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92865 WNW CA WDS2090 N GLASSELL ST N/A E19 CA HIST USTHIGHTOWER METAL PRODUCTS INC U001577550 TC5509310.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7146379110Agency Telephone: TOM HORNEAgency Contact: ORANGE 928653391Agency City,St,Zip: 2090 GLASSELL STAgency Address: HIGHTOWER METAL PRODUCTS INCAgency Name: DON YEATSFacility Contact: 7146379110Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I011571Facility ID: WDS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: VisualLeak Detection: 10Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: 00000100Tank Capacity: 1978Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1967Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92667Owner City,St,Zip: 2090 NORTH GLASSELLOwner Address: ANILLO INDUSTRIES INC.Owner Name: 7149782826Telephone: HIGHTOWER METAL PRODUCTS INC (Continued) U001577550 TC5509310.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: HIGHTOWER METAL PRODUCTS INC (Continued) U001577550 12/19/1991Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 6/11/1992Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 11/21/1991Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 12/19/1991Enter Date: 11/14/1991How Stopped Date: T0605901485Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: MEATSCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001985TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 743 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster E 0.141 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 195 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92665 WNW CA HIST CORTESE2090 GLASSELL ST N/A E20 CA LUSTANILLO COMPANY S103641105 TC5509310.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083001985TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8533184Longitude: 33.822713Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 12/19/1991Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: ANILLO COMPANY (Continued)S103641105 Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083001985TRB Case Number: UNKCase Worker: 06/11/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.854038Longitude: 33.822456Latitude: T0605901485Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605901485Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE, CITY OFLead Agency: LUST: CA CIWQS 743 ft.CA NPDESSite 4 of 5 in cluster E 0.141 mi.CA HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 195 ft. 1/8-1/4 CA EMIORANGE, CA 92865 WNW CA HIST UST2090 N GLASSELL BLVD N/A E21 CA LUSTHIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/19/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901485Global Id: 11/14/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901485Global Id: 06/11/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901485Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 11/21/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901485Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 06/11/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901485Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 11/21/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901485Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 11/14/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901485Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: r8 UNKNOWNCity: Not reportedAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: UNKContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901485Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901485Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1.225NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .027Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .13Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .3243427285646612979Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2006Year: .0559394992Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .23828927Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .00045SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .2405NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .0262Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .161595154Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .23339Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2005Year: EMI: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E4E4.pdfURL: 0002E4E4File Number: HIST UST: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 30County Code: 2010Year: 7.5299660000000004E-2Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.37046400000000002Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 3.7800000000000003E-4SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.84999999999999998NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.02Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.91440999999999995Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2.1054452865940299Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3399SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2009Year: .245924279519024Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 1.26316971662325Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .000444SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.12NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .02Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .10827078416Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .2699960271929891046Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3399SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2008Year: .09747Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .485Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.225NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .027Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .13Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .3243427285646612979Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2007Year: .09747Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .485Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3399SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2013Year: 0.070562914427Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.3465582299Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00035SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.531NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.02042Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.42558Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3.1822883373Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3399SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2012Year: 0.076762045564Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.37607166505Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00034SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.10562NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.0201Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.77243Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.4019201464Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3399SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2011Year: 0.0802393Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.39712999999999998Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 3.4000000000000002E-4SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.99563000000000001NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 2.0240000000000001E-2Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.85275999999999996Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.8334006552843101Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3399SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 926670000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2090 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146379110Telephone: KURT KOCHContact: CAD009521089GEPAID: 2017Year: S108432081envid: HAZNET: 0.32643077057Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.3487120022Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.000291SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2.38NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.024985Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2.73087234Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3.0128101436Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2015Year: 0.3264906Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.34874Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00032SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2.25392NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.02691Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2.86505Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3.1838789718Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 103703Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2014Year: 0.069014098339Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.34624766835Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00033SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2.19365NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.0196Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2.65728Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 6.2444302617Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MXC130619001TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 926670000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2090 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146379110Telephone: KURT KOCHContact: CAD009521089GEPAID: 2017Year: S108432081envid: OrangeFacility County: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToMethod Decode: Liquids with cadmium >= 100 Mg./LCat Decode: 1.668Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Liquids with cadmium >= 100 Mg./LWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 926670000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2090 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146379110Telephone: KURT KOCHContact: CAD009521089GEPAID: 2017Year: S108432081envid: OrangeFacility County: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToMethod Decode: Other organic solidsCat Decode: 0.325Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 926670000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2090 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146379110Telephone: KURT KOCHContact: CAD009521089GEPAID: 2017Year: S108432081envid: OrangeFacility County: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToMethod Decode: Other inorganic solid wasteCat Decode: 5.3Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: Hightower Plating ManufacturingDischarge Name: 2090 N Glassell StDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/26/1995Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30NEC003335WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 208786Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: NPDES: 157 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethod Decode: Metal sludge (Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)Cat Decode: 13.4848Tons: Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposal Method: Metal sludge (Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)Waste Category: 99TSD County: AZD980735500TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 926670000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2090 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146379110Telephone: KURT KOCHContact: CAD009521089GEPAID: 2017Year: S108432081envid: OrangeFacility County: Blending) Energy Recovery At This Site--Use As Fuel(Includes On-Site FuelMethod Decode: Other organic solidsCat Decode: 0.95Tons: Blending) Energy Recovery At This Site--Use As Fuel(Includes On-Site FuelDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-637-9110Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: plating@anilloinc.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-637-9110Operator Contact Phone: Plating SupervisorOperator Contact Title: Bhupesh AminOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 2090 N Glassell StOperator Address: Hightower Plating ManufacturingOperator Name: plating@anilloinc.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-637-9110Contact Phone: Plating SupervisorContact Title: Bhupesh AminContact: SqFtPlace Size Unit: 172809Place Size: 06/26/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: 04/26/1995Processed Date: 06/26/2017Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30NEC003335WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208786Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 2090 N Glassell StDischarge Address: Hightower Plating ManufacturingDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/26/1995Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30NEC003335WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208786Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: 3469-Metal Stamping, NECSecondary Sic: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringPrimary Sic: 26-JUN-17Certification Date: Plating SupervisorCertifier Title: Bhupesh AminCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30NEC003335WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: plating@anilloinc.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-637-9110Operator Contact Phone: Plating SupervisorOperator Contact Title: Bhupesh AminOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 2090 N Glassell StOperator Address: Hightower Plating ManufacturingOperator Name: plating@anilloinc.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-637-9110Contact Phone: Plating SupervisorContact Title: Bhupesh AminContact: SqFtPlace Size Unit: 172809Place Size: 06/26/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: 04/26/1995Processed Date: 06/26/2017Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30NEC003335WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208786Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 2090 N Glassell StOperator Address: Hightower Plating ManufacturingOperator Name: 06/26/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 2090 N Glassell StDischarge Address: Hightower Plating ManufacturingDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/26/1995Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30NEC003335WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208786Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: 3469-Metal Stamping, NECSecondary Sic: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringPrimary Sic: 26-JUN-17Certification Date: Plating SupervisorCertifier Title: Bhupesh AminCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-637-9110Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8Region: MultipleSIC/NAICS: Coloring Industrial - Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, andPlace/Project Type: 2090 N Glassell St, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: Hightower Plating ManufacturingAgency: CIWQS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 TC5509310.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85305Longitude: 33.82273Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 04/26/1995Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30NEC003335WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CO (Continued) S108432081 HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING CO.Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: PLATING@ANILLOINC.COMContact email: 714-637-9110Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 NORTH GLASSELL STREETContact address: BHUPESH AMINContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 NORTH GLASSELL STREETMailing address: CAD009521089EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 2090 NORTH GLASSELL STREETFacility address: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANYFacility name: 02/25/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 743 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster E 0.141 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 195 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92865 WNW 2090 NORTH GLASSELL STREET CAD009521089 E22 RCRA-LQGHIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.). Waste name: 213. Waste code: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.). Waste name: 212. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Metal sludge (see 121). Waste name: 171. Waste code: Unspecified aqueous solution. Waste name: 135. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 06/28/1954Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING CO.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 06/28/1954Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-9110Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 NORTH GLASSELL STREETOwner/operator address: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with nickel > 134 mg/l. Waste name: 726. Waste code: Liquids with chromium (VI) > 500 mg/l. Waste name: 723. Waste code: Liquids with cadmium > 100 mg/l. Waste name: 722. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANYSite name: 03/01/2014Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS WHERE CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS. PLATING BATH RESIDUES FROM THE BOTTOM OF PLATING BATHS FROM. Waste name: F008. Waste code: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Metal sludge (see 121). Waste name: 171. Waste code: Unspecified aqueous solution. Waste name: 135. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATIONSite name: 03/15/2012Date form received by agency: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with nickel > 134 mg/l. Waste name: 726. Waste code: Liquids with cadmium > 100 mg/l. Waste name: 722. Waste code: Liquids with cyanides > 1000 mg/l. Waste name: 711. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 331. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Metal sludge (see 121). Waste name: 171. Waste code: Unspecified aqueous solution. Waste name: 135. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATIONSite name: 02/09/2010Date form received by agency: ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS WHERE CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS. PLATING BATH RESIDUES FROM THE BOTTOM OF PLATING BATHS FROM. Waste name: F008. Waste code: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with nickel > 134 mg/l. Waste name: 726. Waste code: Liquids with cadmium > 100 mg/l. Waste name: 722. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MANUFACTURING CORPSite name: 02/20/2008Date form received by agency: ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS WHERE CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS. PLATING BATH RESIDUES FROM THE BOTTOM OF PLATING BATHS FROM. Waste name: F008. Waste code: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MFG CORPSite name: 02/24/2006Date form received by agency: ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS WHERE CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS. PLATING BATH RESIDUES FROM THE BOTTOM OF PLATING BATHS FROM. Waste name: F008. Waste code: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPSite name: 02/08/2002Date form received by agency: ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS WHERE CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS. PLATING BATH RESIDUES FROM THE BOTTOM OF PLATING BATHS FROM. Waste name: F008. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COSite name: 03/08/2004Date form received by agency: ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS WHERE CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS. PLATING BATH RESIDUES FROM THE BOTTOM OF PLATING BATHS FROM. Waste name: F008. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: 930Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2017 Biennial Reports: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MFG CORPSite name: 08/15/1980Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ANILLO IND.,INC. DBA HIGHTOWERSite name: 02/21/1995Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ANILLO IND.,INC.DBA HIGHTOWER PLATINGSite name: 02/27/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MFG CORPSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MFG CORPSite name: 03/31/1998Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MFG. COSite name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HIGHTOWER PLATING & MFG. CO.Site name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TSD - General Facility StandardsArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/22/2003 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/22/2004Date achieved compliance: 01/22/2003Date violation determined: TSD - General Facility StandardsArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 01/27/2010Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 45620Amount (Lbs): ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPTWaste name: F006Waste code: 18655Amount (Lbs): CHROMIUMWaste name: D007Waste code: 4170Amount (Lbs): CADMIUMWaste name: D006Waste code: 6255Amount (Lbs): DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/15/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.30-34.CRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 11/15/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/11/2003 Enforcement action date: LETTER OF INTENT TO INITIATE ENFORCEMENT ACTION Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/22/2004Date achieved compliance: 01/22/2003Date violation determined: TSD - General Facility StandardsArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/22/2004Date achieved compliance: 01/22/2003Date violation determined: TSD - General Facility StandardsArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 162500 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 07/08/2004 Enforcement action date: SINGLE SITE CA/FO Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/22/2004Date achieved compliance: 01/22/2003Date violation determined: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 11/15/1993Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: F - 268.7Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 11/15/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 11/15/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.20-23.BRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: 253300 Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/08/1994 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.20-23.BRegulation violated: 95000 Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/30/1997 Enforcement action date: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: F - 268 ALLRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: 253300 Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/08/1994 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.30-34.CRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: 253300 Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/08/1994 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/28/2016Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: 95000 Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/30/1997 Enforcement action date: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.30-34.CRegulation violated: 95000 Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/30/1997 Enforcement action date: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.20-23.BRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: 253300 Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/08/1994 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: 09/28/1993Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: F - 268 ALLRegulation violated: 95000 Paid penalty amount: 94000 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/30/1997 Enforcement action date: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 02/07/2012Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/15/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/06/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/07/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/20/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/25/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/04/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/05/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/06/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/21/2016Evaluation date: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/22/2004Date achieved compliance: TSD - General Facility StandardsArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/22/2003Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/29/2003Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: NOT A SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIEREvaluation: 02/22/2004Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/28/2005Evaluation date: LocalEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/26/2006Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/25/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/29/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/27/2010Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/09/2011Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 TC5509310.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPAEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/07/1981Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/28/1993Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 09/29/1998Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/28/1993Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIEREvaluation: 11/15/1993Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/10/1993Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: NOT A SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIEREvaluation: 09/29/1998Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIEREvaluation: 01/22/2003Evaluation date: HIGHTOWER PLATING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) 1000244299 7144802333Operator Phone: USA Waste Of California, Inc.Operator: ActiveOperational Status: Villa Park, CA 92861Owner City,St,Zip: 10401 Carmel DriveOwner Address2: Not reportedOwner Address: 7146377970Owner Telephone: Hambarian PropertiesOwner Name: 33.82155 / -117.8543Lat/Long: 30-AB-0363Facility ID: SWF/LF (SWIS): 832 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster F 0.158 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92865 West 2050 NORTH GLASSELL AVENUE N/A F23 CA SWF/LFWASTE MANAGEMENT OF ORANGE TRANSFER STATION S102361456 TC5509310.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12 TIDE LINE BLUFFOwner Address: Hambarian PropertiesOwner Name: jgonzal6@wm.comOperator Email: (626) 334-0719Operator Telephone: Jesus GonzalesOperator Contact: Glendale, CA 91206Operator City/State/Zip: 633 E Broadway Room 209Operator Address: USA Waste of California, Inc.Operator Name: Detail As Of 01/2014: Not reportedDisposal Area (Acre): Monday - Friday 7 am - 5 pm; Saturday 6 am - 2 pmHours of Operation: Construction & Demolition;Green Materials;Household Trash;Industrial Non-Hazardous;Waste Accepted: ActiveStatus: Not reportedRemaining Capacity(Million): Transfer/Processing FacilityPresent Use: 1500Permitted Capacity: Not reportedMaximun Depth Fill(Ft): County of Orange Health Care AgencyLocal Enforcement Agency: Not reportedEnding Operation Date: 4-Sep-96Beginning Operation Date: 30-AB-0363Site SWIS Number: Out-of-County FacilitySite Type: http://www.wmorangecounty.com/services/transfer.aspSite Website: Not reportedSite Email: (714) 480-2315Site Contact Phone: Not reportedSite Contact: Not reportedAlt. Address: 2325Site ID: LOS ANGELES CO. LF: 33.82155 / -117.8543Lat/Long: Tons/dayRemaining Capacity with Units: Not reportedRemaining Capacity: 1880Permitted Capacity with Units: Tons/dayActual Throughput with Units: 1500Permitted Throughput with Units: Not reportedProgram Type: Not reportedWaste Discharge Requirement Num: 30-AB-0363SWIS Num: Not reportedDisposal Acreage: Not reportedClosure Type: Not reportedClosure Date: Construction/demolition,Food Wastes,Mixed municipalAccepted Waste: MonthlyInspection Frequency: 01Unit Number: Transfer/ProcessingCategory: MapGIS Source: Not reportedLanduse Name: PermittedRegulation Status: Large Volume Transfer/Proc FacilityActivity: 3Permitted Acreage: PermittedPermit Status: 03/30/2017Permit Date: Orange, CA 92865Operator City,St,Zip: 2050 N. Glassell StreetOperator Address2: Not reportedOperator Address: WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ORANGE TRANSFER STATION (Continued) S102361456 TC5509310.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner Email: (714) 637-7970Owner Telephone: Not reportedOwner Contact: NEWPORT BEACH, ca 92657Owner City/State/Zip: WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ORANGE TRANSFER STATION (Continued) S102361456 -117.852566Longitude: 33.8229489Latitude: ORANGE, CITY OFPermitting Agency: 30-030-800070Facility ID: UST: 832 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster F 0.158 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92865 West 2050 N. GLASSELL N/A F24 CA USTORANGE RESOURCE RECOVERY SYSTEM U004061491 YAluminium: 10/13/2012Operation Begin Date: N/ARural: (714) 450-4357Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: Not reportedWebsite: 60673Mailing Zip Code: ILMailing State: ChicagoMailing City: P O Box 73356Mailing Address: Waste Management of OrangeOrganization Name: 18883Organization Id: PR18883.001Cert Id: 18883Reg Id: PROC: 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 03-02-94Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800070-800070SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 03-02-94Created Date: 03-02-94Action Date: 03-02-94Referral Date: 44-035735Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 800070Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 832 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster F 0.158 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92665 West CA PROC2050 N GLASSELL N/A F25 CA SWEEPS USTORANGE RESOURCE RECYCLING S104577451 TC5509310.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Mon - Fri 6:00 am - 5:00 pm; Sat 6:00 am - 2:00 pm; Sun ClosedHours of Operation: NBimetal: YPlastic: YGlass: ORANGE RESOURCE RECYCLING (Continued) S104577451 -117.85391Longitude: 33.8216Latitude: Orange County Environmental HealthPermitting Agency: FA0026139Facility ID: UST: 832 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster F 0.158 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92865 West 2050 N GLASSELL ST N/A F26 CA USTWASTE MANAGEMENT OF ORANGE COUNTY U004264329 Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-974-8636Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92665 2163 N GLASSELL STOwner/operator address: JOHN HONEYCUTTOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-974-8636Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92665 2163 N GLASSELL STContact address: RICK MAC LEANContact: CA0000371278EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 2163 N GLASSELL STFacility address: HONEYCUTT TEAR OFFFacility name: 06/16/1994Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 899 ft. 0.170 mi.CA HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 200 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 NNW FINDS2163 N GLASSELL ST CA0000371278 27 RCRA-SQGHONEYCUTT TEAR OFF 1000905218 TC5509310.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCat Decode: .0625Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ORANGE, CA 928653307Mailing City,St,Zip: 2163 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149748636Telephone: JOHN HONEYCUTTContact: CA0000371278GEPAID: 1999Year: 1000905218envid: HAZNET: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008258660DFR URL: 110008258660Registry ID: 1000905218Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008258660Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: HONEYCUTT TEAR OFF (Continued) 1000905218 TC5509310.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .0417Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ORANGE, CA 928653307Mailing City,St,Zip: 2163 N GLASSELL STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149748636Telephone: JOHN HONEYCUTTContact: CA0000371278GEPAID: 1998Year: 1000905218envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: HONEYCUTT TEAR OFF (Continued) 1000905218 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: JMARTINEZ@CIRTECH.COMContact email: 243Telephone ext.: 714-921-0860Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 EAST EMERSON AVEContact address: JUAN P MARTINEZContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 EAST EMERSON AVEMailing address: CAD981388655EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 250 EAST EMERSON AVEFacility address: CIRTECH INCFacility name: 02/22/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: CA CIWQS CA WDS CA NPDES 922 ft.RI MANIFESTSite 1 of 2 in cluster G 0.175 mi.RAATS Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. 1/8-1/4 TRISORANGE, CA 92865 North CA ENVIROSTOR250 EAST EMERSON AVE 92665CVTCH250EA G28 RCRA-LQGCIRTECH INC 1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Metal sludge (see 121). Waste name: 171. Waste code: for a list of metals) Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see waste code 121. Waste name: 132. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1970Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: BRAD REESEOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1970Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-921-0860Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 EAST EMERSON AVEOwner/operator address: BRAD REESEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INCSite name: 03/01/2014Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.). Waste name: 212. Waste code: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see waste code 121. Waste name: 132. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INCSite name: 03/01/2010Date form received by agency: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INC.Site name: 10/31/2012Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INCSite name: 02/27/2008Date form received by agency: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2 with metals. Waste name: 792. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.). Waste name: 212. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Metal sludge (see 121). Waste name: 171. Waste code: for a list of metals) CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 343. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Metal sludge (see 121). Waste name: 171. Waste code: for a list of metals) Aqueous solution w/metals (< restricted levels and see waste code 121. Waste name: 132. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INC.Site name: 02/20/2006Date form received by agency: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INCSite name: 01/26/2004Date form received by agency: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Unspecified organic liquid mixture. Waste name: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2017 Biennial Reports: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH, INCSite name: 02/18/1986Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INC.Site name: 03/23/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECHSite name: 03/31/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INC.Site name: 05/26/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH, INCSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH, INC.Site name: 03/16/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH, INC.Site name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRTECH INCSite name: 02/20/2002Date form received by agency: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/11/2009 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/30/2009Date achieved compliance: 03/11/2009Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 06/07/2010Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 5280Amount (Lbs): ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPTWaste name: F006Waste code: 1820Amount (Lbs): LEADWaste name: D008Waste code: 41600Amount (Lbs): DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: 200Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 7630 Final penalty amount: 11400 Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/14/1993 Enforcement action date: FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 06/25/1992Date achieved compliance: 06/25/1992Date violation determined: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/11/2006 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/08/2006Date achieved compliance: 05/11/2006Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/20/2006 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 01/22/2007Date achieved compliance: 11/20/2006Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 06/19/2007Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/07/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/14/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/15/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/07/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/01/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/07/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/23/2016Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/08/2017Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: 7630 Paid penalty amount: 11400 Final penalty amount: 11400 Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/28/1992 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 06/25/1992Date achieved compliance: 06/25/1992Date violation determined: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/19/2007Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 06/30/2009Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/11/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/11/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/30/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/07/2010Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/28/2011Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/22/2012Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/14/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 11/04/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4Acres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 05/19/2015Status Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002789Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 06/25/1992Date achieved compliance: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 05/04/1992Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/16/1994Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/28/2003Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/06/2005Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONEvaluation: 06/08/2005Evaluation date: LocalEvaluation lead agency: 06/08/2006Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/11/2006Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 01/22/2007Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 11/20/2006Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/22/2007Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTSDF Date: GWT/Vol Units: 55Qty: ADVANCED CHEMICAL CO INCTSDF Name: RID059735761TSDF Id: CYANDIEWaste Description: RIH0018379Manifest Document Number: 2/22/2002GEN Cert Date: CAD981388655EPA Id: RI MANIFEST: 2 additional US_TRIS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access TRIS: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002789Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000480113Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD981388655Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8508Longitude: 33.82414Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Robert SengaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFiling Date: GWT/Vol Units: Not reportedTransporter Contact Email: 55Quantity: Not reportedTransporter Contact Name: CYANDIEWaste Description: Not reportedQuarter: RIH0018379Manifest Docket Number: CAD981388655EPA ID: Not reportedYear: Not reportedCompany Permit Number: Not reportedTransporter Name 2: RID059735761TSDF Id: ADVANCED CHEMICAL CO INCTSDF Name: Not reportedFee Exempt Code: Not reportedComment: Not reportedWaste Code6: Not reportedWaste Code5: Not reportedWaste Code4: Not reportedWaste Code3: D003Waste Code2: F007Waste Code1: Not reportedContainer Type: 0Number Of Containers: Not reportedTransporter Receipt Date: RI MANIFEST: Not reportedManifest Updated Date: Not reportedManifest Created Date: Not reportedFee: Not reportedFacility Receipt Date: Not reportedPaid Time: Not reportedPaid Date: Not reportedBilling Name: Not reportedTotal Fee: Not reportedFiling Date: Not reportedTransporter Contact Email: Not reportedTransporter Contact Name: Not reportedQuarter: Not reportedYear: Not reportedCompany Permit Number: Not reportedTransporter Name 2: Not reportedComment: Not reportedFee Exempt Code: Not reportedWaste Code6: Not reportedWaste Code5: Not reportedWaste Code4: Not reportedWaste Code3: D003Waste Code2: F007Waste Code1: Not reportedContainer Type: 0Number Of Containers: Not reportedTransporter Receipt Date: NYD980769947Transporter EPAID: HAZMAT ENV GROUP INCTransporter Name 2: Not reportedTransporter 2 Name: 1Item Number: Not reportedTransporter 2 Id: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedManifest Updated Date: Not reportedTransporter 2 ID: Not reportedTSDF Receipt Date: Not reportedManifest Created Date: Not reportedTransporter 2 Receipt Date: Not reportedFee: Not reportedFacility Receipt Date: 2/22/2002GEN Cert Date: Not reportedTime Paid: Not reportedDate Paid: NYD980769947Transporter EPA ID: Not reportedBilling Name: HAZMAT ENV GROUP INCTransporter Name: 1Item Number: Not reportedTotal Fee: Not reportedFiling Date: GWT/Vol Units: Not reportedTransporter Contact Email: 55Quantity: Not reportedTransporter Contact Name: CYANDIEWaste Description: Not reportedQuarter: RIH0018379Manifest Docket Number: CAD981388655EPA ID: Not reportedYear: Not reportedCompany Permit Number: Not reportedTransporter Name 2: RID059735761TSDF Id: ADVANCED CHEMICAL CO INCTSDF Name: Not reportedFee Exempt Code: Not reportedComment: Not reportedWaste Code6: Not reportedWaste Code5: Not reportedWaste Code4: Not reportedWaste Code3: D003Waste Code2: F007Waste Code1: Not reportedContainer Type: 0Number Of Containers: Not reportedTransporter Receipt Date: Not reportedManifest Updated Date: Not reportedTransporter 2 ID: Not reportedTSDF Receipt Date: Not reportedManifest Created Date: Not reportedTransporter 2 Receipt Date: Not reportedFee: Not reportedFacility Receipt Date: 2/22/2002GEN Cert Date: Not reportedTime Paid: Not reportedDate Paid: NYD980769947Transporter EPA ID: Not reportedBilling Name: HAZMAT ENV GROUP INCTransporter Name: 1Item Number: Not reportedTotal Fee: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 714-921-0860Contact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Juan MartinezContact: SqFtPlace Size Unit: 32481Place Size: 04/02/1992Status Date: ActiveStatus: 04/02/1992Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I002919WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208325Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: CirtechDischarge Name: 250 E Emerson AveDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/02/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I002919WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 208325Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: NPDES: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8 30I002919WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208325Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 3672-Printed Circuit BoardsPrimary Sic: 22-MAY-15Certification Date: Environmental ManagerCertifier Title: Juan MartinezCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-921-0860Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: jmartinez@cirtech.comOperator Contact Email: 243Operator Contact Phone Ext: 714-921-0860Operator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Juan MartinezOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 250 E Emerson AveOperator Address: CirtechOperator Name: jmartinez@cirtech.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 250 E Emerson AveDischarge Address: CirtechDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/02/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I002919WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208325Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 250 E Emerson AveOperator Address: CirtechOperator Name: 04/02/1992Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I002919WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 3672-Printed Circuit BoardsPrimary Sic: 22-MAY-15Certification Date: Environmental ManagerCertifier Title: Juan MartinezCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-921-0860Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: jmartinez@cirtech.comOperator Contact Email: 243Operator Contact Phone Ext: 714-921-0860Operator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Juan MartinezOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 250 E Emerson AveOperator Address: CirtechOperator Name: jmartinez@cirtech.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-921-0860Contact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Juan MartinezContact: SqFtPlace Size Unit: 32481Place Size: 04/02/1992Status Date: ActiveStatus: 04/02/1992Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 250 E Emerson AveDischarge Address: CirtechDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/02/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I002919WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208325Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7149210860Agency Telephone: GORDON J SIMMONSAgency Contact: ORANGE 92865Agency City,St,Zip: 250 E EMERSON AVEAgency Address: REESE FRANKAgency Name: GORDON J SIMMONSFacility Contact: 7149210860Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I002919Facility ID: WDS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 TC5509310.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85142Longitude: 33.82462Latitude: 3Violations within 5 years: 3Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 04/02/1992Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I002919WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: 3672SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Printed Circuit BoardsPlace/Project Type: 250 E Emerson Ave, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: CirtechAgency: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher CIRTECH INC (Continued)1000398155 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-921-1222Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92665 1870 N GLASSELLContact address: MIKE HANEYContact: CAD983661166EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 1870 N GLASSELL STFacility address: CENTURY INDEX CORPFacility name: 09/02/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 943 ft. 0.179 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 SW FINDS1870 N GLASSELL ST CAD983661166 29 RCRA-SQGCENTURY INDEX CORP 1000820093 TC5509310.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110008284766Registry ID: 1000820093Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008284766Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-921-1221Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92665 1870 N GLASSELLOwner/operator address: CENTURY INDEX CORPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous CENTURY INDEX CORP (Continued) 1000820093 TC5509310.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008284766DFR URL: CENTURY INDEX CORP (Continued) 1000820093 Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1997Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 220 WEST GROVE AVENUEOwner/operator address: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: KC@BURLINGTONENG.COMContact email: 714-921-4045Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: KAREN CORBELLContact: CAR000049858EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 220 WEST GROVE AVENUEFacility address: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.Facility name: 02/15/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 983 ft.CA CIWQS 0.186 mi.CA WDS Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. 1/8-1/4 CA NPDESORANGE, CA 92865 WSW CA EMI220 WEST GROVE AVENUE CAR000049858 30 RCRA-LQGBURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1997Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Not Defined. Waste name: D000. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INCSite name: 03/08/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.Site name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INCSite name: 02/12/2002Date form received by agency: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INCSite name: 02/23/2004Date form received by agency: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.Site name: 02/20/2006Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS WHERE CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS. PLATING BATH RESIDUES FROM THE BOTTOM OF PLATING BATHS FROM. Waste name: F008. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateViolation lead agency: 07/31/2006Date achieved compliance: 06/07/2006Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 2500 Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: 08/17/2006 Enf. disp. status date: Action Satisfied (Case Closed) Enf. disposition status: 08/17/2006 Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 07/31/2006Date achieved compliance: 06/07/2006Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/07/2006 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 07/31/2006Date achieved compliance: 06/07/2006Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 05/28/2010Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2002Year: EMI: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 07/31/2006Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/28/2004Evaluation date: LocalEvaluation lead agency: 07/31/2006Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/07/2006Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/01/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/28/2010Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/02/2011Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 07/28/2004 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2006Year: .0498368Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .05108Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .00338SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .731NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .197Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2.21785342Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3.1903Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2005Year: 0.02Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.0258Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.0027SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.423NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.114Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2.44Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3.5131Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2004Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2003Year: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.12Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.53825999999999996Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.78922605310777205Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2009Year: .0472Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .05Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .002538SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .54NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .14Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.7282566Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2.492627999858416162Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2008Year: .04386Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .049Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .003SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .712NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .192Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.825Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2.647977826126639148Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2007Year: .04386Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .049Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .003SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .712NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .192Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.825Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2.647977826126639148Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2013Year: 0.0399596Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.04071Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00202SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.4394NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.1183Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.26094Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.3956905216Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2012Year: 0.0439436Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.04541Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00172SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.3744NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.1008Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.73989Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.0779960883Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2011Year: 4.1399999999999999E-2Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.04267Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1.6100000000000001E-3SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.34970000000000001NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 9.4149999999999998E-2Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.96779999999999999Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.4029879207559Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2010Year: 3.4355799999999999E-2Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 3.5529999999999999E-2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00215SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.46000000000000002NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/10/1997Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30NEC003937WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208902Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: Burlington Engineering IncDischarge Name: 220 West Grove AveDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 11/10/1997Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30NEC003937WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 208902Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: NPDES: 0.0349482Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.03689Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00184SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.3991NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.10745Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.15958Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.24856680947Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 1799SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113705Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 220 West Grove AveDischarge Address: Burlington Engineering IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 220 West Grove AveDischarge Address: Burlington Engineering IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 11/10/1997Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30NEC003937WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208902Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 220 West Grove AveOperator Address: Burlington Engineering IncOperator Name: 01/18/2018Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30NEC003937WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Santa Ana River 30I013499Facility ID: WDS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8 30NEC003937WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: MultipleSIC/NAICS: Coloring Industrial - Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, andPlace/Project Type: 220 West Grove Ave, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: Burlington Engineering IncAgency: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: 3398SIC Code 2: 3479SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7149214045Agency Telephone: BILL WELSHAgency Contact: ORANGE 92865Agency City,St,Zip: 220 W GROVE AVE.Agency Address: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INCAgency Name: BILL WELSHFacility Contact: 7149214045Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 TC5509310.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85425Longitude: 33.82102Latitude: 1Violations within 5 years: 1Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 11/10/1997Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) 1001481063 Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: ROBERT C BROOKSOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-921-2695Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92665 230 E EMERSON BContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD982442592EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 230 E EMERSON AVE STE BFacility address: APPLIED FRICTION TECHNIQUES INCFacility name: 05/10/1991Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1023 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster G 0.194 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 202 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 NNW FINDS230 E EMERSON AVE STE B CAD982442592 G31 RCRA NonGen / NLRAPPLIED FRICTION TECHNIQUES INC 1000593417 TC5509310.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008277961DFR URL: 110008277961Registry ID: 1000593417Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008277961Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: APPLIED FRICTION TECHNIQUES INC (Continued) 1000593417 00000048457Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E91E.pdfURL: 0002E91EFile Number: HIST UST: 1178 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster H 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 194 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92665 SSW 1821 N GLASSELL N/A H32 CA HIST USTC S MATTRESS U001577481 TC5509310.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00003000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90742Owner City,St,Zip: 29677 HIGHPOINT RDOwner Address: FRANK BRANNENOwner Name: 2135472781Telephone: FRANK BRANNENContact Name: PRIVATEOther Type: OtherFacility Type: C S MATTRESS (Continued)U001577481 .29417777569917328Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .2959109590116243576Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 7532SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 101040Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2008Year: EMI: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1821 N GLASSELLMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 2135472781Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00048457Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30002652Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1178 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster H 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 194 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92865 SSW CA EMI1821 N GLASSELL N/A H33 CA FID USTPREFERRED AUTO BODY & PAINT, F PILLARELL S101619673 TC5509310.