HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-13-2015 - Minutes TCCITY OF ORANGE
CITY TRAFFIC COMMISSION
Minutes of a Regular Meeting: May 13, 2015
I. OPENING
A. Flag Pledge
B. Roll Call
Present - Commissioners: J. Beil, E. Glasgow, M. Lebeau, A. Feliz
Absent - Commissioners: C. Vaughan
Present — Staff: J. Scott, M. Llanes, D. Hoard, D. Allenbach, Sgt'. B. Marcotte, P. Then
C. Introduction of Jacki Scott, the new City Traffic Engineer who comes to us from
the City of Irvine. She briefly discussed her career to date that she has been
working exclusively in Orange County.
D. Approval of Minutes
March 11, 2015 - Approved as published by the Recording Secretary.
MOTION: Glasgow
SECOND: Beil
AYES: Beil, Glasgow
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Lebeau, Feliz
II. ORAL PRESENTATIONS
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
None this month.
e Cityof A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and/or purchase.
ran g e Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 - 5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated. ow
Public Works Department Et7 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes] � Printed On Recycled Paper
Pa 12
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
IV. CONSIDERATION ITEMS
1. Request for the installation of "All -Way" STOP control at the intersection of Larkstone
Dr. and Laurinda Ln.
Deborah Mongan
984 N. Ridgeline Rd.
Orange CA 92869
Commissioner Glasgow - I noticed you did a study for crossing guard on one day. Did you
just pick one day and use it as an average or did you go out there more than the one time in
the study?
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - We had 2 days on the original traffic study when
we are out there we counted everything, including the ped crossings, then when the issue
was continued we did follow -up with another ped count, and at neither time did the
intersection meet the criteria for installation of a crossing guard. It is our policy not to
install crosswalks unless we have some form of positive traffic control, i.e., a traffic signal in
this case a STOP sign.
Commissioner Lebeau - Can we turn to the first page of the criteria for the placement of an
adult crossing guard, going to section two, I'm trying to reconcile what it says here with the
warrant. "The pedestrian count must be at least 20 elementary school age children crossing
the street on the way to or from school but not a combination of both. Does that mean that
"one way or another" would meet that warrant?
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - It's a minimum of 40 students but not a
combination. You cannot have 25 kids crossing in the morning and then only 15 or so in the
afternoon. It has to be at least 20 in the morning and 20 in the afternoon.
Commissioner Lebeau - I'm still trying to go through the standard, here it says on the way
to or from school. It doesn't seem like the standard includes both directions, it sounds like
it's one direction or the other. If it was both directions on the way to school and the way
from school you would think the standard would list it that way, this sounds like it is one or
the other.
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - In that hour, in the morning for example, I
suppose you could have children walking across the street in a different direction, however,
if they are crossing the street and particularly on the leg that has no protection and they are
counted during that time and if that number comes up to 20 or more, then that's an
indication perhaps that a crossing guard is needed at this location; the same is in the
afternoon. We don't care what direction they are going as long as they are crossing the
intersection.
3 Cityof A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Department I�
077 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes ;� Printed On Recycled Paper
Pa {L- e 13
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
Commissioner Lebeau - I think you are misunderstanding the question. If the answer is
that it requires both directions you would think it would say, "20 elementary age school
children per hour crossing the street on the way to and from school ", in which case it would
be 20 students in the morning and 20 students in the afternoon. The way the standard is
worded here it makes it sound like that as long as you have 20 in one of the 2 directions then
you have met the standard when you use the word 'or'. If the standard is "and" I get it, and
it's not met here, but if the standard is "or" you could argue that it was met here when you
have 21 in the afternoon.
Chairman Beil - I think this actually meets the standard reading the "or ". Now if the issue
is that the wording doesn't fit the way the program criteria is set up I think maybe Public
Works needs to change the wording on that sentence.
lacki Scott, City Traffic Engineer - When reviewing this item last week I actually asked the
same exact question. It seemed like it has been applied the way Dave is explaining it to us,
where it was both the A.M. and P.M. had to meet the minimum 20, that's the way the
program has been applied in the past and that was the intent of the program. We can
certainly change the language on the form and make it clearer for everybody.
