The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11.01 Billboard Ordinance 5 - Attachment 7 Mitigated Negative Declaration ATTACHMENT NO. 7 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1853-16 ORDINANCE NO. 01-19 , JAN UARY 8, 2019 Billboard Ordinance Update Proj ect MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1860-18 O��q �. GORp� AT A '�,�'4;.•��a Fp�'� G: .�'�j � ; ; * �'•. �'�r yc�..;op: .. 1eg�:�pqr co,Ai�s: .C�ti t11V'PY Lead Agency: City of Orange Community Development Department • Planning Division 300 East Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866-1591 (714)744 7220 (714) 744 7222(Fax) www.ciiyoforange.org Prepared by: FirstCarbon Solutions 1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 380 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 357 2562 - Date: November 7, 2018 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Sections Pase# MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION N0. 1860-18....................................................................v INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................v EXISTINGSETTING....................................................................................................................vi .. PROJECT DESCRIPTI N..........................................................................................................xxii BII.,LBOARD-SPECIFIC REGULATORY CONTEXT.............................................................xxx ... REQUIRED APPROVALS..............::.......................................................................................xxxiii INTENDED USES OF THIS DOCUMENT............................................................................xxxiii Fi�ures Figure 1: Regional Location Map...............................................................................................................vii Figure2: Local Vicinity Map.......................................................................................................................ix Figure 3a:Retained Billboard Location 1—West of SR 55, 100 feet south of East Katella Avenue...........xi Figure 3b:Retained Billboard Location 2—West of SR 55, 1,900 feet north of Meats Avenue...............xiii Figure 3 c:Retained Billboard Location 3—West of SR 57,250 feet south of West Chapman Avenue.....xv Figure 3d:Retained Billboard Location 4—East of SR 57, 100 feet south of the Santa Ana River.........xvii Figure 3e: Retained Billboard Location 5—East of SR 57,220 feet east of the SR 57 North onramp.....xix Figure 4a: Typical Daytime View at a Potential Removal Site.................................................................xxv Figure 4b:Typical Daytime View at a Potential Removal Site...............................................................xxvii Figure 5: Retained Billboard 1-1936 East Katella Avenue Site Plan....................................................xxxi Tables Table 1: Retained Billboard Locations.........................................................................................................vi Table 2:Billboard Dimensions ................................................................................................................xxiv Table 3: Regional Construction Emissions by Construction Activity......................................................... 16 Table 4: Orange County Landfill Suinmary................................................................................................65 Miti�ation Monitoring and Reuorting Pro�ram MIVIRP ........................................................................................................................................................75 Anpendices Appendix A:Draft Billboard Ordinance Appendix B: Photometric Analysis , Appendix C:Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Supporting Information Appendix D: City of Orange Pending Land Use Applications Appendix E: Responses to Comments iii MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION N0. 1860-18 Proiect Title: Reference Apnlication Numbers: Billboazd Ordinance Update Project ZC No. 1292-18 and MND No. 1860-18 Lead Agenc_y and Address: Contact Person and Telephone No.: City of Orange Ashley Brodkin,Associate Planner 300 E.Chapman Avenue (714)744-7238 Orange,CA 92866 Proiect Proponent and Address: Contact Person and Telephone No.: City of Orange Ashley Brodkin,Associate Planner 300 E. Chapman Avenue (714)744-7238 Orange,CA 92866 Proiect Locallon: Various sites throughout the City of Orange Existin�General Plan Desisnation: Existing Zonin�Classification: Various sites throughout the City of Orange Various sites throughout the City of Orange INTRODUCTION The City of Orange's Municipal Code (Billboard Ordinance, Municipal Code Title 5—Chapter 5.62, Signs and Billboards) does not currently allow for the construction and operation of digital display billboards within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. The City is proposing to repeal and delete Chapter 5.62, Signs and Billboards, in its entirety, and to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.36 Sign Regulations to add a new Section 1736.180 that would provide guidance for the "relocation" of existing billboards within the City. As defined in the proposed Billboard Ordinance, "relocation"includes the conversion of an existing static billboard display to a digital display, subject to the removal of other existing billboard faces, as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 5412. The purpose of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(IS/MND) is to identify potential environmental impacts from implementation of the proposed City of Orange Billboard Ordinance Update Project(referred to herein as the proposed project) within the City of Orange. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15367,the City of Orange is the Lead Agency in the preparation of this IS/MND and additional environmental review documentation required for the proposed project. The City has discretionary authority over the proposed project. The intended use of this IS/NIND is to deternune the level of environmental impacts resulting from the project; where a potentially significant impact is found, to identify mitigation measures that reduce such impacts to a less than significant level; and to provide the basis for input from public agencies, organizations,and interested members of the public. The remainder of this section provides a brief description of the project location and the characteristics of the project. Section 2 includes an environmental checklist giving an overview of the potential impacts that may result from project implementation. Each individual subsection v elaborates on the information contained in the environmental checklist, along with justification for the responses provided in the environmental checklist. EXISTING SETTING Regional Settings City of Orange is located in Orange County, California. It is surrounded by the City of Anaheim to the north and west, the City of Tustin to the south, and unincorporated Orange County to the east. The City of Orange surrounds the City of Villa Park, and also includes unincorporated County lands and County islands. Figure 1: Regional Location Map, and Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map depict surrounding jurisdictions and unincorporated areas and islands. Project Location: There are currently 11 traditional billboards in an array of sizes, ranging from 12 feet by 25 feet (300 square feet)to 20 feet by 60 feet(1,200 square feet) in the City.1 Additionally,there are three billboards located on unincorporated(County)lands that could affect viewsheds within the City.z Existing Site Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses: Retained Billboard Locations Existing billboards that are identified for retention and are subject to implementation of the proposed project/ordinance are all located along sides of freeways in the City's Freeway Corridor. The Freeway Corridor is defined as the area within the City comprised of the land within 300 feet of either edge of the right-of-way of the following freeways: California lnterstate 5 (I-5); California State Route 22 (SR-22); California State Route 55 (SR-55); and California State Route 57 (SR-57). The billboard sites in the Freeway Corridor are generally surrounded by commercial, residential, and light industrial uses, as well as various roadways. Table 1 lists the retained billboard locations, and Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map provides an aerial map that depicts surrounding land uses. Figures 3a through 3e show the daytime views of the retained billboard locations. Table 1: Retained Billboard Locations � ,� , �� _� � � ; � <Billboards. a� � a�?zf� r, �c;3 ��' ��iOC$t10D t# '"� € �r�s, P � � L�N a t�� 1 West side of SR-55, 100 feet south of East Katella Avenue 375-532-07 2 West side of SR-55, 1,900 feet north of Meats Avenue 372-642-33 3 West side of SR-57,250 feet south of West Chapman Avenue 232-032-01 4 East side of SR-57, 100 feet south of the Santa Ana River 386-381-04; 386-381-OS 5 East side of SR-57,220 feet east of the SR-57 North on ramp 386-401-14 ' Four of the eleven billboards were built after 1995 as part of a 1995 Settlement Agreement with National Advertising. The other seven were built in the 1970s and were akeady in place when the City annexed the land upon which they were built. Z The Ordinance as proposed would allow for removal of billboazds that affect City viewsheds as part of Relocation Agreements associated with the City's Billboazd Ordinance Update. V1 _=a�,�� _ •., � ' 3 ' � Ange(es"IVafionat F-'brest - :�:i►�„� ; ,�� '� � � �� ' � : � � �G�laremont� �..�, Q �, �� '�Glendor T , � ��"`�, x -t�Rancho� , �ry ' [ � t s: J ��,Uplandj �". Cu ac monga,- � .� -... , � t i ��- � � � `� � ; �^ � iSan D�mas ; , �"^ --� k /1� . � # � � ��'�t �m 3 � � Y j` j 1 i �y'� CO✓�/18I M" � } ��g�` i 3 � �✓�� # , " � d z � � � �...� � �� ls�� r'h�� " -,,t z- > ��., �r.. ,,.�� _ � � � '�; a � �� , .�, � , � ��i� Montclair � d r 3 � ; M° £ L , '�`� � t � f t —� .�? :.` � � � , i �y. Pomona�,�t ; � ��! a � f `�'' � x �; _�� ,��„�� rOntano; ( � f ' � F � �.� �. � � � ' ��, � � � ' fi � ��r � � � � � � � a �'- �f � '�� ..�..� "Y,f �,�� , , +Welnut� �; t � � �.��. t ; �� L ., 'f' �� _� � - -�. �, ` ;� '�,' }� :`� �,✓ , J 4 s y �� '( � $�* �� ..�, ��k.. �J -��CI�t � ) ( �CMI/10� .nm, � � s � :F ;�i .. `"€. �, < R ti � + r .. �, x r " h ; 1 � � � � i v_ — �^Z s � � �: � � " �r �� , � � -�,� � � � � -� _ � Project 6ita � �� t E,.;�� „ �� 3 .� � �,� ' �1 . , ��+'� �� ,, :. "t '` � � �.-'a `' �� I °�� ,�t.' a ,.$ry . . � r .:m 3 `^� � �:� �� .,� � � !I �� t;- a� .:1, �,, §� �1 � € .'�"`"�a � e Los�g�les�Gounty, � ,� __ F �ChmoH�lls „ �i � ( �� ,;, ��ti �OrarigelCounty �t`P�� `5� �d �� .�'�� j ' � � � ��_ s� �d # j t ri� � � � J �, #" g .�: , �� o� ', � P�adoTFzldod�� y� .- �Noi'co� �''a --k � :o- 3 -' �. ��..;�- � _: � � �_, I , ' � � . �d� tf"ontrol B'as�n"� , --r� - tq ?�N:sorvvalk� �,,' � ,.,w � ' �,��"��'`�o�a, � � ,�. ,'� . X ., � �. • � _� p � � � � �o � � � -.} ,,.� � f � {� � ,, � , r��l . i� ��'�'`� tv � '��`�"�<.'�`� r r� �9�c��c�7 �� :�Y.,., ��e� t�``�^` , � + 6 s ,_ � ` r-� , ,.r q� ��{�� _.�� t ��3'� " � k,��Fullertony� '�` ,-�� , .Yorba�L�nda{ ,.yr��; �` ��f . � � J �� : . 7 � � t S � j �� +' 1��'t�, }.. v:�'� ��' i . � } `� t4�'�` "�i�}: { r�, ji t��5"�! ,�yr..�...a �R 2' T'+�..g 1 �'., }{ yqq5...`rM`■� '' ,.,pp) j1 {�+� f �€ i�' ��; Ci� � I S �'. � �r„ �.� 1` �"r� ! � �^ i�4 � ��,rr ; � %+. -h\1 7 � �� ,( �.�� ,�.�..� 1 4 ( �( � p ', A' V «-.} 3 � �.� # �. .S t� } � �._.. �.��.. ;;, �, �, {�1 � '��l �'�,) �f' �3.� 4 j �� C�'�'na t, � } ( t- � � 1 .w d�. � �� ._ ��. f _ 6 � � � r �w.--� < s ♦ � � � . � �� 1 ; � � � �i � ! 'C � �� L.... Anaheun,�� ,�rv�) }"�' � ' , �� t� �.,�� f �,.;� ;` � �� m�� ` � � � � �� > r �, '� `�r�,. � s. � . � , � � -� ,;� _ � � � a t � t \ L ' q �.�. .. 3�� i � yv 9.. � � ��.�.� 1 ? � , .��v . J,;r�� .�._ # # ,�,� 1 � _� ; E � -��.s � �- � r r ' yti� �' �'�s* (� 1 � r = .._�. � t r f. � ;� � ,W.� Orange �; 7� �� '� f;''" �' � ��d�" d s �s' _. "�:- -#y� -�}v�'` � .. +y ;t. , �`�o }�� ./ , � ..: .t 3 ��G �S -� t— . .� � t �� '�4: .�`+t, �� "�p��'3r„ `xe'�' ��' �,. -� � � �__.Garde .I_W. i� � `� . �• ��,-_-..�-� � � IIvGl�OVB t� � �, � � u�� Sant¢ago �y �'� ��'� � ' . t � � ��' �? �' [�CSeYVOIY � r�'�`"'�' '� � ,,��¢�� ,�Seal�Beach ._� �_ �� a�_ � �..a_. � � � �,,�� ? '� Cleve�'n�� z` �� _ > ��°,�� ;.�_9 � ...j .;.��.w� ..�.�;:�-.�(�� i,Sa t Ana ��'.,'h, r �`�,;. �� Farest�� , �I�' J,.�� ..��_�_mj._.�._` .._ �_:w� �._�(� � : t�� ", �? , f✓ >'/f L,�,��1 ' �'M Nat�onal,�� P � p� �� '� � � � � � � �iFountam'-�. w�� g w*,�,�,��i,Y' , � � �� r s �,g� � �� t .y� i'� �.�' 3�.._�, : ��rVellByi� �` � g � �� . � r' �,t'� ' �-'� �� , Hunfmgton i � r �i� � . g�� `�� ' � � .. �-�BBaCh 4 I ''�� ""'t�.. I' f��..°,. . „��^`q,.� .,`�,,,�� `�`�S r��,� �, �g � "� ; � � S"-.j ��.,..�..�� .� t_' +C" �� ^�y,��✓"' �/�:�f�'"� �`b-. � � � �a� ��k�� r,: J_�� p � .�� '� { ��s,�b_i7y �..� � �� d�,� � �a � � � Costa A�lesa,��'ti.�. r l.� �.s � ��.� � � �� , ��;i��° � '` ,° �t',�� . � .,,'. �� /N •' ^� .� i �,{, g .y � � , f �� ... 117E�� 1 `' .� . �� "'� �� f � �. '"1 £ �f � ,F,'`� r,, . � ,�,� ` F" �. � �'.=E '-- � ' ;_ j �,rtr,' w�._.�.� "'j�; � ��-� ��'`�,�.�, �Lake,�Forest Y� � �r � �}��: � � � `� t' `^ ��` ` � � ":��.� „� <�,�°" ,:�'�,f�'"w,t ��,�„� , �. > `� .�,� ;, `< x �� r � , �C' � ��} � �-.� --.. "�,,' t, �($ .d �"� � ': .��,�,�,"�s/ `<,t'` _`'s � ``' �f `�,t'"1, �� , � f.f 1 .. ��w.�a; :� �s ��Newport�Beach�,� g, � �.. �,r�.� ;f d i' � 3�'. P � i r.�,�, ' " . P a c i f`i c D c e u ri,. �'' " -: �'7 1 :�r,� '(�i La una k��a�� .✓"f �'',��, ' � � ,e ✓".� �� g - a., 'na H�lls�j � i �� r �Woocis� `g � ,�` x , £f f ,. � �� . � � � f`��,r � �; � �� , ,' • ." �• ,�a ,, '�.. . �r- ... . . r� - . • . .. ., �• � r � , , �� , � t� r � r�. Legend °� � (( E � 9 '1 "C.,. q �f F n .. ,,�� t� +�O Retained Billboard Locations ' - ',W'n�f • - _ _ � _ ��Laguna N�guel =� . ° ° „ =�� --._ ,. �� .; _., - � �� r'� U ✓ a; � _ M- - e �� .,. e a �� #�: � �r . _ . Source:Census 2000 Data,The Ca51L F1R51"CARBON e 5 2.5 0 5 Figure 1 - �OLUTIl�JN�"" �� _ Miles Regional Location Map 04040014•08/2018� 1_regional.mxd _ CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION �a d ..� + :��.�z�,,.Y�`�fi`��. g� "`'�:e... �.%�A''sF''c�is'!' ^ Ar�,rg� "+�r��aT�:`� ' ° .- *�''°� ta'' '"fY. 3 ��, ta�`n � ,� �I y � R.; ' :.v� '�"�*'�' �tre� '°8� �, - .� e� ^ .u. �� ` �A�n�a�elm,� "- �;+ � � � r , }^ .n0 � E "" i � . SQ '� }�_ � � %.r 1� ��'� ,��`��f�"'�''�� 1 vF7' i��».-.-`' . ��Xt d��M'"7,p�. w 3 ` ''" sS+�,� d• . �� k ;��„��t ;��t a, '"t�.� �_ a ,� S �y �p' *��;.£�,�`a t^� _�?r '�°�.-....+ r�, z. 5 ,. �, .. �� :, � , . � �� . '." .m�i i�a r �,a �t�ra,��,'� � � �t �{, �� ,� ss "� y� � ,�, � r, ....a.' � w v� � � ��, k x �4�°.;�' .� �,�� pA'p` j f 4�� '��a;:l: � � `� �"� ��*� � `� ��4:''�" � $� � � �V , i ; � � �-� �h � �, , .y ; { . r k _T°`�'."q 3w �� 5�`i ��y"�� '��,� �z� � � x �' �� ;o . � • ,,: �� "� � �""� C; ��v. .*, gC� �� ' ° m �A�' ma� 74�«� �� m..� �t`h .�ty�, ^�`%^%'- ' � � � s ' � af � : �.°�} `.�y,��.; �...' � e P � '(�,. �,�� ty ..c^v . �'' �.�. q ;,�,�In��m�� x:a1fT��C�,�w°:.j�rt�c�` � �^�.�, t.., "'�� ,�'tY�y�`�.�r:,'F k�'" *�,,� �" �, , �" w p•f.f v� y :�*'p+� �''A c`y� ��s�� ,�"�` �S ��';�. � �m/�� 4�� c� � ��! "�� £ ina ..i� 4 dC(„ty�o�fQrjn�e� �,y��y" s.V'l�Par � �*J- l` k ' a /�', �� 2r�„ T �„. �J' Y�iai� ; � N ^� � t �3� �.� ,/�' . � r; ,�1 :�� s�� ra �� i� .^�" �`�"�� .y!� A�� 'r��ti 'r� 'y y� � +s x�,t�..n.� i 9 v,��'� �"fi "`��' w,� ��:�.�� _ _,� . $ �� l„�°A '_ °�' � �{��q��"�, �S K�iei� '�,E�!`,�y:. x �� wm��*. > � �` , � �„�i `� �:� y �*' ,{° '�. �;:��1.'�+' ��1'm 1j�� '°':a"Pr - �'- �.t��,�` . �3 `�� i� •�'� :� � zt�J i�..' ij �4... ��`,.{'�.., .;t^ ,�a.�P�,'!I� i�„ � ,��... �,�?��µ "'+'ar ..Y �` rr ,^.' v� �.:,� �..i}.L� '�' d �� y^ � ��R• ^^�p�4��- J � �o- � �,- f a� .. � . � , � '� . , � � ,a � , w , ., �. C II �qav � �5 �b }� "� .�'°.��iS�� Q .t.i'��:.. � �`: ��^W�}` �,�.7�y �'�� ,� 'a` ,pt y�� 'i:�� '..:k,'xfil`t _�� f / �y ��.+� r �'� a� x -� r ; � r �4 A , �i. f`�� s � :��r ��".e`�3,y��.f �� 1�T�,. y t •" � $'�, �� . '�N��'�� r�: y��s ooa a��+' �e.,y, �s.� X '��w i o� i .�,: y. �'" . 7� ' '�i+,K s�� . x+ . � . ,. _ a r� 1 �j� t,+ `�c �y�* •'w`.(�,�. ,� �' f "S ^�� V rhyQ� 1 .p�,y£3 �� bw,�-�. p K " y � +'�� b % ' "� �/.�• . '� 3 �ChP nAeS�� ."a� $ 'i s?�'�' Bu'�. ��E?'��rY ..s�.��, �+1'F'� hYl^, � ��f�i(+��x#��._ .3 Ch p :3ip i �. ♦ � r ��V.' c*��.}�.�}�.�$ ,f� � � �d Sy.� � 4�� 1F�i „�.� ��° ., ��"T'l� � k�t. 4�l�-.°� �� •'M` '", w. �� ,I ..� 31� rl•��•�]�% rLa V�F �.rT.-'i Yfap�a��tnX � ;( +��ra*'"R' � ��,� �� "a .��+` -, � 3�� Lku�'�'�ta'.'��"�"� � hj'�r.,`.0 ��" '" �. •�.� ,� .t . i ` :1 � � � N ��,; �,�, CARPOOLS ONLY ��" . � 40?L SAxqhS � � : F �°j e.6KG'� � �.. � � �� H � q �iv P��' ��' '...��"�`�a�'�C�o��i � C'.� �: � t �H �� E ' i."� z"��,�t%�'`�y��i""�.�a�t-�.,."�'�� ,: d��w��r�'',�.3�� .,"�"�!�,�`"y�:° �'�'�� a��^'��^i� . v, .. �,�e��,�� i .. a� g�g �� `�i�� "'" a '��'�w ��i xr� .':� � T��Y��" r�� .��y/ � . � �' r 4 j�� .��v� ��, 8 ��/'2 s ' �i�� a��rk��r�d �'f� �Z/x�"�v '� x�� su�� " b��'✓y a'� � ,�x � �� m �+' ?T� "��Z�'„� � .'��'/y y� � �� rl -. �� ' � �i�,y�$�' " �'�� s"��'�� `�� H�/ . �' ��xs ��° r"��i`�� " r�x�''�� w ��^' ° r ; ;r � �� m "i � "� � � d�s ;.r� ta �a3^�'�' �z s �. r�a' s"€ � s�'�� ' �� z�✓vc� ,� ��a�z� �w � �� a�y r � w�x� �ge �,a '2 �,�r � �� a �� . ;r x�r , w .� � �, �r,��ff,� �, 2�a� g n�:�,t�� . s,s a r�� , ."� u r,�,�a'.� sa. �.'''1 �, '� ,�.,',.'. d �,�x„� � �� ,P✓�w�� e��'k�" �, %;A r� ��s �°� ��; �' 4� #.Y�� ,�'�,�1,�.►•a "�' �:.' fi��{;, � �� +� � �, � �, .� . — .:� '�" ....... _ , �„r`r- � ,� �`� ° �� ,. 6 � ,a '� "i �� . . ;'� .�� rt, � < � ` _ s;r . r.: b+rt Retained Billboard Location 1—West of SR 55,100 feet south of East Katella Avenue facing North °C� �„ a��'d�� rr�` ,r��y3,✓m ��y� ��,< v�� ;�%�i��/�/�r�f��f^' �i'�✓�` .`� a� ,f"` r��i;�� ,�&Y 4 � �k �Ayqb ly�'5�C�y� , J "" '.��.;,p` �W � �i� ° � m.,� , �1ai i ��r�%"��m�hy'��'` � ' ' �'.� � �ys � �� n� � � i'�u�y'�� `��"i�`` ��z� v��°� � � c�s�a�a �� d& � �a�� ,�> �,��1 ,�i � � a �� °� � '6�' '��%��"rtir ��- ,� �� Y�� 5� � s �iqs��1r��r�� 3� r ��gf �� '��a�� a��y��`��y�� e a c ��✓x�x�" v 9� ns'�� a� s� -�s � �� '�� .�"d � � � �w��,� �, �. ��F'9�� a;f,�,�9�r� a�i"c��.a�� s��r",�u.��if�,Ni ��'g�� '" � �� ,.,. � � ,� ��l y%��S x � ;&b � k� e�i�%��"� „ �r��'��s��'y ...""�ry�8''?� f� '�r,��f��r�$ ��d r �<�^�'��sa� 4�,. �� r " ��2v'.�" e°✓�� ff ✓ ��w.'��n�'ri? b r�`",✓�^ �� '�,� � . � , �� ;'� �a� r �� ,b�� ;' �� sr �� , �� f k � � �y,a,��, � ti„� �� r � 'y �� e �� , �� r �; s � r� � Q � ,,�,�,��y� � 9 z ;vl"„ ,��^`�'" � f x i 9 u�k �'f�'" m ,�' ��i 4 �� 1�he"'.i�'' �,�� , s� �d 9 y Y � �y� 6r� �y 6 3�a: �4 � ��2 p��1 �y�v "p �,„ ��A��'�� -�"�� ''"� " y� r�,�;�,/�d'$b ��„ ^�,„r� � w ,� �% � v"` ��,��yty�� ' �;"��"� W� ' �� z�? $ : '��"�� "�;�d��^`'�� "F�jZ�� rc„ ., ��Tx ��r�1 : �,">� „� � a. �3�/��r�i'�,> �e a �'` K : � �,�`�'� � �"`�!��'" '''96, ,,;�: 3','�w�a�.,. �w;.��Pa�. �c��: �,:� � Y�� o�a+"� +�a. �. �..� t � �.""= t � �` "� ��;„�",�.a � �. ,��'�• ""�' '�`; � ..�ru �'C r �`'� � i : : r � �. � a � S � ,� ^�, '�� `ra,..w,„.,�.�5.<... "w �,..�w. ; y. -,!'�.� �� ^' t�" �',1 � � ' � C r '� ��sr��.�t 4�,�'�^;� �'.� �'�'��f �l�r�i�a�a7 � �� +..��^�` . , w"---,.z�....,,�„� ; . � ,,,.��'�i�,� r'�i�#`�a��$ �i d r y ,�S ^-r"�.^a-;:: � '�� j� �� '�k� �� , � 3`� �F„�� ,� q� w ,z: * � ,� . .,�< e�a.,�� ,a �«, � e �� ? . � Retained Billboard Location 1—West of SR 55,100 feet south of East Katella Avenue facing South Figure 3a FIRSTCARBON Retained Billboard Location 1 —West of SR 55, SOLUTIONSTM 100 feet south of East Katella Avenue 04040014•09/2018�3a_site_photos.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION , THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK - �zv� ��`e � � t�5 � ��. ��H�� 1 1�yJ0 1 A `�a` � , � � �� tiy " �� ;;q�t��,�� a � a��a�' i�e�� Y�m'"`1i �r��' . ;�.�, �r S�� r ' " �� h��t� r y�� C � "��r �� a �r� � �� r ��!� �r �; � �. . , r 'ti „�`' �< y'� �� ' r; � ��, �„, 9 "� � �� i �q °f'x ''�Y � r.f; ,�-e wa�. � j � ;Y:,;'�1� ,lM� -�` . .... e . - J r.: — .�.�j »�.g.�^,y3. ��* � � , p' ��', �,�s�^ . �" .v;r � ��W�� ✓�. Retained Billboard Location 2—West of SR 55,1,900 feet north of Meats Avenue facing North s � � , � ^� � ��/%�y�'��i�� '�� s��`ti ��`��y�r�� G��r��i� � r�z � N ��r`��^�i'�n �F6 � �"�'i i✓F i � y�'�i�� r��z,� .+��' "�f�zr ��^ r��i�� Cti Y �i�%w�'#� } ,:sr �"l�' o ' '" � �� r:?r � �oa yA a�i ✓� �Sr✓F f��r� t"' ;� , G�z�q� iy /'i� �s a��a� z,a�p � ��"!k j' /dr � � � � ,��" tsoy,%�� ;r�xf H � � u �fri� < � � �,t��, r. ; E�4� �H: 2,. _, . • � o� " s I:;, �;,.�� i �. Retained Billboard Location 2—West of SR 55,1,900 feet north of Meats Avenue facing South - Figure 3b FIRSTCARBON Retained Billboard Location 2 —West of SR 55, SOLUTIONS7M11 1,900 feet north of Meats Avenue 04040014•09/2018�3b site_photos.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK � , �. : � „ � � : � ; �� , � �, �� . d ��°"� �� .? �,�°„ � %� p � � rn ��"��4��y�a��,�"�,1�� "� i� l a -�F 4� l� � „. y�,„ " � : �s��'�' '� "�" �r�w�'�"fr� y,��$y,�"r� �� y�', n� � �"��i°�� '��t' £� "`��"�"Y" ��v�" �%��r�'w�°�'y � .� ��',�u��.-�,��'•t��'��, �'��a�, ��" � ��i"'5��`�� x,�a��e� �'„� ,�,. v y.� ,y , � � ;�E ��,�a/f �,�' �k'�� ''�� '��"`$$' �� .�" ��. � ��h�. ��^..�� a � ,� ��,� r �',� y ... �� , ,. ��i �+ s� 'ti 9� ?�;� ' ,�� ''�„ ,�„ t ..�' �' � 5,�'�' "'�'" °��A�`�3�s � �'�,' ` �y '�°% �,�a�9�2' �' 6 n �. � � � �� q '�s � �� . �, �` , �. f � _ »»...�.,n. '"$:,C"" � �Y; -��, t . e ;,. '^��`,^i tAi:.'t:t I� _ � .. . �4. . . �., �. �.. . .- l ,n.�"'_" .` R.' _r..",...w+� . 4 �, . ,�,..«r y., t. �,,y�'L#�"y..,.,��"y`"'S� �.—T" a . ., i * ^ M `G _-r, r. f6 .r�' i G: � �� y �'�� '� � ��.r�"'...�✓owr 4 ,:�.� H rv�u�X'"�'��'R°`w ` "t 2£ t �y ��': 'L.i' ✓� " d .�,t "+Y� {'��e d "�`"�m " L 'y' �^° y+�.F � , Y �� x :� 7 d $ : , � �.^ .. � & �. � .. S � �hp �.3 ` Y� `� - , �, a,' '�'`3 w✓' Y p"�,y"uJ`"A 4 ��aT : .. , '� 4� r �� . C` . 'E ,�,, g r �& t✓' . y g "` r� �„-' +.�a,�,,�,�,,,..za .c� ,,a..�M ,C, ,ti.r�� t „�..��-x"�'.>,i�.�_ �w n�x � �� } � `� , Y �„P� g �-`�. -�'a +� ..� �,.ct+:-s r �m�� .4 , f "' � e iv4+n E �'Y�„�.^. ��„� cz� �r ,,,e�d:"p =°�w�: w �' „Y-^+3r a°`�"' �..�r'" a-.t4.: .'+.,. `* .;^7, �7�✓.�s�3..+fa W ,^Y.' Retained Billboard Location 3—West of SR 57,250 feet south of West Chapman Avenue facing North ��. � � � „�„ � , , �� ' �e�� ,�� , �� n cx 7`�,g.�'��1 �: ��r5�'�i?� " ,A�-'A� i��"° � r fr � ,^��F/ � wif �w�� t�'��k�r � �� ,.,�� a�p��a� �"r��`��r�u �r��i��"�' "� "�H�>�"Y. M C N��i"�5�'��j�),r,&,�' yy��'`%� a�Y � e^Yr �� '"..�4 � °��V��"x a��y��a�, � ��,�� " �� ' �.i r� � �✓�aq '� r��m��%�� ''�'"c�z��&a ��y�s� �fY��Y� �,, i/ ��;�,:�� t � � # �F'ra`� " ��.`='.��s 7 �i� r,�' �r " � ��^r��„, 1 ,�,�r"��%f�r�.,� ��. ��,�a�"n� .��b �!� s '� �. � ��,� � � �.,�,�ae�ma " � r z,�/'d �� . i �,� r 4�5�r/� ; ,z� ,d�;��e��x� �. ` z" °ia�r� +e,s � ,��,� ,�� ,.,e � �:'��"`�". �,� .,..-,. , , „„ ... .....- ;, ""��r .. _ �,�c , a{Fz�� 5�"'"�..1��,� �'a� ��x x� � � �: �� i�1`' � �� . P �, ; �, i'��t+-',�^�-�... �,.� ,,,�:.�, �ak�`�'""�`' , �, �.`&'�""rv"x�.�.�" .„� "',�,�5��?�� I'�ra� r�.�ft s�;',�..,,'� t � ��o-^�"�.�.�,M� ��4^��*s,� � �`�^� �7�` �' w%�r`�"#1'��k � ^L "�t '�,,. � ��, r.:�,'°£ k�w.... .�r.,,�w�' �'�w�' � � � n.sE +�''w �� •: � � �. l y a ,�� r� � i� � �,'d��f�� y �� '�mc'�t R 'S}� � 3 �.�" t� �:.:au� �s�' !'fYU �i�itl�l,`�MY�sj .!, �sw`Fn��yt� �'�i,M,y,`a�� @� ,s��i�.*,t' ",�-' a, � „�itTM,9�� . �'�. ��y � w �� "�� e ti"�� t � �° �T. .xe�ti„i�� , �, �r�'�` Retained Billboard Location 3—West of SR 57,250 feet south of West Chapman Avenue facing South Figure 3c FIRSTCARBON Retained Billboard Location 3 —West of SR 57, SOLUTIONSTM 250 feet south of West Chapman Avenue 04040014•09/2018�3c_site_photos.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAIVK z � �� T�� ^� � A 5/�� b : b��x�`,� r �rBi� ' x;,r w�t� ��i� �`" ?� �%�� ,�f',s ft sy�x�9%a y"`za r�� r f"'�s�`, r ""�i'�s�✓� �,2�i�� .,, u� ��h�� P��d �p��f r��'� ��+,� �;"';�Z y. a� r��`✓��v'��"e �.�1y��"F�a'� �" d Frf � M �� a,,�'im� - � � A"� v 5 H M 9 Ziw ✓ ; xt �: �"""' ��` 2 / r �� ili. h x�a �a � �3�{nx"y �'��'� �ti i �" y��j� ��'� P'^ s �.� �� ry ��. !� ��1,�� /�� .� aL'�fi�a�„x � 2�H �' �� "�e � �� ' ",��i is'�a � ��%��°�^� / � � �� $a . : �l a ,w?g�'�✓f� r��rix��'H � r� �� yk��„��a'z� � ��aiv�' /� ey �� r r r�� t /ry�d� x�, ,, �/��^�I � 5 � ��✓ �� i� h 9 �z d%ks 9v s �� v �� - y YY�i:' �iz� 1 o N z F �� "��'%� 4 "�`'"<,'r � r��" z3��k� � �/�i aa �vF �P 1� �YZ� �F ��3 Py ,� �x „ � ; �iv�rti �.�i�� 4d � „ 3 ��g/�' � d� yy ,��'� ,�� ,� �✓� ��fi�x I r �� 4 °�� '. t'� � r�% ,�`�� l��y� � '' �`� 1r" �y � � �� ,g � a r �r � � � a�� 9 ��a . s i � � s a c s�'"r � d r y�: k y 92' o� r " � y �Y' � t� ,�� 'h�� `�� z ` z � " <#t �� ✓'��fi : r� � ��'�✓�r^�� sDi"��,�" � �.F�'l� �� 'k,�,n �'^ �'; � r ti�' a a 7 / h r �, �y y� f 2 4 s N/d 4 � `f� }�z'� .� rP � �° n ,, f. a' #'� � �„ �,s'��i � rf 4 a �, x � w tt ,"� c,,� c G 1fi �a �% P��n�� i�� .�A��' � g 9i��'y�� ;5� �� '�'��y�' �4� �nt�^�� ^f a S& 5''�k" �' s r` s 4 � � ✓�/��i 1 y rf� �r �. *�;. ,�"r`' � x �. �.�j��, 3 3d ro ��5� � n� -,�f�� '��7 s W� �A. �� eiF`� a �� v ; P y � - 9�D "ya ' r� R � w ��,�' � ,nr f�t '�� & �s /�y( ��y 1,/� W �$ '�' f'� �� ''�„ T 3�'/ k2'�,{y �''9 �" k � r rf'vl '` � . � ,r &'�.`-+' 3 , x � l b ��%^"P,,y.. � rrFm J &d f � � ,�� 4� y P ��.� 9 � .�1 �E a ' � � � �� 4'��j l �a "ba : - y r z�f� �4e+ �i� � � 'e° J � �� ' a �� s �"'�� ti i B �, k 7 � �� / �;,t Q " ,��" �'� i T � � '`r . 3 4�� y �� r ,au ,,:�`b. �v�� .,,Yf,;z = �� l.�u'�„,^,x1� e� ��2�� q,,,, .. a �,.;;,.. . '�� b�� 3� d �E:. / . txi�` � so � '� v r` �� f ��:�� a*:.,. sr: . r"�" ��•��„ � ,..n"'�. � A'tti v �u-� °' ` s�` W.� �. � ��+ , ��` �� .q`!�u#�,�y ce � 'I�,fi�+��i'� a i �.. r w�. � �, _ x v� ..'IM1WWiM"��'>. Retained Billboard Location 4—East of SR 57,100 feet south of the Santa Ana River facing North g E � ,.:, itti? � , �� (; Nltt }` � � �� t�au z s�� ' `� � , � � � � y �M�� r ., �. ;, � .; �; �/M � d , 'a #" W�wdrt � � + y a . 1 , 5 '�r t a �t a� -�` § '� � k � 6 ✓rc� 5 f� } d �.H � 7�F. „�r f."� � " �xl� .1 � ' j �p .. � �4 A ^ r. f � ,��7�n,� �,r"��„6 6CFi�� 9�. y;� , r ag v M1 '�ri � �2�i� `�y/ ��9 ��a . E `��s � # .'s� ��w y,�� c s 0 �� u �/d a" �rz- „ e�;:� .. "° ,. �g ro ,' � b 7 y, �i i:.h `� '� f f¢�� v ,➢ r �a; �, � / �, �' � 9h% aa , � 9 A: � F y F ,� ,.q"o y � y� C � ,�. 7 � � v 9� �a i a 1r� � � �„ �,'� y u � . i � S�y ": �, � � � �m 5' 9 +�" +,,- � ' � 'o. � 'r ,�?✓� ��; ��!«. y� � .. ,` „ � �. � , _ q,i + »r rt� �� .,,. �.. , . �..�° �x ,� 4 d 34 s+,:;, a^I �r'��3� �� . " � ..� , . �* z5 +�^4��" �� .vX {x�� ' �'c. ' 3 "��^"�e'u6-y^&�w'RM � ,..AS�`,i�� k�..�n'"3�..,i�4t�a; � l . S s� �'C'd"�v ' L F �,�. : -" r � '� : *;�g '�i ��a��"�' � � �` , '� r'�"�'� � "✓�' S� � a-`n` N a d` y�.,� �^ �„ v"^` s � �' � � a 'a� ��+� �yw � , ..ir�.� ,�'t.�fi��"'� e �"�a� fi s"v,, '�7n*� c � �� r � . �`'�r G�w,2°`�y"�'ye r �. '' a,�, '� "�� '� :.0 �' ' N +. d � �'�w �'^ re " c� � � v� "� ��s> � gf ��n �, . � s � � � � � -.-�,�s£reu�� '�'� � V r �� y� a � � y"zr *",r ,a �-� � t+°'�'` 'P' r - $ t;a .�„�y� � t �r� ,.r^ �,�e ' {k „ � ,,..°" ad ,� � z t.�� *�� t �,�`��° `E 4 "'`w�,qk w �.; a R^^�'.a� � a� �� ,f-� y�^'�� r t aY � i,�r"�`r , �a;�'�.� a y�+ �, . `��..�� dw. '*+� �a� .�� ;d�.�� r � � �q�"�'�".d ,��': e `�¢r w'� "'�ef'� �.s � � „��" `� '� ,r"��"",�'�',�� .��^�7��',�� . r tsd1��.`�"��u`�-€�"�x'� x�`, "� �� .�t`s�'��,y +�'r. �. � `'k "t'" �"' ,� �,�x ,�sv'Y�a.r'l ��,t�,r f� s a�x�' w n 7 :. 5�,�.a �'s�y ��, � � "'�fl x nt- E'c tu&t� �. ��,F,'C ✓�� z'�+�� ,� «�r N�„!��'^v 5'r �$��pe v r � a a �ws t� ��% x; `u� E�r r, ��z ��,�,.#a� x .�s �" ,� j �,k�: P �s � y,,�,� ,,y ✓ �� y a•` r�,�""�`'`'�, :F a` ,�"'� ��`� s a,,x' ,��'��'��+��"�'.� +t�i'.��?��;,�,i�� , ;: � n...r„ ,�»� v ? Retained Billboard Location 4—East of SR 57,100 feet south of the Santa Ana River facing South Figure 3d FIRS1'CAR60N Retained Billboard Location 4— East of SR 57, S�LUTI O N ST"' 100 feet south of the Santa Ana River 04040014•09/2018�3d_site_photos.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION � �� "� �� x � g -, . :,.; .'.. , e�e.^, >,.;-� fi �� h � � �� s� ��,�`��, �,,��r� 91, ��'� ,�z �� y ta l�' � �.: � ..' y ;�¢ �x �� ?yf'��'`��r�� . .�it`�� j ��a �"�%� f �� i',� �° �e r 9sa`� 4a�k�"%'��,F''�r�� t �,a a ra��% ^�v �i'�"y��y��r� �"z,l ',�� ``"� 4 � � �.9y�� '�� p�� '�;s� i �'��,y,Xi� J 3 $ � ✓�"` k�A�9 F � d✓h u�' � � 4 ""�' ,R '� 3�"l .� � �� .�,�,,'�'.,,�'�'�� r . �� Z r ��b �,z� F :z r� ��x��w��°„"�''�`,,„� �y��r/✓ „�°r.��.fi�j�ar �n"�'� r'�.��P✓� �r �„�u x �. ,,v� sF 1��' � � �'r ;� �'��}!J,yli� , ��y /3�q, f ��«r6r� � �k��c v�: �/��i <�„,,�:��f y��'/�� x �i�� l".✓�,�� u'P: '"� ��d � ,, K 4 €i �y �v r � r 4 r a��^�" �5 �a�� w`�"��f/i � ua',�� rN a h��2',:i'x �,��r' ��,'�zj� �3.�� '�'�'��f� �a"�'c��a` �"'(�F � �� a ��`?4 a�9yrr ,u'� ��;, �i�'"'s;�i ��x � a �.�tv . w �, q �.�� a'a�"��,�i z �rPr,.�'�v��';�""+"'�'Y Y�� c� � �?m�� a�`� ' a��"�� .. � '��„�L�F°.� ��fl�°d�'�� t ,5 A��, �i,�;. v a ,�j�,!l��w 't 'w�,'�9�/a� � 7 �/��;.;PMraa?.,y�,Sk �Mt�/ '� ,,r��i''�� i az"�"��ar��, '�i�� . ��"�f x�s'��k�,, �w'�,��,,yr b r� ^�,i '�'� ��r �� "�i��'" , �� 'v ��'��,,; ��3 5 „�° �'g.� - ��,''dy��,�`' .2 s �..�� y �r o ,�� # "7�y,` ^ ��d x ,�, 'k�, % r ��i��c� �:,, 5 w: ;��b" ` `;x i�fH�i;�4,`�'er � ��s"�V;� �a Y�4+�'�� M� KK k� J! ��;�%� �" � a,»,w..��,.,_. °;� r -.x '�a'• z�, r �"� ,,;r��+' �k ,.�p. y.],. z,.r�,,, ).j t ,.ry S �Sfi� q�"T�.. � ,*� � � .,f�p ..5y :A �"Mf�''� �� 'l"'6+�^ _ . �. A $ 'ru 'F Au( `� Yi�i � "��' �. � ' F a t n � � '� i � '� - �.,,'�`�� "».^�* �`�z"`,��"->�^ �;;,�, ��r .�. .�.�,�, � ?y y � . r��a e ». � b J '6� tl 't.� R,�m-`0 . 1. ,y✓ �� .� P $l�`$�� 'eyy5 ��'b , '• � � . •m,�"•'�j""�,,,,<...�.,.,yg��dy�'x3�'�+ ,.. t k ��9 y� w,m'��y,�, ,�,'_W�+' �, ' `� k. ' '�,a�"a 'A��6 vC . � "�'�rt'�N�l�°�j�,�a� 9� �� -x� x� ��« '.��-'^.�s'� x4F d'+,ak�,' x'�*x � r �.,,'+� y �;�.?�,�'`.a.'�m..�.�....�:::'��f�'�Mft�,�a.,� ��°�.""��'�ix yb.� ��. : , .s,5a ,.5m..`�.:;�;x. Retained Billboard Location 5—East of SR 57,220 feet east of the SR 57 North onramp facing North �� , h" � xz� L� �� y� �s�; �✓ x k p� ax � " � ��r �'a`�� ' �i� ,��'��r�m�% �y'4��s; �� ,� ��`� �'`� � �� ,v: ',,��'§�rx�. .� , i �`r " a.p, 7 a �� ec��a�,�y m�B y,,V�'`�'.. h� �. �� . ��x�b�,' a ?�t�ig��:. �F ` � ' .� �, �� , ��3� �� `. ��' �r�i� �� " � 'M r�'��4�� m`�'� �,�' ,��a� � �n � � ,�'"�� . �' �f�"�`�r �,� '�``��, y'�'�' � �v. � �S ��& '� S� � m� �; x�.� ��v4 � �„�,�� ,� .r � v '�� n �� r�z�� "� �,��'�� 'tiu r�`°`�'��r � o�;,�° '��xF t�� ,. s ��,�� ,� 3�" a H' ��`�w �"%' � ��„�,��f�t,��dr��'�,�,!�W��9 �� .�%�"r,�� a�_,1�x�.�i'�� r� � �� r ��,�q� �� t��° r �.�.,"q �� 7'*s. `� � ��k�� F�'�N��°/��''w,2''fi A .Y �+I P ��" h �d�:/ g� L�,�'�� / ��z'M"�� `Yrf�� Y�.. �::��;. i,%dZ�,a��. �� v s��jy�.�/'�,�^'�. ✓�� ,� ��,� �� ,�,rw.; �%'�'�"y f�F � �c�� /� ��y�,�"'fl � �� y�� ro#c � v r'�r. ��^` ��E a"�Fvw�,�r�"f �l �� ` � s�'�y�. �� r�rx��r� � ��,��£ s^� y� �b �r'� %;�,�h�^r;,� y��%'�;5s? �a"�**�' ��( �� f5�i ro✓'�x`6�y � va✓�`��£'b� ��y�5�^�� .� �^Sr f��'n�", :w �i �y��i0� �„�t ,'rWa�ry3n . ��,�4� �N A�j ! -.: �,�H i o r�.?�� t��.� &t �! �� '� ��'�� : � r„� �i�9 ��t`/�%y,� w^��d s i Yt :,+ j a "s r,� x �"�v�'a �r ! ��r�.�9. r n�� r � �brs�� ' �"9fi� �'�w � �ri;`. ,��f �� ,a,� z� r�� 3 z�.�b ,��y g,y �"�a��,�� ,,��/�.ii��' f t ��'�,�d��y �.� �.��vry�'.� $�✓�rc�%✓��y� " �qy�y 4 a �,�g � : ��,� i �;F��/,'�� . t ��r��u�z F6 ��k��%�nwY� � '�.�°��r,�t ��'��v v . v��Fs"'� 5a r " d� y,�' �r �kr e t�v +�i'g �'� ��o � �e ti :y �z u ,�6FP��i a. ��` t ,�e „ �a�yem,�r�� rr✓a� - r�m ��1 . K ^` , 3 : .r,�� 5�' �° r � d9 ,�'��y : f i7'�a� $ s �F F'%�d�� "'lyd 7H r �"�,� y��y " `y .� �'' �a r �? ar��,� �� '�i"� �e� � � �i� %�� '�aP/��n'b �� ,/a .q �` p� :, z � a �h � , �� t�. $�� x �� P✓ '" � w��"�,�z.�i""f� ��f�%>�v F`. �'� � �R� � �`��°b �`��j y,i �� r�� 'K �Y v�r r y P s�ry n z. c' . � � � �/�m ,d� 3 u 'E° ',�F � � '/" �'r"�6 `� f�/F ✓a i d✓ �.c ,1�� ;,�i�yu i� a�``K ,y�,��q��. �.y��e� a :2r z��.� �' � -.„�k��,�£v� �x�a y�"�� w ryr��'�� " �� ..�,�,�� v''. �� 9"� x r�"�i '�� x g `�r ' �3�� / g�%' t`� : a � � � i � � �� i 6""" �.'�y '� �'i"' /� ,✓" �" Y�t,�v -° � ��`;"a t'��iA � +� ¢ l%^ "� � �G � ��,�^.a .. '�� ,��.,�v,e �%� ✓��",F�i� �' � �^�n� ��„��r'�" s' A* � lz ��w%"�ty+�p'- �"�y �c � � �� " �, ��" a � � .�%� ,�� . �, vp�B a � r'�' � aa ��v u r: ��s�,��,..�. � r"� s r ci�% x� ��a �a �� s - ��" �` r��q,�✓r� r,' �,�, � � k .�Y� P�dms�. i`��'" . `,'��" i y�fi b � , �•./� hl�� 4 ^��t�,';,k s 5H$r '��. �r r� �' �,�� J F . � a+ �' �� f 5 �„N��". a,.� a'a' �,,,;�d�'�^�d + �`/k �l�`� � � � ".�m� ��" ��x d n d� �°��r* �y � . �,v �� <aF��„.: �;„ �� 9'� "" k;�;;�...�,-,�� ;- Retained Billboard Location 5—East of SR 57,220 feet east of the SR 57 North onramp facing South Figure 3e FIRSTCARBON Retained Billboard Location 5 — East of SR 57, SOLUTIQNSTM 220 feet east of the SR 57 North onramp 04040014•09/2018�3e_site�hotos.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 81LLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Detailed below is information regarding existing billboard/project site characteristics and surrounding land uses: • Billboard 1: An existing double-sided billboard is located on the west side of SR-55, 100 feet south of East Katella Avenue (at 1936 East Katella Avenue; Assessor's Parcel Number [APN] 372-532-07). This billboard is located on property developed with a restaurant (Shiki). This site is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, a hotel to the west, light industrial to the south, and SR-55 to the east. • Sillboard 2: An existing double-sided billboard is located on the west side of SR-55, 1,900 feet north of Meats Avenue (APN 372-642-33). The billboard is located on an otherwise vacant, triangularly-shaped property immediately east of property developed with a single-story Best Buy Electronics store. This site, located along a freeway, is surrounded by commercial uses to the west, multi-family housing to the north, SR-55 to the east, and a mobile home park to the south. • Billboard 3: An existing double-sided billboard is located on the west side of SR-57, 250 feet south of West Chapman Avenue (APN 232-032-01). This billboard is located on a property developed with a single-story fast food restaurant (Burger King). This site is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, offices to the south, SR-57 to the east, and South Anita Drive to the west. • Billboard 4: An existing double-sided billboard is located on the east side of SR-57, 100 feet south of the Santa Ana River (APNs 386-381-04 and 386-381-OS). This billboard is located on a property developed with a single-story building currently being used as a pickup location for a furniture showroom and shipping company. This site is surrounded by the Santa Ana River to the west, SR-57 further to the west, office buildings to the north and south, and light industrial uses to the east. � Billboard 5: An existing double-sided billboard is located on the east side of West Orangewood Avenue, 220 feet east of the SR-57 North onramp (APN 386-401-14). This billboard is located on a property developed with single-story office buildings. This site is surrounded by offices buildings to the north, south, and east, and SR-57 to the west. Billboarei Sites Identified for Removal � The Billboard Ordinance Update, as proposed, requires the permanent removal of a minimum of five static billboard faces for every two billboard facings proposed for conversion to an electronic format. The location of billboards proposed for removal will be determined in conjunction with each application for a proposed billboard relocation/conversion. In general, existing billboards are surrounded by major arterial roadways, commercial, residential, light industrial, and rail lines. Figures 4a and 4b show the typical daytime views of existing static billboards that could be reinoved. , xxi PROIF,CT DFSCIZTPTION Project Background Outfront Media, owner of several billboards throughout the City of Orange, proposed the conversion of an existing traditional billboard located at 1936 East Katella Avenue to a digital light-emitting diode (LED) billboard and the removal of a total of five billboard faces. Two faces for removal are located at 140 North Prospect Street; one face is located at North Orange Olive Road, 250 feet south of Lincoln Avenue; and two faces are located at 2875 North Orange Olive Road. The billboard at 2875 North Orange Olive Road is located on unincorporated (County)lands that could affect viewsheds within the City. The City of Orange Billboard Ordinance, Municipal Code Title 5—Chapter 5.62, Signs and Billboards, does not address new billboard construction or the conversion of existing billboards to a digital format for those billboards seeking to advertise a message not directly related to the property the billboard is located on. Furthermore, the Orange Municipal Code does not have provisions elsewhere that specifically addresses billboards. Thus, the City has decided to update its Billboard Ordinance, as described in more detail in the following section. Billboard Ordinance U�date The City is proposing an update to the Billboard Ordinance with the proposed text included as Appendix A. The updated Billboard Ordinance would completely repeal and delete Chapter 5.62 (Signs and Billboards). Specifically, the update would amend Title 17, Chapter 17.36 (Sign Regulations) of the 1Vlunicipal Code, which would still prohibit the construction of new billboards, but would allow retention of existing billboards and the conversion of the five billboards located within the Freeway Corridor where conversion would "...include the removal of a display and construction of a new display to substitute for the display removed, as defined in California Business and Professional Code Section 5412."3 The updated Billboard Ordinance would include a provision for a Relocation Agreement that would allow a billboard company to convert an existing traditional billboard to digital in exchange for removing another. As such, conversion of any of the five billboards specified in Table 1 would be contingent on the removal of existing billboard faces. The conversion would be subject to the.discretionary approval of a Minor Site Plan Review. Additionally, Section 17.36.180(D)(2) would stipulate that electronic billboards may only be located within the Freeway Corridor (as described above in Retained Billboard Locations) and away from any residentially zoned properiy. The electronic billboards would be subject to additional stipulations including height, size of sign face, images displayed, and maximum intensity of light as defined in Section 17.36.180, Billboards, as described in more detail below: • An electronic billboard may only be located within the Freeway Corridor; 3 City of Orange. 2018. Ordinance No.O1-18. [Note at the time of writing of this IS/MND,the text within this ordinance has not yet been adopted.] XXll • Each sign face of an electronic billboard shall be oriented primarily for viewing from the Freeway Corridor and away from any residentially zoned property; • No electronic billboaxd shall be located on or within 300 feet of any single family residentially zoned property, as measured from the base of the structural support column of the electronic billboard to the nearest property line; • No electronic billboard shall be located within 500 feet of any other billboard located on the same side of the freeway, or within 1,000 feet of any other electronic billboard or on- premises electronic sign located on the same side of the freeway; • The pernutted height of an electronic billboard shall be determined through the Minor Site Plan Review process and shall be limited to the maximum height necessary to ensure adequate visibility of the display from the Freeway Corridor; however, in no event shall an electronic billboard exceed 60 feet in height, as measured from finished grade to the top of the billboard structure, or in the case of the conversion of an existing billboard, the height of the existing billboard,whichever is greater; • The area of each electronic billboard sign face, including framing and trim, shall not exceed 680 square feet; • Electronic billboard displays shall contain still or static messages or images only, and no part of the sign structure or image being displayed may move or present the appearance or optical illusion of movement,-or include flashing, blinking, or traveling lighting, the varying of light intensity, or any other means of not providing constant illumination. Each static message or image shall be displayed for a minimum of 8 consecutive seconds before changing, and the transition or blank screen time between one display message and the next shall not exceed 1 second; • The m�imum intensity of light output produced by an electronic billboard display shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles above the ambient light level at any time, as measured using a foot- candle meter at a distance of 250 feet, and shall otherwise comply with Section 5403(g) of the Outdoor Advertising Act, and Section 21466.5 of the California Vehicle Code; • Electronic billboard owners and/or operators shall make space available for the display of emergency messaging in accordance with local,regional, and/or State protocols. Relocation A�,reement of Billboard Location 1-1936 Katella Avenue Site In November 2017, the City and Outfront Media entered into a tentative Relocation Agreement for the relocation and consolidation of signs that would result in the removal of five sign faces and the upgrade of the existing billboard at 1936 Katella Avenue to LED. This Relocation Agreement did not commit the City to approving the project or to any course of action, and was wholly contingent on the City's later adoption of the Billboard Ordinance Update. If the ordinance amendments are adopted, this Relocation Agreement would become effective and Outfront would be entitled to apply for remaining approvals to remove various signs and xxiii construct a new sign at the Katella Avenue site, including any necessary building permits, electrical pernuts, demolition permits, and Minor Site Plan Review. �otential U�grades to LED Potential upgrades to LED would occur as part of implementation of the Billboard Ordinance Update. All of the five billboard locations identified in Table 1, above, could be upgraded to an electronic billboard with two LED display faces. The billboards could be two sided or V-shaped with north- and south-facing LED displays that are anticipated to continue to be visible to vehicles traveling in both directions on adjacent freeways. The displays on the billboard would be in the same orientation as they are now,which is a flag design structure mounted on a support column. The pole heights of the existing billboards would not change as part of a conversion to LED displays; however, the smaller "face" of an LED display would result in a slightly reduced billboard height overall. As stated in the proposed text "except as otherwise provided in subsection F, the height of the top of the sign face shall not exceed 60 feet, as measured from finished grade," where subsection F provides that, in the case of conversion, the height of the billboard must be 60 feet or the height of the existing billboard, whichever is greater. The billboard frames would be smaller than they are currently, and the advertising surface area of each billboard face would also be reduced. Table 2 shows the existing static billboard dimensions and the allowed LED billboard dimensions. The billboards would continue to be equipped with upper and lower catwalks that would continue to be accessed via an existing access ladder that is attached to the catwalk deck. Table 2: Billboard Dimensions # , .� � , , � , , `� �, � £ � � � � �� f Adverhsing�° ' � ��r � "�� s �� , E r � �SUCf8C0 "` +�' Billboard ` Billboard � ��Aiea Per � � ,. � �� St�ucture� Frame � �Number�of� �Face � Billboard � `�� `Billboard I�ocahon� , , Hetght(feet)� (feet) �Faces;�- ' ;(si�nare feet),' 1 West side of SR-55, 100 feet south Static 95 20 x 60 2 1,200 of East Katella Avenue LED 90 14 x 48 2 672 2 West side of SR-55, 1,900 feet north Static 70 20 x 60 2 1,200 of Meats Avenue LED 65 14 x 48 2 672 3 West side of SR-57,250 feet south Static 55 20 x 60 2 1,200 of West Chapman Avenue LED 50 14 x 48 2 672 4 East side of SR-57, 100 feet south of Static 55 20 x 60 2 1,200 the Santa Ana River LED 50 14 x 48 2 672 5 East side of SR-57,220 feet east of Static 70 20 x 60 2 1,200 the SR-57 North onramp LED 65 14 x 48 2 672 �iv � �� '�z'a' z � �Q ,,w�� -.�i u ��i��"��1�� i?' � � � '1 � '�7 u , a � � � � ,-.�.'�r,w._,U r,�„ � "`�� '� y�� i ' ,1�s !I G,�.�"""":�`..:'�rc:f. N '��sr x +�^'F��S� �!" `�; 1 �'j� 0 �`�f��"s�Y� :�H�"� y�a ° 2s i �� ; �c+ ��^� �:r;`=� � ._..._ .a�t � ., . ..+.�. ... � i. "\._.e �1 140 North Prospect Street facing North �, � y�y� � �� //��p,5 y '� �r�y �y��k�,�n a y��,z��q � ��"1 �'� i `�i t��✓�� z � A a,��y��%��'� ��"�a� , � � d ��r��" ��' y N r� �//l�� .� �"%�� $ 6 7i kyh'�'��'Y� �"�H�� p�� y�� 1 a' Gan �p' � "�r��3 � �'�aei�9 ��✓`?��>� �2` �f �� ,," ry,�,,�9��'�� ro`�„'��E� �2a �� . �'��s'�'�`� r��r��i ��iya��pr � f r k i r i r � 9 9��r � y y�/c Y 1 �; � �" ,I pq��^�:/�"�� i��// r��l� � ti � i,�r as'"i`%� Cr.� ,�� ,, ��im��'�'��"�� o �w,�. ;.: ��, � �3 4 �'� � i�31 � �y "�� s �"as��^�yr b � f� ,a # 'xf ' ; �XN/h/F�%��"" � 6 �,�//�✓�./�� ✓r�/L 9 �g / � y i.��% r�/ t � �t� i*�� a �'�t ��`�S"l W�`r�� e ��} pt„� ?,�',' � � if�r/;�� 0�"4'�' $ � 3�Y 5 s��,� . /*" �' � /J y I v��y �j��ii�iz "� °�>l�r�� ,�,'v��r�/�,..B�S,� �y � � � i�� ,�p<� f�w..��y a,,,,�ae�-. �`4� � i�k �� y� * �,� f � j,� ��""""1"' ,....�. �� M-��ra�-„u �y ��IM� rr� � '�.�� '.r. �;� t�r s;�'., "�+"s�xi.�.., a �' 140 North Prospect Street facing South FIRSTCARBON Figure 4a SOLUTIONSTM Typical Daytime View at a Potential Removal Site 04040014•09/2018�4a_site_photos.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ,'�`: ��_� �� r �' � �� .� �' � �� ti �� . � �x�� , :, " � . � a��r „�'��a�,�?��'� � �k,�'f!/r � i i �'��r'i� �i z . C �� ' v ln a�"4� x s��, � ;�'�'�ai r y z a�y�g,y 7"/M T W � � ��'� ��l�� ',r � ��u st � � h x�so�r �?� y� p; q � � M,^s P ��aH��,yZy z�" � �r f,r y s�$F� ,��'j� y .�' .. � yd�,y 5'�s/ � �✓T " .��' �^ o� ,ii,y �� "i �� n �� a! �� , �F ;� � �/ ei'�' ' y� � Z"^""' �1 '�'' w 4 a � � �� ,�� :� �. 5:'^�o � � ��i�$ ."' `'��&�" .��' � '�&�"`a . .! � ,�,utw�.ar i`�� g ,� " �y �� '�./' s A �...� & d�3� � ✓��Fl�a � ��,, i + � a� �....,-.-- �� ` � ��, y `�" ��l�� , � ��% �., � ,�_ �,'�� 9 � _ � ,�: ' � ,w R��' ��,'^A C��' ��, �� , ��?� �� -��'� _,..�° T� a � �'-.� ��_,_..� ,��,»,.�z ��x � -�� • �.� � �.�,, ra.. .""`� `��rW�� t r�r,�'� � z ,.-�;a a s a �: ..+, ��d{� m,�� Y� � --�.' �t'"'z : ,ay. „�.. '"`� c . .�"...'`��,F,� ^� '�r"... �" +�€�,� �`''�„�-^•� �»--� �� s '"� �s��+� e. > � �y �� '��°�,�� "�;�<�, �� ,� � �� row � �- i'�'� ��a �,�,� � �x�'4 c'� � .. �"y(p�,�R .,� �i{�p .r�w+r � � ��1:^� k�P�SC�'�5 3Y."wl*� ; s p� `��F � ,�� ; }�"� � ��=� �� North Orange-Olive road,250 South of Lincoln Avenue facing North FIRSTCARBON Figure 4b SOLUTIONST"' Typical Daytime View at a Potential Removal Site 04040014•09/2018�46_site_photos.