HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR - ZCG-1274-14 - CONSTRUCTION DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS 2025 NORTH ORANGE OLIVE ROADAGENDA ITEM
November 10, 2015
TO: Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
THRU: Rick Otto
City Manager
FROM: William Crouch
Community Development Director
ReviewedNerified
City Manager C 1
Finance Director
To Be Presented By: Jennifer Le
Cons Calendar
_ City Mgr Rpts
Council Reports
_ Legal Affairs
Boards /Cmtes
X Public Hrgs
Admin Reports
Plan /Environ
1. SUBJECT
ZONE CHANGE NO. 1274 -14, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17758 (TTM 0033 -14),
MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 0778 -14, DESIGN REVIEW NO. 4749 -14 AND
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIION NO. 1837 -14 — ORANGE -OLIVE
RESIDENTIAL, 2025 NORTH ORANGE -OLIVE ROAD.
2. SUMMARY
The Applicant, MBK Homes, proposes to construct 25 detached single family residential
condominium units on a 2.33 -acre portion of a site addressed 2025 Orange -Olive Road. A Zone
Change is being requested to change the site zoning to R -3 (SP), Multiple - family Residential
(Specific Plan) and to establish the Orange -Olive Specific Plan. A Tentative Tract Map is proposed
to subdivide the property for condominium purposes.
3. RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve Council Resolution No. 10907, approving and adopting Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 1837 -14 including a Mitigation Monitoring Program, in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
2. Approve First Reading of Ordinance No. 09 -15, approving Zone Change 1274 -14, changing
project site zoning from Limited Business (C -1) to Residential Multifamily- Specific Plan (R-
3 (SP)) and approving the associated Orange -Olive Residential Specific Plan.
3. Approve Council Resolution No. 10908, approving Tentative Tract Map No. 17758 (TTM
0033 -14), Major Site Plan Review No. 0797 -14 and Design Review No. 4776 -14 for the
Orange -Olive Residential Project.
ITEM W '� 1 11/10/15
4. FISCAL IMPACT
If approved, the project will not have a direct fiscal impact to the City as the proposed project and
all associated infrastructure would be fully funded by the project Applicant. There would be an
incremental increase in revenue to the City associated with annual residential property taxes for
the proposed 25 units. There may also be incremental expenditures related to providing police,
fire, parks and other public services for 25 additional residential units. These indirect fiscal impacts
are offset by payment of development impact fees, which are paid by the Applicant prior to
building permit final.
5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL
3. Enhance and promote quality of life in the community
a) Support and enhance attractive, diverse living environments.
6. GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
The proposed Zone Change from C -1 to R -3 (SP) brings the site's zoning into compliance with its
Low Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation. The zone change would
rectify an existing General Plan- zoning inconsistency and the proposed development of the site
for residential use would implement the land use vision outlined in the General Plan Land Use
Element. The project is also consistent with the General Plan's goals and policies including:
Land Use Element Goal 1.0: Meet the present and future needs of all residential and business
sectors with a diverse and balanced mix of uses.
• Land Use Policy 1.2: Balance economic gains from new development while preserving the
character and densities of residential neighborhoods.
• Land Use Policy 1.4: Ensure that new development reflects the existing design standards,
qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development.
Housing Element Policy Action 7: Facilitate infill construction.
Urban Design Element Goal 6.0: Encourage contextually appropriate infill development projects
and property renovations.
ITEM 2 11/10/15
7. DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
Existing Site
The project site consists of a single parcel located east of Orange -Olive Road, north of Taft Avenue
and south of Meats Avenue. The site is 2.775 acres in size. The lot extends to the centerline of
Orange -Olive Road with 0.445 -acre of the property dedicated as public street easement. The site
is currently developed as a paved lot used for recreational vehicle storage. The site contains a small
business office, light standards, a freestanding sign, a CMU perimeter block wall, perimeter chain
link/barbed wire fencing, a tube steel entry gate, a driveway on Orange -Olive Road and a
landscaped front yard setback.
