Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-20-20 574 S. Glassell - Park Plaza Memory Care (DRC 4973-19) ATT. 5- MND No. 1866-19
PARK PLAZA MEMORY CARE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1866-19 Lead Agency: City of Orange Community Development Department • Planning Division 300 East Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866-1591 (714) 744 7220 (714) 744 7222 (Fax) www.cityoforange.org Prepared by: CAJA Environmental Services, LLC 15350 Sherman Way, Suite 315 Van Nuys, CA 91406 (310) 469 6700 May 2020 Page i Sections Page # Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1866-19 ........................................................................................... 1 Existing Setting ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description .................................................................................................................................. 4 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ........................................................................................... 17 1. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................. 19 2. Agricultural Resources .............................................................................................................. 23 3. Air Quality ................................................................................................................................ 27 4. Biological Resources ................................................................................................................. 45 5. Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 57 6. Energy ...................................................................................................................................... 67 7. Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................................... 73 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ....................................................................................................... 80 9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials............................................................................................ 107 10. Hydrology and Water Quality.................................................................................................. 115 11. Land Use and Planning ........................................................................................................... 125 12. Mineral Resources .................................................................................................................. 131 13. Noise ...................................................................................................................................... 133 14. Population and Housing .......................................................................................................... 157 15. Public Services........................................................................................................................ 159 16. Recreation .............................................................................................................................. 164 17. Transportation ......................................................................................................................... 166 18. Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 196 19. Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................................................. 200 Page ii 20. Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................................ 208 Figures Figure 1 Regional Map ................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2 Aerial Map ..................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3 Overall Site Plan ............................................................................................................. 6 Figure 4 Fire Master Plan ............................................................................................................. 7 Figure 5 Ground Floor Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 Figure 6 Second Floor Plan .......................................................................................................... 9 Figure 7 Fire Master Plan ........................................................................................................... 10 Figure 8 Typical Unit Plan.......................................................................................................... 11 Figure 9 Building Sections ......................................................................................................... 12 Figure 10 North and East Exterior Elevations ............................................................................... 13 Figure 11 South and West Exterior Elevations .............................................................................. 14 Figure 12 Perspectives .................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 13 Materials and Color Board ............................................................................................ 16 Figure 14 Arborist Site Plan ......................................................................................................... 50 Figure 15 Noise Receptor & Monitoring Location Map .............................................................. 148 Figure 16 Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................. 168 Figure 17 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Control ............................................... 169 Figure 18 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................... 170 Figure 19 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .................................................................... 171 Figure 20 Project Traffic Distribution Pattern ............................................................................. 177 Figure 21 AM Peak Hour Project – Generated Traffic Volumes .................................................. 179 Figure 22 PM Peak Hour Project – Generated Traffic Volumes .................................................. 180 Figure 23 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................ 181 Figure 24 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................. 182 Figure 25 Location of Cumulative Projects ................................................................................. 186 Figure 26 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Project Only Traffic Volumes .......................................... 187 Figure 27 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Project Only Traffic Volumes ........................................... 188 Figure 28 Year 2021 Cumulative Base AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..................................... 189 Figure 29 Year 2021 Cumulative Base PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...................................... 190 Figure 30 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .......................... 192 Figure 31 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................... 193 Page iii Tables Table 1 State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment for Orange County ........................................................................................................................ 29 Table 2 Ambient Air Quality Data – SRA No. 17 “Central Orange County” .............................. 35 Table 3 Existing Project Site Daily Operations Emissions.......................................................... 37 Table 4 SCAQMD Construction Emissions Thresholds ............................................................. 38 Table 5 SCAQMD Operational Emissions Thresholds ............................................................... 39 Table 6 Approximate Construction Schedule ............................................................................. 41 Table 7 Regional and Localized Construction Emissions ........................................................... 41 Table 8 Regional and Localized Operational Emissions ............................................................. 42 Table 9 Tree Matrix .................................................................................................................. 51 Table 10 Summary of Energy Use During Project Construction .................................................. 69 Table 11 Estimated Project Electricity Demand ........................................................................... 70 Table 12 Estimated Project Natural Gas Demand ........................................................................ 70 Table 13 Estimated Project Transportation Petroleum-Based Fuel .............................................. 71 Table 14 California GHG Inventory (million metric tons CO2e) ................................................... 86 Table 15 Consistency Analysis – Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update ........................ 90 Table 16 Consistency Analysis – 2017 Scoping Plan Update ....................................................... 96 Table 17 Consistency with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS ................................................................... 99 Table 18 Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Natural Resources Element ..................... 101 Table 19 Construction Related GHG Emissions ........................................................................ 105 Table 20 Annual GHG Emissions Summary .............................................................................. 106 Table 21 2-Year-Storm Event Information ................................................................................ 120 Table 22 Project Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Land Use Element of the City of Orange General Plan ....................................................................................... 127 Table 23 A-Weighted Decibel Scale .......................................................................................... 134 Table 24 City of Orange Noise Element Table N3: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure --- Transportation Sources .......................................................................................... 141 Table 25 City of Orange Noise Element Table N4: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure --- Stationary Sources ................................................................................................. 142 Table 26 FTA Construction Vibration Damage Criteria ............................................................. 145 Table 27 Existing Noise Levels ................................................................................................. 147 Table 28 Construction Noise Levels - Grading .......................................................................... 152 Table 29 Building Damage Vibration Levels at Off-Site Structures ........................................... 155 Page iv Table 30 City of Orange Population Growth Forecasts, 2010-2035 ............................................ 157 Table 31 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections .................................................. 173 Table 32 LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ................................................................ 174 Table 33 Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service ......................................................................... 175 Table 34 Project Traffic Generation Forecast............................................................................. 176 Table 35 Existing (Year 2019) Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis .............. 183 Table 36 Cumulative Projects Description and Trip Generation Estimates ................................. 185 Table 37 Year 2021 Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ............................... 191 Table 38 Estimated Project Wastewater Generation/Water Consumption ................................... 202 Table 39 Wastewater Treatment Plant ....................................................................................... 203 Table 40 Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison (AF)................................................... 205 Table 41 Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison (AF).............................................. 205 Table 42 Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison (AF) ......................................... 205 Table 43 Landfill Capacity ........................................................................................................ 206 Table 44 Estimated Project Solid Waste Generation .................................................................. 207 Appendices A. AQ and GHG Modeling Results B. Biological Resources 1. Arborist Report 2. Arborist Site Plan with Trees C. Cultural Resources 1. Historic Resources Report 2. Archaeological Resources Letter D. Energy Calculations E. Geology & Soils 1. Geotechnical Report 2. Paleontological Resources Letter Page v F. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1. Phase I ESA 2. Limited Phase II ESA G. Preliminary WQMP H. Noise Modeling Results I. Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1866-19 Project Title: Reference Application Numbers: Park Plaza Memory Care ExpansionCUP No. 3085-19, MJSP No. 0972-19, DRC No. 4973-19, ENV No. 1866-19 Lead Agency: Contact Person and Telephone No.: City of Orange Kelly Christensen Ribuffo, Associate Planner (714) 744-7223 Project Proponent and Address: Contact Person and Telephone No.: KC Orange II, LP Axel Guerra 5790 Feet Street, Suite 300 (760) 804-7065 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Location: 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 EXISTING SETTING Regional Setting: The Project Site is located in the Old Towne area of the City of Orange (City), in the north-central portion of Orange County (County), approximately 12 miles northeast of the Pacific Ocean. The City shares its boundaries with the Cities of Anaheim to the north and west, Garden Grove to the west, Santa Ana to the west and south, and Tustin to the southeast. To the east of the City is unincorporated Orange County. The City of Villa Park is completely contained within the borders of Orange. Existing Site Conditions: The 0.917-acre Project Site is located at 574 S. Glassell Street and comprises Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 390-591-19). Regional access is provided to the Project Site via State Route 22 located approximately 0.16 miles to the south; Interstate 5 located approximately 1.3 miles to the west; and State Route 55 located approximately 1.3 miles to the east. Local access is provided via S. Glassell Street and W. La Veta Avenue. The regional and local context of the Project Site is shown on Figures 1 and 2. The Project Site is bound by the existing Park Plaza Senior Living Community to the south, S. Glassell Street to the east, a church to the north, and a sports field and storage structures to the west. 210 10 915 605 22 405 Pasadena Whittier 60 Long Beach Lakewood Montebello Monterey Pk Anaheim Fullerton City of Industry Walnut Monrovia Azusa San Dimas RIVERSIDE COUNTY Corona Chino Hills Diamond Bar Orange Yorba Linda Huntington Beach Santa Fe Springs Santa Ana Irvine Chino Rancho Cucamonga Pomona 15 60 66 2 83 210 5 90 55 91Cerritos Los Alamitos Brea Ontario ORANGE COUNTY 241 241 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 39 Arcadia Baldwin Park West Covina Villa Park LOS ANGELES COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Miles 0105 Pacific Ocean 57 55 261 133 Tustin Costa Mesa Bellflower Downey 39 PROJECT LOCATION Source: Google Maps 2019. Figure 1 Regional Map Legend Project Site Scale (Feet) 0 200 400 Source: Google Maps 2019. Figure 2 Aerial Map Legend Project Site S GLASSELL STS GLASSELL STE RIVER AVEE RIVER AVE FAIRWAY DRFAIRWAY DR Page 4 The Project Site is currently developed with a 5,959-square-foot restaurant building and a surface parking lot. Existing vehicle access to the Project Site is provided via one driveway located at the northern edge of the site from S. Glassell Street. The existing General Plan land use designation for the Project Site is Commercial, and the existing zoning for the site is C-1 (Limited Business). Surrounding Land Uses: Land uses in the vicinity of the Project Site include the existing Park Plaza Senior Living Community (mentioned previously), medical uses, and condominiums to the south; the Holy Family Cathedral Church and School, W. La Veta Avenue, and a mix of single-family residential, multi-family residential, and commercial uses to the north; residential uses to the west; and single-family residential, multi-family residential, and park uses to the east. Most structures within proximity to the Project Site are one to two stories in height. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project includes demolition and removal of the existing restaurant building and surface parking lot from the Project Site and development of the site with a two-story 30,113-square-foot memory care facility that is associated with the existing Park Plaza Senior Care Community located adjacent to the south.1 The purpose of the facility would be to provide care for residents affected by Alzheimer’s and/or other dementia related issues. The proposed care facility would include 36 beds in 28 studio units and 4 (shared) 2-bedroom units. The maximum height of the building would be 32 feet. Project plans are shown on Figures 3 through 13. The first floor would be 15,126 square feet and would include 15 units and commons, administration, circulation, and support uses. The second floor would be 15,021 square feet and would include 17 units and commons, administration, circulation, and support uses. A courtyard and covered patio would be provided on the ground level, and a covered terrace would be provided on the second floor. Vehicle access would be provided via one driveway located in the same location as the existing driveway, at the northern edge of the Project Site on S. Glassell Street. American’s With Disabilities Act (ADA) surface parking (2 spaces) would be provided near the northeast corner of the Project Site with the primary surface vehicle parking provided at the rear (west) of the building and would include 13 spaces. The driveway along the northern edge of the Project Site would provide adequate access for the fire/emergency and trash pick-up access. A loading area would be maintained at the rear (west) of the building. 1 Although the proposed memory care facility would be associated with the existing Park Plaza Senior Care Community, the facility would be a stand-alone facility. Page 5 Discretionary Actions To allow for implementation of the Project, the Project Applicant is requesting approval of the following discretionary actions from the City: • Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for development and operation of a memory care facility; • Major Site Plan Review • Design Review • Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (Responsible or Trustee Agencies): None. Scheduled Public Meetings or Hearings: Meeting: Design Review Committee Date: March 20, 2020 Figure 3Overall Site PlanSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 4Fire Master PlanSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 5Ground Floor PlanSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 6Second Floor PlanSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 7Roof PlanSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 8Typical Unit PlanSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 9Building SectionsSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 10North and East Exterior ElevationsSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 11South and West Exterior ElevationsSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 12PerspectivesSource: Shelter Architects, 2019. Figure 13 Materials and Color Boards Source: Shelter Architects, 2019. 2. Exterior Cement Plaster Color 2 Light Brown 1. Exterior Cement Plaster Color 1 White 3. Cementitious Board Siding Accent Color 4. Cultured Stone Veneer 5. Aluminum Storefront Window Frames, Vinyl Window Color, Sim12345 Page 17 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: 1. I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 2. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. R 3. I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 4. I find that the proposed project may have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact” on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 5. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Name, Title Date Page 18 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analyses may be cross-referenced, as discussed below). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identity the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Page 19 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? R (b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings, within a scenic highway? R (c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning or other regulations governing scenic quality? R (d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Scenic vistas have been identified in the Natural Resources Element of the City’s General Plan in the eastern portion of the City, where topography and open space allow far reaching views of undeveloped hillsides, ridgelines, and open space areas. The Project Site is located in the southwestern portion of the City in an already developed and urbanized area. Views in the vicinity of the Project Site are largely constrained by existing development, landscaping, and topography. No scenic vistas are available from near the Project Site. Thus, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings, within a scenic highway? No rock outcroppings are located on the Project Site. As discussed in detail in response to Checklist Question 4(a) (Cultural Resources – Historic Resources), the restaurant building on the Project Site is not a significant historic resource under CEQA. A City-designated historic tree is located adjacent to the Project Site to the northeast. As discussed in detail below in response to Checklist Question 4(e) (Biological Resources – Tree Preservation), the tree would be protected in place and with Mitigation Meausures BIO- Page 20 2 and BIO-3, impacts related to preservation of this tree would be less than significant. The Project Site is located on Glassell Street, which is a thoroughfare and entrance into the City’s Old Towne Historic District. The Project Site is located adjacent to but outside of the Old Towne Historic District. Also, the site is located across Glassell Street and north of Hart Park, which is a City-designated historic resource. However, the Project would not include any direct or indirect modifications to the Old Towne Historic District or Hart Park. Additionally, the Project Site and surrounding properties (including the historic tree, Old Towne Historic District boundary near the Project Site, and Hart Park) are not visible from the nearest designated scenic highway (i.e., Santiago Canyon Road), which is approximately 5 miles away from the Project Site to the northeast. Thus, the Project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings, within a scenic highway. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning or other regulations governing scenic quality? The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City and is currently developed with a restaurant building, surface parking, and ornamental landscaping. As discussed in response to Checklist Question 4(a) (Cultural Resources – Historical Resources), the existing restaurant building on the Project Site (constructed in 1962) is not considered a significant historical resource under CEQA. The Project Site, while not located within the boundaries of the Old Towne Historic District, is directly across the street from structures within the Old Towne Historic District. Also, Hart Park, across the street and just to the south, is located within the boundaries of the Old Towne Historic District. The Project Site containing the restaurant building was initially developed at a time when the surrounding neighborhood was already in transition. In the 1960s, along Glassell Street, there were single-family residences and institutional buildings and sites, such as the Holy Family Cathedral School and Hart Park, that were built in the 1930s, and still extant orange groves to the west of the Project Site. In the mid-century, as the local population boomed, new infill, single-family residences were constructed among existing homes. By the late 1960s, Glassell Street became a major thoroughfare to on-ramps for the new Garden Grove Freeway (State Route 22). Since that time, the Project Site area has continued to evolve. Historic aerial photographs reveal that the neighborhood in which the Project Site is located underwent substantial redevelopment between the 1960s and 1990s. By 1986, a multi-story senior-living community residence was built adjacent to the south of the Project Site on the previous site of a miniature golf course that had been associated with the restaurant building on the Project Site. All of this development contributed to a change in character within the immediate neighborhood. Page 21 While modern in appearance, the Project is designed to blend visually into the setting of this transitional neighborhood and still provide a glimpse back to what the Project Site area once was. The proposed building has not been designed to replicate any historic building type, but has instead been designed to complement the surrounding neighborhood in mass, scale, appearance and material type. The two-story scale of the building is in keeping with the many buildings in the nearby Old Towne Historic District. Additionally, the use of materials such as plaster, stone and siding can be found on structures throughout the surrounding areas, and the use of aluminum storefront and entry canopy compliments the many buildings within The Plaza. The locally designated historic tree located adjacent to the Project Site would be protected and preserved and would provide additional visual connection to the remaining historic elements such as Hart Park and the nearby Old Towne Historic District. The Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation Element of the City’s General Plan describes that part of the overall vision for the future of the City requires that “[t]he City will build upon existing assets to create a living, active, and diverse environment that compliments all lifestyles and enhances neighborhoods, without compromising the valued resources that make Orange unique.” Additionally, one of the stated goals of the Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation Element is to protect neighborhood character. The Project’s design, as proposed, would achieve both these goals. The existing zoning for the Project Site is C-1 (Limited Business), which allows development and operation of a memory care facility on the Project Site with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), as is being requested by the Project Applicant. At a height of 32 feet and two stories, the proposed building is consistent with the heights of the buildings located adjacent to the Project Site to the south and north. Additionally, because the Project would be associated with the existing senior living facility to the south of the Project Site, the Project would complement the surrounding area more than the existing restaurant building. Further, the Project would be subject to the City’s Design Review process, which would ensure that the Project would comply with the City’s applicable design standards. Thus, the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning or other regulations governing scenic quality. Therefore, Project impacts related to scenic quality regulations would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The Project Site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized area of the City. The Project Site and surrounding area contain numerous sources of nighttime lighting, including streetlights, security lighting, illuminated signage, indoor building illumination (light emanating from the interior of structures that passes through windows), and automobile headlights. Glare is a common phenomenon in the Southern California area due mainly to the occurrence of a high number of days per year with direct sunlight and the highly- urbanized nature of the region, which results in a large concentration of potentially reflective surfaces. Page 22 Potentially reflective surfaces introduced by the Project include new windows at the Project Site and vehicles belonging to Project residents and visitors that are parked on or adjacent to the Project Site. The Project would create additional sources of light and glare at the Project Site by removing the existing restaurant building from the Project Site and development the site with a memory care facility, which would have more lighting fixtures and windows than does the existing restaurant building. However, the Project’s exterior lighting shall be directed and controlled in a manner as to prevent glare and direct illumination on to public sidewalks or thoroughfares, as required pursuant to the Orange Municipal Code Section 17.12.030.A, to the maximum extent feasible. While the Project would increase ambient light levels in the vicinity, this increase would not be substantial. All outdoor lighting from the Project would be concealed such that it would not be visible from public view due to controlled placement of lights and proposed shielding on the light fixtures, to the maximum extent feasible. In addition, the Project Site is located in an urbanized location that is already illuminated at night and the Project would be compatible with surrounding uses. Further, all glass incorporated into building facades would be either low-reflectivity or have a non- glare coating, and buildings would be constructed with materials that have minimal potential for generating glare. With compliance with the Orange Municipal Code, the Project would limit reflective surface areas and reflectivity of architectural materials. Thus, the Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Therefore, Project impacts related to light and glare would be less than significant. Page 23 2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project, and the Forest Legacy Assessment project, and forest carbon measurement mythology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? R (b) Conflict the existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? R (c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? R (d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? R (e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? R Page 24 Impact Analysis (a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Important Farmland is located at the following locations in the City: • 15 acres at the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Jamboree Road; • 18 acres north of East Taft Avenue and east of SR-55; and • 8 acres east of Meats Avenue and north of the City of Villa Park. These locations are at the northern and eastern areas of the City and are not near the Project Site. No agricultural are located on or near the Project Site. Thus, the Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural uses. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? The Williamson Act of 1965 allows local governments to enter into contract agreements with local landowners with the purpose of trying to limit specific parcels of land to agricultural or other related open space use.2 The Project Site and surrounding areas are urbanized and are not subject to a Williamson Act Contract. The Project Site is zoned Limited Business and is not zoned for agricultural use. Thus, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 2 State of California Department of Conservation, Williamson Act Program, website: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dirp/lca/Pages/index.aspx, accessed June 2019. Page 25 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? The Project Site is zoned Limited Business and is not zoned for forest land or timberland. The Project Site and surrounding areas are urbanized and do not contain any timberland. Thus, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g)). Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The Project Site and surrounding areas are urbanized and do not contain forest land. Thus, the Project would not result in the loss of forest land. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The Project Site and surrounding areas are urbanized and do not contain farmland or forest land. Thus, the Project would not result in the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or forest land to non-forest use. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. As with the Project, none of the cumulative projects is located on agricultural land or forest land. Thus, no cumulative impacts related to agricultural resources would occur. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Page 26 Cumulative Impacts As discussed previously in response to Checklist Question 1(a) (Aesthetics – Scenic Vistas), there are no scenic vistas available from locations near the Project Site. As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. The only cumulative project that is within visual proximity of the Project Site is Cumulative Project #2, which includes development of 7 single- family homes. Because there are no scenic vistas available from the Project Site area, no cumulative impacts related to scenic vistas would occur. The degree to which any of the cumulative projects could result in impact to scenic resources would be gauged by the City on a project-by-project basis. However, there are no shared scenic resources among the cumulative projects and the Project. Cumulative Project #2 would be developed within a residential neighborhood and would compatible with the existing surrounding neighborhood. Project impacts related to visual character were found to be less than significant Thus, cumulative visual character impacts would be less than significant. All of the sites of the cumulative projects are located in an urbanized area of the City and contain existing sources of light and glare. All of the cumulative projects would be required to comply with the City’s requirements related to lighting and window material. For these reasons, cumulative impacts related to aesthetics would be less than significant. Page 27 3. AIR QUALITY. The significance criteria established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Management Plan? R (b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the air basin is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? R (c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? R (d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? R Impact Analysis This analysis in this section is based primarily on the following (refer to Appendix A): • Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Modeling, NT Environmental Consulting, July 2019. Regulatory Framework Federal Clean Air Act The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years, with the most recent amendments occurring in 1990. At the federal level, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is responsible for implementing some portions of the CAA (e.g., certain mobile source and other requirements). Other portions of the CAA (e.g., stationary source requirements) are implemented by state and local agencies. In California, the CCAA is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) at the state level and by the air quality management districts and air pollution control districts at the regional and local levels. The 1990 amendments to the CAA identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). These amendments require both a demonstration of reasonable further progress towards attainment and the incorporation of additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. NAAQS have been established for seven major air pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), PM2.5 (particulate matter, 2.5 microns), PM10 (particulate matter, 10 microns), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead (Pb). Page 28 The CAA requires USEPA to designate areas as attainment, nonattainment, or maintenance (previously nonattainment and currently attainment) for each criteria pollutant based on whether the NAAQS have been achieved. The federal standards are shown on Table 1. USEPA has classified the Orange County portion of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) as a nonattainment area for O3 and PM2.5. State California Clear Air Act In addition to being subject to the requirements of the CAA, air quality in California is also governed by more stringent regulations under the California Clear Air Act (CCAA). In California the CCAA is administered by CARB at the state level and by the air quality management districts and air pollution control districts at the regional and local levels. CARB, which became part of the California Environmental Protection Agency in 1991, is responsible for meeting the state requirements of the CAA, administering the CCAA, and establishing the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The CCAA, as amended in 1992, requires all air districts in the state to achieve and maintain the CAAQS. CAAQS are generally more stringent than their corresponding NAAQS and incorporate additional standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility-reducing particles. The CCAA requires CARB to designate areas within California as either attainment or nonattainment for each criteria pollutant based on whether the CAAQS thresholds have been achieved. Under the CCAA, areas are designated as nonattainment for a pollutant if air quality data shows that a state standard for the pollutant was violated at least once during the previous three calendar years. Exceedances that are affected by highly irregular or infrequent events are not considered violations of a state standard and are not used as a basis for designating areas as nonattainment. Under the CCAA, the non-desert Orange County portion of the Basin is designated as a nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. The state standards and attainment/non-attainment are also shown above on Table 1. California Air Toxics Program CARB’s Air Toxics Program was established in 1983 in response to the adoption of AB 1807, the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act. AB 1807 directs CARB and the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to identify toxic air contaminants (TACs) and determine whether any regulatory action is necessary to reduce their risks to public health. Substances formally identified as TACs include diesel particulate matter and environmental tobacco smoke. Page 29 Table 1 State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment for Orange County Pollutant Averaging Period California Federal Standard Attainment Status Standard Attainment Status Ozone – O3 1-hour 0.09 ppm (180 µg/m3) Non- attainment - - 8-hour 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) Non- attainment 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) Non- attainment Respirable Particulate Matter – PM10 24-hour 50 µg/m3 Non- attainment 150 µg/m3 Maintenance Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 µg/m3 Non- attainment - - Fine Particulate Matter – PM2.5 24-hour - - 35 µg/m3 Non- attainment 8-hour 12 µg/m3 Non- attainment 12 µg/m3 Non- attainment Carbon Monoxide – CO 1-hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m3) Attainment 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) Maintenance 8-hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) Attainment 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) Maintenance Nitrogen Dioxide – NO2 1-hour 0.18 ppm (338 µg/m3) Attainment 100 ppb (188 µg/m3) Maintenance Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 ppm (57 µg/m3) Attainment 53 ppb (100 µg/m3) Maintenance Sulfur Dioxide – SO2 1-hour 0.25 ppm (655 µg/m3) Attainment 75 ppb (196 µg/m3) Attainment 24-hour 0.04 ppm (105 µg/m3) Attainment - - Lead – Pb 30-day average 1.5 µg/m3 Attainment - - Calendar Quarter - - 0.15 µg/m3 Attainment Source: CARB, Area Designations Maps/State and National, www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed July 29, 2019. Page 30 Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective Released by CARB in 2005, the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective provides recommendations regarding the siting of new sensitive land uses near potential sources of TACs (e.g., freeways, distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gas stations), as well as the siting of new TAC sources in proximity to existing sensitive land uses.3 The recommendations are advisory and should not necessarily be interpreted as defined “buffer zones”; if a project or sensitive land uses are within the siting distance, CARB recommends further analysis. Regional South Coast Air Quality Management District The Project is located within the 6,745-square-mile Basin. The Basin includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. It is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west; the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east; and the San Diego County line to the south. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the agency principally responsible for air pollution control in the Basin. Specifically, SCAQMD is responsible for planning, implementing, and enforcing programs designed to attain and maintain CAAQS established by CARB and NAAQS established by the USEPA. All projects in the SCAQMD jurisdiction are subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the following: • Rule 401 Visible Emissions: This rule prohibits air discharge that results in a plume that is as dark as or darker than what is designed as No. 1 Ringelmann Chart by the United States Bureau of Mines for an aggregate of three minutes in any one hour. • Rule 402 Nuisance: This rule prohibits the discharge of “such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of people or the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.” • Rule 403 Fugitive Dust: This rule mandates that projects reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce, or mitigate fugitive dust emissions from any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area. 2016 Air Quality Management Plan The 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) was adopted in April 2017 and represents the most updated regional blueprint for achieving federal air quality standards. It relies on emissions forecasts based 3 CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook, A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. Page 31 on demographic and economic growth projections provided by the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016- 2040 RTP/SCS). Southern California Association of Governments SCAG is the regional planning agency for Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties that is tasked with addressing regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development, and the environment. As the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the six-county Southern California region, SCAG is required by law to ensure that transportation activities conform to, and are supportive of, regional and state air quality plan goals to attain NAAQS. Additionally, SCAG is a co-producer, with the SCAQMD, of the transportation strategy and transportation control measure sections of the Basin’s AQMP. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS recognizes that transportation investments and future land use patterns are inextricably linked, and that continued recognition of this close relationship will help the region make choices that sustain existing resources and expand efficiency, mobility, and accessibility for people across the region. In particular, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS draws a closer connection between where people live and work, and it offers a blueprint for how Southern California can grow more sustainably. Local City of Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element The City of Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element identifies policies and strategies for preserving air quality within the City, and it acknowledges the interrelationships among transportation and land use planning in meeting the City’s mobility and air quality goals. However, the goals and policies of the Natural Resources Element mainly direct and guide City action and would have limited to no applicability to the Project, which is a private land use development. Pollutants and Effects State and Federal Criteria Pollutants Air quality is measured by the ambient air concentrations of seven pollutants that have been identified by the USEPA due to their potentially harmful effects on public health and the environment. These “criteria air pollutants” include CO, ground-level O3, NO2, SO2, PM10 or less in diameter, PM2.5 microns or less in diameter, and Pb. The descriptions of each criteria air pollutant below and their health effects are based on information provided by the USEPA and the SCAQMD.4,5 4 USEPA, Criteria Air Pollutants, www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants. 5 SCAQMD, Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, February 2013. Page 32 Carbon Monoxide – CO CO is a colorless and odorless gas that is released when something is burned. Outdoors, the greatest sources of CO are cars, trucks, and other vehicles or machinery that burn fossil fuels. Unvented kerosene and gas space heaters, leaking chimneys and furnaces, and gas stoves can release CO and affect air quality indoors. Breathing air with elevated concentrations of CO reduces the amount of oxygen that can be transported via the blood stream and can lead to weakened heart contractions; as a result, CO inhalation can be particularly harmful to people with chronic heart disease. At moderate concentrations, CO inhalation can cause nausea, dizziness, and headaches. High concentrations of CO may be fatal. However, such conditions are not likely to occur outdoors. Ozone – O3 O3 is a colorless gas that is formed when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) undergo slow photochemical reactions in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight. The greatest source of VOC and NOX emissions is automobile exhaust. O3 concentrations are generally highest during the summer months when direct sunlight, light wind, and warm temperatures are favorable to its formation. Elevated levels of O3 irritate the lungs and airways and may cause throat and chest pain, as well as coughing, thereby increasing susceptibility to respiratory infections and reducing the ability to exercise. Effects are more severe in people with asthma and other respiratory ailments. Long-term exposure may lead to the scarring of lung tissue and reduced lung efficiency. Nitrogen Dioxide – NO2 NO2 is primarily a byproduct of fossil fuel combustion and is therefore emitted by automobiles, power plants, and industrial facilities. The principal form of nitrogen oxide produced by fossil fuel combustion is nitric oxide (NO), which reacts quickly to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2 commonly called NOX. NO2 absorbs blue light and results in reduced visibility and a brownish-red cast to the atmosphere. NO2 also contributes to the formation of PM10. Nitrogen oxides irritate the nose and throat and increase susceptibility to respiratory infections, especially in people with asthma. Longer exposures to elevated concentrations of NO2 may even contribute to the development of asthma. The principal concern of NOX is as a precursor to the formation of O3. Sulfur Dioxide – SO2 Sulfur oxides (SOX) are compounds of sulfur and oxygen molecules. SO2 is the pre-dominant form found in the lower atmosphere and is a product of burning sulfur or sulfur-containing materials. Major sources of SO2 include power plants, large industrial facilities, diesel vehicles, and oil-burning residential heaters. SO2 may aggravate lung diseases, especially bronchitis. It also constricts breathing passages, especially in asthmatics and people involved in moderate to heavy exercise. SO2 may cause wheezing, shortness of breath, and coughing. High levels of particulates appear to worsen the effect of SO2, and long-term exposure to both pollutants leads to higher rates of respiratory illnesses. Page 33 Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) The human body naturally prevents the entry of larger particles into itself. However, smaller particles less than 10 microns (PM10) or even less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) in diameter can enter the body and become trapped in the nose, throat, and upper respiratory tract. Here, these particulates may aggravate existing heart and lung diseases, affect the body’s defenses against inhaled materials, and damage lung tissue. Those most sensitive to PM10 and PM2.5 include children, the elderly, and those with chronic lung and/or heart disease. Lead – Pb Airborne lead is emitted from industrial facilities and from the sanding or removal of old lead-based paint. Smelting and other metal processing activities are the primary sources of Pb emissions. Pb effects most commonly encountered in current populations are neurological effects in children and cardiovascular effects in adults (e.g., high blood pressure and heart disease). Infants and young children are especially sensitive to even low levels of Pb, which may contribute to behavioral problems, learning deficits, and lowered IQ. Toxic Air Contaminants - TACs TACs refer to a diverse group of “non-criteria” air pollutants that can affect human health but have not had ambient air quality standards established for them. This is not because they are fundamentally different from the pollutants discussed above, but because their effects tend to be local rather than regional. As discussed earlier, CARB and OEHHA determine if a substance should be formally identified, or “listed,” as a TAC in California. A complete list of these substances is maintained on CARB’s website.6 One key TAC is diesel particulate matter (diesel PM), which is emitted in diesel engine exhaust. Released in May 2015 by the SCAQMD, the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin Final Report (Mates IV) determined that about 90 percent of the carcinogenic risk from air toxics in the Basin is attributable to mobile source emissions. Of the three carcinogenic TACs that constitute the majority of the known health risk from motor vehicle traffic – diesel PM from primarily trucks, and benzene and 1,3- butadiene from passenger vehicles – diesel PM represents the majority of the potential cancer risk from vehicle traffic.7 Overall, diesel PM was found to account for, on average, about 68 percent of the air toxics risk in the Basin.8 6 CARB, Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List, www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm, last reviewed by CARB July 18, 2011. 7 CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. 8 SCAQMD, Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin (MATES IV), May 2015. Page 34 Volatile Organic Compounds - VOCs VOCs are typically formed from the combustion of fuels and/or released through the evaporation of organic liquids. Some VOCs are also classified by the state as toxic air contaminants, though there are no VOC- specific ambient air quality standards. Once emitted, VOCs can mix in the air with other pollutants (e.g. NOX, CO, SO2, etc.) and contribute to the formation of photochemical smog. Existing Conditions As discussed earlier, the Project Site is located within the 6,745-square-mile Basin that includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Air quality within the Basin is influenced by a wide range of emissions sources, such as dense population centers, heavy vehicular traffic, and industry. These sources in addition to the topography and climate of Southern California combine to make the Basin an area of high air pollution potential. The USEPA has classified Orange County as a nonattainment area for O3 and PM2.5, meaning that this portion of the Basin does not meet NAAQS for these pollutants. Additionally, the Orange County portion of the Basin also does not meet CAAQS for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. Table 1 summarizes CAAQS and NAAQS and the attainment status for Orange County with respect to each criteria pollutant. Air Quality Monitoring Data The SCAQMD monitors air quality conditions at 38 source receptor areas (SRA) throughout the Basin. The Project Site is located in SCAQMD’s SRA No. 17, “Central Orange County.” Table 2 shows pollutant levels, State and federal standards, and the number of exceedances recorded in SRA No. 17 from 2016 through 2018. The one-hour State standard for O3 was exceeded three times during this three-year period and the federal standard was exceeded nine times. The 24-hour State standard for PM10 was exceeded 33 times. The 24-hour federal standard for PM2.5 was exceeded ten times. CO and NO2 levels did not exceed their respective CAAQS or NAAQS during this period. SO2, and lead pollutant data is not available for SRA No. 8. Page 35 Table 2 Ambient Air Quality Data – SRA No.17 “Central Orange County” Pollutants and State and Federal Standards Maximum Concentrations and Frequencies of State/Federal Standards Exceedance 2016 2017 2018 Ozone – O3 Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 0.103 0.090 0.112 Days > 0.09 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 2 0 1 Days > 0.070 ppm (Federal 8-hour standard) 4 4 1 Carbon Monoxide – CO Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 2.6 2.5 2.3 Days > 20 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 0 0 0 Maximum 8-hour Concentration (ppm) 2.1 2.1 1.9 Days > 9.0 ppm (State 8-hour standard) 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide – NO2 Maximum 1-hour Concentration (ppm) 0.0643 0.0812 0.0660 Days > 0.18 ppm (State 1-hour standard) 0 0 0 PM10 Maximum 24-hour Concentration (µm/m3) 74 128 129 Days > 50 µg/m3 (State 24-hour standard) 3 17 13 PM2.5 Maximum 24-hour Concentration (µg/m3) 44.45 53.90 54.10 Days > 35 µg/m3 (Federal 24-hour standard) 1 6 3 Sulfur Dioxide – SO2 Maximum 24-hour Concentration (ppb) N/A N/A N/A Days > 0.04 ppm (State 24-hour standard) N/A N/A N/A ppm = parts per million of air, by volume µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter N/A = not available at this monitoring station. Source: SCAQMD Historical Data by Year, www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-studies/historical- data-by-year. Accessed July 29, 2019. Existing Health Risk Based on the MATES IV model, the calculated cancer risk in the Project Site area is approximately 944 in a million.9 In general the risk near the Project Site is comparable to, if slightly below, other urbanized areas in Orange County. 9 SCAQMD, Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin (MATES IV), MATES IV Interactive Carcinogenicity Map. Page 36 The OEHHA, on behalf of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), provides a screening tool called CalEnvironScreen that may be used to identify California communities that are disproportionately burdened by, and vulnerable to, multiple sources of pollution. According to CalEnviroScreen 3.0, the Project’s census tract is ranked 45th to 50th percentile, which means that the Project Site’s pollution burden is relatively average in comparison to other communities within California. Sensitive Receptors Some land uses are considered more sensitive to changes in air quality than others, depending on the population groups and the activities involved. Generally speaking, sensitive land uses, or sensitive receptors, are those where sensitive individuals are most likely to spend time. Individuals most susceptible to poor air quality include children, the elderly, athletes, and those with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. As a result, sensitive receptors to air quality may include schools (i.e., elementary schools or high schools), childcare centers, parks and playgrounds, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation facilities, convalescent facilities, retirement facilities, residences, and athletic facilities. Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the Project Site include, but are not limited to, the following: • Holy Family Cathedral Residences: This receptor consists of residential land uses for the church’s on- site religious faculty (e.g. convents, rectory, etc.). The residential building that is nearest to the Project, “Cathedral House,” is approximately 15 feet north of the Project Site at 566 S. Glassell Street. • Holy Family Cathedral School: This school receptor is located at 530 S. Glassell Street and consists of sensitive classroom buildings as well as various outdoor recreational/athletic facilities. The nearest classroom building is approximately 200 feet to the north. The nearest outdoor facility is a grass field located directly west of the Project Site. Other outdoor plays areas are located at least 150 feet to the west. • Glassell Street Residences: This receptor consists of residential land uses located along Glassell Street, approximately 95 feet east of the Project Site across Glassell Street. • Fashion Park Street Residences: This receptor consists of residential land uses located along Fashion Park Street, approximately 350 feet west of the Project Site. • Park Plaza Assisted Living Facility: This receptor includes the existing Park Plaza assisted living facilities that are located directly south of the Project Site. • Hart Park: This park contains various outdoor athletic and recreational facilities. It is located approximately 200 feet southeast of the Project Site. https://scaqmdonline.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=470c30bc6daf4ef6a43f0082973ff45f Accessed July 29, 2019. Page 37 Existing Project Site Emissions The Project Site currently contains a 5,959-square-foot restaurant building and its related surface parking. As the restaurant is no longer operational (as of December 31, 2018), the site contains no active uses and likely generates nominal, if any, anthropogenic air emissions from area, energy, mobile, or other sources. Nevertheless, emissions associated with this former use were estimated for comparison purposes and are shown on Table 3. Table 3 Existing Project Site Daily Operations Emissions Emissions Source Emissions in lbs per day VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Area <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile Sources 1 4 13 <1 4 1 Net Regional Total 1 5 14 <1 4 1 Source: NTEC, 2019, based on CalEEMod 2016.3.2 model runs. Project Impacts Methodology The analysis below focuses on the potential change in air quality conditions that could result from the Project’s construction- and operations-related air pollutant emissions. Specific methodologies used to evaluate these emissions are discussed below. Construction Construction of the Project could affect local and regional air quality due to the use of heavy-duty gasoline and diesel-powered construction equipment, as well as the generation of construction vehicle trips. Demolition, grading, and site preparation activities would also result in fugitive dust emissions. It is important to consider that construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day depending on levels of construction activity, the specific types of construction activities taking place and vehicles/equipment in use, and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. Based on the criteria set forth in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, a project would have the potential to violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing violation and result in a significant impact with regard to construction emissions if its regional emissions from both direct and indirect construction sources would exceed the threshold levels shown on Table 3. SCAQMD localized significance thresholds (LSTs) are also included below on Table 4. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that would not be expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards. They are developed based on Page 38 the ambient concentrations of a given pollutant for a source receptor and distances to the nearest sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD provides LSTs for NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD does not provide a LST for SO2 because land use development projects typically result in negligible construction and long- term operational emissions of this pollutant. Additionally, because VOCs are not a criteria pollutant, there is no ambient standard or SCAQMD LST for VOCs. However, due to the role that VOCs play in O3 formation and their classification as a precursor pollutant, a regional emissions threshold has been established. LSTs for the Project were obtained via the SCAQMD’s mass rate look-up tables, which are used to determine whether or not a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts. Table 4 SCAQMD Construction Emissions Thresholds Criteria Pollutant Construction Emissions (lbs per day) Regional LocalizedA Volatile Organic Compounds – VOCs 75 - Nitrogen Oxides - NOX 100 81 Carbon Monoxide – CO 550 485 Sulfur Oxides - SOX 150 - Respirable Particulates – PM10 150 4 Fine Particulates – PM2.5 55 3 A Localized significance thresholds assumed a 1-acre and 25-meter (82-foot) receptor distance, which are the smallest site and shortest distance used for analysis in the LST guidance document. The SCAQMD has not developed LST values for VOC or SOX. The Project is located in SRA No. 17, “Central Orange County.” Sources: SCAQMD, Air Quality Significance Thresholds, revised April 2019; and, SCAQMD, LST Methodology Appendix C – Mass Rate LST Look-Up Table, October 2009. The Project’s construction-related emissions were estimated using SCAQMD’s CalEEMod 2016.3.2 model. Modeling results are included in Appendix A. The analysis assumes that all construction activities would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust, as is mandatory for all construction projects in the Basin. Operations The SCAQMD has also established significance thresholds to evaluate potential impacts associated with long-term project operations. Regional thresholds and LSTs for Project operations are shown on Table 5. Operational emissions for the Project were also calculated using CalEEMod 2016.3.2. Page 39 Table 5 SCAQMD Operational Emissions Thresholds Criteria Pollutant Operational Emissions (lbs per day) Regional LocalizedA Volatile Organic Compounds - VOCs 55 - Nitrogen Oxides - NOX 55 81 Carbon Monoxide – CO 550 485 Sulfur Oxides - SOX 150 - Respirable Particulates – PM10 150 1 Fine Particulates – PM2.5 55 1 A Localized significance thresholds assumed a 1-acre and 25-meter (82-foot) receptor distance, which are the smallest site and shortest distance used for analysis in the LST guidance document. The SCAQMD has not developed LST values for VOC or SOX. The Project is located in SRA No. 17, “Central Orange County.” Sources: SCAQMD, Air Quality Significance Thresholds, revised April 2019; and, SCAQMD, LST Methodology Appendix C – Mass Rate LST Look-Up Table, October 2009. TACs (Construction and Operations) Potential TAC impacts are evaluated by conducting a qualitative analysis consistent with the CARB Handbook, followed by a more detailed analysis (i.e., dispersion modeling), as necessary. The qualitative analysis consists of reviewing the Project to identify any new or modified TAC emissions sources. If the qualitative evaluation does not rule out significant impacts from a new source, or modification of an existing TAC emissions source, a more detailed analysis is conducted. (a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Management Plan? The analysis below assesses the Project’s consistency with the SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP and SCAG’s 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. As discussed earlier, the 2016 AQMP’s projections for achieving State and federal air quality goals are based on population, housing, and employment trend assumptions in SCAG’s 2016- 2040 RTP/SCS, which are themselves largely based on local growth forecasts from local government; therefore, a project is consistent with the 2016 AQMP, in part, if it is consistent with the population, housing, and employment assumptions and smart growth policies that were used in the formation of the AQMP. The Project’s development of a 36-bed memory care/assisted living facility would not exceed the growth assumptions of the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. The Project Site is designated C1 (Limited Business) by the local zoning ordinance, a designation which permits senior housing and similar uses. As such, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS’s growth assumptions for the City accommodate the proposed use on the Project Site. Development of the Project would also be consistent with the smart growth policies of the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS to increase housing and employment density within close proximity to HQTAs. Though the Page 40 Project Site is not currently located within a HQTA, the Project Site is in an area that is at the forefront of an emerging HQTA, projected to encompass the Project Site area by 2040, according to the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) 59 bus route, which includes stops within 350 feet of the Project Site, provides service generally along the Glassell Street/Grand Avenue corridor between University of California Irvine and Anaheim. This line provides direct service to the Orange Transportation Center and Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, both of which are Metrolink stations and major hubs for local and regional bus lines. The OCTA 59 bus route has approximately a 25-minute service frequency during peak commute hours. The Project Site is also located approximately 3,500 feet southwest of the Orange Transportation Center. As such, though the Project Site’s location does not currently meet the definitions of a HQTA, it is nevertheless located within close proximity to a HQTA and is projected to be located within a HQTA by 2040. To summarize the analysis in response to Checklist Question 3(a): (1) Project-related growth would be consistent with 2016 AQMP projections that are themselves based on 2016-2040 RTP/SCS projections; (2) the Project Site’s location near a HQTA that is projected to encompass the Project Site by 2040 would be consistent with the latest regional land use planning strategies to reduce VMT and associated air emissions; and (3) as discussed in response to Checklist Question 3(b) (Air Quality – Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in Criteria Pollutants), pollutant emissions associated with the Project’s construction and operations would not exceed or contribute to any exceedance of ambient air quality standards and thresholds, nor would they interfere with the AQMP’s attainment of air quality standards or interim emissions reductions. As a result, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of any applicable air quality plans. Therefore, Project impacts related to AQMP consistency would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the air basin is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? The Project would contribute to local and regional air pollutant emissions during its construction (short- term) and operations (long-term). However, as discussed in the analysis below, construction and operation of the Project would not result in exceedances of SCAQMD daily thresholds for project-specific impacts that could subsequently cause cumulatively considerable increases in emissions of pollutants for which the Basin is designated as non-attainment. Construction Emissions Construction of the Project is anticipated to take approximately 17 months. During this time, a variety of heavy-duty diesel-powered vehicles and equipment would be operated on-site. Demolition of the existing site uses would likely require an excavator, as well as a loader, bulldozer, or another similar grading vehicle. Grading for the Project would require similar vehicles, as well as a grader. During the demolition and Page 41 excavation phases, haul trucks would be utilized to transport demolished materials and any cut soils to a nearby landfill. The building construction phase could require vehicles such as a forklift and a crane or truck-mounted crane. Table 6 summarizes the potential construction schedule that was used to model the Project’s air quality impacts. Table 6 Approximate Construction Schedule Phase Duration Demolition and Site Preparation 1.5 months Grading 1.5 months Building Construction 14 months Architectural Coatings 2 monthsA A The application of architectural coatings would overlap with building construction. The Project’s daily regional and local emissions from construction, as estimated using SCAQMD’s CalEEMod 2016.3.2 model, are shown on Table 7. Regional thresholds and LSTs for each air pollutant are also shown for comparison. As shown, the Project’s unmitigated regional construction emissions would not exceed SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, or PM2.5. Local emissions also would not exceed SCAQMD LSTs for NOX, CO, PM10, or PM2.5. As a result, the Project’s construction emissions impacts related to regional and localized air quality would be less than significant. Table 7 Regional and Localized Construction Emissions Emissions in lbs per day VOC NOX CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Regional Emissions 2020 2 16 13 <1 2 1 2021 2 14 15 <1 1 1 Maximum Regional Emissions 2 16 15 <1 2 1 Regional Daily Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Localized Emissions 2020 1 16 12 <1 1 1 2021 1 11 11 <1 1 1 Maximum Localized Emissions 1 16 12 <1 1 1 Localized Significance Threshold - 81 485 - 4 3 Exceed Threshold? - No No - No No Source: NTEC, 2019, based on CalEEMod 2016.3.2 model runs. LST analysis based on 1-acre site with 25-meter distances to receptors in SRA No. 17, “Central Orange County.” Page 42 Operational Emissions Emissions associated with the Project’s operation were also calculated using CalEEMod 2016.3.2. As shown on Table 8, the Project would not introduce any new major sources of air pollution; emissions would not exceed SCAQMD’s regional significance thresholds for VOC, NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5, nor would they exceed SCAQMD LSTs for NOX, CO, PM10, or PM2.5. As a result, the Project’s operations emissions impacts related to regional and localized air quality would be less than significant. Table 8 Regional and Localized Operational Emissions Emissions Source Emissions in lbs per day VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Area <1 <1 3 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile Sources <1 1 4 <1 1 <1 Project Regional Emissions <1 1 6 <1 1 <1 Regional Daily Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Project Localized Emissions <1 <1 3 <1 <1 <1 Localized Significance Thresholds - 81 485 - 1 1 Exceed Threshold? - No No - No No Source: NTEC, 2019, based on CalEEMod 2016.3.2 model runs. LST analysis based on 1-acre site with 25-meter distances to receptors in SRA No. 17, “Central Orange County.” Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Construction Emissions As discussed in the response to Checklist Question 3(b) (Air Quality – Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in Criteria Pollutants), the Project’s construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s regional significance thresholds. Construction emissions also would not exceed SCAQMD LSTs, meaning that nearby sensitive receptors generally located within 25 meters of the Project would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations that would present a public health concern. The primary TAC that would be generated by construction activities is diesel PM, which would be released from the exhaust pipes of diesel-powered construction vehicles and equipment. According to SCAQMD methodology, health risks from carcinogenic air toxics such as diesel PM are usually quantified in terms of individual cancer risk. “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations Page 43 of TACs over a 30-year period will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk-assessment methodology. However, the anticipated duration of construction activities associated with the Project’s implementation is approximately 17 months, and daily diesel PM emissions would vary considerably day by day, and by phase. After the initial three months of demolition and grading, the daily on-site activities of heavy-duty diesel-powered construction vehicles would reduce substantially. No residual emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction. As a result, construction of the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial diesel PM or other pollutant concentrations. Therefore, the Project’s construction impacts related to sensitive receptors would be less than significant. Operational Emissions As also discussed in the response to Checklist Question 3(b) (Air Quality – Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in Criteria Pollutants), the Project’s operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD regional significance thresholds or LSTs. Additionally, the Project does not propose typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs such as industrial manufacturing processes, automotive repair facilities, or warehouse distribution facilities. As a result, the Project’s operations would not warrant the need for a health risk assessment, and this impact would be less than significant. Though the Project would generate traffic that produces and contributes to off-site emissions, Project traffic generation would not result in exceedances of CO air quality standards at nearby roadways due to three key factors. First, CO hotspots are rare and only occur in the presence of unusual atmospheric conditions and extremely cold conditions, neither of which applies to the Project area. Second, auto-related emissions of CO continue to decline because of advances in fuel combustion technology and the increasing penetration of this technology in the vehicle fleet. As shown on Table 2, CO levels in the Project Site area are well- below federal and state standards, as are CO levels in the Basin itself. No exceedances of CO have been recorded at nearby monitoring stations for some time, and the Basin is currently designated as a CO attainment area for both CAAQS and NAAQS. Finally, the Project would not contribute to the levels of congestion and emissions necessary to trigger a potential CO hotspot. In fact, the Project would result in a net decrease of 320 vehicle trips per day.10 Project traffic would not significantly impact any nearby intersections. Thus, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial CO concentrations as a result of CO hotspots. Therefore, the Project’s operational impacts related to sensitive receptors would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None 10 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis – Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Page 44 (d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? No other emissions, including objectionable odors, would be anticipated as a result of the construction or operations of the Project. Project construction would involve the use of conventional building materials typical to construction projects of similar type and size. Any odors that may be generated during construction would be localized and temporary in nature and would not be sufficient to affect a substantial number of people. With regard to Project operations, the Project proposes a 36-bed memory care/assisted living facility, which is not a land use frequently associated with odor complaints (e.g., agricultural uses, wastewater treatment facilities, food processing facilities, etc.). As a result, the Project would not result in other emissions, including objectionable odors, adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As discussed in response to Checklist Question 3(b) (Air Quality – Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in Criteria Pollutants), the Project would not result in cumulative considerable air quality impacts. Page 45 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? R (b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in the local or regional plans, policies, regulations by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? R (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? R (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? R (e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? R (f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project Site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized portion of the City. The Project Site is entirely developed with a restaurant building, surface parking, and ornamental landscaping, and does not contain any special status species or any habitat that would support special status species. Thus, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification, on any species Page 46 identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in the local or regional plans, policies, regulations by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project Site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized portion of the City. The Project Site is developed with a restaurant building, surface parking, and ornamental landscaping. The Project Site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. Thus, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in the local or regional plans, policies, regulations by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? The Project Site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized portion of the City. The Project Site is developed with a restaurant building, surface parking, and ornamental landscaping. The Project Site does not contain any wetlands. Thus, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Although the majority of the City is characterized by urbanized areas with low habitat value for wildlife, the City’s primary functional wildlife corridors are Santiago Creek through the center of the City; the northeastern portion of the City and the Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridors, which link with Santiago Oaks Park; preserved hillsides and ridgelines in the southeastern portion of the City that link with Page 47 Peters Canyon Park; and East Orange undeveloped areas (Irvine Ranch Land Reserve and the Orange County Central/Coastal Natural Community Conservation Planning Area [NCCP]).11 There are no NCCP Habitat Reserve, Non-Reserve Open Space, or Special Linkage designations in or around the Project Site.12 The Project Site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized portion of the City. The Project Site is developed with a restaurant building, surface parking, and ornamental landscaping. There are no waterways on or adjacent to the Project Site. The Project Site is not part of a migratory corridor and is not located near any native wildlife nursery sites. Thus, the Project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. However, as discussed in response to Checklist Question 4(e) (Biological Resources – Tree Preservation), two mature silk oak trees (Grevillea robusta), which are approximately 90 feet tall, located on the eastern portion of the Project Site would be removed as part of the Project. It is possible that birds protected by the Migratory Bird Species Act (MBTA) and the California Fish and Game Code (FGC) could use these trees for nesting/breeding. The MBTA and the FGC render it unlawful to take native breeding birds, and their nests, eggs, and young. The Project has the potential to result in direct impacts on breeding birds if construction activities occur during the bird breeding season (February 1st through September 15th) and birds are nesting within the Project Site and/or immediate vicinity at that time. Temporary direct impacts on breeding birds could occur from increased noise, vibration, and dust during construction, which could adversely affect the breeding behavior of some birds, and lead to the loss (take) of eggs and chicks or nest abandonment. For these reasons, Project construction during bird breeding season could have potentially significant impacts on nesting birds. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 includes recommendations for Project construction outside of bird breeding season (February 1st through September 15th) and precautions for construction during breeding season that include a pre-construction nesting bird survey of the site prior to the start of construction. The mitigation measure also provides recommendations if nesting birds are found on-site, including the complete avoidance of active nests until young have fledged. The implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would help to avoid, eliminate, or reduce direct impacts on breeding/nesting birds to less than significant levels. Therefore, with mitigation, Project impacts related to breeding/nesting birds would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated 11 Page 5.4-12 in City of Orange General Plan Program EIR: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR- PDF. 12 Figure 5.4-2, NCCP Habitat Reserve Area, in City of Orange General Plan Program EIR: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR- PDF. Page 48 Mitigation Measures: BIO-1: Construction during Breeding Season and Pre-construction Breeding Bird Surveys • Project activities that would remove or disturb potential nest sites shall be scheduled outside the breeding bird season, if feasible. The breeding bird nesting season is typically from February 1st through September 15th, but can vary slightly from year to year, usually depending on weather conditions. Removing all physical features that could potentially serve as nest sites outside of the breeding bird season shall be conducted to prevent birds from nesting within the Project Site during the breeding season and during construction activities. • If Project activities that would remove or disturb potential nest sites cannot be avoided during February 1st through September 15th, a qualified biologist would conduct a pre- construction clearance and nesting bird survey to search for all potential nesting areas, breeding birds, and active nests or nest sites within the limits of Project disturbance up to seven days prior to mobilization, staging and other disturbances. It shall end no more than three days prior to vegetation, substrate, and structure removal and/or disturbance. • If no breeding birds or active nests are observed during the pre-construction survey, or if they are observed and would not be disturbed, then Project activities may begin and no further mitigation would be required. • If an active bird nest is located during the pre-construction survey and potentially would be disturbed, a no-activity buffer zone shall be delineated on maps and marked (flagging or other means) up to 500 feet for special-status avian species and raptors, or 75 feet for non-special status avian species. The limits of the buffer shall be demarcated as to not provide a specific indicator of the location of the nest to predators or people. Materials used to demarcate the nests shall be removed as soon as work is complete or the fledglings have left the nest. The biologist shall determine the appropriate size of the buffer zone based on the type of activities planned near the nest and bird species, because some bird species are more tolerant than others to noise and other disturbances. Buffer zones shall not be disturbed until a qualified biologist determines that the nest is inactive. Additionally, the area shall not be disturbed until the young have fledged, the parents are no longer feeding the young, the young have left the area, or the young would no longer be impacted by Project activities. • Birds or their active nests shall not be disturbed, captured, handled or moved. Inactive nests may be moved by a qualified biologist, if necessary, to avoid disturbance by Project activities. Significance Determination After Mitgation: Less Than Significant Page 49 (e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? The analysis in this section is based in part on the following (refer to Appendix B): • Protected Tree Report, Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc., February 25, 2019. The City’s Master Street Tree Plan and the Tree Preservation Ordinance are the primary local measures to protect biological resources. The Master Street Tree Plan and the Tree Preservation Ordinance are effective procedures to monitor the potential for impacts to existing trees that provide roosting and nesting habitat for native and migratory birds throughout the City.13 Chapter 12.32 of the City’s Municipal Code establishes a Tree Preservation Program for the City, which includes the preservation of historic trees. This chapter defines historical trees as those, which by virtue of their origin, size, uniqueness, and/or national or regional rarity are now or are likely to be of historical value. Trees determined to be historic are compiled on a master list, which is maintained by the Community Services Department and approved by resolution of the City Council. 14 A Protected Tree Report was prepared for the Project (refer to Appendix B) to assess what on- and off-site trees could be affected by the Project and to identify measues to protect trees that would not be removed as part of the Project. There are four trees that would be affected by the Project: two silk oak trees (Grevillea robusta) located on the eastern portion of the Project Site and two trees that are off-site but near the Project Site boundary, including an Aleppo pine tree (Pinus halepensis) located at the northcentral boundary of the Project Site and a large Moreton Bay Fig (Ficus macrophulla) (refer to Figure 14). Information regarding the condition of the trees is included on Table 9. The two silk oak trees would be removed as part of the Project through the City’s tree-removal permit process. The two off-site trees (i.e., the Moreton bay fig and the Aleppo pine tree) are proposed to be protected in place. 13 Page 5.4-23, in City of Orange General Plan Program EIR: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR- PDF. 14 Page 5.5-16, in City of Orange General Plan Program EIR: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR- PDF. Source: Shelter Architects, 2019.Figure 14Arborist Site Plan Page 51 Table 9 Tree Matrix Tree Tag Tree Species Condition DBH Height (feet) Canopy Width (feet) Suitability for Preservation Fencing Type Tree Fencing Dimensions Recommendation Notes 1 Moreton Bay Fig Ficus macrophylla Good 12.5’ 80 150x142 High Type I 15’ outside dripline of tree Protect - 2 Aleppo Pin Pinus halepensis Fair 21” 25 30x34 High Type I 10’ outside dripline of tree Protect Browning on needles 3 Silk Oak Tree Grevillea robusta Fair 45” 90 30x32 Low NA NA Remove - 4 Silk Oak Tree Grevillea robusta Fair 34” 90 34x32 Low NA NA Remove - Source: Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc., 2019. Page 52 The Moreton Bay Fig tree is designated as a historic tree in the City. The tree reportedly originated in Australia and was brought to America by the early settlers. Moreton Bay Fig trees are nearly extinct, and when they remain, it is very rare. The Native Daughters of the Goldenwest have dedicated a landmark plaque near the tree to honor Henri F. Gardner, a pioneer who planted the tree at its location on March 6, 1875. The land on which the church, the rectory and the school stand (i.e., the property located to the north of the Project Site) was originally owned by the Gardner Family. As indicated on Table 9, the tree is approximately 80 feet tall, with a canopy width of approximately 150 feet by 142 feet, and is in “good” condition. The Aleppo pine tree is approximately 25 feet tall, with a canopy width of approximately 30 feet by 34 feet, and is considered to be in “fair” condition, experiencing browning on needles. If care is not taken during the Project’s construction phase, the root system of these off-site trees could be damaged, potentially resulting in significant impacts to the trees. Lowering the grade around trees can have an immediate and long-term effect on trees. Typically, most tree roots are within the top 3 feet of soil, and most of the fine roots active in water and nutrient absorption are in the top 12 inches. Construction activities near trees may have long-term effects on the trees. Trees vary in their ability to adapt to altered growing conditions. Mature trees can have established stable biological systems in the pre-existing physical environment. Disruption of this environment by construction activities interrupts the tree’s physiological processes causing depletion of energy reserves and a decline in vigor, which may result in a tree’s death. Typically, this reaction develops between one to five years, but symptoms may not show for many years after injurious disruption. For the Moreton Bay Fig tree, it is estimated that approximately 15 percent of the root zone under the trees canopy would be affected by the Project’s construction-related ground-disturbing activities. To ensure that construction activities associated with the Project do not damage the two referenced off-site trees, implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-3 would be required. These measures include monitoring of the Project’s ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity of the off-site trees by a qualified arborist to ensure that the tree protection measures outlined in the mitigation measures are followed. The tree protection measures would provide for the physical protective barriers to control site disturbances and activies such as grading, demolition, building, hardscape and landscape construction, infrastrure and utility installation, maintenance, or other changes near the trees. In addition, the Project includes the installation of Biaxial Geogrid material within the proposed driveway area of the Project over the root system of the two off-site trees. This material is a stiff synthetic permeable material, consisteing of sets of tensile ribs pre-tensioned in tow directions to allow pinning down of surrounding soil, stone, and/or other material. The Biaxial Geogrid material will be placed over the roots to minimize the potential for root and soil compaction due to use of the driveway and to improve irrigation filtration for the trees. Through use of the Biaxial Geogrid material compliance with Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-3, Project impacts related to trees would be less than significant. Page 53 Significance Determination: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: BIO-2: The Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Arborist to oversee protection of the off-site trees during the applicable Project construction phases. BIO-3: The Project Applicant shall implement all of the tree protection measures and recommendations outlined in the Protected Tree Report. Design Guidelines—Site, Grading & Improvements 1. Project plans shall delineate a tree protection zone (TPZ) according to the dimensions shown on Table 1 of the Protected Tree Report. The TPZ shall be delineated as the boundary extending 15 feet outside of the dripline of the Moreton Bay Fig tree and the Aleppo pine tree as determined by the Project Arborist. 2. In the TPZ, all trenching, soil scraping, compaction, mass grading, finish-grading, over excavation, sub excavation, swales, bio swales, storm drains, equipment cleaning, stockpiling/dumping of materials, and equipment operation shall be avoided. Where an impact encroaches slightly within a setback, it can be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the Project Arborist to determine appropriate protection measures. 3. All existing unused lines, pipes, and vaults within the TPZ shall be abandoned and cut off at existing grade rather than being dug up and causing subsequent root damage. 4. The permanent and temporary drainage design, including downspouts, shall not require water being discharged within the TPZ. The drainage shall not require trenching for storm drains or swales within the TPZ. 5. Underground utilities and services shall be routed beyond the TPZ. 6. The future staging area and route(s) of access shall not be in TPZ. 7. Restrict spoils and runoff from traveling into root zones, the Project’s erosion control design shall establish silt fencing or straw wattles (or comparable material) along the TPZ fencing. Design Guidelines--Proposed Landscape Design 1. Irrigation shall not spray the trunk. 2. Irrigation, valves, and lighting features shall be placed so that no trenching occurs within the TPZ. Page 54 3. New property fencing and fence posts shall be placed at least 2 feet from the tree trunk. 4. Groundcover beneath the canopy shall comprise 5-inch layer of wood chips or other high- quality mulch. Keep mulch at least 6 inches from trunk. 5. Tilling, ripping, and compaction within the TPZ shall be avoided. 6. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopy shall be placed at existing grade. 7. Roots with diameters of 2 inches or greater shall not be damaged or cut without prior assessment of the Project Arborist. 8. All tools shall be sanitized in between root cuts for roots that 0.5 inches and larger. Materials commonly used to sterilize tools include bleach (10 percent solution) or Lysol. During Demolition and Construction 1. Tree trunks shall not be used as winch supports for moving or lifting heavy loads. 2. The removal of existing features within the TPZ shall be carefully performed to avoid excavating into root zones. 3. Roots with diameters of 2 inches or greater should not be damaged or cut without prior assessment of the Project Arborist. 4. All tools shall be sanitized in between root cuts. Materials commonly used to sterilize tools include bleach (10 percent solution) or Lysol. 5. Supplemental water shall be be provided as determined by the Project Arborist to help mitigate root loss/disturbance. 6. Spoils created during digging shall not be piled or spread on unpaved ground within the TPZ. 7. Digging holes for fence posts within the TPZ shall be manually performed. In the event a root of 2 inches or greater in diameter is encountered, the process should be shifted over by 12 inches and the process repeated. 8. Great care shall be taken by equipment operators to position their equipment to avoid the trunks of protected trees. The Project Arborist shall be consulted to provide a feasible solution if needed. Page 55 9. Dust accumulating on trunks and canopies during dry weather periods shall be periodically washed away every 3 to 4 months. Dust accumulating on trunks and canopies after grading shall also be washed at the completion of the grading. 10. The disposal of harmful products shall be prohibited beneath the canopies. Herbicide shall not be used within the TPZ on site or shall be labeled for safe use near trees. Grading Limitations within the Tree Protection Zone 1. Grade changes within the TPZ shall not permitted. Tilling, ripping, and compaction within the TPZ shall be avoided. 2. Grade changes outside the TPZ shall not significantly alter drainage. 3. Grade changes under specifically approved circumstances shall not allow more than 6 inches of fill soil or allow more than 4 inches of existing soil to be removed from natural grade, unless mitigated. 4. Grade fills over 6 inches or impervious overlay shall incorporate an approved permanent aeration system, permeable material, or other approved mitigation. 5. Grade cuts exceeding 4 inches shall incorporate retaining walls or an appropriate transition equivalent. (f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? There are no NCCP Habitat Reserve, Non-Reserve Open Space, or Special Linkage designations in or around the Project Site.15 The Project Site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized portion of the City. The Project Site is developed with a restaurant building, surface parking, and ornamental landscaping. Thus, the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None 15 Figure 5.4-2, NCCP Habitat Reserve Area, in City of Orange General Plan Program EIR: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR- PDF. Page 56 Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. All of the related projects are located on developed sites and within an urbanized area of the City. None of the sites of the cumulative projects contains protected biological resources. The degree to which any trees would be removed/replaced would be addressed by the City on a project-by-project basis. Therefore, no significant cumulative impacts related to biological resources would occur. Page 57 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in significance of a historical resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? R b. Cause a substantial adverse change in significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? R c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? R Impact Analysis (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in significance of a historical resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? The analysis in this section is based primarily on the following (refer to Appendix C): • Historic Resources Evaluation, 574 South Glassell Street, Architectural Resources Group, May 2019. Direct Impacts Regulatory Framework Generally, a lead agency must consider a property a historical resource under CEQA if it is eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). The California Register is modeled after the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). Furthermore, a property is presumed to be historically significant if it is listed in a local register of historical resources or has been identified as historically significant in a historic resources survey (provided certain criteria and requirements are satisfied) unless a preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the property is not historically or culturally significant. The National Register, California Register, and local designation programs are discussed below. National Register of Historic Places The National Register is “an authoritative guide to be used by federal, state, and local governments, private groups, and citizens to identify the nation’s cultural resources and to indicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment.” Page 58 Criteria To be eligible for listing in the National Register, a property must be at least 50 years of age (unless the property is of “exceptional importance”) and possess significance in American history and culture, architecture, or archaeology. A property of potential significance must meet one or more of the following four established criteria: A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. Yield, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. California Register of Historical Resources The California Register is an authoritative guide used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse impacts. The California Register consists of properties that are listed automatically as well as those that must be nominated through an application and public hearing process. The California Register automatically includes the following: • California properties listed in the National Register and those formally Determined Eligible for the National Register; • State Historical Landmarks from No. 0770 onward; and • Those California Points of Historical Interest that have been evaluated by the State Office of Historic Preservation (SOHP) and have been recommended to the State Historical Resources Commission for inclusion on the California Register. Criteria and Integrity For those properties not automatically listed, the criteria for eligibility of listing in the California Register are based upon National Register criteria, but are identified as 1-4 instead of A-D. To be eligible for listing in the California Register, a property generally must be at least 50 years of age and must possess significance at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following four criteria: Page 59 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; or 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; or 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important in the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Properties eligible for listing in the California Register may include buildings, sites, structures, objects, and historic districts. A property less than 50 years of age may be eligible if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance. While the enabling legislation for the California Register is less rigorous with regard to the issue of integrity, there is the expectation that properties reflect their appearance during their period of significance. The California Register may also include properties identified during historic resource surveys. However, the survey must meet all of the following criteria: 1. The survey has been or will be included in the State Historic Resources Inventory; 2. The survey and the survey documentation were prepared in accordance with office [SOHP] procedures and requirements; 3. The resource is evaluated and determined by the office [SOHP] to have a significance rating of Category 1 to 5 on a DPR Form 523; and 4. If the survey is five or more years old at the time of its nomination for inclusion in the California Register, the survey is updated to identify historical resources that have become eligible or ineligible due to changed circumstances or further documentation and those that have been demolished or altered in a manner that substantially diminishes the significance of the resource. Environmental Setting The Project Site is developed with a restaurant that was originally connected to a miniature golf course on the adjacent land to the south. The property is located on S. Glassell St., which leads directly south from the Plaza that was the geographic and commercial heart of the town of Orange (incorporated in 1888). The property consists of a restaurant building with a landscaped setback to the east (along S. Glassell St.) and an adjacent parking lot to the rear (west). A driveway along the north side provides access to the rear parking lot. The building is set at an angle to the street, with its south corner lying very close to the south property line. A large three-story apartment building lies to the south of the Project Site, on the former site of a miniature golf course with which the restaurant building was formerly associated. The property of Holy Family Cathedral and school lies north of the Project Site. Page 60 The restaurant was constructed in 1962 and was known as Kim’s Family Restaurant. The architect of the building was William E. Swank and Associates of Orange. The restaurant (and to a greater extent, the golf course) was originally Tiki themed, however, there was very little such material remaining on the façade. Character-defining features that associate the property with its 1962 origins include: A-frame roof/massing, siting of the building in an angular position relative to the street, lava rock and Palos Verdes stone planters and wall cladding, front trellis, and small areas of bamboo trim remaining on the rear doorways (which faced the golf course). Aside from the distinctive A- frame shape that the building retains, the building is compromised in its ability to convey its significance. The senior housing apartment building adjacent to the south, which replaced the golf course, received its entitlements in 1985, and the golf course was removed by 1986. Evaluation of Historical Significance The property was evaluated for its eligibility for local historical designation with reference to the City of Orange General Plan Section for Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation. The City does not have specific criteria for local designation, but employs the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources (the City has other mechanisms for the designation of historic districts and historic preservation zoning overlays that are not relevant to the possible significance of this property). The property is evaluated under each of the California Register criteria, which mirror those of the National Register, below. Criterion 1: Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. The property has the potential for association with the historical theme of family dining and recreation in post-war Orange County. This context has not been studied and documented to the point where there is enough information to evaluate a minor example such as this. To use the example of the Tiki theme, at least two examples have been listed in the National Register, but these were especially significant examples that had changed very little since their period of significance and serve as a testament to the role of Tiki in popular post-war culture. There is no apparent equivalent cultural value to this property. Further, because the golf course was, arguably, the greater and more unique draw for this property as a recreational venue, its loss significantly diminishes its ability to convey any significance under the theme of post-war family recreation. The golf course was also much larger than the restaurant and appears to have carried the Tiki or Polynesian theme throughout. Therefore, along with the loss of any Tiki or Polynesian features that may have identified the restaurant and tied it into the theme, most of the theme was eliminated with the loss of the golf course. Due to the property’s inability to convey its significance in contributing to broad patterns of local history, it is not eligible under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history. Page 61 No single historical person came to light with whom the property would be significantly associated. The property is not eligible under this criterion. Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values. The property’s architect, William E. Swank, is not established as a well-known practitioner of the period who could be considered a “master architect,” and the building does not “(possess) high artistic values.” The property may once have embodied the “distinctive characteristics of a type,” serving as an example of the architectural type of an A-frame. However, it does not exhibit the cultural associations that make A- frame restaurants of historical interest due to its lack of integrity: while it is difficult to pinpoint its alterations due to lack of available evidence of its historical appearance, the property has changed businesses many times, the original pole sign no longer exists, and the entrance area does not retain the materials and decoration that the original restaurant apparently possessed (according to what little evidence we have of its early years), even if it was only minimally Tiki in its styling. More importantly, the development of the property had two significant components that appear to have been conceived and constructed together in order to express a theme and function that both would convey: that of a Tiki or Polynesian recreational and dining environment. With the loss of the golf course, the ability of the property to convey its significance is substantially diminished. The setting of the building is no longer what it was – a restaurant set within a golf course – and the function of the building is different as well since it is a freestanding restaurant business and no longer a part of a recreational unit that would have conveyed considerably more aesthetic information about popular architecture in early 1960s Orange County. The property is not eligible under Criterion 3 due to the lack of significance in its architect or its artistic values. It is also not eligible because of its inability to convey its significance through its embodiment of the built history of a type, period, or region. Criterion 4: Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation. This criterion applies mainly to potential archaeological resources. This evaluation shows that the property was formerly a minimally Tiki-themed restaurant associated with a miniature golf course. While the context of such properties is an emerging area of historical interest in Orange County’s recent past, the Historical Resources Study found that this theme is not well documented and that the historic integrity of the property appears to be too low to contribute in a meaningful way to our understanding of the theme. Page 62 Historic Integrity Historic Integrity is defined as the ability of a property to convey its historic significance, expressed through surviving characteristics that it obtained during its period of significance. Broadly speaking, the early 1960s appearance of the building represents its period of significance. The following seven aspects of historic integrity – location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association – are defined by the National Park Service for use in the evaluation of properties for the National Register, and are also used as a guideline in many other designation programs. The historic integrity of 574 S. Glassell St. is analyzed below. Location: The property has not been moved and maintains integrity of location. Setting: The property’s setting has been compromised by the loss of the miniature golf course with which it was associated and its replacement with a large apartment building close to the south property line. It is clear from the 1963 aerial view on page 8 that the golf course and restaurant were sited so as to complement one another. The golf course functioned in part as the setting of the restaurant and gave it thematic and recreational meaning. Without this relationship, it is simply a restaurant, which does not reflect its historic use or setting. Design: The property may maintain integrity of design, but there is little in the public record to document its original appearance or any alterations. An A-frame typically takes advantage of the contrast between the solid roof and the non-load-bearing end walls; no such element of the design remains present. The overall shape of the exaggerated, A-frame roof is its most important feature and remains intact, but any information about the building from its historical period contained in the building’s decorative scheme appears to have been lost. The removal of the adjacent golf course also affected the integrity of design of the property as it was historically, since during that period the restaurant was a part of the larger miniature golf complex and related directly to the golf course. Materials: With so little documentation available, it is not known whether the building retains integrity of materials. However, this is unlikely to be an important factor in the property’s potential significance. Workmanship: As for materials, there is not enough information available to determine the building contained significant workmanship or whether it maintains integrity of workmanship; the workmanship also is unlikely to be an important factor in the property’s potential significance. Page 63 Feeling: The building does not possess historic feeling. There is very little in the way of exterior features to identify the building with its early period or character. While still used as a restaurant, the building has little to convey about the early 1960s when it was constructed. This is due to both the alterations to the building itself (the loss of any thematic decoration) and to the compromised setting, with the loss of the golf course that completed the complex historically and its replacement with a large apartment building directly next to the restaurant. Association: The building’s association with the historical theme of mid-century themed family dining and recreation is tenuous due to the lack of integrity noted for the aspects above. In addition to the golf course’s role as the physical setting of the restaurant, it also would have had more to communicate about the family recreation themes that the property once represented. The restaurant on its own, as noted above, does not carry the associations of the recreation complex of which it was historically a part. Conclusion The Historic Resources Report found that the property at 574 S. Glassell St. is not eligible for the California Register and thus, is not a historic resource for purposes of CEQA. The property was once a Tiki-style restaurant associated with a neighboring miniature golf course. If intact, such a property might represent an important theme in the post-World War II culture of Southern California, and Orange County in particular. However, the miniature golf course no longer exists, and the restaurant lacks the character-defining features that would associate it with emerging historical and architectural contexts of popular culture in 1960s Orange County. The property lacks significance due to an inability to express these themes and provide information about local history. Thus, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in significance of a historical resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5. Therefore, no direct impacts related to historic resources would occur as a result of the Project. Moreton Bay Fig Tree As discussed previously in response to Checklist Question 4(e) (Biological Resources – Tree Preservation), the Moreton Bay Fig tree that is located directly adjacent to the northeastern boundary of the Project Site is designated as a historic tree in the City. The tree reportedly originated in Australia and was brought to America by the early settlers. Moreton Bay Fig trees are nearly extinct, and when they remain, it is very rare. The Native Daughters of the Goldenwest have dedicated a landmark plaque near the tree to honor Henri F. Gardner, a pioneer who planted the tree at its location on March 6, 1875. The land on which the church, the rectory and the school stand (i.e., the property located to the north of the Project Site) was originally owned by the Gardner Family. As indicated on Table 9, the tree is approximately 80 feet tall, with a canopy width of approximately 150 feet by 142 feet, and is in “good” condition. As discussed in detail in response to Checklist Question 4(e) (Biological Resources – Tree Preservation), if care is not taken during the ground-disturbing activities as part of the Project’s construction phase, root Page 64 damage to the tree could occur and could detrimentally affect the health of the tree and the significance of the tree as a historic resources. However, Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-3 would ensure protection of the tree in place and would ensure that no significant impacts to the tree would occur. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-3, potential impacts of the Project on historic resources would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measures BIO-2 through BIO-3 under response to Checklist Question 4(b) (Biological Resources – Tree Preservation). Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant (b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? The Project Site is currently developed with a restaurant building and a surface parking lot. The Project Site is in an urbanized area of the City and is surrounded by a mix of residential, commercial/retail, education, and office uses. The Project Site has already been subject to construction and ground-disturbing activities similar to those which would occur under the Project. According to the cultural resources records search for the Project Site (refer to Appendix C), no archaeological sites have been recorded on or within a 0.5- mile radius of the Project Site. Five historical resources have been identified within a 0.5-mile radius. Additionally, the Figure 5.5-2 (Historial Archaeology Sensitivity) of the City’s General Plan EIR notes that a Chinese Boarding Area (1875-1921) has been identified in the area of the Project Site. Also, the Project Site is located just south of a sensitive area identified by the City as Early Town Development (1870s- 1880s). As such, it is possible that unknown archaeological resources could exist at the Project Site and could be encountered during ground-disturbing activities associated with Project construction. If proper care is not taken, significant impacts to unknown archaeological resources could occur. However, the Project Applicant would be required to implement Mitigation Measure CUL-1, which provides direction for the proper recordation of previously undiscovered archaeological resources, should such resources be found during Project construction activities. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would ensure that the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5. Therefore, with mitigation, Project impacts related to archaeological resources would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: CUL-1: In the event a potentially significant cultural resource is encountered during earthwork activities, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the find shall cease and workers shall avoid altering the materials until a qualified archaeologist who meets the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology has evaluated the situation. The Project Applicant shall include a standard inadvertent discovery clause Page 65 in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction activities shall be recorded on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria by a qualified archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, glass, ceramics, wood, or shell artifacts, or features including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. If the resource is determined to be significant under CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and implement a research design and archaeological data recovery plan that will capture those categories of data for which the site is significant in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The archaeologist shall also perform appropriate technical analyses, prepare a comprehensive report complete with methods, results, and recommendations, and provide for the permanent curation or repatriation of the recovered resources in cooperation with the designated most likely descendant as needed. The report shall be submitted to the City of Orange, the South Central Coastal Information Center, and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), if required. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant (c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City and is developed with a restaurant building and surface parking. Although the Project Site has been subject to grading and development in the past and no human remains are known to exist at the site, the Project would require grading and some trenching for installation of utilities, and it is possible that unknown human remains could be encountered at the site. In accordance with the State’s Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains at the Project Site, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Orange County Coroner has determined, in accordance with Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 27460) of Part 3 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the Government Code, that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code or any other related provisions of law concerning investigation of the circumstances, manner, and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative, in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Through compliance with the regulatory standards described above, potential Project impacts to human remains would be less than significant. Page 66 Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. There are no shared cultural resources among the cumulative projects and the Project. Thus, no significant cumulative impacts related to cultural resources would occur. Page 67 6. ENERGY. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Result in potential significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? R (b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project result in potential significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? (b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Checklist Questions 6(a) and 6(b) are addressed together, because the responses to both questions are closely related. In accordance with Appendix F of the CEQA Thresholds, the following are considered in determining the significance of the Project’s energy impacts: 1. The project’s energy requirements and its energy use efficiencies by amount and fuel type for each stage of the project including construction, operation, maintenance, and/or removal. If appropriate, the energy intensiveness of materials may be discussed; 2. The effects of the project on local and regional energy supplies and on requirements for additional capacity; 3. The effects of the project on peak and base period demands for electricity and other forms of energy; 4. The degree to which the project complies with existing energy standards; 5. The effects of the project on energy resources; 6. The project’s projected transportation energy use requirements and its overall use of efficient transportation alternatives; 7. The degree to which the project design and/or operations incorporate energy-conservation measures, particularly those that go beyond City requirements; and Page 68 8. Whether the Project conflicts with adopted energy conservation plans. Electricity is provided to the Project Site by Southern California Edison (SCE). Natural gas is provided to the Project Site by The Southern California Gas Company (The Gas Company). Both forms of energy are provided to the Project Site via existing infrastructure located adjacent to the site. The Project would be served by this infrastructure and would not require the need for new, expanded, or relocated energy infrastructure. For the reasons discussed below, Project impacts related to energy would be less than significant. Project Energy Requirements Construction During Project construction, energy would be consumed in the form of electricity associated with the conveyance of water used for dust control and, on a limited basis, powering lights, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power. As discussed below, construction activities, including the construction of the new building, typically do not involve the consumption of natural gas. Project construction would also consume energy in the form of petroleum-based fuels associated with the use of off-road construction vehicles and equipment on the Project Site, construction worker travel to and from the Project Site, and delivery and haul truck trips (e.g., hauling of demolition material to off-site reuse and disposal facilities). As shown on Table 10 and as discussed further below, Project construction would consume approximately a total of 846 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity, 7,028 gallons of gasoline, and 103,084 gallons of diesel. Project construction is expected to be completed by 2021. Electricity As shown on Table 10, a total of approximately 846 kWh of electricity is anticipated to be consumed during Project construction. The electricity demand at any given time would vary throughout the construction period based on the construction activities being performed, and would cease upon completion of construction. When not in use, electric equipment would be powered off so as to avoid unnecessary energy consumption. Natural Gas Construction activities, including the construction of the new building, typically do not involve the consumption of natural gas. Accordingly, natural gas would not be supplied to support Project construction activities. Thus, there would be no demand generated by construction. Transportation Energy The petroleum-based fuel use summary provided on Table 10 represents the amount of transportation energy that could potentially be consumed during Project construction based on a conservative set of assumptions outlined in Appendix D. As shown, on- and off-road vehicles would consume an estimated Page 69 7,028 gallons of gasoline and approximately 103,084 gallons of diesel fuel throughout the Project’s construction. Table 10 Summary of Energy Use During Project Construction Fuel Type Quantity Electricity Water Consumption 846 kWh Lighting, electronic equipment, and other construction activities necessitating electrical power N/A Total Electricity 846 kWh Gasoline On-Road Construction Equipment 7,028 gallons Off-Road Construction Equipment 0 gallons Total Gasoline 7,028 gallons Diesel On-Road Construction Equipment 79,287 gallons Off-Road Construction Equipment 23,797 gallons Total Diesel 103,084 gallons Total Petroleum-Based Fuel 110,112 gallons kWh = kilowatt-hours Note: Numbers have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Detailed calculations are included in Appendix D. Operation During operation of the Project, energy would be consumed for multiple purposes, including, but not limited to HVAC; refrigeration; lighting; and the use of electronics, equipment, and machinery. Energy would also be consumed during Project operations related to water usage, solid waste disposal, and vehicle trips. As shown on Table 11 the Project would result in a net decrease in electricity consumption of approximately 93,382 kWh when compared to the existing restaurant use. As shown on 12, the Project would result in a net decrease in natural gas consumption of approximately 1,179,611 1,000 British thermal units (kBTU) per year when compared to the existing restaurant use. As shown on Table 13, the Project would result in a net decrease in fuel of approximately 60,779 gallons per year when compared to the existing restaurant use. Page 70 Table 11 Estimated Project Electricity Demand Land Use Size Total (kw-h/yr) Existing Restaurant 5,959 sf 217,384 Surface Parking Lot 34,000 sf 11,900 Total Existing 229,284 Proposed Memory Care Facility 30,113 sf 127,210 Surface Parking Lot 15,000 sf 8,692 Project Total 135,902 Less Existing -229,284 Net Total -93,382 kw-h = kilowatt-hour yr = year sf =square feet 1 Calculated via CalEEMod. Refer to Appendix A. Table 12 Estimated Project Natural Gas Demand Land Use Size Total (kBTU/yr) Existing Restaurant 5,959 sf 1,545,290 Surface Parking Lot 34,000 sf 0 Total Existing 1,545,290 Proposed Memory Care Facility 30,113 sf 365,679 Surface Parking Lot 15,000 sf 0 Project Total 365,679 Less Existing -1,545,290 Net Total -1,179,611 kBTU = 1,000 British Thermal Units yr = year sf =square feet 1 Calculated via CalEEMod. Refer to Appendix A. Page 71 Table 13 Estimated Project Transportation Petroleum-Based Fuel Fuel Type Gallons Per Year Gasoline Project 66,9435 Less Existing -26,085 Net Total Gasoline -43,735 Diesel Project 9,041 Less Existing -26,085 Net Total Diesel -17,044 Total Fuel -60,779 Detailed calculations are included in Appendix D. Effects on Local and Regional Energy Supplies As shown on Tables 11 through 13, the Project would result in a net decrease in electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel consumption when compared to the existing restaurant use on the Project Site. As such, the Project would reduce the effect on local and regional energy supplies. Effects on Peak and Base Period Demands As shown on Tables 11 through 13, the Project would result in a net decrease in electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel consumption when compared to the existing restaurant use on the Project Site. As such, the Project would reduce the effect on peak and base period demands. Compliance with Existing Energy Standards The Project would be required by the City to comply with applicable Title 24 energy conservation standards Effects on Energy Resources As shown on Tables 11 through 13 the Project would result in a net decrease in electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel consumption when compared to the existing restaurant use on the Project Site. As such, the Project would reduce the effect on energy resources. Effects on Energy Resources As shown on Tables 11 through 13, the Project would result in a net decrease in electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel consumption when compared to the existing restaurant use on the Project Site. As such, the Project would reduce the effect on energy resources. Page 72 Transportation Fuel and Efficiency As shown on Table 13, the Project would result in a net decrease in transportation fuel consumption when compared to the existing restaurant use on the Project Site. As such, the Project would reduce the effect on energy resources. Compliance with Energy Conservation In 2017, the City adopted the 2016 California Building Standards Code, which includes the California Green Building Standards Code. The City would require the Project to comply with all applicable Green Building Standards, including those related to energy conservation. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. It is possible that the cumulative projects could result in an increase in the demand for energy sources. However, as discussed above, the Project would result in a net decrease in energy consumption when compared to the existing restaurant use. Thus, the Project would not have the potential to contribute to any cumulative energy impacts. Therefore, cumulative energy impacts would be less than significant. Page 73 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. R ii.) Strong seismic ground shaking? R iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? R iv.) Landslides? R (b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? R (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potential result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? R (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? R (e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? R (f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? R Impact Analysis The section is based in part on the following (refer to Appendix E): • Geotechnical Exploration Report, Leighton Consulting, Inc., January 29, 2019. • Paleontological Resources, Natural History Museum Los Angeles County, June 14, 2019. (a) i) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the Page 74 most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Based on the Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared for the Project, no active faults are mapped or are known to cross the Project Site, and the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Thus, the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (a) ii) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? The principal seismic hazard at the Project Site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake occurring along any of several major active and potentially active faults in southern California. Known regional active faults that could produce significant ground shaking at the site include the San Joaquin Hills Blind Thrust and Whittier faults located approximately 6.1 miles and 9.6 miles, respectively, from the site. The intensity of ground shaking at a given location depends primarily on the earthquake magnitude, the distance from the source, and the site response characteristics. Peak horizontal ground accelerations are generally used to evaluate the intensity of ground motion. Using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Seismic Design Maps), the peak ground acceleration for the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCEG) adjusted for the Site Class effects (PGAM) at the Project Site is 0.53g. Based on the USGS online unified hazard tool program, the modal seismic event is Moment Magnitude (MW) 6.9 at a distance of 6.5 miles. However, in accordance with Mitigation Measure GEO-1, the Project Applicant would be required by the City’s Building Division as part of the Project’s Plan Check process to comply with any recommendations made in a final Geotechnical Exploration Report that addresses the final design of the Project. In addition, the Project would be required to adhere to the latest adoption edition of the California Building Standards Code, which includes seismic design standards. Compliance with these requirements would ensure that the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: GEO-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit (whichever is issued first), the Project Applicant shall demonstrate to the City’s Community Development Department staff that Page 75 all applicable recommendations of the Project’s final Geotechnical Exploration Report have been incorporated into the Project design and grading plans. (a) iii) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Based on the Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared for the Project, the potential for liquefaction to occur at the Project Site is considered low. It has been estimated that the Project would experience earthquake-induced settlement of approximately less than 0.5 inches. However, in accordance with Mitigation Measure GEO-1, the Project Applicant would be required by the City’s Building Division as part of the Project’s Plan Check process to comply with any recommendations made in a final Geotechnical Exploration Report that addresses the final design of the Project. In addition, the Project would be required to adhere to the latest adoption edition of the California Building Standards Code, which includes seismic design standards. Compliance with these requirements would ensure that the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, impacts related to seismic-related ground failure would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: GEO-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit (whichever is issued first), the Project Applicant shall demonstrate to the City’s Community Development Department staff that all applicable recommendations of the Project’s final Geotechnical Exploration Report have been incorporated into the Project design and grading plans. (a) iv) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides? The Project Site topography and surrounding area are generally flat and not subject to landslides. Thus, the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The Project Site is completely developed with a restaurant building and surface parking and does not contain topsoil that is used for its nutrients. Page 76 Construction, grading, and excavation activities would expose areas of the Project Site to the erosional effects of wind or water for a protracted period of time. Development of the proposed project would include construction activities that would expose soils and could potentially result in substantial erosion. Excavation would be limited to that necessary for the installation of building foundations and utilities. All grading activities require adherence to the City’s grading ordinance, which include requirements and standards designed to limit potential impacts to acceptable levels. During construction, the Project would be required by to prevent the transport of sediments from the Project Site through stormwater runoff and winds through the use of appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs). Furthermore, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Distrubance Activities (Construction General Permit). To obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit, a Project Applicant must submit various documents, including a Notice of Intent and a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Activities subject to the Construction General Permit include clearing, grading, and distrubances to the ground, such as grubbing or excavation. The purpose of the SWPPP is to identify sources of sediment and other pollutants that could affect the quality of stormwater discharges and to describe and ensure the implementations of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce or eliminate sediment and other pollutants in stormwater as well as non-stormwater discharges resulting from construction activity. Potential BMPs for construction activities that could be used during the Project’s construction phase include but are not limited to silt fencing, fiber rolls, hydraulic mulch, velocity dissibation device, and construction waste management. With the implementation of the NPDES regulations, Project impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Mitigation Measure: None (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potential result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? The potential for liquefaction at the Project Site is considered low and the Project Site is not subject to landslides. Additionally, it has been estimated that the Project would experience earthquake-induced settlement of approximately less than 0.5 inches. However, in accordance with Mitigation Measure GEO- 1, the Project Applicant would be required by the City’s Building Division as part of the Project’s Plan Check process to comply with any recommendations made in a final Geotechnical Exploration Report that addresses the final design of the Project and with current California Building Code and City building. Compliance with these requirements would ensure that the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, impacts related to geologic or soil instability would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measure: Page 77 GEO-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit (whichever is issued first), the Project Applicant shall demonstrate to the City’s Community Development Department staff that all applicable recommendations of the Project’s final Geotechnical Exploration Report have been incorporated into the Project design and grading plans. (d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Based on the Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared for the Project, soils at the Project Site have a low potential for expansion. Thus, the Project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? The Project would not use a septic system for wastewater disposal. The Project would connect to the City’s existing sewer system for wastewater disposal. Thus, the Project would not require the installation of alternate wastewater disposal systems or septic tanks. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Paleontological resources include fossil remains, fossil localities, and formations that have produced fossil material in other nearby areas. Paleontological resources are limited, nonrenewable, sensitive scientific and educational resources, including fossils preserved either as impressions of soft (fleshy) or hard (skeletal) parts, mineralized remains of skeletons, tracks, or burrows; other trace fossils; coprolites (fossilized excrement); seeds or pollen; and other microfossils from terrestrial, aquatic, or aerial organisms. Page 78 The City’s General Plan has designated most of the planning area generally east of SR-55 as an area of paleontological resource sensitivity.16 The Project Site is currently developed with a restaurant building and surface parking. According to a records search conducted by the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History conducted in June 2019, there are no known paleontological resources present within the Project Site boundaries, although there are resources within the general Project Site area. Although the Project would require relatively shallow excavation work for the building foundation, it is possible that unknown paleontological resources could be encountered. Thus, the Project Applicant would be required to implement Mitigation Measure GEO-2, which would ensure that Project impacts related to paleontological resources would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measure: GEO-2: In the event a previously unrecorded paleontological deposit is encountered during construction; all activity shall cease in the vicinity of the find and redirected elsewhere, and the City shall be immediately informed of the discovery. A paleontologist shall be retained by the developer to: • Make recommendations on the treatment of the deposits. The recommendations shall be developed in accordance with applicable provisions of Public Resource Code Section 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15126.4. The City shall be consulted on the treatment of the deposits. The applicant shall follow all recommendations made by the paleontologist. The deposits shall not be disturbed or removed until the appropriate treatment has be recommended by the paleontologist and approved by the City. No construction activity in the vicinity of the find, the boundary of which shall be determined by the paleontologist, may resume until the recommendations for treatment of the deposits have been implemented. If applicable, the final report containing site forms, site significance, and mitigation measures shall be submitted to the Community Development Department when finalized. The final written report shall be submitted to the appropriate regional paleontological Information Center within three months after work has been completed. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant 16 Page 5.5-13 in City of Orange General Plan Program EIR: http://www.cityoforange.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=8417. Page 79 Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. Geology and soils impacts are site-specific. The City considers the geotechnical, geologic, and paleontological resources impacts on a project-by-project basis. As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts related to geotechnical/geologic issues, and with mitigation, Project impacts related to paleontological resources would be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to geology and soils would be less than significant. Page 80 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? R (b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? The analysis in this section is based primarily on the following (refer to Appendix A): • Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Modeling, NT Environmental Consulting, July 2019. Environmental Setting Climate Change Background Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions on Earth as a whole, including changes in temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Global warming, a related concept, is the observed increase in average temperature of Earth’s surface and atmosphere. One identified cause of global warming is an increase of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the atmosphere. GHG emissions are those compounds in Earth’s atmosphere that play a critical role in determining Earth’s surface temperature. Earth’s natural warming process is known as the “greenhouse effect.” It is called the greenhouse effect because Earth and the atmosphere surrounding it are similar to a greenhouse with glass panes in that the glass allows solar radiation (sunlight) into Earth’s atmosphere but prevents radiative heat from escaping, thus warming Earth’s atmosphere. Some levels of GHG emissions keep the average surface temperature of Earth close to a hospitable 60 degrees Fahrenheit. However, it is believed that excessive concentrations of anthoropogenic GHG emissions in the atmosphere can result in increased global mean temperatures, with associated adverse climatic and ecological consequences. Page 81 GHG Emissions Background GHG emissions include CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).17 Carbon dioxide is the most abundant GHG. Other GHG emissions are less abundant but have greater global warming potential than CO2. Thus, emissions of other GHG emissions are frequently expressed in their equivalent mass of CO2, denoted as CO2e. Forest fires, decomposition, industrial processes, landfills, and the consumption of fossil fuels for power generation, transportation, heating, and cooking are the primary sources of GHG emissions. Regulatory Framework There are any number of agreements, strategies, policies, regulations, and standards that relate to GHG emissions – from international climate accords to local climate action plans. The following plans, policies, and regulations are fundamental to the Project’s determination of significance with respect to its GHG emissions and consistency with these documents. State AB 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) and SB 32 In September 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, AB 32, into law. AB 32 committed the State to achieving the following: • By 2010, reduce statewide GHG emissions to 2000 levels.18 • By 2020, reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels. AB 32 further requires CARB to adopt rules and regulations that achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emissions reductions. Signed in September 2016 by Governor Jerry Brown, SB 32 updates AB 32 to include an emissions reductions goal for the year 2030. Specifically, SB 32 requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030. Climate Change Scoping Plan In 2008 CARB approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan (2008 Scoping Plan) detailing the approach that California would take to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, as required by AB 32. To achieve this, CARB determined that an approximate 28.5 percent reduction in GHG emissions would be 17 As defined by California Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and Senate Bill (SB) 104. 18 The 2010 target to reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels was not met. Page 82 necessary. That is, projected 2020 GHG emissions (i.e. emissions that would occur in 2020, absent any GHG-reducing laws and regulations) would have to be reduced by 28.5 percent. CARB prepared a revised and expanded document, the Supplemental Functional Equivalent Document to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (Supplemental FED), approved in August 2011. As part of the Supplemental FED, CARB updated the projected 2020 emissions inventory based on then-current economic forecasts (i.e. as influenced by the economic downturn) and GHG emissions reduction measures already in place.19 Ultimately, CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions levels by 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of 16 percent from BAU conditions, down from the previous 28.5 percent figure. CARB adopted the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework (First Update) in 2014. The First Update found that California is on track to meet AB 32’s 2020 emissions reduction mandate and determined that, by 2030, the State could reduce its GHG emissions to levels on course with those needed to achieve the 2050 target20 if it realizes the expected benefits of its existing policy goals. CARB further identified and developed recommended actions for six focus areas key to achieving the 2050 target: (1) energy; (2) transportation (vehicles/equipment, sustainable communities, housing, fuels, and infrastructure); (3) agriculture; (4) water; (5) waste management; and (6) natural and working lands. In December 2017, CARB adopted the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update: The Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target (2017 Update). The 2017 Update builds upon the successful framework established by the 2008 Scoping Plan and the First Update and identifies new, technologically feasible, and cost-effective strategies to ensure that the state meets its GHG reduction targets in a way that promotes and rewards innovation, continues to foster economic growth, and delivers improvements to the environment and public health. It includes policies to require direct GHG reductions at some of the state’s largest stationary sources and mobile sources, such as use of lower GHG fuels, efficiency regulations, and the Cap-and-Trade program, which constraints and reduces emissions at covered sources. 19 E.g. the million-solar-roofs program, AB 1493 (Pavley I) motor vehicle GHG emissions standards, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). Pavley I, the first GHG standard in the nation for passenger vehicles, took effect for model years starting in 2009 to 2016. Pavley I could potentially result in a 27.7 million metric tons CO2e reduction of GHG emissions by 2020. Pavley II covers models years 2017 to 2025 and could result in additional reductions of 4.1 million metric tons CO2e. 20 The 2050 goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels was originally established by Executive Order S-3-05, issued by Governor Schwarzenegger in June 2005. However, the 2050 goal was not codified by either AB 32 or SB 32. Page 83 SB 97 Passed in August 2007, SB 97 required the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to prepare and develop CEQA guidelines for the effects and/or mitigation of GHG emissions, including effects associated with transportation and energy consumption. Subsequently, the Draft Guidelines Amendments for Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Guidelines Amendments) were adopted in December 2009 to address the specific obligations of public agencies when analyzing GHG emissions to determine a project’s effect on the environment, as pursuant to CEQA. However, the Guidelines Amendments provide no thresholds of significance or any specific mitigation measures; rather, they require a lead agency to make a good-faith effort to describe, calculate, or estimate the amount of GHG emissions that would result from a Project, to the extent possible based on scientific and factual data. The Guidelines Amendments give discretion to the lead agency whether to (1) use a model or methodology to quantify GHG emissions resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use; or (2) rely on a qualitative analysis or performance-based standards. Additionally, three factors that should be considered in the evaluation of the significance of GHG emissions are identified: (1) The extent to which a project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting; (2) Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project; and (3) The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. The administrative record for the Guidelines Amendments also clarifies “that the effects of greenhouse gas emissions are cumulative and should be analyzed in the context of CEQA’s requirements for the cumulative impact analysis.”21 The California Natural Resources Agency is required to periodically update the Guidelines Amendments to incorporate new information or criteria established by CARB pursuant to AB 32. SB 97 applies to any environmental impact report (EIR), negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or other document requirement by CEQA. 21 Letter from Cynthia Bryant, Director of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, to Mike Chrisman, California Secretary for Natural Resources, dated 13 April 2009. Page 84 Regional 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy SB 375 requires each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to adopt a Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) encouraging compact development that reduces passenger Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and trips, all for the purpose of meeting CARB-determined regional GHG emissions reduction targets. To implement SB 375 and reduce GHG emissions via strategic land use and transportation planning, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016-2040 RPT/SCS) in April 2016. In short, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS offers a blueprint for how Southern California can grow more sustainably, in particular by recognizing the relationship between transportation investments and land use patterns and how this relationship can sustain existing resources while expanding efficiency, mobility, and accessibility for people across the region. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS also includes strategies focused on compact infill development and supporting infrastructure that promotes the easier public access to jobs, services, educational facilities, healthcare, and more. To this end, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS reinforces the trend of focusing new housing and employment in the region’s High Quality Transit Area (HQTAs).22 Though these areas currently account for just 3 percent of total land in the SCAG region, they are projected to accommodate 46 percent of the region’s future household growth and 55 percent of the region’s future employment growth by 2040. HQTAs are a cornerstone of land use planning best practices in the SCAG region because they concentrate roadway repair investments, leverage transit and active transportation investments, reduce regional life cycle infrastructure costs, improve accessibility, create local jobs, and have the potential to improve public health and housing affordability. As a result, HQTAs are vital to the attainment of regional GHG emissions reduction targets: successful implementation of the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS would result in more complete communities with a variety of transportation and housing choices, reducing automobile use and, crucially, associated GHG emissions. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS is estimated to reduce per capita passenger vehicle GHG emissions by 8 percent by 2020 and 18 percent by 2035 – compared with 2005 levels. This would meet the region’s 2020 GHG reduction target of 8 percent per capita, and it exceeds the previous 13 percent target for 2035, which applied through September 30, 2018. However, in March 2018, CARB adopted updated targets requiring a 19 percent decrease in per capita passenger vehicle GHG emissions for the SCAG regional by 2035, effective as of October 1, 2018. The region’s 2020 target was unchanged. As the updated CARB targets were adopted after the promulgation of the 2016-2040 RPT/SCS, it is expected that the updated 2035 target will be incorporated into the next RTP/SCS. Overall, the 2016-2040 RPT/SCS and/or the next RPT/SCS are 22 The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS defines HQTAs as areas within one-half mile of a fixed guideway transit stop or a bus transit corridor where buses pick up passengers at a frequency of every 15 minutes or less during peak commuting hours. Page 85 expected to fulfill and exceed the region’s portion of SB 375 compliance with respect to meeting the state’s GHG emissions reduction goals. Local City of Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element Released in 2010 and last revised in December 2015, the City’s General Plan Natural Resources Element outlines the City’s climate change-related goals and policies and identifies additional climate change- related policies from other portions of the General Plan. Though Policy 3.2 calls on the City to “develop and adopt a comprehensive strategy to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) within Orange by at least 15 percent from currently levels by 2020,” it is unclear whether the City has adopted such a strategy or climate action plan. Existing Conditions Existing Statewide GHG Emissions As reported by the California Energy Commission (CEC), California contributes approximately one percent of global and 8.2 percent of national GHG emissions.23 California contains approximately 12 percent of the national population. Approximately 80 percent of GHGs in California are CO2 emitted from fossil fuel combustion. The current California GHG inventory compiles statewide anthropogenic GHG emissions and carbon sinks/storage from years 2000 through 2016.24 It includes estimates for CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. The 2010-2016 GHG inventory for California is presented on Table 14. As show, the GHG inventory for California in 2016 was 429.4 million MTCO2e. 23 California Energy Commission. Tracking Project, Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions. www.energy.ca.gov/renewables/tracking_progress/documents/Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reductions.pdf. December 2017. 24 A carbon inventory identifies and quantifies sources and sinks of greenhouse gases. Sinks are defined as a natural or artificial reservoir that accumulates and stores some carbon-containing chemical compound for an indefinite period. Page 86 Table 14 California GHG Inventory (million metric tons CO2e) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Transportation 165.07 161.51 161.22 160.90 162.28 166.14 169.38 On Road 151.20 148.03 147.71 147.07 148.04 151.52 154.64 Passenger Vehicles 114.13 111.37 111.77 111.52 112.20 116.33 119.03 Heavy Duty Vehicles 37.07 36.65 35.93 35.55 35.83 35.19 35.62 Ships & Commercial Boats 3.66 3.52 3.43 3.42 3.49 3.42 3.24 Aviation (Intrastate) 3.84 3.73 3.75 3.93 3.90 4.22 4.44 Rail 2.24 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.37 Off Road [1] 2.03 2.13 2.23 2.33 2.43 2.53 2.63 Unspecified 2.09 1.72 1.71 1.77 2.04 2.07 2.07 Industrial 91.50 90.94 91.07 93.73 93.96 91.58 89.61 Refineries and Hydrogen Production 30.46 30.12 29.88 29.22 29.40 28.21 29.61 General Fuel Use 17.93 18.78 18.91 19.31 19.87 19.23 18.53 Natural Gas 13.46 14.50 14.48 14.36 15.56 14.79 14.99 Other Fuels 4.47 4.28 4.43 4.94 4.31 4.45 3.53 Oil & Gas: Production & Processing [2] 16.80 16.73 16.73 19.11 19.47 19.58 17.93 Fuel Use 15.01 14.91 14.87 16.99 17.18 17.22 15.66 Fugitive Emissions 1.80 1.82 1.86 2.12 2.29 2.36 2.27 Cement Plants 5.57 6.14 6.92 7.20 7.61 7.56 7.60 Clinker Production 3.46 4.08 4.65 4.93 5.27 5.17 5.15 Fuel Use 2.11 2.07 2.26 2.28 2.34 2.39 2.45 Cogeneration Heat Output 12.61 11.15 10.81 10.99 9.64 8.98 8.00 Other Fugitive and Process Emissions 8.13 8.02 7.81 7.90 7.98 8.01 7.95 Natural Gas Transmission & Distribution [5] 3.94 3.92 3.88 3.82 3.87 3.94 3.99 Manufacturing 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.20 0.17 0.18 0.10 Wastewater Treatment 1.87 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.86 1.85 1.85 Other 2.08 2.02 1.90 2.03 2.08 2.04 2.01 Electric Power 90.34 88.06 95.09 89.65 88.24 83.67 68.58 In-State Generation 46.75 41.20 51.03 49.47 51.72 49.93 42.30 Natural Gas 40.59 35.92 45.77 45.66 46.43 45.16 38.28 Other Fuels 5.05 4.03 4.44 2.91 4.40 3.65 2.55 Fugitive and Process Emissions 1.10 1.25 0.82 0.90 0.90 1.13 1.48 Imported Electricity 43.59 46.86 44.07 40.17 36.51 33.74 26.28 Unspecified Imports 13.45 15.52 17.48 11.82 13.44 11.21 9.68 Specified Imports 30.14 31.34 26.59 28.35 23.07 22.52 16.60 Commercial and Residential 45.05 45.50 42.89 43.54 37.37 37.94 39.36 Residential Fuel Use 29.19 29.64 27.34 28.14 22.87 23.29 24.20 Natural Gas 26.99 27.51 25.76 26.52 21.58 21.90 22.80 Other Fuels 2.21 2.13 1.58 1.62 1.28 1.39 1.40 Commercial Fuel Use 13.58 13.71 13.41 13.30 12.51 12.67 12.92 Natural Gas 11.17 11.33 11.25 11.28 10.39 10.50 10.89 Other Fuels 2.41 2.38 2.16 2.02 2.12 2.16 2.03 Page 87 Table 14 California GHG Inventory (million metric tons CO2e) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Commercial Cogeneration Heat Output 0.92 0.78 0.76 0.71 0.58 0.56 0.81 Other Commercial and Residential 1.36 1.37 1.38 1.40 1.41 1.42 1.43 Agriculture 34.27 34.89 36.08 34.61 35.95 34.41 33.84 Livestock 24.00 23.84 24.47 23.49 23.81 23.10 22.99 Enteric Fermentation (Digestive Process) 12.13 11.98 12.10 11.78 11.85 11.40 11.35 Manure Management 11.86 11.86 12.38 11.71 11.96 11.70 11.64 Crop Growing & Harvesting 7.50 7.40 7.73 7.42 7.48 6.91 6.89 Fertilizers 5.78 5.67 5.93 5.65 5.72 5.28 5.25 Soil Preparation and Disturbances 1.64 1.65 1.73 1.69 1.68 1.56 1.56 Crop Residue Burning 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 General Fuel Use 2.77 3.65 3.88 3.71 4.66 4.39 3.95 Diesel 1.96 2.52 2.47 2.53 3.54 3.66 3.19 Natural Gas 0.65 0.66 0.70 0.69 0.63 0.64 0.72 Gasoline 0.16 0.48 0.71 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.04 Other Fuels 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 High GWP 13.52 14.54 15.54 16.65 17.70 18.93 19.78 Ozone Depleting Substance (ODS) Substitutes 13.20 14.21 15.25 16.38 17.42 18.37 19.24 Electricity Grid SF6 Losses [4] 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.18 0.14 0.42 0.37 Semiconductor Manufacturing [3] 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.16 Recycling and Waste 8.37 8.47 8.49 8.52 8.59 8.73 8.81 Landfills [3] 8.11 8.19 8.20 8.22 8.28 8.40 8.47 Composting 0.26 0.27 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.34 Included Inventory Emissions 448.11 443.91 450.38 447.59 444.10 441.40 429.35 a Reflects emissions from combustion of fuels plus fugitive emissions. b These categories are listed in the Industrial sector of CARB’s GHG Emission Inventory sectors. c This category is listed in the Electric Power sector of CARB’s GHG Emission Inventory sectors. d Reflects use of updated USEPA models for determining emissions from livestock and fertilizers. Source: CARB, 2018 of the GHG Emission Inventory, July 2018. Existing Project Site Emissions The Project Site currently contains a 5,959 square-foot former restaurant building and its related surface parking. As the restaurant is no longer operational (as of December 31, 2018), the site contains no active uses and likely generates nominal, if any, anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nevertheless, emissions associated with the former use were estimated for comparison purposes, and it was determined that the restaurant would have generated about 866 MT of CO2e annually. The Project would remove this former restaurant building and all other site improvements. Page 88 Project Impacts Methodology Because there is no “bright line” threshold of significance for GHG emissions, the methodology for evaluating a project’s impacts related to GHG emissions focuses on its consistency with statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions. This evaluation is the sole basis for determining the significance of a project’s GHG-related impacts on the environment. For this Project, as a land use development project, the most directly applicable adopted regulatory plan to reduce GHG emissions is the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, which is designed to achieve regional GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors as required by SB 375 and the State’s long-term climate goals. This analysis also evaluates the Project’s consistency with regulations or requirements set forth by the 2008 Scoping Plan and subsequent updates, as well as climate change-related goals and policies set forth by the City of Orange General Plan. For informational purposes, the consistency analysis also discloses the amount of GHG emissions emitted through the use of recommended air quality models. This disclosure ensures that the estimate of the Project’s GHG emissions satisfies State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a), which calls for a good-faith effort to describe and calculate emissions. However, the significance of a project’s GHG emissions impacts is not based on the amount of GHG emissions resulting from the project. Construction The Project’s construction emissions were calculated using CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Details of the modeling assumptions and emissions factors are provided in Appendix A. GHG emissions from construction activities were modeled using a reasonable estimate of the Project’s construction schedule and phasing. CalEEMod calculates emissions from off-road equipment usage and on-road vehicle travel associated with haul, delivery, and construction worker trips. In accordance with SCAQMD guidance, GHG emissions from construction were amortized over the lifetime of the Project. Because emissions from construction activities occur over a relatively short-term period of time, they contribute a relatively small portion of the overall lifetime GHG emissions for a project. Additionally, GHG emissions reduction measures for construction equipment are relatively limited. Thus, SCAQMD recommends that construction emissions be amortized over a 30-year project lifetime, so that GHG emissions reduction measures will address construction GHG emissions as part of the operational GHG reduction strategies.25 As a result, the Project’s total construction GHG emissions were divided by 30 to determine an approximate annual construction emissions estimate comparable to operational emissions. 25 SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda Item 31. December 5, 2008. Page 89 Operations Similar to construction, the SCAQMD-recommended CalEEMod is used to calculate potential GHG emissions generated by new land uses on the Project Site. The Project would result in direct and indirect GHG emissions generated by related vehicle trips and operations associated with the proposed building, including: (1) building operations: emissions associated with space heating and cooling, water heating, and lighting; (2) water: emissions associated with energy used to pump, convey, treat, delivery, and re-treat water; and (3) solid water: emissions associated with waste streams (embodied energy of materials). Climate Change Scoping Plan Tables 15 provides an evaluation of the Project’s consistency with applicable reduction actions/strategies outlined in the 2008 Scoping Plan and the First Update to that plan. The 2017 Scoping Plan Update identifies additional GHG reduction measures necessary to achieve the 2030 GHG emissions reductions target. Table 16 provides an evaluation of the Project’s consistency with this update. Based on the analysis on these tables, the Project would be consistent with the State’s Climate Change Scoping Plan. 2016-2040 RTP/SCS The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS is expected to help the SCAG region, and in turn California, reach its GHG reduction goals. Implementation of the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS is projected to reduce per capita transportation emissions by 9 percent by 2020 and by 16 percent by 2035.26 Though CARB has not set per capita GHG emissions reduction targets for passenger vehicles for 2040, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS GHG emissions reduction trajectory shows that more aggressive GHG emissions reductions are projected for 2040. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS would result in an estimated 8 percent decrease in per capita passenger vehicles GHG emissions by 2020, an 18 percent decrease by 2035, and a 21 percent decrease by 2040. By meeting and exceeding the SB 375 targets for 2020 and 2035, as well as achieving an approximately 21 percent decrease in per capita vehicle GHG emissions by 2040, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS is expected to fulfill and exceed its portion of SB 375 compliance. At the Project’s regional level, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS is an applicable plan adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. In order to assess the Project’s potential to conflict with or otherwise obstruct the goals of the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, this section analyzes the Project’s land use assumptions for those utilized by SCAG in the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. Generally, projects are considered consistent with the provisions and general policies of applicable City and regional land use plans and regulations if they are compatible with the general intent of the plans and would not preclude the attainment of their primary goals. Table 17 includes a discussion of the Project’s consistency with the Actions and Strategies set forth by the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. Based on the analysis on Table 17 the Project would be consistent with the 2016- 2040 RTP/SCS. 26 CARB, Regional Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets Pursuant to SB 375, Resolution 10-31. Page 90 Table 15 Consistency Analysis – Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis Area Sources SCAQMD Rule 445 (Wood Burning Devices): Requires use of natural gas to power all cooking stoves and fireplaces. SCAQMD Consistent. Any cooking stoves would either be electric or natural gas, not wood-burning. Energy California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program: SB 2X modified California’s RPS program to require that both public and investor-owned utilities in California receive at least 33 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by the year 2020. California SB 2X also requires regulated sellers of electricity to meet an interim milestone of procuring 25 percent of their energy supply from certified renewable resources by 2016. Southern California Edison Consistent. The Project would use electricity provided by Southern California Edison (SCE), which is required to meet SB 350 and subsequent SB 100 performance standards that exceed the RPS program standard. SB 100 revises the State’s renewable resources targets to 44 percent by 2024, 52 percent by 2027, 60 percent by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. According to SCE’s 2018 Draft Renewable Portfolio Standard Procurement Plan, the company received 31.6 percent of its electricity from RPS-eligible resources in 2017 and is positioned to achieve the 2020 target of 33 percent.A Senate Bill 350 (SB 350): The Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 increases the standards of the California RPS program by requiring that the amount of electricity generated and sold to retail customers per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to 50 percent by 2030 and also requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses of retail customers through energy efficiency and conservation.b State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, and SCE Consistent. SCE would be required to generate electricity that would increase renewable energy resources to 50 percent by 2030. As SCE would provide electricity service to the Project Site, by 2030, the Project would use electricity consistent with the requirements of SB 350. Senate Bill 1368 (SB 1368): The GHG Emissions Standard for Baseload Generation prohibits any retail seller of electricity in California from entering into a long-term financial commitment for baseload generation if the GHG emissions are higher than those from a combined-cycle natural gas power plant. State, CEC, and SCE Consistent. SCE is obligated to meet the requirements of SB 1368. As SCE provides electricity service to the Project Site, the Project would use electricity that meets the requirements under SB 1368. California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 20: The 2012 Appliance Efficiency Regulations, adopted by the State and CEC. Consistent. The Appliance Efficiency Regulations apply to new appliances and lighting that are sold or offered for sale Page 91 Table 15 Consistency Analysis – Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis CEC, include standards for new appliances (e.g. refrigerators) and lighting if they are sold or offered for sale in California. in California. The Project would include new appliances and lighting that comply with this energy efficiency standard. CCR, Title 24, Building Standards Code: The 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards contained in Title 24, Part 6 (also known as the California Energy Code), requires the design of building shells and building components to conserve energy. The standards are updated periodically to allow for consideration and possible incorporation of new energy-efficient technologies and methods. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11, Title 24) established mandatory and voluntary standards on planning and design for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (extensive update of the California Energy Code), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. State and CEC Consistent. Consistent with regulatory requirements, the Project must comply with applicable provisions of the OMC that in turn require compliance with Title 24 and the California Green Building Standards. The current 2016 Title 24 standards are 28 percent more efficient (for electricity) than residential construction built to the 2013 Title 24 standards and 5 percent more efficient for non-residential construction built to the 2013 Title 24 standards.C However on July 1, 2019, the 2019 California Building Standards Code was published, with an effective date of January 1, 2020. Though these updated standards have yet to go into effect and have not yet been adopted by the OMC, they would apply to the Project’s construction, which would comment subsequent to the effective date. Residences built to the new 2019 standards will be approximately 7 percent more efficient than those built to the 2016 standards. Nonresidential buildings will be approximately 30 percent more energy efficient.D Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA): EISA requires manufacturing for sale within the United States to phase out incandescent light bulbs between 2012 and 2014, resulting in approximately 25 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs. It would result in approximately 200 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs, or similar energy savings, by 2020. Federal/ Manufacturers Consistent. EISA would serve to reduce and/or eliminate the use of incandescent light bulbs for the Project and, thus, reduce energy usage associated with lighting. AB 1109: The Lighting Efficiency and Toxic Reduction Act prohibits a person from manufacturing for sale in the state specified general purpose lights that contain levels of hazardous substances and requires the establishment of State/Manufacturers Consistent. As with EISA, discussed above, the Project would meet the requirements under AB 1109 because it incorporates energy efficient lighting and electricity Page 92 Table 15 Consistency Analysis – Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis minimum energy efficiency standards for all general purpose lights. The standards are structured to reduce average statewide electrical energy consumption by not less than 50 percent from the 2007 levels for indoor residential lighting and not less than 25 percent from the 2007 levels for indoor commercial and outdoor lighting by 2018.E consumption that complies with local and state green building programs. Cap-and-Trade Program: This program establishes an overall limit on GHG emissions from capped sectors (e.g. electricity generation, petroleum refining, and cement production). Facilities subject to the cap are able to trade permits to emit GHG emissions within the overall limit. State/Manufacturers Consistent. As required by AB 32 and the Climate Change Scoping Plan, the Cap-and-Trade Program covers the GHG emissions associated with electricity consumed in California, whether generated in-state or imported. Accordingly, GHG emissions associated with CEQA projects’ electricity usage are covered by the Cap-and-Trade Program. Therefore, GHG emissions associated with the Project’s electricity usage per year would be covered by the Cap-and-Trade Program (as SCE would be a covered entity) and would be consistent with AB 32 and the Climate Change Scoping Plan. Mobile AB 1493 “Pavley Standards”: AB 1493 requires the development and adoption of regulations to achieve “the maximum feasible reduction of greenhouse gases” emitted by non-commercial passenger vehicles, light-duty trucks, and other vehicles used primarily for personal transportation in the State. In compliance with AB 1493, CARB adopted regulations to reduce GHG emissions from non-commercial passenger vehicles and light duty trucks of model year 2009 through 2016. Model years 2017 through 2025 are addressed by California’s Advanced Clean Cars program (discussed below). State, CARB Consistent. The Pavley regulations reduced GHG emissions from California passenger vehicles by about 22 percent in 2012 and reduced GHG emissions by about 30 percent in 2016, all while improving fuel efficiency. However, this regulatory program applies to vehicle manufacturers and not directly to land use development. Nonetheless, vehicular travel associated with the Project would benefit from the regulation in the form of reduced GHG emissions due to the increasing penetration of new vehicles in the state-wide fleet that are affected by AB 1493. Mobile source emissions generated by Project users would be reduced with the implementation of AB 1493, consistent with the reduction of GHG emissions under AB 32. The Project’s mobile source GHG emissions were calculated using CalEEMod, Page 93 Table 15 Consistency Analysis – Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis which incorporates the implementation of AB 1493 into mobile source emissions factors. Executive Order S-01-07: The Low Carbon Fuel Standard requires a 10-percent or greater reduction by 2020 in the average fuel carbon intensity for transportation fuels in California regulated by CARB. CARB identified the LCFS as a Discrete Early Action item under AB 32, and the final resolution (09-31) was issued on April 23, 2009.F,G State, CARB Consistent. This regulatory program applies to fuel suppliers and not directly to land use development. Nonetheless, GHG emissions related to the Project’s associated vehicles travel would benefit from this regulation because fuel consumed by Project-related vehicles would be required to comply with the LCFS. Advanced Clean Cars Program: In 2012 CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars Program, a new emissions-control program for model year 2017 through 2025. The program combines the control of smog, soot, and GHG emissions with requirements for greater numbers of zero-emissions vehicles. By 2025, when the rules will be fully implemented, new automobiles will emit 34 percent fewer GHGs and 75 percent fewer smog-forming emissions. State, CARB Consistent. Similar to AV 1493, this regulatory program applies to manufactures and not directly to land use development. Nonetheless, GHG emissions generated by Project-related vehicle travel would benefit from this regulation as new vehicles increasingly penetrate the state- wide fleet, and mobile source GHG emissions generated by the Project would subsequently be reduced, consistent with AB 32 requirements. However, as CalEEMod does not yet account for this regulation, estimates of the Project’s mobile source GHG emissions do not reflect the implementation of this regulatory program. SB 375: SB 375 requires the integration of planning processes for transportation, land-use, and housing. Under SB 375, each MPO would be required to adopt a Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) to encourage compact development that reduces passenger vehicle miles traveled and trips so that the regional will meet a target, established by CARB, for reducing GHG emissions. State, CARB, Regional, SCAG Consistent. SB 375 requires SCAG to direct the development of the SCS for the regional, which is discussed further below. The Project consists of an infill development that would be located near an emerging HQTA. As the Project would be consistent with SCAG’s 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, it would not conflict with the region’s obligations under SB 375 to meet the State’s GHG emissions reduction goals. Solid Waste California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 and AB 341: The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 requires each jurisdiction’s source reduction and recycling element to include an implementation State Consistent. GHG emissions related to solid waste generation from the Project would benefit from this regulation as it would decrease the overall amount of solid waste disposed of at landfills. The decrease in solid waste Page 94 Table 15 Consistency Analysis – Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis schedule that shows: (1) diversion of 25 percent of all solid waste by January 1, 1995, through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities; and (2) diversion of 50 percent of all solid waste on and after January 1, 2000, through source reduction, recycling, and composting facilities.H AB 341 amended the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to include a provision declaring that it is the policy goal of the state that not less than 75 percent of solid waste generated by source reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020, and annually thereafter.I would then in return decrease the amount of methane released from the decomposing solid waste. Project-related GHG emissions from solid waste generation include a 50- percent reduction in solid waste generation source emissions. The Project Applicant would only contract for waste disposal services with a company that recycles solid waste in compliance with AB 341. Additionally, the Project Applicant would be required to comply with AB 1826 (Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling) to recycle landscape cuttings and food waste. Further, the Project would provide recycling bins at appropriate locations to promote the recycling of paper, metal, glass, and other recyclables. Water CCR, Title 24, Building Standards Code: The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11, Title 24) includes water efficiency requirements for new residential and non- residential uses, in which buildings shall demonstrate a 20- percent overall water use reduction. State Consistent. As discussed earlier, consistent with regulatory requirements, the Project must comply with applicable provisions of the OMC that in turn require compliance with Title 24 and the California Green Building Standards. SB X7-7: The Water Conservation Act of 2009 sets an overall goal of reducing per-capita urban water use by 20 percent by December 31, 2020. The state is required to make incremental progress towards this goal by reducing per- capita water use by at least 10 percent by December 31, 2015. This is an implementing measure of the Water Sector of the AB 32 Scoping Plan. Reduction in water consumption directly reduces the energy necessary and the associated emissions to convene, treat, and distribute water; it also reduces emissions from wastewater treatment. State Consistent. The Project’s mandatory consistency with the regulatory provisions of Title 24 would meet this performance-based standard. Construction CARB In-Use Off-Road Regulation: CARB’s in-use off- road diesel vehicle regulation (“Off-Road Diesel Fleet CARB Consistent. The Project would use construction contractors that would comply with this regulation. Page 95 Table 15 Consistency Analysis – Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis Regulation”) requires the owners of off-road diesel equipment fleets to meet fleet average emissions standards pursuant to an established compliance schedule. CARB In-Use On-Road Regulation: CARB’s in-use on- road heavy-duty vehicle regulation (“Truck and Bus Regulation”) applies to nearly all privately and federally owned diesel fueled trucks and buses, as well as privately and publicly owned school buses with a gross vehicles weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds. CARB Consistent. The Project would use construction contractors that would comply with this regulation. A Southern California Edison Company’s (U 338-E) 2018 Draft Review Renewables Portfolio Standard Procurement Plan, August 2018. B SB 340 (2015-2016 Regular Session) Stats 2015, Ch. 547. C CEC, Adoption Hearing, 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. D CEC 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Overview, March 2018. E AB 1107 (2007-2008 Regular Session) Stats. 2007, Ch. 534. F CARB, Initial Statement of Reason for Proposed Regulation for the Management of High Global Warming Potential Refrigerant for Stationary Sources, October 2009. G Carbon intensity is a measure of the GHG emissions associated with the various production, distribution, and use steps in the “lifecycle” of a transportation fuel. H California Public Resources Code Section 41780(a). I California Public Resources Code Section 41780.01(a). Page 96 Table 16 Consistency Analysis – 2017 Scoping Plan Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis SB 350: The Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 increases the standards of the California RPS program by requiring that the amount of electricity generated and sold to retail customers per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to 50 percent by 2030.A Required measures include: • Increase RPS to 50 percent of retail sales by 2030. • Establish annual targets for statewide energy efficiency savings and demand reduction that will achieve a cumulative doubling of statewide energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas end uses by 2030. • Reduce GHG emissions in the electricity sector through the implementation of the above measures and other actions as modeled in IRPs to meet GHG emissions reductions planning targets in the IRP process. Load-serving entities and publicly owned utilities meet GHG emissions reductions planning targets through a combination of measures as described in IRPs. CPUC, CEC, CARB Consistent. SCE is required to generate electricity that would increase renewable energy resources to 33 percent by 2020 and 50 percent by 2030. As SCE would provide electricity service to the Project, by 2030, the Project would use electricity consistent with the requirement of SB 350. As discussed earlier, SCE is positioned to receive at least 33 percent of electricity from renewable source by 2020. As required under SB 350, doubling the energy efficiency savings from final end uses of retail customers by 2030 would primarily rely on the existing suite of building energy efficiency standards under CCR Title 24, Part 6 (consistency with this regulation is discussed below) and utility- sponsored programs such as rebates for high-efficiency appliances, HVAC systems, and insulation. As discussed earlier, the Project would comply with CalGreen and Title 24 energy efficiency standards. Implement Mobile Source Strategy (Cleaner Technology and Fuels) • At least 1.5 million zero emission and plug-in hybrid light- duty electric vehicles by 2025. • • At least 4.2 million zero emission and plug-in hybrid light- duty electric vehicles by 2030. • • Further increase GHG stringency on all light-duty vehicles beyond existing Advanced Clean Cars regulations. CARB, CalSTA, SGC, CalTrans, CEC, OPR, Local agencies Consistent. CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars Program in 2012 that establishes an emissions control program for model year 2017 through 2025. Standards under the Advanced Clean Cars Program likely will apply to all passenger and light duty trucks used by Project users, depending on the outcome of ongoing negotiations between CARB and EPA regarding federal standards. The program also requires auto manufacturers to produce an increasing number of zero emission vehicles in the 2018 through 2025 model years. Extension of the Advanced Clean Cars Program has not yet been adopted, but it is expected that measures will be introduced to increase GHG emissions Page 97 Table 16 Consistency Analysis – 2017 Scoping Plan Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis • Medium- and heavy-duty GHG Phase 2. • • Innovative Clean Transit: Transition to a suite of to-be- determined innovative clean transit options. Assumed 20 percent of new urban buses purchased beginning in 2018 will be zero emission buses with the penetration of zero- emission technology ramped up to 100 percent of new sales in 2030. Also, new natural gas buses, starting in 2018, and diesel buses, starting in 2020, meet the optional heavy-duty low-NOx standard. • • Last Mile Delivery: New regulation that would result in the use of low NOx or cleaner engines and the deployment of increasing numbers of zero-emission trucks primarily for class 3-7 last mile delivery trucks in California. This measure assumes ZEVs comprise 2.5 percent of new Class 3–7 truck sales in local fleets starting in 2020, increasing to 10 percent in 2025 and remaining flat through 2030. • • Further reduce VMT through continued implementation of SB 375 and regional Sustainable Communities Strategies; forthcoming statewide implementation of SB 743; and potential additional VMT reduction strategies not specified in the Mobile Source Strategy but included in the document “Potential VMT Reduction Strategies for Discussion. reductions stringency on light duty autos and continue adding zero emission and plug in vehicles through 2030. CARB is also developing the Innovative Clean Transit measure to encourage the purchase of advanced technology buses, such as alternative fueled or battery powered buses. This would allow fleets to phase in cleaner technology in the near future. CARB is also in the process of developing proposals for new approaches and strategies to achieve zero emission trucks under the Advanced Clean Local Trucks (Last Mile Delivery) Program.B,C The Project’s consistency with SCAG’s 2016-2040 RTP/SCS is discussed throughout this analysis. As implementation of the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS is expected to fulfill and exceed the region’s obligation under SB 375, the Project’s consistency with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS also ensures its consistency with SB 375. Increase Stringency of SB 375 Sustainable Communities Strategy (2035 Targets) CARB Consistent. Under SB 375, CARB sets regional targets for GHG emissions reductions from passenger vehicles. In 2010, CARB established targets for 2020 and 2035 for each region. As required under SB 375, CARB is required to update regional GHG emissions targets every eight years. As part of the 2018 updates, CARB proposed a passenger- Page 98 Table 16 Consistency Analysis – 2017 Scoping Plan Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis vehicles related GHG reduction of 19 percent for 2035 for the SCAG region, which is more stringent than the current reduction target of 13 percent for 2035. As discussed, the Project would be consistent with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS and by extension SB 375. By 2019, develop pricing policies to support low-GHG transportation (e.g. low-emission vehicles zones for heavy duty, road use, parking pricing, transit discounts) CalSTA, Caltrans, CTC, OPR/SGC, CARB Consistent. The Project would support this policy as code required parking spaces would be consistent with Title 24, which contains requirements for supporting electric vehicle charging stations. Adopt a Low Carbon Fuel Standard with a CI reduction of 18 percent. CARB Consistent. This regulatory program applies to fuel suppliers not directly to land use development. GHG emissions related to vehicular travel associated with the Project would benefit from this regulation because fuel used by Project-related vehicles would be required to comply with LCFS. The current LCFS, adopted in 2007, requires a reduction of at least 10 percent in the carbon intensity (CI) of California’s transportation fuels by 2020. On September 27, 2017, CARB amended the LCFS regulation to target a 20 percent reduction in CI from a 2010 baseline by 2030. Implement the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy by 2030: • 40 percent reduction in methane and hydrofluorocarbon emissions below 2013 levels. • 50 percent reduction in black carbon emissions below 2013 levels. CARB, CalRecycle, CDFA, SWRCB, Local air districts Consistent. SB 605 was adopted in 2014 and directs CARB to develop a comprehensive Short-Lived Climate Pollutant (SLCP) strategy. SB 1383 was later adopted in 2016 to require CARB to set statewide 2030 emissions reduction targets of 40 percent for methane and hydrofluorocarbons and 50 percent black carbon emissions below 2013 levels.D The Project would comply with the CARB SLCP Reduction Strategy, which limits the use of hydrofluorocarbons for refrigeration uses. A SB 350 (2015-2016 Regular Session) Stats 2015, Ch. 547. Page 99 Table 16 Consistency Analysis – 2017 Scoping Plan Update Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Project Consistency Analysis B CARB, Advance Clean Cars, Midterm Review. www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/acc/acc-mtr.htm. C CARB, Advanced Clean Local Trucks (Last mile delivery and local trucks). www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/actruck/actruck.htm. D CARB, Reducing Short-Lived Climate Pollutants in California, www.arb.ca.gov/cc/shortlived/shortlived.htm. Table 17 Consistency with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Consistency Analysis Land Use Strategies Reflect the changing population and demands, including combating gentrification and displacement, by increasing housing supply at a variety of affordability levels. Local jurisdictions. Consistent. The Project would consist of a memory care/assisted living facility containing 36 beds that would add to the supply of housing in metropolitan Orange County. Focus new growth around transit. Local jurisdictions. Consistent. The Project would be located at the forefront of an emerging HQTA that is projected to encompass the Project area by 2040, according to the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. The Project is located within 350 feet of OCTA 59 bus stops. This line provides direct service to the Orange Transportation Center and Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, both of which are Metrolink stations and major hubs for local and regional bus lines. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the 2016- 2040 RTP/SCS strategy of focusing growth near transit facilities. Plan for growth around livable corridors, including growth on the Livable Corridors network. SCAG, local jurisdictions. Consistent. The Project is an infill development that would be consistent with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS strategy of focusing Page 100 Table 17 Consistency with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Actions and Strategies Responsible Party(ies) Consistency Analysis growth near transit facilities and along the 2,980 miles of Livable Corridors in the region. Provide more options for short trips through Neighborhood Mobility Areas and Complete Communities. SCAG, local jurisdictions. Consistent. Given that the Project proposes a memory care/assisted living facility, it is unclear to what degree the benefits of Neighborhood Mobility Areas and Complete Communities would reduce short trips by Project residents. However, the Project is located within walking distance of nearby transit stops and a regional park. Additionally, the Project would result in a decrease of 320 daily vehicle trips as compared with the site’s existing (former) use.A Protect natural and farmlands, including developing conservation strategies. SCAG, local jurisdictions. Consistent. The Project is an infill development that would help reduce demand for growth in urbanizing areas that threaten greenfields and open spaces. Transportation Strategies Manage congestion through programs like the Congestion Management Program, Transportation Demand Management, and Transportation Systems management strategies. County transportation commissions, local jurisdictions. Consistent. The Project is an infill development that would minimize congestion impacts on the region because of its proximity to public transit. Additionally, the Project would result in a decrease of 320 daily vehicle trips as compared with the site’s existing (former use). Technological Innovation and 21st Century Transportation Promote zero-emission vehicles. SCAG, local jurisdictions. Consistent. While this action/strategy is not necessarily applicable on a project-specific basis, the Project would be consistent with the EV parking requirements set forth by Title 24. A Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis – Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Page 101 City of Orange General Plan As discussed in the Natural Resources Element of the City’s General Plan, the City has established a GHG emissions reduction goal of at least 15 percent of 2010 levels by 2020. To achieve this goal, the General Plan advocates primarily compact “infill” future development, focusing on introducing urban-scale mixed- use projects at locations near transportation corridors and transit, and creating additional retail and employment opportunities within the City that increase the range of goods and services available to residents and improve the community’s jobs-housing balance. The General Plan includes a broad spectrum of policies related to climate change. These policies have been integrated throughout the relevant General Plan elements, as detailed in Table NR-1 in the Natural Resources Element. Consistency of the Project with applicable policies from this table are discussed on Table 18. As discussed there, the Project would be substantially consistent with the City’s climate change policies. Table 18 Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Natural Resources Element Policy Consistency Discussion Issue: Community form Topic: Compact Development Land Use Element 1.1: Jobs and housing balance Urban Design Element 1.1: Pedestrian-oriented places and connections 1.5: Street-oriented development, parking and commercial activities Consistent. The Project would provide an employment source near housing and on a street with transit options for non-motorized users of the site, including pedestrians. The Project Site is also located approximately 3,500 feet southwest of the Orange Transportation Center. The Project’s parking would be situated at the back of the proposed building, away from the Glassell Street. Issue: Community form Topic: Commercial use locations Urban Design Element 6.1: Development standards for high quality building and site design integrated with infrastructure and circulation. 6.2: Infill development to benefit surrounding corridors/neighborhoods… Economic Development Element 4.2: Reduce land, infrastructure and environmental deficiencies within commercial corridors. Consistent. The Project includes the infill development of a site that is currently developed with a vacant restaurant building and surface parking area. As discussed in response to Checklist Question 1(c) (Aesthetics – Scenic Quality Regulations), the design of the Project would compliment the surrounding neighborhood and would be subject to Design Review approval by the City to ensure the Project complies with applicable design standards. Page 102 Table 18 Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Natural Resources Element Policy Consistency Discussion Issue: Renewable Energy Topic: Reduced fossil fuel reliance Natural Resources Element 2.2: Alternative transportation modes, alternative technologies, and bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods. Consistent. Although the Project Site is not currently located within a SCAG-designated HQTA, the site is in an area that is at the forefront of an emerging HQTA, projected to encompass the Project Site area by 2040, according to the 2016- 2040 RTP/SCS. The OCTA 59 bus route, which includes stops within 350 feet of the Project Site, provides service generally along the Glassell Street/Grand Avenue corridor between University of California Irvine and Anaheim. This line provides direct service to the Orange Transportation Center and Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, both of which are Metrolink stations and major hubs for local and regional bus lines. The OCTA 59 bus route has approximately a 25-minute service frequency during peak commute hours. The Project Site is also located approximately 3,500 feet southwest of the Orange Transportation Center. Issue: Transit Topic: Adequate transit to employment centers Circulation & Mobility Element 3.3: Incorporate transit-oriented design within commercial, employment, medium density residential, and mixed-use areas. Consistent. Although the Project Site is not currently located within a SCAG-designated HQTA, the site is in an area that is at the forefront of an emerging HQTA, projected to encompass the Project Site area by 2040, according to the 2016- 2040 RTP/SCS. The OCTA 59 bus route, which includes stops within 350 feet of the Project Site, provides service generally along the Glassell Street/Grand Avenue corridor between University of California Irvine and Anaheim. This line provides direct service to the Orange Transportation Center and Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, both of which are Metrolink stations and major hubs for local and regional bus lines. The OCTA 59 bus route has approximately a 25-minute service frequency during peak commute hours. The Project Site is also located approximately 3,500 feet southwest of the Orange Transportation Center. Issue: Transit Topic: Non-motorized transporation Noise Element 2.3: Alternative transportation modes to minimize traffic noise. Consistent. Although the Project Site is not currently located within a SCAG-designated HQTA, the site is in an area that is at the forefront of an emerging HQTA, projected to encompass the Project Site area by 2040, according to the 2016- 2040 RTP/SCS. The OCTA 59 bus route, which includes stops within 350 feet of the Project Site, provides service generally along the Glassell Street/Grand Avenue corridor between University Page 103 Table 18 Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Natural Resources Element Policy Consistency Discussion of California Irvine and Anaheim. This line provides direct service to the Orange Transportation Center and Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, both of which are Metrolink stations and major hubs for local and regional bus lines. The OCTA 59 bus route has approximately a 25-minute service frequency during peak commute hours. The Project Site is also located approximately 3,500 feet southwest of the Orange Transportation Center. As discussed in response to Checklist Question 13(a) (Noise – Increase in Noise Levels), the Project’s traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. Issue: Transportation Topic: Shorten travel distances Growth Management Element 2.4: Infill development and mixed-use opportunities wherever possible as developable space becomes more limited. Consistent. The Project includes the infill development of a site that is currently developed with a vacant restaurant building and surface parking area. Issue: Air Quality Topic: Reduce vehicle emissions Natural Resources Element 2.1: Implement and enforce regional air quality management plans. 2.2: Support alternative transportation modes, alternative technologies, and bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods. Consistent. As discussed in response to Checklist Question 3(a) (Air Quality – AQMP Consistency), the Project would be consistent with the AQMP. Through the Project Site’s location on Glassell Street, which is well served by transit, the Project is pedestrian friendly. Issue: Water Management Topic: Water use efficiency and reduced consumption Natural Resources Element 2.14: Reduce pollutant runoff from new development through use of Best Management Practices. Consistent. As discussed in response to Checklist Question 10(a) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Water Quality), the Project would incorporate best management practices (BMPs) to ensure that no significant water quality impacts would occur. With the exception of some small landscaped areas, the Project Site is currently entirely developed with impervious surfaces. Under post- Project conditions, the Project Site would remain almost entirely impervious. However, as shown on Page 104 Table 18 Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Natural Resources Element Policy Consistency Discussion 2.15: Minimize impervious surfaces and associated urban runoff pollutants in new development and redevelopment. Table 21 under response to Checklist Question 10(c) i) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Drainage), under the post-Project conditions, the amount of runoff from the Project Site would be controlled to below existing runoff levels. Source: Table NR-1, Natural Resources Element, City of Orange General Plan. Conclusion In summary, the plan consistency analysis provided above demonstrates that the Project complies with the plans, policies, regulations, and GHG reduction actions/strategies outlined in the Climate Change Scoping Plan and First Update, the 2017 Scoping Plan Update, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, and the City’s General Plan. Consistency with the above plans, policies, regulations, and GHG reduction actions/strategies would reduce the Project’s incremental contribution to global and statewide GHG emissions. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation or an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of GHG. Furthermore, because the Project is consistent and does not conflict with these plans, policies, and regulations, the Project’s GHG emissions would not result in a significant impact on the environment, and Project-specific impacts with regard to climate change would be less than significant. Project Emissions As discussed above, compliance with applicable GHG emissions reductions plans renders a Project less than significant. In support of the consistency analysis provided above, the following quantitative calculations of the Project’s GHG emissions are provided. The Project would result in direct and indirect GHG emissions generated by the following emissions sources: • Construction: emissions associated with construction-related equipment and vehicle use. • Area Source: emissions associated with the on-site use of landscape and other powered equipment. • Energy Source: emissions associated with the Project’s electricity and natural gas use for space heating and cooling, water heating, energy consumption, and lighting. • Mobile Source: emissions associated with the Project’s related vehicle travel. • Water/Wastewater: emissions associated with energy used to pump, convey, deliver, and treat water. Page 105 Construction Project construction is anticipated to last 18 months between 2020 and 2021. A summary of construction details (e.g. schedule, equipment mix, and vehicular trips) and CalEEMod modeling output files are provided in Appendix A. The GHG emissions associated with the construction of the Project were calculated for the 17 months of construction activity. A summary of GHG emissions for each year of construction is presented on Table 19. Table 19 Construction-Related GHG Emissions Year Emissions (MTCO2e) 2020 282 2021 112 Total 394 Amortized over 30 years 13.1 Source: NTEC, 2019. As shown on Table 19, construction of the Project is estimated to generate a total of 394 MTCO2e. As recommended by the SCAQMD, the total GHG construction emissions were amortized over the 30-year lifetime of the Project (i.e. total construction GHG emissions were divided by 30 to determine an annual construction emissions estimate that can be added to the Project’s annual operational emissions) in order to determine the Project’s annual GHG emissions inventory.27 This results in annual Project construction emissions of 13.1 MTCO2e. Operations As shown on Table 20, the Project is estimated to generate approximately 330 MTCO2e per year, including the addition of its annualized construction-related GHG emissions. As the site’s existing use was estimated to generate approximately 866 MTCO2e per year, development of the Project would result in a net decrease of site-associated GHG emissions. 27 SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda Item 31. December 5, 2008. Page 106 Table 20 Annual GHG Emissions Summary Source Emissions (MTCO2e) Area 1 Energy 63 Mobile 222 Solid Waste 15 Water/Wastewater 16 Construction 13 Total Emissions 330 Source: NTEC, 2019. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts The analysis of GHG emissions impacts, above, is a cumulative analysis. As discussed, the Project’s GHG emissions impacts would not be cumulatively considerable. Page 107 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? R (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? R (c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? R (d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? R (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? R (f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? R (g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? The City follows the County’s Hazardous Materials Inspection and Enforcement Plan. To prevent accidents, and ensure proper handling, routine inspections are conducted at businesses within the City that store, use, or handle hazardous materials. The City concentrates production of hazardous materials within its industrial area, separated from residential areas, educational uses, and institutional facilities. The City also identifies businesses transporting, manufacturing, using, and storing hazardous chemicals, and requires such Page 108 businesses to exercise caution and to mitigate potential negative effects on surrounding land uses prior to obtaining businesses licenses.28 During the Project’s construction phase, construction equipment would use limited amounts of hazardous and flammable substances such as petroleum products like gasoline, diesel fuel, and petroleum-based oils. During construction, this equipment may require maintenance that could result in releases of oil, diesel fuel, transmission fluid, or other materials. However, BMPs included in the Project’s required SWPPP would be implemented to address handling and containment of any hazardous substances during the construction phase of the Project. Compliance with these requirements would avoid significant hazard to public or environment through release of hazardous materials during Project construction. As a memory care facility, the types of hazardous materials that would be used at the facility would include cleaning supplies and lawn/landscaping fertilizers/pesticides that are typical of a residential use. The facility could require the need for medical waste disposal, for used needles and unused medicine. However, the operators of the facility would be required to comply with existing regulations outlined in Sections 117600- 118360 of the California Health and Safety Code to ensure safe and proper disposal. Through compliance with existing regulations, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Therefore, Project impacts related to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? The section is based in part on the following (refer to Appendix F): • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Leighton Consulting, Inc., October 24, 2018. • Limited Phase II Environemtnal Site Assessment, Leighton Consulting, Inc., September 6, 2019. Leighton Consulting, Inc. (Leighton) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Project Site to identify, to the extent feasible and pursuant to the processes prescribed in ASTM International (ASTM) E1527-13, recognized environmental conditions (RECs), historical RECs (HRECs), or controlled RECs (CRECs) in connection with the Project Site. RECs are defined, according to ASTM E1527-13 as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) 28 Page PS-20, Orange General Plan: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan--- Public-Safety-Element-PDF. Page 109 under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not RECs.” HRECs are defined, according to ASTM E1527-13 as “a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls.” CRECs are defined, according to ASTM E1527-13 as “a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject of the implementation of required controls.” The Phase I ESA revealed no evidence of RECs, HRECs, or CRECs in connection with the Project Site, except for the following: • The historic use of the Project Site as an orchard from at least 1938 until approximately 1960 and the potential use of pesticides associated with this historic land use. No evidence of CRECs or HRECs was identified for the Project Site. Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA, Leighton recommended the following: • Collect soil samples from the Project Site to assess the presence of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and arsenic in the near-surface soil. As a result of the findings of the Phase I ESA, Leighton conducted a Limited Phase II ESA to determine what, if any, environmental impacts are present in the near surface soil as a result of the historic use of the Project Site, which could affect future redevelopment of the site. The Phase II ESA concluded that soil sample analytical results indicate that soil in the southwest portion of the Project Site, in the vicinity of boring LB1, contains dieldrin at concentrations exceeding the Residential Screening Levels (RSL) for residential land use. The exceedances of dieldrin are primarily limited to soil samples collected at a depth of 0.5 feet bgs, with the exception of LB1-SW1-2.5 at 2.5 feet bgs. The northwestern lateral extent of the dieldrin-impacted soil is not well defined due to limitations posed by the current onsite structure. However, borings LB2, LB7, and LB8 provide a rough estimate of lateral delineation and indicate that the dieldrin-impacted soil is confined to the southeast portion of the Project Site. Arsenic was detected in near surface soil samples throughout the Project Site at concentrations ranging from 1.9 milogram/kilogram (mg/kg) to 19 m/kg. Excluding arsenic data collected from boring LB1 (which is recommended for removal based on co-located elevated dieldrin concentrations), the 95 percent Upper Confidence Level (UCL) of the population mean for arsenic was calculated to be 11.22 mg/kg. Based on the results of statistical analysis, arsenic in near surface soil at the Project Site is not considered a contaminant of concern and not anticipated to pose a significant health risk to future Project residents/users. Page 110 To ensure that Project impacts related to dieldrin-impacted soil are less than significant, the Project Applicant will implement Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, which includes excavation and off-site disposal of soil to a depth of approximately 2 feet bgs in the southeastern corner of the Project Site. Deeper removals may be necessary in the vicinity of step-out boring LB1-SW2 and can be confirmed during removal activities. Upon completion of removal activities, confirmation soil samples would be collected from the resulting excavation area to ensure that the dieldrin-impacted soil has been effectively removed. All work would be completed under the oversight of a California-registered Professional Geologist or Engineer with environmental consulting experience. Given the age of the existing restaurant building on the Project Site, it is possible that the building could contain asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint (LBP). As such, the Project Applicant will implement Mitigation Measures HAZ-2 and HAZ-3, which includes the identification and abatement of ACMs and LBP by qualified professionals. Thus, with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 HAZ-2, and HAZ-3, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, and impacts related to this issue would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the soils in the southeastern corner of the Project Site, as indicated on Figure 2 of the Limited Phase II ESA dated September 6, 2019, shall be excavated to a depth of approximately 2 feet bgs. Deeper removals may be necessary in the vicinity of step-out boring LB1-SW2 and shall be confirmed by a California-registered Professional Geologist or Engineer with environmental consulting experience during removal activities (refer to Figure 2 of the Limited Phase II ESA dated September 6, 2019). Upon completion of removal activities, confirmation soil samples will be collected from the resulting excavation area to ensure that the dieldrin-impacted soil has been effectively removed. All work will be completed under the oversight of a California-registered Professional Geologist or Engineer with environmental consulting experience. All excavated soil shall be disposed of at an appropriate landfill or other waste receival facility. HAZ-2: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified professional to identify any ACMs in the existing building. If ACMs are identified, abatement of the ACMs shall conducted by a qualified professional in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. HAZ-3: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified professional to identify any LBP in the existing building. If LBP is identified, abatement of the LBP shall conducted by a qualified professional in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Page 111 (c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The Holy Family Cathedral School is located adjacent to the Project Site to the north. However, as discussed previously in response to Checklist Question 3(d) (Air Quality – Sensitive Receptors) and in response to Checklist Question 8(a) (Hazards and Hazardous Materials – Hazardous Materials), the proposed memory care facility would not emit hazardous emission or handle hazardous materials. The operators of the facility would be required to comply with existing regulations outlined in Sections 117600-118360 of the California Health and Safety Code to ensure safe and proper disposal. Through compliance with existing regulations, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Thus, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? California Government Code Section 65962.5 requires various state agencies to compile lists of hazardous waste disposal facilities, unauthorized release from underground storage tanks, contaminated drinking water wells, and solid waste facilities from which there is known migration of hazardous waste. In meeting the provisions in Government Code Section 65962.5, commonly referred to as the “Cortese List,” database resources that provide information regarding identified facilities or sites include EnviroStor, GeoTracker, and other lists compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency. A review of the EnviroStor database shows that the Project Site is not listed. Thus, the Project would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5.29 Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None 29 Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor, https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/, August 5, 2019 Page 112 (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The airport closest to the Project Site is the John Wayne Airport located approximately 9.5 miles south of the Project Site. The Project Site is not located within an airport land use plan. Thus, the Project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Emergency Operations Plan The City has an emergency plan, which establishes emergency preparedness and emergency response procedures for both peacetime and wartime disasters. The plan is termed an “Emergency Operations Plan,” prepared in accordance with the State Office of Emergency Services guidelines for multi-hazard functional planning. The plan consists of three parts: 1) a basic plan; 2) annexes which address specific functions and duties of response agencies; and 3) a directory of emergency response resources. Rather than focusing on specific responses for specific hazards, the City’s plan concentrates on specific agency response for any type of disaster. For example, in the event of an earthquake, flood, or industrial accident, the Orange Fire Department is responsible for fire suppression, emergency medical care, and rescue operations. 30 Emergency Shelters The nearest Primary Site for Emergency Shelters/Assembly Points is Orange High School located at 525 N. Shaffer Street, approximately 1.6 miles north of the Project Site. All elementary schools Citywide are considered Secondary Sites.31 The nearest elementary school to the Project Site is the Holy Family Cathedral School, located adjacent to the Project Site to the north. Emergency Access and Evacuation All City arterials are recognized as primary emergency response routes. In addition, non-arterials can be secondary emergency response routes. The City’s Residential Neighborhood Traffic Management Program, 30 Orange General Plan, page PS-26: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan--- Public-Safety-Element-PDF. 31 Orange General Plan, Table PS-3, Emergency Shelters/Assembly Points: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan---Public-Safety-Element-PDF. Page 113 which identifies traffic management and traffic calming tools, specifies that emergency vehicle access should be accommodated consistent with response standards with implementation of appropriate traffic management measures. Additionally, if current emergency vehicle access does not meet existing response standards, traffic calming efforts should not further degrade response times. The City’s Emergency Operations Plan does not indicate evacuation routes for emergency situations. The routes of escape from disaster-stricken areas would depend on the scale and scope of the disaster. Glassell Street is the closest designated evacuation corridor to the Project Site, running adjacent to the site to the east.32 The Project would not affect access to this street during construction, because all construction equipment and vehicles would be staged on the Project Site and not on the street. The Project would not affect emergency access. Construction and internal circulation would comply with the applicable fire codes, as required by the Orange Fire Department. Thus, the Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, Project impacts related to interference with an emergency response or evacuation plan would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? The Project Site is not located within a Wildland High Fire Hazard area or Wildland Very High Fire Hazard area.33 Thus, the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. Impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials are site-specific. The City gauges such impacts on a project-by-project basis. As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts 32 Orange General Plan, Figure PS-4, Generalized Evacuation Corridors: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan---Public-Safety-Element-PDF. 33 Orange General Plan, Figure PS-1, Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Map: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan---Public-Safety-Element-PDF. Page 114 related to hazards or hazardous materials. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant. Page 115 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? R (b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? R (c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would: i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site; R ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off site; R iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or R iv) impede or redirect flood flows. R (d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seich zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? R (e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? R (f) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? R (g) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post- construction activities? R (h) Would the project result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? R (i) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? R Page 116 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (j) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? R (k) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? The discussion below is based in part on the following (refer to Appendix G): • Preliminary Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Pasco Laret Suiter & Associates, Inc., February 2019, Revised May 2019. Construction Clearing, grading, excavation, and construction activities associated with the Project may impact water quality due to sheet erosion of exposed soils and subsequent deposition of particulates into local drainages, if construction occurs during a storm event. Grading activities, in particular, lead to temporarily exposed areas of loose soil, as well as sediment stockpiles, that can become susceptible to uncontrolled sheet flow, if left uncovered during a storm event. Although erosion occurs naturally in the environment, primarily from weathering by water and wind action, improperly managed construction activities can lead to substantially accelerated rates of erosion that are considered detrimental to the environment. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant would be required to comply with City and local construction requirements and provide a Notice of Intent (NOI) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) Number issued from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in accordance with the requirements of the General Construction Permit to ensure the potential for soil erosion and construction impacts are minimized. In accordance with the General Construction Permit (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ), the following Permit Registration Documents (PRDs) are required to be submitted to the SWRCB prior to commencement of construction activities: • Notice of Intent; • Risk Assessment (Standard or Site-Specific); • Site Map; Page 117 • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); and • Annual Fee and Certification. Construction BMPs In accordance with the General Construction Permit, a construction SWPPP must be prepared and implemented for the Project Site, and revised as necessary, as administrative or physical conditions change. The SWPPP must be made available for review upon request, will describe construction BMPs that address pollutant source reduction, and provide measures/controls necessary to mitigate potential pollutant sources. These measures/controls include, but are not limited to: erosion controls, sediment controls, tracking controls, non-storm water management, materials & waste management, and good housekeeping practices, including the following: • Erosion control BMPs, such as hydraulic mulch, soil binders, and geotextiles and mats, protect the soil surface by covering and/or binding the soil particles. Temporary earth dikes or drainage swales may also be employed to divert runoff away from exposed areas and into more suitable locations. If implemented correctly, erosion controls can effectively reduce the sediment loads entrained in storm water runoff from construction sites. • Sediment controls, such as silt fencing and gravel bag berms, are designed to intercept and filter out soil particles that have been detached and transported by the force of water. All storm drain inlets on the Project Site or within the Project Site vicinity (i.e., along the street immediately adjacent to the Project Site) should be adequately protected with an impoundment (i.e., gravel bags) around the inlet and equipped with a sediment filter (i.e., fiber roll). Bags should also be placed around areas of soil disturbing activities, such as grading or clearing. • Stabilize all construction entrance/exit points along Glassell Street to reduce the tracking of sediments onto adjacent streets by proper implementation of crushed aggregate and rumble racks as outlined within CASQA BMP sheet TC-1. Wind erosion controls such as wind screens and/or watering should be employed in conjunction with tracking controls. • Non-storm water management BMPs prohibit the discharge of materials other than storm water, as well as reduce the potential for pollutants from discharging at their source. Examples include avoiding paving and grinding operations during the rainy season (i.e., October 1 through April 30 each year) where feasible, and performing any vehicle equipment cleaning, fueling, and maintenance in designated areas that are adequately protected and contained. • Waste management consists of implementing procedural and structural BMPs for collecting, handling, storing and disposing of wastes generated by a construction project to prevent the release of waste materials into storm water discharges. Examples include concrete waste management, solid waste management, and sanitary septic waste management. Page 118 • Prior to commencement of construction activities, the General Construction Permit requires the Project SWPPP to be prepared in accordance with the site-specific sediment risk analyses, with erosion and sediment controls proposed for each phase of construction for the Project. The phases of construction would define the maximum amount of soil disturbed, the appropriately sized sediment basins (if necessary) and other control measures to accommodate all active soil disturbance areas and the appropriate monitoring and sampling plans. All selected BMPs for Erosion and Sediment Control will be shown on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan(s) and the SWPPP documents. Post-Construction BMPs The Project includes demolition and removal of the existing restaurant building, surface parking area, and all other structures from the Project Site and development of the Project Site with a memory care facility, which includes on-site circulation and a surface parking area. The pollutants of concern for water quality are those pollutants that are anticipated (expected) or potentially could be generated by the Project, based on past and proposed land uses, along with those pollutants that have been identified by regulatory agencies as potentially impairing beneficial uses in receiving water bodies. Based on the proposed memory care use for the Project, the following pollutants could be expected: suspended solids/sediment, nutrients, heavy metals, pathogens (bacteria/virus), pesticides, oil and grease, toxic organic compounds, and trash and debris. The primary potential sources for these pollutants would be any areas traveled by vehicles, the parking area, and trash/recycling areas. The BMPs proposed for the Project would address these pollutants, if they are present. To help prevent long-term water quality impacts associated with land use changes and in accordance with the requirements of the City and consistency with the regional Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) storm water permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) (Order No. R8-2009-0030, amended by Order No. R8-2010-0062; NPDES Permit No. CAS618030), new development and significant redevelopment projects must prepare and implement a project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) aimed at reducing pollutants in post-development runoff. Specifically, a project-specific WQMP includes RWQCB approved BMPs, where applicable, that address post- construction management of storm water runoff water quality. As part of the WQMP, projects must incorporate low impact development (LID), site design and source control BMPs to address post- construction storm water runoff management. In addition, new development and redevelopment projects are required to implement site design/LID and source control BMPs applicable to their specific priority project categories, as well as implement treatment control BMPs where necessary. Selection of LID and additional treatment control BMPs is based on the pollutants of concern for the specific project site and the BMP’s ability to effectively treat those pollutants, in consideration of site conditions and constraints. In the proposed condition, storm water runoff from the majority of the Project Site would be collected in a cross gutter and conveyed to a storm water BMP facility consisting of a Modular Wetland System pretreatment unit and underground perforated storage infiltration tank located in the western portion of the site. Runoff from the courtyard area along the south side of the building would be collected and conveyed in proposed storm drain to the same BMP facility. The BMP facility would provide water quality treatment Page 119 and retention via infiltration for the Project Design Capture Volume (DCV). In larger storm events, overflow would discharge from the pretreatment unit via a secondary storm drain, which would convey overflow to a pop-up drain emitter located on the neighboring property. When pressurized, the pop-up drain will allow overflow to drain out and sheet flow southerly as it does in the existing condition. The overall approach to water quality treatment for the Project would include the incorporation of site design/LID strategies and source control measures throughout the sites in a systematic manner that maximizes the use of LID features to provide treatment of storm water and reduce runoff. LID BMPs are engineered facilities that are designed to retain or biotreat runoff on the Project Site. The current term MS4 Storm Water Permit requires the evaluation and use of LID features using the following hierarchy of treatment: infiltration, evapotranspiration, harvest/reuse, and biotreatment, etc. The full LID Design Storm Capture Volume for the Project would be met with the use of a storm water BMP facility consisting of a Modular Wetland System pretreatment unit and underground perforated storage infiltration tank. As stated above, storm water runoff would flow to the Modular Wetland System for pretreatment and continue to the underground perforated storage tank for infiltration. Thus, with the compliance to regulatory requirements and the BMPs established for the Project in a final Water Quality Management Plan, Project construction and operation would not result in a violation of any water quality standard, Therefore, Project impacts related to water quality would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? With the exception of some small landscaped areas, the Project Site is entirely developed with impervious surfaces. During storm events, water flows from the Project Site to the local storm drain system and does not infiltrate at the Project Site to groundwater levels. The Project Site is not a source of groundwater recharge. Under post-Project conditions, the Project Site would remain almost entirely impervious. Thus, the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Therefore, impacts related to this issue would be less than significant. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Page 120 (c) i) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site? Runoff from the Project Site discharges to Santiago Creek Channel, which flows to the Santa Ana River, which discharges to the Pacific Ocean. At the location where the Project Site discharges to the Santiago Creek Channel and confluences with the Santa Ana River, both channels are stabilized. This discharge condition would remain the same under the proposed condition. Table 21 shows the pre-development and post-development discharge for the Project Site for the indicated frequency of storm (Q2). Table 21 2-Year Storm Event Information Condition Volume (acre feet) Velocity (feet/second) Time of Concentration (minute) Pre-Development 0.11 1.16 7.94 Post-Development 0.09 1.13 8.37 Source: Pasco Laret Suiter & Associates, Inc., May 2019. Refer to Appendix G. As shown, under the post-development condition, the Project would result in a reduction in the overall amount and velocity of runoff from the Project Site for Q2 storm events when compared to the existing condition. As under the existing condition, runoff from the Project Site would be controlled as to not result in downstream erosion or siltation. Thus, the Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site. Therefore, Project impacts related to erosion and siltation would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) ii) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in flooding on or off site? No streams or rivers are located near the Project Site. With the exception of small landscaped areas, the Project Site is entirely developed with impervious surfaces, during storm events, runoff from the Project Site enters the City local storm drain system. Under post-Project conditions, the Project Site also would be almost entirely impervious, and the amount and velocity of runoff from the Project Site would be somewhat less than under the existing condition (refer to Table 21). The Project would not increase the amount of runoff from the Project Site and would not cause flooding. Thus, the Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off site. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Page 121 Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) iii) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? As discussed above, with the exception of small landscaped areas, the Project Site is entirely developed with impervious surfaces, during storm events, runoff from the Project Site enters the City local storm drain system. Under post-Project conditions, the Project Site also would be almost entirely impervious, and the amount and velocity of runoff from the Project Site would be somewhat less than under the existing condition (refer to Table 21). The Project would not increase the amount of runoff from the Project Site and would not exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain. Additionally, the Project Applicant would be required to design the hydrology for the Project Site to meet the City’s storm runoff requirements. Refer to response to Checklist Question 10(a) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Water Quality) regarding the Project’s less-than-significant impacts related to water quality. Thus, the Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Therefore, no impacts related to storm drain capacity would occur as a result of the Project, and impacts related to water quality would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) iv) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff water which would impede or redirect flood flows? The Project Site is not within a flood zone.34 Thus, the Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff water 34 Orange General Plan Program EIR, Figure 5.6-2: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR- PDF. Page 122 which would impede or redirect flood flows. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (d) In a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zone, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? As stated in response to Checklist Question 10(c) iv) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Flood Flows), the Project Site is not within a flood hazard zone. Due to the City distance from the Pacific Ocean (approximately 13 miles), the Project Site is not subject to tsunamis. Additionally, the Project Site is not located near any large bodies of water and is not subject to seiches. Portions of the City are susceptible to flood events related to dam failure resulting from a significant earthquake. The Villa Park Dam and Santiago Dam are located along Santiago Creek in the foothills of East Orange. There are substantially intervening land uses, structures, and open areas between these dams and the Project Site. Additionally, a review of the California Inundation Map maintained by the California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams, the Project Site is not within a dam inundation area.35 Additionally, the Project includes development of a memory care facility, which would not have any significant sources of pollutants. Thus, the Project would not risk release of pollutants due to project inundation. Therefore, no impacts would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management? Regarding Project impacts related to water quality, refer to response to Checklist Question 10(a) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Water Quality). Regarding Project impacts related to groundwater, refer to response to Checklist Question 10(b) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Groundwater). Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None 35 California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams, https://fmds.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=dam_prototype_v2. Page 123 (f) Would the project potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? Regarding Project impacts related to water quality, refer to response to Checklist Question 10(a) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Water Quality). Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (g) Would the project potentially impact stormwater runoff from post-construction activities? Regarding Project impacts related to water quality, refer to response to Checklist Question 10(a) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Water Quality). Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (h) Would the project result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? Regarding Project impacts related to water quality, refer to response to Checklist Question 10(a) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Water Quality). Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (i) Would the project result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? Regarding Project impacts related to water quality, refer to response to Checklist Question 10(a) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Water Quality). Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (j) Would the project create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? With the exception of small landscaped areas, the Project Site is entirely developed with impervious surfaces, during storm events, runoff from the Project Site enters the City local storm drain system. Under post-Project conditions, the Project Site also would be almost entirely impervious, and the amount and Page 124 velocity of runoff from the Project Site would be somewhat less than under the existing condition (refer to Hydro-1). The Project would not increase the amount of runoff from the Project Site and would not exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain. Additionally, the Project Applicant would be required to design the hydrology for the Project Site to meet the City’s storm runoff requirements. Thus, the Project would not create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (k) Would the project create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? Refer to response to Checklist Question 7(c) i) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Soil Erosion) for a discussion of soil erosion. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. In an urbanized area, such as the setting for the Project and cumulative projects, impacts related to hydrology and water quality are addressed by the City on a project-by-project basis. Each project is required to comply with applicable drainage and water quality standards. As discussed above, the Project’s impacts related to hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. Page 125 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Physically divide an established community? R (b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project physically divide an established community? The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City that is already served by existing well-established roadway and utility infrastructure. The Project includes development of the Project Site with a memory care facility associated with the existing senior care facility located adjacent to the south. Thus, the Project would not physically divide an established community. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Consistency with Regional Plans Southern California Association of Governments As discussed previously in response to Checklist Question 3(a) (Air Quality – AQMP Consistency), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) functions as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for six counties: Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. The SCAG region encompasses a population exceeding 18 million persons in an area of more than 38,000 square miles. As the federally-designated MPO, SCAG is mandated to research and create plans for transportation, growth management, hazardous waste management, and air quality. Applicable SCAG publications are discussed below. 2016-2040 RTP/SCS On April 7, 2016, the Regional Council of SCAG adopted the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, which includes a strong commitment to reduce emissions from transportation sources to comply with SB 375, improve public Page 126 health, and meet the NAAQS as set forth by the CAA. As such, the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS contains a regional commitment for the broad deployment of zero- and near-zero-emission transportation technologies in the 2016-2040 timeframe and clear steps to move toward this objective. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS puts forth aggressive strategies addressing technology development and deployment, energy security, cost certainty, increased public support for infrastructure, GHG emissions reduction, and economic development. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS provides a blueprint for improving quality of life for residents by providing more choices for where they will live, work, and play, and how they will move around. It is designed to promote safe, secure, and efficient transportation systems to provide improved access to opportunities, such as jobs, education, and healthcare. Its emphasis on transit and active transportation is designed to allow residents to lead a healthier, more active lifestyle. Its goal is to create jobs, ensure the region’s economic competitiveness through strategic investments in the goods movement system, and improve environmental and health outcomes for its residents by 2040. More importantly, the RTP/SCS is also designed to preserve what makes the region special, including stable and successful neighborhoods and array of open spaces for future generations. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS also includes examples of measures that could reduce impacts from planning, development, and transportation. It notes, however, that the example measures are not intended to serve as any kind of checklist to be used on a project-specific basis. Since every project and project setting is different, project-specific analysis is needed to identify applicable and feasible mitigation. These mitigation measures are particularly important where streamlining mechanisms under SB 375 are utilized. The 2016-2040 RTP/SCS plans to concentrate future development and provide higher intensity development, including residential and mixed-use development in proximity to transit hubs in order to reduce VMT and thereby reduce GHG emissions from personal vehicles. Development of the Project would reduce VMT by replacing an existing restaurant use that generates more traffic than the proposed memory care facility (refer to response to Checklist Question 17(a) [Transportation – LOS Impacts]). Additionally, as discussed in response to Checklist Questions 8(a) and (b) (Greenhouse Gas Emissions), the Project would result in a net decrease in the amount of GHG emissions generated at the Project Site when compared to the existing restaurant use. For these reasons, the Project would be consistent with the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) Refer to response to Checklist Question 3(a) (Air Quality – AQMP Consistency) for a discussion of the Project’s less-than-significant impacts related to consistency with the AQMP. Orange County Transportation Authority Orange County Congestion Management Program The Orange County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) requires that a traffic impact analysis be conducted for any project generating 2,400 or more daily trips, or 1,600 or more daily trips for projects that Page 127 directly access the CMP Highway System (HS). Per the CMP guidelines, this number is based on the desire to analyze any impacts that will be 3.0 percent or more of the existing CMP highway system facilities’ capacity. As discussed in response to Checklist Question 17(a) (Transportation – LOS Impacts), the Project would result in a net decrease in daily traffic trips when compared to the traffic generated by the existing restaurant use. By itself, the Project would generate a total of 149 daily trips. As such, the Project would not generate enough daily trips to trigger the requirements of the CMP. Thus, the Project would be consistent with the CMP. Consistency with Local Plans City of Orange General Plan State law requires that every city and county prepare and adopt a long-range comprehensive General Plan to guide future development and to identify the community’s environmental, social, and economic goals.36 The City of Orange 2010 General Plan, adopted by the City Council on March 9, 2010, contains the following 10 Elements: Land Use, Circulation & Mobility, Growth Management, Natural Resources, Public Safety, Noise, Cultural Resources & Historic Preservation, Infrastructure, Urban Design, and Economic Development. Table 22 includes a discussion of the Project’s consistency with the applicable goals and policies of the Land Use Element. As demonstrated, the Project would be consistent with the applicable goals and policies. Table 22 Project Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Land Use Element of the City of Orange General Plan Objective Project Consistency Goal 1.0: Meet the present and future needs of all residential and business sectors with a diverse and balance mix of land uses. Policy 1.1: Maintain a land use structure that balances jobs and housing with available infrastructure and public and human services. Consistent. The Project includes the infill development of a memory care facility as an extension of an existing senior living facility that would provide housing and care for residents in need and employment opportunities. The Project would be served by existing roadway, utility, and public services. Policy 1.2: Balance economic gains from new development while preserving the character and densities of residential neighborhoods. Consistent. The Project would not encroach on the character of established residential neighborhoods. The Project Site is located in an urban portion of the City, surrounded by mix of commercial, institutional, and residential uses. The proposed memory care facility would be an extension of the existing senior living facility 36 California Government Code Section 65300. Page 128 Table 22 Project Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Land Use Element of the City of Orange General Plan Objective Project Consistency located to the south. The proposed building would be two stories and 32 feet in height, consistent with heights of existing buildings adjacent to and near the Project Site. Additionally, the Project would be subject to the City’s Design Review process to ensure consistency with applicable design standards. Policy 1.3: Provide a range of housing densities and types to meet the diverse needs and lifestyles of residents. Consistent. The Project includes development of a memory care facility to serve residents in need. Policy 1.4: Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development. Consistent. The Project Site is located in an urban portion of the City, surrounded by mix of commercial, institutional, and residential uses. The proposed memory care facility would be an extension of the existing senior living facility located to the south. The proposed building would be two stories and 32 feet in height, consistent with heights of existing buildings adjacent to and near the Project Site. Additionally, the Project would be subject to the City’s Design Review process to ensure consistency with applicable design standards. Policy 1.6: Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and character of surrounding neighborhoods. Consistent. There are no residential uses adjacent to the Project Site. The Project includes infill development of the Project Site with a memory care facility that is an extension of the senior living facility to the south of the site. A church/institutional use is located to the north of the Project Site. The site is bound by a playfield to the west and S. Glassell Street to the east. The Project would not impose on the privacy or character of the surrounding neighborhood. Policy 1.7: Provide a range of open space and park amenities to meet the diverse needs of current and new residents. Consistent. The Project would include onsite amenities to serve future memory care residents. Goal 2.0: Create successful, high quality mixed-use districts consisting of a mix of residential, commercial, office, civic, and common open space land uses, supported by alternative modes of transportation. Policy 2.1: Encourage development of mixed-use projects to revitalize older commercial areas throughout the City and industrial areas surrounding the historic Santa Fe Depot. Consistent. The Project includes an infill development of the Project Site with a new memory care facility, replacing a restaurant building that is no longer operational. Policy 2.4: Encourage mixed-use projects that contain a variety of compatible uses, and provide Consistent. The Project includes development of a memory care facility that is an extension of the Page 129 Table 22 Project Consistency with Applicable Policies of the Land Use Element of the City of Orange General Plan Objective Project Consistency necessary supporting public and community facilities. existing senior living facility to the south of the Project Site. Policy 2.5: Minimize traffic and parking impacts of proposed mixed-use projects. Consistent. As described in response to Checklist Question 17(a) (Transportation – LOS Impacts), the Project would result in a net decrease in traffic trips when compared to the existing/previous restaurant use. The Project would provide adequate parking to serve the proposed use. The Project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic and parking. Policy 2.7: Ensure that the architecture, landscape design, and site planning of mixed use projects are of the highest quality, and that they emphasize a pedestrian orientation and safe, convenient access between uses. Consistent. The Project would be designed in an architectural style reflecting the eclectic mix of the area, using high quality materials. The Project would be subject to the City’s Design Review process to ensure that the Project meets applicable design standards. The Project would provide appropriate pedestrian access that meets safety standards for future memory care residents. Policy 2.8: Ensure that adequate gathering areas or plazas are incorporated within mixed-use projects and areas to allow for social interaction and community activities. Consistent. The Project would provide activity areas, lounging areas, a beauty salon, a courtyard, and covered terrace for on-site social interaction and community activities. Source: City of Orange 2010 General Plan, Land Use Element. Land Use Designation Within the General Plan, the Project Site is designated General Commercial. The Land Use Element provides the following description for the General Commercial designation: The General Commercial designation provides for a wide range of retail and service commercial uses and professional offices. This designation is found along many of the City’s most highly- traveled roadway corridors, including Katella Avenue, Chapman A venue, and Tustin Street. Regional shopping centers, mid- and high-rise office projects, corridor shopping districts, and neighborhood corner stores are all permitted uses. The proposed memory care facility is allowed under the General Commercial designation. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the land use designation for the Project Site. Page 130 Zoning The existing zoning for the Project Site is C-1 (Limited Business). The proposed memory care facility is a use that is allowed under the existing zoning with a CUP, which is requested by the Project Applicant. The Project would meet all other zoning standards for the Project Site, such as height, setbacks, floor area ratio (FAR), parking, landscaping, etc. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the existing zoning for the Project Site. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. The degree to which the cumulative projects are considered consistent with applicable plans, policies, and regulations and could result in environmental impacts is considered by the City on a project-by-project basis The applicants of each of cumulative project would be required comply with existing standards and regulations associated with sites on with the cumulative project is being proposed and/or request relief from compliance through some sort of ministerial or discretionary approval by the City. As discussed above, the Project includes development of a memory care facility, which is a use that is allowed under the existing land use designation for the Project Site and under the existing zoning pursuant to a CUP. The Project would be consistent with applicable plans, policies, and regulations associated with development of the Project Site, and no significant environmental impacts would occur. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to land use and planning would be less than significant. Page 131 12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? R (b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Mineral resource deposits in Orange are primarily limited to the sand and gravel resources contained in and along the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek. Sand and gravel resources are referred to collectively as “aggregate,” which is used for cement concrete. However, the Project Site is not within or near any area of known mineral resources. Thus, the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? The City’s General Plan Land Use Resource Area designation provides for the continued use of areas for mining and agriculture. Passive and active recreational uses are also permitted in areas with this designation. Resource Areas also serve as a holding zone for areas that are currently used for mining and agriculture, but may not have these uses in the future.37 The Project Site is designated as Commercial within the General Plan. The Project is not located within a Resource Area or Open Space area. Thus, the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local 37 Page LU-23, Orange General Plan: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/570/General-Plan--- Land-Use-PDF. Page 132 general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. None of the sites of the cumulative projects is designated for mineral resources. As discussed above, the Project would not result in any impacts related to mineral resources. Therefore, no cumulative impacts related to mineral resources would occur. Page 133 13. NOISE. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? R (b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? R (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? R Impact Analysis This section is based primarily on the following (refer to Appendix H): • Noise Modeling Results, NT Environmental Consulting, July 2019. Environmental Setting Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise Sound can be described in terms of its loudness (amplitude) and frequency (pitch). The standard unit of measurement for sound is the decibel, abbreviated dB. Because the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, the A-weighted scale (dBA) is used to reflect the normal hearing sensitivity range of the human ear. Table 23 provides examples of A-weighted noise levels from common sources. Although the terms “sound” and “noise” are often used synonymously, noise is commonly defined as sound that is either loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or undesired.38 Because decibels are logarithmic units, they cannot be simply added or subtracted. For example, two cars each producing 60 dBA of noise would not produce a combined 120 dBA. 38 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. Page 134 Table 23 A-Weighted Decibel Scale Common Noise Sources Sound Level, dBA Near Jet Engine 130 Rock and Roll Band 110 Jet Flyover at 1,000 feet 100 Power Motor 90 Food Blender 80 Living Room Music 70 Human Voice at 3 feet 60 Residential Air Conditioner at 50 feet 50 Bird Calls 40 Quiet Living Room 30 Average Whisper 20 Rustling Leaves 10 These noise levels are approximations intended for general reference and informational use. They do not meet the standard required for detailed noise analysis but are provided for the reader to gain a rudimentary concept of various noise levels. Source: Cowan, James P., Handbook of Environmental Acoustics, 1993 Noise Definitions This noise analysis discusses sound levels in terms of equivalent noise level (Leq), maximum noise level (Lmax), minimum noise level (Lmix), and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Statistical descriptors (Lx) are also discussed. Equivalent Noise Level (Leq) Leq represents the equivalent steady-state noise level for a stated period of time that would contain the same acoustic energy as the fluctuating, time-varying noise level of that same period. For example, the Leq for one hour is the energy average noise level for that hour. Leq can be thought of as a continuous noise level for a certain period that is equivalent in acoustic energy content to a fluctuating noise level of that same period. In this report Leq is expressed in units of dBA. Maximum Noise Level (Lmax) Lmax represents the highest instantaneous noise level of a specified time period. Minimum Noise Level (Lmix) Lmin represents the lowest instantaneous noise level of a specified time period. Page 135 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) CNEL is a weighted noise measurement scale of average sound level during a 24-hour period. Due to increased noise sensitivities during evening and night hours, human reaction to sound between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. is as if it were actually 5 dBA higher than had it occurred between 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. From 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., humans perceive sound as if it were 10 dBA higher. To account for these sensitivities, CNEL penalizes evening noise levels between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. by an additional 5 dBA and nighttime noise levels between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. by an additional 10 dBA. Because of this, 24-hour CNEL figures are always higher than their corresponding 24-hour Leq. Statistical Descriptor (Lx) Lx is used to represent the noise level exceeded X percent of a specified time period. For example, L90 represents the noise level that is exceeded 90 percent of a specified time period. L90 is commonly used to represent ambient or background steady-state noise levels.39 Effects of Environmental Noise The degree to which noise can impact an environment ranges from levels that interfere with speech and sleep to levels that can cause adverse health effects. Most human response to noise is subjective. Factors that influence individual responses may include the intensity, frequency, and pattern of noise; the amount of background or existing noise present; and the nature of work or human activity that is exposed to intruding noise. According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), extended or repeated exposure to sounds at or above 85 dB can cause hearing loss. Sounds of 75 dBA or less, even after continuous and repeated exposure, are unlikely to cause hearing loss.40 The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that adults should not be exposed to sudden “impulse” noise events of 140 dB or greater. For children, this limit is 120 dB.41 Exposure to elevated nighttime noise levels can disrupt sleep, leading to increased levels of fatigue and decreased work or school performance. For the preservation of healthy sleeping environments, the WHO recommends that continuous interior noise levels should not exceed 30 dBA Leq and that individual noise events of 45 dBA or higher be limited.42 39 Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 40 National Institute of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication. www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/noise-induced-hearing-loss. 41 World Health Organization, Guidelines for Community Noise, 1999. 42 Ibid. Page 136 Some epidemiological studies have shown a weak association between long-term exposure to noise levels of 65 to 70 dBA Leq or greater and cardiovascular effects, including ischaemic heart disease and hypertension. However, at this time, the relationship is largely inconclusive. It is generally accepted that people with normal hearing sensitivity can barely perceive a 3 dBA change in noise levels, though if changes occur to the character of a sound (i.e., changes to the frequency content), then changes less than 3 dBA may be more noticeable.43 Changes of 5 dBA may be readily perceptible, and changes of 10 dBA are perceived as a doubling in loudness.44 However, few people are highly annoyed by daytime noise levels below 55 dBA.45 Noise Attenuation Generally speaking, noise levels decrease, or “attenuate,” as distance from noise sources to receivers increases. For each doubling of distance, noise from stationary or small, localized sources, commonly referred to as “point sources,” may attenuate at the rate of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance. This attenuation is referred to as the inverse square law. For example, if a point source emits a noise level of 80 dBA at a reference distance of 50 feet its noise level would be approximately 74 dBA at a distance of 100 feet, 68 dBA at a distance of 200 feet, etc. Noise emitted by “line” sources such as highways attenuates at the rate of 3 dBA for each doubling of distance.46 Factors such as ground absorption and atmospheric effects may also affect the propagation of noise. In particular, ground attenuation by non-reflective surfaces such as soft dirt or grass may contribute to increased attenuation rates of up to an additional 8-10 dBA per doubling of distance.47 Noise is most audible when traveling by direct line of sight, an unobstructed visual path between a noise source and a receiver. Barriers that break the line of sight between noise sources and receivers, such as walls and buildings, can greatly reduce source noise levels by allowing noise to reach receivers by diffraction only. Barriers can reduce source noise levels by up to 20 dBA, though it is generally infeasible for temporary barriers to reduce source noise levels by more than 15 dBA.48 In cases where the noise path 43 Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 44 Ibid. 45 World Health Organization, Guidelines for Community Noise, 1999. 46 Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 47 Ibid. 48 Ibid. Page 137 from source to receiver is direct but grazes the top of a barrier, noise attenuation of up to 5 dBA may still occur.49 Fundamentals of Vibration Vibration is an oscillatory motion that can be described in terms of displacement, velocity, and acceleration.50 Unlike noise, vibration is not a common environmental issue, as it is unusual for vibration from vehicle sources to be perceptible. Common sources of vibration may include trains, construction activities, and certain industrial operations. Vibration Definitions This analysis discusses vibration in terms of Peak Particle Velocity (PPV). Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) PPV is commonly used to describe and quantify vibration impacts to buildings and other structures. PPV levels represent the maximum instantaneous peak of a vibration signal and are generally measured in inches per second (in/sec).51 Effects of Vibration High levels of vibration may cause damage to buildings or even physical personal injury. However, vibration levels rarely affect human health outside the personal operation of certain construction equipment or industrial tools. Instead, most people consider environmental vibration to be an annoyance that may affect concentration or disturb sleep. Background vibration in residential areas is usually not perceptible, and perceptible indoor vibrations are generally caused by sources within buildings themselves, such as slamming doors or heavy footsteps. Vibration from traffic on smooth roadways is rarely perceptible, even from larger vehicles such as buses or trucks.52 The threshold of human perception of vibration is approximately 0.01-0.02 in/sec PPV.53 49 Ibid. 50 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, September 2018. 51 Ibid. 52 Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, September 2013. 53 Ibid. Page 138 Regulatory Framework City of Orange General Plan The City of Orange General Plan contains a Noise Element providing guidance for the control of noise to protect residents, workers, and visitors. Its stated goal “is to identify problems and noise sources threatening community safety and comfort and to establish policies and programs that will limit the community’s exposure to excessive noise levels.” To this end, the “policies, plans, and programs outlined within the Noise Element are designed to minimize the effects of human-caused noise in the community, and to improve residents’ quality of life by regulating and reducing noise…” Additionally, “The Element provides direction regarding best practices and strategies to protect City residents and businesses from severe noise levels.”54 The City’s General Plan Appendix contains additional implementation measures based on the Noise Element’s goals and policies. Though the following goals, policies, and implementation programs would not directly regulate the Project’s operational noise impacts, as Municipal Code standards would, adherence to these goals, policies, and implementation programs would ensure the Project’s consistency with the City’s General Plan. Some goals, policies, and implementation programs have been omitted for relevance. The following goals and policies are taken from the City’s General Plan Noise Element: Goal 1.0: Promote a pattern of land uses compatible with current and future noise levels. Policy 1.1: Consider potential excessive noise levels when making land use planning decisions. Policy 1.2: Encourage new development projects to provide sufficient spatial buffers to separate excessive noise generating land uses and noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 1.3: Incorporate design features into residential and mixed-use projects that can be used to shield residents from excessive noise. Policy 1.4: Ensure that acceptable noise levels are maintained near noise-sensitive areas. Policy 1.5: Reduce impacts of high-noise activity centers located near residential areas. Policy 1.6: Require an acoustical study for proposed developments in areas where the existing and projected noise level exceeds or would exceed the maximum allowable levels 54 Noise Element of the City of Orange General Plan, updated December 2015. Page 139 identified on Table N-3. The acoustical study shall be performed in accordance with the requirements set forth within this Noise Element. Goal 2.0: Minimize vehicular traffic noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 2.1: Encourage noise-compatible land uses along existing and future roadways, highways, and freeways. Policy 2.2: Encourage coordinated site planning and traffic control measures that minimize traffic noise in noise-sensitive land use areas. Policy 2.3: Encourage the use of alternative transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, mass transit, and alternative fuel vehicles to minimize traffic noise. Policy 2.5: Work toward understanding and reducing traffic noise in residential neighborhoods with a focus on analyzing the effects of traffic noise exposure throughout the City. Goal 7.0: Minimize construction, maintenance vehicle, and nuisance noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses. Policy 7.2: Require developers and contractors to employ noise minimizing techniques during construction and maintenance operations. Policy 7.3: Limit the hours of construction and maintenance operations located adjacent to noise-sensitive land uses. Table 24, based on Table N-3 of the Noise Element, outlines the City’s noise standards for various land uses. The Noise Element also contains the following CEQA-specific guidance for the analysis of project noise impacts: For City analysis of noise impacts and determining appropriate mitigation under [CEQA], in addition to the maximum allowable noise level standards outlined on Tables N-3 and N-4, an increase in ambient noise levels is assumed to be a significant noise impact if a project causes ambient noise levels to exceed the following: • Where the existing ambient noise level is less than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 5 dBA CNEL or greater. • Where the existing ambient noise level is greater than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 3 dBA CNEL or greater. Page 140 Table N-3 of the Noise Element has been reproduced on Table 24. Table N-4 of the Noise Element is reproduced on Table 25. The following implementation programs are taken from the City’s General Plan appendix titled “Implementation”: Program III-18: Noise Reduction in New Construction Require construction contractors to implement the following measures during construction activities through contract provisions and/or conditions of approval as appropriate: • Construction equipment shall be properly maintained per manufacturers’ specifications and fitted with the best available noise suppression devices (i.e., mufflers, silencers, wraps, etc). • Shroud or shield all impact tools, and muffle or shield all intake and exhaust ports on power equipment. • Construction operations and related activities associated with the proposed project shall comply with the operational hours outlined in the City of Orange Municipal Code Noise Ordinance, or mitigate noise at sensitive land uses to below Orange Municipal Code standards. • Construction equipment should not be idled for extended periods of time in the vicinity of noise sensitive receptors. • Located fixed and/or stationary equipment as far as possible from noise sensitive receptors (e.g., generators, compressors, rock crushers, cement mixers). Shroud or shield all impact tools, and muffle or shield all intake and exhaust ports on powered construction equipment. • Where feasible, temporary barriers shall be placed as close to the noise source or as close to the receptor as possible and break the line of sight between the source and receptor where modeled levels exceed applicable standards. Acoustical barriers shall be constructed [of] material having a minimum surface weight of 2 pounds per square foot or greater, and a demonstrated Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25 or greater as defined by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method E90. Placement, orientation, size, and density of acoustical barriers shall be specified by a qualified acoustical consultant. Page 141 Table 24 City of Orange Noise Element Table N-3: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure – Transportation Sources Land Use CNEL (dBA) Designations Uses InteriorA,C ExteriorB Estate Low Density Residential Single-family, duplex, and multiple- family 45 65 Low Density Residential Mobile home park N/A 65 Low Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Neighborhood Single-family 45 65 Mixed-use Mobile home park N/A 65 Neighborhood Office Professional Multiple-family, mixed-use 45 65D,E Old Towne Mixed-use Transient lodging – motels, hotels 45 65 General Commercial Sports arenas, outdoor spectator sports N/A N/A Yorba Commercial Overlay Auditoriums, concert halls, amphitheaters 45 N/A Urban Mixed-use Office buildings, business, commercial and professional 50 N/A Light Industrial Manufacturing, utilities, agriculture N/A N/A Industrial Public Facilities and Institutions Schools, nursing homes, day care facilities, hospitals, convalescent facilities, dormitories 45 65 Government Facilities – offices, fire stations, community buildings 45 N/A Places of Worship, Churches 45 N/A Libraries 45 N/A Utilities N/A N/A Cemeteries N/A N/A Recreation Commercial Playgrounds, neighborhood parks N/A 70 Open Space Golf courses, riding stables, water recreation, cemeteries N/A N/A Open Space – Park Open Space - Ridgeline Resource Area A Interior habitable environment excludes bathrooms, closets and corridors. B Exterior noise level standard to be applied at outdoor activity areas: such as private yards, private patio or balcony of a multi-family residences. Where the location of an outdoor activity area is unknown or not applicable, the noise standard shall be applied inside the property line of the receiving land use. C Interior noise standards shall be satisfied with windows in the closed position. Mechanical ventilation shall be provided per Uniform Building Code (UBC) requirements. D Within the Urban Mixed-Use, Neighborhood Mixed-Use, Old Towne Mixed-Use, and Medium Density Residential land use designations, exterior space standards apply only to common outdoor recreational areas. E Within Urban Mixed-Use and Medium Density Residential land use designations, exterior noise levels on private patios or balconies located within 250 feet of freeways (I-5, SR-57, SR-55, SR-22, or SR-241) and Smart Streets and Principal Arterials identified in the Circulation & Mobility Element that exceed 70 dB should provide additional common open space. N/A = Not Applicable to specified land use category or designation. Source: City of Orange General Plan Noise Element, Table N-3. Page 142 Table 25 City of Orange Noise Element Table N-4: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure – Stationary Sources Noise Level Descriptor Daytime (7 A.M. to 10 P.M.) Nighttime (10 P.M. to 7 A.M.) Hourly Equivalent Level (Leq), dBA 55 45 Maximum Level (Lmax), dBA 70 65 Notes: (1) These standards apply to new or existing noise sensitive land uses affected by new or existing non- transportation noise sources, as determined at the outdoor activity area of the receiving land use. However, these noise level standards do not apply to residential units established in conjunction with industrial or commercial uses (e.g., caretaker dwellings). (2) Each of the noise levels specified above should be lowered by five dB for simple tone noises, noises consisting primarily of speech or music, or for recurring impulsive noises. Such noises are generally considered by residents to be particularly annoying and are a primary source of noise complaints. These noise level standards do not apply to residential units established in conjunction with industrial or commercial uses (e.g. caretaker dwellings). (3) No standards have been included for interior noise levels. Standard construction practices that comply with the exterior noise levels identified in this table generally result in acceptable interior noise levels. (4) The City may impose noise level standards which are more or less restrictive than those specified above based upon determination of existing low or high ambient noise levels. If the existing ambient noise level exceeds the standards listed on Table N-4 [this table], then the noise level standards shall be increased at 3 dB increments to encompass the ambient environment. Noise level standards incorporating adjustments for existing ambient noise levels shall not exceed a maximum of 70 dB Leq. Source: City of Orange General Plan Noise Element, Table N-4. Program III-19: Groundborne Noise and Vibration Implement the following measures to reduce the potential for human annoyance and architectural/structural damage resulting from elevated groundborne noise and vibration levels. • Construction-Induced Vibration. The City shall implement or require implementation of the following measures through contract provisions and/or conditions of approval as appropriate: o Pile driving required within a 50-foot radius of historic structures shall utilize alternative installation methods where possible (e.g., pile cushioning, jetting, pre- drilling, cast-in-place systems, resonance-free vibratory pile drivers). Specifically, geo pier style cast-in-place systems or equivalent [systems] shall be used where feasible as an alternative to pile driving to reduce the number and amplitude of impacts required for seating the pile. o The pre-existing condition of all buildings within a 50-foot radius of historic buildings within the immediate vicinity of proposed construction activities shall be recorded in the form of a preconstruction survey. The preconstruction survey shall determine conditions that exist before construction begins for use in evaluating damage caused by construction activities. Fixtures and finishes within a 50-foot radius of construction activities susceptible to damage shall be documented Page 143 (photographically and in writing) prior to construction. All damage will be repaired back to its pre-existing conditions. o Vibration monitoring shall be conducted prior to and during pile driving operations occurring within 100 feet of the historic structures. Every attempt shall be made to limit construction-generated vibration levels in accordance with Caltrans recommendations during pile driving and impact activities in the vicinity of the historic structures. o Provide protective covering or temporary shoring of on-site or adjacent historic features as necessary, in consultation with the Community Development Director or designee. Orange Municipal Code Chapter 8.24 of the Orange Municipal Code (OMC) contains noise control regulations that would have a limited application to the Project’s construction noise impacts, as the OMC exempts construction activities from the chapter’s provisions during the daytime hours when the Project’s construction activities would occur. Noises associated with the maintenance of the property (e.g. landscaping, cleaning, minor repair work, etc.) would similarly be exempt during daytime hours. Noises from transportation sources traveling on roadways would be subject to the City’s General Plan Noise Element. 8.24.050 – Exemptions from Chapter Provisions. The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this chapter: E. Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property, provided said activities take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on any day except for Sunday or a Federal holiday, or between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Sunday or a Federal holiday. Noise generated outside of the hours specified are subject to the noise standards identified on Table 8.24.040. I. Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property, provided such activities take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on any day except Sunday or a Federal holiday, or between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Sunday or a Federal holiday. Operation of leaf blowers are regulated under OMC Chapter 8.26. L. Mobile noise sources including but not limited to operational noise from trains, or automobiles or trucks traveling on roadways. Transportation noise as related to noise/land use compatibility is subject to the City’s General Plan Noise Element. As referenced by Section 8.24.050(e) above, construction activities occurring outside of the stated hours would be regulated by the standards outlined on Table 8.24.040. Though the Project’s construction activities would not take place outside of exempted hours, Section 8.24.040 and Table 8.24.040 are reproduced below for reference. Page 144 8.24.040 – Exterior Standards. A. The following noise standards for fixed noise sources, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall apply to all residential property: Table 8.24.040 Noise Level Time Period Hourly Average (Leq) 55 dBA 7:00 A.M. – 10:00 P.M. 50 dBA 10:00 P.M. – 7:00 A.M. Maximum Level 70 dBA 7:00 A.M. – 10:00 P.M. 65 dBA 10:00 P.M. – 7:00 A.M. B. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the City to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on any other residential property to exceed the noise standards identified on Table 8.24.040. For multi-family residential or mixed use developments located within the City’s Urban Mixed Use, Neighborhood Mixed Use, Old Towne Mixed Use or Medium Density Residential General Plan land use districts, exterior noise standards shall apply to common recreation areas only and shall not apply to private exterior space (such as private yard, patio, or balcony). C. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standards identified on Table 8.24.040 of this section, the “adjusted ambient noise level” shall be applied as the noise standard. In cases where the noise standard is adjusted due to a high ambient noise level, the noise standard shall not exceed the “adjusted ambient noise level,” or 70 dBA, whichever is less. In cases where the ambient noise level is already greater than 70 dBA, the ambient noise level shall be applied as the noise standard. D. Each of the noise limits specified on Table 8.24.040 shall be reduced by 5 dBA for impact or simple tone noises, recurring impulsive noises, or for noises consisting of speech or music. Though Section 8.24.050 would exempt the Project’s construction noise impacts from the OMC’s special provisions for schools, hospitals, and churches, these provisions are reproduced below for reference. 8.24.060 – Special Provisions for Schools, Hospitals, and Churches. It is unlawful for any person to create any noise which causes the noise level at any school, hospital or church, while the same is in use, to exceed the noise limits as specified in Section 8.24.040, or which noise level unreasonably interferes with the use of such institutions. Page 145 Section 8.24.100 of the OMC contains the following additional provision: 8.24.100 – Alternative Noise Prohibition. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter and in addition thereto, it is unlawful for any person to willfully make, continue, maintain, permit or cause to be made, continued, maintained, or permitted, any loud, unnecessary and unusual noise which disturbs the peace or quiet of any residential property or which causes discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity residing in the area. It shall be a prima facie violation of this section if any power tool, radio, receiving set, television, music amplifier, tape player, record player, compact disc player, musical instrument or similar device is played, used or permitted to be played or used between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. when audible from a distance of one hundred (100) feet from the property line of the noise source or from a distance of one hundred fifty (150) feet from any non-stationary noise source… Federal Transit Administration (FTA) For the evaluation of construction-related vibration impacts, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines and recommendations are used given the absence of applicable federal, County, or City standards specific to temporary construction activities. Though not regulatory in nature, the FTA has established vibration impact criteria for buildings and other structures, as building and structural damages are generally the foremost concern when evaluating the impacts of construction-related vibrations. Table 26 shows the FTA’s vibration guidelines for building and structural damage. Table 26 FTA Construction Vibration Damage Criteria Building Category PPV (in/sec) I. Reinforced concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 0.5 II. Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.3 III. Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.2 IV. Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, September 2018. Existing Conditions Project Site The Project Site currently contains a 5,959-square-foot former restaurant building and its related surface parking. As the restaurant is no longer operational (as of December 31, 2018), the site contains no active Page 146 uses and likely generates nominal, if any, environmental noise from on-site sources. However, this use would have generated various auto-related noises from its surface parking lot and related vehicle travel. Noise-Sensitive Receptors There are a number of noise-sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the Project. The City of Orange General Plan Noise Element defines “noise-sensitive land uses” as the following: residences, hospitals, convalescent and day care facilities, schools, and libraries. Local receptors include but are not limited to the following: • Holy Family Cathedral Residences: This receptor consists of residential land uses for the church’s on-site religious faculty (e.g. convents, rectory, etc.). The residential building that is nearest to the Project Site, “Cathedral House,” is approximately 15 feet north of the Project at 566 S. Glassell Street. • Holy Family Cathedral: This church receptor is located at 566 S. Glassell Street, approximately 100 feet north of the Project. Site • Holy Family Cathedral School: This school receptor is located at 530 S. Glassell Street and consists of sensitive classroom buildings as well as various outdoor recreational/athletic facilities. The classroom building that is closest to the Project Site, approximately 200 feet to the north, would have little to no line of sight to the Project’s on-site construction activities due to the intervening Holy Family Cathedral and residential buildings. Classroom buildings with line of sight to the Project Site are located approximately 285 feet to the northwest and 300 feet to the east. With regard to the receptor’s outdoor recreational/athletic facilities, a grass field is located directly west of the Project. Site Other facilities such as asphalt play areas and outdoor play equipment are located at least 150 feet to the west. • Glassell Street Residences: This receptor consists of residential land uses located along Glassell Street, approximately 95 feet east of the Project Site across Glassell Street. • Fashion Park Street Residences: This receptor consists of residential land uses located along Fashion Park Street, approximately 350 feet west of the Project Site. • Park Plaza Assisted Living Facility: This receptor includes the existing Park Plaza assisted living facilities that are located directly south of the Project Site. A map identifying the location of these receptors is included as Figure 15. Other noise-sensitive receptors are located at a greater distance from the Project and would experience lesser impacts than those listed above. Existing Ambient Noise Conditions On March 14, 2019, noise measurements were obtained at three locations near the Project Site to determine the ambient noise conditions surrounding the Project. At all locations, the primary driver of ambient noise Page 147 levels was vehicular traffic. Ambient noise levels in the residential neighborhood along Fashion Park Street were lower, owing to reduced pass-through traffic through this neighborhood. Ambient noise levels along Glassell Street were elevated, consistent with this street’s higher traffic volumes. According to the City of Orange General Plan Noise Element, Glassell Street in the Project area experiences daily noise levels in excess of 65 dBA CNEL. For the purpose of establishing daytime noise conditions in the Project’s vicinity, ambient noise levels were specifically measured between 10:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M., an off-peak traffic period that correlates with reduced environmental noise conditions. This is a conservative approach— construction noise impacts are more pronounced when compared against lower baseline noise levels. Measured noise levels are shown on Table 27. Table 27 Existing Noise Levels Noise Measurement Location Sound Level (dBA Leq) 1. Fashion Park Street – Rosewood Avenue 58.9 2. Glassell Street – Near Holy Family Cathedral 73.1 3. Glassell Street – S of East River Avenue 66.8 Source: NTEC, 2019. Existing Groundborne Vibration Levels No sources of groundborne vibration were perceptible at any noise measurement location during the course of the field noise study. It is likely that perceptible groundborne vibrations could occasionally be generated by sources such as garbage trucks and other large vehicles (e.g., semi-trucks, buses, cement trucks, etc.). However, groundborne vibration levels surrounding the Project Site are by and large imperceptible, suggesting that groundborne vibration levels are generally below the 0.01-0.02 in/sec PPV threshold of perception for humans. Source: Noah Tanski Environmental Consulting, 2019. Imagery via Google Figure 15Noise Receptor & Monitoring Location Map Page 149 Project Impacts Methodology The following section discusses the methods used to analyze the Project’s noise impacts: On-Site Construction Activities OMC Section 8.24.050 would exempt construction noises from the City’s noise ordinance provided that the noise-generating activities occur within the stated hours of exemption. As the Project’s construction activities would conform to these exempted hours, the Project would not result in a significant construction noise impact. Nevertheless, this analysis provides construction noise projections for nearby noise-sensitive receptors for informational purposes. Reference equipment noise levels were obtained from the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Construction Noise Model, version 1.1 (FHWA RCNM 1.1). The FHWA’s TNM 2.5 noise model was utilized to model the noise impact of a grader vehicle, whose work is mobile by nature. To represent a grader, a user defined vehicle was created which was assumed to generate a continuous noise level of 85 dBA, equal to the FHWA’s maximum noise level for this equipment. As a grader would not continuously emit its maximum instantaneous noise level while operating, the analysis portrays a conservative scenario. Off-Site Construction Activities As discussed above, the Project would limit its construction hours to those exempted by OMC Section 8.24.050 and therefore would not result in a significant construction noise impact. Nevertheless, off-site noise increases from haul trucks were estimated using the FHWA’s TNM 2.5 noise model and then compared with existing ambient noise conditions along nearby roadways to determine significance. On-Site Operational Noise Sources The Project’s potential to result in significant noise impacts from on-site operational noise sources was assessed by identifying likely on-site noise sources and considering the impacts they could produce given the nature of the source (i.e., loudness and/or whether noise would be generated during daytime or more- sensitive nighttime hours), distances to nearby noise-sensitive receptors, surrounding ambient noise levels, the presence of similar noise sources in the vicinity, and maximum allowable noise increases permitted by the City of Orange General Plan Noise Element. Off-Site Operational Noise Sources The Project would result in a net decrease of daily vehicle trips and therefore would not result in any noise increases due to its trip generation. Construction Vibration Sources The Project’s potential to generate damaging levels of groundborne vibration was analyzed by identifying construction vibration sources and estimating the maximum vibration levels that they could produce at Page 150 nearby buildings, all based on the principles and guidelines recommended by the FTA in its 2018 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment manual. Vibration levels were then compared with the manual’s suggested damage criteria for various building categories (refer to Table 26). Operational Vibration Sources Significant sources of operational vibration are generally limited to heavy equipment or industrial operations. The Project proposes to construct an assisted living memory care facility, and no such operations would take place. Thresholds of Significance The following thresholds are adopted to aid in the determination of the Project’s noise and vibration impacts: Construction Noise Thresholds Section 8.24.050(e) of the OMC exempts construction noise sources from the exterior noise standards of the City’s noise ordinance so long as construction activities are limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday, or between 9:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on Sunday or a Federal holiday. Construction occurring outside of these time periods would be subject to the City’s exterior noise standards, which are discussed above. Thus, to result in a significant impact from construction noise sources, the Project would have to generate construction noises outside the exempted hours set forth by OMC Section 8.24.050(e) that are in exceedance of the exterior noise standards laid out by OMC Section 8.24.040. Alternatively, a significant impact from construction noise sources would result should the Project result in power tool or construction vehicle operations between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. that are audible at a distance of 100 feet from the Project’s property line, pursuant to OMC Section 8.24.100. The City of Orange General Plan Noise Element contains no quantitative construction noise thresholds. Operational Noise Thresholds The Project’s non-mobile operational noise sources (i.e. chiefly its point sources) would be held against the exterior noise standards set forth by OMC Section 8.24.040. Thus, the Project’s non-mobile operational noise sources would result in a significant impact should they generate exterior noise levels in excess of the standards set forth by OMC Section 8.24.040. Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, and grading would be exempt pursuant to OMC Section 8.24.050. OMC Section 8.24.050(l) explicitly confers the regulation of mobile operational noise sources, namely Project-related traffic, to the City’s General Plan Noise Element, which contains CEQA-specific guidance for operational noise impacts. As discussed above, “…an increase in ambient noise levels is assumed to be a significant noise impact if a project causes ambient noise levels to exceed the following: Page 151 • Where the existing ambient noise level is less than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 5 dBA CNEL or greater. • Where the existing ambient noise level is greater than 65 dBA, a project related permanent increase in ambient noise levels of 3 dBA CNEL or greater.” Groundborne Vibration Threshold As discussed earlier, there are no federal, state, county, or City standards that would regulate the Project’s vibration impacts from temporary construction activities, nor are there quantitative thresholds. As a result, the criteria identified by the FTA in its 2018 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment manual (refer to Table 26) are used where applicable and relevant to assist in analyzing the Project’s groundborne vibration impacts as they pertain to Checklist Question 13(b) (Noise – Groundborne Vibration). (a) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? On-Site Construction Activities The proposed construction would generate noise during the estimated 17 months of demolition, site preparation, excavation/grading, building construction, and architectural coatings activities. However, the Project would adhere to the exempted construction hours set forth by Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Section 8.24.050. As a result, the Project’s construction noises would not exceed or otherwise violate the OMC’s exterior noise standards, and the Project’s noise impact from its construction sources would be less than significant. On-site construction activities would include the use of heavy equipment such as excavators, graders, loaders, bulldozers, and/or backhoes. Vehicles such as forklifts, skid steer loaders, crane trucks, drill rig trucks, concrete pumping trucks, and concrete mixing trucks would also be required. Smaller equipment such as generators and various powered hand tools would also be used throughout all construction phases. However, noise from demolition and grading activities are typically the foremost concern when evaluating a project’s construction noise impacts, as these activities often require the use of heavy-duty, diesel- powered earthmoving equipment. The Project’s grading phase would require an excavator and a grader. Of these vehicles, grader activities would likely have the greatest noise-generating potential given the Project’s lack of subgrade levels that would otherwise require extensive excavation activities. The Project would follow standard, industry-wide “best practices” for construction in urban or otherwise noise-sensitive areas. Best practices utilized by the Project would include the following: • Erecting temporary noise barriers around the Project’s perimeter prior to the commencement of major noise-generating construction activities. Page 152 • Erecting a temporary noise barrier “penalty box” for truck-mounted cranes, concrete pumping trucks, and concrete mixing trucks that may be permitted to temporarily operate from adjacent parking spaces or public right-of-way, outside the confines of the Project’s perimeter noise barriers. • Warming-up or staging equipment away from noise-sensitive receptors. • Placing generators, compressors, and other noisy equipment within acoustic enclosures or behind baffles or screens, especially when such equipment has line of sight to nearby noise-sensitive receptors and is not located within the confines of the Project’s perimeter noise barriers. These best practices would be consistent with the “Noise Reduction in New Construction” measures proposed in the “Implementation” appendix of the City’s General Plan and discussed earlier in this section. Standard noise barrier materials, such as one-inch plywood, would have a minimum surface weight of 2 pounds per square foot or greater and an STC rating of 25 or greater. Table 28 shows the projected noise impacts that would result from the Project’s grading activities. As shown, the Project’s grading activities would result in marginal noise increases at nearby noise-sensitive uses. Though grading activities may be intermittently audible due to the mobile nature of graders, which operate by driving across land back and forth to level earth, overall, resultant noise increases would not result in noticeably louder ambient noise conditions. As discussed earlier, noise increases of 3 dBA are only barely perceptible. Table 28 Construction Noise Levels - Grading Receptor Construction Noise Level (dBA Leq) Existing Ambient Noise Level (dBA Leq) New Noise Level (dBA Leq) Increase Holy Family Cathedral Residences 63.9 73.1 73.6 0.5 Holy Family Cathedral 63.4 73.1 73.5 0.4 Holy Family Cathedral School 57.3 58.9 61.2 2.3 Holy Family Cathedral Outdoors 50.3 58.9 59.5 0.6 Glassell Street Residences 63.7 66.8 68.5 1.7 Fashion Park Street Residences 42.9 58.9 59.0 0.1 Park Plaza Assisted Living Facility: 1st Floor: 2nd Floor: 3rd Floor: 59.4 67.3 69.0 73.1 73.3 74.1 74.5 0.2 1.0 1.4 Source: NTEC, 2019. Off-Site Construction Activities As discussed earlier, the Project would adhere to the exempted construction hours set forth by Section 8.24.050. As a result, the Project’s construction noises would not exceed or otherwise violate the OMC’s Page 153 exterior noise standards, and the Project’s noise impact from its construction sources would be less than significant. Nevertheless, the following analysis discusses the noise levels that could occur as a result of the Project’s off-site construction activities. Trucks and other construction-related vehicles would access the Project Site over the course of all construction phases. As the Project does not propose any subgrade levels, the Project’s excavation/grading- related soil export would be minimal. Other phases would also require few daily truck trips. Nevertheless, a conservative maximum of 10 truck trips per hour was modeled using the FHWA’s TNM 2.5 model to determine the effect that such truck activity could have along Glassell Street, which would be used to access the Project Site. According to this modeling, 10 truck trips per hour would be capable of generating noise levels of 60.3 dBA Leq at land uses east of Glassell Street and 57.6 dBA Leq at land uses west of Glassell Street. As field noise measurements indicate that off-peak-hour daytime ambient noise levels are between 66 dBA Leq and 73 dBA Leq along Glassell Street, Project-related trucks would not be capable of increasing roadside ambient noise levels by a discernable degree. On-Site Operational Noise The Project’s potential on-site operational noise sources are identified and discussed below. As discussed, the Project’s on-site operational noise impacts would be less than significant. Mechanical Equipment The majority of the Project’s rooftop HVAC equipment would be shielded behind a parapet wall, and the rooftop HVAC equipment not shielded behind the parapet wall would instead be screened behind a metal louver. This shielding would ensure that the Project’s HVAC equipment does not have direct line of site to nearby receptors. Additionally, based on the distance from the proposed memory care facility to nearby receptors, ambient noise levels, and the relatively quiet operation of modern HVAC systems, the Project’s HVAC equipment would not increase off-site noise levels by a discernable degree. Additionally, the Project’s existing use contains rooftop-mounted HVAC units and other mechanical systems. The Project would replace these units with more modern, and thus, presumably quieter and more efficient systems. A backup generator would be located near the northwest corner of the Project Site. The closest sensitive receptor to this portion of the Project Site is the Holy Family Cathedral Residences, located approximately 64 feet from the closest unit. Use of this generator would be limited to during power outages, though occasional testing of the generator could periodically generate noise during daytime hours. Such infrequent usage would not significantly degrade surrounding ambient noise conditions. The backup generator would be enclosed by a 9-foot-tall masonry wall that would substantially attenuate its noise levels. Project mechanical equipment would not exceed the exterior noise standards outlined in Section 8.24.040 of the Municipal Code at off-site locations Page 154 Auto-Related Activities The previous restaurant use at the Project Site had a surface parking lot with 60 spaces. The Project would have 16 parking spaces, a net decrease of 44 parking spaces as compared to the site’s existing use. As such, the noise levels associated with parking activities would be lower under the proposed memory care use than under use of the Project Site as restaurant with surface parking . Furthermore, the Project would result in a net decrease of 320 vehicle trips per day.55 As a result, vehicle-related noises (e.g. engines starting, doors slamming, etc.) from the site’s surface parking would also decrease. The types of calls for emergency medical services at a memory care facility are typically associated with residents who experience a fall or residents that need to be transferred to another care facility or hospital due to an illness or injury. These types of emergency response calls do not require the need for siren use. Thus, the Project would not result in an increase in siren noise in the Project Site area. Overall, the Project’s on-site sources of operational noise would have no potential to increase surrounding noise levels by at least 3 dBA CNEL, the Noise Element’s minimum threshold for permanent operational noise impacts. A 3 dBA CNEL increase represents a doubling of noise over 24 hours – the Project would not be capable of causing such an increase. Off-Site Operational Noise As discussed above, the Project would result in a net decrease of 320 vehicle trips per day. During the A.M. peak hour, the Project would generate just two net new trips; during the P.M. peak hour, the Project would result in a decrease of 34 trips. The Project’s two net new A.M. peak hour trips would have no impact on surrounding roadway noise levels. The Project would have no potential to increase roadway noise levels by at least 3 dBA CNEL, the Noise Element’s minimum threshold for permanent operational noise impacts, and this impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Building Damage Vibration Impact As discussed earlier, construction of the Project would require equipment such as excavators, loaders, dozers, and graders. Large, track-mounted grading vehicles can produce vibration levels of 0.089 inches per second PPV at a reference distance of 25 feet. Other construction vehicles and equipment would have 55 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis – Park Plaza Memory Care Project, June 2019. Page 155 lesser impacts. The Project would not require impact or vibratory pile driving. Table 29 shows the Project’s estimated vibration impacts at the nearest off-site structures. As shown, the Project’s construction activities would not be capable of generating groundborne vibration levels in excess of FTA building damage criteria, and the Project’s impact would be less than significant. Table 29 Building Damage Vibration Levels at Off-Site Structures Off-Site Structures Distance to Project Site (feet) Condition Significance Criteria (in/sec PPV) Impact (in/sec PPV) Significant? Equipment: Excavators and large, track-mounted grading equipment. Holy Family Cathedral Residences 15 I. Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber 0.5 0.191 No Holy Family Cathedral 100 I. Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber 0.5 0.011 No Glassell Street Residences 95 I. Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber 0.5 0.012 No Park Plaza Assisted Living Facility 10 I. Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber 0.5 0.352 No Source: NTEC, 2019. Reference vibration levels obtained from the FTA’s 2006 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment manual. Operational Vibrations Impact During Project operations, there would be no significant stationary sources of groundborne vibration, such as heavy equipment of industrial operations. The Project’s related vehicle travel would not be considered a significant source of vibration, as vehicle travel rarely generates perceptible groundborne vibration. As a result, the Project’s potential to generate excessive ground-borne vibration levels due to its operations would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Page 156 The Project Site is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip or within an airport land use plan or within two miles of any public airport. Thus, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels associated with an airstrip or airport. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. Only one of the cumulative projects (No. 2), located at 655 S. Glassell Street, across from the Project Site, is in close enough proximity to the Project Site to potentially create cumulative noise in concert with the Project. If both Cumulative Project No. 2 and the Project undergo construction at the same time, cumulative construction noise impacts could occur. However, as with the Project, Cumulative Project No. 2 would be required to implement best practices to minimize construction noise. Additionally, construction noise would be intermittent and temporary. Therefore, cumulative construction noise impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Project No. 2 includes development of seven single-family residential homes. Noise levels associated with this type of use does not typically result in noticeable permanent increases in ambient noise levels in urbanized areas, such is the context for the cumulative project. As discussed above, the Project would not result in a noticeable change in ambient noise levels onsite or offsite. Therefore, cumulative operational noise impacts would be less than significant. Page 157 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? R (b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Construction Construction job opportunities created as a result of the Project are not expected to result in any substantial population growth in the area. The work requirements of most construction projects are highly specialized so that construction workers remain at a job site only for the timeframe in which their specific skills are needed to complete a phase of the construction process. Additionally, the construction workers would likely be supplied from the region’s labor pool. Construction workers would not be likely to relocate their household as a consequence of working on the Project, and as such, significant housing or population impacts would not result from construction of the Project. Therefore, construction-related population growth impacts would be less than significant. Operation The existing land use designation for the Project Site is General Commercial. The Project does not include any change to this designation. As shown on Table 30, the City forecasts a gradual population growth with an estimated population of 153,000 in 2040. Table 30 City of Orange Population Growth Forecasts, 2010-2035 2012 2040 Change 2012-2040 138,500 153,000 +14,500 (9.5%) Source: SCAG, 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, Jurisdictional Forcast 2040, Table 11. Page 158 The Project includes development of a memory care facility, which would include 36 beds to accommodate 36 residents. It is possible that these 36 residents could already live in the City and would not result in an increase in the number of residents in the City. However, it is also possible that the all 36 residents could relocate to the Project Site from areas outside of the City, resulting in a residential population increase of 36 people. However, this potential increase of 36 residents would fall within the projected increase of 14,500 people from 2012 to 2040. Additionally, the Project does not include the development of any new roads or utility infrastructure that would accommodate growth off-site. Thus, the Project would not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure). Therefore, Project impacts related to population growth would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The Project Site is currently developed with a restaurant building and surface parking. No housing exists on the Project Site, and no people reside at the site. Thus, the Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. These cumulative projects would result in the development of 23 assisted living beds, 989 apartments/townhomes, 7 single-family residential homes, and a 907-square-foot coffee shop. These five cumulative projects are consistent with the General Plan and would not result in unplanned growth..56 As discussed above, the Project includes development of a memory care facility, which is a use that is allowed under the existing land use designation for the Project Site and under the existing zoning pursuant to a Conditional Use Permit. The Project would not result in unplanned population growth. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to unplanned population growth would be less than significant. 56 Kelly Ribuffo, Associated Planner, City of Orange, October 28, 2019. Page 159 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? R ii) Police protection? R iii) Schools? R iv) Parks? R v) Other public facilities? R Impact Analysis (a) i) Fire Protection The City of Orange Fire Department (OFD) provides fire protection and emergency medical services to the Project Site. Fire station placement is driven by the time needed to respond to medical and fire emergencies throughout the city. There are eight fire stations in the City housing seven fire engines (also called "pumpers"), one fire truck (also called a "ladder truck"), one quintuple combination pumper (also referred to as a "quint") and three rescue ambulances. The nearest fire stations to the Project Site include the following: • Station No. 1, located at 176 S. Grand Street, approximately 0.6 miles northeast of the Project Site. Protection area includes City’s Historical District and Chapman University, and stretches of the 55 and 22 Freeways.57 • Station No. 5, located at 1345 W. Maple Avenue, approximately 1.5 miles northwest of the Project Site. Protection area includes Children's Hospital Orange County, St. Joseph Hospital, and a nearby high- 57 City of Orange Fire Department: https://www.cityoforange.org/225/Locate-a-Station. Page 160 rise district, and stretches of the 22 and 57 Freeways, a portion of the Santa Ana River, and industrial, commercial, and residential neighborhoods.58 • Station No. 6, located at 345 The City Drive South, approximately 2.9 miles northwest of the Project Site. Protection area includes UCI Medical Center, The Block at Orange, Theo Lacy Jail, Orange County Juvenile Justice Center, and a high-rise district, and stretches of the 22, 5 and 57 Freeways and a portion of the Santa Ana River.59 The City receives fire and emergency medical dispatch services from the Metro Cities Fire Authority Communications Center that serves six other cities in the County, including Anaheim, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, and Newport Beach.60 The City participates in the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) for mutual aid and communication with other agencies during regional emergencies.61 For new buildings, safety is addressed through the plan review process. Site inspections are made of new construction and tenant improvement projects to confirm that projects are built per plan, and that there are not any special conditions on site that were not included and approved during the plan review process. Plans drawn in accordance with the current California Fire and Building Code requirements, as adopted by the City, are required in order to receive approval for conditions requiring a permit.62 The Project includes demolition and removal of the existing restaurant building on the Project Site and development of the site with a 36-bed memory care facility and surface parking. The Project would add 36 residents and associated staff to the Project Site that could increase the demand for fire protection services. However, adequacy of fire personnel and facilities is monitored on a consistent basis by the Fire Chief, and management staff and service needs are budgeted on an annual basis. A Fire Protection Facilities Fee Program been established that applies to new developments and would offset the demand created. According to the City’s findings, the fees to finance fire protection facilities required by new development is necessary in order to avoid adversely impacting existing fire protection facilities. Fire protection impacts would be addressed by the incorporation of the Fire Department’s requirements to be included in the design and construction of the Project to ensure that fire prevention, suppression, and other life safety features are incorporated into site plan and building design, which would help to reduce any potential impacts to a less than significant level. The Project would also comply with current codes and 58 Ibid. 59 Ibid. 60 City of Orange Fire Department: https://www.cityoforange.org/228/Emergency-Operations. 61 Page PS-24, Orange General Plan: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan--- Public-Safety-Element-PDF. 62 Orange Fire Department: https://www.cityoforange.org/203/Plan-Review. Page 161 ordinances applicable at the time of building permits. As shown on Figure 4 (Fire Master Plan), the Project Applicant has already entered the Plan Review process with OFD and has incorporated fire protection standards into the design of the Project. Through compliance with existing OFD and other City requirements, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection services. Therefore, Project impacts related to fire protection services would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (a) ii) Police Protection The City of Orange Police Department (OPD) provides police protection services to the Project Site. The OPD responds to emergency situations and patrols neighborhoods and commercial areas within the City to promote a safe environment. The staff maintains official criminal records, investigates crime, and in an emergency, assesses situations and quickly dispatches appropriate emergency responses. The OPD also directs proactive crime prevention programs. 63 The OPD headquarters and main police station is located at 1107 N. Batavia Street, approximately 2.5 miles north of the Project Site. The City of Orange is divided into 97 police reporting districts. The Project is within police reporting district #12, with boundaries of La Veta Avenue to the north, Main Street to the west, Glassell Street to the east, and the City of Santa Ana border to the south. The average crime rate for the City in 2018 was approximately 20 crimes per 1,000 residents, including a violent crime rate of 1.5 crimes per 1,000 residents and a property crime rate of 198 crimes per 1,000 residents.64 The Police Department does not use a standard officer-to-population or standard response time objective ratio to measure the adequacy of policing levels in the City of Orange. Instead, the Police Department analyzes demographics, service calls, population, crime trends and other changing factors to determine the level of police services needed. Emergency response times on average, vary anywhere from four to seven minutes depending on other call priorities and location of police vehicles in relation to call location. The call response time accounts for the department’s policy requiring two officers be available before responding to an emergency call. Each new development has a potential impact on response times and increased demand on police services. Using design features and adding security measures helps reduce the number of times the OPD is required to 63 Page PS-23, Orange General Plan: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan--- Public-Safety-Element-PDF. 64 Neighborhood Scout, website: https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/orange/crime, accessed August 7, 2019. Page 162 respond. Such measures can include secured parking areas, elevators, inclusion of abundant windows and balconies providing additional “eyes on the street,” on-site building management, and lighting for safety and security. The Project includes demolition and removal of the existing restaurant building on the Project Site and development of the site with a 36-bed memory care facility and surface parking. The Project would add 36 residents and associated staff to the Project Site that could increase the demand for police protection services. However, a Police Facility Development Fee has been established that applies to new developments and would offset the demand created. According to the City’s findings, the fees to finance police facilities required by new development is necessary in order to avoid adversely impacting existing police protection facilities. The proposed facility would be staffed at all times. All entrance and exit points to the building would be monitored at all times and would be alarmed during sleeping hours. All vistors would be required to check in prior to visiting residents of the facility. Cameras and lighting would be used throughout the facility and parking lot to monitor all activity. As part of the plan check process, the OPD would review the Project plans to determine if any additional measures could be incorporated into the Project to further reduce the potential for crime to occur at the Project. Overall, the Project would have minimal need for OPD services. Thus, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection services. Therefore, Project impacts related to police protection would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (a) iii) Schools The Project includes development of a memory care facility. Residents of the facility would likely be older and would not likely have school-aged children. As such, the Project would not create a demand for school services. Additionally, the Project Applicant would be required to pay applicable developer fees to the Orange Unified School District (OUSD) to offset any indirect impacts to schools. Thus, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools. Therefore, Project impacts related to schools would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Page 163 (a) iv) Parks The Project includes development of a memory care facility, which would include activity areas, lounging areas, a beauty salon, a courtyard, and covered terrace for on-site recreation. Memory care residents would not leave the facility to visit parks and recreational facilities and as such, would not create a demand for off-site parks and recreational services. Thus, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks and recreational services. Thus, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (a) v) Other Public Facilities The Project includes development of a memory care facility. Memory care residents would not leave the facility to visit libraries and as such, would not create a demand for library services. Thus, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for library services. Thus, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. These cumulative projects would result in the development of 23 assisted living beds, 989 apartments/townhomes, 7 single-family residential homes, and a 907-square-foot coffee shop. The degree to which these cumulative projects would require public services would be considered by the City on a project-by-project basis. As with the Project Applicant, the applicants of the cumulative projects would be required to pay applicable public services fees to the City to help offset potential impacts to public services. As discussed above, the Project’s impacts related to public services would be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to public services would be less than significant. Page 164 16. RECREATION. Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? R (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The Project includes development of a memory care facility, which would include activity areas, lounging areas, a beauty salon, a courtyard, and covered terrace for on-site recreating. Memory care residents would not leave the facility to visit parks and as such, would not create a demand for off-site parks and recreational services. Thus, the Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. Thus, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The Project includes development of a memory care facility, which would include activity areas, lounging areas, a beauty salon, a courtyard, and covered terrace for on-site recreating. Memory care residents would not create a demand for off-site parks and recreational services. Thus, the Project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Thus, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Page 165 Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 later in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. The degree to which the cumulative projects would require recreational facilities or would include the development of recreational facilities would be considered by the City on a project-by-project basis. As discussed above, the Project would not result in any impacts related to recreation. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to recreation would be less than significant. Page 166 17. TRANSPORTATION. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? R (b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? 65 R (c) Substantially increase hazards to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? R (d) Result in inadequate emergency access? R Impact Analysis The section is based in part on the following (refer to Appendix I): • Traffic Impact Analysis, Park Plaza Memory Care Project, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, June 21, 2019. (a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Study Area The four key study intersections selected for evaluation were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering (OTE) staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The City intersections listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for the traffic impact investigation. Key Study Intersections 1. Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue 65 In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c), the City of Orange, as the lead agency, will implement the provisions of Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines, when the provisions go into effect statewide beginning July 1, 2020. Page 167 2. Glassell Street at East River Avenue 3. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 4. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Figure 16 illustrates the general location of the Project and depicts the study locations and surrounding street system. The level of service (LOS) investigations at these key locations were used to evaluate the potential traffic-related impacts associated with the Project, area growth, and cumulative projects. Existing Street System The principal local network of streets serving the Project Site includes Glassell Street and La Veta Avenue. The discussion below provides a brief synopsis of these key area streets. The descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. Glassell Street is generally a four-lane, divided roadway oriented in the north-south direction and borders the Project Site to the east. Glassell Street transitions to a two-lane, undivided roadway north of La Veta Avenue. On-street parking is not permitted on the west side of Glassell Street south of East River Avenue and not permitted on the east side of Glassell Street north of East River Avenue. The posted speed limit on Glassell Street is 35 miles per hour (mph) south of La Veta Avenue and 30 mph north of La Veta Avenue. A traffic signal controls the study intersection of Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue. The study intersections of Glassell Street at East River Avenue, Park Plaza Driveway 1 and Park Plaza Driveway 2 are stop- controlled. La Veta Avenue is generally a four-lane, divided roadway west of Glassell Street and a two-lane undivided roadway east of Orange Street oriented in the east-west direction. On-street parking is generally not permitted along this roadway west of La Veta Avenue and on-street parking is permitted east of Orange Street within the vicinity of the Project Site. The posted speed limit on La Veta Avenue is 35 mph west of Glassell Street and 30 mph east of Glassell Street. Figure 17 presents an inventory of the existing roadway conditions for the arterials and intersections evaluated in this report. This figure identifies the number of travel lanes for key arterials, as well as intersection configurations and controls for the key area study intersections. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing AM peak-hour and PM peak-hour traffic volumes for the four key study intersections evaluated in this section were conducted by AimTD LLC in May 2019. Figures 18 and 19 illustrate the existing AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes at the four key study intersections. Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 16 Vicinity Map Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 17 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 18 Existing (2019) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 19 Existing (2019) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Page 172 Existing Intersection Conditions Existing AM and PM peak-hour operating conditions for the four key study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections and the methodology outlined in Chapter 17 of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM2000) for unsignalized intersections. ICU Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) In conformance with City requirements, existing AM and PM peak-hour operating conditions for the key signalized study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU technique is intended for signalized intersection analysis and estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal (green) time and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. Per City requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for through and all turn lanes. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.05 was added to each LOS calculation. The ICU value translates to a LOS estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning movements. The six qualitative categories of LOS have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range and are shown on Table 31. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) The HCM unsignalized methodology for stop-controlled intersections was utilized for the analysis of the unsignalized intersections. LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections differ from LOS criteria for signalized intersections as signalized intersections are designed for heavier traffic and thus, a greater delay. Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections Two-way stop-controlled intersections compose a major street, which is uncontrolled, and a minor street, which is controlled by stop signs. LOS for a two-way stop-controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay. The control delay by movement, by approach, and for the intersection as a whole is estimated by the computed capacity for each movement. LOS is determined for each minor- street movement (or shared movement) as well as major-street left turns. The worst side street approach delay is reported. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole or for major-street approaches, as it is assumed that major-street through vehicles experience zero delay. The HCM control delay value range for two-way stop-controlled intersections is shown on Table 32. Page 173 Table 31 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization Value (V/C) Level of Service Description A £ 0.60 EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one red light, and no approach phase is fully used. B 0.61 – 0.70 VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C 0.71 – 0.80 GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D 0.81 – 0.90 FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. E 0.91 – 1.00 POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. F > 1.00 FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Potentially very long delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. Source: Transportation Research Board Circular 212 – Interim Materials on Highway Capacity. Page 174 Table 32 LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service (LOS) Highway Capacity Manual Delay Value (sec/vph) Level of Service Description A £ 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 and £ 15.0 Short traffic delays C > 15.0 and £ 25.0 Average traffic delays D > 25.0 and £ 35.0 Long traffic delays E > 35.0 and £ 50.0 Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Chapter 17 (Unsignalized Intersections). Level of Service Criteria According to the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak commute hours on all intersections and LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained daily on all roadway segments. Existing LOS Table 33 summarizes the existing peak-hour service level calculations for the four key study intersections based on existing traffic volumes and current street geometry. All four key study intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Page 175 Table 33 Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service Key Intersection Time Period Jurisdiction Minimum Acceptable LOS Control Type ICU LOS 1. Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue AM PM Orange D 8Æ Traffic Signal 0.631 0.617 B B 2. Glassell Street at East River Avenue AM PM Orange D One-Way Stop -- -- B C 3. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 AM PM Orange D One-Way Stop -- -- A A 4. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 AM PM Orange D One-Way Stop -- -- A B Æ = phase Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, 2019. Impact Criteria and Thresholds Impacts to local and regional transportation systems located in the City are considered significant if the following occurs: Intersections: • An unacceptable peak-hour LOS at any of the key intersections is projected. According to the City’s Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak hours on all intersections; and • The project increases traffic demand at the study intersection by 1.0 percent of capacity (ICU increase ≥ 0.010), causing or worsening LOS E or LOS F (ICU > 0.900). • An unsignalized intersection impact is considered to be significant if the project causes an intersection operating at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or LOS F, and the traffic signal warrant analysis determines that a traffic signal is justified. Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 9th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Page 176 Table 34 summarizes the trip generation rates used in forecasting the vehicular trips generated by the Project and the existing land use (i.e. existing vacant restaurant building) and also presents the Project’s forecast peak hour and daily traffic volumes. For this analysis, the trip generation potential of the existing land use was estimated using ITE Land Use 931: Quality Restaurant trip rates and the trip generation potential of the Project was estimated using ITE Land Use 254: Assisted Living trip rates. As shown on Table 34, the Project would generate 320 fewer net daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 2 greater net trips (0 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour, and 34 fewer net trips (-24 inbound, -10 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a typical weekday compared to the existing use. It should be noted that the existing 5,595-square-foot restaurant is currently non-operational. Thus, the Project’s gross trip generation of 149 daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 6 trips (4 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour, and 10 trips (5 inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour was utilized in this traffic impact analysis to provide a conservative assessment. Table 34 Project Traffic Generation Forecast ITE Land Use Code/Project Description Daily 2-Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Generation Rates: • ITE 254: Assisted Living (TE/Occupied Beds) 4.14 68% 32% 0.18 50% 50% 0.29 • ITE 931: Quality Restaurant (TE/TSF) 83.84 90% 10% 0.73 67% 33% 7.80 Generation Forecasts: [A] Project • Park Plaza Expansion – Memory Care Facility (36 Beds) 149 4 2 6 5 5 10 [B] Existing Land Use • Restaurant (5,595 SF) 469 4 0 4 29 15 44 Total “Net Increase” Project Trip Generation: Project - Existing Land Use [A]-[B] -320 0 2 2 -24 -10 -34 Notes: TE/Occupied Beds = Trip End per Occupied Beds TE/TSF = Trip End per Thousand Square Feet Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 20 illustrates the general, directional traffic distribution pattern for the Project. Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the Project Site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 20 Project Traffic Distribution Pattern Not to Scale Page 178 • Directional flows on the freeways in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site (i.e. I-5 Freeway and SR-22 Freeway); • The Project Site's proximity to major traffic carriers (i.e. Glassell Street); • Expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of traffic signals; and • Ingress/egress availability at the Project Site. The anticipated AM and PM peak-hour Project traffic volumes associated with the Project are presented on Figures 21 and 22. The traffic volume assignments presented in the figures reflects the traffic distribution characteristics. Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The Existing plus Project traffic conditions have been generated based upon existing conditions and the estimated Project traffic. These forecast traffic conditions have been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, which require that the potential impacts of a Project be evaluated upon the circulation system as it currently exists. This traffic volume scenario and the related intersection capacity analyses will identify the roadway improvements necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impacts of the Project, if any. Figures 23 and 24 present projected AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes at the four key study intersections with the addition of the trips generated by the Project to existing traffic volumes, respectively. It should be noted that an assumption was made to account for a portion of existing outbound volume from the southernmost driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 2) that would utilize the full-access northernmost driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 1) to go northbound on Glassell Street. Review of column (2) of Table 35 indicates that traffic associated with the Project would not significantly impact any of the four key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified previously. Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 21 AM Peak Hour Project - Generated Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 22 PM Peak Hour Project - Generated Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 23 Existing (2019) Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 24 Existing (2019) Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Page 183 Table 35 Existing (Year 2019) Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis # Key Intersection Time Period (1) Existing (Year 2019) (2) Existing Plus Project (Year 2019) ICU Delay (s/v) LOS Deficient? ICU Delay (s/v) LOS ICU or Delay Change (2)-(1) Significant Impact? 1 Glassell Street at AM 0.631 -- B No 0.632 -- B 0.001 No La Veta Avenue PM 0.617 -- B No 0.618 -- B 0.001 No 2 Glassell Street at AM -- 13.7 B No -- 13.7 B 0.0 No East River Avenue PM -- 15.2 C No -- 15.3 C 0.1 No 3 Glassell Street at AM -- 0.0 [a] A No -- 19.2 C 19.2 No Park Plaza Driveway 1 PM -- 0.0 [a] A No -- 15.2 C 15.2 No 4 Glassell Street at AM -- 0.0 [b] A No -- 0.0 [b] A 0.0 No Park Plaza Driveway 2 PM -- 12.1 B No -- 12.1 B 0.0 No s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) [a] The existing site of the proposed Project is currently vacant and there is no existing volume coming out of Driveway 1. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. [b] There is no existing outbound volume coming out of Driveway 2 during the AM Peak Hour. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. Page 184 Future Traffic Conditions Ambient Traffic Growth Horizon year, background traffic growth estimates have been calculated using an ambient traffic growth factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future cumulative projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to the development of projects outside the study area. The future growth in traffic volumes has been calculated at 1.0 percent per year. Applied to the Year 2019 existing traffic volumes, this factor results in a 2.0 percent growth in existing volumes to the near-term horizon year 2021. Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics In order to make a realistic estimate of future on-street conditions prior to implementation of the Project, the status of other known development projects (cumulative projects) in the vicinity of the Project Site has been researched at the City and the City of Santa Ana. With this information, the potential impact of the Project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. Based on research identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis (refer to Appendix I), there are four cumulative projects in the City and one cumulative project in the City of Santa Ana within the vicinity of the Project Site that have either been built, but not yet fully occupied, or are being processed for approval. These five cumulative projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting. Table 36 provides a brief description for each of the five cumulative projects. The location of the cumulative projects is shown on Figure 25. These cumulative projects are expected to generate vehicular traffic, which may affect the operating conditions of the key study intersections. The cumulative projects are forecast to generate a total of 7,233 daily trips, with 549 trips during the AM peak hour and 649 trips during the PM peak hour. Page 185 Table 36 Cumulative Projects Description and Trip Generation Estimates Cumulative Project/Location Land Use Size 1. Ronald McDonald House Expansion 383 and 389 South Batavia Street, 802 West Culver Avenue (City of Orange) Assisted Living 23 Beds 2. Dang Residences 655 South Glassell Street (City of Orange) Single Family Detached Housing 7 DU 3. 999 Town and Country Apartments 999 Town and Country road (City of Orange) Apartments 262 DU [b] 4. Town and Country Apartments and Townhomes 702 West Town and Country Road (City of Orange) Apartments Townhomes 653 DU [c] 74 DU [c] 5. Starbucks 2701 North Grand Avenue (City of Santa Ana) Coffee Donut Shop with Drive- Through Window 0.907 TSF [a] Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017), unless otherwise noted. [b] Source: 999 Town & Country Apartments Project Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. [c] Source: Town and Country Apartments and Townhomes Project Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. Year 2021 Without Project The AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes associated with the five cumulative projects are presented on Figures 26 and 27, respectively. Figures 28 and 29 present the AM and PM peak-hour cumulative traffic volumes (existing traffic + ambient growth traffic + cumulative project traffic) at the four key study intersections for the Year 2021, respectively. Table 37 summarizes the peak-hour LOS results at the 4 key study intersections for Year 2021 traffic conditions. Year 2021 Plus Project Figures 30 and 31 illustrate the Year 2021 forecast AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes (respectively), with the inclusion of the trips generated by the Project. As shown on Table 37, the analysis of future (Year 2021) cumulative traffic conditions indicates that the addition of the Project would not significantly impact any of the four key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this analysis. All four key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2021 cumulative traffic. Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019.Figure 25Location of Cumulative Porjects Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 26 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Project Only Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 27 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Project Only Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 28 Year 2021 Cumulative Base AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 29 Year 2021 Cumulative Base PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Page 191 Table 37 Year 2021 Cumulative Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis # Key Intersectio Time Period (1) Existing (Year 2019) (2) Year 2021 Cumulative Baseline (3) Year 2021 plus Project ICU Delay (s/v) LOS Deficient? ICU Delay (s/v) LOS Deficient? ICU Delay (s/v) LOS ICU or Delay Change (3)-(2) Significant Impact? 1 Glassell Street at AM 0.631 -- B No 0.652 -- B No 0.632 -- B 0.001 No La Veta Avenue PM 0.617 -- B No 0.631 -- B No 0.631 -- B 0.000 No 2 Glassell Street at AM -- 13.7 B No -- 14.0 B No -- 14.0 B 0.0 No East River Avenue PM -- 15.2 C No -- 15.7 C No -- 15.7 C 0.0 No 3 Glassell Street at AM -- 0.0 [a] A No -- 0.0 [a] A No -- 19.9 C 19.9 No Park Plaza Driveway 1 PM -- 0.0 [a] A No -- 0.0 [a] A No -- 15.6 C 15.6 No 4 Glassell Street at AM -- 0.0 [b] A No -- 0.0 [b] A No -- 0.0 [b] A 0.0 No Park Plaza Driveway 2 PM -- 12.1 B No -- 12.2 B No -- 12.2 B 0.0 No s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) [a] The existing site of the proposed Project is currently vacant and there is no existing volume coming out of Driveway 1. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. [b] There is no existing outbound volume coming out of Driveway 2 during the AM Peak Hour. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 30 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Source: Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers, 2019. Figure 31 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale Page 194 Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c), the City of Orange, as the lead agency, will implement the provisions of Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines, when the provisions go into effect statewide beginning July 1, 2020. Significance Determination: NA Mitigation Measures: None (c) Would the project substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City and is served by existing roadway infrastructure. The Project includes development of a memory care facility as an extension of an existing senior care facility located adjacent to the Project Site to the south. The Project does not include the development of any new roadway infrastructure. The Project’s driveway and drive aisles would be designed and constructed to meet City standards. Thus, the Project would not substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). Therefore, no significant impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None (d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Glassell Street, located adjacent to the Project Site to the east, is the closest designated evacuation corridors within the City of Orange.66 The Project would not affect access to Glassell Street during construction, as all construction equipment, staging, and parking would occur on the Project Site, and would not affect emergency access to any off-site properties. The Project’s driveway and drive aisles would be designed and constructed to meet City standards, including Fire Code standards (refer to Figure 4). Thus, the Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no significant impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project. 66 Orange General Plan, Figure PS-4, Generalized Evacuation Corridors: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/General-Plan---Public-Safety-Element-PDF Page 195 Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As discussed above and as shown on Table 37, cumulative traffic impacts would be less than significant. Page 196 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, or cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k); or (b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Impact Analysis (a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Refer to response to Checklist Question 5(a) (Cultural Resources – Historical Resources) and Checklist Question 5(b) (Cultural Resources – Archaeological Resources). Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Mitigation Measures: Refer to the mitigation measures listed in response to Checklist Question 5(a) (Cultural Resources – Historical Resources) and Checklist Question 5(b) (Cultural Resources – Archaeological Resources). Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant (b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Approved by Governor Brown on September 25, 2014, Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) establishes a formal consultation process for California Native American Page 197 Tribes to identify potential significant impacts to tribal cultural resources (TCRs), as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074, as part of CEQA. Effective July 1, 2015, AB 52 applies to projects that file a Notice of Preparation of an ND or EIR on or after July 1, 2015. PRC Section 21084.2 now establishes that a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a TCR is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. To help determine whether a project may have such an effect, Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 requires a lead agency to consult with any California Native American tribe that requests consultation and is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project. That consultation must take place prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report for a project. As a result of AB 52, the following must take place: 1) prescribed notification and response timelines; 2) consultation on alternatives, resource identification, significance determinations, impact evaluation, and mitigation measures; and 3) documentation of all consultation efforts to support CEQA findings for the administrative record. Under AB 52, if a lead agency determines that a project may cause a substantial adverse change to a TCR, the lead agency must consider measures to mitigate that impact. PRC Section 21074 provides a definition of a TCR. In brief, in order to be considered a TCR, a resource must be either: 1) listed, or determined to be eligible for listing, on the national, State, or local register of historic resources, or 2) a resource that the lead agency chooses, in its discretion supported by substantial evidence, to treat as a TCR. In the latter instance, the lead agency must determine that the resource meets the criteria for listing in the State register of historic resources or City Designated Cultural Resource. In applying those criteria, a lead agency shall consider the value of the resource to the tribe. As specified in AB 52, lead agencies must provide notice to tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project if the tribe has submitted a written request to be notified. The tribe must respond to the lead agency within 30 days of receipt of the notification if it wishes to engage in consultation on the project, and the lead agency must begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving the request for consultation. Pursuant to AB 52, the Community Development Department notified Native American tribes as to the Project with a 30-day consultation period on [INSERT DATE]. The Gabrieliño Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation requested consultation with the City on November 22, 2019. The City concluded the consultation with the Gabrieliño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation on [INSERT DATE]. It is possible that unknown TCRs could exist at the Project Site that could be encountered, given the relative sensitivity of the Project Site region. As such, the Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measures TCR- 1 through TCR-6 to ensure appropriate treatment of potential unknown tribal cultural resources. Compliance with these mitigation measures would ensure that Project impacts related to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: TCR-1: Retain Tribal Monitor/Consultant. The Project Applicant shall retain and compensate a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Page 198 Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the Project Site area. The Tribal monitor/consultant shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground-disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant shall complete daily monitoring logs that provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when Project grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting TRCs. TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal and Archaeological Resources. Upon discovery of any tribal or archaeological cultural resources, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find shall cease until the find can be assessed. All tribal and archaeological cultural resources unearthed as a result of construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The Tribe monitor/consultant could request preservation in place or recovery for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project during evaluation and if necessary, additional protective mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 (f)). If a resource is determined to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, shall be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources. TCR-3: Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) (Unique Archaeological Resources). Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. All TCRs shall be returned to the Tribe. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. TCR-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objections. If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the Project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 150-foot buffer of the find) shall cease, and the County Coroner shall be contacted. If the human remains are determined to be Native American in origin by the County Coroner, the Tribal monitor/consultant shall Page 199 immediately notify the NAHC as mandated by state law to establish the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). TCR-5: Kizh-Gabrieleño Procedures for Burial and Funerary Remains. If the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation is designated the MLD, the Koos-nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. In the event that burial and funerary remains are encountered, all prepared soil and cremation soils shall be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Prior to the continuation of ground-disturbing activities, the Project Applicant shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the Project Site for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains shall be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe monitor/consultant shall make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the Project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials could be removed. The Tribe monitor/consultant shall work closely with a qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe monitor/consultant, documentation shall be taken that includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe monitor/consultant for data recovery purposes. Cremations shall either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location would be considered a cemetery, and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and the NAHC. No scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains shall be allowed. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony shall be removed to a secure container on site, if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project Site but at a location agreed upon between the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and the Project Applicant at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. TCR-6: Professional Standards. Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction activities shall be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years Page 200 of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in Southern California. The Tribal monitor/consultant shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 previously in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. For any of these cumulative projects that are subject to CEQA, the City would be required to comply with AB 52 requirements for each cumulative project. The degree to which tribal cultural resources could exist at the sites of the cumulative projects and could be affected by development is considered by the City on a project-by-project basis. As discussed above, with implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-6, no significant impacts related to TRCs would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to TCRs would be less than significant. Page 201 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? R (b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, or multiple dry years? R (c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? R (d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? R (e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? R Impact Analysis (a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Water Treatment The City relies on a combination of imported water and local groundwater to meet its water needs. The City works together with three primary agencies, Metropolitan Water District (MWD), Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC), and Orange County Water District (OCWD) to ensure a safe and reliable water supply that will continue to serve the community in periods of drought and shortage. The sources of imported water supplies include the Colorado River and the State Water Project (SWP) provided by MWD and delivered through MWDOC. The City’s main source of water supply is groundwater from the Lower Santa Ana River Groundwater Basin. The City’s water supply is supplemented by imported water and Page 202 surface water. It is projected that by 2040, the water supply mix will be approximately 70 percent groundwater, 26 percent imported water, and 4 percent surface water.67 Groundwater is typically treated at the location of the groundwater pump and removes certain contaminants that are specific to the groundwater source. The MWD treats its water at a variety of water treatment plants throughout Southern California, with a combined treatment capacity of 2.3 billion gallons of water per day. The Serrano Water District operates its own water treatment plant. As shown on Table 38, it is estimated that the Project would result in a net increase of approximate 1,556 gallons of water per day. Any portion of this amount of water that would come from groundwater would be treated at the pump and would not require new or expanded treatment facilities. Water imported by MWD would be treated by MWD treatment plants. With a combined treatment capacity of 2.3 billion gallons per day, MWD treatment plants would have sufficient existing capacity to treat the remainder (if not all) of the Project’s water demand. Thus, the Project would not require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, Project impacts related to water treatment would be less than significant. Table 38 Estimated Project Wastewater Generation/Water Consumption Land Use Size Wastewater Generation/ Water Consumption Rates1, 2 Total (gpd) Existing Restaurant 165 seats3 30 gpd/seat 4,950 Proposed Memory Care Facility Units Commons, Admin, Circulation, and Support 36 beds 15,224 sf 75 gpd/bed 0.25 gpd/sf 2,700 3,806 Project Subtotal 6,506 Less Existing -4.950 Net Total 1,556 gpd = gallons per day sf = square feet 1 The estimates of wastewater generation conservatively assume that wastewater generation equals water consumption. 2 Rate source: City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation, Sewer Generation Rates Table, March 20, 2002. 3 Assumes 30 square feet per seat in dining area. 67 City of Orange, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, June 2016. Page 203 Wastewater Treatment The City of Orange relies on the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) for the regional collection and treatment of domestic, commercial, and industrial sewage. Although OCSD operates a comprehensive regional system of collection mains and treatment plants, individual cities are responsible for installing and maintaining local collection facilities. 68 OCSD facilities operate under a waste discharge permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).69 The OCSD is required to comply with the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2006-0003-DWQ adopted May 2, 2006, entitled Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems.70 The OCSD has two operating facilities that treat wastewater from residential, commercial, and industrial sources. For 2018-2019, Plant #1 processed an average daily flow of 120 million gallons of wastewater per day (mgd), and Plant #2 processed an average daily flow of 65 mgd, for a total of 185 mgd of wastewater processed per day.71 As shown on Table 39, the two treatment plants have a surplus capacity of 91 mgd. Table 39 Wastewater Treatment Plants Facility Average Flow (mgd) Design Capacity (mgd) Remaining Capcity (mgd) Reclamation Plant No. 1 120 108 -12 Treatment Plant No. 2 65 168 +103 Total 185 276 +91 mgd – million gallons daily Source: Page 5.12-13, City of Orange General Plan Program EIR: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact- Report-EIR-PDF. Orange County Sanitation District, website: https://www.ocsd.com/services/regional-sewer-service, accessed August 8, 2019. As shown on Table 38, the Project would generate a net total of approximately 1,556 gallons of wastewater per day. This amount would account for approximately 0.001 percent of the remaining capacity at the OCSD facilities. As such, the two OCSD treatment plants would have adequate capacity to accommodate the wastewater generated by the Project. Additionally, the Project proposes memory care/senior living uses and 68 Page INF-2, Orange General Plan: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/568/General-Plan---- Infrastructure-Element-PDF. 69 Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Boards: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/. 70 Sewer System Management Plan, January 9, 2013: http://www.ocsd.com/Home/ShowDocument?id=14383. 71 Orange County Sanitation District, website: https://www.ocsd.com/services/regional-sewer-service, accessed August 8, 2019. Page 204 not any industrial or commercial land uses that could require special treatment. Thus, the Project would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, Project impacts related to wastewater treatment would be less than significant. Stormwater Drainage Refer to response to Checklist Question 10(c) iii) (Hydrology and Water Quality – Storm Drain Capacity) regarding the Project’s less-than-significant impacts related to storm drain capacity. Electric Power Refer to response to Checklist Question 6(a) (Energy – Electricity and Natural Gas) regarding the Project’s less-than-significant impacts related to electric power. Natural Gas Refer to response to Checklist Question 6(a) (Energy – Electricity and Natural Gas) regarding the Project’s less-than-significant impacts related to natural gas. Telecommunications The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City that is already served by existing internet, cable television, and phone service, including AT&T, Spectrum, Cox Communications, and Viasat. Any facilities that are on the Project Site only serve the Project Site and would be re-established to serve the Project. The Project would not result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. Thus, no impacts related to this issue would occur as a result of the Project Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, or multiple dry year? As shown on Table 38, the Project would result in a net increase in water demand of approximately 1,556 gallons per day. The proposed memory care facility is a land use that is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit under the existing zoning and land use designation for the Project Site and as such, the water demand for such a use has been accounted for in the City’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (2015 UWMP), which bases its water demand projections on water use by customer type (i.e., single-family residential, multi-family residential, commercial, institutional/government), among other factors. According to the 2015 UWMP, the City’s total projected water supplies available during normal, single dry, and multiple dry years during a 20-year projection (2020 through 2040) would meet the projected water demand associated with the Project, in addition to the City’s existing and planned future uses described in the 2015 Page 205 UWMP (refer to Tables 40, 41, and 42)The City can meet the Project’s demand through its existing water supply sources, including local groundwater, imported water, and local surface water. As the City has adequate capacity to produce the water demand required by the Project, no new or expanded water facility would be required. Impacts would therefore be less than significant. Thus, the Project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, or multiple dry year. Therefore, Project impacts related to water supply would be less than significant. Table 40 Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison (AF) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Supply totals 28,000 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 Demand totals 28,000 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 Difference 0 0 0 0 0 AF = acre feet Source: City of Orange, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, June 2016. Table 41 Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison (AF) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Supply totals 29,680 31,270 31,270 31,270 31,270 Demand totals 29,680 31,270 31,270 31,270 31,270 Difference 0 0 0 0 0 AF = acre feet Source: City of Orange, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, June 2016. Table 42 Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison (AF) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 First Year Supply totals Demand totals Difference 29,680 29,680 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 Second year Supply totals Demand totals Difference 29,680 29,680 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 Third year Supply totals Demand totals Difference 29,680 29,680 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 31,270 31,270 0 AF = acre feet Source: City of Orange, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, June 2016. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Page 206 (c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Refer to response to Checklist Question 19(a) (Utilities and Service Systems – Wastewater Treatment) regarding the Project’s less-than-significant impacts related to wastewater treatment. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? The landfills that serve the City include Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano, Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill in Brea, and the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine. The Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department (IWMD) owns and operates these landfills.72 Information regarding these landfills is detailed on Table 43. The landfills have a combined total daily disposal availability of 6,600 tons per day. Table 43 Landfill Capacity Name Max Daily Permitted Estimated Daily Disposal Available Daily Disposal Closure Date Prima Deshecha Landfill 4,000 tpd 1,400 tpd 2,600 tpd 12/31/2067 Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill 8,000 tpd 7,000 tpd 1,000 tpd 12/31/2021 Frank R. Bowerman Landfill 11,500 tpd 8,500 tpd 3,000 tpd 12/31/2053 Prima Deshecha: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/PublicNotices/Details/3656 Olinda: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/30-AB-0035/ Bowerman: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/30-AB-0360/ As shown on Table 44, the Project would generate a net increase of approximately 0.09 tons of solid waste per day. This amount would represent approximately 0.001 percent of the total daily available capacity of the landfills that serve the City. Thus, the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, Project impacts related to landfill capacity would be less than significant. 72 Page INF-12, Orange General Plan: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/584/General-Plan- Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR-PDF Page 207 Table 44 Estimated Project Solid Waste Generation Land Use Size Daily Solid Waste Generation Rates1 Total (lbs per day)2 Total (tpd)2 Existing Restaurant 5,959 sf 5 lbs/1,000 sf 30 0.02 Project Memory Care Facility Residential Non-Residential 36 beds 15,134 sf 4 lbs/bed 5 lbs/1,000 sf 144 76 0.07 0.04 Project Subtotal 220 0.11 Less Existing 30 0.02 Net Total 90 0.09 lbs = pounds tpd = tons per day sf = square feet 1 ton = 2,000 pounds 1 Rates: CalRecycle Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGcentral/GoalMeasure/DisposalRate/MostRecent/default.htm. 2 Numbers may not add up due to rounding. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None (e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Trash, recyclables, and green waste within the City are collected by CR&R Waste and Recycling Services (CR&R). The Project Applicant is in the process of coordinating with CR&R to assess the waste disposal and recycling requirements and needs for the Project. The Project would share trash and recycling services through CR&R with the existing associated senior facility to the south. The shared trash and recycling receptacles would include a four-yard trash compactor, a four-yard bin for recyclable materials, and four 64-gallong carts for food waste. All green waste would be taken off-site by the landscapers and recycled at the appropriate facility. The Project would comply with federal, state, and local regulations related to waste reduction. Therefore, Project impacts related to waste reduction would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Cumulative Impacts As shown on Table 36 previously in this MND, there are five cumulative projects within proximity to the Project Site. All of the sites of the cumulative projects are located in an urbanized area of the City, are Page 208 currently developed with uses that have a demand for utilities, and are currently served by existing utility infrastructure. The degree to which each cumulative project would result in a net change in the demand for utilities would be considered by the City on a project-by-project basis. Each cumulative project would be subject to existing regulatory requirements to offset demand for utilities, as with the Project. As discussed above, Project impacts related to utilities would be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to utilities would be less than significant. Page 209 20. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? R (b) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). R (c) Does the project have environmental effects which cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? R (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The Project Site is completely developed and is located in an urbanized area of the City. The Project would not degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal (refer to response to Checklist Topic 4 [Biological Resources]). As discussed in response to Checklist Question 5(a) (Cultural Resources – Historical Resources), Checklist Question 5(b) (Cultural Resources – Archaeological Resources) and Checklist Question 18(b) (Tribal Cultural Resources), with mitigation, the Project would not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: Page 210 CUL-1: In the event a potentially significant cultural resource is encountered during earthwork activities, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the find shall cease and workers shall avoid altering the materials until a qualified archaeologist who meets the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology has evaluated the situation. The Project Applicant shall include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction activities shall be recorded on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria by a qualified archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, glass, ceramics, wood, or shell artifacts, or features including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. If the resource is determined to be significant under CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and implement a research design and archaeological data recovery plan that will capture those categories of data for which the site is significant in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The archaeologist shall also perform appropriate technical analyses, prepare a comprehensive report complete with methods, results, and recommendations, and provide for the permanent curation or repatriation of the recovered resources in cooperation with the designated most likely descendant as needed. The report shall be submitted to the City of Orange, the South Central Coastal Information Center, and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), if required. TCR-1: Retain Tribal Monitor/Consultant. The Project Applicant shall retain and compensate a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the Project Site area. The Tribal monitor/consultant shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground-disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant shall complete daily monitoring logs that provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when Project grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting TRCs. TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal and Archaeological Resources. Upon discovery of any tribal or archaeological cultural resources, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find shall cease until the find can be assessed. All tribal and archaeological cultural resources unearthed as a result of construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The Tribe monitor/consultant could Page 211 request preservation in place or recovery for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project during evaluation and if necessary, additional protective mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 (f)). If a resource is determined to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, shall be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources. TCR-3: Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) (Unique Archaeological Resources). Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. All TCRs shall be returned to the Tribe. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. TCR-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objections. If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the Project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 150-foot buffer of the find) shall cease, and the County Coroner shall be contacted. If the human remains are determined to be Native American in origin by the County Coroner, the Tribal monitor/consultant shall immediately notify the NAHC as mandated by state law to establish the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). TCR-5: Kizh-Gabrieleño Procedures for Burial and Funerary Remains. If the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation is designated the MLD, the Koos-nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. In the event that burial and funerary remains are encountered, all prepared soil and cremation soils shall be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Prior to the continuation of ground-disturbing activities, the Project Applicant shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the Project Site for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains shall be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe monitor/consultant shall make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the Project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials could be removed. The Tribe monitor/consultant shall work closely with a qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe monitor/consultant, documentation shall be taken that Page 212 includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe monitor/consultant for data recovery purposes. Cremations shall either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location would be considered a cemetery, and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and the NAHC. No scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains shall be allowed. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony shall be removed to a secure container on site, if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project Site but at a location agreed upon between the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and the Project Applicant at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. TCR-6: Professional Standards. Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction activities shall be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in Southern California. The Tribal monitor/consultant shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). As discussed throughout this MND, the project would not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulative considerable. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: None Page 213 c) Does the project have environmental effects which cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? As discussed in response to Checklist Question 9(b) (Hazards and Hazardous Materials – Risk of Upset), with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-3, the project would not have environmental effects which cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the soils in the southeastern corner of the Project Site, as indicated on Figure 2 of the Limited Phase II ESA dated September 6, 2019, shall be excavated to a depth of approximately 2 feet bgs. Deeper removals may be necessary in the vicinity of step-out boring LB1-SW2 and shall be confirmed by a California-registered Professional Geologist or Engineer with environmental consulting experience during removal activities (refer to Figure 2 of the Limited Phase II ESA dated September 6, 2019). Upon completion of removal activities, confirmation soil samples will be collected from the resulting excavation area to ensure that the dieldrin-impacted soil has been effectively removed. All work will be completed under the oversight of a California-registered Professional Geologist or Engineer with environmental consulting experience. All excavated soil shall be disposed of at an appropriate landfill or other waste receival facility. HAZ-2: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified professional to identify any ACMs in the existing building. If ACMs are identified, abatement of the ACMs shall conducted by a qualified professional in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. HAZ-3: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified professional to identify any LBP in the existing building. If LBP is identified, abatement of the LBP shall conducted by a qualified professional in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact APPENDICES PARK PLAZA MEMORY CARE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1866-19 Lead Agency: City of Orange Community Development Department • Planning Division 300 East Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866-1591 (714) 744 7220 (714) 744 7222 (Fax) www.cityoforange.org Prepared by: CAJA Environmental Services, LLC 15350 Sherman Way, Suite 315 Van Nuys, CA 91406 (310) 469 6700 May 2020 APPENDICES A. AQ and GHG Modeling Results B. Biological Resources 1. Arborist Report 2. Arborist Site Plan with Trees C. Cultural Resources 1. Historic Resources Report 2. Archaeological Resources Letter D. Energy Calculations E. Geology & Soils 1. Geotechnical Report 2. Paleontological Resources Letter F. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1. Phase I ESA 2. Limited Phase II ESA G. Preliminary WQMP H. Noise Modeling Results I. Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX A • AQ and GHG Modeling Results Project Characteristics - Applicant Info Land Use - Applicant Info Construction Phase - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Demolition - No Construction Trips and VMT - No Construction Vehicle Trips - Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis - Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Energy Use - 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Quality Restaurant 5.96 1000sqft 0.14 5,959.00 0 Parking Lot 34.00 1000sqft 0.78 34,001.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2018Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing Orange County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 1 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/14/2018 11/30/2018 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,960.00 5,959.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 34,000.00 34,001.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 18.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 44.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 38.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 83.84 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 83.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 83.84 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 2 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 3 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0270 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 Energy 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 155.5175 155.5175 4.6000e- 003 2.1400e- 003 156.2688 Mobile 0.1740 0.7654 2.3823 7.5800e- 003 0.6276 8.9400e- 003 0.6365 0.1681 8.4300e- 003 0.1765 0.0000 696.1948 696.1948 0.0322 0.0000 697.0008 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1043 0.0000 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5739 7.9141 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 Total 0.2094 0.8412 2.4465 8.0300e- 003 0.6276 0.0147 0.6423 0.1681 0.0142 0.1823 1.6782 859.6273 861.3055 0.1614 3.6000e- 003 866.4114 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Highest CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 4 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0270 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 Energy 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 155.5175 155.5175 4.6000e- 003 2.1400e- 003 156.2688 Mobile 0.1740 0.7654 2.3823 7.5800e- 003 0.6276 8.9400e- 003 0.6365 0.1681 8.4300e- 003 0.1765 0.0000 696.1948 696.1948 0.0322 0.0000 697.0008 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1043 0.0000 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5739 7.9141 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 Total 0.2094 0.8412 2.4465 8.0300e- 003 0.6276 0.0147 0.6423 0.1681 0.0142 0.1823 1.6782 859.6273 861.3055 0.1614 3.6000e- 003 866.4114 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 12/1/2018 11/30/2018 5 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 5 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 0.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.78 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 6 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 7 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 8 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.1740 0.7654 2.3823 7.5800e- 003 0.6276 8.9400e- 003 0.6365 0.1681 8.4300e- 003 0.1765 0.0000 696.1948 696.1948 0.0322 0.0000 697.0008 Unmitigated 0.1740 0.7654 2.3823 7.5800e- 003 0.6276 8.9400e- 003 0.6365 0.1681 8.4300e- 003 0.1765 0.0000 696.1948 696.1948 0.0322 0.0000 697.0008 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quality Restaurant 499.69 499.69 499.69 1,654,979 1,654,979 Total 499.69 499.69 499.69 1,654,979 1,654,979 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 100 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 9 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 73.0550 73.0550 3.0200e- 003 6.2000e- 004 73.3164 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 73.0550 73.0550 3.0200e- 003 6.2000e- 004 73.3164 NaturalGas Mitigated 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 82.4625 82.4625 1.5800e- 003 1.5100e- 003 82.9525 NaturalGas Unmitigated 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 82.4625 82.4625 1.5800e- 003 1.5100e- 003 82.9525 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.548103 0.044682 0.212159 0.122193 0.018321 0.005803 0.023836 0.015181 0.001595 0.001677 0.004786 0.000580 0.001085 Quality Restaurant 0.548103 0.044682 0.212159 0.122193 0.018321 0.005803 0.023836 0.015181 0.001595 0.001677 0.004786 0.000580 0.001085 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 10 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 1.54529e +006 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 82.4625 82.4625 1.5800e- 003 1.5100e- 003 82.9525 Total 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 82.4625 82.4625 1.5800e- 003 1.5100e- 003 82.9525 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 1.54529e +006 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 82.4625 82.4625 1.5800e- 003 1.5100e- 003 82.9525 Total 8.3300e- 003 0.0758 0.0636 4.5000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0000 82.4625 82.4625 1.5800e- 003 1.5100e- 003 82.9525 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 11 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Parking Lot 11900.3 3.7917 1.6000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.8053 Quality Restaurant 217384 69.2633 2.8600e- 003 5.9000e- 004 69.5111 Total 73.0550 3.0200e- 003 6.2000e- 004 73.3164 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Parking Lot 11900.3 3.7917 1.6000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.8053 Quality Restaurant 217384 69.2633 2.8600e- 003 5.9000e- 004 69.5111 Total 73.0550 3.0200e- 003 6.2000e- 004 73.3164 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 12 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0270 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 Unmitigated 0.0270 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0237 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 Total 0.0270 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 13 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0237 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 Total 0.0270 0.0000 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 14 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 Unmitigated 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 1.80906 / 0.115472 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 Total 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 15 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 1.80906 / 0.115472 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 Total 8.4881 0.0593 1.4600e- 003 10.4049 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Unmitigated 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 16 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 5.44 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Total 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 5.44 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Total 1.1043 0.0653 0.0000 2.7358 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 17 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 4:01 PMPage 18 of 18 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - Applicant Info Land Use - Applicant Info Construction Phase - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Demolition - No Construction Trips and VMT - No Construction Vehicle Trips - Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis - Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Energy Use - 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Quality Restaurant 5.96 1000sqft 0.14 5,959.00 0 Parking Lot 34.00 1000sqft 0.78 34,001.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2018Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing Orange County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 1 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/14/2018 11/30/2018 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,960.00 5,959.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 34,000.00 34,001.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 18.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 44.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 38.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 83.84 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 83.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 83.84 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 2 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 3 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Energy 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Mobile 0.9963 3.9909 13.4666 0.0431 3.5100 0.0491 3.5591 0.9386 0.0463 0.9849 4,361.965 1 4,361.965 1 0.1968 4,366.884 3 Total 1.1902 4.4060 13.8194 0.0456 3.5100 0.0806 3.5906 0.9386 0.0778 1.0164 4,860.052 2 4,860.052 2 0.2063 9.1300e- 003 4,867.931 8 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Energy 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Mobile 0.9963 3.9909 13.4666 0.0431 3.5100 0.0491 3.5591 0.9386 0.0463 0.9849 4,361.965 1 4,361.965 1 0.1968 4,366.884 3 Total 1.1902 4.4060 13.8194 0.0456 3.5100 0.0806 3.5906 0.9386 0.0778 1.0164 4,860.052 2 4,860.052 2 0.2063 9.1300e- 003 4,867.931 8 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 4 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 12/1/2018 11/30/2018 5 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 0.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.78 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 5 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 6 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 7 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.9963 3.9909 13.4666 0.0431 3.5100 0.0491 3.5591 0.9386 0.0463 0.9849 4,361.965 1 4,361.965 1 0.1968 4,366.884 3 Unmitigated 0.9963 3.9909 13.4666 0.0431 3.5100 0.0491 3.5591 0.9386 0.0463 0.9849 4,361.965 1 4,361.965 1 0.1968 4,366.884 3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quality Restaurant 499.69 499.69 499.69 1,654,979 1,654,979 Total 499.69 499.69 499.69 1,654,979 1,654,979 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 100 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 8 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.548103 0.044682 0.212159 0.122193 0.018321 0.005803 0.023836 0.015181 0.001595 0.001677 0.004786 0.000580 0.001085 Quality Restaurant 0.548103 0.044682 0.212159 0.122193 0.018321 0.005803 0.023836 0.015181 0.001595 0.001677 0.004786 0.000580 0.001085 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 9 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 4233.67 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Total 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 4.23367 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Total 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 10 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Unmitigated 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Total 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 11 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Total 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 12 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:51 PMPage 13 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - Applicant Info Land Use - Applicant Info Construction Phase - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Demolition - No Construction Trips and VMT - No Construction Vehicle Trips - Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis - Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Energy Use - 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Quality Restaurant 5.96 1000sqft 0.14 5,959.00 0 Parking Lot 34.00 1000sqft 0.78 34,001.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2018Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing Orange County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 1 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/14/2018 11/30/2018 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,960.00 5,959.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 34,000.00 34,001.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 18.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 44.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 38.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 83.84 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 83.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 83.84 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 2 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 3 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Energy 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Mobile 0.9859 4.1310 12.9226 0.0412 3.5100 0.0494 3.5593 0.9386 0.0465 0.9851 4,165.449 9 4,165.449 9 0.1956 4,170.340 1 Total 1.1797 4.5461 13.2754 0.0436 3.5100 0.0809 3.5909 0.9386 0.0781 1.0167 4,663.536 9 4,663.536 9 0.2052 9.1300e- 003 4,671.387 6 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Energy 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Mobile 0.9859 4.1310 12.9226 0.0412 3.5100 0.0494 3.5593 0.9386 0.0465 0.9851 4,165.449 9 4,165.449 9 0.1956 4,170.340 1 Total 1.1797 4.5461 13.2754 0.0436 3.5100 0.0809 3.5909 0.9386 0.0781 1.0167 4,663.536 9 4,663.536 9 0.2052 9.1300e- 003 4,671.387 6 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 4 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 12/1/2018 11/30/2018 5 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 0.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.78 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 5 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 6 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 7 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.9859 4.1310 12.9226 0.0412 3.5100 0.0494 3.5593 0.9386 0.0465 0.9851 4,165.449 9 4,165.449 9 0.1956 4,170.340 1 Unmitigated 0.9859 4.1310 12.9226 0.0412 3.5100 0.0494 3.5593 0.9386 0.0465 0.9851 4,165.449 9 4,165.449 9 0.1956 4,170.340 1 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quality Restaurant 499.69 499.69 499.69 1,654,979 1,654,979 Total 499.69 499.69 499.69 1,654,979 1,654,979 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 100 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 8 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.548103 0.044682 0.212159 0.122193 0.018321 0.005803 0.023836 0.015181 0.001595 0.001677 0.004786 0.000580 0.001085 Quality Restaurant 0.548103 0.044682 0.212159 0.122193 0.018321 0.005803 0.023836 0.015181 0.001595 0.001677 0.004786 0.000580 0.001085 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 9 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 4233.67 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Total 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality Restaurant 4.23367 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Total 0.0457 0.4151 0.3487 2.4900e- 003 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 0.0315 498.0783 498.0783 9.5500e- 003 9.1300e- 003 501.0381 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 10 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Unmitigated 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Total 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 11 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Total 0.1482 4.0000e- 005 4.1400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.7500e- 003 8.7500e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.3500e- 003 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 12 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/30/2019 3:48 PMPage 13 of 13 Park Plaza Memory Care - Existing - Orange County, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 15.00 Space 0.57 24,834.00 0 Congregate Care (Assisted Living)32.00 Dwelling Unit 0.35 30.11 36 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Park Plaza Memory Care - Future Orange County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 1 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - Applicant Info Land Use - Applicant Info Construction Phase - Applicant Info Off-road Equipment - COnsultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Trips and VMT - Consultant Assumptions Demolition - Consultant Assumptions Grading - Applicant Info Vehicle Trips - Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis - Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Trip rate adjusted to account for per 36 beds, not per 32 dwelling units. Woodstoves - Applicant Info. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes SCAQMD Rule 403 control efficiences Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 46 tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM10PercentReducti on 61 55 tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM25PercentReducti on 61 55 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 39.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 300.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 33.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 32.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 2 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual tblFireplaces NumberGas 27.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 3.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.60 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 16.00 0.92 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,000.00 24,834.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 32,000.00 30.11 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.13 0.57 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.00 0.35 tblLandUse Population 92.00 36.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 40.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 8.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 10.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 40.60 41.00 tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 19.20 19.00 tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 40.20 40.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.20 4.66 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.44 4.66 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 3 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.74 4.66 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 4 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.1935 1.7868 1.6254 3.1600e- 003 0.0974 0.0875 0.1849 0.0253 0.0817 0.1070 0.0000 280.0454 280.0454 0.0633 0.0000 281.6272 2021 0.0807 0.6648 0.6918 1.2800e- 003 0.0224 0.0330 0.0554 6.0100e- 003 0.0308 0.0368 0.0000 111.6716 111.6716 0.0254 0.0000 112.3055 Maximum 0.1935 1.7868 1.6254 3.1600e- 003 0.0974 0.0875 0.1849 0.0253 0.0817 0.1070 0.0000 280.0454 280.0454 0.0633 0.0000 281.6272 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.1935 1.7867 1.6254 3.1600e- 003 0.0518 0.0875 0.1393 0.0140 0.0817 0.0957 0.0000 280.0452 280.0452 0.0633 0.0000 281.6269 2021 0.0807 0.6648 0.6918 1.2800e- 003 0.0137 0.0330 0.0466 3.8500e- 003 0.0308 0.0347 0.0000 111.6715 111.6715 0.0254 0.0000 112.3054 Maximum 0.1935 1.7867 1.6254 3.1600e- 003 0.0518 0.0875 0.1393 0.0140 0.0817 0.0957 0.0000 280.0452 280.0452 0.0633 0.0000 281.6269 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.36 0.00 22.62 43.08 0.00 9.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 5 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0121 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 Energy 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 62.8151 62.8151 2.1600e- 003 7.3000e- 004 63.0860 Mobile 0.0431 0.1935 0.6280 2.4100e- 003 0.2176 1.7700e- 003 0.2193 0.0583 1.6500e- 003 0.0599 0.0000 221.9941 221.9941 9.1100e- 003 0.0000 222.2218 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9273 0.0000 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6615 13.3028 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Total 0.0572 0.2142 0.9661 2.5400e- 003 0.2176 4.9500e- 003 0.2225 0.0583 4.8300e- 003 0.0631 6.5888 298.6514 305.2402 0.4306 2.4500e- 003 316.7333 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2020 3-31-2020 0.5123 0.5123 2 4-1-2020 6-30-2020 0.4793 0.4793 3 7-1-2020 9-30-2020 0.4846 0.4846 4 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 0.4854 0.4854 5 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 0.4343 0.4343 6 4-1-2021 6-30-2021 0.3150 0.3150 Highest 0.5123 0.5123 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 6 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0121 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 Energy 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 62.8151 62.8151 2.1600e- 003 7.3000e- 004 63.0860 Mobile 0.0431 0.1935 0.6280 2.4100e- 003 0.2176 1.7700e- 003 0.2193 0.0583 1.6500e- 003 0.0599 0.0000 221.9941 221.9941 9.1100e- 003 0.0000 222.2218 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9273 0.0000 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6615 13.3028 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Total 0.0572 0.2142 0.9661 2.5400e- 003 0.2176 4.9500e- 003 0.2225 0.0583 4.8300e- 003 0.0631 6.5888 298.6514 305.2402 0.4306 2.4500e- 003 316.7333 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 7 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2020 2/14/2020 5 33 2 Grading Grading 2/17/2020 3/31/2020 5 32 3 Building Construction Building Construction 4/1/2020 5/25/2021 5 300 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/1/2021 5/25/2021 5 39 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 61; Residential Outdoor: 20; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,490 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.92 Acres of Paving: 0.57 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 8 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts 2 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 8.00 0.00 332.00 14.70 6.90 40.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 5 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 33.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 7.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 9 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0360 0.0000 0.0360 5.4400e- 003 0.0000 5.4400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0166 0.1523 0.1609 2.6000e- 004 8.5400e- 003 8.5400e- 003 8.1200e- 003 8.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.4075 22.4075 4.9400e- 003 0.0000 22.5310 Total 0.0166 0.1523 0.1609 2.6000e- 004 0.0360 8.5400e- 003 0.0445 5.4400e- 003 8.1200e- 003 0.0136 0.0000 22.4075 22.4075 4.9400e- 003 0.0000 22.5310 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Water Exposed Area Clean Paved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 10 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 2.2700e- 003 0.0792 0.0212 2.4000e- 004 5.6900e- 003 2.9000e- 004 5.9800e- 003 1.5600e- 003 2.8000e- 004 1.8400e- 003 0.0000 24.0863 24.0863 2.4300e- 003 0.0000 24.1471 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.1000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 4.0900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4600e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2542 1.2542 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2549 Total 2.7800e- 003 0.0795 0.0253 2.5000e- 004 7.1400e- 003 3.0000e- 004 7.4400e- 003 1.9400e- 003 2.9000e- 004 2.2300e- 003 0.0000 25.3405 25.3405 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 25.4020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 2.4500e- 003 0.0000 2.4500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0166 0.1523 0.1609 2.6000e- 004 8.5400e- 003 8.5400e- 003 8.1200e- 003 8.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.4074 22.4074 4.9400e- 003 0.0000 22.5309 Total 0.0166 0.1523 0.1609 2.6000e- 004 0.0162 8.5400e- 003 0.0247 2.4500e- 003 8.1200e- 003 0.0106 0.0000 22.4074 22.4074 4.9400e- 003 0.0000 22.5309 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 11 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 2.2700e- 003 0.0792 0.0212 2.4000e- 004 3.7100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 4.0000e- 003 1.0700e- 003 2.8000e- 004 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 24.0863 24.0863 2.4300e- 003 0.0000 24.1471 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.1000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 4.0900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.2542 1.2542 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2549 Total 2.7800e- 003 0.0795 0.0253 2.5000e- 004 4.5800e- 003 3.0000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 1.3100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 003 0.0000 25.3405 25.3405 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 25.4020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0125 0.0000 0.0125 6.6700e- 003 0.0000 6.6700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0237 0.2489 0.1850 3.6000e- 004 0.0115 0.0115 0.0109 0.0109 0.0000 31.0575 31.0575 7.8100e- 003 0.0000 31.2527 Total 0.0237 0.2489 0.1850 3.6000e- 004 0.0125 0.0115 0.0241 6.6700e- 003 0.0109 0.0175 0.0000 31.0575 31.0575 7.8100e- 003 0.0000 31.2527 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 12 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.2000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.9600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.7600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7700e- 003 4.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.5203 1.5203 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5211 Total 6.2000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.9600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.7600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7700e- 003 4.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.5203 1.5203 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5211 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 5.6400e- 003 0.0000 5.6400e- 003 3.0000e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0237 0.2489 0.1850 3.6000e- 004 0.0115 0.0115 0.0109 0.0109 0.0000 31.0574 31.0574 7.8100e- 003 0.0000 31.2526 Total 0.0237 0.2489 0.1850 3.6000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 0.0115 0.0172 3.0000e- 003 0.0109 0.0139 0.0000 31.0574 31.0574 7.8100e- 003 0.0000 31.2526 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 13 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.2000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.9600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.0600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.5203 1.5203 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5211 Total 6.2000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.9600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.0600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.5203 1.5203 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5211 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1348 1.2235 1.1286 1.7700e- 003 0.0665 0.0665 0.0619 0.0619 0.0000 152.0506 152.0506 0.0459 0.0000 153.1986 Total 0.1348 1.2235 1.1286 1.7700e- 003 0.0665 0.0665 0.0619 0.0619 0.0000 152.0506 152.0506 0.0459 0.0000 153.1986 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 14 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.2500e- 003 0.0731 0.0199 1.7000e- 004 4.3400e- 003 3.8000e- 004 4.7200e- 003 1.2500e- 003 3.6000e- 004 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 16.7842 16.7842 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 16.8192 Worker 0.0127 8.8800e- 003 0.1008 3.4000e- 004 0.0357 2.4000e- 004 0.0359 9.4800e- 003 2.2000e- 004 9.7000e- 003 0.0000 30.8850 30.8850 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 30.9026 Total 0.0149 0.0820 0.1207 5.1000e- 004 0.0400 6.2000e- 004 0.0406 0.0107 5.8000e- 004 0.0113 0.0000 47.6691 47.6691 2.1000e- 003 0.0000 47.7218 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1348 1.2235 1.1286 1.7700e- 003 0.0665 0.0665 0.0619 0.0619 0.0000 152.0504 152.0504 0.0459 0.0000 153.1984 Total 0.1348 1.2235 1.1286 1.7700e- 003 0.0665 0.0665 0.0619 0.0619 0.0000 152.0504 152.0504 0.0459 0.0000 153.1984 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 15 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.2500e- 003 0.0731 0.0199 1.7000e- 004 2.9200e- 003 3.8000e- 004 3.3000e- 003 9.0000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 16.7842 16.7842 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 16.8192 Worker 0.0127 8.8800e- 003 0.1008 3.4000e- 004 0.0215 2.4000e- 004 0.0217 5.9800e- 003 2.2000e- 004 6.2000e- 003 0.0000 30.8850 30.8850 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 30.9026 Total 0.0149 0.0820 0.1207 5.1000e- 004 0.0244 6.2000e- 004 0.0250 6.8800e- 003 5.8000e- 004 7.4700e- 003 0.0000 47.6691 47.6691 2.1000e- 003 0.0000 47.7218 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0638 0.5862 0.5822 9.3000e- 004 0.0303 0.0303 0.0282 0.0282 0.0000 79.4936 79.4936 0.0238 0.0000 80.0895 Total 0.0638 0.5862 0.5822 9.3000e- 004 0.0303 0.0303 0.0282 0.0282 0.0000 79.4936 79.4936 0.0238 0.0000 80.0895 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 16 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.8000e- 004 0.0344 9.6300e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.2700e- 003 7.0000e- 005 2.3400e- 003 6.5000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 8.6999 8.6999 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 8.7175 Worker 6.2300e- 003 4.1900e- 003 0.0488 1.7000e- 004 0.0187 1.2000e- 004 0.0188 4.9500e- 003 1.1000e- 004 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 15.5876 15.5876 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 15.5960 Total 7.2100e- 003 0.0385 0.0585 2.6000e- 004 0.0209 1.9000e- 004 0.0211 5.6000e- 003 1.8000e- 004 5.7900e- 003 0.0000 24.2875 24.2875 1.0300e- 003 0.0000 24.3135 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0638 0.5862 0.5822 9.3000e- 004 0.0303 0.0303 0.0282 0.0282 0.0000 79.4935 79.4935 0.0238 0.0000 80.0895 Total 0.0638 0.5862 0.5822 9.3000e- 004 0.0303 0.0303 0.0282 0.0282 0.0000 79.4935 79.4935 0.0238 0.0000 80.0895 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 17 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.8000e- 004 0.0344 9.6300e- 003 9.0000e- 005 1.5300e- 003 7.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 003 4.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 8.6999 8.6999 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 8.7175 Worker 6.2300e- 003 4.1900e- 003 0.0488 1.7000e- 004 0.0112 1.2000e- 004 0.0113 3.1300e- 003 1.1000e- 004 3.2400e- 003 0.0000 15.5876 15.5876 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 15.5960 Total 7.2100e- 003 0.0385 0.0585 2.6000e- 004 0.0128 1.9000e- 004 0.0129 3.6000e- 003 1.8000e- 004 3.7800e- 003 0.0000 24.2875 24.2875 1.0300e- 003 0.0000 24.3135 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 3.5500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.6900e- 003 0.0397 0.0473 8.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 0.0000 6.6385 6.6385 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.6499 Total 9.2400e- 003 0.0397 0.0473 8.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 0.0000 6.6385 6.6385 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.6499 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 18 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.9200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5100e- 003 4.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.2520 1.2520 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2526 Total 5.0000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.9200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5100e- 003 4.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.2520 1.2520 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2526 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 3.5500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.6900e- 003 0.0397 0.0473 8.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 0.0000 6.6385 6.6385 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.6498 Total 9.2400e- 003 0.0397 0.0473 8.0000e- 005 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 2.4500e- 003 0.0000 6.6385 6.6385 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.6498 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 19 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.9200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.2520 1.2520 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2526 Total 5.0000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.9200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.2520 1.2520 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2526 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 20 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0431 0.1935 0.6280 2.4100e- 003 0.2176 1.7700e- 003 0.2193 0.0583 1.6500e- 003 0.0599 0.0000 221.9941 221.9941 9.1100e- 003 0.0000 222.2218 Unmitigated 0.0431 0.1935 0.6280 2.4100e- 003 0.2176 1.7700e- 003 0.2193 0.0583 1.6500e- 003 0.0599 0.0000 221.9941 221.9941 9.1100e- 003 0.0000 222.2218 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Congregate Care (Assisted Living)149.12 149.12 149.12 573,628 573,628 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 149.12 149.12 149.12 573,628 573,628 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.00 19.00 41.00 100 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966 Parking Lot 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 21 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 43.3011 43.3011 1.7900e- 003 3.7000e- 004 43.4560 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 43.3011 43.3011 1.7900e- 003 3.7000e- 004 43.4560 NaturalGas Mitigated 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 19.5140 19.5140 3.7000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 19.6300 NaturalGas Unmitigated 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 19.5140 19.5140 3.7000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 19.6300 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 22 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 365679 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 19.5140 19.5140 3.7000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 19.6300 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 19.5140 19.5140 3.7000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 19.6300 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 365679 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 19.5140 19.5140 3.7000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 19.6300 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.9700e- 003 0.0169 7.1700e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 19.5140 19.5140 3.7000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 19.6300 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 23 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 127210 40.5317 1.6700e- 003 3.5000e- 004 40.6767 Parking Lot 8691.9 2.7694 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7793 Total 43.3011 1.7800e- 003 3.7000e- 004 43.4560 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 127210 40.5317 1.6700e- 003 3.5000e- 004 40.6767 Parking Lot 8691.9 2.7694 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7793 Total 43.3011 1.7800e- 003 3.7000e- 004 43.4560 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 24 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0121 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 Unmitigated 0.0121 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.7100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0100 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 Total 0.0121 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 25 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.7100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0100 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 Total 0.0121 3.8200e- 003 0.3309 2.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 1.8200e- 003 0.0000 0.5394 0.5394 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5525 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 26 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Unmitigated 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 2.08493 / 1.31441 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 27 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 2.08493 / 1.31441 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 13.9642 0.0685 1.7200e- 003 16.1883 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Unmitigated 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 28 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 29.2 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 29.2 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.9273 0.3503 0.0000 14.6847 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 29 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:54 PMPage 30 of 30 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 15.00 Space 0.57 24,834.00 0 Congregate Care (Assisted Living)32.00 Dwelling Unit 0.35 30.11 36 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Park Plaza Memory Care - Future Orange County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 1 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - Applicant Info Land Use - Applicant Info Construction Phase - Applicant Info Off-road Equipment - COnsultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Trips and VMT - Consultant Assumptions Demolition - Consultant Assumptions Grading - Applicant Info Vehicle Trips - Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis - Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Trip rate adjusted to account for per 36 beds, not per 32 dwelling units. Woodstoves - Applicant Info. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes SCAQMD Rule 403 control efficiences Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 46 tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM10PercentReducti on 61 55 tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM25PercentReducti on 61 55 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 39.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 300.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 33.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 32.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 2 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer tblFireplaces NumberGas 27.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 3.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.60 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 16.00 0.92 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,000.00 24,834.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 32,000.00 30.11 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.13 0.57 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.00 0.35 tblLandUse Population 92.00 36.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 40.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 8.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 10.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 40.60 41.00 tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 19.20 19.00 tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 40.20 40.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.20 4.66 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.44 4.66 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 3 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.74 4.66 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 4 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 1.5219 15.5827 12.7301 0.0309 2.6190 0.7205 3.1546 0.4495 0.6787 1.1254 0.0000 3,198.742 1 3,198.742 1 0.5404 0.0000 3,211.0793 2021 1.8756 14.1631 15.1215 0.0279 0.4918 0.7183 1.2101 0.1314 0.6769 0.8083 0.0000 2,685.786 0 2,685.786 0 0.5597 0.0000 2,699.779 3 Maximum 1.8756 15.5827 15.1215 0.0309 2.6190 0.7205 3.1546 0.4495 0.6787 1.1254 0.0000 3,198.742 1 3,198.742 1 0.5597 0.0000 3,211.079 3 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 1.5219 15.5827 12.7301 0.0309 1.2622 0.7205 1.7977 0.2292 0.6787 0.8850 0.0000 3,198.742 1 3,198.742 1 0.5404 0.0000 3,211.079 3 2021 1.8756 14.1631 15.1215 0.0279 0.2983 0.7183 1.0167 0.0840 0.6769 0.7608 0.0000 2,685.786 0 2,685.786 0 0.5597 0.0000 2,699.779 3 Maximum 1.8756 15.5827 15.1215 0.0309 1.2622 0.7205 1.7977 0.2292 0.6787 0.8850 0.0000 3,198.742 1 3,198.742 1 0.5597 0.0000 3,211.079 3 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.84 0.00 35.52 46.09 0.00 14.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 5 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Energy 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Mobile 0.2475 1.0121 3.5758 0.0137 1.2167 9.7100e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0400e- 003 0.3344 1,390.049 8 1,390.049 8 0.0556 1,391.440 5 Total 0.3500 1.1350 6.2624 0.0144 1.2167 0.0318 1.2485 0.3254 0.0311 0.3565 0.0000 1,512.672 6 1,512.672 6 0.0625 2.1600e- 003 1,514.879 1 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Energy 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Mobile 0.2475 1.0121 3.5758 0.0137 1.2167 9.7100e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0400e- 003 0.3344 1,390.049 8 1,390.049 8 0.0556 1,391.440 5 Total 0.3500 1.1350 6.2624 0.0144 1.2167 0.0318 1.2485 0.3254 0.0311 0.3565 0.0000 1,512.672 6 1,512.672 6 0.0625 2.1600e- 003 1,514.879 1 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 6 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2020 2/14/2020 5 33 2 Grading Grading 2/17/2020 3/31/2020 5 32 3 Building Construction Building Construction 4/1/2020 5/25/2021 5 300 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/1/2021 5/25/2021 5 39 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 61; Residential Outdoor: 20; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,490 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.92 Acres of Paving: 0.57 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 7 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts 2 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 8.00 0.00 332.00 14.70 6.90 40.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 5 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 33.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 7.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 8 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.1795 0.0000 2.1795 0.3300 0.0000 0.3300 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 0.5175 0.5175 0.4920 0.4920 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Total 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 2.1795 0.5175 2.6970 0.3300 0.4920 0.8219 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Water Exposed Area Clean Paved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 9 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1366 4.6073 1.2697 0.0145 0.3501 0.0175 0.3676 0.0958 0.0167 0.1125 1,614.569 2 1,614.569 2 0.1615 1,618.606 4 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0307 0.0194 0.2619 8.7000e- 004 0.0894 5.9000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.4000e- 004 0.0243 87.2035 87.2035 1.9900e- 003 87.2532 Total 0.1674 4.6267 1.5315 0.0154 0.4396 0.0180 0.4576 0.1195 0.0172 0.1368 1,701.772 7 1,701.772 7 0.1635 1,705.859 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.9808 0.0000 0.9808 0.1485 0.0000 0.1485 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 0.5175 0.5175 0.4920 0.4920 0.0000 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Total 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 0.9808 0.5175 1.4983 0.1485 0.4920 0.6405 0.0000 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 10 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1366 4.6073 1.2697 0.0145 0.2278 0.0175 0.2452 0.0658 0.0167 0.0825 1,614.569 2 1,614.569 2 0.1615 1,618.606 4 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0307 0.0194 0.2619 8.7000e- 004 0.0537 5.9000e- 004 0.0543 0.0149 5.4000e- 004 0.0155 87.2035 87.2035 1.9900e- 003 87.2532 Total 0.1674 4.6267 1.5315 0.0154 0.2814 0.0180 0.2995 0.0807 0.0172 0.0980 1,701.772 7 1,701.772 7 0.1635 1,705.859 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7833 0.0000 0.7833 0.4171 0.0000 0.4171 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.7197 0.7197 0.6780 0.6780 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Total 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.7833 0.7197 1.5030 0.4171 0.6780 1.0951 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 11 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0384 0.0242 0.3273 1.0900e- 003 0.1118 7.4000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.8000e- 004 0.0303 109.0044 109.0044 2.4800e- 003 109.0665 Total 0.0384 0.0242 0.3273 1.0900e- 003 0.1118 7.4000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.8000e- 004 0.0303 109.0044 109.0044 2.4800e- 003 109.0665 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.3525 0.0000 0.3525 0.1877 0.0000 0.1877 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.7197 0.7197 0.6780 0.6780 0.0000 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Total 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.3525 0.7197 1.0722 0.1877 0.6780 0.8657 0.0000 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 12 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0384 0.0242 0.3273 1.0900e- 003 0.0671 7.4000e- 004 0.0678 0.0187 6.8000e- 004 0.0194 109.0044 109.0044 2.4800e- 003 109.0665 Total 0.0384 0.0242 0.3273 1.0900e- 003 0.0671 7.4000e- 004 0.0678 0.0187 6.8000e- 004 0.0194 109.0044 109.0044 2.4800e- 003 109.0665 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Total 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 13 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0224 0.7292 0.1925 1.7400e- 003 0.0447 3.8100e- 003 0.0485 0.0129 3.6400e- 003 0.0165 189.7903 189.7903 0.0154 190.1740 Worker 0.1268 0.0799 1.0802 3.6100e- 003 0.3689 2.4400e- 003 0.3713 0.0978 2.2500e- 003 0.1001 359.7144 359.7144 8.2000e- 003 359.9194 Total 0.1492 0.8091 1.2727 5.3500e- 003 0.4136 6.2500e- 003 0.4198 0.1107 5.8900e- 003 0.1166 549.5046 549.5046 0.0236 550.0934 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 0.0000 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Total 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 0.0000 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 14 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0224 0.7292 0.1925 1.7400e- 003 0.0300 3.8100e- 003 0.0338 9.2700e- 003 3.6400e- 003 0.0129 189.7903 189.7903 0.0154 190.1740 Worker 0.1268 0.0799 1.0802 3.6100e- 003 0.2214 2.4400e- 003 0.2238 0.0616 2.2500e- 003 0.0639 359.7144 359.7144 8.2000e- 003 359.9194 Total 0.1492 0.8091 1.2727 5.3500e- 003 0.2514 6.2500e- 003 0.2576 0.0709 5.8900e- 003 0.0768 549.5046 549.5046 0.0236 550.0934 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Total 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 15 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0187 0.6567 0.1781 1.7300e- 003 0.0447 1.3600e- 003 0.0461 0.0129 1.3000e- 003 0.0142 188.1548 188.1548 0.0148 188.5236 Worker 0.1191 0.0721 1.0023 3.4800e- 003 0.3689 2.3900e- 003 0.3713 0.0978 2.2000e- 003 0.1000 347.2241 347.2241 7.4400e- 003 347.4100 Total 0.1378 0.7288 1.1804 5.2100e- 003 0.4136 3.7500e- 003 0.4173 0.1107 3.5000e- 003 0.1142 535.3788 535.3788 0.0222 535.9336 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 0.0000 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Total 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 0.0000 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 16 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0187 0.6567 0.1781 1.7300e- 003 0.0300 1.3600e- 003 0.0314 9.2700e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0106 188.1548 188.1548 0.0148 188.5236 Worker 0.1191 0.0721 1.0023 3.4800e- 003 0.2214 2.3900e- 003 0.2237 0.0616 2.2000e- 003 0.0638 347.2241 347.2241 7.4400e- 003 347.4100 Total 0.1378 0.7288 1.1804 5.2100e- 003 0.2514 3.7500e- 003 0.2551 0.0709 3.5000e- 003 0.0744 535.3788 535.3788 0.0222 535.9336 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.1819 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2919 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Total 0.4738 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 17 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0253 0.0153 0.2126 7.4000e- 004 0.0782 5.1000e- 004 0.0788 0.0208 4.7000e- 004 0.0212 73.6536 73.6536 1.5800e- 003 73.6930 Total 0.0253 0.0153 0.2126 7.4000e- 004 0.0782 5.1000e- 004 0.0788 0.0208 4.7000e- 004 0.0212 73.6536 73.6536 1.5800e- 003 73.6930 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.1819 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2919 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Total 0.4738 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 18 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0253 0.0153 0.2126 7.4000e- 004 0.0470 5.1000e- 004 0.0475 0.0131 4.7000e- 004 0.0135 73.6536 73.6536 1.5800e- 003 73.6930 Total 0.0253 0.0153 0.2126 7.4000e- 004 0.0470 5.1000e- 004 0.0475 0.0131 4.7000e- 004 0.0135 73.6536 73.6536 1.5800e- 003 73.6930 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 19 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.2475 1.0121 3.5758 0.0137 1.2167 9.7100e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0400e- 003 0.3344 1,390.049 8 1,390.049 8 0.0556 1,391.440 5 Unmitigated 0.2475 1.0121 3.5758 0.0137 1.2167 9.7100e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0400e- 003 0.3344 1,390.049 8 1,390.049 8 0.0556 1,391.440 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Congregate Care (Assisted Living)149.12 149.12 149.12 573,628 573,628 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 149.12 149.12 149.12 573,628 573,628 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.00 19.00 41.00 100 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966 Parking Lot 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 20 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 21 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 1001.86 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 1.00186 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 22 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Unmitigated 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 1.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 9.3900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0803 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 4.8723 Total 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 23 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 1.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 9.3900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0803 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 4.8723 Total 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 24 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:47 PMPage 25 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 15.00 Space 0.57 24,834.00 0 Congregate Care (Assisted Living)32.00 Dwelling Unit 0.35 30.11 36 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Park Plaza Memory Care - Future Orange County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 1 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - Applicant Info Land Use - Applicant Info Construction Phase - Applicant Info Off-road Equipment - COnsultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Off-road Equipment - Consultant Assumptions Trips and VMT - Consultant Assumptions Demolition - Consultant Assumptions Grading - Applicant Info Vehicle Trips - Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Traffic Impact Analysis - Park Plaza Memory Care Project. June 2019. Trip rate adjusted to account for per 36 beds, not per 32 dwelling units. Woodstoves - Applicant Info. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes SCAQMD Rule 403 control efficiences Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 46 tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM10PercentReducti on 61 55 tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM25PercentReducti on 61 55 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 39.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 300.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 33.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 32.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 2 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter tblFireplaces NumberGas 27.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 3.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.60 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 16.00 0.92 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,000.00 24,834.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 32,000.00 30.11 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.13 0.57 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.00 0.35 tblLandUse Population 92.00 36.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 40.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 8.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 10.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 40.60 41.00 tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 19.20 19.00 tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 40.20 40.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.20 4.66 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.44 4.66 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 3 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.74 4.66 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 4 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 1.5352 15.5851 12.6668 0.0308 2.6190 0.7205 3.1547 0.4495 0.6787 1.1254 0.0000 3,181.1123 3,181.1123 0.5402 0.0000 3,193.499 2 2021 1.8956 14.1702 15.0449 0.0276 0.4918 0.7184 1.2102 0.1314 0.6769 0.8084 0.0000 2,658.618 8 2,658.618 8 0.5600 0.0000 2,672.618 0 Maximum 1.8956 15.5851 15.0449 0.0308 2.6190 0.7205 3.1547 0.4495 0.6787 1.1254 0.0000 3,181.112 3 3,181.112 3 0.5600 0.0000 3,193.499 2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 1.5352 15.5851 12.6668 0.0308 1.2622 0.7205 1.7979 0.2292 0.6787 0.8850 0.0000 3,181.1123 3,181.1123 0.5402 0.0000 3,193.499 2 2021 1.8956 14.1702 15.0449 0.0276 0.2983 0.7184 1.0167 0.0840 0.6769 0.7609 0.0000 2,658.618 8 2,658.618 8 0.5600 0.0000 2,672.618 0 Maximum 1.8956 15.5851 15.0449 0.0308 1.2622 0.7205 1.7979 0.2292 0.6787 0.8850 0.0000 3,181.112 3 3,181.112 3 0.5600 0.0000 3,193.499 2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.84 0.00 35.52 46.09 0.00 14.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 5 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Energy 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Mobile 0.2434 1.0449 3.3996 0.0131 1.2167 9.7500e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0800e- 003 0.3345 1,328.504 4 1,328.504 4 0.0553 1,329.885 8 Total 0.3459 1.1678 6.0862 0.0138 1.2167 0.0318 1.2486 0.3254 0.0311 0.3565 0.0000 1,451.127 2 1,451.127 2 0.0621 2.1600e- 003 1,453.324 4 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Energy 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Mobile 0.2434 1.0449 3.3996 0.0131 1.2167 9.7500e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0800e- 003 0.3345 1,328.504 4 1,328.504 4 0.0553 1,329.885 8 Total 0.3459 1.1678 6.0862 0.0138 1.2167 0.0318 1.2486 0.3254 0.0311 0.3565 0.0000 1,451.127 2 1,451.127 2 0.0621 2.1600e- 003 1,453.324 4 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 6 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2020 2/14/2020 5 33 2 Grading Grading 2/17/2020 3/31/2020 5 32 3 Building Construction Building Construction 4/1/2020 5/25/2021 5 300 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/1/2021 5/25/2021 5 39 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 61; Residential Outdoor: 20; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,490 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.92 Acres of Paving: 0.57 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 7 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Aerial Lifts 1 8.00 63 0.31 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts 2 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 8.00 0.00 332.00 14.70 6.90 40.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 5 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 33.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 7.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 8 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.1795 0.0000 2.1795 0.3300 0.0000 0.3300 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 0.5175 0.5175 0.4920 0.4920 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Total 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 2.1795 0.5175 2.6970 0.3300 0.4920 0.8219 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Water Exposed Area Clean Paved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 9 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1385 4.7122 1.3028 0.0144 0.3501 0.0176 0.3678 0.0958 0.0169 0.1127 1,601.613 2 1,601.613 2 0.1636 1,605.702 7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0347 0.0213 0.2420 8.3000e- 004 0.0894 5.9000e- 004 0.0900 0.0237 5.4000e- 004 0.0243 82.5297 82.5297 1.8800e- 003 82.5768 Total 0.1732 4.7334 1.5448 0.0152 0.4396 0.0182 0.4578 0.1195 0.0174 0.1369 1,684.142 9 1,684.142 9 0.1655 1,688.279 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.9808 0.0000 0.9808 0.1485 0.0000 0.1485 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 0.5175 0.5175 0.4920 0.4920 0.0000 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Total 1.0076 9.2329 9.7505 0.0156 0.9808 0.5175 1.4983 0.1485 0.4920 0.6405 0.0000 1,496.969 4 1,496.969 4 0.3300 1,505.219 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 10 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1385 4.7122 1.3028 0.0144 0.2278 0.0176 0.2454 0.0658 0.0169 0.0827 1,601.613 2 1,601.613 2 0.1636 1,605.702 7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0347 0.0213 0.2420 8.3000e- 004 0.0537 5.9000e- 004 0.0543 0.0149 5.4000e- 004 0.0155 82.5297 82.5297 1.8800e- 003 82.5768 Total 0.1732 4.7334 1.5448 0.0152 0.2814 0.0182 0.2996 0.0807 0.0174 0.0981 1,684.142 9 1,684.142 9 0.1655 1,688.279 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7833 0.0000 0.7833 0.4171 0.0000 0.4171 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.7197 0.7197 0.6780 0.6780 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Total 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.7833 0.7197 1.5030 0.4171 0.6780 1.0951 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 11 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0434 0.0266 0.3025 1.0300e- 003 0.1118 7.4000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.8000e- 004 0.0303 103.1621 103.1621 2.3500e- 003 103.2210 Total 0.0434 0.0266 0.3025 1.0300e- 003 0.1118 7.4000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.8000e- 004 0.0303 103.1621 103.1621 2.3500e- 003 103.2210 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.3525 0.0000 0.3525 0.1877 0.0000 0.1877 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.7197 0.7197 0.6780 0.6780 0.0000 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Total 1.4834 15.5585 11.5650 0.0222 0.3525 0.7197 1.0722 0.1877 0.6780 0.8657 0.0000 2,139.688 1 2,139.688 1 0.5379 2,153.135 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 12 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0434 0.0266 0.3025 1.0300e- 003 0.0671 7.4000e- 004 0.0678 0.0187 6.8000e- 004 0.0194 103.1621 103.1621 2.3500e- 003 103.2210 Total 0.0434 0.0266 0.3025 1.0300e- 003 0.0671 7.4000e- 004 0.0678 0.0187 6.8000e- 004 0.0194 103.1621 103.1621 2.3500e- 003 103.2210 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Total 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 13 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0234 0.7290 0.2110 1.7000e- 003 0.0447 3.8700e- 003 0.0486 0.0129 3.7000e- 003 0.0166 185.1262 185.1262 0.0161 185.5293 Worker 0.1433 0.0878 0.9984 3.4100e- 003 0.3689 2.4400e- 003 0.3713 0.0978 2.2500e- 003 0.1001 340.4350 340.4350 7.7700e- 003 340.6292 Total 0.1667 0.8168 1.2093 5.1100e- 003 0.4136 6.3100e- 003 0.4199 0.1107 5.9500e- 003 0.1166 525.5612 525.5612 0.0239 526.1585 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 0.0000 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Total 1.3686 12.4212 11.4575 0.0180 0.6754 0.6754 0.6283 0.6283 0.0000 1,701.594 7 1,701.594 7 0.5139 1,714.442 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 14 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0234 0.7290 0.2110 1.7000e- 003 0.0300 3.8700e- 003 0.0339 9.2700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 0.0130 185.1262 185.1262 0.0161 185.5293 Worker 0.1433 0.0878 0.9984 3.4100e- 003 0.2214 2.4400e- 003 0.2238 0.0616 2.2500e- 003 0.0639 340.4350 340.4350 7.7700e- 003 340.6292 Total 0.1667 0.8168 1.2093 5.1100e- 003 0.2514 6.3100e- 003 0.2577 0.0709 5.9500e- 003 0.0768 525.5612 525.5612 0.0239 526.1585 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Total 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 15 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0196 0.6552 0.1954 1.6800e- 003 0.0447 1.4200e- 003 0.0461 0.0129 1.3500e- 003 0.0142 183.5323 183.5323 0.0155 183.9192 Worker 0.1349 0.0792 0.9249 3.2900e- 003 0.3689 2.3900e- 003 0.3713 0.0978 2.2000e- 003 0.1000 328.6246 328.6246 7.0400e- 003 328.8006 Total 0.1545 0.7343 1.1203 4.9700e- 003 0.4136 3.8100e- 003 0.4174 0.1107 3.5500e- 003 0.1142 512.1569 512.1569 0.0225 512.7197 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 0.0000 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Total 1.2388 11.3833 11.3050 0.0180 0.5886 0.5886 0.5474 0.5474 0.0000 1,701.489 5 1,701.489 5 0.5102 1,714.244 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 16 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0196 0.6552 0.1954 1.6800e- 003 0.0300 1.4200e- 003 0.0315 9.2700e- 003 1.3500e- 003 0.0106 183.5323 183.5323 0.0155 183.9192 Worker 0.1349 0.0792 0.9249 3.2900e- 003 0.2214 2.3900e- 003 0.2237 0.0616 2.2000e- 003 0.0638 328.6246 328.6246 7.0400e- 003 328.8006 Total 0.1545 0.7343 1.1203 4.9700e- 003 0.2514 3.8100e- 003 0.2552 0.0709 3.5500e- 003 0.0744 512.1569 512.1569 0.0225 512.7197 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.1819 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2919 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Total 0.4738 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 17 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0286 0.0168 0.1962 7.0000e- 004 0.0782 5.1000e- 004 0.0788 0.0208 4.7000e- 004 0.0212 69.7083 69.7083 1.4900e- 003 69.7456 Total 0.0286 0.0168 0.1962 7.0000e- 004 0.0782 5.1000e- 004 0.0788 0.0208 4.7000e- 004 0.0212 69.7083 69.7083 1.4900e- 003 69.7456 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.1819 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2919 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Total 0.4738 2.0358 2.4234 3.9600e- 003 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.1255 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0258 375.9079 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 18 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0286 0.0168 0.1962 7.0000e- 004 0.0470 5.1000e- 004 0.0475 0.0131 4.7000e- 004 0.0135 69.7083 69.7083 1.4900e- 003 69.7456 Total 0.0286 0.0168 0.1962 7.0000e- 004 0.0470 5.1000e- 004 0.0475 0.0131 4.7000e- 004 0.0135 69.7083 69.7083 1.4900e- 003 69.7456 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 19 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.2434 1.0449 3.3996 0.0131 1.2167 9.7500e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0800e- 003 0.3345 1,328.504 4 1,328.504 4 0.0553 1,329.885 8 Unmitigated 0.2434 1.0449 3.3996 0.0131 1.2167 9.7500e- 003 1.2265 0.3254 9.0800e- 003 0.3345 1,328.504 4 1,328.504 4 0.0553 1,329.885 8 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Congregate Care (Assisted Living)149.12 149.12 149.12 573,628 573,628 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 149.12 149.12 149.12 573,628 573,628 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.00 19.00 41.00 100 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966 Parking Lot 0.558976 0.043534 0.209821 0.113949 0.016111 0.005791 0.025447 0.016654 0.001713 0.001553 0.004896 0.000590 0.000966 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 20 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 21 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 1001.86 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Congregate Care (Assisted Living) 1.00186 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0108 0.0923 0.0393 5.9000e- 004 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 7.4600e- 003 117.8658 117.8658 2.2600e- 003 2.1600e- 003 118.5662 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 22 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Unmitigated 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 1.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 9.3900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0803 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 4.8723 Total 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 23 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 1.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 9.3900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0803 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 4.8723 Total 0.0916 0.0306 2.6473 1.4000e- 004 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 4.7570 4.7570 4.6200e- 003 0.0000 4.8723 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 24 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/29/2019 9:57 PMPage 25 of 25 Park Plaza Memory Care - Future - Orange County, Winter APPENDIX B • Arborist Report • Arborist Site Plan with Trees Protected Tree Report February 25, 2019 Report Prepared on Behalf of: Mr. Axel Guerra Kisco Senior Living 5790 Fleet Street Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Location: 574 S Glassell St, Orange CA. 92866 Prepared by: Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Michael Green Registered Consulting Arborist No.: 602 Certified Arborist No.: WE9464A 5670 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1800 Los Angeles, CA 90036 310.913.5203 © 2019 Evergreen Arborists Consultants. All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.............................…………….............…………............…………………....3 2.0 Background and Project Description ...................................................................................3 3.0 Observations and Summary .................................................................................................4 4.0 Summary Statement .............................................................................................................4 Matrix of Trees, Table 1 ......................................................................................................5 5.0 Tree Preservation Guidelines ...............................................................................................6 6.0 Tree Protection Measures ....................................................................................................6 7.0 Conclusions ..........................................................................................................................9 8.0 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................10 9.0 Definitions..........................................................................................................................12 Attachments Attachment A - Aerial Image .........................................................................................................19 Attachment B - Site Plan................................................................................................................20 Attachment C - Site Photos ............................................................................................................21 Attachment D - Road Building over Tree Root Zone ....................................................................25 Report Writer .................................................................................................................................27 Assumptions and Limitations ........................................................................................................28 3 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 1.0 Introduction This arborist report discusses the impact of the proposed construction of a multi-unit senior living facility at 574 S. Glassell Street and a replacement driveway near two offsite trees on an adjacent property located at 2629 E. Chapman, Orange, CA. The subject property has two silk oak trees in the front entrance driveway. Two adjacent offsite trees with large canopies overhang the subject property: one Moreton bay fig and one Aleppo pine (see Matrix of Trees). The two silk oak trees are proposed for removal due to the construction of the driveway for the project. The two adjacent offsite trees, a Moreton bay fig and an Aleppo pine, are to be preserved and protected throughout the duration of the project. Purpose and Use of Report Kisco Senior Living engaged the services of Evergreen Arborist Consultants (EAC) to evaluate four trees and prepare a report. This report presents my observations and opinions concerning the four subject trees. Information in this report is limited to the condition of the trees during my inspection on January 21, 2019. The report is to be used by Kisco Senior Living at their discretion. Limits of Agreement The examination of the trees is based on my visual inspection. My site examination and the information in this report is limited to the date, time and condition of the trees at the time of my inspection. My examination is not considered as a tree risk assessment, and emphasizes tree preservation during development. This report is not intended as and does not represent legal advice and should not be relied upon to take the place of such advice. All measurements are approximate. 2.0 Background and Project Description The property is located on one parcel in a mixed commercial and residential neighborhood zone. The site use consists of an existing restaurant building and parking lot. The topography of the site is flat. The proposed new building and driveway were not under construction at the time of my inspection. Four trees were inventoried, two silk oak trees, one Moreton bay fig and one Aleppo pine tree as depicted on the attached Site Plan and shown with tree I.D. numbers. Onsite silk oak trees #3 and #4 are proposed for removal due to the construction of the new driveway for the project. 4 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. 3.0 Observations & Summary Each listed tree is assigned “Good,” “Fair,” “Poor” or “Dead/Dying” condition rating as a means to cumulatively measure their physiological health, structural integrity, anticipated life span, location, size, and specie type. A description of these ratings with the assigned tree numbers are presented below. Good: These trees appear in overall good health, seem structurally stable, and have a high potential of providing long-term contribution to the site. They are the most suitable for retention and protection. Applies to tree #1. Fair: These trees require frequent care throughout their remaining life span and provide less significance to the site than those assigned a high suitability. They may be worthy of retention, but not at the expense of significant design revisions. Applies to trees #2, #3 and #4. Poor: These trees are predisposed to irreparable health and structural problems that are expected to worsen regardless of measures employed. Low suitability for preservation or survival from development impacts suggest they are appropriate for removal and replacement with suitable landscape trees. Applies to no trees. Dead or dying: Applies to no trees. 4.0 Summary Statement If all the EAC recommendations are implemented, including two Special Treatment Areas for the driveway design; and the City of Orange tree ordinance regulations are followed, the trees proposed for retention (see Matrix of Trees) would be reasonably preserved and protected. Therefore, significant detrimental impacts to the protected trees including the historic Morton Bay Fig, would be avoided. 5 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Matrix of Trees, Table 1 Plans shall delineate TPZ fencing according to Table 1 dimensions. Trees #1 and #2 – install Type I chain link fencing to provide protection during the all construction step phases. Relocation or entry requires coordination with project arborist. Tree Tag Tree Species Condition DBH - Inches Height - Feet Canopy Width - Feet Suitability for Preservation Fencing Type Tree Fencing Dimensions Recommendation Notes 1 Moreton Bay Fig Ficus macrophylla Good 12.5 ft 80'150' x 142'High Type I 15' outside dripeline of tree Protect 2 Aleppo Pine Pinus halepensis Fair 21"25'30' x 34'High Type I 10' outside dripeline of tree Protect Browning on needles 3 Silk Oak Tree Grevillea robusta Fair 45"90'30' x 32'Low NA NA Remove 4 Silk Oak Tree Grevillea robusta Fair 34"90'34' x 32'Low NA NA Remove 6 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 5.0 Tree Preservation Guidelines The proposed trees designated for protection (see Matrix of Trees) must be protected by the contractors in the TPZ. The trees listed in this report under “preserve” are suitable for preservation and have the potential for longevity at the site. The trees proposed for retention are rated for suitability for preservation based upon age, health, structural condition, and ability to safely coexist within a development environment. If all my recommendations are implemented, including two Special Treatment Areas for driveway’s design materials; and the City of Orange tree ordinance regulations are followed, the trees proposed for retention (see Matrix of Trees) would be reasonably preserved and protected. Significant detrimental impact to the protected trees would be avoided. Construction activities near trees may have long-term effects on trees. Trees vary in their ability to adapt to altered growing conditions. Mature trees can have established stable biological systems in the pre-existing physical environment. Disruption of this environment by construction activities interrupts the tree’s physiological processes causing depletion of energy reserves and a decline in vigor, which may result in a tree’s death. Typically, this reaction develops between one to five years, but symptoms may not show for many years after injurious disruption. The tree protection regulations are intended to guide a construction project to ensure that appropriate design and best practices will be implemented in the field to eliminate undesirable consequences that may result from uninformed or careless acts, and preserve both trees and property values. The Best Management Practices (BMP) are designed to preserve and protect tree health by avoiding damage to tree roots, trunk, or crown. Site development and detailed planning conditions are important components to avoid disturbance within the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) for all trees designated for protection. Tree protection provides for the physical protective barriers to control site disturbances and activities such as grading, demolition, building, hardscape and landscape construction, infrastructure and utility installation, maintenance, or other changes. Any of these impacts can affect the structural integrity, stability and vigor of protected trees. 6.0 Tree Protection Measures The recommended Tree Protection Measures presented within this section serve as general design guidelines to help mitigate or avoid tree injury to remain consistent with the City goals, policy and ordinance requirements. The measures listed are intended to be utilized as Conditions of Approval by the approving review body. They are subject to revision upon any changes to the project plans reviewed and the Project Arborist must be consulted in the event any measure cannot be feasibly implemented. Please note any referenced distances from trunks are intended 7 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. from the closest edge (face) of their outermost perimeter at soil grade. At a minimum, a Type I chain link fencing should also be installed 15-feet outside the dripline of tree #1 and 10-feet outside the dripline of tree #2. 5.1 Design Guidelines—Site, Grading & Improvements 1. In the TPZ, all trenching, soil scraping, compaction, mass grading, finish-grading, over excavation, sub excavation, swales, bio swales, storm drains, equipment cleaning, stockpiling/dumping of materials, and equipment operation shall be avoided. Where an impact encroaches slightly within a setback, it can be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the Project Arborist to determine appropriate mitigation measures. 2. All existing unused lines, pipes, and vaults within the TPZ should be abandoned and cut off at existing grade rather than being dug up and causing subsequent root damage. 3. The permanent and temporary drainage design, including downspouts, should not require water being discharged within the TPZ. The drainage should not require trenching for storm drains or swales within the TPZ. 4. Underground utilities and services should be routed beyond the TPZ. 5. The future staging area and route(s) of access should not be in TPZ. 6. Restrict spoils and runoff from traveling into root zones, the future erosion control design should establish any silt fencing or straw wattles away from the tree’s trunk (not against it) and as close to the canopy’s edge as possible. 5.2 Design Guidelines--Proposed Landscape Design 7. Plant material installed beneath the canopies of the protected trees, if applicable, must be appropriate and planted at least 3 feet from the trunk. 8. Irrigation should not spray the trunk. 9. Irrigation, valves, and lighting features should be placed so that no trenching occurs within the TPZ. 10. New property fencing and fence posts should be placed at least 2 feet from the tree trunk. 11. Groundcover beneath the canopy should be comprised of a 5” layer of wood chips or other high-quality mulch. Keep mulch at least 6 inches from trunk. 8 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. 12. Tilling, ripping, and compaction within the TPZ should be avoided. 13. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopy should be placed at existing grade. 14. Roots with diameters of 2 inches or greater should not be damaged or cut without prior assessment of the Project Arborist. All tools shall be sanitized in between cuts. Materials commonly used to sterilize tools include bleach (10 percent solution) or Lysol. An hourly rate shall be charged for these inspections. 5.3 During Demolition and Construction 1. Tree trunks shall not be used as winch supports for moving or lifting heavy loads. 2. The removal of existing features within the TPZ must be carefully performed to avoid excavating into root zones. 3. Roots with diameters of 2 inches or greater should not be damaged or cut without prior assessment of the Project Arborist. All tools shall be sanitized in between cuts. Materials commonly used to sterilize tools include bleach (10 percent solution) or Lysol. An hourly rate shall be charged for these inspections. 4. Supplemental water will be needed to help mitigate root loss/disturbance. 5. Spoils created during digging shall not be piled or spread on unpaved ground within the TPZ. 6. Digging holes for fence posts within the TPZ should be manually performed. In the event a root of 2 inches or greater in diameter is encountered, the process should be shifted over by 12 inches and the process repeated. 7. Great care must be taken by equipment operators to position their equipment to avoid the trunks of protected trees. The Project Arborist can be consulted to provide a feasible solution if needed. 8. Dust accumulating on trunks and canopies during dry weather periods and should be periodically washed away every 3 to 4 months. Dust accumulating on trunks and canopies after grading should also be washed at the completion of the grading. 9. The disposal of harmful products is prohibited beneath the canopies. Herbicide should not be used within a TPZ on site or should be labeled for safe use near trees. 9 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. 5.4 Soil Compaction Soil compaction is a complex set of physical, chemical, and biological constraints on tree growth. Principal components leading to limited growth are the loss of aeration and pore space, poor gas exchange with the atmosphere, lack of available water, and mechanical impedance of root growth. Soil compaction is considered to be the largest single factor responsible for the decline of trees on construction sites. 5.5 Grading Limitations within the Tree Protection Zone 1. Lowering the grade around trees can have an immediate and long-term effect on trees. Typically, most roots are within the top 3 feet of soil, and most of the fine roots active in water and nutrient absorption are in the top 12 inches. 2. Grade changes within the TPZ are not permitted. Tilling, ripping, and compaction within the TPZ should be avoided. 3. Grade changes outside the TPZ shall not significantly alter drainage. 4. Grade changes under specifically approved circumstances shall not allow more than 6 inches of fill soil or allow more than 4 inches of existing soil to be removed from natural grade, unless mitigated. 5. Grade fills over 6 inches or impervious overlay shall incorporate an approved permanent aeration system, permeable material, or other approved mitigation. 6. Grade cuts exceeding 4 inches shall incorporate retaining walls or an appropriate transition equivalent. 7. Roots with diameters of 2 inches or greater should not be damaged or cut without prior assessment of the Project Arborist. All tools shall be sanitized in between cuts. Materials commonly used to sterilize tools include bleach (10 percent solution) or Lysol. An hourly rate shall be charged for these inspections. 7.0 Conclusions In my professional opinion, the project could proceed with minimal negative effect on protected trees #1 & #2, providing the following conditions are met and incorporated into the approved plan set: 10 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. 1. Trees #1 and #2, are to be preserved throughout the duration of the project. They should be preserved by using Type I chain link fencing underneath the canopy of the tree. It is estimated that 15% of the root zone underneath the canopy of the Moreton Bay Fig will be impacted by the proposed construction. The 15% percent was derived by taking the square footage of the proposed construction underneath the canopy (approximately 2,600 sq. ft.). and dividing it by tree canopy (approximately 19,500 sq. ft.). The impact should be less than significant if the construction adheres to this report. Trees #3 and #4 will be significantly impacted by the proposed construction of the new driveway for the project and are therefore not suitable for preservation. 8.0 Recommendations 1. Tree Protection Sheet. This report in its entirety shall be added to the approved building permit plan sets as a critical reference for contractor implementation. The contractor should be familiar with the specific instructions and responsibilities revolving around the trees to be protected. It is recommended that prior to commencement a professional arborist be retained to work with the contractor and his personnel during critical phases of the project. 2. Trees #3 and #4 will be significantly impacted by the proposed construction of the new driveway for the project, are not suitable for preservation and therefore are scheduled to be removed. 3. Trees #1and #2, will need to be preserved throughout the duration of the project. They should be preserved by using Type I chain link fencing underneath the canopy of the tree. 4. All pruning for trees #1 and #2, should be performed by a qualified tree trimmer and should be consistent with ANSI A300 Standards - Part I Pruning, and the most recent edition of the International Society of Arboriculture Best Management Practices for Tree Pruning and Utility Pruning of Trees. All pruning shall be monitored and supervised by a Registered Consulting Arborist from EAC. All tools shall be sanitized in between cuts when pruning the tree. Materials commonly used to sterilize tools include bleach (10 percent solution) or Lysol. 5. An hourly rate shall be charged for these inspections. All recommendations are at the client’s expense. 11 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. 8.1 Special Treatment Areas (STA) #1 & #2 (see Site Plan, Sheet A2.01) 6. Exposed roots at the site of trees #1 and #2, to remain and should be immediately covered with burlap, carpet remnants or other material and kept moist until top soil can be replaced. 7. Roots with diameters of 2-inches or greater should not be damaged or cut without prior assessment of the Project Arborist. An hourly rate shall be charged for these inspections. Roots should be flush-cut with hand pruners, hand loppers, and/or handsaw (as appropriate) for roots ½ inch or greater in diameter. All tools shall be sanitized in between cuts. Materials commonly used to sterilize tools include bleach (10 percent solution) or Lysol. 8. All underground utilities and services shall be rerouted outside the tree protection zone. 9. Basic design steps for new driveway shall be as follows. a. Remove existing asphalt and only a limited amount of existing base rock for releveling. Removal of should be performed by a jackhammer or comparable tool to break material into small enough pieces to be removed by hand. b. Specify limits to rock, soil & root removal from historic trees. Set the grading elevation specifically beforehand (not at building permit). i. We recommend “pot holes” (two to three holes, approximately 18 x 18- inches wide) per STA area to determine root depth. ii. Tip. Leave as much existing rock as possible to avoid excess root removal. c. Lay Geogrid (follow manufacturer recommendations), new layer of base rock (depth per Engineer) and pervious surface above the newly established base. d. Pervious driving surfaces over the historic tree roots should be low impact. Consider the following materials: i. pervious asphalt, pervious concrete (ground or coarse), pervious pavers (color stained SF-Rima stone, ceramic or equiv.) ii. Note: Overall finished grade. The engineered strength required for each of these materials can impose a different thickness (height) to the overall finished surface. It is a priority to select the material early in design for this elevation element. The remainder of the site would be based off this level for water management and driving surfaces. 10. If additional site inspections by the Project Arborist are required, an hourly rate is charged. 11. Fenced enclosures should be erected around all trees to be protected to keep crowns and branching structure clear from contact by equipment, materials, and activities; preserve 12 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. roots and soil condition in an intact and non-compacted state; and identify the Tree Protection Zone in which no soil disturbance is permitted and activities are restricted, unless otherwise approved by the Project Arborist. 12. A ‘Warning’ sign should be prominently displayed on each protective enclosure. The sign will be a minimum of 8.5 inches x 11 inches and clearly state the following: 13. A Type I Chain Link Tree Protection Fence should be preserved throughout the duration of the project. The fences should enclose the area under the canopy drip line or TPZ. 9.0 Definitions 1. Basal flair or root crown means the tree trunk where it emerges from the root system and flairs out to create the base of the tree. 2. Canopy means the area of a tree that consists primarily of branches and leaves. 3. Drip line means the outermost area of the tree canopy (leafy area of tree). 4. Root Protection Zone means the area within a circle with a radius equal to the greatest distance from the trunk to any overhanging foliage in the tree canopy. 5. Diameter at Standard Height (DSH) means the diameter of the perimeter tree trunk at 4.5 feet (or 54 inches) above natural grade level. The diameter may be calculated by using the following formula: DSH = circumference at 4.5 feet x 3.142 (D=C x Pi). The City of Orange Tree Ordinance uses this trunk sizing formula. 6. Disturbance refers to all of the various activities from construction, improvements or landscaping that may damage trees. 7. Drip line area means the area within X distance from the trunk of a tree, measured from the perimeter of the trunk of the tree at 54 inches above natural grade, where X equals a distance ten times the diameter of the trunk at 54 inches above natural grade. 8. Pruning Restrictions. To preserve the natural character of the historic Morton Bay Fig #1, some limited crown raising on the project side may be required to achieve 14’ vertical clearance but yet allow naturally growing branches to extend over the property line, new 13 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. parking and drive isle. Cutting vertically at property line would negatively alter the tree’s intrinsic character and is not advised. Excessive Pruning may also mean: removing in excess, one-fourth (25 percent) or greater, of the functioning leaf, stem or root area. Pruning in excess of 25 percent is injurious to the tree and is a prohibited act. Excessive pruning typically results in the tree appearing as a ‘bonsai’, ‘lion’s-tailed’, ‘lolly-popped’, overly thinned or unbalanced. 9. Root pruning may include the cutting of any root 2 inches or greater in diameter and/or severing in excess of 25 percent of the roots. Roots can only be pruned outside the drip line. 10. Structural defect means any structural weakness or deformity of a tree or its parts. A tree with a structural defect can be verified to be hazardous by a certified arborist. 14 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Fencing Required fencing should not be removed until completion of project. The fence should enclose the area under the canopy drip line or TPZ of the tree to be saved throughout the life of the project, or until final improvement work within the area is required, typically near the end of the project. Tree fencing should be erected before demolition, grading or construction begins. Contact the Project Arborist for timing of TPZ alteration, access or removal. WARNING SIGN POSTED TO FENCING This warning sign shall be posted to the fencing. A warning sign shall be prominently displayed on the fence. The sign shall be a minimum of 8.5 x 11 inches and clearly state: WARNING - Tree Protection Zone - This fence shall not be removed according to the City of Orange. For illustration purposes only This fence shall not be removed according to City of Orange. 15 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Type I Tree Protection Fencing encloses a partial area of the canopy dripline. The fencing shall enclose the area under the canopy to be saved throughout the life of the project, or until final improvement work within the area is required, typically near the end of the project. Contractor is responsible for protecting roots. For illustration purposes only. 16 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Tree photo not taken from current site. For illustration purposes only. Example of Type I Chain link fencing underneath the dripline of tree canopy. For illustration purposes only 17 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. USE OF HERBICIDE IS NOT ALLOWED WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE TREE'S DRIPLINE. No Dumping Allowed Around the Protected Tree. Prohibited activities are: Storage or parking vehicles, building materials, refuse, excavated materials spoils or dumping of poisonous materials on or around trees and roots. Poisonous materials include, but are not limited to, paint, petroleum products, concrete or stucco mix, dirty water or any other material which may be deleterious to tree health. 18 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Figure 1. Recommended pruning cut example. When removing a branch, always cut outside the branch bark ridge and collar. Do not make a flush cut adjacent to the trunk of the tree or branch being pruned. A. Make a partial cut from beneath, at a point several inches away from the trunk. B. Make a second cut from above several inches out from the first cut, to allow the limb to fall safely. C. Complete the job with a final cut just outside the branch collar, the raised area that surrounds the branch where it joins the trunk. WOUNDS TO THE TRUNK AND LIMBS CAUSED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE TREATED as stated above. TREE TOPPING: It shall be unlawful for any person to top any tree without a tree permit approved by the Project Arborist. If the Project Arborist determines that crown reduction of the tree is necessary because the tree has been severely damaged by storms or other causes, or is in circumstance which makes other pruning practices impractical, the Project Arborist may issue a tree permit allowing topping of the tree. 19 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Attachment A – Aerial Image Figure 2. Google Aerial. Subject trees outlined in red. 20 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Attachment B – Site Plan 21 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Attachment C – Site Photos Tree #1 #1 22 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Tree #1. Tree protection zone to extend 15-feet beyond the dripline of the tree canopy. Biaxial Geogrid material to be used for new driveway. Tree Dripline 23 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Tree #2. Tree protection zone to extend 15-feet beyond the dripline of the tree canopy. Biaxial Geogrid material to be used for new driveway. #2 Tree Dripline Tree Dripline 24 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Trees #3 and #4 #3 #4 25 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Attachment D – Road Building over Tree Root Zone 26 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. 27 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Report Prepared by: Michael Green This arborist report is prepared by Michael Green. He has over 15 years of experience in the landscape industry. His background includes hands-on experience in tree care, plant health care, landscape maintenance, landscape construction, and irrigation design and water management. His experience in the landscape industry makes him an excellent choice for preserving trees during construction. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in agribusiness from California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. Certifications, Licenses, and Professional Associations Registered Consulting Arborist No.: 602, American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA) Certified Arborist, International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Irrigation Auditor (IA) Licensed California Landscape Contractor (C-27) California Licensed Pesticide Applicator, (QAL) Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (ISA) Ruben Green, contributing He is president of Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc. with more than 33 years of experience in the landscape industry. His background includes hands-on experience in tree care, landscape maintenance, construction, and irrigation management. He has a Master’s degree in plant science from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He provides detailed investigations, independent analysis, and expert witness testimony since 2003. He is a Registered Consulting Arborist with the American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA), a certified arborist and a certified tree risk assessor with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), licensed pesticide applicator (QAL) with the state of California, and a (C-27) licensed California contractor. 28 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Assumptions and Limitations My field methods are evaluated with a 100 percent ground visual survey. No climbing, excavating, coring, boring, sounding of the trunk, or drilling was performed. Trees that require an additional inspection for risk and hazard evaluation beyond the visual ground inspection will be billed under a separate proposal. All inspections are visual ground inspections and are not considered as a risk inspection. No digging, root collar excavation, drilling, coring, or climbing was performed. A risk assessment includes but not be limited to a root collar excavation, climbing the tree, and further examining the upper side of branches and upper trunk and stems. My site examination and the information in this report are limited to the date and time the inspection occurred. The information in this report was limited to the condition of the trees during my inspection. Additional inspection(s) require a separate agreement between both parties in writing. Site inspections only provide a “snapshot” of the tree. Changes in environmental conditions such as but not limited to construction, surrounding site changes, flooding, root damage, fires, pruning practices, lack of maintenance, grade changes, and wind can impact the tree’s conditions, structure, safety, risk factor, and health, etc. A consulting arborist cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and/or below ground under the tree. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatment does not guarantee outcome or results. The web provides numerous tree risk assessment sites that offer tips for tree care and detecting and/or identifying potential tree hazards. If the client believes the tree’s condition has changed since the date of this inspection, the arborist should be contacted ASAP. Future inspections, canopy inspections, and root collar examinations are under the client’s discretion. Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc., its employees, or related companies, makes no guaranties, express or implied to the tree’s health, risk, hazard, condition, potential for failure or future condition. Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc., its employees shall not be liable to client/owner or any other party(s) for loss of property, loss of life, loss of use, loss of profits or income(s), special damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, incidental damages, or damages arising from the failure of inspection(s) or weather conditions. This report is not valid until paid in full. The Client acknowledges and agrees that all intellectual property rights and title, including without limitation, all copyright in this Assessment shall remain solely with Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. Possession of this Assessment, or a copy thereof, does not entitle the Client or any third party to the right of publication or reproduction of the Assessment for any purpose save and except where Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. has given its prior written consent. The client shall hold this arborist harmless against any and all claims for injuries to persons or property on the premises. 29 574 S Glassell St Orange CA. 92866 Evergreen Arborist Consultants, Inc. A consulting arborist is a tree specialist who uses their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist or seek additional advice. Any treatment(s), such as pruning and removal of trees, but not limited to, property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, landlord-tenant matters, etc. are beyond the scope of this work. This arborist relies and accepts information from his client to be complete and accurate. The client hiring this arborist accepts full responsibility for authorizing the recommended treatment(s) or remedial measure(s) and holds this arborist harmless. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near a tree is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks is to eliminate all trees. . APPENDIX C • Historic Resources Report • Archaeological Resources Letter Prepared for: Zion Enterprises 1044 Calle Recodo, Suite A San Clemente, CA 92673 Prepared by: May 16, 2016 574 S. GLASSELL ST. ORANGE, CALIF. HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 1 INTRODUCTION Zion Enterprises has requested this Historic Resources Evaluation to determine the historical significance of the restaurant property at 574 S. Glassell St. in the City of Orange. To complete our evaluation, ARG made a site visit to inspect and photograph the exteriors and surroundings of the property; conducted research into building permits and other City records to establish dates of construction and alterations; consulted books about the popular culture and design of the period and the architectural type; searched on‐line sources that usually contain information and discussions for resources comparable to the subject property; and applied criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources to determine whether the property should be considered a historical resource. A description of the property and its history is included below, with an evaluation of its historical significance. This evaluation was prepared by Jennifer Trotoux, Associate, Andrew Goodrich, and Mickie Torres‐Gil, all Architectural Historians and Historic Preservation Planners with ARG in Pasadena. Katie Horak provided oversight as Principal in Charge. The project manager, Jennifer Trotoux, has been with ARG for nine years and has twenty years of experience in the evaluation of historic resources in Southern California. All ARG staff meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in History and Architectural History. As a result of this study, ARG found that the property lacks the historic integrity that would allow it to communicate more about the period of its construction or about its original use as a mid‐century family restaurant connected to a recreational venue. This is apparently due to alterations, though the record with the city is scant. Therefore, it is not considered historically significant and is not a historical resource for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Location Map: The subject property is indicated by the red star at 574 S Glassell St., north of the 22 (Garden Grove) Freeway and northwest of Hart Park. (Image source: USGS Quad Map, Orange). NORTH 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 2 Vicinity Aerial Image: Satellite view of the subject property (in red) and its surroundings. Apartment building to the south was the location of the golf course referenced in the property history. (Image source: Google Maps) NORTH 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 3 ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION The property consists of a restaurant building with a landscaped setback to the east (along S. Glassell St.) and an adjacent parking lot to the rear (west). A driveway along the north side provides access to the rear parking lot. The building is set at an angle to the street, with its south corner lying very close to the south property line. A large three‐story apartment building lies to the south of the subject property, on the former site of a miniature golf course with which the restaurant building was formerly associated. The property of Holy Family Cathedral and school lies north of the subject property. The restaurant is one and one and a half stories in height. Its massing consists of a large gabled A‐frame roof clad in composition shingle, and an adjacent one‐story, flat‐roofed wing to the north. Four large rafters of the gable extend to the ground, past the edge of the eaves, on the landscaped front side of the building. A band of windows is located along this south side beneath the eaves. The entrance is within the gable front, sheltered by a trellis with raking supports. This feature continues across the façade, along with a planter at the building’s base, interrupted in the second bay by a perpendicular flagstone‐clad wall that frames a planter at the entrance. These appear to be original features that carried the Tiki theme of the dining and recreation complex. The exterior of the building is finished in stucco. The gable end contains double doors offset to the left with a wood trim piece continuing the line of the lintel across the wall. Similar trim frames the window above and divides the façade into thinly framed panels. A centered second‐floor window is inset from this façade, with a lattice of wood slats passing in front of it, two vertical pairs and two horizontal pairs that cross near the outer edges of the opening. Horizontal wood slats form a gable‐end vent that fills the upper triangle of the gable end above the window. The divisions of the window opening extend into this portion of the façade. The rear of the building is largely windowless and utilitarian. A lean‐to on the rear of the building was the location of rentals to serve the adjacent miniature golf course. The openings here still retain bamboo trim associated with the Tiki theme of the course. The landscape design is limited to lawn and shaped hedges that fill the spaces between the extended rafters and cover the lower portion of the south‐facing side windows. Smaller, recent plantings fill the areas adjacent to the entrance. A pair of large silk oak trees grow in a low, lava‐rock‐clad planter in the front of the driveway. The trees may pre‐date the restaurant. Character‐defining features that associate the property with its 1962 origins include: A‐frame roof/massing, siting of the building in an angular position relative to the street, lava rock and Palos Verdes stone planters and wall cladding, front trellis, and small areas of bamboo trim remaining on the rear doorways (which faced the golf course). Alterations While we were able to locate memorabilia associated with the restaurant and golf course, we did not locate any early photos of the restaurant itself. Research with the City of Orange also revealed very little in the permit files that would indicate what changes were made to the building over time. Knowing that the restaurant (and to a greater extent, the golf course) was originally Tiki themed, we were able to identify limited areas with features such as bamboo trim (on the rear where the golf course rentals took place) that likely contributed to its early appearance. However, there was very little such material remaining on the façade. This leads us to conclude that either 1) the building had an interesting A‐frame and wing profile in its original incarnation but lacked much thematic elaboration or 2) nearly all of the 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 4 building’s thematic decoration has been removed over the years. It is unclear which is the case, but the building is not Tiki‐themed today. A few minor alterations are known to have taken place in recent years according to our review of earlier Google Street View images (2008‐2015). The extended “Tiki torches” attached to the front trellis were removed between April 2014 and March 2015, with the beams that they were attached to cut down to the top of the trellis. The windows to the right of the entrance were removed and filled in and the front doors replaced in mid‐2015. Any earlier alterations are difficult to determine, since the only early image of the front of the building known to us is the illustration that appeared on a matchbook (see p. 7). This image does not seem to have reflected the actual appearance of the building, but rather the idea behind the building’s design and/or the restaurant’s theme. The building is depicted as a Tiki‐style A‐frame, with lava rock at the base, freestanding torches in the front, and vertical wood siding throughout the upper part of the “A.” It appears that the stucco may be original. The stickwork in the gable‐end vent or window over the entrance may also be original; it was in place as early as 2008 prior to the other alterations. With so little information available in the permit record, and no earlier architectural drawings or photographs to refer to, the original appearance of the building cannot conclusively be determined. The following known alterations are summarized with the approximate dates they occurred. The earliest photo image of the primary façade that we were able to locate was from 2008. It is not known what alterations may have occurred prior to that. Many of these alterations are quite minor. They are, however, the only ones that we are able to identify with the available information. Other alterations may have taken place prior to those we are aware of, and this may also help to explain why the property, aside from the distinctive A‐frame shape that it retains, is compromised in its ability to convey its significance. Refer also to the discussion of historic integrity below (pp. 13‐14). ALTERATION DATE RANGE OF ALTERATION Front door replaced Between May 2014 and March 2015 Infilled windows on main façade Between May 2014 and March 2015 Torches removed Between May 2014 and March 2015 Outriggers in gable end cut Between May 2014 and March 2015 Mechanical screen added Unknown; reversible and not a significant alteration Signs changed Most recently in 1988 Golf course and associated landscape removed/new building constructed on adjacent site Major change to setting. Stone planter at entrance painted Between May 2014 and March 2015; not a significant alteration. 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 5 574 S. GLASSELL ST. View north on Glassell St. of setting; building at left. Moreton Bay Fig Tree on neighboring property (ARG, Nov. 2015). View west of subject property (ARG, Nov. 2015). View southwest of primary façade (ARG, Nov. 2015). Landscaped setback and signage (ARG, Nov. 2015). Main gable and entrance, view west (ARG, Nov. 2015). Detail of main entrance area, view southwest (ARG, Nov. 2015). 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 6 North façade from driveway, view south (ARG, Nov. 2015). Rear façade, view south (ARG, Nov. 2015). Rear/south façade. Doors on rear portion of building were the location of sales and rental for the miniature golf course (ARG, Nov. 2015). Parking lot, view east (ARG, Nov. 2015). Comparison between May 2014 appearance (above left) and minor alterations (above right) completed prior to March 2015. Replaced front doors, removed windows to right of door, and removed torches. (2012 Image source: Google Street View, May 2014) 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 7 HISTORIC CONTEXT AND PROPERTY HISTORY The subject property is a restaurant that was originally connected to a miniature golf course on the adjacent land to the south. The property is located on S. Glassell St., which leads directly south from the Plaza that was the geographic and commercial heart of the town of Orange (incorporated in 1888). Just ten years prior to its construction, the subject property had been a part of an orange grove. Typical of the patterns of older Orange County towns, Orange began to increase greatly in land area as unincorporated agricultural property was annexed to the city following World War II (and soon after developed for residences and businesses). The population also burgeoned, doubling between 1950 and 1960 just prior to the development of the subject property. Changes in the local landscape and population were addressed by the City with the establishment of a new library in 1961 and a low‐scale, Modernist Civic Center not far from the historic Plaza in 1963. By the late 1960s, Glassell Street led directly to the new Garden Grove Freeway’s (State Route 22) access ramps, placing the property on an important thoroughfare. The subject property was constructed in 1962 and was known as Kim’s Family Restaurant. While no building permits were available, we did locate site plans for the restaurant, a roof plan, and drawings for the freestanding sign with the City of Orange. These documents were only available for viewing on a computer screen and had very poor resolution, limiting the amount of information that they could supply. The architect of the building was William E. Swank and Associates of Orange. The owner’s name in the title block of an early drawing is only partially legible (“M. Papa(?)rus”). The date in the title block is not legible. For the building itself, a ground floor plan and a site plan appear to be the only architectural plans available in city records. Three sign drawings were found in city records. The earliest on file dates to 1962, completed by Santa Ana Neon Co. for Kim’s Family Restaurant. The pole sign has two posts that lean in towards each other at the top, echoing the A‐frame of the roof. The design of the main body of the sign is not fully depicted. Below it is a shaped horizontal figure spanning the poles, and below that a narrow rectangular box that presumably carried a lettered message. As an indication of changes in the City of Orange, the approval for the original sign of the restaurant notes that there was some disagreement among commissioners. The motion was approved “subject to no moving or flashing parts,” while a Commissioner Murphy dissented and noted that “flashing parts might be appropriate in certain areas” of the city. The date on the second sign drawing is difficult to read but appears to be 1965. This drawing, for another early sign by Luminart Neon Co. of Whittier, shows a design for “Mr. K Restaurant” with “Buffeteria” spelled out at the top of the lower, changeable‐lettering portion of the sign. Following the pole sign typology of the period, a larger upper panel contains the business name in a distinctive design, while a smaller panel below it, accommodating changeable letters for more timely messages to be read at a closer distance, sits below it. A tapered pole terminates in a high spike above the upper panel. The original signs were approved prior to 1988. Drawings for the current sign (then for Home Cafeteria Chinese Food) are also present in city records and were approved in 1988. The plastic face of the main box of this sign has since been changed out for a different business. The senior housing apartment building adjacent to the south, which replaced the golf course, received its entitlements in 1985, and the golf course was removed by 1986. 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 8 Graphics from the original Kim’s family restaurant and adjacent miniature golf course. (Image source: user “BigBroTiki,” posted Dec. 28, 2008 to Tiki Central discussion forum, www.tikiroom.com) Graphics from the adjacent miniature golf course, Holo Wai. Rear of restaurant A‐frame is seen at left. (Image source: Kent Kanouse, posted Dec. 28, 2008 to Tiki Central discussion forum, www.tikiroom.com) Early aerial view (1963)of the original extent of the property showing relationship between the restaurant (at an angle at upper right) and the adjacent Holo Wai Miniature Golf Course that provided its original setting (www.historicaerials.com). Compare with aerial map showing vicinity on page 2. 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 9 Two 1967 views of the Holo Wai miniature golf course. Restaurant not pictured. (Image source: Kent Kanouse via Flickr) Historic Contexts: Mid‐Century Family Recreation Miniature golf courses were popular sites for family entertainment and recreation in post‐war Orange County. Golf was for many years an elitist sport requiring vast amounts of land for a course and ample leisure time to play. In the post‐war period, however, golf became popularized through television broadcasts and made more accessible through the increased availability of public courses. Miniature golf echoed the popularity of the real game, required much less time and resources, and made it available to a broad audience of all ages and income levels. In the newly developing suburban landscape of post‐war Orange County (of which the expanding City of Orange was a part), miniature golf was one of a number of increasingly popular and available recreational activities that were oriented toward teenagers and families. These activities also included indoor recreation such as bowling, ice skating, and roller skating, all of which filled a need for the Baby Boom generation, who were just reaching their teenaged years in the early 1960s. Casual family dining was also an important social activity of the period that had its own aesthetic. Orange County in the 1950s and 1960s had many themed restaurants, ranging from Swedish Smorgasbords such as the Villa Sweden to many examples of Tiki restaurants. The Tiki theme was a Polynesian fantasy style that was popularized after the return of soldiers from Hawaii and the South Pacific after World War II and the admission of Hawaii to U. S. statehood in 1959. It was particularly popular throughout Southern California, with many examples in Orange County. The Kona Hut in Laguna Beach (early 1950s), Sam’s Seafood in Sunset Beach (1960) were two examples. Even Disneyland followed suit with the Enchanted Tiki Room at Disneyland (1963). While Kim’s Family Restaurant (or at least the adjacent miniature golf course) appears to be remembered locally in Orange, it may not have been widely known. This serves to illustrate that there were likely numerous examples for local consumption that made the trend‐driven genre somewhat commonplace during the early 1960s. 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 10 Architect Steven Izenour, in his introduction to the 1985 book Googie: Fifties Coffee Shop Architecture, notes that when examining the recent past, “absolute aesthetic judgements of good and bad, high and low, are less important than a sure sense of time, place and meaning.” At their most evocative, 1960s themed restaurants were total environments. The atmosphere for a Tiki theme restaurant or bar was created by a synthesis of a grand entrance gesture (often an A‐frame) attached to an otherwise unremarkable building, with extensive amounts of custom‐made statuary and decorative elements (most in Southern California produced by the still‐active Oceanic Arts in Whittier). These could include stone or wood “Tiki” heads, water features, colored mood lighting, exotic plants, reeded matting covering the walls, bamboo trim, and ceramic lamps and drinkware. Nautical elements such as rope, life preservers, preserved or fake fish, fishing floats, and shells often played into the theme. It is not known whether Kim’s Family Restaurant had much, if any, of this type of décor. A period Tiki interior exhibiting the characteristics described above (Mauna Loa Restaurant, location unknown (restaurants from Manitoba to Mexico operated under this name). As historical themes, mid‐century recreation and dining are still a growing field of study. The Kahiki Supper Club in Columbus, Ohio was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1997 (demolished in 2000), as was the Mai‐Kai Restaurant in Fort Lauderdale, Florida in 2015. These especially significant examples were clearly indicative of trends in mid‐century American culture and were among the most expressive and intact examples. Most examples of the type appear to have disappeared with changing public tastes, escalating land values, and intensification of land use. The phenomenon is, however, well documented due to the engaging and plentiful printed graphics and photographic images available and the nostalgic chord that its strikes with those who grew up with it. For purposes of this particular study, it is sufficient to note that the subject property was associated with a theme of growing historical note. However, the sense of “time, place, and meaning” identified by Steven Izenour (above) is absent from this example. The extensive decoration that is associated with good examples in their original form gave life to the themes expressed by the businesses and the buildings, and there is little or none of that present in the 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 11 property today. The theme may have been carried out by the building, but we have little documentation of to what extent this may have been true. It is clear, however, that the building was set within, and not simply next door to, the golf course. The aerial views showing its siting with respect to the golf course make this clear, as does the photo of the rear of the building with the golf course in the foreground found on page 8. A landscaped setting was critical for a building to be imbued with the Tiki theme, whether in the form of a setback, a courtyard, or both. See examples in Appendix. The golf course which is now gone provided that landscaped setting for the restaurant building. This is a substantial alteration that does not allow the restaurant on its own to communicate its cultural values or thematic references. Historic Contexts: A‐Frame Buildings Historian Chad Randl published a cultural and architectural study of the A‐frame phenomenon in 2004. The form first gained popularity as a simple, tent‐like shape for vacation houses – compact, allowing for shelter combined with extensive glass in the recessed gable‐end wall, and modernist and distinctive in appearance. “The joining of A‐frames and commercial activity was natural. Even at the peak of their popularity in the mid‐1960s, triangular buildings were still odd enough to attract attention,” he notes (Randl 127). Such buildings provided a distinctive profile that was well suited to the commercial strips of the post‐war suburban landscape. On a small scale, they were popular with fast food chains and casual restaurants, used most notably by restaurants associated with motels (Howard Johnson’s was the most widespread example). While it originated with an alpine association, the A‐frame form was also commonly used for Tiki restaurants and bars, such as the subject property as it is depicted in the matchbook cover on p. 7 above. The A‐frame was also used as a signifier on conventional buildings that did not actually have an A‐frame shape, such as Tiki‐themed courtyard apartment buildings of the 1960s. A shallow triangular, shingled, over‐scaled form would frame the street entrance of an apartment building to attract attention on the street and to suggest the stylistic theme of the building. While residences and churches exist that took the A‐frame type to a higher artistic plane, A‐frame restaurants were generally popular, commercial examples that, by their shape, called attention to the businesses that occupied them within a commercial strip environment. In Orange, S. Glassell St. is not a typical commercial strip, but it is an extension of a major street that was developed at a later date on a larger scale, directly south of the early 20th century neighborhoods of Orange. Even Holy Family Church on the neighboring property to the north, built in the same period, refers to the Modernist A‐frame type in its massing and profile. EVALUATION OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE The property is evaluated herein for its eligibility for local historical designation with reference to the City of Orange General Plan Section for Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation. The City of Orange does not have specific criteria for local designation, but employs the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources (the City has other mechanisms for the designation of historic districts and historic preservation zoning overlays which are not relevant to the possible significance of this property). The property is evaluated under each of the California Register criteria, which mirror those of the National Register, below. Criterion 1: Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. The property has the potential for association with the historical theme of family dining and recreation in post‐war Orange County. This context has not been studied and documented to the 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 12 point where there is enough information to evaluate a minor example such as this. To use the example of the Tiki theme, at least two examples have been listed in the National Register, but these were especially significant examples that had changed very little since their period of significance and serve as a testament to the role of Tiki in popular post‐war culture. There is no apparent equivalent cultural value to this property. Further, because the golf course was, arguably, the greater and more unique draw for this property as a recreational venue, its loss significantly diminishes its ability to convey any significance under the theme of post‐war family recreation. The golf course was also much larger than the restaurant and appears to have carried the Tiki or Polynesian theme throughout. Therefore, along with the loss of any Tiki or Polynesian features that may have identified the restaurant and tied it into the theme, most of the theme was eliminated with the loss of the golf course. Due to the property’s inability to convey its significance in contributing to broad patterns of local history, it is not eligible under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history. No single historical person came to light with whom the property would be significantly associated. The property is not eligible under this criterion. Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values. The property’s architect, William E. Swank, is not established as a well‐known practitioner of the period who could be considered a “master architect,” and the building does not “(possess) high artistic values.” The property may once have embodied the “distinctive characteristics of a type,” serving as an example of the architectural type of an A‐frame. However, it does not exhibit the cultural associations that make A‐frame restaurants of historical interest due to its lack of integrity: while it is difficult to pinpoint its alterations due to lack of available evidence of its historical appearance, the property has changed businesses many times, the original pole sign no longer exists, and the entrance area does not retain the materials and decoration that the original restaurant apparently possessed (according to what little evidence we have of its early years), even if it was only minimally Tiki in its styling. More importantly, the development of the property had two significant components that appear to have been conceived and constructed together in order to express a theme and function that both would convey: that of a Tiki or Polynesian recreational and dining environment. With the loss of the golf course, the ability of the property to convey its significance is substantially diminished. The setting of the building is no longer what it was – a restaurant set within a golf course – and the function of the building is different as well since it is a freestanding restaurant business and no longer a part of a recreational unit that would have conveyed considerably more aesthetic information about popular architecture in early 1960s Orange County. The property is not eligible under Criterion 3 due to the lack of significance in its architect or its artistic values. It is also not eligible because of its inability to convey its significance through its embodiment of the built history of a type, period, or region. 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 13 Criterion 4: Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation. This criterion applies mainly to potential archaeological resources, and is outside of the scope of this study. This evaluation shows that the subject property was formerly a minimally Tiki‐themed restaurant associated with a miniature golf course. While the context of such properties are an emerging area of historical interest in Orange County’s recent past, we find that this theme is not well documented and that the historic integrity of the property appears to be too low to contribute in a meaningful way to our understanding of the theme. Historic Integrity Historic Integrity is defined as the ability of a property to convey its historic significance, expressed through surviving characteristics that it obtained during its period of significance. Broadly speaking, the early 1960s appearance of the building represents its period of significance. The following seven aspects of historic integrity – location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association – are defined by the National Park Service for use in the evaluation of properties for the National Register, and are also used as a guideline in many other designation programs. The historic integrity of 574 S. Glassell St. is analyzed below: Location: The property has not been moved and maintains integrity of location. Setting: The property’s setting has been compromised by the loss of the miniature golf course with which it was associated and its replacement with a large apartment building close to the south property line. It is clear from the 1963 aerial view on page 8 that the golf course and restaurant were sited so as to complement one another. The golf course functioned in part as the setting of the restaurant and gave it thematic and recreational meaning. Without this relationship, it is simply a restaurant, which does not reflect its historic use or setting. Design: The property may maintain integrity of design, but there is little in the public record to document its original appearance or any alterations. An A‐frame typically takes advantage of the contrast between the solid roof and the non‐load‐bearing end walls; no such element of the design remains present. The overall shape of the exaggerated, A‐frame roof is its most important feature and remains intact, but any information about the building from its historical period contained in the building’s decorative scheme appears to have been lost. The removal of the adjacent golf course also affected the integrity of design of the property as it was historically, since during that period the restaurant was a part of the larger miniature golf complex and related directly to the golf course. Materials: With so little documentation available, it is not known whether the building retains integrity of materials. However, this is unlikely to be an important factor in the property’s potential significance. 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 14 Workmanship: As for materials, there is not enough information available to determine the building contained significant workmanship or whether it maintains integrity of workmanship; the workmanship also is unlikely to be an important factor in the property’s potential significance. Feeling: The building does not possess historic feeling. There is very little in the way of exterior features to identify the building with its early period or character. While still used as a restaurant, the building has little to convey about the early 1960s when it was constructed. This is due to both the alterations to the building itself (the loss of any thematic decoration) and to the compromised setting, with the loss of the golf course that completed the complex historically and its replacement with a large apartment building directly next to the restaurant. Association: The building’s association with the historical theme of mid‐century themed family dining and recreation is tenuous due to the lack of integrity noted for the aspects above. In addition to the golf course’s role as the physical setting of the restaurant, it also would have had more to communicate about the family recreation themes that the property once represented. The restaurant on its own, as noted above, does not carry the associations of the recreation complex of which it was historically a part. While it proved difficult to document specific changes that were made to the building itself over time due to the lack of early images or permits, the property as a whole does not evoke its appearance in the early 1960s. The loss of the Tiki‐themed miniature golf course represents a loss of a significant component that made it of interest in the cultural, aesthetic and thematic contexts of 1960s Orange County. CONCLUSION This study finds that the property at 574 S. Glassell St. is not eligible for the California Register and is therefore not a historic resource for purposes of CEQA. The property was once a Tiki‐style restaurant associated with a neighboring miniature golf course. If intact, such a property might represent an important theme in the post‐World War II culture of Southern California, and Orange County in particular. However, the miniature golf course no longer exists, and the restaurant lacks the character‐defining features that would associate it with emerging historical and architectural contexts of popular culture in 1960s Orange County. The property lacks significance due to an inability to express these themes and provide information about local history. RESOURCES Auer, Michael J. Preservation Brief #25: Preservation of Historic Signs. Web. Accessed 3 Dec 2015. http://www.nps.gov/tps/how‐to‐preserve/briefs/25‐signs.htm City of Orange Building Permit Records. Hess, Alan. Googie: Fifties Coffee Shop Architecture. New York: Chronicle Books, 1985. “Historic Aerials.” Web. Accessed 1‐8 December 2015. www.historicaerials.com Aerial photographic images dated 1946, 1952, 1963, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1995, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, and 2012. “History of Orange.” City of Orange web site. Accessed 7 December 2015. http://www.cityoforange.org/about/history.asp 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 15 Jepsen, Chris. “Tiki Lagoon.” Web log. Accessed 29 April and 11 May 2016. http://tikilagoon.blogspot.com/. ‐‐‐‐. “O. C. History Round‐Up.” Web log. Accessed 2 May 2016. http://ochistorical.blogspot.com/. Randle, Chad. A‐frame. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2004. Tiki Central, discussion forums on Holo Wai Miniature Golf and Kim’s Restaurant. Web. Accessed 25 Nov 2015. http://www.tikiroom.com/tikicentral/bb/viewtopic.php?topic=22578&forum=2 Venturi, Robert, Denise Scott Brown, and Steven Izenour. Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge: MIT Press, Rev. ed. 1991. Additional on‐line sources are noted in the links below in the Appendix. 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 16 APPENDIX: Images of Tiki and A‐frame buildings, mostly located in Orange County. Don the Beachcomber, originally Sam’s Seafood, Huntington Beach; Tiki Architecture (web log) http://tikiarchitecture.blogspot.com/2010_ 06_01_archive.html Sam’s Seafood, Sunset Beach. Chris Jepsen, Trader Chris’s Tiki Lagoon (web log) http://tikilagoon.blogspot.com/ 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 17 Hana Kiki Garden Apartments, 1147 W. Memory Lane, Santa Ana. Chris Jepsen, O. C. History Roundup (web log) http://ochistorical.blogspot.com/2012/02/t iki‐mystery‐solved.html Islander Apartments, 2724 N. Bristol Ave., Santa Ana. http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/santaana,tr opical Includes poolside setting, tropical landscaping, tiki‐figured carved center post, and distinctive signage at the street (see next row). 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 18 Islander Apartments, 2724 N. Bristol Ave., Orange County Googie Archive (web log) http://googier.blogspot.com/2007/05/islan der‐apartments.html Includes poolside setting, tropical landscaping, tiki‐figured carved center post, and distinctive signage at the street (see next row). Outrigger Apartments, Pasadena, in 2008. Roadside Architecture (web log). http://www.roadarch.com/tiki6.html 574 S GLASSELL ST., ORANGE MAY 16, 2016 HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 19 Disneyland, Enchanted Tiki Room, 1963 image. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1963‐ Disneyland‐Tiki‐Room‐Photo‐11x14‐ Enchanted‐Disney‐Adventureland‐ /131001650608 Sam’s Seafood, historic image of owners in 1950. Photo: Sharon Katsaris. http://thehulagirls.blogspot.com/2015/06/ save‐don‐beachcomber‐sams‐seafood.html The Islander, Stockton, CA. Image shows relationship of A‐frame entrance and large‐ scale themed signage (vintage image, date not known). http://blogs.esanjoaquin.com/stockton‐ metro‐columnist/2012/10/25/tiki‐god‐ discovered/ South Central Coastal Information Center California State University, Fullerton Department of Anthropology MH-426 800 North State College Boulevard Fullerton, CA 92834-6846 657.278.5395 C alifornia H istorical R esources I nformation S ystem Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura and San Bernardino Counties sccic@fullerton.edu _____________________________________________________________________________ 6/11/2019 SCCIC File #: 20296.6458 Sherrie Cruz CAJA Environmental Services, LLC 15350 Sherman Way, Suite 315 Van Nuys, CA 91406 Re: Record Search Results for the Park Plaza Expansion Project The South Central Coastal Information Center received your records search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Orange, CA USGS 7.5’ quadrangle. The following summary reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a ½-mile radius. The search includes a review of all recorded archaeological and built-environment resources as well as a review of cultural resource reports on file. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest (SPHI), the California Historical Landmarks (SHL), the California Register of Historical Resources (CAL REG), the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and the California State Historic Properties Directory (HPD) listings were reviewed for the above referenced project site and a ¼-mile radius. Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources, archaeological site locations are not released. RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS SUMMARY Archaeological Resources* (*see note below) Within project area: 0 Within ½-mile radius: 0 Built-Environment Resources Within project area: 0 Within ½-mile radius: 5 Reports and Studies Within project area: 0 Within ½-mile radius: 13 OHP Historic Properties Directory (HPD) Within project area: 0 Within ¼-mile radius: 187 California Points of Historical Interest (SPHI) Within project area: 0 Within ¼-mile radius: 0 California Historical Landmarks (SHL) Within project area: 0 Within ¼-mile radius: 0 California Register of Historical Resources (CAL REG) Within project area: 0 Within ¼-mile radius: 107 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Within project area: 0 Within ¼-mile radius: 107 HISTORIC MAP REVIEW – The Anaheim, CA (1896, 1942) 15’ USGS historic maps indicated that in 1896 there was one building within the project area. There were several improved roads and buildings present in the project search radius which was located in the historic place name of Orange. The Santiago Creek ran just south of the project area and the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe R.R. ran to the west. In 1942, the building within the project area was no longer visible and no additional features appeared. There was much development in the area with more improved roads and buildings. All other features mentioned above were still present. RECOMMENDATIONS The archaeological sensitivity of the project location is unknown because there are no previous studies for the subject property. Additionally, the natural ground-surface appears to be obscured by urban development; therefore, surface artifacts would not be visible during a survey. While there are currently no recorded archaeological sites within the project area, buried resources could potentially be unearthed during project activities. Therefore, customary caution and a halt-work condition should be in place for all ground-disturbing activities. In the event that any evidence of cultural resources is discovered, all work within the vicinity of the find should stop until a qualified archaeological consultant can assess the find and make recommendations. Excavation of potential cultural resources should not be attempted by project personnel. It is also recommended that the Native American Heritage Commission be consulted to identify if any additional traditional cultural properties or other sacred sites are known to be in the area. The NAHC may also refer you to local tribes with particular knowledge of potential sensitivity. The NAHC and local tribes may offer additional recommendations to what is provided here and may request an archaeological monitor. Finally, the built-environment resources on the property are 45 years or older, therefore, a qualified architectural historian should be retained to study the property and make recommendations regarding those structures. For your convenience, you may find a professional consultant**at www.chrisinfo.org. Any resulting reports by the qualified consultant should be submitted to the South Central Coastal Information Center as soon as possible. **The SCCIC does not endorse any particular consultant and makes no claims about the qualifications of any person listed. Each consultant on this list self-reports that they meet current professional standards. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at 657.278.5395 Monday through Thursday 9:00 am to 3:30 pm. Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the SCCIC number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice. Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System, Isabela Kott GIS Technician/Staff Researcher *=When we report that no archaeological resources are recorded in your project area or within a specified radius around the project area; that does not necessarily mean that nothing is there. It may simply mean that the area has not yet been studied and that no information regarding the archaeological sensitivity of the property is available. The reported records search result does not preclude the possibility that surface or buried artifacts may be found during a survey of the property or ground-disturbing activities. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts. The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law. APPENDIX D • Energy Calculations Existing Annual VMT: Fleet Mix auto 91%1,506,031 gas (mpg)22.5 66,934.71 other 9%148,948 diesel (mpg)5.71 26,085.48 93,020.19 -1,081,351 Fleet Mix auto 91%522,001 gas (mpg)22.5 23,200.07 Fleet Mix auto 91%-984,029 gas (mpg)22.5 -43,734.64 other 9%51,627 diesel (mpg)5.71 9,041.42 other 9%-97,322 diesel (mpg)5.71 -17,044.06 32,241.49 -60,778.70 phase trips length (miles)days total Miles MPG Gallons Demolition 8 14.7 33 3,881 22.5 172.48 Grading 10 14.7 32 4,704 22.5 209.07 Building Construction 33 14.7 300 145,530 22.5 6,468.00 Architectural Coating 7 14.7 39 4,013 22.5 178.36 7,027.91 phase trips length (miles)days total Miles MPG Gallons Demolition 0 6.9 33 0 5.71 0.00 Grading 0 6.9 32 0 5.71 0.00 Building Construction 7 6.9 300 14,490 5.71 2,537.65 Architectural Coating 0 6.9 39 0 5.71 0.00 2,537.65 phase trips length (miles)days total Miles MPG Gallons Demolition 332 40 33 438,240 5.71 76,749.56 Grading 0 40 32 0 5.71 0.00 Building Construction 0 40 300 0 5.71 0.00 Architectural Coating 0 40 39 0 5.71 0.00 76,749.56 7,027.91 79,287.22 Phase Equipment Units Hours HP Load Factor Ave. Daily Load Factor Days HP Hours Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saw 1 8 81 0.73 0.6 33 9,366.19 Excavators 1 8 158 0.38 0.6 33 9,510.34 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 0.6 33 5,684.98 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 247 0.4 0.6 33 1,956.24 Grading concrete/Industrial Saw 1 8 81 0.73 0.6 32 9,082.37 excavators 1 8 158 0.41 0.6 32 9,950.21 Graders 1 8 187 0.41 0.6 32 11,776.51 tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 0.6 32 5,512.70 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 247 0.4 0.6 32 1,896.96 Building Construction cranes 1 4 231 0.29 0.6 300 48,232.80 Aerial Lifts 1 8 63 0.31 0.6 300 28,123.20 Off-Highway Tractors 1 7 97 0.37 0.6 300 45,221.40 forklifts 2 8 89 0.2 0.6 300 25,632.00 pavers 1 8 130 0.42 0.6 300 78,624.00 tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 0.6 300 51,681.60 Welders 1 8 46 0.45 0.6 300 29,808.00 Architectural Coating Air Compressor 1 8 78 0.48 0.6 578 103,873.54 Total On-Road Gas Total On-Road Diesl Fuel 1,654,979 Project Annual VMT:573,628 Worker Fuel (Gasoline, on-road) Haul Fuel (Diesel, on-road) Construction Equipment (Diesel, off-road) Net Project Annual VMT: Vender Fuel (Diesel, on-road) Total 475,933.03 103,083.87 110,111.77 Fuel Usage 23,796.65 Water Usage for fugitive dust control during construction Water application rate = 3,020 gallons/acre/day Each gallon of delivered potable water in Southern California is associated with 0.009727 kWhr of electricity). Grading 32 days x .9 acres x 3,020 gallons = 86,976 gallons x 0.009727 = 846 kWhr Equipment assumptions are provided in the CalEEMod output files for the Project and fuel usage estimate of 0.05 gallons of diesel fuel per horsepower-hour is from the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-3E. HP = hoursepower. Gallons of diesel fuel per HP-hour - 0.05. APPENDIX E • Geotechnical Report • Paleontological Resources Letter GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PARK PLAZA MEMORY CARE EXPANSION 574 SOUTH GLASSELL STREET CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: KSL Anaheim II, LP 5791 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No. 12137.002 January 29, 2019 January 29, 2019 Project No. 12137.002 KSL Anaheim II, LP 5791 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Alex Guerra Subject: Geotechnical Exploration Report Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 574 South Glassell Street City of Orange, California Leighton Consulting, Inc. has prepared this geotechnical exploration report for the proposed Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion at 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, California. The site is an approximately 0.9-acre rectangular lot, currently occupied by a one-story building that is used as a restaurant, surrounded by a paved parking area. We understand that the project consists of a two-story building for a new assisted living facility with associated parking stalls and driveways. Our subsurface exploration indicates that the site is underlain by a thin layer of man- made fill associated with construction of the existing improvements at the site and quaternary-age alluvial fan deposits. The fill is up to 4 to 5 feet thick and consisted mainly of silty sand. Below the fill, the alluvium generally consisted of dense to very dense sand and stiff to very stiff sandy clay. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings drilled to a maximum depth of 33 feet below the existing grade. No known active or potentially active faults are mapped to cross the site, and the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones. However, significant ground shaking should be anticipated at the site during the expected design life of the proposed structure. Based on the results of our exploration, the development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Presented in this report are our findings and recommendations for the proposed development. 12137.002 2 We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Christian Delgadillo, PE 83331 Project Engineer Djan Chandra, PE, GE 2376 Senior Principal Engineer CD/DJC/lr Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF via email) 12137.002 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Site Location and Proposed Project ........................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Exploration ............................................................ 1 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS ............................................................................... 3 2.1 Geologic Setting ........................................................................................ 3 2.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions ........................................................................ 3 2.2.1 Collapsible and Compressible Potential .......................................... 3 2.2.2 Expansion Potential ........................................................................ 4 2.2.3 Corrosivity of Soils .......................................................................... 4 2.3 Groundwater Conditions ............................................................................ 4 2.4 Faulting and Seismicity .............................................................................. 4 2.5 Secondary Seismic Hazards ...................................................................... 