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation .0096Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .01Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: PREFERRED AUTO BODY & PAINT, F PILLARELL (Continued) S101619673 ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 221 W MEATS AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146376300Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00028616Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30004551Facility ID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1970Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92665Owner City,St,Zip: 221 W. MEATS AVENUEOwner Address: LIQUINOX COMPANYOwner Name: 7146376300Telephone: HAP GARNERContact Name: FERTILIZER MFG.Other Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000028616Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EADB.pdfURL: 0002EADBFile Number: HIST UST: 1189 ft. 0.225 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92665 WNW CA FID UST221 W MEATS AVENUE N/A 34 CA HIST USTLIQUINOX COMPANY 1000590041 TC5509310.2s Page 108 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: CABLESCAN INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD051977098EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 145 E EMERSONFacility address: CABLESCAN INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1198 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster I 0.227 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 200 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 NNW FINDS145 E EMERSON CAD051977098 I35 RCRA-SQGCABLESCAN INC 1000281482 TC5509310.2s Page 109 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008262138DFR URL: 110008262138Registry ID: 1000281482Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource and settlements. regions and states with cooperative agreements, enforcement actions, Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The system tracks inspections in Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the NCDB (National Compliance Data Base) supports implementation of the Environmental Interest/Information System 110008262138Registry ID: FINDS: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/09/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CABLESCAN INCSite name: 08/18/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: CABLESCAN INC (Continued)1000281482 TC5509310.2s Page 110 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 77046Operator Zip: TexasOperator State: HoustonOperator City: 9 E Greenway PlzOperator Address: ANR Freight SystemsOperator Name: 05/27/1992Status Date: TerminatedStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I007014WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: NPDES: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002ED6E.pdfURL: 0002ED6EFile Number: HIST UST: 1207 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster J 0.229 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/8-1/4 CA CIWQSORANGE, CA 92665 West CA NPDES310 WEST GROVE N/A J36 CA HIST USTANR FRIEGHT TERMINAL S117694728 TC5509310.2s Page 111 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: 77046Operator Zip: TexasOperator State: HoustonOperator City: 9 E Greenway PlzOperator Address: ANR Freight SystemsOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 5Place Size: 05/27/1992Status Date: TerminatedStatus: 05/27/1992Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I007014WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208607Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: ANR FRIEGHT TERMINAL (Continued) S117694728 TC5509310.2s Page 112 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 05/27/1992Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I007014WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: 4231SIC/NAICS: Motor Freight Transportation Industrial - Terminal and Joint Terminal Maintenance Facilities forPlace/Project Type: 9 E Greenway Plz, Houston, TX 77046Agency Address: ANR Freight SystemsAgency: CIWQS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Freight Transportation 4231-Terminal and Joint Terminal Maintenance Facilities for MotorPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: T.b.d.Receiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: ANR FRIEGHT TERMINAL (Continued) S117694728 TC5509310.2s Page 113 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3-658Container Num: 003Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2-658Container Num: 002Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1-658Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: JACKSONVILLE, FL 32203Owner City,St,Zip: 2050 KINGS ROADOwner Address: RYDER/PIE NATIONWIDE, INC.Owner Name: 7149984120Telephone: CARL MILLERContact Name: TRUCK TERMINALOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000035997Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 1207 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster J 0.229 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92665 West 310 W GROVE AVE N/A J37 CA HIST USTRYDER/PIE NATIONWIDE, INC.U001577501 310 W GROVEFacility address: FEDEX FREIGHT ONGFacility name: 04/03/2017Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: CA CIWQS CA WDS CA NPDES 1207 ft.CA HIST CORTESESite 3 of 4 in cluster J 0.229 mi.ECHO Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/8-1/4 FINDSORANGE, CA 92865 West CA LUST310 W GROVE CAD983650680 J38 RCRA-SQGFEDEX FREIGHT ONG 1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 114 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/2000Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: FEDEX FREIGHT INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/2000Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 800-603-3828Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: HARRISON, AR 72601 FORWARD DROwner/operator address: FEDEX FREIGHT INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: STEVEN.CHANEY@FEDEX.COMContact email: 501-860-7904Contact telephone: USContact country: BENTON, AR 72015 ALCOA RDContact address: STEVEN CHANEYContact: BENTON, AR 72015 ALCOA RDMailing address: CAD983650680EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 115 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2 with metals. Waste name: 792. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2. Waste name: 791. Waste code: Detergent and soap. Waste name: 561. Waste code: Other empty containers 30 gallons or more. Waste name: 512. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Pharmaceutical waste. Waste name: 311. Waste code: Adhesives. Waste name: 281. Waste code: Pesticides and other waste associated with pesticide production. Waste name: 232. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.). Waste name: 213. Waste code: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.). Waste name: 212. Waste code: etc.) Halogenated solvents (chloroform, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,. Waste name: 211. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. Waste name: 141. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 116 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation U122. Waste code: METHANE, DICHLORO-. Waste name: U080. Waste code: METHANE, DIBROMO-. Waste name: U068. Waste code: ACETONE (I). Waste name: U002. Waste code: TRICHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D039. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: CRESOL. Waste name: D026. Waste code: 2,4-D. Waste name: D016. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 117 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 212. Waste code: etc.) Halogenated solvents (chloroform, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,. Waste name: 211. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. Waste name: 141. Waste code: Alkaline solution without metals (pH > 12.5). Waste name: 122. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: FEDEX FREIGHT INC ONGSite name: 10/11/2011Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ACETIC ACID, (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXY)-, SALTS & ESTERS. Waste name: U240. Waste code: BENZENE, DIMETHYL- (I,T). Waste name: U239. Waste code: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: BENZENE, METHYL-. Waste name: U220. Waste code: THIOUREA. Waste name: U219. Waste code: ETHENE, TETRACHLORO-. Waste name: U210. Waste code: METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (I). Waste name: U161. Waste code: 2-BUTANONE, PEROXIDE (R,T). Waste name: U160. Waste code: 2-BUTANONE (I,T). Waste name: U159. Waste code: METHANOL (I). Waste name: U154. Waste code: HYDRAZINE (R,T). Waste name: U133. Waste code: 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE (I). Waste name: U125. Waste code: FORMALDEHYDE. Waste name: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 118 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2. Waste name: 791. Waste code: Detergent and soap. Waste name: 561. Waste code: Photochemicals / photo processing waste. Waste name: 541. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Pharmaceutical waste. Waste name: 311. Waste code: Latex waste. Waste name: 291. Waste code: Adhesives. Waste name: 281. Waste code: Polymeric resin waste. Waste name: 272. Waste code: Pesticides and other waste associated with pesticide production. Waste name: 232. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.). Waste name: 213. Waste code: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.). Waste name: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 119 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 33.82094Latitude: T0605901123Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605901123Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE, CITY OFLead Agency: LUST: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: A N R FREIGHT SYSTEM INCSite name: 10/20/1992Date form received by agency: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: FEDEX NATIONAL LTLSite name: 10/29/2008Date form received by agency: ACETIC ACID, (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXY)-, SALTS & ESTERS. Waste name: U240. Waste code: METHANE, DICHLORO-. Waste name: U080. Waste code: TRICHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D039. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: SELENIUM. Waste name: D010. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 120 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/10/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901123Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 01/06/1992Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901123Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 11/10/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901123Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/24/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901123Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 10/22/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901123Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: r8 UNKNOWNCity: Not reportedAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: UNKContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901123Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901123Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083001477TRB Case Number: UNKCase Worker: 11/10/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.8553264Longitude: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 121 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8553264Longitude: 33.82094Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 2/11/1992Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 1/6/1992Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 11/10/1992Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 10/24/1991Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 10/24/1991Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 2/11/1992Enter Date: 10/22/1991How Stopped Date: T0605901123Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: GLASSELLCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001477TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 01/06/1992Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901123Global Id: 10/24/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901123Global Id: 10/22/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901123Global Id: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 122 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 01/14/2003Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I017748WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 209146Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: NPDES: 083001477TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008284249DFR URL: 110008284249Registry ID: 1000819101Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008284249Registry ID: FINDS: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 123 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: chong.lee@fedex.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 408-654-3112Operator Contact Phone: Manager Envrionmental ServicesOperator Contact Title: Chong LeeOperator Contact: 95054Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: Santa ClaraOperator City: 3405 Victor StOperator Address: FedEx Freight IncOperator Name: frank.valentin@fedex.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-637-9383Contact Phone: Service Center ManagerContact Title: Frank ValentinContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 4Place Size: 01/14/2003Status Date: ActiveStatus: 01/14/2003Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I017748WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 209146Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: FedEx Freight Inc ONGDischarge Name: 310 West GroveDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 124 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 95054Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: Santa ClaraDischarge City: 3405 Victor StDischarge Address: FedEx Freight IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 01/14/2003Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I017748WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 209146Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 4213-Trucking, Except LocalPrimary Sic: 13-MAY-15Certification Date: Service Center ManagerCertifier Title: Frank ValentinCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-637-9383Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 125 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 126 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CaliforniaOperator State: Santa ClaraOperator City: 3405 Victor StOperator Address: FedEx Freight IncOperator Name: frank.valentin@fedex.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-637-9383Contact Phone: Service Center ManagerContact Title: Frank ValentinContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 4Place Size: 01/14/2003Status Date: ActiveStatus: 01/14/2003Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I017748WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 209146Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 310 West GroveOperator Address: FedEx Freight Inc ONGOperator Name: 01/14/2003Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I017748WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 127 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FedEx Freight IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 01/14/2003Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I017748WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 209146Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 4213-Trucking, Except LocalPrimary Sic: 13-MAY-15Certification Date: Service Center ManagerCertifier Title: Frank ValentinCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-637-9383Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: chong.lee@fedex.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 408-654-3112Operator Contact Phone: Manager Envrionmental ServicesOperator Contact Title: Chong LeeOperator Contact: 95054Operator Zip: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 128 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 95054Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: Santa ClaraDischarge City: 3405 Victor StDischarge Address: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 129 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Industrial - Trucking, Except LocalPlace/Project Type: 310 West Grove, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: FedEx Freight Inc ONGAgency: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 8636874545Agency Telephone: HAL BROWERAgency Contact: LAKELAND 338045002Agency City,St,Zip: PO BOX 95002Agency Address: WATKINS MOTOR LINESAgency Name: JUAN GUTIERREZFacility Contact: 7146379346Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I017748Facility ID: WDS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 TC5509310.2s Page 130 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85536Longitude: 33.820146Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 01/14/2003Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I017748WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: 4213SIC/NAICS: FEDEX FREIGHT ONG (Continued)1000819101 NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 65802Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 65801Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: JACKSONVILLE, FL 32203Owner City,St,Zip: P.O. BX 2408Owner Address: RYDER PIG NW-CORP.Owner Name: 7149984120Telephone: CARL MILLERContact Name: TRUCK LINEOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000047931Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002ED6B.pdfURL: 0002ED6BFile Number: HIST UST: 1207 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster J 0.229 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92665 West 310 W GROVE N/A J39 CA HIST USTRYDER PIG U001577500 TC5509310.2s Page 131 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: RYDER PIG (Continued)U001577500 Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/01/2004Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HAMDEN LNOwner/operator address: ALLAN THOMSONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 04/01/1979Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: MARBIL INDUSTRIESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: WBTCM@YAHOO.COMContact email: 714-974-4032Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N GLASSELL STContact address: WILLIAM B THOMSONContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 N GLASSELL STMailing address: CAR000197079EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 2201 N GLASSELL STFacility address: MARBIL INDUSTRIES INCFacility name: 11/14/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1267 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster I 0.240 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 199 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92865 NNW CA HAZNET2201 N GLASSELL ST CAR000197079 I40 RCRA-SQGMARBIL INDUSTRIES INC 1012175897 TC5509310.2s Page 132 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2 with metals. Waste name: 792. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2. Waste name: 791. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/01/2004Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 JAVA ROADOwner/operator address: WILLIAM THOMSONOwner/operator name: MARBIL INDUSTRIES INC (Continued) 1012175897 TC5509310.2s Page 133 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2017Year: 1012175897envid: OrangeFacility County: Organics Recovery Ect Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,Method Decode: Oil/water separation sludgeCat Decode: 1.43865Tons: Organics Recovery Ect Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,Disposal Method: Oil/water separation sludgeWaste Category: Los AngelesTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 N. GLASSELL ST.Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149744032Telephone: WILLIAM THOMSONContact: CAR000197079GEPAID: 2017Year: 1012175897envid: HAZNET: No violations foundViolation Status: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: MARBIL INDUSTRIES INCSite name: 12/04/2008Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) MARBIL INDUSTRIES INC (Continued) 1012175897 TC5509310.2s Page 134 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1012175897envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.4587Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Liquids with pH <= 2 with metalsWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 N. GLASSELL ST.Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149744032Telephone: WILLIAM THOMSONContact: CAR000197079GEPAID: 2016Year: 1012175897envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 1.14675Tons: Organics Recovery Ect Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,Disposal Method: Oil/water separation sludgeWaste Category: Los AngelesTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 N. GLASSELL ST.Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149744032Telephone: WILLIAM THOMSONContact: CAR000197079GEPAID: 2016Year: 1012175897envid: OrangeFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Unspecified oil-containing wasteCat Decode: 1.14675Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: 99TSD County: AZR000515924TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 N. GLASSELL ST.Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149744032Telephone: WILLIAM THOMSONContact: CAR000197079GEPAID: MARBIL INDUSTRIES INC (Continued) 1012175897 TC5509310.2s Page 135 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.2Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 N. GLASSELL ST.Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149744032Telephone: WILLIAM THOMSONContact: CAR000197079GEPAID: 2016Year: MARBIL INDUSTRIES INC (Continued) 1012175897 PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD981391246EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 2207 N GLASSELL STFacility address: RONEL ENTERPRISESFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1270 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster I 0.241 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 199 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92865 NNW FINDS2207 N GLASSELL ST CAD981391246 I41 RCRA-SQGRONEL ENTERPRISES 1000203528 TC5509310.2s Page 136 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008267160Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: RONEL ENTERPRISESSite name: 02/24/1986Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: VALEO RONALDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: RONEL ENTERPRISES (Continued)1000203528 TC5509310.2s Page 137 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008267160DFR URL: 110008267160Registry ID: 1000203528Envid: ECHO: RONEL ENTERPRISES (Continued)1000203528 Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002927Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD981967797Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8516Longitude: 33.82515Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Robert SengaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 4Acres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 07/01/2015Status Date: Refer: Local AgencyStatus: 71002927Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1299 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster I 0.246 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 201 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92665 NNW CA HAZNET230 BRISTOL LN N/A I42 CA ENVIROSTORSUMMIT INTERCONNECT INC., ORANGE DIVISION S110494035 TC5509310.2s Page 138 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Empty containers less than 30 gallonsWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 130 W BRISTOL LANEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149748590Telephone: RAY HERNANDEZContact: CAD981967797GEPAID: 2017Year: S110494035envid: OrangeFacility County: Organics Recovery Ect Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,Method Decode: Liquids with nickel >= 134 Mg./LCat Decode: 5.73375Tons: Organics Recovery Ect Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,Disposal Method: Liquids with nickel >= 134 Mg./LWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 130 W BRISTOL LANEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149748590Telephone: RAY HERNANDEZContact: CAD981967797GEPAID: 2017Year: S110494035envid: OrangeFacility County: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToMethod Decode: Other organic solidsCat Decode: 34.7956Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 130 W BRISTOL LANEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149748590Telephone: RAY HERNANDEZContact: CAD981967797GEPAID: 2017Year: S110494035envid: HAZNET: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: SUMMIT INTERCONNECT INC., ORANGE DIVISION (Continued) S110494035 TC5509310.2s Page 139 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 440 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToMethod Decode: Auto shredder wasteCat Decode: 0.15Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Auto shredder wasteWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 130 W BRISTOL LANEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149748590Telephone: RAY HERNANDEZContact: CAD981967797GEPAID: 2017Year: S110494035envid: OrangeFacility County: Organics Recovery Ect Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,Method Decode: Waste oil and mixed oilCat Decode: 1.463Tons: Organics Recovery Ect Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration,Disposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928650000Mailing City,St,Zip: 130 W BRISTOL LANEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149748590Telephone: RAY HERNANDEZContact: CAD981967797GEPAID: 2017Year: S110494035envid: OrangeFacility County: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToMethod Decode: Empty containers less than 30 gallonsCat Decode: 0.45Tons: SUMMIT INTERCONNECT INC., ORANGE DIVISION (Continued) S110494035 TC5509310.2s Page 140 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 3Container Num: 004Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor, Pressure TestLeak Detection: 12Container Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor, Pressure TestLeak Detection: 12Container Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor, Pressure TestLeak Detection: 12Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0005Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92665Owner City,St,Zip: 345 W. MEATSOwner Address: HAMILTON MATERIALS INC.Owner Name: 7146372770Telephone: KURT HAMILTONContact Name: MFG.Other Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000059308Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: RO0003070Record ID: 04/17/2003Date Closed: Gasoline-Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleadedReleased Substance: 02UT016Facility Id: ORANGERegion: ORANGE CO. LUST: 1462 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster K 0.277 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA EMIORANGE, CA 92665 WNW CA HIST UST345 W MEATS AV N/A K43 CA LUSTHAMILTON MATERIALS INC 1000254743 TC5509310.2s Page 141 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3272SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1993Year: 4Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 13Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 2Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 14Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 16Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3272SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 6Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 20Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3272SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: VisualLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 005Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor, Pressure TestLeak Detection: 12Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: HAMILTON MATERIALS INC (Continued) 1000254743 TC5509310.2s Page 142 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3274SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1997Year: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3272SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: 11Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 12Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 3Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 9Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3272SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 11Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 12Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 3Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 9Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: HAMILTON MATERIALS INC (Continued) 1000254743 TC5509310.2s Page 143 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3274SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3274SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3274SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 14091Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1998Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: HAMILTON MATERIALS INC (Continued) 1000254743 TC5509310.2s Page 144 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3274SIC Code: SCAir District Name: HAMILTON MATERIALS INC (Continued) 1000254743 7144336262Phone Number: srajagopal@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: SHYAMALA RAJAGOPALContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900139Global Id: 9513206375Phone Number: rose.scott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900139Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 02UT016Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: 083000183TRB Case Number: SRCase Worker: 04/17/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.8550464Longitude: 33.8229869Latitude: T0605900139Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605900139Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: CA CIWQS CA WDS CA NPDES 1462 ft.CA HIST CORTESESite 2 of 2 in cluster K 0.277 mi.TRIS Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTORANGE, CA 92865 WNW CA SWEEPS UST345 W MEATS AVE 92665HMLTN345WE K44 CA LUSTWESTPAC MATERIALS 1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 145 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: NDSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: 3/13/2003Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 4/17/2003Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 1/1/1965Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900139Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 02UT016Local Case Num: 083000183TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 03/13/2003Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900139Global Id: 03/13/2003Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900139Global Id: 04/17/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900139Global Id: LUST: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 04/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900139Global Id: LUST: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 146 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIETHYLENEGLContent: PSTG: CHEMICALTank Use: 11-16-92Active Date: 15000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-059308-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 10-04-93Action Date: 11-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 59308Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: MINERAL SPIRContent: PSTG: CHEMICALTank Use: 11-16-92Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-059308-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 10-04-93Action Date: 11-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 59308Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: KCStaff Initials: RSStaff: *MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 0Max MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8550464Longitude: 33.8229869Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 147 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 345 W Meats AveOperator Address: Westpac Materials IncOperator Name: 09/15/2005Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I019791WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: NPDES: 083000183TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1 additional US_TRIS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access TRIS: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 345 W MEATSMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146372770Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00059308Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30009574Facility ID: CA FID UST: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 148 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 345 W Meats AveDischarge Address: Westpac Materials IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 09/15/2005Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I019791WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 288991Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 149 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Eric CoxOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 345 W Meats AveOperator Address: Westpac Materials IncOperator Name: r.martinez@westpac.bzContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-974-6837Contact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Robert MartinezContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 3Place Size: 09/15/2005Status Date: ActiveStatus: 09/15/2005Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I019791WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 288991Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 150 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Westpac Materials IncDischarge Name: 345 W Meats AveDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 09/15/2005Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I019791WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 288991Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: 3275-Gypsum ProductsTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 9999-Nonclassifiable EstablishmentsPrimary Sic: 22-JUN-15Certification Date: Production ManagerCertifier Title: Eric CoxCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-974-6837Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: eric@westpac.bzOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-974-6837Operator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 151 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 345 W Meats AveDischarge Address: Westpac Materials IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 09/15/2005Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I019791WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 288991Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 152 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContact Title: Robert MartinezContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 3Place Size: 09/15/2005Status Date: ActiveStatus: 09/15/2005Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I019791WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 288991Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 153 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I000605Facility ID: WDS: 3275-Gypsum ProductsTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 9999-Nonclassifiable EstablishmentsPrimary Sic: 22-JUN-15Certification Date: Production ManagerCertifier Title: Eric CoxCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-974-6837Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: eric@westpac.bzOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-974-6837Operator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Eric CoxOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 345 W Meats AveOperator Address: Westpac Materials IncOperator Name: r.martinez@westpac.bzContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-974-6837Contact Phone: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 154 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 09/15/2005Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I019791WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: MultipleSIC/NAICS: Industrial - Nonclassifiable EstablishmentsPlace/Project Type: 345 W Meats Ave, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: Westpac Materials IncAgency: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7146372770Agency Telephone: WILLIS HAMILTONAgency Contact: ORANGE 92665Agency City,St,Zip: 345 WEST MEATS AVENUEAgency Address: HAMILTON MATERIALS INC.Agency Name: JOHN DEVLINFacility Contact: 7146372770Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 TC5509310.2s Page 155 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85498Longitude: 33.82292Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: WESTPAC MATERIALS (Continued)1000853847 OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.4Tons: Solvents RecoveryDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Los AngelesTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928654226Mailing City,St,Zip: 231 W BLUERIDGE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146374111Telephone: JOHN SCHEBECKContact: CAL000317224GEPAID: 2015Year: S113146625envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.3Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: Not reportedTSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928654226Mailing City,St,Zip: 231 W BLUERIDGE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146374111Telephone: JOHN SCHEBECKContact: CAL000317224GEPAID: 2016Year: S113146625envid: HAZNET: RO0002117Record ID: 05/12/2000Date Closed: Gasoline-Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleadedReleased Substance: 97UT044Facility Id: ORANGERegion: ORANGE CO. LUST: 1477 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster L 0.280 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 185 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92865 SW CA HAZNET231 W BLUERIDGE AVE N/A L45 CA LUSTAIR CABIN ENGINEERING INC S113146625 TC5509310.2s Page 156 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.2Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: Los AngelesTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928654226Mailing City,St,Zip: 231 W BLUERIDGE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146374111Telephone: JOHN SCHEBECKContact: CAL000317224GEPAID: 2014Year: S113146625envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.4Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Los AngelesTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928654226Mailing City,St,Zip: 231 W BLUERIDGE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146374111Telephone: JOHN SCHEBECKContact: CAL000317224GEPAID: 2014Year: S113146625envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.06Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: Los AngelesTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ORANGE, CA 928654226Mailing City,St,Zip: 231 W BLUERIDGE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146374111Telephone: JOHN SCHEBECKContact: CAL000317224GEPAID: 2014Year: S113146625envid: AIR CABIN ENGINEERING INC (Continued) S113146625 TC5509310.2s Page 157 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 5 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access AIR CABIN ENGINEERING INC (Continued) S113146625 Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/27/1997Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902100Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 10/27/1997Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902100Global Id: LUST: 9517824903Phone Number: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902100Global Id: 7144336262Phone Number: srajagopal@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: SHYAMALA RAJAGOPALContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902100Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: 97UT044Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: 083003080TRB Case Number: SRCase Worker: 05/12/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.8552223Longitude: 33.818331Latitude: T0605902100Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605902100Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 1498 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster L 0.284 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 185 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92867 SW 231 BLUERIDGE N/A L46 CA LUSTFORMER SANTIAGO HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING S106447924 TC5509310.2s Page 158 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8552223Longitude: 33.818331Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/12/2000Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 10/27/1997Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605902100Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Other ground water affectedCase Type: 97UT044Local Case Num: 083003080TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 10/27/1997Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902100Global Id: 05/12/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902100Global Id: LUST: FORMER SANTIAGO HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING (Continued) S106447924 TC5509310.2s Page 159 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ARStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: FORMER SANTIAGO HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING (Continued) S106447924 083003033TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1604 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster M 0.304 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92867 West 410 N/A M47 CA HIST CORTESESTRAUB DISTRIBUTION CO S105710199 7144336262Phone Number: srajagopal@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: SHYAMALA RAJAGOPALContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902068Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 97UT046Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: 083003033TRB Case Number: SRCase Worker: 09/13/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.8500615Longitude: 33.8207572Latitude: T0605902068Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605902068Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 1604 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster M 0.304 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92865 West 410 GROVE N/A M48 CA LUSTSTRAUB DISTRIBUTING CO S111760371 TC5509310.2s Page 160 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/30/1997Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902068Global Id: 09/13/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902068Global Id: LUST: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 09/13/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902068Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/30/1997Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902068Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 10/30/1997Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902068Global Id: LUST: 9517824903Phone Number: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902068Global Id: STRAUB DISTRIBUTING CO (Continued) S111760371 FRANK BORGESEContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000009119Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EEA1.pdfURL: 0002EEA1File Number: HIST UST: RO0002171Record ID: 09/13/2002Date Closed: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D, 2-4Released Substance: 97UT046Facility Id: ORANGERegion: ORANGE CO. LUST: 1684 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster M 0.319 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 189 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA EMIORANGE, CA 92665 West CA HIST UST410 W GROVE AV N/A M49 CA LUSTSTRAUB FAMILY TRUST DIST CO IN U001577504 TC5509310.2s Page 161 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1980Year Installed: 5Container Num: 006Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: #12Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1980Year Installed: 6Container Num: 005Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009940Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009940Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009940Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009940Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0015Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92665Owner City,St,Zip: 410 W GROVE AVEOwner Address: STRAUB DISTRIBUTING COMPANY LTOwner Name: 7146377333Telephone: STRAUB FAMILY TRUST DIST CO IN (Continued) U001577504 TC5509310.2s Page 162 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009970Tank Capacity: 1977Year Installed: 1Container Num: 012Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: #12Container Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 4Container Num: 011Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009970Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 3Container Num: 010Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009970Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 2Container Num: 009Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009970Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 1Container Num: 008Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: #12Container Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: 7Container Num: 007Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: #12Container Construction Thickness: STRAUB FAMILY TRUST DIST CO IN (Continued) U001577504 TC5509310.2s Page 163 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5199SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 10620Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5199SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 10620Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: #12Container Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1977Year Installed: 4Container Num: 015Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009970Tank Capacity: 1977Year Installed: 3Container Num: 014Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009970Tank Capacity: 1977Year Installed: 2Container Num: 013Tank Num: STRAUB FAMILY TRUST DIST CO IN (Continued) U001577504 TC5509310.2s Page 164 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: STRAUB FAMILY TRUST DIST CO IN (Continued) U001577504 OtherAction Type: T0605902324Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 06/09/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902324Global Id: LUST: 9513202007Phone Number: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEMContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902324Global Id: 7146673773Phone Number: kdascomb@cityoforange.orgEmail: SANTA ANACity: 2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUEAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: KATHY DASCOMBContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902324Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083003552TRB Case Number: KDCase Worker: 09/17/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.853503Longitude: 33.816526Latitude: T0605902324Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605902324Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE, CITY OFLead Agency: LUST: 1847 ft. 0.350 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTORANGE, CA 92867 SW CA SWEEPS UST141 W TAFT AVE N/A 50 CA LUSTTHOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS S101619695 TC5509310.2s Page 165 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92667Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 141 W TAFTMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146377373Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00021921Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30004416Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-24-93Active Date: 20000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-021921-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 08-24-93Action Date: 08-24-93Referral Date: 44-016916Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 21921Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 06/09/1999Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605902324Global Id: 06/09/1999Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902324Global Id: 09/17/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902324Global Id: LUST: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 09/17/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902324Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 06/09/1999Date: THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS (Continued) S101619695 TC5509310.2s Page 166 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS (Continued) S101619695 TMEStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8538543Longitude: 33.8158061Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 9/16/1999Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 6/9/1999Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 9/17/1999Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 6/9/1999Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 9/16/1999Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902324Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: OMHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: GLASSELLCross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose inAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003552TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1954 ft. 0.370 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92867 SSW 141 TAFT AVE N/A 51 CA LUSTTHOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS S104405161 TC5509310.2s Page 167 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: NoWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: Not reportedStaff Initials: THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS (Continued) S104405161 Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/07/2005Completed Date: Phase I VerificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002438Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000481130Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD050758648Alias Name: NMAPotential Description: No Contaminants foundConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8579Longitude: 33.82095Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 71002438Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2023 ft. 0.383 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 189 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92665 West 520 W. GROVE N/A 52 CA ENVIROSTORCONTINUOUS COATING CORP.S118757409 TC5509310.2s Page 168 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: CONTINUOUS COATING CORP. (Continued) S118757409 Leak ReportedAction: 06/12/1996Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901952Global Id: LUST: 9517824903Phone Number: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901952Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: r8 UNKNOWNCity: Not reportedAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: UNKContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901952Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083002846TRB Case Number: VJBCase Worker: 08/13/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.859334Longitude: 33.820108Latitude: T0605901952Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605901952Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: LUST: 2435 ft.CA CIWQSSite 1 of 3 in cluster N 0.461 mi.CA NPDES Relative: Lower Actual: 189 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTORANGE, CA 92665 West CA SWEEPS UST700 W GROVE N/A N53 CA LUSTCOCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 169 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 800010Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 11-06-91Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800010-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 09-30-93Action Date: 11-06-91Referral Date: 44-016995Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 800010Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 11-06-91Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800010-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 09-30-93Action Date: 11-06-91Referral Date: 44-016995Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 800010Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 12/12/1995Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901952Global Id: 12/12/1995Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901952Global Id: 08/13/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901952Global Id: LUST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/12/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901952Global Id: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 170 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedMail To: 7149741900Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 000S0655TRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30005734Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: FRESH OILContent: PSTG: OILTank Use: 11-06-91Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800010-000005SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 09-30-93Action Date: 11-06-91Referral Date: 44-016995Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 800010Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 11-06-91Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800010-000004SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 09-30-93Action Date: 11-06-91Referral Date: 44-016995Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 800010Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 11-06-91Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800010-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 09-30-93Action Date: 11-06-91Referral Date: 44-016995Board Of Equalization: 1Number: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 171 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I006472WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208590Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: Coca Cola Bottling Company of LADischarge Name: 700 W Grove AveDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 10/31/2017Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/24/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I006472WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 208590Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: TerminatedFacility Status: NPDES: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 14655 WICKSMailing Address: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 172 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSecondary Sic: 4213-Trucking, Except LocalPrimary Sic: 09-JUN-15Certification Date: Distribution Center ManagerCertifier Title: Alex FosterCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: FloridaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: afoster@coca-cola.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-282-2000Operator Contact Phone: Distribution Center ManagerOperator Contact Title: Alex FosterOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 700 W Grove AveOperator Address: Coca Cola Bottling Company of LAOperator Name: afoster@coca-cola.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-282-2000Contact Phone: Distribution Center ManagerContact Title: Alex FosterContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 8.93Place Size: 04/24/1992Status Date: ActiveStatus: 04/24/1992Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 173 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 700 W Grove AveDischarge Address: Coca Cola Bottling Company of LADischarge Name: 10/31/2017Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/24/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I006472WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208590Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: TerminatedStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 174 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 492314Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: Reyes Coca Cola Bottling LLCDischarge Name: 700 West Grove AvenueDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 10/31/2017Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I027419WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 492314Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 175 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 700 West Grove AvenueDischarge Address: Reyes Coca Cola Bottling LLCDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 10/31/2017Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I027419WDID: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 176 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I006472WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208590Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 700 W Grove AveOperator Address: Coca Cola Bottling Company of LAOperator Name: 11/28/2017Status Date: TerminatedStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I006472WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 177 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 4213-Trucking, Except LocalPrimary Sic: 09-JUN-15Certification Date: Distribution Center ManagerCertifier Title: Alex FosterCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: FloridaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: afoster@coca-cola.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-282-2000Operator Contact Phone: Distribution Center ManagerOperator Contact Title: Alex FosterOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 700 W Grove AveOperator Address: Coca Cola Bottling Company of LAOperator Name: afoster@coca-cola.