Loading...
App D - Cultural Resources Assessment ASMBLD Appendix D: Cultural Resources Assessment THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | AFRICA | AUSTRALIA | ASIA WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM Cultural Resources Assessment The Terrace Apartments City of Orange, Orange County, California USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim Topo Santiago Land Grant Prepared for: Bob Ormond City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P. 9990 Santa Monica Boulevard Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Prepared by: FirstCarbon Solutions 250 Commerce, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92602 714.508.4100 Contact: Jason Brandman, Project Director Cecilia So, Project Manager Authored by: David Smith, Archaeologist April 2, 2018 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment Table of Contents FirstCarbon Solutions iii Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx Table of Contents Management Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 - Project Location and Description ...................................................................................... 3 1.2 - Natural Setting ................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: Cultural Setting ............................................................................................................ 11 2.1 - Prehistoric Background ................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 - Early Man ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1.2 - Millingstone .......................................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 - Intermediate ......................................................................................................... 12 2.1.4 - Late Prehistoric ..................................................................................................... 13 2.2 - Native American Background .......................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 - Gabrieliño ............................................................................................................. 13 Section 3: Results ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 - Record Search .................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.1 - Information Center Search ................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 - Historic Aerials ..................................................................................................... 15 3.1.3 - Native American Heritage Commission Record Search ........................................ 16 3.1.4 - Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History .................................................. 16 3.2 - Pedestrian Survey ............................................................................................................ 16 Section 4: Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................ 17 4.1 - Summary ......................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 - Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 17 4.3 - Inadvertent Discovery Procedures .................................................................................. 17 4.3.1 - Accidental Discovery of Cultural Resources ......................................................... 17 Section 5: References ................................................................................................................... 19 List of Appendices Appendix A: Records Search Appendix B: Native American Correspondence B.1 - Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search B.2 - Native American Information Request Letters B.3 - Native American Information Request Letter Responses Appendix C: Paleontological Report Appendix D: Regulatory Framework List of Tables Table 1: Cultural Resources Reports within a 0.25-mile Radius of the Project Area ............................ 15 City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Table of Contents Cultural Resources Assessment iv FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx List of Exhibits Exhibit 1: Regional Location Map ............................................................................................................ 5 Exhibit 2: Local Vicinity Map, Topographic Base ..................................................................................... 7 Exhibit 3: Local Vicinity Map, Aerial Base ............................................................................................... 9 City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment Management Summary FirstCarbon Solutions 1 Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The results of the records search indicate the project area has never been the subject of an archaeological or historical study and that there are no known archaeological resources on or within one-quarter mile radius of the project area. A review of historical aerials shows that the buildings on the project are at least 45 years of age. Their exact construction date is unknown at this time. A review of paleontological records shows that sensitive fossiliferous sediments could be encountered during deep construction excavation on the project. A review of historical aerials shows that the buildings on the project are at least 45 years of age. Their exact construction date is unknown at this time. The existing buildings on the project area will require evaluation by a qualified architectural historic to determine their age and historic significance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A qualified paleontologist should be retained and, in consultation with the contractor, determine the duration that paleontological monitoring should be conducted during construction. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment Introduction FirstCarbon Solutions 3 Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 - Project Location and Description The project site is bounded by Chapman Avenue to the north, City Parkway West to the south and east, and S. Lewis Street to the west in the City of Orange, California (Exhibits 1–3). The project proposes to develop an additional 197 residential dwelling units in six new structures. The existing project has 441 apartment units in eight buildings. There are 821 existing parking stalls, the construction of the project will remove 302 stalls and add 719 parking stalls for a total of 1,238 parking stalls. The project proposes to designate 15 percent of the project area as open space (approximately 110,258 square feet). 1.2 - Natural Setting The project area is located entirely within a built environment in the City of Orange, California. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ! Orange C ou nt y S an B ernardi no C ount y Orange County Los Angeles County ·|}þ91 ·|}þ83 ·|}þ91 ·|}þ55 ·|}þ57 ·|}þ241 ·|}þ261 ·|}þ241 !"#$405 !"