5 2.5.1 Liquefaction ..................................................................................... 5 2.5.2 Earthquake-Induced Settlement ...................................................... 6 2.5.3 Seismically-Induced Landslides ...................................................... 6 2.5.4 Earthquake-Induced Flooding ......................................................... 6 2.5.5 Seiches and Tsunamis .................................................................... 6 3.0 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 7 3.1 Earthwork ................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Site Preparation .............................................................................. 7 3.1.2 Overexcavation ............................................................................... 7 3.1.3 Fill Placement and Compaction....................................................... 8 3.2 Seismic Design Parameters ....................................................................... 8 3.3 Foundation Design ..................................................................................... 9 3.3.1 Allowable Bearing Capacity ............................................................ 9 3.3.2 Lateral Load Resistance ................................................................. 9 3.4 Slab-on-Grade Floor Slabs ........................................................................ 9 3.5 Lateral Earth Pressures ........................................................................... 10 3.6 Cement Type and Corrosion Protection ................................................... 11 3.7 Pavement Design .................................................................................... 11 3.9 Concrete Flatwork .................................................................................... 12 3.10 Surface Drainage ..................................................................................... 13 3.11 Temporary Excavation ............................................................................. 13 3.12 Trench Backfill ......................................................................................... 14 3.13 Plan Review ............................................................................................. 14 12137.002 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d) Section Page - ii - 3.14 Geotechnical Observation during Construction ........................................ 14 4.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 15 5.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................... 17 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report Rear of Text Figure 1 – Site Location Map Rear of Text Figure 2 – Boring Location Map Rear of Text Appendix A – Geotechnical Boring Logs Appendix B – Laboratory Test Results Appendix C – General Earthwork and Grading Recommendations 12137.002 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site Location and Proposed Project The proposed Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion site is located at 574 South Glassell in the city of Orange, California. The site location and immediate vicinity are shown on Figure 1, Site Location Map. The site is an approximately 0.9-acre rectangular lot, located west of South Glassell Street and bounded by Holy Family Cathedral Church and School to the north, a vacant land to the west, and Park Plaza Senior Facility to the south. The site is currently occupied by a one- story building that is used as a restaurant, surrounded by a paved parking area. Based on a conceptual plan provided by you and our communications with you, we understand that the project consists of a two-story building for a new assisted living facility, occupying a footprint area of approximately 14,000 square feet. The facility will include the associated parking stalls and driveways. 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Exploration The purpose of our geotechnical exploration was to evaluate the subsurface conditions and general soil characteristics at the project site in order to provide geotechnical parameters for design and construction of the project. The scope of this exploration included the following tasks: Background Review – A background review was performed of readily available, relevant geotechnical and geological literature pertinent to the site. References used in preparation of this report are listed in Section 4.0. Pre-Field Exploration Activities – A site visit was performed by a member of our technical staff to mark the boring locations. Underground Service Alert (USA) was notified to locate and mark existing underground utilities prior to our subsurface exploration. Field Exploration – On December 13, 2018, we advanced three hollow-stem auger borings (LB-1 through LB-3) to depths of 26½ to 33 feet below existing grade. The borings were geotechnically logged and sampled using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and California Ring samplers at selected intervals. The SPT and Ring samplers were driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer, free falling 30 inches. The number of blows was noted for every 6 inches of sampler penetration. Relatively undisturbed samples were collected 12137.002 2 from the borings using the Ring sampler. The sampling procedures generally followed ASTM D 1586 and D 3550 for SPT and split-barrel sampling of soil. In addition to driven samples, representative bulk soil samples were also collected from the borings. Each soil sample collected was described in general conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The samples were sealed, packaged, and transported to our soil laboratory. The soil descriptions and depths are noted on the boring logs included in Appendix A, Geotechnical Boring Logs. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Figure 2, Boring Location Map. Laboratory Tests – Laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples obtained during our field investigation. The laboratory testing program was designed to evaluate the physical and engineering characteristics of the onsite soil. Tests performed during this exploration include: − Moisture content and dry density (ASTM D 2216 and ASTM D 2937); − Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve (ASTM D 1140); − Consolidation (ASTM D 2435); − Direct Shear (ASTM D 3080); − R-Value (California Test Method 301); and − Corrosivity Suite – pH, Sulfate, Chloride, and Resistivity (California Test Methods 417, 422, and 532/643). Results of moisture content and dry density testing are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A. Other laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B, Laboratory Test Results. Engineering Analysis - The data obtained from our background review, field exploration, and laboratory testing program were evaluated and analyzed to develop the recommendations for the project. Report Preparation - The results of the exploration are summarized in this report presenting our findings and recommendations. 12137.002 3 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS 2.1 Geologic Setting The subject site is located in the Downey Plain within the southeastern margin of the Los Angeles Basin, a large structural depression within the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province of California. In general, the Downey Plain is bordered by the Coyote and Peralta Hills on the north, the Santa Ana Mountains and Tustin Plain to the east, the Pacific Ocean to the south and Los Angeles County to the west. Several broadly warped coastal mesas represent uplifted areas along the Newport-Inglewood structural zone. These mesas are separated by erosional gaps which were created by historic routes of the Santa Ana River. The near-surface native soils at the site are Quaternary-age, non-marine young alluvial fan deposits comprised of varying proportions of sand, gravel and cobbles, silt, and clay deposited by the Santiago Creek and Santa Ana River. 2.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions Our subsurface exploration indicates that the site is underlain by a thin layer of man-made fill associated with construction of the existing improvements at the site and quaternary-age alluvial fan deposits. The fill is up to 4 to 5 feet thick and consisted mainly of silty sand. Below the fill, the alluvium generally consisted of dense to very dense sand and stiff to very stiff sandy clay. A very dense sandy gravel layer was encountered in Boring LB-1 at a depth of 10 feet. Boring LB-3 was terminated at a depth of 33 feet due to drilling rig auger refusal in a layer very dense sand with gravel at this depth. Detailed descriptions of the soils encountered in the borings are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A. 2.2.1 Collapsible and Compressible Potential Hydrocollapse potential refers to the potential settlement of a soil under existing or future stresses (loads) upon being wetted. Soil compressibility refers to settlement potential of soils when subjected to increased loads, such as from a fill surcharge or building loads. Based on the soils encountered during the field exploration and our review of the laboratory test results, the soils have low collapse potential and low to moderate compressibility potential under the expected loads. 12137.002 4 2.2.2 Expansion Potential The near-surface soils generally consisted of granular materials; as such, the near-surface soils are expected to have very low to low expansion potential. 2.2.3 Corrosivity of Soils In general, soil environments that are detrimental to concrete have high concentrations of soluble sulfates and/or pH values of less than 5.5. Soils with chloride content greater than 500 parts per million (ppm) per California Test 532 are considered corrosive to steel, either in the form of reinforcement protected by concrete cover or plain steel substructures, such as steel pipes. Additionally, soils with a minimum resistivity of less than 1,000 Ohm-cm are considered corrosive to ferrous metal. Based on the laboratory test results, the subsurface soils at the site are considered to have low sulfate content and, therefore, not considered corrosive to concrete. The soils, however, are considered moderately corrosive to ferrous metal in direct contact with the soils. 2.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered in our borings drilled to a maximum depth of 33 feet below the existing grade. The historically high groundwater level for this area, according to the California Geologic Survey (1997), is on the order of 40 feet below the existing ground surface. Deep excavations are not expected for the proposed project; therefore, groundwater is not anticipated to adversely impact construction of the proposed project. The groundwater level is expected to fluctuate seasonally. Fluctuations of the groundwater level, localized zones of perched water, and an increase in soil moisture should be anticipated during and following the rainy seasons or period of locally intense rainfall or storm water runoff. 2.4 Faulting and Seismicity No active faults are mapped or known to cross the site, and the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (Bryant and Hart, 2007). The principal seismic hazard at the site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake occurring along any of several major active and potentially active faults in southern 12137.002 5 California. Known regional active faults that could produce significant ground shaking at the site include the San Joaquin Hills Blind Thrust and Whittier faults located approximately 6.1 miles and 9.6 miles, respectively, from the site. The intensity of ground shaking at a given location depends primarily upon the earthquake magnitude, the distance from the source, and the site response characteristics. Peak horizontal ground accelerations are generally used to evaluate the intensity of ground motion. Using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Seismic Design Maps (USGS, 2018), the peak ground acceleration for the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCEG) adjusted for the Site Class effects (PGAM) is 0.53g. Based on the USGS online unified hazard tool program (USGS, 2014), the modal seismic event is Moment Magnitude (MW) 6.9 at a distance of 6.5 miles. 2.5 Secondary Seismic Hazards Secondary seismic hazards in the region could include soil liquefaction and the associated surface manifestation, earthquake-induced landsliding and flooding, seiches, and tsunamis. A site-specific evaluation of these potential hazards is discussed in the following sections. 2.5.1 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a seismic phenomenon in which loose, saturated, granular soils behave similarly to a fluid when subjected to high-intensity ground shaking. Liquefaction occurs when three general conditions exist: 1) shallow groundwater; 2) low density, fine, clean sandy soils; and 3) strong ground motion. Effects of liquefaction can include sand boils, settlement, and bearing capacity failures below structural foundations. Review of the Seismic Hazard Zone Map for the Orange Quadrangle (CGS, 1998) indicates that the subject site is not located within an area that has been identified by the State of California as being potentially susceptible to the occurrence of liquefaction. Additionally, due to the presence dense to very dense sandy soils and a relatively deep historically high groundwater of 40 feet below grade, the liquefaction potential at the site is very low. 12137.002 6 2.5.2 Earthquake-Induced Settlement Seismically-induced settlement consists of dry dynamic settlement (above groundwater) and liquefaction-induced settlement (below groundwater). These settlements occur primarily within loose to medium dense sandy soil due to reduction in volume during, and shortly after, an earthquake event. We have performed analyses to calculate the potential earthquake- induced settlement at the site. The settlements of these strata were estimated to result in a cumulative settlement of less than ½ inches. Differential settlement is estimated to be approximately one half of the total settlement. 2.5.3 Seismically-Induced Landslides No significant ground slopes exist at the site and in the vicinity. Therefore, the potential for seismically-induced landslides is considered negligible. 2.5.4 Earthquake-Induced Flooding Earthquake-induced flooding can be caused by failure of dams or other water-retaining structures as a result of earthquakes. Due to the absence of these structures near the site, the potential for earthquake-induced flooding of the site in considered low. 2.5.5 Seiches and Tsunamis Seiches are large waves generated in enclosed bodies of water in response to ground shaking. Tsunamis are waves generated in large bodies of water by fault displacement or major ground movement. Based on the absence of an enclosed water body near the site and the inland location of the site, seiche and tsunami risks at the site are considered negligible. 12137.002 7 3.0 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are based upon the exhibited geotechnical engineering properties of the soils and their anticipated response both during and after construction as well as proper field observation and testing during construction. The recommendations are considered minimum and may be superseded by more restrictive requirements of the architect, structural engineer, building code, or governing agencies. The geotechnical consultant should review the grading plan, foundation plan and specifications as they become available to verify that the recommendations presented in this report have been incorporated into the plans prepared for the project. 3.1 Earthwork We recommend all earthwork for the project be performed in accordance with the following recommendations, future grading plan review report(s), the City of Orange grading requirements and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications included in Appendix C. In case of conflict the following recommendations shall supersede those provided in Appendix C. Earthwork is expected to consist of subgrade preparation, precise grading, foundation excavation, and other site improvement work. Recommendations for site earthwork are provided in the following sections. 3.1.1 Site Preparation Prior to construction, the site should be cleared of existing improvements and debris. Existing utility and irrigation lines should also be removed if they interfere with the proposed construction. Cavities resulting from removal of the existing underground structures and lines should be excavated to expose competent material before being properly backfilled under the observation and testing of the geotechnical consultant. 3.1.2 Overexcavation To reduce the potential of adverse differential settlement and to provide uniform support, we recommend that the footings and slab-on-grade for the proposed building be underlain by a minimum 3 feet of compacted fill established on competent soils. The overexcavation should extend laterally 3 feet beyond the outside edges of the foundation, except where it 12137.002 8 is constrained by the property lines or existing improvements to be protected in-place. Pavement and concrete flatwork should be underlain by a minimum 12 inches of compacted fill. Prior to replacing the overexcavated material, the area should be scarified a minimum of 6 inches, moisture-conditioned to at least 2 to 4 percentage points above optimum moisture content, and recompacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Local conditions may be encountered that could require additional overexcavation beyond the above noted minimum to obtain an acceptable subgrade. The actual depths and lateral extents of remedial grading will be determined by the geotechnical consultant based on subsurface conditions encountered during grading. 3.1.3 Fill Placement and Compaction The onsite soils, to be used as compacted structural fill, should be free of organic material or construction debris. Any imported fill soil should be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to placement as fill. Fill soils should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches, moisture- conditioned to at least 2 to 4 percentage points above optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557. 3.2 Seismic Design Parameters Design parameters for minimum seismic load based on the 2016 California Building Code are as follows: Table 1 – 2016 CBC Based Seismic Design Parameters Categorization/Coefficient Design Value Site Class D Adjusted (5% damped) spectral response acceleration parameter at short period, SMS 1.486g Adjusted (5% damped) spectral response acceleration parameter at a period of 1 sec, SM1 0.814g Design (5% damped) spectral response acceleration parameter at short period, SDS 0.991g Design (5% damped) spectral response acceleration parameter at a period of 1 sec, SD1 0.543g 12137.002 9 3.3 Foundation Design 3.3.1 Allowable Bearing Capacity Upon completion of the recommended site preparation as described in this report, the proposed building may be supported by a shallow spread footing foundation system. The footings should be embedded at a depth of least 18 inches below exterior grade with a minimum width of 12 inches. A net allowable soil bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for design of the footings. The allowable capacity may be increase by 300 psf for each additional foot of footing depth or width to a maximum value of 4,000 psf. The recommended values for bearing capacity can be increased by one-third for transient loads such as wind and seismic forces. Settlement induced by static loading is anticipated to be on the order of 1 inch. Differential settlement can be taken as half the total settlement over a horizontal distance of 30 feet. 3.3.2 Lateral Load Resistance The soil resistance available to withstand lateral loads on a shallow foundation is a function of the frictional resistance along the base of the footing and the passive resistance that may develop as the face of the structure tends to move into the soil. The frictional resistance between the base of the foundation and the subgrade soil may be computed using a coefficient of friction of 0.30. The passive resistance may be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pcf to a maximum value of 3,000 psf, assuming there is constant contact between the footing and undisturbed soil. The above coefficient of friction and passive resistance are values without an appreciable factor of safety, so the structural engineer should apply the applicable factors of safety and/or load factors during design. 3.4 Slab-on-Grade Floor Slabs Slab-on-grade floor slabs should be placed on properly prepared subgrade soils as described in Section 3.1. The floor slabs are recommended to be underlain by a synthetic sheeting to serve as a retarder to moisture vapor transmission in areas where a moisture-sensitive floor covering (such as vinyl, tile, or carpet) or equipment is planned. The sheeting is recommended to be a minimum 15-mil thick and consist of polyethylene or similar material that meets or exceeds 12137.002 10 specifications for ASTM E1745 Class A vapor retarders. Vapor barrier seams should be overlapped a minimum of 6 inches and taped or otherwise sealed. A two-inch thick sand layer is recommended below the vapor barrier to prevent punctures. 3.5 Lateral Earth Pressures The following lateral earth pressures may be used for the design of retaining walls with a drained and level backfill. Table 2 – Equivalent Earth Pressures Condition Equivalent Fluid Unit Weight with Granular and Level Backfill (psf/feet) Active 40 At-Rest 60 Passive 300 Retaining structures should be provided with a drainage system to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The above values do not contain an appreciable factor of safety, so the structural engineer should apply the applicable factors of safety and/or load factors during design. Walls that are free to rotate or deflect may be designed using active earth pressure. For walls that are fixed against rotation, the at-rest pressure should be used. In addition to the above lateral pressures from retained earth, lateral pressures from other superimposed loads, such as those from vehicle traffic and adjacent structures, should be added, if the surcharge loads fall within a horizontal distance behind the wall equal to the full height of the wall from the foundation level. The surcharge loads should be added to the above recommended lateral earth pressures. Resistance to lateral loads will be provided by a combination of friction between the soil and structure interface and passive pressure acting against the retaining wall. For calculating lateral resistance, a passive pressure of 300 psf per foot of depth to a maximum of 3,000 psf and a frictional coefficient of 0.30 may be used. Backfills for retaining walls should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D 1557). During construction of retaining 12137.002 11 walls, the backcut should be made in accordance with the requirements of Cal/OSHA Construction Safety Orders. Relatively light construction equipment should be used to backfill retaining walls. We also recommend using at-rest pressures for design of walls supporting settlement-sensitive structures. 3.6 Cement Type and Corrosion Protection Based on the available laboratory test results, the near-surface soils at the site are expected to have low sulfate content. Type II cement may be used for concrete in contact with onsite soils and the concrete should be designed for “negligible” sulfate exposure in accordance with ACI 318 (ACI, 2011). However, Type V cement should be used for concrete expected to be in contact with recycled water. The soils are considered moderately corrosive to buried ferrous metals. Ferrous pipe should be avoided by using high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or other non- ferrous pipe when possible. Ferrous pipe, if used, should be protected by polyethylene bags, tap or coatings, di-electric fittings or other means to separate the pipe from onsite soils. 3.7 Pavement Design Driveways and parking areas can be constructed using conventional asphalt concrete (AC) over aggregate base (AB). We have designed the pavement sections using the R-value of 50 for different Traffic Indices (TI) and the minimum pavement thickness is presented in the following table. R-value of the tested near-surface soil sample was 58. The pavement design was performed using the method in the Orange County Highway Design Manual. Table 3 - Pavement Sections Traffic Index Flexible Pavement (feet) AC AB 5 or less 3.0 4.5 6 3.5 5.0 7 4.5 5.0 8 5.0 5.5 12137.002 12 Concrete pavement, if used, may consist of 6 inches of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) over 6 inches of AB. The PCC pavement sections should be provided with crack-control joints spaced no more than 10 feet on-center each way, to control where cracks develop. All pavement construction should be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Field inspection and periodic testing, as needed during placement of the base course materials, should be undertaken to ensure that the requirements of the standard specifications are fulfilled. Prior to placement of aggregate base, the subgrade soil should be processed to a minimum depth of 8 inches, moisture-conditioned, as necessary, and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Localized areas of loose soils may be encountered that require deeper removal and recompaction. The actual extent of the removal depth will be best determined during construction when direct observation of the subgrade soils can be made. Aggregate base should be moisture conditioned, as necessary, and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction. Aggregate base and asphalt materials should conform to Sections 200-2 and 203, respectively, of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. PCC should conform to Section 201 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3.9 Concrete Flatwork Exterior concrete slabs such as sidewalks, courtyards and pedestrian access ramps often crack after concrete placement and during curing. Inclusion of joints at frequent intervals and reinforcement will help control the locations of the cracks, and thus reduce the unsightly appearance. When cracking occurs, repairs may be needed to mitigate the trip hazard and/or improve the appearance. There are a number of well-known steps that can be taken during construction to reduce the amount of cracking or its consequences. These steps include, but are not limited to, the following. As a minimum, exterior concrete slabs should be at least 4 inches thick, and driveways or ramps should have the edges thickened to at least 6 inches. Construction or weakened plane joints should be spaced at 12137.002 13 intervals of 8 feet or less. We suggest concrete slabs be reinforced using No. 3 rebar, 18 inches on center in both directions, placed at mid-thickness. Cracking of concrete is often not due to settlement or heave of soils, but often due to other factors such as the use of too high a water/cement ratio and/or inadequate steps taken to prevent moisture loss during curing. These causes of concrete distress can be reduced by proper design of the concrete mix and by proper placement and curing of the concrete. 3.10 Surface Drainage Ponding of water adjacent to structures should be avoided. During and after construction, positive drainage should be provided to direct surface water away from structures towards suitable, non-erosive drainage devices. Drainage of surface water away from the proposed structure should be provided by adequate slopes to all graded and paved surfaces. Where good surface drainage is not possible, subdrains should be provided within planter areas to prevent accumulation of water within the upper soils. Proper drainage will be important to minimize infiltration of water into adjacent subgrade soils. Such drainage will also be important for proper plant growth. 3.11 Temporary Excavation All temporary excavations should be performed in accordance with project plans, specifications, and all OSHA requirements. Excavations 5 feet or deeper should be laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements before personnel are allowed to enter. No surcharge loads should be permitted within a horizontal distance equal to the height of cut or 5 feet, whichever is greater from the top of the cut, unless the cut is shored. Based on our borings, the soils at the project site should be readily excavated using conventional excavating equipment in good working condition. During construction, the soil conditions should be regularly evaluated to verify that conditions are as anticipated. The contractor shall be responsible for providing the “competent person” required by OSHA standards to evaluate soil conditions. Close coordination between the competent person and the geotechnical engineer should be maintained to facilitate construction while providing safe excavations. 12137.002 14 3.12 Trench Backfill Utility trenches can be backfilled with the onsite material, provided it is free of debris, organic material and oversized material (greater than 6 inches in diameter). All backfill should be placed in thin lifts (appropriate for the type of compaction equipment), moisture conditioned above optimum, and mechanically compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, relative to the ASTM D 1557 laboratory maximum density. Prior to backfilling the trench, pipes should be bedded in and covered with sand that exhibits a Sand Equivalent (SE) of 30 or greater. The pipe bedding should extend at least 4 inches below the pipeline invert and at least 12 inches over the top of the pipeline. The bedding and shading sand is recommended to be densified in place by vibratory, lightweight compaction equipment and not by water jetting. Jetting or hydro-consolidation is not suitable for this project site and will result in unstable saturated subgrade. Where utility trenches cross underneath building footing, the trenches should be plugged by a minimum of 2 feet of impermeable clayey soils or sand/cement slurry to reduce the potential for water intrusion underneath the slab. 3.13 Plan Review The final grading and foundation plans should implement the recommendations presented in this report and should be reviewed by the project geotechnical consultant. 3.14 Geotechnical Observation during Construction All grading and excavation should be performed under the observation and testing of the geotechnical consultant at the following stages: Upon completion of site clearing; During site earthwork; During preparation of subgrades; During fill placement; During excavation and backfilling of all utility trenches; Placement of asphalt concrete; and When any unusual or unexpected geotechnical conditions are encountered. 12137.002 15 4.0 REFERENCES American Concrete Institute (ACI), 2014, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary. Bryant, W .A., and Hart, E.W., 2007, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Zones Maps, Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey, Special Publication 42, 2007 Interim Revision. California Building Standards Commission, 2016, 2016 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, Based on 2012 International Building Code, Effective January 1, 2017. California Geological Survey (CGS), 2000, CD-ROM containing digital images of Official Maps of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones that affect the Southern Region, DMG CD 2000-003 2000. _____, 1997, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Orange, California 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Map, Seismic Hazard Zone Report No. 11 (Revised 2001). _____, 1998, State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map – Tustin Quadrangle, Revised Official Map, Released April 15, 1998. Morton, P.K. and Miller, R.V., 1981, Geologic Map of Orange County, California, Showing Mines and Mineral Deposits, Plate 1 of California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 204. Public Works Standards, Inc., 2018, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, 2018 Edition, published by BNI Building News. Tokimatsu, K., and Seed, H.R., 1987, Evaluation of Settlements in Sands due to Earthquake Shaking, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, v. 113, n.8, p. 861- 878. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2014, Earthquake Hazards Program - Unified Hazard Tool, https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/. _____, 2015a, Interactive Fault Map, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/map/ _____, 2015b, Interactive Geologic Map, http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/maps/MapView/ 12137.002 16 _____, 2018, United States Seismic Design Maps website, see: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/usdesign.php Yerkes, R.F., McCollouch, T.H., Schoellhamer, J.E. and Vedder, J.G, 1965, Geology of the Los Angeles Basin, California - An Introduction: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 420-A pp. 57. Youd, T.L, Idriss, I.M., Andrus, R.D., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J.T., Dobry, R., Finn, L., Harder, L.F., Hynes, M.E., Ishihara, K., Koester, J.P., Liao, S.C., Marcuson, W.F. III, Martin, G.R., Mitchell, J.K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M.S., Robertson, P.K., Seed, R.B., Stokoe, K.H. II, 2001, “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, , Vol. 127, No. 10, October 2001. 12137.002 17 5.0 LIMITATIONS This report was based solely on data obtained from a limited number of geotechnical exploration, and soil samples and tests. Such information is, by necessity, incomplete. The nature of many sites is such that differing soil or geologic conditions can be present within small distances and under varying climatic conditions. Changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are only valid if Leighton Consulting has the opportunity to observe subsurface conditions during grading and construction, to confirm that our preliminary data are representative for the site. Leighton Consulting should also review the construction plans and project specifications, when available, to comment on the geotechnical aspects. It should be noted that the recommendations in this report are subject to the limitations presented in this section. An information sheet prepared by GBC (Geotechnical Business Council) is also included at the rear of the text. We recommend that all individuals using this report read the limitations along with the attached information sheet. Our professional services were performed in accordance with the prevailing standard of professional care as practiced by other geotechnical engineers in the area. We do not make any warranty, either expressed or implied. The report may not be used by others or for other projects without the expressed written consent of our client and our firm. Geotechnical-Engineering Report Important Information about This Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. While you cannot eliminate all such risks, you can manage them. The following information is provided to help. The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) has prepared this advisory to help you – assumedly a client representative – interpret and apply this geotechnical-engineering report as effectively as possible. In that way, clients can benefit from a lowered exposure to the subsurface problems that, for decades, have been a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. If you have questions or want more information about any of the issues discussed below, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. Active involvement in the Geoprofessional Business Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk-confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Geotechnical-Engineering Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil- works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical-engineering study is unique, each geotechnical- engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Those who rely on a geotechnical-engineering report prepared for a different client can be seriously misled. No one except authorized client representatives should rely on this geotechnical-engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one – not even you – should apply this report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read this Report in Full Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical- engineering report did not read it in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. Read this report in full. You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer about Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project-specific factors when designing the study behind this report and developing the confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys. A few typical factors include: • the client’s goals, objectives, budget, schedule, and risk-management preferences; • the general nature of the structure involved, its size, configuration, and performance criteria; • the structure’s location and orientation on the site; and • other planned or existing site improvements, such as retaining walls, access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site’s size or shape; • the function of the proposed structure, as when it’s changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light-industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes – even minor ones – and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. This Report May Not Be Reliable Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, that it could be unwise to rely on a geotechnical-engineering report whose reliability may have been affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If your geotechnical engineer has not indicated an “apply-by” date on the report, ask what it should be, and, in general, if you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis – if any is required at all – could prevent major problems. Most of the “Findings” Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site’s subsurface through various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing were performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgment to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ – maybe significantly – from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team from project start to project finish, so the individual can provide informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. This Report’s Recommendations Are Confirmation-Dependent The recommendations included in this report – including any options or alternatives – are confirmation-dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgment and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation- dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals’ misinterpretation of geotechnical- engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a full-time member of the design team, to: • confer with other design-team members, • help develop specifications, • review pertinent elements of other design professionals’ plans and specifications, and • be on hand quickly whenever geotechnical-engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction observation. Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical-engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you’ve included the material for informational purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that “informational purposes” means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report, but they may rely on the factual data relative to the specific times, locations, and depths/elevations referenced. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study – e.g., a “phase-one” or “phase-two” environmental site assessment – differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical-engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical- engineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own environmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk-management guidance. As a general rule, do not rely on an environmental report prepared for a different client, site, or project, or that is more than six months old. Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, none of the engineer’s services were designed, conducted, or intended to prevent uncontrolled migration of moisture – including water vapor – from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building- envelope or mold specialists. Copyright 2016 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBA’s specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any kind. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent Telephone: 301/565-2733 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org ³ 0 2,000 4,000 Feet Figure 1 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2019 Thematic Information: Leighton 1 " = 2,000 ' Project: 12137.002 Eng/Geol: DJC Map Saved as V:\Drafting\12137\002\Maps\12137-002_F01_SLM_2019-01-22.mxd on 1/22/2019 4:47:23 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (btran) Date: January 2019 SITE LOCATION MAP Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 574 South Glassell Street Orange, California Approximate Site Location T.D. 33'T.D. 26.5'T.D. 26.5'Glassell St. APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOGS SM CL GW SP 111 127 130 130 11 2 2 2 B-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 S-5 RV 2 3 5 21 50/6" 26 36 35 29 38 38 50/5" Surface: 5 inches of asphalt concrete Artificial Fill (Af) @ 0.4': Silty SAND, slightly moist, yellowish brown, fine sand, trace of clay Quaternary-aged young alluvial fan deposits (Qyf) @ 5': Sandy CLAY, stiff, yellowish brown, moist, FeO staining, trace subroudned gravel, low plasticity @ 10': Well-graded GRAVEL with Sand, very dense, olive brown, slightly moist, fine to coarse gravel, subangular to subrounded, fine to coarse sand @ 15': Fine sand @ 20': Poorly-graded SAND with Gravel, very dense, olive brown, slightly moist, fine to coarse gravel, fine to medium sand @ 25': No recovery Total depth of boring: 26.5 feet Groundwater not encountered during drilling Backfilled with soil cuttings, tamped, and patched with cold asphalt ' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLE GRAB SAMPLE RING SAMPLE SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE TUBE SAMPLE B C G R S T Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. Ground Elevation DepthBlowsElevationPer 6 InchesPage 1 of 1AttitudesSAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling, Inc.Content, %GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-1 Logged By Date Drilled * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * CD FeetS CD Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 30" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Soil Class.12-13-18 SOIL DESCRIPTION (U.S.C.S.)LogType of TestsGraphicpcfLocation See Figure 2 - Boring Location Map Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 12137.002 Drilling Method 8"FeetHole Diameter MoistureDry DensityN This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may be gradual. TYPE OF TESTS: -200 AL CN CO CR CU % FINES PASSING ATTERBERG LIMITS CONSOLIDATION COLLAPSE CORROSION UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DS EI H MD PP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEX HYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITY POCKET PENETROMETER R VALUE SA SE SG UC SIEVE ANALYSIS SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHSample No. SM CL SC SP SW 95 111 115 17 13 2 R-1 R-2 S-3 R-4 S-5 S-6 DS CN 2 3 3 3 3 5 24 20 20 23 34 47 33 17 17 15 23 30 Surface: 2.5 inches of asphalt concrete Artificial Fill (Af) @ 0.2': Silty SAND, slightly moist, yellowish brown, fine sand, trace of clay Quaternary-aged young alluvial fan deposits (Qyf) @ 2': Sandy CLAY, medium stiff, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand, low plasticity @ 5': Clayey SAND, stiff, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand, trace subrounded gravel, nonplastic to low plasticity @ 10': Poorly-graded SAND with Gravel, dense,olive brown, slightly moist, subangular to subrounded gravel @ 15': Very dense, fine to coarse gravel, fine to medium sand @ 18': Rig chatter, hard drilling @ 25': Well-graded SAND, very dense, olive brown, slightly moist, fine to coarse sand, little fine gravel Total depth of boring: 26.5 feet Groundwater not encountered during drilling Backfilled with soil cuttings, tamped, and patched with cold asphalt ' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLE GRAB SAMPLE RING SAMPLE SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE TUBE SAMPLE B C G R S T Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. Ground Elevation DepthBlowsElevationPer 6 InchesPage 1 of 1AttitudesSAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling, Inc.Content, %GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-2 Logged By Date Drilled * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * CD FeetS CD Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 30" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Soil Class.12-13-18 SOIL DESCRIPTION (U.S.C.S.)LogType of TestsGraphicpcfLocation See Figure 2 - Boring Location Map Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 12137.002 Drilling Method 8"FeetHole Diameter MoistureDry DensityN This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may be gradual. TYPE OF TESTS: -200 AL CN CO CR CU % FINES PASSING ATTERBERG LIMITS CONSOLIDATION COLLAPSE CORROSION UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DS EI H MD PP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEX HYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITY POCKET PENETROMETER R VALUE SA SE SG UC SIEVE ANALYSIS SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHSample No. SM CL SP-SM SM CL 102 115 108 117 7 13 4 15 B-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 S-4 R-5 S-6 CR CN -200 3 4 4 2 3 5 8 17 20 7 4 4 3 5 7 2 2 3 Surface: 4 inches of asphalt concrete Artificial Fill (Af) @ 0.3': Silty SAND, slightly moist, yellowish brown, fine sand, trace of clay Quaternary-aged young alluvial fan deposits (Qyf) @ 2': Silty SAND, loose, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand @ 5': Sandy CLAY, stiff, brown, moist, low plasticity, fine sand, trace fine gravel, subangular gravel @ 10': Poorly-graded SAND with Silt, dense, olive brown, slightly moist, fine sand, little gravel, fine subangular gravel @ 15': Silty SAND, medium dense, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand, trace of clay @ 21': Sandy CLAY, very stiff, reddish brown, moist, low plasticity, trace subangular gravel ' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLE GRAB SAMPLE RING SAMPLE SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE TUBE SAMPLE B C G R S T Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. Ground Elevation DepthBlowsElevationPer 6 InchesPage 1 of 2AttitudesSAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling, Inc.Content, %GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * CD FeetS CD Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 30" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Soil Class.12-13-18 SOIL DESCRIPTION (U.S.C.S.)LogType of TestsGraphicpcfLocation See Figure 2 - Boring Location Map Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 12137.002 Drilling Method 8"FeetHole Diameter MoistureDry DensityN This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may be gradual. TYPE OF TESTS: -200 AL CN CO CR CU % FINES PASSING ATTERBERG LIMITS CONSOLIDATION COLLAPSE CORROSION UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DS EI H MD PP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEX HYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITY POCKET PENETROMETER R VALUE SA SE SG UC SIEVE ANALYSIS SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHSample No. SPS-7 25 21 27 @ 30': Poorly-graded SAND with Gravel, very dense, grayish brown, slightly moist, fine sand, fine to coarse gravel, subangular @ 32': Very hard drilling @ 33': Auger refusal Total depth of boring: 33 feet (Auger refusal) Groundwater not encountered during drilling Backfilled with soil cuttings, tamped, and patched with cold asphalt ' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLE GRAB SAMPLE RING SAMPLE SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE TUBE SAMPLE B C G R S T Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. Ground Elevation DepthBlowsElevationPer 6 InchesPage 2 of 2AttitudesSAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling, Inc.Content, %GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * CD FeetS CD Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 30" Drop 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Soil Class.12-13-18 SOIL DESCRIPTION (U.S.C.S.)LogType of TestsGraphicpcfLocation See Figure 2 - Boring Location Map Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 12137.002 Drilling Method 8"FeetHole Diameter MoistureDry DensityN This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may be gradual. TYPE OF TESTS: -200 AL CN CO CR CU % FINES PASSING ATTERBERG LIMITS CONSOLIDATION COLLAPSE CORROSION UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DS EI H MD PP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEX HYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITY POCKET PENETROMETER R VALUE SA SE SG UC SIEVE ANALYSIS SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHSample No. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS LB-3R-25.0Ring0.000.001.000.00472.6778.64394.03B235.0878.64156.4460.339.7Project Name:Park Plaza ExpansionProject No.:12137.002Tested By:R. ManningDate:12/21/18Moisture CorrectionDry Weight of Sample + Cont. (g)Weight of Container (g)Container No.:Wet Weight of Soil + Container (g)Sample Dry Weight DeterminationBrown sandy silty clay s(CL-ML)Weight of Container (g)Moisture Content (%)Soil IdentificationDry Weight of Soil + Container (g) PERCENT PASSING No. 200 SIEVE ASTM D 1140Weight of Sample + Container (g)Method (A or B)Weight of Container (g)Weight of Dry Sample (g)% Passing No. 200 Sieve% Retained No. 200 SieveAfter WashDry Weight of Sample (g) Boring No.Sample No.Depth (ft.)Sample TypePassing #200 LB-3, R-2 @ 5 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Sample Type: Ring Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Strength Parameters Dry Density (pcf) C (psf)I (o)Saturation (%) Peak 213 28 Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Ultimate 228 27 Final Moisture Content (%) 1.295 1.289 Dark yellowish brown silty clay (CL-ML) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-2 R-1 2 56.7 17.11 92.9 0.0017 4.000 2.380 2.286 0.0017 66.1 2.000 0.9745 17.11 24.0 1.000 2.415 0.9859 24.9 99.2 1.000 2.415 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Drained - ASTM D 3080 1.000 0.755 0.726 0.0017 17.11 92.1 2.415 Soil Identification: 12-18 Project No.: 12137.002 55.6 0.9923 1.000 24.4 Park Plaza Expansion 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 0 0.1 0.2 0.3Shear Stress (ksf)Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00Shear Stress (ksf)Normal Stress (ksf) DS LB-2, R-1 @ 2 Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft.) Moisture Content (%) ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 17.3 110.7LB-2 R-2 12.7 Soil Identification: Dark olive brown silt with sand (ML)s Project No.: Park Plaza Expansion 01-19 12137.002 Time Readings 0.479 67 89111.3 Degree of Saturation (%)Dry Density(pcf) 0.515 Void Ratio 5.0 0.0000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 0.8000 0.9000 1.0000 0.1 1.0Deformation Dial Reading (in.)Log of Time (min.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00Deformation (%)Pressure, p (ksf) 0.0000 0.2000 0.4000 0.6000 0.8000 1.0000 1.2000 0.0 10.0 Square Root of Time (min.1/2) Inundate with Tap water Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft.) Moisture Content (%) ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 19.2 103.5LB-3 R-1 6.8 Soil Identification: Dark yellowish brown silty sand (SM) Project No.: Park Plaza Expansion 01-19 12137.002 Time Readings 0.615 28 82101.8 Degree of Saturation (%)Dry Density(pcf) 0.656 Void Ratio 2.0 0.0000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 0.8000 0.9000 1.0000 0.1 1.0Deformation Dial Reading (in.)Log of Time (min.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00Deformation (%)Pressure, p (ksf) 0.0000 0.2000 0.4000 0.6000 0.8000 1.0000 1.2000 0.0 10.0 Square Root of Time (min.1/2) Inundate with Tap water Project Name: Tested By : Date: Project No. : Data Input By: J. Ward Date: Boring No.: Depth (ft.) : Sample No. : B-1 Container No. Initial Soil Wt. (g) (Wt) Box Constant Yellowish brown SM Resistance Reading (ohm) 33.08 Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) Park Plaza Expansion 01/02/19 01/09/19 1-5 12137.002 LB-3 G. Berdy SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST DOT CA TEST 643 Temp. (°C)pH Soil pH 5300 5500 222.61 69.47 MC =(((1+Mci/100)x(Wa/Wt+1))-1)x100 5300 33.1 59 31 7.28 22.4 4 40 50 130.223550040.90 5300 Min. Resistivity DOT CA Test 643DOT CA Test 417 Part II DOT CA Test 422 (%) (ppm) (ppm) DOT CA Test 643 1.000 Chloride Content (ohm-cm) Moisture Content Sulfate Content 5 1 2 Water Added (ml) (Wa) 30 Adjusted Moisture Content (MC)Dry Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) 5500 Soil Identification:* *California Test 643 requires soil specimens to consist only of portions of samples passing through the No. 8 US Standard Sieve before resistivity testing. Therefore, this test method may not be representative for coarser materials. Wt. of Container (g)25.26 5500 1.81 225.38 Moisture Content (%) (MCi) Wet Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g)Specimen No. 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm)Moisture Content (%) R-VALUE TEST RESULTS DOT CA Test 301 PROJECT NAME: Park Plaza Expansion PROJECT NUMBER: 12137.002 BORING NUMBER: LB-1 DEPTH (FT.): 1-5 SAMPLE NUMBER: B-1 TECHNICIAN: S. Felter SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown sandy silt s(ML) DATE COMPLETED: 12/27/2019 TEST SPECIMEN a b c MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 12.9 13.4 13.8 HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches 2.40 2.52 2.60 DRY DENSITY, pcf 114.8 114.7 110.1 COMPACTOR PRESSURE, psi 350 350 300 EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi 594 434 277 EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4 58 39 30 STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi) 35 37 41 TURNS DISPLACEMENT 5.34 5.50 5.57 R-VALUE UNCORRECTED 63 60 57 R-VALUE CORRECTED 61 60 59 DESIGN CALCULATION DATA a b c GRAVEL EQUIVALENT FACTOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 TRAFFIC INDEX 5.0 5.0 5.0 STABILOMETER THICKNESS, ft. 0.62 0.64 0.66 EXPANSION PRESSURE THICKNESS, ft. 1.93 1.30 1.00 EXPANSION PRESSURE CHART EXUDATION PRESSURE CHART R-VALUE BY EXPANSION: 58 R-VALUE BY EXUDATION: 59 EQUILIBRIUM R-VALUE: 58 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER in feetCOVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION in feet 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0100200300400500600700800R-VALUEEXUDATION PRESSURE (psi) BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBrorororrororororororororrrrrrroooooooooorororrorrrroooroooooooororrrrrorroooooooooooororrooooooooorroroooorroooooorrrooooorooooorooooooooroooooooooooooooooroooooooooooooooooooooownwwnwnwnwnwwnnnnnwnwwwnwwwwnwwnwnnnnnnnnnnnwwwnwwwwwnwnwnnnnnnwnnnnwwwwnwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnwwwnwwwwwwwnnnnnwwwwwwwwwwwnnnwnwnwwwwwwwwwwwwnnwnwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnwwwwwwwwwnwnwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssanananaanannnanaanannnnnnaaanaannnnnnnnnananaaannnnnnnnaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnannnannnnannnannnnnnnnnnnndydydydddyyyydyddydddyyyydyyyydyydddddyyyyyyyyyyyyyddyyyyyyyyydyyydddddyyydyyyydddyyyyyyyyydddddyyyydddyyyydydyyyyyyydddyyydyyyyyyydydyyyyyyyyyyddyyyyyyyyydydddyyyyyyydyyyyyyyddyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssililililliiililllliiiilllliliiilllliiliilllliiillliilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllt ttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt s(s(s(s(((((((s(ssss(((((((sssssss(((((ssss(ssssssssssssss((sss(ss(((((sss(((((((sss((((((sssss((((sss((((((ssss(((ssssssssssssssssss(ssss(((ss((((((ss((((((MLMLMLMMLMMLLLLLMLMLMLMMLMMLLMLLMLLMLMMMMLLLMLMMMMLMLLLLMLMMMMMMLMLLLLLMMMMMMMLLMLLLLLMMMMMMMMMLLLMLLMLMMMLMLMMLLLLMLMMMMLMLLLMMMLMMLLMLLMMLLMLMMMMMLLLMMLMMMLMLMMMMMMLMMMMLMMMMMLLMMMMMMLMMMMMMLMMMLMMMMMLMMMMMLLLMMMMMMMMLLLMMMMLM) APPENDIX C GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX C LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Appendix C Page C-1.0 GENERAL ........................................................................................................... 1 C-1.1 Intent ............................................................................................................. 1 C-1.2 Role of Leighton Consulting, Inc. ................................................................... 1 C-1.3 The Earthwork Contractor ............................................................................. 1 C-2.0 PREPARATION OF AREAS TO BE FILLED ..................................................... 2 C-2.1 Clearing and Grubbing .................................................................................. 2 C-2.2 Processing ..................................................................................................... 3 C-2.3 Overexcavation ............................................................................................. 3 C-2.4 Benching ....................................................................................................... 3 C-2.5 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas .............................................................. 3 C-3.0 FILL MATERIAL ................................................................................................. 4 C-3.1 Fill Quality ...................................................................................................... 4 C-3.2 Oversize ........................................................................................................ 4 C-3.3 Import ............................................................................................................ 4 C-4.0 FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION ........................................................... 4 C-4.1 Fill Layers ...................................................................................................... 4 C-4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning .............................................................................. 5 C-4.3 Compaction of Fill .......................................................................................... 5 C-4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes .............................................................................. 5 C-4.5 Compaction Testing ...................................................................................... 5 C-4.6 Compaction Test Locations ........................................................................... 5 C-5.0 EXCAVATION ..................................................................................................... 6 C-6.0 TRENCH BACKFILLS ........................................................................................ 6 C-6.1 Safety ............................................................................................................ 6 C-6.2 Bedding and Backfill ...................................................................................... 6 C-6.3 Lift Thickness ................................................................................................ 7 C-1 C -1.0 GENERAL C-1.1 Intent These Earthwork and Grading Guide Specifications are for grading and earthwork shown on the current, approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the Leighton Consulting, Inc. geotechnical report(s). These Guide Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the project-specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these Guide Specifications. Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall provide geotechnical observation and testing during earthwork and grading. Based on these observations and tests, Leighton Consulting, Inc. may provide new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). C-1.2 Role of Leighton Consulting, Inc. Prior to commencement of earthwork and grading, Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall meet with the earthwork contractor to review the earthwork contractor’s work plan, to schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping and compaction testing. During earthwork and grading, Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall observe, map, and document subsurface exposures to verify geotechnical design assumptions. If observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate changes in design to accommodate these observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested include (1) natural ground after clearing to receiving fill but before fill is placed, (2) bottoms of all "remedial removal" areas, (3) all key bottoms, and (4) benches made on sloping ground to receive fill. Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall observe moisture-conditioning and processing of the subgrade and fill materials, and perform relative compaction testing of fill to determine the attained relative compaction. Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall provide Daily Field Reports to the owner and the Contractor on a routine and frequent basis. C-1.3 The Earthwork Contractor The earthwork contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture-conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Guide Leighton Consulting, Inc. Earthwork and Grading Guide Specifications C-2 Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing grading and backfilling in accordance with the current, approved plans and specifications. The Contractor shall inform the owner and Leighton Consulting, Inc. of changes in work schedules at least one working day in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that Leighton Consulting, Inc. is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish earthwork and grading in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Guide Specifications, and recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of Leighton Consulting, Inc., unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisture condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that earthwork and grading be stopped until unsatisfactory condition(s) are rectified. C -2.0 PREPARATION OF AREAS TO BE FILLED C-2.1 Clearing and Grubbing Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies and Leighton Consulting, Inc.. Care should be taken not to encroach upon or otherwise damage native and/or historic trees designated by the Owner or appropriate agencies to remain. Pavements, flatwork or other construction should not extend under the “drip line” of designated trees to remain. Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 3 percent of organic materials (by dry weight: ASTM D 2974). Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that Leighton Consulting, Inc. Earthwork and Grading Guide Specifications C-3 are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. C-2.2 Processing Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill, by Leighton Consulting, Inc., shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches (15 cm). Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be over-excavated as specified in the following Section C-2.3. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. C-2.3 Overexcavation In addition to removals and over-excavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic- rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be over-excavated to competent ground as evaluated by Leighton Consulting, Inc. during grading. All undocumented fill soils under proposed structure footprints should be excavated C-2.4 Benching Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), (>20 percent grade) the ground shall be stepped or benched. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet (4.5 m) wide and at least 2 feet (0.6 m) deep, into competent material as evaluated by Leighton Consulting, Inc.. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet (1.2 m) into competent material or as otherwise recommended by Leighton Consulting, Inc.. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), (<20 percent grade) shall also be benched or otherwise over-excavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. C-2.5 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by Leighton Consulting, Inc. as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance (Daily Field Report) from Leighton Consulting, Inc. prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys and benches. Leighton Consulting, Inc. Earthwork and Grading Guide Specifications C-4 C -3.0 FILL MATERIAL C-3.1 Fill Quality Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by Leighton Consulting, Inc. prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to Leighton Consulting, Inc. or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. C-3.2 Oversize Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 6 inches (15 cm), shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials and placement methods are specifically accepted by Leighton Consulting, Inc.. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 feet (3 m) measured vertically from finish grade, or within 2 feet (0.61 m) of future utilities or underground construction. C-3.3 Import If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section C-3.1, and be free of hazardous materials (“contaminants”) and rock larger than 3-inches (8 cm) in largest dimension. All import soils shall have an Expansion Index (EI) of 20 or less and a sulfate content no greater than (≤) 500 parts- per-million (ppm). A representative sample of a potential import source shall be given to Leighton Consulting, Inc. at least four full working days before importing begins, so that suitability of this import material can be determined and appropriate tests performed. C -4.0 FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION C-4.1 Fill Layers Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill, as described in Section C-2.0, above, in near-horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches (20 cm) in loose thickness. Leighton Consulting, Inc. may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers, and only if the building officials with the appropriate jurisdiction approve. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. Leighton Consulting, Inc. Earthwork and Grading Guide Specifications C-5 C-4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 1557. C-4.3 Compaction of Fill After each layer has been moisture-conditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, each layer shall be uniformly compacted to not-less-than (≥) 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557. In some cases, structural fill may be specified (see project-specific geotechnical report) to be uniformly compacted to at- least (≥) 95 percent of the ASTM D 1557 modified Proctor laboratory maximum dry density. For fills thicker than (>) 15 feet (4.5 m), the portion of fill deeper than 15 feet below proposed finish grade shall be compacted to 95 percent of the ASTM D 1557 laboratory maximum density. Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. C-4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by back rolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet (1 to 1.2 m) in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to Leighton Consulting, Inc.. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of the ASTM D 1557 laboratory maximum density. C-4.5 Compaction Testing Field-tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by Leighton Consulting, Inc.. Location and frequency of tests shall be at our field representative(s) discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). C-4.6 Compaction Test Locations Leighton Consulting, Inc. shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each density test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that Leighton Leighton Consulting, Inc. Earthwork and Grading Guide Specifications C-6 Consulting, Inc. can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. Adequate grade stakes shall be provided. C - 5 .0 EXCAVATION Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by Leighton Consulting, Inc. during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by Leighton Consulting, Inc. based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, then observed and reviewed by Leighton Consulting, Inc. prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by Leighton Consulting, Inc. C - 6 .0 TRENCH BACKF IL L S C-6.1 Safety The Contractor shall follow all OSHA and Cal/OSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. Work should be performed in accordance with Article 6 of the California Construction Safety Orders, 2009 Edition or more current (see also: http://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/sb4a6.html ). C-6.2 Bedding and Backfill All utility trench bedding and backfill shall be performed in accordance with applicable provisions of the 2018 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book). Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). Bedding shall be placed to 1-foot (0.3 m) over the top of the conduit, and densified by jetting in areas of granular soils, if allowed by the permitting agency. Otherwise, the pipe-bedding zone should be backfilled with Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) consisting of at least one sack of Portland cement per cubic-yard of sand, and conforming to Section 201-6 of the 2018 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book). Backfill over the bedding zone shall be placed and densified mechanically to a minimum of 90 percent of relative compaction (ASTM D 1557) from 1 foot (0.3 m) above the top of the conduit to the surface. Backfill above the pipe zone shall not be jetted. Jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by Leighton Consulting, Inc. and backfill above the pipe zone (bedding) shall be observed and tested by Leighton Consulting, Inc.. Leighton Consulting, Inc. Earthwork and Grading Guide Specifications C-7 C-6.3 Lift Thickness Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to Leighton Consulting, Inc. that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method, and only if the building officials with the appropriate jurisdiction approve. Vertebrate Paleontology Section Telephone: (213) 763-3325 Fax: (213) 746-7431 e-mail: smcleod@nhm.org 26 December 2013 CAJA Environmental Services, LLC 11990 West San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Attn: Seth Wulkan, Assistant Project Manager re:Paleontological resources for the proposed 1100 Town and Country Road Project, in the City of Orange, Orange County, project area Dear Seth: I have conducted a thorough search of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen data for the proposed 1100 Town and Country Road Project, in the City of Orange, Orange County, project area as outlined on the portion of the Orange USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on 27 November 2013. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie within the project boundaries, but we do have localities nearby from the same sedimentary units that occur as subsurface deposits in the proposed project area. Surficial sediments in all of the proposed project area and in the surrounding vicinity consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary Alluvium, primarily as flood deposits from the Santiago Creek just to the south or the Santa Ana River to the west, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths. These younger Quaternary deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils, at least in the uppermost layers, but we have a vertebrate fossil locality, LACM 1652, along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue due north of the proposed project area, that produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. Our closest fossil locality in older Quaternary sediments is LACM 4943, situated almost due east of locality LACM 1652 along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street east of the Santa Ana River, that produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8-10 feet below the surface. Shallow excavations in the uppermost layers of the younger Quaternary alluvial sediments in the proposed project site area are unlikely to uncover significant fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations at the proposed project site area, however, may well encounter significant vertebrate fossils in older Quaternary sediments. Any substantial excavations below the uppermost layers, therefore, should be closely monitored to quickly and professionally collect any specimens without impeding development. Any fossils recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations. This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of the proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential on-site survey. Sincerely, Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. Vertebrate Paleontology enclosure: invoice APPENDIX F • Phase I ESA • Limited Phase II ESA PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 574 SOUTH GLASSELL STREET, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: KSL COMMUNITIES ASK LLC 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No. 12137.001 October 24, 2018 October 24, 2018 Project No. 12137.001 KSL Communities ASK LLC 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Axel Guerra Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 574 South Glassell Street Orange, California Leighton Consulting, Inc. (Leighton) is pleased to present this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report for the property located at 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, California (subject site). Leighton declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 312, and the ASTM International (ASTM) Standard E1527-13. Leighton has the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject site. Leighton has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. If you have questions regarding this report, please contact us. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to KSL Communities ASK LLC. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Brynn McCulloch, PG 8798 Associate Geologist BFM Distribution: (1 PDF) Addressee Project No. 12137.001 - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Authorization ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Scope of Work ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Significant Assumptions .................................................................................... 2 1.5 Limitations and Exceptions ................................................................................ 2 1.6 Special Terms and Conditions .......................................................................... 3 1.7 User Reliance .................................................................................................... 4 1.8 Important Information about Geoenvironmental Reports .................................. 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Location and Legal Description ......................................................................... 5 2.2 Subject Site Vicinity General Characteristics .................................................... 5 2.3 Current Use of the Subject Site ......................................................................... 5 2.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads and Other Improvements on the Property .. 5 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ................................................................ 6 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ............................................................................ 7 3.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ........................................ 7 3.2 Specialized Knowledge ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ........................... 7 3.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ................................................. 7 3.5 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information ..................................... 7 3.6 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA ................................................................. 8 3.7 Other .................................................................................................................. 8 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Physical Setting Source(s) ................................................................................ 9 4.1.1 Topography ............................................................................................ 9 4.1.2 Surface Water ........................................................................................ 9 4.1.3 Geology and Soils .................................................................................. 9 4.1.4 Hydrogeology ......................................................................................... 9 4.1.5 Oil and Gas Fields ................................................................................ 10 4.2 Standard Environmental Record Sources ....................................................... 10 Project No. 12137.001 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page - ii - 4.2.1 Subject Site .......................................................................................... 10 4.2.2 Offsite ................................................................................................... 10 4.2.3 Vapor Encroachment ........................................................................... 13 4.2.4 Regulatory Agency Contacts ............................................................... 13 4.2.5 Other Reports ....................................................................................... 14 4.3 Historical Use Information on the Property...................................................... 14 4.3.1 Aerial Photographs ............................................................................... 14 4.3.2 Historical Topographic Maps ............................................................... 15 4.3.3 Fire Insurance Maps ............................................................................ 16 4.3.4 Historical City Directories ..................................................................... 16 4.3.5 Building Department Records .............................................................. 17 4.3.6 Other Historical Sources ...................................................................... 17 4.3.7 Summary of Historical Land Use ......................................................... 18 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................ 19 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ............................................................. 19 5.2 General Property Setting ................................................................................. 19 5.3 Exterior and Interior Observations ................................................................... 19 5.3.1 Hazardous Substances, Drums, and Other Chemical Containers ....... 19 5.3.2 Storage Tanks ...................................................................................... 19 5.3.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ....................................................... 20 5.3.4 Waste Disposal .................................................................................... 20 5.3.5 Dumping ............................................................................................... 20 5.3.6 Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, Septic Systems, Wastewater, Drains, Cisterns, and Sumps ...................................................................................................... 20 5.3.7 Pesticide Use ....................................................................................... 20 5.3.8 Staining, Discolored Soils, Corrosion ................................................... 20 5.3.9 Stressed Vegetation ............................................................................. 20 5.3.10 Unusual Odors ..................................................................................... 21 5.3.11 Onsite Wells ......................................................................................... 21 5.3.12 Other Observations ............................................................................. 21 6.0 INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................................ 22 6.1 Interview with Owner ....................................................................................... 22 Project No. 12137.001 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page - iii - 6.2 Interview with Property Manager ..................................................................... 22 6.3 Interviews with Occupants ............................................................................... 22 6.4 Interviews with Local Government Officials..................................................... 22 6.5 Interviews with Others ..................................................................................... 22 7.0 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................. 23 7.1 Onsite .............................................................................................................. 23 7.2 Offsite .............................................................................................................. 23 7.3 Data Gaps ....................................................................................................... 24 8.0 OPINION ................................................................................................................... 25 8.1 Onsite .............................................................................................................. 25 8.2 Offsite .............................................................................................................. 25 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... 26 10.0 DEVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 27 11.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES .......................................................................................... 28 12.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ............................... 29 12.1 Corporate ......................................................................................................... 29 12.2 Individual ......................................................................................................... 29 12.3 Environmental Professional Statement ........................................................... 29 List of Accompanying Illustrations and Appendices Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2 – Site Plan Appendix A – References Appendix B – Site Reconnaissance Photos Appendix C – Interview Forms Appendix D – Environmental Lien and AUL Search Report Appendix E – Environmental Radius Report and Vapor Encroachment Screen Appendix F – Historical Research Documentation Appendix G – GBA Geoenvironmental Report Project No. 12137.001 - 1 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Authorization Leighton Consulting, Inc. (Leighton) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located at 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, Orange County, California (subject site – Figure 1) in accordance with the authorization of KSL Communities ASK LLC (KSL). 1.2 Purpose The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible and pursuant to the processes prescribed in ASTM International (ASTM) E1527-13, recognized environmental conditions (RECs), historical RECs (HRECs), or controlled RECs (CRECs) in connection with the subject site. RECs are defined, according to ASTM E1527-13 as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not RECs.” HRECs are defined, according to ASTM E1527-13 as “a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls.” CRECs are defined, according to ASTM E1527-13 as “a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.” (ASTM E1527-13, 2013). Project No. 12137.001 - 2 - 1.3 Scope of Work The scope of work was performed in accordance with Leighton’s proposal dated August 13, 2018 and included the following tasks: A reconnaissance-level visit of the subject site for evidence of the release(s) of hazardous materials and petroleum products and to assess the potential for onsite releases of hazardous materials and petroleum products; Records review (including review of previous environmental reports, selected governmental databases, and historical review); Interviews; and Preparation of this report presenting our findings. 1.4 Significant Assumptions Leighton assumes that the purpose of this Phase I ESA is to provide appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and use of the subject site so that the Client may qualify for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) landowner liability protections as defined in CERCLA, 42 USC §9601(35)(B). Leighton also assumes that the information provided by the Client and its agents, regulatory database provider, and regulatory agencies is true and reliable. 1.5 Limitations and Exceptions Leighton performed the Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E1527-13 of the subject site. Other than the non-scope items shown in Section 1.6 that were not applicable, there were no exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice. Property specific activities performed by Leighton and information collected regarding these activities are summarized within this report. The findings of the Phase I ESA are presented in Section 7.0. Opinions, and conclusions drawn by Leighton, based on the information collected as part of the Phase I ESA, are presented in Sections 8.0 and 9.0, respectively. References are included as Appendix A. Subject site photographs are presented in Appendix B. Completed interview forms are included as Appendix C. The Environmental Lien and Project No. 12137.001 - 3 - Activities and Use Limitations (AUL) Search report is included in Appendix D. The Environmental Radius Report and Vapor Encroachment Screen are included as Appendix E. Historical documentation is provided in Appendix F. This Phase I ESA was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. The observations and conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based on the scope of activities, work schedule, and information obtained through the Phase I ESA described herein. Opinions presented herein apply to property conditions existing at the time of our study and cannot necessarily be taken to apply to property conditions or changes that we are not aware of or have not had the opportunity to evaluate. It must be recognized that conclusions drawn from these data are limited to the amount, type, distribution, and integrity of the information collected at the time of the investigation, the methods utilized to collect and evaluate the data, and that a full and complete determination of environmental risks cannot be made. Although Leighton has taken steps to obtain true copies of available information, we make no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of this information. This practice does not address whether requirements in addition to all appropriate inquiry have been met in order to qualify for the landowner liability protections including the continuing obligation not to impede the integrity and effectiveness of activity and use limitations, or the duty to take reasonable steps to prevent releases, or the duty to comply with legally required release reporting obligations. Users should also be aware that there are likely to be other legal obligations with regard to hazardous substances or petroleum products discovered on the subject site that are not addressed in this practice and that may pose risks of civil and/or criminal sanctions for non-compliance. 1.6 Special Terms and Conditions The scope of work for this Phase I ESA did not include testing of electrical equipment for the presence of PCBs or collection of other environmental samples such as soil, groundwater, air, building materials, paint, or other media; assessment of natural hazards such as naturally occurring asbestos, radon gas or methane gas; assessment of the potential presence of radionuclides; or Project No. 12137.001 - 4 - assessment of nonchemical hazards such as the potential for damage from earthquakes or floods, or the presence of endangered species or wildlife habitats. This Phase I ESA also did not include an extensive assessment of the environmental compliance status of the subject site or of businesses operating at the subject site. 1.7 User Reliance This report is for the exclusive use of KSL. Use of this report by any other party shall be at such party’s sole risk. 1.8 Important Information about Geoenvironmental Reports KSL is referred to Appendix G regarding important information provided by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) on geoenvironmental studies and reports. Project No. 12137.001 - 5 - 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location and Legal Description The subject site is located on the west side of South Glassell Street, approximately 140 feet south of the intersection with East River Avenue, at the address of 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, Orange County, California (Figure 1). The Orange County Assessor’s office designated the subject site as Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 390-591-19. A legal description for the subject site is included in the Environmental Lien and AUL Search Report attached in Appendix D. 2.2 Subject Site Vicinity General Characteristics The subject site vicinity is generally developed for residential use. A church and school border the property to the north and west. 2.3 Current Use of the Subject Site The subject site is an approximately 0.85-acre rectangular lot that is currently occupied by a restaurant and associated parking lot (Appendix B, Photos 1 through 10). 2.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads and Other Improvements on the Property The subject site is developed with one, approximately 5,900-square foot, single- story building and an asphalt-paved parking lot. The building was constructed circa 1960. The following utilities provide service to the subject site. Natural Gas: Southern California Gas Company Source of Potable Water: City of Orange Electric: Southern California Edison Sewage Disposal: City of Orange Solid Waste Disposal: CR&R Project No. 12137.001 - 6 - 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties The subject site is bordered to the east by South Glassell Street, followed by residential properties; to the south by Park Plaza, an existing senior assisted living center; and to the north and west by the Holy Family Cathedral Church and school. Project No. 12137.001 - 7 - 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION The user of this Phase I ESA is identified as KSL. As a part of the ASTM E1527-13 process, Mr. Axel Guerra of KSL, completed a questionnaire for the subject site. A copy of this questionnaire is provided in Appendix C. 3.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations Mr. Guerra indicated that he was not aware of environmental liens or AULs filed or recorded for the subject site. No environmental liens or AULs were identified in the Environmental Lien and AUL Search report provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), dated September 17, 2018. A copy of the Environmental Lien and AUL Search report is included in Appendix D. 3.2 Specialized Knowledge Mr. Guerra acknowledged that KSL currently operates the senior living community adjacent to the south of the subject site. Mr. Guerra had no other specialized knowledge or experience with the subject site or nearby properties. 3.3 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Mr. Guerra was not aware of any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information related to the subject site. 3.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues Mr. Guerra indicated that the purchase price being paid for the subject site is based on fair market value. 3.5 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information According to the Environmental Lien and AUL Search report, the subject site is currently owned and managed by Xiang Hue and Tsuai Ling Zhang Trustees Ben Jong and Ruby H. Tzou. The subject site is occupied by the Yen Ching restaurant. Project No. 12137.001 - 8 - 3.6 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA According to Mr. Guerra, the reason for requesting this Phase I ESA is for due diligence purposes related to the purchase of the subject site. 3.7 Other No other information was provided by Mr. Guerra. Project No. 12137.001 - 9 - 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Physical Setting Source(s) Leighton reviewed pertinent maps and readily available literature for information on the physiography and hydrogeology of the subject site. A summary of this information is presented in the following subsections. 4.1.1 Topography The subject site is located in Section 31 of Township 4 South, Range 9 West of the San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. Topographic map coverage of the subject site vicinity is provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Orange, California Quadrangle (2012). The elevation of the subject site is approximately 185 feet above mean sea level and the topography is relatively flat. 4.1.2 Surface Water Surface water was not observed on the subject site or adjacent properties. Santiago Creek is located approximately 645 feet south of the subject site. 4.1.3 Geology and Soils The subject site is located in the southeast portion of the Los Angeles Basin, near the northwestern edge of the Santa Ana Mountains. The Los Angeles Basin is a structural depression in which a thick sequence of marine sediments has accumulated since late Miocene time. The subject site is generally underlain in the near surface by Holocene and Pleistocene alluvial deposits consisting of sands and gravels with less common silts and clays. The depth to sedimentary bedrock is expected to be greater than 980 feet. 4.1.4 Hydrogeology The subject site is located within the Coastal Plain of Orange County Groundwater Basin, underlying the lower Santa Ana Watershed. The principal water-bearing formations of the Coastal Plain of Orange County are dominated by a deep structural depression containing a thick Project No. 12137.001 - 10 - accumulation of fresh water-bearing interbedded marine and continental sand, silt and clay deposits (CDWR 1967). Geotracker, a State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) online data warehouse which tracks regulatory data about underground fuel tanks, fuel pipelines, and public drinking water supplies, was reviewed regarding reported depths to groundwater in the vicinity. Groundwater in the vicinity of the subject site was reported at a depth greater than 90 feet below ground surface (bgs). The actual flow direction of groundwater beneath the subject site is not known; however, based on the surface topography in the subject site vicinity, the flow direction of groundwater is inferred to be generally toward the southwest. 4.1.5 Oil and Gas Fields Leighton reviewed the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), Online Mapping System, on August 15, 2018. Evidence of oil wells or oil field-related facilities was not indicated on the subject site or within 0.25-miles of the subject site: 4.2 Standard Environmental Record Sources A search of selected government databases was conducted by Leighton using the EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck® environmental database report system. Details and descriptions of the database search are provided in the EDR database report. The database report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The database listings were reviewed within the specified radii established by the ASTM E1527- 13. A copy of this report is included in Appendix E. 4.2.1 Subject Site The subject site was not identified in the EDR database report. 4.2.2 Offsite Information in the EDR database report was reviewed for facilities of potential environmental concern to the subject site. Additionally, the Project No. 12137.001 - 11 - SWRCB Geotracker website and DTSC Envirostor website were used to supplement the information in the EDR database report. The database search results for offsite properties, including those found within the “orphaned” unmapped listings, with potential to adversely impact the subject site are listed in the table below: Project No. 12137.001 - 12 - Table 1 - Databases Searched Database Search Distance (radius) Properties of Potential Concern Federal NPL List 1.0-mile No Delisted NPL List 1.0-mile No Federal CERCLIS List 0.5-mile No CERCLIS – No Further Action 0.5-mile No CORRACTS 1.0-mile Yes (1) Federal RCRA TSDF List 0.5-mile Yes (1) RCRA Generators List 0.25-mile Yes (2) US ENG Controls List 0.5-miles No US INST Controls List 0.5-mile No US Brownfields 0.5-mile No Historic CAL-Sites 1.0-mile No SWRCY 0.5-mile No Response 1.0-mile No Envirostor 1.0-mile Yes (5) SCH 0.25-mile No SWF/LF Facilities 0.5-mile No LUST Facilities 0.5-mile Yes (4) CAL FID UST 0.25-mile Yes (1) SLIC 0.5-mile No UST 0.25-mile Yes (2) Historical UST 0.25-mile Yes (3) AST 0.25-mile No SWEEPS UST 0.25-mile Yes (1) DEED 0.5-mile No VCP 0.5-mile No Drycleaners 0.25-mile No Indian RESERV 1.0-mile No Indian LUST 0.5-mile No Indian UST 0.25-mile No EDR Manufactured Gas Plants 1.0-mile Yes (1) EDR Historical Auto Stations 0.25-mile Yes (1) EDR Historical Cleaners 0.25-mile No See EDR Radius Report (Appendix E) for list of acronyms and data sources Project No. 12137.001 - 13 - The listings identified in the EDR database report were reviewed and not interpreted to represent an adverse effect to the subject site at the time of this report preparation based on one or more of the following: Type of release (soil only); Closure received from regulatory agency; Distance of the facility to the subject site; and Direction of groundwater flow (southwest) and location of the facility to the subject site (cross-gradient or down-gradient). 4.2.3 Vapor Encroachment Leighton reviewed the Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) produced using EDR’s Vapor Encroachment Worksheet application that gathers regulatory database information from the accompanying Radius Report and allows the user to integrate groundwater information, regional geology, and other information to evaluate the concern for potential vapor encroachment from onsite activities and from adjacent properties. The VES application was designed by EDR to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of the ASTM Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Encroachment into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions (E2600-10), also referred to as the Tier 1 VES, as defined by ASTM E2600-10. Using the VES application, no offsite properties with potential to impact the subject site were identified; therefore, vapor encroachment is not considered a REC. A copy of the VES report has been included as Appendix E. 4.2.4 Regulatory Agency Contacts On September 12, 2018, Leighton requested regulatory records for the address associated with the subject site. The following agencies were contacted or their respective online databases were researched: DTSC (Cypress and Chatsworth offices); Santa Ana Reginal Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB); Project No. 12137.001 - 14 - City of Orange Fire Department (OFD); Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA); and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Records were not found for the subject site at the DTSC, SARWQCB, OCHCA, and SCAQMD. As of the date of this report, a response has not yet been received from the OFD. Any response altering the conclusions and recommendations of this report will be forwarded in the form of an addendum. National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Leighton reviewed records posted on the National Pipeline Mapping System’s NPMS Public Map Viewer on August 15, 2018. No pipelines containing hazardous liquids were shown on or adjacent to the subject site (NPMS, 2018). 4.2.5 Other Reports No other reports were reviewed in preparation of this Phase I ESA. 4.3 Historical Use Information on the Property Leighton reviewed selected historical information on the subject site. These references were reviewed for evidence of activities, which would suggest the presence of hazardous substances at the subject site and to evaluate the potential for the subject site to be impacted by offsite sources of contamination. The following paragraphs are a chronological summary of the review. 4.3.1 Aerial Photographs Historical aerial photographs were reviewed for information regarding past subject site uses. Aerial photographs dated 1938, 1946, 1952, 1963, 1966, 1972, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1995, 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2016, provided by EDR, were reviewed. Copies of these photographs are included in Appendix F. Project No. 12137.001 - 15 - In the 1938, 1946, and 1952 aerial photographs, the subject site and surrounding properties to the north, west, and south are observed to be orchards. A structure, possibly the present-day church, is also observed to the north of the subject site. South Glassell Street, followed by residential properties, is observed to the east of the subject site. In the 1963 aerial photograph, the present-day structure is observed in the eastern portion of the subject site. The western portion of the subject site is observed to be a parking lot. What appears to be an adjoining miniature golf course (Holo Wai Miniature Golf) is observed to the south of the subject site and it appears to be associated with the onsite parking lot and structure. The present-day Holy Family Cathedral Church and school are observed to the north and west of the subject site. Land use changes are not observed on the surrounding properties to the east. In the 1966, 1972, 1977, and 1985 aerial photographs, significant land use changes are not observed on the subject site and surrounding properties. In the 1989 aerial photograph, the subject site is observed to be in its present-day use and configuration. The present-day Park Plaza senior assisted living center is observed to the south of the subject site. Land use changes are not observed on the surrounding properties to the north, west, and east. In the 1995, 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2016 aerial photographs, the subject site and surrounding properties are observed to be in their present-day use and configuration. 4.3.2 Historical Topographic Maps Historical topographic maps provided in the EDR Historical Topographic Map Report were reviewed for information regarding past subject site uses, and include the following quadrangles: Anaheim (1896, 1898, 1901, 1942), Corona (1902), and Orange (1932, 1935, 1949, 1950, 1964, 1972, 1981, and 2012). Copies of these maps are provided in Appendix F. 1896, 1898, 1901, 1902, 1932, and 1935: No structures, tanks, or wells are depicted on the subject site. Scattered residences are depicted in the subject site vicinity. Santiago Creek is depicted to the south of the subject site. Project No. 12137.001 - 16 - 1942, 1949, and 1950: Orchards are depicted on the subject site and surrounding properties to the north, west, and south. One small structure is depicted to the north of the subject site in the 1949 and 1950 topographic maps. South Glassell Street, followed by a red-shaded residential area, is depicted to the east of the subject site. 1964, 1972, and 1981: The present-day structure is depicted in the eastern portion of the subject site. The Holy Family School is depicted to the north and west of the subject site. No structures are depicted to the south of the subject site. South Glassell Street, followed by a red-shaded residential area, is depicted to the east of the subject site. 2012: Only landmark buildings are shown on the topographic map. No buildings are depicted on the subject site and surrounding properties. South Glassell Street is depicted adjacent to the east of the subject site. 4.3.3 Fire Insurance Maps Fire insurance maps, or Sanborn® maps, are detailed city plans showing building footprints, construction details, use of structure, street address, etc. The maps were designed to assist fire insurance agents in determining the degree of hazard associated with a particular property. Sanborn Maps were produced from approximately 1867 to the present for commercial, industrial, and residential sections of approximately 12,000 cities and towns in the United States. Sanborn® Maps were not published for the subject site; however, maps were published for the adjacent properties to the east of the subject site, across South Glassell Street, in 1922, 1929, 1950, and 1954. The adjacent properties to the east of the subject site are depicted as residential properties in each Sanborn® Map. No properties of environmental concern were noted. 4.3.4 Historical City Directories City Directories have been published for cities and towns across the US since the 1700s. Originally a list of residents, the City Directory developed into a tool for locating individuals and businesses in particular. For each street address listed, the directory recorded the name of the resident or business that operated from this addresses. While City Directory Project No. 12137.001 - 17 - coverage is usually comprehensive for major cities, it may be sporadic for rural areas and small towns. The purpose of the City Directory research was to attempt to determine the businesses that were historically located at the subject site and adjacent addresses. Leighton reviewed the EDR City Directory Abstract dated September 10, 2018 (Appendix F). Records were reviewed from 1920 to 2014 at approximate 5-year intervals. The subject site was identified in the city directory search as the following occupant: Occupant Year(s) Kims Family Restaurant, Mr. K Restaurant & Buffeteria 1965 Mr. T Cleaners, Mr. T Restaurant 1966 Villa Sweden Restaurant 1975 Yen Ching Restaurant 1980, 1991, 2005, 2010, and 2014 Several residences were listed for the surrounding properties. No surrounding properties of concern were included in the city directory report. 4.3.5 Building Department Records Leighton reviewed the EDR City Directory Abstract dated September 10, 2018 (Appendix F). No permits of environmental concern were noted in the report. 4.3.6 Other Historical Sources Other historical sources were not reviewed as a part of this Phase I ESA. Project No. 12137.001 - 18 - 4.3.7 Summary of Historical Land Use Based on historical records, land usage is summarized as follows: Time Period Land Usage Reference Prior to 1896 Unknown None Available Approximately 1898 to 1938 Vacant, undeveloped land Aerial Photographs Topographic Maps Approximately 1938 to 1960 Orchards Aerial Photographs Topographic Maps Approximately 1960 to 1986 Restaurant and Clubhouse of adjacent Holo Wai Miniature Golf course Aerial Photographs Topographic Maps City Directories Approximately 1986 to present Restaurant Site Reconnaissance Aerial Photographs Topographic Maps City Directories Project No. 12137.001 - 19 - 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions On September 14, 2018, a representative of Leighton conducted a reconnaissance–level assessment of the subject site, which consisted of observing and documenting existing conditions of the subject site and nature of the neighboring development. Photographs of the subject site are presented in Appendix B and their view directions are noted on Figure 2. Items noted during the subject site reconnaissance are also depicted on Figure 2. 5.2 General Property Setting The subject site vicinity is generally developed for residential use. A church and school border the property to the north and west. The subject site is an approximately 0.85-acre rectangular lot that is currently occupied by a restaurant and associated parking lot (Appendix B, Photos 1 through 10). The subject site is developed with one, approximately 5,900-square foot, single-story building and an asphalt-paved parking lot. The building was constructed circa 1960. 5.3 Exterior and Interior Observations 5.3.1 Hazardous Substances, Drums, and Other Chemical Containers Other than small quantities (less than 5 gallons) of general cleaning supplies, no hazardous substance, drums, or other chemical containers were observed onsite. 5.3.2 Storage Tanks Evidence of underground storage tanks (USTs) (such as vent lines, fill or overfill ports) and/or aboveground storage tanks was not observed on the subject site. Project No. 12137.001 - 20 - 5.3.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) No transformers or other equipment containing PCBs were observed onsite. 5.3.4 Waste Disposal General waste is stored in bins located in the southwest corner of the subject site and is regularly removed from the site by the CR&R. 5.3.5 Dumping Evidence of active dumping was not observed on the subject site. 5.3.6 Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, Septic Systems, Wastewater, Drains, Cisterns, and Sumps One in-floor grease trap was observed within the kitchen portion of the onsite building. Food grade grease was observed within the grease trap. The grease trap is not considered a REC associated with the subject site. Several floor drains were located in the kitchen portion of the onsite building. The drains appeared to be free of oil or other hazardous substances. Evidence of pits, ponds, lagoons, septic systems, cisterns, and sumps was not observed on the subject site. 5.3.7 Pesticide Use Evidence of pesticide use was not observed on the subject site. 5.3.8 Staining, Discolored Soils, Corrosion Stained, discolored soil or evidence of corrosion was not observed on the subject site. 5.3.9 Stressed Vegetation Evidence of stressed vegetation was not observed on the subject site. Project No. 12137.001 - 21 - 5.3.10 Unusual Odors Unusual odors were not detected on the subject site. 5.3.11 Onsite Wells Oil, gas production, or water wells were not observed on the subject site. 5.3.12 Other Observations An abandoned grease trap or other piece of kitchen equipment was located in the southwest corner of the subject site, near the onsite dumpsters. This equipment is not considered a REC associated with the subject site. Project No. 12137.001 - 22 - 6.0 INTERVIEWS Leighton conducted interviews with persons having knowledge of current or past subject site usage. Interviews were conducted either orally or in the form of a written questionnaire. Written responses, if any, are included as Appendix C. 6.1 Interview with Owner An owner interview form was forwarded to the current owner of the subject site on September 14, 2018. As of the date of this report, a completed interview form has not yet been received by Leighton. 6.2 Interview with Property Manager The current property manager was not interviewed as part of this Phase I ESA. 6.3 Interviews with Occupants Current restaurant employees were not interviewed as part of this Phase I ESA. 6.4 Interviews with Local Government Officials Leighton did not interview employees with local government agencies to request information regarding historic and current uses of the subject site with the exception of those noted in Section 4.2. 6.5 Interviews with Others Leighton did not conduct additional interviews for this Phase I ESA. Project No. 12137.001 - 23 - 7.0 FINDINGS Leighton performed a Phase I ESA of the property located at 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, Orange County, California (subject site – Figure 1) in accordance with KSL’s authorization. 7.1 Onsite Historically, the subject site was orchards from at least 1938 until approximately 1960, when the present-day building was constructed onsite. The structure housed a restaurant and the clubhouse associated with the adjacent Holo Wai Miniature Golf Course, located to the south of the subject site. The adjacent miniature golf course closed in the mid-1980s, and the subject site remained a restaurant and parking lot. Currently, the subject site is an approximately 0.85-acre rectangular lot that is currently occupied by a restaurant and associated parking lot (Appendix B, Photos 1 through 10). The subject site is developed with one, approximately 5,900-square foot, single-story building and an asphalt-paved parking lot. The building was constructed circa 1960. 7.2 Offsite Historically, the adjacent properties to the north, west, and south were orchards until approximately 1960, when the Holy Family Catherdral Church and school were constructed to the north and west of the subejct site. The Holo Wai Miniatrue Golf course was located to the south of the subject site from approximately 1960 until the mid-1980s. In the mid-1980s, the miniature golf course was demolished and the present-day senior assisted living center was constructed to the south of the subject site. Currently, the subject site is bordered to the east by South Glassell Street, followed by residential properties; to the south by Park Plaza, an existing senior assisted living center; and to the north and west by the Holy Family Cathedral Church and school. No offsite properties with potential to impact the subject site were identified during the completion of this Phase I ESA. Project No. 12137.001 - 24 - 7.3 Data Gaps The following data gaps were identified by Leighton: Completed Owner and User Questionnaires have not been received by Leighton. The OFD has not responded to our request for public records. It is Leighton’s opinion, based on other reasonably obtained data, that this data gap is not significant to identifying RECs in connection with the subject site. Project No. 12137.001 - 25 - 8.0 OPINION 8.1 Onsite It is Leighton’s opinion that the historic use of the subject site as an orchard presents an environmental concern and is considered a REC. No other RECs were identified for the subject site It is Leighton’s opinion that no CRECs or HRECs were identified for the subject site. 8.2 Offsite No offsite RECs were identified that would negatively impact the subject site. Project No. 12137.001 - 26 - 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Leighton has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E1527-13 of the property located at 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, Orange County, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs, HRECs, or CRECs in connection with the subject site, except for the following: The historic use of the subject site as an orchard from at least 1938 until approximately 1960 and the potential use of pesticides associated with this historic land use. No evidence of CRECs or HRECs was identified for the subject site. Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA, Leighton recommends the following: Collect soil samples from the subject site to assess the presence of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and arsenic in the near-surface soil. In general, observations should be made during future property development for areas of possible contamination such as, but not limited to, the presence of underground facilities, buried debris, waste drums, and tanks, stained soil or odorous soils. Should such materials be encountered, further investigation and analysis may be necessary at that time. Project No. 12137.001 - 27 - 10.0 DEVIATIONS Leighton did not deviate from or alter the scope of work, as defined in Section 1.3 of this report. Significant data gaps were not identified that affect the ability of Leighton to identify RECs at the subject site. Project No. 12137.001 - 28 - 11.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Leighton did not perform work outside the scope of work as defined in Section 1.3 of this report. Project No. 12137.001 - 29 - 12.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS 12.1 Corporate Leighton is a California corporation, providing geotechnical and environmental consulting services throughout California. We are solely a consulting firm without interests in real property other than our office locations in Southern California. We provide professional environmental consulting services including application of science and engineering to environmental compliance, hazardous materials/waste assessment and cleanup, and management of hazardous, solid and industrial waste. Phase I Environmental Site Assessments are a part of this practice area and have been conducted by us. 12.2 Individual The qualifications of the Associate Geologist and the other Leighton environmental professionals involved in this Phase I ESA meet the Leighton corporate requirements for performing Phase I ESAs as specified by ASTM E1527-13. In addition, Ms. Brynn McCulloch is a Professional Geologist (PG). 12.3 Environmental Professional Statement I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional, as defined by §312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Site. I have developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. _____________________ Brynn McCulloch, PG Associate Geologist ³ 0 2,000 4,000 Feet Figu re 1 Scale: Leighton Base Map : ESRI ArcGIS Online 20 18 Thematic In fo rmation: Leighton 1 " = 2,000 ' Projec t: 12137.001 Eng/Geol: BFM Map S aved as P :\Drafti ng\12137\001 \Maps\12137 -001 _F0 1 _S LM _2 018-09-20.mxd on 9 /2 0/2018 1 :28:08 P M Author: Le ighto n Geomatics (mmurp hy) Date: September 2018 SITE LOCATION MAP574 South Glassell StreetOrange, C alifornia Ap pro ximateSite Loca tion APPENDIX A Project No. 12137.001 A-1 APPENDIX A References ASTM International, 2013, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation E1527-13, dated November 6, 2013 California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, Online Mapping System, Accessed August 15, 2018 Department of Toxic Substances Control, Envirostor Online Database, Accessed August 15, 2018 EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package, September 10, 2018 EDR Building Permit Report, September 10, 2018 EDR Certified Sanborn Map Report, September 10, 2018 EDR City Directory Abstract, September 10, 2018 EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search Report, September 17, 2018 EDR Historical Topographic Map Report, September 10, 2018 EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck®, September 10, 2018 State Water Resources Control Board, Geotracker Online Database, Accessed August 15, 2018 APPENDIX B Leighton Consulting, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD September 14, 2018 Client Name: KSL Site Location: 574 S. Glassell Street, Orange, CA Project No. 12137.001 Photo No. 1 View Direction of Photo: Southwest Description: View of the northeast portion of the subject site. Photo No. 2 View Direction of Photo: Southwest Description: View of the southeast portion of the subject site. Leighton Consulting, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD September 14, 2018 Client Name: KSL Site Location: 574 S. Glassell Street, Orange, CA Project No. 12137.001 Photo No. 3 View Direction of Photo: Southeast Description: View of the western exterior of the onsite structure. Photo No. 4 View Direction of Photo: Northeast Description: View of the southern exterior of the onsite structure. Leighton Consulting, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD September 14, 2018 Client Name: KSL Site Location: 574 S. Glassell Street, Orange, CA Project No. 12137.001 Photo No. 5 View Direction of Photo: East Description: View of the onsite parking lot. Photo No. 6 View Direction of Photo: East Description: View of the onsite parking lot. Leighton Consulting, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD September 14, 2018 Client Name: KSL Site Location: 574 S. Glassell Street, Orange, CA Project No. 12137.001 Photo No. 7 View Direction of Photo: West Description: View of the dumpsters located in the southwest corner of the subject site. Photo No. 8 View Direction of Photo: NA Description: View of the in-floor grease trap located within the kitchen portion of the onsite structure. Leighton Consulting, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD September 14, 2018 Client Name: KSL Site Location: 574 S. Glassell Street, Orange, CA Project No. 12137.001 Photo No. 9 View Direction of Photo: NA Description: View of a floor drain located within the kitchen portion of the onsite structure. Photo No. 10 View Direction of Photo: Northeast Description: View of several small containers of general cleaning supplies located in the southern portion of the onsite structure. APPENDIX C APPENDIX D Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Inquiry Number: 5425269.1 September 17, 2018 EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search The EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search Report provides results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations, such as engineering controls and institutional controls. A network of professional, trained researchers, following established procedures, uses client supplied address information to: • search for parcel information and/or legal description; • search for ownership information; • research official land title documents recorded at jurisdictional agencies such as recorders' offices, registries of deeds, county clerks' offices, etc.; • access a copy of the deed; • search for environmental encumbering instrument(s) associated with the deed; • provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s) based upon a review of key words in the instrument(s) (title, parties involved, and description); and • provide a copy of the deed or cite documents reviewed. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION_______________________________ ADDRESS 574 S. Glassell Street Kisco Glassell Orange, CA 92866 RESEARCH SOURCE Source 1: Orange Recorder Orange, CA PROPERTY INFORMATION Deed 1: Type of Deed:deed Title is vested in:Xiang Hue & Tsuai Ling Zhang Trustees Ben Jong & R Title received from:Nancy Louise Anson Laura Leticia Nisita Cathleen D Deed Dated 11/24/2014 Deed Recorded:12/19/2014 Book:NA Page:na Volume:na Instrument:na Docket:NA Land Record Comments: Miscellaneous Comments: Legal Description:See Exhibit Legal Current Owner:Xiang Hue & Tsuai Ling Zhang Trustees Ben Jong & Ruby H Tzou Parcel # / Property Identifier:390-591-19 Comments:See Exhibit ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN ¨ýEnvironmental Lien:Found Not Found OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (AULs) ¨ýAULs:Found Not Found 5425269.1 Page 1 Deed Exhibit 1 APPENDIX E FORM-LBB-DCA ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Inquiry Number: 5417961.2s September 10, 2018 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 38 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-6 Physical Setting Source Map A-10 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-12 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5417961.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 574 S. GLASSELL STREET ORANGE, CA 92866 COORDINATES 33.7790580 - 33˚ 46’ 44.60’’Latitude (North): 117.8537520 - 117˚ 51’ 13.50’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 420951.4UTM X (Meters): 3737792.5UTM Y (Meters): 185 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5641308 ORANGE, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140514Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 5417961.2s Page 2 21 UNOCAL 2525 NORTH MAIN Notify 65 Lower 4830, 0.915, SW D20 SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MG E OF PIXSLEY BTW CHA EDR MGP Lower 3249, 0.615, NNW D19 SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MG E OF PIXSLEY ST BTW ENVIROSTOR, VCP Lower 3029, 0.574, NNW 18 ACE CLEANERS 2525 NORTH GRAND AVE ENVIROSTOR Lower 2928, 0.555, South C17 AMF NEWPORT DIVERS 426 WEST ALMOND ENVIROSTOR Lower 2566, 0.486, NNW C16 AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND SEMS-ARCHIVE, CORRACTS, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-SQG,... Lower 2566, 0.486, NNW B15 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 2701 N N. GRAND AVE LUST Lower 1974, 0.374, South B14 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 2701 N. GRAND AVE LUST Lower 1929, 0.365, South B13 GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER 2705 GRAND AVE LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1848, 0.350, South 12 CREST CLEANERS 2739 NORTH GRAND AVE ENVIROSTOR Higher 1549, 0.293, South 11 ROBERT J DUNN M D IN 392 S GLASSELL ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1247, 0.236, North A10 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 684 S GLASSELL HIST UST Lower 525, 0.099, South A9 STATION #5299 684 S GLASSELL ST HIST UST Lower 525, 0.099, South A8 DANNYS UNICAL 684 S GLASSELL ST EDR Hist Auto Lower 525, 0.099, South A7 76 STATION 5299 684 GLASSELL LUST Lower 525, 0.099, South A6 CADNICKS 76 255299 684 S GLASSELL ST UST Lower 525, 0.099, South A5 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 684 S GLASSELL SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST Lower 525, 0.099, South A4 DANNYS UNION SERVICE 684 S GLASSELL ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 525, 0.099, South 3 NU-WAY LAUNDRY 302 W LAVETA ST EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 493, 0.093, NW 2 UNOCAZ SS. NO. 5299 684 S. CLASSELL ST. UST Higher 338, 0.064, East 1 SR 22 - FILLING LEWI CIWQS Higher 1 ft. MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 574 S. GLASSELL STREET ORANGE, CA 92866 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site List of Industrial Site Cleanups SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE ICE HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) CERS CERS MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/17/2018 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) C16 22 Site ID: 0900117 EPA Id: CAD049901176 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) C16 22 EPA ID:: CAD049901176 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. A review of the RCRA-TSDF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-TSDF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) C16 22 EPA ID:: CAD049901176 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ROBERT J DUNN M D IN 392 S GLASSELL ST N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.236 mi.) 11 16 EPA ID:: CAD983646316 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DANNYS UNION SERVICE 684 S GLASSELL ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A4 9 EPA ID:: CAD982008815 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/30/2018 has revealed that there are 5 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CREST CLEANERS 2739 NORTH GRAND AVE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.293 mi.) 12 17 Facility Id: 30720012 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) C16 22 Facility Id: 80001403 Status: * Completed AMF NEWPORT DIVERS 426 WEST ALMOND NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) C17 29 Facility Id: 30340005 Status: Refer: Other Agency ACE CLEANERS 2525 NORTH GRAND AVE S 1/2 - 1 (0.555 mi.) 18 30 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Facility Id: 30720004 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MG E OF PIXSLEY ST BTW NNW 1/2 - 1 (0.574 mi.) D19 31 Facility Id: 30490106 Status: Active State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER 2705 GRAND AVE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.350 mi.) B13 18 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Global ID: T0605901721 Facility Status: Case Closed PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 76 STATION 5299 684 GLASSELL S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A7 12 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Database: ORANGE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 05UT004 Global Id: T0605910252 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 2701 N. GRAND AVE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.365 mi.) B14 20 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Global ID: T0605900699 Facility Status: Case Closed EXXON SERVICE STATIO 2701 N N. GRAND AVE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.374 mi.) B15 21 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900699 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ UNOCAZ SS. NO. 5299 684 S. CLASSELL ST. E 0 - 1/8 (0.064 mi.) 2 8 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Facility Id: 30-030-000002 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CADNICKS 76 255299 684 S GLASSELL ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A6 12 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Facility Id: FA0060020 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there is 1 SWEEPS UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ UNION OIL SERVICE ST 684 S GLASSELL S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A5 10 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 17859 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 3 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ UNION OIL SERVICE ST 684 S GLASSELL S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A5 10 STATION #5299 684 S GLASSELL ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A9 15 Facility Id: 00000043675 UNION OIL SERVICE ST 684 S GLASSELL S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A10 15 Facility Id: 00000017859 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there is 1 CA FID UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ UNION OIL SERVICE ST 684 S GLASSELL S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A5 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 Facility Id: 30001592 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there is 1 HIST CORTESE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER 2705 GRAND AVE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.350 mi.) B13 18 Reg Id: 083002400T HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/21/2018 has revealed that there is 1 HWP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.486 mi.) C16 22 EPA Id: CAD049901176 Cleanup Status: NON-OPERATING Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/18/2018 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ UNOCAL 2525 NORTH MAIN SW 1/2 - 1 (0.915 mi.) 21 37 CIWQS: The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. A review of the CIWQS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/04/2018 has revealed that there is 1 CIWQS site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SR 22 - FILLING LEWI 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 1 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. A review of the EDR MGP list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR MGP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MG E OF PIXSLEY BTW CHA NNW 1/2 - 1 (0.615 mi.) D20 36 EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Auto site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DANNYS UNICAL 684 S GLASSELL ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.099 mi.) A8 14 EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ NU-WAY LAUNDRY 302 W LAVETA ST NW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) 3 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5417961.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 There were no unmapped sites in this report. EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 kV 2 001 6 0 1 6 0160160 160160200200200200 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1 NR 0 1 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 2 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 5 NR 2 3 0 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 4 NR NR 3 0 1 0.500LUST TC5417961.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS HAZ WASTE Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250SWEEPS UST 3 NR NR NR 0 3 0.250HIST UST 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250CA FID UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS TANKS Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 TC5417961.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Orange Co. Industrial Site 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings TC5417961.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICE 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 1 NR 0 1 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MILITARY PRIV SITES 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.001CIWQS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC GEO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001OTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NON-CASE INFO EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 28 0 4 11 1 12 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5417961.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.85417Longitude: 33.77917Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: 3TTWQ: CComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: 0Design Flow: 04/15/2020Expiration/Review Date: 12/01/2006Termination Date: 04/15/2005Effective Date: 04/15/2005Adoption Date: Not reportedNPDES Number: 8 303511001WDID: R8-2005-0055Order Number: WDRRegulatory Measure Type: HistoricalRegulatory Measure Status: WDRProgram: 8Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: OtherPlace/Project Type: 550 South Main Street, Orange, CA 92613-1584Agency Address: Orange Cnty Transportation AuthorityAgency: CIWQS: 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 185 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA N/A 1 CIWQSSR 22 - FILLING LEWIS CHANNEL S121676080 -117.8521818Longitude: 33.7788102Latitude: ORANGE, CITY OFPermitting Agency: 30-030-000002Facility ID: UST: 338 ft. 0.064 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 191 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92666 East 684 S. CLASSELL ST. N/A 2 USTUNOCAZ SS. NO. 5299 U003782013 LAUNDRIES1925 NU-WAY LAUNDRY Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Cleaner 493 ft. 0.093 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 185 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA NW 302 W LAVETA ST N/A 3 EDR Hist CleanerNU-WAY LAUNDRY 1009196485 TC5417961.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: DANIEL W LENTZ UNION OILOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-639-6720Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92666 684 S GLASSELLContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD982008815EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92866 684 S GLASSELL STFacility address: DANNYS UNION SERVICEFacility name: 06/26/1987Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 525 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster A 0.099 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. < 1/8 ECHOORANGE, CA 92866 South FINDS684 S GLASSELL ST CAD982008815 A4 RCRA-SQGDANNYS UNION SERVICE 1000323823 TC5417961.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008274508DFR URL: 110008274508Registry ID: 1000323823Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008274508Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: DANNYS UNION SERVICE (Continued) 1000323823 3Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 06-21-93Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-017859-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 06-21-93Action Date: 06-21-93Referral Date: 44-000051Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 17859Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 525 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster A 0.099 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. < 1/8 CA FID USTORANGE, CA 92666 South HIST UST684 S GLASSELL N/A A5 SWEEPS USTUNION OIL SERVICE STATION #529 S101629969 TC5417961.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002D671.pdfURL: 0002D671File Number: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 06-21-93Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-017859-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 06-21-93Action Date: 06-21-93Referral Date: 44-000051Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 17859Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 06-21-93Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-017859-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 06-21-93Action Date: 06-21-93Referral Date: 44-000051Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 17859Comp Number: ActiveStatus: UNION OIL SERVICE STATION #529 (Continued) S101629969 TC5417961.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92666Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 684 S GLASSELLMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146396720Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00017859Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30001592Facility ID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: UNION OIL SERVICE STATION #529 (Continued) S101629969 -117.85353Longitude: 33.77742Latitude: Orange County Environmental HealthPermitting Agency: FA0060020Facility ID: UST: 525 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster A 0.099 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92866 South 684 S GLASSELL ST N/A A6 USTCADNICKS 76 255299 U004264505 Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 05UT004Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: SRCase Worker: 01/11/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.853079Longitude: 33.798452Latitude: T0605910252Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605910252Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 525 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster A 0.099 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92866 South 684 GLASSELL N/A A7 LUST76 STATION 5299 S106875513 TC5417961.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605910252Global Id: 04/04/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605910252Global Id: 03/14/2005Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605910252Global Id: LUST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/14/2005Date: OtherAction Type: T0605910252Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 06/07/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605910252Global Id: Notice of ResponsibilityAction: 04/04/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605910252Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 04/04/2005Date: OtherAction Type: T0605910252Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 01/11/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605910252Global Id: LUST: 7144336262Phone Number: srajagopal@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: SHYAMALA RAJAGOPALContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605910252Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: kwilliams@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: Ken WilliamsContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605910252Global Id: LUST: 76 STATION 5299 (Continued)S106875513 TC5417961.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RO0003336Record ID: 01/11/2006Date Closed: Gasoline-Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleadedReleased Substance: 05UT004Facility Id: ORANGERegion: ORANGE CO. LUST: 01/11/2006Status Date: 76 STATION 5299 (Continued)S106875513 Gasoline Service Stations2014 CADNICKS INC Gasoline Service Stations2013 CADNICKS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2012 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2011 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2010 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2010 JEMS ORANGE 76 Gasoline Service Stations2009 JEMS ORANGE 76 Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2009 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2008 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2008 JEMS ORANGE 76 Gasoline Service Stations2007 JEMS ORANGE 76 Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2006 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2006 JEMS ORANGE 76 Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2005 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations2005 JEMS ORANGE 76 Gasoline Service Stations2003 GAS PROS INC Gasoline Service Stations2002 R & A MALIK INC Gasoline Service Stations2002 GAS PROS INC Gasoline Service Stations2001 R & A MALIK INC Gasoline Service Stations2001 GAS PROS INC Gasoline Service Stations2000 DANNYS UNICAL Gasoline Service Stations1999 DANNYS UNICAL Gasoline Service Stations1998 DANNYS UNICSERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1997 DANNYS UNICAL Gasoline Service Stations1996 DANNYS UNICAL Gasoline Service Stations1995 DANNYS UNICAL Gasoline Service Stations1994 DANNYS UNICAL General Automotive Repair Shops1993 DANNYS UNICAL General Automotive Repair Shops1992 DANNYS UNION General Automotive Repair Shops1991 DANNYS UNION General Automotive Repair Shops1990 DANNYS UNION General Automotive Repair Shops1989 DANNYS UNION General Automotive Repair Shops1988 DANNYS UNION General Automotive Repair Shops1987 DANNYS UNION General Automotive Repair Shops1986 DANNYS UNION Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 525 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster A 0.099 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92666 South 684 S GLASSELL ST N/A A8 EDR Hist AutoDANNYS UNICAL 1020823752 TC5417961.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation VisualLeak Detection: 6Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: 1965Year Installed: 5299-00Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: SAN DIEGO, CA 92108Owner City,St,Zip: 1450 FRAZEE ROADOwner Address: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIOwner Name: 7146396720Telephone: DANIEL W. LENTZContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000043675Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 525 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster A 0.099 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92666 South 684 S GLASSELL ST N/A A9 HIST USTSTATION #5299 U001577528 5299-11Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000280Tank Capacity: 1965Year Installed: 5299-34Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: SAN DIEGO, CA 92108Owner City,St,Zip: 123 CAMINO DELA REINAOwner Address: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIOwner Name: 7146396720Telephone: DANIEL LENTZContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000017859Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002D601.pdfURL: 0002D601File Number: HIST UST: 525 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster A 0.099 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92666 South 684 S GLASSELL N/A A10 HIST USTUNION OIL SERVICE STATION 529 U001577532 TC5417961.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1965Year Installed: 5299-22Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1965Year Installed: UNION OIL SERVICE STATION 529 (Continued) U001577532 Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-997-4920Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92666 392 S GLASSELL STOwner/operator address: ROBERT J DUNN M D INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-997-4920Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92666 392 S GLASSELL STContact address: MARGE DUNNContact: CAD983646316EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92866 392 S GLASSELL STFacility address: ROBERT J DUNN M D INCFacility name: 08/20/1992Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1247 ft. 0.236 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 189 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92866 North FINDS392 S GLASSELL ST CAD983646316 11 RCRA-SQGROBERT J DUNN M D INC 1000818722 TC5417961.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008283936DFR URL: 110008283936Registry ID: 1000818722Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110008283936Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: ROBERT J DUNN M D INC (Continued) 1000818722 EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 04/26/2001Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 30720012Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1549 ft. 0.293 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 186 ft. 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92701 South 2739 NORTH GRAND AVENUE N/A 12 ENVIROSTORCREST CLEANERS S106797630 TC5417961.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: SB 1248 Orange CountyComments: 04/18/2001Completed Date: SB 1248 NotificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30720012Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8520Longitude: 33.77445Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: Not reportedSenate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: CREST CLEANERS (Continued)S106797630 Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose inAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: Waste OilSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002400TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1848 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster B 0.350 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 185 ft. 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92705 South HIST CORTESE2705 GRAND AVE N/A B13 LUSTGOODYEAR TIRE CENTER #1658 S102430890 TC5417961.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083002400TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Santa Ana, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: JBStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8507901Longitude: 33.7101548Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: YesInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 4/11/1994Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 11/3/1994Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 11/10/1993Discover Date: 10/24/1994Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 4/11/1994Enter Date: 11/10/1993How Stopped Date: T0605901721Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: approved site GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER #1658 (Continued) S102430890 TC5417961.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Santa Ana, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: JBStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8527474Longitude: 33.77346994Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 6/15/1988Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 6/22/1988Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/4/1994Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 5/25/1988Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 6/15/1988Enter Date: 5/25/1988How Stopped Date: T0605900699Global ID: PipingLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank TestHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: FAIRHAVENCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000885TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1929 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster B 0.365 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 184 ft. 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92701 South 2701 N. GRAND AVE N/A B14 LUSTEXXON SERVICE STATION #3981 S105960692 TC5417961.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: EXXON SERVICE STATION #3981 (Continued) S105960692 Leak DiscoveryAction: 05/25/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900699Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/04/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900699Global Id: LUST: Not reportedPhone Number: cciraulo@santa-ana.orgEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1439 S. BROADWAYAddress: SANTA ANA, CITY OFOrganization Name: CHRISTOPHER CIRAULOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900699Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900699Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: SANTA ANA, CITY OFLocal Agency: 083000885TRB Case Number: CCCase Worker: 05/04/1994Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.8527474Longitude: 33.77346994Latitude: T0605900699Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605900699Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA ANA, CITY OFLead Agency: LUST: 1974 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster B 0.374 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 183 ft. 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92701 South 2701 N N. GRAND AVE N/A B15 LUSTEXXON SERVICE STATION #3981 S109284566 TC5417961.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/04/1994Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900699Global Id: 06/22/1988Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900699Global Id: 05/25/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900699Global Id: LUST: Leak StoppedAction: 05/25/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900699Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 05/25/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900699Global Id: EXXON SERVICE STATION #3981 (Continued) S109284566 EPA Perf In-HseCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1989-10-06 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: ARCH SITEAction Name: VSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: AMF VOIT INCSite Name: CAD049901176EPA ID: 900117Site ID: 9Region: SEMS Archive Detail: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFF: 6059FIPS Code: 39Cong District: CAD049901176EPA ID: 900117Site ID: SEMS Archive: HWP ECHO FINDS Orange Co. Industrial Site 2566 ft.ENVIROSTORSite 1 of 2 in cluster C 0.486 mi.RCRA-SQG Relative: Lower Actual: 184 ft. 1/4-1/2 RCRA-TSDFORANGE, CA 92866 NNW CORRACTS426 W ALMOND CAD049901176 C16 SEMS-ARCHIVEAMF VOIT INC 1000135647 TC5417961.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing Game, Toy, and Children’s Vehicle Manufacturing 339932 33992NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a lowAction: 19881007Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD049901176EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing Game, Toy, and Children’s Vehicle Manufacturing 339932 33992NAICS Code(s): CA049PAAction: 19881007Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD049901176EPA ID: CORRACTS: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1987-12-01 00:00:00Finish Date: 1987-12-01 00:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: DISCVRYAction Name: DSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: AMF VOIT INCSite Name: CAD049901176EPA ID: 900117Site ID: 9Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: NQual: 1989-10-06 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: PAAction Name: PAAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: AMF VOIT INCSite Name: CAD049901176EPA ID: 900117Site ID: 9Region: AMF VOIT INC (Continued)1000135647 TC5417961.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3801 S HARBOR BLVDOwner/operator address: A M F VOIT INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: AMF INCORPORATEDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD049901176EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92866 426 W ALMONDFacility address: AMF VOIT INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-TSDF: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing Game, Toy, and Children’s Vehicle Manufacturing 339932 33992NAICS Code(s): CA050 - RFA CompletedAction: 19881007Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD049901176EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing Game, Toy, and Children’s Vehicle Manufacturing 339932 33992NAICS Code(s): CA074LOAction: 19881007Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD049901176EPA ID: AMF VOIT INC (Continued)1000135647 TC5417961.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NCAPS RANKING/PRIORITYEvent: 10/07/1988Event date: CA PRIORITIZATION-LOW CA PRIORITYEvent: 10/07/1988Event date: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 10/07/1988Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: AMF VOIT INCSite name: 08/18/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92666 427 W PALMYRA STOwner/operator address: LYLE SHELTON AND JOSEPH LAMONICAOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 714-546-4220Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SANTA ANA, CA 92704 AMF VOIT INC (Continued)1000135647 TC5417961.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * UnknownSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 01/01/2008Status Date: * CompletedStatus: 80001403Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 08/04/1986Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 12/01/1987Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/29/1986Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 08/26/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/11/1992Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/01/1987Date achieved compliance: 08/29/1986Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: F - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: RFA COMPLETEDEvent: 10/07/1988Event date: AMF VOIT INC (Continued)1000135647 TC5417961.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: A PA conducted. PA states NFA. Date of PA is listed as June 1988.Comments: 06/01/1988Completed Date: * CA Process is TerminatedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/07/1988Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/01/1988Completed Date: Consent OrderCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: A PA conducted. PA states NFA. Date of PA is listed as June 1988.Comments: 06/01/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/07/1988Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001403Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30340005Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD049901176Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8571Longitude: 33.78517Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: AMF VOIT INC (Continued)1000135647 TC5417961.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CONTAIN1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD049901176EPA Id: 11/04/1980Actual Date: New Operating Permit - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVEDEvent Description: CONTAIN1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD049901176EPA Id: Activities: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 37Senate District: 68Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -117.8564Longitude: 33.78643Latitude: NON-OPERATINGCleanup Status: CAD049901176EPA Id: HWP: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110000913398DFR URL: 110000913398Registry ID: 1000135647Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110000913398Registry ID: FINDS: TRICHLOROETHYLENE, PERCHLOROETHYLENEReleased Chemical: Closure certification issuedClosure Type: CLOSED 6/23/2008Current Status: RO0003429Record ID: 07IC002Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: AMF VOIT INC (Continued)1000135647 TC5417961.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 30340005Alias: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD049901176EPA Id: Alias: 06/08/1981Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVEDEvent Description: CONTAIN1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD049901176EPA Id: 11/09/1992Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGEDEvent Description: AMF VOIT INC (Continued)1000135647 30340005Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD049901176Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: JBL ENTERPRISESAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: MIXTURES Cyanide (free Nickel OIL CONTAINING WASTE * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTE * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS * UNSPECIFIED ACID SOLUTION * UNSPECIFIED * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * Metals - Other Inorganic Solid Waste * ACIDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8571Longitude: 33.78517Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 06/21/1988Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: 30340005Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2566 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C 0.486 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 184 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92667 NNW 426 WEST ALMOND N/A C17 ENVIROSTORAMF NEWPORT DIVERS S101481447 TC5417961.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED I’D FROM ASP FILESComments: 09/06/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ADDITIONAL INFO. DRIVE-BY REQUIRED SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: NEEDComments: 03/26/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CONTAMINATION PRELIM ASSESS DONE NO FURTHER ACTION, NO GROUNDWATER OR SURFACEWATERComments: 06/30/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC.Comments: 10/26/1994Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: AMF NEWPORT DIVERS (Continued) S101481447 Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: ORANGE COUNTYLead Agency: ORANGE COUNTYRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0Acres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 04/05/2004Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 30720004Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2928 ft. 0.555 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. 1/2-1 SANTA ANA, CA 92705 South 2525 NORTH GRAND AVENUE N/A 18 ENVIROSTORACE CLEANERS S106797624 TC5417961.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30720004Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 396-361-05Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 396-361-05APN: -117.8515Longitude: 33.77089Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: ACE CLEANERS (Continued)S106797624 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Eileen MananianSupervisor: Rania ZabanehProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.25Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401811Site Code: 11/16/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: 30490106Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3029 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster D 0.574 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 182 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92868 NNW VCPE OF PIXSLEY ST BTW CHAPMAN & ALMOND AVE N/A D19 ENVIROSTORSO CAL GAS/ORANGE MGP S101481479 TC5417961.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: conduct preliminary investigation activities with DHS supervision. representatives discussed PEA with DHS on 5/8/91. Contractors will conducted on 02/27/1991. Southern California Gas Company Department requested that a preliminary endangerment Assessment beComments: 06/06/1991Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: material buried on site. performed to reduce risk of future exposure to the "lamp black" DTSC approved So. Cal. Gas Co.PEA Report recomm. a removal action beComments: 03/12/1992Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/30/1993Completed Date: * Engineering Evaluation / Cost AnalysisCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/08/1994Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30490106Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401811Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400293Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033606042Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TOWN GAS PLANT ORANGE #1Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GASAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHsConfirmed COC: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHsPotential COC: MANUFACTURED GAS PLANTPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8575Longitude: 33.78710Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MGP (Continued) S101481479 TC5417961.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 06/30/2019Schedule Due Date: Public NoticeSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: Land Use RestrictionFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: CertificationFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/20/1993Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/13/1993Completed Date: * CEQACompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/25/2018Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Monitoring Report. This activity is closed. See response to comment # 3 in the RTCs from the Obeservation andComments: 04/24/2018Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: review. after the fieldwork is done to submit a completion report for DTSC’s with their plans to remove and dispose of the contaminated soils and DTSC is not requiring a VCA at this time and to submit a Tech Memo situation internally. DTSC then emailed Ben Ellis of SoCalGas that SoCalGas and their consultant ( on 5/10/2017), and discussed the contamination not previously removed, had a conference call with SoCalGas is currently undertaking and which revealed PAHs DTSC reviewed the documents regarding the construction project thatComments: 05/17/2017Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/08/1994Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MGP (Continued) S101481479 TC5417961.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/08/1994Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30490106Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401811Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400293Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033606042Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TOWN GAS PLANT ORANGE #1Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GASAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 30019Confirmed COC: 30019Potential COC: MANUFACTURED GAS PLANTPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 33.78710 / -117.8575Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 11/16/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: 37Senate: 68Assembly: 401811Site Code: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Eileen MananianSupervisor: Rania ZabanehProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 0.25Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 30490106Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 06/30/2019Schedule Due Date: De-CertificationSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 06/30/2019Schedule Due Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MGP (Continued) S101481479 TC5417961.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 04/25/2018Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Monitoring Report. This activity is closed. See response to comment # 3 in the RTCs from the Obeservation andComments: 04/24/2018Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: review. after the fieldwork is done to submit a completion report for DTSC’s with their plans to remove and dispose of the contaminated soils and DTSC is not requiring a VCA at this time and to submit a Tech Memo situation internally. DTSC then emailed Ben Ellis of SoCalGas that SoCalGas and their consultant ( on 5/10/2017), and discussed the contamination not previously removed, had a conference call with SoCalGas is currently undertaking and which revealed PAHs DTSC reviewed the documents regarding the construction project thatComments: 05/17/2017Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/08/1994Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: conduct preliminary investigation activities with DHS supervision. representatives discussed PEA with DHS on 5/8/91. Contractors will conducted on 02/27/1991. Southern California Gas Company Department requested that a preliminary endangerment Assessment beComments: 06/06/1991Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: material buried on site. performed to reduce risk of future exposure to the "lamp black" DTSC approved So. Cal. Gas Co.PEA Report recomm. a removal action beComments: 03/12/1992Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/30/1993Completed Date: * Engineering Evaluation / Cost AnalysisCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MGP (Continued) S101481479 TC5417961.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 06/30/2019Schedule Due Date: De-CertificationSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 06/30/2019Schedule Due Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 06/30/2019Schedule Due Date: Public NoticeSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: Land Use RestrictionFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: CertificationFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/20/1993Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/13/1993Completed Date: * CEQACompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SO CAL GAS/ORANGE MGP (Continued) S101481479 of the site’s surface soil to health base levels. affected. A Removal Action is scheduled in September 1993 to remove 2 - 6 feet soil is impacteed with PAHs and TPH. Groundwater does not appear to be and regulator station. A PEA approved in April 1993 revealed that the site’s from 1905 to 1911. The site is currently used as an unmanned natural gas meter The site is on a 0.25 acre lot located in the City of Orange. The MGP operated Manufactured Gas Plants: 3249 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D 0.615 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 180 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92666 NNW E OF PIXSLEY BTW CHAPMAN AND ALMOND N/A D20 EDR MGPSO CAL GAS/ORANGE MGP 1008407728 TC5417961.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedIncident Description: Not reportedIssue Date: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: NOTIFY 65: 4830 ft. 0.915 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 149 ft. 1/2-1 SANTA ANA, CA 90603 SW 2525 NORTH MAIN N/A 21 Notify 65UNOCAL S100178946 TC5417961.2s Page 37 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC5417961.2s Page 38 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC5417961.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5417961.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5417961.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC5417961.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC5417961.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5417961.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. TC5417961.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 06/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC5417961.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 05/29/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. TC5417961.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. Date of Government Version: 07/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 04/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. TC5417961.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 07/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 09/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports TC5417961.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. TC5417961.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5417961.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5417961.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 113 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 126 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5417961.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. TC5417961.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust TC5417961.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 05/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 09/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 09/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. TC5417961.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 06/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 04/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. TC5417961.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 03/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. TC5417961.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 07/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. TC5417961.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 09/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 09/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 06/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. TC5417961.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 09/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials Date of Government Version: 07/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5417961.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. TC5417961.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 08/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 07/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. TC5417961.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 08/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 04/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. TC5417961.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 07/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 07/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC5417961.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 07/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: TC5417961.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING AOCONCERN: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 07/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5417961.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2018 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 05/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: TC5417961.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5417961.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 07/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. TC5417961.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5417961.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO. SAM: Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: TC5417961.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5417961.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: TC5417961.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 06/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list TC5417961.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 07/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5417961.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 07/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 06/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5417961.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. TC5417961.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5417961.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC5417961.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5641308 ORANGE, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 185 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3737792.5UTM Y (Meters): 420951.4UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.853752 - 117˚ 51’ 13.51’’Longitude (West): 33.779058 - 33˚ 46’ 44.61’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES ORANGE, CA 92866 574 S. GLASSELL STREET KISCO GLASSELL TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC5417961.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 185 ft. North South West East166169171173177180184187179185188188189189189189190190190161146150149161168175178184185193188185193206211212215225General WSWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5417961.2s Page A-3 SW1/2 - 1 Mile NE2G S1/2 - 1 Mile North1G S1/2 - 1 Mile North23 SW1/2 - 1 Mile NE20 SW1/2 - 1 Mile WNW18 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile South7 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapORANGE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0164J FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0162J FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0161J Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0163J Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5417961.2s Page A-4 For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile South4G SW1/2 - 1 Mile WNW3G GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5417961.2s Page A-5 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 3 2 1 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC5417961.2s Page A-7 Excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: gravelly loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: SOBOBASoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reported loam very fine sandy coarse sand to gravelly loamy stratified61 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedfine sandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: SAN EMIGDIOSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5417961.2s Page A-8 > 31 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Soil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: sandSoil Surface Texture: RIVERWASHSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 141 Max: 141 gravel. Well-graded Clean Gravels, SOILIS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sand very gravelly59 inches 9 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 141 Max: 141 gravel. Well-graded Clean Gravels, SOILIS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sand gravelly loamy 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5417961.2s Page A-9 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUSGS40000138155 17 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUSGS40000138060 D16 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUSGS40000138097 C12 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWUSGS40000154213 B11 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWUSGS40000138160 B8 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SWUSGS40000138098 6 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SWUSGS40000138103 1 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sandy loam coarse sand to stratified59 inches 5 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5417961.2s Page A-10 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthCAOG11000218042 1 STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW5052 22 1/2 - 1 Mile SECADW60000018505 21 1/2 - 1 Mile ESECADW60000033211 D14 1/2 - 1 Mile ESECADW60000032211 13 1/2 - 1 Mile ESECADW60000017033 C10 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWCADW60000017032 B9 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNE5058 A5 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNE5059 A4 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNE5035 A3 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNE5051 A2 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUSGS40000137999 19 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.1202402 40240 2001 60 2401 6 0 2 00 200160 1 6 0 160160160160200200200200240 240240CA TC5417961.2s Page A-12 Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: IUStatus:5Precision: 1175100.0Longitude:334700.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 01 - INACTIVESource nam: GWater type:3010027System no: TEEUser id:08District: 30County:3010027001Frds no: 04S/09W-18B02 SPrim sta c:5035Seq: A3 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5035CA WELLS ORANGEArea serve: 30144Connection:116800Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:92666Zip: Not ReportedState:ORANGECity: P O BOX 449Address:Not ReportedHqname: CITY OF ORANGESystem nam:3010027System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: DSStatus:8Precision: 1175100.0Longitude:334700.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 06 - DESTROYEDSource nam: GWater type:3010027System no: TEEUser id:08District: 30County:3010027006Frds no: 04S/09W-31B01 SPrim sta c:5051Seq: A2 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5051CA WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 1200Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 1200Well Depth: 1976Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 004S009W31R001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: 1 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower USGS40000138103FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-13 PCI/LReport units:URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.848Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.602Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228Chemical: 1.4e-002Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 9.6e-002Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.82Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 3.