HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR - APP-0533-14 - EXHIBIT E SPECIFIC PLAN ERRATA Errata to 6th Screencheck Rio Santiago Specific Plan
December 2,2013
Errata to the Rio Santiago 6th Screencheck Specific Plan
The applicant agrees to make the following revisions to the Specific Plan document based on the direction by the
Design Review Committee on October 2,2013:
1. Language specifying horizontal and vertical movement along building elevations that face East Santiago
Canyon Road has been added to section 4.2.5a Plotting and Spatial Considerations
2. YMCA building setback from East Santiago Canyon Road revised to 100' depicted in section 6.5.3
Recreation, Open Space and Other Non-Residential Development Standards. Figure 4.2 Permissible
Building Height Location Diagram revised
3. The age qualified independent living building's 3-story component setback along East Santiago Canyon
Road revised to 75' depicted in section 6.5.1 Age-Qualified Residential Development Standards-Villas,
Independent Living, and Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing. Figure 4.2 Permissible Building Height Location
Diagram revised
4. Clarification on 3-story building height-36' height setback at 75'with an allowable additional height of
1' for each additional 1' setback, with a maximum height of 42' depicted in section 6.5.1 Age-Qualified
Residential Development Standards-Villas, Independent Living,and Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing
5. Enclave graphic with revised enclave lines has been included into the document as a new exhibit—
Figure 4.11
6. New architecture styles(California Contemporary and Early 20th Century Spanish Revival) have been
included into the document as new exhibits- Figure 4-9 and Figure 4-10
7. Building material limitations have been removed under section 4.3.2 General Architecture Standards
8. Minimum eave and rake dimensions have been removed under section 4.3.2 General Architectural
Standards
9. Text depicting detached garage roof treatment open to allow more options, such a parapet roofs,
included under section 4.3.2 General Architectural Standards
10. Language to encourage ganging of plumbing vents included under section 4.3.2 General Architecture
Standards
11. Language to encourage driveway pairing when appropriate added under section 4.3.2 General
Architectural Standards
12. Development Standards- revised maximum square footages to minimum square footages and adjusted
square footages to reflect this requested change under section 6.5.1 Age-Qualified Residential
Development Standards-Villas, Independent Living, and Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing
13. Window trim detail be consistent on all elevations-The Specific Plan already had this language under
section 4.3.2 General Architecture Standards, subcategory Windows
14. Language included to suggest offsets between windows on adjacent buildings when setbacks are 10' or
less under section 4.3.2 General Architectural Standards
15. Language included to reiterate that a Comprehensive Wall and Fence Plan is required for each Planning
Area under section 4.4.8 Fences and Walls
16. A 0.7 FAR has been included in the Development Standards for the Single Family residences under
Section 6.5.2 Single-Family Residential Development Standards per DRC recommendation
17. Removal of Craftsman and Andalusian architectural styles within Chapter 4 section 4.3.1 Architectural
Character and Style
EXHIBIT E
SPECIFIC PLAN ERRATA 1
RIO SANTIAGO
MAY 13,2014 CC MTG.
Errata to 6`h Screencheck Rio Santiago Specific Plan
December 2,2013
18. Text revised to state minimum lot with is 50'wide with a 55'wide average under section 6.5.2 Single-
Family Residential Development Standards
19. Plant Palette revised to show a more natural vegetation palette for Planning Area A under section 4.4.17
Plant Palette
20. A shrub/tree category was added to the Plant Palette for each zone under section 4.4.17 Plant Palette
21. Added the word "linear" before vigorous root system under section 4.4.18 Parking Areas
22. Language included under section 4.4.7 Residential Landscape Criteria to specify slope planting-
minimum tree density of 2 trees per one thousand square feet
23. Language included to clarify that the recreation building and age-qualified buildings along East Santiago
Canyon Road, and the single-family along East Santiago Canyon Road should be compatible architecture
styles under Section 4.3.2 General Architectural Standards
24. Shift buildings back 6'additional feet on street side without sidewalk?This is a suggested revision that
the applicant does not accept
25. Street sections Planning Area D-4' Sidewalk one side with landscape both sides-this has been revised in
the document under the following sections and Figures:
a: Revise 3.3.2a Vehicular Circulation text
b. Figure 3.5 Street Cross Sections
c. 4.4.3 Trails, Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation
d. 4.4.4c Private Local Streets and Drives
e. Figure 4.24 Residential Street Section
2