HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR - APP-0533-14 - PART 5 EXHIBIT A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 1818-09 � ��
� � o 0 0 o w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w W o 0 0 0 0 0 �ij
� � c ❑ ❑ c � c c c c c c c = c c c �, � c c ❑ c c c �o
rn
� � mN
c �
0 0
�ia � � r, v �n �o -- � co .� v -- o� � v �n rn o z
�t'�"'�^� 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O O N M M O O T 7 �
O u p�„ � o 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 -- � o o �n �o
p. p Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 o tn
W d
� L
L ^
~ A
� I� � N V1 � � 1� ^ � �D 0� � r--� l� T O� ^-i V1
� O p �p N O M � O O O o0 7 7 N O O
b V � � O O 0 O O O � O O O O N O �O �O
� O O O � O O O � O O O O O O O O O
O W U W d W U Q W d d Gl U U C� W U W W Ll Q C7 Q W
7 a
+r '�
d � Y
V ' y � U U V
•� � � ?� N v�i r�n O� �O N [� V1 01 O 7 V'� 01 l� M �--� M l� V'� N � O� O
O V'i N M �O M N N �n N � � 7 � O� `" O� 7
� O 7 O 7 O� t� 7 O� �n �n oo t� l� oo �O 1� O �O oo ^, O� �n �O
� � p�„ U N o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �; v, o 0
„" o ..
O M
N N
� R �
G1 R. O W U W Q C� W W CO d W O C] Ca U W U Ll Q Q 0.1 W
J ° `�
� �C `u
O ,° �
� C� � � U V �
d p" °J ?; N N r oNo v�i �o � o�o o ^ � `O � v�-, v o�o v�i v�i o 0
� e �, N o �, � � �, .� � � � � � � � � � M �, � �
i d p o v ri o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � f„ o o �
M o
� I�I
C w
I, �
wV, ^ «
�y L O �L �..� Q� Q w �..� Q w Q Q I--i �..� �..� Q � -� w �SI Q� � Q � ro
�0 O a U
� �. x o
a ; �
N y�, � y �O � � �n M � N O� O � �O V � �O N N 7 O M O N y
...... � � Q"' p O `�' �--� V7 --� M O l� N -� N �n N �O .-• 00 0o Q� _
C O M M 7 O� 1� � O� v'� v� 00 [� t� oo �O �O Q� O �D oo ", �n �
C- � � � ,-; m o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �,; �n y � v
p o ►V. N o'�i d E
M M `o
N N e r �
� � � O W U W d W C] W W W Q CO Ll U Ca W W k. W d � d Q ,p ,� o
0
a � x �
L ,� L
CJ � v
!Q C � =
L a+ a � � N .-, � O� �O .-• O O� l� O M M �O oo U c.� .n
C � Cr p N `� I� Q� [� �O �n l� ..• � v� � l� --� �O M O� �n v�i v�i `o
� G C O� N v1 V'� O o0 �O O� �O V1 `O o0 l� 00 �O �O O O 7 00 M l� ❑
� Q U O M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � M O
� a
I �
0
� �
N � R c3 cd c6 R cd c3 iO iO c3 c3 id R c3 c3 id R cC cd c6 c0 c�d c3 c7 .Y
� C C C C� G C C C C � C� G C� G C� G � C C C G C C C C o o ;a
� rO � .y � �. � .y � .N .N � .� .� � .N .� � .N � E O
� � LL
C
� O O
�. m W
h
R a) 7 a � .p o pa O
~ a�i � > c�O O ^ 0 � ? �
� � Q O 'b � p ; S d
Q > Cl. 'C C�' (x � . u
7 7 iC a � 0 O U � c�C C� ro U o � m y
N N C� � � � TC t�d C � O � C R: � O � y �0 0 �
> > G 'e .�C � �O O O = c? O c6 C � � �.5 ��� (O
Q Q 'O 'D 'C U f'L N � U O � y� _,� C
�a ca > > �a > c e°n o cd Q � o ° � v� c�a � y �e�- Q ^
av.E
a� a� a� a� J a� 'O -p 3 � � U C � � � � �o, U.a� U O
°� N ia °� 7 7 °� � � cd � � T C O ca ro U ai y v �,�. cd N
� aG aC c o o � o o �°, o � � c°a � �j �a E > U � � ;� �? y " o Q
� y y � CO W � CO 0..' ` X ¢ � U v� o � � Q o N .� � � � A �-�_.o p � � �
Q � Q o 0 0 o Y � � o � o� -o � � � � � c ❑ a c= ya � c�
�y ro c�d _a ca ca m a p. p, F Q ro � v� U � � � o 0 0 �o�. +,�— I
y .v .o v c ❑ � a �3 ro �O cY. C�' � c�a cC c`a cd r%] � v' ` ,N� .N o ' c�y � �
cC cd � cd � ^-. y cO !/� �
�C o o aC u v� � � � 7 � � � � � a� °' v U c�a � � a�i i � ° T v A �
� � � � c�a c�a c�a c�a > � � a°�i a°�i a°�i x c p� �p � o � rs: cG .:y � �� ? @ aVi
� 3 � � o 0 0 o C � v� v� v� �a � 0] CG � � c� z ' �� °' � " � � � o
� o � � rx G: x cK C] �' � ❑ c a ,°', Q � � :: P_' ._. 3 3 �o z.��= y �a
C C in �n .D '�O 'C 'D 'C a� o N C' C G' � b O O L � N N Q Q o m� y'�9 Q �o
� � R.' u: c�a c�a c�a c�'a c°a y � a3i c�d' c�d cca cd � a3i a3i � � a: CG ° ° °=°?: ;a° Q �m
d H � � x 3 3 3 3 � � x � � � o` � z z ti ti � � a a � ;.�- o
1� G O`� N 9 � Q) Y� �
v U p
u � �o i �
C N M 7 �n �O f� oo O� O N M 7 '� � � � � N N N N N '�—O t°�� � ..�'. O
.. �o.�:'x � U�
�U
� O
p� N
��.• _ �,a`
�" � o 0 0 0 "o 0 0 0 o W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g `0 0
_ _ � c ❑ c ❑ ❑ ❑ �, � c ❑ c c ❑ c c c ❑ c c ❑ c ❑ c a a � o�
a �
on� - � '-
� 3 �m
W tr
p � o
� � a m�
u
L CJ ^" V� v1 O� M � --� M O � 1� O er V M N 7 � O o0 M � M M �n O N a �
bD U �--� O O � .� � -. -. O M O O O O O O O � O O --� O O O O O O
a C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O O O o �
� L � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O O O �
o, U s m
� O
� � w �
R, � o
� O O U O w w W W U d f� O Q (� ¢ Q d U w Q d d U G1 U U d d � �
,`, � U
e
� N M N M V1 l� �--� Q1 00 N N �--� V'� N �--� M �O 1� 01 N M M 7 t� M �--� � y
CJ U � oo V l� O� O� �O l� V 1� U M �O l� N M oo N �--� N 7 O� oo N O v'� oo a
; o0 1� oo Oi Q� 01 �O l� �n O� o0 00 �n oo M v� v1 l� Q� N � 7 [� oo l� l� �n v1 E
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y
� O
�� o 0
d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -
� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � O O O O � � O O O O O O O
Q) � M --� �v'� M 7 N N V l� N o0 00 .--� � O� oo O� �O � � v� .--. O� v� 7 [� o0
�n 7 r �o r t��a� vi
� � v1 7 7 M M M M N V�'� � � M V � � M 7 Vl � � � � �M N 7 M N -
� �
N � c
� C O Ll U C� W W W W U Q W C� Ca d C� d � d' U W � Q Q U Ca U U � � m
� •a� o
J �' o
�
�, 0.1 c
� L � �
R ..� 00 1� V'1 l� O V'1 � 7 � N �O � .-�. 00 .-. M O 01 M O O �--�
� � U M l� M V1 00 00 �A \O N �O N N N M �O 00 N O 7 00 � 3
� � oo t� 00 O� O� O� �O l� v'i U o0 0o v'� 00 M v'i v� [� O� N 7 7 l� oo [� l� �n �n �
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L
� R
� a' ,
� L d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
� v � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
3 � � �� � � � o .� � � o �., � � �, � � � � � � N o � � � -. � � s
� Q 7 M I��n �O l��O oo �n M oo �D --� oo Qi cV O --+ oo c+� O �O N N �o
� > � � 7 M M M M N h 7 7 M � � M <Y V'] � � 7 M N 7 M N �
� w c.
�O/ 0 L
L�. W C
� �.+' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a
C,� •V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .-1 oi
� �y 1� M M �/1 �n V'� M �/1 .-� M M M M M O Vl M M M V1 O V'1 M �/1 V1 M M M � ,,�
•-� a v, �o �c� � ��c� oo �o � �o �c �o v � .o � �o � c�i � �c � � � � � '
Q r� \O � V'1 M M M V� M N Vl V'1 N V1 V� N M V� V1 V'1 M M Y1 M M V1 V� V1 _
a � v �.
:�
,� Q o �
�
�
' �, °> z
Q' � oQ QQ o QQQ Q Q Q Q Q o � o ca o Q Q a o Q Q Q Q o o °'o a
0 R 1� �O �O 7 7 V �O 7 M �O �O �O �O �O V V �O �O �O � N 7 �O 7 7 �O �O �O�
M �l Z v o
O NA
N o�
C >'o �
(C •p -°' a
a� °'
0- � � � 3
� 3 �� >C' o � c o
= cd q� 'O � E ti z
Q� U � ctY y O m`o y
'C 'Lf O O , � T N W a
� N � ro ca .o a on � .B °J c � T
'c3 � c�d > U 3� A
N � V] .D y :G x ai > � � � U � W c�a Q o 0 0 :n
N �o T � .? cc '� 3 Q > �° � °� � � ° � �a `�d 3
� 'a > n. a. o ,o ?? � � � o o � � ' -Y v v°
� a°, o � .= Q � �a � a o °�' a ro c � � � 3 °' � �' �
� � =� o ai a� a� L ^ _ � °' p� o a o e o o � � a� o � r� L o
� uun � W a �' Y > > ro � � � � � � � � z p U Fq ��
� � O °' u U � ai o � � � 'a � � � a c� `� � >. � o � '� � �o a=i �o Q�o�
f0 vv'i � " ° ° 3 ❑ a°i a�i � � � � o � a� a�i H � �° c�a c�e ° c�a � ° '�p > > o p o�
~ c�i� �° v� � .a � U Q d O a� Z � CG � � � o — � U U � � c��i �v � Q �„a g�
p � O N O � O ^C ^C O O � y N 0. ❑ C 7 O Q" cd cd � O � � O � a�� 6�
L '� y � a� N N � 7 � O cO O cC C c6 �.. .� y � � C W � " T�
N 7� O � y` N N X C' p � .--. C' .�". � � ,--� C C N a) Y �
y �t °�' CO :: `d t° b � °J W H a� > � a c� � ,�., .. o ro t �,� 3�o
� o � o Q � � � � v� p„ > ro > � v� Q � � v� rn � 0. � U V o o T.. ,,
❑ � w w = d � .-, w U w w c., w v� � o w a ..
C. V> >' ld C VI O O p N Vl O 4. O Cy. O � � O O O S"" N Q O U y V
a+ V1 T3 . N O N t Y � � � {3� O = Q s 'S^�' Q' � Y � � � � � Y 9 � �.�y
� � � � � � � � O O � � � � c� O cC O N ca 7 7 7 y � � y C � ro v U T.c
� F- v� x v� U a x c U O � Z a� a� ❑ v� F-� o 0 o x U O z v� °
c° `° " �A
V °� T O O
� �y � �y
�C �O� y �.
L 'n � a.
f6 � c� N �c��c
C a cbc T � a�i cv �3 ��j �
O ca � Y � � � � � c��C � Q Cl° � � >,T y � _ ..
� � Q ro v� o � ¢ � a � ❑ a� �,� �.�= o
o. o ce a .o c°°a °c o °' > o cd � = o � �.' co°�
u� a� �a a ^C .n °' � ❑ c °' � .n �_e'` A �n o
C � 't7 — � cd O N y � � O N L' � "�V ,��y '�E �N
� .�. � 3 V] fx ,2 V] U � CA ,Z U .-`�, � :o a.o c � O
�' ��=�^ o i° �Z
� N M 7 V� �O 1� 00 01 O N M V V1 �O [� 00 O� O .--. N M 7 �n �O 1� 00 � =°X `4. �_
� N N N N N N N N N R'N k�� _ a�
5.16 Trensportation and Traffic
Table 5.16-23 General Plan 2030 plus Project Freeway Segment Level of Service Summary
Freeway From To Density� LOS
Northbound AM
SR 55 Chapman Avenue Katella Avenue 30.0 pc/ln/mi D
Katella Avenue Nohl Ranch Road 24.6 pc/In/mi C
Southbound AM
SR 55 Chapman Avenue Katella Avenue >45.0 pc/ln/mi F
Katella Avenue Nohl Ranch Road 36.9 pc/ln/mi E
Northbound PM
SR 55 Chapman Avenue Katella Avenue >45.0 pc/In/mi F
Katella Avenue Nohl Ranch Road >45.0 pc/In/mi F
Southbound PM
SR 55 Chapman Avenue Katella Avenue 34.9 pc/ln/mi D
Katella Avenue Nohl Ranch Road 27.7 pc/ln/mi D
LOS based on HCM methodology,analyzed in the Highivay Capacrry Sofhvare(HCS).
XXX—Mainline segment operates with unsatisfactory LOS.
—Significantly impacted mainline segment.
'—Density is presented in"passenger cars per lane per mile".
Source: Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis.
Project Construction Analysis
Project construction activities would include: grading, building construction, paving, and architectural
coating over a period of approximately 4.4 years. Construction activities include the existing grading and
backfilling activities that will become site preparation upon project approval. The building construction
activity would generate the highest amount of traffic, due to the number of construction workers needed,
compared to the other activities. The building construction would occur after the completion of the
grading phase. In order to provide a worst-case analysis the single-family homes, the age targeted
residential uses, and the recreational uses were analyzed as being built concurrently over a 2.5 year
period.
The building construction phase was modeled based on the construction of 130 single-family homes on
35 acres, 45 detached senior adult homes, 160 attached senior homes, and 60 units of assisted living
senior housing on 17 acres, and an 81,000 square foot recreation center. The building construction would
require up to 133 construction workers and 27 vendor trucks destined to the site per day. The on-site
equipment would consist of one crane, three forklifts, one generator set, one welder, and three of either, a
tractor, loader, or backhoe.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.16-59
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
The building construction phase would have operating hours from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday. In order to minimize impacts on the street network during the peak hours, an average
vehicle occupancy (AVO) of 1.16 persons per vehicle would be required for the construction workers for
a maximum of 115 inbound vehicles destined to the project site in the a.m. peak hour(133 workers= 1.16
AVO = 115 vehicles). The target AVO of 1.16 would be monitored by the site construction manager
through incentivizing workers to carpool to the site. Furthermore, all vendor-related truck traffic to the
site would be limited to occur outside of the peak hours, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
Traffic Volumes
A description of construction operations for the proposed project was provided by the applicant, and
construction trip generation and distribution was determined. Table 5.16-24, Peak Construction Trip
Generation Estimates provides the trip generation estimates for the peak construction phase of the
proposed project.
Based on Table 5.16-24, Peak Construction Trip Generation Estimates, using a PCE of 3.0 for vendor
truck traffic, the peak construction activity (building construction) would generate approximately 392
daily trips, 115 a.m. peak hour trips (115 inbound and zero outbound), and 58 p.m. peak hour trips (zero
inbound and 58 outbound). The construction traffic was added to the 2017 Open Year Condition traffic to
determine construction-related traffic impacts.
Table 5.16-24— Peak Construction Tri Generation Estimates �
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Phase/Activit Size Dail In Out Total In Out Total
Buildin Phase
133
Construction workers(with 1.16 AVO) � workers 230 115 0 115 0 58 58
Vendor trucks� 27 trucks
-without Passen er-Car E uivalence(PCE) 54 0 0 0 0 0 0
-with PCE(3.0 PCE) 162 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL TRIP GENERATION with PCE 392 115 0 115 0 58 58
Trip generation estimates based on operational construction information provided by the project applicant.
'—Some construction workers(18 of the 133)will be required to carpool to the site to minimize tra�c impacts in the a.m.peak hour. A target
AVO of 116 will be required and monitored by the construction site manager. Also,while the construction operations end at 4:00 p.m.,it has
been conservatively assumed that one-half of the workers(vehicles)will be leaving the site during the p.m.peak hour(from 4:45 p.m.to 5:45
p.m.).
z—The 27 vendor trucks will be limited to deliveries outside of the peak hours,from 9:00 a.m.to 4:00 p.m. The deliveries would be evenly
spread over the seven-hour period (four trucks per hour). In addition, a Passenger-Car Equivalency(PCE) factor of 3.0 was applied [o the
trucks.
Source: Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis.
Levels of Service
The Peak Construction Phase a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes were input into the TRAFFIX LOS
software to determine the intersection ICU values for intersections within the City's jurisdiction, and the
control delay, in seconds, for Caltrans ramp intersections within the study area. In addition, roadway
segment volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios were determined per the City's methodology, and freeway
mainline segment LOS was determined using the HCM methodology using the HCS software.
Page 5.16-60 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
Intersections
Table 5.16-25, Opening Year 2017 Plus Construction Phase Intersection Levels of Service presents the
i results of the Peak Construction Phase intersection LOS analysis, while the calculation sheets are
provided in Appendix N, Traffic Impact Analysis, within Appendix H. Based on the peak construction
activity, and the significance criteria of the respective jurisdiction (City or Caltrans) for each intersection,
the proposed peak construction phase would not create a significant impact to the study area intersections.
Roadway Segments
Table 6.16-26, Opening Year 2017 Plus Construction Phase Roadway Segment Levels of Service presents
the Peak Construction Phase roadway segment LOS analysis, while the calculation sheets are provided in
Appendix N, Traffic Impact Analysis, within Appendix K Per the City's criteria,the project would have a
significant impact if the project causes a roadway segment operating at LOS D or better in the baseline
condition, to operate at LOS E or F with the addition of project traffic; or, if the proposed project adds
OA10 or more V/C to a roadway segment that is already operating at LOS E or F in the baseline
condition. Based on the peak construction activity, and the significance criteria of the respective
jurisdiction(City or Caltrans)for each roadway segment,the proposed peak construction phase would not
create a significant impact to the study area roadway segments.
Level of Significance
With the implementation of PDF TRA-1, TRA-2, TRA-3, TRA-5, TRA-6, LUP-1, REG1, REC-6 and
REC-7 and MM TRA — 1, payment of TSIP fees, and the project applicant's construction of roadway
segments and intersections in the City that would be impacted by the project in would be reduced to a less
than significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-3, intersections for Opening Year
2017 plus Project(Impact TRA-2)would be reduced to a less than significant level. With the inclusion of
Mitigation Measure TRA�, roadway segments for Opening Year 2017 plus Project (Impact TRA-3)
would be reduced to a less than significant leveL Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-5,
intersections for General Plan 2030 plus Project (Impact TRA-4) would be reduced to a less than
significant level. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure TRA— 6, roadway segments for General Plan
2030 plus Project(Impact TRA-5)would be reduced to a less than significant level. However, due to the
fact that these improvements are not presently included in the City's CIP and may not be constructed
when needed to mitigate the impact; this impact is considered significant and unavoidable. The
construction of the mitigation measure provided above will not create additional impacts. All of the
mitigation measures will be constructed within rights-of-way as provided by the City's Circulation
Element.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.16-61
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
M U
N �
i
�a ��,�
� �.
�. � R
u � m
�e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a ❑ ❑ c ❑ a c c c a a ❑ c ❑ c c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c � c c W�
r� m��°-
�
O N N �n N o0 M N O� O O N Q� N �
� O � O O O O � O O O O O � O O O O O 7 �
L, � O � O O O O � O O O O O � O O O O O [� oo =
L � O 0 O O O O � O O O O O Q O O O O O O O �
d �
w O
� A o � cv o 0 0, Q. oo � v v� o� �n o v� v v v� c� �
� V � o � o 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o`r'o � V
•� � Q o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
� �`'
w � `o
O L O w Ca U � U ca d W d Q U rs. W n C� Ca Ca Q L1 W ¢ U U Ca �
0
� d � O
� •4 CC � U U U tC
J ^' a C, �A y N M O O� h p� l� 00 Vi N O I� f� M d' �n M y y O� N ',�
m O --� N N O 7 7 N N 00 �O O� 7 N v1 N M 00 v� 7 �--� U
� 7 C Lr � O o0 N o0 1� �D �n O� V� v'� l� O O� I� o0 00 0o v'� oo O� � �--� l� o0
� c o � � .� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � -. o 0 0
r +7 V � "' c�
� '~ 7 ~ v�i
d N L F
m
� � O � O U W U Ca W U Q W W Q Ca W W W W Ll W Q U d 6�7 Q O Ca 5
� � U o ►� „
c C x o
� �
'c � _
(A d a y N y � I� 7 O� O 00 O V1 V1 1n O 7 O Q� N M N � N Vl N �
�D M �D �D O� \O 00 M �D \D 01 V'i M M l� 00 V V N M l� (�j
� Q � r v� o0 0o a n �n a �c �n oo a o a o 0o a v t� v� .-� � o0 0o U •�
Z � ,.'7 o ri o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ': o .: o 0 0 0 o ri ,� o o � �
a Q � `° N � �
c o �
0 oQ
�j L o w �1 � Ca � m ¢ w ¢' ¢ c� w w � Ca G� Ca ¢ p w ¢ � o m
� o '� .� Q
L x � �
�
y � � U
C � R V V U � �
O rl C/ a 7 y � �F O l� O� N .--� Q� �n 7 O .--� 00 l� M M M N � y �
U p O � N N Q� 7 �n .. N o0 �O 00 7 N �n N M 00 v�i �
N � C O M M oo [� �O 7 O� �n �n f� O O� l� o0 00 0o v'� oo O� ,-. I�
� � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "' � y Q
� ,�, a � � "' � d ao z
'^ � � °z E c
�
a C � O U W U C] W U d W C� Q C] W W W W Ll W d U Q W Q a o w Q
N a, o `a '� � o Q
7 O x �o �.
� o
Q. � � U U V �^ � C U
� u N y N �O N O� O l� O� M M V'i V7 V� O� h N [� oo � y � � �U j
I� � p �D V �O l0 O� h 00 7 V'1 �D 00 R N M \D GO M M `" rn p
r C [� N O oo O� t� �n T �D v� oo O� O O� o 0o O� 7 l� �n O � y F*"' �
Q d � O � N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M � '� O O
i. c�'a c� W
� O O �
� � F � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ro
= o � o°�u c°n ❑ a c c c � o��n ao o°n e°n c ❑ � c ❑ a c c ❑ � c o U �
'� V v� '�n �n v� n '�n 'v� '�n '�n ':n 'v� 3 "m > `TV' ci
U �
C. o � °J
O � � � o
�, Q �
I a� �' -0 � .5 �p�
0
� v
� y � �o c ,� �' � � � 'ci `°
N > y O � 'C >, O � vi O.'L7 �
� >
� N N Q � � Q � L' 'C � c�3 � G. U y� c�
U cc U y
�[j a c ac°i � � � �o � o a ° � o U o axi �a y 'o
y > > � E�`�- � � � �a a � � ❑ CL cn o .�' .0 3 �, .,
Q Q -o -o �o �°, U rL� _ � '= u; U o �Y a i° � 'a `� c
� a� a� a�i a�i cd a�i � o � o U Q u, o � �� c°a c � x � o
> �o �o � v� o� ou w.
� e � � �e � a � � 3 � o �a c � � o � � � .'" U ai (a � ° c
g c � � ❑ o o � o o � o � � � �a U �a E > U c�c ° � � N �, c°'i .
R u > Q � � o o � o � � � � a°i o a � � Q ° � `� �a � �' ` -o ro y
�, d � 8 Q o co � ro o > � � � � �? � ❑ �a � c a�v a�
~ �Lu, .�: � L �e �a ro � .ca � p, p., � Q � � v� U � E � � U >, a°�i �
a � •
c ,� •°: � c "' ro � � � _� =� _� a� c�a c� � `�° c�`a � ca � � % � °�' � c X�o
�C ca � � � c� r� ca v> > v� F- v� o � > > s � fb � �o n.,o � `� °' c N
C � .n � � � v� � � � � a�i a`�i a�i W � '� °' U ce � � � ai co a�.� �Y a� h
� � .c � � � � � � � a� a� a� a� .m c o o � o � c� U � � o �a � o
� °� � � Y o 0 0 0 ;: b b .� � � Cq o] � � N W � ❑ °n, °' � � cd •� .
0 o rx rx cG R.' �n va cn v� a, c� c� , z o y v� ��c > u�
� v� � ❑ �' ro �e �a ro °' Q c � ❑ ❑ e ,� Q o o � °: .� .. � 3 '� '-o ���'o �
Q- � '� � � c � c a ° :: o °' °c ❑ c ❑ 'o �° a° N ,.�v C.� C] a� �a :; �� �o
�
c � � R.' c�a ca c� ca c� > � a�i a3i c� c� c�e `° � a3i a3i � � � � a v o a� � >'� ia a� cp N
� �- � � x 3 3 33 ¢ � a x � � � o � z z ti � � � ax w � ° a � b ; ^ o
�
H � >, � �o � 'nZ
�p �--� N M 7 V� �O l� 00 O� O .--� N M 7 �n �O 1� 00 01 O N N N N •�- N Q cd CO CG �
Z
N ULI .-�UX ��
� ��
� �o
� �� ^,n
~ W C C C C C C C C C C C C C C G' C' C' C C C C C C C C C C C ��
C o E p�O
O
,_..�. C � a N
O L O
�Q C qp V 01 .� O O O O� ,� O �' N N -� -� N O �--� O N O O O � O O --� Z
t O a� O O .-i O O O � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O =
o U r� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U
p, � c�' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cn
W y
C
L L
(p � _ � Q w r.Ti U U U U GQ Q Q� (� Q Q U Q Q Q� .� w Q Q Q� �Q Q� Q Q Q Q
� � �
•� L
� 6�i V M 00 N o0 O l� �D O� v� 00 V o0 O� --� -- 00 O� N o0 M f� l� N Qi �O O
O� V O 7 � 00 ,-. 00 �n f� �-. V� N 00 00 M M I� �D O� 'C f� M 00 <+1 7 7
(n � � 00 01 l� l� l� l� �O 7 �O �O V1 M I� N 7 �O �O O� N �D �O V1 t+1 M M
� C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
� C
N °'
�O o0 00 O� O� O [� 7 T Q1 1� V'1 N M �n v� O O O O O �n
d 0 a V'� Q. 01 N N 7 00 N O O �n V1 �O r1 � 7 �n �n � � N O O N O O M
> ; N �n N o0 7 N o0 t� O� M [� 7 O� � V O� O� V N vNi N Q` 00 v'�
Q� ? O M ^' l� 00 01 �O � N V� M O 00 00 � V'1 M M �O �O (+1 Vi 00 M ^ 01 Q1 Q�
J �n � 7 N N N N N -- N N N �--� �--� N N M M N N �--�
�
d
� p G� W w U U U U m d w m ¢ ¢ U d Q cn m w ¢ ¢ ¢ m w ¢ ¢ Q d
p� a �
d a
� �
� ei'Q M 1� N N oo O� v� v� O� O �O N 1� oo O� .--� 1� l� .-. oo N l� t� -- O� �D O� �
U O� Vl �--� �A �D 00 N 00 V� 00 .-. Vl N 00 l� .--� M M [� �O Q� � l� M 00 M � <+1
� � ; 00 01 l� l� 1� l� \O V �O �O V1 M 1� N 7 �D �O 01 ^� N ^' �O �O V� M M M O
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o � �
� a E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N e M O l� N oo �O N [� O� v'� ... l� 7 O� � � O� O� V O O O ... O^ 00 .-. v� ,-. v
� O V ^ 00 00 O� l� Vi N �/i M O �O �O V� M M �O o0 M ^� Q� Q� Q� r�
L � �n � 7 N N N N N -- N N N -- -- � �--� N N M � M `r' M N N �--� — �
a °'
0
= E
O `o
V � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U
� _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >
` q M O � � �/1 Vl �!1 �A ^� V1 V1 V'1 M O O �/1 � Vl � �A O V'1 M V� � M C''1 t'�1 O
�r „ �o �o � � � � � � oo r r c� � � � � � � � � cv r" �o r � �o �o �o 0
.,- N U � � M M M M M M N C''1 M M � N N M M M M M M N M M � Vl V1 0
_
� �
U �
v ; � O Ca C] f.� G] C� Ca Ca Ca Ca O C� � � C� C� Ca C] Ca � Ca O � O Ca Ca Ca �
41 a �o v� v a v v v v m v v 7 �c � v v v v v v �v � �c � v �o � � a
�O Q
` O
�- � ._,
N o �
� � o
a w
Q' o 'o 0 0
1� o � 'D �
r c'�d CC '� c .g s° G
O U ❑ c`a � o F ;, a
N � �o ,� o o � _ � T E �
L � � � � � � � _ � � > U � o 0
O O
G� � � CC lY. � ? .Q � � U � CO R Q O p, ��p V]
C/� .� � L Y aJ � � � p �, �a
� y �c � .i �a `d' � ¢ > a, � � o � `e .� o a O
'D o- ° °' � ° E O a
_ � � c�d a^,�i � c0.a � � c�a p ,,�°�. � c�a c c�a c�a m 3 ,.°i., � c�d °'
'= v� s o o °' °' � :; � � Y � � .a a=i �° ri �° x° � � Z � U � —' U �
d � N � � � � v� � � o" o o � Q y � � � v� �- o � o > > . x u
a � °° U ❑ o � � � 'o " � � � �a � ° °, ❑ °' ,d -, c �o A
� E .�? o ai r� 3 0 'v o ❑ � a o ❑ ❑ o � •, o � > U o o v
v�i � � � � � � a�i a�i � � ,D o Cx � � F- ro CG m ca = j ,D o Q > N ��j�o
I 4� .p �a a� c�d > > � � 2 � x ..'^. Q o = ` U U c�d �` a� � � � G �� y
� v� � ,.a x U Q Q � o � o o U a � � .b, V
No 0 o a�i o 0 0 �a _ ° �o a� � a�i n�, � c � o a �a �a � � � ° E �;� � �O ai
� � � ;,�, � 0 7 o ca o ;a a �o ^ ^ a� 3 c m
� � s � ° .> � a°�i ia ca � � � o � '- a ai > � — � c�d ` � Y o ca t a` �'o.� �
r. Y � 6� : `..� aG � c° > � � > � � Q c 7 v� v� � c`a W U U x a U.a � m
� v� G v� � Ca � v� w w � a^ Q � -, w U w o � w w �.., v� � A- C o �,.. o � >,�.� c
�, � ❑ o 0 o v o 4. 0 4, o = o 0 0 0 � o ro o �a o Q M
� 5 ,� � ;? o ai ,� c � �c o y ° s � ¢ � � °' � � Y �,� � N �
y � c c E 3 C � � � a`°i 3 � N � � � � � 3 � � 3 = � �, „ ,n`n � i� o
� � cL �a a� a� a� o o °' � o ro o ai �a o 0 0 °' °' � o - �, O �, <o N
� F- v� x v� U .a x c ti U O � z v � a� c va E- � x U O z v� � o� �w .o_. Q
� o � �
� b � N Q 7 � E �
I
�° y �o � o �� � � �
� `� °� D U U o �— W
w � � j, � 0.7 °� a�i c�a � `° � � °' c Z �U
'O N -K. ` a� a�i � Y � > O n m.`� jj v v X m N
eC > U y � c`a W Q fx U o �.o �� U � O
aQ �y v� °� vz o ❑ � � c�a a°�i ° �w y�v � �a
. _. � ro �, = � c��o °c ❑ � � a° y�a° «^p Q �O�
3 � 3 � „� _ �, Q @ m
ro = � � a� y c� a� s � �;q a', � H ��
�G > 3 r� Z v� U O 2 U ., ° -a �.a ;, � 0 m
� T �
--� N M 7 v'i �O l� 00 O� O --� N M V v'� �O l� oo O� O -- N M 7 vi �O t� 00 ]v Q id CC R: j ��
N N N N N N N N N U Q,.�U y(' �O U�
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
Congestion Management Agency
�
Threshold TRA-B: Would the proposed project conflict with an applicable congestion management
program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand
measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?
[CEQA Transportation/Traffic Threshold 16(b)]
As discussed above, under Threshold TRA-A, the implementation of the proposed project would not
result in significant impacts to the study area intersections that could not be mitigated to a less than
significant level. Intersections in the City and under Caltrans jurisdiction were analyzed in accordance
with the standards and criteria established by each jurisdiction. Within the project study area, the study
area two intersections analyzed are identified as Congestion Management Program(CMP)Intersections:
• SR-55 Southbound Ramps at Katella Avenue,and
• SR-55 Northbound Ramps at Katella Avenue.
The proposed project would not result in traffic that would exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a
level of service established by the CMP for intersections or roadways. Therefore, no impact would occur
and no mitigation measures would be required.
Level of Significance
The proposed project with the project design features would have a less than significant impact
congestion management and no mitigation measures would be required. �
Air Traffic
Threshold TRA-C: Would the proposed project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial
safety risks?
[CEQA Transportation/Traffic Threshold 16(c)]
The proposed project will not include any facilities, structures, or programs that would effect air traffic
patterns. This PDF provides that the proposed project will include review by City Staff to assure that all
City Standards are met related to circulation system design. Air traffic patterns would not change as a
result of implementing the proposed project, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks. Therefore, based on the information presented above no
impacts to air traffic patterns would result from implementation of the proposed project and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Level of Significance
The proposed project with the project design features would have a less than significant impact to air
traffic and no mitigation measures would be required.
Page 5.16-64 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
Hazards
Threshold TRA-D: Would the proposed project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e. g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
[CEQA Transportation/Traffic Threshold 16(d)]
Site Access
PDF TRA-1 through TRA-8, TRA-11, TRA-12, and TRA-16 implement the proposed project design
features to reduce or eliminate potential traffic hazard impacts. The PDF's provide that the proposed
project will dedicate and improve right-of-way to Santiago Canyon Road. The proposed project will not
provide vehicle access to Cannon Street or to Mabury Avenue. The proposed project will dedicate right-
of-way to Cannon Street. The proposed project will direct all access to signalized intersections with
Santiago Canyon Road. The proposed project will provide two signalized primary vehicle access points
to Santiago Canyon road from the project site. The proposed project will provide two emergency vehicle
access points to Santiago Canyon road from Planning Area C and D. The proposed project established
private streets to meet City Standards. Additionally,the multi-purpose recreational trails will be available
upon completion of construction of the residential units within Planning Areas C and D. The proposed
project will include on-site regional and multi-purpose trails and neighborhood trails. These trails will
provide connectivity between the project site and the adjacent community and within the project site
neighborhoods. The proposed project would potentially increase traffic hazards related to project site
vehicular access.
The proposed project would provide two access points directly on to East Santiago Canyon Road. The
addition of the two project signalized intersections along East Santiago Canyon Road allows for generally
even intersection spacing, between 1,100 feet and 1,390 feet, which would allow for efficient traffic
progression along East Santiago Canyon Road given that the intersections are interconnected with the
existing traffic signals on East Santiago Canyon Road at Cannon Street and Orange Park Boulevard.
The intersection of the Recreational Driveway/ East Santiago Canyon Road would operate at LOS D in
both peak hours in the Opening Year 2017 plus Project condition. Vehicular queuing would be 100 feet
(four vehicles) on the southbound (driveway) approach, and 100 feet(four vehicles) on the eastbound left
turn lane approach. In the General Plan 2030 plus Project condition, this intersection would operate at
LOS B and LOS A in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. Vehicular queuing would be 75 feet
(three vehicles)on the southbound (driveway) approach, and 75 feet(three vehicles) on the eastbound left
turn lane approach.
The intersection of the Residential Driveway/ East Santiago Canyon Road also would operate at LOS D
in both peak hours in the Opening Year 2017 plus Project condition. Vehicular queuing would be 75 feet
(three vehicles)on the southbound(driveway) approach, and 100 feet(four vehicles)on the eastbound left
turn lane approach. In the General Plan 2030 plus Project condition, this intersection would operate at
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.16-65
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.16 Transportation and Treffic
LOS B in both peak hours. Vehicular queuing would be 75 feet (three vehicles) on the southbound
(driveway) approach, and 75 feet(three vehicles)on the eastbound left turn lane approach.
In addition, with the generally equal spacing of 1,000 feet— 1,390 feet between the existing and proposed
signalized intersections on Santiago Canyon Road, at Cannon Street (existing), the Recreational Uses
driveway (proposed), the Residential Uses driveway (proposed), and Orange Park Boulevard (existing),
bicycle traffic along the east- and westbound directions of Santiago Canyon Road would be adequately
served as the intersections would be interconnected to provide for the progression of vehicles, including
bicycles, through the signalized intersections. Furthermore, with the new signals at the two project access
points, vehicular and bicycle conflicts would be minimized as the traffic signals would assign right-of-
way at the intersections, as opposed to stop-controlled approaches at the access points, where older
drivers from the senior residential Planning Area, and vehicles with children from the recreational
Planning Area, would need more decision time and gap acceptance time to travel through the
intersection(s).
Therefore, based on the information presented above and the PDF's a less than significant impact would
be anticipated and no mitigation would be required.
Sight Distance
PDF TRA-1 through TRA-8, TRA-11, TRA-12, and TRA-15 implement the proposed project design
features to reduce or eliminate potential traffic hazards related to sight distance impacts. The proposed
project would establish two new signalized access points to East Santiago Canyon Road, between Cannon
Street and Orange Park Boulevard. East Santiago Canyon Road currently has a horizontal curve and a
painted (non-raised) median at the location of the two. A Stopping Sight Distance analysis was
conducted using the methodology from American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials [(AASHTO) (E�ibit 3-1 —Stopping Sight Distance, Elements of Design, page 112)]. Based on
the sight distance analysis, there is adequate sight distance at both new intersections for vehicles entering
and exiting both access points. Refer to Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis for detailed information.
At a minimum, within both lines of sight, landscaping should be minimized (i.e., low-lying shrubs) and
on-street parking should be prohibited, to maintain adequate sight distance. With the provision of the
minimum AASHTO sight distances at the two new signalized intersections, bicyclists and pedestrians on
Santiago Canyon Road (especially ones travelling in the westbound directions) would be seen by drivers
attempting to turn in to, and out of, the project site at both signalized access locations. These drivers
would have adequate decision time to determine their maneuvers through the intersection(s). Therefore,
based on the information presented above and the PDF's a less than significant impact would be
anticipated and no mitigation would be required.
Street Dimensions (Cross-Sections)
PDF TRA-1 through TRA-8, TRA-11, and TRA-12, implement the proposed project design features to
reduce or eliminate potential traffic hazard impacts. The proposed project would potentially increase °
traffic hazards related to inadequate street dimensions (cross-sections). The PDF's provide that the
proposed project will dedicate and improve right-of-way to Santiago Canyon Road. The proposed project
Page 5.16-66 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
will not provide vehicle access to Cannon Street or to Mabury Avenue. The proposed project will
dedicate right-of-way to Cannon Street. The proposed project will direct all access to signalized
intersections with Santiago Canyon Road. The proposed project will provide two signalized primary
vehicle access points to Santiago Canyon road from the project site. The proposed project will provide
two emergency vehicle access points to Santiago Canyon road from Planning Area C and D. The
proposed project established private streets to meet City Standards. Additionally, the multi-purpose
recreational trails will be available upon completion of construction of the residential units within
Planning Areas C and D. The proposed project will include on-site regional and multi-purpose trails and
neighborhood trails. These trails will provide connectivity between the project site and the adjacent
community and within the project site neighborhoods.
The proposed project complies with all City Engineering Standard Plans and Specifications for roadways
and street cross-sections. Deviations from City standard plans occur only in Planning Area D. These
deviations are referenced on Figure 3-4, Tentative Tract Map and described and depicted within the Rio
Santiago Specific Plan. In Planning Area D, Streets "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", and "I" will deviate
from Standard City Plan 108, "Standard Private Streets".. These deviations include modifications to the
right-of-way width, the width of sidewalk, meandering of sidewalks, landscaping, width of parkway,
parkway materials, and curb-to-curb roadway width. Fuscoe Engineering and Vista Environmental have
assessed the curb-to-curb width as well as other deviations. Fuscoe and Vista concur that these deviations
do not have a measurable impact on street capacity nor on roadway safety and that the proposed modified
roadway cross sections are adequate to support all traffic loading from the single family residential use
" and intensity that is expected to be generated in planning area D.
With compliance with the City's Standard Engineering Plans and Specifications and the Rio Santiago
Specific Plan for internal roadways, pedestrians and bicyclists would be served as they travel within the
components of the proposed project. Therefore, based on the information presented above and the PDF's
a less than significant impact would be anticipated and no mitigation would be required.
Level of Significance
The proposed project with the project design features would have a less than significant impact to hazards
for transportation and traffic and no mitigation measures would be required.
Emergency Access
Threshold TRA-E: Would the proposed project result in inadequate emergency access?
[CEQA Transportation/Traffic Threshold 16(e)]
PDF TRA-1 through TRA-8, TRA-11, and TRA-12, implement the proposed project design features to
reduce or eliminate potential traffic hazard impacts. The PDF's provide that the proposed project will
dedicate and improve right-of-way to Santiago Canyon Road. The proposed project will dedicate right-of-
way to Cannon Street. The proposed project will direct all access to signalized intersections with
Santiago Canyon Road. The proposed project will provide two signalized primary vehicle access points
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.16-67
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
to Santiago Canyon road from the project site. The proposed project will provide two emergency vehicle
access points to Santiago Canyon road from Planning Area C and D. The proposed project established `��'`
private streets to meet City Standards. Additionally, the multi-purpose recreational trails will be available
upon completion of construction of the residential units within Planning Areas C and D. The proposed
project will include on-site regional and multi-purpose trails and neighborhood trails. These trails will
provide connectivity between the project site and the adjacent community and within the project site
neighborhoods. East Santiago Canyon Road would provide emergency vehicular access to the project site
from two primary access points and one limited access point. Emergency access would be provided
to/from Planning Area "A". Access will continue to be available to/from Mabury Avenue and the County
of Orange maintains a dirt road off the project site that presently provides access to/from the project site.
Additionally, no uses are proposed in Planning Area"A"that would require substantial emergency access.
Emergency access to/from Planning Area "B" would be available only from the signalized intersection
with East Santiago Canyon Road. Emergency access to/from Planning Area "C" and "D" would be
provided to/from East Santiago Canyon Road and multi-purpose trail along Santiago Creek.
Implementation of the proposed project would not have the potential to result in significant impacts
related to emergency vehicular access. Therefare, based on the information presented above, the Fire
Master Plan, the project design review process going on concurrent with the review of this Draft EIR, and
the PDF's a less than significant impact would be anticipated and no mitigation would be required.
Level of Significance -
The proposed project with the project design features would have a less than significant impact to
emergency access and no mitigation measures would be required.
Alternative Transportation
Threshold TRA-F: Would the proposed project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the
performance or safety of such facilities?
[CEQA Transportation/Traffic Threshold 16(�]
PDF TRA-10, TRA-ll, TRA-12, TRA-16, and TRA-15, PDF LUP-1, PDF REG1, and REC-7
referenced above implement the proposed project design features to reduce or eliminate potential impacts
to alternative transportation.
The proposed project will establish an internal pedestrian system that will include both on-street
sidewalks and off-street paths. On-site vehicular connectivity will be provided between Planning Areas C
and D to allow easier access to the signalized intersection / primary access point. The proposed project
will provide for Santiago Creek to be maintained for a multi-purpose trail system. The proposed project
will provide public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities that meet or exceed all City Standards. The
proposed project will include a signalized trail crossing at the main entrance to the project site on East
Santiago Canyon Road. The signalized trail crossing will provided connectivity for to/from recreational
trails and the Mara Bradman Arena.
Page 5.16-68 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
The proposed project will include recreational and open space opportunities within Planning Area A.
This will include multi-purpose recreational trails, Santiago Creek, and open space. The multi-purpose
���� recreational trails will be available upon completion of construction of the residential units within
Planning Areas C and D. The proposed project will include on-site regional and multi-purpose trails and
neighborhood trails. These trails will provide connectivity between the project site and the adjacent
community and within the project site neighborhoods. The recreational trails will be available upon
completion of construction of the residential units within Planning Areas C and D. The proposed project
will include approximately 1.3 miles of on-site regional and multi-purpose trails. These trails will
provide connectivity between the project site and the adjacent community. The proposed on-site regional
trails will have the potential to be accessed from existing and proposed off-site public trails. The proposed
perimeter regional trail along Santiago Creek will implement a portion of the proposed City and County
Master Plan of Trails.
Transit Service
The proposed project would increase demand for public transit facilities. While there are no transit
services available in the immediate project vicinity, the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA)
operates two bus routes with stops approximately two miles to the west and to the southeast of the project
site. OCTA Bus Route 54 is a route approximately two miles southeast of the project site. This route is
known as the Garden Grove to Orange route via Chapman Avenue. OCTA Bus Route 167 is a route
approximately two miles west of the project site.
The City's General Plan Circulation Element is the adopted policy related to alternate forms of
transportation. The City's General Plan requires the proposed project to include the potential for
municipal fixed-route bus turnouts. However, as noted above, Santiago Canyon Road is not a designated
bus route by the OCTA. Implementation of the proposed project would not prelude the future installation
of a bus turnout, if Santiago Canyon Road would be so designated by the OCTA in the future with a bus
turnout proposed in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the project does not
have the potential to conflict with adopted alternate forms of transportation related to transit service and
no impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Facilities
Pedestrian Facilities
There are no existing pedestrian facilities on the project site. There are continuous sidewalks along East
Santiago Canyon Road on the south side of the roadway where there are existing residential
developments, from Cannon Street to the proposed project's residential access intersection. West of the
project site, there is a continuous sidewalk on the south side of East Santiago Canyon Road along the
property of the Salem Lutheran Church to the intersection at Orange Park Boulevard. There are no
sidewalks on the north side of Santiago Canyon Road, along the proposed project's southern boundary.
There are curb and gutter along the north side of the roadway with a dirt walking path.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.16-69
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
The proposed project would provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the project site along Santiago Canyon
Road. Additionally, the proposed project would provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the interior private
streets on the project site. Pedestrian trails are proposed to augment sidewalks on the project site. A
multi-purpose trail system is proposed throughout the project site. Please refer to Section 5.15,
Recreation for detailed discussion of pedestrian paths provided. Therefore, with the implementation of
the PDF's noted above, no impact on pedestrian facilities would occur and no mitigation measure would
be required.
Bicycle Facilities
There are no existing bicycle facilities on the project site. The City's General Plan Circulation Element
identifies Santiago Canyon Road as a Class II Bikeway. Class II Bikeways are on-road routes delineated
by painted stripes. The proposed project would not eliminate this bikeway. The proposed project
includes on-site trails that would link to off-site trails providing an alternative from of transportation. In
addition, the recreational component will provide bicycle racks supporting this alternative form of
transportation. The proposed project would facilitate the use of alternate transportation methods.
Therefore,with the implementation of the PDF's noted above, no impact on bicycle facilities would occur
and no mitigation measure would be required.
Equestrian Facilities
There are no existing equestrian facilities on the project site. The Mara Bradman Arena is located across
East Santiago Canyon Road from the project site. There is an equestrian trails on the south side of East
Santiago Canyon Road from the Mara Bradman Arena across the street from the project site, that travel
east to an existing north-south equestrian trail on Orange Park Boulevard.
Existing and proposed equestrian facilities on and in the vicinity of the project site are described in detail
in Section 5.14, Recreation. The proposed project would facilitate the use of equestrian transportation.
Therefore, with the implementation of the PDF's noted above, no impact on equestrian facilities would
occur and no mitigation measure would be required.
Level of Significance
The proposed project with the project design features would have a less than significant impact to
alternative transportation and no mitigation measures would be required.
Page 5.16-70 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.16 Transportation and Traffic
5.16.6 Evaluation Summary
Table 5.16-27, Evaluation Summary Table — Transportation and Traffic, summarizes potentially
,.�.,: .
significant project impacts from this Draft EIR.
Table 5.16-27: Evaluation Summary Table—Transportation and Traffic
Threshold Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Level of Significance
Impact TRA-1 MM TRA-1
Impact TRA-2 MM TRA-2
Traffic Increase Impact TRA-3 MM TRA-3 Significant
Impact TRA-4 MM TRA-4 Unavoidable
Impact TRA-5 MM TRA-5
MM TRA-6
Congestion Management Agency Less than significant None required Less than significant
Air Traffic Less than significant None required Less than significant
Hazards Less than significant None required Less than significant
Emergency Access Less than significant None required Less than significant
Alternative Transportation Less than significant None required Less than significant
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.16-71
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
5.17.1 Introduction
Purpose
The purpose of this section is to describe the existing and proposed utilities and service systems and
potential effects from the proposed project implementation on these services. This section also identifies
mitigation measures to reduce any potentially significant impacts and describes the residual impact, if
any, after imposition of the mitigation.
Sources
The following sources were used in consideration and discussion of the potential environmental impacts:
• Electronic Correspondence with James L. Burror, Jr. P.E., Engineering Supervisor Orange
County Sanitation District(OCSD), as provided in Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment,to this
Draft EIR.
• Electronic Correspondence with Ramona Takahashi, Project Engineer, City of Orange Water
Division, as provided in Technical Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment,to this Draft EIR.
� Guidelines for Developments in the Area of Facilities, Fee Properties, and/or Easements of the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California(MWD).
• Rio Santiago Water Quality Technical Report, City of Orange, by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., May
l, 2013, as provided in Technical Appendix K, Water Quality Technical Report, to this Draft
EIR.
• Waste Not, Want Not: The Potential for Urban Water Conservation in California, by Pacific
Institute,November 2003 (http://www.pacinst.org/reports/urban_usage/appendices.htm).
• Water Supply Assessment for Rio Santiago Project, City of Orange, by Ergun Bakall Consulting
Civil Engineer, December 2009, as provided in Technical Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment,
to this Draft EIR.
• 2005 Urban Water Management Plan, Municipal Water District of Orange County, December 21,
2005.
• 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Orange, May 2011.
• Comments received during the public review period and at the scoping meetings. These
comments are contained in Appendix A,Public Participation Process.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-1
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
5.17.2 Existing Environmental Setting
Water Service
The proposed project site lies within the boundary of the City of Orange Water Department(City) service
area. Figure 5.17-1, Conceptual Master Water Plan, illustrates that two existing water mains are present
on the southerly side of East Santiago Canyon Road. The water mains are owned and operated by the
City Water Department(OWD)and measure 18 inches and 24 inches in diameter respectively.
In addition, a Metropolitan Water District (MWD) pipeline traverses the site within a 50 foot wide
easement. The pipeline is known as the Allen-McCulloch Pipeline (Diemer Intertie). It measures 109
inches in diameter and is a vital link in the MWD transmission system that supplies most of Orange
County with potable water.
Existing Water Supply
Regiona/Wate�Supp/y
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) is a wholesale water agency responsible
for providing supplemental water(water from sources other than local groundwater and surface water)to
agencies within its service area. MWD supplies imported water to Southern California from Northern
California and the Colorado River. As a wholesale agency, MWD finances, constructs, and operates the
pipelines and other facilities that transport water from its sources to the wholesaler's area of service. The
water purveyors, such as the OWD, transport the water from MWD's storage facilities or distribution
pipelines and provide water service to their retail customers. �
Loca/Wate�Supp/y
The majority of the domestic water used in Orange County is from the groundwater basin managed by the
Orange County Water District(OCWD). In 1994, the OCWD prepared a Groundwater Management Plan
that defined goals to increase basin water supplies, protect and enhance water quality, and improve basin
management for purposes of increasing reliance on local water sources rather than imported supplies. In
response to these goals, the OCWD in partnership with the County Sanitation District of Orange County
(OCSD) constructed the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Plant. The Water Reclamation
Plant, which opened in January 2008, is located at the OCWD's headquarters in the City of Fountain
Valley. The Water Reclamation Plant cleans effluent to State standards and injects it into the
groundwater basin. The effluent is pumped from OCSD's adjacent Reclamation Plant No. 1 (sewage
treatment plant) to the Water Reclamation Plant where it is cleaned to be free of bacteria, viruses,
carcinogens, hormones, chemicals, toxic heavy metals, fertilizers, pesticides, and dissolved
pharmaceuticals. The treated water is then injected into the groundwater basin where it combats the
intrusion of saltwater. The current capacity of the Water Reclamation Plant is 70 millions gallons per day
with the potential for expansion to treat up to 130 million gallons per day.
Page 5.17-2 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
� . 4� � �;� , � � .—r
�' I i '
_ .. ' � �4, �l �. . '�t �� �� r�
, `„��'��_ """� � '�` �' �� � � �, �I'�
_ , i ' � •�,^"� i A � , � {,t...- � ���aa
� � � '' �,� �,r � �� _ �� � � ����� �
� , 'f' ,.,''-� 1 j Ll'., � ' � `L���� �
� . •t. - t
�� �E '�.� , i � ._�� � � , , �� Q' w
�-�•�i�\� j' �.j �,i� � - ? � � � , '�� �-�„."° [� �¢ �
,�, , �� ;,,,� ,-, � , �.,
��; �1 i , ��;� ; -�� t ��� I ; �; � �. � �� � �
�, � � �i � � -'�� �, � _��. - '� � � °z
, � � , �� � . = — � s��� � �p� �
I(�T`�Y� .�� �' �l�,l� /f �1 i �������„��
( 4i ��
i � '�.W: ��� � �� � y � � ��Z _ �O{ � C ��������3��
��� j: ( ��.. - � ' f�� I
�� � J � �i'��. � � � z
� � � -�� � � � Ili
� • � i � C, s � � � � � �; �� e� � I �
, � � ;Fa"' � /� � � � �� (
� j �� _ � -- ,� ��rj �'1 �
� � � �z r�\ '> i ?� r\ � ! -� �! , � '�
� � ��� ti ��
�I� i ~ \:�i; i � t � \}�/ "�r j ;i��� { Q
1� � � � ; 'r - a..�, x, � < .
1 � � �/�``Y� � � i �� �,���¢�
��'��� � a ��� J�� � � ��� �� � ���� i �_,��� .
. � � </ �, l � �� _ �. � . �* ;k � . Z
- ��
.
� � � � � ��� �
i� p i; , - -� - ' ;! �� �
� :�i ;; �+ ____, _ 6 --�.t � �� W
� �i �I ;i' ��.��� _ _�`� � �d --�- �� - � �I � ��_! {r� • � �,� � �
!�ti��� � �����.�'� � _ � � _ �. � � � � � �
} � 4'y �;r� '\'� . ,- �� �r i� � � � �/
. ,
. , ,
_,����� i ', '� ��, � �„ �;, ��� .� '' � _
11. � :. '}-,• T �. � =�. rT1
,a:n+'s< I � i ' � 1 i i L� l' �� � - Fii O
, ` t4
I � > . _ s �t _ c
, , _
� � , ---$ - _ . .l. _ �t _ �
\\� ` - � i �', i ' � � �
••�� • �� " � ( � ` __ y� 0
� \\ U Z / � t'.., � -� �.�, �R�L.L'LiLLs-L.. '.h_ ���s rCKR�N� �
� •
,� � Z� � ' '�. _�_.. — " �
` % i �� � t��� �-�—��..�•��
[i� �� �.�;,�� �o ., "� /� n� �is= � �� �-� � �� � � � ; �
,� ♦� � 1 j �` '� +, $� �f� ( �l� �� ' ,�� � �
,
, i .
�
�
_ _ _---��-� ;r��;-, t �x-;',� `. , -- ------��---� � , ;� � �� ', w '
l;
S!1!NAfYI-.�_ . / ' 1 �,� �
---�-- - J ,�� ��
� :� , \ _..' " .. .. . .._. w��
t -� � �� U
� � ' " �` g ���, �m""' ' � �
� � '���� � � � �1�� �, ---____ _- ' �
)� � �� � � -- — .` � O
� � � � ,
�, � ,.�. � � �� .� �____ � ` � ��� . � �-+
,�, " ' - ' ` "
� � �� � �!'� _� �'�, ��, �
i���1� 8 � �' � �_._ � ,'`` `� ��) �
�%'� `�,,` �\ ��` t— `�� �i �� . : � C�
;
'� • � / � ` =' ', �, 6 �., '�
�s `�i \'',1` r� �\ Y �; , i �,s"-- � -- �� ` ; .. l��ir; � �
� ��'`h � � .� \'i o �� �\ '�. � � � ,.y'"� � � ��+� � f-�
'� % ; / \ '. \�`,, .�+� R,. � �� ��l
'`' � � �` ��� ? \� a�` ' . ArT—lI �
,� � ,� ., .
rs' /r �� j �`^ ��. ��""; � � ` \'`, �'+uO� �I W �
.\
� \, �,\ _�-�-�' .\ '� � �
/ �. ,���� ��. ��a, , `� ,,��.,'� � �--�
: ., , � � `. ' .� . 7
�'' `� `° � � � ` `t /`---1
i y�.: �_ �r' � a>
7�y � jj � `
� � � � \, .�_�� '. q�� �`�A�'� �
� '� � \ � �, ��.�. _ l�a+ � . \,.\\`�\ w�N�O ..-1 O
1fi 'yL�c�F ,,l.� . ,�� \ 'J1 t�� \�\\ ,{�y T `
�' ' `Y
� �..'. �-�I �� � �\`� `�� _. .y:.:s�'d� T�� W
_ �� v
r'�� -� � �' .st ,��J 4\�\`,� O
u� , �'� � �, � \ r�/�
`;' u��,..�.u.. `� � �
.� � � ��•� � � , •��\ �� w
. . `� . �Y ' t ,�,� , t' . � �
��r - - iArc�•___._ ` _ � � � \��,�1 �i
--- - _. _ �- ._-,. .
.��. �
- - --.- . _ __._..�_._ __ ... -`-��••"'-- - ._ �.�.� '•\-' O
,a•x�, .,� .�-� �
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
City of Orange
The City Water Division (OWD) is responsible for providing clean, safe water to the residents and
businesses in the City. The City obtains 75 percent of its water supply from City-owned wells. The
remaining 25 percent of its water supply is imported. This imported water is purchased from the MWD,
the Serrano Water District, and the East Orange County Water District. In fiscal year 2005-2006,the City
used approximately 31 million gallons per day.
Wastewater Service
The OCSD wastewater system includes two treatment facilities: Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the
City of Fountain Valley; and, Reclamation Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach.
Wastewater from OCSD's service area is delivered to their treatment facilities via a 581 mile system of
sewer trunk lines and 16 off-site pump stations. The OCSD operates under a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board. Each treatment plant is served by an extensive network of sanitary sewer trunk lines, pump
stations and force mains. Including both treatment plants, OCSD treats approximately 222,000,000
gallons per day from multiple service areas throughout Orange County, serving a population of
approximately 2,400,000 people.
Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 198 million gallons per day (mgd) and a
secondary treatment capacity of 110 mgd. The average flow of wastewater received at Reclamation Plant
No. 1 is 85 mgd. Therefare, this treatment facility has an average existing remaining capacity of 113
mgd.
Reclamation Plant No. 2 has a primary treatment capacity of 168 mgd and a secondary treatment capacity
of 90 mgd. The average flow of wastewater received at Treatment Plant No. 2 is 148 mgd. Therefore,
this treatment facility has an average existing remaining capacity of 20 mgd.
Solid Waste Disposal Service
Solid waste collection in the City is coordinated by the City Public Works Department and provided by
Waste Management of Orange County, a commercial solid waste hauler under license from the City. The
City is under contract to the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department (Orange County
IWMD)to commit all of its waste to the Orange County Landfill System.
So/id Waste Disposa/Sites
The County of Orange (County) owns and operates three active landfills: the Olinda Alpha Landfill; the
Frank R. Bowerman Landfill; and, the Prima Deshecha Landfill. Table 5.17-1, Orange County Landfills,
summarizes information regarding these landfills. The Olinda Alpha Landfill, located in the City of Brea,
accepts municipal solid waste from commercial haulers and the general public. The landfill is permitted
to receive up to 8,000 tons of waste per day. This landfill is approximately 565 acres with 420 acres
permitted for refuse disposal. The Olinda Alpha Landfill opened in 1960 and is scheduled to close in
December of 2021.
Page 5.17-4 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
The Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, located in the City of Irvine, is permitted to receive a daily maximum
of 8,500 tons of waste per day. The landfill is approximately 725 acres with 341 acres permitted for ,
refuse disposal. The Frank R. Bowerman Landfill is scheduled to close in the Year 2053.
The Prima Deshecha Landfill, located in the City of San Juan Capistrano, accepts municipal solid waste
from commercial haulers and the general public. The landfill is permitted to receive up to 4,000 tons of
waste per day. This landfill is approximately 1,530 acres with 1,000 acres permitted for refuse disposal.
The Prima Deshecha Landfill is scheduled to close in the Year 2040.
Table 5.17-1: Orange County Landfills
Permitted Acres
Scheduled Date Maximum Permitted
Landfill Name Location for Closure Daily Tonnage for Refuse
Olinda Alpha Brea 2021 8,000 420
Frank R.Bowerman Irvine 2053 8,500 341
Prima Descheca San Juan Capistrano 2040 4,000 1,000
Source:Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department(www.oclandfills.com)
So/id Waste P�og�ams
The Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department (Orange County IWMD) conducts a
variety of solid waste programs. These programs include household hazardous waste program and ..._
recycling programs to reduce the volume of waste disposed at the Orange County landfills.
The State mandates that, through source reduction, recycling, and composting, solid waste was to be
reduced 25 percent reduction by the Year 1995 and 50 percent by the Year 2000. These mandates are
addressed by the City through their license agreement with the waste hauler.
5.17.3— Regulatory Setting
State Requirements
Senate Bi//6�0
State legislation addressing water supply includes Senate Bill (SB) 610 (Costa) and SB 221 (Kuel), both
of which became effective January 1, 2002. SB 610, codified in the California Water Code, Section
10910 et seq., described requirements for both water supply assessments and Urban Water Management
Plans (UWMP) applicable to the CEQA process. SB 610 requires that for specified projects subject to
CEQA, the urban water supplier must prepare a water supply assessment to determine whether the
anticipated water demand associated with a proposed project is included as part of the most recently
adopted UMWP. Specially, a water supply assessment shall identify existing water supply entitlements,
water rights, or water service contracts held by the public water system, and prior years' water deliveries
received by the public water system. In addition, it must address water supplies over a 20-year period and
consider average, dry, and multiple dry years. In accordance with SB 610 and Section 10912 of the
City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013 Page 5.17-5
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
California Water Code, such projects subject to CEQA requiring submittal of a water supply assessment
include the following:
• A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units.
• A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or
having more than 500,000 square feet of floor space.
• A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than
250,000 square feet of floor space.
� A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms.
• A proposed industrial manufacturing, or processing plant or industrial park planned to house
more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000
square feet of floor area.
• A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in paragraphs 1 through 5
above/or paragraph 7 below
� A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of
water required by a 500 dwelling unit project.
In addition, under SB 610, an urban water supplier responsible for the preparation and periodic updating
of the UWMP must describe the water supply projects and programs that may be undertaken to meet the
total project water use of the service area. If groundwater is identified as a source of water available to
the supplier, the following additional information must be included in the UWMP: (1) groundwater
management plan; (2) a description of the groundwater basin(s)to be used and the water use adjudication
rights, if any; (3) a description and analysis of groundwater use in the past five years; and, (4) a
discussion of the sufficiency of the groundwater that is projected to be pumped by the supplier.
Senate Bi//22�
SB 610 and SB 221 are companion measures which seek to promote more collaborative planning between
local water suppliers and cities and counties. SB 221 applies to the Subdivision Map Act, conditioning a
tentative map on the applicant verifying that the public water supplier has "sufficient water supply"
available to serve it. The Bill applies to any subdivision defied as:
• A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units.
• Any proposed development that increases connections by 10% or more, if the PWS has fewer
than 5,000 connections.
Page 5.17-6 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
• Does not apply to any residential project proposed for a site that is within an urbanized area and
has been previously developed for urban uses. � .
• Does not apply to housing projects that are exclusively for very low and low-income households.
SB 221 requires that the public water supplier provide written verification of sufficient water supplies.
This bill defines sufficiency in a different manner than SB 610, by requiring consideration of the
following factors:
• The availability of water over the past 20 years.
• The applicability of any urban water shortage contingency analysis prepared per Section 10632 of
the State Water Code.
• The reduction in water supply allocated to a specific use by an adopted ordinance.
• The amount of water that can be reasonably relied upon from other water supply projects, such as
conjunctive use, reclaimed water,water conservation and water transfer.
The written verification must also provide evidentiary proof of the water supply, and the standard for that
proof is largely similar to SB 610. In most cases,the water supply assessment prepared under SB 610 will
meet that requirement.
Ca/ifornia Deparfinent of Wate�Resources
The California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) manages the water resources of California in
cooperation with other agencies, to benefit the State's people, and to protect, restore, and enhance the
natural and human environments. Its responsibilities include: educating the public on the importance of
water and its proper use; collecting, analyzing, and distributing water-related information to the general
public and to the scientific, technical, educational, and water management communities; serving local
water needs by providing technical assistance; cooperating with local agencies on water resources
investigations; supporting watershed and river restoration programs; encouraging water conservation;
exploring conjunctive use of ground and surface water; facilitating voluntary water transfers; and, when
needed, operating a State drought water bank. The Office of Water Use Efficiency within the CDWR
administers financial assistance in the form of loans and grants for implementation of cost-effective,
efficient agricultural and urban water management, ar for programs that are not locally cost-effective but
provide a Statewide benefit.
Ca/ifornia Code of Regu/ations, Tit/e 24, Pa�t 6
California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6, Energy Efficiency Standards, promotes efficient energy
use in new buildings constructed in California. The standards regulate energy consumed for heating,
cooling, ventilation, water heating, and lighting. Title 24 is the State Uniform Building Code (UBC); its
standards are enforced through the local building permit process.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-7
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
County Requirements
County-Wide/ntegrated Waste Management P/an(C/WMPJ
The California lntegrated Waste Management Board requires that all counties have an approved County-
Wide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP). To receive approval, the CIWMP needs to
demonstrate that there will be sufficient solid waste disposal capacity for at least 15 years ar identify
additional available locations outside of the County where there is available capacity. The Orange
County CIWMP, dated 1996, describes future solid waste disposal demand based on the County
population projections adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors. The database for the Orange
County CIWMP indicates that the landfill system in the County has capacity in excess of 30 years which
is well within the 15-year threshold defined by the California lntegrated Waste Management Board.
Local Requirements
Assemb/y Bi//939
Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939) mandates that, through source reduction, recycling, and composting, solid
waste was to be reduced 25 percent by the year 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000. The waste haulers
for the City are expected to contribute to AB 939 recycling goals by recycling residential and commercial
waste collected in their service areas. In addition, project applicants and developers are expected to
employ solid waste reduction measures to reduce the amount of solid waste generated during construction
activities.
City of Orange Municipa/Code
Chapter 7.01, Water Quality and Stormwater Dicharges, provides the City's requirements related to
improvements of water quality, to comply with the federal requirements for the control of urban
pollutants to stormwater runoff, which enters the network of storm drains throughout Orange County, and
to regulate discharges of stormwater to the storm drain system within the City.
Chapter 8.28, Garbage, provides the City's requirements related to solid waste storage, disposal,
recycling, sanitation requirements, charges, and violations.
Chapter 13, Public Services, Section I, Water S'ystem and Section II, Sewer System, detail the process of
getting approval to set-up water and sewer service in the City.
Metropo/itan Water District(MWDJ
According to the Guidelines for Developments in the Area of Facilities, Fee Properties, and/or Easements
of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Metropolitan Water District (MWD) requires
that when environmental documents have been prepared, they receive a finished copy to comment.
Furthermore, the Lead Agency is to advise MWD that project has complied with the requirements of
CEQA prior to MWD's participation. The project application, must agree to indemnify MWD, its
officers, engineers, and agents for any costs or liability arising out of any violations of any law or
regulations including by not limited to CEQA and its implementing regulations.
Page 5.17-8 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
5.17.4 Significance Thresholds
The following thresholds of significance have been established for the evaluation of the proposed -
project's potential utilities and service systems impacts consistent with AppendiX G of the State CEQA
Guidelines:
Threshold USS-A Would the proposed project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Threshold USS-B Would the proposed project require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction
of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Threshold USS-C Would the proposed project require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
Threshold USS-D Would the proposed project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
Threshold USS-E Would the proposed project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to -
serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Threshold USS-F Would the proposed project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
Threshold USS-G Would the proposed project comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
5.17.5 Evaluation of Potential Project Impacts
This section will evaluate whether the proposed project would potentially have a substantial adverse
effect on utilities and service systems. This evaluation assumes that the project will be implemented
consistent with the Project Description, including all Project Design Features(PDF's).
Project Design Features
All Project Design Features (PDF's) associated with Utilities and Service Systems are noted below in
Table 5.17-2, Project Design Features & Utilities and Service Systems Impact Comparison. The table
identifies the PDF's related to each CEQA threshold. The checkmark indicates that the PDF reduces,
eliminates, and/or avoids impacts associated with the related threshold. Refer to the threshold analysis for
specific details.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-9
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
�U
a�+ N O
o �a
3 � rn
.� i .`°
- � c
� W v�
� �
m��°-
O
� �'
'� v m
� � �
ip Q- O
� J U `o
y `d U
�L. � L
Q � � � b
E 3 �' � U
� � w
� V
O r � Q. G
U y c�°i ca �
V y � � U w
lC -
� O �'
� y L d c�
N L +' Q- x �e x �
� �
d H � �
Q �
�+ Q N �
fA W � .�
d
d o
t� � Cf Gyi
.� 3 �, ;�, „
w
d � � 'u �
N r � �i �
� � t
ta °:
m � m +' �
_ o ca�id °'
. �
` 3 � = �
� � r' � •� k k k �
�
oiS � � � �i .�
� 3
L b
� V �
�
� U
{Q i+ C
� � � o
C +�+ !yE
�
� � ` �
.� � F" E
� �
�.+ � N .S". � U ¢, V � O
.� �� CZ. 'b � y 'b b � �
a, 3 -:
a o ,� � � � -0 3 0 .� � h
� -� '" 3 � � o � �° ' e �
o � w 3 � � ❑ �
�Cf � ,� '� '+� y +-' � � ,� 'O � c
� � m
y � � � a`�'i � � `� �. � a
E � � a�i 'U o > � � �� ``" � .w
a: � C i� a� 'd � �.�, � >, a�i >,'C � �
4. �3a. �.
� N � �, ,� o �}' � 4�"., p � pQ., p
u � �. � � on 3 � � �; •� .b >, � V
'Z u a� a�i �' 3 ,�„ .� � �o�n.°��° � ��., � �n �,
v) p ['�-� �O 'O � a. s.�. 3 .T-� .� � � t � O
'O �• y � e-
� a � � �
0
ayi V� V1 (%� � � �o
:_ V] Vl Va ', Y ri N
�
n w w w X � �2
� L1 A A o' c°io U
�; w a. a. � �, a�
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Wastewater Treatment
Threshold USS-A Would the proposed project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the °��-
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
[CEQA Utilities and Service System Threshold 17(a)]
Short-Term Construction Impacts
During the short-term construction phase, wastewater service would be provided by on-site porta-potties
for use by construction workers. These would be removed at the completion of the construction phase.
Therefore, less than significant impacts would result related to wastewater treatment during the short-term
construction phase of the proposed project and no mitigation measures would be required.
Long-Term Operational Phase
The OCSD provides sewer service, including wastewater treatment, for the project site. The OCSD
wastewater system includes two wastewater treatment facilities: Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the
City of Fountain Valley; and, Reclamation Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach.
Wastewater from OCSD's service area is delivered to their treatment facilities via a 581 mile system of
sewer trunk lines and 16 off-site pump stations. The OCSD operates their facilities under a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board.
Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 198 million gallons per day (mgd) and a
secondary treatment capacity of 110 mgd. The average flow of wastewater received at Reclamation Plant
No. 1 is 85 mgd. Therefore,this treatment facility has an existing remaining capacity of 113 mgd.
Reclamation Plant No. 2 has a primary treatment capacity of 168 mgd and a secondary treatment capacity
of 90 mgd. The average flow of wastewater received at Treatment Plant No. 2 is 148 mgd. Therefore,
this treatment facility has an existing remaining capacity of 20 mgd.
The total average daily wastewater generations for the proposed project are depicted on Table 5.17-3,
Proposed Project Wastewater Production. The development of the proposed project would generate
107,098 gallons per day of wastewater. The development of the proposed project would not cause
OCSD's wastewater treatment facilities to exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, no impact would be anticipated and no mitigation
measures would be required.
The project proposed would provide for the development of the project site with residential, open space
natural, and open space active recreational uses. A multi-purpose facility would be developed in Planning
Area B. Wastewater generated by the proposed project would be typical of the above uses and would not
require any specialized treatment requirements. As a result, the potential of the proposed project to
exceed wastewater treatments requirements does not exist. Therefore, impacts of the proposed project
would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-11
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Table 5.17-3: Proposed Project Wastewater Production
OCSD Wastewater
Development yyastewater
Planning Planning Area Area Size Production
Name Generation Rate
Land Use Description �AC� Co-efficient
(GPD/AC) (GPD)
Open Space: OS(Natural Open Space,
A including Santiago Creek Greenway 50 n/a n/a
Reserve)
Open Space Park: OS(Active
�B Recreation such as ball fields and 10 129 1290
Multipurpose Faculties)
Medium Density ResidentiaL• MDR
C (265 unit Age-Qualified Community 16 3451 55216
including Individual Units,Independent
Living, and Assisted Living)
p Low Density Residential: LDR(130 34 1488 50592
Single-Family Residences)
Total 107,098
Source:Appendix A,Public Participation Process, Orange County Sanitation District Letter Dated April 15, 2011
Level of Significance
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to wastewater treatment requirements and
no mitigation measures would be required.