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical: 5.42Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1.06Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 426.Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: CITY OF SANTA ANAArea serve: 43613Connection:293700Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:92703Zip: CAState:SANTA ANACity: 220 S. DAISY AVE., BLDG. AAddress:Not ReportedHqname: City of Santa AnaSystem nam:3010038System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: AUStatus:3Precision: 1175100.0Longitude:334700.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation ty:WELL 38Source nam: GWater type:3010038System no: TEEUser id:08District: 30County:3010038039Frds no: 04S/09W-32P02 SPrim sta c:5059Seq: A4 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5059CA WELLS ORANGEArea serve: 30144Connection:116800Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:92666Zip: Not ReportedState:ORANGECity: P O BOX 449Address:Not ReportedHqname: CITY OF ORANGESystem nam:3010027System no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-14 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.8Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 69.9Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 12.Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 56.6Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 191.Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 0.31Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.06Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 158.Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 158.Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.9Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 652.Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.4Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical: 0.304Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.342Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.11Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-15 MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 72.1Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 46.4Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.6Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 66.7Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 8.6Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 41.9Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 140.Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 0.72Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 180.Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 148.Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 534.Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 220.Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.49Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 84.6Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 58.1Finding:21-FEB-18Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-16 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.6Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 64.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 8.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 40.3Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 134.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 0.34Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 146.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 146.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.47Finding:20-MAY-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 0.72Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.13Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.2Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 308.Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 210.Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.5Finding:16-FEB-16Sample date: 0.5Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-17 RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical: 0.322Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical: 0.182Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.253Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.3Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.11Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.794Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 1.3Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.614Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.845Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 740.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.1Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.26Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 340.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 200.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 66.9Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 42.4Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-18 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.1Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 358.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 190.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 67.1Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 42.4Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.5Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 60.5Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 7.7Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 38.2Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 127.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 0.35Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 145.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 145.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 557.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-19 MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 24.4Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 81.6Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 0.41Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 141.Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 141.Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.1Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 529.Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 52.8Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 360.Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.11Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.2Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 294.Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.8Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 2.8Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 557.Finding:18-FEB-14Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-20 CITY OF SANTA ANAArea serve: 43613Connection:293700Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:92703Zip: CAState:SANTA ANACity: 220 S. DAISY AVE., BLDG. AAddress:Not ReportedHqname: City of Santa AnaSystem nam:3010038System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: AUStatus:8Precision: 1175100.0Longitude:334700.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 22Source nam: GWater type:3010038System no: TEEUser id:08District: 30County:3010038023Frds no: 04S/09W-32P01 SPrim sta c:5058Seq: A5 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5058CA WELLS 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.8Finding:16-FEB-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 870.Finding:16-FEB-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.Finding:19-FEB-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 900.Finding:19-FEB-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 37.8Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 1.5Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 81.Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 5.Finding:26-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-21 OrangeCounty name:30County id: UnknownWell use descrip:6Well use id: ’’Local well name:04S09W31B001SState well numbe: 337861N1178587W001Site code:-117.8587Longitude: 33.7861Latitude:17032Objectid: B9 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000017032CA WELLS Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 166.00Feet below surface: 1977-03-09Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: Not ReportedWell Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070203HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 004S009W31B001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: B8 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138160FED USGS Date: 06/30/1993 Average Water Depth: 175 Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Site ID: 083000885T7 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 38939AQUIFLOW ftWell Hole Depth Units: 1200Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 1200Well Depth: 1976Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 004S009W31Q001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: 6 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower USGS40000138098FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-22 Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 152.88Feet below surface: 1979-11-14Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 144.15Feet below surface: 1980-02-12Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 105.93Feet below surface: 1980-06-11Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 125.15Feet below surface: 1981-02-05Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 140.27Feet below surface: 1982-01-25Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 125.79Feet below surface: 1983-11-02Level reading date: The site had been pumped recently.Note: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 149.20Feet below surface: 1984-08-30Level reading date: The measurement was discontinued.Note: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: Not ReportedFeet below surface: 1985-11-07Level reading date: 10Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: ftWell Hole Depth Units: 714Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 714Well Depth: 19771222Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18090206HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 004S009W31B002SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: B11 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000154213FED USGS CADW60000017033Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region:80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name:30County id: UnknownWell use descrip:6Well use id: ’’Local well name:04S09W32P001SState well numbe: 337754N1178448W001Site code:-117.8448Longitude: 33.7754Latitude:17033Objectid: C10 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW60000017033CA WELLS CADW60000017032Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region:80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:’8-1’Basin code: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-23 Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name:30County id: UnknownWell use descrip:6Well use id: ’’Local well name:05S09W05B003SState well numbe: 337732N1178417W001Site code:-117.8417Longitude: 33.7732Latitude:33211Objectid: D14 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW60000033211CA WELLS CADW60000032211Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region:80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name:30County id: UnknownWell use descrip:6Well use id: ’’Local well name:04S09W32K001SState well numbe: 337773N1178438W001Site code:-117.8438Longitude: 33.7773Latitude:32211Objectid: 13 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW60000032211CA WELLS Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 167Feet below surface: 1999-04-26Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 217Feet below surface: 2003-05-19Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 228Feet below surface: 2004-05-21Level reading date: 3Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: ftWell Hole Depth Units: 1510Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 1300Well Depth: 19920818Construction Date: Unconfined single aquiferAquifer Type: AlluviumFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070203HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 004S009W32P002SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: C12 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000138097FED USGS Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 141.33Feet below surface: 1979-02-07Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 134.71Feet below surface: 1979-05-02Level reading date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-24 Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 204Feet below surface: 1998-07-05Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: ftWell Hole Depth Units: 993Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 905Well Depth: 19980428Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 004S009W32B004SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: 17 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000138155FED USGS Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 156.8Feet below surface: 2000-11-07Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 500Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: Not ReportedHUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 005S009W05B003SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: D16 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000138060FED USGS Date: 10/30/1998 Average Water Depth: 98 Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Site ID: 083000043T15 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 34233AQUIFLOW CADW60000033211Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region:80238Dwr region id: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-25 CADW60000018505Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region:80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name:30County id: UnknownWell use descrip:6Well use id: ’’Local well name:05S09W05B001SState well numbe: 337712N1178409W001Site code:-117.8409Longitude: 33.7712Latitude:18505Objectid: 21 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW60000018505CA WELLS Date: 03/22/1999 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: 200 Shallow Water Depth: 140 Groundwater Flow: SW Site ID: 083001266T20 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 49768AQUIFLOW Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 109.93Feet below surface: 2000-06-08Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: ftWell Hole Depth Units: 143.5Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 143.5Well Depth: 19991203Construction Date: Confined single aquiferAquifer Type: Quaternary AlluviumFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070203HUC: NAWQA DATA ENTRY COM + VER 06/15/2000 SDIONNEDescription: WellType: 005S009W07A001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: 19 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000137999FED USGS Date: 10/05/1998 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: 94 Shallow Water Depth: 90 Groundwater Flow: SW Site ID: 083001866T18 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 65308AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-26 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 43.5Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.63Finding:19-JAN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2.63Finding:19-JAN-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2.84Finding:25-APR-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.84Finding:25-APR-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.7Finding:25-APR-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2.7Finding:25-APR-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.73Finding:18-MAY-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2.73Finding:18-MAY-17Sample date: ORANGEArea serve: 30144Connection:116800Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:92666Zip: Not ReportedState:ORANGECity: P O BOX 449Address:Not ReportedHqname: CITY OF ORANGESystem nam:3010027System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:Not ReportedComment 1: AUStatus:5Precision: 1175130.0Longitude:334730.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation ty:WELL 18Source nam: GWater type:3010027System no: TEEUser id:08District: 30County:3010027016Frds no: 04S/09W-31B02 SPrim sta c:5052Seq: 22 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5052CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-27 MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2790.Finding:25-FEB-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 478.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BARIUMChemical: 130.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.37Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 115.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 72.2Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 2.6Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2830.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 18.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 92.4Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 305.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 195.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.9Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 770.Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.16Finding:28-APR-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-28 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 93.4Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2810.Finding:06-MAR-13Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BARIUMChemical: 113.Finding:21-MAY-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 794.Finding:21-MAY-13Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 3.79Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical: 0.125Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.2Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.3Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.11Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.22Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical: 0.47Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.47Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.93Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 3.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical: 5.96Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2680.Finding:13-MAR-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-29 MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2700.Finding:27-FEB-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 159.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.9Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 782.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 193.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 17.4Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2600.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.2Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 464.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BARIUMChemical: 122.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.33Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 119.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 75.1Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 2.8Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 43.8Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 305.Finding:31-MAY-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-30 Date: 10/30/1998 Average Water Depth: 98 Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Site ID: 083000043T5G South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 34233AQUIFLOW Date: 06/30/1993 Average Water Depth: 175 Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Site ID: 083000885T4G South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 38939AQUIFLOW Date: 10/05/1998 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: 94 Shallow Water Depth: 90 Groundwater Flow: SW Site ID: 083001866T3G WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 65308AQUIFLOW Date: 03/22/1999 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: 200 Shallow Water Depth: 140 Groundwater Flow: SW Site ID: 083001266T2G NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 49768AQUIFLOW Date: 10/07/1996 Average Water Depth: 100 Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: S Site ID: 083002889T1G North 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 69433AQUIFLOW Date: 10/07/1996 Average Water Depth: 100 Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: S Site ID: 083002889T23 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 69433AQUIFLOW 0.4Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-31 CAOG11000218042Site id: PDHGissymbol:UnknownDirectiona: Not ReportedCompletion:Not ReportedAbandonedd: 0Redrillfoo:0Welldeptha: Not ReportedSpuddate:NConfidenti: NHydraulica:NEpawell: 1Wellnumber:Not ReportedLeasename: Not ReportedComments:hudGissourcec: Not ReportedLocationde:Not ReportedElevation: SBBasemeridi:09WRange: 05STownship:6Section: Any AreaAreaname:Any FieldFieldname: OrangeCountyname:Trustees Dev. AssociationOperatorna: PWellstatus:YDryhole: Not ReportedRedrillcan:NBlmwell: 05901266Apinumber:1Districtnu: 1 South 1/2 - 1 Mile CAOG11000218042OIL_GAS Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5417961.2s Page A-32 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.763 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 30 Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 01892866 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5417961.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC5417961.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5417961.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED neercS tnemhcaorcnE ropaV RDE teehskroW tnemhcaorcnE ropaV s’RDE gnisu deraperP 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Inquiry Number: 5417961.2s September 19, 2018 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Primary Map 2 Secondary Map 3 Map Findings 4 Record Sources and Currency GR-1 Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice The EDR Vapor Encroachment Worksheet enables EDR's customers to make certain online modifications that effects maps, text and calculations contained in this Report. As a result, maps, text and calculations contained in this Report may have been so modified. EDR has not taken any action to verify any such modifications, and this report and the findings set forth herein must be read in light of this fact. Environmental Data Resources shall not be responsible for any customer's decision to include or not include in any final report any records determined to be within the relevant minimum search distances. This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANYSUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can produce information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS TC Page 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by EDR. The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of the ASTM Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Encroachment into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions (E 2600). STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Default Area of Concern (Miles)*property1/10> 1/10Federal NPL site list 1.0 0 0 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list 1.0 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS list 0.5 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0.5 0 0 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1.0 0 0 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0.5 0 0 0 Federal RCRA generators list 0.25 0 0 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0.5 0 0 0 Federal ERNS list 0.001 0 0 - State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 1.0 0 0 0 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 1.0 0 0 0 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0.5 0 0 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0.5 0 0 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0.25 0 0 0 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries not searched --- State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0.5 0 0 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites 0.5 0 0 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0.5 0 0 0 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0.5 0 0 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 1.0 0 0 0 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 0.25 0 0 0 Local Land Records 0.5 0 0 0 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0.5 0 0 0 Other Ascertainable Records 1.0 0 0 0 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 1.0 0 0 0 Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0.001 0 0 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 *The Default Area of Concern may be adjusted by the environmental professional using experience and professional judgement. Each category may include several databases, and each database may have a different distance. A list of individual databases is provided at the back of this report. EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES EDR Exclusive Records 1.0 0 0 0 Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0.001 0 0 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS KISCO GLASSELL 574 S. GLASSELL STREET ORANGE, CA 92866 COORDINATES Latitude (North):33.779058 - 33° 46¢ 44.603577² Longitude (West):117.853752 - 117° 51¢ 13.50769² Elevation:185 ft. above sea level EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 SEARCH RESULTS Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page Not Reported Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page Not Reported Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page Not Reported Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page Not Reported EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 . BeginOC-start-Wetlands-BeginOC-startBeginOC-start-- State Wetlands-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- State WetlandsBeginOC-start-- National Wetlands Inventory-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- National Wetlands InventoryBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-WetlandsBeginOC-start-Water-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-WaterBeginOC-start-Areas of Concern-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Areas of ConcernBeginOC-start-Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas PipelinesBeginOC-start-Flood Zones-BeginOC-startBeginOC-start-- 500 Year Zone-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- 500 Year ZoneBeginOC-start-- 100 Year Zone-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- 100 Year ZoneBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Flood ZonesBeginOC-start-Streets-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-StreetsBeginOC-start-Railroads-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-RailroadsBeginOC-start-Target Property Location-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Target Property LocationBeginOC-start-Federal DOD Records-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Federal DOD RecordsBeginOC-start-Indian Reservations BIA-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Indian Reservations BIABeginOC-start-National Priority List Records-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-National Priority List RecordsBeginOC-start-Search Rings-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Search Rings . BeginOC-start-Wetlands-BeginOC-startBeginOC-start-- State Wetlands-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- State WetlandsBeginOC-start-- National Wetlands Inventory-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- National Wetlands InventoryBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-WetlandsBeginOC-start-Water-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-WaterBeginOC-start-Areas of Concern-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Areas of ConcernBeginOC-start-Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines-BeginOC-start 60 kV BeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas PipelinesBeginOC-start-Flood Zones-BeginOC-startBeginOC-start-- 500 Year Zone-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- 500 Year ZoneBeginOC-start-- 100 Year Zone-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-- 100 Year ZoneBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Flood ZonesBeginOC-start-Streets-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-StreetsBeginOC-start-Railroads-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-RailroadsBeginOC-start-Contour Lines-BeginOC-start BeginOC-start-Contour Lines-OffBeginOC-start 2 001 6 0 1 6 0160160 160160200200200200 BeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Contour LinesBeginOC-start-Target Property Location-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Target Property LocationBeginOC-start-Federal DOD Records-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Federal DOD RecordsBeginOC-start-Indian Reservations BIA-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Indian Reservations BIABeginOC-start-National Priority List Records-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-National Priority List RecordsBeginOC-start-Search Rings-BeginOC-startBeginOC-end-BeginOC-end-Search Rings LEGEND DATABASE ACRONYM: Applicable categories (A hoverbox with database description). FACILITY NAME FACILITY ADDRESS, CITY, ST, ZIP EDR SITE ID NUMBER u MAP ID# Direction Distance Range (Distance feet / miles) Relative Elevation Feet Above Sea Level ASTM 2600 Record Sources found in this report. Each database searched has been assigned to one or more categories. For detailed information about categorization, see the section of the report Records Searched and Currency. Worksheet: Comments: Comments may be added on the online Vapor Encroachment Worksheet. MAP FINDINGS TC Page 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDSFederal NPL site listUS NPL National Priority ListEPA07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund LiensEPA10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994Federal CERCLIS listUS SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities listUS CORRACTS Corrective Action ReportEPA03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018Federal RCRA TSD facilities listUS RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018Federal RCRA generators listUS RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registriesUS LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 05/14/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites ListEnvironmental Protection Agency 02/13/2018 02/27/2018 05/11/2018US US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional ControlsEnvironmental Protection Agency 02/13/2018 02/27/2018 05/11/2018Federal ERNS listUS ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 03/19/2018 03/27/2018 06/08/2018State and tribal - equivalent NPLCA RESPONSE State Response SitesDepartment of Toxic Substances Control 07/30/2018 07/31/2018 09/07/2018State and tribal - equivalent CERCLISCA ENVIROSTOR EnviroStor DatabaseDepartment of Toxic Substances Control 07/30/2018 07/31/2018 09/07/2018State and tribal landfill / solid waste disposalCA SWF/LF (SWIS) Solid Waste Information SystemDepartment of Resources Recycling and Recover 08/08/2018 08/10/2018 08/24/2018State and tribal leaking storage tank listsCA LUST REG 1 Active Toxic Site InvestigationCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/01/2001 02/28/2001 03/29/2001CA LUST REG 7 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/26/2004 02/26/2004 03/24/2004CA LUST REG 8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/14/2005 02/15/2005 03/28/2005CA LUST REG 6V Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 06/07/2005 06/07/2005 06/29/2005CA LUST REG 6L Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/09/2003 09/10/2003 10/07/2003CA LUST REG 5 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 07/01/2008 07/22/2008 07/31/2008CA LUST Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/17/2018TC5417961.2s Page GR-1GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date CA LUST REG 2 Fuel Leak ListCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA LUST REG 3 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/19/2003 05/19/2003 06/02/2003CA LUST REG 4 Underground Storage Tank Leak List California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004CA LUST REG 9 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 03/01/2001 04/23/2001 05/21/2001US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1004/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 04/10/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 804/25/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 704/24/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 604/01/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 405/08/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 104/13/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 504/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018CA CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/17/2018CA SLIC REG 1 Active Toxic Site InvestigationsCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Boa 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 04/25/2003CA SLIC REG 2 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board San Fran 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA SLIC REG 3 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/18/2006 05/18/2006 06/15/2006CA SLIC REG 4 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angele 11/17/2004 11/18/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 5 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board Central 04/01/2005 04/05/2005 04/21/2005CA SLIC REG 6V Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorv 05/24/2005 05/25/2005 06/16/2005CA SLIC REG 6L SLIC SitesCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004CA SLIC REG 7 SLIC ListCalifornia Regional Quality Control Board, Co 11/24/2004 11/29/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 8 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Region Water Quality Control Board 04/03/2008 04/03/2008 04/14/2008CA SLIC REG 9 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/10/2007 09/11/2007 09/28/2007State and tribal registered storage tank listsCA UST Active UST FacilitiesSWRCB06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/09/2018CA MILITARY UST SITES Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018CA UST CLOSURE Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/10/2018CA UST MENDOCINO Mendocino County UST Database Department of Public Health 03/28/2018 05/25/2018 07/10/2018CA AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities California Environmental Protection Agency 07/06/2016 07/12/2016 09/19/2016US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1004/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 904/10/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 804/25/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 704/24/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 604/01/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 104/13/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 405/08/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 504/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA05/15/2017 05/30/2017 10/13/2017TC5417961.2s Page GR-2GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date State and tribal voluntary cleanup sitesUS INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority ListingEPA, Region 107/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016CA VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/30/2018 07/31/2018 09/07/2018US INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority LisitngEPA, Region 703/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008State and tribal Brownfields sitesCA BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing State Water Resources Control Board 06/25/2018 06/27/2018 08/06/2018Other RecordsUS CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 03/31/2018 04/16/2018 06/29/2018US ROD Records Of DecisionEPA05/13/2018 05/30/2018 06/29/2018US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien InformationEnvironmental Protection Agency 05/13/2018 05/30/2018 06/29/2018CA HIST CAL-SITES Calsites DatabaseDepartment of Toxic Substance Control 08/08/2005 08/03/2006 08/24/2006US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 901/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009CA SWRCY Recycler DatabaseDepartment of Conservation 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 08/06/2018CA CA FID UST Facility Inventory DatabaseCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency 10/31/1994 09/05/1995 09/29/1995CA HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database State Water Resources Control Board 10/15/1990 01/25/1991 02/12/1991CA SAN FRANCISCO AST Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing San Francisco County Department of Public Hea 04/19/2018 04/24/2018 05/04/2018CA SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST ListingState Water Resources Control Board 06/01/1994 07/07/2005 08/11/2005US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter SitesAmerican Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter SitesEnvironmental Protection Agency 05/13/2018 05/30/2018 06/29/2018US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 09/30/2017 05/08/2018 07/20/2018US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 05/24/2017 11/30/2017 12/15/2017US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 12/23/2016 12/27/2016 02/17/2017US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LISTEnvironmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance InformationEnvironmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/27/2018 06/22/2018US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System DataEPA10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 02/22/2018 03/01/2018 05/11/2018US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2017 02/03/2017 04/07/2017US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2014 09/10/2014 10/20/2014US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2005 08/07/2009 10/22/2009US Delisted NPL National Priority List DeletionsEPA07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA07/17/2018 08/09/2018 09/07/2018US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 03/26/2018 03/27/2018 06/08/2018US DOT OPS Incident and Accident DataDepartment of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 07/31/2012 08/07/2012 09/18/2012US US CDL Clandestine Drug LabsDrug Enforcement Administration 02/22/2018 03/01/2018 05/11/2018US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields SitesEnvironmental Protection Agency 03/19/2018 03/21/2018 06/08/2018US DOD Department of Defense SitesUSGS12/31/2005 11/10/2006 01/11/2007US FEDLAND Federal and Indian LandsU.S. Geological Survey 12/31/2005 02/06/2006 01/11/2007US FUDS Formerly Used Defense SitesU.S. Army Corps of Engineers 01/31/2015 07/08/2015 10/13/2015US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings SitesDepartment of Energy 06/23/2017 10/11/2017 11/03/2017US ODI Open Dump InventoryEnvironmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004US US MINES Mines Master Index FileDepartment of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 05/03/2018 05/31/2018 06/29/2018US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS12/05/2005 02/29/2008 04/18/2008TC5417961.2s Page GR-3GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011US PRP Potentially Responsible PartiesEPA10/25/2013 10/17/2014 10/20/2014US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA12/31/2016 01/10/2018 01/12/2018US TSCA Toxic Substances Control ActEPA12/31/2016 06/21/2017 01/05/2018US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US SSTS Section 7 Tracking SystemsEPA12/31/2009 12/10/2010 02/25/2011US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017US PADS PCB Activity Database SystemEPA06/01/2017 06/09/2017 10/13/2017US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 08/30/2016 09/08/2016 10/21/2016US RADINFO Radiation Information DatabaseEnvironmental Protection Agency 04/03/2018 04/05/2018 06/29/2018US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA02/21/2018 02/23/2018 03/23/2018US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RMP Risk Management PlansEnvironmental Protection Agency 05/01/2018 05/17/2018 09/07/2018US BRS Biennial Reporting SystemEPA/NTIS12/31/2015 02/22/2017 09/28/2017US PWS Public Water System DataEPA12/17/2013 01/09/2014 10/15/2014US INDIAN RESERV Indian ReservationsUSGS12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008CA CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure PlanDepartment of Health Services 01/01/1989 07/27/1994 08/02/1994CA CDL Clandestine Drug LabsDepartment of Toxic Substances Control 12/31/2017 06/12/2018 08/06/2018CA CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Office of Emergency Services 04/06/2018 04/24/2018 06/14/2018CA CORTESE "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information 06/25/2018 06/27/2018 08/06/2018CA CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON CUPA Facility ListingLivermore-Pleasanton Fire Department 04/03/2018 05/07/2018 06/15/2018CA CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO CUPA SAN FRANCISCO COSan Francisco County Department of Environmen 04/20/2018 04/24/2018 05/04/2018CA DEED Deed Restriction ListingDTSC and SWRCB 06/04/2018 06/06/2018 07/17/2018CA DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST DRYCLEAN SOUTH COASTSouth Coast Air Quality Management District 03/16/2018 03/20/2018 05/04/2018CA DRYCLEANERS Cleaner FacilitiesDepartment of Toxic Substance Control 05/31/2018 06/20/2018 08/06/2018CA DRYCLEAN AVAQMD Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner L Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Distri 06/25/2018 06/28/2018 08/06/2018CA EMI Emissions Inventory DataCalifornia Air Resources Board 12/31/2017 06/20/2018 08/06/2018CA ENF Enforcement Action ListingState Water Resoruces Control Board 08/01/2018 08/02/2018 09/07/2018CA Financial Assurance 1 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/18/2018 04/20/2018 06/19/2018CA Financial Assurance 2 Financial Assurance Information Listing California Integrated Waste Management Board 05/14/2018 05/15/2018 06/22/2018CA HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing Integrated Waste Management Board 05/29/2018 05/30/2018 07/17/2018CA HAZNET Facility and Manifest DataCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/2016 07/12/2017 10/17/2017CA HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/01/2001 01/22/2009 04/08/2009CA HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 05/21/2018 05/23/2018 07/17/2018CA HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/09/2018 07/11/2018 08/24/2018CA ICE ICEDepartment of Toxic Subsances Control 05/21/2018 05/23/2018 07/17/2018CA LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Qualilty Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/17/2018CA LIENS Environmental Liens ListingDepartment of Toxic Substances Control 05/31/2018 06/05/2018 07/18/2018CA MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/17/2018CA MINES Mines Site Location ListingDepartment of Conservation 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 08/06/2018CA MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing Department of Public Health 05/23/2018 06/06/2018 07/18/2018CA NPDES NPDES Permits ListingState Water Resources Control Board 05/14/2018 05/16/2018 07/05/2018CA PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing Department of Pesticide Regulation 06/04/2018 06/06/2018 07/19/2018TC5417961.2s Page GR-4GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date CA PROC Certified Processors DatabaseDepartment of Conservation 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 08/06/2018CA NOTIFY 65 Proposition 65 RecordsState Water Resources Control Board 06/18/2018 06/20/2018 08/06/2018CA SCH School Property Evaluation Program Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/30/2018 07/31/2018 09/07/2018CA SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearchFirstSearch06/06/2012 01/03/2013 02/22/2013CA TOXIC PITS Toxic Pits Cleanup Act SitesState Water Resources Control Board 07/01/1995 08/30/1995 09/26/1995CA UIC UIC ListingDeaprtment of Conservation 04/27/2018 06/13/2018 07/17/2018CA WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits ListingRWQCB, Central Valley Region 04/10/2018 04/13/2018 06/19/2018CA WDS Waste Discharge SystemState Water Resources Control Board 06/19/2007 06/20/2007 06/29/2007CA WIP Well Investigation Program Case List Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board 07/03/2009 07/21/2009 08/03/2009CA WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database State Water Resources Control Board 04/01/2000 04/10/2000 05/10/2000US UXO Unexploded Ordnance SitesDepartment of Defense 09/30/2016 10/31/2017 01/12/2018CA CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks California Environmental Protection Agency 07/23/2018 07/25/2018 09/05/2018US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned MinesDepartment of Interior 03/08/2018 03/13/2018 06/08/2018CA CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System State Water Resources Control Board 06/04/2018 06/06/2018 07/13/2018CA PROJECT Project Sites (GEOTRACKER)State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018CA SAMPLING POINT Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018CA UIC GEO Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resource Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 02/25/2018 03/17/2018 06/08/2018CA PROD WATER PONDS Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA05/21/2018 05/23/2018 09/07/2018US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian LandDepartment of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/04/2018 01/19/2018 04/13/2018CA CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTECalEPA07/23/2018 07/25/2018 09/05/2018CA WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018CA OTHER OIL GAS Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018CA MILITARY PRIV SITES Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018CA NON-CASE INFO Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 06/11/2018 06/13/2018 07/18/2018CA CERS CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data California Environmental Protection Agency 07/23/2018 07/25/2018 09/05/2018HISTORICAL USE RECORDSUS EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR, Inc.CA RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Resources Recycling and Recover 07/01/2013 01/13/2014CA RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan State Water Resources Control Board 07/01/2013 12/30/2013TC5417961.2s Page GR-5GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date COUNTY RECORDSCA CS ALAMEDA Contaminated SitesAlameda County Environmental Health Services 08/03/2018 08/06/2018 09/05/2018CA UST ALAMEDA Underground TanksAlameda County Environmental Health Services 04/05/2018 04/10/2018 05/04/2018CA CUPA AMADOR CUPA Facility ListAmador County Environmental Health 07/01/2018 07/24/2018 08/20/2018CA CUPA BUTTE CUPA Facility ListingPublic Health Department 04/21/2017 04/25/2017 08/09/2017CA CUPA CALVERAS CUPA Facility ListingCalveras County Environmental Health 08/02/2018 08/06/2018 08/20/2018CA CUPA COLUSA CUPA Facility ListHealth & Human Services 05/23/2018 05/24/2018 07/13/2018CA SL CONTRA COSTA Site ListContra Costa Health Services Department 05/21/2018 05/25/2018 07/20/2018CA CUPA DEL NORTE CUPA Facility ListDel Norte County Environmental Health Divisio 04/27/2018 05/02/2018 06/15/2018CA CUPA EL DORADO CUPA Facility ListEl Dorado County Environmental Management Dep 07/12/2018 07/12/2018 08/20/2018CA CUPA FRESNO CUPA Resources ListDept. of Community Health 07/11/2018 07/17/2018 08/30/2018CA CUPA GLENN CUPA Facility ListGlenn County Air Pollution Control District 01/22/2018 01/24/2018 03/14/2018CA CUPA HUMBOLDT CUPA Facility ListHumboldt County Environmental Health 07/11/2018 07/13/2018 08/22/2018CA CUPA IMPERIAL CUPA Facility ListSan Diego Border Field Office 07/17/2018 07/24/2018 09/05/2018CA CUPA INYO CUPA Facility ListInyo County Environmental Health Services 04/02/2018 04/03/2018 06/14/2018CA UST KERN Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Environment Health Services Depar 05/02/2018 05/07/2018 07/18/2018CA CUPA KINGS CUPA Facility ListKings County Department of Public Health 06/12/2018 06/15/2018 07/13/2018CA CUPA LAKE CUPA Facility ListLake County Environmental Health 08/08/2018 08/09/2018 08/22/2018CA CUPA LASSEN CUPA Facility ListLassen County Environmental Health 07/27/2018 08/06/2018 09/05/2018CA AOCONCERN San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern EPA Region 903/30/2009 03/31/2009 10/23/2009CA HMS LOS ANGELES HMS: Street Number ListDepartment of Public Works 04/12/2018 04/16/2018 06/15/2018CA LF LOS ANGELES List of Solid Waste FacilitiesLa County Department of Public Works 07/16/2018 07/18/2018 08/24/2018CA LF LOS ANGELES CITY City of Los Angeles LandfillsEngineering & Construction Division 01/01/2018 05/01/2018 05/14/2018CA SITE MIT LOS ANGELES Site Mitigation ListCommunity Health Services 04/01/2018 04/17/2018 06/19/2018CA UST EL SEGUNDO City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank City of El Segundo Fire Department 01/21/2017 04/19/2017 05/10/2017CA UST LONG BEACH City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank City of Long Beach Fire Department 03/09/2017 03/10/2017 05/03/2017CA UST TORRANCE City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank City of Torrance Fire Department 01/04/2018 01/05/2018 01/18/2018CA CUPA MADERA CUPA Facility ListMadera County Environmental Health 05/22/2018 05/24/2018 07/31/2018CA UST MARIN Underground Storage Tank SitesPublic Works Department Waste Management 03/30/2018 04/06/2018 05/04/2018CA CUPA MERCED CUPA Facility ListMerced County Environmental Health 05/30/2018 06/01/2018 07/13/2018CA CUPA MONO CUPA Facility ListMono County Health Department 05/22/2018 05/24/2018 07/13/2018CA CUPA MONTEREY CUPA Facility ListingMonterey County Health Department 07/30/2018 08/02/2018 09/05/2018CA LUST NAPA Sites With Reported Contamination Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 01/09/2017 01/11/2017 03/02/2017CA UST NAPA Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 05/23/2018 05/31/2018 07/11/2018CA CUPA NEVADA CUPA Facility ListCommunity Development Agency 07/31/2018 08/02/2018 09/05/2018CA IND_SITE ORANGE List of Industrial Site CleanupsHealth Care Agency 04/02/2018 05/11/2018 06/22/2018CA LUST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Health Care Agency 04/02/2018 05/11/2018 06/25/2018CA UST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Health Care Agency 04/02/2018 05/08/2018 07/10/2018CA MS PLACER Master List of FacilitiesPlacer County Health and Human Services 05/31/2018 06/05/2018 07/18/2018CA CUPA PLUMAS CUPA Facility ListPlumas County Environmental Health 07/19/2018 07/25/2018 09/05/2018CA LUST RIVERSIDE Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Department of Environmental Health 07/09/2018 07/13/2018 08/24/2018CA UST RIVERSIDE Underground Storage Tank Tank List Department of Environmental Health 04/05/2018 04/10/2018 05/04/2018CA CS SACRAMENTO Toxic Site Clean-Up ListSacramento County Environmental Management 05/07/2018 07/03/2018 08/13/2018CA ML SACRAMENTO Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Sacramento County Environmental Management 05/14/2018 07/03/2018 08/13/2018CA CUPA SAN BENITO CUPA Facility ListSan Benito County Environmental Health 08/07/2018 08/09/2018 09/05/2018CA PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO Hazardous Material PermitsSan Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardo 04/09/2018 04/11/2018 06/19/2018TC5417961.2s Page GR-6GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date CA HMMD SAN DIEGO Hazardous Materials Management Division Database Hazardous Materials Management Division 06/04/2018 06/06/2018 07/17/2018CA LF SAN DIEGO Solid Waste FacilitiesDepartment of Health Services 04/18/2018 04/24/2018 06/19/2018CA SAN DIEGO CO LOP Local Oversight Program ListingDepartment of Environmental Health 07/17/2018 07/24/2018 08/24/2018CA SAN DIEGO CO. SAM Environmental Case ListingSan Diego County Department of Environmental 03/23/2010 06/15/2010 07/09/2010CA LUST SAN FRANCISCO Local Oversite FacilitiesDepartment Of Public Health San Francisco Cou 09/19/2008 09/19/2008 09/29/2008CA UST SAN FRANCISCO Underground Storage Tank Information Department of Public Health 06/07/2018 06/12/2018 07/10/2018CA UST SAN JOAQUIN San Joaquin Co. USTEnvironmental Health Department 06/22/2018 06/26/2018 07/11/2018CA CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO CUPA Facility ListSan Luis Obispo County Public Health Departme 08/20/2018 08/21/2018 09/07/2018CA BI SAN MATEO Business InventorySan Mateo County Environmental Health Service 06/12/2018 06/15/2018 08/06/2018CA LUST SAN MATEO Fuel Leak ListSan Mateo County Environmental Health Service 06/12/2018 06/15/2018 08/13/2018CA CUPA SANTA BARBARA CUPA Facility ListingSanta Barbara County Public Health Department 09/08/2011 09/09/2011 10/07/2011CA CUPA SANTA CLARA Cupa Facility ListDepartment of Environmental Health 08/17/2018 08/22/2018 09/07/2018CA HIST LUST SANTA CLARA HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report Santa Clara Valley Water District 03/29/2005 03/30/2005 04/21/2005CA LUST SANTA CLARA LOP ListingDepartment of Environmental Health 03/03/2014 03/05/2014 03/18/2014CA SAN JOSE HAZMAT Hazardous Material FacilitiesCity of San Jose Fire Department 05/16/2018 05/22/2018 07/19/2018CA CUPA SANTA CRUZ CUPA Facility ListSanta Cruz County Environmental Health 01/21/2017 02/22/2017 05/23/2017CA CUPA SHASTA CUPA Facility ListShasta County Department of Resource Manageme 06/15/2017 06/19/2017 08/09/2017CA LUST SOLANO Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Solano County Department of Environmental Man 06/04/2018 06/08/2018 07/18/2018CA UST SOLANO Underground Storage TanksSolano County Department of Environmental Man 06/04/2018 06/12/2018 07/12/2018CA CUPA SONOMA Cupa Facility ListCounty of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services De 06/19/2018 06/26/2018 07/17/2018CA LUST SONOMA Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Department of Health Services 07/03/2018 07/10/2018 08/24/2018CA CUPA STANISLAUS CUPA Facility ListStanislaus County Department of Ennvironmenta 08/14/2018 08/16/2018 08/24/2018CA UST SUTTER Underground Storage TanksSutter County Department of Agriculture 06/04/2018 06/08/2018 07/11/2018CA CUPA TEHAMA CUPA Facility ListTehama County Department of Environmental Hea 07/17/2018 08/02/2018 09/07/2018CA CUPA TRINITY CUPA Facility ListDepartment of Toxic Substances Control 07/17/2018 07/24/2018 09/07/2018CA CUPA TULARE CUPA Facility ListTulare County Environmental Health Services D 03/19/2018 03/22/2018 04/17/2018CA CUPA TUOLUMNE CUPA Facility ListDivison of Environmental Health 04/23/2018 04/25/2018 06/25/2018CA BWT VENTURA Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Unde Ventura County Environmental Health Division 07/02/2018 07/26/2018 09/05/2018CA LF VENTURA Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Environmental Health Division 12/01/2011 12/01/2011 01/19/2012CA LUST VENTURA Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Environmental Health Division 05/29/2008 06/24/2008 07/31/2008CA MED WASTE VENTURA Medical Waste Program ListVentura County Resource Management Agency 07/02/2018 07/26/2018 08/24/2018CA UST VENTURA Underground Tank Closed Sites List Environmental Health Division 04/26/2018 06/13/2018 07/11/2018CA UST YOLO Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Yolo County Department of Health 06/20/2018 07/03/2018 07/12/2018CA CUPA YUBA CUPA Facility ListYuba County Environmental Health Department 05/10/2018 05/15/2018 06/15/2018STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.TC5417961.2s Page GR-7GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date APPENDIX F The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Inquiry Number: September 10, 2018 5417961.11 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 1995 1"=500'Acquisition Date: October 03, 1995 USGS/DOQQ 1989 1"=500'Flight Date: August 03, 1989 USDA 1985 1"=500'Flight Date: September 13, 1985 USDA 1977 1"=500'Flight Date: January 18, 1977 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific 1972 1"=500'Flight Date: October 30, 1972 USGS 1966 1"=500'Flight Date: April 16, 1966 USGS 1963 1"=500'Flight Date: February 28, 1963 USGS 1952 1"=500'Flight Date: December 12, 1952 USDA 1946 1"=500'Flight Date: December 29, 1946 USGS 1938 1"=500'Flight Date: June 21, 1938 USDA EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 09/10/18 Kisco Glassell Site Name:Client Name: Leighton Consulting 574 S. Glassell Street 17781 Cowan Orange, CA 92866 Irvine, CA 92614 EDR Inquiry #5417961.11 Contact:Brynn Mcculloch Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5417961 11-page 2 5417961.11 2016 = 500' 5417961.11 2012 = 500' 5417961.11 2009 = 500' 5417961.11 2005 = 500' 5417961.11 1995 = 500' 5417961.11 1989 = 500' 5417961.11 1985 = 500' 5417961.11 1977 = 500' 5417961.11 1972 = 500' 5417961.11 1966 = 500' 5417961.11 1963 = 500' 5417961.11 1952 = 500' 5417961.11 1946 = 500' 5417961.11 1938 = 500' EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 September 10, 2018 5417961.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 2012 1981 1972 1964 1950 1949 1942 1935 1932 1902 1901 1898 1896 09/10/18 Kisco Glassell Leighton Consulting 574 S. Glassell Street 17781 Cowan Orange, CA 92866 Irvine, CA 92614 5417961.4 Brynn Mcculloch EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Leighton Consulting were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. 12137.001 33.779058 33° 46' 45" North Kisco Glassell -117.853752 -117° 51' 14" West Zone 11 North 420953.19 3737986.26 185.00' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5417961 4 2 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 2012 Source Sheets 2012 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 1981 Source Sheets 1981 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 1981 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 1972 Source Sheets 1972 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1972 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1964 Source Sheets 1964 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 5417961 4 3 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1950 Source Sheets 1950 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1946 1950 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1949 Source Sheets 1949 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1946 1949 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1942 Source Sheets 1942 ANAHEIM 15-minute, 50000 1935 Source Sheets 1935 Garden Grove 7.5-minute, 31680 1935 Orange 7.5-minute, 31680 5417961 4 4 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1932 Source Sheets 1932 Orange 7.5-minute, 31680 1902 Source Sheets 1902 Corona 30-minute, 125000 1901 Source Sheets 1901 Anaheim 15-minute, 62500 1898 Source Sheets 1898 Anaheim 15-minute, 62500 5417961 4 5 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1896 Source Sheets 1896 Anaheim 15-minute, 62500 5417961 4 6 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 2012, 7.5-minute NW, Anaheim, 2012, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 7 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 1981, 7.5-minute NW, Anaheim, 1981, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 8 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 1972, 7.5-minute NW, Anaheim, 1972, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 9 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1964 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 1964, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 10 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1950 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 1950, 7.5-minute NW, Anaheim, 1950, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 11 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1949 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 1949, 7.5-minute NW, Anaheim, 1949, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 12 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1942 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, ANAHEIM, 1942, 15-minute 5417961 4 13 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1935 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 1935, 7.5-minute NW, Garden Grove, 1935, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 14 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1932 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Orange, 1932, 7.5-minute 5417961 4 15 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1902 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Corona, 1902, 30-minute 5417961 4 16 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1901 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Anaheim, 1901, 15-minute 5417961 4 17 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1898 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Anaheim, 1898, 15-minute 5417961 4 18 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1896 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Leighton Consulting TP, Anaheim, 1896, 15-minute 5417961 4 19 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 September 10, 2018 5417961.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 1954 1950 1929 1922 09/10/18 574 S. Glassell Street Kisco Glassell Leighton Consulting 17781 Cowan Orange, CA 92866 5417961.3 Irvine, CA 92614 Brynn Mcculloch The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Leighton Consulting were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 93BC-4EA4-9B4A 12137.001 Maps Provided: Kisco Glassell Certification #: 93BC-4EA4-9B4A Leighton Consulting (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5417961 3 2 page- Sanborn Sheet Key This Certified Sanborn Map Report is based upon the following Sanborn Fire Insurance map sheets. 1954 Source Sheets 1954 Volume 1, Sheet 21 1950 Source Sheets 1950 Volume 1, Sheet 21 1929 Source Sheets 1929 Volume 1, Sheet 21 1922 Source Sheets 1922 Volume 1, Sheet 21 5417961 3 3 This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection.0 Feet 150 300 600 - page Certified Sanborn® Map 93BC-4EA4-9B4A93BC-4EA4-9B4A 1954 1954 Order Date:09/10/2018 Certification # Site Name: Address: Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street City, ST, ZIP:Orange, CA 92866 EDR Inquiry:5417961.3 Client:Leighton Consulting Copyright Volume 1, Sheet 21 5417961 3 4 This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection.0 Feet 150 300 600 - page Certified Sanborn® Map 93BC-4EA4-9B4A93BC-4EA4-9B4A 1950 1950 Order Date:09/10/2018 Certification # Site Name: Address: Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street City, ST, ZIP:Orange, CA 92866 EDR Inquiry:5417961.3 Client:Leighton Consulting Copyright Volume 1, Sheet 21 5417961 3 5 This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection.0 Feet 150 300 600 - page Certified Sanborn® Map 93BC-4EA4-9B4A93BC-4EA4-9B4A 1929 1929 Order Date:09/10/2018 Certification # Site Name: Address: Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street City, ST, ZIP:Orange, CA 92866 EDR Inquiry:5417961.3 Client:Leighton Consulting Copyright Volume 1, Sheet 21 5417961 3 6 This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection.0 Feet 150 300 600 - page Certified Sanborn® Map 93BC-4EA4-9B4A93BC-4EA4-9B4A 1922 1922 Order Date:09/10/2018 Certification # Site Name: Address: Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street City, ST, ZIP:Orange, CA 92866 EDR Inquiry:5417961.3 Client:Leighton Consulting Copyright Volume 1, Sheet 21 5417961 3 7 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Inquiry Number: 5417961.5 September 10, 2018 The EDR-City Directory Abstract 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2014. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property. A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 2014 EDR Digital Archive -X X - EDR Digital Archive X X X - 2010 EDR Digital Archive -X X - EDR Digital Archive X X X - 2005 EDR Digital Archive -X X - EDR Digital Archive X X X - 2002 Haines Company -X X - 2001 Pacific Telephone ---- 1997 Pacific Telephone ---- 1995 Pacific Bell -X X - 1992 Pacific Bell ---- 1991 Pacific Bell -X X - 5417961-5 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 1991 Pacific Bell X X X - 1986 Pacific Bell -X X - 1980 Pacific Telephone -X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1975 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc.-X X - Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc.X X X - 1971 Luskey Brothers Co., Inc.---- 1970 General Telephone Co., of California -X X - 1966 Pacific Telephone -X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1965 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc.-X X - Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc.X X X - Ross Publications, Inc.,-X X - Ross Publications, Inc.,X X X - 1961 Luskey Brothers & Co.,---- 1960 Unknown ---- 1956 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc.---- 1955 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.-X X - 1952 Luskeys Directory Service Co.-X X - 1950 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.-X X - 1946 Southern California Telephone Co.-X X - 1945 Western Directory Co.-X X - 1941 Southern California Telephone Co.-X X - 1936 Western Directory Co.-X X - 1930 Western Directory Co.-X X - 1926 Pacific Telephone ---- 1925 Western Directory Co.-X X - 1922 Western Directory Co.-X X - 1921 Western Directory Co.---- 1920 Santa Ana Directory Co.---- 5417961-5 Page 2 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. GLASSELL ST S 574 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Kims Fanily Restaurant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mr K Restr & Buffeteria Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. S Glassell St 574 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 YEN CHING RESTAURANT EDR Digital Archive 2010 YEN CHING RESTAURANT EDR Digital Archive 2005 YEN CHING RESTAURANT EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 574 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1991 YEN CHING RESTAURANT Pacific Bell 1980 Yen Ching Restaurant Pacific Telephone 1975 VILLA SWEDEN RESTAURANT Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 MR T CLEANERS Pacific Telephone Mr T Restaurant Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 3 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. E FAIRWAY DR 141 E FAIRWAY DR Year Uses Source 1970 Res I General Telephone Co., of California Hess John B podtrst General Telephone Co., of California E LA PATHA AVE 125 E LA PATHA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Fords Nice & Clean Pacific Telephone E LA VETA AVE 101 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Arroyo Case Apartments Pacific Bell 125 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1986 Moody Ed Pacific Bell 128 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Davis V S Pacific Bell 1975 Atkins Nellie L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 150 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Winston D K Pacific Bell 195 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Bates E E Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 4 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 222 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1986 Cowan Jessie Pacific Bell 1980 Cowan Jessie Pacific Telephone 1975 Cowan Jessie Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 226 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Kitselman Kent Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 0101 E LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Dong Eugene K Pacific Bell Dong Eric Pacific Bell E LA VETA DR 127 E LA VETA DR Year Uses Source 1970 Paino SJa General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Paino Jas Pacific Telephone 128 E LA VETA DR Year Uses Source 1970 Atkins Nellie L General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Atkins Nellie L Pacific Telephone 1955 Shuck Jay T The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 134 E LA VETA DR Year Uses Source 1966 Hall G W Pacific Telephone 222 E LA VETA DR Year Uses Source 1970 Cowan E R General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Cowan E R Pacific Telephone 1955 Cowan E R The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 226 E LA VETA DR Year Uses Source 1970 Hunt J Randall General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Williamson Asia The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 5 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 233 E LA VETA DR Year Uses Source 1970 Pollard Rosa M General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Wimbush Michael R Pacific Telephone E RIVER 126 E RIVER Year Uses Source 1966 Jones Stanley E Pacific Telephone 139 E RIVER Year Uses Source 1941 Harper Chas B r Southern California Telephone Co. 213 E RIVER Year Uses Source 1941 Wacker C F r Southern California Telephone Co. E RIVER AVE 110 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1950 De Long Anna r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1936 R S Arguello Western Directory Co. 119 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Sydenstricker Ronald Pacific Bell 1986 Cooper Tom Pacific Bell Gilbert Frank W Pacific Bell Htelb Ma Ik Pacific Bell 1980 Bossia Doug A Pacific Telephone Zimbelman Richard Pacific Telephone Harris P C Pacific Telephone Cooper Tom Pacific Telephone Bossier K Pacific Telephone 1950 Johnson Rosa F r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1936 t John Wanco W L Bloomer Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 6 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 126 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Taylor Mary Pacific Telephone 1970 Jones Stanley E General Telephone Co., of California 1950 Jones Stanley E r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1936 J A Robinson Western Directory Co. 1922 C B Harper Western Directory Co. 127 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Zimbelman Richard A Pacific Bell 1991 Zimbelman Richard A Pacific Bell 1936 J W Lutes Western Directory Co. 129 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1922 In course of construction Western Directory Co. 130 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Reins John & Edith Pacific Bell 1986 Renms John & Edith Pacific Bell 1980 Reinis John & Edith Pacific Telephone 1936 E M Sprinkle Western Directory Co. 1922 0 M Jenkins Western Directory Co. 131 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1955 Turek Norman J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Hall G W r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1936 Martin Luther Western Directory Co. 1922 W H Faerber Western Directory Co. 133 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Duke Carl D Pacific Bell 1986 Duke Carl D Pacific Bell 1980 Kuhl Misty Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 7 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 137 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Moore Nelle General Telephone Co., of California 139 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1950 Harper Chas B r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1936 C B Harper Western Directory Co. 1922 W 0 Hart Western Directory Co. 205 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Deshanes Raymond & Lorna Pacific Bell 1991 Deshanes Raymond & Lorna Pacific Bell 1986 Deshanes Raymond & Lorna Pacific Bell 1950 Widdows Lyle E r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 210 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Hendricks John A H Pacific Bell Hendricks Joe L Pacific Bell Hendricks Jerry Pacific Bell 213 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Spivey Mike Pacific Bell Mc Candless Chas S Pacific Bell 1991 Mc Candless Chas S Pacific Bell 1986 Mc Candless Chas S Pacific Bell 1936 C F Wacker Western Directory Co. 225 E RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Stevens Max G Pacific Bell 1991 Stevens Max G Pacific Bell 1986 Stevens Max G Pacific Bell 1980 Stevens Max G Pacific Telephone 1936 M J Bauer Western Directory Co. G S Harper Western Directory Co. 1922 G S Harper Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 8 Year Uses Source FINDINGS FAIRWAY DR E 107 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 108 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Kaplan EL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 109 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Pinnon JN Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 110 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Carney June Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 111 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Borshum r SJ Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 112 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Audet DA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 113 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Henderson JJ I Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 114 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Campbell RE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 115 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Lambert Mary Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 116 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Konvalinka WJ Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 9 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 117 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 118 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 119 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 120 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Martin HW Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 121 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Miller LE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 122 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Maddox MEMrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 123 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 124 FAIRWAY DR E Year Uses Source 1965 Powell BEMrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. FAIRWAY LN 110 FAIRWAY LN Year Uses Source 1965 CDC PIPER Ross Publications, Inc., 5417961-5 Page 10 Year Uses Source FINDINGS FAIRWAY PL 124 FAIRWAY PL Year Uses Source 1970 Cox Patricia General Telephone Co., of California Fashion Park 563 Fashion Park Year Uses Source 2005 ACTION AUTOMOTIVE CONCEPTS EDR Digital Archive 607 Fashion Park Year Uses Source 2005 BOOKCULTURE EDR Digital Archive 617 Fashion Park Year Uses Source 2005 JEREH MOBILE DETAIL EDR Digital Archive GLASSELL ST S 474 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Wise KR I Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 477 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Carlson Elsie W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Mrs H K Carlson Western Directory Co. 1936 Mrs H K Carlson Western Directory Co. 1925 Gustave Carlson Western Directory Co. 482 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Wacker DD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 483 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Condon Margery 2103 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 5417961-5 Page 11 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 484 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 St Andre Elmira Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 485 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Bobs Flying A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Fullerton Ellen Mrs 2103 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 488 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Jones Van Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jones Van Serv Assoc tax Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Vacant Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 V W Baden Western Directory Co. 1936 Mrs Mamie Kogler Western Directory Co. 1925 W 3 Kogler Western Directory Co. 1922 W J Kogler Western Directory Co. 493 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Wilder R A 317 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 H A Graber Western Directory Co. 1936 H A Graber Western Directory Co. 1925 H A Graber Western Directory Co. 1922 H A Graber Western Directory Co. 503 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Orange Park Realty Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Hampton R J 1798 a M Luskeys Directory Service Co. 504 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1925 Vacant Western Directory Co. 505 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Moll Shirley Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 12 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 508 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Weingart SR Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 509 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Medicz Edw Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 514 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Kims Family Restr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 520 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Pomaville LH Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 521 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Davis CC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 525 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Linnert RE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Welch R H 1475 a R Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 R H Welch Western Directory Co. 530 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 lioly Family Catholic 538 48 T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holy Family Catholic School Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holy Family Catholic Chwuch Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Holy Family School Luskeys Directory Service Co. 533 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Mac Farlane LK Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 535 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1922 Vacant Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 13 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 537 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Kandrac JJ Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Russell RL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Lackey L F Mrs Luskeys Directory Service Co. 539 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Bixby HS Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 541 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Parsons Mary Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Ahlmann J L Mrs 725 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 545 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Demos GD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 550 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Hindman C C 225 a M Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 W C Fallis Western Directory Co. Mrs O G Devereaux Western Directory Co. 1936 Mrs 0 G Deveraux Western Directory Co. Margt Gardner Western Directory Co. 1925 D R Gardner Western Directory Co. 1922 D R Gardner Western Directory Co. 576 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Holo Wai Miniature Golf Course Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holo Wai Mntr Golf Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 601 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Smith AW Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 605 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Kamber KT Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 14 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 611 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Wright JC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 615 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 No Return Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 618 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Allen CJ Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 619 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Papalexis Anita Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Brunell RP Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 627 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Lichnouski M A Mrs Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 H B Downey Western Directory Co. 1936 Vacant Western Directory Co. 629 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Brooks CL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Vickers H B Mrs 354 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Wm Vickers Western Directory Co. 1936 C W Pulley Western Directory Co. 1925 A C Loomis Western Directory Co. 1922 M T Turner Western Directory Co. 631 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Keith RR Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Smith AE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Westover TJ Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Bullock T H 225 a R Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Mrs M G Deakins Western Directory Co. 1936 S M Higgins Western Directory Co. J G Stokes Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 15 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1925 WV W Spurlock Western Directory Co. 1922 B C Thayer Western Directory Co. 632 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Armstrong AG Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 633 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Hudspeth H J Jr Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 J P Ward Western Directory Co. 1936 WM Fox Western Directory Co. 1925 Vacant Western Directory Co. 635 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 No Return Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1936 Vacant Western Directory Co. City Park Western Directory Co. Orange Agricultural Pest Western Directory Co. Control & Supply Assn Western Directory Co. S J Botts Western Directory Co. Henry Urban Western Directory Co. Edwd Baker Western Directory Co. Jack Kelly Western Directory Co. W V Jeffries Western Directory Co. Danl La Mont A H Kent Western Directory Co. 1925 R J Fyffe Western Directory Co. 1922 R J Fyfee Western Directory Co. 639 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1925 H I Sides Western Directory Co. 641 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Curry IL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 16 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 642 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Yates RG Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 643 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Peralta Robt Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Perez EF Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 645 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 647 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 No Return Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 655 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Watson KE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Watson K E Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 K E Watson Western Directory Co. 537 1/2 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Bixby Hallie Mrs 0959 a R Luskeys Directory Service Co. 539 1/2 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Miller R R 959 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 631 1/2 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Wilson M L Mrs Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Irvin Sherrill Western Directory Co. 633 1/2 GLASSELL ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Jaussaud A C Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Vacant Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 17 Year Uses Source FINDINGS LA VETA AVE E 121 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1952 Reiter Freda IV 1 1928 ac Luskeys Directory Service Co. 127 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1965 Paino Theresa Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 128 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1965 Atkins Nellie Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 134 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1965 Hall GW Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 140 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1952 Yardley F J 2025 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 202 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1952 Parsons M 1 R a 747 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 206 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1952 Hardisty H S 0577 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 214 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1952 Moore E E 4 47 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 222 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1965 Cowan ER Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Cowan E R Luskeys Directory Service Co. Shirley R N Luskeys Directory Service Co. 5417961-5 Page 18 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 226 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1965 King EC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Williamson A MI Mrs Luskeys Directory Service Co. 230 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1952 Dowdy 11 H M Luskeys Directory Service Co. 233 LA VETA AVE E Year Uses Source 1965 Wimbush SJ Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. LA VETA AVE W 121 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Heim Edna Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 126 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Holy Family Convent Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 200 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 No Return Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Strange DJ Rev Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holy Family Catholic Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 205 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Cote W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 206 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 207 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Essenpreis AM Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 19 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 209 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 No Return Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 215 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 0e Bara Tony W 17 it BBte U T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 222 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Twa Va Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 230 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Cruz Reggie Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 233 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 No Return Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 235 LA VETA AVE W Year Uses Source 1965 Cadmus CB Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. OLIVE ST S 475 OLIVE ST S Year Uses Source 1945 H M Clancy Western Directory Co. 477 OLIVE ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Hodgson D W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 484 OLIVE ST S Year Uses Source 1945 R N Pollock Western Directory Co. 485 OLIVE ST S Year Uses Source 1945 Edgar OConnell Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 20 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 495 OLIVE ST S Year Uses Source 1945 C O Dale Western Directory Co. ORANGE ST S 482 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Moseley MM Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 484 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Spiering Agnes Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 485 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Cole EL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Graber R E 897 a R Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 R E Graber Western Directory Co. 1936 Mrs Ellen Utz Western Directory Co. 486 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 No Return Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 488 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Jones EC Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 492 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Sohxe EH Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 493 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Neils COF Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Potter G R 310 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Mrs B W Potter Western Directory Co. 1936 G W Whitsell Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 21 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 510 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Meyer EL Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Ahern Drennan KI 3 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 515 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Hopnran FA Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Hopman F A Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Emma A A Thalheim Western Directory Co. 1936 Frank Schoenheider Western Directory Co. 518 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Jahle GE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Parsons G S 1779 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 525 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Vacant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Linnert R E 2050 a R Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 E D Bartlett Western Directory Co. 1936 Mrs V C Erickson is A E Ralph Western Directory Co. 528 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Rowean JW Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Stephan P J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 P P Turley Western Directory Co. 1936 E W Berry Western Directory Co. 535 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 8lgelow BL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Wood C A 1367 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 C A Wood Western Directory Co. 1936 J C Adams Western Directory Co. 544 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Harper C B 444 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 5417961-5 Page 22 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1945 Leon Henderson Western Directory Co. 545 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Trowett JH 1 R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Bronkend Amelia Mrs Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Mrs Amelia Bronkend Western Directory Co. 1936 N H Meuller Western Directory Co. 604 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Hohe ML Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Mc Shaine J D 1042 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 H W Cathey Western Directory Co. 1936 Robt Fernandez Oscar Klammer Western Directory Co. 609 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 now Olive Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Snow H J 2174 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 H J Snow Western Directory Co. 1936 H J Snow Western Directory Co. 612 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Garrison RE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Garrison R E Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 R E Garrison Western Directory Co. 1936 F A Dowdy Western Directory Co. 615 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Barnrcs Artht Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Reed H L 2193 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 C V Looney Western Directory Co. 1936 W B Hampton Western Directory Co. 620 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Betschart F Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 23 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1952 Havens M E Mrs 2174 a W Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Mrs M E Havens Western Directory Co. 1936 Mrs M E Havens Western Directory Co. 621 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 !2 Willidlms RG Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. i Mc Guirc U Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Baokr AJ Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Baker A J Mrs Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Mrs A J Baker Western Directory Co. 1936 P H Baker Western Directory Co. 622 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Johnsun Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 624 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Elsrrr Russell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Draper E W Mrs 1766 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1936 L P Isaacs Western Directory Co. 626 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Frye IM Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Frye I M Mrs 1042 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Mrs I M Frye Western Directory Co. 1936 R S Frye Western Directory Co. 629 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Intorf L H 444 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 L H Intorf Western Directory Co. 1936 L H Intorf Western Directory Co. 636 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 Vani Darro UT Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Bouck W E 2193 a J Luskeys Directory Service Co. 5417961-5 Page 24 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1945 W E Bouck Western Directory Co. 1936 Mrs S M Davis beauty shop Western Directory Co. H J Davis Western Directory Co. 649 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1965 & 1 4 i S a i Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Moses Carl Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 621 1/2 ORANGE ST S Year Uses Source 1952 Bennett J B Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1945 Ethel L Helliwell Western Directory Co. RIVER 131 RIVER Year Uses Source 1941 Luther M r Southern California Telephone Co. 225 RIVER Year Uses Source 1941 Harper Margaret Rowlands r Southern California Telephone Co. RIVER AVE 104 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 PATRICKSIevpn Haines Company 106 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 SCHIERER T Haines Company 109 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 DELACRUZVelene Haines Company Guyherme L DODDaved Haines Company DEMOURANET Haines Company 5417961-5 Page 25 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 110 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1952 Henderson W F 1798 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 119 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 McVeigh Flora F Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Percival L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Powers Catherine Mrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Percival L Pacific Telephone Powers Catherine Mrs Pacific Telephone 1965 Palm Sigrid Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Aparbuents Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Johnson R F Mrs 0883 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. Clow Gladys Mrs 2211 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. Stephan R V Luskeys Directory Service Co. Hustedde H W Luskeys Directory Service Co. APARTMENTS Luskeys Directory Service Co. 126 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Angel John L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1965 Jones SE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Jones S E piano turner 0963 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 127 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Bradney Leslie L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Bradney Leslie L Pacific Telephone 1965 Bradney LL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Bradney L L Luskeys Directory Service Co. 130 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Reinis John Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Reinis John Pacific Telephone 1965 Reinis John Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Hertrick C J 1367 a}Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1950 Hertrick Chas J r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 26 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 131 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Dee Rick Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Harper Frank E Pacific Telephone Robinson Emma Pacific Telephone 1965 Robinson Emma Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Hall G W 2211 a}Luskeys Directory Service Co. 133 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Hanmer Wm G Pacific Telephone 137 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1965 Moore Nell Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Gammon Claude Luskeys Directory Service Co. 139 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Foster Mary M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Foster Rod Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Bullock Agnes R Pacific Telephone 1965 Bullock VE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Astone T C Luskeys Directory Service Co. 201 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 KELLEY Gregory J Haines Company 1980 Gutierrez Lynn S Pacific Telephone Gutierrez Pacific Telephone 205 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Leutzinger Mark Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Dowling Edw J Jr Pacific Telephone 1965 Mc Candless Fredrick Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Wade W F 2211 a I Luskeys Directory Service Co. 206 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 LOHSERSIeve Haines Company 5417961-5 Page 27 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 209 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 AVERSAJoseph Haines Company 210 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1965 Morner Ada Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Fertig H R 2125 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 212 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1965 Larson Ruth Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Larson Ruby P Luskeys Directory Service Co. 213 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 WOMACKWade Z Haines Company WILLIAMSONMark Haines Company TERASHIMANonyoshi Haines Company SPARACINOBryan Haines Company 1975 McCandless Chas S Jr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Francis John H Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Stanley C W Jr Pacific Telephone 1965 Mc Candless CS Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mc Candless CS tile contr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Mc Candless C S Jr tilecntr Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1950 Mc Candless Chas S Jr tile contr The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Mc Candless C S Jr r Southern California Telephone Co. 218 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 GREYCarla J Haines Company HEARTWELLDamien Haines Company 221 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 MILLSJel Haines Company MILLSMrlch Haines Company 5417961-5 Page 28 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 222 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 2002 GRANT Margarelann Haines Company ECONOMOSNok V Haines Company 225 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Stevens Max G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Kendall Richard V First Methodist Church of Orange Pacific Telephone Res Pacific Telephone 1965 First Methodist Church Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kendall RV Rev Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1952 Harper G S 444 a Luskeys Directory Service Co. 1950 Harper Geo S Mrs r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Trevorrow Raymond G r Southern California Telephone Co. Harper Geo S Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. 213 1/2 RIVER AVE Year Uses Source 1952 Spivey V L Luskeys Directory Service Co. RIVER AVE E 110 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 K K Killingsworth Western Directory Co. 119 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 G H Hammontree Western Directory Co. J A Johnson Western Directory Co. R P Urban Western Directory Co. Harold Wasco Western Directory Co. 1925 M K Baessler H 0 Randal Western Directory Co. 124 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1925 R S Arguello Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 29 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 126 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 N V Goodwin Western Directory Co. 1925 David Hanson Western Directory Co. 127 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 L L Bradney Western Directory Co. 1925 T G Appel Western Directory Co. 130 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 F H Abney Western Directory Co. 1925 J F Williamson Western Directory Co. 131 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 G W Hall Western Directory Co. 1925 L H Charbonneau Western Directory Co. 137 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 C E Ostrander Western Directory Co. 139 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 C B Harper Western Directory Co. 1925 C 13 Harper Western Directory Co. 210 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 Ruth L Larson Western Directory Co. 212 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 A G Pennita Western Directory Co. 213 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 C S McCandless Western Directory Co. 1925 R L Valentine Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 30 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 225 RIVER AVE E Year Uses Source 1945 Mrs M R Harper Western Directory Co. 1925 G S Harper Western Directory Co. S Fashion Park St 573 S Fashion Park St Year Uses Source 2010 KITCHELL HEAT & A/C EDR Digital Archive 2005 KITCHELL HEAT & A/C EDR Digital Archive 585 S Fashion Park St Year Uses Source 2010 ZARRILLI ZACK EDR Digital Archive SUREFIRE CPR EDR Digital Archive 607 S Fashion Park St Year Uses Source 2010 BOOKCULTURE EDR Digital Archive 617 S Fashion Park St Year Uses Source 2014 JEREH MOBILE DETAIL EDR Digital Archive 2010 JEREH MOBILE DETAIL EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 480 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Ontkean Mark J DC Glassell Chirprctc Centr Pacific Bell 1991 Glassell Chiropractic Center Pacific Bell 1986 Ontkean Mark Dr DC Pacific Bell 1980 Schauer Jack Pacific Telephone 1975 Ferraro Cosimo Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Powell Lynda W General Telephone Co., of California Powell John P General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Mc Cluskey Kenneth M Jr Pacific Telephone 1955 Morrison W J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 31 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 481 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 K&BMalrket Pacific Bell 1980 Orange Pacific Telephone 482 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1980 Wright C Young III Pacific Telephone 1975 Tye Marie Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Phelps Warren H The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 483 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1955 Bailey Louis The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 484 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1986 J T C Productions Pacific Bell 1955 Moore Walter F Dr The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 485 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1966 Glassell & La Veta Pacific Telephone Phillips 66 Service Stations anaheim Pacific Telephone 1955 Cole Ellen Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Res The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 488 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1991 Jones L Van Service Associates Pacific Bell Service Associates Pacific Bell Van Jones Service Associates Pacific Bell 1986 Service Associates Pacific Bell 1980 Jones Van Service Associates Pacific Telephone Service Associates Pacific Telephone 1975 Jones Van Service Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Service Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Service Asher E Mrs General Telephone Co., of California Stekc Associates General Telephone Co., of California Jones Van Service Associates General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Limb The Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 32 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1966 Jones Van Service Associate prntrs Pacific Telephone 1955 Clark Cecil The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Scott John O r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Baden V W r Southern California Telephone Co. 1941 Katella Hatchery Southern California Telephone Co. ogler Mamie Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. 493 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1955 Rymer Helen Hope The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Wilder R A r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. S Glassell St 503 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 SMITH GREG EDR Digital Archive HAUCK PETER E EDR Digital Archive BIDDLE JEFF A EDR Digital Archive BRUCE E COLODNY LAW OFFICES EDR Digital Archive 2010 HAUCK PETER E EDR Digital Archive SMITH GREG EDR Digital Archive BIDDLE JEFF A EDR Digital Archive 2005 COLODNY BRUCE LAW OFFICE OF EDR Digital Archive JUSTICE FOR FATHERS EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 503 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Jaquith Gary atty Pacific Bell 1980 Medi Van Ambulette Corp Pacific Telephone California Medical Transportation Association Pacific Telephone 1975 Danner Paving Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Kirby Leo E General Telephone Co., of California Schultz Lee ri est General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Orange Park Realty Pacific Telephone KIRBY LEO E Orange Park Realty Pacific Telephone 1955 Hampton Bob J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 33 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1950 Hampton Bob J r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. S Glassell St 525 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2010 LINNERT VEHICLE SERVICES EDR Digital Archive 2005 LINNERT VEHICLE SERVICES EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 525 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Linnert Vehicle Services Pacific Bell 1991 Linnert Vehicle Services Pacific Bell Linnert Ralph E Pacific Bell 1986 Linnert Ralph E Pacific Bell 1975 Linnert Ralph E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Linnert Ralph E General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Linnert Ralph E Pacific Telephone 1955 Welch Ray H The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Welch Ray H r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Welch Ray H r Southern California Telephone Co. 1941 Welch Ray H r Southern California Telephone Co. S Glassell St 530 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL SCHOOL EDR Digital Archive ROMAN CTHLIC DIOCESE OF ORANGE EDR Digital Archive PERFORMANCE TRAINING EDR Digital Archive 2010 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHP OF ORANGE EDR Digital Archive DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION EDR Digital Archive DIRECTOR OF MUSIC MINISTRIES EDR Digital Archive 2005 DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION EDR Digital Archive DIRECTOR OF MUSIC MINISTRIES EDR Digital Archive ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHP OF ORANGE EDR Digital Archive 5417961-5 Page 34 Year Uses Source FINDINGS S GLASSELL ST 530 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Catholic Deaf Community Voice Pacific Bell Director Of Adult Education Pacific Bell Director Of Music Ministries Pacific Bell Holy Family Cathedral Catholic Pacific Bell Parish Sister Pacific Bell 1991 Parish Susan J Pacific Bell Parish Sister Pacific Bell Director Of Music Ministries Pacific Bell Director Of Adult Education Pacific Bell Catholic Deaf Outreach Service Voice Pacific Bell Catholic Deaf Outreach Service Tdd Pacific Bell Catholic Deaf Community Voice Pacific Bell Parish Timothy & Colleen @Huntington Beach@ Pacific Bell 1980 Holy Family Director Religious Education Pacific Telephone Holy Family Catholic School Pacific Telephone Holy Family C CD Pacific Telephone 1975 Holy Family School Health Room Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holy Family Catholic School Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Holy Family School Health Room General Telephone Co., of California Holy Family Catholic School General Telephone Co., of California 1966 HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL Pacific Telephone 1955 Holy Family Catholic School The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Holy Family Catholic School The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 537 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1975 Russell Raymond L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Loughrey Jas J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Loughrey Jas J General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Russell Raymond L Pacific Telephone 1955 Purcell Virginia A Dr The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Bixby Hallie S Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 De Cloud John Capt r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 35 Year Uses Source FINDINGS S Glassell St 539 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2010 CATHYS LEATHER & SUEDES EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 539 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Hernandez Hector Pacific Bell 1991 Hernandez Hector Pacific Bell 1986 Hernandez Hector Pacific Bell 1980 araves obt Pacific Telephone 1975 Brick P R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Pflueger Emma C Mrs General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Smith Stuart The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Miller Richard R Lt r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 541 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1970 Parsons Mary A General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Parsons Mary A Pacific Telephone 1955 Crossley W S The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Ahlmann W C Mrs r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 550 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1955 Whitford Geo W The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Fallis W C r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Devereaux Orra r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Deveraux Orra r Southern California Telephone Co. 1941 Devereaux Orra r Southern California Telephone Co. S Glassell St 566 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL EDR Digital Archive 2010 HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL EDR Digital Archive 2005 HOLY CATHERRAL EDR Digital Archive 5417961-5 Page 36 Year Uses Source FINDINGS S GLASSELL ST 566 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Holy Family Catholic Church Pacific Bell 1991 Holy Family Catholic Church Pacific Bell Holy Family Cathedral Pacific Bell Holy Family Cathedral Catholic Pacific Bell 1986 Holy Family Catholic Church Pacific Bell Horan George E Pacific Bell 1980 Holy Family Cathedral Catholic Pacific Telephone Holy Family Catholic Church Pacific Telephone 1975 Holy Family Catholic Church Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE HOLY FAMILY Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holy Family C C D Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Holy Family C C O General Telephone Co., of California Holy Family Catholic Church General Telephone Co., of California Lowell Katherin General Telephone Co., of California ROMAN CATHOIUC CHURCH OF THE HOLY FAMILY General Telephone Co., of California 1966 HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH Pacific Telephone 576 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1975 Orange Miniature Golf Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holo Wai Miniature Golf Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Holo Wai Miniature Golf General Telephone Co., of California Orange Miniature Golf General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Orange Miniature Golf Pacific Telephone Holo Wai Miniature Golf Pacific Telephone S Glassell St 603 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2005 FITOVERS EYEWEAR PTY LIMITED EDR Digital Archive 5417961-5 Page 37 Year Uses Source FINDINGS S GLASSELL ST 615 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1986 Reta Grace P Pacific Bell 1975 Reta Grace P Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 617 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1975 Rosa Robt W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. S Glassell St 620 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 KISCO SENIOR LIVING LLC EDR Digital Archive BETHS AT PARK PLAZA EDR Digital Archive 2010 BETHS AT PARK PLAZA EDR Digital Archive KISCO SENIOR LIVING LLC EDR Digital Archive 2005 KISCO SENIOR LIVING LLC EDR Digital Archive BETHS AT PARK PLAZA EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 620 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Ahern Martha A Pacific Bell Beebe Irma A Pacific Bell Bergen Berenice Mrs Pacific Bell Beths At Park Plaza Pacific Bell Buckmaster G E Pacific Bell Consalvo Elsa Pacific Bell Cook Fred Pacific Bell De La Riva Gloria Pacific Bell Eckel Marla J Pacific Bell Erskine L Pacific Bell Fowler V Pacific Bell Fry Charles W Pacific Bell Gabloffsky Heinz Pacific Bell Gay F H Pacific Bell Grant Mary B Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 38 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Gulledge Jewel E Pacific Bell Hanson Josephine Pacific Bell Hardy Doyle Pacific Bell Harrington M L Pacific Bell Hartmann Maudell Pacific Bell Hawkins F V Pacific Bell Henry Jennie Pacific Bell Holm Roy Pacific Bell Horan Thomas P Pacific Bell Houpt J Wm Pacific Bell House Leland R Pacific Bell Jefferies I E Pacific Bell Johnson Warren C Sr Pacific Bell Keske Amold W Pacific Bell Miller MV Pacific Bell Oliver Neva Pacific Bell PARK PLAZA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE Pacific Bell Pearson RR Pacific Bell Pickel lona A Pacific Bell Piroli Fanny Pacific Bell Pitcher Laurence Pacific Bell Ritchie SB Pacific Bell Seeds CE Pacific Bell Sperling Jack MD Pacific Bell Still GA & Mildred Pacific Bell Taylor Ann Pacific Bell Vanderlip Ted Pacific Bell Wilkin Ruth E Pacific Bell Zike Mary Pacific Bell 1991 Barker Carl Pacific Bell Biegler Elmer L Pacific Bell Bradley Arlie Pacific Bell Brooks FL Pacific Bell Brown E Pacific Bell Burgwald H M Jr Pacific Bell Casino Frank Pacific Bell Casino MJ Pacific Bell Castillo Lillian D Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 39 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Cohen G G Pacific Bell Cohen Gary Pacific Bell Consalvo Elsa Pacific Bell Consalvo ID Pacific Bell Consani David & Kimn Pacific Bell Curtis Dale V Pacific Bell Daly Howard Pacific Bell di Tona Helen Pacific Bell Forbes B R Pacific Bell Godfrey Lois H Pacific Bell Godfrey M Pacific Bell Godfrey MS Pacific Bell Guichet F L Pacific Bell Gulledge Jewel E Pacific Bell Hanson Josephine Pacific Bell Harrison Louise W Pacific Bell Hartmann Maudell Pacific Bell Hawkins F V Pacific Bell Henderson C A Pacific Bell Henry Jennie Pacific Bell Hersey S Pacific Bell Houpt J Wm Pacific Bell Johnson Aileen Jeisy Pacific Bell Jolley G E Pacific Bell Kanarek Gladys Pacific Bell Kanarek M Pacific Bell Kanarek Shepard S S Pacific Bell Kordos Jennie Pacific Bell Mc Caffrey Charles Pacific Bell Merrtt L Pacific Bell Miller Joseph M Jr Pacific Bell Olson B V Pacific Bell PARK PLAZA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE Pacific Bell Phillips Joseph Pacific Bell Piroli Fanny Pacific Bell Pitcher Laurence Pacific Bell Pitcher Michael Pacific Bell Porter Dorothy M Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 40 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Rodriguez Jesus & Gay Pacific Bell Ronk Isabelle Pacific Bell Shamrehl Freda Pacific Bell Shamrel J Pacific Bell Smith Gwynavere Mrs Pacific Bell Stern Ernest & Liza Pacific Bell Stone L M Pacific Bell Strickland James A Pacific Bell Stuffler Frank N Cdr Pacific Bell Teigan B L Pacific Bell Teigen Edward & Tammy Pacific Bell Webster Avis R Pacific Bell Winning G M Pacific Bell S Glassell St 625 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2010 ZECHARIAHS EDR Digital Archive 2005 ZECHARIAHS EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 628 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1991 Beckett Leland R Pacific Bell 629 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1975 Fenner W L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Vickers Hattie B Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Vickers Wm r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Vickers Wm r Southern California Telephone Co. S Glassell St 630 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 WOLVERINE ENVIRONMENTAL INC EDR Digital Archive DENNISON & ASSOC EDR Digital Archive 5417961-5 Page 41 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 DINEEN PANATTONI EDR Digital Archive PHILLIPS AUTOMOTIVE INC EDR Digital Archive GEORGE N UJKIC DC INC EDR Digital Archive ANGELA THERESE ARENDT MA LMFT EDR Digital Archive HAPENNY LTD NUMBER 1 A CA EDR Digital Archive BERNAL IRENE LCSW EDR Digital Archive HERRMMAN ANGELA MD EDR Digital Archive MARCUS ETTINGER DC EDR Digital Archive JD SYSTEMS CONSULTING EDR Digital Archive HERRMAN ANGELA MD EDR Digital Archive 2010 HERRMAN ANGELA MD EDR Digital Archive STANDARD DETOX GROUP INC EDR Digital Archive ARKONA DIANOSTIC SERVICES EDR Digital Archive JD SYSTEMS CONSULTING EDR Digital Archive AREVALOS FRED EDR Digital Archive HERRMMAN ANGELA MD EDR Digital Archive HAPENNY LTD NUMBER 1 A CA EDR Digital Archive BERNAL IRENE LCSW EDR Digital Archive LITEHOUS INC EDR Digital Archive INTERCORE INC EDR Digital Archive LAW OFFICE OF JULIE L RESNER EDR Digital Archive AMETHYST THERAPY EDR Digital Archive ORANGE RANCH PHYSICAL THERAPY EDR Digital Archive GEORGE N UJKIC DC INC EDR Digital Archive M CANNON AND B CHLUPEK A CH EDR Digital Archive MARKEN WORLDWIDE EXPRESS EDR Digital Archive DENNISON & ASSOC EDR Digital Archive WOLVERINE ENVIRONMENTAL INC EDR Digital Archive MARK DROLLINGER EDR Digital Archive 2005 CARRIAGE STOP INVESTMENTS INC EDR Digital Archive LAWRENCE DELANO TRAN MD A MEDI EDR Digital Archive MARK DROLLINGER EDR Digital Archive LOPEZ & CO EDR Digital Archive WOLVERINE ENVIRONMENTAL INC EDR Digital Archive DENNISON & ASSOC EDR Digital Archive CAPITAL CHARTERS ACQUISITIONS EDR Digital Archive EXEL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES EDR Digital Archive MILLENNIUM MEDICAL MANAGEMENT EDR Digital Archive 5417961-5 Page 42 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2005 ORANGE COUNTY BICYL COALITION EDR Digital Archive HERRMMAN ANGELA MD EDR Digital Archive CORMORANT ORTHAPAEDIC MEDICAL EDR Digital Archive WALLACE PATTI MA ATR BC EDR Digital Archive UJKIC GEORGE N DC EDR Digital Archive M CANNON AND B CHLUPEK A CH EDR Digital Archive MY CAR AGENT EDR Digital Archive PRICE LAPTOPS LOW EDR Digital Archive FINE FORM EDR Digital Archive FASTRACK REMARKETING INC EDR Digital Archive AREVALOS FRED EDR Digital Archive PHYSICAL THERAPY REHAB CENTER EDR Digital Archive FAMILY DEV COUNSELING CTR EDR Digital Archive HERRMANN MD ANGELA INC EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 630 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 U kic George N DC Pacific Bell Sandoval Joseph A CPA Pacific Bell Orange County Bicycle Coalition Pacific Bell Lopez & Company Pacific Bell Harvest Financial Group Pacific Bell Diversion Intervention Centers Pacific Bell Coast Leasing Pacific Bell Capital Charters & Acquisition Inc Pacific Bell Cannon Marah DC Pacific Bell Business CDC Inc Pacific Bell August Vollmer University Pacific Bell Asset Tracking Systems Pacific Bell A am Motors Pacific Bell 1991 Norrell Health Care Services Pacific Bell Coast Leasing Pacific Bell 1986 Anaheim Plaza Building Pacific Bell Camino Real Savings & Loan Assoc Pacific Bell Phi Enterprises Inc Pacific Bell Phelan Securities Inc Pacific Bell Phelan Hotel Company Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 43 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Innkeepers Ltd Pacific Bell HPI Management Co Inc Pacific Bell H P I MAN AGE ME N T CO Pacific Bell 1980 V I MAN AGE ME N T CO Pacific Telephone V I Hotel Corp Pacific Telephone Anaheim Plaza Building Pacific Telephone 631 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Pelayo Alfredo Pacific Bell 1991 Mendez Lucina Pacific Bell 1986 Hams R Pacific Bell 1966 Keith Ralph Pacific Telephone 1955 Currie Wm J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Bullock Lawrence R r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Mc Cutcheon W C r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Field Fenn B r Southern California Telephone Co. 633 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1991 Salce Mar Io Pacific Bell 1975 McCoy Danl Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Carter Robt J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Wiese S M Mrs r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. S Glassell St 640 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 OCONNER DEBORAH SNELL EDR Digital Archive 2010 OCONNER DEBORAH SNELL EDR Digital Archive 2005 OCONNER DEBORAH SNELL EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 640 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Orange Outreach Pacific Bell Flem Ing Lynne LCSW Pacific Bell 1980 Iba Diiie Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 44 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 641 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1991 White R Pacific Bell 1980 Jensen Wm R Pacific Telephone 1966 Nielsen L E Pacific Telephone 643 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1975 Campbell Eric M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Forbess Douglas D General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Greenberg W R Pacific Telephone 645 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1966 Ferris Kenneth Pacific Telephone 647 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1966 Heim Lawrence F Pacific Telephone 655 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Watson Kellar E Pacific Bell 1991 Watson Kellar E Pacific Bell Watson Kelhe L Pacific Bell 1980 Watson Kellar E Pacific Telephone 1975 Watson Kellar E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Watson Kellar E General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Watson Kellar E Pacific Telephone 1955 Watson Kellar E Jr The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Watson Kellar E Jr r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Watson Kellar E Jr r Southern California Telephone Co. S Glassell St 660 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 STERLING SECURITY SYSTEMS DALE EDR Digital Archive P C AND LOGISTICS LLC EDR Digital Archive CLEAN TERMITE CONTROL EDR Digital Archive TEX-SKY PROPERTIES LLC EDR Digital Archive 5417961-5 Page 45 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 FOCUZ INTERPRETING EDR Digital Archive 2010 FOCUZ INTERPRETING EDR Digital Archive ROM TRANS EDR Digital Archive PASCUCI CLAUDIU EDR Digital Archive BIRD SONG MEDIA EDR Digital Archive RENATO BARLES EDR Digital Archive TEX-SKY PROPERTIES LLC EDR Digital Archive PRO-CLEAN POWERWASH EDR Digital Archive GREAT AMERICAN SUPERMARKET EDR Digital Archive UNEMPLOYED EDR Digital Archive CLEAN TERMITE CONTROL EDR Digital Archive P C AND LOGISTICS LLC EDR Digital Archive STERLING SECURITY SYSTEMS DALE EDR Digital Archive 2005 SALCEDO GREGORY W EDR Digital Archive DV8 GUITARS INC EDR Digital Archive BRYAN KAYE IMPEX INC EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 660 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Anderson Dena Pacific Bell Bouyer John R Pacific Bell Buehler Matthew & Tara Pacific Bell Burbank LD Pacific Bell De Lay John Pacific Bell Firchau Thad D Pacific Bell Ida VF Pacific Bell Kim Woo Jung Pacific Bell Lee Scott Pacific Bell Lopez Ruben Pacific Bell Milner James W Pacific Bell Mullenburg Cordell Pacific Bell Murakami Fuyuko Pacific Bell Rubin Martin Pacific Bell Tamayoshi ANAHEIM Pacific Bell 1991 Williams John Pacific Bell Wooten R Pacific Bell Barles Renato Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 46 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Bellamy Randy & Masae Pacific Bell Bellamy Ray W Pacific Bell Blust C D Pacific Bell Bresee Mark & Dawn Pacific Bell Bresenoff Stanley W 7 Pacific Bell Brito John & Vycki Pacific Bell Burbank LD Pacific Bell Burns H L Pacific Bell Christ Margie A Pacific Bell Coen R J Pacific Bell Freeman S Pacific Bell Freeman SJ Pacific Bell Guillen R Pacific Bell Hendrickson Mark L Pacific Bell Herrera Jose Pacific Bell Ida VF Pacific Bell Mcintyre M Pacific Bell Milner James W Pacific Bell Muilenburg Cordell Pacific Bell Mullen R A Pacific Bell Riccitelli Christina Pacific Bell Rolph Stephen J Pacific Bell Rolsen Lan Pacific Bell Rolsheim Richard Pacific Bell Rubln Martin Pacific Bell Sansoucie T Pacific Bell Shults Rg Uss Pacific Bell 1986 Adams Wm E Pacific Bell Ball Kathleen D Pacific Bell Baskette John Pacific Bell Bell David & Margaret Pacific Bell Black M J Pacific Bell Borland Jas R Pacific Bell Cosgrove M Pacific Bell Cox Jerry Pacific Bell Dargatz Robt Rev Pacific Bell Dilzer Jim Pacific Bell Doney D K Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 47 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Dorrington Frank R Pacific Bell Dusenbury J N Pacific Bell Emery Steven E Pacific Bell Gray Danny Pacific Bell Hamilton Steve Pacific Bell Hemandez David Pacific Bell Hughey Ken Pacific Bell Ida VF Pacific Bell Julian Joseph Pacific Bell Loughlin Tom & K J Pacific Bell Manchester Roc E Pacific Bell Masterson J Pacific Bell Mickelson Brian Pacific Bell Miller Jon P Pacific Bell Minor M Pacific Bell Mullen R A Pacific Bell OKeefe P Pacific Bell Piraino Anthony Pacific Bell Rubin Martin Pacific Bell Sanders Alan D Pacific Bell Scott Thomas A Pacific Bell Shea James J Jr Pacific Bell Sigalas Michael Pacific Bell Spitler Richard Pacific Bell Stiles Mike Pacific Bell Stout Brad D Pacific Bell 1980 Arnold A Pacific Telephone Bardon Donald R Pacific Telephone Bardon GL Pacific Telephone Cedar F D Pacific Telephone Doney DK Pacific Telephone Gaylord Jon Pacific Telephone Howard Donald J Pacific Telephone Ida VF Pacific Telephone Kennedy Linda Pacific Telephone Konrad Stephen G Pacific Telephone Lalpple William C Pacific Telephone Lovret L A Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 48 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Lyie Jerry Pacific Telephone Minor M Pacific Telephone Nelson Rick A & Lisa Pacific Telephone Olone Nil Pacific Telephone Park Orleans Apartments Pacific Telephone Park Orleans Association Pacific Telephone Phill Ips Frank Pacific Telephone Schamehorn Phil Pacific Telephone Shea Jim J Jr Pacific Telephone Wegier D Pacific Telephone 1975 Devalle L C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Durham Carolyn L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Finnegan Denis Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Gomez Osvaldo I Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Guest Ruby Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Gwin Leroy E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Haislett Theresa A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hansen Courtney Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Hatter Terry G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holland Geo K Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Holston Greg Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Huizing Ron Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ida V F Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jennings W T M Sgt Ret Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Jones Steven D Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kearney Michael Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kopf Hans Peter Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lack Robt Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Leestma Peter G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lyle Jerry Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Madden Buddy W Jr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Mahon John Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Martin Cyndi Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Martin Jos T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. McDaniel N J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. McMahon Maureen Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. McMahon Sue Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. McMasters John J Jr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 49 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Millen Wm Michael Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Murakami Donald S Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Nevins Frank E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Nieblas Alfred E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Park @Orange@ Apartments Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Parratt Steve R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pietrzak Wm J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Pressnall T M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Quistgard Mitchell P Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rainey Tom Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Richardson David W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rogers Sylvia Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rosen Burton J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ross S Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rowland E J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sakamoto J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Schillo Wm Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Schlueter Karen Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Shane A G Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sheldon Gregory Lee Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sherman Jeffrey R Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Shoda Stephen M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Smith Larry Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Stites Richard M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Stout Dennis Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Stuart Danl Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Tekada Barbara Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Trabant Gary Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Wallner Maurice C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Williams Robt E Jr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Aksland Clifford L Jr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Anderson Bruce L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bandur Deborah J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Baugher Leonard W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bennett Neil F Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Benton Gregory J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Conway Kathy Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Cowan J A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 50 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Dean Robt M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dehoff Rebecca Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dehoff Timothy Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dekal Edwin P Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Hurzeler Donald J General Telephone Co., of California Ida V F General Telephone Co., of California Jacobs Norman G General Telephone Co., of California Jamieson Douglas R General Telephone Co., of California Jurek J S General Telephone Co., of California Mac Hale Richard General Telephone Co., of California Manning J R General Telephone Co., of California Mc Clelland Kathie General Telephone Co., of California Meyers Connie General Telephone Co., of California Norton Kent L General Telephone Co., of California Palmer Judy E General Telephone Co., of California Park Orange General Telephone Co., of California Prennance Art General Telephone Co., of California Ratoike Wilbur H General Telephone Co., of California Reed D Stephen General Telephone Co., of California Robertson Steven General Telephone Co., of California Samuel Judy K General Telephone Co., of California Samuel Martin J General Telephone Co., of California Saros Nick L General Telephone Co., of California Schwartz K A General Telephone Co., of California Shand Garth D General Telephone Co., of California Smiaey Sue General Telephone Co., of California Starner Bryan General Telephone Co., of California Starner Christine A General Telephone Co., of California Strelsky Richard A General Telephone Co., of California Suglmoto Tsuyoslil General Telephone Co., of California Swanson Kristine General Telephone Co., of California Thomas Cathy General Telephone Co., of California Van Uden Mark J General Telephone Co., of California Vaught Robt J General Telephone Co., of California Ward R N General Telephone Co., of California Warner Kerry General Telephone Co., of California Wendt MIDWAY CITY General Telephone Co., of California Williams Gwilym III General Telephone Co., of California 5417961-5 Page 51 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1970 Woodard Nicholas S General Telephone Co., of California Anderson Bruce K General Telephone Co., of California Bell Michel General Telephone Co., of California Blaskey Marion General Telephone Co., of California Boals Barry General Telephone Co., of California Brannan Jas R General Telephone Co., of California Buckley David M General Telephone Co., of California Bullock Harold R General Telephone Co., of California Burbank Rudy General Telephone Co., of California Cantwell Laraine L General Telephone Co., of California Carrillo Walter L General Telephone Co., of California Cartwright Curtis W General Telephone Co., of California Cartwright Gail R General Telephone Co., of California Cronkhiite Edw G General Telephone Co., of California Davis Susan F General Telephone Co., of California Dexter Steve D General Telephone Co., of California Dick Robt W General Telephone Co., of California Dobson Nancy L General Telephone Co., of California Dufore Norman General Telephone Co., of California Dumond Dale B General Telephone Co., of California Feidt Barbara General Telephone Co., of California Flanigan Michael W General Telephone Co., of California Frost Roger F General Telephone Co., of California Gabbard Bill R General Telephone Co., of California Garrett Christine General Telephone Co., of California Gibson COSTA MESA General Telephone Co., of California Hamilton Patrick T General Telephone Co., of California Hamilton Rick General Telephone Co., of California Hart Jessie General Telephone Co., of California Holt Martha General Telephone Co., of California Hose W R General Telephone Co., of California Hubbard Bruce W General Telephone Co., of California Hungerford John A General Telephone Co., of California Hungerford Margaret E General Telephone Co., of California Hurst Suzanne General Telephone Co., of California 5417961-5 Page 52 Year Uses Source FINDINGS S Glassell St 684 S Glassell St Year Uses Source 2014 CADNICKS INC EDR Digital Archive 2010 DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE EDR Digital Archive JEMS ORANGE 76 EDR Digital Archive 2005 JEMS ORANGE 76 EDR Digital Archive DANNY S UNION 76 SERVICE EDR Digital Archive S GLASSELL ST 684 S GLASSELL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Dannys Union Service Pacific Bell Dannys Union Service Pacific Bell Unocal Dealers Service Stations Contd Laguna Beach Pacific Bell Dannys Union Service Pacific Bell Smog Check Stations Contd Orange Pacific Bell 1991 Dannys Union Service Pacific Bell Danny s Union Service Pacific Bell 1986 Dannys Union Service Pacific Bell Higgins Transfer Service Pacific Bell 1980 Maurys Union Service Pacific Telephone 1975 Maurys Union Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Glenns Union Service Pacific Telephone Glenns Union Service Pacific Telephone S OLIVE 495 S OLIVE Year Uses Source 1941 Long G R Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. S OLIVE ST 476 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Barrett Elizabeth A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 5417961-5 Page 53 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 477 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Cebrynski Pacific Telephone 1975 DArcy S E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Smith Christopher A General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Robbins Jas W Pacific Telephone 480 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1991 Stuckey Olen Pacific Bell 1986 Stuckey Olen Pacific Bell 1980 Stuckey Olen Pacific Telephone 1970 Sundquist John W General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Golightly Chas T Pacific Telephone 484 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Papalexis A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Papalexis A General Telephone Co., of California 1930 C C BENNETT Western Directory Co. 1925 C C Bennett Western Directory Co. 1922 C C Bennett Western Directory Co. 485 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Luqueno Luz Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Nunez Francisco B Pacific Telephone Nunez Alice F Pacific Telephone 1930 H-ENRY DIESEL Western Directory Co. 1925 Henry Diesel Western Directory Co. 486 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1995 French Dolores Pacific Bell 1991 French Dolores Pacific Bell 1986 Knowles Martha l Pacific Bell 1975 Malone C Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Hood Jas I Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 54 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 488 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Jackson E Pacific Telephone 1975 Jackson E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 George Lee General Telephone Co., of California 490 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1991 Young Richard A Pacific Bell 1980 Young Richard A Pacific Telephone 1970 Hood Jas$I General Telephone Co., of California 495 S OLIVE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Gonzales Roger & Terri Pacific Telephone 1970 Nunez Francisco General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Mortensen Sorn C Pacific Telephone 1930 J T WILSON Western Directory Co. 1925 Mrs Melissa Long Western Directory Co. 1922 A J Eich Western Directory Co. S ORANGE 493 S ORANGE Year Uses Source 1941 Whitsell G W r Southern California Telephone Co. 525 S ORANGE Year Uses Source 1941 Ralph A E r Southern California Telephone Co. 544 S ORANGE Year Uses Source 1941 Monroe Elizabeth T r Southern California Telephone Co. 615 S ORANGE Year Uses Source 1941 Wallin J D r Southern California Telephone Co. 620 S ORANGE Year Uses Source 1941 Havens A L r Southern California Telephone Co. 5417961-5 Page 55 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 621 S ORANGE Year Uses Source 1941 Baker Artie Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. 629 S ORANGE Year Uses Source 1941 Intorf L H r Southern California Telephone Co. S ORANGE AVE 604 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Hoke Monica D Pacific Telephone 609 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Snow H J Pacific Telephone Trussler A Pacific Telephone 620 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Betschart F J Pacific Telephone 621 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Read Barbara Pacific Telephone Anderson Jacquelyne Pacific Telephone Baker Artie Mrs Pacific Telephone 622 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Slaten Donna Pacific Telephone Slaten John W Jr Pacific Telephone 624 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Trinkaus Earl Pacific Telephone 626 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Frye Ilva M Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 56 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 636 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Van Dame D T Pacific Telephone 649 S ORANGE AVE Year Uses Source 1966 Moses Carl Pacific Telephone S ORANGE ST 482 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Moseley M M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 484 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Coney B A Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Spiering Agnes General Telephone Co., of California 485 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1986 Rasch Philip & Karen Pacific Bell 1975 Rasch Philip E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Stuurmans Gerrit The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Graber Roy E r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1925 John Utz Western Directory Co. 1922 John UTtz Western Directory Co. 488 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Zink Bryan Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 492 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1995 Reiber ML Pacific Bell 1991 Reiber M L Pacific Bell 1986 Reiber M L Pacific Bell 1980 Reiber ML Pacific Telephone 1975 Reiber M L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Sohre Elsie H General Telephone Co., of California 5417961-5 Page 57 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 493 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1991 Nielsen Chas F Pacific Bell 1986 Nielsen Chas F Pacific Bell 1980 Nielsen Chas F Pacific Telephone 1975 Nielsen Chas F Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Nielsen Chas F General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Potter Claude E Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Potter Claude E Mrs r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Potter Claude E Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 G W Whitsell Western Directory Co. 1922 G W Whitsell Western Directory Co. 509 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Capell Alfred L General Telephone Co., of California 510 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1991 Angel John J Pacific Bell 1980 Angel John J Pacific Telephone 1975 Angel John J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Angel John J General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Leininger Wm H The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Ahern Drennan r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 515 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Zwiener Margaret H General Telephone Co., of California Flores E L General Telephone Co., of California 1946 Hopman Elmer F r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 Frank Shoenheider Western Directory Co. 1922 J L Ainsworth Western Directory Co. 518 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Aaron Harold W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1950 Parsons G S r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 58 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 525 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1991 Trebing Michael Pacific Bell 1950 Linnert Ralph E r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Bartlett E D r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 Theo Erickson Western Directory Co. 1922 R E Hostetler Western Directory Co. 528 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Welch Sharon A Pacific Telephone Belton PHSr&IR Pacific Telephone Betton Linda Pacific Telephone Welch Mary B Pacific Telephone 1975 Rowan Joe W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Rowan Joe W General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Stephan Paul The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1925 G D Brown Western Directory Co. 530 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1995 Jimenez Noemi Pacific Bell 1991 Spaid Steve Pacific Bell 1986 Spaid Steve Pacific Bell 1980 Mc Leod Curtis J Pacific Telephone 534 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Bothum Margaret General Telephone Co., of California 535 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1986 Bigelow Ben L Pacific Bell 1975 Bigelow Ben L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Bigelow Ben L General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Paulsell Sidney R The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Wood C A r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Wood C A r Southern California Telephone Co. 5417961-5 Page 59 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 540 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Alexander Edgar General Telephone Co., of California 544 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1995 Critchfleld Robert H III Pacific Bell 1980 Zimbelman Richard A Pacific Telephone 1975 Tucker D E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 545 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Trewett Helen M Pacific Telephone 1975 Trewett Helen M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Trewett John General Telephone Co., of California Norman C A General Telephone Co., of California 1925 J C Lindeman Western Directory Co. 555 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1925 C A Wood Western Directory Co. 1922 G C Bolm Western Directory Co. 600 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1966 Graffius Ralph D Pacific Telephone 601 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Lloyd Mc Kinley M General Telephone Co., of California Stuart Howard B General Telephone Co., of California 604 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1991 Hoke Monica D Pacific Bell 1986 Hoke Monica D Pacific Bell 1980 Hoke Monica D Pacific Telephone 1975 Hoke Monica D Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Hoke Monica D General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Capps Boyd R The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Cathey H W r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 60 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1946 Mc Shane A C r Southern California Telephone Co. 609 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1986 Culpepper M Pacific Bell Coffey Dwain E Pacific Bell 1980 Snow HJ Pacific Telephone 1975 Snow H J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Snow H J General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Snow H J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Snow H J r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1925 H J Snow Western Directory Co. 1922 H J Snow Western Directory Co. 610 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Olson Elven General Telephone Co., of California 611 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Davis Jack D General Telephone Co., of California 612 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1995 De Fazio Joseph Pacific Bell De Fazio Robert R Pacific Bell 1991 De Fazio Robert R Pacific Bell Defalio T lag B Pacific Bell De Fazio Joseph Pacific Bell 1955 Garrison Robt E The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1925 H R Swafford Western Directory Co. 1922 H R Swafford Western Directory Co. 615 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Barnes Lila B Pacific Telephone 1975 Barnes Lila B Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Barnes Lila B General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Res The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Fowler Jas G r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 61 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1946 Looney Chas V r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 Holliday Runyon Western Directory Co. 1922 W H Beck Western Directory Co. 616 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Bernhard Donald Jean Pacific Telephone 619 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Poole Maurice General Telephone Co., of California 620 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1986 Blackmore Edwin Pacific Bell 1975 Sears P Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Havens A L The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Havens A L r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Havens A L r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 A L Havens Western Directory Co. 1922 A L Havens Western Directory Co. 621 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Lopez Simon A Pacific Telephone Rodney Pacific Telephone Montgomery Dixie Pacific Telephone 1975 Lilienthal P Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Kuhn Harold Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bowers F E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Baker Artie Mrs General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Baker Artie Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Baker Artie Mrs r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Helliwell Ethel r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Baker Artie Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. Helliwell Ethel r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 P H Baker Western Directory Co. 1922 p H Baker Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 62 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 622 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Montamble Phil III Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Montamble Linda Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 623 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Pounds Kenneth General Telephone Co., of California tyourler Cecil General Telephone Co., of California 624 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1975 Olds Fred S Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Jewell Marvin L General Telephone Co., of California 1950 Draper Emma W r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1925 W C Hanger Western Directory Co. 625 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Abalos Inez Pacific Telephone Ambriz Adolfo Pacific Telephone 1970 Ambriz Amalla General Telephone Co., of California Ambriz Adolfo General Telephone Co., of California 626 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1980 Hirano Seiji Pacific Telephone 1975 Hawkins Michael W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Burnette Don General Telephone Co., of California Beaman Aileene D General Telephone Co., of California Beaman Floyd I General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Beaman Aileene D Pacific Telephone Beaman Floyd I Pacific Telephone 1955 Frye Ilva M The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Moring Martha The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Frye Ilva M r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Frye Ilva M r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 R B Pearson Western Directory Co. 1922 Chas Foster Western Directory Co. 5417961-5 Page 63 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 628 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1925 F H Rohde Western Directory Co. 1922 Mrs M E Collins Western Directory Co. S Orange St 629 S Orange St Year Uses Source 2014 LAUREL COLLECTION EDR Digital Archive IRIS & ME EDR Digital Archive 2010 LAUREL COLLECTION EDR Digital Archive IRIS & ME EDR Digital Archive 2005 LAUREL COLLECTION EDR Digital Archive S ORANGE ST 629 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1986 Lopez J Pacific Bell 1970 Higgins W W General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Intorf L H The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Intorf L H r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Intorf L H r Southern California Telephone Co. 1925 L H Jntorf Western Directory Co. 1922 L H Intorf Western Directory Co. 634 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1970 Owen Anna Mrs General Telephone Co., of California 635 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1995 Workman Geneva M Pacific Bell 1991 Workman Geneva M Pacific Bell 1980 Workman Geneva M Pacific Telephone 1975 Workman Geneva M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 636 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1995 Tollison Gary Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 64 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Van Dame DT Pacific Bell Tollison Gary Pacific Bell Meador Mike Pacific Bell 1986 Starr Jack Pacific Bell Meador Mike Pacific Bell 1980 Van Dame D T Pacific Telephone Van Dame Virgina Pacific Telephone 1975 Van Dame Donald T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Van Dame D T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Van Dame Donald T General Telephone Co., of California Van Dame D T General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Van Dame D T The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Bouck W E r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1925 L A Duncan Western Directory Co. 1922 I J Burd Western Directory Co. 637 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1995 Cress B L Pacific Bell 1991 Cress BL Pacific Bell Cress Bob Pacific Bell Cress Doris E Pacific Bell 1986 Cress B L Pacific Bell 1980 Cress BL Pacific Telephone 1975 Cress B L Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 640 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1925 Vacant Western Directory Co. 1922 Edmund Laederich Western Directory Co. 667 S ORANGE ST Year Uses Source 1991 Robertson Julian V Pacific Bell SE FAIRWAY DR 162 SE FAIRWAY DR Year Uses Source 1980 Castilian Park Apartments Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 65 Year Uses Source FINDINGS SE LA VETA AVE 192 SE LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Mc Glynn R J Investment Co Pacific Telephone W LA VETA AVE 100 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Davis Gary Vo DDS Pacific Bell Stroschein Guilbert TDDS Pacific Bell Micro MD Pacific Bell Ullyott L W Pacific Bell 1980 Hobbs Kenneth G Jr MD Pacific Telephone Bergstrom Richard A MD Pacific Telephone IKahn Bernard MD Pacific Telephone Kravif Eward Mb Pacific Telephone Oroiino Caesar F MD La Veta Orthopedic Medical GCroup Inc Pacific Telephone S UTHW E S T ME ICAL TRAN S CRIBE RS Pacific Telephone 1970 Smith Hobart H & Bartlett Wm L MDs General Telephone Co., of California Moran E Terrence MD Moran Rowen & Dorsey Inc Mo Ds General Telephone Co., of California 101 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Sandoval Irma Pacific Bell 1991 Dodson LT Pacific Bell Godson Kent Pacific Bell 105 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Allen Francis PHD a Pacific Bell 108 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Hathaway Philip E Pacific Bell 5417961-5 Page 66 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 109 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1970 COUNTY l General Telephone Co., of California Myers Marilyn G MD l General Telephone Co., of California 110 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Provincial Building Services Inc Pacific Bell 112 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Wallach Stuart Latty Pacific Bell 120 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Connors John Pacific Bell 1986 Greene Jr Clarence S MD Pacific Bell Luoan David S m d Pacific Bell 1980 Poucher Russet L MD Diabetes & Endocrinology Medical Group Inc Pacific Telephone Poucher Stacey Pacific Telephone 121 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 MACKIE G GARY MD U C I MEDICAL GROUP Pacific Bell 1980 Pke obert E MD Pacific Telephone 1966 Heim Edna Pacific Telephone 1955 Reiter Freda Mae The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Cartwright Shirley A r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Long G R Mrs r Southern California Telephone Co. 126 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Deters Paulette Sister Pacific Telephone Holy Family Convent Pacific Telephone 1975 Holy Family Convent Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Holy Family Convent General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Holy Family Convent Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 67 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 140 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Gastrodiagnostics Pacific Bell 190 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Aan MG Pacific Telephone a MK Pacific Telephone 1970 Wilburn S G General Telephone Co., of California 191 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Potheir JM Pacific Telephone 1970 Smith Chas E General Telephone Co., of California Semith Chas E V General Telephone Co., of California 200 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1986 Stewart David A Pacific Bell 1975 Society Devoted To The Sacred Heart Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Society Devoted to The Sacred Heart General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Helpers of the Holy Souls Pacific Telephone 1955 Holy Family Catholic Church The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 202 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Figueroa J B General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Figueroa J B Pacific Telephone 1955 Parsons Mary A The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Parsons Mary A r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Parsons Mary A r Southern California Telephone Co. 205 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Gilbert C C General Telephone Co., of California 1955 Patterson Winifred The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 206 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1955 Summers Matthew P The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Rodriguez Salvador r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 5417961-5 Page 68 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 214 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Bishop Henry G General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Bishop Henry G Pacific Telephone 1955 Moore E E The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Moore E E r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1946 Moore E E r Southern California Telephone Co. 215 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Harris Coye Pacific Telephone 1975 Croff C E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Tizzard L Douglas Pacific Telephone 1955 De Weerd Jane The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 217 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Desbrow Ed Pacific Bell 1966 Cinkis Albert Pacific Telephone CINI GUGLIELMO INC jwlry Pacific Telephone Packard Ray Pacific Telephone 222 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Tovar Sophie General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Tovar Sophie Pacific Telephone 223 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Ortiz Carmen Pacific Bell 1986 Eddy H M Pacific Bell 1980 Eddy H M Pacific Telephone 1966 Anderson F E Pacific Telephone 225 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Fraga Rafael Pacific Bell 1986 Mac Donald W D Pacific Bell 1970 Stinson Edith General Telephone Co., of California 5417961-5 Page 69 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 230 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1955 Dowdy Hubert The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1941 Adams Agnes r Southern California Telephone Co. 233 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Doyle Jas Edward General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Crimmings M L Pacific Telephone 235 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Mitchell C Neal Pacific Bell Mitchell CW& Lorne @Taft@ Pacific Bell 1986 Mitchell C Neal Pacific Bell 1980 Mitchell C Neal Pacific Telephone 0100 W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Conley John WMO Pacific Bell W W LA VETA AVE 121 W W LA VETA AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Gozzonigo Alan B MD Pacific Telephone 5417961-5 Page 70 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 574 S. Glassell Street 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 0100 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 0101 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 100 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 101 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 101 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 104 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 105 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 106 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 107 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 108 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 108 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 109 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 109 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 109 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 FAIRWAY LN 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 111 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 112 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 112 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 113 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 114 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 115 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 116 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 117 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 118 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 119 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 119 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 119 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 119 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 119 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 120 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 120 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 121 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 121 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 121 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 121 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 121 W W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 122 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 123 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 124 FAIRWAY DR E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 124 FAIRWAY PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 124 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 125 E LA PATHA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 125 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 126 E RIVER 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 126 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1921, 1920 126 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 126 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 126 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 126 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 126 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 127 E LA VETA DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 127 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 127 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 127 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 127 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 127 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 128 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 128 E LA VETA DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 128 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 129 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1921, 1920 130 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1921, 1920 130 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 130 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 130 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 131 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1921, 1920 131 RIVER 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 131 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 131 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 131 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 133 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 133 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 134 E LA VETA DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 134 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 137 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 137 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 137 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 139 E RIVER 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 139 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1921, 1920 139 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 139 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 139 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 140 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 140 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 141 E FAIRWAY DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 150 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 162 SE FAIRWAY DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 190 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 191 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 192 SE LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 195 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 200 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 200 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 201 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 202 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 202 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 205 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 205 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 205 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 205 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 206 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 206 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 206 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 206 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 207 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 209 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 209 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 210 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 210 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 210 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 212 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 212 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 213 1/2 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 213 E RIVER 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 213 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 213 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 213 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 213 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 214 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 214 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 215 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 215 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 217 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 218 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 221 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 222 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 222 E LA VETA DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 222 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 222 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 222 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 222 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 223 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 E RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1921, 1920 225 RIVER 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 RIVER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 RIVER AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 226 E LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 226 E LA VETA DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 226 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 230 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 230 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 230 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 233 E LA VETA DR 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 233 LA VETA AVE E 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 233 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 233 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 235 LA VETA AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 235 W LA VETA AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 474 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 475 OLIVE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 476 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 477 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 477 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 477 OLIVE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 477 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 480 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 480 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 481 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 482 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 482 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 482 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 482 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 483 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 483 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 484 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 484 OLIVE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 484 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 484 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 484 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1926, 1921, 1920 484 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 485 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 485 OLIVE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 485 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 485 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 485 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 485 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 485 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 486 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 486 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 488 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 488 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 488 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 488 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 488 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 488 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 490 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 492 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 492 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 493 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 493 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 493 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 493 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 493 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 493 S ORANGE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 493 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 495 OLIVE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 495 S OLIVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 495 S OLIVE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1926, 1921, 1920 503 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 503 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 503 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 504 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 505 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 508 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 509 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 509 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 510 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 510 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 514 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 515 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 515 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 515 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 518 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 518 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 520 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 521 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 S Glassell St 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 S ORANGE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 525 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 528 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 528 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 528 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 530 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 530 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 530 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 530 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 533 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 534 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 535 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1921, 1920 535 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 535 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 535 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 537 1/2 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 537 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 537 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 539 1/2 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 539 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 539 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 539 S Glassell St 2014, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 540 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 541 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 541 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 544 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 544 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 544 S ORANGE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 544 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 545 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 545 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 545 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 545 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 550 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 550 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 550 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 555 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 563 Fashion Park 2014, 2010, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 566 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 566 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 573 S Fashion Park St 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 576 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 576 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 585 S Fashion Park St 2014, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 600 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 601 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 601 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 603 S Glassell St 2014, 2010, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 604 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 604 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 604 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 604 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 605 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 607 Fashion Park 2014, 2010, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 607 S Fashion Park St 2014, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 609 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 609 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 609 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 609 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 610 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 611 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 611 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 612 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 612 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 612 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 615 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 615 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 615 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 615 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 615 S ORANGE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 615 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 616 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 617 Fashion Park 2014, 2010, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 617 S Fashion Park St 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 617 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 618 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 619 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 619 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 620 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 620 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 620 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 620 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 620 S ORANGE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 620 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 620 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 621 1/2 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 621 1/2 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 621 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 621 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 621 S ORANGE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 621 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 621 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 622 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 622 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 622 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 623 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 624 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 624 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 624 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 625 S Glassell St 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 625 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 626 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 626 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 626 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 626 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 627 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 627 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 628 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 628 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 629 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 629 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 629 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 629 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 629 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 629 S ORANGE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 629 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 629 S Orange St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 630 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 630 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 631 1/2 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 631 1/2 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 631 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 631 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 631 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 632 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 633 1/2 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 633 1/2 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 633 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 633 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 633 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 634 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 635 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 635 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 636 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 636 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 636 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 636 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 637 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 639 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1922, 1921, 1920 640 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 640 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 640 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1921, 1920 641 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 641 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 642 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 643 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 643 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 645 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 645 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 647 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 647 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 649 ORANGE ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 649 S ORANGE AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 655 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 655 GLASSELL ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 655 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 660 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 660 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 667 S ORANGE ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 684 S GLASSELL ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 684 S Glassell St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 Kisco Glassell 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Inquiry Number: 5417961.8 September 10, 2018 EDR Building Permit Report Target Property and Adjoining Properties 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION About This Report Executive Summary Findings Glossary Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR BUILDING PERMIT REPORT About This Report The EDR Building Permit Report provides a practical and efficient method to search building department records for indications of environmental conditions. Generated via a search of municipal building permit records gathered from more than 1,600 cities nationwide, this report will assist you in meeting the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. Building permit data can be used to identify current and/or former operations and structures/features of environmental concern. The data can provide information on a target property and adjoining properties such as the presence of underground storage tanks, pump islands, sumps, drywells, etc., as well as information regarding water, sewer, natural gas, electrical connection dates, and current/former septic tanks. ASTM and EPA Requirements ASTM E 1527-13 lists building department records as a "standard historical source," as detailed in § 8.3.4.7: “Building Department Records - The term building department records means those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on the property.” ASTM also states that “Uses in the area surrounding the property shall be identified in the report, but this task is required only to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the property itself.” EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) states: "§312.24: Reviews of historical sources of information. (a) Historical documents and records must be reviewed for the purposes of achieving the objectives and performance factors of §312.20(e) and (f). Historical documents and records may include, but are not limited to, aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, building department records, chain of title documents, and land use records.” Methodology EDR has developed the EDR Building Permit Report through our partnership with BuildFax, the nation’s largest repository of building department records. BuildFax collects, updates, and manages building department records from local municipal governments. The database now includes 30 million permits, on more than 10 million properties across 1,600 cities in the United States. The EDR Building Permit Report comprises local municipal building permit records, gathered directly from local jurisdictions, including both target property and adjoining properties. Years of coverage vary by municipality. Data reported includes (where available): date of permit, permit type, permit number, status, valuation, contractor company, contractor name, and description. Incoming permit data is checked at seven stages in a regimented quality control process, from initial data source interview, to data preparation, through final auditing. To ensure the building department is accurate, each of the seven quality control stages contains, on average, 15 additional quality checks, resulting in a process of approximately 105 quality control “touch points.” For more information about the EDR Building Permit Report, please contact your EDR Account Executive at (800) 352-0050. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SEARCH DOCUMENTATION A search of building department records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) on behalf of Leighton Consulting on Sep 10, 2018. TARGET PROPERTY 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 SEARCH METHODS EDR searches available lists for both the Target Property and Surrounding Properties. RESEARCH SUMMARY Building permits identified:YES The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Orange Source TPYear Adjoining 2018 City of Orange, Community Development X 2017 City of Orange, Community Development X 2016 City of Orange, Community Development X 2015 City of Orange, Community Development X 2014 City of Orange, Community Development X City of Orange, Community Development X 2013 City of Orange, Community Development X 2012 City of Orange, Community Development X 2011 City of Orange, Community Development X 2010 City of Orange, Community Development X 2009 City of Orange, Community Development X 2008 City of Orange, Community Development X 2007 City of Orange, Community Development X 2006 City of Orange, Community Development X 2005 City of Orange, Community Development X 2004 City of Orange, Community Development X 2003 City of Orange, Community Development X 2002 City of Orange, Community Development X 2001 City of Orange, Community Development X 2000 City of Orange, Community Development X 1999 City of Orange, Community Development X 1998 City of Orange, Community Development X 1997 City of Orange, Community Development X 1996 City of Orange, Community Development X 1995 City of Orange, Community Development X 1994 City of Orange, Community Development X 1993 City of Orange, Community Development X 1992 City of Orange, Community Development X 5417961-8 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SEARCH DOCUMENTATION Source TPYear Adjoining 1991 City of Orange, Community Development X 1990 City of Orange, Community Development X 1989 City of Orange, Community Development X City of Orange, Community Development X 1988 City of Orange, Community Development X BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Name:Orange Years:1988-2018 Source:City of Orange, Community Development, ORANGE, CA Phone:(714) 744-7200 Name:Fresno County Unincorporated Area Years:1969-2017 Source:Fresno County, Public Works and Planning, CLOVIS, CA Phone: (559) 600-4078 Name:Garden Grove Years:1960-2018 Source:City of Garden Grove, Community Development, GARDEN GROVE, CA Phone:(714) 741-5000 Name:Orange County Years:1990-2018 Source:Orange County, Planning and Development Services, Santa Ana, CA Phone:(714) 834-5238 Name:Redding Years:1987-2018 Source:City of Redding, Development Services, Building Division, Redding, CA Phone:530-225-4014 Name:Sacramento County Years:2013-2018 Source:Sacramento County, Planning and Community Development Department, FAIR OAKS, CA Phone:(916) 874-6141 Name:Huntington Beach Years:1996-2018 Source:Huntington Beach, Dept. of Building and Safety, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Phone:(714) 536-5241 5417961-8 Page 2 TARGET PROPERTY FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY DETAIL 574 S. Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 574 S GLASSELL ST Date:4/29/2014 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:UPGRADE (E) KITCHEN HOOD FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1403-239 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:YEN CHING RESTAURANT Date:11/15/1989 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8911-255 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MACK PLUMBING 5417961-8 Page 3 ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. E LA VETA AVE 134 E LA VETA AVE Date:5/31/2017 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:INSTALL NEW 2-TON A/C AND 6 DUCTS. Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1705-371 Status:APPROVED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SERVICE CHAMPIONS Date:2/29/2016 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:CHANGE GARBAGE DISPOSAL Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1602-322 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:J C PLUMBING INC 5417961-8 Page 4 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/7/1989 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8911-135 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 222 E LA VETA AVE Date:1/10/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0301-101 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SLATER DANIEL R, ORANGE REALTY 5417961-8 Page 5 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 224 E LA VETA AVE Date:5/19/2009 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:METER PEDESTAL Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0905-120 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:A T & T CALIFORNIA 226 E LA VETA AVE Date:12/20/2004 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0412-201 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRECKINBRIDGE, EDWARD 5417961-8 Page 6 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/25/1996 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9609-495 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PHIL KILLEEN Date:5/7/1992 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9205-134 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 233 E LA VETA AVE Date:3/6/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:ADD DOOR FROM GARAGE TO KITCHEN Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0103-036 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:VP TRUST/DAVID, MARK BALTES 5417961-8 Page 7 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/15/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9008-278 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:VERL F. BALTES Date:4/12/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8904-590 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:VERL F BALTES 5417961-8 Page 8 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS E LA VETA AVENUE 128 E LA VETA AVENUE Date:5/31/2017 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:INSTALL NEW 2-TON A/C AND 6 DUCTS. Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1705-359 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SERVICE CHAMPIONS Date:7/20/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9207-246 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MARGARET J DAVIS 5417961-8 Page 9 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS E RIVER 126 E RIVER Date:12/21/1999 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9912-188 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MARK UPTON 131 E RIVER Date:7/31/2008 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:EXPIRED 8/31/09 Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0807-246 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:FRASER C/O RICCI REALTY 5417961-8 Page 10 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS E RIVER AVE 119 E RIVER AVE Date:12/4/2002 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0212-036 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:AL RICCI Date:8/13/2001 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0108-114 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CAP ERNEST;FRANCES 5417961-8 Page 11 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:6/9/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9706-094 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ADAM THORIN 133 E RIVER AVE Date:3/14/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:- Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0503-165 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RICCI, ALAN 5417961-8 Page 12 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 137 E RIVER AVE Date:1/23/2014 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:RECONSTRUCT 365 SF FIRE DAMAGED AREAS /DEMO UNPERMITTED BDRM Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1311-193 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:R C BUILDERS Date:8/20/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:FIRE DAMAGE REPAIRS Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1308-048 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STREETER JOHN R A TR Date:7/11/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:DEMO FIRE DAMAGED UNITS Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1307-071 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STREETER JOHN R A TR 5417961-8 Page 13 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 205 E RIVER AVE Date:3/31/2015 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:REROOF HOUSE ONLY Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1503-320 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOYT ROOFS INC Date:1/26/1994 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9401-424 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 14 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 225 E RIVER AVE Date:7/21/1999 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:9907-200 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STEVENS Date:11/27/1991 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9111-450 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:AIR PLUS Date:11/27/1991 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9111-451 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:AIR PLUS 5417961-8 Page 15 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS E RIVER AVENUE 127 E RIVER AVENUE Date:7/31/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9507-439 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GALLA-RINI CONSTRUCTION N GLASSELL STREET 520 N GLASSELL STREET Date:9/21/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9509-333 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLMES ROOFING CO. II 5417961-8 Page 16 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/24/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8908-576 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BUNCH ELECTRIC S GLASSELL 565 S GLASSELL Date:5/31/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:0505-342 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH 5417961-8 Page 17 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 566 S GLASSELL Date:7/11/2018 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:TEMPORARY POWER FOR HOLY FAMILY FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1807-107 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:7/11/2018 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:TEMPORARY STAGE FOR HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class:MISCELLANEOUS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1807-106 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:7/3/2018 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:REPLACE (2) EXISTING SIDE EXIT DOORS W/NEW DOORS Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1807-035 Status:APPROVED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 18 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/27/2018 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:ANNUAL PALM SUNDAY PROCESSION Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1802-222 Status:UNDER REVIEW Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHERDRAL Date:11/7/2017 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:(2) TEMPORARY GENERATORS FOR EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:ELEC CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1711-080 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RONALD ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION INC Date:10/12/2017 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:TEMPORARY STAGE FOR HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class:MISCELLANEOUS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1710-108 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 19 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/11/2017 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:TEMP. POWER FOR FOOD BOOTHS FOR ANNUAL FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1710-100 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SOUTHERN PACIFIC ELECTRIC Date:9/12/2017 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1709-114 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY Date:3/16/2017 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:PALM SUNDAY PROCESSION- HOLY FAMILY Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1703-183 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 20 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/10/2016 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:RELOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECT. AROUND SEISMIC BRACING Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1610-085 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TIGHT LINES ELECTRIC INC Date:9/14/2016 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:TEMPORARY POWER FOR HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1609-153 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RONALD ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION INC Date:9/14/2016 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:TEMPORARY STAGE FOR HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class:MISCELLANEOUS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1609-169 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JESSICA MC CLURE 5417961-8 Page 21 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/7/2016 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1609-059 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:5/11/2016 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1605-116 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:5/3/2016 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:VOLUNTARY SEISMIC UPGRADE OF THE EXISTING CHURCH BLDG. Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1512-128 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MARCELO CAIRO, SE 5417961-8 Page 22 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/10/2016 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL PROMO Proposed Use: Permit Number:1603-129 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:9/24/2015 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:INSTALL GENERATORS FOR SPECIAL CHURCH EVENT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1509-324 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JESSICA MC CLURE Date:9/23/2015 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:TEMPORARY STAGE FOR HOLY FAMILY ANNUAL FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class:MISCELLANEOUS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1509-317 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JESSICA MC CLURE 5417961-8 Page 23 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/9/2015 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:TEMPORARY POWER FOR HOLY FAMILY FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1509-119 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JESSICA MC CLURE Date:9/3/2015 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1509-063 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:6/3/2015 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1506-056 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 24 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/4/2015 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1503-042 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:9/30/2014 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:REPLACE 1200 AMP METER SWITCHGEAR Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1409-363 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TIGHT LINES ELECTRIC INC Date:9/24/2014 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:TEMP STAGE/TENT + ELECT FOR HOLY FAMILY ANNUAL FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class:MISCELLANEOUS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1409-254 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JESSICA MC CLURE 5417961-8 Page 25 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/24/2014 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:GENERATOR FOR (12) RIDES FOR ANNUAL HOLY FAMILY FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1409-282 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RONALD ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION Date:7/24/2014 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1407-267 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:6/9/2014 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1406-087 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY HISPANIC MINISTRY 5417961-8 Page 26 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/26/2014 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1403-297 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:9/25/2013 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:GENERATOR FOR RIDES AT HOLY FAMILY EVENT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1309-247 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DAVIS ENTERPRISES Date:9/23/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:TEMP STAGE AND POWER Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1309-225 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 27 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/4/2013 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1309-002 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:5/30/2013 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1305-009 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:3/7/2013 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1303-002 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 28 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/24/2012 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:TEMP POWER FOR BOOTHS Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1209-189 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TOMMY MARTINEZ Date:9/20/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:TEMP STAGE Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1209-158 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:9/18/2012 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:GENERATOR Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1209-137 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JACKS ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 29 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/12/2012 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1207-002 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:5/30/2012 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1205-015 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:3/20/2012 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1203-012 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 30 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/1/2011 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1109-001 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:8/31/2011 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:+HOLY FAMILY FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1108-304 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:6/7/2011 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1106-002 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 31 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/4/2011 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1104-001 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:9/2/2010 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:HOLY FAMILY FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1009-020 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:2/25/2010 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:INSTALL MARBLE STATUE Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1002-165 Status:APPROVED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DIOCESE OF OF ORANGE 5417961-8 Page 32 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/24/2009 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:FIESTA Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0909-191 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:9/9/2008 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:2 HOUR INSPECTION Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0809-034 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:8/14/2007 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0708-126 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 33 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/14/2006 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0608-144 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:8/29/2005 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0508-353 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL Date:5/2/2005 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0505-007 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ACTION ELECTRIC CORP 5417961-8 Page 34 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/6/2000 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0006-284 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:P.G.S. CONSTRUCTION CORP Date:8/3/1999 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:CLASS-A GAF Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9908-024 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:Diocese of Orange Date:9/11/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9709-104 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRENNAN ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 35 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/11/1997 Permit Type:ELECTRIC Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9709-338 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRENNEN ELECTRIC Date:8/26/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9208-199 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HAMILTON ELECTRONIC SECURITY Date:5/28/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-396 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:FIRECON 5417961-8 Page 36 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/22/1992 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9204-377 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BOOZELL PLUMBING Date:2/21/1992 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9202-244 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:2/18/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9202-162 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRANCO ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 37 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/31/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9111-312 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JOHN B ABELL ;INC. CATHY Date:1/31/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9201-384 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF Date:11/19/1991 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9111-301 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 38 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:6/14/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9106-269 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LINNERT ROOFING Date:2/15/1991 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-195 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROTO ROOTER Date:7/19/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8907-307 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRANCO ELECTRIC ENT 5417961-8 Page 39 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/6/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:CHURCH Proposed Use: Permit Number:8906-540 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BLUROCK PARTNERSHIP Date:7/6/1989 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8907-064 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLLEY CONSTRUCTION Date:7/6/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:8907-071 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLLEY CONSTRUCTION 5417961-8 Page 40 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 649 S GLASSELL Date:3/27/2001 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0103-273 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TRU GREEN LANDSCAPE 683 S GLASSELL Date:4/19/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0104-153 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TOSCO 5417961-8 Page 41 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 701 S GLASSELL Date:1/13/2016 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:ADD 3 ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS, LIGHTS & SWITCHES FOR NEW STORAGE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1601-098 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:K D C CONSTRUCTION Date:2/5/2015 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:DEMOLISH "SNACK SHACK" STRUCTURE Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO /STRUCURE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1502-071 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MARK SAUER CONSTRUCTION INC Date:3/27/2014 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPAIR LUNCH SHELTER STRUCTURE. Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1310-280 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GRANGER CONST 5417961-8 Page 42 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/30/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:875 SQ FT PATIO COVER - HART PARK Permit Description: Work Class:PATIOCVR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1308-116 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HART PARK Date:8/29/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:APPLICATION EXPIRED AND PLANS DISCARDED Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1308-237 Status:EXPIRED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HART PARK Date:4/1/2010 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1004-013 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MAGNETIC ELECTRIC INC 5417961-8 Page 43 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/10/2009 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REROOF- HART PARK Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0911-076 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:J W ROOFING Date:1/20/2009 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0803-253 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HEISLER LANDSCAPE Date:6/2/2008 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0806-011 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:QUALCO FIRE PROTECTION INC. 5417961-8 Page 44 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/28/2007 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0706-104 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RENGEL + CO. ARCHITECTS Date:5/29/2007 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0705-297 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY Date:1/16/2007 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0612-221 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:FIREBALL ALARM 5417961-8 Page 45 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/3/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0603-118 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CITY OF ORANGE- HART PARK Date:5/22/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0604-053 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:QUALCO FIRE PROTECTION INC. Date:2/13/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0501-206 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BEAM CONSTRUCTION INC:A 5417961-8 Page 46 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/22/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0512-223 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GATES DEVELOPMENT CO Date:3/14/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0404-146 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL POOLS IN Date:11/10/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0405-277 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CITY OF ORANGE - 5417961-8 Page 47 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/27/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0404-145 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ADNAN FARHAT CONSTRUCTION Date:7/12/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0107-123 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CITY OF ORANGE-HART PARK Date:5/15/2001 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0105-163 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SPAR PLUMBING & HEATING 5417961-8 Page 48 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:5/15/2001 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0105-160 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SOUTHWEST ELECTRICAL CONTRACT Date:5/14/2001 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0105-142 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:G W AIR CONDITIONING INC Date:8/10/2000 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0004-170 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CITY OF ORANGE-HART PARK 5417961-8 Page 49 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:6/29/2000 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0006-420 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BUILDING ENERGY CONSULTANTS Date:3/13/2000 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0003-085 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CITY OF ORANGE / COMMUNITY SER Date:12/15/1994 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9411-107 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RCB ARCHITECT 5417961-8 Page 50 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/15/1994 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9412-203 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:UNITED BUILDERS Date:12/15/1994 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9412-191 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:UNITED BUILDERS Date:11/22/1994 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9411-356 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 51 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/22/1994 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9411-359 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:5/20/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9105-254 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THE ELECTRIC CONNECTION Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-305 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 5417961-8 Page 52 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/26/1990 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9004-659 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ORANGE JAY CEES Date:2/6/1990 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:TENT Proposed Use: Permit Number:9002-077 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THE ELECTRIC CONNECTION Date:5/4/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:8905-153 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:B&B AMUSEMENTS INC 5417961-8 Page 53 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/31/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:8901-699 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ELECTRIC CONNECTION Date:11/30/1988 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:STAGE Proposed Use: Permit Number:8811-892 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRUGMAN MGMT & DEVELOPMENT Date:11/30/1988 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:STAGE Proposed Use: Permit Number:8811-897 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRUGMAN MGMT & DEVELOPMENT 5417961-8 Page 54 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S GLASSELL 1-16 660 S GLASSELL 1-16 Date:2/15/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:BATHROOM REMODEL Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1802-122 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HI-TECH BUILDERS INC Date:10/3/2016 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:ADMIN. PERMIT TO FINALIZE EXPIRED PERMIT 0512-089 Permit Description: Work Class:ADMINISTRATIVE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1610-010 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:OWNER 5417961-8 Page 55 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:6/3/2013 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:REPIPING Permit Description: Work Class:PLUB CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1306-004 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:6/20/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPLACE 4 WINDOWS AND 1 PATIO DOOR Permit Description: Work Class:WINDOWS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1206-165 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DELAY JOHN E & DENA J Date:1/9/2012 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1201-065 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS 5417961-8 Page 56 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/9/2012 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1201-067 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:1/9/2012 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1201-068 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:6/7/2011 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:WATERLINE REPLACEMENT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1106-060 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS H.O. ASSOC 5417961-8 Page 57 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/7/2011 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1102-041 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:8/18/2009 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE UNITS 33-40 Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0908-140 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA Date:8/18/2009 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE UNITS 81-92 Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0908-141 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA 5417961-8 Page 58 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/15/2008 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:REPLACE WALL FURNACE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0812-126 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TONY TRABUCCO Date:8/14/2008 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0808-095 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALL PRO COPPER REPIPE Date:9/14/2007 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPAIR WATER DAMAGE AND DRY ROT Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0709-096 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KAYE BRYAN E 5417961-8 Page 59 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/9/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0512-089 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RONALD LUBIN Date:12/15/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0312-173 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:COLONIAL GROUP Date:11/25/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0311-251 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THOMAS CONSTRUCTION 5417961-8 Page 60 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/25/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0304-331 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA Date:9/25/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0312-172 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA Date:9/15/2003 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0309-163 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TEAM PROPERTY MGMT 5417961-8 Page 61 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/4/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0101-050 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ACTEC EMGINEERING Date:4/15/1999 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:9904-186 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS/TCB PROPERTY MGMT Date:10/23/1998 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9810-419 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BEEBE ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 62 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/30/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9709-795 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GANNON DESIGN Date:11/20/1995 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9511-527 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NOCK PLUMBING Date:10/4/1995 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9510-089 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NOCK PLUMBING 5417961-8 Page 63 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/7/1995 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9508-132 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:D.P. PLUMBING Date:4/3/1995 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9504-024 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:R.L. ELECTRIC Date:3/28/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9503-375 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TOTAL ACCESS DOOR SYSTEMS 5417961-8 Page 64 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-388 Status:VOID Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-409 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-406 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING 5417961-8 Page 65 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-394 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-391 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-393 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 66 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-398 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-399 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-400 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 67 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-404 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-405 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-407 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. 5417961-8 Page 68 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-411 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-384 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-381 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 69 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-396 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-408 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-410 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC 5417961-8 Page 70 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-412 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-413 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-414 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC 5417961-8 Page 71 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-415 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-416 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-419 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC 5417961-8 Page 72 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-421 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-422 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-424 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 73 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/28/1990 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:CONDOS Proposed Use: Permit Number:9003-701 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEASURE ENTERPRISES Date:3/13/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:CONDOS Proposed Use: Permit Number:9003-140 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KARL FRIESS CONSTRUCTION Date:9/26/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8909-538 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MACHELLE HAMILTON 5417961-8 Page 74 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/15/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8908-371 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MACHELLE HAMILTON Date:6/28/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8906-781 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HELAINE GAWRONSKI Date:6/26/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8906-723 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HELAINE GAWRONSKI 5417961-8 Page 75 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S GLASSELL ST 480 S GLASSELL ST Date:11/24/2014 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:REPLACE WATER LINE FROM METER TO HOUSE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1411-241 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROTO-ROOTER SERV & PLUMBING CO Date:10/12/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:9810-171 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NENDEL LIBERTAD 5417961-8 Page 76 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/27/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9310-346 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MR. ROOFER Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-335 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 481 S GLASSELL ST Date:1/20/2009 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:ELECRTRICAL FOR PERMIT 0811-125 Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0901-149 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:O.R. REFRIGERATION 5417961-8 Page 77 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/13/2009 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0811-125 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:J.E. ARMSTRONG ARCHITECT Date:7/8/2002 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:EXPIRED 10/01/04 Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0207-051 Status:EXPIRED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:K & B MARKET 503 S GLASSELL ST Date:5/9/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:SIGN Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1305-072 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JAQUITH LAURA 5417961-8 Page 78 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 525 S GLASSELL ST Date:3/30/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:FIRE DAMAGE REPAIRS, INTERIOR REMODEL Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1803-304 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JWB CONSTRUCTION Date:3/7/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:NON-STRUCT. INTERIOR DEMO OF FIRE DAMAGED AREAS Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO /MISCELLANEOUS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1803-078 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JWB CONSTRUCTION Date:2/21/2017 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:RESTORE POWER TO 100 AMP. MAIN PANEL, INSTALL 2 OUTLETS Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1702-233 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROWE ELECTRIC INC 5417961-8 Page 79 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 530 S GLASSELL ST Date:5/1/2018 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT-BODY OF CHRIST PROCESSION Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1805-002 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:4/13/2017 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:(2) 9' 4" & (22) 7' PILASTERS W/660 LF OF 6' STEEL FENCING Permit Description: Work Class:WALL /FENCE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1704-186 Status:APPROVED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MIKE HENNESSEY Date:3/6/2015 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1503-066 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL SCHOOL 5417961-8 Page 80 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/10/2012 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1204-009 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL Date:1/30/2012 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:REPLACE EXISTING GAS LINE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1201-222 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DIOCESE OF ORANGE ED Date:8/3/2011 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:FIRE LIFE SAFETY UPGRADE Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1106-191 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL SCHOOL 5417961-8 Page 81 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/7/2010 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:INSTALL 2 NEW SMOKE DETECTORS AND 1 HEAT DETECTOR Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1006-191 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WENDT'S ENTERPRISES Date:2/25/2010 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:GENERATOR FOR SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1002-164 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GARY ECCLESTON Date:2/23/2010 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:TEMPORARY TENT Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1002-154 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL 5417961-8 Page 82 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/12/2009 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:FIRE ALARM SYSTEM Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0907-231 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WENDT'S ENTERPRISES Date:6/5/2000 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:9905-141 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MICHAEL KRAKOWER Date:8/21/1995 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9508-431 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:FRANKLIN & SON 5417961-8 Page 83 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/1/1995 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9508-038 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WILLIAMS & MAHER INC Date:7/13/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9507-218 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:AHERN ARCHITECTS Date:6/20/1994 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9406-290 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 84 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/9/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9207-120 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WEST COAST ELECTRIC Date:7/9/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9207-123 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WEST COAST ELECTRIC Date:6/16/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9202-307 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEONARD SOUTH & SON INC 5417961-8 Page 85 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:6/16/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9202-314 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEONARD SOUTH & SON INC Date:6/14/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9106-271 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LINNERT ROOFING Date:3/13/1989 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SCHOOL Proposed Use: Permit Number:8903-276 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALLIED PLBG/HTG INC 5417961-8 Page 86 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 533 S GLASSELL ST Date:6/3/2010 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:WATER HEATER Permit Description: Work Class:PLUB CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1006-040 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KARASEK DAISY T Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-345 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 5417961-8 Page 87 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 620 S GLASSELL ST Date:8/2/2017 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:FIRE ALARM SYSTEM EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1707-188 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CAL BUILDING SYSTEMS Date:12/19/2016 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:FIRE SPRINKLERS FOR T.I. Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1612-197 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:APEX FIRE SYSTEMS INC Date:11/1/2016 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:651 sq ft TENANT IMPROVEMENT Permit Description: Work Class:TENANT IMPROVEMENT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1605-367 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SHELTER LLP 5417961-8 Page 88 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/2/2015 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:INSTALL OUTDOOR FIREPLACE WITH 22' LF X 3' HIGH LOW WALL Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1506-330 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MICHAEL SAVAGE Date:1/28/2015 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:DOOR HOLDERS Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1501-149 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CAL BUILDING SYSTEMS Date:12/10/2014 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:REPLACE ELECTRICAL INVERTER USED FOR EMERGENCY LIGHTING Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1412-103 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY I 5417961-8 Page 89 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/16/2011 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:MONUMENT SIGN Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1112-120 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HBA INCORPORATED Date:6/9/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0506-100 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK PLAZA ASSISTED LIVING Date:4/25/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:0504-228 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KISCO (PARK PLAZA) 5417961-8 Page 90 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/15/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0308-214 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK PLAZA Date:8/11/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0308-125 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK PLAZA Date:8/27/1998 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9808-366 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK PLAZA 5417961-8 Page 91 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/7/1996 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9610-073 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:I.L.G. ELECTRIC Date:9/9/1996 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9602-335 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:IRWIN ARCHITECTURAL GROUP 630 S GLASSELL ST Date:3/15/2016 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:4,000 SQ FT REROOF Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1603-160 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SUPERIOR ROOFING SYSTEMS 5417961-8 Page 92 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/17/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0608-187 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HEIDI WINKLER Date:6/12/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9506-194 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DR HEIDI WINKLER Date:8/10/1994 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9407-344 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ORANGE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION 5417961-8 Page 93 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/28/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9210-360 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BLIGH PACIFIC Date:1/16/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9201-195 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BLIGH PACIFIC 633 S GLASSELL ST Date:11/23/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9811-389 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HENRY PALOMINO 5417961-8 Page 94 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-311 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS Date:1/2/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9101-010 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HENRY M. PALOMINO 641 S GLASSELL ST Date:10/2/2017 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:REPAIR WATER LINE FROM METER TO BLDG. & INSTALL SWER CLEAN O Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1710-008 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROTO ROOTER SERVICE AND PLUMBING CO. 5417961-8 Page 95 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/17/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0303-184 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MIKE BEECHER Date:3/17/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0303-182 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MIKE BEECHER Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-306 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 5417961-8 Page 96 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 655 S GLASSELL ST Date:6/10/2010 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPLACE 15 WINDOWS (140 SQ FT) AND 6 DOORS Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:1006-091 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ELI HOME INC Date:1/31/2007 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0701-261 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TECH ONE Date:9/27/2004 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0409-216 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LOGAN MECHANICAL INC 5417961-8 Page 97 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/2/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:DEMO POOL Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO POOL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0104-003 Status:EXPIRED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ELI HOME Date:7/10/2000 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0007-058 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ELI HOME INC. 660 S GLASSELL ST Date:2/15/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:BATHROOM REMODEL Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1802-122 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HI-TECH BUILDERS INC 5417961-8 Page 98 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/3/2016 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:ADMIN. PERMIT TO FINALIZE EXPIRED PERMIT 0512-089 Permit Description: Work Class:ADMINISTRATIVE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1610-010 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:OWNER Date:6/3/2013 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:REPIPING Permit Description: Work Class:PLUB CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1306-004 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:6/20/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPLACE 4 WINDOWS AND 1 PATIO DOOR Permit Description: Work Class:WINDOWS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1206-165 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DELAY JOHN E & DENA J 5417961-8 Page 99 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/9/2012 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1201-065 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:1/9/2012 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1201-067 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:1/9/2012 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1201-068 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS 5417961-8 Page 100 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:6/7/2011 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:WATERLINE REPLACEMENT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1106-060 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS H.O. ASSOC Date:2/7/2011 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER RE-PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1102-041 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS Date:8/18/2009 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE UNITS 33-40 Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0908-140 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA 5417961-8 Page 101 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/18/2009 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE UNITS 81-92 Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0908-141 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA Date:12/15/2008 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:REPLACE WALL FURNACE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0812-126 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TONY TRABUCCO Date:8/14/2008 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0808-095 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALL PRO COPPER REPIPE 5417961-8 Page 102 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/14/2007 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPAIR WATER DAMAGE AND DRY ROT Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0709-096 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KAYE BRYAN E Date:12/9/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0512-089 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RONALD LUBIN Date:12/15/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0312-173 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:COLONIAL GROUP 5417961-8 Page 103 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/25/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0311-251 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THOMAS CONSTRUCTION Date:9/25/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0304-331 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA Date:9/25/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0312-172 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS HOA 5417961-8 Page 104 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/15/2003 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0309-163 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TEAM PROPERTY MGMT Date:1/4/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0101-050 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ACTEC EMGINEERING Date:4/15/1999 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:9904-186 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PARK ORLEANS/TCB PROPERTY MGMT 5417961-8 Page 105 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/23/1998 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9810-419 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BEEBE ELECTRIC Date:9/30/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9709-795 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GANNON DESIGN Date:11/20/1995 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9511-527 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NOCK PLUMBING 5417961-8 Page 106 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/4/1995 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9510-089 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NOCK PLUMBING Date:8/7/1995 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9508-132 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:D.P. PLUMBING Date:4/3/1995 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9504-024 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:R.L. ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 107 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/28/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9503-375 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TOTAL ACCESS DOOR SYSTEMS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-388 Status:VOID Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-409 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 108 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-406 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-394 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-391 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 109 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-393 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-398 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-399 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. 5417961-8 Page 110 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-400 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-404 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-405 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 111 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-407 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INCC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-411 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-384 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 112 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-381 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-396 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-408 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 113 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-410 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-412 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-413 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 114 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-414 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-415 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-416 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 115 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-419 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-421 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING INC Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-422 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. 5417961-8 Page 116 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/21/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-424 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CANYON ROOFING, INC. Date:3/28/1990 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:CONDOS Proposed Use: Permit Number:9003-701 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEASURE ENTERPRISES Date:3/13/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:CONDOS Proposed Use: Permit Number:9003-140 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KARL FRIESS CONSTRUCTION 5417961-8 Page 117 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/26/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8909-538 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MACHELLE HAMILTON Date:8/15/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8908-371 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MACHELLE HAMILTON Date:6/28/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8906-781 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HELAINE GAWRONSKI 5417961-8 Page 118 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:6/26/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8906-723 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HELAINE GAWRONSKI 684 S GLASSELL ST Date:4/16/2018 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:ILLUMINATED SIGNS Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:1804-141 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DONCO & SONS INC Date:2/2/2018 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:TEMP POWER Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1802-018 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WESTERN STATES CONSTRUCTION INC 5417961-8 Page 119 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/31/2018 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:RELOCATE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK /VENT LINES, NEW DISP. Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:1801-290 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CALIFORNIA MAINTENANCE & ENV. Date:1/3/2017 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:NEW GAS STATION STORE Permit Description: Work Class:NEW BLDG. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1701-024 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WESTERN STATES CONSTRUCTION INC Date:10/28/2008 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:HEALY TANK Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0809-161 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JEMS ORANGE INC 5417961-8 Page 120 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/14/2008 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:UNDERGROUND TANK Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0801-156 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HARVEY Date:12/20/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:0612-230 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JAVIER VICENCIO Date:1/10/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0412-233 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CONOCO PHILLIPS # 255299 5417961-8 Page 121 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/17/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0410-060 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:76 SERVICE STATION # 255299 Date:5/20/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0305-180 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CONOCO PHILLIPS Date:11/26/2002 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0211-090 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RIZWAN 5417961-8 Page 122 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:5/7/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0104-198 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:TOSCO Date:10/13/1993 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9310-141 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SANDERS SERVICES Date:9/15/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9308-203 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC 5417961-8 Page 123 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/19/1993 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9307-279 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PETCON INC Date:7/12/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9302-285 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PETCON INC Date:7/12/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9307-143 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PETCON INC 5417961-8 Page 124 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:5/4/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9205-023 Status:PC OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SUBURBAN PR OPANE Date:3/14/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:GAS STATION Proposed Use: Permit Number:9002-171 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CARSE COMPANY Date:5/19/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:8903-643 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JOE RHOADES MAINTENANCE 5417961-8 Page 125 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S GLASSELL STREET 488 S GLASSELL STREET Date:11/15/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9311-162 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRENT OWENS ROOFING Date:10/18/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9310-203 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CITY OF ORANGE 5417961-8 Page 126 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 537 S GLASSELL STREET Date:7/20/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:REROOF MULTI-FAMILY BLDG. & ATTACHED CARPORT Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1807-202 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ADAM'S ROOFING INC Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-334 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 5417961-8 Page 127 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 556 S GLASSELL STREET Date:6/22/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9206-395 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEISURE AIRE INC Date:5/7/1990 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9005-177 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRANCO ELECTRIC Date:4/9/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMML Proposed Use: Permit Number:9003-827 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLLEY CONSTRUCTION 5417961-8 Page 128 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/9/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMML Proposed Use: Permit Number:9003-831 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLLEY CONSTRUCTION Date:3/30/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8910-403 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BARTLETT ASSOC ARCH Date:3/30/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8910-406 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORAN 5417961-8 Page 129 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 615 S GLASSELL STREET Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-342 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 629 S GLASSELL STREET Date:2/27/1995 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9502-335 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WESTERN ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 130 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/23/1995 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9502-318 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:M.D. BUILDERS Date:2/13/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9411-248 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROBERT COULSON Date:2/13/1995 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9502-179 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 131 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/13/1995 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9502-180 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:1/26/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9501-375 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LARRY HAUPERT Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-326 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 5417961-8 Page 132 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/22/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8909-492 Status:PC OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROBERT MENSICK 631 S GLASSELL STREET Date:1/26/1995 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9501-368 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LARRY HAUPERT Date:2/25/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9102-337 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 5417961-8 Page 133 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/22/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8909-491 Status:CANCEL Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROBERT MENSICK S GRAND 610 S GRAND Date:5/12/1998 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9805-132 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DANNA ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 134 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/23/1998 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9804-236 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HESS CONSTRUCTION Date:4/23/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9804-235 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HESS CONSTRUCTION 614 S GRAND Date:5/12/1998 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9805-134 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DANNA ELECTRIC 5417961-8 Page 135 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S GRAND ST 504 S GRAND ST Date:11/16/2000 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0010-298 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:M3 DESIGN Date:11/22/1988 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8811-654 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 136 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 520 S GRAND ST Date:2/18/2016 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:REROOF HOUSE ONLY Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1602-234 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GUARDIAN ROOFS ENERGY SOLUTIONS Date:1/7/2016 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:HVAC CHANGE OUT & DUCTS Permit Description: Work Class:MECH CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1601-077 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALPS AIR CONDITIONING & HEATING 5417961-8 Page 137 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 528 S GRAND ST Date:3/21/2005 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0503-220 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRAD BEYER Date:11/12/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REROOF Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9711-147 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LOIS BEYER 5417961-8 Page 138 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 552 S GRAND ST Date:9/20/2017 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:SEWER REPAIRS Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1709-213 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RESCUE ROOTER Date:10/22/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0110-255 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DORIS HARRINGTON Date:10/7/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-123 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ARMSTRONG ROOFING 5417961-8 Page 139 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/6/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9103-041 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LINS ELECTRIC 604 S GRAND ST Date:11/24/2010 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:CHANGEOUT HEATER AND A/C Permit Description: Work Class:MECH CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1011-200 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BOWIE MARK T & SARA P Date:12/5/1991 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9112-071 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 140 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/5/1991 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9112-073 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:7/29/1991 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9107-430 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:OLIVIAS MECHANICAL CORP Date:7/17/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9106-296 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:M/M BOB GOEHLE 5417961-8 Page 141 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/5/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8907-024 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CORNERSTONE ROOFING CO Date:6/20/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SFD Proposed Use: Permit Number:8906-570 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:IRVINE WEST HEATING AIR Date:6/20/1989 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SFD Proposed Use: Permit Number:8906-579 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:IRVINE WEST HEATING AIR 5417961-8 Page 142 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 640 S GRAND ST Date:10/16/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0110-189 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BUD AUST 644 S GRAND ST Date:4/7/2015 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:NEW CHIMNEY Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1502-085 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RED HOT ENTERPRISES 5417961-8 Page 143 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/13/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:SHOWER REPLACEMENT Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1209-095 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RODRIGUEZ PERRY T & KATHLEEN A Date:3/20/2006 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0603-151 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:COAST WATER & POWER Date:1/17/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0601-170 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KATHLEEN RODRIGUEZ 5417961-8 Page 144 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/7/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0503-077 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KATHY & PERRY RODRIQUEZ Date:7/21/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0407-239 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GAUSTAD FLORENCE P 5417961-8 Page 145 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S GRAND STREET 512 S GRAND STREET Date:12/27/1988 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8812-470 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:VILLA VISTA DEV CORP 536 S GRAND STREET Date:9/16/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9709-416 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SHOWCASE BUILDERS INC 5417961-8 Page 146 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 636 S GRAND STREET Date:5/15/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9205-282 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:5/15/1992 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9205-284 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:5/15/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9205-279 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 147 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:5/15/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9205-280 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RICHARD W ZEILER Date:4/30/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9204-528 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:4/30/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9204-532 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 148 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/30/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8910-683 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RICHARD W. ZEILER Date:10/11/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8910-336 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 646 S GRAND STREET Date:4/29/1996 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ARES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9604-444 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CUSTOM RECOVER ROOFING 5417961-8 Page 149 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/24/1989 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8904-933 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: S OLIVE 495 S OLIVE Date:12/15/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9712-188 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:AUSTIN COURT 5417961-8 Page 150 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/1/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9311-006 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LINNERT ROOFING S OLIVE ST 475 S OLIVE ST Date:3/17/2011 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:DEMO ILLEGAL ADDITION . Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1103-142 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALAMAN GRISELDA 5417961-8 Page 151 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/8/2010 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:WATER HEATER CHAGE OUT Permit Description: Work Class:PLUB CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1012-061 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALAMAN GRISELDA Date:10/10/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9710-181 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GRISELDA M. ALAMAN Date:10/5/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9310-036 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CASEY JURADO 5417961-8 Page 152 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 485 S OLIVE ST Date:9/12/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPLACE EXTERIOR WOOD STAIRCASE Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1309-113 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ADRAY'S-VP HANDYMAN CONSTRUCTI Date:8/29/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REPLACE EXTERIOR STAIRS Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1308-236 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ADRAY'S-VP HANDYMAN CONSTRUCTI Date:4/16/2012 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:2 NEW FURNACES Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1204-107 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DEMALLEN DELIA 5417961-8 Page 153 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/16/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REROOF Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1204-104 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DEMALLEN DELIA Date:10/10/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9710-180 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DELIA GARCIA DEMALLEN 5417961-8 Page 154 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S OLIVE STREET 477 S OLIVE STREET Date:10/10/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9710-182 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GRISELDA M. ALAMAN S ORANGE 492 S ORANGE Date:5/9/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:CONVERT 476 SF GARAGE TO ACCESSORY UNIT, ADD 516 SF GARAGE Permit Description: Work Class:NEW SINGLE FAMILY Proposed Use: Permit Number:1805-074 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BRIAN SCOTT 5417961-8 Page 155 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/7/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:950 SF REROOF HOUSE ONLY Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1802-054 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:OWNER/BUILDER Date:11/7/1997 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9711-088 Status:expired Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MED-TOX, INC. Date:9/10/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9709-311 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JOHN DALY 5417961-8 Page 156 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 545 S ORANGE Date:11/19/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:9811-362 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JOHN THAWLEY Date:1/6/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9801-027 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JOHN THAWLEY 5417961-8 Page 157 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 609 S ORANGE Date:1/25/1999 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9901-225 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MARK BROWN S ORANGE AVENUE 535 S ORANGE AVENUE Date:10/29/2013 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:MINOR BATHROOM REMODEL Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1310-251 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HUDNALL CARRIE MARIE 5417961-8 Page 158 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/5/2006 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE, WATER HEATER CHANGE OUT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0612-019 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NORMAN CARTER Date:4/30/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9204-524 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PRO HEATING & AIR Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-076 Status:CANCEL Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALAN R. CHAMBERS 5417961-8 Page 159 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9107-212 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DAVID & LAUREL WOLFE Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-066 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THE CHAMBERS COMPANY Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-060 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THE CHAMBERS COMPANY 5417961-8 Page 160 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S ORANGE ST 476 S ORANGE ST Date:8/23/1999 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9908-223 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ARMIDA MAGARRO Date:12/23/1996 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9612-294 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PRO HEATING & AIR 5417961-8 Page 161 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:12/23/1996 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9612-302 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PRO HEATING & AIR Date:10/11/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8908-525 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEO FITZSIMON Date:10/11/1989 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SFR Proposed Use: Permit Number:8910-274 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 162 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/11/1989 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SFR Proposed Use: Permit Number:8910-283 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:10/11/1989 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SFR Proposed Use: Permit Number:8910-286 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:9/7/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8909-143 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEO FITZSIMON 5417961-8 Page 163 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 478 S ORANGE ST Date:4/16/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:RECONSTRUCT EXTERIOR STAIRS Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1304-112 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MAGARRO ARMIDA G 482 S ORANGE ST Date:8/13/2015 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:REROOF Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1508-160 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LUKE ROOFING INC 5417961-8 Page 164 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 493 S ORANGE ST Date:11/21/2016 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM Permit Description: Work Class:PHOTOVOLTAIC /SOLAR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1611-255 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SOLARCITY CORPORATION Date:9/9/2015 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:FOUNDATION BOLTING RETROFIT. Permit Description: Work Class:ALTERATION /REPAIR Proposed Use: Permit Number:1509-106 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:N R CONSTRUCTION INC Date:9/5/2012 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:MECHANICAL CHANGEOUT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1209-015 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:OVESON JAMES C & SHANNON N 5417961-8 Page 165 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/22/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0611-209 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JAMES OVESON Date:3/7/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0303-091 Status:EXPIRED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:OVESON JAMES C & SHANNON N Date:5/7/1999 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:9905-085 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LYNDA W. WHITMIRE 5417961-8 Page 166 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/9/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:9802-042 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LYNDA W. WHITMIRE 510 S ORANGE ST Date:8/9/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:NEW HVAC SYSTEM. UPGRADE PANEL. Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1308-064 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALL CITY SERVICE COMPANY Date:7/11/2013 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:280 S.F. OPEN LATICE PATIO COVER Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1307-070 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:COLE PEGGY L 5417961-8 Page 167 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/22/1999 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:9903-183 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PEGGY COLE 515 S ORANGE ST Date:10/10/2017 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:REPLACE SEWER PIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1710-089 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WISE CHOICE PLUMBING & ROOTER INC Date:12/22/2011 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:MECHANICAL CHANGEOUT Permit Description: Work Class:MECH CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1112-179 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:EBERHARDT WARREN P JR 5417961-8 Page 168 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/27/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9708-406 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WEATHERLINE ROOFING INC Date:10/24/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9110-487 Status:CANCEL Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RAINPROOF ROOFING Date:8/6/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:GARAGE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9107-159 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:WARREN PEBERHARDT 5417961-8 Page 169 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 518 S ORANGE ST Date:9/21/2016 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:ELECTRICAL MAIN PANEL UPGRADE Permit Description: Work Class:ELEC CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1609-202 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GANDZJUK ELECTRIC INCORPORATED Date:9/21/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9809-274 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:H.W. AARON 5417961-8 Page 170 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 525 S ORANGE ST Date:11/21/2017 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:REROOF FRONT HOUSE ONLY Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1711-237 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GALLA-RINI CONSTRUCTION Date:4/25/2008 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:ON THE HOUSE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0804-217 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BEARD ROBERT MARK & THERESA MA Date:5/10/1994 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9402-207 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROBERT M BEARD 5417961-8 Page 171 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:5/10/1994 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9405-200 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:5/10/1994 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9405-202 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:5/10/1994 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9405-204 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 172 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/24/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:GAR Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-320 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 535 S ORANGE ST Date:10/29/2013 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:MINOR BATHROOM REMODEL Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1310-251 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HUDNALL CARRIE MARIE Date:12/5/2006 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE, WATER HEATER CHANGE OUT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0612-019 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NORMAN CARTER 5417961-8 Page 173 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/30/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9204-524 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PRO HEATING & AIR Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-076 Status:CANCEL Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ALAN R. CHAMBERS Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9107-212 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DAVID & LAUREL WOLFE 5417961-8 Page 174 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-066 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THE CHAMBERS COMPANY Date:3/5/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9203-060 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:THE CHAMBERS COMPANY 604 S ORANGE ST Date:12/1/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REROOF Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:9712-022 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOKE 5417961-8 Page 175 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/14/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9208-179 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 615 S ORANGE ST Date:6/28/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0406-369 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ARMSTRONG EDWARD L Date:3/14/2001 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0103-140 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:BARNES ARTHUR;ARMSTRONG EDWARD 5417961-8 Page 176 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 622 S ORANGE ST Date:10/24/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REROOF REAR HOUSE AND CARPORT Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1210-208 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GRAND PACIFIC 629 S ORANGE ST Date:10/31/2013 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL UPGRADE Permit Description: Work Class:ELEC CHANGE-OUT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1310-279 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RORY ELECTRIC INC 5417961-8 Page 177 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/26/2011 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REROOF Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1109-215 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LOPEZ LAREE E Date:10/5/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9210-035 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ARMSTRONG ROOFING 636 S ORANGE ST Date:5/21/2015 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:RESIDENTIAL REMODEL Permit Description: Work Class:ADDITION Proposed Use: Permit Number:1504-333 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DONNA 5417961-8 Page 178 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 649 S ORANGE ST Date:7/20/2009 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:BATHROOM REMODEL Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER Proposed Use: Permit Number:0907-113 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ONE WEEK BATH Date:4/14/2005 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0504-136 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STASTNY MICHAEL J & LORRIE J Date:4/1/2005 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0504-001 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STASTNY MICHAEL J & LORRIE J 5417961-8 Page 179 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/24/2005 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0503-286 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STASTNY MICHAEL J & LORRIE J Date:3/7/2005 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0503-083 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MICHAEL STASTNY Date:10/29/2001 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0110-298 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MIKE STASTNY 5417961-8 Page 180 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:4/21/1994 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9404-225 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC AIR COMFORT Date:4/21/1994 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9404-226 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PACIFIC AIR COMFORT Date:5/17/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8905-314 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STASTNY 5417961-8 Page 181 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS S ORANGE STREET 479 S ORANGE STREET Date:7/20/1994 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9406-489 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RICH ROBERTSON Date:7/20/1994 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9407-278 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 182 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/20/1994 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9407-279 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:7/20/1994 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9407-285 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 485 S ORANGE STREET Date:11/2/1993 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9311-039 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 183 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:11/2/1993 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9311-041 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:10/21/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9310-267 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STEVEN G. MCHARRIS Date:9/22/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9309-322 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION 5417961-8 Page 184 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/29/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9303-379 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:STEVEN G. MCHARRIS 528 S ORANGE STREET Date:5/8/2018 Permit Type:RESIDENTIAL Description:3,000 SF REROOF DUPLEX & ATTACHED GARAGE Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:1805-061 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:PREMIER ROOFING Date:1/9/2018 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description:HVAC CHANGEOUT Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1801-091 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:YAEGER SERVICES INC 5417961-8 Page 185 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:2/16/1995 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9502-247 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:KEMITZ A/C & HEATING Date:8/4/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9308-074 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NOLTE ROOFING 612 S ORANGE STREET Date:9/22/1989 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8909-448 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:A-AMES PLUMBING HEATING 5417961-8 Page 186 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:7/7/1989 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:8907-092 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ARMSTRONG ROOFING W LA VETA 121 W LA VETA Date:12/15/1997 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9712-190 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:AUSTIN COURT 5417961-8 Page 187 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 205 W LA VETA Date:10/1/1998 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:DEMO RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9810-013 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CITY OF ORANGE-FRANK SUN Date:5/16/1994 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9405-287 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GEORGE WALKER Date:6/26/1991 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9106-475 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:VIC BASCONE 5417961-8 Page 188 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 235 W LA VETA Date:7/1/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:0407-004 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ORANGE HOUSING DEV CORP Date:5/18/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:BLOCK WAL Proposed Use: Permit Number:0405-178 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ORANGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Date:8/26/2003 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0308-311 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ORANGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT 5417961-8 Page 189 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:8/6/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:NEW MULTI Proposed Use: Permit Number:0208-119 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RICHARD HANSON Date:8/6/2003 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:NEW MULTI Proposed Use: Permit Number:0208-120 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:RICHARD HANSON Date:5/16/1994 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9405-281 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:GEORGE WALKER 5417961-8 Page 190 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 302 W LA VETA Date:1/16/2008 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:0801-112 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:OC REGIONAL SURGERY CENTER Date:2/16/2007 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:0702-194 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MARK CANTI Date:9/13/2006 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:SIGNS Proposed Use: Permit Number:0609-140 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:HOLY FAMILY CHURCH 5417961-8 Page 191 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:9/1/2005 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:REROOF Proposed Use: Permit Number:0509-004 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANG Date:11/30/2004 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:FIRE Proposed Use: Permit Number:0411-056 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:SPERRY VAN NESS Date:8/17/2000 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:0008-177 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:O.C. SPORTS MEDICINE 5417961-8 Page 192 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/9/1996 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:OUT/SCOPE Proposed Use: Permit Number:9610-124 Status:SUBMITTED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:G.M. SIGNS Date:9/13/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9308-407 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JB SERVICES Date:5/6/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9305-091 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:FIRE PROTECTION BY GUARDIAN 5417961-8 Page 193 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/24/1993 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9303-356 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MCCABE DEVELOPMENT Date:3/24/1993 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9303-355 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MCCABE DEVELOPMENT Date:10/5/1992 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9210-048 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 194 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:10/5/1992 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9210-062 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:1/29/1992 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9201-350 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LEE MENDORA Date:1/17/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9201-211 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 5417961-8 Page 195 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/16/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9201-194 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: Date:1/10/1992 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:9201-108 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:IRVINE WEST HEATING & A/C Date:11/13/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMML Proposed Use: Permit Number:9111-194 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ARCHITECTS ORANBGE 5417961-8 Page 196 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS W LA VETA AVE 200 W LA VETA AVE Date:9/26/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:VOLUNTARY STRUCTURAL UPGRADE Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1208-046 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION SERV Date:5/10/2012 Permit Type:ELECTRICAL Description:ELECTRICAL FOR PERMIT #1112-089 Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1205-102 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:NORTH AMERICA POWER & LIGHTING 5417961-8 Page 197 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:1/24/2012 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:REMODEL RECTORY Permit Description: Work Class:ADD/ALTER RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:1112-089 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DBA CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION SERV Date:11/23/2011 Permit Type:BUILDING Description:MINOR INTERIOR DEMO Permit Description: Work Class:T.I. Proposed Use: Permit Number:1111-186 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:DBA CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION SERV Date:11/16/2011 Permit Type:PLUMBING Description:COPPER REPIPE/GAS REPIPE Permit Description: Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number:1111-136 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANG 5417961-8 Page 198 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/16/2011 Permit Type:MISCELLANEOUS Description:SPECIAL EVENT Permit Description: Work Class:SPECIAL EVENTS Proposed Use: Permit Number:MISC1103-009 Status:ISSUED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:MICHAEL PRATER Date:6/25/1990 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9005-587 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:JOHN BARTLETT 202 W LA VETA AVE Date:1/8/2015 Permit Type:COMMERCIAL Description:FIRE DAMAGE REPAIRS + REMODEL EXISTING FLOOR AREAS Permit Description: Work Class:TENANT IMPROVEMENT Proposed Use: Permit Number:1501-090 Status:FINALIZED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5417961-8 Page 199 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS W LA VETA AVENUE 126 W LA VETA AVENUE Date:6/14/1991 Permit Type:BUILDING Description: Permit Description: Work Class:RES Proposed Use: Permit Number:9106-266 Status:FINALED Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:LINNERT ROOFING 208 W LA VETA AVENUE Date:3/16/1989 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:8903-413 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ANDERSON AIR CONDITIONING,INC 5417961-8 Page 200 Year Uses Source ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date:3/16/1989 Permit Type:MECHANICAL Description: Permit Description: Work Class:COMM Proposed Use: Permit Number:8903-420 Status:PO OPEN Valuation:$0.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name:ANDERSON AIR CONDITIONING,INC 5417961-8 Page 201 GLOSSARY General Building Department concepts .ICC: The International Code Council. The governing body for the building/development codes used by all jurisdictions who’ve adopted the ICC guidelines. MOST of the US has done this. Canada, Mexico, and other countries use ICC codes books and guides as well. There are a few states who have added guidelines to the ICC codes to better fit their needs. For example, California has added seismic retrofit requirements for most commercial structures..Building Department (Permitting Authority, Building Codes, Inspections Department, Building and Inspections): This is the department in a jurisdiction where an owner or contractor goes to obtain permits and inspections for building, tearing down, remodeling, adding to, re-roofing, moving or otherwise making changes to any structure, Residential or Commercial..Jurisdiction: This is the geographic area representing the properties over which a Permitting Authority has responsibility..GC: General Contractor. Usually the primary contractor hired for any Residential or Commercial construction work..Sub: Subordinate contracting companies or subcontractors. Usually a “trades” contractor working for the GC. These contractors generally have an area of expertise in which they are licensed like Plumbing, Electrical, Heating and Air systems, Gas Systems, Pools etc. (called “trades”)..Journeymen: Sub contractors who have their own personal licenses in one or more trades and work for different contracting companies, wherever they are needed or there is work...HVAC (Mechanical, Heating & Air companies): HVAC = Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. ELEC (Electrical, TempPole, TPole, TPower, Temporary Power, Panel, AMP Change, Power Release): Electrical permits can be pulled for many reasons. The most common reason is to increase the AMPs of power in an electrical power panel. This requires a permit in almost every jurisdiction. Other commons reason for Electrical permits is to insert a temporary power pole at a new construction site. Construction requires electricity, and in a new development, power has yet to be run to the lot. The temporary power pole is usually the very first permit pulled for new development. The power is released to the home owner when construction is complete and this sometimes takes the form of a Power Release permit or inspection...“Pull” a permit: To obtain and pay for a building permit. .CBO: Chief Building Official Planning Department: The department in the development process where the building /structural plans are reviewed for their completeness and compliance with building codes.Zoning Department: The department in the development process where the site plans are reviewed for their compliance with the regulations associated with the zoning district in which they are situated..Zoning District: A pre-determined geographic boundary within a jurisdiction where certain types of structures are permitted / prohibited. Examples are Residential structure, Commercial/Retail structures, Industrial/Manufacturing structures etc. Each zoning district has regulations associated with it like the sizes of the lots, the density of the structures on the lots, the number of parking spaces required for certain types of structures on the lots etc...PIN (TMS, GIS ID, Parcel#): Property Identification Number and Tax Map System number. .State Card (Business license): A license card issued to a contractor to conduct business. Building Inspector (Inspector): The inspector is a building department employee that inspects building construction for compliance to codes..C.O.: Certificate of Occupancy. This is the end of the construction process and designates that the owners now have permission to occupy a structure after its building is complete. Sometimes also referred to as a Certificate of Compliance. GLOSSARY Permit Content Definitions .Permit Number: The alphanumerical designation assigned to a permit for tracking within the building department system. Sometimes the permit number gives clues to its role, e.g. a "PL" prefix may designate a plumbing permit..Description: A field on the permit form that allows the building department to give a brief description of the work being done. More often than not, this is the most important field for EP’s to find clues to the prior use(s) of the property..Permit Type: Generally a brief designation of the type of job being done. For example BLDG-RES, BLDG- COM, ELEC, MECH etc. Sample Building Permit Data Date: Nov 09, 2000 Permit Type: Bldg - New Permit Number: 101000000405 Status: Valuation: $1,000,000.00 Contractor Company: OWNER-BUILDER Contractor Name: Description: New one store retail (SAV-ON) with drive-thru pharmacy. Certificate of Occupancy. APPENDIX G Geoenvironmental Report Geoenvironmental studies are commissioned to gain information about environmental conditions on and beneath the surface of a site. The more comprehensive the study, the more reliable the assessment is likely to be. But remember: Any such assessment is to a greater or lesser extent based on professional opinions about conditions that cannot be seen or tested. Accordingly, no matter how many data are developed, risks created by unanticipated conditions will always remain. Have realistic expectations. Work with your geoenvironmental consultant to manage known and unknown risks. Part of that process should already have been accomplished, through the risk allocation provisions you and your geoenvironmental professional discussed and included in your contract’s general terms and conditions. This document is intended to explain some of the concepts that may be included in your agreement, and to pass along information and suggestions to help you manage your risk. Beware of Change; Keep Your Geoenvironmental Professional Advised The design of a geoenvironmental study considers a variety of factors that are subject to change. Changes can undermine the applicability of a report’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Advise your geoenvironmental professional about any changes you become aware of. Geoenvironmental professionals cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because a report fails to consider conditions that did not exist when the study was designed. Ask your geoenvironmental professional about the types of changes you should be particularly alert to. Some of the most common include: • modification of the proposed development or ownership group, • sale or other property transfer, • replacement of or additions to the financing entity, • amendment of existing regulations or introduction of new ones, or • changes in the use or condition of adjacent property. Should you become aware of any change, do not rely on a geoenvironmental report. Advise your geoenvironmental professional immediately; follow the professional’s advice. Recognize the Impact of Time A geoenvironmental professional’s findings, recommendations, and conclusions cannot remain valid indefinitely. The more time that passes, the more likely it is that important latent changes will occur. Do not rely on a geoenvironmental report if too much time has elapsed since it was completed. Ask your environmental professional to define “too much time.” In the case of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), for example, more than 180 days after submission is generally considered “too much.” Prepare To Deal with Unanticipated Conditions The findings, recommendations, and conclusions of a Phase I ESA report typically are based on a review of historical information, interviews, a site “walkover,” and other forms of noninvasive research. When site subsurface conditions are not sampled in any way, the risk of unanticipated conditions is higher than it would otherwise be. While borings, installation of monitoring wells, and similar invasive test methods can help reduce the risk of unanticipated conditions, do not overvalue the effectiveness of testing. Testing provides information about actual conditions only at the precise locations where samples are taken, and only when they are taken. Your geoenvironmental Important Information about This professional has applied that specific information to develop a general opinion about environmental conditions. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ (sometimes sharply) from those predicted in a report. For example, a site may contain an unregistered underground storage tank that shows no surface trace of its existence. Even conditions in areas that were tested can change, sometimes suddenly, due to any number of events, not the least of which include occurrences at adjacent sites. Recognize, too, that even some conditions in tested areas may go undiscovered, because the tests or analytical methods used were designed to detect only those conditions assumed to exist. Manage your risks by retaining your geoenvironmental professional to work with you as the project proceeds. Establish a contingency fund or other means to enable your geoenvironmental professional to respond rapidly, in order to limit the impact of unforeseen conditions. And to help prevent any misunderstanding, identify those empowered to authorize changes and the administrative procedures that should be followed. Do Not Permit Any Other Party To Rely on the Report Geoenvironmental professionals design their studies and prepare their reports to meet the specific needs of the clients who retain them, in light of the risk management methods that the client and geoenvironmental professional agree to, and the statutory, regulatory, or other requirements that apply. The study designed for a developer may differ sharply from one designed for a lender, insurer, public agency...or even another developer. Unless the report specifically states otherwise, it was developed for you and only you. Do not unilaterally permit any other party to rely on it. The report and the study underlying it may not be adequate for another party’s needs, and you could be held liable for shortcomings your geoenvironmental professional was powerless to prevent or anticipate. Inform your geoenvironmental professional when you know or expect that someone else— a third-party—will want to use or rely on the report. Do not permit third-party use or reliance until you first confer with the geoenvironmental professional who prepared the report. Additional testing, analysis, or study may be required and, in any event, appropriate terms and conditions should be agreed to so both you and your geoenvironmental professional are protected from third-party risks. Any party who relies on a geoenvironmental report without the express written permission of the professional who prepared it and the client for whom it was prepared may be solely liable for any problems that arise. Avoid Misinterpretation of the Report Design professionals and other parties may want to rely on the report in developing plans and specifications. They need to be advised, in writing, that their needs may not have been considered when the study’s scope was developed, and, even if their needs were considered, they might misinterpret geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Commission your geoenvironmental professional to explain pertinent elements of the report to others who are permitted to rely on it, and to review any plans, specifications or other instruments of professional service that incorporate any of the report’s findings, conclusions, or recommendations. Your geoenvironmental professional has the best understanding of the issues involved, including the fundamental assumptions that underpinned the study’s scope. Give Contractors Access to the Report Reduce the risk of delays, claims, and disputes by giving contractors access to the full report, providing that it is accompanied by a letter of transmittal that can protect you by making it unquestionably clear that: 1) the study was not conducted and the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development, and 2) the findings, conclusions, and recommendations included in the report are based on a variety of opinions, inferences, and assumptions and are subject to interpretation. Use the letter to also advise contractors to consult with your geoenvironmental professional to obtain clarifications, interpretations, and guidance (a fee may be required for this service), and that—in any event—they should conduct additional studies to obtain the specific type and extent of information each prefers for preparing a bid or cost estimate. Providing access to the full report, with the appropriate caveats, helps prevent formation of adversarial attitudes and claims of concealed or differing conditions. If a contractor elects to ignore the warnings and advice in the letter of transmittal, it would do so at its own risk. Your geoenvironmental professional should be able to help you prepare an effective letter. Do Not Separate Documentation from the Report Geoenvironmental reports often include supplemental documentation, such as maps and copies of regulatory files, permits, registrations, citations, and correspondence with regulatory agencies. If subsurface explorations were performed, the report may contain final boring logs and copies of laboratory data. If remediation activities occurred on site, the report may include: copies of daily field reports; waste manifests; and information about the disturbance of subsurface materials, the type and thickness of any fill placed on site, and fill placement practices, among other types of documentation. Do not separate supplemental documentation from the report. Do not, and do not permit any other party to redraw or modify any of the supplemental documentation for incorporation into other professionals’ instruments of service. Understand the Role of Standards Unless they are incorporated into statutes or regulations, standard practices and standard guides developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and other recognized standards-developing organizations (SDOs) are little more than aspirational methods agreed to by a consensus of a committee. The committees that develop standards may not comprise those best-qualified to establish methods and, no matter what, no standard method can possibly consider the infinite client- and project-specific variables that fly in the face of the theoretical “standard conditions” to which standard practices and standard guides apply. In fact, these variables can be so pronounced that geoenvironmental professionals who comply with every directive of an ASTM or other standard procedure could run afoul of local custom and practice, thus violating the standard of care. Accordingly, when geoenvironmental professionals indicate in their reports that they have performed a service “in general compliance” with one standard or another, it means they have applied professional judgement in creating and implementing a scope of service designed for the specific client and project involved, and which follows some of the general precepts laid out in the referenced standard. To the extent that a report indicates “general compliance” with a standard, you may wish to speak with your geoenvironmental professional to learn more about what was and was not done. Do not assume a given standard was followed to the letter. Research indicates that that seldom is the case. Realize That Recommendations May Not Be Final The technical recommendations included in a geoenvironmental report are based on assumptions about actual conditions, and so are preliminary or tentative. Final recommendations can be prepared only by observing actual conditions as they are exposed. For that reason, you should retain the geoenvironmental professional of record to observe construction and/or remediation activities on site, to permit rapid response to unanticipated conditions. The geoenvironmental professional who prepared the report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report’s recommendations if that professional is not retained to observe relevant site operations. Understand That Geotechnical Issues Have Not Been Addressed Unless geotechnical engineering was specifically included in the scope of professional service, a report is not likely to relate any findings, conclusions, or recommendations about the suitability of subsurface materials for construction purposes, especially when site remediation has been accomplished through the removal, replacement, encapsulation, or chemical treatment of on-site soils. The equipment, techniques, and testing used by geotechnical engineers differ markedly from those used by geoenvironmental professionals; their education, training, and experience are also significantly different. If you plan to build on the subject site, but have not yet had a geotechnical engineering study conducted, your geoenvironmental professional should be able to provide guidance about the next steps you should take. The same firm may provide the services you need. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Geoenvironmental studies cannot be exact; they are based on professional judgement and opinion. Nonetheless, some clients, contractors, and others assume geoenvironmental reports are or certainly should be unerringly precise. Such assumptions have created unrealistic expectations that have led to wholly unwarranted claims and disputes. To help prevent such problems, geoenvironmental professionals have developed a number of report provisions and contract terms that explain who is responsible for what, and how risks are to be allocated. Some people mistake these for “exculpatory clauses,” that is, provisions whose purpose is to transfer one party’s rightful responsibilities and liabilities to someone else. Read the responsibility provisions included in a report and in the contract you and your geoenvironmental professional agreed to. Responsibility provisions are not “boilerplate.” They are important. Rely on Your Geoenvironmental Professional for Additional Assistance Membership in the Geoprofessional Business Association exposes geoenvironmental professionals to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a geoenvironmental project. Confer with your GBA-member geoenvironmental professional for more information. 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2015 by the Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, copying, or storage of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBA’s specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only GBA-Member Firms may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geoenvironmental report. Any other firm, individual, or entity that so uses this document without being a GBA-Member Firm could be committing negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation. LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 574 SOUTH GLASSELL STREET, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Prepared for KC ORANGE II, L.P. 5791 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No. 12137.003 September 6, 2019 September 6, 2019 Project No. 12137.003 KC Orange II, L.P. 5791 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Axel Guerra Subject: Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 574 South Glassell Street, Orange, California INTRODUCTION Leighton Consulting, Inc. (Leighton) is pleased to present this report summarizing the Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) activities completed for the proposed assisted living facility development located at 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, California (site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The site is a 0.85-acre rectangular lot, located west of South Glassell Street and bounded by Holy Family Cathedral Church and School to the north and west, Park Plaza (an existing senior assisted living center) to the south, and South Glassell Street, followed by residential properties, to the west. The site is currently occupied by an approximately 5,900-square foot building that is used as a restaurant and an asphalt- paved parking lot. 12137.003 - 2 - Based on information obtained during our Phase I ESA prepared for the site (September 2018), the site was utilized as orchards from at least 1938 until approximately 1960, when the present-day building was constructed onsite. The structure housed a restaurant and the clubhouse associated with the adjacent Holo Wai Miniature Golf Course, located to the south of the site. The adjacent miniature golf course closed in the mid-1980s, and the site remained a restaurant and parking lot. The historic use of the site as an orchard was considered a REC and additional assessment was recommended. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the Limited Phase II ESA was to determine what, if any, environmental impacts are present in the near surface soil as a result of the historic use of the site, which could affect the future redevelopment of the site. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work included the following: Advancement of 8 initial soil borings (LB1 through LB8) to a total depth of 5 feet below ground surface (bgs) and collection of soil samples for chemical analysis; Advancement of 15 step-out soil borings around initial borings LB1 and LB4, and collection of soil samples for chemical analysis; and Preparation of this report summarizing our findings and conclusions, including tables, illustrations, and appendices. PHASE II ESA Health and Safety Plan Prior to starting work, Leighton prepared a site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HSP) to include safety aspects of the work performed at the site. The HSP was in compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health and Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1910.120. The HSP was onsite with Leighton personnel at all times. The HSP outlined site procedures, potential hazards, and contains a hospital location map. All onsite Leighton personnel signed the HSP acknowledging acceptance. 12137.003 - 3 - Utility Clearance Underground Service Alert (USA) was contacted at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of fieldwork to mark underground utility locations originating off-site from public utilities. Each proposed boring location was clearly marked in white paint prior to contacting USA. Field Activities Soil Sampling On August 14, 2019, Leighton directed the advancement of 8 soil borings to a depth of 5 feet bgs throughout the site (Figure 2). The borings were advanced using direct push and hand auger drilling equipment operated by Strongarm Environmental (Strongarm), a State of California licensed drilling contractor. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0.5, 2.5, and 5.0 feet bgs, for lithologic description and chemical analysis. Soil samples were logged and described under direct supervision of a licensed California Professional Geologist (PG) and were retained in either 6-inch acetate sleeves capped with Teflon® paper and plastic end caps or 8-ounce laboratory-supplied glass jars. The containers were clearly marked with sample identification, placed in an ice-cooled chest for temporary storage, and transported to Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. (ATL) of Signal Hill, California for chemical analysis. Chain-of-custody protocol was followed throughout all phases of the sample handling process. Boring logs are included in Appendix B. On August 30, 2019, Leighton directed the advancement of 15 step-out soil borings, located a distance of approximately 5 and 15 feet laterally from initial borings LB1 and LB4, based on the results of chemical analyses completed on soil samples collected from those borings (Figure 2). Seven borings were advanced around LB1 and eight borings were advanced around LB4 to a total depth of 2.5 feet bgs. The borings were advanced using direct push and hand auger drilling equipment operated by Strongarm. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0.5 and 2.5 feet bgs from each boring for lithologic description and chemical analysis. The sampling protocol listed above for the initial soil sampling activities was followed for the step-out soil sampling activities. 12137.003 - 4 - Laboratory Analysis The 0.5 and 2.5 foot soil samples collected from the site on August 14, 2019 were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8081 and arsenic by EPA Method 6010B. The step-out soil samples collected in the vicinity of boring LB1 on August 29, 2019 were analyzed for OCPs by EPA Method 8081. The step-out soil samples collected in the vicinity of boring LB4 on August 29, 2019 were analyzed for arsenic by EPA Method 6010B. Copies of the chain of custody forms and complete analytical reports are included in Appendix C. RESULTS Soil Analytical Results The soil analytical results were compared to one or more of the following regulatory screening criteria: The EPA Region IX Residential Regional Screening Levels (RSLs, April 2019); The DTSC Office of Human and Ecological Risk (HERO) Note Number 3 (April 2019); and The DTSC Southern California Background concentration of 12 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) for arsenic. A summary of laboratory results are presented in Tables 1 and 2 and below. Initial Soil Borings OCPs Three OCPs were detected in soil samples collected from the site. Dieldrin was detected in two of the 16 initial soil samples at concentrations of 24 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg) in sample LB3-0.5 and 170 µg/kg in sample LB1- 12137.003 - 5 - 0.5. The detection of dieldrin in sample LB1-0.5 exceeded the residential RSL of 34 µg/kg. 4-4’-DDE was detected in six of the 16 soil samples analyzed during this investigation at concentrations ranging from 2.9 µg/kg (LB6-0.5) to 340 µg/kg (LB3-0.5). The detections of 4-4’-DDE did not exceed the residential RSL of 2,000 µg/kg. 4-4’-DDT was detected in four of the 16 soil samples analyzed during this investigation at concentrations ranging from 2.6 µg/kg (LB5-0.5) to 170 µg/kg (LB3-0.5). The detections of 4-4’-DDT did not exceed the residential RSL of 1,900 µg/kg. Arsenic Arsenic was detected in each of the initial soil samples analyzed during this investigation. Arsenic was detected in four soil samples (LB4-0.5, LB5-0.5, LB6-0.5, and LB7-0.5) at concentrations exceeding the DTSC-accepted Southern California Background Concentration for arsenic of 12 mg/kg. The maximum detected concentration of arsenic was 19 mg/kg in sample LB4- 0.5. Step-out Soil Borings Due to the exceedances of OCP and arsenic screening limits in soil samples collected from initial borings LB1 and LB4, step-out soil borings were advanced in the vicinity of these borings in an effort to determine the extent of the contamination in near surface soil. OCPs Three OCPs were detected in step-out soil samples collected in the vicinity of initial boring LB1. Dieldrin was detected in eight of the 14 step-out soil samples at concentrations ranging from 3.8 µg/kg (LB1-SW2-2.5) to 160 µg/kg (LB1-SW2-0.5). Seven of the eight detections of dieldrin exceeded the residential RSL of 34 µg/kg. 4-4’-DDE was detected in six of the 14 step-out soil samples at concentrations ranging from 26 µg/kg (LB1-NE2-0.5) to 170 µg/kg (LB1-SW2-0.5). The detections of 4-4’-DDE did not exceed the residential RSL of 2,000 µg/kg. 12137.003 - 6 - 4-4’-DDT was detected in four of the 16 soil samples analyzed during this investigation at concentrations ranging from 12 µg/kg (LB1-SW1-2.5) to 28 µg/kg (LB1-SW2-0.5). The detections of 4-4’-DDT did not exceed the residential RSL of 1,900 µg/kg. Arsenic Arsenic was detected in each of the step-out soil samples analyzed during this investigation. Arsenic was detected in four step-out soil samples (LB4-E2-0.5, LB4-N1- 0.5, LB4-N2-0.5, and LB4-W2-0.5) at concentrations exceeding the DTSC-accepted Southern California Background Concentrations for arsenic of 12 mg/kg. The maximum detected concentration of arsenic was 19 mg/kg in sample LB4-W2-0.5. Statistical Analysis The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s statistical program, ProUCL, version 5.1, was used to evaluate the concentrations of arsenic detected in soil samples collected during the field activities. Arsenic exceeded the respective DTSC-accepted Southern California Background Concentration in eight of the total soil samples collected from the subject site. However, because the maximum detected concentration of arsenic was 19 mg/kg and still within the upper end of naturally occurring arsenic levels in Southern California, a statistical evaluation of the arsenic dataset was completed to determine if arsenic would be considered a contaminant of concern and would require remediation (removal) prior to redevelopment of the site. It should be noted that due to elevated levels of dieldrin (an OCP), removals will be required in the upper 2 feet in the vicinity of boring LB1 and as such the arsenic data collected from this boring at a depth of 0.5 feet bgs was removed from the dataset prior to calculation of the 95% UCL. The 95% UCL of the population mean for arsenic was calculated to be 11.22 mg/kg, which is below the screening value of 12 mg/kg for arsenic. Assuming the upper 2 feet of soil in the vicinity of boring LB1 is removed prior to redevelopment of the site; arsenic in near surface soil at the site is not anticipated to pose a significant health risk to future residents. Statistical analysis spreadsheets are included in Appendix D, following the laboratory reports. 12137.003 - 7 - CONCLUSIONS Soil sample analytical results indicate that soil in the southwest portion of the site, in the vicinity of boring LB1, contains dieldrin at concentrations exceeding the RSL for residential land use. The exceedances of dieldrin are primarily limited to soil samples collected at a depth of 0.5 feet bgs, with the exception of LB1-SW1-2.5 at 2.5 feet bgs. The northwestern lateral extent of the dieldrin-impacted soil is not well defined due to limitations posed by the current onsite structure; however, borings LB2, LB7, and LB8 provide a rough estimate of lateral delineation and indicate that the dieldrin-impacted soil is confined to the southeast portion of the site. Arsenic was detected in near surface soil samples throughout the site at concentrations ranging from 1.9 mg/kg to 19 m/kg. Excluding arsenic data collected from boring LB1 (which is recommended for removal based on co-located elevated dieldrin concentrations), the 95% UCL of the population mean for arsenic was calculated to be 11.22 mg/kg. Based on the results of statistical analysis, arsenic in near surface soil at the site is not considered a contaminant of concern and not anticipated to pose a significant health risk to future residents. RECOMMENDATIONS To address the exceedances of dieldrin in near surface soil samples collected from the southeast portion of the site, Leighton recommends the excavation and offsite disposal of soil to a depth of approximately 2 feet bgs. Deeper removals may be necessary in the vicinity of step-out boring LB1-SW2 and can be confirmed during removal activities. Upon completion of removal activities, confirmation soil samples should be collected from the resulting excavation area to ensure that the dieldrin-impacted soil has been effectively removed. All work should be completed under the oversight of a California- registered Professional Geologist or Engineer with environmental consulting experience. In general, observations should be made during any future site redevelopment for areas of possible contamination such as, but not limited to, the presence of underground facilities, buried debris, waste drums, tanks, stained soil or odorous soils. Should such materials be encountered, further investigation and analysis may be necessary at that time. 12137.003 - 8 - LIMITATIONS This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. The observations and conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based on the scope of activities, work schedule, and information obtained through the activities described herein, and are limited to the portion of the site investigated. Opinions presented herein apply to property conditions existing at the time of our study and cannot necessarily be taken to apply to property conditions outside of the area investigated or changes that we are not aware of or have not had the opportunity to evaluate. It must be recognized that conclusions drawn from these data are limited to the portion of the site investigated, and the amount, type, distribution, and integrity of the information collected at the time of the investigation, and the methods utilized to collect and evaluate the data. Although Leighton has taken steps to obtain true copies of available information, we make no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by others. 12137.003 - 9 - CLOSING We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please call us at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Brynn McCulloch, PG Principal Geologist BFM Attachments: Table 1 – Soil Analytical Results for Arsenic Table 2 – Soil Analytical Results for OCPs Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2 – Site Plan Appendix A – References Appendix B – Boring Logs Appendix C – Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Records Appendix D – ProUCL Output Distribution: (1) Addressee ³ 0 2,000 4,000 Feet Figu re 1 Scale: Leighton Base Map : ESRI ArcGIS Online 20 18 Thematic In fo rmation: Leighton 1 " = 2,000 ' Projec t: 12137.001 Eng/Geol: BFM Map S aved as P :\Drafti ng\12137\001 \Maps\12137 -001 _F0 1 _S LM _2 018-09-20.mxd on 9 /2 0/2018 1 :28:08 P M Author: Le ighto n Geomatics (mmurp hy) Date: September 2018 SITE LOCATION MAP574 South Glassell StreetOrange, C alifornia Ap pro ximateSite Loca tion APPENDIX A REFERENCES 12137.003 A-1 APPENDIX A References Department of Toxic Substances Control, Human and Ecological Risk Office, Human Health Risk Assessment Note Number 3, dated April 2019. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2019, Region 9 Residential Regional Screening Levels, April 2019. APPENDIX B BORING LOGS @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB1-1.0 LB1-2.5 LB1-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPEGrab Sample N/A DRILLING METHOD RAL N/A / N/A TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. N/A REMARKS N/A / N/AHand Auger GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE N/A SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB1BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB2-1.0 LB2-2.5 LB2-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPETephlon Sleeve N/A DRILLING METHOD RAL N/A / N/A TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. N/A REMARKS N/A / N/AGeoProbe Direct Push GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE N/A SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB2BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB3-1.0 LB3-2.5 LB3-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPETephlon Sleeve DRILLING METHOD RAL TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. REMARKS GeoProbe Direct Push GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB3BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB4-1.0 LB4-2.5 LB4-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPETephlon Sleeve DRILLING METHOD RAL TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. REMARKS GeoProbe Direct Push GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB4BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB5-1.0 LB5-2.5 LB5-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPETephlon Sleeve DRILLING METHOD RAL TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. REMARKS GeoProbe Direct Push GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB5BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB6-1.0 LB6-2.5 LB6-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPETephlon Sleeve DRILLING METHOD RAL TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. REMARKS GeoProbe Direct Push GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB6BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB7-1.0 LB7-2.5 LB7-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPETephlon Sleeve DRILLING METHOD RAL TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. REMARKS GeoProbe Direct Push GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB7BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 @Surface: Top soil. @0.5': SILT, brown, slightly moist, trace sand, no odor or staining. @2.5': Sandy SILT, light brown, dry, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @3.5': SAND, greyish brown, fine to medium grained, no odor or staining. @5': Clayey SILT, brown, dry soft, no odor or staining. Notes: Total Depth of Boring: 5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered Backfilled with native soil. LB8-1.0 LB8-2.5 LB8-5.0 ML SM SP ML CASING TYPE/DIAMETER FILTER PACK TYPETephlon Sleeve DRILLING METHOD RAL TOTAL DRILL DEPTH DEPTH TO WATER 574 South Glassel Street, Orange, CA 5 TOP OF CASING ELEV. ft. REMARKS GeoProbe Direct Push GROUND ELEVATION LOGGED BY LOCATION SCREEN TYPE/SLOT SAMPLING METHOD GROUT TYPE SOIL BORING LOG DATE DRILLED 8/14/2019 PID (ppm)RECOVERY(inches)EXTENTPROJECT NUMBER LB8BORING/WELL NUMBER PROJECT NAME U.S.C.S.12137.003 5 10 KSL Communities LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTSDEPTH(ft. BGL)SAMPLE ID.GE_SBL KSL BORING LOGS.GPJ LAEWNN01.GDT 9/4/19 APPENDIX C LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS August 19, 2019 17781 Cowan Street Irvine, CA 92614 Brynn McCulloch Tel: (949) 681-4287 Fax:(949) 250-1114 ELAP No.: 1838 CSDLAC No.: 10196 ORELAP No.: CA300003 Leighton Consulting, Inc. RE:ATL Work Order Number : Client Reference : 1903032 Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on August, 14 2019 by Advanced Technology Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated on the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with applicable laboratory certifications. The laboratory results contained in this report specifically pertains to the sample(s) submitted. Thank you for the opportunity to serve the needs of your company. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or your Project Manager. Sincerely, President & Laboratory Director 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Edgar Caballero The cover letter and the case narrative are an integral part of this analytical report and its absence renders the report invalid. Test results contained within this data package meet the requirements of applicable state -specific certification programs. The report cannot be reproduced without written permission from the client and Advanced Technology Laboratories . 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 1 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received SUMMARY OF SAMPLES LB1-0.5 1903032-01 Soil 8/14/19 7:10 8/14/19 12:52 LB1-2.5 1903032-02 Soil 8/14/19 7:13 8/14/19 12:52 LB2-0.5 1903032-04 Soil 8/14/19 7:28 8/14/19 12:52 LB2-2.5 1903032-05 Soil 8/14/19 7:30 8/14/19 12:52 LB3-0.5 1903032-07 Soil 8/14/19 7:40 8/14/19 12:52 LB3-2.5 1903032-08 Soil 8/14/19 7:42 8/14/19 12:52 LB4-0.5 1903032-10 Soil 8/14/19 7:50 8/14/19 12:52 LB4-2.5 1903032-11 Soil 8/14/19 7:52 8/14/19 12:52 LB5-0.5 1903032-13 Soil 8/14/19 8:00 8/14/19 12:52 LB5-2.5 1903032-14 Soil 8/14/19 8:02 8/14/19 12:52 LB6-0.5 1903032-16 Soil 8/14/19 8:10 8/14/19 12:52 LB6-2.5 1903032-17 Soil 8/14/19 8:12 8/14/19 12:52 LB7-0.5 1903032-19 Soil 8/14/19 8:20 8/14/19 12:52 LB7-2.5 1903032-20 Soil 8/14/19 8:22 8/14/19 12:52 LB8-0.5 1903032-22 Soil 8/14/19 8:30 8/14/19 12:52 LB8-2.5 1903032-23 Soil 8/14/19 8:32 8/14/19 12:52 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 2 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-01 Client Sample ID LB1-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 4.6 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:000.121.0Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(ug/kg) MDLPQL (ug/kg) Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL 67 5 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 18:510.54104,4·-DDE [2C] 25 5 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 18:510.50104,4·-DDT [2C] 170 5 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 18:511.310Dieldrin [2C] 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 3 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-02 Client Sample ID LB1-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 5.6 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:040.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 4 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-04 Client Sample ID LB2-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 10 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:050.121.0Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(ug/kg) MDLPQL (ug/kg) Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL 330 5 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 19:130.54104,4·-DDE [2C] 18 5 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 19:130.50104,4·-DDT [2C] 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 5 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-05 Client Sample ID LB2-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 7.4 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:060.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 6 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-07 Client Sample ID LB3-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 4.4 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:070.121.0Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(ug/kg) MDLPQL (ug/kg) Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL 340 10 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/17/19 11:541.1204,4·-DDE [2C] 170 5 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 19:460.50104,4·-DDT [2C] 24 5 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 19:461.310Dieldrin [2C] 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 7 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-08 Client Sample ID LB3-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 11 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:080.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 8 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-10 Client Sample ID LB4-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 19 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:120.121.0Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(ug/kg) MDLPQL (ug/kg) Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL 15 2 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 20:080.224.04,4·-DDE [2C] 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 9 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-11 Client Sample ID LB4-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 9.5 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:130.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 10 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-13 Client Sample ID LB5-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 18 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:140.121.0Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(ug/kg) MDLPQL (ug/kg) Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL 88 2 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/17/19 11:430.224.04,4·-DDE [2C] 2.6 1 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 20:300.102.04,4·-DDT [2C] 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 11 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-14 Client Sample ID LB5-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 4.9 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:150.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 12 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-16 Client Sample ID LB6-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 17 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:160.121.0Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(ug/kg) MDLPQL (ug/kg) Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL 2.9 1 B9H0359 08/15/19 08:30 08/16/19 21:020.112.04,4·-DDE [2C] 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 13 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-17 Client Sample ID LB6-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 5.1 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:170.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 14 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-19 Client Sample ID LB7-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 15 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:180.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 15 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-20 Client Sample ID LB7-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 5.3 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:200.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 16 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-22 Client Sample ID LB8-0.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 1.9 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:210.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 17 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-23 Client Sample ID LB8-2.5 DETECTION SUMMARY Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution(mg/kg) MDLPQL (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV 4.8 1 B9H0329 08/14/19 16:07 08/16/19 13:220.121.0Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 18 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-01 Client Sample ID LB1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:001.04.6Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D110ND4,4·-DDD 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:5110674,4·-DDE [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:5110254,4·-DDT [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:5110170Dieldrin [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 70.1 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 72.5 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 18:51B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 19 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-02 Client Sample ID LB1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:041.05.6Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:028.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:022.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:021.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:025.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:0250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 72.2 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:02B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 71.8 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:02B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 20 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-04 Client Sample ID LB2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:051.010Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D110ND4,4·-DDD 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13103304,4·-DDE [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:1310184,4·-DDT [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D110NDDieldrin 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 70.9 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 80.3 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:13B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 21 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-05 Client Sample ID LB2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:061.07.4Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:248.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:242.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:241.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:245.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:2450NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 67.8 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:24B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 70.8 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:24B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 22 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-07 Client Sample ID LB3-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:071.04.4Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D110ND4,4·-DDD [2C] 10 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/17/19 11:54203404,4·-DDE [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46101704,4·-DDT [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:461024Dieldrin [2C] 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 71.9 %08/15/2019 08/17/19 11:54B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 74.3 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 71.6 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:46B9H035938 - 93 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 67.0 %08/15/2019 08/17/19 11:54B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 23 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-08 Client Sample ID LB3-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:081.011Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:578.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:572.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:571.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:575.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:5750NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 67.2 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:57B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 69.1 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 19:57B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 24 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-10 Client Sample ID LB4-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:121.019Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0ND4,4·-DDD 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:084.0154,4·-DDE [2C] 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0ND4,4·-DDT 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDAldrin 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDalpha-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDalpha-Chlordane 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDbeta-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D117NDChlordane 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDdelta-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0NDDieldrin 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDEndosulfan I 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0NDEndosulfan II 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0NDEndrin 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0NDEndrin aldehyde 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D14.0NDEndrin ketone 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDgamma-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDgamma-Chlordane 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDHeptachlor 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D12.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D110NDMethoxychlor 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08 D1100NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 62.3 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 71.2 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:08B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 25 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-11 Client Sample ID LB4-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:131.09.5Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:198.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:192.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:191.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:195.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:1950NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 69.9 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:19B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 78.8 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:19B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 26 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-13 Client Sample ID LB5-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:141.018Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.0ND4,4·-DDD 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/17/19 11:434.0884,4·-DDE [2C] 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.02.64,4·-DDT [2C] 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:308.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:302.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:301.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:305.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:3050NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 78.1 %08/15/2019 08/17/19 11:43B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 68.1 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:30B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 81.9 %08/15/2019 08/17/19 11:43B9H035938 - 93 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 77.3 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:30B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 27 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-14 Client Sample ID LB5-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:151.04.9Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:518.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:512.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:511.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:515.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:5150NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 59.0 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:51B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 66.9 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 20:51B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 28 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-16 Client Sample ID LB6-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:161.017Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.02.94,4·-DDE [2C] 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:028.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:022.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:021.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:025.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:0250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 61.2 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:02B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 65.0 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:02B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 29 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-17 Client Sample ID LB6-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:171.05.1Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:138.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:132.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:131.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:135.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:1350NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 59.2 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:13B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 68.9 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:13B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 30 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-19 Client Sample ID LB7-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:181.015Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:248.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:242.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:241.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:245.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:2450NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 51.0 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:24B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 55.7 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:24B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 31 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-20 Client Sample ID LB7-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:201.05.3Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:358.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:352.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:351.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:355.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:3550NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 62.9 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:35B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 71.5 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:35B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 32 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-22 Client Sample ID LB8-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:211.01.9Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0ND4,4·-DDD 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0ND4,4·-DDE 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0ND4,4·-DDT 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDAldrin 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDalpha-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDalpha-Chlordane 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDbeta-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D117NDChlordane 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDdelta-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0NDDieldrin 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDEndosulfan I 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0NDEndosulfan II 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0NDEndrin 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0NDEndrin aldehyde 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D14.0NDEndrin ketone 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDgamma-BHC 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDgamma-Chlordane 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDHeptachlor 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D12.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D110NDMethoxychlor 2 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46 D1100NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 72.3 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 76.3 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:46B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 33 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903032-23 Client Sample ID LB8-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: VV Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0329 08/14/2019 08/16/19 13:221.04.8Arsenic Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:578.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:572.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:571.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:575.