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK When upgrading a billboard, construction at each location would take approximately five days in total. Construction activities would include removing the existing copy, removing the existing billboard sections4, and removing the metal pieces that attach the sign to the top of the billboard structure, which would take approximately two to three days. After the static billboard is removed, a stinger packages would be installed, which would take approximately one day. This would be followed by the installation of the LED faces and illumination of the sign,which would take approximately two days of construction. The proposed digital billboards would operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The illuminated double-sided billboard would cycle through a rotation of images on its display and is proposed to operate under specific criteria to limit the potential for driver distraction. These criteria include, (1) images from the billboard would rotate no more than once every 8 seconds, and; (2) light levels emitted from the billboard would adjust to respond to darker and lighter conditions to provide contrast. The'maximum ambient light output level of the digital billboard sign faces would be 0.3 foot-candle or less at a distance of 250 feet. Furthermore, the billboards would not show video or motion,nor would they emit noise or audio. The timing of these upgrades has not yet been deternuned. However, as discussed above in Project Background, Outfront Media has proposed the conversion of an existing traditional billboard located at 1936 East Katella Avenue (Billboard 1; see Figure 5: Retained Billboard 1— 1936 East Katella Avenue Site Plan) to a digital LED billboard and the removal of a total of five billboard faces. It is reasonably foreseeable that the upgrade of Billboard 1 and removal of five billboard faces would move forward soon after the implementation of the updated Billboard Ordinance. Removal Sites As mentioned above, as part of implementation of the Billboard Ordinance Update, billboards throughout the City of Orange could be removed in the future. Though the City does not have jurisdiction over billboards located in adjacent unincorporated (County) lands, billboards located in the County that affect viewsheds within the City could be removed as part of Relocation Agreements associated with the City's Billboard Ordinance Update. As discussed in Project Background, three specific locations with static billboard faces were identified by Outfront Media for potential removal as part of the proposed upgrade of Billboard 1: 140 North Prospect Street; North Orange Olive Road, 250 feet south of Lincoln Avenue, and 2875 North Orange Olive Road. The billboard at 2875 North Orange Olive Road is located on unincorporated(County)lands that could affect viewsheds within the City. Hand tools and small crane rigs would be used to remove the billboards. The top of the billboards would first be disassembled and removed, and then the poles would be removed to ground level. Only the above-grade portion of the billboard structures would require removal. 4 These sections are comprised of eight metal pieces that would be removed individually. 5 Stringers aze steel braces attached to the back of a billboazd panel that function to support the display face. XX1X Below-surface foundations could remain in place. Materials from the removed billboard could be reused or transported to a recycling facility, or be disposed of at a landfill. It would take approximately one to two working days to remove each of the existing billboard structures. BILLBOARD-SPECIFIC REGULATORY CONTEXT Relevant Lighting Regulations and Standards The California Deparhnent of Transportation (Caltrans) Outdoor Advertising Act and Regulations 2014 Edition (Outdoor Advertising Act) addresses illumination generated by advertising displays by stating that displays may not "interfere with the effectiveness of, or obscure any official traffic sign, device, or signal . . . nor shall any advertising display cause beams or rays of light to be directed at the traveled ways if the light is of an intensity or brilliance as to cause glare or to impair the vision of any driver, or to interfere with any driver's operation of a motor vehicle." Caltrans regulations prohibit images on signs from changing more than once every four seconds.6 With respect to the brightness of signs, Business and Professions Code Section 5403(g) defines the brightness standard for changeable electronic variable message billboards in relation to Vehicle Code Section 21466.5, which provides: No person shall place or maintain or display,upon or in view of any highway, any light of any color of such brilliance as to impair the vision of drivers upon the highway. A light source shall be considered vision impairing when its brilliance exceeds the values listed below. The brightness reading of an objectionable light source shall be measured with a 1%2-degree photoelectric brightness meter placed at the driver's point of view. The maximum measured brightness of the light source within 10 degrees from the driver's normal line of sight shall not be more than 1,000 times the minimum measured brightness in the driver's field of view, except that when the minimum . measured brightness in the field of view is 10 foot-lamberts or less, the measured brighfiness of the light source in foot-lambert shall not exceed 500 plus 100 times the angle,in degrees,between the driver's line of sight and the light source. Under the Business and Professions Code, the most conservative brightness limit with which the LED billboards would have to comply is 500 foot-lamberts, which is equivalent to 1,713 nits.''$ 6 Califomia Department of Transportation. 2014. Outdoor Advertising Act and Regulations 2014 Edition. California Business Professional Code§5200—§5486. � This calculation assumes a minimum measured brightness in the field of view of less than 10 foot-lamberts,and a view angle of zero degree(i.e.,directly in front of the driver). 8 In lighting,the nit is a unit of visible-light intensity,cotnmonly used to specify the brightness of a cathode ray tube or liquid crystal display computer display. One nit is equivalent to one candela per square meter. The candela,is approximately the amount of light emitted by a common tallow candle. 7CXX % ��'J� �� Mt°'A /'" , -r � ,� � 1 � � j ; �� ; \ ��" � � �. � � , I ' � � -- � -� �, � �� 1 � � , �, � < � , 1 . � I \ , � � ti,, ,� � ' �-\ 1 � I , , � , , � � ��-0� I Fl�'V! (qeminixc i i I a� �` (qta•:�e'e�ueu.nu � 17-0' �/142.07� 1 I /'� �{1 I I 1 (�BUILOING I 1 1 I ` 1 I �� l I �� '•` � 1 ! �, ��N� ,, �r -- L� I � N 7�S.J0' �$ �• � 1 1 � 1 1 � \ 1 Source:Leedco Engineers,Inc.,Septemher 2018. FIRSTCARBOOV e Figure 5 SOLUTlONS'" Retained Billboard 1-1936 East Katella Avenue Site Plan 04040014•SO/2018�5_east_katella_ave_site,�lan.cdr CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT INRIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK The Outdoor Advertising Association of America (OAAA) recommends more conservative lighting intensity standards for billboards of the proposed size of a maximum ambient light output level of 0.3 foot-candle at a distance of 250 feet from the billboard faces.9°10 These operational parameters (i.e., 0.3 foot-candle at 250 feet) translate into a brightness of about 300 nits, meaning that the signs would always operate at approximately one-sixth of the maximum brightness level for LED billboards, as set forth by the Outdoor Advertising Act, which is a California State Law. The light levels emitted from the billboards would be set to adjust based upon ambient light conditions at any given time (i.e.,nighttime versus daytime). The proposed ordinance is equivalent to or more restrictive than Caltrans Outdoor Advertising Act, Business and Professions Code Section 5403(g), and OAAA requirements and recommendations. REOUIRED APPROVALS The following discretionary approvals are required by the City of Orange for approval of the proposed project: • The adoption of the IS/MND; • Adoption of a Zoning Code Text Amendment (ZC No. 1292-18) for the Billboard Ordinance to amend Title 17 of the Orange Municipal Code Subsequent activities would be examined in light of the adopted IS/MND to deternune whether additional CEQA documentation would be required pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines for subsequent approvals by the City of Orange and Caltrans, including, but not limited to the following: � Minor Site Plan Review by City of Orange per the City's Billboard Ordinance (City Municipal Code Section 1736.180); • Encroachment Pernuts (If public right-of-way is used); • Outdoor Advertising Permit/Relocation Agreement approval by Caltrans; and • Ministerial approvals, including,but not limited to,building pernuts. INTENDED USES OF THIS DOCUMENT This IS/MND has been prepared to deternune the level of environmental impacts associated with a Billboard Ordinance that could result in 1) the potential removal of existing billboard faces within the City of Orange and, 2) potential upgrade of up to five existing static billboard signs to LED signs within the City of Orange; and, where a potentially significant impact might occur, to identify appropriate mitigation that would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. This 9 For a frame of reference,03 foot-candle is comparable in brightness to the light emanating from a computer monitor,and the light levels emitted from the LED displays would be set to adjust based upon ambient light condirions at any given time(i.e.,nighttime ve�us daytime). lo Setting a standazd in foot-candles is a more appropriate metric by which to judge impacts on sensitive receptors,as a foot-candle measures light intensity experienced at the receptor,whereas measurement in candela/square mete�or nits reveals only the intensity of light at its source. XXXlll document will also serve as a basis for soliciting comments and input from members of the public and public agencies regarding the proposed project. The IS/MND will be circulated for a minimum of 20 days, during which period comments concerning the analysis contained in the IS/MND should be sent to: Ashley Brodkin,Associate Planner City of Orange Community Development Department 300 East Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866 Phone: (714) 744-7238 Email: abrodkin@cityoforange.org Scheduled Public Meetings or Hearing� The City will hold a Planning Commission Hearing at 7:00 p.m. on December 3, 2018 in the Orange Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 300 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866. A notice of a City Council hearing for the proposed project will be distributed in the same manner as this notice once a date is established. The public and interested agencies are invited to attend any of the meetings. x�iv ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. � Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forest ❑ Air Quality Resources � Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas � Hazards&Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality Emissions Materials ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources � Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation � Transportation/Traffic ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities/Services Systems � Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: 1. I find that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and ❑ a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 2. I find tliat alttiough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the � environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 3. I find the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and ❑ an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. - 4. I find that the proposed project may have a °°potentially significant impact" or ❑ "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier doctunent pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 5. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the ❑ environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposqd project,nothing further is required. .�_ ___,�.��t t:� ��.._�_ , o' c anne, - Date . - �6.�'�,cl.� _____ __ _�.. Planning Manager - Date 1 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No ImpacY' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g.,the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analyses may be cross-referenced,as discussed below). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case,a brief discussion should identity the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans and zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a projecYs environmental effects in whatever forxnat is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold,if any,used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified,if any,to reduce the impact to less than significance. 3 CHECKLIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ISSUES: 1. AESTHETICS. Would the YO�2C1: Less than P 1 s;��ao� Potentially With Less Than Signi6cant Mitigation SigniScant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ � ❑ (b) Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to, trees,rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state ❑ ❑ � ❑ scenic hi hwa ? (c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or qualiry of � � � � the site and its surroundin s? (d) Create a new source of substanrial light or glare which would � � � � adversel affect da or ni httime views in the area? Environmental Settin� The Natural Resources Element of the General Plan (page NR-8) states that portions of the City of Orange are characterized by scenic vistas that include hillsides, ridgelines, or open space areas that provide a unifying visual backdrop to the urban environment. These "viewsheds" contribute to the City's identity and quality of life. The Natural Resources Element states that the City will preserve open space areas and view corridors where possible and will encourage landscaping in urban areas to improve boulevards,neighborhoods, commercial, and industrial districts. The State of California designates certain segments of State highways as scenic routes. In Orange County, State Route 1 (SR-1), SR-57, SR-74, and SR-91 are eligible State Scenic Highways. However, the only officially designated State Scenic Highway is a segment of SR-91 from SR-55 to east of Anaheim city limits.11 This segment is approximately is 1.13 miles northeast of the nearest billboard location. The analysis in this section is based, in part, on the Photometric Analysis prepared for the Ciiy of Hayward in Alameda County for the construction of a LED billboard on Arbor Avenue. That billboard is similar in dimension (80 feet in height with frames measuring 14 feet by 48) to the billboards that could be upgraded as part of the Billboard Ordinance Update, so the analysis in that study is used to evaluate the potential light impacts of this project as described in Impact(c). The Photometric Analysis is provided as Appendix B. Impact Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Billboard Locations 1 and 2 are adjacent to SR-55, while Billboard Locations 3, 4, and 5 are adjacent to SR-57. Northbound lanes in the vicinity of these locations provide views towards distant ridgelines to the northeast of the project sites. 11 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic IIighway Mapping System. Website:http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_ livability/scenic_highwayslindex.htm. Accessed August 2018. 5 The Ordinance Update would allow for conversion of existing billboards to electronic billboards with two LED displays. The LED displays would maintain the same orientation as the existing static display. The existing heights of the billboard structures range from 55 to 95 feet. In converting the structures to LED display, the pole heights would not change; however, the smaller "face" of the LED display would result in a reduced overall billboard height. The existing billboard frames are 20 feet by 60 feet (height by width), and would be reduced in size to 14 feet by 48 feet(height by width), which represents a 6-foot reduction in height of the facing and a 12-foot reduction in its width. The conversion to LED would result in a reduction in height and width for the converted billboard facings, as well as the associated removal of additional billboards as required by the Ordinance and Relocation Agreement. The overall effect would be an improvement to intermittent views of distant ridgelines provided to travelers along SR-55 or SR-57. Therefore, the impact on scenic vistas would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway? SR-55 and SR-57 are in the immediate vicinity of the project sites, but are not designated State Scenic Highways, nor are they eligible to become designated State Scenic Highways. The nearest officially designated State Scenic Highway is a segment of SR-91 from SR-55 to east of Anaheim city limits, located approximately 1.13 miles northeast of Billboard Location 2,the closest upgrade location. As discussed in the Project Description, the LED faces would not exceed an output level of 0.3 foot-candle at a distance of 250 feet from the billboard faces. Because SR-91 is over 1.13 miles from the nearest billboard location (Billboard 2), the nighttime lighting would not be visible from SR-91 and would not degrade nighttime views. Furthermore, Billboard Location 2 is located in an urban setting near several other sources of nighttime lighting including car headlights, parking lot lighting, streetlights, security lighting on buildings, and internal lights in buildings. Therefore, the proposed upgrade would have no impact to scenic resources within a designated State Scenic Highway. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 6 c) Substantially degrade the ezisting visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? The project sites are located along the SR-55 and SR-57 corridors, with adjacent development consisting of commercial and residential buildings, local roadways, minimal landscaping,roadway signage, and above-ground infrastructure including power lines. The Billboard Ordinance Update would allow conversion of any of the five billboards specified in the Project Description (Table 1) to LED faces. This conversion would be contingent on the removal of existing billboard faces for each conversion of one billboard to LED display. The overall effect would be to reduce the number of billboards in the City of Orange and within the City's viewshed. Implementation of the Billboard Ordinance Update would change the visual character of the surrounding areas. The existing visual setting of the billboard sites consists of developed areas adjacent to a heavily traveled highway. The upgrade locations are generally surrounded by commercial, residential, light industrial, various roadways, and rail lines. In addition, existing billboards (Billboard Locations 1 and 2) are visible from the elevated neighborhoods on the hillsides to the east. The upgrade from a traditional billboard to an LED digital billboard would not increase obstruction of existing views, as the proposed LED faces would be smaller than the existing static billboards. The nearest sensitive receptors are mobile homes located to the south of Billboard Location 2, approximately 175 feet away. Conversion to an LED face from a static face would not change the visual character of the surrounding area, and would remain consistent with the mixed-use and urban environments surrounding these residences. In addition, the LED face would be in the same orientation as the existing static face,which is oriented toward highway motorists. With respect to brightness, it is not possible to directly compare the light output of existing static billboards to the light output of a LED billboard. It is difficult to quantify the light output of a static billboard (light reflected off vinyl) because there are too many surrounding light sources and the reading would quantify all the light in the vicinity. In comparison, it is possible to adjust the light output for LED lights on digital billboards. Unlike static billboards that reflect surrounding light sources, LED billboards can be programmed to ensure brightness levels are well below applicable standards. The standard that is incoiporated into the proposed City ordinance is that signs cannot have a light output that exceeds 0.3 foot candles at 250 feet, which is approximately one-sixth of the maximum brightness level for LED billboards set forth by the Outdoor Advertising Act. The existing billboards (Billboard Locations 1 and 2) that are visible from the elevated neighborhoods on the hillsides to the east would not be significantly more visible after conversion to LED due to the proposed brightness standard in the Billboard Ordinance Update. The messages on the LED billboards would change,but, as described in Impact 1(d) 7 and required by the proposed Ordinance Update, each static message or image would be displayed for a minimum of 8 consecutive seconds before changing, which is more stringent than the recommendations and standards as set forth by California State Law,12 OAAA, and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Therefore, the proposed enhancement to LED billboards would not substantially change or degrade the visual character, as the sites would remain surrounded by existing urban development, including other pole mounted highway signs that provide information to travelers and the LED faces would exceed the standards of the Outdoor Advertising Act. The signs designated for removal are located along existing roadways in developed urban environments, with commercial, light industrial, and residential uses located nearby, as discussed in the Project Description. Removing existing billboards would not have an impact to the visual character of the surrounding areas. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The nearest sensitive receptors are mobile homes located to the south of Billboard Location 2, approximately 175 feet away. Like the other upgrade locations, the nighttime light source in this residential area are local street lighting, parking lot lighting, headlights from automobile traffic, streetlights, highway lighting, security lighting on buildings, and internal building lights. As described in the Project Description, the proposed Billboard Ordinance Update stipulates that the maximum intensity of light output produced by an electronic billboard display would not exceed 0.3 foot-candle above the ambient light level at any time, as measured using a foot-candle meter at a distance of 250 feet. Because Billboard Location 2 represents the most conservative scenario as the billboard replacement location with the closes sensitive receptors and greatest potential impacts, the following analysis focuses on this site. To evaluate the effect of night-time lighting on the mobile homes 175 feet to the south of Billboard Location 2 and sensitive receptors at all other upgrade locations, this IS/1VIlVD incorporates analysis contained in a lighting study that was conducted for the construction of a billboard with two LED faces in Alameda County, CA13 (Appendix B) because of its similarity to the project. The billboard evaluated in the Alameda County study was 80 feet in height with frames measuring 14 feet by 48 feet (height by width), which is the same as the 'Z Busincss and Professions Code Section 5405(d)(1), 13 The billboazd evaluated in the study was proposed at the southwestem end ofArborAvenue(22083 ArborAvenue),just north of WestA S�eet,in Alameda County. g dimensions stipulated in the proposed Billboard Ordinance update. Specifically, Billboard 2 would be 65 feet in height, with frames measuring 14 feet by 48 feet (height by width). Furthermore, the billboard evaluated in the Alameda County study is the same type of sign with the same brightness level and brightness threshold of significance (0.3 foot-candle above the ambient light level at any time, as measured using a foot-candle meter at a distance of 250 feet) as the proposed billboard upgrades. The billboard evaluated in the Alameda County study and Billboard Location 2 are in similar environments; they are next to a highway with nearby residential uses. The billboard evaluated in the Alameda County study was located within 100 feet from sensitive receptors, whereas Billboard Location 2 is approximately 175 feet from the nearest sensitive receptors. The modeling conducted for the Alameda County billboard demonstrated that the light intensity produced by these billboards, due to their design, height, and configuration, would not exceed 0.3 foot-candle at a distance of 68 feet near the ground and at second-story residential locations. On this basis, the brightness levels of proposed upgrade billboards at nighttime are not anticipated to exceed the threshold established by the Billboard Ordinance Update: Furthermore, as discussed in Impact 1(c), the LED faces would not be significantly brighter than the existing static faces and would not significantly increase ambient nighttime lighting when compared to existing conditions at any of the billboard locations. Therefore, the project would not result in significant light or glare at the nearest residential use. To ensure that the specific upgrade billboard locations in the City of Orange do not have a significant impact on nearby sensitive uses, Mitigation Measure (MM) AES-1 would be imposed to require a site-specific lighting study to confirm that the-maximum intensity of light output produced by billboards authorized pursuant to the Billboard Ordinance Update would not exceed 0.3 foot-candle at a distance of 250 feet. In addition, the project would implement MM AES-2, which would ensure that the LED billboard would include an operating mechanism that turns offthe display or turns it all black � in the event of a malfunction. MM AES-3 requires that the LED signs' operational parameters be provided to the City for review and approval prior to initial operation. The removal component of the project would reduce the amount of nighttime lighting in the removal locations because the existing lighting used to illuminate the billboards would be removed along with the sign faces, and would have a beneficial impact with respect to light and glare. Analysis of Driver Distraction _ Driver distraction could occur due to the changing of electronic messages on the proposed LED billboards. Several federal and State regulations apply to the operation of electronic billboards, as discussed below. • California law allows LED billboards to operate at a minimum dwell time of no less than 4 seconds before the display may transition to the next image. This requirement is set forth in Business and Professions Code second 5405(d)(1),which provides, in pertinent part,". . . 9 no message center display may include any illumination or message change that is in motion or appears to be in motion or that changes in intensity or exposes its message for less than four seconds." • The Outdoor Advertising Association of America (OAAA) likewise recommends that billboards display a message for no less than 4 seconds.l4 • The FHWA, meanwhile, has approved of a similar dwell time standard. According to a FHWA memorandum, the acceptable range for the "[d]uration of each display is generally between 4 and 10 seconds-8 seconds is recommended."1s The Updated Billboard Ordinance requires that "each static message or image shall be displayed for a minimum of eight(8) consecutive seconds before changing, and the transition or blank screen time between one display message and the next shall not exceed one second." The Updated Billboard Ordinance would therefore ensure that any billboard converted to LED pursuant to the Ordinance would exceed the relevant State and federal requirements, and would therefore avoid any significant distraction drivers. Signi�cance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM AES-1 To ensure the lighting of signs does not exceed 03 foot-candle at 250 feet, prior to conversion or relocation of any billboard, the City shall require a site-specific lighting study to be submitted as part of the Minor Site Plan Review. Should the results of the study indicate the maximum intensity of light output produced by this billboard would exceed 0.3 foot-candle at a distance of 250 feet, design modifications shall be incorporated into the billboard design to comply with this regulation. MM AES-2 The plans for the LED billboard to be approved by the City as part of the Minor Site Plan Review shall include an operating mechanism (hardware or software controlled) that turns off the display or turns it to all black in the event of a malfunction or failure in any system or subsystem that results in the display wholly or partly appearing to flash. MM AES-3 The signs' operational lighting parameters shall be provided to the City of Orange Community Development Department for review and approval prior to regular operation of the LED billboard as part of the Minor Site Plan Review, and shall be implemented by the project proponent to ensure no residents or drivers will be adversely affected or impacted by trespass glare lighting. . Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 'a Califomia Department of Transportation. 2012. Caltrans Division of Rescazch and Innovation,Effects of Outdoor Advcrtising Displays on Driver Safety,p.9. October 11. ls U.S.Dept.of Transportation. 2007. Fed.Highway Admin.,Guidance On Off-Premise Changeable Message Signs,p.2. September 25. 10 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997) Less than prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an s��s�ant optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigafton SigniScant No farmland. Would the ro'ect im a�t ��o orated im a�c im aot (a) Convert Prime Farnlland, Unique Fannland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farniland),as shown on the maps prepared � � � � pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Prograzn of the California Resources A enc ,to non-a 'cultural use? (b) Conflict with eacisting zoning for agricultural use, or a � � � � Williamson Act contract? (c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland(as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), ❑ ❑ ❑ � or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 ? (d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to � � � � non-forest use? (e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland,to ❑ ❑ ❑ � non-agricultural use? Environmental Setting The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) produces maps that display farmland in the County. There are no agricultural land or forested areas within or in the vicinity of the project sites. The Department of Conservation Farniland Inventory Map confirms that all project sites are classified as Urban Land.16 Im�act Analvsis a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? None of the project sites support commercial-scale cultivated agricultural activities. The California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program mapping for Orange County designates the project sites as"Urban and Built-Up Land" on the Orange County Important Farmland 2014 map. Therefore, development of the project would not convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farinland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non- agricultural use. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After 1Vlitigation: No Impact ls Department of Conservation. 2014. Orange County Important Farmland. August 10. Website: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2014/ora 14.pdf. 11 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Williamson Act contract? The billboards are located throughout the City of Orange and none of them are in agricultural zoning districts. According to the California Department of Conservation's Agricultural Preserves 2004 map, none of the project sites are not encumbered by a Williamson Act contract.l' Therefore, the project would not conflict with e�cisting agricultural zoning or with a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? The billboards are located in non-forest land zoning districts. This condition precludes the possibility of a conflict with a forest zoning designation. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The project sites do not contain nor are adjacent to any forested land. Therefore, there would be no loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use as a result of the project. No impacts would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? The project sites are not adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of any existing agricultural operations. There is no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Forest Land on any of billboard sites. This condition precludes the possibility of conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use, or forest land to non-forest use. Therefore, no impacts would occur. " Department of Conservation. 2004. Agricultural Preserves 2004. Website:ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/walOrange_WA_03_04.pdf. Accessed August 2018. IZ Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 13 3. AIR QUALITY. (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air Less than pollution control district may be relied upon to make the s��enc following determinations.) Potentially With Less Than Siguificant Mitigation Significant No Would the ro'ect: � a�t in�o orated � e�c im a�t (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air � � � � uali lan7 (b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an � � � � existing or rojected air uali violation? (c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including ❑ ❑ � ❑ releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone recursors ? (d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant � � � � concentrations? (e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substanrial number of � � � � eo le? The project is located in the City of Orange and is within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains bound the SCAB on the north and east while the Pacific Ocean lies to the west of the SCAB. The southern limit of the SCAB is the San Diego County line. The SCAB consists of Orange County, Los Angeles County (except for the Antelope Ualley), the non-desert portion of western San Bernardino County, and the western and Coachella Valley portions of Riverside County. The air pollutants for which national and State standards have been promulgated and that are most relevant to air quality planning and regulation include ozone, nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), respirable particulate matter (PMIo), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Ozone is not directly emitted into, the atmosphere but is the result of atmospheric reactions of NOX and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions in the presence of sunlight. The analysis in this section is based, in part, on the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) analysis completed by FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS). The modeling data is provided in its entirety in Appendix C. Impact Analvsis a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is designed to accommodate growth, to reduce the high levels of pollutants within the areas under the jurisdiction of SCAQMD, to achieve the federal 8-hour ozone standard by 2024, and to minimize the impact on the economy. Projects that are considered to be consistent with the AQMP do not interfere with attainment and do not contribute to the exceedance of an existing air quality violation because this growth is included in the projections utilized in the formulation of the AQMP. Therefore, projects, 14 uses, and activities that are consistent with the applicable assumptions used in the development of the AQMP would not jeopardize attainment of the air quality levels identified in the AQMP, even if they exceed the SCAQMD recommended thresholds. The project would not construct habitable structures. In addition, it would not generate significant employment, as no additional employees would be required to maintain the signs over the maintenance workers required for the existing signs. Therefore, the project would not change or increase population figures over those that have been planned for the area and would be consistent with the AQMP forecasts for this area. Therefore, the project would be consistent with air quality-related regional plans, and would not jeopardize attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards in the region. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an ezisting or projected air quality violation? The project would generate regional criteria air pollutant and ozone precursor emissions resulting from short-term construction and long-term operational activities. SCAQMD has developed regional thresholds of significance for both construction and operational emissions. These thresholds are considered the allowable emissions limit for each project in order for the region to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards. Therefore, a project that would not generate daily regional emissions that exceed SCAQMD thresholds would also not violate or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Construction of the project would result in the temporary generation of criteria pollutant emissions. Construction emissions were estimated for the activities associated with removal of the existing billboards and the installation of billboards. Hand tools and small crane rigs would be used to remove the billboards. It would take approximately one to two working days to remove each of the existing billboard structures. Air pollutant emissions associated with project construction were estimated using the SCAQMD-approved CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) land use emission model. Where project-specific information was not available or unlrnown, default assumptions were used to complete emissions modeling. Table 3 presents the project's maximum daily construction , emissions for each billboard removal and construction. 15 Table 3: Regional Construction Emissions by Construction Activity ;- -: _. , '� ..;, . , �; �. - ` ' ; .' Regional Pollutant Emissions(pounds per day) , � � , Construction Acti"vity � � :VOC ,N�QX CO =`` SOx PMio �-�Mzs,. e Billboard Removal 0.91 8.17 6.56 0.01 0.60 0.50 Billboard Face Upgrades to LEDI 0.46 4.85 2.55 0.005 0.35 0.25 Maximum Daily Emissions 0.91 8.17 6.56 0.01 0.60 0.50 SCAQMD Significance 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant Impact? No No No No No No Notes: � The billboard face upgrades to LED are assuming 1 crane used for four hours and one haul truck used for six hours. VOC=volatile organic compounds;NOX=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoacide;SOX=sulfur oxides; PMIo=particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns; PM2.5=particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns Source of emissions:CaIEEMod Output(Append'uc C) Source of thresholds:South Coast Air Quality Management District 2015 As shown in Table 3, billboard upgrade and removal activities would not exceed any of SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Even with overlapping billboard upgrades and removals occurring at different locations at the same time, regional emissions from the project would not exceed the recommended thresholds of significance. Following upgrade and removal activities, long-term operational emissions would be generated, resulting from the day-to-day operations. Billboards require occasional upkeep and maintenance activities, which generate vehicle trips. The long-term operation of the upgraded billboards would include vehicle trips with minimal and irregular maintenance activities, occurring only as needed (less than once per month and likely only one vehicle). Because these upgraded billboards would not require manual change of images like the static billboards require, it is anticipated these trips would be lesser in frequency and duration than the trips necessary to service the existing billboards that would be removed in order to facilitate the relocation(i.e., the five faces removed for every two new digital faces placed). Accordingly, billboard upgrade and removal activities and operational criteria pollutant emissions would not be anticipated to exceed the recommended thresholds of significance. Therefore, the project would not result in any significant increase in criteria pollutants or contribute to an existing air quality violation or exceed SCAQMD threshold. Additionally, the project will be required to comply with all applicable rules to reduce construction impacts. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Signi�cance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 16 c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? The SCAQNID thresholds of significance represent the allowable amount of emissions each project can generate without generating a cumulatively considerable contribution to regional air quality impacts. Therefore, a project that would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance on a project level also would not be considered to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to these regional air quality impacts. As described above, the project is not expected to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Sensitive receptors are defined as schools, hospitals, resident care facilities, daycare centers, or other facilities that may house individuals with health conditions that would be adversely impacted by changes in air quality. The nearest sensitive receptors are mobile homes located to the south of Billboard Location 2, approximately 175 feet away. Because of the limited amount of construction equipment associated with the upgrades (which would entail replacement of billboard facings) and removals and short duration of associated activities, health risks during upgrade and removal activities would be less than significant. In addition, the project would be required to comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules to reduce impacts associated with upgrade and removal activities. Operation of the project would only require minimal maintenance activities that would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. As such, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Diesel exhaust and VOCs from these diesel engines would be emitted during upgrade and removal activities, which are objectionable odors to some; however, the duration of these activities is expected to be short (one to two days at each billboard location), emissions would disperse rapidly from the project sites, and diesel exhaust odors would be consistent with existing vehicle odors in the area. The project would not be a source of odor during operations. Considering this information, upgrade and removal activities and operation of 17 the project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people; impacts would be less than significant. 5ignificance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 18 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the Y0�2Ct: Lessthan P J s,��aae PotentiaRy With Less Than Significant Mitigation SigniScant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, ❑ � ❑ ❑ policies, or regularions, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? (b) Have a substanrial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, � � � � policies,regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including,but � � � � not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,fillin ,h drolo 'cal interru tion,or other means? (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native � � � � resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? (e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ❑ � ordinance? (fl Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved ❑ ❑ ❑ � local,re 'onal,or state habitat conservation lan? Environmental Settin� The project sites are generally located in highly urbanized settings adjacent to State highways or major thoroughfares and within commercially developed properties with impervious surfaces. No natural habitats are present at the project locations other than urban landscaping. The project sites and their surroundings are characterized by parking lots, commercial buildings, multifamily residential buildings, and the adjacent highway. Impact Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? The upgrade locations and the billboard sites identified for removal are located on commercial developments and have no natural or sensitive habitats, including wetlands or riparian habitats. Migrating birds, such as songbirds, can be affected by human-built structures because of their propensity to migrate at night,their low flight altitudes, and their tendency to be disoriented by artificial light, which makes them vulnerable to collision with obstructions that could 19 eventually lead to their injury or mortality. In addition,birds migrating at night can be strongly attracted to sources of artificial light, particularly during periods of inclement weather. According to the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA), static red lights attract birds and can cause them to circle lights repeatedly resulting is exhaustion and death.18 Transparent and reflective glass can reflect or make the nearby environment (such as trees, vegetation, or food source)visible through structures,which could also lead to migrating bird collision. The billboard upgrades to digital LED lights would not create a substantial change in billboard illumination as described above in Impact 1(c). Colors on the billboard would change every 8 seconds and therefore any red lights produced by the LED billboards would not be static and would not likely attract birds. The billboard would not have transparent or _ reflective surfaces, such as glass or windows that would lead to bird collision. For these reasons, operation of the LED billboards would have a less than significant impact on the movement of migrating birds. Nesting raptors and other migratory birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFVV� Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 2800. As stated above, raptors (such as falcons, hawks, eagles, and owls) and other migratory birds may utilize the existing billboards for foraging or nesting. Construction disturbance near raptor nests can result in the incidental loss of fertile eggs or nestlings, or otherwise lead to nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort, which is considered a taking by the CDFW. MM BIO-1 requires the completion of nesting bird surveys and associated protective measures, when construction is necessary during the nesting season. Implementation of MM BIO-1 would ensure that potential impacts to nesting birds would be minimized to a level that would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM BIO-1 In the event that billboard removal should occur between September 1 and January 31, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct pre- construction surveys for nesting birds to ensure that no nests will be disturbed during project implementation. This sttrvey shall be completed no more than three (3) days prior to the initiation of demolition activities during nesting season. During this survey, the biologist will inspect all billboards and other possible nesting habitats immediately adjacent to the demolition areas for nests. If an active ' nest is found sufficiently close to work areas to be disturbed by demolition, the biologist, in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFV�, will deternune the extent of a demolition-free buffer zone to be established around the nest, typically 250 feet, to ensure that raptor or migratory bird nests will not be disturbed during project demolition. Prior to the la Oliver Milman,environmental reporter for The Guardian. 2016.FAA aims to save millions of birds by changing static red airport lights. March. Website:https://www.theguazdian.com/environmenU2016/mar/24/airport-lights-birds-faa. Accessed October 4,2018. 2� commencement of construction activities and the issuance of any permits, the City of Orange Community Development Department shall verify that all project construction plans include specific notes regarding the requirements of the MBTA, that preconstruction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers(if needed)are noted on the plans. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? The upgrade locations and the billboard sites identified for removal are located in urban environments and have no natural or sensitive habitats, including wetland riparian habitats. Therefore,no impacts would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption, or other means? The upgrade locations and the billboard sites identified for removal are located in urban environments and have no natural or sensitive habitats, including wetland or riparian habitat. Therefore,no impacts would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? There are no wildlife nurseries on the project sites, nor are there any wildlife movement corridors located on or near the project sites. The location of project activities are in urban environments with no habitat on-site or nearby; therefore, no impacts to migratory wildlife corridors would occur because of project implementation. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation l0�easures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 21 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Since project activities would not involve the removal of trees, the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; as such, no impacts would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact � Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? There are a number of Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and two Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) in Orange County.19°20 However, the project sites are not located in a HCPs or NCCPs. Furthermore, the project sites are within an established urban community. Therefore, the project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or another approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Furthermore, according to the Orange County General Plan, the project sites are not within a designated Open Space/Conservation area.21 As such,there is no impact. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact 19 2015. Conservation Plans By Species. Website:https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.aslix?DocumentII�108719&inline. 20 2017. Summary of Natural Community Conservation Plans(NCCPs). Website: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=15329&inline. zl Orange County General Plan. 2005. Resources Element. Website: https://www.ocgov.com/civicaaJfilebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid�0235. AccessedAugust2018. 22 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the Y0�2Ct: Lessthan P 1 significant Potentially With Less Than Signi�icant MitigaHon Significaut No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a � � � � historical resource as defined in 15064.5? (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an � � � � archaeolo 'calresource ursuantto 15064.5? (c) D'uectly,or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource � � � � or site or uni ue eolo ic feature? (d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of � � � � dedicated cemeteries? Environmental Setting As discussed in the Project Description, the billboards are all located in urban environments, and no subsurface disturbance would be required for the upgrades or removals. Impact Anal,� a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? The Billboard Ordinance Update would allow the faces of existing static billboards located in the City's Freeway Corridor to be upgraded with LED faces, which would not require any ground disturbance. For the removal sites, only the above-grade portion of the billboard structures would be removed; the removal would not require ground disturbance. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 36, sets forth policies related to Parks, Forests, and Public Property. Under 36 CFR 60, a property is recommended for possible inclusion on the National Register if it is at least 50 years old. Because the earliest billboards were built in the 1970s, they are not more than 50 years old and therefore do not constitute historic structures. As such, the project would not introduce new impacts on any existing historic resources. Therefore,no impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? The Billboard Ordinance Update would allow the faces of existing static billboards to be upgraded with LED faces. This conversion would not require ground disturbance. For the removal sites, only the above-grade portion of the billboard structures would be removed; the removal would not require ground disturbance. Because the conversion to LED faces and billboard removal do not involve any ground disturbance, the project would not cause adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore,no impact would occur. 23 Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? As discussed in Impacts 5(a) and 5(b), the project does not involve any ground disturbance, and thus would not destroy a unique paleontological resource. Therefore, no impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact d) Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? As discussed in Impacts 5(a) and 5(b), the project does not involve any ground disturbance, and thus would not disturb any potential human remains. Therefore,no impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact 24 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the YO�BCI.' Less than P J s��s�enr Potentially With Less Than Signiticant Mitigafion Signi�icant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,includin the risk of loss,in' or death involvin : i) Rupture of a lrnown earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ � ❑ substantial evidence of a lrnown fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geolo S ecial Publication 42. ii Stron seismic ound shalcin ? ❑ ❑ � ❑ iii Seismic-related ound failure,includin li uefaction? ❑ ❑ � ❑ iv Landslides? ❑ ❑ � ❑ Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? ❑ ❑ ❑ � (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially � � � � result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, li uefacrion or colla se? (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life ❑ ❑ � ❑ or ro e ? (e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers ❑ ❑ ❑ � are not available for the dis osal of waste water? Environmental Setting The City of Orange is located in the center of Orange County, and according to the 1998 California Geological Survey, it is not located in any earthquake fault zone nor does it border any fault lines.ZZ According to the more recent City of Orange General Plan Update EIR, the City of Orange is in a seismically active zone surrounded by four large active faults: the Whittier- Elsinore fault, the Newport-Inglewood fault,the San Andreas fault, and the San Jacinto fault.z3 Seismic-related ground failure most commonly occurs in areas underlain by loose, unconsolidated soils (e.g., sandy soils) and high groundwater levels. According to the California Department of Conservation, the upgrade locations along the SR-57 are located within a State- designated Liquefaction Hazard Zone.24 These zones are areas where historical occurrence of liquefaction, or local geological, geotechnical, and groundwater conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displacements such that mitigation as defined in the Public Resources Code Section 2693(c) would be required. As presented in Section 2693, the provisions governing development within a Seismic Hazard Zone are primarily concerned with the structural integrity of existing and future buildings for human occupancy. 'Z Califomia Geological Survey. 1998. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Orange Quadrangle. Website: http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/5HP/EZRIM/Maps/ORANGE EZRIM.pdf. 23 Orange General Plan. 2010. Program Environmental Impact Report. Website: https://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter�ew/584/General-Plan-Environmental-Impact-Report-EIR-PDF. 24 Califomia Geographical Survey. 1998. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Orange Quadrangle. Website: http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Maps/ORANGE_EZRIM.pdf. AccessedAugust2018. 25 �mpact Anal,Ysis a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. The project sites are not located within the vicinity of any Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. To ensure the project upgrades and removal are conducted safely, construction and design would be undertaken using standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques in accordance with the 2016 California Building Code. As such, the impacts related to potential rupture of a lrnown earthquake fault would be less than significant. ii. Strong seismic ground shal�ng? The project sites are located within a seismically active region and strong shaking would be expected during the lifetime of the project, which could damage future improvements on the site and expose people to injury. To avoid or minimize potential damage from seismic shaking and liquefaction, the LED upgrades shall be implemented using standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques in accordance with the 2016 California Building Code. The impact would be less than significant. iri. Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? As mentioned above, some the billboard locations are located within State designated liquefaction zones. However, the project would not construct structures intended for human occupancy. Therefore,impacts would be less than significant. iv. Landslides The project sites are relatively flat and already developed with residential and commercial buildings and the probability of landslides occurring during a seismic event is low. Furthermore, the project would not construct structures intended for human occupancy. Therefore, a landslide-related impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 26 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Upgrades from traditional billboard to LED digital billboards and removal of the existing billboards that would occur through implementation of the Billboard Ordinance Update would not consist of any earth-disturbing activities and would not result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Therefore,no impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required 5ignificance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landsliding, lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction, or collapse? As previously addressed, the LED upgrades would be implemented using standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques in accordance with the 2016 California Building Code. As such, the project would be compliant with all applicable State and local requirements. Therefore,the iinpact associated with unstable geologic unit would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial.risks to life or property? The project would not construct structures intended for human occupancy, which precludes substantial risks to life or property as a result of expansive soils. As such, the project would be compliant with all applicable State and local requirements. Therefore, the impact associated with expansive soils would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The project does not propose to use septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore,no impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact 27 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Lessthan signir,cant Woul[I tlle j�YojeCt.' Potentially With Less Than Signilicant Mitigation SigniScant No Im act Inco oreted Im act Im act (a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, � � � � that ma have a si 'ficant im act on the environment? (b) Conflict with an applicable plan,policy or regulation adopted for � � � � the ose of reducin the emissions of eenhouse ases? I�act Anal,Ysis a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Projects generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during construction and operation (e.g., mobile emissions, emissions from generation of electricity for operations, emissions from the transport of materials). This analysis is restricted to GHGs identified by Assembly Bill (AB) 32, which include carbon dioxide (COz), methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. The SCAQMD GHG Working Group recommended interim GHG significance thresholds to review project impacts. Although these thresholds are still"interim"thresholds at the time of this analysis, the thresholds represent the most applicable thresholds supported by substantial evidence. These thresholds are also widely accepted by lead agencies in the region and by SCAQMD. According to the City of Orange Local Interim Guidance Memo for Greenhouse Gas Analysis, dated April 26, 2010, the recommended GHG thresholds for residential, commercial, or mixed use development would be 3,000 metric tons (MT) carbon dioxide equivalents (COze)per year. During upgrade and removal activities, GHG emissions would be generated by construction activities such as the operation of construction vehicles, material hauling, and construction worker vehicle trips. These emissions would be considered short-term in duration. Construction emissions related to upgrade and removal activities were estimated using CaIEEMod (version 2016.3.2). As shown in Appendix C, the analysis shows that GHG emissions were estimated to be 5 MT COze for each billboard removal and 1 MT COze generated for each billboard upgrade. The exact timing of the upgrades and removals are not laiown at this time, however, as discussed above in Project Background, Outfront Media has proposed the conversion of an existing traditional billboard located at 1936 East Katella Avenue (Billboard 1) to a digital LED billboard and the removal of a total of five billboard faces. It is reasonably foreseeable that the upgrade of Billboard 1 and removal of five billboard faces would occur soon after the implementation of the updated Billboard Ordinance in 2019. However, the GHG emissions related to upgrade and removal activities is negligible when compared to the 3,000 MT CO2e per year threshold. 28 Operational or long-term GHG emissions occur over the life of the project. Motor vehicle, water, and waste sources of GHG emissions would be negligible during operation. LED digital billboards (programmable electronic signs) are subject to energy e�ciency requirements under Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. The billboard is required to be dimmable, which would reduce energy use and GHG emissions associated with the generation of electricity. The proposed LED digital billboard would be illuminated 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. The light levels emitted from the billboard would be set to adjust based upon ambient light conditions at any given time (i.e., nighttime versus daytime). Each billboard upgraded to LED would be used for a total of 8,760 hours per year, which would require the use of approximately 66 megawatt-hours of electricity annually. Southern California Edison would supply the electrical energy needed to illuminate each billboard. Based on an estimated 66 megawatt-hours of electricity use annually for each billboard, each of the project's electronic billboards would be expected to generate 21 MT COze per year for a total of 105 MT COZe per year. The project's expected upgrade and removal activities and operational GHG emissions would not exceed the recommended threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year, and, therefore, GHG impacts related to the operation of the project would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? The project is subject to State of California, regional, and local plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Projects that are inconsistent or that conflict with the applicable plans would result in a significant project and cumulative impact unless mitigation was available to eliminate the inconsistency or conflict. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) Scoping Plan contains measures designed to reduce the State's emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 to comply with Assembly Bill (AB) 32. The Scoping Plan states, "The 2020 goal was established to be an aggressive, but achievable, mid-term target, and the 2050 GHG emissions reduction goal represents the level scientists believe is necessary to reach levels that would stabilize climate."ZS The Governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 32 in September 2016, giving CARB the statutory responsibility to reduce the GHG emissions to at least 40 percent below the Statewide GHG emissions limit no later than December 31, 2030. The 2017 Clunate Change Scoping Plan Update addressing the SB 32 targets was adopted on December 14, 2017. 25 ARB 2008. Initial AB32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Document. Website:https://www.azb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document /scopingplandocument.htm. 29 The City of Orange has not adopted a GHG reduction plan applicable to new development projects. Since no other applicable local or regional Climate Action Plan is in place, the project is assessed for its consistency with the CARB adopted Scoping Plan. The CARB Scoping Plan identifies recommended measures for multiple GHG emission sectors and the associated emission reductions needed to achieve the year 2020 emissions target each sector has a different emission reduction target. Most of the measures target the transportation and electricity sectors. There are several implementation action items related to energy,most of which relate to energy use in commercial or residential buildings. None of the implementation action items would .be directly applicable to the upgrade of billboards from traditional faces to LED faces and operation of those LED billboards. As such, the project would not significantly hinder or delay the State's ability to meet the reduction targets contained in AB 32 and SB 32, or conflict with implementation of the Scoping Plan. As discussed in Impact 7(a), the project would not generate substantial GHG emissions during either construction or operations. For the reasons discussed above, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the GHG emissions. As such,impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 30 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Lessthan s��;r�oc Would the project: rocent�auy wicn Less Than Significant MitigaHon SigniScant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous ❑ ❑ � ❑ materials? (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the envuonment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions � � � � involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment7 (c) Emit hazazdous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile ❑ � ❑ ❑ of an e�stin or ro osed schoolT (d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section � � � � 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the ublic or the environment? (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public � � � � airport or public use auport, would the project result in a safety hazard for eo le residin or workin in the ro'ect area? (fl For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in ❑ ❑ ❑ � the ro'ect area? (g) Impair implementarion of or physically interfere with an adopted � � � � emer enc res onse lan or emer enc evacuation lan? (h) Expose people or shuctures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are � � � � adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are internuxed with wildlands? Environmental Settin� The area surrounding the project sites contain residential and commercial land uses as well as transportation corridors. Some of the billboards that could be upgraded or removed as a result of the Billboaxd Ordinance Update may have been constructed in the 1970s or earlier, and could contain asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-based paint. It is possible that the surrounding land uses utilize some hazardous materials such as cleaning products, and trucks could also transport hazardous materials along SR-55 and SR-57. No known Cortese List (Section 65962.5(a)), sites are located on the project sites. The nearest potential hazardous site to a project site is a gas station adjacent to the Billboard 1 location. The two closest airports to the project site are John Wayne International Airport and Fullerton Municipal Airport. John Wayne International Airport is over 7.5 miles south, and the Fullerton Municipal Airport is over 7.5 miles northwest of the nearest upgrade location (Billboard Location 4). The project sites are not located within the vicinity of a private airport. Finally, the project sites are in urban environments and are not located near wildlands. 31 I�n,pact Anal,� a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials? Upgrades to LED faces and billboard removal may involve the use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials such as gasoline, diesel fuel, lubricating oil, hydraulic oil, lubricating grease, automatic transmission fluid,paints, solvents, glues, and other substances used during construction. Any handling of hazardous materials would be limited in both quantity and concentrations. Furthermore, all upgrade and removal activities would be required to conform to Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, US Deparhnent of Transportation (DOT), State of California, and local laws, ordinances, and procedures. Finally, operation of the project would require sporadic maintenance by a negligible number of workers and trucks, and would not involve the use of any hazardous materials with the potential to significantly impact the public. Therefore, with adherence to applicable State, local, and federal requirements, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? For the billboards that would be removed as part of the project, only the above-grade portion would be removed; the below surface foundations would remain. Disposal of the billboard structures would comply with local and State regulations. Some of the existing billboard structures were constructed in the 1970s and, therefore, could contain asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-based paint. However, the impacts related to asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint would be less than significant through compliance with local and State regulations and with the implementation of MM HAZ-1, which includes measures to reduce potential impacts to construction workers associated with lead-based paint or other hazardous building materials (e.g.,Universal Waste). Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM HAZ-1 The following measures shall be implemented during billboard removal activities: • In conformance with State and local laws, including California Health and Safety Code section 19827.5, a visual inspection and possible sampling shall be completed prior to the removal of the billboard structures to determine the presence of asbestos, lead-based paint, or other hazardous building materials. 32 • If this assessment finds presence of such materials, the project applicant shall create and implement a health and safety plan to ensure workers are not � exposed to contaminants in excess of OSHA and other applicable State and federal standards and associated risks associated with hazardous materials during demolition,renovation of affected structures,transport, and disposal. • During billboard removal activities, all materials containing lead-based paint shall be removed in accordance with Cal OSHA Lead in Construction Standard, Title 8, CCR 1532.1, including employee training, employee air monitoring and dust control. • During billboard removal activities, all materials containing asbestos andlor lead- based paint shall be handled and removed by qualified professionals in accordance with applicable regulations, including SCAQMD Regulation XIV, Rule 1403; Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Section 66261.24; Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Section 1532.1. • Any debris or soil containing asbestos lead-based paint or coatings shall be disposed of at landfills that meet acceptance criteria for the waste being disposed. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The nearest school within a mile of each billboard location is as follows: • California Elementary School is approximately 0.55 mile northeast of Billboard Location 1. • Sycamore Elementary School and Portola Middle School are approximately 0.69 mile southeast and 0.59 mile southeast of Billboard Locations 4 and 5,respectively. • West Orange Elementary is approximately 0.85 mile east of Billboard Location 3. • There are no schools within 1 mile of Billboard Location 2. - Therefore, the implementation of the proposed project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school, and no impact would occur. Demolition activities to remove billboard signs could occur within 0.25 mile of a school. As mentioned in Impact 8(b), existing billboards could contain asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-based paint. Adherence to MM HAZ-1 and all applicable federal, State, and local regulations would mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: Implement MM HAZ-1 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 33 d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? As previously stated, a gas station on the adjacent property north of the Billboard 1 location is an open Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Cleanup Site. There were four Cleanup Action Reports submitted from 2006 to 2014 that collectively extracted 5,076 pounds of soil vapor from the site. A Path-to-Closure Plan (PTCP) was reviewed on May 8, 2018, and reported that the case should remain open in spite of ineeting policy criteria. A previous PTCP revealed Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) remediation completion in 2017; a subsequent PTCP is projected for September 30, 2018.26 However, the billboard upgrade - from the traditional face to digital LED would use the existing billboard structure and would not require ground disturbing activities, which precludes significant hazard to the public or the environment. Removal sites could also be located adjacent to hazardous materials sites. However, only the above-grade portion of the billboard structures would be removed; below- surface foundations would remain in place. Removing billboards would not require ground disturbing activities, which precludes significant hazard to the public or the environment. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The two closest airports to the project site are John Wayne International Airport and Fullerton Municipal Airport. John Wayne International Airport is over 7.5 miles south and the Fullerton Municipal Airport is over 7.5 miles northwest of the nearest upgrade location, Billboard Location 4. This condition precludes the possibility of the project resulting in a safety hazard. There would be no impact. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact � For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project Area? There are no private airstrips in the vicinity of the project sites. This precludes the possibility of the project resulting in a safety hazard. Therefore,no impact would occur. Z6 State Water Resources Control Board. 2015. GeoTrackez Website: https://geotracker.waterboazds.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605910783. AccessedAugust 16,2018. 34 ) Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The project does not involve the construction of any new signs. The existing signs do not interfere with traffic access or evacuation during an emergency. Therefore, no impact would occur. ' Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, because there are no wildlands on or surrounding the project sites. The project sites have extensive history of development. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required 5ignificance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact 35 9. AYDROLOGY AND WATER UALITY. Would Less tLan Q s��t tlle pYo,jeCt: PotentiaRy With Less Than Significant MitigaHon Significant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge � � � � re uirements? (b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer voluxne or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the prod�tction rate of pre-existing ❑ ❑ ❑ � nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which pemuts have been granted? (c) Substanrially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, � � � � in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site. (d) Substantially alter the e�sting drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, � � � � or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? (e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of eacisting or planned storm water drainage systems or ❑ ❑ � ❑ rovide substantial additional sources of olluted runoff? Otherwise substantiall de ade water uali ? ❑ ❑ � ❑ (g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map ❑ ❑ ❑ � or other flood hazard delineation ma ? (h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would � � � � im ede or red'uect flood flows? (i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the ❑ ❑ ❑ � failure of a levee or dam? (j Inundation b seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ � (k) Potenrially impact stormwater runoff from construction � � � � activities? (1) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post-construction � � � � activities? (m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage,vehicle or equipment fizeling,vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, ❑ ❑ � ❑ hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? (n) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the � � � � beneficial uses of the receivin waters? (o) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or � � � � volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? (p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or � � � � surroundin areas? 36 Environmental Setting Project Area The project area is urban and is covered with impervious surfaces in the form of buildings and paved roadways. The average annual precipitation in Orange County is 12.85 inches per yeax.Z� The only surface body of water that exists in the surrounding project area is the Santa Ana River, which is approximately 100 feet from Billboard Location 4. No surface bodies of water traverse the project sites. �mpact Analysis a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? For upgrading the billboards, construction activities would include removing the existing copy, removing the existing billboard sections28, and removing the metal pieces that attach the sign to the top of the billboard. After removing the static billboard faces, a stinger package29 would be installed followed by the installation of the LED faces. For the removal of existing billboards, hand tools and small crane rigs would be used. The top of the billboards would first be disassembled and removed, and then the poles would be removed to - ground level. Only the above-grade portion of the billboard structures would require removal. Below-surface foundations could remain in place. No ground disturbance would be required for upgrades of removals. Construction activities could allow surface water to carry small quantities of pollutants (e.g., oil or fuel used in construction equipment) off-site, thereby potentially affecting local waterways by degrading water quality. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requires implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). BMPs may include installing sediment barriers such as silt fence and fiber rolls,maintain equipment and vehicles used for construction, tracking controls such as stabilizing entrances to the construction site, and developing and implementing a spill prevention and cleanup plan. The California Stormwater Quality Association's (CASQA) California Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook (2003),30 contains standard, effective BMPs. Implementation of BMPs would ensure impacts would be less than significant. The project would include limited conshuction activities for short durations (i.e. one to two days at each location) at urban sites, and would not substantially affect water quality standards. The impact would be less than significant. . Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 27 MWDOC. 2014. Annual Rainfall in Orange County,CA. Website:https://www.mwdoc.com/wp-contentluploads/2017/07/Rainfall-1970- 2014.pd£ Accessed August 16,2018 Ze These sections aze comprised of eight metal pieces that would be removed individually. 29 Stringers are steel braces attached to the back of a billboazd panel that function to support the display face. 3o Califomia Stormwater Quality Association. 2013. Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook. January. Website: https://www.casqa.org/sites/defaulUfilesBMPHandbooksBMP_NewDevRedev_Complete.pdf. Accessed October 3,2018. 37 b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? The project would not utilize groundwater sources, and there would be no need to drill wells to supply water for the project. The proposed upgrades and removals would not add to .existing impervious surface conditions. Therefore, no impact would occur regarding the depletion of groundwater. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? The proposed upgrades would occur using pole structures that already exist and would not require ground disturbance. As such, the proposed upgrades would not alter existing drainage patterns of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off=site. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. The removal sites are located in urbanized areas generally over impervious surfaces. No earth would be disturbed as a result of removal activities and no runoff would occur. In addition, removal of the signs would not require any ground disturbance, and would not affect the amount of impervious surface or the rate of runoff from any of the sites. Therefore, . the impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:N/A Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? The proposed upgrades would occur using pole structures that already exist and would not require ground disturbance. As such the proposed upgrades would not alter existing drainage patterns of the project sites including the alteration of the course of a sfiream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding. Therefore,the impact would be less than significant. 38 The removal sites are located in urbanized areas generally over impervious surfaces. In addition,removal of the signs would not require any ground disturbance and would not affect the amount of impervious surface or the rate of runoff from any of the sites. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of ea�isting or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? The project would upgrade traditional faces to LED digital faces on existing billboard structures. The upgrades would utilize pole structures that already exist and would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the project sites. Therefore, the upgrades would not substantially impact the amount of runoff from the sites. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. The removal sites are located in urbanized areas, generally over impervious surfaces. No earth would be disturbed as a result of removal activities and no runoff would occur. In addition, removal of the signs would not affect the amount of impervious surface on any of the removal sites and thus would not impact runoff amounts. Therefore,the impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact � Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? The project would not change the amount of impervious surfaces compared with current conditions at any of the project locations. Therefore, the project would not substantially degrade water quality, and impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? The proposed upgrades and removals do not include the construction or demolition of any housing. This precludes the possibility of housing being placed within a 100-year flood hazard area. Therefore, no impact would occur. 39 Significance Determination:No Impact. Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Construction of housing or habitable structures would not occur as part of the project. This precludes the possibility of structures being placed within a 100-year flood hazard area. Therefore,no impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Construction of housing or habitable structures would not occur as part of the project. This precludes the possibility of exposing people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. Therefore,no impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? A seiche is a seismically or wind-induced wave on an enclosed body of water such as a lake or reservoir. There are no lakes or reservoirs in the vicinity, so there would be no seiche hazard. Tsunami inundation would not occur because the project sites are over 11 miles from the Pacific Ocean. The projeot sites are located in a relatively flat area, so mudflows are unlikely to occur. Therefore,no impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact k) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? As addressed in Impact 9(a), the NPDES program regulates industrial pollutant discharges, including construction activities. Implementation of the project would require compliance with all the NPDES requirements including the submittal and certification of plans and 40 details showing BMPs that would be implemented as part of project construction. As such, stormwater impacts from construction would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 1) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post-construction activities? The project would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces from current conditions at any of the project locations and would not substantially impact stormwater runoff post- construction. Therefore,the impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? The Billboard Ordinance Update would allow the upgrade of existing traditional billboards to LED billboards and include the removal of existing billboards. The upgrades and removals would not require ground disturbance and would therefore not affect the discharge of stormwater pollutants. As described in Impact 9(a) construction activities could allow surface water to carry small quantities of pollutants (e.g., oil or fuel used in construction equipment) off-site, thereby potentially affecting local waterways by discharging stormwater pollutants. The NPDES requires implementation of BMPs as described in further detail in Impact 9(a). Implementation of BMPs would ensure impacts would be less than significant. Therefore impacts would be less than significant Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact n) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? As described in Impact 9(e), the project would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces from current conditions at any of the project locations. As such, the project would not substantially change current conditions of receiving waters. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. 5ignificance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact 41 Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact o) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? As described in Impact 9(e), the project would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces from current conditions at any of the project locations. As such, the project would not create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runofF. Therefore,the impact would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? As described in Impact 9(e), the project would not require ground disturbance at any of the retained billboard locations or removal sites. Because the project would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces and would not require ground disturbance, it would not create would not increase potential erosion from the project sites. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 42 10. LAND USE/PLANNING. Would the YO�2C1: Less than P J - ss�� Potentially With Less Than Significant MiHgaHon Signi£�cant No Im act Inco arated Im act Im act a Ph sicall divide an established communi ? ❑ ❑ ❑ � (b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy, or regulation ofan agency with jurisdiction over the project(including,but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, ❑ ❑ � ❑ or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or miti atin an environmental effect? (c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural � � � � communi conservation lan? Environmental Setting The project sites are within established urban community that has an extensive history of development. There are a number of HCP and two NCCPs in Orange County.31,3z No HCPs or NCCPs cover any of the project sites. Im�act Analysis a) Physically divide an established community? The physical division of an established community typically refers to the construction of a physical feature, such as an interstate highway or railroad tracks, or removal of a means of access, such as a local road or bridge that would impair mobility within an existing community or between a community and outlying area. Conversion of static billboard faces to LED faces and the removal of billboards would not result in the disruption of division of an established community. As such,no impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The City of Orange Municipal Code (Billboard Ordinance, Municipal Code Title 5—Chapter 5.62, Signs and Billboards) does not currently allow the construction and operation of digital billboards within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. The City of Orange is currently updating its Municipal Code to allow for digital billboards within City limits and within the designated Freeway Corridor only. If adopted, the updated Billboard Ordinance would 31 2015. Conscrvation Plans By Spccies. Websitc:hrips://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandlcr.ashx?DocumentID=108719&inlinc. 32 2017. Summary of Natural Community Conservation Plans(NCCPs). Website: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.aslix?DocumentID=15329&inline. 43 include a provision for Relocation Agreements that would allow a billboard company to convert an existing traditional billboard to digital in exchange for removing other billboards containing at least five billboard faces. Furthermore, the electronic billboards would be subject to additional stipulations including height, size of sign face, images displayed, setbacks for any property zoned single-family residential, and maximum intensity of light as defined in Section 17.36.180,Billboards, as described in the Project Description. � In addition, the project would be subject to the Caltrans Outdoor Advertising Act and Section 21466.5 of the California Vehicle Code. The project's compatibility with these standards is discussed extensively in the Project Description and in Impact 1(d) of this IS/MND where it was determined that the project would be consistent with these policies and regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The project sites are not located in a HCPs or NCCPs, which precludes the potential for conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP or NCCP. Project activities would all take place in an urbanized environment that has largely been built out with other uses. As such, there is no impact. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact 44 11. 1��IINERAL RESOURCES. Would the ro'ecr: L�9'ba° P J Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant MiHgation Significa¢t No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that � � � � would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific ❑ ❑ ❑ � lan or other land use lan? Environmental Setting According to the City of Orange General Plan, no lrnown mineral deposits exist at any of the project sites. �mpact Analysis a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? The project would not involve subsurface construction or mineral extraction. Therefore, implementation of the proposed upgrades or removals would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State. No impacts would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? The project would not involve subsurface construction or mineral extraction. Therefore, implementation of the proposed upgrades or removals would not result in the loss of availability of locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. No impacts would occur. � Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 45 12. NOISE. Would the Yo'ect result in: Less than P > s�g��aot Potentially With Less Than SigniQcant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, ❑ � ❑ ❑ or a licable standards of other a encies? (b) Exposure of persons to or generarion of excessive groundborne � � � � vibration or oundborne noise levels? (c) A substanrial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the � � � � ro'ect vicini above levels existing without the ro'ect? (d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ❑ � ❑ ❑ ro�ect? (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public � � � � airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residin or workin in the ro'ect area to excessive noise levels? (fl For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to ❑ ❑ ❑ � excessive noise levels? �mpact Analvsis a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Construction Noise Impacts Removal of existing billboard structures could involve the use of hand tools, a haul truck, and a crane. Upgrading the traditional billboard to a digital LED billboard would involve similar tools. The removal and upgrade locations are all located in urban areas along busy roadway corridors with associated. traffic noise. Noise generated by the proposed construction activities would temporarily elevate noise levels at nearby noise sensitive receptors for a short duration. The loudest piece of heavy equipment that would operate at • each site would be a large crane. Typical maximum noise levels generated by a large crane are documented to range up to approximately 85 A-weighted decibel (dBA)L,,,�at 50 feet.33 Section 8.24.050 of the City's Municipal Code states that noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property are exempt from the provisions of Chapter 8.24, Noise Control chapter of the Municipal Code, provided said activities take place between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on any day except for Sunday or a Federal holiday, or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Sunday or a Federal holiday. Although there could be a relatively high single event noise exposure potential causing an internuttent noise nuisance, the effect on longer-term (hourly or daily) ambient noise levels 33 FHWA 2006. Highway Construction Noise Handbook,August. 46 would be small but could result in excessive noise levels leading to levels of annoyance or sleep disturbances at nearby sensitive receptors. However, compliance with the pernussible construction hours established by the City's Municipal Code would reduce the effects of noise produced by construction activities on longer-term (hourly or daily) ambient noise levels, and would also reduce potential impacts that could result in annoyance or sleep disturbances at nearby sensitive receptors. Implementation of MM NOI-1, which requires implementation of best management noise reduction techniques and practices would ensure that construction noise levels would not expose persons to noise levels in excess of established standards. Therefore, with implementation of MM NOI-1, the potential short-term construction noise impacts on sensitive receptors in the project vicinity would be reduced to a less than significant level. Operational Noise Impacts � The proposed LED digital billboards would be located along a freeway corridor,where traffic is the predominate source of noise. The proposed LED digital billboards are not designed to emit any sound, and the project would not generate regular vehicle trips. Therefore, implementation of the project would not expose people to excessive noise levels associated with the introduction of new stationary noise sources or an increase in the number of vehicle trips. No tra�c-related noise impacts or stationary operational noise impacts would occur. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM NOI-1 To reduce potential construction noise impacts, the following multi-part - mitigation measure shall be implemented for the project: • The construction contractor shall ensure that all internal combustion engine- driven equipment is equipped with mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. • The construction contractor shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a construction project area. In addition, the project contractor shall place such stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. • The construction contractor shall prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. " • The construction contractor shall, to the maximum extent practical, locate on- site equipment staging areas so as to maximize the distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. _.. Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact � 47 b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? The City of Orange has not established a standard for excessive groundborne vibration levels resulting from construction activities. However, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has established industry accepted standards for vibration impact criteria and impact assessment in its Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment document(FTA 2006). The FTA guidelines include thresholds for construction vibration impacts for various structural categories. In extreme cases, excessive groundborne vibration has the potential to cause structural damage to buildings. Common sources of groundborne vibration include construction activities such as blasting, pile driving and operating heavy earthmoving equipment. Construction vibration impacts on building structures are generally assessed in terms of peak particle velocity (PP�. For purposes of this analysis, project related impacts are expressed in terms of PPV. Short-term Construction Vibration Impacts Of the variety of equipment that would be used to upgrade the traditional billboard to a digital LED billboard, cranes would produce the greatest groundborne vibration levels. Cranes produce groundborne vibration levels ranging up to 0.051 inch per second(in/sec)peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet from the operating equipment.34 Impact equipment such as pile drivers would not be used during construction or removal of any of these sites. The closest off-site structures to each of the upgrade billboard locations are located more than 25 feet from proposed construction areas where heavy equipment such as cranes, would operate. At this distance, groundborne vibration levels would range up to 0.051 PPV from the operation of a crane. This is well below the FTA damage threshold criteria of 0.12 in/sec PPV for the most sensitive type of structures: buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage. Therefore, impacts resulting from construction-related groundborne vibration levels would be less than significant. _.. Operational Vibration Impacts Upon completion of construction, the project would not include any permanent sources of groundborne vibrations. As such, implementation of the project would not expose persons within the project vicinity to excessive groundborne vibration levels. Therefore, project related groundborne vibration impacts would be considered less than significant. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 34 FHWA 2006. Highway Construcrion Noise Handbook,August. 48 ' c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? The proposed LED digital billboards are not designed to emit any sound, and the project would not generate regular vehicle trips. Therefore, the project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels compared with noise levels that would exist without the project. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project � vicinity above levels existing without the project? As discussed in Impact 12(a), the removal and upgrade locations are all located in urban areas along busy roadway corridors with associated traffic noise. Noise generated by proposed construction activities would temporarily elevate noise levels at nearby noise sensitive receptors for a short duration. This noise would result from the temporary use of heavy construction equipment. Although there would be a relatively high single event noise exposure potential causing internuttent noise nuisance, the effect on longer-term (hourly or daily) ambient noise levels would be small. However, restricting the permissible hours of construction and implementing best management noise reduction techniques and practices, would reduce the effects of noise produced by construction activities on longer-term (hourly or daily) ambient noise levels, and would reduce potential impacts that could result in annoyance or sleep disturbances at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, compliance with Chapter 8.24 of the City's Municipal Code and implementation of MM NOI-1 would reduce impacts from temporary increases in ambient noise levels due to construction activity to less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: Implement MM NOI-1 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The two closest airports to the project site are John Wayne International Airport and Fullerton Municipal Airport. John Wayne International Airport is over 7.5 miles south, and the Fullerton Municipal Airport is over 7.5 miles northwest of the nearest retained billboard location, Billboard Location 4. In addition, none of the project sites are located within the boundaries of an airport land use plan. Therefore, implementation of the project would not 49 expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels associated with public airport noise, and no impacts associated with airport noise would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact � For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? None of the project sites are located within 2 miles of a private airport. Therefore, no impacts associated with private airstrip noise would occur. Significance Determinatio�: No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 50 Less than 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: s;��eot Potentially R'ith Less Than Significant Mitigation SigniScant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Induce substantial population growth in an azea, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or � � � � indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrasixucture? (b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating � � � � the construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? (c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the � � � � construction of re lacement housin 'elsewhere? Environmental Setting According to the California Department of Finance, the City of Orange's estimated population for 2018 is approximately 141,952 and is expected to grow to 151,400 by 2035.3s,36 �mpact Anal,Lsis a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for ezample, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? The project would update the City's Billboard Ordinance to include a provision for a Relocation Agreement that would allow a billboard company to convert an existing traditional billboard located within the City's Freeway Corridor to digital in exchange for removing another billboard face. The proposed project does not involve the construction of homes or the extension of infrastructure. Therefore, the project would not induce population growth directly or indirectly. There would be no impact. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not displace any existing housing. Therefore, the proposed upgrades and removals would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact 3s 2018. E-1 Cities,Counties,and the 5tate Population Estimates with Annual Peccent Change—January 1,2017 and 2018. August 10. Website:http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/DemographicsBsrimates/E-1/. � 2018. 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by 7urisdicrion. Website: http://www.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2016_2040RTPSCS_FinalGrowthForecastbyJurisdiction.pdf: AccessedAugust 10. 51 Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not displace any people. Therefore, the proposed upgrades and removals would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact 52 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the YO�BCI: Less than P J s,�s��r PotenHaRy With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob'ectives for an of the ublic services: i Fire Protection? ❑ ❑ � ❑ ii Police Protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ � iri Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ � iv Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ � v Other ublic facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ � Environmental Settin� Fire service for the City is provided by the Orange Fire Deparhnent (OFD). Law enforcement services for the City are provided by the Orange Police Deparhnent(OPD).37 Im,pact Analysis: (a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: - i) Fire Protection LED billboards present a potential fire hazard due to the thermal energy generated by LED illumination.38 LED lights maintain a relatively low temperature and produce much less heat than traditional bulbs (i.e. compact fluorescent lamp or incandescent bulbs). Furthermore, the upgraded billboard faces would be constructed in conformance with current codes (i.e. California Building Code, California Electrical Code, and the California Fire Code) that would prevent potential fires. The proposed project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, does not involve the construction of homes or the extension of infrastructure. As such, the project would not increase the population and thus would not result in the need for new or expanded fire protection facilities. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 37 City of Orange General Plan. 2010. Public Safety. Website:https://www.cilyoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/573/Public-Safety-PDF. August 15,2018. 38 Underwriters Laboratories. 2009. LED Signs and Luminaries. Website:https://www.ul.com/wp- contenUuploads/2014/04/ul LEDSignsLuminauesl.pdf. Accessed October 3,2018. 53 ii) Police Protection? The proposed project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not increase the population and thus would not result in an increased demand for police protection. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact iii) Schools? The proposed project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not increase the population and thus would not result in an increased demand for school facilities. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact iv) Parks? The proposed project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not result in an increase in population or an increase in demand for existing parks and recreational facilities. Therefore, this project would not necessitate the construction of new parks and recreational facilities. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact v) Other Public Facilities? The proposed project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not result in an increase in population or an increase in demand for other public facilities. Therefore, this project would not necessitate the construction of new public facilities. No impact would occur. 5ignificance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 54 15. RECREATION. Would the YO�2Ct: Less than P 1 s�guir,cenr PotenHally With Less Than Signi£cant Mitigation Sig 'nil'icant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that � � � � substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which ❑ ❑ ❑ � might have an adverse hysical effect on the environment? Environmental Setting The billboards are located in urbanized environments that include neighborhood and local parks. Imnact Anal,�is a) Would the project increase the use of egisting neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not generate new residents that could increase the demand and use of nearby parks or recreational facilities. Therefore, the project would not result in any physical deterioration of recreational facilities. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The project, which would allow for billboard upgrades and removals in the City of Orange, would not generate new residents that could increase the demand and use of nearby parks or recreational facilities. Therefore, construction or expansion of recreational facilities would not be required. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 55 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the YO�2Ct: Less than P J s��snt Potentially R'ith Less Than Signi�icant Mitigation SiguiScant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Conflict with an applicable plan,ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system,taldng into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components ❑ ❑ ❑ � of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle aths,and mass transit? (b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including,but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county ❑ ❑ � ❑ congestion management agency for designated roads or hi hwa s? (c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in ❑ ❑ ❑ � substantial safe risks? (d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., ❑ � ❑ ❑ fann e ui ment? e Result in inade uate emer enc access? ❑ ❑ � ❑ (fl Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise � � � � decrease the performance or safety of such facilities supporting alternative trans ortation e. .,bus hunouts,bic cle racks ? Environanental Setting The project sites are within urban areas that are traversed by several roadways and major highways, including SR-91, SR-55, SR-57, SR-22, and I-5. Impact Analvsis a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, includimg but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways,pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? - Construction-related traffic, including truck and constntction worker trips, would be minimal and would not substantially affect traffic conditions during the short duration of project construction required for the upgrades and removal of the existing billboards. The crane used for the upgrades and removals of billboards would be staged on the properties the billboards are situated on and would not occur within the public right-of-way (ROVV�. Construction related to the upgrades and removals of the billboards would not disrupt traffic because of street closures. Because these upgraded billboards would not require manual change of images like the static billboards require, it is anticipated these maintenance trips would be lesser in frequency and duration than the trips necessary to service the existing billboards. These trips would occur only as needed (less than once per month and likely only one 56 vehicle). Therefore, in aggregate, maintenance trips would likely be less. Therefore, the project would not increase traffic congestion on the surrounding roadways or freeways, or affect level of service standards at nearby intersections. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including,but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? As described in the Project Description, construction at each upgrade location would involve minimal activities and would last approximately five days in total. Construction activities would include removing the existing copy of the existing billboard, removing the existing billboard sections, and removing the metal pieces that attach the sign to the top of the billboard structure, which would take approximately two to three days. Once the existing static faces of the billboard is removed, a stinger package would be installed which would take approximately one day followed by the installation of the LED faces and illumination of the sign that would take approximately two days. For removal, hand tools and small crane rigs would be used, and it would take approximately one to two working days to remove each of the existing billboard structures. Therefore, construction (associated with the sign face upgrades) and demolition activities (associated with billboard removal) would involve negligible traffic, generated largely during off-peak hours, and is not expected to affect traffic congestion on an individual or cumulative basis. Because the upgraded billboards would not require manual change of images like the static billboards require, it is anticipated these maintenance trips would be lesser in frequency and duration than the trips necessary to service the existing billboards. These trips would occur only as needed (less than once per month and likely only one vehicle). Therefore, in aggregate, maintenance trips would likely be less. These trips occur only as needed (less than once per month and likely only one vehicle). As such, impacts on traffic congestion and other City standards would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? The two closest airports to the project site are John Wayne International Airport and Fullerton Municipal Airport. John Wayne International Airport is over 7.5 miles south, and the 57 Fullerton Municipal Airport is over 7.5 miles northwest of the nearest retained billboard location (Billboard Location 4). This condition precludes potential safety hazards to pilots and air traffic controllers. There would be no impact. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e. g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm equipment)? The project does not involve the construction of any new signs; only the replacement of existing signs on existing pole-mounted structures. Therefore, the upgraded billboards would not change roadway design and would not increase hazards due to sharp curves or dangerous intersections. Impact 1(d) addresses the potential for LED upgrades to distract drivers. As discussed in Impact 1(d), California law, OAAA recommendations, and FHWA standards require billboards to have a minimum dwell time of no less than four seconds. The Updated Billboard Ordinance requires a minimum of eight seconds of dwell time. Therefore, implementation of the Billboard Ordinance Update would ensure that any billboard converted to LED pursuant to the Ordinance would exceed the relevant State and federal requirements of minimum dwell time, and would therefore avoid any hazards related to driver distraction. In addition, the implementation of MM AES-2 would turn off the display or turn it black in the event of malfunction or failure. MM AES-3 would require the City of Orange to review and approve the signs operational lighting parameters to ensure compliance with State codes. With compliance with the requirements in the proposed Ordinance and the implementation of MM AES-2 and MM-AES-3, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM AES-2 and MM AES-3 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact e) Result in inadequate emergency access? The project does not involve the construction of any new signs; only the replacement of existing signs on existing pole-mounted structures. The existing signs do not interfere with traffic access or evacuation during an emergency, and the replacement signs would not materially change the existing condition in regards to emergency access. The crane used for the upgrades and removals of billboards would be staged on the properties the billboards are situated on and would not occur within public ROW and not disrupt traffic because of street closures. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact 58 Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact � Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities supporting alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? The project does not involve the construction of any new billboard signs; only the upgrade of e�cisting static billboard signs with LED signs on existing pole-mounted structures. The existing billboards do not interfere with public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, and the updated billboard faces would not materially change the existing condition in regards to access and use of these facilities. The crane used for the upgrades and removals of billboards would be staged on the properties the billboards are situated on and would not occur within public ROW and would not disrupt access to or use of these facilities. Therefore, the project would not conflict with public transit,bicycle, or pedestrian policies. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 59 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the signifccance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site,feature,place, cultural landscape Less than that is geographically de�ned in terms of the size and scope of s��aot the landscape,sacred place, or object with cultural value to a Potentially w�cn Less Than Significant Mitigation SigniScant No Cali ornia Native American Tribe, and that is: im a�c in�o orated �, e�t � a�t (a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources,or in a local register of historical resources ❑ ❑ ❑ � as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1 (b) A resource deternuned by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision ❑ ❑ ❑ � (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe. �mpact Anal,Ysis Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? The Billboard Ordinance Update would allow the faces of pre-existing static billboards to be replaced with LED faces. This conversion would not require ground disturbance. In addition, for the removal sites, only the above-grade portion of the billboard structures would be removed and billboard removal would not require ground disturbance. As such, the project would not introduce new impacts on any existing tribal cultural resources. Therefore, no impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact 60 b) A resource determined by the lead agency,in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe. Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) established a formal consultation process for California Native American tribes to identify potential significant impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074, as part of CEQA. As specified in AB 52, lead agencies must provide notice to tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a project if the tribe has submitted a written request to be notified. The City received a written request for such notification from three tribes who might have knowledge of the religious and/or cultural significance of resources that may be in and near the project sites. On October 9, 2018, the City mailed notices to the Sam Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, the Torrez Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation, providing a 30-day period in which any of the three tribes could request consultation with the City concerning tribal cultural resouces that may be impacted by the project. One tribe, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation, initially requested consultation, but after being informed the project would not involve ground disturbance, rescinded the request for consultation. As of the time of the writing of this document,no other tribes have requested consultation.39 Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact 39 Ashely Brodkin,Associate Planner,City of Orange. Personal communication:email. October 17,2018. 61 18. UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS Less than signiscant Would the project: roeene�auy With Less Than SigniTcant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable � � � � Regional Water Quali Control Board? (b) Require or result in the conshucrion of new water or wastewater treatment or collection faciliries or expansion of e�cisting � � � � facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ � which could cause si 'ficant environmental effects? (d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded ❑ ❑ ❑ � entitlements needed? (e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate � � � � capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the rovider's existin commitments? (fl Be served by a landfill with insufficient pernutted capacity to � � � • � accommodate the ro'ect's solid waste dis osal needs? (g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations � � � � related to solid wastes? (h) Have significant effects on energy resources as described in � � � � A endix F of the State CEQA Guidelines? Environmental Setting The City of Orange provides wastewater services and the City utilizes the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) for regional collection and treatment of sewage. The City of Orange provides water service to most of the City and the water used to serve the City's residents is made up of imported water purchased from the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and groundwater. The three landfills in Orange County—Olinda Alpha in Brea, the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, and the Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano—serve the project area. Orange County Waste and Recycling owns and operates these landfills.40 The project sites may contain water or wastewater infrastructure to support uses on each of the sites. None of the existing billboards generate demand for water supply, wastewater collection, or solid disposal. Im�act Analysis a) Egceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? The City of Orange provides wastewater services and the City utilizes the OCSD for regional collection and treatment of sewage within the project area. The project would not construct 40 City of Orange General Plan. 2010. Infrastructure. Website:https://wtvw.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter�ew/568/Infrastcucture- PDF. AccessedAugust 15,2018. 62 habitable structures. In addition, it would not generate significant employxnent, as no additional employees would be required to maintain the signs over the maintenance workers required for the existing signs. Therefore, the project would not generate demand for wastewater services, and, no impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment or.collection facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The project would not construct habitable structures. In addition, it would not generate significant employment, as no additional employees would be required to maintain the signs over the maintenance workers required for the existing signs. Therefore, the project would not generate demand for wastewater services, and,no impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ' As described in Impact 9(e), the project would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces. Therefore, the project would not increase stormwater runoff from the site and the existing stormwater system would not be impacted. No impact would occur. Significance Determination:No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? The project would not construct habitable structures. In addition, it would not generate significant employment, as no additional employees would be required to maintain the signs over the maintenance workers required for the existing signs. Therefore, the project would not generate demand for water and there would be no impact on water supplies and existing entitlements and resources. Significance Determination:No Impact 63 Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: No Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's ezisting commitments? The project would not construct habitable structures, In addition, it would not generate significant employment, as no additional employees would be required to maintain the signs over the maintenance workers required for the existing signs. Therefore, the project would not generate demand for wastewater services and it would not require the construction of wastewater treatment facilities or new expansion of existing facilities. No impact would occur. Significance Determination: No Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation:No Impact � Be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? The removal of traditional billboard faces and structures and upgrade of traditional faces would generate some waste materials that would be disposed of at landfills that accept demolition waste from contractors. Assembly Bill (AB) 939, the Integrated Waste Management Act, requires a 50 percent of diversion of solid waste from landfills. Orange County Waste and Recycling requires 65 percent diversion for construction and demolition projects. As stated on Orange County Waste and Recycling website, "applicants can achieve diversion through reuse, recycling; and/or composting of construction and demolition materials at County-approved facilities or use of a County franchised Waste Hauler."41 This policy is more stringent than AB 939, and, therefore, through compliance with Orange County Waste and Recycling requirements, the project would comply with AB 939. There are three landfills in Orange County that could accept solid waste from the project: Olinda Alpha in Brea, the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, and the Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano. The landfill capacities are provided in Table 4. 41 Orange County Waste and Recycling. 2018. Construction&Demolition(C&D)Program. Website: http://media.ocgov.com/gov/waste/recycling/cnd�rogram.asp. Accessed October 5,2018. 64 Table 4: Orange County Landfill Summary . . . ,,, � . ` .Cubic 1'ard`s r . , . ,. , , � _ �. . .,. � . _.. a��= --... _ , : ,� " °' Manmum Daily - : ',�,; : ' ' Facility f ,Location• ` ° Throughput ,' Permitted Gapacity. � ' Remaining Capacity Olinda Alpha Brea 8,000 tons/day 148.8 million cubic 34.2 million cubic yards yards Frank R.Bowerman Irvine 11,500 tons/day 266 million cubic 205 million cubic yards yards Prima Deshecha San Juan 4,000 tons/day 172.9 million cubic 87.4 million cubic Capistrano yards yards Source:Cal Recycle,2018. The three landfills have a total remaining capacity of approximately 326.6 million cubic yards. Using a conservative estimate, the largest billboard face is 20 feet by 60 feet (height by width) with a depth of 6 feet, and removal of each billboard face would generate approximately 267 cubic yards of solid waste.42 Therefore, each removal and upgrade would generate significantly less than one percent43 of existing landfill capacity. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid wastes? Solid waste disposal would follow the requirements of the franchised waste hauler, which must adhere to federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to the collection of solid waste. The project would comply with all State and local waste diversion requirements. The project would be consistent with policies and actions stated in the City of Orange General Plan Infrastructure Element. As such, impacts would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact h) Have significant effects on energy resources as described in Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines? Existing energy uses for the static billboards includes lighting used to illuminate the billboards at night. 42 Volume in cubic yazds=feet�/27 43 0.000046 percent 65 The project would result in a commihnent of additional resources and energy during construction and operation. The upgrade from traditional billboards to LED digital billboards would require the use of nonrenewable construction material, such as concrete, metals, and plastics. Nonrenewable resources and energy would also be consumed during the manufacturing and transportation, and construction of the signs. The scope of construction activities, however, is minimal with removal activities occurring within one to two working days at each existing billboard structure. Large amounts of energy would not be expended, and all construction vehicles would comply with federal and State standards for on- and off- road vehicles (e.g., emission standards set by the California Air Resources Board), meaning wasteful usage of energy would not occur. Constxuction-related impacts would therefore be less than significant. Energy usage for the existing billboards includes the nighttime lighting used to illuminate the billboards faces at night. Digital billboards are comprised of LEDs, power supplies, cooling systems, lighting controls, and a computer, with LEDs being the largest portion of the energy consumption, particularly during peak demand times when ambient lighting from sunlight is the brightest.44 The annual energy use of a digital billboard can range from 50 to 320 MWh.4s Digital billboards produced in recent years require significantly less energy (between 50 to 70 percent less, in some cases) than those produced several years ago 46 In addition, energy savings can come from the use of high quality LEDs and tighter brightness control settings, resulting in up to 85 percent reduction in power usage. The operational parameters of the project (i.e., 0.3 foot-candle at 250 feet) would mean that the signs would always operate at one-sixth of the maximum brightness level for LED billboards, as set forth by California State Law,47 resulting in efficient energy consumption. Moreover, the LED lighting used in the proposed LED billboards would meet Title 24 requirements for energy efficiency. Electricity would be provided by Southern California Edison, which obtains its energy supplies from power plants and natural gas fields in Southern California, as well as from energy purchased outside its service area and delivered through high voltage transmission lines and pipelines. Power is generated from various sources, including fossil fuel, hydroelectric, nuclear, wind, and geothermal plants; and is fed into the electrical grid system serving Southern California. Southern California Edison is subject to California's Renewables Portfolio Standard, which was established in 2002 under Senate Bill 1078, accelerated in 2006 under Senate Bill 107, and expanded in 2011 under Senate Bill 2. This program requires investor-owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 33 percent of total procurement by 2020. According to the CPUC, Southern California Edison provided 4° Energy Solutions. 2014. Digital Billboard Energy Use in Califomia. Website:https://www.etcc-ca.com/sites/default/files/reports/etl 4sdg8011_digitalbillboardreport_2014-7.pdf. Accessed July 20,2018. 45 Young. 2010. Illuminating the Issues Digital Signage and Philadelphia's Green Future. Website:http://www.scenic.org/storage/ documentslDigital_Signage_Final_Dec_14 2010.pdf. Accessed 7uly 20,2018. 46 Energy Solutions. 2014. Digital Billboard Energy Use in Califomia. Website:https://www.etcc-ca.com/sites/defaulUfiles/reports/et 14sdg8011_digitalbillboardreport 2014-7.pdf. Accessed July 20,2018. 47 Business and Professions Code Section 5403(g),Vehicle Code Section 21466.5 66 28 percent of its retail electricity from renewable energy resources in 2016 48 As such, the project's electricity source is expected to be produced and utilized in an efficient manner. Energy,in the form of fossil fuels,would also be used to fuel vehicles traveling to and from the site to repair or maintain the signs. However, as described in Section 16, Transportation/Traffic, vehicle maintenance trips would be irregular(less than one per month), and the operation of the signs would not generate daily trips. Moreover, because billboards would be removed as part of the Billboard Ordinance Update, maintenance trips would be expected to be less frequent than those associated with maintenance of the existing billboards. With respect to lifecycle emissions, although there is no regulatory defmition for "lifecycle emissions," the term is generally used to refer to all emissions associated with the creation and existence of a project; including emissions from the manufacture and transportation of component materials, and even emissions from the manufacture of the machines required to produce those materials. However, since it is impossible to accurately estimate the entire chain of emissions associated with any given project, lifecycle analyses are limited in effectiveness and meaning (relative to assessing or reducing Project-specific emissions for the CEQA analysis). The California Natural Resources Agency has stated that lifecycle analyses are not required under CEQA. The project would not encourage activities that result in the use of large amounts of energy, or use of energy in a wasteful manner. Therefore, operational impacts with regard to use of energy would have a less than significant impact. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Measures:No Mitigation is Required Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 48 CPUC. 2018. Current Renewable Procurement Status. Website:http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/RPS_Homepage/. Accessed July 20,2018. 67 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Less tLan s��uir�eac Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation SigniScant No Im act Inco orated Im act Im act (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ❑ � ❑ ❑ community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a raze or endangered plant or animal or eliininate important examples of the ma'or eriods of California histo or rehisto ? (b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumularively considerable? ("G�mulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when � � � � viewed in connection with the e$'ects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future rojects7 (c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or ❑ � ❑ ❑ indirectl ? Impact Analvsis a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining level's, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of-the major periods of California history or prehistory? As described in Section 4, Biological Resources, the project would not result in significant environmental impacts to wildlife or plant species. There are no lrnown special-status species on the upgrade or removal sites, though this analysis provides for mitigation in the event that construction activities take place during bird nesting season. As described in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the project does not include ground disturbance, which precludes impacts to cultural resources. Therefore, with implementation of MM BIO-1, the project would not degrade the quality of the environment at a project- or cumulative-level in terms of biological or cultural resources. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM BIO-1 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact 68 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) Operation of the project would involve the display of inessages on electronic billboards near SR-55 and SR-57 corridors. Operation entails no new noise production, minimal maintenance traffic, and negligible GHG emissions. Appendix D contains a list of the City of Orange's pending land use applicants as of September 27, 2018. Some of the projects listed in the table are within the vicinity of the upgrade locations. The project's lighting would have the potential to have cumulative impacts in conjunction with the other reasonably foreseeable projects listed in Appendix D within the vicinity of the upgrade locations. The SR-55 and SR-77 corridors are within urban settings with other existing nighttime lighting including car headlights, parking lot lighting, streetlights, security lighting on buildings, and internal lights in buildings. In addition, the existing billboards are illuminated at night, which produces nighttime lighting. The LED faces would operate at a maximum of 0.3 foot-candle at 250 feet in compliance with the Billboard Ordinance Update. Therefore, the LED faces would have one-sixth of the maximum brightness level for LED billboards, as set forth by the Outdoor Advertising Act, which is a California State Law and would result in a nominal increase in the existing lighting footprint. Moreover, the brightness of the LED sign faces would be dimmable to reflect ambient light conditions. Therefore, the nighttime lighting produced by the LED faces in combination with the lighting for other reasonably foreseeably projects would not result in a cumulatively significant impact. With respect to electricity usage,the LED lighting used in the LED faces would meet Title 24 requirements for energy e�ciency. While the signs electricity usage is associated with off- site emissions where power is generated, the IS/MND analysis of GHGs demonstrates the project falls well below applicable SCAQMD thresholds, which account for cumulative impacts of climate change. Therefore, because of the project's size and utilization of energy eff'icient lighting, it would not make a cumulatively considerable contribution to cumulative GHG emissions or result in an overall impact to local and regional levels of GHG emissions. With respect to construction, the construction activities necessary to upgrade the traditional billboards to digital LED billboards and remove existing billboards requires very little equipment and would occur within one to two days at each billboard location. However, as detailed in this IS/MND, there are potential impacts related to aesthetics, biological resources, hazardous materials, noise, and transportation/traffic. The project would incorporate MM AES-1,MM AES-2, MM AES-3 (implemented for both aesthetics impacts and impacts related to transportation and traffic), MM BIO-1, MM HAZ-1, and MM NOI-1. These mitigation measures ensure not only that the project,individually,would not have a significant impact,but that it would not make a considerable contribution to any cumulative impact. 69 Signi£cance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM AES-1,MM AES-2,MM AES-3, MM BIO-1,MM HAZ-1, and MM NOI-1 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The City of Orange Municipal Code (Billboard Ordinance, Municipal Code Title 5—Chapter 5.62, Signs and Billboards) does not currently allow the construction and operation of digital billboards within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. The City of Orange is currently updating the Municipal Code to allow for digital billboards within City limits. If adopted, the updated Code would allow similar upgrades of other billboards from traditional format to digital format. The removal of billboard structures would improve aesthetics/visual quality. The project would include MM AES-1, MM AES-2 and MM AES-3 to minimize light and glare and traffic hazards for vehicle drivers along SR-55 and SR-57. The project also would not make sizable contributions to traffic or substantially change land uses. In addition, the project would not affect public services, utilities, recreation, or population/housing balance. With implementation of MM HAZ-1 as discussed in Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the project would also not expose human beings to significant risks related to hazards/hazardous materials. With implementation of MM NOI-1, the project would not contribute to a significant impact with respect to noise. Therefore,with implementation of MM AES-1, MM AES-2, MM AES-3, MM HAZ-1, and MM NOI-1, the project would not cause direct or indirect substantial adverse effects on human beings in tertns of aesthetics/light-glare, air quality, geology/soils, traffic/traffic safety, noise, land use, public services, utilities, recreation, population/housing, hydrology, water quality, or hazards/hazardous materials. As such, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures: MM AES-1,MM AES-2,MM AES-3,MM HAZ-1, and MM NOI-1 Significance Determination After Mitigation: Less'Than Significant Impact 70 20. References 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction. 2018. Website: http://www.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2016_2040RTPSCS FinalGrowthForecastbyJurisdict ion.pdf. Accessed August 10. ARB 2008. Initial AB32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Document. Website: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/scopingplandocument.htm. California Department of Transportation. 2012. Caltrans Division of Research and Innovation, Effects of Outdoor Advertising Displays on Driver Safety,p.9. October 11. California Department of Transportation. 2014. Outdoor Advertising Act and Regulations 2014 Edition. California Business Professional Code § 5200—§5486. California Deparhnent of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping 5ystem. Website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm. Accessed August 2018. California Geographical Survey. 1998. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Orange Quadrangle. Website: http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHI'/EZRIM/Maps/ORANGE EZRIM.pdf. Accessed August 2018. California Geographical Survey. 1998. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Orange Quadrangle. Website: http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Maps/ANAHEIM EZRIlVI.pdf. Accessed August 2018. California Geological Survey. 1998. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Orange Quadrangle. Website: http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Maps/ORANGE EZRIM.pdf. California State Law. Business and Professions Code Section 5403(g). Website: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=BPC&division =3.&title=&part=&chapter=2.&article=7. California State Law. Vehicle Code Section 21466.5. Website: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/aces/codes_displayText.xhhnl?lawCode=VEH&division= 11.&title=&parr&chapte�2.&article=3. California Stormwater Quality Association. 2013. Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook. January. Website: https://www.casqa.org/sites/default/filesBMPHandbooks/ BMP NewDevRedev Complete.pdf. Accessed October 3,2018. Ciiy of Orange General Plan. 2010. Infrastructure. Website: https://www.cityoforange.org/ DocumentCenter/View/568/Infrastructure-PDF. Accessed August 15, 2018. City of Orange General Plan. 2010. Public Safety. Website: https://www.cityoforange.org/ DocumentCenter/View/573/Public-Safety-PDF. Accessed August 15, 2018 71 , City of Orange. 2018. Ordinance No. 01-18. Conservation Plans By Species. 2015. Website: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?Docu mentID=108719&inline. CPUC. 2018. Current Renewable Procurement Status. Website: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/RPS_ Homepage/. Accessed July 20,2018. Deparhnent of Conservation. 2004. Agricultural Preserves 2004. Website: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/Orange_WA_03_04.pdf. Accessed August 2018. Deparhnent of Conservation. 2014. Orange County Important Farmland. August 10. Website: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2014/ora 14.pdf. E-1 Cities, Counties, and the State Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change—January 1, 2017 and 2018. 2018. Website: http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/ Estimates/E-1/. AccessedAugust 10, 2018. Energy Solutions. 2014. Digital Billboard Energy Use in California. Website: https://www.etcc- ca.com/sites/default/files/reports/etl 4sdg8011_digitalbillboardreport 2014-7.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2018. Energy Solutions. 2014. Digital Billboard Energy Use in California. Website: https://www.etcc- ca.com/sites/default/files/reports/et 14sdg8011_digitalbillboardreport_2014-7.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2018. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2006. Highway Construction Noise Handbook, August. MWDOC. 2014. Annual Rainfall in Orange County, CA. Website: https://www.mwdoc.com/ wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Rainfall-1970-2014.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2018. Oliver Milman. The Guardian. 2016. FAA aims to save millions of birds by changing static red airport lights. March. Website: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/24/ airport-lights-birds-faa. Accessed October 4, 2018. Orange County General Plan. 2005. Resources Element. Website: https://www.ocgov.com/civic ax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=40235. Accessed August 2018. Orange General Plan. 2010. Program Environmental Impact Report. Website: https:l/www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/5 84/General-Plan-Environmental- Imp act-Report-EIR-PDF. State Water Resources Control Board. 2015. GeoTracker. Website: https://geotracker.water boards.ca.gov/profile report.asp?global_id=T0605910783. AccessedAugust 16, 2018. Summary of Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs). Website: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=15329&inline. 72 U.S. Dept. of Transportation. 2007. Fed. Highway Admin., Guidarice On Off-Premise Changeable Message Signs,p.2. September 25. Underwriters Laboratories. 2009. LED Signs and Luminaries. Website: https://www.ul.com/wp-contenduploads/2014/04/ul LEDSignsLuminairesl.pdf. Accessed October 3, 2018. Young. 2010. Illuminating the Issues Digital Signage and Philadelphia's Green Future. Website: http://www.scenic.org/storage/documents/Digital_Signage_Final_Dec_14_ 2010.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2018. 73 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.1860-18 PROJECT NAME:Billboard Ordinance Update Project PROJECT LOCATION:Various sites throughout the City of Orange PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The City is proposing to repeal and delete Chapter 5.62,Signs and Billboards,in its entirety,and to amend Title 17,Chapter 17.36 Sign Regulations to add a new Section 17.36.1 SO that would provide guidance for the conversion of an existing static billboard display to a digital display,subject to the removal of other existing billboard faces on major arterial streets in the City or within the viewshed of the City. LEAD AGENCY:City of Orange CONTACT PERSONI TELEPHONE NO.:Ashley Brodkin,Associate Planner/(714)744-7238 APPLICANT:City of Orange CONTACT PERSON!TELEPHONE NO.:Ashley Brodkin,Associate Planner/(714)744-7238 � ' �'ime Frame � Tume Fr"ame and= �� °' �_t � �'enficahon of Comphance < � � �� and�Responsible Responsible , � �� No. 1VIitigahon Measure � � �- � F � � , ' x �� ; ' f _e ; . � Party for P ,for ; ,� � a�Y ' '�` � ` ' t,�Im lemenfahonk. § r�:Monitonn Imtials '. D'a"te , � .Rema"rks , , � � � _ - r; 4r �Aestliehcs � �,� �" 'w ��`'� MM To�ensure the lighting of signs does not TimeFrame: TimeNYame: , AES-1 exceed 0.3 foot-candle at 250 feet,prior to Prior to the During Minor Site conversion or relocation of any billboard,the commencement of Plan Review City shall require a site-specific lighting any proposed study to be submitted as part of the Minor actions(e.g., Site Plan Review. Should the results of the upgrade to s4udy indicate the maximum intensity of electronic light output produced by this billbdard billboard faces) would exceed 0.3 foot-candle at a distance of Responsible Responsible Party: 250 feet, design modifications shall be Party:Project City of Orange incorporated into the billboard design to Applicant Community comply with this regulation. Development Department staff Mi6gation Monitonng ReporF Page 1 Time Frame Time Frame and' "�` �Ver�ficahon of Comphance;; °` ` � , �� ` 't and Responsible °°Responsible 2= , * f � No.= Mittgation Measure •� � � Party for z*:` Partyfor Im letnenta�on _=:�'dVIonitonn ,,,, :.,Imtials Date ;�, Remarks ., MM The plans for the LED billboard to be Time Frame: Time Frame: AES-2 approved by the City as part of the Minor Prior to the During Minor Site Site Plan Review shall include an operating commencement of Plan Review mechanism (hazdware or soflware any proposed controlled)that huns off the display or huvs acrions(e.g., it to all black in the event of a malfunction or upgrade to failure in any system or subsystem that electronic results in the display wholly or partly billboard faces) appearing to flash. Responsible Responsible Party: Party:Project City of Orange Applicant and Community Construction Development Contractor De artment staff MM The signs' operational lighring parameters Time Frame: Time Frame: AES-3 shall be provided to the City of Orange Prior to the During Minor Site Community Development Department for commencement of Plan Review review and approval prior to regular any proposed operation of the LED billboard as part of the actions(e.g., Minor Site Plan Review, and shall be upgrade to implemented by the project proponent to electronic ensure no residents or drivers will be billboazd faces) adversely affected or impacted by trespass Responsible Responsible Party: glare lighting. Party:Project City of Orange Applicant Community Development • De adment staff >A riculfural;Resour"ces"',. �" a•,�xn_. r �. h:' None . <_ � �_ � ; r Air �iiah �� `� �, r,_s . ° .� �, w+�� . ,, _ a.t .,.,.u, .., � ,.. a, . .��v. _. _ ,u_� ,_� ,�.> None Mitigalion Monitoring Repo�t-Page 2 _ .. .. . .. . ' ' Time Frame . rTime E'rame aridq ~ Ver�cation of Compliance and;:Responsible Responsible No:: 1VIingatton:Measur.e � �;party'<for , P,arfy for � " �... . . , � :,,,. . �, , Iui lementahon - �: 1VIonitorin , � :.Initials Date ; ' .Remarks Biolo"cal;Resources = _ " : ; ,."_ - . . � -. , , .. MM In the event that billboazd removal should Time Frame: Time Frame: BIO-1 occur between September 1 and January 31, Prior to the Throughout the the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified commencement of duration of any biologist to conduct pre-construction any proposed proposed actions surveys for nesting birds to ensure that no actions(e.g., (e.g.,upgrade to nests will be disturbed during project upgrade to electronic billboazd implementation. This survey shall be electronic faces) completed no more than three(3)days prior billboazd faces) to the initiarion of demolirion activities during the during nesting season. During this survey, breeding/nesting the biologist will inspect all billboards and season(September other possible nesring habitats immediately 1 to January 31) adjacent to the demolition areas for nests. If Responsible Responsible Party: an acrive nest is found sufficiently close to party:Project City of Orange work areas to be disturbed by demolition,the Applicant, Community biologist,in consultarion with the Califomia giologist,and Development Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFV�, Construction Department staff will determine the extent of a demolition- Contractor free buffer zone to be established azound the nest,typically 250 feet,to ensure that raptor or migratory bird nests will not be disturbed during project demolition. Prior to the commencement of�construcrion activiries and the issuance of any permits,the City of Orange Community Development Department shall verify that all project construction plans include specific notes regarding the requirements of the MBTA, that preconstrucrion surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers(if needed) are noted on the lans. Mitigation Moniforing Report-Page 3 � - ' � ' `'� � :Time Frame, ; ,Time•Frame and;, :'' ,Verification',of Compliance . No: 1VIingation-,Measure and'Respons�ble `Responsible . � Party`for :Party for Iui lementatton ��1VIonitonn :`: .Inifials, ,Dafe � '�`'•Remarks� . : .. Cultiiral Resources - ' " � -_:�� _ None Geolo and Soils . "'` ;. . - . . _,.. _� _„ � __ .. � _ _. .. . � �_ None �Greeuhouse`Gas Etni's`sions.:a�� ' � `�v` ` s ' `'�° � ' , ; v� n, , , _ � �. �•� ,�:. . P�.-. s. . „ _ , a,�,� , - ... . . o�.� a , -= - , . - , _. .. _ . . , . . . .. None , _ .. ,, - .� �.: , .� . . .- 'Hazards and Hazardous MateriaLs ` - ` - . ,. . _ . _ . ._ � . � MM The following measures shall be Time Frame: Time Frame:Prior HAZ-1 implemented during billboazd removal Prior to and during to and during activities: billboazd removal billboazd removal • In conformance with State and local laws, acrivities acriviries including California Health and Safety Responsible Responsible Party: Code secrion 19827.5,a visual inspection party:Project City of Orange and possible sampling shall be completed Applicant and Community prior to the removal of the billboazd Construction Development structures to determine the presence of Contractor Department asbestos, lead-based paint, or other Building Inspector hazardous building materials. • If this assessment finds presence of such materials,the project applicant shall create and implement a health and safety plan to ensure workers aze not exposed to contaminants in excess of OSHA and other applicable State and federal standazds and associated risks associated with hazardous materials during demolition,renovarion of affected struchues,transport,and disposal. • During billboard removal activities, all materials containing lead-based paint shall be removed in accordance with Cal OSHA Lcad in Construction Standazd, Title 8, CCR 1532.1,including employee training, em lo ee air monitorin and dust control. Mifigation Monitoring Report-Page 4 ,. ;..,�. .. , � ; � . � � � � � ,' �• � Time Frame �� Time Frame and`� � Veizficahon of CompLance�� and�Responsible " ;Responsible " � � - . _No:� � • , Mingation:Measure � � � , . _ . , , Partyfor Paity.for . �Im'1e�rientahon ,_' ; . .� , .._ ; . ,:, .. ..,�._,�,,_ � .. _.�_� .._ �_Moni'tonu �; ,Inihals Date, ° ,""s'Rema`r•l�s. __ • During billboard�removalwacrivities, all materials containing asbestos and/or lead- based paint shall be handled and removed by qualified professionals in accordance with applicable regularions, including SCAQMD Regulation XN, Rule 1403; Title 22, Califomia Code of Regulations, Secrion 66261.24;Title 8,Califomia Code of Regulations,Section 1532.1. • Any debris or soil containing asbestos lead- based paint or coatings shall be disposed of at landfills that meet acceptance criteria for the waste bein dis osed. _ .v- , _ . _ . � , ..- , :�., , � -. ..r . A drolo $nd Water Quali . . , . �, . .,.. , , ., _ _ None Larid Use/Plamm� ... , ; .�. ., ., . , , . . � . None '1VIineral Resou� � � � �' �_ � � � � , , �� o rces� - , . r _ . - , None _ _ ,. ,� _ . .� _. . , 'Noise �� , .� .. � :.�. � . . < . MM To reduce potential construction noise 'Iyme Frame: Time Frame: NOI-1 impacts, the following multi-part mirigarion Throughout Thmughout measure shall be implemented for the project: billboazd upgrade billboard upgrade • The conshucrion contractor shall ensure acriviries activities that all internal combusrion engine-driven Responsible Responsible Party: equipment is equipped with mufIlers that party:Project City of Orange are in good condition and appropriate for Applicant and Community the equipment. Construction Developmcnt • The construction contractor shall locate Contractor Deparhnent staff starionary noise-generating equipment as faz as possiblc from sensifive receptois when sensitive receptors adjoin or aze neaz a construction pro'ect area. In addirion,the MiOgation Monitoring Report-Page 5 ' = � : . ; ` �; �`° Time.Frame Time Frame and'' ' �_ ._r z No: ; _" Mingation 1VIeasure ' and`Responsible ` Responsible • , , , . Veilficahon of Couiphance � , ., :'Party,for Party for . _____:.----_--�_..._.__a__`___.w.�:_.�-._-w--�._.._�._�'Im "lemeritatton °-;•Monifonn � Initials. . D'a4e : .: '.Remar"ks' " � project contractor shall place such stationary construcrion equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. • The conshucrion contractor shall prolubit unnecessary idling of intemal combusrion engines. • The construcrion conhactor shall, to the maximum extent pracrical, locate on-site equipment staging areas so as to maximize the distance between construcrion-related noise sources and noise-sensirive receptors neazest the project site during all project construction. ;�Po�ulaHon�anil,Housin . �.,.r �:� ;'�� ,�,' _ �_ " ,; . ,. ,. . , . , _ .. . �_.. None �P-,utilic Services - ��T - ��' � "�' � � � None ., ._ , _ , , . . . Recreahon . ,.:°: `, .._, ,=. _ �__. �.� . .� . ._,..., � . .___ _, .,: _ . ._; . ._ ., .,. . _�. ...,,- None . �. ,„< . ., . � . ., _ . � �� , -z. .., . . , 4. , Trans ortahon/.T"raffic.". `` � ` � ` � , ..� _. . . �. .. _ ... .. . .. r. .. . See MM AES-2 and MM AES-3 .. . ,_ Trib'al'Cultural Resources' � , .•' -�'e ,., , ...- . o. None Ufilities/5ervice S stems ' ` ., " ` None __ , . ,. , . ... , . Mandator Findin s;of3i nificance , ., .; .,�x - �;,:. .� ' a .�. ° �� '- . .-� � � � �� :, .,,�, _. � _. . . ,. . ,� _ Y„ � See MM AES-1,MM AES-2,MM AES-3, MM BIO-1,MM I3AZ-1,and MM NOI-1 Mitigation Monitoring Reporf-Page 6 Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 11-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1860-18, REPEALING AND DELETING CHAPTER 5.62 OF THE ORANGE MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE ORANGE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 17.36.180 REGULATING THE CONVERSION OF EXISTING BILLBOARDS ALONG FREEWAY CORRIDORS TO ELECTRONIC BILLBOARDS. WHEREAS, Section 5412 of the Outdoor Advertising Act (Bus. & Profs. Code, § 5200 et se� encourages local governments and owners of billboards to enter into relocation agreements, pursuant to which local governments can continue development in a planned manner without expenditure of public funds, while allowing the continued maintenance of private investment and a medium of public communication; and WHEREAS, the City's municipal code does not currently allow the construction and operation of a digital billboard within the City's jurisdictional boundaries through a relocation agreement, though California state law authorizes such, and the City municipal code would require the adoption of an ordinance amendment establishing standards that, pursuant to the provisions of the Orange Municipal Code, Minor Site Plan Review, and the terms of a relocation agreement, an outdoor advertising media company may rehabilitate and operate a digital billboard in place of an existing static billboard in exchange for the removal of existing billboards at other locations (the"ordinance amendment"); and WHEREAS, the City has entered into an agreement with Outfront Media, LLC, for the right to operate a digital billboard,wholly contingent upon the City adopting an ordinance that would regulate the conversion of the existing static billboard to a digital billboard; and WHEREAS, the City has not committed to any particular course of action by tentatively entering into the aforementioned agreement,but is making an effort to reduce visual blight within its jurisdictional boundaries and other nearby areas visible to the City's residents, by removing existing billboards on local roadways in exchange for allowing digital billboards along the freeway corridor; and WHEREAS, to the extent that the passage of the ordinance amendment would have any reasonably foreseeable,non-speculative environmental impacts,the ordinance amendment has been evaluated in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1860-18, prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), consistent with the findings in Section III below. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Title 5 is hereby amended to repeal and delete Chapter 5.62, Signs and Billboards, in its entirety. SECTION II: Title 17, Chapter 17.36 is hereby amended to add Section 17.36.180,which shall read as follows: 17.36.180 Billboards A. Prohibition. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code,except for the relocation of existing billboards pursuant to this section,no new billboards shall be constructed within the City limits. For purposes of this section, "relocation" includes the removal of a display and construction of a new display to substitute for the display removed, as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 5412. B. Relocation of Existing Billboards. An owner of an existing billboard located within the City may apply for a billboard relocation subject to the following procedure and criteria: 1. Process. An applicant for a billboard relocation shall file an application for Minor Site Plan Review approval with the City, pursuant to Orange Municipal Code Section 17.10.060. 2. Criteria. The Community Development Director shall apply the following criteria in making his determination on the site plan: a. The structure shall be constructed on two or less steel supports; b. The relocation site shall be at least 500 feet from any other existing billboard structure,and shall also comply with the distance requirements set forth in section E, if applicable; c. Except as otherwise provided in subsection F, the height of the top of the sign face shall not exceed 60 feet, as measured from finished grade; --.. d. The structure shall incorporate aesthetically pleasing architectural elements to the extent feasible so as to promote compatibility with surrounding properties; e. The applicant shall present proof of compliance with any applicable State or Federal law requirements relating to billboard signing and freeway location; f. The structure shall not result in a significant adverse aesthetic impact upon any surrounding residential neighborhoods or exceed the illumination thresholds set forth in this Section. ORD 11-18 2 GAS 3. Conditions of A�proval. The Community Development Director may require reasonable conditions of approval to protect the public health, welfare, and safety of the community 4. Findin�s. The Community Development Director shall make a finding in approving such a request that the constructio� of the structure and approval of the Minor Site Plan Review will not have an adverse effect on the public health, welfare, and safety of the community. C. Publicly Caused Billboard Relocations. Any proposal to relocate an existing billboard structure,which relocation is caused by a City or State proj ect,shall be subj ect to the Minor Site Plan Review process above. D. Electronic Billboards Within the Freeway Corridor. 1. For purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings: a. "Billboard"has the same meaning as those advertising displays defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 5202. b. "Electronic billboard" means an internally or externally illuminated billboard that utilizes digital message technology capable of instantaneously changing the static message or copy on the sign electronically. c. "Freeway Corridor" means the area within the City comprised of the land within 300 feet of either edge of the right of way of the following freeways: California lnterstate Highway 5; California State Route 22; California State Route 55; and California State Route 57. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, subject to the discretionary approval of a Minor Site Plan Review application above, entry into a relocation agreement with the City in accordance with Business and Professions Code Section 5412, and compliance with the additional requirements set forth below, the owner of an existing billboard within the City may convert a static copy billboard to an electronic billboard, provided such billboard is located within the Freeway Corridor, subject to approval of a Minor Site Plan Review application pursuant to section B. 3. In addition to such conditions as may be imposed pursuant to approval of a Minor Site Plan Review application for a billboard relocation pursuant to subsections B.3., above, electronic billboards shall be subject to the following criteria and conditions: a. An electronic billboard may only be located within the Freeway Corridor. b. Electronic billboards shall comply with all applicable location,distance, size,operational,permit or licensing,andlor other requirements or limits imposed by Federal, State or local law, including, without limitation, ORD 11-18 3 GAS the California Outdoor Advertising Act, California Business and Professions Code Section 5200 et seq., and its implementing regulations, including applicable amendments thereto. To the extent a conflict arises between any provisions of this section and applicable Federal, State or local law,unless otherwise preempted, local law shall control. c. Each sign face of an electronic billboard shall be oriented primarily for viewing from the Freeway Corridor and away from any residentially zoned property. d. No electronic billboard shall be located on or within 300 feet of any property zoned single-family residentially, as measured from the base of the structural support column of the electronic billboard to nearest property line. e. Each electronic billboard proposal must have undergone the proper level of environmental analysis required under the California Environmental Quality Act. E. No electronic billboard shall be located within 500 feet of any other billboard located on the same side of the freeway or within 1,000 feet of any other electronic billboard or on-premises electronic sign located on the same side of the freeway. F. The pernutted height of an electronic billboard shall be deternuned through the Minor Site Plan Review process and shall be limited to the maximum height necessary to ensure adequate visibility of the display from the Freeway Corridor,however in no event shall an electronic billboard exceed 60 feet in height, as measured from finished grade to the top of the billboard structure, or in the case of the conversion of an existing billboard, the height of the existing billboard, whichever is greater. G. The area of each electronic billboard sign face,including framing and trim,shall not exceed 680 square feet. H. Electronic billboaxd displays shall contain still or static messages or images only, and no part of the sign structure or image being displayed may move or present the appearance or optical illusion of movement,or include flashing,blinking,or txaveling lighting, the varying of light intensity, or any other means not providing constant illumination. Each static message or image shall be displayed for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive seconds before changing, and the transition or blank screen time between one display message and the next shall not exceed one second. I. The maximuxn intensity of light output produced by an electronic billboard display shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles above the ambient light level at any time,as measured using a foot-candle meter at a distance of 250 feet, and shall otherwise comply with section 5403(g) of the Outdoor Advertising Act and section 21466.5 of the California Vehicle Code. J. Electronic billboard owners and/or operators shall make space available for the display of emergency messaging in accordance with local,regional, and/or State protocols. ORD 11-18 4 GAS K. As a condition to approval of the relocation and/or conversion of a billboard to an electronic billboard, the owner of the electronic billboard shall execute a relocation agreement with the City pursuant to California Business and Professions Code Section 5412 on terms approved by the City Council in its sole and absolute discretion.At a minimum, such a relocation agreement shall: (i)require the permanent removal of a minimum of five existing billboard faces within the city or visible from a City street for each relocated electronic billboard consisting of two faces , (ii)provide for mitigation by the owner of aesthetic and/or other impacts caused by the electronic billboard(s), (iii)require the owner to comply with any and all required mitigation measures, conditions of approval, and applicable provisions of this section and this code, (iv)require notice to be mailed to all residential property owners located within 500 feet of the proposed electronic billboard installation, 14 days prior to City Council consideration of the relocation agreement; (v) provide for the payment by the owner of applicable fees and costs, (vi)require each owner to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City from any and all claims, lawsuits, awards and judgments, including any reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, that may arise from the approval of the relocation and/or conversion of a billboard to an electronic billboard and/or the removal of other existing billboards, pursuant to this section or any other provision of the code, subject to the terms of the agreement, (vii)require the owner(s)/operator(s)of the electronic billboard to donate up to 10%of the total advertising time on the electronic billboard to community events,as requested by the City Manager; and (viii) any other terms and conditions the City may find reasonable in approving said agreement, and consistent with applicable law. Nothing herein shall be construed to require the City to enter into such an agreement or to allow the relocation of an existing billboard or the conversion of an existing billboard to an electronic billboard. L. The owner of an electronic billboard authorized pursuant to this section may,at its sole option, remove the digital display from the billboard structure at any time, for any reason, and temporarily or permanently replace such digital display with state-of-the-art non- electronic static sign faces of the same or smaller dimensions. SECTION III: The City Council finds and determines as follows: Ordinance No. 11-18 was adequately described and evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1860- 18 to determine the level of environmental impacts associated with the proj ect that could result in: 1) the potential removal of existing billboard faces within the City of Orange; and, 2) potential upgrade of up to five existing static billboard signs to LED signs within the City of Orange. The analysis contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration(MND)determined that implementation of the project may result in potentially significant environmental effects without mitigation to the following environmental factors: Aesthetics, Biological Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, and Transportation/Traffic. Incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project results in a reduction of significant impacts to less than significant levels. ORD 11-18 5 GAS SECTION IV: If any section, subdivision,paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (or more) section, subdivision,paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION V: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk at least five(5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which this Ordinance is to be adopted. A suuunary of this Ordinance shall also be published once within fifteen (15) days after this Ordinance's passage in a newspaper of general circulation, published, and circulated in the City of Orange. The City Clerk shall post in the Office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance in accordance with Government Code Section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect thirly(30) days from and after the date of its final passage ADOPTED this day of , 2018. Teresa E. Smith, Mayor, City of Orange ATTEST: Robert Zornado, Chief Clerk, City of Orange STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF ORANGE ) ORD 11-18 6 GAS I,ROBERT ZORNADO, Chief Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2018, and thereafter at the regular meeting of said City Council duly held on the _ day of , 2018, was duly passed and adopted by the following vote,to wit: AYES: COLJNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Robert Zornado, Chief Clerk, City of Orange ORD 11-18 7 GAS THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix B: Photometric Analysis THIS PAGE INTEIVTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 330 N.Brand Blvd.Suite 950 Glendale,CA 91203 818.539.1111 • www.exp.com �� , � City of Hayward, Alameda County Digital Billboards Photometric Analysis Project Idumber 2017081.00 Prepared �y: Michael Schrupp Date Submitted 29 May,2017 City of Hayward,Alameda County Digital Billboards Photometric Analysis exp Project No. 2017081.00 29 May, 2097 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 NARRATIVE......................................•--.................---.......................................................................1 2.0 APPEND/X-FOOT-CANDLE LEVEL GRAPHIC SHEETS...........................................................3 ii City of Hayward,Alameda County Digital Billboards Photometric Analysis exp Project No. 2017081.00 29 May, 2097 1.0 NARRAT/VE We(exp engineering) have conducted a photometric review of the digital biliboard being proposed at 17302 Langton Way and 22083 Arbor Ave in Hayward, CA.. Using the photometric software AG132, we studied the screen's output brightness to determine the following: A) Potential modifications to the sign that may be needed to comply with the OAAA(Outdoor Advertising Association of America)Lighting Level Guideline, and B) The impact the sign will have at night on the surrounding community. The proposed billboard is to be 14'x48'with the top of the sign mounted at+80' above the ground with maximum screen brightness of 300 NITS (300 Candela per Square Meter)in the evening. Per OAAA guidelines,the proposed sign, displaying a full white image(for maximum brightness) should not exceed .3 foot candles over the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250' in any direction. The photometry used in this study is based on the specified Nichia series 336 LED modules,which output light horizontally at 90° and 45°vertically, at the evening output level of 300 Candela per Square Meter. As we are unable to determine what the ambient light levels will be at the location, the studies were done assuming the worst-case scenario of no ambient light. We have included graphical illustrations demonstrating the light levels in foot-candles we expect from the screen. SHEET 1 of the attachment is a location plan at the 17302 Langton Way site, indicating the 250' boundary overlaid on a map of the proposed site,as well as the projected relative angle of light emanating from the sign. SHEET 2 shows the overall light levels at the ground,freeway, and adjacent buildings over the entire Langton area. SHEET 3 is a graphic representation of the light levels impacting the adjacent residential buildings around the Langton site. Page 1 City of Hayward,Alameda Counfy Digifal Billboards Photometric Analysis exp Project No. 2097089.00 29 May, 2097 SHEET 4 of the attachment is a location plan at the 22083 Arbor Ave site, indicating the 250' boundary overlaid on a map of the proposed site, as well as the projected relative angle of light emanating from the sign. SHEET 5 shows the overall light levels at the ground,freeway onramp,freeway, and buildings adjacent to the Arbor area. SHEET 6 is a graphic representation of the light levels impacting the adjacent residential buildings around the Arbor site. Conclusions We see no light levels in excess of.3fc beyond the 250' radius of the signs, nor do we find any significant impact to the neighboring property provided the sign brightness is reduced after dark to the 300 NIT level. This report, prepared by exp Services Inc., is intended for the exclusive use of Alameda County, Recon Environmental and Outfront Media. Neither exp Services Inc.,Alameda County, Recon Environmental nor Outfront Media assume any liability for the use of this report, or for the use of any information disclosed in the report, or for damages resulting from the use of this report, by other parties. Page 2 City of Hayward,Alameda County Digifal Billboards Photometric Analysis exp Project No. 2017089.00 29 May, 2017 Appendix Foot-candle Level Graphic Sheets � Page 3 �_ „� , � _ , , � .,,�.,�-�: - , , � �,,,,�.,�-,,.?`"""'�. ,, , , , - �,i.�"£�,w. � � ' � .,. , r� `aaLib t �: �, ; . i � �. ">" ��-,.�.. � � � ' � � . _ f , � ' . w,' � � t � � � .,v��„�� ' �' . �� *, �. ,J, . ��,,�� _'`�p.,nu�.�, �� i�,, '�. A_,1 ' 1 ' ',,,. �� , � � ' � ..�-"^r". �.,..,�,.. � •�?Ic.•1 i, i t :� �"� ,...-w"�..,,�_i., � i �i�'� w . ., , r�r�Y.a� Ct]'ti7 .�. � � t � �f * � � � �,y! �� , ,` �� ; `�)c' ,u„�..,a,. ""��"" xf[� �� '� � � . ..-^.W:C^.� ..^'.�'�"N �'�.'"1 !s 3�' . � rirl� ,�.''li"`t1 'J�,��; .a��y�„.��T4"� +F�2� . ' . .F�e� ' .. ie;f�Ii�'I �f` _�S ,.,'.`y ♦ . ^ . ,�,�,�r,.... t F ��na,�,;t - . .. ° h. ,��,..a.�ub"."" � ,^Cr'�,,,,...,-•-"""" , � �t :.fy t��P�ji '' t 1 . � Y k � � tu•' '.,".. � 4 :�r"�� . . . .« i�a' � � �,,,;;,�...�+�"`" . "'""� "g . � � • .. . ,• r + � ,.m r.n�r � , ,i i`a • .�{� � + e;? � � .e .,,,. y�„r,..- � y.2��.'1•�" c3� � � . e3b . �. �.:.� +, .,,...-�-'•'.'�w�-- �. 1� �� rS, 1 � . �`.�a�.. r � � � ., ;�� }1 ��, •.,,;.�..a t � ' t r �`..�«. b .+�� . , �' �► "�• ' ��,,...a�+"'o . . � �` � f . . �,��, = � � � �� ..��+ y �' . � - .. . 1. ,�� `� � i��M�.�i41 ,.,..� , � , -. �� , t o 4t�;r,,..��,�.rw+r�' � ...a � . �i rr�MXr � �a°� � , �� ""� �� `°ix ..r •�' ., � ` $e �� :. � . ,,� � t � �,,_..»-^ � ,...,� � � � �,�b"'""`"re+ � �'' �^ ,, . - • < . - r»-'^ �., �+�t+�.��° _�, � � � � .. , •. �1 +�� },.. ��4R. � - ,,,,,, •e,c � . � � r � � �' `i.E� a.' . � � .,�.� 'y�y'>,,P.��,,,' �� . ; „ „ - � ,... . �. ...... � �,�,:E.. .. i � . lt� .,� -l•.. ' ._ . r..*k`' " f � � t . 4 µ. + .. . o � •••- w.,.�.^ � ,. .� � r c � � r��"�1'♦`. � � �c� i��. +�#�' .i,*�rr+`/r �i ` .... ��J�,,,r� ��c+' t �;,,,w.a= ,,,,, ,.-+++"r" ,�,Jo Y •�� ..,t � � > . ... .��`x*, ,, ��„�.a^,�"" - . � � , <�- y�,-..�.,.. .. } `��„.,, e�.' 1 ' ats* � �.pr�t's,�c �`'i�"�''�""�'`�° , '!�'� ��4�t%`). ' �,,,,,�.r�,,�� . � �• dj,,:) .��J•� .. � � � G� ..,p 4r" � �,d�"y��,� �� ti `.. �.�""�' �. ['i,.� u) `3 ��a. ' � � �. .,^.` a .. y �z,pl"�'i��JY'"' � - .. �1�. � ' . � � "",. � .. •. � � , �.�'�^ b,- .�,iir� ,� 1 7 � "� :�, ;" �^$' ..i�gt.3 ��,., C��u+�. . i. . ^ . � , \, ` - t . �r ,l � . t x� � � ►vY"��t"� �i � � �` '+ `�� 2 ^e, { `U Gi a,.,.d.."i `.n` .. ..�"k�`� ._�/.. Pa.. . J: .� �,� ,. /4.� �Jrs��.,:�, N�'_:sr .. i ' �+4`� �! '�. +'Y t'��,�,,, . ��. l.ti. "rY r f 7. ,i ��`,. ""�� l":� �.e r�'� .j..��"� '": , �, . �., . 1 � � , r i � � r ��'tv.r �,;t✓ � �,.. ,. ;�,i I'� . • ' ``' , or � .� � , �.�. ,l , � ,�„. , °�� ' 1 ` ' 7 '��" r Y xl . u .. ' ` .. ,# Y.�,� ...~, 'k.,,�� ,, + ��'1 ��,� � .�.J � � "1't� � �'�� { ';� . ' �.t U��1-*r�'}c,� . -�� ',:� �,� � ��',�� ..� � �'�r �,�R� �'" � ,,, ♦ , .� '� L „ ',5� � � � _� � � �.�.�`�xb w,r�'?�,`e�4 ^-•... �, � y��Y . . f ' i " � i ' '. � 4 ....�ti a !' �Y ��• _ �� ,��»�< .� '�- .`' ` �� " ,.` '. i ` . . .r� � ; .. • ,{ . . ,� ,, , �,•t . ' �. . . � ll]-�i� r�.k r "l' ' ^ +�,Y�rt��tr � �.... ..� . , T � �i ✓ � {(.� [ E }� , G . . /� . e � � � m� f � �� . ��,t�l � �� F,��.. _�' . �.. . J' � � . , �.f• / 4 w , ,�ir;�+) � �:' ' ��v..�'. ��'� ,�,.47�. �i c�' t�'• � . ��.a '+ ' I f. �P ll.+ti+�Y+'}^" $ '""'._ .�� ,�- �f• � . . ' ;� �_, �y .�. 0 .. a 5' 1 . , �. � ' � � 'h .r J g4* �. M �� - / .� �+ ' t ` ' �i� W"'.' ...'--.� �� ' � ,� .. . �.��r� � . • ,� e .�, � 'c. ( � * n>.. � .1 s.i ,:Y� � �`ct�).�: �� 6 e � ' • � F� .� � • �� _ • 1 � / � • • . ( � • _ _ _ � � ,� � ' . �-«'s,. �,r,Fe,w'v'^,. •° .� •.tt.;��.- +LR7 � r�..��...+ a _ - . ,; y� . '� [�.�+ .�`,��^ Lb � ^ •---^'' � .. r.,- - � .. . u' . � "`"`�" p:., ��'�_� �� '^� �.,�tt�f � .tie :""'�...--,.s� 3� '� �.> .r ` ` ,�� ru•>fn�uii ' `U! _ � n,p..0 . , � .�.. ----r ' . ,. - ° � r �.:- , _.��-- . ' .u ��a � ✓ , . y. � . __,_.-�^' � ' .....--t'�.��...�--�''" �� •�'� _----.' ....� Y"." q"��. � .�,.�`.1+' � �,s�-,�6 . . . �. .-r.��r. �I��. ��'� �,„...�•-��,.a.,.�'" .T�- . � �... . „. y� . . ..�:~ ' _ .��.� t r{ �� •� l� ,If++---� __ .""'�-' . .`r ..�r,-.r-.'_ �� rJ# ._- .� L�,G_-- � �„ "�'r�r . '^:., a��'� � �" ;"� °2�f� Wr�, �.__-�^" .r^"`1, ' � . `.�,_rJ,�-�p . _ .. a''� �� . t F�� 'f?� ,--" .. :; r_,,,_,,,,�,,,,,..�.+^'�"`...-r-", " .. ' tYJ `"i.A�E .�.:. ...w.." �m r-'"� _ __ -- ' ' .. , ' . ,'C!�•- �r" • . . ��'a�'.:.'r.. - ''�'af ' " . � � r^:lt'r` ,�J. � �:,.-�r �\:.�� r � �� '�.. '' \'t4. '_, �..r�"..:�^"�rr..+...i��J' . v��wFti: .f '�� .� .;�.. � d`� L .Y` ��, � .4 ' T� _..•��"� a.� .�� ti('•y)y ��` `s V"�Y �,';� � �* �1. � .c� . , j,�„�1 � 1...yh +�. � 5 ��,," � y y j� . � .,,�+ �-.� �� .. ,,' . .f �r' � ,,^ '.� �- y �+,^. ..� y;k:.� �; /�r,� -,.:Y` 9.v 4+..�, . „r--,r•• }a ^5 ' ' r �•r�t:i=1,,,n ' •. � ~ �'1 -*•� rf i ., . -•- u ;`'' �1'A«.�,j+ .' `� „'r- ' " `r �,,..J � '�N�'.", _ _--� �.,y • . x r' �..��,�!�'"��,,,,.` . .. 4 F� r � �'' ''�' �� ,F�+�y.• � �f-,� �� s.,r. T��t `� . ` �. ' t . ' .�` . . y ��S±s a �,�+i,,.,; r' �,µ � �., �� ' ;> y , �. . � �O', '(,.�`�i f,J'"�• • . •' �f''. . � � f ,�'�1 �. i j4 ��m� ��,.� .. ��' t . � .- _ ' � . �� ti�• .. , :� ,� . � ,��., �� . � � j �^ �� f _ ; • , . .. , ' �.y .�;.�, �ti=. : � . - ��! ��" �" ..�.,, � r.�r � .,�e . a� d � ' „ , 3 �i' � rABE G'�S�O�LINE y` . ., 1{ ' ' � "'c�- • •�q ` � j� 2^! " r f �r''{� �' �;; �: N�. ��,� � �,`�� .�. . . �ti..t F � '� 1 'k.. �"-_'��;.. �.� t� , .��- t.: � =�4�E F' ,� � w� •,� t� � , �.� - , ��, . G • ' _ � , i-�� ' � "� � � ' � ;; I, � �...;�tl ti ; �e+ - ,�a �n- � (� �y � � � „ ��, ""a, T i, r � _"" �'t�d':'�,�,'g;��S� r•� `J�.r�,,�.�.-""",. � �.�� 1 �...�_r �, �� ' ;�;• `` Y y, ^`v�_r� ✓,�,�� ,,,,.,�-�" � � V �_j � �. � �. 'h .�r �� 'i � �Caflln��j;� .�'�� _ .�•" , _ b fA°?iaza Dnvin��Sc�ool Y�'� ` ✓""'��=..;a% '"" Ja } 3 �,t2 4�+s'^a%'2+.r� , 3.�. , ..�`..'.. : 1 r t y.;1`. �Y+iG , � t� .tq1�•`% 1 1 ,,,?, Z �� y e�` �. � 9 i'S L h*rr+3� s�A-�s f r` +iP�`��,�-1*� i'�.r�� d, .Y ; t Yy, �„ • �' ,�'� �,. ��h'�+ ,� �zw �k �'�'�= �r r ��t� ��t a�� ti�� e�� k .� `iie��t�.g ,^�.��y�r. Sa kr"�X x�,�_.-f'` �`..� ¢t r ts ,� �r ,�'�'r r uf ,k �°i �ir w r��.� ,,��,�y .a `�� tt�"+�t�•� k��.tc��+�,�f, i C':f��. � _ �� ,�.i�,��,.'Xt�•�v�k*'�� Yy�yy 5��,�t ��.',�� .. '.�-h`,.�Yrrx�� s >t.i... n_:.uEk�cx��.:i �.k�. xSl4. 1��1�xrkz;�"n��. -�'ft . �i. #4n..- zf.<.�?�Y �.�0 . - " _ _0.44 .38 'r'�. , ': , ',• � . . j� . , � � , �� x ::0.31 . :._,�_ Y w: - '',.:M:,._.,. � ' - ti.� ��t��4 `[�� _.. . - . , ��,�. ,� (Q�u��'% ��ar� .syTr�;�� 4, � �'-�.s 0.25 � ._ � ,� -- • - . i - -- ,- ' ' , .D.19 � ' � . . ,: .;. � ° �A.13 �0.06 0.00 Illuminance (Fc) � a. •. � . � � , �� ,,_ . . "" • � • � • . ,, .. c � . - � �� . � .. �L).`V ... .. _ . ' "'� t.,.p. +.,�,$` `-�.�,�r�«wvy<, "�fk'x, " , $f,.,4y.k.hi�.:.`,,: .,x..., .,: . . . �. . . ;�,»'Y ��=u d�:.; ' . _.. .R .. �� S`s`l r��J' , .�,, ... �, ,, .:� ,�` � . �.. �' � 3 ,� J ��_ �. � �+w �'" s � �� x• ... .� 4` : � \/e• � �, • .. . " -, . _� -__-� �a,�� ,� . . - • , ,. *, Yi7 , �•k,� � y.�� '-••�.,�k.� .., U lt �..� . . . . . .�'4?M'"' �y "��.' n• g �*'��,y � , ^ �2 • ��y� .i . � � • ,. .,;� \,;� . . '� �, ;;�� • ��„�:w ' ' fJ r J L sIe '�t;. ' iA �� ._ti'�� r - � r. : . ,.. � �.„ 4 �, ��, . - . '�. d:p r.� `�w . . . .. � � � . ' - �..�. ' � . . � ,�' � �p +. , _ ,�.� '�) ,_ :r,i � il 3 �Q I Y} ' r, o., � r�}` ,� ,� '�.,' 4 u �'% 3� � . � , � � � . ' • � ,t. 'r' �LS ��,� ` � +1e�k� ''"'°�*— _,, �. 1. �' ' "t=]'-:`..` {.'. �Jp•� '�� . �� ,� 4' • W a� ^-• ,,.,, ., , . .,... �.. y.�M.� � �� ,� r., .� � �� f ;, � . `'S �� . 4 � r{' . �f ,. ,,d � . Z:, . d` ��'°f. . .� ' . ' d J ��9e �� .dt f L r / r rK �� , 4�' ` . 4 � `'� � �, � �, �.a: � - . ` � �ii 'i''�.:<, � .. ��. ' • �r. , •a�.'A , t. ��,. � � � aw�v',� . . : „. � '��y r u�' ,�, t�^... pt . . - � � �� • - 'n S�``,� � „� "` -.�. ,t�- *' ' , - �` �„ ,�` c, .,��, �,. � �� . ax . . r ' � � �' L � , i a �'i . • y �, , . . .� '� f` „ r - - _ . +,� �.i c . �,�",' s '§k'M�� ;1 (�,Y � � s ,sa � ��"� `� t � �` p �� „1 �. . . ..��•� � 0.50 �4.44 ' �0.38 �s �. _0.31 1 � 0.25 0.19 , . A.13 i •' . 0.06 ° 0.00 � Illuminance (Fc) ' �^ ' � - • � «, _ • � � � , . . • .' c � . : . � 1 • . 1 r �"''7ti"�.�.� _ � .. � }; � « i07�» � .y 1 1 �ti.�, +'�{�t"`� ,i ��. � j� �� `� ,�.� ; � . �s, � � ��'``�.; ��. . �� y� � r� , � . `'�'�. 4! �J/j T. � � 1~� � R . — � .. �~�� +l / � , � jj , � !' � �i '�,A�''+�� -,,.,,� ,e,.,,, � � � � �;. �, -Ui°+,,,.,� 1"- � � , �' ' ` � ? �iy . � � b ��. !� � , ~'8,�"+�+.. � L � { ; w � . �"�' � , , u . . ��.T �'�. ... � � °J ;'�`'. �t " � s 1 C`� . , j I ,, i .� y ! 3 :: :��t � �.' .� , "l� , M'� . � � .. � r . ! {� . � . �. .'� I ; K ' " . . ' p , .� . � � ` `. ., ,�� n � Mi�1 � � � 4 1�`� � ;� . .. � f �� . L:^ �i �l �+ � i�� ` � ; � - N• � ',� .„ ..� a.. • � '�'{ � �oi t � � � �� ' w ` � j��z• , � T' ` f , � . � A � � �� . , . . �� " �x _ , � " � : , __.�' dt4*,�' � ; e! ��" + : �� ,� �; $ , � , � . � � , a•,:w�.��:1�� .'_:�.,. . , �.� �P!iQ � � � , �� } � � rl • �. ` .��1 x.• �' . . ' ' . , � +�i' . __ , i �• � . . � * r ' �" s� t r—Y �. .�f � , ' � � . , ; � �` ,. �, , � . , � � # � � , . � f ' . - • . ' + 4 _ • • • � � � � . . c � . . � � . . � . ,_. _. ...._. . � . _ �.,� ..--- - . �, .,. ._,_, r'�, iiK} - T `��ir��tz f=vvy-- .._ ��Y P�i�mitz - .. , . _i�� ..�_ . . p:,r4 a;'n.i .` 4 ' / .. "�,. r�� t/ t-~'" •• � , ,.:..._. ... . .. . ._ , __ __� .. .. . � '. ... � _.� �� . . _ . ��t ..» � . ��►� . . . . . � . « t" �.�J ,, { � • . ,� o ,�_� ,�`a ''—., '".. , `� . ,� . , � ,�� i ��; � , 4,{ f � ' 1' �1 4 * V , , � � ! � • ,Y - . • , �, ��'� � '` � � a �t 4 . � / � �.: -�--- � � ; . ,+.�. t �`� i�'�,'.;7' ,�1 �.. .-�' !•'? -��1��< <a��'-•• "ar1�� f'��C `��i�� 0.53 I0.45 . l t1.38 0.30 0.23 0.15 0.07 0.00 Illuminance (Fc) . ,� m • ' • � ' ' ' • ' * � • - � : � � - � • . . . c 1 . : . � 1 . ,. 1 i- �a r .� � � � � � � � � �� a , . . _� � >, .. �. , . M,a � -�.. .. ,� �� : _ ,.,T.� ��-,z. �� , :,. � :��r .�� .. w- � �. a ��_ �� t�, , .;:� _ .ro�x .. m�,�� OUTFRONT MEDIA LLC Arbor Avenue � �� HAYWARD BILLBOARDS Adjacent Buildings • 30 N.Brand Blvd.Suite Release:5/29/2017 950 6 of 6 Revision:0 THIS PAGE INTEIVTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix C: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Supporting Information THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK , CaIEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 1 Date:9/4/201 S 9:52 AM 0404.0014 City of Orange Billboard Removal site-Orange County,Summer 0404.0014 City of Orange Billboard Removal site Orange County,Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage ' Land Uses '"; �� Slze "' w Metnc =Lot qcieage Floor 5urtace qrea °Populatlon _. . : . ... .__ , _ _ _ ... • ...._ ..,:.. .,__ ., _; _ .. .,.,� .,. _.�:.�.__ _:,. . ,. ,.. . _ -� _ User Defined Industrial 1.00 User Defined Unit � 0.01�� 25.00 �� 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanlzation Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitatlon Freq(Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2018 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO21ntensity 702.44 CH4lntensity 0.029 N201ntansity 0.006 (IbIMWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments 8�Non-Default Data Project Characteristics-Removal sites-Construction only Land Use-Removal of existing billboards Construction Phase-It is expected to take approximately 2 working days per location to remove each of the existing billboard structures,for a maximum of approximately 6 working days to remove all 3 billboards. Off-road Equipment-Hand tools and small crane rigs would be used to remove the billboards. Trips and VMT-Additional vendor trips and haul trips were added to account for delivery of material and transport of removed billboards. ti Table Name Column Name.' � Default Value New.Value �:� � : . '�., .. ._�, .. :. .r. . . .�..... . . y �... ... .,.�._ ..�, =' , . .. , -�o_ ...�. ..., ._..., ._ ._. . . , . _ . . . ._,. ., . ...�... __� . .2s. _ tblConstructionPhase NumDays � 10.00 6.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet t 0.00 25.00 � tblLandUse LotAcreage � 0.00 0.01 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount f 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount j 2.00 1.00 E tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours � 1.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber � 0.00 � 6.00 lblTripsAndVMT � VendorTripNumber s 0.00 i 2.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction(Maximum Daily Emission) Unmiti4ated Construction f �' ROG' NOx<� W�f:, 502 .,,FugiUve Exhaust .RM70 Fugflrve Exhaust PM2 5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Totsl CO2�� CH4 �.N20 -.0O2e-��; { - ' �� ' -�,!. PM10 '-,PM10 .Total PM25 PM2.5 Total {�,.,.. .. .� . � „ . . .. � . _ .�,.. . ..... . ..... . .. ...... . . .. . .. ...... . ........ . . >c.... .. r ;. Year ' '� �- ' Ibfday, Ibldey �.,.:. _,.. ._ ...,....,= _ . :: _.. a ..�.:. . . _i.. .. , . �. � ._. ... ....... ...Fi� _. ..r ..., .. .... ,,., . , ,u _. ., .... .,. .,,.. ,..... . ... ._ . ,_.�... ..... 2018 �� 0.9142 8.1678 � 6.5565 0.0123 � 0.1'196 � 0.4841 � 0.6037 � 0.0322 0.4668 � 0.4990 � 0.0000 �1,20�.830 1,206.8305� O.1B04 � 0.0000 �1,211�.340 Mazimum 0.9742 8.1678 6.5565 0.0723 0.7796 0.4841 0.6D37 0.0322 0.4668 0.4990 O.00OD 7,206.830 �,206.83D5 0.7804 0.0000 1,21'1.340 5 6 Mitiqated Construction {�� ROG NOx-� CO � S02 .FugiLve Exhaust PM10 Fugitive E�aust PM2¢ &o-CO2 NBio-CO2 Totel CO2 : CH4 ��N20 CO2e ' E ,,. . '. -.., PM10 ��PM10 Total PM25 PM2.5 Tolal� n ..<_ . .' ,r._a�.. "� i t .._. . , .. ra .... ,... Year�:� . �.':�: � "�'� -.�,.� ��-: •Ib day- -...__ .._:1Wday. �',-. , .. . .... : ,..__ .. ,. . .,,.., ..,.,<a. �.., . _.. . . _... ...._.._ ....,... ,..._ _ .,,.... .. .. ..� , _ .. _ 2018 �i 0.9142 8.'1678 I 6.5565 I 0.0123 0.1196 � 0.4841 0.6037 i 0.0322 I 0.4668 i 0.4990 0.0000 �1,206.830,1,206.8305 0.1804 + 0.0000 1,211.340 ; � 5 6 Maximum 0.9742 8.1678 6.5565 0.0123 0.7796 0.4841 0.6037 0.0322 0.4668 0.4990 0.0000 7,2U6.830 7,20fi.8305 0.7604 a.a000 1,277.340 5 6 ROG�; NOx.> CO '„ S02 ��Fugitrve Exhaust P,M10t Fugltive ExhBust PM25'= Blo CO2�NBIoCO2�TotaICO2 "�CH4 ,N20 CO2e��; �:��` -� � -� ' PM70 `PM'10 �ToWI PM25 PM2.5 Tolal�- s Percent � 0.00, 0.00 0.00 � 0.00 � 0.00 0.00 �0.00 O.OU 0.00 0.00� 0.00 0.00� 0.00 0.00 �0.00 0.00 � Reductian 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase '. Phase Name " Phase Type ., Start Date End Date Num:Days Num'Days Phase Descnption _ �,Number Week � t_. ... .. `�... .�.. „�:. .... ..:;�:.,. .:. �.... . ..�.��. .. .:'�. _ ..... z.1 .. ,..:. ..... .. ' ,,: .. '. :; Z ...,..._ ..� ..... ........ _,..... .s.... :... _ . ... ,... 1 �oemolition `Demolitlon �10/1/2018 �1018/2018 � 5� s� Acres of Grading(Site Preparation Phase):0 Acres of Grading(Grading Phase):0 Acres of Paving:0 Residential Indoor:0;Residential Outdoor:0;Non-Residential Indoor:0;Non-Residential Outdoor:0;Striped Parking Area:0 OffFtoad Eauipment :;.- �Phase Name : Offroad Equipment Type;` -Amount' ., Usage Hours Ho[se Power Load Factot ; Demolition.,.�:,,. . . _..._�..Concr:. .N, _�._ _... .�_. , _�..._z F ._._ , .m�.,_.,�_. o , .r ,. . ,..... _._, ,.,_:.,.-. ete/Industrial Saws 1 f 8.00 81� 0.73 Demolltlon Cranes 1 2.00 231I 0.29 Demolition RubberTired Dozers D 0.00 247 0.4 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes } 1 6.00� 97� 0.3 Trias and VMT �-- Phase Name ..? Qffroad Equipment 'W.orker Tnp. `Vendor Trip Hauling Tnp Worker Tnp :Yendor Tnp,` Hauling Trip Worker.Vehicle j`Vendor"; Haulingt`,, (,; � ; Counk Num6er Number Numlier � Length � . Length . j �Length _� Cla"ss 3; Vehicle ; Vehicle:;.' k.�. . �.'' : � . i ' : :�: . ' �. .. .Class Class....". . _:. . . , .. . . ... ...... _ ... ... ... . _ ... .. ... . ... . ..., ,.... �, .t, .. ._. . ., .._ _. . .. ._. . _. Demolitlon � 3� 8.00� 2.00! 6.00� 14.70! 6.90� 20.OD�LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix �HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition-2018 Unmitiqated Construction On-Site '" '""" ,ROG' NOx"", CO ` S02 �:-Fugitive !,Exhaust ';PM10 FuglWe Exhaust PM2;5 BIo-0O2 NBIo-0O2 TotaICO2 ' CH4 ."�N20 "CO2e;'� ;�,y ,� PM10 '�;PM70 �Total ��PM26 PM2�.b TalaL+ �. ' r. - t=� . ;-, , .. ,. . , , .,- . , ,- . . , :. .: - � �. , .,, .... <,. ... . _�.� ..:.,„;. ,....... .._ . ..,_, .�.:;a.. . •._ . .i �`. Category... . ...... . ... .:: . .._. .�-.:'-�� Ib/day, � ; .,� `�.. �Iblday _ t .. .. _.._ :_,. , � -.-_ . : . . .:.:..... .:-:..:. ::_.. ... �,._. .. . ..:. .. . ..:... .._,:. . .._.