Water or Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Threshold USS-B Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
[CEQA Utilities and Service System Threshold 17(b)]
Short-Term Construction Phase
During the short-term construction phase,wastewater treatment for on-site construction workers would be
provided by porta-potties. No new water or wastewater treatment facilities are proposed or would be
required during the construction phase. Therefore, no impacts related to the provision of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities during the construction phase would result and no mitigation measures
would be required.
Long-Term Operational Phase
As indicated in Figure 5.17-2, Conceptual Wastewater and Sanitary Sewer Plan, wastewater generated on
the project site would be collected on-site and conveyed off-site via lateral service lines to a trunk sewer
line (18-inch to 24-inch) owned and operated by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). The
Page 5.17-12 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
entire project site would continue to receive sewer service from the OCSD. The project site was recently
annexed into the OCSD.
The total average daily wastewater generations far the proposed project are depicted on Table 5.17-3,
Proposed Project Wastewater Production. The development of the proposed project would generate
107,098 gallons per day of wastewater. According to communications with James L. Burror, Jr. P.E.,
Engineering Supervisor OCSD as provided in Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment truck sewer near the
project site can accommodate the planned uses of the proposed project. Furthermore, PDF USS-1
through PDF USS-3 aim to further reduce the projects impacts water usage through different types of
landscape. Therefore, the development of the proposed project would not result in a significant impact
related to the wastewater conveyance facilities that serve the project site an excess capacity in the
conveyance facilities. Because sufficient wastewater treatment capacity exists to process the amount of
wastewater generated by the proposed project, the proposed project does not have the potential to require
or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion or existing
facilities. A less than significant impact would be anticipated and no mitigation measures would be
required.
Water Distribution Facilities
The development of the proposed project includes an on-site looped water distribution system to provide
water service for domestic use, landscape irrigation, and fire-flow and off-site connections.
Figure 5.17-1, Conceptual Master Water Plan, illustrates that two existing water mains are present on the �
southerly side of East Santiago Canyon Road. The water mains are owned and operated by the City of
Orange Water Department (OWD) and measure 18 inches and 24 inches in diameter. Service laterals are
proposed for connection to either the 18 inch pipe or the 24 inch pipe respectively. The laterals would
cross East Santiago Canyon Road and penetrate into the project site to supply domestic water, landscape
water and fire service water. A Water Supply Assessment(WSA)and updated correspondence,Appendix
O, Water Supply Assessment was prepared for the project site.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-13
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
� �� � ,; � � � �
�, � ` ;--; ,�,, �' ,� �� z� �,
. , � �� �,��t��` �� � �.,, ���� �
,r.�', 1 '� I i� s � ��aA w
` ` - �`� � ,4 �����
_ C _ � � •� � ��• � � ,� � f�
— '�' r r �� 1 . ' w ��, i9�8� ��I�-�
\����..i �«� iiwi ` . � j � `i p��""`�� � ..W.1 `J
^t y I I � �++ � ..�� �'� � � �' , { � � �
�� ;� j 1�, ' � �;1,� � e��--�-� � � � �--, o
' ' �} :+ r� -� �'' ' _ ` ` ���� � �� ', z
� � IM � �_' �i �_ , t� _ ����� � �
� � i �.�,' ;�� + ---�' � _ i,�i .� , � ������
. , �
�_.
, ::
� i ��.K� !�' 1 . - �- . _ - ,� �� ��
..¢ r,
I '�h �'', ..�:e_ _ �� Z �3 8
1 � � h � � � �
� � i�) ���.� �� � � ��`f �� I �
;_, � ,,� �'�: �� _ _ � � �', -� ' �- �;; K-; � i I I I I I w
. ; �� � , nd;,�:` �T� - � �=�-- ` }' s:.
'` � `�,'�fi�{ I `� '`'�� ,;" � �' ;�.�+ � �
� � ��
! - \ , � r x w
l 1 � ���� �l � � � �'� V 1
i�l jj � ` -� 1 � - ��r� j �<��`�i`
� �' � � � �a� .-- - � �t: �� _� � �.. �1�
�� � ,� �� � -� .J j � ' S �' ,�/
; �! �� 1' � ��� � - _�; , 1 . �� ��'` W
�I;`��� � ,"� � �,�., --, __ I -� � ��' �1 i �� u� F� �� �, W
' � _x rti
i'' .,+-�', .- ..1 � �� < e• � \./
' } i� �\_��� _ - � '�'�� x. 17
.
� � ' y ti�a � 7 �'�('�'". y � � ��-•1
1 I � �
; f "l1 ...., ,i...� .�. ��`i.4 � 5' ' ' %
J�r�� , I � �rl-{. � - -TY�''."� --�':�;` ��� �
niars� � •� �� � � � �:i '.� � � �'.� �+f . ��/� �
�� �� � - ,� �� _ - : k.t' � - � -_ � V1 �1
?y � r— ' O
� \ ��\ �' g - � ` J,.11, - . :;i-yu�.' r�- �� ' - �v,,,,,.d„w�c
'ti; �\\ �o g���� .�/+ , � ;� �' - � 3t ; � Q
, � •.t\` 3 .Pr/' ��� �Sr� c �� �.�' .f 7 �
,
;
� , .
� :�, � � s l�, � a��R �. � � � � )�'9 E"�
. • -
i , � f' � ti , � "„a` ,r�T�� _ 11 z �.v.. -� �
, . ,,� , , �� 7 '' r �
l�,�� � t y\ �
_'____..��� � .? � _, _ ' �lf _ y��-_ ji� ,n �l� `./
a�r�w�iv+ - l . i�`�� �i — _ . ` �
--._..�.._� � rf� t' � f ;'�Cr,r N V - -�-_ �sy �' � �,Nnr .. --� � � �
' / L � W Q; U
1 � } � % �. - � � k � ��Sd
�� ,, i __ .y�` l' �� � M�--�1 ti
_ � � t � � � � �- �� ��.� �
� � '`�� � � � �� _�� � � ;�� � � O
� '? e ,./
/�-�'� ` ; � � b ,� � :, `.;� y ,.� � Fii
/;;/��,1 � x . ,� r '-S% �I
. ,
� � • — �7�
, .
/ y '
�i . A�,� �V . i� � �_ . � . � ��\
`� / -� � A\ �,/i- a:�� ' F"�'1 �
, .
�
� t,` �.;�`,` �,� � � ( j - -_._. �.` `s`-� -.... :.` . � � �?11i'��'l. � �4
j �£.� ' �� � __ t .��q '� ��� � F-1
� �.. � �.� ,,. � '} .�.� ��' . �._ , � �
� �r�� ,� � �
//� ,' ` `�� — �'f ' -- \��� � � �
�' � �� ` �1�1��k'�'i � � �°� �
�� �`\A 4.-`��� ..,���..�'#d" ' \ \ \
�{�+ `�%'\•� l`. \\, i'1;��• _ r�t a- \'` t'�� � Cr• � O
`� .` � � � _.__ ..,,..Z.� � '' �� ` �� •�"
� � �
/t� ,\ � �o �� � � �
� .� \ �?;. �� �� � � \ wv� �
"+r 1 3 ._ ...... .�.Wm
. �' �,y°.-% `+►� �`� � ����,. - ' , p'�tL ��.� \ �
��'s � � �� �'""`.\;• ,,-`' �.`°o o . ��,a'\ w ^ �
� . �� W F+�1
ao`
t� ` J� �``�,` M ° W
� �� ..��.i)`� u�+.M.rr.« ' '�� `1 U
� ,
. . ��a� � � � . � . , �
�� . Y � � �t ' w
� ,
}�. , ,. �
� �,
�, �,��
h��, . _ • ..
` \� w
,, ___ �. . :__. —_. ._4.---- � �,
�
,�- --
.
_ _ .,�,�._ �
,-<- `-— -- -- �--- ., r �
— _.._.._---- -- _.-. � ,;\ �
_.._ _ _ _ _. �s ._ _.. �-�-� �. �
~'` � � �� p `J
� �.�
- _.,� — : _ __ - v�
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
In addition to local groundwater, the City is dependent to a lesser extent on imported water from
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and Municipal Water District of Orange
County(MWDOC)to meet its demands. MWD and MWDOC have prepared and adopted 2005 Regional
Urban Water Management Plans for their respective service areas, which is inclusive of and consistent
with the City's base supply and demand projections. Pursuant to Water Code Section 10631 (k),the City
has relied upon water supply information provided by the wholesale agencies, MWD and MWDOC in
their respective Regional UWMPs as well as the City's Urban Water Management Plans for their
respective service areas, which is inclusive of and consistent with the City's base supply and demand
projections addressed herein. Pursuant to Water Code Section 10631(k), the City has relied upon water
supply information provided by the wholesale agencies, MWD and MWDOC in their respective Regional
UWMPs as well as the City's Urban Water Management Plan Update (2010 UWMP Update) prepared
and adopted in May 2011. Therefore, reference is made to the 2010 MWD Regional Urban Water
Management Plan(Regional UWMP) for the reliability of MWD water supplies and their vulnerability to
seasonal or climatic shortages. Furthermore, in July 1, 2009 the MWD proceeded with implementation of
Water Allocation Plan. MWDOC has also adopted and implemented Water Allocation Plan for its
members. Accordingly, the City may receive only 85 to 90 percent of its imported water needs. Since the
City typically receives only 30 to 38 percent of its water demands from the imported sources, this may
translate into approximately 5 percent reduction in total supply capacity. The City may provide additional
water supplies by either increased pumping from groundwater and or through conservation, and or
purchase of additional import supply at higher cost.
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)
The City adopted its most recent Urban Water Management Plan Update (UWMP) in accordance with
Section 10610 et seq. of the California Water Code in May 2011which included water supply and demand
projections through year 2035. The information included in this Draft EIR addresses supply and demand
projections for the entire City service area through the year 2035, inclusive of the project. Consequently, a
projection period of 20 years is used for purposes of this WSA as required under Section 10910(c) (3) of
the California Water Code. Although projected water demands associated with "a project" at this site
were included as part of the City's 2010 UWMP Update, the purpose and the characteristics of the
proposed development at the site have changed.
The City's 2005 UWMP Update included water demand of 145,000 gallons per day or 159 acre-feet per
year for the project site. Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment, determined that the previous project
(referenced in Section 1.0, Introduction, Previous NOP) would have a water demand of approximately
284 acre-feet per year That was a net increase of 125 acre-feet per year over the project site demand
described in the 2005 UWMP Update. However, according to Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment,
"...it was decided to use 284 acres per year in order to maintain consistency with the demand figures
utilized in the City's Water Supply Assessments prepared since the adoption of the 2005 UWMP Update.
This is a more conservative approach and would also account for any unaccounted for increase in
demand" (page 11). The Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment concluded that even with the increase in
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-15
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
water demand over the 2005 UWMP, the City possessed sufficient water supplies for the previous project
described in the Previous NOP.
Table 5.17-4, Proposed Project Water Demand indicates total water demand for the proposed project in
acre feet per year far all proposed uses on the project site, including irrigation and landscape demands.
The proposed project would require 195 acre-feet per year of water. As mentioned above the previous
project, upon which the City performed, the Water Supply Assessment was determined to have a demand
for 284 acre-feet per year. Based on this information the proposed project would require 89 acre-feet per
year less than the previous project.
Table 5.17-4: Proposed Project Water Demand
Plannin Areas' Indoor Outdoor Combined
Plannin Area B
Cit Park 0 7,446,758
Health Club 4,790,595 2,936,171
Total(gal/year) 4,790,595 10,382,929 15,173,524
Total(acre feet) 14.70 31.86 46.57
Plannin Area C
Apartment Low Rise 10,424,644 6,572,058
Congregate Care(Assisted Living) 3,909,242 2464522
Sin le-famil housin 3,946,830 2,488,219
Total(gal/year) 18,280,716 I 1,524,799 29,805,51 S
Total(acre feet) 56.10 35.37 91.47
Plannin Area D
Single-familyhousing 11,401,954 7,188,189
Total(gal/yeaY) 11,401,954 7,188,189 18,590,143
Total(acre eet) 34.99 22.06 57.05
Total( al/ ear) 34,473,265 29,095,917 63,569,182
Total acre feet 105.79 89.29 195.09
' Land Use Categories selected to represent the proposed land use on project site. The source document did not always
have exact land use categories(i.e.City Park vs.Private Park with ball fields)
Source:http'//www pacinst orH/reports/urban usage/appendices htm
Norma/, Sing/e Dry, and Mu/tip/e Dry Water Yea�s(20-Yea�ProjectionJ
Table 5.17-5, Water Supplies - Acre-Feet per Year, shows the water supplies available to the City as
documented in the City's UQMP Update 2005. Basin supplies were adjusted to account for current well
production capacities as to the date of the WSA.
Page 5.17-16 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Table 5.17-5: Water Supplies—Acre-Feet per Year
Single Multiple Dry Water Years
Normal
Source of Water Dry Water
Water Year
Year Year 1' Year 2' Year 3'
Orange County Groundwater Basin 38,3502 38,350Z 30,6803 30,680 30,680
Local Water 1,000 0 0 0 0
Imported MWD Water 35,983 35,983 35,983 35,983 35,983
Total 75,333 75,333 66,663 66,663 66,663
%Normal 100% 100% 88.5% 88.5% 88.5%
� First,Second and Third year of Multiple Dry Years.
Z Adjusted from 2005 UWMP to reflect present day well production capacities.
' 80 ercent of d - ear er the 2005 UWMP.
Source:Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment
Table 5.17-6, Water Demands Acre-Feet per Year, shows the water demands of the City with and
without the water demands estimated for the project. Table 5.17-7, Water Supply vs. Water Demands,
shows the comparison water demands and water supplies for the City as documented in the City's
Maguire Orange Center Project WSA and the water demands determined for the Project.
Table 5.17-6: Water Demands—Acre-Feet per Year
Single Multiple Dry Water Years
Normal
Source of Water Dry Water
Water Year
Year Year 1� Year 2� Year 3'
Total Water Demand before Project' 37,031 39,095 39,802 39,802 39,802
Percentage of Normal Year Demands 100 105.6 107.5 107.5 107.5
Total Water Demand ofthe Project 284 300 305 305 305
Total City Water Demand with the 37,415 39,395 40,107 40,107 40,107
Project
' Total water demands ofthe City as documented in the City's revised WSA for Maguire Orange Center Project,dated
A ri12009.
Source:Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment
As indicated previously, the WSA concluded that current and future sources of potable water supplies are
sufficient to meet the projected water demand associated with the previous project water demand of 284
acre-feet per year, in addition to the City's existing and approved (other) new development uses. The
WSA analysis demonstrated that the combination of Orange County Groundwater Basin Supplies and
MWD base supply would have enabled the City to meet the projected 20-year water demand associated
with the previous project. Because the proposed project requires 109 acre-feet less per year than the
previous project, it can be concluded that the City has sufficient water supply for the proposed project.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-17
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Therefore, a less than significant impact would be anticipated and no mitigation measures would be
required.
Table 5.17-7: Water Supply vs.Water Demands—Acre-Feet per Year
Single Multiple Dry Water Years
Source of Water Normal Dry Water
Water Year
Year Year 1� Year 2� Year 3'
Total City Water Demand with the 37,415 39,395 40,107 40,107 40,107
Project
Total Water Supply Capability of the 75;333 75,333 66,663 66,663 66,663
City
Reserve Capacity 37,918 35,938 26,556 26,556 26,556
Demand as Percentage of Supply 49.7 52.3 60.1 60.1 60.1
� First,Second and Third yeaz of Multi le Dry Years.
Source:Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment
Level of Significance
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to water or wastewater Treatment
Facilities and no mitigation measures would be required.
Stormwater Drainage Facilities
Threshold USS-C Would the proposed project require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
[CEQA Utilities and Service System Threshold 17(c)]
Short-Term Construction Phase
No drainage facilities would need to be constructed during the short-term construction phase of the
project. Please refer to Section 5.8, Hydrolo�y and Water Quality, of this Draft EIR for a discussion on
storm water run-off during short-term construction phase of the proposed project. Appendix K, Water
Quality Technical Report, concluded that in accordance with the existing and updated General
Construction Permit (GCP), a construction Storm Water Population Plan (SWPP) must be prepared and
implemented at the project site, and revised as necessary, as administrative or physical conditions change.
The SWPP shall describe construction BMPs that address pollutant source reduction, and provide
measures/controls. These include, but are not limited to: erosion controls, sediment controls, tracking
controls, non-storm water management, materials and waste management, and good housekeeping
practices. Prior to commencement of construction activities, the project-SWPPP will be prepared in
accordance with the site specific sediment risk analyses based on the final rough grading plans and
erosion and sediment controls proposed for each phase of construction for the proposed project. The
phases of construction will define the maximum amount of soil disturbed, the appropriate sized sediment
basins and other control measures to accommodate all active soil disturbance areas and the appropriate
monitoring and sampling plans. Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Qualiry, concludes that the proposed
Page 5.17-18 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
project would have a less than significant impact during short-term construction phase on storm water
run-off and no mitigation measures would be required.
Long-Term Operational Phase
Please refer to Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Draft EIR for a discussion on storm
water run-off during the long-term operational phase of the proposed project. As discussed in detail in
5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed project includes PDF HWQ-10, which incorporates site
design, source control, LID (i.e., bioretention, infiltration facilities)and treatment control BMPs. For each
Planning Area, LID features have been incorporated into the proposed land uses to provide water quality
treatment and flow attenuation. Implementation of these features will mitigate the anticipated changes in
pollutant sources and provide protection to local receiving waters. Therefore, with PDF HWQ-10 that
requires the development and implementation of LID, site design, source control, and other BMPs
through a project-specific WQMP, a less than significant impact would occur during long-term
operational phase on storm water run-off and no mitigation measures would be required.
Level of Significance
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to storm drain facilities and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Water Supplies
Threshold USS-D Would the proposed project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
[CEQA Utilities and Service System Threshold 17(d)]
Short-Term Construction Phase
Water supply during the short-term construction phase would be available from the existing water supply
lines that currently service the project site. These supply lines currently service the Backfilling Operation
from a storage water tank located on-site. The short-term construction phase would require no change
from that presently being used. Therefore, impacts related to water supply during this phase would be
less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required.
Long-Term Operational Phase
PDF USS-1 through PDF USS-3 aim to further reduce the impacts to the project's water usage through
different types of landscape. Water Supply would be supplied to the project site by the City Water
Division. Additionally, the City Water Division prepared Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment for the
proposed project. The WSA concluded that total projected water supplies available from the City's public
water system including the groundwater from the basin or basins from which the proposed project will be
supplied during normal, single dry, and multiple dry water years during a 20-year projection are sufficient
to meet the projected water demands associated with the proposed project, in addition to the City's public
water system's existing and planned future uses, including agricultural and manufacturing uses(exclusive
of the Project). Current and future sources of potable water supplies are sufficient to meet the projected
City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013 Page 5.17-19
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
water demand associated with the proposed project, in addition to City's existing and approved new
development uses (exclusive of the project). The analyses included in the WSA demonstrate that the
combination of Orange County Groundwater Basin Supplies and MWD base supply would enable the
City to meet the projected 20-year water demand associated with the Project. Therefore, impacts related
to water supply during long-term operational phase would be less than significant and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Fire F/ow Water Supp/y
The proposed project would increase demand for water supply to provide for adequate fire-flows
requirements. Water supply during the long-term operation of the proposed project would be available
from the existing water supply lines that currently service the project site. Figure 5.17-1, Conceptual
Master Water Plan, illustrates that two existing water mains are present on the southerly side of East
Santiago Canyon Road. These water mains are owned and operated by the City Water Department
(OWD) and they measure 18 inches and 24 inches in diameter respectively. Therefore, with the existing
OWD facilities serving the project site,the proposed project would have a less than significant impact and
no mitigation measures would be required.
Level of Significance
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to water supplies and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Threshold USS-E Would the proposed project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
[CEQA Utilities and Service System Threshold 17(e)]
The OCSD provides sewer service, including wastewater treatment, for the project site. The OCSD
wastewater system includes two wastewater treatment facilities: Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the
City of Fountain Valley; and, Reclamation Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach.
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Reclamation Plant No. 2 have existing capacities of 113 mgd and 20 mgd,
respectively. Reclamation Plant No. 1 has an existing remaining capacity of 113 mgd. Reclamation Plant
No. 2 has an existing remaining capacity of 20 mgd. The development of the proposed project would
generate 107,098 gallons per day of wastewater. According to communications with James L. Burror, Jr.
P.E., Engineering Supervisor OCSD as provided in Appendix O, Water Supply Assessment truck sewer
near the project site can accommodate the planned uses of the proposed project. Therefore, based on the
existing remaining capacity of the wastewater treatment system, the proposed project would have a less
than significant impact and no mitigation measures would be required.
Page 5.17-20 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Level of Significance
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to wastewater treatment capacity and no
mitigation measures would be required.
Landfill Capacity
Threshold USS-F Would the proposed project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the projecYs solid waste disposal needs?
[CEQA Utilities and Service System Threshold 17(fl]
Short-Term Construction Impacts
The development of the proposed project would result in the generation of construction waste materials
during the short-term site preparation construction phase. The short-term increase would be a potentially
significant incremental impact of the proposed project. City regulatory requirement requires the
preparation of a construction waste management plan. The construction waste management plan must
demonstrate that construction waste would be reduced by 50 percent and is consistent with the California
Intergrated Waste Management Act. The construction waste management plan must be reviewed and
approved by the Public Works Director or designee with a copy to the Community Development Director
or designee.
Long-Term Operational Impacts
The development of the proposed project would result in an incremental increase in the generation of
solid waste necessary for disposal. The long-term increase would be a potentially significant incremental
impact of the proposed project. As indicated previously, the three landfills in Orange County have
adequate existing and future reserve capacities to serve the proposed project. The proposed project would
generate approximately 1,036.7 tons of solid waste per year as indicated in Table 5.17-8, Proposed
Project Solid Waste Production.
As indicated previously, the three landfills in Orange County have adequate existing and future reserve
capacities to serve the proposed project. The 1,036.7 tons-per-year that would be generated by the
proposed project is less than the permitted aggregate landfill capacity of 20,500 tons-per-day and would
represent an incremental de minimis increase. Therefore, based on the existing remaining capacity of the
landfills, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact and no mitigation measures
would be required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 5.17-21
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Table 5.17-8: Proposed Project Solid Waste Production'
Development Solid Waste Solid Waste
Planning Planning Area Area Size Generation Rate Production Rate
Name Land Use Description (AC/Units) (tons-per- ear) (tons-per- ear)
A Open Space: OS(Natural Open 50 acres n/a n/a
Space, including Santiago Creek
Greenway Reserve)
B Open Space Park: OS(Active 10 acres
Recreation such as ball fields and 81,000 sq.ft 0.569z 461.2
Multipurpose Faculties) (per 100 sq.ft.)
C Medium Density Residential: MDR 16 acres
(265 unit Age-Qualified 265 age-qualified 1.17 310.5
Community including Individual units
Units,Independent Living, and
Assisted Living)
D Low Density Residential: LDR(130 34 acres
Single-Family Residences) 130 single-family 2.04 265.2
units
Total 1,036.7
` All generation rates utilized are from the California lntegrated Waste Management Board,Estimated Solid Waste Generation.
Z Based on a generation rate of 3.12 pounds per 100 square feet per day.
Source:California lntegrated Waste Management Board,http.//www.calrecvcle.ca.qov/wastechar/WasteGenRates/ September
2011
Level of Significance
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to landfill capacity and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Solid Waste
Threshold USS-G Would the project comply with Federal,State,and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
[CEQA Utilities and Service System Threshold 17(g)]
The proposed project would generate solid waste that would be stored in refuse containers until picked-up
by Waste Management of Orange County (a private refuse hauler licensed by the City) and transported
off-site for recycling and/or disposal. On-site solid waste storage and handling would be required to
comply with the mandatory obligations in the City's Municipal Code and applicable State and Federal
regulations citied in Section 517-3, Regulatory Setting. Therefore, project implementation would not
result in any impacts related to on-site solid waste storage and handling. A less than significant impact
would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
Level of Significance
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to solid waste and no mitigation measures
would be required.
Page 5.17-22 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
5.17.6 Evaluation Summary
Table 5.17-9, Evaluation Summary Table — Utilities and Service Systems, summarizes potentially
significant project impacts from this Draft EIR.
Table 5.17-9: Evaluation Summary Table—Utilities and Service Systems
Threshold Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Level of Significance
Wastewater Treatment Less than significant None required Less than significant
Water or Wastewater Treatment Less than significant None required Less than significant
Stormwater Drainage Facilties Less than significant None required Less than significant
Water Supplies Less than significant None required Less than significant
Wastewater Treatment Capacity Less than significant None required Less than significant
Landill Capacity Less than significant None required Less than significant
Solid Waste Less than significant None required Less than significant
City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013 Page 5.17-23
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
�r���'���.�; �.:����./�° . �������
6.1 Introduction and Summary of Cumulative Impacts
6.1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this section is to analyze potential cumulative impacts and describe the potential changes
in environmental conditions that result from the incremental impact of the proposed project added to the
impacts from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Pursuant to the
State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15130, an EIR shall discuss the
cumulative impacts of a project "when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable."
Section 15065(a)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines describes"cumulatively considerable"as follows:
"Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are
significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects."
Section 15130 further states that an adequate discussion of cumulative impacts necessarily includes either
of the following elements:
(A) A list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative
impacts, including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the agency, or
(B) A summary of projections contained in an adopted general plan or related plarrning
document, or in a prior environmental document which has been adopted or certified,
which described or evaluated regional or areawide conditions contributing to the
cumulative impact. Any such planning document shall be referenced and made available
to the public at a location specified by the lead agency.
6.1.2 Cumulative Analysis Basis
The State CEQA Guidelines provides for the use of a list and/or projections approach to cumulative
analysis. This report utilizes a hybrid approach, i.e., general plan projections augmented by a list of
probable future projects. The analysis in this section evaluates the cumulative impact of the proposed
project using a list of related projects. Table 6-1, Cumulative Impact Comparison, summarizes cumulative
impacts of the proposed project when combined with related projects. Specific sections of this EIR are
based on the City's traffic model (i.e., Section 5.3, Air Quality, Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions,
5.12 Noise, and 5.16, Transportation and Traffic) which is a subarea model based on the County-wide
OCTAM traffic model. Additionally, several sections are based in part on City General Plan
assumptions (i.e., Section 5.10, Land Use and Planning, 5.13, Population and Housing, 5.14, Public
Services, 5.15, Recreation, and 5.17, Utility and Service Systems.) Within each section the sources of
evaluation are noted.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-1
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-1: Cumulative Impact Comparison
' Pro�os�d Pro�e�has
Proposed Gumul�tirre Impacts '
Enrrironmental lssue Contnbut���#o
Project Impacts with�elat�Pra�ects
Cumulat��l�np��t
Aesthetics SIG-PM Yes SIGCC-PM&RPM
Agricultural and Forestry Resources LTS No LTS
Air Quality SIG-PM Yes SIGCC-PM
Biological Resources LTS-PM Yes LTCC-PM
Cultural Resources LTS-PM Yes LTCC-PM
Geology and Soils LTS-PM Yes LTCGPM
Greenhouse Gas Emissions LTS Yes LTCC
Hazards LTS-PM Yes LTCC-PM
Hydrology and Water Quality SIG-PM Yes LTCC-PM
Land Use Planning LTS Yes LTCC
Mineral Resources LTS Yes LTCC
Noise LTS-PM Yes LTCC-PM
Population and Housing LTS Yes LTCC
Public Services LTS Yes LTCC
Recreation LTS Yes LTCC
Transportation and Circulation SIG-PM Yes SIGCC-PM&RPM
Utilities LTS Yes LTCC
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant witb project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=1ess tban cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=signiftcant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(VisTA)
Page 6-2 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
6.1.3 Sources
The following sources were used in consideration and discussion of the potential cumulative
environmental impacts:
1. Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR, February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon College EIR, May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR, May 2013.
6.2 Related Projects
Related projects considered in the cumulative analysis include projects that, when combined with the
proposed project, have the potential to result in cumulative impacts. The list of related projects is
provided in Table 6-2, Related Projects, which provides summary details on related projects that will be
used in the cumulative analysis (this list also was provided in Section 4.0,Environmental Setting). All of
the related projects are located in the City, or nearby unincorporated territory within the County of
Orange (County) and are identified on Figure 6-1, Related Projects. The City has included a the list of
related projects after a review of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects that
are were determined to potentially produce related or cumulative effects.
6.3 Evaluation of Cumulative Impacts
The cumulative impact analysis in this section addresses each of the 17 topical environmental factors
referenced in the State CEQA Guidelines. The analysis for each environmental topic has been
accomplished in the following manner:
1. The analysis summarizes the proposed project and related projects and identifies impacts at the
project-level of detail;
2. The analysis then discusses impacts that would result when the effects of the individual projects
are viewed collectively;
3. The analysis addresses whether the proposed project's incremental contribution to a potentially
significant impact is cumulatively considerable. If not, the analysis ends. If it is, the analysis
continues to Items 4 and 5 below;
4. The analysis then determines the proposed project's relative contribution to the significant
cumulative effect; and,
5. The analysis then determines whether mitigation measures applicable to the proposed project or
related projects can reduce the cumulative impacts, or whether new mitigation measures
consistent with the CEQA Guidelines can be feasibly implemented to reduce or eliminate the
significant cumulative effect.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-3
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
� _..._. . _
a.
�C T,r�I .�,... �., a�� 9 � � - . I�l� .. . .. .......... r1
(� ,�I � '• . " €
C ��. �`"�,' `d .:_;tA k ,�5��� � i If II� �/��
d.� y � a ��� -.�;y+ �'}F: I� 7� �I./
r �' 6' 1'-1
t� �� �� �r��i-�� ;y. ` ._ '�, �';� p �
�iI II I� 1
a �.�u� I y � ��'"y.�+.� � ��.�"�= j
�JI�� ��1 �IIII -�j11.,� F" �
� �.� �Iplll r �9 �� � ��� /M'�
l
�
n,
.r
,. �
Za; , , _ .��n , M—�
W � � w r�
�
- F"�
�¢
W �'� "� � V� vvi
J
c p"� O
,� � � . � z
N
y
tC
�t.
�
�, *�N
�d ,rw.� , ��^'
N ~G�.-
N
O
���.... +�3
�.� �� C
_ � - � �$� .� �
�l C W
� � �
� � z
.
_ _ . . �
y L � . . -
� c� _ — _
w. �
� � m-- _ - `°� �
m ,��� �
� �
m �' a'�'�� ,. �
� � ,� � � .: O
��` �� _ �-� r ��`�# � ',"�
r"z � ,',�Y ri� `�'_ � i �i i"'�
. �
. , . .
� �
,, � _ . .
,". �_: , � „ �, � �'
_, - � — � � ' �� �
. *
` ,,�`' '� � � � �� .�*- � T a,,,`r � ""Y.J' y �; '" �
�.
: _ , �
� , �:
_ �• �,� —�4 . � �.''' y r ;: � -'�' y, g'�
�^�.� . , ��' �
' , . , � , ., � . . .' � �
.F � � � � . �� '�r�'�, • . �(� � �
x
H s� : �.
� � � ,��_ �" _; -� `�` W
� � �� ���� +�•._� , „� ��� � �—.
jL J 3['�,c`-' �f r ,�, O
i - ���. :. � �� �. �" " ��S �AR°�v� �
'„4 ,�, .t ..y e3'. �y .' M '.:��. y �
. � �k� � y; � R�4� s� * �,jt�'� � . �-I
r.��� �� 1 (�. 1��� � � -f-M'�� , ��.�` ..A.� � � k_V'� �
k:�.i y ...y. t�..� Y O
& �r
�' r,�
� �I�
a
i , w : � y ,, � � � � � a ,,, � 1 1 �/
` * ' ' F"'�
` '4!'... � � * '� «. . �_«x „f -. � �
' ��, � �,, �.� N �+._� ,��� .�* �_+t, w F--I
� F �i�� '.��° �"� � - ���. .�:,{ i'� e'n- . '�..�„°'`y5��-�` $`��o�,�t'� � IL-+
� � '�'� i ��¢ �0 � ��'�/��`� � ,:-.�+ .. a � �n.,, <�� ,� � +�� *ti"" �
. '� •v, oa,Y µ �
� g �M�� �{• �, �
��S�" s � �[ ��.i.-� �,_ ���� .
Y } " � �� +�j �� *�"�i '.0 O
e �� ��,. �f �,��� ���=�.i�r. F�-I
, ���g+,,
��` ,!, '9+�='y � `4'r�x'y°�'`�5� — ��;, � e. ' �
•
n•'�� �' � ���� ��� r �i I�'�
�
t �. � „ ' •��� �
�:
�,,. _ : �r' . �.,* %",g� � . aG`",q .
, , _
���
,. �1�.{ 1�" r,�°^ -K.d" yt 4 �� °'yF� i� a , �'..�.`��
.d" :
.a
t����yS. �, t € 4 "� � � .. L
�'"{'. i�� '�}�.*�Y' 't 'y�. ,.,t .. i` � " y+ �{� " �
�� ����� N, ���,r . .. . .. � �' `� � �_- .r. £�.,� L }# T �M� �.�r�'y
�� .�ry . � ��.-��. :. ., ,� - ��
F (�� .. § . . .. � � =,` '` �t .`�`���» x" ' ���-:7
�++� �,:' ,.�,.Y: ��
�� ,
,
.
�., . ' e g . , � . �. � .
�, . ;�;.< � '� . ` = {—� �y R ' ;�a
£' � d�� f F a'Y' ���� .�$ .,. .: � � ,�/
i a ,
.+ � 1 " �
k: '� �r � :. �
�
�"t 1V1: 4}�.� ' �. .. �,y � + .:X� 4,� �y,.�I-4
t� �-F � ��.��,� � � ; �;� ��• �O
,� '�� _
� ,�i v�
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-2: Related Projects
Map project Land Use Statistical Data Status
ID
1 Ridgeline Residential The project would divide the Approved project and certified
Equestrian Equestrian approximate 50 acre site into Environmental Impact Report, No
Estates 39-lots for single-family 1788-07, June 2011. The approval
residential development. of the project has been challenged.
(City of Orange)
2 Salem Church I1,000 sq. ft. sanctuary Entitlement application being
Lutheran addition (757 seats) and 13,000 processed. CEQA documentation is
Church sq. ft. church office space available for public review. (City of
Expansion Orange)
3 Villa Park Self-Storage 40,000 sq. ft. storage facility Entitlement application being
Self-Storage Facility and 1,500 sq. ft. attached processed. CEQA documentation
administration office and public has started. (County of Orange)
restrooms.
4 Holy Private Cemetery Improvements include wall Approved project and Mitigated
Sepulcher crypts, family estates, Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,
Cemetery mausoleums administration August 2008. (City of Orange)
Expansion building, maintenance facility,
recreational trails, and entry
and side street fencing
enhancements totaling
approximately 100,000 sq. ft.
on 11.2 acres.
5 Santiago Public Community On-going expansion of the Approved project and certified
Canyon College Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, May
College expansion includes 200,000 sq. 2005.
ft. for new buildings,
renovation of existing
buildings, signalization of
Newport Boulevard entrance,
and construction of new
campus entrance on Santiago
Canyon.
Road, sports fields, and 2,237
parking spaces.
6 East Orange Residential,hotel, Consistent with current City Approved, however construction
GPA golf course,park General Plan assumptions has not yet started. Supplemental
includes 4,000 new residential EIR No. 1278BIR No. 1716,
units, school,hotel,golf course, November 2005. (City of Orange)
and parks.
Source: Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Draft EIR and Community Development Department, City of Orange.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-5
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
6.3.1 Aesthetics
Introduction
This section will analyze aesthetic impacts related to scenic vistas, scenic resources, visual character or
quality of site, and new sources of light or glare/nighttime views.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.1, Aesthetics, of this Draft EIR, the proposed project
would have a significant unavoidable impact on scenic vistas, visual character or quality of the site, and
light or glare/nighttime view. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact on scenic
resources.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Project
Based on the information provided in the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates EIR, there are no officially
designated scenic vistas on or adjacent to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates site. There are existing
sources of substantial light and glare that may affect nighttime or daytime views in the area of the
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates site.
The development of the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project would not have a substantial adverse effect
on an officially designated scenic vista, would not generally degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings, and would not create new sources of substantial light and glare
that may affect nighttime or daytime views in the area.
East Orange GPA Project
Based on the information provided in the East Orange (EO) General Plan Amendment EIR, the project
would have a less than significant impact without mitigation on scenic vistas, State scenic highways, and
scenic resources. The project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to visual
character. This impact was partially mitigated by the architectural standards and design guidelines. The
project would result in impacts related to the creation of light and glare that would be less than significant
with mitigation. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005
far specific mitigation measures.
Ho/y Sepulcher Cemetery Project
Based on the environmental document prepared for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery project, impacts
related to scenic resources and visual character were less than significant and did not require mitigation.
No impacts were associated with scenic vistas or light and glare.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The Salem Lutheran Church and School Specifrc Plan Draft EIR indicates that the project will not
substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surrounding. Additionally,
it will not create a new source of substantial light and glare which would adversely affect day of nighttime
Page 6-6 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
views in the area. These impacts are less than significant before mitigation; no mitigation measures are
required; and, less than significant after mitigation (Page2-5, Draft EIR Salem Lutheran Church and
School Specific Plan, City of Orange, Orange County, CA, SCH#201110104�.
Santiago Canyon College Project
Based on the information provided in the Santiago Canyon College EIR, less than significant impacts
related to aesthetics would result and only required mitigation measures for light and glare. Specifically,
lighting in parking areas and other perimeters would be shielded to prevent off-site "spillage". Project
Design Features (PDF's) addressed other site development characteristics including integration of new
and old facilities,textured paving materials, and complementary landscape features. Refer to the Santiago
Canyon College Final EIR,May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures.
Villa Park Self-Storage Project
Based on a review of a letter of intent on file with the County of Orange,the proposed architectural theme
is California Mission Style in a residential character with a Mission Style tile roof.
The Villa Park Self-Storage site is not adjacent to a State scenic highway or identified scenic vistas. The
structure would be partially shielded from view by being recessed into the site and landscaped
extensively. The proposed architectural theme is intended to complement existing area developments.
Therefore, based on the presently know information it is anticipated that the project would have a less
than significant impact on the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings.
It would not be anticipated that the proposed storage faciliry would have substantial light sources. Project
safety lighting would be designed to be directed away from residential properties. Therefore, based on
the presently know information it is anticipated that the project would have a less than significant impact
as it would not create a new source of substantial light and glare which would adversely affect day of
nighttime views in the area.
Analysis
Scenic Vista
The proposed project would result in significant impacts to scenic vistas. Analysis indicates that East
Orange General Plan Amendment and Santiago Canyon College projects would have less than significant
impacts on scenic vistas.
The conclusions stated above, standing alone, do not preclude the potential for a cumulative impact. For
the purpose of this analysis a cumulative impact could arise, only if one ar more of the related projects
affected the same viewshed as the proposed project. The proposed project is not part of the same
viewshed as any of the related projects. The Villa Park Self-Storage facility may be visible at the same
time as the proposed project from some locations; however, this cannot be determined at this time with
certainty and is not considered as affecting the same viewshed as the proposed project. Consequently,
there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to scenic views and
vistas when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there is no incremental
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-7
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
effect which could be cumulatively considerable and while proposed project mitigation would be
required,no cumulative mitigation measures are required.
Scenic Resources
Based on the information provided above, the East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher
Cemetery, Santiago Canyon College, and the proposed project would have no impact or less than
significant impacts on scenic resources such as on-site trees, rock outcrops, historic buildings, and scenic
roadways. When these resources occur, they are mitigated on a project-by-project basis. These projects
are sufficiently separated by distance that combined scenic resource effects would not occur.
Three related projects (Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Villa Park Self-Storage, and Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion) and the proposed project border or front on East Santiago Canyon Road. East Santiago
Canyon Road is not a designate scenic resource. Though these projects would alter views along East
Santiago Canyon Road, the existing views are highly disturbed (refer to Section 1.0,Aesthetic, related to
the existing scenic resources on the project site) or have extensive design standards and architectural
design features (Villa Park Self-Storage), or would be subject to future City design review (Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion). The incremental effects of proposed project and related project on scenic
resources are not significant. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation measures are required.
Visual Character or Quality of Site
The proposed project would result in a potential aesthetic impacts related to the visual character or quality
of the site. While all related projects would change the visual character of each respective site to some
degree, only East Orange General Plan Amendment would result in a change in visual character that
would create a significant and unavoidable impact. Because the proposed project is separated from East
Orange General Plan Amendment area by over four miles of intervening topography, the East Orange
General Plan Amendment and the proposed project are not simultaneously visible. The proposed project
does not make an incremental contribution to the change in visual character to which the East Orange, or
any other related project, contributes. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation measures are required.
Light and Glare
The addition of the proposed project, combined with the related projects, would result in additional
sources of light and glare at each site. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan
Amendment and Santiago Canyon College projects to reduce the impacts to less than significant and
Project Design Features (PDF's) have been provided for the proposed project to address potential light
and glare from proposed residential and active recreational uses. Refer to the East Orange General Plan
Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 far specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago
Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures.
When viewed in combination, these projects would introduce new sources of light and glare that could
adversely affect surrounding properties and contribute to "urban glow". This impact is cumulatively
Page 6-8 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
considerable and significant. The proposed project incorporates site light design that eliminates direct
glare and minimizes light trespass to adjacent properties and by related projects complying with the
Orange Municipal Code Title 17 Zoning relative to lighting regulations. The impact would be
cumulatively considerable and significant, even with the incorporation of site specific mitigation
measures at each project site. Therefore, there would be an incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation measures are reasonable and technically feasible
to reduce this cumulative impact to a less than significant level.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative aesthetic impacts is provided in Table 6-3, Cumulative Aesthetic Impacts
Summary. Based on the information presented above the proposed project and related projects would
have cumulative aesthetic impacts, even with the incorporation of site specific mitigation measures at
each project site. There are no known cumulative mitigation measures that would be reasonable and
technically feasible to reduce these cumulative aesthetic impacts to a less than significant level.
Therefore, there would be an incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
cumulative mitigation measures are reasonable and technically feasible to reduce this cumulative impact
to a less than significant level.
Table 6-3: Cumulative Aesthetic Impact Summary
Potentiallm acts
Scenic Scenic
Environmental Issue Vistas Resources Visual Light and/or Glare
Character
Aesthetics
Rid eline E uestrian Estates NI NI NI NI
East Oran e GPA LTS LTS SIG LTS-RPM
Hol Se ulcher Cemeter NI LTS LTS NI
Salem Lutheran Church NI NI NDM NDM
Ex ansion4
Santia o Canyon College LTS LTS LTS LTS-RPM
Villa Park Self-Storage NI NI NI NI
Rio Santiago(Proposed SIG-PM LTS SIG-PM SIG-PM
Pro�ect)6
Cumulative SIGCC-PM LTCC SIGCC-PM SIGCC-PM &RPM
Notes:
/. Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmen�u!Impact Report,Jone,201 l.
2. East Orange Genera]Plan Amendment Supplemetttal EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemelery 6xyansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No.1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutherun Church and Schoo/Specific Plan Drafi E/R,February 2012.
S. Son�iugo Cunyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rro Santiago Drafi EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than camulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less thau cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitiga[ion
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCGPM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable a�d unavoidable with project mitigation and rela[ed project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-9
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Source: Vista Community Pdanners(VIST.4).
6.3.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources
Introduction
This section will analyze impacts related to farmland; the Williamson Act; forest land, timberland or
timberland production; forest land; and, other changes to farmland or forest land.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.2,Agricultural and Forestry Resources, of this Draft EIR,
the proposed project would have no impact related to farmland; the Williamson Act; forest land,
timberland or timberland production; forest land; and, other changes to farmland or forest land.
Related Projects
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment is the only related project containing agricultural-related
zoning classifications: General Agricultural and Agricultural Public Facilities. The environmental
documentation prepared for the East Orange General Plan Amendment concluded that the East Orange
General Plan Amendment would have no impacts on agricultural resources.
Other Projects
The Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion,
Santiago Canyon College, and Villa Park Self-Storage project sites are not devoted to agricultural
production, do not propose agricultural uses, and do not maintain agricultural classifications under any
governmental agency. These site are not presently under a Williamson Act contract, and do not contain
forest land,timberland, or timberland production.
Analysis
Farmland
The proposed project, when combined with related projects, would not result in cumulatively
considerable agricultural impact. Analysis indicates that there are no impacts to farmland from the
project or related projects. Portions of the East Orange General Plan Amendment are classified as Grazing
Land, Urban and Built-Up Land, and Water. These categories do not meet the criteria for important
farmland and include areas such as low-density rural development, wetlands, dense brush and timberland,
gravel pits, and small water ponds. Therefore, the incremental effects of the proposed project related to
farmland are not significant when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects.
Williamson Act
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in cumulatively
considerable agricultural impacts related to the Williamson Act. Analysis indicates that there are no
impacts to farmland from the project or related projects. Portions of the overall East Orange General Plan
Amendment project area were under a Williamson Act contract, but they have since been removed (1986
Page 6-10 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6A Cumulative
and 1997). Therefore, no portions of the related project areas are presently subject to Williamson Act
contract restrictions. Therefore, the incremental effects of the proposed project related to the Williamson
Act are not significant when viewed in connection with related projects.
Forestland, Timberland, or Timberland Production
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in cumulatively
considerable agricultural impacts related to other changes to forestland, timberland, or timberland
production. Analysis indicates that there are no impacts to forestland, timberland, or timberland
production from the related project or related projects. Therefare, the incremental effects of the proposed
project related to other changes to forestland, timberland, or timberland production are not significant
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of related projects.
Forestland
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in cumulatively
considerable agricultural impacts related to other changes to forestland. Analysis indicates that there are
no impacts to forestland from the related project or related projects. Therefore, the incremental effects of
the proposed project related to other changes to forestland are not significant when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects,the effects of related projects.
Ofher Changes to Farmland or Forestland
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in cumulatively
considerable agricultural impacts related to other changes to farmland or forestland. Analysis indicates
that there are no impacts to farmland or forestland from the related project or related projects. Therefore,
the incremental effects of the proposed project related to other changes to farmland or forestland are not
significant when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative agricultural and farestry resource impacts is provided in Table 6-4,
Cumulative Agricultural and Forestry Resource Impacts Summary. Based on the information presented
above related to farmland, Williamson Act, and other changes to farmland, the proposed project would
not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon cumulative
agriculture and forest resources.
City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013 Page 6-11
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-4: Cumulative Agricultural and Forestry Resources Impact Summary
Environmental Issue
Potential Im acts
Farmland Williamson Act Other Changes to Farmland
A riculture and Forestr
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates NI NI NI
East Oran e GPA NI NI NI
Hol Se ulcher Cemeter NI NI NI
Salem Lutheran Church Ex ansion NI NI NI
Santia o Canyon Colle e NI NI NI
Villa Park Self-Storage NI NI NI
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Pro�ect) NI NI NI
Cumulative NI NI NI
Notes:
l. Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental lmpact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplementa!F.IR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No.1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=1ess than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=1ess than significant with related project miYigation
LTCC=1ess than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(VIST,9).
6.3.3 Air Quality
Introduction
This section will analyze air quality impacts related to the potential for violating air quality significance
thresholds established by the SCAQMD dealing with the project emissions generated during construction
and operation, to the exposure of sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations and to the creation of
objectionable odors.
Proposed Project Air Quality Analysis
Based on the information provided in Section 5.3, Air Quality of this Draft EIR, the proposed project
would impact air quality. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-19, the project
impacts related to air quality plans would be reduced. However, there would remain a significant
unavoidable impacts related to air quality plans, as the proposed project would conflict with the
SCAQMD AQMP from regional NOx emissions and local PM10 concentrations during the grading phase
and with VOC emissions during the application of architectural coatings phase. With the inclusion of
Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-19, the project impact related to air quality standards/violations
would be reduced. However, there would remain a significant unavoidable impact related to violating air
quality standards/violations from regional NOx emissions during the grading phase. With the inclusion of
Page 6-12 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-4, the project impact related to criteria pollutants would be
reduced. However,there would remain a significant unavoidable impact related to criteria pollutants from
short-term construction-related cumulative impacts. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure AQ-1
through AQ-19,the project impact related to sensitive receptors would be reduced to less than significant.
The proposed project would have a less than significance impact related to odors and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Project
Based on the information provided in the EIR, the long-term air quality impacts of the project related to
vehicle emissions and stationary sources would be less than significant. Short-term construction impacts
to regional air quality were demonstrated as less than significant. There were no impacts from any CO
"hot spots". With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the proposed project's
contribution to air quality is significant and unavoidable related to local air quality during the short-term
construction phase associated with grading operations. Refer to the Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates
Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 far the specific mitigation measures.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded that the project
would have a significant unavoidable air quality impact related to short-term construction phase. The East
Orange General Plan Amendment project would result in a significant air quality impact related to long-
term operational phase. The CO "hot spot" analysis concluded that impacts would be less than
significant. No impacts to the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and
the creation of objectionable odors were idenrified.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The Holy Sepulcher Cemetery environmental document concluded that impacts to air quality during the
short-term construction period would be less than significant with mirigation. Refer to the Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 far specific
mitigation measures. Impacts to air quality during the long-term operational phase were determined to be
less than significant. No CO"hot spot" impacts were identified.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR indicates that: the project will not
conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; the project will not violate any
air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation; the project
will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors); and, the project will not
expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-13
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Further, the Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR indicates that during
construction, certain operations such as laying asphalt pavement, applying paint/protective coatings, and
applying some roofing materials, would generate odors that may be noticeable to nearby
residents/landowners. Such odors are not unusual in residential areas and last only a matter of a few days.
Though noticeable, such odors do not result in significant nuisance or health risk. Facility operations
would not involve any activities, materials, or chemicals that would have the potential to cause odor
impact affecting a substantial number of people. The impacts are less than significant, and no further
study of this issue was required.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The environmental documentation prepared for the Santiago Canyon College concluded that impacts
related to conflicting with the air quality management plan were less than significant and did not require
mitigation. Impacts related to violation of air quality standards, and a net increase in criteria pollutants,
exposure to sensitive receptors, and creation of objectionable odors were rendered less than significant
with mitigation. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation
measures.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
The site inspection of the proposed Villa Park Self-Storage by Michael Bradman Associates revealed that
the site is adjacent to an existing residential neighborhood. Air quality impacts from this proposed project
would result from short-term construction phase to sensitive receptors involving the site mass grading
activities far the new buildings and parking, construction of new buildings, and construction of internal
drive aisles and parking areas.
The itinerant nature of users of this type of land use would be expected to result in less than significant
impacts to air quality related to vehicle emissions, creation of objectionable odors, and exposure of
sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations during the long-term operational phase.
Analysis
Air Quality Plan
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would result in significant impacts to air
quality plans. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-19, the project impacts
related to air quality plans would be reduced. However, there would remain a significant unavoidable
impacts related to air quality plans, as the proposed project would conflict with the SCAQMD AQMP
from regional NOx emissions during the grading phase. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran
Church, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College would have less than significant
impacts on air quality plans. Significant impacts were found for East Orange General Plan Amendment,
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, and Villa Park Self-Starage projects.
Based on the analysis noted above, the related projects and the proposed project when combined
potentially violated an air quality plan. The proposed project would violate an air quality plan.
Consequently, there would be an incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to air
Page 6-14 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
quality plans, when viewed in connection with related projects. Therefore, there would be an incremental
effect which could be cumulatively considerable, project mitigation and related mitigation measures are
required; however no cumulative mitigation measures would be required because all feasible mitigation
measures have been required for the individual projects.
Air Quality Standards/Violations
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would result in significant impacts to air
quality standards/violations. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-19, the project
impact related to air quality standards/violations would be reduced. However, there would remain a
significant unavoidable impact related to violating air quality standards/violations from regional NOx
emissions during the grading phase. Analysis indicates that Salem Lutheran Church, Holy Sepulcher
Cemetery, and Villa Park Self-Storage projects would have less than significant impacts on air quality
standardsbiolations. Mitigation measures were provided for the East Orange General Plan Amendment,
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates and Santiago Canyon College projects to reduce impacts to less than
significant levels.
Based on the information provided above, there would be incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to air quality standards/violations, when viewed in connection with the effects of
related projects. Therefore, there would be an incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable, project mitigation and related project mitigation measures are required; however, no
cumulative mitigation measures would be required because all feasible mitigation measures have been
required for the individual projects.
Criteria Pollutants
The proposed project,when combined with the related projects,would result in significant impacts related
to criteria pollutants. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 through AQ-19, the project impact
related to criteria pollutants would be reduced. However, there would remain a significant unavoidable
impact related to criteria pollutants from short-term construction-related cumulative impacts. Analysis
indicates that Salem Lutheran Church, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and Villa Park Self-Storage projects
would have less than significant impacts related to criteria pollutants. Mitigation measures were provided
for East Orange General Plan Amendment and Santiago Canyon College projects to reduce impacts to
less than significant levels. The Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project would have a significant
unavoidable impact related to criteria pollutants. Based on the information provided above, there would
be incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to criteria pollutants, when viewed in
connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be an incremental effect which
could be cumulatively considerable, project mitigation and related project mitigation measures are
required; however,no cumulative mitigation measures are feasible and would not be required.
Sensitive Receptors
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would result in significant impacts
sensitive receptors due to local PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations during grading of the proposed project.
With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 through AQ-19, the project impact related to sensitive
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-15
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
receptors would be reduced to a less than significant impact. Analysis indicates that East Orange General
Plan Amendment would have no impacts on sensitive receptors. Less than significant impacts were found
for Salem Lutheran Church and Holy Sepulcher Cemetery. Mitigation measures were provided for
Santiago Canyon College and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer
to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. Significant
impacts could be found for Villa Park Self-Storage. While mitigation measures would be implemented,
the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project would have a significant unavoidable impact related to sensitive
receptors. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the
specific mitigation measures.
Based on the information provided above, there would be incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project sensitive receptors, when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects.
Therefore, there would be an incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable, project
mitigation and related project mitigation measures are required; however, no cumulative mitigation
measures would be required because all feasible mitigation measures have been incorporated into the
individual projects.
Odors
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
odors. Analysis indicates that East Orange General Plan Amendment and Santiago Canyon College
would have no impacts on sensitive receptors. Less than significant impacts were found for Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Villa Park Self-
Storage, and the proposed project.
Based on the analysis above there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project
related to sensitive receptors, when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative air quality impacts is provided in Table 6-5, Cumulative Air Quality Impact
Summary. Based on the information presented above related air quality plans, air quality standards /
violations, criteria pollutants, and sensitive receptors, the proposed project and related projects would
have a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect even when project
mitigation and related project mitigation measures are required. No cumulative mitigation measures
would be required, as all project and related project mitigation measures address air quality impacts.
Based on the information presented above related to odors there would be no incremental effect which
could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Page 6-16 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-5: Cumulative Air Quality Impact Summary
Potentiallm acts
Environmental Issue pQ
AQ Plan Standards/ Criteria Sensitive Odors
Violations Pollutants Receptors
Air ualit
Rid eline E uestrian Estates SIG-PM LTS-M SIG-PM SIG-PM LTS
East Oran e GPA SIG LTS-M LTS-M NI NI
Hol Se ulcher Cemeter LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS
Salem Lutheran Church Ex ansion LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS
Santia o Can on Colle e LTS LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M NI
Villa Park Self-Stora e SIG LTS LTS SIG LTS
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Pro'ect) SIG-PM SIG-PM SIG-PM LTS-M LTS
Cumulative SIGCC-PM SIGCC-PM SIGCC-PM SIGCC-PM LTCC
&RPM &RPM &RPM
tvoces:
1. Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates Environmenta/Impact Report,June,20l].
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No.1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Guther•an Church and School Specrfic Plan Drafi EIR,February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=1ess than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=1ess than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
STGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(VIST,4).
6.3.4 Biological Resources
Introduction
This section will analyze biological resources impacts related to the special status species, habitats,
riparian areas, wetlands, movement of any migratory species, local policies related to protection of
biological resources, and conformance with habitat conservation programs.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.4, Biological Resources, of this Draft EIR, the proposed
project would have less than significant impacts related to biological resources. The impacts are rendered
less than significant as follows: the proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF BIO-1
through PDF BIO-9 and PDF BIO-12) and Mitigation Measure (MM BIO-1), would have less than
significant impacts to sensitive wildlife species. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design
Features (PDF's) and mitigation measures would have less than significant impacts to least Bell's vireo.
The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF BIO-11) and mitigation measures (MM
BIO-2), would have less than significant impacts to sensitive plant species. The proposed project,
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-17
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF BIO-13 and PDF BIO-14) and mitigation measures (MM BIO-
3), would have less than significant impacts to jurisdictional features. The proposed project, inclusive of
Project Design Features (PDF's) and mitigation measures (MM BIO-4), would have less than significant
impacts to migratory and/or nesting birds. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF BIO-11) and mitigation measures (MM BIO-5), would have less than significant impacts to
regulated trees. The proposed project would have less than significant impacts to conservation plans.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates would have a less than
significant impact on habitat modification or sensitive species, wetlands, or conflict with conservation
plans. The effects on wildlife species, sensitive plant species, and nesting birds were determined to be
less than significant with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. Refer to the
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation
measures. No impacts to riparian habitat, Federally and State protected wetlands, or wildlife corridors
would occur. The Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project also conforms to the provisions of the Natural
Communities Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) and its Implementation
Agreement for the taking of coastal sage scrub and payment of fees. The Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
project also conforms to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded that impacts
related to special status species and habitats, riparian habitat, wetlands, and conflicts with the provisions
of the Natural Communities Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan were less than significant with
mitigation. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for
specific mitigation measures. No impacts to the movement of any migratory species were identified.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The Holy Sepulcher Cemetery environmental document concluded that no impacts to special status
species, habitats, riparian areas, wetlands, movement of any migratory species, and conformance with
habitat conservation programs would result. Impacts related to local policies related to the City's Tree
Preservation Ordinance and the protections of migratory birds were determined to be less than significant.
Sa/em Lutheran Church Expansion Project
A site inspection by Michael Bradman Associates has disclosed that the Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion is fully developed with a church campus and contains mature ornamental landscaping and an
open grass field.
The Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR indicates that this project would not
impact special status species, habitats, riparian areas,wetlands, movement of any migratory species, local
policies related to protection of biological resources, and conformance with habitat conservation
programs. As no impacts to this topical issue were identified no mitigation would be required.
Page 6-18 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Santiago Canyon College Project
The environmental document prepared for the Santiago Canyon College project concluded that impacts to
biological resources were less than significant and with the exception of impacts related to wildlife and
wetlands, did not require any mitigation measures. The environmental document found that the Santiago
Canyon Project may result in short-term and long-term impacts to wildlife, such as loss of foraging
habitat. Mitigation measures required Santiago Canyon College to have a biologist monitor grading and
relocate any wildlife species observed within the grading limits to suitable habitat that will not be
impacted by the proposed project. Further, the environmental document found that the Santiago Canyon
Project is anticipated to potentially impact non-wetland waters and mitigation is required. Mitigation
measures required Santiago Canyon College to receive permits from the Corps, California Department of
Fish and Game [CDFG now California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)], Regional Water
Quality Control Board(RWQCB).
Villa Park Self-Storage Project
The site inspection of the proposed Villa Park Self-Storage by Michael Bradman Associates revealed that
this site is adjacent to an existing residential neighbarhood to the south, a fire station to the east, and at the
intersection of Santiago Canyon Road. Development of this site would not likely result in impacts to
special status species, habitats, riparian areas, wetlands, movement of any migratory species, and
conformance with habitat conservation programs. Development of the Villa Park Self-Storage site would
not result in impacts to special status species, habitats,riparian areas, wetlands, movement of a migratory
species due to their observed absence from the site. The Villa Park Self-Storage project would be
required to comply with the provisions for the Tree Preservation Ordinance should the palm trees be
proposed for removal.
Analysis
Effects on Species
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects,would not result in significant impacts on
species. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF BIO-1 through PDF BIO-15)
and Mitigation Measure (MM BIO-1 through MM BIO-5), would have less than significant impacts to
effects on species, riparian habitats or sensitive communities, Federally protected wetlands, wildlife
corridors and nursery sites, and policies and ordinances. These PDF's and mitigation measures are
discussed in detail in Secrion 5.4, Biological Resources. Mitigation measures were provided for
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Santiago Community College, and the East Orange General Plan
Amendment. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the
specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Community College Final EIR, May 2005 for the
specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
These conclusions standing alone do not preclude the potential for a cumulative impact. An impact could
arise if one or more of the related projects and the proposed project combined had a significant affect the
same species and that could not mitigated to a less than significant level. Based on the information
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-19
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
provided above, none of the related projects would have a significant impact on effects on species.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
effects on species when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. This is because none of
the projects, alone or combined, result in significant, unmitigated impacts. Therefore, there would be no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Riparian Habitat or Sensitive Communities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects,would not result in significant impacts on
riparian habitat or sensitive communities. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF BIO-11) and mitigation measures (MM BIO-2), would have less than significant impacts to
sensitive plant species. The information noted above indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, and Villa Park Self-Storage Starage would have no impacts on riparian
habitat ar sensitive communities. Less than significant impacts were found for Santiago Canyon College.
Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan
Amendment, and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
These conclusions standing alone do not preclude the potential for a cumulative impact. An impact could
arise if one or more of the related projects and the proposed project combined had a significant effect on
the same riparian habitat or sensitive communities and were not mitigated to a less than significant level.
Based on the information provided above, none of the related projects would have a significant impact on
riparian habitat or sensitive communities. This is because none of the projects, alone or combined, result
in significant, unmitigated impacts. Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of
the proposed project related to riparian habitat or sensitive communities when viewed in connection with
the related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Federally Protected Wetlands
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects,would not result in significant impacts on
Federally protected wetlands. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF BIO-13
and 14) and mitigation measures (MM BIO-3), would have less than significant impacts to jurisdictional
features. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and Villa
Park Self-Storage would have no impacts on Federally protected wetlands. Less than significant impacts
were found for the proposed project. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less
than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June,
2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon
College Final EIR,May 2005 far the specific mitigation measures.
These conclusions standing alone do not preclude the potential for a cumulative impact. An impact could
arise if one or more of the related projects and the proposed project combined had a significant affect on
the same Federally protected wetlands and were not mitigated to a less than significant level. Based on
Page 6-20 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed
project related to Federally protected wetlands when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Wildlife Corridors and Nursery Sites
The proposed project,when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
wildlife corridors and nursery sites. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's)
and Mitigation Measures (MM BIO-4), would have less than significant impacts to migratory and/or
nesting birds. Based on the data provided above, the East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and Villa Park Self-Storage would have no
impacts on wildlife corridors and nursery sites. Less than significant impacts were found for Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates and Santiago Canyon College. Mitigation measures were provided for the proposed
project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
These conclusions standing alone do not preclude the potential for a cumulative impact. An impact could
arise if one or more of the related projects and the proposed project combined had a significant affect on
the same wildlife corridor and nursery site and were not mitigated to a less than significant level. Based
on the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed
project related to wildlife corridor and nursery site when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. This is because
none of the projects, alone ar combined, result in significant, unmitigated impacts. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Policies and Ordinances
The proposed project,when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
policies and ardinances. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF BIO-11) and
mitigation measures (MM BIO-5), would have less than significant impacts to regulated trees. Based on
the analysis provided above, it would be anticipated that the Villa Park Self-Storage project would not
have impacts on adopted County policy related to biological resources. Less than significant impacts
were found for Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Santiago Canyon College and the proposed project. Mitigation
measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates and East Orange General Plan Amendment to
reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental
Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan
Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
All related projects are required to comply with applicable City Ordinances. Consequently, there would
be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to policies and ordinances when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-21
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
of probable future projects. Therefare,there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Conservation Plans
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
conservation plans. The proposed project would have less than significant impacts to conservation plans.
Based on the information provided about the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and Villa Park Self-Storage would
have no impacts on policies and ordinances. Less than significant impacts were found for Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, Santiago Canyon College, and the proposed project. Mitigation measures
were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates and East Orange General Plan Amendment to reduce
impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact
Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan
Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
When viewed in combination, these projects would affect the NCCP/HCP. However, all of the projects
are required to comply with the applicable NCCP/HCP. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to conservation plans when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative aesthetic impacts is provided in Table 6-6, Cumulative Biological
Resources Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above related effects on species,
riparian habitat or sensitive communities, Federally and State protected wetlands, wildlife corridors and
nursery sites, policies and ordinances, and conservation plans, the proposed project would not have a
significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon cumulative biological
resources impacts.
Page 6-22 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-6: Cumulative Biological Resources Impact Summary
Potential im acts
Environmentallssue Effects Riparian Federally W��dlife
on Habitat or protected Corridors Policies � Conservation
Species Sensitive yyetlands � Nursery Ordinances Plans
Communities Sites
Biolo ical Resources
Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates' LTS-RPM LTS-RPM LTS-RPM LTS LTS-RPM LTS-RPM
East Oran e GPA LTS-RPM LTS-RPM LTS-RPM NI LTS-RPM LTS-RPM
Holy Sepulcher NI NI NI NI LTS NI
Cemeter 3
Salem Lutheran Church NI NI NI NI LTS LTS
Ex ansion
Santiago Canyon LTS LTS-PM LTS-RPM LTS LTS LTS
Colle e5
Villa Park Self-Stora e NI NI NI NI NI NI
Rio Santiago(Proposed LTS-PM LTS-PM LTS-PM LTS-PM LTS-PM LTS
Pro'ect 6
LTCG LTCC-RPM LTCC- LTCG LTCC-RPM
Cumulative RPM& &PM RPM& RPM& &PM LTCG RPM
PM PM PM
Notes:
1. Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005.
3. Ho/y Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitiga[ed Negative Dedaration No.1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=1ess than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI—no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(V[STA).
6.3.5 Cultural Resources
Introduction
This section will analyze cultural resources impacts related to historical resources, archaeological
resources,paleontological and unique geologic resources,and human remains.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.5, Cultural Resources, of this Draft EIR, the proposed
project would have less than significant impacts on historical resources. Additionally, the proposed
project would have less than significant impacts with mitigation on archaeological resources,
paleontological and unique geological resources, and human remains.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-23
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, impacts to archeological resources, paleontological and
unique geological resources, and human remains would be less than significant with mitigation. Refer to
the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 20ll far the specific mitigation
measures. No impacts to historical resources were identified.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document determined that impacts to
archaeological resources, paleontological resources, or the accidental discovery of human remains would
be less than significant with mitigation. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. No impacts to historical resources
were identified.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery concluded that no impacts related to
historical resources, archaeological resources, or paleontological resources would occur. Impacts related
to accidental discovery of human remains was determined to be less than significant without mitigation.
Sa/em Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project proposes an expansion to an existing facility. The Salem
Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR indicates that this project would not impact historic
resources, archaeological resources, paleontological resources, or the accidental discovery of human
remains would be less than significant with mitigation. As no impacts to this topical issue were
identified no mitigation would be required.
Santiago Canyon Co//ege Project
The environmental document prepared for the Santiago Canyon College determined that impacts related
to historical resources, archaeological resources, paleontological resources, and the accidental discovery
of human remains would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures. Refer to
the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
According to a site inspection by Michael Brandman Associates, the Villa Park Self-Storage site does not
contain any structures. No impacts to historical resources would result. Ground disturbing activities
could impact archaeological, paleontological resources, or the accidental discovery of human remains
should these resources be present on the project site. A cultural resources study would be required to
determine the potential impacts to cultural resources. However, these impacts could be mitigated to less
than significant levels,by standard mitigation for disturbing archaeological,paleontological resources,the
accidental discovery of human remains.
Page 6-24 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Analysis
Historical Resources
The proposed project,when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
historical resources. Analysis indicates that East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher
Cemetery, and Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have no impacts on histarical resources sites.
While no site specific analysis was conducted on related to the Villa Park Self-Storage, site inspection by
Michael Brandman Associates indicates that no structures are located on the site, less than significant
impact on historic resources would be anticipate. Less than significant impacts were found for Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates and the proposed project. Mitigation measures were provided for Santiago Canyon
College to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final
EIR, May 2005 far the specific mitigation measures.
No incremental increase to historical resources would result from combining the proposed project with
the related projects. Historical resources are site-specific and no cumulative significant adverse impacts
are expected from new developments, with implementation of site-level surveys, compliance with the
applicable City Historic Preservation Ordinance and recommended mitigation measures that could be
incorporated into future environmental documentation. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to historical resources on-site when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Archaeological Resources
The proposed project,when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
archaeological resources. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion projects would have no impacts on archaeological resources. Mitigation measures were
provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Santiago Canyon
College, and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 20ll for the specific mitigation measures. Refer
to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation
measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation
measures. While no site specific analysis was conducted on related to the Villa Park Self-Storage, site
inspection by Michael Brandman Associates indicates that no structures are locate on the site, less than
significant impact on archaeological resources would be anticipated.
No incremental increase to archaeological resources would result from combining the proposed project
with the related projects. Archaeological resources are site-specific and no cumulative significant adverse
impacts are expected from new developments, with implementation of site-level surveys, and
recommended mitigation measures including those that could be incorporated into future environmental
documentation for the Villa Park Self-Storage projects. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to archaeological resources when viewed in connection
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-25
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Paleontological and Unique Geological Resources
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
paleontological and unique geological resources. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion projects would not have impacts on paleontological and unique
geological resources. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange
General Plan Amendment, Santiago Canyon College, and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less
than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June,2011
for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental
EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR,
May 2005 far the specific mitigation measures. While no site specific analysis was conducted on related
to the Villa Park Self-Storage, site inspection by Michael Brandman Associates indicates that no
structures are locate on the site, less than significant impact on paleontological and unique geological
resources would be anticipate.
No incremental increase to paleontological and unique geological resources would result from combining
the proposed project with the related projects. Paleontological and unique geological resources are site-
specific and no cumulative significant adverse impacts are expected from new developments, with
implementation of site-level surveys, and recommended mitigation measures including those that could
be incorporated into future environmental documentation far the Villa Park Self-Storage projects
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
paleontological and unique geological resources when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Human Remains
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts on
human remains. Analysis indicates that all projects would or would likely have mitigation measures to
reduce impacts to a less than significant level on human remains. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 20ll for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific
mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific
mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November
2005 for specific mitigation measures.
No incremental increase to human remains would result from combining the proposed project with the
related projects. Human remains are site-specific and no cumulative significant adverse impacts are
expected from new developments, with implementation of site-level surveys, and recommended
Page 6-26 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
mitigation measures including those that could be incorporated into future environmental documentation
for the Villa Park Self-Storage projects. Consequently,there would be no incremental or combined effects
of the proposed project related to human remains when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there
is no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation measures
are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative aesthetic impacts is provided in Table 6-7, Cumulative Cultural Resources
Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above related historical resources, archaeological
resources, paleontological and unique geological resources, and human remains, the proposed project
would not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon
cumulative cultural resources.
Table 6-7: Cumulative Cultural Resources Impact Summary
Potential Im acts
Historical Archaeological Paleontological Human
Environmental Issue Resources Resources and Unique Remains
Geological
Resources
Cultural Resources
Rid eline E uestrian Estates LTS LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M
East Oran e GPA NI LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M
Hol Se ulcher Cemete NI NI NI NI
Salem Lutheran Church NI NI NI NI
Ex ansion
Santia o Can on Colle e LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M
Villa Park Self-Stora e NI LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M
Rio Santiago(Proposed LTS LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M
Pro'ect)6
Cumulative LTCC LTCC-PM LTCC-PM LTCC-PM
Notes:
1. Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR.November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
S. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively wnsiderable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM & RPM = significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project
mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Communiry Planners(ViSTA).
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-27
Rio Sanfiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
5.3.6 Geology and Soils
Introduction
This section will analyze geology and soils impacts related to geologic events such as the rupture of a
known earthquake fault, seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure including liquefaction,
landslides, erosion and loss of topsoil, unstable geologic units, expansive soils, or soils incapable of
supporting septic systems.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.6, Geology and Soils, of this Draft EIR, the proposed
project would have no impacts on septic tanks. The proposed project would have less than significant
impacts on erosion and unstable geological location. Additionally, the proposed project would have less
than significant impacts with mitigation on earthquake, ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, and
expansive soils.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the Draft EIR , no impacts related to liquefaction or loss of topsoil
was identified. Potentially significant impacts related to seismic groundshaking and expansive soils were
rendered less than significant with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded impacts related to
rupture of a known earthquake fault, seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure including
liquefaction, landslides, erosion and loss of topsoil, unstable geologic units, and expansive soils were
rendered less than significant with mitigation. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. No impacts were identified related
to soils incapable of supporting septic systems.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery concluded that no impacts would occur
related to seismic-related ground failure including liquefaction, landslides, unstable geologic conditions,
expansive soils, or soils incapable of supporting septic systems. Impacts related to rupture of an
earthquake fault or seismic ground shaking was determined to be less than significant. Impacts related to
soil erosion or loss of topsoil was rendered less than significant with mitigation. Refer to the Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific
mitigation measures.