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-282-2000Contact Phone: Distribution Center ManagerContact Title: Alex FosterContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 8.93Place Size: 04/24/1992Status Date: ActiveStatus: 04/24/1992Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 178 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 700 W Grove AveDischarge Address: Coca Cola Bottling Company of LADischarge Name: 10/31/2017Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/24/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I006472WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208590Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: TerminatedStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 179 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I027419WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 492314Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 700 West Grove AvenueOperator Address: Reyes Coca Cola Bottling LLCOperator Name: 10/31/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I027419WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 180 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 700 West Grove AvenueDischarge Address: Reyes Coca Cola Bottling LLCDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 10/31/2017Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 181 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 33.82052Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 10/31/2017Termination Date: 04/24/1992Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I006472WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: 4213SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Trucking, Except LocalPlace/Project Type: 700 W Grove Ave, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: Coca Cola Bottling Company of LAAgency: -117.85876Longitude: 33.82052Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 10/31/2017Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I027419WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: 4213SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Trucking, Except LocalPlace/Project Type: 700 West Grove Avenue, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: Reyes Coca Cola Bottling LLCAgency: CIWQS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 TC5509310.2s Page 182 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85876Longitude: COCA COLA BOTTLING CO - ORANGE (Continued) S101589306 Mon - Fri 8:00 am - 4:30 pm; Sat 8:00 am - 12:00 am; Sun ClosedHours of Operation: Not reportedBimetal: Not reportedPlastic: Not reportedGlass: Not reportedAluminium: 03/23/2012Operation Begin Date: N/ARural: (714) 283-6188Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: Not reportedWebsite: 92865Mailing Zip Code: CAMailing State: OrangeMailing City: 2411 N GlassellMailing Address: SA Recycling LLCOrganization Name: 41342Organization Id: PR153938.001Cert Id: 153938Reg Id: PROC: 2508 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster O 0.475 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 201 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92865 NNW 2411 N GLASSEL ST N/A O54 CA PROCSA RECYCLING S111859575 8/8/1996Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901952Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: BATAVIACross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose inAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002846TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2532 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster N 0.480 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 190 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92865 West CA HIST CORTESE700 GROVE AVE N/A N55 CA LUSTCOCA-COLA ENTERPRISES S102428192 TC5509310.2s Page 183 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083002846TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: ALSO DIESEL, WASTE OIL AND NEW OILSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8597775Longitude: 33.820871Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 8/8/1996Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 8/13/1996Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 12/12/1995Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 12/12/1995Date Confirmation of Leak Began: COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES (Continued) S102428192 Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.854167Longitude: 33.828285Latitude: T0605901372Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605901372Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE, CITY OFLead Agency: LUST: 2605 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster O 0.493 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 200 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92665 NNW 2440 N GLASSELL ST N/A O56 CA LUSTDESERT PETROLEUM SS #0090 S100933856 TC5509310.2s Page 184 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/24/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901372Global Id: 04/05/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901372Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 04/11/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901372Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 12/24/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901372Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/04/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901372Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: r8 UNKNOWNCity: Not reportedAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: UNKContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901372Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901372Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083001834TRB Case Number: UNKCase Worker: 04/05/1995Status Date: DESERT PETROLEUM SS #0090 (Continued) S100933856 TC5509310.2s Page 185 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8533145Longitude: 33.8289618Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 4/15/1991Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 4/5/1995Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 3/4/1991Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 4/15/1991Enter Date: 12/24/1989How Stopped Date: T0605901372Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: FLETCHERCross Street: Vapor ExtractionAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001834TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2605 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster O 0.493 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 200 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92665 NNW CA HIST CORTESE2440 GLASSELL ST N/A O57 CA LUSTDESERT PETROLEUM SS #0090 S104761147 TC5509310.2s Page 186 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083001834TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: DESERT PETROLEUM SS #0090 (Continued) S104761147 OtherAction Type: T0605901916Global Id: LUST: 9517824903Phone Number: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901916Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: r8 UNKNOWNCity: Not reportedAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: UNKContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901916Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083002776TRB Case Number: VJBCase Worker: 11/18/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.8597815Longitude: 33.821091Latitude: T0605901916Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605901916Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: LUST: 2607 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster N 0.494 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 189 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTORANGE, CA 92665 West CA SWEEPS UST701 W GROVE N/A N58 CA LUSTRSA SOIL PRODUCTS, INC.S101589304 TC5509310.2s Page 187 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 800011Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10-30-91Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800011-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 10-06-93Action Date: 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016996Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 800011Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 04/01/1995Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901916Global Id: 05/17/1996Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605901916Global Id: 03/27/1995Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901916Global Id: 11/18/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901916Global Id: LUST: Leak StoppedAction: 03/27/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901916Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/27/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901916Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 11/18/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901916Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 06/08/1995Date: RSA SOIL PRODUCTS, INC. (Continued) S101589304 TC5509310.2s Page 188 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 701 W GROVEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149987720Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 000G0701TRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30005459Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 10-28-92Active Date: 250Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800011-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 10-06-93Action Date: 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016996Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 800011Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10-28-92Active Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-800011-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 04-03-89Created Date: 10-06-93Action Date: 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016996Board Of Equalization: 1Number: RSA SOIL PRODUCTS, INC. (Continued) S101589304 TC5509310.2s Page 189 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30000Local Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: Not reportedStaff Initials: TMEStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.857464Longitude: 33.826Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 8/28/2000Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 11/16/1999Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 8/28/2000Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605999277Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003772TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2614 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster P 0.495 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92865 NW 2314 PACIFIC ST N/A P59 CA LUSTRICK HAMM CONSTRUCTION S104791914 TC5509310.2s Page 190 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: NoWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: RICK HAMM CONSTRUCTION (Continued) S104791914 ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 11/16/1999Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605999277Global Id: 11/16/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605999277Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 11/16/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605999277Global Id: LUST: 9513202007Phone Number: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEMContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605999277Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLocal Agency: 083003772TRB Case Number: TMECase Worker: 11/16/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.857464Longitude: 33.826Latitude: T0605999277Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605999277Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: LUST: 2614 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster P 0.495 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTORANGE, CA 92665 NW CA SWEEPS UST2314 N PACIFIC N/A P60 CA LUSTRICK HAMM CONSTRUCTION, INC.S101589328 TC5509310.2s Page 191 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 2314 N PACIFICMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146372454Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00068798Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30006509Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-22-91Active Date: 4000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-068798-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 01-11-94Action Date: 12-22-91Referral Date: 44-016988Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 68798Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-22-91Active Date: 4000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-068798-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 01-11-94Action Date: 12-22-91Referral Date: 44-016988Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 68798Comp Number: RICK HAMM CONSTRUCTION, INC. (Continued) S101589328 TC5509310.2s Page 192 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/03/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605999124Global Id: LUST: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 06/03/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605999124Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 06/03/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605999124Global Id: LUST: 9513206375Phone Number: rose.scott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605999124Global Id: 7146673773Phone Number: kdascomb@cityoforange.orgEmail: SANTA ANACity: 2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUEAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: KATHY DASCOMBContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605999124Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083003744TRB Case Number: RSCase Worker: 06/03/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.8433406Longitude: 33.8158692Latitude: T0605999124Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605999124Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: LUST: 2620 ft. 0.496 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92865 SE 1075 N TAFT N/A 61 CA LUSTORANGE POST OFFICE S109284848 TC5509310.2s Page 193 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/03/1999Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605999124Global Id: ORANGE POST OFFICE (Continued) S109284848 04/04/2000Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 226Telephone ext.: 714-507-4900Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: ROGER MLCOCHContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92807-2057 4900 E. HUNTER AVE.Mailing address: CAD046055893EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92665 1739 N. CASE STFacility address: MCCURDY CIRCUITS, INC.Site name: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INCFacility name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: CA HIST CORTESE CA EMI 2731 ft.ECHOSite 1 of 2 in cluster Q 0.517 mi.FINDS Relative: Lower Actual: 183 ft. 1/2-1 CA LUSTORANGE, CA 92665 SW CA ENVIROSTOR1739 N. CASE ST CAD046055893 Q62 RCRA-SQGCIRCUIT CONNECTION INC 1000427084 TC5509310.2s Page 194 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/19/1998Date achieved compliance: 03/19/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: MCCURDY CIRCUITS INCSite name: 04/16/1990Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: MCCURDY CIRCUITS INCSite name: 03/02/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: MCCURDY CIRCUITS INCSite name: 03/22/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: MCCURDY CIRCUITS, INC.Site name: 04/29/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INCSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: MC CURDY CIRCUITS, INC.Site name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INCSite name: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INC (Continued) 1000427084 TC5509310.2s Page 195 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002406Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD046055893Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8583Longitude: 33.81641Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002406Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 03/19/1998Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/19/1993Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INC (Continued) 1000427084 TC5509310.2s Page 196 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901559Global Id: LUST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/02/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901559Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/28/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901559Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 03/07/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901559Global Id: LUST: 9513202007Phone Number: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEMContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901559Global Id: 7146673773Phone Number: kdascomb@cityoforange.orgEmail: SANTA ANACity: 2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUEAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: KATHY DASCOMBContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901559Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: CopperPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083002098TRB Case Number: TMECase Worker: 03/07/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.858351Longitude: 33.816411Latitude: T0605901559Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605901559Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: LUST: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INC (Continued) 1000427084 TC5509310.2s Page 197 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8587654Longitude: 33.8162181Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 7/23/1992Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 9/2/1992Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 3/7/2001Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/2/1986Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 7/23/1992Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901559Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: OMHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: TAFTCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: CopperSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002098TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 09/02/1992Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901559Global Id: 09/02/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901559Global Id: 03/07/2001Status Date: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INC (Continued) 1000427084 TC5509310.2s Page 198 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3672SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 74191Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008261816DFR URL: 110008261816Registry ID: 1000427084Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information Environmental Interest/Information System 110008261816Registry ID: FINDS: - 507 -4900 on Nov. 7, 2000. Site closed March 7, 2001. INVESTIGATED. Called and left messages for Ragelio of McCurdy Circuits at 714 COPPER AND ACID SOLUTIONS. FIRE DEPT CLOSED CASE. GROUNDWATER HAS NOT BEENSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: KATStaff Initials: TMEStaff: *MTBE Class: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INC (Continued) 1000427084 TC5509310.2s Page 199 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083002098TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: CIRCUIT CONNECTION INC (Continued) 1000427084 OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 951-735-1417Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CORONA, CA 92881 SUMMERPLACE CT.Owner/operator address: NINA U. JUAREZOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: ULTRAPUREMETAL@SBCGLOBAL.NETContact email: 714-637-3150Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 CASE STContact address: RAFAEL SALCEDOContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 CASE STMailing address: CAD981449028EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 1764 CASE STFacility address: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INCFacility name: 04/18/2017Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 2747 ft.CA CIWQSSite 2 of 2 in cluster Q 0.520 mi.CA WDS Relative: Lower Actual: 184 ft. 1/2-1 CA NPDESORANGE, CA 92865 WSW CA ENVIROSTOR1764 CASE ST CAD981449028 Q63 RCRA-LQGULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 200 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1985Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1985Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-3150Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 CASE STOwner/operator address: NINA U JUAREZOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/15/1985Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-3150Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N. CASE STOwner/operator address: ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHING INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 10/17/1996Owner/Op start date: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 201 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Unspecified alkaline solution. Waste name: 123. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INCSite name: 05/22/2012Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INCSite name: 02/24/2016Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc) beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, Alkaline solution (pH >12.5) with metals (antimony, arsenic, barium,. Waste name: 121. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 202 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2 with metals. Waste name: 792. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Unspecified aqueous solution. Waste name: 135. Waste code: Unspecified alkaline solution. Waste name: 123. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC.Site name: 08/24/2010Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 203 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 06/19/2014Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 18000Amount (Lbs): ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPTWaste name: F006Waste code: 350Amount (Lbs): CHROMIUMWaste name: D007Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2017 Biennial Reports: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHINGSite name: 03/25/1986Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHINGSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING, INC.Site name: 03/03/2008Date form received by agency: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 204 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/09/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/19/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/19/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/06/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/12/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/07/2015Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 05/31/2011Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 205 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002846Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/04/2008Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/16/2008Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/23/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/24/2010Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/31/2011Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/12/2012Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/30/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 206 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: Ultra Pure Metal Finishing IncDischarge Name: 1764 N Case StDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 05/07/1999Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I015113WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 208962Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: NPDES: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002846Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110008269284Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD981449028Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8591Longitude: 33.81686Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 207 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 1764 N Case StDischarge Address: Ultra Pure Metal Finishing IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 05/07/1999Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I015113WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208962Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 208 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ultrapuremetal@sbcglobal.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-637-3150Contact Phone: General ManagerContact Title: David JuarezContact: SqFtPlace Size Unit: 21820Place Size: 05/07/1999Status Date: ActiveStatus: 05/07/1999Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I015113WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208962Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 209 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I015113WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringPrimary Sic: 27-JUL-15Certification Date: General ManagerCertifier Title: David JuarezCertifier: Municipal storm water systemReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-637-3150Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: ultrapuremetal@sbcglobal.netOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-637-3150Operator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Rafael SalcedoOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 1764 N Case StOperator Address: Ultra Pure Metal Finishing IncOperator Name: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 210 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 92865Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 1764 N Case StDischarge Address: Ultra Pure Metal Finishing IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 05/07/1999Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I015113WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 208962Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 1764 N Case StOperator Address: Ultra Pure Metal Finishing IncOperator Name: 05/07/1999Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 211 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/07/1999Processed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I015113WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 208962Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 212 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringPrimary Sic: 27-JUL-15Certification Date: General ManagerCertifier Title: David JuarezCertifier: Municipal storm water systemReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: 714-637-3150Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: ultrapuremetal@sbcglobal.netOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-637-3150Operator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Rafael SalcedoOperator Contact: 92865Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: OrangeOperator City: 1764 N Case StOperator Address: Ultra Pure Metal Finishing IncOperator Name: ultrapuremetal@sbcglobal.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-637-3150Contact Phone: General ManagerContact Title: David JuarezContact: SqFtPlace Size Unit: 21820Place Size: 05/07/1999Status Date: ActiveStatus: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 213 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: 3471SIC/NAICS: Coloring Industrial - Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, andPlace/Project Type: 1764 N Case St, Orange, CA 92865Agency Address: Ultra Pure Metal Finishing IncAgency: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7146373150Agency Telephone: DAVID JUAREZAgency Contact: ORANGE 92865Agency City,St,Zip: 1790 NORTH CASE STREETAgency Address: ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHING INCAgency Name: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedFacility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I015113Facility ID: WDS: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 TC5509310.2s Page 214 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85879Longitude: 33.81667Latitude: 1Violations within 5 years: 1Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 05/07/1999Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I015113WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ULTRA-PURE METAL FINISHING INC (Continued) 1000352574 EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD982360646Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: VAN DOREN RUBBER COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MARLEY HEAT TRANSFER COMPANY, THEAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: 2<PH<12.5, WITH METALS Lead Nickel OXYGENATED SOLVENTS * CONTAMINATED SOIL * ALKALINE SOLUTION * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS * Metals - Other Inorganic Solid Waste *Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8619Longitude: 33.81722Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 06/01/1995Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: 30340167Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3285 ft. 0.622 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 192 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92667 West CA EMI2095 NORTH BATAVIA N/A 64 CA ENVIROSTORVAN DOREN RUBBER CO, INC.S103980190 TC5509310.2s Page 215 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 306SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 42972Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: DRUMS. ADDITIONAL RESEARCH REQ TO DETERMINE TYPES OF CHEMICALS USED SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: VACANT VACILITY WITH ABANDONEDComments: 09/12/1986Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: UNAUTHORIZED DISPOSAL OF WST TO SOIL PRELIM ASSESS DONE PRESENCE OF METALLIC DUST AT REAR OF FACComments: 05/09/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 11, 1984. Health Care Agency issued an order to cleanup the site in December File review indicates that the site is a generator. County of OrangeComments: 05/02/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: NFA for DTSC. Health Care Agency issued an Order to clean up the site on 12/11/84. File review indicates that the site is a generator. County of OrangeComments: 06/01/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID DURING A FIELD CHECK IN ORANGE.Comments: 06/23/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30340167Alias Name: VAN DOREN RUBBER CO, INC. (Continued) S103980190 TC5509310.2s Page 216 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 111Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 122Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: VAN DOREN RUBBER CO, INC. (Continued) S103980190 1SEQ: DISCVRYAction Name: DSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSSite Name: CAD097577035EPA ID: 901690Site ID: 9Region: EPA Perf In-HseCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1985-11-01 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: ARCH SITEAction Name: VSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSSite Name: CAD097577035EPA ID: 901690Site ID: 9Region: SEMS Archive Detail: -117.859722Longitude: 33.825000000000003Latitude: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFF: 6059FIPS Code: 39Cong District: CAD097577035EPA ID: 901690Site ID: SEMS Archive: CA HWP ECHO FINDS CA HIST UST 3324 ft.CA ENVIROSTOR 0.630 mi.RCRA-SQG Relative: Lower Actual: 193 ft. 1/2-1 RCRA-TSDFORANGE, CA 92865 WNW CORRACTS812 SOUTHERN AVE CAD097577035 65 SEMS-ARCHIVEORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 217 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 812 SOUTHERN AVENUEOwner/operator address: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ORANGE, CA 92665 812 SOUTHERN AVENUEMailing address: CAD097577035EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 812 SOUTHERN AVEFacility address: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-TSDF: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Electronic Component Manufacturing 334419NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a lowAction: 19851101Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD097577035EPA ID: CORRACTS: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: NQual: 1985-11-01 00:00:00Finish Date: 1985-04-01 00:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: PAAction Name: PAAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSSite Name: CAD097577035EPA ID: 901690Site ID: 9Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1980-12-01 00:00:00Finish Date: 1980-12-01 00:00:00Start Date: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 218 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NCAPS RANKING/PRIORITYEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: CA PRIORITIZATION-LOW CA PRIORITYEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATIONEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSSite name: 12/17/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-2210Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, CA 99999 812 SOUTHERN AVENUEOwner/operator address: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-2210Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92665 ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 219 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/18/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/18/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 12/13/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/30/1989Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: F - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 19374 Final penalty amount: 19374 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 02/24/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 11/06/1989Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 12/13/1989Date violation determined: TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: F - 264.110-120.GRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 220 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: 07/22/1987Date violation determined: Formal Enforcement Agreement or OrderArea of violation: F - FEARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/21/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/12/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 19374 Final penalty amount: 19374 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 02/24/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/12/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/18/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/15/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/18/1988Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: F - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 221 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: Formal Enforcement Agreement or OrderArea of violation: COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATIONEvaluation: 07/22/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 10/12/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/18/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/15/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/18/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/30/1989Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/30/1989Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 11/06/1989Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/15/1987 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: 05/07/1987Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 222 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-2210Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, CA 99999 812 SOUTHERN AVENUEOwner/operator address: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-637-2210Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92665 812 SOUTHERN AVENUEOwner/operator address: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ORANGE, CA 92665 812 SOUTHERN AVENUEMailing address: CAD097577035EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 812 SOUTHERN AVEFacility address: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/07/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 223 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enf. disposition status: 02/24/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 11/06/1989Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 12/13/1989Date violation determined: TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: F - 264.110-120.GRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: NCAPS RANKING/PRIORITYEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: CA PRIORITIZATION-LOW CA PRIORITYEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATIONEvent: 11/01/1985Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITSSite name: 12/17/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 224 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 02/24/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/12/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/18/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/15/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/18/1988Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: F - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/18/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/18/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 12/13/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/30/1989Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: F - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 19374 Final penalty amount: 19374 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 225 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/30/1989Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 11/06/1989Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/15/1987 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: 05/07/1987Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: 07/22/1987Date violation determined: Formal Enforcement Agreement or OrderArea of violation: F - FEARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/21/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: 10/12/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: 19374 Final penalty amount: 19374 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 226 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * Site Char & Assess Grant (CERCLA 104)Special Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: 400312Site Code: 08/28/1995Status Date: Refer: RCRAStatus: 30360250Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/07/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/11/1987Date achieved compliance: Formal Enforcement Agreement or OrderArea of violation: COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATIONEvaluation: 07/22/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 10/12/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/18/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/15/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/18/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/30/1989Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/13/1989Date achieved compliance: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 227 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 400312Site Code: 05/01/2012Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 80001732Facility ID: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: sump onsite. Preliminary Assessment submitted to EPA. of printed circuit boards. 1000-gallon tanks, 1500-gallon underground Preliminary Assessment Done (Cercla 104): Operation is manufacturingComments: 04/01/1985Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Database Validation Program confirms NFA for DTSC.Comments: 01/19/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: of waste tank. County Sanitation Inspection (01/27/82) - Faulty back-up for overflow issued Class I Waste- water Permit (06/01/79). ISD issued 01/04/82. No storage over ninety days. Records Search: County Sanititation Facility identified. DHS ISD inspection - permit exemption required.Comments: 02/02/1983Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30360250Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400312Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110008263645Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD097577035Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Not reported SOLUTION * UNSPECIFIED AQUEOUS SOLUTION * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * TANK BOTTOM WASTES * UNSPECIFIED ACIDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8608Longitude: 33.82507Latitude: Not reportedFunding: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 228 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: approved via the ytermination of corrective action The report was deemed necessary to terminate corrective action and isComments: 07/19/2011Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/31/2011Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/01/1985Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001732Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30360250Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400312Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110008263645Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD097577035Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 374-613-04Alias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: 30013-NO Copper and compounds 30027-NOConfirmed COC: Lead Trichloroethylene (TCE Copper and compoundsPotential COC: ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, METAL RECLAMATION, RECYCLING - OTHERPast Use: 374-613-04APN: -117.8608Longitude: 33.82512Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup ChatsworthDivision Branch: Rita KamatSupervisor: Richard AllenProgram Manager: WMLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.5Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 229 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110008263645Registry ID: FINDS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 001Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001500Tank Capacity: 1978Year Installed: 002Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92665Owner City,St,Zip: 812 SOUTHERN AVE.Owner Address: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS DIV.Owner Name: 7146372210Telephone: DENNIS WOJTKIEWICZContact Name: PRINTED CIR. MFG.Other Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000054227Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EC6D.pdfURL: 0002EC6DFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: RFA’s are completed in-house and need not be approvedComments: 08/05/2002Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/16/2011Completed Date: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 230 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD097577035EPA Id: 04/29/1992Actual Date: Closure Final - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATIONEvent Description: TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD097577035EPA Id: Closure: 04/25/1989Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVEDEvent Description: Not reportedUnit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD097577035EPA Id: 04/29/1988Actual Date: New Operating Permit - CALL-IN LETTER ISSUEDEvent Description: Not reportedUnit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD097577035EPA Id: Activities: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 37Senate District: 68Assembly District: 400312Site Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -117.8608Longitude: 33.82512Latitude: CLOSEDCleanup Status: CAD097577035EPA Id: HWP: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008263645DFR URL: 110008263645Registry ID: 1000315092Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 TC5509310.2s Page 231 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 400312Alias: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD097577035EPA Id: 30360250Alias: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD097577035EPA Id: 110008263645Alias: FRSAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD097577035EPA Id: Alias: 06/11/1993Actual Date: ORANGE PRECISION CIRCUITS (Continued) 1000315092 400038Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033605962Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: CONTINENTAL MOULDING FACILITYAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 30032-NO 30386-NO 30593-NOConfirmed COC: Acetone Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone XylenesPotential COC : MANUFACTURING - OTHERPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8620Longitude: 33.81799Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 11/19/1987Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 37Senate: 68Assembly: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: 400038Site Code: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Thomas CotaSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: Not reportedLead Agency Description: NONE SPECIFIEDCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 12Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detail: State ResponseSite Type: 30240011Facility ID: RESPONSE: 3337 ft. 0.632 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 185 ft. 1/2-1 CA HIST Cal-SitesORANGE, CA 92666 WSW CA ENVIROSTOR1841 N. BATAVIA STREET N/A 66 CA RESPONSECONTINENTAL MOLDING S105749951 TC5509310.2s Page 232 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30240011Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400038Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033605962Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: CONTINENTAL MOULDING FACILITYAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 30032-NO 30386-NO 30593-NOConfirmed COC: Acetone Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone XylenesPotential COC: MANUFACTURING - OTHERPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8620Longitude: 33.81799Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Thomas CotaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 12Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detailed: State ResponseSite Type: 400038Site Code: 11/19/1987Status Date: CertifiedStatus: 30240011Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/19/1987Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30240011Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: CONTINENTAL MOLDING (Continued) S105749951 TC5509310.2s Page 233 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 11191987Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: CERTIFICATIONActivity Name: CERTActivity: 30240011Facility ID: 33State Senate District Code: 72State Assembly District Code: DATA PROVIDED BY PM 1/03Lat/Long Description: Not reportedLat/long Method: 0 0 0 / 0 0 0Lat/Long (dms): Not reportedLat/Long Direction: Not reportedRegion Water Control Board Name: Not reportedRegion Water Control Board: Not reportedSupervisor Responsible for Site: Not reportedStaff Member Responsible for Site: Not reportedGroundwater Contamination: Not reportedDate Site Hazard Ranked: Not reportedHazardous Ranking Score: Not reportedCortese: Not reportedAccess: MANU - LUMBER & WOOD PRODUCTSSIC Name: 24SIC Code: Not ListedNPL: N/ALead Agency: CERTIFIEDStatus Name: CERTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN REMEDIED SATISFACTORILY UNDER DTSC OVERSIGHTStatus: 11191987State Senate District: Not reportedFile Name: SO CAL - CYPRESSBranch Name: SBBranch: RESPONSIBLE PARTYType: RPFacility Type: 30240011Facility ID: CYPRESSRegion: Calsite: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/19/1987Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: CONTINENTAL MOLDING (Continued) S105749951 TC5509310.2s Page 234 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSpecial Programs Name: Not reportedSpecial Programs Code: Not reportedAlternate Name: CONTINENTAL MOLDINGAlternate Name: CONTINENTAL MOULDING FACILITYAlternate Name: 400038ID Value: CALSTARS CODEID Name: tank bottoms removed.Comments: 10221986Comments Date: Removal of 105 cubic yards of contaminated soil. Drums andComments: 10221986Comments Date: Section 25356.Comments: 05011986Comments Date: This is the date the site was first listed AWP pursuant toComments: 05011986Comments Date: Site is certified as of 11/19/87.Comments: 04281989Comments Date: Not reportedBackground Info: ORANGE, CA 92666Alternate City,St,Zip: 1841 N. BATAVIA STREETAlternate Address: ORANGE, CA 92666Alternate City,St,Zip: 1841 BATAVIA STREETAlternate Address: ORANGE, CA 92665Alternate City,St,Zip: CORNER OF BATAVIA STREET AND TAFT AVENUEAlternate Address: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCEDefinition of Status: COMActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: CONTINENTAL MOLDING (Continued) S105749951 Isaac HirbawiProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 25Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401710Site Code: 10/23/2013Status Date: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions OnlyStatus: 30280027Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3941 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster R 0.746 mi.CA HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 188 ft. 1/2-1 CA DEEDORANGE, CA 92665 West CA VCP2060 NORTH BATAVIA N/A R67 CA ENVIROSTORFXI, INC.S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 235 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 01/09/2015Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/11/2016Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280027Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401710Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401682Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401682Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401613Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401613Alias Name: Site Code - HistoricalAlias Type: 401613Alias Name: Site Code - HistoricalAlias Type: 400519Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000480122Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD008352361Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 374-751-30Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC.Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: WASTE Cyanide (free * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * WASTE OIL & MIXED OIL * POLYMERIC RESINPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 374-751-30APN: -117.8642Longitude: 33.82116Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: YESRestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Maryam Tasnif-AbbasiSupervisor: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 236 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/04/1987Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: BY LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES HRS PACKAGE WILL BE PREPARED SITE INSP DONE STAFF RECOMMENDS COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS BE CONDUCTEDComments: 08/30/1988Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: RECOMMENDATION TO LISTING SITE INSPECTION. SITE SCREENING DONE EPA EVALUATED DHS’ SITE INSPECTION AND CHANGEDComments: 10/04/1989Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: and Sdc = 0. pathway scores were: Sgw = 30.04; Ssw = 2.61; Sa = 0; Sfe = 20.83; SI performed in Sept. 1988. The migration score was 17.43. Other A Hazard Ranking Scoring package was prepared by DTSC staff using theComments: 12/10/1992Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/23/2013Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Action completed.Comments: 03/01/2017Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/21/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/26/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/30/2015Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 237 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/26/2017Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/04/2013Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/15/2014Completed Date: Land Use Restriction Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/18/2013Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/12/2013Completed Date: Technical WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/22/2013Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/01/2012Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/01/2012Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: MANUFACTURES POLYURETHANE FOAM PRODUCTS SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: ADDITIONAL INFO NEEDEDComments: 11/05/1986Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: PRELIM ASSESS DONE AREA OF SUSP. DUMPING SHOULDBE SAMPLED LABELING AND STORAGEPROBLEMS. RELEASED WASTE NEEDS REMEDIATING. INSPECTION(LOCAL) 1987, 85, 86-VIOLATIONS NOTED AT EACH DRIVEBY.Comments: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 238 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 25Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 30280027Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED FROM INDUSTRIAL WASTE SURVEY-1980.Comments: 06/23/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/19/2015Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/22/2014Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement fully executed.Comments: 04/18/2012Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/23/2014Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/28/2017Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 239 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01/09/2015Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/11/2016Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280027Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401710Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401682Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401682Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401613Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401613Alias Name: Site Code - HistoricalAlias Type: 401613Alias Name: Site Code - HistoricalAlias Type: 400519Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000480122Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD008352361Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 374-751-30Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC.Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: 10003, 10199, 20015, 30160Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 374-751-30APN: 33.82116 / -117.8642Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: YESRestricted Use: 10/23/2013Status Date: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions OnlyStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: 37Senate: 68Assembly: 401710Site Code: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Maryam Tasnif-AbbasiSupervisor: Isaac HirbawiProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 240 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: BY LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES HRS PACKAGE WILL BE PREPARED SITE INSP DONE STAFF RECOMMENDS COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS BE CONDUCTEDComments: 08/30/1988Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: RECOMMENDATION TO LISTING SITE INSPECTION. SITE SCREENING DONE EPA EVALUATED DHS’ SITE INSPECTION AND CHANGEDComments: 10/04/1989Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: and Sdc = 0. pathway scores were: Sgw = 30.04; Ssw = 2.61; Sa = 0; Sfe = 20.83; SI performed in Sept. 1988. The migration score was 17.43. Other A Hazard Ranking Scoring package was prepared by DTSC staff using theComments: 12/10/1992Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/23/2013Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Action completed.Comments: 03/01/2017Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/21/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/26/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/30/2015Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 241 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/04/2013Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/15/2014Completed Date: Land Use Restriction Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/18/2013Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/12/2013Completed Date: Technical WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/22/2013Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/01/2012Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/01/2012Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: MANUFACTURES POLYURETHANE FOAM PRODUCTS SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: ADDITIONAL INFO NEEDEDComments: 11/05/1986Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: PRELIM ASSESS DONE AREA OF SUSP. DUMPING SHOULDBE SAMPLED LABELING AND STORAGEPROBLEMS. RELEASED WASTE NEEDS REMEDIATING. INSPECTION(LOCAL) 1987, 85, 86-VIOLATIONS NOTED AT EACH DRIVEBY.Comments: 06/04/1987Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 242 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYStatus: VOLUNTARY CLEANUPSite Type: Not reportedSub Area: PROJECT WIDEArea: 30280027Envirostor ID: DEED: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED FROM INDUSTRIAL WASTE SURVEY-1980.Comments: 06/23/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/19/2015Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/22/2014Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement fully executed.Comments: 04/18/2012Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/23/2014Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/28/2017Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/26/2017Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 TC5509310.2s Page 243 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 5.0000Tons: Disposal, Land FillDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: PACIFIC, WA 980470000Mailing City,St,Zip: 151 STEWARTMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: GORDON TRUCKING INCContact: CAC001178416GEPAID: 1999Year: S112872180envid: HAZNET: Envirostor Land Use RestrictionsFile Name: Not reportedDeed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: FXI, INC. (Continued)S112872180 ARCH SITEAction Name: VSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION CO INCSite Name: CAD008352361EPA ID: 903287Site ID: 9Region: SEMS Archive Detail: -117.841667Longitude: 33.826667Latitude: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFF: 6059FIPS Code: 39Cong District: CAD008352361EPA ID: 903287Site ID: SEMS Archive: CA CIWQS CA WDS CA NPDES CA HWP CA EMI TRIS CA FID UST CA HIST UST 3941 ft.CA SWEEPS USTSite 2 of 2 in cluster R 0.746 mi.CA ENVIROSTOR Relative: Lower Actual: 188 ft. 1/2-1 RCRA-LQGORANGE, CA 92865 West RCRA-TSDF2060 N BATAVIA ST 92665GRFMX2060N R68 SEMS-ARCHIVEFXI INC 1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 244 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFF: NNPL: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION CO INCSite Name: CAD008352361EPA ID: 903287Site ID: 9Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: NQual: 1991-11-04 00:00:00Finish Date: 1990-09-18 00:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: ESIAction Name: ESAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION CO INCSite Name: CAD008352361EPA ID: 903287Site ID: 9Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1988-05-01 00:00:00Finish Date: 1988-05-01 00:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: DISCVRYAction Name: DSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION CO INCSite Name: CAD008352361EPA ID: 903287Site ID: 9Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: LQual: 1988-06-01 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: PAAction Name: PAAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION CO INCSite Name: CAD008352361EPA ID: 903287Site ID: 9Region: EPA Perf In-HseCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1991-11-04 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 245 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 06/01/2009Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 610-744-2300Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: MEDIA, PA 19063 1400 N PROVIDENCE RD STE 200Owner/operator address: FXI INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: LGALLARDO@FXI.COMContact email: 714-685-7287Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STContact address: LIDIA GALLARDOContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STMailing address: CAD008352361EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 2060 N BATAVIA STFacility address: FXI, INCFacility name: 01/17/2018Date form received by agency: RCRA-TSDF: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: HQual: 1989-10-04 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: SIAction Name: SIAction Code: 0OU: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 246 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 141. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 08/01/2016Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: LCARBAJAL@FXI.COMOwner/operator email: 714-637-0110Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STOwner/operator address: LUIS CARBAJALOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STOwner/operator address: FXI INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/01/2010Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: KYLE SUNDANAMOwner/operator name: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 247 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.). Waste name: 212. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. Waste name: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 248 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INCSite name: 07/08/2009Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FXI FOAMEX INNOVATIONSSite name: 08/30/2010Date form received by agency: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FXI INCSite name: 10/09/2012Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 249 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02/27/2006Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: 02/22/2008Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 250 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 02/05/2004Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Unspecified organic liquid mixture. Waste name: 343. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Unspecified aqueous solution. Waste name: 135. Waste code: Alkaline solution without metals (pH > 12.5). Waste name: 122. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 251 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 11/25/1997Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LP - ORANGESite name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: 02/04/2002Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name: F002. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 252 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/10/2009 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/10/2009Date achieved compliance: 06/10/2009Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATIONEvent: 01/01/1990Event date: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 10/04/1989Event date: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 06/01/1988Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 07/21/1980Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: GREAT WESTERN FOAM PRODUCTS CO.Site name: 03/26/1990Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: GREAT WESTERN FOAM PRODUCTSSite name: 02/17/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEXSite name: 03/14/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEXSite name: 03/14/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 11/25/1997Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 253 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/30/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: 12/21/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: F - 268.7Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/30/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: 12/21/1988Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 05/16/1994Date achieved compliance: 07/23/1992Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/27/2006 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/31/2006Date achieved compliance: 06/27/2006Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 254 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/14/2008Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 06/10/2009Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/10/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/10/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/06/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/26/2012Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/11/1987 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: 05/15/1987Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/21/1988Date achieved compliance: 12/01/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 255 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 05/15/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/21/1988Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 12/01/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/21/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/21/1988Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 05/16/1994Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/23/1992Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/16/1994Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 11/25/2003Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/28/2005Evaluation date: LocalEvaluation lead agency: 08/31/2006Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/27/2006Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 256 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/operator address: KYLE SUNDANAMOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 06/01/2009Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 610-744-2300Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: MEDIA, PA 19063 1400 N PROVIDENCE RD STE 200Owner/operator address: FXI INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: LGALLARDO@FXI.COMContact email: 714-685-7287Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STContact address: LIDIA GALLARDOContact: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STMailing address: CAD008352361EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 2060 N BATAVIA STFacility address: FXI, INCFacility name: 01/17/2018Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/15/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 257 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. Waste name: 141. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 08/01/2016Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: LCARBAJAL@FXI.COMOwner/operator email: 714-637-0110Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STOwner/operator address: LUIS CARBAJALOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92865 N BATAVIA STOwner/operator address: FXI INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/01/2010Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 258 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/09/2012Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.). Waste name: 212. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 259 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INCSite name: 07/08/2009Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FXI FOAMEX INNOVATIONSSite name: 08/30/2010Date form received by agency: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FXI INCSite name: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 260 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: 02/27/2006Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: 02/22/2008Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 261 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 02/05/2004Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: 352. Waste code: Unspecified organic liquid mixture. Waste name: 343. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Waste oil and mixed oil. Waste name: 221. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Unspecified aqueous solution. Waste name: 135. Waste code: Alkaline solution without metals (pH > 12.5). Waste name: 122. Waste code: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 262 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 11/25/1997Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LP - ORANGESite name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX, L.P.Site name: 02/04/2002Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name: F002. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 263 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/10/2009 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/10/2009Date achieved compliance: 06/10/2009Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATIONEvent: 01/01/1990Event date: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 10/04/1989Event date: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 06/01/1988Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 07/21/1980Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: GREAT WESTERN FOAM PRODUCTS CO.Site name: 03/26/1990Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: GREAT WESTERN FOAM PRODUCTSSite name: 02/17/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEXSite name: 03/14/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEXSite name: 03/14/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOAMEX LPSite name: 11/25/1997Date form received by agency: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T). Waste name: U223. Waste code: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 264 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/30/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: 12/21/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: F - 268.7Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/30/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: 12/21/1988Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 05/16/1994Date achieved compliance: 07/23/1992Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/27/2006 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/31/2006Date achieved compliance: 06/27/2006Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 265 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/14/2008Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 06/10/2009Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/10/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/10/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/06/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/26/2012Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/11/1987 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: 05/15/1987Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/21/1988Date achieved compliance: 12/01/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 266 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/15/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 05/15/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/21/1988Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 12/01/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/21/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989Date achieved compliance: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/21/1988Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 05/16/1994Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/23/1992Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/16/1994Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 11/25/2003Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/28/2005Evaluation date: LocalEvaluation lead agency: 08/31/2006Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/27/2006Evaluation date: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 267 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/01/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/04/1989Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001567Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280027Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000480122Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD008352361Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8639Longitude: 33.82112Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: Not reportedSenate: Not reportedAssembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * UnknownSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 01/01/2008Status Date: * InactiveStatus: 80001567Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 268 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation VisualLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00025000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92665Owner City,St,Zip: 2060 N. BATAVIA ST.Owner Address: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CHUSION COwner Name: 7146370110Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: MANUFACTUREROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000009108Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E99B.pdfURL: 0002E99BFile Number: HIST UST: 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-16-93Active Date: 25000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-009108-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 08-16-93Action Date: 08-16-93Referral Date: 44-016895Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 9108Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 269 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1615Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 474Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 474Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3069SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1615Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: 3 additional US_TRIS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access TRIS: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92665Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 2060 N BATAVIAMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146370110Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00009108Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30008333Facility ID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: VisualLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1968Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 270 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.3268026107Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3086SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 160916Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2012Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 654Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3069SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1615Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 654Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3069SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1615Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1993Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 4Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 840Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 868Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3069SIC Code: SCAir District Name: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 271 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110000480122Alias: FRSAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD008352361EPA Id: Alias: 09/11/1987Actual Date: Protective Filer Status - PROTECTIVE FILER (RECEIVED)Event Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD008352361EPA Id: 10/11/1988Actual Date: Protective Filer Status - PROTECTIVE FILER (APPROVED)Event Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD008352361EPA Id: Activities: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: Not reportedSenate District: Not reportedAssembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -117.8639Longitude: 33.82112Latitude: PROTECTIVE FILERCleanup Status: CAD008352361EPA Id: HWP: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.98e-005NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 4.995e-006Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.000142588Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.00016607289894Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3086SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 160916Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2013Year: 0.00967168Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.00976Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.0005SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.13159NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.07842Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.28073Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 272 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MediaDischarge City: 1400 N Providence RdDischarge Address: FXI IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 12/19/2011Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I023446WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 422714Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: 19063Discharge Zip: PennsylvaniaDischarge State: MediaDischarge City: FXI IncDischarge Name: 1400 N Providence RdDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: 12/19/2011Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I023446WDID: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: 422714Regulatory Measure ID: 0Agency Number: 8Region: CAS000001NPDES Number: ActiveFacility Status: NPDES: GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYAlias: Alternate NameAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD008352361EPA Id: 30280027Alias: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD008352361EPA Id: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 273 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 19063Discharge Zip: PennsylvaniaDischarge State: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 274 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: lcarbajal@fxi.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-637-0110Operator Contact Phone: Plant ManagerOperator Contact Title: Luis CarbajalOperator Contact: 19063Operator Zip: PennsylvaniaOperator State: MediaOperator City: 1400 N Providence RdOperator Address: FXI IncOperator Name: ddarling@fxi.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-685-7218Contact Phone: Regional EHS ManagerContact Title: Douglas DarlingContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 27Place Size: 12/19/2011Status Date: ActiveStatus: 12/19/2011Processed Date: 12/19/2011Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I023446WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 422714Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 275 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPlace ID: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder Number: 422714Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: 0Agency Number: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 19063Operator Zip: PennsylvaniaOperator State: MediaOperator City: 1400 N Providence RdOperator Address: FXI IncOperator Name: 12/19/2011Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30I023446WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 3086-Plastics Foam ProductsPrimary Sic: 09-FEB-15Certification Date: Regional EHS ManagerCertifier Title: Douglas DarlingCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 276 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: Not reportedDeveloper Zip: Not reportedDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Not reportedOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Not reportedOperator Contact: Not reportedOperator Zip: Not reportedOperator State: Not reportedOperator City: Not reportedOperator Address: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Not reportedContact: Not reportedPlace Size Unit: Not reportedPlace Size: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: Not reportedReceived Date: 19063Discharge Zip: PennsylvaniaDischarge State: MediaDischarge City: 1400 N Providence RdDischarge Address: FXI IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 12/19/2011Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I023446WDID: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 277 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDeveloper Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: Not reportedDeveloper City: Not reportedDeveloper Address: Not reportedDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: lcarbajal@fxi.comOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 714-637-0110Operator Contact Phone: Plant ManagerOperator Contact Title: Luis CarbajalOperator Contact: 19063Operator Zip: PennsylvaniaOperator State: MediaOperator City: 1400 N Providence RdOperator Address: FXI IncOperator Name: ddarling@fxi.comContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 714-685-7218Contact Phone: Regional EHS ManagerContact Title: Douglas DarlingContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 27Place Size: 12/19/2011Status Date: ActiveStatus: 12/19/2011Processed Date: 12/19/2011Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I023446WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 422714Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: Not reportedCertification Date: Not reportedCertifier Title: Not reportedCertifier: Not reportedReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 278 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 3086SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7146370110Agency Telephone: FRED LELVISAgency Contact: ORANGE 92865Agency City,St,Zip: 2060 N BATAVIA STAgency Address: FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INCAgency Name: FRED LELVISFacility Contact: 7146370110Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I011543Facility ID: WDS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: 3086-Plastics Foam ProductsPrimary Sic: 09-FEB-15Certification Date: Regional EHS ManagerCertifier Title: Douglas DarlingCertifier: Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: NDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: Not reportedConstype Recons Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: Not reportedConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: Not reportedEmergency Phone Ext: Not reportedEmergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Not reportedDeveloper Contact: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 TC5509310.2s Page 279 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.8643Longitude: 33.82116Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedTermination Date: 12/19/2011Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000001NPDES Number: 8 30I023446WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrder Number: Storm water industrialRegulatory Measure Type: ActiveRegulatory Measure Status: INDSTWProgram: 8Region: 3086SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Plastics Foam ProductsPlace/Project Type: 1400 N Providence Rd Ste 2000, Media , PA 19063Agency Address: FXI IncAgency: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: FXI INC (Continued)1000158746 404522Site Code: 10/08/2004Status Date: Inactive - WithdrawnStatus: 30000046Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4687 ft. 0.888 mi.CA EMI Relative: Lower Actual: 171 ft. 1/2-1 CA Orange Co. Industrial SiteORANGE, CA 92867 SW CA SCH1465 N. BATAVIA STREET N/A 69 CA ENVIROSTORCOMMUNITY COLLEGE S103631176 TC5509310.2s Page 280 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 30000046Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/08/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/04/2004Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30000046Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404522Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: RANCHO SANTIAGO CCD-COMMUNITY COLLEGEAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: * UNKNOWNPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8613Longitude: 33.81165Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 6.2Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Continued) S103631176 TC5509310.2s Page 281 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RO0003167Record ID: 03IC010Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/08/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/04/2004Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30000046Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404522Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: RANCHO SANTIAGO CCD-COMMUNITY COLLEGEAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: * UNKNOWNPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8613Longitude: 33.81165Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 10/08/2004Status Date: Inactive - WithdrawnStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 37Senate: 68Assembly: 404522Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 6.2Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Continued) S103631176 TC5509310.2s Page 282 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3559SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 8Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3559SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 8Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5199SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: PERCHLOROETHYLENE; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; LEAD COMPOUNDSReleased Chemical: Not reportedClosure Type: OPENCurrent Status: COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Continued) S103631176 TC5509310.2s Page 283 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3599SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3599SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1998Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3599SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1997Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3559SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Continued) S103631176 TC5509310.2s Page 284 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3599SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3599SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 8282Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Continued) S103631176 TC5509310.2s Page 285 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 1 records.ORANGE COUNTY S107537591AT DEAD END OF BLACK STAR CYN, CA CDLTC5509310.2s Page 286 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC5509310.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5509310.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5509310.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 10/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC5509310.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC5509310.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5509310.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5509310.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 09/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 09/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC5509310.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. TC5509310.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 09/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 10/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 08/29/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 08/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 09/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports TC5509310.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. TC5509310.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5509310.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 10/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5509310.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 08/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 08/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5509310.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. TC5509310.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 08/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust TC5509310.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/29/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 08/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. TC5509310.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 09/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 09/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 08/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 10/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. TC5509310.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 10/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 10/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 08/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. TC5509310.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 10/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. TC5509310.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 08/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 09/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. TC5509310.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials Date of Government Version: 10/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 09/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5810 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5509310.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 10/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 10/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 07/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: TC5509310.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 08/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 08/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: TC5509310.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 09/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 07/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC5509310.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 08/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 10/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: TC5509310.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING AOCONCERN: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 10/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 10/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 10/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5509310.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 08/29/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 07/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: TC5509310.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 10/29/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 08/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 07/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5509310.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 07/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 09/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 10/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. TC5509310.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 08/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5509310.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 10/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO. SAM: Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/31/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: TC5509310.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5509310.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 08/29/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 08/29/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: TC5509310.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 09/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list TC5509310.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 09/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5509310.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 09/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 09/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 10/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 11/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 11/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5509310.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/21/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/28/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. TC5509310.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5509310.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING APPENDIX E PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY PRIORITY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (WQMP) For: Cohen Property 305 Grove Ave, Orange, CA 92865 Prepared for: David Cohen Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Avenue Orange, CA 92867 (714) 401-8200 Prepared by: DRC Engineering Inc. Cory Mack, P.E. 160 S. Old Springs Road Suite 210 Anaheim, CA 92808 (714) 685-6860 Date Prepared 5/12/19 Revised 11/20/19 ___________________________________ _________________________ Public Works Director Date ________________________________ _____________________ City Engineer Date OWNER’S CERTIFICATION WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR Cohen Property This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Orange-Cohen Property has been prepared for the Cohen Living Trust. This WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Orange’s Zone Change No. 1297-19, Tentative Parcel Map 2019-100, Major Site Plan Review No. 0969-19, Design Review No. 4969-19, and Environmental Review No. 1865-19 requiring the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to- date conditions on the site consistent with the City of Orange Local Implementation Plan (LIP), and the intent of NPDES Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for the City of Orange, County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. This WQMP will be reviewed with the facility operator, facility supervisors, employees, tenants, maintenance and service contractors, or any other party having responsibility for implementing portions of this WQMP. Maintenance requirements within Section V and Appendix D will be adhered to with particular emphasis on maintaining the BMPs described within Sections IV and V. The Owner’s Annual Self Certification Statement along with a BMP maintenance implementation table will be submitted by June 30th every year following project completion. At least one copy of the approved WQMP shall be available on the subject property in perpetuity. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors-in-interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. The City of Orange will be notified of the change of ownership and the new owner will submit a new certification. Signature: ____________________________ Date: Name: David Cohen_____________________________ Title: Trustee___________________________ ___ Company: Cohen Living Trust____________________ __ Address: 4922 E. Somerton Avenue, Orange, CA 92867 Telephone Number: (714) 401-8200 ______ ____ Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) WQMP Number – As assigned by the City of Orange: Submission of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility constitutes notice to the City that responsibility for the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the subject property identified below, and implementation of that plan, is being transferred from the Previous Owner (and his/her agent) of the site (or portion thereof) to the New Owner, as further described below. I. Owner/ Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual: Cohen Living Trust Contact Person: David Cohen________ Street Address: 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Title: Trustee City: Orange State: CA Zip : 92867 Phone: (714) 401-8200 II. Information about Site Relevant to WQMP Name of Project: Cohen Property Title of WQMP applicable to site: Cohen Property WQMP Street Address of the site: 305 Grove Ave, Orange, CA 92865 Date of Transfer of Responsibility: III. New Owner (Upon Transfer)/ Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual: Contact Person: Street Address: Title: City State Zip Phone: WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 i Table of Contents I. Discretionary Permit Number(s), Water Quality Condition Number(s) and Conditions………………………………………………………………….. 1 II. Project Description………………………………………………………… 2 III. Site Description……………………………………………………………. 4 IV. Best Management Practices……………………………………………… 6 IV.1 Site Design BMPs…………………………………………………. 5 IV.2 Source Control BMPs……………………………………………… 6 IV.3 Hydromodification Control BMPs …………………………………….. 8 IV.4 Drainage Management Areas……………………………………. 8 IV.5 Calculations………………………………………………………… 8 V. Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Responsibility for BMPs (O&M Plan)……………………………………..…………………… 9 VI. Location Map, Site Plan, and BMP Details………………….…………… 12 VII. Educational Materials………………………………………………………. 13 Appendices A. Conditions of Approval, Resolution Number ______ dated _______ B. Educational Material C. BMP Details D. BMP Maintenance Information E. Geotechnical Infiltration Testing (for reference only) F. Hydrology Information (Q2 – Two-year frequency storm evaluation) WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 1 I. Discretionary Permit Number(s), Water Quality Condition Number(s) and Conditions of Approval Tract No____ Lot No.______ GPS Coordinates: 33.82114N 117.85034W Water Quality Conditions (WQMP conditions listed below) A complete copy of the signed Conditions of Approval, Resolution Number _________ dated _________ are included as Appendix A Conditions of Approval: Pending WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 2 II. Project Description Planning Area (Location):_Orange Olive Specific Plan_ Project Site Area (ac): 2.91 (±126,697 SF) Project Disturbed Area (ac): _2.91 (±126,697 SF) Percent Change in Impermeable Surfaces: -11% SIC Code (not applicable) Project Description This project consists of the removal of a multi-use business building and developing the site to a residential neighborhood. Currently the site is 94% impervious. After the site is developed it will be 83% impervious. This is an 11% decrease in impervious area. The site is in an area of soil type “D” and is not a candidate for infiltration. Pervious pavement was not considered as it would not contribute very much to infiltration. New impervious areas will consist of walkways, driveways, drive aisles, sidewalks. There will be no material or waste storage on site. During the post-construction condition, the site will have been regraded for drainage to flow to different specified catch basins and drop inlets. Once this discharge is captured then it will be treated through a Modular Wetlands biofiltration unit on site before the discharge reaches the existing public storm drain line located in Grove Avenue. Please refer to the site map for a comprehensive list of pervious/impervious areas along with the flow path and corresponding square footage. Project Purpose and Activities The purpose of this project is to construct a group of houses that will also contain common use areas to be used for recreation and contain guest parking. There will be a pet waste area for the enjoyment of the residents. Potential Storm Water Pollutants The activities on site include the proposed use as a detached residential development. Pollutants typically generated by this activity include: suspended solid/sediments, nutrients, pathogens (bacteria/virus), pesticides, oil & grease, trash and debris. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern 2 Year Peak Flow Q2 (CFS) 2 Year Volume V2 (CF) Time of Concentration TC (Min) Existing 4.27 0.44 10.36 Proposed 4.79 0.44 10.06 While the peak flow increases with this development, the volume of the 2 year storm remains the same. The post development time of concentration is slightly less than the pre development by 3%. Post Development Drainage Characteristics After the redevelopment of this property, the site will continue to drain to the same city storm drain line as before. On the site the stormwater will drain to catch basins and flow to one of two Modular Wetlands units. These units will filter pollutants from the storm water. Infiltration on site is infeasible. The geotechnical testing shows percolation rates of almost 0. See appendix E for the test results. The units contain overflow weirs to bypass in the case of larger peak flows. The clean storm water then flows to the storm drain in the Grove Avenue. Commercial Projects No commercial/communal food preparation is expected to take place on this site. Residential Projects The approximate home size for each of these condominium units are approximately ±2,000 SF containing a total of 32 units that are detached. Approximately 8,500 SF of the project site is dedicated to open space for neighborhood recreation. Site Ownership and any Easements The property is owned by David Cohen with Cohen Living Trust at (714) 401-8200 in its entirety and there are two easements located to the Northern part of the site. One WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 4 easement belongs to Southern California Edison, and the other belongs to Pacific Telephone and Telegraph. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 5 III. Site Description Site Address: NEC Orange-Olive Rd & Grove Ave Zoning: R3 District Predominant Soil type: D (OC TGD Figure XVI-2b) Pre-project percent pervious: 6% Post-project percent pervious: 17% Pre-project percent impervious: 94% Post-project percent impervious: 83% Site Characteristics The existing site contains a multi-use business building along with another small single business building with approximately 39,900 square feet total. The landscape around the street sides of the site and a few planter islands in the parking area contains approximately 8,200 square feet. There is approximately 79,000 square feet of parking area. Current drainage conditions include that the back side of the site drains towards a drop inlet near the driveway entrance located on Orange-Olive. The rest of the site drains South towards Grove Ave where it goes into those corresponding drop inlets and then discharges off the site draining through curb drains. The soil is highly impermeable. Watershed Characteristics Watershed: Lower Santa Ana River Watershed WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 6 Downstream Receiving Waters: Bitterbush Channel - Santa Ana River Reach 2 – Reach 1 – Pacific Ocean Water Quality Impairments: Santa Ana River reach 2 is listed on the 2010 303(d) list for indicator bacteria and was delisted in 2016. Identify hydromodification susceptibility: The volume of the 2 year storm remains the same after development. The post development time of concentration is slightly less than the pre development by 3%. Therefore this project does not have a hydraulic condition of concern. The stormwater drains to the Bitterbush channel to the Santa Ana River and to the Pacific Ocean. Identify watershed management priorities: No identified management priorities aside from trash and debris and bacteria reduction. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 7 IV. Best Management Practices IV.1 Site Design and Drainage Characteristics Table 1 Site Design BMPs Technique Included? If no, state justification. Yes No Minimize Directly Connected Impervious Areas (DCIAs) (C-Factor Reduction) X Create Reduced or “Zero Discharge” Areas (Runoff Volume Reduction)1 X The soil on this site is highly impermeable. Minimize Impervious Area/Maximize Permeability (C-Factor Reduction)2 X Conserve Natural Areas (C-Factor Reduction) X This is a developed area with no natural areas to protect in place. 1 Detention and retention areas incorporated into landscape design provide areas for retaining and detaining stormwater flows, resulting in lower runoff rates and reductions in volume due to limited infiltration and evaporation. Such Site Design BMPs may reduce the size of Treatment Control BMPs. 2 The “C Factor” is a representation of the ability of a surface to produce runoff. Surfaces that produce higher volumes of runoff are represented by higher C Factors. By incorporating more pervious, lower C Factor surfaces into a development, lower volumes of runoff will be produced. Lower volumes and rates of runoff translate directly to lowering treatment requirements. Minimize Directly Connected Impervious Areas (DCIAs) (C-Factor Reduction): Inclusion of landscaped areas in the site design is used to minimize directly connected impervious areas. This will reduce runoff, as some of the flows will have the potential to infiltrate into the soil within the existing landscaped area. Infiltration of some of the flows will also help to remove sediment/turbidity, nutrients, oxygen demanding substances, and bacteria/viruses from stormwater. Minimize Impervious Area/Maximize Permeability (C-Factor Reduction) Site has been designed with the most landscape and pervious areas possible while still maintaining the actual purpose of the construction. The proposed site percentage pervious areas increase from 6% to 17%. The outdoor areas are designed with some concrete areas for aesthetic and accessible purposes, but large landscaping areas are included between the hardscape. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 8 IV.2 Source Control BMPs IV.2.1 Routine Non-Structural BMPs Table 2 Routine Non-Structural BMPs BMP No. Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason. Included Not Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants X N2 Activity Restriction X N3 Common Area Landscape Management X N4 BMP Maintenance X N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance X N6 Local Water Quality Permit Compliance X This BMP is not applicable. The City of Orange does not issue water quality permits. N7 Spill Contingency Plan X No hazardous chemicals to be present on this site N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance X No underground storage N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance X No hazardous chemicals to be present on this site N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation X N11 Common Area Litter Control X N12 Employee Training X N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks X No loading docks on site N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection X N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots X N1. Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Proper education of onsite occupants will help to reduce all potential and anticipated pollutants from the site. Practical information shall be provided by the property owner to the employees on general good housekeeping BMPs and other practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality. Prior to sell of land, the current property owner will provide a copy of the WQMP to the future property owner. This WQMP shall be provided with emphasis placed on the materials included in, but not limited to, Sections IV, V VI and VII of this report. For additional information, see BMP SC-10, Non-Stormwater Discharges, included in appendix B and the BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 9 Matrix in Section V. Education Materials to be used include, but are not limited to, SC-10, Non-Stormwater Discharges and City of Orange LIP Section A-5. N2. Activity Restrictions Onsite activities shall be in compliance with city of Orange Municipal Code at all times. The CC&R’s may include additional restrictions. Some general activity restrictions that shall be adhered to are: o No discharges of fertilizer, pesticides and wastes to streets or storm drains o No blowing or sweeping of debris into streets or storm drains. o No hosing down of paved surfaces o No vehicle fueling, washing, or maintenance. N3. Common Area Landscape Management. All maintenance shall be consistent with the City of Orange Water Quality Ordinance. Proper landscape maintenance practices will help to reduce or eliminate pollution from pesticides, nutrients, trash/debris, and sediments. General guidelines include the following: Plant vegetation that reduces water, fertilizer, herbicide, and pesticide use. Waste shall be disposed of by composting or at a permitted landfill and shall not be raked or blown into the street, gutter, or storm drains. Irrigation systems shall be inspected monthly for poorly aligned sprinkler heads, broken sprinkler heads, and leaks. Detected problems shall be repaired as soon as they are observed. Avoid over- watering of vegetation. If excessive runoff is observed, automatic timers shall be adjusted. For approximate irrigation levels and scheduling, refer to the Irrigation Scheduling Data in Appendix D. Note that the actual irrigation schedule and levels may vary based on soil type, maturity of vegetation, exposure, and seasonal conditions. If fertilizer is spilled on a paved surface it should be swept up immediately and placed in its container. Water shall not be used to clean fertilizer spills unless necessary and only after the area has been thoroughly cleaned using dry cleaning methods. Pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers shall not be applied within 48 hours prior to rain or if wind speeds exceed 5 mph. Pesticides shall be applied only as a last resort and after other pest mitigation efforts have been attempted. Non-pesticide mitigation measures include cultural tactics (modifying routine landscape activities, adjusting the amount of irrigation applied to the area, etc.), mechanical tactics (mulching and manual removal of weeds and larger pests such as snails), environmental/ physical tactics (netting, etc.), and biological tactics (using living organisms such as lady bugs and herbivores to control pests). Storage of pesticides shall be away from living areas and in a covered area that is not subject to temperature extremes. For additional information, see BMP SC-41, Building & Grounds Maintenance, SC-73, Landscape Maintenance, and BMP SD-10, Site Design and Landscape Planning, included in Section VII and the BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix in Section V. Also refer to Water Quality Guidelines for Landscaping and Gardening included in Section VII and the City of Orange LIP section A- 5, a copy of which is included in Section VII. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 10 N4. BMP Maintenance Selected BMPs will be maintained to ensure proper operation and daily function as applicable. See the BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix in Section V and Appendix D for details. Appropriate BMP Maintenance practices will help to reduce all pollutants from the site. N10. Uniform Fire Code Implementation The owner is responsible to ensure that all hazardous waste material storage is in conformance with the local fire authority’s implementation of Article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code. N11. Common Area Litter Control The owner shall implement trash management and litter control procedures aimed at reducing pollution of storm water runoff due to trash and debris. The owner will contract with a maintenance firm to provide regularly scheduled landscape maintenance and parking lot maintenance that will include litter removal, emptying of trash receptacles, and picking up of grass and plant clippings. All trash containers must be covered to prevent storm water from entering. For additional information, see BMP SC-41, Building & Grounds Maintenance, and SC-43, Parking Storage Area Maintenance, included in Appendix B. Also see the BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix in Appendix B. N12. Employee Training Ensuring that employees are properly trained will help to reduce all anticipated and potential pollutants from the site. All new employees will be trained upon hire and annually thereafter on how to minimize impacts to water quality. The educational materials provided in Appendix B will be reviewed. For additional information, see the BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix in Appendix B. N14. Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Proper maintenance of the onsite catch basins will help to reduce the amount of trash/debris and silt/sediment in runoff. The onsite catch basins shall be inspected and cleared of any trash or debris in or around the opening prior to the rainy season (by October 1st). Thereafter, inspections will be conducted every four months. All on-site catch basins shall be stenciled with “No Dumping Drains to Ocean”. Also see the Maintenance Responsibility/ Frequency Matrix in Section V. N15. Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 11 The private streets and parking areas shall be swept twice a month or more often as needed using mechanical sweepers and/or vacuum sweepers to remove debris. For additional information, see BMP SC-43, Parking/Storage Area Maintenance included in Appendix B. Also see the Maintenance Responsibility/ Frequency Matrix in Section V. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 12 IV.2.2 Routine Structural BMPs Table 3 Routine Structural BMPs Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage- “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean” X Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction X No material storage on site Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction X No trash and waste storage areas on site. All trash and waste is individual carts at each house. The common areas also have individual carts. Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design X Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation X No slopes or channels on site. Incorporate requirements applicable to individual project features X None of the items on this list exist on the site. a. Dock areas b. Maintenance bays c. Vehicle or community wash areas d. Outdoor processing areas e. Equipment wash areas f. Fueling areas g. Hillside landscaping h. Wash water control for food preparation areas Provide Storm Drain Stenciling and Signage The existing catch basin will be stenciled with the phrase “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean”. Storm drain signage will help to reduce all pollution. The storm drain signage shall be inspected once per year for legibility and re-stenciled as necessary. See BMP SD-13, Storm Drain Signage, in Appendix B and the BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix in Section V. Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 13 All landscape maintenance shall be consistent with the City of Orange Water Quality Ordinance. Efficient irrigation practices will help to reduce pollution due to pesticides, nutrients, and sediments. General guidelines include the following: Plant vegetation that reduces water, fertilizer, herbicide, and pesticide use. Group plants with similar water requirements in order to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. See BMP SC-41, Building and Grounds Maintenance, in Section VII and the BMP Maintenance Responsibility/Frequency Matrix in Section V. Also refer to the City of Orange LIP Section A-5. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 14 IV.3 Low Impact Development BMP Selection Refer to Section 2.4.2.3 and 4.1 in the TGD for selecting LID BMPs. IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls Select from the following table all hydrologic source control BMPs that are used by the project and identify in Site Plan. See Section 4.2 of Technical Guidance Document for additional information. Table 4 Hydrologic Source Control BMPs Name Check If Used Localized on-lot infiltration Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) Green roofs/Brown roofs Blue roofs Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 15 IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Identify infiltration BMPs to be used in project. See Section 2.4.2.4 of the Technical Guidance Document for infiltration infeasibility criteria and 4.3 for information of BMP selection. Table 5 Infiltration BMPs Name Check If Used Bioretention without underdrains Rain gardens Porous landscaping Infiltration planters Retention swales Infiltration trenches Infiltration basins Drywells Subsurface infiltration galleries French drains Permeable asphalt Permeable concrete Permeable concrete pavers Other: Other: *Infiltration BMP(s), i.e. infiltration trenches and basins, etc., require pre-treatment prior to infiltration Infiltration on this site is not feasible as the infiltration rate is almost 0 and the soil type is D. O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y RI V E R S I D E C O U N T Y RI V E R S I D E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y SA N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SA N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYP:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Reports\InfiltrationFeasability_20110215\9526E_FigureXVI-2b_D-Soils_20110215.mxdFIGUREXVI-2bJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 milesDESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP02/09/11DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYINFILTRATION STUDYORANGE CO.CAHYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP TYPE D NRCS SOIL SURVEYSUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION Source: D Soils: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)Soil Survey - soil_ca678, Orange County & Western RiversideDate of publication: 2006-02-08 !I 0 3.6 7.21.8 Miles 0 5 102.5 Kilometers LEGEND City Boundaries Hydrologic Soil Groups D Soils http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 1 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk for groundwater related concerns? Refer to Appendix VII (Worksheet I) for guidance on groundwater-related infiltration feasibility criteria. X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 2 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk of increasing risk of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level? (Yes if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert): · The BMP can only be located less than 50 feet away from slopes steeper than 15 percent · The BMP can only be located less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback. · A study prepared by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study substantiates that stormwater infiltration would potentially result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level. X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 3 Would infiltration of the DCV from drainage area violate downstream water rights? X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Partial Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 4 Is proposed infiltration facility located on HSG D soils or the site geotechnical investigation identifies presence of soil characteristics which support categorization as D soils? X Provide basis: See attached Soils Map XVI-2b 5 Is measured infiltration rate below proposed facility less than 0.3 inches per hour? This calculation shall be based on the methods described in Appendix VII. X Provide basis: See attached percolation tests in soils report Appendix E 6 Would reduction of over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X 7 Would an increase in infiltration over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Infiltration Screening Results (check box corresponding to result): 8 Is there substantial evidence that infiltration from the project would result in a significant increase in I&I to the sanitary sewer that cannot be sufficiently mitigated? (See Appendix XVII) Provide narrative discussion and supporting evidence: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 9 If any answer from row 1-3 is yes: infiltration of any volume is not feasible within the DMA or equivalent. Provide basis: Summarize findings of infeasibility screening 10 If any answer from row 4-7 is yes, infiltration is permissible but is not presumed to be feasible for the entire DCV. Criteria for designing biotreatment BMPs to achieve the maximum feasible infiltration and ET shall apply. Provide basis: Items 4 and 5 are “yes”. The site is located in soils area D per the Soils Map XVI-2b. The testing done by the soils engineer shows the infiltration rate to be almost 0. Because of this the soils engineer has recommended against infiltration. See attached percolation tests in soils report Appendix E. X 11 If all answers to rows 1 through 11 are no, infiltration of the full DCV is potentially feasible, BMPs must be designed to infiltrate the full DCV to the maximum extent practicable. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 16 IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs Identify any evapotranspiration and/or, rainwater harvesting BMPs used by the project See Section 4.4 and 4.4 of the Technical Guidance Document for additional information. (Delete if not used). Table 6 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMP Name Check If Used All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 Surface-based infiltration BMPs Biotreatment BMPs Above-ground cisterns and basins Underground detention Other: Other: Other: Harvesting of rain water is not practical since the landscape area and the demand for toilet flushing is not enough. O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y RI V E R S I D E C O U N T Y RI V E R S I D E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y SA N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SA N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY1.05 0.7 1 0 . 9 50.90.850.80.750 . 70.65 0.9 5 0.70.90.9 0.7 5 P:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Reports\InfiltrationFeasability_20110215\9526E_FigureXVI-1_RainfallZones_20110215.mxdFIGUREJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 milesDESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP04/22/10DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYTECHNICAL GUIDANCEDOCUMENTORANGE CO.CARAINFALL ZONESSUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION 0 3.6 7.21.8 Miles 0 6 123Kilometers LEGEND Orange County Precipitation Stations 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) - Extrapolated City Boundaries Rainfall Zones Design Capture Storm Depth (inches) 0.65" 0.7 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.10" Note: Events defined as 24-hour periods (calendar days) with greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall. For areas outside of available data coverage, professional judgment shall be applied. XVI-1 Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2) Tc= 5 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (Tc) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I1 I1= .26 in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2 (Worksheet A) Y2= % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I2 I2= 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, Idesign= I1-I2 Idesign= .26 Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 2 1.83 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= . 