Commissioner Lebeau - As the standard is written now having 20 in the afternoon would
meet the standard, because it's disjunctive. In this case if the standard is meant to be
interpreted as both the AM and the PM transit times then by all means the answer is no but
the way it is written here I think the answer should have been yes and the standard needs to
be revised, I get that.
Oral presentation is based on the written staff report; please refer to your copy. Chairman Beil
opened the public hearing for the following discussion.
Erin Mongan, 984 N. Ridgeline Rd. - I am a 6 grader at LaVeta Elementary School but I
think the corner is very unsafe because it's really hard to cross the street when it's busy,
especially when we're coming out of school because all of the parents are there at the same
time, and I've almost been run over. When the cars are parked too close to the curb I can't
see around the bumper, and there have been cars going through there too fast and they
don't stop at the STOP sign I have almost been run -over that way. I think the STOP signs
and the red curbs would be really helpful to keep people safer.
Deborah Mongan, 984 N. Ridgeline Rd. - I started all this. I appreciate Dave going out and
taking another look at this intersection again. I'm certainly no traffic engineer but I've had 3
years to sit at this intersection. I don't know the traffic laws but I do know sitting there and
watching it for 3 years, I'm highly observant and over - educated and I've got nothing to do
but sit in my car and watch cars go by until she gets out with her backpack. I have seen the
problems. I really appreciate even considering a 4 -Way STOP. I understand your criteria. I
did read the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and I'm still bothered by the criteria
the cookie - cutter must fit in these and my concern before was that there had to be some
subjective way to evaluate an intersection like this so it doesn't meet the letter for the three
g Cityof A digital recording of this City Tragic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works DepartmentI!
277 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes �� Printed On Recycled Paper
Pa4;e 14
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
considerations and I did a little research and I found another school in Temecula that had
the same issue because there was intersection like this that didn't meet the traffic volume
and visual issues but because it was a changing neighborhood with a school in it they were
able to go ahead and put in a 4 -Way STOP. Their facts are a little different it was a building
in a new neighborhood not an old one like this one. If it's not ready for a 4 -Way STOP at
least the red curb will help, it's better than nothing. I still think a 4 -Way STOP would solve
a lot of the problems that I see there. I understand your concerns my issue is the abstract
statistics of it all. I don't believe a 4 -Way STOP will necessarily make this intersection more
unsafe. But I do understand that you can look at it with statistics and on the abstract and
the grander scheme and those are the criteria that you apply. I would still love to see a 4-
Way STOP here, I think it would solve all the problems that we have experienced over the
last couple of years. I think a red curb is a great start and it will help alleviate the issues we
do see.
Chairman Beil closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for further
discussion and a motion.
Commissioner Lebeau - Going back to the day you did your traffic counts for the crossing
guard and cross - referencing that with Ms. Mongan's letter of 12- 18 -14. It seemed like the
first day back from the winter break was Monday the 12th and these traffic counts were
accumulated on Tuesday, January 13th, which would have been the second day back to
school. It seems like that may not have been the best day to do a traffic count in that areal
especially if parents have kept their children over the length of the winter break. I'm in
agreement with Mrs. Mongan that the intersection needs help, I'm wondering if further
consideration of the warrants for a crossing guard would be appropriate.
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - The numbers are low, we did check and verified
school would be back in session. We do three (3) counts. In a case like this where we have
an intersection adjacent to or in proximity to a school, because a school's peak is not
necessarily the traffic peak. As far as a STOP study goes we will do an A.M. peak hour
which is generally between 7:30 -8:30 A.M. and we will do a study during the afternoon
release time which is generally between 2:00 - 3:00 pm and then count again in the P.M.
peak hour which is between 4:30 -5:30 P.M. Minimum entering volume at an intersection is
250 vehicles for both peak hours. In this case neither of those 3 count times were even close,
in fact in the evening when people are coming home from work the intersection was well
below the 250 vehicle threshold. Counting there a week later would not have made the
difference of almost 100 vehicles. So we do these traffic counts during the worst case
scenario which is when school is in session. In this instance we found it wasn't close to
meeting our criteria and furthermore, I believe the crossing guard warrant is 350 vehicles
entering the subject intersection during the time the kids are going to and from school as
well; again the intersection did not meet the criteria for consideration of an All -Way STOP
or a crossing guard.
g City of A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this re ard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Department
May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes 6 Printed On Recycled Paper
Page 15
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
Chairman Beil - Does that answer it for you Michael?