�. _...:_., _. ...,,......: OH-Road 0.8616 � 7.5924 � 6.1W1 0.0100 �� { 0.4805 0.4805 � �0.4634 0.4634 i972.3961 972.3961 � 0.1641 S 976.4986 - i � Total 0.8676 7.5924 6.7077 0.0100 0.4805 0.4805 OA634 OA634 972.3961 972.396� 0.764� 976.4986 Unmitiaated Construction Off-Site . ` �^'�ROG: , NOx;i�: CO,'-i S02�-•�.Fugihve-�;,:Exhaust -��PM70 sFpgi6ve_ �,Exhaus[ �PM2:5 'Bio-`CO2 NBio=�:C,02 Totsl G02�-; CH4, '�".N20 �•�,::CO2a;�� _ � . . ��, PM10 .,PM10 ��Total PM25 PM2_5 Total. .�:i - ... . -._ . ._ • . . . .. . ... ...., Cate o ' � . � ,.'.. , _9�Y�.:' .""'e- ,-� --;��r ;.,.- Ib/�ay, �. :� _ "^+INAay ._ ........... . . ...�.... ..,__.. ._.. . .,.._. ..,. ;,. . .. . :.. . �..,.... �.._ ._,. ,. .. . ._ ..__ ,..-... _.... .__ .... ,.,,. .. .. ... .�.... ,._ Hauling 8.6300e 0.3124 0.071'I 7.BOOOe- 0.0174 12400e- 0.0187 4.7700e 1.1900e- 5.9600e- i 87.0347 B7.0347 ��9.090�e-� � 972620 jf 003 ( 004 003 003 003 003 � �j 003 Vendor i 8.1000e- 0.2386 I 0.0640 I 5.1000a- 0.0128 1.7700e-I 0.0145 3.6800e-` 1.6900e-� 5.3700e- ( 54.8657 54.8657 I 4.780�e-I I 54.9847 ( 003 = � 004 f 003 003 003 003 � � 003 t Worker 1 0.0358 0.0244 � 0.3142 I 9'004� 0.0894 �5'004 e-I 0.0900 0.0237 5.4�0�Oe-� 0.0243 � 92.5341 I 92.5341 �z'003�� I 9Z.5953 E 1 Total 0.0526 0.5753 0.4493 2.2200e- 0.1796 3.6000e- 0.1232 0.0322 3.4200e- 0.0356 234.4344 234A344 0.0163 234.8420 003 003 OD3 Mitiqated Construction On-Site ::.' �'s° �,ROG:_ NOx�' CO;�.,= S02 �. �Fugitive xE�aust.�tPM70 ;;Fugihve ,Exhaust P.M2.5�� BIo-0O2'N8o-0O2 TotaICO2•# CH4�j 'r N20 ;.0O2e�!� � '� ' PM10: '�"�PM10 �.'Total., 'PM25 PM2.5 Tolal r'�, � , „_ ; ; � , � .. . ., .. , .._ . . ._ .....,.._ . ,. _.-. ..�,. __: ., . .. . ,. ... ..... ... . . ..- Calegory.-.. .� �-... ..��..�.. . .' . ...:.. _,Ibldey . .� ..,,.. ......--:. �.�-- ... ..� ....,,. , ;.�._ .._ - �Itilday: . . . ... .-..�. ,. .....- ,,.. .... ....... ... ., . ....,...�.._,.��. . ,.,,....,. ,... .,.,.,r. .,.....•. ,,....., ..... . ...:... ,_ �e.., . .... �,.. . ..... .,.,. . Off-Road �� 0.8616 � 7.5924 � 6.1071 � 0.0100 i ;�0.4805 � 0.4805 I ( 0.4634 ; 0.4634 ; 0.0000 �972.3961 i 972.3961; 0.1641 ; I 976.4986 � � � � � � ToWI 0.8616 7.5924 6.1071 0.0100 OABOS 0.4805 0.4634 OA634 O.OD00 972.39fi1 972.3961 0.'1641 976.4986 Mitiaated Construction Off-Site '-' ,�" ROO'= NOx":, CO -;g S02 .,,, � , , t . .;.'Fugihve ;;,Fxhaust :PM10 Fugitive Exhaust� �PM2:5 BIo-,CO2 NBIo-0O2 Total CO2;_: CH4 :}N2 r`.".0O2e��,! ;`"� ' ..:' ��. ..:: ? ;; PM10 ��.PM10 ,�Total PM26 PM2.5 � Totel� _ . , ... . .. .� � .. . .c. _ . ......Category.�. . -::_ ..... . � `'r . .:'-:'� � Iblday,,_ � '-'"�. � -�;: ..,'. . - �Iblday. � : ; ,. �, � ;- 4 ,, . . ��--�;, _r. ., .__ . ....:,. ..„.. . �.r ... ..`u_.. . ,.:.. Hauling i 8.6300e- 0.3124 0.0711 7.BOOOe- 0.0174 '12400e-' 0.0187 4.7700a-' 1.1900e-` 5.9600e- ' 87.0347 87.0347 �9.0900e-'`A 872620 Vendor � 0.1000r 02386 I 0.0640 � 5.OOOe-i 0.0120 �1.700e- 0.0145 3.68 Oa 1.69 Oe- 5.3700e- ' 54.8657 � 54.8657 i 4.7600e-� � 54.9847 003 004 0�3 003 003 � 003 1 � I 003 I Worker i 0.0358 0.0244 � 0.3142 � 9.3000e-� 0.0894 �5.9DOOe- 0.0900 0.0237 5.4000e-f 0.0243 1 92.5341 � 92.5347 I 2.4500a� ! 92.5953 � � � ' ooa ( ( ooa I I I ooa I I I � I 003 I I Total 0.0526 0.5753 0.4493 2.2200e- 0.'1196 3.6000e- 0.7232 0.0322 3.4200e- 0.0356 234.4344 234A344 0.0163 234.8420 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 1 Date:9/4/2018 10:11 AM 0404.0014 City of Orange Billboard Construction-Orange County,Summer 0404.0014 City of Orange Biliboard Construction Orange County,Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Slze Metfic Lot Acreage Floor Surface/Uea 6 :Population; �' ,�. ,i t; x �` � � ��.. . ..k.....,. . .. �. .. _..., .. . _. . a ,� .....� ,, . ...� ,t ,... t,..... ._ . .... ,.. ,. �. . ,... .. User Defined Industrial 1.00 3 User Defined Unit � 0.01 � 25.00 0 1.2 Other Project CFiaracteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2018 Utiiity Company Southem Califomia Edison CO21ntenslty 702.44 CH4lntensity 0.029 N201ntensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (IbIMWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments&Non-Default Data Project Characteristics-Construction only Land Use-Construction only Construction Phase-Billboard construction will take approximately 2-4 weeks to complete. Off-road Equipment-Estimated construction equipment Off-road Equipment-Estimated construction equipment Trips and VMT-Additional worker trips and vendor trips added to the building construction phase to account for the delivery of materials. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation- �_.._ � z Tabla Name Column Name�" , ' 'Defauit Value New Vaiue � .:.�.. . ,. . .. ...,.:_.� . ,.. :: ., . _..�.: �_.:..... , e.�. -_ ..,.. .• i ,........<. ..,.. >.�... . ,.. .._. ........ . .._t.. ._...._...... tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated ( 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays I 100.00 20.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet � 0.00 25.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.01 tblOffRoadEquipment � OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount � 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount I 2.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber I 0.00 I 2.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 8.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction(Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitivated Construction �-� ROG,� NOx ` CO:.' - S02 ::Fugitive �Exhaust `,PM10 Fu iWe Exhaust PM25 Bio-0O2 NBIo-0O2 TotaICO2 '- CH4 ;-N20 CO2e" 9 -'�- ��-, �� f ' . . . ` PM10 .r�PM10 Total PM25 PM2:5 TotalS �` � . _ . . -. _.._ . _ ._. _. .. _ _ __ -_, ._, �.. .. ..,..._ , . � ."�_.. . ..�. ... �.. t Year,�,�„ .. ,y _ .� : --.. '.��.� �;Ib/day - _ �"� '-9blday � :. ,., , � . �, , ..- :. .. ' ,. . �...` . �,.,. �. ..... .. ... . ...��. .... ._.:-. _ .. ._. ..,, -.. .� .-- .. . ��_.' ,. - � ... ...... .. . .�.�� :. �. .. ..., . .., .. . �.�...:._. . ,�. 20'18 i! 0.4629 i 4.8542 3 2.5476 f 5.407�03 e- i 0.1022 ! 02442 i 0.3464 ; 0.0274 ! 02247 ` D.2521 I O.00OD i 553.0394�553.0394� 0.1335 � 0.0000 i 556.3767 � � { � � � � Maxlmum 0.4629 4.8542 2.5476 5.4700e- 0.7022 0.2442 0.3464 0.0274 02247 0.2521 0.0000 553.0394 553.0394 0.7335 0.0000 556.3767 , 003 Miti4ated Construction ' ROG r NOxs� CO ' S02 �,�Fugitive},Exhaust 1�FM10 ^Fugihve Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2�.:' CH4 ��'�N20 � 'p02a �. r�� - �_�� S�� -.:�PM10�� 'PM10 - Total �PM25� PM215 Totel: ' _ , t . � -��' Year �c �... ; .t � Iblday.- . � Iblday . ,,. . ..M,.� ..,.. .�. . ...._..._ ... ..... ..... ... > _. ..�....:. ... . ..._._,..o.. .er ...... � .. .�. _.._ .._.. �. .. ...,._.. ......;_ .. .�_._ _ ... ._...e.. ., 2018 ii 0.4629 i 4.854z ! Z.54�6 i 5�003 e- ! 0.1022 k 02442 i 0.3464 ! 0.0274 i 02247 ! 0252'I i O.00OD i 553.0394 i 553.0394 i 0.1335 I 0.0000 i 556.3767 i � I � 1 � i Maxim�m QAfi29 4.8542 2.547fi 5.4700e- 0.1022 0.2442 0.3464 0.0274 0.2247 0.2521 O.OU00 553.0394 553.0394 0.1335 0.0000 556.3767 003 '�, ROG: NOx- CO . ��. 502 �#ugltiva -Exhaust PM70 FuglOvo Exhaust PM2 5� 810 CO2 NBio�02 Totai CO2 �� CN4 �N20 .-�CO2e�! �- _ ��.-� �-PM70 PM70 Total PM2 5 PM2 5 Total�-� � ...:..,. . . . .:_.. ..,..,.:... . ...,.. .. . ._... ._.. .. .. ..... .. ..: ..� .,�..� _. .....�.... ...... ..... .�.,.< _ , . �,,....._. . .., .... ._.,.: Pcrcent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � �0.00� Redudion 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase ;" Pfiase Name ' Phase Type f Start Date End Date Num-Days Num Days " Phase Descnptwn Number Week , � __ ,,. . � �.:�..-.. ..,.;- . . �,� . _,: :... ... .. ..:�. . . �e.r._ ..,.::. . . .. �..,... . :. t «_,�t . ,r. ..., . ._.,. .. ... .. _ .. .,.«. .., 1 �Building Construction �8uilding Construction �10/1/2018 10l26/2018 � 5� 20� Acres of Grading(Site Preparation Phase):0 Acres of Grading(Grading Phase):0 Acres of Paving:0 Residential Indoor:0;Residential Outdoor:0;Non-Residential Indoor:0;Non-Residential Outdoor:0;Striped Parking Area:0 OffRoad Eauipment '' ;Phase Name ;' _Offroad Equipment Type, Amount Usage Hours,; Horse P,ower �Coad Factot .; , � ,.�� , _..,.,.w. , ......� ...,..-.. ,,..�.r.. ,.. .� .. .r-.... . . . ..�... , a ..._ ��.. Building Construction Cranes , 1! 4.00� 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts � 1 6.00� 89� 0.20 Buliding Constructlon (Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes � 0' 8.00� 97i 0.37 Trias and VMT Phase;Name �- ,OffroadEquipmeot WorkerTnp; VendorTrip Hauling;Trip Wo�kerTrip VendorTnp; Haulmg:Trip iWorkecVehicley ; Vendor,""- HaulmgF- f.%; . . ,.-, , . r . . . ..� t,; Count `Numbe�.'r Numbe�: Nomber Length' `;Length " Length� � ;Cl,ass `� Vehicle :" Vehicle:-� ,, . � r' r , _. L.•.._ . . ._�.�. .._�., . �:;... .. _�.:,.. . �..: _ ...> > . ., '_= . ___ _, - � a '_�.. _ ,..-�.•.. .�. ...; Class_s�F Qlassl.z;� - �--..._ _.....,._.. :..3 :_... _ Building Construction � 2i 8.00� 2.00I 0.00� 14.70 6.90 20.00�LD_Mix jHDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Building Construction-2018 Unmltl4ated Construction On-Site 1% "� ' "a.' 'ROG;:. NOx,"c:, ��CO;"�,-� S02!,.:`;FugiLve.�.�.Exhaust �-.FM10 �FuglWe'e•F�d7aust,. PM2d5� BIoCO2 NBIo-G02TotaICO2�:=' CH4 �''tN20 ;CO2e�,..� � � '� � � PM10 -�-'PM10 'i Sofal ��PM2 5 FM2[5 Total:' � '�' Category��,i�, `n�. . , :;. ._....:. :<:,. ..Ib/day,. ,..,� �: - '.Iblday .: :.. ..... ...� ,. _,.._. _.: :.�- ..:...:-. ...,.,•- „ � , .::.. . ..-_..._.... ...��;.,.. .,_�. ,>.<,,..,..�.-..-_... ....:,.:. , ....:..-... . ....-_ ..� ., �,� ..:. ....,..-... OB-Road � 0.4190 4.5913 2.1694 4.0300e-� 02419 02419 0.2225 � 02225 405.6397 405.6397 0.1263 408.7967 It 1 003 1 I 1 I I I ToWI 0.4190 4.5973 2.1694 4.0300e- 02419 02419 0.2225 0.2225 405.6397 405.6397 0.7263 408.7967 003 Unmitlqated Construction Off-Site "' ��_�'- 'ROG<'�, rNOx?_�� CO:�--�r S02 :r'^Fugihva�,jExhaust �<.��PMW ��=Pugitive :�Exhaust� "P.M2�_5", �BIo=CO2'NBio;£02 TotaIG02�;� CH4- -"+'�N20 " �,CO2e°'; . �-PM70�. ".'PM10� . Totel .��PM2.5, PM2:5 ;,TotaL. . �-s i .�,?�.�. ._. . �. .,. , �... ., ...:. -__ ..:„ ,....Category:.... . ...,.� �_.,..,, , .,:,; ... � Ibldey- . ..,. ....... _- . . . 'Itilday _ , � .. .�; � �.- �... �. �., . ` . . . � .�.,......, �_: � . . .. __,.. ,. �-�a ,.. . �: ::..' - ;v Haulingc� 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 A 0.0000 � 0.0000 O.00OD O.D000 0.0000 0.0000 � a.0000 i o.0000 o.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 Vendor 8.1000e- 02386 0.0640 5.1000r 0.0128 1.7700e- 0.0145 3.6800e- 1.6900e-� 5.3700e- ( 54.8657 54.8657 4.7600e- 54.9847 � 003 � 004 � 003 003 003 ' 003 � I 003 Worker �I 0.0358 � 0.0244 � 0.3142 9.30��Oe-� 0.0894 5.9�O�OQOe- 0.0900 0.0237 �5'004�� 0.0243 � � 92.5341 92.5341 �Z'003 e-� 92.5953 � Total 0.0439 0.2629 0.3783 1.4400e- 0.7022 2.3600e- 0.7046 0.0274 2.2300e- 0.0296 147.3997 147.3997 7.2100e- 147.5800 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ,: '��""' ROG.: "�-�NOx" CO_'?<. 502� "�-Fugitiva=:;�Exhaust't'-PM70 �.Fu iWa', �Exhaust P.M2.5, -Bio-CO2.NBio-CO2 Total CO2<; CH4��:�:s��N20`"'�'CO2e"�: :� . ,'�- ' = ..;' ._ ;. PM10 ;y�.PM70� .' Tatal PM2 5, PIti12.5 .Totel' " .. .., �. .. ... �.,, _...:..� ....,.::: ...��.....: ., . :.-�., ... -..��::... .. ,�.�::,.,,.. -1.:-,:,.,. - . . ..�,. .... _.. . ,:,.-� Category;::' ...., . ..:,. _-.:: ........_, �Ib/tlay.' _ _,_ ,:;- .,,.�. _ .;Iblday , i : � , . ,. . ..., ... . , .. .�.., �� :. -: -._ .-. �.�.. ,�.. „�.... ., , ,:.a. � ,�:.. . � � �._� . �... }. __ . .. .. . . .... . .....,.�_, .. _,.....-.._ .,,._,.. ...>... . ....,,........,, .. ., . . .,..,> . . ....:: ... .,_ _.... . ., .,.. , . -.,.,._. Oft-Road �� 0.419D � 4.5913 i 2.1694 I 4'003 e-` � 0.2419 � 02419 � � 02225 � 02225 i 0.0000 �405.6397 405.6397 0.1263 i i 408.7967 � Total 0.419D 4.5973 2.7694 4.0300e• 0.2419 0.2479 02225 0.2225 0.0000 405.6397 405.6397 0.1263 408.7967 003 Miti4ated Construction OffSite "' � � ROG�, NOx�'" CO ::;, S02 ',.,'Fugitive�";;Exhaust�:'�.PM10 FuglNve Exhaus[ PM2�.5 BIo-,CO2 NBio CO2 Total CO2 ;.. CH4 -;,N20 ��,CO2e,' +,PM10"N�.;�PM10+ ..�'ltotal `PN125 PM2.`5 Total`� ' r ,�. � .. _.. ., . : .. ,� ;�� Category;.. .:�.. .-r � �.. .:^. Iblday. ."..: "Ib/day _ _ , n ., , ,: . , .. _ - , ., . ..u. . , . ... �.,_ . , � . ..:' ,� _ <. v . i :._. ,............. . .... .. .< ... ....... . .... .,. ...... ,... ._.._ � ._ . ., :.. .. .. ... ..,..:_... , ..., .... ..._ . . . _ ,..... . _ ., ..,.,... Hauling ' 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 00000 O.00OD 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.00OD ' 0.000� 0.0000 0.0000 ` O.ODaO � � ' . Vendor ! 8.1000e- 02386 i 0.0640 � 5.1000e- 0.0128 �1.7700e-� 0.0145 �3.6800r� 1.6900e-I 5.3700e- 54.8657 f 54.8657 �4.7600e-E � 54.g847 f 003 f I 004 � 003 � 003 � 003 � 003 � � 003 � f Workef ( 0.0358 0.0244 ! 0.3142 9.3000a 0.0894 �5.9000e- 0.0900 0.0237 �5.4000e- 0.0243 92.5341 92.5341 2.4500a' I 92.5953 II I I I ooa I � ooa I I ooa I I ! I o03 � I Total 0.0439 0.2629 0.3763 1.4400e- 0.7022 2.3600e• 0.7046 0.0274 2.2300e- 0.0296 747.3997 147.3997 7.2100e- 147.5800 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 1 Date:8/30/2018 3:04 PM 0404.0014 City of Orange Billboard Removal site-Orange County,Annual 0404.0014 City of Orange Billboard Removal site Orange County,Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage � ' Lantl.Uses �' ` Size ' '_ •� �'- MeMc LotAcreage floor5urtaceRrea Populatlon':" ._. . .. _ .> . _...- ._ . . , .... ._, . _.... . .. . ... .r. . ..:... .. . ::. . User Defined Industrial � 1.00 User Defined Unit � 0.01 25.00 � 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2018 Utiiity Company Southern Califomia Edison CO21ntensity 702.44 CH4lntansity 0.029 N201ntensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (IblMWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments&Non-Default Data Project Characteristics-Removal sites-Construction only Land Use-Removal of existing billboards Construction Phase-It is expected to take approximately 2 working days per Iocation to remove each of the existing billboard structures,for a maximum of approximately 6 working days to remove all 3 billboards. Off-road Equipment-Hand tools and small crane rigs would be used to remove the billboards. Trips and VMT-Additional vendor trips and haul trips were added to account for delivery of material and transport of removed billboards. . . Table Name ; Column Name ;Default Velue NewValue ,_,_. . .. �_T .. _. , .z :. ,. .. ,__. ... �. r,. � .... .....3,.� ....,._,� .�. .., u_a tbiConstructionPhase � NumDays � 10.00 6.00 tblConstructlonPhase PhaseEndDate 10/12/2018 10/8/2018 tblLandUse I LandUseSquareFeet � 0.00 25.00 tblLandUse � LotAcreage 0.00 0.01 tbl0(tRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Cranes tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOfiRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount � 2.00 � 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours � 1.00 � 0.00 tblTripsMdVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsMdVMT VendorTripNumber � 0.00 � 2.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitiaated Construction �': ROG�.� NOxr�:> CO��'� S02 '� FugiUve Exhaust ;FM70 Fuglhve Exhaust PM25. BIo-0O2 NBIo-0O2To1aICO2 � CH4 �N20 CO2e>� � .-` � _� PM�O .�.�PM10 .Total PM25 PM25 Total. , ,. ,.,R,: �... �. ._..�._: n. �.w._._;. .. .. �, ..._._ .:..�, .,. :..; �, ., � �� Year - � �� tons/yr s_ MT/yr - � t � . : ..,.. , . ..,F,�, _ .,. .e.,. ..._,.��,.. . ..�, ._� , .s ,. ..,,.,. ., r.�.... .ar 2018 � 2.7400e- 0.0246 0.0196 4.00OOe- 3.SOOOe- 1.4500e- 1.8100e- 9.0000� 1.4000e-f 1.5000e- 0.0000 32716 3.2716 4.9000e- 0.0000 32839 j; 003 005 004 003 OW ; 005 003 { 003 � 004 Maxlmum 2.7400e- 0.0246 0.0196 4.00OOe- 3.SOOOe- 7.4500e- 1.8100e- 9.00OOe- 7.4000e- 1.SOOOe• 0.0000 32716 3.2716 4.9000a- 0.0000 3.2839 003 005 004 003 003 005 003 003 004 Mitigated Construction � ROG�. NOx ; CO S02 �FugiLve Exhaust PM10 Fugihve Exhaust PM2 5 i &o-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total C07- CH4 �N20 CO2e' .'. , ` � � .,�. PM1� �PM1D Totel PM25r PM2;5 Tata(�. . ; ;.. .,._ -, ', .. .�. ., . �..:� , .,� . . „ .�._, , .,,. .. ... .. '* f Year - _ r tanstyr MTtyr � , : ' �.�:,. � _; . . � , ,. ;. .... ...: .. . ..... .. ._ .. .. ..��.... ,... ..�� ., .,. _r-. . . ....�.. t �.� .. � ;e ;�- ' -. 20'IB 2.7400e- 0.0246 0.0196 4.00OOr 3.5000e- 1.4500e- 1.8100e- 9.0000� 1.4000e-7 1.5000e- 0.0000 32716 3271fi '4.90�Or �0.0�00 32839 ii 003 005 004 � 003 003 � 005 003 � 003 r � ( i 004 Maximum 2.7400e- 0.0246 0.0196 4.00OOe- 3.SOOOe- 1.4500e- �.8'IOUe- 9.00OOe- �AOOOe- '1.5000e- 0.0000 3.27'I6 3.2776 4.9000e- 0.0000 3.2839 003 0�5 004 003 003 005 003 003 004 - ROG� NOx,"' CO :; S02 ��Fugilive -Exhaust PM703 Fugl4ve Exhaust PM25` 910-0O2 NBio-0O2:TopICO2 ��CH4 � �N20 CO2e�'� � � � � � � ' :� PM10 PM10 7offiI PM25 PM25 Tofef .i:rv..... ..-�...- . ..... .' . ..... ... �..- z.. ... _:.. ..>_.: .... ... .. :`.t .. . ?,.�::, Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � 0.00 0.00 0.00 r 0.00 0.00 Reductlon , QuaAer; "�t'Start Date �' .'�End Date ''�. Mexlmum;Unmftlgeted-ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Mexlmum,Mlligated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) ��'� ,.,. ..._... . . .. .._ . ... .. _.... . ._ . _ .,. . . _ __. ,.. ,...... . ._ . Highest 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name ' Phase Type Start Date End Date Num�Days Num Days Phase Descnption �Number '; ,. Week _ ., .. . ... �_ .... ._� ...,.-.._ . .__., _.... , .,,... ._. , � � ,._ . . ..,., � .._ , ..._ > .,._ 1 Demolition Demolitlon 1011l2018 10/8/2018 5 6 Acres of Grading(Site Preparation Phase):0 Acres of Grading(Grading Phase):0 Acres of Paving:0 Residential Indoor:0;Residential Outdoor:0;Non-Residential Indoor:0;Non-Residential Outdoor:0;Striped Parking Area:0 OffRoad Equipment ; Phase Name "; Offroad Equipment Type:'. Amount ' Usage Hours" Horse Power Load Factoc:`i _ ,. ,._,,. . �t . . . . � _,� .,.,.. �, �. .. � _.. . .. ...., , �.... . ..... .... . ...... _... . .. ., , . ... .... Demolition �Concretellndustrial5aws 1� 8.00� 81 0.7 Demolition `RubberTired Dozers � 0 O.00I 247� 0.40 � Demolition (Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes � 1 6.00I 97� 0.3 Demolition Cranes 1 1� 2.00� 231 0.29 Trins and VMT Phase:Name ' , OffroadEguipment .WorkerTnp;; VendorTrip Hauling:;Tnp WorkerTnp iVendorTnpr Hauling;Trip Workei:Vehicle; �. Ventlor"', Hauling;� � � Count Number ^ Number Number Length Length Length Class �Vehicle ` Uehicle_.`: _� � ; _ , � 1. ` _: ss+;::� ; . .. ..,. . ... ..,�.., ., .. � . �.. .,.__ . ....:: , _ ,:;-: ,._.:. :. Class Cla Demolitian 3, 8.00 2.00) 6.00I 14.70� 6.90� 20.00�LD_Mix � iHDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition-2018 Unmiti4ated Construction On-Site �'"" " ' '" ROG-- �,�NOx"' � CO '�r S02--. 'Fugitne:`��Exhaush' PM70 .Fugitive �6chaust PM2:5� Bio-CO2�'NBIo-�CO2:Total G02 t CH4�.�� "�"N20'"^�CO2e� �!.; i:PM70 :;PM70 Totel PM25 � PM2��5 Totel� �'-� ., �. ,.,�.. .._. ,... .. �� _ . .... .r_ t' ,- Category.,. . ..... . ,. ,. .i . .L �?.: 'tons/yr. . . ..... _.. 'MT/y{ ... ._. , , :. �, ��:� ,,. c<r' . ....n.,�n- .,� �. , .r .�,. b O(i-Road 2.5800e- 0.0228 0.0183 '3.00OOe-+� � 7.4400e- 1.4400e- 1.3900e- 1.3900e- 0.0000 2.6464 � 2.6464 4.5000e-� 0.0000 2.6576 003 005 003 003 003 I 003 � 004 Total 2.SBOOe- 0.0228 0.0783 3.00OOe- 7.4400e- 1.4400e- 1.3900e- 1.3900e- 0.0000 2.6464 2.6464 4.5000e- 0.0000 2.657fi 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Unmitiaated Construction Off-Site ,..- ,'... - ..'�ROG�.- :-.'NOx'�: CO..':� S02 r�;FugNve',��Exhaust :'�P..M70 �Fugitive "6ihausl P,.M2.5, Bio-CO2.NBio-W2+Total CO2'� CH4'��;.��N2 "'G 2e"; :;, ',- . . . .. . �- � . '.� t�� " �� .:.., PM10 � � PM10 Total PM25 PM2.5 3 Totel,: ' -.:�. -,.,;. - .,... �� a'. �.;� ,.. ._ ... .,� ��. _. ..� ..-.: �. .... �._.�.� _.. ...... ._. �. . .._,-.,;.__. ._. .....::. .. ..�:..,. �... . � ; ,;:.,: Category:.� _ tons/yr.� - "MTlyr _.. .. _...:... .. .. .... . .,�... . .......... .._�, _.... ..... .... >...:.._.. , .,_.� ._ .,.. ., ..•...... .......:__ .. . ..: .., . . . ..., ...,.. _ .. ._._. ... .,... . ... Hauling 3.00OOe- 9.7000e-�2.2000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 0.0000 6.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 2.ODOOe-1 0.0000 0.2354 02354 3.00OOe- O.00OD 0.2360 005 004 � 004 005 005 005 � 005 � � 005 Vendor 2.00�Oe- 7.3000e- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 4.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOa 2.00OOe- 0.0000 �+ 0.1478 0.1478 1.00OOe- 0.0000 D.1481 � 005 � 004 �! 004 � � 005 OUS 005 005 005 � 005 � ! � 005 � Warker i 1.1000e-i B.00OOe-�9.00OOe-� 0.0000 I 2.fi000e- O.00QO 2.7000a 7.00OOa- 0.0000 � 7.0�0�05 e-; 0.000� i 02420 � 02420 ��005�I 0.0000 02422 i ooa ! oos ooa ooa ooa aos Total 1.6000e- '1.7800e- 1.3200e- O.00OU 3.SOOOe- 7.00OOe- 3.7000e- 9.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.'IOOOe- O.00OD 0.6252 0.6252 5.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6263 004 003 D03 004 005 004 005 005 004 005 Mitiaated Construction On-Site ;�•�' ��•�'� 5 � ROGr: NOx-�;`. -�CO�;�� S02 "�:p'Fugl6ve °;Exhaust .,';PM10.� ,�Eugitive> Exhaust PM2:5, Bio.CO2 NBIo-�G02 Tofal CO2�' CH4 �-.'�,N20 �;"CO2e,�� , % PM10; '<�PM10 , -7otsl� ?�:PM25 2M2:5 ,:Toteli '..t �`.'`� � „ •.'. ' . ._. �.. � - - . . -. . . .� , -� ; _.-- _.,-' '„_ , , :... .... .. ;..i._.:. _.. .... _ ...-, .. .. _.... ... _-.. ._. __ ... a�,�, ," Category,' ,._•....; <., -;. .�_f... ._ .,......• tons/yc, � . - �.MTtyr �.._. ,,,.>,.,...,. .,..t,..: ,.. .,..,,. .<. .,,... .,.,.. .,... ... _..<.. .. _...,... .. ....... ... ........ .�...,.:,.. .�., ...:.m_ . -.....� .,....,:. . ,. ......:._.,. . _.:. .,..:. OR-Road � 2.58�03 e-i OA220 � 0.0183 I 3.00 50�I `' 0 3oB �' 03�I � ' OW�' '30 30e-� 0.0000 i 2.6464 i 2.6464 4•004� 0.0000 2.6576 Total 2.SBODe- 0.0228 0.0783 3.00OOe- 7A400e- '1.4400e- 7.3900e- 1.3900e- 0.0000 2.64fi4 2.fi464 4.5000e- 0.0000 2.6576 OU3 005 003 003 003 003 004 Mitiaated Construction OffSite . ROG: NOx�` ,�,CO "� 502-.-�';FugNve,;,;6chaust �j�-PM10 =�Fugihve Exhaust P.M2:5 BIo-0O2 NBIo-.0O2 TotaICO2�� CH4 +�==N20 ��",CO2e". ' PM70 _-,�PM10 ;Totat .��PM25 PM2:5 Tota(q - Category, i tons/y� 7 "a 'MTlyr ' y�� .r/ f ,v.l ,^' .."' ! �.'� ,.,. ,' ' ..�. ..:...i .,. _�. .. . ... _ ... . .....:. . .. ......�.. ...._.... . . ..._:__ .....�..� .. C_ ...�.... . ,. __.x_. . ..a.�. ... .. n .. ......... . �..._._.... ....r.. ._... t.. Hauling ' 3.00OOe- 9.70o0e-'22000e-' 0.0000 S.00OOe-' 0.0000 6.00OOe-`1.00OOe-' 0.0000 i 2.00OOe- 0.0000 02354 02354 3.0000�` 0.0000 ' 02360 � 005 I 004 � 004 0�5 005 � 005 f 005 ( I 005 � Vendor ! Z��005 e- 7.30�0�e-`•2.0�0�Oe- 0.0000 4.0�0 SOe- 1.0�0 SOe- 4.00 50�!ff'0005� ' 0050�+ Z o005� 0.0000 � 0.1478 0.1478 1.O�O�SOe-� 0.0000 0.1481 Worker ( 1.1000e-I 6.0000��9.00OOe- 0.0000 2.6000e- 0.0000 2.7000e-!7.00OOe- 0.0000 I 7.00OOe- 0.0000 02420 i 02420 1.OQ0�05 e-� 0.0000 I 02422 fl ooa I oos I oaa ooa I oaa I oos Z ( oos � Total 1.6000e- 1.7900e- 7.3200e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 1.00OOe- 3.7000e- 9.00OOe- 7.00OOe- 7.7000e- 0.0000 0.6252 D.6252 S.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6263 OD4 003 003 004 OUS 004 005 005 004 005 CaIEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 1 Date:8/30/2018 4:17 PM 0404.0014 City of Orange Billboard Construction-Orange County,Annual 0404.0014 City of Orange Billboard Construction Orange County,Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage -- LantlUses " "", ;. S�ze "` „` Metnc LotAcreage , FloorSurfaceArea Population "� �'i - , . . � ., ..��_�.... . _ . ,.: . .. . _ ,�..,�. .:,� ,..��.:. � ._.::�. 1 User Defined Industrial 1 1.00 ! User Defined Unit 0.01 25.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2018 Utility Company Southem Califomia Edison CO21ntensity 702.44 CH4lntensity 0.029 N201ntenslty 0.006 (Ib1MWhr) (IbIMWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments&Non-Default Data Project Characteristics-Construction only Land Use-Construction only Construction Phase-Billboard construction will take approximately 2-4 weeks to complete. Off-road Equipment-Estimated construction equipment Off-road Equipment-Estimated construction equipment Trips and VMT-Additional worker trips and vendor trips added to the building constru�tion phase to account for the delivery of materials. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation- { Table Name Column Name� - + Default Value NewNalue t_._.� ...., .� ....� _. . .. . ._ . ____. _. _ .._.. .. ... . .. .. .._.. . , ..._. . . . __. . . _ tblConstEquipMitigation I NumberOfEquipmenlMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmenlMitlgated 0.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 20.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 0.00 25.00 thlLandUse LotAcreage 0.00 0.01 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnifAmount 2.00 � 0.00 , tblTripsMdVMT � VendorTripNumber 0.00 � 2.00 tblTripsMdVMT WorkerTripNumber � 0.00 8.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitiqated Construction r`� ROG;' NOx'�-" CO � 502 ��FugiLve �_Fxhaust PM70 F FugiLve F�chaust PM2 5, Blo-CO2 NBIo-CO2 fTotal CO2 : CH4 �'N20 .0O2e�. " `� � �- -'�; � PM10 � �'PM10 � Totel PM25 PM25 Totel` .r,. . ...-,. ;, - , . ��:� ..:�,�. ,. ,,. �.r.... .. ... ....,.:. . _ . .... . ...:. �..�.=i...�. ..�.:m� . .:._..., ...> _:... ,,, . .. ,:.: .. . _,'.....,�.�..:.. .._..},..::.,... �.:; � Year;- , Srons/yr MTlyr 2018 ,.. I( 4.003 e-� 0.0486 i�0.0254 j 5.0005 e`�1.0003 e i Z 003 e- 3•4003 e- 2.70��e-(2.2003�i 2.5�2�03 e-i 0.0000...4� 4.9793 � 4.9793, �.� 003 e-I 0.0000 (.�5.0095 1 j � i � Maximum 4.6400e- 0.0486 0.0254 5.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.4400e- 3.4500e- 2.7000e- 2.2500e- 2.5200e• 0.0000 4.9793 4.9793 1.2100e- 0.0000 5.0095 OD3 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 003 Mitiqated Construction ROG��, NOx+�:� CO 502 1!'Fugitive .Exhaust PM10 Fugilive ExNaust PM2�5' BIo-�CO2� NBIo-CO2.Total CO2. CH4 "�:xN20 y i CO2e.�? ��; �.� ��PM70 -,PM10 � Totel PM25 PM2b Totel� .: ,, ;, r : . .._. . .._...�, ,.�_.... . ..:-, . . _. .. . :. .. .. .�. . _ ... ,. ._:..... ._ ... . .._._ .. 4. � ,� Year " ' � .� tonslyr ;� MT/yf r , , ; �: ._.� , .��. _,_...,,. .�, . . . .�.... .. . ,-�. ... ...�:�...... .. �-:, � �. :�. . .. .. . .. .. . .."-.. ......_ _... ,... . ,..__.,....... . .. . ...«._ ..... .. ... .._..... _.. 2018 I 4.6400e- 0.0486 1 0.0254 � 5.00OOe- 1.00OOe-1 2.4400e- 3.4500e-I 2.7000e-I 2.2500e-! 2.5200e-i 0.0000 € 4.9792 i 4.9792 �12700e-I 0.0000 I 5.0095 �� OD3 � � � 005 I 003 � 003 I 003 � 004 � 003 1 003 � ' � � 003 � � Maximum 4.6400e- 0.0486 0.0254 S.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.4400e- 3.4500e- 2.7000e- 2.2500e- 2.5200e- 0.0000 4.9792 4.9792 7.2700e- 0.0000 5.0095 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 0�3 ; ROG NOx * CO S02 -Fugltiva Exhaust PM70 Fugi�ve Exhaust PM2¢ Bio-0O2'NBio-002 TatatCO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e�` .:��. . �7, +';; PM10 _.PM70 Total PM2 5 PM2 5 Totel�� . .. .,.,...�:.., . .,-..:... ,... ..:.... . ,,.... .. �:.:.. ..... ,_r�. . --,� I. , ± ! � f, si Pe�cent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � o.00 o.00 o.00 o.00 P o.ao � o.00 `o.00 o.00 o.00 ReducGon '�-' quarter, �_�StartDate'�-� --� EndDate ��, MaxlmumUamWgated:ROG+NOX�(tonalquaRer) MaxlmumMltlgatetlROG+NOX(tanslquarter);'� (' - . .. ... .. . ..._ . ... .. , , � .-_,. . . ..... ...._........ . . ,. ...... ,. . ...._ ..._.., .... ... ._..... ... ..... .. ...... ... Hlghest 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase 'Phase , "`"'" R,hase Name'" �:: FhaSe Type,; ` -$tart Date. ,; End,Date Num Days Nurri:Days ;` Phase:Descnption;","s: Number J� s Week .a t. + 1 Building Construction Building Construction 10/1@018 10/26/2018� 5� 20 Acres of Grading(Site Preparation Phase):0 Acres of Grading(Grading Phase):0 Acres of Paving:0 Residential Indoor:0;Residential Outdoor:0;Non-Residential lndoor:0;Non-Residential Outdoor:0;Striped Parking Area:0 OffRoad Equipment '' Phase Name O,ffroad EqWpment Type: Amount -. Usage Hours � Horse Power Load Factor '• ,..,�.,: .. .... :::..._._ ._.`_ . ... ..�... .., ,�:�� .. _ ,...:;... � .,�: .._.�.� . �i ' Building Construction �Cranes � 1� 4.00� � 231I 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.2 Building Construction �Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes I 0� 8.00� 97I 0.3 Trias and VMT Phase,Name : OffroadEguipment '.Workerl'rip, �VendocTrip Hauling,Tnp Worke,rTnp, ;YendorTrip� Haulfng,Trip .Worker:Vehicle Uendor": Hauling..:" �( ` Count Number . Number Number Length Length Length Class Veh�cie ' Vehicle`; `;:. Class Class, . .. ., . ... . . .- ,. .. ,. . , ,:, r, __._ �, ,. .,.. �., ._.�.x ..,. ., , ... ..., .w .._.. r � . . . . „_: Building Construction 2 B.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix �HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Building Construction-2018 Unmlti4ated Construction On-Site '' �� " ROG; NOz�,:' CO.�y',- 502 •'�FugiWe i Exhaust.'"BM10 -FuglWe Exheust PM2;5, Blo-CO2 NBIo-CO2 Total CO2 :� CH4: c:N20 '�"'CO2e;.; .. , '�'�PM1,0 ":PM10 .��.,Tolal' : PM25 .PM2:5 " TolaG+ . � . . .. . . .. . _ .. . , . ,... ... .: Cale o -. -... . . _ .-. .B�'.'` ..> �` ...�� :�z �'' ; , tonslyr„ .r;�,,: �, , -,'_. '..�". .�,i'�' :MTlyr . . , . � ., - .. ,. _ . , ,..... ..... ........._ . , . .,_�., i�.. .... ..,.... ., ...,......_. .,,_�,.u: . _:„. _.. . _.. ._ .,.... .,.....,... _ ._. . ... ._..,., ..�.�...,.,...._ ._ ., ...._ _ . ..,..: Oft-Road ( 4�1003 e-� 0.0459 i 0.0217 � 4�005� `Z 003��Z 40 30�j � � Z 20 30�I 2 003�I 0.0000 3 3 6799 � 3.6799 I L QO3 e-� 0.0000 � 37095 i . Total 4.1900e- 0.0459 0.0217 4.00OOe- 2A200e- 2.4200e- 22200e- 2.2200e- 0.0000 3.6799 3.6799 1.7500e- 0.0000 3.7085 003 OU5 003 003 003 003 003 Unmiti4ated Construction Off-Site ' � r "'�� : ROG„ ;NOx�.- CO;;,,:� S02 ;r;Fugltive:�.�Exhaust.�..PM1D . .?FugiGve Ex,haust PM2:5"" BIo-.0O2 NBfa G02 T �';yN2 o e% „ � ' ° �PM10'� ' PMW �; Tofal BM25. .`PM2:5 �Yote�l'-' ; � � �.. .. _... . ...: ., . .. ,.,�:_ .�.... _ . ., ;;' Cetegory.,' ; ..,.: .;. -; . _.:� ,. .,, tonslyC -,,.... .� .,._.,,e - �;.MTlyr 't , . " ,. , ` .�..�. , r .;.. � ' .. � ,.;.- .::� >:�,. � �k .c 1:�. .. .' .. : ' ... ...,,, .:.. ...t .. ,, ��..., . . .. , ... .r.....�....� . -. ... .. Hauling � 0.0000 D.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 t 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000� Vendor � B.00OOe-� 2.4400e-�6.7000e-1 7.00OOe- 1.3000e-�2.00OOe-�1.4000e-�4.00OOe-�2.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 � 0.4927 i 0.4927 4.00OOe-� 0.0000 � 0.4938 005 003 �I 004 j 005 004 DOS 004 � 005 005 005 � ' � 005 1 ' ( � � � � � � 005 � � Worker 3.6000e- 2.7000e-tI2.9900e-i 7.00OOe- B.BOOOe- 1.00OOe- B.BOOOe- 2.3000e- 1.00OUe- 2.4000r 0.0000 0.8067 j 0.8067 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.8072 � 004 004 1 003 , 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 , , i Total 4AOOOe- 2.77000- 3.66000- 2.00OOe- 1.0100e• 3.00OOe- 1.0200e- 2.7000e- 3.00OOe• 2.9000e- 0.0000 7.2993 '1.2993 6.00OOe- 0.0000 1.3070 004 OU3 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitinated Constructlon Onsite �'� "."'.�. :ROG,; NOx�.�, CO{;.�� S02 :�a�.FugiWe.;�Exheust ^'FM70 .��Fugitrve ,Exhaust PM2:5' ,BIaiCO2 NBIo-'CO2'sTohaICO2�� CH4r � �::N20 .'-'�CO2e:�� ' ' - ":,PM70', ��'.PM10 ��'i6tai '.:PM25 PM2.5 Total�., ' '-'i . � Category.• . , tonslyr-�. :MT/yr ._ .�.. .. ... .. :..�. ....... :a_ � .._��.'-- . �. ._. .,>_. . .. .._a ..,._..�< . .:r.. _..., �.._ .. ....... .. . .0 . ...._ . . . . . .._ .ti�. Off-Road , 4.1900e 0.0459 � 0.0217 4.00OOe-i 2.4200e-�2.4200e- �2.2200e-� 22200r 0.0000 3.67995� 3.6799 �� 1.1500e-� 0.0000 3.7085 1� 003 I I ( 005 ( � 003 I 003 I I 003 � 003 i � I � 003 I � Total 4.1900e- 0.0459 0.0217 4.00OOe- 2.4200e- 2.4200e- 22200e- 2.2200e- �.0000 3.fi799 3.6799 1.'1500e- 0.0000 3.7085 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 Mitiaated Construction Off-Site ��' ..;;'�� ROGf ''NOx�� "CO^" S02.-�'�•�FugitiVe.'Exhaust`�:r'-PM70 �:-FuglWe.�•F�haust :PM2.5�' B(o-,CO2 NBIa'E02�,Total CO21.?� CH4.' "'�.N20_:"'-W2e"�. � �� -.; .� .s '� � .�- PM70 -'�PM10 Total PM2 5 PM2 5 Total.' r �� . �, ... y 'r ..... ,. . .a.. .:,. . . ... ..„ .: „ .. i` Calegory�; . . .. ..,, .. _.. ;._;. i:;" ':tonslyn _.._... ___.... . ._. ,...MT/yf ._. . ... , ��:.�.� . .. .�,.. ... . . .. . _.. _ .. ,.__. ... .. .... .., � .. ... . ,.,.. . .._.,.,. . ,.- ., ..._._<. . .. .. .. , ._. ... Hauling � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 O.00OD ! O.00OD 0.0000 � 0.00�0 � 0.0000 � D.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � � Vendor + B.00OOe- 2.4400a 6.7000e- 1.00OOe- 1.3�OOe- 2.00OOe- 1.4000e- 4.00OOe- 2.00OOe-t S.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4927 0.4927 4.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4938 I� 005 003 � 004 OD5 004 a�5 � 004 005 ( 005 � 005 � I � 005 � I �i E ! � � Worker f I 3�004� 2.70��e-i 2.9�9 30e- 1 A�0 SOe-I 8.80��e- 1 A�0 SOe-I 8.004 e-I 2.004 e-I 1.005 e-� 2.4�0�e- 0.0000 � 0.8U67 I 0.8067 �2.0�0 50e-I 0.0000 � O.BW2 � Total 4.4000e- 2.7100e- 3.6600e- 2.00OOe- 7.0700e- 3.00OOe- 7.0200a- 2.7000e- 3.00OOe- 2.9000e• 0.0000 1.2993 12993 6.00OOe- 0.0000 1.3070 004 003 003 005 003 005 OU3 004 005 004 005 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area 3.2 Building Construction-2018 Unmiti4ated Construction On-Site ��_�� - - ) ROG;'. NOx;':�,- � CO ';; 502� ,�,r'�Fugitrva', .;ExhausC;'P.M70�� FugiWe Exhaust PM2�5; BIo-�;CO2,NBIo;;CO2 Total COT�=' CH4' :'^N20 �:�,G02e_�.; ' `�� ` �` --�PM10 PM10 ToFal PM2 5 PM2 5 Tofai: - i:: �4 t_ s` .�<:� Category:�re :.,.i .... .;r -A- ton � .�MTlyr ce ,.. _. ..- '- 1_...,: . .. . .._.-,,.. r.. ..:_. ._ ,. ..�_ .,,, _ :_. . ..:,:. > , , ..._ _..:_. .... . .... .. .: . ......... � . ,..:.,.... OR-Roatl �� 4��003�I 0.0459 � 0.0217 4.0005� Z 4003 0 Z 4 03 B � �Z 0030e-�2.O�OOe-� 0.0000 � 3.6799 � 3.6799 ��003 e- 0.0000 3.7085 Total 4.'1900e- 0.0459 0.0217 4.00OOe- 2.4200e- 2AZOOe- 2Z200e- 22200e- 0.0000 3.6799 3.6799 7.7500e- 0.0000 3.7085 003 ODS OU3 OU3 OD3 003 003 Unmitiaated Construction Off�ite ""-" ':.�i ''ROGf; NOx�".� CO "�:� S02 •'� _ `�FugiUve�� eExhaust =PM70 FuglWe 'Exhaust PM2 B� BIo-�E02=NBIo-.0O2 iTotal W2�r CH4 .:`N20 "CO2e�"� a , -�; : i '�. -: PM10 -PM70 Total PM25 PM2-5° Total��; '.r � , . k ,.,�. . .r:� e .._ �_. ....� y.o. . -.� ,w. ,.- „. � } _. 'i .. i� .� ...7. .. _...._ a,.._ , .. Z.. �/.,, ..'-. ._'2... „ ...,,,' d . . . �M '1 .`,Cetegory:�� s�` �lon,s/yr - MT/yr - _ � - .,....,,_ . ..., . ......_.. �...�.... . ... ............ . .. . ... ....:.... . . ...... ....._„' '.....-... .,...�:.....�.. :. . ......: ., v, ..:.._. ..._:. ,.,.. ,..�.�. ,. �..,..__...., Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.00OD Vendor � B.00OOe- 2.4400e- 6.7000a 1.00OOe-I 1.3000e- 2.00OOe- 1.4000e-I 4.00OOe- 2.00OOa(S.00OOe- 0.0000 � 0.4927 � 0.4927 4.00OOe-I 0.00�0 0.4938 Worker 3.6000e- 2JOOOe- 2.9900e- 1.00OOe- B.BOOOa I 1.00OOe- 8.80 Oe- 2.OOOe- 1.0 OOe- 2.4000e- 0.0000 } 0.8067 I 0.8067 2.DOOa O.00OD 0.8072 �, 004 004 � 003 005 I 004 I 005 OD4 I 004 � 005 ( 004 � I 005 ( Tatal 4.4000e- 2.7100e- 3.6600e- 2.00OOe- 1.Ot00e- 3.00OOe- 1.0200e- 2.7000e- 3.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 1.2993 1.2993 6.00OOe- 0.0000 1.3010 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitiqated Constructlon On-Site - ROG� NOx" CO.,:'"-; 502--��`" :�FuglWe ;Exhaust �:"'PM10�"�!Fugitive Exhaust �P,M2.5. BIo-'CO2 NBIo,'CO2 TotaICO2:" CH4r ;�:'N20"'",':CO2eT`-: , . � - % PM70. `��'_PM10 :i'�Total �. .pM25 `PM2.5 ,Total;: r ,..� .... .,��-. , ,.� . _. -.... ,... �_. . ..r � � .. - '- . �.. .. . ., . _.. ...._ . ... '...;- .. �`....._.. ._, -;.�. ,_:�.... . �,. , .. .. - � . . .;., . ... . .. .. ....�. �..�.'�...:... ..�:.- �'� �I E;.._ . �..,..,r..,.,:, .,.. Category;.. � „, .,.s , . ._. k .'_.,. ,-tonslyr ._ ;:_ . .." - `>MT/yr. - _ i:�� ' .' s, ..� � `, .t � .;F? ni t �... .,�... . .. . ... ... .. ... . ..... .r,_ ..._ . -,... �... ._.F.. .��....., _ ... ... . . . a, v � ... .. _.. . . .,,.. _.... ._.., OH-Raad � 4��003�I 0.0459 � 0.0217 I 4.00 50�I �Z 003�I Z 003�� I Z 003�� Z 003�I 0.0000�i 3.6799 I 3.6799 �'003�� 0.0000 ( 3.7085 � ToWI 4.7900e- 0.0459 0.0217 4.00OOe- 2A200e- 2.4200e- 222000- 2.2200e- 0.0000 3.6799 3.6799 1.7500e- 0.0000 3.7085 003 005 003 003 � 003 003 003 Mitiqated Construction Off-Site ROG� NOx?'; ��-CO;' `, S02'.�.:FugiWe�,r-F�dtausl '�PM70' FugiUve :Exhaust �PM2:5. BIo,.0O2 NBIo-:CO2 TataI;.0O2;; CH4 �"��N20'��-CO2e;' ,, -,t � PM10 `.PM10 `�Total PM25 P.M2:5 To1aI�T f .,.. .. �, . , , :, ....,�..... , ._m,. �� - � ��- K. ��-_ Category.- .-. r tanstyr. =MTlyf z 3 '� . �. ...... ..... .. . . .. . . �..,.. .._._ ... ::._. _ __ .,. ...� . :. -._.. .. ,:.-.,. ...._ .., ... . ,. ,....-.. - . _. _ ..«.... . Hauling � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000�� 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � O.00OD 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000�� 0.0000 0.0000 � Vendor B.00OOe- 2.4400e- 6.7000e- i.0000e- 7.3000e-`2.00OOe- 1.4000e- 4.ODOOe-i 2.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4927 0.4927 4.00OOe-� O.00OD 0.4938 005 003 004 005 OD4 005 004 005 I 005 005 005 t i � � Warker 3.6000e- 2.7000e-`2.9900e- 1.00OOe- B.BOOOa-7.00OOe- B.BOOOe- 2,3000a 1.00OOe- 2.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.8067 O.B067 2.00OOe- O.00OD D.8072 � ( II o04 I o04 ! 003 005 a� ( 005 1 0� I o� I o05 0� ; oos I i Total 4.4000e- 2.7100e- 3.6600e- 2.00OOe- 1.0100e- 3.00OOe- 1.0200e- 2.7000e- 3.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 12993 12993 6.00OOe• 0.0000 '1.3070 OU4 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Appendix D: City of Orange Pending Land Use Applications THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Pending Land Use Applications as of September 27, 2018 The table below contains a list of the active land use applications in the City. To find a specific location,the second col umn is organized alphabetically by street. Please feel free to contact the case planner if you have any questions regarding the project. ff you have general questions, please call 714-744-7220. Casetype abbreviations: AA—Administrative Adjustment GPA—General Plan Amendment TPM—Tentative Parcel Map ADR—Administrative Design Review MJSP—Major Site Plan TTM—Tentative Tract Map CUP-Conditional Use Permit MNSP—NTinor Site Plan VAR—Variance DRC—Design Review SLP—Sober Living Facility Permit ZC—Zone Change ENV—Environmental - �. o. �-- Orange Packing Almond DRC 4890-16 &MNSP 0889-16 Marissa Moshier 1/5/2017 2"d SMART review on House, LLC Avenue W.426 A proposal to demolish a shed and construct (714)744-7243 3/21/18. 2nd Comment letter parking lot impro�,ements on a historic packing mmoshier(a�cityoforange.org provided to applicant. house site Harmony Batavia Street CUP 3059-17 Monique Schwartz 12/14/17 Incomplete Letter sent on Funeral N.1422 A proposal to operate funeral and cremation (714)744-7224 1/2/18 Services services within an existing industrial building. mschwartzCa�cityoforange.org Receipt of reHsed floor plan pending. Application withdrawn on 2/27/18 McGloghlon Batavia Street CUP 3014 Monique Schwartz 5/6/16 2"d Submittal recei�ed building N.1081 Office area in excess of 25% (714)744-7224 7/12/16 mschwartz(a�cityoforanae.org Meeting with applicant on 8/3/17 Meeting with applicant on 11/28/17 ReHsed plans receieed on 1/11/18 Incomplete Letter sent on 1/23/18 Revised plans receieed 2J13/18 • 1 .. • . - •-_ , . Revised plans recei�ed 2/12/18 Planning Commission approval recei�ed on 7/2/18 15�Check Building Plans reviewed on 7/24/18 Nat Automotive Batavia Street DRC 4934-18 &MNSP 0933-18 Vidal F.Marquez 1/5/18 Incomplete letter sent Remodel N.1223 Construct addition and remodel existing (714)744-7214 3/8/18 industrial building for automotioe repair vmarquezl�cityoforange.or4 Salas Cellars, Batavia Street CUP 3068-18 Vidal F.Marquez 4/3/17 PC approeed 7/2/18 LLC N.1975 Request to operate a small winery.ABC License (714) 744-7214 Type 02. �rtnarquez(�cityoforange.org WalterFroemke Brenna W.419 MNSP 0862 Monique 5chwartz 6/9/16 Revised Plans receieed Addition to existing warehouse (714)744-7224 11/21/16. _, mschwartz ancityoforanae.ora SMART approvdl received 11/30/16 Planning Commission approvai recei�ed on 2/22/17 Building Plans for block walls appro�ed by Planning Building Plans appro�ed Planning Final completed on 6/8/18 WalterFroemke Brenna W.420 MNSP 0863 Monique Schwartz 6/9/16 Revised Plans recei�,ed Addition to existing warehouse (714)744-7224 11/21/16. mschwartzCa�cityoforange.org SMART approval receired on 11/30/16 Planning Commission approval receired on 2/22/17 Building Plans for block walis appro�ed by Planning Building Plans appro�ed Planning Final completed on 6/S/18 2 �. . , . ... . . Penn Residence California N. ADR 101-18 Monique Schwartz 6/5/18 CDD Detertnination 212 (714)744-7224 (appro�ral) on 7/9/18 mschwartzla�cityoforanae.om 151 Check Building Plans reviewed on 7/25/18 2"a Check Building Plans reviewed on 8/4/18 Aguiiar Cambridge N. ADR 0107-18 Monique Schwartz 9/11/18 Incomplete Letter sent on Residence 1656 (714)744-7224 9/20/18 A proposal to construct a single story room mschwartzCa�citvoforange.org addition to existing residence. Lamar CenterStreetS. DRC 4947-18 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 6.28.2018 Under review. Residence 432 (714) 744-7223 A proposal for a bedroom and bathroom addition kribuifo@cityoforange.org to an existing single family residence in the Old Towne Historic District. Hydrogen Chapman ADR 0087-17, &MNSP 0918-17 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo S/15/17 Incomplete letter sent " Fueling Station Avenue E.1914 A proposal to construct a hydrogen fueling (714) 744-7223 7/3/2018 station as part of an existing gas station. kribuffo cityoforange.orq T-Mobile Chapman DRC 4926-17, &MNSP 0920-17 Marissa Moshier 8.29.2017 Incomplete letter sent to Avenue E.211 Expansion of an existing wireless facility on the (714) 744-7243 applicant on 9/28. roof of the Elks building from three antennas to mmoshierCa)citvoforange.org Resubmittal on TJ26 under six antennas re�iew. Incomplete letter pro�ided on 3/28/18 ATBT Chapman DRC 4944-18 Marissa Moshier 5.31.2018 Incomplete letter pro�ided Avenue E.211 Installation of two wireless antennas on roof of (714)744-7243 to applicant on 7/2/18 Elks Building mmoshierCa�cityoforange.org JAH Sign Chapman DRC 4953-18 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 9.10.2018 Under review. Avenue E.924 A proposal to construct a new freestanding sign (714) 744-7223 in the Old Towne Historic District. kribuffola�citvoforanae.org 3 .. � . • .�- . . ActivCare Chapman CUP 3056-17, MJSP 0921-17, &DRC 4929-17 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 9/20/17 Approeed by Planning Living Avenue E.2629 A proposal to construct a new 70 bed assisted (714) 744-7223 Commission 5l21/2018, in living facility for memory care patients. kribuftoCa2citvoforanae.ora plan check.Final landscape plan appro�ed by DRC. Verizon Chapman MNSP 0932-17 Vidal F.M�rquez 12/22/17 CDD appro�ed 4/10/18 Wireless Avenue E.3409 Addition of an emergency backup generator to (714) 744-7214 Permit issued 7/26/18 an existing wireless communication facility. vmarquez a(�cityoforanae.ora Home away Chapman CUP 3067-18, DRC. 4940-18 and MNSP 0939- Vidal F.M�rquez 3/29/18 Incomplete letter 5/24118 from Homes Avenue E.4710 18 (714)744-7214 Incomplete letter7/17/18 Request to operate a kennel (boarding facility)in vmarquez@cityoforange.org association with a pet boutique/day spa which provides pet grooming, eeterinary services for cats and dogs, pet merchandise sales and exterior remodel. Casa Teresa Chapman DRC No.4683-13 Marissa Moshier DRC provided comments Avenue E.615 Demolition of an existing duplex and (714) 744-7243 for"preliminary revievJ' on construction of a new 4 unit structure to house mmoshierC�citvoforanae.ora September 18�h,2013 and homeless pregnant women. on June 18,2014. T-Mobile Chapman TUP 217-18 Vidal F.Marquez 2/28/18 Incomplete letter sent Avenue E.8412 Request to construct and operate a temporary (714) 744-7214 7/17/18 wireless communication facility. wnarauezC�cityoforanqe.orq Urth Caffe Chapman DRC 4803-15 Marissa Moshier 5/14/2015 DRC appro�ed on 11/4/15. Avenue W.100 A proposal to rehabilitate a contributing building (714)744-7243 Building permit for in the Plaza Historic District for use as restaurant mmoshier(a�cityoforanqe.org core/shell issued.Revisions and office. to exterior approeed by DRC on 7/20/16 Proposal to change appro�ed exterior paint colors approred by DRC on 12/6/17 4 — .. .- Buttermilk Fried Chapman DRC 4949-18 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 7.3.2018 Incomplete letter sent Chicken Avenue W.238 (714) 744-7223 8/2/2018. Slgnage A proposal to construct a new blade sign for a kributfo(a�citvoforanae.org restaurant in the Old Towne Historic District. Best Western Chapman CUP 3058-17, DRC 4938-17 &MNSP 0928-17 Vidal F.Marquez 11/15/18 Incomplete letter sent Orange Plaza Avenue W. Construction of adding 6 new guest rooms, (714)744-7214 12.22.17 1306 laundry and fitness room and complete exterior wnamuezCa?citvoforange.org remodel. Woody's Diner Chapman DRC 4895-16, MNSP 0894-16, B�AA 0251-16 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 12.22.2016 Incomplete lettersent, Avenue W. A proposal to construct a new restaurant. (714) 744-7223 awaiting applicant 2145 kribuffoCa�cityoforange.org response. 7-11 Gas Station Chapman DRC 4852-16 Vidal F.Marquez DRC approved 9/2017 Avenue W. New proposed 2,400 SF cornenience store (714)744-7214 meeting. 2245 wnarquez@cityoforanqe.orq Plan Check. 4th Review. Chapman Chapman MNSP 0945-18 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 5.29.2018 Incomplete Letter sent on University Avenue W. (714) 744-7223 9/13/2018 PantherVillage 3101 A proposal to construct a new parking lot behind kribuffoCa�citvoforange.org Parking Lot the existing Panther Village student residential community. Orange Chapman TPM No.0008-16, MJSP No.0845-15, DRC No. Robert Garcia 12/14/16 All public comments and Collection Avenue W. 4843-16, &ENV No. 1845-16 (714) 744-7231 agency comments recei�ed 3600 The applicant proposes to construct 277 raa�ia@citvoforenae.ora by May 8�h ha�,e been sent multiple family residential apartment units with to the applicanYs an intemal parking structure and a commercial entironmental consultant. office parking structure to replace existing surface parking. Old Town Chapman MJSP 0788-14, &DRC 4763-14 Marissa Moshier 8/28/14 DRC preliminary reHew Gateway Avenue W.407 A proposal to rehabilitate two contributing (714) 744-7243 conducted on 5/20/15. buildings in the Old Towne Historic District, mmoshier@citvoforanae.org demolish four noncontributing sheds, construct a two-story, 12 unit apartment building, and construct a trash and storage building. 5 �. �. .._ Orange City Blvd West TPM No.0010-16, MJSP No.0847-15, DRC No. Robert Garcia 12/14/16 ProHded Comments to Collection 1 4845-16, 8 ENV No. 1847-16 (714)744-7231 Applicant on February 3ro The applicant proposes to construct 331 raarcia(")a citvoforanae.ora along with potential multiple family residential apartment units with schedule. an intemal parking structure and a commercial o�ice parking structure to replace existing surface parking. Orange City Bivd West TPM No.0011-16, MJSP No.0848-15, DRC No. Robert Garcia 12/14/16 Pro�ided Comments to Collection 1 4846-16, &ENV No. 1848-16 (714)744-7231 Applicant on February 3ro The applicant proposes to construct a 6story rgarcia cityoforange.org along with potential 165-room hotel with surface parking. schedule. T-Mobile City Drive,S. MNSP 0927-17 Vidal F.Marquez 11.12.18 CDD appro�,ed 3.19.18 Rooftop 313 Construct a wireless communication facility on (714) 744-7214 Plan Check submitted Wireless Facility 5-story parking structure screened by FRP 12- �rtnarquez ancityoforanae.ora 4.30.18 foot walls on 4 towers in Pubic Institution zone. Orenge City Parkway TPM No.0009-16, MJSP No.0846-15, DRC No. Robert Garcia 12/14/16 All public comments and Collection 500 8�600 4844-16, &ENV No. 1846-16 (714) 744-7231 agency comments receieed The applicant proposes to construct 213 raarciaCa)citvoforanae.org by May 8�h haee been sent multiple family residential apartment units with to the applicanYs an intemal parking structure and a commercial environmental consultant. office parking structure to replace existing surface parking. Southern Collins Avenue MNSP 0925-17 Vidal F.Marquez 10/25/17 Incomplete letter sent Counties W.1825 Construction of inetal canopy enclosed on three (714) 744-7214 11.22.17 Lubricants sides for parking of�,ehicles and trucks umarquez@citvoforange.org Arrowhead Collins Avenue DRC 0931-17 and MNSP 0926-17 Kelly Christensen Ribuifo 11.1.2017 Under reHew, awaiting Monopole W.2023 A proposal to relocate an existing non-stealth (714) 744-7223 applicant response. Relocation Wireless communications monopole. kributfo@cityoforange.om Calvy CulverAvenue DRC 4938-18 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 2.26.2018 Incomplete Letter sent on Residence E.231 A proposal for reconstruction of a demolished (714)744-7223 5.3.2018. service porch. kribuffol�a citvoforanqe.ora 6 , - .. .