0.9 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= . 0.83 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdesign= D 0.40 cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: DMA-1 Provide time of concentration assumptions: Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2) Tc= 5 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (Tc) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I1 I1= .26 in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2 (Worksheet A) Y2= % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I2 I2= 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, Idesign= I1-I2 Idesign= .26 Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 2 1.08 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= . 0.9 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= . 0.83 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdesign= D 0.23 cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: DMA-2 Provide time of concentration assumptions: WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 17 IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs Table 7 Biotreatment BMPs Bioretention with underdrains Storm water planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains Constructed wetlands Vegetated swales Vegetated filter strips Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems Wet extended detention basin Dry extended detention basins Other: Other: The Modular Wetlands System incorporates an advanced pretreatment chamber that includes separation and pre-filter cartridges. In this chamber, sediment and hydrocarbons are removed from runoff before entering the biofiltration chamber, reducing maintenance costs and improving performance. Horizontal flow also gives the system the unique ability to adapt to the environment through a variety of configurations, bypass orientations, and diversion applications. The Modular Wetlands System includes a high flow bypass WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 18 IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Not used on this project. IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Not used on this project. IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Not used on this project. IV. 4 Water Quality Credits Not used on this project. IV.5 Alternative Compliance Plan Not used on this project. IV.6 Vector Control The modular wetlands contain drains at the bottom of the units and should not have standing water. This will eliminate the opportunity for vectors to thrive. IV.7 Drainage Management Area (DMA) Describe each DMA used in project, the BMPs in each DMA and the area treated. DMA Number BMPs Area Treated 1 Area 100 Modular Wetlands MWS-L-8-16 1.83 Acres 2 Area 110 Modular Wetlands MWS-L-4-19 1.08 Acres 3 Total Project Area 2.91 Acres WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 19 IV.8 Calculations Provide calculations for all LID, Structural and Treatment BMPs selected. All calculations must be signed by a registered civil engineer. Individual or worksheets provided in Technical Guidance Document (if applicable) may be used. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 20 V. Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Responsibility for BMPs (O&M Plan) Responsible Party Information (Local Contact Information) Name: _David Cohen___________________ Title: Trustee_ Company: Cohen Trust Phone Number: (714) 401-8200_ Table 8 - Frequency Inspection Matrix BMP Responsible Party Maintenance Activity Inspection/Maintenance. Frequency Source Control BMPs (Structural and Non-Structural) S1 Provide Storm Drain System Stenciling and Signage Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 Contact: David Cohen Employees shall periodically check stencils located adjacent to storm drain inlets. The owner shall maintain the stencils to ensure they are legible. Every 6 months S3 Obtain trash Enclosures that reduce pollutant introduction Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 Contact: David Cohen Owners shall maintain all trash receptacles to ensure they are lined to reduce leaking of liquid waste. All trash receptacles located outside shall have lids to prevent rainfall from entering. Ongoing N1 Education of Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 Contact: David Cohen Education of current employees/owner(s) shall be done within 4 weeks of startup with each new onsite employee/owner(s) being given a water quality orientation using this WQMP as reference within two weeks of hire date. Ongoing with refresh instruction given on an annual basis. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 21 N2 Activity Restrictions Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 (714)-401-8200 Contact: David Cohen There shall be no discharges of fertilizer, pesticides, or wastes to streets or storm drains. There shall be no blowing or sweeping of debris into storm drain. All activities shall remain in compliance with OMC and any CC&R’s, at all times. Ongoing. N3 Common Area Landscape Management Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 (714)-401-8200 Contact: David Cohen Landscape maintenance will consist of trimming and replanting of vegetation, repair and maintenance of irrigation systems, and appropriate use of fertilizers and pesticides. Landscape maintenance shall be performed on a weekly basis. Irrigation systems shall be inspected monthly for leaks. Leaks shall be repaired as soon as they are observed. N4 BMP Maintenance Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 (714)-401-8200 Contact: David Cohen The proposed treatment BMPs will be maintained as outlined in Appendix D of this report. As outlined in Appendix D of this report. N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 (714)-401-8200 Contact: David Cohen The owner and tenant are to keep records of all steps taken to meet local fire department requirements for hazardous material storage and records of hazardous material disposal. As necessary to meet local fire department requirements. N11 Common Area Litter Control Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 Contact: David Cohen The owner will contract with a maintenance firm to provide weekly landscape maintenance and parking lot maintenance that will include litter removal and picking up grass and plant clippings. During routine maintenance all trash and debris will be picked up and placed in waste receptacle. Weekly N12 Employee Training Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 Contact: David Cohen Education of current employees shall be done within 4 weeks of startup with each new onsite employee being Ongoing with refresh instruction given on an annual basis. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 22 given a water quality orientation using this WQMP as reference within two weeks of hire date. Low Impact Development and Treatment BMPs Modular Wetlands Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Ave. Orange, CA 92867 Contact: David Cohen Ongoing Regulatory Permits Because this project is larger than one acre the site shall be in compliance with the State of California Construction General Permit (CGP) and the WDID that will be obtained before construction begins. Funding The Cohen Living Trust will be responsible for the funding of all onsite BMPs through it’s operating budget. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 23 OWNER SELF CERTIFICATION STATEMENT As the owner representative of Orange-Olive and Grove for which a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was approved by the City, I hereby certify under penalty of law that all Best Management Practices contained within the approved Project WQMP have been maintained and inspected in accordance with the schedule and frequency outlined in the approved WQMP Maintenance Table. The maintenance activities and inspections conducted are shown in the attached table and have been performed by qualified and knowledgeable individuals. Structural Treatment BMPs have been inspected and certified by a licensed professional engineer. To the best of my knowledge, the information submitted is true and accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and citations for violating water quality regulations. Signed: _________________________________ ___ Name: David Cohen___________________________ Title: Trustee__________________________ _ Company: Cohen Living Trust_________________ ___ Address: 4922 E. Somerton Avenue, Orange, CA 92867 Telephone Number: (714) 401-8200 ______ ____ Date: _________________ WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 24 BMP Implementation Tracking Table BMP Activity Completion Dates or Frequency Initial Source Control BMPs (Structural and Nonstructural) Low Impact Development and Treatment BMPs * This sheet is to be submitted annually with the Owner Self Certification Statement. ** Structural Treatment BMPs should be certified by a Licensed Professional Engineer. WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 25 VI. Location Map, Site Plan, and BMP Details LOCATION MAP WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 26 VII. Educational Materials Refer to the City’s website www.cityoforange.org or the Orange County Stormwater Program (ocwatersheds.com) for a library of materials available. Attach only the educational materials specifically applicable to the project. Education Materials Residential Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips Other Material Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System Responsible Pest Control Sewer Spill Response Tips for the Home Improvement Projects Tips for Horse Care Tips for Landscaping and Gardening Tips for Pet Care Tips for Pool Maintenance Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 27 Appendix A: Conditions of Approval Resolution Number____________ dated__________ WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 28 Appendix B: Educational Material WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 29 Appendix C: BMP Details Modular Wetlands® System Linear A Stormwater Biofiltration Solution A Forterra Company 85% 64% REMOVAL OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL OF TSS 45%67 % REMOVAL OF ORTHO PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL OF NITROGEN 66% REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED ZINC 38% REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED COPPER 69 % REMOVAL OF TOTAL ZINC 50% REMOVAL OF TOTAL COPPER 95% REMOVAL OF MOTOR OIL OVERVIEW The Bio Clean Modular Wetlands® System Linear represents a pioneering breakthrough in stormwater technology as the only biofiltration system to utilize patented horizontal flow, allowing for a smaller footprint, higher treatment capacity, and a wide range of versatility. While most biofilters use little or no pretreatment, the Modular Wetlands® incorporates an advanced pretreatment chamber that includes separation and pre-filter cartridges. In this chamber, sediment and hydrocarbons are removed from runoff before entering the biofiltration chamber, reducing maintenance costs and improving performance. Horizontal flow also gives the system the unique ability to adapt to the environment through a variety of configurations, bypass orientations, and diversion applications. The Urban Impact For hundreds of years, natural wetlands surrounding our shores have played an integral role as nature’s stormwater treatment system. But as cities grow and develop, our environment’s natural filtration systems are blanketed with impervious roads, rooftops, and parking lots. Bio Clean understands this loss and has spent years re-establishing nature’s presence in urban areas, and rejuvenating waterways with the Modular Wetlands® System Linear. APPROVALS The Modular Wetlands® System Linear has successfully met years of challenging technical reviews and testing from some of the most prestigious and demanding agencies in the nation and perhaps the world. Here is a list of some of the most high-profile approvals, certifications, and verifications from around the country. VA Washington State Department of Ecology TAPE Approved The MWS Linear is approved for General Use Level Designation (GULD) for Basic, Enhanced, and Phosphorus treatment at 1 gpm/ft2 loading rate. The highest performing BMP on the market for all main pollutant categories. California Water Resources Control Board, Full Capture Certification The Modular Wetlands® System is the first biofiltration system to receive certification as a full capture trash treatment control device. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Assignment The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality assigned the MWS Linear the highest phosphorus removal rating for manufactured treatment devices to meet the new Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) regulation technical criteria. Maryland Department of the Environment, Approved ESD Granted Environmental Site Design (ESD) status for new construction, redevelopment, and retrofitting when designed in accordance with the design manual. MASTEP Evaluation The University of Massachusetts at Amherst – Water Resources Research Center issued a technical evaluation report noting removal rates up to 84% TSS, 70% total phosphorus, 68.5% total zinc, and more. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, Approved BMP Approved as an authorized BMP and noted to achieve the following minimum removal efficiencies: 85% TSS, 60% pathogens, 30% total phosphorus, and 30% total nitrogen. ADVANTAGES • FLOW CONTROL • NO DEPRESSED PLANTER AREA • AUTO DRAINDOWN MEANS NO MOSQUITO VECTOR • HORIZONTAL FLOW BIOFILTRATION • GREATER FILTER SURFACE AREA • PRETREATMENT CHAMBER • PATENTED PERIMETER VOID AREA PERFORMANCE The Modular Wetlands® continues to outperform other treatment methods with superior pollutant removal for TSS, heavy metals, nutrients, hydrocarbons, and bacteria. Since 2007 the Modular Wetlands® has been field tested on numerous sites across the country and is proven to effectively remove pollutants through a combination of physical, chemical, and biological filtration processes. In fact, the Modular Wetlands® harnesses some of the same biological processes found in natural wetlands in order to collect, transform, and remove even the most harmful pollutants. CA OPERATION The Modular Wetlands® System Linear is the most efficient and versatile biofiltration system on the market, and it is the only system with horizontal flow which: • Improves performance • Reduces footprint • Minimizes maintenance Figure 1 & Figure 2 illustrate the invaluable benefits of horizontal flow and the multiple treatment stages. Cartridge Housing Pre-filter Cartridge Curb Inlet Figure 1Individual Media Filters HORIZONTAL FLOW • Less clogging than downward flow biofilters • Water flow is subsurface • Improves biological filtration PATENTED PERIMETER VOID AREA • Vertically extends void area between the walls and the WetlandMEDIA™ on all four sides • Maximizes surface area of the media for higher treatment capacity WETLANDMEDIA • Contains no organics and removes phosphorus • Greater surface area and 48% void space • Maximum evapotranspiration • High ion exchange capacity and lightweight FLOW CONTROL • Orifice plate controls flow of water through WetlandMEDIA™ to a level lower than the media’s capacity • Extends the life of the media and improves performance DRAINDOWN FILTER • The draindown is an optional feature that completely drains the pretreatment chamber • Water that drains from the pretreatment chamber between storm events will be treated 2x to 3x more surface area than traditional downward flow bioretention systems.Figure 2, Top View SEPARATION • Trash, sediment, and debris are separated before entering the pre-filter cartridges • Designed for easy maintenance access PRE-FILTER CARTRIDGES • Over 25 sq. ft. of surface area per cartridge • Utilizes BioMediaGREEN™ filter material • Removes over 80% of TSS and 90% of hydrocarbons • Prevents pollutants that cause clogging from migrating to the biofiltration chamber 2 DISCHARGE3 BIOFILTRATION2PRETREATMENT1 PERIMETER V O I D A R E A Flow Control RiserDraindown Line Outlet Pipe Vertical Underdrain Manifold BioMediaGREEN™ WetlandMEDIA™ 1 3 CONFIGURATIONS The Modular Wetlands® System Linear is the preferred biofiltration system of civil engineers across the country due to its versatile design. This highly versatile system has available “pipe-in” options on most models, along with built-in curb or grated inlets for simple integration into your storm drain design. CURB TYPE The Curb Type configuration accepts sheet flow through a curb opening and is commonly used along roadways and parking lots. It can be used in sump or flow-by conditions. Length of curb opening varies based on model and size. GRATE TYPE The Grate Type configuration offers the same features and benefits as the Curb Type but with a grated/drop inlet above the systems pretreatment chamber. It has the added benefit of allowing pedestrian access over the inlet. ADA-compliant grates are available to assure easy and safe access. The Grate Type can also be used in scenarios where runoff needs to be intercepted on both sides of landscape islands. DOWNSPOUT TYPE The Downspout Type is a variation of the Vault Type and is designed to accept a vertical downspout pipe from rooftop and podium areas. Some models have the option of utilizing an internal bypass, simplifying the overall design. The system can be installed as a raised planter, and the exterior can be stuccoed or covered with other finishes to match the look of adjacent buildings. VAULT TYPE The system’s patented horizontal flow biofilter is able to accept inflow pipes directly into the pretreatment chamber, meaning the Modular Wetlands® can be used in end-of-the-line installations. This greatly improves feasibility over typical decentralized designs that are required with other biofiltration/ bioretention systems. Another benefit of the “pipe-in” design is the ability to install the system downstream of underground detention systems to meet water quality volume requirements. ORIENTATIONS INTERNAL BYPASS WEIR (SIDE-BY-SIDE ONLY) The Side-By-Side orientation places the pretreatment and discharge chambers adjacent to one another allowing for integration of internal bypass. The wall between these chambers can act as a bypass weir when flows exceed the system’s treatment capacity, thus allowing bypass from the pretreatment chamber directly to the discharge chamber. EXTERNAL DIVERSION WEIR STRUCTURE This traditional offline diversion method can be used with the Modular Wetlands® in scenarios where runoff is being piped to the system. These simple and effective structures are generally configured with two outflow pipes. The first is a smaller pipe on the upstream side of the diversion weir - to divert low flows over to the Modular Wetlands® for treatment. The second is the main pipe that receives water once the system has exceeded treatment capacity and water flows over the weir. FLOW-BY-DESIGN This method is one in which the system is placed just upstream of a standard curb or grate inlet to intercept the first flush. Higher flows simply pass by the Modular Wetlands® and into the standard inlet downstream. END-TO-END The End-To-End orientation places the pretreatment and discharge chambers on opposite ends of the biofiltration chamber, therefore minimizing the width of the system to 5 ft. (outside dimension). This orientation is perfect for linear projects and street retrofits where existing utilities and sidewalks limit the amount of space available for installation. One limitation of this orientation is that bypass must be external. SIDE-BY-SIDE The Side-By-Side orientation places the pretreatment and discharge chamber adjacent to one another with the biofiltration chamber running parallel on either side. This minimizes the system length, providing a highly compact footprint. It has been proven useful in situations such as streets with directly adjacent sidewalks, as half of the system can be placed under that sidewalk. This orientation also offers internal bypass options as discussed below. DVERT LOW FLOW DIVERSION This simple yet innovative diversion trough can be installed in existing or new curb and grate inlets to divert the first flush to the Modular Wetlands® via pipe. It works similar to a rain gutter and is installed just below the opening into the inlet. It captures the low flows and channels them over to a connecting pipe exiting out the wall of the inlet and leading to the MWS Linear. The DVERT is perfect for retrofit and green street applications that allow the Modular Wetlands® to be installed anywhere space is available. DVERT Trough BYPASS MODEL #DIMENSIONS WETLANDMEDIA SURFACE AREA (sq. ft.) TREATMENT FLOW RATE (cfs) MWS-L-4-4 4’ x 4’23 0.052 MWS-L-4-6 4’ x 6’32 0.073 MWS-L-4-8 4’ x 8’50 0.115 MWS-L-4-13 4’ x 13’63 0.144 MWS-L-4-15 4’ x 15’76 0.175 MWS-L-4-17 4’ x 17’90 0.206 MWS-L-4-19 4’ x 19’103 0.237 MWS-L-4-21 4’ x 21’117 0.268 MWS-L-6-8 7’ x 9’64 0.147 MWS-L-8-8 8’ x 8’100 0.230 MWS-L-8-12 8’ x 12’151 0.346 MWS-L-8-16 8’ x 16’201 0.462 MWS-L-8-20 9’ x 21’252 0.577 MWS-L-8-24 9’ x 25’302 0.693 MWS-L-10-20 10' x 20'302 0.693 VOLUME-BASED DESIGNS HORIZONTAL FLOW BIOFILTRATION ADVANTAGE The Modular Wetlands® System Linear offers a unique advantage in the world of biofiltration due to its exclusive horizontal flow design: Volume-Based Design. No other biofilter has the ability to be placed downstream of detention ponds, extended dry detention basins, underground storage systems and permeable paver reservoirs. The systems horizontal flow configuration and built-in orifice control allows it to be installed with just 6” of fall between inlet and outlet pipe for a simple connection to projects with shallow downstream tie- in points. In the example above, the Modular Wetlands® is installed downstream of underground box culvert storage. Designed for the water quality volume, the Modular Wetlands® will treat and discharge the required volume within local draindown time requirements. DESIGN SUPPORT Bio Clean engineers are trained to provide you with superior support for all volume sizing configurations throughout the country. Our vast knowledge of state and local regulations allow us to quickly and efficiently size a system to maximize feasibility. Volume control and hydromodification regulations are expanding the need to decrease the cost and size of your biofiltration system. Bio Clean will help you realize these cost savings with the Modular Wetlands®, the only biofilter than can be used downstream of storage BMPs. SPECIFICATIONS FLOW-BASED DESIGNS The Modular Wetlands® System Linear can be used in stand-alone applications to meet treatment flow requirements. Since the Modular Wetlands® is the only biofiltration system that can accept inflow pipes several feet below the surface, it can be used not only in decentralized design applications but also as a large central end-of-the-line application for maximum feasibility. ADVANTAGES • BUILT-IN ORIFICE CONTROL STRUCTURE • WORKS WITH DEEP INSTALLATIONS • LOWER COST THAN FLOW-BASED DESIGN • MEETS LID REQUIREMENTS Modular Wetlands® with Arch Plastic Chambers Modular Wetlands® with Box Culvert Prestorage PLANT SELECTION Abundant plants, trees, and grasses bring value and an aesthetic benefit to any urban setting, but those in the Modular Wetlands® System Linear do even more - they increase pollutant removal. What’s not seen, but very important, is that below grade, the stormwater runoff/flow is being subjected to nature’s secret weapon: a dynamic physical, chemical, and biological process working to break down and remove non-point source pollutants. The flow rate is controlled in the Modular Wetlands®, giving the plants more contact time so that pollutants are more successfully decomposed, volatilized, and incorporated into the biomass of the Modular Wetlands’® micro/macro flora and fauna. A wide range of plants are suitable for use in the Modular Wetlands®, but selections vary by location and climate. View suitable plants by visiting biocleanenvironmental.com/plants. INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE The Modular Wetlands® is simple, easy to install, and has a space-efficient design that offers lower excavation and installation costs compared to traditional tree-box type systems. The structure of the system resembles precast catch basin or utility vaults and is installed in a similar fashion. The system is delivered fully assembled for quick installation. Generally, the structure can be unloaded and set in place in 15 minutes. Our experienced team of field technicians is available to supervise installations and provide technical support. Reduce your maintenance costs, man hours, and materials with the Modular Wetlands®. Unlike other biofiltration systems that provide no pretreatment, the Modular Wetlands® is a self-contained treatment train which incorporates simple and effective pretreatment. Maintenance requirements for the biofilter itself are almost completely eliminated, as the pretreatment chamber removes and isolates trash, sediments, and hydrocarbons. What’s left is the simple maintenance of an easily accessible pretreatment chamber that can be cleaned by hand or with a standard vac truck. Only periodic replacement of low-cost media in the pre-filter cartridges is required for long-term operation, and there is absolutely no need to replace expensive biofiltration media. INDUSTRIAL Many states enforce strict regulations for discharges from industrial sites. The Modular Wetlands® has helped various sites meet difficult EPA-mandated effluent limits for dissolved metals and other pollutants. PARKING LOTS Parking lots are designed to maximize space and the Modular Wetlands’® 4 ft. standard planter width allows for easy integration into parking lot islands and other landscape medians. MIXED USE The Modular Wetlands® can be installed as a raised planter to treat runoff from rooftops or patios, making it perfect for sustainable “live-work” spaces. RESIDENTIAL Low to high density developments can benefit from the versatile design of the Modular Wetlands®. The system can be used in both decentralized LID design and cost-effective end-of-the-line configurations. STREETS Street applications can be challenging due to limited space. The Modular Wetlands® is very adaptable, and it offers the smallest footprint to work around the constraints of existing utilities on retrofit projects. COMMERCIAL Compared to bioretention systems, the Modular Wetlands® can treat far more area in less space, meeting treatment and volume control requirements. APPLICATIONS The Modular Wetlands® System Linear has been successfully used on numerous new construction and retrofit projects. The system’s superior versatility makes it beneficial for a wide range of stormwater and waste water applications - treating rooftops, streetscapes, parking lots, and industrial sites. More applications include: • Agriculture • Reuse • Low Impact Development • Waste Water A Forterra Company 122018R1A 5796 Armada Drive Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008 855.566.3938 stormwater@forterrabp.com biocleanenvironmental.com STANDARD DETAIL STORMWATER BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM MWS-L-4-19-V PLAN VIEW ELEVATION VIEW RIGHT END VIEW LEFT END VIEW GENERAL NOTES INSTALLATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC DATA STANDARD DETAIL STORMWATER BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM MWS-L-8-16-V PLAN VIEW ELEVATION VIEW RIGHT END VIEW LEFT END VIEW GENERAL NOTES INSTALLATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC DATA WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 30 Appendix D: BMP Maintenance Information www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Guidelines for Modular Wetland System - Linear Maintenance Summary o Remove Trash from Screening Device – average maintenance interval is 6 to 12 months.  (5 minute average service time). o Remove Sediment from Separation Chamber – average maintenance interval is 12 to 24 months.  (10 minute average service time). o Replace Cartridge Filter Media – average maintenance interval 12 to 24 months.  (10-15 minute per cartridge average service time). o Replace Drain Down Filter Media – average maintenance interval is 12 to 24 months.  (5 minute average service time). o Trim Vegetation – average maintenance interval is 6 to 12 months.  (Service time varies). System Diagram Access to screening device, separation chamber and cartridge filter Access to drain down filter Pre-Treatment Chamber Biofiltration Chamber Discharge Chamber Outflow Pipe Inflow Pipe (optional) www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Procedures Screening Device 1. Remove grate or manhole cover to gain access to the screening device in the Pre-Treatment Chamber. Vault type units do not have screening device. Maintenance can be performed without entry. 2. Remove all pollutants collected by the screening device. Removal can be done manually or with the use of a vacuum truck. The hose of the vacuum truck will not damage the screening device. 3. Screening device can easily be removed from the Pre-Treatment Chamber to gain access to separation chamber and media filters below. Replace grate or manhole cover when completed. Separation Chamber 1. Perform maintenance procedures of screening device listed above before maintaining the separation chamber. 2. With a pressure washer spray down pollutants accumulated on walls and cartridge filters. 3. Vacuum out Separation Chamber and remove all accumulated pollutants. Replace screening device, grate or manhole cover when completed. Cartridge Filters 1. Perform maintenance procedures on screening device and separation chamber before maintaining cartridge filters. 2. Enter separation chamber. 3. Unscrew the two bolts holding the lid on each cartridge filter and remove lid. 4. Remove each of 4 to 8 media cages holding the media in place. 5. Spray down the cartridge filter to remove any accumulated pollutants. 6. Vacuum out old media and accumulated pollutants. 7. Reinstall media cages and fill with new media from manufacturer or outside supplier. Manufacturer will provide specification of media and sources to purchase. 8. Replace the lid and tighten down bolts. Replace screening device, grate or manhole cover when completed. Drain Down Filter 1. Remove hatch or manhole cover over discharge chamber and enter chamber. 2. Unlock and lift drain down filter housing and remove old media block. Replace with new media block. Lower drain down filter housing and lock into place. 3. Exit chamber and replace hatch or manhole cover. www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Notes 1. Following maintenance and/or inspection, it is recommended the maintenance operator prepare a maintenance/inspection record. The record should include any maintenance activities performed, amount and description of debris collected, and condition of the system and its various filter mechanisms. 2. The owner should keep maintenance/inspection record(s) for a minimum of five years from the date of maintenance. These records should be made available to the governing municipality for inspection upon request at any time. 3. Transport all debris, trash, organics and sediments to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. 4. Entry into chambers may require confined space training based on state and local regulations. 5. No fertilizer shall be used in the Biofiltration Chamber. 6. Irrigation should be provided as recommended by manufacturer and/or landscape architect. Amount of irrigation required is dependent on plant species. Some plants may require irrigation. www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Procedure Illustration Screening Device The screening device is located directly under the manhole or grate over the Pre-Treatment Chamber. It’s mounted directly underneath for easy access and cleaning. Device can be cleaned by hand or with a vacuum truck. Separation Chamber The separation chamber is located directly beneath the screening device. It can be quickly cleaned using a vacuum truck or by hand. A pressure washer is useful to assist in the cleaning process. www.modularwetlands.com Cartridge Filters The cartridge filters are located in the Pre-Treatment chamber connected to the wall adjacent to the biofiltration chamber. The cartridges have removable tops to access the individual media filters. Once the cartridge is open media can be easily removed and replaced by hand or a vacuum truck. Drain Down Filter The drain down filter is located in the Discharge Chamber. The drain filter unlocks from the wall mount and hinges up. Remove filter block and replace with new block. www.modularwetlands.com Trim Vegetation Vegetation should be maintained in the same manner as surrounding vegetation and trimmed as needed. No fertilizer shall be used on the plants. Irrigation per the recommendation of the manufacturer and or landscape architect. Different types of vegetation requires different amounts of irrigation. www.modularwetlands.com Inspection Form Modular Wetland System, Inc. P. 760.433-7640 F. 760-433-3176 E. Info@modularwetlands.com For Office Use Only (city) (Zip Code)(Reviewed By) Owner / Management Company (Date) Contact Phone ( )_ Inspector Name Date / / Time AM / PM Weather Condition Additional Notes Yes Depth: Yes No Modular Wetland System Type (Curb, Grate or UG Vault):Size (22', 14' or etc.): Other Inspection Items: Storm Event in Last 72-hours? No Yes Type of Inspection Routine Follow Up Complaint Storm Office personnel to complete section to the left. 2972 San Luis Rey Road, Oceanside, CA 92058 P (760) 433-7640 F (760) 433-3176 Inspection Report Modular Wetlands System Is the filter insert (if applicable) at capacity and/or is there an accumulation of debris/trash on the shelf system? Does the cartridge filter media need replacement in pre-treatment chamber and/or discharge chamber? Any signs of improper functioning in the discharge chamber? Note issues in comments section. Chamber: Is the inlet/outlet pipe or drain down pipe damaged or otherwise not functioning properly? Structural Integrity: Working Condition: Is there evidence of illicit discharge or excessive oil, grease, or other automobile fluids entering and clogging theunit? Is there standing water in inappropriate areas after a dry period? Damage to pre-treatment access cover (manhole cover/grate) or cannot be opened using normal lifting pressure?Damage to discharge chamber access cover (manhole cover/grate) or cannot be opened using normal lifting pressure? Does the MWS unit show signs of structural deterioration (cracks in the wall, damage to frame)? Project Name Project Address Inspection Checklist CommentsNo Does the depth of sediment/trash/debris suggest a blockage of the inflow pipe, bypass or cartridge filter? If yes, specify which one in the comments section. Note depth of accumulation in in pre-treatment chamber. Is there a septic or foul odor coming from inside the system? Is there an accumulation of sediment/trash/debris in the wetland media (if applicable)? Is it evident that the plants are alive and healthy (if applicable)? Please note Plant Information below. Sediment / Silt / Clay Trash / Bags / Bottles Green Waste / Leaves / Foliage Waste:Plant Information No Cleaning Needed Recommended Maintenance Additional Notes: Damage to Plants Plant Replacement Plant Trimming Schedule Maintenance as Planned Needs Immediate Maintenance www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Report Modular Wetland System, Inc. P. 760.433-7640 F. 760-433-3176 E. Info@modularwetlands.com For Office Use Only (city) (Zip Code)(Reviewed By) Owner / Management Company (Date) Contact Phone ( )_ Inspector Name Date / / Time AM / PM Weather Condition Additional Notes Site Map # Comments: 2972 San Luis Rey Road, Oceanside, CA 92058 P. 760.433.7640 F. 760.433.3176 Inlet and Outlet Pipe Condition Drain Down Pipe Condition Discharge Chamber Condition Drain Down Media Condition Plant Condition Media Filter Condition Long:MWS Sedimentation Basin Total Debris Accumulation Condition of Media 25/50/75/100 (will be changed @ 75%) Operational Per Manufactures' Specifications (If not, why?) Lat:MWS Catch Basins GPS Coordinates of Insert Manufacturer / Description / Sizing Trash Accumulation Foliage Accumulation Sediment Accumulation Type of Inspection Routine Follow Up Complaint Storm Storm Event in Last 72-hours? No Yes Office personnel to complete section to the left. Project Address Project Name Cleaning and Maintenance Report Modular Wetlands System WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 31 Appendix E: Geotechnical Information (Storm water infiltration BMP evaluation) 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 October 22, 2019 Project No. 181055.1 Mr. David Cohen Cohen Living Trust 4922 E. Somerton Avenue Orange, CA 92867 Subject: Feasibility of Site Infiltration Proposed North Orange Olive Development Northeast Corner of N. Orange Olive Road & E. Grove Avenue Orange, California Reference: Twining, Inc., 2019, “Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report,” Proposed North Orange Olive Development, Northeast Corner of N. Orange Olive Road & E. Grove Avenue, Orange, California, Twining Consulting Project No. 181055.1, dated January 7. Dear Mr. Cohen, Twining, Inc. (Twining) has performed a geotechnical engineering evaluation for the development of the subject project. Geotechnical recommendations for the project were provided for the design and construction of the project and are presented in the referenced report. The results of our geotechnical engineering evaluation indicate that stormwater infiltration at the site is infeasible. A field exploration was performed at the site consisting of 5 soil borings advanced to depths up to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs), and 3 percolation test borings advanced to depths of 5, 5, and 25 feet bgs. In general, the 5 borings exposed a soil profile consisting of low permeability silt and clay with gravel in the upper 10 feet of excavations, and very dense sand and silt with gravel from 10 feet to the bottom of excavations at 51.5 feet. Our boring logs and a boring location map are attached to the end of this letter. Percolation testing was performed according to the County of Orange Technical Guidance Document for the evaluation of feasibility of site stormwater infiltration. Percolation tests P-1 and P-2 were performed at a depth of 5 feet bgs. Results of testing indicate that the highest infiltration rate for the soil layer at 5 feet is 0.05 inches per hour. Percolation test P-3 was performed at a depth of 25 feet bgs. Results of testing indicate that the infiltration rate for the soil layer at 25 feet is 0.04 inches per hour. The test data for the percolation tests is attached to the end of this letter. The design infiltration rates were evaluated using a factor of safety of 2.5, considering the variability of the site soil profile, soil type, amount of testing performed relative to the project site, and the depth to groundwater. Please refer to the attached Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate Worksheet for calculation of the factor of safety used in our analyses. The infiltration rates determined at P-1 and P-2 are consistent with the soil encountered in the upper 10 feet. The silt and clay layer encountered has a very low infiltration rate and is not appropriate for infiltration of stormwater at the site. It is our opinion that the infiltration rate determined for P-3 is also consistent with the materials conditions observed in our borings at 25 feet bgs. Based on the blow counts for the material at depths greater than 10 feet in boring P-3 (and all other borings), the soils are very dense. The measured infiltration rate at P -3 is therefore consistent with the soil conditions. 18011 Sky Park Circle Suite J Irvine CA 92614 Tel 949.553.0370 Fax 949.553.0371 Based on the results of percolation testing at the site and our data collected of the of the subgrade soils, we recommend that the site is infeasible for stormwater infiltration. In lieu of infiltration facilities to manage stormwater, we recommend “filtration” facilities, such as bio-planters and/or bioswales with liner, be used for the on-site storm water treatment prior to discharge to public storm drains. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, TWINING CONSULTING, INC. Paul Soltis, GE 2606 Vice President, Geotechnical Engineering FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP REFERENCE: USGS (2018) SCALE IN MILES REPORT DATE January 2019 PROJECT NO. 181055.1 North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, California SITE 00 0.5 1 FIGURE 2REPORT DATEJanuary 2019PROJECT NO.181055.1SITE PLAN AND BORING LOCATION MAPNOTE: All dimensions, locations, and directions are approximate.0 40 80SCALE IN FEETNorth Orange Olive DevelopmentNE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove AveOrange, CaliforniaREFERENCE: GRAPEVINE DEVELOPMENT (2018)LEGENDHOLLOW-STEM BORINGLOCATION AND DEPTHPERCOLATION TESTLOCATION AND DEPTHB-1TD = 25'P-1TD = 5' P-2TD =5' B-2TD =26.5' B-3TD =51.5' P-1TD =5' B-1TD =25' B-4TD =51.5' B-5TD =26.5' B-6(P-3)TD =26.5' 65 - 85 Loose ConsistencyRelative Density (%) Hard >30 15 - 30Very Stiff85 - 100 ATTCCORRDSEIGSKMAX ORVSESGTXUC Stiff Atterberg LimitsConsolidationCorrosivity SeriesDirect ShearExpansion IndexGrain Size DistributionPermeabilityMoisture/Density(Modified Proctor)Organic ContentResistance ValueSand EquivalentSpecific GravityTriaxial CompressionUnconfined Compression 30 - 50 4 - 8Medium Stiff 2 - 4Soft15 - 35 Sample Type Description 8 - 15 PROJECT NO.181055.1 SPT (blows/ft) Relative Density FIGURE A-1 LABORATORY TESTING ABBREVIATIONS COARSE-GRAINED SOILS 1.4 in I.D., 2.0 in. O.D. driven sampler 2.4 in. I.D., 3.0 in. O.D. driven sampler Retrieved from soil cuttings Pitcher or Shelby Tube SPT California Modified Bulk Thin-Walled Tube NOTE: SPT blow counts based on 140 lb. hammer falling 30 inches Medium Dense EXPLANATION FOR LOG OF BORINGS North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange,California REPORT DATE January 2018 0 - 15 FINE-GRAINED SOILS Very Loose SPT (blows/ft) Dense >50 35 - 6510 - 30 4 - 10 Very Soft<4 Very Dense Sample Symbol <2 GRAPH (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY,GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEANCLAYS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOWPLASTICITY POORLY-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLEOR NO FINES TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS MORE THAN 50% OFCOARSE FRACTIONPASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE SYMBOLS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS ORDIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCKFLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEYSILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLEOR NO FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAYMIXTURES SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURES MAJOR DIVISIONS SILTS AND CLAYS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGHPLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGHORGANIC CONTENTS POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SANDMIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SANDMIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES FINE GRAINED SOILS LIQUID LIMITGREATER THAN50 MORE THAN 50% OFCOARSE FRACTIONRETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE SILTS AND CLAYS MORE THAN 50% OFMATERIAL IS LARGER THANNO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SANDS WITH FINES SAND AND SANDY SOILS CLEAN SANDS CLEAN GRAVELSGRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OFMATERIAL IS SMALLERTHAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE (LITTLE OR NO FINES) (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OFFINES) LIQUID LIMITLESS THAN50 LETTER STANDARD LOG EXPLANATION 180138.1 - SUNFLOWER APARTMENTS.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 4/6/18 117.2 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, medium dense, dark brown, moist very dense same same Auger refusal @25' Total Depth = 25.0 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt GP SM Consol18 50/2" 50/4" 50/3" 9.6 3.7ELEVATION (feet)186 181 176 171 166 161 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)191 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 5 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-1 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 126.5 111.4 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY,stiff, reddish brown, moist SILTY SAND with some gravel, dense, dark brown to gray, moist very dense Poorly graded SAND with SILT and GRAVEL, very dense,brown to dark gray, moist No recover Total Depth = 26.5 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt ML SM SP-SM DS Consol 29 37 50/3" 45 50/5" 13.0 6.8 3.0ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 3 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-2 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 113.2 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY and GRAVEL,hard, brown, moist SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, gray to light brown, moist No sample same same same GP ML SM Compaction, Remold DS(90%), EI 50/3" 67 50/3" 50/4" 50/2" 11.3 2.9 3.2 4.1 3.8ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 4 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-3 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, gray to light brown, moist (continued) same same same same same Total Depth = 51.5 feet Backfilled on 12/3/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt SM50/2" 50/4" 50/2" 50/3" 50/5"ELEVATION (feet)155 150 145 140 135 130 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)35 40 45 50 55 60 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 4 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-3 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CALY and GRAVEL,medium stiff,dark brown, moist SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, medium brown, moist same No recovery ML SMConsol 8 66 66 50/3" 50/2" 3.0 3.7ELEVATION (feet)186 181 176 171 166 161 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)191 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 2 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-4 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, medium brown, moist (continued) dark brown light brown to gray No recovery No recovery No recovery Total Depth = 51.5 feet Backfilled on 12/3/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt SM50/3" 50/4" 50/3" 50/2" 50/4" 3.5ELEVATION (feet)156 151 146 141 136 131 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)191 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)35 40 45 50 55 60 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 2 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-4 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 12/3/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 121.2 111.8 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY, stiff, reddish brown, moist with gravel same SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, dark gray, moist Total Depth = 26.5 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt GP ML SM DS15 15 50/3" 50/5" 50/3" 12.7 14.4 2.7ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 6 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-5 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 119.9 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY , hard, reddish brown, moist same SANDY lean CLAY, medium stiff, reddishbrown, moist SILTY SAND with GRAVEL, very dense, redish brown, moist Poorly-graded SAND with SILT and GRAVEL, dark gray, moist Total Depth = 26.5 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt GP ML CL SM SP-SM Corrosivity, RV Wash #200, ATT 13 7 50/2" 86 50/4" 13.3 13.3 2.3ELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONADDITIONALTESTSBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 7 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.B-6 (P-3)MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CALY and GRAVEL,medium stiff,dark brown, moist Total Depth = 5.0 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt MLELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 8 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.P-1 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 4.5" Asphalt 3" Base SANDY SILT with CLAY and GRAVEL,medium stiff,dark brown, moist Total Depth = 5.0 feet Backfilled on 11/26/2018 Groundwater was not encountered Borehole backfilled at the completion of testing with cuttings. Surface patched with cold patch asphalt MLELEVATION (feet)185 180 175 170 165 160 GRAPHIC LOGSAMPLESPROJECT NO. 181055.1 LOGGED BY SZ SURFACE ELEVATION (ft.)190 +(MSL) North Orange Olive Development NE Corner of N Orange Olive Rd & E Grove Ave Orange, CaliforniaDRY DENSITY(pcf)DESCRIPTION DrivenBulkDEPTH (feet)5 10 15 20 25 30 LOG OF BORING REPORT DATE January 2019 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (ft.)NE U.S.C.S.CLASSIFICATIONBLOWS / FOOTFIGURE A - 9 DRIVE WEIGHT 140 lbs. DRILLING METHOD HSA DRILLER Baja Exploration DROP 30 inches BORING NO.P-2 MOISTURE (%)DATE DRILLED 11/26/2018 BORING LOG NORTH ORANGE OLIVE DEVELOPMENT.GPJ TWINING LABS.GDT 1/7/19 PERCOLATION TEST DATA Project No.:181055.1 Project Name:N. Orange Olive Development Test Date:November 27, 2018 Test Boring No.:P-1 Diameter of Boring (D):0.67 feet Depth of Boring (db):5.0 feet Test Performer:SZ Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial depth to water Greater than or Equal to 6"? T i T f DT d1 d2 d1 (Yes/No)(min)(feet)(feet)(inch)9:00:00 AM 9:25:00 AM 25.00 0.29 0.38 1.00 No9:35:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 25.00 0.25 0.33 1.00 No Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial height of water column Final height of water column Drop of water column Tested Infiltration Rate Infiltration Rate w/ Factor of Safety of 2.5T i T f DT d1 d2 di df Dd = di - df I t It/2.5 (min)(feet)(feet)(feet)(feet)(inch)(inch/hr)(inch/hr) Percolation Test9:12:00 AM 9:42:00 AM 30.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.009:45:00 AM 10:15:00 AM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.0010:25:00 AM 10:55:00 AM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.0011:00:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.0011:45:00 AM 12:15:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.0012:20:00 PM 12:50:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.001:00:00 PM 1:30:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.001:30:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 30.00 2.10 2.10 2.90 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (inch/hr) Infiltration Rate Calculations *Infiltration Rate: Reference: County of Orange Technical Guidance Document, dated December 20, 2013 *Based on the last dropped obtained in the final 30 minutes Sandy Soil Criteria TestTime of Testing (November 26, 2018)Water Level Measurements Time of Testing Water Level Measurements Water Level Calculations D db dG PERCOLATION TEST DATA Project No.:181055.1 Project Name:N. Orange Olive Development Test Date:November 27, 2018 Test Boring No.:P-2 Diameter of Boring (D):0.67 feet Depth of Boring (db):5.0 feet Test Performer:SZ Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial depth to water Greater than or Equal to 6"? T i T f DT d1 d2 d1 (Yes/No)(min)(feet)(feet)(inch)9:53:00 AM 10:18:00 AM 25.00 1.70 2.00 3.60 No10:20:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 25.00 1.60 1.90 3.60 No Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial height of water column Final height of water column Drop of water column Tested Infiltration Rate Infiltration Rate w/ Factor of Safety of 2.5T i T f DT d1 d2 di df Dd = di - df I t It/2.5 (min)(feet)(feet)(feet)(feet)(inch)(inch/hr)(inch/hr) Percolation Test9:15:00 AM 9:45:00 AM 30.00 3.10 3.20 1.90 1.80 1.20 0.20 0.089:50:00 AM 10:20:00 AM 30.00 3.00 3.10 2.00 1.90 1.20 0.19 0.0810:25:00 AM 10:55:00 AM 30.00 2.90 3.00 2.10 2.00 1.20 0.18 0.0711:00:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 30.00 2.70 2.80 2.30 2.20 1.20 0.17 0.0711:35:00 AM 12:05:00 PM 30.00 2.50 2.60 2.50 2.40 1.20 0.15 0.0612:10:00 PM 12:40:00 PM 30.00 2.20 2.30 2.80 2.70 1.20 0.14 0.0512:50:00 PM 1:20:00 PM 30.00 2.20 2.30 2.80 2.70 1.20 0.14 0.051:25:00 PM 1:55:00 PM 30.00 2.20 2.30 2.80 2.70 1.20 0.14 0.05 0.05 (inch/hr) Infiltration Rate Calculations *Infiltration Rate: Reference: County of Orange Technical Guidance Document, dated December 20, 2013 *Based on the last dropped obtained in the final 30 minutes Sandy Soil Criteria TestTime of Testing (November 26, 2018)Water Level Measurements Time of Testing Water Level Measurements Water Level Calculations D db dG PERCOLATION TEST DATA Project No.:181055.1 Project Name:N. Orange Olive Development Test Date:November 27, 2018 Test Boring No.:P-3 Diameter of Boring (D):0.67 feet Depth of Boring (db):25.0 feet Test Performer:SZ Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial depth to water Greater than or Equal to 6"? T i T f DT d1 d2 d1 (Yes/No)(min)(feet)(feet)(inch)2:12:00 PM 2:37:00 PM 25.00 14.75 15.02 3.24 No2:45:00 PM 3:10:00 PM 25.00 14.00 14.27 3.24 No Start Time Stop Time Time Interval Initial depth to water Final depth to water Initial height of water column Final height of water column Drop of water column Tested Infiltration Rate Infiltration Rate w/ Factor of Safety of 2.5T i T f DT d1 d2 di df Dd = di - df I t It/2.5 (min)(feet)(feet)(feet)(feet)(inch)(inch/hr)(inch/hr) Percolation Test9:15:00 AM 9:45:00 AM 30.00 13.90 14.40 11.10 10.60 6.00 0.18 0.0710:00:00 AM 10:30:00 AM 30.00 6.40 6.90 18.60 18.10 6.00 0.11 0.0410:35:00 AM 11:05:00 AM 30.00 5.50 6.00 19.50 19.00 6.00 0.10 0.0411:10:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 30.00 4.90 5.40 20.10 19.60 6.00 0.10 0.0411:45:00 AM 12:15:00 PM 30.00 4.30 4.80 20.70 20.20 6.00 0.10 0.0412:25:00 PM 12:55:00 PM 30.00 3.60 4.10 21.40 20.90 6.00 0.09 0.041:00:00 PM 1:30:00 PM 30.00 3.60 4.10 21.40 20.90 6.00 0.09 0.041:35:00 PM 2:05:00 PM 30.00 3.50 4.00 21.50 21.00 6.00 0.09 0.04 0.04 (inch/hr) Infiltration Rate Calculations *Infiltration Rate: Reference: County of Orange Technical Guidance Document, dated December 20, 2013 *Based on the last dropped obtained in the final 30 minutes Sandy Soil Criteria TestTime of Testing (November 26, 2018)Water Level Measurements Time of Testing Water Level Measurements Water Level Calculations D db dG WQMP for Cohen Property WQMP Prepared 11/20/19 32 Appendix F: Hydrology Information (Q2 – Two-year frequency storm evaluation) ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2015 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 22.0 Release Date: 07/01/2015 License ID 1510 Analysis prepared by: DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 South Old Springs Road, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 714-685-6860 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * 18-860 Orange Residential * * Existing Hydrology Study * * 2 Year Storm Event * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: 8860EX02.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 11:09 01/31/2019 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 12.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.01 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 201.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 205.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 200.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 198.70 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.390 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.966 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL D 0.33 0.20 0.100 57 6.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.58 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.33 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.58 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 201.00 TO NODE 211.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 198.70 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 198.30 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 95.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 2.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.200 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.802 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL D 0.01 0.20 0.100 57 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 0.59 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.51 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.25 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 6.13 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.05 Tc(MIN.) = 7.44 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.01 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.02 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.58 NOTE: PEAK FLOW RATE DEFAULTED TO UPSTREAM VALUE END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.25 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 6.02 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.52 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.38 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 211.00 = 300.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 211.00 TO NODE 211.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.44 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.80 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 0.58 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 210.00 TO NODE 211.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 205.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 200.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 198.30 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.171 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.006 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL D 0.27 0.20 0.100 57 6.17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.48 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.27 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.48 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 211.00 TO NODE 211.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.17 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.01 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.27 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.27 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 0.48 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.58 7.44 1.802 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.3 200.00 2 0.48 6.17 2.006 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.3 210.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.02 6.17 2.006 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.6 210.00 2 1.01 7.44 1.802 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.6 200.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.02 Tc(MIN.) = 6.17 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.55 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.6 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 211.00 = 300.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 211.00 TO NODE 221.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 198.30 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 198.20 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 35.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 2.