Commissioner Lebeau — Not entirely.
Chairman Beil — I agree with Dave as far as the criteria for at least 300 vehicles per hour and
it's nowhere near that.
Commissioner Lebeau — I understand. Thank you.
Chairman Beil — I don't know if that would have made a difference on the student crossing
counts.
Chairman Beil closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for further
discussion and a motion.
Commissioner Glasgow — It would be great to put in STOP signs where we can but this is
for 1 1 /2 hr. in the morning and 1 1 /2 hr. in the afternoon there are 21 other hours that people
are going to be driving up and down that street and it's more burdensome to them on a
street that really doesn't warrant a STOP sign. I think the red curb will help it will alleviate
some problems on that corner, and maybe even have an officer out at the corner every once
in a while in the morning and afternoon to police that.
Commissioner Feliz - I just wanted to say that I was able to go out during the am and pm
peak times and did some pedestrian counts of my own just to see because I'm new to all
this. The pedestrian counts I observed were a lot lower in the afternoon than what David
saw the day he was out. I agree that we should revisit the warrant issue and the criteria
needs to be revised and the wording as well.
ACTION:
1. Denied the requested All -Way STOP.
2. Revise language on the standard so it clear to everyone.
3. Approved the installation of 20 ft. of red curb on the north side of Larkstone Dr. at
Laurinda Ln.
MOTION:
E. Glasgow
SECOND:
J. Beil
AYES:
Unanimous
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
�3 Cityof A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Departmen
Et7 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes �� Printed On Recycled Paper
Page 16
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
2. Request for the installation of additional red curb markings at the intersection of Glassell
St. and Culver Ave. and to modify the pedestrian flasher at the intersection.
David Sarni, M.D.
392 S. Glassell St.
Orange CA 92866
Oral presentation is based on the written staff report, please refer to your copy.
Chairman Beil - I think you are right on about the flasher idea and pursuing that it's not
only that the regular drivers ignore them but the people who don't drive down Glassell St.
that often actually stop at these intersections because they see the flashers and cause safety
and traffic problems which confuses the cross - traffic at the STOP signs of Palmyra and
Culver, so it's an interesting issue. You guys are right on about that.
Commissioner Feliz - Do we know what the length of the red curb is on the northwest side
of Culver?
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - It's about 60 ft.
Chairman Beil opened the public hearing for the following discussion.
Jeff Frankel, 384 S. Orange St . - We met with Dave Allenbach and we came to the conclusion
that all 4 corners should be required to have red curb. I personally have walked across this
crosswalk many times. You can't be seen because there is a car parked, right now on the
northeast corner is a green curb so potentially a car could be parked there and I think that
goes back to when the use of that building was a market, it's no longer that use so there
won't be people pulling up briefly and running in and out. The other corners have red curb
but in our discussion they aren't long enough, they don't extend far enough for the speed
limit now that it's been changed on Glassell St. The flasher modification we thought was a
good idea, and it's completely up to the Traffic Commission and the City. If we could get
those red curbs in and give the motorists additional visibility at that corner would be great
because it's almost impossible to cross that street you have to jump out in front of a car to
have them stop and I think having the flashers on all the time, people get used to that and
when they are activated I think that would be a plus.
Commissioner Feliz - I see the need for the red curb they are asking for another 20 ft. but I
travel north on Glassell every morning at 5:30 a.m. and I see that whole roadway is
completely full every morning. I would want to see if there is a possibility if we are going to
remove one parking space to see if we could get at least one back on Culver, that area over
there is pretty impacted. There is 60 ft. of red curb between the corner and the driveway.
Chairman Beil - That was existing red curb on the north side of Culver west of Glassell, is
that what you are referring to?
Commissioner Feliz - Yes.
