Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutChick-fil-A Draft IS-MND Technical Appendices_Aug2019Technical Appendices | August 2019 PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1858-18 City of Orange i August 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 8.0 Appendices 8.1 Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Data 8.2 Cultural Resources 8.3 Geotechnical Investigation 8.4 Hazardous Materials Documentation 8.5 Hydrology and Water Quality Reports 8.6 Noise Data 8.7 Traffic Impact Analysis and Circulation Plan 8.8 OCTA Correspondance PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1858-18 City of Orange ii August 2019 This page intentionally left blank. APPENDIX 8.1 Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Data 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 4.56 1000sqft 0.10 4,563.00 0 Parking Lot 48.00 Space 0.43 19,200.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Orange Chick-fil-A Orange County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 1 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Per construction questionnaire and project description. Construction Phase - Anticipated construction schedule. Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Per construction questionnaire. Off-road Equipment - Grading - Per email from applicant. Demolition - Vehicle Trips - Per traffic study. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD standards and regulations. Waste Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 26 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 110.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/17/2019 12/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/3/2019 12/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/14/2019 5/15/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/16/2019 5/30/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/10/2019 7/1/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/11/2019 11/18/2019 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 2 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/17/2019 7/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/15/2019 5/16/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/4/2019 5/31/2019 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 950.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 722.03 353.28 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 542.72 353.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 496.12 353.28 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 3 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 8.0023 36.1167 24.7217 0.0528 10.1193 1.8554 10.7058 1.6361 1.7174 2.1959 0.0000 5,222.942 3 5,222.942 3 1.5224 0.0000 5,261.003 4 Maximum 8.0023 36.1167 24.7217 0.0528 10.1193 1.8554 10.7058 1.6361 1.7174 2.1959 0.0000 5,222.942 3 5,222.942 3 1.5224 0.0000 5,261.003 4 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 8.0023 36.1167 24.7217 0.0528 4.1165 1.8554 4.7030 0.7110 1.7174 1.7517 0.0000 5,222.942 3 5,222.942 3 1.5224 0.0000 5,261.003 4 Maximum 8.0023 36.1167 24.7217 0.0528 4.1165 1.8554 4.7030 0.7110 1.7174 1.7517 0.0000 5,222.942 3 5,222.942 3 1.5224 0.0000 5,261.003 4 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.32 0.00 56.07 56.54 0.00 20.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 4 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Energy 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Mobile 2.1248 6.6271 17.1435 0.0466 3.5981 0.0544 3.6525 0.9622 0.0511 1.0133 4,728.112 7 4,728.112 7 0.2490 4,734.337 0 Total 2.2704 6.9450 17.4159 0.0485 3.5981 0.0786 3.6767 0.9622 0.0753 1.0374 5,109.519 0 5,109.519 0 0.2563 6.9900e- 003 5,118.010 5 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Energy 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Mobile 2.1248 6.6271 17.1435 0.0466 3.5981 0.0544 3.6525 0.9622 0.0511 1.0133 4,728.112 7 4,728.112 7 0.2490 4,734.337 0 Total 2.2704 6.9450 17.4159 0.0485 3.5981 0.0786 3.6767 0.9622 0.0753 1.0374 5,109.519 0 5,109.519 0 0.2563 6.9900e- 003 5,118.010 5 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 5 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2019 5/15/2019 5 11 2 Grading Grading 5/16/2019 5/30/2019 5 11 3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/2/2019 12/2/2019 5 110 4 Paving Paving 5/31/2019 7/1/2019 5 22 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/18/2019 12/2/2019 5 11 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 6,845; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,282; Striped Parking Area: 1,152 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.43 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 6 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Off-Highway Trucks 2 8.00 402 0.38 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Other Construction Equipment 1 8.00 172 0.42 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Trenchers 1 8.00 78 0.50 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 471.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 119.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 7 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 9.2619 0.0000 9.2619 1.4023 0.0000 1.4023 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 9.2619 0.5371 9.7990 1.4023 0.5125 1.9148 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 8 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.3559 12.6920 3.0427 0.0332 0.7456 0.0487 0.7943 0.2041 0.0466 0.2507 3,693.379 2 3,693.379 2 0.3856 3,703.018 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.3971 12.7190 3.3994 0.0344 0.8574 0.0495 0.9069 0.2338 0.0473 0.2811 3,805.993 2 3,805.993 2 0.3883 3,815.701 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.4315 0.0000 3.4315 0.5196 0.0000 0.5196 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 3.4315 0.5371 3.9686 0.5196 0.5125 1.0320 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 9 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.3559 12.6920 3.0427 0.0332 0.5984 0.0487 0.6471 0.1680 0.0466 0.2146 3,693.379 2 3,693.379 2 0.3856 3,703.018 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.0865 7.5000e- 004 0.0873 0.0234 6.9000e- 004 0.0241 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.3971 12.7190 3.3994 0.0344 0.6849 0.0495 0.7344 0.1914 0.0473 0.2387 3,805.993 2 3,805.993 2 0.3883 3,815.701 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7625 0.0000 0.7625 0.4153 0.0000 0.4153 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.7625 0.5371 1.2996 0.4153 0.5125 0.9277 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 10 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0899 3.2067 0.7688 8.3900e- 003 0.1884 0.0123 0.2007 0.0516 0.0118 0.0634 933.1468 933.1468 0.0974 935.5821 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.1311 3.2337 1.1255 9.5200e- 003 0.3002 0.0131 0.3132 0.0812 0.0125 0.0937 1,045.760 8 1,045.760 8 0.1002 1,048.265 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.2825 0.0000 0.2825 0.1539 0.0000 0.1539 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.2825 0.5371 0.8196 0.1539 0.5125 0.6663 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 11 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0899 3.2067 0.7688 8.3900e- 003 0.1512 0.0123 0.1635 0.0424 0.0118 0.0542 933.1468 933.1468 0.0974 935.5821 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.0865 7.5000e- 004 0.0873 0.0234 6.9000e- 004 0.0241 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.1311 3.2337 1.1255 9.5200e- 003 0.2377 0.0131 0.2508 0.0659 0.0125 0.0784 1,045.760 8 1,045.760 8 0.1002 1,048.265 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Total 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 12 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0150 0.4539 0.1200 1.0000e- 003 0.0256 3.0700e- 003 0.0286 7.3500e- 003 2.9300e- 003 0.0103 109.1876 109.1876 9.2200e- 003 109.4180 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.0562 0.4809 0.4767 2.1300e- 003 0.1373 3.8200e- 003 0.1411 0.0370 3.6200e- 003 0.0406 221.8016 221.8016 0.0120 222.1012 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 0.0000 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Total 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 0.0000 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 13 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0150 0.4539 0.1200 1.0000e- 003 0.0208 3.0700e- 003 0.0239 6.1900e- 003 2.9300e- 003 9.1200e- 003 109.1876 109.1876 9.2200e- 003 109.4180 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 003 0.0865 7.5000e- 004 0.0873 0.0234 6.9000e- 004 0.0241 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 003 112.6833 Total 0.0562 0.4809 0.4767 2.1300e- 003 0.1073 3.8200e- 003 0.1111 0.0296 3.6200e- 003 0.0333 221.8016 221.8016 0.0120 222.1012 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8300 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Paving 0.0512 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8812 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 14 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0742 0.0486 0.6421 2.0300e- 003 0.2012 1.3400e- 003 0.2025 0.0534 1.2400e- 003 0.0546 202.7053 202.7053 4.9800e- 003 202.8298 Total 0.0742 0.0486 0.6421 2.0300e- 003 0.2012 1.3400e- 003 0.2025 0.0534 1.2400e- 003 0.0546 202.7053 202.7053 4.9800e- 003 202.8298 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8300 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 0.0000 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Paving 0.0512 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8812 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 0.0000 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 15 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0742 0.0486 0.6421 2.0300e- 003 0.1557 1.3400e- 003 0.1571 0.0422 1.2400e- 003 0.0434 202.7053 202.7053 4.9800e- 003 202.8298 Total 0.0742 0.0486 0.6421 2.0300e- 003 0.1557 1.3400e- 003 0.1571 0.0422 1.2400e- 003 0.0434 202.7053 202.7053 4.9800e- 003 202.8298 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 4.3312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 4.5976 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 16 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.2400e- 003 5.4000e- 003 0.0714 2.3000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 22.5228 22.5228 5.5000e- 004 22.5367 Total 8.2400e- 003 5.4000e- 003 0.0714 2.3000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 22.5228 22.5228 5.5000e- 004 22.5367 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 4.3312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 4.5976 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 17 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.2400e- 003 5.4000e- 003 0.0714 2.3000e- 004 0.0173 1.5000e- 004 0.0175 4.6900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.8300e- 003 22.5228 22.5228 5.5000e- 004 22.5367 Total 8.2400e- 003 5.4000e- 003 0.0714 2.3000e- 004 0.0173 1.5000e- 004 0.0175 4.6900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.8300e- 003 22.5228 22.5228 5.5000e- 004 22.5367 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 18 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.1248 6.6271 17.1435 0.0466 3.5981 0.0544 3.6525 0.9622 0.0511 1.0133 4,728.112 7 4,728.112 7 0.2490 4,734.337 0 Unmitigated 2.1248 6.6271 17.1435 0.0466 3.5981 0.0544 3.6525 0.9622 0.0511 1.0133 4,728.112 7 4,728.112 7 0.2490 4,734.337 0 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1,612.00 1,612.00 1612.00 1,696,447 1,696,447 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1,612.00 1,612.00 1,612.00 1,696,447 1,696,447 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 16.60 8.40 6.90 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 Parking Lot 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 19 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 20 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3241.86 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3.24186 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 21 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Unmitigated 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0972 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Total 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 22 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0972 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Total 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 23 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:47 AMPage 24 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 4.56 1000sqft 0.10 4,563.00 0 Parking Lot 48.00 Space 0.43 19,200.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Orange Chick-fil-A Orange County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 1 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Per construction questionnaire and project description. Construction Phase - Anticipated construction schedule. Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Per construction questionnaire. Off-road Equipment - Grading - Per email from applicant. Demolition - Vehicle Trips - Per traffic study. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD standards and regulations. Waste Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 26 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 110.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/17/2019 12/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/3/2019 12/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/14/2019 5/15/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/16/2019 5/30/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/10/2019 7/1/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/11/2019 11/18/2019 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 2 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/17/2019 7/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/15/2019 5/16/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/4/2019 5/31/2019 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 950.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 722.03 353.28 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 542.72 353.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 496.12 353.28 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 3 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 8.0093 36.1204 24.7017 0.0527 10.1193 1.8555 10.7069 1.6361 1.7175 2.1969 0.0000 5,213.052 8 5,213.052 8 1.5228 0.0000 5,251.121 8 Maximum 8.0093 36.1204 24.7017 0.0527 10.1193 1.8555 10.7069 1.6361 1.7175 2.1969 0.0000 5,213.052 8 5,213.052 8 1.5228 0.0000 5,251.121 8 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 8.0093 36.1204 24.7017 0.0527 4.1165 1.8555 4.7041 0.7110 1.7175 1.7518 0.0000 5,213.052 8 5,213.052 8 1.5228 0.0000 5,251.121 8 Maximum 8.0093 36.1204 24.7017 0.0527 4.1165 1.8555 4.7041 0.7110 1.7175 1.7518 0.0000 5,213.052 8 5,213.052 8 1.5228 0.0000 5,251.121 8 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.32 0.00 56.06 56.54 0.00 20.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 4 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Energy 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Mobile 2.1035 6.7174 17.4190 0.0445 3.5981 0.0552 3.6533 0.9622 0.0518 1.0140 4,508.225 5 4,508.225 5 0.2552 4,514.605 0 Total 2.2492 7.0353 17.6914 0.0464 3.5981 0.0793 3.6774 0.9622 0.0760 1.0382 4,889.631 8 4,889.631 8 0.2625 6.9900e- 003 4,898.278 5 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Energy 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Mobile 2.1035 6.7174 17.4190 0.0445 3.5981 0.0552 3.6533 0.9622 0.0518 1.0140 4,508.225 5 4,508.225 5 0.2552 4,514.605 0 Total 2.2492 7.0353 17.6914 0.0464 3.5981 0.0793 3.6774 0.9622 0.0760 1.0382 4,889.631 8 4,889.631 8 0.2625 6.9900e- 003 4,898.278 5 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 5 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2019 5/15/2019 5 11 2 Grading Grading 5/16/2019 5/30/2019 5 11 3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/2/2019 12/2/2019 5 110 4 Paving Paving 5/31/2019 7/1/2019 5 22 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/18/2019 12/2/2019 5 11 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 6,845; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,282; Striped Parking Area: 1,152 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.43 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 6 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Off-Highway Trucks 2 8.00 402 0.38 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Other Construction Equipment 1 8.00 172 0.42 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Trenchers 1 8.00 78 0.50 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 471.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 119.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 7 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 9.2619 0.0000 9.2619 1.4023 0.0000 1.4023 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 9.2619 0.5371 9.7990 1.4023 0.5125 1.9148 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 8 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.3652 12.8588 3.2212 0.0327 0.7456 0.0498 0.7954 0.2041 0.0477 0.2518 3,638.648 2 3,638.648 2 0.3955 3,648.535 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.4117 12.8885 3.5514 0.0338 0.8574 0.0506 0.9079 0.2338 0.0484 0.2821 3,745.225 6 3,745.225 6 0.3981 3,755.178 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.4315 0.0000 3.4315 0.5196 0.0000 0.5196 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 3.4315 0.5371 3.9686 0.5196 0.5125 1.0320 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 9 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.3652 12.8588 3.2212 0.0327 0.5984 0.0498 0.6482 0.1680 0.0477 0.2156 3,638.648 2 3,638.648 2 0.3955 3,648.535 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.0865 7.5000e- 004 0.0873 0.0234 6.9000e- 004 0.0241 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.4117 12.8885 3.5514 0.0338 0.6849 0.0506 0.7355 0.1914 0.0484 0.2398 3,745.225 6 3,745.225 6 0.3981 3,755.178 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7625 0.0000 0.7625 0.4153 0.0000 0.4153 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.7625 0.5371 1.2996 0.4153 0.5125 0.9277 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 10 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0923 3.2488 0.8138 8.2700e- 003 0.1884 0.0126 0.2010 0.0516 0.0120 0.0636 919.3188 919.3188 0.0999 921.8168 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.1388 3.2785 1.1441 9.3400e- 003 0.3002 0.0133 0.3135 0.0812 0.0127 0.0939 1,025.896 1 1,025.896 1 0.1026 1,028.459 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.2825 0.0000 0.2825 0.1539 0.0000 0.1539 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.2825 0.5371 0.8196 0.1539 0.5125 0.6663 0.0000 1,159.657 0 1,159.657 0 0.2211 1,165.184 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 11 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0923 3.2488 0.8138 8.2700e- 003 0.1512 0.0126 0.1638 0.0424 0.0120 0.0545 919.3188 919.3188 0.0999 921.8168 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.0865 7.5000e- 004 0.0873 0.0234 6.9000e- 004 0.0241 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.1388 3.2785 1.1441 9.3400e- 003 0.2377 0.0133 0.2510 0.0659 0.0127 0.0786 1,025.896 1 1,025.896 1 0.1026 1,028.459 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Total 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 12 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0156 0.4544 0.1317 9.8000e- 004 0.0256 3.1200e- 003 0.0287 7.3500e- 003 2.9900e- 003 0.0103 106.5421 106.5421 9.7000e- 003 106.7847 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.1118 7.5000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 004 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.0621 0.4841 0.4620 2.0500e- 003 0.1373 3.8700e- 003 0.1412 0.0370 3.6800e- 003 0.0407 213.1194 213.1194 0.0123 213.4277 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 0.0000 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Total 3.3402 33.7950 22.3323 0.0474 1.7227 1.7227 1.5849 1.5849 0.0000 4,697.169 8 4,697.169 8 1.4861 4,734.323 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 13 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0156 0.4544 0.1317 9.8000e- 004 0.0208 3.1200e- 003 0.0239 6.1900e- 003 2.9900e- 003 9.1800e- 003 106.5421 106.5421 9.7000e- 003 106.7847 Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 003 0.0865 7.5000e- 004 0.0873 0.0234 6.9000e- 004 0.0241 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 003 106.6430 Total 0.0621 0.4841 0.4620 2.0500e- 003 0.1073 3.8700e- 003 0.1112 0.0296 3.6800e- 003 0.0333 213.1194 213.1194 0.0123 213.4277 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8300 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Paving 0.0512 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8812 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 14 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0837 0.0535 0.5945 1.9200e- 003 0.2012 1.3400e- 003 0.2025 0.0534 1.2400e- 003 0.0546 191.8393 191.8393 4.7300e- 003 191.9574 Total 0.0837 0.0535 0.5945 1.9200e- 003 0.2012 1.3400e- 003 0.2025 0.0534 1.2400e- 003 0.0546 191.8393 191.8393 4.7300e- 003 191.9574 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8300 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 0.0000 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Paving 0.0512 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8812 7.8446 7.1478 0.0113 0.4425 0.4425 0.4106 0.4106 0.0000 1,055.182 3 1,055.182 3 0.3016 1,062.723 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 15 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0837 0.0535 0.5945 1.9200e- 003 0.1557 1.3400e- 003 0.1571 0.0422 1.2400e- 003 0.0434 191.8393 191.8393 4.7300e- 003 191.9574 Total 0.0837 0.0535 0.5945 1.9200e- 003 0.1557 1.3400e- 003 0.1571 0.0422 1.2400e- 003 0.0434 191.8393 191.8393 4.7300e- 003 191.9574 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 4.3312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 4.5976 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 16 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.3000e- 003 5.9400e- 003 0.0661 2.1000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 21.3155 21.3155 5.3000e- 004 21.3286 Total 9.3000e- 003 5.9400e- 003 0.0661 2.1000e- 004 0.0224 1.5000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 21.3155 21.3155 5.3000e- 004 21.3286 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 4.3312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 4.5976 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 17 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.3000e- 003 5.9400e- 003 0.0661 2.1000e- 004 0.0173 1.5000e- 004 0.0175 4.6900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.8300e- 003 21.3155 21.3155 5.3000e- 004 21.3286 Total 9.3000e- 003 5.9400e- 003 0.0661 2.1000e- 004 0.0173 1.5000e- 004 0.0175 4.6900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.8300e- 003 21.3155 21.3155 5.3000e- 004 21.3286 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 18 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.1035 6.7174 17.4190 0.0445 3.5981 0.0552 3.6533 0.9622 0.0518 1.0140 4,508.225 5 4,508.225 5 0.2552 4,514.605 0 Unmitigated 2.1035 6.7174 17.4190 0.0445 3.5981 0.0552 3.6533 0.9622 0.0518 1.0140 4,508.225 5 4,508.225 5 0.2552 4,514.605 0 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1,612.00 1,612.00 1612.00 1,696,447 1,696,447 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1,612.00 1,612.00 1,612.00 1,696,447 1,696,447 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 16.60 8.40 6.90 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 Parking Lot 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 19 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 20 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3241.86 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3.24186 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0350 0.3178 0.2670 1.9100e- 003 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.3947 381.3947 7.3100e- 003 6.9900e- 003 383.6612 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 21 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Unmitigated 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0972 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Total 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 22 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0972 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Total 0.1107 5.0000e- 005 5.4200e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0115 0.0115 3.0000e- 005 0.0123 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 23 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:42 AMPage 24 of 24 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 4.56 1000sqft 0.10 4,563.00 0 Parking Lot 48.00 Space 0.43 19,200.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Orange Chick-fil-A Orange County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 1 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Per construction questionnaire and project description. Construction Phase - Anticipated construction schedule. Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Per construction questionnaire. Off-road Equipment - Grading - Per email from applicant. Demolition - Vehicle Trips - Per traffic study. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD standards and regulations. Waste Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 26 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 110.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/17/2019 12/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/3/2019 12/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/14/2019 5/15/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/16/2019 5/30/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/10/2019 7/1/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/11/2019 11/18/2019 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 2 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/17/2019 7/2/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/15/2019 5/16/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/4/2019 5/31/2019 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 950.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 722.03 353.28 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 542.72 353.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 496.12 353.28 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 3 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.2361 2.1682 1.4595 3.2600e- 003 0.0711 0.1068 0.1779 0.0143 0.0986 0.1129 0.0000 294.7355 294.7355 0.0826 0.0000 296.8006 Maximum 0.2361 2.1682 1.4595 3.2600e- 003 0.0711 0.1068 0.1779 0.0143 0.0986 0.1129 0.0000 294.7355 294.7355 0.0826 0.0000 296.8006 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.2361 2.1682 1.4595 3.2600e- 003 0.0330 0.1068 0.1398 7.1900e- 003 0.0986 0.1058 0.0000 294.7352 294.7352 0.0826 0.0000 296.8003 Maximum 0.2361 2.1682 1.4595 3.2600e- 003 0.0330 0.1068 0.1398 7.1900e- 003 0.0986 0.1058 0.0000 294.7352 294.7352 0.0826 0.0000 296.8003 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.59 0.00 21.41 49.79 0.00 6.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 4 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0202 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 Energy 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 118.3225 118.3225 3.4900e- 003 1.6300e- 003 118.8951 Mobile 0.3663 1.2413 3.1665 8.2100e- 003 0.6433 9.9500e- 003 0.6533 0.1723 9.3400e- 003 0.1816 0.0000 754.9942 754.9942 0.0416 0.0000 756.0339 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.6631 0.0000 10.6631 0.6302 0.0000 26.4174 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4391 6.0551 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 Total 0.3929 1.2994 3.2159 8.5600e- 003 0.6433 0.0144 0.6577 0.1723 0.0138 0.1860 11.1022 879.3731 890.4754 0.7206 2.7500e- 003 909.3086 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 5-1-2019 7-31-2019 0.6954 0.6954 2 8-1-2019 9-30-2019 0.8207 0.8207 Highest 0.8207 0.8207 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 5 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0202 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 Energy 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 118.3225 118.3225 3.4900e- 003 1.6300e- 003 118.8951 Mobile 0.3663 1.2413 3.1665 8.2100e- 003 0.6433 9.9500e- 003 0.6533 0.1723 9.3400e- 003 0.1816 0.0000 754.9942 754.9942 0.0416 0.0000 756.0339 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.3316 0.0000 5.3316 0.3151 0.0000 13.2087 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4391 6.0551 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 Total 0.3929 1.2994 3.2159 8.5600e- 003 0.6433 0.0144 0.6577 0.1723 0.0138 0.1860 5.7707 879.3731 885.1438 0.4055 2.7500e- 003 896.0999 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.02 0.00 0.60 43.72 0.00 1.45 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 6 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2019 5/15/2019 5 11 2 Grading Grading 5/16/2019 5/30/2019 5 11 3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/2/2019 12/2/2019 5 110 4 Paving Paving 5/31/2019 7/1/2019 5 22 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/18/2019 12/2/2019 5 11 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 6,845; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,282; Striped Parking Area: 1,152 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.43 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 7 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Off-Highway Trucks 2 8.00 402 0.38 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Other Construction Equipment 1 8.00 172 0.42 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Trenchers 1 8.00 78 0.50 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 471.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 119.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 8 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0509 0.0000 0.0509 7.7100e- 003 0.0000 7.7100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 2.9500e- 003 2.9500e- 003 2.8200e- 003 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Total 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 0.0509 2.9500e- 003 0.0539 7.7100e- 003 2.8200e- 003 0.0105 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 9 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.9800e- 003 0.0721 0.0172 1.8000e- 004 4.0400e- 003 2.7000e- 004 4.3100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 2.6000e- 004 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 18.3135 18.3135 1.9500e- 003 0.0000 18.3621 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.3000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5399 0.5399 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5402 Total 2.2100e- 003 0.0723 0.0190 1.9000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 2.7000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 1.2700e- 003 2.6000e- 004 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 18.8534 18.8534 1.9600e- 003 0.0000 18.9023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0189 0.0000 0.0189 2.8600e- 003 0.0000 2.8600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 2.9500e- 003 2.9500e- 003 2.8200e- 003 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Total 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 0.0189 2.9500e- 003 0.0218 2.8600e- 003 2.8200e- 003 5.6800e- 003 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 10 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.9800e- 003 0.0721 0.0172 1.8000e- 004 3.2400e- 003 2.7000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 9.1000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 1.1700e- 003 0.0000 18.3135 18.3135 1.9500e- 003 0.0000 18.3621 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.3000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.5399 0.5399 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5402 Total 2.2100e- 003 0.0723 0.0190 1.9000e- 004 3.7100e- 003 2.7000e- 004 3.9800e- 003 1.0400e- 003 2.6000e- 004 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 18.8534 18.8534 1.9600e- 003 0.0000 18.9023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 4.1900e- 003 0.0000 4.1900e- 003 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 2.9500e- 003 2.9500e- 003 2.8200e- 003 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Total 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 4.1900e- 003 2.9500e- 003 7.1400e- 003 2.2800e- 003 2.8200e- 003 5.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 11 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 5.0000e- 004 0.0182 4.3400e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.0200e- 003 7.0000e- 005 1.0900e- 003 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.6270 4.6270 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.6393 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.3000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5399 0.5399 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5402 Total 7.3000e- 004 0.0184 6.2000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.6200e- 003 7.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 003 4.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 5.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1669 5.1669 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 5.1795 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 1.5500e- 003 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 2.9500e- 003 2.9500e- 003 2.8200e- 003 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Total 5.2400e- 003 0.0473 0.0423 7.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 2.9500e- 003 4.5000e- 003 8.5000e- 004 2.8200e- 003 3.6700e- 003 0.0000 5.7861 5.7861 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 5.8137 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 12 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 5.0000e- 004 0.0182 4.3400e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.6270 4.6270 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.6393 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.3000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.5399 0.5399 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5402 Total 7.3000e- 004 0.0184 6.2000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.2900e- 003 7.0000e- 005 1.3600e- 003 3.6000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.1669 5.1669 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 5.1795 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1837 1.8587 1.2283 2.6100e- 003 0.0948 0.0948 0.0872 0.0872 0.0000 234.3660 234.3660 0.0742 0.0000 236.2198 Total 0.1837 1.8587 1.2283 2.6100e- 003 0.0948 0.0948 0.0872 0.0872 0.0000 234.3660 234.3660 0.0742 0.0000 236.2198 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 13 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.4000e- 004 0.0255 6.9300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.3900e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.5600e- 003 4.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 5.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.3925 5.3925 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.4043 Worker 2.3000e- 003 1.6800e- 003 0.0186 6.0000e- 005 6.0400e- 003 4.0000e- 005 6.0800e- 003 1.6000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.6400e- 003 0.0000 5.3989 5.3989 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.4022 Total 3.1400e- 003 0.0271 0.0255 1.1000e- 004 7.4300e- 003 2.1000e- 004 7.6400e- 003 2.0000e- 003 2.0000e- 004 2.2000e- 003 0.0000 10.7914 10.7914 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 10.8065 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1837 1.8587 1.2283 2.6100e- 003 0.0948 0.0948 0.0872 0.0872 0.0000 234.3658 234.3658 0.0742 0.0000 236.2195 Total 0.1837 1.8587 1.2283 2.6100e- 003 0.0948 0.0948 0.0872 0.0872 0.0000 234.3658 234.3658 0.0742 0.0000 236.2195 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 14 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.4000e- 004 0.0255 6.9300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.3000e- 003 3.4000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 5.3925 5.3925 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.4043 Worker 2.3000e- 003 1.6800e- 003 0.0186 6.0000e- 005 4.6800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.7200e- 003 1.2700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 0.0000 5.3989 5.3989 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.4022 Total 3.1400e- 003 0.0271 0.0255 1.1000e- 004 5.8100e- 003 2.1000e- 004 6.0200e- 003 1.6100e- 003 2.0000e- 004 1.8100e- 003 0.0000 10.7914 10.7914 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 10.8065 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9.1300e- 003 0.0863 0.0786 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 4.8700e- 003 4.5200e- 003 4.5200e- 003 0.0000 10.5297 10.5297 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.6050 Paving 5.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.6900e- 003 0.0863 0.0786 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 4.8700e- 003 4.5200e- 003 4.5200e- 003 0.0000 10.5297 10.5297 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.6050 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 15 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.1900e- 003 5.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.9436 1.9436 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.9448 Total 8.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.1900e- 003 5.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.9436 1.9436 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.9448 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9.1300e- 003 0.0863 0.0786 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 4.8700e- 003 4.5200e- 003 4.5200e- 003 0.0000 10.5297 10.5297 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.6049 Paving 5.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.6900e- 003 0.0863 0.0786 1.2000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 4.8700e- 003 4.5200e- 003 4.5200e- 003 0.0000 10.5297 10.5297 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.6049 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 16 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 003 4.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.9436 1.9436 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.9448 Total 8.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 003 4.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.9436 1.9436 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.9448 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0238 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4700e- 003 0.0101 0.0101 2.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4073 Total 0.0253 0.0101 0.0101 2.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4073 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 17 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1080 0.1080 0.0000 0.0000 0.1080 Total 5.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1080 0.1080 0.0000 0.0000 0.1080 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0238 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4700e- 003 0.0101 0.0101 2.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4073 Total 0.0253 0.0101 0.0101 2.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4073 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 18 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1080 0.1080 0.0000 0.0000 0.1080 Total 5.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1080 0.1080 0.0000 0.0000 0.1080 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 19 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.3663 1.2413 3.1665 8.2100e- 003 0.6433 9.9500e- 003 0.6533 0.1723 9.3400e- 003 0.1816 0.0000 754.9942 754.9942 0.0416 0.0000 756.0339 Unmitigated 0.3663 1.2413 3.1665 8.2100e- 003 0.6433 9.9500e- 003 0.6533 0.1723 9.3400e- 003 0.1816 0.0000 754.9942 754.9942 0.0416 0.0000 756.0339 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1,612.00 1,612.00 1612.00 1,696,447 1,696,447 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1,612.00 1,612.00 1,612.00 1,696,447 1,696,447 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 16.60 8.40 6.90 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 Parking Lot 0.552373 0.044229 0.211123 0.119112 0.017503 0.005797 0.024455 0.015685 0.001637 0.001633 0.004830 0.000583 0.001041 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 20 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 55.1783 55.1783 2.2800e- 003 4.7000e- 004 55.3757 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 55.1783 55.1783 2.2800e- 003 4.7000e- 004 55.3757 NaturalGas Mitigated 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 63.1442 63.1442 1.2100e- 003 1.1600e- 003 63.5194 NaturalGas Unmitigated 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 63.1442 63.1442 1.2100e- 003 1.1600e- 003 63.5194 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 21 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1.18328e +006 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 63.1442 63.1442 1.2100e- 003 1.1600e- 003 63.5194 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 63.1442 63.1442 1.2100e- 003 1.1600e- 003 63.5194 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1.18328e +006 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 63.1442 63.1442 1.2100e- 003 1.1600e- 003 63.5194 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3800e- 003 0.0580 0.0487 3.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 0.0000 63.1442 63.1442 1.2100e- 003 1.1600e- 003 63.5194 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 22 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 166458 53.0372 2.1900e- 003 4.5000e- 004 53.2269 Parking Lot 6720 2.1411 9.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.1488 Total 55.1783 2.2800e- 003 4.7000e- 004 55.3757 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 166458 53.0372 2.1900e- 003 4.5000e- 004 53.2269 Parking Lot 6720 2.1411 9.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.1488 Total 55.1783 2.2800e- 003 4.7000e- 004 55.3757 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 23 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0202 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 Unmitigated 0.0202 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 Total 0.0202 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 24 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 Total 0.0202 1.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.3900e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 25 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 Unmitigated 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1.38411 / 0.0883477 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 26 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1.38411 / 0.0883477 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.4942 0.0454 1.1200e- 003 7.9608 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 27 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 5.3316 0.3151 0.0000 13.2087 Unmitigated 10.6631 0.6302 0.0000 26.4174 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 52.53 10.6631 0.6302 0.0000 26.4174 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 10.6631 0.6302 0.0000 26.4174 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 28 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 26.265 5.3316 0.3151 0.0000 13.2087 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.3316 0.3151 0.0000 13.2087 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 29 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 5/31/2018 11:46 AMPage 30 of 30 Orange Chick-fil-A - Orange County, Annual APPENDIX 8.2 Cultural Resources Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers June 15, 2018 Rincon Project No: 18-05865 Kristen Bogue Senior Environmental Specialist Michael Baker International 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Via email: kbogue@mbakerintl.com Subject: Cultural Resources Assessment for the 202 S. Main Street Chick-Fil-A Project, Orange, California Dear Ms. Bogue: Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) has been retained by Michael Baker International to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the 202 S. Main Street Chick-fil-A Project (project) in Orange, Orange County, California. The assessment is part of the preparation of an Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) or an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). The purpose of this technical report is to document the results of the cultural resources tasks performed by Rincon. These tasks include: a cultural resources records search, Native American outreach and consultation assistance to the City of Orange (City) for California’s 2014 Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) and Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) of 2004, a site visit, and the documentation and evaluation of a historic architectural resource. This project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Orange is the lead agency under CEQA. Project Site Rincon understands that the project involves the commercial development of a new Chick-fil-A restaurant in the city of Orange (Figures 1 and 2; Attachment A). The project site consists of a 41,672 square foot parcel on the southwest corner of W. Almond Avenue and S. Main Street at 202 S. Main Street. The new building will encompass 4,563 square feet and will include a drive-thru, landscaping, a patio, a trash enclosure, new asphalt paving, and 48 parking spaces. A vacant steakhouse restaurant building currently located on the project site will be demolished. Regulatory Setting Federal The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) was established by the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 as “an authoritative guide to be used by Federal, State, and local governments, private groups and citizens to identify the Nation’s cultural resources and to indicate what properties should be Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 2 considered for protection from destruction or impairment" (CFR 36 CFR 60.2). The NRHP recognizes properties that are significant at the national, state, and local levels. To be eligible for listing in the NRHP, a resource must be significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. Districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of potential significance must also possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. A property is eligible for the NRHP if it is significant under one or more of the following criteria: Criterion A: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; Criterion B: It is associated with the lives of persons who are significant in our past; Criterion C: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; and/or Criterion D: It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. In addition to meeting any or all of the criteria listed above, integrity, the ability of a property to convey its significance, must be present in order for a property to be eligible for the National Register. Integrity involves several aspects, including location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. State CEQA (Section 21084.1) requires that a lead agency determine whether a project could have a significant effect on historical resources. A historical resource is a resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (Section 21084.1), a resource included in a local register of historical resources (Section 15064.5[a][2]), or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant (Section 15064.5[a][3]). PRC Section 5024.1, Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, and PRC Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1 were used as the basic guidelines for this cultural resource study. PRC Section 5024.1 requires an evaluation of historical resources to determine their eligibility for listing in the CRHR. The purpose of the register is to maintain listings of the state’s historical resources and to indicate which properties are to be protected from substantial adverse change. The criteria for listing resources in the CRHR were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP, enumerated below. According to PRC Section 5024.1(c)(1–4), a resource is considered historically significant if it: 1) retains substantial integrity, and 2) meets at least one of the following California Register criteria. Criterion 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage. Criterion 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. Criterion 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of installation, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 3 Criterion 4. It has yielded or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. According to CEQA, all buildings constructed over 50 years ago and that possess architectural or historical significance may be considered potential historic resources. Proposed changes to these buildings may require some level of environmental review. Most resources must meet the 50-year threshold for historic significance; however, resources less than 50 years in age may be eligible for listing on the CRHR if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand their historical importance. Local The Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Element of the City of Orange General Plan provides the following goals pertaining to cultural resources. (City of Orange, 2010): Goal 1.0: Identify and preserve potential and listed historic resources, including buildings, structures, objects, sites, districts, and archaeological resources citywide. Goal 2.0: Identify and preserve neighborhoods that are culturally and historically significant but do not retain sufficient integrity for eligibility as a local, state, or national district. Goal 3.0: Provide incentives and expand education efforts for historic preservation. Goal 4.0: Identify and preserve archaeological and cultural resources. Cultural Resources Records Search A search of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located at the University of California, Fullerton was completed on April 25, 2018. The search was performed to identify all previously recorded cultural resources, as well as previously conducted cultural resource studies within the project site and a half-mile buffer surrounding it. The CHRIS search included a review of the NRHP, the CRHR, the Office of Historic Preservation Historic Properties Directory, the California Inventory of Historic Resources, and the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility list. The SCCIC records search identified one previously recorded cultural resource within a half-mile buffer of the project site. This resource, 30-158710, is a historic building known as the Porter-French House (HRI Property #038076), which is a domestic single-story house of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. This resource is located outside of the project site and is listed on the NRHP. The record search identified no cultural resources within or adjacent to the project site (see Attachment B). Five prior cultural resources studies have been completed within a half-mile of the project site. Three of these studies have been performed within or adjacent to the project site. One of these studies, OR-03373, includes the current project site. OR-03373 consisted of archaeological monitoring for the Qwest Network Construction Project; no cultural resources were identified within the project site by this study. OR-03094 and OR-02717 are both located adjacent to the project site. OR-03094 consisted of a cultural resource assessment for Cingular Wireless Facility Number SC 050-03 in the City of Santa Ana, and OR- 02717 is a cultural resource assessment of Cingular Wireless Facility Number SC 050-02 in Orange County. No cultural resources were identified in either study. Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 4 Native American Outreach and Consultation On April 30, 2018, Rincon contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and requested a search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) and a list of Native American individuals or tribal organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources within or near the project site. Rincon received a response on May 1, 2018 from the NAHC with negative results for the SLF search. The NAHC also sent a list of 22 Native American individuals or tribal organizations. Rincon sent letters on May 5, 2018 to the Native American contacts. As of June 11, 2018, Rincon has received one response from these outreach efforts. In a letter dated May 10, 2018, the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians stated that the project site has little cultural significance or ties to the tribe. The Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians recommended that Rincon contact the tribes closest to the project site. The letter also requested that the tribe be informed if there are any new developments, such as new discoveries of resources or human remains. Rincon also assisted the City with AB 52 and SB 18 consultation as required by CEQA by providing instructions, legislation information, draft letters and maps, and a correspondence tracking sheet to be used for formal consultation. As of June 15, 2018, the City is preparing to send the AB 52 and SB 18 notification letters to California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the area. Historical Map, Aerial, and Plan Review According to historic maps, development of the surrounding area had begun by 1896 with the construction of Southern Pacific Railroad and the Orange Station, the later of which is located south of the project site. By 1901, a road that would later become Main Street was developed running north- south adjacent to the project site. By 1932, the area had become more developed with the construction of the West Orange School and St. Joseph Hospital just to the east of the project site and Highway 101 appearing to the south by 1942 (USGS N.d). According to historical aerial photographs, the project site appears and was under cultivation by 1946, with a citrus grove covering the entire parcel (NETR 2018). Between 1952 and 1959, the citrus grove was removed, and the current project footprint was developed. In 1959, a building on the northeast corner of the lot and W. Almond Avenue were constructed. Building plans dating to 1959 show the original design of the building with more characteristic features of the Chalet subtype of the Ranch style of architecture including exposed rafters, diamond-pane windows, and a wood beam supported breezeway fronting the east elevation (J&M Drafting Services 1959). The permit for the construction of the restaurant building at the site was requested on July 13, 1959. The 1963 aerial shows the original footprint of the building. The sign fronting the building was added in 1964 according to building permits. Plans drafted in October 15, 1982 show a new addition to the building at the eastern bay of the north elevation and parts of the east elevation and eastern bay of the south elevation (Perez and Hurtado 1982). By 1995, the north elevation of the building had been extended to the sidewalk in its current configuration (NETR 2018; City of Orange building permits 1959-1964). Development in the surrounding area continued through the 20th century. In 1959, major freeways such the 57 and 55 appeared, which connected Orange to other cities in southern California. Additional Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 5 schools, including Portola Middle School and Sycamore School, were constructed nearby to the north by 1964 (USGS N.d). Field Survey Rincon Cultural Resources Specialist Tricia Dodds, M.A., RPA, conducted a survey of the project site and surrounding area on June 1, 2018. The field survey of the property consisted of a visual inspection of all built environment features at the project site, including buildings, structures, and associated features to assess their overall condition and integrity, and to identify and document any potential character- defining features. Ms. Dodds documented the survey using field notes and digital photographs (Figures 3-4). Because the project site is occupied entirely by structures, pavement, and landscaping, an archaeological survey was not completed. Ms. Dodds also visited the City of Orange Building and Safety Department to review building permits to capture the property’s construction, ownership, and occupant history. Copies of the field notes and digital photographs from the survey are on file with Rincon’s Los Angeles office. Rincon Senior Architectural Historian Aisha Rahimi-Fike, M.A., reviewed the fieldwork materials and completed a Department of Parks and Recreation 523 series form of the building located within the project site (Attachment C). Figure 3. Street view of project site, view west. Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 6 Site overview, view northwest. Historic Evaluation The subject property at 202 S. Main Street in Orange is ineligible for listing in the NRHP and the CRHR. The property owners, Marta Investment Corp., constructed a restaurant (Iron Horse Restaurant) on the subject property in 1959, using the designs for the building drafted by Currie Engineering Company, a little known local engineering company. Historic newspaper research did not provide information for the engineering firm or the builder. The building was designed in the Chalet subtype of the Ranch style, a style commonly used for restaurant buildings and buildings in shopping centers constructed during the post-war era. Iron Horse Restaurant remained at the property until 1979, at which time it was purchased by Paul Rossi and changed to La Brasserie, a French restaurant. Additions were made to the street level façade at S. Main Street and W. Almond Ave in 1983, significantly diminishing the integrity of the building. An evaluation of the property found no evidence to suggest it is associated with any important events or trends in history as it was one of many to have been developed in the postwar era (Criterion A/1), any individuals important in history (Criterion B/2), significant for its architecture or associated with a noted/master architect/builder (Criterion C/3), or has the potential to yield information important in history/pre-history (Criterion D/4). Furthermore, the property lacks integrity to its historic period. As such, it is not eligible for NRHP/CRHR listing. Further, the 1983 additions themselves do not rise to the level of exceptional significance necessary for listing properties or additions below the age of 50 years under NRHP Criterion Consideration G. For a detailed description of the property, historic context and evaluation, see the DPR form in Attachment C. Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 7 Findings and Recommendations Based on the results of the cultural resources records search, Native American scoping, review of historical maps and aerials, and field survey, no known archaeological resources were identified within the project site. One historic architectural resource, a building constructed in 1959, was documented on the project site. An evaluation of this resource indicates that it is ineligible for listing in the NRHP or the CRHR and lacks historic integrity. Based on the findings of the current study, Rincon recommends a finding of no impact with regard to historical and archaeological resources for the purposes of CEQA. Rincon presents the following measure for best management practices for the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources during ground disturbing activity. Unanticipated Discovery of Archaeological Resources If archaeological resources are encountered during ground-disturbing activities, work in the immediate area should be halted, and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (National Park Service 1983) should be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. If necessary, the evaluation may require preparation of a treatment plan and archaeological testing for CRHR eligibility. If the discovery proves to be significant under CEQA and cannot be avoided by the project, additional work, such as data recovery excavation, may be warranted to mitigate any significant impacts to historical resources. Rincon is providing the following language paraphrasing the legal requirements in the case of unanticipated discoveries of human remains during ground-disturbing activities. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains The discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground-disturbing activities. If human remains are found, the State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In the event of an unanticipated discovery of human remains, the County Coroner must be notified immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine and notify a most likely descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site and provide recommendations for treatment to the landowner within 48 hours of being granted access. Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 8 Please do not hesitate to contact Rincon with any questions regarding this cultural resource study. Sincerely, Rincon Consultants, Inc. Tricia Dodds, M.A., RPA Tiffany Clark, Ph.D., RPA Archaeologist Senior Archaeologist Principal Investigator Joe Power, AICP CEP Aisha Fike Vice President/ Principal Senior Architectural Historian Attachments Attachment A. Figure 1. Regional Project Location Map Figure 2. Project Location Map Attachment B. Records Search Summary Attachment C. Department of Parks and Recreation Primary Record References City of Orange Department of Community Development 2010 City of Orange 2010 General Plan: Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation. Adopted by the Orange City Council on March 9, 2010. Electronic accessed on June 6, 2018 at https://www.cityoforange.org/391/General-Plan. City of Orange Department of Community Development, Building Division 1959-1983 Building Permits J&M Drafting Service, and Currie Engineering Company 1959 Plans for a Shopping Center for M&F Development Inc. Listed with Currie Engineering Company. Available at the City of Orange Department of Community Development, Building Division, 300 E. Chapman Ave, Orange, Ca Michael Baker International Chick-fil-A Orange Project Page 9 National Park Service 1983 Archaeological and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Electronic document, online at http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law- Arch_Standards.htm, accessed December 6, 2011. Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC (NETR) 2018 Historicaerials.com: 202 S. Main Street, Orange, 1946, 1952, 1963, 1980, 1995. Accessed on June 4, 2018. Perez and Hurtado, Architects Inc. 1982 Building Addition for La Brasserie French Restaurant, 202 S. Main Street, Orange, Calif. Plans available at the City of Orange Department of Community Development, Building Division, 300 E. Chapman Ave, Orange, Ca. United States Geological Survey (USGS) N.d Topoview Historic Maps 1896-1964 of 202 S. Main Street, Orange, California. Electronic document, online at https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#4/39.98/-100.06, accessed June 11, 2018. Attachment A Figure 1. Regional Project Location Map Figure 2. Project Location Map Figure 1. Regional Project Location Figure 2. Project Location Attachment B Records Search Summary Resource List Report List Attachment C Department of Parks and Recreation Primary Record APPENDIX 8.3 Geotechnical Investigation RED Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 N. Main Street Orange, California Prepared for: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Irvine, California Prepared by: Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. December 14, 2016 Project No. 2G-1610007 December 14, 2016 Chick-fil-A, Inc. 15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 350 Irvine, California 92618 Attention: Ms. Beth Witt Development Coordinator Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis - Draft Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 N. Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Dear Ms. Witt: Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (Giles) is pleased to present our Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis report prepared for the above-referenced project. Conclusions and recommendations developed from the exploration and analysis are discussed in the accompanying report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If we may be of additional assistance, should geotechnical related problems occur or to provide construction observation and testing services, please do not hesitate to call at any time. Respectfully submitted, GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Edgar L. Gatus, P.E. Robert R. Russell, P.E., G.E. Assistant Branch Manager Regional Director Distribution: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Attn: Ms. Beth Witt (email: Beth.Witt@cfacorp.com) Attn: Ms. Jennifer Daw (email: Jennifer.Daw@cfacorp.com) Attn: Ms. Sharon Phelps (email: Sharon.Phelps@cfacorp.com) Attn: Ms. Leslie Clay (email: Leslie.Clay@cfacorp.com) (1 upload to Buzzsaw) _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS - DRAFT PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT #4003 MAIN & ALMOND FSU 202 N. MAIN STREET ORANGE, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 2G-1610007 Description Page No. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OUTLINE ................................................................................ 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................................................. 3 3.0 SITES AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................... 3 3.1 Site Description ................