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.200 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.922 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL D 0.01 0.20 0.100 57 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.03 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.22 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.30 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 11.35 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.48 Tc(MIN.) = 6.65 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.01 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.02 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.56 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.02 NOTE: PEAK FLOW RATE DEFAULTED TO UPSTREAM VALUE END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.30 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 11.23 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.22 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.37 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 221.00 = 335.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 221.00 TO NODE 221.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.65 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.56 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.62 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.02 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 220.00 TO NODE 221.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 225.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 200.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 198.20 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.474 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.952 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL D 0.46 0.20 0.100 57 6.47 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.80 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.46 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.80 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 221.00 TO NODE 221.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.47 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.95 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.46 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.46 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 0.80 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.02 6.65 1.922 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.6 210.00 1 1.01 7.91 1.739 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.6 200.00 2 0.80 6.47 1.952 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.5 220.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.81 6.47 1.952 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.0 220.00 2 1.80 6.65 1.922 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.0 210.00 3 1.72 7.91 1.739 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.1 200.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.81 Tc(MIN.) = 6.47 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.01 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.1 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 221.00 = 335.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 221.00 TO NODE 231.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 198.20 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 197.60 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 165.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 2.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.200 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.681 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL D 0.01 0.20 0.100 57 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.81 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.43 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.34 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 14.63 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.93 Tc(MIN.) = 8.40 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.01 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.01 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.81 NOTE: PEAK FLOW RATE DEFAULTED TO UPSTREAM VALUE END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.34 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 14.63 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.42 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.48 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 231.00 = 500.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 231.00 TO NODE 231.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.40 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.68 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.02 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.09 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.81 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 230.00 TO NODE 231.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 215.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 200.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 197.60 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.044 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.030 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL D 0.39 0.20 0.100 57 6.04 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.71 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.39 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.71 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 231.00 TO NODE 231.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.04 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.39 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.39 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 0.71 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.81 8.40 1.681 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.0 220.00 1 1.80 8.58 1.661 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.0 210.00 1 1.72 9.86 1.533 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.1 200.00 2 0.71 6.04 2.030 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.4 230.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 2.28 6.04 2.030 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.1 230.00 2 2.39 8.40 1.681 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.4 220.00 3 2.38 8.58 1.661 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.4 210.00 4 2.25 9.86 1.533 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.5 200.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.39 Tc(MIN.) = 8.40 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.41 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 231.00 = 500.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 231.00 TO NODE 241.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 197.60 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 197.50 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 35.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 2.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.200 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.632 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL D 0.01 0.20 0.100 57 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.40 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.33 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.37 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 17.92 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.44 Tc(MIN.) = 8.84 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.01 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.01 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.42 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.39 NOTE: PEAK FLOW RATE DEFAULTED TO UPSTREAM VALUE END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.37 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 17.80 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.34 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.49 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 241.00 = 535.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 241.00 TO NODE 241.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.84 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.63 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.42 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.49 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.39 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 240.00 TO NODE 241.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 255.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 199.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 197.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.598 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.780 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL D 0.61 0.20 0.100 57 7.60 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.97 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.97 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 241.00 TO NODE 241.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.60 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.78 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 0.97 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 2.28 6.48 1.950 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.1 230.00 1 2.39 8.84 1.632 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.4 220.00 1 2.38 9.01 1.614 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.4 210.00 1 2.25 10.30 1.495 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.5 200.00 2 0.97 7.60 1.780 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.6 240.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.18 6.48 1.950 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.7 230.00 2 3.30 7.60 1.780 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.9 240.00 3 3.27 8.84 1.632 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.0 220.00 4 3.26 9.01 1.614 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.0 210.00 5 3.06 10.30 1.495 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.1 200.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.30 Tc(MIN.) = 7.60 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.88 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.1 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 241.00 = 535.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 241.00 TO NODE 242.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 197.50 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 197.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 120.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 2.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.200 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.635 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL D 0.01 0.20 0.100 57 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.30 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.64 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.38 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 19.05 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.22 Tc(MIN.) = 8.82 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.01 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.01 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.89 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.30 NOTE: PEAK FLOW RATE DEFAULTED TO UPSTREAM VALUE END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.38 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 19.05 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.64 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.62 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 242.00 = 655.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 242.00 TO NODE 242.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.82 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.63 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.89 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.30 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 301.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 430.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 200.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 198.30 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 10.063 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.515 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL D 0.85 0.20 0.100 57 10.06 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.14 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.85 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.14 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 301.00 TO NODE 242.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 198.30 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 197.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 330.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 2.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.200 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.258 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL D 0.01 0.20 0.100 57 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.15 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.43 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.30 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 11.01 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.86 Tc(MIN.) = 13.92 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.01 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.01 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.86 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.14 NOTE: PEAK FLOW RATE DEFAULTED TO UPSTREAM VALUE END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.30 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 10.89 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.44 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.43 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 242.00 = 760.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 242.00 TO NODE 242.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 13.92 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.26 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.86 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.86 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.14 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.18 7.71 1.766 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.7 230.00 1 3.30 8.82 1.635 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 1.9 240.00 1 3.27 10.06 1.516 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.0 220.00 1 3.26 10.24 1.500 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.1 210.00 1 3.06 11.52 1.402 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.1 200.00 2 1.14 13.92 1.258 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 0.9 300.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 4.08 7.71 1.766 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.1 230.00 2 4.24 8.82 1.635 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.4 240.00 3 4.27 10.06 1.516 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.7 220.00 4 4.26 10.24 1.500 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.7 210.00 5 4.12 11.52 1.402 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.8 200.00 6 3.89 13.92 1.258 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 3.0 300.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.27 Tc(MIN.) = 10.06 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.66 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.0 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 242.00 = 760.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 242.00 TO NODE 243.00 IS CODE = 41 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 195.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 194.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 20.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 ASSUME FULL-FLOWING PIPELINE PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.09 (PIPE FLOW VELOCITY CORRESPONDING TO NORMAL-DEPTH FLOW AT DEPTH = 0.82 * DIAMETER) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 4.27 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.31 Tc(MIN.) = 10.36 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 243.00 = 780.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.0 TC(MIN.) = 10.36 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.66 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.02 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.27 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 4.08 8.01 1.727 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.1 230.00 2 4.24 9.12 1.603 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.4 240.00 3 4.27 10.36 1.490 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.7 220.00 4 4.26 10.54 1.475 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.7 210.00 5 4.12 11.83 1.381 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 2.8 200.00 6 3.89 14.22 1.242 0.20( 0.02) 0.10 3.0 300.00 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2015 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 22.0 Release Date: 07/01/2015 License ID 1510 Analysis prepared by: DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 South Old Springs Road, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 714-685-6860 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * 18-860 Orange Residential * * Proposed Hydrology Study * * 2 Year Storm Event * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: 8860PR02.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 13:27 01/31/2019 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 12.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 155.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 201.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 200.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.338 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.976 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL "11+ DWELLINGS/ACRE" D 1.83 0.20 0.200 57 6.34 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.83 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.19 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 112.00 IS CODE = 41 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 197.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 194.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 605.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 ASSUME FULL-FLOWING PIPELINE PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.71 (PIPE FLOW VELOCITY CORRESPONDING TO FULL PIPE CAPACITY FLOW) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 12.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 3.19 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.72 Tc(MIN.) = 10.06 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 112.00 = 760.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 112.00 TO NODE 112.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.06 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.52 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.83 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.83 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.19 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 110.00 TO NODE 111.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 160.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 200.90 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 199.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.365 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.971 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL "11+ DWELLINGS/ACRE" D 1.08 0.20 0.200 57 6.36 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.88 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.88 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 112.00 IS CODE = 41 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 196.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 194.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 295.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 12.0 INCH PIPE IS 7.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.73 GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 12.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 1.88 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.32 Tc(MIN.) = 7.68 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 110.00 TO NODE 112.00 = 455.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 112.00 TO NODE 112.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.68 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.77 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.08 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.88 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.19 10.06 1.515 0.20( 0.04) 0.20 1.8 100.00 2 1.88 7.68 1.769 0.20( 0.04) 0.20 1.1 110.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 4.73 7.68 1.769 0.20( 0.04) 0.20 2.5 110.00 2 4.79 10.06 1.515 0.20( 0.04) 0.20 2.9 100.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.79 Tc(MIN.) = 10.06 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.91 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 112.00 = 760.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 TC(MIN.) = 10.06 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.91 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.200 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.79 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 4.73 7.68 1.769 0.20( 0.04) 0.20 2.5 110.00 2 4.79 10.06 1.515 0.20( 0.04) 0.20 2.9 100.00 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2015 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 22.0 Release Date: 07/01/2015 License ID 1510 Analysis prepared by: DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 South Old Springs Road, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 714-685-6860 **************************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem Descriptions: 18-860 Cohen Property 2 Year Existing 10/24/19 ============================================================================ *** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS FOR AMC I: TOTAL 24-HOUR DURATION RAINFALL DEPTH = 2.05 (inches) SOIL-COVER AREA PERCENT OF SCS CURVE LOSS RATE TYPE (Acres) PERVIOUS AREA NUMBER Fp(in./hr.) YIELD 1 0.17 100.00 75.(AMC II) 0.000 0.018 TOTAL AREA (Acres) = 0.17 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE, Fm (in./hr.) = 0.000 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOW LOSS FRACTION, Y = 0.982 ============================================================================ 1 ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** SMALL AREA UNIT HYDROGRAPH MODEL ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2015 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 22.0 Release Date: 07/01/2015 License ID 1510 Analysis prepared by: DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 South Old Springs Road, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 714-685-6860 **************************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem Descriptions: 18-860 Cohen Property Existing 2 year Hydrograph 10/24/19 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- RATIONAL METHOD CALIBRATION COEFFICIENT = 0.90 TOTAL CATCHMENT AREA(ACRES) = 2.91 SOIL-LOSS RATE, Fm,(INCH/HR) = 0.000 LOW LOSS FRACTION = 0.982 TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.36 SMALL AREA PEAK Q COMPUTED USING PEAK FLOW RATE FORMULA ORANGE COUNTY "VALLEY" RAINFALL VALUES ARE USED RETURN FREQUENCY(YEARS) = 2 5-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.19 30-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.40 1-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.53 3-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.89 6-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 1.22 24-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 2.05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CATCHMENT RUNOFF VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.44 TOTAL CATCHMENT SOIL-LOSS VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.05 **************************************************************************** TIME VOLUME Q 0. 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (HOURS) (AF) (CFS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.11 0.0000 0.00 Q . . . . 0.29 0.0006 0.08 Q . . . . 0.46 0.0018 0.08 Q . . . . 0.63 0.0030 0.09 Q . . . . 0.81 0.0042 0.09 Q . . . . 0.98 0.0055 0.09 Q . . . . 1.15 0.0067 0.09 Q . . . . 1.32 0.0080 0.09 Q . . . . 1.50 0.0092 0.09 Q . . . . 1.67 0.0105 0.09 Q . . . . 1.84 0.0118 0.09 Q . . . . 2.01 0.0131 0.09 Q . . . . 2.19 0.0144 0.09 Q . . . . 2.36 0.0157 0.09 Q . . . . 2.53 0.0170 0.09 Q . . . . 2.70 0.0183 0.09 Q . . . . 2.88 0.0196 0.09 Q . . . . 1 3.05 0.0210 0.10 Q . . . . 3.22 0.0224 0.10 Q . . . . 3.40 0.0237 0.10 Q . . . . 3.57 0.0251 0.10 Q . . . . 3.74 0.0265 0.10 Q . . . . 3.91 0.0279 0.10 Q . . . . 4.09 0.0293 0.10 Q . . . . 4.26 0.0308 0.10 Q . . . . 4.43 0.0322 0.10 Q . . . . 4.60 0.0337 0.10 Q . . . . 4.78 0.0351 0.10 Q . . . . 4.95 0.0366 0.10 Q . . . . 5.12 0.0381 0.11 Q . . . . 5.29 0.0396 0.11 Q . . . . 5.47 0.0412 0.11 Q . . . . 5.64 0.0427 0.11 Q . . . . 5.81 0.0443 0.11 Q . . . . 5.99 0.0459 0.11 Q . . . . 6.16 0.0475 0.11 Q . . . . 6.33 0.0491 0.11 Q . . . . 6.50 0.0507 0.12 Q . . . . 6.68 0.0524 0.12 Q . . . . 6.85 0.0540 0.12 Q . . . . 7.02 0.0557 0.12 Q . . . . 7.19 0.0574 0.12 Q . . . . 7.37 0.0592 0.12 Q . . . . 7.54 0.0609 0.12 Q . . . . 7.71 0.0627 0.12 Q . . . . 7.88 0.0645 0.13 Q . . . . 8.06 0.0663 0.13 Q . . . . 8.23 0.0681 0.13 Q . . . . 8.40 0.0700 0.13 Q . . . . 8.58 0.0719 0.13 Q . . . . 8.75 0.0738 0.14 Q . . . . 8.92 0.0758 0.14 Q . . . . 9.09 0.0778 0.14 Q . . . . 9.27 0.0798 0.14 Q . . . . 9.44 0.0818 0.14 Q . . . . 9.61 0.0839 0.15 Q . . . . 9.78 0.0860 0.15 Q . . . . 9.96 0.0881 0.15 Q . . . . 10.13 0.0903 0.15 Q . . . . 10.30 0.0926 0.16 Q . . . . 10.47 0.0948 0.16 Q . . . . 10.65 0.0971 0.16 Q . . . . 10.82 0.0995 0.17 Q . . . . 10.99 0.1019 0.17 Q . . . . 11.17 0.1043 0.17 Q . . . . 11.34 0.1069 0.18 Q . . . . 11.51 0.1094 0.18 Q . . . . 11.68 0.1120 0.19 Q . . . . 11.86 0.1147 0.19 Q . . . . 12.03 0.1175 0.20 Q . . . . 12.20 0.1206 0.23 Q . . . . 12.37 0.1240 0.25 .Q . . . . 12.55 0.1276 0.26 .Q . . . . 12.72 0.1313 0.26 .Q . . . . 12.89 0.1352 0.27 .Q . . . . 13.06 0.1391 0.28 .Q . . . . 13.24 0.1431 0.29 .Q . . . . 13.41 0.1473 0.30 .Q . . . . 13.58 0.1517 0.31 .Q . . . . 13.76 0.1562 0.32 .Q . . . . 13.93 0.1608 0.33 .Q . . . . 14.10 0.1657 0.36 .Q . . . . 2 14.27 0.1710 0.38 .Q . . . . 14.45 0.1765 0.40 .Q . . . . 14.62 0.1824 0.42 .Q . . . . 14.79 0.1887 0.46 .Q . . . . 14.96 0.1953 0.48 .Q . . . . 15.14 0.2026 0.54 . Q . . . . 15.31 0.2105 0.57 . Q . . . . 15.48 0.2188 0.60 . Q . . . . 15.65 0.2278 0.66 . Q . . . . 15.83 0.2393 0.95 . Q . . . . 16.00 0.2553 1.30 . Q . . . . 16.17 0.2925 3.90 . . Q . . . 16.35 0.3257 0.76 . Q . . . . 16.52 0.3356 0.62 . Q . . . . 16.69 0.3436 0.50 . Q . . . . 16.86 0.3503 0.44 .Q . . . . 17.04 0.3562 0.39 .Q . . . . 17.21 0.3614 0.34 .Q . . . . 17.38 0.3661 0.31 .Q . . . . 17.55 0.3704 0.29 .Q . . . . 17.73 0.3745 0.28 .Q . . . . 17.90 0.3783 0.26 .Q . . . . 18.07 0.3819 0.25 Q . . . . 18.24 0.3851 0.19 Q . . . . 18.42 0.3878 0.18 Q . . . . 18.59 0.3903 0.18 Q . . . . 18.76 0.3928 0.17 Q . . . . 18.94 0.3951 0.16 Q . . . . 19.11 0.3974 0.16 Q . . . . 19.28 0.3996 0.15 Q . . . . 19.45 0.4017 0.15 Q . . . . 19.63 0.4037 0.14 Q . . . . 19.80 0.4057 0.14 Q . . . . 19.97 0.4076 0.13 Q . . . . 20.14 0.4095 0.13 Q . . . . 20.32 0.4113 0.13 Q . . . . 20.49 0.4131 0.12 Q . . . . 20.66 0.4148 0.12 Q . . . . 20.83 0.4165 0.12 Q . . . . 21.01 0.4182 0.11 Q . . . . 21.18 0.4198 0.11 Q . . . . 21.35 0.4214 0.11 Q . . . . 21.53 0.4229 0.11 Q . . . . 21.70 0.4244 0.11 Q . . . . 21.87 0.4259 0.10 Q . . . . 22.04 0.4274 0.10 Q . . . . 22.22 0.4288 0.10 Q . . . . 22.39 0.4302 0.10 Q . . . . 22.56 0.4316 0.10 Q . . . . 22.73 0.4330 0.09 Q . . . . 22.91 0.4343 0.09 Q . . . . 23.08 0.4356 0.09 Q . . . . 23.25 0.4369 0.09 Q . . . . 23.42 0.4382 0.09 Q . . . . 23.60 0.4395 0.09 Q . . . . 23.77 0.4407 0.09 Q . . . . 23.94 0.4419 0.09 Q . . . . 24.12 0.4431 0.08 Q . . . . 24.29 0.4437 0.00 Q . . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME DURATION(minutes) OF PERCENTILES OF ESTIMATED PEAK FLOW RATE: (Note: 100% of Peak Flow Rate estimate assumed to have an instantaneous time duration) 3 Percentile of Estimated Duration Peak Flow Rate (minutes) ======================= ========= 0% 1440.0 10% 155.4 20% 31.1 30% 20.7 40% 10.4 50% 10.4 60% 10.4 70% 10.4 80% 10.4 90% 10.4 4 ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2015 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 22.0 Release Date: 07/01/2015 License ID 1510 Analysis prepared by: DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 South Old Springs Road, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 714-685-6860 **************************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem Descriptions: 18-860 Cohen Property Proposed 2 year 10/24/19 ============================================================================ *** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS FOR AMC I: TOTAL 24-HOUR DURATION RAINFALL DEPTH = 2.05 (inches) SOIL-COVER AREA PERCENT OF SCS CURVE LOSS RATE TYPE (Acres) PERVIOUS AREA NUMBER Fp(in./hr.) YIELD 1 0.50 100.00 75.(AMC II) 0.000 0.018 TOTAL AREA (Acres) = 0.50 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE, Fm (in./hr.) = 0.000 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOW LOSS FRACTION, Y = 0.982 ============================================================================ 1 ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** SMALL AREA UNIT HYDROGRAPH MODEL ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2015 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 22.0 Release Date: 07/01/2015 License ID 1510 Analysis prepared by: DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 South Old Springs Road, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 714-685-6860 **************************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem Descriptions: 18-860 Cohen Property Proposed 2 year Hydrograph 10/24/19 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- RATIONAL METHOD CALIBRATION COEFFICIENT = 0.90 TOTAL CATCHMENT AREA(ACRES) = 2.91 SOIL-LOSS RATE, Fm,(INCH/HR) = 0.000 LOW LOSS FRACTION = 0.982 TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.06 SMALL AREA PEAK Q COMPUTED USING PEAK FLOW RATE FORMULA ORANGE COUNTY "VALLEY" RAINFALL VALUES ARE USED RETURN FREQUENCY(YEARS) = 2 5-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.19 30-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.40 1-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.53 3-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.89 6-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 1.22 24-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 2.05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CATCHMENT RUNOFF VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.44 TOTAL CATCHMENT SOIL-LOSS VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.05 **************************************************************************** TIME VOLUME Q 0. 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (HOURS) (AF) (CFS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.07 0.0002 0.08 Q . . . . 0.24 0.0014 0.08 Q . . . . 0.41 0.0026 0.08 Q . . . . 0.57 0.0038 0.09 Q . . . . 0.74 0.0049 0.09 Q . . . . 0.91 0.0061 0.09 Q . . . . 1.08 0.0073 0.09 Q . . . . 1.25 0.0085 0.09 Q . . . . 1.41 0.0098 0.09 Q . . . . 1.58 0.0110 0.09 Q . . . . 1.75 0.0122 0.09 Q . . . . 1.92 0.0135 0.09 Q . . . . 2.08 0.0147 0.09 Q . . . . 2.25 0.0160 0.09 Q . . . . 2.42 0.0173 0.09 Q . . . . 2.59 0.0185 0.09 Q . . . . 2.75 0.0198 0.09 Q . . . . 1 2.92 0.0211 0.09 Q . . . . 3.09 0.0224 0.10 Q . . . . 3.26 0.0238 0.10 Q . . . . 3.42 0.0251 0.10 Q . . . . 3.59 0.0265 0.10 Q . . . . 3.76 0.0278 0.10 Q . . . . 3.93 0.0292 0.10 Q . . . . 4.10 0.0306 0.10 Q . . . . 4.26 0.0320 0.10 Q . . . . 4.43 0.0334 0.10 Q . . . . 4.60 0.0348 0.10 Q . . . . 4.77 0.0362 0.10 Q . . . . 4.93 0.0376 0.10 Q . . . . 5.10 0.0391 0.11 Q . . . . 5.27 0.0406 0.11 Q . . . . 5.44 0.0421 0.11 Q . . . . 5.60 0.0436 0.11 Q . . . . 5.77 0.0451 0.11 Q . . . . 5.94 0.0466 0.11 Q . . . . 6.11 0.0482 0.11 Q . . . . 6.28 0.0497 0.11 Q . . . . 6.44 0.0513 0.11 Q . . . . 6.61 0.0529 0.12 Q . . . . 6.78 0.0545 0.12 Q . . . . 6.95 0.0561 0.12 Q . . . . 7.11 0.0578 0.12 Q . . . . 7.28 0.0595 0.12 Q . . . . 7.45 0.0611 0.12 Q . . . . 7.62 0.0629 0.12 Q . . . . 7.78 0.0646 0.13 Q . . . . 7.95 0.0663 0.13 Q . . . . 8.12 0.0681 0.13 Q . . . . 8.29 0.0699 0.13 Q . . . . 8.45 0.0717 0.13 Q . . . . 8.62 0.0736 0.13 Q . . . . 8.79 0.0755 0.14 Q . . . . 8.96 0.0774 0.14 Q . . . . 9.13 0.0793 0.14 Q . . . . 9.29 0.0813 0.14 Q . . . . 9.46 0.0832 0.15 Q . . . . 9.63 0.0853 0.15 Q . . . . 9.80 0.0873 0.15 Q . . . . 9.96 0.0894 0.15 Q . . . . 10.13 0.0915 0.16 Q . . . . 10.30 0.0937 0.16 Q . . . . 10.47 0.0959 0.16 Q . . . . 10.63 0.0981 0.16 Q . . . . 10.80 0.1004 0.17 Q . . . . 10.97 0.1027 0.17 Q . . . . 11.14 0.1051 0.17 Q . . . . 11.31 0.1076 0.18 Q . . . . 11.47 0.1100 0.18 Q . . . . 11.64 0.1126 0.18 Q . . . . 11.81 0.1152 0.19 Q . . . . 11.98 0.1178 0.19 Q . . . . 12.14 0.1208 0.23 Q . . . . 12.31 0.1241 0.25 Q . . . . 12.48 0.1276 0.26 .Q . . . . 12.65 0.1312 0.26 .Q . . . . 12.81 0.1348 0.27 .Q . . . . 12.98 0.1386 0.27 .Q . . . . 13.15 0.1425 0.29 .Q . . . . 13.32 0.1465 0.29 .Q . . . . 13.48 0.1506 0.30 .Q . . . . 13.65 0.1549 0.31 .Q . . . . 2 13.82 0.1593 0.33 .Q . . . . 13.99 0.1639 0.34 .Q . . . . 14.16 0.1688 0.37 .Q . . . . 14.32 0.1740 0.38 .Q . . . . 14.49 0.1795 0.41 .Q . . . . 14.66 0.1853 0.43 .Q . . . . 14.83 0.1915 0.46 .Q . . . . 14.99 0.1981 0.49 .Q . . . . 15.16 0.2052 0.54 . Q . . . . 15.33 0.2130 0.58 . Q . . . . 15.50 0.2211 0.60 . Q . . . . 15.66 0.2299 0.67 . Q . . . . 15.83 0.2412 0.97 . Q . . . . 16.00 0.2571 1.32 . Q . . . . 16.17 0.2938 3.97 . . Q . . . 16.34 0.3267 0.78 . Q . . . . 16.50 0.3364 0.63 . Q . . . . 16.67 0.3443 0.51 . Q . . . . 16.84 0.3509 0.44 .Q . . . . 17.01 0.3567 0.40 .Q . . . . 17.17 0.3618 0.35 .Q . . . . 17.34 0.3665 0.32 .Q . . . . 17.51 0.3707 0.30 .Q . . . . 17.68 0.3747 0.28 .Q . . . . 17.84 0.3785 0.26 .Q . . . . 18.01 0.3821 0.25 .Q . . . . 18.18 0.3852 0.20 Q . . . . 18.35 0.3879 0.19 Q . . . . 18.52 0.3904 0.18 Q . . . . 18.68 0.3928 0.17 Q . . . . 18.85 0.3952 0.16 Q . . . . 19.02 0.3974 0.16 Q . . . . 19.19 0.3996 0.15 Q . . . . 19.35 0.4016 0.15 Q . . . . 19.52 0.4037 0.14 Q . . . . 19.69 0.4056 0.14 Q . . . . 19.86 0.4075 0.14 Q . . . . 20.02 0.4094 0.13 Q . . . . 20.19 0.4112 0.13 Q . . . . 20.36 0.4129 0.12 Q . . . . 20.53 0.4146 0.12 Q . . . . 20.69 0.4163 0.12 Q . . . . 20.86 0.4179 0.12 Q . . . . 21.03 0.4195 0.11 Q . . . . 21.20 0.4211 0.11 Q . . . . 21.37 0.4226 0.11 Q . . . . 21.53 0.4241 0.11 Q . . . . 21.70 0.4256 0.11 Q . . . . 21.87 0.4270 0.10 Q . . . . 22.04 0.4285 0.10 Q . . . . 22.20 0.4299 0.10 Q . . . . 22.37 0.4312 0.10 Q . . . . 22.54 0.4326 0.10 Q . . . . 22.71 0.4339 0.09 Q . . . . 22.87 0.4352 0.09 Q . . . . 23.04 0.4365 0.09 Q . . . . 23.21 0.4377 0.09 Q . . . . 23.38 0.4390 0.09 Q . . . . 23.55 0.4402 0.09 Q . . . . 23.71 0.4414 0.09 Q . . . . 23.88 0.4426 0.09 Q . . . . 24.05 0.4438 0.08 Q . . . . 24.22 0.4444 0.00 Q . . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 TIME DURATION(minutes) OF PERCENTILES OF ESTIMATED PEAK FLOW RATE: (Note: 100% of Peak Flow Rate estimate assumed to have an instantaneous time duration) Percentile of Estimated Duration Peak Flow Rate (minutes) ======================= ========= 0% 1448.6 10% 150.9 20% 30.2 30% 20.1 40% 10.1 50% 10.1 60% 10.1 70% 10.1 80% 10.1 90% 10.1 4 APPENDIX F NOISE MONITORING RESULTS North Boundary Measurement Record # Date Time Run Duration Run Time Pause LAeq LAE LASmin LASmin Time LASmax LASmax Time 1 2019-01-08 19:33:45 00:20:13.2 00:20:13.2 00:00:00.0 55.7 86.5 48.5 19:41:18 74.8 19:33:57 East Boundary Measurement Record # Date Time Run Duration Run Time Pause LAeq LAE LASmin LASmin Time LASmax LASmax Time LApeak (max) 1 2019-01-08 19:08:36 00:22:05.6 00:22:05.6 00:00:00.0 52.5 83.7 47.8 19:20:20 65.1 19:27:28 79.1 South Boundary Measurement Record #Date Time Run Duration Run Time Pause LAeq LAE LASmin LASmin Time LASmax LASmax Time 1 2019-01-07 18:27:18 00:32:41.6 00:32:41.6 00:00:00.0 69.8 102.7 47.1 18:27:40 94.1 18:36:27 2 2019-01-07 19:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 58.0 93.6 48.0 19:32:37 77.4 19:39:51 3 2019-01-07 20:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 55.7 91.3 48.4 20:01:52 71.7 20:55:04 4 2019-01-07 21:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 60.9 96.4 48.4 21:59:55 85.3 21:32:22 5 2019-01-07 22:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 52.8 88.4 45.8 22:41:06 69.4 22:22:42 6 2019-01-07 23:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 57.5 93.1 45.7 23:58:20 80.9 23:07:48 7 2019-01-08 00:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 50.1 85.7 42.6 00:46:14 73.7 00:12:51 8 2019-01-08 01:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 47.6 83.2 42.2 01:11:45 71.7 01:05:46 9 2019-01-08 02:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 49.0 84.6 43.9 02:05:00 61.8 02:13:09 10 2019-01-08 03:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 53.8 89.4 47.6 03:28:57 73.9 03:34:06 11 2019-01-08 04:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 55.6 91.1 48.6 04:07:20 70.0 04:56:37 12 2019-01-08 05:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 58.9 94.5 53.4 05:03:40 77.1 05:56:38 13 2019-01-08 06:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 60.0 95.6 55.2 06:29:42 78.0 06:05:08 14 2019-01-08 07:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 62.5 98.0 55.2 07:06:19 77.4 07:21:39 15 2019-01-08 08:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 63.0 98.6 53.1 08:44:03 84.6 08:50:37 16 2019-01-08 09:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 60.0 95.5 48.4 09:55:31 82.2 09:15:57 17 2019-01-08 10:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.3 94.8 47.9 10:23:58 80.1 10:34:26 18 2019-01-08 11:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 58.8 94.3 45.8 11:27:24 81.0 11:58:37 19 2019-01-08 12:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 63.6 99.2 44.4 12:22:16 90.1 12:44:57 20 2019-01-08 13:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.6 95.2 47.0 13:02:13 81.5 13:53:36 21 2019-01-08 14:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.5 95.1 46.7 14:18:20 77.2 14:26:24 22 2019-01-08 15:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 60.3 95.8 48.8 15:02:39 74.0 15:15:58 23 2019-01-08 16:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 61.3 96.9 50.4 16:57:10 81.0 16:15:18 24 2019-01-08 17:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 61.8 97.3 47.6 17:12:05 88.2 17:32:07 25 2019-01-08 18:00:00 00:57:45.9 00:57:45.9 00:00:00.0 62.2 97.6 48.3 18:19:29 89.3 18:57:24 Western Boundary Measurements Record #Time Run Duration LAeq LASmin LASmax 49 19:00:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 53.2 81.5 50 19:01:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 60.4 81.0 51 19:02:00 00:01:00.0 66.2 51.8 74.0 52 19:03:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 53.6 78.5 53 19:04:00 00:01:00.0 65.5 52.1 76.9 54 19:05:00 00:01:00.0 78.0 55.2 87.7 55 19:06:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 52.8 79.6 56 19:07:00 00:01:00.0 71.9 58.5 80.3 57 19:08:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 56.5 81.5 58 19:09:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 54.6 82.2 59 19:10:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 55.0 80.0 60 19:11:00 00:01:00.0 64.6 50.8 72.8 61 19:12:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 57.8 81.0 62 19:13:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 49.6 77.6 63 19:14:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 51.2 79.6 64 19:15:00 00:01:00.0 67.5 50.9 76.5 65 19:16:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 54.1 79.8 66 19:17:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 55.6 81.4 67 19:18:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 51.2 75.8 68 19:19:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 56.7 81.6 69 19:20:00 00:01:00.0 66.9 52.4 75.8 70 19:21:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 49.5 79.0 71 19:22:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 52.0 79.9 72 19:23:00 00:01:00.0 68.2 52.7 79.6 73 19:24:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 56.4 81.4 74 19:25:00 00:01:00.0 71.9 54.0 82.2 75 19:26:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 52.1 80.6 76 19:27:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 57.3 85.3 77 19:28:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 51.8 76.4 78 19:29:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 52.7 80.5 79 19:30:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 56.4 80.5 80 19:31:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 50.0 79.4 81 19:32:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 52.5 79.4 82 19:33:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 50.5 81.5 83 19:34:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 52.9 77.6 84 19:35:00 00:01:00.0 66.6 53.2 74.7 85 19:36:00 00:01:00.0 77.2 53.8 84.2 86 19:37:00 00:01:00.0 78.9 61.7 84.7 87 19:38:00 00:01:00.0 65.1 54.7 74.4 88 19:39:00 00:01:00.0 76.9 56.7 87.0 89 19:40:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 54.4 82.4 90 19:41:00 00:01:00.0 67.6 54.5 74.7 91 19:42:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 52.8 75.9 92 19:43:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 51.7 81.0 93 19:44:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 54.9 80.7 94 19:45:00 00:01:00.0 68.2 54.1 76.8 95 19:46:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 53.7 79.3 96 19:47:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 53.8 80.8 97 19:48:00 00:01:00.0 60.8 50.9 69.5 98 19:49:00 00:01:00.0 69.9 49.7 79.7 99 19:50:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 52.3 80.2 100 19:51:00 00:01:00.0 67.0 50.7 77.8 101 19:52:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 51.4 82.2 102 19:53:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 50.6 81.2 103 19:54:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 54.9 79.5 104 19:55:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 61.0 82.5 105 19:56:00 00:01:00.0 68.8 54.0 79.4 106 19:57:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 54.0 79.4 107 19:58:00 00:01:00.0 67.6 51.9 79.4 108 19:59:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 54.1 79.9 109 20:00:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 57.4 78.5 110 20:01:00 00:01:00.0 63.8 49.4 77.5 111 20:02:00 00:01:00.0 66.8 51.1 75.7 112 20:03:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 51.8 76.9 113 20:04:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 49.1 78.1 114 20:05:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 51.0 82.3 115 20:06:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 54.5 80.5 116 20:07:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 53.4 79.9 117 20:08:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 55.9 82.1 118 20:09:00 00:01:00.0 75.1 53.3 85.7 119 20:10:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 54.2 80.9 120 20:11:00 00:01:00.0 67.9 53.5 78.7 121 20:12:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 53.9 81.8 122 20:13:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 53.9 78.5 123 20:14:00 00:01:00.0 68.8 54.1 78.0 124 20:15:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 52.2 81.2 125 20:16:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 53.9 78.7 126 20:17:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 54.9 74.0 127 20:18:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 55.2 81.6 128 20:19:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 56.4 84.1 129 20:20:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 54.6 79.3 130 20:21:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 54.3 82.0 131 20:22:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 53.1 80.3 132 20:23:00 00:01:00.0 63.6 51.7 77.8 133 20:24:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 53.0 80.8 134 20:25:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 53.0 78.7 135 20:26:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 57.1 73.9 136 20:27:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 53.6 81.6 137 20:28:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 52.7 81.4 138 20:29:00 00:01:00.0 68.2 52.8 77.4 139 20:30:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 55.4 79.8 140 20:31:00 00:01:00.0 67.5 55.5 74.1 141 20:32:00 00:01:00.0 67.7 53.5 77.5 142 20:33:00 00:01:00.0 64.7 53.4 76.1 143 20:34:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 55.0 81.1 144 20:35:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 57.2 79.3 145 20:36:00 00:01:00.0 55.2 52.8 63.0 146 20:37:00 00:01:00.0 67.1 54.7 77.7 147 20:38:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 54.3 80.0 148 20:39:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 55.1 80.8 149 20:40:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 55.1 80.0 150 20:41:00 00:01:00.0 68.0 54.4 79.5 151 20:42:00 00:01:00.0 67.5 53.0 73.2 152 20:43:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 54.9 79.5 153 20:44:00 00:01:00.0 65.1 51.6 75.8 154 20:45:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 51.2 79.4 155 20:46:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 56.9 78.8 156 20:47:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 54.6 81.4 157 20:48:00 00:01:00.0 68.0 53.6 79.8 158 20:49:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 56.4 78.6 159 20:50:00 00:01:00.0 69.4 54.7 80.5 160 20:51:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 54.7 78.8 161 20:52:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 56.7 76.8 162 20:53:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 58.2 80.2 163 20:54:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 55.0 79.7 164 20:55:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 54.5 76.7 165 20:56:00 00:01:00.0 67.6 54.1 75.4 166 20:57:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 56.0 75.1 167 20:58:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 55.6 80.6 168 20:59:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 57.2 79.3 169 21:00:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 54.9 84.0 170 21:01:00 00:01:00.0 64.6 54.8 77.4 171 21:02:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 57.0 79.3 172 21:03:00 00:01:00.0 67.1 56.4 78.5 173 21:04:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 55.3 76.5 174 21:05:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 55.2 77.4 175 21:06:00 00:01:00.0 64.5 54.9 74.7 176 21:07:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 55.5 77.7 177 21:08:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 55.4 79.9 178 21:09:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 57.3 79.9 179 21:10:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 55.4 80.9 180 21:11:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 55.6 81.2 181 21:12:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 56.2 80.9 182 21:13:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 57.4 80.8 183 21:14:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 56.0 77.7 184 21:15:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 56.4 80.1 185 21:16:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 57.1 80.4 186 21:17:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 56.9 77.9 187 21:18:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 58.2 79.2 188 21:19:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 56.1 78.0 189 21:20:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 58.2 80.2 190 21:21:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 56.5 79.8 191 21:22:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 57.2 79.6 192 21:23:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 56.1 79.6 193 21:24:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 55.5 82.1 194 21:25:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 55.8 79.9 195 21:26:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 55.0 75.4 196 21:27:00 00:01:00.0 60.5 55.9 68.7 197 21:28:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 55.3 80.9 198 21:29:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 55.3 80.7 199 21:30:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 55.4 79.9 200 21:31:00 00:01:00.0 90.3 59.2 101.8 201 21:32:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 60.6 80.2 202 21:33:00 00:01:00.0 60.7 55.2 73.6 203 21:34:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 55.4 78.6 204 21:35:00 00:01:00.0 61.9 55.6 73.5 205 21:36:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 56.9 74.4 206 21:37:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 56.9 79.3 207 21:38:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 55.6 79.4 208 21:39:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 55.5 78.3 209 21:40:00 00:01:00.0 66.7 56.4 77.4 210 21:41:00 00:01:00.0 69.6 56.0 78.3 211 21:42:00 00:01:00.0 69.5 56.3 82.5 212 21:43:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 55.1 80.4 213 21:44:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 54.8 74.7 214 21:45:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 54.5 80.0 215 21:46:00 00:01:00.0 64.3 54.0 75.9 216 21:47:00 00:01:00.0 63.2 54.1 75.1 217 21:48:00 00:01:00.0 64.6 54.6 76.2 218 21:49:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 56.1 72.5 219 21:50:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 55.3 80.8 220 21:51:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 56.5 82.0 221 21:52:00 00:01:00.0 54.6 53.4 57.4 222 21:53:00 00:01:00.0 54.1 53.4 55.0 223 21:54:00 00:01:00.0 61.8 52.8 72.7 224 21:55:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 52.3 78.0 225 21:56:00 00:01:00.0 63.5 53.0 75.1 226 21:57:00 00:01:00.0 65.1 54.4 71.6 227 21:58:00 00:01:00.0 65.8 54.8 73.0 228 21:59:00 00:01:00.0 64.9 48.6 77.6 229 22:00:00 00:01:00.0 64.9 48.6 73.2 230 22:01:00 00:01:00.0 63.7 48.8 75.6 231 22:02:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 50.4 80.9 232 22:03:00 00:01:00.0 67.1 56.1 77.3 233 22:04:00 00:01:00.0 68.8 54.5 77.7 234 22:05:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 52.5 81.2 235 22:06:00 00:01:00.0 68.2 52.4 80.9 236 22:07:00 00:01:00.0 57.8 51.5 67.1 237 22:08:00 00:01:00.0 68.4 52.4 78.4 238 22:09:00 00:01:00.0 60.3 52.1 69.5 239 22:10:00 00:01:00.0 64.8 51.8 74.0 240 22:11:00 00:01:00.0 58.7 51.2 72.9 241 22:12:00 00:01:00.0 68.2 54.3 78.4 242 22:13:00 00:01:00.0 65.6 52.3 75.6 243 22:14:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 51.8 78.3 244 22:15:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 52.5 76.4 245 22:16:00 00:01:00.0 66.9 54.7 75.1 246 22:17:00 00:01:00.0 63.3 52.5 73.0 247 22:18:00 00:01:00.0 57.2 51.2 67.7 248 22:19:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 51.8 74.8 249 22:20:00 00:01:00.0 67.9 52.4 79.7 250 22:21:00 00:01:00.0 65.8 50.2 78.0 251 22:22:00 00:01:00.0 64.7 51.5 78.8 252 22:23:00 00:01:00.0 66.6 51.8 75.1 253 22:24:00 00:01:00.0 62.9 49.4 70.6 254 22:25:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 49.4 78.8 255 22:26:00 00:01:00.0 62.5 50.9 74.7 256 22:27:00 00:01:00.0 50.9 50.3 51.7 257 22:28:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 50.1 77.6 258 22:29:00 00:01:00.0 60.4 50.5 70.5 259 22:30:00 00:01:00.0 66.2 48.7 79.1 260 22:31:00 00:01:00.0 60.8 51.4 70.4 261 22:32:00 00:01:00.0 51.9 49.0 60.7 262 22:33:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 49.2 78.2 263 22:34:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 49.1 80.3 264 22:35:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 48.5 77.4 265 22:36:00 00:01:00.0 58.4 49.3 69.3 266 22:37:00 00:01:00.0 63.8 49.8 73.4 267 22:38:00 00:01:00.0 67.7 51.0 76.0 268 22:39:00 00:01:00.0 65.8 50.2 74.7 269 22:40:00 00:01:00.0 65.7 48.2 77.1 270 22:41:00 00:01:00.0 61.9 50.3 74.9 271 22:42:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 53.8 79.4 272 22:43:00 00:01:00.0 66.1 51.3 79.0 273 22:44:00 00:01:00.0 60.6 50.1 71.5 274 22:45:00 00:01:00.0 65.2 50.7 75.8 275 22:46:00 00:01:00.0 66.3 54.3 76.7 276 22:47:00 00:01:00.0 68.0 52.7 80.2 277 22:48:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 53.1 79.8 278 22:49:00 00:01:00.0 66.3 52.9 76.8 279 22:50:00 00:01:00.0 62.2 52.6 72.6 280 22:51:00 00:01:00.0 60.3 52.8 70.6 281 22:52:00 00:01:00.0 61.6 53.0 74.2 282 22:53:00 00:01:00.0 66.1 52.8 73.7 283 22:54:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 52.8 76.2 284 22:55:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 53.6 77.8 285 22:56:00 00:01:00.0 65.7 52.6 77.7 286 22:57:00 00:01:00.0 69.6 53.9 81.3 287 22:58:00 00:01:00.0 65.5 53.4 78.3 288 22:59:00 00:01:00.0 65.2 54.2 74.2 289 23:00:00 00:01:00.0 53.6 52.9 54.8 290 23:01:00 00:01:00.0 60.7 53.2 71.0 291 23:02:00 00:01:00.0 53.9 52.9 55.5 292 23:03:00 00:01:00.0 62.8 53.1 70.3 293 23:04:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 53.5 75.3 294 23:05:00 00:01:00.0 64.6 55.6 73.2 295 23:06:00 00:01:00.0 63.9 54.7 72.7 296 23:07:00 00:01:00.0 83.9 64.8 93.0 297 23:08:00 00:01:00.0 64.2 55.5 74.2 298 23:09:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 52.8 79.8 299 23:10:00 00:01:00.0 60.2 52.1 70.5 300 23:11:00 00:01:00.0 54.6 52.4 62.1 301 23:12:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 52.1 78.8 302 23:13:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 54.1 79.5 303 23:14:00 00:01:00.0 60.6 52.5 70.4 304 23:15:00 00:01:00.0 67.5 52.8 78.2 305 23:16:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 53.4 75.5 306 23:17:00 00:01:00.0 65.0 51.1 78.9 307 23:18:00 00:01:00.0 55.3 51.0 66.3 308 23:19:00 00:01:00.0 61.3 50.2 67.9 309 23:20:00 00:01:00.0 67.1 60.3 76.5 310 23:21:00 00:01:00.0 66.3 60.7 77.4 311 23:22:00 00:01:00.0 64.7 60.0 77.1 312 23:23:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 53.2 79.0 313 23:24:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 51.7 75.3 314 23:25:00 00:01:00.0 61.6 53.4 71.0 315 23:26:00 00:01:00.0 53.7 52.7 54.7 316 23:27:00 00:01:00.0 54.0 53.0 55.4 317 23:28:00 00:01:00.0 64.5 52.3 74.3 318 23:29:00 00:01:00.0 64.1 51.7 77.0 319 23:30:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 54.1 75.2 320 23:31:00 00:01:00.0 57.3 52.6 64.8 321 23:32:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 53.0 76.1 322 23:33:00 00:01:00.0 64.5 53.6 76.4 323 23:34:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 52.7 78.7 324 23:35:00 00:01:00.0 63.5 52.6 74.9 325 23:36:00 00:01:00.0 56.8 52.8 70.2 326 23:37:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 52.9 80.5 327 23:38:00 00:01:00.0 64.1 52.8 76.5 328 23:39:00 00:01:00.0 64.8 52.0 77.0 329 23:40:00 00:01:00.0 61.3 52.0 72.2 330 23:41:00 00:01:00.0 58.9 52.1 68.3 331 23:42:00 00:01:00.0 62.4 51.7 74.5 332 23:43:00 00:01:00.0 66.2 50.8 80.8 333 23:44:00 00:01:00.0 51.5 50.5 55.9 334 23:45:00 00:01:00.0 65.7 52.6 76.7 335 23:46:00 00:01:00.0 62.3 51.3 73.0 336 23:47:00 00:01:00.0 52.0 51.2 53.1 337 23:48:00 00:01:00.0 52.2 51.1 54.1 338 23:49:00 00:01:00.0 59.8 51.2 70.4 339 23:50:00 00:01:00.0 51.7 51.1 52.4 340 23:51:00 00:01:00.0 65.8 50.9 75.3 341 23:52:00 00:01:00.0 63.3 51.4 74.3 342 23:53:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 52.1 81.2 343 23:54:00 00:01:00.0 52.6 51.2 55.2 344 23:55:00 00:01:00.0 66.8 51.0 77.7 345 23:56:00 00:01:00.0 52.8 51.3 57.1 346 23:57:00 00:01:00.0 50.7 50.1 51.7 347 23:58:00 00:01:00.0 60.7 50.2 70.1 348 23:59:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 53.9 79.3 349 00:00:00 00:01:00.0 52.5 50.3 58.5 350 00:01:00 00:01:00.0 51.3 50.6 52.4 351 00:02:00 00:01:00.0 50.9 50.3 51.6 352 00:03:00 00:01:00.0 51.3 50.6 52.5 353 00:04:00 00:01:00.0 60.3 51.4 70.4 354 00:05:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 51.4 79.4 355 00:06:00 00:01:00.0 55.1 51.4 65.0 356 00:07:00 00:01:00.0 56.7 51.4 67.7 357 00:08:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 52.0 76.6 358 00:09:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 52.1 78.3 359 00:10:00 00:01:00.0 53.0 51.7 54.3 360 00:11:00 00:01:00.0 64.9 52.8 76.6 361 00:12:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 50.2 85.7 362 00:13:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 49.6 81.8 363 00:14:00 00:01:00.0 61.2 50.0 73.0 364 00:15:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 50.4 77.7 365 00:16:00 00:01:00.0 64.3 51.5 75.4 366 00:17:00 00:01:00.0 53.4 51.4 61.2 367 00:18:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 51.1 73.8 368 00:19:00 00:01:00.0 50.8 49.8 52.3 369 00:20:00 00:01:00.0 62.0 50.3 75.3 370 00:21:00 00:01:00.0 60.8 49.8 76.5 371 00:22:00 00:01:00.0 64.0 49.7 77.6 372 00:23:00 00:01:00.0 62.9 51.2 72.3 373 00:24:00 00:01:00.0 60.0 51.1 71.7 374 00:25:00 00:01:00.0 55.9 49.8 71.1 375 00:26:00 00:01:00.0 50.7 49.0 52.1 376 00:27:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 48.5 74.4 377 00:28:00 00:01:00.0 51.0 48.9 58.2 378 00:29:00 00:01:00.0 56.9 47.4 67.7 379 00:30:00 00:01:00.0 48.5 46.0 51.7 380 00:31:00 00:01:00.0 47.2 46.0 49.3 381 00:32:00 00:01:00.0 57.2 46.7 66.5 382 00:33:00 00:01:00.0 62.3 49.8 72.1 383 00:34:00 00:01:00.0 49.8 47.7 52.9 384 00:35:00 00:01:00.0 49.7 47.0 51.5 385 00:36:00 00:01:00.0 49.8 48.8 51.3 386 00:37:00 00:01:00.0 50.3 48.1 54.8 387 00:38:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 49.5 82.6 388 00:39:00 00:01:00.0 61.0 49.7 72.9 389 00:40:00 00:01:00.0 63.2 49.0 77.1 390 00:41:00 00:01:00.0 49.3 48.6 49.9 391 00:42:00 00:01:00.0 61.2 48.9 73.6 392 00:43:00 00:01:00.0 67.9 46.7 81.7 393 00:44:00 00:01:00.0 45.3 44.3 46.9 394 00:45:00 00:01:00.0 45.1 44.5 46.1 395 00:46:00 00:01:00.0 45.7 44.7 47.1 396 00:47:00 00:01:00.0 49.1 46.1 50.2 397 00:48:00 00:01:00.0 63.4 48.2 73.3 398 00:49:00 00:01:00.0 56.6 47.4 66.4 399 00:50:00 00:01:00.0 49.1 48.2 49.9 400 00:51:00 00:01:00.0 49.3 48.1 49.9 401 00:52:00 00:01:00.0 59.9 48.3 70.4 402 00:53:00 00:01:00.0 49.6 47.3 54.9 403 00:54:00 00:01:00.0 60.9 45.3 72.8 404 00:55:00 00:01:00.0 45.7 44.6 48.7 405 00:56:00 00:01:00.0 45.8 44.8 48.4 406 00:57:00 00:01:00.0 48.0 45.5 51.7 407 00:58:00 00:01:00.0 49.0 48.2 51.3 408 00:59:00 00:01:00.0 49.4 48.7 52.9 409 01:00:00 00:01:00.0 64.4 48.5 77.3 410 01:01:00 00:01:00.0 48.5 45.4 49.7 411 01:02:00 00:01:00.0 64.0 44.4 78.9 412 01:03:00 00:01:00.0 45.7 44.6 46.9 413 01:04:00 00:01:00.0 64.3 45.1 75.8 414 01:05:00 00:01:00.0 56.3 46.8 69.1 415 01:06:00 00:01:00.0 65.0 47.0 75.3 416 01:07:00 00:01:00.0 46.8 44.9 49.8 417 01:08:00 00:01:00.0 62.8 45.4 75.4 418 01:09:00 00:01:00.0 46.1 44.5 49.3 419 01:10:00 00:01:00.0 45.6 44.8 47.5 420 01:11:00 00:01:00.0 55.8 45.2 69.8 421 01:12:00 00:01:00.0 65.9 44.3 80.0 422 01:13:00 00:01:00.0 62.6 44.9 73.6 423 01:14:00 00:01:00.0 62.8 45.4 72.9 424 01:15:00 00:01:00.0 52.7 45.3 61.9 425 01:16:00 00:01:00.0 66.5 46.5 77.0 426 01:17:00 00:01:00.0 50.3 45.1 62.7 427 01:18:00 00:01:00.0 64.5 45.0 77.5 428 01:19:00 00:01:00.0 46.1 43.3 49.7 429 01:20:00 00:01:00.0 44.9 43.5 46.2 430 01:21:00 00:01:00.0 56.2 45.6 66.2 431 01:22:00 00:01:00.0 61.0 45.4 72.9 432 01:23:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 45.7 47.6 433 01:24:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 45.4 49.1 434 01:25:00 00:01:00.0 45.5 44.3 47.2 435 01:26:00 00:01:00.0 47.5 44.6 50.4 436 01:27:00 00:01:00.0 47.7 46.1 49.7 437 01:28:00 00:01:00.0 46.1 45.0 48.8 438 01:29:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 45.0 48.0 439 01:30:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 45.2 48.5 440 01:31:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 45.4 48.3 441 01:32:00 00:01:00.0 47.4 45.5 49.2 442 01:33:00 00:01:00.0 47.1 45.9 50.6 443 01:34:00 00:01:00.0 65.2 46.3 78.3 444 01:35:00 00:01:00.0 53.3 45.2 64.8 445 01:36:00 00:01:00.0 63.5 46.2 74.7 446 01:37:00 00:01:00.0 45.6 44.8 46.5 447 01:38:00 00:01:00.0 44.9 44.0 46.2 448 01:39:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 43.7 55.9 449 01:40:00 00:01:00.0 45.6 44.5 48.1 450 01:41:00 00:01:00.0 64.6 46.2 77.8 451 01:42:00 00:01:00.0 47.3 46.5 48.2 452 01:43:00 00:01:00.0 65.3 47.1 77.4 453 01:44:00 00:01:00.0 47.2 46.4 48.7 454 01:45:00 00:01:00.0 54.2 45.8 63.3 455 01:46:00 00:01:00.0 59.9 45.3 