Specific uses surrounding the site and their corresponding zoning are as follows:
North - Two story apartment complex and other multi - family uses in a Multi- Family Residential
(R -3) zone.
South- Commercial strip mall in the Limited Business (C -1) zone. Further south is Grove Avenue,
Shaffer Park and City Fire Station No. 3 which is zoned C -1.
East - Single family residences (predominantly one - story) in a Single Family Residential (R -1-
8) zone. The Fairmeadows Eichler Tract is located approximately three blocks to the
southeast.
West - Orange -Olive Road, railroad tracks and primarily warehouse and manufacturing uses in
the Light Manufacturing (M -1) zone.
Proposed Proiect
The project is a request to develop a 2.33 -acre site (currently used for recreational vehicle storage)
with 25 detached single - family residential condominium units. The proposed units are configured
in six distinct clusters on the site, with each cluster planned around a common "motor court" area
that takes access from a central private access drive. The private access drive includes curb, gutter,
five foot sidewalks, parking, and intermittent landscaped planters on both sides. A total of 50
garage spaces and 22 guest parking spaces are provided onsite.
Detailed information about the unit types and floor plans are provided in the Planning Commission
staff report in Attachment 8. Each unit has a private rear and side yard (provided as an "exclusive
use" area) with a 6 foot high fence. The units are designed in one of four (4) architectural style
types that draws elements from, and are inspired by, Irving Gill architecture.
Site access is from Orange -Olive Road. A landscaped setback is provided at the interface with
Orange -Olive Road, along with decorative pavers at the entry. Landscaping is proposed along the
Orange -Olive Road frontage, along the private drive aisle and in landscape pockets between units.
ITEM 3 11/10/15
Common area landscaping would be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA) while
landscape and hardscape in private yards would be installed and maintained by the homeowner.
The landscape palette is a mix of low - water -use groundcover, vines, shrubs, and trees that
complement the contemporary architectural style.
Zone Change
The Applicant is requesting a Zone Change to change the site's zoning from Limited Business, C-
1, to Multi - family Residential (Specific Plan), R -3 (SP). The R -3 zone is intended for multi - family
residential uses such as apartments, condominiums, and townhomes and allows single family
residences, duplexes, and multifamily dwellings as permitted uses, among other uses.
The site has an existing General Plan designation of LMDR, which allows for residential
development of 6 to 15 dwelling units per acre. According to Table LU -3 in the General Plan Land
Use Element, residential zoning districts including the R -2 and R -3 zones are compatible with the
LMDR General Plan designation. As such, the site's existing C -1 zoning is not consistent with its
existing General Plan land use designation. The proposed Zone Change would bring the zoning
into consistency with the City's General Plan. Further, the project proposes a residential project at
a density of 10.7 dwelling units per acre which is within the range allowed under the LMDR
General Plan land use designation and the R -3 zoning.
Specific Plan
In association with the Zone Change to R -3 (SP), the Applicant is requesting approval of the
Orange -Olive Residential Specific Plan. The Specific Plan provides for a uniform set of
development standards and design guidelines applicable to the site. The Specific Plan incorporates
development standards similar to the R -3 standards but modifies the standards to accommodate
the proposed project and the detached condominium product type. There are key differences
between the R -3 and Specific Plan development standards in the following areas: lot size, lot width,
lot depth, setbacks, lot coverage /floor area ratio, distance between buildings, building height,
minimum usable open space, required parking and provisions for additions and patio covers. A
detailed comparison of the development standards is provided in the Planning Commission staff
report included as Attachment 8 to this report.
Tentative Tract Map
The Applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map for Condominium Purposes to
establish common areas and private "exclusive use areas" on the site. The proposed tract map
establishes common areas that include the private drive aisle, curb, gutter sidewalk, common
landscape areas, and common motor court areas. Exclusive use areas are established to provide
private rear and side yards for each unit and in some cases a private porch or courtyard area at the
entry of the unit. The Tentative Tract Map has been reviewed and found in compliance with the
Subdivision Map Act and Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Title 16, Subdivisions.