#$5 Or a n g e Co u n t yRi v e r s i d e Co u n t y ·|}þ60 ·|}þ110 %&'(710 %&'(5 %&'(605 %&'(10 %&'(5 %&'(405 5 ·|}þ22 ·|}þ133 ·|}þ1 ·|}þ1 Prado Flood Control Basin Santiago Reservoir Cleveland National Forest San Dimas CovinaAlhambra El Monte Pomona Ontario East Los Angeles Walnut Chino Commerce Whittier Norwalk Yorba Linda Fullerton Anaheim Orange Long Beach Garden Grove Seal Beach Santa Ana Fountain Valley Huntington Beach Costa Mesa Irvine Lake Forest Newport Beach Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel San Juan Capistrano Bell Chino Hills Montclair Laguna Woods Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map 5052.5 Miles ! Text Project Site Source: Census 2000 Data, The CaSIL, FCS GIS 2016. I CITY TERRACE ASSOCIATES • TERRACE APARTMENTS CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 50230001 • 08/2017 | 1_regional.mxd Project Site THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.mxd Exhibit 2 Local Vicinity Map Topographic Base Source: USGS Anaheim (1981) 7.5' Quadrangle / Santiago de Santa Ana Land Grant CITY TERRACE ASSOCIATES • TERRACE APARTMENTS CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet Legend Project Site THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 50230001 • 08/2017 | 3_aerial.mxd Exhibit 3 Local Vicinity Map Aerial Base Source: ESRI Imagery CITY TERRACE ASSOCIATES • TERRACE APARTMENTS CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT !"#$5 ·|}þ22 Lampson AveHasterSt TheCi t y D ri v e Sout hChapman Ave LewisStCityBoulevardWestI 850 0 850425 Feet Legend Project Site THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment Cultural Setting FirstCarbon Solutions 11 Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx SECTION 2: CULTURAL SETTING Following is a brief overview of the prehistory, ethnography, and historic background, providing a context in which to understand the background and relevance of sites found in the general project area. This section is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the current resources available; rather, it serves as a general overview. Further details can be found in ethnographic studies, mission records, and major published sources, including Beardsley (1948), Bennyhoff (1950), Fredrickson (1973), Kroeber (1925), Chartkoff and Chartkoff (1984), and Moratto (1984). 2.1 - Prehistoric Background Fagan (2003), Moratto (1984) and Chartkoff and Chartkoff (1984) provide recent overviews of California archaeology and historical reviews of the inland southern California coast, among other locales. The most accepted regional chronology for coastal and the southern coast of southern California is from Wallace’s four-part Horizon format (1955), which was later updated and revised by Warren (1968), and most recently by Chartkoff and Chartkoff (1984). The latter modified the term “Period” to “Horizon,” a term more common among researchers today. Created to place temporal structure upon materialistic phases observed during archaeological syntheses, the advantages and weaknesses of southern California chronological sequences are reviewed by Warren (in Moratto 1984), Chartkoff and Chartkoff (1984), and Heizer (ed. 1978). 2.1.1 - Early Man Spanning the period from approximately 17,000 to 9,500 Before Present (BP), archaeological assemblages attributed to the Early Man Period are characterized by large projectile points and scrapers. The limited data available suggests that prehistoric populations focused on hunting and gathering, moving about the region in small nomadic groups. Technologies associated with ocean resource gathering would have likely been utilized, but the sea level during this period was lower than today, meaning that sites on the coast are inundated and unavailable for study. Californians of this period are viewed as populations of big game hunters that were mobile enough to pursue herds. The entirety of California may have been occupied near the beginning of the Holocene epoch, about 11,750 years ago. During the Holocene, sea levels rose about 60 meters between 11,750 and 7,000 years BP, due to melting of the Pleistocene ice sheet in the higher latitudes. Although the sea level was about 120 meters lower off the coast of California roughly 22,000 years ago (Milne et al 2005), sea level stabilization began about 7,000 years ago and only a slight rise has occurred since then. Pleistocene flora and fauna are regularly uncovered from sediments at the La Brea tar pits, deep construction-related excavations in coastal Orange County and in the Santa Ana watershed. Such studies reinforce the idea that much of southern California exhibited a climate similar to that of Monterey or the San Francisco Bay area during this period (Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984), with slightly drier conditions away from the coast. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Setting Cultural Resources Assessment 12 FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx 2.1.2 - Millingstone As part of the slow restabilization effect of the melting continental ice sheet, rising sea levels and other environmental changes up to the end of the Early Man Period, the southern California climate became warmer and drier. Known as the Altithermal, Fagan (2003) notes that after 8,500 BP, the climate of most of California became warmer and much drier, and remained so for 4,000 years. Native groups altered their subsistence characteristics to compensate. Characterized by the appearance of handstones and millingstones that would have been used to grind seeds, the Millingstone Period tentatively dates to between 9,500 and 3,000 BP. Artifact assemblages in early Millingstone sites reflect an emphasis on foraging subsistence systems. Because shrubby vegetative communities replaced the temperate forest, native populations would likely have shifted to seasonal rounds to take advantage of new patterns of seed ripening. Little is known about the types of cultural changes that would be needed, but the types of artifacts seen during this Period can infer the subsistence systems. Artifact assemblages typically included choppers and scraper planes, but there is a general lack of projectile points. Large projectile points began to appear in the late portion of the Millingstone Period, which suggests the development of a more diverse economy. The distribution of Millingstone sites reflects the theory that aboriginal groups may have followed a modified central- based wandering settlement pattern. In this semi-sedentary pattern, a base camp would have been occupied for a portion of the year, but small population groups seasonally occupied subsidiary camps in order to exploit resources not generally available near the base camp. Sedentism apparently increased in areas possessing an abundance of resources that were available for longer periods. Arid inland regions would have provided a more dispersed and sporadic resource base, further restricting sedentary occupations to locations near permanent water. The duration and intensity of encampment occupations increased, especially in the latter half of the period in the coastal areas. Huge shellmounds near coastal habitats indicated more intensive sedentism after 5,000 BP (Fagan 2003), suggests an increase in population. 