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0359 08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:5750NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 73.2 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:57B9H035932 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 78.5 %08/15/2019 08/16/19 21:57B9H035938 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 34 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis QUALITY CONTROL SECTION Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B - Quality Control Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(mg/kg)(mg/kg)Notes MDL (mg/kg) Batch B9H0329 - EPA 3050B_S Blank (B9H0329-BLK1)Prepared: 8/14/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 ND 1.0Arsenic 0.12 LCS (B9H0329-BS1)Prepared: 8/14/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 45.1344 1.0 50.0000 90.3 80 - 120Arsenic0.12 Matrix Spike (B9H0329-MS1)Source: 1903032-01 Prepared: 8/14/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 97.6794 1.0 125.000 4.56534 74.5 46 - 97Arsenic0.12 Matrix Spike Dup (B9H0329-MSD1)Source: 1903032-01 Prepared: 8/14/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 100.082 1.0 125.000 4.56534 76.4 46 - 97 2.43 20Arsenic0.12 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 35 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0359 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S Blank (B9H0359-BLK1)Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 ND 2.04,4·-DDD 0.07 ND 2.04,4·-DDD [2C]0.07 ND 2.04,4·-DDE 0.11 ND 2.04,4·-DDE [2C]0.11 ND 2.04,4·-DDT 0.10 ND 2.04,4·-DDT [2C]0.10 ND 1.0Aldrin 0.12 ND 1.0Aldrin [2C]0.12 ND 1.0alpha-BHC 0.11 ND 1.0alpha-BHC [2C]0.11 ND 1.0alpha-Chlordane 0.12 ND 1.0alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.12 ND 1.0beta-BHC 0.06 ND 1.0beta-BHC [2C]0.06 ND 8.5Chlordane 1.1 ND 8.5Chlordane [2C]1.1 ND 1.0delta-BHC 0.12 ND 1.0delta-BHC [2C]0.12 ND 2.0Dieldrin 0.26 ND 2.0Dieldrin [2C]0.26 ND 1.0Endosulfan I 0.10 ND 1.0Endosulfan I [2C]0.10 ND 2.0Endosulfan II 0.15 ND 2.0Endosulfan II [2C]0.15 ND 2.0Endosulfan sulfate 0.16 ND 2.0Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.16 ND 2.0Endrin 0.14 ND 2.0Endrin [2C]0.14 ND 2.0Endrin aldehyde 0.31 ND 2.0Endrin aldehyde [2C]0.31 ND 2.0Endrin ketone 0.13 ND 2.0Endrin ketone [2C]0.13 ND 1.0gamma-BHC 0.10 ND 1.0gamma-BHC [2C]0.10 ND 1.0gamma-Chlordane 0.89 ND 1.0gamma-Chlordane [2C]0.89 ND 1.0Heptachlor 0.12 ND 1.0Heptachlor [2C]0.12 ND 1.0Heptachlor epoxide 0.09 ND 1.0Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.09 ND 5.0Methoxychlor 0.18 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 36 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0359 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) Blank (B9H0359-BLK1) - Continued Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 ND 5.0Methoxychlor [2C]0.18 ND 50Toxaphene 4.7 ND 50Toxaphene [2C]4.7 12.17 16.6667 73.0 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 12.61 16.6667 75.7 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2 12.32 16.6667 73.9 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 12.64 16.6667 75.8 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [ LCS (B9H0359-BS1)Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 14.7977 2.0 16.6667 88.8 66 - 1124,4·-DDD 0.07 17.2483 2.0 16.6667 103 66 - 1124,4·-DDD [2C]0.07 14.1175 2.0 16.6667 84.7 62 - 1124,4·-DDE 0.11 15.2837 2.0 16.6667 91.7 62 - 1124,4·-DDE [2C]0.11 12.8788 2.0 16.6667 77.3 48 - 904,4·-DDT 0.10 14.3430 2.0 16.6667 86.1 48 - 904,4·-DDT [2C]0.10 13.8368 1.0 16.6667 83.0 58 - 104Aldrin0.12 15.4180 1.0 16.6667 92.5 58 - 104Aldrin [2C]0.12 13.1013 1.0 16.6667 78.6 57 - 105alpha-BHC 0.11 14.4353 1.0 16.6667 86.6 57 - 105alpha-BHC [2C]0.11 14.0605 1.0 16.6667 84.4 62 - 108alpha-Chlordane 0.12 15.6607 1.0 16.6667 94.0 62 - 108alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.12 13.8307 1.0 16.6667 83.0 59 - 106beta-BHC 0.06 15.3072 1.0 16.6667 91.8 59 - 106beta-BHC [2C]0.06 10.5218 1.0 16.6667 63.1 63 - 115delta-BHC 0.12 11.3793 1.0 16.6667 68.3 63 - 115delta-BHC [2C]0.12 13.5813 2.0 16.6667 81.5 59 - 102Dieldrin0.26 14.9907 2.0 16.6667 89.9 59 - 102Dieldrin [2C]0.26 12.8417 1.0 16.6667 77.1 61 - 99Endosulfan I 0.10 14.6685 1.0 16.6667 88.0 61 - 99Endosulfan I [2C]0.10 14.1708 2.0 16.6667 85.0 65 - 105Endosulfan II 0.15 15.9623 2.0 16.6667 95.8 65 - 105Endosulfan II [2C]0.15 12.8973 2.0 16.6667 77.4 59 - 107Endosulfan sulfate 0.16 14.9992 2.0 16.6667 90.0 59 - 107Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.16 15.0547 2.0 16.6667 90.3 65 - 113Endrin0.14 17.1022 2.0 16.6667 103 65 - 113Endrin [2C]0.14 13.8740 2.0 16.6667 83.2 61 - 109Endrin aldehyde 0.31 15.8988 2.0 16.6667 95.4 61 - 109Endrin aldehyde [2C]0.31 13.3815 2.0 16.6667 80.3 56 - 97Endrin ketone 0.13 16.5282 2.0 16.6667 99.2 56 - 97 L3Endrin ketone [2C]0.13 13.5413 1.0 16.6667 81.2 57 - 101gamma-BHC 0.10 15.1270 1.0 16.6667 90.8 57 - 101gamma-BHC [2C]0.10 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 37 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0359 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) LCS (B9H0359-BS1) - Continued Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 13.6070 1.0 16.6667 81.6 56 - 125gamma-Chlordane 0.89 15.8502 1.0 16.6667 95.1 56 - 125gamma-Chlordane [2C]0.89 14.1095 1.0 16.6667 84.7 61 - 105Heptachlor0.12 17.4882 1.0 16.6667 105 61 - 105Heptachlor [2C]0.12 13.0805 1.0 16.6667 78.5 59 - 97Heptachlor epoxide 0.09 15.2162 1.0 16.6667 91.3 59 - 97Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.09 13.2317 5.0 16.6667 79.4 68 - 118Methoxychlor0.18 20.2058 5.0 16.6667 121 68 - 118 L3Methoxychlor [2C]0.18 13.12 16.6667 78.7 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 13.46 16.6667 80.7 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2 13.23 16.6667 79.4 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 13.71 16.6667 82.3 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [ Matrix Spike (B9H0359-MS1)Source: 1903032-23 Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 13.8617 2.0 16.6667 ND 83.2 33 - 1164,4·-DDD 0.07 16.0177 2.0 16.6667 ND 96.1 33 - 1164,4·-DDD [2C]0.07 13.3630 2.0 16.6667 ND 80.2 29 - 1284,4·-DDE 0.11 14.2300 2.0 16.6667 ND 85.4 29 - 1284,4·-DDE [2C]0.11 12.7310 2.0 16.6667 ND 76.4 27 - 1094,4·-DDT 0.10 15.9003 2.0 16.6667 ND 95.4 27 - 1094,4·-DDT [2C]0.10 12.9092 1.0 16.6667 ND 77.5 34 - 110Aldrin0.12 14.3618 1.0 16.6667 ND 86.2 34 - 110Aldrin [2C]0.12 12.4797 1.0 16.6667 ND 74.9 39 - 107alpha-BHC 0.11 13.5832 1.0 16.6667 ND 81.5 39 - 107alpha-BHC [2C]0.11 13.3102 1.0 16.6667 ND 79.9 37 - 111alpha-Chlordane 0.12 14.6798 1.0 16.6667 ND 88.1 37 - 111alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.12 13.3142 1.0 16.6667 ND 79.9 33 - 111beta-BHC 0.06 14.5035 1.0 16.6667 ND 87.0 33 - 111beta-BHC [2C]0.06 10.0313 1.0 16.6667 ND 60.2 25 - 122delta-BHC 0.12 10.7442 1.0 16.6667 ND 64.5 25 - 122delta-BHC [2C]0.12 12.9533 2.0 16.6667 ND 77.7 28 - 114Dieldrin0.26 13.9987 2.0 16.6667 ND 84.0 28 - 114Dieldrin [2C]0.26 12.0872 1.0 16.6667 ND 72.5 35 - 107Endosulfan I 0.10 13.7297 1.0 16.6667 ND 82.4 35 - 107Endosulfan I [2C]0.10 13.5202 2.0 16.6667 ND 81.1 13 - 122Endosulfan II 0.15 14.9895 2.0 16.6667 ND 89.9 13 - 122Endosulfan II [2C]0.15 12.3768 2.0 16.6667 ND 74.3 13 - 120Endosulfan sulfate 0.16 13.9483 2.0 16.6667 ND 83.7 13 - 120Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.16 14.5110 2.0 16.6667 ND 87.1 31 - 121Endrin0.14 16.3973 2.0 16.6667 ND 98.4 31 - 121Endrin [2C]0.14 12.9552 2.0 16.6667 ND 77.7 18 - 129Endrin aldehyde 0.31 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 38 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0359 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) Matrix Spike (B9H0359-MS1) - Continued Source: 1903032-23 Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 13.3975 2.0 16.6667 ND 80.4 18 - 129Endrin aldehyde [2C]0.31 13.3295 2.0 16.6667 ND 80.0 14 - 113Endrin ketone 0.13 16.0425 2.0 16.6667 ND 96.3 14 - 113Endrin ketone [2C]0.13 12.9550 1.0 16.6667 ND 77.7 34 - 104gamma-BHC 0.10 14.2202 1.0 16.6667 ND 85.3 34 - 104gamma-BHC [2C]0.10 12.9588 1.0 16.6667 ND 77.8 35 - 121gamma-Chlordane 0.89 15.0465 1.0 16.6667 ND 90.3 35 - 121gamma-Chlordane [2C]0.89 13.5515 1.0 16.6667 ND 81.3 35 - 110Heptachlor0.12 17.1880 1.0 16.6667 ND 103 35 - 110Heptachlor [2C]0.12 12.6845 1.0 16.6667 ND 76.1 31 - 106Heptachlor epoxide 0.09 14.4327 1.0 16.6667 ND 86.6 31 - 106Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.09 15.0033 5.0 16.6667 ND 90.0 21 - 128Methoxychlor0.18 21.5465 5.0 16.6667 ND 129 21 - 128 M1Methoxychlor [2C]0.18 11.85 16.6667 71.1 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 11.99 16.6667 71.9 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2 12.51 16.6667 75.0 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 12.82 16.6667 76.9 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [ Matrix Spike Dup (B9H0359-MSD1)Source: 1903032-23 Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 14.3495 2.0 16.6667 ND 86.1 33 - 116 3.46 204,4·-DDD 0.07 16.4715 2.0 16.6667 ND 98.8 33 - 116 2.79 204,4·-DDD [2C]0.07 13.8257 2.0 16.6667 ND 83.0 29 - 128 3.40 204,4·-DDE 0.11 14.6657 2.0 16.6667 ND 88.0 29 - 128 3.02 204,4·-DDE [2C]0.11 13.3385 2.0 16.6667 ND 80.0 27 - 109 4.66 204,4·-DDT 0.10 16.5845 2.0 16.6667 ND 99.5 27 - 109 4.21 204,4·-DDT [2C]0.10 13.2935 1.0 16.6667 ND 79.8 34 - 110 2.93 20Aldrin0.12 14.7613 1.0 16.6667 ND 88.6 34 - 110 2.74 20Aldrin [2C]0.12 12.6990 1.0 16.6667 ND 76.2 39 - 107 1.74 20alpha-BHC 0.11 13.6883 1.0 16.6667 ND 82.1 39 - 107 0.771 20alpha-BHC [2C]0.11 13.6220 1.0 16.6667 ND 81.7 37 - 111 2.32 20alpha-Chlordane 0.12 15.0865 1.0 16.6667 ND 90.5 37 - 111 2.73 20alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.12 13.7093 1.0 16.6667 ND 82.3 33 - 111 2.92 20beta-BHC 0.06 14.9012 1.0 16.6667 ND 89.4 33 - 111 2.70 20beta-BHC [2C]0.06 10.2957 1.0 16.6667 ND 61.8 25 - 122 2.60 20delta-BHC 0.12 11.0483 1.0 16.6667 ND 66.3 25 - 122 2.79 20delta-BHC [2C]0.12 13.4335 2.0 16.6667 ND 80.6 28 - 114 3.64 20Dieldrin0.26 14.4320 2.0 16.6667 ND 86.6 28 - 114 3.05 20Dieldrin [2C]0.26 12.4652 1.0 16.6667 ND 74.8 35 - 107 3.08 20Endosulfan I 0.10 14.1562 1.0 16.6667 ND 84.9 35 - 107 3.06 20Endosulfan I [2C]0.10 13.9570 2.0 16.6667 ND 83.7 13 - 122 3.18 20Endosulfan II 0.15 15.4757 2.0 16.6667 ND 92.9 13 - 122 3.19 20Endosulfan II [2C]0.15 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 39 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0359 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) Matrix Spike Dup (B9H0359-MSD1) - Continued Source: 1903032-23 Prepared: 8/15/2019 Analyzed: 8/16/2019 12.8638 2.0 16.6667 ND 77.2 13 - 120 3.86 20Endosulfan sulfate 0.16 14.2647 2.0 16.6667 ND 85.6 13 - 120 2.24 20Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.16 15.0465 2.0 16.6667 ND 90.3 31 - 121 3.62 20Endrin0.14 16.9948 2.0 16.6667 ND 102 31 - 121 3.58 20Endrin [2C]0.14 13.4240 2.0 16.6667 ND 80.5 18 - 129 3.55 20Endrin aldehyde 0.31 13.8263 2.0 16.6667 ND 83.0 18 - 129 3.15 20Endrin aldehyde [2C]0.31 13.8932 2.0 16.6667 ND 83.4 14 - 113 4.14 20Endrin ketone 0.13 16.6202 2.0 16.6667 ND 99.7 14 - 113 3.54 20Endrin ketone [2C]0.13 13.2717 1.0 16.6667 ND 79.6 34 - 104 2.41 20gamma-BHC 0.10 14.5850 1.0 16.6667 ND 87.5 34 - 104 2.53 20gamma-BHC [2C]0.10 13.2575 1.0 16.6667 ND 79.5 35 - 121 2.28 20gamma-Chlordane 0.89 15.4335 1.0 16.6667 ND 92.6 35 - 121 2.54 20gamma-Chlordane [2C]0.89 13.9577 1.0 16.6667 ND 83.7 35 - 110 2.95 20Heptachlor0.12 17.7563 1.0 16.6667 ND 107 35 - 110 3.25 20Heptachlor [2C]0.12 12.8362 1.0 16.6667 ND 77.0 31 - 106 1.19 20Heptachlor epoxide 0.09 14.8443 1.0 16.6667 ND 89.1 31 - 106 2.81 20Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.09 15.7442 5.0 16.6667 ND 94.5 21 - 128 4.82 20Methoxychlor0.18 21.6853 5.0 16.6667 ND 130 21 - 128 0.642 20 M1Methoxychlor [2C]0.18 12.37 16.6667 74.2 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 12.45 16.6667 74.7 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2 12.54 16.6667 75.2 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 12.99 16.6667 77.9 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [ 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 40 of 44 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : 574 South Glassell, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :08/19/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Notes and Definitions M1 Matrix spike recovery outside of acceptance limit. The analytical batch was validated by the laboratory control sample. L3 Laboratory control sample outside in-house established limits but within method criteria. D1 Sample required dilution due to possible matrix interference. ND Analyte is not detected at or above the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL). When client requests quantitation against MDL, analyte is not detected at or above the Method Detection Limit (MDL) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit MDL Method Detection Limit RPD Relative Percent Difference Not ReportedNR CA2 CA-ELAP (CDPH) OR-NELAP (OSPHL)OR1 Notes: (1) The reported MDL and PQL are based on prep ratio variation and analytical dilution. (2) The suffix [2C] of specific analytes signifies that the reported result is taken from the instrument’s second column. (3) Results are wet unless otherwise specified. 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 41 of 44 Page 42 of 44 Page 43 of 44 Page 44 of 44 September 03, 2019 17781 Cowan Street Irvine, CA 92614 Brynn McCulloch Tel: (949) 681-4287 Fax:(949) 250-1114 Leighton Consulting, Inc. ELAP No.: 1838 CSDLAC No.: 10196 ORELAP No.: CA300003 Re:ATL Work Order Number : Client Reference : 1903209 Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on August 29, 2019 by Advanced Technology Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated on the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with applicable laboratory certifications. The laboratory results contained in this report specifically pertains to the sample(s) submitted. Thank you for the opportunity to serve the needs of your company. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or your Project Manager. Sincerely, President & Laboratory Director Park Plaza, 12137.003 Edgar Caballero 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com The cover letter and the case narrative are an integral part of this analytical report and its absence renders the report invalid. Test results contained within this data package meet the requirements of applicable state-specific certification programs. The report cannot be reproduced without written permission from the client and Advanced Technology Laboratories . Page 1 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received SUMMARY OF SAMPLES LB4-S2-0.5 1903209-01 Soil 8/29/19 7:24 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-S2-2.5 1903209-02 Soil 8/29/19 7:25 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-E2-0.5 1903209-03 Soil 8/29/19 7:35 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-E2-2.5 1903209-04 Soil 8/29/19 7:37 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-E1-0.5 1903209-05 Soil 8/29/19 7:43 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-E1-2.5 1903209-06 Soil 8/29/19 7:45 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-S1-0.5 1903209-07 Soil 8/29/19 7:51 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-S1-2.5 1903209-08 Soil 8/29/19 7:53 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-W1-0.5 1903209-09 Soil 8/29/19 7:59 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-W1-2.5 1903209-10 Soil 8/29/19 8:00 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-N1-0.5 1903209-11 Soil 8/29/19 8:04 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-N1-2.5 1903209-12 Soil 8/29/19 8:07 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-W2-0.5 1903209-13 Soil 8/29/19 8:20 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-W2-2.5 1903209-14 Soil 8/29/19 8:22 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-N2-0.5 1903209-15 Soil 8/29/19 8:37 8/29/19 15:03 LB4-N2-2.5 1903209-16 Soil 8/29/19 8:40 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-NW1-0.5 1903209-17 Soil 8/29/19 7:15 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-NW1-2.5 1903209-18 Soil 8/29/19 7:16 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-NE1-0.5 1903209-19 Soil 8/29/19 7:26 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-NE1-2.5 1903209-20 Soil 8/29/19 7:27 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-NE2-0.5 1903209-21 Soil 8/29/19 7:39 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-NE2-2.5 1903209-22 Soil 8/29/19 7:41 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SE1-0.5 1903209-23 Soil 8/29/19 7:47 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SE1-2.5 1903209-24 Soil 8/29/19 7:49 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SE2-0.5 1903209-25 Soil 8/29/19 7:55 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SE2-2.5 1903209-26 Soil 8/29/19 7:57 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SW1-0.5 1903209-27 Soil 8/29/19 8:09 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SW1-2.5 1903209-28 Soil 8/29/19 8:12 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SW2-0.5 1903209-29 Soil 8/29/19 8:24 8/29/19 15:03 LB1-SW2-2.5 1903209-30 Soil 8/29/19 8:27 8/29/19 15:03 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 2 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis DETECTION SUMMARY Client Sample ID LB4-S2-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-01 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 7.1 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:06Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-S2-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-02 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 12 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:07Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-E2-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-03 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 14 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:08Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-E2-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-04 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 4.8 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:09Arsenic1.0 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 3 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis DETECTION SUMMARY Client Sample ID LB4-E1-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-05 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 11 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:14Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-E1-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-06 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 5.2 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:15Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-S1-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-07 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 5.5 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:16Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-S1-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-08 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 5.5 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:17Arsenic1.0 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 4 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis DETECTION SUMMARY Client Sample ID LB4-W1-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-09 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 2.5 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:19Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-W1-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-10 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 5.6 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:20Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-N1-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-11 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 14 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:21Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-N1-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-12 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 4.2 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:22Arsenic1.0 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 5 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis DETECTION SUMMARY Client Sample ID LB4-W2-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-13 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 19 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:24Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-W2-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-14 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 5.7 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:25Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-N2-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-15 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 15 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:29Arsenic1.0 Client Sample ID LB4-N2-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-16 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (mg/kg)Analyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK PQL (mg/kg) 5.6 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:30Arsenic1.0 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 6 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis DETECTION SUMMARY Client Sample ID LB1-NW1-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-17 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 73 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:264,4·-DDE 10 16 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:264,4·-DDT 10 99 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26Dieldrin10 Client Sample ID LB1-NE1-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-19 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 46 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:474,4·-DDE 10 150 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47Dieldrin10 Client Sample ID LB1-NE2-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-21 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 26 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:084,4·-DDE 10 48 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08Dieldrin10 Client Sample ID LB1-SE1-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-23 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 75 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29Dieldrin40 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 7 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis DETECTION SUMMARY Client Sample ID LB1-SE2-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-25 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 88 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:504,4·-DDE 10 23 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:504,4·-DDT 10 80 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50Dieldrin10 Client Sample ID LB1-SW1-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-28 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 65 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:214,4·-DDE 10 12 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:214,4·-DDT [2C]10 78 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21Dieldrin10 Client Sample ID LB1-SW2-0.5 Lab ID: 1903209-29 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 170 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:324,4·-DDE 10 28 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:324,4·-DDT [2C]10 160 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32Dieldrin10 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 8 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis DETECTION SUMMARY Client Sample ID LB1-SW2-2.5 Lab ID: 1903209-30 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilution Result (ug/kg)Analyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL PQL (ug/kg) 3.8 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:42Dieldrin2.0 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 9 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-01 Client Sample ID: LB4-S2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:061.07.1Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 10 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-02 Client Sample ID: LB4-S2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:071.012Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 11 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-03 Client Sample ID: LB4-E2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:081.014Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 12 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-04 Client Sample ID: LB4-E2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:091.04.8Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 13 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-05 Client Sample ID: LB4-E1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:141.011Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 14 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-06 Client Sample ID: LB4-E1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:151.05.2Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 15 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-07 Client Sample ID: LB4-S1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:161.05.5Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 16 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-08 Client Sample ID: LB4-S1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:171.05.5Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 17 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-09 Client Sample ID: LB4-W1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:191.02.5Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 18 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-10 Client Sample ID: LB4-W1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:201.05.6Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 19 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-11 Client Sample ID: LB4-N1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:211.014Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 20 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-12 Client Sample ID: LB4-N1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:221.04.2Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 21 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-13 Client Sample ID: LB4-W2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:241.019Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 22 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-14 Client Sample ID: LB4-W2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:251.05.7Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 23 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-15 Client Sample ID: LB4-N2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:291.015Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 24 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-16 Client Sample ID: LB4-N2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B Analyst: KEK Result (mg/kg)(mg/kg) PQL 1 B9H0741 08/30/2019 08/30/19 17:301.05.6Arsenic 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 25 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-17 Client Sample ID: LB1-NW1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D110ND4,4·-DDD 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:2610734,4·-DDE 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:2610164,4·-DDT 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:261099Dieldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 72.1 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 76.0 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:26B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 26 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-18 Client Sample ID: LB1-NW1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:368.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:362.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:361.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:365.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:3650NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 77.1 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:36B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 78.2 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:36B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 27 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-19 Client Sample ID: LB1-NE1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D110ND4,4·-DDD 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:4710464,4·-DDE 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D110ND4,4·-DDT [2C] 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:4710150Dieldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 83.4 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 79.3 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:47B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 28 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-20 Client Sample ID: LB1-NE1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:578.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:572.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:571.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:575.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:5750NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 72.2 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:57B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 72.3 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 18:57B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 29 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-21 Client Sample ID: LB1-NE2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D110ND4,4·-DDD 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:0810264,4·-DDE 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D110ND4,4·-DDT 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D142NDChlordane [2C] 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:081048Dieldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane [2C] 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 83.7 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 77.4 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:08B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 30 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-22 Client Sample ID: LB1-NE2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0ND4,4·-DDD [2C] 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:188.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0NDDieldrin [2C] 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:182.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:181.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:185.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:1850NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 70.7 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:18B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 71.1 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:18B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 31 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-23 Client Sample ID: LB1-SE1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140ND4,4·-DDD 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140ND4,4·-DDE 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140ND4,4·-DDT [2C] 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDAldrin 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDalpha-BHC 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDalpha-Chlordane 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDbeta-BHC 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D1170NDChlordane 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDdelta-BHC 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:294075Dieldrin 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDEndosulfan I 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140NDEndosulfan II 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140NDEndosulfan sulfate 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140NDEndrin 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140NDEndrin aldehyde 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D140NDEndrin ketone 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDgamma-BHC 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDgamma-Chlordane 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDHeptachlor 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D120NDHeptachlor epoxide 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D1100NDMethoxychlor 20 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29 D11000NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 49.7 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 51.3 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:29B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 32 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-24 Client Sample ID: LB1-SE1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:398.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0NDDieldrin [2C] 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:392.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:391.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:395.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:3950NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 71.5 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:39B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 74.0 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:39B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 33 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-25 Client Sample ID: LB1-SE2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D110ND4,4·-DDD 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:5010884,4·-DDE 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:5010234,4·-DDT 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:501080Dieldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 81.7 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 87.0 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 19:50B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 34 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-26 Client Sample ID: LB1-SE2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:008.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:002.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:001.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:005.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:0050NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 66.4 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:00B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 73.5 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:00B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 35 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-27 Client Sample ID: LB1-SW1-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:118.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0NDDieldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:112.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:111.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:115.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:1150NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 68.1 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:11B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 69.7 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:11B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 36 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-28 Client Sample ID: LB1-SW1-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D110ND4,4·-DDD [2C] 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:2110654,4·-DDE 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:2110124,4·-DDT [2C] 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:211078Dieldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 79.0 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 79.0 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:21B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 37 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-29 Client Sample ID: LB1-SW2-0.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D110ND4,4·-DDD 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32101704,4·-DDE 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:3210284,4·-DDT [2C] 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDAldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDalpha-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDalpha-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDbeta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D142NDChlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDdelta-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:3210160Dieldrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDEndosulfan I 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D110NDEndosulfan II 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D110NDEndosulfan sulfate 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D110NDEndrin 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D110NDEndrin aldehyde 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D110NDEndrin ketone 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDgamma-BHC 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDgamma-Chlordane 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDHeptachlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D15.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D125NDMethoxychlor 5 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32 D1250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 43.8 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 62.0 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:32B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 38 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Lab ID: 1903209-30 Client Sample ID: LB1-SW2-2.5 Notes Date/Time AnalyzedPreparedBatchDilutionAnalyte Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 Analyst: BL Result (ug/kg)(ug/kg) PQL 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0ND4,4·-DDD 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0ND4,4·-DDE 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0ND4,4·-DDT 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDAldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDalpha-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDalpha-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDbeta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:428.5NDChlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDdelta-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.03.8Dieldrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDEndosulfan I 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0NDEndosulfan II 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0NDEndosulfan sulfate 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0NDEndrin 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0NDEndrin aldehyde 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:422.0NDEndrin ketone 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDgamma-BHC 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDgamma-Chlordane 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDHeptachlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:421.0NDHeptachlor epoxide 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:425.0NDMethoxychlor 1 B9H0753 08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:4250NDToxaphene Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 69.6 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:42B9H075332 - 91 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 70.7 %08/30/2019 08/30/19 20:42B9H075338 - 93 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 39 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis QUALITY CONTROL SECTION Total Metals by ICP-AES EPA 6010B - Quality Control Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(mg/kg)(mg/kg)Notes MDL (mg/kg) Batch B9H0741 - EPA 3050B_S Blank (B9H0741-BLK1)Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 ND 1.0Arsenic 0.12 LCS (B9H0741-BS1)Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 45.2976 1.0 50.0000 90.6 80 - 120Arsenic0.12 Matrix Spike (B9H0741-MS1)Source: 1903202-04 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 114.490 1.0 125.000 27.3958 69.7 46 - 97Arsenic0.12 Matrix Spike Dup (B9H0741-MSD1)Source: 1903202-04 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 113.330 1.0 125.000 27.3958 68.7 46 - 97 1.02 20Arsenic0.12 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 40 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0753 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S Blank (B9H0753-BLK1)Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 ND 2.04,4·-DDD 0.07 ND 2.04,4·-DDD [2C]0.07 ND 2.04,4·-DDE 0.11 ND 2.04,4·-DDE [2C]0.11 ND 2.04,4·-DDT 0.10 ND 2.04,4·-DDT [2C]0.10 ND 1.0Aldrin 0.12 ND 1.0Aldrin [2C]0.12 ND 1.0alpha-BHC 0.11 ND 1.0alpha-BHC [2C]0.11 ND 1.0alpha-Chlordane 0.12 ND 1.0alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.12 ND 1.0beta-BHC 0.06 ND 1.0beta-BHC [2C]0.06 ND 8.5Chlordane 1.1 ND 8.5Chlordane [2C]1.1 ND 1.0delta-BHC 0.12 ND 1.0delta-BHC [2C]0.12 ND 2.0Dieldrin 0.26 ND 2.0Dieldrin [2C]0.26 ND 1.0Endosulfan I 0.10 ND 1.0Endosulfan I [2C]0.10 ND 2.0Endosulfan II 0.15 ND 2.0Endosulfan II [2C]0.15 ND 2.0Endosulfan sulfate 0.16 ND 2.0Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.16 ND 2.0Endrin 0.14 ND 2.0Endrin [2C]0.14 ND 2.0Endrin aldehyde 0.31 ND 2.0Endrin aldehyde [2C]0.31 ND 2.0Endrin ketone 0.13 ND 2.0Endrin ketone [2C]0.13 ND 1.0gamma-BHC 0.10 ND 1.0gamma-BHC [2C]0.10 ND 1.0gamma-Chlordane 0.89 ND 1.0gamma-Chlordane [2C]0.89 ND 1.0Heptachlor 0.12 ND 1.0Heptachlor [2C]0.12 ND 1.0Heptachlor epoxide 0.09 ND 1.0Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.09 ND 5.0Methoxychlor 0.18 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 41 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0753 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) Blank (B9H0753-BLK1) - Continued Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 ND 5.0Methoxychlor [2C]0.18 ND 50Toxaphene 4.7 ND 50Toxaphene [2C]4.7 13.34 16.6667 80.0 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 13.98 16.6667 83.9 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [ 11.74 16.6667 70.4 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 11.83 16.6667 71.0 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene LCS (B9H0753-BS1)Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 14.1282 2.0 16.6667 84.8 66 - 1124,4·-DDD 0.07 13.3010 2.0 16.6667 79.8 66 - 1124,4·-DDD [2C]0.07 13.9623 2.0 16.6667 83.8 62 - 1124,4·-DDE 0.11 13.1290 2.0 16.6667 78.8 62 - 1124,4·-DDE [2C]0.11 13.2297 2.0 16.6667 79.4 48 - 904,4·-DDT 0.10 12.3988 2.0 16.6667 74.4 48 - 904,4·-DDT [2C]0.10 13.1092 1.0 16.6667 78.7 58 - 104Aldrin0.12 12.3412 1.0 16.6667 74.0 58 - 104Aldrin [2C]0.12 12.8460 1.0 16.6667 77.1 57 - 105alpha-BHC 0.11 12.3663 1.0 16.6667 74.2 57 - 105alpha-BHC [2C]0.11 12.4018 1.0 16.6667 74.4 62 - 108alpha-Chlordane 0.12 12.5465 1.0 16.6667 75.3 62 - 108alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.12 13.0945 1.0 16.6667 78.6 59 - 106beta-BHC 0.06 12.5100 1.0 16.6667 75.1 59 - 106beta-BHC [2C]0.06 12.6673 1.0 16.6667 76.0 63 - 115delta-BHC 0.12 12.0468 1.0 16.6667 72.3 63 - 115delta-BHC [2C]0.12 12.6760 2.0 16.6667 76.1 59 - 102Dieldrin0.26 12.5780 2.0 16.6667 75.5 59 - 102Dieldrin [2C]0.26 10.6377 1.0 16.6667 63.8 61 - 99Endosulfan I 0.10 11.0252 1.0 16.6667 66.2 61 - 99Endosulfan I [2C]0.10 13.1492 2.0 16.6667 78.9 65 - 105Endosulfan II 0.15 12.8458 2.0 16.6667 77.1 65 - 105Endosulfan II [2C]0.15 12.3345 2.0 16.6667 74.0 59 - 107Endosulfan sulfate 0.16 12.3187 2.0 16.6667 73.9 59 - 107Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.16 13.8432 2.0 16.6667 83.1 65 - 113Endrin0.14 13.6380 2.0 16.6667 81.8 65 - 113Endrin [2C]0.14 13.0580 2.0 16.6667 78.3 61 - 109Endrin aldehyde 0.31 12.9907 2.0 16.6667 77.9 61 - 109Endrin aldehyde [2C]0.31 12.7762 2.0 16.6667 76.7 56 - 97Endrin ketone 0.13 12.7795 2.0 16.6667 76.7 56 - 97Endrin ketone [2C]0.13 13.5025 1.0 16.6667 81.0 57 - 101gamma-BHC 0.10 12.8470 1.0 16.6667 77.1 57 - 101gamma-BHC [2C]0.10 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 42 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0753 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) LCS (B9H0753-BS1) - Continued Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 13.3342 1.0 16.6667 80.0 56 - 125gamma-Chlordane 0.89 12.3627 1.0 16.6667 74.2 56 - 125gamma-Chlordane [2C]0.89 13.4952 1.0 16.6667 81.0 61 - 105Heptachlor0.12 12.3568 1.0 16.6667 74.1 61 - 105Heptachlor [2C]0.12 12.6338 1.0 16.6667 75.8 59 - 97Heptachlor epoxide 0.09 11.7360 1.0 16.6667 70.4 59 - 97Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.09 12.8362 5.0 16.6667 77.0 68 - 118Methoxychlor0.18 12.6437 5.0 16.6667 75.9 68 - 118Methoxychlor [2C]0.18 15.06 16.6667 90.4 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 14.94 16.6667 89.7 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [ 13.54 16.6667 81.3 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 13.31 16.6667 79.8 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene Duplicate (B9H0753-DUP1)Source: 1903191-15 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 12.2692 10 ND NR 204,4·-DDD 0.35 10.9950 10 ND NR 204,4·-DDD [2C]0.35 23.2825 10 23.3683 0.368 204,4·-DDE 0.54 22.8792 10 22.9600 0.353 204,4·-DDE [2C]0.54 34.6208 10 33.2183 4.13 204,4·-DDT 0.50 18.9383 10 21.0908 10.8 204,4·-DDT [2C]0.50 ND 5.0 ND 20Aldrin0.62 ND 5.0 ND 20Aldrin [2C]0.62 ND 5.0 ND 20alpha-BHC 0.53 ND 5.0 ND 20alpha-BHC [2C]0.53 2.95417 5.0 2.96750 0.450 20alpha-Chlordane 0.59 5.05500 5.0 5.10417 0.968 20alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.59 0.318333 5.0 0.414167 26.2 20 Rbeta-BHC 0.30 0.392500 5.0 0.451667 14.0 20beta-BHC [2C]0.30 ND 5.0 ND 20delta-BHC 0.62 ND 5.0 ND 20delta-BHC [2C]0.62 ND 10 ND 20Dieldrin1.3 ND 10 ND 20Dieldrin [2C]1.3 ND 5.0 ND 20Endosulfan I 0.50 ND 5.0 ND 20Endosulfan I [2C]0.50 ND 10 ND 20Endosulfan II 0.77 ND 10 ND 20Endosulfan II [2C]0.77 ND 10 ND 20Endosulfan sulfate 0.80 ND 10 ND 20Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.80 ND 10 ND 20Endrin0.68 ND 10 ND 20Endrin [2C]0.68 ND 10 ND 20Endrin aldehyde 1.6 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 43 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0753 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) Duplicate (B9H0753-DUP1) - Continued Source: 1903191-15 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 ND 10 ND 20Endrin aldehyde [2C]1.6 ND 10 ND 20Endrin ketone 0.63 ND 10 ND 20Endrin ketone [2C]0.63 ND 5.0 ND 20gamma-BHC 0.52 ND 5.0 ND 20gamma-BHC [2C]0.52 ND 5.0 ND NR 20gamma-Chlordane 4.4 ND 5.0 ND NR 20gamma-Chlordane [2C]4.4 ND 5.0 ND 20Heptachlor0.59 ND 5.0 ND 20Heptachlor [2C]0.59 ND 5.0 ND 20Heptachlor epoxide 0.44 ND 5.0 ND 20Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.44 ND 25 ND 20Methoxychlor0.89 ND 25 ND 20Methoxychlor [2C]0.89 11.45 16.6667 68.7 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 10.68 16.6667 64.1 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [ 13.26 16.6667 79.6 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 12.59 16.6667 75.5 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene Matrix Spike (B9H0753-MS1)Source: 1903191-15 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 14.0575 10 16.6667 ND 84.3 33 - 1164,4·-DDD 0.35 15.6283 10 16.6667 ND 93.8 33 - 1164,4·-DDD [2C]0.35 25.7800 10 16.6667 23.3683 14.5 29 - 128 M14,4·-DDE 0.54 24.8233 10 16.6667 22.9600 11.2 29 - 128 M14,4·-DDE [2C]0.54 41.7950 10 16.6667 33.2183 51.5 27 - 1094,4·-DDT 0.50 25.3450 10 16.6667 21.0908 25.5 27 - 109 M14,4·-DDT [2C]0.50 12.4700 5.0 16.6667 ND 74.8 34 - 110Aldrin0.62 12.0275 5.0 16.6667 ND 72.2 34 - 110Aldrin [2C]0.62 13.0158 5.0 16.6667 ND 78.1 39 - 107alpha-BHC 0.53 12.7892 5.0 16.6667 ND 76.7 39 - 107alpha-BHC [2C]0.53 14.3450 5.0 16.6667 2.96750 68.3 37 - 111alpha-Chlordane 0.59 15.6433 5.0 16.6667 5.10417 63.2 37 - 111alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.59 10.9942 5.0 16.6667 0.414167 63.5 33 - 111beta-BHC 0.30 10.6200 5.0 16.6667 0.451667 61.0 33 - 111beta-BHC [2C]0.30 10.4967 5.0 16.6667 ND 63.0 25 - 122delta-BHC 0.62 10.1992 5.0 16.6667 ND 61.2 25 - 122delta-BHC [2C]0.62 17.6250 10 16.6667 ND 106 28 - 114Dieldrin1.3 20.8058 10 16.6667 ND 125 28 - 114 M1Dieldrin [2C]1.3 10.4975 5.0 16.6667 ND 63.0 35 - 107Endosulfan I 0.50 10.4633 5.0 16.6667 ND 62.8 35 - 107Endosulfan I [2C]0.50 13.3383 10 16.6667 ND 80.0 13 - 122Endosulfan II 0.77 11.3158 10 16.6667 ND 67.9 13 - 122Endosulfan II [2C]0.77 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 44 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0753 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) Matrix Spike (B9H0753-MS1) - Continued Source: 1903191-15 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 17.2575 10 16.6667 ND 104 13 - 120Endosulfan sulfate 0.80 9.95667 10 16.6667 ND 59.7 13 - 120Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.80 14.4675 10 16.6667 ND 86.8 31 - 121Endrin0.68 15.3500 10 16.6667 ND 92.1 31 - 121Endrin [2C]0.68 22.4583 10 16.6667 ND 135 18 - 129 M1Endrin aldehyde 1.6 10.9158 10 16.6667 ND 65.5 18 - 129Endrin aldehyde [2C]1.6 12.0983 10 16.6667 ND 72.6 14 - 113Endrin ketone 0.63 12.8133 10 16.6667 ND 76.9 14 - 113Endrin ketone [2C]0.63 14.1392 5.0 16.6667 ND 84.8 34 - 104gamma-BHC 0.52 13.4717 5.0 16.6667 ND 80.8 34 - 104gamma-BHC [2C]0.52 16.5342 5.0 16.6667 ND 99.2 35 - 121gamma-Chlordane 4.4 14.1967 5.0 16.6667 ND 85.2 35 - 121gamma-Chlordane [2C]4.4 13.5433 5.0 16.6667 ND 81.3 35 - 110Heptachlor0.59 12.8200 5.0 16.6667 ND 76.9 35 - 110Heptachlor [2C]0.59 14.8475 5.0 16.6667 ND 89.1 31 - 106Heptachlor epoxide 0.44 11.3267 5.0 16.6667 ND 68.0 31 - 106Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.44 13.7608 25 16.6667 ND 82.6 21 - 128Methoxychlor0.89 14.7942 25 16.6667 ND 88.8 21 - 128Methoxychlor [2C]0.89 13.22 16.6667 79.3 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 12.23 16.6667 73.4 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [ 12.80 16.6667 76.8 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 12.62 16.6667 75.7 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene Matrix Spike Dup (B9H0753-MSD1)Source: 1903191-15 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 11.9742 10 16.6667 ND 71.8 33 - 116 16.0 204,4·-DDD 0.35 15.3358 10 16.6667 ND 92.0 33 - 116 1.89 204,4·-DDD [2C]0.35 25.8458 10 16.6667 23.3683 14.9 29 - 128 0.255 20 M14,4·-DDE 0.54 25.0733 10 16.6667 22.9600 12.7 29 - 128 1.00 20 M14,4·-DDE [2C]0.54 40.8942 10 16.6667 33.2183 46.1 27 - 109 2.18 204,4·-DDT 0.50 23.9417 10 16.6667 21.0908 17.1 27 - 109 5.69 20 M14,4·-DDT [2C]0.50 12.7083 5.0 16.6667 ND 76.2 34 - 110 1.89 20Aldrin0.62 12.3725 5.0 16.6667 ND 74.2 34 - 110 2.83 20Aldrin [2C]0.62 13.5300 5.0 16.6667 ND 81.2 39 - 107 3.87 20alpha-BHC 0.53 13.3825 5.0 16.6667 ND 80.3 39 - 107 4.53 20alpha-BHC [2C]0.53 14.5125 5.0 16.6667 2.96750 69.3 37 - 111 1.16 20alpha-Chlordane 0.59 15.7658 5.0 16.6667 5.10417 64.0 37 - 111 0.780 20alpha-Chlordane [2C]0.59 11.4483 5.0 16.6667 0.414167 66.2 33 - 111 4.05 20beta-BHC 0.30 11.0683 5.0 16.6667 0.451667 63.7 33 - 111 4.13 20beta-BHC [2C]0.30 10.9625 5.0 16.6667 ND 65.8 25 - 122 4.34 20delta-BHC 0.62 10.6125 5.0 16.6667 ND 63.7 25 - 122 3.97 20delta-BHC [2C]0.62 17.6558 10 16.6667 ND 106 28 - 114 0.175 20Dieldrin1.3 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 45 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Analyte Result PQL Spike Level Source Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit(ug/kg)(ug/kg)Notes Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081 - Quality Control (cont’d) MDL (ug/kg) Batch B9H0753 - GCSEMI_PCB/PEST_S (continued) Matrix Spike Dup (B9H0753-MSD1) - Continued Source: 1903191-15 Prepared: 8/30/2019 Analyzed: 8/30/2019 20.5942 10 16.6667 ND 124 28 - 114 1.02 20 M1Dieldrin [2C]1.3 10.8075 5.0 16.6667 ND 64.8 35 - 107 2.91 20Endosulfan I 0.50 10.4933 5.0 16.6667 ND 63.0 35 - 107 0.286 20Endosulfan I [2C]0.50 13.9800 10 16.6667 ND 83.9 13 - 122 4.70 20Endosulfan II 0.77 11.0717 10 16.6667 ND 66.4 13 - 122 2.18 20Endosulfan II [2C]0.77 16.9708 10 16.6667 ND 102 13 - 120 1.68 20Endosulfan sulfate 0.80 9.42417 10 16.6667 ND 56.5 13 - 120 5.50 20Endosulfan Sulfate [2C]0.80 14.3383 10 16.6667 ND 86.0 31 - 121 0.897 20Endrin0.68 14.2683 10 16.6667 ND 85.6 31 - 121 7.30 20Endrin [2C]0.68 21.9600 10 16.6667 ND 132 18 - 129 2.24 20 M1Endrin aldehyde 1.6 11.4425 10 16.6667 ND 68.7 18 - 129 4.71 20Endrin aldehyde [2C]1.6 10.2067 10 16.6667 ND 61.2 14 - 113 17.0 20Endrin ketone 0.63 12.3967 10 16.6667 ND 74.4 14 - 113 3.31 20Endrin ketone [2C]0.63 14.7300 5.0 16.6667 ND 88.4 34 - 104 4.09 20gamma-BHC 0.52 14.0842 5.0 16.6667 ND 84.5 34 - 104 4.45 20gamma-BHC [2C]0.52 16.8317 5.0 16.6667 ND 101 35 - 121 1.78 20gamma-Chlordane 4.4 14.3342 5.0 16.6667 ND 86.0 35 - 121 0.964 20gamma-Chlordane [2C]4.4 14.1358 5.0 16.6667 ND 84.8 35 - 110 4.28 20Heptachlor0.59 13.1992 5.0 16.6667 ND 79.2 35 - 110 2.91 20Heptachlor [2C]0.59 15.1000 5.0 16.6667 ND 90.6 31 - 106 1.69 20Heptachlor epoxide 0.44 11.5000 5.0 16.6667 ND 69.0 31 - 106 1.52 20Heptachlor epoxide [2C]0.44 13.6558 25 16.6667 ND 81.9 21 - 128 0.766 20Methoxychlor0.89 14.1950 25 16.6667 ND 85.2 21 - 128 4.13 20Methoxychlor [2C]0.89 12.68 16.6667 76.0 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 12.28 16.6667 73.7 32 - 91Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [ 13.22 16.6667 79.3 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 13.09 16.6667 78.5 38 - 93Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 46 of 50 17781 Cowan Street Irvine , CA 92614 Project Number : Report To : Park Plaza, 12137.003 Brynn McCulloch Reported :09/03/2019 Leighton Consulting, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Notes and Definitions R RPD value outside acceptance criteria. Calculation is based on raw values. M1 Matrix spike recovery outside of acceptance limit. The analytical batch was validated by the laboratory control sample. D1 Sample required dilution due to possible matrix interference. ND Analyte is not detected at or above the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL). When client requests quantitation against MDL, analyte is not detected at or above the Method Detection Limit (MDL) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit MDL Method Detection Limit RPD Relative Percent Difference Not ReportedNR CA2 CA-ELAP (CDPH) OR-NELAP (OSPHL)OR1 Notes: (1) The reported MDL and PQL are based on prep ratio variation and analytical dilution. (2) The suffix [2C] of specific analytes signifies that the reported result is taken from the instrument’s second column. (3) Results are wet unless otherwise specified. 3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562-989-4045 Fax: 562-989-4040 www.atlglobal.com Page 47 of 50 Page 48 of 50 Page 49 of 50 Page 50 of 50 APPENDIX D PROUCL OUTPUT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 A B C D E F G H I J K L Assuming Gamma Distribution 95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50)) 10.68 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 10.79 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0413 Adjusted Chi Square Value 146.8 MLE Mean (bias corrected) 8.89 MLE Sd (bias corrected) 5.245 Approximate Chi Square Value (0.05) 148.3 Theta hat (MLE) 2.816 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 3.094 nu hat (MLE) 195.8 nu star (bias corrected) 178.1 Gamma Statistics k hat (MLE) 3.157 k star (bias corrected MLE) 2.873 5% K-S Critical Value 0.159 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 5% A-D Critical Value 0.752 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level K-S Test Statistic 0.222 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Gamma GOF Test Gamma GOF Test A-D Test Statistic 1.067 Anderson-Darling Gamma GOF Test 95% Student's-t UCL 10.46 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 10.54 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 10.48 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level Assuming Normal Distribution 95% Normal UCL 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.249 Lilliefors GOF Test 5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.156 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level Normal GOF Test Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.872 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test 5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.929 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level Coefficient of Variation 0.578 Skewness 0.722 Maximum 19 Median 5.7 SD 5.143 Std. Error of Mean 0.924 Number of Missing Observations 0 Minimum 1.9 Mean 8.89 General Statistics Total Number of Observations 31 Number of Distinct Observations 23 Number of Bootstrap Operations 2000 Arsenic From File Arsenic UCL Input_a.xls Full Precision OFF Confidence Coefficient 95% UCL Statistics for Data Sets with Non-Detects User Selected Options Date/Time of Computation ProUCL 5.19/6/2019 1:38:31 PM 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 A B C D E F G H I J K L ProUCL computes and outputs H-statistic based UCLs for historical reasons only. H-statistic often results in unstable (both high and low) values of UCL95 as shown in examples in the Technical Guide. It is therefore recommended to avoid the use of H-statistic based 95% UCLs. Use of nonparametric methods are preferred to compute UCL95 for skewed data sets which do not follow a gamma distribution. Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL. Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness. These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006). However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician. Suggested UCL to Use 95% H-UCL 11.22 90% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 11.66 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 12.92 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 14.66 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 18.08 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 10.57 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 10.39 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 10.42 95% CLT UCL 10.41 95% Jackknife UCL 10.46 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 10.36 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 10.63 Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level Nonparametric Distribution Free UCLs 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 13.41 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 15.34 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 19.13 Assuming Lognormal Distribution 95% H-UCL 11.22 90% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 12.02 Maximum of Logged Data 2.944 SD of logged Data 0.599 Lognormal Statistics Minimum of Logged Data 0.642 Mean of logged Data 2.018 5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.156 Data Not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Approximate Lognormal at 5% Significance Level 5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.929 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.195 Lilliefors Lognormal GOF Test Lognormal GOF Test Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.93 Shapiro Wilk Lognormal GOF Test APPENDIX G • Preliminary WQMP PRELIMINARY PRIORITY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (WQMP) For: Park Plaza Expansion 574 South Glassell Street Orange, CA 92866 Parcel Map 101-29 / Tract No. 10803 / Parcel 1 Prepared for: KC Orange II, L.P. 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 804-5900 Prepared by: Pasco Laret Suiter & Associates, Inc. William J. Suiter, P.E. RCE 68964 27127 Calle Arroyo, Suite 1904 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 (949) 661-6695 February 2019 Revised: May 2019 ___________________________________ _________________________ Public Works Director Date __________________________ _____________________ City Engineer Date OWNER’S CERTIFICATION WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PARK PLAZA EXPANSION This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the Park Plaza Expansion has been prepared for KC Orange II, L.P. This WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Orange’s [Minor Site Plan # 0963-18) requiring the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the City of Orange Local Implementation Plan (LIP), and the intent of NPDES Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for the City of Orange, County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. This WQMP will be reviewed with the facility operator, facility supervisors, employees, tenants, maintenance and service contractors, or any other party having responsibility for implementing portions of this WQMP. Maintenance requirements within Section V and Appendix D will be adhered to with particular emphasis on maintaining the BMPs described within Sections IV and V. The Owner’s Annual Self Certification Statement along with a BMP maintenance implementation table will be submitted by June 30th every year following project completion. At least one copy of the approved WQMP shall be available on the subject property in perpetuity. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors-in-interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. The City of Orange will be notified of the change of ownership and the new owner will submit a new certification. Signature: ____________________________ Date: Name: Axel Guerra Title: Acquisition and Development Manager Company: KC Orange II LP Address: 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephone Number: 760-804-7065 Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) WQMP Number – As assigned by the City of Orange: Submission of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility constitutes notice to the City that responsibility for the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the subject property identified below, and implementation of that plan, is being transferred from the Previous Owner (and his/her agent) of the site (or portion thereof) to the New Owner, as further described below. I. Owner/ Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual: KC Orange II LP Contact Person: Axel Guerra Title: Acquisition and Development Manager Street Address: 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300, Carlsbad, CA 92008 City Carlsbad State CA Zip 92008 Phone: 760-804-7065 II. Information about Site Relevant to WQMP Name of Project: Park Plaza Expansion Title of WQMP applicable to site: Kisco Senior Living – Park Plaza Expansion Street Address of the site: 574 South Glassell Street, Orange, CA 92866 Date of Transfer of Responsibility: III. New Owner (Upon Transfer)/ Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual: Contact Person: Street Address: Title: City State Zip Phone: WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 i Table of Contents I. Discretionary Permit Number(s), Water Quality Condition Number(s) and Conditions………………………………………………………………….. 1 II. Project Description………………………………………………………… 2 III. Site Description……………………………………………………………. 4 IV. Best Management Practices……………………………………………… 6 IV.1 Site Design BMPs…………………………………………………. 6 IV.2 Source Control BMPs……………………………………………… 7 IV.3 Low Impact Development BMP Selection………………………. 11 IV.6 Vector Control……………………………………………………… 15 IV.7 Drainage Management Areas……………………………………. 15 IV.8 Calculations………………………………………………………… 16 V. Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Responsibility for BMPs (O&M Plan)……………………………………..…………………… 17 VI. Location Map, Site Plan, and BMP Details………………….…………… 24 VII. Educational Materials………………………………………………………. 25 Appendices A. Conditions of Approval, Resolution Number ______ dated _______ B. Educational Material C. BMP Details D. BMP Maintenance Information E. Geotechnical Infiltration Testing (for reference only) F. Hydrology Information (Q2 – Two-year frequency storm evaluation) List of Tables Table 1 Site Design BMPs…………………………………………... 6 Table 2 Routine Non-Structural BMPs……………………………… 7 Table 3 Routine Structural BMPs…………………………………… 9 Table 4 Hydrologic Source Control BMPs…………………………. 11 Table 5 Infiltration BMPs…………….. ……………………………… 12 Table 6 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting……………….. 13 Table 7 Biotreatment BMPs………………………………………….. 14 Table 8 Frequency Inspection Matrix…………………………..……. 17 WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 1 I. Discretionary Permit Number(s), Water Quality Condition Number(s) and Conditions of Approval Tract No. 10803 Lot No. 19 GPS Coordinates: 33.7800443 -117.853015 Water Quality Conditions (WQMP conditions listed below) Once issued, a complete copy of the signed Conditions of Approval, Resolution Number _________ dated _________ will be included as Appendix A Conditions of Approval: To be provided in the Final WQMP upon issuance by the City of Orange. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 2 II. Project Description Planning Area (Location): Historic District and adjacent Planning Areas Project Site Area (ac): 0.848 Project Disturbed Area (ac): 0.848 Percent Change in Impermeable Surfaces: - 5.8% SIC Code: 5812 Project Description The project proposes to construct a 36-unit assisted senior living center consisting of a 2-story building, a driveway on the east edge of the site for main entry and fire truck access, an existing gate entrance at the southwest corner of the site for shared access to the existing senior living center to the south, private drives, parking stalls, associated utilities, a courtyard, associated hardscape and landscape improvements throughout the project site. The project will consist of approximately 32,100 s.f. of building footprint, 8,650 s.f. of drive aisle, 3,200 s.f. of parking stalls, 3,950 s.f. of sidewalks, and 4,725 s.f. of landscaping. Project Purpose and Activities The purpose of the project is to redevelop the existing site from a restaurant building and parking lot into a senior assisted living community. The redevelopment will serve as an expansion to the existing senior assisted living community to the south of the project site. Proposed sidewalks, drive aisles and common spaces will ensure a unified integration with the existing senior community and an overall improved experience for current and future residents. Potential Storm Water Pollutants Expected pollutants include suspended-solid/sediment, nutrients, heavy metals, pathogens (bacteria/virus), pesticides, oil and grease, toxic organic compounds, and trash and debris. Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Runoff from the project discharges to Santiago Creek Channel which flows to the Santa Ana River which discharges to the Pacific Ocean. At the location where the project discharges to the Santiago Creek Channel and confluences with the Santa Ana River, both channels are stabilized per Appendix XVI.3 Figure 3 of the TGD. However, Figure 3 shows the project is located within an area of potential erosion, habitat and physical structure susceptibility, therefore the hydrologic conditions or concern were analyzed. Refer to the summary table below and Appendix F for calculations. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 3 2-YEAR STORM EVENT INFORMATION Volume (ac-ft) Velocity (ft/s) Time of Concentration (min) Pre-Development 0.11 7.94 Post-Development 0.09 8.37 Post Development Drainage Characteristics In the proposed condition, storm water runoff from the majority of the project site will be collected in a proposed cross gutter and conveyed to a storm water BMP facility consisting of a Modular Wetland System pretreatment unit and underground perforated storage infiltration tank located in the western portion of the site. Runoff from the courtyard area along the south side of the building will be collected and conveyed in proposed storm drain to the same BMP facility. The BMP facility will provide water quality treatment and retention via infiltration for the project DCV. In larger storm events, overflow will discharge from the pretreatment unit via a secondary storm drain which will convey overflow to a pop-up drain emitter located on the neighboring property. W hen pressurized, the pop-up drain will allow overflow to drain out and sheet flow southerly as it does in the existing condition. A small planter area along the southeastern boundary will not drain to the BMP facility. Instead, the small planter area is considered “self-treating” and will drain easterly to Glassell Street. Commercial Projects The proposed project includes a kitchen, two dining areas, housekeeping storage room, and maintenance storage room all of which are indoors and not exposed to storm water. There is an outdoor trash area proposed which will be designed to preclude precipitation. The project will install a gravity grease interceptor in order to remove fats, oils and grease (FOG) from the building’s kitchen waste before entering the sewer system. Site Ownership and any Easements The property is owned by KC Orange II, L.P. No infrastructure will be transferred to public agencies. A homeowner’s association (HOA) will be formed and will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the project’s storm water BMPs. In the event of a change in ownership, a “Notice of Transfer of Responsibility” form shall be filed with the City of Orange Public Works Department. A copy of the form is included in the front of this report. 1.16 1.13 WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 4 III. Site Description Reference Location Map: Page 799, Grid G5 Site Address: 574 South Glassell Street, Orange, CA 92866 Zoning: Limited Business (C-1) Predominant Soil type: A Pre-project percent pervious: 8 Post-project percent pervious: 14 Pre-project percent impervious: 92 Post-project percent impervious: 86 Site Characteristics The existing site is currently developed and has a restaurant building with a parking lot. In the existing conditions, the site is very flat with an approximate average slope of 1.0%. According to a geotechnical study performed by Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc in April 2016, soils consisted of artificial fill of approximately 4-5 feet and consisted of silty sand/sandy silt that was damp to moist and loose/very soft to soft. Below the artificial fill was alluvium that typically consisted of both fine and coarse-grained soils. The fine- grain soils generally consisted of brown, olive brown and red brown sandy silt and were damp to moist and ranged from very soft to stiff. The coarse-grained deposits consisted of various shades of brown silty sand, silty sand with gravel, gravel with sand and silt, and sand with gravel. These deposits were dry to moist and ranged from very loose to very dense. Groundwater was not encountered during subsurface exploration to a maximum of 51.5 feet bgs. According to the study, the historical high groundwater level for the general area in which the project resides is approximately 45 feet or more below the existing ground surface. An additional geotechnical study was performed by Leighton Consulting, Inc. to test the percolation rates at the proposed infiltration location. Two boring holes were drilled on April 18, 2019 at the proposed infiltration tank location. Testing was performed in accordance with the Orange County TGD. Based on the results of percolation testing, the design infiltration rate at the proposed infiltration location is 3.2 inches per hour which includes a safety factor of 2. Glassell Street, on the east side of the project site, has several existing utility lines and mains that the existing restaurant building utilizes for its sewer, water, electrical, and gas services. Although the existing project site does not drain into it, there is an existing WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 5 66” RCP storm drainage pipe on the east half of Glassell Street that drains southerly towards the Santiago Creek. Watershed Characteristics Watershed: Santa Ana River Downstream Receiving Waters: Santiago Creek, Reach 2, Reach 1 of Lower Santa Ana River, Pacific Ocean Water Quality Impairments (if applicable): Reach 2 was 303d listed per indicator bacteria in 2010 and was subsequently de-listed in 2016. Identify hydromodification susceptibility: Runoff from the project discharges to Santiago Creek which flows to the Santa Ana River which discharges to the Pacific Ocean. At the location where the project discharges to Santiago Creek and confluences with the Santa Ana River, both channels are stabilized per Appendix XVI.3 Figure 3 of the TGD. However, Figure 3 shows the project is located within an area of potential erosion, habitat and physical structure susceptibility, therefore the hydrologic conditions or concern were analyzed. (See Section II, 2-Year Storm Event Information table) Identify watershed management priorities: Not applicable. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 6 IV. Best Management Practices IV.1 Site Design and Drainage Characteristics Table 1 Site Design BMPs Technique Included? If no, state justification. Yes No Minimize Directly Connected Impervious Areas (DCIAs) (C-Factor Reduction) Create Reduced or “Zero Discharge” Areas (Runoff Volume Reduction)1 Runoff will drain to a proposed drywell for water quality treatment and retention through infiltration. Minimize Impervious Area/Maximize Permeability (C-Factor Reduction)2 Conserve Natural Areas (C-Factor Reduction) No natural areas to protect exist on the project site 1 Detention and retention areas incorporated into landscape design provide areas for retaining and detaining stormwater flows, resulting in lower runoff rates and reductions in volume due to limited infiltration and evaporation. Such Site Design BMPs may reduce the size of Treatment Control BMPs. 2 The “C Factor” is a representation of the ability of a surface to produce runoff. Surfaces that produce higher volumes of runoff are represented by higher C Factors. By incorporating more pervious, lower C Factor surfaces into a development, lower volumes of runoff will be produced. Lower volumes and rates of runoff translate directly to lowering treatment requirements. Minimize Directly Connected Impervious Areas The project site proposes landscaped areas adjacent to the proposed building, sidewalks, curbs and gutters to ensure vegetated buffers between impervious areas. This will allow the opportunity for infiltration into the soil to occur within areas throughout the site not just one isolated location. Minimize Impervious Area/ Maximize Permeability In the proposed condition the impervious area will be reduced from the existing condition. Several landscaped areas are located throughout the site including areas adjacent to the proposed building, sidewalks, curb and gutters. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 7 IV.2 Source Control BMPs IV.2.1 Routine Non-Structural BMPs Table 2 Routine Non-Structural BMPs BMP No. Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason. Included Not Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants X N2 Activity Restriction X N3 Common Area Landscape Management X N4 BMP Maintenance X N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance X No hazardous waste on site N6 Local Water Quality Permit Compliance X Not applicable. The City of Orange does not issue water quality permits. N7 Spill Contingency Plan X No hazardous waste on site N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance X No underground storage on site N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance X No hazardous waste or materials on site N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation X Not applicable. Not an industrial development. N11 Common Area Litter Control X N12 Employee Training X N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks X No loading docks on site N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection X N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots X N1 – Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Educational materials such as brochures and information on how to reduce pollutants from reaching the storm drain system shall be distributed to owners, tenants and occupants. Refer to Section VII for a list of materials available. N2 – Activity Restrictions The property owner shall develop restrictions on activities that have the potential to create adverse impacts on water quality. Activities include but are not limited to: use of pesticides and fertilizers consistent with City and County guidelines, prohibiting washing WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 8 of walkways and driveways, prohibiting vehicle maintenance activities, and prohibiting vehicle washings. N3 – Common Area Landscape Management Landscape management including but not limited to water-efficient irrigation systems and proper disposal of waste shall be consistent with City requirements, and fertilizer/pesticide use shall be consistent with County Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers (OC DAMP Section 5.5) and City of Orange LIP. N4 – BMP Maintenance Maintenance of BMPs shall be performed at the frequency prescribed in this W QMP. Records of inspections and maintenance shall be maintained by the owner and be available for review upon request. N11 – Common Area Litter Control Litter control activities such as visual inspections, performing trash pickup and sweeping, and proper disposal shall be performed at a minimum of weekly or more often, as needed. N12 – Employee Training Training of all employees and any contractors shall be performed to ensure maintenance activities will not impact water quality. Training shall include at a minimum: spill cleanup procedures, proper waste disposal, proper housekeeping practices, etc. N14 – Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Catch basin inlets shall be inspected and cleaned prior to the start of the rainy season, by October 1st each year. N15 – Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Parking areas and private drive aisles must be swept at a minimum of every two weeks (weekly preferred) or more often if trash and debris is present, including prior to the start of the rainy season, by October 1st each year. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 9 IV.2.2 Routine Structural BMPs Table 3 Routine Structural BMPs Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage- “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean” X Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction X No outdoor material storage areas on site Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction X Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design X Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation X No slopes or channels on site Incorporate requirements applicable to individual project features a. Dock areas X No loading docks on site b. Maintenance bays X No maintenance bays on site c. Vehicle or community wash areas X No vehicle wash areas on site d. Outdoor processing areas X No outdoor processing areas on site e. Equipment wash areas X No equipment wash areas on site f. Fueling areas X No fueling areas on site g. Hillside landscaping X No hillside areas on site h. Wash water control for food preparation areas X Provide storm drain stenciling Storm drain inlets shall be stenciled to read “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean”. Stenciling shall be annually inspected and re-stenciled for legibility. Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction Trash and waste storage areas shall be designed to prevent direct contact with precipitation and collection of storm water within the areas. Any storm water retained within the area shall not be discharged to the street or storm drain system. Use efficient irrigation systems and landscape design Irrigation systems and landscape shall be designed to eliminate overspray and excess runoff. Watering timing and cycle lengths shall be adjusted in accordance with water demands, time of year, weather, and temperatures. The landscape areas shall be slightly recessed (approximately 1”) from adjacent finished surface. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 10 Wash water control for food preparation areas Food preparation areas shall be designed to meet all applicable health and safety regulations including installation of a gravity grease interceptor meeting the UPC requirements. Areas shall be designed to properly contain and discharge wash water to the sanitary sewer. All drains near the grease generating equipment areas, the three- compartment sink, janitorial sink, etc. shall drain to the gravity grease interceptor designed to meet all applicable plumbing design standards. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 11 IV.3 Low Impact Development BMP Selection IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls Table 4 Hydrologic Source Control BMPs Name Check If Used Localized on-lot infiltration Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) Green roofs/Brown roofs Blue roofs Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: There is a planter area proposed along the southeastern project boundary comprised mainly of landscape with a minor amount of impervious area. Per Worksheet A and HSC-2 Fact Sheet, 80% capture efficiency is achieved. Refer to the calculations provided in Section IV.8. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 12 IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Table 5 Infiltration BMPs Name Check If Used Bioretention without underdrains Rain gardens Porous landscaping Infiltration planters Retention swales Infiltration trenches Infiltration basins Drywells Subsurface infiltration galleries French drains Permeable asphalt Permeable concrete Permeable concrete pavers Other: Other: The full LID Design Storm Capture Volume will be met with the use of a storm water BMP facility consisting of a Modular Wetland System pretreatment unit and underground perforated storage infiltration tank. Storm water runoff will flow to the Modular Wetland System for pretreatment and continue to the underground perforated storage tank for infiltration. Refer to the calculations provided in Section IV.8. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 13 IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs Table 6 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMP Name Check If Used All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 Surface-based infiltration BMPs Biotreatment BMPs Above-ground cisterns and basins Underground detention Other: Other: Other: The full LID Design Storm Capture Volume will be met with an infiltration BMP, therefore evapotranspiration and rainwater harvesting BMPs are not proposed for the project. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 14 IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs Table 7 Biotreatment BMPs Bioretention with underdrains Storm water planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains Constructed wetlands Vegetated swales Vegetated filter strips Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems Wet extended detention basin Dry extended detention basins Other: Other: The full LID Design Storm Capture Volume will be met with an infiltration BMP, however a Modular Wetland System is proposed as pretreatment for the infiltration tank. Refer to the calculations provided in Section IV.8. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 15 IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Not applicable. See discussion in Sections II & III. IV.3.6 Treatment Control BMPs Not applicable. IV.6 Vector Control All BMPs will be designed to allow for full drawdown of storm water within 96 hours preventing mosquito breeding habitat. IV.7 Drainage Management Area (DMA) DMA Number BMPs Area Treated 1 Pre-treatment (Mod. Wet.) INF-5 (Perforated storage tank) 0.802 ac 2 HSC-2 (Self-treating) 0.046 ac 3 4 5 6 Total Area 0.848 ac Total Project Area= 0.848 ac (Note if all project design storm volume is captured by these BMPs). WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 16 IV.8 Calculations TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches)d=0.8 0.8 inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, d HSC (inches) (Worksheet A)dHSC=0 0 inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, d remainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= 0.8 0.8 inches 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres)A=0.802 0.046 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless)imp=0.896 0.210 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C=0.8220 0.3075 4 Calculate runoff volume, V design = (C x d remainder x A x 43560 x (1/12))Vdesign=1914 41 cu-ft 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, K 1 (in/hr) observed Appendix VII Kobserved=3.2 3.2 In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, S total (unitless) Stotal=3.5 3.5 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, K design = K observed / S total Kdesign=0.91 0.91 In/hr 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours)T=Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), D max = K design x T x (1/12) Dmax=feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), A min = V design / d max Amin=sq-ft by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kobserved. See Appendix VII. Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume Step 2: Calculate the DCV Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate NA Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint NA 1Kobserved is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted HSC used. Refer to Worksheet A in Section IV.8 Refer to Worksheets B and C in Section IV.8 Worksheet C: Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches)d=0.8 inches 2 Enter calculated drawdown time of the proposed BMP based on equation provided in applicable BMP Fact Sheet, T (hours) T=48 hours 3 Using Figure III.2, determine the "fraction of design capture storm depth" at which the BMP drawdown time (T) line achieves 80% capture efficiency, X 1 X1=1.05 4 Enter the effective depth of provided HSCs upstream, d HSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= 0 inches 5 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y 2 (Worksheet A) Y2= 0 % 6 Using Figure III.2, determine the fraction of “design capture storm depth” at which the drawdown time (T) achieves the equivalent of the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), X 2 X2= 0 7 Calculate the fraction of design volume that must be provided by BMP, fraction = X 1 – X 2 fraction= 1.05 8 Calculate the resultant design capture storm depth (inches), d fraction = fraction × d dfraction= 0.84 inches 9 SOC Only: When using this method for biofiltration sizing, check that the resulting volume in pre-filter detention volume plus pore spaces is at least 0.75 of the remaining DCV (See Section III.7 and Worksheet SOC-1).Y / N / NA 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres)A=0.802 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless)imp=0.896 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C=0.8220 4 Calculate runoff volume, V design = (C x d rfraction x A x 43560 x (1/12))Vdesign= 2010 cu-ft Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume Step 2: Calculate the DCV Supporting Calculations Describe system: Refer to the calculations in Section IV.8. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches)d=0.84 inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, d HSC (inches) (Worksheet A)dHSC= 0 inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, d remainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= 0.84 inches 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres)A=0.802 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless)imp=0.896 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C=0.8220 4 Calculate runoff volume, V design = (C x d remainder x A x 43560 x (1/12))Vdesign= 2010 cu-ft 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, K observed 1 (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kobserved= 3.2 In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, S total (unitless) Stotal= 3.5 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, K design = K observed / S total Kdesign=0.91 In/hr 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours)T=48 Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), D max = K design x T x (1/12) Dmax= 3.64 feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), A min = V design / d max Amin= 552 sq-ft Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume Step 2: Calculate the DCV Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 1 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk for groundwater related concerns? Refer to Appendix VII (Worksheet I) for guidance on groundwater-related infiltration feasibility criteria. X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 2 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk of increasing risk of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level? (Yes if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert): The BMP can only be located less than 50 feet away from slopes steeper than 15 percent The BMP can only be located less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback. A study prepared by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study substantiates that stormwater infiltration would potentially result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level. X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 3 Would infiltration of the DCV from drainage area violate downstream water rights? X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Partial Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 4 Is proposed infiltration facility located on HSG D soils or the site geotechnical investigation identifies presence of soil characteristics which support categorization as D soils? X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 5 Is measured infiltration rate below proposed facility less than 0.3 inches per hour? This calculation shall be based on the methods described in Appendix VII. X Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 6 Would reduction of over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 7 Would an increase in infiltration over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Infiltration Screening Results (check box corresponding to result): 8 Is there substantial evidence that infiltration from the project would result in a significant increase in I&I to the sanitary sewer that cannot be sufficiently mitigated? (See Appendix XVII) Provide narrative discussion and supporting evidence: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 9 If any answer from row 1-3 is yes: infiltration of any volume is not feasible within the DMA or equivalent. Provide basis: Summarize findings of infeasibility screening 10 If any answer from row 4-7 is yes, infiltration is permissible but is not presumed to be feasible for the entire DCV. Criteria for designing biotreatment BMPs to achieve the maximum feasible infiltration and ET shall apply. Provide basis: Summarize findings of infeasibility screening 11 If all answers to rows 1 through 11 are no, infiltration of the full DCV is potentially feasible, BMPs must be designed to infiltrate the full DCV to the maximum extent practicable. X TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate and Worksheet Factor Description Assigned Weight (w) Product (p) p = w x v Soil assessment methods 0.25 Predominant soil texture 0.25 Site soil variability 0.25 Depth to groundwater / impervious layer 0.25 2 (per geotech) Tributary area size 0.25 0.25 Level of pretreatment/ expected sediment loads 0.25 0.25 Redundancy 0.25 0.75 Compaction during construction 0.25 0.5 1.75 Note: The minimum combined adjustment factor shall not be less than 2.0 and the maximum combined adjustment factor shall not exceed 9.0. VII-35 December 20, 2013 Supporting Data Briefly describe infiltration test and provide reference to test forms: Combined Safety Factor, STotal= SA x SB 3.5 Observed Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, Kobserved (corrected for test-specific bias) 3.2 Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, KDESIGN = KObserved / STotal 0.91 B Design Design Safety Factor, SB = p Factor Category Factor Value (v) A Suitability Assessment Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, SA = p Capture Efficiency Method for Underground Infiltration Facility Step 1: Determine the drawdown time associated with the selected facility geometry DD = (dP / KDESIGN) × 12 DD = (3.64 ft / 0.91 in/hr) × 12 in DD = 48 hr Where: DD = time to completely drain infiltration facility depth, hours dP = depth below overflow device, ft KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr Step 2: Determine the Required Adjusted DCV for this Drawdown Time Per Worksheet C adjusted DCV for 48 hr drawdown time = 2,010 cf Step 3: Determine Underground Infiltration Facility Storage Adjusted DCV = 2,010 cf at 3.64 ft depth Infiltration Facility is 3.5-ft diameter perforated pipe embedded in gravel. Total pipe and gravel storage provided = 2,170 cf DMA-2 0.034 acres 0.0026 acres Effect of individual HSCi per criteria in HSC Type/ Description/ Reference BMP Fact Sheet BMP Fact Sheets (XIV.1) (d HSCi )1 Impervious Area Tributary to HSCi (IA i ) d i × IA i HSC-2 Impervious Area Dispersion Ratio Pervious to Impervious > 2 1 0.0026 0.0026 Box 1: 0.0026 Box 2:0.0026 [Box 1]/[Box 2]:1 80% HSC ID DMA-2 ∑ d i × IA i = IA total = d HSC total = Percent Capture Provided by HSCs (Table III.1) TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet A: Hydrologic Source Control Calculation Form Drainage area ID Total drainage area Total drainage area Impervious Area (IAtotal) TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2)Tc=8.37 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (Tc) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I 1 I1=0.24 in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, d HSC (inches) (Worksheet A)dHSC=0 inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y 2 (Worksheet A)Y2=0 % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I 2 I2=0 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, I design = I 1 -I 2 Idesign=0.24 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres)A=0.802 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless)imp=0.896 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C=0.8220 4 Calculate design flowrate, Q design = (C x i design x A)Qdesign=0.158 cfs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate Supporting Calculations Describe system: Modular Wetland System utilized for pretreatment: Model = MWS-L-4-15 Treatment Capacity = 0.175 cfs Provide time of concentration assumptions: Tc per 2-year proposed hydrology calculations. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 17 V. Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Responsibility for BMPs (O&M Plan) Responsible Party Information (Local Contact Information) Name: Alex Santana Title: Environmental Services Director Company: Park Plaza Phone Number: (714) 997-5355 ext. 3611 Table 8 - Frequency Inspection Matrix BMP Responsible Party *Maintenance Activity *Inspection/Maintenance Frequency Source Control BMPs (Structural and Non-structural) N1 – Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants KC Orange II LP Provide educational materials to owners, tenants and occupants. Initially at lease signing, Annually N2 – Activity Restrictions KC Orange II LP Restrict activities that potentially have adverse impacts on water quality (vehicle maintenance, washing, etc.) The site shall remain in compliance with the Orange Municipal Code at all times. Daily N3 – Common Area Landscape Management KC Orange II LP Maintain landscape, restrict fertilizer and pesticide use, dispose of landscape waste properly. Every two weeks at minimum N4 – BMP Maintenance KC Orange II LP Maintain BMPs in accordance with Section V and Appendix D. Ongoing N11 – Common Area Litter Control KC Orange II LP Monitor, pick up litter and dispose of properly. Daily inspection, Weekly bin collection N12 – Employee Training KC Orange II LP Educate all employees and managers on storm Initially upon hire, annually thereafter WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 18 water pollution prevention practices. N14 – Common Area Catch Basin Inspection KC Orange II LP Maintain, inspect and clean drains as necessary. Before/after rain events and annually prior to rainy season (October 1st) N15 – Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots KC Orange II LP Sweep (vacuum or mechanical broom) parking areas and drive aisles to prevent accumulation of litter and debris. Weekly S1 – Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage KC Orange II LP Mark all inlets, maintain, inspect and re-mark as necessary for legibility with the message “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean” Annually S3 – Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction KC Orange II LP Outdoor refuse receptacles shall be covered, graded and paved to prevent run- on. Inspect, sweep and maintain area. Weekly S4 – Use efficient irrigation systems and landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control KC Orange II LP Design irrigation system to eliminate overspray to hardscape areas and minimize irrigation runoff. Adjust timing and frequency as necessary. Every two weeks and maintain when needed to prevent nuisance conditions S13 – Wash water control for food preparation areas KC Orange II LP Maintain area using dry methods (i.e., sweeping), properly stock spill kits, store and properly dispose of used oil, and discharge wash water to sanitary sewer. Clean mats indoors or with dry cleaning methods only. Daily WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 19 Low Impact Development and Treatment BMPs Modular Wetland System KC Orange II LP Inspect for trash, sediment and ponded water. Properly remove and dispose of trash and sediment. Additional information provided in Appendix D, following manufacturer’s recommendations. Monthly inspection, Prior to rainy season (October 1st), Annually Storage and Infiltration KC Orange II LP Inspect for trash, sediment and ponded water. Properly remove and dispose of trash and sediment. Additional information provided in Appendix D, following manufacturer’s recommendations. Flush and vacuum to remove sediment accumulated within chambers. Prior to rainy season (October 1st), Flush and vacuum as needed to prevent clogging *Attach in appendix additional inspection, maintenance and operations information if required. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 20 Regulatory Permits None applicable. Funding Long-term funding for the installation and on-going maintenance for all BMPs will be provided by KC Orange II LP through the standard operating budget. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 21 OWNER SELF CERTIFICATION STATEMENT As the owner representative of the Park Plaza Expansion for which a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was approved by the City, I hereby certify under penalty of law that all Best Management Practices contained within the approved Project W QMP have been maintained and inspected in accordance with the schedule and frequency outlined in the approved WQMP Maintenance Table. The maintenance activities and inspections conducted are shown in the attached table and have been performed by qualified and knowledgeable individuals. Structural Treatment BMPs have been inspected and certified by a licensed professional engineer. To the best of my knowledge, the information submitted is true and accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and citations for violating water quality regulations. Signed: ____________________________________ Name: Axel Guerra Title: Acquisition and Development Manager Company: KC Orange II LP Address: 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephone Number: 760-804-7065 Date: _________________ WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 22 BMP Implementation Tracking Table BMP Activity Completion Dates or Frequency Initial Source Control BMPs (Structural and Nonstructural) N1 – Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Provide educational materials to owners, tenants and occupants. N2 – Activity Restrictions Restrict activities that potentially have adverse impacts on water quality (vehicle maintenance, washing, etc.) The site shall remain in compliance with the Orange Municipal Code at all times. N3 – Common Area Landscape Management Maintain landscape, restrict fertilizer and pesticide use, dispose of landscape waste properly. N4 – BMP Maintenance Maintain BMPs in accordance with Section V and Appendix D. N11 – Common Area Litter Control Monitor, pick up litter and dispose of properly. N12 – Employee Training Educate all employees and managers on storm water pollution prevention practices. N14 – Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Maintain, inspect and clean drains. N15 – Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Sweep (vacuum or mechanical broom) parking areas and drive aisles to prevent accumulation of litter and debris. S1 – Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage Mark all inlets, maintain, inspect and re-mark as necessary for legibility with the message “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean” S3 – Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction Outdoor refuse receptacles shall be covered, graded and paved to prevent run-on. Inspect, sweep and maintain area. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 23 S4 – Use efficient irrigation systems and landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control Design irrigation system to eliminate overspray to hardscape areas and minimize irrigation runoff. Adjust timing and frequency as necessary. S13 – Properly design wash water control for food preparation areas Maintain area using dry methods (i.e., sweeping), properly stock spill kits, store and properly dispose of used oil, and discharge wash water to sanitary sewer. Clean mats indoors or with dry cleaning methods only. Low Impact Development and Treatment BMPs Modular Wetland System Inspect for trash, sediment and ponded water. Properly remove and dispose of trash and sediment. Additional information provided in Appendix D, following manufacturer’s recommendations. Storage and Infiltration Inspect for trash, sediment and ponded water. Properly remove and dispose of trash and sediment. Additional information provided in Appendix D, following manufacturer’s recommendations. Flush and vacuum to remove sediment accumulated within chambers. * This sheet is to be submitted annually with the Owner Self Certification Statement. ** Structural Treatment BMPs should be certified by a Licensed Professional Engineer. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 24 VI. Location Map, Site Plan, and BMP Details Include a location map that identifies project location and proximity to nearby water bodies. In an 11X17 sheet Identify land use, cover, feasibility constraints, structures, buildings, number of units, landscape areas, storm drain inlets, storm drain facilities, drainage flow direction, structural and treatment BMP locations, dumpsters, trash enclosures, wash areas, etc. Delineate drainage management areas showing limits (acreage) of each drainage area for all structural, treatment and Low Impact Development BMPs used and provide BMP details on plan or in Appendix C. Location Map 300ft Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html 1/1 Project Site WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 25 VII. Educational Materials Education Materials Residential Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips Other Material Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System Responsible Pest Control Sewer Spill Response Tips for the Home Improvement Projects Tips for Horse Care Tips for Landscaping and Gardening Tips for Pet Care Tips for Pool Maintenance Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 26 Appendix A: Conditions of Approval Resolution Number____________ dated__________ WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 27 Appendix B: Educational Material For More Information Aliso Viejo (949) 425-2535 Anaheim Public Works Operations (714) 765-6860 Brea Engineering (714) 990-7666 Buena Park Public Works (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services (714) 754-5323 Cypress Public Works (714) 229-6740 Dana Point Public Works (949) 248-3584 Fountain Valley Public Works (714) 593-4441 Fullerton Engineering Dept (714) 738-6853 Garden Grove Public Works (714) 741-5956 Huntington Beach Public Works (714) 536-5431 Irvine Public Works (949) 724-6315 La Habra Public Services (562) 905-9792 La Palma Public Works (714) 690-3310 Laguna Beach Water Quality (949) 497-0378 Laguna Hills Public Services (949) 707-2650 Laguna Niguel Public Works (949) 362-4337 Laguna Woods Public Works (949) 639-0500 Lake Forest Public Works (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community Dev (562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo Public Works (949) 470-3056 Newport Beach, Code & Water Quality Enforcement (949) 644-3215 Orange Public Works (714) 532-6480 Placentia Public Works (714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita (949) 635-1800 San Clemente Environmental Programs (949) 361-6143 San Juan Capistrano Engineering (949) 234-4413 Santa Ana Public Works (714) 647-3380 Seal Beach Engineering (562) 431-2527 x317 Stanton Public Works (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Works/Engineering (714) 573-3150 Villa Park Engineering (714) 998-1500 Westminster Public Works/Engineering (714) 898-3311 x446 Yorba Linda Engineering (714) 961-7138 Orange County Stormwater Program (877) 897-7455 Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) On-line Water Pollution Problem Reporting Form w w w o c w a t e r s h e d s c o m The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door California Environmental Protection Agency www calepa ca gov • Air Resources Board www arb ca gov • Department of Pesticide Regulation www cdpr ca gov • Department of Toxic Substances Control www dtsc ca gov • Integrated Waste Management Board www ciwmb ca gov • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment www oehha ca gov • State Water Resources Control Board www waterboards ca gov Earth 911 - Community-Specific Environmental Information 1-800-cleanup or visit www 1800cleanup org Health Care Agency’s Ocean and Bay Water Closure and Posting Hotline (714) 433-6400 or visit www ocbeachinfo com Integrated Waste Management Dept. of Orange County (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com for information on household hazardous waste collection centers, recycling centers and solid waste collection O.C. Agriculture Commissioner (714) 447-7100 or visit www ocagcomm com Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook Visit www cabmphandbooks com UC Master Gardener Hotline (714) 708-1646 or visit www uccemg com Did You Know? Most people believe that the largest source of water pollution in urban areas comes from specific sources such as factories and sewage treatment plants In fact, the largest source of water pollution comes from city streets, neighborhoods, construction sites and parking lots This type of pollution is sometimes called “non-point source” pollution There are two types of non-point source pollution: stormwater and urban runoff pollution Stormwater runoff results from rainfall When rainstorms cause large volumes of water to rinse the urban landscape, picking up pollutants along the way Urban runoff can happen any time of the year when excessive water use from irrigation, vehicle washing and other sources carries trash, lawn clippings and other urban pollutants into storm drains Where Does It Go? Anything we use outside homes, vehicles and businesses – like motor oil, paint, pesticides, fertilizers and cleaners – can be blown or washed into storm drains A little water from a garden hose or rain can also send materials into storm drains Storm drains are separate from our sanitary sewer systems; unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks or toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways Printed on Recycled Paper The Orange County Stormwater Program has created and moderates an electronic mailing list to facilitate communications, take questions and exchange ideas among its users about issues and topics related to stormwater and urban runoff and the implementation of program elements To join the list, please send an email to ocstormwaterinfo-join@list ocwatersheds com Orange County Stormwater Program Even if you live miles from the Pacific Ocean, you may be unknowingly polluting it.Sources of Non-Point Source Pollution Automotive leaks and spills Improper disposal of used oil and other engine fluids Metals found in vehicle exhaust, weathered paint, rust, metal plating and tires Pesticides and fertilizers from lawns, gardens and farms Improper disposal of cleaners, paint and paint removers Soil erosion and dust debris from landscape and construction activities Litter, lawn clippings, animal waste, and other organic matter Oil stains on parking lots and paved surfaces The Effect on the OceanNon-point source pollution can have a serious impact on water quality in Orange County Pollutants from the storm drain system can harm marine life as well as coastal and wetland habitats They can also degrade recreation areas such as beaches, harbors and bays Stormwater quality management programs have been developed throughout Orange County to educate and encourage the public to protect water quality, monitor runoff in the storm drain system, investigate illegal dumping and maintain storm drains Support from Orange County residents and businesses is needed to improve water quality and reduce urban runoff pollution Proper use and disposal of materials will help stop pollution before it reaches the storm drain and the ocean Dumping one quart of motor oil into a storm drain can contaminate 250,000 gallons of water. Follow these simple steps to help reduce water pollution: Household Activities Do not rinse spills with water Use dry cleanup methods such as applying cat litter or another absorbent material, sweep and dispose of in the trash Take items such as used or excess batteries, oven cleaners, automotive fluids, painting products and cathode ray tubes, like TVs and computer monitors, to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC) For a HHWCC near you call (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com Do not hose down your driveway, sidewalk or patio to the street, gutter or storm drain Sweep up debris and dispose of it in the trash Automotive Take your vehicle to a commercial car wash whenever possible If you wash your vehicle at home, choose soaps, cleaners, or detergents labeled non-toxic, phosphate- free or biodegradable Vegetable and citrus-based products are typically safest for the environment Do not allow washwater from vehicle washing to drain into the street, gutter or storm drain Excess washwater should be disposed of in the sanitary sewer (through a sink or toilet) or onto an absorbent surface like your lawn Monitor your vehicles for leaks and place a pan under leaks Keep your vehicles well maintained to stop and prevent leaks Never pour oil or antifreeze in the street, gutter or storm drain Recycle these substances at a service station, a waste oil collection center or used oil recycling center For the nearest Used Oil Collection Center call 1-800-CLEANUP or visit www 1800cleanup org Never allow pollutants to enter the street, gutter or storm drain! Lawn and Garden Pet and animal waste Pesticides Clippings, leaves and soil Fertilizer Common Pollutants Automobile Oil and grease Radiator fluids and antifreeze Cleaning chemicals Brake pad dust Home Maintenance Detergents, cleaners and solvents Oil and latex paint Swimming pool chemicals Outdoor trash and litter The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Trash Place trash and litter that cannot be recycled in securely covered trash cans Whenever possible, buy recycled products Remember: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Pet Care Always pick up after your pet Flush waste down the toilet or dispose of it in the trash Pet waste, if left outdoors, can wash into the street, gutter or storm drain If possible, bathe your pets indoors If you must bathe your pet outside, wash it on your lawn or another absorbent/permeable surface to keep the washwater from entering the street, gutter or storm drain Follow directions for use of pet care products and dispose of any unused products at a HHWCC Pool Maintenance Pool and spa water must be dechlorinated and free of excess acid, alkali or color to be allowed in the street, gutter or storm drain When it is not raining, drain dechlorinated pool and spa water directly into the sanitary sewer Some cities may have ordinances that do not allow pool water to be disposed of in the storm drain Check with your city Landscape and Gardening Do not over-water Water your lawn and garden by hand to control the amount of water you use or set irrigation systems to reflect seasonal water needs If water flows off your yard onto your driveway or sidewalk, your system is over-watering Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain Instead, dispose of waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or as green waste through your city’s recycling program Follow directions on pesticides and fertilizer, (measure, do not estimate amounts) and do not use if rain is predicted within 48 hours Take unwanted pesticides to a HHWCC to be recycled For locations and hours of HHWCC, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com Pet Waste• Pollution: Pet waste carries bacteria through our watersheds and eventually will be washed out to the ocean. This can pose a health risk to swimmers and surfers. • Solution: Pick up after your pets! Trash and Debris• Pollution: Trash and debris can enter waterways by wind, littering and careless maintenance of trash receptacles. Street sweeping collects some of this trash; however, much of what isn’t captured ends up in our storm drain system where it flows untreated out to the ocean. • Solution: Don’t litter and make sure trash containers are properly covered. It is far more expensive to clean up the litter and trash that ends up in our waterways than it is to prevent it in the first place. Come out to one of Orange County’s many locations for Coastal and Inner-Coastal Cleanup Day, which is held in September. Motor Oil / Vehicle Fluids• Pollution: Oil and petroleum products from our vehicles are toxic to people, wildlife and plants. • Solution: Fix any leaks from your vehicle and keep the maintenance up on your car. Use absorbent material such as cat litter on oil spills, then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash. Recycle used motor oil at a local Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center. Low Impact Development, Water Conservation & Pollution Prevention The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door DID YOU KNOW? Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use A TEAM EFFORT The Orange County Stormwater Program has teamed with the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and the University of California Cooperative Extension Program (UCCE) to develop this pamphlet. Low Impact Development (LID) and sustainable water use prevents water pollution and conserves water for drinking and reuse. Reducing your water use and the amount of water flowing from your home protects the environment and saves you money. Thank you for making water protection a priority! For more information, please visit Orange County Stormwater Program www.ocwatersheds.com/publiced/ Municipal Water District of Orange County www.mwdoc.com University of California Master Gardeners of Orange County www.uccemg.com UC Cooperative Extension OC Water Quality and Water Resources www.ucanr.org/sites/urbanwatermgmt/ Pesticides and Fertilizer • Pollution: The same pesticides that are designed to be toxic to pests can have an equally lethal impact on our marine life. The same fertilizer that promotes plant growth in lawns and gardens can also create nuisance algae blooms, which remove oxygen from the water and clog waterways when it decomposes. • Solution: Never use pesticides or fertilizer within 48 hours of an anticipated rainstorm. Use only as much as is directed on the label and keep it off driveways and sidewalks. Dirt and Sediment• Pollution: Dirt or sediment can impede the flow of the stormwater and negatively impact stream habitat as it travels through waterways and deposits downstream. Pollutants can attach to sediment, which can then be transported through our waterways. • Solution: Protect dirt stockpiles by covering them with tarps or secure plastic sheets to prevent wind or rain from allowing dirt or sediment to enter the storm drain system. Metals• Pollution: Metals and other toxins present in car wash water can harm important plankton, which forms the base of the aquatic food chain. • Solution: Take your car to a commercial car wash where the wash water is captured and treated at a local wastewater treatment plant. The Pollution SolutionSeveral residential activities can result in water pollution. Among these activities are car washing and hosing off driveways and sidewalks. Both activities can waste water and result in excess runoff. Water conservation methods described in this pamphlet can prevent considerable amounts of runoff and conserve water. By taking your car to a commercial car wash and by sweeping driveways and sidewalks, you can further prevent the transport of pollutants to Orange County waterways. Here are some of the common pollutants for which you can be part of the solution: To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Prevention Reporting Hotline at 1-877-89-SPILL \ (1-877-897-7455) Special Thanks to The City of Los Angeles Stormwater Program for the use of its artwork The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for the use of the California-Friendly Plant and Native Habitat photosDid you know that most of the pollution found in our waterways is not from a single source, but from a “non- point” source meaning the accumulation of pollution from residents and businesses throughout the community. OPTIONS FOR RAINWATER HARVESTING AND REUSE Rainwater harvesting is a great way to save money, prevent pollution and reduce potable water use. To harvest your rainwater, simply redirect the runoff from roofs and downspouts to rain barrels. Rain gardens are another option; these reduce runoff as well as encourage infiltration. Downspout Disconnection/Redirection Disconnecting downspouts from pipes running to the gutter prevents runoff from transporting pollutants to the storm drain. Once disconnected, downspouts can be redirected to rain gardens or other vegetated areas, or be connected to a rain barrel. Rain Barrels Rain barrels capture rainwater flow from roofs for reuse in landscape irrigation. Capacity of rain barrels needed for your home will depend on the amount of roof area and rainfall received. When purchasing your rain barrel, make sure it includes a screen, a spigot to siphon water for use, an overflow tube to allow for excess water to run out and a connector if you wish to connect multiple barrels to add capacity of water storage. Mosquito growth prevention is very important when installing a rain barrel. The best way to prevent mosquito breeding is to eliminate entry points by ensuring all openings are sealed tightly. If these methods are unsuccessful, products are available to kill mosquito larvae, but that are harmless to animals and humans. Regular application of these products is essential. Please visit the Orange County Vector Control website for more information at www.ocvcd.org/mosquitoes3.php. Rain Gardens Rain gardens allow runoff to be directed from your roof downspout into a landscaped area. Vegetation and rocks in the garden will slow the flow of water to allow for infiltration into the soil. Plants and soil particles will absorb pollutants from the roof runoff. By utilizing a native plant palate, rain gardens can be maintained all year with minimal additional irrigation. These plants are adapted to the semi-arid climate of Southern California, require less water and can reduce your water bill. Before modifying your yard to install a rain garden, please consult your local building and/or planning departments to ensure your garden plan follows pertinent building codes and ordinances. Besides codes and ordinances, some home owner associations also have guidelines for yard modifications. If your property is in hill areas or includes engineered slopes, please seek professional advice before proceeding with changes. RUNOFF, RAINWATER AND REUSE For information on how to disconnect a downspout or to install and maintain a rain barrel or rain garden at your home, please see the Los Angeles Rainwater Harvesting Program, A Homeowner’s “How-To” Guide, November 2009 at www.larainwaterharvesting.org/ Water runoff from sprinklers left on too long will carry pollutants into our waterways. Permeable pavement allows water runoff to infiltrate through the soil and prevents most pollutants from reaching the storm drain system. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? Low Impact Development (LID) is a method of development that seeks to maintain the natural hydrologic character of an area. LID provides a more sustainable and pollution-preventative approach to water management. New water quality regulations require implementation of LID in larger new developments and encourage implementation of LID and other sustainable practices in existing residential areas. Implementing modifications to your lawn or garden can reduce pollution in our environment, conserve water and reduce your water bill. Where Does Water Runoff Go? Stormwater, or water from rainfall events, and runoff from outdoor water use such as sprinklers and hoses flows from homes directly into catch basins and the storm drain system. After entering the storm drain, the water flows untreated into streams, rivers, bays and ultimately the Pacific Ocean. Runoff can come from lawns, gardens, driveways, sidewalks and roofs. As it flows over hard, impervious surfaces, it picks up pollutants. Some pollutants carried by the water runoff include trash, pet waste, pesticides, fertilizer, motor oil and more. Water Conservation Pollution not only impairs the water quality for habitat and recreation, it can also reduce the water available for reuse. Runoff allowed to soak into the ground is cleaned as it percolates through the soil, replenishing depleted groundwater supplies. Groundwater provides at least 50% of the total water for drinking and other indoor household activities in north and central Orange County. When land is covered with roads, parking lots, homes, etc., there is less land to take in the water and more hard surfaces over which the water can flow. In Orange County, 60-70% of water used by residents and businesses goes to irrigation and other outdoor uses. Reusing rainwater to irrigate our lawn not only reduces the impact of water pollution from runoff, but it also is a great way to conserve our precious water resources and replenish our groundwater basin. Permeable pavement allows water runoff to infiltrate through the soil and prevents most pollutants from reaching the storm drain system. OTHER WATER CONSERVATION AND POLLUTION PREVENTION TECHNIQUES Native Vegetation and Maintenance “California Friendly” plants or native vegetation can significantly reduce water use. These plants often require far less fertilizers and pesticides, which are two significant pollutants found in Orange County waterways. Replacing water “thirsty” plants and grass types with water efficient natives is a great way to save water and reduce the need for potentially harmful pesticides and fertilizer. Please see the California Friendly Garden Guide produced by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and associated Southern California Water Agencies for a catalog of California friendly plants and other garden resources at www.bewaterwise.com/Gardensoft. Weed Free Yards Weeds are water thieves. They often reproduce quickly and rob your yard of both water and nutrients. Weed your yard by hand if possible. If you use herbicides to control the weeds, use only the amount recommended on the label and never use it if rain is forecast within the next 48 hours. Soil Amendments Soil amendments such as green waste (e.g. grass clippings, compost, etc.) can be a significant source of nutrients and can help keep the soil near the roots of plants moist. However, they can cause algal booms if they get into our waterways, which reduces the amount of oxygen in the water and impacts most aquatic organisms. It is important to apply soil amendments more than 48 hours prior to predicted rainfall. IRRIGATE EFFICIENTLY Smart Irrigation Controllers Smart Irrigation Controllers have internal clocks as well as sensors that will turn off the sprinklers in response to environmental changes. If it is raining, too windy or too cold, the smart irrigation control sprinklers will automatically shut off. Check with your local water agency for available rebates on irrigation controllers and smart timers. • Aim your sprinklers at your lawn, not the sidewalk – By simply adjusting the direction of your sprinklers you can save water, prevent water pollution from runoff, keep your lawn healthy and save money. • Set a timer for your sprinklers – lawns absorb the water they need to stay healthy within a few minutes of turning on the sprinklers. Time your sprinklers; when water begins running off your lawn, you can turn them off. Your timer can be set to water your lawn for this duration every time. • Water at Sunrise – Watering early in the morning will reduce water loss due to evaporation. Additionally, winds tend to die down in the early morning so the water will get to the lawn as intended. • Water by hand – Instead of using sprinklers, consider watering your yard by hand. Hand- watering ensures that all plants get the proper amount of water and you will prevent any water runoff, which wastes water and carries pollutants into our waterways. • Fix leaks - Nationwide, households waste one trillion gallons of water a year to leaks – that is enough water to serve the entire state of Texas for a year. If your garden hose is leaking, replace the nylon or rubber hose washer and ensure a tight connection. Fix broken sprinklers immediately. Do your part to prevent water pollution in our creeks, rivers, bays and ocean. Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays, and ocean are important to Orange County.However, many common household activities can lead to water pollution if you’re not careful. Litter, oil, chemicals and other substances that are left on your yard or driveway can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Over-watering your lawn and washing your car can also flush materials into the storm drains. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated. You would never pour soap, fertilizers or oil into the ocean, so don’t let them enter streets, gutters or storm drains. Follow the easy tips in this brochure to help prevent water pollution.GENUINE RECYCLED P APER 50% PRE-CONSUMER AND 15% POST-CONSUMER REMEMBER THE WATER IN YOUR STORM DRAIN IS NOT TREATED BEFORE IT ENTERS OUR WATERWAYS The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. The tips contained in this brochure provide useful information to help prevent water pollution while performing everyday household activities. If you have other suggestions, please contact your city’s stormwater representatives or call the Orange County Stormwater Program. Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Household Tips Gardening Activities �Follow directions on pesticides and fertilizers, (measure, do not estimate amounts) and do not use if rain is predicted within 48 hours. �Water your lawn and garden by hand to control the amount of water you use. Set irrigation systems to reflect seasonal water needs. If water flows off your yard and onto your driveway or sidewalk, your system is over-watering. �Mulch clippings or leave them on the lawn. If necessary, dispose in a green waste container. �Cultivate your garden often to control weeds. Washing and Maintaining Your Car �Take your car to a commercial car wash whenever possible. �Choose soaps, cleaners, or detergents labeled “non-toxic,” “phosphate free” or “biodegradable.” Vegetable and citrus- based products are typically safest for the environment, but even these should not be allowed into the storm drain. �Shake floor mats into a trash can or vacuum to clean. �Do not use acid-based wheel cleaners and “hose off” engine degreasers at home. They can be used at a commercial facility, which can properly process the washwater. �Do not dump washwater onto your driveway, sidewalk, street, gutter or storm drain.Excess washwater should be disposed of in the sanitary sewers (through a sink, or toilet) or onto an absorbent surface like your lawn. �Use a nozzle to turn off water when not actively washing down automobile. �Monitor vehicles for leaks and place pans under leaks. Keep your car well maintained to stop and prevent leaks. �Use cat litter or other absorbents and sweep to remove any materials deposited by vehicles. Contain sweepings and dispose of at a HHWCC. �Perform automobile repair and maintenance under a covered area and use drip pans or plastic sheeting to keep spills and waste material from reaching storm drains. �Never pour oil or antifreeze in the street, gutter or storm drains. Recycle these substances at a service station, HHWCC, or used oil recycling center.For the nearest Used Oil Collection Center call 1-800-CLEANUP or visit www.ciwmb.ca.gov/UsedOil. Pollution Prevention Household Activities �Do not rinse spills with water!Sweep outdoor spills and dispose of in the trash. For wet spills like oil, apply cat litter or another absorbent material, then sweep and bring to a household hazardous waste collection center (HHWCC). �Securely cover trash cans. �Take household hazardous waste to a house- hold hazardous waste collection center. �Store household hazardous waste in closed, labeled containers inside or under a cover. �Do not hose down your driveway, sidewalk or patio. Sweep up debris and dispose of in trash. �Always pick up after your pet. Flush waste down the toilet or dispose of in the trash. �Bathe pets indoors or have them professionally groomed. Household Hazardous Wastes include: �Batteries �Paint thinners, paint strippers and removers �Adhesives �Drain openers �Oven cleaners �Wood and metal cleaners and polishes �Herbicides and pesticides �Fungicides/wood preservatives �Automotive fluids and products �Grease and rust solvents �Thermometers and other productscontaining mercury �Fluorescent lamps �Cathode ray tubes, e.g. TVs, computermonitors �Pool and spa chemicals For locations and hours of Household Hazardous Waste Collection Centers in Anaheim, Huntington Beach, Irvine and San Juan Capistrano, call (714)834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. Ayude a prevenir la contaminación del océano Do your part to prevent water pollution in our creeks, rivers, bays and ocean. Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, not properly disposing of household hazardous waste can lead to water pollution. Batteries, electronics, paint, oil, gardening chemicals, cleaners and other hazardous materials cannot be thrown in the trash. They also must never be poured or thrown into yards, sidewalks, driveways, gutters or streets. Rain or other water could wash the materials into the storm drain and eventually into our waterways and the ocean. In addition, hazardous waste must not be poured in the sanitary sewers (sinks and toilets). For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com To Report Illegal Dumping of Household Hazardous Waste call 1-800-69-TOXIC To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. ORANGE COUNTY Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Printed on Recycled Paper NEVER DISPOSE OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE IN THE TRASH, STREET, GUTTER, STORM DRAIN OR SEWER. Pollution Prevention Leftover household products that contain corrosive, toxic, ignitable, or reactive ingredients are considered to be “household hazardous waste” or “HHW.” HHW can be found throughout your home, including the bathroom, kitchen, laundry room and garage. Disposal of HHW down the drain, on the ground, into storm drains, or in the trash is illegal and unsafe. Proper disposal of HHW is actually easy. Simply drop them off at a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC) for free disposal and recycling. Many materials including anti-freeze, latex- based paint, motor oil and batteries can be recycled. Some centers have a “Stop & Swap” program that lets you take partially used home, garden, and automobile products free of charge. There are four HHWCCs in Orange County: Anaheim: ..................1071 N. Blue Gum St Huntington Beach: .........17121 Nichols St Irvine:............................ 6411 Oak Canyon San Juan Capistrano:...32250 La Pata Ave Centers are open Tuesday-Saturday, 9 a.m.- 3 p.m. Centers are closed on rainy days and major holidays. For more information, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. Common household hazardous wastes Batteries Paint and paint products Adhesives Drain openers Household cleaning products Wood and metal cleaners and polishes Pesticides Fungicides/wood preservatives Automotive products (antifreeze, motor oil, fluids) Grease and rust solvents Fluorescent lamps Mercury (thermometers & thermostats) All forms of electronic waste including computers and microwaves Pool & spa chemicals Cleaners Medications Propane (camping & BBQ) Mercury-containing lamps Television & monitors (CRTs, flatscreens) Tips for household hazardous waste Never dispose of HHW in the trash, street, gutter, storm drain or sewer. Keep these materials in closed, labeled containers and store materials indoors or under a cover. When possible, use non-hazardous products. Reuse products whenever possible or share with family and friends. Purchase only as much of a product as you’ll need. Empty containers may be disposed of in the trash. HHW can be harmful to humans, pets and the environment. Report emergencies to 911. WHEN POSSIBLE, USE NON-HAZARDOUS OR LESS-HAZARDOUS PRODUCTS. Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center CENTRAL COUNTY For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.watersheds.com. For information about the proper disposal of household hazardous waste, call the Household Waste Hotline at (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. For additional information about the nearest oil recycling center, call the Used Oil Program at 1-800-CLEANUP or visit www.cleanup.org. Did you know that just one quart of oil can pollute 250,000 gallons of water? A clean ocean and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and beaches are important to Orange County. However, not properly disposing of used oil can lead to water pollution. If you pour or drain oil onto driveways, sidewalks or streets, it can be washed into the storm drain. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering the ocean. Help prevent water pollution by taking your used oil to a used oil collection center. Included in this brochure is a list of locations that will accept up to five gallons of used motor oil at no cost. Many also accept used oil filters. Please contact the facility before delivering your used oil. This listing of companies is for your reference and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of the company. Please note that used oil filters may not be disposed of with regular household trash. They must be taken to a household hazardous waste collection or recycling center in Anaheim, Huntington Beach, Irvine or San Juan Capistrano. For information about these centers, visit www.oclandfills.com. Please do not mix your oil with other substances! The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door DTP113 Rev 8/03 printed on recycled paper Used Oil Collection Centers This information was provided by the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management Department and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). Balboa Hill’s Boat Service 814 E Bay Ave., Balboa, CA 92661 (949)675-0740( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03538 Balboa Island Island Marine Fuel 406 S Bay Front, Balboa Island, CA 92662 (949)673-1103( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03728 Corona Del Mar Corona Del Mar 76 2201 E. Pacific Coast Hwy., Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 (949)673-3320( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06620 Corona Del Mar Chevron 2546 E.Coast Hwy., Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 (949)495-0774(14) CIWMB#: 30-C-06424 Mobil (Harbor View) 2500 San Joaquin Hills Rd., Corona Del Mar,CA 92625 (949)640-4759( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03363 Costa Mesa AutoZone #5520 744 W.19th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (901)495-7159( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05992 Big O Tires #5571 3181 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (949)443-4155( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04676 Big O Tires #694 322 E. 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)642-4131( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05811 Coast General Performance 2855 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)540-5710( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05916 Connell Chevrolet 2828 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)546-1200( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06286 EZ Lube Inc #15 3599 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)966-1647( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03137 EZ Lube Inc #46 400 E 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (714)556-1312( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05779 EZ Lube Inc. #44 2248 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (714)556-1312( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05737 Firestone Store #71T7 475 E 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)646-2444( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02120 Jiffy Lube #1969 300 E 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)548-2505( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05553 Jiffy Lube #1970 2175 Newport Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)548-4150( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05554 Jiffy Lube #607 2255 Fairview Rd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)650-5823( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05551 Jiffy Lube #861 375 Bristol St., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)557-5823( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05552 Kragen Auto Parts #0725 1739 Superior Ave., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)642-3384( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02624 Kragen Auto Parts #0796 1175 Baker Blvd., Unit E, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)662-2005( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02664 Nabers Cadillac 2600 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)444-5200( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05051 Oil Stop Inc. Oil Stop Inc. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)434-8350( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06293 Pep Boys #660 2946 Bristol St., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)549-1533( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03416 Plaza Chevron Service Center 3048 Bristol Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)545-4257( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-01123 Scher Tire Inc #15 dba Goodyear Tire 1596 Newport Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)548-9384( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03034 Fountain Valley Firestone Store #7147 17975 Magnolia Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)842-3341( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-01219 Golden Shell 8520 Warner Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)842-7150( ) CIWMB#: 30-P-05002 Kragen Auto Parts #0734 9880 Warner Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)964-6427( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02609 Kragen Auto Parts #1505 16147 Harbor Blvd., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)531-8525( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04125 Oil Can Henry's 9525 Warner Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)473-7705( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05843 Purrfect Auto Service #10 16780 Harbor Blvd., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)839-3899( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-01380 Huntington Beach AutoZone #5528 6800 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)891-8211( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04777 Bella Terra Car Wash 16061 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)847-4924( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06195 Big O Tires #553 19411 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)536-7571( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-00970 Econo Lube N' Tune #26 19961 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)536-6519( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06117 Expertec Automotive 7680 Talbert Ave Suite A& B, Huntington Beach, CA92648 (714)848-9222( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05914 EZ Lube Inc #16 7361 Edinger Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)899-3600( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03289 EZ Lube Inc. #79 9862 Adams St., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)556-1312( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06547 Firestone Store #71T5 16171 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)847-6081( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02118 Huntington Beach Car Wash 18971 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)847-4924( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05303 Jiffy Lube #1857 8971 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)596-7213( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05053 Kragen Auto Parts #1468 10072 Adams Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714)593-6156( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04284 Kragen Auto Parts #1511 7171 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)842-4531( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04129 Kragen Auto Parts #1633 18888 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)965-2353( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02645 Oilmax 10 Minute Lube/Wash 9862 Adams Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714)964-7110( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03219 Pep Boys #799 19122 Brookhurst St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714)964-0777( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03439 Quik Change Lube & Oil 5841 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92649 (714)840-2331( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03208 R Kids Tire and Service #6 5062 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)846-1189( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05691 Saturn of Huntington Beach 18801 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)841-5428( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05221 USA Express Tire & Service Inc 7232 Edinger Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)842-0717( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04429 Zito's Auto Care 19002 Magnolia St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714)968-8788( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03251 Irvine Firestone Store #71W4 51 Auto Center Dr., Irvine, CA 92618 (949)829-8710( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03689 Irvine City Auto Parts 14427 Culver Dr., Irvine, CA 92604 (949)551-5588( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02186 Jiffy Lube #1856 Irvine Spectrum 8777 Irvine Center Dr., Irvine, CA 92618 (949)753-0485( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06094 Jiffy Lube #1988 3080 Main St., Irvine, CA 92614 (714)961-5491(27 ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04450 Kragen Auto Parts #4174 15315 Culver Dr., Ste.#170, Irvine, CA 92604 (602)631-7115( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06417 Newport Beach Jiffy Lube #2811 1520 W Coast Hwy., Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949)764-9255( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05629 Newport Landing Fuel Dock 503 E Edgewater Newport Beach, CA 92661 (949)673-7878( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03628 Orange AutoZone #5942 1330 N. Glassell Orange, CA 92867 (714)538-4551( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04553 Big O Tires #570 1825 E Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)538-0016( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-00974 David Wilsons Ford of Orange 1350 W Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)633-6731( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02341 EZ Lube #74 3232 Chapman Ave. #E, Orange, CA 92869 (714)556-1312(106) CIWMB#: 30-C-06627 Firestone Store #7185 1690 N Tustin Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)282-8144( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-0122 Jiffy Lube #1457 433 W. Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)720-5757( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06280 Kragen Auto Parts #1764 910 Tustin St., Orange, CA 92867 (714)771-3000( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02625 Managed Mobile, Inc. 1030 N Batavia St., #B, Orange, CA 92867 (714)400-0250( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05776 Pep Boys #806 215 E Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)997-1540( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-01759 Santiago Hills Car Care 8544 East Chapman Ave., Orange, CA 92869 (714)919-1060( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05622 Scher Tire #33 1821 E. Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (909)343-3100( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06324 Tabassi Shell Service Station 830 E Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)771-6990( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-00552 The Tune-up Center 193 S Main St., Orange, CA 92868 (714)633-1876( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02091 Tony's Fuel and Towing 1650 W La Veta Ave., Orange, CA 92868 (714)953-7676( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-00868 Truck Lubrication Company 143 S. Pixley Orange, CA 92868 (714)997-7730( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06001 Santa Ana All Phase Environmental 910 E. Fourth St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)731-5995( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06116 Archie's Tire & Towing 4518 Westminster Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92703 (714)636-4518( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02058 AutoZone #3320 2007 S. Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (901)495-7217( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06508 AutoZone #5232 430 W 17th Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714)547-7003( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04609 AutoZone #5538 1101 S Bristol Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)241-0335( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-00829 Big O Tires 1211 W. Warner Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714)540-8646( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04679 Big O Tires #712 1302 E. 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)541-6811( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05813 Firestone Store #7175 3733 S Bristol Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)549-4015( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-01223 Firestone Store #71TA 101 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)542-8857( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02123 Firestone Store #71W6 2005 N Tustin Ave., Ste A, Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)541-7977( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03688 Guaranty Chevrolet Motors Inc. 711 E 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)973-1711(277 ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06506 Jiffy Lube #1303 2025 N. Tustin Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)720-5757( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06283 John's Mobil 1465 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714)835-3266( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-00578 Kragen Auto Parts #0736 1302 E 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)953-6061( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02610 Kragen Auto Parts #1253 1400 W Edinger Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)754-1432( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02627 Kragen Auto Parts #1376 521 W 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714)543-4492( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03901 Kragen Auto Parts #1516 2337 S Bristol Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)557-0787( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04106 Kragen Auto Parts #1648 1015 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)568-1570( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05664 Pep Boys #609 120 E 1st St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)547-7477( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-01738 Pep Boys #802 1107 S Harbor Blvd., Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)775-0828( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-01739 Purrfect Auto Service 2519 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714)549-7900( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02085 Saturn of Santa Ana 1350 Auto Mall Dr., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)648-2444( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05222 Scher Tire #28 1805 N Grand Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)558-8644( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03225 Tustin Big O Tires #555 131 E 1st St., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)544-9431( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-00972 EZ Lube #42 12972 Newport Ave., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)556-1312( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06408 Jiffy Lube #1406 3087 Edinger Ave., Tustin, CA 92780 (949)651-8814( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03778 Kragen Auto Parts #1533 502 B E 1st St., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)544-9249( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04128 Scher Tire Inc #17 dba Goodyear Tire 14511 Redhill Ave., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)832-6011( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03035 Villa Park Phil’s Villa Park 76 17771 Santiago Blvd., Villa Park, CA 92861 (714)637-0854( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06579 Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities such as pest control can lead to water pollution if you’re not careful. Pesticide treatments must be planned and applied properly to ensure that pesticides do not enter the street, gutter or storm drain. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never dump pesticides into the ocean, so don’t let it enter the storm drains. Pesticides can cause significant damage to our environment if used improperly. If you are thinking of using a pesticide to control a pest, there are some important things to consider. For more information, please call University of California Cooperative Extension Master Gardeners at (714) 708-1646 or visit these Web sites: www.uccemg.org www.ipm.ucdavis.edu For instructions on collecting a specimen sample visit the Orange County Agriculture Commissioner’s website at: http://www.ocagcomm.com/ser_lab.asp To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. Information From: Cheryl Wilen, Area IPM Advisor; Darren Haver, Watershed Management Advisor; Mary Louise Flint, IPM Education and Publication Director; Pamela M. Geisel, Environmental Horticulture Advisor; Carolyn L. Unruh, University of California Cooperative Extension staff writer. Photos courtesy of the UC Statewide IPM Program and Darren Haver. Funding for this brochure has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) pursuant to the Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000 (Prop. 13). Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Responsible Pest Control Printed on Recycled Paper Key Steps to Follow: Step 1: Correctly identify the pest (insect, weed, rodent, or disease) and verify that it is actually causing the problem. This is important because beneficial insects are often mistaken for pests and sprayed with pesticides needlessly. Consult with a Certified Nursery Professional at a local nursery or garden center or send a sample of the pest to the Orange County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office. Determine if the pest is still present – even though you see damage, the pest may have left. Step 2: Determine how many pests are present and causing damage. Small pest populations may be controlled more safely using non- pesticide techniques. These include removing food sources, washing off leaves with a strong stream of water, blocking entry into the home using caulking and replacing problem plants with ones less susceptible to pests. Step 3: If a pesticide must be used, choose the least toxic chemical. Obtain information on the least toxic pesticides that are effective at controlling the target pest from the UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program’s Web site at www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. Seek out the assistance of a Certified Nursery Professional at a local nursery or garden center when selecting a pesticide. Purchase the smallest amount of pesticide available. Apply the pesticide to the pest during its most vulnerable life stage. This information can be found on the pesticide label. Step 4: Wear appropriate protective clothing. Follow pesticide labels regarding specific types of protective equipment you should wear. Protective clothing should always be washed separately from other clothing. Step 5: Continuously monitor external conditions when applying pesticides such as weather, irrigation, and the presence of children and animals. Never apply pesticides when rain is predicted within the next 48 hours. Also, do not water after applying pesticides unless the directions say it is necessary. Apply pesticides when the air is still; breezy conditions may cause the spray or dust to drift away from your targeted area. In case of an emergency call 911 and/or the regional poison control number at (714) 634-5988 or (800) 544-4404 (CA only). For general questions you may also visit www.calpoison.org. Step 6: In the event of accidental spills, sweep up or use an absorbent agent to remove any excess pesticides. Avoid the use of water. Be prepared. Have a broom, dust pan, or dry absorbent material, such as cat litter, newspapers or paper towels, ready to assist in cleaning up spills. Contain and clean up the spill right away. Place contaminated materials in a doubled plastic bag. All materials used to clean up the spill should be properly disposed of according to your local Household Hazardous Waste Disposal site. Step 7: Properly store and dispose of unused pesticides. Purchase Ready-To- Use (RTU) products to avoid storing large concentrated quantities of pesticides. Store unused chemicals in a locked cabinet. Unused pesticide chemicals may be disposed of at a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center. Empty pesticide containers should be triple rinsed prior to disposing of them in the trash. Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center(714) 834-6752www.oclandfills.com Integrated Pest Management (IPM) usually combines several least toxic pest control methods for long-term prevention and management of pest problems without harming you, your family, or the environment. Three life stages of the common lady beetle, a beneficial insect. Tips for Pest Control Sewage Spill Regulatory Requirements This brochure was designed courtesy of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). For additional information, call (714) 962-2411, or visit their website at www.ocsd.com Your Responsibilities as a Private Property Owner Reference Guide Sewage Spill Allowing sewage to discharge to a gutter or storm drain may subject you to penalties and/or out-of- pocket costs to reimburse cities or public agencies for clean-up efforts. Here are the pertinent codes, fines, and agency contact information that apply. Orange County Stormwater Program 24 Hour Water Pollution Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) !County and city water quality ordinances prohibit discharges containing pollutants. California Health and Safety Code, Sections 5410-5416 !No person shall discharge raw or treated sewage or other waste in a manner that results in contamination, pollution or a nuisance. !Any person who causes or permits a sewage discharge to any state waters: •must immediately notify the local health agency of the discharge. •shall reimburse the local health agency for services that protect the public’s health and safety (water-contact receiving waters). •who fails to provide the required notice to the local health agency is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (between $500–$1,000) and/or imprisonment for less than one year. !Requires the prevention, mitigation, response to and reporting of sewage spills. California Water Code, Article 4, Chapter 4, Sections 13268-13271 California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 9.2, Article 2, Sections 2250-2260 !Any person who causes or permits sewage in excess of 1,000 gallons to be discharged to state waters shall immediately notify the Office of Emergency Services. !Any person who fails to provide the notice required by this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (less than $20,000) and/or imprisonment for not more than one year. Orange County Health Care Agency Environmental Health (714) 433-6419 Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region San Diego Region (951) 782-4130 (858) 467-2952 California Office of Emergency Services (800) 852-7550 What is a Sewage Spill? You Are Responsible for a Sewage Spill Caused by a Blockage or Break in Your Sewer Lines! Gre ase builds up insid e and eventually blocks sewer pipes. Grease gets into the sewer from food establishments, household drains, as well as from poorly maintained commercial grease traps and interceptors. Structure problems caused by tree roots in the lines, broken/cracked pipes, missing or broken cleanout caps or undersized sewers can cause blockages. Infiltration and inflow (I/I) impacts pipe capacity and is caused when groundwater or rainwater enters the sew e r s ystem thr o ugh pi pe defects an d ill e gal connections. Time is of the essence in dealing with sewage spills. You are required to immediately: Control and minimize the spill. Keep spills contained on private property and out of gutters, storm drains and public waterways by shutting off or not using the water. Use sandbags, dirt and/or plastic sheeting to prevent sewage from entering the storm drain system. Clear the sewer blockage. Always wear gloves and wash your hands. It is recommended that a plumbing professional be called for clearing blockages and making necessary repairs. Always notify your city sewer/public works department or public sewer district of sewage spills. If the spill enters the storm drains also notify the Health Care Agency. In addition, if it exceeds 1,000 gallons notify the Office of Emergency Services. Refer to the numbers listed in this brochure. Caution Allowing sewage from your home, business or property to discharge to a gutter or storm drain may subject you to penalties and/or out-of-pocket costs to reimburse cities or public agencies for clean-up and enforcement efforts. See Regulatory Codes & Fines section for pertinent codes and fines that apply. What to Look For You Could Be Liable Sewage spills can be a very noticeable gushing of water from a manhole or a slow water leak that may take time to be noticed. Don’t dismiss unaccounted-for wet areas. Look for: !Drain backups inside the building. !Wet ground and water leaking around manhole lids onto your street. !Leaking water from cleanouts or outside drains. !Unusual odorous wet areas: sidewalks, external walls or ground/landscape around a building. Rev 4/06 printed on recycled paper Common Causes of Sewage Spills Overflowing cleanout pipe located on private property Keep people and pets away from the affected area. Untreated sewage has high levels of disease-causing viruses and bacteria. Call your local health care agency listed on the back for more information. DTP113 Sewage spills occur when the wastewater being transported via underground pipes overflows through a manhole, cleanout or broken pipe. Sewage spills can cause health hazards, damage to homes and businesses, and threaten the environment, local waterways and beaches. Health Care Agency Environmental Health C A AILI NFOR FO OYRTAN NGUEOCIf You See a Sewage Spill Occurring, Notify Your City Sewer/Public Works Department or Public Sewer District IMMEDIATELY! www.ocwatersheds.com P R O J E C T P R E V E N T I O N Residences Businesses Homeowner/Condominium Associations Federal and State Complexes Military Facilities Orange County Sanitation District How a Sewer System Works Orange County Agency Responsibilites You Could Be Liable for Not Protecting the Environment Local and state agencies have legal jurisdic- tion and enforcement authority to ensure that sewage spills are remedied. They may respond and assist with contain- m ent , reliev ing p ip e blo c k age s , a n d/o r clean-up of the sewage spill, especially if the spill is flowing into storm drains or onto public property. A property owner may be charged for c o s t s i nc urr ed b y t h e se ag en cie s re s p o n d i n g to s pi l l s f r o m p r i v a t e properties . How You Can Prevent Sewage Spills A property owner's sewer pipes are called service laterals and are connected to larger local main and regional trunk lines. Service laterals run from the connection at the home to the connection with the public sewer (including the area under the street). These laterals are the responsibility of the property owner and must be maintained by the property owner. Many city agencies h a v e a d o p t e d o r di n a n c e s r e q u i r i n g maintenance of service laterals. Check with y o ur c i ty s e w er /lo c a l p u b l i c w o r k s department for more information. Operation and maintenance of local and regional sewer lines are the responsi- bility of the city sewer/public works depart- ments and public sewer districts. Preventing Grease Blockages The drain is not a dump! Recycle or dispose of grease properly and never pour grease down the drain. Homeowners should mix fats, oils and grease with absor- bent waste materials such as paper, coffee grounds, or kitty litter and place it in the trash. Wipe food scraps from plates and pans and dump them in the trash. Restaurants and commercial food service establishments should always use “Kitchen Best Management Practices.” These include: !Collecting all cooking grease and liquid oil from pots, pans and fryers in covered grease containers for recycling. !Scraping or dry-wiping excess food and grease from dishes, pots, pans and fryers into the trash. !Installing drain screens on all kitchen drains. !Having spill kits readily available for cleaning up spills. !Properly maintaining grease traps or interceptors by having them serviced regularly. Check your local city codes. !City Sewer/Public Works Departments— R e s p o n s i b l e f o r p r o t e c t i n g c i t y p r o p e r t y and streets, the local storm drain system, sewage collection system and other public areas. !P u b l i c S e w e r /S a n i t a t i o n D i s t r i c t — Responsible for collecting, treating and disposing of wastewater. !County of Orange Health Care Agency— Responsible for protecting public health by closing ocean/bay waters and may close food-service businesses if a spill poses a threat to public health. !Regional Water Quality Control Boards— Responsible for protecting State waters. !Orange Cou n ty Sto rmwat e r Progr a m— Responsible for preventing harmful pollutants from being discharged or washed by stormwater runoff into the municipal storm drain system, creeks, bays and the ocean. 2 3 1 Never put grease down garbage disposals, drains or toilets. P e r f o r m p e r i o d i c c l e a n i n g t o eliminate grease, debris and roots in your service laterals. R e p a ir any s t ru ct u r a l p r o b l ems in your sewer system and eliminate any ra i n w a ter i n f ilt r a ti o n /i n f low leaks into your service laterals. Sewage spills can cause damage to the environment. Help prevent them! Regional Trunk line Sewer Wastewater Treatment Plant Cleanout CleanoutGrease Trap Downspout (rain water goes into the storm drain system, not the sewer) RESIDENCE BUSINESS Manhole Local Main Sewer Line Private Service Laterals Manhole City Sewer/Public Works Departments Aliso Viejo .........................(949) 425-2500 Anaheim...........................(714) 765-6860 Brea ..............................(714) 990-7691 Buena Park ........................(714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa ........................(949) 645-8400 Cypress ...........................(714) 229-6760 Dana Point .........................(949) 248-3562 Fountain Valley .....................(714) 593-4600 Fullerton...........................(714) 738-6897 Garden Grove .......................(714) 741-5375 Huntington Beach ...................(714) 536-5921 Irvine .............................(949) 453-5300 Laguna Beach ......................(949) 497-0765 Laguna Hills ........................(949) 707-2650 Laguna Niguel ......................(949) 362-4337 Laguna Woods ......................(949) 639-0500 La Habra...........................(562) 905-9792 Lake Forest ....................(949) 461-3480 La Palma ..........................(714) 690-3310 Los Alamitos .......................(562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo .......................(949) 831-2500 Newport Beach .....................(949) 644-3011 Orange ............................(714) 532-6480 Orange County ......................(714) 567-6363 Placentia ..........................(714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita ............(949) 635-1800 San Clemente.......................(949) 366-1553 San Juan Capistrano ................(949) 443-6363 Santa Ana .........................(714) 647-3380 Seal Beach.........................(562) 431-2527 Stanton ...........................(714) 379-9222 Tustin .............................(714) 962-2411 Villa Park ..........................(714) 998-1500 Westminster .......................(714) 893-3553 Yorba Linda ........................(714) 961-7170 Public Sewer/Water Districts Costa Mesa Sanitary District ..........(714) 393-4433/ (949) 645-8400 El Toro Water District ................(949) 837-0660 Emerald Bay Service District ..........(949) 494-8571 Garden Grove Sanitary District .........(714) 741-5375 Irvine Ranch Water District ............(949) 453-5300 Los Alamitos/Rossmoor Sewer District ...(562) 431-2223 Midway City Sanitary District (Westminster)(714) 893-3553 Moulton Niguel Water District .........(949) 831-2500 Orange County Sanitation District.......(714) 962-2411 Santa Margarita Water District ........(949) 459-6420 South Coast Water District ............(949) 499-4555 South Orange County Wastewater Authority (949) 234-5400 Sunset Beach Sanitary District .........(562) 493-9932 Trabuco Canyon Sanitary District .......(949) 858-0277 Yorba Linda Water District ............(714) 777-3018 Other Agencies Orange County Health Care Agency .....(714) 433-6419 Office of Emergency Services ..........(800) 852-7550 Report Sewage Spills! For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com UCCE Master Gardener Hotline: (714) 708-1646 To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. The tips contained in this brochure provide useful information to help prevent water pollution while landscaping or gardening. If you have other suggestions, please contact your city’s stormwater representatives or call the Orange County Stormwater Program. C lean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities can lead to water pollution if you’re not careful. Fertilizers, pesticides and other chemicals that are left on yards or driveways can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Overwatering lawns can also send materials into storm drains. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour gardening products into the ocean, so don’t let them enter the storm drains. Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Printed on Recycled Paper Tips for Landscape and GardeningTips for Landscape & Gardening Never allow gardening products or polluted water to enter the street, gutter or storm drain. General Landscaping Tips Protect stockpiles and materials from wind and rain by storing them under tarps or secured plastic sheeting. Prevent erosion of slopes by planting fast-growing, dense ground covering plants. These will shield and bind the soil. Plant native vegetation to reduce the amount of water, fertilizers, and pesticide applied to the landscape. Never apply pesticides or fertilizers when rain is predicted within the next 48 hours. Garden & Lawn Maintenance Do not overwater. Use irrigation practices such as drip irrigation, soaker hoses or micro spray systems. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers. Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of green waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or recycling it through your city’s program. Use slow-release fertilizers to minimize leaching, and use organic fertilizers. Read labels and use only as directed. Do not over-apply pesticides or fertilizers. Apply to spots as needed, rather than blanketing an entire area. Store pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals in a dry covered area to prevent exposure that may result in the deterioration of containers and packaging. Rinse empty pesticide containers and re-use rinse water as you would use the product. Do not dump rinse water down storm drains. Dispose of empty containers in the trash. When available, use non-toxic alternatives to traditional pesticides, and use pesticides specifically designed to control the pest you are targeting. For more information, visit www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. If fertilizer is spilled, sweep up the spill before irrigating. If the spill is liquid, apply an absorbent material such as cat litter, and then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash. Take unwanted pesticides to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center to be recycled. Locations are provided below. Household Hazardous Waste Collection Centers Anaheim: 1071 N. Blue Gum St. Huntington Beach: 17121 Nichols St. Irvine: 6411 Oak Canyon San Juan Capistrano: 32250 La Pata Ave. For more information, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com Ayude a prevenir la contaminación del océano For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com Report sewage spills and discharges that are not contained to your site to the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) For emergencies, dial 911. Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Tips for the Food Service IndustryClean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. Fats, oils and grease from restaurants and food service facilities can cause sewer line blockages that may result in sewage overflow into your facility and into storm drains. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways and should never contain washwater, trash, grease or other materials. You would never dump oil and trash into the ocean, so don’t let it enter the storm drains. Follow these tips to help prevent water pollution. The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Printed on Recycled Paper Best Kitchen Practices Food Waste Disposal Scrape food waste off of plates, utensils, pots, food preparation and cooking areas and dispose of it in the trash. Never put food waste down the drain. Food scraps often contain grease, which can clog sewer pipes and result in sewage backups and overflows. Grease & Oil Disposal Never put oil or grease down the drain. Contain grease and oil by using covered grease storage containers or installing a grease interceptor. Never overfill your grease storage container or transport it without a cover. Grease control devices must be emptied and cleaned by permitted companies. Keep maintenance records on site. For a list of oil/grease recycling companies, contact the CIWMB at www. ciwmb.ca.gov/foodwaste/render.htm or contact your local sanitation district. Minor Spill Cleanup Always use dry cleanup methods, such as a rag, damp mop or broom. Never hose a spill into the street, gutter or storm drain. Dumpster Cleanup Pick up all debris around the dumpster. Always keep the lid on the dumpster closed. Never pour liquids into the dumpster or hose it out. Floor Mat Cleaning Sweep the floor mats regularly, discarding the debris into the trash. Hose off the mats in a mop sink, at a floor drain, or in an outdoor area that can contain the water. Never hose the mats in an area where the wastewater can flow to the street, gutter or storm drain. Washwater Disposal Dispose of washwater in a mop sink or an area with a floor drain. Never dispose of washwater in the street, gutter or storm drain. Major Spill Cleanup Have spill containment and clean- up kits readily available, and train all employees on how to use them. Immediately contain and clean the spill using dry methods. If the spill leaves your site, call 1-877-897-7455. For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door PROJECT PREVENTION Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Preventing water pollution at your commercial/industrial site Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many landscape and building maintenance activities can lead to water pollution if you’re not careful. Paint, chemicals, plant clippings and other materials can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour soap or fertilizers into the ocean, so why would you let them enter the storm drains? Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Some types of industrial facilities are required to obtain coverage under the State General Industrial Permit. For more information visit: www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwater/industrial.html Printed on Recycled Paper Tips for Pool Maintenance Call your trash hauler to replace leaking dumpsters. Do not dump any toxic substance or liquid waste on the pavement, the ground, or near a storm drain. Even materials that seem harmless such as latex paint or biodegradable cleaners can damage the environment. Recycle paints, solvents and other materials. For more information about recycling and collection centers, visit www.oclandfills.com. Store materials indoors or under cover and away from storm drains. Use a construction and demolition recycling company to recycle lumber, paper, cardboard, metals, masonry, carpet, plastic, pipes, drywall, rocks, dirt, and green waste. For a listing of construction and demolition recycling locations in your area, visit www.ciwmb.ca.gov/recycle. Properly label materials. Familiarize employees with Material Safety Data Sheets. Landscape Maintenance Compost grass clippings, leaves, sticks and other vegetation, or dispose of it at a permitted landfill or in green waste containers. Do not dispose of these materials in the street, gutter or storm drain. Irrigate slowly and inspect the system for leaks, overspraying and runoff. Adjust automatic timers to avoid overwatering. Follow label directions for the use and disposal of fertilizers and pesticides. Do not apply pesticides or fertilizers if rain is expected within 48 hours or if wind speeds are above 5 mph. Do not spray pesticides within 100 feet of waterways. Fertilizers should be worked into the soil rather than dumped onto the surface. If fertilizer is spilled on the pavement or sidewalk, sweep it up immediately and place it back in the container. Building Maintenance Never allow washwater, sweepings or sediment to enter the storm drain. Sweep up dry spills and use cat litter, towels or similar materials to absorb wet spills. Dispose of it in the trash. If you wash your building, sidewalk or parking lot, you must contain the water. Use a shop vac to collect the water and contact your city or sanitation agency for proper disposal information. Do not let water enter the street, gutter or storm drain. Use drop cloths underneath outdoor painting, scraping, and sandblasting work, and properly dispose of materials in the trash. Use a ground cloth or oversized tub for mixing paint and cleaning tools. Use a damp mop or broom to clean floors. Cover dumpsters to keep insects, animals, rainwater and sand from entering. Keep the area around the dumpster clear of trash and debris. Do not overfill the dumpster. PROJECT PREVENTION Proper Maintenance Practices for your Business Never Dispose of Anything in the Storm Drain. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 28 Appendix C: BMP Details 2013 ADS, INC. ADS RETENTION/DETENTION PIPE SYSTEM SPECIFICATION SCOPE THIS SPECIFICATION DESCRIBES ADS RETENTION/DETENTION PIPE SYSTEMS FOR USE IN NON-PRESSURE GRAVITY-FLOW STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS UTILIZING A CONTINUOUS OUTFALL STRUCTURE. PIPE REQUIREMENTS ADS RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS MAY UTILIZE ANY OF THE VARIOUS PIPE PRODUCTS BELOW: x N-12 STIB PIPE (PER AASHTO) SHALL MEET AASHTO M 294, TYPE S OR ASTM F2306 x N-12 STIB PIPE (PER ASTM F2648) SHALL MEET ASTM F2648 x N-12 MEGA GREEN STIB SHALL MEET ASTM F2648 ALL PRODUCTS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH INTERIOR AND ANNULAR EXTERIOR CORRUGATIONS. ALL STIB PIPE PRODUCTS ARE AVAILABLE AS PERFORATED OR NON-PERFORATED. WTIB PIPE PRODUCTS ARE ONLY AVAILABLE AS NON-PERFORATED. PRODUCT-SPECIFIC PIPE SPECIFICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE DRAINAGE HANDBOOK SECTION 1 "SPECIFICATIONS". JOINT PERFORMANCE PLAIN END / SOIL-TIGHT (STIB): STIB PIPE SHALL BE JOINED USING A BELL AND SPIGOT JOINT. THE BELL AND SPIGOT JOINT SHALL MEET THE SOIL-TIGHT REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306 AND GASKETS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F477. PLAIN END PIPE AND FITTINGS CONNECTIONS SHALL BE JOINED WITH COUPLING BANDS COVERING AT LEAST TWO FULL CORRUGATIONS ON EACH END OF THE PIPE. GASKETED SOIL-TIGHT COUPLING BAND CONNECTIONS SHALL INCORPORATE A CLOSED-CELL SYNTHETIC EXPANDED RUBBER GASKET MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D1056 GRADE 2A2. GASKETS, WHEN APPLICABLE, SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER. FITTINGS FITTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM F2306 AND MEET JOINT PERFORMANCE INDICATED ABOVE FOR FITTINGS CONNECTIONS. CUSTOM FITTINGS ARE AVAILABLE AND MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL INSTALLATION CRITERION. INSTALLATION INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321 AND ADS RECOMMENDED INSTALLATION GUIDELINES, WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT MINIMUM COVER IN NON-TRAFFIC AREAS FOR 12-60 INCH (300-1500 mm) DIAMETERS SHALL BE 1 FT (0.3 m). MINIMUM COVER IN TRAFFICKED AREAS FOR 12-36 INCH (300-900 mm) DIAMETERS SHALL BE 1 FT (0.3 m) AND FOR 42-60 INCH (1050-1500 mm) DIAMETERS, THE MINIMUM COVER SHALL BE 2 FT (0.6 m). BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF CLASS I (COMPACTED) OR CLASS II (MINIMUM 95% SPD) MATERIAL, WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT 60 INCH (1500 mm) SYSTEMS SHALL USE CLASS I MATERIAL ONLY. MINIMUM COVER HEIGHTS DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR PIPE BUOYANCY. REFER TO ADS TECHNICAL NOTE 5.05 "PIPE FLOTATION" FOR BUOYANCY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS. MAXIMUM COVER OVER SYSTEM USING STANDARD BACKFILL IS 8 FT (2.4 m); CONTACT A REPRESENTATIVE WHEN MAXIMUM FILL HEIGHT MAY BE EXCEEDED. ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS ARE PROVIDED IN THE DRAINAGE HANDBOOK SECTION 6 "RETENTION/DETENTION". ADS RECOMMENDS THE USE OF "FLEXSTORM CATCH IT" INSERTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL INLETS TO PROTECT THE SUBSURFACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF. NOTES: 1)ALL ELEVATIONS, DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF RISERS, INLETS AND OUTLETS, SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO RELEASING FOR FABRICATION. 2)IN SITUATIONS WHERE A FINE-GRAINED BACKFILL MATERIAL IS USED ADJACENT TO THE PIPE SYSTEM, AND ESPECIALLY INVOLVING GROUND WATER CONDITIONS, CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE USE OF GASKETED PIPE JOINTS. AT THE VERY LEAST THE PIPE JOINTS SHOULD BE WRAPPED IN A SUITABLE, NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO PREVENT INFILTRATION OF FINES INTO THE PIPE SYSTEM. 3)CONSIDERATION FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LOADS MUST BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. 4)ALL PIPE DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURERS TOLERANCES. 5)ALL RISERS TO BE FIELD EXTENDED OR TRIMMED TO FINAL GRADE. THE UNDERSIGNED HERBY APPROVES THE ATTACHED PAGES. CUSTOMER TM DATE PROJECT INFORMATION ADS SALES REP PROJECT NO. ALLAN WARBRICK 760-330-0746 ALLAN.WARBRICK@ADS-PIPE.COM S134619 ENGINEERED PRODUCT MANAGER TERENCE ZHAO 626-425-2874 TERENCE.ZHAO@ADS-PIPE.COM PARK PLAZA ORANGE, CALIFORNIA ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. R ITEM QTY ALT. QTY PART #DESCRIPTION STAN.VENDOR NOTE 1 1 4298ANC-1 42".MANIFOLD 90 DEG BEND COMP ADS SEE DETAIL 1-1 1 0806AN 8".FAB STUB STAN ADS COMPONENT 2 1 4298AN 42".MANIFOLD 90 DEG BEND STAN ADS SEE DETAIL 3 2 CAP-1 42".END CAP CUST ADS SEE DETAIL 4 4 STICKS 79 LF 42810020IB 42".N12 HWY.STIB.PERF.20'STAN ADS AS SHOWN 5 3 STICKS 49 LF 42810020IB 42".N12 HWY.STIB.PERF.20'STAN ADS FIELD CUT 6 5 4265AA 42".SPLIT COUPLER.(50/PALLET)STAN ADS NOT SHOWN 7 1 ROLLS 356 SY 0601TG 601.15' X 300'.(500 SY).(NTPEP SCAN) (20% OVERAGE)STAN ADS SEE DETAIL 8 177 TONS 126 CY BY OTHERS STONE (0% OVERAGE)NA BY OTHERS NOT SHOWN 9 4695 CF 174 CY NA EXCAVATION NA NA NOT SHOWN SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 430261-800-733-7473ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.RREVDRWCHKDESCRIPTIONPARK PLAZAORANGE, CALIFORNIA05-30-19KRS134619WCM2 5 NOTES THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST REVIEW ELEVATIONS AND IF NECESSARY ADJUST GRADING TO ENSURE THE PIPE COVER REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. STUB SIZES AND INVERTS TO BE VERIFIED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO FABRICATION. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST REVIEW THE PROXIMITY OF THE PIPE TO THE BUILDING/STRUCTURE. NO FOUNDATION LOADS SHALL BE TRANSMITTED TO THE PIPE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST CONSIDER EFFECTS OF POSSIBLE SATURATED SOILS ON BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS AND SEEPAGE INTO BASEMENTS.HDPE N-1242" STIB PERFRETENTION SYSTEM69.8' 72.8' 18" (TYP EXCAVATION LIMITS)13.0'10.0'20'10'0ADS GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ENCASEMENT REQUIRED (SEE DETAIL / TYP 2 PLACES) 2 55 55 44 44 3 3 1 CLASS I BACKFILL THROUGHOUT SYSTEM NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION: THIS LAYOUT IS FOR DIMENSIONAL PURPOSES ONLY TO PROVE CONCEPT & THE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME CAN BE ACHIEVED ON SITE. SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 430261-800-733-7473ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.RREVDRWCHKDESCRIPTIONPARK PLAZAORANGE, CALIFORNIA05-30-19KRS134619WCM3 5HDPE N-1242" STIB PERFRETENTION SYSTEM42" X 90 MANIFOLD BEND [4298AN] 2 1 4298AN ITEM #: QTY: 36" 36" 59.8" 59.8" 42" CAP 3 2 CAP-1 ITEM #: QTY: 15.4" 42" 3/4" THICK REINFORCED WELDED END PLATE 42" X 90 MANIFOLD BEND [4298AN] W/ 8" STUB [0806AN] 1 1 4298ANC-1 ITEM #: QTY: 36" 36" 59.8" 59.8" 12" 8" ECC HIGH HDPE STUB SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 430261-800-733-7473ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.RREVDRWCHKDESCRIPTIONPARK PLAZAORANGE, CALIFORNIA05-30-19KRS134619WCM4 5 H (GRASS AREA) X H (FLEX PVMT) H (RIGID PVMT) C FILTER FABRIC (WHERE REQUIRED BY ENGINEER) FINAL FILL MATERIAL (PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS) SUITABLE FOUNDATION UNDISTURBED EARTH N O N -TR AF F IC IN ST A LLAT IO N TR A F FI C INST A LLAT IO N ~~ NOMINAL DIAMETER TYPICAL SIDE WALL "X" MIN. H (NON-TRAFFIC) MIN. H (TRAFFIC) NOMINAL O.D. TYPICAL SPACING "C"MAX. H* CLASS I MATERIAL PLACED AND COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321 IN PIPE ZONE 42" (1050 mm) 18" (457 mm) 48" (1219 mm) 72" (1829 mm) 8' (2.4 m) 24" (610 mm) 12" (305 mm) BEDDING (CLASS I MATERIAL) = 6" (152 mm) MIN. FOR 42" (1050 mm) PIPE * MAXIMUM FILL HEIGHTS OVER MANIFOLD FITTINGS. CONTACT MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR INSTALLATION CONSIDERATIONS WHEN COVER EXCEEDS 8 FT (2.4 m). NOTES: 1. ALL REFERENCES TO CLASS I MATERIAL ARE PER ASTM D2321 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPE FOR SEWERS AND OTHER GRAVITY FLOW APPLICATIONS", LATEST EDITION. 2. ALL RETENTION AND DETENTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION AND THE MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. 3. MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE MIGRATION OF NATIVE FINES INTO THE BACKFILL MATERIAL, WHEN REQUIRED. SEE ASTM D2321. 4. FILTER FABRIC: A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER TO PREVENT THE MIGRATION OF FINES FROM THE NATIVE SOIL INTO THE SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL. 5. FOUNDATION: WHERE THE TRENCH BOTTOM IS UNSTABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE TO A DEPTH REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER AND REPLACE WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. AS AN ALTERNATIVE AND AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER, THE TRENCH BOTTOM MAY BE STABILIZED USING A GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL. 6. BEDDING: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY THE ENGINEER, MINIMUM BEDDING THICKNESS SHALL BE 4" (102 mm) FOR 4"-24" (100-600 mm); 6" (152 mm) FOR 30-60" (750-900 mm). 7. INITIAL BACKFILL: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I IN THE PIPE ZONE EXTENDING NOT LESS THAN 6" (152 mm) ABOVE CROWN OF PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER. MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION. 8. COVER: MINIMUM COVER OVER ALL RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS IN NON-TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS (GRASS OR LANDSCAPE AREAS) IS 12" (305 mm) FROM TOP OF PIPE TO GROUND SURFACE. ADDITIONAL COVER MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT FLOATATION. FOR TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS, MINIMUM COVER IS 12" (305 mm) UP TO 36" (900 mm) DIAMETER PIPE AND 24" (610 mm) OF COVER FOR 42-60" (1050-1500 mm) DIAMETER PIPE, MEASURED FROM TOP OF PIPE TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR TO TOP OF RIGID PAVEMENT. MAXIMUM FILL HEIGHT LIMITED TO 8 FT (2.4 m) OVER FITTINGS FOR STANDARD INSTALLATIONS. CONTACT A SALES REPRESENTATIVE WHEN MAXIMUM FILL HEIGHTS EXCEED 8 FT (2.4 m) FOR INSTALLATION CONSIDERATIONS.HDPE N-1242" STIB PERFRETENTION SYSTEM SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 430261-800-733-7473ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.RREVDRWCHKDESCRIPTIONPARK PLAZAORANGE, CALIFORNIA05-30-19KRS134619WCM5 5 NOTE: CLSM/SLURRY/FLOWABLE FILL MUST EXTEND 12" (305 mm) MINIMUM PAST ALL JOINTS AND FITTINGS TO BE ENCASED. MANIFOLD DETAIL RISER DETAIL ENCASEMENT (MINIMUM UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 100 psi OR AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER) NYLOPLAST RISER EXTENSION NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN HDPE PIPE ENCASEMENT (MINIMUM UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 100 psi OR AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER) *INSITU BACKFILL (COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY) ENCASEMENT (MINIMUM UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 100 psi OR AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER)NYLOPLAST FRAME AND GRATE/SOLID COVER (FOR PER LOADING CONDITION ONLY) ENCASE IN-LINE DRAIN BELL 6" (152 mm) TOP SOIL 30" (762 mm) RISER 8' (2.4 m) TRAFFIC NON-TRAFFIC HDPE N-1242" STIB PERFRETENTION SYSTEM STANDARD DETAIL STORMWATER BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM MWS-L-4-15-5'-1"-V GENERAL NOTES INSTALLATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC DATA PLAN VIEW ELEVATION VIEW RIGHT END VIEW LEFT END VIEW INTERNAL BYPASS DISCLOSURE: TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-5 December 20, 2013 HSC-2: Impervious Area Dispersion Impervious area dispersion refers to the practice of routing runoff from impervious areas, such as rooftops, walkways, and patios onto the surface of adjacent pervious areas. Runoff is dispersed uniformly via splash block or dispersion trench and soaks into the ground as it move slowly across the surface of pervious areas. Minor ponding may occur, but it is not the intent of this practice to actively promote localized on-lot storage (See HSC-1: Localized On-Lot Infiltration). Feasibility Screening Considerations Impervious area dispersion can be used where infiltration would otherwise be infeasible, however dispersion depth over landscaped areas should be limited by site-specific conditions to prevent standing water or geotechnical issues. Opportunity Criteria Rooftops and other low traffic impervious surface present in drainage area. Soils are adequate for infiltration. If not, soils can be amended to improve capacity to absorb dispersed water (see MISC-2: Amended Soils). Significant pervious area present in drainage area with shallow slope Overflow from pervious area can be safely managed. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Soils should be preserved from their natural condition or restored via soil amendments to meet minimum criteria described in Section . □ A minimum of 1 part pervious area capable of receiving flow should be provided for every 2 parts of impervious area disconnected. □ The pervious area receiving flow should have a slope ≤ 2 percent and path lengths of ≥ 20 feet per 1000 sf of impervious area. □ Dispersion areas should be maintained to remove trash and debris, loose vegetation, and protect any areas of bare soil from erosion. □ Velocity of dispersed flow should not be greater than 0.5 ft per second to avoid scour. Calculating HSC Retention Volume The retention volume provided by downspout dispersion is a function of the ratio of impervious to pervious area and the condition of soils in the pervious area. Determine flow patterns in pervious area and estimate footprint of pervious area receiving dispersed flow. Calculate the ratio of pervious to impervious area. Check soil conditions using the soil condition design criteria below; amend if necessary. Look up the storm retention depth, dHSC from the chart below. Simple Downspout Dispersion Source: toronto.ca/environment/water.htm Also known as: Downspout disconnection Impervious area disconnection Sheet flow dispersion TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-6 December 20, 2013 The max dHSC is equal to the design storm depth for the project site. Soil Condition Design Criteria □ Maximum slope of 2 percent □ Well-established lawn or landscaping □ Minimum soil amendments per criteria in MISC-2: Amended Soils. Configuration for Use in a Treatment Train Impervious area disconnection is an HSC that may be used as the first element in any treatment train The use of impervious area disconnection reduces the sizing requirement for downstream LID and/or treatment control BMPs Additional References for Design Guidance SMC LID Manual (pp 131) http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/guest75/pub/All_Projects/SoCal_LID_Manual/SoCalL ID_Manual_FINAL_040910.pdf City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services. 2010. How to manage stormwater – Disconnect Downspouts. http://www.portlandonline.com/bes/index.cfm?c=43081&a=177702 Seattle Public Utility: http://www.cityofseattle.org/util/stellent/groups/public/@spu/@usm/documents/webcontent/sp u01_006395.pdf Thurston County, Washington State (pp 10): http://www.co.thurston.wa.us/stormwater/manual/docs-faqs/DG-5-Roof-Runoff- Control_Rev11Jan24.pdf 1 Pervious area used in calculation should only include the pervious area receiving flow, not pervious area receiving only direct rainfall or upslope pervious drainage. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 29 Appendix D: BMP Maintenance Information MWS – Linear Hybrid Stormwater Filtration System MAINTENANCE Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. www.modularwetlands.com P.O. Box 869 P 760-433-7640 Oceanside, CA 92049 F 760-433-3179 MAINTENANCE Maintenance Summary – o Clean Bio Clean® Catch Basin Filter – average maintenance interval is 3 to 6 months. (15 minute service time). o Clean Separation (sediment) Chamber – average maintenance interval is 6 to 18 months. (30 minute service time). o Replace Cartridge Filter Media (BioMediaGREEN™) – average maintenance interval 6 – 12 months. (45 minute service time). o Replace Drain Down Filter Media (BioMediaGREEN™) – average maintenance interval is 6 to 12 months. (5 minute service time). o Trim Vegetations – average maintenance interval is 3 to 6 months. (15 minute service time). o Evaluate Wetland Media Flow Hydraulic Conductivity – average inspection interval is once per year. (5 minute inspection time). o Wetland Media Replacement – average maintenance interval is 5 to 20 years. (6 hours). For more information on maintenance procedures, to order replacement media or find an authorized service company please contact: Modular Wetland Systems, Inc 2972 San Luis Rey Road Oceanside, CA 92058 Phone: 760-433-7640 Fax: 760-433-3176 Email: info@modularwetlands.com System Diagram – Discharge Chamber Wetland Biofiltration Chamber Pre-Treatment Chamber Access to drain down filter and flow valves Access to screening device, sediment chamber and cartridge filter Maintenance Overview – A. Every installed MWS – Linear unit is to be maintained by the Supplier, or a Supplier approved contractor. The cost of this service varies among providers. B. The MWS – Linear is a multi-stage self-contained treatment train for stormwater treatment. Each stage protects subsequent stages from clogging. Stages include: screening, separation, cartridge media filtration, and biofiltration. The biofiltration stage contains various types of vegetation which will require annual evaluation and trimming. 1. Clean Bio Clean® Catch Basin Filter – Screening is provided by well proven catch basin filter. The filter has a trash and sediment capacity of 2 (curb type) and 4 (grate type) cubic feet. The filter removes gross solids, including litter, and sediments greater than 200 microns. This procedure is easily done by hand or with a small industrial vacuum device. This filter is located directly under the manhole or grate access cover. 2. Clean Separation (sediment) Chamber – separation occurs in the pre- treatment chamber located directly under the curb or grated inlet. This chamber has a capacity of approximately 21 cubic feet for trash, debris and sediments. This chamber targets TSS, and particulate metals and nutrients. This procedure can be performed with a standard vacuum truck. This chamber is located directly under the manhole or grate access cover. 3. Replace Cartridge Filter Media (BioMediaGREEN™) – Primary filtration is provided by a horizontal flow cartridge filter utilizing BioMediaGREEN blocks. Each cartridge has a media surface area of 35 square feet. The large surface area will insure long term operation without clogging. The cartridge filter with BioMediaGREEN targets fine TSS, metals, nutrients, hydrocarbons, turbidity and bacteria. Media life depends on local loading conditions and can easily be replaced and disposed of without any equipment. The filters are located in the pre-treatment chamber. Entry into chamber required to replace BioMediaGREEN blocks. Each cartridge contain 14 pieces of 20” tall BioMediaGREEN. 4. Replace Drain Down Filter Media (BioMediaGREEN™) – A drain down filter, similar in function to the perimeter filter is located in the discharge chamber. This filter allows standing water to be drained and filtered out of the separation chamber. This addresses any vector issues, by eliminating all standing water within this system. Replacement of media takes approximately 5 minutes and is performed without any equipment. 5. Trim Vegetations – The system utilizes multiple plants in the biofiltration chamber to provide enhanced treatment for dissolved pollutants including nutrients and metals. The vegetation will need to be maintained (trimmed) as needed. This can be done as part of the project normal landscape maintenance. NO FERTILIZER SHALL BE USED IN THIS CHAMBER. 6. Evaluate Wetland Media Flow Hydraulic Conductivity – The systems flow can be assessed from the discharge chamber. This should be done during a rain event. By viewing into the discharge chamber the flow out of the system can be observed. If little to know flow is observed from the lower valve or orifice plate this is a sign of potential wetland media (biofiltration) maintenance needs. 7. Wetland Media Replacement – biofiltration is provided by an advance horizontal flow vegetated wetland. This natural filter contains a mix of sorptive media that supports abundant plant life. This biofilter targets the finest TSS, dissolved nutrients, dissolved metals, organics, pesticides, oxygen demanding substances and bacteria. This filter provides the final polishing step of treatment. If prior treatment stages are properly maintained, the life of this media can be up to 20 years. Replacement of the media is simple. Removal of spent media can be done with a shovel of a vacuum truck. C. The MWS – Linear catch basin filter, separation chamber, cartridge filter media and wetland media are designed to allow for the use of vacuum removal of captured pollutants and spent filter media by centrifugal compressor vacuum units without causing damage to the filter or during normal cleaning and maintenance. Filter and chambers can be cleaned from finish surface through standard manhole or grate access. Maintenance Procedures – 1. Clean Bio Clean® Catch Basin Filter – Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. recommends the catch basin filter be inspected and cleaned a minimum of once every six months and replacement of hydrocarbon booms once a year. The procedure is easily done with the use of any standard vacuum truck. This procedure takes approximately 15 minutes. 1. Remove grate or manhole to gain access to catch basin filter insert. Remove the deflector shield (grate type only) with the hydrocarbon boom attached. Where possible the maintenance should be performed from the ground surface. Note: entry into an underground stormwater vault such as an inlet vault requires certification in confined space training. 2. Remove all trash, debris, organics, and sediments collected by the inlet filter insert. Removal of the trash and debris can be done manually or with the use of a vacuum truck. The hose of the vacuum truck will not damage the screen of the filter. 3. Evaluation of the hydrocarbon boom shall be performed at each cleaning. If the boom is filled with hydrocarbons and oils it should be replaced. Attach new boom to basket with plastic ties through pre-drilled holes in basket. Place the deflector shield (grate type only) back into the filter. 4. Transport all debris, trash, organics and sediments to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. 5. The hydrocarbon boom may be classified as hazardous material and will have to be picked up and disposed of as hazardous waste. Hazardous material can only be handled by a certified hazardous waste trained person (minimum 24- hour hazwoper). 2. Clean Separation (sediment) Chamber – Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. recommends the separation chamber be inspected and cleaned a minimum of once a year. The procedure is easily done with the use of any standard vacuum truck. This procedure takes approximately 30 minutes. 1. Remove grate or manhole to gain access to the catch basin filter. 2. Remove catch basin filter. Where possible the maintenance should be performed from the ground surface. Note: entry into an underground stormwater vault such as an inlet vault requires certification in confined space training. 3. With a pressure washer spray down pollutants accumulated on walls and cartridge filters. 4. Vacuum out separation chamber and remove all accumulated debris and sediments. 5. Replace catch basin filter, replace grate or manhole cover. 6. Transport all debris, trash, organics and sediments to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. 3. Replace Cartridge Filter Media (BioMediaGREEN™) – Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. recommends the cartridge filters media be inspected and cleaned a minimum of once a year. The procedure will require prior maintenance of separation chamber. Replacement of media takes approximately 45 minutes. 1. Remove grate or manhole to gain access to the catch basin filter. 2. Remove catch basin filter. Where possible the maintenance should be performed from the ground surface. Note: entry into an underground stormwater vault such as an inlet vault requires certification in confined space training. 3. Enter separation chamber. 4. Unscrew the two ½” diameter bolts holding the lid on each cartridge filter and remove lid and place outside of unit. 5. Remove each of the 14 BioMediaGREEN filter blocks in each cartridge and remove from chamber for disposal. 6. Spray down the outside and inside of the cartridge filter to remove any accumulated sediments. 7. Replace with new BioMediaGREEN filter blocks insuring the blocks are properly lined up and seated in the bottom. 8. Replace the lid and tighten down bolts. 9. Replace catch basin filter, replace grate or manhole cover. 10. Transport all debris, trash, organics, spent media and sediments to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. 4. Replace Drain Down Filter Media (BioMediaGREEN™) – Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. recommends the drain down filter be inspected and maintained a minimum of once a year. Replacement of media takes approximately 5 minutes. 1. Open hatch of discharge chamber 2. Enter chamber, unlatch drain down filter cover. 3. Remove BioMediaGREEN filter block 4. Replace with new block, replace and latch cover. 5. Exit chamber, close and lock down the hatch. 6. Transport spent media to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. 5. Trim Vegetations – Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. recommends the plants/vegetation be inspected and maintained a minimum of once a year. It is also recommended that the plants receive the same care as other landscaped areas. Note: No fertilizer is to be used on this area.Trimming of vegetation takes approximately 15 minutes. 6. Evaluate Wetland Media Flow Hydraulic Conductivity – Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. recommends system flow be inspected and observed a minimum of once a year. This needs to be done during a rain event. Inspection and Observation takes approximately 5 minutes. 1. Open hatch of discharge chamber 2. Observe the level of flow from the bottom valve or orifice plate. 3. If flow is steady and high the system is operating normally. 4. If little or no flow is observed exiting the valve possible maintenance to the biofiltration wetland chamber may be needed. Contact Modular Wetlands for further assistance. 5. Exit chamber, close and lock down the hatch. 7. Wetland Media Replacement – Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. recommends the wetland media be replaced a minimum of one every 20 years. Inspection takes approximately 15 minutes. Replacement of rock media takes approximately 6 hours and requires a vacuum truck. 1. Remove plants from the wetland chamber. 2. Use a vacuum truck or shovel to remove all wetland media. 3. Spray down the walls and floor of the chamber and vacuum out any accumulated pollutants. 4. Spray down perforated piping and netting of flow matrix and the inflow and outflow end to remove any accumulated pollutants. 5. Vacuum out any standing water from the media removal and insure the chamber is cleaning. 6. Use a small backhoe to fill chamber with new media. Call Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. for media delivery information. 7. Install BioMediaGREEN filter blocks across over the entire filter bed. Fill with media until 9” from top. The install filter blocks which are 3” thick. Fill the top 6” inches with wetland media. 8. Plant new vegetation in the same configuration and quantity as old vegetation. Dig down until the BioMediaGREEN is exposed. Cut out a small circle of the BioMediaGREEN. Remove plant from container including soil ball and place in the whole cut out of the BioMediaGREEN. Cover up with wetland media. 9. Spray down the plants and media with water to saturate. 10. Continue supplemental irrigation (spray or drip) for at lest 90 days. 7. Other Maintenance Notes – 1. Following maintenance and/or inspection, the maintenance operator shall prepare a maintenance/inspection record. The record shall include any maintenance activities performed, amount and description of debris collected, and condition of the system and its various filter mechanism. . 2. The owner shall retain the maintenance/inspection record for a minimum of five years from the date of maintenance. These records shall be made available to the governing municipality for inspection upon request at any time. 3. Any person performing maintenance activities must have completed a minimum of OSHA 24-hour hazardous waste worker (hazwoper) training. 4. Remove access manhole lid or grate to gain access to filter screens and sediment chambers. Where possible the maintenance should be performed from the ground surface. Note: entry into an underground stormwater vault such as an inlet vault requires certification in confined space training. 5. Transport all debris, trash, organics and sediments to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. 6. The hydrocarbon boom is classified as hazardous material and will have to be picked up and disposed of as hazardous waste. Hazardous material can only be handled by a certified hazardous waste trained person (minimum 24-hour hazwoper). Maintenance Sequence – Access Pre-Treatment Chamber by Removing Manhole or Grate Cover Assess Pollutant Loading in Catch Basin Filter and Sediment Chamber Vacuum Catch Basin Filter Remove Catch Basin Filter Vacuum out the Sediment Chamber Enter Chamber Remove Lids of Cartridge Filters Remove Spent BioMediaGREEN Filter Blocks Spray Down and Clean Cartridge Filter Housing Replace with New BioMediaGREEN Filter Blocks and Replace Lid, then Catch Basin Filter and Replace Manhole or Grate Open Discharge Chamber Lid to Asses Wetland Media Flow Rate and Replace Drain Down Filter Near Bottom Please Contact Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. for More Information: 760-433-7640 info@modularwetlands.com Evaluate Vegetation and Trim if Needed. Maintenance Complete. Retention/Detention System Maintenance 1 TECHNICAL NOTE 4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026. (800) 821-6710 – www.ads-pipe.com ATN601 ©ADS 2007 TN 6.01 February 2007 This document is provided for informational purposes only and is meant only to be a guide. Individuals using this information should make their own decisions as to suitability of this guideline for their individual projects and adjust accordingly. Introduction A retention/detention system is comprised of a series of pipes and fittings that form an underground storage area, which retains or detains storm water runoff from a given area. As sediment and debris settle out of the detained stormwater, build up occurs that requires the system to be regularly inspected and cleaned in order for the system to perform as originally designed. The following provides the available fittings and guidelines for inspection and maintenance of an HDPE underground storage system. System Accessories and Fittings Concentric Reducers Concentric Reducers are fittings that transition between two pipes, either in line with one another or at perpendicular angles. The centerlines of the two pipes are at the same elevation. When a concentric reducer is used to connect the manifold pipe to the lateral pipes, most debris will be trapped in the manifold pipe. SIDE VIEW SECTION VIEWSIDE VIEW SECTION VIEW Eccentric Reducers Eccentric Reducers are fittings that transition between two pipes, either in line with one another or at perpendicular angles. The inverts of the two pipes are at the same elevations. When an eccentric reducer is used to connect the manifold pipe to the lateral pipes, most debris will follow the flow of the storm water into the lateral pipes. SIDE VIEW SECTION VIEW SIDE VIEW SECTION VIEW 2 4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026. (800) 821-6710 – www.ads-pipe.com Riser Each retention/detention system typically has risers strategically placed for maintenance and inspection of the system. These risers are typically 24” in diameter or larger and are placed on the manifold fittings. Cleanouts Cleanout ports are usually 4-, 6-, or 8-in diameter pipe and are placed on the manifold fittings. They are used for entrance of a pipe from a vacuum truck or a water-jetting device. For a complete listing of available fittings and components please refer to the ADS Fittings Manual. Maintenance Overview of a Retention/Detention System Maintaining a clean and obstruction-free retention/detention system helps to ensure the system performs the intended function of the primary design. Build up of debris may obstruct flow through the laterals in a retention system or block the entranceway of the outlet pipe in a detention system. This may result in ineffective operation or complete failure of the system . Additionally, surrounding areas may potentially run the risk of damage due to flooding or other similar issues. Inspection/Maintenance Frequency All retention/detention systems must be cleaned and maintained. Underground systems may be maintained more cost effectively if these simple guidelines are followed. Inspection should be performed at a minimum of once per year. Cleaning should be done at the discretion of individuals responsible to maintain proper storage and flow. While maintenance can generally be performed year round, it should be scheduled during a relatively dry season. Pre-Inspection A post-installation inspection should be performed to allow the owner to measure the invert prior to accumulation of sediment. This survey will allow the monitoring of sediment build-up without requiring access to the retention/detention system. The following is the recommended procedure for pre-inspections: 1) Locate the riser section or cleanouts of the retention/detention system. The riser will typically be 24” in diameter or larger and the cleanouts are usually 4”, 6” or 8” in diameter. 2) Remove the lid of the riser or clean outs. 3) Insert a measuring device into the opening and make note to a point of reference on the stick or string. (This is done so that sediment build up can be determined in the future without having to enter the system.) RISER CROSS-SECTION VIEW CLEANOUT CROSS-SECTION VIEW 3 4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026. (800) 821-6710 – www.ads-pipe.com Inspection/Maintenance A retention/detention system should be inspected at a minimum of one time a year or after major rain events if necessary. The following is the recommended procedure to inspect system in service: 1) Locate the riser section of the retention/detention system. The riser will typically be 24” in diameter or larger. 2) Remove the lid from the riser. 3) Measure the sediment buildup at each riser and cleanout location. Only certified confined space entry personnel having appropriate equipment should be permitted to enter the retention/detention System. 4) Inspect each manifold, all laterals, and outlet pipes for sediment build up, obstructions, or other problems. Obstructions should be removed at this time. 5) If measured sediment build up is between 5% - 20% of the pipe diameter, cleaning should be considered; if sediment build up exceeds 20%, cleaning should be performed at the earliest opportunity. A thorough cleaning of the system (manifolds and laterals) shall be performed by either manual methods or by a vacuum truck. WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 30 Appendix E: Geotechnical Information (Storm water infiltration BMP evaluation) FIELD PERCOLATION TESTING PARK PLAZA MEMORY CARE EXPANSION 574 SOUTH GLASSELL STREET CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: KC Orange II, L.P. 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Project No. 12137.002 May 8, 2019 May 8, 2019 Project No. 12137.002 KC Orange II, L.P. 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Axel Guerra Subject: Field Percolation Testing Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 574 South Glassell Street City of Orange, California Reference: Leighton Consulting, Inc., 2019, Geotechnical Exploration Report, Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion, 574 South Glassell Street, City of Orange, California, Project No. 12317.002, dated January 29, 2019. Introduction In accordance with your request and authorization, Leighton Consulting, Inc. has performed percolation testing to aid in the design of an onsite stormwater infiltration system for the Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion at 574 South Glassell Street in the city of Orange, California. Our field percolation testing was based on our proposal dated April 12, 2019, and the conceptual site plan prepared by PLSA Engineering. We understand that the proposed stormwater infiltration system will consist of a corrugated metal pipe (CMP) tank with an invert depth of approximately 12 feet. The CMP tank will be located on the western portion of the site. Scope of Work The purpose of our study was to evaluate infiltration rate of the onsite soils to aid in the design of a stormwater infiltration system. The scope of work included the following tasks: Project No. 12137.002 2 • Field Exploration – Our field exploration was performed on April 18, 2019, and consisted of two hollow-stem auger borings (P-1 and P-2) drilled to a depth of 12 feet below existing grade. Approximate boring/percolation test locations are shown on Figure 1, Percolation Test Location Map. The borings were geotechnically logged and sampled using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at selected intervals. The SPT samplers were driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer, free falling 30 inches. The number of blows was noted for every 6 inches of sampler penetration. Each soil sample collected was described in general conformance with the United Soil Classification System (USCS). The samples were sealed and packaged for transportation to our laboratory. Logs of borings are presented in Appendix A, Boring Logs. • Field Percolation Tests – Borings P-1 and P-2 were converted to temporary percolation test wells and pre-soaked for testing upon completion of drilling. In-situ percolation testing was performed in general accordance with County of Orange Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/Preliminary and/or Project Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs), dated December 20, 2013. A 2- inch-diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) section of perforated pipe (.020 slotted screen) was placed in the borehole and the annulus was filled with clean sand (No. 3 Monterey Sand). After pre-soaking, the test wells were filled to a water level at least five times the boring radius above the bottom of the boring to determine the standard time interval for the percolation test. Once the standard time interval was established for each well, the wells were filled to the initial water level used to determine the standard time interval. The water drop was then measured at the standard time interval using a manual water sounder. At the end of the time interval, the wells were refilled approximately to the initial water level and the procedure repeated until the test was completed. Field data and calculated infiltration rate for each well is presented in Appendix C, Percolation Test Results. After the conclusion of percolation testing, the PVC pipes were removed from the test well. The test wells were backfilled with the soil cuttings and capped with cold asphalt. • Laboratory Testing - Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to evaluate their physical characteristics. The laboratory testing consisted of Passing No. 200 Sieve (ASTM D 1140). The test results are presented in Appendix B, Laboratory Test Results. • Engineering Analysis - The data obtained from our background review, field exploration, and in-situ percolation testing program were evaluated and analyzed to Project No. 12137.002 3 provide infiltration rates at each tested location. • Report Preparation - The results of the exploration and in-situ percolation testing are summarized in this report presenting our findings and conclusions. Subsurface Conditions Based on our exploration, the subsurface soils at the CMP tank location consisted mainly of clayey sand to a depth of 10 feet below existing grade. Below the clayey sand, poorly- graded sand with gravel was encountered to the explored depth of 12 feet below existing grade. Detailed descriptions of the soils encountered in our borings are presented in the boring logs (Appendix A). Based on the previous investigation (Leighton Consulting, 2019), the site is underlain by a thin layer of man-made fill associated with construction of the existing improvements at the site and quaternary-age alluvial fan deposits. The fill is up to 4 to 5 feet thick and consisted mainly of silty sand. Below the fill, the alluvium generally consisted of dense to very dense sand and stiff to very stiff sandy clay. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in our explorations excavated to the maximum depth of 12 feet. Groundwater was not encountered in the previous explorations (Leighton Consulting, 2019) drilled to a maximum depth of 33 feet below the existing grade. The historically high groundwater level for this area, according to the California Geologic Survey (1997), is on the order of 40 feet below the existing ground surface. Groundwater is not anticipated to adversely impact construction of the proposed improvements. Fluctuations of the groundwater level, localized zones of perched water, and an increase in soil moisture should be anticipated during and following the rainy seasons or periods of locally intense rainfall or storm water runoff. Infiltration Rates The percolation test at each test well was performed using the falling-head method which records the drop of water level inside the test well over the specified time interval, and is then repeated several times until consistent measurements are achieved. The measured infiltration rate for each percolation test was calculated by dividing the rate of discharge (i.e. volume of water discharged from the well during the test) by the infiltration surface area or flow area. A porosity reduction factor was applied to account for the filter pack Project No. 12137.002 4 material installed in the annulus of each test well. The flow area was determined based on the average height of water within the test well during each time interval. Detailed results of the field testing data and measured infiltration rate for the test wells are presented in Appendix C, Percolation Test Data. As per the guidelines by County of Orange (2013), the measured infiltration rates should be reduced by the design professional with a correction factor to determine design values that will represent long-term performance of the proposed infiltration system. Based on the type of test and number of tests performed, site variability, and long-term performance of the proposed infiltration system, a correction factor of 2 is used. Results of the percolation testing are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 – Measured Infiltration Rate Boring- Percolation Test Well Designation Target Interval Depth (feet) Measured Infiltration Rate (inches per hour) Design Infiltration Rate (inches per hour) P-1 9 to 12 7.6 3.8 P-2 6.4 3.2 It should be emphasized that the infiltration rate is only representative of the tested location and depth where they are performed. Varying subsurface conditions will exist outside of the test locations, which could alter the calculated infiltration rates indicated above. The infiltration test was performed using relatively clean water free of particulates and silt. The infiltration rates will decline over time between maintenance cycles as the infiltration surface becomes occluded and particulates accumulate in the infiltrative layer. Prior to construction of any infiltration device intended for the site, the WQMP plan should be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant to verify that the geotechnical recommendations have been appropriately incorporated into the plans and not compromised by the addition of an infiltration system to the site. The designer of any infiltration system should contact the geotechnical consultant for geotechnical input during the design process as they feel necessary. Design Considerations The following recommendation should be considered minimal from a geotechnical viewpoint as there may be more restrictive requirements of the governing agencies. As a minimum, we recommend the following setbacks of the stormwater infiltration system. Project No. 12137.002 5 Table 2 – Stormwater infiltration System Setbacks Setback from Distance Property lines and public right-of-way 10 feet Any foundation 15 feet or a 1:1 plane drawn up from the bottom of foundation, whichever is greater Private water wells used for drinking water 100 feet In general, a vast majority of geotechnical distress issues are related to improper drainage. Distress in the form of foundation movement could occur. Soil saturation could lead to a loss of soil support of foundations and pavements, settlement or collapse, internal erosion (piping) and expansion. Offsite properties could be affected and those improvements may become subjected to seeps, springs, foundation movement or other geotechnical issues related to infiltration and water migration. Additionally, infiltration water can migrate along pipe backfill (typically sand or gravel bedding), thereby impacting improvements away from the point of infiltration. Any proposed infiltration system should not be located near existing or proposed improvements in order to reduce the geotechnical distress issues related to infiltration. Where sufficient distance from improvements cannot be achieved, additional recommendations may need to be provided. As with all systems that are designed to concentrate surface flow and direct water into the subsurface soils, some type of nuisance water and other geotechnical water related issues should be anticipated. We recommend sufficient distances between infiltration devices and sensitive improvements be maintained. Routine maintenance should be required of any infiltration system. Construction Considerations Infiltration of stormwater may result in a temporary rise in the groundwater elevation. This rise in groundwater could change the soil structure by dissolving or deteriorating the intergranular contacts between the sand particles, resulting in a sudden collapse, referred to as hydrocollapse. This collapse phenomenon generally occurs during the first saturation episode after deposition of the soil, and repeated cycles of saturation are not likely to result in additional collapse. Based on our current and previous explorations, the potential for hydrocollapse is low. However, as a precautionary measure, the excavated trench for the proposed CMP tank should be inundated with water prior to installation of the tank, in order to densify the sand particles. Project No. 12137.002 6 Conclusion The percolation tests performed indicate a measured infiltration rate that meets the minimum requirement for stormwater infiltration feasibility (0.3 inches per hour) per the guidelines by County of Orange (2013). Limitations This report was based on data obtained from limited number of observations, site visits, soil excavations, samples, and tests. Such information is, by necessity, incomplete. The nature of many sites is such that differing soil or geologic conditions will be present within small distances and under varying climatic conditions. Changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. Therefore, the findings presented in this report are only valid if Leighton Consulting has the opportunity to observe subsurface conditions during grading and construction of sustainable design elements to confirm that our preliminary data are representative for the site. Leighton Consulting should review the construction plans and project specifications, when available, to comment on the geotechnical aspects. This report was prepared using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. The findings included in this report are considered preliminary and are subject to verification. We do not make any warranty, either expressed or implied. Project No. 12137.002 7 Closing We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Djan Chandra, PE, GE 2376 Senior Principal Engineer CD/DJC/lr Attachments: Figure 1 – Percolation Test Location Map Appendix A – Boring Logs Appendix B – Laboratory Test Results Appendix C – Percolation Test Results Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF via email) PROPOSEDINFILTRATION TANKLOCATIONGLASSELL STREETNORTHP-1P-2FIGURE 1 - PERCOLATION TEST LOCATION MAPPark Plaza Memory Care Expansion574 South Glassell StreetCity of Orange, CaliforniaProject No.: 12137.002Date: May 2019Engineer: DJCP-2Approximate Location of Percolation Test Well.Total Depth=12 Feet.Groundwater Not Encountered.LEGEND APPENDIX A BORING LOGS SC ML SP S-1 S-2 S-3 -200 1 2 2 3 2 3 15 20 19 Surface: 4 inches of asphalt concrete @ 0.3': Clayey SAND, yellowish brown, slightly moist, low plasticity, fine sand, some subangular gravel @ 5': Loose, some subrounded gravel @ 7.5': Sandy SILT, loose, olive brown, moist, fine sand, nonplastic @ 10.5': Poorly-graded SAND with Gravel, very dense, olive brown, slightly moist, fine to medium sand, subangular gravel Total Depth of Boring: 12 feet. No free groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring converted into a percolation test well, screen interval from 7 to 12 feet. Percolation testing performed on 4/18/2019. Percolation test well removed and boring backfilled with soil cuttings and patched with cold asphalt. ' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLE GRAB SAMPLE RING SAMPLE SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE TUBE SAMPLE B C G R S T CD Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 30" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 Soil Class.4-18-19 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. Ground Elevation DepthBlowsElevationPer 6 InchesPage 1 of 1AttitudesSAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling, Inc.Content, %GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG P-1 Logged By Date Drilled * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * CD FeetS (U.S.C.S.)LogType of TestsGraphicpcfLocation See Figure 1 - Percolation Test Location Map Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 12137.002 Drilling Method 8"FeetHole Diameter MoistureDry DensityN This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may be gradual. TYPE OF TESTS: -200 AL CN CO CR CU % FINES PASSING ATTERBERG LIMITS CONSOLIDATION COLLAPSE CORROSION UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DS EI H MD PP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEX HYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITY POCKET PENETROMETER R VALUE SA SE SG UC SIEVE ANALYSIS SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHSample No. SC SC-CL SP S-1 S-2 S-3 -200 2 2 2 2 4 6 7 15 12 Surface: 4 inches of asphalt concrete @ 0.3': Clayey SAND, yellowish brown, slightly moist, low plasticity, fine sand @ 5': Loose, some subrounded gravel @ 7.5': Sandy CLAY to Clayey SAND, medium stiff to medium dense, olive brown, moist, fine sand, low plastic, trace subrounded gravel @ 10.5': Poorly-graded SAND with Gravel, dense, olive brown, slightly moist, fine to medium sand, subangular gravel Total Depth of Boring: 12 feet. No free groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring converted into a percolation test well, screen interval from 7 to 12 feet. Percolation testing performed on 4/18/2019. Percolation test well removed and boring backfilled with soil cuttings and patched with cold asphalt. ' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLE GRAB SAMPLE RING SAMPLE SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE TUBE SAMPLE B C G R S T CD Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 30" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 Soil Class.4-18-19 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. Ground Elevation DepthBlowsElevationPer 6 InchesPage 1 of 1AttitudesSAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling, Inc.Content, %GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG P-2 Logged By Date Drilled * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * CD FeetS (U.S.C.S.)LogType of TestsGraphicpcfLocation See Figure 1 - Percolation Test Location Map Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion 12137.002 Drilling Method 8"FeetHole Diameter MoistureDry DensityN This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may be gradual. TYPE OF TESTS: -200 AL CN CO CR CU % FINES PASSING ATTERBERG LIMITS CONSOLIDATION COLLAPSE CORROSION UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DS EI H MD PP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEX HYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITY POCKET PENETROMETER R VALUE SA SE SG UC SIEVE ANALYSIS SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHSample No. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Passing #200 P-1 & P-2 P-1 P-2 S-3 S-3 10.5 10.5 Small Bag Small Bag 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 494.9 642.5 214.9 206.3 280.0 436.2 A A 481.2 620.0 214.9 206.3 266.3 413.7 4.9 5.2 95.1 94.8 Project Name:Park Plaza Memory Care Expansion Project No.:12137.002 Tested By:ACS/OHF Date:04/19/19 Moisture Correction Dry Weight of Sample + Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Container No.: Wet Weight of Soil + Container (g) Sample Dry Weight Determination Olive poorly- graded sand with gravel (SP)g Dry Weight of Soil + Container (g) PERCENT PASSING No. 200 SIEVE ASTM D 1140 Weight of Sample + Container (g) Method (A or B) Weight of Container (g) Weight of Dry Sample (g) Olive poorly- graded sand with gravel (SP)g Boring No. Sample No. Soil Identification Depth (ft.) Sample Type % Passing No. 200 Sieve % Retained No. 200 Sieve After Wash Dry Weight of Sample (g) Weight of Container (g) Moisture Content (%) APPENDIX C PERCOLATION TEST DATA Project Number:12137.002 Test Hole Number:P-1 Project Name:KSL Park Plaza Date Excavated: Earth Description:Alluvium Date Tested: Liquid Description:Tap water Depth of boring (ft):12 Tested By: CD Radius of boring (in):4 Time Interval Standard Radius of casing (in):1 Start Time for Pre-Soak:Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard: Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 10 Bentonite Plug at Bottom: No Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 9:00 8.50 42.0 9:10 12.00 0.0 9:11 8.50 42.0 9:21 12.00 0.0 9:21 9.00 36.0 9:31 12.00 0.0 9:32 9.00 36.0 9:37 12.00 0.0 9:38 9.00 36.0 9:41 11.71 3.5 9:42 9.00 36.0 9:45 11.53 5.6 9:46 9.00 36.0 9:49 11.41 7.1 9:50 9.00 36.0 9:53 11.20 9.6 9:54 9.00 36.0 9:57 11.15 10.2 9:58 9.00 36.0 10:01 11.05 11.4 10:02 9.00 36.0 10:05 11.08 11.0 10:06 9.00 36.0 10:09 11.07 11.2 Tested Infiltration Rate, I (Last Reading) =15.2 in./hr. Measured Infiltration Rate = I/2 =7.6 in./hr. Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 12 3 24.8 0.12 15.17 11 3 25.0 0.12 15.28 10 3 24.6 0.12 14.96 9 3 25.8 0.12 16.06 8 3 26.4 0.11 16.63 7 3 28.9 0.10 19.20 6 3 30.4 0.10 20.79 5 3 32.5 0.09 23.37 4 5 36.0 0.14 16.88 2 10 42.0 0.24 8.56 1 10 42.0 0.24 8.56 3 10 36.0 0.28 8.44 Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet 4/18/2019 4/18/2019 4/18/2019 8:00 4/18/2019 9:00 Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data Project Number:12137.002 Test Hole Number:P-2 Project Name:KSL Park Plaza Date Excavated: Earth Description:Alluvium Date Tested: Liquid Description:Tap water Depth of boring (ft):12 Tested By: CD Radius of boring (in):4 Time Interval Standard Radius of casing (in):1 Start Time for Pre-Soak:Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard: Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 10 Bentonite Plug at Bottom: No Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 10:10 8.50 42.0 10:20 12.00 0.0 10:20 8.50 42.0 10:30 12.00 0.0 10:31 9.00 36.0 10:41 12.00 0.0 10:42 9.00 36.0 10:47 12.00 0.0 10:48 9.00 36.0 10:51 11.23 9.2 10:52 9.00 36.0 10:55 11.11 10.7 10:56 9.00 36.0 10:59 11.07 11.2 11:00 9.00 36.0 11:03 10.88 13.4 11:04 9.00 36.0 11:07 10.83 14.0 11:08 9.00 36.0 11:11 10.85 13.8 11:12 9.00 36.0 11:15 10.86 13.7 11:16 9.00 36.0 11:19 10.84 13.9 Tested Infiltration Rate, I (Last Reading) =12.8 in./hr. Measured Infiltration Rate = I/2 =6.4 in./hr. Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet 4/18/2019 4/18/2019 4/18/2019 8:30 4/18/2019 10:10 Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data 1 10 42.0 0.24 8.56 3 10 36.0 0.28 8.44 2 10 42.0 0.24 8.56 5 3 26.8 0.11 16.98 4 5 36.0 0.14 16.88 7 3 24.8 0.12 15.17 6 3 25.3 0.12 15.61 9 3 22.0 0.14 12.70 8 3 22.6 0.13 13.19 11 3 22.3 0.13 12.99 10 3 22.2 0.14 12.89 Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 12 3 22.1 0.14 12.80 WQMP for Park Plaza Expansion May 2019 31 Appendix F: Hydrology Information (Q2 – Two-year frequency storm evaluation) ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983‐2016 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 23.0 Release Date: 07/01/2016 License ID 1452 Analysis prepared by: PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES 27127 Calle Arroyo, Suite 1904, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 ph 949.661.6695 plsaengineering.com ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * PARK PLAZA EXPANSION * * 2‐YR PRE‐DEVELOPMENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: 2PRE.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 17:30 02/21/2019 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ ‐‐*TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION MODEL*‐‐ USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER‐DEFINED STREET‐SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF‐ CROWN TO STREET‐CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER‐GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN‐ / OUT‐/PARK‐ HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW‐DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow‐Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) ‐ (Top‐of‐Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER‐SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 110.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 324.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 188.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 185.20 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.939 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.736 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.85 0.40 0.100 17 7.94 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.30 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.85 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.30 ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.9 TC(MIN.) = 7.94 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.85 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.04 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.30 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS **************************************************************************** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2008 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 15.0 Release Date: 04/01/2008 License ID 1452 Analysis prepared by: PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES 535 N Coast Highway 101 Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 ph 858.259.8212 plsaengineering.com **************************************************************************** 3034 Park Plaza 2-Yr Existing Condition ============================================================================ NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS FOR AMC I: TOTAL 24-HOUR DURATION RAINFALL DEPTH = 2.05 (inches) SOIL-COVER AREA PERCENT OF SCS CURVE LOSS RATE TYPE (Acres) PERVIOUS AREA NUMBER Fp(in./hr.) YIELD 1 0.85 10.00 32.(AMC II) 0.400 0.801 TOTAL AREA (Acres) = 0.85 AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE, Fm (in./hr.) = 0.040 AREA-AVERAGED LOW LOSS FRACTION, Y = 0.199 ============================================================================ ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** SMALL AREA UNIT HYDROGRAPH MODEL ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2008 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 15.0 Release Date: 04/01/2008 License ID 1452 Analysis prepared by: PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES 535 N Coast Highway 101 Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 ph 858.259.8212 plsaengineering.com **************************************************************************** 3034 Park Plaza 2-Yr Existing Condition ============================================================================ RATIONAL METHOD CALIBRATION COEFFICIENT = 0.90 TOTAL CATCHMENT AREA(ACRES) = 0.85 SOIL-LOSS RATE, Fm,(INCH/HR) = 0.040 LOW LOSS FRACTION = 0.199 TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.94 SMALL AREA PEAK Q COMPUTED USING PEAK FLOW RATE FORMULA ORANGE COUNTY "VALLEY" RAINFALL VALUES ARE USED RETURN FREQUENCY(YEARS) = 2 5-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.19 30-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.40 1-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.53 3-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.89 6-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 1.22 24-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 2.05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CATCHMENT RUNOFF VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.11 TOTAL CATCHMENT SOIL-LOSS VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.04 **************************************************************************** TIME VOLUME Q 0. 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (HOURS) (AF) (CFS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.12 0.0001 0.02 Q . . . . 0.25 0.0003 0.02 Q . . . . 0.38 0.0005 0.02 Q . . . . 0.52 0.0008 0.02 Q . . . . 0.65 0.0010 0.02 Q . . . . 0.78 0.0012 0.02 Q . . . . 0.91 0.0014 0.02 Q . . . . 1.05 0.0016 0.02 Q . . . . 1.18 0.0019 0.02 Q . . . . 1.31 0.0021 0.02 Q . . . . 1.44 0.0023 0.02 Q . . . . 1.58 0.0025 0.02 Q . . . . 1.71 0.0028 0.02 Q . . . . 1.84 0.0030 0.02 Q . . . . 1.97 0.0032 0.02 Q . . . . 2.11 0.0035 0.02 Q . . . . 2.24 0.0037 0.02 Q . . . . 2.37 0.0039 0.02 Q . . . . 2.50 0.0042 0.02 Q . . . . 2.63 0.0044 0.02 Q . . . . 2.77 0.0046 0.02 Q . . . . 2.90 0.0049 0.02 Q . . . . 3.03 0.0051 0.02 Q . . . . 3.16 0.0054 0.02 Q . . . . 3.30 0.0056 0.02 Q . . . . 3.43 0.0059 0.02 Q . . . . 3.56 0.0061 0.02 Q . . . . 3.69 0.0064 0.02 Q . . . . 3.83 0.0066 0.02 Q . . . . 3.96 0.0069 0.02 Q . . . . 4.09 0.0071 0.02 Q . . . . 4.22 0.0074 0.02 Q . . . . 4.35 0.0076 0.02 Q . . . . 4.49 0.0079 0.02 Q . . . . 4.62 0.0082 0.02 Q . . . . 4.75 0.0084 0.02 Q . . . . 4.88 0.0087 0.02 Q . . . . 5.02 0.0090 0.02 Q . . . . 5.15 0.0092 0.02 Q . . . . 5.28 0.0095 0.03 Q . . . . 5.41 0.0098 0.03 Q . . . . 5.55 0.0101 0.03 Q . . . . 5.68 0.0103 0.03 Q . . . . 5.81 0.0106 0.03 Q . . . . 5.94 0.0109 0.03 Q . . . . 6.07 0.0112 0.03 Q . . . . 6.21 0.0115 0.03 Q . . . . 6.34 0.0118 0.03 Q . . . . 6.47 0.0121 0.03 Q . . . . 6.60 0.0123 0.03 Q . . . . 6.74 0.0126 0.03 Q . . . . 6.87 0.0129 0.03 Q . . . . 7.00 0.0133 0.03 Q . . . . 7.13 0.0136 0.03 Q . . . . 7.27 0.0139 0.03 Q . . . . 7.40 0.0142 0.03 Q . . . . 7.53 0.0145 0.03 Q . . . . 7.66 0.0148 0.03 Q . . . . 7.80 0.0151 0.03 Q . . . . 7.93 0.0155 0.03 Q . . . . 8.06 0.0158 0.03 Q . . . . 8.19 0.0161 0.03 Q . . . . 8.32 0.0165 0.03 Q . . . . 8.46 0.0168 0.03 Q . . . . 8.59 0.0171 0.03 Q . . . . 8.72 0.0175 0.03 Q . . . . 8.85 0.0178 0.03 Q . . . . 8.99 0.0182 0.03 Q . . . . 9.12 0.0185 0.03 Q . . . . 9.25 0.0189 0.03 Q . . . . 9.38 0.0193 0.03 Q . . . . 9.52 0.0196 0.03 Q . . . . 9.65 0.0200 0.03 Q . . . . 9.78 0.0204 0.04 Q . . . . 9.91 0.0208 0.04 Q . . . . 10.05 0.0212 0.04 Q . . . . 10.18 0.0216 0.04 Q . . . . 10.31 0.0220 0.04 Q . . . . 10.44 0.0224 0.04 Q . . . . 10.57 0.0228 0.04 Q . . . . 10.71 0.0232 0.04 Q . . . . 10.84 0.0236 0.04 Q . . . . 10.97 0.0241 0.04 Q . . . . 11.10 0.0245 0.04 Q . . . . 11.24 0.0250 0.04 Q . . . . 11.37 0.0254 0.04 Q . . . . 11.50 0.0259 0.04 Q . . . . 11.63 0.0263 0.04 Q . . . . 11.77 0.0268 0.04 Q . . . . 11.90 0.0273 0.05 Q . . . . 12.03 0.0278 0.05 Q . . . . 12.16 0.0284 0.06 Q . . . . 12.29 0.0290 0.06 Q . . . . 12.43 0.0296 0.06 Q . . . . 12.56 0.0303 0.06 Q . . . . 12.69 0.0310 0.06 Q . . . . 12.82 0.0317 0.06 Q . . . . 12.96 0.0323 0.06 Q . . . . 13.09 0.0331 0.07 Q . . . . 13.22 0.0338 0.07 Q . . . . 13.35 0.0345 0.07 Q . . . . 13.49 0.0353 0.07 Q . . . . 13.62 0.0361 0.07 Q . . . . 13.75 0.0369 0.08 Q . . . . 13.88 0.0378 0.08 Q . . . . 14.02 0.0386 0.08 Q . . . . 14.15 0.0395 0.09 Q . . . . 14.28 0.0405 0.09 Q . . . . 14.41 0.0415 0.09 Q . . . . 14.54 0.0425 0.10 Q . . . . 14.68 0.0436 0.10 Q . . . . 14.81 0.0448 0.11 Q . . . . 14.94 0.0460 0.11 Q . . . . 15.07 0.0473 0.12 Q . . . . 15.21 0.0487 0.13 Q . . . . 15.34 0.0502 0.15 Q . . . . 15.47 0.0518 0.15 Q . . . . 15.60 0.0535 0.17 Q . . . . 15.74 0.0555 0.19 Q . . . . 15.87 0.0582 0.30 .Q . . . . 16.00 0.0621 0.41 .Q . . . . 16.13 0.0714 1.30 . Q . . . . 16.26 0.0798 0.23 Q . . . . 16.40 0.0819 0.15 Q . . . . 16.53 0.0835 0.14 Q . . . . 16.66 0.0849 0.12 Q . . . . 16.79 0.0861 0.10 Q . . . . 16.93 0.0872 0.10 Q . . . . 17.06 0.0882 0.09 Q . . . . 17.19 0.0892 0.08 Q . . . . 17.32 0.0900 0.07 Q . . . . 17.46 0.0908 0.07 Q . . . . 17.59 0.0915 0.07 Q . . . . 17.72 0.0922 0.06 Q . . . . 17.85 0.0929 0.06 Q . . . . 17.98 0.0936 0.06 Q . . . . 18.12 0.0942 0.05 Q . . . . 18.25 0.0947 0.04 Q . . . . 18.38 0.0952 0.04 Q . . . . 18.51 0.0956 0.04 Q . . . . 18.65 0.0961 0.04 Q . . . . 18.78 0.0965 0.04 Q . . . . 18.91 0.0969 0.04 Q . . . . 19.04 0.0973 0.04 Q . . . . 19.18 0.0977 0.04 Q . . . . 19.31 0.0981 0.03 Q . . . . 19.44 0.0985 0.03 Q . . . . 19.57 0.0989 0.03 Q . . . . 19.71 0.0992 0.03 Q . . . . 19.84 0.0996 0.03 Q . . . . 19.97 0.0999 0.03 Q . . . . 20.10 0.1003 0.03 Q . . . . 20.23 0.1006 0.03 Q . . . . 20.37 0.1009 0.03 Q . . . . 20.50 0.1012 0.03 Q . . . . 20.63 0.1015 0.03 Q . . . . 20.76 0.1018 0.03 Q . . . . 20.90 0.1021 0.03 Q . . . . 21.03 0.1024 0.03 Q . . . . 21.16 0.1027 0.03 Q . . . . 21.29 0.1030 0.03 Q . . . . 21.43 0.1033 0.03 Q . . . . 21.56 0.1035 0.02 Q . . . . 21.69 0.1038 0.02 Q . . . . 21.82 0.1041 0.02 Q . . . . 21.95 0.1043 0.02 Q . . . . 22.09 0.1046 0.02 Q . . . . 22.22 0.1049 0.02 Q . . . . 22.35 0.1051 0.02 Q . . . . 22.48 0.1054 0.02 Q . . . . 22.62 0.1056 0.02 Q . . . . 22.75 0.1059 0.02 Q . . . . 22.88 0.1061 0.02 Q . . . . 23.01 0.1063 0.02 Q . . . . 23.15 0.1066 0.02 Q . . . . 23.28 0.1068 0.02 Q . . . . 23.41 0.1070 0.02 Q . . . . 23.54 0.1072 0.02 Q . . . . 23.68 0.1075 0.02 Q . . . . 23.81 0.1077 0.02 Q . . . . 23.94 0.1079 0.02 Q . . . . 24.07 0.1081 0.02 Q . . . . 24.20 0.1082 0.00 Q . . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME DURATION(minutes) OF PERCENTILES OF ESTIMATED PEAK FLOW RATE: (Note: 100% of Peak Flow Rate estimate assumed to have an instantaneous time duration) Percentile of Estimated Duration Peak Flow Rate (minutes) ======================= ========= 0% 1445.1 10% 87.3 20% 23.8 30% 15.9 40% 7.9 50% 7.9 60% 7.9 70% 7.9 80% 7.9 90% 7.9 Hydraulic Analysis Report Project Data Project Title: 3034 Park Plaza Channel Analysis: Pre-Project Input Parameters Channel Type: Rectangular Channel Width: 27.6000 ft Longitudinal Slope: 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n: 0.0150 Flow: 1.3000 cfs Result Parameters Depth: 0.0405 ft Area of Flow: 1.1177 ft^2 Wetted Perimeter: 27.6810 ft Hydraulic Radius: 0.0404 ft Average Velocity: 1.1631 ft/s Top Width: 27.6000 ft Froude Number: 1.0185 Critical Depth: 0.0410 ft Critical Velocity: 1.1489 ft/s Critical Slope: 0.0096 ft/ft Critical Top Width: 27.60 ft Calculated Max Shear Stress: 0.0253 lb/ft^2 Calculated Avg Shear Stress: 0.0252 lb/ft^2 <<<<<<<< <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< L=324' EL.=188.0 EL.=185.2 1.0 AC EL.=1555.0 < ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2016 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 23.0 Release Date: 07/01/2016 License ID 1452 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * PARK PLAZA EXPANSION * * 2-YR POST DEVELOPMENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: 2POST.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:34 05/09/2019 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 323.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 188.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 184.90 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 8.275 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.695 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL "11+ DWELLINGS/ACRE" A 0.57 0.40 0.200 17 8.28 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.83 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.83 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 102.00 TO NODE 400.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 182.90 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 182.80 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 20.00 MANNING'S N = 0.009 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 9.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.65 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 9.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 0.83 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.09 Tc(MIN.) = 8.37 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 400.00 = 343.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 400.00 TO NODE 400.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.37 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.68 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 0.83 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 202.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 193.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 188.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 187.24 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.681 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.769 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL "11+ DWELLINGS/ACRE" A 0.23 0.40 0.200 17 7.68 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.23 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.35 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 202.00 TO NODE 400.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 183.90 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 182.80 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 33.00 MANNING'S N = 0.009 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 6.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.0 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.92 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 6.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 0.35 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.09 Tc(MIN.) = 7.77 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 400.00 = 226.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 400.00 TO NODE 400.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.77 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.76 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.23 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.23 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 0.35 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.83 8.37 1.685 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 0.6 100.00 2 0.35 7.77 1.757 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 0.2 200.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.15 7.77 1.757 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 0.8 200.00 2 1.16 8.37 1.685 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 0.8 100.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.16 Tc(MIN.) = 8.37 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.80 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.8 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 400.00 = 343.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 302.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 19.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 188.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 187.90 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.264 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL "11+ DWELLINGS/ACRE" A 0.05 0.40 0.200 17 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.05 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.10 ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.1 TC(MIN.) = 5.00 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.200 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.10 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS **************************************************************************** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2008 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 15.0 Release Date: 04/01/2008 License ID 1452 Analysis prepared by: PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES 535 N Coast Highway 101 Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 ph 858.259.8212 plsaengineering.com **************************************************************************** 3034 Park Plaza 2-Yr Post Project ============================================================================ NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS FOR AMC I: TOTAL 24-HOUR DURATION RAINFALL DEPTH = 2.05 (inches) SOIL-COVER AREA PERCENT OF SCS CURVE LOSS RATE TYPE (Acres) PERVIOUS AREA NUMBER Fp(in./hr.) YIELD 1 0.80 20.00 32.(AMC II) 0.400 0.712 TOTAL AREA (Acres) = 0.80 AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE, Fm (in./hr.) = 0.080 AREA-AVERAGED LOW LOSS FRACTION, Y = 0.288 ============================================================================ ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** SMALL AREA UNIT HYDROGRAPH MODEL ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2008 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 15.0 Release Date: 04/01/2008 License ID 1452 Analysis prepared by: PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES 535 N Coast Highway 101 Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 ph 858.259.8212 plsaengineering.com **************************************************************************** 3034 Park Plaza 2-Yr Post Project ============================================================================ RATIONAL METHOD CALIBRATION COEFFICIENT = 0.90 TOTAL CATCHMENT AREA(ACRES) = 0.80 SOIL-LOSS RATE, Fm,(INCH/HR) = 0.080 LOW LOSS FRACTION = 0.288 TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.37 SMALL AREA PEAK Q COMPUTED USING PEAK FLOW RATE FORMULA ORANGE COUNTY "VALLEY" RAINFALL VALUES ARE USED RETURN FREQUENCY(YEARS) = 2 5-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.19 30-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.40 1-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.53 3-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.89 6-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 1.22 24-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 2.05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CATCHMENT RUNOFF VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.09 TOTAL CATCHMENT SOIL-LOSS VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.05 **************************************************************************** TIME VOLUME Q 0. 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (HOURS) (AF) (CFS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.10 0.0001 0.02 Q . . . . 0.24 0.0003 0.02 Q . . . . 0.38 0.0005 0.02 Q . . . . 0.52 0.0007 0.02 Q . . . . 0.66 0.0009 0.02 Q . . . . 0.79 0.0011 0.02 Q . . . . 0.93 0.0013 0.02 Q . . . . 1.07 0.0014 0.02 Q . . . . 1.21 0.0016 0.02 Q . . . . 1.35 0.0018 0.02 Q . . . . 1.49 0.0020 0.02 Q . . . . 1.63 0.0022 0.02 Q . . . . 1.77 0.0024 0.02 Q . . . . 1.91 0.0026 0.02 Q . . . . 2.05 0.0029 0.02 Q . . . . 2.19 0.0031 0.02 Q . . . . 2.33 0.0033 0.02 Q . . . . 2.47 0.0035 0.02 Q . . . . 2.61 0.0037 0.02 Q . . . . 2.75 0.0039 0.02 Q . . . . 2.89 0.0041 0.02 Q . . . . 3.03 0.0043 0.02 Q . . . . 3.17 0.0045 0.02 Q . . . . 3.31 0.0048 0.02 Q . . . . 3.45 0.0050 0.02 Q . . . . 3.58 0.0052 0.02 Q . . . . 3.72 0.0054 0.02 Q . . . . 3.86 0.0056 0.02 Q . . . . 4.00 0.0059 0.02 Q . . . . 4.14 0.0061 0.02 Q . . . . 4.28 0.0063 0.02 Q . . . . 4.42 0.0065 0.02 Q . . . . 4.56 0.0068 0.02 Q . . . . 4.70 0.0070 0.02 Q . . . . 4.84 0.0072 0.02 Q . . . . 4.98 0.0075 0.02 Q . . . . 5.12 0.0077 0.02 Q . . . . 5.26 0.0080 0.02 Q . . . . 5.40 0.0082 0.02 Q . . . . 5.54 0.0085 0.02 Q . . . . 5.68 0.0087 0.02 Q . . . . 5.82 0.0089 0.02 Q . . . . 5.96 0.0092 0.02 Q . . . . 6.10 0.0094 0.02 Q . . . . 6.24 0.0097 0.02 Q . . . . 6.37 0.0100 0.02 Q . . . . 6.51 0.0102 0.02 Q . . . . 6.65 0.0105 0.02 Q . . . . 6.79 0.0107 0.02 Q . . . . 6.93 0.0110 0.02 Q . . . . 7.07 0.0113 0.02 Q . . . . 7.21 0.0116 0.02 Q . . . . 7.35 0.0118 0.02 Q . . . . 7.49 0.0121 0.02 Q . . . . 7.63 0.0124 0.02 Q . . . . 7.77 0.0127 0.02 Q . . . . 7.91 0.0130 0.02 Q . . . . 8.05 0.0132 0.03 Q . . . . 8.19 0.0135 0.03 Q . . . . 8.33 0.0138 0.03 Q . . . . 8.47 0.0141 0.03 Q . . . . 8.61 0.0144 0.03 Q . . . . 8.75 0.0147 0.03 Q . . . . 8.89 0.0151 0.03 Q . . . . 9.02 0.0154 0.03 Q . . . . 9.16 0.0157 0.03 Q . . . . 9.30 0.0160 0.03 Q . . . . 9.44 0.0163 0.03 Q . . . . 9.58 0.0167 0.03 Q . . . . 9.72 0.0170 0.03 Q . . . . 9.86 0.0173 0.03 Q . . . . 10.00 0.0177 0.03 Q . . . . 10.14 0.0180 0.03 Q . . . . 10.28 0.0184 0.03 Q . . . . 10.42 0.0187 0.03 Q . . . . 10.56 0.0191 0.03 Q . . . . 10.70 0.0195 0.03 Q . . . . 10.84 0.0198 0.03 Q . . . . 10.98 0.0202 0.03 Q . . . . 11.12 0.0206 0.03 Q . . . . 11.26 0.0210 0.03 Q . . . . 11.40 0.0214 0.04 Q . . . . 11.54 0.0218 0.04 Q . . . . 11.68 0.0222 0.04 Q . . . . 11.82 0.0227 0.04 Q . . . . 11.95 0.0231 0.04 Q . . . . 12.09 0.0236 0.04 Q . . . . 12.23 0.0241 0.05 Q . . . . 12.37 0.0246 0.05 Q . . . . 12.51 0.0252 0.05 Q . . . . 12.65 0.0258 0.05 Q . . . . 12.79 0.0264 0.05 Q . . . . 12.93 0.0270 0.05 Q . . . . 13.07 0.0276 0.06 Q . . . . 13.21 0.0283 0.06 Q . . . . 13.35 0.0289 0.06 Q . . . . 13.49 0.0296 0.06 Q . . . . 13.63 0.0303 0.06 Q . . . . 13.77 0.0310 0.06 Q . . . . 13.91 0.0318 0.07 Q . . . . 14.05 0.0325 0.07 Q . . . . 14.19 0.0334 0.07 Q . . . . 14.33 0.0342 0.08 Q . . . . 14.47 0.0351 0.08 Q . . . . 14.60 0.0361 0.08 Q . . . . 14.74 0.0370 0.09 Q . . . . 14.88 0.0381 0.09 Q . . . . 15.02 0.0392 0.10 Q . . . . 15.16 0.0404 0.11 Q . . . . 15.30 0.0417 0.12 Q . . . . 15.44 0.0430 0.12 Q . . . . 15.58 0.0445 0.13 Q . . . . 15.72 0.0461 0.15 Q . . . . 15.86 0.0483 0.24 Q . . . . 16.00 0.0517 0.35 .Q . . . . 16.14 0.0604 1.16 . Q . . . . 16.28 0.0682 0.18 Q . . . . 16.42 0.0699 0.12 Q . . . . 16.56 0.0712 0.11 Q . . . . 16.70 0.0724 0.10 Q . . . . 16.84 0.0735 0.09 Q . . . . 16.98 0.0744 0.08 Q . . . . 17.12 0.0753 0.07 Q . . . . 17.26 0.0760 0.06 Q . . . . 17.39 0.0768 0.06 Q . . . . 17.53 0.0774 0.06 Q . . . . 17.67 0.0781 0.05 Q . . . . 17.81 0.0787 0.05 Q . . . . 17.95 0.0793 0.05 Q . . . . 18.09 0.0798 0.05 Q . . . . 18.23 0.0803 0.04 Q . . . . 18.37 0.0808 0.04 Q . . . . 18.51 0.0812 0.03 Q . . . . 18.65 0.0816 0.03 Q . . . . 18.79 0.0820 0.03 Q . . . . 18.93 0.0823 0.03 Q . . . . 19.07 0.0827 0.03 Q . . . . 19.21 0.0830 0.03 Q . . . . 19.35 0.0834 0.03 Q . . . . 19.49 0.0837 0.03 Q . . . . 19.63 0.0840 0.03 Q . . . . 19.77 0.0843 0.03 Q . . . . 19.91 0.0846 0.03 Q . . . . 20.05 0.0849 0.03 Q . . . . 20.18 0.0852 0.03 Q . . . . 20.32 0.0855 0.02 Q . . . . 20.46 0.0858 0.02 Q . . . . 20.60 0.0861 0.02 Q . . . . 20.74 0.0863 0.02 Q . . . . 20.88 0.0866 0.02 Q . . . . 21.02 0.0869 0.02 Q . . . . 21.16 0.0871 0.02 Q . . . . 21.30 0.0874 0.02 Q . . . . 21.44 0.0876 0.02 Q . . . . 21.58 0.0879 0.02 Q . . . . 21.72 0.0881 0.02 Q . . . . 21.86 0.0883 0.02 Q . . . . 22.00 0.0886 0.02 Q . . . . 22.14 0.0888 0.02 Q . . . . 22.28 0.0890 0.02 Q . . . . 22.42 0.0892 0.02 Q . . . . 22.56 0.0895 0.02 Q . . . . 22.70 0.0897 0.02 Q . . . . 22.84 0.0899 0.02 Q . . . . 22.98 0.0901 0.02 Q . . . . 23.11 0.0903 0.02 Q . . . . 23.25 0.0905 0.02 Q . . . . 23.39 0.0907 0.02 Q . . . . 23.53 0.0909 0.02 Q . . . . 23.67 0.0911 0.02 Q . . . . 23.81 0.0913 0.02 Q . . . . 23.95 0.0915 0.02 Q . . . . 24.09 0.0917 0.02 Q . . . . 24.23 0.0918 0.00 Q . . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME DURATION(minutes) OF PERCENTILES OF ESTIMATED PEAK FLOW RATE: (Note: 100% of Peak Flow Rate estimate assumed to have an instantaneous time duration) Percentile of Estimated Duration Peak Flow Rate (minutes) ======================= ========= 0% 1448.0 10% 75.3 20% 25.1 30% 16.7 40% 8.4 50% 8.4 60% 8.4 70% 8.4 80% 8.4 90% 8.4 Channel Analysis: Post-Project Input Parameters Channel Type: Rectangular Channel Width: 27.0000 ft Longitudinal Slope: 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n: 0.0150 Flow: 1.1600 cfs Result Parameters Depth: 0.0381 ft Area of Flow: 1.0274 ft^2 Wetted Perimeter: 27.0761 ft Hydraulic Radius: 0.0379 ft Average Velocity: 1.1290 ft/s Top Width: 27.0000 ft Froude Number: 1.0200 Critical Depth: 0.0386 ft Critical Velocity: 1.1143 ft/s Critical Slope: 0.0097 ft/ft Critical Top Width: 27.00 ft Calculated Max Shear Stress: 0.0237 lb/ft^2 Calculated Avg Shear Stress: 0.0237 lb/ft^2 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<EL.=184.90IE.=182.90<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<EL.=188.2L=193'EL.=187.24IE.=183.90L=323'EL.=188.0<L=19'EL.=188.2EL.=187.9IE.=182.80L=20'1.0 ACEL.=1555.0PASCOLARETSUITER& ASSOCIATES27127 Calle Arroyo, Ste 1904, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675ph 949.661.6695 | fx 949. 661.6674 | plsaengineering.com APPENDIX H • Noise Modeling Results NOISE RECEPTOR & MONITORING LOCATION MAPPark Plaza Memory Care ProjectImagery via Google OPBIUBOTLJFOWJSPONFOUBMDPOTVMUJOH Page 1 'BTIJPO1BSL4USFFU/PJTF3FQPSU Summary Date Thursday, March 14, 2019 Start Time 9:51aam End Time 10:06am File Name 831_Data.008 Device Model Larson Davis Model 831 Weighting A Response Slow Results Description Value Description Value Leq 58.9dB L10 62.9dB Lmax 73.7dB L50 54.3dB Lmin 50.0dB L90 52.0dB Statistics Chart 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 50.050.651.251.852.453.053.654.254.855.456.056.657.257.858.459.059.660.260.861.462.062.663.263.864.465.065.666.266.867.468.068.669.269.870.471.071.672.272.873.4%dBA Page 2 Statistics Table dB 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 % 50.0 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.15 0.13 0.28 0.19 0.14 0.05 0.15 1.2 51.0 0.36 0.40 0.61 0.72 0.68 0.85 0.82 1.11 1.20 1.07 7.8 52.0 1.14 0.91 1.04 1.17 1.32 1.74 1.42 1.65 1.80 1.76 13.95 53.0 1.85 2.01 2.06 2.59 2.46 2.14 1.86 1.87 2.14 1.72 20.69 54.0 2.11 1.99 1.91 1.94 1.59 1.52 1.54 1.49 1.54 1.25 16.88 55.0 1.15 1.58 1.29 0.98 0.73 0.82 0.96 0.70 0.73 0.69 9.63 56.0 0.65 0.76 0.70 0.66 0.82 0.68 0.60 0.52 0.48 0.52 6.40 57.0 0.52 0.46 0.61 0.52 0.37 0.42 0.38 0.33 0.31 0.28 4.20 58.0 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.22 2.43 59.0 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 1.76 60.0 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.19 1.65 61.0 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.18 0.18 0.15 1.57 62.0 0.17 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.24 0.25 0.16 0.15 0.19 0.16 1.88 63.0 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.19 0.22 1.87 64.0 0.17 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.23 1.88 65.0 0.19 0.18 0.24 0.16 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.17 0.19 1.74 66.0 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.14 1.41 67.0 0.11 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.14 68.0 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.94 69.0 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.49 70.0 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.29 71.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.06 72.0 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 73.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.09 Logged Data Chart 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 Page 1 (MBTTFMM4U/FBS)PMZ'BNJMZ$BUIFESBM/PJTF3FQPSU Summary Date Thursday, March 14, 2019 Start Time 10:10am End Time 10:25am File Name 831_Data.009 Device Model Larson Davis Model 831 Weighting A Response Slow Results Description Value Description Value Leq 73.1dB L10 76.6dB Lmax 82.5dB L50 73.6dB Lmin 52.0dB L90 64.2dB Statistics Chart 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 52.052.853.654.455.256.056.857.658.459.260.060.861.662.463.264.064.865.666.467.268.068.869.670.471.272.072.873.674.475.276.076.877.678.479.280.080.881.682.4%dBA Page 2 Statistics Table dB 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 % 52.0 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.10 0.13 0.05 0.03 0.6 53.0 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.2 54.0 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.17 55.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 56.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.16 57.0 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.37 58.0 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.06 0.12 0.10 0.65 59.0 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.59 60.0 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.28 0.24 0.15 0.10 0.16 0.29 1.52 61.0 0.20 0.34 0.26 0.23 0.15 0.21 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.13 1.91 62.0 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.12 1.39 63.0 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.26 0.33 0.24 1.85 64.0 0.20 0.20 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.34 0.30 0.26 0.27 2.53 65.0 0.29 0.38 0.34 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.47 0.42 0.47 3.55 66.0 0.37 0.35 0.47 0.54 0.42 0.35 0.43 0.38 0.42 0.37 4.10 67.0 0.44 0.40 0.33 0.39 0.42 0.46 0.43 0.62 0.88 0.68 5.05 68.0 0.87 0.74 0.64 0.66 0.60 0.74 0.78 1.02 1.07 0.80 7.92 69.0 0.81 1.04 0.95 0.71 0.71 0.68 0.64 0.60 0.64 0.62 7.41 70.0 0.63 0.66 0.66 0.62 0.65 0.78 0.70 0.65 0.55 0.64 6.54 71.0 0.83 0.68 0.45 0.47 0.42 0.47 0.49 0.63 0.66 0.58 5.69 72.0 0.87 0.91 0.71 0.76 0.79 0.83 0.89 0.94 0.91 0.88 8.49 73.0 0.94 1.02 0.93 0.89 0.82 0.83 0.95 0.93 0.85 1.00 9.15 74.0 0.96 0.94 0.83 0.90 0.78 0.73 0.86 0.57 0.62 0.72 7.92 75.0 0.63 0.64 0.74 0.70 0.68 0.87 0.74 0.70 0.79 0.82 7.31 76.0 0.88 0.73 0.72 0.82 0.76 0.54 0.60 0.58 0.55 0.55 6.73 77.0 0.48 0.51 0.53 0.51 0.40 0.39 0.45 0.47 0.28 0.28 4.31 78.0 0.23 0.26 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.15 1.59 79.0 0.15 0.20 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.08 1.18 80.0 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.58 81.0 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.35 82.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 Page 3 Logged Data Chart 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 Page 1 (MBTTFMM4U/FBS(MBTTFMM4U3FTJEFODFT/PJTF3FQPSU Summary Date Thursday, March 14, 2019 Start Time 10:28am End Time 10:43am File Name 831_Data.010 Device Model Larson Davis Model 831 Weighting A Response Slow Results Description Value Description Value Leq 66.8dB L10 69.0dB Lmax 84.7dB L50 57.3dB Lmin 48.1dB L90 52.0dB Statistics Chart 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 48.048.949.850.751.652.553.454.355.256.157.057.958.859.760.661.562.463.364.265.166.066.967.868.769.670.571.472.373.274.175.075.976.877.778.679.580.481.382.283.184.0%dBA Page 2 Statistics Table dB 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 % 48.0 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.14 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.6 49.0 0.09 0.17 0.22 0.20 0.10 0.06 0.12 0.21 0.10 0.07 1.3 50.0 0.07 0.09 0.25 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.33 0.25 0.19 0.31 2.65 51.0 0.35 0.43 0.34 0.31 0.25 0.49 0.29 0.56 0.51 0.81 4.35 52.0 1.18 0.90 0.78 0.63 0.75 0.73 0.96 0.89 0.92 0.77 8.50 53.0 0.73 0.64 0.83 0.79 0.99 1.05 0.82 0.92 0.88 0.74 8.40 54.0 0.76 0.83 0.90 0.76 0.94 0.97 0.77 0.91 0.91 0.78 8.53 55.0 0.75 0.67 0.73 0.67 0.65 0.80 0.78 0.69 0.56 0.75 7.04 56.0 0.73 0.67 0.67 0.73 0.82 0.58 0.51 0.55 0.59 0.65 6.51 57.0 0.58 0.62 0.54 0.50 0.52 0.57 0.52 0.48 0.46 0.50 5.31 58.0 0.41 0.40 0.41 0.44 0.42 0.51 0.49 0.48 0.47 0.53 4.55 59.0 0.41 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.47 0.40 0.35 0.34 0.37 0.34 3.98 60.0 0.37 0.36 0.47 0.42 0.41 0.48 0.43 0.46 0.31 0.30 4.01 61.0 0.29 0.36 0.33 0.34 0.40 0.44 0.41 0.35 0.34 0.33 3.59 62.0 0.39 0.41 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.47 0.54 0.42 0.36 0.33 4.07 63.0 0.24 0.32 0.35 0.38 0.36 0.29 0.30 0.27 0.36 0.32 3.19 64.0 0.33 0.24 0.22 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.23 2.29 65.0 0.20 0.22 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.23 0.26 2.61 66.0 0.29 0.24 0.31 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.38 3.15 67.0 0.37 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.28 2.90 68.0 0.25 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.21 0.28 0.22 0.23 2.27 69.0 0.31 0.24 0.26 0.16 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.17 2.10 70.0 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.27 0.15 0.15 1.86 71.0 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.13 1.37 72.0 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.14 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09 1.21 73.0 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.09 0.10 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.75 74.0 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.33 75.0 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.30 76.0 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.39 77.0 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.42 78.0 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.19 79.0 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.18 80.0 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.30 81.0 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 82.0 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.20 83.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.74 0.86 84.0 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.20 Page 3 Logged Data Chart 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSPark Plaza Memory CareNTEC 29 July 2019 Noah Tanski TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: Park Plaza Memory Care RUN: Grader: North Receptors BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB Holy Family Cathedral Residences 1 1 0.0 63.9 66 63.9 10 ----63.9 0.0 8 -8.0 Holy Family Cathedral 2 1 0.0 63.4 66 63.4 10 ----63.4 0.0 8 -8.0 Holy Family Cathedral Classrooms 3 1 0.0 57.3 66 57.3 10 ----57.3 0.0 8 -8.0 Glassell Street Residences 5 1 0.0 63.7 66 63.7 10 ----63.7 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected4 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Impacted0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All that meet NR Goal0 0.0 0.0 0.0C:\USERS\NOJATA\DESKTOP\PARK PLAZA CONSTRUCTION TNM\Grader Activity 1 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSPark Plaza Memory CareNTEC 29 July 2019 Noah Tanski TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: Park Plaza Memory Care RUN: Grader: South Receptors BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB Holy Family Cathedral Outdoors 1 1 0.0 50.3 66 50.3 10 ----50.3 0.0 8 -8.0 Park Plaza Existing - 1st 2 1 0.0 59.4 66 59.4 10 ----59.4 0.0 8 -8.0 Park Plaza Existing - 2nd 4 1 0.0 67.3 66 67.3 10 Snd Lvl67.3 0.0 8 -8.0 Park Plaza Existing - 3rd 5 1 0.0 69.0 66 69.0 10 Snd Lvl69.0 0.0 8 -8.0 Fashion Park St Residences 6 1 0.0 42.9 66 42.9 10 ----42.9 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected5 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Impacted2 0.0 0.0 0.0 All that meet NR Goal0 0.0 0.0 0.0C:\USERS\NOJATA\DESKTOP\PARK PLAZA CONSTRUCTION TNM\Grader - South Receptors RESULTS: SOUND LEVELSPark Plaza Memory CareNTEC 29 July 2019 Noah Tanski TNM 2.5 Calculated with TNM 2.5 RESULTS: SOUND LEVELS PROJECT/CONTRACT: Park Plaza Memory Care RUN: Trucks: Glassell Street BARRIER DESIGN: INPUT HEIGHTS Average pavement type shall be used unless a State highway agency substantiates the use ATMOSPHERICS: 68 deg F, 50% RH of a different type with approval of FHWA.ReceiverNameNo.#DUsExistingNo BarrierWith BarrierLAeq1hLAeq1h Increase over existing TypeCalculatedNoise ReductionCalculatedCrit'nCalculatedCrit'nImpactLAeq1hCalculatedGoalCalculatedSub'l IncminusGoaldBA dBA dBA dB dB dBA dB dB dB 45ft E of centerline 1 1 0.0 60.3 66 60.3 10 ----60.3 0.0 8 -8.0 70ft W of centerline 2 1 0.0 57.6 66 57.6 10 ----57.6 0.0 8 -8.0 Dwelling Units # DUs Noise Reduction Min Avg Max dB dB dB All Selected2 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Impacted0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All that meet NR Goal0 0.0 0.0 0.0C:\USERS\NOJATA\DESKTOP\PARK PLAZA CONSTRUCTION TNM\Trucks - Glassell 1 Construction Vibration ‐ PPV Ground Factor (N): 1.5 Equipment: Large Dozer Equipment PPV (in/sec): 0.089 Reference Distance (ft): 25 Unmitigated Receptor Distance (ft) Vibration Level (in/sec PPV) Holy Family Cathedral Residences 15 0.191 Holy Family Cathedral 100 0.011 Glassell Street Residences 95 0.012 Park Plaza Assisted Living Facility 10 0.352 Park Plaza Memory Care APPENDIX I • Traffic Impact Analysis TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PARK PLAZA MEMORY CARE PROJECT Orange, California August 12, 2019 Prepared for: KISCO SENIOR LIVING 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008 LLG Ref. 2-18-4075-2 Prepared by: Under the Supervision of: Jeremy Mempin Trissa de Jesus Allen, P.E. Transportation Engineer I Senior Transportation Engineer LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Site Access ............................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Existing Street System ........................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions ............................................................................................ 4 3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections)................................................................................................ 5 3.3.2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) ........................................................................................... 5 3.3.2.1 Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections .................................................................... 5 3.4 Level of Service Criteria ........................................................................................................ 5 3.5 Existing Level of Service Results .......................................................................................... 6 4.0 Traffic Forecasting Methodology ......................................................................................... 10 5.0 Project Traffic Characteristics ............................................................................................. 11 5.1 Project Traffic Generation .................................................................................................... 11 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment ....................................................................... 11 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions .............................................................................. 12 6.0 Year 2021 Cumulative Forecasts .......................................................................................... 14 6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth ....................................................................................................... 14 6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics ........................................................................ 14 6.3 Year 2021 Cumulative Base Traffic Volumes ..................................................................... 15 6.4 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Volumes .......................................................... 15 7.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology ................................................................................. 17 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................................................ 17 8.0 Existing Plus Project Analysis .............................................................................................. 18 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ...................................................................... 18 9.0 Year 2021 Plus Project Analysis ........................................................................................... 20 9.1.1 Year 2021 Cumulative Base Traffic Conditions ........................................................... 20 9.1.2 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ............................................... 20 10.0 Recommended Improvements .............................................................................................. 22 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAGE 10.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions .......................................................................... 22 10.2 Year 2021 Plus Project Traffic Conditions....................................................................... 22 11.0 Summary Of Findings And Conclusions ............................................................................. 23 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Traffic Study Scope of Work B. Existing Traffic Count Data C. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc iii LIST OF FIGURES SECTION—FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE 1–1 Vicinity Map ....................................................................................................................... 2 2–1 Existing Site Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 3 2–2 Proposed Site Plan .............................................................................................................. 3 3–1 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls ........................................... 6 3–2 Existing (2019) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................................................... 6 3–3 Existing (2019) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................ 6 5–1 Project Traffic Distribution Pattern ............................................................................... 13 5–2 AM Peak Hour Project-Generated Traffic Volumes .................................................... 13 5–3 PM Peak Hour Project-Generated Traffic Volumes .................................................... 13 5–4 Existing (2019) Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................... 13 5–5 Existing (2019) Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................... 13 6–1 Location of Cumulative Projects ..................................................................................... 16 6–2 Year 2021 Cumulative Project Only AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..................... 16 6–3 Year 2021 Cumulative Project Only PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................... 16 6–4 Year 2021 Cumulative Base AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................... 16 6–5 Year 2021 Cumulative Base PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................... 16 6–6 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................... 16 6–7 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................... 16 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc iv LIST OF TABLES SECTION—TABLE # PAGE 3–1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections ....................................................... 7 3–2 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM 6 Methodology) ........... 8 3–3 Existing (Year 2019) Peak Hour Levels of Service ........................................................... 9 5–1 Project Traffic Generation Forecast ................................................................................ 13 6–1 Cumulative Projects Description and Trip Generation Estimates .................................. 16 8–1 Existing (Year 2019) Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ............. 19 9–1 Year 2021 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................................... 21 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PARK PLAZA MEMORY CARE PROJECT Orange, California August 12, 2019 1.0 INTRODUCTION This traffic impact analysis addresses the potential traffic impacts and circulation needs associated with the proposed Park Plaza Memory Care Project (hereinafter referred to as Project). The proposed project consists of expanding the existing Park Plaza Senior Living facility and developing 30,113 square feet (SF) of gross floor area, with 36 beds in 28 studio units and 4 two-bedroom units, for a two-story memory care/assisted living community to provide care for residents impacted by Alzheimer’s and other dementia-related disorders. The Project site is currently vacant and located at 620 S. Glassell Street in the City of Orange, California. This report documents the findings and recommendations of a traffic impact analysis conducted by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to determine the potential impacts associated with the Project. The traffic analysis evaluates the existing operating conditions at four (4) key study intersections within the project vicinity, estimates the trip generation potential of the Project, and forecasts future operating conditions without and with the proposed Project. Where necessary, intersection improvements/mitigation measures are identified. This traffic report satisfies the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, and is consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the most current Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Orange County. The Scope of Work for this traffic study, which is included in Appendix A, was developed in conjunction with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff. The project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area roadways and intersections was performed. Existing traffic information has been collected at four (4) key study intersections on a “typical” weekday for use in the preparation of intersection level of service calculations. Information concerning cumulative projects (planned and/or approved) in the vicinity of the proposed Project has been researched at the City of Orange and City of Santa Ana. Based on our research, there are four (4) cumulative projects in the City of Orange and one (1) cumulative projects in the City of Santa Ana within the vicinity of the subject site. These five (5) planned and/or approved cumulative projects were considered in the cumulative traffic analysis for this project. This traffic report analyzes existing and future weekday AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic conditions for a near-term (Year 2021) traffic setting upon completion of the proposed Project. Traffic forecasts for the Year 2021 horizon year have been projected by increasing existing traffic volumes by an annual growth rate of one percent (1.0%) per year and adding traffic volumes generated by five (5) cumulative projects. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 2 1.1 Study Area The four (4) key study intersections selected for evaluation were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The intersections listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. It should be noted that each key study intersection is located within the City of Orange. Key Study Intersections 1. Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue 2. Glassell Street at East River Avenue 3. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 4. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Figure 1-1 presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the proposed Project and depicts the study locations and surrounding street system. The Level of Service (LOS) investigations at these key locations were used to evaluate the potential traffic-related impacts associated with area growth, cumulative projects and the proposed Project. When necessary, this report recommends intersection improvements that may be required to accommodate future traffic volumes and restore/maintain an acceptable Level of Service and/or mitigate the impact of the project. The following four traffic scenarios are addressed in the study: • Existing (2019) - The analysis of existing traffic conditions is intended to provide a base of analysis for the remainder of the study. The existing conditions analysis includes an assessment of the streets in the area, current traffic volumes, and operating conditions. • Existing (2019) Plus Project - This phase of analysis adds project-generated forecasts to existing conditions. Any potential traffic impacts will be determined, and additional improvement measures to address the deficiencies will be identified. • Year 2021 Cumulative Base - This phase of analysis projects future traffic growth and operating conditions in the Year 2021 which could be expected to result from regional growth and related projects without the addition of project traffic. • Year 2021 Cumulative plus Project - This is an analysis of future traffic conditions in the Year 2021 with the addition of project-generated traffic. Any potential traffic impacts will be determined, and mitigation measures developed. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 3 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Project site is located at 620 S. Glassell Street in the City of Orange, California and is directly north of the existing Park Plaza Senior Living facility. It should be noted that the existing 5,595 SF vacant building (previously restaurant) will be demolished to construct the proposed Project. Figure 2-1 presents an aerial depiction of the existing site, which shows the existing vacant restaurant building to be demolished. Figure 2-2 presents the proposed site plan for the proposed Project, prepared by Shelter Architects. The proposed project consists of developing 30,113 square feet (SF) of gross floor area, with 36 beds in 28 studio units and 4 two-bedroom units, for a two-story memory care/assisted living community to provide care for residents impacted by Alzheimer’s and other dementia-related disorders. The proposed Project is expected to be constructed and fully occupied by the Year 2021. 2.1 Site Access As shown in Figure 2-2, access to the proposed Project will be provided via one full access unsignalized driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 1) and one existing unsignalized right-turn in/out only driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 2) located along Glassell Street. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 4 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing Street System The principal local network of streets serving the proposed Project includes Glassell Street and La Veta Avenue. The following discussion provides a brief synopsis of these key area streets. The descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. Glassell Street is generally a four-lane, divided roadway oriented in the north-south direction and borders the Project site to the east. Glassell Street transitions to a two-lane, undivided roadway north of La Veta Avenue. On-street parking is not permitted on the west side of Glassell Street south of East River Avenue and not permitted on the east side of Glassell Street north of East River Avenue. The posted speed limit on Glassell Street is 35 miles per hour (mph) south of La Veta Avenue and 30 mph north of La Veta Avenue. A traffic signal controls the study intersection of Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue. The study intersections of Glassell Street at East River Avenue, Park Plaza Driveway 1 and Park Plaza Driveway 2 are stop-controlled. La Veta Avenue is generally a four-lane, divided roadway west of Glassell Street and a two-lane undivided roadway east of Orange Street oriented in the east-west direction. On-street parking is generally not permitted along this roadway west of La Veta Avenue and on-street parking is permitted east of Orange Street within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on La Veta Avenue is 35 mph west of Glassell Street and 30 mph east of Glassell Street. Figure 3-1 presents an inventory of the existing roadway conditions for the arterials and intersections evaluated in this report. This figure identifies the number of travel lanes for key arterials, as well as intersection configurations and controls for the key area study intersections. 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Four (4) key study intersections have been identified as the locations at which to evaluate existing and future traffic operating conditions. Some portion of potential project-related traffic will pass through each of these intersections, and their analysis will reveal the expected relative impacts of the project. These key intersections were selected for evaluation based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. Existing AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the four (4) key study intersections evaluated in this report were conducted by AimTD LLC in May 2019. Figures 3-2 and 3-3 illustrate the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the four (4) key study intersections. Appendix B contains the detailed peak hour count sheets for the key intersections evaluated in this report. 3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions Existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the four (4) key study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 5 and the methodology outlined in Chapter 20 of the HCM 6 for two-way stop-controlled intersections. 3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) In conformance with City of Orange requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the key signalized study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU technique is intended for signalized intersection analysis and estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal (green) time and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. Per City of Orange requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for through and all turn lanes. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.05 was added to each Level of Service calculation. The ICU value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning movements. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range and are shown in Table 3-1. 3.3.2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) The HCM unsignalized methodology for stop-controlled intersections was utilized for the analysis of the unsignalized intersections. LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections differ from LOS criteria for signalized intersections as signalized intersections are designed for heavier traffic and therefore a greater delay. 3.3.2.1 Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections Two-way stop-controlled intersections are comprised of a major street, which is uncontrolled, and a minor street, which is controlled by stop signs. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay. The control delay by movement, by approach, and for the intersection as a whole is estimated by the computed capacity for each movement. LOS is determined for each minor-street movement (or shared movement) as well as major-street left turns. The worst side street approach delay is reported. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole or for major-street approaches, as it is assumed that major-street through vehicles experience zero delay. The HCM control delay value range for two-way stop- controlled intersections is shown in Table 3-2. 3.4 Level of Service Criteria According to the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum acceptable LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 6 condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak commute hours on all intersections. 3.5 Existing Level of Service Results Table 3-3 summarizes the existing peak hour service level calculations for the four (4) key study intersections based on existing traffic volumes and current street geometry. Review of Table 3-3 indicates that all key study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). Appendix C presents the ICU/LOS and Delay/LOS calculations for the four (4) key study intersections for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 7 TABLE 3-1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1 Level of Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization Value (V/C) Level of Service Description A ≤ 0.60 EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one red light, and no approach phase is fully used. B 0.61 – 0.70 VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C 0.71 – 0.80 GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D 0.81 – 0.90 FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. E 0.91 – 1.00 POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. F > 1.00 FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Potentially very long delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. 1 Source: Transportation Research Board Circular 212 – Interim Materials on Highway Capacity. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 8 TABLE 3-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6 METHODOLOGY)2,3 Level of Service (LOS) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Delay Per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Description A ≤ 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 and ≤ 15.0 Short traffic delays C > 15.0 and ≤ 25.0 Average traffic delays D > 25.0 and ≤ 35.0 Long traffic delays E > 35.0 and ≤ 50.0 Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion 2 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 20: Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. The LOS criteria apply to each lane on a given approach and to each approach on the minor street. LOS is not calculated for major-street approaches or for the intersection as a whole. 3 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 21: All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. For approaches and intersection-wide assessment, LOS is defined solely by control delay. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 9 TABLE 3-3 EXISTING (YEAR 2019) INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE Minimum Acceptable Control Time Poor #Key Intersection Jurisdiction LOS Type Period ICU Delay (s/v)LOS? Glassell Street at 8Φ Traffic AM 0.631 --B No La Veta Avenue Signal PM 0.617 --B No Glassell Street at One-Way AM --13.7 B No East River Avenue Stop PM --15.2 C No Glassell Street at One-Way AM --0.0 [a]A No Park Plaza Driveway 1 Stop PM --0.0 [a]A No Glassell Street at One-Way AM --0.0 [b]A No Park Plaza Driveway 2 Stop PM --12.1 B No Notes: LOS = Level of Service, please refer to Tables 3-1 and 3-2 for the LOS definitions ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) Φ = Phase [a]The existing site of the proposed Project is currently vacant and there is no existing volume coming out of Driveway 1. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. [b]There is no existing outbound volume coming out of Driveway 2 during the AM Peak Hour. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. Orange D Orange D LOS 1 Orange D Orange D2 3 4 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 10 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the proposed Project, a multi-step process has been utilized. The first step is trip generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing traffic on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is forecast by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the project development tabulation. The second step of the forecasting process is trip distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/anticipated travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the proposed Project is isolated by comparing operational (LOS) conditions at selected key intersections using expected future traffic volumes with and without forecast project traffic. The need for site- specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated and the significance of the project’s impacts identified. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 11 5.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 5.1 Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 10th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2017]. Table 5-1 summarizes the trip generation rates used in forecasting the vehicular trips generated by the proposed Project and the existing land use (i.e. existing vacant restaurant building) and also presents the project’s forecast peak hour and daily traffic volumes. For this analysis, the trip generation potential of the existing land use was estimated using ITE Land Use 931: Quality Restaurant trip rates and the trip generation potential of the proposed Project was estimated using ITE Land Use 254: Assisted Living trip rates. As shown at the bottom of Table 5-1, the proposed Project will generate 320 less “net” daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 2 greater “net” trips (0 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 34 less “net” trips (-24 inbound, -10 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a “typical” weekday compared to the existing use. It should be noted that the existing 5,595 SF Chinese Restaurant is currently non-operational. Therefore, the Proposed Project’s gross trip generation of 149 daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 6 trips (4 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 10 trips (5 inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour was utilized in this traffic impact analysis to provide the most conservative assessment. 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 5-1 illustrates the general, directional traffic distribution pattern for the proposed Project. Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the project site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: directional flows on the freeways in the immediate vicinity of the project site (i.e. SR-22 Freeway, etc.), the site's proximity to major traffic carriers (i.e. Glassell Street), expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of traffic signals, and ingress/egress availability at the project site. The anticipated AM and PM peak hour project traffic volumes associated with the Project are presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3, respectively. The traffic volume assignments presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3 reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown in Figure 5-1 and the traffic generation forecast presented in Table 5-1. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 12 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The existing plus project traffic conditions have been generated based upon existing conditions and the estimated project traffic. These forecast traffic conditions have been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, which require that the potential impacts of a Project be evaluated upon the circulation system as it currently exists. This traffic volume scenario and the related intersection capacity analyses will identify the roadway improvements necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impacts of the Project, if any. Figures 5-4 and 5-5 present projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the four (4) key study intersections with the addition of the trips generated by the proposed Project to existing traffic volumes, respectively. It should be noted that an assumption was made to account for a portion of existing outbound volume from the southernmost driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 2) that would utilize the full-access northernmost driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 1) to go northbound on Glassell Street. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 13 TABLE 5-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST 4 ITE Land Use Code / Project Description Daily 2-Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Generation Rates: ITE 254: Assisted Living (TE/Occupied Beds) 4.14 68% 32% 0.18 50% 50% 0.29 ITE 931: Quality Restaurant (TE/TSF) 83.84 90%5 10%5 0.73 67% 33% 7.80 Generation Forecasts: [A]. Proposed Project Park Plaza Expansion – Memory Care Facility (36 Beds) 149 4 2 6 5 5 10 [B]. Existing Land Use Chinese Restaurant (5,595 SF) 469 4 0 4 29 15 44 Total “Net Increase” Project Trip Generation: Proposed Project Minus Existing Land Use [A] – [B] -320 0 2 2 -24 -10 -34 Notes: TE/Occupied Beds = Trip End per Occupied Beds TE/TSF = Trip End per Thousand Square Feet 4 Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017). 5 ITE does not provide enter/exit splits for the AM Peak Hour, therefore 90% entering and 10% exiting was assumed. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 14 6.0 YEAR 2021 CUMULATIVE FORECASTS The Cumulative Base or “background” traffic projections account for existing traffic volumes, and include two growth elements over existing traffic volumes: (1) increase in the existing traffic volumes due to overall regional growth; and, (2) traffic generated by specific developments expected to be constructed by Year 2021 in the vicinity of the Project study area. The following sections describe these two growth elements in existing traffic volumes. No physical, capacity-enhancing improvements to intersection geometry or roadway segments have been assumed under Year 2021 Cumulative Base conditions because no transportation system projects within the study area are expected to be fully developed/completed by Year 2021. 6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Horizon year, background traffic growth estimates have been calculated using an ambient traffic growth factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future cumulative projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to the development of projects outside the study area. The future growth in traffic volumes has been calculated at one percent (1.0%) per year. Applied to the Year 2019 existing traffic volumes, this factor results in a 2.0% growth in existing volumes to the near-term horizon Year 2021. 6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics In order to make a realistic estimate of future on-street conditions prior to implementation of the proposed Project, the status of other known development projects (cumulative projects) in the vicinity of the proposed Project has been researched at the City of Orange and City of Santa Ana. With this information, the potential impact of the proposed Project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. Based on our research, there are four (4) cumulative projects in the City of Orange and one (1) cumulative project in the City of Santa Ana within the vicinity of the subject site that have either been built, but not yet fully occupied, or are being processed for approval. These five (5) cumulative projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting. Figure 6-1 graphically illustrates the location of the cumulative projects. These cumulative projects are expected to generate vehicular traffic, which may affect the operating conditions of the key study intersections. Table 6-1 provides a brief description and presents the trip generation for the five (5) cumulative projects. As shown in Table 6-1, the five (5) cumulative projects are forecast to generate a combined total of 7,233 daily trips, with 549 trips (123 inbound and 426 outbound) forecast during the AM peak hour and 649 trips (416 inbound and 233 outbound) forecast during the PM peak hour. Figures 6-2 and 6-3 present the Cumulative Projects Only AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, respectively. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 15 6.3 Year 2021 Cumulative Base Traffic Volumes Figures 6-4 and 6-5 present the AM and PM peak hour Year 2021 Cumulative Base traffic volumes (existing traffic + ambient growth traffic + cumulative project traffic) at the four (4) key study intersections, respectively. 6.4 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Volumes Figures 6-6 and 6-7 illustrate the Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, respectively. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 16 TABLE 6-1 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS DESCRIPTION AND TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Daily Land Use In Out Total In Out Total 1 Ronald McDonald House Expansion Assisted Living 23 Beds 95 3 1 4 4 3 7 (City of Orange) 2 Dang Residences Single Family Detached Housing 7 DU 66 1 4 5 4 3 7 655 South Glassell Street (City of Orange) 3 999 Town and Country Apartments Apartments 262 DU [b]1,742 26 108 134 105 58 163 999 Town and Country road (City of Orange) 4 Town and Country Apartments 653 DU [c]4,342 67 266 333 263 142 405 Apartments and Townhomes Townhomes 74 DU [c]430 6 27 33 25 13 38 702 West Town and Country Road (City of Orange)Sub-total: 4,772 73 293 366 288 155 443 5 Starbucks Coffee Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window 0.907 TSF 744 41 40 81 20 19 39 2701 North Grand Avenue Pass-by Reduction -186 -21 -20 -41 -5 -5 -10 (City of Santa Ana)Sub-total: 558 20 20 40 15 14 29 7,233 123 426 549 416 233 649 Note: [a] Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institue of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017), unless otherwise noted. [b] Source: 999 Town & Country Apartments Project Traffic Impact Analylsis , prepared by LLG Engineers. [c] Source: Town and Country Apartments and Townhomes Project Traffic Impact Analylsis , prepared by LLG Engineers. Cumulative Projects Trip Generation Potential Cumulative Project / Location Size 383 and 389 South Batavia Street, 802 West Culver Avenue Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 17 7.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The relative impact of the proposed Project during the AM peak hour/PM peak hour was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the four (4) key study intersections, without, then with the proposed Project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume-to-capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersections. The significance of the potential impacts of the Project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the following traffic impact criteria. 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds Impacts to local and regional transportation systems located in the City of Orange are considered significant if: Intersections: An unacceptable peak hour Level of Service (LOS) at any of the key intersections is projected. According to the City’s Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak hours on all intersections; and The project increases traffic demand at the study intersection by 1% of capacity (ICU increase ≥ 0.010), causing or worsening LOS E or LOS F (ICU > 0.900). An unsignalized intersection impact is considered to be significant if the project causes an intersection operating at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or LOS F, and the traffic signal warrant analysis determines that a traffic signal is justified. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 18 8.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ANALYSIS Table 8-1 summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the four (4) key study intersections for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and Delay/LOS values in Table 8-1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 3-3). The second column (2) lists existing plus project traffic conditions. The second column (2) also shows the increase in ICU and/or Delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Column (2) of Table 8-1 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. All four (4) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. Appendix C also presents the existing plus project ICU/LOS and Delay/LOS calculations for the four (4) key study intersections for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 19 TABLE 8-1 EXISTING (YEAR 2019) PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS #Key Intersection Time Period ICU Delay (s/v)LOS Deficient?ICU Delay (s/v)LOS ICU or Delay Change (2) - (1) Significant Impact? Glassell Street at AM 0.631 --B No 0.632 --B 0.001 No La Veta Avenue PM 0.617 --B No 0.618 --B 0.001 No Glassell Street at AM --13.7 B No --13.7 B 0.0 No East River Avenue PM --15.2 C No --15.3 C 0.1 No Glassell Street at AM --0.0 [a]A No --19.2 C 19.2 No Park Plaza Driveway 1 PM --0.0 [a]A No --15.2 C 15.2 No Glassell Street at AM --0.0 [b]A No --0.0 [b]A 0.0 No Park Plaza Driveway 2 PM --12.1 B No --12.1 B 0.0 No Notes: LOS = Level of Service, please refer to Tables 3-1 and 3-2 for the LOS definitions ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) [a]The existing site of the proposed Project is currently vacant and there is no existing volume coming out of Driveway 1. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. [b]There is no existing outbound volume coming out of Driveway 2 during the AM Peak Hour. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. 4 (1)(2) Existing (Year 2019)Existing plus Project (Year 2019) 1 2 3 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TI, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 20 9.0 YEAR 2021 PLUS PROJECT ANALYSIS Table 9-1 summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the four (4) key study intersections for Year 2021 traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and Delay/LOS values in Table 9-1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 3-3). The second column (2) lists projected cumulative traffic conditions (existing plus ambient traffic plus cumulative project traffic) based on existing intersection geometry, but without any traffic generated from the proposed Project. The third column (3) presents forecast Year 2021 near-term traffic conditions with the addition of Project traffic. The third column (3) also shows the increase in ICU and/or Delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. 9.1.1 Year 2021 Cumulative Base Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Year 2021) cumulative traffic conditions indicates that all four (4) key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of ambient traffic growth and cumulative project traffic. 9.1.2 Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Column (3) of Table 9-1 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. All four (4) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2021 cumulative traffic. Appendix C also presents the Year 2021 (without and with project) ICU/LOS and Delay/LOS calculations for the four (4) key study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.4075.2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 21 TABLE 9-1 YEAR 2021 CUMULATIVE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS #Key Intersection Time Period ICU Delay (s/v)LOS Deficient?ICU Delay (s/v)LOS Deficient?ICU Delay (s/v)LOS ICU or Delay Change (3) - (2) Significant Impact? Glassell Street at AM 0.631 --B No 0.652 --B No 0.653 --B 0.001 No La Veta Avenue PM 0.617 --B No 0.631 --B No 0.631 --B 0.000 No Glassell Street at AM --13.7 B No --14.0 B No --14.0 B 0.0 No East River Avenue PM --15.2 C No --15.7 C No --15.7 C 0.0 No Glassell Street at AM --0.0 [a]A No --0.0 [a]A No --19.9 C 19.9 No Park Plaza Driveway 1 PM --0.0 [a]A No --0.0 [a]A No --15.6 C 15.6 No Glassell Street at AM --0.0 [b]A No --0.0 [b]A No --0.0 [b]A 0.0 No Park Plaza Driveway 2 PM --12.1 B No --12.2 B No --12.2 B 0.0 No Notes: LOS = Level of Service, please refer to Tables 3-1 and 3-2 for the LOS definitions ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay) [a]The existing site of the proposed Project is currently vacant and there is no existing volume coming out of Driveway 1. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. [b]There is no existing outbound volume coming out of Driveway 2 during the AM Peak Hour. Therefore, zero delay is reported for this intersection. Existing (Year 2019) 4 (1)(3)(2) Year 2021 plus Project 1 2 3 Year 2021 Cumulative Baseline LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 22 10.0 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS For those intersections where projected traffic volumes are expected to result in significant cumulative impacts, this report recommends traffic improvements that change the intersection and/or roadway segment geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements involve roadway widening and/or re-striping to reconfigure (add lanes) roadways to specific approaches of a key intersection and/or roadway segment. The identified improvements are expected to: Address the impact of existing traffic, Project traffic and future non-project (ambient traffic growth and Cumulative) traffic, and Improve Levels of Service to an acceptable range and/or to pre-project conditions. 10.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the “Existing Plus Project” intersection capacity analysis presented previously in Table 8-1 indicates that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key study intersections. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. 10.2 Year 2021 Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the “Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project” intersection capacity analysis presented previously in Table 9-1 indicates that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key study intersections. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 23 11.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Project Description – The proposed Project site is located at 620 S. Glassell Street in the City of Orange, California and is directly north of the existing Park Plaza Senior Living facility. It should be noted that the existing 5,595 SF vacant building (previously restaurant) will be demolished to construct the proposed Project. The proposed project consists of developing 30,113 square feet (SF) of gross floor area, with 36 beds in 28 studio units and 4 two-bedroom units, for a two-story memory care/assisted living community to provide care for residents impacted by Alzheimer’s and other dementia-related disorders. The proposed Project is expected to be constructed and fully occupied by the Year 2021. Access to the proposed Project will be provided via one full access unsignalized driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 1) and one existing unsignalized right-turn in/out only driveway (i.e. Park Plaza Driveway 2) located along Glassell Street. Study Scope – The four (4) key study intersections selected for evaluation were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The intersections listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. It should be noted that each key study intersection is located within the City of Orange. Key Study Intersections 1. Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue 2. Glassell Street at East River Avenue 3. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 4. Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Detailed peak hour level of service analyses were prepared for Existing Traffic Conditions, Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions, Year 2021 Cumulative Base Traffic Conditions, and Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions at these locations. Existing Traffic Conditions – All key study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). Project Trip Generation – The proposed Project will generate 320 less “net” daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 2 greater “net” trips (0 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 34 less “net” trips (-24 inbound, -10 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a “typical” weekday compared to the existing use. It should be noted that the existing 5,595 SF Chinese Restaurant is currently non-operational. Therefore, the Proposed Project’s gross trip generation of 149 daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 6 trips (4 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 10 trips (5 inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour was utilized in this traffic impact analysis to provide the most conservative assessment. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\4075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange 08-12-19.doc 24 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics – The five (5) cumulative projects are forecast to generate a combined total of 7,233 daily trips, with 549 trips (123 inbound and 426 outbound) forecast during the AM peak hour and 649 trips (416 inbound and 233 outbound) forecast during the PM peak hour. Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions – The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. All four (4) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions – The proposed Project will not significantly any of the four (4) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. All four (4) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2021 cumulative traffic. Existing Plus Project Recommended Improvements – The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key study intersections. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Recommended Improvements – The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key study intersections. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\misc\4075-2 Dividers.doc APPENDIX A TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE OF WORK A-1 MEMORANDUM N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\TIA Scope of Work\4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA Scope of Work 05-22-19.doc To: Mr. Doug Keys City of Orange Date: May 22, 2019 From: Trissa de Jesus Allen, P.E. Jeremy Mempin Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers LLG Ref: 2.18.4075.2 Subject: TIA Scope of Work for the Park Plaza Expansion – Memory Care Facility Orange, California Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit the following Traffic Study Scope of Work for the proposed Park Plaza Expansion – Memory Care Facility for your review and approval. Traffic Study Scope of Work The Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed Park Plaza Expansion – Memory Care Facility Project will satisfy the traffic impact requirements of the City of Orange and will be consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the most current Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Orange County. A.Project Location: The proposed expansion of the existing Park Plaza Senior Living development is located at 620 S. Glassell Street in the City of Orange, California. See the attached vicinity map and existing site aerial photograph of the Project site – Figure 1-1 and Figure 2-1. B.Project Description: The proposed project consists of developing 32,100 square feet (SF) of gross floor area, with 37 beds in 36 studio units, for a two-story memory care/assisted living community to provide care for residents impacted by Alzheimer’s and other dementia-related disorders. The project will provide a total of 18 spaces on site. See the attached Proposed Site Plan – Figure 2-2. C.Project Study Area: The following four (4) key study intersections have been selected for evaluation based on our discussions and based on application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. Potential Key Study Intersections 1.Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue (City of Orange) 2. Glassell Street at East River Avenue (City of Orange) 3.Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 (City of Orange) 4.Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 (City of Orange) A-2 Mr. Doug Keys May 22, 2019 Page 2 N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\TIA Scope of Work\4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA Scope of Work 05-22-19.doc D.Traffic Counts: The traffic counts for the above listed intersections will be conducted on a Tuesday (5/21/19), Wednesday (5/22/19) or Thursday (5/23/19). E.Project Traffic Generation: See the attached project traffic generation forecast –Table 5-1. As shown in the upper portion of Table 5-1, the trip generation potential of the existing land use will be estimated using ITE Land Use 931: Quality Restaurant trip rates and the trip generation potential of the proposed Project will be estimated using ITE Land Use 254: Assisted Living trip rates contained in the 10th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), [Washington, D.C., 2017]. As shown at the bottom of Table 5-1, the proposed Project will generate 316 less “net” daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 3 greater “net” trips (1 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 33 less “net” trips (-23 inbound, - 10 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a “typical” weekday compared to the existing use. It should be noted that the existing 5,595 SF Chinese Restaurant is currently non- operational. Therefore, the Proposed Project’s gross trip generation of 153 daily trips (one half arriving and one half departing), with 7 trips (5 inbound, 2 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 11 trips (6 inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour will be utilized in this traffic impact analysis to provide the most conservative assessment. F.Project Trip Distribution Pattern: See the attached project traffic distribution pattern – Figure 5-1. The project trip distribution pattern was developed based on the following considerations: directional flows on the freeways in the immediate vicinity of the project site, the site's proximity to major traffic carriers, expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of traffic signals, and ingress/egress availability at the project site. G.Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic: Ambient Growth Rate: 1.0% per year. Cumulative Projects: Obtain information regarding cumulative projects in the vicinity of the proposed project (i.e. 2-mile radius) from the City of Orange and City of Santa Ana. A-3 Mr. Doug Keys May 22, 2019 Page 3 N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\TIA Scope of Work\4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA Scope of Work 05-22-19.doc H.Analysis Scenarios: The following traffic analysis scenarios will be prepared for the proposed Project. (a)Existing Traffic Conditions; (b)Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions; (c)Scenario (b) with Mitigation, if necessary; (d)Year 2021 Cumulative Traffic Conditions (Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Cumulative Projects); (e)Year 2021 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions; and (f)Scenario (e) with Mitigation, if necessary. The LOS calculations will be based on the ICU methodology for signalized intersections and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for unsignalized intersections. The Project’s potential impact will be based on the significant impact criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. I.Other Issues: An assumption will be made for Existing Driveway volumes at Project Driveway 2 that are going northbound, will be re-routed to the proposed Driveway 1. Traffic Signal Warrants, as needed. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this scope of work. Should you have any questions, please call us at (949) 825-6175. Thank you. Approved by: ________________________________________ City of Orange Date A-4 N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\TIA Scope of Work\4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA Scope of Work 05-22-19.doc TABLE 5-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST1 ITE Land Use Code / Project Description Daily 2-Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Generation Rates: ITE 254: Assisted Living (TE/Occupied Beds)4.14 68% 32% 0.18 50% 50% 0.29 ITE 931: Quality Restaurant (TE/TSF)83.84 90%2 10%2 0.73 67% 33% 7.80 Generation Forecasts: [A]. Proposed Project Park Plaza Expansion – Memory Care Facility (37 Beds)153 5 2 7 6 5 11 [B]. Existing Land Use Chinese Restaurant (5,595 SF)469 4 0 4 29 15 44 Total “Net Increase” Project Trip Generation: Proposed Project Minus Existing Land Use [A] – [B] -316 1 2 3 -23 -10 -33 Notes: TE/Occupied Beds = Trip End per Occupied Beds TE/TSF = Trip End per Thousand Square Feet 1 Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017). 2 ITE does not provide enter/exit splits for the AM Peak Hour, therefore 90% entering and 10% exiting was assumed. A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\misc\4075-2 Dividers.doc APPENDIX B EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA B-1 T218 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #: SC2220 Tue, May 21, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #: 1 EAST & WEST:CONTROL: SIGNAL NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES:211 1 2011112 0 0000 7:00 AM 30 67 15 2 116 6 8 23 90 46 40 3 446 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 29 68 27 3 141 14 6 42 92 61 68 1 552 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 65 84 24 4 175 15 8 48 108 79 80 1 691 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 67 97 31 8 138 12 13 61 128 68 94 1 718 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 65 111 43 6 161 17 7 43 90 70 89 4 706 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 61 98 21 2 121 16 8 43 77 40 76 1 564 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 43 89 26 3 115 16 6 42 76 37 55 4 512 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 52 121 32 6 81 11 8 27 63 43 48 2 494 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 412 735 219 34 1,048 107 64 329 724 444 550 17 4,683 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 30% 54% 16% 3% 88% 9% 6% 29% 65% 44% 54% 2% APP/DEPART 1,366 /816 1,189 /2,216 1,117 /582 1,011 /1,069 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 258 390 119 20 595 60 36 195 403 257 339 7 2,679 APPROACH % 34% 51% 16% 3% 88% 9% 6% 31% 64% 43% 56% 1% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.876 0.870 0.785 0.925 0.933 APP/DEPART 767 /433 675 /1,255 634 /334 603 /657 0 4:00 PM 67 121 47 7 113 8 15 57 70 30 65 5 605 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 89 118 44 3 106 9 23 87 83 30 57 0 649 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 75 109 50 3 116 12 10 59 91 24 57 5 611 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 82 114 48 3 95 10 19 81 101 30 68 5 656 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 69 106 36 3 107 10 18 102 117 39 82 5 694 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 91 97 42 6 124 5 14 98 101 36 77 5 696 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 80 134 49 5 109 7 13 77 83 33 78 6 674 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 58 115 60 6 89 12 14 71 97 37 69 4 632 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 611 914 376 36 859 73 126 632 743 259 553 35 5,217 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 32% 48% 20% 4% 89% 8% 8% 42% 50% 31% 65% 4% APP/DEPART 1,901 /1,075 968 /1,861 1,501 /1,044 847 /1,237 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 322 451 175 17 435 32 64 358 402 138 305 21 2,720 APPROACH % 34% 48% 18% 4% 90% 7% 8% 43% 49% 30% 66% 5% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.901 0.896 0.869 0.921 0.977 APP/DEPART 948 /536 484 /975 824 /550 464 /659 0 Glassell NORTH SIDE La Veta WEST SIDE EAST SIDE La Veta SOUTH SIDE Glassell N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL NS SS ESWSTOTAL 7:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 AM BEGIN PEAK HR 0000 0 4:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 0000 0AMPMAM7:30 AM PM4:45 PM PEDESTRIAN + BIKE CROSSINGS 7:30 AM PM BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM BICYCLE CROSSINGSPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS U-TURNS Glassell Glassell La Veta La Veta INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Orange Glassell La Veta Add U-Turns to Left Turns B-2 T218 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #: SC2220 Tue, May 21, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #: 2 EAST & WEST:CONTROL: STOP W NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄ W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES:X21 1 2XXXX0X 0 0000 7:00 AM 01101 1248000030 3 366 01001 7:15 AM 01280 0297000020 0 427 00000 7:30 AM 01751 0348000020 2 528 00000 7:45 AM 01882 1341000000 0 532 00000 8:00 AM 02262 0309000000 1 538 00000 8:15 AM 01700 0253000030 0 426 00000 8:30 AM 01584 0219000010 1 383 00000 8:45 AM 02010 0199000020 0 402 00000 VOLUMES 01,35610 22,2140000130 73,60301001 APPROACH % 0% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 65% 0% 35% APP/DEPART 1,366 /1,364 2,217 /2,227 0 /12 20 /00 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 07175 11,295000040 32,025 APPROACH % 0% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57% 0% 43% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.792 0.931 0.000 0.438 0.941 APP/DEPART 722 /720 1,296 /1,299 0 /67 /00 4:00 PM 02316 1224000010 2 465 00000 4:15 PM 02452 0210000000 0 457 10001 4:30 PM 02364 1216000000 0 457 00000 4:45 PM 02452 0227000010 1 476 00000 5:00 PM 02304 1261000010 1 498 00000 5:15 PM 02213 0272000000 0 496 00000 5:30 PM 02503 0214000010 0 468 00000 5:45 PM 02343 0235000010 0 473 00000 VOLUMES 01,89227 31,859000050 43,79110001 APPROACH % 0% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 56% 0% 44% APP/DEPART 1,920 /1,896 1,862 /1,865 0 /30 9 /00 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 094612 1974000030 21,938 APPROACH % 0% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 60% 0% 40% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.947 0.896 0.000 0.625 0.973 APP/DEPART 958 /948 975 /977 0 /13 5 /00 Glassell NORTH SIDE East River WEST SIDE EAST SIDE East River SOUTH SIDE Glassell N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL NS SS ESWSTOTAL 7:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 AM BEGIN PEAK HR 0000 0 4:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 0000 0AMPMAM7:15 AM PM4:45 PM PEDESTRIAN + BIKE CROSSINGS 7:15 AM PM BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM BICYCLE CROSSINGSPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS U-TURNS Glassell Queue AM/PM NB Glassell East River East River INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Orange Glassell East River Add U-Turns to Left Turns B-3 T218 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #: SC2220 Tue, May 21, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #: 3 EAST & WEST:CONTROL: STOP E NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES:020 0 2001001 0 0000 7:00 AM 01210 0249030000 0 373 00000 7:15 AM 01390 0335000000 0 474 00000 7:30 AM 02150 0356000000 0 571 00000 7:45 AM 02440 0333000000 0 577 00000 8:00 AM 02320 0329000000 0 561 00000 8:15 AM 01820 0255000010 0 438 00000 8:30 AM 01700 0230000000 0 400 00000 8:45 AM 01890 0230000010 0 420 00000 VOLUMES 01,4920 02,317030020 03,81400000 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% APP/DEPART 1,492 /1,495 2,317 /2,319 3 /02 /00 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 08300 01,353000000 02,183 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.850 0.950 0.000 0.000 0.946 APP/DEPART 830 /830 1,353 /1,353 0 /00 /00 4:00 PM 02240 0207000000 0 431 00000 4:15 PM 02450 0211000000 0 456 00000 4:30 PM 02380 0218000000 0 456 00000 4:45 PM 02570 0243000000 0 500 00000 5:00 PM 02370 0245000000 0 482 00000 5:15 PM 02130 0279000000 0 492 00000 5:30 PM 02590 0239000000 0 498 00000 5:45 PM 02380 0242000000 0 480 00000 VOLUMES 01,9110 01,884000000 03,79500000 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% APP/DEPART 1,911 /1,911 1,884 /1,884 0 /00 /00 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 09660 01,006000000 01,972 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.932 0.898 0.000 0.000 0.984 APP/DEPART 966 /966 1,006 /1,006 0 /00 /00 Glassell NORTH SIDE Park Plaza Driveway 1 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Park Plaza Driveway 1 SOUTH SIDE Glassell N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL NS SS ESWSTOTAL 7:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 AM BEGIN PEAK HR 0000 0 4:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 0000 0AMPMAM7:15 AM PM4:45 PM PEDESTRIAN + BIKE CROSSINGS 7:15 AM PM BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM BICYCLE CROSSINGSPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS U-TURNS Glassell Queue AM NB Glassell Park Plaza Driveway 1 Park Plaza Driveway 1 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Orange Glassell Park Plaza Driveway 1 Add U-Turns to Left Turns B-4 T218 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #: SC2220 Tue, May 21, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #: 4 EAST & WEST:CONTROL: STOP E NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES:X2X X 20XX0XX X 0000 7:00 AM 01210 0242100200 0 366 00000 7:15 AM 01360 0298100000 0 435 00000 7:30 AM 02140 0356000000 0 570 00000 7:45 AM 02430 0373100000 0 617 00000 8:00 AM 02370 0327100000 0 565 00000 8:15 AM 01830 0243100000 0 427 00000 8:30 AM 01720 0215000100 0 388 00000 8:45 AM 01940 0264100000 0 459 00000 VOLUMES 01,5000 02,318600300 03,82700000 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% APP/DEPART 1,500 /1,500 2,324 /2,321 3 /00 /60 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 08300 01,354300000 02,187 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.854 0.907 0.000 0.000 0.886 APP/DEPART 830 /830 1,357 /1,354 0 /00 /30 4:00 PM 02410 0213000000 0 454 00000 4:15 PM 02460 0210100400 0 461 00000 4:30 PM 02370 0220000100 0 458 00000 4:45 PM 02320 0244000300 0 479 00000 5:00 PM 02440 0246000300 0 493 00000 5:15 PM 02200 0278000200 0 500 00000 5:30 PM 02640 0239000000 0 503 00000 5:45 PM 02370 0242100000 0 480 00000 VOLUMES 0 1,921 0 0 1,892 2 0 0 13 0 0 0 3,828 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% APP/DEPART 1,921 /1,921 1,894 /1,905 13 /00 /20 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 09650 01,005100500 01,976 APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.914 0.905 0.417 0.000 0.982 APP/DEPART 965 /965 1,006 /1,010 5 /00 /10 Glassell NORTH SIDE Park Plaza Driveway 2 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Park Plaza Driveway 2 SOUTH SIDE Glassell N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL NS SS ESWSTOTAL 7:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 7:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:00 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:15 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:30 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 8:45 AM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 AM BEGIN PEAK HR 0000 0 4:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 4:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:00 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:15 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:30 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 5:45 PM 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 TOTAL 00 0 00 0000 0 00000 0000 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Orange Glassell Park Plaza Driveway 2 PM BEGIN PEAK HR 5:00 PM BICYCLE CROSSINGSPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS U-TURNS Glassell Glassell Park Plaza Driveway 2 Park Plaza Driveway 2 AMPMAM7:15 AM PM5:00 PM PEDESTRIAN + BIKE CROSSINGS 7:15 AM Add U-Turns to Left Turns B-5 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-4075-2 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\misc\4075-2 Dividers.doc APPENDIX C INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATION WORKSHEETS C-1 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\misc\4075-2 Sub-Dividers.doc APPENDIX C-I EXISTING (YEAR 2019) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS C-2 0.631Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7339257403195366059520119390258Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 28564101499151495309865Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 7339257403195366059520119390258Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 7339257403195366059520119390258Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-3 0.631Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.150.160.110.020.190.190.010.000.230.08V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-4 0.012Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 15.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 34129515717Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1132401179Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 34129515717Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 34129515717Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-5 CIntersection LOS 0.05d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.710.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.271.270.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.050.050.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAAAMovement LOS 10.8115.890.009.110.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-6 0.014Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 00013538300Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0003382080Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 00013538300Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00013538300Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-7 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 19.040.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAABMovement LOS 14.1023.980.000.000.0012.14d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-8 0.014Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 00313548300Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0013392080Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 00313548300Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00313548300Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-9 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.130.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 14.130.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-10 0.617Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 21305138402358643243517175451322Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 576351019016810944411381Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 21305138402358643243517175451322Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 21305138402358643243517175451322Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-11 0.617Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.080.140.210.040.140.140.010.020.270.09V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-12 0.010Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 17.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 23974112946Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1124403237Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23974112946Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23974112946Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-13 CIntersection LOS 0.04d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.230.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.061.060.000.110.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.040.040.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCABAAMovement LOS 11.9017.450.0010.050.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-14 0.010Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 00010069660Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0002522420Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 00010069660Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00010069660Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-15 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 15.000.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAABMovement LOS 12.0117.990.000.000.0010.26d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-16 0.010Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 50110059650Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1002512410Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 50110059650Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 50110059650Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-17 BIntersection LOS 0.03d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 12.070.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.740.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.030.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 12.070.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-18 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\misc\4075-2 Sub-Dividers.doc APPENDIX C-II EXISTING (YEAR 2019) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS C-19 0.632Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7339257404195366059620119390258Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 28564101499151495309865Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 7339257404195366059620119390258Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 7339257404195366059620119390258Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-20 0.632Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.150.160.110.020.190.190.010.000.230.08V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-21 0.012Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 15.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 34129715718Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1132401180Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 34129715718Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 34129715718Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-22 CIntersection LOS 0.05d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.720.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.271.270.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.050.050.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAAAMovement LOS 10.8115.910.009.120.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-23 0.005Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 24.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 11213538303Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0013382081Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 11213538303Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 11213538303Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-24 CIntersection LOS 0.03d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 19.180.000.04d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.590.590.000.000.000.4595th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.020.020.000.000.000.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAABMovement LOS 14.2324.140.000.000.0012.19d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.000.010.010.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-25 0.014Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 00313558330Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0013392080Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 00313558330Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00313558330Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-26 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.140.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 14.140.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-27 0.618Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 21305138403358643243617175452323Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 576351019016810944411381Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 21305138403358643243617175452323Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 21305138403358643243617175452323Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-28 0.618Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.080.140.210.040.140.140.010.020.270.10V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-29 0.010Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 17.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 23976112948Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1124403237Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23976112948Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23976112948Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-30 CIntersection LOS 0.04d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.250.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.071.070.000.110.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.040.040.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCABAAMovement LOS 11.9117.480.0010.060.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-31 0.011Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 18.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 33210069654Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1112522411Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 33210069654Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 33210069654Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-32 CIntersection LOS 0.07d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.210.000.04d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.271.270.000.000.000.4495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.050.050.000.000.000.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAABMovement LOS 12.1918.220.000.000.0010.30d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.010.000.010.010.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-33 0.008Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 40110089680Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1002522420Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 40110089680Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 40110089680Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-34 BIntersection LOS 0.02d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 12.080.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.590.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.020.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 12.080.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM Ex+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-35 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\misc\4075-2 Sub-Dividers.doc APPENDIX C-III YEAR 2021 CUMULATIVE BASE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS C-36 0.652Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7346262425199456361120121403270Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2876610650111615353010168Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 7346262425199456361120121403270Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 7346262425199456361120121403270Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-37 0.652Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.150.170.120.030.200.200.010.000.240.08V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-38 0.012Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 34133915743Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1133501186Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 34133915743Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 34133915743Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-39 CIntersection LOS 0.05d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.980.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.311.310.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.050.050.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAAAMovement LOS 10.9316.270.009.210.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-40 0.014Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 00013988590Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0003502150Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 00013988590Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00013988590Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-41 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 19.730.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BDAAABMovement LOS 14.4225.050.000.000.0012.43d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-42 0.014Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 00313988550Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0013502140Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 00313988550Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00313988550Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-43 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.440.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 14.440.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-44 0.631Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 21311141421365694144817179464343Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5783510591171011244511686Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 21311141421365694144817179464343Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 21311141421365694144817179464343Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-45 0.631Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.080.150.210.040.140.140.010.020.270.10V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-46 0.011Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 18.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 231008112984Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1125203246Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 231008112984Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231008112984Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-47 CIntersection LOS 0.04d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.660.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.111.110.000.110.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.040.040.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCABAAMovement LOS 12.1118.030.0010.220.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-48 0.010Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000104110040Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0002602510Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 000104110040Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 000104110040Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-49 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.380.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAABMovement LOS 12.1918.560.000.000.0010.42d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-50 0.010Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 501103610000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1002592500Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 501103610000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 501103610000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-51 BIntersection LOS 0.03d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 12.240.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.750.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.030.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 12.240.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2021 Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-52 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino N:\4000\2184075-2 - Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange\Report\misc\4075-2 Sub-Dividers.doc APPENDIX C-IV YEAR 2021 CUMULATIVE WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS C-53 0.653Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7346262426199456361220121403270Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2876610750111615353010168Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 7346262426199456361220121403270Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 7346262426199456361220121403270Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-54 0.653Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.150.170.120.030.200.200.010.000.240.08V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-55 0.012Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 34134115744Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1133501186Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 34134115744Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 34134115744Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-56 CIntersection LOS 0.05d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.990.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.311.310.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.050.050.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAAAMovement LOS 10.9316.290.009.210.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-57 0.006Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 25.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 11213988593Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0013502151Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 11213988593Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 11213988593Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-58 DIntersection LOS 0.03d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 19.890.000.04d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.620.620.000.000.000.4795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.020.020.000.000.000.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BDAAABMovement LOS 14.5525.220.000.000.0012.49d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.000.010.010.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-59 0.014Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 0.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 00313998580Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0013502150Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 00313998580Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00313998580Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-60 AIntersection LOS 0.00d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.440.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 14.440.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 7: 7 AM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-61 0.631Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Glassell Street at La Veta Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001101001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 21311141422365694144917179465344Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5783510691171011244511686Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 21311141422365694144917179465344Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 21311141422365694144917179465344Base Volume Input [veh/h] La Veta AveLa Veta AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-62 0.631Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.100.100.080.150.210.040.140.140.010.020.270.10V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,86,7Auxiliary Signal Groups 047883025661Signal Group PermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteOverlapPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-63 0.011Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 18.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Glassell Street at East River Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 231010112986Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1125303247Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 231010112986Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231010112986Base Volume Input [veh/h] East River AveGlassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-64 CIntersection LOS 0.04d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.680.010.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.111.110.000.110.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.040.040.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCABAAMovement LOS 12.1218.060.0010.230.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.010.010.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-65 0.011Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 18.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 332104110034Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1112602511Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 332104110034Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 332104110034Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 1Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-66 CIntersection LOS 0.07d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.600.000.04d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.321.320.000.000.000.4695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.050.050.000.000.000.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BCAAABMovement LOS 12.3918.810.000.000.0010.47d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.010.000.010.010.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 200Number of Storage Spaces in Median YesTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-67 0.008Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Glassell Street at Park Plaza Driveway 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 401103910030Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1002602510Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 401103910030Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 401103910030Base Volume Input [veh/h] Park Plaza Dwy 2Glassell StGlassell StName Volumes Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-68 BIntersection LOS 0.02d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 12.240.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.600.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.020.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 12.240.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 8: 8 PM 2021+P Park Plaza Memory Care TIA, Orange Version 7.00-06 Generated with C-69