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Proposed Project Description .............................................................................. 4 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION .................................................................................... 4 4.1 Subsurface Exploration ....................................................................................... 4 4.2 Subsurface Conditions ........................................................................................ 5 4.3 Infiltration Testing................................................................................................ 6 4.4 Photoionization Detector (PID) Screening ........................................................... 7 5.0 LABORATORY TESTING ............................................................................................... 7 6.0 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS .......................................................................... 9 6.1 Active Fault Zones .............................................................................................. 9 6.2 Seismic Hazard Zones ........................................................................................ 9 6.3 Landslide Hazards ............................................................................................ 10 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..............................................................10 7.1 Seismic Design Considerations .......................................................................... 10 7.2 Site Development Recommendations ................................................................ 11 7.3 Construction Considerations .............................................................................. 14 7.4 Foundation Recommendations .......................................................................... 15 7.5 Floor Slab Recommendations ............................................................................ 16 7.6 New Pavement .................................................................................................. 17 7.7 Recommended Construction Materials Testing Services ................................... 19 7.8 Basis of Report .................................................................................................. 19 APPENDICES Appendix A – Figures (4) and Boring Logs (8) Appendix B – Field Procedures Appendix C – Laboratory Testing and Classification Appendix D – General Information (Modified Guideline Specifications) and Important Information About Your Geotechnical Report _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS-DRAFT CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT #4003 MAIN & ALMOND FSU 202 N. MAIN STREET ORANGE, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 2G-1610007 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OUTLINE The executive summary is provided solely for purposes of overview. Any party who relies on this report must read the full report. The executive summary omits a number of details, any one of which could be crucial to the proper application of this report. Subsurface Conditions • Site Class designation D is recommended for seismic design considerations. • Based on our review of the Geologic Map for the Orange County California prepared by California Department of Conservation, the site is mapped as being underlain by Young Alluvial Fan Deposits that typically consist of unconsolidated, loose to moderately dense sand, sandy silt and silt. • Fill materials were encountered within test borings B-1 to B-5 to depths of about 1½ to 2 feet below existing grades. These materials were noted to be generally moist, very loose silty sand with trace to little clay. • Native soils encountered below the fill materials and beneath the pavement within test borings B-6 to B-8 were generally damp to very moist, very loose to medium dense in relative density silty sand and clayey sand, and soft in comparative consistency sandy clay. Site Development • The proposed site development will include the demolition of existing building (with basement) for the construction of a new Chick-fil-A single-story building and site improvements that will include new concrete walkways, parking stalls, driveways, drive thru lane, and trash enclosure. • New Building: Due to the presence of variable and low strength soils and the likely disturbance during demolition, we recommend that the subgrade soils within the proposed building area (non- basement area) be over-excavated and backfilled as outlined within the report text. The soils exposed at the bottom of the soil over-excavation and beneath the existing basement should be examined by the geotechnical engineer to assess the suitability of these soils for building support. If unsuitable soils are observed, over-excavation may be needed, as recommended by the geotechnical engineer. The building pad area may then be backfilled with a properly placed and compacted engineered fill. • The existing building possesses a basement. The basement walls and floor slab should be removed. However, alternatively, the basement floor slab could be left in-place provided the slab is punctured on about 6 foot centers and the initial one foot of fill consist of a free-draining aggregate. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 2 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Building Foundation • Shallow spread footing foundation systems or turned-down slabs may be designed for a maximum, net allowable soil pressure of 2,500 psf soil bearing pressure underlain by competent subgrade soils. • We recommend that all strip footings be reinforced with at least 4 No. 5 bars (2 top and 2 bottom). Building Floor Slab • It is recommended that on grade slab be a minimum 4-inch thick slab-on-grade or turned-down slab over properly prepared subgrade. • A minimum 10-mil vapor retarder is recommended to be directly below the floor slab or base course where required to protect moisture sensitive floor coverings. • Minimum slab reinforcing recommended consisting of No. 3 rebars spaced at 18 inches on center, each way. Parking Improvement • Asphalt Pavements: 3 inches of asphaltic concrete underlain by 4 and 6 inches of base course aggregate in parking stalls and driveways, respectively. • Portland Cement Concrete: 6 inches in thickness underlain by 4 inches of base course in high stress areas such as entrance/exit aprons, trash enclosure-loading zone, and the drive through area. RED - This site has been given a red designation due to potential increased costs associated with the removal of the basement and placement of engineered fill. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 3 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES This report provides the results of the Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis that Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (“Giles”) conducted regarding the proposed development. The Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis included several separate, but related, service areas referenced hereafter as the Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Program, Geotechnical Laboratory Services, and Geotechnical Engineering Services. The scope of each service area was narrow and limited, as directed by our client and in consideration of the proposed project. The scope of each service area is briefly explained in this report. Geotechnical-related recommendations for design and construction of the foundation and ground- bearing floor slab for the proposed building are provided in this report. Geotechnical-related recommendations are also provided for the proposed parking lot improvements. Site preparation recommendations are also given; however, those recommendations are only preliminary since the means and methods of site preparation will depend on factors that were unknown when this report was prepared. Those factors include the weather before and during construction, the water table at the time of construction, subsurface conditions that are exposed during construction, and finalized details of the proposed development. Giles conducted a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for the subject site. The results of that assessment were provided under separate cover. 3.0 SITES AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Site Description A new Chick-fil-A restaurant with drive-thru lane is proposed at 202 N. Main Street in the city of Orange, California. The site is currently occupied by a vacant one to two story Manhattan Steak and Seafood restaurant building with basement. It is unknown if the existing basement extends beneath the entire building. The building is located in the northeast corner of the property with paved parking stalls and driveways to the west and south of the building. The site is bordered on the north by Almond Avenue, on the east by Main Street, on the south by a two story office/medical building and on the east by a single story preschool building. Access to the site is through driveways at Almond Avenue and Main Street. Other existing site improvements include asphalt pavements, concrete curbs and gutters, concrete walkways, block walls along the southerly and westerly property lines, some planter areas that contain trees and shrubs and underground utilities. The existing site parking lot and parking areas are considered to be in fair condition. Our review of the ALTA/ACSM survey prepared by Truxaw and Associates Inc. (Truxaw) indicated elevations within the site ranged from Elevation (EL.) 159.8 feet along the northeast corner of the site to El. 156.7 along the southwest corner of the site. Additionally, according to Truxaw site survey, the Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 4 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. existing multi story vacant building has basement. However, whether this is a full or partial basement is not known as of the date of this report. The subject property is situated at approximately latitude 33.7859o North and longitude -117.8677o West. 3.2 Proposed Project Description Based on our review of the Preliminary Site Plan (PSP-7) prepared by CRHO Architecture (Project Architect), the existing building (Manhattan Steak and Seafood restaurant) will be demolished to accommodate the construction of a new 4,998 square feet Chick-fil-A building. The new building will be constructed in the northeast corner of the property and within a portion of the existing building (Figure 1). Although detailed building plans are not yet ready for our review, it is our understanding that the proposed building will be a single-story wood-frame structure with no basement or underground level. We were not provided with specific loading information for this project at the time of this report; however, based on previous Chick-fil-A projects, we expect the maximum combined dead and live loads supported by the bearing walls and columns will be 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot (klf) and 40 to 50 kips, respectively. The live load supported by the floor slab is expected to be a maximum of 100 pounds per square foot (psf). Other planned improvements include a drive-thru lane to the north, east and south of the new building, new parking stalls, menu board signs, a new trash enclosure, an outdoor patio, new concrete walkways, and new planter areas. Preliminary project information did not indicate the planned finished floor elevation for the proposed building. However, it is anticipated that the finished floor of the new building will roughly match the existing building finished floor elevation. Based on the topographic information provided in the ALTA Survey, we estimate a finished floor elevation of about El. 159.5. Based upon the existing site elevations, site grading is anticipated to be minimal with the exception of backfilling of the existing basement. The traffic loading on the proposed parking lot is understood to predominantly consist of automobiles with occasional heavy trucks resulting from deliveries and trash removal. The parking lot pavement sections have been designed on the basis of an assumed Traffic Index of 4.0 for the parking stall areas (light duty) and 5.0 for the drive lanes (medium duty). Pavement designs are based on a 20- year design period. 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 4.1 Subsurface Exploration Our subsurface exploration consisted of the drilling of eight (8) exploratory test borings to depths of about 5 to 16½ feet below existing ground surfaces. Some of the boring locations were restricted due to the existing building. The approximate test boring locations are shown in the Test Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). The Test Boring Location Plan and Test Boring Logs (Records of Subsurface Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 5 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Exploration) are enclosed in Appendix A. Field and laboratory test procedures and results are enclosed in Appendix B and C, respectively. The terms and symbols used on the Test Boring Logs are defined on the General Notes in Appendix D. Our subsurface exploration included the collection of relatively undisturbed samples of subsurface soil materials for laboratory testing purposes. Bulk samples consisted of composite soil materials obtained at selected depth intervals from the borings. Relatively undisturbed samples were collected (per ASTM D-3550) using a 3-inch outside-diameter, modified California split-spoon soil sampler (CS) lined with 1-inch high brass rings. The sampler was driven with successive 30-inch drops of a hydraulically operated, 140-pound automatic trip hammer. Blow counts for each 6-inch driving increment were recorded on the field exploration logs. The central portions of the driven core samples were placed in sealed containers and transported to our laboratory for testing. Where deemed appropriate, standard split-spoon tests (SS), also called Standard Penetration Test (SPT), were also performed at selected depth intervals in accordance with the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Standard Procedure D 1586. This method consists of mechanically driving an unlined standard split-barrel sampler 18 inches into the soil with successive 30-inch drops of the 140-pound automatic trip hammer. Blow counts for each 6-inch driving increment were recorded on the exploration logs. The number of blows required to drive the standard split-spoon sampler for the last 12 of the 18 inches was identified as the uncorrected standard penetration resistance (N). Disturbed soil samples from the unlined standard split-spoon samplers were placed in plastic containers and transported to our laboratory for testing. 4.2 Subsurface Conditions The subsurface conditions as subsequently described have been simplified somewhat for ease of report interpretation. A more detailed description of the subsurface conditions at the test boring locations is provided by the logs of the test borings enclosed in Appendix A of this report. Site Geologic Setting Based on our review of the Geologic Map for the Orange County California prepared by California Department of Conservation, the site is mapped as being underlain by Young Alluvial Fan Deposits that typically consist of unconsolidated, loose to moderately dense sand, sandy silt and silt. Pavement Existing pavement encountered consisted of approximately 2½ to 6 inches thick asphaltic concrete with no base noted, except at Test Boring B-5 where about 4 inches of aggregate base was encountered. Based on our visual observation, the existing pavement is in fair condition. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 6 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Soil Fill materials were encountered within our exploratory Test Borings B-1 to B-5 to depths of about 1½ to 2 feet below existing grades. These materials were noted to be generally moist, very loose silty sand with trace to little clay. Additional fill soils may be situated adjacent to the existing basement foundation walls associated with the existing building. Native soils encountered below the fill materials and beneath the pavement within Test Borings B-6 to B-8 were generally damp to very moist, very loose to medium dense in relative density silty sand and clayey sand, and soft in comparative consistency sandy clay. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during our subsurface investigation to the maximum depth explored (16.5 feet). Based on a review of the Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Orange Quadrangle, the depth to historic high groundwater is reported to be greater than 40 feet below grade. However, fluctuations of the groundwater table, localized zones of perched water, and rise in soil moisture content should be anticipated during and after the rainy season. Irrigation of landscape areas on or adjacent to the site can also cause fluctuations of local or shallow perched groundwater levels. 4.3 Infiltration Testing It is our understanding that an on-site below grade storm water infiltration system is being considered for the site. Two percolation tests (B-6 @ 5 feet and B-7 @ 6 feet) were conducted at the site (Figure 1) and involved the drilling of a test boring utilizing a hollow-stem auger drill rig with an outside diameter of approximately 8 inches. Within the drilled test hole gravel about 2 inches in thickness was placed at the bottom of the test hole, then a two-inch diameter perforated pvc pipe was installed inside the boring and pea gravel was used as filter pack around the outside diameter of the pipe. Testing involved presoaking the test holes and filling the test holes with water, and recording the drop in the water surface. The approximate locations of the percolation tests are shown on the attached Figure 1. The infiltration test procedure outlined in the Orange County Technical Guidance Document (OCTGD) was used as a guide in our percolation testing. A summary of the results of the percolation tests is provided in Table 1 below. The drop in water level over time is the pre-adjusted percolation rate at the test location. The pre- adjusted percolation rates were reduced to account for the discharge of water from both the sides and bottom of the boring. The formula below was used to calculate for the infiltration rate. Infiltration Rate = ∆H (60r) / ∆t (r + 2Havg) Where: r is the radius of the test hole (in) Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 7 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. ∆H is the change in height over the time interval (in) ∆t is the time interval (min) Havg is the average head height over the time interval Additionally, the calculated infiltration rates were also adjusted to reflect a factor saf ety (FS) of 2 applied to the rates obtained from the infiltration test results and are summarized below. TABLE 1 – PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS Test Hole Test Depth1 (feet) Pre-Adjusted Percolation Rate (in/hr) Infiltration Rate 2 (in/hr) Soil Type B-6 5.0± 12.24 1.00 Silty Sand B-7 6.0± 24.48 1.12 Silty Sand 1) Depth is referenced to the existing surface grade at the test location. 2) Reflects FS of 2 per Worksheet H of OCTGD It should be noted that the infiltration rate of the on-site soils represents a specific area and depth tested and may fluctuate throughout other areas of the site. 4.4 Photoionization Detector (PID) Screening Soil samples taken from our subsurface exploration were screened with a Photoionization Detector (PID) to check for the possible presence of volatile vapors. Volatile vapors were detected within test borings B-1 at 3.5 feet and B-4 at 10 feet and measured about 42.1 and 18.2 ppm, respectively, with the use of a PID instrument. PID field-screening results are included on the soil boring logs and also provided to our environmental department. 5.0 LABORATORY TESTING Several laboratory tests were performed on selected samples considered representative of those encountered in order to evaluate the engineering properties of on-site soils. The following are brief description of our laboratory test results. In Situ Moisture and Density Tests were performed on select samples from the test borings to determine the subsoils dry density and natural moisture contents in accordance with Test Method ASTM 2216-05. The results of these tests are included in the Test Boring Logs enclosed in Appendix A. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 8 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Sieve Analysis Sieve Analyses including Passing No. 200 Sieve were performed on selected samples from Test Borings B-2, B-4, B-6 and B-7 to assist in soil classification. These tests were performed in accordance with Test Method ASTM D 1140-00 (Reapproved 2006) and ASTC C 1369-96. The results of the sieve analyses are graphically presented as Figure 2 and passing no. 200 sieve res ults are presented on Test Boring Logs, Appendix A. Expansion To evaluate the expansive potential of the near surface soils encountered during our subsurface exploration, a composite sample collected from Test Boring B-2 (1 to 5 feet) was subjected to Expansive Index (EI) testing in accordance with Test Method ASTM D 4829-08a. The result of our expansion index (EI) test indicates that the near surface sample has a very low expansion potential (EI= 0). Consolidation Test The consolidation characteristics of the site soils under anticipated loads were made on the basis of one-dimensional consolidation tests. These tests were performed in general accordance with Test Method ASTM D 2435-11. The test samples were inundated at 2,000 psf pressure in order to evaluate the sudden increase in moisture condition (swell or collapse potential). Results of this tests indicated that the near surface soils exhibited a low collapse potential of 0.04% and 0.63% at a loading of 2000 psf. The Consolidation test curves, Figures 3 and 4, are included in Appendix A. .Soluble Sulfate Analysis and Soil Corrosivity A representative sample of the near surface soils which may contact shallow buried utilities and structural concrete was performed to determine the corrosion potential for buried ferrous metal conduits and the concentrations present of water soluble sulfate which could result in chemical attack of cement. The following table presents the results of our laboratory testing. Parameter B-2 1 to 5 feet pH 7.88 Chloride 96 ppm Sulfate 0.0156% Resistivity 4,000 ohm-cm The chloride content of the near-surface soils was determined for a selected sample in accordance with California Test Method No. 422. The results of this test indicated that tested on-site soil has a Low exposure to chloride. The results of limited in-house testing of soil pH and resistivity were determined in accordance with California test Method No. 643 and indicated that on-site soil is slightly alkaline with respect to pH. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 9 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. These test results have been evaluated in accordance with criteria established by the Cast Iron Pipe Research Association, Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association, the American Concrete Institute and the National Association of Corrosion Engineers. The test results on a near surface bulk sample from the site generally indicate that tested site soils has a moderate corrosive potential when in contact with ferrous materials. Therefore, special protection for underground cast iron pipe or ductile pipe may be warranted depending on the actual materials in contact with the pipe. We recommend that a corrosion engineer review these results in order to provide specific recommendations for corrosion protection as well as appropriate recommendations for other types of buried metal structures. Corrosivity testing also included determination of the concentrations of water-soluble sulfates present in the tested soil sample in accordance with California Test Method No. 417. Our laboratory test data indicated that near surface soils contain approximately 0.0156 percent of water soluble sulfates. Based on the 2013 California Building Code (CBC), concrete that may be exposed to sulfate containing soils shall comply with the provisions of ACI 318-05, Section 4.3. Therefore, according to Table 4.3.1 of the ACI 318-05, a low exposure to sulfate corrosivity can be expected for concrete placed in contact with the tested on-site soils. No special sulfate resistant cement is considered necessary for concrete which will be in contact with the tested on-site soils. 6.0 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARD 6.1 Active Fault Zones The project site is located in the highly seismic Southern California region within the influence of several fault systems. However, the site is not mapped within the boundaries of an Earthquake Fault Zone as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. 6.2 Seismic Hazard Zones Our review of the published Seismic Hazard Evaluation Report for the Orange Quadrangle (within which the subject site is located) indicates that the subject site does not lie within a designated Liquefaction Hazard Zone. Therefore, an assessment of the potential for liquefaction is not considered necessary. General types of ground failures that might occur as a consequence of severe ground shaking typically include landsliding, ground lurching and shallow ground rupture. The probability of occurrence of each type of ground failure depends on the severity of the earthquake, distance from faults, topography, subsoils and groundwater conditions, in addition to other factors. Based on our subsurface exploration and the seismic designation for this site, all of the above effects of seismic activity are considered unlikely at the site. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 10 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.3 Landslide Hazards The subject site does not lie within the designated Landslide Hazard Zone based on our review of the published Seismic Hazard Evaluation Report for the Orange Quadrangle. Since the subject site is generally level and not located near unstable slope, mitigation of landslide hazards is not necessary for the site. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our subsurface exploration and laboratory testing, the planned development for the subject site is considered feasible from a geotechnical point of view provided the following conclusions and recommendations are incorporated in the design and project specifications. Conditions imposed by the proposed improvement have been evaluated on the basis of the engineering characteristics of the subsurface materials encountered during our subsurface investigation and their anticipated behavior both during and after construction. Conclusions and recommendations, along with site preparation recommendations and construction considerations are discussed in the following sections of this report. We recommend that Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. be involved in the review of the grading and foundation plans for the site to ensure our recommendations are interpreted correctly. Based on the results of our review, modifications to our recommendations or the plans may be warranted. 7.1 Seismic Design Considerations Faulting/Seismic Design Parameters Research of available maps published by the California Geological Survey (CGS) indicates that the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The potential for fault rupture through the site is, therefore, considered to be low. The site may however be subject to strong groundshaking during seismic activity. The proposed structure should be designed in accordance with the current version of the 2013 California Building Code (CBC) and applicable local codes. Based on our subsurface exploration, a Site Class D is recommended for design. According to the 2008 National Seismic Hazard Maps prepared by USGS, the San Joaquin Hills, Puente Hills (Coyote Hills), Elsinore:W+GI+T+J+CM, and Newport Inglewood Connected alt 2 faults are the closest known active faults and are located about 6.51, 6.67, 9.41 and 10.46 miles, respectively, from the site and with an anticipated maximum moment magnitude (Mw) of 7.10, 6.90, 7.85 and 7.50, respectively. The proposed structure should be designed in accordance with the current version of the 2013 California Building Code (CBC) and applicable local codes. Within the International Code Council’s 2012 International Building Code (IBC), the five-percent damped design spectral response Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 11 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. accelerations at short periods, SDS, and at 1-second period, SD1, are used to determine the seismic design base shear. These parameters, which are a function of the site’s seismicity and soil, are also used as parts of triggers for other code requirements. The following values are determined by using the USGS published U.S. Seismic Design Maps program based upon the 2013 CBC referenced ASCE 7 (with July 2013 errata). IBC 2012/ CBC 2013, Earthquake Loads Site Class Definition (Table 1613.5.2) D Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, Ss (Figure 1613.3.1(1) for 0.2 second) 1.488 Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, S1 (Figure 1613.3.1(2) for 1.0 second) 0.543 Site Coefficient, Fa (Table 1613.3.3 (1) short period) 1.000 Site Coefficient, Fv (Table 1613.3.3 (2) 1-second period) 1.500 Adjusted Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SMS (Eq. 16-37) 1.488 Adjusted Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SM1 (Eq. 16-38) 0.814 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SDS (Eq. 16-39) 0.992 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SD1 (Eq. 16-40) 0.543 7.2 Site Development Recommendations The following recommendations for site development have been based upon the assumed floor elevation and foundation bearing grades and the conditions encountered at the test boring locations. Site Clearing & Demolition Clearing operations should include the demolition and removal of all existing landscape areas and structural features such as building footings and floor slab, basement walls or other below-grade construction, asphaltic concrete pavement, and concrete walkways within the area of the proposed new building and site improvements. The basement floor slab may be removed or can be left in-place provided the concrete slab is punctured at intervals of about 6 feet on center and the initial one foot of backfill consists of a free-draining aggregate. This procedure is recommended to allow drainage through the slab should it be desired to leave in-place. The basement should be backfilled with a properly placed and compacted fill as recommended in a subsequent section of this report. If desired, basement walls may be left in-place outside of the new building location. All basement walls to be left in-place should be cut-off at least 3 feet below finished grade and any hollow CMU cores should be filled with grout. The locations of any walls to be left in-place should be evaluated to verify that the existing walls will not interfere with future utility line excavation. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 12 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. All soils disturbed by the demolition and clearing operations should be removed and stockpiled for future use. All debris resulting from the demolition and clearing operations should be legally disposed off-site. Clearing operations should also include the removal of all vegetation within the area of proposed development. Trees and large shrubs to be removed should include their stumps and major roots. Existing pavement within areas of proposed development should be removed or processed to a maximum 3-inch size and stockpiled for use as compacted fill or stabilizing material for the new development. Processed asphalt may be used as fill, sub-base course material, or subgrade stabilization material beyond the building perimeter. Processed concrete or existing base may be used as fill, sub-base course material, or subgrade stabilization material both within and outside of the building perimeter. Due to the moisture sensitivity and variable support characteristics of the on-site soils, the pavement is recommended to remain in-place as long as possible to help protect the subgrade from construction traffic. Should any unusual soil conditions or subsurface structures be encountered during clearing/demolition operations or during grading, they should be brought to the immediate attention of the project geotechnical consultant for corrective recommendations. Existing Utilities All existing utilities should be located. Utilities that are not reused should be capped off and removed or properly abandoned in-place in accordance with local codes and ordinances. The excavations made for removed utilities that are in the influence zone of new construction are recommended to be backfilled with structural compacted fill. Underground utilities, which are to be reused or abandoned in-place, are recommended to be evaluated by the structural engineer and utility backfill is recommended to be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer, to determine their potential effect on the new improvement. If any existing utilities are to be preserved, grading operations must be carefully performed so as not to disturb or damage the existing utility. Building Area Due to the presence of variable and low strength soils and the likely disturbance of the subgrade soils during demolition operations, we recommend that the subgrade beneath the proposed building area (non-basement area) be over-excavated to a depth of at least 2 feet below the bottom of proposed footings and/or slabs and at least 3 feet below existing grade, whichever is deeper. The soil exposed at the bottom of the soil over-excavation and at the bottom of the existing basement (if exposed) should then be examined by the geotechnical engineer to assess the suitability of these soils for building support. The exposed soils should then be scarified, where possible, to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned and then compacted to at least 90% of the soil’s maximum dry density. The lateral extent of this recommendation should include the area at least 5 feet beyond the new building limits. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 13 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Positive drainage devices such as sloped concrete flatwork, earth swales, and sheet flow gradients in landscape, setback, and easement areas should be designed for the site. The drainage system should drain to a suitable discharge area. The purpose of this drainage system is to reduce water infiltration into the subgrade soils and to direct water away from buildings and site improvements. Proofroll and Compact After site clearing and lowering of site grades where necessary, the subgrades within the proposed pavement areas should be proofrolled in the presence of the geotechnical engineer with appropriate rubber-tire mounted heavy construction equipment or a loaded truck to detect very loose/soft yielding soil which should be removed to a stable subgrade. Following proofrolling and completion of any necessary over-excavation, the subgrade should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned and recompacted to at least 90 percent of the Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557- 00) maximum density. The upper 1 foot of the pavement subgrade should have minimum in-place density of at least 95% of the maximum dry density. Low areas and excavations may then be backfilled in lifts with suitable very low expansive (EI less than 21) structural compacted fill. The selection, placement and compaction of structural fill should be performed in accordance with the project specifications. The Guide Specifications included in Appendix D (Modified Proctor) of this report are recommended to be used, at a minimum, as an aid in developing the project specifications. The floor slab subgrade may need to be recompacted prior to slab construction due to weather and equipment traffic effects on the previously compacted soils. Reuse of On-site Soil On-site material may be reused as structural compacted fill within the proposed building and pavement improvement area provided they are moisture conditioned and compacted as recommended, and do not contain oversized materials, significant quantities of organic matter, or other deleterious materials. Care should be used in controlling the moisture content of the soils to achieve proper compaction for pavement support. All subgrade soil compaction as well as the selection, placement and compaction of new fill soils should be performed in accordance with the project specifications under engineering controlled conditions. Import Structural Fill Any soil imported to the site (if required) for use as structural fill should consist of very low expansive soils (EI less than 21). Material designated for import should be submitted to the project geotechnical engineer no less than three working days prior to placement for evaluation. In addition to expansion criteria, soils imported to the site should exhibit adequate shear strength characteristics for the recommended allowable soil bearing pressure; soluble sulfate content and corrosivity; and pavement support characteristics. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 14 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Subgrade Protection The near surface soils that are expected to comprise the subgrade are sensitive to water. Unstable soil conditions will develop if these soils are exposed to moisture increases or are disturbed (rutted) by construction traffic. The site should be graded to prevent water from ponding within construction areas and/or flowing into excavations. Accumulated water must be removed immediately along with any unstable soil. Foundation concrete should be placed and excavations backfilled as soon as possible to protect the bearing grade. The degree of subgrade instability and associated remedial construction is dependent, in part, upon precautions taken by the contractor to protect the subgrade during site development. Silt fences or other appropriate erosion control devices should be installed in accordance with local, state and federal requirements at the perimeter of the development areas to control sediment from erosion. Since silt fences or other erosion control measures are temporary structures, careful and continuous monitoring and periodic maintenance to remove accumulated soil and/or replacement should be anticipated. Fill Placement Material for engineered fill should be moisture conditioned and compacted in accordance with the specifications, be free of organic material, debris, and other deleterious substances, and should not contain fragments greater than 3 inches in maximum dimension. On-site excavated soils that meet these requirements may be used to backfill the excavated pavement areas. All fill should be placed in 8-inch-thick maximum loose lifts, moisture conditioned and then compacted in accordance with recommendation herein and with the enclosed “Guide Structural Fill Specifications”. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should be present on-site during grading operations to verify proper placement and compaction of all fill, as well as to verify compliance with the other geotechnical recommendations presented herein. 7.3 Construction Considerations Construction Dewatering Groundwater was not encountered during our subsurface investigation. Therefore, groundwater is not expected to impact shallow excavations for footings and utilities. However, the site may be susceptible to shallow perched water conditions. In the event that shallow perched water is encountered, filter sump pumps placed within pits in the bottoms of excavations are expected to be the most feasible method of construction dewatering. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 15 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Soil Excavation Some localized slope stability problems may be encountered in steep, unbraced excavations considering the granular nature of the subsoils. All excavations must be performed in accordance with CAL-OSHA requirements, which is the responsibility of the contractor. Shallow excavations may be adequately sloped for bank stability while deeper excavations or excavations where adequate back sloping cannot be performed may require some form of external support such as shoring or bracing. 7.4 Foundation Recommendations Vertical Load Capacity Upon completion of the building pad preparation, the proposed structure may be supported by a shallow foundation system underlain by newly placed engineered fill. The foundation system may consist of either independently constructed spread footings or monolithically constructed foundation and floor slab thereby using a turned-down slab construction technique. Foundations may be designed for a maximum, net, allowable soil-bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). Minimum foundation widths for walls and columns should be 16 and 24 inches, respectively, regardless of the calculated soil bearing pressure. The recommended allowable soil bearing pressure may be increased by one-third for short term wind and/or seismic loads. Reinforcing The recommended minimum quantity of longitudinal reinforcing for geotechnical considerations within continuous strip footing is four No. 5 bars (2 top and 2 bottom) continuous through column pads within the strip footings. The recommended quantity of longitudinal reinforcing pertains to a minimum 12- inch thick and a maximum 24-inch wide footing pad; additional reinforcing may be necessary if a thinner or wider footing pad is used to develop equivalent rigidity. Conventional reinforcing is considered suitable in isolated column pad footings. The final design of the foundations as well as determination of the actual quantity of steel reinforcing and the footing dimensions should be performed by the project structural engineer. Lateral Load Resistance Lateral load resistance will be developed by a combination of friction acting at the base of foundations and slabs and the passive earth pressure developed by footings below grade. Passive pressure and friction may be used in combination, without reduction, in determining the total resistance to lateral loads. A one-third increase in the passive pressure value may be used for short duration wind or seismic loads. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead load forces for footings placed on newly placed compacted fill soil. An allowable passive earth pressure of 250 psf per foot of footing depth (pcf) below the lowest adjacent grade may be used for the sides of footings placed against newly placed structural fill. The maximum recommended allowable passive pressure is 1,500 psf. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 16 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Bearing Material Criteria Soil suitable to serve as the foundation bearing grade should exhibit at least a loose relative density (average N value of at least 8) for non-cohesive soils for the recommended 2,500 psf allowable soil bearing pressure. For design and construction estimating purposes, suitable bearing soils are expected to be encountered at nominal foundation depths following the recommended site preparation activities. However, field testing by the Geotechnical Engineer within the foundation bearing soils is recommended to document that the foundation support soils possess the minimum strength parameters noted above. If unsuitable bearing soils are encountered, they should be recompacted in-place, if feasible, or excavated to a suitable bearing soil subgrade and to a lateral extent as defined by Item No. 3 of the enclosed Guide Specifications, with the excavation backfilled with structural compacted fill to develop a uniform bearing grade. As an alternate, a lean concrete slurry (minimum 28-day compressive strength of 500 psi) could be used as backfill and would limit the lateral over-excavation as needed with a soil backfill. If the lean concrete slurry option is used, it should extend at least 3 inches beyond to footing element. The effectiveness of the lean concrete option may also be limited due to anticipated caving within the granular soils. Foundation Embedment The California Building Code (CBC) requires a minimum 12-inch foundation embedment depth. However, it is recommended that exterior foundations extend at least 18 inches below the adjacent exterior grade for bearing capacity and to provide greater protection of the moisture sensitive bearing soils. Interior footings may be supported at nominal depth below the floor. All footings must be protected against weather and water damage during and after construction, and must be supported within suitable bearing materials. Estimated Foundation Settlement Post-construction total and differential static movement (settlement) of a shallow foundation system designed and constructed in accordance with the recommendations provided in this report are estimated to be less than ¾ and ½ inch, respectively, for static conditions. The estimated differential movement is anticipated to result in an angular distortion of about 0.002 inches per inch on the basis of a minimum clear span of 20 feet. The maximum estimated total and differential movement is considered within tolerable limits for the proposed structure provided it is considered in the structural design. 7.5 Floor Slab Recommendations Subgrade The floor slab subgrade should be prepared in accordance with the appropriate recommendations presented in the Site Development Recommendations section of this report. Foundation, utility trenches and other below-slab excavations should be backfilled with structural compacted fill in accordance with the project specifications. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 17 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Design The floor of the proposed building may be designed and constructed as a conventional slab-on-grade supported on a properly prepared subgrade. If desired, the floor slab may be poured monolithically with perimeter foundations where the foundations consist of thickened sections thereby using a turned-down slab construction technique. The minimum slab reinforcing for geotechnical considerations is recommended to consist of No. 3 rebars at 18 inches on center, each way. Based on the recommended reinforcing and the assumed live loading, the slab is recommended to be a minimum of 4 inches in thickness. A qualified structural engineer should perform the actual design of the slab to ensure proper thickness and reinforcing. A minimum 10-mil synthetic sheet should be placed below the floor slab to serve as a vapor retarder where required to protect moisture sensitive floor coverings (i.e. tile, or carpet, etc.). The sheets of the vapor retarder material should be evaluated for holes and/or punctures prior to placement and the edges overlapped and taped. If materials underlying the synthetic sheet contain sharp, angular particles, a layer of coarse sand (Sand Equivalent>30) approximately 2 inches thick or a geotextile should be provided to protect it from puncture. An additional 2-inch thick layer of coarse sand may be needed between the slab and the vapor retarder to promote proper curing. Proper curing techniques are recommended to reduce the potential for shrinkage cracking and slab curling. Estimated Movements Post-construction total and differential movements of the floor slab designed and constructed in accordance with the recommendations provided in this report are estimated to be less than ½ and ⅓ inch, respectively. Movements on the order of those estimated for foundations should be expected when the foundation and floor slab are structurally connected or constructed monolithically. The estimated differential movement is anticipated to occur across the short dimension of the structure. The maximum total and differential movement is considered within tolerable limits for the proposed structure, provided that the structural design adequately considers this distortion. 7.6 New Pavement The following recommendations for the new pavement are intended for vehicular traffic associated with the restaurant development within the subject property. New Pavement Subgrades Following completion of the recommended subgrade preparation procedures, the subgrade in areas of new pavement construction are expected to consist of existing soil that exhibit a very low expansion potential. The anticipated subgrade soils are classified as a fairs subgrade material with estimated R- value of 40 to 50 when properly prepared based on the Unified Soil Classification System designation of SM. An R-value of 40 has been assumed in the preparation of the pavement design. It should Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 18 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. however, be recognized that the City of Orange may require a specific R-value test to verify the use of the following design. It is recommended that this testing, if required, be conducted following completion of rough grading in the proposed pavement areas so that the R-value test results are indicative of the actual pavement subgrade soils. Alternatively, a minimum code pavement section may be required if a specific R-value test is not performed. To use this R-value, all fill added to the pavement subgrade must have pavement support characteristics at least equivalent to the existing soils, and must be placed and compacted in accordance with the project specifications. Asphalt Pavements The following table presents recommended thicknesses for a new flexible pavement structure consisting of asphaltic concrete over a granular base, along with the appropriate CALTRANS specifications for proper materials and placement procedures. An alternate pavement section has been provided for use in parking stall areas due to the anticipated lower traffic intensity in these areas. However, care must be used so that truck traffic is excluded from areas where the thinner pavement section is used, since premature pavement distress may occur. In the event that heavy vehicle traffic cannot be excluded from the specific areas, the pavement section recommended for drive lanes should be used throughout the parking lot. Pavement recommendations are based upon CALTRANS design parameters for a twenty-year design period and assume proper drainage and construction monitoring. It is, therefore, recommended that the geotechnical engineer monitors and tests subgrade preparation, and that the subgrade be evaluated immediately before pavement construction. Portland Concrete Pavements Portland Cement Concrete pavements are recommended in areas where traffic is concentrated such as the entrance/exit aprons as well as areas subjected to heavy loads such as the trash enclosure loading zone. The preparation of the subgrade soils within concrete pavement areas should be ASPHALT PAVEMENTS Materials Thickness (inches) CALTRANS Specifications Parking Stalls (TI=4.0) Drive Lanes (TI=5.0) Asphaltic Concrete Surface Course (b) 1 1 Section 39, (a) Asphaltic Concrete Binder Course (b) 2 2 Section 39, (a) Crushed Aggregate Base Course 4 6 Section 26, Class 2 (R-value at least 78) NOTES: (a) Compaction to density between 95 and 100 percent of the 50-Blow Marshall Density (b) The surface and binder course may be combined as a single layer placed in one lift if similar materials are utilized. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 19 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. performed as previously described in this report. Portland Cement Concrete pavements in high stress areas are recommended to be at least 6 inches thick containing No. 3 bars at 18-inch on-center both ways placed at mid-height. The pavement should be constructed in accordance with Section 40 of the CALTRANS Standard Specifications. A minimum 4-inch thick layer of base course (CALTRANS Class 2) is recommended below the concrete pavement. This base course should be compacted to at least 95% of the material’s maximum dry density. The maximum joint spacing within all of the Portland Cement Concrete pavements is recommended to be 15 feet to control shrinkage cracking. Load transfer reinforcing is recommended at construction joints perpendicular to traffic flow if construction joints are not properly keyed. In this event, ¾-inch diameter smooth dowel bars, 18 inches in length placed at 12 inches on-center are recommended where joints are perpendicular to the anticipated traffic flow. Expansion joints are recommended only where the pavement abuts fixed objects such as light standard foundations. Tie bars are recommended at the first joint within the perimeter of the concrete pavement area. Tie bars are recommended to be No. 4 bars at 42-inch on-center spacings and at least 48 inches in length. General Considerations Pavement recommendations assume proper drainage and construction monitoring and are based on traffic loads as indicated previously. Pavement designs are based on either PCA or CALTRANS design parameters for twenty (20) year design period. However, these designs are also based on a routine pavement maintenance program and significant asphalt concrete pavement rehabilitation after about 8 to 10 years, in order to obtain a reasonable pavement service life. 7.7 Recommended Construction Materials Testing Services The report was prepared assuming that Giles will perform Construction Materials Testing (CMT) services during construction of the proposed development. In general, CMT services are recommended (and expected) to at least include observation and testing of foundation and pavement support soil and other construction materials. It might be necessary for Giles to provide supplemental geotechnical recommendations based on the results of CMT services and specific details of the project not known at this time. 7.8 Basis of Report This report is based on Giles’ proposal, which is dated October 18, 2016 and is referenced by Giles’ proposal number 2GEP-1610016. The actual services for the project varied somewhat from those described in the proposal because of the conditions that were encountered while performing the services and in consideration of the proposed project. This report is strictly based on the project description given earlier in this report. Giles must be notified if any parts of the project description or our assumptions are not accurate so that this report can be amended, if needed. This report is based on the assumption that the facility will be designed and constructed according to the codes that govern construction at the site. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis-DRAFT Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #4003 Main & Almond FSU Orange, California Project No. 2G-1610007 Page 20 _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on estimated subsurface conditions as shown on the Records of Subsurface Exploration. Giles must be notified if the subsurface conditions that are encountered during construction of the proposed development differ from those shown on the Records of Subsurface Exploration because this report will likely need to be revised. General comments and limitations of this report are given in the appendix. © Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 2016 APPENDIX A FIGURES AND TEST BORING LOGS The Test Boring Location Plan contained herein was prepared based upon information supplied by Giles’ client, or others, along with Giles’ field measurements and observations. The diagram is presented for conceptual purposes only and is intended to assist the reader in report interpretation. The Test Boring Logs and related information enclosed herein depict the subsurface (soil and water) conditions encountered at the specific boring locations on the date that the exploration was performed. Subsurface conditions may differ between boring locations and within areas of the site that were not explored with test borings. The subsurface conditions may also change at the boring locations over the passage of time. APPENDIX B FIELD PROCEDURES The field operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) designation D 420 entitled “Standard Guide for Sampling Rock and Rock” and/or other relevant specifications. Soil samples were preserved and transported to Giles’ laboratory in general accordance with the procedures recommended by ASTM designation D 4220 entitled “Standard Practice for Preserving and Transporting Soil Samples.” Brief descriptions of the sampling, testing and field procedures commonly performed by Giles are provided herein. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL FIELD PROCEDURES Test Boring Elevations The ground surface elevations reported on the Test Boring Logs are referenced to the assumed benchmark shown on the Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). Unless otherwise noted, the elevations were determined with a conventional hand-level and are accurate to within about 1 foot. Test Boring Locations The test borings were located on-site based on the existing site features and/or apparent property lines. Dimensions illustrating the approximate boring locations are reported on the Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). Water Level Measurement The water levels reported on the Test Boring Logs represent the depth of “free” water encountered during drilling and/or after the drilling tools were removed from the borehole. Water levels measured within a granular (sand and gravel) soil profile are typically indicative of the water table elevation. It is usually not possible to accurately identify the water table elevation with cohesive (clayey) soils, since the rate of seepage is slow. The water table elevation within cohesive soils must therefore be determined over a period of time with groundwater observation wells. It must be recognized that the water table may fluctuate seasonally and during periods of heavy precipitation. Depending on the subsurface conditions, water may also become perched above the water table, especially during wet periods. Borehole Backfilling Procedures Each borehole was backfilled upon completion of the field operations. If potential contamination was encountered, and/or if required by state or local regulations, boreholes were backfilled with an “impervious” material (such as bentonite slurry). Borings that penetrated pavements, sidewalks, etc. were “capped” with Portland Cement concrete, asphaltic concrete, or a similar surface material. It must, however, be recognized that the backfill material may settle, and the surface cap may subside, over a period of time. Further backfilling and/or re-surfacing by Giles’ client or the property owner may be required. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD SAMPLING AND TESTING PROCEDURES Auger Sampling (AU) Soil samples are removed from the auger flights as an auger is withdrawn above the ground surface. Such samples are used to determine general soil types and identify approximate soil stratifications. Auger samples are highly disturbed and are therefore not typically used for geotechnical strength testing. Split-Barrel Sampling (SS) – (ASTM D-1586) A split-barrel sampler with a 2-inch outside diameter is driven into the subsoil with a 140- pound hammer free-falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The summation of hammer- blows required to drive the sampler the final 12-inches of an 18-inch sample interval is defined as the “Standard Penetration Resistance” or N-value is an index of the relative density of granular soils and the comparative consistency of cohesive soils. A soil sample is collected from each SPT interval. Shelby Tube Sampling (ST) – (ASTM D-1587) A relatively undisturbed soil sample is collected by hydraulically advancing a thin-walled Shelby Tube sampler into a soil mass. Shelby Tubes have a sharp cutting edge and are commonly 2 to 5 inches in diameter. Bulk Sample (BS) A relatively large volume of soils is collected with a shovel or other manually-operated tool. The sample is typically transported to Giles’ materials laboratory in a sealed bag or bucket. Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DC) – (ASTM STP 399) This test is conducted by driving a 1.5-inch-diameter cone into the subsoil using a 15- pound steel ring (hammer), free-falling a vertical distance of 20 inches. The number of hammer-blows required to drive the cone 1¾ inches is an indication of the soil strength and density, and is defined as “N”. The Dynamic Cone Penetration test is commonly conducted in hand auger borings, test pits and within excavated trenches. - Continued - GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Ring-Lined Barrel Sampling – (ASTM D 3550) In this procedure, a ring-lined barrel sampler is used to collect soil samples for classification and laboratory testing. This method provides samples that fit directly into laboratory test instruments without additional handling/disturbance. Sampling and Testing Procedures The field testing and sampling operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Results of the field testing (i.e. N-values) are reported on the Test Boring Logs. Explanations of the terms and symbols shown on the logs are provided on the appendix enclosure entitled “General Notes”. APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING AND CLASSIFICATION The laboratory testing was conducted under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer in accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Brief descriptions of laboratory tests commonly performed by Giles are provided herein. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. LABORATORY TESTING AND CLASSIFICATION Photoionization Detector (PID) In this procedure, soil samples are “scanned” in Giles’ analytical laboratory using a Photoionization Detector (PID). The instrument is equipped with an 11.7 eV lamp calibrated to a Benzene Standard and is capable of detecting a minute concentration of certain Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) vapors, such as those commonly associated with petroleum products and some solvents. Results of the PID analysis are expressed in HNu (manufacturer’s) units rather than actual concentration. Moisture Content (w) (ASTM D 2216) Moisture content is defined as the ratio of the weight of water contained within a soil sample to the weight of the dry solids within the sample. Moisture content is expressed as a percentage. Unconfined Compressive Strength (qu) (ASTM D 2166) An axial load is applied at a uniform rate to a cylindrical soil sample. The unconfined compressive strength is the maximum stress obtained or the stress when 15% axial strain is reached, whichever occurs first. Calibrated Penetrometer Resistance (qp) The small, cylindrical tip of a hand-held penetrometer is pressed into a soil sample to a prescribed depth to measure the soils capacity to resist penetration. This test is used to evaluate unconfined compressive strength. Vane-Shear Strength (qs) The blades of a vane are inserted into the flat surface of a soil sample and the vane is rotated until failure occurs. The maximum shear resistance measured immediately prior to failure is taken as the vane-shear strength. Loss-on-Ignition (ASTM D 2974; Method C) The Loss-on-Ignition (L.O.I.) test is used to determine the organic content of a soil sample. The procedure is conducted by heating a dry soil sample to 440°C in order to burn-off or “ash” organic matter present within the sample. The L.O.I. value is the ratio of the weight loss due to ignition compared to the initial weight of the dry sample. L.O.I. is expressed as a percentage. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Particle Size Distribution (ASTB D 421, D 422, and D 1140) This test is performed to determine the distribution of specific particle sizes (diameters) within a soil sample. The distribution of coarse-grained soil particles (sand and gravel) is determined from a “sieve analysis,” which is conducted by passing the sample through a series of nested sieves. The distribution of fine-grained soil particles (silt and clay) is determined from a “hydrometer analysis” which is based on the sedimentation of particles suspended in water. Consolidation Test (ASTM D 2435) In this procedure, a series of cumulative vertical loads are applied to a small, laterally confined soil sample. During each load increment, vertical compression (consolidation) of the sample is measured over a period of time. Results of this test are used to estimate settlement and time rate of settlement. Classification of Samples Each soil sample was visually-manually classified, based on texture and plasticity, in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2488-75). The classifications are reported on the Test Boring Logs. Laboratory Testing The laboratory testing operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Results of the laboratory tests are provided on the Test Boring Logs or other appendix enclosures. Explanation of the terms and symbols used on the logs is provided on the appendix enclosure entitled “General Notes.” GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Test ASTM D-1833 The CBR test is used for evaluation of a soil subgrade for pavement design. The test consists of measuring the force required for a 3-square-inch cylindrical piston to penetrate 0.1 or 0.2 inch into a compacted soil sample. The result is expressed as a percent of force required to penetrate a standard compacted crushed stone. Unless a CBR test has been specifically requested by the client, the CBR is estimated from published charts, based on soil classification and strength characteristics. A typical correlation chart is below. APPENDIX D GENERAL INFORMATION GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL COMMENTS The soil samples obtained during the subsurface exploration will be retained for a period of thirty days. If no instructions are received, they will be disposed of at that time. This report has been prepared exclusively for the client in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the architects and engineers in the design and preparation of the project plans and specifications. Copies of this report may be provided to contractor(s), with contract documents, to disclose information relative to this project. The report, however, has not been prepared to serve as the plans and specifications for actual construction without the appropriate interpretation by the project architect, structural engineer, and/or civil engineer. Reproduction and distribution of this report must be authorized by the client and Giles. This report has been based on assumed conditions/characteristics of the proposed development where specific information was not available. It is recommended that the architect, civil engineer and structural engineer along with any other design professionals involved in this project carefully review these assumptions to ensure they are consistent with the actual planned development. When discrepancies exist, they should be brought to our attention to ensure they do not affect the conclusions and recommendations provided herein. The project plans and specifications may also be submitted to Giles for review to ensure that the geotechnical related conclusions and recommendations provided herein have been correctly interpreted. The analysis of this site was based on a subsoil profile interpolated from a limited subsurface exploration. If the actual conditions encountered during construction vary from those indicated by the borings, Giles must be contacted immediately to determine if the conditions alter the recommendations contained herein. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. No other warranty is either expressed or implied. With Dust PalliativeWith Bituminous TreatmentGW Good: tractor, rubber-tired, steel wheel or vibratory roller125-135 Almost none Good drainage, perviousVery stable Excellent Good Fair topoorExcellentGP Good: tractor, rubber-tired, steel wheel or vibratory roller115-125 Almost none Good drainage, perviousReasonably stableExcellent to goodPoor to fair PoorGM Good: rubber-tired or light sheepsfoot roller120-135 SlightPoor drainage, semiperviousReasonably stableExcellent to goodFair to poor Poor Poor to fairGC Good to fair: rubber-tired or sheepsfoot roller115-130 SlightPoor drainage, imperviousReasonably stableGood Good to fair **Excellent ExcellentSW Good: tractor, rubber-tired or vibratory roller110-130 Almost none Good drainage, perviousVery stable Good Fair to poor Fair topoorGoodSP Good: tractor, rubber-tired or vibratory roller100-120 Almost none Good drainage, perviousReasonably stable when denseGood to fair Poor Poor Poor to fairSM Good: rubber-tired or sheepsfoot roller110-125 Slight Poor drainage, imperviousReasonably stable when denseGood to fair Poor Poor Poor to fairSC Good to fair: rubber-tired or sheepsfoot roller105-125 Slight tomediumPoor drainage, imperviousReasonably stableGood to fair Fair to poor Excellent ExcellentML Good to poor: rubber-tired or sheepsfoot roller95-120 Slight tomediumPoor drainage, imperviousPoor stability, high density requiredFair to poor Not suitable Poor PoorCL Good to fair: sheepsfoot or rubber-tired roller95-120 Medium No drainage, imperviousGood stability Fair to poor Not suitable Poor PoorOL Fair to poor: sheepsfoot or rubber-tired roller80-100 Medium to high Poor drainage, imperviousUnstable, should not be usedPoor Not suitable Not suitable Not suitableMH Fair to poor: sheepsfoot or rubber-tired roller70-95 High Poor drainage, imperviousPoor stability, should not be usedPoor Not suitable Very poor Not suitableCH Fair to poor: sheepsfoot roller 80-105 Very high No drainage, imperviousFair stability, may soften on expansionPoor to very poorNot suitable Very poor Not suitableOH Fair to poor: sheepsfoot roller 65-100 High No drainage, imperviousUnstable, should not be usedVery poor Not suitable NotsuitableNot suitablePt Not suitable Very high Fair to poor drainageShould not be usedNot suitable Not suitable NotsuitableNot suitable* "The Unified Classification: Appendix A - Characteristics of Soil, Groups Pertaining to Roads and Airfields, and Appendix B - Characteristics of Soil Groups Pertaining to Embankments and Foundations," Technical Memorandum 357, U.S. Waterways Ixperiment Station, Vicksburg, 1953.** Not suitable if subject to frost. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. CHARACTERISTICS AND RATINGS OF UNIFIED SOIL SYSTEM CLASSES FOR SOIL CONSTRUCTION *Value as Temporary PavementClassCompactionCharacteristicsMax. Dry Density Standard Proctor (pcf)Compressibility and ExpansionDrainage and PermeabilityValue as an Embankment MaterialValue as Subgrade When Not Subject to FrostValue as Base Course Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM D-2487) Major Divisions Group Symbols Typical Names Laboratory Classifi cation Criteria Coarse-grained soils(more than half of material is larger than No. 200 sieve size)Gravels(More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve size)Clean gravels(little or no fi nes)GW Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fi nes Determine percentages of sand and gravel from grain-size curve.Determine percentages of sand and gravel from grain-size curve.Depending on percentage of fi nes (fraction smaller than No. 200 sieve size), coarse-Depending on percentage of fi nes (fraction smaller than No. 200 sieve size), coarse-Depending on percentage of fi nes (fraction smaller than No. 200 sieve size), coarse-Depending on percentage of fi nes (fraction smaller than No. 200 sieve size), coarse-Depending on percentage of fi nes (fraction smaller than No. 200 sieve size), coarse-grained soils are classifi ed as follows: Less than 5 percent: GW, GP, SW, SP Less than 5 percent: GW, GP, SW, SP Less than 5 percent: GW, GP, SW, SP Less than 5 percent: GW, GP, SW, SP More than 12 percent: GM, GC, SM, SC More than 12 percent: GM, GC, SM, SC More than 12 percent: GM, GC, SM, SC More than 12 percent: GM, GC, SM, SC 5 to 12 percent: 5 to 12 percent: Borderline cases requiring dual symbolsbCu = greater than 4; Cc = between 1 and 3 GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtrues, little or no fi nes Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW Gravels with fi nes(appreciable amount of fi nes)GMa d Silty gravels, gravel- sand-silt mixtures Atterberg limits below “A” line or P.I. less than 4 Limits plotting within shaded area, above “A” line with P.I. between 4 and 7 are borderline cases requiring use of dual symbols u GC Clayey gravels, gravel- sand-clay mixtures Atterberg limits above “A” line or P.I. greater than 7 Sands(More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size)Clean sands(Little or no fi nes)SW Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fi nes Cu = greater than 4; Cc = between 1 and 3 SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fi nes Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW Sands with fi nes(Appreciable amount of fi nes)SMa d Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures Atterberg limits below “A” line or P.I. less than 4 Limits plotting within shaded area, above “A” line with P.I. between 4 and 7 are borderline cases requiring use of dual symbols u SC Clayey sands, sand-clay Clayey sands, sand-clay Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures Atterberg limits above “A” line or P.I. greater than 7 Fine-grained soils(More than half material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size)Silts and clays(Liquid limit less than 50)ML Inorganic silts and very fi ne sands, rock fl our, silty or clayey fi ne sands, or clayey silts with slight plasticity CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity Silts and clays(Liquid limit greater than 50)MH Inorganic silts, mica- ceous or diatomaceous fi ne sandy or silty soils, elastic silts CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silts Highly organic soilsPt Peat and other highly organic soils D = greater than 4; CD = greater than 4; C60 = greater than 4; C60 = greater than 4; CD = greater than 4; CD = greater than 4; C 10 = greater than 4; C (D = between 1 and 3 (D = between 1 and 330 = between 1 and 330 = between 1 and 3) = between 1 and 3) = between 1 and 3 2 D = between 1 and 3D = between 1 and 3 10 x D = between 1 and 3 x D = between 1 and 3 60 = between 1 and 3 D60 = greater than 4; C60 = greater than 4; CD = greater than 4; CD = greater than 4; C 10 = greater than 4; C (D = between 1 and 3 (D = between 1 and 330 = between 1 and 330 = between 1 and 3) = between 1 and 3) = between 1 and 3 2 D = between 1 and 3D = between 1 and 3 10 x D = between 1 and 3 x D = between 1 and 3 60 = between 1 and 3 Plasticity Chart Plasticity Index0 10 50 1000 10 50 10020900 10 50 1000 10 50 100800 10 50 10020900 10 50 100800 10 50 1000 10 50 100700 10 50 10020900 10 50 100700 10 50 1000 10 50 100600 10 50 10020900 10 50 100600 10 50 1000 10 50 100400 10 50 10020900 10 50 100400 10 50 1000 10 50 100300 10 50 10020900 10 50 100300 10 50 1000 10 50 60 40 20 30 CH OH and MHOH and MH CL ML and OLML and OL CL-ML “A” lineLiquid Limit a Division of GM and SM groups into subdivisions of d and u are for roads and airfi elds only. Subdivision is based on Atterberg limits, suffi x d used when L.L. is 28 or less and the P.I. is 6 or less; the suffi x u is used when L.L. is greater than 28. b Borderline classifi cations, used for soils possessing characteristics of two groups, are designated by combinations of group sympols. For example GW-GC, well-graded gravel-sand mixture with clay binder. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL NOTES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION All samples are visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487-75 or D-2488-75) DESCRIPTIVE TERM (% BY DRY WEIGHT) PARTICLE SIZE (DIAMETER) Trace: 1-10% Boulders: 8 inch and larger Little: 11-20% Cobbles: 3 inch to 8 inch Some: 21-35% Gravel: coarse - ¾ to 3 inch And/Adjective 36-50% fine – No. 4 (4.76 mm) to ¾ inch Sand: coarse – No. 4 (4.76 mm) to No. 10 (2.0 mm) medium – No. 10 (2.0 mm) to No. 40 (0.42 mm) fine – No. 40 (0.42 mm) to No. 200 (0.074 mm) Silt: No. 200 (0.074 mm) and smaller (non-plastic) Clay: No 200 (0.074 mm) and smaller (plastic) SOIL PROPERTY SYMBOLS DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS Dd: Dry Density (pcf) SS: Split-Spoon LL: Liquid Limit, percent ST: Shelby Tube – 3 inch O.D. (except where noted) PL: Plastic Limit, percent CS: 3 inch O.D. California Ring Sampler PI: Plasticity Index (LL-PL) DC: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer per ASTM LOI: Loss on Ignition, percent Special Technical Publication No. 399 Gs: Specific Gravity AU: Auger Sample K: Coefficient of Permeability DB: Diamond Bit w: Moisture content, percent CB: Carbide Bit qp: Calibrated Penetrometer Resistance, tsf WS: Wash Sample qs: Vane-Shear Strength, tsf RB: Rock-Roller Bit qu: Unconfined Compressive Strength, tsf BS: Bulk Sample qc: Static Cone Penetrometer Resistance Note: Depth intervals for sampling shown on Record of (correlated to Unconfined Compressive Strength, tsf) Subsurface Exploration are not indicative of sample PID: Results of vapor analysis conducted on representative recovery, but position where sampling initiated samples utilizing a Photoionization Detector calibrated to a benzene standard. Results expressed in HNU-Units. (BDL=Below Detection Limit) N: Penetration Resistance per 12 inch interval, or fraction thereof, for a standard 2 inch O.D. (1⅜ inch I.D.) split spoon sampler driven with a 140 pound weight free-falling 30 inches. Performed in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test Specifications (ASTM D- 1586). N in blows per foot equals sum of N-Values where plus sign (+) is shown. Nc: Penetration Resistance per 1¾ inches of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. Approximately equivalent to Standard Penetration Test N-Value in blows per foot. Nr: Penetration Resistance per 12 inch interval, or fraction thereof, for California Ring Sampler driven with a 140 pound weight free-falling 30 inches per ASTM D-3550. Not equivalent to Standard Penetration Test N-Value. SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS COHESIVE (CLAYEY) SOILS NON-COHESIVE (GRANULAR) SOILS UNCONFINED COMPARATIVE BLOWS PER COMPRESSIVE RELATIVE BLOWS PER CONSISTENCY FOOT (N) STRENGTH (TSF) DENSITY FOOT (N) Very Soft 0 - 2 0 - 0.25 Very Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 - 4 0.25 - 0.50 Loose 5 - 10 Medium Stiff 5 – 8 0.50 - 1.00 Firm 11 - 30 Stiff 9 – 15 1.00 - 2.00 Dense 31 - 50 Very Stiff 16 – 30 2.00 - 4.00 Very Dense 51+ Hard 31+ 4.00+ DEGREE OF DEGREE OF EXPANSIVE PLASTICITY PI POTENTIAL PI None to Slight 0 - 4 Low 0 - 15 Slight 5 - 10 Medium 15 - 25 Medium 11 - 30 High 25+ High to Very High 31+ APPENDIX 8.4 Hazardous Materials Documentation RED Asbestos and Lead Identification Survey Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Prepared for: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Irvine, California May 24 , 2017 Project No. 2E-1610014 Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street Orange, CA 92868 Presented to: Monica Sell Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 1965 N. Main Street Orange, CA 92865 Inspection Date: May 10, 2017 Conducted by: Anthony M. De Arcos Certified Asbestos Consultant Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor Registered Environmental Property Assessor National Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 2201 Francisco Dr., Ste.140-261 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Office: (916) 361-0555 | Fax: (916) 361-0540 E-Mail: NAL1@NAL1.com | Web Page: www.NAL1.com 38085/38086 May 15, 2017 Monica Sell Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 1965 N. Main Street Orange, CA 92865 RE: Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey – Demolition Project Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street Orange, CA 92868 Dear Ms. Sell, The following report is in regards to the building inspection conducted at the above address. Of the thirty four (34) suspected asbestos containing samples collected, two (2) were found to contain asbestos containing construction materials (ACCM). Of the thirty-three (33) Portable X-ray Fluorescent (XRF) lead shots collected at the site, combined into nine (9) suspected lead containing areas tested, two (2) were found to contain Lead Containing Material (LCM). Although the property was constructed in the early 1960’s, the interior of property was fully gutted and renovated in 2007. Anthony M. De Arcos, Certified Asbestos Consultant, Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor, and Registered Environmental Property Assessor, for National Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (N.A.L.), conducted the inspection on May 10, 2017. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Based on the asbestos sample results, the Gray-Black Mastic (~225 sf), Main and Lower Roofs, were found to contain ACCM. All square footage should be verified by contractor. Based on the lead sample results, the Multi-Colored Paint surfaces were found to contain LCM levels above the OSHA Limit of Detection. SECTION I: ASBESTOS INSPECTION - The inspection was completed according to the EPA’s Asbestos Containing Building Materials (ACBM) In-Schools Rule; 40 CFR 763.85 (Inspection and Re-Inspection). Currently, EPA regulations classify ACBM as materials containing more that 1-percent (1%) of asbestos. Cal- OSHA currently regulates asbestos to 1/10th of 1% (0.1%) and requires that a certified asbestos worker conduct this work. Upon completion of the visual inspection, the suspect asbestos bulk sample materials were collected in accordance with EPA and OSHA protocol. They were placed into new, air tight, Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street, Orange, CA May 15, 2017 Page 3 of 9 38085/38086 plastic bags, sealed, and identified with unique identification numbers. The bulk samples were transported to the laboratory under chain of custody protocol for analysis. Destructive sampling was conducted during the site visit, as the building is scheduled for demolition. If during the demolition work reveals any unforeseen suspect materials; the contractor shall stop work and contact the project manager for further testing. MicroTest Laboratories, Inc. located in Fair Oaks, California analyzed the bulk suspect asbestos containing samples utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Method. National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Certification #200999-0 certifies MicroTest Laboratories, Inc. Although not all the rooms or materials throughout the site were sampled, the like materials that were not tested will be treated as homogeneous to the materials that were tested, and will be considered as containing ACCM or non-ACCM in accordance to the results. The location and results of suspect samples found to contain ACCM are as follows: Sample ID # Material Description Sample Location Category Results 202-30 Gray-Black Mastic Exterior Main & Lower Flat Roofs, Roof Penetrations, Various Areas I 3% Chrysotile 202-31 Gray-Black Mastic Main Roof, North End, West & East, HVAC Units, Patches & Repairs, Various Areas I 3% Chrysotile sf = Square Feet; Category I & II are non-friable/non-hazardous materials The Gray-Black Mastic is considered Category I, non-friable/non-hazardous material, which can be removed and disposed of at a non-hazardous waste facility. The following samples were non-asbestos containing materials: Sample ID # Material Description Sample Location Results 202-1 Seam Tape/Gray Mastic Lower South & Main Roofs, HVAC Round Ducts (-80 sf) None Detected 202-2 2'x4' Pin Hole-Tiny Fissure Acoustical Ceiling Tile Kitchen, South End, North Locker Room (-16 sf) None Detected 202-3 2'x4' Sheetrock Panel Kitchen & Southwest Storage Room (-600 sf) None Detected 202-4 Plaster Kitchen, North Storage Room, North Wall, East End (-4,300 sf) None Detected 202-5 Plaster Kitchen, North Storage Room, North Wall, Center None Detected 202-6 Plaster Kitchen, North Storage Room, North Wall, West End None Detected 202-7 Plaster Kitchen, North Storage Room, West Restroom, East Wall, None Detected Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street, Orange, CA May 15, 2017 Page 4 of 9 38085/38086 Sample ID # Material Description Sample Location Results 202-8 Plaster Kitchen, South Storage-Locker Room, North Wall None Detected 202-9 Sprayed-on Acoustic Overspray 2nd Floor, Pink Room, Attic Truss' Above Access Panel (-15 sf) None Detected 202-10 Sheetrock-Joint Compound Southeast Dining Room, Northwest Outside Corner None Detected 202-11 Sheetrock-Joint Compound Northwest Exit Corridor, South Wall None Detected 202-12 Sheetrock-Joint Compound Women's Restroom, North Stall, Ceiling Above Door (water damage) None Detected 202-13 Sheetrock-Joint Compound Kitchen, South Center Room, Outside Corner None Detected 202-14 Sheetrock-Joint Compound 2nd Floor, Pink Room, Bar Area, Outside Corner None Detected 202-15 Sheetrock-Joint Compound Lower Banquet Room, Northeast Seating Area, Soffit Ceiling None Detected 202-16 Carpet Yellow-Black Mastic South Waiting Room, Southeast Corner None Detected 202-17 1/2"x6" W ood Plank Floors Yellow-Black Mastic Interior 1st Floor, South End None Detected 202-18 Carpet Yellow Glue Northwest Exit Corridor None Detected 202-19 FRP Tan Mastic Kitchen, Storage & Restrooms None Detected 202-20 24" Tan Ceramic Tile Grout Northeast Dining Room, Concrete Floor None Detected 202-21 6" Red Ceramic Tile Grout Kitchen, Storage & Restroom Floors None Detected 202-22 Ceramic Tile Mortar Men & W omen Restrooms, Wall & Floor None Detected 202-23 6" Red Ceramic Tile Mortar Kitchen, Storage & Restrooms None Detected 202-24 24" Tan Ceramic Tile Mortar Northeast Dining Room None Detected 202-25 Mortar Exterior South Brick & Decorative Rock None Detected 202-26 Concrete Main Building, 1st & Lower Floors, 5 Hit Composite None Detected 202-27 Built-Up Brown Roofing Exterior Lower Flat Roofs (~640 sf) None Detected 202-28 Grout Men & W omen Restrooms, Wall & Floor None Detected 202-29A Brown Composition Roof Shingle Main Truss' Roof, Northwest Corner, Top Layer None Detected 202-29B Black Roof Felt Main Truss' Roof, Northwest Corner, 2nd Layer None Detected 202-29C Brown Composition Roof Shingle Main Truss' Roof, Northwest Corner, 3rd Layer None Detected 202-29D Black Roof Felt Main Truss' Roof, Northwest Corner, Bottom Layer None Detected sf = Square Feet Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street, Orange, CA May 15, 2017 Page 5 of 9 38085/38086 ASBESTOS RECOMMENDATION – Federal and state regulations require that anyone disturbing asbestos containing materials are properly trained certified and have the required respiratory protection and medical surveillance. On-Site Observation should be conducted by N.A.L.’s Certified Asbestos Consultant or Certified Site Surveillance Technician to verify that the work plan/specification is being followed. Once a certified asbestos contractor has removed the ACCM, following EPA and OSHA requirements; at the minimum a visual inspection should be completed at the site prior to the demolition of the building. The clearance will confirm that the general contractor can reoccupy the work area(s), without concern for exposure to asbestos airborne fibers to their employees thus allowing the demolition work to be completed by the general contractor. SECTION II: LEAD INSPECTION - The lead suspect samples were collected according to the Housing Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Public Health Department (formally DHS), who regulate and require the abatement or in-place management of LBP hazards equal to or greater than 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) of lead by XRF Analysis or more than 0.5% lead by weight by laboratory flame atomic absorption. The following regulation shall be adhered to because OSHA considers all surfaces to contain lead: OSHA’s 29 CFR 1926.62, California Occupational Safety and Health Standard, Title 8 (Cal/OSHA 8 CCR 1532.1). Upon completion of the visual inspection, suspect painted finishes and/or materials were sampled for potential lead content, in accordance with EPA and OSHA protocol. They were labeled with a unique identification number and analyzed. Justin S. Gardner, utilizing the Thermo Scientific Portable X-ray Fluorescent (XRF) analyzer, analyzed the lead samples. When a sample is measured using XRF, each element present in the sample emits its own unique fluorescent x-ray energy spectrum. By simultaneously measuring the fluorescent x-rays emitted by the different elements in the sample, we can rapidly determine the presence of lead in the sample. Although not all the rooms or materials (non-suspect) were sampled, the like materials that were not tested and their results will be treated as homogeneous and the materials will be treated as containing LCM throughout the site. Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street, Orange, CA May 15, 2017 Page 6 of 9 38085/38086 The locations and results of the suspect samples found to be LCM are as follows: Sample ID # Material Description Sample Location Component XRF #’s Mg/cm² 202-8L Multi-Colored Paint Exterior W indow Trim, Various Areas 24-29 0.5 LBP 202-9L Multi-Colored Paint Exterior W ood Siding, Rafter Tails & Overhangs, Various Areas 30-35 0.24 LCM Prior to the demolition work being completed and/or the transporting of the debris from the site, Health and Safety Code 25157.8 (AB 2784 National Resources) requires that all lead debris be sampled for Waste Characterization. This will assist the Contractor in making a determination of whether or not the material is to be considered Hazardous or Non-Hazardous Lead waste or general construction debris. The sequence of testing to be completed by the Contractor is as follows: i Total Threshold Limit concentration (TTLC) with a result of 50 mg/kg or more but less than 1,000 mg/kg of lead must be retested using the Soluble Threshold Limit concentration (STLC) method; i A STLC result of 5.0 mg/L or greater is considered California Hazardous Waste; i Total Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing shall only be accomplished when approved by the Owners Representative; This procedure shall be generally reserved for out-of-state shipments; and A TCLP result of 5.0 mg/L or more deems the waste Federal RCRA materials; and i The California hazardous waste threshold for total lead using STLC is 5 mg/L and i Lead paint that is intact on a surface does not permit the material to be classed as non- hazardous. Waste profiling shall be accomplished if the paint contains more than 350 ppm by Flame AAS. Exception: Metals that are coated with paint are to be recycled. The following painted surfaces were found to be less than (<) the OSHA’s Limit of Detection: Sample ID # Material Description Sample Location/Component XRF #’s Mg/cm² 202-1L Brown-White Paint Interior Door Components, Various Areas 3-5 <0.02 202-2L White-Brown Paint Interior Trim & Baseboard, Various Areas 6-8 <0.02 202-3L Tan-White Paint Interior Sheetrock Walls 9-11 <0.02 202-4L Brown Paint Northeast Dining & Entry East Wall 12-14 <0.02 202-5L 6" Red Ceramic Tile Kitchen Floors, Over Concrete 15-17 <0.02 202-6L 24" Tan Ceramic Tile Northeast Dining Floor 18-20 <0.02 202-7L 6" Tan Cove Base Ceramic Tile Men's, Women's & Kitchen Walls 21-23 <0.04 Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street, Orange, CA May 15, 2017 Page 7 of 9 38085/38086 LEAD RECOMMENDATION - In order to stabilize the current lead conditions, N.A.L. recommends Lead Certified Workers certified by The California Department of Public Health or/a EPA certified Renovator, Repair and Painting (RRP) designation, conduct in-place management work of the LCM surfaces scheduled for demolition. The Contractor shall be required to abate/remove all loose and flaky LBM debris from the building by bagging or burrito wrapping loose flaky paint, prior to the removal of the debris from the work area(s), and subsequently the site. Once the abatement, in-place management, and/or prep work is completed and the areas are stabilized, the existing surfaces will be in good condition and not create a health or safety concern to the workers conducting the general construction work at the site. A Scope of Work, and/or specifications, should be utilized to conduct the lead work at the site. Included at the end of this report are site photographs, laboratory analytical results, chain of custody forms, and asbestos sample location map. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance, please contact our office. Reviewed and submitted by: Anthony M. De Arcos Certified Asbestos Consultant DOSH #92-0261 Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor CDPH #2406 Registered Environmental Property Assessor REPA #938322039 Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street, Orange, CA May 15, 2017 Page 8 of 9 38085/38086 Photograph # 1 202 South Main Street, Orange Date of Inspection: May 10, 2017 Subject: Photograph # 2 202 South Main Street, Orange Date of Inspection: May 10, 2017 Subject: Asbestos and Lead Building Inspection/Survey Future Chick Fil A 202 South Main Street, Orange, CA May 15, 2017 Page 9 of 9 38085/38086 Photograph # 3 202 South Main Street, Orange Date of Inspection: May 10, 2017 Subject: Photograph # 4 202 South Main Street, Orange Date of Inspection: May 10, 2017 Subject: IndexReading NoTime InspectorSite Side Room Color Substrate Component PbC Units DurationDepth Index 1 2 2017-05-1215:38 JG CALIBRATE 1.70 +/- 0.50 mg/ cm ^2 1.08 1.23 2 3 2017-05-1215:41 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR BROWN-WHITE WOOD DOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.00 3 4 2017-05-1215:41 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR BROWN-WHITE WOOD DOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.00 4 5 2017-05-1215:41 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR BROWN-WHITE WOOD DOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.00 5 6 2017-05-1215:42 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR WHITE-BROWN WOOD TRIM-BASEBOARD 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.08 1.00 6 7 2017-05-1215:43 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR WHITE-BROWN WOOD TRIM-BASEBOARD 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.08 1.00 7 8 2017-05-1215:43 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR WHITE-BROWN WOOD TRIM-BASEBOARD 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.00 8 9 2017-05-1215:44 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR TAN DRYWALL WALL 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.00 9 10 2017-05-1215:44 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR TAN DRYWALL WALL 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.08 1.00 10 11 2017-05-1215:44 JG 202S MAINST INTERIOR TAN DRYWALL WALL 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.08 1.00 11 12 2017-05-1215:46 JG 202S MAINST NEDINING BROWN DRYWALL WALL 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.71 1.00 12 13 2017-05-1215:46 JG 202S MAINST NEDINING BROWN DRYWALL WALL 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.28 1.00 13 14 2017-05-1215:47 JG 202S MAINST NEDINING BROWN DRYWALL WALL 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.00 14 15 2017-05-1215:48 JG 202S MAINST KITCHEN RED CERAMIC TILE FLOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 2.03 1.00 15 16 2017-05-1215:48 JG 202S MAINST KITCHEN RED CERAMIC TILE FLOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 2.25 1.00 16 17 2017-05-1215:48 JG 202S MAINST KITCHEN RED CERAMIC TILE FLOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.71 1.00 17 18 2017-05-1215:49 JG 202S MAINST NEDINING BEIGE CERAMIC TILE FLOOR 0.01 +/- 0.05 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.63 18 19 2017-05-1215:49 JG 202S MAINST NEDINING BEIGE CERAMIC TILE FLOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.00 19 20 2017-05-1215:50 JG 202S MAINST NEDINING BEIGE CERAMIC TILE FLOOR 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 1.92 1.00 20 21 2017-05-1215:51 JG 202S MAINST MENS RR TAN CERAMIC TILE COVEBASE 0.01 +/- 0.03 mg/ cm ^2 1.08 1.00 21 22 2017-05-1215:51 JG 202S MAINST MENS RR TAN CERAMIC TILE COVEBASE 0.01 +/- 0.04 mg/ cm ^2 1.07 1.25 22 23 2017-05-1215:51 JG 202S MAINST MENS RR TAN CERAMIC TILE COVEBASE 0.01 +/- 0.04 mg/ cm ^2 1.08 1.34 23 24 2017-05-1215:53 JG 202S MAINST EXWINDOW WHITE WOOD TRIM 0.50 +/- 0.30 mg/ cm ^2 3.13 1.00 24 25 2017-05-1215:53 JG 202S MAINST EXWINDOW WHITE WOOD TRIM 0.50 +/- 0.30 mg/ cm ^2 3.12 1.00 25 26 2017-05-1215:53 JG 202S MAINST EXWINDOW WHITE WOOD TRIM 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 2.77 1.00 26 27 2017-05-1215:54 JG 202S MAINST EXWINDOW WHITE WOOD TRIM 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 2.25 1.00 27 28 2017-05-1215:54 JG 202S MAINST EXWINDOW WHITE WOOD TRIM 0.00 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 3.75 1.00 28 29 2017-05-1215:56 JG 202S MAINST EXWINDOW WHITE WOOD TRIM 0.01 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 6.24 2.93 29 30 2017-05-1215:59 JG 202S MAINST EXTERIOR MULTI COLORED WOOD SIDING-OVERHANG 0.24 +/- 0.12 mg/ cm ^2 3.01 1.72 30 31 2017-05-1216:00 JG 202S MAINST EXTERIOR MULTI COLORED WOOD SIDING-OVERHANG 0.10 +/- 0.06 mg/ cm ^2 3.86 2.52 31 32 2017-05-1216:00 JG 202S MAINST EXTERIOR MULTI COLORED WOOD SIDING-OVERHANG 0.01 +/- 0.02 mg/ cm ^2 3.97 1.61 32 33 2017-05-1216:00 JG 202S MAINST EXTERIOR MULTI COLORED WOOD SIDING-OVERHANG 0.11 +/- 0.09 mg/ cm ^2 2.48 1.50 33 34 2017-05-1216:01 JG 202S MAINST EXTERIOR MULTI COLORED WOOD SIDING-OVERHANG 0.10 +/- 0.16 mg/ cm ^2 0.75 1.03 Page 1of 2 05/12/1713:15:23 IndexReading NoTime InspectorSite Side Room Color Substrate Component PbC Units DurationDepth Index 34 35 2017-05-1216:01 JG 202S MAINST EXTERIOR MULTI COLORED WOOD SIDING-OVERHANG 0.25 +/- 0.15 mg/ cm ^2 2.80 2.15 35 36 2017-05-1216:09 JG CALIBRATE 4.40 +/- 3.30 mg/ cm ^2 0.21 1.42 Page 2of 2 05/12/1713:15:23 Page Login # 1 of 1 38086 NAL LOG-IN RECORD Ph: 916.361.0555 Fx: 916.361.0540 National Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Job Site/Job #: Client#-Lot# 1103 / 186 Future Chick-Fil A: Date 5/11/2017 Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 202 South Main Street Sampling Date: 5/10/2017 Phone Number Orange, CA 92868 Sampling Time 10:00:00 AM FAX Number Type Of Work: Lead BI Contact Monica Sell No. of Samples 9 E-Mail Address Turnaround: 6 hours Chain of Custody Information Released By Signature Date/ Time Received By Signature Date/ Time Due: 05/11/17 0830 Released By Signature Date/ Time Received By Signature Date/ Time At: Num. Sample ID# Location/Description 1 202-1L Interior Door Components, Various Areas \ Brown-White Paint 2 202-2L Interior Trim & Baseboard, Various Areas \ White-Brown Paint 3 202-3L Interior Sheetrock Walls \ Tan-White Paint 4 202-4L Northeast Dining & Entry East Wall \ Brown Paint 5 202-5L Kitchen Floors, Over Concrete \ 6" Red Ceramic Tile 6 202-6L Northeast Dining Room \ 24" Tan Ceramic Tile 7 202-7L Men's, Women's & Kitchen Walls \ 6" Tan Cove Base Ceramic Tile 8 202-8L Exterior W indow Trim, Various Areas \ Multi-Colored Paint 9 202-9L Exterior W ood Siding, Rafter Tails & Overhangs, Various Areas \ Multi-Colored Paint 9- 14- GREEN Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Prepared For: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Irvine, California November 21, 2016 Project No. 2E-1610014 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 4003 MAIN & ALMOND FSU 202 SOUTH MAIN STREET ORANGE, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 2E-1610014 Section No. Description Page 1. SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND LIMITATIONS .................................................................. 2 3.1. Scope of Services ............................................................................................... 2 3.2. Limitations and Exceptions ................................................................................. 3 4. OWNER/USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ................................................................. 3 4.1. User Questionnaire ............................................................................................. 3 4.2. Recorded Land Title Records.............................................................................. 4 4.3. Previous Environmental Reports ......................................................................... 4 5. SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 4 5.1. Setting and Location ........................................................................................... 4 5.2. Surrounding Area ................................................................................................ 4 6. SUBJECT PROPERTY OBSERVATIONS ..................................................................... 4 6.1. Current Property Use and Activity ....................................................................... 5 6.2. Observations ....................................................................................................... 5 7. INTERVIEWS ................................................................................................................. 6 8. HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ............................................................................... 6 8.1. Aerial Photographs ............................................................................................. 6 8.2. City Directories ................................................................................................... 7 8.3. Fire Insurance Maps ..........................................................................................11 8.4. Chain-of-Title/Environmental Lien ......................................................................11 9. PHYSICAL SETTING INFORMATION ..........................................................................11 9.1. USGS Topographic Map ....................................................................................11 9.2. Geologic Conditions ...........................................................................................12 10. ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW ......................................................................12 10.1. Local Sources ....................................................................................................12 10.2. State Sources ....................................................................................................15 10.3. Federal Sources ................................................................................................17 11. VAPOR ENCROACHMENT SCREENING ....................................................................19 12. GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION ................................................................................20 13. FINDINGS AND OPINIONS ..........................................................................................20 14. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................21 15. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................22 16. DATA GAPS .................................................................................................................22 17. GENERAL COMMENTS ...............................................................................................22 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Project No. 2E-1610014 Section No. Description Page GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURES Figure 1 Subject Property Location .................................................................................. 4a Figure 2 Surrounding Property Usage .............................................................................. 4b APPENDICES Appendix A Important Information about Your Geoenvironmental Report Appendix B Resumes Appendix C User Questionnaire Appendix D Photographs Appendix E Aerial Photographs Appendix F Chain-of-Title and Environmental Lien Search Appendix G Environmental Records Appendix H ERIS Database Report GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 4003 MAIN & ALMOND FSU 202 SOUTH MAIN STREET ORANGE, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 2E-1610014 1. SUMMARY The summary is provided solely for purposes of overview. Any party who relies on this report must read the full report. The summary omits a number of details, any one of which could be crucial to the proper application of this report. Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (Giles) has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E 1527-13 for the property located at 202 South Main Street, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California (subject property). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 3.2. Pertinent information relative to this assessment is enclosed within Appendix A. We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. This assessment has revealed no evidence of historic recognized environmental conditions or recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. Based on the findings and conclusions of this assessment, no further environmental investigation is recommended to be performed on the subject property. GREEN– No significant environmental concerns/problems were detected which are unusual or not typical to this general area. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 2 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 2. INTRODUCTION A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) has been completed by Giles on the proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 property located at 202 South Main Street, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California (subject property). The assessment was performed at the request of Ms. Beth Witt of Chick-fil-A, Inc. This report is an instrument of service prepared for the exclusive use of Chick -fil-A, Inc., and may not be reproduced or distributed without written authorization from Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. and Chick-fil-A, Inc. The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify recognized environmental conditions (as defined by ASTM) in connection with the subject property. This Phase I ESA is intended to permit the user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for innocent landowner defense, contiguous property owner or bona fide prospective purchaser (collectively Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs)) for limitations on CERCLA liability as stated in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, 42 USC § 9601(35), 9601 (40), 9607(b), 9607 (q) and 9607 (r)). Ms. Monica Sell conducted reconnaissance activities on November 10, 2016. Resumes of environmental professionals directly responsible for this assessment are enclosed within Appendix B. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND LIMITATIONS 3.1. Scope of Services The Phase I ESA has been performed in general accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13. The scope of services included: • A visual reconnaissance of the subject property and a cursory evaluation of adjoining properties; • Interviews of existing and/or former owners and/or operators of the subject property, and individuals who have knowledge of the subject property and surrounding areas; • A review of available federal, state, tribal, county, and local registries of known environmental concerns; • A review of available and applicable building inspection, permitting, and other environmental records maintained by county and/or local agencies, and interviews with agency representatives; • A review of available aerial photographs, city directories, fire insurance maps, geological maps, hydrogeological maps, and United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps; Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 3 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. • Complete a limited Tier 1 and Tier 2 Vapor Encroachment Screening of the subject property; and • An evaluation of the information collected and the preparation of this report summarizing the scope of services and the resulting conclusions and recommendations. 3.2. Limitations and Exceptions The limitations of this Phase I ESA included: • "Non-Scope Considerations" such as asbestos containing material, radon, lead- based paint, lead in drinking water, wetlands, regulatory compliance, cultural and historic resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, endangered species, indoor air quality, and high-voltage power lines were not included as part of this assessment. • Access to the interior of the structure on the subject property was not available at the time of the site visit. 4. OWNER/USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4.1. User Questionnaire A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment User Questionnaire (ESA Questionnaire) was submitted to the client (user). The ESA Questionnaire was completed by the user, and is enclosed in Appendix C. The following is a summary of information provided in the ESA Questionnaire: 4.1.1. Reason for Performing the Phase I ESA The user indicated that the Phase I ESA was requested for due diligence, and to determine if suitable for a Chick-fil-A freestanding restaurant on subject property. 4.1.2. Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information The user of the report indicated that the subject property is currently owned by 202 S. Main Street, LLC. The site contact is Ms. Julie Vieillemaringe of ANR Asset Management Brokerage. 4.1.3. Environmental Liens and Activity and Land Use Limitations The user of the report was unaware of any environmental liens or activity use limitations associated with the subject property. 4.1.4. Relationship of Price to Fair Market Value The user of the report indicated that the purchase price of the subject property is applicable to the fair market value. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 4 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4.1.5. User's Knowledge of Contamination on the Subject Property The user was not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property. The user indicated that the subject property was currently operating as a steak and seafood restaurant. 4.2. Recorded Land Title Records A chain-of-title and environmental lien search for the subject property was not provided by the client. Giles ordered an environmental lien search and chain-of-title for the subject property from Environmental Risk Information Services, Inc. (ERIS). Please refer to section 8.4 for a summary of the environmental lien search and chain-of-title. 4.3. Previous Environmental Reports We were not provided with any previous environmental reports. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 5.1. Setting and Location The subject property is located at 202 South Main Street, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California. The subject property is situated at latitude 33.785º north, longitude - 117.867º west . The following Figure 1 illustrates the generalized location of the subject property. 5.2. Surrounding Area Northwest, North: West Almond Avenue, Wells Fargo, Anjali MD Dermatology, Residential, Retail Shopping Center Northeast: Intersection of West Almond Avenue and South Main Street, Main Auto Care, Orange Independent Auto Repair, Transmission Unlimited, Chili Pepper, The Church of Christ East: South Main Street, Genetics Center, Residential Southeast: South Main Street, Genetics Center, Caesar’s Uniforms, Law Office, Days Inn South, Southwest: Medical Offices, Parking Structure, Residential West: Chez Grand’Mere Preschool, Residential The subject property and surrounding area land uses are illustrated on the following Figure 2. Photographs of the subject property and surrounding area are enclosed within Appendix D. 6. SUBJECT PROPERTY OBSERVATIONS Ms. Monica Sell conducted the reconnaissance activities on November 10, 2016. The visual and physical reconnaissance of the subject property and surrounding area was Source: USGS Orange, California 7.5-Minute Series (topographic) Quadrangle Map (1964, photorevised 1981). Scale: 1:24,000 Contour Interval: 20 Feet FIGURE 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property SUBJECT PROPERTY W. ALMOND AVE.S. MAIN STREETS. McCOY ROADW. ROBIN RD.(202)GRAND'MERE PRESCHOOL (1510) CHEZ RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESI DE NTI AL RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER (146) ANJALI MD DERMATOLOGY / WELLS FARGO (170) CHILI PEPPER (167) TRANSMISSION UNLIMITED (185) ORANGE INDEPENDENT AUTO REPAIR (187) MAIN AUTO CARE (193) (LUST)RESIDENTIALGENETICS CENTER (211) (LUST) CAESAR'S UNIFORMS (273) LAW OFFICE (275) DAYS INN (279) MEDICAL OFFICES (280) MEDICAL OFFICES (230) RESIDENTIAL PARKING STRUCTURE THE CHURCH OF CHRIST RESIDENTIAL(FORMER ROGER MILLER FORD) (LUST, RCRA GEN) ILES NGINEERING SSOCIATES, INC. DATE CAD No. 11-16-16 2E-1610014PROJECT NO.: ORANGE, CALIFORNIA DESIGNED MLS DRAWN JSZ SCALE NTS REVISED 2E1610014-sp -- 202 SOUTH MAIN STREET SURROUNDING PROPERTY USAGE FIGURE 2 NOTES: 1.) BASE MAP DEVELOPED FROM A 2015 AERIAL. LEGEND: CURRENT ADDRESSES(202) LISTINGS (IN ORANGE) REPRESENT(LUST) SITES INCLUDED IN REVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 04003 MAIN & ALMOND FSU 1965 N. MAIN STREET ORANGE, CA 92865 (714)279-0817 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 5 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. completed in a systematic approach, including walking the perimeter of the subject property. Weather conditions at the time of the assessment were sunny, with temperatures around 80ºF. 6.1. Current Property Use and Activity The subject property is currently developed with a vacant restaurant and asphalt paved parking lot. Several trees were located along the northern, western, and southern property boundaries. The topography of the subject property is generally flat. 6.2. Observations • Hazardous Substances ....................................................................... None Observed • Petroleum Products ............................................................................ None Observed • Pipelines ............................................................................................. None Observed • Storage Tanks Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) ............................................. None Observed Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) ............................................. None Observed • Odors................................................................................................... None Detected • Pools of Liquid .................................................................................... None Observed • Drums or Other Containers ................................................................. None Observed • Potential Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) sources Electrical Equipment .............................................................................. Observed Two pole mounted transformers were observed adjacent to the northern property boundary. The transformers appeared to be in good condition, with no signs of leaking. Hydraulic Equipment ..................................................................... None Observed • Waste Water Surface Water Discharge .............................................................. None Observed Process/Sanitary Discharge ................................................................... Observed The subject property is reportedly connected to the City of Orange sewer system. Septic Systems ............................................................................. None Observed Industrial Wastewater Treatment .................................................. None Observed Holding Tanks ............................................................................... None Observed • Potable Water Supply Municipal ............................................................................................... Observed The subject property is reportedly connected to the City of Orange water system. Private .......................................................................................... None Observed • Wells................................................................................................... None Observed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 6 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. • Pits, Ponds or Lagoons ....................................................................... None Observed • Stained Soil or Pavement ............................................................................ Observed De minimis staining from automobiles was noted in the parking area of the subject property. • Stressed Vegetation ........................................................................... None Observed • Solid Waste Storage .................................................................................................. Observed A trash enclosure containing no dumpsters was observed adjacent to the west of the building located on the subject property. On-Site Disposal ........................................................................... None Observed • Heating/Cooling ................................................................................. None Observed • Staining or Corrosion ................................................................................... Observed De minimis staining from automobiles was noted in the parking area of the subject property. • Drains or Sumps ................................................................................ None Observed 7. INTERVIEWS Giles contacted Ms. Julie Vieillemaringe, the site contact listed on the User Questionnaire and inquired about the presence or knowledge of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property. Ms. Vieillemaringe was not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the property and did not know when the existing building was initially constructed on the property. She indicated that the property has been occupied by various restaurants including the Iron Horse Restaurant, La Brasserie, Manhattan Supper Club, and Manhattan Steak & Seafood Restaurant. 8. HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION 8.1. Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs of the subject property and general vicinity, dated 1938, 1947, 1963, 1972, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1995, 2002, 2005, 2009, and 2014 were obtained from Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. No additional aerial photographs were reasonably ascertainable. The following observations were noted: 1938 and 1947 (1”=500’) The subject property and adjacent properties to the northwest, west, southwest, and south appeared to be used for agricultural purposes. Some development was noted to the north, northeast, east, and southeast in the 1938 photograph and additional development was observed in these areas in the 1947 photograph. A roadway was evident adjacent to the east, in the present-day location of Main Street. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 7 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1963 (1”=500’) A building similar in appearance and location as the existing building located on the subject property was first observed. Significant commercial development was noted to the south, east, and north. Significant residential development was observed to the west, northwest, and further east, northeast, and southeast. A roadway was evident adjacent to the north, in the present-day location of Almond Avenue. 1972 (1”=500”), 1975 (1’=800”), 1980 (1’=500”), 1985 (1’=800”), and 1995 (1”=500’) The subject property and surrounding properties generally appeared the same from the previous photograph. Details in the 1975 photograph were unclear due to the poor quality of the photograph. Some additional commercial development was evident to the south, east, southeast, northeast, and north. 2002, 2005, 2009, and 2014 (1”=500’) The subject property and surrounding properties generally appeared throughout this time period as they do today. Copies of portions of the reviewed aerial photographs are enclosed within Appendix E. 8.2. City Directories The 1930, 1936, and 1941 editions of the Western Directory Co. Directory of Orange County, California, the 1951 edition of the Directory Service Co. Directory of Southern Orange County, California, the 1956, 1963, and 1967 editions of the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. Directory of Orange County, California, the 1971, 1976, 1981, and 1986 editions of Haines Orange County Directory, and the 1991, 1996, 2002, 2006, and 2011 editions of Haines North Orange County Directory were obtained from Historical Information Gatherers Inc. No other directories were reasonably ascertainable. The following is a summary of listings for the subject property and surrounding properties: Address Occupant Year(s) Listed 202 South Main Street (Subject Property) Not Listed Iron Horse Restaurant La Brasserie J Vielliemaringe, La Brasserie La Brasserie Manhattan Supper Club 1930-1956 1963-1976 1981-1996 2002 2006 2011 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 8 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Address Occupant Year(s) Listed 146 South Main Street (north of subject property) Not Listed R Baxter, Delbert Eibey Geraldine Ingraham Not Listed -Supercuts, Remedy Personnel Service, Post Masters, Orange Town & Court, One Hour Photo, Intelligent Temporary, Flores Hacienda FD, Gigi’s, CVS Pharmacy -Yes Cleaners, The Good Guys, Supercuts, Sav-On Express Pharmacy, Remedy Personnel Services, One Hour Photo, Patrick Le Jr. DMD, Flores Hacienda FD, The Good Guys, Gigi’s Nails -Szeles Investigations, Supercuts, Remedy Intelligent Staffing, One Hour Photo, Patrick Le Jr. DMD, Flores Hacienda FD, Good Guys, Copy Club Center 29, Ann’s Nails, Alterations Pro -T-Mobile, Supercuts, Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Pro Alterations, Pho Hao, One Hour Photo, Patrick Le Jr. DMD, Flores Hacienda FD, Good Guys Orange, Ann’s Nails -D Yinger, T-Mobile, Szeles Investigations, Supercuts, Greg Smith, Jessica Ruiz, Pho Hao, One Hour Photo, Jeffrey Mattson, Cristina Marquez, Charles Manik, Amberey Logan, Patrick Le DMD, Julia Laurico, Tanya Johnson, Karen Ibe, Debbie Haxton, Flores Hacienda FD, Green’s Lock & Safe Company, H&R Block, Good Guys, Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market, Kenneth Davis Best California Financial, Debbie Berlinhaxton, Ann’s Nails 1930-1941 1951 1956 1963-1986 1991 1996 2002 2006 2011 167 South Main Street (northeast of subject property) F A Showalter (lunches) Vacant Kincaid’s Coffee Shop Not Listed Maria’s Pizza Room Not Listed The Chili Pepper 1930 1936-1941 1951 1956 1963 1967 1971-2011 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 9 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Address Occupant Year(s) Listed 170 South Main Street (adjacent to the north) Not Listed -Rick Ulivi, Ulivi Financial Research, David Tice CPA, James Smith, John Muller, Lank & Hanna, Kimberly Nurses, Integrated Research, Stanley Gardner CPA, Campbell Widmann, CA City Bank, Lee Bryant CPA, Royce Brezeale CPA -David Tice CPA, Nord & De La Flor Attorney, Multilines Investigation, Stanley Gardner CPA, Commerce Bank, Royce Brezeale CPA -David Tice CPA, Huff & Marshall CPA, Nord & De La Flor Attorney, Stanley Gardner CPA, Michael Fujimoto CPA, Employers Resource, R Brezeale -Law Office of Britt Zoolalian, Tice Gardner Fujimoto & Whyte, Prescott Company, Nord & De La Flor Attorneys, Wayne McClaskey Attorney, Stanley Gardner, Michael Fujimoto CPA, Employers Resource, Allan Calomino Attorney, Bank of Orange County, Attorney at Lab B Zoolalian -SMC Concern Inc., Orange County Funding Com, Patrick O’Kennedy Law Office, Nord & De La Flor Attorneys, New Century Title, Wayne McClaskey Attorney, Main Street Mortgage, Joseph B Downs Law Office, Bank of Orange -Orange Co. Funding Com, Patrick O’Kennedy Attorney, Inhouse Solutions, Hole in One Mortgage, Joseph Downs Law Office 1930-1981 1986 1991 1996 2002 2006 2011 185 South Main Street (northeast of subject property) Not Listed Williams Manufacturing Company (Wood Novelties) Kleen Line Corp. Chemical Paddock of California Not Listed Charles Miles, Artistic Blacksmithing Not Listed 1930-1936 1941 1951 1956 1963-1996 2002 2006-2011 187 South Main Street (northeast of subject property) Not Listed Ray McCoy Motor Co. Orange Volkswagen Repair Orange Independent Auto Repair Philip Nguyen, Orange Independent Auto Repair 1930-1956 1963 1967-1971 1976-2006 2011 193 South Main Street (adjacent to the northeast) Not Listed W C Schultz Poultry Orana Poultry Co. Not Listed Dyno Power The Tune Up Center The Tune Up Center, Smog Check Station Karl Krehahn The Tune Up Center Main Auto Care 1930 1936 1941-1956 1963-1971 1976 1981-1986 1991-1996 2002 2006 2011 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 10 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Address Occupant Year(s) Listed 211 South Main Street (adjacent to the southeast) Not Listed Roseburrough Tool Not Listed Genetic Center 1930-1941 1951-1991 1996 2002-2011 230 South Main Street (adjacent to the south) Not Listed Bill Corwin Ford Earnest Ford Sales & Service Roger Miller Ford, Ford Authorized Sales & Service Ford of Orange Not Listed -Unilab Quest Diagnostics, Holly Sata MD, Jose Roque MD, Radnet Management, Orange Advance Imaging Center, Jessica Hung MD, The Breast Care Center -Justin West MD, The Shop on Main, Holly Sata MD, Radnet Management, Quest Diagnostic, Orange Advanced Imaging Center, James Link MD, Jessica Hung MD, Knott Wellness, BCC 1930-1956 1963-1981 1986 1991 1996 2002 2006 2011 245 South Main Street (southeast of subject property) Venners & Watters Peerless Cleaners BJ Livesey (cleaner), DE Crowley (cleaner) Maddox Cleaners Not Listed 1930 1936 1941 1951-1971 1976-2011 273 South Main Street (southeast of subject property) Peerless Concrete Pipe Co. Serve Own Self Laundry, Sharpen Shop Orange Coast District Inc. Kens Liquor Store CET Autopia Access Not Listed Main Furnishing Joseph Vallejo, Nellie’s Exercise Equipment Nellie’s Exercise Equipment Fitness Fix, Buena Vista Furniture 1930-1941 1951 1956 1963-1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2002 2006 2011 280 South Main Street (south of subject property) Not Listed -David Smith MD, Michael Shepard MD, Benjamin Rubin MD, Pablo Prietto MD, Orthopedic Specialty Institute, Main Street Specialty Surgery, Mark Halikis, Robert Gorab MD, Scott Fischer MD, Jeffrey Deckey MD, Jack Chen Orthopedics, Gregory Carlson MD, Lawrence Barnett MD -David Smith Orthopedic, Michael Shepard MD, Miguel Prietto MD, Carlos Prietto MD, Orthopedic Specialty Institute, Main Street Specialty Surgery, Scott Fischer, Jack Chen Orthopedics, Michael Danto Orthopedics, Lawrence Barnett MD 1930-2002 2006 2011 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 11 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Address Occupant Year(s) Listed 1510 West Almond Avenue (adjacent to the west) Not Listed US Government US Post Office Almond Private School Page School Orange Page Summer Camps, Page School Orange New Horizons Development Love & Care Child Center J Vieillemarin, Chez Grand Mere Preschool Chez Grand Mere Preschool 1930-1956 1963-1967 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2002 2006-2011 8.3. Fire Insurance Maps The subject property was not within the coverage area of the fire insurance maps maintained for study at the City of Los Angeles Library’s digital Sanborn® collection. 8.4. Chain-of-Title/Environmental Lien We used ERIS to prepare a recorded land title record (Chain-of-Title) and Environmental Lien Search. The subject property has been owned by the following: John Q. McKinnon, Sr. & Mary Marie McKinnon, H/W ; James A. Freeman & Jo Emily Freeman, H/W; James A. Freeman & Jo Emily Freeman, H/W ; Wycliffe Bible Translators, Inc.; Van-Nguyen, Inc.; Richard B. Settle & Bonnie L. Settle, H/W; Paul Rossi and Roswitha G. Rossi, his wife (50% interest) and Joseph Vieillemaringe & Olga B. Vieillemaringe, H/W (50%); Paul Rossi and Roswitha G. Rossi, his wife; Paul Pierre Rossi and Roswitha Heide Gertrud Rossi, Trustees of the P&R Rossi Family Trust; Joseph J. Vieillemaringe & Olga B. Vieillemaringe, H/W; Joseph J. Vieillemaringe and Olga B. Vieillemaringe, Co- Trustees and Successor Trustees of the Vieillemaringe Family Trust; Roswitha Heide Gertrud Rossi, Trustee and Successor Trustee of the P&R Rossi Family Trust; Roswitha Heide Gertrud Rossi, Trustee of the Roswitha Rossi Trust; Roswitha Heide Gertrud Rossi, Trustee of the Roswitha Rossi Trust, DTD 9/3/2010 and Olga B. Vieillemaringe, Trustee and Successor Trustee of the Vieillemaringe Family Trust, DTD 2/1/2001; and 202 S. Main St., LLC. The current owner, 202 S. Main St. LLC, acquired the property in 2012. There were no environmental liens or activity or use limitations on record. A copy of the chain-of-title and environmental lien search is included in Appendix F. 9. PHYSICAL SETTING INFORMATION 9.1. USGS Topographic Map The USGS Orange, California, 7.5 minute series (topographic) map (1964, photo revised 1981) was reviewed. The subject property and all adjacent properties appeared to be developed in the 1964 illustration. Main Street and Almond Avenue were depicted adjacent to the east and north, respectively. A portion of the USGS Orange, California, 7.5 minute series (topographic) map is provided as the previously referenced Figure 1. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 12 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 9.2. Geologic Conditions 9.2.1. Soil Type and Permeability According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service online Soil Survey of Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California, the type of soil found on the subject property was San Emigdio fine sandy loam. San Emigdio soils were formed in alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. They are well drained and have a high capacity to transmit water. 9.2.2. Regional Geology According to the California Department of Conservation - California Geological Survey, Geologic Map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30 X 60 Quadrangles, California (2006), the subject property is located in an area of young alluvial fan deposits. 9.2.3. Groundwater Flow Direction According to information reviewed on Geotracker for the Roger Miller Ford site located approximately 115 feet south of the subject property, groundwater flow direction is towards the southwest in the area of the subject property. 10. ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW 10.1. Local Sources 10.1.1. Building Permit/Inspection Department Building records for the subject property were requested from the City of Orange – Building Department. The following records were provided: 07/13/1959 Building permit for new 4600 sq. ft. restaurant 11/24/1959 Sign permit for Iron Horse Restaurant 12/02/1959 Building permit to add storage room to restaurant 10/29/1964 Electrical permit for Iron Horse Restaurant 05/25/1965 Sign permit for Iron Horse Restaurant 09/19/1965 Plumbing permit for Iron Horse Restaurant 02/07/1967 Building permit to move partition, cut in new door, and change south side roof for Iron Horse Restaurant 12/04/1975 Sign permit for 5’x10’ sign Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 13 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 09/10/1976 Electrical permit for Open House Restaurant 01/04/1979 Electrical permit for La Brasserie 05/12/1983 Building permit to add 59’x12’ addition to La Brasserie 06/29/1995 Building permit to reroof building 03/12/2008 Install new fire suppression system 05/14/2011 Relocate sign for “Manhattan Supper Club” due to street widening 10.1.2. Fire Department A request for information regarding the subject property has been submitted to the City of Orange Fire Department. To date, we have not received a response. Should any pertinent information become available from this source at a later date, an addendum to this report will be prepared. 10.1.3. Planning/Zoning Department According to the information provided by the City of Orange Planning Department, the subject property is zoned neighborhood mixed use (NMU-24). 