Sa/em Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project proposes to construct a new sanctuary on an existing
church campus and would require site grading activities and potentially below-grade excavations. The
Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR indicates that this project would not impact
Page 6-28 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
geologic events such as the rupture of a known earthquake fault, seismic ground shaking, seismic-related
ground failure including liquefaction, landslides, erosion, and loss of topsoil, unstable geologic units,
expansive soils, or soils incapable of supporting septic systems. As no impacts to this topical issue were
identified no mitigation would be required.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The Santiago Canyon College environmental document concluded that impacts related to seismic ground
failure including liquefaction, unstable geologic unit, and soils incapable of supporting septic systems
were less than significant and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to seismic ground shaking,
landslides, erosion and loss of topsoil, and expansive soils were rendered less than significant with
mitigation. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation
measures.
Villa Park Self-Storage Project
The Villa Park Self-Storage site would construct buildings and perform site grading activities that would
be subject to seismic ground shaking due to proximity to lrnown faults in the vicinity of the site. No
preliminary geotechnical studies have been prepared far this project. Based on a site visit by Michael
Brandman Associates, the project site is level and no landslide potenrial exists. City Staff has noted that
undocumented fill slopes may exist on the Villa Park Self-Storage site (Letter City of Orange, February 9,
2010). Any development of the Villa Park Self-Storage site would require preliminary geotechnical
studies reviewed by the City Staff prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. The Villa Park
Self-Storage project does not propose the use of septic systems, so no impacts related to soils incapable of
supporting septic systems would result. As a result, the potential for seismic related ground failure
including liquefaction, unstable geologic conditions, or both,remains potentially significant as well as the
potential for liquefaction.
Analysis
Earthquake/Ground Shaking/Liquefaction/Landslides
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impact
related to earthquakes, ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides. Analysis indicates that Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Santiago Canyon
College, and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts with the mitigation measures
provided. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the
specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the
Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The data provided
in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have no
impacts related to this topical issue. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this
writing.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-29
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Groundshaking hazards associated with regional earthquakes may occur in the project area. Although
there are measures to prepare for an earthquake, the actual impact of an earthquake event cannot be
predicted. Should a major earthquake occur along the nearby faults, structural damage to the project area
could be sustained. Developments located near the fault would generally suffer more damage than those
farther away from the fault, depending on local soil conditions. Compliance with seismic design criteria
in the Uniform Building Code would limit damage to proposed structures and infrastructure. Seismic
risks associated with the project site, when considered with the related projects, would not be regarded as
cumulatively significant.
Impacts from earthquake, ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides regarding the Villa Park Self-
Storage projects would be determined by site-specific geotechnical studies. Mitigation measures
developed in response to future geotechnical studies and incorporated into future environmental
documentation would likely result in less than significant impacts. Adding the proposed project to the
related projects would not result in an incremental increase to impacts from earthquake, ground shaking,
liquefaction, and landslides and no cumulatively considerable impacts would result.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
earthquake, ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore,
there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation
measures are required.
Erosion
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to erosion. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and the proposed project would have
less than significant impacts related to erosion. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates, Santiago Community College, and East Orange General Plan Amendment to reduce
impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact
Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan
Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific
mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific
mitigation measures. The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran
Church Expansion would have no impacts related to this topical issue. The Villa Park Self-Starage has
no determination at the time of this writing.
Any erosion impacts to the Villa Park Self-Storage project would be site specific. If Villa Park Self-
Storage had an impact related to erosion, the proposed project impacts were determined to be less than
significant and would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Consequently, there would be
no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to erosion when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
Page 6-30 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Unstable Geo/ogic Location
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to an unstable geologic location. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion projects would have no impacts related to an unstable geologic location.
Less than significant impacts were found for Santiago Canyon College and the proposed project.
Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, and East Orange General Plan
Amendment to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange
General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. The data
provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have
no impacts related to this topical issue. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of
this writing.
Any unstable geological location impacts to the Villa Park Self-Storage projects would be site specific.
Any development of the Villa Park Self-Storage sites would require preliminary geotechnical studies
reviewed by the City prior to the issuance of any grading ar building permit. If an impact related to an
unstable geological location were to be discovered the City would require corrective actions prior to
development. Therefore, the impacts have been determined to be less than significant and would not
contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to an unstable geological location when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Expansive Soi/s
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to expansive soils. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion projects would have no impacts related to expansive soils. Mitigation measures were provided
for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Santiago Canyon College, and
the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East
Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The
Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Any expansive soils impacts to the Villa Park Self-Storage projects would be site specific. Any
development of the Villa Park Self-Storage sites would require preliminary geotechnical studies reviewed
by the City prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. If an impact related to an expansive
soil were to be discovered,the City would require corrective actions prior to development. Therefore, the
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-31
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
impacts were determined to be less than significant and would not contribute to a cumulatively
considerable impact. Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed
project related to expansive soils when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Septic Tanks
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to septic tanks. Analysis indicates that all related projects and the proposed projects would have
no impacts related to septic tanks. Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of
the proposed project related to septic tanks when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there is no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative geology and soils impacts is provided in Table 6-8, Cumulative Geology
and Soils Impact Summary. Any development of the Villa Park Self-Storage site would require
preliminary geotechnical studies reviewed by the City prior to the issuance of any grading or building
permit. If an impact related to geology and soils were to be discovered the City would require corrective
actions prior to development. These potential impacts were determined to be less than significant and
would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Therefore, based on the information
presented above, related to earthquake, groundshaking, liquefaction and landslides; erosion; unstable
geological location; expansive soil; and, septic tanks the project does not have a significant potential to
have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon cumulative geology and soils change impacts.
Page 6-32 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-8: Cumulative Geology and Soils Impact Summary
PotentialIm acts
Environmental Issue Earthquake Erosion Unstable Expansive Septic Tank
Ground Shaking Geological Soil
Liquefaction Location
Landslides
Geolo and Soils
Rid eline E uestrian Estates LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M NI
East Oran e GPA LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M NI
Hol Se ulcher Cemete LTS-M LTS-M NI NI NI
Salem Lutheran Church NI NI NI NI NI
Ex ansion4
Santia o Can on Colle e LTS-M LTS-M LTS LTS-M NI
Villa Park Self-Stora e NDM NDM NDM NDM NI
Rio Santiago(Proposed LTS-M LTS LTS LTS-M NI
Pro'ect)6
Cumulative LTCC-PM LTCC LTCC LTCC-PM NI
Notes:
1. Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
S. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=1ess than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=1ess than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=1ess than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(V[ST,a).
6.3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Introduction
This section will analyze impacts on Global Climate Change (GCC) occur from Greenhouse Gas
Emissions (GHG) that contribute to global warming including impacts to air quality, water supply,
flooding, and increases in health related problems.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this Draft EIR, the
proposed project impacts are as follows. The proposed project's generation of GHG, inclusive of Project
Design Features (PDF's GHG-1 and GHG-4) would be less than significant and no mitigation measures
would be required. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to conflicting
with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases and no mitigation measures would be required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-33
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Project
The Ridgeline Equestrian Estates EIR, states that:
With respect to both air quality and global climate change, all long-term operational phase air
quality impacts evaluated in this section were found to be either less than significant and not
requiring evaluation or, in the case of global climate change, not susceptible to further evaluation
beyond the extensive discussion and information presented in this section. All of the PDFs would
further reduce the less than significant impacts of the long-term operational phase below the level of
significance. PDF-AQ-1 and PDF-AQ-2 provides for on-site approximately one mile perimeter and
regional trails and approximately 0.7 miles of internal, private trails that would encourage non-
vehicular activity that would reduce vehicle emissions. PDF-AQ-3 would assist in the reduction of
electrical consumption that would reduce power consumption and the production of greenhouse
gasses. PDF-AQ-S and PDF-AQ-6 provide for the future use of electric or electric-hybrid vehicles
and solar panels that would assist in the reduction of electrical consumption that would reduce power
consumption and the production of greenhouse gasses (Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental
Impact Report,June, 2010).
East Orange GPA Project
A GHG analysis was not prepared far this project.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
This project did not prepare a stand-alone GHG study, however included a GHG analysis within the
environmental document. The environmental document concluded that implementation of this project
would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to GHG or global warming and emissions
were below the City's Guidance Memo threshold 10,000 metric tons per year of CO2.
Sa/em Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
would have less than significant impacts related to this topical issue.
Santiago Canyon College Project
A GHG analysis was not prepared for this project.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
A GHG analysis was not prepared for this project.
Analysis
Greenhouse Gas
The proposed project and cumulative projects are anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area
sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste, water, and construction equipment. This necessary
component of a cumulative impact analysis cannot be provided as part of this evaluation. Obviously, a
Page 6-34 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
list of past, current, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects throughout the world which
potentially contribute to global climate change would not be feasible to assemble. Any attempt to do so
would involve gross speculation. Alternatively, there is not yet an adopted or certified planning
document which contains a summary of projections based on known or likely worldwide projects.
Therefore, absent gross speculation, this Draft EIR cannot feasibly evaluate potential cumulative project
global climate change impacts in the specific manner currently required by CEQA.
Further, any threshold for cumulative significance must delineate a marker for determining whether the
proposed project's effects would be"cumulatively considerable,"meaning"that the incremental effects of
an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of current projects, and the effects of probable future projects." [State CEQA Guidelines Section
15065(a)(3)].
As previously noted, because GCC is the product of GHG emissions throughout the world, it is not
reasonably feasible to identify all past, current, and probable future projects on the planet without gross
speculation. Additionally, evaluation using speculative "per capita" or other projections of worldwide
GHG emissions based upon projections of population growth over many decades may provide valuable
information, but would not constitute an analysis of the "incremental effects" of the project in either of
the contexts identified in Section 15130(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines which are discussed above. For
the purpose of this report, cumulative impact analysis is considered speculative. It will be so considered
until a cumulative impact analytical framework or a significance threshold is established, which meets
current CEQA legal requirements and establishes a basis for evaluating cumulative impacts. The analysis
framework will need to be the equivalent of a general plan or related planning document adopted by a
local agency or the State Legislature.
Section 15145 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides that, "[i]f, after thorough investigation, a lead
agency finds that a particular impact is too speculative for evaluation, the agency should note its
conclusion and terminate discussion of the impact." Technical data does not yet exist that would allow
the City to determine without the use of undue speculation how a project of this size would, relative to
other proposed projects throughout the world, contribute to GCC.
Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this Draft EIR nonetheless presents a substantive discussion
of the effects of global climate and the proposed project's potential GHG emissions. The proposed
project's generation of GHG, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's GHG-1 through GHG-4) would
be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. However, after thorough analysis,
it is concluded that there is no way to determine with reasonable scientific certainty that the proposed
project would incrementally contribute to a significant cumulative impact on GCC. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation
measures are required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-35
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Conflict with Applicable Plan(s)
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to conflicting with any applicable
plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases and no mitigation measures would be required. No analysis related to potential conflicts with
applicable plans was accomplished for the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Project, East Orange GPA
Project, East Orange GPA Project, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project, Santiago Canyon College Project,
and Villa Park Self-Storage projects. The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have no impact related to this topical issue.
The City has adopted an interim policy for GHG emissions that is provided in the GHG Interim Guidance
Memorandum and defines a project as significant if it emits more than 10,000 MTCOZe per year. This
threshold is defined as interim since it shall be preempted when the SCAQMD adopts GHG emissions
thresholds for all projects. Currently, SCAQMD has only adopted a GHG emission threshold of 10,000
MTCOZe for industrial projects where SCAQMD is the lead agency. Since the SCAQMD's threshold
does not apply to residential or commercial sectors at this time, the City's significance threshold is more
conservative because it encompasses emissions from all land use types of projects.
Additionally, the City General Plan has determined that: "If a project generates GHG emissions below
this threshold, it is acceptable to conclude that the project generates GHG emissions but does not result
in a "cumulatively considerable contribution" to GHG's or global warming." (City of Orange General
Plan Program EIR,Page 5.15-19).
The City selected this threshold because it requires mitigation of large development projects that have the
greatest impacts to global warming and the greatest potential for implementing mitigation at a broad
scale, while recognizing that smaller infill projects are not likely to contribute "cumulatively
considerable" emissions and are not the focus of future decisions. The City has adopted an interim policy
for GHG emissions that is provided in the GHG Interim Guidance Memorandum and defines a project as
significant, if it emits mare than 10,000 MTCOZe per year. This threshold is defined as interim since it
shall be preempted when the SCAQMD adopts GHG emissions thresholds for all projects.
The proposed project would generate 7,011.13 MTCOZe per year, which is within the City's 10,000
MTCOze threshold. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy
or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
Related to the City's General Plan project the City found that,
"Adherence to and implementation of regulations, General Plan policies, and implementation of
mitigation measures S.1 S-1 through S.1 S-9, would reduce GHG emissions, but not to a less than
significant level. This impact will remain significant and unavoidable. Individual development
projects will be required to undergo project-specific environmental review. If project-level
significant impacts are identified, specific mitigation measures will be required under CEQA."
(City of Orange General Plan ProgYam EIR, Page 5.15-38 -39).
Page 6-36 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
As stated above, a GHG analysis was not prepared for any of the related projects, except for the Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Projects. The
environmental documents for the above projects concluded that implementation of these projects would
not result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to GHG or global warming and emissions and
were below the City's Guidance Memo threshold 10,000 metric tons per year of CO2.
It would be anticipated that the greatest cumulative impact on related potential conflicts with any
applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases will be the incremental increase from projects. However, in accordance with the City
policy noted above, projects that do not exceed the City criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria
levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. Therefare, with respect to
related potential conflicts with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, the proposed project would create a less than
significant cumulative impact and no cumulative mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative greenhouse gas emission impacts is provided in Table 6-5, Cumulative
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above related
greenhouse gas and the lack of potential conflicts with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an
agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases the proposed project and
related projects would not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental
effect upon cumulative GHG emissions.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-37
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-9: Cumulative Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Summary
Potentiallm acts
Environmental Issue Greenhouse Gas Conflict with Applicable
Plan s
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Rid eline E uestrian Estates LTS NDM
East Oran e GPA NDM NDM
Hol Se ulcher Cemete NDM NDM
Salem Lutheran Church Ex ansion LTS LTS
Santia o Can on Colle e NDM NDM
Villa Park Self-Stora e NDM NDM
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Pro�ect) LTS LTS
Cumulative LTCC LTCC
Notes:
1. Ridgedine Equestrian Estates Environmental impact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Pdan Draft EIR,February 2012.
S. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=1ess than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=1ess tban cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCGPM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(Visra).
6.3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Introduction
This section will analyze hazards and hazardous materials impacts related to the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials; the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment; emit
hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; the presence of hazardous
materials on-site and identified in data lists; cause exposure to hazards from public airport or identified in
airport land use plans; cause exposure to hazards from private airstrips; interference with an adopted
emergency evacuation plan; and,cause exposure to wildland fires.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this Draft EIR,
the proposed project would have no impacts on the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials; emit hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; exposure
to hazards from public airport ar identified in airport land use plans; exposure to hazards from private
airstrips; and, interference with an adopted emergency evacuation plan. The proposed project with the
inclusion of PDF HAZ-1 through PDF HAZ-7 reduces the potential impacts from exposure to wildland
fires to a less than significant level. The proposed project would have less than significant impacts with
Page 6-38 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
mitigation MM HAZ-1 and MM HAZ-2 on effects on the accidental release of hazardous materials into
the environment and the presence of hazardous materials on-site and identified in data lists.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the Draft EIR, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates would not have an
impact on the public through the use and transport of hazardous materials, interfere with an emergency
response plan, use hazardous materials near a school, induce hazards from proximity to an airport, or
from proximity to wildland fires. Potentially significant impacts indicated in the Draft EIR during the
short-term construction period were reduced below significance with the implementation of the
recommended mitigation measures. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact
Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. No long-term significant impacts were
identified.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document determined that less than
significant impacts would result related to the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials, or
the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment, the presence of hazardous materials
on-site, interference with an adopted emergency response plan, and exposure to wildland fires. The site
was not found to have asbestos-containing building materials or electrical transformers, which are a
concern because they could potentially contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). As indicated in the
EIR, the potential to emit hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school
was determined to be less than significant with mitigation. Refer to the East Orange General Plan
Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. No impacts were
identified with airport-related hazards.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery concluded that no impacts would occur
related to the presence of hazardous materials on-site, exposure to airport hazards, interference with an
adopted emergency response plan, or exposure to wildland fires. Impacts related to creating a significant
public hazard through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials, or the accidental
release of hazardous materials into the environment, emit hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school were determined to be less than significant and did not require mitigation
measures.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project proposes conversion of an existing residential housing
unit into a pre-school and construction of a new church sanctuary. The data provided in the Draft EIR for
the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have less than significant impacts
related to this topical issue. Santiago Canyon College Project
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-39
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
The Santiago Canyon College environmental document concluded that no impacts were related to the
presence of hazardous materials on-site or exposure from airport hazards. Impacts related to creating a
significant public hazard through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials, or the
accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment, emit hazardous materials within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, interference with an adopted emergency response plan,
and exposure to wildland fires were determined to be less than significant and did not require mitigation.
Villa Park Self-Storage Project
While it would not be anticipated that the Villa Park Self-Storage project would propose to transport,use,
or dispose of hazardous materials; the City has identified concerns with potential for hazardous material
on the site. Any development of the Villa Park Self-Storage project site would require a hazardous
material reviewed by the City prior to the issuance of any grading, demolition, or building permit. If an
impact related were to be discovered the City would require corrective actions prior to development.
This project would not emit hazardous materials and, as a result, would not impact the school facility
located north of the project site across Santiago Canyon Road or east of the site on Cannon Street. The
shared vehicular access with the adjacent fire station has the potential to interfere with the emergency
response plan that could result in potential impacts. The site is not located within the boundaries of an
adopted airport land use plan or within two miles of a private airstrip; therefore,no airport-related hazards
would result. The determination of on-site hazardous conditions has yet to be determined. Therefare, the
potential for significant impacts related to recognized environmental conditions exists.
Analysis
Routine Transport
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to routine transport of hazardous materials. Analysis indicates that the Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates and the proposed project would have no impacts related to routine transport of hazardous
materials. Less than significant impacts were found for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and Santiago Canyon College. The Villa Park
Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
While, the Villa Park Self-Storage could have an impact related to routine transport of hazardous
materials, the proposed project was determined to have less than significant impacts and would not
contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to routine transport of hazardous materials when viewed
in connection with related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation is required.
Release of Hazardous Materials
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to the accidental release of hazardous materials. Analysis indicates that the Santiago Canyon
College would have no impacts related to the accidental release of hazardous materials. Less than
Page 6-40 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
significant impacts were found for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion, and Holy Sepulcher Cemetery. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determinations at the time
of this writing and worse case was assumed.
State and federal regulatory agencies are responsible for regulating hazardous materials use. Monitoring
by the City Fire Department and other local agencies would promote compliance with the regulations.
Impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials from and the Villa Park Self-Storage project would be
determined by site-specific hazardous studies.
Although, the Villa Park Self-Storage project could have an impact related to the accidental release of
hazardous materials, the proposed project was determined to be less than significant with mitigation and
would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Consequently, there would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to the accidental release of hazardous
materials when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of related projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
cumulative mitigation is required.
Schoo/s
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to hazardous materials in proximity to schools. Analysis indicates that the Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates would have no impacts related hazardous materials in proximity to schools. Villa Park Self-
Storage, while not yet analyzed would inherently have a potential hazardous risk related to hazardous
materials in proximity to schools. Less than significant impacts were found for the Holy Sepulcher
Cemetery, Santiago Canyon College, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and the proposed project.
Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment to reduce impacts to a less
than significant level. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November
2005 for specific mitigation measures.
Although, the Villa Park Self-Storage project could have an impact related to the release of hazardous
materials in proximity to schools, the proposed project was determined to be less than significant with
mitigation and would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Consequently,there would be
no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to the release of hazardous materials in
proximity to schools, when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation is
required.
Database List
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to potential hazards identified on database lists. Analysis indicates that the Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates would have no impacts related to database lists. Less than significant impacts were found for East
Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and
Santiago Canyon College. Mitigation measures MM HAZ-1 and MM HAZ-2 were provided for the
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-41
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant leveL The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determinations at the time of this writing.
Although, the Villa Park Self-Storage could have an impact related to sites listed on hazards and
hazardous materials databases, the proposed project was determined to be less than significant with
mitigation and would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Consequently, there would be
no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to database lists, when viewed in
connection with the effects of related projects. Therefare, there would be no incremental effect which
could be cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation is required.
Airport and Airport Land Use Plans and Private Airstrips
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to airports, airport land use plans, or private airstrips. Analysis indicates that all related projects
(except the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project) and the proposed project would have no impacts
related to airports and airport land use plans because none are within an airport land use plan area. The
data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would
have a less than significant impact related to this topical issue. Consequently, there would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to airports and airport land use plans,
when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental
effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation is required.
Emergency Evacuation Plan
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to emergency evacuation plans. Analysis indicates that the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates and Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery projects would have no impact related emergency evacuation plans. Less than
significant impacts were found for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion, and Santiago Canyon College projects. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at
the time of this writing.
There are no evacuation corridors on or adjacent to the proposed project site depicted on City General
Plan Figure PS-4, Generalized Evacuation Corridors. The nearest evacuation corridor to the proposed
project site is Hewes Street accessed via East Santiago Canyon Road west of Cannon Street. The City
General Plan indicates that all City arterials are recognized as primary emergency response routes. In
addition, non-arterials can be secondary emergency response routes. The City's Residential
Neighborhood Traffic Management Program, identifies traffic management and traffic calming tools, and
specifies that emergency vehicle access should be accommodated consistent with response standards with
implementation of appropriate traffic management measures.
If an emergency situation, the proposed project and cumulative projects could be occupied by residents
and visitors. Overall cumulatively would have the ability to evacuate based on the capacities of the City's
circulation system and the design features of the proposed project. Section 5.17, Transportation and
Page 6-42 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumu�ative
Tra�c demonstrated that the project proposed and cumulative projects would have a less than significant
impact related to all significant thresholds.
Impacts related to emergency evacuation plans from the Villa Park Self-Storage project would be
determined by site-specific study. Although, the Villa Park Self-Storage could have an impact related to
emergency evacuation plan(s), the proposed project was determined to have less than significant impacts
and would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Consequently, there would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to emergency evacuation plans, when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects
of probable future projects. Therefore,there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no cumulative mitigation is required.
Wildfires
The proposed project site is designated in the City General Plan as, "Wildland Very High Fire Hazard
Areas" on Figure PS-1, Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Map. The City requires that any
proposed development located within ar adjacent to the identified wildland fire area must prepare and
implement a comprehensive fuel modification program in accordance with City regulations. PDF HAZ-1
through PDF HAZ-7 reduce this potential impact to a less than significant level by the provision of fuel
modification zones designed, installed, and maintained in order to meet all requirements outlined in the
Guideline for Fuel Modification Plans and Maintenance Program prepared by the Orange County Fire
Authority. All new construction will comply with Chapter 47 and 7A of the California Fire and Building
Codes for local agency very high fire hazard severity zones unless otherwise approved by the City Fire
Department. Project landscaping will consist of plants from the approved fuel modification planting list.
Fuel modification plans will be checked and approved by the Fire Department during the time of which
any other proposed fire protection systems are reviewed.
A Fuel Modification Plan has been reviewed by the City at part of the Major Site Plan review process for
the proposed project. City Fire staff reviewed the design and required emergency vehicle access,per City
Fire Department standards,to the Santiago Creek area. Additionally, a water infrastructure plan for fire -
fighter purposes is required. Therefore, based on the information presented above, the impacts related to
the potential to expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland
fires would be anticipated to have a less than significant impact and no mitigation measures would be
required.
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to wildfires. Analysis indicates that all related projects and the proposed project would have less
than significant impact related to wildfires. Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined
effects of the proposed project related to wildfires, when viewed in connection with the related projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
cumulative mitigation is required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-43
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative hazards and hazardous materials impacts is provided in Table 6-10,
Cumulative Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact Summary. Based on the information presented
above the proposed project and related projects would have less than cumulative considerable impacts
related to hazards and hazardous materials impacts from to the routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials; emit hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school;
exposure to hazards from public airport ar identified in airport land use plans; exposure to hazards from
private airstrips; interference with an adopted emergency evacuation plan; and, exposure to wildland
fires. The proposed project and related projects would have less than cumulatively considerable impacts
with project mitigation related to the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment; the
presence of hazardous materials on-site and identified in data lists. No incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no cumulative mitigation is required.
Page 6-44 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
; a�
.� �o
� arn
� o
U � c�
� o
� m Z
N =° 2
L � � � � � � U �� c�
'�C Z F" Z F" F" Z F" V c .- �
� � � � a ro .o
� °° `c,
� r
o � �3
� �
A C � � �
a �
G � 'Y o
+� U o � >
Gf � tC �" H •-" H H Q � V 'ro .v � c
� � a Z �) '� a �l z '"� a a'° c�a�o
� > � �E a �o �
W W ° � °' o � ??
.� � � � �
� 0D �o ;; � � ;°
� �
Ip y a t ..'b -�o..
� � 'C ° ° � � 3 �� `° �
� O °." a�i c? o
C ro �3 a� �
Q, � tl! �,on'a �A v� �
� a a � ° � i.�
fn Q C � �� � � �, �b ��o >
++ -
V v � ` V � �� a -o' •- c��
°' 'o � � 0 3 ° �
°. � aa zzz F" zzF" v �° �,ybo � � �, a
� 3 m d �l �l F' o,z...'� �,�a�i c�a; �
y a V! .r+ �l 5 " 3 0�.� c?'v...
e0 0 3 � � � G
1p � p -8 ` �� � � ��a a b ro ° w b
�� Q. C. t�0 a .b c w� �.'-., � � °> � � ��a° �
!�'4 � Q J c � �.b0� `�' _ � � � � °° g
� � O �; � C � � y .D � v II
� T b�D ro � U y � U�"' �", � C
G p, F
� = V! ? c �.,^i.� ,ai� c�a G �� � °?
0
� � y �� � � ii ii ° w .� u v�3 Q,�.d
� p J � a ,. � N �� � ? � � � �� a a � .� c
N d G> V� v� v] �, � �°? � a i i a �
�0 N z F-� E-� F q v� U o i`i' ii axUC� U u aUU � ° �
Z � �l �) � Z � V �UE�-� F�-� HHHHC� �7C7c7 � �.� Ca
C +�+ v� r�-� � U •� •� •� �-1aav� v�v� v� �tZZ
� � � �
N
�
� b
N
y c
10
= o z � � � Hz � � �
� � � a a a a a o
�. N � z N
�C g s o
� .-. N .� N
� O ' N -/-+ O � Q �
V N O eC � ,�' a ai � u p
� � �d V� E-+ F-� E-� Z Q v� �j y o O w
O d e0 r+ [ �l �l �l Z H V i z � �
r y � � �) �-1 F o ��- W
N � � a � w � i
� � r2 q
� � � a' � � ti
� C C. � V] C/� C/� V] � V] � � y.� �
� � z �l � �.-a �l z �l F" � � � � o
e0 �, �l o
� � � o � o �A'N
.� .� � �� o ��
w � � � � � � �
C� y � Q CU � � � � �
� � � a � � O � � � N
� � a; O W � � U�� o m
N o ;� � a� a. Q n � � o W s �
'C m y ,� bA .� �� �, U 's U y Q I
� W � c� .� p�p a� � � � � � ° a �
r N � � '� o � O � � s a �� �N'' W
C t� .� Q � U U O o W �S � '� U � � �i�
C � � C7 � � �,`�' Q' '= p � o 'j �o o O o
� � W � � ,�v � V] b�A i .�� � o `°Q o ° o a�o
'; y y � � � o U � ,c� '}^', � W � � �n �C �, ` c�
_ � •� O � "'a 'v� b�A a � � a �c
W � -O v T� � Q � � � ..� �i �; vh �d � p��
� y s.
xr� wxv� wv� > i� U z � ��
6.0 Cumulative
6.3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
Introduction
This section will analyze hydrology and water quality impacts related to the potential for violation of
water quality standards, depletion of groundwater supplies, alteration of existing drainage patterns on the
site and surrounding area, create excess storm water run-off, degrade water quality, placement of
structures within flood zones, exposure from dam failure, and increased erosion.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.9, Hydrology and Water Qualiry of this Draft EIR, the
proposed project would have the impacts noted below. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design
Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than significant impact relating to violation of
any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements and no mitigation measures would be
required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)
would have a less than significant impact related to groundwater supplies/recharge and no mitigation
measures would be required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF-HWQ-9)
would have a less than significant impact related to drainage pattern of the site including through the
alternation of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project, inclusive of
Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-1 through HWQ-8) would have a less than significant impact
related to alteration of existing drainage patterns of the project site and no mitigation measures would be
required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)
would have a less than significant impact related to drainage system capacity and pollutant run-off and no
mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than significant impact related to degrading water
quality and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project would have a less than
significant impact related to housing placement in flood hazard area and no mitigation measures would be
required. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows and no mitigation measures would be required. However, even with
the inclusion of Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, the proposed project impact (Impact HWQ-1) still has a
significant unavoidable impact resulting from being in the path of inundation were a dam break to occur.
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to seismic related inundation and
no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF's HWQ-9) would have a less than significant impact related to construction activities stormwater
run-off and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design
Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than significant impact related to post-
construction activities stormwater run-off and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed
project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than
significant impact related to stormwater pollutants discharge and no mitigation measures would be
required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)would
have a less than significant impact related to stormwater discharge and no mitigation measures would be
required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) have
Page 6-46 City of Orange-Draff EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Projecf
6.0 Cumulative
a less than significant impact related to velocity or volume stormwater run-off and no mitigation measures
would be required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-1 through
HWQ-8) would have a less than significant impact related to velocity or volume stormwater run-off and
no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than significant impact related to erosion and no
mitigation measures would be required.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates would not have any impacts
on water quality standards, erosion or siltation, flooding, placement of housing or other structures in a
flood hazard area, storm water run-off and pollutants during the long-term operational phase of the
project, or impacts related to the velocity of the storm water run-of£ Impacts to water quality were
reduced below the level of significance with the implementation recommended mitigation measures.
Refer to the Ridgeline Equesb^ian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 20ll for the specific
mitigation measures.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded that impacts
related to violation of water quality standards, depletion of groundwater supplies, alteration of existing
drainage patterns on the site and surrounding area, create excess storm water run-off, degrade water
quality, placement of structures within flood zones, exposure from dam failure, and increased erosion
were rendered less than significant with mitigation. Refer to the East Orange Gerreral Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery determined that no impacts were related
to the placement of housing or structures within a flood zone or inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflows. Less than significant impacts were identified for depletion of groundwater supplies and
flooding from dam failure. Impacts related to violation of water quality standards and degradation of
water quality, alteration of drainage patterns, excessive storm water run-off, off-site discharge of
pollutants, increases in flow velocity, and erosion potential were rendered less than significant with
mitigation. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-
06,May 2008 for specific mitigation measures.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project would construct a new sanctuary on the project site over
an existing parking lot and a portion of the grass field. The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project
indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have less than significant impacts related to
this topical issue.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-47
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Santiago Canyon College Project
The Santiago Canyon College environmental document determined that impacts related to the depletion
of ground water supplies were less than significant. Impacts related to violating water quality standards,
alteration of the drainage pattern, storm water run-off, and placement of structures within flood zones was
less than significant with mitigation. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 far the
specific mitigation measures.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
No site or engineering plans have been prepared for the proposed Villa Park Self-Storage that would
provide information on how storm water generated on the project site would be collected and conveyed.
Hydrology and water quality analysis would need to be conducted for this project. The Villa Park Self-
Storage site is elevated approximately 10 feet above the roadways and the groundwater recharge basins.
As a result, structures or housing would not be placed in a flood zone and no impacts would result. The
Villa Park Self-Storage site is located outside the boundaries of the Villa Park and Santiago Dam
inundation boundaries, so no impacts related to dam failure would result.
The potential for violation of water quality standards; depletion of groundwater supplies; alteration of the
site's existing drainage pattern; excessive storm water run-off; and, degradation of water quality remain
potentially significant without mitigation. The Villa Park Self-Storage site is too distant from the Pacific
Ocean to be impacted by a tsunami. The Villa Park Self-Storage site is on a hill and less than significant
impacts with mitigation to landslides would result. The Orange County F1ood Control Basin (aka Bond
Pit) is located southwest of the project site. If a significant earthquake were to occur, the water in this
basin could suddenly oscillate and produce a seiche. However, the Villa Park Self-Storage site is higher
in elevation than the basin and therefore would not be affected by such a condition.
Analysis
Water Quality Standards/Discharge Requirements
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to water quality standards and discharge requirements with PDFs. Analysis indicates that the
proposed project would have no impacts related water quality standards and discharge requirements. Less
than significant impacts were determined for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates and Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion projects. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific
mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration
No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final
EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. Salem Lutheran Church Expansion and Villa Park
Self-Storage have no determination at the time of this writing.
Any impact to water quality standards and discharge requirements for the Villa Park Self-Storage would
be site specific. Although, and the Villa Park Self-Storage could have an impact related to water quality
Page 6-48 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
standards and discharge requirements,the proposed project was determined to have no impacts and would
not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Based on the above data, there would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to water quality standards and discharge
requirements, when viewed in connection with related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental
effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Groundwater Supplies/Recharge
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to groundwater supplies and recharge. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than significant impact related to groundwater
supplies/recharge and no mitigation measures would be required. Less than significant impacts were
identified related to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion and Santiago Canyon College. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General
Plan Amendment to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East Orange General
Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park
Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Any impact to groundwater supplies and recharge far the Villa Park Self-Storage would be site specific.
Although, the and Villa Park Self-Storage project could have an impact related to groundwater supplies
and recharge, the proposed project was determined to have no impacts and would not contribute to a
cumulatively considerable impact. Based on the information provided above there would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to groundwater supplies and recharge,
when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental
effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Alter Stream or River-Erosion
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to alternation of stream or river resulting in erosion. The proposed project, inclusive of Project
Design Features (PDF-HWQ-9) would have a less than significant impact related to drainage pattern of
the site including through the alternation of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site and no mitigation measures would be required.
Based on the information noted above the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion, and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to alternation of
stream or river resulting in erosion. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan
Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. The Villa Park Self-Storage project has no determination at the time of this writing.
Any impact to alternation of stream or river resulting in erosion for the Villa Park Self-Storage project
would be site specific. Although, the Villa Park Self-Storage could have an impact related to alternation
of stream or river resulting in erosion,the proposed project was determined to have no impacts and would
not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Based on the information provided above there
would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to alternation of stream or
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-49
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
river resulting in erosion,when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore,there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Increased Rate of Run-off
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to increase rate or run-off of storm water. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design
Features (PDF's HWQ-1 through HWQ-8) would have a less than significant impact related to alteration
of existing drainage patterns of the project site and no mitigation measures would be required. Analysis
indicates that the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion and proposed project
would have less than significant impacts related to increase rate or run-off of storm water. Mitigation
measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and
Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East Orange
General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to
the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for
specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 far the specific
mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
The increase in run-off volumes would also increase storm water volumes and rates in local and regional
drainage channels. Implementation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for individual
projects would reduce run-off volumes, rates and duration from individual projects, and would prevent
erosion, sedimentation or other hydrologic conditions of concern. Based on this analysis there would be
no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to increase rate or run-off of storm
water, when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Drainage System Capacity/Polluted Run-off
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to drainage system capacity and polluted run-of£ The proposed project, inclusive of Project
Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than significant impact related to
drainage system capacity and pollutant run-off and no mitigation measures would be required. Analysis
indicates that the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and proposed project
would have less than significant impacts related to drainage system capacity and polluted run-off.
Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery,
and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East Orange
General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to
the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for
specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific
mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
The City and County of Orange require new development to provide the needed storm drain infrastructure
systems to serve individual developments and the elimination of existing on-site flood hazards prior to
Page 6-50 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Sanfiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
development. With each new development, the area-wide storm water infrastructure improvements
would be developed and flood hazards would be correspondingly reduced. Therefore, no incremental
impacts related to flood hazards or inadequate storm drainage are expected. Based on this analysis there
would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to drainage system capacity
and polluted run-off, when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Degraded Water Quality
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to degraded water quality. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's
HWQ-9 and HWQ-10) would have a less than significant impact related to degrading water quality and
no mitigation measures would be required. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
project and proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to degraded water quality.
Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan
Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for
the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the
Santiago Canyon College Final EIR,May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-
Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Any impact to alteration of degraded water quality for the Villa Park Self-Storage would be site specific.
Although, and the Villa Park Self-Starage project could have an impact related to alternation degraded
water quality, the proposed project was determined to have no impacts and would not contribute to a
cumulatively considerable impact. Based on the analysis provided above there would be no incremental
or combined effects of the proposed project related to degraded water quality, when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Housing within Flood Hazard
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to housing within a flood hazard. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact
related to housing placement in flood hazard area and no mitigation measures would be required.
Analysis indicates that the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, VPSE, and the proposed project would have no
impacts related to housing within a flood hazard. Less than significant impacts were found for the Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion and Ridgeline Equestrian Estates projects. Mitigation measures were
provided for the East Orange General Plan Amendment and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-51
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
to a less than significant level. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
The City and County of Orange require new development to be located outside of flood hazard areas or
provided appropriate protection. Based on this there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to housing within a flood hazard, when viewed in connection with the effects of
related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Structures within F/ood Hazard
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to structures within a flood hazard. The proposed project would have a less than significant
impact related to structures which would impede or redirect flood flows and no mitigation measures
would be required. The Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Villa Park Self-Storage, and the proposed project do
not propose to place structures with flood plains. Therefore, they would have no impacts related to
structures within a flood hazard. Less than significant impacts were found for the Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion and Ridgeline Equestrian Estates projects. Mitigation measures were provided for the East
Orange General Plan Amendment and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005
for specific mitigation measures.
The City and County of Orange require new development to provide the needed storm drain infrastructure
systems to serve individual developments and the elimination of existing on-site flood hazards prior to
development. While existing flooding conditions will remain, with each new development, the area-wide
storm water infrastructure improvements would be developed and flood hazards would be
correspondingly reduced. Therefore, no incremental impacts related to flood hazards. Based on the
information provided above there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project
related to structures within a flood hazard, when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Levee or Dam Failure
The proposed project,when combined with the related projects,would result in significant impacts related
to levee and dam failure. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, the proposed project impact
(Impact HWQ-1) remains a significant unavoidable impact related to being in the path of inundation were
a dam break to occur. No impact would be anticipated related to the Villa Park Self-Storage project. This
project is not located within the path of inundation were a dam break to occur. Less than significant
impacts were found for the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery projects. Mitigation measures were provided for the East Orange General Plan
Amendment and Santiago Canyon College projects to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Page 6-52 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
The proposed project was determined to have a significant impact (Section 5.9, Hydrology and Water
Quality of this Draft EIR). Therefore, the incremental effects of proposed project related to levee or dam
failure are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects.
Seismic Related Inundation
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to seismic related inundation. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's
HWQ-9) would have a less than significant impact related to construction activities stormwater run-off
and no mitigation measures would be required. Based on the information provided above the Villa Park
Self-Storage projects would have no impacts related to seismic related inundation. Less than significant
impacts were found far the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery, and the proposed project. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange
General Plan Amendment and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific
mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific
mitigation measures.
Seismic related inundation is a site specific impact. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to seismic related inundation, when viewed in
connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which
could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Construction Activities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to construction activities. The proposed project [inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's
HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)] and the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have a less than significant
impact related to post-construction activities stormwater run-off and no mitigation measures would be
required. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan
Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for
the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the
Santiago Canyon College Final EIR,May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-
Starage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Any impact from construction activities for the Villa Park Self-Storage would be site specific. Although,
the Villa Park Self-Storage could have an impact from construction activities, the proposed project was
determined to have no impacts and would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Based on
the information provided above there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed
project related to construction activities, when viewed in connection with the effects related projects.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-53
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Post-Construction Activities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to post-construction activities. The Salem Lutheran Church Expansion and proposed project
[inclusive of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)] would have a less than significant
impact related to post-construction activities stormwater run-off and no mitigation measures would be
required. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan
Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for
the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the
Santiago Canyon College Final EIR,May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-
Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Any impact from post-construction activities far the Villa Park Self-Storage would be site specific.
Although, the Villa Park Self-Storage could have an impact from post-construction activities, the
proposed project was determined to have no impacts and would not contribute to a cumulatively
considerable impact. Based on the information provided above there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to post-construction activities, when viewed in
connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which
could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Discharge Storm Water Pollutants
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to discharge of storm water pollutants. The proposed project, inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)] and Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project would have a less than
significant impact related to stormwater discharge and no mitigation measures would be required.
Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan
Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for
the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the
Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-
Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
The City has developed Model provisions for Water Quality Management Plans for new development.
The provisions identify potential storm water pollutants, such as pathogens, metals, nutrients, pesticides,
sediments, trash and debris, oxygen demanding substances, and oil and grease, that may be expected or
Page 6-54 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
that could potentially be generated by various developments and which may pose hydrologic pollutants of
concern in the region. This information provides a general overview of the range of pollutants typically
found in urban storm water; however, each project would be required to be assessed individually to
accurately determine the likely pollutant contribution.
Construction activities regulated under the NPDES and RWQCB's General Permit for Construction
Activities and the Water Quality Management Plans far individual developments would reduce urban run-
off pollution. New developments that generate pollutants with the potential to degrade storm water
quality would be required to implement on-site retention and infiltration processes. The project and the
related projects would have to comply with these mandates through the appropriate implementation of
both source control and treatment control BMPs for storm water quality protection. Therefore, no
cumulative adverse impacts on hydrology and water quality are expected from the proposed project and
related projects.
Adding the proposed project to the related projects would not result in incremental impacts resulting in
cumulative impacts related to water quality standards, and storm water run-off by the implementation of
NPDES regulations including site design, structural and non-structural BMPs, Project Design Features
(PDFs), and recommended mitigation measures developed in response to future hydrology and water
quality studies and incorporated into future environmental documentation would likely result in less than
significant impacts. Based on the information provided above there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to discharge of storm water pollutants, when viewed in
connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which
could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Discharge Storm Water Pollutants—Affect Beneficial Uses
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to discharge of stortn water pollutants that affect beneficial uses. The proposed project [inclusive
of Project Design Features (PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)] and the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
project have a less than significant impact related to velocity or volume stormwater run-off and no
mitigation measures would be required.. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College
to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange
General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to
the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for
specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific
mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
As shown above, adding the proposed project to the related projects would not result in incremental
impacts resulting in cumulative impacts related to water quality standards, and storm water run-off by the
implementation of NPDES regulations including site design, structural and non-structural BMPs, Project
Design Features (PDFs), and recommended mitigation measures developed in response to future
hydrology and water quality studies and incorporated into future environmental documentation would
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-55
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
likely result in less than significant impacts. As shown above,there would be no incremental or combined
effects of the proposed project related to discharge of storm water pollutants that affect beneficial uses,
when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore,there would be no incremental
effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Change Storm Water Run-ofiF
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to change in storm water run-off. The proposed project [inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF's HWQ-1 through HWQ-8)] and Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project would have a less than
significant impact related to velocity or volume stormwater run-off and no mitigation measures would be
required. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan
Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for
the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the
Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-
Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
As shown above, adding the proposed project to the related projects would not result in incremental
impacts resulting in cumulative impacts related to water quality standards, and storm water run-off by the
implementation of NPDES regulations including site design, structural and non-structural BMPs, Project
Design Features (PDFs), and recommended mitigation measures developed in response to future
hydrology and water quality studies and incorporated into future environmental documentation would
likely result in less than significant impacts. As shown above,there would be no incremental or combined
effects of the proposed project related to change in storm water run-off, when viewed in connection with
the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
/ncrease Erosion—Project Site or Surrounding Areas
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to change in storm water run-of£ The proposed project [inclusive of Project Design Features
(PDF's HWQ-9 and HWQ-10)] and Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project would have a less than
significant impact related to erosion and no mitigation measures would be required. Analysis indicates
that the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts
related to change in storm water run-off. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General
Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College Santiago Canyon College to
reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher
Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation
measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation
measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Page 6-56 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumuiative
As shown above, adding the proposed project to the related projects would not result in incremental
impacts resulting in cumulative impacts related to water quality standards, and storm water run-off by the
implementation of NPDES regulations including site design, structural and non-structural BMPs, Project
Design Features (PDFs), and recommended mitigation measures developed in response to future
hydrology and water quality studies and incorporated into future environmental documentation would
likely result in less than significant impacts. As shown above, there would be no incremental or combined
effects of the proposed project related to change in storm water run-off, when viewed in connection with
the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative hydrology and water quality impacts is provided in Table 6-11, Cumulative
Hydrology and Water Quality Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above the proposed
project and related projects impacts on water quality standards/discharge requirements, groundwater
supplies/recharge, drainage pattern: erosion or siltation, drainage pattern: flooding, drainage system
capacity/polluted run-off, degraded water quality, housing placement: flood hazard area, structure:
impede or redirect flood flow, flooding, seismic related inundation, construction activities: stormwater,
post-construction activities stormwater, stormwater pollutants discharge, stormwater discharge, velocity
or volume stormwater run-off, and erosion there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable with project mitigation and related project mirigation. Related to levee ar dam
failure the proposed project with mitigation was determined to have a significant impact. Therefore, the
incremental effects of proposed project related to levee or dam failure are significant when viewed in
connection with the effects of related projects.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-57
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
seaa 6ui uno��n ao a i ° '� �
b� P S �.S v, � � v, � � �„ v � �, o�Q�'
F- cn cn F-� v� q [-� V p., eo cv o0
��afo�d—uoiso�3 asea��u� �' a a a a z �' a a o � �o
�rov � �
�,.o i �a
v� ci� v� E�-� v� q H V o�.� c �'� W�
�}o-una aa;eM w�o}g a6ue4� a ; ; a ; z a a a � o� �o
�
sas� �' �b o
ei�i aua aa s ue n o � � � � � � � " � ° � 3 ° °'
I � 8 � �H— 3 � II d � � F a � Q a Fa �o � a o
�a�eM w�o�g aB�ey�sia a a a a z a a � £ � �� o
o � � o � �
� �� o � a� o
o� ��m ,..�'`.
s}ue�n��od � � � � � � � � � � £ a.� � � �
H H H .�-1 H � a H � o ° � � 3 � �a o
�a;eM wao�g a6�ey�siQ a a a a a � �, 3� �� o
�� �
A. .D � � N T
~ �'D � d G'O y
� .. y?? y'O y .�.
aa�ennw�o�g � � � � � � �, � � � ;��b . � ..
cn v� v� F- cn [� V °'�o� :'• 0 3 ��
sai�ini}�b►uoi��n��suo�-}sod a a a a a � a a � a a� � � ;, ��;
� " 3 0 >'> �.o.> c,
m o 3 C " = .O o= a
s .� �a >.'«..=° m > p � �
� J3BMU.IJO � � � v' � � � V � `� 3 �w >7Eo � �`° o `°
y 3 �S r� vi vi H v� [-� V v c 4•'c « � > > c, G .. E
� :Sal IAI J UOI JI1J SUO [-� E-� [-� �l F� -P,� �-1 F p�J, ro c.�� � � c c G °^y°m o
3. � b � � .� �l ..a �l �l �l o!�'�c �' c � o � � ii
� T.�N .'C.� V 1�. ,n cGa U C��E G
'' � �G j a'�+ v� � �n� F Gr b0� N �
CI� U � � "��= � c' o� ::
U �-�-1 [-�� .�-1 r�-1 I-� z r�-1 F-� �, 7 `�'��' II � II �G'�,°� ,��,,�p,a
� uoi;epunu� pa;e�aa �iwsiag ,, a a .. � ;,�a �� a� ��� �,a �.€ �
� ,� o ,� �� ax������a��� ��
� � ro�HF�HHH���?�b°Q
� a � � � � � �� V � ��aaaaaa�n��� �zz
� € am�ie� wea�o aana� a a a a a z � a a a ¢
a �o
a w
� � p�ezeH �, � � � � �
3 0°, poo�� uiy;im am;�n�}g a a z a a z z a �
'� � � �
� paezeH poo�� u�y;�nn BuisnoH a a z a a z z a �
o �
�
� � � � � � � � U � �
y,,, o
� �(�i�en�aa;eM apea6aa a a a '� a Q `' a a �
� }}o-una pa}n��od F � � � � Q � � � e
� ��(;iaede� wa�s�(g a6euie�Q -� ; ; a a z a a a �;� N �
a � � 2 � w
� N �
U H r�i� c�i� [`i'- v�'1 � E`n.. CVj � � � .� ro q
� 6uipoo�� :u�a;;ed a6euieaa a a a -� a Q a a � ; � � �,�, �
, ti o w a
�O �Z c", a W
°� °s�,�q W �
� UOI}@;�IS H ci� v� F v� q H U � � W .� a .g
F JO UOISOJ :UJa B aBBUI�J '"'� �"' �"' '� F" z "a F � `
3 �3 d d a a a a ���q w
4 21 � � � � ° � �
a6ae aa H � H H h Q z � a � _.��,� �y
�sai�ddng�a;ennpuno�� a ; �' a �' z a a � " � �o :��°
o � � � N �
'? � •° Q cd c�i �
� fi � � � O Q
s�uawaainbab � � � � � � � � � w � � � N Q
.. [-� v� v� H � q z U �; � � � >, �.
a6aey�s�Q�spaepue�S DM � `' a a '� a z a � � a w � �� �
a w 0. �'csi ti � �
� Q � � S � W s
7 � v � b y y U U �i a
N � � '� � p sC�� o �q 4�
� � � ¢ U p O w � � S U � � N
C � � � � � j, `�' Q' � �� 'J � a � O
> d W °> � ,.�� � v] a�D � a�Q o�' � o U �
'� � p � � �"' � �' U ,� .� > � W � � �n � a G
3 �p p ��_v� � � c�i ''� .� opn�� � �'^ � a w�
� _ ^� o°'n °' � ', y � � '� �� va a�i ° � � �; �; r,: �; �o � d
o W �" G� W W xUv� Wv� U � f� a U � o mU
� � a�
6.0 Cumulative
6.3.10 Land Use and Planning
Introduction
This section will analyze land use impacts related to physically dividing an existing community;
conflicting with applicable land use plans,policy, or regulation; and, conflicring with habitat conservation
plans.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.10, Land Use and Planning, of this Draft EIR, the
proposed project would not divide an established community. With the removal of the proposed project
area from the OPA Plan and the EO General Plan, all land use allocations, improvements, development
standards, lines for the proposed project would be under one specific plan (the Rio Santiago Specific
Plan) as implemented in PDF LUP-4. With the implementation of PDF LUP-4, the proposed project
would amend the City's General Plan to eliminate potential conflicts with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
Therefore, with the City's approval of the amendments to the OPA Plan and the EO General Plan, and the
approval of the Rio Santiago Specific Plan, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation
measures would be required. With the implementation of PDF LUP-4, the proposed project would
change project site zoning designations to eliminate potential conflicts with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. With the
approval of the change in zoning classification, the proposed project would be consistent with the City's
Zoning Code. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures are
required.
The project applicant is not required to incorporate affordable housing in the proposed project (refer to
Section 5.14, Population and Housing of this document for a discussion on affordable housing).
Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an impact related to the City's Affordable Housing
Plan and no mitigation measures are required.
Short-term impacts to local air quality were determined to be potentially significant and unavoidable after
the implementation of Project Design Features (PDFs) and the recommended mitigation measures.
Therefore, the proposed project would result in an inconsistency with the Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP)during the short-term construction period.
The proposed project is consistent with the Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG)
Compass Growth Visioning applicable principles and policies. Therefore, implementation of the proposed
project would not result in significant land use impacts related to relevant SCAG principles and policies
and no mitigation measures would be required.
The development of the proposed project would not conflict with the policies of the Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP). Therefore, no significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures
would be required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-59
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Although the proposed project would result in a loss of access to mineral resources, the majority of the
project site has been mined of most of its economic aggregate deposits and other significant potential
environmental impacts. The remaining deposits with potential economic value are infeasible to mine.
Therefore, the loss of mineral resources would be considered a less than significant impact and no
mitigation measures would be required.
The proposed project will replace all trees on the project site that are removed with a 1:1 ratio. As a
result, the proposed project would not result in a conflict with the City Tree Preservation Ordinance.
Therefare, a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures are required.
There are areas within the project site that deserve conservation planning consideration due to their
significant habitat value, restoration potential, and importance to the assemblage of a regional preserve
system. Survey efforts were directed within all areas of the project site that could contain protected
resources and resources that are important for the preserve assembly. These include Santiago Creek and
its associated riparian habitat, and upland areas north of Santiago Creek that contain marginal Coastal
Sage Scrub habitat. Surveys concluded that other than previously noted in Section 5.10, Biological
Resources, no other portions of the project site contain any resources protected under the Orange County
Central and Coastal subregion NCCP/HCP, including any special status species, natural communities, or
wetlands identified for conservation. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant
impact and no mitigation measures would be required.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, the potential impacts related to the Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates project conflicts with applicable land use plans and habitat conservation plans were determined to
be less than significant without mitigation. These plans included the City General Plan, OPA Plan, City
Master Plan of Trails, and the Orange County Central Section Natural Communities Conservation
Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded that impacts
related to related to conflicts with applicable land use plans and habitat conservation plans were less than
significant with mitigation. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for detailed information related to mitigation measures. Because of the location of
project site is at the edge of the developed area of the City, no division of an established community
would occur.
Holy Sepu/cher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery determined that less than significant
impacts to land use and planning would occur and did not require mitigation measures.
Page 6-60 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Sa/em Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project indicates that the
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion would have a less than significant impact related to this topical issue.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The Santiago Canyon College would introduce additional college-related facilities, including classrooms,
parking, and outdoor sports fields consistent with the Facilities Master Plan. The Santiago Canyon
College project environmental document determined that impacts related to land use and planning were
less than significant and did not require mitigation.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
The proposed Villa Park Self-Storage would develop a self-storage facility for paid subscribers. It is
undetermined if this is development consistent with the existing County of Orange Land Use designation
and zoning classification. As part of permit processing far this proposed land use, the development plan
review processes for new development would analyze a project for conformity to the Orange County
General Plan. Should an amendment to the General Plan be required, completion of that amendment
would result in consistency with the applicable General Plan and Zoning Code, and therefare,be less than
significant. Development on this site would not have the potential to physically divide an existing
community based on its location,use, and size.
Analysis
Divide an Established Community
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to dividing an established community. Analysis in Section 5.10, Land Use and Planning of this
Draft EIR and provided in the individual documents for each of the related proj ects indicates that all
related projects and the proposed project would have no impact related to dividing an established
community.
Based on the information provided above, no impacts were found for the related projects and the
proposed project. Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed
project related to dividing an established community, when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Conflict with Applicable Plans, Policies, or Regulations
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to conflicting with applicable plans, policies or regulations. As referenced above, the analysis
indicates that the related projects and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts
related to conflicting with applicable plans, policies or regulations. Should the Villa Park Self-Storage
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-61
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
project require an amendment to the Orange County General Plan, the approval of the amendment by the
Orange County Board of Supervisors would result in conformance with that Plan.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
conflicting with applicable plans, policies or regulations, when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore,
there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation
measures are required.
Conflict with Conservation Plans
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to conflicting with conservation plans. Based on the above referenced analysis the related projects
and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to conflicting with conservation
plans.
Should the Villa Park Self-Storage project require an amendment to the Orange County General Plan, the
approval of the amendment by the Orange County Board of Supervisors would result in conformance
with that plan. Additionally, each of the related projects is required to be consistent with the Orange
County Central Section Natural Communities Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan
(NCCP/HCP). Therefore, no cumulative considerable conflicts with conservation plan would be
anticipated.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
conflicting with conservation plans, when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation is required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative land use impacts is provided in Table 6-12, Cumulative Land Use and
Planning Impact Summary. Therefore, based on the information presented above related to dividing an
established community; conflicting with applicable plans, policies, or regulations; and, conflicting with
conservation plans and policies, the proposed project does not have a significant potential to have a
cumulatively considerable incremental effect.
Page 6-62 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-12: Cumulative Land Use and Planning Impact Summary
Potential Impacts
Environmental Issue Divide an Conflict with Conflict with
Established Applicabie Plans, Conservation Plans
Communi Polices, or Re ulations
Land Use and Plannin
Rid eline E uestrian Estates NI LTS LTS
East Oran e GPA NI LTS-M LTS-M
Hol Se ulcher Cemeter NI LTS LTS
Salem Lutheran Church Ex ansion LTS LTS LTS
Santia o Can on Colle e NI LTS LTS
Villa Park Self-Stora e NI LTS LTS
Rio Sanria o(Pro osed Pro'ect) NI LTS LTS
Cumulative NI LTCC LTCC
Notes:
1. Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No.1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft E/R,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant withoutproject mitigation
LTS-PM=1ess than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCGPM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG—significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and uoavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(VIST,4).
6.3.11 Mineral Resources
Introduction
This section will analyze mineral resources related to the loss of a known mineral source of value and the
loss of a mineral source delineated on a general plan.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.11, Minerals Resources, of this Draft EIR, the proposed
project would have a less than significant impact to the loss of mineral resources. The proposed project
would have a less than significant impact to the remaining mineral resources that would not be delineated
in the City's General Plan, Specific Plan, or other land use plan.
Related Projects
East Orange GPA Project
The EIR prepared for the East Orange General Plan Amendment determined that the project would not
result in the loss of availability of mineral resources. East Orange Planned Community Area 1, the
majarity of East Orange Planned Community Area 2 (75 to 80 percent), East Orange Planned Community
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-63
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Area 3, and remaining areas are classified as a mineral resource zone designation of MRZ-3, defined as
"areas containing mineral deposits, the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data."
That mineral consists of sand and gravel. Due to the limited quantity of potential deposits (East Orange
General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005), it is expected that mineral extraction
activities in these areas would not be practical. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result
in the loss of any substantial deposit of mineral resources. Additionally, mineral extraction is not
currently taking place and is not expected to take place in the future. Development in these areas would
not impact future extraction plans. Therefore,no impacts would occur.
Other Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Santiago
Canyon College, and Villa Park Self-Storage have no mining activities that have occurred or are
occurring on their project sites. The City General Plan does not identify any of the related sites as a
mineral resource area.
Analysis
Regional
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects would not result in significant impacts
related to regional mineral resources. The analysis provided in the individual documents for each of the
related projects indicates that the related projects have no significant impact on regional mineral
resources. Less than significant impacts were found in Section 5.11, Mineral Resource of this Draft EIR
for the proposed project. Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to regional mineral resources,when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore,there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Local
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to local mineral resources. Based on the analysis referenced above the related projects have no
significant impacts on local mineral resources. Less than significant impacts were found for the proposed
project in Section 5.11, Mineral Resource of this Draft EIR. Consequently, there would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to local mineral resources, when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative mineral resources impacts is provided in Table 6-13, Cumulative Mineral
Resources Impact Summary. Therefore, based on the information presented above related to regional and
Page 6-64 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Sanfiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
local mineral resources the proposed project does not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively
considerable incremental effect.
Table 6-13: Cumulative Mineral Resources Impact Summary
Potential im acts
Environmental issue Re ional Local
Mineral Resources
Rid eline E uestrian Estates NI NI
East Oran e GPA NI NI
Hol Se ulcher Cemetery NI NI
Salem Lutheran Church Ex ansion NI NI
Santia o Can on College NI NI
Villa Park Self-Stora e NI NI
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Pro'ect) LTS LTS
Cumulative LTCC LTCC
Notes:
1. Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,201 1.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR.November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheratt Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon CoUege EIR.May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=1ess than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=1ess than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable witb project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM & RPM = significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project
mitigation
NI—no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(VisTA.
6.3.12 Noise
Introduction
This section will analyze noise impacts related to exposing persons to generation of noise levels in excess
of applicable standards, excessive groundborne vibration, and excessive noise levels, increasing
temporary or permanent ambient noise levels above applicable standards, and exposing persons to noise
from public or private airport-related noise.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.12, Noise, of this Draft EIR, the proposed project would
have a less than significant impact to construction-related noise through compliance with Section
8.24.070 of the Municipal Code. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to short-
term construction-related vibration. The proposed project would have a less than significant vibration
impact from the on-going operations of the proposed project. The proposed project would have a less than
significant stationary noise impact at the nearby sensitive receptors. The proposed project would have a
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-65
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
less than significant transportation noise impact at the nearby sensitive receptors. The proposed project
would have a less than significant combined stationary and transportation noise impact at the nearby
sensitive receptors. Implementation of Mitigation Measures (MM NOI-1)would reduce impacts to future
on-site structures to a less than significant level. Refer to Section 5.12, Noise for details related to
mitigation measures. The proposed project implementation would not have impacts from public or
private airports or airport land use plans.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project would not have
any impacts on excessive groundborne vibration or noise impacts from proximity to airports. With the
implementation of recommended mitigation measures, impacts related to noise levels in excess of
standards and increases in the ambient noise level impacts were reduced below the level of significance.
Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for details related to
specific noise mitigation measures.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded that impacts
related to generation of noise levels above applicable standards and temporary increases in noise levels
above applicable standards were reduced below the level of significance with mitigation. No impacts
related to airport-related noise were identified. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment EIR,
November 2005 for details related to specific noise mitigation measures.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery concluded that no impacts would result
from airport related noise impacts. Impacts related to generation of noise levels above applicable
standards, excessive groundborne vibration and noise levels, increasing temporary or permanent ambient
noise levels above applicable standards were determined to be less than significant without mitigation.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
with mitigation would not expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in
the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. Further, that the
project would not expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration ar groundborne noise
levels. The project with mitigation would not cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Airport-related noise
impacts are not anticipated.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The Santiago Canyon College environmental document concluded that generation of noise levels above
applicable standards and permanent ambient noise levels above applicable standards were less than
significant. Impacts related to temporary increase in ambient noise levels were determined to be less than
Page 6-66 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures. Refer to the Sarrtiago Canyon College Final
EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
The Villa Park Self-Storage has not prepared a noise analysis. As a result,no information exists related to
generation of noise levels above applicable standards, excessive groundborne vibration and noise levels,
and increasing temparary or permanent ambient noise levels above applicable standards exist. Airport-
related noise impacts are not anticipated.
Analysis
Temporary or Periodic Ambient Noise Levels
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to temporary or periodic ambient noise levels. The proposed project would have a less than
significant impact with the inclusion of Mitigation Measure NOI-1, in exposure of persons to or
generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion,
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to
temporary or periodic ambient noise levels. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less
than significant level. Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June,
2011 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon
College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determination at the time of this writing.
The Villa Park Self-Storage could have a significant impact related to temporary or periodic ambient
noise levels.
Construction of the project, when added to the related projects in the area, would result in short-term
noise impacts that would accompany the construction phases of each project. These projects may occur
simultaneously, construction noise impacts would be short-term and incremental; would occur at scattered
locations; and can be mitigated to below a level of significance with controls on construction time periods
and equipment use. These impacts would not be incremental and therefare not cumulatively considerable.
Vehicles coming to and leaving individual developments would lead to increases in noise levels along
roadways throughout the community. This could affect noise-sensitive land uses such as residences,
hospitals, libraries, schools,nursing homes, rehabilitation centers, and other areas with sensitive receptors
that may be present or constructed along these streets. Stationary noise impacts would also occur as they
relate to large crowds and outdoor activities. Noise levels are expected to increase throughout the
community, as new development occurs. The City and County require new development to not generate
noise levels in excess of established standards and residential areas be designed to control noise impacts
from traffic on abutting roadways. Therefare, individual projects would provide noise control to meet
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-67
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
noise standards and individual project mitigation would serve to reduce cumulative noise impacts to less
than significant levels.
Based on the above information, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed
project related to temporary or periodic ambient noise levels, when viewed in connection with the effects
related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Construction Vibration
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to construction vibration. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact related
to ground borne vibration. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery, and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to
construction vibration. Mitigation measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange
General Plan Amendment, and Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates EnviYonmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific
mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November
2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-
Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Although, Vi11a Park Self-Storage could have a significant impact related to construction vibration, as
mentioned above all new developments are generally required to provide noise and vibration studies that
identify future vibration levels that nearby sensitive receptors would be exposed to and the needed
measures to attain acceptable construction vibration levels.
As shown above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
construction vibration, when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Operational Vibration
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to operational vibration. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project viciniry. Analysis indicates that the Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Santiago Canyon
College and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to operational vibration.
The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Although, Villa Park Self-Storage could have a significant impact related to operational vibration, as
mentioned above all new developments are generally required to provide noise and vibration studies that
Page 6-68 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
identify future vibration levels that nearby sensitive receptors would be no incremental effect which could
be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
On-site Outdoor Living Areas
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to on-site outdoor living areas. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to
substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates,
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and Santiago Canyon College would have less than significant impacts related
to on-site outdoor living areas. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan
Amendment and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East
Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing; however,the project does not
propose any on-site outdoor living areas so no impact could occur.
Related projects and the proposed project would implement measures to prevent noise impacts on any
proposed noise-sensitive land use. Compliance with these regulations would reduce the exposure of
existing and future land uses to excessive and unwanted noise levels.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to on-
site living areas, when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other related
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Off-site Outdoor Living Areas
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to off-site outdoor living areas. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact
related to permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. Analysis indicates that the
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and
Santiago Canyon College would have less than significant impacts related to off-site outdoor living areas.
Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment and the proposed project to
reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mirigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determination at the time of this writing.
Although, the Villa Park Self-Storage could have a significant impact related to off-site outdoor living, all
new developments are generally required to provide noise studies that identify future noise levels that the
development would expose off-site sensitive receptors to, along with features to prevent the generation of
excessive noise. Therefore, related projects and the proposed project would implement measures to
reduce noise impacts on adjacent land uses, as well as measures to prevent noise impacts on any proposed
noise-sensitive land use. Compliance with these regulations would reduce the exposure of existing and
future land uses to excessive and unwanted noise levels.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-69
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to off-
site outdoor living areas when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental
effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Airports
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to airports and airport land use plans. The proposed project would have a less than significant
impact related to noise from public airports. The proposed project would have a less than significant
impact related to noise from private airports. Based on the data provided above the related projects and
the proposed project would have no impact related to airports or airport land use plans or private airstrips.
The related projects are generally related a distance from these facilities. The related projects are
generally located a distance from any public or private airport. Although noise from aircraft pass bys are
noticeable in the vicinity of the related projects, due to the height of the aircraft, noise levels at each
project site would not be significantly influenced by aircraft noise. Based on the information provided
above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to airports or
airport land use plans when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative noise impacts is provided in Table 6-14, Cumulative Noise Impact
Summary. Based on the information presented above related to construction vibration, operational
vibration, ambient noise levels, on-site outdoor living areas, off-site outdoor living area, and airports or
airport land use plans, the project does not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively
considerable incremental effect upon cumulative noise change impacts. Implementation of Mitigation
Measures (MM NOI-1)would reduce impacts to iuture on-site structures to a less than significant level.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
cumulative mitigation would be required.
Page 6-70 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-14: Cumulative Noise Impact Summary
Potential Impacts
t� y C � y � 'a
O C
O > � v > �
�d J � i J J � �
a G� ; 'C � O N .� i tlJ
Environmental Issue `o �' c � �' �° � �; a o
�,+Z � C Z 3 Q C p Q.
� C � '+0�+ = 0 ,+d�' F; Q
O G! �,�-,, 10 G1 w y �!
� � = Q, � u� � W
� Q U 0 Q o O
Noise
Rid eline E uestrian Estates LTS-M LTS-M LTS LTS LTS LTS NI
East Oran e GPA LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M NI
Hol Se ulcher Cemeter LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI
Salem Lutheran Church
Ex ansion4 LTS-M LTS LTS LTS-M LTS-M LTS-M NI
Santia o Can on Colle e LTS-M LTS-M LTS LTS LTS LTS NI
Villa Park Self-Stora e NDM NDM NDM NDM NDM NDM NI
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Project) LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS-M LTS-M NI
Cumulative LTCC LTCC LTCC LTCC LTCC LTCC NI
Notes:
L Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,2011.
2. Ea.ct Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR.November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No.1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Luthe�•an Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR.May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=Iess than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM—no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(ViSTA)and Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Draft EIR.
6.3.13 Population and Housing
Introduction
This section will analyze population and housing impacts related to population growth; to the inducement
of substantial population growth; and, to the displacement of substantial numbers of people or substantial
numbers of housing units.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, of this Draft EIR, the
proposed project would have a less than significant impact on population growth in the City; the
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-71
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing; and, the displacement of substantial numbers of
people.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates concluded that no impacts
related to inducing substantial growth and displacement of people and housing would occur. The existing
housing unit located on the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates site, which is used as the on-site caretaker
residence, would be removed resulting in the displacement of approximately five persons. Moreover, the
introduction of the proposed 39 housing units to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates site was deemed to be a
beneficial impact by providing additional housing opportunities thereby assisting the City in meeting its
Above Moderate Income production goal related to Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
East Orange GPA Project
Population and housing were examined in the initial study prepared for East Orange General Plan project.
At that time, the City found that the projected population increase was consistent with long-term growth
projections far the study area and that the increase in housing was consistent with housing projections.
No mitigation measures are required. The environmental documentation did not identify any housing or
population displacement. Therefore,no impacts to population and housing would be anticipated.
Holy Sepulcher Cemefery Project
The Holy Sepulcher Cemetery project does not propose any housing units. The environmental document
prepared for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery determined that no impacts were related to inducing
substantial growth and displacing a substantial number of people. Therefore, impact related displacing a
substantial number of housing was determined to be less than significant and did not require mitigation
measures. Therefore,no impacts to population and housing would be anticipated.
Sa/em Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
would have less than significant impacts related to this topical issue.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The Santiago Canyon College project would not be anticipated to forester or encourage population
growth. The proposed facility would anticipate to be utilized by persons living or residing in a relatively
close vicinity to the project. The environmental document prepared for the Santiago Canyon College did
not anticipated that the project would displace any housing units and does not propose housing units as
part of the project. Therefore;no impacts to population and housing would be anticipated.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Projecf
The proposed Villa Park Self-Storage would not eliminate any existing housing units and does not
propose any housing stock. However, the facility may include an on-site manager residence that would
be equivalent to adding a single housing unit. Implementation of this proposed project would not
Page 6-72 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
eliminate any housing units or population and represents only a minor increase in population. Therefore,
no impacts to population and housing would be anticipated.
Analysis
Population Growth
Based on the data provided in the environmental documents prepared for the related projects, the
proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts related
to population growth. Analysis indicates that the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery the Santiago Canyon College
would have no impacts related to population growth. Less than significant impacts were found for Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Villa
Park Self-Storage, and proposed project.
The East Orange General Plan Amendment, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, and Villa Park Self-Storage
projects would result in a combined total of 4,040 housing units with an estimated population increase of
12,564 persons using 3.11 persons per housing unit (Table H-ll of the 2010 Housing Element). Adding
the proposed 365 housing units to the related projects would result in a total of approximately 4,405
housing units with an estimated population increase of approximately 13,995 to 13,261persons [i.e.,
related projects population estimated at 4,040 time rate of 3.11 = 12,564 persons; and, propose project
365 units=697 persons(Section 5.13 Population and Housing); or 12,564 plus 697= 13,261 persons].
The related and proposed project's population growth would be approximately nine-percent growth in
population and would be within current population projections for the City based on Figure H-I, City of
Orange Population Growth Forecast, 1980-2030 in the City's 2010 Housing Element. The City's 2010
Housing Element states that according the US Census and the Department of Finance, the City
experienced an eight percent increase in population between 2000 - 2007. The Center for Demographic
Research at the California State University at Fullerton forecasts a gradual population growth rate over in
the City until 2030 with an estimated population of 160,000 in 2030.
The proposed project's less than one-percent growth in population would be within current population
projections for the City based on Figure H-1, City of Orange Population Growth Forecast, 1980-2030 in
the City's 2010 Housing Element. Additionally, while the proposed project and related projects would
provide far a concentration of future City population in this area of the City; neither the City's Housing
Element nor Housing Element EIR identified this increase in concentration as significant. Therefore, the
proposed project and related projects would have a less than significant impact related to concentrations
of population growth in the City.
Therefore, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
population growth when viewed in connection with the related projects. Therefore, there would be no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
City of Orange-Draff EIR—May 2013 Page 6-73
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Housing Displacement/Replacemenf Housing
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to housing displacement or replacement housing. Analysis indicates that the Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Santiago Canyon College, and Villa Park Self-Storage
would have no impacts related to housing displacement or replacement housing. Less than significant
impacts are implied for Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and Salem Lutheran Church Expansion and the
proposed project.
The elimination of the single housing unit associated with the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project when
combined with the elimination of the single housing on the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project
would result in eliminating two housing units with a combined estimated total of eight persons. The loss
of two residential units and potential residents is not considered cumulatively considerable. Therefore, no
impacts to displacing a substantial number of housing units or persons would result. There would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to housing displacement or replacement
housing when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no
incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Population Displacement/Replacement Housing
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to population displacement or replacement housing. Analysis indicates that the Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Santiago Canyon College, Villa Park Self-
Storage, and the proposed project would have no impacts related to population displacement or
replacement housing. Less than significant impacts were found for Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and implied
for Salem Lutheran Church Expansion.
The elimination of the single housing unit associated with the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project when
combined with the elimination of the single housing on the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion project site
would result in eliminating two (2) housing units with a combined estimated total of eight (8) persons.
The loss of two residential units and potential residents is not considered cumulatively considerable.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
population displacement or replacement housing when viewed in connection with the related projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative population and growth impacts is provided in Table 6-15, Cumulative
Population and Housing Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above related to
population growth, housing displacement or replacement housing, and population displacement ar
replacement housing. The proposed project does not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively
considerable incremental effect upon cumulative population and housing change impacts. Therefare, the
proposed project would not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental
effect upon cumulative population and housing.