74.0 456 01:47:00 00:01:00.0 45.8 44.9 48.9 457 01:48:00 00:01:00.0 47.1 45.0 52.0 458 01:49:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 45.6 48.7 459 01:50:00 00:01:00.0 45.8 44.9 47.5 460 01:51:00 00:01:00.0 45.7 44.5 48.6 461 01:52:00 00:01:00.0 54.4 44.2 68.1 462 01:53:00 00:01:00.0 60.3 44.4 71.1 463 01:54:00 00:01:00.0 44.9 44.1 45.6 464 01:55:00 00:01:00.0 45.2 44.6 46.2 465 01:56:00 00:01:00.0 45.2 44.2 46.7 466 01:57:00 00:01:00.0 45.6 44.6 46.7 467 01:58:00 00:01:00.0 46.3 45.4 47.0 468 01:59:00 00:01:00.0 46.5 44.8 51.1 469 02:00:00 00:01:00.0 66.6 45.5 78.4 470 02:01:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 46.7 78.0 471 02:02:00 00:01:00.0 46.6 45.3 48.8 472 02:03:00 00:01:00.0 46.7 44.8 49.7 473 02:04:00 00:01:00.0 45.0 44.4 45.8 474 02:05:00 00:01:00.0 45.4 44.5 46.3 475 02:06:00 00:01:00.0 64.2 45.0 78.0 476 02:07:00 00:01:00.0 63.9 45.9 76.4 477 02:08:00 00:01:00.0 46.1 45.2 48.2 478 02:09:00 00:01:00.0 47.2 45.5 49.9 479 02:10:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 46.0 75.0 480 02:11:00 00:01:00.0 48.5 47.6 49.5 481 02:12:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 48.7 81.3 482 02:13:00 00:01:00.0 48.8 47.4 53.4 483 02:14:00 00:01:00.0 49.0 48.1 50.4 484 02:15:00 00:01:00.0 48.9 48.1 50.0 485 02:16:00 00:01:00.0 48.3 47.5 49.1 486 02:17:00 00:01:00.0 48.6 48.0 49.2 487 02:18:00 00:01:00.0 49.5 48.2 51.6 488 02:19:00 00:01:00.0 50.2 49.1 52.3 489 02:20:00 00:01:00.0 64.4 49.1 76.1 490 02:21:00 00:01:00.0 61.6 54.0 72.4 491 02:22:00 00:01:00.0 53.0 52.0 55.2 492 02:23:00 00:01:00.0 52.3 51.9 52.8 493 02:24:00 00:01:00.0 52.7 52.4 53.0 494 02:25:00 00:01:00.0 53.1 52.5 55.7 495 02:26:00 00:01:00.0 67.0 52.6 76.4 496 02:27:00 00:01:00.0 52.8 52.5 53.3 497 02:28:00 00:01:00.0 51.7 48.8 53.1 498 02:29:00 00:01:00.0 48.1 47.4 49.4 499 02:30:00 00:01:00.0 48.4 47.6 50.0 500 02:31:00 00:01:00.0 49.9 48.0 52.5 501 02:32:00 00:01:00.0 54.2 47.6 66.2 502 02:33:00 00:01:00.0 60.3 47.7 72.0 503 02:34:00 00:01:00.0 47.4 46.2 48.8 504 02:35:00 00:01:00.0 47.7 46.5 49.7 505 02:36:00 00:01:00.0 46.9 46.1 48.0 506 02:37:00 00:01:00.0 46.7 45.6 49.4 507 02:38:00 00:01:00.0 46.6 45.4 48.2 508 02:39:00 00:01:00.0 48.6 46.7 52.9 509 02:40:00 00:01:00.0 61.0 46.2 72.9 510 02:41:00 00:01:00.0 47.4 46.2 49.2 511 02:42:00 00:01:00.0 47.9 45.8 50.2 512 02:43:00 00:01:00.0 48.6 46.8 52.1 513 02:44:00 00:01:00.0 50.8 47.1 57.6 514 02:45:00 00:01:00.0 58.6 47.2 69.5 515 02:46:00 00:01:00.0 47.2 46.2 50.3 516 02:47:00 00:01:00.0 52.2 46.7 64.7 517 02:48:00 00:01:00.0 57.5 48.4 69.1 518 02:49:00 00:01:00.0 59.5 49.0 70.7 519 02:50:00 00:01:00.0 50.8 49.1 52.2 520 02:51:00 00:01:00.0 52.1 50.7 55.1 521 02:52:00 00:01:00.0 51.2 50.2 53.8 522 02:53:00 00:01:00.0 50.8 49.9 52.8 523 02:54:00 00:01:00.0 52.3 50.9 54.9 524 02:55:00 00:01:00.0 53.3 52.1 55.7 525 02:56:00 00:01:00.0 52.8 51.8 55.0 526 02:57:00 00:01:00.0 52.2 51.2 54.5 527 02:58:00 00:01:00.0 54.2 52.1 56.2 528 02:59:00 00:01:00.0 53.6 52.4 54.6 529 03:00:00 00:01:00.0 51.8 50.5 53.8 530 03:01:00 00:01:00.0 50.7 49.6 52.5 531 03:02:00 00:01:00.0 50.8 49.6 53.1 532 03:03:00 00:01:00.0 51.6 50.0 54.3 533 03:04:00 00:01:00.0 50.5 49.4 52.1 534 03:05:00 00:01:00.0 50.4 49.5 51.6 535 03:06:00 00:01:00.0 53.8 50.9 57.7 536 03:07:00 00:01:00.0 53.1 52.3 53.9 537 03:08:00 00:01:00.0 54.1 53.0 56.1 538 03:09:00 00:01:00.0 53.6 51.6 55.3 539 03:10:00 00:01:00.0 51.9 51.2 52.8 540 03:11:00 00:01:00.0 51.4 50.7 52.3 541 03:12:00 00:01:00.0 52.5 51.0 53.4 542 03:13:00 00:01:00.0 51.8 50.9 52.7 543 03:14:00 00:01:00.0 53.3 51.8 54.3 544 03:15:00 00:01:00.0 57.0 52.7 62.6 545 03:16:00 00:01:00.0 54.9 53.8 56.2 546 03:17:00 00:01:00.0 61.4 51.8 72.5 547 03:18:00 00:01:00.0 52.5 51.8 53.6 548 03:19:00 00:01:00.0 52.9 52.2 53.9 549 03:20:00 00:01:00.0 58.7 51.7 68.6 550 03:21:00 00:01:00.0 53.6 52.2 54.5 551 03:22:00 00:01:00.0 54.7 53.0 56.7 552 03:23:00 00:01:00.0 55.6 53.1 58.1 553 03:24:00 00:01:00.0 59.4 51.7 70.2 554 03:25:00 00:01:00.0 61.7 52.4 72.9 555 03:26:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 51.3 74.7 556 03:27:00 00:01:00.0 69.6 50.7 82.0 557 03:28:00 00:01:00.0 49.9 49.3 51.6 558 03:29:00 00:01:00.0 49.4 49.0 50.0 559 03:30:00 00:01:00.0 50.3 49.1 52.8 560 03:31:00 00:01:00.0 50.2 49.3 51.7 561 03:32:00 00:01:00.0 52.5 50.0 56.1 562 03:33:00 00:01:00.0 75.2 51.9 86.0 563 03:34:00 00:01:00.0 55.8 49.8 65.7 564 03:35:00 00:01:00.0 52.3 49.2 64.6 565 03:36:00 00:01:00.0 68.9 49.9 79.5 566 03:37:00 00:01:00.0 59.9 48.6 69.2 567 03:38:00 00:01:00.0 65.1 48.8 79.3 568 03:39:00 00:01:00.0 49.8 48.5 53.5 569 03:40:00 00:01:00.0 50.7 48.8 53.9 570 03:41:00 00:01:00.0 49.4 48.2 52.3 571 03:42:00 00:01:00.0 51.1 49.5 54.1 572 03:43:00 00:01:00.0 51.1 49.9 55.2 573 03:44:00 00:01:00.0 61.7 49.9 73.5 574 03:45:00 00:01:00.0 53.2 50.3 68.1 575 03:46:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 52.2 82.7 576 03:47:00 00:01:00.0 52.5 51.1 62.6 577 03:48:00 00:01:00.0 51.9 51.3 53.1 578 03:49:00 00:01:00.0 52.6 51.5 54.9 579 03:50:00 00:01:00.0 52.3 50.8 55.9 580 03:51:00 00:01:00.0 51.4 49.8 54.3 581 03:52:00 00:01:00.0 61.2 49.9 71.3 582 03:53:00 00:01:00.0 64.1 50.6 77.3 583 03:54:00 00:01:00.0 62.4 51.3 76.5 584 03:55:00 00:01:00.0 55.4 50.1 69.4 585 03:56:00 00:01:00.0 51.8 50.1 58.2 586 03:57:00 00:01:00.0 51.9 50.1 57.4 587 03:58:00 00:01:00.0 52.2 51.3 54.3 588 03:59:00 00:01:00.0 63.0 51.7 70.9 589 04:00:00 00:01:00.0 51.7 50.4 56.8 590 04:01:00 00:01:00.0 61.6 50.9 70.3 591 04:02:00 00:01:00.0 55.9 49.8 68.4 592 04:03:00 00:01:00.0 51.4 49.9 52.6 593 04:04:00 00:01:00.0 51.3 50.6 52.5 594 04:05:00 00:01:00.0 51.4 50.7 52.2 595 04:06:00 00:01:00.0 60.0 50.5 70.2 596 04:07:00 00:01:00.0 62.7 51.6 73.5 597 04:08:00 00:01:00.0 52.6 51.4 56.8 598 04:09:00 00:01:00.0 52.7 51.6 54.1 599 04:10:00 00:01:00.0 52.6 51.3 54.2 600 04:11:00 00:01:00.0 53.4 51.7 55.5 601 04:12:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 54.8 80.4 602 04:13:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 56.3 82.5 603 04:14:00 00:01:00.0 54.6 53.4 56.4 604 04:15:00 00:01:00.0 62.5 53.6 71.8 605 04:16:00 00:01:00.0 63.3 53.6 74.0 606 04:17:00 00:01:00.0 56.9 54.2 71.3 607 04:18:00 00:01:00.0 61.7 53.2 73.1 608 04:19:00 00:01:00.0 54.2 53.6 54.9 609 04:20:00 00:01:00.0 55.1 53.8 60.2 610 04:21:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 54.8 78.2 611 04:22:00 00:01:00.0 54.8 54.1 55.5 612 04:23:00 00:01:00.0 55.5 54.7 56.9 613 04:24:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 55.3 77.8 614 04:25:00 00:01:00.0 56.0 54.9 57.9 615 04:26:00 00:01:00.0 61.4 54.9 71.5 616 04:27:00 00:01:00.0 59.8 54.9 68.6 617 04:28:00 00:01:00.0 56.8 55.2 58.5 618 04:29:00 00:01:00.0 61.1 55.1 71.1 619 04:30:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 56.2 79.1 620 04:31:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 56.0 79.5 621 04:32:00 00:01:00.0 62.6 55.1 72.0 622 04:33:00 00:01:00.0 61.5 55.2 70.5 623 04:34:00 00:01:00.0 62.5 54.9 73.8 624 04:35:00 00:01:00.0 55.7 54.7 57.6 625 04:36:00 00:01:00.0 56.5 55.4 57.8 626 04:37:00 00:01:00.0 66.2 55.4 73.9 627 04:38:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 54.9 79.1 628 04:39:00 00:01:00.0 64.2 55.6 75.9 629 04:40:00 00:01:00.0 65.5 55.7 73.8 630 04:41:00 00:01:00.0 64.0 56.7 73.7 631 04:42:00 00:01:00.0 63.0 55.0 73.3 632 04:43:00 00:01:00.0 62.8 55.6 70.4 633 04:44:00 00:01:00.0 59.2 53.0 67.7 634 04:45:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 55.6 75.8 635 04:46:00 00:01:00.0 68.4 54.8 81.8 636 04:47:00 00:01:00.0 55.6 54.5 57.1 637 04:48:00 00:01:00.0 68.0 55.5 76.1 638 04:49:00 00:01:00.0 67.0 55.2 74.8 639 04:50:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 54.9 74.9 640 04:51:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 55.6 80.3 641 04:52:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 55.6 80.6 642 04:53:00 00:01:00.0 62.1 54.7 73.1 643 04:54:00 00:01:00.0 69.4 55.3 82.2 644 04:55:00 00:01:00.0 56.2 54.6 59.8 645 04:56:00 00:01:00.0 59.5 55.2 67.2 646 04:57:00 00:01:00.0 56.0 55.1 57.9 647 04:58:00 00:01:00.0 64.8 54.9 75.1 648 04:59:00 00:01:00.0 55.3 54.2 56.8 649 05:00:00 00:01:00.0 65.3 55.4 74.6 650 05:01:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 56.4 73.7 651 05:02:00 00:01:00.0 65.8 56.2 77.5 652 05:03:00 00:01:00.0 60.3 55.2 70.5 653 05:04:00 00:01:00.0 59.4 56.1 68.7 654 05:05:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 56.1 78.2 655 05:06:00 00:01:00.0 65.9 56.7 75.4 656 05:07:00 00:01:00.0 63.8 56.0 74.1 657 05:08:00 00:01:00.0 61.0 55.4 70.7 658 05:09:00 00:01:00.0 60.9 56.0 71.3 659 05:10:00 00:01:00.0 60.8 56.5 71.9 660 05:11:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 57.4 79.4 661 05:12:00 00:01:00.0 65.8 57.9 75.4 662 05:13:00 00:01:00.0 62.4 57.1 72.7 663 05:14:00 00:01:00.0 63.6 55.8 74.2 664 05:15:00 00:01:00.0 66.1 57.1 77.0 665 05:16:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 56.5 77.2 666 05:17:00 00:01:00.0 67.7 57.4 80.1 667 05:18:00 00:01:00.0 57.5 56.7 58.6 668 05:19:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 57.7 79.8 669 05:20:00 00:01:00.0 66.7 57.8 79.1 670 05:21:00 00:01:00.0 67.5 56.8 75.1 671 05:22:00 00:01:00.0 58.4 57.0 62.1 672 05:23:00 00:01:00.0 58.4 56.8 62.7 673 05:24:00 00:01:00.0 65.8 57.6 76.9 674 05:25:00 00:01:00.0 66.2 58.2 72.8 675 05:26:00 00:01:00.0 60.1 57.7 66.4 676 05:27:00 00:01:00.0 60.0 58.4 64.3 677 05:28:00 00:01:00.0 65.3 59.0 73.1 678 05:29:00 00:01:00.0 64.5 60.2 73.9 679 05:30:00 00:01:00.0 63.7 59.3 73.3 680 05:31:00 00:01:00.0 67.7 60.3 72.8 681 05:32:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 61.7 78.2 682 05:33:00 00:01:00.0 67.9 59.6 76.2 683 05:34:00 00:01:00.0 66.7 59.5 80.6 684 05:35:00 00:01:00.0 66.9 59.5 76.0 685 05:36:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 58.5 76.6 686 05:37:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 58.8 77.3 687 05:38:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 59.4 76.4 688 05:39:00 00:01:00.0 65.5 58.6 73.3 689 05:40:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 58.3 81.0 690 05:41:00 00:01:00.0 63.3 57.5 70.7 691 05:42:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 59.1 78.0 692 05:43:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 57.1 84.3 693 05:44:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 57.0 84.0 694 05:45:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 59.3 75.7 695 05:46:00 00:01:00.0 66.5 58.2 75.7 696 05:47:00 00:01:00.0 65.2 58.6 74.4 697 05:48:00 00:01:00.0 68.4 58.6 76.0 698 05:49:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 58.3 84.1 699 05:50:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 57.7 79.6 700 05:51:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 57.0 82.4 701 05:52:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 58.9 78.1 702 05:53:00 00:01:00.0 64.9 56.9 73.5 703 05:54:00 00:01:00.0 77.2 56.5 86.9 704 05:55:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 59.0 77.6 705 05:56:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 59.1 83.7 706 05:57:00 00:01:00.0 68.4 57.2 74.6 707 05:58:00 00:01:00.0 64.7 57.8 72.6 708 05:59:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 56.4 76.2 709 06:00:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 57.8 75.4 710 06:01:00 00:01:00.0 64.3 57.8 73.9 711 06:02:00 00:01:00.0 67.0 58.4 76.4 712 06:03:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 57.5 79.2 713 06:04:00 00:01:00.0 63.1 56.7 71.5 714 06:05:00 00:01:00.0 66.0 58.6 72.8 715 06:06:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 58.1 74.3 716 06:07:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 58.2 80.7 717 06:08:00 00:01:00.0 63.2 57.4 71.7 718 06:09:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 59.3 74.0 719 06:10:00 00:01:00.0 66.7 57.6 75.3 720 06:11:00 00:01:00.0 67.6 57.2 79.7 721 06:12:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 57.6 82.2 722 06:13:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 59.1 79.5 723 06:14:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 57.6 77.0 724 06:15:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 56.9 86.9 725 06:16:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 61.0 77.5 726 06:17:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 62.5 78.4 727 06:18:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 60.1 84.5 728 06:19:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 58.3 82.0 729 06:20:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 62.2 78.7 730 06:21:00 00:01:00.0 64.5 58.1 72.8 731 06:22:00 00:01:00.0 67.0 58.4 73.4 732 06:23:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 59.0 80.3 733 06:24:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 59.0 79.4 734 06:25:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 58.4 81.6 735 06:26:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 58.1 75.0 736 06:27:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 60.2 87.1 737 06:28:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 57.1 79.9 738 06:29:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 57.1 78.5 739 06:30:00 00:01:00.0 68.0 57.8 73.9 740 06:31:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 58.3 80.2 741 06:32:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 59.0 76.2 742 06:33:00 00:01:00.0 65.1 56.8 74.4 743 06:34:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 60.5 81.5 744 06:35:00 00:01:00.0 74.8 60.9 82.6 745 06:36:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 58.1 80.1 746 06:37:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 58.1 77.7 747 06:38:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 57.6 83.2 748 06:39:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 58.3 81.6 749 06:40:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 58.7 79.6 750 06:41:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 57.4 79.9 751 06:42:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 57.2 79.7 752 06:43:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 57.9 82.6 753 06:44:00 00:01:00.0 68.4 58.6 76.5 754 06:45:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 58.1 77.4 755 06:46:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 58.0 74.9 756 06:47:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 58.8 81.6 757 06:48:00 00:01:00.0 75.8 63.4 82.6 758 06:49:00 00:01:00.0 76.9 57.6 86.2 759 06:50:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 58.7 81.4 760 06:51:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 61.5 80.4 761 06:52:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 58.0 82.5 762 06:53:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 57.8 78.0 763 06:54:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 61.9 84.2 764 06:55:00 00:01:00.0 71.9 58.2 78.4 765 06:56:00 00:01:00.0 71.9 57.9 80.0 766 06:57:00 00:01:00.0 76.4 58.9 83.7 767 06:58:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 58.2 77.2 768 06:59:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 59.2 76.0 769 07:00:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 57.7 79.2 770 07:01:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 60.0 84.6 771 07:02:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 58.9 82.7 772 07:03:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 60.5 79.2 773 07:04:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 58.0 81.1 774 07:05:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 58.2 76.2 775 07:06:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 60.8 81.9 776 07:07:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 58.6 79.7 777 07:08:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 62.9 79.6 778 07:09:00 00:01:00.0 75.9 57.9 85.6 779 07:10:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 57.9 83.2 780 07:11:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 61.6 79.2 781 07:12:00 00:01:00.0 77.7 60.1 87.2 782 07:13:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 59.8 81.3 783 07:14:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 58.5 79.4 784 07:15:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 58.0 81.6 785 07:16:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 59.4 77.2 786 07:17:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 59.3 80.6 787 07:18:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 63.5 79.3 788 07:19:00 00:01:00.0 68.4 58.8 76.4 789 07:20:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 58.7 80.2 790 07:21:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 59.2 80.1 791 07:22:00 00:01:00.0 69.9 60.3 77.9 792 07:23:00 00:01:00.0 75.8 60.8 85.1 793 07:24:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 62.4 77.2 794 07:25:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 59.7 82.0 795 07:26:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 58.6 79.1 796 07:27:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 59.6 79.7 797 07:28:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 60.1 79.3 798 07:29:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 58.4 80.9 799 07:30:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 58.2 80.0 800 07:31:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 59.2 81.0 801 07:32:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 58.8 82.6 802 07:33:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 61.0 79.5 803 07:34:00 00:01:00.0 69.9 59.1 77.7 804 07:35:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 59.9 81.3 805 07:36:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 58.7 76.7 806 07:37:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 59.0 78.5 807 07:38:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 59.9 79.6 808 07:39:00 00:01:00.0 76.2 58.5 86.6 809 07:40:00 00:01:00.0 75.2 65.6 81.9 810 07:41:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 62.7 79.0 811 07:42:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 59.4 78.6 812 07:43:00 00:01:00.0 75.3 62.5 82.1 813 07:44:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 61.4 78.4 814 07:45:00 00:01:00.0 76.3 58.0 84.9 815 07:46:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 61.8 79.2 816 07:47:00 00:01:00.0 75.4 62.1 80.5 817 07:48:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 61.0 81.8 818 07:49:00 00:01:00.0 79.8 63.6 87.6 819 07:50:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 64.7 82.7 820 07:51:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 61.4 82.7 821 07:52:00 00:01:00.0 75.4 59.5 82.5 822 07:53:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 64.2 81.7 823 07:54:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 60.1 82.2 824 07:55:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 60.1 83.5 825 07:56:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 59.3 80.5 826 07:57:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 63.3 81.7 827 07:58:00 00:01:00.0 74.8 57.5 83.2 828 07:59:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 57.7 80.1 829 08:00:00 00:01:00.0 76.4 63.5 84.9 830 08:01:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 59.2 81.8 831 08:02:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 57.6 82.1 832 08:03:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 57.0 77.9 833 08:04:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 58.3 80.0 834 08:05:00 00:01:00.0 74.8 59.2 81.5 835 08:06:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 59.5 79.1 836 08:07:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 56.9 81.0 837 08:08:00 00:01:00.0 76.0 59.4 81.9 838 08:09:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 58.4 81.8 839 08:10:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 56.9 79.9 840 08:11:00 00:01:00.0 75.0 60.8 83.2 841 08:12:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 58.4 79.9 842 08:13:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 57.7 83.5 843 08:14:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 60.4 79.6 844 08:15:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 58.0 81.4 845 08:16:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 61.1 80.0 846 08:17:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 58.2 79.8 847 08:18:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 57.6 78.3 848 08:19:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 63.4 84.5 849 08:20:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 58.6 82.7 850 08:21:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 57.8 77.4 851 08:22:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 61.5 79.1 852 08:23:00 00:01:00.0 76.7 64.3 81.4 853 08:24:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 56.6 79.6 854 08:25:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 57.4 79.9 855 08:26:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 57.1 78.0 856 08:27:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 57.8 81.9 857 08:28:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 57.9 83.2 858 08:29:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 57.3 82.2 859 08:30:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 58.9 82.5 860 08:31:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 56.6 74.4 861 08:32:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 59.7 78.6 862 08:33:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 57.1 79.6 863 08:34:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 60.0 82.3 864 08:35:00 00:01:00.0 75.5 62.7 81.8 865 08:36:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 56.2 76.4 866 08:37:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 57.7 75.8 867 08:38:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 56.5 81.6 868 08:39:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 56.6 82.3 869 08:40:00 00:01:00.0 74.8 55.4 81.1 870 08:41:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 67.5 80.2 871 08:42:00 00:01:00.0 75.6 62.5 85.4 872 08:43:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 57.5 74.9 873 08:44:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 54.4 76.2 874 08:45:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 57.1 81.2 875 08:46:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 57.2 79.0 876 08:47:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 61.2 78.7 877 08:48:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 57.8 81.9 878 08:49:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 61.2 79.6 879 08:50:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 58.1 83.5 880 08:51:00 00:01:00.0 75.4 60.2 87.1 881 08:52:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 60.2 86.7 882 08:53:00 00:01:00.0 77.0 60.7 86.0 883 08:54:00 00:01:00.0 69.5 57.6 81.7 884 08:55:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 58.2 82.0 885 08:56:00 00:01:00.0 67.9 54.7 75.0 886 08:57:00 00:01:00.0 69.5 55.7 76.8 887 08:58:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 63.5 81.8 888 08:59:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 56.5 73.6 889 09:00:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 65.1 77.6 890 09:01:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 57.2 77.4 891 09:02:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 55.9 79.8 892 09:03:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 54.9 77.8 893 09:04:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 58.3 82.0 894 09:05:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 54.8 80.0 895 09:06:00 00:01:00.0 66.6 54.0 77.5 896 09:07:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 59.4 82.4 897 09:08:00 00:01:00.0 69.6 54.1 78.7 898 09:09:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 55.4 75.5 899 09:10:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 58.8 81.0 900 09:11:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 55.2 79.2 901 09:12:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 55.1 78.8 902 09:13:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 54.3 78.5 903 09:14:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 54.5 81.7 904 09:15:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 54.4 76.3 905 09:16:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 55.9 80.0 906 09:17:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 55.1 80.3 907 09:18:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 55.4 79.0 908 09:19:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 58.9 80.8 909 09:20:00 00:01:00.0 69.5 54.6 77.9 910 09:21:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 58.9 79.8 911 09:22:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 54.0 78.4 912 09:23:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 54.6 79.3 913 09:24:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 52.5 79.2 914 09:25:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 54.2 82.6 915 09:26:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 54.2 77.1 916 09:27:00 00:01:00.0 69.5 58.7 78.4 917 09:28:00 00:01:00.0 66.1 53.9 77.8 918 09:29:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 55.7 84.4 919 09:30:00 00:01:00.0 66.2 54.4 77.9 920 09:31:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 61.7 76.9 921 09:32:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 58.9 85.4 922 09:33:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 53.6 88.2 923 09:34:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 54.4 77.4 924 09:35:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 52.2 81.4 925 09:36:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 52.5 79.9 926 09:37:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 57.8 77.5 927 09:38:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 55.4 79.3 928 09:39:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 57.1 82.2 929 09:40:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 55.4 79.9 930 09:41:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 52.9 79.4 931 09:42:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 54.7 75.1 932 09:43:00 00:01:00.0 78.3 55.2 88.7 933 09:44:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 52.4 79.3 934 09:45:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 56.8 82.1 935 09:46:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 54.7 80.5 936 09:47:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 51.6 80.5 937 09:48:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 54.7 80.5 938 09:49:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 53.4 80.9 939 09:50:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 55.3 80.8 940 09:51:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 51.1 85.9 941 09:52:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 54.5 79.9 942 09:53:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 54.0 79.4 943 09:54:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 54.3 82.4 944 09:55:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 52.8 81.0 945 09:56:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 52.8 81.5 946 09:57:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 51.4 76.5 947 09:58:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 54.5 79.8 948 09:59:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 52.8 80.9 949 10:00:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 52.8 83.2 950 10:01:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 50.9 78.9 951 10:02:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 50.8 82.0 952 10:03:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 52.9 78.9 953 10:04:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 52.1 79.8 954 10:05:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 56.5 76.5 955 10:06:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 51.4 82.3 956 10:07:00 00:01:00.0 71.9 50.8 83.1 957 10:08:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 50.6 78.9 958 10:09:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 53.1 85.4 959 10:10:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 51.9 83.8 960 10:11:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 59.2 84.6 961 10:12:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 51.0 80.8 962 10:13:00 00:01:00.0 67.6 51.3 78.2 963 10:14:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 54.3 77.8 964 10:15:00 00:01:00.0 68.9 52.4 75.7 965 10:16:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 52.7 85.3 966 10:17:00 00:01:00.0 66.7 50.9 76.5 967 10:18:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 57.1 83.1 968 10:19:00 00:01:00.0 69.9 52.0 80.4 969 10:20:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 51.7 79.4 970 10:21:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 52.2 81.8 971 10:22:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 52.9 81.5 972 10:23:00 00:01:00.0 64.9 51.5 73.5 973 10:24:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 54.7 82.0 974 10:25:00 00:01:00.0 66.6 52.4 77.6 975 10:26:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 52.1 79.8 976 10:27:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 53.0 81.8 977 10:28:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 55.4 79.0 978 10:29:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 59.0 82.0 979 10:30:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 54.9 81.6 980 10:31:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 55.1 79.2 981 10:32:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 55.9 82.2 982 10:33:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 51.9 80.7 983 10:34:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 50.7 82.0 984 10:35:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 56.9 82.2 985 10:36:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 60.5 83.2 986 10:37:00 00:01:00.0 65.7 50.9 74.0 987 10:38:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 56.6 80.9 988 10:39:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 51.4 77.6 989 10:40:00 00:01:00.0 76.2 55.4 88.8 990 10:41:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 53.2 78.1 991 10:42:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 53.1 80.6 992 10:43:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 53.6 81.2 993 10:44:00 00:01:00.0 67.0 51.9 76.0 994 10:45:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 59.6 75.3 995 10:46:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 51.9 81.4 996 10:47:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 52.2 78.1 997 10:48:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 53.3 77.1 998 10:49:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 57.8 80.8 999 10:50:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 55.1 80.0 1000 10:51:00 00:01:00.0 68.8 54.2 77.9 1001 10:52:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 54.1 78.7 1002 10:53:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 54.3 73.4 1003 10:54:00 00:01:00.0 67.6 54.7 77.9 1004 10:55:00 00:01:00.0 66.6 52.5 73.7 1005 10:56:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 53.9 84.3 1006 10:57:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 54.9 82.9 1007 10:58:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 56.6 80.4 1008 10:59:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 56.3 79.7 1009 11:00:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 52.8 81.1 1010 11:01:00 00:01:00.0 69.5 55.4 78.2 1011 11:02:00 00:01:00.0 71.9 60.8 82.6 1012 11:03:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 51.9 82.1 1013 11:04:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 54.8 77.7 1014 11:05:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 58.1 77.8 1015 11:06:00 00:01:00.0 76.9 53.8 87.2 1016 11:07:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 50.6 80.8 1017 11:08:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 53.0 85.9 1018 11:09:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 55.9 77.3 1019 11:10:00 00:01:00.0 67.0 51.9 77.1 1020 11:11:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 60.2 81.6 1021 11:12:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 51.2 81.6 1022 11:13:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 52.3 80.0 1023 11:14:00 00:01:00.0 64.2 55.8 74.2 1024 11:15:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 48.9 79.8 1025 11:16:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 50.9 79.4 1026 11:17:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 52.5 79.0 1027 11:18:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 58.6 79.3 1028 11:19:00 00:01:00.0 60.4 49.8 69.7 1029 11:20:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 53.6 78.3 1030 11:21:00 00:01:00.0 69.5 51.3 77.0 1031 11:22:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 53.7 80.6 1032 11:23:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 53.9 79.2 1033 11:24:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 59.4 80.4 1034 11:25:00 00:01:00.0 67.6 50.2 75.3 1035 11:26:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 51.7 81.6 1036 11:27:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 50.1 78.4 1037 11:28:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 54.8 83.9 1038 11:29:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 53.3 79.3 1039 11:30:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 50.1 79.8 1040 11:31:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 50.1 83.0 1041 11:32:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 54.1 80.5 1042 11:33:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 54.2 76.8 1043 11:34:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 55.2 81.5 1044 11:35:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 53.4 79.1 1045 11:36:00 00:01:00.0 75.4 52.4 83.0 1046 11:37:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 54.4 76.0 1047 11:38:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 55.6 84.8 1048 11:39:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 50.2 78.0 1049 11:40:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 49.5 78.8 1050 11:41:00 00:01:00.0 68.8 50.1 78.7 1051 11:42:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 53.0 79.7 1052 11:43:00 00:01:00.0 66.4 51.4 78.2 1053 11:44:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 51.8 82.6 1054 11:45:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 50.6 79.8 1055 11:46:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 54.7 78.2 1056 11:47:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 60.3 82.8 1057 11:48:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 54.3 82.3 1058 11:49:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 56.6 79.0 1059 11:50:00 00:01:00.0 68.2 60.2 74.9 1060 11:51:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 57.8 81.2 1061 11:52:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 56.9 81.2 1062 11:53:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 55.7 79.3 1063 11:54:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 55.9 81.4 1064 11:55:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 53.3 79.6 1065 11:56:00 00:01:00.0 67.3 52.4 77.2 1066 11:57:00 00:01:00.0 75.3 57.3 81.8 1067 11:58:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 55.7 78.5 1068 11:59:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 53.4 81.1 1069 12:00:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 47.1 78.4 1070 12:01:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 53.4 80.5 1071 12:02:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 48.8 81.7 1072 12:03:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 56.3 83.1 1073 12:04:00 00:01:00.0 69.6 52.6 80.7 1074 12:05:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 51.3 79.1 1075 12:06:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 59.4 80.4 1076 12:07:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 58.1 86.4 1077 12:08:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 49.5 80.4 1078 12:09:00 00:01:00.0 68.5 51.5 76.6 1079 12:10:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 54.3 83.5 1080 12:11:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 56.3 80.8 1081 12:12:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 49.4 81.0 1082 12:13:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 52.4 81.6 1083 12:14:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 52.0 77.7 1084 12:15:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 56.9 81.7 1085 12:16:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 52.4 78.7 1086 12:17:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 59.1 82.0 1087 12:18:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 52.6 81.8 1088 12:19:00 00:01:00.0 69.9 53.2 80.7 1089 12:20:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 54.3 79.5 1090 12:21:00 00:01:00.0 68.0 50.9 78.2 1091 12:22:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 55.4 84.5 1092 12:23:00 00:01:00.0 75.5 57.4 81.7 1093 12:24:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 56.6 74.5 1094 12:25:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 55.1 80.8 1095 12:26:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 53.6 80.8 1096 12:27:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 52.6 77.2 1097 12:28:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 51.4 83.5 1098 12:29:00 00:01:00.0 66.9 49.9 74.3 1099 12:30:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 52.8 79.8 1100 12:31:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 51.2 78.8 1101 12:32:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 51.8 82.5 1102 12:33:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 51.7 79.7 1103 12:34:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 53.6 82.7 1104 12:35:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 60.2 81.0 1105 12:36:00 00:01:00.0 63.5 53.5 69.8 1106 12:37:00 00:01:00.0 69.9 55.5 79.8 1107 12:38:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 55.4 81.2 1108 12:39:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 51.1 85.3 1109 12:40:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 51.1 82.5 1110 12:41:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 58.6 82.8 1111 12:42:00 00:01:00.0 68.0 50.6 76.3 1112 12:43:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 60.6 81.2 1113 12:44:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 54.7 82.5 1114 12:45:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 55.2 79.7 1115 12:46:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 54.3 79.9 1116 12:47:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 65.2 79.4 1117 12:48:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 54.9 76.5 1118 12:49:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 57.1 81.7 1119 12:50:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 55.7 79.5 1120 12:51:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 53.1 80.2 1121 12:52:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 59.0 79.5 1122 12:53:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 53.7 80.3 1123 12:54:00 00:01:00.0 68.3 48.1 76.5 1124 12:55:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 53.9 81.2 1125 12:56:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 52.6 80.5 1126 12:57:00 00:01:00.0 69.6 52.0 78.4 1127 12:58:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 52.4 80.7 1128 12:59:00 00:01:00.0 76.9 56.9 90.8 1129 13:00:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 52.4 81.1 1130 13:01:00 00:01:00.0 67.4 49.9 79.2 1131 13:02:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 55.1 81.9 1132 13:03:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 49.7 79.8 1133 13:04:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 49.7 79.4 1134 13:05:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 55.0 82.4 1135 13:06:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 52.0 79.9 1136 13:07:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 49.6 80.2 1137 13:08:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 51.9 78.9 1138 13:09:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 63.1 83.2 1139 13:10:00 00:01:00.0 68.1 55.3 76.9 1140 13:11:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 56.2 80.3 1141 13:12:00 00:01:00.0 76.6 52.3 86.2 1142 13:13:00 00:01:00.0 68.9 56.7 77.5 1143 13:14:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 52.7 79.6 1144 13:15:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 51.8 77.9 1145 13:16:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 51.5 80.1 1146 13:17:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 53.5 81.6 1147 13:18:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 53.5 81.1 1148 13:19:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 56.1 80.9 1149 13:20:00 00:01:00.0 68.8 56.7 79.0 1150 13:21:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 55.5 82.0 1151 13:22:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 50.4 80.8 1152 13:23:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 54.8 80.9 1153 13:24:00 00:01:00.0 67.1 47.4 78.8 1154 13:25:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 48.3 79.8 1155 13:26:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 52.0 81.0 1156 13:27:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 51.9 82.1 1157 13:28:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 51.3 84.7 1158 13:29:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 55.4 80.2 1159 13:30:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 55.0 81.6 1160 13:31:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 51.8 80.4 1161 13:32:00 00:01:00.0 78.8 59.6 88.7 1162 13:33:00 00:01:00.0 67.9 53.5 73.4 1163 13:34:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 51.7 83.6 1164 13:35:00 00:01:00.0 76.0 65.2 83.8 1165 13:36:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 52.1 79.8 1166 13:37:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 57.5 79.7 1167 13:38:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 52.6 83.8 1168 13:39:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 54.8 80.8 1169 13:40:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 51.6 81.1 1170 13:41:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 55.0 80.8 1171 13:42:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 53.1 79.7 1172 13:43:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 56.0 80.7 1173 13:44:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 55.6 81.9 1174 13:45:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 53.4 81.0 1175 13:46:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 54.5 81.6 1176 13:47:00 00:01:00.0 74.2 49.5 81.8 1177 13:48:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 48.1 82.8 1178 13:49:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 52.9 85.1 1179 13:50:00 00:01:00.0 65.4 52.7 76.5 1180 13:51:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 50.7 81.5 1181 13:52:00 00:01:00.0 75.1 53.9 82.0 1182 13:53:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 52.7 83.9 1183 13:54:00 00:01:00.0 70.1 53.2 81.0 1184 13:55:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 53.3 77.4 1185 13:56:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 60.6 84.0 1186 13:57:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 56.1 75.1 1187 13:58:00 00:01:00.0 75.3 52.9 82.9 1188 13:59:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 51.2 75.6 1189 14:00:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 52.3 79.7 1190 14:01:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 51.9 83.6 1191 14:02:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 51.5 78.6 1192 14:03:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 55.1 77.7 1193 14:04:00 00:01:00.0 74.9 56.9 84.1 1194 14:05:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 56.2 80.5 1195 14:06:00 00:01:00.0 69.1 55.6 74.9 1196 14:07:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 51.7 83.8 1197 14:08:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 54.3 78.1 1198 14:09:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 56.3 80.8 1199 14:10:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 54.8 81.4 1200 14:11:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 50.5 81.1 1201 14:12:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 57.9 80.5 1202 14:13:00 00:01:00.0 67.1 52.4 76.6 1203 14:14:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 62.7 82.6 1204 14:15:00 00:01:00.0 66.6 51.0 75.3 1205 14:16:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 55.7 78.7 1206 14:17:00 00:01:00.0 68.6 47.7 76.0 1207 14:18:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 51.2 77.4 1208 14:19:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 57.5 81.9 1209 14:20:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 58.8 80.2 1210 14:21:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 62.9 80.6 1211 14:22:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 60.1 78.7 1212 14:23:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 48.0 78.6 1213 14:24:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 50.8 79.7 1214 14:25:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 50.1 79.1 1215 14:26:00 00:01:00.0 75.1 52.7 82.3 1216 14:27:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 49.4 80.1 1217 14:28:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 59.8 81.6 1218 14:29:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 50.3 80.2 1219 14:30:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 50.5 82.2 1220 14:31:00 00:01:00.0 67.9 54.0 77.1 1221 14:32:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 57.9 81.0 1222 14:33:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 58.3 80.0 1223 14:34:00 00:01:00.0 69.0 59.0 75.9 1224 14:35:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 51.9 80.0 1225 14:36:00 00:01:00.0 68.8 51.0 77.9 1226 14:37:00 00:01:00.0 74.2 52.7 83.7 1227 14:38:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 55.8 81.2 1228 14:39:00 00:01:00.0 71.1 57.2 78.8 1229 14:40:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 63.3 81.5 1230 14:41:00 00:01:00.0 66.7 55.8 74.6 1231 14:42:00 00:01:00.0 75.7 65.2 81.5 1232 14:43:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 57.8 79.5 1233 14:44:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 63.1 82.5 1234 14:45:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 58.2 81.3 1235 14:46:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 55.4 78.2 1236 14:47:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 53.7 81.7 1237 14:48:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 53.4 83.4 1238 14:49:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 57.0 80.5 1239 14:50:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 59.8 80.7 1240 14:51:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 57.1 80.5 1241 14:52:00 00:01:00.0 68.7 53.6 76.6 1242 14:53:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 52.6 79.3 1243 14:54:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 57.1 80.1 1244 14:55:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 52.8 80.7 1245 14:56:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 58.8 79.4 1246 14:57:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 55.9 80.2 1247 14:58:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 56.9 76.5 1248 14:59:00 00:01:00.0 74.9 60.8 81.4 1249 15:00:00 00:01:00.0 64.4 50.1 76.9 1250 15:01:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 61.9 84.2 1251 15:02:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 55.1 79.8 1252 15:03:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 58.4 82.1 1253 15:04:00 00:01:00.0 75.4 53.6 84.3 1254 15:05:00 00:01:00.0 74.8 64.7 84.7 1255 15:06:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 60.2 82.5 1256 15:07:00 00:01:00.0 75.6 61.4 81.4 1257 15:08:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 61.4 77.2 1258 15:09:00 00:01:00.0 75.5 58.8 84.1 1259 15:10:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 57.3 77.8 1260 15:11:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 57.4 78.2 1261 15:12:00 00:01:00.0 75.9 55.6 82.3 1262 15:13:00 00:01:00.0 70.3 58.0 75.6 1263 15:14:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 54.9 80.3 1264 15:15:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 60.0 82.2 1265 15:16:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 61.3 80.9 1266 15:17:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 56.9 81.0 1267 15:18:00 00:01:00.0 73.1 55.5 82.4 1268 15:19:00 00:01:00.0 75.8 56.0 82.8 1269 15:20:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 52.9 81.1 1270 15:21:00 00:01:00.0 70.9 52.8 79.3 1271 15:22:00 00:01:00.0 75.8 63.6 81.3 1272 15:23:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 56.6 79.8 1273 15:24:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 56.8 82.3 1274 15:25:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 57.6 80.7 1275 15:26:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 55.9 81.5 1276 15:27:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 53.5 79.6 1277 15:28:00 00:01:00.0 77.3 53.4 87.4 1278 15:29:00 00:01:00.0 69.2 53.6 80.0 1279 15:30:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 54.5 82.1 1280 15:31:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 54.8 78.0 1281 15:32:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 54.1 83.5 1282 15:33:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 55.0 80.6 1283 15:34:00 00:01:00.0 65.3 52.0 73.1 1284 15:35:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 57.0 82.8 1285 15:36:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 54.4 80.8 1286 15:37:00 00:01:00.0 75.6 62.8 81.1 1287 15:38:00 00:01:00.0 74.2 52.6 85.0 1288 15:39:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 54.3 81.4 1289 15:40:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 53.8 82.8 1290 15:41:00 00:01:00.0 70.5 54.4 80.1 1291 15:42:00 00:01:00.0 74.9 54.7 81.4 1292 15:43:00 00:01:00.0 69.4 53.7 79.4 1293 15:44:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 54.0 81.6 1294 15:45:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 60.0 80.1 1295 15:46:00 00:01:00.0 72.2 53.5 78.6 1296 15:47:00 00:01:00.0 76.5 57.8 84.5 1297 15:48:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 54.4 77.7 1298 15:49:00 00:01:00.0 75.0 59.2 82.6 1299 15:50:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 59.1 80.8 1300 15:51:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 54.2 82.5 1301 15:52:00 00:01:00.0 75.1 54.5 83.3 1302 15:53:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 53.5 81.3 1303 15:54:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 66.0 82.3 1304 15:55:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 55.3 81.1 1305 15:56:00 00:01:00.0 76.4 62.0 87.5 1306 15:57:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 57.0 80.7 1307 15:58:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 51.6 81.4 1308 15:59:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 55.6 82.1 1309 16:00:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 55.4 79.9 1310 16:01:00 00:01:00.0 74.2 52.7 81.8 1311 16:02:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 52.7 81.2 1312 16:03:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 55.1 81.7 1313 16:04:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 54.6 83.6 1314 16:05:00 00:01:00.0 77.1 57.1 85.7 1315 16:06:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 54.9 81.5 1316 16:07:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 55.7 79.2 1317 16:08:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 58.7 81.0 1318 16:09:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 55.4 88.1 1319 16:10:00 00:01:00.0 77.7 61.1 88.1 1320 16:11:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 57.9 77.7 1321 16:12:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 54.9 81.5 1322 16:13:00 00:01:00.0 72.1 55.7 82.0 1323 16:14:00 00:01:00.0 76.0 53.5 83.8 1324 16:15:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 52.0 80.4 1325 16:16:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 58.2 81.1 1326 16:17:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 62.6 81.4 1327 16:18:00 00:01:00.0 74.8 59.9 83.1 1328 16:19:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 59.3 81.0 1329 16:20:00 00:01:00.0 67.8 56.4 76.2 1330 16:21:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 54.5 86.0 1331 16:22:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 59.9 80.0 1332 16:23:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 57.2 83.7 1333 16:24:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 58.1 82.2 1334 16:25:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 54.7 82.7 1335 16:26:00 00:01:00.0 75.6 56.0 81.7 1336 16:27:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 55.1 81.4 1337 16:28:00 00:01:00.0 76.6 59.4 82.5 1338 16:29:00 00:01:00.0 66.8 52.9 72.4 1339 16:30:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 55.3 79.9 1340 16:31:00 00:01:00.0 75.4 57.8 82.3 1341 16:32:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 53.4 80.8 1342 16:33:00 00:01:00.0 76.3 57.8 84.7 1343 16:34:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 60.8 79.2 1344 16:35:00 00:01:00.0 75.7 65.7 81.6 1345 16:36:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 60.3 79.1 1346 16:37:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 61.5 81.5 1347 16:38:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 61.3 82.5 1348 16:39:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 56.4 78.1 1349 16:40:00 00:01:00.0 75.6 65.8 84.3 1350 16:41:00 00:01:00.0 69.6 57.5 76.1 1351 16:42:00 00:01:00.0 75.7 60.1 84.5 1352 16:43:00 00:01:00.0 77.5 56.5 83.6 1353 16:44:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 54.1 83.0 1354 16:45:00 00:01:00.0 79.4 65.7 89.1 1355 16:46:00 00:01:00.0 74.8 60.7 80.7 1356 16:47:00 00:01:00.0 76.4 60.1 82.8 1357 16:48:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 54.0 78.8 1358 16:49:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 59.7 80.9 1359 16:50:00 00:01:00.0 76.3 62.7 82.8 1360 16:51:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 56.4 82.0 1361 16:52:00 00:01:00.0 76.1 61.7 80.4 1362 16:53:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 52.5 79.2 1363 16:54:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 53.7 80.0 1364 16:55:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 61.5 79.8 1365 16:56:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 56.8 80.4 1366 16:57:00 00:01:00.0 78.2 58.6 86.3 1367 16:58:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 53.1 79.5 1368 16:59:00 00:01:00.0 74.2 52.6 79.3 1369 17:00:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 53.4 80.0 1370 17:01:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 55.9 82.8 1371 17:02:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 56.3 80.1 1372 17:03:00 00:01:00.0 75.3 62.5 85.2 1373 17:04:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 53.5 82.3 1374 17:05:00 00:01:00.0 72.6 54.6 80.5 1375 17:06:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 50.3 81.4 1376 17:07:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 52.2 82.5 1377 17:08:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 52.6 81.0 1378 17:09:00 00:01:00.0 71.4 51.0 79.9 1379 17:10:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 56.7 80.3 1380 17:11:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 49.9 79.3 1381 17:12:00 00:01:00.0 75.8 54.5 81.4 1382 17:13:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 65.3 77.3 1383 17:14:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 53.3 79.9 1384 17:15:00 00:01:00.0 75.6 53.8 80.0 1385 17:16:00 00:01:00.0 71.3 58.4 77.4 1386 17:17:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 57.3 78.0 1387 17:18:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 57.9 75.9 1388 17:19:00 00:01:00.0 77.7 57.1 90.3 1389 17:20:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 63.3 81.9 1390 17:21:00 00:01:00.0 66.7 56.3 74.8 1391 17:22:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 59.1 77.6 1392 17:23:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 57.8 81.4 1393 17:24:00 00:01:00.0 72.5 56.6 78.3 1394 17:25:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 65.8 81.6 1395 17:26:00 00:01:00.0 70.2 55.1 78.4 1396 17:27:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 62.8 79.7 1397 17:28:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 62.4 79.7 1398 17:29:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 53.3 79.5 1399 17:30:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 56.0 80.3 1400 17:31:00 00:01:00.0 77.5 59.9 85.4 1401 17:32:00 00:01:00.0 72.7 56.7 77.7 1402 17:33:00 00:01:00.0 75.4 58.2 81.2 1403 17:34:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 55.5 82.1 1404 17:35:00 00:01:00.0 75.6 53.4 83.6 1405 17:36:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 51.3 84.9 1406 17:37:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 54.0 82.0 1407 17:38:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 54.0 81.8 1408 17:39:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 53.8 80.9 1409 17:40:00 00:01:00.0 75.3 64.3 81.0 1410 17:41:00 00:01:00.0 72.3 61.7 78.4 1411 17:42:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 57.9 82.9 1412 17:43:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 59.1 79.6 1413 17:44:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 55.9 81.9 1414 17:45:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 61.2 80.4 1415 17:46:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 57.3 82.9 1416 17:47:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 56.2 80.3 1417 17:48:00 00:01:00.0 73.3 63.1 81.7 1418 17:49:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 60.3 80.2 1419 17:50:00 00:01:00.0 80.2 56.4 90.2 1420 17:51:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 61.7 82.9 1421 17:52:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 61.8 80.9 1422 17:53:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 58.0 77.3 1423 17:54:00 00:01:00.0 73.9 56.8 83.1 1424 17:55:00 00:01:00.0 77.1 53.9 85.9 1425 17:56:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 52.7 82.3 1426 17:57:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 59.6 82.3 1427 17:58:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 54.5 80.4 1428 17:59:00 00:01:00.0 73.4 60.6 79.6 1429 18:00:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 57.9 77.7 1430 18:01:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 57.2 79.9 1431 18:02:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 59.3 80.9 1432 18:03:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 53.6 79.3 1433 18:04:00 00:01:00.0 73.7 53.3 77.9 1434 18:05:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 56.6 79.3 1435 18:06:00 00:01:00.0 74.2 60.9 80.2 1436 18:07:00 00:01:00.0 71.7 55.4 79.8 1437 18:08:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 56.3 77.8 1438 18:09:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 58.4 78.8 1439 18:10:00 00:01:00.0 75.2 66.5 80.7 1440 18:11:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 56.8 79.3 1441 18:12:00 00:01:00.0 74.5 59.0 83.7 1442 18:13:00 00:01:00.0 74.6 67.6 80.4 1443 18:14:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 55.3 79.5 1444 18:15:00 00:01:00.0 76.6 55.4 86.3 1445 18:16:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 58.5 79.5 1446 18:17:00 00:01:00.0 73.8 58.2 82.4 1447 18:18:00 00:01:00.0 71.6 53.4 80.8 1448 18:19:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 53.3 80.1 1449 18:20:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 56.3 83.2 1450 18:21:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 59.6 79.4 1451 18:22:00 00:01:00.0 70.0 57.1 76.7 1452 18:23:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 54.9 80.7 1453 18:24:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 52.8 77.4 1454 18:25:00 00:01:00.0 71.8 55.1 80.8 15 18:26:00 00:01:00.0 70.8 56.3 78.5 16 18:27:00 00:01:00.0 75.1 59.3 83.0 17 18:28:00 00:01:00.0 69.7 57.8 76.9 18 18:29:00 00:01:00.0 74.7 63.4 83.7 19 18:30:00 00:01:00.0 68.9 51.9 77.9 20 18:31:00 00:01:00.0 73.0 54.5 80.8 21 18:32:00 00:01:00.0 66.3 52.5 75.6 22 18:33:00 00:01:00.0 74.9 53.7 84.8 23 18:34:00 00:01:00.0 72.9 57.5 80.3 24 18:35:00 00:01:00.0 72.0 55.7 83.2 25 18:36:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 53.0 80.8 26 18:37:00 00:01:00.0 69.8 56.8 77.3 27 18:38:00 00:01:00.0 74.0 60.9 84.6 28 18:39:00 00:01:00.0 71.0 59.8 79.3 29 18:40:00 00:01:00.0 73.5 57.1 80.3 30 18:41:00 00:01:00.0 74.3 54.5 88.4 31 18:42:00 00:01:00.0 72.8 55.3 80.5 32 18:43:00 00:01:00.0 69.3 53.5 80.0 33 18:44:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 55.4 81.7 34 18:45:00 00:01:00.0 71.5 55.8 78.0 35 18:46:00 00:01:00.0 74.4 57.3 80.3 36 18:47:00 00:01:00.0 70.4 54.0 81.6 37 18:48:00 00:01:00.0 71.2 55.1 81.4 38 18:49:00 00:01:00.0 60.8 53.9 70.8 39 18:50:00 00:01:00.0 73.6 53.0 82.3 40 18:51:00 00:01:00.0 70.7 53.4 79.4 41 18:52:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 56.2 82.2 42 18:53:00 00:01:00.0 74.1 56.5 81.0 43 18:54:00 00:01:00.0 66.5 54.2 74.6 44 18:55:00 00:01:00.0 65.6 54.5 75.4 45 18:56:00 00:01:00.0 73.2 55.4 83.4 46 18:57:00 00:01:00.0 70.6 55.6 81.1 47 18:58:00 00:01:00.0 67.2 58.1 76.9 48 18:59:00 00:01:00.0 72.4 55.2 81.3 Construction Generated Noise Building Type Domestic Housing Distance (ft) Construction Noise at 50 Feet (dBA Leq)50 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 83 83 Excavation 88 75 Foundation Construction 81 81 Building Construction 81 65 Finishing and Site Cleanup 88 72 Maximum Construction Noise (dBA Leq)10 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 97 97 Excavation (Site Preparation)102 89 Foundation Construction 95 95 Building Construction 95 79 Paving 102 86 Average Construction Noise (dBA Leq)130 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 75 75 Excavation (Site Preparation)80 67 Foundation Construction 73 73 Building Construction 73 57 Paving 80 64 Maximum Construction Noise (dBA Leq)170 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 72 72 Excavation (Site Preparation)77 64 Foundation Construction 70 70 Building Construction 70 54 Paving 77 61 Average Construction Noise (dBA Leq)380 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 65 65 Excavation (Site Preparation)70 57 Foundation Construction 63 63 Building Construction 63 47 Paving 70 54 Maximum Construction Noise (dBA Leq)60 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 81 81 Excavation (Site Preparation)86 73 Foundation Construction 79 79 Building Construction 79 63 Paving 86 70 Average Construction Noise (dBA Leq)190 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 71 71 Excavation (Site Preparation)76 63 Foundation Construction 69 69 Building Construction 69 53 Paving 76 60 Maximum Construction Noise (dBA Leq)10 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 97 97 Excavation (Site Preparation)102 89 Foundation Construction 95 95 Building Construction 95 79 Paving 102 86 Average Construction Noise (dBA Leq)240 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 69 69 Excavation (Site Preparation)74 61 Foundation Construction 67 67 Building Construction 67 51 Paving 74 58 Shaffer Park to the South of the Project Site Source: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, "Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances," prepared for the USEPA, December 31, 1971. Based on analysis for Office Building, Hotel, Hospital, School, and Public Works. Residential Use to the East of the Project Site Residential Use to the North of the Project Site Industrial Use to the West of the Project Site Construction Generated Vibration Residential Use to the North of the Project Site Closest Distance (feet): 10 Approximate RMS a Approximate RMS Velocity at 25 ft, Velocity Level, Equipment inch/second inch/second Vibratory roller 0.21 0.830 Caisson Drill 0.089 0.352 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.352 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.012 Jackhammer 0.035 0.138 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.300 Criteria 0.040 Industrial Use to the West of the Project Site Closest Distance (feet): 170 Approximate RMS a Approximate RMS Velocity at 25 ft, Velocity Level, Equipment inch/second inch/second Vibratory roller 0.21 0.012 Caisson Drill 0.089 0.005 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.005 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.000 Jackhammer 0.035 0.002 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.004 Criteria 0.040 Shaffer Park to the South of the Project Site Closest Distance (feet): 60 Approximate RMS a Approximate RMS Velocity at 25 ft, Velocity Level, Equipment inch/second inch/second Vibratory roller 0.21 0.056 Caisson Drill 0.089 0.024 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.024 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.001 Jackhammer 0.035 0.009 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.020 Criteria 0.040 Residential Use to the East of the Project Site Closest Distance (feet): 10 Approximate RMS a Approximate RMS Velocity at 25 ft, Velocity Level, Equipment inch/second inch/second Vibratory roller 0.21 0.830 Caisson Drill 0.089 0.352 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.352 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.012 Jackhammer 0.035 0.138 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.300 Criteria 0.040 Based on distance to nearest structure 1. Determined based on use of jackhammers or pneumatic hammers that may be used for pavement demolition at a distance of 25 feet Notes: RMS velocity calculated from vibration level (VdB) using the reference of one microinch/second. Source: Based on methodology from the United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2006). APPENDIX G TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM To: David Cohen Cohen Living Trust From: Darlene Danehy Yellowhair, T.E, PTOE, RSP Date: June 5, 2020 Subject: Cohen Property, City of Orange Traffic Memorandum INTRODUCTION The Cohen Property is expected to include 32 single family residential units, which is consistent with the City of Orange General Plan for the site. The project will be replacing two buildings which currently support a variety of commercial uses, a K-8 school serving homeless students, and a restaurant. The City of Orange requires a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for a proposed project that meets any of the following criteria: · When either the AM or PM peak hour trip generation is expected to exceed 100 vehicle trips from the proposed development · Projects on the Arterial Highway System which generate 1,600 Average Daily Trips (ADT) · Projects that will add 51 or more trips during either the AM or PM peak hours to any intersection · Any project where variations from the standards and guidelines provided in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines are being proposed. It is expected that the project will generate far fewer than 100 peak hour trips; therefore, a full traffic impact study is not required. However, this memorandum provides information about the estimated trip generation and distribution for the project for reference and addresses construction traffic. The project site plan is included as an attachment to this memorandum. TRIP GENERATION The new trips to be generated by this project were estimated using the 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual and are shown in Table 1. As seen in the table, the project is expected to generate 302 trips per day, including 24 trips in the AM peak hour and 32 trips in the PM peak hour. There are multiple existing uses on site which will be replaced with the project, including a K-8 school which serves homeless children, a fast casual restaurant (with dine-in and take-out services), and partially occupied retail spaces. David Cohen Page 2 of 4 June 5, 2020 2 Because the number of trips currently generated by the site is likely to be lower than what would be calculated with the ITE trip generation rates, it is assumed for this memorandum that the site is currently unoccupied. Further, this provides a conservative assumption because the project will actually be replacing trips instead of generating completely new trips on the site. Table 1. Project Trip Generation TRIP DISTRIBUTION Although the project is expected to add a minimal amount of traffic to the network, the trip distribution was estimated to help visualize where traffic generated by the project may travel. The site will be served by a single driveway located on Grove Avenue. The intersection of Grove Avenue and Orange Olive Road provides access to the north and south; however, based on conversations with the City, it was assumed that all traffic wishing to travel south from the project would turn left onto Grove Avenue, then would travel south on Shaffer Street to access the signalized intersection at Taft Avenue. This is a conservative assumption, as it is likely that some or all of the site traffic wishing to travel south would make the left turn directly onto Orange Olive Road. Figure 1 shows the anticipated trip distribution out of and into the site and the projected AM peak hour, PM peak hour, and daily trips expected to make each movement. As shown in the figure, most of the site traffic is expected to use Grove Avenue and Orange Olive Road to travel to and/or from the site. Although this memorandum includes the conservative assumption that 40% of traffic exiting the site will travel along Shaffer Street, that results in only 7 vehicles in the peak hour along that roadway. Further, Shaffer Street between Grove Avenue and Taft Avenue includes one stop sign for southbound traffic immediately south of Grove Avenue and three speed humps, both of which will help deter cut-through traffic. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) Per the 2018 CEQA Statute and Guidelines, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is “the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts.” The City has a screening tool to determine if a project can be screened out from further VMT analysis. One of the criteria states that if the project is within a low VMT generating zone, the project would not be required to conduct further VMT analysis. In addition, a secondary criterion for projects within low VMT generating zones is that it should be confirmed that the project is consistent with the existing land use within the Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ). This project is in a low VMT generating zone and is consistent with the TAZ, so no further VMT analysis is required. The screening results are included as an attachment to this memorandum. Units 32 Period Trips/Unit Trips % In % Out Trips In Trips Out AM Peak 0.74 24 25% 75% 6 18 PM Peak 0.99 32 63% 37% 20 12 Daily 9.44 302 50% 50% 151 151 ITE LU 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing David Cohen Page 3 of 4 June 5, 2020 3 Figure 1. Trip Distribution CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC Because of the size of the project, construction traffic is not expected to create any significant impacts. However, construction traffic (particularly heavy trucks) should access the site either directly from Orange Olive Road or via Grove Avenue from Orange Olive Road. No construction traffic should travel along Shaffer Street within the residential area immediately east of the project site. Attachments: Site Plan VMT Screening Results David Cohen June 5, 2020 Attachments Site Plan VMT Screening Results (06/03/2020 RMB) R:\Projects\CLT\010100\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Site_Plan.pdfD:\Projects\3CLT\010100\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Site_Plan_20200122.aiSource: KTGY Architecture + Planning, June 2020Exhibit 3-1Cohen Property Conceptual Site Plan Project Information Project Trips and VMT Information Project Name Opening Year 2021 VMT Methodology Origin Destination (OD) Parcel Number ( OCTAM TAZ#432 ) Daily Trips: 206 Average Trip Length: 7.5 Service Population: 48 Screening Criteria for Orange Is the project location in a Transit Priority Area?No Project VMT Thresholds Comparison Is the project location in a low VMT generating zone?Yes OPR Guidance (15% Below Existing) Is the Project one of these land use types?No GHG Reduction Targets (14.3% Below Existing) (show land use types)Below Existing Does the project generate fewer than 110 daily trips?No Better than General Plan Buildout (enter project land use in the section below) The Project can be considered for screening from additional analysis. Please refer to the ‘secondary screening checks’ table in the User Guide. Project Land Use Information Unit Residential : Single Family Homes 32 Dwelling Units Residential : MultiFamily Homes 0 Dwelling Units Existing VMT per service populationProject VMT per service populationChart Min31.5 32.3 20.0 Office 0.000 1,000 Square Feet VMT per service populationCheckboxes Retail 0.000 1,000 Square Feet FALSE OPR Guidance 26.8 26.8 26.8 26.8FALSEGHG Reduction Targets (14.3% Below Existing)27 27 27 27 Industrial 0.000 1,000 Square Feet FALSE Below Existing 31.5 31.5 31.5 31.5TRUEMaximum Achievable Reduction 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 Private School 0 Students University 0 Students Entertainment 0.000 1,000 Square Feet Hotel 0 Rooms 374-431-17 Orange-Olive/Grove Residential Project 31.5 32.3 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Existing VMT per service population Project VMT per service population North Orange County Collaborative VMT Traffic Study Screening Tool VMT per service population 32.3 30.9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 VMT Comparison GPB NOCC+ APPENDIX H FIRE FLOW STUDY FIRE FLOW STUDY For: Orange-Olive Ave and Grove Ave 305 Grove Prepared for: City of Orange Fire Department Owner/Developer/Contractor: Cohen Living Trust Prepared by: DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 S. Old Springs Road, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 (714) 685-6860 February 6, 2019 DRC Job Number: 18-860 FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS Orange-Olive and Grove 18-860 Fire Flow Report.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: PURPOSE OF REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FIRE FLOW METHODOLOGY SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION SECTION 2: EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TEST RESULTS SECTION 3: FIRE FLOW SCENARIO MAP PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANT FLOW CALCULATIONS SECTION 4: BACKFLOW DEVICE PRESSURE LOSS TABLE FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS Orange-Olive and Grove 18-860 Fire Flow Report.doc Purpose of Report This Fire Flow Calculations Report has been prepared to evaluate the proposed private water system for use of providing the required fire hydrant flow and pressure for the proposed residential on Orange-Olive and Grove Avenue. Project Description Fire service for three proposed fire hydrants will be connected to a proposed 8” iron service off of the public main that serves a portion of Grove Avenue. The proposed service was modeled with an 8” Zurn-Wilkins 350DA double check detector assembly that feeds the proposed 8” PVC fire main onsite. Fire Flow and Daily Flow Methodology Hydraulic calculations were done using the Hazen Williams method for determining pressure loss in pipe flow. Computations were prepared using Haestad Methods, WaterCAD program, Version 8. Minor loss values for fittings and pipe material friction losses were based upon typical values and are shown for each pipe run in the pipe report tables in the calculation section. The pressure losses due to the backflow device at the connection to the public main were calculated based upon manufacturer specifications shown in Section 4. Modeling the performance of the existing off-site public water system was accomplished by designating a 3-point pump curve that has properties based upon a fire hydrant test done adjacent to the connection point by Provo Engineering. The static pressure, residual pressure, and predicted flow rate at 20 psi are derived from the fire flow results. DRC modeled the water system by setting Pipe Elements and Junction Nodes to describe the existing and proposed water system. Junction Nodes were set at the location of each connection point or change in pipe material or size. The flow characteristics at the source were modeled by placing a reservoir at the test location. A pump was then placed at the reservoir to model the flow data taken from the field at the source point. Each proposed hydrant was flowed at 2,000 gpm to stimulate a worst- case scenario and the backflow device was modeled to yield a 6 psi pressure loss at 2,000 gpm per product specifications that can be seen in Section 4. See the fire flow calculations for a graphical layout of the fire system. Summary & Conclusion Fire Appurtenance Flow Rate Demand (gpm) Pressure (psi) Fire Hydrant J-3 FH 2,000 65 Based upon the hydrant flow test results with proposed 8” PVC main servicing each appurtenance, the system is capable of delivering the demand flow at more than 20 psi. Therefore, our fire water system is sufficiently sized to meet the flow/pressure requirements set by the fire department. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS Orange-Olive and Grove 18-860 Fire Flow Report.doc EXISTING WATER LINE FLOW CALCULATIONS Provo Engineering 714-393-3877 *** 714-261-5716 Hydrant Flow Test Report Project Commercial development at 305 E Grove Test date 2/5/19 Address 305 E. Grove Ave Test time 09:45 City Orange State CA File no. Test hydrant location Hydrant on the northeast corner of Orange Olive Rd & Grove Ave G7-4267 Elev (ft +/-)Grade Flow hydrant location Second hydrant north of Grove Ave on east side of Orange Olive Rd G7-4852 Elev (ft +/-)Grade Static Pressure 76 PSI Report Date 2/5/19 Outlet C-value Diam Volume A 0.9 2.0 0 PSI 0 GPM B 0.9 2.5 40 PSI 1061 GPM C 0.9 3.0 0 PSI 0 GPM D 0.83 4.0 0 PSI 0 GPM Residual Pressure 71 PSI at an observed volume of 1061 GPM Projected Pressure 20 PSI calculates to a volume of 3912 GPM Although the results are accurate for the date and time given, they may not accurately reflect higher or lower readings which vary due to seasonal conditions and time of day. Symbols =Test hydrant Test by:=Flow hydrant Witness Fire Safety Specialist City of Orange Fire Dept Client DRC Engineering, Inc. 160 S Old Springs Rd, Suite 210 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 cc: 22931 Savi Ranch Pkwy, Yorba Linda, CA 92887 email: info@provoengineering.com Hydr # Hydr # Pitot Per NFPA 24-10, Table C.4.10.1(a), note 1, Q=29.84 x c(d)2 (p)0.5 Per NFPA 24-10, Paragraph C.4.10.1.2, Qr = Qf x (hr/hf)0.54 George Provencher Robert Desimone Michael Brhel rdesimone@cityoforange.org mbrhel@drc-eng.com cmack@drc-eng.com jfelton@cityoforange.org North F T T F FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS Orange-Olive and Grove 18-860 Fire Flow Report.doc FIRE FLOW CALCULATION RESULTS AND DIAGRAM Scenario: BasePage 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-16662/6/2019Bentley WaterCAD CONNECT Edition[10.00.00.49]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterOn Site Flow Report Updated.wtg FlexTable: Junction Table Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Demand (gpm) Elevation (ft) LabelID 75172.3100.00J-2 FH35 75172.3100.00J-237 76175.2200.00J-139 72166.5900.00J-341 76175.2200.00J-446 76175.2200.00J-4 FH48 65149.202,0000.00J-3 FH56 Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2/7/2019 Bentley WaterCAD CONNECT Edition [10.00.00.49] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterOn Site Flow Report Updated.wtg FlexTable: Pipe TableHeadloss Gradient(ft/ft)Velocity(ft/s)Flow(gpm)Minor Loss Coefficient (Local)Hazen-Williams CMaterialDiameter(in)LabelStop NodeStart NodeLength (Scaled)(ft)0.0000.23-2,0006.900130.0Ductile Iron60.0P-1R-1PMP-1250.09612.77-2,0002.020150.0PVC8.0P-2PMP-1J-11120.05112.77-2,0000.000150.0PVC8.0P-3J-1J-2580.05112.772,0000.000150.0PVC8.0P-4J-3J-21130.0000.0000.000150.0PVC8.0P-5J-4J-1810.0000.0001.670150.0PVC6.0P-6J-2J-2 FH190.88522.69-2,0001.670150.0PVC6.0P-7J-3J-3 FH200.0000.0001.670150.0PVC6.0P-8J-4 FHJ-419Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-16662/7/2019Bentley WaterCAD CONNECT Edition[10.00.00.49]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterOn Site Flow Report Updated.wtg FlexTable: Pump TablePump Head(ft)Flow (Total)(gpm)Hydraulic Grade (Discharge)(ft)Hydraulic Grade (Suction)(ft)Status (Initial)Pump DefinitionElevation(ft)LabelID10.202,000185.99175.79OnPublic Hydrant Results0.00PMP-130Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-16662/7/2019Bentley WaterCAD CONNECT Edition[10.00.00.49]Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterOn Site Flow Report Updated.wtg FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS Orange-Olive and Grove 18-860 Fire Flow Report.doc BACKFLOW DEVICE FLOW CHARACTERISTICS Zurn Industries, LLC | Wilkins 1747 Commerce Way, Paso Robles, CA U.S.A. 93446 Ph. 855-663-9876, Fax 805-238-5766 In Canada | Zurn Industries Limited 3544 Nashua Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1L2 Ph. 905-405-8272, Fax 905-405-1292 www.zurn.com Rev. H Date: 1/17 Document No. BF-350DA Patent No. 5, 913, 331 Product No. Model 350DA Model 350DA Double Check Detector Assembly Page 1 of 2 MODEL 350DAG SHOWN ABOVE E FD E B A FDCB A Options (Suf xes can be combined) - with OS & Y gate valves (standard) L - less shut-off valves (flanged body connections) LM - less water meter - with remote reading meter - with gallon meter (standard) CFM - with cu ft meter CMM - with cu meter meter G - with groove end gate valves FG - with flanged inlet connection and grooved outlet connection PI - with Post Indicator Gate Valve GF - with flanged inlet connection and grooved outlet connection BG - with grooved end butterfly valves with integral monitor switches (2 1/2" - 10") –509 - with AWWA C509 gate valves Accessories Repair kit (rubber only) Thermal expansion tank (Model XT) OS & Y Gate valve tamper switch (OSY-40) Attention: Model 350DA (flange body) and Model 350ADA (grooved body) have different lay lengths. Application Designed for installation on water lines in fire protection systems to protect against both backsiphonage and backpressure of polluted water into the potable water supply. Model 350DA shall provide protection where a potential health hazard does not exist. Incorporates metered by-pass to detect leaks and unauthorized water use. Standards Compliance (Sizes 2 1/2" - 10" Horiz. & Vert.) (12" Horizontal Only) • ASSE® Listed 1048 (Sizes 2 1/2" thru 12") • CSA® Certified B64.5 (Sizes 2 1/2" thru 8", & 12") • AWWA Compliant C510 (Sizes 2 1/2" thru 12"), and C550 • UL® Classified (Sizes 2 1/2" thru 12") • C-UL® Classified (Sizes 2 1/2" thru 12") • FM® Approved (Sizes 2 1/2" thru 10") • NYC MEA 147-99-M Vol 4 (2-1/2" - 10) • Approved by the Foundation for Cross Connection Control and Hydraulic Research at the University of Southern California (Sizes 2 1/2" thru 12") • Meets the requirements of NSF/ANSI 61* *(0.25% MAX. WEIGHTED AVERAGE LEAD CONTENT) By-Pass Back ow Assembly 3/4" Model 950XLD Materials Main valve body Ductile Iron ASTM A 536 Access covers Ductile Iron ASTM A 536 Coatings NSF Approved fusion epoxy finish Internals Stainless steel, 300 Series NORYL™ Fasteners Stainless Steel, 300 Series Elastomers EPDM (FDA approved) Buna Nitrile (FDA approved) Polymers NORYL™ Springs Stainless Steel, 300 Series Features Sizes: 2 1/2", 3", 4", 6", 8", 10", 12" Maximum working water pressure 175 PSI Maximum working water temperature 140°F Hydrostatic test pressure 350 PSI End connections (Grooved for steel) AWWA C606 (Flanged) ANSI B16.1 Class 125 Dimensions & Weights (do not include pkg.) NSF/ANSI 61 ഌFlow Characteristics Zurn Industries, LLC | Wilkins 1747 Commerce Way, Paso Robles, CA U.S.A. 93446 Ph. 855-663-9876, Fax 805-238-5766 In Canada | Zurn Industries Limited 3544 Nashua Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1L2 Ph. 905-405-8272, Fax 905-405-1292 www.zurn.com Page 2 of 2 Typical Installation Local codes shall govern installation requirements. Unless otherwise specified, the assembly shall be mounted at a minimum of 12" (305mm) and a maximum of 30" (762mm) above adequate drains with sufficient side clearance for test- ing and maintenance. The installation shall be made so that no part of the unit can be submerged. Speci cations The Double Check Detector Backflow Prevention Assembly shall be certified to NSF/ANSI 61, ASSE® Listed 1048, and supplied with full port gate valves. The main body and access cover shall be epoxy coated ductile iron (ASTM A 536), the seat ring and check valve shall be Noryl™, the stem shall be stainless steel (ASTM A 276) and the seat disc elastomers shall be EPDM. The first and second check valves shall be accessible for maintenance without removing the device from the line. The Double Check Detector Backflow Prevention Assembly shall be a ZURN WILKINS Model 350DA. OUTDOOR INSTALLATION VERTICAL INSTALLATION PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE 12" MIN. 30" MAX. DIRECTION OF FLOWDIRECTION OF FLOW COHENPROPERTYArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26SCHEMATIC SETORANGE,CAATTACHMENT NO. 5DRC NO. 4969-19; COHEN RESIDENTIAL PREOJECTSUBMITTED PLANS (DATE STAMPED 08/21/20)Sept. 19, 2020 DRC Meeting Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26SHEET INDEXA0.1CLUSTER PLAN FLOOR PLANS - FIRST FLOORCLUSTER PLAN FLOOR PLANS - SECOND FLOORCOLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD SCHEME 1-3COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD SCHEME 4-6COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD SCHEME 7-9COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD SCHEME 10-12SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLANSCHEMATIC ENLARGEMENT PLANSCHEMATIC WALL & FENCE PLANSCHEMATIC PLANTING PLANSCHEMATIC PRELIMINARY IRRIGATION HYDROZONEPLANSCHEMATIC LIGHTING PLANSCHEMATIC OPEN SPACE PLANCONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANCONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLANEXISTING SITEFIRE MASTER PLANSITE PLANTENTATIVECONCEPTUAL DESIGNCONCEPTUAL DESIGNCONCEPTUAL DESIGNSHEET INDEXARCHITECTURECOVER SHEETSHEET INDEXARCHITECTURAL PLOT EXHIBITARCHITECTURAL OPEN SPACE SITE PLAN*PER LANDSCAPEPERSPECTIVE AT PARKPERSPECTIVE IN CLUSTERPERSPECTIVE ON CORNER ORANGE OLIVE & E. GROVEPERSPECTIVE ENTRY OFF OF E. GROVESTREET SCENE ON E. GROVE AVE.STREET SCENE ON INTERNAL STREETSTREET SCENE ON ORANGE OLIVEPLAN 1 PERSPECTIVESPLAN 1 FRONT ELEVATIONSPLAN 1A- MODERN SPANISH ELEVATIONSPLAN 1AX - MODERN SPANISH ELEVATIONSPLAN 1B - IRVING GILL INSPIRED ELEVATIONSPLAN 1BX - IRVING GILL INSPIRED MODERN ELEVATIONSPLAN 1C - WRIGHTIAN ELEVATIONSPLAN 1CX - WRIGHTIAN ELEVATIONSPLAN 1D - CONTEMPORARY MODERN ELEVATIONSPLAN 1DX - CONTEMPORARY MODERN ELEVATIONSPLAN 1 FLOOR PLANSPLAN 1X FLOOR PLANSPLAN 2 PERSPECTIVESPLAN 2 FRONT ELEVATIONSPLAN 2A- MODERN SPANISH ELEVATIONSPLAN 2B - IRVING GILL INSPIRED ELEVATIONSPLAN 2C - WRIGHTIAN ELEVATIONSPLAN 2D - CONTEMPORARY MODERN ELEVATIONSPLAN 2 FLOOR PLANSPLAN 3 PERSPECTIVESPLAN 3 FRONT ELEVATIONSPLAN 3B - IRVING GILL INSPIRED ELEVATIONSPLAN 3C - WRIGHTIAN ELEVATIONSPLAN 3D - CONTEMPORARY MODERN ELEVATIONSPLAN 3 FLOOR PLANSPLAN 3X PERSPECTIVESPLAN 3X FRONT ELEVATIONSPLAN 3BX - IRVING GILL INSPIRED ELEVATIONSPLAN 3CX - WRIGHTIAN ELEVATIONSPLAN 3DX - CONTEMPORARY MODERN ELEVATIONSPLAN 3X FLOOR PLANSA0.0A0.1A0.2OS.1A1.0A1.1A1.2A1.3A1.4A1.5A1.6A2.0A2.1A2.2A2.3A2.4A2.5A2.6A2.7A2.8A2.9A2.10A2.11A3.0A3.1A3.2A3.3A3.4A3.5A3.6A4.0A4.1A4.2A4.3A4.4A4.5A4.6A4.7A4.8A4.9A4.10A4.11LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECIVIL ENGINEERINGA5.0A5.1A6.0A6.1A6.2A6.3L-1L-2L-3L-4L-5L-6OS-1ES1ES2ES3ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROJECT SUMMARY - SITE 1BUILDING AND ZONING CODE SUMMARYTYPE OF CONSTRUCTIONV-BPROPOSED FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMNFPA 13DEXISTING ZONINGC-1PROPOSED ZONINGORANGE-OLIVE SPECIFIC PLANPROPOSED OCCUPANCY GROUP:R-3LAND USE DESIGNATIONEXISTINGLMDRPROPOSEDLMDR(Low Medium Residential)PROJECT SUMMARYAREA:±2.9 AC (126,324 SF±)UNITS:32 DUDENSITY:11.0 DU/ACFAR:62,924 SF/126,324 SF= .498LOT COVERAGE:38,660 SF ±UNIT PLAN SUMMARYPLAN 1 PLAN 2PLAN 3DESCRIPTION2-STORY 2-STORY2-STORY3BD+OFFICE+LOFT/2.5 BA3BD+LOFT/2.5 BA4BD/3.5BA# OF UNITS11 912TOTAL LIVING PER PLAN (GROSS)1891 SF (±) (20,801 SF) 1947 SF (±) (17,523 SF)2050 SF (±) (24,600 SF)GARAGE (GROSS)434 SF (±) (4,774 SF) 431 SF (±) (3,879 SF)467 SF (±) (5,604 SF)TOTAL LIVING AREA (GROSS)(62,924 SF) (±)*Floor Plan Area calculations per Section C.2 of Land Use Project Application**Per Section 17.14.130.C, residential units must be a minimum of 900 sf for 3bd units & 1050 for 4bdunits (600sf for 1st bedroom+150sf for each additional bedroom thereafter)PARKING SUMMARY (SEE NOTE FOR STRIPING)PRIVATE GARAGE SPACES64OPEN PARKING SPACES28(13 DRIVE - 10'-0" x 18'-0" STD), (11 INTERIOR STREET - 9'-0" x 24'-0" PARALLEL), AND (4 COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE - 9'-0" x 18'-0")REQUIRED RATIO2.88 PER UNIT (2 PRIVATE GARAGES SPACES PER DU + 0.88 PER DU FOR GUEST)PROVIDED RATIO2.9 PER UNITTOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED92.16 (32 DU; 2.88 /UNIT)TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED92LANDSCAPE AREA EXISTING VS. PROPOSEDEXISTING COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPED AREA - 8,173 SFPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPED AREA - TOTAL (41,625 SF)All COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS - 19,535 SFPRIVATE YARD AREAS - 22,090 SFSTORAGE SUMMARYREQUIRED STORAGE PER OMC SECTION 17.14.140PROVIDED STORAGE IN R-3 AND R-4 DISTRICT SHALL BE AT LEAST 120 CUBIC FEET FOR EACH UNIT.PROPOSED UNITS CONTAIN OVERHEAD STORAGE OF 120 CUBIC FT (APP. 60 SQ FT) PER UNITTOTAL STORAGE REQUIRED3840 CUBIC FT (APP. 1280 SQ. FT)TOTAL STORAGE PROVIDED3840 CUBIC FT (APP. 1280 SQ. FT)BICYCLE AND MOTORCYCLEPROVIDED 4 BICYCLE RACKSPROVIDED 3 MOTORCYCLE SPACEA0.2ARCHITECTURAL PLOT EXHIBIT0306015Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:July 21, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26SCALE 1"=30'-0" (1) (2)(3)(6)(7) (4)(5)(8) (9) (10) (11) (12)(13) (14) (15)(16) (17) (18) (19)(20)(24) (21) (22) (23) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30)(31) (32) 9 8 7 6 5 2 1 4 3 11 13 14 15 16 21 12 19 18 20 2228 10 17 24 25 26 27 23T E. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkO.S. HOA COMMON LANDSCAPE HOA MAINTAINED (Pervious) Takeoff: 17,972 sf O.S. HOA PROGRAMMED COMMON AREA HOA MAINTAINED (Min. 10` Dimension). Takeoff: 1,563 sf O.S. CITY PARKWAYS LANDSCAPE HOA MAINTAINED (Pervious) Takeoff: 3,095 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 1 BY LOT Takeoff: 722 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 2 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 307 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 3 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 412 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 4 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 628 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 5 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 1 Takeoff: 680 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 6 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 408 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 7 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 406 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 8 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 548 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 9 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 738 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 10 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 685 sf OPEN SPACE LEGEND O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 11 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 787 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 12 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 982 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 13 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 773 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 14 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 598 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 15 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 701 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 16 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 448 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 17 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 300 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 18 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 650 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 19 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 784 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 20 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 790 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 21 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 916 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 22 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 685 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 23 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 746 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 24 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 766 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 25 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 1000 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 26 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 845 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 27 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 1,042 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 28 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 1,035 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 29 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 1,120 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 30 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 610 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 31 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 307 sf O.S. PRIVATE YARD - LOT 32 HOMEOWNER INSTALLED & MAINTAINED. Takeoff: 671 sf OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: TOTAL HOA COMMON OPEN SPACE = 19,535‬ SF (17,972 SF + 1,563 SF) TOTAL PRIVATE YARD OPEN SPACE= 22,090 SF TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED= 41,625 SF (Not Including City Parkways) Schematic Open Space Plan “Cohen Property” - Orange, CA David Cohen Project No.: PRS01-D Date: May 29, 2020 5th - City Submittal OS-1 40' Scale: 1" = 20' 0 20'10' ROW / P.L. ROW / P.L. Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 1.0STREET PERSPECTIVELOOKING TOWARDS PARKNTS Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 1.1STREET PERSPECTIVELOOKING INTO CLUSTERNTS Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 1.2STREET PERSPECTIVECORNER VIEW E. GROVE/ OLIVE STREETNTS Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 1.3STREET PERSPECTIVEENTRY VIEW E. GROVENTS A1.4STREET SCENEE. GROVE AVENUE081624Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCITRUS GROVE# 2018-0730Cohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Plot Date:June 1, 2020Pre Submittal :ENLARGED NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRYSTREET SCENE AT E. GROVE AVE. A1.5STREET SCENEINTERNAL STREET081624Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCITRUS GROVE# 2018-0730Cohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Plot Date:June 1, 2020Pre Submittal :STREET SCENE FROM INTERNAL STREET A1.6STREET SCENEORANGE OLIVE081624Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCITRUS GROVE# 2018-0730Cohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Plot Date:June 1, 2020Pre Submittal :STREET SCENE AT ORANGE OLIVE STREET A2.0Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1PERSPECTIVES0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"PERSPECTIVE PLAN 1CPERSPECTIVE PLAN 1DPERSPECTIVE PLAN 1APERSPECTIVE PLAN 1B 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"39'-6"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"38'-6"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"A2.1Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1FRONT ELEVATIONS0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEV. PLAN 1CFRONT ELEV. PLAN 1DFRONT ELEV. PLAN 1AFRONT ELEV. PLAN 1B 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"38'-6"38'-6"36'-6"36'-6"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Low Profile Tile Roof2x6 Exposed Wood Truss TailsStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Eave, Smooth FinishSmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsTiered Stucco CapFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A2.2Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1A ELEVATIONSMODERN SPANISH0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION21456123117101413915181920171610 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-5"38'-6"36'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Low Profile Tile Roof2x6 Exposed Wood Truss TailsStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Eave, Smooth FinishSmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsTiered Stucco CapFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A2.3Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1A-X ELEVATIONSMODERN SPANISH0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION1720151324191951269 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"36'-0"35'-2"35'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,&Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A2.4Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1B ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION16191088102171120171815121453 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"37'-0"34'-10"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,&Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A2.5Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1B-X ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION810219120171551112 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"39'-6"39'-6"37'-4"37'-4"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill cap123467891011121314155161718192021A2.6Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1C ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION18191611231451361591717841292121 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"39'-6"37'-4"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill cap123467891011121314155161718192021A2.7Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1C-X ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION19161514679113218810912 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"36'-0"36'-0"35'-2"35'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign12346789101112131415516A2.8Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1D ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"LEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION2710611416111215133594879456 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"37'-0"35'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign12346789101112131415516A2.9Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 1D-X ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"LEFT ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION2121614511931186 FRONTREARLEFTRIGHTHIGH WINDOW AT SOMELOCATIONSOVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT6'-0"10'-0"CONDENSER UNITLOCATIONArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 2.10PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLAN3 BED & LOFT - 2.5 BATH0248Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" FRONTREARLEFTRIGHTHIGH WINDOW AT SOMELOCATIONSOVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT6'-0"10'-0"CONDENSER UNITLOCATIONArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 2.11PLAN 1X - FLOOR PLAN3 BED & LOFT - 2.5 BATH0248Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A3.0Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2PERSPECTIVES0248NTSNot To ScalePERSPECTIVE PLAN 2CPERSPECTIVE PLAN 2DPERSPECTIVE PLAN 2APERSPECTIVE PLAN 2B 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"40'-9"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"42'-7"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-2"43'-3"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±24'-11"40'-9"A3.1Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2FRONT ELEVATIONS0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEV. PLAN 2CFRONT ELEV. PLAN 2DFRONT ELEV. PLAN 2AFRONT ELEV. PLAN 2B 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-2"43'-3"43'-3"40'-2"40'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Low Profile Tile Roof2x6 Exposed Wood Truss TailsStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Eave, Smooth FinishSmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsTiered Stucco CapFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A3.2Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2A ELEVATIONSMODERN SPANISH0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION214514131519181017201112837 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"40'-9"40'-9"40'-2"40'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,&Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A3.3Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2B ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION1719108810211201815145312974212016 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±26'-6"42'-7"42'-7"41'-2"41'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill capParapet Wall12346789101112131415516171819202122A3.4Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2C ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION18112314513616178412917191059101999221521 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±24'-11"40'-9"40'-9"40'-2"40'-2"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign12346789101112131415516A3.5Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 2D ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"LEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION2710115111216359487961413 FRONTREARLEFTRIGHTOVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT6'-0"10'-0"CONDENSER UNITLOCATIONArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 3.6PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLAN3 BED & LOFT - 2.5 BATH0248Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A4.0Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3PERSPECTIVES0248NTSNot To ScalePERSPECTIVE PLAN 3CPERSPECTIVE PLAN 3DPERSPECTIVE PLAN 3B 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-4"59'-6"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±25'-6"61'-3"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"59'-6"A4.1Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3FRONT ELEVATIONS0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEV. PLAN 3BFRONT ELEV. PLAN 3CFRONT ELEV. PLAN 3D 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-4"59'-6"59'-6"26'-9"26'-9"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,&Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A4.2Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3B ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION89151720719131118125101216 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±25'-6"61'-3"59'-6"26'-9"26'-9"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill cap123467891011121314155161718192021A4.3Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3C ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION214161918520712131731511194681021 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"59'-6"59'-6"26'-3"26'-3"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign12346789101112131415516A4.4Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3D ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION1412162789115361101513 FRONTREARLEFT RIGHTOVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FT10'-0"6'-0"CONDENSERUNITPER SITEArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 4.5PLAN 3 - FLOOR PLAN4 BED - 3.5 BATH0248Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A4.6Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3XPERSPECTIVES0248NTSNot To ScalePERSPECTIVE PLAN 3CXPERSPECTIVE PLAN 3DXPERSPECTIVE PLAN 3BX 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-0"59'-6"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±25'-6"63'-0"9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"60'-6"A4.7Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3XFRONT ELEVATIONS0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"FRONT ELEV. PLAN 3BXFRONT ELEV. PLAN 3CXFRONT ELEV. PLAN 3DX 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-0"59'-6"59'-6"27'-4"27'-4"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth FinishUtility PenthouseFaux Wood Trim w/ Fiber Cement PanelsSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Stucco Bay WindowDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl Windows w/ Decorative MuttinsStucco Arched SoffitFlat Bar Metal RailingStucco Barranca w/ Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Scupper, Leader Head,&Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign1234678910111213141551617181920A4.8Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3BX ELEVATIONSIRVING GILL INSPIRED0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION8915172071913111251012 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±25'-6"63'-0"63'-0"28'-9"28'-9"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishConcrete Flat Tile RoofStucco Faux ChimneySmall Expansion Joint at StuccoStucco o/ Foam Surround, Smooth FinishStucco o/ Foam Corbel, Smooth Finish2x3 Trim o/ 2x6 Wood FasciaFiber Cement PanelsFaux Wood TrimDecorative Reinforced Wood EyebrowVinyl WindowsBrick/Stone Veneer w/ Stone CapStucco Barranca w/ Smooth Stucco CapFiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French / Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorMetal Gutter & Downspout (Shown Dashed)Decorative Exterior Lights & Address SignFlat Bar Metal RailingsRecessed Veneer Lintel/Sill cap123467891011121314155161718192021A4.9Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3CX ELEVATIONSWRIGHTIAN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION214161918207121331119481021 9'-1"T.O.PL9'-1"FF±27'-6"60'-6"60'-6"29'-3"29'-3"LEGENDStucco, 16/20 FinishFiber Cement Horizontal SidingParapet WallStucco Faux ChimneyUtility PenthouseSmall Expansion Joints at StuccoFaux Wood TrimDecorative Metal EyebrowVinyl WindowsFlat Bar Metal RailingsDecorative Scupper, Leader Box& Downspout (Shown Dashed)Fiberglass Entry DoorsFiberglass French/ Slider DoorMetal Sectional Garage DoorFiberglass Man-DoorDecorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign12346789101112131415516A4.10Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26PLAN 3DX ELEVATIONSCONTEMPORARY MODERN0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"0248Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"REAR ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION131627891153611014 REARFRONTRIGHT LEFT6'-0"10'-0"CONDENSER UNITOVERHEADSTORAGE120 C.FTArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 4.11PLAN 3X - FLOOR PLAN4 BED - 3.5 BATH0248Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"ENHANCED STREET ELEVATION 88'-7"PLAN 3PLAN 3RPLAN 2PLAN 144'-7"8'-9"4'-1"24'-0"6'-0" 7'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0"5'-0"5'-0"10'-10 1/2"10'-10 1/2"19'-0"9'-0" 12'-0" 12'-2"±MOTORCOURTRTA/CRTRTA/CRTA/CYrd 3Yrd 3Yrd 1Yrd 2135'-6"67'-9"67'-9"6'-6"16'-0"± 16'-0"±FIRST LEVELGGGGArchitecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 5.0CLUSTER PLANFIRST LEVEL04816Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 88'-7"PLAN 3PLAN 3RPLAN 2PLAN 136'-10"6'-0" 7'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0"5'-0"5'-0"10'-10 1/2"10'-10 1/2"12'-0" 12'-2"±MOTORCOURTA/CYrd 3Yrd 3Yrd 1Yrd 2135'-6"67'-9"67'-9"6'-6"16'-0"± 16'-0"±SECOND LEVEL6'-6"Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A 5.1CLUSTER PLANSECOND LEVEL04816Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A6.0MODERN SPANISHCOLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A6.1CONTEMPORARY MODERNCOLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A6.2WRIGHTIANCOLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD Architecture + Planning17911 Von Karman Ave,Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614949.851.2133ktgy.comCOHEN PROPERTY# 2018-0730Plot Date:June 1, 2020CONCEPTUAL DESIGNCohen Living Trust4922 E. Somerton Ave.Orange, CA 92867Latest Submittal:2020-05-26A6.3IRVING GILL INSPIREDCOLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD 40' Scale: 1" = 20' 0 20'10' Schematic Landscape Plan “Cohen Property” - Orange, CA David Cohen Project No.: PRS01-D Date: May 29, 2020 5th - City Submittal 3 L-1 Central community open space area with built in BBQ Counter, wood shade structure, 2 sided gas fireplace, Bike racks and lounge furniture for small social events and group gatherings. Two community cluster mailboxes, per USPS review and approval. Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan. Enhanced paving at main project entry. Proposed and existing trees, per Planting Plan. Pedestrian natural color community sidewalk with light top-cast finish and saw-cut joints. Accessible parking stall and striping, per Civil plans. Guest parking stall. Natural colored concrete driveway, with light broom finish and tooled joints. Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained. Property line per Civil Engineer plan. Public street R.O.W. per Civil Engineer plan. Existing public street sidewalk, per Civil plans. FDC's BFD's and Transformer to be screened with landscape, quantity and final locations to be determined per Civil Plans. 5. 9. 8. 7. 6. 4. 3. 2. 1. LEGEND 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 536 3 1 5 6 8 11 10143 9 2 711 11 15 11 10 12 13 9 1 1 1 4 1111114 9 18 5 5 5 Proposed Bike Rack 15 15 ROW / P.L. ROW / P.L. Existing Tree to be Removed Schematic Enlargement Plan - Central Community Open Space “Cohen Property” - Orange, CA David Cohen Project No.: PRS01-D Date: May 29, 2020 5th - City Submittal L-2 8' Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0 4'2' Built in BBQ Counter. Wood shade structure. 2 sided gas fireplace. Transformer to be screened with Landscape, quantity and final locations to be determined. Lounge furniture. Bike rack. Picnic Table and Trash Receptacle. Two community cluster mailboxes, per USPS review and approval. Proposed tree, per Planting Plan. Pedestrian natural color community sidewalk with light top-cast finish and saw-cut joints. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained. Enhanced Paving (pedestrian pavers to be determined). Guest Parking stalls per Civil Plans. 5. 9. 8. 7. 6. 4. 3. 2. 1. LEGEND 10. 11. 1 1 2 3 3 9 8 4 7 10 6 2 5 11 11 12. 12 13 13. (1) (2)(3)(6)(7) (4)(5)(8) (9) (10) (11) (12)(13) (14) (15)(16) (17) (18) (19)(20)(24) (21) (22) (23) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30)(31) (32) 9 8 7 6 5 2 1 4 3 11 13 14 15 16 21 12 19 18 20 2228 10 17 24 25 26 27 23T E. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkWALL LEGEND Existing Perimeter Walls & Pilaster(s) to Remain, if possible. 6'-0" High Perimeter Stucco Wall with Flat Stucco Cap. (Color to complement Architecture) 3'-6" High Stucco Patio Wall with Precast Concrete Cap. 5'-6" High Vinyl Fence (Tan Color). 5'-0" High Perimeter T.S. Metal Fence (Black Color). 6'-3" High Stucco Pilaster Flat Stucco Cap. (Color to complement Architecture) ±5'-6" High Vinyl Private Yard Gate (Tan / White Color) 3'-6" High Metal Patio Gate. ±6'-0" High potential monument wall with project name / lettering attached to wall, (stucco to complement Architecture with precast cap) - per future submittal. Schematic Wall & Fence Plan “Cohen Property” - Orange, CA David Cohen Project No.: PRS01-D Date: July 21, 2020 5th - City Submittal 1 L-3 40' Scale: 1" = 20' 0 20'10' 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 5 6 4 37 * Conceptual image only Existing East PL wall to be enhanced as needed to a Min. Height of 6'-0"8 8 Existing North PL Wall to remain and protect in place.Existing Wall, Steps Down towards R/W Existing Wall, Steps Down towards R/W ROW / P.L. ROW / P.L.POTENTIAL MONUMENT WALLS (1) (2)(3)(6)(7) (4)(5)(8) (9) (10) (11) (12)(13) (14) (15)(16) (17) (18) (19)(20)(24) (21) (22) (23) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30)(31) (32) 9 8 7 6 5 2 1 4 3 11 13 14 15 16 21 12 19 18 20 2228 10 17 24 25 26 27 23T E. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkOlea e. Wilsonii (Fruitless Olive) Type/Form Platanus x acerifolia 'Columbia' Cupressus sempervirens (Italian Cypress) PLANTING LEGEND PALMS Symbol Flowering Vertical Specimen Large Columnar Trunk Single Single Single Single Botanical Name (Common Name) Suggestions Tristania conferta (Brisbane Box) Buffer Single SingleEriobotrya deflexa (Bronze Loquat) Arbutus 'Marina' (Strawberry Tree)Street Size 36" Box 24" Box 24" Box 15 Gal 15 Gal 15 Gal Phoenix dactylifera (Date Palm)Vertical Single 8-10' BT TREES Low Med Low (Reg 3)Qty. 5 16 17 Med 25 Med 8 Low 4 Low 39 Myrtus communis ‘Boetica’ (Boetica Myrtle) Canopy WUCOL Total Trees=114 VINES & ESPALIERS Handroanthus impetiginosus (Pink Trumpet in Parkways) Existing Tree Jacaranda mimosifolia (jacaranda)Canopy --Med Per Plan VINES & ESPALIERS Bougainvillea 'Red & White' Macfadyena unguis-cati Type/FormSymbol SizeSuggestions (Reg 3)Qty. WUCOL Espalier 5 Gal Low 6 1 Gal Low 7Vine (Bougainvillea) (Cat's Claw Vine) Schematic Planting Plan “Cohen Property” - Orange, CA David Cohen Project No.: PRS01-D Date: May 29, 2020 5th - City Submittal L-4 40' Scale: 1" = 20' 0 20'10' NOTES: 1.Irrigation (including spray and/or drip) will be provided, in the Construction Document phase, and to be installed per local California water regulations (AB1881) . 2.Transformers, back-flow preventers & other above-ground utilities to be screened with landscape as permitted per local codes & regulations. 3.Landscape lighting (landscape up-lights, path lights/bollards, etc.) to be coordinated with Electrical Engineer in future phase. 4.The plant palette listed provides a list of plant material to select from when preparing final landscape construction documents for this project. However, substitutions may be required due to availability, soils tests, or other conditions. 5.All trees within 5' of hardscape to be installed with deep root barriers. 6.Trees planted along the fire access roadway and/or firefighter required walkway shall not impede the required minimum 5'0” walkway width or the required fire apparatus vertical clearance of 13'-6”. The trees should be a type that the natural growth pattern would allow the required vertical clearance without reliance on regular maintenance of the tree canopies. SHRUBS and GROUND COVER Agave Blue Glow Blue Glow Agave Aloe 'Super Red' Aloe Rosmarinus p. Aeonium sp.Aeonium Carex divulsa Berkeley Sedge Nassella pulchra Purple Needlegrass Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass Bougainvillea La Jolla La Jolla Bougainvillea Dasylirion longissimum Mexican Grass Tree Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Baccharis pilularis Coyote Brush Yucca Bright Star Bright Star Yucca Juncus patens Juncus Echeveria sp.Echeveria Senecio m. Dianella revoluta Flax Lily Ligustrum j. `Texanum`Wax Leaf Privet Salvia greggii Red Red Texas Sage Westringia fruticosa Coast Rosemary Tecoma stans Yellow Bells Lantana 'New Gold''New Gold' Lantana Existing Parkway Trees to Remain Existing Parkway Tree to be removed to allow for new project entry drive Existing Parkway Trees to Remain Vines on wall, per legend Espalier on wall, per legend 'Huntington Carpet''Blue Chalk Sticks' Proposed tree Handroanthus impetiginosus to match adjacent street trees or as approved by City Staff . ROW / P.L. ROW / P.L. (1) (2)(3)(6)(7) (4)(5)(8) (9) (10) (11) (12)(13) (14) (15)(16) (17) (18) (19)(20)(24) (21) (22) (23) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30)(31) (32) 9 8 7 6 5 2 1 4 3 11 13 14 15 16 21 12 19 18 20 2228 10 17 24 25 26 27 23T E. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkHYDROZONE A: HOA - RESIDENTIAL NARROW CORRIDORS IRRIGATION - LOW WATER USE SHRUBS, GROUNDCOVER AND TREES WITH IN-LINE EMITTER DRIP IRRIGATION. PLANT FACTOR = 0.3, IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY = 0.80. Takeoff: 2,739 sf HYDROZONE B: HOA - FRONT YARD & DRIVE COURT IRRIGATION - LOW WATER USE SHRUBS, GROUNDCOVER AND TREES WITH IN-LINE EMITTER DRIP IRRIGATION. PLANT FACTOR = 0.3-0.5, IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY = 0.80. Takeoff: 15,085 sf HYDROZONE C: HOA - RESIDENTAIL POCKET PARK IRRIGATION; MEDIUM WATER USE SHRUBS, GROUNDCOVER AND TREES WITH IN-LINE EMITTER DRIP IRRIGATION. PLANT FACTOR = 0.5, IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY = 0.80. Takeoff: 559 sf HYDROZONE D: CITY PARKWAYS (HOA MAINTAINED) IRRIGATION - MEDIUM WATER USE SHRUBS, GROUNDCOVER AND TREES WITH IN-LINE EMITTER DRIP IRRIGATION. PLANT FACTOR = 0.5, IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY = 0.80. Takeoff: 2,854 sf PRIVATE YARD HYDROZONE (To be determined by Homeowner - Homeowner Installed & Maintained). Takeoff: 22,139 sf CONCEPT HYDROZONE (IRRIGATION) LEGEND Schematic Preliminary Irrigation Hydrozone Plan “Cohen Property” - Orange, CA David Cohen Project No.: PRS01-D Date: May 29, 2020 5th - City Submittal L-5 40' Scale: 1" = 20' 0 20'10' NOTE: THIS SHEET FOR PRELIMINARY IRRIGATION HYDROZONES, REFER TO SHEET OS-1 FOR THE OPEN SPACE PLAN. ROW / P.L. ROW / P.L. (1) (2)(3)(6)(7) (4)(5)(8) (9) (10) (11) (12)(13) (14) (15)(16) (17) (18) (19)(20)(24) (21) (22) (23) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30)(31) (32) 9 8 7 6 5 2 1 4 3 11 13 14 15 16 21 12 19 18 20 2228 10 17 24 25 26 27 23T E. G R O VE A V E.O R A N G E O L I V E R D.Limit of Work Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkSYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY Tree / sign uplight, staked - Kichler model #16019 AZT27 5 Cast aluminum, Textured Architectural Bronze, Staked Lamp: LED, 6.5, 2700K Warm White In-ground Flush Mounted - Kichler model #15266AZ with Rock Guard 15688 and Lamp: 8 PAR 36 18182 Brass, Bronzed Brass, In-Ground / Flush, Bronze Color. Lamp: LED, 13.2, 2700K Warm White LIGHTING SCHEDULE Wall Sconce - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 97 Bollards - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 30 Pole Light - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 16 Shade Structure down light - per Electrical Engineer's plans. 4 *Final locations and quantities of 120v fixtures per electrical photometric plans. SYMBOL *Final locations and quantities of 120v fixtures per electrical photometric plans. Schematic Lighting Plan “Cohen Property” - Orange, CA David Cohen Project No.: PRS01-D Date: May 29, 2020 5th - City Submittal L-6 40' Scale: 1" = 20' 0 20'10' NOTES: 1.Landscape lighting (landscape up-lights) have been coordinated with Electrical Engineer - see Photometric Plans by South West Group for all final, site lighting information, quantities and specifications. 2.All site lighting to be shielded to prevent / minimize light wash onto neighboring properties. ROW / P.L. ROW / P.L. z c::: �� <( V) (1) 0::: I- c .x: :-i u b.O 0 I- w 0:::: c u � � ci Cf) .... <C Ni 0 � "O I w a: U) w 0 cu ·s: � l 0 0 0 en 0:::: cc cu cu _J w 0 ""' Q. ..... � 0 en 0.... (.) z O'I ..... <C 0:: >- I- U) <C c2 u w 0 :z z en j:: w 0:::: > z <( w w oi:::t !;;; c Uu z <( <( C/)w � 0 0 => - w N c... 0::: t-- q. :::c z c � 0 <( :z <"') � u in N _J :5 �� <C u c w z � => _J � 0 s 0:::: 0:::: u 5roffi c <C ""' 'oclz z 0:::: ....; :r: 8�� w 0 c. w a:ow :::c ..... cu > O�I 0 0 V) u u w _J I- uu - <( z z I- w => Uo.... >< >< o....w 0:: 0 >- -u ::::, Wz Ww t: CD ::J 9 0::: 0::: _J a:: z z <( <( - => :r: 0:: I U) I- Cf) � u !:!::! ""'C ::::, 'a:: �� LL o6 U) w L.. � U) w :r: a:: _J => I- 0 cu t: u �c2 LL O cr, 0 w:::, cr, en z Wz CD w �0 (9 <( s co UW � CD U) !:::::: z w- a:: oI => <( Cf) >. zU 0 _J > :5 � CD <( t= _J <( u cu I- ·;:::: Q) a. <( Q) 0 (.) ...,t-J cu L.. ai' � c, C> c: c: 0::: CtS w Q) Q) � I- 0 z Cl. ..c: w � => cu 0 0::: C) 0 en I- � w => 65 !--'- u >< (.) (.) I- a::� E u a >- Cf) <( z Cf) Wz z => 85� CD in � ::J9 ""'C w 0::: z a:: CD <"') u a:: z I- 22 CD C) � <( - c :E 0 r-- I U) Cf) �6 s u!:!:c! <( z � 'a:: cu w �> <( w U) w w wo w � U) _J 1-- 0 U) 0 w I- � a:: _J <( a:: a:: :i: c:o � 22 en IO u s :r: wu <( w:::, Cf) CD - u 0... I- ,Z _J i= <( u Oz 0.... w (_) w 0- w I co !:::::: 0 <( I- 0I s ln 0::: U) zU w :5 � LL <( w 1-- 0.... <( Cf) w w <( o 0.... I- u <( <( I- c <( w z u (9 (9 I- <( o6 o6 w 0 in o6 0::: z uI _J <"') w w u u _J 0 u (_) o <( r-- u z :::, 0 s z 0... � z s � w z 0 0... <( w w LL w z u (_) ;?; LL 0 I- 0 LL <( ·�g u :i: _J cr, I- I- I-(/) 0 ...r s <( cr, _J co Cf) � :5 � u CD >- ...J u I- s ::,.::: <( Um:::l <( => i= w � z a: u w Q<C I- w > 0 a: z;?; 3: I � a: s w 0... <( >---- Cf) I- <( w 0::: 0:: � � U) > (_) w <( z 0.... 0 :c::i- <( u w � S2 � � LL _J �s': L