ITEM 4 11/10/15
Environmental Review
An Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The MND concludes that the
project will have less than significant impacts to the environment with the implementation of
mitigation measures related to cultural resources (potential for undocumented buried resources
unearthed during grading activities) and noise (requirement for sound - attenuated windows on the
second floor of units fronting Orange -Olive Road). The MND is included as Exhibit C to this
report. In addition, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared and is
included as part of Attachment 1 (Resolution) to this report.
The MND was circulated for public review for a 20 -day review period between August 28, 2015
and September 16, 2015. A Notice of Intent (NOI) was filed with the Orange County Clerk, posted
onsite, mailed to 59 property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the project site, and published
in the Orange County Register on August 28, 2015. The Initial Study /MND and the Specific Plan
were made available online and posted at City Hall and at the Taft Branch Library and the Orange
Public Library and History Center for review. No public comments were received during the
CEQA review period.
Committee and Commission Review
On July 1, 2015, the Design Review Committee (DRC) performed a "preliminary review" of the
proposed project. The DRC reviewed the subject proposal again at their September 2, 2015
meeting, and recommended approval of the project subject to conditions by a vote of four ayes.
Minutes from both meetings are provided as Attachment 9 and 11, respectively. It should be noted
that the Applicant revised the project plans following the DRC meeting to comply with the DRC's
design - related conditions. As such, although DRC Conditions are listed in the Council Resolution
(Attachment 3), the plans included in the Council packet have already been revised to comply with
the majority of DRC conditions.
At the October 5, 2015 Planning Comission meeting, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the project to the City Council subject to conditions of approval by a vote of 4 ayes
(one absent) At the meeting, two members of the public spoke and commented on the interface of
the project with the adjacent single family residences to the east. The speakers requested a row of
trees to be planted along the eastern property line to provide greater screening. One email comment
was received and was provided to the Planning Commission for consideration. The email comment
expressed concerns regarding the adequacy and long -term management of onsite parking and
landscape screening along the eastern property line. In making their recommendation, the
Planning Commission added a condition (Condition 14 listed in Resolution 10908, Attachment 3)
which states that when the final landscape plans go to DRC for final approval, DRC "shall consider
additional screening opportunities, particularly along the project site's interface with adjacent
single family residential properties to the north and east ". A copy of the meeting minutes are
provided as Attachment 6.
ITEM 5 11/10/15
Public Comment
One email comment (which was provided to the Planning Commission, described above) and two
additional email comments were received by staff and are provided to the City Council as
Attachment 13 to this report. The comments reiterate the request for the Applicant to plant
landscape screening along the eastern property line.
8. ATTACHMENTS
Attachments to Report:
1. City Council Resolution No. 10907
2. Ordinance 09 -15
3. City Council Resolution No. 10908
4. Project Location Map
5. Site Photographs
6. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for the October 5, 2015 Meeting
7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 31 -15
8. Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 5, 2015
9. Design Review Committee Final Minutes for the July 1, 2015 meeting (preliminary review)
10. Design Review Committee Staff Report Dated July 1, 2015 (preliminary review)
11. Design Review Committee Final Minutes for the September 2, 2015 meeting
12. Design Review Committee Staff Report Dated September 2, 2015
13. Correspondence from Members of the Public
Exhibits:
A. Plans and Exhibits
B. Orange -Olive Residential Specific Plan
C. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1837 -14
cc:
Sunti Kumjim, MBK Homes ( suntikumiimgmbk.com )
Kye Evans, MBK Homes (kyeevans @mbk.com)
Greg Shannon, Property Owner ( Greg. Shannon @ozarksmedicalcenter.com)
ITEM 6 11/10/15