Page 6-74 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-15: Cumulative Population and Housing Impact Summary
Potentiallm acts
Environmental Issue Population
Population Housing Displacement/ Displacement/
Growth Replacement Housing Replacement
Housing
Po ulation and Housin
Rid eline E uestrian Estates LTS NI NI
East Oran e GPA LTS NI NI
Hol Se ulcher Cemetery NI LTS LTS
Salem Lutheran Church Ex ansion LTS LTS LTS
Santia o Can on Colle e Nl NI NI
Villa Park Self-Stora e LTS NI NI
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Project) LTS LTS LTS
Cumulative LTCC NI NI
Notes:
!. Ridgeline Equestrlan Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplementul EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mftigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,May 2008.
4. Sa[em Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
S. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=1ess than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=1ess than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Souroe: Vista Community Planners(VIST.4)and Ridgelrne Equestrian Estates Draft EIR.
6.3.14 Public Services
Introduction
This section will analyze public service impacts related to the provision of new or altered public facilities
that would provide police protection, fire protection, schools,parks, and other governmental services.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.14, Public Services of this Draft EIR, with the inclusion
of Project Design Features (PDFs) the proposed project would have a less than significant impact
regarding provisions of fire protection and emergency medical services; police protection services;
schools and school facilities; and, other governmental services. The proposed project would have less
than significant impacts related to parks.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-75
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,
June, 2011,the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project would have minimal impacts on the provision of new
or altered government services. Short-term impacts were identified related to providing police and fire
access during the construction period but were reduced below the level of significance with the
implementation of recommended mitigation measures. Refer to the Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates
Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures. These temporary, short-
term impacts related primarily to the configuration of the project site in combination with the related
projects would not result in cumulative short-term impacts. The Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project
would have less than cumulatively considerable impacts without mitigation related to schools and parks.
East Orange GPA Project
Based on the information provided in the East Orange General Plan Amendment EIR the project does not
directly impact public facilities. However, the scope of the development would require the alteration of
governmental services. The East Orange General Plan Amendment project EIR concluded that impacts
related to the provision of fire and police protection services, schools and parks, and compliance with
solid waste policies were rendered less than significant with mitigation. Refer to the East Orange
General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery determined that no impacts were related
to schools,parks, and other governmental facilities. Impacts to the provision of police and fire protection
services were less than significant without mitigation.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
would have a less than significant impact related to this topical issue. Santiago Canyon College Project
The Santiago Canyon College environmental document concluded that impacts related to the provision of
police and fire protection services were less than significant and did not require mitigation. No impacts to
schools,parks, or other governmental facilities were identified.
Villa Park Self-Storage Project
The Villa Park Self-Storage would require police and fire protection services beyond the existing site
conditions. Due to the itinerant nature of this land use by the subscribers, this increased demand over the
existing conditions is anticipated to be minimal. The Villa Park Self-Storage site manager residence and
storage units would be improved with fire sprinklers. No impacts on schools, parks, or other
governmental facilities would be anticipated.
Page 6-76 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Analysis
Fire Protection
Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion and Santiago Canyon College projects
would have less than significant impacts related to population fire protection and emergency services.
Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates, and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East
Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific
mitigation measures. Salem Lutheran Church Expansion and Villa Park Self-Storage have no
determination at the time of this writing. The proposed project, when combined with the related projects,
would not result in significant impacts related to fire protection and emergency services.
The Villa Park Self-Storage would be required to comply with pertinent provisions of the Uniform Fire
Code to prevent the creation of fire hazards, to promote fire safety, and to facilitate emergency response.
Regular review of projects coming on-line would ensure that no fire safety hazards are created by new
development; that fire prevention measures are incorporated into new developments; and that fire
emergency response is facilitated by provision of adequate access and fire alarm systems. The proposed
project and all related projects would be subject to development fees, which help finance public facilities,
such as police services, fire services, and library facilities. Payment of these development fees and yearly
evaluation of fire service provision are expected to provide the necessary fire services to the area and
prevent any significant cumulative adverse impacts on fire protection services. Implementation of these
measures would avoid potential significant cumulative adverse impacts on fire protection services.
Combining the proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental increase in the
need for fire protection services. Although adding the proposed project to the related projects would
result in an incremental increase to fire protection services, no cumulatively considerable impacts would
result. Based on the information provided above related to the payment of all applicable development
fees by the proposed project and related projects, there would be no incremental or combined effects of
the proposed project related to fire protection and emergency services when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Police Protection
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to police services. Analysis indicates that the Santiago Canyon College would have less than
significant impacts related to police services and emergency services. Mitigation measures were provided
for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and
the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determination at the time of this writing. Refer to the Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates Environmental Impact
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-77
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Report, June, 2011 far the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan
Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
The City Police Department and Orange County Sheriff's Department would require additional staff and
equipment to serve the increase in population associated with future developments. Both agencies review
their police services annually to determine the appropriate level of service and budget to provide for
adequate police services. Therefore, impacts of the related developments are expected to be addressed
through City policies and programs. Evaluation of key service indicators would allow continual
monitoring of the adequacy of police protection services and identify appropriate funding levels and
needed resources. Individual developments are subject to development fees, which help finance public
facilities, including police services, fire services, and library facilities. Payment of these development
fees provides the funding for police services. Annual evaluation of police services would ensure that
acceptable service levels for public safety are maintained. This evaluation and funding are expected to
provide the necessary police services to the project area and prevent any significant cumulative adverse
impacts on the existing level of police protection and law enforcement services.
Combining the proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental increase in the
need for police protection services. Although adding the proposed project to the related projects would
result in an incremental increase to police protection services, no cumulatively considerable impacts
would result. This is because the proposed project and all related projects would be subject to
development fees, which would help finance any needed police services. Consequently, there would be
no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to police project services when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Schoo/s
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to increase in schools. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Santiago Canyon
College, Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, and Villa Park Self-Storage would have no impacts related
to increase in schooL Less than significant impacts were found for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates and the
proposed project.
Related to the proposed project, Planning Areas A and B will not generate school age children. The
Planning Area C (age-qualified) facility would not directly result in the generation of school age children.
The proposed project 130 single-family homes in Planning Area D would generate school age children
and would result in an increase demand for school services and facilities. With the addition of 130
single-family residents, the development of the proposed project would result in an incremental increase
in the number of residential units and school age residents in the Orange Unified School District (OUSD).
Based on the 130 additional units generated by the proposed project and a student generation rates listed
in Table 5.14-5, Student Generation Rates a total of approximately 68 new K-12 students would be added
to the OUSD. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment to reduce
Page 6-78 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
impacts to a less than significant level (East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005). Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 20ll for
the specific mitigation measures.
Although, combining the proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental
increase in the need for schools, no cumulatively considerable impacts would result. The mandatory
obligations of Government Code Section 65995 would offset demands for educational facilities. As
permitted by State law, school districts assess school impact fees to help finance needed facilities and
services. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant would be required to pay school
fees. Therefore, with the payment of the required school fees in accordance with the provisions of the
State law, the development of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on school
facilities and no mitigation measures would be required. Consequently,there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to increase in schools when viewed in connection with
the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Parks
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to parks. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Santiago Canyon College, Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, Villa Park Self-Storage, and the proposed projects would have less than
significant impacts related to parks. Less than significant impacts were found for Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates.
The proposed project includes recreational components and on-site facilities and trails. The on-site
recreational component would provide increased recreational opportunities to residents in the project site
vicinity and the proposed project on-site residential component. As a result, the proposed project does
not have the potential to result in the need for new ar physically altered government facilities related to
parks. Therefore a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be
required. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment to reduce
impacts to a less than significant level (East Orange General Plan Amerrdment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005). Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November
2005 for specific mitigation measures. Based on information provided above, combining the proposed
project with the related projects would not result in an incremental increase in the need for parks and no
cumulatively considerable impacts would result.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to parks
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-79
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Other Facilities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to other governmental facilities. Analysis indicates that the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery and
Santiago Canyon College and the proposed projects would have no impacts related to other facilities.
Less than significant impacts were found for Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates, and the proposed project. Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan
Amendment to reduce impacts to a less than significant level (East Orange General Plan Amendment
Supplemental EIR, November 2005). Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental
EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination
at the time of this writing.
The proposed project would increase demand for other public services such as the City Hall complex and
library services. The increase in demand at the City Hall complex would include staff hours for such
items as plan checks and building inspections. The incremental increase in demand for other
governmental services would be anticipated to be met by existing facilities and off-set by fees such as
plan check fees that the City requires and also by the General Fund.
The demand for library services would not be anticipated to be high and would not result in the need to
alter the governmental provision of library services. It is anticipated that limited library like facilities
would be included in the age-restricted residential uses. Additionally, according the City's, General Plan
2010 Program EIR, Page 5.12-24, the Orange Public Library Facilities Master Plan recommends future
expansions to the El Modena library, as well as construction of a new (fourth) branch library in the
Santiago Hills area of Orange. Pursuant to development already approved for East Orange, a new library
site has been reserved. Based on projections of future needs to 2020, the El Modena Branch is expected
to serve 28,900 people (an increase of 1,400 residents) and the East Orange Branch is anticipated to serve
33,280 people. In addition, other public services including the City Hall complex and libraries would
continue to be provided from existing facilities in the City. The proposed project would pay applicable
development fees to off-set any increase demand. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur
and no mitigation measures would be required.
Combining the proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental increase in the
need for other governmental facilities. Based on the information provided above, although adding the
proposed project to the related projects would result in an incremental increase to other facilities, no
cumulatively considerable impacts would result. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to other facilities when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative public services impacts is provided in Table 6-16, Cumulative Public
Services Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above related to fire protection and other
Page 6-80 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
emergency services, police protection services, parks, and other governmental faculties, the project does
not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon cumulative
public services change impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a significant potential to
have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon public facilities.
Table 6-16: Cumulative Public Services Impact Summary
Potential Im acts
Environmentallssue Fire Police Schools Parks Other
Protection Protection Facilities
Public Services
Ridgeline Equestrian LTC-M LTC-M LTC LTC LTC
Estates�
East Oran e GPA LTC-M LTC-M LTGM LTGM LTGM
Hol Se ulcher Cemete LTC-M LTC-M NI NI NI
Salem Lutheran Church LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS
Ex ansion
Santia o Can on Colle e LTC LTC NI NI NI
Villa Park Self-Storage NDM NDM NI NI NDM
Rio Sant�iago(Proposed LTC LTC LTC NI LTC
Pro'ect)
Cumulative LTCC-RPM LTCC-RPM LTC-RPM LTC-RPM LTC-RPM
Notes:
l. Ridgeline Equestriatt Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,20ll.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supp]emental EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declarution No. 1768-06,May 2008.
4. Sa/em Lutheran Church and School Specifrc Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
5. Santiago Canyon College EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=1ess than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=1ess than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=1ess than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM & RPM = significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project
mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(VIST,4)and Ridgeline Eguestrian Estates Draft EIR.
6.3.15 Recreation
Introduction
This section will analyze recreation impacts are related to impacts from increased use of neighborhood
and regional facilities and the construction ar expansion of recreational facilities.
Proposed Project
The proposed project would include an age-qualified community and a single-family residential
community. PDF REG2, PDF REC-4, and PDF REGS, provide recreational and open space
opportunities to the proposed project age-qualified and single-family residential communities. Based on
City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013 Page 6-81
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
the information provided in Section 5.15, Recreation, of this Draft EIR, proposed project would have a
less than significant impact related to existing neighborhood and/or regional parks or other recreational
facilities. Based on Orange Municipal Code Chapter 16.60 and the population estimates provided in
Section 5.13, Population and Housing of this Draft EIR, the proposed project requires the dedication of
2.188 acres of park land. The City's Municipal Code requires that the proposed project comply with one
of the following:
• Payment of City Park Fees(Quimby fees);
• Dedication of land to the City that meets City requirements; or
• A combination of fees and land dedication.
The project applicant is requesting park credit for the donation of Planning Area A and park facilities,
including recreational trails associated with Planning Areas A, B, C, and D, as described in PDF REC 1 to
PDF REC -8 and above. The applicant is requesting that these credits off-set any Park and Recreational
Facilities Development Impact Fees required for the project; and, that any surplus be held ("advanced")
by the project applicant for future use. Please refer to Section 5.15, Recreation, Table 5.15-4, Project
Applicant Park Land Dedication Offer vs. City Standards, for a comparison of City Staff and project
applicant's park credit opinion. Final determination of credits is under the authority of the City Council.
Should the City Council determine that additional fees are required, the proposed project would be
required to pay these fees prior to the City and as a condition precedent to the issuance of a building
permit. Therefore, with the payment of City Park Fees and/or donation of Planning Area A and park
facilities associated with Planning Areas A, B, C, and D, a less than significant impact is anticipated
related to the proposed project and no mitigation measures would be required.
The proposed project provides on-site privately owned recreational facilities open to the public and public
trails. The impacts of the proposed project's private recreational facilities and public trails have been
analyzed in detail within each environmental topic. Please refer to a specific section for specific topical
impacts from recreational facilities (i.e., noise).
PDF REC-1 through PDF REGS require the proposed project to include open space and parks that reduce
the projects impact on existing recreational facilities and the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities and provide a link for recreation uses along Santiago Creek. Based on this the proposed projects
impacts on open space/parks would be anticipated to have a less than significant impact and no mitigation
measures would be required.
PDF REG6 through PDF REC-8 require the implementation of design features for the proposed project
that include trails that reduce, but do not eliminate, the projects impact on existing recreational facilities
and the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. The proposed project provides for the
implementation of all planned recreational trails. The existing trail to the northeast of the project site
within the Santiago Oaks Regional Park is presently not paved. Future trail locations are general;
however, maybe located on the project site including a potential connection across Santiago Creek. The
Page 6-82 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
proposed project would not preclude the implementation of the future trails. Less than significant impacts
are anticipated as the proposed multi-purpose recreational trail will be developed in accordance with
County Standards. PDF REC-6 through PDF REG8 reduce this potential impact to a less than significant
level by the provision of 1.62 miles of on-site regional and multi-purpose trails. Therefore, based on the
information presented above, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates would not have impacts
related to existing neighborhood or regional parks. Impacts related to construction or expansion of
recreational facilities was deemed less than significant and did not require any mitigation measures.
Mareover, the addition of trails on the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates site was deemed to be a beneficial
impact.
East Orange GPA Project
Based on the information in the East Orange General Plan Amendment EIR the project would have a less
than significant impacts related to existing neighborhood or regional parks. Impacts related to the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities was rendered less than significant with the
incorporation of mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental
EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery concluded that impacts related to existing
neighborhood or regional parks would be less than significant and did not require mitigation. No impacts
were identified related to the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The Salem Lutheran Church Expansion does not propose any trails or additional recreational facilities.
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
would have less than significant impacts related to this topical issue.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The proposed on-site recreational uses consisting of outdoor sports fields are intended for the College and
would not generate off-site usage of trails or other recreational facilities. The Santiago Canyon College
environmental document concluded that impacts related to existing neighborhood or regional parks were
less than significant and did not require mitigation measures. No impacts were identified related to the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
Villa Park Self-Storage Project
The Villa Park Self-Storage does not propose recreational facilities or trails. No determination has been
made related to the Villa Park Self-Storage project related to potential impacts to existing neighborhood
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-83
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
and/or regional parks or other recreational facilities or the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities. The proposed land use of self-storage would not generally be considered as one that would
significantly impact recreational resources. Therefore, no impacts related to recreational uses would
result from the Villa Park Self-Storage project.
Analysis
Neighborhood or Regional Parks/Other Recreational Facilities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to neighborhood and regional parks and other recreational facilities. Analysis indicates that
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Villa Park Self-Storage and the proposed projects would have no impacts
related to neighborhood and regional parks and other recreational facilities. Less than significant impacts
were found for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Salem Lutheran
Church Expansion and Santiago Canyon College. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at
the time of this writing.
The proposed project and related projects may potentially result in an incremental increase in the demand
for recreational facilities. However, based on the information presented above and in Section 5.15,
Recreation, the proposed project would be anticipated to have a less than significant impact related to
recreational facilities and no mitigation measures would be required.
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
neighborhood and regional parks and other recreational facilities when viewed in connection with the
effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Construction or Expansion of Recreationa/Facilities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher
Cemetery and Santiago Canyon College would have no impacts related to construction or expansion of
recreational facilities. Less than significant impacts were found for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East
Orange General Plan Amendment, and the proposed project. While the Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion and Villa Park Self-Storage have no determination at the time of this writing,based on the data
presented above a less than significant impact would be anticipated.
Combining the proposed project with the related projects may result in an incremental increase in the
construction of new recreational facilities that have the potential to result in potentially significant
cumulative impacts related to area parks and recreational facilities. The proposed project includes the
development of recreational facilities. Environmental documentation that would be prepared far the Villa
Park Self-Storage project would evaluate potential impacts and recommend mitigation measures, as
necessary. In addition, payment of park impact fees in conformance with the Quimby Act would off-set
any impacts to recreational facilities that would be identified.
Page 6-84 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
construction or expansion of recreational facilities when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there
would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are
required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative recreation impacts is provided in Table 6-17, Cumulative Recreation
Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above related to neighborhood and regional parks
and other recreational facilities, and to construction or expansion of recreational facilities, the project
does not have a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon
cumulative recreational change impacts.
Table 6-17: Cumulative Recreation Impact Summary
Potential Im acts
Environmental Issue Neighborhood or Regional Construction or Expansion
Parks/Other Recreational af Recreational Facilities
Facilities
Recreation
Rid eline E uestrian Estates NI LTS
East Oran e GPA LTS LTS-M
Hol Se ulcher Cemetery LTS NI
Salem Lutheran Church Ex ansion LTS LTS
Santia o Can on College LTS NI
Villa Park Self-Stora e NDM NDM
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Project) LTS LTS
Cumulative LTCC LTCC-RPM
Notes:
1. Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report,June,2011.
1. East Orange General Pdan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Ezpansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and School Specific Plan Draft EIR,February 2012.
S. Santiago Canyon Codlege EIR,May 2005.
6. Rio Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=less than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCGPM & RPM = significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project
mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Communiry Planners(l�tSTA).
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-85
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
6.3.16 Transportation and Traffic
Introduction
This section will analyze transportation and traffic addresses the impacts of the project on roadway and
intersection capacity and level of service, as well as road hazards, emergency access and plans for
alternative transportation.
P�oposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.15, Transportation and Tra�c, of this Draft EIR, the
proposed project with mitigation measures would have a significant transportation and traffic impact.
Specifically, with the implementation of PDF TRA-1, TRA-2, TRA-3, TRA-5, TRA-6, LUP-1, REC-1,
REC-6 and REC-7 and MM TRA — 1, payment of TSIP fees, and the project applicant's construction of
roadway segments and intersections in the City that would be impacted by the project in would be
reduced to a less than significant leveL Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-3, intersections far
Opening Year 2017 plus Project (Impact TRA-2) would be reduced to a less than significant level. With
the inclusion of Mitigation Measure TRA-�, roadway segments for Opening Year 2017 plus Project
(Impact TRA-3) would be reduced to a less than significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measure
TRA-5, intersections for General Plan 2030 plus Project (Impact TRA-4) would be reduced to a less than
significant level. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure TRA— 6, roadway segments for General Plan
2030 plus Project (Impact TRA-5) would be reduced to a less than significant level. However, due to the
fact that these improvements are not presently included in the City's CIP and may not be constructed
when needed to mitigate the impact; this impact is considered significant and unavoidable. The
construction of the mitigation measure provided above will not create additional impacts. All of the
mitigation measures will be constructed within rights-of-way as provided by the City's Circulation
Element.
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to air traffic and no mitigation measures
would be required. The proposed project with the Project Design Features (PDF TRA-1 through TRA-8,
TRA-11, TRA-12, and TRA-15) would have a less than significant impact to hazards for transportation
and traffic and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project with the Project Design
Features (PDF TRA-1 through TRA-8, TRA-11, and TRA-12) would have a less than significant impact
to emergency access and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project with the
Project Design Features (PDF TRA-10, TRA-11, TRA-12, and TRA-14, and PDF LUP and PDF REC)
would have a less than significant impact to alternative transportation and no mitigation measures would
be required.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates would not have any impacts
related to level of service standards on Congestion Management Plan intersections, changes in air traffic
patterns, inadequate emergency access, or conflicts with alternative transportation plans. Increases in
Page 6-86 City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
traffic were determined to be less than significant and did not require mitigation due to the net reduction
in vehicle trips after project implementation. In addition, hazards related to equestrian and pedestrian
movements in relation to vehicle trips were determined to be less than significant and do not require
mitigation. The traffic study prepared for the project analyzed cumulative traffic for the project for Year
2012 and Year 2025 and concluded that potentially significant impacts were less than significant and did
not require mitigation.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded that impacts from
increased traffic and exceeding established levels of service were reduced below the level of significance
with mitigation measures. The East Orange General Plan Amendment project mitigation measures are as
outlined in the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005. Refer to the
Section 5.16, Transportation and Traffzc, related to specific utilization of the East Orange General Plan
Amendment mitigation. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,
November 2005 for specific mitigation measures.
No impacts were identified with road hazards,emergency access and plans for alternative transportation.
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document for the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery did not identify any impacts associated
with exceeding an established level of service, change in air traffic patterns, inadequate emergency
access, or inadequate parking capacity. Impacts associated with an increase in traffic and alternative
transportation were determined to be less than significant. Impacts associated with a design feature
related to the relocation of the signalized trail crossing were determined to be less than significant with
the incorporation of mitigation measures (Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008). Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific mitigation measures.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
would have less than significant impacts related to this topical issue.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The environmental document prepared for the Santiago Canyon College concluded that impacts were less
than significant without mitigation. The increase in traffic related to the existing traffic load required
mitigation(Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005). Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final
EIR, May 2005for specific mitigation measures. No impacts are anticipated related to changes in air
traffic patterns, and alternative transportation systems.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
The Villa Park Self-Storage would generate traffic from paid users accessing their individual storage
units. Vehicular access to the site would be gained from the existing fire station adjacent to the eastern
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-87
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
site perimeter. On-site vehicular parking would be provided. The Villa Park Self-Storage would generate
traffic primarily on weekends during off-peak hours. Less than significant impacts to roadway and
intersection capacity and level of service are anticipated. No impacts to air traffic patterns and alternative
transportation plans are expected. However, a project level analysis would need to be conducted.
Analysis
/ncrease Traffic
The proposed project,when combined with the related projects,would result in significant impacts related
to increased traffic. The proposed project with mitigation measures would have a significant
transportation and traffic impact. Specifically, with the implementation of PDF TRA-1, TRA-2, TRA-3,
TRA-5, TRA-6, LUP-1, REG1, REC-6 and REC-7 and MM TRA — 1, payment of TSIP fees, and the
project applicant's construction of roadway segments and intersections in the City that would be impacted
by the project in would be reduced to a less than significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measure
TRA-3, intersections for Opening Year 2017 plus Project(Impact TRA-2)would be reduced to a less than
significant level. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure TRA-4,roadway segments for Opening Year
2017 plus Project (Impact TRA-3) would be reduced to a less than significant level. Implementation of
Mitigation Measure TRA-5, intersections for General Plan 2030 plus Project (Impact TRA-4) would be
reduced to a less than significant level. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measure TRA— 6, roadway
segments for General Plan 2030 plus Project (Impact TRA-5) would be reduced to a less than significant
level. However, due to the fact that these improvements are not presently included in the City's CIP and
may not be constructed when needed to mitigate the impact; this impact is considered significant and
unavoidable. The construction of the mitigation measure provided above will not create additional
impacts. All of the mitigation measures will be constructed within rights-of-way as provided by the
City's Circulation Element.. Analysis indicates that Holy Sepulcher Cemetery would not have impacts
related to increase traffic. Less than significant impacts were found from Ridgeline Equestrian Estates.
Mitigation measures were provided for East Orange General Plan Amendment, Santiago Canyon College,
and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the East Orange
General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to
the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park
Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
Combining the proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental increase in
traffic, a cumulatively considerable impacts would result. The Traffic Study summarized in Section 5.15,
Transportation and Traffic, of this Draft EIR, included all related projects in the analysis of traffic
impacts. There would be an incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to increased
traffic when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, there would be an incremental effect which could
be cumulatively considerable and no additional mitigation measures are required.
Page 6-88 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Congestion Management Plan
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to the congestion management plan. The proposed project with mitigation measures would have
less than significant transportarion and traffic impacts. Specifically, with the inclusion of Mitigation
Measure TRA— 1 and TRA-2, intersections for 2017 with Project (Impact TRA-1) would be reduced to a
less than significant level. As noted above, with the inclusion of Mitigation Measure TRA-3, roadway
segments (Impact TRA-2) impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. With the inclusion of
Mitigation Measure TRA— 4, impacts to intersections in 2030 with Project (Impact TRA-3) would be
reduced to a less than significant level. Analysis indicates that Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, Santiago Canyon College, and the proposed project would have less than
significant impacts related to congestion management plan. Mitigation measures were provided for East
Orange General Plan Amendment and Holy Sepulcher Cemetery to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005
for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 1768-06,May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determination at the time of this writing.
The proposed project with the related projects would not result in an incremental conflict with the
congestion management plan. The Traffic Study summarized in Section 5.15, Transportation and Traffic,
of this Draft EIR, included all related projects in the analysis of traffic impacts. Based on the
information noted above and provided in mare detail in Section 5.15, Transportation and Tra�c, of this
Draft EIR there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to
congestion management plan when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects. Therefore,
there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation
measures are required.
Air Traffic
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to air traffic. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to air traf�c and no
mitigation measures would be required. Based on the analysis provided above the related projects and the
proposed projects would not have an impacts related to air traffic. Consequently, there would be no
incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to air traffic when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Hazards
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to traffic related hazards. The proposed project with the Project Design Features (PDF TRA-1
through TRA-8, TRA-11, TRA-12, and TRA-15) would have a less than significant impact to hazards for
transportation and traffic and no mitigation measures would be required. Analysis indicates that East
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-89
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Orange General Plan Amendment would not have impacts related to traffic related hazards. Less than
significant impacts were found related to the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates, Santiago Canyon College, and the proposed project. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determination at the time of this writing.
The proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental increase in hazards related
traffic. Based on the analysis provided above the related projects and the proposed projects would not
have an impacts related to hazards. Consequently, there would be no incremental or combined effects of
the proposed project related to traffic related hazards when viewed in connection with the effects of
related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Emergency Access
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to emergency access. The proposed project with the Project Design Features (PDF TRA-1
through TRA-8, TRA-11, and TRA-12) would have a less than significant impact to emergency access
and no mitigation measures would be required. Analysis indicates that the East Orange General Plan
Amendment and Holy Sepulcher Cemetery would have no impacts related to emergency access. Less
than significant impacts were found associated with the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates, Santiago Canyon College Santiago Canyon College, and the proposed project. The
Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
The proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental increase to the demand far
emergency access. Based on the analysis provided above the related projects and the proposed projects
would not have an impacts related to emergency access. Consequently, there would be no incremental or
combined effects of the proposed project related to emergency access when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Alternative Transportation
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to alternative transportation. The proposed project with the Project Design Features (PDF TRA-
10, TRA-11, TRA-12, and TRA-14, and PDF LUP and PDF REC) would have a less than significant
impact to alternative transportation and no mitigation measures would be required. Analysis indicates
that the East Orange General Plan Amendment would not have impacts related to alternative
transportation. Less than significant impacts were found for the Salem Lutheran Church, Expansion
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, Santiago Canyon College Santiago Canyon
College, and the proposed project. The Villa Park Self-Starage has no determination at the time of this
writing.
Page 6-90 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
The proposed project with the related projects would result in an incremental increase in the use or need
for alternative forms of transportation. Based on the analysis provided above, the related projects and the
proposed projects would not have an impacts related to alternative forms of transportation Consequently,
there would be no incremental or combined effects of the proposed project related to alternative
transportation when viewed in connection with the related projects, and the effects of probable future
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the cumulative traffic impacts is provided in Table 6-18, Cumulative Transportation and
Traffic Impact Summary. Based on the information presented above related increased traffic, congestion
management agency, air traffic, hazards, emergency access, and alternative transportation the project has
a significant potential to have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon transportation and
traffic.
Table 6-18: Cumulative Transportation and Traffic Impact Summary
Potentiallm acts
.r =
,a o d � � � °
� � N a�i c � �° d d � �
Environmental Issue L ` � � d � N � � � a
� ~ o � Q Q x Ea �' c
t� � w Q �
F-
Traffic
Rid eline E uestrian Estates LTS LTS NI LTS LTS LTS
East Oran e GPA LTS-M LTS-M NI NI NI NI
Hol Se ulcher Cemetery NI LTS-M NI NI NI LTS
Salem Lutheran Church
Ex ansion4 LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS
Santia o Can on College LTS-M LTS NI LTS LTS NI
Villa Park Self-Stora e NDM NDM NI NDM NDM NI
Rio Santia o(Pro osed Project) SIG LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS
Cumulative SIGCC-PM LTCC- NI LTCC LTCC LTCC
&RPM RPM
Notes:
1. Ridgeline Equestrian Estales Envrronmenta!lmpact Report,June,2011.
2. East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005.
3. Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negalive Declaralion No. /768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lulheron Church and School Specific Plan Druft EIR,February 2012.
5. Suntiugo Canyon College E/R,May 2005.
6. Rro Suntrago Orafi E/R,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significant without project mitigation
LTS-PM=less than significant with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCGRPM=1ess than cumulatively considerable with related project mitigation
SIG=significantand unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mi[igation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCGPM&RPM=significant wmulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
NI=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Communiry Planners(I�[ST,9).
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-91
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
6.3.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Introduction
This section will analyze utilities and service systems impacts of the project on the provision of
wastewater treatment services,provision of adequate water supplies, construction of storm water drainage
facilities,and landfill capacity.
Proposed Project
Based on the information provided in Section 5.17, Utilities and Service Systems, of this Draft EIR, the
proposed project has a less than significant impact related utility and service systems. Specifically, the
proposed project would have a less than significant impact to wastewater treatment requirements and no
mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact
to water or wastewater treatment facilities and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed
project would have a less than significant impact to storm drain facilities and no mitigation measures
would be required. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to water supplies and
no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed project would have a less than significant
impact to wastewater treatment capacity and no mitigation measures would be required. The proposed
project would have a less than significant impact to landfill capacity and no mitigation measures would be
required. The proposed project would have a less than significant impact to solid waste and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Related Projects
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Based on the information provided in the EIR, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates would not have any impacts
on landfill capacity during the long-term operational phase of the project. Potential impacts related to
wastewater treatment capacity, storm water drainage facilities, water supplies, and long-term landfill
capacity were less than significant and did not require mitigation. Impacts related to water and
wastewater treatment facilities and short-term landfill capacity were determined to be less than significant
with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures (Ridgeline Equestrian Estates
Environmental Impact Report, June, 2010). Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental
Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific mitigation measures.
East Orange GPA Project
The East Orange General Plan Amendment project environmental document concluded that impacts
related to the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, sufficiency of water supplies,
adequate wastewater treatment capacity, and adequate landfill capacity were rendered less than significant
with mitigation(East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR,November 2005). Refer to the
East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November 2005 for specific mitigation
measures.
Page 6-92 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Project
The environmental document far the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery determined that impacts related to
exceeding wastewater treatment requirements and compliance with solid waste regulations would be less
than significant. Impacts associated with the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities,
sufficiency of water supplies, adequate wastewater treatment capacity, and landfill capacity were also less
than significant. The construction of new storm drain facilities was determined to be less than significant
with mitigation (Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May
2008). Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,
May 2008 for specific mitigation measures.
Salem Lutheran Church Expansion Project
The data provided in the Draft EIR for the project indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion
would have less than significant impacts related to this topical issue.
Santiago Canyon College Project
The Santiago Canyon College environmental document concluded that impacts related to provision of
wastewater treatment services,provision of adequate water supplies, construction of storm water drainage
facilities, and landf'ill capacity were all less than significant with mitigation (Santiago Canyon College
Final EIR, May 2005). Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific
mitigation measures.
Villa Park Se/f-Storage Project
The proposed Villa Park Self-Storage would require the provision of domestic water for storage unit
sprinkler system, on-site landscaping and the on-site caretaker residence and wastewater treatment
services for the caretaker residence. Water and wastewater conveyance lines would be required as well as
storm water conveyance infrastructure. The Villa Park Self-Storage would result in an increased demand
for the provision of wastewater treatment services, construction of storm water drainage facilities, and
landfill capacity as the site is currently undeveloped. Due to the nature of the land use, the demand for
domestic water, wastewater treatment capacity, and landfill capacity would be minimal and less than
significant impacts would be expected.
Analysis
Wastewater Treatment
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to wastewater treatment. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher Cemetery, and the proposed
project would have less than significant impacts related to wastewater treatment. Mitigation measures
were provided far Santiago Canyon College to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to
the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park
Self-Storage has no determinarion at the rime of this writing.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-93
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Related projects would generate additional sewage volume. Coordination with the City, Orange County,
Orange County Sanitation District, along with payment of service and facilities fees would be needed to
ensure sewer service to future developments. These fees are established by the agencies and utilized to
fund operation and maintenance of the treatment plants and sewer mains, as well as for expansion of the
needed facilities. It would be speculative to consider that these fees might not be adequate to support the
needs of the respective agencies. Extension of sewer lines would be made in coordination with the City,
Orange County, and Orange County Sanitation District. Based on the information provided in
environmental documentation for each of the related project, there is existing and/or planned capacity for
each related project.
Based on the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to wastewater treatment when viewed in connection with the effects of related
projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and
no mitigation measures are required.
Water or Wastewater Treatment Facilities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to water or wastewater treatment facilities. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church
Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy Sepulcher
Cemetery, and the proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to water or
wastewater treatment facilities. Mitigation measures were provided for Santiago Canyon College to
reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May
2005 for the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time
of this writing.
Future development projects would generate additional sewage volume. Coordination with the City,
Orange County, Orange County Sanitation District, along with payment of service and facilities fees
would be needed to ensure sewer service to future developments. These fees are used to fund operation
and maintenance of the treatment plants and sewer mains, as well as for expansion of the needed
facilities. Extension of sewer lines would be made in coordination with the City, Orange County, and
Orange County Sanitation District.
Based on the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to water or wastewater treatment facilities when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
Storm Water Drainage Facilities
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to storm water drainage facilities. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion,
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, and the proposed project would
Page 6-94 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
have less than significant impacts related to storm water drainage facilities. Mitigation measures were
provided for Santiago Canyon College and Holy Sepulcher Cemetery to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level (refer to: Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005; and,Holy Sepulcher Cemetery
Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008). The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determination at the time of this writing.
The related projects and the proposed project would increase impervious paved surfaces and limit natural
recharge of the groundwater. They would also increase storm water run-off volumes. However, major
storm drain lines have been constructed in the area to accommodate storm water from and are available to
serve the project area. Individual developments are also required to provide on-site facilities and storm
drain facilities on public roadways to convey run off into the drainage system. The related projects and
the proposed project are required to not increase storm water run-off volumes beyond the ability of
downstream facilities to absorb run-off.
Based on the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to storm water drainage facilities when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore,
there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation
measures are required.
Water Supplies
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to water supplies. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline
Equestrian Estates and East Orange General Plan Amendment would have less than significant impacts
related to water supplies. Mitigation measures were provided for Santiago Canyon College, Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery, and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Refer to
the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06, May 2008 for specific
mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this writing.
The increased demand for water from future development projects, plus the proposed project within the
project area, would result in increases in water consumption. Coordination with the City Water
Department and payment of connection and service fees would be needed to ensure water service to the
related developments and the continued availability of imported water supplies and groundwater
resources. Extension of water lines to serve individual lots and building pads would need to be made in
coordination with the affected water company.
Based on the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to water supplies when viewed in connection with the effects of related projects.
Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no
mitigation measures are required.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-95
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to wastewater treatment capacity. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion,
Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, and the proposed project would
have less than significant impacts related to wastewater treatment capacity. Mitigation measures were
provided for Santiago Canyon College and Holy Sepulcher Cemetery to reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for the specific mitigation
measures. Refer to the Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 1768-06,
May 2008 for specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time
of this writing.
Coordination with the City, Orange County, Orange County Sanitation District, along with payment of
service and facilities fees would be needed to ensure sewer service to future developments. These fees
are used to fund operation and maintenance of the treatment plants and sewer mains, as well as for
expansion of the needed facilities. Extension of sewer lines would be made in coordination with the Ciry,
Orange County, and Orange County Sanitation District.
Based on the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to wastewater treatment volumes related to capacity when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental
effect which could be cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Landfill Capacity
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to landfill capacity. Analysis indicates that the Salem Lutheran Church Expansion and Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery would have less than significant impacts related to landfill capacity. Mitigation
measures were provided for Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment,
Santiago Canyon College, and the proposed project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Refer to the Ridgeline Equestrian Estates Environmental Impact Report, June, 2011 for the specific
mitigation measures. Refer to the East Orange General Plan Amendment Supplemental EIR, November
2005 for specific mitigation measures. Refer to the Santiago Canyon College Final EIR, May 2005 for
the specific mitigation measures. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no determination at the time of this
writing and worse case was assumed.
Mitigation measures developed for the Villa Park Self-Storage projects would incorparate mitigation
measures into future environmental documentation would likely result in less than significant impacts.
The three landfills in Orange County have adequate existing and future reserve capacity to serve the
proposed project and related project. The permitted aggregate landfill capacity is 20,500 tons-per-day.
Based on the above, the proposed project and related projects would represent an incremental de minims
increase. Consequently, there would be no incremental ar combined effects of the proposed project
related to landfill volume increase related to capacity when viewed in connection with the effects of
Page 6-96 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
6.0 Cumulative
related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be cumulatively
considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Solid Waste
The proposed project, when combined with the related projects, would not result in significant impacts
related to solid waste for the landfill capacity reasons stated above. Analysis indicates that the Salem
Lutheran Church Expansion, Ridgeline Equestrian Estates, East Orange General Plan Amendment, Holy
Sepulcher Cemetery, and the proposed project would have no impacts related to solid waste. Less than
significant impacts were found for Santiago Canyon College. The Villa Park Self-Storage has no
determination at the time of this writing.
Based on the information provided above, there would be no incremental or combined effects of the
proposed project related to solid waste volume increase related to capacity when viewed in connection
with the effects of related projects. Therefore, there would be no incremental effect which could be
cumulatively considerable and no mitigation measures are required.
Summary of Analysis
A summary of the utility and service system impacts is provided in Table 6-19, Cumulative Utilities and
Service Systems Summary. Based on the information presented above related to wastewater treatment,
water or wastewater treatment facilities, storm water drainage facilities, water supplies, wastewater
treatment capacity, landfill capacity, and solid waste, the project does not have a significant potential to
have a cumulatively considerable incremental effect upon cumulative public services change impacts.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 6-97
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
6.0 Cumulative
Table 6-19: Cumulative Utilities and Service Systems Impact Summary
Potentiallm acts
� d
a�i ,� m ,� °' �
E � _ c � E =
Environmental Issue �' N c�a o d a �' �' a �
`m � w +� = N � � U 'S
_ � m Q.
� d � �
d d v � � ° dU � o
c tA
3 � � N 3 3 J
3 � �
Utilities and Service S stems
Ridgeline Equestrian
Estates� LTC LTC-M LTC LTC LTC LTC-M NI
East Oran e GPA LTC LTGM LTC LTC-M LTC-M LTC-M NI
Holy Sepulcher
Cemeter 3 LTC LTC LTC-M LTC LTC LTC NI
Salem Lutheran Church LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS
Ex ansion
Santiago Canyon
Colle es LTC-M LTGM LTC-M LTC-M LTC-M LTC-M LTC
Viila Park Self-Stora e NDM NDM NDM NDM NDM NDM NDM
Rio Santiago(Proposed
Pro'ect)6 LTS LTC-M LTC LTC-M LTC LTC-M NI
Cumulative LTCC LTCC-PM LTCC LTCC-PM LTCC LTC-PM NI
Notes:
1. Ridgeline EgUestrian Estates Environmen[al Impact Report,J�ne,2011.
2. Eust Orange General Plan Amendment Supp/emental ElR,November 2005.
3. Holy SepuJcher Cemetery Expansion Mitigated Negative Declaration No.1768-06,May 2008.
4. Salem Lutheran Church and Schoo[SpeciTc Plan Draft EIR,February�012.
5. Sun�iago Canyon Col(ege ElR,May 2005.
6. Rro Santiago Draft EIR,May 2013.
Abbreviations:
CC=cumulatively considerable
LTS=less than significa�t without project mitigation
LTS-PM=Iess than significa�t with project mitigation
LTS-RPM=less than significant with related project mitigation
LTCC=less than cumulatively considerable
LTCC-PM=less than cumulatively considerable with project mitigation
LTCC-RPM=]ess than cumutatively co�siderable with related project mitigation
SIG=signi£cant and unavoidable
SIG-PM=significant and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCC-PM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation
SIGCGPM&RPM=significant cumulatively considerable and unavoidable with project mitigation and related project mitigation
N[=no impact
NDM=no determination made
Source: Vista Community Planners(ViST,4).
Page 6-98 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
�.. ,
SECTION 7.0; ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT `
7.1 Introduction
State CEQA Guidelines
The State CEQA Guidelines require EIRs to describe a range of alternatives to the proposed project, or to
the location of the proposed project, which would feasibly achieve most of the basic project objectives,
but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects identified in the analysis.
Additionally, an EIR may only consider alternatives that are feasible. Even within all of these parameters,
an EIR is not required to consider every conceivable alternative to a proposed project. However,
alternatives may be considered even if they would impede, to some degree, the attainment of project
objectives or be more costly(provided that they remain economically feasible). The analysis contained in
this section includes an analysis of each identified alternative with respect to each of the environmental
issues evaluated for the proposed project
The analysis contained in this section compares each of the alternatives to the project, and includes an
analysis of each alternative with respect to each of the environmental issues evaluated for the proposed
project. In addition, the analysis of alternatives includes the assumption that all applicable mitigation
measures associated with the proposed project would be implemented with an alternative, where
applicable. However, applicable mitigation measures may be scaled to reduce or avoid the potential
impacts of the alternative under consideration, and may not precisely match those identified for the
proposed project.
CEQA provides that a project cannot be approved, if there are feasible alternatives that would
substantially lessen its environmental effects. The City may reject alternatives as infeasible, if based on
substantial evidence in the record,the decision-makers find the alternatives are impractical or undesirable
from a policy standpoint. [California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz(2009) 177 Cal. App. 4th
957]
Environmentally Superior Alternative
The State CEQA Guidelines require EIRs to identify one of the alternatives as being environmentally,
though not necessarily economically, superior to the other alternatives. The environmentally superior
alternative is the alternative from among the analyzed range of alternatives that would result in the fewest
or least significant environmental impacts. If the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project
Alternative, then another environmentally superior alternative must be selected from the remaining
alternatives.
For the proposed project, the Environmentally Superior Alternative is the No Project -No Development
Alternative based on the analysis contained in this section. Therefore from among the remaining
alternatives proposed, the Alternative 8: Residential Development Alternative is the Environmentally
Superior Alternative.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-1
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
7.1.1 Alternatives Eliminated from Consideration
No identified alternatives have been rejected from further consideration in this Draft EIR. '°
7.1.2 Alternatives Identified For Evaluation and Reasons for Including Selected
Alternatives
The State CEQA Guidelines provide that the Lead Agency (City of Orange) shall select a reasonable
range of alternatives to be evaluated as noted below.
An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the
project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or
substantially lessen any of the signifrcant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the
alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must
consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making
and public participation. [Section 15126.6(a)J
The range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those that could feasibly
accomplish most of the basic objectives of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one
or more of the significant effects. The EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the
alternatives to be discussed. The EIR should also ident� any alternatives that were considered
by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process and briefly explain
the reasons underlying the lead agency's determination. Additional information explaining the
choice of alternatives may be included in the administrative record. Among the factors that may
be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are:(i)failure to meet
most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant
environmental impacts. [Section 15126.6(c)J
The City has selected the alternatives (listed below) for consideration in the Draft EIR: As required by
Section 15126.6(a) cited above, the Alternatives were selected because one or more of the Alternatives
could avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the Project. The Off-Site Location
Alternative was analyzed in compliance with the language of Section 15126.6(a), which provides for
consideration of alternative locations. The Residential Development Alternative was analyzed to foster
and ensure fully informed decision making and public participation, as provided in Section 15126.6(a).
• No Project Alternative—No Development;
• No-Project Alternative—Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning;
• Mixed Use Development Alternative —Open Space, Recreation, Commercial, and Residential;
• Mixed Use Development Alternative—Open Space,Recreation, and Storage;
• All Recreation Alternative;
• Mixed Use Development Alternative;
Page 7-2 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
7.0 Alternatives
• Cluster Residential Development Alternative;
• Residential Development Alternative; and,
• Off-Site Location Alternative.
This section describes each alternative, provides a statistical summary of the land uses anticipated under
each alternative, and provides a schematic of the land use that would occur. State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15126.6 requires that an EIR contain a description of "...a range of reasonable alternatives to the
project, or to the location of a project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the
project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the signifrcant effects of the project, and evaluate
the comparative merits of the alternatives." The following are descriptions of each of the alternatives the
City has chosen for consideration.
Alternative 1: No Project Alternative—No Development
This alternative evaluates what would be reasonably expected to occur on the project site in the
foreseeable future, if the proposed project were not approved. The City is not aware of any plans for
development of the project site other than the proposed project. The environmental conditions existing at
the time the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was published would be assumed to continue, subject to
changes resulting from reasonably projected contraction or expansion of the existing uses. The City
Attorney has stated that the materials recycling (i.e., asphalt and concrete crushing) would require
approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit for expansion. This alternative would allow for the
comparison of the environmental effects of existing conditions and uses against the environmental effects
that would occur if the proposed project were approved.
Table 7-1, Summary of No-Project Alternative —No Development, provides a statistical summary of the
land uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-1,No Project Alternative—No Development, depicts
a schematic of the land use under this alternative. Under this alternative, the uses described below would
occur.
Table 7-1: Summary of No Project Alternative—No Development
Units/
Planning Alternative No. 1 � Gross Percent
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres of Site
Feet
A No develo ment Vacant(85%)&Backfillin (15%) 0 50 acres 45%
B No development Backfilling(100%) 0 10 acres 9%
C Resource Area Backfillin (80%)&Othe (20%) 0 16 acres 15%
D Resource Area Vacant(85%)&Materials Recycling 0 34 acres 31%
(15%)
Total 0 110 acres 100%
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate, drive,parking, and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-3
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
__ _��. _ _ .
� -,.. .�, � ,�> � �
� � ,� � �- � � ` '��— � x
� �
t
� «. � „ � � �
� # � Z �
.i��d *
�- � . � �
' �"' � � � �.�..-•-�
�t� �
•"." � �' � :� ' ' �� � � ,� �
F
.
..
,
��� . r- � .
� �
�� � ,� ^� ,�- . �
��. �.� ,� �� � Q,+ w f�
� t" ��� � � ,, �j �
k� � � ��� • *:.� � a< .� � o
. �
,_.� � � � ��
� � ,��.. ,
� . �, � . ��
_ �
�" z
� # � � ,�� � -.�� 'A" ��,r
, , . M
m > , .
� i .,s �, �,.
�� '� � ��� "w= � � o �� �f
,� �' �� � ��� � � � �_ � � .'� �+
"� "�. . � ° " ` , �� �
�� � � �,���
— � � ��� � �$ � * '�
_ . t.���
� .
� �� ,� � � �� � � '
'� '� � �5 � �.-�. "� .�`� ",
`"� � r a'� �� , �a
,� � � � ��» �
�.� �`� ' �� � .
� � � ��.g �� t � #�� � r� . ... #��' ��� � . +i�:'� .
#r �
i^ �� ,., �.. � �. � �. �� .. � ' . r_,
� ��*'. ,.r W
Sr TF�
'�'�F� �: � .. � � � rTl �
��•� 1 1
A#� � * � a
.v. ...� � g�.:. U � ..� a� .... �l �
��.w.. ... � :.k� � O
� � � °� �^ �, # � � (�I
� � � �
, ° � O
;�„. _ �. _ ,"" �: a
. .�' � , � .
� . . ;p• ' � ; � �" -
, �
r � +� �' � ^ ` a�� '�u . '� � � �
� . ��� #. t
� �
� �� �
� �
e
��� �� � : <. �,�" � �"�
. .s � � '` � �'� .�,�., "� �" ` � i � Y--1
� � �
� � � * � _ �b
""�� �_� .+�p <��� 6€ � � r � $ (� '
� � � , �� , � � E�
, . • .
�
� ���°' � � � � - "� i � W.� .
* � "'� � � R >.��� � �w �C� * � § �� �4��Tc.'� [� ' J
... : � � �,. *
. g... � .. �.� "�`*.� roa l ' O
'��� J� � w ��` �-,... ��..�� � .� $ .< �� �
� � � ��- . � .. � ��� � /�� �
�• ,x .. � ::� ;.�.
'f "� � '�' h'r'y
� � � � "`" �� ♦ �
a �
' r �x, e
� � � � Or�
� T > . ! ,`�` , �... . ,_ .,�`
� �� O� /
�. �,� w :� � `�� � "'*'"^`�� � � "° V
� � .�` � � ���raa.� � ` �4 .� 1�1 L
.
3� ; ^ �
� �
� �,� �� � F+�
A � � ��sy�+� � � �
: � i. �'•s. p ��.. .., .� �--�
x . , ,. � b# ��,. + � O r��
, � � V1
„
� �� �� '� . • � 'q N
. ' a �
��� � � ,�,�S � � 0
� �R ^� �. ��
. *� � � i ��* # � � � �
, u,-_ :
N
� �. �
,
�w��. •� ���r _ ". � . �sy " .... „. . �"
� '� } ""/`::4 `-� ^��, ' � � ..�� �,�s " "�{+� - . Q`�� a ,S.'
�, T t� � �i
� . s�°' , /` �. f � �-"p � W
z
� , a
� � � �` �s � � � � o
� � � �t, ��� �� �� �,� �
� ��` :� ;A� *�" . �� �� �, � $ , � ;�
` ° �,m,�� '�`r,� r� W
� "�� � �� � �_ � � �� � �� �
.
�� ' � �� �
— � " ��a�� �
�.. �?� �. �11�:: . .` . '��.. �..� � .:�� . .._�r+t� C/�
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative 2: No Project Alternative— Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning
This alternative evaluates the development of the project site for uses permitted under the City's existing
General Plan and Zoning. The City General Plan Policy Map designates the project site as Resource
Area, Low-Density Residential, and Open Space. The existing City General Plan Policy Map is depicted
in Figure 3-7, Existing and Proposed General Plan. The City's current Zoning Map designates the
portion of the project site north of Santiago Creek as R-1-8 (Single-family Residential), with the
remainder of the project site designated S-G (Sand and Gravel Extraction). The existing zoning district
classifications are depicted in Figure 3-10,Existing and Proposed Zoning Districts.
Table 7-2, Summary of No Project Alternative —Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning,
provides a statistical summary of the land uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-2, No Project
Alternative—Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning, depicts a schematic of the land use
under this alternative. Under this alternative,the uses described below would occur.
South of Santiago Creek
Approximately 5 acres in the southeastern portion of the project site would remain in use for materials
recycling. The materials recycling use could not be relocated and/or expanded without other permitting
processes. A total of approximately 57 acres to the south of Santiago Creek are designated Resource
Area (RA) (Planning Areas B, C, and D). The RA designation also allows for agricultural uses and
continued use of stream and river channels for aggregate mining. Passive and active recreational uses are
also permitted. This designation may serve as a holding zone for future uses compatible with established
and planned land uses in the surrounding area. (City General Plan, Page LU-23 and Table LU-1, Land
Use Designations) This area is zoned S-G (Sand and Gravel Extraction). Permitted uses in the S-G
District include: agriculture; horticulture activity; backfilling with inert materials; and, mining, quarrying,
extraction or storage of raw mineral products (including sand, gravel, rock, clay, etc.). Conditionally
permitted uses include: cement or concrete mixing or batching plant; landfill(sanitary); manufacture from
raw materials extracted on-site; and, parks either public or private. (OMC Section 17.32.020, Permitted
Uses) Material feedstock for operations in this area would continue to originate from off-site sources.
North of Santiago Creek
Land uses permitted in the RA, OS, and LDR (Low Density Residential) designations would be
developed to the north of Santiago Creek with access from Mayberry Avenue. A,total of 17 single-family
residences would be constructed on approximately 12 acres (11%) of the area to the north of Santiago
Creek. The minimum lot size would be approximately 8,000 square feet. These residences would not be
restricted in regards to occupant age. Improvements to this portion of the project site and the adjacent
public street would occur. Additionally, approximately 38 acres to the north and south of Santiago Creek
are designated RA (described above) and Open Space(OS). These 38 acres are zoned in S-G (described
above).
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-5
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
Drainage and water quality improvements would be provided to meet all City requirements. City park
requirements would be met through the payment of fees. Material feedstock for operations in this area
would continue to originate from off-site sources.
Santiago Creek
No changes to Santiago Creek would occur under this alternative. For the purpose of this alternative, no
flood improvements to protect the residential uses on the north side of the Santiago Creek were assumed.
If this alternative were to be selected, the need for flood control improvements, if any, would need to be
determined.
Table 7-2: Summary of No-Project Alternative—Development Under
Existing General Plan and Zoning
Alternative Units/
Planning No. 2 Existing Land Use' Square Gross Percent of
Area Land Use Feet Acres Site
Residential 17 units 12 acres 11%
'� Resource Area Vacant(85%)&Backfilling(15%)
0 38 acres 35%
Open Space
B Resource Area Backfilling(100%) 0 10 9%
C Resource Area Backfilling(80%)&Other (20%) 0 16 15%
D Resource Area Vacant(85%)&Materials � 34 31%
Recyclin (IS%)
Total 17 units 110 acres 100%
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate,drive,parking, and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
Page 7-6 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
_--�� z� �
i�� �� �
; � �
' r j Q w w
� t ,� � �
� i� `-' °z
i \' �
.�
l , <
� ---�„�.-__
� i ,�.1 `,1
,� ,
, -
j \�1 ���%' � 1
, �
` 'f�`@yg�� o � � `J
� ' �
. �
1 `
r ��`.`, ,',' � q a' � � ! [� 1--1
� �
r t �N = � � z
I � .�'�, , -� w � ' / w Z
� �, ,��, � � � O
� ; � � � ,� ,�, 1 � N
� � � - , ;,� � � , , a
� °' � � � OQw
�� � Q L,�", � �� � � � Z C7
� � � � .' / \ 1 � � Z
� � .,; , .s , � o �
� ' � � �1 � ---�-- �"
� 1 J--- Easement u �nt�+`LRoad ,--- � �
\ .,�-y �-----____---�t � W � �
c-� � , � , � ` ^ � w
, ��� � �' .' � � + � H ,..� �
/ l \� , � rT'l � H
U
,..._✓ ' U � i � ^ ~
� � m� � � � � � `�
' �:N m 4 � F-,
,
�` � `1' N � t � w
� � W �,
m Q � �� � ��, Z �
� � � � /'� �
� L U ./ � w W I"'�"I
c � � j ` � u O
c ,n � \
C � T�1
� � � ` � �
a
c.�'.. m � � � �
, � � � z
• � 0�,4 m ��_
� �-
C
' U �'
m.N � d �--� �
`. �W � � � � v�
• `\ `—° � F+i E"'� �
� � O � a
�..._ W
� � �
�
� w
� '
�_ � O Q
, � Z Z
� w �
; �
..___._� �
0
�
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative 3: Mixed Use Development Alternative — Open Space, Recreation, Commercial,
and Residential
This alternative includes the development of the project site with a mixture of open space, recreational,
commercial, and residential uses. Under this alternative, Planning Areas A and B would be developed the
same as the proposed project. Approximately 125,000 square feet of retail commercial uses would be
developed in Planning Area C. A total of 420 age-qualified housing units would be developed in
Planning Area D. This alternative would also include private internal streets, open space and recreation
areas, along with equestrian and bicycle riding, and hiking trail linkages along East Santiago Canyon
Road and Santiago Creek. Flood control improvements would be provided to protect the residential
development in Planning Area D. Drainage and water quality improvements would be provided to meet
all City requirements. City park requirements would be met through the payment of fees and/or
combination of dedication of trails and private recreation areas.
Table 7-3, Summary of Mixed Use Development Alternative - Open Space, Recreation, Commercial, and
Residential, provides a statistical summary of the land uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-3,
Mixed Use Development Alternative - Open Space, Recreation, Commercial, and Residential, depicts a
schematic of potential land uses under this alternative.
Table 7-3: Summary of Mixed Use Development Alternative -Open Space, Recreation,
Commercial, and Residential
Units/
Planning Alternative No. 3 � Gross Percent
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres of Site
Feet
A Open Space Vacant(85%)&Backfilling(15%) 0 SOacres 45%
Active Recreation
such as,ball fields,
B sports courts, Backfilling(100%) 0 10 acres 9%
multi-purpose
facilities, etc.
C Commercial Backfilling(80%)&Otherz(20%) 125,000 sq. 16 acres 15%
D Residential Vacant(85%)&Materials Recycling 420-units 34 acres 31%
(15%)
125,000 sq.
Total ft. &420 110 100%
units acres
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate,drive,parking, and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
Page 7-8 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
M
� �
.�.,..- �? z� �
` � �,
1 ----____ 1 `p
�-�� � � �� N �
� �II� � I �' > �- � = L'7
Q J N U� F--�1
j �,� � � � � -� Qo � W w
1 G � .sN � N
ljrj'}�� �� , c m � `r' � � �
► ' �I(1`� ��%" , � � � O
�
(����,.,, `� � � z
!�_ t�"';,� \
� � � �a-� �. � ; ?
�, �, � � -_�, ; , �
� �� � � 1� �
��,;� � , , , z �,
�,? r � J w
`` ��,�,r
j��l my� / �`"��� �~q a w
�'`4,/ �1 ` 1 O Q
�} �
t `''1,� �," r � F--�
��;,�� r � � w v�
� „� � � a ' � �
�,,,
, � � ,
, , � Q �
�
, `\I '1 � � j � Z
ilii �� Z �
'j i j.;�asem ent_ _ _ r' � � Q
,
� � -�_ �_...+�'� _.�._ � i
�s ��!��' � *� � �{ � � U
Q � � � '` � �'.. ......U � L_!'rrr r � � `� i9 w �r�.�y' � O
. � @ � � '04 d' � .L � N l '
t Q N U ��\`� �� e���$ �. � � � O � � �
� Ol � Q 5�' � �� � Y �C p � � � � I--1
_ �O I'� � @ � � � " � �
� � 1 ,
� � ,� � �� i °- �, W �
� o `; .�� � .',�J Z � U
�
��`` � �J W � o
��� �
1`; � A-' � a
� - � o
,� � : :, , �,,, O ^
t; `� ` '-� z �
,r, � � `� W �
s n{ �� , � O �
`�� � �� \ w � �
���\ ;. � Q � V1
, �� � m � O
't\ �� � � �, W �--{
� \ \ �-- U +-�+ N
� i�,` �� :� Q � � �i
'�„`� \ c �. u- o �
.. � � � � W
� t � � Q �
�,`��`�� � � W
, x � �
. � � �
� �
.. � �
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative 4: Mixed Use Development Alternative—Open Space, Recreation, and Storage
This alternative includes the development of the project site with a mixture of open space, recreational
(including equestrian), and storage uses. Under this alternative, Planning Area A would be developed the
same as the proposed project. Planning Areas B and C would be developed with active recreational uses
(i.e., soccer, baseball, softball, tennis, etc.). Planning Area D would be developed with approximately
480,000 syuare feet of storage and equestrian/stable (recreation) uses. No flood control improvement to
Santiago Creek would be provided in this alternative. This alternative would also include private internal
streets, open space and recreation areas, and equestrian and bicycle riding, and hiking trail linkages along
East Santiago Canyon Road and Santiago Creek.
Table 7-4, Summary of Mixed Use Development Alternative - Open Space, Recreation, and Storage,
provides a statistical summary of the land uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-4, Mixed Use
Development Alternative - Open Space, Recreation, and Storage, depicts a schematic of potential land
uses under this alternative.
Table 7-4: Summary of Mixed Use Development Alternative—
Open Space, Recreation, and Storage
Planning Alternative No.4 � Units/ Gross Percen
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres t of
Feet Site
Open Space and
Active Recreation
A such as, sports activity Vacant(85%)&Backfilling(15%) 0 50 acres 45%
fields, sports courts,
etc.
Active Recreation
such as, sports activity 81 000
B fields,sports courts, Backfilling(100%) S ' ft 10 acres 9%
multi-purpose q'
facilities,etc.
Active Recreation
such as,sports activity
C fields, sports courts, Backfilling(80%)&Other2(20%) 0 16 acres 15%
multi-purpose
facilities,etc.
D Storage Vacant(85%)&Materials Recycling 480,000 2�acres 25%
(15%) s . ft.
D Equestrian/Stable 0 7 acres 6%
81,000
Total sq, ft.& 110 100%
480,000 acres
s ft.
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate, drive,parking, and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
Page 7-10 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
� d-
o = �
� � z� �
� ,� � �
. � � �
m@Q
1 �� "� v�riri�o \ .� �, �- �
� m
� � �7
� �i � � �
; � W o �
�
.� � W w
; � � , -� � �, � � �
�( � � t � Ls v o � v�i
I �� � � oQo
jf � � � N� � z
� � � � � � �
� �� m � t �� d
c. `
� � ( � �,` F�!~ ""----L
� 1� � � -- —`1
�.�_ � � � � z
� �� -� � �--------> > , w
, ��'`i��F�°� � —J A-+
9/
� � � � a
l �� \��v�`� ,,. � � � ; 0
� 4 �� ��� V , ,� � � 1
� Y � � �, ��1, � W W
� o a *� �,�, � , � � L7 W
�
� � /% � � 1`� �-�-�. �=--� � '--' c�
� H �
� ° %y�'��1 ��«� � � , � Oz
;�, � ��J �-�.""" , � �
� ) �._�-- � �. o
, _ _____ �/�
� ,� J� � Easement: _----�-"-- - V1 �
i \�� �� � I , f� v U oy ^ Q 0
�� � mN < < l� �-� � mm � � � Z �
�1� Qam ��` tio Q � LQ � � �
�'� ii � � �� � `� �
�i � m
= �'� 11 i � � � `� � E-+ � H
m � aQ
; li � � � Z � W
� : (�� W ti
� � � ` .1-- � � o
t,� � � � � �
���� � � �� .� � a a
;��� 1 � � � o p � o
0
�, ` `�\ � i�.- :. �-.-a � �
a � �j� a � w
� � .. � ,�. . '� . H
� � �� � ��� � � z
`�, � � . �'��,,� ^w � �
ti � �`� `�.,\�--� m Q ~ � o
� R -� �\ , @ ° TW� �" �
a \`� � U �' � V 1
a� :- �
— U �� —�� . \ \\� m� � � �
.,,..^�:: � ) C � � � �
``1 C Q �
l � � " ' � U
.. \\\`�� � � � 1�
t � � yr � �
r�i
W ��
`�.�,,,+ ' � ^
�� O
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative No. 5—All Recreation Alternative
This alternative includes the development of the project site with a mixture of open space and active
recreational uses. Under this alternative, Planning Areas A, B, C, and D and would be developed with
active recreational uses. This alternative would also include internal streets, open space and recreation
areas, and equestrian and bicycling riding, and hiking trail linkages along East Santiago Canyon Road and
Santiago Creek. No flood control improvement to Santiago Creek would be provided in this alternative.
Table 7-5, Summary All Recreation Alternative, provides a statistical summary of the land uses
anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-5,All Recreation Alternative, depicts a schematic of potential
land uses under this alternative.
Table 7-5: Summary of All Recreation Alternative
Units/
Planning Alternative No. 5 � Gross Percent
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres of Site
Feet
Active Recreation such as, sports
A activity fields, sports courts, Vacant(85%)&Backfilling 0 50 acres 45%
multi-purpose facilities, dog park, (15%)
etc.
Active Recreation such as, sports
B activity fields, sports courts, Backfilling(100%) 0 10 acres 9%
multi-purpose facilities, etc.
Active Recreation such as, sports Backfilling(80%)&Otherz
C activity fields, sports courts, �20o�a� 0 16 acres 15%
multi- u ose facilities,etc.
Active Recreation such as, ball Vacant(85%)&Materials
D fields, sports courts, Recycling(15%) 0 34 acres 31%
multi- u ose facilities,etc.
Total 110 100%
acres
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate, drive,parking, and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
Page 7-12 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
�
., z� �
o �
T \ o o � � � �
� � j ,� � � = � � � �
t � � amo � � �r�
` 1 } ` Qvii � U — � `J
m °� ,� Q �' � � ~
1 � � ' ` C � � � C m � � W �I
t .� � o c•} m � o
� i ` � " � ~ m � � �
I ' 1 � a � � � ~ �
, I� , � z
� � << �;. _
. `� �`� , l
`' 1
''��'�� �;�� � � . -
�
Ir�� ,�� ��ayel . / �� �
r l � . , 4 ��,/ �--Q � �
f o 1 l` ,� ( • �a t� r
I Y t , , �\ � i'�� �
�
� �0 4�'� : 1 `, . � y��t� � � W
1 ��� \� �' ` �- • L�a� � � � C7
�:� / �� , �� �l � � � � �
l : �� I � �
�/ / '1 � �,.�..."'�.�/' � �
� / � �� � �
� �/ CS � � t �V' b
f �
, ��= Q ; ��� $ W �
\` @ °�' � � �,���� � [� �''
{ � �o � � �, � � � H
4� <( �- � � .� v � V F,,,� F--�
� � �� . °� �� Q � f �
'j � c � �, � � � i � � ' � � ,
�� � o �� �
Jf `�` �� N��--- Z U
I ` � �i`�� � O
� �� `1� � H �
��»� � � 11 ` Q a
,�` � 1 O
`` � t ( 1 � �
\ `1 a ��� l j ) � �
� � �`\� W z
�\ U >>� - �
, � � ... ��� �" � �
�\ ``_ '`�`� o � .� � ,��/
a � ��` � m m � m � I�-�I
� `\ � m LL U
. �. � a
....1.—�\ � � �
\ � `Z � � ri
, � �� � � �
�'���� \` " �C Q �
t l � ��\ , � �
t �"
: � w
� �
�`--'� o
�
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative No. 6—Mixed Use Development Alternative
This alternative includes the development of the project site with a mixture of open space, recreational,
and residential uses. Under this alternative, Planning Area A would be developed the same as the
proposed project. Planning Areas B and C would be developed with active recreational uses. Planning
Area D would be developed with residential and equestrian uses. These residences would not be
restricted in regards to occupant age. Flood control improvement to Santiago Creek would be provided in
this alternative, as may be needed to protect residential uses. This alternative would also include internal
streets, open space and recreation areas, and riding and hiking trail linkages along Santiago Canyon Road
and Santiago Creek. This alternative would include an equestrian loop trail around the proposed
development areas. While this alternative proposes off-site land uses (7.5 acres equestrian arena site
across East Santiago Canyon Road), this off-site use has not been considered within this report. This
plan was originated by members of the Orange Park Areas(OPA)Real Estate Committee.
Table 7-6, Summary of Mixed Use Development Alternative provides a statistical summary of the land
uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-6, Mixed Use Development Alternative, depicts a
schematic of potential land uses under this alternative.
Table 7-6: Summary of Mixed Use Development Alternative
Units/
Planning Alternative No. 6 � Gross Percent
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres of Site
Feet
A Natural Open Space Vacant(85%)&Backfilling o
(I S%) 0 50 acres 45/o
B Active Recreational(i.e.,
pool,driving range,tennis, Backfilling(100%) 0 10 acres 9%
putting green,soccer
fields,and baseball)
C Active Recreational(i.e.,
pool,driving range,tennis, Backfilling(80%)&Otherz 0 16 acres 15%
putting green, soccer (20%)
fields,and baseball)
Portion Single-Family Residences 20-units
of D 1-acre 27 acres 25%
Vacant(85%)&Materials minimum
Portion Active Recreational(i.e., Recycling(15%)
of D arena,barn,stalls,pipe o
stalls,shoe station,turn 0 7 acres 6/o
outs,and ha storage)
Total 110 acres 100%
1. Existing/and use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate, drive,parking,and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
Page 7-14 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
...� ' }�•`4- � � �/
� �� - .� z �
F ; .�y µ� 4��x f�
. �M►�- <� _�; ,- _ (�
,� :� : ;t -- �� . : s� = �
4 Zf ? � �
�1�� � i�. �.
1� zs, ��� ( ' '�r'. ; _ ` ~—I
� ,�Q ,�� '.` i G � � W �i
j 'iR�. � � _ � ,� / � � U
{ � , �^ � �n
� �� ,�1:.� � �} Z
, , �-�" �
� �`;� � �i,; .� r. � �.'1i;�.+y++ .�y,.� : i3
�i:. , �;.,;� 1 ry' � �uaR�'�.,�' � � r
'vc
� �• � . �� f 1 � ��,�� a.i1"`y� � -s.N� '
i �� .��� ;; '�.� ��,, .a� ;� �'
� r'� '- - .
� aY �
'' • �� _ � ;' � t ��`� �
� �� � '� � ,�"� , �
fi f� � �,�_ •'�.r.� ` �� ��` r h�' 1
' � �` �� '
y�� �� .� ),� , �,'
s� ,� � -.Q ;,� !; w
�':`�_� ��'' � `i � �' �! ' ~� �
:� `�� �,�� �� �'a�. - r
�7 _".. �-0e�# � ���� '` r
.�'v � $7At _ � i � �;� � W
'� '� +�� .'�" 1� � � ' • � L�7
�.
� h, � � '��t' �" , + . : � `� $ ? Z
.
r , .
., , .:� w
, _ _ �.. �
_ �� T� � E, Q � O
� � E d
� � }_ �� t.:�. �
� . " ' . ' c� R *. t3�� � O
� T± u~1 C �.
.� r;.�
. � �.3 S�'. " ��ii� ` � ��t� i, � �
..� ` �.� �1� t � �� �� '�' � ��
a� �, j_ X '� { ��J � T 1
� � ti, � �� `J
. •� � � � .� — t�... ���Jo+t�` / �
;� r.. . �� F �� U
i � � . . �S� � , E� �^��� � �
- �'�` �� r� O
,1 �.. � • ' ���� � " � ��� � �
� �'�� ;� �' V ' ' `��.� W a�
�� ���� � �
, � �-��, � _ ,�_ `;,�� W �
�, � ,,,, �--� � H
1� ',?� y� ' Fr-1 �
� . +f � � �': . � �
r 4 1 �
`� ` `} _ ' , � U � O
- 4 �/
y Y z � /.
�1 ' _ _' O � � 4 W /�� � 1�y
t' ���.. Z W J � ~ Fy �
.. � � ti � W U � N N
� i�:. '�i�t ,� ..j ;..�'' W Y� d 4 K � . �, �
�..,1 ^`" � � '!,�t rL � K n � �< a �" ��
} ,I�j ��v w Ua o U^ g x �
44�% �N
`�� ^+` �'�'� Q� F� � �W W V 'C
' ~Fi . '�.�.i: � V Z W V i U 7� �
% N a Q N w �� d�D
v� � V a r
, '� �I i� � N N �� � � W
.. +.�:':.: .... ... . .. . ��� � Q m V 0 = W
�' �I--�
� ',�: .. _ _ . I�
' -. { � �.. . �� . O
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative No. 7 —Cluster Residential Development Alternative
This alternative includes the development of the project site as a clustered residential development of 490
units. Residential development would be clustered in each planning area. These residences would not in
regards to occupant age. This alternative also include private internal streets, open space and recreation
areas, equestrian and bicycle riding, and hiking trail linkages along East Santiago Canyon Road and
Santiago Creek. Project site geology would allow this alternative. No flood control improvement to
Santiago Creek would be provided in this alternative. Each of the Planning Areas would be graded to
allow residential development clustered out of flood hazard areas on elevated pads.
South of Santiago Creek
Planning Areas B, C, and D, located to the south of Santiago Creek, would be developed with open
space/recreational uses and clustered residential units. Access to these planning areas would be from East
Santiago Canyon Road in a manner similar to the proposed project. A total of approximately 60 acres are
located to the south of Santiago Creek and would support development. Open Space / Recreational uses
would be located on 63% of the land area (38 acres). Residential uses would be clustered on the
remaining approximately 37% of this land area (22 acres). A total of 365 units would be developed in
residential clusters at a net density of 16.6 dwelling units per acre and gross density of 6.1 dwelling units
per acre.
Planning Area B would be developed with active recreational uses similar to the proposed project. A total
of approximately 16 acres are located in Planning Area C of the development. Planning Area C would be
38% open space (6 acres) and 62% clustered residential units (10 acres). Planning Area C would be
developed with a total of 240 residential units clustered on approximately 10 acres at a net density of 24.0
dwelling units per acre and gross density of 15.0 dwelling units per acre. A total of approximately 34
acres are located in Planning Area C. Planning Area D would be 65% open space (22 acres) and 35%
clustered residential units (12 acres). Planning Area D would be developed with a total of 125 residential
units clustered on approximately 10 acres at a net density of 10.4 dwelling units per acre and gross
density of 3.7 dwelling units per acre. Table 7-7, Summary Cluster Residential Development Alternative
provides a statistical summary of the land uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-7, Cluster
Residential Development Alternative, depicts a schematic of potential land uses under this alternative.