10.1.4. Department of Health /Pollution Control /Water Quality A request for information regarding the subject property has been submitted to the Orange County Environmental Health Department. In addition, we used Geotracker (an online database system of The California State Water Resources Control Board) to search for environmental information for the subject property and adjacent properties. No records of USTs, hazardous waste, spills, or cleanups were on file from the Health Department for the subject property. However, the following Geotracker records were found for several surrounding properties: Roger Miller Ford – 230 South Main Street (115 feet south) A Case Closure Summary Report dated October 5, 1998, prepared by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and a Case Summary Report prepared by the California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) were reviewed. According to these reports, the site formerly had two underground storage tanks (USTs) located on the property. Depth to groundwater is between 90 and 94 feet below ground surface (bgs) with a flow direction towards the southwest. One 2,000 gallon gasoline UST and one 500 gallon waste oil UST were removed from the site in 1991. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) were detected in the soil samples collected during UST removal. TPH-g concentrations from soil samples collected beneath the removed tanks ranged from 34,000 parts per million (ppm) at 10 feet bgs to less than 26 ppm at 65 feet bgs. Benzene ranged from non-detect to 0.12 ppm; toluene ranged from non- Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 14 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. detect to 290 ppm; ethylbenzene from non-detect to 0.13 ppm; and total xylenes ranged from non-detect to 0.99 ppm. A maximum concentration of 10,000 ppb TPH-g was detected in groundwater. In September 1995, a soil vapor extraction system and five vadose zone wells were installed to monitor groundwater quality. The highest methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) concentration reported in groundwater was 100 parts per billion (ppb). Continuous monitoring following vapor extraction was required to confirm a decline in impacts. A maximum concentration of 1,350 ppb TPH-g in groundwater was reported in 1997. The concentration of TPH-g in soil had decreased from 34,000 ppm to 3,900 ppm. The analyses of the samples collected showed a continued decline of gasoline impacts to near non-detect. A no further action letter was issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on April 14, 1998, and the case attained closure on October 5, 1998. Based on the continued decrease in impacts and the case closure, the soil and groundwater impacts associated with the Roger Miller Ford site do not appear to impact the subject property. Tune Up Center – 193 South Main Street (220 feet east-northeast) An Underground Tank Case Closure Letter dated January 25, 1999, prepared by the City of Orange Fire Prevention Bureau, and a Case Summary Report prepared by the CSWRCB were reviewed. A UST was removed from the site on October 5, 1998, and a release of a solvent/non-petroleum hydrocarbon was discovered. Little additional information was provided other than that the release affected soil. The case attained closure on January 25, 1999. Based on the distance and case closure, the potential soil and groundwater impacts associated with the Tune-Up Center site do not appear to impact the subject property. Former Roseburrough Site – 211 S. Main Street (230 feet east-southeast) A Case Summary Report prepared by the CSWRCB was reviewed. According to this report, a release of diesel was reported at the site on August 3, 2000. The release was stopped by closing and removing the leaking tank. Little additional information was provided other than that the case attained closure on January 19, 2001. Based on the distance and case closure, the potential soil and groundwater impacts associated with the site do not appear to impact the subject property. Supporting environmental documents are enclosed in Appendix G. 10.1.5. Tax Assessor's/Appraisal/Auditor Department According to information provided by the Orange County Assessor, the subject property is located on Parcel No. 390-264-28. No additional information was provided. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 15 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 10.1.6. OTHER According to a search of the California Division of Oil and Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) website, no oil or gas wells are located within 1.0 mile of the subject property. A search was made of the Department of Toxic Substances Control ENVIROSTOR online database. The subject property was not included on this list. 10.2. State Sources We used ERIS to identify state sites of known environmental concern. A copy of the ERIS Database Search Report, queried on November 2, 2016 is enclosed within Appendix H. Some terms utilized in the ERIS report may differ from actual state identification listings. The following is a summary of information provided. 10.2.1. State/Tribal NPL Sites The California National Priorities List (NPL) was reviewed. The subject property is not included on this listing. In addition, no State NPL sites reported within 1.0 mile of the subject property. 10.2.2. State/Tribal CERCLIS Sites The Envirostor- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) database was reviewed. The subject property is not included on this list. However, the following State CERCLIS sites are reported within 1.0 mile of the subject property: Facility Name/Address Location Status Running Springs Elementary 8670 Running Springs Drive *0.19 mile north No action required, 2000 AMF Voit Inc. 426 W. Almond Avenue 0.61 mile east Unknown AMF Voit Inc. 426 W. Almond Avenue 0.61 mile east Completed, 2008 AMF Newport Divers 426 West Almond Avenue 0.61 mile east Refer: Other agency, 1988 Statek Corp. 512 N. Main Street 0.68 mile north Inactive – Needs evaluation Data Circuits Inc. 1607 W. Orange Grove Avenue 0.71 mile north Unknown Stevens Metal Finishing 1607 W. Orange Grove Avenue 0.71 mile north No further action, 2002 Data Circuits Inc. 1607 W. Orange Grove Avenue 0.71 mile north Refer: RCRA, 1995 Data Circuits Inc. 1607 W. Orange Grove Avenue 0.71 mile north Active, 2012 Independent Forge Co. 692 N. Batavia Street 0.96 mile north- northeast Inactive – Needs evaluation *Actual location is over 9 miles northeast 10.2.3. State/Tribal Solid Waste Landfill The California Integrated Waste Management Board Solid Waste Information System database (SWL) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. In addition, no SWL sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 16 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 10.2.4. State/Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks The listing of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) and the spills, leaks, and investigation and cleanup cost recovery (SLIC) databases were reviewed. The subject property is not included on these lists. However, the following LUST and SLIC sites are reported within 0.25 mile of the subject property: Facility Name/Address Location Status Roger Miller Ford 230 S. Main Street 115 feet south Closed, 1998 Tune Up Center 193 S. Main Street 220 feet east- northeast Closed, 1999 Former Roseburrough Site 211 S. Main Street 230 feet east- southeast Closed, 2001 Don Clark Auto 305 S. Main Street 0.14 mile south Closed, 1992 Chevron #9-3098 1409 W. Chapman Avenue 0.16 mile north Closed, 1994 Orange Coast Car Wash 1405 Chapman Avenue 0.16 mile north- northeast Open – Verification Monitoring, 2007 Far West Towing 1138 W. Chapman Avenue 0.18 mile northeast Closed, 1992 ERIS reported additional LUST sites between 0.25 and 0.5 mile of the subject property. Additional information regarding these sites can be found in Appendix H. 10.2.5. State/Tribal Storage Tanks The California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) State Registered Underground Storage Tanks Database, the Certified Unified Program Agency databases of underground storage tanks, and the Indian Lands Underground Storage Tanks List, as maintained by the USEPA Region 9 (REG UST/AST), were reviewed. The subject property is not included within these listings. In addition, no adjoining properties are included on the REG UST/AST lists. 10.2.6. State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites The Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites (VCP) database was reviewed. The subject property is not included on this list. In addition, no VCP sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 10.2.7. State/Tribal Brownfield Sites The US Brownfield database was reviewed. The subject property is not included on this list. In addition, no Brownfield sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 10.2.8. Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites The Waste Management Unit Database System (WMUDS) and Soil and Waste Assessment (SWAT) databases were reviewed. The subject property is not included within these listings. In addition, no WMUDS or SWAT sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 17 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 10.2.9. Local Lists of Hazardous Waste/Contaminated Sites The School (SCH) database was reviewed. The subject property is not included on this list. However, the following SCH site is reported within 0.25 mile of the subject property: Facility Name/Address Location Status Running Springs Elementary 8670 Running Springs Drive *0.19 mile north No action required, 2000 *Actual location is over 9 miles northeast 10.2.10. Other Tanks The California Facility Inventory Database (FID) and the Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS UST) databases were reviewed. The subject property is not included on these databases. In addition, no SWEEPS UST sites are reported adjacent to the subject property. 10.2.11. Local Land Records The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions and Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed/Land Use Restriction (DEED) was reviewed. The subject property is not included on this database. In addition, no DEED sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 10.2.12. OTHER The OTHER database was reviewed. The subject property is not included in this database. However, the following Department of Toxic Substance Control Drycleaner (DRYCLEANER) sites are reported within 0.25 mile of the subject property: Facility Name/Address Location Status PJ Castle Inc. 1437 W. Chapman Avenue 0.14 mile north Created 1987, Inactive 2005 Orange Cleaners 1437 W. Chapman Avenue 0.14 mile north Created 2005, Active Crystal Clear Cleaners 358 S. Main Street 0.20 mile south Created 2005, Inactive 2014 VIP Cleaners 1714 W. Chapman Avenue 0.22 mile northwest Created 1997, Inactive 2002 VIP Cleaners 1714 W. Chapman Avenue 0.22 mile northwest Created 2003, Inactive 2014 VIP Cleaners 1714 W. Chapman Avenue 0.22 mile northwest Created 1991, Inactive 2003 10.3. Federal Sources We used ERIS to identify federal sites of known environmental concern. A copy of the ERIS Database Search Report, queried on November 2, 2016 is enclosed within Appendix H. The following is a summary of information provided. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 18 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 10.3.1. Federal NPL The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Priorities List (NPL) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. In addition, no NPL sites are reported within 1.0 mile of the subject property. 10.3.2. Federal Delisted NPL The USEPA Delisted NPL was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. In addition, no Delisted NPL sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 10.3.3. Federal CERCLIS The USEPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. In addition, no CERCLIS sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 10.3.4. Federal CERCLIS NFRAP The USEPA CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. In addition, no CERCLIS NFRAP sites are reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 10.3.5. Federal RCRA TSD The USEPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRA) Treatment, Storage and/or Disposal Facilities (RCRA TSD) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. In addition, no RCRA TSD sites were reported within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 10.3.6. Federal RCRA COR The USEPA RCRA Corrective Action Sites (RCRA COR) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. However, the following RCRA COR sites were reported within 1.0 mile of the subject property: Facility Name/Address Location Status AMF Voit Inc. 426 W. Almond Avenue 0.61 mile east Small quantity generator; no violations or enforcement actions on file Data Circuits Inc. 1607 W. Orange Grove Avenue 0.71 mile north Small quantity generator; five violations/enforcement actions on file 10.3.7. Federal RCRA GEN The USEPA RCRA – Large and Small Quantity Generators (RCRA GEN) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. However, the following RCRA GEN site is located adjacent to the subject property: Facility Name/Address Location Status David Wilsons Ford of Orange 230 S. Main Street Adjacent to the south Small quantity generator; no violations or enforcement actions on file Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 19 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 10.3.8. Federal ERNS The USEPA Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. 10.3.9. Federal IC and EC Brownfield Management System The USEPA Brownfield Management System (BMS) of sites with IC and EC was reviewed. The subject property is not included within this listing. 11. VAPOR ENCROACHMENT SCREENING Giles conducted a limited Tier 1 and Tier 2 Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) at the subject property in an attempt to identify a vapor encroachment condition (VEC). While Giles used the ASTM Standard E 2600-15, Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, published December 2015, as a general guideline, this limited VES is not intended to constitute a full Tier 1 or Tier 2 VES as described in the ASTM E 2600-15 standard. A VEC is defined as the presence or likely presence of chemical(s) of concern (COC) vapors in the subsurface of the subject property, caused by the release of vapors from contaminated soil or groundwater either on or in the vicinity of the subject property. The current and former uses of the subject property do not present a vapor encroachment condition. The former Roger Miller Ford site was located approximately 115 feet south and inferred to be hydraulically down gradient of the subject property. This property formerly had two USTs – one gasoline UST and one waste oil UST. Some soil and groundwater impacts associated with these USTs were detected; however, these impacts showed a continual decrease and the case associated with the site attained closure. In our opinion, based on the decline of impacts associated with the site and down gradient location, a vapor encroachment condition does not exist. The former Tune-Up Center site was located approximately 220 feet east-northeast and inferred to be hydraulically up gradient of the subject property. The property formerly had one UST and a release of a solvent/non-petroleum hydrocarbon was discovered after UST removal. In our opinion, based on the distance of the former Tune-Up Center from the subject property and fact that the release involved a non-petroleum hydrocarbon, a vapor encroachment condition does not exist. The former Roseburrough site was located approximately 230 feet east-southeast and inferred to be hydraulically down gradient of the subject property. A release of diesel was reported at this site but was stopped by closing and removing the leaking tank. In our opinion, based on the distance and down gradient location of the site from the subject property, a vapor encroachment condition does not exist. No other facilities that presented a potential vapor encroachment condition were identified in the area of the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 20 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 12. GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION Geotechnical borings are planned for the subject property but have not been completed at this time. 13. FINDINGS AND OPINIONS • The subject property is currently developed with a vacant restaurant building and asphalt paved parking lot. The building on the subject property was originally constructed in 1959 and has been occupied by restaurants including Iron Horse Restaurant, La Brasserie, Manhattan Supper Club, and Manhattan Steak & Seafood Restaurant. Prior to 1959, the subject property appeared to be used for agricultural purposes. The subject property is not listed on any state or federal databases. No environmental concerns were noted during the on-site visit. The current and former uses of the subject property do not constitute a recognized environmental condition. • The former Roger Miller Ford property is located approximately 115 feet south of the subject property. This property is listed on the LUST and RCRA GEN databases. The property was occupied by a Ford dealership from at least 1963 through 1996. On the RCRA GEN database, the site is listed as a small quantity generator but has no violations or enforcement actions on file. One 2,000 gallon gasoline UST and one 500 gallon waste oil UST were removed from the site in 1991. Soil and groundwater impacts were detected but after continuous monitoring following vapor extraction, gasoline impacts showed a continued decline to near non-detect. The case attained closure on October 5, 1998. Based on the decline of impacts associated with the site and the down gradient location from the subject property, a vapor encroachment condition does not exist and the site does not constitute a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. • The Tune-Up Center property is located approximately 220 feet east-northeast of the subject property. This property is listed on the LUST database. A UST was removed from the site in October 1998 and a release of solvent/non-petroleum hydrocarbon was discovered. The case attained closure on January 25, 1999. Based on the distance and the release at the property involved a non-petroleum hydrocarbon, a vapor encroachment condition does not exist and the site does not constitute a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. • The former Roseburrough property is located approximately 230 feet east- southeast of the subject property. This property is listed on the LUST database. A release of diesel was reported at the site in August 2000. The release was stopped by closing and removing the leaking tank. The case attained closure on January 19, 2001. Based on the distance and down gradient location from the subject property, a vapor encroachment condition does not exist and the site does not constitute a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 21 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. • The Running Springs Elementary School property is listed as being located approximately 0.19 mile north of the subject property but is actually located over 9 miles northeast. This property is listed on the state CERCLIS and SCH databases. The school property has no attained no action required status on both of these databases. Based on the distance and status, the Running Springs Elementary School property does not constitute a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. • The remaining surrounding properties were observed with commercial or residential uses. Historically, these areas were developed for primarily residential or commercial uses. The remaining surrounding properties are not listed on any federal or state databases. No indications of environmental concerns were noted on the remaining surrounding properties at the time of the on-site visit. As such, the remaining surrounding properties do not constitute an environmental condition to the subject property. • Nine additional state CERCLIS sites are located between 0.61 and 0.96 mile of the subject property. Two of these state CERCLIS sites are inactive, two have been referred to another agency, one has attained completed status, one has attained no further action status, two have unknown statuses, and one is active. The active state CERCLIS site is located approximately 0.71 mile north of the subject property. Based on the distance and status, the state CERCLIS sites do not present a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. • Four additional LUST sites are located between 0.14 and 0.18 mile of the subject property. Three of these LUST sites have attained closure status. The active LUST site is located approximately 0.16 mile north-northeast of the subject property. Based on the distance or status, the LUST sites do not present a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. • Six DRYCLEANER sites are located between 0.14 and 0.22 mile of the subject property. Five of these DRYCLEANER sites are inactive. The active DRYCLEANER site is located approximately 0.14 mile north of the subject property. Based on the distance or status, the DRYCLEANER sites do not present a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. • Two RCRA COR sites are located between 0.61 and 0.71 mile of the subject property. Both of these RCRA COR sites are small quantity generators but have no violations or enforcement actions on file. Based on the distance and no violation status, the RCRA COR sites do not present a recognized environmental condition with respect to the subject property. 14. CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 of the property located at 202 South Main Street, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California, the property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described within Section 3.2. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 22 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. This assessment has revealed no evidence of historic recognized environmental conditions or recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. 15. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings and conclusions of this assessment, no further environmental investigation is recommended to be performed on the subject property. 16. DATA GAPS No historical documentation was available prior to 1930. However, based on the research completed for this report, the lack of historical documentation prior to 1930 is not considered a significant data gap. 17. GENERAL COMMENTS No environmental site assessment can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. ASTM International’s Standard Practice E 1527-13 is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property, and recognizes reasonable limits of time and cost. The term recognized environmental condition means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions. The term de minimis condition means a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. The term historical recognized environmental condition means a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). The term controlled recognized environmental condition means a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 4003 Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Page 23 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). The term hazardous substance is a substance defined as hazardous pursuant to CERCLA 42 USC § 9601(14), and as interpreted by USEPA regulations and the courts. The term petroleum products is defined as those substances included within the meaning of the petroleum exclusion to CERCLA 42 USC § 9601(14), as interpreted by the courts and USEPA, that is: petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under Subparagraphs (A) through (F) of CERCLA 42 USC § 9601(14), natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, and synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas). The services described in this report were performed consistent with generally accepted professional consulting principles and practices and in accordance with the practices and service scope elements recommended by ASTM International for a Phase I ESA. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. These services were performed consistent with our agreement with our client. This report is solely for the use and information of our client or as otherwise noted. Any unauthorized use of this report is strictly prohibited and we assume no liability for any such use. We prepared this report to aid in the evaluation of recognized environmental conditions of the subject property located at 202 South Main Street, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California. Conclusions presented in the report are based on available information that pertained to the subject property at various points in time. The information may have been provided to us by others or acquired through discussions with various governmental or agency personnel. We must rely on the credibility of others and do not independently verify or warrant the accuracy of information or test results they supply. Any alteration in the documentation, facts, or verbal information we obtained may result in a modification or redirection of the conclusions presented in this report. Conclusions in this report are based on visual field observations performed within the property boundaries and our record review at a specific point in time. Environmental conditions may exist at the subject property that could not be identified by visual observation, including potential hazardous substances present within undocumented fills on the subject or adjoining properties. Where subsurface work and/or laboratory testing was performed, our professional opinions are based in part on the interpretation of data obtained from discreet sampling locations. The sampling may not have depicted actual environmental conditions at non-sampled locations elsewhere on the subject or adjoining properties. We are not responsible for any errors in the professional opinions presented within this report that result from subsequently occurring events or inaccuracies due to sampling or services provided by subcontracted testing laboratories. © Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 2016 APPENDIX A Important Information About Your Geoenvironmental Report APPENDIX B Resumes Monica Sell, E.I.T Staff Engineer I Education  B.S. Civil Engineering University of California, Irvine, 2014 Professional Registrations and Certifications  Engineer-In-Training – 2014 Qualifications Environmental Assessments - Evaluation of past and current on-site operations to identify potentially contaminated sites including historical record research and regulatory agency file review. Subsurface Investigations – Subsurface exploration experience including direct-push and hollow-stem drilling. Soil gas, soil, and groundwater sampling/analysis. Projects involving preparation of work plans, installation of soil borings, sample collection methods, mapping of sites, evaluation of subsurface contaminants in accordance with regulatory requirements, and preparation of reports. Industrial Hygiene – Oversight of inspections and abatement for asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint, as well as microbial sampling/analysis. Health and Safety - Recognition and assessment of potential chemical and physical hazards and associated risks in field operations and selection of appropriate personal protective equipment. Project Management – Preparation of proposals, project budgets, scheduling, coordination/interfacing with regulatory agencies, supervision/oversight of contractors (drilling crews, equipment operators), analytical report writing, and presentations. Timothy J. Taugher, P.G. Senior Hydrogeologist Education  M.S. Geology, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 1991  B.S. Geography, Carroll College – Waukesha, Wisconsin, 1989 Professional Registration and Certification  Registered Professional Geologist – Wisconsin  Wisconsin Dept. of Safety and Professional Services – Registered PECFA Consultant  Wisconsin Dept. of Health Services – Licensed Asbestos Inspector and Management Planner  Ohio Dept. of Health – Licensed Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist  Illinois Dept. of Public Health – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  Indiana Dept. of Environmental Management – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  Iowa Dept. of Labor – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  Michigan Dept. of Public Health – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  Iowa Dept. of Labor – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  North Carolina Health Hazard Management Program – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  Texas Dept. of State Health Services – Licensed Asbestos Individual Management Planner  Pennsylvania Dept. of Labor & Industry – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  Virginia Dept. of Professional & Occupational Regulation – Licensed Asbestos Inspector  40-Hour OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations Emergency Response Certificate  ASTM Property Condition Assessments Training Experience Mr. Taugher has more than 20 years experience conducting research on the history of properties, Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Property Condition Assessments (PCAs), asbestos inspections, lead- based paint surveys, radon presence surveys, Underground Storage Tank (UST) investigations, feasibility studies, and remediation projects. His project experience includes: Environmental Assessments  Conducted more than 1,900 industrial, commercial, and residential Phase I ESAS in 44 states.  Conducted more than 400 asbestos inspections for building renovation and demolition.  Prepared asbestos management plans for apartment complexes and office buildings.  Conducted radon surveys at apartment complexes, dwellings, and assisted living facilities. Property Condition Assessments  Completed numerous PCAs on facilities including large industrial buildings, office buildings, shopping centers, day care centers, restaurants, and oil change facilities. Investigation and Remediation Services  Project manager for subsurface investigations and site characterization of two former solid waste disposal landfills impacted with RCRA metals and petroleum hydrocarbons.  Project hydrogeologist responsible for evaluation of data and design of remedial technologies at numerous sites. Remedial methods included active and passive soil vapor extraction (SVE), soil excavation and disposal, soil aeration by means of thinspreading, and in-situ bioremediation.  Responsible for preparation and peer review of more than 250 claims for reimbursement of funds used to investigate and remediate petroleum-contaminated sites under Wisconsin’s Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund Act (PECFA). Reimbursements total more than $16 million. Compliance Services  Conducted compliance audits at numerous oil change facilities in several states. Recommended upgrade design for USTs and ASTs. Completed or corrected state registration of USTs and ASTs.  Conducted an environmental compliance audit of a large camp/retreat facility, including recommendations for an abandoned landfill; USTs and ASTs; and spill prevention, control, and countermeasures (SPCC) program. APPENDIX C User Questionnaire ASTM E 1527-13 USER QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 2 1 In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2002 (Brownfields Amendments), the user must conduct the following inquiries required by 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30 and 312.31. These inquiries must also be conducted by EPA Brownfield Assessment and Characterization grantees. The user should provide the following information to the environmental professional. Failure to conduct these inquiries could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiries” is not complete. Site Name and Address Main & Almond FSU (#04003) 202 S. Main Street Orange, CA 92868 APN: 390-264-28 Site Owner 202 S. Main Street LLC Site Owner / Representative Contact Info Owner’s broker: ANR Asset Management Brokerage | Julie Vieillemaringe 8740 S. Sepulveda Blvd #100 Los Angeles, CA 90045 T: 310.410.9388 | C: 310.628.8198 | F: 310.410.052 Person/Entity Completing Form Brent Ryhlick Senior Real Estate Manager Chick-fil-A, Inc. 15635 Alton Pkwy, Ste 350 Irvine, CA 92618 The person completing the Phase I Questionnaire is not an environmental professional and does not have environmental expertise. Date Completed August 26, 2016 Signature 1) Did a search of records land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state, or local law (40 CFR 312.25)? _X__No ___Yes If yes, please explain. Chick-fil-A has not conducted a search of the land title records for environmental liens and requests the environmental consultant to include the search as part of the services provided. 2) Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any activity and use limitations (AULs), such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional ASTM E 1527-13 USER QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 2 2 controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state, or local law (40 CFR 312.26)? _X__No ___Yes If yes, please explain. Chick-fil-A has not conducted a search of the land title records for AULS and requests the environmental consultant to include the search as part of the services provided. 3) Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business (40 CFR 312-28)? X No ___Yes If yes, please explain. 4) Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property (40 CFR 312.29)? ___No X Yes If no, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because environmental impacts are known or believed to be present at the property (40 CFR 312.29)? ___No ___Yes If yes, please explain. 5) Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the site that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases (40 CFR 312.30)? For example, (a) Do you know the past uses of the property? No __X_Yes (b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present on the property? X No ___Yes (c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? X No ___Yes (d) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? X No ___Yes If yes to any of the above, please explain. (a) Currently operating as steak and seafood restaurant. 6) Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of environmental impacts at the property (40 CFR 312.31)? X No ___Yes If yes, please explain. 7) Reason for Performing the Phase I ESA. To determine if the site is suitable for the construction of a Chick-fil-A. APPENDIX D Photographs View of the building on the subject property, facing northeast. View along the northern property boundary, facing west. PHOTOGRAPHS November 10, 2016 Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 View along the western property boundary, facing south. View along the southern property boundary, facing west. PHOTOGRAPHS November 10, 2016 Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 View along the eastern property boundary, facing north. View of the pole mounted transformers located along the northern property boundary. PHOTOGRAPHS November 10, 2016 Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 View of the businesses adjacent to the south. View of the school adjacent to the west. PHOTOGRAPHS November 10, 2016 Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 View of the businesses adjacent to the north, across Almond Avenue. View of the residential properties adjacent to the northwest, across Almond Avenue. PHOTOGRAPHS November 10, 2016 Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 View of the businesses adjacent to the northeast, across the intersection of Main Street and Almond Avenue. View of the businesses adjacent to the east, across Main Street. PHOTOGRAPHS November 10, 2016 Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 View of the businesses to the southeast, across Main Street. PHOTOGRAPHS November 10, 2016 Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 APPENDIX E Aerial Photographs Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 1938 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 1947 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 1963 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 1972 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 800’ 1975 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 1980 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 800’ 1985 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 1995 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 2002 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 2005 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 2009 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property Source: Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. Scale: 1” = 500’ 2014 Aerial Photograph Proposed Chick-fil-A No. 4003 Main & Almond FSU 202 South Main Street Orange, California Project No. 2E-1610014 Subject Property APPENDIX F Chain-of-Title and Environmental Lien Search THE ERIS HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT 79-31613-47 CFA Orange 202 S MAIN ST ORANGE, CA 92868 ERIS Project No. 20161031177 11/03/2016 ERIS – Environmental Risk Information Services hereby submits the following ASTM historical chain-of-title to the land described below. Title to the estate or interest covered by this report appears to be vested in: 202 S. MAIN ST., LLC The following is the current property legal description (See deed for full legal description): SEE ATTACHED DEED Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 390-264-28 THE ERIS HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT 1. HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE Records were searched at the ORANGE County Assessor's office and the ORANGE County Clerk's office back to 1956. The following conveyances were found of record. 1. DEED TYPE: GRANT DEED DEED DATE: 09/30/2012 RECORDED: 12/07/2012 GRANTOR: ROSWITHA HEIDE GERTRUD ROSSI, TRUSTEE OF THE ROSWITHA ROSSI TRUST, DTD 9/3/2010 AND OLGA B. VIEILLEMARINGE, TRUSTEE AND SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VIEILLEMARINGE FAMINLY TRUST, DTD 2/1/2001 GRANTEE: 202 S. MAIN ST., LLC INSTRUMENT: 20120000756324 NOTES: RECORDED TO CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN 2012000361044, RECORDED 06/26/2012. 2. DEED TYPE: GRANT DEED DEED DATE: 06/12/1956 RECORDED: 08/07/1956 GRANTOR: JOHN Q. McKINNON, SR. & MARY MARIE McKINNON, H/W GRANTEE: JAMES A. FREEMAN & JO EMILY FREEMAN, H/W INSTRUMENT: 3603-80 NOTES: 3. DEED TYPE: GRANT DEED DEED DATE: 01/31/1966 RECORDED: 02/01/1966 GRANTOR: JAMES A. FREEMAN & VIOLA M. FREEMAN GRANTEE: WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS, INC. INSTRUMENT: 8167-150 NOTES: ESTATE OF JO EMILY FREEMAN TRANSFERRED 50% INTEREST TO JAMES A. FREEMAN IN ORDER 4374-73, 08/06/1958 THE ERIS HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT 4. DEED TYPE: CORPORATION GRANT DEED DEED DATE: 10/08/1975 RECORDED: 11/25/1975 GRANTOR: WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS, INC. GRANTEE: VAN - NGUYEN, INC. INSTRUMENT: 11578-0368 NOTES: 5. DEED TYPE: CORPORATION GRANT DEED DEED DATE: 05/19/1976 RECORDED: 08/06/1976 GRANTOR: VAN - NGUYEN, INC. GRANTEE: RICHARD B. SETTLE & BONNIE L. SETTLE, H/W INSTRUMENT: 11841-1549 NOTES: 6. DEED TYPE: GRANT DEED DEED DATE: 09/14/1978 RECORDED: 09/20/1978 GRANTOR: RICHARD B. SETTLE & BONNIE L. SETTLE, H/W GRANTEE: PAUL ROSSI AND ROSWITHA G. ROSSI, HIS WIFE (50% INTEREST) AND JOSEPH VIEILLEMARINGE & OLGA B. VIEILLEMARINGE, H/W (50%) INSTRUMENT: 12848-401 NOTES: 7. DEED TYPE: QUIT CLAIM DEED DEED DATE: 02/12/1987 RECORDED: 02/18/1987 GRANTOR: PAUL ROSSI AND ROSWITHA G. ROSSI, HIS WIFE GRANTEE: PAUL PIERRE ROSSI AND ROSWITHA HEIDE GERTRUD ROSSI, TRUSTEES OF THE P.&R. ROSSI FAMILY TRUST INSTRUMENT: 19870088760 NOTES: THE ERIS HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT 8. DEED TYPE: QUIT CLAIM DEED DEED DATE: 02/01/2001 RECORDED: 02/02/2001 GRANTOR: JOSEPH J. VIEILLEMARINGE & OLGA B. VIEILLEMARINGE, H/W GRANTEE: JOSEPH J. VIEILLEMARINGE & OLGA B. VIEILLEMARINGE, CO-TRUSTEES AND SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES OF THE VIEILLEMARINGE FAMILY TRUST INSTRUMENT: 20010063761 NOTES: 9. DEED TYPE: QUIT CLAIM DEED DEED DATE: 05/28/2012 RECORDED: 06/26/2012 GRANTOR: ROSWITHA HEIDE GERTRUD ROSSI, TRUSTEE AND SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE P.&R. ROSSI FAMILY TRUST GRANTEE: ROSWITHA HEIDE GERTRUD ROSSI, TRUSTEE OF THE ROSWITHA ROSSI TRUST INSTRUMENT: 2012000361043 NOTES: THE ERIS HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT 2. LEASES AND MISCELLANEOUS LESSOR: NONE IDENTIFIED LESSEE: LEASE DATE: RECORDED DATE: INSTRUMENT #: LEASE TYPE: COMMENTS: THE ERIS HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT LIMITATION This report is neither a guarantee of title, a commitment to insure, or a policy of title insurance. ERIS – Environmental Risk Information Services does not guarantee nor include any warranty of any kind whether expressed or implied, about the validity of all information included in this report since this information is retrieved as it is recorded from various agencies that make it available. The total liability is limited to the fee paid for this report. NEIL LATNEMNORIVNE SIRE EHT TROPER HCRAES TS NIAM S 202 TS NIAM S 202 86829 AC ,EGNARO .oN tcejorP SIRE 77113016102 6102/10/11 NEIL LATNEMNORIVNE TROPER eltit dnal tnerruc elbaliava fo hcraes a morf stluser sedivorp tropeR hcraeS neiL latnemnorivnE SIRE ehT dna gnireenigne sa hcus ,snoitatimil esu dna ytivitca rehto dna sneil punaelc latnemnorivne rof sdrocer .slortnoc lanoitutitsni oisseforp fo krowten A deilppus tneilc sesu ,serudecorp dehsilbatse gniwollof ,srehcraeser deniart ,lan :ot noitamrofni ytreporp ● noitpircsed lagel ro / dna noitamrofni lecrap rof hcraeS ● noitamrofni pihsrenwo rof hcraeS ● tcidsiruj ta dedrocer stnemucod eltit dnal laiciffo hcraeseR sa hcus seicnega lanoi .cte ,seciffo ’skrelc ytnuoc ,sdeed fo seirtsiger ,eciffo ’s'redrocer ● deed eht fo ypoc a sseccA ● deed eht htiw etaicossa )s(ecnarbmucne latnemnorivne rof hcraeS ● fo weiver a nopu desab )s(ecnarbmucne latnemnorivne yna fo ypoc a edivorP sdrowyek )noitpircsed dna devlovni seitrap ,eltit( )s(tnemurtsni eht ni ● deweiver stnemucod etic ro deed eht fo ypoc a edivorP ssenisuB ruoY roF uoY knahT ta SIRE tcatnoc esaelP 614-015-4025 stnemmoc ro snoitseuq yna htiw NOITATIMIL troper sihT SIRE .ecnarusni eltit fo ycilop a ro ,erusni ot tnemtimmoc a ,eltit fo eetnaraug a rehtien si – dnik yna fo ytnarraw yna edulcni ron eetnaraug ton seod secivreS noitamrofnI ksiR latnemnorivnE amrofni lla fo ytidilav eht tuoba ,deilpmi ro desserpxe rehtehw siht ecnis troper siht ni dedulcni noit si ytilibail latot ehT .elbaliava ti ekam taht seicnega suoirav morf dedrocer si ti sa deveirter si noitamrofni .troper siht rof diap eef eht ot detimil NEIL LATNEMNORIVNE TROPER a ot dednetni si tropeR hcraeS neiL latnemnorivnE SIRE ehT sneil latnemnorivne rof hcraes eht ni tsiss .sdrocer eltit dnal ni delif NOITAMROFNI YTREPORP TEGRAT SSERDDA TS NIAM S 202 86829 AC ,EGNARO ECRUOS HCRAESER REDROCER YTNUOC EGNARO YCNEGA NOITCETORP LATNEMNORIVNE AINROFILAC LATNEMNORIVNE SETATS DETINU YCNEGA NOITCETORP NOITAMROFNI DEED :tnemurtsnI fo epyT DEED TNARG :rotnarG TSURT ISSOR AHTIWSOR EHT FO EETSURT ,ISSOR DURTREG EDIEH AHTIWSOR EIV B AGLO DNA I EHT FO EETSURT ROSSECCUS DNA EETSURT ,EGNIRAMELL TSURT YLIMAF EGNIRAMELLIEIV :eetnarG NIAM S 202 CLL TS :detaD deeD 2102/03/90 :dedroceR deeD 2102/70/21 :tnemurtsnI 4236570002102 NOITPIRCSED LAGEL 6803 TCART 72 TOL 2N NOITROP :)s( rebmuN lecraP s’rossessA 093-462-82 NEIL LATNEMNORIVNE :neiL latnemnorivnE dnuoF X dnuoF toN rcseD dnuoF fI :ebi NEIL LATNEMNORIVNE TROPER )sLUA( SNOITATIMIL ESU DNA YTIVITCA REHTO :sLUA rehtO dnuoF X dnuoF toN :ebircseD dnuoF fI APPENDIX G Environmental Records 1998 Case Closure Summary Report, Roger Miller Ford, 230 South Main Street 1998 Case Summary Report, Roger Miller Ford, 230 South Main Street CSM REPORT FOR PUBLIC NOTICING PROJECT INFORMATION (DATA PULLED FROM GEOTRACKER) - MAP THIS SITE SITE NAME / ADDRESS STATUS STATUS DATE RELEASE REPORT DATE AGE OF CASE CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES ROGER MILLER FORD (Global ID: T0605901393) 230 S MAIN ST ORANGE, CA 92668 Completed - Case Closed 10/5/1998 4/29/1991 26 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)(LEAD) - CASE #: 083001866T CASEWORKER:TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM - SUPERVISOR: Ken Williams ORANGE, CITY OF CASEWORKER:KATHY DASCOMB - SUPERVISOR: NONE SPECIFIED SITE HISTORY <NO SITE HISTORY ENTERED> CLEANUP ACTION INFO NO CLEANUP ACTIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED RISK INFORMATION VIEW CASE REVIEWS CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN CURRENT LAND USE BENEFICIAL USE DISCHARGE SOURCE DATE REPORTED STOP METHOD NEARBY / IMPACTED WELLS Gasoline Other 4/29/1991 0 FREE PRODUCT OTHER CONSTITUENTS NAME OF WATER SYSTEM LAST REGULATORY ACTIVITY LAST ESI UPLOAD LAST EDF UPLOAD EXPECTED CLOSURE DATE MOST RECENT CLOSURE REQUEST 10/5/1998 CDPH WELLS WITHIN 1500 FEET OF THIS SITE NONE CALCULATED FIELDS (BASED ON LATITUDE / LONGITUDE) APN GW BASIN NAME Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-1) WATERSHED NAME Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) COUNTY Orange PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM(S) •CITY OF ORANGE - 189 SOUTH WATER STREET, ORANGE, CA 92866 •METROPOLITAN WATER DIST. OF SO. CAL. - P.O. BOX 54153, LOS ANGELES, CA 90054 MOST RECENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO GROUNDWATER DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE MOST RECENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM CONSTITUENTS IN SOIL VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO SOIL DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE MOST RECENT GEO_WELL DATA VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO GEO_WELL DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE Page 1 of 1 11/7/2016http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/csm_report?global_id=T0605901393 1999 Underground Tank Case Closure Letter, Tune Up Center, 193 South Main Street /)t; 3£Jf'J37.2 o; r CCRviiJCB:Rio-N a J CITY OF okANGE~--fG@{PJr/ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU (714) 288-2541 ·January 25, 1999 Karl Krehahn Tune Up Center 193 S. Main St. Orange, CA 92868 99.JMl27 PH3:32 I-. RE: Underground Tank Case Closure at: 19R S.. Main.St~, ilia_qge, CA Dear Sir, FAX (714) 997-3281 The Orange County Environmental Health Department and the City of Orange Fire Department has reviewed all soil sampling report results from the above referenced location. Based upon the available information provided to these agencies in the closure report, no further action related to the underground storage tank that was removed 10/05/98 is required at this time. This notice is issued pursuant to the regulation contained in Title 23, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 16, Section 2721 (e). Should the land use of this property be changed, the site may need to be further investigated. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (714) 288-2541, 8:30-9:30 a.m. and 4:00-5:00 p.m., J\fonday-Thursday. Sincerely~\ ' //; ,.L /, 1 · {·c? / ?!)'-r;. 6 j(,_,'-f'~vv ·-· Kathy :rz}; co b Hazard us Materials Specialist CC: Regional Water Quality Control Board ORANGE FIRE DEPARTMENT 174 SOUTH ORANGE STREET ORANGE, CA 92866-1591 1999 Case Summary Report, Tune Up Center, 193 South Main Street CSM REPORT FOR PUBLIC NOTICING PROJECT INFORMATION (DATA PULLED FROM GEOTRACKER) - MAP THIS SITE SITE NAME / ADDRESS STATUS STATUS DATE RELEASE REPORT DATE AGE OF CASE CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES TUNE UP CENTER (Global ID: T0605999017) 193 S MAIN ST ORANGE, CA 92868 Completed - Case Closed 1/25/1999 1/25/1999 18 ORANGE COUNTY LOP (LEAD) SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)(LEAD) - CASE #: 083003729T CASEWORKER:PATRICIA HANNON - SUPERVISOR: XINYU (Cindy) LI SITE HISTORY <NO SITE HISTORY ENTERED> CLEANUP ACTION INFO NO CLEANUP ACTIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED RISK INFORMATION VIEW CASE REVIEWS CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN CURRENT LAND USE BENEFICIAL USE DISCHARGE SOURCE DATE REPORTED STOP METHOD NEARBY / IMPACTED WELLS Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon Other 1/25/1999 0 FREE PRODUCT OTHER CONSTITUENTS NAME OF WATER SYSTEM LAST REGULATORY ACTIVITY LAST ESI UPLOAD LAST EDF UPLOAD EXPECTED CLOSURE DATE MOST RECENT CLOSURE REQUEST 1/25/1999 CDPH WELLS WITHIN 1500 FEET OF THIS SITE NONE CALCULATED FIELDS (BASED ON LATITUDE / LONGITUDE) APN GW BASIN NAME Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-1) WATERSHED NAME Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) COUNTY Orange PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM(S) •CITY OF ORANGE - 189 SOUTH WATER STREET, ORANGE, CA 92866 •METROPOLITAN WATER DIST. OF SO. CAL. - P.O. BOX 54153, LOS ANGELES, CA 90054 MOST RECENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO GROUNDWATER DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE MOST RECENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM CONSTITUENTS IN SOIL VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO SOIL DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE MOST RECENT GEO_WELL DATA VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO GEO_WELL DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE Page 1 of 1 11/7/2016http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/csm_report?global_id=T0605999017 2000 Case Summary Report, Former Roseburrough Site, 211 South Main Street CSM REPORT FOR PUBLIC NOTICING PROJECT INFORMATION (DATA PULLED FROM GEOTRACKER) - MAP THIS SITE SITE NAME / ADDRESS STATUS STATUS DATE RELEASE REPORT DATE AGE OF CASE CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES FORMER ROSEBURROUGH SITE (Global ID: T0605999024) 211 MAIN ORANGE, CA 92868 Completed - Case Closed 1/19/2001 8/3/2000 16 ORANGE COUNTY LOP (LEAD) - CASE #: 00UT024 CASEWORKER:SHYAMALA KALYANASUNDARAM - SUPERVISOR: GENIECE HIGGINS SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) - CASE #: 083003769T CASEWORKER:ROSE SCOTT - SUPERVISOR: Ken Williams SITE HISTORY <NO SITE HISTORY ENTERED> CLEANUP ACTION INFO ACTION TYPE BEGIN DATE END DATE PHASE CONTAMINANT MASS REMOVED DESCRIPTION EXCAVATION 1/1/1965 1/1/1965 RISK INFORMATION VIEW CASE REVIEWS CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN CURRENT LAND USE BENEFICIAL USE DISCHARGE SOURCE DATE REPORTED STOP METHOD NEARBY / IMPACTED WELLS Diesel Commercial GW - Municipal and Domestic Supply 8/3/2000 Close and Remove Tank 0 FREE PRODUCT OTHER CONSTITUENTS NAME OF WATER SYSTEM LAST REGULATORY ACTIVITY LAST ESI UPLOAD LAST EDF UPLOAD EXPECTED CLOSURE DATE MOST RECENT CLOSURE REQUEST 1/1/1950 CDPH WELLS WITHIN 1500 FEET OF THIS SITE NONE CALCULATED FIELDS (BASED ON LATITUDE / LONGITUDE) APN GW BASIN NAME Coastal Plain Of Orange County (8-1) WATERSHED NAME Santa Ana River - Lower Santa Ana River - East Coastal Plain (801.11) COUNTY Orange PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM(S) •CITY OF ORANGE - 189 SOUTH WATER STREET, ORANGE, CA 92866 •METROPOLITAN WATER DIST. OF SO. CAL. - P.O. BOX 54153, LOS ANGELES, CA 90054 MOST RECENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO GROUNDWATER DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE MOST RECENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM CONSTITUENTS IN SOIL VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO SOIL DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE MOST RECENT GEO_WELL DATA VIEW ESI SUBMITTALS NO GEO_WELL DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO GEOTRACKER ESI FOR THIS SITE Page 1 of 1 11/7/2016http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/csm_report?global_id=T0605999024 APPENDIX H ERIS Database Report Project Property:CFA Orange 202 S Main St Orange CA 92868 Project No:2E-1610014 Report Type:Database Report Order No: 20161031177 Requested by:Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. Date Completed: November 2, 2016 2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Table of Contents Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report:No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse:Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS:The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright:You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report(s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property.................................................................................10 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties......................................................................11 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................15 Map...............................................................................................................21 Aerial.............................................................................................................24 Detail Report.................................................................................................25 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................67 Unplottable Report........................................................................................68 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................70 Definitions.....................................................................................................89 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property:CFA Orange 202 S Main St Orange CA 92868 Project No:2E-1610014 Coordinates: Latitude:33.785838 Longitude:-117.867746 UTM Northing:3,738,748.80 UTM Easting:419,663.78 UTM Zone:UTM Zone 11S Elevation:159 FT Order Information: Order No:20161031177 Date Requested:October 31, 2016 Requested by:Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. Report Type:Database Report Historicals/Products: Chain of Title & Lien Searches 60-YR Historic Chain of Title Report with Environmental Lien Search Report City Directory Search 2 Street Search Executive Summary 4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Standard Environmental Records Federal rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y .25 0 1 2 -- 3 rr-RCRA CESQG-aa Y .25 0 0 1 -- 1 rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FED ENG-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED INST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FEMA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 State rr-RESPONSE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 rr-ENVIROSTOR-aa Y 1 0 0 1 0 9 10 rr-SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HWP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 rr-LDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-LUST-aa Y .5 0 3 4 4 - 11 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST RESPONSE ENVIROSTOR SWF/LF HWP LDS LUST Executive Summary: Report Summary 5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-DLST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UST-aa Y .25 0 1 1 -- 2 rr-AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED TNK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-UST CLOSURE-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HHSS-aa Y .25 0 2 3 -- 5 rr-LUR-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HLUR-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DEED-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-VCP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CLEANUP SITES-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Tribal rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED ILST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED IUST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 County rr-ALPINE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-AMADOR CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ASTS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ALAMEDA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ALAMEDA LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BERKELEY CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BKRSFIELD CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BURBANK CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BUTTE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-CALAVERAS CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-CALAVERAS LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CALAVERAS LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CALAVERAS UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-COLUSA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-CONTRACO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-UCUP-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELNORTE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ELDORADO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ELSEGUNDO UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FRESNO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-GLENN CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HAYWARD CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HUMBOLDT CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 DLST UST AST DELISTED TNK UST CLOSURE HHSS LUR HLUR DEED VCP CLEANUP SITES INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST ALPINE CUPA AMADOR CUPA ASTS ALAMEDA UST ALAMEDA LOP BERKELEY CUPA BKRSFIELD CUPA BURBANK CUPA BUTTE CUPA CALAVERAS CUPA CALAVERAS LF CALAVERAS LUST CALAVERAS UST COLUSA CUPA CONTRACO CUPA UCUP DELNORTE CUPA ELDORADO CUPA ELSEGUNDO UST FRESNO CUPA GLENN CUPA HAYWARD CUPA HUMBOLDT CUPA 6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-HWFS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HWMS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-IMPERIAL CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-INYO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-KERN CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-KERN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-KINGS CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-LA HMS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-LA LONGB UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-LA SWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-LAKE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-LASSEN CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MADERA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MARIN CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MARIPOSA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MENDOCINO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MERCED CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MONO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MONTEREY CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-NAPA LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-NAPA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-NEVADA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ORANGE AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ORANGE UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-OXNARD CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PLACER CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PLUMAS CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RIVERSIDE LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RIVERSIDE UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ROSEVILLE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SACRAMENTO HAZ-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SACRAMENTO TOX-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SAN BENITO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SAN JOSE HM-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SAN LEANDRO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANBERN CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANDIEGO HAZ-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANDIEGO SAM-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SANDIEGO SWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SANDIEGO UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANFRAN AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 HWFS HWMS IMPERIAL CUPA INYO CUPA KERN CUPA KERN UST KINGS CUPA LA HMS LA LONGB UST LA SWF LAKE CUPA LASSEN CUPA MADERA CUPA MARIN CUPA MARIPOSA CUPA MENDOCINO CUPA MERCED CUPA MONO CUPA MONTEREY CUPA NAPA LOP NAPA UST NEVADA CUPA ORANGE AST ORANGE UST OXNARD CUPA PLACER CUPA PLUMAS CUPA RIVERSIDE LOP RIVERSIDE UST ROSEVILLE CUPA SACRAMENTO HAZ SACRAMENTO TOX SAN BENITO CUPA SAN JOSE HM SAN LEANDRO CUPA SANBERN CUPA SANDIEGO HAZ SANDIEGO SAM SANDIEGO SWF SANDIEGO UST SANFRAN AST 7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-SANFRAN CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANFRAN LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SANFRAN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANJOAQUIN AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANJOAQUIN HW-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SANJOAQUIN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANLUISOB CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANMATEO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANMATEO LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SANTA BARB SMU-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SANTA MONICA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANTA MONICA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANTACLARA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANTACLARA GIL-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SANTACLARA LO-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SANTACRUZ CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SHASTA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SISKIYOU CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SOLANO CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SOLANO LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SOLANO UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SONOMA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SONOMA LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SONOMA PETAL-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-STANISLAUS CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SUTTER CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-TEHAMA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-TORRANCE UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-TRINITY CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-TULARE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-TUOLUMNE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-VENTURA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-VENTURA HLUFT-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-VENTURA INUST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-VERNON UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-YOLO UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-YUBA CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 Additional Environmental Records Federal rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 SANFRAN CUPA SANFRAN LOP SANFRAN UST SANJOAQUIN AST SANJOAQUIN HW SANJOAQUIN UST SANLUISOB CUPA SANMATEO CUPA SANMATEO LOP SANTA BARB SMU SANTA MONICA CUPA SANTA MONICA UST SANTACLARA CUPA SANTACLARA GIL SANTACLARA LO SANTACRUZ CUPA SHASTA CUPA SISKIYOU CUPA SOLANO CUPA SOLANO LOP SOLANO UST SONOMA CUPA SONOMA LOP SONOMA PETAL STANISLAUS CUPA SUTTER CUPA TEHAMA CUPA TORRANCE UST TRINITY CUPA TULARE CUPA TUOLUMNE CUPA VENTURA CUPA VENTURA HLUFT VENTURA INUST VERNON UST YOLO UST YUBA CUPA DELISTED FED DRY 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HMIRS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-NCDL-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-IODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MINES-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 State rr-INSP COMP ENF-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-CDL-aa Y .125 0 1 --- 1 rr-SCH-aa Y 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 rr-CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SWAT-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HAZNET-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SWRCB SWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DTSC HWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HIST MANIFEST-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-CDO/CAO-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 6 -- 6 rr-DELISTED DRYC-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County rr-HW INACTIVE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-LA SML-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RIVERSIDE HWG-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-RIVERSIDE HZH-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-SANJOAQUIN HM-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS NCDL ODI IODI TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS MINES INSP COMP ENF CDL SCH CHMIRS SWAT HAZNET SWRCB SWF DTSC HWF HIST MANIFEST HIST CHMIRS CDO/CAO DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC HW INACTIVE LA SML RIVERSIDE HWG RIVERSIDE HZH SANJOAQUIN HM 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-UNION CITY CERS CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-VENTURA HAZR-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 Total:0 8 19 4 15 46 * PO – Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. UNION CITY CERS CUPA VENTURA HAZR DELISTED COUNTY 10 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number No records found in the selected databases for the project property. Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 11 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m1d dd-LUST-820176246-aa FORMER ROSEBURROUGH SITE 211 MAIN ORANGE CA 92868 ESE 0.04 / 191.99 0 p1p-25-820176246-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605999024 / Completed - Case Closed m2d dd-LUST-820202906-aa ROGER MILLER FORD 230 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 SSE 0.05 / 252.45 0 p1p-26-820202906-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605901393 / Completed - Case Closed m3d dd-HHSS-822977822-aa EARNEST FORD INC 230 S. MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 SSE 0.05 / 257.26 -1 p1p-27-822977822-x1x m3d dd-RCRA SQG-810485542-aa DAVID WILSONS FORD OF ORANGE 230 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 SSE 0.05 / 257.26 -1 p1p-27-810485542-x1x m4d dd-LUST-820192312-aa TUNE UP CENTER 193 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 ENE 0.06 / 296.07 3 p1p-28-820192312-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605999017 / Completed - Case Closed m5d dd-CDL-820124545-aa 1249 W PALMYRA PL ORANGE CA 92686 SE 0.11 / 555.68 2 p1p-29-820124545-x1x m6d dd-HHSS-822976710-aa 7-ELEVEN STORE 19969 (2112) 290 SOUTH MAIN ST. ORANGE CA 92666 SSE 0.11 / 566.06 -2 p1p-29-822976710-x1x m6d dd-UST-820070788-aa 7-ELEVEN STORE NO. 19969 290 S. MAIN STREET Orange CA 92868 SSE 0.11 / 566.06 -2 p1p-29-820070788-x1x Facility ID: 30-030-012352 m7d dd-RCRA CESQG-821920137-aa WALGREENS #3815 111 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 NNE 0.13 / 669.53 2 p1p-29-821920137-x1x m8d dd-LUST-820201310-aa DON CLARK AUTO 305 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 S 0.14 / 720.73 -2 p1p-30-820201310-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605901501 / Completed - Case Closed m9d dd-HHSS-822953922-aa DON CLARK AUTO SERVICE 305 SO. MAIN ORANGE CA 92668 S 0.14 / 732.69 -2 p1p-32-822953922-x1x m10d dd-HHSS-822952288-aa 93098 1409 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 N 0.14 / 751.72 0 p1p-32-822952288-x1x 25 26 27 27 28 29 29 29 29 30 32 32 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 LUST LUST HHSS RCRA SQG LUST CDL HHSS UST RCRA CESQG LUST HHSS HHSS Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 12 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m11d dd-DRYCLEANERS-828934073-aa P J CASTLE INC 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682738 N 0.14 / 752.87 0 p1p-32-828934073-x1x m11d dd-DRYCLEANERS-828943749-aa ORANGE CLEANERS 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682738 N 0.14 / 752.87 0 p1p-32-828943749-x1x m11d dd-RCRA SQG-810490905-aa ORANGE MARTINIZING CLEANERS 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.14 / 752.87 0 p1p-32-810490905-x1x m12d dd-HHSS-822987873-aa ORANGE COAST CAR WASH 1405 W. CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92668 NNE 0.16 / 819.46 2 p1p-34-822987873-x1x m12d dd-UST-820071680-aa ORANGE AUTO HAND WASH 1405 W. CHAPMAN AVE. Orange CA 92868 NNE 0.16 / 819.46 2 p1p-34-820071680-x1x Facility ID: 30-030-058733 m13d dd-LUST-820193557-aa CHEVRON #9-3098 1409 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 NNE 0.16 / 855.73 2 p1p-34-820193557-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605901236 / Completed - Case Closed m14d dd-LUST-820172411-aa ORANGE COAST CAR WASH 1405 CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 NNE 0.16 / 858.06 3 p1p-35-820172411-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605901030 / Open - Verification Monitoring m15d dd-LUST-820195624-aa FAR WEST TOWING 1138 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 NE 0.18 / 974.20 3 p1p-38-820195624-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605901458 / Completed - Case Closed m16d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296510-aa RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.19 / 1,018.90 -1 p1p-39-820296510-x1x m16d dd-SCH-820263293-aa RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.19 / 1,018.90 -1 p1p-40-820263293-x1x m17d dd-DRYCLEANERS-828934988-aa CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANERS 358 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 928683834 S 0.20 / 1,076.50 -2 p1p-40-828934988-x1x m18d dd-DRYCLEANERS-828935223-aa VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 928680000 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 -7 p1p-41-828935223-x1x m18d dd-DRYCLEANERS-828938350-aa VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682604 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 -7 p1p-41-828938350-x1x 32 32 32 34 34 34 35 38 39 40 40 41 41 11 11 11 12 12 13 14 15 16 16 17 18 18 DRYCLEANERS DRYCLEANERS RCRA SQG HHSS UST LUST LUST LUST ENVIROSTOR SCH DRYCLEANERS DRYCLEANERS DRYCLEANERS 13 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m18d dd-DRYCLEANERS-828946758-aa VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 926680000 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 -7 p1p-41-828946758-x1x m18d dd-RCRA SQG-810596604-aa VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 -7 p1p-42-810596604-x1x m19d dd-LUST-820183678-aa MEDICAL PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION 1310 W STEWART ORANGE CA 92868 SSE 0.28 / 1,497.50 1 p1p-43-820183678-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605999125 / Completed - Case Closed m20d dd-LUST-820202706-aa SMOG EXPRESS 904 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 ENE 0.35 / 1,827.51 12 p1p-43-820202706-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605901289 / Completed - Case Closed m21d dd-LUST-820205472-aa SOUTHLAND LOCATION #19969 290 MAIN ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.38 / 2,030.91 2 p1p-45-820205472-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605902246 / Completed - Case Closed m22d dd-LUST-820188286-aa MITCHELL AUTO SERVICE 700 CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 ENE 0.47 / 2,462.93 17 p1p-45-820188286-x1x Global ID / Status: T0605902228 / Completed - Case Closed m23d dd-RCRA CORRACTS-810472350-aa AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 92866 E 0.61 / 3,222.66 23 p1p-46-810472350-x1x m24d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820298269-aa AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 E 0.61 / 3,227.39 23 p1p-49-820298269-x1x m24d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296386-aa AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 E 0.61 / 3,227.39 23 p1p-50-820296386-x1x m24d dd-HWP-820356897-aa AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA E 0.61 / 3,227.39 23 p1p-51-820356897-x1x m25d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820360875-aa AMF NEWPORT DIVERS 426 WEST ALMOND ORANGE CA 92667 E 0.61 / 3,242.57 24 p1p-52-820360875-x1x m26d dd-RESPONSE-825116012-aa AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 E 0.65 / 3,442.72 23 p1p-53-825116012-x1x ESTOR EPA ID: CAD049901176 m27d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296821-aa STATEK CORP.512 N. MAIN STREET ORANGE CA 92668 N 0.68 / 3,579.64 -3 p1p-54-820296821-x1x m28d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820294492-aa DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE N 0.71 / 3,741.21 -6 p1p-54-820294492-x1x 41 42 43 43 45 45 46 49 50 51 52 53 54 54 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 24 25 26 27 28 DRYCLEANERS RCRA SQG LUST LUST LUST LUST RCRA CORRACTS ENVIROSTOR ENVIROSTOR HWP ENVIROSTOR RESPONSE ENVIROSTOR ENVIROSTOR 14 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number ORANGE CA 926680000 m28d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296822-aa STEVENS METAL FINISHING 1607 W. ORANGEGROVE AVENUE #D ORANGE CA 92668 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 -6 p1p-55-820296822-x1x m28d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820359765-aa DATA CIRCUITS INC. 1607 WEST ORANGEGROVE, SUITE A ORANGE CA 92667 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 -6 p1p-59-820359765-x1x m28d dd-RCRA CORRACTS-810473628-aa DATA CIRCUITS INC 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE A ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 -6 p1p-59-810473628-x1x m29d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820297943-aa DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 N 0.75 / 3,978.64 -4 p1p-62-820297943-x1x m29d dd-HWP-820356573-aa DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA N 0.75 / 3,978.64 -4 p1p-64-820356573-x1x m29d dd-RESPONSE-825115882-aa DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 N 0.75 / 3,978.64 -4 p1p-64-825115882-x1x ESTOR EPA ID: CAD067625129 m30d dd-ENVIROSTOR-820298067-aa INDEPENDENT FORGE CO. 692 N. BATAVIA ORANGE CA 92665 NNE 0.96 / 5,074.91 13 p1p-65-820298067-x1x 55 59 59 62 64 64 65 28 28 28 29 29 29 30 ENVIROSTOR ENVIROSTOR RCRA CORRACTS ENVIROSTOR HWP RESPONSE ENVIROSTOR 15 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard Federal RCRA CORRACTS - RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action A search of the RCRA CORRACTS database, dated Sep 6, 2016 has found that there are 2 RCRA CORRACTS site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 92866 E 0.61 / 3,222.66 m-23-810472350-a Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key DATA CIRCUITS INC 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE A ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 m-28-810473628-a RCRA SQG - RCRA Small Quantity Generators List A search of the RCRA SQG database, dated Sep 6, 2016 has found that there are 3 RCRA SQG site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key DAVID WILSONS FORD OF ORANGE 230 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 SSE 0.05 / 257.26 m-3-810485542-a ORANGE MARTINIZING CLEANERS 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.14 / 752.87 m-11-810490905-a VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 m-18-810596604-a RCRA CESQG - RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List A search of the RCRA CESQG database, dated Sep 6, 2016 has found that there are 1 RCRA CESQG site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key WALGREENS #3815 111 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 NNE 0.13 / 669.53 m-7-821920137-a 23 28 3 11 18 7 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source 16 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 State RESPONSE - State Response Sites A search of the RESPONSE database, dated Jun 30, 2016 has found that there are 2 RESPONSE site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 E 0.65 / 3,442.72 m-26-825116012-a ESTOR EPA ID: CAD049901176 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 N 0.75 / 3,978.64 m-29-825115882-a ESTOR EPA ID: CAD067625129 ENVIROSTOR - EnviroStor Database A search of the ENVIROSTOR database, dated Aug 22, 2016 has found that there are 10 ENVIROSTOR site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 E 0.61 / 3,227.39 m-24-820296386-a AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 E 0.61 / 3,227.39 m-24-820298269-a AMF NEWPORT DIVERS 426 WEST ALMOND ORANGE CA 92667 E 0.61 / 3,242.57 m-25-820360875-a INDEPENDENT FORGE CO. 692 N. BATAVIA ORANGE CA 92665 NNE 0.96 / 5,074.91 m-30-820298067-a Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.19 / 1,018.90 m-16-820296510-a STATEK CORP. 512 N. MAIN STREET ORANGE CA 92668 N 0.68 / 3,579.64 m-27-820296821-a DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 m-28-820294492-a 26 29 24 24 25 30 16 27 28 17 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key STEVENS METAL FINISHING 1607 W. ORANGEGROVE AVENUE #D ORANGE CA 92668 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 m-28-820296822-a DATA CIRCUITS INC. 1607 WEST ORANGEGROVE, SUITE A ORANGE CA 92667 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 m-28-820359765-a DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 N 0.75 / 3,978.64 m-29-820297943-a HWP - EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities A search of the HWP database, dated Jul 18, 2016 has found that there are 2 HWP site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA E 0.61 / 3,227.39 m-24-820356897-a Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA N 0.75 / 3,978.64 m-29-820356573-a LUST - Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports A search of the LUST database, dated Aug 25, 2016 has found that there are 11 LUST site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key TUNE UP CENTER 193 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 ENE 0.06 / 296.07 m-4-820192312-a Global ID / Status: T0605999017 / Completed - Case Closed CHEVRON #9-3098 1409 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 NNE 0.16 / 855.73 m-13-820193557-a Global ID / Status: T0605901236 / Completed - Case Closed ORANGE COAST CAR WASH 1405 CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 NNE 0.16 / 858.06 m-14-820172411-a Global ID / Status: T0605901030 / Open - Verification Monitoring FAR WEST TOWING 1138 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 NE 0.18 / 974.20 m-15-820195624-a Global ID / Status: T0605901458 / Completed - Case Closed 28 28 29 24 29 4 13 14 15 18 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key MEDICAL PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION 1310 W STEWART ORANGE CA 92868 SSE 0.28 / 1,497.50 m-19-820183678-a Global ID / Status: T0605999125 / Completed - Case Closed SMOG EXPRESS 904 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 ENE 0.35 / 1,827.51 m-20-820202706-a Global ID / Status: T0605901289 / Completed - Case Closed SOUTHLAND LOCATION #19969 290 MAIN ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.38 / 2,030.91 m-21-820205472-a Global ID / Status: T0605902246 / Completed - Case Closed MITCHELL AUTO SERVICE 700 CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 ENE 0.47 / 2,462.93 m-22-820188286-a Global ID / Status: T0605902228 / Completed - Case Closed Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key FORMER ROSEBURROUGH SITE 211 MAIN ORANGE CA 92868 ESE 0.04 / 191.99 m-1-820176246-a Global ID / Status: T0605999024 / Completed - Case Closed ROGER MILLER FORD 230 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 SSE 0.05 / 252.45 m-2-820202906-a Global ID / Status: T0605901393 / Completed - Case Closed DON CLARK AUTO 305 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 S 0.14 / 720.73 m-8-820201310-a Global ID / Status: T0605901501 / Completed - Case Closed UST - Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker A search of the UST database, dated Jul 18, 2016 has found that there are 2 UST site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key ORANGE AUTO HAND WASH 1405 W. CHAPMAN AVE. Orange CA 92868 NNE 0.16 / 819.46 m-12-820071680-a Facility ID: 30-030-058733 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key 7-ELEVEN STORE NO. 19969 290 S. MAIN STREET Orange CA 92868 SSE 0.11 / 566.06 m-6-820070788-a Facility ID: 30-030-012352 HHSS - Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database A search of the HHSS database, dated Aug 27, 2015 has found that there are 5 HHSS site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. 19 20 21 22 1 2 8 12 6 19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key ORANGE COAST CAR WASH 1405 W. CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92668 NNE 0.16 / 819.46 m-12-822987873-a Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key EARNEST FORD INC 230 S. MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 SSE 0.05 / 257.26 m-3-822977822-a 7-ELEVEN STORE 19969 (2112)290 SOUTH MAIN ST. ORANGE CA 92666 SSE 0.11 / 566.06 m-6-822976710-a DON CLARK AUTO SERVICE 305 SO. MAIN ORANGE CA 92668 S 0.14 / 732.69 m-9-822953922-a 93098 1409 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 N 0.14 / 751.72 m-10-822952288-a Non Standard State CDL - Clandestine Drug Lab Sites A search of the CDL database, dated Dec 31, 2015 has found that there are 1 CDL site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key 1249 W PALMYRA PL ORANGE CA 92686 SE 0.11 / 555.68 m-5-820124545-a SCH - School Property Evaluation Program Sites A search of the SCH database, dated Jul 19, 2016 has found that there are 1 SCH site(s) within approximately 1.00 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE ORANGE CA 92868 N 0.19 / 1,018.90 m-16-820263293-a DRYCLEANERS - Drycleaner Facilities A search of the DRYCLEANERS database, dated Sep 1, 2016 has found that there are 6 DRYCLEANERS site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. 12 3 6 9 10 5 16 20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key P J CASTLE INC 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682738 N 0.14 / 752.87 m-11-828934073-a ORANGE CLEANERS 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682738 N 0.14 / 752.87 m-11-828943749-a CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANERS 358 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 928683834 S 0.20 / 1,076.50 m-17-828934988-a VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 926680000 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 m-18-828946758-a VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682604 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 m-18-828938350-a VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 928680000 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 m-18-828935223-a 11 11 17 18 18 18 #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #*#*#*#*#* ^_ m9c m8c m7c m5c m4c m2c m1c m30c m27c m26c m25c m23c m22c m21c m20c m19c m17c m15cm14cm10c m6c(2) m3c(2) m29c(3) m28c(4) m18c(4) m16c(2) m12c(2)m11c(3)Santa Ana RiverS a ntia g o C r e ekBitterbushChannelI- 5 N I- 5 S I- 5 N I- 5 S CA-22 E CA-22 WCA-57 SCA- 5 7 NCA-57SCA-57 NCA-57N117°51'W117°51'30"W117°52'W117°52'30"W117°53'W 33°48'N33°48'N33°47'30"N33°47'30"N33°47'N33°47'N33°46'30"N33°46'30"N0.25 0 0.250.125 Miles Order No: 20161031177 Map : 1 Mile Radius 1:18200 Address: 202 S Main St, Orange, CA, 92868 Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Property Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation Areas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield Areas State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas) 9 8 7 5 4 2 1 30 27 26 25 23 22 21 20 19 17 151410 6 (2) 3 (2) 29 (3) 28 (4) 18 (4) 16 (2) 12 (2)11 (3) #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* ^_ m9c m8c m7c m5c m4c m2c m1c m22c m21c m20c m19c m17c m15c m14c m13c m10c m6c(2) m3c(2) m18c(4) m16c(2) m12c(2) m11c(3) B i t t e r b u shChannelI- 5 N I- 5 S I- 5 N CA-22 ECA-22 W W Maple Ave W Almond Ave S Parker StW La Veta Ave W Sycamore Ave W Palmyra Ave W Palm Ave N Main StSFlowerStS Batavia StS Main StW Culver Ave W Chapman Ave S Crest RdN Batavia StN Eckhoff StS Devon RdS Pixley StN Jewell PlS Feldner RdW W illowAveS Bedford RdN Flower StS Bush StW Cherry Dr W Robin Rd N Clark StN Stevens StW Mills Dr S Lime StN Lime StW S pruceAveS Clark StFlower St N Holly StMain Place Dr N Parker StS Citrus StN Citrus StN Pixley StBronson St N Elm StS Alpine RdN Ash StN Lester DrS Pepper StW Birch Ave S Marks WayN Fir StN Feldner RdW Larkspur Dr W Acacia Ave S Poinsettia DrS L a V e taParkCirNPoplarStW Orchard Ave Canf i e l d P l S McCoy RdN Fairmont StS Glenview PlN Cedar StW Arbor Way W Stewart DrS La Linda DrS Silktree CirS Castle CirW Providence AveS Louise PlS Camille CirS Flower CirN Clark StN Lime StS Citrus StN Poplar StW Palmyra Ave W Chapman Ave S Pixley StS Clark StNCitrusStW La Veta Ave S P e pperStS Main StN Stevens StN Lime StS Bedford RdS Lime StN Flower StW Cherry Dr S Clark StN Parker St117°51'30"W117°52'W117°52'30"W 33°47'30"N33°47'30"N33°47'N33°47'N0.1 0 0.10.05 Miles Order No: 20161031177 Map : 0.5 Mile Radius 1:9100 Address: 202 S Main St, Orange, CA, 92868 Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Property Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation Areas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield Areas State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas) 9 8 7 5 4 2 1 22 21 20 19 17 15 14 10 6 (2) 3 (2) 18 (4) 16 (2) 12 (2) 11 (3) 13 #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#* ^_ m9cm8c m7c m5c m4c m2c m1c m19c m17c m15c m14c m13cm10c m6c(2) m3c(2) m18c(4) m16c(2) m12c(2)m11c(3) W Maple Ave S Main StW Almond Ave W Palmyra Ave W Culver Ave S Feldner RdW Chapman Ave S Bush StW Robin Rd NMainStS Crest RdS Devon RdN Jewell PlS Lime StS Bedford RdN Lester DrS Pepper StN Fir StN Feldner RdS McCoy RdS Citrus StW Arbor Way W Stewart Dr W Paul Rd S La Linda DrS Castle CirS Carmen CirW Columbia Pl W Palmyra Ave SMainS t W Chapman Ave S Bush StS Lime St117°52'W 33°47'N33°47'N0.07 0 0.070.035 Miles Order No: 20161031177 Map : 0.25 Mile Radius 1:4600 Address: 202 S Main St, Orange, CA, 92868 Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Property Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation Areas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield Areas State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas) 98 7 5 4 2 1 19 17 15 14 10 6 (2) 3 (2) 18 (4) 16 (2) 12 (2)11 (3)13 ^_ Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 117°51'30"W117°52'W117°52'30"W 33°47'30"N33°47'30"N33°47'N33°47'N0.15 0 0.150.075 Miles Order No: 20161031177Aerial 1:11100 Address: 202 S Main St, Orange, CA, 92868 © ERIS Information Inc.Source: ESRI World Imagery 25 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Detail Report Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB m-1-820176246-b 1 of 1 ESE 0.04 / 191.99 158.86 FORMER ROSEBURROUGH SITE 211 MAIN ORANGE CA 92868 dd-LUST-820176246-bb p1p-820176246-y1y Global ID:T0605999024 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2001-01-19 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083003769T LOC Case Number:00UT024 CUF Case:NO Potential Cntm of Concrn:Diesel Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.785707 Longitude:-117.867134 Lead Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker:SK Local Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP File Location:Local Agency Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:2000-08-03 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2001-01-19 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:2000-08-03 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:Other Date:2000-08-03 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:ROSE SCOTT Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:rscott@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number:9513206375 ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:SHYAMALA KALYANASUNDARAM Organization Name:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address:1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120 City:SANTA ANA Email:ssundaram@ochca.com Phone Number:7144336262 ---- 1 LUST Detail Report 26 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB m-2-820202906-b 1 of 1 SSE 0.05 / 252.45 158.86 ROGER MILLER FORD 230 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 dd-LUST-820202906-bb p1p-820202906-y1y Global ID:T0605901393 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1998-10-05 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083001866T LOC Case Number: CUF Case:YES Potential Cntm of Concrn:Gasoline Potential Media Affected:Aquifer used for drinking water supply County:Orange Latitude:33.7851706 Longitude:-117.8675171 Lead Agency:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Case Worker:TME Local Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF File Location: Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1991-03-22 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date:1996-12-15 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1998-10-05 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1991-03-22 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Action Type:Other Date:1991-03-22 00:00:00 Action:Leak Stopped ---- Action Type:Other Date:1991-04-29 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:1998-10-05 00:00:00 Action:Closure/No Further Action Letter ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number:9513202007 ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:KATHY DASCOMB Organization Name:ORANGE, CITY OF Address:2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUE City:SANTA ANA Email:kdascomb@cityoforange.org Phone Number:7146673773 2 LUST 27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB ---- m-3-822977822-b 1 of 2 SSE 0.05 / 257.26 158.06 EARNEST FORD INC 230 S. MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 dd-HHSS-822977822-bb p1p-822977822-y1y County: Pdf File Url:http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002e882.pdf m-3-810485542-b 2 of 2 SSE 0.05 / 257.26 158.06 DAVID WILSONS FORD OF ORANGE 230 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 dd-RCRA SQG-810485542-bb p1p-810485542-y1y County Name:ORANGE County Code:CA059 EPA Handler ID:CAD981626807 Current Site Name:DAVID WILSONS FORD OF ORANGE Generator Status Universe:Small Quantity Generator Land Type:Private Activity Location:CA TSD Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Importer Activity:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Recycler Activity:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Inject Activity:No Rece Waste From Off Site:No Used Oil Transporter: Used Oil Transfer Facility: Used Oil Processor: Used Oil Refiner: Used Oil Burner: Used Oil Market Burner: Used Oil Spec Marketer: Mailing Address:230 S MAIN ST, , ORANGE, CA, 92868, Contact Name:THEODORE TOMASEK Contact Address:1400 N TUSTIN, , ORANGE, CA, 92667, US Contact Email: Location Street 2: ---- Owner/Operator Information ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CO Owner/Operator Name:DAVID WILSON Owner/Operator Address: 1400 N TUSTIN ORANGE CA 92667 Owner/Operator Phone:7146396750 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- NAICS Information ---- Handler Information ---- Date Received:19940520 Facility Name:DAVID WILSONS FORD OF ORANGE Classification:Small Quantity Generator ---- Hazardous Waste Information ---- Violation/Evaluation Information 3 3 HHSS RCRA SQG 28 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB ---- m-4-820192312-b 1 of 1 ENE 0.06 / 296.07 161.62 TUNE UP CENTER 193 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 dd-LUST-820192312-bb p1p-820192312-y1y Global ID:T0605999017 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1999-01-25 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083003729T LOC Case Number: CUF Case:NO Potential Cntm of Concrn:Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.786261 Longitude:-117.866914 Lead Agency:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Case Worker:PAH Local Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF File Location: Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1998-10-05 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1999-01-25 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1998-10-05 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Action Type:Other Date:1998-10-05 00:00:00 Action:Leak Stopped ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:1999-01-25 00:00:00 Action:Closure/No Further Action Letter ---- Action Type:Other Date:1999-01-25 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:KATHY DASCOMB Organization Name:ORANGE, CITY OF Address:2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUE City:SANTA ANA Email:kdascomb@cityoforange.org Phone Number:7146673773 ---- 4 LUST 29 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB m-5-820124545-b 1 of 1 SE 0.11 / 555.68 160.64 1249 W PALMYRA PL ORANGE CA 92686 dd-CDL-820124545-bb p1p-820124545-y1y Clue:1997-11-081 Date:11/18/1997 Lab Type:L County:ORANGE Lab Type Description:Illegal Drug Lab - location where an illegal drug lab was operated or drug lab equipment and/or materials were stored. m-6-822976710-b 1 of 2 SSE 0.11 / 566.06 157.03 7-ELEVEN STORE 19969 (2112) 290 SOUTH MAIN ST. ORANGE CA 92666 dd-HHSS-822976710-bb p1p-822976710-y1y County: Pdf File Url:http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002ef0d.pdf m-6-820070788-b 2 of 2 SSE 0.11 / 566.06 157.03 7-ELEVEN STORE NO. 19969 290 S. MAIN STREET Orange CA 92868 dd-UST-820070788-bb p1p-820070788-y1y Facility ID:30-030-012352 Latitude:33.7856547 County:Orange Longitude:-117.8663631 Permitting Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF m-7-821920137-b 1 of 1 NNE 0.13 / 669.53 161.05 WALGREENS #3815 111 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868 dd-RCRA CESQG-821920137-bb p1p-821920137-y1y County Name:ORANGE County Code:CA059 EPA Handler ID:CAL000323573 Current Site Name:WALGREENS #3815 Generator Status Universe:Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Land Type:Private Activity Location:CA TSD Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Importer Activity:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Recycler Activity:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Inject Activity:No Rece Waste From Off Site:No Used Oil Transporter: Used Oil Transfer Facility: Used Oil Processor: Used Oil Refiner: Used Oil Burner: Used Oil Market Burner: Used Oil Spec Marketer: Mailing Address:3207, GREY HAWK CT STE 200, , CARLSBAD, CA, 92010, Contact Name:KARINA E ROMERO Contact Address:3207, GREY HAWK CT STE 200, , CARLSBAD, CA, 92010, Contact Email:KROMERO@3ECOMPANY.COM Location Street 2: ---- Owner/Operator Information ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CP 5 6 6 7 CDL HHSS UST RCRA CESQG 30 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Owner/Operator Name:WALGREEN CO Owner/Operator Address: Owner/Operator Phone: Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current:19961223 Date Ended Current: ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CO Owner/Operator Name:VRSJ LLC C/O INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT CO Owner/Operator Address:204 E 17TH ST STE 202 COSTA MESA CA 92627 Owner/Operator Phone:9497642674 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current:19961223 Date Ended Current: ---- NAICS Information ---- Naics Code:44611 Naics Description:PHARMACIES AND DRUG STORES ---- Handler Information ---- Date Received:20140301 Facility Name:WALGREENS #3815 Classification:Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity ---- Hazardous Waste Information ---- Waste Code:D001 Waste:IGNITABLE WASTE ---- Waste Code:D024 Waste:M-CRESOL ---- Waste Code:U034 Waste:ACETALDEHYDE, TRICHLORO- (OR) CHLORAL ---- Waste Code:D009 Waste:MERCURY ---- Waste Code:D010 Waste:SELENIUM ---- Waste Code:P001 Waste:2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% ---- Waste Code:U165 Waste:NAPHTHALENE ---- Waste Code:D002 Waste:CORROSIVE WASTE ---- Waste Code:D007 Waste:CHROMIUM ---- Waste Code:P075 Waste:NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, & SALTS ---- Violation/Evaluation Information ---- m-8-820201310-b 1 of 1 S 0.14 / 720.73 157.44 DON CLARK AUTO 305 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92668 dd-LUST-820201310-bb p1p-820201310-y1y 8 LUST 31 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Global ID:T0605901501 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1992-03-18 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083002010T LOC Case Number: CUF Case:NO Potential Cntm of Concrn:Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.7838965 Longitude:-117.8672716 Lead Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF Case Worker:UNK Local Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF File Location: Status History ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1992-02-04 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1992-02-04 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1992-02-13 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1992-03-18 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1992-02-04 00:00:00 Action:Leak Stopped ---- Action Type:Other Date:1992-02-04 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Action Type:Other Date:1992-02-04 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:1992-03-18 00:00:00 Action:Closure/No Further Action Letter ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:UNK Organization Name:ORANGE, CITY OF Address: City:r8 UNKNOWN Email: Phone Number: ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: ---- 32 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB m-9-822953922-b 1 of 1 S 0.14 / 732.69 157.35 DON CLARK AUTO SERVICE 305 SO. MAIN ORANGE CA 92668 dd-HHSS-822953922-bb p1p-822953922-y1y County: Pdf File Url:http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002e867.pdf m-10-822952288-b 1 of 1 N 0.14 / 751.72 158.86 93098 1409 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 dd-HHSS-822952288-bb p1p-822952288-y1y County: Pdf File Url:http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002e6fc.pdf m-11-828934073-b 1 of 3 N 0.14 / 752.87 158.62 P J CASTLE INC 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682738 dd-DRYCLEANERS-828934073-bb p1p-828934073-y1y EPA ID:CAD981991524 Owner Zip:928682738 Create Date:7/3/1987 Owner Phone:7146396160 Facility Act Ind:No Owner Fax: In Act Date:8/18/2005 Contact Name:P CASTLE/OWNER J CASTLE/OPTR County Name:Orange Contact Street 1:1437 W CHAPMAN AVE Region Code:4 Contact Street 2: Owner Name:PAT CASTLE Contact City:ORANGE Owner Street 1:734 N VICTORIA DR Contact State:CA Owner Street 2:Contact Zip:928682738 Owner City:ORANGE Contact Phone:7149787489 Owner State:CA Mail Name: --- Details --- NAICS Code:81232 Naics Desc:Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) SIC Code:7211 SIC Desc:Power Laundries, Family and Commercial m-11-828943749-b 2 of 3 N 0.14 / 752.87 158.62 ORANGE CLEANERS 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682738 dd-DRYCLEANERS-828943749-bb p1p-828943749-y1y EPA ID:CAL000297647 Owner Zip:928682738 Create Date:8/18/2005 10:29:02 AM Owner Phone:7149787489 Facility Act Ind:Yes Owner Fax:0000000000 In Act Date:Contact Name:PAUL NA County Name:Orange Contact Street 1:1437 W CHAPMAN AVE Region Code:4 Contact Street 2: Owner Name:JENNY NA Contact City:ORANGE Owner Street 1:1437 W CHAPMAN AVE Contact State:CA Owner Street 2:Contact Zip:92868 Owner City:ORANGE Contact Phone:7143517168 Owner State:CA Mail Name: --- Details --- NAICS Code:81232 Naics Desc:Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) SIC Code:7211 SIC Desc:Power Laundries, Family and Commercial m-11-810490905-b 3 of 3 N 0.14 / 752.87 158.62 ORANGE MARTINIZING CLEANERS 1437 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92868 dd-RCRA SQG-810490905-bb p1p-810490905-y1y 9 10 11 11 11 HHSS HHSS DRYCLEANERS DRYCLEANERS RCRA SQG 33 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB County Name:ORANGE County Code:CA059 EPA Handler ID:CAD981991524 Current Site Name:ORANGE MARTINIZING CLEANERS Generator Status Universe:Small Quantity Generator Land Type:Other Activity Location:CA TSD Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Importer Activity:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Recycler Activity:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Inject Activity:No Rece Waste From Off Site:No Used Oil Transporter: Used Oil Transfer Facility: Used Oil Processor: Used Oil Refiner: Used Oil Burner: Used Oil Market Burner: Used Oil Spec Marketer: Mailing Address:1437 W CHAPMAN AVE, , ORANGE, CA, 92868, Contact Name:ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact Address:1437 W CHAPMAN AVE, , ORANGE, CA, 92668, US Contact Email: Location Street 2: ---- Owner/Operator Information ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CO Owner/Operator Name:CHUNG R JOO Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED ME 99999 Owner/Operator Phone:4155551212 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CP Owner/Operator Name:NOT REQUIRED Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED ME 99999 Owner/Operator Phone:4155551212 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- NAICS Information ---- Naics Code:81232 Naics Description:DRYCLEANING AND LAUNDRY SERVICES (EXCEPT COIN-OPERATED) ---- Handler Information ---- Date Received:19870225 Facility Name:ORANGE MARTINIZING CLEANERS Classification:Small Quantity Generator ---- Hazardous Waste Information ---- Violation/Evaluation Information ---- 34 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB m-12-822987873-b 1 of 2 NNE 0.16 / 819.46 161.35 ORANGE COAST CAR WASH 1405 W. CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92668 dd-HHSS-822987873-bb p1p-822987873-y1y County: Pdf File Url:http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002ec3c.pdf m-12-820071680-b 2 of 2 NNE 0.16 / 819.46 161.35 ORANGE AUTO HAND WASH 1405 W. CHAPMAN AVE. Orange CA 92868 dd-UST-820071680-bb p1p-820071680-y1y Facility ID:30-030-058733 Latitude:33.7897744 County:Orange Longitude:-117.8653758 Permitting Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF m-13-820193557-b 1 of 1 NNE 0.16 / 855.73 161.35 CHEVRON #9-3098 1409 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 dd-LUST-820193557-bb p1p-820193557-y1y Global ID:T0605901236 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1994-04-19 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083001628T LOC Case Number: CUF Case:YES Potential Cntm of Concrn:Gasoline Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.7880696 Longitude:-117.8668571 Lead Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF Case Worker:UNK Local Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF File Location: Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1989-12-18 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1989-12-18 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Remediation Status Date:1990-01-11 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1990-01-19 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1990-04-20 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Remediation Status Date:1991-02-15 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1994-04-19 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1989-12-18 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- 12 12 13 HHSS UST LUST 35 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Action Type:Other Date:1989-12-18 00:00:00 Action:Leak Stopped ---- Action Type:Other Date:1990-08-28 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:UNK Organization Name:ORANGE, CITY OF Address: City:r8 UNKNOWN Email: Phone Number: ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:ROSE SCOTT Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:rscott@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number:9513206375 ---- m-14-820172411-b 1 of 1 NNE 0.16 / 858.06 161.60 ORANGE COAST CAR WASH 1405 CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 dd-LUST-820172411-bb p1p-820172411-y1y Global ID:T0605901030 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date:2007-04-06 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083001363T LOC Case Number:98UT013 CUF Case:YES Potential Cntm of Concrn:Diesel, MTBE / TBA / Other Fuel Oxygenates, Gasoline Potential Media Affected:Aquifer used for drinking water supply, Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.7880696 Longitude:-117.8668331 Lead Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker:SK Local Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP File Location:Local Agency Site History: Please refer to recent Site Documents or Monitoring Reports in GeoTracker for site history. Orange County is not responsible for the accuracy of any professional interpretations provided in reports submitted by consultants for the responsible party. Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1992-01-14 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Remediation Status Date:2002-12-26 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Remediation Status Date:2004-10-28 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date:2007-04-06 00:00:00 ---- 14 LUST 36 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1992-01-14 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:Other Date:1992-01-14 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2003-03-18 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2003-05-05 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2003-06-02 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2003-06-06 00:00:00 Action:Other Workplan ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2003-10-29 00:00:00 Action:Soil and Water Investigation Report ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2003-12-10 00:00:00 Action:* Historical Enforcement ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2004-04-12 00:00:00 Action:* Historical Enforcement ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2004-05-04 00:00:00 Action:* Corrective Action Orders ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2004-09-16 00:00:00 Action:* Corrective Action Orders ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2005-06-01 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2005-09-12 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2006-05-03 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2007-01-24 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2007-03-16 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2007-04-10 00:00:00 37 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2007-07-25 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2007-09-12 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2008-06-16 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2008-06-30 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2008-09-30 00:00:00 Action:Well Installation Report ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2009-07-09 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2010-04-08 00:00:00 Action:Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2011-03-15 00:00:00 Action:Notification - Public Notice of ROD/RAP/CAP ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2012-03-05 00:00:00 Action:Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2013-01-30 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2013-08-07 00:00:00 Action:Well Installation Workplan - Regulator Responded ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2013-10-02 00:00:00 Action:File review ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2013-10-03 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2013-10-04 00:00:00 Action:Well Installation Workplan - Regulator Responded ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2013-10-23 00:00:00 Action:Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2015-05-01 00:00:00 Action:File review ---- Action Type:RESPONSE Date:2015-10-19 00:00:00 38 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Action:Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action Plan - Addendum - Regulator Responded ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2015-10-28 00:00:00 Action:Notification - Public Notice of ROD/RAP/CAP ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2015-12-07 00:00:00 Action:File review ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2015-12-08 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number:9513202007 ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:SHYAMALA KALYANASUNDARAM Organization Name:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address:1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120 City:SANTA ANA Email:ssundaram@ochca.com Phone Number:7144336262 ---- m-15-820195624-b 1 of 1 NE 0.18 / 974.20 162.55 FAR WEST TOWING 1138 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 92668 dd-LUST-820195624-bb p1p-820195624-y1y Global ID:T0605901458 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1992-02-20 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083001954T LOC Case Number: CUF Case:NO Potential Cntm of Concrn:Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.7878661 Longitude:-117.8656526 Lead Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF Case Worker:UNK Local Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF File Location: Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1991-08-21 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1991-11-15 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1992-02-20 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- 15 LUST 39 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Action Type:Other Date:1991-08-21 00:00:00 Action:Leak Stopped ---- Action Type:Other Date:1991-09-12 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Action Type:Other Date:1991-10-28 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:1992-02-20 00:00:00 Action:Closure/No Further Action Letter ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:NANCY OLSON-MARTIN Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:UNK Organization Name:ORANGE, CITY OF Address: City:r8 UNKNOWN Email: Phone Number: ---- m-16-820296510-b 1 of 2 N 0.19 / 1,018.90 158.51 RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE ORANGE CA 92868 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296510-bb p1p-820296510-y1y Estor/EPA ID:30820003 Site Code:404171 Cleanup Status:NO ACTION REQUIRED AS OF 11/3/2000 Site Type:SCHOOL Potential Media Affected:NO MEDIA AFFECTED Past Uses Caused Contam:EDUCATIONAL SERVICES APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD Special Program: Funding:SCHOOL DISTRICT Acres:9 ACRES School District:ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92868 Potential Contaminants: NO CONTAMINANTS FOUND Site History: Facility Information ---- Program Type:SCHOOL EVALUATION Status:NO ACTION REQUIRED 16 ENVIROSTOR 40 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=30820003 ---- Completed Activities ---- Doc Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2.asp?global_id=30820003&doc_id=6003361 Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Phase 1 Date Completed:11/3/2000 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- m-16-820263293-b 2 of 2 N 0.19 / 1,018.90 158.51 RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE ORANGE CA 92868 dd-SCH-820263293-bb p1p-820263293-y1y ESTOR/EPA ID:30820003 Site Code:404171 Status:NO ACTION REQUIRED Cleanup Status:NO ACTION REQUIRED AS OF 11/3/2000 Program Type:SCHOOL EVALUATION Site Type:SCHOOL National Priorities List:NO Cl Up Oversight Agencies:DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD Special Program: County:ORANGE Funding:SCHOOL DISTRICT APN:NONE SPECIFIED Past Use Caused Contam:EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Potential Contam of Cncrn:NO CONTAMINANTS FOUND Potential Media Affected:NO MEDIA AFFECTED Acres:9 ACRES School District:ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=30820003 Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Latitude:33.7886 Longitude:-117.8683 Completed Activities ---- Date Completed:11/3/2000 Doc Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2.asp?global_id=30820003&doc_id=6003361 Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Phase 1 Comments: ---- m-17-828934988-b 1 of 1 S 0.20 / 1,076.50 157.27 CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANERS 358 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 928683834 dd-DRYCLEANERS-828934988-bb p1p-828934988-y1y EPA ID:CAL000299534 Owner Zip:928683834 Create Date:10/14/2005 3:45:18 PM Owner Phone:7149786359 Facility Act Ind:No Owner Fax:0000000000 In Act Date:6/30/2014 Contact Name:BILL ALVAREZ County Name:Orange Contact Street 1:358 S MAIN ST Region Code:4 Contact Street 2: Owner Name:CHANGO CORP Contact City:ORANGE Owner Street 1:358 S MAIN ST Contact State:CA Owner Street 2:Contact Zip:928683834 Owner City:ORANGE Contact Phone:9492549178 Owner State:CA Mail Name: 16 17 SCH DRYCLEANERS 41 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB --- Details --- NAICS Code:81232 Naics Desc:Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) SIC Code:7211 SIC Desc:Power Laundries, Family and Commercial m-18-828935223-b 1 of 4 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 152.36 VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 928680000 dd-DRYCLEANERS-828935223-bb p1p-828935223-y1y EPA ID:CAL000169387 Owner Zip:-- Create Date:5/8/1997 Owner Phone:0000000000 Facility Act Ind:No Owner Fax: In Act Date:6/30/2002 Contact Name:CHUNG NUNG SUM County Name:Orange Contact Street 1:1714 W CHAPMAN Region Code:4 Contact Street 2: Owner Name:NUNG SUM CHUNG Contact City:ORANGE Owner Street 1:1714 W CHAPMAN Contact State:CA Owner Street 2:Contact Zip:-- Owner City:ORANGE Contact Phone:-- Owner State:CA Mail Name: --- Details --- NAICS Code:81232 Naics Desc:Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) SIC Code:7211 SIC Desc:Power Laundries, Family and Commercial m-18-828938350-b 2 of 4 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 152.36 VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN AVE ORANGE CA 928682604 dd-DRYCLEANERS-828938350-bb p1p-828938350-y1y EPA ID:CAL000268648 Owner Zip:928680000 Create Date:4/4/2003 10:24:52 AM Owner Phone:7146348331 Facility Act Ind:No Owner Fax:0000000000 In Act Date:6/30/2014 Contact Name:FARIS ALTOWAIJI County Name:Orange Contact Street 1:1714 W CHAPMAN AVE Region Code:4 Contact Street 2: Owner Name:FARIS ALTOWAIJI Contact City:ORANGE Owner Street 1:1714 W CHAPMAN AVE Contact State:CA Owner Street 2:Contact Zip:928682604 Owner City:ORANGE Contact Phone:7146348331 Owner State:CA Mail Name: --- Details --- NAICS Code:81232 Naics Desc:Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) SIC Code:7211 SIC Desc:Power Laundries, Family and Commercial m-18-828946758-b 3 of 4 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 152.36 VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 926680000 dd-DRYCLEANERS-828946758-bb p1p-828946758-y1y EPA ID:CAD982438814 Owner Zip:926680000 Create Date:3/4/1991 Owner Phone:7146348331 Facility Act Ind:No Owner Fax: In Act Date:6/30/2003 Contact Name:FARIS ALTOWAIJI County Name:Orange Contact Street 1:1714 W CHAPMAN Region Code:4 Contact Street 2: Owner Name:FARIS ALTOWAIJI Contact City:ORANGE Owner Street 1:1714 W CHAPMAN Contact State:CA Owner Street 2:Contact Zip:926680000 Owner City:ORANGE Contact Phone:7146348331 Owner State:CA Mail Name: 18 18 18 DRYCLEANERS DRYCLEANERS DRYCLEANERS 42 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB --- Details --- NAICS Code:81232 Naics Desc:Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) SIC Code:7211 SIC Desc:Power Laundries, Family and Commercial m-18-810596604-b 4 of 4 NW 0.22 / 1,163.11 152.36 VIP CLEANERS 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 dd-RCRA SQG-810596604-bb p1p-810596604-y1y County Name:ORANGE County Code:CA059 EPA Handler ID:CAD982438814 Current Site Name:VIP CLEANERS Generator Status Universe:Small Quantity Generator Land Type:Private Activity Location:CA TSD Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Importer Activity:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Recycler Activity:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Inject Activity:No Rece Waste From Off Site:No Used Oil Transporter: Used Oil Transfer Facility: Used Oil Processor: Used Oil Refiner: Used Oil Burner: Used Oil Market Burner: Used Oil Spec Marketer: Mailing Address:1714 W CHAPMAN, , ORANGE, CA, 92868, Contact Name:NUNG SUN CHUNG Contact Address:1714 W CHAPMAN, , ORANGE, CA, 92868, US Contact Email: Location Street 2: ---- Owner/Operator Information ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CO Owner/Operator Name:NUNG SUN CHUNG Owner/Operator Address: 1714 W CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 Owner/Operator Phone:7146348331 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CP Owner/Operator Name:NOT REQUIRED Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED ME 99999 Owner/Operator Phone:4155551212 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- NAICS Information ---- Handler Information ---- Date Received:19960905 Facility Name:VIP CLEANERS Classification:Small Quantity Generator ---- 18 RCRA SQG 43 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Hazardous Waste Information ---- Violation/Evaluation Information ---- m-19-820183678-b 1 of 1 SSE 0.28 / 1,497.50 159.89 MEDICAL PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION 1310 W STEWART ORANGE CA 92868 dd-LUST-820183678-bb p1p-820183678-y1y Global ID:T0605999125 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2000-05-10 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083003746T LOC Case Number: CUF Case:NO Potential Cntm of Concrn:Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.78186 Longitude:-117.866477 Lead Agency:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Case Worker:RS Local Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF File Location: Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:2000-05-10 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2000-05-10 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:2000-05-10 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2004-06-21 00:00:00 Action:* No Action ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:ROSE SCOTT Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:rscott@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number:9513206375 ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:KATHY DASCOMB Organization Name:ORANGE, CITY OF Address:2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUE City:SANTA ANA Email:kdascomb@cityoforange.org Phone Number:7146673773 ---- m-20-820202706-b 1 of 1 ENE 0.35 / 1,827.51 170.89 SMOG EXPRESS 904 W CHAPMAN AVE dd-LUST-820202706-bb p1p-820202706-y1y 19 20 LUST LUST 44 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB ORANGE CA 92668 Global ID:T0605901289 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1992-01-29 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083001703T LOC Case Number: CUF Case:NO Potential Cntm of Concrn:Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.787581 Longitude:-117.862104 Lead Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF Case Worker:UNK Local Agency:ORANGE, CITY OF File Location: Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1991-09-19 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1991-09-25 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:1992-01-06 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:1992-01-29 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1991-09-19 00:00:00 Action:Leak Stopped ---- Action Type:Other Date:1991-09-25 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Action Type:Other Date:1992-01-06 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:1992-01-29 00:00:00 Action:Closure/No Further Action Letter ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:UNK Organization Name:ORANGE, CITY OF Address: City:r8 UNKNOWN Email: Phone Number: ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:phannon@waterboards.ca.gov 45 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Phone Number: ---- m-21-820205472-b 1 of 1 N 0.38 / 2,030.91 161.13 SOUTHLAND LOCATION #19969 290 MAIN ORANGE CA 92868 dd-LUST-820205472-bb p1p-820205472-y1y Global ID:T0605902246 Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2001-05-17 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083003383T LOC Case Number:99UT013 CUF Case:YES Potential Cntm of Concrn:Gasoline Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.7913327 Longitude:-117.866567 Lead Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker:SK Local Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP File Location:Local Agency Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1998-12-09 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2001-05-17 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1998-12-09 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:Other Date:1998-12-09 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:SHYAMALA KALYANASUNDARAM Organization Name:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address:1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120 City:SANTA ANA Email:ssundaram@ochca.com Phone Number:7144336262 ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number:9517824495 ---- m-22-820188286-b 1 of 1 ENE 0.47 / 2,462.93 175.73 MITCHELL AUTO SERVICE 700 CHAPMAN ORANGE CA 92868 dd-LUST-820188286-bb p1p-820188286-y1y Global ID:T0605902228 21 22 LUST LUST 46 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Case Type:LUST Cleanup Site Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2004-03-03 00:00:00 RB Case Number:083003328T LOC Case Number:98UT101 CUF Case:NO Potential Cntm of Concrn:Gasoline Potential Media Affected:Soil County:Orange Latitude:33.787607 Longitude:-117.85992 Lead Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Case Worker:SK Local Agency:ORANGE COUNTY LOP File Location:Local Agency Warehouse Status History ---- Status:Open - Case Begin Date Status Date:1998-11-03 00:00:00 ---- Status:Open - Site Assessment Status Date:2003-03-24 00:00:00 ---- Status:Completed - Case Closed Status Date:2004-03-03 00:00:00 ---- Activities ---- Action Type:Other Date:1998-11-03 00:00:00 Action:Leak Discovery ---- Action Type:Other Date:1998-11-03 00:00:00 Action:Leak Reported ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2004-02-17 00:00:00 Action:Staff Letter ---- Action Type:ENFORCEMENT Date:2004-03-03 00:00:00 Action:Closure/No Further Action Letter ---- Contact Information ---- Contact Type:Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name:SHYAMALA KALYANASUNDARAM Organization Name:ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address:1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120 City:SANTA ANA Email:ssundaram@ochca.com Phone Number:7144336262 ---- Contact Type:Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name:TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name:SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address:3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City:RIVERSIDE Email:tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number:9513202007 ---- m-23-810472350-b 1 of 1 E 0.61 / 3,222.66 181.93 AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 92866 dd-RCRA CORRACTS-810472350-bb p1p-810472350-y1y 23 RCRA CORRACTS 47 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB County Code:CA059 County Name:ORANGE EPA Handler ID:CAD049901176 Current Site Name:AMF VOIT INC Generator Status Universe:Small Quantity Generator Land Type:Private Activity Location:CA TSD Activity:Yes Mixed Waste Generator:No Importer Activity:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Recycler Activity:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Inject Activity:No Rece Waste From Off Site:No Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Mailing Address:426 W ALMOND, , ORANGE, CA, 92866, Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Email: Location Street 2: ---- Owner/Operator Information ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CP Owner/Operator Name:A M F VOIT INC Owner/Operator Address: 3801 S HARBOR BLVD SANTA ANA CA 92704 Owner/Operator Phone:7145464220 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CO Owner/Operator Name:LYLE SHELTON AND JOSEPH LAMONICA Owner/Operator Address: 427 W PALMYRA ST ORANGE CA 92666 Owner/Operator Phone:4155551212 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CO Owner/Operator Name:AMF INCORPORATED Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED ME 99999 Owner/Operator Phone:4155551212 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- NAICS Information ---- Naics Code:339932 Naics Description:GAME, TOY, AND CHILDREN'S VEHICLE MANUFACTURING ---- Naics Code:33992 Naics Description:SPORTING AND ATHLETIC GOODS MANUFACTURING ---- Handler Information ---- 48 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Date Received:19960901 Facility Name:AMF VOIT INC Classification:Small Quantity Generator ---- Date Received:19800818 Facility Name:AMF VOIT INC ---- Hazardous Waste Information ---- Violation/Evaluation Information ---- Evaluation Start Date:19860804 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description: Violation Determined Date: Actual Return to Compliance Date: Violation Responsible Agency: Enforcement Action Date: Enforcement Agency: Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description: Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Evaluation Start Date:19860829 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description:Generators - General Violation Determined Date:19860829 Actual Return to Compliance Date:19871201 Violation Responsible Agency:S Enforcement Action Date: Enforcement Agency: Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description: Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Evaluation Start Date:19870826 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description: Violation Determined Date: Actual Return to Compliance Date: Violation Responsible Agency: Enforcement Action Date: Enforcement Agency: Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description: Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Evaluation Start Date:19920311 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: Violation Determined Date: Actual Return to Compliance Date: Violation Responsible Agency: Enforcement Action Date: Enforcement Agency: 49 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description: Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Event ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA074LO Corrective Action Event Description:NCAPS RANKING/PRIORITY Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19881007 ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA050 Corrective Action Event Description:RFA COMPLETED Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19881007 ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA075LO Corrective Action Event Description:CA PRIORITIZATION-LOW CA PRIORITY Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19881007 ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA049PA Corrective Action Event Description:PA OR CERCLA INSPECTION Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19881007 ---- m-24-820298269-b 1 of 3 E 0.61 / 3,227.39 181.91 AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820298269-bb p1p-820298269-y1y Estor/EPA ID:CAD049901176 Site Code: Cleanup Status: Site Type:NON-OPERATING Potential Media Affected: Past Uses Caused Contam: APN: National Priorities List: Cleab up Oversight Agenci: Special Program: Funding: Acres: School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92666 Potential Contaminants: Site History: This facility manufactured sporting goods. Owner of the facility is JBL Enterprises. AMF Voit submitted Part A on 11/4/80. An ISD was granted 3/30/81. On 06/08/81, facility submitted a request for permit withdrawl. On 06/23/81, USEPA sent a letter to VOIT, stating they have reviewed the wihdrawl request they are returning documents VOIT submitted. This was the first permit withdrawl request approval. On 11/9/92, DTSC delisted the facility and stated that this facility did not operate as TSDF. Facility Information ---- 24 ENVIROSTOR 50 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Program Type:HAZ WASTE - RCRA Interim Status Permit Status:NON-OPERATING Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report.asp?global_id=CAD049901176 ---- Permit Units - Completed Act ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED Doc Link: Date:11/9/1992 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Doc Link: Date:6/8/1981 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Doc Link: Date:11/4/1980 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Units Undergoing Closure ---- Unit:NO PERMIT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS SITE Event Description: Doc Link: Date: Activity Type:Units Undergoing Closure - Completed Activities ---- m-24-820296386-b 2 of 3 E 0.61 / 3,227.39 181.91 AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296386-bb p1p-820296386-y1y Estor/EPA ID:80001403 Site Code: Cleanup Status:* COMPLETED AS OF 1/1/2008 Site Type:CORRECTIVE ACTION Potential Media Affected:NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses Caused Contam:NONE SPECIFIED APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:NONE SPECIFIED Special Program: Funding: Acres:0 ACRES School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92666 Potential Contaminants: Site History: This facility manufactured sporting goods. Owner of the facility is JBL Enterprises. AMF Voit submitted Part A on 11/4/80. An ISD was granted 3/30/81. On 06/08/81, facility submitted a request for permit withdrawl. On 06/23/81, USEPA sent a letter to VOIT, stating they have reviewed the wihdrawl request they are returning documents VOIT submitted. This was the first permit withdrawl request approval. On 11/9/92, DTSC delisted the facility and stated that this facility did not operate as TSDF. Facility Information ---- Program Type:CORRECTIVE ACTION 24 ENVIROSTOR 51 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Status:* COMPLETED Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=80001403 ---- Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:RCRA Facility Assessment Report Date Completed:10/7/1988 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:* CA Process is Terminated Date Completed:6/1/1988 Comments:A PA conducted. PA states NFA. Date of PA is listed as June 1988. Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Consent Order Date Completed:6/1/1988 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Preliminary Assessment Report Date Completed:6/1/1988 Comments:A PA conducted. PA states NFA. Date of PA is listed as June 1988. Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- m-24-820356897-b 3 of 3 E 0.61 / 3,227.39 181.91 AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA dd-HWP-820356897-bb p1p-820356897-y1y EPA ID:CAD049901176 Latitude:33.786431 Status:NON-OPERATING Longitude:-117.856435 Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Assembly District:68 Facility Size:Senate District:37 Team:Public Info Officer: Site Code:Public Part Speci: County:ORANGE Project Manager: Zip:926660000 Alias ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Alias Type:Envirostor ID Number Alias:30340005 ---- Completed Activities ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names: Event Description:New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Completed Date:06/08/1981 ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names: Event Description:New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED 24 HWP 52 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Completed Date:11/09/1992 ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names: Event Description:New Operating Permit - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Completed Date:11/04/1980 ---- m-25-820360875-b 1 of 1 E 0.61 / 3,242.57 183.37 AMF NEWPORT DIVERS 426 WEST ALMOND ORANGE CA 92667 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820360875-bb p1p-820360875-y1y Estor/EPA ID:30340005 Site Code: Cleanup Status:REFER: OTHER AGENCY AS OF 6/21/1988 Site Type:* HISTORICAL Potential Media Affected:NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses Caused Contam:NONE SPECIFIED APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:NONE SPECIFIED Special Program:* CERC2 Funding: Acres:NONE SPECIFIED School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92667 Potential Contaminants: CYANIDE (FREE) NICKEL UNCATEGORIZED: * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS, * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, * Metals - Other Inorganic Solid Waste, * UNSPECIFIED ACID SOLUTION, * UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES Site History: Facility Information ---- Program Type:HISTORICAL Status:REFER: OTHER AGENCY Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=30340005 ---- Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Site Screening Date Completed:10/26/1994 Comments:DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC. Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Preliminary Assessment Report Date Completed:6/30/1988 Comments:PRELIM ASSESS DONE NO FURTHER ACTION, NO GROUNDWATER OR SURFACEWATER CONTAMINATION Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: 25 ENVIROSTOR 53 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Document Type:Site Screening Date Completed:3/26/1987 Comments:DRIVE-BY REQUIRED SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: NEED ADDITIONAL INFO. Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:* Discovery Date Completed:9/6/1982 Comments:FACILITY IDENTIFIED I'D FROM ASP FILES Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- m-26-825116012-b 1 of 1 E 0.65 / 3,442.72 182.31 AMF VOIT INC 426 W ALMOND ORANGE CA 926660000 dd-RESPONSE-825116012-bb p1p-825116012-y1y ESTOR EPA ID:CAD049901176 Cleanup Status: Site Type:NON-OPERATING Site Code: National Priorities List: Acres: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: Special Program: Funding: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 County:ORANGE APN: Past Use that Caused Cntm: Potential Media Affected: POTENTIAL CONTM CONC: SITE HISTORY: This facility manufactured sporting goods. Owner of the facility is JBL Enterprises. AMF Voit submitted Part A on 11/4/80. An ISD was granted 3/30/81. On 06/08/81, facility submitted a request for permit withdrawl. On 06/23/81, USEPA sent a letter to VOIT, stating they have reviewed the wihdrawl request they are returning documents VOIT submitted. This was the first permit withdrawl request approval. On 11/9/92, DTSC delisted the facility and stated that this facility did not operate as TSDF. Facility Information ---- Program Type:HAZ WASTE - RCRA Interim Status Permit Status:NON-OPERATING Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report.asp?global_id=CAD049901176 ---- Permit Units - Completed Act ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED Doc Link: Date:11/9/1992 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Doc Link: Date:6/8/1981 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Doc Link: 26 RESPONSE 54 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Date:11/4/1980 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Units Undergoing Closure ---- Unit:NO PERMIT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS SITE Event Description: Doc Link: Date: Activity Type:Units Undergoing Closure - Completed Activities ---- m-27-820296821-b 1 of 1 N 0.68 / 3,579.64 155.96 STATEK CORP. 512 N. MAIN STREET ORANGE CA 92668 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296821-bb p1p-820296821-y1y Estor/EPA ID:71002448 Site Code: Cleanup Status:INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF Site Type:TIERED PERMIT Potential Media Affected:NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses Caused Contam:NONE SPECIFIED APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:NONE SPECIFIED Special Program: Funding: Acres:NONE SPECIFIED School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92668 Facility Information ---- Program Type:TIERED PERMIT Status:INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=71002448 ---- m-28-820294492-b 1 of 4 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 153.16 DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820294492-bb p1p-820294492-y1y Estor/EPA ID:CAD067625129 Site Code:400215 Cleanup Status: Site Type:CLOSED Potential Media Affected: Past Uses Caused Contam: APN: National Priorities List: Cleab up Oversight Agenci: Special Program: Funding: Acres: School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92668 Potential Contaminants: Site History: The facility is located at 1607 West Orange Grove in Orange. 27 28 ENVIROSTOR ENVIROSTOR 55 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB The facility obtained an Interim Status Document on January 4, 1982 for storage of plating shop hazardous waste, and operating a clarifier. Closure Plan was approved by DTSC on September 18, 1990, and the Closure Certification Report was approved on May 13, 1992. A RFA Questionnaire was submitted to DTSC on December 4, 1998. This facility has been transferred from Region 3 to Region 1 for conducting corrective action. It is on backlog for conducting an RFA. Facility Information ---- Program Type:HAZ WASTE - RCRA Status:CLOSED Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report.asp?global_id=CAD067625129 ---- Permit Units - Completed Act ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED Doc Link: Date:9/18/1990 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Doc Link: Date:9/15/1989 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - CALL-IN LETTER ISSUED Doc Link: Date:11/8/1988 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Units Undergoing Closure ---- Unit:MULTIPLE UNITS: BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2 Event Description:CLOSURE FINAL - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Doc Link: Date:5/13/1992 Activity Type:Units Undergoing Closure - Completed Activities ---- Unit:MULTIPLE UNITS: BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2 Event Description:CLOSURE FINAL - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATION Doc Link: Date:1/30/1992 Activity Type:Units Undergoing Closure - Completed Activities ---- m-28-820296822-b 2 of 4 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 153.16 STEVENS METAL FINISHING 1607 W. ORANGEGROVE AVENUE #D ORANGE CA 92668 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820296822-bb p1p-820296822-y1y Estor/EPA ID:71002672 Site Code:401053 Cleanup Status:NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 5/17/2002 Site Type:TIERED PERMIT Potential Media Affected:SOIL Past Uses Caused Contam:NONE SPECIFIED APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:NONE SPECIFIED Special Program: Funding: Acres:NONE SPECIFIED School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District: Zip:92668 28 ENVIROSTOR 56 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Potential Contaminants: CYANIDE (FREE) METALS: Cadmium and compounds, Chromium III, Copper and compounds, Nickel, Zinc Site History: Site History: The Stevens Metal Finishing (Facility) was located at 1607 West Orangegrove Avenue, Units D, E, and F, in the City of Orange, California. The property is located within a light industrial area of West Orange, on the north side of Orangegrove Avenue. The building which the Facility occupied is a single-story, concrete tilt-up multi unit structure. The Facility occupied the northern three units (D, E, & F) of the building. The total area of the three units is approximately 8,100 Square feet (sq.ft.). The Current Condition Report (CCR) dated September 25, 2002 indicated that the property was utilized for agricultural purposes prior to the development of the existing industrial complex. The business complex was developed in 1972. Three individuals operated this facility over a period of 18 years: Mr. Tony Stevens, Mr. Henry Hue Nguyen and Mr. Mike Do. Mr. Do acquired the ownership of the business from Mr. Nguyen in 1996. The Facility had operated a metal plating business at the site for18 years till it ceased the operation in late March, 2002. The chemicals used on the facility included corrosive aqueous solutions, cleaning solvents, and aqueous metal solutions. On November 27, 1996, Respondent submitted a Phase I Environmental Assessment (Phase I) identifying No Further Investigation. On May 6, 2002, the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) referred the Facility to DTSC due to elevated levels of contaminants encountered during the closure activities. On May 17, 2002, DTSC conducted a Phase I Site assessment Verification Inspection at the Facility and identified several Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) that will require Further Investigation. Previous investigations performed by Dilip Patel & Associates (DPA) determined that the elevated levels of metals (copper, chromium, zinc, nickel and cadmium) were present in the soil on the interior and the exterior side of the north wall. Elevated levels of Cyanide were also detected in the Plating Area. In association with the remedial action performed at this location, on February 13, 1997, OCHCA issued a letter to the Facility stating that "the presence of cadmium contamination beneath the storage area does not currently pose a threat to human health or the environment. In the event, however, that this contamination was to be removed from the site in the future, appropriate regulations should be consulted to determine whether the contamination is hazardous and addressed accordingly." The letter noted that Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board staff concurred that no further action is required at this time. The PBR Closure Report for the Facility and the CCR described about the existing degree and extent of contamination at the Plating Area. The issue is being investigated in the Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) for the site. On June 28, 2003, DTSC issued a Corrective Action Consent Agreement for conducting a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment at the Site. In accordance with the Consent Agreement Facility conducted an investigation at the site and subsequent to that a CCR dated September 24, 2002 was developed and submitted along with several pervious investigation reports as a PEA equivalent report. The CCR noted the following existing contamination at the Site: a) Trace concentrations of cyanide (0.5 to 0.9 ppm) present in the soil on northern side of the former clarifier B) Elevated levels of cadmium and zinc in the soil below the northern wall at a depth of approximately 2 to 4 feet. Based on the past investigations and the remedial action (limited removal action at the Plating Area along the north wall of the property) conducted at the site, the CCR concluded that there is low threat to human health and the environment and recommended no further action. Based on the review of the CCR, DTSC recommended for additional investigation to fulfill the requirements of a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) a Groundwater Contamination: Ground water has not been sampled at the site. There are no natural or man-made surface bodies of water on the SMF Facility. The Facility has no direct access to any surface bodies of water. There are no groundwater wells, including monitoring wells, at the Facility. The CCR noted that depth to Ground water data was obtained from the Orange County Water District (OCWD) for two wills (state well no. 04S/10W- 25H00; well site name YLFT_MW4 and state well no. 04S/10W-25; well site name YLFT MW6) that are located approximately one-mile west of the subject site. Ground water was measured at a depth of 89.71 feet on May 14, 2002 in Wll YLFT-MW4 and 84.05 feet in Well YLFT-MW6. Groundwater generally becomes deeper to the east of these wells. A ground water map from the OCWD (Groundwater Contour map Orange County Forebay, 2001), indicated that the depth to the first groundwater beneath the subject site is approximately 150 feet below the ground surface. There is no potential exists for the migtration of any detected contaminants in the site soil to the groundwater. Project Description: Corrective Action Oversight under a Consent Agreement Facility Information ---- Program Type:TIERED PERMIT Status:NO FURTHER ACTION Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=71002672 ---- Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:No Further Action Letter Date Completed:6/30/2006 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: 57 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Document Type:Corrective Action Completion Determination Date Completed:6/30/2006 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Interim Measures Implementation Report Date Completed:6/29/2006 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed:5/26/2006 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Interim Measures Workplan Date Completed:5/5/2006 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Date Completed:12/29/2005 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed:1/24/2005 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Oversight Date Completed:1/24/2005 Comments:Inspection report sent on 1/24/2005 Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Supplemental Site Investigation Workplan Date Completed:12/22/2004 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Oversight Date Completed:2/19/2004 Comments:Inspection report sent on 2/19/2004 Activity Type:Completed Activities 58 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed:2/19/2004 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Workplan Date Completed:1/27/2004 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Phase I Verification Date Completed:10/11/2002 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Phase 1 Date Completed:10/10/2002 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Date Completed:7/11/2002 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Workplan Date Completed:7/5/2002 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Consent Agreement Date Completed:6/28/2002 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Phase 1 Date Completed:5/17/2002 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- 59 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB m-28-820359765-b 3 of 4 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 153.16 DATA CIRCUITS INC. 1607 WEST ORANGEGROVE, SUITE A ORANGE CA 92667 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820359765-bb p1p-820359765-y1y Estor/EPA ID:30360005 Site Code:400215 Cleanup Status:REFER: RCRA AS OF 5/10/1995 Site Type:* HISTORICAL Potential Media Affected:NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses Caused Contam:NONE SPECIFIED APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:NONE SPECIFIED Special Program: Funding: Acres:NONE SPECIFIED School District: Assembly District: Senate District: Zip:92667 Potential Contaminants: ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS ALKALINE SOLUTION 2<ph font="" metal Site History: Facility Information ---- Program Type:HISTORICAL Status:REFER: RCRA Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=30360005 ---- Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Site Screening Date Completed:2/9/1995 Comments:NFA FOR SITE MITIGATION OPERATIONS, THIS IS A RCRA FACILITY. Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:* Discovery Date Completed:9/3/1982 Comments:FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID FROM ASP FILES Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- m-28-810473628-b 4 of 4 N 0.71 / 3,741.21 153.16 DATA CIRCUITS INC 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE A ORANGE CA 92868 dd-RCRA CORRACTS-810473628-bb p1p-810473628-y1y County Code:CA059 County Name:ORANGE EPA Handler ID:CAD067625129 Current Site Name:DATA CIRCUITS INC Generator Status Universe:Small Quantity Generator Land Type: Activity Location:CA TSD Activity:Yes 28 28 ENVIROSTOR RCRA CORRACTS 60 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Mixed Waste Generator:No Importer Activity:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Recycler Activity:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Inject Activity:No Rece Waste From Off Site:No Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Mailing Address:1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE A, , ORANGE, CA, 92668, Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Email: Location Street 2: ---- Owner/Operator Information ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CP Owner/Operator Name:DATA CIRCUITS INC Owner/Operator Address: 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE A ORANGE CA 92668 Owner/Operator Phone:7149972471 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- Owner/Operator Indicator:CO Owner/Operator Name:DATA CIRCUITS INC Owner/Operator Address: 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE A ORANGE CA 92668 Owner/Operator Phone:7149972471 Owner/Operator Type:P Date Became Current: Date Ended Current: ---- NAICS Information ---- Naics Code:334412 Naics Description:BARE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING ---- Naics Code:334419 Naics Description:OTHER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT MANUFACTURING ---- Naics Code:334417 Naics Description:ELECTRONIC CONNECTOR MANUFACTURING ---- Handler Information ---- Date Received:19910403 Facility Name:DATA CIRCUITS Classification:Large Quantity Generator ---- Date Received:19960901 Facility Name:DATA CIRCUITS INC Classification:Small Quantity Generator ---- Date Received:19801007 Facility Name:DATA CIRCUITS INC Classification:Large Quantity Generator ---- Hazardous Waste Information ---- 61 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Violation/Evaluation Information ---- Evaluation Start Date:19880801 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description:TSD - Financial Requirements Violation Determined Date:19880801 Actual Return to Compliance Date:19881014 Violation Responsible Agency:S Enforcement Action Date:19880916 Enforcement Agency:S Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description:WRITTEN INFORMAL Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Evaluation Start Date:19880801 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description:TSD - Financial Requirements Violation Determined Date:19880801 Actual Return to Compliance Date:19881014 Violation Responsible Agency:S Enforcement Action Date: Enforcement Agency: Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description: Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Evaluation Start Date:19880801 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description:TSD - General Violation Determined Date:19880801 Actual Return to Compliance Date:19881014 Violation Responsible Agency:S Enforcement Action Date:19880825 Enforcement Agency:S Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description:WRITTEN INFORMAL Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Evaluation Start Date:19880801 Evaluation Agency:S Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description:LDR - General Violation Determined Date:19880801 Actual Return to Compliance Date:19881014 Violation Responsible Agency:S Enforcement Action Date:19890705 Enforcement Agency:E Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description:WRITTEN INFORMAL Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Evaluation Start Date:19880801 Evaluation Agency:S 62 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description:TSD - Closure/Post-Closure Violation Determined Date:19880801 Actual Return to Compliance Date:19881014 Violation Responsible Agency:S Enforcement Action Date:19880825 Enforcement Agency:S Disposition Status Date: Disposition Status: Enforcement Type Description:WRITTEN INFORMAL Proposed Penalty Amount: Paid Amount: Final Amount: ---- Event ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA074ME Corrective Action Event Description:NCAPS RANKING/PRIORITY Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19910328 ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA03192 Corrective Action Event Description:REEVALUATE IN FY Original Schedule Date of Event:19921001 New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event: ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA075ME Corrective Action Event Description:CA PRIORITIZATION-MEDIUM CA PRIORITY Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19910328 ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA029ST Corrective Action Event Description:LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19910328 ---- Corrective Action Event Code:CA049PA Corrective Action Event Description:PA OR CERCLA INSPECTION Original Schedule Date of Event: New Schedule Date of Event: Actual Date of Event:19910328 ---- m-29-820297943-b 1 of 3 N 0.75 / 3,978.64 155.27 DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820297943-bb p1p-820297943-y1y Estor/EPA ID:80001460 Site Code:400215 Cleanup Status:ACTIVE AS OF 6/12/2012 Site Type:CORRECTIVE ACTION Potential Media Affected:UNDER INVESTIGATION Past Uses Caused Contam:MANUFACTURING - ELECTRONIC, RESEARCH - OTHER APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM Special Program: Funding: Acres:1 ACRES School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92668 29 ENVIROSTOR 63 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Potential Contaminants: METALS: Copper and compounds, Lead POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) UNDER INVESTIGATION VOLATILE ORGANICS (8260B VOCS): 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, 1,1-Dichloroethane, 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB), Chlorobenzene Site History: The facility is located at 1607 West Orange Grove in Orange. The facility obtained an Interim Status Document on January 4, 1982 for storage of plating shop hazardous waste, and operating a clarifier. Closure Plan was approved by DTSC on September 18, 1990, and the Closure Certification Report was approved on May 13, 1992. A RFA Questionnaire was submitted to DTSC on December 4, 1998. This facility has been transferred from Region 4 to Region 1 for conducting corrective action. It is on backlog for conducting an RFA. The Data Circuits site is located at 1607 Vest Orange Avenue, in Orange, Orange County, California. (Township 4 South, Range 9 Vest, Section 30, San Bernardino Base Line and Heridian; Latitude: 33 0 47' 21"; Longitude: 117 0 52' 06"). The site covers approximately 1 acre in a light industrial area . Operations on site include film developing; circuit board etching, plating, and fabrication research and development; and on-site treatment of spent plating baths and rinsewater. The site is owned by Tri-Co Realty. Data Circuits has leased the property since 1973 vhen they began operations. Prior to 1973, the property was an orange grove . The site consists of one building which houses offices and the process equipment, an outdoor hazardous waste storage area, and a waste treatment area. Historically, Data Circuits manufactures printed circuit boards via a multi - step process. Raw copper/resin sandwich boards are initally coated with a design polymer and etched to remove the copper from within the design. This etchant contains a combination of ammonium hydroxide and ammonium chloride; it was emptied from the process line containers every 2 to 3 days into a 1,500-gallon collection/treatment tank. The etched boards are then scrubbed in a 5 percent hydrochloric acid bath and rinsed , and then dipped in a cuprous oxide bath prior to thermal lamination. This cuprous oxide is also emptied into the 1,500-gallon collection/ treatment tank periodically. After lamination, sandwiched plates are sent to an electroless copper plating line where they are treated in the following bath series: detergent cleaner, rinse, ammonium persulfate, rinse, palladium catalyst, rinse, tin stripper/accelerator, and electroless copper bath. In time, all these materials lose their effectiveness and are periodically emptied to the 1,500-gallon collection/treatment tank. After electroless plating, the copper-coated plates are subjected to a photographic development sequence. The plates are then brought back to the plating area for additional etching. After this etching, they are dipped in a copper sulphenate solution, placed in electroplating liquid, and the finished in a stannous acid/fluorboric acid bath. Manufacturing processes on site did not changed since the facility began operating in 1973. The primary difference in operations is related to the treatment of waste on site. In August 1988 a waste treatment system was installed and operated until 1991. The waste treatment system consists of tvo identical treatment systems, each utilizing a 250-gal10n batch treatment tank and a 250-gal10n decant tank sharing a common filte r press. One system treats waste streams consisting of copper while the other treats waste streams from all other processes on site. The new treatment system also uses an ozone generation/waste treatment system to further eliminate copper, tin, and lead from the process wastewaters. April 30, 1991, USEPA, via Ecology and Environmental Inc, completed a Preliminary Assessment (March 29, 1991) of the facility. May 13, 1992, DTSC approved the closure certification. December 4, 1998, DTSC received a response from TRICO Realty, Inc., the property owners, regarding a RCRA Facility Assessment Questionnaire sent by DTSC Region 4 Office. Facility Information ---- Program Type:CORRECTIVE ACTION Status:ACTIVE Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=80001460 ---- Completed Activities ---- Doc Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2.asp?global_id=80001460&doc_id=6029381 Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:FAST Review Checklist Date Completed:1/20/2010 Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- Doc Link: Area Name: Sub Area: Document Type:Preliminary Assessment Report Date Completed:3/28/1991 64 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Comments: Activity Type:Completed Activities ---- m-29-820356573-b 2 of 3 N 0.75 / 3,978.64 155.27 DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA dd-HWP-820356573-bb p1p-820356573-y1y EPA ID:CAD067625129 Latitude:33.796732 Status:CLOSED Longitude:-117.868909 Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Assembly District:68 Facility Size:Senate District:37 Team:Public Info Officer: Site Code:400215 Public Part Speci: County:ORANGE Project Manager: Zip:926680000 Alias ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Alias Type:Envirostor ID Number Alias:30360005 ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Alias Type:Project Code (Site Code) Alias:400215 ---- Completed Activities ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names: Event Description:New Operating Permit - CALL-IN LETTER ISSUED Completed Date:11/08/1988 ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names: Event Description:New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED Completed Date:09/18/1990 ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names: Event Description:New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Completed Date:09/15/1989 ---- Undergoing Closure ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names:BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2 Event Description:Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Completed Date:05/13/1992 ---- Facility Type:Historical - Non-Operating Unit Names:BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2 Event Description:Closure Final - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATION Completed Date:01/30/1992 ---- m-29-825115882-b 3 of 3 N 0.75 / 3,978.64 155.27 DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE ORANGE CA 926680000 dd-RESPONSE-825115882-bb p1p-825115882-y1y ESTOR EPA ID:CAD067625129 Cleanup Status: Site Type:CLOSED Site Code:400215 National Priorities List: 29 29 HWP RESPONSE 65 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Acres: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: Special Program: Funding: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 County:ORANGE APN: Past Use that Caused Cntm: Potential Media Affected: POTENTIAL CONTM CONC: SITE HISTORY: The facility is located at 1607 West Orange Grove in Orange. The facility obtained an Interim Status Document on January 4, 1982 for storage of plating shop hazardous waste, and operating a clarifier. Closure Plan was approved by DTSC on September 18, 1990, and the Closure Certification Report was approved on May 13, 1992. A RFA Questionnaire was submitted to DTSC on December 4, 1998. This facility has been transferred from Region 3 to Region 1 for conducting corrective action. It is on backlog for conducting an RFA. Facility Information ---- Program Type:HAZ WASTE - RCRA Status:CLOSED Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report.asp?global_id=CAD067625129 ---- Permit Units - Completed Act ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED Doc Link: Date:9/18/1990 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVED Doc Link: Date:9/15/1989 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Unit: Event Description:NEW OPERATING PERMIT - CALL-IN LETTER ISSUED Doc Link: Date:11/8/1988 Activity Type:Permitted Units - Completed Activities ---- Units Undergoing Closure ---- Unit:MULTIPLE UNITS: BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2 Event Description:CLOSURE FINAL - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Doc Link: Date:5/13/1992 Activity Type:Units Undergoing Closure - Completed Activities ---- Unit:MULTIPLE UNITS: BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2 Event Description:CLOSURE FINAL - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATION Doc Link: Date:1/30/1992 Activity Type:Units Undergoing Closure - Completed Activities ---- m-30-820298067-b 1 of 1 NNE 0.96 / 5,074.91 172.07 INDEPENDENT FORGE CO. 692 N. BATAVIA ORANGE CA 92665 dd-ENVIROSTOR-820298067-bb p1p-820298067-y1y Estor/EPA ID:71002881 30 ENVIROSTOR 66 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev (ft) Site DB Site Code: Cleanup Status:INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF Site Type:TIERED PERMIT Potential Media Affected:NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses Caused Contam:NONE SPECIFIED APN:NONE SPECIFIED National Priorities List:NO Cleab up Oversight Agenci:NONE SPECIFIED Special Program: Funding: Acres:NONE SPECIFIED School District: Assembly District:68 Senate District:37 Zip:92665 Facility Information ---- Program Type:TIERED PERMIT Status:INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION Summary Link:http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=71002881 ---- 67 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Unplottable Summary Total: 1 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Name Address City Zip ERIS ID uu-HMIRS-818148781-aa N MAIN ST ORANGE CA 818148781HMIRS Unplottable Summary 68 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Unplottable Report Site: N MAIN ST ORANGE CA uu-HMIRS-818148781-bb Report No:I-1997121275 Fd DOT Rep No: NRC No:Incident Cnty:ORANGE Date of Incident:12/11/1997 Incident Occrrnce: Time of Incident:0500 Fed DOT Agency Name: Report Type:A hazardous material incident Description of Events:WHILE MOVING PALLET CHECKER DAMAGED ONE DRUM WITH FORKLIFT BLADE. THE DRUM LEAKED APPROXIMATELY 1 POUND OF SOLID MATERIAL. ALL SPILLAGE WAS CLEANED USING PROTECTIVE CLOTHING AND SHOVEL. Recom Actions Taken: Carrier Information ---- Name:ROADWAY EXPRESS INC. Street Name:557 E TALLMADGE AVE City:AKRON State:OH Postal Code:44310-2402 Non US State: Country:US Fed Dot ID:71821 Hazmat Reg ID: Mode of Transportation:Highway Transportation Phase:N/A ---- Contact Information ---- Name:SUSAN CAMARA Title:HAZMAT SPECIALIST Business Name: Street: City: State: Postal Code: Non US State: Country:US ---- Detail Information ---- Commodity Name:CORROSIVE SOLIDS N.O.S. Technical Trade Name:ETHANOLAMINE Identification Number:UN1759 Hazardous Class Code:8 Hazardous Class:CORROSIVE MATERIAL Quantity Released:1 Unit of Measure:SLB Hazmat Waste Indicator:No Hazmat Waste EPA Number: HMIS Toxic by Inhalation Ind:No TIH Hazard Zone: Failure Cause Description: Spillage Result Ind:Yes Fire Result Ind:No Explosion Result Ind:No Water Sewer Result Ind:No Gas Dispersion Result Ind:No Environ Damage Result:No No Release Result Ind:No HMIRS Unplottable Report 69 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Fire EMS Report Ind:No Fire EMS Report No: Police Report Ind:No Police Report No: In House Cleanup Ind:No Other Cleanup Ind:No Damage More Than 500:No Property Damage:0 Remediation Cleanup Cost:175 Total Hazmat Fatalities:0 Total Hazmat Injuries:0 Total Evacuated:0 ---- 70 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List:rr-NPL-bb National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2016 National Priority List - Proposed:rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2016 Deleted NPL:rr-DELETED NPL-bb The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2016 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory:rr-SEMS-bb The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date: Aug 5, 2016 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites:rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date: Aug 5, 2016 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS: rr-CERCLIS-bb Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS Appendix: Database Descriptions 71 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned:rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens:rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action:rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Sep 6, 2016 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities:rr-RCRA TSD-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Government Publication Date: Sep 6, 2016 RCRA Generator List:rr-RCRA LQG-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Sep 6, 2016 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA SQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Sep 6, 2016 RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA CESQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Sep 6, 2016 RCRA Non-Generators:rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Sep 6, 2016 CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN 72 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs:rr-FED ENG-bb Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jul 30, 2014 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs:rr-FED INST-bb Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date: Jul 30, 2014 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Oct 7, 2015 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database:rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jul 14, 2016 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing:rr-FEMA UST-bb The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Apr 19, 2016 State State Response Sites:rr-RESPONSE-bb A list of identified confirmed release sites where the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. This database is state equivalent NPL. Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2016 EnviroStor Database:rr-ENVIROSTOR-bb The EnviroStor Data Management System is made available by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Includes Corrective Action sites, Tiered Permit sites, Historical Sites and Evaluation/Investigation sites. This database is state equivalent CERCLIS. Government Publication Date: Aug 22, 2016 FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST RESPONSE ENVIROSTOR 73 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Solid Waste Information System (SWIS):rr-SWF/LF-bb The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database made available by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) contains information on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the State of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites. Government Publication Date: Sep 30, 2016 EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities:rr-HWP-bb A list of hazardous waste facilities including permitted, post-closure and historical facilities found in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database. Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 Land Disposal Sites:rr-LDS-bb Land Disposal Sites in GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s data management system. The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills. Government Publication Date: Aug 24, 2016 Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports:rr-LUST-bb List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks within the Cleanup Sites data in GeoTracker database. GeoTracker is the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup (Underground Storage Tanks, Department of Defense and Site Cleanup Program) as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks. The Leak Prevention Program that overlooks LUST sites is the SWRCB in California's Environmental Protection Agency. Government Publication Date: Aug 25, 2016 Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DLST-bb List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup sites removed from GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s database system, as well as sites removed from the SWRCB's list of UST Case closures. Government Publication Date: Aug 25, 2016 Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker:rr-UST-bb List of Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 Aboveground Storage Tanks:rr-AST-bb A statewide list from 2009 of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) made available by the Cal FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM). This list is no longer maintained or updated by the Cal FIRE OSFM. Government Publication Date: Aug 31, 2009 Delisted Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED TNK-bb This database contains a list of storage tank sites that were removed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cal FIRE Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM). Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank Cases:rr-UST CLOSURE-bb List of UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director that have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. Government Publication Date: Jul 07, 2016 Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database:rr-HHSS-bb The Historical Hazardous Substance Storage database contains information collected in the 1980s from facilities that stored hazardous substances. The information was originally collected on paper forms, was later transferred to microfiche, and recently indexed as a searchable database. When using this database, please be aware that it is based upon self-reported information submitted by facilities which has not been independently verified. It is unlikely that every facility responded to the survey and the database should not be expected to be a complete inventory of all facilities that were operating at that time. This database is maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker. Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2015 SWF/LF HWP LDS LUST DLST UST AST DELISTED TNK UST CLOSURE HHSS 74 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Land Use Restrictions:rr-LUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents land use restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple land use restrictions. Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restrictions:rr-HLUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Government Publication Date: Sep 27, 2016 Deed Restrictions and Land Use Restrictions:rr-DEED-bb List of Deed Restrictions, Land Use Restrictions and Covenants in GeoTracker made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency. A deed restriction (land use covenant) may be required to facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to residual hazardous materials. Government Publication Date: Aug 11, 2016 Voluntary Cleanup Program:rr-VCP-bb List of sites in the Voluntary Cleanup Program made available by the Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). The Voluntary Cleanup Program was designed to respond to lower priority sites. Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, DTSC enters site-specific agreements with project proponents for DTSC oversight of site assessment, investigation, and/or removal or remediation activities, and the project proponents agree to pay DTSC's reasonable costs for those services. Government Publication Date: Oct 3, 2016 GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data:rr-CLEANUP SITES-bb A list of cleanup sites in the state of California made available by The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). SWRCB tracks leaking underground storage tank cleanups as well as other water board cleanups. Government Publication Date: Aug 25, 2016 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN LUST-bb LUSTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2016 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN UST-bb USTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2016 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED ILST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2016 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED IUST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2016 County Alpine County CUPA List:rr-ALPINE CUPA-bb The Alpine County Health Department has been certified by Cal / EPA to implement the Unified program and maintains a list of Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) facilities. LUR HLUR DEED VCP CLEANUP SITES INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST ALPINE CUPA 75 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Government Publication Date: Feb 24, 2015 Amador County CUPA List:rr-AMADOR CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Amador County. This list is made available by Amador County Environmental Health Department which is the CUPA for Amador County and administers a consolidated hazardous materials program. Government Publication Date: Aug 22, 2016 Los Angeles County - Santa Monica City Aboveground Storage Tank List:rr-ASTS-bb A list of all registered Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) in the City of Santa Monica of Los Angeles County. The list is made available by Santa Monica Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Aug 01, 2016 Alameda County UST List:rr-ALAMEDA UST-bb A list of all registered Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) in the County of Alameda. The list is made available by Alameda County Department of Environmental Health. Government Publication Date: Sep 9, 2016 Alameda County LOP Sites List:rr-ALAMEDA LOP-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) facilities in Alameda County. This list is made available by Alameda County Department of Environmental Health (ACEH). ACEH implements a Local Oversight Program (LOP) under contract with the State Water Resources Control Board to provide regulatory oversight of the investigation and cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination from leaking petroleum USTs. Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2016 City of Berkeley CUPA Facilities:rr-BERKELEY CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs at the City of Berkeley in Alameda County. This list is maintained by the Toxics Management Division at the City of Berkeley. Government Publication Date: Jul 21, 2016 City of Bakersfield CUPA List:rr-BKRSFIELD CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the City of Bakersfield. This list is made available by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Jul 29, 2016 Los Angeles County - Burbank City CUPA List:rr-BURBANK CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the City of Burbank. This list is made available by the City of Burbank Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Aug 09, 2016 Butte County CUPA List:rr-BUTTE CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Butte County. This list is made available by Butte County Public Health Department, Environmental Health Division which was certified by the California Environmental Protection Agency as the CUPA for Butte County. Government Publication Date: Jul 01, 2016 Calaveras County CUPA Facilities List:rr-CALAVERAS CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the County of Calaveras. This list is made available by Calaveras County Environmental Health Department which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA. Government Publication Date: Jun 21, 2016 Calaveras County Landfills List:rr-CALAVERAS LF-bb A list of landfills in Calaveras County. This list is made available by Calaveras County Environmental Health Department which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Jun 21, 2016 Calaveras County UST Remediation Sites:rr-CALAVERAS LUST-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities in Calaveras County. This list is made available by Calaveras County Environmental Health Department. Local Implementing Agency (LIA) provides oversight of site remediation with soil contamination while CalEPA - California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region oversees remediation of sites with groundwater contamination. AMADOR CUPA ASTS ALAMEDA UST ALAMEDA LOP BERKELEY CUPA BKRSFIELD CUPA BURBANK CUPA BUTTE CUPA CALAVERAS CUPA CALAVERAS LF CALAVERAS LUST 76 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Government Publication Date: Jun 20, 2016 Calaveras County Underground Storage Tanks List:rr-CALAVERAS UST-bb A list of Underground Storage Tanks (UST) in Calaveras County provided by the Calaveras County Environmental Health Department. Government Publication Date: Aug 16, 2016 Colusa County CUPA List:rr-COLUSA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with Business Plan and Hazardous Generator programs in the County of Colusa. This list is made available by Colusa County Environmental Health which was certified by the California Environmental Protection Agency as Certified Unified Program Agency for Colusa County. Government Publication Date: Jan 26, 2016 Contra Costa County CUPA List:rr-CONTRACO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the County of Contra Costa. This list is made available by Contra Costa County which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA. Government Publication Date: Jul 21, 2016 Union City CUPA Facilities:rr-UCUP-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the City of Union. This list is made available by the City of Union Economic and Community Development Department. Government Publication Date: Aug 3, 2016 Del Norte County CUPA Facility List:rr-DELNORTE CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Del Norte County. This list is made available by Del Norte County Environmental Health Division which is the designated CUPA for the county. Government Publication Date: Jul 21, 2016 El Dorado County CUPA Facility List:rr-ELDORADO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in El Dorado County. This list is made available by El Dorado County Department of Environmental Management - Hazardous Waste Division which is approved by CalEPA as CUPA for El Dorado County. Government Publication Date: Oct 7, 2016 Los Angeles County - El Segundo City Underground Storage Tanks List:rr-ELSEGUNDO UST-bb A list of all registered Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) in the City of El Segundo of Los Angeles County. The list is made available by El Segundo City Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Aug 25,2016 Fresno County CUPA/Solid Waste Programs Resource List:rr-FRESNO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Fresno County. This list is made available by Fresno County Department of Environmental Health Division which is approved by Cal-EPA as CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Jul 13, 2016 Glenn County CUPA List:rr-GLENN CUPA-bb The Glenn County Air Pollution Control District is the Administering Agency and the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for Glenn County with responsibility for regulating hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, underground storage tank facilities, above ground storage tanks, and stationary sources handling regulated substances. Government Publication Date: Aug 02, 2016 Hayward City CUPA List:rr-HAYWARD CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Hayward City. This list is maintained by the Hayward City Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Aug 04, 2016 Humboldt County CUPA Facility List:rr-HUMBOLDT CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Humboldt County. This list is made available by Humboldt County Division of Environmental Health which is approved by the State Secretary for Environmental Protection as CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Sep 06, 2016 CALAVERAS UST COLUSA CUPA CONTRACO CUPA UCUP DELNORTE CUPA ELDORADO CUPA ELSEGUNDO UST FRESNO CUPA GLENN CUPA HAYWARD CUPA HUMBOLDT CUPA 77 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Los Angeles County - Santa Monica City Hazardous Waste Facilities:rr-HWFS-bb A list of Hazardous Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County, City of Santa Monica. This list is made available by Santa Monica Fire Prevention Division. Government Publication Date: Aug 01, 2016 Los Angeles County - Santa Monica City Hazardous Materials Facilities:rr-HWMS-bb A list of Hazardous Materials Facilities in the City of Santa Monica, Los Angeles county. This list is made available by Santa Monica Fire Prevention Division which has been designated as the CUPA for the City. Government Publication Date: Aug 01, 2016 Imperial County CUPA Facility List:rr-IMPERIAL CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Imperial County. This list is made available by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) which is appointed as CUPA for Imperial County. Government Publication Date: Jul 19, 2016 Inyo County CUPA Facility List:rr-INYO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the County of Inyo. This list is made available by the Inyo County Environmental Health Services Department which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 13, 2016 Kern County CUPA List:rr-KERN CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the County of Kern. This list is made available by Kern County Environmental Health Services Department which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA for Kern County. Government Publication Date: May 20, 2016 Kern County UST List:rr-KERN UST-bb A list of all registered and inactive Underground Storage Tanks in the County of Kern. The list is made available by Kern County Environmental Health Division. Government Publication Date: May 17, 2016 Kings County CUPA Facility List:rr-KINGS CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Kings County. This list is made available by Kings County Department of Public Health which is appointed as CUPA for the county. Government Publication Date: Jul 25, 2016 Los Angeles County HMS List:rr-LA HMS-bb This list contains sites that have or had permits for Industrial Waste, Underground Storage Tanks, or Storm water in the County of Los Angeles. This list is made available by the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Government Publication Date: Aug 16, 2016 Los Angeles County Long Beach UST List:rr-LA LONGB UST-bb A list of all registered active Underground Storage Tanks in the City of Long Beach of Los Angeles County. The list is made available by Long Beach Certified Unified Program Agency. Government Publication Date: Aug 24, 2016 Los Angeles County Solid Waste Sites:rr-LA SWF-bb List of permitted solid waste facilities, closed landfills, historical dumpsites and other solid waste sites in Los Angeles County, made available by the Department of Public Works in Los Angeles County. Government Publication Date: Oct 12, 2016 Lake County CUPA Facility List:rr-LAKE CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Lake County. This list is made available by Lake County Division of Environmental Health which is CUPA for the entire county. Government Publication Date: Aug 15, 2016 Lassen County CUPA List:rr-LASSEN CUPA-bb The Environmental Health Program of Lassen County tracks Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA) facilities. HWFS HWMS IMPERIAL CUPA INYO CUPA KERN CUPA KERN UST KINGS CUPA LA HMS LA LONGB UST LA SWF LAKE CUPA LASSEN CUPA 78 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2016 Madera County CUPA Facility List:rr-MADERA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Madera County. This list is made available by Madera County Environmental Health Department which is CUPA for the entire county. Government Publication Date: Sep 06, 2016 Marin County CUPA List:rr-MARIN CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the County of Marin. This list is made available by Marin County which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA. Government Publication Date: Jul 28, 2016 Mariposa County CUPA List:rr-MARIPOSA CUPA-bb Mariposa County Health Department, Environmental Health Services, is certified by Cal-EPA as the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) that administers specific hazardous materials/hazardous waste programs. Government Publication Date: Jun 23, 2016 Mendocino County CUPA Facilities List:rr-MENDOCINO CUPA-bb A list of Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) facilities in Mendocino County. This list is made available by the Mendocino County Environmental Health Division. Government Publication Date: Jul 19, 2016 Merced County CUPA Facilities List:rr-MERCED CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the County of Merced. This list is made available by Merced County which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA for the entire county. Government Publication Date: Jul 16, 2016 Mono County CUPA Facility List:rr-MONO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Mono County. This list is made available by Mono County Environmental Health Department which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA for the entire county. Government Publication Date: Sep 12, 2016 Monterey County CUPA Facility List:rr-MONTEREY CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Monterey County. This list is made available by Monterey County Hazardous Materials Management Services which is designated as the CUPA in Monterey County. Government Publication Date: Aug 05, 2016 Napa County LOP Site List:rr-NAPA LOP-bb A list of Local Oversight Program (LOP) sites (leaking underground storage tanks) in Napa County. This list is maintained by the Napa County Environmental Health Division Government Publication Date: Jul 21, 2016 Napa County UST List:rr-NAPA UST-bb A list of all registered active Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) in the County of Napa. This list is made available by Napa County Environmental Health Division. Government Publication Date: Mar 09, 2016 Nevada County CUPA Facility List:rr-NEVADA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Nevada County. This list is made available by Nevada County Department of Environmental Health which is the CUPA for all cities and unincorporated areas within Nevada County. Government Publication Date: Jul 25, 2016 Orange County Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Listing:rr-ORANGE AST-bb A list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank (APST) facilities inspected by Orange County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA). This list is made available by the Environmental Health Division of Orange County Health Care Agency. Government Publication Date: Sep 16, 2016 MADERA CUPA MARIN CUPA MARIPOSA CUPA MENDOCINO CUPA MERCED CUPA MONO CUPA MONTEREY CUPA NAPA LOP NAPA UST NEVADA CUPA ORANGE AST 79 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Orange County Underground Storage Tanks Listing:rr-ORANGE UST-bb A list of registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Orange County. This list is made available by Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA), Environmental Health Division which oversees the underground storage tank inspection program in most of the cities of Orange County, with the exception of Anaheim, Fullerton, and Orange. Government Publication Date: Sep 01, 2016 Ventura County City of Oxnard CUPA Facility List:rr-OXNARD CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Oxnard City. This list is made available by Oxnard City Fire Department which is the CUPA for Oxnard City in Ventura County. Government Publication Date: Oct 05, 2016 Placer County CUPA Facilities List:rr-PLACER CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Placer County. This list is made available by Placer County Environmental Health which is designated CUPA for all areas of the county except for the City of Roseville. Government Publication Date: Jul 28, 2016 Plumas County CUPA List:rr-PLUMAS CUPA-bb In Plumas County, the Environmental Health Department is the designated Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) that consolidates and coordinates administrative activities such as permits, inspections, and enforcement. CUPA Programs include Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP), Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGTs), Hazardous Waste Generators (HWG) and CAL-ARP. Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2016 Riverside County Local Oversight Program List:rr-RIVERSIDE LOP-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities in Riverside County. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. Environmental Cleanup Program provides oversight of assessments and cleanups at properties that have been, or may have been, contaminated with hazardous substances from LUSTs or releases associated with other commercial/industrial use. Government Publication Date: Sep 07, 2016 Riverside County Underground Storage Tanks List:rr-RIVERSIDE UST-bb A list of registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Riverside County. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. The Hazardous Materials Management Branch (HMMB) regulates and oversees the inspections of constructions, repairs, upgrades, system operation and removal of UST systems. Government Publication Date: Sep 07, 2016 City of Roseville CUPA Facilities:rr-ROSEVILLE CUPA-bb List of CUPA facilities for the City of Roseville, California. Maintained by the Roseville City Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Jul 27, 2016 Sacramento County Master Hazardous Materials Facility List:rr-SACRAMENTO HAZ-bb A list of Hazardous Materials Facilities in Sacramento County. This list is made available by Sacramento County Environmental Management Department which has been designated as the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the County. Government Publication Date: May 02, 2016 Sacramento Toxic Site Cleanup List:rr-SACRAMENTO TOX-bb Sacramento County Environmental Management Department (EMD)'s Toxic Site Cleanup List includes sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. The EMD's Site Assessment & Mitigation Program, also referred to as Toxic Site Cleanup Program, provides mandated regulatory oversight of the assessment and remediation of properties on which there has been a release of hazardous materials to soil and/or groundwater. Government Publication Date: Aug 22, 2016 San Benito CUPA List:rr-SAN BENITO CUPA-bb The San Benito County Environmental Health Department maintains a list of all Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) facilities. Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2016 City of San Jose Hazardous Material Facilities:rr-SAN JOSE HM-bb A list of facilities with hazardous materials, including underground and aboveground tanks. This list is maintained by the City of San Jose Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2016 ORANGE UST OXNARD CUPA PLACER CUPA PLUMAS CUPA RIVERSIDE LOP RIVERSIDE UST ROSEVILLE CUPA SACRAMENTO HAZ SACRAMENTO TOX SAN BENITO CUPA SAN JOSE HM 80 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 San Leandro City CUPA Facilities List:rr-SAN LEANDRO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in San Leandro City, Alameda County. This list is made available by San Leandro City Environmental Services Section. Government Publication Date: Aug 17, 2016 San Bernardino County CUPA List:rr-SANBERN CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in San Bernardino County. This list is made available by San Bernardino County Fire Department which is the CUPA for all areas of the County except the city of Victorville. Government Publication Date: Jul 25, 2016 San Diego County Hazardous Materials Management Division Database:rr-SANDIEGO HAZ-bb A list of facilities with Unified Program Facility Permit in San Diego County. This list has been made available by County of San Diego Environmental Health. Government Publication Date: Sep 09, 2016 San Diego County Site Assessment and Mitigation Investigation Sites:rr-SANDIEGO SAM-bb List of sites which have undergone a Site Assessment and Mitigation investigation. This list is made available by the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health. Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 San Diego County Solid Waste Facility List:rr-SANDIEGO SWF-bb A list of open and closed Solid Waste Facilities in the County of San Diego. The list is made available by San Diego County Department of Environmental Health. Government Publication Date: Aug 12, 2016 San Diego County UST List:rr-SANDIEGO UST-bb A list of registered Underground Storage Tanks in the County of San Diego. The list is made available by the San Diego County Hazardous Materials Division. Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2016 San Francisco County Aboveground Storage Tanks List:rr-SANFRAN AST-bb A list of Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) facilities inspected by San Francisco Department of Public Health's (SFDPH) Hazardous Materials and Waste Program. Aboveground storage containers or tanks include oil-filled equipment (such as hydraulic systems/reservoirs and heat transfer systems) which have a petroleum storage capacity of 55 gallons or greater. Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2016 San Francisco County CUPA Facilities List:rr-SANFRAN CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in San Francisco County. This list is made available by San Francisco County Hazardous Materials and Waste Program which is the CUPA for all areas of the County. Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2016 San Francisco County LOP Sites:rr-SANFRAN LOP-bb A list of Underground Storage Tank (UST) release sites in the County of San Francisco. This list is made available by San Francisco County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Protection Branch. Government Publication Date: Sep 19, 2016 San Francisco County UST List:rr-SANFRAN UST-bb A list of all registered Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) in the County of San Francisco. This ist is made available by San Francisco County Environmental Health Division. The Hazardous Materials and Waste Program provides regulatory oversight for the construction, operation, repair and removal of USTs in San Francisco. Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2016 San Joaquin County Aboveground Tank List:rr-SANJOAQUIN AST-bb A list of Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) inspected by San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) under Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA). Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2016 SAN LEANDRO CUPA SANBERN CUPA SANDIEGO HAZ SANDIEGO SAM SANDIEGO SWF SANDIEGO UST SANFRAN AST SANFRAN CUPA SANFRAN LOP SANFRAN UST SANJOAQUIN AST 81 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 San Joaquin Hazardous Waste Facilities:rr-SANJOAQUIN HW-bb A list of Hazardous Waste Facilities in San Joaquin County. This list is made available by San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2016 San Joaquin County UST List:rr-SANJOAQUIN UST-bb A list of all registered Underground Storage Tanks in the County of San Joaquin. The list is made available by San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division. Government Publication Date: Oct 14, 2016 San Luis Obispo County CUPA Facilities List:rr-SANLUISOB CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in San Luis Obispo County. This list is made available by County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Services Division which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Aug 01, 2016 San Mateo County CUPA Facilities List:rr-SANMATEO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in San Mateo County. This list is made available by San Mateo County Environmental Health Department which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Aug 04, 2016 San Mateo County LOP List:rr-SANMATEO LOP-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities in San Mateo County. This list is made available by San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division. Government Publication Date: Aug 3, 2016 Santa Barbara County Site Mitigation Unit (SMU) Master Site List:rr-SANTA BARB SMU-bb The Site Mitigation Unit Program (SMU) oversees the assessment and mitigation of hazardous substances releases that occur (which are not related with the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Program). The SMU Master Site List is maintained by the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Environmental Health Services Division. Government Publication Date: Aug 04, 2016 Los Angeles County - Santa Monica City CUPA Facilities List:rr-SANTA MONICA CUPA-bb The Santa Monica Fire Department's office maintains a list of CUPA Facilities located in Santa Monica city. Government Publication Date: Aug 01, 2016 Los Angeles County - Santa Monica City Underground Storage Tank List:rr-SANTA MONICA UST-bb A list of registered active Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) in the City of Santa Monica made available by Santa Monica Fire Prevention Division. Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2016 Santa Clara County CUPA Facilities List:rr-SANTACLARA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Santa Clara County. This list is made available by Santa Clara County Department of Environmental health (DEH). DEH's Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (HMCD) is CUPA for the county with jurisdiction within the Cities of Los Altos Hills, Monte Sereno, and Saratoga; and in all unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County, including Moffett Field, San Martin, and Stanford. Government Publication Date: Aug 22, 2016 Gilroy City CUPA Facilities List:rr-SANTACLARA GIL-bb The Gilroy City Fire Marshal's office maintains a list of CUPA Facilities located in Gilroy City. Government Publication Date: Aug 02,2016 Santa Clara Local Oversight Program Listing:rr-SANTACLARA LO-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) facilities in Santa Clara County Provided by Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health (DEH). Since July 1, 2004 the DEH has served as the oversight agency for investigations and clean-up of petroleum releases from underground storage tanks through implementation of the Local Oversight Program (LOP) contract with the State Water Resources Control Board. Government Publication Date: Oct 12, 2016 SANJOAQUIN HW SANJOAQUIN UST SANLUISOB CUPA SANMATEO CUPA SANMATEO LOP SANTA BARB SMU SANTA MONICA CUPA SANTA MONICA UST SANTACLARA CUPA SANTACLARA GIL SANTACLARA LO 82 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Santa Cruz County CUPA Facility List:rr-SANTACRUZ CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Santa Cruz County. This list is made available by Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Services (EHS) Division which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Jul 20, 2016 Shasta County CUPA Facility List:rr-SHASTA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Shasta County. This list is made available by Shasta County Environmental Health Division which has been designated as the CUPA for Shasta County by CalEPA. Government Publication Date: Aug 15, 2016 Siskiyou County CUPA List:rr-SISKIYOU CUPA-bb The Hazardous Materials Management Group of Siskiyou County's Environmental Health Division Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) regulates underground tanks, hazardous materials (including but not limited to: hazardous substances, hazardous waste, and any material which a handler or the CUPA has reasonable basis for believing that it would be injurious to the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the workplace or the environment. Government Publication Date: Oct 7, 2016 Solano County CUPA List:rr-SOLANO CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the County of Solano. This list is made available by Solano County Environmental Health Division which has been certified by CalEPA to implement the Unified program as a CUPA. Government Publication Date: Aug 04, 2016 Solano County Local Oversight Program List:rr-SOLANO LOP-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities in the Solano County. This list is made available by the Solano County Environmental Health Services. Since April 1993, the State Water Resources Control Board has contracted with the County of Solano to provide regulatory oversight for the cleanup of LUSTs under Local Oversight Program (LOP) contract. Government Publication Date: Aug 04, 2016 Solano County Underground Storage Tanks List:rr-SOLANO UST-bb A list of all registered Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) in the County of Solano. The list is made available by Solano County Environmental Health Services Division. There are an estimated 190 facilities throughout the county that are subject to the regulatory requirements of the UST program. Government Publication Date: Aug 04, 2016 Sonoma County CUPA Facilities List:rr-SONOMA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Sonoma County. This list is made available by Sonoma County Hazardous Materials (HazMat) Division which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Sep 27, 2016 Sonoma County LOP Site List:rr-SONOMA LOP-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities in Sonoma County. This list is made available by Sonoma County Department of Health Services. Sonoma County Local Oversight Program (LOP) oversees the investigation and cleanup of fuel releases from underground storage tanks in all areas of the County with the exception of the Cities of Santa Rosa and Healdsburg. Government Publication Date: Oct 4, 2016 Sonoma County Petaluma City CUPA Facilities:rr-SONOMA PETAL-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Petaluma City, as well as Closed files including pre- CUPA sites. This list is made available by Petaluma Fire Prevention Bureau which is the CUPA for Petaluma City in Sonoma County. Government Publication Date: Jul 26, 2016 Stanislaus County CUPA List:rr-STANISLAUS CUPA-bb The Environmental Resources Department of Stanislaus County maintains a list of Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) facilities. Government Publication Date: Aug 03, 2016 Sutter County CUPA List:rr-SUTTER CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank (APSA) regulation, Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) Program and Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulation of Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Sutter County. This list is made available by Sutter County Enviornmental Health Division which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. SANTACRUZ CUPA SHASTA CUPA SISKIYOU CUPA SOLANO CUPA SOLANO LOP SOLANO UST SONOMA CUPA SONOMA LOP SONOMA PETAL STANISLAUS CUPA SUTTER CUPA 83 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Government Publication Date: Jul 15, 2016 Tehama County CUPA List:rr-TEHAMA CUPA-bb The Environmental Health Department of Tehama County keeps a list of all Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) facilities within the county. Government Publication Date: Aug 03, 2016 Los Angeles County - Torrance City Underground Storage Tanks:rr-TORRANCE UST-bb A list of registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Torrance City of Los Angeles County. This list is made available by Torrance City Office of Clerk. Government Publication Date: Oct 4, 2016 Trinity County CUPA List:rr-TRINITY CUPA-bb On January 1, 2005, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) was authorized by the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) as the Trinity County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). This CUPA list was made available by the DTSC. Government Publication Date: Oct 13, 2016 Tulare County CUPA List:rr-TULARE CUPA-bb The Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) unifies and consolidates under one roof the various requirements for businesses handling hazardous materials, generating or treating hazardous wastes, or operating aboveground or underground storage tanks. CUPA thereby enhances consistency, reduces duplication, and simplifies compliance for the regulated public. The Tulare County Environmental Health Division was certified as a CUPA in December, 1996. Government Publication Date: Jul 07, 2016 Tuolumne County CUPA Facility List:rr-TUOLUMNE CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Tuolumne County. This list is made available by Tuolumne County Environmental Health which is the CUPA for all areas of the County. Government Publication Date: Aug 12, 2016 Ventura County CUPA Facilities List:rr-VENTURA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Ventura County. This list is made available by Ventura County Environmental health Division. Government Publication Date: Sep 26, 2016 Ventura County Leaking Underground Fuel Tanks - Historic:rr-VENTURA HLUFT-bb A historical list of cleanup oversight of the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) program provided by Ventura County Environmental Health Division. All new and existing underground fuel storage tank releases are now referred to the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Government Publication Date: May 31, 2008 Ventura County Inactive Underground Storage Tanks Sites:rr-VENTURA INUST-bb A list of inactive Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Ventura County. This list is made available by Ventura County Environmental Health Division. Government Publication Date: Jul 21, 2016 Los Angeles County - Vernon City UST List:rr-VERNON UST-bb A list of Underground Storage Tanks (UST) in Vernon City provided by the Vernon City Fire Department. Government Publication Date: Sep 8, 2016 Yolo County UST List:rr-YOLO UST-bb A list of registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Yolo County. This list is made available by Yolo County Environmental Health Department which regulates the construction, operation, repair and removal of USTs throughout Yolo County. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2016 Yuba County CUPA Facilities List:rr-YUBA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Yuba County. This list is made available by Yuba County Environmental Health Division which is the CUPA for all areas of the County. Government Publication Date: Aug 03, 2016 TEHAMA CUPA TORRANCE UST TRINITY CUPA TULARE CUPA TUOLUMNE CUPA VENTURA CUPA VENTURA HLUFT VENTURA INUST VERNON UST YOLO UST YUBA CUPA 84 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Delisted Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 Facility Registry Service/Facility Index:rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Facility Registry System (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2016 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program:rr-TRIS-bb The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2014 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System:rr-HMIRS-bb US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. Government Publication Date: Sep 08, 2016 National Clandestine Drug Labs:rr-NCDL-bb The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: May 17, 2016 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985:rr-ODI-bb The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA of the Act) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands:rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified ongressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 Toxic Substances Control Act:rr-TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2014 Hist TSCA:rr-HIST TSCA-bb DELISTED FED DRY FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS NCDL ODI IODI TSCA HIST TSCA 85 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing:rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing:rr-FTTS INSP-bb An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List:rr-PRP-bb Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date: Nov 12, 2013 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing:rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2016 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS):rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date: May 24, 2016 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner facilities from the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 Formerly Used Defense Sites:rr-FUDS-bb Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2013 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS):rr-MLTS-bb A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. Government Publication Date: Jul 13, 2016 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites:rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS 86 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File:rr-MINES-bb The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date: Feb 19, 2016 State EnviroStor Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement:rr-INSP COMP ENF-bb A list of permitted facilities with inspections and enforcements tracked in the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) EnviroStor. Government Publication Date: Jul 15, 2016 Clandestine Drug Lab Sites:rr-CDL-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2015 School Property Evaluation Program Sites:rr-SCH-bb A list of sites registered with The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) School Property Evaluation and Cleanup (SPEC) Division. SPEC is responsible for assessing, investigating and cleaning up proposed school sites. The Division ensures that selected properties are free of contamination or, if the properties were previously contaminated, that they have been cleaned up to a level that protects the students and staff who will occupy the new school. Government Publication Date: Jul 19, 2016 California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS):rr-CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS). This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES). Government Publication Date: Aug 8, 2016 Sites Listed in the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report:rr-SWAT-bb In a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agreed to submit a comprehensive report on the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This report summarizes the work completed to date on the SWAT Program, and addresses both the impacts that leakage from solid waste disposal sites (SWDS) may have upon waters of the State and the actions taken to address such leakage. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1995 Hazardous Waste Manifest Data:rr-HAZNET-bb A list of hazardous waste manifests received each year by Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments. Government Publication Date: Oct 2,2015 Solid Waste Disposal Sites with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels:rr-SWRCB SWF-bb This is a list of solid waste disposal sites identified by California State Water Resources Control Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit. Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2006 List of Hazardous Waste Facilities Subject to Corrective Action:rr-DTSC HWF-bb This is a list of hazardous waste facilities identified in Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25187.5. These facilities are those where Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has taken or contracted for corrective action because a facility owner/operator has failed to comply with a date for taking corrective action in an order issued under HSC § 25187, or because DTSC determined that immediate corrective action was necessary to abate an imminent or substantial endangerment. Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016 Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data:rr-HIST MANIFEST-bb A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments. MINES INSP COMP ENF CDL SCH CHMIRS SWAT HAZNET SWRCB SWF DTSC HWF HIST MANIFEST 87 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992 Historical California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS):rr-HIST CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) prior to 1993. This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES). Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993 Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders:rr-CDO/CAO-bb The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders. Government Publication Date: Feb 16, 2012 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial, linen supply, commercial laundry, dry cleaning and pressing machines - Coin Operated Laundry and Dry Cleaning. This is provided by the Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2016 Delisted Drycleaners:rr-DELISTED DRYC-bb Sites removed from the list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers, made available by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2016 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County Ventura County Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites:rr-HW INACTIVE-bb A list of Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites in Ventura County collected by Ventura County's Environmental Health Division. Government Publication Date: Jun 28, 2016 Los Angeles County Site Mitigation List:rr-LA SML-bb A Site Mitigation List in the County of Los Angeles. The list is made available by Los Angeles County Fire Department. Site mitigation is handled by the Site Mitigation Unit (SMU) which facilitates completion of site clean-up projects of contaminated sites in an expeditious manner in all cities of the Los Angeles County except El Segundo, Glendale, Long Beach, Santa Fe Springs, and Vernon. Government Publication Date: Jun 23, 2015 Riverside County Hazardous Waste Generator Sites List:rr-RIVERSIDE HWG-bb A list of Hazardous Waste Generator Sites in the County of Riverside. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Sep 07, 2016 Riverside County Disclosure Facility List:rr-RIVERSIDE HZH-bb A list of facilities disclosed to Riverside County Department of Environmental Health (DEH). This list is made available by Riverside County DEH which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. A business is required to establish and submit a Business Plan if the facility handles hazardous material equal to or greater than 55 gallons, 500 pounds or 200 cubic feet at any time during the year. Government Publication Date: Sep 19, 2016 San Joaquin County Hazardous Materials Facilities List:rr-SANJOAQUIN HM-bb A list of Hazardous Materials Facilities in San Joaquin County. This list is made available by San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. Government Publication Date: Oct 14, 2016 HIST CHMIRS CDO/CAO DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC HW INACTIVE LA SML RIVERSIDE HWG RIVERSIDE HZH SANJOAQUIN HM 88 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 Union CIty CERS CUPA List:rr-UNION CITY CERS CUPA-bb A list of CERS registered facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in the City of Union. This list is made available by the City of Union Economic and Community Development Department. Government Publication Date: Aug 3, 2016 Ventura County Hazardous Material Release (Prop 65) Sites:rr-VENTURA HAZR-bb A historic list of hazardous material releases from the Hazardous Material Release Report collected by the Environmental Health Division of Ventura County. As per the department this report contains records from 1987 to 2014. Government Publication Date: 1987 - 2014 Delisted County Records:rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb Records removed from county or CUPA databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2016 UNION CITY CERS CUPA VENTURA HAZR DELISTED COUNTY 89 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20161031177 h-Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. Map Key:The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference. Definitions APPENDIX 8.5 Hydrology and Water Quality Reports APPENDIX 8.6 Noise Data Site Number: Orange Chick-fil-A Site #1 Recorded By: Pierre Glaize Job Number: 166516 Date: 06/19/18 Time: 9:48 a.m. Location: Near apartment #1514, adjacent to alleyway, off Almond Avenue & McRoy Road. Source of Peak Noise: Construction noise nearby, traffic on Almond Avenue, plane above. Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 58.4 50.6 76.0 90.6 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 3011133 3/29/2018 Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 3086765 3/26/2018 Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 25380 3/29/2018 Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 3/28/2018 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.00 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (inches) 1 68 30.00 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument:2250 Application:BZ7225 Version 4.7.4 Start Time:06/19/2018 09:47:47 End Time:06/19/2018 09:57:47 Elapsed Time:00:10:00 Bandwidth:1/3-octave Max Input Level:142.05 Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak):FSI AC Broadband Peak:C Spectrum:FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input:Top Socket Windscreen Correction:UA-1650 Sound Field Correction:Free-field Calibration Time: 06/19/2018 08:41:52 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity:43.9977012574673 mV/Pa ORA001 Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin time time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 58.4 76.0 50.6 Time 09:47:47 AM 09:57:47 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=58.4 dB LFmax=76.0 dB LFmin=50.6 dB ORA001 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 dB 06/19/2018 09:47:47 AM - 09:57:47 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA001 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 09:47:47 AM - 09:57:47 AM dB L1 = 69.2 dB L5 = 63.6 dB L10 = 60.4 dB L50 = 54.1 dB L90 = 52.3 dB L95 = 52.0 dB L99 = 51.4 dB Level Cumulative Cursor: 06/19/2018 09:52:46 AM - 09:52:47 AM LAIeq=54.9 dB LAFmax=53.2 dB LCpeak=76.1 dB LAFmin=51.5 dB ORA001 09:48:00 AM 09:50:00 AM 09:52:00 AM 09:54:00 AM 09:56:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA001 Start Elapsed LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB][dB][dB] Value 54.9 53.2 51.5 Time 09:52:46 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=52.3 dB ORA001 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 09:52:46 AM - 09:52:47 AM Hz LZeq Cursor: 06/19/2018 09:47:47 AM - 10:47:47 AM LAIeq=60.3 dB LAFmax=76.0 dB LCpeak=90.6 dB LAFmin=50.6 dB ORA001 Periodic reports 09:50:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 10:10:00 AM 10:20:00 AM 10:30:00 AM 10:40:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA001 Periodic reports Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 60.3 76.0 50.6 Time 09:47:47 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=58.4 dB LFmax=76.0 dB LFmin=50.6 dB ORA001 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 09:47:47 AM - 09:57:47 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA001 Periodic reports 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 09:47:47 AM - 09:57:47 AM dB L1 = 69.2 dB L5 = 63.6 dB L10 = 60.4 dB L50 = 54.1 dB L90 = 52.3 dB L95 = 52.0 dB L99 = 51.4 dB Level Cumulative Site Number: Orange Chick-fil-A Site #2 Recorded By: Pierre Glaize Job Number: 166516 Date: 06/19/18 Time: 10:02 a.m. Location: Across project site, in-front of house #1433 West Almond Avenue. Source of Peak Noise: Construction adjacent to noise measurement, traffic on Almond Avenue. Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 59.8 49.8 76.1 98.0 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 3011133 3/29/2018 Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 3086765 3/26/2018 Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 25380 3/29/2018 Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 3/28/2018 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.00 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (inches) 1 69 30.00 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument:2250 Application:BZ7225 Version 4.7.4 Start Time:06/19/2018 10:01:07 End Time:06/19/2018 10:11:07 Elapsed Time:00:10:00 Bandwidth:1/3-octave Max Input Level:142.05 Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak):FSI AC Broadband Peak:C Spectrum:FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input:Top Socket Windscreen Correction:UA-1650 Sound Field Correction:Free-field Calibration Time: 06/19/2018 08:41:52 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity:43.9977012574673 mV/Pa ORA002 Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin time time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 59.8 76.1 49.8 Time 10:01:07 AM 10:11:07 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=59.8 dB LFmax=76.1 dB LFmin=49.8 dB ORA002 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 dB 06/19/2018 10:01:07 AM - 10:11:07 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA002 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 10:01:07 AM - 10:11:07 AM dB L1 = 71.2 dB L5 = 66.4 dB L10 = 62.0 dB L50 = 54.6 dB L90 = 51.9 dB L95 = 51.5 dB L99 = 51.0 dB Level Cumulative Cursor: 06/19/2018 10:06:06 AM - 10:06:07 AM LAIeq=60.0 dB LAFmax=59.8 dB LCpeak=77.6 dB LAFmin=55.4 dB ORA002 10:02:00 AM 10:04:00 AM 10:06:00 AM 10:08:00 AM 10:10:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA002 Start Elapsed LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB][dB][dB] Value 60.0 59.8 55.4 Time 10:06:06 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=57.7 dB ORA002 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 10:06:06 AM - 10:06:07 AM Hz LZeq Cursor: 06/19/2018 10:01:07 AM - 11:01:07 AM LAIeq=61.7 dB LAFmax=76.1 dB LCpeak=98.0 dB LAFmin=49.8 dB ORA002 Periodic reports 10:10:00 AM 10:20:00 AM 10:30:00 AM 10:40:00 AM 10:50:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA002 Periodic reports Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 61.7 76.1 49.8 Time 10:01:07 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=59.8 dB LFmax=76.1 dB LFmin=49.8 dB ORA002 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 10:01:07 AM - 10:11:07 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA002 Periodic reports 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 10:01:07 AM - 10:11:07 AM dB L1 = 71.2 dB L5 = 66.4 dB L10 = 62.0 dB L50 = 54.6 dB L90 = 51.9 dB L95 = 51.5 dB L99 = 51.0 dB Level Cumulative Site Number: Orange Chick-fil-A Site #3 Recorded By: Pierre Glaize Job Number: 166516 Date: 06/19/18 Time: 10:15 a.m. Location: On-site on the western end, adjacent to wall by childcare building. Source of Peak Noise: Construction noise, children playing outside, traffic on almond, plane above. Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 55.0 46.5 66.8 89.5 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 3011133 3/29/2018 Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 3086765 3/26/2018 Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 25380 3/29/2018 Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 3/28/2018 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.00 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (inches) 3 69 30.00 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument:2250 Application:BZ7225 Version 4.7.4 Start Time:06/19/2018 10:14:28 End Time:06/19/2018 10:24:28 Elapsed Time:00:10:00 Bandwidth:1/3-octave Max Input Level:142.05 Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak):FSI AC Broadband Peak:C Spectrum:FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input:Top Socket Windscreen Correction:UA-1650 Sound Field Correction:Free-field Calibration Time: 06/19/2018 08:41:52 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity:43.9977012574673 mV/Pa ORA003 Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin time time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 55.0 66.8 46.5 Time 10:14:28 AM 10:24:28 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=55.0 dB LFmax=66.8 dB LFmin=46.5 dB ORA003 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 dB 06/19/2018 10:14:28 AM - 10:24:28 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA003 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 10:14:28 AM - 10:24:28 AM dB L1 = 63.0 dB L5 = 59.8 dB L10 = 58.0 dB L50 = 53.2 dB L90 = 49.7 dB L95 = 48.9 dB L99 = 47.8 dB Level Cumulative Cursor: 06/19/2018 10:19:27 AM - 10:19:28 AM LAIeq=56.0 dB LAFmax=54.3 dB LCpeak=72.1 dB LAFmin=49.4 dB ORA003 10:15:00 AM 10:17:00 AM 10:19:00 AM 10:21:00 AM 10:23:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA003 Start Elapsed LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB][dB][dB] Value 56.0 54.3 49.4 Time 10:19:27 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=51.2 dB ORA003 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 10:19:27 AM - 10:19:28 AM Hz LZeq Cursor: 06/19/2018 10:14:28 AM - 11:14:28 AM LAIeq=57.6 dB LAFmax=66.8 dB LCpeak=89.5 dB LAFmin=46.5 dB ORA003 Periodic reports 10:20:00 AM 10:30:00 AM 10:40:00 AM 10:50:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 11:10:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA003 Periodic reports Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 57.6 66.8 46.5 Time 10:14:28 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=55.0 dB LFmax=66.8 dB LFmin=46.5 dB ORA003 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 10:14:28 AM - 10:24:28 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA003 Periodic reports 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 10:14:28 AM - 10:24:28 AM dB L1 = 63.0 dB L5 = 59.8 dB L10 = 58.0 dB L50 = 53.2 dB L90 = 49.7 dB L95 = 48.9 dB L99 = 47.8 dB Level Cumulative Site Number: Orange Chick-fil-A Site #4 Recorded By: Pierre Glaize Job Number: 166516 Date: 06/19/18 Time: 10:30 a.m. Location: On Almond Avenue, across mainstreet from project site, infront of house #1318 Source of Peak Noise: Traffic on Almond and Main Street. Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 58.1 47.4 72.4 91.7 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 3011133 3/29/2018 Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 3086765 3/26/2018 Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 25380 3/29/2018 Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 3/28/2018 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.00 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (inches) 4 71 30.00 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument:2250 Application:BZ7225 Version 4.7.4 Start Time:06/19/2018 10:29:41 End Time:06/19/2018 10:39:41 Elapsed Time:00:10:00 Bandwidth:1/3-octave Max Input Level:142.05 Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak):FSI AC Broadband Peak:C Spectrum:FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input:Top Socket Windscreen Correction:UA-1650 Sound Field Correction:Free-field Calibration Time: 06/19/2018 08:41:52 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity:43.9977012574673 mV/Pa ORA004 Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin time time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 58.1 72.4 47.4 Time 10:29:41 AM 10:39:41 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=58.1 dB LFmax=72.4 dB LFmin=47.4 dB ORA004 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 dB 06/19/2018 10:29:41 AM - 10:39:41 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA004 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 10:29:41 AM - 10:39:41 AM dB L1 = 67.1 dB L5 = 64.3 dB L10 = 61.5 dB L50 = 54.9 dB L90 = 50.0 dB L95 = 49.1 dB L99 = 48.3 dB Level Cumulative Cursor: 06/19/2018 10:34:40 AM - 10:34:41 AM LAIeq=51.9 dB LAFmax=52.3 dB LCpeak=75.0 dB LAFmin=51.0 dB ORA004 10:30:00 AM 10:32:00 AM 10:34:00 AM 10:36:00 AM 10:38:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA004 Start Elapsed LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB][dB][dB] Value 51.9 52.3 51.0 Time 10:34:40 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=51.5 dB ORA004 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 10:34:40 AM - 10:34:41 AM Hz LZeq Cursor: 06/19/2018 10:29:41 AM - 11:29:41 AM LAIeq=59.4 dB LAFmax=72.4 dB LCpeak=91.7 dB LAFmin=47.4 dB ORA004 Periodic reports 10:30:00 AM 10:40:00 AM 10:50:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 11:10:00 AM 11:20:00 AM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin ORA004 Periodic reports Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [%][dB][dB][dB] Value 0.00 59.4 72.4 47.4 Time 10:29:41 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/19/2018 Cursor: (A) Leq=58.1 dB LFmax=72.4 dB LFmin=47.4 dB ORA004 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 06/19/2018 10:29:41 AM - 10:39:41 AM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [78.0 ; 78.2[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% ORA004 Periodic reports 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/19/2018 10:29:41 AM - 10:39:41 AM dB L1 = 67.1 dB L5 = 64.3 dB L10 = 61.5 dB L50 = 54.9 dB L90 = 50.0 dB L95 = 49.1 dB L99 = 48.3 dB Level Cumulative Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:28698 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:2869.8 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:50 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:55.9 64.6 62.8 56.8 65.4 66.0 Medium Trucks:64.8 56.7 50.4 48.8 57.3 57.5 Heavy Trucks:69.7 57.7 48.7 49.9 59.6 59.7 Vehicle Noise:72.0 66.2 63.3 58.3 66.9 67.4 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -673 673 -460 460 -213 213 -146 146 -67 67 -67 67 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Existing 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Chapman Avenue to Almond Avenue Main Street Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:28578 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:2857.8 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:45 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:55.9 64.7 62.9 56.8 65.5 66.1 Medium Trucks:64.9 56.8 50.4 48.8 57.3 57.6 Heavy Trucks:69.7 57.8 48.7 49.9 59.6 59.8 Vehicle Noise:72.1 66.3 63.3 58.4 67.0 67.5 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -669 669 -458 458 -212 212 -145 145 -67 67 -67 67 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Existing 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Almond Avenue to Palmyra Avenue Main Street Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:2453 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:245.3 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:30 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:40 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:41.7 50.5 48.7 42.6 51.3 51.9 Medium Trucks:52.3 44.3 37.9 36.3 44.8 45.0 Heavy Trucks:58.0 46.0 37.0 38.2 48.3 48.5 Vehicle Noise:60.5 53.0 49.4 45.1 53.7 54.1 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -30 30 -21 21 -10 10 -7 7 -3 3 -3 3 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Existing 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Feldner Road to Main Street Almond Avenue Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:7093 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:709.3 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:25 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:40 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:44.1 52.8 51.0 45.0 53.6 54.2 Medium Trucks:55.7 47.6 41.3 39.7 48.2 48.4 Heavy Trucks:61.9 49.9 40.9 42.1 52.5 52.6 Vehicle Noise:64.5 56.1 52.0 48.2 56.7 57.1 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -61 61 -42 42 -19 19 -13 13 -6 6 -6 6 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Existing 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Main Street to Batavia Street Almond Avenue Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:30676 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:3067.6 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:50 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:56.1 64.9 63.1 57.1 65.7 66.3 Medium Trucks:65.1 57.0 50.6 49.1 57.6 57.8 Heavy Trucks:69.9 58.0 48.9 50.2 59.9 60.0 Vehicle Noise:72.3 66.5 63.6 58.6 67.2 67.7 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -720 720 -492 492 -228 228 -156 156 -72 72 -72 72 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Chapman Avenue to Almond Avenue Main Street Analyst: 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:30413 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:3041.3 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:45 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:56.2 65.0 63.2 57.1 65.7 66.3 Medium Trucks:65.1 57.1 50.7 49.1 57.6 57.8 Heavy Trucks:70.0 58.0 49.0 50.2 59.9 60.0 Vehicle Noise:72.4 66.5 63.6 58.7 67.2 67.7 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -712 712 -487 487 -225 225 -154 154 -71 71 -71 71 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Almond Avenue to Palmyra Avenue Main Street Analyst: 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:2502 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:250.2 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:30 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:40 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:41.8 50.6 48.8 42.7 51.4 52.0 Medium Trucks:52.4 44.3 38.0 36.4 44.9 45.1 Heavy Trucks:58.1 46.1 37.1 38.3 48.4 48.5 Vehicle Noise:60.6 53.1 49.5 45.2 53.7 54.2 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -31 31 -21 21 -10 10 -7 7 -3 3 -3 3 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Feldner Road to Main Street Almond Avenue Analyst: 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:7235 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:723.5 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:25 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:40 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:44.1 52.9 51.1 45.0 53.7 54.3 Medium Trucks:55.8 47.7 41.3 39.8 48.3 48.5 Heavy Trucks:61.9 50.0 40.9 42.2 52.6 52.7 Vehicle Noise:64.6 56.2 52.1 48.3 56.8 57.2 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -62 62 -42 42 -20 20 -13 13 -6 6 -6 6 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Main Street to Batavia Street Almond Avenue Analyst: 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:31442 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:3144.2 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:50 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:56.2 65.0 63.2 57.2 65.8 66.4 Medium Trucks:65.2 57.1 50.8 49.2 57.7 57.9 Heavy Trucks:70.0 58.1 49.1 50.3 60.0 60.1 Vehicle Noise:72.4 66.6 63.7 58.7 67.3 67.8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -736 736 -503 503 -233 233 -159 159 -74 74 -74 74 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future Plus Project 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Chapman Avenue to Almond Avenue Main Street Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:31058 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:3105.8 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:45 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:56.3 65.0 63.3 57.2 65.8 66.4 Medium Trucks:65.2 57.2 50.8 49.2 57.7 57.9 Heavy Trucks:70.1 58.1 49.1 50.3 60.0 60.1 Vehicle Noise:72.4 66.6 63.7 58.8 67.3 67.8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -727 727 -497 497 -230 230 -157 157 -73 73 -73 73 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future Plus Project 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Almond Avenue to Palmyra Avenue Main Street Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:3671 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:367.1 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:30 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:40 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:43.5 52.3 50.5 44.4 53.0 53.6 Medium Trucks:54.1 46.0 39.6 38.1 46.5 46.8 Heavy Trucks:59.7 47.8 38.7 39.9 50.1 50.2 Vehicle Noise:62.3 54.7 51.2 46.9 55.4 55.8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -45 45 -31 31 -14 14 -10 10 -5 5 -5 5 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future Plus Project 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Feldner Road to Main Street Almond Avenue Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour Project Name:Scenario: Job #: Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):0 Average Daily Traffic:7396 Receiver Barrier Dist:0 Peak Hour Traffic:739.6 Centerline Dist. To Observer:100 Vehicle Speed:25 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:0 Centerline Separation:40 Barrier Far lane CL Dist:0 Pad Elevation:0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation:0 Observer Height (above grade):0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height:0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View:90 Lft View:-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos:0 Medium Trucks:2.3 Heavy Trucks:8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos:44.2 53.0 51.2 45.1 53.8 54.4 Medium Trucks:55.9 47.8 41.4 39.9 48.3 48.6 Heavy Trucks:62.0 50.1 41.0 42.3 52.6 52.8 Vehicle Noise:64.7 56.3 52.2 48.4 56.9 57.3 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -64 64 -43 43 -20 20 -14 14 -6 6 -6 6 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Orange Chick-fil-A Danielle Regimbal CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Future Plus Project 166516 SITE DATA Road Segment:Main Street to Batavia Street Almond Avenue Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 FeetRoadway Centerline Roadway Centerline Noise Contour APPENDIX 8.7 Traffic Impact Analysis and Circulation Plan N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Queuing Study\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street Supplemental Drive-Through Queuing Analysis - Orange, 05-10-19.doc TABLE 1 WEEKDAY QUEUING ANALYSIS SUMMARY 1 CHICK-FIL-A MAIN STREET, ORANGE Queue Length (Vehicles) Queue Frequency of Vehicles Observed Cumulative Site #1 4401 Pacific Coast Hwy, Long Beach, CA Site #2 4050 Lincoln Blvd, Venice, CA Total Frequency Percentage 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 1 0 3 3 3 2.1% 2 0 9 9 12 8.5% 3 0 4 4 16 11.3% 4 0 7 7 23 16.2% 5 4 8 12 35 24.6% 6 4 7 11 46 32.4% 7 3 4 7 53 37.3% 8 2 4 6 59 41.5% 9 4 5 9 68 47.9% 10 6 5 11 79 55.6% 11 9 5 14 93 65.5% 12 10 1 11 104 73.2% 13 4 2 6 110 77.5% 14 7 2 9 119 83.8% 15 7 1 8 127 89.4% 16 5 0 5 132 93.0% 17 3 1 4 136 95.8% 18 2 0 2 138 97.2% 19 2 0 2 140 98.6% 20 2 0 2 142 100.0% Total 74 68 142 -- -- Average 12.0 7.0 10.0 -- -- 85th Percentile 16.0 11.0 15.0 -- -- 95th Percentile 18.0 14.0 17.0 -- -- Max 20.0 17.0 20.0 -- -- 1 Source: Queuing surveys at Site #1 were conducted every 5 minutes, between the hours of 11:00AM to 2:00PM and 5:00PM to 8:00PM, by Transportation Studies, Inc. on Thursday, April 25, 2019. Queuing surveys at Site #2 were conducted every 5 minutes, between the hours of 11:00AM to 2:00PM and 5:00PM to 7:30PM, by City Traffic Counters on Wednesday, February 20, 2019. N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Queuing Study\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street Supplemental Drive-Through Queuing Analysis - Orange, 05-10-19.doc TABLE 2 FRIDAY QUEUING ANALYSIS SUMMARY 2 CHICK-FIL-A MAIN STREET, ORANGE Queue Length (Vehicles) Queue Frequency of Vehicles Observed Cumulative Site #1 4401 Pacific Coast Hwy, Long Beach, CA Site #2 4050 Lincoln Blvd, Venice, CA Total Frequency Percentage 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 1 0 3 3 3 2.0% 2 0 2 2 5 3.4% 3 1 7 8 13 8.8% 4 2 9 11 24 16.2% 5 0 8 8 32 21.6% 6 0 8 8 40 27.0% 7 3 5 8 48 32.4% 8 3 8 11 59 39.9% 9 8 4 12 71 48.0% 10 9 7 16 87 58.8% 11 6 6 12 99 66.9% 12 9 1 10 109 73.6% 13 10 4 14 123 83.1% 14 11 1 12 135 91.2% 15 8 1 9 144 97.3% 16 1 0 1 145 98.0% 17 2 0 2 147 99.3% 18 1 0 1 148 100.0% Total 74 74 148 -- -- Average 12.0 7.0 10.0 -- -- 85th Percentile 15.0 11.0 14.0 -- -- 95th Percentile 15.0 13.0 15.0 -- -- Max 18.0 15.0 18.0 -- -- 2 Source: Queuing surveys at Site #1 were conducted every 5 minutes, between the hours of 11:00AM to 2:00PM and 5:00PM to 8:00PM, by Transportation Studies, Inc. on Friday, April 26, 2019. Queuing surveys at Site #2 were conducted every 5 minutes, between the hours of 11:00AM to 2:00PM and 5:00PM to 8:00PM, by City Traffic Counters on Friday, February 22, 2019. N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Queuing Study\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street Supplemental Drive-Through Queuing Analysis - Orange, 05-10-19.doc TABLE 3 SATURDAY QUEUING ANALYSIS SUMMARY 3 CHICK-FIL-A MAIN STREET, ORANGE Queue Length (Vehicles) Queue Frequency of Vehicles Observed Cumulative Site #1 4401 Pacific Coast Hwy, Long Beach, CA Site #2 4050 Lincoln Blvd, Venice, CA Total Frequency Percentage 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 1 0 1 1 1 0.7% 2 1 1 2 3 2.0% 3 2 4 6 9 6.1% 4 2 10 12 21 14.2% 5 0 16 16 37 25.0% 6 3 11 14 51 34.5% 7 5 9 14 65 43.9% 8 7 10 17 82 55.4% 9 12 7 19 101 68.2% 10 8 4 12 113 76.4% 11 6 0 6 119 80.4% 12 5 1 6 125 84.5% 13 10 0 10 135 91.2% 14 2 0 2 137 92.6% 15 6 0 6 143 96.6% 16 2 0 2 145 98.0% 17 1 0 1 146 98.6% 18 1 0 1 147 99.3% 19 1 0 1 148 100.0% Total 74 74 148 -- -- Average 10.0 6.0 8.0 -- -- 85th Percentile 14.0 9.0 13.0 -- -- 95th Percentile 16.0 10.0 15.0 -- -- Max 19.0 12.0 19.0 -- -- 3 Source: Queuing surveys at Site #1 were conducted every 5 minutes, between the hours of 11:00AM to 2:00PM and 6:00PM to 9:00PM, by Transportation Studies, Inc. on Saturday, April 27, 2019. Queuing surveys at Site #2 were conducted every 5 minutes, between the hours of 11:00AM to 2:00PM and 6:00PM to 9:00PM, by City Traffic Counters on Saturday, February 23, 2019. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18-3939-1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Queuing Study\Report\3939 Dividers.doc APPENDIX A QUEUING DATA A-1 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 11:00 AM 2 5 2 Order Takers Outside 11:05 AM 2 5 3 Order Takers Outside 11:10 AM 0 6 3 Order Takers Outside 11:15 AM 4 12 3 Order Takers Outside 11:20 AM 2 11 3 Order Takers Outside 11:25 AM 2 9 3 Order Takers Outside 11:30 AM 2 6 3 Order Takers Outside 11:35 AM 4 7 3 Order Takers Outside 11:40 AM 5 13 3 Order Takers Return Inside 11:45 AM 3 11 11:50 AM 4 12 11:55 AM 5 10 12:00 PM 4 12 12:05 PM 6 11 12:10 PM 5 15 12:15 PM 5 14 12:20 PM 5 15 12:25 PM 10 15 12:30 PM 6 16 12:35 PM 5 12 12:40 PM 6 15 12:45 PM 6 16 12:50 PM 1 9 12:55 PM 4 12 1:00 PM 10 17 1:05 PM 10 19 1:10 PM 6 14 1:15 PM 11 18 1:20 PM 8 16 1:25 PM 8 15 1:30 PM 6 15 1:35 PM 7 17 1:40 PM 7 16 Max Queue Queuing Observations Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Thursday April 25, 2019 A-2 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 1:45 PM 4 12 1:50 PM 4 12 1:55 PM 5 14 2:00 PM 5 13 5:00 PM 12 20 5:05 PM 6 14 5:10 PM 4 10 5:15 PM 4 12 5:20 PM 3 11 1 Order Taker Outside 5:25 PM 5 13 5:30 PM 4 11 2 Order Takers Outside 5:35 PM 3 9 5:40 PM 1 6 5:45 PM 2 5 5:50 PM 6 10 5:55 PM 4 10 6:00 PM 5 13 6:05 PM 4 11 6:10 PM 2 7 6:15 PM 1 5 6:20 PM 3 8 3 Order Takers Outside 6:25 PM 2 7 6:30 PM 5 11 6:35 PM 2 6 6:40 PM 6 14 6:45 PM 6 14 6:50 PM 8 16 6:55 PM 10 18 7:00 PM 4 11 7:05 PM 4 12 7:10 PM 2 8 7:15 PM 3 10 7:20 PM 3 10 Max Queue Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Thursday April 25, 2019 Queuing Observations A-3 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 7:25 PM 12 19 7:30 PM 13 20 7:35 PM 10 17 7:40 PM 3 9 7:45 PM 5 14 7:50 PM 5 12 7:55 PM 4 11 8:00 PM 8 15 Max 20 Sum 896 Queuing Observations Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Thursday April 25, 2019 Max Queue A-4 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 11:00 AM 3 3 2 Order Takers Outside 11:05 AM 1 4 11:10 AM 3 7 3 Order Takers Outside 11:15 AM 6 9 11:20 AM 5 10 11:25 AM 5 12 11:30 AM 6 14 11:35 AM 7 15 11:40 AM 2 9 11:45 AM 7 12 11:50 AM 4 13 11:55 AM 6 14 12:00 PM 8 14 12:05 PM 6 13 12:10 PM 6 11 12:15 PM 7 14 12:20 PM 6 14 12:25 PM 6 13 12:30 PM 6 14 12:35 PM 7 12 12:40 PM 5 13 12:45 PM 6 13 12:50 PM 5 13 12:55 PM 5 10 1:00 PM 5 12 1:05 PM 4 10 1:10 PM 5 12 1:15 PM 7 15 1:20 PM 9 15 1:25 PM 7 15 1:30 PM 6 15 1:35 PM 8 16 1:40 PM 6 14 Queuing Observations Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Friday April 26, 2019 Max Queue A-5 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 1:45 PM 5 12 1:50 PM 5 12 1:55 PM 3 10 2:00 PM 7 14 5:00 PM 5 12 5:05 PM 4 11 5:10 PM 0 7 5:15 PM 6 10 5:20 PM 5 13 5:25 PM 6 11 5:30 PM 2 7 5:35 PM 3 4 5:40 PM 2 8 5:45 PM 2 9 5:50 PM 3 8 5:55 PM 4 8 6:00 PM 3 11 6:05 PM 3 10 6:10 PM 9 17 6:15 PM 10 18 6:20 PM 8 15 6:25 PM 4 12 6:30 PM 8 15 6:35 PM 9 17 6:40 PM 6 14 6:45 PM 1 9 6:50 PM 7 13 6:55 PM 6 14 7:00 PM 4 11 7:05 PM 1 10 7:10 PM 3 9 7:15 PM 3 9 7:20 PM 2 10 Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Friday April 26, 2019 Max Queue Queuing Observations A-6 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 7:25 PM 4 13 7:30 PM 3 9 7:35 PM 3 10 7:40 PM 8 15 7:45 PM 5 14 7:50 PM 5 13 7:55 PM 1 11 8:00 PM 3 9 Max 18 Sum 864 Max Queue Queuing Observations Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Friday April 26, 2019 A-7 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 11:00 AM 4 8 11:05 AM 1 7 11:10 AM 8 10 11:15 AM 8 13 11:20 AM 7 11 11:25 AM 4 12 11:30 AM 5 10 11:35 AM 1 7 11:40 AM 3 8 11:45 AM 5 10 11:50 AM 0 6 11:55 AM 8 8 12:00 PM 2 10 12:05 PM 3 9 12:10 PM 4 9 12:15 PM 9 13 12:20 PM 5 9 12:25 PM 5 10 12:30 PM 3 11 12:35 PM 5 9 12:40 PM 3 8 12:45 PM 6 10 12:50 PM 4 12 12:55 PM 7 9 1:00 PM 7 13 1:05 PM 6 14 1:10 PM 4 11 1:15 PM 4 9 1:20 PM 3 7 1:25 PM 2 6 1:30 PM 3 10 1:35 PM 4 11 1:40 PM 2 9 Queuing Observations Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Saturday April 27, 2019 Max Queue A-8 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 1:45 PM 1 9 1:50 PM 4 9 1:55 PM 4 12 2:00 PM 1 9 6:00 PM 8 15 6:05 PM 10 16 6:10 PM 5 12 6:15 PM 0 7 6:20 PM 0 3 6:25 PM 1 2 6:30 PM 1 4 6:35 PM 1 4 6:40 PM 1 3 6:45 PM 2 6 6:50 PM 2 8 6:55 PM 4 10 7:00 PM 1 7 7:05 PM 3 8 7:10 PM 2 8 7:15 PM 4 11 7:20 PM 3 9 7:25 PM 5 12 7:30 PM 5 13 7:35 PM 8 17 7:40 PM 4 15 7:45 PM 3 13 7:50 PM 10 19 7:55 PM 7 15 8:00 PM 6 13 8:05 PM 7 13 8:10 PM 6 13 8:15 PM 8 15 8:20 PM 4 11 Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Saturday April 27, 2019 Max Queue Queuing Observations A-9 Beginning Order Board Entire Street Time Back # Drive Thru Overflow Notes 8:25 PM 7 14 8:30 PM 3 9 8:35 PM 8 13 8:40 PM 8 16 8:45 PM 5 13 8:50 PM 10 18 8:55 PM 6 15 9:00 PM 8 15 Max 19 Sum 773 Max Queue Queuing Observations Chick-fil-A (4401 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach) Saturday April 27, 2019 A-10 A-11 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2019 WEEKDAY MID-DAY ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES AM 11:00 1 0 4 11:05 6 0 1 11:10 2 3 4 11:15 5 1 5 11:20 4 1 5 11:25 3 2 2 11:30 4 2 3 11:35 4 2 2 11:40 2 0 2 11:45 6 0 1 11:50 0 1 4 11:55 5 1 2 PM 12:00 7 2 4 12:05 3 2 8 2 ORDER TAKERS ARRIVE OUTSIDE 12:10 8 3 6 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:15 8 3 10 12:18PM-12:22PM Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:20 8 10 17 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:25 3 5 11 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:30 6 0 5 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:35 7 0 5 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE A-12 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2019 WEEKDAY MID-DAY ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 12:40 8 1 5 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:45 5 6 7 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:50 1 4 11 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:55 6 0 1 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:00 4 5 6 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:05 11 4 8 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:10 6 5 11 1:11PM-1:12PM Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:15 7 7 12 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:20 5 7 14 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:25 10 3 9 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:30 6 7 14 1:30PM-1:32PM Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:35 7 2 9 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:40 5 3 6 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:45 6 3 5 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:50 6 1 5 2 ORDER TAKERS RETURN INSIDE 1:55 5 2 4 2:00 7 1 3 TOTAL ARRIVAL:197 A-13 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2019 WEEKDAY EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 5:00 4 1 2 5:05 1 1 2 5:10 3 2 2 5:15 4 0 2 5:20 6 2 4 5:25 6 3 5 5:30 5 4 6 5:35 4 5 10 5:36PM-5:40PM Drive Thru 5:40 2 4 6 5:45 5 4 6 5:50 4 5 9 5:55 3 6 10 6:00 4 3 8 6:05 2 3 7 6:10 2 0 3 6:15 4 1 2 A-14 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2019 WEEKDAY EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 6:20 6 2 3 6:25 5 2 4 6:30 7 3 6 6:35 4 3 9 6:40 4 8 13 6:45 5 4 10 6:50 6 4 11 6:55 5 4 10 6:56PM-7:00PM Drive Thru 1 ORDER TAKER ARRIVES OUTSIDE 7:00 6 8 15 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:05 4 6 13 1 ADDITIONAL ORDER TAKER ARRIVES 7:10 5 2 7 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 7:15 5 2 9 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 7:20 4 5 11 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 7:25 4 2 8 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 7:30 5 0 7 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE TOTAL ARRIVAL:134 A-15 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2019 WEEKDAY MID-DAY ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES AM 11:00 3 1 7 11:05 5 1 6 11:10 4 1 5 11:15 4 1 5 11:20 3 2 6 11:25 5 1 2 11:30 8 2 4 11:35 3 5 10 11:40 4 3 9 11:45 5 2 6 11:50 8 0 5 11:55 1 3 8 PM 12:00 6 0 4 12:05 2 4 8 2 ORDER TAKERS ARRIVE OUTSIDE 12:10 5 0 4 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:15 6 0 5 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:20 7 1 4 12:24 - 12:26 - Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:25 7 5 10 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:30 6 6 12 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:35 11 5 11 12:37 - 12:39 - Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE A-16 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2019 WEEKDAY MID-DAY ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 12:40 5 6 13 12:40 - 12:46 - Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:45 6 5 11 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:50 6 2 8 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:55 7 3 6 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:00 10 2 8 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:05 5 6 8 1 ORDER TAKER RETURNS INSIDE 1:10 7 2 5 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:15 8 5 7 1:17 - 1:18 - Drive Thru 1 ADDITIONAL ORDER TAKER ARRIVES 1:20 5 7 13 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:25 3 7 14 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:30 9 2 6 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:35 7 3 10 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:40 9 1 4 1:42 - 1:44 - Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:45 8 7 11 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:50 6 7 13 1:50 - 1:55 - Drive Thru 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:55 4 9 15 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 2:00 7 2 9 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE TOTAL ARRIVAL:215 A-17 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2019 WEEKDAY EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 5:00 6 2 4 5:05 5 7 8 5:10 4 6 1 1 ORDER TAKER ARRIVES OUTSIDE 5:15 2 3 3 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 5:20 4 2 3 1 ORDER TAKER RETURNS INSIDE 5:25 5 1 2 5:30 3 1 3 5:35 7 0 1 5:40 2 3 4 5:45 5 1 3 5:50 7 1 4 5:55 8 7 10 6:00 2 6 10 6:05 5 5 6 1 ORDER TAKER ARRIVES OUTSIDE 6:10 4 5 10 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:15 6 3 8 1 ADDITIONAL ORDER TAKER ARRIVES A-18 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2019 WEEKDAY EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 6:20 2 6 13 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 6:25 5 2 5 1 ORDER TAKER RETURNS INSIDE 6:30 4 0 3 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:35 6 2 5 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:40 2 3 6 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:45 5 0 1 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:50 4 3 4 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:55 3 1 3 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:00 4 1 3 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:05 6 4 7 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:10 6 5 7 1 ADDITIONAL ORDER TAKER ARRIVES 7:15 3 3 5 1 ORDER TAKER RETURNS INSIDE 7:20 7 2 7 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:25 1 6 10 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:30 6 7 11 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:35 5 5 9 7:35 - 7:39 - Drive Thru 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE A-19 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2019 WEEKDAY EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 7:40 3 7 9 7:41- 7:43 - Drive Thru 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:45 8 5 8 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:50 3 7 11 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 7:55 4 5 11 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 8:00 6 3 6 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE TOTAL ARRIVAL:168 A-20 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2019 WEEKEND MID-DAY ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES AM 11:00 5 2 3 11:05 4 1 4 11:10 4 3 5 11:15 4 2 6 11:20 5 2 6 11:25 5 3 8 11:30 3 1 5 11:35 7 0 1 11:40 3 2 5 11:45 6 3 5 11:50 2 5 7 11:55 5 2 6 12:00 7 4 7 PM 12:05 5 6 9 2 ORDER TAKERS ARRIVE OUTSIDE 12:10 3 5 8 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 12:15 2 3 8 1 ORDER TAKER RETURNS INSIDE 12:20 3 1 4 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 12:25 5 1 2 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 12:30 5 2 3 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 12:35 6 5 8 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE A-21 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2019 WEEKEND MID-DAY ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 12:40 9 4 8 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 12:45 4 5 9 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 12:50 5 2 8 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 12:55 4 4 7 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:00 5 3 6 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:05 5 4 8 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:10 7 0 4 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:15 6 1 5 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:20 8 3 5 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:25 6 4 10 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 1:30 5 4 9 1 ADDITIONAL ORDER TAKER ARRIVES 1:35 3 4 7 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:40 7 0 6 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:45 7 3 9 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE 1:50 6 3 9 1 ORDER TAKER RETURNS INSIDE 1:55 6 4 8 1:57 - 1:58 - Drive Thru 1 ADDITIONAL ORDER TAKER ARRIVES 2:00 4 4 9 2 ORDER TAKERS OUTSIDE TOTAL ARRIVAL:186 A-22 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2019 WEEKEND EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 6:00 6 6 10 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:05 3 5 10 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:10 6 4 10 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:15 5 4 9 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:20 2 7 12 1 ORDER TAKER OUTSIDE 6:25 3 2 5 1 ORDER TAKER RETURNS INSIDE 6:30 5 3 7 6:35 1 3 6 6:40 4 6 5 6:45 4 1 5 6:50 4 2 4 6:55 4 2 3 7:00 6 2 7 7:05 6 3 6 7:10 4 3 6 7:15 2 2 6 A-23 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2019 WEEKEND EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 7:20 3 0 4 7:25 8 1 3 7:30 5 3 7 7:35 4 1 4 7:40 6 3 5 7:45 2 4 6 7:50 3 3 5 7:55 2 3 7 8:00 6 2 5 8:05 2 1 4 8:10 6 2 6 8:15 1 1 4 8:20 7 1 4 8:25 8 2 5 8:30 3 2 8 8:35 4 3 8 A-24 VENICE CHICK-fil-A 4050 LINCOLN BLVD VENICE, CA 90292 SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2019 WEEKEND EVENING ARRIVAL RATE MAX QUEUE BEGINNING TOTAL #ORDER BOARD ENTIRE STREET TIME OF CARS BACK #DRIVE THRU OVERFLOW NOTES PM 8:40 5 1 5 8:45 2 5 7 8:50 5 1 4 8:55 4 3 5 9:00 3 1 5 TOTAL ARRIVAL:154 A-25 Ms. Jennifer M. Daw May 20, 2019 Page 2 N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Letters\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street Updated On-Site Transportation Circulation & Queuing Management Plan - Orange, 05-20-19.doc  “Our restaurants are staffed so that if the drive-thru queuing begins stacking beyond the drive-through lane, team members go out and assist with ordering via Chick-fil-A’s iPad ordering system. Our operators use the iPad ordering during our peak hours of 11:30 am to 1:30 pm and any additional time when needed. In addition, team members will monitor the Almond Street access and direct traffic, accordingly, to ensure that any vehicle queueing beyond the drive-through lane will not block vehicular circulation within the parking lot. The iPad ordering system allows team members to take orders, receive payment, and assist with traffic movement within the parking lot. Based on data from our other comparable stores, the iPad ordering system increases the CFA drive thru speed of service by 30% than the typical speaker box. Putting people forward in the drive-through is one of our biggest competitive advantages in the market because it personally connects our team members with our valued guest. We want to continue this momentum by building a platform to supporting current and future innovations that increase capacity and put our people forward to care for our guest in every interaction. Our customers enjoy the face to face ordering over the standard drive-thru experience.”  While extremely unlikely based on the Supplemental Queuing Analysis (LLG), dated May 10, 2019, should the drive-through queue extend onto Almond Avenue, Chick-fil-A staff will direct the customer to utilize the Main Street access to enter the drive-through lane. Chick-fil-A management will also direct staff to park in the stalls closest to the drive-through entrance along Almond Avenue. This will allow stacking, if needed, to occur without affecting public customers. Queuing Management Plan As stated above, Chick-fil-A will utilize the iPad ordering system to manage queuing, which will consist of two employees with iPads to take orders, receive payment, and assist with traffic movement within the parking lot. While this has been sufficient in their experience with other Chick-fil-A restaurants to manage queuing, on-site Chick- fil-A Staff will closely monitor and dispense another iPad-equipped employee or employees, as needed, to assist in the queuing management process whenever the drive-through queue extends beyond 17 vehicles and/or approaches the Almond Avenue Project driveway. The additional employee(s) will direct traffic to ensure that any queuing vehicles will not restrict circulation throughout the site and at the Project driveways , such as directing customers to utilize the Main Street access should the drive-through queue extend onto Almond Avenue. It should be noted that given the number of Chick-fil-A restaurants in the region and particularly now a second restaurant in the City of Orange, the likelihood of significant congestion and/or overcrowding of parking at this Chick-fil-A restaurant is LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Site Access ............................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Existing Street System ........................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions ............................................................................................ 5 3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) .......... 5 3.3.2 Highway Capacity Manual Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) .............. 5 3.3.2.1 Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections .................................................................... 6 3.3.2.2 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections ....................................................................... 6 3.4 Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio Method of Analysis (Roadway Segments)........................ 6 3.5 Level of Service Criteria ........................................................................................................ 6 3.6 Existing Level of Service Results .......................................................................................... 7 3.6.1 Intersections .................................................................................................................... 7 3.6.2 Roadway Segments ......................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Traffic Forecasting Methodology ......................................................................................... 13 5.0 Project Traffic Characteristics ............................................................................................. 14 5.1 Project Traffic Generation .................................................................................................... 14 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment ....................................................................... 14 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions .............................................................................. 15 6.0 Future Traffic Conditions ..................................................................................................... 17 6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth....................................................................................................... 17 6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics ........................................................................ 17 6.3 Year 2020 Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................. 18 7.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology ................................................................................. 21 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................................................ 21 7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios ....................................................................................... 21 8.0 Existing Plus Project Analysis .............................................................................................. 