2.1.3 - Intermediate Dating between 3,000 and 1,250 BP, the Intermediate Period represents a transitional period. Excavated assemblages retain many attributes of the Millingstone Period but with more elaborate and diverse artifact types in these deposits. Additionally, Intermediate Period sites can contain large-stemmed or notched small projectile points suggestive of bow and arrow use, especially near the end of the period, and the use of portable grinding tools continues. Intensive use of mortar and pestles signaled processing of acorns as the primary vegetative staple as opposed to a mixed diet of seeds and acorns. Because of a general lack of data, neither the settlement and subsistence systems nor the cultural evolution of this Period are well understood, but it is very likely that the nomadic ways continued. It has been proposed that sedentism increased with the exploitation of storable food resources, such as acorns, but coastal sites from the period exhibit higher fishing activity than in previous periods. The first permanently occupied villages make their appearance (Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984). City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment Cultural Setting FirstCarbon Solutions 13 Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx 2.1.4 - Late Prehistoric Extending from 1,250 BP to Spanish Contact in 1769, the Late Prehistoric Period reflects a slight increase in technological sophistication and diversity. Exploitation of marine resources continued to intensify. Assemblages characteristically contain projectile points, and toward the end of the period the size of the points decrease and notched and stemmed bases appear, which imply the use of the bow and arrow. Use of personal ornaments, such as shell beads, are widely distributed east of the coast suggesting well-organized and codified trade networks. In addition, assemblages include steatite bowls, asphaltum, grave goods, and elaborate shell ornaments. Use of bedrock milling stations was widespread during this horizon. Increased hunting efficiency and widespread exploitation of acorns provided reliable and storable food resources. Village size increases, and some of these villages may hold 1,500 persons or more (Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984). Analyses of skeletons show that the first signs of malnutrition appear in this period, signaling greater competition for food resources (Fagan 2003). The earliest part of this Period may have seen an incursion of Cupan-Takic speakers from the Great Basin country (the so-called “Shoshonean wedge” of Kroeber 1925), who may have replaced the Hokan speakers in the area. At the time of Spanish conquest, Cupan-Takic speakers were located in Orange County, western Riverside County, and the Los Angeles Basin (Gabrieliño, Juaneño and Cahuilla peoples). Serran-Takic speakers are now represented by the Serranos in the San Bernardino Mountains. Recent work (O’Neil 2002) has concluded that the “Shoshonean wedge” is misnamed: the original Los Angeles inhabitants replaced by the incoming Takic speakers may have actually been Yuman speakers (similar to those in the California Delta region of the Colorado River) and not Hokan Salinan-Seri (Chumash) speakers as was suggested by Kroeber. At the time of Spanish conquest, local Indian groups were composed of constantly moving and shifting clans and cultures. Early ethnographers applied the concept of territorial boundaries to local Indian groups purely as a conceptualization device, and the data was based on fragmented information provided to them from second-hand sources. 2.2 - Native American Background 2.2.1 - Gabrieliño The project area lies at the far eastern edge of the Gabrieliño cultural area as defined by Kroeber (1925) and Bean and Smith (1978). The Gabrieliño also spoke a language that belongs to the Cupan group of the Takic subfamily of the Uto-Aztecan language family, a language family that includes the Shoshonean groups of the Great Basin. The total Gabrieliño population 350 years ago was roughly 5,000 persons, based on an estimate of 100 small villages of 50 to 200 people apiece (Goldberg and Arnold 1988). Their range is generally thought to have been located on the Pacific coast from Malibu to San Pedro Bay and south to Aliso Creek, then east to Temescal Canyon and the San Bernardino area, then north to the headwaters of the San Gabriel River. Also included were several islands, including Catalina. This large area encompasses the city of Los Angeles, much of Rancho Cucamonga, Corona, Glendale, and Long Beach. In general, Gabrieliño peoples occupied most of the fertile bottomlands in the Los Angeles basin. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Setting Cultural Resources Assessment 14 FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx The first modern social analyses of Gabrieliño culture took place in the early part of the 20th century (Kroeber 1925), but by that time acculturation and disease had taken their toll. The population studied at that time was a mere remnant and a shadow of their cultural form prior to contact with the Spanish Missionaries. Nonetheless, the Gabrieliño are viewed as a chief-oriented society of semi-sedentary hunter-gatherers. Technology was sophisticated and reflected seasonal resource exploitation originating from village-centered territories. Influenced by the wide variety of coastal and interior environmental settings, their material culture was quite elaborate and consisted of well- made wood, bone, stone and shell items. Included among these was a hunting stick made to bring down different types of game. Located in an area of extreme environmental diversity, large villages may have been permanent, such as that found on or near Red Hill in Alta Loma, with satellite villages utilized seasonally. Their living structures were large, domed and circular thatched rooms that may have housed multiple families. The society exhibited ranked individuals, possibly chiefs, who possessed a much higher level of economic power than unranked persons did. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment Results FirstCarbon Solutions 15 Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx SECTION 3: RESULTS 3.1 - Record Search 3.1.1 - Information Center Search FCS conducted a record search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), California State University, Fullerton, California. To identify any historic properties or resources, the current inventories of the National Register of Historic Places (NR), the California Register of Historic Resources (CR), the California Historical Landmarks list (CHL), the California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI) list, and the California State Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) for Orange County were reviewed to determine the existence of previously documented local historical resources (Appendix A). According to records on file at SCCIC, no archaeological or historical sites have been recorded on or within a 0.25-mile radius of the project. There have been six technical studies conducted within the records search buffer, but none included the project area (Table 1) . Table 1: Cultural Resources Reports within a 0.25-mile Radius of the Project Area Report Number Author/Date Additional Details OR-01949 Padon, Beth, McLean, Deborah, and Strudwick, Ivan 1995 Cultural Resource Assessment for the City of Garden Grove OR-01954 Padon, Beth 1995 Archaeological Archival Review and Survey of the Co 5 and Co 6 Flood Control Channels, Anaheim, Newport, and Seal Beach USGS 7.5 Quadrangles, Orange County, California OR-01977 Duke, Curt 1999 Cultural Resource Assessment for Pacific Bell Mobile Services Facility Cm 281-09, County of Orange, California OR-02519 Houghtby, Michael A. 2001 Doj010427a, the Lacy Branch Jail Build Out, Orange County, CA OR-02899 McKenna, Jeanette A. 2003 Block at Orange Expansion Project OR-03373 Arrington, Cindy and Nancy Sikes 2006 Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring and Findings for the Qwest Network Construction Project State of California; Volumes I and II The records search also indicated that no historic or prehistoric cultural resources have been recorded within the buffer area or on the subject property. 3.1.2 - Historic Aerials An examination of historic aerials of the project area indicates that the buildings on the property first appear in a 1972 aerial. The next earliest aerial is 1963 in which most of the property appears to be City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Results Cultural Resources Assessment 16 FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx plowed fields. The actual construction date of the buildings is currently unknown; however, their appearance in the 1972 aerial indicates they are at least 45 years of age or older. 3.1.3 - Native American Heritage Commission Record Search On August 15, 2017 FCS sent a letter to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in an effort to determine whether any sacred sites are listed on its Sacred Lands File for the project area. The response from the NAHC was received on August 23, 2017 and it noted that the files search was negative for cultural resources within the project area. A list of Native American tribal members who may have additional knowledge of the project area was included with the results. These tribal members were sent letters on September 14, 2017 asking for any additional information they might have concerning the project area (Appendix B). 3.1.4 - Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History conducted a review of its paleontological records to determine the relative sensitivity of the project area for fossil remains. According to the museum: Surficial sediments at the proposed project site and in the surrounding area consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary Alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of the general floodplain of the Santa Ana River that flows just east of the proposed project area. These younger Quaternary deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, but we have a vertebrate fossil locality, LACM 1652, along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue north-northeast of the proposed project area, that produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. Our closest vertebrate fossil locality in older Quaternary sediments is LACM 4943, situated almost due east of locality LACM 1652 along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street east of the Santa Ana River, that produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8–10 feet below the surface. The museum concluded that grading or shallow construction excavations are unlikely to encounter any significant fossil remains; however, deeper excavations could encounter fossiliferous sediments and should be closely monitoring during construction (Appendix C). 3.2 - Pedestrian Survey A pedestrian survey was not conducted for this project. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment Summary and Recommendations FirstCarbon Solutions 17 Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx SECTION 4: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 - Summary The results of the records search indicate the project area has never been the subject of an archaeological or historical study and that there are no known archaeological resources on or within a 0.25-mile radius of the project area. A review of historical aerials shows that the buildings on the project are at least 45 years of age. Their exact construction date is unknown at this time. A review of paleontological records shows that sensitive fossiliferous sediments could be encountered during deep construction excavation on the project. 4.2 - Recommendations A review of historical aerials shows that the buildings on the project are at least 45 years of age. Their exact construction date is unknown at this time. The existing buildings on the project area will require evaluation by a qualified architectural historic to determine their age and historic significance under CEQA. A qualified paleontologist should be retained to consult with the contractor to determine the duration that paleontological monitoring should be conducted during construction. 4.3 - Inadvertent Discovery Procedures 4.3.1 - Accidental Discovery of Cultural Resources If human remains are encountered during excavations associated with this project, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 would be required. If archaeological resources are encountered during construction, Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would be required. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-3 would reduce impacts to a level of less than significant. Recommended Mitigation Measures MM CUL-1 If human remains are encountered during excavations associated with this project, all work shall stop within 50 feet of the find, and the County Coroner shall be notified (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code). If the coroner determines that the remains are of Native American origin, he or she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). MM CUL-2 The NAHC shall be responsible for designating the most likely descendant (MLD), who shall be responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as required by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The MLD shall make his or her recommendations within 48 hours of having been notified by the NAHC. MM CUL-3 A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to consult with the contractor to determine the duration that paleontological monitoring should be conducted during construction. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Summary and Recommendations Cultural Resources Assessment 18 FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx In the event that archaeological resources are encountered during development of this project, work near the resource shall be diverted and a qualified archaeologist shall be notified. The archaeologist will assess the significance of the find and provide mitigation recommendations. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment References FirstCarbon Solutions 19 Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx SECTION 5: REFERENCES Bean, L.J. 1972. Mukat’s People: The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Bean, L.J. 1978. Cahuilla. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California, edited by R.F. Heizer, pp. 575-587. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Bean, L.J. and C.R. Smith. 1978. Serrano. In R.F. Heizer, (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Bean, L.J. and F.C. Shipek. 1978. Luiseño. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California, edited by R.F. Heizer, pp. 550–563. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Beardsley, R.K. 1948. “Cultural Sequences in Central California Archaeology.” American Antiquity 14:1–28. Bennyhoff, J. 1950. Californian Fish Spears and Harpoons. University of California Anthropological Records 9(4):295–338. Chartkoff J.L. and K.K. Chartkoff. 1984. The Archaeology of California. Menlo Park. Stanford University Press. Fagan, B.M. 2003. Before California: An Archaeologist Looks at Our Earliest Inhabitants. New York: Alta Mira Press. Frederickson, D.A. 1973. Early Cultures of the North Coast Ranges, California. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis. Heizer, R. F., ed. 1978. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute. Hudson, Travis, Janice Timbrook, and Melissa Rempe, ed. 1978. Historic Spots in California. Menlo Park: Stanford University Press. Kroeber, A.L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bulletin 78. Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Moratto, M.J. 1984. California Archaeology. San Diego. Academic Press. O’Neil, S. 2002. The Acjachemen in the Franciscan Mission System: Demographic Collapse and Social Change. Master Thesis, Department of Anthropology, CSU-Fullerton. Strong, W.D. 1929. Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26(1):1–358. Tierra Environmental Services. 1999. Where Territories Merge: An Ethnohistoric and Ethnographic Review of Traditional Native American Territories and Traditional Cultural Properties for March Air Force Base, California. March AFB, California. On-line version. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments References Cultural Resources Assessment 20 FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx Wallace, W.J. 1955. “A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11(3):214–230. Warren, C.N. 1968. “Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast.” Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States; C. Irwin-Will, editor. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx Appendix A: Records Search THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx Appendix B: Native American Correspondence THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx B.1 - Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx B.2 - Native American Information Request Letters THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK North A   America | Euro Septembe Andrew S Gabrielen P.O. Box 3 Covina, CA Subject:  Dear And FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  alas  no Band of Mi 393   A, 91723  The Terr a rew Salas,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia ission Indians  ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  ‐ Kizh Nation nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA   y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Anthony M Gabrielen P.O. Box 6 San Gabri Subject:  Dear Anth FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  Morales  no/Tongva San 693   el, CA, 91778 The Terr a hony Morales on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia n Gabriel Band 8  ace Apartmen s,  (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  d of Mission I nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA ndians  y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Sandonne Gabrielino 106 1/2 Ju Los Angel Subject:  Dear Sand FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  e Goad  o/Tongva Nat udge John Ais es, CA, 90012 The Terr a donne Goad,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia tion  so St.,  #231   2  ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Robert Do Gabrielino P.O. Box 4 Bellflower Subject:  Dear Robe FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  orame  o Tongva  Indi 490   r, CA, 90707  The Terr a ert Dorame,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia ans of Californ ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  nia Tribal  Cou nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA uncil  y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Charles A Gabrielino 23454 Va n West Hills Subject:  Dear Char FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  lvarez  o‐Tongva  Tri b nowen Street s, CA 91307  The Terr a rles Alvarez,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia be  t  ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Sonia Joh Juaneno B P.O. Box 2 Santa Ana Subject:  Dear Soni FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  nston  Band of Missi 25628  a, CA, 92799  The Terr a a Johnston,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia on Indians   ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Matias Be Juaneno B 32161 Ave San Juan C Subject:  Dear Mat FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  elardes  Band of Missi enida Los Am Capistrano, C The Terr a ias Belardes,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia on  Indians Ac migos  CA, 92675  ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  cjachemen Na nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA ation ‐ Belard y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. des  California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Joyce Perr Juaneno B 4955 Pase Irvine, CA Subject:  Dear Joyc FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  ry  Band of Missi eo Segovia  A, 92603  The Terr a e Perry,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia on  Indians Ac ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  cjachemen Na nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA ation ‐ Belard y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. des  California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site North A   America | Euro Septembe Teresa  Ro Juaneno B 31411‐A L San Juan C Subject:  Dear Ter e FirstCarbo Study/Mit bounded  to the we The proje existing p construct stalls. The 110,258 s FCS condu University of the Nat California California existence  According within a ¼ search bu The prope Please no and is not the Natio handled b ope | Africa | A er 15, 2017  mero  Band of Missi La Matanza St Capistrano, C The Terr a sa Romero,  on Solutions ( tigated Negat by Chapman  st in the City  ct proposes t roject has 44 ion of the pro e project prop square feet).  