North of Santiago Creek
Planning Areas A to the south of Santiago Creek would be developed with open space/recreational uses
and clustered residential units. Access to Planning Area A would be from the Mabury Avenue. A total of
approximately 50 acres are located to the north of Santiago Creek. Planning Area A would be 76% open
space (38 acres) and 24% clustered residential units (12 acres). Planning Area A would be developed
with a total of 125 residential units clustered on approximately 12 acres at a net density of 10.4 dwelling
units per acre and gross density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre.
Page 7-16 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
7.0 Alternatives
Table 7-7, Summary Cluster Residential Development Alternative provides a statistical summary of the
land uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-7, Cluster Residential Development Alternative, �� �
depicts a schematic of potential land uses under this alternative.
Table 7-7: Summary of Cluster Residential Development Alternative
Units/
Planning Alternative No. 7 , Gross Percent
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres of Site
Feet
A Cluster Residential Units and Vacant(85%)&Backfilling 125 50 acres 45%
Open Space/Recreation (15%) units
B Open Space/Recreation Backfilling(100%),& gl'ft 10 acres 9%
9•
C Cluster Residential Units and Backfilling(80%)&Other 240 16 acres 15%
Open Space/Recreation (20%) units
p Cluster Residential Units and Vacant(85%)&Materials 125 34 acres 31%
Open Space/Recreation Recycling(15%) units
Total 490 110 100%
units acres
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate, drive,parking, and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-17
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
�
� � �
. _.-.� z �
`f s �
.-,-^"'
i �� �� - � � �
� o � � �
i ,, � � m � � � �, �
� � m � _
� �
,; . � N@ � � � rT�
' i ( : V U � W h�l
`�1� { 4l� �Q 0�
� � � I � � � � � � F-+ �
J�� � � °� -O � > N U
f ; . (p = � �N � �
1+ � U � a � Z
� �1' � ,.... \. l5 ; ..
� \
� :�� !� �� �.
,�1
������ � �,s� ��� ��_ _``"-�-�� t
� '' �� ., 1
' `{ � /
�����
\���.��_ ��� - �
.-. � �
�
� � �� � ,
r', ..� � � � - �; � �
'� , �� U
�;, � �� ;; � � � - � E--�+
I� .j -'='`--- ���� , � �
I� 4��� � 1�` \$g�./ � { W
� � � � � � 1
� �,� ����i� i � � � �
�� �g�� ����_;� , ;'� � _ � w
, � , -� o z
� � � � � �� � � � _...�J
� � � � ��,� _ �_----_ ,� �
' o
m w
� � � o .>ii +� �♦� --�-" " w
t.. "N I� 1 , `% --` c
i. N S.,� � . .�.., � V �C � ,� I-1 O
� � `� �,fi� �,�.'� ' °�----� � � �, � W w �
� ''�� ���, a m4 � � �' �' �n
� � �' � ����� � � 4 �� @ � � � � �
;� U
J �ji- ... : U �Q' �Q � � �� ' \
i' l e� + � C m 0 � ry ID ` � � �
� � '`j�f � � � o N � � �
��i�� a � � ,Cy! a (� � �
i� � � H �
� � � � �
� ,� � ���., '� W w o
� � � ���`� '`� �� � E-� .��.,
�
_ _ � � 1�� td" � � ►—� � O
� o �, � � \ � � �
� � � : � ti. '�
� � � i�_/._ J. � � �
� �
�.;J,� .�. ���.Z �z
.��\� � �
� t� �a----9 � o
��� ��� - H �
� � � m � � �
r
� ���� � � �
�'�� ��•� k_� m .� � �
\� Qm �
` �
�� , � m o
�, \=�---�'1 �� � �
��. a Q c�
� x
r �;j
U
�
�
O
�
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative No. 8 - Residential Development Alternative
This alternative includes the development of the project site as a single-family residential development.
All residential development would be located south of Santiago Creek in Planning Areas C and D. The
project site was previously the subject of a proposed residential development known as the Sully-
Miller/Fieldstone Communities project (the "Fieldstone ProjecY'). In October 2003, the City Council
approved the Fieldstone Project and, certified its EIR. Shortly after these approvals, a sufficient number
of registered voters in the City signed petitions to qualify a referendum to overturn the City Council's
approval of the Fieldstone Project General Plan Amendment (GPA). The City Council then elected to
rescind approval of the GPA. Although previously rescinded by the City Council, this alternative was
analyzed to ensure and foster informed decision making and public participation as required by CEQA
Guidelines Section 15126.6(a). Additionally, this alternative would not provide for the development of
Planning Area A with single-family residential development.
This alternative would include private internal streets, open space and recreation areas, equestrian and
bicycle riding, and hiking trail linkages along East Santiago Canyon Road and Santiago Creek. Project
site geology would allow this alternative. Flood control improvement to Santiago Creek would be
provided in this alternative similar to the proposed project. Planning Areas C and D would be graded to
allow residential development. This alternative would include development of the project site as a gated
residential community with a maximum of 196 single-family homes. The minimum lot size would be
6,000 square feet. These residences would not in regards to occupant age.
Table 7-8, Summary Residential Development Alternative, provides a statistical summary of the land uses
anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-8, Residential Development Alternative, depicts a schematic
of potential land uses under this alternative.
Table 7-8: Summary Residential Development Alternative
Units/
Planning Alternative No. 8 � Gross Percent
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres of Site
Feet
A Natural Open Space Vacant(85%)&Backfilling 0 50 acres 45%
(15%)
Active Recreational(i.e.,pool,
B driving range,tennis,putting Backfilling(100%) 0 10 acres 9%
green, soccer fields, and
baseball)
C Residential Units and Open Backfilling(80%)&Other 66 units 16 acres 15%
Space/Recreation (20%)
Residential Units and Open Vacant(85%)&Materials 130
D Space/Recreation Recycling(15%) units 34 acres 31%
196 110 0
Total units acres 100/o
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate, drive,parking, and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-19
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
00
..�..�` @ Z� �
� �� .� �� � �
� IV � � � vJ 3 Ir--r��
' 1-�i��- � m � � �� `� �
� � '�.� �� °'
�� �,�" � Q � W (�,
( fl �� �: � Eo � M �
1Ji %.__.�J cii �� � c�
f �11 � / -� � � �, `° T V� �
` J r;�-�� �.. _ � � ' � z
► ,
��� V �` � 7TT �
_� r• ' � . T�'—,—T-
` ��,'�-��--�''S'. g��0°�� I ( I I � i j I !�
� �� � � j'�a ._1__L.-1--1-..1��.. ! ,
\ �. ..�--- �
����
� /
��1 %`�,(����` ,��
�� �� �
`��,� ;�, ;� �— � � � W
� �, \ � � _ �
,� _ A i �
, � �� ��-z ��� l. !
���� . �
,�-_ � � ��, � � �
����-� l � �
� „ � ,--� � �i ,
�- \ , � � W
; ''�� � - � r— ' i c�
� � �
�`, � \��� z
`� � II W
� 'r� �- :
1�,,, ;�.�— � �—' �
1 �� a✓Y►Y N�7 � � O
j���-��= — o ��� �
Q N � r f�rrt �r, TT � ' � � w
�'� ' ai� � � O
� � Q u, � !'� 7�.S..J�.. I � v � �, E
Q � � �`\`;--�� � � o � � o � �n � �
c' � Q ��+' i i�� � � � Q � '� m � � i-�-+
1 �� N � ��l,, �� , �.�1 0 �,,�o � Q W U
� � S�� .� �� � � � � � �
a � �1'� I �-t___�_...1� i �
��',[� ���. '� �' � �� � � U
�`� � . � �
.�—� �
O
���`���� � `�� � '` ►-1 0
,� r-� ,� ,�,
, , � . , , �
�,�Y . ���� �-. w �,
1 ,
I ;,r .�( :. , � O
�' �'-"= w (�
, � � �
i�1��`� � �� Q �
� Z
�C�; �,. ` ��`��. � �
\�— ' �, �—, v�
� `��\ r�----� _ � � p
` \\� m � �--+ �i
�' �\ � � O N
\,\ .� a � U 1"'1
�f�` �� m V Q
O �
��, r � � �
1 �
�\`\�� � � � �
} � �
� W
C.�
�
�
�
�
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative 9: Off-Site Development Alternative
This alternative evaluates the development of the project for similar use at an off-site location. An off-
site location was considered pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(a),which requires description
of a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project. For the purposes of
this Draft EIR only, the existing City Yorba Park site, adjacent properties owned by the Orange Unified
School District (OUSD) and YMCA, and the adjacent Santiago Creek area were selected as the off-site
location. This alternative is located generally to the east of Interstate-55 (I-55), to the south of East
Chapman Avenue,to the west of South Yorba Avenue, and to the north of Palmyra Avenue in the City.
The alternative site location is presently utilized as Yorba Park, the OSUD Community Day School, and
the Orange YMCA. The northern approximate one-half of the Orange YMCA property is occupied by a
dirt bicycle motocross (BMX) track and the southern approximate one-half is occupied by the Orange
YMCA facility. A portion of Santiago Creek and the Santiago Creek Bike Trail, a City facility, passes
through this alternative site. Surrounding uses include: Interstate Highway-55 to the west; the St. Joseph
Heritage Urgent Care complex across East Chapman Avenue to the north; commercial development and
single-family residences to the east across South Yorba Avenue; and, single-family residences to the
south across Palmyra Avenue. The Off-Site Development Alternative site includes the former
Yorba/Chapman LandfilUDisposal Station #12 and the La Veta #2 Burn Dump/Refuse Disposal Station
#2 as named by the Orange County Waste and Recycling Division, and as described below. Figure 7-9,
Off-Site Development Alternative, depicts the location of the landfills.
Yorba/Chapman Landfill/Disposal Station#12
The YorbalChapman Landfill/Disposal Station #12 is located directly northeast of the former La Veta #2
and is bound by East Chapman Avenue to the north, South Yorba Street to the west, Santiago Creek to the
east, and the OUSD property to the south. The Yorba/Chapman LandfilUDisposal Station#12 is currently
the City's Yorba Park. Prior to December 9, 1956, the Yorba/Chapman LandfilUDisposal Station #12
was operated as a gravel and sand mine by the California Rock Company. By January of 1957, the
County began using the Yarba/Chapman Landfill/Disposal Station #12 site as sanitary landfill.
Yorba/Chapman Landfill/Disposal Station #12 site was closed on May 11, 1960, and in 1967 the City
designated the YorbalChapmen LandfilUDisposal Station #12 site as a park. Waste occurs at depths of 1
to 3.5 feet below existing grade extending to depths between 28 and 41 feet below grade. Waste materials
include glass, paper, metal fragments, leaves, wood, concrete, lumber, brick, asphalt, concrete, plastic,
yard waste, wire, cloth, and newspaper. No burn waste reportedly was disposed of at the
Landfill/Disposal Station#12 site.
La Veta #2 Burn Dump/Refuse Disposal Station #2
The overall site, La Veta #2 Burn Dump/Refuse Disposal Station #2, was used by Consolidated Rock
Products as a sand and gravel mine and from 1946 to 1956. It was operated as a municipal solid waste
disposal site by the County. During the late 1940s and early 1950s excavation and land filling activities
were performed in the northern portion of the YMCA property (BMX track, buildings, and most of
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-21
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
parking lot) and in the mid-1950s were performed in the southern portion of the YMCA property (soccer
field and volleyball court). Disposal operations ceased in 1956 and the La Veta Site #2 was closed in "
accordance with standards at that time. The California lntegrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB)
classifies the La Veta Site #2 as a closed solid waste disposal site. Types of waste materials disposed
included green waste, construction debris, and municipal solid waste. Waste was burned at the La Veta
Site #2 in order to reduce volume until 1953, when disposal operations were changed to cut-and-cover
practices.
Project Sife Development
Under this alternative, the project site would be developed for uses permitted under the City's existing
General Plan and Zoning. Refer to Alternative 2: No Project Alternative—Development Under Existing
General Plan and Zoning discussed above. Table 7-2, Summary of No Project Alternative—Development
Under Existing General Plan and Zoning, provides a statistical summary of the land uses anticipated
under Alternative 2: No Project Alternative — Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning.
Figure 7-2, No Project Alternative — Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning, depicts a
schematic of the land use under Alternative 2: No Project Alternative — Development Under Existing
General Plan and Zoning.
Off-Site Location Development
Under this alternative, development at this off-site location would include all project uses with the
exception of the Planning Area A uses of Natural Open Space (50 acres) and the Planning Area B uses of
Active Recreational (10 acres). The off-site location is approximately 28.8 acres and therefore, is not of
sufficient size to accommodate these uses. Planning Area C and Planning Area D uses of Age-Restricted
and Single-Family Residential would be able to be accommodated. However, they would be anticipated
to be developed at increased densities. Table 7-9, Summary of Off-Site Development Alternative provides
a statistical summary of the land uses anticipated under this alternative. Figure 7-9, Off-Site Development
Alternative, depicts a schematic of potential land uses under this alternative.
Page 7-22 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
7.0 Alternatives
Table 7-9: Summary of Off-Site Location Alternative
Planning Alternative No. 9 � Units/ Gross Percent
Area Land Use Existing Land Use Square Acres of Site
Feet
Pro'ect Site
Residential 17 units 12 acres 11%
'�' Resource Area Vacant(85%)&Backfilling(15%)
0 38 acres 35%
Open Space
B Resource Area Backfilling(100%) 0 10 9%
C Resource Area Backfillin (80%)&Other (20%) 0 16 15%
D Resource Area Vacant(85%)&Materials Recycling 0 34 31%
(15%)
Total 17 units 110 acres 100%
Off-Site Location
A O en S ace Santia o Creek 0 7.0 24%
B Age-Qualified yorba Park,YMCA, &OUSD 265 units 9.1 32%
Residences
C Single-Family yorba Park,YMCA, &OUSD 130 units 12.7 44%
Residences
Total 395 28•8 100%
units acres
1. Existing land use percentages are estimates only.
2. Other includes project entrance gate,drive,parking,and staging.
Source:KTGY Group, September 2012.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-23
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
E Chapman Ave
.�--- -
/��_-_ -- /
I
� �
� I,
� I Planning Area`B"
Age Qualified Residential
� 9.1 Acres
Assisted Living: 50 DU
� Independant Living:215 DU
� � Total Units: 265 DU(Maximum)
� �_,�t•?�.1�; -r
F ���" �
:�;��,��,.�,�,�;�
Santiago Creek ; (
� 7.0 Acres �
� �
i p �_.___r-i______�._____r--1.,�..� v� `
r .. o
Entry Road �
. �-�� j----�-._-�"( --�-�-1-� �----�-- 1 � �
.� � � .
. �
_ . �-r----1-- �� ,
�
� �� � . • � Planning Area°C'
, � Single Family Residential
12.7 Acres
�' -�� j ____�_�_� ....j,.— Lot Size: 50'x 50'
Total Units: 130 DU(Maximum)
.. �j__ _
. � 7` i
.�� ..:, . �
-. . � .+ .
_. � f ��- � � . T . . .�`�fi�l ���i�
`- �_� � �_...i� L i i J 1.
� �^` Palmyra Ave � �
�•
. �
� ' � �
.'1��
1
Total Acres: 28.8 AC
SOURCE: KTGY.
VISTA N
OFF-SITE ALTERNATIVE No-S�
RIO SANTIAGO PROJECT - CITY OF ORANGE FIGURE 7-9
7.0 Alternatives
7.1.3 Conclusion Summaries
The following summarizes each alternative based on the results of the below Table 7-10 Impact Summary
Comparison of Project Alternatives, Table 7-11, Project Objectives Feasibility Comparison, and Table 7-
12, Alternative Impact Summary Comparison. None of the alternatives would eliminate all of the
significant and unavoidable impacts of the proposed project including the No Project - No Development
Alternative.
Alternative 1: No Project Alternative—No Development
The No Project - No Development Alternative would result in greater impacts to land use and planning.
Under this alternative the project site would continue to be fenced and public access restricted. Project
proposed public access to portions of the project site would not occur. The uses are not reflective of the
residential character of the surrounding community. This would be an increased impact to land use and
planning from the proposed project. Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project
Alternatives, and Table 7-12,Alternative Impact Summary Comparison.
The No Project - No Development Alternative would not feasibly achieve most (zero of twelve) of the
basic project objectives. However, this alternative remains under consideration as it would avoid or
substantially lessen significant effects identified in the analysis of the proposed project. Refer to Table 7-
11,Project Objectives Feasibiliry, for specific information on each project objective.
Alternative 2: No Project Alternative— Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning
The No Project - Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning Alternative would result in
greater impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, land use and planning, and noise.
Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives, and Table 7-12, Alternative
Impact Summary Comparison. Related to aesthetics, under this alternative the long-term visual impacts
from all Planning Areas would be increased from the proposed project with uses permitted within the RA
(Resource Area) City General Plan designation (i.e., materials recycling). Additionally, light and glare
would be introduced from the residential uses in Planning Area A.
Related to biology, under this alternative land use permitted within the RA (Resource Area) City General
Plan designation(i.e., materials recycling)could occur in Planning Areas A, B, C and D. The introduction
of these land uses in close proximity to biological resources could increase project impacts. Additionally,
Alternative 2 would provide for residential land uses in Planning Area A. These residential uses would
potentially create biological impacts avoided by the proposed projects O-S (Open Space) designation of
Planning Area A.
Additionally, Alternative 2 would provide for residential land uses in Planning Area A. These residential
uses would potentially create cultural resource impacts avoided by the proposed projects O-S (Open
Space) designation of Planning Area A. Related to land use, under this alternative land use permitted
within the RA (Resource Area) City General Plan designation (i.e., materials recycling) could occur in
Planning Areas A, B, C and D. Future on-site residential land use would be physically divided from
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-25
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
residential land uses to the south of Santiago Creek. Related to noise, this alternative could potentially
increase noises impacts on the adjacent residential areas by the introduction of uses permitted in the RA �
designation or SG zoning district. Therefore,this alternative would potentially have increased Least Bell's
and other biological vireo impacts; increased/greater impacts related to land use and planning; and,
potential noise impacts on adjacent residential areas.
According to Appendix N, Traffic Impact Analysis, trips generated by the existing uses are approximately
591 daily trips, 63 a.m. peak hour trips(34 inbound and 29 outbound), and four p.m. peak hour trips(four
inbound and zero outbound). When compared to the proposed project, this alternative would generate
3,666 less daily trips, 213 less a.m. peak hour trips, and 365 less p.m. peak hour trips. Traffic impacts
would be the same as the baseline traffic condition. Refer to Table 7-10,Impact Summary Comparison of
ProjectAlternatives, and Table 7-12,Alternative Impact Summary Comparison.
The No Project - Development Under Existing General Plan and Zoning Alternative would not feasibly
achieve most (one of twelve) of the basic project objectives. However, this alternative remains under
consideration as it would avoid or substantially lessen significant effects identified in the analysis of the
proposed project. Refer to Table 7-11, Project Objectives Feasibility, for specific infarmation on each
project objective.
Alternative 3: Mixed Use Development Alternative — Open Space, Recreation, Commercial,
and Residential
Mixed Use Development - Open Space, Recreation, Commercial, and Residential Alternative would
result in increased/greater local and avoided/reduced regional impacts to transportation and traffic.
Related to transportation and traffic impacts, this alternative would have the increased/greater local
transportation and traffic impacts related to the generation of trips by on-site uses (i.e., commercial uses).
However, this alternative would be anticipated to reduce the length of trips from the surrounding
neighborhoods to commercial uses outside of the local vicinity (Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis).
Therefore, transportation and traffic impacts would be reduced by this alternative. Alternative 3 would
result in an increase in noise levels associated with the commercial development.
According to Appendix N, Ti-affic Impact Analysis, trips generated by this alternative are approximately
10,209 daily trips, 353 a.m. peak hour trips (204 inbound and 149 outbound), and 903 p.m. peak hour
trips (448 inbound and 454 outbound). When compared to the proposed project, this alternative would
generate 5,952 (58 percent) more daily trips, 77 (22 percent) more a.m. peak hour trips, and 534 (59
percent) more p.m. peak hour trips. The trips generated by the uses in Planning Areas A and B would be
the same as the proposed project. The trips generated by the retail commercial uses in Planning Area C
would be greater than the proposed project. However, it should be noted that the length and number
(neither quantifiable)would be reduced in the overall community. There are no existing or planned retail
commercial facilities in the overall community. The trips generated by the age-qualified uses in Planning
Area D would be greater than the proposed project. Traffic impacts would be greater than the proposed
project. Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives, and Table 7-12,
Alternative Impact Summary Comparison.
Page 7-26 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
7.0 Alternatives
Mixed Use Development - Open Space, Recreation, Commercial, and Residential Alternative would
achieve nine of the twelve basic project objectives. Therefore, this alternative remains under
� consideration. Refer to Table 7-11, Project Objectives Feasibility, for specific information on each
project objective.
Alternative 4: Mixed Use Development Alternative—Open Space, Recreation, and Storage
Mixed Use Development- Open Space, Recreation, and Storage Alternative would have increased/greater
impacts than the proposed project related to aesthetics and cultural resources. Increased light and glare
aesthetic impacts would occur from the additional sports fields and tennis courts in Planning Areas A and
B. Additionally, Alternative 4 would provide for residential land uses in Planning Area A. These
residential uses would potentially create cultural resource impacts avoided by the proposed projects O-S
(Open Space) designation of Planning Area A. This alternative would avoid/reduce project impacts
related to geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, public
services, and Transportation and Traffic. According to Appendix N, Traffic Impact Analysis, trips
generated by this alternative are approximately 3,852 daily trips, 227 a.m. peak hour trips (135 inbound
and 93 outbound), and 444 p.m. peak hour trips(243 inbound and 201 outbound). When compared to the
proposed project, this alternative would generate 405 less daily trips, 49 less a.m. peak hour trips, and 75
(17 percent) more p.m. peak hour trips. The alternative would change the timing of traffic impacts.
Traffic impacts would be less than the proposed project for the a.m. peak hour conditions; however,
traffic impacts would be greater in the p.m. peak hour condition. Traffic impacts would be less than the
proposed project for the daily. Since the total daily trips generated would be less that the proposed
project,traffic impacts would be less than the proposed project.
Air quality and cultural impacts would be increased from the proposed project with grading activity in
Planning Area A. Biological resource (least Bell's vireo and regulated trees) impacts would be
anticipated to be increased from the additional soccer and park facilities. Noise impacts would be
increased from the proposed project with additional recreational activities in Planning Areas A, C, and D.
Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives, and Table 7-12, Alternative
Impact Summary Comparison.
Mixed Use Development - Open Space, Recreation, and Storage Alternative would achieve six of twelve
basic project objectives. Therefore, this alternative remains under consideration. Refer to Table 7-11,
Project Objectives Feasibility, for specific information on each project objective.
Alternative No. 5—All Recreation Alternative
The All Recreation Alternative would result in result in increased/greater impacts than the proposed
project to aesthetics, cultural resources, and noise. Recreational uses on the north side of Santiago Creek
would impact the adjacent residential areas. Related to noise impacts, while this alternative would not
have an interior noise impact, development under this alternative could potentially increase noises
impacts on the adjacent residential areas by the introduction of recreational use. Increased light and glare
aesthetic impacts would occur from the additional sports fields and tennis courts in Planning Areas A.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-27
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
Additionally, Alternative 5 would provide for residential land uses in Planning Area A. These residential
uses would potentially create cultural resource impacts avoided by the proposed projects O-S (Open
Space) designation of Planning Area A. Biological resource (least Bell's vireo and regulated trees)
impacts would be anticipated to be increased from the additional soccer and park facilities.
According to Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis, trips generated by this alternative are approximately
1,723 daily trips, 48 a.m. peak hour trips (24 inbound and 24 outbound), and 449 p.m. peak hour trips
(303 inbound and 146 outbound). When compared to the proposed project, this alternative would
generate 2,534 less daily trips, 228 less a.m. peak hour trips, and 80 (18 percent) more p.m. peak hour
trips. The alternative would change the timing of traffic impacts. Traffic impacts would be less than the
proposed project for the a.m. peak hour conditions; however, traffic impacts would be greater in the p.m.
peak hour condition. Traffic impacts would be less than the proposed project for the daily. Since the total
daily trips generated would be less that the proposed project, traffic impacts would be less than the
proposed project. Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives, and Table
7-12,Alternative Impact Summary Comparison.
The All Recreation Alternative would achieve six of twelve basic project objectives. Therefare, this
alternative remains under consideration. Refer to Table 7-1 l, Project Objectives Feasibiliry, for specific
information on each project objective.
Alternative No. 6— Mixed Use Development Alternative :
The Mixed Use Development Alternative would result in increased/greater impacts than the proposed
project to aesthetics, cultural resources, and noise. Increased light and glare aesthetic impacts would
occur from the additional sports fields and tennis courts in Planning Areas A. Additionally, Alternative 6
would provide for residential land uses in Planning Area A. These residential uses would potentially
create cultural resource impacts avoided by the proposed projects O-S (Open Space) designation of
Planning Area A. Related to noise impacts,while this alternative would not have an interiar noise impact,
development under this alternative could potentially increase noises impacts on the adjacent residential
areas by the introduction of recreational use including equestrian facilities.
According to Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis, trips generated by this alternative are approximately
2,802 daily trips, 164 a.m. peak hour trips (92 inbound and 72 outbound), and 334 p.m. peak hour trips
(190 inbound and 144 outbound). When compared to the proposed project, this alternative would
generate 1,455 less daily trips, 112 less a.m. peak hour trips, and 35 less p.m. peak hour trips. Traffic
impacts would be less than the proposed project. Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of
Project Alternatives, and Table 7-12,Alternative Impact Summary Comparison.
The Mixed Use Development Alternative would achieve four of twelve basic project objectives.
Therefore, this alternative remains under consideration. Refer to Table 7-11, Project Objectives
Feasibiliry, for specific information on each project objective. -
Page 7-28 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
7.0 Alternatives
Alternative No. 7—Cluster Residential Development Alternative
The Cluster Residential Development Alternative would result in result in increased/greater impacts than
the propose project to: cultural resources, public services— schools, parks, other services, and recreation;
recreation; and transportation and traffic. Light and glare aesthetic impacts would occur from the
additional sports fields and tennis courts. Air quality impacts related to NOx and PM10 would occur with
this alternative. Additionally, Alternative 7would provide for residential land uses in Planning Area A.
These residential uses would potentially create cultural resource impacts avoided by the proposed projects
O-S (Open Space)designation of Planning Area A.
This alternative would avoid ar reduce aesthetic impacts as follows: Planning Area D (short-term visual);
Planning Area B, C, and D (long-term visual); biological resources (least Bell's vireo); biological
resources (southern cottonwood — willow riparian forest); biological resources (raptor and songbird
nests).
According to Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis, trips generated by this alternative are approximately
5,178 daily trips, 371 a.m. peak hour trips (127 inbound and 244 outbound), and 466 p.m. peak hour trips
(274 inbound and 192 outbound). When compared to the proposed project, this alternative would
generate 921 (18 percent) more daily trips, 95 (26 percent)more a.m. peak hour trips, and 97 (21 percent)
more p.m. peak hour trips. Traffic impacts would be more than the proposed project. Refer to Table 7-
10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives, and Table 7-12, Alternative Impact Summary
Comparison.
The Cluster Residential Development Alternative would achieve nine of twelve basic project objectives.
Therefore, this alternative remains under consideration. Refer to Table 7-11, Project Objective
Feasibility, for specific information on each project objective.
Alternative No. 8 -Residential Development Alternative
The All Residential Alternative would not result in increased/greater impacts than the proposed project.
This alternative would avoid/reduce project impacts related to aesthetics, population and housing, public
services, and transportation and traffic.
According to Appendix N, Tra�c Impact Analysis, trips generated by this alternative are approximately
1,876 daily trips, 147 a.m. peak hour trips (37 inbound and 110 outbound), and 198 p.m. peak hour trips
(125 inbound and 73 outbound). When compared to the proposed project,this alternative would generate
2,381 (127 percent) less daily trips, 129 (88 percent) less a.m. peak hour trips, and 171 (86 percent) less
p.m. peak hour trips. Traffic impacts would be less than the proposed project for the daily, a.m., and p.m.
peak hour conditions.
Public services — school impacts would be increased from the proposed project with the introduction of
single-family residences in Planning Area C. All other impacts would be the same or similar to the
proposed project. Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives, and Table
7-12,Alternative Impact Summary Comparison.
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-29
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
The All Residential Alternative would achieve eight of twelve basic project objectives. Therefore, this
alternative remains under consideration. Refer to Table 7-11, Project Objectives Feasibiliry, for specific
information on each project objective.
Alternative 9: Off-Site Development Alternative
The following impact analysis of Alternative 9: Off-Site Development Alternative has been separated
into three sections: (1)Alternative Site Location; (2)Project Site Location; and,(3) Combined Impact.
Alternative Site Location
The same number of residential units is proposed at the alternative site location. The alternative site was
previously utilized for mineral resource extraction. After mineral resources, were depleted the alternative
site was utilized for multiple uses including recreation, school, and community facilities. The residential
development at the alternative site location could potentially have aesthetic, air quality, biological
resource, and cultural resource impacts at the off-site location. Table 7-12, Alternative Impact Summary
Comparison, provides a comparison of the impacts of the proposed project to each alternative arranged by
topical environmental issue area. The residential development at the alternative site location could
potentially have significant hazardous impacts. The alternative site location has two previous landfill
areas. Development of the alternative site location with residential development would require removal
and disposal of the materials contained within these landfill areas. The residential development at the
alternative site location would not be consistent with the General Plan land use designations for the - .
alternative site location and would not be in substantial compliance with Land Use Element Goals and
Policies. A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change similar to the proposed project would be required
and would result in compliance. The residential development at the alternative site location would
potentially have park impacts the same as or similar to the proposed project because same number of
residential units is proposed at the alternative site location. However, the alternative site contains the
City's Yorba Park. This alternative would eliminate this park. Therefore, residential development at the
alternative site location would have increased or greater park impacts than the proposed project.
Agricultural resource impacts would be same as the proposed project under this alternative. The
residential development at the alternative site location would potentially have population and housing,
and greenhouse gas emissions impacts as the same as or similar to the proposed project. The residential
development at the alternative site location would not be anticipated to have geology and soils, and
mineral resources impacts. The residential development at the alternative site location would potentially
have police protection impacts less than the proposed project. The residential development at the
alternative site location would potentially have school impacts the same as or similar to the proposed
project. The same number of residential units is proposed at the alternative site location. Based on the
data provided in Appendix N, Traffic Impact Analysis (page 75), the residential development at the
alternative site location would potentially have traffic impacts the same as or similar to the proposed
project. The residential development at the alternative site location would potentially have utilities and
service systems impacts the same as or similar to the proposed project.
Page 7-30 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
7.0 Alternatives
The residential development at the alternative site location would potentially have fire protection impacts
less than the proposed project because the alternative site location is not anticipated to be a high fire
hazard area and is more accessible generally than the proposed project.
Project Site
Related to aesthetics, under this alternative the long-term visual impacts from all Planning Areas could be
increased from the proposed project with uses permitted or conditionally permitted within the RA
(Resource Area) City General Plan designation (i.e., CUP materials recycling). Additionally, light and
glare would be introduced from the residential uses in Planning Area A. This alternative would be
consistent with the General Plan land use designations for the project site and would be in substantial
compliance with Land Use Element Goals and Policies. Related to land use, under this alternative land
use permitted within the RA (Resource Area) City General Plan designation (i.e., CUP materials
recycling) could occur in Planning Areas B, C, D, and a portion of Planning Area A. Related to biology,
under this alternative land use permitted within the RA (Resource Area) City General Plan designation
(i.e., CUP materials recycling)could occur in Planning Areas B, C,D, and a portion of Planning Area A.
The introduction of these land uses in close proximity to biological resources would be anticipated to
increase project impacts. Additionally, Alternative 2 would provide for residential land uses in Planning
Area A. These residential uses would potentially create biological impacts avoided by the proposed
projects O-S (Open Space) designation of Planning Area A. Related to noise, this alternative could
potentially increase noises impacts on the adjacent residential areas by the introduction of uses permitted
in the RA designation or SG zoning district. Therefore, this alternative would potentially have increased
Least Bell's and other biological vireo impacts; increased/greater impacts related to land use and
planning; and, potential noise impacts on adjacent residential areas.
Agricultural resource impacts would be the same as the proposed project under this alternative.
Under this alternative there would be fewer residential units at the project site than the proposed project
[i.e., 17 units (Planning Area A) vs. proposed project 396 units] a population increase at the project site
would occur with this alternative. However, it would be a reduction in population from that anticipated
from the proposed project. Public service impacts related to fire protection and emergency medical
services would be less than significant with the proposed project. Public service impacts related to police
protection services, schools, parks, and other facilities would be less than significant with the proposed
project. They would be reduced by this alternative at the project site.
Based on the data provided in Appendix N, Traffic Impact Analysis (page 75), this alternative would be
anticipated to reduce this impact at the project site. Based on this alternative utilities and services would
be reduced at the project site.
City of Orange-Draft E/R—May 2013 Page 7-31
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
Combined Impact
This alternative includes development at the project site and the alternative site location. Therefore, the ��
alternative is evaluated based upon an overall potential worse case condition, which includes the
combination of impacts at both sites.
The Alternative Site Location Alternative would result in greater impacts to aesthetics, air quality,
biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, land
use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, and transportation and
traffic. Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives, and Table 7-12,
Alternative Impact Summary Comparison for detailed explanation of analysis.
This alternative including trips from the project site and the alternative site location would generate 885
less daily trips, 42 less a.m. peak hour trips, and 56 less p.m. peak hour trips. Traffic impacts would be
less than the proposed project. Refer to Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project
Alternatives, and Table 7-12, Alternative Impact Summary Comparison. Therefore, while project site
impacts would be reduced, alternative site impacts would be introduced. This alternative would have a
slightly greater or increased traffic impact than the proposed project.
Impacts related to utilities and service systems would be less than significant with the proposed project.
As noted above in the analysis of Alternative 2, No Project Development Under the Existing General
Plan and Zoning, the project site impacts related to utilities and service systems would be reduced by this ,
alternative. Therefore, while project site impacts would be reduced, alternative site impacts would be
introduced. The combination of the impacts from the two locations would cause this alternative to have a
slightly greater or increased utilities and service systems impact than the proposed project.
As noted above in the analysis of Alternative 2, No Project Development Under the Existing General
Plan and Zoning, the project site impacts related to aesthetics — light and glare in Planning Areas B, C,
and D from the proposed project would be avoided or reduced. However, additional, impacts would
occur at the alternative location. The combination of the impacts from the two locations would cause this
alternative to have a slightly greater or increased aesthetics impact than the proposed project. Cultural
resource, project site project site geology and soils, and hazards and hazardous materials impacts would
be avoided or reduced.
The Alternative Site Location would not feasibly achieve most (two of twelve); however, could
potentially achieve one other basic project objectives. However, this alternative remains under
consideration as it would avoid or substantially lessen significant effects identified in the analysis of the
proposed project.
The Alternative Site Location would not feasibly achieve most (two of twelve); however, could
potentially achieve one other basic project objectives. However, this alternative remains under
consideration as it would avoid or substantially lessen significant effects identified in the analysis of the �
Page 7-32 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
7.0 Alternatives
proposed project. Refer to Table 7-ll, Project Objectives Feasibiliry, for specific information on each
project objective.
7.1.4 Environmental Superior Alternative
The CEQA Guidelines [Section 15126.6(a) and (e)(2)] require that an EIR's analysis of alternatives
identify the "environmentally superior alternative" among all of those considered. In addition, if the No
Project Alternative is identified as the environmentally superior alternative, then the EIR must also
identify the environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. Under CEQA, the goal of
identifying the environmentally superior alternative is to assist decision-makers in considering project
approvaL CEQA does not require an agency to select the environmentally superior alternative (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15042-15043).
Based on the analysis contained in this section,the Environmentally Superior Alternative is Alternative 1:
No Project — No Development. Among the remaining alternatives, Alternative 8: Residential
Development Alternative is considered the Environmentally Superior Alternative for the reasons outlined
below.
Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternative, provides a summary of each alternative
related to the environmental issues previously evaluated with respect to the proposed project. Alternative
2: Development Under the Existing General Plan and Zoning Alternative avoids/reduces the greatest
number of project specific impacts (19 project specific impacts) and would avoid eight project specific
unavoidable impact. However, Alternative 2 would increase two project specific significant unavoidable
impacts and would increase 13 project specific impacts. Alternative 4: Mixed Use Development
Alternative — Open Space, Recreation, and Storage Alternative avoids/reduces several project specific
impacts (14 project specific impacts) and would avoid six project specific unavoidable impact. However,
Alternative 4 would increase three project specific significant unavoidable impacts and would increase
ten project specific impacts. Alternative 8: All Residential Alternative would reduce project specific
impacts (12 project specific impacts) and would avoid six project specific unavoidable impact. While
Alternative 8 would avoid/reduce fewer project specific impacts, Alternative 8: All Residential
Alternative would only increase one project specific impact. Therefore, for the purposes of this Draft EIR
Alternative 8: Residential Development Alternative would be considered the Environmentally Superior
Alternative.
7.2 Project Alternative Comparative Summary
Table 7-10, Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternative, provides a summary of each alternative
related to the environmental issues previously evaluated with respect to the proposed project. Table 7-10,
Impact Summary Comparison of Project Alternative, includes the level of significance associated with the
proposed project in order to evaluate each alternative's potential to eliminate or reduce the potential
significant impacts of the proposed project, as well as to provide a comparative evaluation of the potential
impacts of each of the alternatives. This comparison assumes the post-mitigation condition of the
proposed project and that the same feasible mitigation measures and project reyuirements are available
City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013 Page 7-33
Rio Santiago Project SCH No. 2009051072
7.0 Alternatives
and able to be implemented for each alternative. Section 5, Environmental Analysis, of this Draft EIR
contains a detailed discussion of each environmental issue.
7.3 Project Objective Feasibility Summary
The State CEQA Guidelines require EIRs to describe a range of alternatives to the proposed project, or to
the location of the proposed project, which would feasibly achieve most of the basic project objectives,
but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects identified in the analysis. While
there is no requirement in CEQA that the alternatives selected must satisfy every key objective of the
project, a project alternative which cannot reasonably attain the basic objectives of the proposed project
must be eliminated from consideration. Table 7-11, Project Objectives Feasibility Comparison, provides
an assessment of the ability of each of the alternatives to achieve the basic objectives identified in Section
33, Project Objectives, of this Draft EIR. The objectives are repeated in this table for clarity and ease of
reference.
7.4 Proposed Project Impact and Alternatives Summary By Topical Environmental
Table 7-12, Alternative Impact Summary Comparison, provides a comparison of the impacts of the
proposed project to each alternative arranged by topical environmental issue area.
Page 7-34 City of Orange-Draft EIR—May 2013
SCH No. 2009051072 Rio Santiago Project
_
�`-' ~� -� � � � z � r x x x c� n � � � o� � � w �o a a a a a � a a a
�� � � O' � T3 O � 7 p„ N N (P O C C C Q' p' �' p' `p' �=t ^+� � v�i v�i v�i v�i v�i r�n
�° �' �• �• �• C o :; °- o �' �' � o c c c o o` o 0 0 �O �O �' � 5- :� � � �
�O ?; w C fl- o- �' cro w �, y cro ao aa vo ao c c c co rR r° cv r° :»
� cn cn v� cn — �, o` v� v, a � �. �. _. �• �• �• �• �• w w — '» '»
p � < < < < � � w � � � � � � � � � p'_ � � P'_ �' �' � vni �ni, r�'i, vni v�', vr',
� A� �' � P� ¢• 0.
�� �� �� �� �� o 0 0. o � °' o 0 0 � � � � � :� 7� ry �o 'v �v 'b �o
� v, v, v� �n a' � .d 0. x .� � C/� G G C v� v� v� v� v, Z cp
o -� -� -� o 0 0 0 0 � p � w w a� w w w
n O 'l7 C/] 'TJ '17 O v, ,7 � A� Gv �J N ct (t co -s ^s R � -� " k C '�7 '� '� � 7 �
�' P� () O C � � O.. O. �n rn v� c� (� c i f) () O A� -� �
m � O n ry � ',� � � � �' 'S "C3 � ^ v�i v�i v�i v�i � d � UQ OQ UQ CfQ OQ (IQ �
�7 0 �o � � ,p m •� o. � c�—`o �' c"o m c o cc � C �
� w � � � w o w ao �a �. c � p � � � � � � �
� .-- w w N � '� o = $ � � � � n w m w a� m m
� `� ? •`; � ° o � � � `; � N C� Cd y CO C7 D �
o` � 'v�
o d �' �' m � �' o. o, ° � � O o o n � s �.
w � ° m w o `� w ° < o o � o o p
:� B � '� CD � � o -;. r., ao ao � � �
m m o vCD, � tra � � � o � � d
� o co co `� `� �
� � =D � °c � � o � v�o '' '� r' =; �; N
a. �' �' _ � n. � o w � � o B 9 �
w ac �, � `�° � � °' °' cyo C-' �^ v��o < < �
�� � � � � � � � y —
� � �, �C � ? � c c ur
�, � ... r ti w w tn
� � o cio R° R° � �
� ? G� G� <
� �
� � � �.
�' C� '-'-
w' w`
� �
0
�
�
'ti '�0
r r r r r r r r va r r r r r r r r r r r r r v� r v� cn r cn �n v� ` ,�
� v�i cyn c�n � cyn � � G� v�i � � v�i ri ri � � � � r�i� � � G) � G� G� c�i� G� G� G� �' �
�
� a
a a a a a a a a a a a � � a a a a a a a a a a � a a a
< < < < < < <„ � < < < < < < < e < < < < < < < <„ < < < < < < v
0 0 0 0 0 0 �, � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �, o 0 0 0 0 o tp
n: a: n: n: n: o.: � � a: a: o: a: a: o.: o.: a: n: a: o: a a n: a: � n: a: n: n: a: ci <
co co co co �o co � � co co co �n co co cP c� co cc co to co co co � �o rn co co �n cu fD �
G. Q. d �. Ci.. P� � �p G 2 n. G. a. O� 00. G- G. A. O. O- n. Q. a. O. d O�. P�. P� a. Q
7� 7� 7 7� 7� 7� � �j `A `J� `/� 7� T � `r� `J� 7� 7� 7 7� 7� `J� 7� � 7� 7� 7� 7� `J� � '6 Z
co co co co �c co � „ co co co co �o co co co co co co co co co cc � co co co co cP co p
n. n. o. a. o. o. co o. a. n. o. o. n. n. a. a. n. fl. o. o. o. o. n. n. n. n. n. a. �
G C. C C C C p� � C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C p� C C C C C C fD
f� ('1 (� O f� fJ .-� fJ O (� O O O o O O O O C� C� n O .-� c) fJ f1 fJ o c) �
CD N CD CD N (D � fD CD N N CD N N N N N (G N N N CD (D (D (D CD N N �
o. n. n. n. a o. '' a. a a a a n. n. a a a a o. o. o. a a. c�. a. a. n. a
m *�
X N
a a a a a a a a a a a � �
< < < < � s < < < � _ _ _' _ � � � < < < < � � _
0 0 0 � o � � � � o o � o � � � � � � � � o o � o o � � � � � 7 �
w -e -e w w -s -� -, -� �, -, -, w -� -� w -, � N
fl. O. O. � �. � ,� � � G; p: � p„ (o (D (D (D ro fD fP (c O. O. � G- G. N (D � N Q(C "'I
�o �o co � �c vP', rn �p'i, � CD �D � � vA'i vp'i � vP'i vP', vP', ��'i, v�', �o co � co to N � � � O Ol
a. a n. n. � � � o. n. � a. cc � t� t� rn co cP co Q. a a. a rn � � cc N �'C 6
� � C/� L/] � C/� C/� � � � � C/� V� � <p �
T 7� 7� 7� � � 7� 7 7� � C� � � � � � � 7� 77 7 'T � � � 7 fD
co co �o � � -� � -, � co rn � �o �-, �-, -� -� � -s -, -, �o co � cc co � � � � 7 !p y
a a a. n. � - ro o. a. - n. cP co co co �o co rn co c�. o. .. a. n.
c c c �� c w �; m w c c �;� c w w ?» ?: ?: � w w c c �� c c m w �; m � y � �
� c� c� ., t� -� �, c� t� ., c� c� t� ., c� � -� (Q �
rn � � � � � � � � rn � � � � � rn rn rn � � rn � � �
0. n. L�.. 0. � � G. O. �. � -� �t -y ti -s rt -� n. G. G. G. ti � � � 3 0
N C-
� � �
�
N
n
•+
n �t C
< cn ° �n < ° �n cn < <n r� v� v� cn v� v� �n r�, �n cn v� cn �n v� � v� �n �n �n cn � 3 m w �
° sv � w ° � w w ° w w w w m w m m w w w w m -� w m m w w
�- 3 � � � � � 9 � B 3 � � � 3 B � � � 3 B � � � w � � � � � N � � -o ot
� �, co v, � cc c� co cu c� co rn co � c� co rn c� � � � �„ cu c� c� c� c� fD m
G. � a. � f].. � � � � � � � (� � O. � y �
Vl � V� � C/� V] � C/� C/� V] Vi V1 C/] V] C/] C/� V1 V1 V] t/� Cn C/� V] Cn Cn C/] C/] fD n � 7 �
a � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � G1 O � C7
� a>� w w � w w� w`� � a�� w w w w a� w w w w m w m m m ?: m w w m c� v � p� �
f7 "'t � R CJ � ^t R ('� "'S ^t "'t "'t "S "t R "t "t ^S R R "t "S ^t � "t ^t "t ^'1 "t � SU � � �
o. " n. "` a. `` p,� � 'a
p1
=
N
O
�
a a a a � a a D 5 � � � 5 5 5 � 5 5 a� � � �`
0 0 o v� o � c� v� o o �n v� o � � � � rn v� �n � � � v� � � � �n v� �n
P� R W A'+ A� P> �-t �-s rt -t P'+ A� C� � -s �-s W -� -� C� Sv P� 7 � O �
a: o.: a: � o- w � B � � � � � w w w w � � � w w w � w w w � � � � � -p p
fo fD N N (D v� C\ (D (� N v� v� �n �n rn (\ N v� v� v� � w v� r� � � � (n fD <D
a n. a. n. � � a a a co c� c� co � co c� c� c� t� co '
� C/] C/� U1 � V] V] � � � V1 C/� C/� � V] C/� C/� V] M � 7 �D
� z z z �, z z z n c� n c� n c� n n c� c� ='• �
rn co �o � �o -, � � � � � � � -� �, -e -� � a � -� � -, � � -, R � � � � O � �
n. a. o. a co a n. n. � co co co - cc � co �o �o co �
c c c �;� c w �� �;� c c �;� �;� c w ar�, m m �;� �� �;� � w m �;� m w w w a� w � � v D
c�o c�o � -, c�o � -s -, c�o c�o -1 -s t�o � co co to '' '' co �n co '' co cn to " `, -s N - C1
O. G. �. G. �' O. O.. G. -ti �-s -i � ti � -i �s rt � fD <D
7
D �
� -
� � a a � � a a � � � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
0 0 o w ° -�, w m ° ° w m ° � � � � w w w -�, a� w w w -�, � w w w �D
� n: °. � � w � � � �- � � �' w w w w c�o c�\o c�\o ��„ � c��o � � vw, ��„ c�o c�o� � � � �
(p fn t� to c� c� v, rn v� v� � fD (T� <
a o. o. v� °' � v� v� °' °' v� v� °' � � � `� �n �n cn � v� c� cn v� � � cn c� v� �' D tn
� � � �• � � �• �• � � �• �• � � � C� n �' �' �' � �' �' �' �' G) G� �' �' �' � _ w
o.. n. fl. - fl. co o. o. n. co rn � rn - co c�o c�o -
c c c c m c c c sv w w w ?: °: P: �
ai� w� y� w� w� w w w w w w w w` m w
CJ (') C� "1 C) � '� ^'1 CJ C) "t "'t n CD CD CD CD ^S ^'1 R � "'t "'t ^S "t � � R "'t "1 SU
o. o. a a ^ n. a o- "` `' '' "` -, `' " —
a a a � �
< < � � < � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �,
0 0 �, w ° ., w w w m w c� w a� w w w w w m w w w m � w m w w w
'o: c: � � n: � � 9 � � � � � � 9 � � � � � � �a B � � � B B � � 3
c� co � � co � c� �o c� co c� c� c� c� c� c� c� � c� � � c� rn � v, � c� c� � c� K.
n. n. � � �' c� C/] V] C/� V� V] V� C/� C/1 C/� V� C/� V� V� C/� V1 C!� V] t/1 � V� C/� V1 V1 C/� <p
a o. � 3 Q. � � � � � 3 3 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � a"
c c �� �;� c w �;� w � � � w w w a� w w w w w w m w w ?: m m w m a� y
CJ ('J "S "'t C) "'S i"t R R "'t ^t "1 "'S "t "'{ "1 "'t ^'1 '� "t "t "'t � "1 ^t R '� "'S �
� � � R ^'t
Q� �. Q�
� � � � 5 � � a a Y � � Y � � a �
� � �n v� cn � cn v� v� cn v� cn � � � � �n o v� o o � � �' o �' � o o � � �
-� -s w w w -s w w w w w w -, -, -+ -, w w -� w w -,
�o co B B � �D � 3 � � � 3 �o rc co �v � n: � o.: n: �c io � A; � co o- n: ic y �l
A' N c\ c� cP v�', c� c� c� � � � °' v�', ��'i, � � a. � o. o. w `��' t� a � ��" p, a, N C�
io co rn v� v� CD v� �n cn v� cn v� �D CD `° CD �, 7� �' 7� 7� � � v� '� cn � '� '� 1D m c
C� G� G� G� G� G� G� � � � G� G� co �' � co co n � tn
-, �� 3 � •, � �� 3� � 3 �� -� -, -� -� � a. �. a. o. cc �c � c,- - co a. n. � ,_ r.
m „��, w � w ,.��'., w,�` a� w m a� w � m a' a� �; � " � � °' ,a�' w � c; Q,' � � °' °� �
.1 ^'l •-t '�1 ^ n't Fy n't F'S .t ^�'t r'1 "�'t .Z R N � N CD � � � � � � �
a+ a+ a " " Q_ ~ a' a' '
a a a a a °
o � o 0 0 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � o � � D
., w m w w w c� w w a� w w m w w m w w c� w w w
n: � n: °' a: � � � � � 3 9 � B 3 � � � B � � � B B � � 3 � � � �
a N � p_ 0. c� � c� rn c� c� c� c� � c� � c� t� c� � (� c� c\ c� � � c� �
� � � � C/� V1 C/� C/1 Cl� V1 C/� V� Vl V1 V1 V1 Vi C/� � Cn C/� V] C/] V1 V� V1 � Cn V.' (�l)
� n' � � � � � � '.��. � � � '� '� � � � '� '� � � � '� � � � � � � � t1.
O. rn O. C' fl. ... � ,.. � - ._ ... ... - ... � .- fD
c w c � �
a� m w m w w w w w� w� a�� w, w, w, w, w, w, m, m. m. w. m. � w. w
C) C�J C� "1 ^'f ^S '� R "'S R "'S 'S ^'1 "1 "t "t "'t "'S "'t "t 'S "'t "'f R ^t � "'t "I �
n, `; a, a o. a v
cn D Y � 5 � 5 5 5 5 � � � � � 5 5 � � � ° � � �
Z c�i o 0 0 � � � � � � -�i � � c� o o c, o 0 0 o c� o v� � o � � � � �O
•K �-t � R A� �-t w � � �-s ^s -� -s �-s -z �-s .-t �-s y -i -s W '< ^ -i "i -i -s r
co to �,: a: co co �o co co co �o to co co co rn cc co co � w y co � co �o p D
Z w w �n co w � � � � �' �' w m w w w m w w w w w w � �, �, � �, �; w � � �
fD N N N !/� V f/� Vi V [A f/ V� VI VI f/�
O N �' L7' P. CD N N f� f�
(D CG N (D fD (D CD f\ N CD N (D � � C� � N N O) N �
N � � 7� 7 � � � � � .n C'� rn .n C'� rn .n ni rn .n n G� C'� C'� �' C'� ni � C�'� � � o � D
o co �o � � 'z ^ -, -, �-, � -� -e -� � -, � -� -, _ co co ' cv "' '' � �
o c�`o c�`o a. o. c�`o � c�`o � � �o co co �o cc co �o �o cP �o co �o � � �o � co �0 3�,r �
co� � a� c c m m w ?� w °�' °�' ?» ?± � ?» m m w m w a� w a� � ?; � ?» �
�� �c c� c� � � � n � n co co cc rn c�o cc c�c co �c co co �c co io n co co co � co cn � 7
�f�D ^ '� fl. G, n -� �-s 'yN "r.� `+ "� �s �s -� � n ti �-s � � �s ^.. `y.. � `j. � � � y
=
p V <
N W y
�
M U
N O
L L i-r L L i-w L ��
; N N N N N N N �
��c � L L � � � � ^� �j m
L ° c? � c� v � � c� � ��
a� � � � � � � � � � w�,
�, � � � � � � � � �
Q J � � L °s-' � � °'-' � `�°�
� U U U U U U U � Q
# G' C C G' C G' Q
N
�
G
W
�
f6 �
O
a+ 'O '6 � '� "� � '� � �.�`.
� U U U U U U U
y � � � � � � a � U
� � � � � � � � �
y c4 c4 cb cG c4 cb a! �
d -o -o v �o o -v -o
� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� �
_ -o -a -o -d -a -o -o �
Q o � o 0 0 0 0 �
� d Q Q d Q d d
N N N N N N � y.
� f� � � � � � � � �
N � N N N N N
y � � � � � � � � �
� '� N N N � N N N �
U •y �
r� y ° � � ° ° � � �
� � U U CJ U U U U �
C C � C C � C
� �
41 N � N N N N N y,
� � � N N N N N �
� � � � � � � �
d a � �
�
K '6 'O �
C N N C
C '6 'C1 N N N N � G
�. i. �, s, i. �
� Q Q C C C � C �
'6 'II
� N N N N N N
�
� � � N N N N N
'O 'O �
MN — � CC L� C7 C7 C7 C7 C�
Q � � �
j � L '� '� c�i� v�i v�i v�i v�i ��+
+� V '6 'O N a�i N N N ❑
� � � O D U U U U �
> > C C C �C C
� � ¢ Q
10 Q
C
L
d � "B "O "O 'O 'O 'O "6
Q �"� ^ d U V U V CJ U U �^
� � 01 � 7 � 7 7 7 '� �
� (n O � � `° � � � � � �
� � r o r� x c� x x x x �,
� �
� fl- � � �o �c :v -o o -o �o �
d � a� � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
p � � Q Q Q d Q Q d
C
O
N
�L
� a
Q- _ c
y -o -o
� U � � L L L L ir
� 7J QJ �N N N y
O � � f9 3 '� (� �C � :C cC ,�
C- � � 'y -p -p N N N N N
� � � � �
V (n � fG C a� a� �
+-' U N � �
�+ a�i m L a �' �' �' �' �' �'
d m � � �
� Q U E y �O �O QJ L L i-�. � (C
� M � � � ¢ Q G' � C C C �
7 � U
�
v
t4
�
� d C
� �
o � a -o -o �o �o -o -o -o -o
r � � U U C�i C�i U C�J U c�J
� a+ f0
n d � �_ � � � � � � � � �
� � y O f� fx fx fx fx f� C� fx N
(C 0(7 N 'O ^O 'O 'C3 ^O ^O 'O 'O �
�� 'D 'Q "O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O �
~ � Y � O O O O O O O O �
� ._ f0
� (q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q �
X
� W �
a
m
+' _° � � a�i a�i � a�i a�i �
N � � � 7 � � � � �m
"O "� 'O 'O 'O '6 'c7 'O V
Z O. C�, �. C�i p�. CG C� L� Cy. �
o 'o
� -v �a �o -o -o v -o -o Q
� j � -o -o ^C �o �a �a -o a�
d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w
� Q Q Q Q d d d d L
0
�
� �, o
h �
� � F^ F-{ U� C`J CJ CJ C7 � U N C
o � ,� ,� cn vz v� v� v� ,� n -a o
L
QI a .� � �
� O .
m 3 �
U � L
N
� � '3
o �m
3 c �
m
O D U
� � ��
c6 'N 01
�
N (�1
� .� C
Q� � � @
N L
y N � F- Q
N N � N �'
_ ,� � " N uI
io
a�
r � � � J ,
c E u Y a �
y N cn �' .� u� � N
� N C C N � G
� � O v� O � O C C �
C � V � U � '_ O � (p
L
o � � � L � o 'U � :c � .a
> � � a� � a� � � o � � .
rn �
� � � c o c � �, � T m � � > >
W �> :.. ' � � � � -o
� � CJ U U U U N -p O f/1 U �
� (D � �' �
� U
a-, w w a=. a�
V 4. w 4. 4. 4, � � "O U s !N O
.O -� F- F- F-� E-� F-� � �° �° � a N bA N :o m
F- O -a -o �o -o -a � � � � � J v� a`0i o � ^
y N � � � � � � Q � � Z u �� � Q � o
w N _ �
� � o 0 0 0 0 `� oi � �� iii n cn C7 i X � o
� i o � C � � � � > N � o Z � v] X X o 0
� '" O O O O O N (6 � � � �N
y � cC P, 21 C]. O. CL � C � N > � O
a � U c�C c�C c�O c�C c�d � � � � � N zT
Q '� N i-. L 3-i i-. L r O a = � Q �`�
^ 0.1 C� H H H H �- � Z � Q a�
�� �, '
�,o �'� W W W O O O O O O O O O
� � � L L L W W � � � � � W W
�.� co � � � ic oo � o� ti� �i w n� =�
� � � N -� o
°'Q C
�� y�
o.p m � ,a o � H � � � —3 O � ""3 ° '� � ° '-j � �o .-� �• ..� —: � � Ts �
�m n ° co a ° .� ° a� ° �, N o ,� o � � o � � o '. o � o o �, o
� O "� � � � 'O � �, 'O � c�o �3 � � (o �-t � � � '� A� � u y< �• � O
m � � �, � o � o o co � `` -, o �` -, o �. � o � o a zs
� � � o' � o � � � � c . '. c � < w CD < o '. < � < �, w � p- <
� � � � � -�i c4'o � c¢o °' � �' � �' � G. c��n � w �' c�'o � cao t�o a `C7° o �
,� � W
n�i `� V� �' � � � `n c�o O � � p � O. y O v' �' ca'n ;�' a' ,�O O '� p�
�[ W c� � c� a, � � ,.�.� �' � ��„ '.O t! � ^* '. O �p � � G.
rV � .'3 'CS ^i� N � :7 � `�" cUQD O �, � (D � 'O y �G' � "'� '.Y C C (D
� � G O a. C � � vi � '* .fl `C3 C�D � At � � '`S' C�D fD UQ � .� . �. �. UQ
W � O �• � � a � � � � � � � �, � O � O � � � � � �. � �
� � �, �' � o � < � o �ti �. � � � � �: � � � � o, � o a
N r"'S � r-! �G �• N N � � v� (� � � � <
� co �' � '� � � °' � � �' � � � �' � � a, �. � a a; u�
rn T' rn o � � 0• � � �, ,,
� � W � � � � O � � � �' c�-, � p, � G. p � m � Ua c`nD
:r : '+ � � '� � G' � co A� p " � �n � � �-
v �G w' � u° � � � � � �, c��n c�o � � a� � ��i, � �
v� � r+ �� v� G. � � m � � � r. r � � � k � �
C
O � ': c� -s � ;Y py p
� � a� � c�o '� � o � � � `< C ?' �° � � '*� c�o �.
� ¢' ty. ^� � 0 v, � N ,� cUOD p� � N m � c�D �' -� y � C�
� w � � .-� O � `� � � .��. '+ � p� � v� � � G �• '+
,y� f� �' �G C � cD c� v� � ..� x Ll. ^ �-s
� .�.,� � o � �, c�o � � o co `< a co = � m 5' O
UQ � c� � ,..y r+ � � � � � � p co Q. � co � O pq �a
c�o � cNo O `CD" v�o -`Ds .Y '" k co `` �. � y "' c'.i '*' � � cD
r* � a� '* co C �' �' '* � � '. '` c�n � o �' co � �
� p� � G' Oq � 'fl � � � ^-h � ,�,� � �' � �. � � .� ;T; (D
G' � At N � v�i A_�. C�D � W p7 � y • OQ i A� .'3
.'w3 � p' � Q ,�.' T3 '� n'0 � � � � � (/] '+ p� :-'' � �
'B W . �
a O ..�+ � p- C3. � O. "'�S' N � �� W UQ .�j � � � � �
�`o' � �' � o a c ,.,, � a w � '-' � w' <u � � °.'
�' � � -, < '� o �' � �C � � . � o cn �
w' � � �„ � � r' v° �' � � �' �' ° � u�a ~. �
vc c� � C� � o
� ?: � o �' o �: °' �' � � �
�s � o � n: � � � c� n � �' �e m' .� �
� w' � O ,.��., � � ,n � I-�e � � � < c�o " c�o w �.
'. rn �' � W� � p�i � � �, c`to "�i � (D f� � O
� N � � � � •�• '+ � N� � �-nt C ' �h
N "� N � � �, �i ,� � ;� N �G � � .��'+ � At
n � p, � � ri�i � O � � '-' p � O• � � UQ
�' N � � ,.�.' "y � � p v� .�-' '�'� N A��7 OQ (�"hD CIQ
� p, ,� ,�. p� <, .� `G � `O `� � O p' �
� �' � rn � � o � � � � �' �, �*, w co
p -- Uq � rn C m m �
� '� � O � '. �' � � `� c�� � O. C O. �
� C � A� � '+ �' � � v� C � "* O � U�q �
p� .'3 � � '+ O fD (� � � ¢' �' C (7Q � W
n � � � � � n � � i �
`..'i � '�' vni O � � �-t ''� � �. C �. �G � ,�.
�' p� W < `G OQ � � � C a. p "' �
� p. '� O. p �7� (!q �� � � ,'�� � �' O �
UQ �n G. N rr� UQ CD UQ UQ N UQ � "�.3 �G W ai
�
v �
�G �
�
� Z Z z Z z Z Z z Z Z Z o � s
�, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v z
3 � �
c� �
� o,
�
�
r.
'C `d 'G 'C � C N a
0 0 o O �
� � � � � � � � � °. � �
o � � < =
� ?'_� '� ?r� � ?r� '< Z Z Z Z � �'.� Z Z z � m c� <'
C � C � C � � o O O O C ,C O O O � � y � y
� .� Zl
CD n lD n cD n (D n
C G C C S1 7 fD �
a o. a a �, �° � tn
Q
�
�
n
n �
O
� � m � -�a
y 3 � � �
c�o c�o c�o z c�o c�o c�o c�o � � � c�o o' � � � y
� � � o � �., � �, � �, �, � � � .. p
"• � 7 '0 7
N � p� �
� � fD
C.
O1 �
3
,A
"� �< "'� Z "� Z ^� '-� '� Z `� Z N O�i N Q D
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
� � � �
�D � 3
� �
�
��
.Z1 �
<D
� N
� � � O o o � � � o � o .°�., y
o —
�
�
�
o�
� � � � z z -� z -� z -� z � �
� � � � o � � � � � � � � x
�
a
� V
N
� � � � z z � � � z � � � �
�, �, �, �, o o �, �, � o � �,
� �
d �
�
� � � � z z � � � z � z �: �
�
� � � � o � � � y o � � � n
�
d
�
�
O � "'C C b � V
� O � �
O �
�� � O � � � � O O O � � O O O � � �
rt �
0� � � �• � � � �•
fD 7 �
�N � < `G '= ::
�V N � � � <
N W �
V y
�`_... `„�.'
.,.._. � a� a a� a� � an a� r � -o � �; >, � ,.�� � � o .� � c -o y � .C° }; o > .� .J �o
Y o > Y ._ c y a� a .� � c � y � o .t
�� � �, •� � cn � " � � '� ;.a � �; '� o � �' a � .� a� �,a
:3 -o � � �a -o � °' �. 'N �a c � � � � > ° � °o, 3 on ° � o � > `° o
d f� c '� � ° '� y '� a � � � ,.�.`�, °' '� �� .� o -� .� � Q �. -o i � '—'' y c �i .m
� N O '' a) cC cUG � ~ � � c�d > c�i .� �.V, � � Q � � O � � 'n L � � cC � N Q_' C
� +' f6 � ❑ ¢' •� N � U � a� +' CL '-�' � N � � r�j � 'b A. +-' � a�i � �� iC W�
� c �' E �a y a 3 " o � � '�'' Q a� n, °° � ° � � '� � �
� L J � > °a o � '� o. °�' o, ,a ,� � �, � o o �? > ° a�i Q E > Q. ^ o Y `�°�
Q �' o � �i y �? o ¢ a�i N >; � �' � o � y � � � � c° �� � c � o `° �, .a.,' �, O
Q � E 'a � '� '� a� � � c � c °c�, 3 � >, N � �, ° � a ' ❑ � a -v ,� � -°'o a>
� ai °�'' o a`�'i 4w-. � v � `'� a. � n. ° � ai ca t' °� � c� -� �'' � w a� `� .c v �' o a�'i � � c
E-� �o � � �a o O -o � =o o w o a '�' -o � � � .� r?, E-� �a '> o � � F- -o �a � � o � m
O
�
`� c �O `� � o � �O ,� `� Q .��'c, �' � o
aCi ca�i 0 � � C � v' p as � a� .�
�, � � -° Y ° � O. G� V ` c�'c � V
y �'_' s.. t, �.. �� 7 O > � Q �
� y o `� �° a. L .� °a 3 °' � a' on °' i �
c c,, Q Q � � � �a a� E .� c � -o
> a� � � � a� ❑ Q Y }; 'c �' • �
+' .p -' � � � � � o � � � � � ac�i 7 �
L G! I.�. � U � c`�'C � C�. '� O
� � y � � ,� � }'J V] � L
+. � � � 3 � a� a � a� � E o � .o � ?
>
Q Y a ❑ o •.. c � • �? ❑ °�,' w° ��
Q � � � o � � � 'c � � � � o '� o °= �
� �+" Q' ❑ � � � � a� �o c ° � o ° s :�
� ,c o ° E�-� �a '> w � a. � � a. 3 a F- �a
on o -o a� � c -o on � � -o >, � � � a � � c -a c a� c �
c o � ;� � o � � Y � a' � � a� �c � o a� Y � o � � Y o °'
� 'c � °3 �� o � 'c .:, � o cd � � � ¢� .°�' �� o � � � ¢�
+_' � ,. o � °�, 3 -o � � � '� o �^ �' a�°i � Q, oo � °a, 3 a� . ? ¢, a�
n a�i a � c� ° i � ca ¢ i �-' � � a °' .� > � � ° a s° �a ¢ � � � ,� � �
� � CC �O � � L � VI � � i-i � � �O � � (� L"' ,� i-�i �'' �
� rn '� � Q '.o � a� o °J •� � ,� � Y o •� i � a `� a a� o °' � � �? � � o
�E a> � v� � � .� � o o x o, v, 0.+ � � � o � � G.
d � U � � 3 � a� O, C � � 3 •� � � °� a� � � � a� G. C � O .� � � �
+, a a�i �C � .d `' '- � •❑ .o � d �~ y E .n `� � c `' '-' .E '� a`�i n. '- ° b
� a � o o a; o
Q N � > 5 a� w � � o o a�i a � � o y «3 w � � � o � �
3 � � `� � � '� a��i ` � a � � � � ,i a' . � a� >, N � o a��i � � a. .c o. .v o 0 3
U <,,, a. a� o � „c y N w a� .� a�i � t°�o � ° a�i `� � .� c'' ,� � w a� � � s a
� .� ¢� A.. � �. H � '> o .o E-� -a � =o �e �+. a -o E � � c� Q F-� � '> o � � � � L1
•� Q °° o o �$ ;� � `° a`°i o > 7 0 � � .
� � O � � ,� U
� C O y O. v� � � � > � 3 �� O
; ��q a�i 0. "O � O, .� � C c��0 '�-' O [� � O.
'++ = rn � O � a) � � � � id � O. � � �
C Q�j �" ❑ O � � ,r � � py � N ..- � N `d v'
� �( +' � c0� � yp > � 4" � O O � � 0.
� � 7 a� � �' �" �n O b � pA N O
y � C C Q s, ' 4� � '9 � O �' �„� �n C O.
Q cn O �C V b .� V � C O 3 .^' N � C Y N
N
� � � :v °' ° � .o � y � •o � � �y c s
. a �a ¢� 3 '� a. E- �a a � '� � y •E p- � °
v, b a� v� � w a� a� � Q o b
c o ,o o p .s a�
E ro � L � ° a� � � �
� � � :n—� � � '� � > � � `� o
O '� c o `� �o a �, ,� � o •� A- � a
'i d � a � Q -o `� � 3 � .� c �
> +� �,
� �, �6 E a`�i `� � � a� � Q �-'' � � �
Q- � d �j °' ,� o � �a � � a�
� ` V � Q � O U N L'
U � � U .b�^D b�yA 3 � N C�. � v' � O � O
�
s. � � bA � �
�' a Q � � � o � � � �� •� � � " o -o � �
�� ,� A. p, � a, � � � � o 'G o 0 0 '� 'o
� .5 � ° °�.' E- � '> a � a � a 3 '� a
(! �' � '° °' v' � o °' a� c� Q o -o
o � � � �
� � U � ��.+ Y � � � �
� 'a � '� `rL" .� � b °' v ` `d O
_ � ro O p � p ? cC Q
Q' � Qj !6 � � w G' y, ,� � LY � II.
� �
� � !4 fC � L1, ¢ Q 'O rn S]. 3 b�A �
�
� f0 tn O � � N � '� � N �o ¢ y �❑ `� a�
� � � Y � � N � � �
r
� d aci ° � � o0 on 3 � � N �> a" '+ o
_ �'' Q- d � .5 � ai � sa. E o
� �
L Q O v a a 'c .o � ? � aw � � � �
`r � � � � ° `: � `a � �� b � '_' o .° ^a cc�i
a c c o o � .� � � � o � � o o '� 'o
c�j . � � H � > w � � � a. 3 '� c.
�
' a� �, �+-� v v ^o tA a� N w a� -o a� ca �-
� .0 `� � o � '- O G' .� � O � a� .� Q � �
� `J A. .cC y C .�-� O .L'-+ � � N .� � � fn
� �O a� � � � � � � � � � CL y � °� c`�d a
� _ c > • � � �� a y � o � '� � o ? � � °
0 0 ❑ o 0
~ y v � �ia � � � � 3 � ai o i � °o- 3 c�, � � � � n.
> �a +r � � a � °- " .o � �c a� E . � �
�+ a� cE � a.,' � `n ❑ Q •° � a� c ¢ � �'' �a ,� N �
c6 fn � ` � ia � N ,� o ca � a�i o t o c� � � � �
� c a> a> a � � �, " 3 � � �
C) d V � y `n cUd � cC � -�-� � � O rn > p" O
�' a d � y ,a ao a � � ai °' a �: y p o a�
Q O � p � � a� c .� a�o ,b a� ,-. � -d o � .� � .o . � � .
�n > > a� w � � �,
V � � 'a� c��C �y �G c�i O� ° � .�^ � °' y 'r i p �o cC �
❑ �" � G U y �
� p s�, b4 � cG '6 n' ❑ � p' � � v�i � -p O G O � p � O
� a. c. -o '> a � .� ° � °�,' F-� �a '> a °�' o. .'�- � a, 3 '� a
L N � v � � �-�.+ > >.°�. � .�-. Q :� E O � .Y � � C� c�
C ¢ y �
y � � � L � � � � O 'fl Q
� �- o o .� �' � c o .y � � � °' o � o � � � � �� �
N . ^ �
j r � = a�i d U � `� Y x •� > � a � � N � '� � � �
� � °o. 3 a� c E °A .
� � '� � . � � � ¢ � Y c � o
"'' y � p y ' c�i c�i � �' a'�"i .� id �� � a� � � � ia � G•
� � C7 N " � a, a °' 'o � � � � � ° � °u •°' ce N `d � a�i
G> Q- p�� � op � N � � sy o. >' > a+ � Q� o � N > A"' ° o
y � � m 'O � �+°: a�i `' �" -o a��i � c° � o i'. ? � cq 'b 'o � � o a� o
a > .j .v .c � o �; °�' � •y °..' � w �� • � °�' °�' L Y c � o.
a> • �. � o �v o a� L � '❑ � o � o -a �,
X � . � Q �, � . �. c a�
� W � °-� a� ai 8 Q o � � � .L �O ,L � v�i cd c`"i o � 0 'O o t
F- .° � ._ � o `a. �a E � �, a. F� ia '> a. .� a � � Q. 3 °
a� w � a� w �
> � o > � a
C �� � ❑ o �� N ❑ o
� d c > .� 3 � > .� 3
> C. '' o d :3 0 (�
w. o � � a � ro � a �
� as��
t4 —y N a; c� y �, p� `� ¢
L � .i'" L� ,�,� Q N i" C � N
� N `. � O dp 'O O p b-0 "O
Q Z '�Oa� `� � � c��d 'O �' � G c��0
.�7 � .� G. � � .'�.. .� G. �
twi �"' � � o o C a�i � � o �
O O. � � rn � c�' � � �'�i, � c�Ca
p�, � -p �a� a� ^� Or .fl �a� a� � 0.
a� � � � • w c� � T y • w
d;� °a, � � c4 � � o � � � � o
Qy � � a o � c v�i o
fl.+; a, -� � � �> '� d y � � b �> ' f�
O Q T VI L O � V] L Q �
a` a � � � °�° � °" � � � � °° � Q, �
�
H 8 � -o :: c� H E � -o .°3 � ¢�
�
� � c' o
y C O
•' � 7 V � Q O
C +'
d �
d � N � � � � O
a C � � � mU
n W a � ��
��
'o.,c.