` City of A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Department I�
P77 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes �� Printed On Recycled Paper
Page 17
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
Chairman Beil - I don't have the history in front of us of looking at the reasoning that
request was approved and installed. Dave might be able to talk about sight distance to the
driveway with cars turning right at the corner.
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - I can't tell you exactly when that request was
approved as it was such a long time ago. For those very reasons at the time parking
demand may have changed in the area. It's hard to say but at the time this was approved
there was a high demand for parking on Culver west of Glassell, and we initially had about
20 ft. of red curb at the intersection and then people were parking up to the driveway
limiting sight distance for patients coming out of the parking lot in the back of the medical
building.
Chairman Beil reopened the public hearing for further discussion.
Dave Sami, M.D. - 392 S. Glassell St . - There is a Children's Hospital Clinic on the first floor
and I run a division of the Veteran's Hospital. We get a lot of handicap vans and kids
coming in with wheelchairs. Today I had 40 patients so there is a lot of traffic going through
there and I think the red curb is really important for safety and sight distance.
Chairman Beil closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for further
discussion and a motion.
Chairman Beil - We have a motion, and a second, and I think you were trying to amend that
motion.
Commissioner Lebeau - Based on Dr. Sami s testimony just now I'm not inclined to amend
the motion. I think that if there is a sight distance issue at that driveway that it's
appropriate to leave the red curb at Culver. We don't have the rationale that the Traffic
Commission considered when they approved that red curb so I not inclined at this time to
amend my motion.
ACTION: Approved the installation of 20 ft. of red curb on the northwest corner of
Glassell St. and Culver Ave.
MOTION:
Lebeau
SECOND:
E. Glasgow
AYES:
Unanimous
NOES:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
Cityof��rr A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
L an g e Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Department !f
En7 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes �� Printed On Recycled Paper
Pa ie 18
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
3. Request for the installation of a loading zone in front of Fletcher Elementary School
located at 515 W. Fletcher Ave.
Rebecca Nelson, Principal
Fletcher Elementary School
515 W. Fletcher Ave.
Orange CA 92865
Oral presentation is based on the written staff report; please refer to your copy.
Chairman Beil - Adam and I have the exact same question so I went ahead and looked up
the MUTCD on what can be done in red zones, and it looks like you have covered it all. As
long as it is marked or signed as a 'BUS' loading zone. One other questions I have, the
existing entry and exit kind of drop -off area by the district in front of Fletcher has the
sidewalk and curbed area with that 94 ft. of white curb area. The only thing I was curious
about there is if we have specifically set a time limit on that since it's loading and unloading
only and yet I see vehicles parked in that white zone.
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - I asked the Principal about that, it was our
concern as well, and she informed us she had been working with the Police Dept. and had
been able to get the area cleared out so there was not any long -term parking, but again it is a
loading zone so if you are there for 5 minutes while you are picking up or dropping off you
can do that there's nothing and they seemed to feel that the existing white zone was
working for them. If it is I think we prefer to take a minimal approach to this and leave the
white curb as it is, if there is an issue with vehicles continually parking there, if they would
like to make another request at a later date and maybe have that area painted red as well,
we could do that.
Commissioner Beil - I don't think it needs to be painted red. I'm curious how our police
officers would enforce during school arrival or drop -off are in the morning and someone
parks there, during the middle of the day they are letting people park there. There's no
specific signing on the times for pick -up or drop -off. Whose discretion is it to say I can park
there or not. That is the question that I'm thinking of. What we're doing by consideration
of approving the red we are taking away more parking in the area, my personal feeling is
that I'm supportive of creating the bus loading area by putting in more red. But I'm also
looking at this additional parking area here in the white zone. It appears to be during the
school day but somehow the vehicles are leaving during pick -up and drop -off, so I'm
curious how that is being discretionally enforced.
Dave Allenbach, Transportation Analyst - As far as enforcement goes you would have to
talk to my associate in back of me. When we were there taking measurements there were
buses waiting for the kids in the afternoon. We could sign it, but again because it is a
loading zone the sign would be 5 MINUTE PARKING and it comes down as to how it's
enforced at that point.
g Cityof A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Department If
ED May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes �� Printed On Recycled Paper
Paz_Ye 19
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
Chairman Beil - I'm not going to make a recommendation to do anything but it arouses my
suspicious when I started looking at the various color of the curbs in the area and the
signing.