ucted a record y, Fullerton, C tional Registe  Historical La  State Histori of previously g to records o ¼ mile radius  ffer, but none erty is entirely ote that this le t notification nal Historic P by designated Australia | Asia on  Indians Ac treet  CA, 92675  ace Apartmen (FCS) is condu tive Declarati Avenue to th of Orange, Ca to develop an 1 apartment  oject will rem poses to desig d search at th California.  To   er of Historic P ndmarks list ( c Resources I y documented on file at SCCIC of the project e included th y built out at  etter is a req  of a project  Preservation  d lead agencie a  cjachemen Na nts in the City ucting a cultu on (IS/MND) he north, City  alifornia.   additional 19 units in eight ove 302 stalls gnate 15 perc he South Cent identify any h Places (NR), t (CHL), the Ca nventory (HR d local histori C, no archaeo t. There have e project area this time, the uest for infor under Senate Act.  Project  es under CEQA ation ‐ Romer y of Orange, C ral resources for an approx Parkway Wes 97 residentia t buildings. Th s and add 719 cent of the pr tral Coastal In historic prope the California  lifornia Points RI) for Orange cal resources ological or his e been six tech a.  erefore, a ped rmation perta e Bill (SB) 18, notification a A and NEPA. ro  California   assessment  ximately 16.8 st to the sout l dwelling un here are 821  9 parking stal oject are as o nformation Ce erties or reso  Register of H s of Historica e County were s.    storical sites h hnical studies destrian surve aining to a cu , Assembly Bi and consultat www in support of 88‐acre site. T th and east, a its in six new  existing parki lls for a total  open space (a enter, Califor urces, the cu Historic Resou l Interest (CP e reviewed to have been rec s conducted w ey was not co ultural resour ill (AB) 52 or  ion requirem w.firstcarbonso Requ f an Initial  The project sit and S. Lewis S structures. T ing stalls, the of 1,238 park approximately nia State  rrent invento urces (CR), the HI) list, and th o determine t corded on or  within the rec onducted.  rces assessme Section 106 o ents are bein 1  olutions.com est Letter  te is  Street  The    king  y  ories  e  he  he  cords  ent  of  ng    If you hav relation to contact m assistance Sincerely,          David M.  Project M   FirstCarbo 250 Comm Irvine, CA     Enc: P   ve any additio o the propose me at 714.508 e.  Smith  Manager, Archa on Solutions  merce, Suite 2 A 92602  roject Map  onal informati ed project are .4100 or via e aeologist  250  ion regarding ea, we would  email at dsmi  potential his greatly appre th@fcs‐intl.c storic or cultu eciate your in om and than ural resources nput.  Please f k you for you Requ s in proximity feel free to  ur valuable  est Letter   or  North A   America | Euroope | Africa | AAustralia | Asiaa www At Records w.firstcarbonso ttachmen s Search M   olutions.com nt A:  Map  50230001 • 08/2017 | 2_topo.m xd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity MapT opographic Base Sourc e: USGS Anahe im (1981) 7.5' Quad rangle / Santiago d e Santa Ana Land Grant CIT Y T ERRACE ASSOCIAT ES • T ERRACE APART MENT S CULT URLA RESOURCES ASSESSMENT I 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Fee t Legend Project Site City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx B.3 - Native American Information Request Letter Responses THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 9/25/2017 The Terrace Apartments in the City of Orange, CA - dsmith@fcs-intl.com - Firstcarbon Solutions International Mail https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/15eba189eeaea4e8 1/1 COMPOSE Inbox (17) Starred Sent Mail Drafts (126) ATT (5) Attaboy Azusa Greens (1) Buena Vista (7) Cecilia (2) Charles (18) Cindy Dana (8) David (9) Ed (3) Ericka Frank (75) George Jason (3) JD John Kim (3) 5.28 GB (17%) of 30 GB used Manage Program Policies Powered by The Terrace Apartments in the City of Orange, CA Inbox x Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians <gabrielenoindians@yahoo.com> to me Click here to Reply or Forward Dear David M. Smith, Mr. Salas would like to go over the above project. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us at Sincerely, Brandy Salas Andrew Salas, Chairman Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation PO Box 393 Covina, CA 91723 Office: 844-390-0787 Cell: (626)926-4131 Email: gabrielenoindians@yahoo.com website: www.gabrielenoindians.org MoreMail THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx Appendix C: Paleontological Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Vertebrate Paleontology Section Telephone: (213) 763-3325 e-mail: smcleod@nhm.org 1 September 2017 FirstCarbon Solutions 250 Commerce, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92602 Attn: David M. Smith, Project Manager, Archaeologist re: Paleontological resources for the proposed Terrace Apartments Project, in the City of Orange, Orange County, project area Dear David: I have conducted a thorough search of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen data for the proposed Terrace Apartments Project, in the City of Orange, Orange County, project area as outlined on the portion of the Anaheim USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on 15 August 2017. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie within the project boundaries, but we do have localities nearby from the same sedimentary units that occur as subsurface deposits in the proposed project area. Surficial sediments at the proposed project site and in the surrounding area consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary Alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of the general floodplain of the Santa Ana River that flows just east of the proposed project area. These younger Quaternary deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, but we have a vertebrate fossil locality, LACM 1652, along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue north-northeast of the proposed project area, that produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. Our closest vertebrate fossil locality in older Quaternary sediments is LACM 4943, situated almost due east of locality LACM 1652 along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street east of the Santa Ana River, that produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8- 10 feet below the surface. Grading or very shallow excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger Quaternary alluvial sediments in the proposed project site area are unlikely to uncover significant fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations at the proposed project site area that extend down into older deposits, however, may well encounter significant vertebrate fossils. Any substantial excavations below the uppermost layers, therefore, should be closely monitored to quickly and professionally collect any specimens without impeding development. Sediment samples should also be