�
�o � c
v'� � y �
m y �
°�o t�j m �
�`� � �
� � w 7
� � �
-•�
m
� � � ° � � _ � �
� ¢' � ° � � °° � ,� �, o �
� d �� � .� ` n' � c '� m o
� � � � C 0� �' •q '� � q!
N � (D W �y O � fD
O � O `G n � — O.
W N �� � �. N c� p' � �
� � � � � � � �
p. �' n O O. O, 41 �p'
� � � � � � n �� �
� „�� '� ,�.� �- O c�o � �
C � � � U�Q � n �. Z
p- v' Q. a- f�'� � � � � � �
c�c CO O�v � ^�+ � m � � :'
� o� °' � � �
< � ��-n � N � �
° n � O
�, w _
o. m � � �a ��-n � '�+ � �
� � o < �, � � �
a. � � � N•
�• o• c �. ^ < ,��.
C7 00 � � ?'- cv w fD
� o N ts � .� v • 2s �*, �v w � ts � -� � w d �v d o �
❑- c -� �� o � -, � �o 0 0 �, �. � �' �, v� � �n
-wi v�c � °. �v � cv �o. ^a � '' � co ° �. � �,• ?; �° � � �CDi, � ^v n. K �
-, �,
� � �. � � � o � � �' � °� w � � � o � a' r'' p- c °' w -�, .y+� �
� <
co -, a: c• c � �' � � D
0
� � a. � � � � � w � � � � ° � �°n � � °c °' CD d � � m C.� � �
� �°-n aa m � �; `�' p= w �' � ' w,' a G� 4� t�a' CD � �o N � 3 �
a c�
'� G, n, � � N � P-.3' ��i, '� � rn � `° � `C � < w. � �? � � � � ? �
O c��9 ^ � P' `�" d�Q �=i, � v' � v Q' �G N � � '� ��
� o� "d n. � `o �' r, co " �p a' �, � � � � Cd � �p �t C
� „� N
�n < � ° ,�° 0'a � �°o c�o C � o .o° � � � w y o n' c�o (� �' � O.
�' v,' � o� � ?: ° m a w �-n ° �; y v,' o. �' a v� c�o p� _ � �
� �s rn �p e co cP � ?' co p � �' �n o' '� o �, �
c� w a -, co a a �n Y a� �' a ., �' '� aa a ao G� � ?= a. co
� o � � 0 7 � � � � � � �
� � � � �
w o w =°, � � c �' °: `� Ts ^ n
�
c' o. c�n � � `; � � � p7 � � ° � O D
co ,� � fD � o � � v, � o• v, � 3 n
� ~"� ac r.. � -' � w m3 � � �
°• ° ,b a� a� w � n o co O. � � � �
,.t�. v'. n p � `� � � �' � fD f1 �� �
� � � � � � � � � � � n �
n. ^ p � � c�o � � `C ro � 7 � � w 41
� o c o < �, � a;' C7 � � p, a
°' '' � °' < w .,, ° c cD
�
v, t�o c�c c�o � o�c a. a ° o�o c�'o V
�
W 'Lf '� �] O < t]. � "� 'D O N
O A� �.. .* N' co (D c'�'� Cy �h �
'� p � f^p N � P� � � vwi ,t,3 a � �
< ¢' �' � O �' (7�q CD. � b7 a �, � O D �
CD ' w � w o' � � �� i �
-,
o � �' .fD�'. � CD n � p'_
c`�• �. '� = � � � � ��-n -�i � O f0 G�i <
� � N CD o � � a' � �' � � � � < �p
� °i � � o a, cc �. � — c� �D �
'ti co W fD
o, � w A
0
=° o � o a,° �, � C7 � � �- n
a � � �,• � � � ,,*
� � � � � � � � � � �
c
s� �o � .-� o < a. 2s � o � �
� ° � � "' _ °° � ^ "' p- 3
� � � � w � � R �
� � �, o o � °- �' o. �' �, D D �
�� �c o w � n' � �,' ,� C�
�' �, m �
o � �' � � w o °� n � �
y � �.. �p -1 7
�°� �. '� • .�, c�v v�, � � �p a1 -C
„ � � ° c � �. �' ^: < �
�
� -�s � y o` � _. c�o 3 � y
°- o .v � � � p� O
� o � o ti° �, � CD � 7
n. � � w•
c
v��,' � � � � `G c�o '°, c`�'o
w �o `� F � 7 � �' c c�°c Y ^c = �- C
� o �� � �' co p� co c � — ct co� co 0
� � :; �cs -� � � co � o. D
m � -wi n' -�n o � � �' � '�»i N "�`
o �• ic o cc , a, �-n � � '.
�9 � o � � N � Oo � � �p � �' x �
� =' N ' „ � �'' �, a �
n. � �' � � =
� 'o c�o o � ca'u y `� � �D �y tn �
W fD
•� r�n 'O. �, C a� � 'O � W
O ,� �n� O. C �. .Q'�.
N
v' a ° � °, w a�c v�', c�o c�o � � iv
� �o � -� C� F, c cn.o �' a- = on o c � �' � C
� °• � m �. � � N is •`° w a°o � � � `D a f�
w .�» N :+, a. � w o � w ts � w � °, =; C
� o a b �• a � � �, y D
�' � � l� 'b w• c�c m � x � � p= CD �- c�o 7 � �
� G `G ,a N 'i
C � � � N � � cn� `Ct � -t P� in 3
p, '�' 'O � 'C 7 � O � ��+, � cao R �- �. io fD ._r
R ,�O v��, � 'B � p' '' o � m :? �. � w c�D
T�Y � � � O � ,' •� -�i �' a' � ,_ C 7 V
O O � N a. � fl. O n � C � � a1
''S (D G Q�J N � � n � � N �' W fD p �
v�� a. P. vi dQ dQ cD �n� �t (D �n �n .t N
'° CD `� v°'c =° Y � �°n �e � � � �°-ti � � °' � C � � �°n � �^ � �0 �
o �, a- � o o �' .Ly � � �, o� � o � N.
�.. v� cu � io � w c � � �. c °-°� a ao v, �G aa a. co' -�S �
� � C 7 � � c~o �, n. �o �, co ='- 0. � � p� co � � c� Q, � —
c � � °'- c��o °' R n: �- io � a�c '° �- � � � � � w ,� � � � o°o �� D D
� � � � � � ° � � � D �' w � o < � �o B o w � m � e
� d � � � O C�D � � � M N � � � � '
,a ,ti h,� v, � � N � �. C ,� ., � co v' � o p! 7
�? �' m ��„ � a,� rn '� : �s co c�o �= � CD v�i � � G: .�_.,
p� � v a- r"i, O � �. � v�c�, � �n o, .� � � � p,; � p.' c�o d a� � <
� � o, 'C �D � w � �' �' � °. �' a < � � � ty � o = p�
� O C ,v�i Q � F� C � � w � p �? � n Q�Q Q' w O S p C '� Yl
� O A. "� O ,,,,j � '� w w P- Q- � (p � � `6
� � �, �o o a �
� co � � _ � 5' � � <' d 5' o� � 0 3' w o w � � � o
S3� CD (D p. CD CIQ R Vl CD CIQ � CD .y CD [A V] r CD P� CD tY
�• � � �o �• � y zs w � o a� v < o. �o l�i v� � C� C� c � o w � w o. .� o � o < w, .� ^o o �y o �-
•, co or� cc � cu co � �n � o cc �- cv �n �• p- �
y O � � � y !-} � O � O �. � CJ .� � .i"t. � CD n' VJ "'�s � `y � � u'� i..T � � "t "�'I �� ^ � � �Y
{y fL. � Q � V�1 � ''7 CD � � � � � �. r"'I �-�j � � ' � � `� CD (� Q1 "� (p � � �
_ $. �°�, n. $. � c°'o o <' � o w � � � a d � � � C7 � s o " �c <' 3 0 � � B < ? � � � � r� �
�o �c � "'y rn o � co w n. c � � n � o � co ts � �� w co 0 0. � p � �
o � � o � <' 'w' ^d ° CD w 5- �' ; � w a � � w � � � � ° �' � a- ° c � < � � � .i
w �,• �' � � p� � c a N � rn � �• w cu � o. o' �; ° � a co D o co c � °- o �' = < M o
N rn c) 7 � H C � d cc '� co O• �o ;7 �o � C •
� C CD OQ � W � '-'. O <D D
O� �, c�, . � � C � ^O p �' -e p � n � 'v r�ii `+ y p�j v, p' � � � � p� �' �- 'Cy � = 7 N +
Ci
o� � �. �, � � � "` o' � N o � � °c � �, °° � �` m � o a; °' aa d '° � "` o w w y cu `''°
cn� � P' � cv � ..� � � -i o w < c� � � ..� � ° v � � � �p y
�m .� p; � 0 4y o � � o � �,• �- � �, �' n � �D � �' � . � o � cu ° co � �a ..
�� w a� <� �- w � � �' �: �� C �, '' c � o o� � � 5- < o� � �,' cc ° ° `` v`,' a �; a°c " �
N� � o cv co � a m m v, -, n. co � �< �n o. � �G co co co � cc � a o '�
y
�. �
M U
� N C N N O � bA 'C a�,.,. ....., A ❑ G) C R. T3 'O a� N N `+� C C 'O � N C a� ^ N
� � � � � .Y O > � y C � � � .�� � O .0 y O (� a) � a) > > t � ' � 7 ."C.+ � c�C N O
� ° y ° '> ° � U ,� ? c aci 3 -o o � � �' � � � •� o �, � �� >, ..�°. „ ¢ 3 � o � `�°o
a� .�
d u� � -o � Y � � c � >, �, o ��e a. � 3 Y a o � " � -� � ? .°', °�,' '� � � '� � �' � m
> G� p v � a� ,°�. «� c � y� '"' � �� . cd a� n, ' � v, -p o,p ca � s. � •
�' " Y -� �? � � � Y > � ,c °A � y `� �o N a� p a� o, °3 `° �c
� U y �j
!C ++ t6 A. cC � y� v� C Q" O cd � O 'in � O 'O 'O cC 4: � A. .., N Y � N C Q .� N N w�
C1 O C y �s.. N C � ~ � «. CL C
L c o o. o o w a� � o '� � ``" a�i � � �ro � � a� � � n. °' �o E °' � c °' � a m�°
�; � J � ... o y � > a. � y o Q 6 �, � ; � > � o � � �, o • � �°„ cd � -o E� > a Q�
Q �' � •o -o � o � ��, :' w �. ��a o � i o a '�c�n cd a a ': y 'o '�' a`*"i 'b � c 'c � � ° c .o
a � � � E c`� ai � > a�,`'i � � ,,.��., � � = a�i > n, '� E � :� � � � 'o ,� o Y � o �o �� .� r� � c�i a> ; � 7 �
� °�' -a :3 u '�, h -°'o � ° � 0 3 � �� � -o .� °' � � o � � E o. 3 3 3 F- 3 3 ° '� w .� o H -a � ° m
O
w a� ",
� � � > c � y o .c �e o v � -o .� � y Y o °�° � '° > � o
� �c :3 F" U 3 0 ��a �c o o �� o
ao � � °A ° .� a ° � � Y � z a�i 3 y � .�v�, � � p^.� � c. � 3 � U
�+ � � °' ° � � v� E � a"i 3 �y � c� � � �
>
� d � � -�o '� .� � o 00 � � " ° �, 'o _� °" � �, °n
� '� (� QI � (C � �' L VI `/ O � � � C� U O Y"' � � �
N
� y w 4" � .U b�A L]. .C ro cd ^O � '� p, � •� cC ,� � � C
G1 � � � Q .� � 'i, '� � � .� v� bA F.,, � � ^d
�'' � o 'O `n '6 C � cd > .� rn C p, .� > � � 'C � Y o G"
a Q ,. '� � ,.d ^ Q ° � ��a � � •° ° � � w° .� ^ � � Q � � � '� �°
� N cd �.�. a�, " v' �j Q ' �.�, �.�, cC � � � � �
� ^ U p b � N C � y CL � O N y N p � � '� � O � U U
� �a W 3 3 d o ° •�" � � E a � � � F�-� 3 3 ° •� Q � a. � °�' o
.� � `� � '� � � •°°' c � � °' � � � :c � ? y o o�n -o � -o
�a `� � � a i ,� .o a cd '� � .:, o -o �� :N � 'c � '� o GU
+r ? � -o .� '� .� � '� E �' � E a >, .° � °= E 3 ac°i
•N '�"on Y a' ; '> ° � °; � � � w c � :� Q�
� � '� a � �c Q" ,a n. c°� ^. � � � � � 3 .3 � � • � � �,
� N � �,_, � w d � � w -- � ¢' 3 � N .� i o '� � � c
c � c° � w 3 '� � 'y � � � � 'o -a � n. °U' c � � '� " �
�
y L � � �3 ¢`� o E�-� � °' '�'' � .� a. • � o ;.c � �a
= y .� o Q � �, c4 E � . o � -o � > � � ,b Q 3 " Q o.
CL L. U � C
Q 7 � '�d � a .r .� °�' y .c � 'c��d a ,� o a�i .c y ,fl w � � � � '� •�
V � N � > .c � � � � � � '� U ° o a. i � o 'O � � a`�i a � � �
� �� ¢� -o °�' a ° a .G on ro � Z � a .� �e E-� 3 3 ° ._ ¢y .� � °�' o
> E �' � i E ,� o `� o � `� > �O �*�
o � � •� ; w � N y o ¢
� � `� E Q, � o ¢' � °n.
� 3
i. � • rn V .� O Y bA
G) y � c`d ,C >, w � � N a� p, � � C
f�p -p � -O � '� A, G. � � � � � � �
C y �n � � a� c`d y 7 �n
� K ,� c� � a� 3 � id bA � a� ai .� � G,
r,�, � " �, � ? y p � � � � o � � .
Q O C
�. W � bq ' n � 4r cd
-C ^ � 'v�"i .G' t�„ ¢, �.�, � a) N y_�, -p � 7
,� a� a� � � a 0. � bA ,L' O � � � � � U
."�.+ � � vi 'O O CL :: F-� 3 �n A. id � o., O
� cd 'O N N �++ � ^ G' G. � 'O � N N N `+-" bA '-' a) �n -p �
� N � ^ � y O ,L' c0 O U 7 ;� > Y Y � C cUC -� aroi 7 �
`� Q'� o �o °..,' F" U 3 0 �� '� ¢. `� � o -o
� °' 3 00 >, � `� � Z 3 .� E .� � � .0 a� 3
p � � ? °�° ..d 3 a � ° � .- ',�, � :? °�,' � ° a, .d ? o�0 3
.` � o � '� � ° � � � � � � a"i 3 � � � N E •= o �
Q- � � � py � + � � ° � ? � ° � b v' � 'c��i ° � c`i ia p, � '`,_—'
� � � � w O. '� � O. � � c� ,a C .�-+ O, y C c0 C w � �v�
O G� N �n � � a�i •�., -o � °' � °' on '- rn O � aCi
U Q � � o 'U � � o � � � � � o ¢ � � � • � � � o y o � �
�' Q � � � � i '� � c � � = n. .� c ``" .o = � � Q -o .� >
y � N U U
�� � N c'"" G. � a� C � y f1 y O a� � � p b A .� a� p � .� � C.
� �� Q .� °' o ° •�0 ro �a E a � � �a E�-� 3 3 � '��-° ¢� 3 '� �� Q ,E
�3 a� c� ^o a� a� w a� -- a 0. .� ^o N a� a� a� 4» or� a� �v
Y °' � w � 'c ° E.�., � ° U � � � � � � ° 5 � >
v o -o �� U 3 0 �� �a s� �� o
�v � � � 3 cn �: o Y � 2 3 .� E �c � � .� � 3 CO
p. � .a 5 c .n . � „ � � >, .o a � Y ca
� c� c�i � � '� ro ° � � � �� �a � �3 � � � � � '�' � N ¢ti
d E c „ a� � � , a�
on
� R c� O � " `° c'"a � � .� ° � a .°� ° o, a�i � � °' ° � � � c
� C � a" C�. '� °D O. � m � � Q � R. � G � � '� ❑
� � � !�'6 +�'' ,� O a� y .� � -d � a�i � �' � � pp '� '"' -q c�e
�n 7
L Q � � � � o '� � -o o ,'�, � > � � o a, a. �? � -° c � o Y � c
+� � a�i c° � � a�i '� � � � � '� � .� � � � w � � Q .o � 'ro '
� �
Q 'B � 4� G. y aLi G � i u, � .�p Y � � � 'C .� a`�i � -o °�' cai
e`j � �� ¢ .E o' o o •~� ro �a E a y � �a E�- 3 3 ° •�° Q�' 3 � °�' o
�
�
� a� c � ti a� a� a� a� �n v b
,L o U � � w � � � y � � �
� 'a a� o CO •° a� � a� '_' w -� o � c 3 �
°- � �3 � c o o .o i �
H M ai�p c�o � '� ca � U �� „ � 0 3 � � �' °L'
> !�4 � ., � r= '�" a� Y � v � .� 7 iC v, ¢
� � �
!yE (� �'' C1 G1 " 4� pp L C .� C .� v � •� `� � C
bq
l6 � � �a y C y, ca � ca v 0. N G. °J
O =
O � C
d N V � � � � � 4" iC U a � ¢, ' O 0. � � cC
'Y bA � � C � >
Q � R� � � 'D G. � f1 ' GO � s�. rn 'O 0 0..
O cd N '�+ C
� �- c�C N � � N bA ' v� 4r vi cd i' cC i.
U � � • � id O � O C N
.`�- � O � � � O• 7 S1 � -C � � ''' � � c�.i
v� 'O O A. E-� rn A. id .�7 � O
N cd � N `�'� N ^ � [,� ,� 'b v1 N N � `+"' bA N N
� .y � � � a; � ,� o .� � o U � � > y � o c � > � CO
� �� Q, '� i F-� '3 0 •'c a, �
-do � ? � °' .� �, on �, o ,� °��° Z 3 .� ° .� � � .� � � �
N C � � �° a .o . � . °� v°�, � �° �
> � � •� L � � -o w � N -��a � � �� ^ U � 3 � � � � � � on
c c �; o
R � � o a 3 •v ..c o on � a� o a '� �, � ^ ° � 4 ., �
� E � N � 4. y a' .� � " � -o � � a � � � ,� �' � `�
y a �'C � o �, c 3 -o `� � °J E °' � on � ;� = A-'
++ o � o a� � c � ay v^, o � � � � `r �
Q d c � :y a 4• � � � � `� � `� � � � � � .° � � .
> N � � � � � i� � � � � � id w w � c� Q o `a �,
p•x � � � 'N .°n � � � � �= a ,E � �, -o ., c -o ; '� u
N =_ E � '> L
w a ; > c � .� -c :; 'Q, � o v ;? i o -o '� t a�i o � � o.
� �� Q -o � -v o ° •�° ro ro � a � a �a F- 3 3 ° •.�° ¢� 3 � a. ��
.. ? � ° � � •`=" � c � ? � _ �
c �.,, °' �., �
� Q) y,�,� � N O � � fd .S� C� "d � -p
R�
� fl. '-' O � �'' � 3 a '°q '� +-�' � a o
� o �a c'^ -o ' � � 3
� am � a� � � a o 3 �, "�cn ,c
� > ;� s� � � '_ ,� Y �,
y p " o
�, oo ' a, o � i ¢ � �. ~ � �
a o .� .= L � ��, �� � � :� � �� � �
z � � a� a� a� a a� � � o � � a a�
� -o o � � ' °" ¢� on � � °a, .� ¢�
r+ U � .� Q .�, O V V � C O
�' ..�. .'C''.+
C� V ,� .a � ,� N �
. N
O fl. o, � a�i � � c�d P, ^b�p O. v�i �
d � -o y � 'a o o, .adi C a�i c�a L �
�
��p � � v� y � �n cd � ,� o i;
tn � o a, � y c °a ,� a
o y �. E ^ c g o ou o � �,
a., a, • •� e�n '� �,, := c,, .b •� �
° o°, � � `° � '�= � � o � o °� a.
a H � 3 w �a o � w F'�-� 3 °o, .�
N
�
O
y t' � 'n �
� 47 � � O�i
� � O
y � ¢ � o
C N
� O fA � C� �
++ L Ci., G]„ �Z
a •C � � N=
� W mU
� a�
�n '�r
g•,�• n:
�o ,� �
<
O '
�� ^ � 3
a
�� � � �
�.� o� �
�. m
�
m .
� d `ti � .�� o o � � � � �
� � w c� c � o 0
� � °. a v � � '"'a
� � � N w �p � � .��, f�/!
� ¢ o aa d �
o � o w rn o _ a
w N � � � � a a� aa � �
-�i CD �' `�3 � -�i 'C O
C� cv °- � ^+ cv
o � �p
w � �• � �
O. �� o �' c�o � ��
m n crc � � �
o �' � a o Z
n: �' �D tt � � 0 y
a. Q- �� ° a � �
'� � �' < �
w' �
�
� m p '�—�
c tr�o �. � � �
a � �* w � �
�
c�v � G. c�o �
ro o
� � � o
io o. � K p
o. � � � n. y' �
� � � � p� = c�o D
� �
m � �, N �' a cp O o
a
a. w '^_ � � p N� �
p, v' � cu n. 7. � � <
n a' w 3 y C �
� N
p. � � y N
� � �
d �� �
'� �� ,,�� � �- H w � a- � � �' n � �� o �. � �� t-�o c''o C a� � � m "�
p n � � � � � N tn co � � f) OG '� � (� '� N G. !c �
'p3 f�D p> N �t � t�i� �] � N � � � � O.. N � N A� � � n
� v�i � � A.�. .�+, '�-. � p� ^ -�i � � ,.�.. tA�i N � � .A�-' �-t '+ Q� Uq ,.�.' "�
O � O C � O D
°' °' n A- � ° ,c<c io o � `��' �o w � � � CD �' a� � � o � io � A 3 n 'O ..
� � 'C � �.
o � � � �.' � a. � �• �-�s �� � r O � `i�' � v`�,' � G. �n c''o � y fD N � 7
� �+ -n � � iv v v, ic C ?: � v� c _. � � vfD, •o o- o m w caD �, O VJ G;,
w � � `' w 0. c� o' V � � � � �' 7 '-• � � o w � `� � �' N � � n ID
:; � �? � e � ?» � ° � �� �p c �, n. °' .v � � m d m �,a �
o 'ti w co `.., � N 5' � n, � •� � p^ —
� A- � �- � 7 �p � �' �. � � � p p, � � �• N � - � a V �
5- � 5' � �T G �' S' o' c�c � � = o o C7 c � '<' � �� °Q ? �D
co co uo o -i v o. 5" aa � v, w in' n. ., �„ -, a. co • ° ao K v, V
,�, �� „�, � w '"� p= � � vw, ^ � v�i � G. � � c'c � w � = w ^-1 N
,D .�.i fo 0. N R � 'O �. p ? � C A. A- 0. � � a '� � a � c�7D
� � N oc w o m � � �,' � �' � «o o Cj �` p: '+ g CO ua �' o tD e�D
n ., � �o o• �' „ a 5• o' �; �• ., � O D �
,a o � � � � � � a, � � � p'- � ro � � � � � �o fD � �� ' �
o � � ., �' c. � w � � �, � �o � � � '� O .. 7 � �
� cro a o w w o � � w � �. � � c ^o C � ?; �°�' d 7 � � �
."�. d � ¢. � � a, � � c w �, � o a�o � � � �, � a = � �n �
`-, o .o � �- v q � �v � � c � °' � ^o � n� � .p 'C
o a 'T? ., 4D •, 't3 cn � a 7
° °' � — " o o' w � — a �' o ,_°'-. �' � � _ -+ �- n
� c 5� 7 �: �' c o � �o �' <� � o- c < � o g. °��°' � '�
co co aa v', �n co n. � io co a C� n`. co • -, ao v, fA
C
� �y w m � w • �o w - � w a� w m o `+ C � `- � � � � w o- � �o � m m - � o a ,� �
,b .��, co o. � � cu � o, o � = n. a a � � a. °c � ?' � n. c ,��, � CD `D ° N b co � a c��o �. � �
� rn `� °q �' o m � � �' � w. cNo cro �� d � r. ^� o y � � � °- o a'• 'o ° o. � � w C o. � " D `�
a' a. (� ;' �� � �� � a � � °= ° � � �, o- a. � � �c o � `� co � � p- w �' � D n
� w CD c� :s � �v w c � � �, � � a ce � O
o ° o ., a � w ?: S :' • '� � � p. �' �' 'b n '+ �
�' n. ,� c° b ' � '� �. � �' v, � �, 5 y m �' � ��„ � N �� 'o co w � �
� � o w w � � �o p, a' ao �" � ., cs �; � co ty v, c =s a � cD � 'p
• o C7 � � � N ._ cv � �• N co o N� �' a � o �c � ao o N a o� '= C�
a, � a, „ � �' � '. co � • c- � � a ' = < �
c�c � c �. °- ,� �„ � ..w� m B o ti° �, w � � � � a'- � � ?: � � � � CD p oa O � N
o c � o � 'o �' `� ? � CD ¢' � � = 3• � �'o�� � � � � g °_ Z a°' w 5 � °�° � � N �
� o � C� ,.� � w
°, a —: `` ° ° � A� ?: " � v� ° ?: 2s � � � . p' -,
�- c �� � �: �: cs �o � io ? <� �- n. � <� � �' o � <' <� � C� o� w �' o �'
cc �c ao v� v, co n. . cc cc a C] a. rn tro .», co �o to v� a �' 'ti � - tc .., cv 9 Y
'-� y ' '� f c``o � °' °' C7 5' "r Y ^d o Ci7 'v � Cd o c``o C � p, � -'rt', c-`o c � 07
�' � ^ - v, to '° v�', -�, tro a pi � ,o w �n " � o o g ° ° a� o. c�o
� �p "� �. A� 'O G N �i � G. ,7 n C � �p n ,y O- '—'. C
� � CD ,`D�., � �' c �' � '� °�- 5' ° � � � `� � � � � � `D a- � a '` =�, D
o A', � -, w cP C� � aa o� �� _ �� p- ' • �
„ <' c� ° N � � � w � � � �,' � � � ° ° � �; g � �
� co ° � � � a- o a °.y a' o �° n ^d � �' � � .-. ? x �
cc � co �-, co n. m �'' � �, �. oo' " C. y
a �D °� � o C a 7� � � � � a�c � w C =
� c v � � � ?» � o �o � �• � �' N � ° N � � '� '° � �, y �
a � � � �o � � w w � � � -, �y o co � �p �
'� � o w• ?' �. � a � � � o '' � 4� o w � " � °-°- �' w
�
� v�,' � �a o. a`�a � w c�o °, a�a c�o c�o d � a d 5' �� � n. c�o n. ° 07 rn � v�",
�' � 'ti �• 's 7 5' F 'b o � R^' w � o'o' ? .�r
� °c � �' �' :; � � � co c. �°o � � � `� CD n
p. � m �' w o. ? � -CDe ° � w c° �
� �• o � �• � �, �' o y D
`D � ao m io -� CD cr oo � � a � ac w � � •* ,..
.o � � �, �• �, r N. �y � 0. � � �
o w �y c. �, o ry �y � o 0
o � � <' �� � a. rn � °= �,' �, m ¢' � t�o ni
o c �' °° cc �a o � �' �v co � �, � «o �o � y ..
m � o � • � w` <'
.� � C� � o � o a. C� a- � CD F � ° � � �
o a p; �' � aq o w � V
�.. ' � � C .vCDi << � � ry O � ^ 0. G �
� � G. O �- � G. �p A. �7 Cl
O O.
.n-. C7 � O � N C� � (�D � � '� O �-�i
CD ('D
t� 'U � �v �• � � � -� � �. � �c1 0 � w � � w T
�
o. `° � � a o. v co a � �c CD c � co a � �o a co c,
m -+
� m ❑� w. =R � � �' ao � �n � � � �. � =° o CC cra � o D
' 3 ao � �; � n �; <' ° � °' oro a� � �; < ^ = D
� �' "� �' � � CD � �' � 4y — � � o ° � � � N
� �+ a'_ � � o �' � `� � p�� �' 'fl c � � �p �
`� w n. io o a, � CD 2s � w ? m a o' ,� " '° y �
S- � o �' ° °' � ,°-n CD � w ic o � � c��o � a =
cc d Oa ?.' io � � � G, � a � o.. � � � � p' `� 3 f�D
�+ c�o 'LS w 'b � r�n -ni � ^ ¢' � `0 � � 00
o °c � -, o o ° a � ° °Q < ^o � � ° Q, o�
� �� w � o.: y c w � p � co
o p- � m �° o °�. � " `' � � a c �. �' o .- �`
� o � � � • �o' � �' � a' �Q. �'
n. c�o � G. v G. O. o�o '�' v, P'_ �' c�y �' c'�o • ° ao � w'
w �• �• � o 'v 'o � o � o m � —3 °= 5' �' � � � o C ° c°'o
cn � w w � n. � � c��o �. � o. � = � � w w � "r �. .�°. `��° � � D D
w o w � '� �� ic .'
o � S� w' . 'a
_ < °' � `° � s ° �' „� c�c � � ¢ � w � ^ ° � O � �
cc = � oo. `� w o � � � U° ? ?: � n N � �
O O �' ''� � �' � p � ��,. � p � 4' � � �' � w �< � o
o � � `� pai ti � � � � p= �° `� �G C � w ,�» O cD � D
c�o� °- � io ("� n' ?» v, � ?: � a � b7 � io N � N � m
o°' N c'' �, tro < ?» ° ca,c w � w � w � � �
�m '3' o. � CD �' � �, � ° � °i � °:
�� � c ^ � 5- � < o� � w. � � � <� �- <
ry a v, �o c�' d �' co co co .� co v�' co �' o. 5' �c co �p
�
y
� � �
�
� � � a��i N �' .� � .��6 `� o�n � � o o � y 'c O � U y ° o° � ro � � °�° � °�' �o
� °' '0 6 c° o o ° '�, .� .� -o .� � y Z O c � o � � � cv �
� :3 ° � Q, ai a � c 3 3 Y 'ie � �'" a°'i o ? � o `� 3 � � � �o
d f/� c ` � � y � p � '`" -o c � � � �a°° °, c� � � .� � � " 'a�i �' v � � c. m
> d O ..o `� > �o s�. � . a� �a O 'i. � -o � � � '" ,� o � �. Y �o I
w > ;a -o � � �a � -o ,w- � �c � � °' o � o °«�' '� � „ �: a <«. � � �c
� �+ l6 vi � y � � 0. L � C cd '� p O, t-• � O c"d 'G v' � � �> p O .�- �n W�
� � v � o ° � o � a .^ °A u o � � 3 � �° a� .� � `' '� u � �
y L J � � � N � � U � � � O � � O � a�+ � • Y � C�.' ¢ C�.' � +��' � � � �" 7 ��
a �' U � °' �, .v Y o � � 4"-, ° o -o Y '�, o � ,� `� � ° o° ,° U .°�' 2s � � E � � � �
Q . � a� . a� -o �a � a� o a� c ro � � � :; a� E �
C ��e c �a a -o ;; �v :� a •—, =o
c4 °' � '� a�i � > `� ep °� �? w �a � v� ❑ °, ' ca � � o o ca v � ;: c'
E ,� c p ca � a� a� `� w a� o o � E L � a � �, �, a� ,� m
Q . � R: �a .c a� � '� c '� .� o C .fl ='o � a . a� cn a� � � 3 a on � U � �
O
a� � �, a� y � �a a� o N a� � "-
0
� � � � CC � � "� 7 L � � � N ...�'.
� � � � > .� N c�C p � � � U 6" � V
(� � �, � . N tn
++ N iC C N ¢, cN V �n U O s.. �
r � � ° � " k � � � .fl �o ¢' � a� 'o
co .a -d �'" � � � O �o o w -o a. � �' .� �
L Q) ^.3 "O > L z yc0, '�, � � .D y "O
O � rn bA rn O a� r: 'O
Q � � 3 °c�, � '� � ° .c � 0 3 0 ° � P: ° o
Q `� Y o °' �' � " '�a o0 0 on o 0 3 a
� " � �a � c � °'° " 5 ` ° 'a � " o
�a c U - a �, �c a.
on °� °' `� c o � �� O a o °' � o ,� °' �
Q .E .� � � a °_' -o � � � � on 3 F� ,� .�
v v �.. a� c k a� a� a� � a� �, �v v
� `� -v -° ' O -S p � L -� ,� ro -� � :y
� � y
�, o � � � ,� z � � � � � � �
� � � �, � ' = o � -� y � � �- � �' �
d � cC �' �' 'b � V o.. .G O
� � � O tG. �"' �i. c�d O sV. 7 N ..� U U cd
i+ N y 'O � y� c� � pp � � b�A �
�p d 'C3 Q N � � � ci..., 3 CL '�7 � �
C � � 'O > cC O iC � O s. .D 7 .�' � � N
� y� � O � v, N L' � y O c�C �
�+ a> � 3 o c ;� `' � � � o -a o 3 v� ai 3 � °'
Q v � � o ' " � �, o on o �� on � o � o � � '�
0 on
� � ro o. � ,D '� � •� :b •� " � � p, :d � � � �
.� .�
U Q .� � � � °o, .� a�i an a�i �a ° .� -� cn ° E-'�� .� o �c
� � U � o � a� � � .0 k � U � w �n a� N p p� ,� � N
� N .. � a� p � o o�o .c � � :�
� ro °n � i � o N ° � `� N z > '� o � � '� � o
y � �v -o ro � � � a . � �, o on .b o . � � � o �.
j H °� � � � :', •o �- � ..o � �' �^ .� � o " � � o v� � 3 �o
� � «, ep o on �. ,.o a� � i� o -o � �, a� .o
� � c 3 �, a o Y °' v �, `*' � 'o o � �
` y � °q � ° '° � ° o � N `° a��i ,� � ° �' � ° °� �
a� k -�' o � -o o y 3 �. � .� '� �, �, o. N o � a� ,� 3 � a� � o �
+. � " Ca a� a. � a � `J }; y c � � � � o o • N
Q � � °" � ° � � � .. y o � •° °G^i0 •° � '..' -o o � ° X a�`"i �,'�' � �
a� � a� n, .� ro .y a� ,o a. �e � Ts � :� a s�. �o a� � � �.
•C � � � � Y � �+ V1 C � � � +'i L � O. L O O I-�+ � L 'l:' � � �
a �, �+. �a . Q . �a a � . a� oo a> � � 3 a. on U E-� o+ `�° �
c°'i c � � �' c c � � o ,c Q o c�n � � o � y �-
p y � " Q, .� y � � � � ax°�i � � � c`'d � .7 -o
C � E a� E "' � � °� a�i � U on °A � � �' � �
pl � p `' � � � C � � ,� U '� o U ,� o� � '� a. •� •o �, � ro
C i. �cd � �
•L � i+ � O G ' bA � N O. � CG � c�C
Q- � L -o °' � � " � �o 0 4, Ts .� � 3 � � a" °' °�,' � o N � a
Oc � z �a o � � � a -o y
G� d � o � '� � �; o`o � o o � � 4.�. ?, ,. a °�,' � � y
(� a � y 3 0 � ;� ° � E o 3 a �a � � c°i � � °o. � a� � o
�' Q � � o i " � y °' � o. .� aD 7 0 0 0 0 '"- w° 3 y
�a on
Ip ,� � o. � a�i a � °�° U � � c � o '^ .o o � °' ? °_' � °'
C pp p, � '� � .�. cd s. O CL iC y � c�d y '�O 7 U a) � �" a�i
� � .� � � � a. °�,' •c � � ° � a. � � d � Q P: � � H .� au
fj � � � � �' � � y � o ,c Q o � o�n � -a o � w `o �
r.+ � � � +� � o ca y � .� � y ;.6 �I" O � '� .O O
V � � � y �" � N � U q U �� � � GL � R � LS,
Q � N � > .'�.." c�d� L �, �� � �° O '� pp b�A O � C aJ O
� ; � � � � � O � ,C a�i A. W v �' � U 'O cd r�'i, C 0. .� .� c�C C a
G> 'a+ a C � � i, y ^ X � ,n � � Q' p� O � ro � � rn C1. y
> ca N O � -o °' � � O � c ,� .d �, 3 �a E Ci a� N o � �
'a L � � .p o � > N � Z � .� o o � � � w � .c � � -o .� y .� �
�; � y fA � N '� o a � � ° � a �a o a� a
L �'�`,� ° �' oa � '� � � ,�, ° � o oA � -� c c`�i .� o o a�i �' 3 �
�d,, a � d � « ° � ,� •� .� � � ao n. .� o`n � .o o - � �, ,o � .
Q: c� � c�. id a� q a� ❑ V � �' CC v, ° -C o � � � � °' a�i
Q � � � � � O � � � O�, O � cC c�C y "�O O U � �� � G.' � O
c:i Q ,� -� ;� � a P: -o > �a � � c?, � � d u Q � � �a F- .� cn c.
�
�
� � � � °' � � 'v °' � o � °' �' o
i+ 'O � v Q � +"C.+ s" cd 7C.+
d � cd .� � y �. �
� 'O O � 7 A. rn � U � � O 7 � N
l0 M .. C � N > •� •`n ca � ;: � . � C y 9
� o �
� y v t6 ia � � ,c a�i a. � � �N � � � � � �
> m o � +r � 'o E ., on � a� °' � U '�a N ,.
'a+ 0..� . C s. y k C v� � �O O O N �
�c fn � � � -o c'' � � v�, O ^c3 o w ^o o- -o � �' � �
� c � d a 'c > °�.' 2 � •�, o � .b •-- � -o �
v E y � o °�,' � o °° � o a� o � � �
y �' � E � � 3 o c � ° °' � 0 3 0 3 v� ai 3 0
a ,. y y �.
QO � U � � ia � � `� �° °" � � � o � ° `� � a
� cd a� c a� � U � a. � � � �
'�- a � 'D o � •� o. �a �O � a' �
Q ,E t :� � a °: -o � � ° � oo ° F� .� '�
a� � �. a� y � -o a� � � o N c �- a� on -o y'�' �
� c � `� -°'o � � o � Y ` '�' ^� °= �a y � � > � � � v
� U cC
-�p p—�, ° E � a� � � N � � .n �? °' c � � 3 � � o c 7
= L C� ? . CC Y+ N U L�' CG � � bA L VI
N � f0 � N N i0 C a�i p. w '� � � p � N � N � � N n' �, aNi
� +' y '� � O � ^ bA � � W � � i, � � a� cd
� d y O .d � " N k :� G w � � � � � o � �� � � �, �
O �v
� � C9 f V � .� ? � P_' z � •° o � � ,s � � 5 � a� � :� -c >
�- � o � � ov � o � ,� � � � � � �
�: o � C `�° " � � ° � 0 3 ` � � � a�°i ai ° c
Q m � y 3 0 � y � -S � N on � c '- " � � � • 0 3 .�
a�i X � � a � ; �� �° °�° v � c � 'd .c � � CC v �o � .a � � ro �
� w �� c'' � � � o � '� p c'' �`° �u o � � a� o o v, ' 'o � a. �
d .� � � � a, P: -o > � ° � 3 ° U �a � 3 3 .�' � s�. F- .� �
a� a� � a� C k � �o � w v� s, -p r�
V > ,� C � O bq �
e- G1 � � � > � N r� � � `�' id � � 3 y,
> a. � � -a � ' ;: ° ° „ � o ° � `� -o
r O -o �? � � o '� � � o � � � c
� �� '� � �
c � � o a, � � � � � � � = � c' -o
d a�i � 3 � � :� '� °�,' � �� o, y °' � .E a� a�
++ p � Y a ,� " �? � o on °' � � � o -o >
a o � � � � �- o � ��, � � -� ; � ; ��
Z Y � � a � � v �. � �
Q .� i � � � .� � on > � � 3 H c � �a
� � o en v � o N
� r,+ .r � � • ❑ ❑ o cn
a� � � � �o y '� � � �
.p a ` w � N � � � � o .�
� � �
a _ � � -o > �- � o a o .� o
O tw a� cd
� .l6 Ul 'r'�n p � � �-' 'v� bA r�i� •v �
y �+ d � 0. "' � �� O. 7
C � cd O
Q-r *' � �, �O � i� � i � � �
O p � � � � ,y cd k bA U �
a �. �, ,� O ¢' O a� O N U
a � .a F� 3 a. .� Z � > � �
� �
y C f3 � v .. �j
> d � i� � p 7+ 0' o�i
i+ � � � � v� � Q, � O
C
� O vl � � � � � �N
.� L .� � � � �Z
ao �j a ¢ G° Q ~ a,T
n ��
�� �o',`.
�a � <
.��.,o w �
v'y � fy/! j
O cQ � � �
O � � 3
� � �
��
�7 p� O ''� '� dC+� O p � �
I a � � w �. CD � � O O
� U�C � '��' � '.. n. .� �p-p
� � � p^ ° •'�►, f�/!
o a. �v o � o �, a
u, � � � ° �`o A- �
,� 3 �
� � o c��v ° ��.
�' N <i p� �, (D� � C'!
aa v� o w ic �n � ,�
� CD � � o w f� � � �. c�v � Z
m ., c � y � o. D
wco � -�n °' �O � � �. o •`; G
� `� o � °-Qi � co in � .'
� �
� c �' �' ^ � C7 °' � � �. � � �
� °' 9 °° v, co '� w, o =
� v, �' �� w -� 'd Q, 't7 ° 'C <
�, �° p' � y n -�oi � (p
� d < C a UQ •, � p�. 7 �
j- C D " ,�' N �. ;S � C• .r
v�' a -e' v�, aa 'v� co �c �t
ao �• � o o ua � � N co y o [
� w =° � c o- _ � U � 'O co a. k �
� � ,.�.,� � '� �' O. C/] a � ,.�., .�.� y fD
p 0 dQ C7 p�' � <
C � � p�� o' � � p� <D �
O. C � p �' CD UQ � RQ o p ? 3 (p 0 �
W . P+ S •e vr, Q -p �D
� 0. � ^ � '� o, � �b �' o w ►v 'n� �
� a' �• �c o <. cc tra 'C �' o O � <p �
N � � � �• v�, r � cD � � �. � �, L'
� � "` � � a w y � � `" A: ca d C �
� G. ,.�.. p' v�i � C' 3 N
w CD � o o � � � � � � �9 � �
< a' - c c w '" 5' � � �' �' � '
co o �� �- o. v�, � vo � `G cu cc
� ' -� N oo zs � g iv �o a ^o �
� �- o -, '� o w v� k ° �
c N
�• � c��`o � �. o �" � c��o � � o.
•z Q � �. � GL � �y n.d �t n
7� w. O �
o � ? v�i a' � ac, a aa �-n a- � 3 � O D
?' c° � o CD w '� �. o ° v, y � � � �
�„' n, 3. '. c "d N o. ,� � � N ID 3 7
w � � � a o• ' � C7 �d � � °= � � .�. f/� o�
;; � o o � � aa [-• � CD � io � a► O � <
� `� �' n � • � � � � — � n co
�, R.
=' � � � � ,� o w� � < �'� — � c"' c�i
�
rn p� c �' o ° <' c a, 5' 3: � a �
� � w � �
�� � � � �' �9
� `G c5o v�', c�o v�i fro .�- `G cc cc V
�
�
�o cro -� �n � a o v,o v,� � � N X y �a [ N
� �' �' o n. o m in ° �
�• w y ;; � c a. = c. .�° c � c"o '� co a y
� � � a � a o• � � ° c. n c- b � `; c�D
� o � w o a. 6. � y �� °= � O D �
� � C ^�i C O � A� � � � n� N� <D fD pl
� 0. � � "'S VG w C o N G. � � o � � 7 � r►
� � � `� � � � r• O � � Oa � ro cv � co � 7 'p '= <D,
A,� co p� c��o r�'`�n O r' ^ U' o C� '�-' w (p � G� <
� - � c� �
`� '� ; ❑ � � y a� �; F °' `D �P' �
w o w .n a °� n o n. � • � � � N
�' o � m � n. � ° � ` � � � � n' c>
� �
�o w �� o- a' �'
' a ° `G °, a�c �' c�o v�i c�v v�, ao � `G to cn =
Uq �] V1 � � � Uo '6 � � N k � 'LS �" �
w w � � c _na'. � n. -°o c y "� rn 'O co a �
� � � �. a � _. o � � � � � � � D �
-� -� aa o' aa � c� °' y' �
a.
0 0 � n ° w �°n � � vo � a o �' � D (�
� c � c ,� o ,a w � s �, ° N cD � O
N a � ^z v� C „� �, n. �y r, C� 3 �
� � � � o � °- ° �' � C7 .v 5- � �= �'o o; �
� � � � � �' o � r � � � � � �
<' �
wc�i `+ co v� o � �'` � H o 07 � � � N
<• �p .� � ryq � ^ � v�i � C' w � 0
^s O O.
� N W ? O. � � � � -Crs Q � ,� N �
� `G �y dQ .r` c�9 �Ni, N t�/�. W J. 6 N N
w w � � � �. a,o �o � � v� �v Co �, �- C
� co w o o m (� � m cs �
`-�° �, � :; � � 'c a � � �• � o � D
'" �' �` � X ° °Q a � °° � � � co c� � n
�• -, .
•CD � �a � � o '� v, °- � � cc a ^ `-� txe 7
�' m o c o 5' a x �O °= " O. d
a.
�� o � v� o ." �'. w � `ti n. � ° � � �
m � � � �� '�, �
o � � � � o �' c' va ° � � o�
w aa �
v, �o �s O O cn co v,. UQ V� l0 co .r'. N
A_�. 'O O � � W� (� p`� � O`� � O. `C ,k j- � �
� �' O �-s � N 7
� �. � � � �, �. � �, � �: �. � � y � a �
w � w � o 0 o°c x CD tro c�o �' a° � °- ,p p,' � u�i D
�� `-,° � o v� � Y o a .� " v°o � �: � �
a- c° � c � � 5' o � � �' -n � N 7p �
� ?,' n. �' �• G. '�' a° o °c vw, y a ° � a= m N
�' QQ � p � � C3. �' o N N �
�' N � p� � ° w -n � p, a. � ^v N � � p; �
O �' ,.o � `�' "� p�, n' 2s � t10 C7 � � � 3 v
., -� <' ,�
0 o w x' o � �. ° °. �� o, r, � �' F � a�
� co v�', '» � v�'i vo � � w� 5� �' o o- ' s
� a co �e �o � o -, . -, ao � a. �e � cn
;. � y o � b � � NX yo �
� �
`° .� � ° a � � � `" � � � a
"a � ° �°-ti °Q �' � � n � � °= ^ D D
0 o co � � °- c � � � o �. — �
Q- a, � C � v, n' � c�o � o � � 7
� N
'O pt' p, p ,7' d O p�
O (�D � O O n '� (1Q r � (D � fD � G
� G n . A� � � � 7
� N �=t� -�i � � ..�,.� O C7� � � �
v t�o •� � A� vw`, � y OD
<�
� � � O � � C C 0. � � N
� w
= b
� � � � � � � � � � �
.� cn � w m r- m � �. ^cs � a o c � o �- _ � � � .n � o` p: 7� �- 5' '-� � � a- � o � 5.
� � o' w o � � � v� � `< co � � v� � CD m �-,�'n �' io � aQ �D m < � � v, � �o � ° � co
c�`o w � ^ �' � cRo � '� co � �' o ^ � � °; a ° co �' a � io w � "� y' y' � w
cn �' r, CD �'' � w a �v x a �, � o' � c. =+ ,� o' �' �, N � :°, ° -�' �o' < � � D
(7 � o � �' � �' c � � �O w' �', � w �' o ° � m �' � CD � � � o co �' o» � �s � D
= p- o ° w `� °- �' � � � � � ' �' �, `� o � ?» o � ° � � � m' � ¢ �° 2s a � n. F O � �
Z � �-�i p. R�Q N 4' 'TJ O v� � � � n � p• � � n• � �• � P� �. � O ,..� N C n � '�
� °� o � x ° � � 3 � °° •°�, o i� � o � o' rn � '�' n. � � =' ¢' � cao' �`�° �' a `� �' N °� � n`. � °* < °: �
o� � n. �, _ � � � � � � � � w o a a � �, X � v�o � � ? ° < o � °' ^ � � io n. o � � fJ� � m
� co �
o .n � �, �, � <' ts � � m � � F ° � `° c c w `� ^ o c�p �
�m o � ° n. n. 'O � 07 co _ a. o- r. o o � o m a 5' c �,
�� � � - o c � c �' � -- �' �' x °: � � 5' ,�.�-n,� � � E w �= = � a � - s 5' � c � � �
ry�a co co �G .*, -, aa co ac C7 0 0' �' c� co 0 o co co ao Q. n. -e' `� co -� co � �n aa o co co �y
W y
� � �
� a� c v a� a� w a� on � -o o`�,�" — c a, -o � �o a� a� 3 y � a� c a� a� a; v on o.�
.� o � � ��, � a°i -S � • � a� ? ro o U a� � a� > � o . y o > � : y G o
G) aci U -� o w � � y � aci ° > � o�rn U .� o y c c�,i '� � � � � N w j c �a
+r -a � ro ? � -o ,. z a � 3 s �o o � o
d � c ; � � �, '" ° ` � � a ; = �? `" ° -a � > .°�' •� ,a '� � � ?, °= � o. � �
> G) ' s.. a� i �.. y ia id � ., cd � a. ' �d >, � �.. Y � a� ,,, —
'++ > y�-.� a�i � � '� .Y � � y `�-� W '� � o � `� v� � `° � °� ``" � m
L � f6 O Y N � L O � � O .. � O y ,� �' � cC � W(/)
C U A. N 'J �C � U i� rn w a�i cNC � `" a� ^Y' Y a�i � N � O cC v� � O
:: L J �o E > °a �a ° � ;� � E °? � = N c °" -° `�,° � o = a`'i E > n. �a � c m•-
y � a . � y � o,� o ° d a. • i � i: ° y o sa. � ,� � o, • � „ c ° ��
a a o, � F; �° .o � '� � y ,D N cC N � '° 7 = c��d '; y '��7 � i � � c��G c��0 � t��, '� o � .� b N m
° � � Y o ° E o � o � � a� � � � � a °' ° ' ° ' -c o a� �, E .� � `3 0 ° E o ° — �
a. F� -o �a u i� . v� � � � -o . .� � � E a. 3 3 3 F- � 0] � . E� -a � � � . � 5 �
O
a� a� • a� 3 a> -o � a� �
� � � � .y � .� � o .n °�' " Y .r
" a? Y � o
� � � , o � � a� � '3 -o 0 0 � U
� � > ,� �� � a .� a > o � �, o �o
:.. �a � °' � � 'b " 3 °' � o
; � � o � •o o a� o
'.r � �' � a � � 3 a, °��' y � ,� �' 3
C N cd cUd O 'O �, c`�c�C O id � N .'C-. cVd
3
+: � " � ° a. � a�i � � o � o E
y � � �
Q Q � � '> a w c�i � �a 3 � � . 4.`"0., c°�i
N � � N L ^f' � � C'i p 'y� � � L '�
� � '� '� � � �-+ b � � �� � Q
,""� � G �+i -�-� � V1
� �. � O � L Vl � Q+ OU ¢ •� �L � 1-�i
N N N N y0 � � O
Y .y .O .0 �
1.+
y � O � � � f�"i .D
n C � � ? y Q �
a> �� 3 � �
> •C ,.�. V p � E p, � � O
�+ N � � � 7 y � O .L cd
l4 d O. .� -p cC
C Q' `e � > N `d o n.
L � � , N �'�" N '^~ �
� � „C -- O ,-�-+
id N 'O � E 'C
a j GO a� � a� 3 .o c°�i
�j -o aCi 'r o -o a�i � ° � �
c p � � c p o � o 'o
� o. �' �c � n. � 3 3 °�'
^o o � �y -a o o I �,
� � 7 y�,�
ca � 3 � o � 3 � � $ `°
� N a� a� y o a� a� � C c
> > � � c� � � � G' � s.�..
r
C y � v' O" � c �' '� � CL
U
� CK N N .� N � � �i.
�+ G cd � N vi � ''�'' � v�
Q c~d � U � � O cUd
� � � .
� j � N O. > 7 ,-., A.
f� .� �� � .� F� .� �� � 3 .�
> i :� � o .x °�° o ,� 3 � � �' > � � 3
� � � a� o ,� �a -- a� o
.� a� �o .y �? �c ,� � .d �, ,�, �� ,c ^
`" �3
p � C � °° � on o U on � � ,� o Y 'Y '7 �' o y
N o o � � � � �, �, �, � 3 ,� 3 0 � �
�� > :r 3 0 � � a � � c � � 3 � � a
C' ca L > .y � ° � ° � °' °o' o °= °�' > � o '�
� � V '�' v�i y s, �.. y ,� .> � pp p cd in
O d d � � O c�C � T 'a � v� � s" G' E O O
(„) +� a' � ti o. � � c�i U ai — � � ,� j Y � 0 c,..,
�' a Q � Y .� ° °o° o ° °�° o °' ,� °N' °' � y c
o] � 3 �a
� v� cC O � � ;.Q ;� 'ro s�. cC N ¢ i vi N cd y L
� � � n' L O 'r�' TS O '��' ,� cC T U O y .� N a' p O.
� H �a .� 'S 3 v� Q 3 v� F- °' � .5 a, � F- � .� � ��
7
� � � '� � � a�i � ° � o � � ,� � � i o
v .� a� °' b .y �? b � _ .� r, '� � _
to � -e o`n � � o U � c � 3 a � y ,v '� o �
E m c°�i R o � � a� � � � c 3 � 3 0 �. � �
G> � O.� � 3 0 °= � � � y � o a � � 3 � � o.
> � N o � � Y �' o � o � c'' � � � .o � o •E
�
.a d a�i � w .� � U � T � � .E .� � L � � � -cs °�'
_ " Q `1 fn � i: � c. c`�i � " C„) :� s. o ai � °' ° �Mp
� v ;; � c " °' � .o ? y � 3
.,�+ a � � �a .5 y •� ° o°n o ° o°n �° � c�i °N' °N' � �a � y �o
c
Q � � cC O � � ;.� � � L cd N � y�, y cd O t-
� Q" s��. O � "O O c�C .� � T V � y .0 � a � O.
�j F-� � .� '> 3 cn Q 3 v� E- ?? � .° a �a F� � .� ° �c
�
ti °' � ° °' � 3
� � ^' � � � � o
� � � � .� � � � ^
� i"� ai� c�a a N � � � N 3 �
„ Id O L a� O L �
> c�a o � +r 3 � CO 3 � � �
c E
C fn p � � � ti � � ? � o .
� a C� E N �' ro ^ O, L 'C s.�.
N O �O
Q � �' � �' ,N � � .E �' � �n 3 C
U `° � � � `� �' ro o '�
y � = � a, � �e
� ¢ � :� � o c�,
� � .E � F- � '� � C
a� co � � • � C G. .� -C N v a� a� ca I ^ ^ C 0, .Y
` � .� � .� � y Y o U 3 0 ;� ,� � � a� .� � � � o U .3
'o �
°> -o .� � a�'i � z 3 � � a� °' ,E �o . � tY�n U
N � a � c�u .N ,s � a�oi "c ? � > c 'D �, " z a�
O .'L. 'C
d � L c � c °�.' -a o � �� �a a� 3 � � � c �; �v ° � � �E �
> .. � ._ � r� � a� � . •� 'o ,� � � � a c �° °' '�
� C � c p� a ° ' � a� o° �. a�°i � � a, °3 � o � � � ai o
� O c� �> a� a�
� � � N c° `� ? � `� � ,b ❑ � � .� � `� o � �, � `°
r� fC N L (C
r O � C .� C W � � E � N O N � � � � O O N CY N in
Q � ;i+ f6 `� p � a� y Q' N p G" ¢, .> `" ¢' � '� O �"' � �. � � y C
� y i `� ° � `� c° ° � a .� � � -o N L '� o � 3 � � 7 .o
N +-' �' y :.� ,a N .y C .- �
� W C " N cC Sr" ^ N y,0. N � � ,f' � � G ^ N 0 O � C1. � L
� 5 Q' �o °J F- �a � n. -° .o � E-� � W � � Q -a � 3 �a �a � a.
a� o o a� � o I �,
y 7 � � 7 �
� �1 � y `� 3r
� G� � � � � � � C�O
d � ay�i GL v� 'O Y �L 3 b
'rr O cd •� v O � ,� y � ^o
� N �n c� i- O
rC. � � 3 v� iC O p, c>C
a�+ Q � � � 'p � N � ~ �
Q N O '� � 'O � O � 3 'O
Z = a � � � f.," � � O O
� � -S .c � � � ° 3 3
v '" � 'Y �� � � � '� i o ° o
y � 'o �' °' � .� ,Y � �
.o Q Q � � '� � � .3 .3
d � -o > L � � -o ; '�-' ° � '
�
c�i ca p '�' ° o o N � o o �o w° �
(A i7 �. w p,
O � p � � .> � � � 3 � b
O.y GL 'O � U rn O. 'C � U G � �
G��. a cyyi � ° o o. °' .� o o p' ° a � �
L F-� 3 n. .� 0. F-� 3 a .� ° •� .n �
o ^
� y O
d � � ~ N O
> � � � � �
C � N V � � N
� O w �a1 � U �
O �
=' °� � ^Z
o W m � � mU
� _ a�
�n
o..c.
�o ,a �
<
�O � y�
o� to c �
�� O � t�
�
m�� w �i
�d —
�
m . .�
�7 � � o o s -p �
� a: °�' � n. �o � 'o
m " � a= ,�p � N
o'
o w � 5 � �a
w co
W � � � G' � �
"' 'O O
.�, �* � � f9
.��►
� � �• � � �
F `c' � C
o : �c � Z
n. n: o � � D
� � � � �
o' ,-. �'
< w p�' v, � 3
O �
�
Q- � t3 � � �D
tv
. � � � � �
c �, :' 7
��Di, o c�o �
c' a � w � s '° � .� w `c' � Y � � C o o � w � �
w v, � � ^ � � v�, � ^ v' � N' °' o �' � CD � � X
N Q' ¢ o � � p Y ' w ?; 0. ,� � -, � � � o � �• o � 0
. �s o' c�
= o co � �c ° � `� � c�o � � o � 3' �' � ° o �� � ° � = o D
p, in � �o w y � `+ p �'. = � � co G.� '8 �
,�. � '� a' N ^ N ."' � � p �' j- '3 a' N +n � 7
w �,� ¢ �o o �' c � o � � o o � �,• a -o � � 3 °:
� o � . � � � � ,� p o . cp ,� <'
p'_ � � p' � `� ,�, a io � �, � � 5� w cn' 7 � <D
co � � � � . o � �. � � C N
0
m � � � � °' Z cro' � � �' � °Q c�o o. w � �' � � O.
c co �' o g (� w y ^o 0 o w o 0� �
�. w � c _. n o• � � w ^ � �, �• � c 3 �
v�Di c`�'v c�o v, Q. �' 'C � � v, � � w co I o �o v, n.
w � � � n
b < N
� � � � � �OD
�' `� °= y3 � � o
�a o �' �° c� � � �
�
� �. � � 3 c'� °�',� °'
R �' �' _ uio � �
�
o. ° °� � °1 � w �
o. �' o a �
� c �D
w -wi a V
�
..i
� � � � N
�
N � �n p� � �►
v� W � n � D ;
� � '' '� 'O .► 3
�' � ^ ''� � 7 � �
v, �G"i. < � O fn N <
�,. �° � 7 'p = ID
� 01 <
-'• � O � - C! fD 3
o. C N � A .0
� w p. 7
p1
'o �. w fl' �
� � � N
C
� �� �' � 3
� � N �
o N � m D
�
�• R = D
� o `� � � � O
� w � � �
cn v, � fD � '�
�1
� O � Q �• 1
n. � 7 N y
�' v, a. p► �
O. ?, � �
w ?; �
. � � �
B � ' w �
� N. � � �.
� a
� � � � � � D
� � �
O� K �
� <p
== �. p� r, O. �
=
� � � y �
� N N � � �
P' O
C C
� O � G.
� � � � n
C � (D v'
� � C
�- y
�� � � � �
�
� o � � � �
� � � � d
� �,
�� � '<' u, <.
� o �D � N
�• � 7 V
�
' � O d
� C
� � ¢.
� � � � � � � �
� � N � � � � f�D
v�i � O � v� P� w t�il � D
't
N � � 'O � � � �1 fD
�p 'C � O � 'Lf �D �
o ^ �' v, w � 'O G .�+
'C ri� �.
� C � �n� o � cNv � fD
a
�- C �
� a o• a. _ a „� ao
0
. c�o cro° o• �� � °•
� � w� � �' � �
� � � F � `° � w w � o. 4y c C (� � v� o cr � ?_' fl- '� � o " '� F F � '° � �, °� ` o °-
� � • o • '' �c �° � w '� � = o -. n. n� � B o• o cc �- � o � . o . o � �s' � c�
c o ^o ts < co — rn o. � � c c"o c � �, c co co p� ^a < cv
;; � c �' < �; , � c w � w N: cao CD : � �' o n, � �D o o ¢, � S- c a- < �; � � � g w rn w y
cn n' �D p- �' � � � `' � o ?: ^ � o' w o' � � w a F � -,, � p- �� � '� w w� ° � o D
c� 'v o � � o� io a- � .`�° '� ?; � o � �, �� . �o _ 5 �o o N• � o' ; �o o � -o r►
= o � � � � �, � Y o' �; co �, a'_ 'v < 3 � ° i� � � � <' o � � r � ^►
� p� � .p V co � o � o � p rp � �o' �s � m � �v � �� cc o � c�i y fD
Z � -� ^� � �-n -e � �p K -�..e � � N O ,� � Fh �' K � 7 V
O ? -�i . 'Cf � � � O � '9 � � � y� n � -� . 'O �' N v�i � � =� � p
N � � �y• �'' • cc m c�', (� � � = � o w' w o o �' �„ � � �' M
w�
o � w �. �cs o a� � � w w �• -, � � � � o fD co ?'_ CD rn o o � w �', ^o co w . � c � � O �D c D
c�o� cv < � c. N � '-' � a v�D, `s7 P; c. v, �., w � � ?» � � � � < cv p- v�', � � � f/) � p
o m �� �, CD � -� o ^+ �' c,; w o. o � o a � F �� -� � � � o N � � � ,� to �
o � � Z �� � �. <' o ", � o � � �, � Z ac� e c �
�m o � � �. m' C� ?: ?: o o � � CD �n c°', N c° �' p: � ' o o °: � �. w' f� �' .� -- � o � � d
�� �' `<� co � � (� o' w <' � � �• �' S- � w � � � < o' � �,• °' �' <' rn � � c� o' � � o � � �• �
r v�t a c o c o a a `o o = c o n. a v c c c o m c v c o c o o c c I co c o a a `G � v`, � � a � �p
� y
�:�
�
� a� c a� a� a� a� on -o -v � � � a:;.: :� .b a� a� �- � � � a a� a� y a� on � -o. -N �, ��
� Y O � U ."' � �, .cC =.i fd 0 C) V Y � � � � . .y O � U . .,LJ' L. . � N O'1
� ' � �., 'N � 7 � ,� ,y' U a� � O. � � s, N � � C� N O
� � � 'U � o � � �� � o F-� �� U .� �o y `° 'C � � ccdi '� � w j � a�i � +`' v�i m�
� _�/� � -a o � o ? ro -o � z o a � � E �, ;o o � o � -o � o
y V! � �`" � � �, i-� CC P. � L Y fn 'O .� > «� �, a� y (a A �"' ca p" y '� � � (U
� G) >"� N L Ir p � •� •• fC � C1 CC � (C �O L � � N � L N � I
� Y � y y � rn N � rn �.�. 'a�-� � 4. �d � � C
�p 'y � '��i, C O cd C cNC � ...� Ci. �� �' ,� � bA � }+ �n � � O + � �D
C f6 V � G � � s, C �' 'O ~ O� y .-�+ v' C � � s. C � C ��
� C � � � � o � � o � � � N a a� � a o o a� � o � � � �o a� � �. � o
:; L J ° � > a. � � o `�' E .o > � ❑ � � �, �? a -o N � � o. �a s o E �? L�
� ' y a '«:� � � d a �. o, °' o o a� y c,, • � y c a 0
Q "' " � o � 'on � o �. �� o � � � s�. � '� � �c � � � � o �a �� � o �, �� o � c° �
a � � � � � o � �� � .� � � � � � � � > i � y ; � � � �, � � b o � �� � �N ro �, � �, °'
's: O" a> > y 7 � fl. � G � � � � � y .-, aJ O . O . � � c> 'd O" � � y O O P' U ❑ .^ a� � CL � �
?, .� H -o ro ° � .� o a � ¢� -°Jo .� ° � � E a 3 3 3 F� ° .� � .� F� �o �a � � .� ° � � � �v .� E� c�a
O
a� �. a� �o a� • � �- � � � � o
a'��+ O � � U "��'' U Cd � �,i',, .�V+ � � w
c�" 'O O pp N '� 'C � bA N O
� i. � A. O l� � O � � U
� 16 > o O � O 'O A. "� v' -� O 'C
> � � y 3 � � ° � 3 ° � � ° o
'+-� � ;; � a� �, 3 ° °° �, 3 a
co � � � c L y � a > � °�-' ;� � o
L ayi N � 'o a. a '� o a, a.
�
:3 � y ' � ° � .E � � � � .�, �
a Q c° ° L • w° � � �a v�i = �' �° � �
C.1 C � � N i�-� •� � N CC (C L � N
� o � '� '� � O CL �, y� G. 0. � � �
� O. cd 'vi �. E-� i r�i� E-� ."�-. •� •� F� s�. v�i
,� O � r�i� � � � � N
7 7 O y � � y
f0 � � � v c.`, � � � �
'.-r � � 3 �, .� 3 •�, -o
ti � •� o N � � � � �, �
0
> .II �.�, N a`ni � -� � j v, �
y � �
�+ N c� � cd b0
C � � O. 'C y v�i c�'d �, � N i'�"
� � �
� � N '� � O cLd 3 .�+ v�i �
+„� .� bD > cd 'O id
Q y �-' cd G' cd C � .,C � �
O p
� � � � " '� rn N cUC cUC
� �
U .�- G1. c�C .C� c�0 .L' G. F"' � . .
� w. �' b s' yp
O O � O
O O" � O a�+
� 3 a � 3 � �
d o y c.
� Ul a� N -d a� a� � �
� ? � �' � ? p, •
� � � � cvC �bp � �' .� �
� � � GL ❑ s�. �
d X y � � � «�. � 'O
� � � � t. �-�'+ � ''L'_' N
a �n N .� cVd �n a) .� 7
,� c�d C� 'O CL ;� � � bA
F� .� 'v� � .� F� ,L 'v� i
c��d C �' � p" Y b �' y N
.� t
,� `� `. � � L � �� U 3 0 �a �
� �a b �� � > � o -a � °A z -o �' � a��i .5
N y o o �. a � � 'c > � � �E �a a�i 3 �a
t`4 � � 3 ° � a a��i � -o � i � o �o .a >,
Q' �c � ? N •E � a' '�' °' °' � �, :y
� a, y �a
c � w, .x ? � � c
� L � � O vi � O � U � V ^ N � �
Cj `+ � L °' � .� ❑ °' °+ � � c ° °�' > � a,
Q — °.3 E -a " o E :.' ^n.°'. � o a n. . �
�' Q � N � � �- � o � �a ca � •y � � ia w°
1v � ca Aon .o � `~ -o � � '> °' ' � °= -o
� ;� � a [ c ; � ;r, ._. a� o a� � �? ,� �
£ H � .� ° � � Q ° F� �c E a � � � F� °
�
a� �- -o a� � �; c a ,Y -o N a� a�
fn � „ � ,y �' � � � � U 3 0 � � �
A e � '� > � o .o ' °,.,�° 'z ,v 3 .5 E c
L , ,N ,
N
� > cva ia d 3 0 � � � � a' � � � . •� •0 3 `� ?,
o� �. a a; � v �e �
> � (n O � � v, .� � A..� � °' °' " � °' � �' `a
w, L C :+ O `� �... � ? � ca .a � '� ❑
� d d � N c ° ' = ° `a � `° = � E «=
� Q O v a� � Y .� .� ° °' .� � � � o Q, � '> L a
_ � � � � � � `^ � �, ° � ro w°
Q � � � � � N `o _° � � •� a. . c `: b
;� � °' � c � � ;� ._ a� o a� � �? ,� �
c�j E-� -� .� ° � �� Q ° E- �a � a � � �a F- °
r
y � .=� � a .^° �
c�a _c 3 �� �- � 3 �� �
H � �� � � � o � �
�, �
�
0
:+ > >
� Q O �C C � � � � c�u
C y f�6 � �p �.�. � O y s��, � �
d Gf � � y «3 v, � y c�Na o
V � � 'O � y
N
Q � � � � � .� U � � i� i�
V � > P. � � > 0. p.
H � .� o � � ,� �
a� cd � � N � C P. �' '?y7 v, a� a� a N cd � � � ^ C C. .y ^O N a�
` � � � � N ,� ° U � -y � ro .� a� � � � o U � Y >
� � r�, a� � U 3 ° � ,� � y y � � °- F" � U 3 0 �
°�' � � N ao 3 � � a� °' E � o0 3 c
c� � a � bA � -o � z a� � � �. a. � � � y �� z � a� 3 �a
� m � � '❑ °,�' b = o � a a�i 3 �a � °' � � ��' � v,� . � "
G> � L C � � � � � .� � � � � v, a� •o
;� c � 'c � `� o °p � ai o ° -o `� � .v � o a�i E � '�
� N � O " a. � o �, a� _ � A. a� � '� co a� � p. o � � �'• ° a � �'
` � � N � w, N > � -- � ,a � � � �, � �, � � ,n � �
y O. �'a �n � �. c .d � u �? � o o � v� o � a � H
++ O � C .� c w °� c s�'. � o a� °� ai c'' � .� c w° °J � � � o cr � ai
a y w ca " o E � �' �s'' � o °� a, .'- � ,b, °° " o E � ' p ; � rs > �
� y *- �a o � �a � a '� ° E � `� � o �- ��a o �e � � � •° ° � � w
o•K � N �, o � � •� a . � �? -o „ � a� N a� E ^ � u' • � �
w � ^ N � ;L' ,� a� o y � � � p � "d � � � � �; � a�i ` a� � Y �
� �� Q -o � F� m E a, .fl � F-� u . � � �5 d -o � � � E o, � .n �a E-
� o •o � � o �o
++ N � y �
� � U
� � O
d E � � ° -c ' � 3
> a N
� . � � . �
�
`° m � � 'B 3 � � y
E > ;� '� � L •� ,a �
:: o � � � � :�
Q p � a, o y -o i ° `° °
c�.
Z c a� o. ; o a a� c�n �
� � ° a �c � � :: .n
.�
v v � � � � � y �
d � � a
.o Q �� � o �� �
E �
a — � � o `� � � o �
�
C> � o '� � o '� Y
++ G�.
O C � c� � � ca �
C.�,�. G. 'O �� �. GL ^O iC
O � a�
aa � o o � � .� o o �
F� 3 0. �. � E- 3 a. L
N
�
� O
N
+'' 7 �n h
N � � O O �
� O
� �
y C � � N
� o y � � ^�Z
a C E � mU
o W
� ��
d a) ^ a) ^O N a) a) a) C a) y a) a) C a) ^O �'" bA a) a) G a) v y ^V N
> aJ N Y � � Y O > .� � � cd c� O L cC
y� S� . G 7 y cd '}+ � v �+ .� �-. 7 C .D .� y p � � .� ^�
�p c.cdi " O O �C i a.v'.� � �C .L' G. a) C 7 O � C .-�. 'O G' id L' � ,� y�-
` a� �' �, 'v� 3 '� c " " .v " E o ? � .c ° 3 N � a � -o o � o m o
°: y � c a � �o s � 3 y •� a- •� � ° �, •� •� �� a o � ;3 � o- " 3 '� � ?, � �o
Q � > ° `� � o. 3 a� � N ?' 'E ` y � c� o � "' oa�n "' � .5 " � L °� `� ,�,�., N
�
o is :� � °' ° � � � � '�, c o �, � � � � -S a '� c c�i o
� ` tc c� ,_ � a a� c Y a Y � . .� a� � .°?, N c c ;3 'on Z
a> � � � c -o E � r? � a� o a� � � � � 'oo o � a� ,E � „ o o �
= N J o a� -d a; ? � o -o E ? a- `' � .Y � ° c,, �? E � � -o E > a o 2
Q " � � a �� �° °' °J o � � ° � � a� " ° a� � o Q `° ` �; o � � � o U
Q OA U U a .� L i- � � N i-�i 'O Y � .O N � �'"" cd a'L,+ � N CC L '� N y i �C O � �
iC C..) � O Y � � bA � � a.�+ � G � bCA V > y a� O N U � � � � � p' U
� �n L N .� O � L N O � � 'O s. C N N � F-� t-�. .� F-� 'O cd � p, E O
E 2 � n. s� �a F� � �, E- -a �a � � � � a �a '� �a o s� -o
> °v�' o c°�i y `o •� ro c°�i � > ' o c°�i t �
s' � �+. a� � a� °� a �
C � U � � � � � U O
� {E � � U L O C� � � L O � (C U L O U
y C id i� 4" � = a� c`� `e cd �= 'c�3
� d a bC_D � • Y �.`�, c�i • c b�A � ' �
c+'o :C `° ��„ 'on .� a`"'i � > � � � � '`� •� •E � �
� ayi �' � � o � .o .o � � '� .o `� � a� o � •o
:� Y
`: � � � E � � -o � `� o°n o � -o N .� o � -o °_'
a Q � � � N `o � '� o � = o°'o � o �
; �� on � '� o � ro � -o o ; �� -o
.o a��, ❑ � o. � � .� a a -o a��, c a � c�, ;
� O ,L 1� N U O � Q p .� O � �
� n. � � 3 a. F- � � � 3 a � c. � �e 3 a F-�
Q) � C N N L" -� N �O 1" N Ci N N L�i �O .5�. N N CC N N L" -�
> � .L cO Ui � ,� C > � C � r0 bA cC � ,.y ' C' ' > � � F .0 .�,�. C
3 cO cd �� � w � cd i0 � O cC
I� C � � .� ai � U � o ¢ o �a � � a�i � U abi v `� •� w � � U
..-� � W t� U �-+ L1 N �., U v� ++ A i' yy U Q�
d � �.,., N � cd � V �.., y � O
� �O � v, ° �d � W � > y v, � v � c � W y id �n cv �
a ayi °�° � p, � �° � � � °c�, > " � o. � c � °GA � � Q. �
v� cO c0 'v� Q� � y,. N 'O 4�• cC 'N G� . y �n cd c� �N �
yC„ � � .� � V � � O bf7 V '� � C V � � � .� N 'pq �
y � .� � U bA � �.. `'"' .� ❑ _ � � bA b0 y +-' � � O a�
++ r C O � 'O pp �n � � ' L � � A 'C bp 'D bA cd O '� � bD
Q N � a� c`�i o � c � � �, y o C O � � ❑ c `� a� � � c
� y G � w" c�C �G O �C � � `� � .-�+ ,� c�C � O �Q � �C a~i C � �'�' p � O �C
U "a :; > a s � a c� o a a`�i n. v � " � o o � � '� :? > � °� o o �
� a. � '� � 3 a. a L1 a .� -S .� F�-� � .� � 3 0. ri, L1 n, � ¢, � '� a. 3 c. o.