� Catlin Culver Culver 585 E. DRC 4952-18 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 9.4.2018 Under review. Street (714) 744-7223 Residence A proposal for modifications to an existing kribuffo@citvoforange.org historic residence in the Old Towne Historic District. � Grace Church Fairhaven 2207 CUP 3016, DRC 4865, &MNSP 0865 Monique Schwartz 6/21/16 Incomplete Letter sent Addition to existing worship center and new (714)744-7224 7/20/16 enclosed sports center mschwartz(")a cityoforange.orq Revised Plans recei�ed 3.14.17 Incomplete Letter sent 3.15.17 Revised Plans receioed 5.23.17 SMART review 5/31/17 Incomplete Letter sent 6/15/17 Revised Plans recei�ed 8/14/17 SMART review 9/6/17 Incomplete Letter sent 9/18/17 Meeting with new applicanYs on 10/2/17 Revised Plans recei�ed 7/30/18 Incomplete Letter sent 8/6/18 Salem Lutheran Frank Lane E. MNSP No. 0934-18 Robert Garcia Planning requesting minor Parking Lot 6337 Proposed parking lot on the site of the former (714)744-7231 revisions to re�ised set of Fowler House, as part of Phase I to construct r.yarcia citvoforange.org plans prior to scheduling for new preschool building. SMART review. The Courtyard Glassell Street DRC No.4924-17, &MNSP No. 0916-17 Marissa Moshier 7.25.17 Comment letter provided to N.141 A proposal to add an elevator tower and a new (714) 744-7243 applicant on 12/13/17 exterior stair and rehabilitate the rear elevation mmoshier(a�citvoforange.org of a historic commercial building in the Plaza Historic District. 7 o. • . • �-_ � . LetnerRoofing Glassell Street ADR No.100-18 and MNSP No.0944-18 Tiftany Chhan 5/1/18 Under review. Pending N.1490 A proposal to install a new prefabricated metal 714-744-7272 Applicant resubmittal. storage building (40' x 80') to hold equipment tchhanCa2cityoforange.org SMART review 9-5-18 and protect from elements. Paving for new Corrections sent. parking area. SimplySelf Glassell Street MJSP 0871-16, 8�DRC 4871-16 Monique Schwartz 8/2/16 Revised Plans recei�ed Storage N.1600 A proposal to demolish three existing buildings (714)744-7224 10/11/16. - and construct a 156,654 sq. ft., three-story mschwartz@_cityoforanae.ora SMART review 10/19/16 industrial building to be utilized as a self-storage Incomplete Letter sent facility with related on-site impro�,ements. 10/31/16 Revised Plans recei�ed 11/21/16 SMART review 11/30/16 Incomplete Letter sent 12/9l17 SMART reHew 1/4/17 DRC 2/15/17 Revised Plans receieed 2.28.17 DRC 3/15/17 Community Concems Recei�ed Planning Commission on 4-17-17 4/�7/�7 Project Continued to June 5,2017 PC meeting Planning Commission approred project 6/5/17 15t Check Building Plans with comments completed on 8/30/17 Sign plans recei�ed on 10/3/17 Sign plans appro�ed 11.22.17 Landscape/Irrigation Plans appro�ed 11.27.17 3�d Check Building plans with comments sent 11.22.17 8 .. - . - .- . . - 4�h Check Building Plans appro�ed 11.12.17 Discovery, LLC Glassell Street Parking IoUexterior building modifications Monique Schwartz 6/28/16 2�d Incomplete Letter sent N.2829 (714)744-7224 to applicant on 9/8/16 mschwartzC9�citvoforange.org Inactitity letter sent 11/7/17 On 1/4/17,applicant directed staff to keep file actioe Bruxie Glassell Street DRC No.4921-17 Marissa Moshier 6.23.2017 Application incomplete. N.292 A proposal to remodel a restaurant in the Old (714)744-7243 Comment letter sent on Towne Historic District mmoshier@citvoforange.orq 7/27 Northern Glassell Street DRC No.4933-17 and MNSP 0929-17 Kelly Christensen Ribufto 11.15.2017 Incomplete Letter sent on Gateway N.887 A proposal to construct a new 1865 SF retail (714)744-7223 9/14/2018 Commercial commercial building and relocate a historically kribulfoCa�cityoforange.org Center significant property tothe project site. Glassell Glassell Street TTM 0047-18 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 7.17.2018 Incomplete Letter sent on Acquisitions N.2411 A proposai to subdivide two existing parcels into (714)744-7223 May 16.2018. Partners LLC six total new parcels. kribuffoC�citvoforanae.org Tract Map 9 .. - . � �-� . . Centerpointe Glassell Street CUP No. 3045-17, MJSP No. 0905-17, &DRC Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 4.02.2017 Incomplete Letter sent on Communities S.574 No.4911-17 (714) 744-7223 8/9/2018 Two story assisted living facility for memory care kribuffo@cityoforange.org building containing 51 units. Dang Glasseli Street DRC 4816-15, MNSP 827-15 Marissa Moshier 8/12/2015 DRC preliminary review on Residences S.655 A proposal to demolish an existing single family (714) 744-7243 12/16/15. residence and construct se�,en new units on a mmoshier@cityoforange.org property in the Old Towne Historic District. Parkridge Goldenrod MNSP 0951-18 Tiffany Chhan 7l26/18 SMART retiew complete Community Lane E.6018 A proposal to install a barrier artn gate system in (714) 744-7272 recommended approval. To Association front of the existing gate system. tchhan _citvoforange.org drafl approval letter Posting period to begin on 9/12/18. CDD will make decision on September 24�h Bollinger Grand Street N. DRC 4870-16 Marissa Moshier S/1/2016 Resubmittal on 10/24. Carport 287 A proposal to pertnit a carport in the Old Towne (714) 744-7243 Under review. Historic District mmoshierCa)cityoforanae.ora Helen Nguyen Grant Street N. DRC 4959, MNSP 0860 Monique Schwartz 5/13/16 Incomplete Letter sent 131 New duplex (714)744-7224 8/16/16 mschwa�tz@cityoforange.org Revised plans receieed 1/4/17 Incomplete Letter sent 1/19/17 SMART 2/15/17 Incomplete Letter sent 2.27.17 Inactivity letter sent on 11/7/17 Appiicant directed stafr to keep file actioe MS Intemational Grove Avenue MJSP No. 0897-17, &DRC No.4899-17 Robert Garcia 2.13.17 Fire reHewing reHsed set of W.485 Construct a new 78,548 SF ofice building with (714) 744-7231 plans prior to scheduling for mezzanine at an existing industrial site. rgarciaCa�cityoforange.org SMART reHew. 10 i ,. .__ St.Verena Hewes Street N. DRC 4799-15, MNSP 0814-15 Vidal F.Marquez 9/22/16 Incomplete letter sent Coptic Orthodox 491 Construct 13,000 sq. ft. sports and spiritual (714) 744-7214 5/16/18 Church center. Hnarquez@cityoforanae.ora Santiago Hills II Jamboree Road Zone Change No. 1281-16, Vesting Chad Ortlieb 12-10-15 DRC recommended Planned a4 Chapman Tentatire Tract Map Nos.17987, 17988, (714) 744-7237 approval of the modified Community Avenue 17989, 17990,&17995(VTTM Nos.0038-0042- cortliebC�cityoforange.org Design Guidelines on May 15), DRC No. 4847-15, & De4elopment 18,2016.The Planning Agreement No.0003-16. Commission conducted a A request for approval of tentati�,e tract maps public hearing and and modified Planned Community standards recommended City Council and design guidelines for a 1,180 unit residential approval on June 6,2016. subdivision in the Santiago Hills II Planned The City Council approoed Community.A modified Runoff the project on July 12,2016. Management Plan (ROMP) and modified De�elopment Agreement are also included in this request. (This request is a modification to a previously-approved project. The previous approvals allow for a maximum of 1,746 units in Santiago Hills II). Branch West Katella Avenue ZC 1284-16, MJSP 883-16, DRC 4888-16, DA Anna Pehoushek S/18/16 Planning Commission Apartments W.1725 0004-17, AA 0248-17, &MND 1853-16 (714)744-7228 recommended approval of An application for the rede�,elopment of an apehoushekC�citvoforanae.org project to City Council existing light-industrial complex with a 94 unit 9/6/17. apartment de�,elopment with structured parking and related residential amenities on a 1.10 acre City Council appro�ed site. The request includes approval of a project on 11.14.17. De�elopment Agreement for the transfer of Second reading of de�,elopment rights for 28 of the 94 units from Ordinances for Zone the adjacent water well site to the east, as well Change and De�elopment as minor reductions in required parking and Agreement occurred on driee aisle width. 12/12/17. McDonaldslChe Katella Avenue ADR 0066-17 Vidal F.Marquez 1/6/17 CDD approeed 8/16/18. vron W.105 Roofline modification and parapet remodel. (714) 744-7214 wnarquez aC�cityoforange.or9 11 �. • . - .� . . Mike'sTint KatellaW.1624 ADR-0106-18 Tiftany Chhan 8/9/18 Underreview. Approval Shop Remodel faqade with a metal element. (714) 744-7272 letter to be drafted. tchhan@cityoforange.or9 Appeal period to end Se tember 28tn Dental Oftice Katella W.1636 MJSP 0954-18, DRC 4954-18 Monique Schwartz 9/12/18 Under review. and Training (714)744-7224 Facility A proposal to demolish an existing restaurant mschwartz(a7cityoforanqe.ora and construct a new 9,884 sq. ft. two story dental o�ice and training facility,and related on site im roeements. Rehab Institute La Veta Avenue CUP 3015-16, DRC 4863-16 &MNSP 0864-16 Vidal F.Marquez 6/9/16 SMART recommended of Southern E.1800 A proposal to add 2,300 sq. ft. to an existing (714) 744-7214 approval. Califomla . building, remodel 2,000 sq. ft. of an existing wnarquez cityoforange.org DRC recommended building, and modify related parking lot and approval to PC 1.17.18. landscape areas. PC date pending per applicant. Project on hold per a licant. 8atavia Woods La Veta Avenue DRC 4889-16 Vidal F.Marquez 1/3/17 DRC provided preliminary Medical E.1800 Exterior remodel of inedical office campus. (714)744-7214 review comments on 7/5/17. vmarquez@cityoforange.org Resubmittal expected. City of Orange/ Lemon Street Zone Change 1275-14, Major Site Plan 0649- Chad Ortlieb 3/21/13 DRC recommended Metrolink N.130 (Lemon 10, Design 4675-13, Tentatiee Parcel Map (714) 744-7237 approval on 11-4-15. Parking Street Public 0005-14, and MND 183214 cortliebla�citvoToranae.org Planning Structure Parking Lot) Construction of a new fi�e-le�,el, 611space Commission recommended parking structure on the approval on 12-7-15. City Lemon Street parking lot Councii appro�,ed on 1-12- 16. Pro'ect under construction. 12 m. .. KilleferSquare Lemon Street MND No. 1844-15, 7TM No. 0046-17. GPA No. Marissa Moshier 7/16/2015 DRC preliminary review on N.541 2017-001, MJSP NO. 0850-15, CUP No. 3064- (714) 744-7243 12/20/17 17,VAR No.2246-17, &DRC No.4807-15 mmoshier@cityoforanae.org SMART recommended approval of project to DRC on 3/7/18 . IS/MND public comment , period began 3/21/18 and ended 5/4l18. DRC recommended approval to PC on 3/21/18 PC recommended approval Revised project eliminates private student to City Council on 6/4/18. housing and proposes 24 units of multi-family residential with 62 parking spaces. Reduced Scheduled for City Council scope eliminates requirement for zone change on 7/10/18 and Specific Plan.Project now requires General Plan Amendment to Low Medium Density Continued at applicant's Residential, consistent with property's existing request to 8/14/18 City R-3 zoning. Council meeting. Approoed by City Council on 8/14/18 Sunrise Senior Lincoln Avenue MNSP 0943-18 Chad Ortlieb 5-2-18 Comments provided to the Assisted Living E.1307 Preliminary reHew of a proposal to demolish and (714) 744-7237 applicant. Applicant and Memory existing ofice building to construct a new 93 cortiieb@cityoforange.ora working to respond. Care unit, 80,800 square foot senior assisted li�ing and memory care facility. This project inwlves a request for concessions and waioers from code requirements as a senior citizen housing de�elopment pursuant to State Law. 13 _ ;i. ,. OC Wine Mart$ Lincoln Avenue CUP 3057-17, &AA0258-17 Monique Schwartz 9/29/17 Request sent to Orange Deli E.1691 Establishment of a mariceUdeli with off-sale (714)744-7224 Police Department for beer, wine and distilled spirits and on-sale beer mschwartzCa�cityoforange.ora determination on 10l3/17 and wine tasting. The application also includes a request for li�e entertainment, and a 10% Planning Commission parking reduction. approred on 4/16/18 OC Hills Little Main MNSP 0893-17 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 1/30/17 Preparing CDD approval Company Office Street N.119 A proposal to cornert an existing single family (714)744-7223 letter. Conversion residence into an office. kn•buffoCa�cityoforange.org Imperial Main Street N. CUP 3015-18, DRC 4863-18, MNSP 0864-18 Vidal F.Marquez 4/17/18 Incomplete letter scheduled Stations 1234 Cornert existing car wash to express car wash (714) 744-7214 5l22/18. and construct 800-SF addition to existing vmarquez@cityoforange.ora convenience store. CHICK-FIL-A Main Street S. CUP No. 3044-17, DRC No.4909-17, &MNSP Robert Garcia Planning staff provided 202 No.0904-17 (714) 744-7231 comments on the Admin A proposal to demolish an existing vacant rqarcia@cityoforange.org Initial Study/MND to the restaurant building and construct a new 4,634 applicant. square foot dm,e-thru restaurant with 47 parking stalis,a trash enclosure and site landscaping. Douglas Leon Metropolitan MNSP 0952-18 Tiffany Chhan S/14l18 SMART review complete Drive 3960 A proposal to construct a 450 square foot (714)744-7272 and recommended approval garage to house specialty�ehicles. to CDD. To begin posting period on 9/14/18. CDD will make decision on September 24th. Joe Steele Oak Lane E. CUP 3032-16 Vidal F.Marquez 11/16/16 Incomplete Letter sent 6833 Proposal to construct 880 sq.ft.pool house with (714) 744-7214 9/18/17. '/bath and sink. �,mamuezC�citvoforanae.orq Appiicant request hold on ro'ect. Congregation Oiive Street N. CUP 3047-17 Marissa Moshier 5/11/2017 Application incomplete. Ale House 114 Request for ABC Type 47 License for new 714-744-7243 Comment letter provided to restaurant in the Plaza mmoshierla�citvoforange.orq applicant 14 .. o- First Orange Street N MNSP 0888-16 Marissa Moshier 12/9/2016 SMART on 12/21/16. Presbyterian 191 Preliminary review for a proposal to demolish 714-744-7243 Comment lettersenton Church of three of four existing church campus buildings, mmoshier@citvoforange.org 1/9/16. Orange construct a new 10,000 SF childcare center on an existing surface parking lot on N. Grand, Resubmittal on 5/17/17. construct a new 20,000 SF office building at the comer of Maple and Orange, and construct a Preliminary review of new sur(ace parking lot with 94 spaces. childcare center and parking lot on Orange Street by DRC on 6/7/17 Sanford Orange Street ADR 0089-17 Monique Schwartz 8/23/17 Incomplete Letter sent Residence N.834 A proposal for a 1,304 square foot single story (714)744-7224 9/18/17 addition. mschwartzCo�cityoforange.org Revised Plans receired 2J6/18 CDD approval on 3/5/18 Gunwhale Ales Orangewood W. CUP 3070-18 Robert Garcia Staff reviewing additional 1507 (714) 744-7231 information provided by Request for a small beer manufacturer with marcia(a�cityoforange.org applicant. tasting room. Wahlqulst Pine Street N. DRC 4922-17 Marissa Moshier 7.6.2017 Application complete. Residence 138 A proposal for a 719 SF addition to an existing (714)744-7243 Continued by DRC on historic single family residence in the Old Towne mmoshierCa)citvoforanae.org 5/2/18 - Historic District. Reich Pine StreetS. ADR 0079-17 Marissa Moshier 6.21.17 Application incomplete. Residence 349 A proposal to alter the front porch on a residence (714)744-7243 Comment letter provided to in the Old Towne Historic District mmoshier@cityoforange.ora applicant. All Home Plaza Square 10 DRC 4950-18 Marissa Moshier 7.3.2018 Resubmittal under review Lending Signage for office tenant (714) 744-7243 mmoshierCu�citvoforange.org Plaza Bible Poplar Street N. CUP 3004-16, &ADR 0046-16 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 3/17/2016 Incomplete letter sent. Church 671 A proposal to locate a new church in an existing (714)744-7223 Awaiting applicant industrial building with new shared parking kribufto cityoforanae.om response. agreement. 15 .. • . - .-- . . C8M Concrete PoplarStreetN. CUP, MNSP 877-16 Vidal F.Marquez 9/6/16 Planning Commission Contractors 749 Installation of modular buildings for ofice and (714)744-7214 appro�ed 6.5.17 storage space vmarauezCa�cityoforanae.ora Awaiting Plan Check submittal. Dinh Residence Sacramento ADR 0083-17 Monique Schwartz 7/17/17 Incomplete Letter sent to Street N.2330 Addition to an existing single family residence. (714) 744-7224 applicant on 8l17/17 mschwartzCa�cityoforange.org Revised plans received 11/2/17 Incomplete Letter sent 11/27/17 Revised Plans receioed 7/31/18 Incomplete Letter sent 8/2/18 Revised plans receivad 8/20/18 CDD Detertnination of a roval on 8/29/18 Design Santiago Blvd. CUP 3039-17, DRC 4898-17, &MNSP 0896-17 Monique Schwartz 2.9.17 Incomplete Letter sent to Concepts N.2640 A proposal to remodel to an existing service (714) 744-7224 applicant on 2/22/17 station, addition to existing cornenience store, mschwartz aC�cityoforange.org and new automatic drioe through carwash. Revised plans recei�ed 7/7/17 Incomplete Letter sent to applicant on 7/31/17 Revised Plans recei�ed 8/15/17 Incomplete Letter sent to applicant on 8/28/17 16 .. • . - .-- . . Revised Plans recei�ed 9/12J17 Revised Plans recei�ed 9/15/17 SMART Meeting on 9/27/17 Incomplete Letter sent 10/5/17 Revised Plans recei�ed on 12/19/17 Incomplete Letter sent on 1/3/17 Revised plans recei�ed 4/1211 B SMART Meeting on 4/25//1 S Incomplete Letter sent to applicant on 5/22/18 Meeting with Applicant, Fire and Public Works on 6/5/18 Memo recei�ed from Sr. Landscape Coordinator on 8/6/18 regarding adequacy of UI Plans—forwarded to applicant Revised Plans recei�ed on 8/30/1 S SMART Meeting on 9/12/18 17 �. • , . ,._ . . Incomplete Letter sent on 9/18/18 Solar Carports Santiago Blvd. MNSP 0913-17 Monique Schwartz 7/12/17 Incomplete Letter sent to N.2860 Installation of solar carpoRs. (714) 744-7224 applicant on 8/2/17 mschwartz@cityoforange.org Revised plans recei�ed 11/15/17 Incomplete Letter sent 11/27/17 Revised plans receired 2/13/18 SMART meeting on 3/21/18 Incomplete Letter sent on 3/27/1 S 18 o, �•' Trails at Santiago GPA 2018-0001, ZC No. 1286-18, DA No. Robert Garcia Applicant will re-circulate the Santiago Creek Canyon Rd,E. 0005-18, and ENV No. 1857-18 (714)744-7231 DEIR for public review. 6145 rcaaroia@citvoforange.org The applicant is requesting a General Plan Staff has provided Amendment and Zone Change for the comments on the revised de�,elopment of 129 dwellings on approximately DEIR sections that ha�e 40.2 acres of the 109-acre site.The majority of been proHded. the project site is intended for the enhancement and presenation of the natural greenway/open space and Santiago Creek enHrons (40.2 acres), as well as re-establishing open grasslands in areas that has been denuded by the project site's history of commercial operations (20.5 acres), and open space/managed regetation (8.3 acres), totaling approximately 69 acres. Mara Brandman Santiago TTM No. 0048-18, MNSP No. 0948-18 ENV Robert Garcia Planning Commission Riding Arena Canyon Rd,E. No. 1859-18 (714) 744-7231 hearing set for October 15�. 6146 r�c arciaC�a citvoforange.org Proposed subdiHsion ofthe riding arena into six parcels consistentwith the R-1�}0 de�,elopment standards. Holy Sepulcher Santiago CUP 3041-17, VAR 2245-17, DRC 4901-17, Monique Schwartz 2/14/17 Incomplete Letter sent to Cemetery Canyon Road MNSP 0899-17, &ENV 1854-17 (714) 744-7224 applicant on 3.13.17 E.7845 A proposal to construct a new cemetery mschwartz oC�cityoforange.org maintenance facility Revised plans recei�ed 7/7/17 SMART Meeting on 8/16/17 Incomplete Letter sent 9/7/17 Shaffer Project Shaffer Street TPM 0006-15, MNSP 0808-15, &ADR 0023-15 Chad Ortlieb 4-2-15 Project appro�ed with the N.7746 Subdivision of one parcel into two parcels to (714) 744-7237 condition that landscaping construct two new homes. cortlieb@cityoforange.org retumed to the DRC. The applicant has placed the pro'ect on hold. 19 -� .. • . - .- . . Selman Shaffer Street CUP 3063-18 Vidal F.Marquez 2.21.18 incomplete letter sent Residence N.945 Construction of 653 sq.ft. outdoor kitchen and (714) 744-7214 6/13/18 pool house. vmarquezna cityoforanae.ora Nguyen Silverleaf Proposal for the construction of a 1,250 square Monique Schwartz 1/12/17 Approeed by the Residence Avenue foot single story addition to an existing 1,450 (714) 744-7224 Community Derelopment 4731 square foot, one story single family residence. mschwartz@cityoforange.org Director on 1/16/17 Town& Town and TPM0012-16, MJSP No. 0866-16, DRC 4864- Anna Pehoushek 6/20/16 Design Review Committee Country Country Road 16&AA 0254-17 (714) 744-7228 recommended approval to Mixed Use and W.999 A proposal to construct a fiee-story residential �houshek@citvoforange.ora Planning Commission on Site Integration building containing 262 apartment units 6/7/17. surrounding a parking structure, construct an additional parking structure to serve an existing Planning Commission office building on an existing commercially approeed project on 7/7/17. de�eloped property including related site impro�,ements. DRC approoed final lighting and color and material palette for Phase I(office parking structure)on 11/15/17. Town and Town and TTM 0045-17, MJSP 0906-17, DRC 4914-17, Monique SchwaRz 4/14/17 SMART 5/3/17 Country Country Road AA 0253-17, 8�MND 1855-17 (714) 744-7224 Apartments and W.702-1078 A proposal to redeuelop a 12 acre office mschwartz@cityoforange.org Incomplete Letter sent Townhomes compiex with 727 multi-family units (653 5/16/17 apartments, and 74 townhomes) Revised plans receired 6/12J17 Incomplete Letter sent 7/17J17 DRC preliminary review 1 8/2117 Revised Plans receieed 8/31/17 DRC preliminary review 2 9/20/17 20 .. . , . .._ , . SMART 10/11/17 for DRAFT MND review Revised Plans recei�ed 10/16/17 SMART 10/25/17 Incomplete Letter sent 11/22/17 2"a Check MND comments sent 11/22/17 3ro Check MND recei�,ed 12J21/17 3ro Check MND comments sent 1/25/18 4'h Check MND receieed 2/2J18 SMART 2/21/18 DRC on 4/4/18 Planning Commission Meeting 5/21/18 Project Appro�ed by City Council on 6/12/18 Request for changes to Precise Plans forwarded to CDD 21 - o. • . - o•- . . CDD Determination of approval on changes 8/15/18 , 15�Check Building Plans for Bldg.B and Parking Structure B receired on 8/28/18 15�Check Building Plans for Bldg.A and Parking Structure A recei�ed on � 9/10/18 Ocampo Tracy Lane S. ADR 0104 Monique Schwartz 7/11/18 Incomplete Letter sent Residence 335 A proposal for a 1,242 sq.ft.room addition and (714) 744-7224 7/23/18 new detached two car garage. mschwartz(a�citvoforanae.ora Target Tustin Street N. ADR 0058-16 Monique Schwartz 10/17/16 Under review 2791 A proposai for faqade and signage (714) 744-7224 Revised Plans recei�ed improrements mschwartz(a�cityoforange.org 11/23l16 Appro�ed by Community De�elopment Director on 12/12J16 Orange Sky Tustin StreetN. CUP 3006-16, MJSP 0855-16 &DRC 4854-16 Anna Pehoushek 4/1/16 Applicant resubmitted Villas 180 Proposal to construct a 35-unit senior housing (714)744-7228 11/16/17. Scheduled for center within a structure with a partially apehoushek@citvoforange.org SMART reHew 11/29/17. subgrade paricing garage and two floors of residential units abo�e, and related site improrements. Sky Palm Motel Tustin Street N. DRC No.4919-17 Robert Garcia The applicant has submitted 210 Exterior renovations and second story addition (714)744-7231 revised plans,staff to to motel lobby. rgarcia cityoforanae.ora schedule for SMART review. McDonald's ustin StreetN. CUP 3021-16, &MNSP 0853-16 Vidal F.Marquez 2/19/16 DRC recommend denial at 2407 Demo and reconstruct 5,790 sq.ft. McDonald's (714)744-7214 2/21/18 meeting restaurant with dri�e-thru window and wnarquez@cityoforange.orq PC approeed 4.2.18 with associated site impro�ements. additional conditions 15�Plan check 5/7/78 22 �. • . - •-- , . 2"a plan check 9/19/18 Orange Express Tustin Street N. CUP 3065-18, DRC 4939-18, MNSP 0938-18 Monique Schwartz 3/29/18 Incomplete Letter sent to Car Wash 387 Modification of an existing full service car wash (714)744-7224 applicant on 5/16/18 to an express car wash. mschwartz[�a cityoforange.org Revised plans receioed 7/16/18(Incomplete re- submittal) Incomplete Letter sent to applicant on 7/30/18 Old Towne Zone Various Old ZC No. 1271-13 Anna Pehoushek 1/29/13 City Council hearing date Change—Multi- Towne Parcels A proposal to re-zone certain properties in the (714) 744-7228 TBD. Family west of the Old Towne 2010 General Plan Land Use Focus apehoushek(a�cityoforanae.ora Residential railroad tracks, Area from Limited Business(C-1), Single Family Planning Commission east of Batavia Residential (R-1), and Duplex Residential (R-2) hearing held 10/21/13. PC Street,south of to R-2 and Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to recommended approval to WalnutAvenue, establish consistency between the General Plan CC. and north of and Zoning designations in the area, in CulverAvenue accordance with state law, and establish a single zoning for split zoned property. ' 23 ,. . , . ,._ . . RRD Hospitality Village Way, CUP 3066-18 Vidal F.Marquez 3.29.18 PC approeed 7/2/18 Group 2,LLC Suite 2197, E. Request for modification to existing CUP (714)744-7214 1500 regarding change in hours of operation for new knarauezla�citvoforanqe.org business.The Pizza Press North Orange. Verizon WalnutAvenue MNSP 0953-18 Marissa Moshier 9.10.18 Under review Wireless Facility E.1130 A proposai to add a wireless facility at an (714) 744-7243 existing church. mmoshier@cityoforange.org Seventh Day WalnutAvenue MNSP 0885-16 Monique Schwartz 11.17.16 Reviewed by SMART Adventist E.1310 A proposal to convert an existing enclosed patio (714) 744-7224 Committee on 12/7/16 Church into multi-purpose room, relocation of kitchen, mschwartzCa�cityoforange.orq and ADA impro�,ements. Incomplete Letter sent 12/13/16 Revised Plans receieed 1/11/17 Community De�,elopment Director approval sent on 1/16/16 First Golden Washington MJSP No. 823-15, &DRC No.4812-15 Robert Garcia 7/9/15 Plans ha�e inconsistencies Village Avenue E. Request to construct four new duplexes on four (714) 744-7231 and a number of Duplexes 4521-d545 separate lots of record. rgarcia@cityoforange.org departments ha�,e outstanding unaddressed items on incomplete letter. Staff provided a copy of the street light standards. SMART provided additional comments,based on the applicant responses McGuire/Moreno Washington DRC 4897-17 Kelly Christensen Ribuffo 2.3.2017 Continued by DRC on Residence Avenue E.539 Exterior modifications to a contributing historic (714) 744-7223 7/19/2017 to date uncertain residence in Old Towne. kribuffo a(�cit�oforanqe.org - 24 o. ' . • �•_ . . Burgueno WaverlyStreet ADR 0061-16 Vidal F.MSrquez 12/21/16 CDD approoed 6/20/17. Residence N.514 2"d Story addition with 2 bedrooms and bath (714) 744-7214 Under construction. Hnarquez(a�ciNoforana e.ora West Katelia West Katella ZC No. 1268-12 Anna Pehoushek 1/29/13 Zoning options under Corridor Zone Avenue A proposal to re-zone the westem Katella (714) 744-7228 deeelopment. Change—Urban (between Main Corridor 2010 General Plan Land Use Focus apehoushek@cityoforange.org City Council hearing Mixed Use Street and the Area from Commercial Recreation (CR) to 10/22/13 and 2/10/15. western City Urban Mixed Use (UMIXj to establish Continued to unidentified IimiUSantaAna consistency between the General Plan and date. River) Zoning designations in the area, in accordance Planning Commission with state law. hearing held 2/4/13. Planning Commission recommended approval to City Council. Future Council consideration to be determined. Lyall Residence Windes Drive ADR No.0086-17 Robert Garoia Planning staff reviewing 1825 Request to demolish an existing residence and (714)744-7231 revised set of plans. construct a new residence with a similar foot raarcia_citvoforange.ora print. Holbrook Windes Drive MNSP No. 0950-16 Tifiany Chhan Staff to review plans. Residence RV 1873 A proposal to construct a 1,960 square foot (714) 744-7272 Scheduled for SMART Garage garage for storage of an RV and car collection. tchhan cityoforange.org 8/1/18. 25 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix E: Responses to Comments THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK RESPONSES TO WRITTEN COMMENTS Introduction The City of Orange, as the lead agency, evaluated the comments received on the Draft IS/MND (Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1860-18) for the Billboard Ordinance Update Project, and has prepared the following responses to the comments received. This Response to Comments document becomes part of the Final IS/MND for the project. Public Engagement Outfront Media submitted a formal proposal regarding the Relocation Agreement in June 2017. In October 2017, the City sent out 346 notices to property owners and tenants in the area adjacent to Billboard Location 1 (1936 E. Katella Avenue) in advance of a City Council Study Session Meeting on November 14, 2017. Because the Relocation Agreement is not a land use determination, the City was not required to notice surrounding residents, but did so as a discretionary action. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072,1 on November 7, 2018, the City sent a Legal Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing and Notice of Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1860-18 (NOI; reproduced in this Response to Comments in ARCHER.I for reference)via direct mail to a total of 461 properly owners/tenants in the area adjacent to Billboard Site 1, persons specifically requesting notice, and applicable organizations and agencies. The notice was published in the Orange County Register newspaper on November 7, 2018. Noticing also occurred on the City website, via posting at City libraries, and via posting at City Hall. Copies of the IS/MND were made available for public review at the locations listed in the Notice of Intent, and comments on the IS/MND were received from November 7 to November 29, 2018. Responses to Comments List of Authors A list of public agencies, organizations, and individuals that provided comments on the Draft IS/MND is presented below. Each comment has been assigned a code. Individual comments within each communication have been numbered so comments can be crossed-referenced with responses. Following this list, the text of the communication is reprinted and followed by the corresponding response. ' Califomia Code of Regulations,Title 14. No date. Article 6-Negarive Declaration Process:Sections 15070 to 15075. Website: http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/guidelines/art6.htm1. Accessed November 19,2018. 1 Author Author Code Individuals Shelly Archer,letter 1 ...........................................................................................................ARCHER.1 ShellyArcher,letter 2...........................................................................................................ARCHER.2 Shelly Archer,letter 3 ...........................................................................................................ARCHER.3 RobinAuerbach..................................................................................................................AUERBACH Kenand Kim Domer..................................................................................................................DOMER VirginiaLorimor....................................................................................................................LORIMOR Scottand Mary Veatch..............................................................................................................VEATCH Master ResFonses Master responses address similar comments made by multiple public agencies, businesses, organizations, or individuals through written comments submitted to the City of Orange. List of Master Responses • Master Response 1—General Opposition to the Project Master Response 1—General Opposition to the Project Summary ofRelevant Comments Several commenters expressed general opposition to the project. Response CEQA requires that the Final IS/NIND address comments on the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND (Public Resources Code Section 21091(d)(2)(B);z CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b)).3 CEQA considerations are limited to environmental issues and the potential impacts of the project on the environment. Personal opinions expressing general support for, or opposition to, the project are noted and will be included within the overall administrative record for the project, but do not require a written response if they do not relate to an environmental issue or topical area that is addressed within the Draft IS/MND. Likewise, opinions about the general desirability, merits, or purely economic or political considerations of the project are not within the purview of CEQA Guidelines and do not require a written response. Concerns about the project approval should be submitted directly to Ashley Brodkin,Associate Planner, at the City of Orange Community Development Deparhnent, 300 East Chapman Avenue, CA 92866, email abrodkin@cityoforange.org, or at the public hearings to be conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council. Comment Letters and Responses The comment letters reproduced in the following pages follow the same organization as used in the List of Authors. ' Public Resources Code. No date. Chapter 2.6 General[21080-21098]. Wcbsite: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?]awCode=PRC&sectionNum=21091. Accessed November 19, 2018. 3 Califomia Code of Regulations,Title 14. No date. Article 6-Negative Declaration Process:Sections 15070 to 15075. Website: http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/guidelines/azt6.htm1. Accessed November 19,2018. 2 ARCHER.1 On Nov 11,2018, at 12:09 PM,Shelly Archer<Shelly.Archer@360dg.com>wrote: PBge 1 Of 4 Hi Will — I received the attached notice. Can you clarify? Does this mean they are discussing the digital billboard subject at the Nov 14th meeting or is it already approved and moving forward? Can you explain to me the steps that are taking place? What are the next steps? It appears it was already approved? � I received this notice on Saturday, November 10th. This is not enough time to get the word out to everyone that is against this, clear our calendars and attend the meeting. The notice does not give any details on the meeting? What time?Where exactly? 2 What are the alternatives here? Shelly Shelly Archer Managing Parfner 360 Des4ination Group ,�.,.,. ARCHER.1 ;-�� Page 2 of 4 �-. —=-�=�� °�ok�`�, �c,`��`�`'� �'�� City of Orange 9:. �� T� �_ �. 9y�., �.� .oQ Community Development Department �F..�Q,�.�,�.,_ ;�,,��P �,�,. k � `'-��:..-.,� Transmittal To: All interested parties From: William Crouch, Community Development Director Date: November 7, 2018 Re: PUBLIC NOTICE -City of Orange Proposed Billboard Ordinance Update Which May Implement the City's November 14,2017 Relocation and Removal Agreement with Outfront Media The City Council of the City of Orange approved a Relocation and Removal Agreement with Outfront Media at the November 14, 2017, City Council meeting for the conversion of the billboard at 1936 E. Katella Avenue (west side of the SR 55 Freeway, south of Katella Avenue)to an LED digital billboard. The City is considering an update to the Billboard Ordinance, which would implement the Relocation and Removal Agreement. This notice is being provided to you because you own and/or occupy property that is in the proximity of the billboard being considered for conversion or because of your previous interest in the relocation agreement. Please see the enclosed Legal Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing and Notice of Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1860-18 for details. ARCHER.1 Page 3 of 4 LEGAL NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1860-18 TO: All Interested Parties SUBJECT: Billboard Ordinance Update,Zone Change No. 1292-18 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1860-18 SCHEDULED PUBLIC The City will hold a Planning Commission Hearing at 7:00 p.m. on December MEETING 3, 2018 in the Orange Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 300 East DATE/TIME/LOCATION: Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866. A notice of a City Council hearing for the proposed project will be distributed in the same manner as this notice once a date is established. The public and interested agencies are invited to attend any of the meetings. PROJECT LOCATIONS: .g�ti.oard .� •Location '" ' 3APN�'` 1 West side of SR-55, 100 feet south of East 375-532-07 Katella Avenue 2 West side of SR-55, 1,900 feet north of 372-642-33 Meats Avenue 3 West side of SR-57,250 feet south of West 232-032-01 Chapman Avenue 4 East side of SR-57, 100 feet south of the 386-381-04;386- Santa Ana River 381-OS 5 East side of SR-57,220 feet east ofthe SR- 386-401-14 57 North on ramp PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City is proposing to repeal and delete Chapter 5.62, Signs and Billboards, in its entirety, and to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.36 Sign Regulations to add a new Section 17.36.180 that would provide guidance for the "relocation" of existing billboards within the City. As defined in the proposed Billboard Ordinance, "relocation" includes the conversion of an existing static billboard display to a digital display, subject to the removal of other existing billboard faces on major arterial streets in the City or within the viewshed of the City. PROJECT APPLICANT/ LEAD AGENCY: City of Orange,300 East Chapman Avenue, Orange,CA 92866 ARCHER.1 Page 4 of 4 ENVIRONMENTAL Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1860-18 was prepared to evaluate the INFORMATION: potential environmental impacts of the proposed project in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. The City invites you to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The public review period begins on November 7, 2018 and ends on November 29. 2018. Written comments must be received in the offices of the City of Orange Planning Division at 300 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866, or via email at abrodkin@cityoforange.org,by 5:30 P.M. on November 29,2018. Copies of the Mitigated Negative Declaration are available for public review at the following locations: • Main Library and History Center(407 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866) • Taft Branch Library(740 East Taft Avenue, Orange CA 92865) • El Modena Branch Library(380 South Hews, Orange,CA 92865) • Orange City Hall, Offices of the City Clerk and Community Development Department, 300 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866) • www.ci oforange.or�/290/Current-Projects under "Project Notices and- related Environmental Documents". FURTHER INFORMATION: To obtain further information about the project, please contact Ashley Brodkin,Associate Planner, at the City of Orange Planning Division at(714) 744-7238 or via e-mail at abrodkin e,cit, o�fo.ran�org. If you challenge any decision on this request in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at,or prior to,the public meeting. Individuals ShellyArcher, letter 1 (ARCHER.1) Response toARCHER.l-1 The commenter refers to the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) and asks for clarity about the status of the project and next steps. The Billboard Ordinance Update has not been approved. The Billboard Ordinance Update will be considered by the Planning Commission on December 3, 2018. The City Council will make the final determination. A date for the City Council hearing has not been set. The notice received dated November 7, 2017, refers to the relocation agreement with Outfront Media, which was approved by the City Council on November 14, 2017. The Relocation Agreement did not commit the City to any course of action; the effective date of the agreement is wholly contingent on the adoption of the Billboard Ordinance Update. If the City Council adopts the Billboard Ordinance Update, the Relocation Agreement would become effective and Outfront Media would be entitled to apply for the approvals necessary to remove certain signs and convert the sign at Billboard Location 1, including any necessary building permits, electrical pernuts, demolition permits, and Minor Site Plan Review. If the City Council does not approve the Billboard Ordinance Update, the Relocation Agreement cannot be implemented. � The IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the Billboard Ordinance Update and will inform the decision-makers as they consider the project as a whole. The IS/MND circulated for public comment from November 7 to November 29, 2018, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. Response to ARCHER.1-2 The commenter states that she was not given enough time to prepare for the Planning Commission meeting and that the NOI does not give any details on the meeting. CEQA Guidelines Section 15072(a) requires a lead agency to provide an NOI to adopt an IS/MND "sufficiently prior" to adoption by the lead agency.4 The NOI was sent on November 7, 2018, 27 days prior to the Planning Commission Hearing. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15073(a) requires a public review period of not less than 20 days. The IS/MND was circulated for public comment for 23 days, which complies with CEQA Guidelines. The NOI provides the date, time, and location of the Planning Commission Hearing. In addition, the NOI provides the contact information for Ashley Brodkin, Associate Planner, at the City of Orange Planning Division, should members of the public have questions regarding the project or the meeting. " Califomia Code of Regulations,Title 14. No date. Article 6-Negative Declaration Process:Section 15070 to 15075. Website: http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/guidelines/art6.htm1. Accessed November 19,2018. 7 From:Shelly Archer<Shelly.Archer@360dg.com> ARCHER.2 Sent:Tuesday, November 13, 2018 2:18 PM Page 1 of 1 To:Will Kolbow<wkolbow@cityoforange.org> Cc: max.ashburn@scenic.org; Robin Auerbach<robin@edgemac.com> Subject:Questions: Digital Billboard Hi Will-I have a few more questions.... � I want to be sure I understand the notice that was received. It states there are 5 billboards up for discussion on Dec 3. I believe that originally Outfront Media was proposing the removal of some ,� billboards in leu of converting the one on Katella to digital. Is this still the plan? Can you elaborate on which ones will be removed? Is the only proposed digital billboard currently the one on Katella? 2. Can you also clarify exactly what the financial benefit is to the city? You mentioned an annual fee, but can explain exactly the financial gain to the city? I also understand the city receives free adds and use 2 of it in emergency situations but I am more interested in the exact money the city will receive. 3. You mentioned previously you were working on "Proposed language that will govern this (City Zoning?) and any future digital billboards". Was this finalized? Can you please share? 3 4. You also mentioned earlier there would a ban on marijuana advertising (for example) due to the City's current ban on marijuana dispensaries and related businesses. However what would happen if the city lifted this ban? 4 5. Did Outfront Media obtain the necessary permits from Caltrans? 5 6. Citizens Committee: We are creating a Citizens Committee to provide thoughtful, organized and researched information on this project. What are the steps for allowing this committee to present during the upcoming Planning Commission hearing? 6 � We are hiring an property assessor to understand the decrease in value of the properties that will be affected. What are the steps for allowing this experf to present during the upcoming Planning Commission hearing? Thank you,Shelly i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ShellyArcher, letter 2 (ARCHER.2) Response to ARCHER.2-1 The commenter requests clarification on the Billboard Relocation Agreement with Outfront Media. In November 2017, the City and Outfront Media entered into a tentative Relocation Agreement for the relocation and consolidation of billboard signs that would result in the removal of five sign faces and the upgrade of the existing billboard at 1936 Katella Avenue (Billboard Location 1)to Light Emitting Diode(LED). The Relocation Agreement did not commit the City to any course of action; the effective date of the agreement is wholly contingent on the adoption of the Billboard Ordinance Update. If the City Council adopts the Billboard Ordinance Update, the Relocation Agreement would become effective and Outfront Media would be entitled to apply for the approvals necessary to remove certain signs and convert the sign at Billboard Location 1, including any necessary building permits, electrical pertnits, demolition pernuts, and Minor Site Plan Review. If the City Council does not approve the Billboard Ordinance Update, the Relocation Agreement cannot be implemented. The Billboard Ordinance Update, if approved, would allow Outfront Media, or other owners of existing billboards to apply for permission to remove and convert other billboards pursuant to the updated Billboard Ordinance. Response to ARCHER.2-2 The commenter requests clarification on the financial benefits of the project to the City. Opinions about the economic considerations of the project are not within the purview of CEQA Guidelines and do not require a written response. More information regarding the financial gain to the City can be found in the City's Billboard Ordinance Update Q&A page (please refer to footnote 5)5, as well as the Staff Report and Agreement included in the City Council packet for the November 14, 2017 meeting, which can be found on the City's webpage for the project(please refer to footnote 6).6 Response to ARCHER.2-3 The commenter requests to review the proposed language that will govern digital billboards within the City of Orange. The draft Billboard Ordinance is included as Appendix A of the IS/MND. Response to ARCHER.2-4 The commenter questions what would if happen if the City's ban on marijuana advertising would be lifted. 5 City of Orange. 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Q&A. Website: https://www.cityoforangaorg/DocumentCenter/View/7991Billboard-Ordinance-Update-QA. Accessed November 19,2018. 6 City of Orange. 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update. Website:http:/hvww.cityoforange.org/1841Billboard-Ordinance-Update. Accessed November 19,2018. 11 This comment does not address the adequacy of the IS/MND. No response is required. Please refer to the City's Billboard Ordinance Update Q&A page (footnote 5) for more information regarding restrictions on the content of the advertisements on the digital billboards. Response to ARCHER.2-5 The commenter inquires whether Outfront Media would need to obtain pernuts from Caltrans. If the Billboard Ordinance Update is approved by the City Council, Outfront Media would be required to obtain an Outdoor Advertising Permit from Caltrans prior to completion of the Minor Site Plan Review by the City. Response to ARCHER.2-6 The commenter states that a Citizens Committee is being created and a property assessor is being hired and inquires as to the next steps for allowing the Citizens Committee and property assessor to present during the December 3, 2018,Planning Commission Hearing. All members of the public are given an opportunity to provide written and/or oral comments at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Commenters can cede their allotted time to a representative who can speak on their behalf. Similarly, the property assessor can submit written or oral comments at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. � 12 ARCHER.3 Page 1 of 2 From: Shelly Archer<Shelly.Archer@360dg.