collected and processed to determine the small fossil potential in the proposed project area. Any fossils recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations. This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of the proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential on-site survey. Sincerely, Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. Vertebrate Paleontology enclosure: invoice City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx Appendix D: Regulatory Framework THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Government agencies, including federal, state, and local agencies, have developed laws and regulations designed to protect significant cultural resources that may be affected by projects regulated, funded, or undertaken by the agency. Federal and state laws that govern the preservation of historic and archaeological resources of national, state, regional, and local significance include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition, laws specific to work conducted on federal lands includes the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA), the American Antiquities Act, and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The following Federal or CEQA criteria were used to evaluate the significance of potential impacts on cultural resources for the proposed project. An impact would be considered significant if it would affect a resource eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or the California Register of Historical Resources (CR), or if it is identified as a unique archaeological resource. Federal-Level Evaluations Federal agencies are required to consider the effects of their actions on historic properties and afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings under NEPA § 106. Federal agencies are responsible for initiating NEPA § 106 review and completing the steps in the process that are outlined in the regulations. They must determine if NHPA § 106 applies to a given project and, if so, initiate review in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO). Federal agencies are also responsible for involving the public and other interested parties. Furthermore, NHPA S106 requires that any federal or federally assisted undertaking, or any undertaking requiring federal licensing or permitting, consider the effect of the action on historic properties listed in or eligible for the NRHP. Under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 36 CFR Part 800.8, federal agencies are specifically encouraged to coordinate compliance with NEPA § 106 and the NEPA process. The implementing regulations “Protection of Historic Properties” are found in 36 CFR Part 800. Resource eligibility for listing on the NRHP is detailed in 36 CFR Part 63 and the criteria for resource evaluation are found in 36 CFR Part 60.4 [a-d]. The NHPA established the NRHP as the official federal list for cultural resources that are considered important for their historical significance at the local, state, or national level. To be determined eligible for listing in the NRHP, properties must meet specific criteria for historic significance and possess certain levels of integrity of form, location, and setting. The criteria for listing on the NRHP are significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture as present in districts, sites, buildings, structures and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. In addition, a resource must meet one or all of these eligibility criteria: a.) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx b.) Is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. c.) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master; possess high artistic values, represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. d.) That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criterion D is usually reserved for archaeological resources. Eligible properties must meet at least one of the criteria and exhibit integrity, measured by the degree to which the resource retains its historical properties and conveys its historical character. Criteria Considerations Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, buildings that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the NRHP. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: a.) A religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance. b.) A building or structure removed from its original location but which is primarily significant for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event. c.) A birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no appropriate site or building associated with his or her productive life. d.) A cemetery that derives its primary importance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events. e.) A reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived. f.) A property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own exceptional significance. g.) A property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance. Thresholds of Significance In consultation with the SHPO/THPO and other entities that attach religious and cultural significance to identified historic properties, the Agency shall apply the criteria of adverse effect to historic City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx properties within the Area of Potential Effect (APE). The Agency official shall consider the views of consulting parties and the public when considering adverse effects. Federal Criteria of Adverse Effects Under federal regulations, 36 CFR Part 800.5, an adverse effect is found when an undertaking alters, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualifies the property for inclusion in the NRHP in a manner that diminishes the integrity of the property’s location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association. Consideration will be given to all qualifying characteristics of a historic property, including those that may have been identified subsequent to the original evaluation of the property’s eligibility for listing in the NRHP. Adverse effects may include reasonably foreseeable effects caused by the undertaking that may occur later in time, be farther removed in distance, or be cumulative. According to 36 CFR Part 800.5, adverse effects on historic properties include, but are not limited to, those listed below: • Physical destruction of or damage to all or part of the property. • Alteration of a property, including restoration, rehabilitation, repair, maintenance, stabilization, hazardous material remediation, and provision of handicapped access, that is not consistent with the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties per 36 CFR Part 68 and applicable guidelines. • Removal of the property from its historic location. • Change of the character of the property’s use or of physical features within the property’s setting that contribute to its historic significance. • Introduction of visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that diminish the integrity of the property’s