� cd t c� L t w � s c� � Y � � � `� L t
�
tn � � � � o � ,v o o � � � N o
L W
d G� �`�, � o � L. . � � Q i�. L . a�.+ � � �
y � � °' � � � � N °' �a � a�
ca � N ,� � .croi '� ° a. � .0 '� o � � � '� '� °
� x _C V �' O a� 'O L � G' O a� 'L3 '� V C � a� 'O
Q � Y � a) U O � v�i W � a) U O A v�i y � � U � � v�i
a�i C � 4. � 'O p N � b1J 4: � 'LS O aLi C i.�'.. �'" p 'O O
'O N � C t 7 0 y � � C � 7 � 'G N > C N 7 p
'1�'' Q .� � 1-Vi � iy S�"" � � � Sr � L" �' � b � Cd � 4'
� c. �a '� �c 3 a H � � '�, �a 3 rs � a �a '�, a. 3 a
a� a� �- � c� � c. bp N a� c c a� a� cu ^o � a� a� �- � � .. �
? � ° � � w° Q w � v°�, a�i � ' � � � � � °� ? � ° � � �° Q w
.� ; U o � � .� � � o � o .� � .� ? U o � �
N L
o {f� � " � `� U I-°'. � � �6 a g y t-°'+ t � � � a, Q = � c° C� �. � � �
U � • t, Y �
y � O �e as �a '.� � a"i U ° >, c � ^ c 'v c ro �a '.'..' � � U °
,lLC y c�0 � � a0 c�i �o W �" ,� a�i �v, � c�.� � � c�a � p�q � �o Oa a'
C" � ` �� � � `� �°° .� °' � > y � ° > � •� a� o, � � N ��p •� a' � >
� � � a°�i :� � .y o °' �� c °' .� c�d w c`�i �� U .c :c � ,� o °y' ��a
� �,d,, b v� a� v � c a� 'd ,� a �oA v � N a� ¢ c
V Q � � Y � •� U � � � ? �, `C° � " .� •°-�° —°o � � p� �v y � '� � � � � ;
�' Q � � '= on � -o o •� � o d '� � � -o o � �a � �� on �a 'd o '� �
� � �° " � ° o � � � °' °' N a� � o o °' c�i � v a a. o n, �
� � ;� � o .� � c° o � �
� � � °o. � � 3 c�. o. E- -o � n. F- � � � 3 a ¢y .� d � n. � � 3 a Ci. F-�
� a� v w a� a� u, s. pp �n s- c ❑ a� a� ao �o c� a� v w a� a� s., �
++ ? a�i � � � �° Q w° S � � w° y `� � � 5 � a� > � � .�. Y '° (� �°
v � > � a -o � � „ � on � � ¢� � > � � 'b �
� C �n �"' cd � N � � b � V N � O N � � � � i � � � � � b
C" � y f7 � � U '� 0.. .0 ..�-. ce 'c �' P. C � � �- >
� G� v " G� a. `� `� �^ ^ a"i U ° >, .c c � a .� G ° �a � � � � U o
� G, C � � c tq c�i �o CO ¢' c a�i v� •°�' ,,`�', c°�i c� c�d c on � o p� a'
> � cn o � '� � � `� 'cn .� a � � � � � a. > � � � p. � N �N 'on •� a � >
`+ � _ � +�' � -C � ,,�°', o `� " �� � � °" � � `�' �' ° U � -� � Y o �' � �
�
L +' c. L � v � .� � � �o � � E � �� 4 `° o�n o � ..o aj � N ,c c � ,b E
y a � � a� � � � a� °�° y a � �o �� '�, o � N � � a°� N c
= � .�° � c � a "� o '� � o d '� � � � .c o � �a � '� cu �a -o o •G �a
a � � � � o o � `� > ac°i .°r' °' � a� u o o °' � � r'' � °' o o � `�
nj � � a. u � 3 a a, F�-� �v � a E�-� � � � 3 n. � .= d � °o. � �a 3 `a. ci. F�-
�
�
� a� a� w a� a> >- � c a� a� w bA v a� w a� a�
� , N N L Y w � � L � O � > � � � •~
� 'p C > U p bA p � v�i � � > V O
(a M .. C Y c�C V � � c0 L O i ...�.. � � � � U '-�. �
H ti� ca � � w � '� � .� � °" � � �= �
m c� � � c° � a� a� ., c �'_
> m � � C c t�n ccdi • o sv�. c�i "' U ,c �� cD � .
� fn �+ 'V y � •�, •b0 .� � Q a� ❑ � y N �bU •� ac�i
� C d � � `� � y O v� .o .� ccdi U c'"'i 'o �' A y o �' •�
� � � � 'L 7 .��,, p y, cC 4. C s. C ,L N � O a) R.
Q O � � � ~ � 'S ,� s' -o °_' `° cn � � � Q y .� � -° -o
o °' � � `� c '� o �, '- `� o°'n �a o
V � '� � � -a o � � � �v o o ¢ � '� �v
-v � � � a � N s � � � � 'o ;; � � � o
� °.n. u � 3 a. E- � � � 3 a. �o � � n. u � 3 a
N N N `�-� N C L' G C N � N � W y Q �., �-,
N � 4. O L � (lOr � L a�-� L iN-i O L W � W
L � � � y � ,.� N 7 y � � '7 cd 'C r�
G� U N ->p C O � � W O � � 'O C O .� � �
N C d c y > `a � L y ia ,� � � ? `� � ` � -o
U . ��,, 'v1 �
a> > � � ^ � � � !�' a� � 'c � � � � c� .o U o
'� � � p � •� °..�' y •�° •� ,.� ° ¢ � " � � �'' � •°-�° " -a � � �
c N �' � � o � p. > � ro .°' `� `� a� o � -o �a ?
�3 0 �c o ` � � -� ° 3 '°�' � � � � a. � � �, 0 3 �' Qy �
� ca a. -o � .� c° � o P: `� ao � � -o � �' •� c �, c'' �
Q � r a� � � .o a o '� •�, o a� �a o ,o 0 o�n
y !� � � � � -o ° � � � -o o � �� o°'n � '� °' 'c �
x 'C N C � G. }. in � CL �p N C O, � C �
� W O � � � .� C � � � � � � � � C p � O N cd �
� � � a � � 3 � E— � Y �a 3 0. � a � � 3 � a F-
N N -f i N 4n N y �+i N N N CC �
�.a � � � � L W � '..�+ � t�, � � L p
N
� N � � C O � cC > O � � � .0 W
� C. Y 7 � � � � � � � � C � � b�A o cC O
� � ctf �n � U .� Q, .� � .� cC v� � v 3
G1 d '� U cd � � i• � cC � � � U aS O a� �
+' Q � � N U O � � C � U O � Y � N U U id
Q i c � w � -o �, � eo w � -o ; �� � w o � �
Z � �,' > c��n � o ,� � � c��n � o � °� > � " ° E
� a. c�Oa 'v� �t 3 E-� � � 'v� c`a 3 � Q. � 'v o. °_' a�
W V � � � V T � cd
V C' � y � O y c� C
C
y � '� � �p � .
O` Q. N Ci. N Q E � � p bA � �`'I
� � . L7" � L1 � U G" � Ll v�i �� •� p
O �
Gl � N O � N O U � O �
N C N O c�d O � y p� � cd O (0
QY 'O � .b � FV„ 'fl a v�i w C �
� O y '7 � .� O a� � a � C � I
�
aa m H � 3 s � ' � � o � � .� a �
w
L �U
� 3 .. �'�
� N � O
d � CL � N a
E � � U U �'g,
C y � �N
O tl� � � cva Q C
�� � � � ��
`V U ~ , U�
� . �.
V
n� m o
Zm � � D
N a�o � N 3 �
o n c °:
c�o 7� � c�D <
o ,�., � m
cn N
�
o —
V
� �t � G f� c� ...) �
� �. Q- � C � ry � � �
?� � (�c p. C 0 �
"� � `�3 -e '"''a
� � � O c�'o � � O
N 'LS < � N
N m � � p� fD
� � �a � �° — a
o� � � � a' � � .�
5 � '� � 'O O
� � � �,• °. 'Y n t�
�S � �� � � ° 't �
�
c? rn � m � y �° c-�o � w '� �
a. - ' o. o
� w � � � � � � � � i� o. Z
5' y• :.+i N �• �;, �' �• �-ti ��„ � -fD, ° D
� � � � �, o � �, � � �' � ..
�a, � c� �t�v � � � '�' < f�D
� � � � N � N
p � v� ."3�' p � v� p� O �
C � �ry � � C � � � �O L�
G. � vi � G. ;Y � -�i � �
C '� � C C � � � �D �
� � � 3
� � � w � � � � � � �
'a �' c �. `' H '� � Q- -� 'v 2s � � � �o � oo � �o �, � .� �o � a,
� co ,3, o � ;Y -� o c �' o � c''n o �' cio' � � ° � < m
o � � ,� w � � y � i�' � o c w � � n. m c o o � ,� co w co X 0
w cro a � ^. -`°, co a *i w CD � • cD
� � �, 5� � c�o �'. Y � � 5• � � � �. :-� o w �, � a�' Y .a � �
o ° � a- a- .� °' �, w � a � � � � � � � � w � ,�� a- � a� -°a �
7 • fD v, m co � �' a ,�' G7
� � �' � y � „c�� � ��i, �o ,�' :�� _ � � p'- c�u '� � „�� � � fD � N
� P� � � � �p �' � `"1 .� � O �' U�G � "c�'t � �' � �' � � 7. � � <
� W� 'J� `C `� (D� -�i A�' � ry � � �� `G j �
'� � '..'h � ('� � � :..'h 'W„ P� -� f� � N C �
� c w w � � � � c m w �' rn � p�i :'- �. � 'd 3 N
� O- c�'� Gp' C N iP � � � O � � �. cc O. O .7 � -� .P�J. � O.
N co -Q'i P� D �' Q. � c�o �-�s � P�s m R d �
'S 6 v�i � y CD '3 O d O �' O' v�i 7' O C�D O • O y (�D � 7
(D N O (9 � vi CIQ �-t �t N N O N (D �-t v� ry � �-s v� OQ
'LS � �' (� R y TS � r`S ('i �O
�• �. � � w � �• �. '� � (D A.
�
w � A� � � n
n � � � �' O c� � � tl�G '»
A-�' � � � �
� '� � �t � R N in � <D -� r►
C � � n <D fD
O � � � O w � � � Q � � 3 �
t��c N bq. � �' � � �. � fD C1 K,a �
� � � � m,� o_ � � � C�'! N
'd o � .� o � � � � p� N w �
p C Ai P� �, p C m W .y 7 L)
�o a. � °' c �cs a. � °- � e. Q
o � � � o � �
� -� � -� <D
a � O c � a c�o o i � V
`� n � � c �,Y � '� � 5� '� 'a n �o � o ��„ o � uo � � = c '.� o � � W
� � ° � � � 3 `��° `� � � < m °• � �' �' co a. � °c �o � � � co w � D
❑ p�
�' p, K -�i :7 � '.� ��-h � v�i �' � G. K �-wi .��. �N ''7' � R G' � n � i�-h '�-' � p � rt
°Q C7 5 � 5 �, o °' .s °Q �, d � � ° � c o � �'' ° w � � � 'o D 7
'v v, c� �o <D al
w � � o w c�o � � w a y � o � cu �' � � �' � n. w � a p� 3 � '+
� � v, '. co �' w � co 'C -r'+ -coe � O fn N <�
3• co �' tro � � p� 9 � v, � cv � tra � � N � 'v, co � � 7 'p ' <D
� C3�' G �� rn � ^ .z � (D . C N Sl G
� oo w • � o y aa m' m � � � `� � c� �D �
� � � c° m w ^o �' � � � o � w CD c��o � �' ^� �- �� 'C m � ? �
� cu .� a a n. � � � � � � .a c � � �,. o � "' � � O.v o!
n. � o � c�o � cn c�`o � �.' ��'i, o a. c�o c�o m ..�, °� •°,' w � .CJ.
ay c�o o- � w c <� � � o- o n `<' o c"c o o y � ��
�� a co o co � �� �G �� co n. �o .,, co cc ., v, .,, 5� -, v� oo fn
C
'yti7 (7 ,.� �' � n N `�, �' �• ro '6 ("� 'O � p c� 'cs � QQ � `t7 � v� .� `CY � C�. �
p w �• � '�' � � .fDy `n � R O p� �• � `S' � (D O. w G (D .�7r � R cD y N 0�1
� n. � �' � °� �' ��-n � �' � �- a .�» �' � a°co � `�,° � a � :.-ti w ;;, � o D
�� �, o w � 5' N � � �• o � o o �' Y .o �
°° � �� � �' � � � °° � C� o � 5 � � o � �. � 7 c�o � D n
w � � � w cso � � w a � � � � `° � � � w � °' y �' " ' 3 �
� ° � N �• � �' Y < � � � �• �' � �� `-4 0 � rn y °* �
�• �' � f* (D � � (D 7� rn � R N (D o' � � ;
y � ' � p p± ryq ?'- y. ct CD � � �G <p
w4 p c w w ^a a � � ..�, �^ o w w � c�'v �n � �� � �� 'U 7 C/� �
� � ,o a � �. a' m � � � co � � � a � a o � �� � °1 �
n. v, o co cc � v�^i � � ?: v�, 0 p- c"o c�o �.' �C,� a� �' � �
tp rn � � a� c < � i c o � <� o c�o 0 o w � ��
�� a cc o co � �� �G �� �o a rn .,, c� cc � v, .,, �� -, v� aa
�o c �' �3 �cs N -� � w v �cs m N a� � -�
o co c � o �• � �• a. o � o o � aa' a � �'
�o � :; �• � � � i� a � c � � � o �
° � � -`°n � � �' �-ti � � `; � a � �*i N � n
cv o • n � � p`' co o �' � �'
�' ., a� � w �0 3 ..
.° � CD o � �' N .° N °Q � 5 � m �
° � w � � o a ° �� w � � Q- °'
c�D�, � .II c '�" �Qto C A= � �0co c � C <
• p � o a p � � • ,�,t � p a• p � �p
o �, o � � � ❑ o 0 5' w o rn
� N � '. °; � � tro
�'
� n`. o o. c�o � c7c �'. c�c c�o c�o � c�o ?'_ w
� � o � ° w `° � � � 5' o C7 `� o � �• a o � °� o � �. C �y., � � a. ,° CJ
� co 'cs -e � � 6 rn v � a
.P'�, � � '�' C O�coQ �• � � � ro O. '� � �• � v~i ^ ^ „�.�t a � �' .��+, � � ro A. C
p a� •. �p� v, o rn `e p-�' co 5' .a �, tp�� cc p,• • � o v^� `� �' co u� D
�7� O- '� -�e R '� C (D �' �' R v' y � p R � � UQ• p�' N � �' �' ''7 v' � � i�
� d '+ � ,�.e U�Q O ?' ..I�� O O c�o j. �' � Cro � � � � � fD
w � �° � w N w '' "' � c�'o � o � � w -' � 'o v,' y '" v' ;�1 7
P' A. a c`�o P' � �. c'�c -wi co � � � 0. a' �*, � � y � o � � � � y K
� � 't3 v�i � w• W �' p c<o w' CO � [�c O C � � -� c�o (ND � ?� � � � � C' fD
� ryq „� 'O3 �y O Q' � � (D '23 � fD
c��o 4y ^°o e � °' c c��o � �o � � �. � c �• �, � a o � w' o � � � 7 v
c�o '�, B P: '� � � .�.� w � � � y
o w i � � � m p,' � � <� � o w` m �' �' <� o c�o o tio o � CD <.
n. v� a. a` co �u ❑ a. co a -� ., � co co ., v, .-�, cv ., ?r� n. � co
`� �, � ,� 'C �, �. c'� '.� -�-� '.d � � � �
�' C 5" O "'� '3 S
�• � � ,.�,� �• ''� ''� � cD O. � G � O
� �-�i '�7 ��-h � �w-1 � �ry � �-�t � L3. � CIQ .�-�
' w O • pj� fD ,n�, � � D
a • = D
� � � v, v t�v c�'o ° v� ,�
° � ° � �. c �. � o �- c � t�
'C W N � in �' � � � � (�/) 7
K � � ~ � � � �
� � � N � � :-• � � p�q � � <
� �
� P^� P�- -�i ;.� A�� rt fD
� c° � °c w w �' � w m ar ao
c� a a c o a � °' � ° o � a'
g co cv �' c co co
�, �, �,
�, R. c�v � o. c�o o c�v c�o � c�o °, c`�o
O
� w � � �• �• ky n. m, �y �c � � �. w ^cs � o a � w, a .� aa � �o � � ,-� �• a m y � N � �a �. m 'a G'
� � cn ^cs � �o < cc cc o `° � °° A' ° ° �,-�'n � cc < � t�`n o p' �' � �' � � ..�� tc �i o 3' o p� � ? ° �
cp �n � cc � co °O �-s co < co co � co '� co fl.
ry A� `+ A� N A� ry "Y y co co O. Y �' y �p � C �D �
� N rn � �, o � � � �' ?' �ti �, � co c n. ❑ o cc n. � aa '-' o � w �' o � � � w` a � �*i N � �° D
p � � o v� c�o 'v w l77 " v�, � � a,,� R �D � ^o °�'. v ;-e �° � o v, � ts �' �f '' � co �• ,� D
" . � C� a� C o. � `' <� .� � a� ?' � �
0 � � � � N � �p n "''+ � O � '.�s v� � -, co fD t�o �o �p � a.' cv �' � c�o � C'� � c�o � c�i � v'� O 7 �
fn m w ?, p, p� O O c a� a� co � � � �-� � p� p U? co '�' y CE N 7
j � 3' �' � � 7 � .'�.'�'' G. ^"t �p � � ??, � ??. � O � �^ ❑ � 'T ??. �7 � � N,
P
,��1 d� v, co � O. �7 O � cy O Vc4o v� � � y. �' �p -� n :+� � �' O- � C A. � � � v, � C f�D C
�p � p�, �ts ^C o: Cj 'r7 '° c�o o- �' v�, ?: � w c�o � � v, � '17 a; d 'v '� c° -� o a- m 3 � fD
p�p�j � � �' � .^'.�' G� `�p„ p �' �� `n �' w .a � �- p. � � p- w. co C�o � �' � 'G G' p � � P� c�o � �
A� C N rn � � "O �C C W (D
� � � "� � �] '�7 O C � � w � ti (D (D .�-� � "'� � `.� � O C 'a-r
�'� � �' a °� � a�o -�i n' a�o a a � c�o ?y � c'To v�'", � c�o :r ° vCD, °, c�'c � P' � � a�a � v��,' a`�o a c�o c�o w c?o � c�o
� w
N �
d C N C N C � O 'O i- . N N N v� 'O 'D N bA T 7J N C N r� 'fl � 'O N � 'O bA dD �t N
> ca S] c0 � .� O C � ^ N � � b-0 � � Y O > � N ^ C � a� C C ^
l+ .y' �' O � � ci tl s"' c� 7 v1 ' O «+ cd O �n cC ^fl v� ' �O
fp rC G' � P. �n a� •� � O � c:� o o 'C � 'd C U .� '� �. � U '� A. .� p (�Alj
� N >
� � .+�_+ .� �- • -^�a � aXi i c`n ° � a -o v 3 p�' � c�a a�i a �o o �. � o x t�7 co�
« fn .o °J � '�, = y o a �; a� c° -o ;; Q � p.., °4 3 '�n ro � >, E �, �'. � a � p, °' a
Q > d o o � � 'o � `� >' " � .°'o �° � o o a •�, 3 °= " cd � t° 3 � N
o �, > ;, 3 o`n p, °�' � 2 � a � � a� •� � � � ?; � �, �, °° �
la r+ �. a.+ `n �' O � G. rn � �' � `� � �n Q '� O. .'�^C 'n C bc�p � N � �' .� rn
a� a> Y cC O
A � c p � ° � a�i � � L a�i o ° :� ° � ° 'o � E�-� � c .� � a�i a� o � o Y � 3 � o � Z
:: � J U -o o � > o 0 on 3 � � � Q, � a� � � ^ '� c� > ci � a Y a. a" 2
� v o, a ' a � � � � "° U o . � sa. ' o o U
Q c N o o �e a� �n � � ,. � �on a� � � '� 4- o 0 0 � .� � � � -� `_' 'a � � ° �
a `�" '�a � a � E b s�. � � a� c �, o � n, � �; � � N � ;� c -a c � � c � a� a� a�
° E � a� °' > y � o > � � � °' o 'o a� a� -d � a� � °� � a°'i � �o c � � =� E �� a°i
� � .� � •� � O N �O W � O L N C N i-� O -C C (G `L" N O Fn Ir Ir O � L
E-� -o � � n. � v � a o on o � a c � F- �e � E-� -o �a u on '� a � on � ,� '� a C7
> o °�' `� L ° i c � > `� a�i ° `d o c
� � � " � � � '" - �a w � '�n a�
c a. > � �a � ,� � � � a'� `d Y � �
� � i ° � � � G y �o � i o `' �� °c�. � °
:. " n. -o � v� a� ' '" 'v, ' a�
j � � N � � Q �., �� � a�i � � � a� .°�, N Y a�i
,� o y y
co y � Q' � � •� � � a� o � n. � a � � a, � °'° � a
C � '_ ' �. a� -o op •� �° .o
+: � � ° � a� a a°� °A � °�' � � a � °�' � o �
y ; � � -v °' °� � 3 o y � � 3 0 � 0 3 0
a Q � `� � 'on ,.o � .° N � Y o � � � o .° ,� � o
,n a�i � � � o, °�' o �o 0 0. � -o a�i ,� c °� °�' � � o.
� o ,� ° o � ,� ¢' `� w a� c L � ce a� ,L � � a�
'a a � ao 3 a. E- � ° a`""i � � cn 3 a. y F- on .� s
� a� a� v, � > a °' � a�i
o � � y � `� � o
� � U 'p ty
f6 � N > W C
n c E °' � "' s � a � °
d Y a� -o Y � a ° o.
j �p i� o o c � ia � � 3
0. � � � v
A d X � iC N ,Y vi ,Y
y N v� � v�
� � .0 O �.�. O bA � "C N 3 � o
a.�+ N � � N � �' C1
Q N Y � v U � � � p v' L .
� � � � � O � G U � ^,�, U
�j -�o a�i �' o � a -o a� � id 'o
� n. o o°'n 3 i. � on ° � '� a
� a� -o °' � b �
> N ° — � a� > � �, _ .
� a N ° o ro � =° a"i
x � � a o a� .� •o
�O G1 y � � c, � O � s.,
> N � � o p, � c� � A O.
� iC p 3 id v� �
�+ p � N � � � N
� � v� `� � Y .'L'.� rn � U 7 O
� k ;� � an � o :S �' �a, 3 0
,;; �C ° w � p, �-
Q � s„� ' N r�ii � � V s.. .0 � y �
L
� y O > 'L1 ��' 'p � y Y � +S-'
.�7 0. 0. c�C c�C 'r� L�. � bA 3 G. �
Y L N f/1 N N V � N
�� N N N � •� .+r-^+ � �
C
O � � p � N C i.�, � Ll. �
� � a ,� +-��
N 0 � 'b cd � s.
•� � � � � � � �
� � N P. y0 `n U N � .
� U
CL v� iG --�-� � � `� prop ..V.. v� N
C d � '� � � � '� N � O
U �' o " °' `� � � °"
., � � .r
Q — cd L V � O �
� Q F, 7 bA -p O N C b O
� � � � O � p = � � � p
� � a � c°'n 3 0. � cn 3 3 a
� a� s.. � v� a� a� Y ^C o
N > o � � t � ^ a�
++ ': c> a� a� � �.
t� 'a c o, ^o a�i E � °�.' �
fl. � � � ? a c° � :: ° E
� GI C1 ^ � � � 'd `" U
> (a 10 � v�i cd ❑ N y a�
G� :� fl. c � o o N • `� � � 'o
� O. V �n cC s.
� !0 fn O L � �, � � y rn cd c� -p O.
� � � � +�+ L' a� O � .� bA � � 'D
= r Q d � � N � a v�i 0. � v�i
L Q � � y � L � � � y o �a 3 0�
=� � i c y o �° o i c ^ o
�
a � o o �° a°�i 'Y c�d' a�
�.j '� °o. � 0 3 �. � ao �3 iy s
r
� N +� N Y N N N 'C O
� � � � V .y' 7 V QJ
� � � � � � � �
fQ ., C s.�• p � � O � o � _
� C� N !6 Y � .... c� � •
� _fp Q' ^O '�n
� l6 � — +' � v�i c�d � � C a� y N
O c0
�, • fy o 'E ' `� � � 'o
R fA Ip � � v, X v' 'v, .� n c�C V -p O.
d G1 V � � '� p a � � .0 c�j Q p '�
� � � � � L 'O 7 cC '3 O
Q � � Q iC i V N O �
U '." +7-' bA .b O a�i C v� O
� � y�, � p O � F � cd N
� n. � on 3 a. � on 3 a �
? o � � t > N a'ai ° � � `o °' � o �
� t�0 � °' j w � � c� c_`e � w °�' � °' o
� a � o -a � a � � � � " � ro o
N � °' � `° `a °' °� 'E .a'-, `�d 3 ,v � " `
N = L C cd �" 'O .-+ � .b v, � G.� � = O � a'
a+ � � C a� 0. � p � �
'y��a � � .� O p � N ' � � p cr�d V � N 't7 �
(Q d Q7 0 C1. ^ � V v� cd c� �
` � (, N `" y '� �' p�p •V b a�i C aNi id � bA O
� O �c � ° � � `' L � a ° o � � '� .� 3 °
a 3 a
Q a� r � Y �a ? � r' �° a i° ° du ? � o � .
d y i c � o '° o � � � °, c � ' '� � •° � �
� x '6 «�' � o � o c a�'i � � a� �' ° � � '� � ~ 'o
W � a. � o°'n 3 `a. � c`n 3 c. � aki N � a. F�-� a�i '� o.
a� a� o N a� � -o � v a�
> o — � > c a� �
c � ° � 3 �
� m c o" � �n .° c v
G� � � °� y v a Y v, `' b
o cd
�+ O cd O ty7, O 3 cC � O
� y � �n � vi y � 3
G> G� '� O � N � '� � � �
= � y
�' � c«, +' p �
Q N G "" i` a� G y � � U in C
Z � � O > '9 � � � C 0. � .�
.�- G�. G�. � � N .�- bD � cC� G. a�
Va+ y � � �`�'„ C
QI � p � � U
• �. %
O O. il • � ro fn 4:
a � �c a�i o ' 'a �
a� � � o � y bp p
R O ¢
0. C in N
y :.+ o. � O � �.
� O � y U � C
Q. � A. Y y '� W1 rn •y ,�,�,,'
++ p
a a° .� � $, � � w � � �
H .� � � w, � W .a w
y � �V
� •0 � � `�°u�
�
C c� —, y C7 � O o
N �
� � otS OO 7 � o m p
O v, o�
C y � C7 ,C � ,v �,N
O v1 p � � � � p�
> � p, G1 L W o(7
C � � (; � ..�T O
, U�
V
�� x m o
2� � N c D
�o —
� � n � y � �
ry o �" y C 7 o�i
c�o �j j � �D �
� O' � m
�. `� = G�
O �
N
N
i�' o � w �' e � � o � .d �' � � � � 'O
•-�� C O. � �
p�q � �' � � n. rn = o� O � O
� °- � w �• � � � cv r' � � 0. o y 3 O
� B � aa c g � m �cs � = �
ao
� �� � �� � c�o �' c c^`v < �' �n 'cs c`no � d a
� •O N „� �p � O O. � � �
< � O. � ,a�,t y a ro � � .� �' � � `a s1 �O O.
� � co w � � �'i � • o N � �D
a� o w C a�, ,n-'
�' a. v�o c�o � c�o v�, o. �G � �' o. � �e � ''�'�
� ^ oo co � o �• w �-n o N -o � Z
o �� o C w '"' < � ° ? �` � �� ° � O
c ❑ ,�. � o a � � � � io n. D
a° � •, co �q �' � ,7+ � :; 0 �
� p� n. � � �. � � �, to r, �• fD f�D
� ,7� to c�o N � 6 � � .�-. in' � N
co ❑
o � w � �, � � o � � C S � py O rt
p. ,.�. � N � '� vp'i " ct O cD � f�D
� . ti° n' o �+ � n' � � � 'a s � � �D
�
Q' �p 7
�
R r P� � O � 0 � O' (�D � W �-s r�
r�i� f]. OQ N v�i f�D v�i G. `G ''�-r ("� CS. � (�D
� � �
� w < N < A. � < � �' � �0�. R1
O
C �' O p„ C � O `�-'"� ��-. '�'� x'�
N
`N° °° � c° � � c � b � � y = � D
F m � `�' `-' `� � � ��p � �
°c a � w � �- .��, �• N � N �3 �
m m
� � � '`• � °' � 3 � =
�• � a. . m .t <'
� � � �
< v° v, co o � ° ' v��, a� �p C� C cD
O d�0 UO �� � ¢ cD � � � � N
O
f�D A. C O � ` C p � � N �
' 'O � R 'r � �
� (/Q ¢' N r�y v�i ,-�-' '�' (�D O � (<D
�' �' VO d� � '� c�`o p .� c^v � O = � �
cu co � � c w � � � �w„ < � (o o. n
o � 5' o., o �'. � ¢' a o �- c*i � � � � O D
.� vo o w o• w � c� � �,• � 3 c� � r.
i� v� � � � n fD N
o cc w �
� �
C. rwii � � � � N � � � � � �' Q � � 3 �
'� » '�. ^-n �� 0. Q' ?' v, fD C'1 .�_+, � �
O � �� � �� p .-y n� � � �• 7 N <
�� v, `� w g � � � ¢, �, a'_ N � c� <D
r' � p � �i �� � v�, � o o co 7 � W C�1
C a' Q- •�.i � � � •y ,� � Q a
�' a Y -��s o 0.. � � � � w �D
o c�o co o�o � � c�c � co a' cso � � iv V
.�a
'o vw, n c� � �y' �• � � � �. n o � N
�• O w C N < O. � < cu 0'_�0� �7
C' � O CD O- D
(� N � .�' O p. < '.Y O :_'h � ��-t � �
� � �• � � � � � � � � � � ' O D '
p� �e � p � �' � p C fn� <D N �
ti O D G. � O1
c p, w �- � ,o�� �• w �^�,' p� ��*. 7 � �
o Q, �- � � �c N y o VJ 0� <
N � 7 � = �D
� � =. .
�' � r' p' m -, � ¢' 0?0� <
� �° cc v° �n io o c o ' �' w � - c� cD �
^+ � � cro a� � � o io � � � 'C
� � 'z � r ¢ � o y ��'-• j 7 al
O � G. C � � • 'O C �p ,.�• � A
� �
O.. CD fiQ Qi' N ��-ry r�n '�-r 'J' (�D O � N �
_
'Ly � � (� (D ,7 �' P� � lD �. � "C [ �
� � < N < G. w C � � � � �
p p vi � (D C1.
� N r�-. g• o a. < � o ri � =R � �
� �, N: � � � �. � � � � � �. _
� D n
� o �' � `� � � � � � �
c °- n. m � a ,��, �' N � � 3 �
o .a
a c � � m m d
� cr �' `' �. o o. r: � m
co co ip �� °' `' � < �
r� °° v� � o o' � � �' w � � N
o � �^ � � `�n p' � � � � � � N 7
O pi O. G � � '�• .� � ,.n. � w
rn p p � C ,.S
O. (�D CfQ � N .�+� t�ii ,��. .`T' N O � CD
o � oo v,o � B c~v p .� c�`o :s � '° �
a� o � w � � �, �; CD � °5° co a.
� � � � o � � �' �' � � n �i � `.e°
`o �, vo ?- � w' cu o. �, � r. � �. � D
o �' a� � � �' � � "� o � �
o � � � � o � w � o ,� �' � �
�*, � � ,�, v, 3
�, �, �• � �. �• a
a �
.� o �o' a° 5 'Y 0 -�, � �rs '�3' A= C <
., v� �, ° � c w N c o co � fD
�. �' � �O, 0' �' �� n �° � � '� ,� � 01
n � O � � 0 � O. � � f� N �p �.
' � C .. p �' C p'�'" � O' RQ G "w+ �' <.
-� O. co OQ cc v, c� co �' .-� 0. '� co
fIQ 00 (D "� n C `� rn �n "�
c�o c�o m o � w � °� '° w � ° vo� � o
a. � � N � �c a (7
,v � tra °- � w' � o w � � � �. � c y
� y y
O co pi r' '� �n` R 6' � � . � ,r
C. r�n � � ti O � � � � TJ '�" � '
C .+, C
p. a, I3' in � 7
o � �• b�a �• C �• N y �
o �
�� � � o �- � � a v, w Q: �p
� � o � N �� � � o � � 3 V
C n' �, „�,� tr4 n co •..��' ^ � � �w
�i P- � -��s � Ll. p�i = 'O ry � N
N O' W
O C6D N QQ (�D vCi N � N ? c�D � � (CD
'� T � � � '� � � N "��' � �' � � � � �N„ � Ci
o, cv ?» �' � o. < �i < a N < cv �' �
� � ,..i O �' � � O � O.
�' A� "�' O- i-�+, � v, 7� O 0. < � O '� �-s
:-• � � � � , �. N. aa � � � � � � ,� w w y D
� �
3 w � ° � � °' '-� ^ � �' �: � �
`�' .p � ^ G � w �' � � c, w v, N 7
a.
�. � � ° c'' N � � " `�° � a ,.�_.�
cc �' c — �• w' „ � n. cD �
� �, � � co cc Uq ri � O o' O�-s 'N3' w '= �
O G y � p � G� � .^s � � Co � � � (`YD N �
� �O O- G, � �p v' � � O � � G
`C . .� � „�.� � N�
�
o a c�o = � o. cc a�c a' c`�c °, � `» �' rn o � c�o
� ac cn " c� c � co � -o � n. � n. w �o � � � m a y w • oo .� �v c
3 � '� � a � co � o o C o �o �, E, C7 ., �' c c� ,�- � � 5' � -, � o F � o � �,
�Q � � cw�o m o. � `�'" c � co n. � � 'a c � ;�- =4 < < `D '° � � � � �D �' � �D c`+o w rn :; �' c tfDo io ^' ��D"
�D � o �. N � � o � ri ° `; '� m. o q• o � � o' � �; n. o o co � w .�. � `° " p- � � D
p Q- � w �D o• w a �o � p,• — � w � � ?:, ,� c o � � ?», � � � � � o o �c � p,• � .� D
��, � � �' N � � � °; a. � � � � ,.�w, ,��-. '� c��o � o � o °- � � o c�c G � � r � m
o'� co m `C � � co o ro � o co ` 6. •p � v �, �n � p 3 �
(n ti � r�.� ''� ,.`�„ C ',7' tn v�i �' N � � A� O� `�' c9 ,.�. O � � W � � C1 !Y 7
? m ❑• a' a' � w F �. � = o n c�u � = CD � o � � � � � ^� d = m
�7 aa �' � �+, �' w ' cc o �� °- w' � `� � p- °o ° w °' � N °' o L*. � =
� �, o o -� �, w �' � -s _h �, �. -e . vo � c .v O N �'
�o w ° N < m � a o � 5' 3 °= y °, = w � � `< ?.' � c*' m a, cc o ° � � 3 N cD
° v a a w � � � �' ° � '' ?» n: ° �' � w ° a • -o :; `' �,
�'� � a, °Q fD o � � :� o � � �' m a. �- � CD < o �� � �� �• w ^�* <. � �
�.oN = 5' �' °c �- � � a°o � � '' <' `�° � a � �' o' � N � <' °c < o' �- �,• io' � w c o' �: � �� � � °: �o'
n ,. io� oo cc r., co co :s' co � �o cx v� n. a a co o co co � cc �n o co � v, -, v cc �n
.-..W :
N �
N aJ N N 6J N � N r/� N O N C 'O 'O �n N N .�' 'O O C 'O �.• �N
> �a ; � � 'n 'y >' 'fl Y '`� � ° � o > 3 � .y o .� � a ro � > � a� .� • � `° � � o °: �o
`° m ° ° Y r+ '° �c c � � � .c -v �e � �c � ° " � � � Y � � a� � ° Y ,� °. � m.,
� � .. 3 a o = � o 'o L .o o N E �, ,� o -0 3 � � c=n � a � -o .a 3 0 .� �E '° � m o
:: y f� � � a� a. on ° a'�i �" o °' �� � >, �s '3 s _ o �� �a 8 c .. o c .� L �� °' U a. cn .� :'° •o a o
Q y ; � a J .Y N �, 3 � � 3 L �, y � .� � � Y � o � s �o � W � ` o � N � '� � fy N
^ @ +_� v .� � -� `y"° °�' � � °p � c •�' .° � ° `°° � •� � °E' `,�.'r., '3 � � Fv.. � � v ;y � Y o
� � � t
-o a �. a� c� o � � � �a a� Z
d � J � � ` � ,E o :N a� v > � > a. � c�i �, � > E � � � � � E � � � on � � � .c � `� _
:3 0o c a��, 'n .-. .E � c,, � � � o � o ' a � � ❑ �, � � � �a °A g �o o -o U
Q Q c ° `'"' 'b � � � � o � 4, � o � o � � �- w, w 5 0 � .°� c .v °� v�
> L � -a �, ,� c � -v � a� ❑ o 'y w a� c � � �❑ � � ' � �
cd ro Y a� � � p O v� U y N � Y � pp G' y � y y "«�+' > O' � � C �G "' bq rxi, � ' � � L�' � � � �
on � '� F�-� � .� � `o. � .5 �a F�-� �o � ° '� .� '� i. Ca � 3 -v :: �o ° �° � °s�. '� '�. ° a � a, � F- ° .� 3 °�'
v, w v, �
> � N ^ O � � � � � � �
� `'' t o s-`n. U � O a�i -O '� O.
Op � � � � 'fl 7 O � cyC A. cd p O
O N � rn 3 _. �.
y � cC L' U O � U '� L 3 �
� � � � ,N U N U y
w -� � G. � 'O
fa
v� cC � � C ' y �- N '+�-� b ¢,
V d L ,� W L' � Q � O � � c�C
� � +.-+ U � � � ¢ .
a a iC v �" � �C C G � w .n Cd � .
� � 4. O N cd � p� L � � �n �
C b0 O � � a � O ,� `V id N O
.`� O. �v� '+ c�C � ,C � G. `r^ L CL 'y' II.
? �' y � O � .0 � O
l6 ro •� a� c�a y � '� c`'a
1� C � � '� � � .a .o p � .
a1 � �y ° � '- � ;? � 3 'v, a`�i
Y rn E U � o U ., �o
c � � �e t F- _" � ° ''
L L ,� � 0 � (d �
� +�'' c�C O � v� � N O
Q f// � U c� � � C � p
� � C �^ N 'V � � CL
U 'a °� ❑ � .= a`� •
C p bA v� p fn � a� a�
.� L1 �v�i 'C v� 'a � 0. � �
� ,L 'O O � .0 'O �
� � Y , .
[C +�-' N U N C O ^ N
� d � G' � � .0 � 'O 3 •� O
� y .r o � .� � � � U o a
�+ � `° E W E ` o � N �
l4 '� 7 U y�, � v�i
N � � F-' O W Q N O
� �( „Y � � O � A.
+��+ � � v � � bA = N Q
Q y G 4. w � N ;� �� y �
'O � C x ,� s- p Y .
C p bD v, .p r�i� •7 �a � o
.�- Ci. �n 'C v, 7 � f�r �
� w
> � � O � �
'� � '� O
� � � �
C � bA Y � O �
�
� � � '-�' O cC 3
N 'fl 7
C) � cC ^ r, "' p bA
�i � y� C cUd C C�
Q. � C1 `� �' � � �
� � v � � � '� � � �
O a`> G� '� '� W Y � on
U +' � y c U °' � c
Q — � � �' � ' �c
� Q `� C C �
� a� C � � O .d � �
'O � .O � a O
� :7 0. '� w � � .� �
7
N > � � .�= o � �
+r '" ? 'C ° �, � -o
R � � ao � � o �
C N o
Q' � ai � �' o a�i '$ � � 3
� � QS (4 � cC L' V O = U
� l6 N � � c�d G. y 'p N
� vi cC � � � � �
� d d � y � � � � � �
L �'' �- �� c v °� � .5
y Q p a�i `° � �- � �c c "°
Q � -`'o�' a��i c E `o .D a -o
c ou o -o •�, o
C�j � a '�n .: � � .° c�a
T
' � � ."G.+ 'O O � C N O
ti � � y , �
� � � �
� �C L � ,L (]� -(�. .0 � •--�
y � as . -p p '� �
�C M ., C � � v�, a�
H ai ia �� � ° � ' � °_' � 3 '�, „
> cUC = �+ � W � � U � 'o
C NO �C C U � � ° c�.
� � � v, cC ,� F" O � cNa �
L = L � y '� � � �
d � V � Y � � �
N � �
� Q' � E � � U w � � C E o
Q O � o a c w � :n �� N �,
U 'o .°', _ ,�e ^= i •
� °o. '� '� ° 7 � a.
� �
C > � � .= o a�i p
V � '�.,C ;; i" ° v, �0 -o
� a � cn � � o 0
N � � p) °� o acdi '� � v� 3
� � � o �
> +' y = c U
'a � � � � n. � �a a�i
� � � N `� � � '� � ° Q
� Q, ��p .� .c r,�' � � cn
r.+ O � C Y � U � � C
Q d ;� m � � F" E ' c -o
� y �,., �,,, C � a�
a) C �',',' o � � ^6
� W C � b�0 O = � a' O
.�- O. �v�i c: cd � .� c�C
y � i t., W rn pA N
> � cC W O O bA � �
C y E U � 'c
� G� c � F" � +�- '� ° .a
> Q. � o � � � � a °� o
� �
� O ,� 3
�o —y N � X ° o �
� > '
a> d L c�c •y��, "O y •� U
'�' � � v � C C 'p �
Q O a� � �`_' 'a c�a L -�o °� cd :a
b �
❑ �
Z � °o. '� .� .� E � ° ¢� �
+r ,,, � °�' E � W o 0 on �
a�i � 'o °o. �? E U -o �, � 'a
'o o. a. �, oo ,t F" � N � �
L L" �O ^-N+ � � �"' �
a � -d ro o
0
-� � o � w o o � N
d �. a y' c � � ' �,
C C � O, � 'L �
v • m
a�; o. .b w .c � � � � U �
p p y c� s -o � � I
a a .� o w � °' �, '�, � � �
� � � '� ,� .� E °: ° w
��
m
� cv o`o
N a
� � Q �o
x �
C y @ m
� y `� om
n. �
� � �o
� U�
�:, t �
(/)� V
�� r x m o
2� r � � �c � D
Z�l 'ti7 � p. �p, a � •'
O � n. � p y 0 �
N N � � y x � H 7 y
� � � � � 9� � 7 y
v C. � Q GI
O �
N �
r�i, 7 0 -�e ^� � � t�o f�D � �
cy �' co C � O
N 3 " � a 'C rt0
� � a h°-h ^' ° p j O
t� � '. U!
tm' � � w c`�'o � �.
a � � �� � � c�o � A' -�
� � n. � 'O O
� �' w � o n <p'
� o o c�o c�o � � �
co �, zs .� w ts � ny [ � c �c a. � c .-� ^ a �a �c [
� ?» � c�c � � � o � o co a. N. � CD '? p' o � � Z
�' '� `°• � � �' �y �C � tr�a `-° ° � �� �, � � c,�t C D
ao ,�' � � � �a � co �' �• � P: °= N ?» w m' � r.
�, a. � ,� � �o co o �. < cD
�' y � `� co' � c�o io o � � �' � � v�' �p 7
w. vi �7� ry � r. �' � D .�-. R o �
� � � C' � Gi
� d � � �• � � y ? 6' Q- p� P� �. � O � (D � N
�-s � C C N -K �
� R w � co v, �-. w � n. �' � p, io x � <p �
� � � o O v, 'c3 �
� �G � A� A� A� � C C O �
.w-. v�i �-�s (�D a' 0. cn� O. O.. �. O. (�D (ND (�D Q. � O N (�D
..�o cw''o � a c�o � o � � o o �� 6 � � � �y', �• �° � o " o 0
c . w � a' c � " � p'_ � � � �, � c.; � c � co cL K 0
_,' S • � � � a � 3 c� � �� � �� �' c� � a. � ° =° • m
� c � �' °= � � w �• .��, � r" c � � = ^. bo � o � ='• �
� q •, o' .� o -� � a � � o n. � io � co � ,� 3 3 D
,,. � �v ;� � CD �d a � �, � �. � � m
c �' N � � o � CD � � � � �' �' o � ° k �, a � �
� � � .: � �• c �' [ u• � � � <' w co �o p�<p � y
`n cv,o ,a ,�, �j p. O�o �• o. � ic r, io n. �. � c�'o � ° � � 3• � � <
'"'� � p � a C �.] p� � '�'' � � = � � (CD C v' � 'L3 � � al C fD
v, v, �p' � 'S �7 C�7 ,� p' � G� C O G. '� � co 7 N
� �' " � a N ¢ '� � p � '� � � �' A� � � � y �
-� (D �
�. � � T �' � � rn � ?. � � c � � � � < w � o <• 3
`G �v co ao �o �o v, co. v, co a v� co �v v� co ., ro
^o c� co w �--� � w w � �7 � o o ^ti c� y w � N 'o �
�i � � � �' c�c � � � o � � ° -� � � �' u o � ° o
p '� 6 �• �' '�' a. � � � � �cs �- � �' o n. � ,-���. c�o
'LI
¢. w C (D C n
� '" c7c � `-; o � � �� `° � � � o a, � � �' � `�° w � 3 � O D
�. a n. �. a o � ° CD �' T c o ° � vi � � m �
�' � w m � � �. � N �. <' m c � k v, C; � � 3 �
p' m o o c�c � v�, n. G N —• _ � '3' co o- c� � G�
ID f'f �� C1
� � 9 � °• c�'o N � ° � � cc a � �D a �' ° 3 ti O � �
� � C °- c � °' °� � ;; b t' c � � � � �' � ,a w y- � c�i c�o
�
"• � �' co'o o �• � � o � � � w c�o o c�o ° `° � _� w C�i
.�y � °' w � w �rs � p. Q
w
co o' o m c ~ a�c w �' � C �* c � `" c � R o <� cD
n. o .i '� cv o co ❑ �n' t�n �'. a v, A'. co v, co ., tt .l
�
'.O c'� N C� y ,� e� P> m. x C1y c'� ',� G b � .� � � �' b � N
p� � .�-. � �v � � � O �y � � � � S (o O = � � ..
? Hj � c�' r�n' 'rJ � � � �G � •d � � � � � � t� � �- D
� � ,r ,.d' p> p n, p� C ry �. �p �� Py O C1. � �-s � 'y.
�' w �y o c�o c�o <' =o � � c�o �° � � :; � c�o rn p^'. t� Q y �
� � n. a � N 2s � co G� � o a �* � w �, `� � a � �
o � � co -, o co �• w o� � C f/) cp cD p1
o O
a' m p o c<o � cv�c o, � c w �• � v, � �' � � � 'o `�' � O fA � <
� o � � o � a o � �- n. � �, fD � �' o � � � c��o � d d < �
p N c �• � . v� � ;; ., .� C" c � _ � c v� � .� m - C� cD �
rn 5 n`. � m o ,7 � a a�o� C� n' �, $ �0 3 � �P
�� � � � � � �- v �' A- �, o c' � � c � �o � Q' n
io o� o w o� � tio w` �' y, C c � � c c�'o � � <. �
o. � � � co o co � �., �v ?'_ n. �., °'. co �. co ° co f0
� o c� � H �- o m w. x � o � o 'v o '-� � � » '� C �
p �' cc � � � o � -� w � �; co o � � � �
� � c �. �. �o a. a � � c�s .o � ° �, � o a � � °' �
^ �'�, m � �o° � � °' � � w� cr „� a? io � � o. � m' D `�
� � ro cn � ° ,o co c�o �` G� � c° o o. � � w �D " D n
G � a p- �, n. o � p°, � � � � � � a ° � m � O
a. a� �p o c~Co. � v��i p. °' `n �. �' v�", � ..�^': i�v � c=i ° k v', � � �
� O v� ryq � � _. �• � � � lD a p � � �
w o � 0. 0 � a o a � o- �, c� :s o w w o = < �
� N c �� G . � � co -� �o �" c � � CD c � �o °'- � �i
0
�' � � a °' � � '= ° a � °' � G� ¢' :T ,._,, o =4 � � O
� ?: � � � .F�y�' ,o c�'o' � �o �' � ° CD w � ?» �
�. c c;
co o� o w c ~ aa w ? �' � �,• G °c w a- o � o <.
a R -e � co o co ❑ v'� co a �n co v, �o -e rn
� .-3 �o �o N �rs w x �v � � � �n c a y -o � n. �o ts [
o N � o o � r. o o �, � o o � � o �- o � o o �
� � � ^. co �. �n �• � o �o n.
� � ° � � w c co' t�f �° a- � c�'o G� � � ?', ,..y v � :; y
cc co � �, w co � co a�' � � � � w � �,� � ..
co °' a w B � ^ � ° � � � � =° o c o �' K �
� �^ �. w� � � fD 5 �o w w. °� � � '' v, � 3
'.. m o cv a, � � � :T �, a �
" < � � � � � n, C] �. � �' � �U � <. `° � G ° m C �
m � ,� c � tra ^ � �.' � a' .+, a � � o � � � � <D
�
p. � o G. � �' r" � O o o O ¢ � 'C ,.w. �
P� co r. P� P� '» �
O 0. c�o � C1. w. v,' O. 0. � O. c�v O. �' P. G. c�9 O CND (�D
co o- y v � c� m a'_ x G� � "' = G� '-� � C
� CD �; o �' � 3 � o o -• � co� `��° co � a- o o � o 0
� � �, �• � � � � � � � �• � � o c � � � (7
�; c�' � � �` °� � ^'' rn � �-- ,.��., `� � �, ° p'_ c`�o a � a�' ~ „�y„ D
n. �
co •$' :; o co � �` p, P-3' p�' o• � :; n- c�o -��, �p r.
n. w o o c � .�y o. � � b �� -� 'a co o �s '' �
� co ?; ¢, w o o `� co p.' o �n N � �.
o °" <� � c � � o � ° <� co' g X � c3i
� � co � p� � � � v, n. �-e �n c� � o =
c a. o .� �s °' ry � .��' � ° ,�o_, � � Q o �' � � m
� �' � �
� <' c ^ o � �—' � .o a. � c '�s CD � •�
`� o. c' o � N ^o � w� � °. a' � � o w �
o � rn c�'o R ai �: � � • � v�i �' o �' -�e � <.
� � n. O. co R v, �o a co co co cv co [v
'b o � � '� �. o w a'_ x � o � o `U o ,-� � � 0 2s �
p � ? � �, '� c CD fD F � ,o �- � =' �' �°o c �, � �.
a� � � o. w C co ._ � v�' a� � a � �,
'�' �' �*' �v •� c�c � � � � � ,v � � � o. " p= D D
o �. a a. 3 ° 'a � � G� � o. a � ts c�o � �*
a � � <' � � �J P' � Q �• � N �• <' °• � N co v��,' v�i 7
� P� p O CD � N ¢, � w • � � .�`S' (D � ,�� p k �1
�, � � o. ° � a ° � � a � � � c��o � o ?; m � w 3 t�o
� N � � c . �, � � �, �v � c � c � �. ,�
�' � � n. °- � � °= ° c. � °' v�c � n. o �, o c� � �
n ,�• �� � � � �' p� � � � � � � �
�C' � '�-' � �-�i .��. 'Cf �. �� �' R � O• � � G� �p �
p P� C RQ A� �n '� 6' S � <
� G. '�7 .� � (D O CD � �n CD �. �. v� � cD (D fP (D (D
� � • .v a � � y -� � � � � a� � � w a- •.� "o � -3 � co w o -o � = �c � a b �cs C � � F a
� �- � o �' � � N � � � � `° a .' e CD � � � °c ,��, `D � c � co a. �D °• � � o co o. `° w °c �ao'.
�D � � � � � � �' �, '° � o � a w o � Q. ,�.ti �' � `� ° � ° ,��-. � '� � ^ ;; n. '" D �
O C" » ?» co � �' � r' . �v � o � ^+ �' � �-n rn ^' o� '*
�n� � w = o� � -fD, CD c�i �D � � fD o � � a' ca'o � �o � ?: �' ?.' � w r � t�*D
��� d � co � 'L7 � � co a. r. � co �o °- � o �' o� ° c � :s � O j �
�m � pj � �' � r' p � � � .� p- � ^�" `O. �' '�. ,.p�.' � � ,�j�, �' � � � � v, � � � � '� N
� N C fp bq� N N N � v� p ,.� � O � � � M
cQ � CTJ � � .��, �' � y �' co- n. � a^ ° � :' v�i � '.�'' cc CD °' o � cv cc 'o o � �' � � � � � c�D
° v � `° °c a °c �' � � ° N ° � o a �$ � a � '�° A. c��o k � � n, �' m c°
�`� � w� n. a. C" � o `� b � ?: � �' o n. o m m ^o
o � �o w m
�.o � ° o- :T � :T � � � w. c a w � o• �. �• � <• � � w �cs <' <' c c '. ° <" <' o �
n �. co rn co c� �o a a n. � .n o tc cc cc co � co co �o a. cn o c� cc co -,
.-.w
jN bA bA N 'C � '� � N 7� 'O ��,, . N C 'O �+ N � b11 'D '�J M
� C � a�.> � i� y a� c� a� cd aLi � � O O � � ��
�, ,Y p � � �n a�+ � .'�.+ � � t. ;fl v� � '� � V U � O aJ U > �n � c� N � W ,� � 7 y .'�.. ^p
� y T 'c o o ° � � o � Q L � 'o � � � o ` o � Q 3 �a � ^ • 3 � ° � orn u�
c
:: � (n � � c � o ,� N � �" °' a � � °N' :: °' '� °, -O � = L �3 a�i � c N a,' '-o' a o �' � a o
Q � N O � '0 in � ,� c�C C C �""' � .� y � Q = � cC ` � � s.�. cd � � � Q � L � N . � _ > � � � N
U C cC � •--� �n •.• . �
� � ++ fE � N � � � 4-+ '3 �� � "O � � N � G' O 'fn � � � O � p � 7 � N cUC id � U a
� C !C i.1 p,�y 's., � c�C vi O 'O p� '6 .� Y � y) cCd O C � C H v� 4" "' N 'Y = w � N Q � O
a`� � � -v v °' 3 °N' o. o � •c � Y d � � � � � „ � o .� � � � � � Y Y � � 2
w. J � > �a a -o a� '� -o u � ,c � > c 3 � ,� . `� _
a� c � a� a� a� a� -o v o 'c a�
.. �o � � � � � -v � � a '�, o -o a� a ' a� y -o � a� 3 � c° �, � U
a �, „ C � � �, c � � � � N � a�i b � '� � � b � � a� � � � c. � � � � v�
a o o ' �' � � i a�i � � .�,' ' 4. c�i � c ,� o °�,' ,� z � ' o o � �3 �_ ° •° � �3 � � o � � � a��i
C7 �2'� � '�, F- c C7 -o �, � a o � a �a F- 3 � E-� -o � 3 . '� 5 � E �a '�, E � u F-� s '� L
'O bC0 c� Y C > p ,� � U .
�
� � � � � N � � �
� �
00 � U � ;� '.� � y cd 'O �- .�
O +-' CL �
y �' � L rn cC � y O � �
� � � ~C O �n U �
�, a o o. �a . 3 � �
C N � w v' ¢ � Y ¢ a�i > `n �
s � s. O
� y � � 0 � O � a �
a�+ � y 6� � N > O � u�., cd
Q — bA v t'�. > � � '� Y � t�.
a � � a�i � � � 'O c^�C p � � C
� � c�C bD y � y�'"j o '� � � N �
O N
� .� � � �a a F'=-� 3 '� a H � °
� ,." .y � o[�n `� � c > � � -� � �
� ° ^ � =� � � ° E �
�' -0 3 'x � E a 3 '� o
y d � .�C �a .� � .ai � � •� � �' o �
� � �. n. � � o ro N � �
^G„ '�j � p (Z, cC ' � � cd
C � 3 .� a. w -o ¢, :c ��.�.. E ,o `� °� �
N � o � � a °o v > o y � � .�
Q :3 � � � � � > ;? � .c � „ o
� � � .D a=i c�a y .D ia `� -C c_`'d `� Y � �
N bA c� .� � � O
U OO � c�C 'O � � v�i ,� O E � ^ > O. G.
� c� 3 -S .s ca c ia � F� 3 '�n fl. EL-� .� .� .�
-o � c � � -o � � � -a � a� o -v -o 0 0 �
� O � •+��+ 7 O � � r�n y c�C v�i '7 U
� � � O .,�y, � O L' c� O O � �
cp � o L -0 3 ;�-, o 0 0 3 `° °
y d c� � a� 7 � � .. '� � � � v�
� N N � � O ,� � N o, a �� a a� a� � �
�;,, � N � � � N � y � � � ¢'
ca � � i -0 3 0 .Y �� � E
�
�
y x � y '" 'b °' � � ? N ai ? � � � � .
� �
� �
Q � C
� � � � ro .Ca � � � � � � �y�j E � c�c a�i � ^� a`i c�a
> E � � c > � �O °° ? a ,� �? �, a. •o � � "c� c a
�o ° 3 a. � on .� a�i �' c �a �° E� � � .� a E- .� '� 6 .�
'6 bq � � � � Q L � V U
7 . ' �
O � � � � � � R.
C � U � � N � � 'G ' E
1n C • rn O �O i. .
N y O � s.�. ��i, id � y � ^a �'
.� � � o. o a. �' �a 3 .� �
� +� �- o � a� n.
c v ` � 'D a' '� � •E .'Ua�' > o 0
� � a� � o � ° �
i
C�j �' � � � .4 � L � 8 .b � � �
a � o o � �, � �
� a s `° � � �� � -� � o � � �
� ; � � � � ; � -- �. : N ��
� � � �� � � � a � ° � � o
� �� a H
� -o c � ,Y a � o Y � � .
v o �_ � � � � t Q �
Q � U y 'O L � (O �'O •� E
C N � �
G C� C�� � � � �n ca � �n � '_"' y
d
> Q C , c>
� ¢. o n. " � 3 E
> c`�a fn o � � `" � ° _ .y °" � > � a
+' � c +' $ i � -o °' '� •E 'a _ � o
� :: � a�6i t� � i o > n. � � �
_ � O L � U .� � N cC � i" �
� � � � _ � cd w � � y � �
� ,b � � E
Q � � � � .�on � � v � a �' � '�
N
� .� � c �a a E�- 3 '� a F�- � °
�
�
1. ^o o�n � y � � o y � o
� �O '� C ^� •� V� ,� L
� -a 3 'x -o � � � .v •� "
iv �„� _ c ; �, .N ,.o �, „ � Q
H ai� co — • �, a �, c� o
> R p �+ � E `" o `° `�° � 3 � •E
:. a*, . c a. o o � a� �. � `" �
�s f� N � � �a `�" fn � Y � c� a`�i > ° �
L C d N a�i �n �v . •� �n 7
m �, o n� � �a � o
:; Qc`� E y � � o � > o a � i
Q O � E �' on � � > � ,� -o a� °� �
V � � � � � � � � o � � �
t �
°' � .� � � i � n, �' c
� .� � c � a H 3 '� a. H � E
� � C N v
L � ? � Y � � U
m �a ,� n' �c
d b
c� � a � � � �O �� E
� �a � �a � � ' o ° ��
G) y L C rj � ¢, � � U
� c � 'c a �, � E •0 3 �
� y � � U N ' i, N ��n 7
` � (r� N cvC a'�.+ bA bA a' > o O
Q. -p ''' a� � 'C � a�i
.d.. O � C � > �c v°�i � i `"
Q C) � � � '�- .� c�a � � � �
> �+ p p G' �
y y ` y 'O a' � � � C
0 K � y 7 Q" v� rn
LLI cC � O � N � N �
s E-� 3 � .5 F, s o
N a� a� N v -o �- o N
�+ � � '7 V t�i� 7 � U
�
� N � � � 0 3 � o
d E � . �
> a '" �' " � �
� o °. > � a,
a � 0 3 � c � N .E
a� � •� � �
d a�i � °�,' .? � ° � i a�
�' p o �° � � `� ' �' � '
� y ¢' U � c0 I.�. U
Q p � � � ,� � a�
� �
Z = �,' -o � o L > '� c a
c H � � � � Q. F- .� '� E .�
o a �
L w
a � c �
� o
y�p '�, cv
Q. d � �
O p v� I
aa y a�i �
d a w
V �U
+� o O'o
C �
d � � �,a
Q7 � U p�
� 3 � N j � �
C y � c p � m
.0 y � � � o �
� +.�T O
<x U�
�.._ �
�� V
nv � z m o
=m o ,o� � o c �
O A G � � � N � � ?
C �
� tro � 7 0 � �D �
� � � � y
� d 7 ' f11
O Q. —
Nr• _ � O � , �, � �',
v�i C � '� �. . 'O `O < p � � �
� y � � `" 00 � � � G. 't3 "'�'8
' 7 �,' .+ w ,.., <D
� � � � o � � 0 3 0
� L:h p � � O pj N
� �j G, � W � �' O O.. � �
� ' � � � � " � 'a 'O O
� " w � � o �,• � � �D'
.�►
� O. � � � u �e � .n.
a � � `��° � �' '� Z
�,� a �, �
� a
o � y � � �' ✓ D
v .�
� c�o co y' � co cD fD
a° w w N � ° � � �
� O '*
� '�O � N O� � � �
�
� ,.�. O � � O 7 '
o• C v' �• C M
7 G. co N A-
w .� � c � C �. �' � �-3 N a. �c �. w � � x m 4y a � • � � �c td
�o � o � o � �u � o � °c N° CD �° � ° °c � co < - � w � o w m
a` _ �• c a, `� c -, s� N� � N w co �' � cv � � x �
� � � a =° o v��, �- o ao � � �' � �' °. < �' y ° � ,,�� w �• n' y <
G �^,� .b ry r, 't3
� � �, � �p � O G- � (o Q' � O. � � O `z � � � � � � '� � 3 � O �
`-' CD � .*, A. p cco " c � ^o i° � �. � c° p' c�,o c�'o O' 'p �
� � � �= �o �' �- "� �• � � w � �- �• °- a- �• � N � 3 �
w ,o Y �- � �o o, � w �' m o' � ��^, w' � � � �. � co n: o o � c� �;
o �o �D -, � �o � � -y• � '�h � � CD � � � m 3 �o � <
'° co � � A' ^ .o °�; °= o �. °= � .- � � o m' o� 0� C cD
.� n. pt �O v� C� w p�, (D -, cc ,�.h -�i � �p � p�q' `t7 v, G p � � N
c 'o �. o � `° � co � � ° � � �' � °: a, o � a
m o � o � �. `` �' '�i c � io a3 � A, o � o � �n m�
o' �� xt t`�'o �• -CDi °' ° � � Y vCD, � t�c c`�'o c�o � o tic :'_ c`�'o °' �`�" c�o �
� N a c� o -, co G�
^a a zs c H w 'b �' � � � x �' � '° Co
o N o � o � � � o -�' �o �' �, � ° °c � � < �' ° �'
� � � `� a `�° R^ w n. � w �• Q- � `° °- � w CD � p, f�
O rn � ;� G � < �
� � s c � o o. � � a � �' .a 2s =R a� �o °= � � 3 � O D
'�' �o � o � �+ � '.
� � � � � Q- O c�o � � v�"i � p'* t�'o t�o y N f�D 3 �
O� C � � p= 'C �' �' �. .P�.i Q ? �' <� � C. � N � �1
�, � c'o � o a� "' co w � �'' �' ro �° c�'-o 0 3 n ='C '�
� �D „ w � � cro �, o �, N � � a� o. � � w r. d � � c�D
:?. '� p'�i '.� � C' ' � c�`t � � ^ � � � � d d <D W �
rn O O p., CD � ^ � � � Q- l�• � C ,'� � � �
<' co � � o o- o a
� ° � � � � '3' � ^ n ��n � w ^ � � � �' �D
O tn
(D ?k (D �' .-i P> p < p�' (D 5�" � v� C v�� O r� �
A1 0. W i1. N � ^e ct v� co '+ Co (D ct N V
�
�' �' y �' �' � '-3 C� c �• � � � x � c co ..� W
o w � cc � o � -� � � �, °. � o o � � • �
��., c�o N �s `�° � c"o � � a. c�'o � p- c�o N � " � � D
�� y o �' °' �*, o c o < � � � c�p '*
�Q � � o a � c��o � ^�' s�,' � o ' � � �°�, `� °' �.o D 7
�� w co o' m ,-. c ^ �p
� � w p- o io � � N � ,� w. � � � p � � � �
� � c�o o � y � � '�'y c�v o a�� �,' N �' � � �' p� O fn � <�
�' co 7 . ID
� �' p ,.., vp'. � r,CDn � co =' � � Ol N <
. � c� � Uo y. ,.,, � � o� -� � � � C� fD 3
� -t o = � � A �
� R � N 7 � : � '_. (�'� ,� G (�D �G Q. �
� � O f� �o � �. � p � M
G. � � � c�o O � f�o � c�u c�o c�o � cNo 0. �
C
�' �' 7 c7o � o � � � � N � o S a: N o � � � � � � �' � �
� � � .a o c .CD, v, o w a w �o � � a; �• � w � a. � � � � d
"'� w Q, co • n. �n to � � � �o � � �, :; � �'
� �
u4 w �°a rn ,��, � � � N c,�,' ° � • � N ac •,, � D y
�• w rp o a �' co �' Y �, ?? m, � � � `D ?y n
� .� w R � c��o � � w m o � � •d � �' � a- � � f�D � C
v, � 7
� '° c�v o � w v��,' a� °, °' N c�i p.' � �CDi, � ° a' w � � �' �'p � �
c o �' -, � „ c _ `<� � • s1
?.' � � � aa p, �• c"o C7 o CD � iv �� � �D c�o �D w ., o' � p � �
-+ 5 �
R c � A' � co � c�`o b p' CD � � `� �- � � `.'..' � � O
A. ^ R � �-�i p: `G .P��. � � � rn a; co `O v� � � � � � �
� '� � � .v�i 7 � N O = � � � p!-�� O '» ,� O C
n � (D� �7 r�n� < r�n�
G. ° � ° io p= c�o w� ° tNo c. `e o a co co co � �v a
N D o � � � o o °� � � ro � � n; o o � o c�o c�v � � � o o r 3 w �
�cs � 'rs o. � °. 2y �' m � ,�D, �' -� N � �� iP `�D+ � ts � �� � � n �• � w � i.,'
o w � � � � � �, ;�, �. ^ 6 � � � � o � �. -� 5• � � w w D
't' � p. � Q. C• � ao � `� °'- C' `; � co � oo b '» � -- � f�D
O c�o w• C �' •c7 'O cP � p* ,7 .� �G (D �n pi � '�S' .+, O �' co �( �
p. •p C a v� � � � � � O � n p, �' cw'� � F'n ,� � 'S � `'3 D C. al
ts � o � � co• � w w �' ,, N '�p ° N � � �• ., co w � p' C '*
O � `i�' C � d �-s co p v, dQ co � < <.
�. � � � co � � � a � o� � o �• �• � o � � � � co � � � fD
� -+ � o
� �-*, � � rn p�i rn � � � � c� � � a� ❑ � ca'v tt w � c� �
c � �o w a� < � ., � co o a � ?: w � o � o
� � io �' c�o <. a' c"o �° �: o' p,• �' ��'., = 3: � � a <' C7 w. � o °• c
o� v� : c� -� co co n. a� v, �� ,� co co a v, o co C� cc a � co o.
�a � �s c � C � �' e '-� `� � 5' � = � o � o 0 o y
�• �Do �• � °c � .°o � °c 5,° a � b `„° °� °c �' �� io �' co � n
� � N a -, ° ?; o. ;;, �*i ,� w `�° :.*i a m � CD � c
� .-. w � ,�"- o- o m c�`v � w. `� ¢ � .� � � � " f,..�D rt
W v, io � � � � � � � � � �n `� io � fD
� 9 0 °� o. �' r, �. � °' �' `° y, y • ,� � � � �
`.�" � io :; � �o c`�o �n' � 0 4� n. �' a. o. .� � � m °r
~ c� N
� 'b � '� � � � w � � w � � � = ^ ° � � �
o � o � c�c � � a o � � �I
� .° <� .° �- �' w w N � � c v� o co o si
`� o co o � �- �, o �a y � y
o � rn � � o <� m = � � w � � ' � o' �
w a � a ?'_ co co -� c� � n. '» a � � ., �' �' -, o.
� C " � H = m � �o y
o � o � o � o �' o �' va' � � B o o s
�.. o� �.. �� c o. �s c ;; � � w �� co �
� � a' =° � w a. ,�.y =-h � o � �' �
� � �' ° � `� � � w D D
�. �. � � � � o � co o � � �, w � ?'_ .� D
� .: `O, � G 'Y ,rn. 6' 'z fD �
°` � � w � � �' � O. � 3 < ,��., y N
v, � =T' v � '» � �o v�' o y co C: ,�
co � • w � ",• + � <� N
C � -� � in p' � � � w. � � � .��► fD
�. 'O w � v�i < � �p N . •O y 00
in O C• O p. � vw, '.�7 `" N � � '�
� � O � O � � � ,.�.' � pi � 7 ,.�y G
� w a o�o a �. c�c c�o ° c�o � R. �. � ° `a
�
� • ti � m a. � .-3 N n. c �s w � � x �. � ' ^ .. � C17 � �. � � c� a H � c � � �c
� 9 0 0 '* cc S �s � o � c co � � a o 0 0 � �c � N � w '; � ac w o �D �' co �D � �' `"
m �° �cs ° ^ � `° �S ^� � =° �' oo' " � c � � � � `� o: p' ' " w ° � � " � " v � c '; �'
`�' m °- � o � v�', °- �°+, a�o � ,o � � °' cc Cti w co � w' � �ti o. w o o co -� :;, � D
p v, , �c � co 7. o n, w `; rn � '° i c y c i o' � � `� � c7 �' � • '� 2s v, c�o � : � D
�v w ° Ts < 9 ts Q- w � �, o� B 3 0 �` ° �' w• N � � � � < � o w co �- � �
° � � � ° � � ° � �; � � � ° �a � '" CD v�a w � ,c ?: `° � o B c� o � �
co �a a � = w � a- n. v, � co y w a, co �' o m 7
�� � � � � o o m �, � A, o a � w' � o � n. c `° m �- c�o � � = �o o 'a � � = �;
p� I w � �= � � � a. � � � o. �� � � � `� w w w rn � `." � o' � p' o �' � � � �' v� �, `� 3 � f�D
o � � '�' `� o ^ '� m `° ° = ° � `° N a ,� °' Y � `-9 " � ?: o " � � � m
�`� �' � a- p: � °' � =; w CD ❑ ?; � � w rn o � � � � � �" n, w � w o � �
�" y < �' o o a�' ,� � co
°�o o �� < o� a- �,. � � o < `i' � o m �' �' <� �,? w � � 5- c <� �' o� � �. c w
n -. -, co a co • -� co G� .,, v, co cv co . o n. co �n o co co `� o � co o Q.