22 8.1 Intersections ......................................................................................................................... 22 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ...................................................................... 22 8.2 Roadway Segments .............................................................................................................. 22 8.2.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ...................................................................... 22 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAGE 9.0 Year 2020 Plus Project Analysis ........................................................................................... 25 9.1 Intersections ......................................................................................................................... 25 9.1.1 Year 2020 Cumulative Traffic Conditions ................................................................... 25 9.1.2 Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ............................................... 25 9.2 Roadway Segments .............................................................................................................. 25 9.2.1 Year 2020 Cumulative Traffic Conditions ................................................................... 26 9.2.2 Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ............................................... 26 10.0 Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation ................................................................ 29 10.1 Site Access Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 29 10.2 Internal Circulation Evaluation ........................................................................................ 29 10.3 Drive-Through Queuing Analysis .................................................................................... 29 11.0 Recommended Improvements .............................................................................................. 33 11.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions .......................................................................... 33 11.2 Year 2020 Plus Project Traffic Conditions ....................................................................... 33 12.0 Congestion Management Program (CMP) .......................................................................... 34 13.0 Summary Of Findings And Conclusions ............................................................................. 35 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Traffic Study Scope of Work B. Existing Traffic Count Data C. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets D. Project Driveways Level of Service Calculation Worksheets E. Drive-Through Queuing Study Data LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc iii LIST OF FIGURES SECTION—FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE 1–1 Vicinity Map .................................................................................................................... 2 2–1 Existing Site Aerial ........................................................................................................... 3 2–2 Proposed Site Plan ........................................................................................................... 3 3–1 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls ........................................... 5 3–2 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 5 3–3 Existing PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ..................................................... 5 5–1 Project Traffic Distribution Pattern .............................................................................. 16 5–2 AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 16 5–3 PM Peak Hour and Daily Project Traffic Volumes ..................................................... 16 5–4 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................... 16 5–5 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes .............................. 16 6–1 Location of Cumulative Projects .................................................................................... 20 6–2 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes ................................................ 20 6–3 PM Peak Hour and Daily Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes ............................... 20 6–4 Year 2020 Cumulative AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................ 20 6–5 Year 2020 Cumulative PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ........................... 20 6–6 Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................... 20 6–7 Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes ...... 20 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc iv LIST OF TABLES SECTION—TABLE # PAGE 3–1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections...................................................... 8 3–2 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM 6 Methodology) .......... 9 3–3 Roadway Link Capacities ............................................................................................... 10 3–4 Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service ............................................................................ 11 3–5 Existing Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ............................................... 12 5–1 Project Traffic Generation Forecast ................................................................................ 16 6–1 Location and Description of Cumulative Projects.......................................................... 19 6–2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Generation Forecast .......................................................... 20 8–1 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis .................................. 23 8–2 Existing Plus Project Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ........................... 24 9–1 Year 2020 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................................... 27 9–2 Year 2020 Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ............................................ 28 10–1 Project Driveway Peak Hour Levels of Service Summary ............................................ 31 10–2 Drive-Through Lane Queuing Analysis Summary ........................................................ 32 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CHICK-FIL-A MAIN STREET PROJECT Orange, California April 10, 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION This traffic impact analysis addresses the potential traffic impacts and circulation needs associated with the proposed Chick-fil-A Main Street Project (hereinafter referred to as Project). The Project proposes to demolish the existing vacant structure on the site and construct a 4,563 square-foot (SF) Chick-fil-A restaurant with drive-through window. A total of 48 parking spaces will be provided on site. The Project site is generally located on the southwest quadrant of Main Street and Almond Avenue in the City of Orange, California. This report documents the findings and recommendations of a traffic impact analysis conducted by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to determine the potential impacts associated with the Project. The traffic analysis evaluates the existing operating conditions at five (5) key st udy intersections and four (4) key roadway segments within the project vicinity, estimates the trip generation potential of the Project, and forecasts future operating conditions without and with the proposed Project. Where necessary, intersection improvements/mitigation measures are identified. This traffic report satisfies the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, and is consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the most current Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Orange County. The Scope of Work for this traffic study, which is included in Appendix A, was developed in conjunction with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff. The project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area roadways and intersections was performed. Existing traffic information has been collected at five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments on a “typical” weekday for use in the preparation of intersection and roadway segment level of service calculations. Information concerning cumulative projects (planned and/or approved) in the vicinity of the proposed Project has been researched at the City of Orange. Based on our research, there are eleven (11) cumulative projects in the City of Orange within the vicinity of the subject site. These eleven (11) planned and/or approved cumulative projects were considered in the cumulative traffic analysis for this project. This traffic report analyzes existing and future weekday daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic conditions for a near-term (Year 2020) traffic setting upon completion of the proposed Project. Daily and peak hour traffic forecasts for the Year 2020 horizon year have been projected by increasing existing traffic volumes by an annual growth rate of one percent (1.0%) per year and adding traffic volumes generated by eleven (11) cumulative projects. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 2 1.1 Study Area The five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments selected for evaluation were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The intersections and roadway segments listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. It should be noted that each key study intersection and roadway segment is located within the City of Orange. Key Study Intersections 1. Main Street at Chapman Avenue 2. Feldner Road at Almond Avenue 3. Main Street at Almond Avenue 4. Batavia Street at Almond Avenue 5. Main Street at Palmyra Avenue Key Roadway Segments A. Main Street, between Chapman Avenue and Almond Avenue B. Almond Avenue, between Feldner Road and Main Street C. Almond Avenue, between Main Street and Batavia Street D. Main Street, between Almond Avenue and Palmyra Avenue Figure 1-1 presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the proposed Project and depicts the study locations and surrounding street system. The Level of Service (LOS) investigations at these key locations were used to evaluate the potential traffic-related impacts associated with area growth, cumulative projects and the proposed Project. When necessary, this report recommends intersection and/or roadway segment improvements that may be required to accommodate future traffic volumes and restore/maintain an acceptable Level of Service and/or mitigate the impact of the project. Included in this Traffic Impact Analysis are:  Existing traffic counts,  Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assignment,  Estimated cumulative project traffic generation/distribution/assignment,  Daily, AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing conditions,  Daily, AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing plus project conditions,  Daily, AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for future (Year 2020) conditions without and with project traffic,  Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation,  Drive-Through Queuing Analysis  Recommended Improvements, and  Congestion Management Program (CMP) Analysis. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 3 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project site is generally located on the southwest quadrant of Main Street and Almond Avenue in the City of Orange, California. Figure 2-1 presents an aerial depiction of the existing site, which shows the existing vacant restaurant building to be demolished. Figure 2-2 presents the proposed site plan for the proposed Project, prepared by CRHO Architects. Review of the proposed site plan indicates that the proposed Project will consist of a 4,563 SF Chick-fil-A restaurant with drive-through window and drive-through queue storage of 17 vehicles. A total of 48 parking spaces will be provided on site and parking is restricted along both the Main Street and Almond Avenue Project frontages. The proposed Project is expected to be constructed and fully occupied by the Year 2020. 2.1 Site Access As shown in Figure 2-2, access to the Project site will be provided via one (1) unsignalized, full- access driveway located along Almond Avenue (Project Driveway No. 1) and one (1) unsignalized, right-turn in/right-turn out only driveway located along Main Street (Project Driveway No. 2). LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 4 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing Street System Regional access to the site is provided via the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, the Orange (SR-57) Freeway, and the Garden Grove (SR-22) Freeway. The principal local network of streets serving the proposed Project includes Chapman Avenue, Main Street and Almond Avenue. The following discussion provides a brief synopsis of these key area streets. The descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. Chapman Avenue is generally a six-lane, divided roadway west of Main Street, and generally a four-lane, divided roadway east of Main Street, oriented in the east-west direction. On-street parking is generally not permitted along this roadway within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Chapman Avenue is 40 miles per hour (mph). Traffic signals control the study intersections of Chapman Avenue at Main Street, Almond Avenue and Palmyra Avenue. Main Street is generally a four-lane, divided roadway north of Chapman Avenue and generally a six-lane, divided roadway south of Chapman Avenue, oriented in the north-south direction. Main Street borders the project site to the east and will provide access to the site via one (1) unsignalized, right-turn in/right-turn out only driveway. On-street parking is generally not permitted along this roadway within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Main Street is 35 mph north of Chapman Avenue and 40 mph south of Chapman Avenue. An OCTA bus stop is located along the west side of Main Street immediately south of the Project site. Almond Avenue is generally a two-lane, undivided roadway, oriented in the east-west direction. Almond Avenue borders the Project site to the north and will provide access to the site via one (1) unsignalized, full-access driveway. On-street parking is not permitted along both sides of this roadway along project frontage. However, parking is generally permitted along the remainder of Almond Avenue within the vicinity of the Project. The posted speed limit on Almond Avenue is 30 mph west of Main Street and 25 mph east of Main Street. A traffic signal controls the study intersection of Almond Avenue at Main Street. Figure 3-1 presents an inventory of the existing roadway conditions for the arterials and intersections evaluated in this report. This figure identifies the number of travel lanes for key arterials, as well as intersection configurations and controls for the key area study intersections. 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments have been identified as the locations at which to evaluate existing and future traffic operating conditions. Some portion of potential project-related traffic will pass through each of these intersections/roadway segments, and their analysis will reveal the expected relative impacts of the project. These key intersections and roadway segments were selected for evaluation based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 5 Existing daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments evaluated in this report were conducted by Transportation Studies Inc. in March 2018. Figures 3-2 and 3-3 illustrate the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the five (5) key study intersections. Figure 3-3 also presents the existing average daily traffic volumes for the four (4) key roadway segments in the vicinity of the proposed Project. Appendix B contains the detailed peak hour count sheets for the key intersections evaluated in this report. Appendix B also contains the average daily traffic volumes for the key roadway segments. 3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions Existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the five (5) key study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections and the methodology outlined in Chapter 20 of the HCM 6 for two-way stop-controlled intersections, and the methodology outlined in Chapter 21 of the HCM 6 for all-way stop-controlled intersections. 3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) In conformance with City of Orange requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the key signalized study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU technique is intended for signalized intersection analysis and estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal (green) time and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. Per City of Orange requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for through and all turn lanes. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.05 was added to each Level of Service calculation. The ICU value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning movements. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range and are shown in Table 3-1. 3.3.2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) The HCM unsignalized methodology for stop-controlled intersections was utilized for the analysis of the unsignalized intersections. LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections differ from LOS criteria for signalized intersections as signalized intersections are designed for heavier traffic and therefore a greater delay. Unsignalized intersections are also associated with more uncertainty for users, as delays are less predictable, which can reduce users’ delay tolerance. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 6 3.3.2.1 Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections Two-way stop-controlled intersections are comprised of a major street, which is uncontrolled, and a minor street, which is controlled by stop signs. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay. The control delay by movement, by approach, and for the intersection as a whole is estimated by the computed capacity for each movement. LOS is determined for each minor-street movement (or shared movement) as well as major-street left turns. The worst side street approach delay is reported. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole or for major-street approaches, as it is assumed that major-street through vehicles experience zero delay. The HCM control delay value range for two-way stop- controlled intersections is shown in Table 3-2. 3.3.2.2 All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections All-way stop -controlled intersections require every vehicle to stop at the intersection before proceeding. Because each driver must stop, the decision to proceed into the intersection is a function of traffic conditions on the other approaches. The time between subsequent vehicle departures depends on the degree of conflict that results between the vehicles and vehicles on the other approaches. This methodology determines the control delay for each lane on the approach, computes a weighted average for the whole approach, and computes a weighted average for the intersection as a whole. Level of service (LOS) at the approach and intersection levels is based solely on control delay. The HCM control delay value range for all-way stop -controlled intersections is shown in Table 3-2. 3.4 Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio Method of Analysis (Roadway Segments) Existing daily operating conditions for the four (4) key roadway segments have been investigated according to the daily volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio of each link. The daily V/C relationship is used to estimate the LOS of the roadway segment with the volume based on the 24-hour traffic count data and the capacity based on the City of Orange General Plan Circulation and Mobility Element street classifications. The roadway link capacity of each street classification according to the City of Orange General Plan Circulation and Mobility Element is presented in Table 3-3, along with the six corresponding service levels and associated V/C ratios. 3.5 Level of Service Criteria According to the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak commute hours on all intersections and LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained on a daily basis on all roadway segments. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 7 3.6 Existing Level of Service Results 3.6.1 Intersections Table 3-4 summarizes the existing peak hour service level calculations for the five (5) key study intersections based on existing traffic volumes and current street geometry. Review of Table 3-4 indicates that all five (5) key study intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Appendix C presents the ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the five (5) key study intersections for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. 3.6.2 Roadway Segments Table 3-5 summarizes the existing service level calculations for the four (4) key roadway segments based on existing 24-hour traffic volumes and current roadway geometry. The first column (1) shows the number of lanes, the second column (2) shows the arterial classification and the third column (3) shows the existing LOS “E” capacity. The fourth column (4) shows the daily volume, V/C ratio and resulting level of service. Review of Table 3-5 indicates that all four (4) key roadway segments currently operate at acceptable LOS A on a daily basis. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 8 TABLE 3-1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1 Level of Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization Value (V/C) Level of Service Description A ≤ 0.60 EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one red light, and no approach phase is fully used. B 0.61 – 0.70 VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C 0.71 – 0.80 GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D 0.81 – 0.90 FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. E 0.91 – 1.00 POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. F > 1.00 FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Potentially very long delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. 1 Source: Transportation Research Board Circular 212 – Interim Materials on Highway Capacity. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 9 TABLE 3-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6 METHODOLOGY)2,3 Level of Service (LOS) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Delay Per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Description A ≤ 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 and ≤ 15.0 Short traffic delays C > 15.0 and ≤ 25.0 Average traffic delays D > 25.0 and ≤ 35.0 Long traffic delays E > 35.0 and ≤ 50.0 Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion 2 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 20: Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. The LOS criteria apply to each lane on a given approach and to each approach on the minor street. LOS is not calculated for major-street approaches or for the intersection as a whole. 3 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 21: All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. For approaches and intersection-wide assessment, LOS is defined solely by control delay. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 10 TABLE 3-3 ROADWAY LINK CAPACITIES Facility Type Number of Lanes Level of Service Criteria With Associated Roadway Capacity Daily Values (VPD) Level of Service (LOS) A B C D E 4 F Principal 8-lanes divided 45,000 52,500 60,000 67,500 75,000 -- Major 6-lanes divided 33,900 39,400 45,000 50,600 56,300 -- Primary 4-lanes divided 22,500 26,300 30,000 33,800 37,500 -- Secondary 4-lanes undivided 14,400 16,800 19,200 21,600 24,000 -- Collector 2-lanes undivided 7,200 8,400 9,600 10,800 12,000 -- V/C Ratio ≤ 0.60 0.61-0.70 0.71-0.80 0.81-0.90 0.91-1.00 ≥ 1.00 Notes:  VPD = vehicles per day  VPH = vehicles per hour 4 Source: City of Orange General Plan; Circulation and Mobility. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 11 TABLE 3-4 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE Key Intersection Time Period Jurisdiction Minimum Acceptable LOS Control Type ICU/HCM LOS 1. Main Street at AM Orange D 8 Phase 0.654 B Chapman Avenue PM Signal 0.657 B 2. Feldner Road at AM Orange D All-Way 8.4 s/v A Almond Avenue PM Stop 8.6 s/v A 3. Main Street at AM Orange D 5 Phase 0.475 A Almond Avenue PM Signal 0.455 A 4. Batavia Street at AM Orange D All-Way 20.0 s/v C Almond Avenue PM Stop 18.0 s/v C 5. Main Street at AM Orange D 5 Phase 0.521 A Palmyra Avenue PM Signal 0.467 A Notes:  s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay)  BOLD ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values indicate unacceptable service level LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 12 TABLE 3-5 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Key Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Min. Acc. LOS (1) No. of Existing Lanes (2) Arterial Classification (3) Existing Capacity at LOS “E” (4) Existing Traffic Conditions Daily Volume V/C Ratio LOS A. Main Street between Chapman Ave and Almond Ave Orange D 6D Major 56,300 28,698 0.510 A B. Almond Avenue between Feldner Road and Main Street Orange D 2U Collector 12,000 2,453 0.204 A C. Almond Avenue between Main Street and Batavia Street Orange D 2U Collector 12,000 7,093 0.591 A D. Main Street between Almond Ave and Palmyra Ave Orange D 6D Major 56,300 28,578 0.508 A LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 13 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the proposed Project, a multi-step process has been utilized. The first step is trip generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing traffic on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is forecast by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the project development tabulation. The second step of the forecasting process is trip distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/anticipated travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the proposed Project is isolated by comparing operational (LOS) conditions at selected key intersections using expected future traffic volumes with and without forecast project traffic. The need for site- specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated and the significance of the project’s impacts identified. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 14 5.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 5.1 Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 10th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2017]. Table 5-1 summarizes the trip generation rates used in forecasting the vehicular trips generated by the proposed Project and also presents the Project’s forecast peak hour and daily traffic volumes. As shown, the trip generation potential of the Project was estimated using ITE Land Use 934: Fast-Food Restaurant With Drive-Through trip rates. Review of Table 5-1 indicates that the proposed Project is forecast to generate 1,612 daily trips, with 93 trips (47 inbound, 46 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 74 trips (38 inbound, 36 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a “typical” weekday. Please note that the aforementioned overall project trip generation includes adjustments for pass-by per the Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, published by ITE (2014), to account for trips that are already in the everyday traffic stream on the adjoining streets (i.e. Main Street and Almond Avenue) and will stop as they pass by the project site as a matter of convenience on their path to another destination. Per the Trip Generation Handbook, a pass-by reduction factor of 49% and 50% is recommended for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively for fast-food restaurants with drive- through land uses. The daily pass-by percentage was estimated to be 25%. 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 5-1 illustrates the general, directional traffic distribution pattern for the proposed Project. Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the project site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations:  directional flows on the freeways in the immediate vicinity of the project site (i.e. I-5 Freeway, SR-57 Freeway, and SR-22 Freeway),  the site's proximity to major traffic carriers (i.e. Chapman Avenue, Main Street, etc.),  expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of traffic signals, and  ingress/egress availability at the project site. The anticipated AM and PM peak hour project traffic volumes associated with the Project are presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3, respectively. Figure 5-3 also presents the daily project traffic volumes for the Project. The traffic volume assignments presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3 reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown in Figure 5-1 and the traffic generation forecast presented in Table 5-1. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 15 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The existing plus project traffic conditions have been generated based upon existing conditions and the estimated project traffic. These forecast traffic conditions have been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, which require that the potential impacts of a Project be evaluated upon the circulation system as it currently exists. This traffic volume scenario and the related intersection capacity analyses will identify the roadway improvements necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impacts of the Project, if any. Figures 5-4 and 5-5 present projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the five (5) key study intersections and two (2) Project driveways with the addition of the trips generated by the proposed Project to existing traffic volumes, respectively. Figure 5-5 also presents the existing plus project daily traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 16 TABLE 5-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST 5 ITE Land Use Code / Project Description Daily 2-Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Generation Factors:  934: Fast-Food Restaurant With Drive-Thru (TE/1000 SF) 470.95 20.50 19.69 40.19 16.99 15.68 32.67 Generation Forecast:  Chick-fil-A Restaurant With Drive-Thru (4,563 SF) 2,149 93 90 183 77 72 149 Pass-By (Daily: 25%, AM: 49%, PM: 50%)6 -537 -46 -44 -90 -39 -36 -75 Subtotal 1,612 47 46 93 38 36 74 Total Traffic Generation Forecast 1,612 47 46 93 38 36 74 Note:  TE/1000 SF = trip end per thousand square feet 5 Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017). 6 Source: Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, published by ITE (2014). LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 17 6.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 6.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Horizon year, background traffic growth estimates have been calculated using an ambient traffic growth factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future cumulative projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to the development of projects outside the study area. The future growth in traffic volumes has been calculated at one percent (1.0%) per year. Applied to the Year 2018 existing traffic volumes, this factor results in a 2.0% growth in existing volumes to the near-term horizon year 2020. 6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics In order to make a realistic estimate of future on-street conditions prior to implementation of the proposed Project, the status of other known development projects (cumulative projects) in the vicinity of the proposed Project has been researched at the City of Orange. With this information, the potential impact of the proposed Project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. Based on our research, there are eleven (11) cumulative projects in the City of Orange within the vicinity of the subject site that have either been built, but not yet fully occupied, or are being processed for approval. These eleven (11) cumulative projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting. Table 6-1 provides a brief description for each of the eleven (11) cumulative projects. Figure 6-1 graphically illustrates the location of the cumulative projects. These cumulative projects are expected to generate vehicular traffic, which may affect the operating conditions of the key study intersections and/or roadway segments. Table 6-2 presents the trip generation for the eleven (11) cumulative projects. As shown in Table 6- 2, the eleven (11) cumulative projects are forecast to generate a total of 16,634 daily trips, with 1,076 trips (133 inbound and 943 outbound) forecast during the AM peak hour and 1,321 trips (945 inbound and 376 outbound) forecast during the PM peak hour. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 18 6.3 Year 2020 Traffic Volumes The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes associated with the eleven (11) cumulative projects are presented in Figures 6-2 and 6-3, respectively. Figure 6-3 also presents the daily cumulative project traffic volumes. Figures 6-4 and 6-5 present the AM and PM peak hour cumulative traffic volumes (existing traffic + ambient growth traffic + cumulative project traffic) at the five (5) key study intersections for the Year 2020, respectively. Figure 6-5 also presents the Year 2020 daily cumulative traffic volumes. Figures 6-6 and 6-7 illustrate the Year 2020 forecast AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, with the inclusion of the trips generated by the proposed Project, respectively. Figure 6-7 also presents the Year 2020 daily cumulative plus project traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 19 TABLE 6-1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS 7 No. Description Location/Address Size City of Orange 1. 3800 Chapman Apartments 3800 Chapman Avenue 280 DU Apartments 2. Orange Art of Dentistry 2006 West Chapman Avenue 2,565 SF Dentist Office 3. Woody’s Diner 2145 West Chapman Avenue 3,400 SF Restaurant 4. 7-11 Gas Station 2245 West Chapman Avenue 2,400 SF Conv. Store and Gas Station 5. City Plaza 1 West City Boulevard 335 DU Apartments 165 Room Hotel 6. City Parkway West Apartments 500 & 600 City Parkway 220 Apartments 7. Town and Country Apartments and Townhomes 702 West Town and Country Road 653 DU Apartments 74 DU Townhomes 8. 999 Town and Country Apartments 999 Town and Country Road 262 DU Apartments 9. Eleven10 Apartment Homes 1110 Town and Country Road 260 DU Apartments 10. The Terrace Apartments SEC of Chapman Avenue and Lewis Street 167 DU Apartments 28 DU Townhomes 11. Marriott Dual Brand Hotel 3000 West Chapman Avenue 300 Room Hotel 3,000 SF Restaurant 7 Source: City of Orange Planning Department staff. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 20 TABLE 6-2 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST 8 No. Cumulative Project Description Daily Two-Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total 1. 3800 Chapman Apartments 9 1,490 25 97 122 90 49 139 2. Orange Art of Dentistry 89 5 2 7 3 6 9 3. Woody’s Diner 286 17 14 31 11 8 19 4. 7-11 Gas Station 749 18 18 36 20 20 40 5. City Plaza 10 3,130 80 152 232 158 107 265 6. City Parkway West Apartments 11 1,170 19 76 95 70 39 109 7. Town and Country Apartments and Townhomes 12 2,589 -198 255 57 238 -90 148 8. 999 Town and Country Apartments 13 1,742 26 108 134 105 58 163 9. Eleven10 Apartment Homes 14 1,729 26 107 133 104 57 161 10. The Terrace Apartments 15 849 17 44 61 42 27 69 11. Marriott Dual Brand Hotel 2,811 98 70 168 104 95 199 Total Cumulative Projects Trip Generation Forecast 16,634 133 943 1,076 945 376 1,321 8 Unless otherwise noted, Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2017)]. 9 Source: 3800 Chapman Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. 10 Source: City Plaza Project Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. 11 Source: City Parkway West Apartments Project Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. 12 Source: Town and Country Apartments and Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. 13 Source: 999 Town & Country Apartments Project Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. 14 Source: 1100 Town & Country Project Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. 15 Source: The Terrace Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by LLG Engineers. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 21 7.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The relative impact of the proposed Project during the AM peak hour/PM peak hour and on a daily basis was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments, without, then with the proposed Project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume-to- capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection and roadway segment. The significance of the potential impacts of the Project at each key intersection and key roadway segment was then evaluated using the following traffic impact criteria. 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds Impacts to local and regional transportation systems located in the City of Orange are considered significant if: Intersections:  An unacceptable peak hour Level of Service (LOS) at any of the key intersections is projected. According to the City’s Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak hours on all intersections; and  The project increases traffic demand at the study intersection by 1% of capacity (ICU increase ≥ 0.010), causing or worsening LOS E or LOS F (ICU > 0.900). Roadway Segments:  An unacceptable daily Level of Service (LOS) at any of the key roadway segments is projected. According to the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element and stated in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained on a daily basis on all roadway segments; and  The project increases traffic demand at the roadway segment by 1% of capacity (V/C increase ≥ 0.010), causing or worsening LOS E or LOS F (V/C > 0.900). 7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios The following scenarios are those for which volume/capacity calculations have been performed at the five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments for existing plus project and near-term (Year 2020) traffic conditions: (a) Existing Traffic Conditions; (b) Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions; (c) Scenario (b) with Improvements, if necessary; (d) Near-Term (Year 2020) Cumulative Traffic Conditions, (e) Near-Term (Year 2020) Cumulative plus Project Traffic Conditions; and (f) Scenario (e) with Improvements, if necessary. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 22 8.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ANALYSIS The following summarizes the “Existing Plus Project” level of service results for the five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments. 8.1 Intersections Table 8-1 summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the five (5) key study intersections for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values in Table 8-1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 3-4). The second column (2) lists existing plus project traffic conditions. The third column (3) shows the increase in ICU and/or Delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Columns (2) and (3) of Table 8-1 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five (5) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. Appendix C also presents the existing plus project ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the five (5) key study intersections for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. 8.2 Roadway Segments Table 8-2 summarizes the roadway segment level of service results at the four (4) key roadway segments for existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) shows the number of lanes, the second column (2) shows the arterial classification and the third column (3) shows the existing LOS “E” capacity. The fourth column (4) presents a summary of existing daily traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 3-5). The fifth column (5) lists existing plus project daily traffic conditions. Column (5) also shows the increase in V/C ratio value due to the added daily project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. 8.2.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Column 5 of Table 8-2 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The four (4) key roadway segments currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable service level on a daily basis with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 23 TABLE 8-1 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Key Intersections Time Period Minimum Acceptable LOS (1) Existing Traffic Conditions (2) Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions (3) Project Significant Impact (4) Existing Plus Project With Mitigation ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS 1. Main Street at AM D 0.654 B 0.666 B 0.012 No -- -- Chapman Avenue PM 0.657 B 0.660 B 0.003 No -- -- 2. Feldner Road at AM D 8.4 s/v A 8.4 s/v A 0.0 s/v No -- -- Almond Avenue PM 8.6 s/v A 8.7 s/v A 0.1 s/v No -- -- 3. Main Street at AM D 0.475 A 0.501 A 0.026 No -- -- Almond Avenue PM 0.455 A 0.472 A 0.017 No -- -- 4. Batavia Street at AM D 20.0 s/v C 20.4 s/v C 0.4 s/v No -- -- Almond Avenue PM 18.0 s/v C 18.3 s/v C 0.3 s/v No -- -- 5. Main Street at AM D 0.521 A 0.523 A 0.002 No -- -- Palmyra Avenue PM 0.467 A 0.469 A 0.002 No -- -- Notes:  s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay)  BOLD ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values indicate unacceptable service level LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 24 TABLE 8-2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Key Roadway Segment Min. Acc. LOS (1) No. of Existing Lanes (2) Arterial Classification (3) Existing Capacity at LOS “E” (4) Existing Traffic Conditions (5) Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Daily Volume V/C Ratio LOS Daily Volume V/C Ratio LOS Inc. Adverse (Yes/No) A. Main Street between Chapman Avenue and Almond Avenue D 6D Major 56,300 28,698 0.510 A 29,464 0.523 A 0.013 No B. Almond Avenue between Feldner Road and Main Street D 2U Collector 12,000 2,453 0.204 A 3,622 0.302 A 0.098 No C. Almond Avenue between Main Street and Batavia Street D 2U Collector 12,000 7,093 0.591 A 7,254 0.605 B 0.014 No D. Main Street between Almond Avenue and Palmyra Avenue D 6D Major 56,300 28,578 0.508 A 29,223 0.519 A 0.011 No LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 25 9.0 YEAR 2020 PLUS PROJECT ANALYSIS The following summarizes the “Year 2020 Plus Project” level of service results for the five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments. 9.1 Intersections Table 9-1 summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the five (5) key study intersections for Year 2020 traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values in Table 9-1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 3-4). The second column (2) lists projected cumulative traffic conditions (existing plus ambient traffic plus cumulative project traffic) based on existing intersection geometry, but without any traffic generated from the proposed Project. The third column (3) presents forecast Year 2020 near-term traffic conditions with the addition of Project traffic. The fourth column (4) shows the increase in ICU and/or Delay value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. 9.1.1 Year 2020 Cumulative Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Year 2020) cumulative traffic conditions indicates that the addition of ambient traffic growth and cumulative project traffic will not adversely impact any of the five (5) key study intersections. The five (5) key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of ambient traffic growth and cumulative project traffic. 9.1.2 Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Columns (3) and (4) of Table 9-1 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five (5) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2020 cumulative traffic. Appendix C also presents the Year 2020 plus project ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the five (5) key study intersections. 9.2 Roadway Segments Table 9-2 summarizes the roadway segment level of service results at the four (4) key roadway segments for Year 2020 traffic conditions. The first column (1) shows the number of lanes, the second column (2) shows the arterial classification and the third column (3) shows the existing LOS “E” capacity. The fourth column (4) presents a summary of projected Year 2020 cumulative daily traffic conditions. The fifth column (5) lists Year 2020 plus project daily traffic conditions. Column (5) also shows the increase in V/C ratio value due to the added daily project trips and indicates LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 26 whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS standards and significant impact criteria defined in this report. 9.2.1 Year 2020 Cumulative Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Year 2020) cumulative traffic conditions indicates that the addition of ambient traffic growth and cumulative project traffic will not adversely impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments on a daily basis under Year 2020 Cumulative traffic conditions (i.e. existing plus ambient traffic plus cumulative project traffic). The four (4) key roadway segments currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable level of service on a daily basis with the addition of ambient traffic growth and cumulative project traffic. 9.2.2 Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Column 5 of Table 9-2 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments on a daily basis under Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. The four (4) key roadway segments currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service on a daily basis with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2020 cumulative traffic. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 27 TABLE 9-1 YEAR 2020 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Key Intersections Time Period Minimum Acceptable LOS (1) Existing Traffic Conditions (2) Year 2020 Cumulative Traffic Conditions (3) Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions (4) Project Significant Impact (5) Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project With Mitigation ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS ICU/HCM LOS Increase Yes/No ICU/HCM LOS 1. Main Street at AM D 0.654 B 0.667 B 0.678 B 0.011 No -- -- Chapman Avenue PM 0.657 B 0.702 C 0.705 C 0.003 No -- -- 2. Feldner Road at AM D 8.4 s/v A 8.4 s/v A 8.5 s/v A 0.1 s/v No -- -- Almond Avenue PM 8.6 s/v A 8.7 s/v A 8.7 s/v A 0.0 s/v No -- -- 3. Main Street at AM D 0.475 A 0.484 A 0.509 A 0.025 No -- -- Almond Avenue PM 0.455 A 0.468 A 0.485 A 0.017 No -- -- 4. Batavia Street at AM D 20.0 s/v C 21.4 s/v C 21.9 s/v C 0.5 s/v No -- -- Almond Avenue PM 18.0 s/v C 18.9 s/v C 19.2 s/v C 0.3 s/v No -- -- 5. Main Street at AM D 0.521 A 0.530 A 0.532 A 0.002 No -- -- Palmyra Avenue PM 0.467 A 0.480 A 0.482 A 0.002 No -- -- Notes:  s/v = seconds per vehicle (delay)  BOLD ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS values indicate unacceptable service level LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 28 TABLE 9-2 YEAR 2020 ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Key Roadway Segment Min. Acc. LOS (1) No. of Existing Lanes (2) Arterial Classification (3) Existing Capacity at LOS “E” (4) Year 2020 Cumulative Traffic Conditions (5) Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Daily Volume V/C Ratio LOS Daily Volume V/C Ratio LOS Inc. Adverse (Yes/No) A. Main Street between Chapman Avenue and Almond Avenue D 6D Major 56,300 30,676 0.545 A 31,442 0.558 A 0.013 No B. Almond Avenue between Feldner Road and Main Street D 2U Collector 12,000 2,502 0.209 A 3,671 0.306 A 0.097 No C. Almond Avenue between Main Street and Batavia Street D 2U Collector 12,000 7,235 0.603 B 7,396 0.616 B 0.013 No D. Main Street between Almond Avenue and Palmyra Avenue D 6D Major 56,300 30,413 0.540 A 31,058 0.552 A 0.012 No LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 29 10.0 SITE ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION EVALUATION 10.1 Site Access Evaluation As shown previously in Figure 2-2, access to the Project site will be provided via one (1) unsignalized, full-access driveway located along Almond Avenue (Project Driveway No. 1) and one (1) unsignalized, right-turn in/right-turn out only driveway located along Main Street (Project Driveway No. 2). Table 10-1 summarizes the intersection operations at the proposed project driveways for near-term (Year 2020) traffic conditions at completion and full occupancy of the proposed Project. The operations analysis for the Project driveways is based on the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM 6) unsignalized methodology. Review of Table 10-1 shows that the two (2) proposed project driveways are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours for Year 2020 traffic conditions. As such, project access will be adequate. Motorists entering and exiting the project site will be able to do so comfortably, safely, and without undue congestion. It should be noted that there is adequate width on Almond Avenue (40 feet curb to curb) and “No Stopping” restrictions on both sides of the roadway between Main Street and the Project driveway, such that westbound through traffic will not be impeded by a vehicle(s) waiting to execute a westbound left turn into the Project driveway on Almond Avenue. Furthermore, based on the volume of conflicting eastbound traffic, the westbound left turn delay at the Project driveway is very low, such that the aforementioned condition would not occur often. Appendix D presents the level of service calculation worksheets for the project driveways under Year 2020 Cumulative plus Project traffic conditions. 10.2 Internal Circulation Evaluation The on-site circulation layout of the proposed Project as illustrated in Figure 2-2 on an overall basis is adequate. Curb return radii have been confirmed and are generally adequate for small service/delivery (FedEx, UPS) trucks and trash trucks. 10.3 Drive-Through Queuing Analysis To confirm the adequacy of storage provided for the proposed drive-through lane, which consists of 17 vehicles, the results of drive-through queuing observations conducted at five (5) existing comparative Chick-fil-A restaurants were utilized. The five (5) locations consisted of the following:  Chick-fil-A Tustin, located at 2889 Park Avenue  Chick-fil-A Orange, located at 2575 N. Tustin Street  Chick-fil-A Irvine, located at 6428 Irvine Boulevard  Chick-fil-A Laguna Hills, located at 24011 El Toro Road  Chick-fil-A Corona, located at 3555 Grand Oaks LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 30 Drive-through queuing observations were conducted at each of the five (5) locations on a weekday during the morning, mid-day and evening service periods, generally between the hours of 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM, 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM, and 4:00 PM and 7:00 PM. Saturday queuing observations were also collected between 11:30 AM and 2:30 PM and 4:00 PM and 10:00 PM at only the Laguna Hills site and the Corona site. Table 10-2 summarizes the results of the drive-through queuing analysis summary for the proposed Project. Column one (1) presents the study sites and column two (2) presents the study site locations. Column three (3) presents the observed 85th percentile queue, the observed 95th percentile queue and the observed maximum queue for each site. Column four (4) compares the 85th percentile queue for each site to the proposed drive-through lane storage and indicates whether or not the proposed drive-through lane will provide adequate storage. It should be noted that the 85th percentile queue is generally utilized when designing/sizing the length of the proposed drive-through lane. Review of column 3 of Table 10-2 indicates that the five (5) study sites experienced an 85th percentile queue range between 6 vehicles and 13 vehicles. As shown in column 4 of Table 10-2, the proposed Project will provide storage for up to 17 vehicles within the proposed drive-through lane without encroaching into the drive aisle. Therefore, the 85th percentile expected queues can be accommodated without interfering with internal circulation or causing congestion to the drive aisle. It should be further noted that the proposed 17 vehicle storage drive-through lane can also accommodate the observed 95th percentile queues and the observed maximum queues of the five (5) study sites. Even though it is anticipated that the proposed drive-through lane will accommodate all potential queues on site; Chick-fil-A staff will implement the following program, on an as-needed basis during their peak operating times, to further ensure that vehicles will not queue back onto the public streets. The program consists of the following as provided by Chick-fil-A management staff:  “Our restaurants are staffed so that if the drive-thru queuing begins stacking onto the street, team members go out and assist with ordering via Chick-fil-A’s iPad ordering system. Our operators use the iPad ordering during our peak hours of 11:30 am to 1:30 pm and any additional time when needed. The iPad ordering system allows team members to take orders, receive payment, and assist with traffic movement within the parking lot. Based on data from our other comparable stores, the iPad ordering system increases the CFA drive thru speed of service by 30% than the typical speaker box. Putting people forward in the drive-through is one of our biggest competitive advantages in the market because it personally connects our team members with our valued guest. We want to continue this momentum by building a platform to supporting current and future innovations that increase capacity and put our people forward to care for our guest in every interaction. Our customers enjoy the face to face ordering over the standard drive-thru experience.” Appendix E presents the drive-through queuing study data for the five (5) existing comparative sites. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 31 TABLE 10-1 PROJECT DRIVEWAY PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY Project Driveway Time Period Intersection Control Year 2020 Plus Project Traffic Conditions HCM LOS A. Project Driveway No. 1 at AM One–Way 10.1 s/v B Almond Avenue PM Stop 9.5 s/v A B. Main Street at AM One–Way 18.1 s/v C Project Driveway No. 2 PM Stop 14.8 s/v B Note: s/v = seconds per vehicle LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 32 TABLE 10-2 DRIVE-THROUGH LANE QUEUING ANALYSIS SUMMARY (1) Study Site (2) Location (3) Number of Vehicles Observed In The Drive-Through Lane (4) Proposed Project 85th Percentile 95th Percentile Maximum Drive-Through Lane Storage Adequate For 85th Percentile (Yes/No) Chick-fil-A (City of Tustin) 2889 Park Avenue, Tustin, CA 6 13 15 17 Yes Chick-fil-A (City of Orange) 2575 N. Tustin Street, Orange, CA 11 14 15 17 Yes Chick-fil-A (City of Irvine) 6428 Irvine Boulevard, Irvine, CA 8 10 12 17 Yes Chick-fil-A (City of Laguna Hills) 24011 El Toro Road, Laguna Hills, CA 11 14 17 17 Yes Chick-fil-A (City of Corona) 3555 Grand Oaks, Corona, CA 13 13 16 17 Yes LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 33 11.0 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS For those intersections and roadway segments where projected traffic volumes are expected to result in significant cumulative impacts, this report recommends traffic improvements that change the intersection and/or roadway segments geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements involve roadway widening and/or re-striping to reconfigure (add lanes) roadways to specific approaches of a key intersection and/or roadway segments. The identified improvements are expected to:  Address the impact of existing traffic, Project traffic and future non-project (ambient traffic growth and Cumulative) traffic, and  Improve Levels of Service to an acceptable range and/or to pre-project conditions. 11.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the “Existing Plus Project” intersection capacity analysis and daily roadway segment analysis presented previously in Table 8-1 and Table 8-2, respectively, indicates that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections or the four (4) key roadway segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. 11.2 Year 2020 Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the “Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project” intersection capacity analysis and daily roadway segment analysis presented previously in Table 9-1 and Table 9-2, respectively, indicates that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections or the four (4) key roadway segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 34 12.0 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) This analysis is consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the current Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP). The CMP requires that a traffic impact analysis be conducted for any project generating 2,400 or more daily trips, or 1,600 or more daily trips for projects that directly access the CMP Highway System (HS). Per the CMP guidelines, this number is based on the desire to analyze any impacts that will be 3.0% or more of the existing CMP highway system facilities’ capacity. However, as noted in this traffic study, the proposed Project is expected to generate 1,612 daily trips, and thus does not meet the criteria required for a CMP traffic analysis. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed Project will not have any significant traffic impacts on the Congestion Management Program Highway System. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 35 13.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  Project Description – The Project site is generally located on the southwest quadrant of Main Street and Almond Avenue in the City of Orange, California. The proposed Project proposes to demolish the existing vacant structure on the site and construct a 4,563 SF Chick-fil-A restaurant with drive-through window and drive-through queue storage of 17 vehicles. A total of 48 parking spaces will be provided on site and parking is restricted along both the Main Street and Almond Avenue Project frontages. The proposed Project is expected to be constructed and fully occupied by the Year 2020. Access to the Project site will be provided via one (1) unsignalized, full-access driveway located along Almond Avenue (Project Driveway No. 1) and one (1) unsignalized, right-turn in/right- turn out only driveway located along Main Street (Project Driveway No. 2).  Study Scope – The five (5) key study intersections and four (4) key roadway segments selected for evaluation were determined based on coordination with City of Orange Traffic Engineering staff and application of the “51 or more peak hour trip threshold” criteria outlined in the City of Orange Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated August 15, 2007. The intersections and roadway segments listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. It should be noted that each key study intersection and roadway segment is located within the City of Orange. Key Study Intersections 1. Main Street at Chapman Avenue 2. Feldner Road at Almond Avenue 3. Main Street at Almond Avenue 4. Batavia Street at Almond Avenue 5. Main Street at Palmyra Avenue Key Roadway Segments A. Main Street, between Chapman Avenue and Almond Avenue B. Almond Avenue, between Feldner Road and Main Street C. Almond Avenue, between Main Street and Batavia Street D. Main Street, between Almond Avenue and Palmyra Avenue Detailed peak hour level of service analyses were prepared for Existing Traffic Conditions, Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions, Year 2020 Cumulative Traffic Conditions, and Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions at these locations.  Existing Traffic Conditions – All five (5) key study intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. All four (4) key roadway segments currently operate at acceptable LOS A on a daily basis.  Project Trip Generation – The proposed Project is forecast to generate 1,612 daily trips, with 93 trips (47 inbound, 46 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 74 trips (38 inbound, 36 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a “typical” weekday. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 36  Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics – The eleven (11) cumulative projects are forecast to generate a total of 16,634 daily trips, with 1,076 trips (133 inbound and 943 outbound) forecast during the AM peak hour and 1,321 trips (945 inbound and 376 outbound) forecast during the PM peak hour.  Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions – The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five (5) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The four (4) key roadway segments currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable service level on a daily basis with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic.  Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions – The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five (5) key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2020 cumulative traffic. The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the four (4) key roadway segments on a daily basis under Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. The four (4) key roadway segments currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service on a daily basis with the addition of Project generated traffic to Year 2020 cumulative traffic.  Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation – The proposed project driveways are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours for Year 2020 traffic conditions. As such, project access will be adequate. Motorists entering and exiting the Project site will be able to do so comfortably, safely, and without undue congestion. The on-site circulation layout of the proposed Project on an overall basis is adequate. Curb return radii have been confirmed and are generally adequate for small service/delivery (FedEx, UPS) trucks and trash trucks.  Drive-Through Queuing Analysis – The five (5) study sites experienced an 85th percentile queue range between 6 vehicles and 13 vehicles. The proposed Project will provide storage for up to 17 vehicles within the proposed drive-through lane without encroaching into the drive aisle. Therefore, the 85th percentile expected queues can be accommodated without interfering with internal circulation or causing congestion to the drive aisle. It should be further noted that the proposed 17 vehicle storage drive-through lane can also accommodate the observed 95th percentile queues and the observed maximum queues of the five (5) study sites. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.18.3939.1 Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange N:\3900\2183939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street, Orange\Report\3939 - Chick-fil-A Main Street TIA, Orange 04-10-18.doc 37 Even though it is anticipated that the proposed drive-through lane will accommodate all potential queues on site; Chick-fil-A staff will implement the following program, on an as-needed basis during their peak operating times, to further ensure that vehicles will not queue back onto the public streets. The program consists of the following as provided by Chick-fil-A management staff:  “Our restaurants are staffed so that if the drive-thru queuing begins stacking onto the street, team members go out and assist with ordering via Chick-fil-A’s iPad ordering system. Our operators use the iPad ordering during our peak hours of 11:30 am to 1:30 pm and any additional time when needed. The iPad ordering system allows team members to take orders, receive payment, and assist with traffic movement within the parking lot. Based on data from our other comparable stores, the iPad ordering system increases the CFA drive thru speed of service by 30% than the typical speaker box. Putting people forward in the drive-through is one of our biggest competitive advantages in the market because it personally connects our team members with our valued guest. We want to continue this momentum by building a platform to supporting current and future innovations that increase capacity and put our people forward to care for our guest in every interaction. Our customers enjoy the face to face ordering over the standard drive- thru experience.”  Existing Plus Project Recommended Improvements – The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections or the four (4) key roadway segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions.  Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project Recommended Improvements – The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five (5) key study intersections or the four (4) key roadway segments. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under Year 2020 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions.  Congestion Management Program (CMP) – The proposed Project will not have any significant traffic impacts on the Congestion Management Program Highway System. APPENDIX 8.8 OCTA Correspondence