Chairman Beil opened the public hearing for the following discussion.
Marty Adair, 2444 American Way - It's one thing to say or be concerned about how the
people of a community park, but the big thing is these children are more than important
than some commercial or industrial or private car being able to park there. I believe that
needs to be red along there. Sometimes these signs get knocked over, pushed over, they are
more expensive to put up; just make it all red. It's one thing for me to tell you what I think
but I'm going to tell you what I've done, as you look at this you see where American Way
street is, we gave that property to the City back in the late 1970's because we did not want
that school to have this Southern Pacific road run right into the school. We said we'll give
our property here and we got to name the street, 'American Way' and the other one that is
perpendicular to it 'Freedom Ave.' we didn't think we were going to get killed for having to
pay about a quarter of a million dollars for the paving of that street. I would not change the
fact that we need to keep it safe for the schools. The teachers are the molders of America's
future and the parents are that from the very beginning. We need to keep these kids safe.
When you look at what's on American Way and Freedom Ave you will find that there is a
great deal of parking from all the people over on Batavia St. now any of the property on
American Way about the southwest property, about 5 acres, any of the tenants that sign a
lease with us have to provide parking for their employees on their site not on the street.
Likewise you will see that we have a parking lot on our property and we tell the parents
over at the school can park in our lot for school events because we want it to be safe for
them. There is a great deal of parking during the day on American Way but that is a
separate issue to be dealt with at another time. I feel we need to keep this neighborhood
safe. I want to commend the lady crossing guard that sits there on the south side of
Fletcher.
Rebeca Nelson, Principal at Fletcher Elementary School, 515 W. Fletcher Ave. - I want to
thank Mr. Allenbach and Mrs. Adair for pretty much addressing all of our major concerns.
We have grown by 20% and we've had about 5 accidents accessing our parking lot or right
out in front of the school because of the congestion we have. We've reworked that pass -
through driveway that used to be used by our busses and now parents can actually pull in
and have a safer place to drop off the kids. With that we had to bump the busses to that
loading zone so we worked with the police officers to keep that clear, we also put out cones
to help facilitate that because people don't always observe the white zones are right before
our pick -up and drop -off, we just put out cones for our busses. Even with that we still have
a lot of congestion and there really isn't enough drop -off and pick -up space for our families
to safely kid their children.
Chairman Beil - Do you have a pretty high percentage of bus kids compared to a lot of the
other elementary schools?
Cityof A digital recording of this City Traffic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Department If
2!7 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes 1 L# Printed On Recycled Paper
Pai4e 1 10
Minutes of a Regular Meeting City Traffic Commission May 13, 2015
Rebeca Nelson, Principal — Currently we have 3 busses and our special education program
is growing from this year to next year, we are adding another special education classroom at
Fletcher which will bring another bus to us so we will have 4 busses. That space will be
very welcomed.
Chairman Beil closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Commission for further
discussion and a motion.
ACTION: Approved the staff recommendation to install the red zone for the bus drop -off.
MOTION: J. Beil
SECOND: A. Feliz
AYES: Unanimous
NOES: None
End of Consideration Items
V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
None this month.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
After discussion of today's Agenda the City Traffic Commission meeting was
concluded, and as there were no further requests for action under Oral Presentations,
the Chairman adjourned this session of the City Traffic Commission.
The next meeting of the City Traffic Commission is scheduled:
5:30 P.M.
Wednesday - June 10, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
Phyllis Then, Recording Secretary
Traffic Engineering Division
12then@1cityoforange.91g
CITY OF ORANGE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
300 E. CHAPMAN AVENUE
ORANGE CA 92866
PH: (714) 744 -5536
FAX: (714) 744 -5573
Cityof A digital recording of this City Tragic Commission meeting can be made available for your review and /or purchase.
ran Please contact the Recording Secretary at (714) 744 -5536 in this regard, advance notice is appreciated.
Public Works Department If
2�7 May 2015 [N:/PublicWorks/Traffic /CTC /2015 Minutes �� Printed On Recycled Paper