.,.w
r
y
d 'O a) a� N w, N N � C Y fn +� �
� � E� � .'�-� � °J .+-�+' ,�' � O � '� � .� L' � .O > p 'C N a� � N C N a� N CJ 0 .� °� C °� O �^
i+ v� � 3 � •� L ,� r�, � � .'�.,, .�.+ . ,.'�„ O � Y L � .Y � > �, ^0
C � Q vi � � 0 � ,� � O cd U N � � � � p .Y rn y U 'C a+ O � cd C Of�
� 01 O 'D '� y id G' ..; � � N t � ' , 'O s-. id O � � 'b O V � V �. O
a > a> o � � ' °��' o � .n y 'Y � � a. c„ 3 0 �o o c a"i � o � c�`n � s 3 ,� ? � � � -`? u a� c � � a o
o � > ., � F' o y c � o � L x L w 4' o 0 3 � � � � a� o .'3 • � .�', � � � � cv
^ c c+�a ccoi " o o 'N �, �o a Y ° o � = a � a o` :c � o a. �o � �`� a�i o 'N ° � 'N Y o d
� � O o a a� � � ��' �'- a, � c"i ai ❑ -o > c'' E o. o a��-i�! o � °' c Z
f� � J L � � 3 � N VI N O � � � � b � 1-�i s" 'O 'b C�i C.' � Ll" � � "'� CC "'d � L V Z
a � c�C U � ' � �.. a�i V � > 7 c�'d 'O � 't7 id CL `� V �C � ''"' 'O c�'C � v� �� p � O cNd v�i C v�i � j � C�
a a� � � � °' � .o � � ; a� � � �ci ° �a = " � a� �� ° �6 `o, a� o � a� o c � �
� �� � .°3 c i '� �o o `o u o �'. o °� ' o � ' -�v °' o � � o � °' > a��i � a� E o E �O a' � 3 �
L 7 C Y � L r�. C O� � O C L �' � � O L � N O �. �., v' O� Q
'� o. c o �e � � a. a � �n . 3 �c 3 a. �a a . ro � E- 3 .5 .c a .5 F- -o � 3 w- � n. `�° °�' a �a x '�
.,
� ? 'S � ? c � � o � � `� � � � � abi o � o �
o �� ,D a� -a w .� a o o � �� '� �
� 3 � ❑ � � � ro � � -o a >_ a b � � �' �
0� Y cd O `� r-. t-� = a. O O `�
r+ y� ,� y i cC O > � ty cC p, cC �., s., d?
d � � ro • � 3 0 0, 3 •� L L n. �c o.
> N a� U � � c E � a� y Q � a�
i� � 1� V1 � � C� Q � i..i y � Uj N Q �
c rn � � ; ° ,� U -o a '� �, > °? ; Y ¢ > �� �= 3 '�' �v
� d - a w � � •� � Y �a � . '�= �
+3 � c � o a. a � � � � ai � � � o ,� o
Q — o �3 � b .5 " � °a. °= °�,' ,�, s' ,� ,.., 'C M o v ai 3
Q '� � °�' � �, '� � � w ro .d " ❑ -' -c N � o �
� a� o • a� � !� �a a� °�' � v � � � c ^ a � �
a c�i 3 0 �o E � a�i � � � �o � � •� �o " a E > `-' � n.
O U O L �O O a) � > '� _C y � � G' � O� � O c) `' � �'
a o s a � .c .o '�, o E� � � 3 o a c. a -o °�' � F- .
� 7 .'�.+ .'�.+ A � � V � Y � c�d
� O �
t� C 3 � w '� o � � c •� v c 3 � �
� � � Y o � C 'C U O � > Y `� ro
� O �y
�:+ Ul U � � � p A. � ''�-' � U � cNC �
C � C y O t 'd '�'�" p, � y y a� cC y �
` "' + 7 O a, y � i � O
y � ❑ .c =o ; o �o ¢ ,o � � a, a� �
- �? o � > 3 � � -- a� � �, .o � �' �
a 3 � 3 � a. " i ,� '� oo � � o
� a � H y ;� � > F-. � o ^ � a
V o c"i � .°�' c °° � o a� � :c
a. o F- � U �a '� ° . �+ s� o. E--� .� w
C � y cd C �O �O V N ^p }. ❑
O v > � O � � � > � � O
� ° `° s' � °' a, °' � 3 � a�i
� � c -o � '^ o •� �
j N o ^o � o o � a y � � y °
�. � °. o � 3 °. � ,� c° � > � a'
� �
� X � 3 � — �� � � `� � E � �
.Y f.�i � � Y �
" � � > ° .� ' ° ,fl � �
Q c0 N r"j C> � 'C i"
CC U
= °: y 3 � � E °' � E � N � �
'� � 3 x �° o o .� .� o o ;� � '� a
�. w w a F- w 3 F- .c '�, �
� L
�'a w-
�
C j� ,b c�a
O � � —
N � O o �
'L > �. 3 'N
� � .
� c c`� '- ~ °'
0
O G� � � � .�
V Q � ? � .o
� a ro � �
� � �
=
� � � �.
� �.
N � �
+� � w
� -a � o
c -o
G' � ei � � ro
� � � � � 3 ��
Cf '
> c`�4 fn O � � � �
++ � C !�C ,� ia � �
�
c +' o. L � E � �a
w a � � �a � '�
Q U
� N N �
� N O
N F-' � o-
�
n � � � � � y a� a� � a� � �
� a � o 'c � � o � � w
�, � �
� � 3 � � 4. �, co-. .D �+. �
� � � � o � � � o
F �'y ti�p c�a — � ? ^o .° � .� — o c�a o � �
a> c� � .,r � � � � �a� a� `� 3 a 3 0
R fn�p � m � Y 3 o c. -o N y �� � a� �� �
� C G� C�'� �' ._ a' '� � �n � L '� ? � a.
_ v � � � '� N Q _ � � � � E
� �' � E � o �; c °a A > �' � � `' a� o
�
Q O Q' V •`� •� a��i o o�, � ^o •� �, � � a.pi �a � .�
fl, � 3 a ° � ; � ; �, ❑ N � ::
o � o -o a� � o � ,c -a �, v o
a o x °�,' L a 3 � � F- � � F- � a
.c ... ,c � a� � a� � -a � c -o a�
� � � � � � V � � � � �
� 3 � �, �c �;
� � > o `'" .c a c '� a, .o >
N � a � � 3 � � o � '� N �, a o c
> +� � � o 'x 'o 0 o a' 3 ^ :3 � ? °' 3 �3
� y � p .� �. w, `" � � � � p, � " T �
� � N � � � a� a� > •' �E 3 L .�
� p,� .a o �o '� �i� i °= � F-�
_ G � c 3 .� a� a .o cy � � w^ �, � �,
Q � � 10 L -fl O G� 'O �.�. y ' � C � �
� �' v�i � � v�i W cC � N U • 'O
� .N � � 'O � .O" p y � ,�? � �A 'C 4+ y U
0 �• rn � G. ' p G> rn � � id a) 7 C •--� �
W � � 3 n. � n. F�-� � °��' n�. � a�i 3 ��' a, °��'
� a� -o N .y • -o
C � Gr cd v ?� �3 a� U
a
a� E E � .n ¢, � a�
> o. - � ?
:: o °; o � c`di -o � �ia
� > � �, 3 c o =' a��i
y Q °�,' o � � °° o o �
.N
Q O V � � � U � 3 v�
Z � .-�. O � y, � � L
� � �. E � � � �' �,
o. � a a� � F� .o
v .'
d v
�O Q. �
d � � �
'G — � �
y +' � >.
O � � �
C.,d; .� �
� O I
a` a ; �
.� w
Ul �U
r.�+ V �' ��O
E � •� .� L
�,a
� d ? �o
rn
� y fA o � m
O N � �y p�
�> � � � m
C 3 k. w O
e� a ��
V
m o
_� o � D
Z� � y 'p �
�
o°' o c � �'
� n � � A
� ��+ �
� O a7
� � �
O
N
r
v' 0 O
��
5' lD
� � N
`� °1 a
vo'
� 3 �
�
� � o,
m
� "�'� K
co 0' O �' v�'i O W � Z
� � n � � a n• � D
P,' a 0 "
<� � � w � rn � �
to ? � R � �p 3
�D � o �' p M
`6' �G `n � <
� � � C lD
C � .��.'� a. ts ,� f�D �
O n � �
r� r►
� (�D O. � (�D (�D t�n
� � � � N �
uo' o � m
� �• � c �' � X 0
� � '.rh n. p, c�' y �
� ' m p� - fD D
`� '� � 'O v' p'� � fD
a
� � �' ° � Nm � a'�
?? `� � � c�'o 7 3 7 -
�' � • � .' <�
w O '� N � � � � N
� � iP � � C.
<• Q- �O � 'p p1 �
� �
rn S' � 7
(�D O. '�7 � �n
�. � F� `�' OQ "O � � � "'d
cp � '�' dQ �. O ("D p QQ O �
'L3 fD '� A� • � C A� �
� n � :-'h .�j' � ,�D,� n '�^i 0. A„ (7 n
� < � p
R' � � c��o ~+ � � g � 3 m.a D
� C . G. � �] � c�o 'O � y � � ' <D
� a � o � � ' o < C � � 7
o f�o v' `� �' `G � i�� �� fD n � � �
� �' �- co � � Ci O N <
� � p'- �C � � � y ,.�y y ` � C1 fD
• y co N O �p p � o — O1 _ fD �,,� �
!o vi � �" � O �� a� �
'' m o- w a "o �o �
" ° � w fD
� �' � c• � � �
7 v�i � c�D � c�v G. 7 � v'Yi V
�
t� � ..j `O � W � 7. G� 'O P�? �. `b N
O C � �, � "�". Po rn C. v, -(Dt � � �
"'q f'� = p� N
� Cy, CD (D ri (/i ^ t% n '� � 6 /�
� �
° �' c�c -CDi � � � � w <' co v�c n O D �
°. < � Q- C] � U" C9 w f/J�'D 'O � 7
� �• � w co � o � .► 0� � � d
"o ., s q�, .d � �' < ,-�. m G. � O _ � � '�
� A' � � w a � Q- t�o �' � CO � � -p �'�_*. �D
� � � � C7 5' � � N g <o °' m <
a co �
o. � o � � b N � '� � c° m � � �
.y � y O ..t O LL �^, 7 ,.
'O � �
O � � � p. � � � p `� � � �
a �
c"o c�o o '�.�' c�c v�c =e � a v, io �
C
�o � � u �. � o � 'o a� �.. 'U �
� c c�c ?: � � a' o• co CD �
� �
fc�-r p' M G- � rd � '�'�' � ',�� 7' D �
O Q' � O v'. �. w C' lD (10 � �
� (7
� � o � � � � � ry � � � ' O
a �; � �� � � �. � � � 3
w o N � � °' °Q �S �' c w c�D �; 'a
� � � � o � a rn � rn � � �
�n c rn rn �n � < 1
n p� �t ry C �„i p (�
o. � w v�', c�'o � ts � � � � N
cP Fi' < N � `` n. �f 0
�, � � � � � � � 0. �
o � `� w o a� o ^ �
" � io c u `p• cmo �' <
c�o rn v", v�'i O. �. � O.. v,� co
. N � �
� �• � �
� ?; D
• �. � 3 r.
. o � � � 7
w a �,
c�c w _
,� B �' C �•
o � CD � cD
� �
,.n. v' o
�' G
� � 0.
'ci ? �]
O � ,3' n
�. � �.
co C
�
� y
O m ^ � f�D
A� � �
� � � Z1 7
. cc m <D 0�
❑, o � a �
m
�o �, � �
� ' � =
'. � o v
• c —
;' `a
�; �- ^� � a �c �o •� �s c � C � �
� �o �o c�o � " �D ,U° o rn o � o ;� �„ �o
p� ,� � � t� �' '� C cP co N � � P� •a
� ^ " ¢ �` co o D
� o � ,o�� m � a �' c _ �o = D
�, ° � `° Q- �°n � `o �,� �� � `° N m. ° � �
c�o �' � O O C V co � t�c a' y 7
-o °' � ^ � < � a- �' � �a fl: �
p � � � c�o y � � ^ �D � � o � <
.i �' � fD
�
,-�n. � p a p � .�'�. o � Q � �� � Sl �
� � �. � K � 0. O � O � 'J' O.
0 � � 7 (�D � O. vNi � Oo O. � (�D -�i
�
�
m y � 'o '" �d m �rs ^+ � a� �cs � w c. � �o -� m • ., � .� � w � �o • �o � w ., •a �y �
� co cP o v, ., co � co � ., �- co � co '3' � „
� � • � o e o � a� o o CD �' o � a. � o. �� �' �� � o p� � o m -, o. � m o �
� � �' .��. � � TJ 0. � 3' f7� � � � � co� � � � � � � �-�s �, 7 C T3 � < K � '� � �.
m `t � � �o �• � o co �' co co a � c� � c� o o, c� � cn � n, o a o i�' � �• p- • D
o, �, v, cc w o �o m co .,, aY • N �, co � a �- y ^o
O c'�c v�, co � �' v, . ^o • o. � v� a. �� o � � � co ac �! � �° � N ?» c'�D D
�7� o ° <• o., �" w ,� p, 'o � < � 3„ �� � '� � <� � °° pq °- � co � r' ^'
o n �o � ro -,
p � a o � `n � N c�o ° � p ° c� � �, � `° G' w, � `° � � n. :ti � aa C^DS o N Q- � c�i c3i 7
'Lf CD ^+ � cD c� O cD '�h < 'L7
� m O ''7 C � f� (D ,� O� N "" � " '� � O � � N 'S � A� (�D � = n (�D f) O � ^ O � � �
v� � a �' �� � � °+ � � p- o o w �' '' � 2s c � � � �' c�o o n' `� � rn � �o rn c O <D �'
cQ ..� � rn p� � -� . `G ,.w., � b -� a p- O � � p- D � � � o 'L7 U�o w � 7 N fD
� ts o �� a' -c �, o` o ° � < c -o �o c � 'b • co � �' -, o w w co
� °�' �- o �i � �a � o• =° o � � °' �s rn w � a -� � � � o � � � o cv � �
�`� � �. � o o � � �. � � � ?; � o � � ,� _ o o J � �. n. � � �• � n. �
n�� O. ^' � O. cno in N in� .�+�, '.�'� �-�i v�', � � c�o := O. � W n� � N (�9 � ,��+ in� `�C a ^ (�D v�'i � � in � �C v�,� �'
...W
��
o•,c'
�o <
�.O � u► O
� � ° � �
0
�m � � fD
� �
O
�� �
�-.�
m r
� �
A N o 0
�- ��o
� � � N
� fD
N �' � C.
0
w � � �
�
� � <D
� �
? � � �' � t�o �
C
vi � ,.�� �. � A� C Z
a.'_ c. p ,� cy a, �• O D
�
3 � o- � � � � o
?: " 'a � < � �
• w '' ° Sn
< < o c�' p _
� o co � �o � 'C <'
� � �
, �. v� n �• � <D
fD �
0. � � �
� � O �
`< `G � � �n v�
W � 'O r�n � C
; g ,n �, m � k v
,��+ � � � n' � y <
�' � p, 7 � p� = fD �
v, N 7� p •*
. �, N � a � �
� �^ � �-' < N �� �
c �' � o �' 3 > > °:
.�'» C' v, • fD .' <
P. ' � � � � C fD
N
`G �• C � 'D O.
'-� � a. 'T� C1 �
w �
T �
� � � � �
� � �
� � �
� w
w n
N `D � � 3 �O D
o � y � � � �
-+ �• n; � �, �
� � c� o .� � °:
�' � � ai o � <
�' G � °1 �� w �
3 - �
� a Q �
o � �
� co V
�
�
p� � tJ � � '0 N
M
„N�, � ,� vi w � D
� � O � a � � �
� c n, � C� 0 � �
�° � � � v, fn � 'C .r 7
< '� �. a' � � M 3 � �
o °. �*, O � O fn 0� <
a' � w � co �p O�i � < �
o. 'Y � � — C) (D 3
`� �' C � 3 � � �
� � a. 'n °' n
w �
? � � c � fn
� � � � �
C
� �
� � �o � f° c
� � � � w � �
�
w a' � �s a � D �
`° � — D
e' c n. �
cv cP �, ° ,� �*
,a � � � N � O
< o � � < � � 3
n: fD• � ° c�o � �' -a
�p n w v, •* G �
0. � � � � � y
� �' _ � � � �
� �- a 'o
�
m
� � � � �
w � b � � �
n. o CD �
�
�. n. ." � � °' � 3 �
� y � � o � fxD 7
`� � v'• O (D C <
� � O
O �^ � �' fD �
0
a o � o � �
s � � a� _ �
v co n. � a v
�' � �' co � 'b
�' C �D v w` c n
°= a '° n. �' c
=R �,° � � D
w � o 0 o N �p �
d � � R �
�
fD � � �. o � y �*
m �' � `� CD C. �
� c, w � cD
A. � ,.�. O= �' � v
� � � p- � 0�
n
�" `G S c�c v'�',
�.. � n � n 'TJ w W 'C� VQ � '17
� � � cSc � � � ^ ° w m 6
o � o � o ?' ,� �cs' � ;; o. �
o w �� c a�'o °Q rn o D D
� � a � � �
o c�o 'T� n. w � �'
a. n. w � -� o � � �D �
�o o � �. w v�D, � ,� a < y C►
A. p f�� fl. �
(�D UQ � � � � n S � � N � � �
' w � 'cy '� C ��i, � C 'O `G �1 00
O �•
:; � ° a � p. ,�° c
� 0 0 �' � o �- w
� '. w �
� a � c�o �' �° c�o n. c�o n
�u N ao a� � N y �c c .-3 o w � � � 'C a� ts � N zs w N � w n. 2s ^o
� CD Vl �`t CD � 'S [A C� ..��. �'1 ✓'t fy � � CD ^ � �
v° o w =9 0 .° C `° =° � '- �o ,� �s � ?» � =R �v° n: � v° o c � c<o `° '� i� � " c � c fD `�° �' �
0 o cc � a � � co � �; `� � � co 0 o co 0 0 0 0„ � o � � n. � � cc � �' D
� � '" *' � N a o v, 5' �, � N °' � a,' � ° � " �'. �°o o `� °= � N a 3� o �, �'� � D
2 " � �c�o = w o 'C �. CD r. < a. �' a .� < � p- � � < co ^o io ^ °'_ r� �
a �� � o. w � c y— � � �. ° n CD `�. .� o �D � 'a �D °- w � CD � O � �
Z �v o w N � n. � o m � < � � '� � w io �, � o �� � � �, �, � � 7 �
� o � o � �D �'�. � � �. o ° �' �' co � �. y� � ° '» cc' � C o � S � = � °r o
o �' c °c � � �• <• � u�o � � � °o `° o ?» � c�o � " �= CD �, rn � � a. � �., o � <. 3 fe � �
c�o� � �' ° a a. o co �y �, °' °Q' �, w � r- � � � n. co fn �p
o�, �, � �. <� _ .� ^ �o � � �, c� o � �- <� E �o ,�,� co �
cn� � � y �D p. -, m a cv n "� ,_.h � � o. o �, � c�o w �o m � a. -, P; <p �
v(D � vwi (<D � � `� fG' P� �' n O � � �.,] A� � � � � � � '--J y �• K
�� • s � -_T, c � � � co y ?; � � _ � � _ o � � � < o' :s �,• �' �' �: c c � 5' <
n�cn � � a w v� co co co �t a �o a. v cc v�' .., co co co co � cc �o �o a� v� ct i� to to m
V y
�' ,�..��, -�
a� Q a� �n �o a� a� v �n .O y v....,� � >, �, � c� v a� rn cd .x ^o a� C a� a� ��`�� a� � U
vi � .� O > � N �L � � O � •� � 7 c� 'O � C � y � � � � � � rNn � t O � .0 t .0 N O
y � c � � � � N � � '� � Q, 3 � -� 3 � ° � � 'o 'o ,� � F� � a o� � � .� � o F' m�
rn 'o o �c o 'v � o � � .°�' � .o a n. � � .� 'o o 'o o � o
d N C 3 � � �' � a a� i � � `� � � � � 3 � o �c Q � � � o •� 'n .b � o, ` � ?' o, � � �,�
r > ���—., a� � ^ � y F�-� o � � ° � p. c°�i � �= � �'j °� �' '�' .� 3 s�. � � � � " � •� � � ��
� v� 4.
L � t�i �«. c � °�' � o 0 0 .� .� .� � c � '� a. .� � � � � � 3 � � 3 3 ,c L � `� Y y �L Q W c�
C p o a� a� � c� a, a� a� y °� o a� ca ^o a� � � a� y o = o � o
� � J c E � a a � � c � � a� `� o � a .� � � > �? a a� > o � � > � 'u b `�°�
r o a ' � • �- .� o c° �a � ° � c s' '�c w E -o � � '� �, • c�. ' w a °�,' O
a 'N ° c 'b • �C � .o c • � U � ,� �$ '� rs a� �a 'b ❑ � ' � � '� c � � " ° c '�° .. o
Q � N L � � L F+. � �G S-. �'^ � O L � N � y� N N
U ,L�' � � O � � � � '� y "�C Y N „G � � �C vi N 'v� G"' O «�. ..�j ,� � 'O P" .-�"'+ aa�- N ¢' � ,� � y O L ro � N
C Y N y y a) C — ^+ N � C �
F� -o �a 3 a o a c a �a d � E-� a� a �. � . 3 � '� F- '� �. . . �a on . a F- •o �a 3 0 �, a �
O
`� � y a� `� y O L � a� y � C ^O a� rn y ",
V ,� '� � Y b cVC � �' � '� � +.�'.
G "O y �' .0 C Q' � ¢' � 0. 'C
�C � . C � � C� � p � � U
00 � -' 3 3 3 ° � � � a� � � w a, 3 � °
> � � ' �° -v � o. c a� 'o �. ? ,�
d a� � � � � a� E o Y � ,. a� a� �
� O = � w °' a�i � a r'' o -C °' c� .� .� a�'i 3 c`�e
�o � c ai
� � N � � � � � � �- o � � N � � 3 � .o
+' � ° � -o � > � °' 3 °�, E � � b >
a a .� � � o 'n c �°�' .a � � a � .� �° 'c w � � E
a�
� `° N o o °' .o '�, ,c °' � �, � `° o no �a � '3
L�-I i�i .� P+. � CC L L � •� •N •Y Cl+ L � VI L�. �O CC
U � � � � U � � y V � �
� ,� 3 .� '3 �c � .� a� �
'o
'� o
t� c � o � -o � �ro c. � =o
G� � � � � '" ,� �n Y y -o
> '� � 3 .�+���^ 'o � � � °' '3 ca `�
� d '> a o�n a' � � '> o .�
� � � a. '�. � ' � a�
:: � `� o o � � `� ° � c .b �;
� � y � � � �
a 7 � .b ,� o -o � .� � -o e��^, o a�i -�o�
U � ro N � o N a >
� c° o a�o � o �
a � °.' � 3 � a °�,' 3 '�, a, x a
�
� � � � � y � ? �a s a�i �
� � �
� °� 3 w a' � a' '� � a�i
� o E
G) c ,� o �
d y � o,o c,, 3 w. � � � �
> .� '�, >, �. a� -o
a .o = c, c � � " .� 3 'o °`'
C d ? � a� �
� x N o y � �, ; � o a� �, p. �
� °�' o � `�° .� �
Q U � � U � � V N
� �? � 'O 4: p 'O
� c�'�V � ,'L',,, •-� � y � id 7 � a' �
� °' °' � °' � °' 3 '� a 3
a � � �3 a. �. �e a �.
� a� a� �, � � � ❑ -o a�
V � ,L N y V � cC N �
. cd -� cC � � � y
C f1. 'C ,L �"" LL " O. -p >
O '� c � o �3 '9 � `� a o c
���
N o 3 � 3 �
�
'� � � ' a�i �. � � Y
U
Q` la d c� .x �-+ '�' O � '� � N v�
L '> c�d O
> O ,.0
� L � ; a, � s, � ; a� �3 F, :�
� .a: � �' o '� � � � o S' >,
V Q _ � -o � � c �
� �
U
�' Q � -° � o -o c .� � � �,_, � �
�� � � � a � ; � ro � � •o .v
� �, ^ � o .� � � ° °° � a�
� a � a. 3 �a a � 3 '� a .,
�
fn y °J a� �, � � � ❑ �o a�
i+ V � � .�' y V � .y N �
V -a f.1� 'O .L' F-' !�. ¢ N
'O >
� � f�C � p 3 'fl � w � � cC
m � 3 ^ N o, 3 E
� j � � � � ' a�i s. a��i � �
a a� � � � � .o �, �,
> e�a y o � � 'x w 'o o = '� .c a�'i y
_ '> ro �, > '> o ,c
+' � c � .� ; a � a, � ; � '3 F. .y
= r.d+ Q, G1 fn "' 'v� y "' o � A
� � �
Q O � � c -o � > �
w � c� -o � � .t7 � � -o .p �+ � �
Q � � N p � � � � � G� •� ,b
�j a � .�' o. 3 �a a. i 3 '� a �
�
�
�. � a� a� �, � � � c �o N c cq
d � � � � � � a� � � � .
� � a �° Y F- °. - °o, �, 'b
�a _ c � � ' .n � � ° � �
� i"� ti� ca ° 3 '" �- �, a � a
_�a ~ 3
d c.� � y � ' abi �., i °' � ¢
� e-r � a�i � .� " � � � .c � � _
�a fn tp � .O •> � !� •� -d '> o 'Y � �
d a�i � � y ° n' °q A' ` ' � 3
c, E
QO� ER�' ° � �° � .�? � � > on
U ' C
C.� .� � "Y O� � � .� � 'O 4" y � 'C❑
� � vi � O N � � p p�p O � cd
a °��' .�' c�. 3 ro a. °�,' 3 '� o. �a a
� a� a� >, � � �
` � � 'fl "y � � U ,-�, � � L
C1 � 0. 'C .� F-' ��., � "' p a�
� a � '7 � ^C cUd O � iO
N � � o� � 3 3 � `� �, a. o c
� c °' 'c � � � � °� „ � ? .Y 3 ?
� � y o � � � •°; ° ^ .� � �
c � � N �? � � ° �$ '> o � .� `�
� a -p a� Q- cn � '- a�i a� �3 F- �
++ O C C `� o 'N v ai "' o -fl >,
Q y �a � -o � > � �
� � � . �
0 X •� �,°, -5 � '� c .� '° �v w � u
� � o a� � � � G �a �
W a � �' n. 3 � a�. � 3 '� o. �
Y b � � � � � �. � � • �
� � � �
� cd � U p 'O ''�'' cUC � '6
� d � 3 w a � a. o „ 3 'o 0
d E � � c°o o. 3 � � � n' �
T cd a�
� � � a `� � -� ^ o o w � .�
� d �> � a� -� � 3 'c ° �
N G�1 v�i p Y Y [� ti �.
�+ . �^ �n v� � � O
� '
a � " -° � � .o � � a�i :_ N n. 3
p •� � � ,� � �. ._ = �,
Z � °' � � ' y o°. �; � � � H
a �. � 3 0. � �a
+-' ,.
�
d � a �
O C. c�� `�
� � U
a '�
� — o�n °
� � .N o0
O � � �
O`� � 'y
O
a` a � �
a "'� N
�
� N O
Cy7 � � O
t+'0 � 7 .x �`� p
i p N � �+ �N
d � N p" �' � O
Q > ,� n Z
� W � mU
� ��
��
o'�' �
� �
O�i ° 'T � <
�.O " ��-_►, fy/! �
v'� cu =
�� �� � � �
o �
�O �
��
m r
� N a �
�, ,� o
�o
�
� � 'r°n
"' �' °' a
w �; 3 �
�� � o.
�
� �
�- o 'o �, o o `o �
�' c .° � c �' � � Z
°= o- ° '� o- a. 'o' � � D
CD �' m �, w � ,�
� � a � � R � �
" � o � � ` � � m
� o �� F �o � � °: � =
a, �• - � � < � �.
� � �' �
o. .� ?., w � '
� c�o 5- w o' � r.
� � � � � �
w � � c�o � C
�D � CD �' � m
� °' o � °- " y 0
=
� � O 7' O � 7 � �
c-�o p. � � '�'t a �� �
�. .o �� ; �• N t� 3 a�i
� °• ° � `° 3• � � <
a � � o' ' o� c �D
6.. :"' A� � (Q � N
`G � � � � O.
o 'a y �D
� �' �• � � 3 '
�, � � a �
� � � � i � w o 5- S' e � � � `a' o � � 5' C� C� B = � �
to ° �° a� cr �' � �° � ° � a T' � cc =� � o y co 0
w `a `° N a, �' = � w a �;, w " w � ."-�• �' °o- � o a _y � a n
o io' A. � o �'. aa � ,.�.i w � ro � o p
'C rn
�� � o �' o co � o- � � � ° �' co n R � 'C -�+,i °' o � .-� � �.p D
� �' �' � w • m io' co w� a y• � o � v, tD c>
� p. � � ,co. c'_ � � � v, � � � � = n, � y � �p 3 �
n' ^o `� ,�, � °- w � � ,� �' v�, �. 'ti �, v C' � N f/) o�i
� °. � ?: � -�i .,, �' ao N `'-t C�D � j- ° `��' � � Q° °• w � 0) O N <
to �'+ < O '' a'_ v� �u � — 7
� � � �' �. ,� � � ?? w P: o � � � � � � co Cl � p� � w �
� � o �' � w co � c�o p, � c co oa � � � 7 01
H � o w � p. � � <_ o � � p- w � a y � n' a
v��," �G �' a � n. =; o ° io � ° a. cso c�o an c�o d w � � �- V
�
� � � � � b N
� C �
-�i � � � �
,,��., a' o ��i, p, c�. (�p r►
'r7 C'f Q D �
�`�° CD ° w ° � cn � � m �
� a � � :� o °.�', � � .�
� o � � � � ; � � �.
a �� ='� 'Y � � c�i t�o
� � �' � � �
�e � � B� � A �
� � �• � w a �
� � � a � tn
C
� � � � � '� 3
� � CD w c
.�".. ¢' � � n- " D �
0
� � o �- o � D C�
� � �
a �
n' '.� �'' � 5 � y� 'a
� o � w c�v o; =� at
° � � ° � � N
� 7 �
`� �' � � B °' 7
�
� 5 �• � �
�' � � a �
� o '° �. o � � s
� c ;d � c ?: � v,
='_ o. o =; a, a, c,• �= y
� � � ry � �
� � ^' � 6 ° � �' a �
�`�,� �, �. �' � =
c � �� �° o `D uC, �
� . �. v� c� � ID
A. � W 'O �
'.
w
� c�o �' w o� �
'< `G �9 ❑ � v,
� •i .b 'iy p � ,� -p -�
� � �• � � C p �' O � p v�i
� `< � (D � O "'� � N O �' C�
a c
� o � N o � a. � 5• � o. w, � D
� c �o ,, � ^o � .�, � ^o ^_ � �
^ �' �c � _. co
� a b � Y < �• �• v�i S iD� � !�D d
p� � O � �� c� v, � � t� N y _•
'<' a = o• � � ?'- � a �
� � �° � � �� � � 3 a � .i
co o =i F .a o, w
w • � o p, N
� n � � � � 7 � �
�. .^ O- vi
° � � � � a � o c�o �D w c- °. n � � :° n.
,.�'�, ?; � � c"o m °- o N °- " � �o' o ° n. D
c � o' ° � n' � ,o c �' �, ., " _ D
a � � � � c�o a � � o � n. a `� � � ce
�• w co � �y c�o � � �p �
�' •b p. � Q' -�'i � v� n < y O n' p y N
� co � � � � � O � � co v' co �' � .�o ''� <D �
c cu °- � � `o' � ,� g —y• � c��o .�', �D
co 'o 0 0 ^' `' ° �• � � � � o c° °' p� a°
w �°o = �o �� ° �- ,� � .n r. o a o �.
� w �
� G. C�D ► .�+, � rn� `G ? O- in � G. � ^�i ��*,
ro N .� �, A� � P� t3 "� N '6 N -y � W O. �] '� �h trQ P.�. ' 'z � '-� � � � � � �. �G y `d p� 'C �t �n
c � �, � c. � "` `�° w -, m � o co �' o � c o � a. �' o o `��° o ao o c o y w
c �' ° � ° 3 ., i� < co " cc � ts co � co co '_v � c »' o- � �
v, a -, �cs p: ts G -� co 'c3 w -e p c ., -, c p,; rJ �s �rs A. cP
3 � o �o CD o �' m o. � o � c� � n. � � co o a, w co o � Q. � �• � o co D
� �' �� � C� w o• m � � � �, r. w o �, � -� w � � o. �� o �' � � � � � a' o,' i � r. D
co r. �v o• . ts �o ,.� �D
_ � � iv N� c�o a^ c�o Q' p= 0. 0 � � � c�o 'O �� � c�o G. � � tc � � � 0. � � � cNo � � � O 3 �
o < � � � ° '� rn ° o 'c � ='' � w cu � fD o < = � n c� 7 �
�„ w � � e -s � � . w � � � co " � �- .t�, v, d = 9�
�' .� � �G � � �� ° cu � -� o -e �' c � `° �" �' cc '� '_'. < = �
N ry p co io cp' '� c�o � "' � C � '� � � � O � n � ar � �
0o m c�c � w � c��o � w' m m � io • � a, c w o � co w . � � o � co O N < D
co� ;�- w � o ,, � � ^ � rn o. �• G co °' Y � � �' �' � w �' ^ 7 N cD �
c�n� � � .a � � N � o N m � � o < � °- o o `� •� � �' v� � � y
�.m w o y w ,� w .��. � co �' y � � � .. � ? � .'
�V � C ,^� �' ,'�' � S O �' :Y S < O� 7' y.' ? N � � � � � �. � A� S � fo� S ,�..� f�D
N Cn v� O.. v� (D (D ��i,� «., N (o N N '� ct (o -� P� in (D co lD in `G �G cn cD v, v� cD in�
�O y
��. ��,. r
M U
- c a� N >, �, N a� a; a� � c� -o c c� �; � a� c a� a� a� a� w .� °' �a y a� _ � � ., m
o � � � � � � a"i a"i -a :�, -fl :� � °�„' ,� �e z '�„ � ° � E .� � ° ^� � Z '�„ � .� �? .a�, � ��o
'� o �, 'o 'o E- > � "� k ,�, � �� .a N ^ o '° x ti, -o � •�, o .o �,a
� +� � a� � n. a �O � ,� � ' 'b � 'o o � o y '° � a � � a � `0 0
V � L, U L � >, 'C7 C V U C •� �+ �. . cd ❑ O 7 � p)
y (n C a� �, a� c� Q -o v ^ o .d . ca a> � a� �C � c� � � � •� � � a� rC 3 -o .o ^ 3 � .m
> d o `' ,a; 'o � � � .Y 3 � � s�. 'o �, s�. � � � �, � � � � o o. �
r > t, 3 L � °' � � E � o ,� c,, � � � �9 'o E a� ¢ � > a, -c � m
!6 'y� � G' m ��1" ^� +r 3 � � 3 y � C3 � � o s., p � CS � � 3 m LV�
� C V � N � � � U � 3 O � C �' O+ � p, .� G' ❑ rn � ,� 4' id ,� U ,�
� O � °A `" a� ro -o a� � �n o • � � a� o �n a� o � � "O � �
�: L J y � ,c � c a� ? :', �,, a� ? c o ,� �' � � °' .E .b � '� ? .o "' a °' � � °' `�°�
� c`�i a� � C � o �' �ti rn � � � a� �- � �, v°�i c v�, °� `d w � �
Q Q 'C •L7 4i � y c�d -C � � , � U .p � y 'iC O -p '6 U p �C .p r, id '�p U �' •
°' p, -o � � � � o � � � a a� '� � a� E a w^ ° °�. °' .� °o. L �v �> `'�� �, = o. a��i o,
� o o�n o '�, A" o �' °' .� .°3 -o °� � ,°r' �? � a� � o � a� � °' o � �, ° � '� � °� � � � � 'C � ,� �'. c
L a� C a� � ,G a� s� .� � , — m
3 '� s�, � 3 ro '� E-� '� � ia on � � a. Cr «� ^o � 3 cc a � � a � W o. � ca F- '�, �
O
�C N � 'C U �y�^ U ^O � U ^O p
O � � � �G' ,\,?, � cNC C cwC cNd "'�'
3 � c�a o Cr �t ` °= " ' a� (�
� f6 j O � ' p, � N O. a�
i+ a� � � 'O �O � �O
y � O iC V � � z c�d � > N cd � >
'G 'V
� � o � � � � � � p u�. � � p s�.,
,�. ��0 3 �' � �� 3 °�
Q — o � � � o � o �, � o o �, �a
a a w o -o d � °' � Y L °' � :y
� � c � °�' ry, ❑ a. � n.
E�-� ,� '� o W.5 ti y .� a E�-� � .� �
v O U �, 'O U � U 't7
� wca a� a�
3 -o � �� w �
m 'o'++ �� '+�'' c�a o Er tl 'y" +.°�.
a. a ,� � �
~ a�i °' .� � a �C -o [
' �° � � � � � z � A >
a aNi °N' y w o 'O k � -o �
y � o � � � y a � � i
�+ G� � � '� , � �, � 3 �'
'a N °' � � = o � o � �
� � � � � � ¢ � °- � �
v � � � �. N � �
� 3 � .� � W.5 � � .� �
� Z � �° c °�' � °' °N'
�
b x ,�, o °c � N �
� c � 3 v°Ji avi �° c
d
� y � y � � � .D o •_
w � � ? � -o " 3 0
�c �o `� � � '� � � •a'
` d c .c �L L 'T �, .o '
,�; X � b ti :� � o � � � °� �
Q � b � c.i i� .� '� � �a G' �
'6
�' L L �
� Q � � � � � �
� N
�Q O. E� '� 0. R. 0. f�" cd � .'�..�
'C U � >, 'C❑ y N � a� O
'O � a'�.� cC cC a' '� p �
�.
� O � C �' " G' � C
7 �.. O i. �
N � C CL � � �. ..�. � .-�-� i0
� O � y � � � � � 0. �
�� ' � � z � ,a � 'y — ^
O� _ � y X � O a' � y v�i � � cC �
a`� d Y �v �C 3 o c,, L a� F"' '�
V +' � � � a� c � ¢� ai .o �
Q — ° a '� °N' °N' > �� � w° N
� a b ¢ � � � � -� �� � -� �
� L
� y � Y L V � '3 y � L
� a� .S � �c .° -o x 3 a F'�-� 3 ,c
�
N � � N
U
i+ •� � Y � �
61 �
a � � � �
� y" !6 0. 'O �
� j �� � �y Z �� o �
O. � � b � 3 `'
> � fn O � o
k �
� � � � r � b �
f4 .�
_ +�' O. L � � � y 'O
Q� a 0 f"1 0 ¢Q', '" cd .
w+ � 'O Q' V � .O" U
Q N � y, U cd
v� sy Y •�, CL
N �
� .� � ro ro .�
�
1• '° � �' °' c " � E :..' >, � a� a� c a� � a� �v -o a�
a> .a � ;� � �c � � o .N :� ,Y � o � o -o � � �
o � 'o � -0 3 '� �� o � o
� 'O o h > p, �, o �. a a E .� 0 3 � b
c0 .. C � � � a� � o -o 0 0 ° a
F- M ti ia � a '� °' w, � � a, `� �s .� 3 °�' � � �, y �o 0
> �o c �+6 � Z 'y o °�' ° ° �� i ° °= � � ro v, '�oo � 'c C 3
:. a y � a�i -a � 3 � � o -o o � a, °A ,� � .� '� � 'u c, y
C � d � 'B y k � o � w O C � � � �^ •�, ,.��., �? � c�d c�d
`m aci � � N � � � � 0 3 �� 3 � ❑ � L �
° `� ° o on � ts.
�
Q O � p � o � ''- � a�i °- ;t i E i o � � c��a '� =o E ° o ,E
U �v � u `° °' � ``'' F- � E � 3 � `n c'' °�i0 � E � `" �
a� o � '� � >, on � 3 � o°. .� °? ° ° '� � i ,�
� zL a� � r ai � p sy � o k o a� w
GQ .� ti cC cCd .� 'O �v � � r`1i � a'�.. G. c�C .S v�i � O O F-� �
'O U v� N rn
C ^p � ,'�',,, '� ,'�,.,
� � �
'�6 d o Er a�
�� � U
d � L � � � � �
�
b
y � � •� � z '; 3 �
�o d u� o �' o
L � � N � x �
� b �
°y' o �c `" � ,� -o
a � r � o °' '- � .
y N 'CS Q U cd 0. V
� �j v�, a, y .^ p,
�
Gq .� ti �a � ,E
b
r
C o
� d 3
> C. a� �
'4 O � Q.
d � �
i > i.�. ,�
r � y �
a O � :o
Z � o
H �
U � � � � � � � O O �
� V � 3 � �
'o a ° � � � > � o °�
� � -o > �' � ¢ � ,�° �
a � � o � o � �
�
� �6 v o �' o. � .� .� a��i ' r�'
O C � o � cA .. � � � � U v�
Q-�+ � `o. .d '`� � '3 � � x v� � > �
La° f' „ � � w o E
on
a c F�- 3 °o. .�'�. �° °�' • c�
� �
� � o
cyi � r ' o
> � � � � rn
�' � � p F-� o
C
Q
� o y � Q �Z
o u j ` � a�_
I- �' m U
� a�n
�� �
o,�� �
m o `� <
�O � y O
o � '� � 3
�
�`P �
�.O i`' �
�m
�
m . . . • 5' �' ao' o o � �
�7 .CD.�, � o co c �D � �
v, � O
� �• o o G7 'z o 'T� �' o 0 07 O � Cn �' o C� 7 � (� � C" n � Y 'T �'C � � � �,' � � ��
m -�, o c° � � � o °c a� � � o � w ic � � � C � � a°� � o• � ^o � r�i►
� m v� w �D 'b � w oo w CD v�c 7 � �' v� o °' C o � . � c a w � ?: � � � C.
o c � m ° w o ❑ � � o � � I C � o lTJ 5 o co '� o w �
�a `� ti � `� � � �. ,,..,, � ,n.� W w � a �
W °�' � � � p* � � � �' � w � w a � `D' � � � '�6 O
C-' o � '� C-' o � ^C m C" o� o�• 'd -a c�'o o C w co � � o � �
� � p., m� �' � C n. w� � � � C o. o X' .� °: v� m �n � co c�o ,�"» '� .'
w .�
o � Z
p- � D
� � � �
�,• �o fD <D
<
�
�
� �
=
w � � �
f» � � �
c .�+
a
< � p= � � 07
w
o �. � A � k 0
a. ,� � � y c,, N <
� m
v, p, � �p � 3 7 p ,�
� p_� .a fD
w o � � " Nm 3 c�i
r' � a � � � =
� C `' z A' � � " �
��
C Ci. 'C � � � N
� � o 'V �
at
�, �, o.; � �
� � �
° co m � a
-� q .� o o � w Ts y c _ o o � � �. �• CO �•
n. w �' � '"' ° ry � � o `--r, o � .o' � cso '"' o o � �; �
�, 'ts�
�' � � ,-_, �' o c° � � o N c`o N N -_, '° c��n � n, ° y n. m (�
n. o CD B o arca � io � � c�o � � °. w �o o � O �
c io o B °' �' � a' co °c �` _ ° � � �' o- a � ❑ a � 3 m 'o �
`� ,Cw -�i tr_�o. O a 'O � p. � p, � � p a � y � � fD ID
M
'n vn..i � < ` O 'y � c�o C �y '� `G� co �n `G '� � �' k O. �' fD f) .�+rt � d
"O f)� fD CD fD �n' �' �
°= o �• � �• � w � v,o � °rn�° � � �; �' Z � w � � � � <
CD � � � � � o � co � '�� �D .o� ?� � y � y C� <D
,.��'., c � � � o o n. o �' � °= � �' �' � � � =; ^ � 3 � �'a pl
�• n' � o � o � r. a � � °- `��° p' o � � Q� � A ° w o. a
� c � � o: °a :s o' � � �. �' w. o c o � o � � n. � V
co a. a �c � c� � cc cP �' � .,, `a 9
�
�• � �, � �• � N
�
w �' � p a � �
D � �
' w " � � � O D �
a, � � ° N �-a .—. �
� a: � ^' °: 3 � °:
° p " " � ocn c�i <
n. °' � v = cD
a. °c �. Z w � °1 c�, � �
� °' �° � � � �
co A o °. �
� a
r.
v��,' c�o v��,' � A. �
C
o. o � ro o o a � � � � � �
_ � � � � � � � � p � �
� a � °. a � w w �, h Y a- y �
� ° a�a �' S; � �D �' -�°o � — D �
�,' c CD �y � � co � ° � ^.
� c� y � � F aa a' � n � �
3 -� m � � �, o � x' � � �
w � � Y r, � �c' w a �e w � =� �
f* �' � 3' �c' �, z r! < �
• � .a• c, o .o y. w p <D
� � �' � � o � �0 7 Cn 0
a � ° � � � � �°e � �
� � � � �
o • "a' � � �' � �
o c�o 3 � �' a � �, � a
�. .P'�, a� � -o -o o �. � 'o p7
�' ti � X �' � N � � �
�
,o m •'= �", � o w' � " a. p- 3 D
�
� � � � ,c� c `° � °- 0 1c �
°. '' `� � 'Zj � � cD 7
= � 5' �' � y a �
� p � � N N � "�6 �, y <
� a' v�, S � � fD �
n G. n � � F� O. O�
�' � O y X O.
��i, � 3. v�i � C �
co (D in �D i 0. y z A�
P'� (�D � "'� '7 < '3' � �' � �' CG
N P. N � .�.5 •�4 '�• � Z] v�i n
"'� �-t `Ci p� rn c� � A �D
°= �' � o ° � c w � '�' � o y D
<� -", ^��h i � n. n. � < c�v '� � :.
� � � w Q- �D n. �, � �
^ a � � �
� ry. � 7 p A X II.
¢ 'O p� � C n � � � y =
� N .o' � � o y Z w p: �
� zy N � w � �+' �p <p �
`� �' o � =; co p- ,y p � v
O � M
-� p a Cl
v' G. .��- '� r�i� � (�9 in' n C.
� � � N � � 7 � � �
�
� � � � � � ()� � p N
�, " .`°� ., w �o °: ^ -o a D
� � CD .� o Q' � � � D
� '� .; o c a p- �' � �
� n � �-�'i ,� O S X� c° y �1
v`�i vl O � A �. Q �
rn 'L7 '� � n � � .�'.
� o -� ., o � z � � '
� � � o w � y� _ �
.�y � � c� � � 0. 'a p� �
O� 'L7 < y O
� C1. � O ' � <
A
co ? �
CD c�o o. � � w � �,' � o.
^a • ao w � _ � � ^ w ,�, '�3 "'� CO w 'o � � zs m ; � m °' �' y �o py �o � ati w �� �
., � ,, 5' �' co � , g• �� � � -, �, -, y w -� � �, a c� � z o �, 0 3 � � n.
�. 'tj � CD R "S7 �' � CD C] 'C3 � � � f/� "CD't '6 � 'C '"r"'�'� C �-�t (<p � <' � �.. 'Lf Ly ..�t � T� C
tn � � � w � � � �CD-n � n. � 2s' °� n o- � � o �' �D o o � a � a � o- n. � � ;; � a � � D D
cc io r. rn . v co � v a
n . o <, � � n. �' o .d 5 w � �° ,�, a �• n. Q,• n. �' .,� < 3 +, °' � ° <' co r � D
= 7 '' cc o. w ° w aa a, � � . o � �'. .�y o � co � • o w � o- O � �
Z � �� w � � w � � � � � �cs � w � 'O � � o �� �= Cf 0> 7 �
� �. � o � � " �. 5' a. `�° � �� ° D co � o. �;� N � � ° Y � c�'o 0 0 � �* � � o
�o co = � O fD
p CD �' _ °c w e °Q < �° o � �- o ?: � � � � w' �D � � � �' ¢ c < D
o v �c n. o � �D co o n. � y rn � � -s . � ?; � � � �c '� a a � fn � m
o� o o- � °' <' c ,� �o o co' � � � 0. ?» �� � o �D `� o a; � a, o �' io ;: to �
�� o '���'"+ � 7 a' N � �. y � N �, � y z w � �' o y aNi � ?: � � x n. � � � � � y � ::
ry rn a � o� v�' cc co cc � �o �n �o w co �n' .,, c�o c�o � c�o � c�o ?'_ y� z w a � w � co co �
�
N
�,:,. �.,�
� .. .. .—. N �`...�...,:3' N N N 4+ v� � cd ^ ^ � v1 � a-� ...:�;s,�J RS ^+.
� z ,y ca Y o � � � �, o .., � � Z, .y ,n Y °�' -Y °�' 'o •v, � � a� N'o
G1 � X ,�, a�i ia 'C N � o � X .�' �° � ° ° -d F"' � �,�
rn = �o S �a o o y �o � a � a 3 ca. � .c `° o
> d = � �' e °' `� � '� � 'c o y o. � 3 '� ' ?' ° �� b 'o �i ,m
o y � � � � �, a�i � � � n, � °' d 3 ❑ � �
� +' � ¢ � � � � � ° � °; d � > ° " °n � 3 �, y 3 3 W `°
` � v p � q � � �� a, � •� � � ss, '� ❑ � � v�
y ` O o • � � a� � Q- '� a� o • � a '� �a �v � � ca c° -v a� � o
+' a� -� -o '�' E ? °. .� -o .� -o ? -o '" ; °.3 o E en °= o. � > `�°�
Q �'' .D u o �� �. °�' c °�' ��a .� c, a, " o .S w° .� � �' � �ro �
a �° '> � a� � � �,-��. ° c. °' � °�,, E � .� � �a .� � c � � � a � o � �
`� ° � � a�i � ° � N ° c�a a"'i ° � «t ° � ;� a � ."' a�i � s �'' abi � c Y �
W a. [r v � 3 � n. � ,� a �a W a. Cr � . '�, -o c�. F-� '� � . . � �
O
�o `� � � � c� U � � > �
� Y � �
� L
O � > O � 'O cC V
� 14 L � � S7. O � s�.
+' ¢' ry b � �-+ � � � „�,,
> � � z �� a � ° 0 3 �
m � b o 3 U � � °, N
G N y k � o � w � u �
� Q' '� C � �p C � "" G' .fl
Q � j N ^O � L .� 'O
a Q � CL � r�n 'y O v�i
� � � � '� � � V �
s. >, 4, 4: �.,
� '
G� .� ti cC c�C '6 "O �r�i� F� i�" '�O
'� U � � c�d � � � � N
f6 � � '�' � O O �
�. �
+' � � 3
1� C s�. � 'O � � � p T
N G1 O" ry � as � �n � ..`�.� �
a ayi '� k r 3 o c � ci � � �v
L � � � Q .� � � �
++ �; � � � � .d -o � ai 4- � �
o � •,� � a�
� �- w �
a 3 ,.o a � �e o. � � 'o �° � .� �a
a� Q � E '� � � a. °�' " �
V � � �..' � � � a� ,� 'b :3
GO .� ti � � .S � w F� � a �a
� ^o a� � a� a�
� Z •ti a � � � ,
� k ti � � � � � �
lO 'O C3 3 � U b U p�
� y .�' A, � N N � O •� �
�+ � a > � � N 3 o N
� U
� Q p � � � ,CL '• �
L � �
X o ,c �L L >, �. � a� -o v
G� '� a�,' a � ',�' � °' a
Q � ,b � u � `� .a ,� .° � `°n., �
°N' > � N °�' � � � � = �o
� n. h � °a. a o. E�-� � � �
�a u � >, -o �; a� � a� o
-o � � �a � a' •> o ?
�s ., � 'Y � w �
O o � °��' o � o a�i �
N C a. �., .. «. �
fA � p � � .� � � � � �y .
�� > :� � z �� ,a � .� ',� � �
Q- c+-�a y -d � � °' .x � � Q � a
� C v � x � o �'- � ;� � � .Y � ,�
O `m y � =o �C 3 o n, � °� �
V � � � � � � � � � � y
Q — o � '-� a� �? i •� � o a�
� a � d � � � ,�, a� -o � � � �
� � a, � ,. � 3 � r� �, � �
� rA .� � a .� -o x 3 a H 3 ,c
�
� -o u � v v,
� b � � � �
� �
�c �° � � „
Q � y c=a a .v �
� � � � y � Z �� 3 -o
rn � �
w c N ��,�-,, p a� k �
0
� � b �
C +�' O, i� a�i a� '�
� Q O � o � � �
d
Q .v d � `° c'' �
� � R � '� �
N Gq .� ti i� c�d .�
�
i
n a�i � � a � o°�n � � °� �' � ,� � o Y o -� -o � o
C1 -v � � c�a .°?, o '�n �� • o �
� �p '> � a� ° `� c � 3 � a E .� � 3 c .o
CS. S� ir L N
� i"� ti� � o. -o � w °' � c. c° � .� 3 °��' .� �° � :: �
_ia .� �a ,� � `" � �'�' n.
> c�o C +• `� Z 5 0 °_' ° � '� a�i � a: = c� N .Ccq °�' 'c c� •� �
i:+ O.� � C iC ,�, 3 c� a�i � 'O w �' y � y ^ .�^ '� '� �� �
f6 (/� '" C1 d � �i � � � � � > V � � G rn � S1
L C L � y .� 'O Q � � O � O cd L' � � � cd � Y � .E
m d v � " c � 3 � 3 -o � ° o on �� � �
Q O � � � o a' � � ,.a � v �o a� � � Y o, -o = c a� o ai � �'
U -o Q � � a' � � F" � o � 3 � �p u' °�° � o � �; a``"i -o c�'a
N � � '� � >, on � 3 � a .� a� o � .c � � a�
� C �; � : a? y o fl- N o � � � p �
CO .� ti �a ro .S -o '� � � x �� -� a � .5 � 8 0 o F�-� 3 ,c
'O U v1 N v�
� � .o `y�� :Y � ;y
�o �
c°- � �' �
N � 0. '� �
> +'' y C � ,� � O �
'a+ � C � .D ti 3 �"
� � � N °' '� � �
� �o �C
r.�+ O �C � � y �
Q d t, � p A. �
�
N ,N -O Q � `� ¢' �
N � '� �
❑ W W.� � �e ro .�
� X v � 'O
�' � "O Ci .�' O
C �
� N a�i � �
> O. .0 a' ~ 'O
�+ p " Q p
�° y c " 3
d a�i ° � > �
0 � [r •� • a
a p � :D �, c .�
Z N o � y N
� �
CO a Z � ro
-� I � � v� at � x � � oo y >, -o �o � -cs >, U ai o �o a� � o � v�
v � � c °, U O ac°i �� =o o � c a a� °�' v, � �c � a a ro as °o O
� ta a �a � ..a o. � c 4� q �3 °' � � o o � J W c > � E-� .� o �
o a E � � � a. � ° � c a, o � .o ,x v> > �, ?? � � �
a U � � n. _ °�° �? � � ❑ .� �n O � � .� 'O � �
d E E � �a o C ;� o � o , c,, � � c� a d � o � a� v� .n
� � � ,� �. o o �, Q a� d �+. sy > � o � � v� � U � � � °'
y �o o C� a � � � .� " o >' Q c o � o ° ro
�, a ^ � -a ❑ • -a a� c � � a� a� �, o � w �' a: a�
0 y o � ° > � ° � o o '� � •v y ro � c`�i � .. � � i =� T �a o � � „ � �
G. C Er y a� sl v a� "o cn O �
� O W .� ti R.' Q v] u; . W .G -o 'o y 3 -0 47 a�i L �" a� � � o � � C T .
a �. � o � � � o � �, �o � � ro v� .5 � � v� � ro � > � v .
• a1 a Z � w ° 3 '� � o, . . U d U � w �
�
0
�
N w M �
�
� � � � �
� � O
C N
d � N c�C �N
'� GL f�Z
O W � N=
n ��
�� �
m 8, � b '<_
�.O � � vi O
, � � 3
� ' y � �
�
� � �
�.o �, A �i
T°'
�
�l � •� ,,,j • • • �' �' `=. o � '-�
� B �' o o � is ts � c� c � � �
'.d � � c � ^ �,
� � :.7i � a ^a s �7 �• o � Cd 'z "� C-' � o .n �• o o a7 z '� �"" � a � � � � � � w' R �° p'O
m �, w �� o c � o � °c `° �, O C � -�, o c � � � C c�c °c ° � o' � v° � v�i
�c � ts � 5' �o N � vr v� -� g' co w C� o
o w � cn �o s w w w i� �o �. G cv �,' o. � �, � o y cD
ry � �, � < o o t�7 5� w w o � < o o .n 5' � < � °' "'. w rn a
� w o � �D °' �D ?; � c � � `< �' � c � °; � ° < a
w co a � y G. ,^_, � o. '� p� � a, ^. � G, � co � �
�. � �.
.; � � < � N o � N o � � �' .; � � � s.
.�',, c�v o c�s r � w r� � o �tc r oi� � a, co o � a. ,�.� �y �. n <D
w �o' O n ts w � n �y w �. �o .� c�
o � co c�o � 'ps' v� � cCv � A: �o � cn C n. w' � �,' ... N � w c� co co � '�
-� �'
o �' o. � Z
n: �' p- �, � D
7 � �
� � �
N. � N � � 7
� � p1
'O =
�
<' w �� � �
� � . � �
F �
. �
o = �
c
a p-
,.�.� � � � G� � �+. �p � � � m
�
(,• q c�o w y � a ca'o X 0
'O� w � � G' t�'" 'L1 A�-. .r.' � �' y <
�, <. ,.''3� o � �• bv o� � � m D
p, co CD � p, co � ��p p ''*
� o. s c, -a �
O A � � � p k G. Q �D � rt
R o y w � � � z w 7, � � C•
O, C 5� Z w �' G V"'� w � N C �
� p, " � o � O. T o � � � N
�' � � � � �. a' � � � � �
v� (D �n ry O. m (D m n a.
0 0 � a� �cs y � � n. w w �.
� °= � � � � m � � '"� ° � a � ^ � o `< � ' w. ° � � o
a� � � -s o �,• 2y' cP ,, rn � �'
�' � A o rn � �° ,c� �. o o co �' o `� � o � `< � �� � A Q, n
'� ?; � y °' w " o � 3 � a c � o w � < � o y � n w �' �o O
cw�»c <' � � a � o � °' 3' � °' io °c � c�o m v�,' �° °' co �� '° °o �1 � �.p D
a � n. � � 'o „ w � °�° °, a o � °' g � o. � o = °� � a '�' y 3 � 3 �
o � x� CD �- � � �' � �• � � w' o = ,� � o s k� �' a � y �
p v� v, � � _ ?: � <� CD o o � p n. <D c� ,� � �
� o � z °��' w o g• N ac• �° � ,* � °� � � � o � `" � o � z � � d� � <
w C �'� .a � o � � � �, -� � � � N 'o' � � °n c��o n. y. �s �� � c�D w �
� c-
� � o• � o 0 o a. o � =; o � .o < y o 7 - C>
i ° ?: a p � �, �' � � � a. � �-n o �; � < a �
v, si �' w c = o °' �. ?' = o co• m � v, o: cD
� c�o v,' n o. c�o n. G. c0.v n' c�o � t�o c�c �' �G io '� � � � c�o v, � G. V
�
�
� � � �, � �• � � � �• � N
�3 �' `e �o �
� 7 A D p0. � 'O� � A 9 n' � ^r
w �' � � a rn• � � � �Q D �
co � m
0. � a' T a A' rn O � > > �
O � k n' O �C � k � (Q � � � �•
� O � 'Z'� � � � �. Z P� fD �C1 ID
C• p„ �' Ty n �' ,a � � � �
(D � O � � � Q �
� � � � 0. � � ? � � �
�n (D v�� n a. r�n (D v� n A. �
_
' a' +• � CO � �c '3 b � ,T, � � �= � p Cd �
.�, � 'b � v�i '�* °c � � c � -�, '�' � � � a1
� � ° a n' � °' ;;, ° °' e �, � � � � °� � �
� p' � o co ° aa �' `4 c�c `° <' � j — D
� � 5 � � � � � � o �' � � � O
° n. � �'� �c � '° a � a °- �' c> > 3
.b o � k' � � w � w � � �' 'ti °c p x � c�o N
�c c � a �cs ° v, a �'� �' co n. ,� '�
w�, p. � a' � � -� � �. n' � z ,,., ,.,: < �
� o �,. Z m . �' a� '�� �'. c � o �'' .0 3 cr y
� io � co -fDi R � � '' y G
^ ,��. T G n- � .: � "y � Z �G 7
� '� . ,a• A� A�� � A G.
O. `G in� n O. O cD '� iD �' O. `G v� n P.
't7 'c7 � A� .-j 'CS 'c7 'C3 y '6 aJ
� 'S � �-s � � � 7 c9 Np� O � � "'S W
� v� � � �' �' n � -�i X' T. � N � < (ND
� � °' °' �o w °= o 0 o w• °= � °� � 3 D
�
� �D � � � � n, c�o ° � � � � 'a a � c�D 3
�• � � �• � 5' � � a a d
� .�. � o � � a � <' '� =
c�`o c�o a � �' � o. w � � � c�o y W
v, � � fD �
� S � � � a. � � � � a
a a �o � o `c K a
� � y k a. p�i � a� o C ^ a�
� d 5' Z � (ND (�D w� � � a y z N
� � � � � � � � � � � � � �
'LS � �O N � 'LS G C � C�
� � n. � !n' � o � � a N � �D G. C
�, o � � s y D
N _ � ,n � C m � ° 'o� = w '� � �
�' � i° 'a � � °� a � N a* � CD o � �
�, p y a � X � �ry �" v� fD N
F � �cs °- �c�o � � Z m � a °. p: <
� � � 5' a a � �D �
O. A 'y -y
w y y' o m a!-+�, `e o � � w w� o Oi
`G n O (� R. f�'� �' n A. W C� O �.
vi ? a' �i '-� O. ^t ,a D �' ? = �' �]
� O � < N R � (ti�D '�'� � S� �y � W � N �
p. � � 'IJ � � p t�i� � � p„ d �' [y'�i S � �
� 0 � � � � � � � ''� y x A� r"'�i� r' � � �
� O
S O- '. p � `G w .:, � � � z � � O ct f�p �
tp p� � a, � � c� '� a� �p O- y 7
� �
� `� � ti 'O v' N O �' N O p o w n p�' o � <
W O ?? ?�, � � < 7
�D
w � �. �• � o � � o �, � � � �' o �' � �
° � w � � ^' °' ° p' c' ❑ � °' " " ^ o
� � o 'o n. in co
� in w � d � (�D 0. � c�D O. A �� 7 � (D O.
� � � w ts w ^o �+ � ^o w � w n. y �a p� �a • ao
� �, � �o t� v� �• cro w �• �• � � � �. � � �: � o � o N �, o �, w o � c�o z o � o � �
< fD Q o v, o. �o � "� 'a � co c� 'cs v, � v, rn � -n ❑ � � p � �n . ts y
� � < to co a� °: � a� C � �: w c�' �S <_ co -� tt a: �p '� '=� '� � �c co m
cn o � o.: n. � � `° 3 a " � ,.�,, � a, � v' � � o: o- � o � o o � a �, o � a; c. � � � D
� ;-. �, w c � _ D
= c�n � � o w � c�c n. N � � `° � o° ^ °- w � � ° co � �= a �' '° ° � `° a� � � � �' O 3 �
z � � � ❑ o � � �- 'B � = ° 'b � w co � 'B � n d � v
� p R o � co �' C 5' a `° ° � ° Y co � o. N ° :' A y �' � r: � °.r' o
iv � � � m c � 3 � a° � 'B io � --°o o °: c c � � a"' CD -� � �. `D y O cD � D
� °: � 1a � c�o 'T3 tNo °' a A' �o � � �° o• c o a � � w � � . � � ?; � a � co "� p, 3 fn � m
O d p, p p, ,� 0. � � Ly � y 'p � ry C A �- p' N O �n O � A �' 'O �y � � 7
�m o `� X n, O m < .� � o y 3 �, p- � X o. o .� w � �:. � � k o- ° a+, �
o �, � �n �-*, co � �... co' co ... �' ?; s �- � < o �' p,• �,• z ?: �o r+ �
rVv o� c�c a� �' z �' o. � a� v`, t�o in � � • � co v,' � '� z w c�o v,' -�+, to co co co � to m a� � �p
N
W
�._ ,�,.:., �,
�
� a� v v a� w ^ a� c� v v c� . ��: .;.,� a� „ � ca �, . a� c a� a� a� a� a� �+-� ^ a� v �v
� � � � ,� o • .c � Z •� .o ;� .N � • � .b .� L � „ ° � � •`a -y � � Y E y � ° ' � ,�; E N o
w; ro 'a � F ° � ?� o .° °' � a. � � -c� � � � 'o a�i � 't � N � o � N �a
� � � �, � � . �, � �a y Q � O � .°�, � °� ¢' � ? ,.d '� s. � O, 'a ., � A `� � � , � id .� � � p�
y C y '� c� y a� rC 3 ^c3 O a� 'a o a� c� �- �
> G) % � o o. a� �. > " �s � �o � � 'o � � °' '� o o � `°
:r > � �? � � •�, .o � � a „ '- a a� on 3 a o � � w' � �? c° � � a� -� � �
�a :�. �a '� � � �' ° � :' d � > o a� '�o c 3 �, i 3 3 � � o •�, c � � -- '0 3 ;; a�°i � � m
� �a v � E a � 'N � c '� �� � � � � '� o � �? � a, 'E c, � •�, �a W cn
+_d+ � J > Q" � `� 'O � -O > � ti � � bA c�C ai O, a�i > 'O � � j p, .� v� � N L � �.O
y . • ^O y id C s., V � 'O .., 'O > v� i�
a Q c .n � o o � a�i o � .b -° � � c`' � � � � •� �° � �o � >' � ,� o `� -o � E `o o a��i o .� u O
�- � w a 'o o, � � '> � �� � y �. � as o �. .� �; � E � � � ry °' .b �y E �a a�
«-' o � �, � ro '� � �' � � � y '� � � � � � E c �.? °A c .� .� ,�, '3 0 ^ >, � ° � 'i � :� E c �
�a 3 ca a v� �. c� � W n. [� c� . 3 F-� 'v� �. . . � � . F-� -o �a 3 � �n c� n. �n � a �a � �
O
C� y U 'O 'O a� a� � v' "O O
� rn w � � � > ^ �
� � �
� � y y�, � 'O cC L � v� f�. U
� � � � � � �C TS N � O
� � � � � 3 y O �.. y G.
> „ z � � ,; � � 3 � � „
�' � � � °� � N � �� �
�
C N! X � '� i� � U "+-�' ? cC ��i,
y � � o o � � a. � � -o N
+, � '� 3 .°�' � � .b � � � c°
a Q n. o y c° o °�' � � � .
� � w � � � �
� � p' c�a � °s�' w � � c�a a�i
, tS, C Ar N W v � ¢, '
cd � �, ,L' cd N ,� +y .� � O
� '� �.�+ . � F-' ..i'-+ '� H '� . 4
'O ry N U 'O 'O � N N
� ' � �
� � � � � N � � �
1� C � �' � U 3 �n r� �
y N a �C -a .� o
> .� � Z � � � � v, �'
'a+ N ia � > � cd ,� r`�j v
C � � k C b cC i� � � � ,N
d � +'�-� � � � a~i a�'i � .'��" O
�+ �
Q tn � o °- � 3 �c �a � � �, -�
7 � -p �' U p, U N a'�., � N
U ' ¢ � c a '� � °' _ � °
sy � a
� � .5 � .� .� � H ,t �a � `o.
N fn N N 'b L b V]
N � N Q
� � U
a�i � b � � ,� 3 � .� '-
�
0
� � � a� a� a� p-
�+ = C O. 3 a�0 � E " � �
R �C cd •� id v�i = }N, �n
C y ' � N O
a: � ° a � ? °' � � °' � °
Q ,� ,� � �a n, � cd � � � a'
� � � � •� �� � � '> �
� � .c •� � � � ro � ; �
a a F� �a � E� .� '� � �e
�, a� � a� o a� s. �n �
a .? o ? > � � �
_ � c� w ce -o .� � � a.
O � � a�i ° a�i °' 'o � � °
N �A C .. «. � �. � � 0.
d � � cC ¢, cO Q" � 4. V
�` > +' t '� �^ � 3 °
� �' m � � a � �
� c � � � ro � � � .� ? � �'
o `m m o. �, °' � �� .� �
U � � U � y .p L y�, N � �
�: �
� a a � � . b=D 4� � � � ^ ,.+
� y� 'LS 'C y 'O cd V U
� -o 'x 3 a E-'�� 3 � .c � ., °� o
� • H � �� .� a
�
� � � � b
> _, � a�
e� .a r � �? o�
c�a = � �" � °
� GI t� � � O �. U G.
> e0 cp 01 3 � ' v
� C � '+�—+ `p '�— ro `°�" �
fC y y � �' ia �p v�
c +• fl. �N � � ❑ �
� a � Cl v ro C�Nd tn Y U
� �
Q � �, � �
°' ;� � ; a, 'o
N � E-� � �� .� a.
�
�
� � � E :: ?' ,� .Y .o o Y -o ,D �o �o a� a� � �
� ,� � 'o w � -`�0 3 b � � .°c a 3 � •c ? '� � °��' °c,
10 M .. C c�C � � � � N � O � O p � .� � � 'O v' T O�
U
~ a> c�i c � � o � o •°' � o a�ei Y 3 `" `� .�c � t�'�' � 3 i o � � a
> �3 p i4 C `' � -d w N °p � � �, •°A � � ° " 3 ° � �
!�6 f/� �' C> G1 S] � 7 � � '� � > `� iC �-''+ C " ¢' `n rn � `" y
L C d N � � `� o c � .� � •� .o y �+, `� � � c��d .� ? c�'d v�i
a� a> � m � 0 3 g '� 3 .b � o an �� �a � sy ��a -o N
w, Q. � � y � �, � ��e � � � � � � � � T � � a �
Q O � �p � � .a :� � � � o � � � � � � � o ' � °y' � N Y
� F" � E � 3 � a c o E a� `+� �' �c � �
V �? >, bo 0 3 �, °o. .� °' ° ° '� � '�-' w � � � 'U'
� �� ^ y >, o .p � o � � � o o. c"i .� L c .� .� _ � 'o
.. -o '� a x a � . � o o E� . E� � . a
N b t T �
°; a�
y R _ 0 3 E.'�.., '�
N c a .� 3 � -o
� �
� +��' y c o a�i w � �v
�; C C C � � � �o c�
R � y � 'b �, .� p, �
c � � N °' �, �, �
b �
.:+ O � C i U c�a r�i, � a�
Q ; 'y� f6 L .'�.+ A, p >
�
� x � � `� � � �° �
a. ¢, � a
0
v a�
� � c�d � 1�.. 3 �
O V � ,L V 'C
� N 'p
C
� d � � 3 'o o �
m E � � � n, � >
:r o
� � � b � U � � cd
� � � � � G O � �
a� d 3 +w a � "
0
� � y ; �' ��' ° 3 �
a Z o. ^., °' a � a�'i '�
� � � � T
� '� v�'i � ."�.+ F-' �
yC1 �+ L� " N
� C1 y V] U W � � +c-'
'� a � � O ,b j O T � � ^c3 � U
a � °' a�i a� � � .� � ° co � •� w'
'O — � � � � � ia U � Q a? U • N C
y � °N' Q v� .� o a� � Cj o o � w � ,00
Cc> � a� ° � �
. � T � �� � °" � � � a°�i � o � T �
p C a `� � „-, � � '�o � o � a o ,� � �
� a o � E-� �n � .5 � v� r-4 v� a � a � �
�, • • v �
�� � N
� d � O
N �' (n �
d � � � � � o
> � �
C C y � � c% �
� 0 N � ^ �N
.; y � .> ^Z
p W +'' � � p�_
n
_ � a�
�� �..
o',�' �.:
�o �
O
^� y O
o cp = 3
�� � �
� 7
c�D�� �
��
�
m
� � �
i � o
� ��
0
� r�►, N
o � �-
; � �
� o
t°�i �
� �
Z
o y
o �
< �
m 3
o °*
� <'
3 �
m �
�
.'
xo
�
d = � D
� � o �
a �
o � � �
3 =
3• � � <'
� �+ c fD
N
� a
a� �
� �
n
0
� � �-o �
�o �
a � fD > >
�o � °�', � °:
� � o �°c► <
�� � � w �
� - �
Q. �
<D
V
� a
�.
� o v_ �
� ; � � '
o r. � � °�
� ocn o� <'
=
� �� <. c�
_ � � �
� � A -O
a °1
�
'+
�
C
�
O1
� �
— D n
� � o
c�
� � 3
� � �
�: �' �
O y
� � O
— 3
� D
r.
�
a �
c =
N �
N �
n
�, D
.'
� �
� n�i
N =
a �
j V
�
N
D D
� �
N 7
O. �
<D L
3 �p
=
�1 �
'� A� v� y ,�� � ^ ^j �d �. � A.�. � '6 �. �
o, � a � ro q .� C- �c � � < ic cc °c ° � °c
� � `° � n. � c�c ,.~�., � o w c. o =i n. �
�; �• D
n � � p� '<' c�o v, n. .c � °c � < c�v G- � �— � m
_ � � � �o o. w � � �y � � 'cs t�o n 3 �
o �. � � F � �' � � � c o r: �" � 'Vo
o � w 0. � � � � a .. � � � �. N O N < D
o d c. o �� � '' s N 3 f0 � m
c�n� '� � � °' �' a' o �• c o � � � � c�i
�m ° �D = � � � co' �; � co' �- ,s �' �
�� a � �• m v�' c�o in c�c � � oc � in `� � �S �
N� N