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 28, 2018 3:59 PM To:Ashley Brodkin <abrodkin@cityoforange.org> Cc: max.ashburn@scenic.org; robin@edgemac.com;Will Kolbow<wkolbow@cityoforange.org>;Anna Pehoushek <apehoushek@cityoforange.org>; Chad Ortlieb <cortlieb@cityoforange.org>; 'Steve Shanahan' <steve@infinitylighting.net> Subject: [BULK] RE: Questions: Digital Billboard Importance: Low Hi Ashley— • You mentioned the Dec 3 Planning Commission meeting will be discussing the Environmental review documents. I Can you specifically let me know which documents will be reviewed from this link: http://www.cityoforange.org/ � 1841/Billboard-Ordinance-Update Or will it be all of them? • In the original Staff Report and Agreement from the November 14, 2017 City Council Meeting,this document only mentions the conversion of the one billboard on Katella. No other billboard conversions are mentioned in this document. Can you tell me when the change took place and provide any updated documentation that states this 2 change? When was it brought in front of the City Council again with this change of converting 5 billboards? What is the change in the financial aspect from Outfront Media based on converting 5 billboards vs. 1? • Let me know how the decisions were made regarding#6 and#7 below. Is this standard procedure and process? Are these rules or regulations posted somewhere that you can send me to? 3 • As I mentioned on our phone call,there is a conflict of interest of having OutFront Media pay for and select the I vendor of the Photometric Analysis. At a minimum the City should select the vendor, not Outfront Media. 4 11/29/2018 ARCHER.3 Page 2 f 2 • The Photometric Analysis is not taking into the account the complete impact of the current billboard let alone a digital version. The report is only showing the results based on a 250 ft radius.This radius only extends midway 5 across the freeway and therefore not taking into the account the homes nearby that will be severely afFected. • Combined with an unbiased Photometric Analysis, a professional Real Estate appraiser needs to be hired by the city to report on the decrease in value of the homes directly affected. The digital billboard will be categorized as an External Obsolescence and will directly effect the value of the homes within view of the billboards. A digital 6 billboard will increase the External Obsolescence and therefore will decrease the home values even more in the area. Thank you and please advise. Shelly Shelly Archer Managing Partner 360 Destination Group California � Arizona � Texas � Chicago � Florida � New York O 949.348.1900 � C 714.476.6488 Shelly.Archer@360dg.com � www.360dg.com ShellyArcher, letter 3 (ARCHER.3) Response to ARCHER.3-1 The commenter requests clarification regarding which environmental review documents will be discussed at the December 3,2018 Planning Commission hearing. At the December 3, 2018 hearing, the Planning Commission will consider whether to recommend to the City Council the adoption the IS/MND. All documents listed at the link cited by the commenter will be under consideration as part of the hearing. Response to ARCHER.3-2 The commenter requests clarification regarding the nuxnber of billboard conversions being considered. The billboard conversions are discussed in the Project Description. Table 1: Retained Billboard Locations (page vi) lists the retained billboard locations; Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map provides an aerial map of all the billboards that could be converted to LED if the City Council adopts the Billboard Ordinance Update. As discussed on page xxi of the IS/MND, the Billboard Ordinance Update, as proposed, requires the permanent removal of a minimum of five static billboard faces for every two billboard facings proposed for conversion to an electronic format. The location of billboards proposed for removal will be determined in conjunction with each application for a proposed billboard relocation/conversion. In general, existing billboards are surrounded by major arterial roadways, commercial,residential, light industrial, and rail lines. Any update would require approvals necessary to remove the minixnum of five static billboard faces for every two faces to be converted to LED, including any necessary building permits, electrical permits, demolition permits, and Minor Site Plan Review. In November 2017, the City and Outfront Media entered into a tentative Relocation Agreement for the relocation and consolidation of signs that would result in the removal of five sign faces and the upgrade of the existing billboard at 1936 E. Katella Avenue (Billboard Location 1) to LED. This Relocation Agreement did not commit the City to approving the project or to any course of action, and was wholly contingent on the City's later adoption of the Billboard Ordinance Update. If the ordinance amendments are adopted, this Relocation Agreement would become effective and Outfront Media would be entitled to apply for remaining approvals to remove various signs and construct a new sign at the Katella Avenue site, including any necessary building permits, electrical permits, demolition permits, and Minor Site Plan Review. Response to ARCHER.3-3 The commenter requests clarification regarding who may present to the Planning Commission during the hearing. Pursuant to standard protocols for public hearings, the Planning Commission will open the public hearing and will invite members of the public to provide comments on the item. 15 All members of the public are given an opportunity to provide written and/or oral comments at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Commenters can cede their allotted time to a representative who can speak on their behalf. Similarly, the ,property assessor can submit written or oral comments at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Response to ARCHER.3-4 The commenter suggests that there is a conflict of interest in having Outfront Media pay for the site-specific photometric analysis. As stated in the site-specific photometric analysis,the analysis used the standards set forth by the Outdoor Advertising Association of America (OAAA) Lighting Level Guideline: "the proposed sign, displaying a full white image (for maximum brightness) should not exceed 0.3 foot candles over the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250 feet in any direction."' The analysis was completed using a maximum screen brightness of 300 nits$ (300 candela per square meter) in the evening. The analysis was completed assuxning no ambient light, which is the worst-case scenario. The site-specific photometric analysis ' concluded that light levels would not exceed 03 foot-candles over the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250 feet in any direction, and would actually dissipate to 0.0 foot- candles at a distance of 250 feet. Therefore, the lighting would be consistent with the proposed Billboard Ordinance Update as well as requirements as set forth by California State Law,9 the OAAA, and the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA). Response to ARCHER.3-S The commenter asserts that the photometric analysis does not take into account the complete impact of conversion to a digital billboard because it only analyzes a 250-foot radius. The IS/NIlVD discusses the regulatory context and standards for billboards on pages xxlc to xxxiii, including both the Caltrans Outdoor Advertising Act and the OAAA. As noted therein, the Billboard Ordinance Update reflects standards that are equivalent to or more restrictive than Caltrans Outdoor Advertising Act,Business and Professions Code Section 5403(g), and OAAA requirements arid recommendations. Response to ARCHER.3-6 The commenter requests that a professional Real Estate appraiser be hired by the City to report on the decrease in homes values as a result of the Billboard Ordinance Update. The comment does not relate to the environmental document and does not require a written response. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in determining whether to approve the project and the accompanying resolution. � Exp(prepazed by Michael Schrupp). 2018. City of Orange,1936 E.Katella Ave-Digital Billboazds Photometric Analysis. Website: http://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenter/View/8012/1936-E-Katella-Ave-Digital-Billboazd-Photometric-Analysis. e In lighting,the nit is a unit of visible-light intensity,commonly used to specify the brightness of a cathode ray tube or liquid crystal display computer display. One nit is equivalent to one candela per square metec The candela is approximately the amount of light emitted by a common tallow candle. 9 Business and Professions Code Section 5405(d)(1) 16 AUERBACH Page 1 of 1 From: Robin Auerbach<robin@edgemac.com> Sent: Monday, November 12,2018 12:02 PM To: councilinfo<councilinfo@cityoforange.org> Subject: Unhappy with the handling of the billboard Mayor Smith and City Council Members, My neighbors and I have been corresponding overtime with Will regarding the billboard at the west end of the Presidential tract. We just received notices that this is now going for the environmental review and approval. I am letting you know that there are quite a few of our � neighbors that are very upset, including myself at the handling of this action. For those of us in the 2500 block of Coolidge who were not included in the original notices,we are playing catch up on the issue and feel that this build board is not in our best interest as homeowners. Those living much closer than us have I 2 viable concerns as to their privacy and property values. I more so am concerned with the constant changing of inessages, light strobe affect and the content. How are you going to control the content on that billboard such that it is child appropriate or that they lights changing constantly don't affect my enjoyment in I 3 my own home? My understanding is that billboards are protected speech...does that mean you are going to allow Cannabis and Strip club ads to be visible in our neighborhood. Certainly if you have mitigated this issue we would like to hear about it because that has not been in any of the information we have received. 4 Please advise me as to the next course of action I should take to be heard on this issue. What time and where is the next meeting that this will be discussed? 5 Regards, Robin A.Auerbach President and CEO EdgeMAC 714.564.5621 direct 2125 E. Katella Avenue-Suite 350 Anaheim, CA 92806 www.edgemac.com https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=310b0e61 a6&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f/o3A1617236008633260725&simpl=msg-f%3A161723600... 17/77 THIS PAGE IIVTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Robin Auerbach (AUERBACH) Response to AUERBACH-1 The commenter states general opposition to the project and asserts that people living on the 2500 block of East Coolidge Avenue were not included in the original notices sent regarding the tentative Relocation Agreement between the City of Orange and Outfront Media(sent out October 2017). Please refer to Master Response 1—General Opposition to the Project. Refer also to the "Public Engagement" section of this Response to Comments for more information on noticing. Response to AUERBACH-2 The commenter asserts that those living close to the billboards being upgraded have concerns for their privacy and property values. Opinions about the economic considerations of the project are not within the purview of CEQA Guidelines and.do not require a written response. 'The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review as they consider the project as a whole. In regards to privacy, as stated in the IS/MND on page x�ciii, per OAAA guidelines, the proposed sign, cannot exceed 0.3 foot candles over the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250 feet in any direction. Compliance with this State standard, which is also included as a stipulation in the Billboard Ordinance Update, would ensure that surrounding residences are not adversely affected by sign operation. Response to AUERBACH-3 The commenter expresses concern regarding the constant changing of inessages on the billboards and the strobe light effect. California State Law, the OAAA, and the FHWA all provide recommendations and standards for the amount of time an image should be displayed before it changes. The IS/MND addresses the changing of inessages in Section 1, Aesthetics and Section 16, Transportation/Traffic. As discussed in Impact 1(d), "the Billboard Ordinance Update requires that `each static message or image shall be displayed for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive seconds before changing, and the transition or blank screen time between one display message and the next shall not exceed one second.' The Billboard Ordinance Update would therefore ensure that any billboard converted to LED pursuant to the Ordinance would exceed the relevant State and federal requirements..."10 Furthermore, as mentioned in Response to AUERBACH-2, the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250 feet in any direction cannot exceed 0.3 foot candles over the surrounding ambient light, which would ensure that surrounding residences are not adversely affected by sign operation. The commenter also expresses concern regarding the content of the advertisements on the billboard. lo City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Project-Mitigated Negative Declaration NO.1860-18,page 10. November. 19 This comment does not address the adequacy of the IS/MND. No response is required. Please refer to the City's Billboard Ordinance Update Q&A page (please refer to footnote 5) for more information regarding restrictions on the content of the advertisements on the digital billboards. Response to AUERBACH-4 The commenter reiterates concern regarding the content of the advertisements on the billboard. Please refer to Response to AUERBACH-3. Response to AUERBACH-S The commenter requests more information on the next course of action and the time and location of the next meeting regarding the Billboard Ordinance Update. The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration includes the meeting date, location, and time: 7:00 p.m. on December 3, 2018, in the Council Chambers, located at 300 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866. 20 DOMER November 29, 2018 Page 1 of 2 City of Orange, Planning Commission - Mr. Ernest Glasgow, Chair 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92866 RE: Opposition to Ordinance Amendment for Digital Billboards Dear Chairman Glasglow: My wife and I are writing in opposition to the Public Hearing item regarding Mitigated Negative Declaration 1860-18 and the Ordinance Amendment regulating the conversion of existing billboa�ds. From 2001 to 2017 we lived at the corner of Adams and Sacramento, within visual range of the current � billboard proposed to be converted to digital LED. In November 2017,we moved slightly east to Harding Street but drive Katella Avenue multiple times a day as well as can see the existing billboard from our second story windows. The proposed ordinance does not merit passage because the ordinance fails in its required Findings and the Planning Commission should therefore not adopt Planning Commission Resolution 32-18 as drafted, and instead, recommend to the City Council to deny the ordinance amendments. The basis of any Planning Commission action by Resolution are the Findings. The Findings for this item are weak, if not non-existent, and fail to establish a basis for approval. The Finding attempts to establish that passage of the Ordinance Amendment fulfills goals and objective within the General Plan. They do not. Policy 3.1 of the Land Use Element, does state "Promote 2 development of revenue-generating land uses that help defray the costs of high quality public services." However,this is a policy under the Goal to"Create commercial uses that provide a solid economic base and employment opportunities and identify Orange as an attractive and diverse shopping destination." The goal and policy serve to create and enhance vibrant commercial districts, not to erect digital billboards. The revenue generation that is created by the conversion of a digital billboard is the increased rent to the property owner and hundreds of thousands of dollars to the advertising company, but the residents of Orange do not gain benefit. The idea that the proposed ordinance promotes revenue-generating land uses to defray the costs of high quality public services is absurd. At an average of$76,000 a year,the revenue to the City covers less than 22%of a single Fire Captain's total pay and benefits and a little over 25%of a single Police Sergeant's total 3 pay and benefits. Even use of the "mitigation fee" for one-time uses does not gain the City much, let - alone defray the costs of high quality public services. Unless it is the intent of the City to allow dozens of digital billboards throughout the City, the mitigation fees derived from this issue are de minimis and should not be a driving factor in its consideration. Regardless of the amount,it does not achieve the Land Use Element goals or objectives. The Ordinance Amendment is therefore not consistent with the Land Use Element. As stated in the General Plan,"A key objective for the Urban Design Element is to enhance Orange's sense of place in a manner that reflects the community's values and its deep connection to the history and traditions that distinguish Orange from other cities in the region." The placement of digital billboards sends the wrong message about the community's values and does nothing to distinguish Orange from 4 other cities in the region. The previous ordinance amendments that prohibited billboards sought to remove blight and create a sense that the City was different than all other communities in the Los Angeles area when driving the freeways. The Ordinance Amendment creates the wrong sense of place. Within DOMER Page 2 of 2 the Vision,as printed in the Urban Design Element, it states, "The City will work to improve the quality of life for all residents by providing residential, commercial, industrial and public uses that exist in harmony q. with the surrounding urban and natural environments." A 672 square foot digital billboard adjacent to CONT low density residential does not improve the quality of life and does not provide for harmony between land uses. The digital billboard projects commercial advertising images,rotating every 8 seconds,24 hours a day,into residential neighborhoods and serves as a distraction to thousands of motorists each day. The 5 Ordinance Amendment is therefore not consistent with the Land Use Element. How there is a finding that ties in the removal of static billboards and the erection of a digital billboard to the Economic Development Element is curious. From the General Plan, "The Economic Development Element outlines goals and policies that promote sustainable, market-driven economic growth and activity without compromising the City's identity,heritage,or the quality of life of those who live,work, and play in Orange." While three areas, one outside the City proper,would see the elimination of older billboards, the allowance for a 672 square foot digital billboard affecting hundreds of low density 6 residential homes is not a fair nor equal trade of aesthetics as stated in the Findings. Further,the finding is not consistent with the intent of promoting sustainable, market-driven economic growth and activity. The digital billboard does not create economic activity for the city other than for one individual property owner through enhanced lease payments and the outdoor advertising agency. Most importantly, it compromises the quality of life for many who will live near the digital billboard. The Ordinance Amendment is therefore not consistent with the Economic Development Element. The single finding, comprised of loose parts of three different Elements from the General Plan, fails in every regard and is most certainly not consistent with nor achieves goals of the General Plan. Since the 7 Finding cannot be made to support the recommendation of approval to the City Council, the Planning Commission should amend the Resolution to recommend the City Council deny the Ordinance Amendments. Additional comments for the Planning Commission consideration include that the proposed project is not compatible with surrounding uses at the Katella site. The staff report states that the existing billboards I $ are visible from elevated neighborhoods on the hillsides to the east. That is not correct. The Presidential Street neighborhood bounded by Katella, Wanda, Collins and the 55 Freeway can see the existing billboards from the relatively flat nature of the area. When we lived on the corner of Sacramento and Adams, exiting the side door you could see the billboard by Katella over our fence. As you drive west 9 down neighborhood streets,you can see the billboard. A digital billboard will be ever present and alive at night with its changing advertising every 8 seconds. The same paragraph describes the visual characterof the area as an"urban environment." While planning definitions generally describe any built area,to include cities and suburbs as urban,the reality is that the neighborhoods to be mostly affected by the digital billboard are low density, residential neighborhoods with a high pride of ownership. A digital billboard will affect the visual character of the adjacent 10 neighborhoods and regardless of�photometric studies and brightness control,the fact is that residents will still see a 672 square foot LED movie screen that changes content every 8 seconds. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the proposed Ordinance Amendments to the City Council. The financial impact to the City is not worth the negative 11 consequences of digital billboards. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, /�eK DoNre� �iir poyre� Ken& Kim Domer 1534 N. Harding Street,Orange,CA 92867 Ken and Kim Domer(DOMER) Response to DOMER-1 The commenter expresses general opposition to the project. Please refer to Master Response 1—General Opposition to the Project. This comment also serves as introduction to the comment letter, and the commenter asserts that the Billboard Ordinance Update fails its required Findings and asks that the City Council deny the Billboard Ordinance Update. The Findings are discussed throughout the comment letter and will be addressed in the responses below. Response to DOMER-2 The commenter questions whether the required Findings can actually be made in support of the proposed Resolution. Specifically, the commenter questions whether the Billboard Ordinance Update would fulfill Goa13 of the General Plan Land Use Element, which relates to the creation of commercial uses that provide a solid economic base and employment opportunities and identify Orange as an attractive and diverse shopping destination. The comment does not relate to the environmental document and does not require a written response. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in deternuning whether to approve the project and the accompanying resolution. Response to DOMER-3 The commenter asserts that the money generated by the billboard conversions would not defray the costs of high quality public services. Refer to Response to DOMER-2. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in determining whether to approve the project and the accompanying resolution. Response to DOMER-4 _ The commenter states that converting the billboards sends the wrong message about community values and is not consistent with the Urban Design Element. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in deternuning whether to approve the project and the accompanying resolution. Response to DOMER-S The commenter asserts that the digital billboards would serve as a distraction to thousands of motorists every day. The IS/MND addresses the potential driver distraction in Section l,Aesthetics, and Section 16,Transportation/Traffic. As discussed in Impact 16(d)11 11 City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Project Mitigated Negative Declaration NO. 1860-18,page 58. November. 23 The Updated Billboard Ordinance requires a minimum of 8 seconds of dwell time. Therefore, implementation of the Billboard Ordinance Update would ensure that any billboard converted to LED pursuant to the Ordinance would exceed the relevant State and federal requirements of minimum dwell time, and would therefore avoid any hazards related to driver distraction. In addition, the implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM)AES-2 would turn off the display or turn it black in the event of malfunction or failure. MM AES-3 would require the City of Orange to review and approve each sign's operational lighting parameters to ensure compliance with State codes. Compliance with the requirements in the proposed Ordinance and the implementation of MM AES-2 and MM-AES-3 would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. Please also refer to Response to AUERBACH-3. Response to DOMER-6 The commenter again questions the economic implications of the project and asserts that it would not fulfill the General Plan Economic Development Element's vision of"promoting sustainable, market-driven economic growth and activity without comprising the City's identity, heritage, or the quality of life of those who live, work, and play in Orange."lZ The commenter also mentions the aesthetic trade-off of the project. The economic considerations of the project are not within the purview of CEQA Guidelines and do not require a written response. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in determining whether to approve the project and the accompanying resolution. With regard to aesthetics, the aesthetics impacts of the project are analyzed in Section 1, Aesthetics, of the IS/MND. The IS/MND includes MM AES-1 (requiring a site-specific lighting study to ensure the lighting of signs does not exceed 0.3 foot-candle at 250 feet), MM AES-2 (mandating that billboard conversions be approved by the City as part of the Minor Site Plan Review, and MM AES-3 (requiring review and approval of each sign's operational lighting parameters as part of the Minor Site Plan Review). Implementation of these measures would ensure that impacts related to aesthetics would be less than significant.13 Response to DOMER-7 The commenter reasserts that the Billboard Ordinance Update fails in its required Findings and asks that the Planning Commission amend the Resolution to recommend the City Council deny the Billboard Ordinance Update. This comment does not address the adequacy of the IS/MND and does not require a written response. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their '� City of Orange. 2015. City of Orange General Plan Economic Development Element,page ED-1. December. 13 City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Project Mitigated Negative Declaration NO. 1860-18,pages 5-10). November. 24 review and consideration in determining whether to approve the project and the accompanying resolution. Response to DOMER-8 The commenter states that the project is not compatible with surrounding uses at Billboard Location 1. The IS/NIND describes the existing site conditions and surrounding land uses in the Intxoduction, and the retained billboard locations are depicted in Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map. As described in the Introduction, Billboard Location 1 is within an established urban community that has an extensive history of development. Furthermore, all the retained billboard locations are within the Freeway Corridor, which is the area "within the City comprised of the land within 300 feet of either edge of the right-of-way of the following freeways: California lnterstate 5; California State Route 22; Califomia State Route 55; and California State Route 57.i14 As stated in the Draft Billboard Ordinance, the City would only allow upgrades to occur within the designated Freeway Corridor. As noted in Response DOMER-6, the signs would be required to comply with State regulations governing the operation of LED billboards including the level of brightness allowed to be generated. The State regulations are designed to ensure that signs do not result in substantial adverse effects to sturounding residences. Compliance with the State requirements ensures that the project would not conflict with existing surrounding land uses. Response to DOMER-9 The commenter states that the neighborhoods bounded by East Katella Avenue,North Wanda Road, East Collins Avenue, and California State Route 55 can see the existing billboard at Billboard Location 1. The project's aesthetics impacts are discussed in Section 1, Aesthetics. The IS/MND aclrnowledges that there are residences in the vicinity of the billboards. The IS/MND concludes that the billboards "would not be significantly more visible after conversion to LED due to the proposed brightness standard in the Billboard Ordinance Update."1s Furthermore, MM AES-1 requires a site-specific lighting study as part of Minor Site Plan Review that would ensure the light output produced by any converted billboards would not exceed 0.3 foot-candle at a distance of 250 feet. The commenter expresses concern over the messaging that would change every 8 seconds. California State Law, the OAAA, and the FHWA all provide recommendations and standards for the amount of time an image should be displayed before it changes. The IS/MND addresses the changing of inessages in Section 1, Aesthetics, and Section 16, Transportation/Traffic. As discussed in Impact 1(d), "the Billboard Ordinance Update requires that `each static message or image shall be displayed for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive seconds before changing, and the transition or blank screen time between one '0. City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Project Mitigated Negative Declazation NO. 1860-18,page v and vi). Novcmbcr. ls City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Project Mitigated Negative Declaration NO. 1860-18,page 7). November. 25 display message and the next shall not exceed one second.' The Billboard Ordinance Update would therefore ensure that any billboard converted to LED pursuant to the Ordinance would exceed the relevant State and federal requirements..."16 Furthermore, as mentioned in Response to AUERBACH-2, the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250 feet in any direction cannot exceed 0.3 foot-candles over the surrounding ambient light, which would ensure that surrounding residences are not adversely affected by sign operation. Response to DOMER-10 The commenter asserts that the neighborhoods surrounding Billboard Location 1 are low density,residential neighborhoods. ' Existing land uses are discussed in Response to DOMER-8; please refer to Response to DOMER-8 for further discussion. The commenter also asserts that a digital billboard would negatively impact the visual character of the adjacent neighborhoods. The project's impacts to visual character are addressed in Section 1, Aesthetics, Impact 1(c), and the IS/1VIl�TD concluded that because the LED faces would be more stringent than the standards set forth by California State Law, the OAAA, and the FHWA, the proposed enhancement to LED would not substantially change the existing visual character.17 Response to DOMER-11 The commenter concludes the letter. This comment does not address the adequacy of the IS/MND. The comment is noted, and no response is required. 16 City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboazd Ordinance Update Project-Mitigated Negative Declaration NO.]860-18,pagc 10. November. 17 City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Project Mitigated Negative Declaration NO. ' 1860-18,page 8). Novembet 26 LORIMOR Page 1 of 1 From:Virginia Lorimor<gin.lorimor@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 10:45 AM To:Shelly.Archer@360dg.com Cc:Will Kolbow<wkolbow@cityoforange.org>; robin@edgemac.com Subject: Re: Digital Billboard Hello Will, My name Virginia Lorimor. I was not able to attend the council meeting as I was having emergency open heart � surgery. My husband Brian Rapp and I would both like to reflect the same concerns that Ms.Archer has so articulately laid out in her last email. Now,this most recent communication has left us confused as well?Is there time to stop this hideous digital eyesour that WILL devalue our property on Garfield Ave just E of the 55 freeway?What is the economic benefit to our community?The presidential tract(were we are currently 2 upgrading our home)will be devastated. Is the only part of Orange that the counsel cares about historic downtown? I am saddened by the lack of depth of research and potential outcomes that the council has put into this decision.Having been in commercial development for much of my career-the negative consequences are significant and no one has even spoke to towns that have made this decision to see what their outcomes have 3 been. I am truly disappointed. What can we do at this point?Please advise. Wartnest, Virginia THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK �rginia Lorimor(LORIMOR) Response to LORIMOR-1 The commenter states that she was not able to attend the council meeting and expresses similar concerns as Shelly Archer (these comments and responses are provided in this Response to Comments as ARCHER.1,ARCHER.2, and ARCHER.3). This comment does not address the adequacy of the IS/1VIlVD and does not require a written response. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in determining whether to approve the project. The Planning Commission will consider the Billboard Ordinance Update on December 3, 2018. A date for consideration by the City Council has not been confirmed. Response to LORIMOR-2 The commenter expresses concern about how the conversion will lower property values. Economic considerations of the project are not within the purview of CEQA Guidelines and do not require a written response. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in determining whether to approve the project. Response to LORIMOR-3 The commenter expresses general opposition to the project. Please refer to Master Response 1—General Opposition to the Project. The commenter also requests more information on the next course of action. Please refer to Response to ARCHER.1-1. 29 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK VEATCH Page 1 of 1 , From:Scott and Mary Veatch<mnsveatch@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, November 29,2018 9:58 AM To:Ashley Brodkin<abrodkin@cityoforange.org> . Subject: Proposed billboard located at 1936 E. Katella Avenue Ms. Brodkin, As 18yr residents of the area adjacent to the proposed new Digital Billboards to be located at 1936 E. Katella Avenue, � we must strongly voice our objection to this proposal. Our home is located less than 100'from the proposed signage, and contrary to the provided analysis,we believe that these billboards will negatively impact both the ambient light, as well as the property values within our neighborhoods. I 2 We also find the narrative portrayal of the proposed installation as a single billboard to be a extremely deceptive attempt to mitigate the impact.The proposed installation is for a double-sided billboard,(i.e. billboards) not a single billboard as provided in the narrative of the proposal. 3 We respectfully request that the City reject this proposal, and not allow these monstrosities in our beautiful city. Respectfully Scott and Mary Veatch 2136 E.Wilson Ave. Orange, CA 92867 (714)538-7674 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Scott and Mary Yeatch (VEATCH) Response to VEATCH-1 The commenter expresses concern that converting Billboard Location 1 to LED would negatively impact the ambient light. The project's light and glare impacts are addressed in the IS/MND in Section 1,Aesthetics, Impact 1(d). A site-specific lighting study was not available at the time the IS/NIND was published (November 7, 2018), and the IS/MND evaluated the brightness level based on a similar billboard conversion project in Alameda County. Subsequent to the publication of the IS/NIND, a site-specific photometric analysis was completed and submitted on November 12, 2018 (included as Appendix A of this Response to Comment document). The site-specific study concluded that no light levels would exceed 0.3 foot-candles over the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250 feet in any direction.18 Therefore, the lighting would be consistent with the proposed Billboard Ordinance Update as well as requirements as set forth by California State Law,the OAAA, and the FHWA. The commenter also expresses concern over the impact to property values. The economic considerations of the project are not within the purview of CEQA Guidelines and do not require a written response. The comment is noted and will be provided to the City decision makers for their review and consideration in determining whether to approve the proj ect. Response to VEATCH-2 The commenter states that the proposed installation is for a double-sided billboard and not a single-sided billboard. The IS/MND shows the existing static billboard dimensions and the allowed LED billboard dimensions in Table 2: Billboard Dimensions. As shown in that table, the number of faces for the existing static faces and the proposed LED faces is two.19 Response to VEATCH-3 The commenter expresses general opposition to the project. Please refer to Master Response 1—General Opposition to the Project. le Exp(prepared by Michael Schrupp). 2018. City of Orange,1936 E.Katella Ave-Digital Billboazds Photometric Analysis. Website: http://www.cityoforange.org/DocumentCenterNiew/8012/193 6-E-Katella-Ave-Digital-Bi llb oazd-Photometrio-Analysis. " City of Orange(prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions). 2018. Billboard Ordinance Update Project Mitigated Negative Declaration NO. 1860-1 S,page xxiv). November. 33 Appendix A: Billboard Location 1—Site Specific Photometric Analysis THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 330 N.Brand Blvd.Suite 950 Glendale,CA 91203 818.539.1111 • www.exp.com fs�� City of Orange, 1936 E. Katella Ave. Digital Biliboards Photometric Analysis Pr�ject Idumber 2018081.00 Prepared By: MichaelSchrupp Date Submitted 12 November,2018 City of Orange, 9936 E. Katella Ave. Digital Billboards Photometric Analysis exp Project No. 2098081.00 92 November, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 NARRAT/VE.................................................................................•-•---•-••---......................................1 ' 2.0 APPEND/X-FOOT-CANDLE LEVEL GRAPHIC SHEETS...........................................................3 ii City of Orange, 9936 E. Katella Ave. Digital Billboards Photomefric Analysis exp Project No. 2018081.00 92 November, 2018 1.0 NARRAT/VE We(exp engineering) have conducted a photometric review of the digital billboard being proposed at 1936 E. Katella Ave, Orange, CA.. Using the photometric software AG132,we studied the screen's output brightness to determine the following: A) Potential modifications to the sign that may be needed to comply with the OAAA(Outdoor Advertising Association of America) Lighting Level Guideline, and B) The impact the sign will have at night on the surrounding community. The proposed billboard is to be 14'x48'with the top of the sign mounted at+89'above the ground with maximum screen brightness of 300 NITS (300 Candela per Square Meter)in the evening. Per OAAA guidelines,the proposed sign, displaying a full white image (for maximum brightness) should not exceed .3 foot candles over the surrounding ambient light levels at a distance of 250' in any direction. The photometry used in this study is based on the specified Nichia series 336 LED modules, which output light horizontally at 90° and 45°vertically, at the evening output level of 300 Candela per Square Meter. As we are unable to determine what the ambient light levels will be at the location,the studies were done assuming the worst-case scenario of no ambient light. We have included graphical illustrations demonstrating the light levels in foot-candles we expect from the screen. SHEET 1 of the attachment is a location plan at the 1936 E. Katella Ave. site, indicating the 250' boundary overlaid on a map of the proposed site, as well as the projected relative angle of light emanating from the sign. SHEET 2 shows the overall light levels at the ground,freeway, and adjacent buildings over the entire Langton area. SHEET 3 is a graphic representation of the light levels impacting the adjacent residential buildings around the Langton site. Page 1 City of Orange, 1936 E. Katella Ave. Digital BiJlboards Phofometric Analysis exp Project No. 2018089.00 92 November, 2098 Conclusions We see no light levels in excess of.3fc beyond the 250'radius of the signs, nor do we find any significant impact to the neighboring property provided the sign brightness is reduced after dark to the 300 NIT level. This report, prepared by exp Services Inc., is intended for the exclusive use of the City of Orange, and Outfront Media. Neither exp Services Inc., the City of Orange nor Outfront Media assume any liability for the use of this report, or for the use of any information disclosed in the report, or for damages resulting from the use of this report, by other parties. Page 2 City of Orange, 1936 E. Kate!!a Ave. Digital Billboards Photometric Analysis exp Project No. 2018089.00 92 November, 2018 Appendix Foot-candle Level Graphic Sheets Page 3 � �, *� -. r . � : - � �,.,�..,�.,,.�.x.�.�..�,�.,....r..:..�•_•_.d,,�.�..� . '- x� �- .. � ,,,_,,,�,,,..�. , . . - . �� t � �.. , _. � .. , — � _ � ' ` �� *�' — . �� ..�. .�.;.�.. W. ,.�,..� � �„a,. �,�«.,�,•� �.,w..� �. �•., . � .�:±� s�=�� !�° ��` '�`�� .� „ .. ..� �. -...�. -� •• , , V ,.. � "'v-'a� ��,..,�,� r.�" ' . :. ..L�r ` ' r-.�s� � , . <. . � , , �, '�� s .. ,�� , . �+ �T— a ' . , �� :�8� � � ,�,,, y. � � -� .�� +� /r1 ' ` � ._ -_< . . , „ „�� , . ; ,� . �.// „.�. -; � . � � . :� ' ' �( �N � . . '~ . �,r . �s_.; �,,. � -.. - � � k �� ¢ � , , , , . � , . �ta ... � ' ;� . �° � � .. . . � ;��......�� ' ,r,!'"+ ` ,ac ._ _ . , ' �* � .� ��.� , . �.. � y�_ � •. �,if- ,t,. � .� ' , y- ,,. y . �. �,,. . ., a � $ , . .. �. ,� _ •, . , , � '. . � � , .. �. � , , �: . ��:�,;�.,, _ � � � . . , , � � � r "�„# � � � .;� �-.� ��3 � ' ' . �r . �Y � n � �� . F,. � � .. �qa•"�� .. � K t � � t � �i,� . � ; � � � � e a.. * .. � . .,� �c.',.+! n a . �, _ m � },� � � _ � �� ' � � � �'�' v � x_,Ar�r � .....w�� s � fi.g� . �. j<'� � " � �� ,� :;*�� y � ��? � � �* �$� � , 4! R � � e - �''�' s. �yi+�' .�' .!c r , .� ' �: �.:,, '4 .Ea».�;�' ' t� � � . _ : � q � � . s � �_:..ao1sW:-_ .. ^e.. .d «_, .a+,.=- ±�,.a�� ' ��. 7r.[!'�`- . twm-Y '" . . .vw . ;� _ x � �.+� �. a m • ; ' i ..^ - - ., • . *�A�*� . � . . r . ' ' ,�,'� Z .,,,�""°z h ' -i4�..:,�4 ,� � �,' , ,,�n.,6�"► .. . .., ., .,. . x r. � ` . �` ♦ : i1t„ ` .. r"' � i � � < � �>.�.» .� l ` .,. � . �.�. ` � _ y��*� # � � Y� � 1 � � $ � ,,t.�^ . sk<_ � , s � � � � � , �_ !,� i , ; � � . ' � � � � t :� t� !� „� � a � � � °a � ��.. � *� � � 4 ,. � � � �� _ # . *r.w_#'�A � y�� , r �'� wm.+Fae�a..,.. . . � ... � _ , .� a.�+W�"� ,.a.`�"� .. ,�.�.y�.i Z's�. �....__._.. ._.:_ „� R::""'rr`aM,. ” - �q'j r,. ,� — �#� �.. �� , l� , • , �', 'y�~ . r � , a � :'. �- • ' N Sacramentp St ac., f <�'� � t � `� `+(� �.�0�� r�1t • ��P_ 'K ,,� . ' `" � � ,�+ .. f b ��. *.�y7 A�.� 4�k� " . R. �� ,�r T� ��: n� T�� N � �,,. ��..�� `W�� ~,'�' 1� t ''i _t � ' �. .�i � • S � � � R� � #� y�t .�g.k . , 1 �.�`'�` ' 4 I . a, � .X� P�':. �' �I ��' ,� � ` a �a, �t T '1}.flk"'3�, � ' � '�y <�� w a � �"� 1.� � � y -,� _ tw•� ',t� � _ ;,w,•, �..,�. ��' 'i� 4 � � � �• , �„ , ,,,. �C '"� .� t� ��s..t�; � '�"„�-� �� . :� ,:•,� ��'� . . ,; . �;•�.. f`� �L �f . �� I � 1 � �� _,r'.'�so,... �`'�+ d:' . , , ,w,z , ., +'s � � , . _.��.� .E . �� o _� � �.� J � �'"� _ _ ��S� W�C,Yx• . _ �_.^'G'�'"�ll� ____ _ .��.�F __� . ._ . . _ � .,,� -�n-• �N.w°+�x�+. ....�iw�.r. .,��_�-.w��r� .:1�a'+. Y , ,9 us ... .. Y •].) �' .. , 1� �°J...(yg �. ., . . . .. W. ..�.. . . .. . .� . . .., y � ;�� • '" ' �`�0�T3�',I'�pa�''F!'C'Cth+3�f` _ . .,; ,_ .. ,,,,�a� � �. ,� �' "' -�~ ^ .,. ..,- _._ . �,:: " :�,. W�_._. , . � � 3�,.�..�,,.�.�.,. v:��... ...�,�-,_.,��»...,,�:-r.�y»:---. . �.. . ,� ' - , . �� • . , .� • .. �. � . . ,. .- • ...,-�., ' � � ' ` ;t�� i� ' ` ` ' �. 4_ ,.. w .... . , . . ..•.�� __ .� .r — _. ..T.., �� . ,. x :..'�.��6 �;1e'�„te �Sh��,� sd`+�+'rr�""e''"""r°'t�"� . . . _ _ :��ar��a;r,:,-.r� ..z4/'�� . ��' -a a-� : . , „� �� * ,�761 1�"*^-�......,-.-. T 4e' w ��} [� r•• �..:�t'uw l�w,,,�3 `�� :- +,` ` �"+w�" � "�� .� ' �+��^�- �.� * �'«�l *.7m�- � (p) �,. "` .`:�L�*-�` ,� t•,, � a y ''"' "" r ., �'' ... `i.� n^.°��(� ��yriX^' <.r'r�+�r f � � '�.'` a� (J �... 'P�<] o '` ..,�}� r..1.nr �� ,►��' � � f 1 � ��3�f�� , . . q.t�('s�a ,«^ * u .. . .� ��.� � , �,�* — --�„w� � , P� M , �j�`'� .�, .�.°. �r "F �y .. 3. . . �s J ;�� fl�tm`'�s' �� 4 L "'' • � t'i � , t� • t::i .." ....� . � � �. :�.r*5+�� ' , *� -r"��-'�� ''�t �� , i . � •,• +^�� '„�'�� f - „� ... .t � n s r `r.�. i :�� "A � t �}' - ?� 1 S' 1�f,t * � '' � � �� k �� ,` 4 � f,.,,,.'+, �, �'` ' .,,:�" '�, '� ` � rr 1 +7� t ;�.� ''� �� 4�. + L ! �}r . 1 . , l , �� , � + r.��' �! i `�+f •" 7':+'• Y�+.�c f ♦ V/ �a� �. L� � ,,�',,�'r'w !^''t +1't,e��' �y��. S4.�� .�F �;� ��'' � .,.�'V1 _ � �°'�/�'Y.�."g r�i � � (, �,�,�U�`� '� , `��`' j �. �� ''�*+u:� ��1 ff,� , !. aH � yy ,, . a .p_. « � >r.,p�� i�_'�{�a��R�Li�1°9��ar. .1P` _ t' �7' �p� � � �I .' � ��. � � ,.. ` . .. � f;� `�"' ° � ^ ' .. , f : ,, . _„�.�.�.-, „ , " � i + �;sy"„�a„""'�.` _ *. ' ,,� . ' � +�r � •�` ° 't�: . . .. 0.60 0.53 .45 °��"`0.36 � � ;0.30 I 0.23 • I0.15 � � 0.07 0.00 Illuminance(Fc) �� ,' �� • � • � �� ,� �_ �_ - �� • � � . • � • . . . � � - - .� . � � . �u '} � ��-�r � � +% � �:�•�` �� .,� �1� � .a., . S�y� �:r- ,•'� , . , . �,: "� . �� ,� r � fi - -� '!`"'�"""<� �i" �� y / � �°� � +b A ' . .. ,� . ^ � " �, . s� . , _ ' , ..� ""`� , ' t "` v�"i ��, t„/ � . . . r� � .�+.." � ..' , iY � , s _._ .. . � f �1 �.�„�A�. . � . , .;� '. � r ��_ .,.��.;. -�,,.;_. . �.,�� '�+�,� � �A I�I��r�:r I�Y _ ��W I I� y ^ ��9 �I .+' . � + ] `�n� N r. I ,� , . � , , _. �a�L � � -, �,� y ,}. e+� + Y� �'�°�� ,'� +��, * �� ` � 4 # � �+'�• ��` ,�t ' � 4 . ��` —3 +� E�4,1, �� ,� �. � ` �,�;��:�" � }�� '�` ` ;�, "`" G1�9�3 E�st�Ka�eli_ �.��;.;� � �. . , �f� � ,� x ,, } - w., ��`�;�} "M- � �. t�q� �'L F� � FP ,p 1�. - `�,,;��„��=�. ; ... :- ,��, - ;, ffi + - f �,, � �1h936�East Kateila `�� .�-�,`T'a +� i� , ,�k¢' �N• .�� _!� . �� + �y �� ` I �"' � �,ke � ,f �� y � +Y�".( �^�t, ... '�`�� * � � � "�.�.r :, � �� •'�;. .: ."r,�-�, ,, �rt'A� �, ti ` �y! � ` � ''y�. \ T u ', . ' `e, \ l st r"1P.�v R � . �\�e :, . � ^^w`y ` . '.: �o� ^",�'&"P`�,.... � � ce;. " �� .a��` � "�v��'. �� ,Gk" ^� y'^ a*,' . � �i �„.�q� �t,�! �«y,t 'rt'�.✓�'' „4� � � 'F� M' F��"V �b . 3,„ \b� � .."�.,� � 4 ' � ' 't' . � `�Q � 1; Y�'{�� . � I �� ... ., n.`� ; ' ,�,. -�.' '� � �� V �* - � ,�` ":�i,,,� �' � ,}.^ w �C'��l$ * „ \.y "�� '�"� � ,,, ,�s� }�� , `°� ��, � �: ��t � ,,``�,,, � � �,, ,�, � �� , ,:�� a��' , ��'�� °" � �r �„*., � � � ,: , ..4 �;, �`�*�' � k . I _ ! y,. X��w � � �.� �M�,� "! � j ~ 1 �� i I �} ��,�`^4 `TA � dUr, �1(��"...,re� 1 A{ � � � j �"�'�4y�� 9 :.�;' 7 . �. � �� _,�'M '� , . �;9 . r �, . . �:T _ . _ .r�:�.. _ . . , ; 0.60 0.53 ' � � . 0.45 , "`�.�'� , ,� ,�) �a 38 � . ;0.30 '0.23 i I0.15 . I ' ° . - , _ 0.07 . ' .. 0.00 Illuminance (Fc) � « ��x ,r; • ' • � - a , ' _ • • ' :•� � � � � � � �� • 1