significant historic features. • Neglect of a property that causes its deterioration, except where such neglect and deterioration are recognized qualities of a property of religious and cultural significance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization. • Transfer, lease, or sale of property out of federal ownership or control without adequate and legally enforceable restrictions or conditions to ensure long term preservation of the property’s historic significance. If Adverse Effects Are Found If adverse effects are found, the agency official shall continue consultation as stipulated at 36 CFR Part 800.6. The agency official shall consult with the SHPO/THPO and other consulting parties to develop alternatives to the undertaking that could avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic resources. According to 36 CFR Part 800.14(d), if adverse effects cannot be avoided then standard treatments established by the ACHP may be used as a basis for Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx According to 36 CFR Part 800.11(e), the filing of an approved MOA, and appropriate documentation, concludes the § 106 process. The MOA must be signed by all consulting parties and approved by the ACHP prior to construction activities. If no adverse effects are found and the SHPO/THPO or the ACHP do not object within 30 days of receipt, the agencies’ responsibilities under § 106 will be satisfied upon completion of report and documentation as stipulated in 36 CFR Part 800.11. The information must be made available for public review upon request, excluding information covered by confidentiality provisions. State-Level Evaluation Processes An archaeological site may be considered an historical resource if it is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military or cultural annals of California per PRC § 5020.1(j) or if it meets the criteria for listing on the CR per California Code of Regulations (CCR) at Title 14 CCR § 4850. The most recent amendments to the CEQA guidelines direct lead agencies to first evaluate an archaeological site to determine if it meets the criteria for listing in the CR. If an archaeological site is an historical resource, in that it is listed or eligible for listing in the CR, potential adverse impacts to it must be considered as stated in PRC §§ 21084.1 and 21083.2(l). If an archaeological site is considered not to be an historical resource, but meets the definition of a “unique archeological resource” as defined in PRC § 21083.2, then it would be treated in accordance with the provisions of that section. With reference to PRC § 21083.2, each site found within a project area will be evaluated to determine if it is a unique archaeological resource. A unique archaeological resource is described as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets one or more of the following criteria: 1. Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information. 2. Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type. 3. Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. As used in this report, “non-unique archaeological resource” means an archaeological artifact, object, or site that does not meet the criteria for eligibility for listing on the CR, as noted in subdivision (g) of PRC § 21083.2. A non-unique archaeological resource requires no further consideration, other than simple recording of its components and features. Isolated artifacts are typically considered non-unique archaeological resources. Historic structures that have had their superstructures demolished or removed can be considered historic archaeological sites and are evaluated following the processes used for prehistoric sites. Finally, OHP recognizes an age City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx threshold of 45 years. Cultural resources built less than 45 years ago may qualify for consideration, but only under the most extraordinary circumstances. Title 14, CCR, Chapter 3 § 15064.5 is associated with determining the significance of impacts to archaeological and historical resources. Here, the term historical resource includes the following: 1. A resource listed in, or determined eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the CR (PRC § 5024.1; Title 14 CCR, § 4850 et seq.). 2. A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in PRC § 5020.1(k) or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the PRC § 5024.1(g) requirements, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. 3. Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript, which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered a historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be historically significant if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (PRC § 5024.1; Title 14 CCR § 4852) including the following: A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage. B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Typically, archaeological sites exhibiting significant features qualify for the CR under Criterion D because such features have information important to the prehistory of California. A lead agency may determine that a resource may be a historical resource as defined in PRC §§ 5020.1(j) or 5024.1 even if it is: • Not listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the CR. • Not included in a local register of historical resources pursuant to PRC § 5020.1(k). • Identified in an historical resources survey per PRC § 5024.1(g). Threshold of Significance If a project will have a significant impact on a cultural resource, several steps must be taken to determine if the cultural resource is a “unique archaeological resource” under CEQA. If analysis and/or testing determine that the resource is a unique archaeological resource and therefore subject City Terrace Associates, Ltd., L.P.—The Terrace Apartments Cultural Resources Assessment FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\5023\50230001\CRA\50230001 The Terrace Apts - CRA.docx to mitigation prior to development, a threshold of significance should be developed. The threshold of significance is a point where the qualities of significance are defined and the resource is determined to be unique under CEQA. A significant impact is regarded as the physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of the resource will be reduced to a point that it no longer meets the significance criteria. Should analysis indicate that project development will destroy the unique elements of a resource; the resource must be mitigated for under CEQA regulations. The preferred form of mitigation is to preserve the resource in-place, in an undisturbed state. However, as that is not always possible or feasible, appropriate mitigation measures may include, but are not limited to: 1. Planning construction to avoid the resource. 2. Deeding conservation easements. 3. Capping the site prior to construction. If a resource is determined to be a “non-unique archaeological resource,” no further consideration of the resource by the lead agency is necessary.